The main services we provide

Our services are designed to address in particular the following market and industry developments:

Three main types of value propositions are offered to the market, each building upon our converged network and access capabilities in combination with “ET Boss”, our proprietary telecommunications Operating Support System (OSS) and Business Support System (BSS) and our thought and software technology leadership in (electronic) fraud prevention, security data and privacy related to high volume transactions:

Our services deliver critical benefits to our customers:

Integrated Mobile Enabling Platform (Full Core Network & ET BOSS)

Elephant Talk is actively seeking additional MNO partners that understand the symbioses between a mobile network operator and an applications-focused enabler that brings the right services in the right format through a secure delivery platform within reach of all business customers that may require such services as part of their overall market and product strategy. We believe that over the next couple of years MNOs will proactively seek partners like our company, as it will be the preferred way to successfully expand from retail focused markets to wholesale markets, thereby more effectively using the capacity of their core antenna networks and spectrum capabilities.

The growing importance of converging services is an area where we see excellent possibilities to combine our decade long in-depth experience in landline services with our sophisticated mobile delivery platform. This will support both our MNO as well as our MVNO customers to bring newly bundled services into the marketplace through a single device that is capable of using landline, IP, mobile, and wireless connectivity for any voice, data and multi-media application. All this will be provisioned and managed through one single customer account and one integrated bill that is supported by any relevant payment mechanism.

We see opportunities in customized mobile service, combining the individual profile of a mobile customer and his or her exact location, with the “always-on” secured connectivity of a mobile network, supported by our powerful mobile delivery platforms. We believe these elements will create completely new business models for MNOs and MVNOs alike, bringing personalized, contextual and time-wise relevant services to billions of customers worldwide. One can easily think of new applications in the areas of security, protection and logistics of people, goods and services, remotely monitoring and escalating medical care, individualized and contextual marketing communications for broad ranges of goods and services, and supporting secure financial transactions.

Most of these new business models, driven by customized mobile services, will be created and operated by independent third party application providers that may be directly or indirectly connected to mobile service delivery platforms like our MVNE platform. In areas we see attractive opportunities to create, operate and market such services ourselves, we may actively invest in such developments or may acquire other companies that already have developed such applications.

Fraud Prevention and Security Software Solutions

ValidSoft was acquired by Elephant Talk (ET) in March 2010. ET is a telecommunications company that can service the needs of ValidSoft’s requirements to deliver its leading solutions whilst also providing a platform to enable ValidSoft to process up to 400,000 transactions per second, to “carrier grade” level (i.e. industry standards in telecommunications). Equally, ET is itself a leading provider of MVNE/MVNO software that offers ValidSoft the opportunity to service the security layer needs of this capability. Whilst the synergies between a telecommunications security solutions provider and an innovative telecommunications company may seem obvious, our growing Intellectual Property capability bears testament to this. As the convergence towards the smart phone crystallizes, the need for the security is paramount, and telecommunications is at the core of the capability. Together, ValidSoft and ET innovate, leveraging each other’s core capabilities and strengths, to be the global leaders in managing and securing the mobile cloud.

Landline network outsourcing services

Even though the majority of our investments in the past years have been in (mobile) software development, mobile related acquisitions and implementing MNOs and MVNOs, our largest revenue stream is currently still generated by our traditional telecom services like Carrier Select and Carrier Pre-Select Services, and Toll Free and Premium Rate Services. These services formed the basis and gave us decade-long experience as an outsourcing partner in the field of telecommunications services managed by our propriety Intelligent Network/Customer Provisioning Management/Billing platform. This platform has always been designed to put our customers, who purposely chose to outsource their telecommunication requirements to a specialized company like us, in control: our customers can work with our technology and our delivery platforms as if these are their own. We empower and likewise facilitate our customers to harness, to manage and to fully apply the power of some of the most powerful mobile/landline delivery systems in the world through a web-based self-care user friendly interface, without the need to initiate, install, fund, operate and support those global systems on a 24/7 basis.

Products

We are positioning ourselves as a complete MVNE with our own integrated platforms, switches and network capabilities for back-office and customer interaction solutions. Next to providing a full Core Network,the back-office services range from provisioning and administration to Operations Support Systems (“OSS”) and Business Support Systems (“BSS”) running on our global IN/CRM/Billing platform “ET BOSS”. Our “ET BOSS” platform is designed to provide an all-in-one solution for both the traditional MNOs:

MVNOs are generally fast-moving sales and marketing companies reselling refocused, re-priced, re-bundled and repackaged mobile telecom services. We partner with MNOs to bypass their legacy systems to profitably accommodate these wholesale MVNO customers with service levels and applications that satisfy the instant service flexibility, and pricing capability that MVNOs require to specifically address their niche markets. At the same time, we can offer additional market share to MNOs by marketing and contracting our own range of MVNOs that look for the very specific capabilities that our mobile service delivery platforms may offer. Bundled together with attractively priced wholesale airtime packages provided by our MNO partners, our MVNOs are positioned to run their operations effortlessly without the technical and financial burden associated with the development, maintenance and ownership of their own mobile network, while at the same time focusing on sales, marketing and distribution and the application of all elements required to be successful in these rapidly evolving consumer markets.

Our internally developed customer provisioning, rating and billing system ensures proper support for all of our services. We believe our network and system platforms are able to handle the high demands of national incumbents and other telecom operators on our globally interconnected network. The key component of our business strategy is the fully automated capturing and recording of any event on our global network through a standard Call Data Record, or CDR. CDRs are globally recognized and accepted by all of our suppliers and customers because of their high quality, reliability and consistency. As a result, on a real time/on-line basis, we believe our billing engine provides reliable inter-company payment overviews, and will continue to do so as we develop and implement our global network.

Our products offerings consist of an extensive software portfolio that we have developed to provide comprehensive customer functionalities. To maintain flexibility and allow for growth, the company has chosen to develop our own proprietary software and systems also known as ET’s Business Operating Support System (“ET BOSS”). The core modules have been designed to address all of our major business processes, and those of our partners in such a manner that the state of the art flexibility, level of integration and dynamic feature set ensures rapid and low-cost deployments. BOSS has to be designed for flexible deployment to ensure Elephant Talk’s business processes are supported by the solution with minimal operational changes and that sales partners / resellers, customers are being serviced in a way that they can optimize their business processes by using BOSS.

The core modules and their sub-modules include amongst others:

Our products focus on:

Infitel Suite - IN Platform

In order to achieve real time session control, rating and charging, telecom value added applications as well as improved enrichment of data generated in and passing through our networks, we have acquired the carrier grade next generation IN (Intelligent Network) platform “Infitel”, including the source code and trademark. We own and develop this platform, thereby ensuring the flexibility and integration we strive for in and between all our software and network components.

Our ET Boss software enables mobile carriers to outsource their entire back office to Elephant Talk. By outsourcing operations the mobile carriers can reduce the number of vendor software, employees, and consultants. ET Boss reduces the number of software modules / vendors from over twenty to one. Additionally, ET Boss enables mobile virtual network operators (MVNOs) to control their pricing and product offerings with the touch of a keypad from a Windows interface. This compares with the current situation often experienced by virtual operators whereby it can take up to six month to effect a change in their product offerings.

With the support of our back office system combined with our integrated “ET BOSS” system, we believe our B2B customers have all the necessary tools to create their own virtual telecom business environment; thereby enabling our customers to recognize and serve their own clients, employees, partners or affiliates through any device, at any place and at any time. Our vision is that access to our global network will revolve around our central data and information base, which will allow our customers to provide their clients with worldwide access authorization to our services through a familiar interface and/or workplace, preferred format and language.

ValidSoft - Fraud Prevention and Security Software Solutions

ValidSoft is a thought and technology leader in the market of telecommunications-based authentication and transaction verification solutions for financial services and government organizations. As the banking and payments world, in particular, begins to converge onto smart telecommunications-based devices, the ValidSoft integrated security platform, built solely on a real-time zero client-footprint model, allows organizations to leverage these convergence devices to provide visible and invisible security layers for all transaction channels, whilst also providing protection where the device itself is the channel. The Company’s primary products are discussed below.

This integrated platform, using proprietary technologies including Out-of-Band authentication and transaction verification, Proximity Correlation Logic, Pseudo Device Theft detection and biometric voice verification, allows organisations to protect all of their customer transaction channels within a single platform. This combination of technologies provides solutions from simply detecting SIM Swap fraud through to the world’s first commercially available Four-factor authentication solution. Internet banking, M-banking, Mobile Wallet, Mobile Payments, Card-present, card-not-present, NFC, citizen online services and more are all supported through either one or more of these integrated telecommunications-based techniques.

The ValidSoft platform is also built on privacy, an underlying principle in all our solutions. ValidSoft was the first security company in the world to be awarded a prestigious European Privacy Seal; EuroPriSe. It has now been awarded two seals, one in March 2010 for the VALid-POS card-present fraud detection solution and in September 2011 for VALid-4F, the four-factor authentication and transaction verification solution that incorporates both biometric voice verification and Proximity Correlation Logic; knowing where someone is or isn’t. The second Seal confirms the company’s ability to maintain the highest privacy standards in its work with citizens’ information when contracted by financial services organizations and government departments. In March 2011, ValidSoft was also awarded a registered data controller with the UK Information Commissioner’s Office.

VALid®

VALid® is a telecommunications based multifactor authentication and transaction verification platform that provides protection across multiple electronic banking channels, including Internet, M-banking, IVR /contact-centre, mobile payments and Card-not-Present transactions.

Using patented voice-based Out-of-Band authentication and transaction verification, the VALid® platform combines visible and invisible protection against multiple threats, including Pseudo Device Theft, e.g. SIM Swap and Call-forward Unconditional (CFU) fraud, Man-in-the-Middle and Man-in-the-Browser (MitM/MitB) plus traditional fraud vectors such as Phishing, key-loggers, screen scrapers etc. The solution can also extend to three and four factors through our proprietary biometric voice verification plug-in, VALid-SVP™, and Proximity Correlation Logic; knowing where someone is or isn’t.

All of this protection is available for traditional Internet banking as well as M-banking, where usability is as critical as security. Real-time voice based authentication and transaction verification is the only usable and secure method of protecting M-banking transactions and therefore, the same solution as used for Online Banking, with all the same visible and invisible protection, including Pseudo Device Theft, is provided for M-banking, but configured specifically for mobile banking usage. This means no keying of OTPs into the phone, and even a completely hands-free model using speech recognition if required. Additionally biometric voice verification can also be layered for even greater security.

Whichever electronic channel requires protection, the fully configurable behaviour, customisable down to the transaction level, is designed to be driven by transactional risk and provided in a fully integrated fashion on a single, pluggable platform.

VALid-POS®

For card-issuers the world over, one of the greatest challenges faced is cross-border fraud committed at ATMs and Point-of-Sale (POS) devices. Whilst the actual fraud losses are significant, of equal if not greater concern, is the resultant impact caused by high decline rates. False-positives (declining legitimate transactions) are a major problem and can account for as much as 90% of cross-border card-present declines. This results in lost interchange fee revenue, high costs of fraud case management and inconvenienced customers.

VALid-POS® is a telecommunications based security solution aimed specifically at card-present fraud detection and resolution. It is primarily aimed at cross-border fraud, but can also operate domestically using different techniques depending on the country of issue. In cross-border mode, VALid-POS® can not only detect potentially fraudulent transactions in real-time but critically, can also identify legitimate transactions with an extremely high degree of accuracy, potentially reducing false-positive rates to single digits. Reducing false positive volumes is the cost-effective way to increasing fraud discovery, reducing operational costs and providing cardholders with a vastly improved customer experience when transacting abroad.

Using patent-pending Proximity Correlation Logic; determining the proximity of a card-present transaction to the cardholder’s mobile phone, VALid-POS is invisible to the cardholder, operates sub-second, does not use traditional Location Based Service technologies such as GPS or Lat/Long resolution and has been awarded a European Privacy Seal for compliance with EU data protection law.

The same Seal also covers the patent-pending domestic-based Anonymous Correlation System, a neural solution based on ATM, POS terminal and mobile network correlations.

VALid-SVP™

VALid-SVP™, the VALid Speaker Verification Platform, is ValidSoft’s proprietary voice biometrics solution, based on a completely modular and pluggable architecture, which allows organisations to easily integrate voice verification into the broader VALid® authentication platform. VALid-SVP™ is a leading-edge voice biometrics engine that supports text-dependent, text-independent and conversational voice verification (biometric plus knowledge) models.

It includes a full enrolment module, incorporates liveness, replay attack, synthesis attack and Pseudo Device Theft detection, and operates on any channel the VALid platform supports, including Internet, mobile, IVR and contact-centre.

VALid-4F™

VALid-4F™ is the four-factor implementation of VALid® and was the world’s first commercially available four-factor authentication solution utilizing a single integrated platform. Four-factor authentication comprises the traditional factors of “something you know”, “something you have” and “something you are” with the additional dimension of “somewhere you are”, or more importantly, “somewhere you aren’t”.

Valid-4F™, apart from having a fully integrated proximity engine based on ValidSoft’s patent-pending Proximity Correlation Logic, also boasts its own biometric Voice Verification engine; VALid-SVP™, providing the highest level of user authentication available through its use of text dependent, text-independent and conversational voice verification. Coupled with its Out-of-Band authentication and transaction-verification model, including invisible Pseudo Device Theft detection, VALid-4F™ can provides all four authentication factors utilising a single consumer device, the mobile phone.

VALid-4F™ was also awarded a European Privacy Seal during 2011, attesting to its compliance with EU data protection law for both its use of biometric voice verification and proximity correlation logic.

Industry Developments

A number of relevant factors in the converging telecommunications industry, combined with consumers and businesses increasing adoption of mobile and wireless based applications, drive our investments and services, are as follow:

We believe the mobile phone will become the channel of choice for consumers

We believe that the mobile phone will ultimately be the (handheld) device chosen by consumers and businesses to best bring personalized, contextual and time-wise relevant services such as:

Mobile operators need to reduce total cost of ownership (TCO) and increase utilization of their assets

Mobile Network Operators typically have twenty or more vendors for their software to handle Network Management, Provisioning, Customer Relationship Management (CRM), Billing, Fulfillment, and Distribution. This has resulted in legacy systems that are expensive to maintain and difficult to adapt to changing market conditions. In addition, MNOs are looking for new ways to attract traffic over their networks, since the traditional mass marketing of voice and messaging focused on end-users (“retail”) shows little or no growth. MNOs are required to shift their organization from a mass marketing oriented retail focus to a wholesale focus; thereby allowing other organizations such as MVNOs to serve smaller and specifically targeted end-user groups with specialized and converged solutions in order to increase traffic (e.g. voice, text, data or media) over the operators networks.

Trust and security aspects are increasingly important in a networked and digitalized environment

The open nature of the Internet as well as exponential digitalization and globalization of society has resulted in increased (international) fraud, attention for privacy intrusions and national security concerns.

MVNO telecommunication markets

By Informa1  

Western Europe and North America, both expected to grow in terms of MVNO subscription numbers, are not expected to see a radical shift in terms of market structure. The global MVNO market will reach 186 million subscriptions by the end of 2015 with North America and Western Europe still accounting for the vast majority. These two regions will remain the largest MVNO markets in terms of the number of subscriptions and players and will also continue to top the ranks in terms of MVNO penetration.

By Ovum2

Global mobile virtual network operator connections are forecast to reach 85.6 million by 2015, and revenues are expected to be $9.5 billion. Over the next five years, new MVNO markets are expected to open up in South and Central America, Asia-Pacific, and in the Middle East. However, there are still regulatory and market challenges to overcome before these markets can offer an environment that can sustain MVNO activity. Therefore, we expect the bulk of MVNO connections and revenue growth from 2010–15 will come from established MVNO markets in Western Europe, Asia-Pacific, and North America.

Established MVNO markets will drive growth

In Western Europe, the fastest-growing MVNO markets are Germany, France, Italy, Spain, and the Netherlands. Germany and the Netherlands have been the largest MVNO markets (in terms of the number of MVNOs) for many years, and this is not expected to change over the forecast period, especially as both markets are regarded as good testing grounds for MVNOs looking to trial new business models.

Emerging markets warming to MVNOs

While currently there are very few MVNOs in emerging markets, more markets are expected to introduce MVNOs over the forecast period. MVNOs are expected to move into markets in Brazil and Chile in South and Central America; Turkey in the Middle East; and India, Pakistan, and Vietnam in Asia-Pacific. Markets such as Brazil and India present an attractive opportunity for MVNOs, but there are still a number of obstacles impacting MVNO development in these markets including a lack of cooperation from mobile network operators (MNOs) and a lack of regulation to facilitate new MVNO entrants. Therefore, we expect the majority of new MVNO markets to remain relatively small and have minimal impact on global MVNO connections and revenues.

MVNO revenues to remain steady

Global revenues are forecast to remain steady over the next five years. Currently, Western Europe and the US account for over 84% of global MVNO revenues, and by 2015 we forecast that this figure will fall marginally to 80%. MVNO markets in South and Central America and the Middle East are expected to make up a greater share of global MVNO revenues over the forecast period. In 2009, South and Central America and the Middle East contributed approximately 1% to global MVNO revenues, and we forecast that this will increase to 6% by 2015.

MVNOs have explored numerous segments

MVNOs have been in operation for over a decade, and in this time it has become clear which business models have been successful and which have been failures. “Tried and tested” MVNO business models include targeting low-spending customers by offering no-frills domestic and international mobile services, and targeting businesses and households by offering mobile and fixed service bundles. MVNOs have also had success in other niche segments, such as focusing on the wealthy, charities, or offering gender-specific services. All of these models have proven lucrative for MVNOs and have presented them with good opportunities in most markets. However, while targeting the right segment is extremely important for MVNOs, their success is also dependent on market conditions, competition, and execution.

1 Extract Global MVNO Forecast to 2015, © 2011 Informa Telecom & Media, Publication Date 22 March 2011

2 Reference Code: OVUM052659, Publication Date: 31 August 2010  

Electronic and card fraud market

The solutions from Validsoft are targeted to combat electronic fraud and false positives across card, internet and telephone channels.  Card fraud in the US is estimated to cost financial services around $100 billion per annum (card present and card not present) and $250 billion per annum globally with the telephone channel and other fraud methods accounting for additional fraud and associated cost of $80 billion per annum.  The total cost is around $330 billion per annum^[3^] . Through the ValidSoft technology the extent of this endemic problem can be reduced through tackling the direct impact of fraud, reducing operating costs and improving the customer experience. These solutions also provide an environment which allows banks and other institutions to automate manual process safely and securely.

ValidSoft provides strong authentication and transaction verification capabilities, which allow organizations to quickly implement solutions that protect against the latest forms of credit and debit card fraud, on-line transaction and identity theft. ValidSoft’s advanced proprietary software combined with what we believe is a superior telecommunication platform creates a leading electronic fraud prevention total solution. 

We believe the ValidSoft solution can have large cost reduction potential for financial institutions around the world that have losses associated with fraud losses, false positives and administration in connection with credit and debit card fraud. ValidSoft has successfully completed trials with four major commercial banks and has entered into a strategic partnering agreement with Adeptra in late 2011for its solutions relating to SIM Swap fraud protection, card fraud prevention and strong authentication. Adeptra has an enviable commercial relationship with the largest worldwide issuing banks. ValidSoft was recently awarded its second European Privacy Seal from EuroPrise^[4^] , underscoring the prudent set-up of its systems as to privacy matters.

The essence of the ValidSoft product suite is in providing:

Card Skimming is one of the fastest growing fraud threats. In the US alone, this type of fraud in 2008 was reported as costing the Financial Services Industry over fifty billion $US, and a leading research company is predicting that the cost of plastic card fraud will rise three-fold over the next 3 to 5 years. VALid-POS combines the functionality of VALid’s real-time Out-of-Band transaction verification capability with proximity based mathematical models that assists Issuing Banks in determining whether the genuine customer is conducting the card-based transaction.  Where in doubt, VALid® can contact the customer and resolve the potential threat in real-time.

Card-not-Present fraud, i.e. fraud associated with online retailing, is a significant problem worldwide. The vast majority of this type of fraud involves the use of card details that have been fraudulently obtained through methods such as skimming, data hacking or through unsolicited emails or telephone calls. The card details are then used to make fraudulent card-not-present transactions, most commonly via the Internet. As the number of Internet retailers has grown, fraudsters have increasingly targeted the online shopping environment. In the US alone, this type of fraud in 2008 was reported as costing the Financial Services Industry over fifty five billion $US, and a leading research company is predicting that the cost of card-not-present fraud will rise three-fold over the next 3 to 5 years. VALid-POS combines the functionality of VALid’s real-time Out-of-Band transaction verification capability with proximity based mathematical models that assists retail providers in determining whether the genuine customer is conducting the online transaction. Where in doubt, VALid® can contact the customer and resolve the potential threat in real-time.

3 Javelin Research; Gartner Research; Nilson Report (2010).

⁴ EuroPriSe is an initiative led by the Unabhaengiges Landeszentrum fuer Datenschutz (“ULD”, Independent Centre for Privacy Protection), Germany. EuroPriSe was funded with 1.3 million Euro by the European Commission's eTEN program. The EuroPriSe project consortium led by ULD included partners from eight European countries: the data protection authorities from Madrid (Agencia deProteccion de Datos de la Communidad de Madrid, APDCM), and France (Commission Nationale de l'Informatique et de Libertes, CNIL), the Austrian Academy of Science, London Metropolitan University from the UK, Borking Consultancy from the Netherlands, Ernst and Young AB from Sweden, TUeV Informationstechnik GmbH from Germany, and VaF s.r.o. from Slovakia.   http://www.european-privacy-seal.eu/

Online banking fraud is a significant threat to the take-up of online banking worldwide. Fears concerning the safety of this type of banking transactions prevent banks from realizing the massive cost savings provided by self-service online banking. Globally less than 50% of internet users bank online and security fears remain the primary inhibitor of take-up. VALid’s real-time Out-of-Band strong mutual authentication and real-time transaction verification enables the bank to apply a real-time dynamic rules engine to identify anomalies and to contact the customer and verify the transaction in real-time.

The need for the customer to know that the bank is genuine is just as important as the need for the bank to know that it is transacting with the genuine customer - this is essential in terms of fostering consumer confidence, the lack of which is the single most significant deterrent in terms of the adoption of online commerce. This is termed “Mutual Authentication” and VALid® has one of the most intuitive and strongest forms of Mutual Authentication available.

Even if both parties to a transaction are genuine there is no guarantee that the transaction will not be corrupted. A “Man-in-the-Middle” or “Man-in-the-Browser” attack will succeed no matter how strong the authentication process. Therefore banks need Transaction Verification. Most banks monitor transactions to identify anomalies. When an exception is detected, banks for the most part rely on a manual process of contacting the customer by phone to verify the legitimacy of the transaction – this is expensive and also prone to security risk itself as the customer is forced to reveal security credentials to unknown third parties. VALid® addresses this issue since it has the ability to verify the integrity of transactions in real-time and in a totally automated manner over a separate telecommunications channel. Real-time OOB Transaction Verification is regarded by Gartner as the only effective way to protect the integrity of a transaction carried out on the Internet.

In mass market and extranet situations, service providers are struggling to find a solution that does not require the distribution of hardware devices yet provides strong authentication and transaction verification in a cost effective and convenient manner. It is likely that going forward service providers will be expected to comply with increasing regulation in this area. ValidSoft, through its telephony based architecture enables service providers to implement the strongest form of mutual authentication and transaction verification available. Designed specifically for mass markets and extranet situations, VALid® combines ease-of-use, cost effectiveness and strong security, from challenge response up to and including conversational voice biometrics, to ensure that service providers can verify to non-repudiation level if required, the verification of identity of both internal employees, external contractors and customers who may have access to sensitive material and also conduct transactions electronically.

Long regarded as a form of Non-Repudiation is now vulnerable to Man-in-the-Browser attacks. This means that PKI can no longer guarantee the integrity of transactions and therefore can be challenged in a Court of Law where PKI is presented as a case for Non-Repudiation. VALid® has been designed to address the issue of Non-Repudiation through its multi-layered approach, which includes elements such as: Transaction Verification; Transaction Data Signing (cryptographically linking a One Time Passcode to the underlying transaction); Voice Biometrics (or OOB challenge/response); Customer Authorization (Voice Recording) and Geometric Transaction Analysis, to achieve the highest level of non-repudiation capability, presented to the customer in an intuitive and easy-to-use manner.

Financial institutions cannot leverage the full power and cost effectiveness of the Internet as a Business Enabling/Self-Service medium because of security concerns. Certain transactions requiring branch or telephone banking, or the completion of paper-based forms with signatures (e.g. Address change), are considered too high risk for Internet deployment, and as a consequence these transactions continue to be processed manually resulting in high cost, inefficiencies, poor quality data and customer inconvenience. VALid®, through the combination of OOB Strong Mutual Authentication and Transaction Verification, provides the capability to securely automate today’s manual processes resulting in: dramatic cost savings; customer empowerment; increasing the consistency, accuracy, timeliness and security of transactions; and creating competitive advantage through market differentiation.

Competition

We experience intense competition in each of the market segments in which we operate.

Mobile Services

We face competition from other vendors, from other MVNE’s, as well as from the traditional MNOs. An average MNO may have a few dozen technology suppliers: each may deliver a part of the overall network, switching, control and administrative systems comprising a mobile carrier’s infrastructure to service millions of retail customers. Likewise, many companies are aiming to become a vendor/partner of a MNO in order to assist the MNO to better service their wholesale business towards MVNOs. Some companies try to achieve this by selling various core components as a more traditional vendor: stand-alone switching systems, billing systems, CRM systems, Intelligent Network systems, etc. Examples of our competition in this market are companies like Highdeal, Comverse, Geneva, Amdocs and Artilium. In such cases the MNO often contracts with a system integrator like Cap Gemini or Atos Origin to help them to integrate all these components into effectively working systems. Recently, more and more of these system integrators not only position themselves anymore as onetime integrators, but they are also looking to assume the role as an on-going service providers, keeping (part of) the system up and running on behalf of the MNO: examples are Cap Gemini, Atos Origin, EDS, Accenture, and IBM. Likewise, various vendors themselves assumed such roles of managing and operating the systems they supplied. As such, we also face competition from traditional telecom infrastructure companies like Nokia-Siemens, Ericsson, Huawei, ZTE and Alcatel-Lucent.

As a consequence of these purchasing and outsourcing policies, many MNOs have over the years assembled large teams, sometimes as large as a dozen or more vendors/integrators/service providers, whereby each of them delivers a crucial part of the overall required capabilities. Not only have such larger teams, usually involving hundreds of full time consultants, been requiring very intense vendor management attention from the MNO to coordinate them, the result was often a very complex operational structure and work environment for both the MNO as well as the MVNO to work with. Instead of bringing superior, flexible services at affordable cost levels that were supposed to improve the position of the MNO to easily go after MVNO business, the MNO is often struck with a whole range of hard to manage, inflexible and expensive (and sometimes even incompatible) platforms, that actually undermine the capability of the MNO to successfully and profitably compete for MVNO business. Existing MVNOs threaten to migrate to another network provider, while new prospect are lost to other MNOs that do provide more flexible and affordable service.

Being positioned for many years as an outsourcing partner for other businesses that require telecoms as a part of their overall service offering, we believe we can assist MNOs to simplify and streamline these outsourced system requirements. One of the key elements in our offering in landline telecommunications has always been that all network, switching, control and administrative elements would function within one system, and that our B2B customer would be able to self-manage such system through an easy to use web based interface. In designing its MVNE platform, our company has kept the same philosophy in place. As a result, a MNO would only require one managed service provider to fully offer any possible service requirement any type of MVNO may have. We therefore believe that we not only eliminate an intense and costly vendor management role, but at the same time offer flexible, superior service levels at a much lower operational cost.

Other companies that have positioned themselves as a MVNE platform provider, aiming to assume the same role of a one stop solution provider to MNOs, and as such are direct competitors of us, include Aspider, primarily active in the Netherlands, Vistream/Materna, primarily active in Germany, Effortel, primarily active in Belgium and Italy, Transatel, primarily active in France, Telcordia, primarily active in North America, Virtel, primarily active in Australia and the combination Artilium/Atos Origin, active throughout Europe. However, none of them cover the same depth and width of platform capabilities as Elephant Talk provides. On top of that, on the supplier/vendor side we believe we compete favorably with all the earlier mentioned telecom system vendors and integrators. Even though we believe our company has a very good offering at a competitive pricing level, many of our competitors may develop a comparable, fully integrated MVNE platform in the near future. As many of these competitors are much larger companies than ours, with much higher profiles, it may very well be that these competitors will successfully sell their higher priced, less capable solutions than comparable Elephant Talk systems.

Although we believe we will continue to create excellent opportunities for MNOs to increase the addressable market they can service profitably, many MNOs may still prefer to compete directly with us, not only for the business of larger MVNOs, but also in servicing the many smaller MVNOs. This situation may become more likely if new technologies make it easier for the MNOs to service both larger and smaller non-retail customers directly on a lower cost basis. Also, other MVNEs may create strong competition, especially if such new MVNEs will be created by competing MNOs as a consequence of our success in profitably cooperating with other MNOs that already have a successful MVNE relationship with us.

Traditional Telecom Services

In all segments where we offer traditional telecom services like carrier (pre) select/dial around/2-stage dialing services, premium rate and toll free services, we encounter heavy competition. Our stiffest competition comes from each of the incumbent telecom operators such as BT, France Telecom, KPN, Telefonica, Telecom Italia and Telekom Austria. The strongest price competition usually comes from smaller, locally established and/or regional players, although newer Pan-European carriers like Colt Telecom position themselves as aggressively priced competition.

Fraud Prevention and Security Software Services

ValidSoft’s anti-fraud and authentication solutions face competition from market players such as Authentify, Strikeforce, Finsphere, Tricipher for Out-of-Band authentication (OBB), RSA, VASCO and others for Tokens, and Verisign and others for Digital Certificates and Voice Vault and Nuance for voice-biometric authentication.

However, ValidSoft’s solutions, which can combine with Elephant Talk’s telecommunications expertise and infrastructure, result in state-of-the-art (and currently one-of-a-kind) complete solutions for multi-factor authentication solutions, with an emphasis on debit- and credit-card fraud prevention.

More specifically, ValidSoft’s patented VALid® solution combines strong authentication and transaction verification to counter not only traditional fraud vectors but also the latest in, for example, session-hijacking (Man-in-the-Middle, Man-in-the-Browser). Traditional authentication solutions, including hardware tokens, are vulnerable to these types of threats.

In addition, VALid-POS®, provides a sophisticated third-factor solution, using the international mobile telecommunications network, to determine whether a financial transaction is being attempted in the same approximate geographic region as a consumer’s mobile telephone. ValidSoft, unlike its competitors, does not use privacy-intrusive (and relatively time-consuming) latitude-longitude or GPS services.  The Proximity Correlation Logic at the heart of VALid-POS can also be used on other electronic channels such as Internet banking and M-banking.

VALid-SVP (‘Speaker Verification Platform’) is ValidSoft’s voice-biometric solution, adding an additional authentication factor. ValidSoft’s voice biometrics capability supports text-dependent, text-independent and conversational biometrics and all are capable of being deployed in a single platform and are accessible through a single API.

The combination of ValidSoft’s modules can employ up to four factors: VALid-4F®. This includes voice biometrics as well as VALid-POS for card-present transactions, both cross-border and domestic.

In addition, ValidSoft has developed a SIM-Swap detection solution, to secure the OOB mobile channel: VALid-SSD®. SIM Swap fraud is a first-transaction, spear-phishing fraud vector that is usually a one-hit, high-value fraud loss transaction. This supplements the strategic platform that can incorporate the other anti-fraud technologies that can be activated as and when required – again through a standard API set.

ValidSoft, by using customers’ existing telephony and mobile devices, ensures complete interoperability between multiple banks, while capable of providing the necessary branding through the use of the individual banks’ voice scripts.

Managing conventional ‘two-factor’ authentication systems that use physical tokens carries significant business overheads, such as the end user token distribution process (including retrieval and replacement), synchronization issues and time sequencing problems – all of which contribute to considerably greater costs. ValidSoft’s solutions do not suffer these issues and provide financial institutions – and government sector bodies – with the added benefit of a significantly lower ‘Total Cost of Ownership’ whilst dramatically improving security levels.

Intellectual Property, Patents, Copyrights

Intellectual Property

Since the acquisition of ValidSoft by Elephant Talk in March 2010, considerable resources have been invested in developing and increasing ValidSoft’s product and intellectual property portfolio.

In terms of products, since March 2010, ValidSoft has considerably grown its product portfolio, the key elements of which include:

Only VALid® and VALid-POS® were marketable products at the time of the acquisition, items 3 to 6 inclusive are therefore products, developed since March 2010, which are ready for market.

Patents

As indicated above, ValidSoft’s products and technology are further protected by patent law. Indeed, at the time of the March 2010 acquisition, ValidSoft owned one UK patent (for VALid®) and had filed one patent application (for VALid-POS®).

Since then, ValidSoft has invested in research and development capabilities resulting in a significant expansion in its patent portfolio. Specifically, ValidSoft has since the acquisition made three new patent applications. These, if granted, will give ValidSoft a twenty year monopoly over the core technology used in its VALid-SSD®, VALid-CFU™ products. The third application is for a new security mechanism for high-security wireless networks (Dual-SSID authentication).

Our focus on protecting our intellectual property in the growth markets is an indicator of our strategic business focus going forward. The growth markets (South America, Asia Pacific) will be increasingly important to ValidSoft as the demographics are highly suited to our solutions and there is significant business potential

Copyright

All ValidSoft’s products are software-based technology solutions. As such, the proprietary source code used in each of the (above) products is protected by copyright and will be licensed or delivered as part of a wider service to clients.

As is common in the security software market, ValidSoft does use open standards (e.g. SSL) and in some case components of open source software. Naturally, ValidSoft does not claim ownership in such open standards or open source code; however most of ValidSoft’s software is based on proprietary (and therefore copyright-protected) code.

Data Protection and Privacy Compliance

In March 2010, ValidSoft was awarded the European Privacy Seal for the product VALid-POS®, which was deemed fully compliant with EU data protection and privacy law.

The ValidSoft platform is also built on privacy, an underlying principle in all our solutions. ValidSoft is the first security software company in the world to have been awarded this seal.The granting of the European Privacy Seal to VALid-POS®, the most recognised and stringent certification available in Europe, provides the legal compliance mechanism that enables mobile network data to be legally and securely exchanged between the entities involved in providing the VALid-POS® service; namely the Mobile Network Operators, the Banks and VALid-POS® itself.

European data protection law is the most stringent in the world and in fact forms the basis for similar legislation in many other regions. ValidSoft has commenced a legal assessment of data protection and privacy laws in other regions and countries, initially including the US, Australia and Hong Kong, where the solution has also been assessed as fully compliant.

Second Privacy Seal Awarded - The second European Privacy Seal is awarded for VALid-4F™ in September 2011, the four-factor authentication and transaction verification solution that incorporates both biometric voice verification and Proximity Correlation Logic; knowing where someone is or isn’t. The second Seal confirms the company’s ability to maintain the highest privacy standards in its work with citizens’ information when contracted by financial services organizations and government departments.

At ValidSoft, we believe in the concept of ‘privacy by design’, as described by Gartner, privacy and data protection should be embedded throughout the entire life cycle of technologies, from the early design stage to their deployment, use and ultimate disposal (European Commission: A digital agenda for Europe, 26/8/2010). Our second EuroPriSe seal confirms that our products embody that approach right across the private and public sectors.

Government Regulation

We operate in a heavily regulated industry. As a multinational telecommunications company or provider of services to carriers and operators, we are directly and indirectly subject to varying degrees of regulation in each of the jurisdictions in which we provide our services. Local laws and regulations, and the interpretation of such laws and regulations, differ significantly among the jurisdictions in which we operate. Enforcement and interpretations of these laws and regulations can be unpredictable and are often subject to the informal views of government officials. Certain European, foreign, federal, and state regulations and local franchise requirements have been, are currently, and may in the future be, the subject of judicial proceedings, legislative hearings and administrative proposals. Such proceedings may relate to, among other things, the rates we may charge for our local, network access and other services, the manner in which we offer and bundle our services, the terms and conditions of interconnection, unbundled network elements and resale rates, and could change the manner in which telecommunications companies operate. We cannot predict the outcome of these proceedings or the impact they will have on our business, revenue and cash flow.

Employees

As of December 31, 2011 we employed 120 people and retained on a long term basis, the services of 53 independent contractors. We consider relations with our employees and contractors to be good. Each of our current employees and contractors has entered into confidentiality and non-competition agreements with us. There are no collective bargaining contracts covering any of our employees.

ITEM 1A.  RISK FACTORS

Risks Related to Our Company

The substantial and continuing losses, and significant ongoing operating expenses incurred in the past few years, may require us to change our business plan.

We have incurred net losses of $25,310,735 and $92,483,360 for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively. As of December 31, 2011, we had an accumulated deficit of $180,128,371.

Our losses are the result of our continued investment in engineering, software development and build up of integration skills and intellectual property of our mobile platform and our fraud prevetion solutions as well as increase in international market development efforts. In 2011 these investments saw the beginning of a revenue ramp-up whereby the revenue contribution (Revenues minus Cost of Service) in 2011 increased more than 70% in comparison with the previous year. This was partly due to a large customer base with monthly recurring revenues coming on to our platform at the end of the 4^th quarter 2011. However, this has not yet resulted in positive cash flow and accordingly, management may consider financing as needed.

During 2011 the company received gross proceeds of $26,808,067 from exercised warrants and employee options. In 2012 up till 5 March the company received another $590,740 of gross proceed from exercised warrants and employee options.

Although the Company has previously been able to raise capital as needed, such capital may not continue to be available at all, or if available, on reasonable terms as required. Further, the terms of such financing may be dilutive to existing shareholders or otherwise on terms not favorable to the Company or existing shareholders. If we are unable to secure additional capital, as circumstances require, or do not succeed in meeting our sales objectives we may be required to change our operations.

Recent economic events and, in particular, the “credit crisis” may have an adverse effect in the markets in which we operate.

Much of our business is consumer driven, and to the extent there is a decline in consumer spending, we could experience a reduction in the demand for our services and a decrease in our revenues, net income and an increase in bad debts arising from non-payment of our trade receivables. Although we have seen a slow-down in our existing revenues, it is too early to predict what effect the current “credit crisis” may have on us and we will need to carefully monitor our operating costs as the effects of the current economic issues become known.

We currently derive a large part of our revenue from the business activity landline outsourced services.

Although our revenue mix is changing and our mobile and security services are improving operating margins, the landline based premium rate services are currently still comprise the largest revenue for the company, although with low margins. If significant changes occur in market conditions pertaining to this type of service it could have an adverse impact on our business, results of operations and financial condition.

We have recently shifted our business strategy, and we may not prove successful in our new focus

In 2006 we began to expand our focus from the market of landline telecommunication services to mobile and security services, including substantial increases of investment in software engineering, systems integration and mobile components. Even though we have built experience in serving these new customers since 2008, we have limited large scale experience in these areas, therefore we may not be able to enter and compete in these markets, or achieve profitability.

We operate in a complex regulatory environment, and failure to comply with applicable laws and regulations could adversely affect our business.

Our operations are subject to a broad range of complex and evolving laws and regulations. Because of our coverage in many countries, we must perform our services in compliance with the legal and regulatory requirements of multiple jurisdictions. Some of these laws and regulations may be difficult to ascertain or interpret and may change from time to time. Violation of such laws and regulations could subject us to fines and penalties, damage our reputation, constitute a breach of our client agreements, impair our ability to obtain and renew required licenses, and decrease our profitability or competitiveness. If any of these effects were to occur, our operating results and financial condition could be adversely affected.

The Company has identified material weaknesses in internal control over financial reporting

The Company received an adverse opinion on the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2011 because of material weaknesses identified in management’s assessment of the effectiveness of such internal control as of that date related to US GAAP and SEC reporting expertise following budget contraints and limited resources. These material weaknesses, if not remediated, create an increased risk of misstatement of the Company’s financial results, which, if material, may require future restatement thereof. A failure to implement improved internal controls, or difficulties encountered in their implementation or execution, could cause the Company future delays in its reporting obligations and could have a negative effect on the Company and the trading price of the Company’s common stock. See “Item 9A. Controls and Procedures,” for more information on the status of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting

We may not be able to integrate new technologies and provide new services in a cost-efficient manner.

The telecommunications industry is subject to rapid and significant changes in technology, frequent new service introductions and evolving industry standards. We cannot predict the effect of these changes on our competitive position, our profitability or the industry generally. Technological developments may reduce the competitiveness of our networks and our software solutions and require additional capital expenditures or the procurement of additional products that could be expensive and time consuming. In addition, new products and services arising out of technological developments may reduce the attractiveness of our services. If we fail to adapt successfully to technological advances or fail to obtain access to new technologies, we could lose customers and be limited in our ability to attract new customers and/or sell new services to our existing customers. In addition, delivery of new services in a cost-efficient manner depends upon many factors, and we may not generate anticipated revenue from such services.

Disruptions in our networks and infrastructure may result in customer dissatisfaction, customer loss or both, which could materially and adversely affect our reputation and business.

Our systems are an integral part of our customers’ business operations. It is critical for our customers, that our systems provide a continued and uninterrupted performance. Customers may be dissatisfied by any system failure that interrupts our ability to provide services to them. Sustained or repeated system failures would reduce the attractiveness of our services significantly and could result in decreased demand for our services.

We face the following risks to our networks, infrastructure and software applications:

Disruptions may cause interruptions in service or reduced capacity for customers, either of which could cause us to lose customers and/or incur expenses, and thereby adversely affect our business, revenue and cash flow.

Integration of acquisitions ultimately may not provide the benefits originally anticipated by management and may distract the attention of our personnel from the operation of our business.

We strive to broaden our solutions offerings as well as to increase the volume of voice, data and media traffic that we carry over our existing global network in order to reduce transmission costs and other operating costs as a percentage of net revenue, improve margins, improve service quality and enhance our ability to introduce new products and services. We acquired ValidSoft and we may pursue additional acquisitions in the future to further our strategic objectives. Acquisitions of businesses and customer lists involve operational risks, including the possibility that an acquisition may not ultimately provide the benefits originally anticipated by management. Moreover, we may not be successful in identifying attractive acquisition candidates, completing and financing additional acquisitions on favorable terms, or integrating the acquired business or assets into our own. There may be difficulty in integrating technologies and solutions, in migrating customer bases and in integrating the service offerings, distribution channels and networks gained through acquisitions with our own. Successful integration of operations and technologies requires the dedication of management and other personnel, which may distract their attention from the day-to-day business, the development or acquisition of new technologies, and the pursuit of other business acquisition opportunities. Therefore, successful integration may not occur in light of these factors.

Uncertainties and risks associated with international markets could adversely impact our international operations.

We have significant international operations in Europe and to a lesser extent in the Middle East and the Far East. There can be no assurance that we will be able to obtain the permits and operating licenses required for us to operate, obtain access to local transmission facilities on economically acceptable terms, or market services in international markets. In addition, operating in international markets generally involves additional risks, including unexpected changes in regulatory requirements, taxes, tariffs, customs, duties and other trade barriers, difficulties in staffing and managing foreign operations, problems in collecting accounts receivable, political risks, fluctuations in currency exchange rates, restrictions associated with the repatriation of funds, technology export and import restrictions, and seasonal reductions in business activity. Our ability to operate and grow our international operations successfully could be adversely impacted by these risks.

Because most of our business is conducted outside the United States, fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates versus the United States Dollar could adversely affect our (reported) results of operations.

Currently all of our net revenue is derived from sales and operations outside the United States whereas the reporting currency for our consolidated financial statements is the United States Dollar (USD). The local currency of each country is the functional currency for each of our respective entities operating in that country, where the Euro is the predominant currency. Considering the fact that most income and expenses are not subject to relevant exchange rate differences, it is only at a reporting level that the translation needs to be made to the reporting unit of USD. In the future, we expect to continue to derive a significant portion of our net revenue and incur a significant portion of our operating costs outside the United States, and changes in exchange rates have had and may have a significant, and potentially distorting effect (either negative or positive) on the reported results of operations, not necessarily being the result of operations in real terms. Our primary risk of loss regarding foreign currency exchange rate risk is caused by fluctuations in the following exchange rates: USD/EUR, USD/CHF, USD/HKD, USD/CNY, USD/GBP and USD/BHD.

We historically have not engaged in hedging transactions since we primarily operate in same currency countries, currently being the EUR. However, the operations of affiliates and subsidiaries in non-US countries have been funded with investments and other advances denominated in foreign currencies and more recently in USD. Historically, such investments and advances have been long-term in nature, and we accounted for any adjustments resulting from currency translation as a charge or credit to accumulate other comprehensive loss within the shareholders’ deficit section of our consolidated balance sheets. Although we have not engaged in hedging so far we continue to assess on a regular basis the possible need for hedging.

We are substantially smaller than our major competitors, whose marketing and pricing decisions, and relative size advantage, could adversely affect our ability to attract and retain customers and are likely to continue to cause significant pricing pressures that could adversely affect our net revenues, results of operations and financial condition.

The market for telecommunications (traffic) services is significantly influenced by the marketing and pricing decisions of the larger long distance, Internet access, broadband, DSL and mobile business participants. Prices in the land-line and mobile communication industries have continued to decline in recent years, and as competition continues to increase, we believe that prices are likely to continue decreasing. Customers frequently change long distance, wireless and broadband providers, and ISPs in response to the offering of lower rates or promotional incentives, increasingly as a result of bundling of various services by competitors. Moreover, competitors’ VOIP and broadband product rollouts have added further customer choice and pricing pressure. As a result, generally, customers can switch carriers and service offerings at any time. Competition in all of our traffic services markets is likely to remain intense or even increase in intensity and, as deregulatory influences are experienced in markets outside the United States, competition in non-United States markets is becoming similar to the intense competition in the United States. Many of our competitors are the principal or incumbent carriers of a country and are significantly larger than us and have substantially greater financial, technical and marketing resources, larger networks, a broader portfolio of service offerings, greater control over network and transmission lines, stronger name recognition and customer loyalty, long-standing relationships with our target customers, and lower debt leverage ratios. As a result, our ability to attract and retain customers in the traffic services may be adversely affected. Many of our competitors enjoy economies of scale that result in low cost structures for transmission and related costs that could cause significant pricing pressures within the industry. We compete on the basis of price, particularly with respect to our sales to other carriers, and also on the basis of customer service and our ability to provide a variety of telecommunications products and services. If such price pressures and bundling strategies intensify, we may not be able to compete successfully in the future, may face quarterly revenue and operating results variability, and may have heightened difficulty in estimating future revenues or results.

Our services related to communications software and information systems, outsourced solutions and value added (communication) services, including our ValidSoft fraud prevention and resolution products are highly competitive and fragmented, and we expect competition to continue to increase. We compete with telecom solution providers, independent software and service providers and the in-house IT and network departments of communications companies as well as firms that provide IT services (including consulting, systems integration and managed services), software vendors that sell products for particular aspects of a total information system, software vendors that specialize in systems for particular communications services (such as Internet, land-line and mobile services, cable, satellite and service bureaus) and companies that offer software systems in combination with the sale of network equipment. Also, in this more fragmented market, larger players exist with associated advantages described earlier which we need to compete against.

Our positioning in the marketplace as a smaller provider places a significant strain on our resources, and if not managed effectively, could result in operational inefficiencies and other difficulties.

Our positioning in the marketplace may place a significant strain on our management, operational and financial resources, and increase demand on our systems and controls. To manage this position effectively, we must continue to implement and improve our operational and financial systems and controls, invest in development & engineering, critical systems and network infrastructure to maintain or improve our service quality levels, purchase and utilize other system and solutions, and train and manage our employee base. As we proceed with our development operational difficulties could arise from additional demand placed on customer provisioning and support, billing and management information systems, product delivery and fulfillment, sales and marketing and administrative resources.

For instance, we may encounter delays or cost-overruns or suffer other adverse consequences in implementing new systems when required. In addition, our operating and financial control systems and infrastructure could be inadequate to ensure timely and accurate financial reporting.

We could suffer adverse tax and other financial consequences if U.S. or foreign taxing authorities do not agree with our interpretation of applicable tax laws.

Our corporate structure is based, in part, on assumptions about the various tax laws, including withholding tax, and other relevant laws of applicable non-U.S. jurisdictions. Foreign taxing authorities may not agree with our interpretations or reach different conclusions. Our interpretations are not binding on any taxing authority and, if these foreign jurisdictions were to change or to modify the relevant laws, we could suffer adverse tax and other financial consequences or have the anticipated benefits of our corporate structure materially impaired.

We must attract and retain skilled personnel. If we are unable to hire and retain technical, technical sales and operational employees, our business could be harmed.

Our ability to manage our growth will be particularly dependent on our ability to develop and retain an effective sales force and qualified technical and managerial personnel. We intend to hire additional employees, including software engineers, communication engineers, project managers, sales consultants, employees and operational employees. The competition for qualified technical sales, technical, and managerial personnel in the communications and software industry is intense, and we may not be able to hire and retain sufficient qualified personnel. In addition, we may not be able to maintain the quality of our operations, control our costs, maintain compliance with all applicable regulations, and expand our internal management, technical, information and accounting systems in order to support our desired growth, which could have an adverse impact on our operations. Volatility in the stock market and other factors could diminish the company’s use, and the value, of the company’s equity awards as incentives to employees, putting the company at a competitive disadvantage or forcing the company to use more cash compensation.

If we are not able to use and protect our intellectual property domestically and internationally, it could have a material adverse effect on our business.

Our ability to compete depends, in part, on our ability to use intellectual property internationally. We rely on a combination of patents, trade secrets, trademarks and licenses to protect our intellectual property. We are also subject to the risks of claims and litigation alleging infringement of the intellectual property rights of others. The telecommunications industry is subject to frequent litigation regarding patent and other intellectual property rights. We rely upon certain technology, including hardware and software, licensed from third parties. The technology licensed by us may not continue to provide competitive features and functionality. Licenses for technology currently used by us or other technology that we may seek to license in the future may not be available to us on commercially reasonable terms or at all.

Our revenue, earnings and profitability are affected by the length of our sales cycle as well length of strategic mobile partnership cycle, and longer cycles could adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.

Our business is directly affected by the length of our sales cycle and strategic mobile partnership cycles with mobile operators (MNOs). Both our telecommunications traffic services as well as our communications information systems, outsourced solutions and value added (communication) services, including our ValidSoft security solutions are relatively complex and their purchase generally involves a significant commitment of capital, with attendant delays frequently associated with large capital expenditures and procurement procedures within an organization. The purchase of these types of products typically also requires coordination and agreement across many departments within a potential customer’s and MNO’s organization. Delays associated with such timing factors could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition. In periods of economic slowdown in the communications industry, which may recur in the current economic climate, our typical sales cycle lengthens, which means that the average time between our initial contact with a prospective customer or MNO and the signing of a sales contract or MNO increases. The lengthening of our sales and strategic mobile partnership cycle could reduce growth in our revenue in the future. In addition, the lengthening of our sales and strategic mobile partnership cycle contributes to an increased cost of sales, thereby reducing our profitability.

We are dependent on a significant customer for our Premium Rate Services business and the loss of this customer could have an adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.

In 2011 the Company had a customer in the Netherlands, which accounted for Premium Rate Services revenue of $18,670,810 or (58% of the total revenue). For the same period in 2010, this same Dutch customer accounted for $22,439,478 or (60% of the total revenue). If this significant customer discontinues its relationship with us for any reason, or reduces or postpones current or expected revenues, it could have an adverse impact on our business, results of operations and financial condition although this impact is smaller than the revenue shows because of the low margin contribution of this particular (landline PRS) business. Loss of this customer, may result in adverse effect on our business, results of operation and financial conditions.

Product defects or software errors could adversely affect our business.

Design defects or software errors may cause delays in product introductions and project implementations, damage customer satisfaction and may have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition. Our software products are highly complex and may, from time to time, contain design defects or software errors that may be difficult to detect and correct. Because our products are generally used by our customers to perform critical business functions, design defects, software errors, misuse of our products, incorrect data from external sources or other potential problems within or outside of our control may arise during implementation or from the use of our products, and may result in financial or other damages to our customers, for which we may be held responsible. Although we have license agreements with our customers that contain provisions designed to limit our exposure to potential claims and liabilities arising from customer problems, these provisions may not effectively protect us against such claims in all cases and in all jurisdictions. In addition, as a result of business and other considerations, we may undertake to compensate our customers for damages caused to them arising from the use of our products, even if our liability is limited by a license or other agreement. Claims and liabilities arising from customer problems could also damage our reputation, adversely affecting our business, results of operations and the financial condition.

Risks Related to Our Industry

Changes in the regulation of the telecommunications industry could adversely affect our business, revenue or cash flow.

We operate in a heavily regulated industry. As a multinational telecommunications company or provider of services to carriers and operators, we are directly and indirectly subject to varying degrees of regulation in each of the jurisdictions in which we provide our services. Local laws and regulations, and the interpretation of such laws and regulations, differ significantly among the jurisdictions in which we operate. Enforcement and interpretations of these laws and regulations can be unpredictable and are often subject to the informal views of government officials. Certain European, foreign, federal, and state regulations and local franchise requirements have been, are currently, and may in the future be, the subject of judicial proceedings, legislative hearings and administrative proposals. Such proceedings may relate to, among other things, the rates we may charge for our local, network access and other services, the manner in which we offer and bundle our services, the terms and conditions of interconnection, unbundled network elements and resale rates, and could change the manner in which telecommunications companies operate. We cannot predict the outcome of these proceedings or the impact they will have on our business, revenue and cash flow.

There can be no assurance that future regulatory changes will not have a material adverse effect on us, or that regulators or third parties will not raise material issues with regard to our compliance or noncompliance with applicable regulations, any of which could have a material adverse effect upon us. Potential future regulatory, judicial, legislative, and government policy changes in jurisdictions where we operate could have a material adverse effect on us. Domestic or international regulators or third parties may raise material issues with regard to our compliance or noncompliance with applicable regulations, and therefore may have a material adverse impact on our competitive position, growth and financial performance.

If competitive pressures continue or intensify and/or the success of our new products is not adequate in amount or timing to offset the decline in results from our legacy businesses, we may not be able to service our debt or other obligations.

There are substantial risks and uncertainties in our future operating results, particularly as aggressive pricing and bundling strategies by certain incumbent carriers and incumbent local exchange carriers have intensified competitive pressures in the markets where we operate, and/or if we have insufficient financial resources to market our services. The aggregate anticipated margin contribution from our new mobile and security solutions may not be adequate in amount or timing to offset the declines in margin from our traditional land-line telecommunications services.

We experience intense domestic and international competition in our telecommunications traffic and fraud prevention business which may adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition

Both the land-line and mobile traffic business are intensely competitive with relatively limited barriers to entry in the more deregulated countries in which we operate and with numerous entities competing for the same customers. Recent and pending deregulation in various countries may encourage new entrants to compete, including ISPs, Mobile Network Operators, cable television companies, who would offer voice, broadband, Internet access and television, and electric power utilities who would offer voice and broadband Internet access. As competition intensifies as a result of deregulatory, market or technological developments, our results of operations and financial condition could be adversely affected, since the traffic business still constitutes a sizeable portion of our total business.

Deterioration in our relationships with facilities-based carriers could have a material adverse effect upon our telecommunications traffic business.

In our telecommunication traffic business, we primarily connect our customers’ telephone calls and data/Internet needs through access agreements with facilities-based Mobile Network Operators and land-line carriers. Many of these carriers are, or may become, our competitors. Our ability to maintain and expand our business depends on our ability to maintain favorable relationships with the facilities-based carriers from which we lease transmission lines. If our relationship with one or more of these carriers were to deteriorate or terminate, it could have a material adverse effect upon our cost structure, service quality, network diversity, results of operations and financial condition. If we experience difficulties with our third-party providers, we may not achieve desired economies of scale or otherwise be successful in growing our business.

The market for communications information systems as well as security and fraud prevention services is highly competitive and fragmented, and we expect competition to continue to increase.

We compete with independent software and service providers and with the in-house IT and network departments of  communications companies. Our main competitors include firms that provide IT services (including consulting, systems integration and managed services), software vendors that sell products for particular aspects of a total information system, software vendors that specialize in systems for particular communications services (such as Internet, wireline and wireless services, cable, satellite and service bureaus) and network equipment providers that offer software systems in combination with the sale of network equipment. We also compete with companies that provide digital commerce software and solutions.

We believe that our ability to compete depends on a number of factors, including: 

• the development by others of software products that are competitive with our products and services, 

• the price at which others offer competitive software and services, 

• the ability to make use of the networks of mobile network operators, 

• the technological changes of telecommunication operators affecting our ability to run services over their networks, 

• the ability of competitors to deliver projects at a level of quality that rivals our own, 

• the responsiveness of our competitors to customer needs, and 

• the ability of our competitors to hire, retain and motivate key personnel.

A number of our competitors have long operating histories, large customer bases, substantial financial, technical, sales, marketing and other resources, and strong name recognition. Current and potential competitors have established, and may establish in the future, cooperative relationships among themselves or with third parties 

The telecommunications industry is rapidly changing, and if we are not able to adjust our strategy and resources effectively in the future to meet changing market conditions, we may not be able to compete effectively.

The telecommunications industry is changing rapidly due to deregulation, privatization, consolidation, technological improvements, availability of alternative services such as mobile, broadband, DSL, Internet, VOIP, and wireless DSL through use of the fixed wireless spectrum, and the globalization of the world’s economies. In addition, alternative services to traditional land-line services, such as mobile, broadband, Internet and VOIP services, are a substantial competitive threat to our legacy land-line traffic business. If we do not continue to invest and exploit our contemplated plan of development of our communications information systems, outsourced solutions and value added (communication) services to meet changing market conditions, or if we do not have adequate resources, we may not be able to compete effectively. The telecommunications industry is marked by the introduction of new product and service offerings and technological improvements. Achieving successful financial results will depend on our ability to anticipate, assess and adapt to rapid technological changes, and offer, on a timely and cost-effective basis, services including the bundling of multiple services that meet evolving industry standards. If we do not anticipate, assess or adapt to such technological changes at a competitive price, maintain competitive services or obtain new technologies on a timely basis or on satisfactory terms, our financial results may be materially and adversely affected.

If we are not able to operate a cost-effective network, we may not be able to grow our business successfully.

Our long-term success depends on our ability to design, implement, operate, manage and maintain a reliable and cost-effective network. In addition, we rely on third parties to enable us to expand and manage our global network and to provide local, broadband Internet and mobile services.

Risks Related to Our Capital Stock

We could issue additional common stock, which might dilute the book value of our capital stock.

Our board of directors has authority, without action or vote of our shareholders, to issue all or a part of our authorized but unissued shares of common stock. Any such stock issuance could be made at a price that reflects a discount or a premium to the then-current trading price of our common stock. In addition, in order to raise future capital, we may need to issue securities that are convertible into or exchangeable for a significant amount of our common stock. These issuances, if any, would dilute your percentage ownership interest in the company, thereby having the effect of reducing your influence on matters on which shareholders vote. You may incur additional dilution if holders of stock options, whether currently outstanding or subsequently granted, exercise their options, or if warrant holders exercise their warrants to purchase shares of our common stock. As a result, any such issuances or exercises would dilute your interest in the company and the per share book value of the common stock that you owned, either of which could negatively affect the trading price of our common stock and the value of your investment.

Our board of directors has the power to designate a series of preferred stock without shareholder approval that could contain conversion or voting rights that adversely affect our common shareholders.

Our Articles of Incorporation authorize the issuance of capital stock including 50,000,000 undesignated preferred shares, and empowers our board of directors to prescribe by resolution and without shareholder approval a class or series of such preferred shares, including the number of shares in the class or series and the voting powers, designations, rights, preferences, restrictions and the relative rights in each such class or series thereof. The creation and issuance of any such preferred shares could dilute your voting and ownership interest in the company, the value of your investment, the trading price of our stock and any cash (or other form of consideration) that you would otherwise receive upon the liquidation of the company.

If we issue additional shares of common stock in connection with subsequent financings, this could have a dilutive effect on your voting rights.

We are authorized to issue 300,000,000 shares of capital stock, including 250,000,000 shares of common stock and 50,000,000 shares of preferred stock, of which 113,807,071 were issued and outstanding as of March 9, 2012.

Furthermore, should we decide to finance the company through the issuance of additional common stock, convertible debt or preferred stock, this may have a dilutive effect on your voting rights, the value of your investment and the trading price of the common stock. If we issue more than 20% of our outstanding common stock in any equity-based financing, we are required to call a special meeting of our shareholders to authorize the issuance of such additional shares before undertaking the issuance. As a result, we cannot assure you that our shareholders would authorize such issuance and the company could be required to seek necessary capital in an alternative manner, which may not be available on commercially reasonable terms, if at all. If the company is unable to adequately fund itself, through its operations or equity/debt financing, this would have a material adverse affect on the company as a going concern.

As a “thinly-traded” stock, large sales can place downward pressure on our stock price.

Our stock experiences periods when it could be considered “thinly traded”. Financing transactions resulting in a large number of newly issued shares that become readily tradable, or other events that cause current shareholders to sell shares, could place further downward pressure on the trading price of our stock. In addition, the lack of a robust resale market may require a shareholder who desires to sell a large number of shares to sell the shares in increments over time to mitigate any adverse impact of the sales on the market price of our stock.

Shares eligible for future sale may adversely affect the market for our common stock.

As of December 31, 2011 there are 7,868,989 options and warrants to purchase 50,865,247 shares of our common stock outstanding. If and when these securities are exercised into shares of our common stock, the number of our shares of common stock outstanding will increase. A significant portion of shares underlying the outstanding warrants are free-trading shares pursuant to certain registration statement and post-effective amendment to such registration statement filed with the SEC.Such increase in our outstanding share, and any sales of such shares, could have a material adverse effect on the market for our common stock and the market price of our common stock.

Most of the outstanding warrants which have been registered in 2010 (FORM S-1 filing date November 22, 2010 and the POST EFFECTIVE AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO FORM S-1 filing date September 1, 2011) are still outstanding and are still likely to be exercised in due course.

In addition, from time to time, certain of our shareholders may be eligible to sell all or some of their shares of common stock by means of ordinary brokerage transactions in the open market pursuant to Rule 144, promulgated under the Securities Act of 1933, which we refer to in this prospectus as the Securities Act, subject to certain limitations. In general, pursuant to Rule 144, after satisfying a six month holding period: (i) affiliated shareholders (or shareholders whose shares are aggregated) may, under certain circumstances, sell within any three month period a number of securities which does not exceed the greater of 1% of the then outstanding shares of common stock or the average weekly trading volume of the class during the four calendar weeks prior to such sale and (ii) non-affiliated shareholders may sell without such limitations, provided we are current in our public reporting obligations. Rule 144 also permits the sale of securities by non-affiliates that have satisfied a one year holding period without any limitation or restriction. Any substantial sale of our common stock pursuant to Rule 144 or pursuant to any resale prospectus may have a material adverse effect on the market price of our securities.

Excercising of the warrants will dilute your interest in the Company.

The Company has issued warrants to purchase shares of the Company’s common stock in connection with private placement financings. The exercise of such warrants will significantly dilute your interest in the Company and could have a material adverse effect on the trading price of our common stock and the value of your investment.

Because our executive officers, directors, their affiliates and certain principal shareholders own a large percentage of our voting stock, other shareholders’ voting power may be limited.

As of December 31, 2011 Steven van der Velden, Martin Zuurbier, Johan Dejager, Phil Hickman, Rijkman Groenink, Jacques Kerrest, Pat Carroll, Mark Nije and Alex Vermeulen, our directors and executive officers, their affiliates and certain principal shareholders , beneficially owned or controlled approximately 37% of our outstanding common stock. In particular, as of December 31, 2011, Rising Water Capital AG, an entity affiliated with the certain of the aforementioned individuals, beneficially owned 23% of our common stock and QAT II Investments SA, another entity affiliated with certain of our officers and directors, beneficially owned 5.3% of our outstanding stock and hold 20,893,081 warrants that at various conditions can be converted into common stock. QAT Investments SA, another entity affiliated with certain of our officers and directors, is the owner of 51.3% of Rising Water Capital. If those shareholders act together, they will have the ability to have a substantial influence on matters submitted to our shareholders for approval, including the election and removal of directors and the approval of any merger, consolidation or sale of all or substantially all of our assets. As a result, our other shareholders may have little or no influence over matters submitted for shareholder approval. In addition, the ownership of such shareholders could preclude any unsolicited acquisition of us, and consequently, adversely affect the price of our common stock. These shareholders may make decisions that are adverse to your interests.

We have no dividend history and have no intention to pay dividends in the foreseeable future.

We have never paid dividends on or in connection with our common stock and do not intend to pay any dividends to common shareholders for the foreseeable future.

ITEM 1 B.  UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS

None.

ITEM 2.  PROPERTIES

Our offices in The Netherlands are located at Schiphol Boulevard 249, 1118 BH Schiphol. The office monthly rental is $14,220 and is subject to renting until June 2015. In addition the Company rents office space at Wattstraat 52, 1171 TR, Sassenheim, The Netherlands for a monthly rental of $1,801.

                Elephant Talk Communications S.L.U. is currently renting office space at Paratge Bujonis, 17220 Sant Feliu de Guixols, (Girona) Spain, on a quarter-to-quarter rent, at a monthly rent of $5,594. In Guangzhou, China, we rent office space for a monthly rental of $7,863.

                ValidSoft Limited Ireland is currently leasing office space at Donegal Suite, Castle Buildings, Tara Street, Tullamore, Co. Offaly, Ireland on a rent at a monthly rent of $18,063. ValidSoft (U.K.) Ltd rents office space at 9 Devonshire Square, London, United Kingdom on a renewable 12 month rent for a monthly rental of $16,574.

                We also rent space for our telecom switches, servers and IT platforms at data centers (“co-locations”) at an aggregate monthly rent of $46,254. The various co-location spaces include: Amsterdam, Madrid, Barcelona, Milan, Zurich, London, Paris, Vienna, Bahrain and other locations where our telecommunications equipment are located..

We believe the facilities currently under rent are adequate for our present activities and that additional facilities are available on competitive market terms to provide for such future expansion of our operations as may be warranted.

ITEM 3.   LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

(a) Manu Ohri Litigation

In March 2009, Manu Ohri (Ohri), the Company’s former Chief Financial Officer from 2002 to 2006, commenced a lawsuit against the Company in the California Orange County Superior Court entitled Manu Ohri v. Elephant Talk Communications, Inc., Case No. 30-20009-00120609. Ohri alleged that the Company breached a 2006 written employment contract, a 2007 oral consulting contract, and otherwise owed him the reasonable value of consulting services rendered. The Company denied Ohri's allegations and commenced a cross-complaint against Ohri to, among other things, invalidate his alleged 2006 employment contract and stock bonus, and to recover the stock bonus or its fair market value.

The Company and Ohri, without any admissions of fault or liability, agreed byDecember 31, 2011 to compromise, resolve and extinguish all of their respective claims in consideration for mutual general releases and Ohri's conveyance of 300,000 shares of common stock to the Company. The lawsuit was dismissed in its entirety with prejudice without any final determination by the court on the merits of the parties’ respective claims.

(b) Chong Hing Bank Litigation

In December 2009 Chong Hing Bank Limited, fka Liu Chong Hing Bank Limited, a foreign banking services company based in Hong Kong (Bank), commenced a lawsuit in the California Orange County Superior Court called Chong Hing Bank Limited v. Elephant Talk Communications, Inc., Case No. 30-2009-00328467. The Bank alleged that it entered into various installment and term loan agreements and an overdraft account with Elephant Talk Limited (ETL), a wholly-owned Hong Kong subsidiary of Elephant Talk Communications Corp. (Company). Various former officers and directors of ETL personally guaranteed the loans and overdraft account.

The Bank alleged that ETL was in default on the loans and overdraft account, and that approximately $1,933,308 including interest and default interest was due. The Bank alleged that the Company was directly liable to repay the loans and overdraft account as a successor in interest to ETL or because the Company expressly or impliedly assumed direct liability for the loans and overdraft account. The Company denied the Bank’s allegations and asserted several affirmative defenses. The Company contended that it had no direct liability to the Bank, and that the Bank must pursue its recourse against ETL and its personal guarantors.

The Bank and the Company tried the case to the court without a jury between October, 5 and 12, 2011. The court found, among other things, that

The court entered judgment in favor of the Company and against the Bank on December 14, 2011, and awarded the Company $5,925.41 in costs. The judgment became final on February 16, 2012.

(c) Rescission of the Purchase Agreement of May 24, 2004 of New Times Navigation Limited.

As previously described in our 2004 Annual Report we and New Times Navigation Limited mutually agreed to terminate this purchase agreement. We returned the received shares of New Times Navigation Limited to the concerned shareholders and received back 90,100 of our common stock out of the 204,000 issued by us for the purchase. In addition we issued 37 unsecured convertible promissory notes for a total amount of $3,600,000. On our request 21 notes were returned with a total value of $2,040,000.

We are presently seeking relief from the High Court of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region against the holders of the unreturned shares to return a total of 113,900 common shares (valued at $381,565) and also to have them return the remaining 18 unsecured convertible promissory notes representing a total amount of $1,740,000 and rescind the purchase agreement. The case is currently pending.

PART II

ITEM 4.  MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES

Not applicable.

ITEM 5.  MARKET FOR THE REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED SHAREHOLDER MATTERS, AND PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

As of December 5, 2011 our common stock is listed for quotation on the NYSE AMEX under the symbol “ETAK”.  The following table sets forth the high and low closing price per share as per closing of each trading day as quoted on the NYSE AMEX and published on the internet by www.nasdaq.com for each quarter from January 1, 2010 through December 31, 2011. These quotations reflect prices between dealers and do not include retail mark-ups, mark-downs or commissions and may not reasonably represent actual transactions.

At December 31, 2011, we had approximately 4,258 record holders of our common stock.

Dividends

We have not declared any cash dividends since inception and do not anticipate paying any dividends in the foreseeable future. The payment of dividends is within the discretion of our Board of Directors and will depend on our earnings, capital requirements, financial condition, and other relevant factors. There are no restrictions that currently limit our ability to pay dividend on our common stock other than those generally imposed by applicable state law.

Securities Authorized for Issuance under Equity Compensation Plans

Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities

Shares issued in 2011

On October 26, 2011 the company issued 122,857 shares in lieu of cash compensation to certain directors and executive officers. No proceeds were received. 

The above-referenced securities were offered and sold pursuant to exemptions from registration provided by the Securities Act.

Shares issued (or cancelled) in 2012

On January 6, 2012 the company cancelled 300,000 shares from their register relating to the return of 300,000 shares as a result of the dismissal of a lawsuit against a former Chief Financial Officer. See also Note 25.

8% Senior Secured Convertible Notes in 2012

On March 29, 2012, we sold certain 8% senior secured convertible notes in the principal amount of $8.8 million to certain purchasers. See Footnote 29 to the Financial Statements.

Warrants issued in 2011

No warrants (other than replacement warrants for the remaining underlying shares after a partial excercise) were issued in the three month preceding the closing of this quarter.

Stock Performance Graph

The graph below compares the cumulative total stockholder return on ETAK common stock with the cumulative return of the NASDAQ Comp. Index (IXIC) and the NASDAQ Telecom Index (IXUT) for each of the five fiscal years ended December 31, 2011, assuming an investment of $100 at the beginning of such period.

The table below shows $100 invested on December 31, 2006 in stock or index:

ITEM 6.  SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

The selected consolidated financial data presented below should be read in conjunction with the Consolidated financial statements, the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements and the Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, which are elsewhere included in this form 10-K.

ITEM 7.  MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Forward-Looking Statements

Any forward looking statements made herein are based on current expectations of the Company, involve a number of risks and uncertainties and should not be considered as guarantees of future performance. The factors that could cause actual results to differ materially include: interruptions or cancellation of existing contracts, inability to integrate acquisitions, impact of competitive products and pricing, product demand and market acceptance risks, the presence of competitors with greater financial resources than the Company, product development and commercialization risks, changes in governmental regulations, and changing economic conditions in developing countries and an inability to arrange additional debt or equity financing.

Overview

The following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with our financial statements and notes thereto and the other financial information included elsewhere in this document.

Application of Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

Revenue Recognition and Deferred Revenue

The Company’s revenue recognition policies are in compliance with ASC 605, Revenue Recognition (“ASC 605”) (formerly, Staff Accounting Bulletin (SAB) 104). Revenue is recognized only when the price is fixed or determinable, persuasive evidence of arrangement exists, the service is performed and the collectability of the resulting receivable is reasonably assured. The Company derives revenue from activities as a fixed-line and mobile services provider with its network and its own switching technology. Revenue represents amounts earned for telecommunication services provided to customers (net of value added tax and inter-company revenue). The Company recognizes revenue from prepaid calling cards as the services are provided. Payments received before all of the relevant criteria for revenue recognition are satisfied are recorded as deferred revenue. Deferred revenue represents amounts received from the customers against future sales of services since the Company recognizes revenue upon performing the services.

Stock-based Compensation

Effective January 1, 2006, we adopted the provisions of ASC 718 “Compensation-Stock Compensation”, using the prospective approach. As a result, we recognize stock-based compensation expense for only those awards that are granted subsequent to December 31, 2005 and any previously existing awards that are subject to variable accounting, including certain stock options that were exercised with notes in 2003, until the awards are exercised, forfeited, or contractually expire in accordance with the prospective method and the transition rules of ASC 718. Under ASC 718, stock-based awards granted after December 31, 2005, are recorded at fair value as of the grant date and recognized as expense over the employee’s requisite service period (the vesting period, generally three years), which we have elected to amortize on a straight-line basis.

Business Combinations

We use the purchase method of accounting for business combinations and the results of the acquired businesses are included in the income statement from the date of acquisition. The purchase price includes the direct costs of the acquisition. However, beginning in fiscal 2009, acquisition-related costs will be expensed as incurred, in accordance with ASC 805 “Business Combinations”Amounts allocated to intangible assets are amortized over their estimated useful lives; no amounts are allocated to in-progress research and development. Goodwill represents the excess of consideration paid over the net identifiable business assets acquired.

Intangible Assets and Impairment of long Lived Assets

In accordance with ASC 350, intangible assets are carried at cost less accumulated amortization and impairment charges. Intangible assets are amortized on a straight-line basis over the expected useful lives of the assets, between three and ten years. Other intangible assets are reviewed for impairment in accordance with ASC 360, “Property and Equipment”, annually, or whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of such assets may not be recoverable. Measurement of any impairment loss for long-lived assets and identifiable intangible assets that management expects to hold and use is based on the amount of the carrying value that exceeds the fair value of the asset.

Goodwill Impairment

On September 15, 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-08, Intangibles – Goodwill and Other, which simplifies how an entity is required to test goodwill for impairment. This ASU would allow an entity to first assess qualitative factors to determine whether it is necessary to perform the two-step quantitative goodwill impairment test. Under the ASU, an entity would not be required to calculate the fair value of a reporting unit unless the entity determines, based on a qualitative assessment, that it is more likely than not that its fair value is less than its carrying amount. The ASU includes a number of factors to consider in conducting the qualitative assessment. The ASU is effective for annual and interim goodwill impairment tests performed for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2011. The adoption of this accounting standard in 2011 had no material impact on the Company’s financial statements.

Impact of Accounting Pronouncements

In June 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-05, Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Presentation of Comprehensive Income. ASU 2011-05 increases the prominence of other comprehensive income in financial statements. Under ASU 2011-05, companies will have the option to present the components of net income and comprehensive income in either one or two consecutive financial statements. ASU 2011-05 eliminates the option to present other comprehensive income in the statement of changes in equity and is applied retrospectively. For public companies, ASU 2011-05 is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2011.The Company does not expect this to have a material impact on its financial statements.

ASU 2011-05 is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2011. The Company does not expect this to have a material impact on its financial statements.

In May 2011, the FASB issued additional guidance on fair value measurements that clarifies the application of existing guidance on disclosure requirements, changes certain fair value measurement principles and requires additional disclosures about fair value measurements. The updated guidance is effective on a prospective basis for financial statements issued for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2011. The Company does not expect this to have a material impact on its financial statements.

Services and Solutions

Elephant Talk is an international provider of business software and outsourced services to the telecommunications and financial services industry.

Full-MVNE/MVNO Mobile Services – wholesale services and managed services to Mobile Network Operators and Virtual Network Operators.

The company enables both mobile carriers and virtual operators to offer a full suite of products, delivery platforms, support services, superior industry expertise and high quality customer service without substantial upfront investments from clients. Elephant Talk provides global telecommunication companies, mobile network operators, banks, supermarkets, consumer product companies, media firms, and other businesses a full suite of products and services that enables them to fully provide telecom services as part of their business offerings. The company offers various dynamic products that include remote health care, credit card fraud prevention, mobile internet ID security, multi-country discounted phone services, loyalty management services, and a whole range of other emerging customized mobile services.

As of 2007 we positioned ourselves as an MVNE to MNOs and MVNOs offering a wide range of mobile enabling/enhancing services through sophisticated, proprietary technology supported by multi-country operations with a focus on business to business, outsourcing /partnering strategy. Important milestones in this respect are:

ValidSoft – Fraud Prevention and Security Software Solutions

ValidSoft is a subsidiary of Elephant Talk Communications Corp. and is a thought and technology leader in providing solutions to counter electronic fraud relating to card, the internet, and telephone channels. ValidSoft's solutions are at the cutting edge of the market and are used to verify the authenticity of both parties to a transaction (Mutual Authentication), and the integrity of the transaction itself (Transaction Verification) for the mass market, in a highly cost effective and secure manner, yet easy to use and intuitive.

As the banking and payments world, in particular, begins to converge onto smart telecommunications-based devices, the ValidSoft integrated security platform, built solely on a real-time zero client-footprint model, allows organizations to leverage these convergence devices to provide visible and invisible security layers for all transaction channels, whilst also providing protection where the device itself is the channel.

This integrated platform, using proprietary technologies including Out-of-Band authentication and transaction verification, Proximity Correlation Logic, Pseudo Device Theft detection and biometric voice verification, allows organizations to protect all of their customer transaction channels within a single platform. This combination of technologies provides solutions from simply detecting SIM Swap fraud through to the world’s first commercially available Four-factor authentication solution. Internet banking, M-banking, Mobile Wallet, Mobile Payments, Card-present, card-not-present, NFC, citizen online services and more are all supported through either one or more of these integrated telecommunications-based techniques. The key operational highlights:

Landline network outsourcing services

Through our fixed line telecom infrastructure and our centrally operated and managed ET Boss and Infitel platform, the Company also provides traditional landline services like Carrier Select and Carrier Pre-Select Services, Toll Free and Premium Rate Services to the business market.

Support technology

Business Support and Operational Support System (“ET BOSS”) and Intelligent Network – IN – (“Infitel”)

Through our European and Chinese development centers, we develop in-house telecom and media related systems and software, centered related to companies’ proprietary platforms ET BOSS and IN

Electronic fraud prevention products: VALid-POS®, VALid®, VALid-SVP™ and VALid-4F®

Our subsidiary ValidSoft has given us ownership of technology and intellectual property to combat fraud relating to card, the internet, and telephone channels. ValidSoft solutions are marketed under VALid-POS®, VALid® and VALid-4F®. For its biometrics based product it trades under VALid-SVP™.

Telecom infrastructure & network

We currently operate a switch-based telecom network with national licenses and direct fixed line interconnects with the Incumbents/National Telecom Operators in seven (7) European countries, one (1) in the Middle East (Bahrain), and partnerships with telecom operators in Scandinavia, Poland and Germany, and France. To this we have added mobile access coverage in order to cater for our mobile services and solutions. Our first mobile partners are T-Mobile in the Netherlands, Vodafone Enabler in Spain, KPN in Belgium. In Saudi Arabia we partnered with Zain KSA to provide our mobile platform services.

Results of Operations

Our results of operations for the year ended December 31, 2011, consisted of the operations of Elephant Talk Communications Corp., its wholly-owned subsidiaries, Elephant Talk Limited and its subsidiaries, Elephant Talk Europe Holding BV and its subsidiaries, Elephant Talk Global Holding BV and its subsidiaries and ValidSoft Ltd and its subsidiaries.

Although the vast majority of our business activities are carried out in Euros, we report our financial statements in US dollars (“USD”). The conversion of Euros and USD leads to period-to-period fluctuations in our reported USD results arising from changes in the exchange rate between the USD and the Euro. Generally, when the USD strengthens relative to the Euro, it has an unfavorable impact on our reported revenue and income and a favorable impact on our reported expenses. Conversely, when the USD weakens relative to the Euro, it produces a favorable impact on our reported revenue and income, and an unfavorable impact on our reported expenses. The above fluctuations in the USD/Euro exchange rate therefore result in currency translation effects (not to be confused with real currency exchange effects), which impact our reported USD results and may make it difficult to determine actual increases and decreases in our revenue and expenses which are attributable to our actual operating activities. In addition to reporting changes in our financial statements in USD as per the requirements of United States generally accepted accounting principles (“US GAAP”), we also highlight the impact of any material currency translation effect by providing a comparison between periods on a constant currency basis, where the most recent USD/Euro exchange rate is applied to previous periods. Management believes that this allows for greater insight into the trends and changes in our business for the reported periods. Also, since we carry out our business activities primarily in Euro’s we do not currently engage in hedging activities.

The constant currency analysis presented whithin the comparison of the year-to-year results is calculated by using the average exchange rates over the year 2011. The same exchange rates are used in the income statement 2011. The following table shows the USD equivalent of the major currencies:

Adjusted EBITDA

In order to provide investors additional information regarding our financial results, we are disclosing Adjusted EBITDA, a non-GAAP financial measure. We employ Adjusted EBITDA, defined as earnings before derivative accounting, such as warrant liabilities and conversion feature expensing, income taxes, depreciation and amortization and stock-based compensation, for several purposes, including as a measure of our operating performance. We use Adjusted EBITDA because it removes the impact of items not directly resulting from our core operations, thus allowing us to better assess whether the elements of our growth strategy are yielding the desired results. Accordingly, we believe that Adjusted EBITDA provides useful information for investors and others which allows them to better understand and evaluate our operating results.

A reconciliation of Adjusted EBITDA to net loss, the most directly comparable measure under U.S. GAAP, for each of the fiscal periods indicated, is as follows:

(Note to Adjusted EBITDA: 2009 figures do not include ValidSoft and 2010 figures include ValidSoft as of 1 April 2010).

Impact in constant currency of the inclusion of ValidSoft financials for the year ended December 31, 2010:

Comparison of Years Ended December 31, 2011 and 2010

Revenue for the year ended December 31, 2011 was $32,232,981, a decrease of $4,935,370 or 13.28%, compared to $37,168,351 for the year ending December 31, 2010. The decrease in revenue was the result of the expected continued landline calling minutes related revenue decrease in our low margin legacy landline business by $7,886,899 (or 22.97%), which was partly off-set by the increase in revenues of our higher margin mobile and security solutions business of $2,951,530 (or 104.42%) compared to 2010. The increase in our higher margin mobile and security solutions business is mainly due to the increasing revenues of already existing customers  and a customer with a large consumer base with monthly recurring revenues coming on to our platform at the end of the 4th quarter 2011.

Despite these total revenue declines, Revenue minus Cost of Service increased because of the higher margin in the mobile and security business.

Cost of Service. Cost of service includes origination, termination, network and billing charges from telecommunications operators, out payment costs to content and information providers, network costs, data center costs, facility cost of hosting network and equipment and cost in providing resale arrangements with long distance service providers, cost of leasing transmission facilities, international gateway switches for voice, and data transmission services.

Cost of Service for the year ended December 31, 2011 was $28,723,265, a decrease of $6,397,651 or 18.22%, compared to $35,120,916 for the year ended December 31, 2010. The decrease in cost of service was mainly caused by the decrease in revenues in our low margin legacy landline business. Cost of service as a percent of revenue was 89.1% and 94.5% for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively.

Management expects cost of service to decline further as a percent of revenue as a greater proportion of future revenue is comprised of our mobile services and ValidSoft solutions, which have a substantially lower cost of service than our traditional landline business.

Selling, general and administrative expenses. Selling, general and administrative (“SG&A”) expense for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010, were $16,589,649 and $9,620,322, respectively. SG&A expenses increased by $6,969,327, or 72.44%, in 2011 compared to 2010. This was led by an increase of 32.3% in our staffing levels on December 31, 2011 compared to December 31, 2010, largely in sales and European hires, as well as by higher marketing and selling costs. The increases in staffing levels and higher marketing and selling costs are mainly related to expected future revenues.

Non-cash compensation to officers, directors, consultants and employees. Non-cash compensation for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010 was $6,818,905 and $5,588,392, respectively. The increase is primarily attributable to higher staffing levels and the inclusion of ValidSoft.

Non-cash compensation is comprised of:

Depreciation and amortization. Depreciation and amortization for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010, was $5,254,708 and $5,312,469 respectively. Depreciation and amortization expenses decreased by $57,761 or 1.09% in 2011 compared to 2010.

Intangible assets impairment charge. The December 31, 2011 consolidated balance sheet includes: $12.7 million of intangible assets, net, and $13.3 million of fixed assets, net. Management updated its analysis of intangible assets and long-lived assets as of December 31, 2011. As a result of this assessment, we determined that the value of certain specific intangible assets was higher than the estimated recoverable value, and as a result, incurred an impairment charge of approximately $522,726 in 2011.In the evaluation of its intangible assets, the company estimated the undiscounted future cash flows directly associated with the asset and compared these to the asset's carrying amount. The assets impaired pertained primarily to Landline Business a specific two stage dialing product in order to make international long distance calls. The two stage dialing business is facing regulated tariffs by the European Union and competition from internet based alternatives like Skype. The impaired intangible assets consist of a brandname and business contracts. The segment where these intangible are part of is the Landline business.

.

We have acquired several companies in the last few years and our current business strategy includes continuing to make additional acquisitions in the future. These acquisitions may continue to give rise to goodwill and other intangible assets which will need to be assessed for impairment from time to time.

Other Income and Expenses. Interest income was $106,721 and $239,713 for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010. Interest income was interest received on bank balances.

Interest expense was $201,184 and $1,802,804 for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010 respectively. High levels of interest expense in 2010 were due to higher levels of debt financing and less favorable interest rates. Interest charges decreased with the automatic conversion of the QAT 2010 bridge loan and 2009 promissory notes on November 19, 2010.

Other income was $460,000 and $0 for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010 respectively. Other income was the result of the release of a FIN48 provision following a successful abatement request with the IRS for the year 2007. Following this success full abatement the company also decided to release a similar provision it had made for a potential IRS fine for the year 2008.

Non-controlling Interest. Our majority owned subsidiaries are Elephant Talk Communications PRS U.K. Limited, Elephant Talk Communications Premium Rate Services Netherlands B.V., Elephant Talk Middle East & Africa (Holding) W.L.L., Elephant Talk Middle East & Africa (Holding) Jordan L.L.C., Elephant Talk Middle East & Africa Bahrain W.L.L., Elephant Talk Middle East & Africa FZ-LLC and  ET-UTS NV.

We incurred a non-controlling interest charge attributable to minority shareholders’ interest for the years ended December 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010 of $0 and $5,046 respectively.

Net Loss. Net Loss was $25,310,735 and $92,483,360 for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010 respectively. The improvement of $67,172,625 was primarily the result of high non-cash financing charges in 2010.

Other Comprehensive Income (Loss). We record foreign currency translation gains and losses as other comprehensive income or loss. Other comprehensive Income (Loss) for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010 was ($624,275) and ($1,655,917) respectively. This change is primarily attributable to the translation effect resulting from the substantial fluctuations in the USD/Euro exchange rates.

Constant currency Comparison of Years Ended December 31, 2011 and 2010