ECOLOCAP SOLUTIONS INC. - FORM 10-K

Attached files

file	filename
EXCEL - IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT - ECOLOCAP SOLUTIONS INC.	Financial_Report.xls
EX-31.2 - SARBANES-OXLEY 302 CERTIFICATION - PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER. - ECOLOCAP SOLUTIONS INC.	exh31-2.htm
EX-32.2 - SARBANES-OXLEY 906 CERTIFICATION - CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER. - ECOLOCAP SOLUTIONS INC.	exh32-2.htm
EX-32.1 - SARBANES-OXLEY 906 CERTIFICATION - CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER. - ECOLOCAP SOLUTIONS INC.	exh32-1.htm
EX-31.1 - SARBANES-OXLEY 302 CERTIFICATION - PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER. - ECOLOCAP SOLUTIONS INC.	exh31-1.htm

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D. C. 20549

FORM 10-K

[X]	ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2011

Commission File Number: 000-31165

ECOLOCAP SOLUTIONS INC.

(Exact Name of Small Business Issuer as specified in its charter)

NEVADA

(State or other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization)

1250 S. Grove Ave, Suite 308

Barrington, Illinois, 60010

(Address of principal executive offices)

866-479-7041

(Issuer’s telephone number, including area code)

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:	Securities registered pursuant to section 12(g) of the Act:
None	Common Stock

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. YES [ ] NO [X]

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act: YES [X] NO [ ]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. YES [X] NO [ ]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). YES [ ] NO [X]

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. [ ]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large Accelerated Filer	[ ]	Accelerated Filer	[ ]
Non-accelerated Filer	[ ]	Smaller Reporting Company	[X]
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). YES [ ] NO [X]

State the aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates computed by reference to the price at which the common equity was sold, or the average bid and asked price of such common equity, as of June 30, 2011: $3,403,755.

As of March 30, 2012, 270,837,755 shares of the registrant’s common stock were outstanding.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

		Page

PART I

Item 1.	Business.	3
Item 1A.	Risk Factors.	6
Item 1B.	Unresolved Staff Comments.	6
Item 2.	Properties.	6
Item 3.	Legal Proceedings.	6


PART II

Item 5.	Market for the Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholders Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities.	7
Item 6.	Selected Financial Data.	9
Item 7.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operation.	9
Item 7A.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.	12
Item 8.	Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.	12
Item 9.	Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure.	28
Item 9A.	Controls and Procedures.	28
Item 9B.	Other Information.	29


PART III

Item 10.	Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance.	29
Item 11.	Executive Compensation.	33
Item 12.	Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters.	35
Item 13.	Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence.	36
Item 14.	Principal Accountant Fees and Services.	37


PART IV

Item 15.	Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules.	38

Signatures		43

Exhibit Index		44

-2-

PART I.

ITEM 1. BUSINESS.

We plan to develop economically feasible renewable energy.

History of the Business

We were incorporated in the State of Nevada on March 18, 2004, as Cygni Systems Corporation. We were originally formed with the intent of raising funds and entering into business as a software design company. From the date of our incorporation until June 17, 2005, we were in the development stage of online and network security management software and online and network security consulting services.

A change of control occurred on June 17, 2005. On August 19, 2005, we entered into and closed a Share Exchange Agreement (the “XL Share Exchange Agreement”) with XL Generation AG. Pursuant to the terms of the XL Share Exchange Agreement, we acquired all of the issued and outstanding shares of common stock of XL Generation AG. On August 23, 2005, we filed a Certificate of Amendment with the State of Nevada, changing our name to “XL Generation International Inc.”

XL Generation was the holding company of a Swiss entity, XL Generation AG, which was the marketer of an artificial sport surface called “XL Turf.” We aspired to become a leading global force in the artificial turf and flooring markets by building both the strength of the XL brand and strategic partnerships with key regional turf and flooring providers. Our vision was to develop a variety of products other than for sports, aimed at all types of play space, including for landscape and playgrounds. Due to litigation and because of the severe deterioration of our brand name and the poor quality of the products produced at XL Generation AG’s request by its subcontract manufacturer, who produce a poor quality which did not meet the specifications XL Generation AG requested. Also for each shipment the quality surveyor’s at the production plant failed causing deterioration of the brand name XL Turf and XL Generation AG in particular in the European market., our board of directors decided that it was in our best interest to initiate a complete and total withdrawal from the artificial flooring sector, artificial turf and all related business.

Following our withdrawal from the artificial flooring sector, artificial turf and all related business and after identifying new business opportunities, we changed our name from “XL Generation International Inc.” to “Ecolocap Solutions Inc.”

On November 13, 2007, we filed a Certificate of Amendment with the State of Nevada, changing our name to “EcoloCap Solutions Inc.” Our shares of common stock are traded on the Bulletin Board operated by the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority under the symbol ECOS.

On September 10, 2009, the Company completed the acquisition of 55% of Micro Bubble Technologies (MBT), a provider of Nano technology, for a purchase price of $7,172,000 in common shares of the Company. This acquisition was funded from common stock. The final purchase price remains subject to post-closing working capital adjustments. The purchase price allocation is considered preliminary; additional adjustments may be recorded during the allocation period specified by “SFAS 141”, as additional information becomes known or payments are made.

Micro Bubble developed and manufactures M-Fuel, an innovative suspension fuel that far exceeds all conventional fuels’ costs and efficiencies and the NPW machine that converts waste organic oils into biodiesel and pure glycerine. It also developed the Carbon Nano Tube Battery (CNT-Battery), and the Nano Li- Battery both fully recyclable, rechargeable batteries that far exceeds the performance capabilities of any existing battery on the

-3-

market at this time. The acquisition of this business will enable the Company to expand its reference in an integrated and complementary network of environmentally focused technology companies that utilize advanced nanotechnology to design, develop, manufacture and sell cleaner alternative energy products.

On November 4, 2010, the Company transferred all of its shares of Ecolocap Solutions (Canada) Inc. to DT Crystal Holdings Ltd in exchange of the reduction of $100,000 of its debts.

Our Business

We are a development stage company. Ecolocap Solutions Inc. is an integrated and complementary network of environmentally focused technology companies that utilize advanced nanotechnology to design, develop, manufacture and sell cleaner alternative energy products. We bring together the technology, engineering, and operational management for the successful development of environmentally significant products and projects. Our business approach combines science, innovation, and market-ready solutions to achieve environmentally sustainable and economically advantageous, power and energy management practices in the following areas:

MBT M-Fuel

EcoloCap Solutions Inc., through its subsidiary Micro Bubble Technologies Inc. (MBT), developed and manufactures M-Fuel, an innovative emulsion fuel that far exceeds all conventional fuels’ costs and efficiencies. This environmentally-friendly and economical product is designed to offer fully scalable and customizable fuel solutions that will increase efficiency, lower operating costs, and reduce emissions. M -Fuel is a emulsion of 60% heavy oil, 38%, and a 2% stabilizing additive for external combustion engines and 70% heavy oil, 28% water and 2% stabilizing additive. The production of M-Fuel takes place in our Nano Processing Units (NPU), a self contained device that is sized for output. The NPU’s can be configured to operate in conjunction with an engine or burner to sully M-Fuel on demand, or pre-manufactured for delivery. Independent tests conducted in the US, Korea and Australia demonstrate M-Fuels unique burning process facilitates increased efficiency, resulting in average reduced NOx emissions by 60%, particulate emissions by 98% reduces fuel consumption by 30% to 40%%, and cut costs by up to 20%..

The Clean Air Act specifies that any emulsion diesel fuel that has 14% or greater water is eligible for a 19.7% rebate on the fuel tax. The end user of M-Fuel may in some cases, save money on prices for diesel.

Nano Li Battery

Independent tests have demonstrated that the Nano Li battery utilizing new anode and cathode technologies and only requiring 10% by weight Li is the least expensive and highest Whr/Kg of any comparable type battery at 25% of the cost/KwHr. Independent tests

Volumetric energy density	Wh/l	496.29
Mass	Kg	5.45
Mass energy density	Wh/Kg	215.80
Watt power density	W/kg
Voltage	V	4.20

NPW Machine

NPW Series biodiesel processing machines will allow customers to utilize cheaper waste feedstock (high free fatty acid organic oils such as trap grease, beef tallow, chicken fat, algae), reduce production cost /gallon, and produce biodiesel exceeding all ASTM specs. Most equipment providers must first approve feedstock to ensure biodiesel quality. We do not need to approve the biodiesel feedstock and there is no limit on the degree of waste oil that can be processed (up to 99.2% FFA Feedstock). A secondary process is recovers glycerin as a production by product. We also have an additional Glycerin Refining Machine that can make several grades of glycerin to meet applications designated by the customer.

-4-

Our Current Operations

Ecolocap has sold its first NPW system is presently undergoing contract negotiations for multiple installations.

The Nano Li Battery promise to change the panorama of the energy storage market in the near-term by offering superior performance compared to existing lithium-ion batteries and greatly reduced prices. Several industries, including the telecommunications industry, have been receptive with either substantial orders or serious demonstrations of interest. We have signed MOU’s for production facilities in Vietnam and Holland.

MBT has also developed a new process that blends non-miscible liquids (oil and water) on a submicron level in order to create a new non-emulsified fuel product that it calls EM-Fuel. Tests conducted in the City of Brisbane, Australia have verified all claims to emissions and savings. We are in the process of signing a distribution contract for M-Fuel in Australia and New Zealand. Additionally, contracts are under negotiation for a large power plant in Chile and possible implementation of M-Fuel in the Ukraine.

Given the turmoil in the Mideast M-Fuel is being evaluated by African and Caribbean nations where the diesel is the main source of power generation as the immediate way to reduce costs, and as an ancillary benefit is the reduction of emission.

In December 2010, MBT announced that it has signed an agreement with Triad Constructors, Inc. to utilize Triad for the sales, distribution, installation and commissioning of the new NPW biodiesel processing units sold.

In April 2011, MBT announced the execution of a purchase agreement with Empresas Energy Partners Chile Generadora de Energia LTDA (EPC) for the shipment of an NPU-10 series fuel emulsion plant to Degan, Chile to produce M-Fuel for 30-45 days starting the first week of may. Upon successful completion of the testing an additional three NPU-60 fuel emulsion plants will be purchased to provide fuel for the entire 40 megawatt station. EPC estimates their demand for M-Fuel will facilitate the need for a minimum of 36 NPU-60 fuel emulsions.

In May 2011, MBT announced that it has signed a distribution agreement with Nano-Tech Industries Pty Ltd, of Acacia Ridge, Australia, to distribute all of its products in Australia, New Zealand and the Pacific Islands.

In July 2011, MBT shipped to Empresas Energy Partners Chile Generadora de Energia LTDA (EPC), for testing purpose, an NPU-10 series fuel emulsion plant to Degan, Chile to produce M-Fuel.

Our Vision

EcoloCap brings together the innovation, engineering, and industry knowledge to create products that have a significant—constructive and quantifiable—impact on the environment, while cost-effectively enhancing intrinsic performance characteristics. With these ground-breaking alternative energy products, EcoloCap is uniquely positioned to unleash the power of nanotechnology and revolutionize the world largest markets.

EcoloCap Solutions Inc. is an integrated and complementary network of environmentally focused technology companies that utilize advanced nanotechnology to design, develop, manufacture and sell cleaner alternative energy products. We bring together the technology, engineering, and operational management for the successful development of environmentally significant products and projects. Our business approach combines science, innovation, and market-ready solutions to achieve environmentally sustainable and economically advantageous, power and energy management practices in the following areas:

* On-Road Transportation: EV/PHEV, trucks, buses, public fleets, mass transit fleets, private fleets

* Off-Road Transportation: marine engines, locomotives, construction equipment

* Power Generation: cell towers, data centers, apartments complexes, hospitals, universities

-5-

* Grid Stabilization: utilities, energy services, systems operators, merchant operators, municipalities

* Industrial: power plants, manufacturing plants, boilers, furnaces, turbines, driers, kilns

* Government: military, defense contractors, systems integrators, aerospace, propulsion systems

Regulation

The MBT batteries will be undergoing full destructive testing and should be completed by the end of the 3rd quarter. At the present time the only regulations that may affect the MBT Nano Li battery is the transportation by passenger plane. Once destruction testing demonstrates the safety of the batteries they should be allowed to be transported passenger plane.

We will be seeking final approval by the EPA for the M-Fuel additive.

Competition

There are many battery manufactures and types of batteries. The battery market is defined by the mission and cost. To date there is no direct comparison for our batteries and we plan to initially impact the mission sensitive projects.

The M-Fuel technology is unique and is superior to any type of emulsion fuel at reduced selling process than the pre-processed fuel. In our process we recover the free SOx and NOx present in fuel before processing. No other emulsion process eliminates heavy metals, S and N from the fuel prior to processing of the fuel. This process will also be marketed as a stand alone process for the elimination of Sulphur from fuel oil.

The bio-diesel processing system makes diesel biodiesel from wasted fats. The MBT process is superior to competing process and at 25% of the cost. The MBT process is the only process that produces 99% pure glycerine by product.

The markets in which we do business are highly competitive. In the market in which we operate, there are many competitors, some of which are significantly larger, have access to much more important resources or capital than us, or have established reputations among potential customers.

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS.

We are a smaller reporting company as defined by Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act and are not required to provide the information under this item.

ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS.

None.

ITEM 2. PROPERTIES.

We do not own any real estate. We do not plan on investing in real estate in the near future. We are currently renting office space in Barrington IL for 1,924 per month. The Company believes that its current office facilities will not be sufficient for the foreseeable future.

ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS.

We are not presently a party to any litigation.

-6-

PART II

ITEM 5.

MARKET FOR THE REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES.

Market Information

Our shares of common stock are traded on the Bulletin Board operated by the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) under the symbol “ECOS”.

The following table sets forth for the periods indicated the high and low close prices for the Common Shares in U.S. Dollars. These quotations reflect only inter dealer prices, without retail mark up, mark down or commissions and may not represent actual transactions.

2011		High		Low
December 31, 2011	$	0.022	$	0.001
September 30,2011	$	0.032	$	0.020
June 30, 2011	$	0.040	$	0.021
March 31, 2011	$	0.075	$	0.030

2010		High		Low
December 31, 2010	$	0.10	$	0.02
September 30,2010	$	0.20	$	0.095
June 30, 2010	$	0.47	$	0.16
March 31, 2010	$	0.50	$	0.26

Holders

As of March 31, 2012, we had one hundred fifty stockholders of record.

Dividends

We have never declared or paid cash dividends. There are currently no restrictions which limit our ability to pay dividends in the future.

Securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans

On March 31, 2008, we filed a new Equity Incentive Plan (the “Plan”), effective as of March 31, 2008. On March 30, 2006, we adopted the 2006 Equity Incentive Plan (the “Plan”), effective as of March 24, 2006. Under the Plan, we may issue options, stock appreciation rights, restricted shares, deferred shares or performance shares. The maximum number of such shares of our common stock that may be issued under the Plan is 2,000,000 shares. Our officers, directors, employees and consultants, as well as those of our subsidiaries, may participate in the Plan, as our Compensation Committee may deem to be advisable and in our best interests. No one individual may be awarded options to purchase more than 500,000 shares in any one fiscal year. No one individual may be granted more than 250,000 shares in any one fiscal year. The terms and conditions of each grant shall be as set forth in an award agreement approved by the Compensation Committee.

-7-

Equity Compensation Plan Information

Plan category	Number of securities issued upon exercise of outstanding options, warrants and rights	Weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options, warrants and rights	Number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans (excluding securities reflected in column (a))
	(a)	(b)	(c)

Equity compensation plans approved by security holders	n/a	n/a	n/a

Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders	365,000	1.10	1,465,000

Total	365,000	1.10	1,465,000

Registration Statement

On November 17, 2010, a Registration Statement on Form S-8 (the “Registration Statement”) was filed by Ecolocap Solutions, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the “Company” or the “Registrant”), and the Ecolocap Solutions Inc. 2010 Non-Qualified Stock Option Plan (the “Plan”) relating to 10,000,000 shares of its Common Stock, par value $0.001 per share (the “Common Stock”), to be offered and sold to accounts of eligible persons of the Company under the Plan.

As of December 31, 2011, 10,000,000 shares of common stock have been issued in compensation for services.

Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities

None.

Purchases of Equity Securities by the Company and Affiliated Purchasers

None.

Section 15(g) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

Our company’s shares are covered by Section 15(g) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended that imposes additional sales practice requirements on broker/dealers who sell such securities to persons other than established customers and accredited investors (generally institutions with assets in excess of $5,000,000 or individuals with net worth in excess of $1,000,000 or annual income exceeding $200,000 or $300,000 jointly with their spouses). For transactions covered by the Rule, the broker/dealer must make a special suitability determination for the purchase and have received the purchaser’s written agreement to the transaction prior to the sale. Consequently, the Rule may affect the ability of broker/dealers to sell our securities and also may affect your ability to sell your shares in the secondary market.

Section 15(g) also imposes additional sales practice requirements on broker/dealers who sell penny securities. These rules require a one page summary of certain essential items. The items include the risk of investing in penny stocks in both public offerings and secondary marketing; terms important to in understanding of the function of the penny stock market, such as “bid” and “offer” quotes, a dealers “spread” and broker/dealer compensation; the broker/dealer compensation, the broker/dealers duties to its customers, including the disclosures required by any other penny stock disclosure rules; the customers rights and remedies in causes of fraud in penny stock transactions; and, the NASD’s toll free telephone number and the central number of the North American Administrators Association, for information on the disciplinary history of broker/dealers and their associated persons.

-8-

The application of the penny stock rules may affect your ability to resell your shares.

ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA.

We are a smaller reporting company as defined by Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act and are not required to provide the information under this item.

ITEM 7.

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Operations

The following discussion of the financial condition and results of our operations should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and the related notes thereto included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011 (this “Report”). This Report contains certain forward-looking statements and our future operating results could differ materially from those discussed herein. Certain statements contained in this Report, including, without limitation, statements containing the words “believes”, “anticipates,” “expects” and the like, constitute “forward-looking statements”. Such forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors which may cause our actual results, performance or achievements to be materially different from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Given these uncertainties, readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on such forward-looking statements. We disclaims any obligation to update any such factors or to announce publicly the results of any revisions of the forward-looking statements contained or incorporated by reference herein to reflect future events or developments.

Business Plan

MBT is in the process of locating a site to build its first battery factory in Korea. MBT is also in discussion with various international companies for joint ventures in battery production. MBT will be delivering 60 test batteries to an international communications company and a European bus company.

MBT is negotiating with a factory in Korea that would enable the Company to build 6 NPU and NPW’s machine per month.

Results of Operations

For the Twelve Month Period ended December 31, 2011

Overview

We posted net losses of $8,130,830 for the year ended December 31, 2011 as compared to net losses of $8,917,697 last year. The decrease in loss resulted mainly from impairment loss on Intangible Assets and Goodwill.

Development Stage Expenditures

During the year ended December 31, 2011, we recognized Development Stage Expenditures of $1,861,999, an increase of 21% from the year ended December 31, 2010. The increase is primarily attributable to higher salaries, travel, research & development and professional fees.

Sales

For the year ended December 31, 2011 we had no sales as compared to 469,840 in gross revenues in 2010. Due to the finalizing of the production prototype, quality control and testing done on sight under various environmental conditions.

-9-

Total Cost and Expenses

During the year ended December 31, 2011, we recognized Total Costs and Expenses of $8,130,830, a decrease of 9% from the year ended December 31, 2010. The decrease is attributable to the impairment of the Company’s goodwill and intangible assets as discussed in Note 2.

Selling, General and Administration

During the year ended December 31, 2011, we recognized selling, general and administrative expenses of $881,845 an increase of 17% from the year ended December 31, 2010. The increase resulted from the additional management & salesman salaries, and higher consulting fees.

Interest

We calculate interest in accordance with the respective note payable. For the year ended December 31, 2011, we charged $110,022. This compared to $60,375for last year. The increase is caused by short term loans with high interest.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

At December 31, 2011, we had $2,482 in cash, as opposed to $25,920 in cash at December 31, 2010. Total cash requirements for operations for the twelve month period ended December 31, 2011 was $1,176,048. As a result of its new business plan, management estimates that cash requirements through the end of the fiscal year ended December 31, 2012 will be between $2.0 million to $5.5 million. As of the date of this Report, we do not have available resources sufficient to cover the expected cash requirements through the end of the third quarter of 2012 or the balance of the year. As a result, there is substantial doubt that we can continue as an ongoing business without obtaining additional financing. Management’s plans for maintaining our operations and continued existence include selling additional equity securities and borrowing additional funds to pay operational expenses. There is no assurance we will be able to generate sufficient cash from operations, sell additional shares of Common Stock or borrow additional funds. Our inability to obtain additional cash could have a material adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations and our ability to continue our existence. If our losses continue and we are unable to secure additional financing, we may ultimately be required to seek protection from creditors under applicable bankruptcy laws.

We had total current assets of $182,345 as of December 31, 2011. This was a decrease of $18,445, or 10%, as compared to current assets of $200,920 as of December 31, 2010. The decrease was primarily attributable to a decrease in the Company’s cash.

We had total assets of $575,351 as of December 31, 2011. This was a decrease of 5,943,356, or 96%, as compared to total assets of $6,518,707 as of December 31, 2010. The decrease was primarily attributable to the Company recording a full impairment loss on the intangible assets and goodwill of $5,850,413

We had total current liabilities of $2,446,125 as of December 31, 2011. This was a increase of $21,737, or .1%, as compared to current assets of $2,424,388 as of December 31, 2010. The net increase was attributable to an increase in customer deposits which was off-set by a decrease in Notes payable-stockholders & accrued expenses.

We are party to a lease for our Montreal office (the “Montreal Lease”), at a minimum annual rent of approximately $64,000 per year. The Montreal Lease expires in February 15, 2014. The Company has vacated the premises and according to the lease, a six month rent might have to be paid if the landlord intends a lawsuit against the Company. The six month rent amount has been provisioned in the Financial Statements.

-10-

Our financial condition raises substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern. Management's plan for our continued existence includes selling additional stock through private placements and borrowing additional funds to pay overhead expenses while maintaining marketing efforts to raise our sales volume. Our future success is dependent upon our ability to achieve profitable operations, generate cash from operating activities and obtain additional financing. There is no assurance that we will be able to generate sufficient cash from operations, sell additional shares of common stock or borrow additional funds. Our inability to obtain additional cash could have a material adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations and our ability to continue as a going concern.

This section includes a number of forward-looking statements that reflect our current views with respect to future events and financial performance. Forward-looking statements are often identified by words like: believe, expect, estimate, anticipate, intend, project and similar expressions, or words which, by their nature, refer to future events. You should not place undue certainty on these forward-looking statements, which apply only as of the date of this Memorandum. These forward-looking statements are subject to certain risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from historical results or our predictions.

We have only had operating losses which raise substantial doubts about our viability to continue our business and our auditors have issued an opinion expressing the uncertainty of our company to continue as a going concern. If we are not able to continue operations, investors could lose their entire investment in our company.

Limited Operating History

We have a history of operating losses, and may continue to incur operating losses. We experienced losses during the fiscal year ending December 31, 2011. With respect to the audited year ending December 31, 2011, we incurred losses of $8,130,830(compared with losses of $8,851,600 for the same period last year). We had negative working capital for the year ending December 31, 2011 of $2,263,780 (compared with $2,223,468 for the same period last year), and a stockholders’ deficiency of $6,370,581 as of December 31, 2011 (compared with a stockholders’ deficiency of $1,018,475 as of December 31, 2010). All of these developments raise substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern. As a result of these losses and the losses incurred as of December 31, 2011, our auditors may issue an opinion in their audit report for the year ended December 31, 2011 expressing uncertainty about the ability of our Company to continue as a going concern. This means that there is substantial doubt whether we can continue as an ongoing business without additional financing and/or generating profits from our operations.

Contractual Obligations

The Company is a party to a lease for its Barrington office, at a minimum annual rent of approximately $23,000 per year. The Barrington lease expires in May 2013.

Off Balance Sheet Arrangements

We have no off balance sheet arrangements other than as described above.

We have not entered into any other financial guarantees or other commitments to guarantee the payment obligations of any third parties. We have not entered into any derivative contracts that are indexed to our shares and classified as shareholder’s equity or that are not reflected in our consolidated financial statements. Furthermore, we do not have any retained or contingent interest in assets transferred to an unconsolidated entity that serves as credit, liquidity or market risk support to such entity. We do not have any variable interest in any unconsolidated entity that provides financing, liquidity, market risk or credit support to us or engages in leasing, hedging or research and development services with us.

-11-

ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK.

We are a smaller reporting company as defined by Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act and are not required to provide the information under this item.

ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA.

		Index

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM		F-1

	Consolidated Balance Sheets	F-2
	Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity (Deficiency)	F-3
	Consolidated Statements of Operations	F-4
	Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows	F-5
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements		F-6

-12-

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED ACCOUNTING FIRM

Board of Directors

Ecolocap Solutions, Inc.

(A Development Stage Company)

Barrington, Illinois

We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Ecolocap Solutions, Inc. (a Development Stage Company) (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2011 and 2010 and the related statements of operations, stockholders’ deficiency and cash flows for the two years then ended and from the beginning of the development stage (January 1, 2007) to December 31, 2011. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

As described in Note 3 the Company’s financial statements have been prepared on a going concern basis, which contemplates the realization of assets and settlement of liabilities and commitments in the normal course of business. During the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010, the Company has incurred losses of $ 8,130,830 and $ 8,851,600, respectively. The Company also has a stockholders’ deficiency of $ 6,370,581 and $ 1,018,475 at December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively. These factors, among others, raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Ecolocap Solutions, Inc., (a Development Stage Company) as of December 31, 2011 and 2010 and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010 and the from the beginning of the development stage (January 1, 2007) to December 31, 2011 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

March 31, 2012

	PARITZ & COMPANY PA
	Paritz & Company PA
	Hackensack, New Jersey

F-1

-13-

ECOLOCAP SOLUTIONS INC.

(A Development Stage Company)

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

December 31,

		2011		2010

ASSETS

CURRENT ASSETS
Cash	$	2,482	$	25,920
Deposit on machinery		175,000		175,000
Prepaid expenses and sundry current assets		4,863		-

TOTAL CURRENT ASSETS		182,345		200,920

INTANGIBLE ASSETS ( note 2 and 5 )		-		2,616,485
GOODWILL ( note 2 )		-		3,233,928

PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT, AT COST, LESS ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION		393,006		467,374

TOTAL ASSETS	$	575,351	$	6,518,707

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIENCY

CURRENT LIABILITIES:

Customer deposits		498,772		175,000

Note payable (note 7)		148,977		156,886
Note payable-stockholders (note 8)		706,475		854,180
Accrued expenses and sundry current liabilities (note 6)		1,091,901		1,238,322

TOTAL CURRENT LIABILITIES	$	2,446,125	$	2,424,388

STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIENCY

Common stock 500,000,000 shares authorized, par value $0.001, 199,033,379 and 119,688,015 shares, respectively issued and outstanding	$	199,033	$	176,433
Additional paid in capital		33,937,610		31,794,473
Accumulated Deficit		(25,059,593)		(25,059,593)
Deficit accumulated during development period		(15,447,631)		(7,929,788)

TOTAL STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIENCY	$	(6,370,581)	$	(1,018,475)
Less Non-controlling interest		4,499,807		5,112,794
		(1,870,774)		4,093,319

TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIENCY	$	575,351	$	6,518,707

F-2

-14-

ECOLOCAP SOLUTIONS INC.

(A Development Stage Company)

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS (DEFICIENCY)

Stockholders’ Equity

Stockholders Deficiency	Shares	Common stock Authorized 500,000,000 Shares, Par value 0.001		Additional paid in Capital		Accumulated Deficit		Deficit accumulated during Development Stage		Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)		Subtotal		Non- controlling interest		Total

January 1, 2007	34,578,268	$	97,502	$	13,329,355	$	(25,059,593)	$	-	$	220,463	$	(11,412,273)	$		$	(11,412,273)
Proceeds from the issuance of common stock	990,000		990		1,002,410		-				-		1,003,400				1,003,400
Stock options					1,372,897								1,372,897				1,372,897
Net Income			-		-				6,306,507				6,306,507				6,306,507
Other comprehensive income											(220,463)		(220,463)				(220,463)

December 31, 2007	35,568,268	$	98,492	$	15,704,662	$	(25,059,593)	$	6,306,507	$	-	$	(2,949,932)	$		$	(2,949,932)

Shares issued for settlement of services	4,500,000		4,500		3,834,500								3,839,000				3,839,000
Shares issued following exercise of stock options	25,000		25		225								250				250
Proceeds from the issuance of common stock	250,000		250		74,750		-				-		75,000				75,000
Shares issued for settlement of a debt	3,470,471		3,470		3,133,830								3,137,300				3,137,300
Net Loss			-		-		(4,939,044)						(4,939,044)				(4,939,044)

December 31, 2008	43,813,739	$	106,737	$	22,747,967	$	(25,059,593)	$	1,367,463	$	-	$	(837,426)	$		$	(837,426)

Shares issued following acquisition	54,000,000		54,000		7,118,000								7,172,000				7,172,000
Shares issued for services	1,650,000		1,650		266,350								268,000				268,000
Non-controlling interest pursuant to acquisition (see Note 2)															5,643,000		5,643,000
Proceeds from the issuance of common stock	460,923		461		139,539												140,000
Net Loss			-		-				(907,051)				(907,051)		(68,806)		(975,857)

December 31, 2009	99,924,662	$	162,848	$	30,271,856	$	(25,059,593)	$	460,412	$	-	$	5,835,523	$	5,574,194	$	11,409,717

Shares issued for services	825,000		825		91,675												92,500
Shares issued for settlement of a debt	15,399,276		8,398		1,211,188								92,500				1,219,586
Proceeds from the issuance of common stock	4,362,154		4,362		213,638												218,000
Imputed interest on non-interest bearing stockholders loans							6,116						218,000				6,116
Net Loss									(8,390,200)						(461,400)		(8,851,600)

December 31, 2010	120,511,092	$	120,511	$	31,850,395	$	(25,059,593)	$	(7,929,788)	$	-	$	(1,018,475)	$	5,112,794	$	4,094,319

Shares issued for services	9,456,414		9,457		204,622												214,079
Shares issued for settlement of a debt	67,407,978		67,407		1,799,245								214,079				1,866,652
Proceeds from the issuance of common stock	1,657,895		1,658		66,500								68,158				68,158
Imputed interest on non-interest bearing stockholders loans							16,848						16,848				16,848
Net Loss													(7,517,843)		(612,987)		(8,130,830)

December 31, 2011	199,033,379	$	199,033	$	33,937,610	$	(25,059,593)	$	(15,447,631)	$	-	$	(6,370,581)	$	4,499,807	$	(1,870,774)

F-3

-15-

ECOLOCAP SOLUTIONS INC.

(A Development Stage Company)

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

						Beginning of
						development stage,
						January 1, 2007,
		December 31,		December 31,		through
		2011		2010		December 2011

SALES	$	-	$	469,840	$	469,840

Cost of sales		-		452,000		452,000

Gross Profit		-		17,840		17,840

COSTS AND EXPENSES:		-		-		-

Selling, general and administrative		881,845		731,443		3,175,345
Depreciation and amortization ( note 4 and 5 )		268,358		404,273		847,506
Research and Development		582,355		477,923		1,060,278
Gain on settlement debts-foreign Subsidiary		-				(8,013,125)

Impairment Loss Intangible Assets		2,422,495		3,077,347		5,499,842
Impairment Loss Goodwill		3,233,928		3,774,793		7,008,721
Compensation expense ( Note 9)		78,999		121,407		200,406
Stock Based compensation		-		-		5,211,897
Debt conversion inducement expense ( Note 9)		550,369		269,928		820,297
Compensation for services		-		-		258,000
Interest		110,022		60,375		565,721
Foreign exchange loss (gain)		2,459		208		(163,418)

TOTAL COSTS AND EXPENSES		8,130,830		8,917,697		16,471,470

Net loss from continuing operations	$	(8,130,830 )	$	(8,899,857)	$	(16,453,630)
Net loss from discontinued operations	$	-	$	-		(185,451)

Gain on Sale of discontinued operations ( note 12)		-		48,257		48,257

Net loss		(8,130,830 )		(8,851,600)		(16,590,824)

Attributable to:

Ecolocap Solutions Inc.	$	(7,517,843)	$	(8,390,200)	$	(15,447,631)
Non-controlling interest	$	(612,987)	$	(461,400)	$	(1,143,193)

Loss Per Share
Continuing operations	$	(0.05)		(0.08)		N/A
	$	(0.05)	$	(0.08)	$	N/A
Average weighted Number of Shares Outstanding		162,171,694		107,174,035		N/A

F-4

-16-

ECOLOCAP SOLUTIONS INC.

(A Development Stage Company)

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

						Beginning of
						development stage,
						January 1, 2007,
		December 31,		December 31,		through
		2011		2010		December 2011

Net loss	$	(7,517,843)	$	(8,390,200)	$	(15,447,631)
Adjustment to reconcile net loss to net cash used in
operating activities
Depreciation and amortization		268,358		404,273		847,507
Imputed interests of shareholders loans		16,848		6,116		22,964
Impairment Loss Intangible Assets		2,422,495		3,077,347		5,499,842
Impairment Loss Goodwill		3,233,928		3,774,793		7,008,721
Compensation expense ( Note 9)		78,999		121,407		200,406
Debt conversion inducement expense ( Note 9)		550,369		269,928		820,297
Issuance of common stock for services		-		-		3,269,600
Stock based compensation		-		-		5,211,897
Unrealized foreign exchange						(220,463)
Non cash adjustment
Non-controlling interest		(612,987)		(461,400)		(1,143,193)
Changes in operating assets and liabilities
Taxes receivable		-		730		-
Prepaid expenses and sundry current assets		(4,863)		14,578		36,482
Deposit on machinery		-		434,823		370,400
Customer deposit		323,772		(279,940)		43,832
Accrued expenses and sundry current liabilities		64,876		944,136		(1,961,175)

Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities	$	(1,176,048)	$	(83,409)	$	4,559,486

Investing activities
Disposition of property and equipment		-		-		29,352
Cash acquired during acquisition		-		-		38,115
Acquisitions of property and equipment		-		(496,000)		(520,355)

Net cash used in investing activities	$	-	$	(496,000)	$	(452,888)

Financing activities

Stock payable		-		-		(1,000,000)
Issuance of common stock		60,000		195,760		471,010
Sale of common stock						1,003,400
Proceeds of loans payable		42,091		109,500		151,590
Proceeds of loans payable shareholder		1,050,519		298,125		(4,858,723)

Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities	$	1,152,610	$	603,385	$	(4,232,723)

Increase (decrease) in cash		(23,438)		23,976		(126,125)

Cash- beginning of period		25,920		1,944		128,607

Cash - end of period	$	2,482	$	25,920	$	2,482

Supplemental Disclosure of Cash Flow information
Non cash items:
Conversion of debt to Equity		550,369		269,928		820,297

F-5

-17-

ECOLOCAP SOLUTIONS INC.

(A Development Stage Company)

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 1 – NATURE OF BUSINESS

EcoloCap Solutions Inc. is an integrated and complementary network of environmentally focused technology companies that utilize advanced nanotechnology to design, develop and sell cleaner alternative energy products. We bring together the technology, engineering, and operational management for the successful development of environmentally significant products and projects. Our business approach combines science, innovation, and market-ready solutions to achieve environmentally sustainable and economically advantageous, power and energy management practices in the following areas:

MBT M-Fuel

EcoloCap Solutions Inc., through its subsidiary Micro Bubble Technologies Inc. (MBT), developed M-Fuel, an innovative suspension fuel that far exceeds all conventional fuels’ costs and efficiencies. This environmentally-friendly and economical product is designed to offer fully scalable and customizable fuel solutions that will increase efficiency, lower operating costs, and reduce emissions. M -Fuel is a suspension mixture of 60% heavy oil, 40% H plus O2 molecules, and a 0.3% stabilizing additive. The production of M-Fuel takes place in our Nano Processing Units (NPU), a self contained device that is sized for output. The NPU’s can be configured to operate in conjunction with an engine or burner to sully M-Fuel on demand, or pre-manufactured for delivery. M-Fuels unique burning process facilitates increased efficiency, resulting in reduced emissions by 60%, reduced fuel consumption by 40%, and cut costs by up to 25%.

MBT -Batteries

EcoloCap Solutions Inc., through its subsidiary Micro Bubble Technologies Inc. (MBT), developed the Carbon Nano Tube Battery (CNT-Battery), a fully recyclable, rechargeable battery that far exceeds the performance capabilities of any existing battery on the market at this time. This environmentally-friendly and economical product is designed to offer fully scalable and customizable power solutions that will increase efficiency, lower operating costs, and reduce emissions. Our proprietary technology modifies the fabrication of lead acid batteries by applying a highly-conductive carbon nano tube coating to the anode and cathode cells. As a result, conductive surface area is increased by a factor of billions and electricity is carried out more efficiently. The CNT-Battery’s advanced technology demonstrates eight times the reserve capacity of traditional lead acid batteries, two and a half times the energy density of lithium-ion batteries, and a recharge time of just five minutes; all at a fraction of the cost of lithium-ion batteries.

DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY

The Company was an active business from 2005 through 2006 and was involved in the artificial sport surface. From 2007 through September 2010, the Company was looking for new business and commenced the Carbon Credits (CER’S) business. In the 2009, the Company acquired a participation in Micro Bubble Technologies Inc. and became an integrated and complementary network of environmentally focused technology company. The Company currently has operations but limited revenues and, in accordance with the relevant authoritive guidance is considered a Development Stage Enterprise. As a development stage enterprise, the Company discloses the deficit accumulated during the development stage and the cumulative statements of operations and cash flows from January 1, 2007 to the current balance sheet date.

F-6

-18-

NOTE 2 – SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

PRINCIPLES OF CONSOLIDATION

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its subsidiary Micro Bubble Technologies Inc. (see Note 12) after the elimination of inter-company accounts and transactions.

CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS

The Company considers all highly liquid debt instruments with original maturities not exceeding three months to be cash equivalents.

The Company maintains cash balances at various financial institutions. Accounts at each institution are insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation up to $250,000. The Company’s accounts at these institutions may, at times, exceed the federally insured limits. The Company has not experienced any losses in such accounts.

FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

The Company adopted the provisions of ASC Topic 820, “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures”, which defines fair value as used in numerous accounting pronouncements, establishes a framework for measuring fair value and expands disclosure of fair value measurements.

The estimated fair value of certain financial instruments, including cash and cash equivalents, deposits, prepaid expenses, notes payable, and accrued expenses are carried at historical cost basis, which approximates their fair values because of the short-term nature of these instruments.

MC 820 defines fair value as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. ASC 820 also establishes a fair value hierarchy, which requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. MC 820 describes three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value:

-	level l - quoted prices in active markets for Identical assets or liabilities
-	level 2 - quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets or inputs that are observable
-	level 3 - inputs that are unobservable (for example cash flow modeling inputs based on assumptions)

INCOME TAXES

The asset and liability approach is used to account for income taxes by recognizing deferred tax assets and liabilities for the expected future tax consequences of temporary differences between the carrying amounts and the tax bases of assets and liabilities. The Company records a valuation allowance to reduce the deferred tax assets to the amount that is more likely than not to be realized.

USE OF ESTIMATES

In preparing financial statements, management makes estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities in the balance sheet and revenue and expenses in the income statement. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

REVENUE RECOGNITION

The Company sells machinery used to prepare M-fuel. The machinery is manufactured for the Company by a third-party in Korea. Revenue is recognized at the time of shipment and when title changes hands to the buyer.

F-7

-19-

LOSS PER COMMON SHARE

The basic net loss per common share is computed by dividing the net loss by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding.

Diluted net loss per common share is computed by dividing the net loss, adjusted on an “as if converted” basis, by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding plus potential dilutive securities.

STOCK BASED COMPENSATION

The Company accounts for stock options and similar equity instruments issued in accordance with SFAS No. 123(revised), “Share-Based Payment”. Accordingly, compensation costs attributable to stock options or similar equity instruments granted are measured at the fair value at the grant date, and expensed over the expected vesting period. Transactions in which goods or services are received in exchange for the issuance of equity instruments are accounted for based on the fair value of the consideration received or the fair value of the equity instruments issued, whichever is more reliably measurable.

GOODWILL, OTHER INTANGIBLES AND LONG-LIVED ASSETS

The Company records as goodwill the excess of purchase price over the fair value of the tangible and identifiable intangible assets acquired. Current authoritative guidance requires that goodwill not being amortized, but to be tested for impairment annually as well as when an event or change in circumstance indicates an impairment may have occurred. Goodwill is tested for impairment by comparing the fair value of the Company’s individual reporting units to their carrying amount to determine if there is potential goodwill impairment. If the fair value of the reporting unit is less than its carrying value, an impairment loss is recorded to the extent that the implied fair value of the goodwill of the reporting unit is less than its carrying value.

Long-lived assets, including fixed assets and intangible assets, are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable. In reviewing for impairment, the carrying value of such assets is compared to the estimated undiscounted future cash flows expected from the use of the assets and their eventual disposition. If such cash flows are not sufficient to support the asset’s recorded value, an impairment charge is recognized to reduce the carrying value of the long-lived asset to its estimated fair value. The determination of future cash flows, as well as the estimated fair value of long-lived assets, involves significant estimates on the part of management. In order to estimate the fair value of a long-lived asset, the Company may engage a third-party to assist with the valuation. If there is a material change in economic conditions or other circumstances influencing the estimate of future cash flows or fair value, the Company could be required to recognize impairment charges in the future.

Impairment:

At each reporting date, the Company assesses whether there is any indication that its intangible assets, or property, plant and equipment are impaired. If any such indication exists, the Group estimates the recoverable amount of the asset and the impairment loss if any. Goodwill is tested for impairment annually or more frequently if events or changes in circumstances indicate that it might be impaired. If an asset does not generate cash flows that are independent from those of other assets or groups of assets, recoverable amount is determined for the cash-generating unit to which the asset belongs. The recoverable amount of an asset is the higher of its fair value less cost to sell and its value in use. Value in use is the present value of future cash flows from the asset or cash-generating unit discounted at a rate that reflects market interest rates adjusted for risks specific to the asset or cash- generating unit that have not been reflected in the estimation of future cash flows. If the recoverable amount of an intangible or tangible asset is less than its carrying value, an impairment loss is recognised immediately in profit or loss and the carrying value of the asset reduced by the amount of the loss. A reversal of an impairment loss on intangible assets (excluding goodwill) or property, plant and equipment is recognised as it arises provided the

F-8

-20-

increased carrying value does not exceed that which it would have been had no impairment loss been recognised. Impairment losses on goodwill are not reversed. During the year ended December 31, 2010, we incurred an intangible assets impairment loss of $3,077,793. This impairment loss relates to our acquisition for MICRO BUBBLE TECHNOLOGIES INC. as our management has adjusted downward our Customer Relationship agreements because the two agreements have been terminated over the past year. We incurred a goodwill impairment loss of $3,774,793. This impairment loss relates to our acquisition for MICRO BUBBLE TECHNOLOGIES INC. is in direct proportion of the adjustment of our Customer Relationship agreements.

During the year ended December 31, 2011, we recorded an intangible assets impairment loss of $5,656,423. This impairment loss relates to our acquisition for MICRO BUBBLE TECHNOLOGIES INC. as our management has adjusted downward our Batteries and M-Fuel technologies because the two technologies have not been generated the forecasted income over the past year.

PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT AND DEPRECIATION POLICY

Property and equipment are recorded at cost. Depreciation is provided for in amounts sufficient to amortize the costs of the related assets over their estimated useful lives on the straight-line and accelerated methods for both financial reporting and income tax purposes.

Maintenance, repairs and minor renewals are charged to expense when incurred. Replacements and major renewals are capitalized.

RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT

Research and development costs are charged to expense as incurred.

ACQUISITION OF MICRO BUBBLE TECHNOLOGIES INC.

On September 10, 2009, the Company completed the acquisition of 55% of MBT, engaged in the business of manufacturing, marketing, distributing, setting up sub-distributors, and selling products based on nano technologies, for a purchase price of $7,172,000 in common shares of the Company. This acquisition was funded from common stock.

The acquisition was accounted for using the purchase method of accounting in accordance with the relevant authoritive guidance. The purchase price has been assigned to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on their estimated fair values. The intangible assets are being amortized over periods ranging from ten to fifteen years. The weighted average amortization period in total is 15.0 years. The weighted average amortization period by major asset class is: customer relationship 10.0 years; technology batteries 15.0 years and technology M-Fuel 15.0 years. In connection with the acquisition, the Company recorded $7,425,000 of goodwill. The Company’s financial statements include the results of operations of Micro Bubble subsequent to the acquisition date.

MBT developed and manufactures M-Fuel, an innovative suspension fuel that far exceeds all conventional fuels’ costs and efficiencies. It also developed and manufactures the Carbon Nano Tube Battery (CNT-Battery), a fully recyclable, rechargeable battery that far exceeds the performance capabilities of any existing battery on the market at this time. The acquisition of this business will enable the Company to expand its reference in an integrated and complementary network of environmentally focused technology companies that utilize advanced nanotechnology to design, develop, manufacture and sell cleaner alternative energy products.

The acquisition was accounted for as follows (in thousands):

F-9

-21-

Assets:
Cash		38
Technology Batteries		2,790
Technology EM Fuel		80
Customer Relationships		3,350
Goodwill		7,009

	$	12,915

Liabilities:
Accrued Liabilities		452
Minority interest	$	5,643


Total Purchase Price	$	7,172

Business Combinations

In 2008, prior to the acquisition of MBT, MBT had no income or expenses incurred and accordingly no pro-forma information are presented.

NOTE 3 – GOING CONCERN

The Company’s consolidated financial statements have been prepared on a going concern basis, which contemplates the realization of assets and settlement of liabilities and commitments in the normal course of business. The Company posted net loss of $8,130,830 for the year ended December 31, 2011.The Company has negative working capital of $2,263,780 at December 31, 2011 and a stockholders’ deficiency of $6,370,581 at December 31, 2011. These factors among others raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.

Management’s plans for the Company’s continued existence include selling additional stock and borrowing additional funds to pay overhead expenses.

With the opportunities created by the Batteries and M Fuel, management has begun the process of redeploying its assets, identifying business strategies that offers above average profit potential and identifying the resources necessary to successfully execute it new strategic direction.

Recognizing the opportunity this new market represents, the Company has developed an integrated development approach that focuses upon both existing and needed infrastructure facilities to produce substantial new value.

The Company’s future success is dependent upon its ability to achieve profitable operations, generate cash from operating activities and obtain additional financing. There is no assurance that the Company will be able to generate sufficient cash from operations, sell additional shares of common stock or borrow additional funds.

The Company’s inability to obtain additional cash could have a material adverse effect on its financial position, results of operations and its ability to continue in existence. The consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

F-10

-22-

NOTE 4 – PROPERTY & OFFICE EQUIPMENT

Equipment is stated at cost. Depreciation is computed using the straight-line method over the estimated useful life of the assets ranging from 3 to 7 years.

		December 31		December 31,
		2011		2010

Testing equipment	$	496,000	$	496,000
Computer equipment		11,654		11,654
Furniture & fixtures		12,701		12,701
	$	520,355	$	520,355

Less: accumulated depreciation		127,349	$	52,981

Balance December 31, 2011	$	393,006	$	467,374

NOTE 5 – INTANGIBLE ASSETS

The intangible assets are being amortized over periods ranging from ten to fifteen years. The weighted average amortization period by major asset class is: customer relationship 10.0 years; technology batteries 15.0 years and technology M-Fuel 15.0 years.

		December 31		December 31,
		2011		2010

Technology Batteries	$	-	$	2,070,000
Technology EM Fuel		-		800,000
Customer Relationships		-		-
	$	-	$	2,870,000

Less: accumulated amortization		-	$	253,515

Balance December 31, 2011	$	-	$	2,616,485

NOTE 6 – ACCRUED EXPENSES AND SUNDRY CURRENT LIABILITIES

Accrued expenses consisted of the following at December 31:

		2011		2010
Accrued interest	$	19,746	$	42,177
Accrued operating expenses		1,072,155		1,196,145
	$	1,091,901	$	1,238,322

NOTE 7 – NOTE PAYABLE

In 2011, the Company received loans from Capex Investments Limited in the amount of $82,091. In 2010, the Company received loans from Capex Investments Limited in the amount of $19,500. The amount owed to Capex Investments Limited at December 31 is $148,977. These loans carry an interest of 10% and are payable on demand.

F-11

-23-

NOTE 8 – PAYABLE – STOCKHOLDERS

On January 1, 2011, DT Crystal converted loans of $360,000 plus $25,000 in accrued interest into 13,508,772 shares of the Company. The fair value of the shares was $0.0285 per share and the market price was $ 0.0374 per share resulting in a debt conversion inducement expense of $120,292. The amount owed to DT Crystal at December 31, 2011 is $2,404.

During 2011, Asher Enterprises Inc converted loans aggregating $189,500 into 12,604,518 common shares of the Company. The fair value of the shares ranged from $.0075 to .031 per share and the market price ranged from 0.01 to 0.07 per share which resulted in a debt conversion inducement expense of $124,435.

In 2011, the Company received loans from Asher Enterprises Inc. in the amount of $237,500. The amount owed to Asher Enterprises Inc. at December 31, 2011, after conversions is $143,000. The loans are convertible, over a one year period, into restricted common shares at a fixed price. The price of the shares is equal to 61% of the market price of the shares at the date of the execution of the conversion. This loan bears interest at 8% per annum and is payable on demand. The Company believes that the effect of this beneficial conversion is immaterial to the Company financial statements.

In 2011, the Company received an additional $40,000 loan from a stockholder. In 2010, the Company received loans from a stockholder of $144,224. In 2009, the Company received loans from a stockholder in the amount of $57,000. The loans are convertible, over a one year period, into restricted common shares of the Company at a fixed price of $0.024 per share.

On October 13, 2011 a stockholder converted loans of $241,224 into 14,000,000 shares of the Company. The fair value of the shares was equal to $0.019 per share and the market price was $0.0195 per resulting in a debt conversion inducement expense of $6,665. The amount owed to a stockholder at December 31, 2011 is $0.

In 2011, the Company received $245,769 in loans from stockholders. The amount owed to stockholders at December 31, 2011 is $457,971. These loans bear interest at 5.00% per annum and are payable on demand.

In 2011, the Company received net loans from Hanscom K. Inc. in the amount of $36,250. The amount owed to Hanscom K. Inc. at December 31, 2011 is $39,600. These loans are non-interest bearing and are payable on demand.

During 2011, Barclay Lyons converted loans aggregating $50,000 plus accrued interest of $5,724 into 2,800,112 common shares. The fair value of the shares ranged from $0.016575 to $0.025 per share and the market price ranged from $0.0262 to $0.0386 per share resulting in a total debt conversion inducement expense of $31,345. The amount owed to Barclay Lyons at December 31, 2011 is $0.

During 2011, War Chest Capital converted loans aggregating $50,000 plus accrued interest of $5,724 into 2,800,112 common shares. The fair value of the shares ranged from $.016575 to .025 per share and the market price ranged from 0.0262 to 0.0386 per share resulting in a total debt conversion inducement expense of $31,345. The amount owed to War Chest Capital at December 31, 2011 is $0.

On March 22, 2011, Lionhearth and a debtor signed an agreement whereby the debtor transferred $107,500 of its loans to Lionhearth. On March 22, 2011 Lionhearth converted loans of $58,709 into 3,600,000 shares. The fair value of the shares was equal $0.016308 per common share and the market price was equal was 0.0419 per share which results in a debt conversion inducement expense of $92,131. The amount owed to Lionhearth at December 31, 2011 is $0.

On April 6, 2011 Lionhearth converted loans of $48,791 into 3,148,226 shares of the Company. The fair value of the shares was equal to $0.015498 per share and the market price was $0.0376 per resulting in a debt conversion inducement expense of $69,582. The amount owed to Lionhearth at December 31, 2011 is $0.

F-12

-24-

On April 18, 2011, RCO Group Inc. and a debtor signed an agreement whereby the debtor transferred $268,500 of its loans to RCO Group Inc.

During 2011, RCO Group Inc. converted loans aggregating $240,000 into 13,333,335 shares. The fair value of the shares ranged from $0.018 to $0.023 per share and the market price ranged from $0.023 to $.024 per share resulting in a total debt conversion inducement expense of $73,445.

On May 23, 2011, Black Mountain Equities, Inc. purchased for $35,000 a convertible debenture of the Company in the aggregate principal amount of $50,000.

On December 22, 2011 Black Mountain Equities, Inc. converted debenture of $15,000 into 1,612,903 shares of the Company. The fair value of the shares was equal to $0.0093 per share and the market price was $0.01 per resulting in a debt conversion inducement expense of $1,129. The amount of the Black Mountain Equities, Inc. convertible debenture, Inc. at December 31, 2011 is $35,000.

Debt conversion inducement expense consist of:
Asher Enterprises	$	124,435
Stockholder		6,665
DT Crystal		120,292
Barclay Lyons		31,345
War Chest Capital		31,345
Lionhearth		161,713
Black Mountain Equities, Inc.		1,129
RCO Group Inc.		73,445
Total	$	550,369

NOTE 9 – CAPITAL STOCK

The Company is authorized to issue 500,000,000 shares of common stock (par value $0.001) of which 199,033,379 were issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2011.

On January 20, 2011, we issued 666,667 shares to Michel St-Pierre, our chief financial officer, in exchange for certain fees payable to him. The fair value of the shares was $0.0289 per share resulting in additional recorded compensation expense of $4,267.

On February 9, 2011, we issued 533,333 shares of to Claude Pellerin, our secretary, in exchange for fees payable to him. The fair value of the shares was $0.0289 per share resulting in additional recorded compensation expense of $3,413.

January 5, 2011, Bui Thi Lan Huong paid $50,000 to purchase 1,000,000 common shares. The fair value of the shares was $0.05 per share and the market price was equal to 0.055 per share resulting in additional recorded compensation expense of $5,000.

On April 18, 2011, we issued 1,000,000 shares to Michel St-Pierre, our chief financial officer, in exchange for fees payable to him. The fair value of the shares was $0.0275 per share resulting in additional recorded compensation expense of $15,500.

On April 18, 2011, we issued 1,036,000 shares to Claude Pellerin, our secretary, in exchange for fees payable to him. The fair value of the shares was $0.0275 per share resulting in additional recorded compensation expense of $16,059.

F-13

-25-

On October 13, 2011, we issued 872,655 shares to Michel St-Pierre, our chief financial officer, in exchange for certain fees payable to him. The fair value of the shares was $0.02 per share resulting in additional recorded compensation expense of $4,363.

On October 13, 2011, we issued 128,784 shares of to Claude Pellerin, our secretary, in exchange for fees payable to him. The fair value of the shares was $0.02 per share resulting in additional recorded compensation expense of $644.

On November 15, 2011, we issued 4,460,678 shares to Michel St-Pierre, our chief financial officer, in exchange for certain fees payable to him. The fair value of the shares was $0.02 per share resulting in additional recorded compensation expense of $22,304.

On November 15, 2011, we issued 658,296 shares of to Claude Pellerin, our secretary, in exchange for fees payable to him. The fair value of the shares was $0.02 per share resulting in additional recorded compensation expense of $3,292.

On November 15, 2011, Tu Cong Phuong Pham paid $10,000 to purchase 657,895 common shares. The fair value of the shares was $0.02 per share and the market price was equal to 0.0152 per share resulting in additional recorded compensation expense of $3,158.

On December 6, 2011, we issued 50,000 shares to Jerry McCalla, in exchange for certain fees payable to him. The fair value of the shares was $0.01 per share resulting in additional recorded compensation expense of $500.

On December 6, 2011, we issued 50,000 shares to Ryan McCalla, in exchange for certain fees payable to him. The fair value of the shares was $0.01 per share resulting in additional recorded compensation expense of $500.

	Compensation expense
Bui Thi Lan Huong	5,000
Tu Cong Phuong Pham	3,158
Michel St-Pierre	46,434
Claude Pellerin	23,407
Jerry McCalla	500
Ryan McCalla	500
Total	78,999

NOTE 10 – INCOME TAXES

As of December 31, 2011 the company had net operating loss carry forwards of approximately $13,772,456 of which $5,711,364 were generated through foreign transactions and were already taken into account in the tax filing of the Foreign Subsidiary and are not available for US tax purpose. The remaining net operating losses are being carried forward for subsequent years. This results in no tax expense or provision for the year.

Components of deferred tax assets and liabilities at December 31, 2011 and 2010 are as follows:

		2011		2010
Deferred tax asset	$	8,061,093	$	5,505,152
Valuation allowance		(8,061,093)		(5,505,152)
Net deferred tax asset	$	0	$	0

The Company has recorded a full valuation allowance against its deferred tax asset since it believes it is more likely than not that such deferred tax asset will not be realized.

F-14

-26-

NOTE 11 – DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS

On November 4, 2010, the Company transferred all of its shares of Ecolocap Solutions (Canada) Inc. to DT Crystal Holdings Ltd in exchange of the reduction of $100,000 of its debts.

NOTE 12 – COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

The Company is a party to a lease for its Montreal office, at a minimum annual rental of approximately $64,000 per year. The Company has vacated the premises and according to the lease, a six month rent might have to be paid if the landlord intends a lawsuit against the Company. The six month rent amount has been accrued in the accompanying Financial Statements. The rent expense charged to operations for the year ended December 31, 2011 and 2010 was $22,792 and $23,400, respectively.

The Company is a party to a lease for its Barrington office, at a minimum annual rent of approximately $23,000 per year. The Barrington Lease expires in May, 2013.

NOTE 13 – RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

In 2011, the Company received loans from a stockholder in the amount of $40,000. These loans carry an interest of 1.63% and are payable on demand.

In 2011, the Company received loans from stockholders in the amount of $245,769. These loans carry an interest of 5.00% and are payable on demand.

In 2011, the Company received loans from Hanscom K. Inc. in the amount of $36,250. These loans have no interest and are payable on demand.

NOTE 14 – SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

Management evaluated all activity of the Company through March 30, 2012 (the issue date of the Consolidated Financial Statements) and noted there were no material subsequent events as of that date.

F-15

-27-

ITEM 9.

CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE.

There have been no disagreements on accounting and financial disclosures from the inception of our company through the date of this Form 10-K. Our financial statements for the period from inception to December 31, 2011, included in this report have been audited by Paritz & Company, PA, as set forth in this annual report.

ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES.

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

We maintain “disclosure controls and procedures,” as such term is defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”), that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our Exchange Act reports is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. We conducted an evaluation (the “Evaluation”), under the supervision and with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) and Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”), of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures (“Disclosure Controls”) as of the end of the period covered by this report pursuant to Rule 13a-15 of the Exchange Act. Based on this Evaluation, our CEO and CFO concluded that our Disclosure Controls were effective as of the end of the period covered by this report.

Limitations on the Effectiveness of Controls

Our management, including our CEO and CFO, does not expect that our Disclosure Controls and internal controls will prevent all errors and all fraud. A control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. Further, the design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within the Company have been detected. These inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty, and that breakdowns can occur because of a simple error or mistake. Additionally, controls can be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more people, or by management or board override of the control.

The design of any system of controls also is based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions; over time, controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. Because of the inherent limitations in a cost-effective control system, misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and not be detected.

CEO and CFO Certifications

Appearing immediately following the Signatures section of this report there are Certifications of the CEO and the CFO. The Certifications are required in accordance with Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (the Section 302 Certifications). This Item of this report, which you are currently reading is the information concerning the Evaluation referred to in the Section 302 Certifications and this information should be read in conjunction with the Section 302 Certifications for a more complete understanding of the topics presented.

-28-

Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(f). The Company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance to our management and board of directors regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of the financial statements for external purposes in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

Our internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the Company; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, and that receipts and expenditures of the Company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the Company; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the Company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal controls over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. All internal control systems, no matter how well designed, have inherent limitations, including the possibility of human error and the circumvention of overriding controls. Accordingly, even effective internal control over financial reporting can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

Our management assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2011. In making this assessment, it used the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) in Internal Control-Integrated Framework. Based on our assessment, we believe that, as of December 31, 2011, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting was effective based on those criteria.

This annual report does not include an attestation report of our registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting. Management’s report was not subject to attestation by our registered public accounting firm pursuant to temporary rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission that permit us to provide only management’s report in this annual report.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting during the quarter ended December 31, 2011 that have affected, or are reasonably likely to affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION.

None.

PART III

ITEM 10.

DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE.

The following table presents information with respect to our officers, directors and significant employees as of the date of this Report:

-29-

Name	Age	Position
Michael Siegel	68	Chief Executive Officer
Jeung Kwak	65	Chairman, Director
Robert Egger, Jr.	40	Chief Operating Officer
Tri Vu Truong	64	Director
Claude Pellerin	42	Director
Mark Lawson	39	Director
Albert Beerli	69	Director
Michel St-Pierre	49	Acting Chief Financial Officer

Each director serves until our next annual meeting of the stockholders or unless they resign earlier. The Board of Directors elects officers and their terms of office are at the discretion of the Board of Directors.

Each of our directors serves until his or her successor is elected and qualified. Each of our officers is elected by the board of directors to a term of one (1) year and serves until his or her successor is duly elected and qualified, or until he or she is removed from office. At the present time, members of the board of directors are not compensated for their services to the board.

Biographical Information Regarding Officers and Directors

Michael Siegel, Chief Executive Officer and President Studied Electrical Engineering at the University of Illinois in Champaign, Illinois, and following college joined the Marine Corps. He has over 30 years of experience in the technology, real estate and international business operations. On September 10, 2009, Michael Siegel was appointed president and principal executive officer. Mr. Siegel is currently a member of the board of directors.Since May 2008, Mr. Siegel has been president of Micro Bubble Technologies Inc., a Nevada corporation located in Barrington, Illinois. Micro Bubble Technologies Inc. is engaged in the business of manufacturing, marketing, distributing, setting up sub-distributors, and selling products based on nano technologies. He served as President and CEO of International Lottery and Gaming Inc. and Vietnam Telephone Co (Vietelco). From June 1975 to May 2008, Mr. Siegel was president of Siegel Research and Development, Inc., which created gaming, video and other technologies. He was also a general partner in 5 Hotels in the Chicago area. Between 2006 and 2008 Mr. Siegel was president of C Line, Inc.

Robert Egger Jr., Chief Operating Officer. On September 10, 2009, Robert Egger, Jr. was appointed to our board of directors and principal operating officer since July 2008, Mr. Egger has been chief executive officer of Micro Bubble Technologies Inc., our subsidiary corporation, located in Barrington, Illinois. Micro Bubble Technologies Inc. is engaged in the business of manufacturing, marketing, distributing, setting up sub-distributors, and selling products based on nano technologies. From January 2007 to March 2009, Mr. Egger was partner and general manager of the Liquor Outlet located in Davenport, Iowa. The Liquor Outlet is a wholesale liquor distributor in the State of Iowa. From March 1995 to January 2007, Mr. Egger held various positions with Qwest Communications International located in Denver, Colorado. His responsibilities included lineman, switchman and central office technician before being promoted to management in 2000 when he became a manager for network operations in Iowa overseeing occupational union employees. Mr. Egger holds a Bachelor of Science degree in Business Administration, Magna Cum Laude, from St. Ambrose University, Davenport, Iowa.

Jeung Kwak, Chairman and Director. Since June 16, 2009, Mr. Kwak has been Chairman of Ecolocap Solutions Inc., Jeung Yeal Kwak has for over 25 years specialized in international trade in Korea, Asia, Russia, India, China and the US. Since 1992, he is President of Hanscom K Inc, specialized in international trade in steel products, including steel castings and fabrications and also concrete forms. In May 2008, he co-founded Micro Bubble Technologies Inc., a Nevada corporation located in Barrington, Illinois. Micro Bubble Technologies Inc. is engaged in the business of manufacturing, marketing, distributing, setting up sub-distributors, and selling products based on nano technologies. He attended Korea University and graduated in 1973 with a degree in Biology. Upon graduation, he immigrated to the United States and began his career in Chicago, Illinois.

-30-

Dr. Tri Vu Truong, Chief Executive Officer and President. Dr. Truong has served as a director since February 14, 2008. He was chief executive officer and president of the Company from February 14, 2008 until September 10, 2009. He has worked in the environmental sector since 1970, upon completion of his B. Engineering degree, complemented by a Master’s degree in Chemical Engineering in 1971 and a Ph.D. degree in Civil Engineering with Environmental Option in 1975. His professional career includes the realization of many major scientific and technical studies and projects. Dr. Truong was responsible in 1977 for the creation and operation of the Permits & Inspections Division of the Montreal Urban Community––Environment Department. He has taught several post-graduate courses at the prestigious Universitéé de Montrééal’s ÉÉcole Polytechnique. As President of the Sodexen Environmental Engineering Group since 1981, Dr. Truong has managed numerous major environmental impact projects, including: Comparative study of the environmental impact of dust-palliatives (MTQ 1988, 1989, 1990); Environmental decommissioning of a polystyrene production complex (BASF, 1988-1990); Solid waste management study relating to the closure of the Miron landfill (Montrééal, 1988-90), as well as various research & development projects in the area.

Claude Pellerin, Director. Mr. Pellerin has been reappointed to the Board on March 6, 2009 and is a member. Mr. Pellerin is a corporate attorney and was a partner in the law firm of Kaufman Laramee LLP between July 2008 and July 2009. Between December 2003 and July 2008 Mr. Pellerin was partner in the law firm of Hovington Pellerin S.e.n.c. Since 2002, Mr. Pellerin has served as Director, President, Treasurer and Secretary of Capex Investments ( Canada ) Limited, an investments and financing corporation based in Montreal, Quebec . From 2001-2002, Mr. Pellerin served as a Secretary for Equilar Capital Corporation, an Ontario Corporation listed on the Toronto Stock exchange. Between 2002 and 2004, Mr. Pellerin served as Vice President for legal affairs for Manaris Corporation, a Nevada corporation listed on the OTCBB. Since 2003, Mr. Pellerin has served as Secretary of Gourmet Flash Inc., a Quebec corporation, and from 2004-2005 served as a Director to Canadian Security Agency (2004) Inc. Mr. Pellerin served as the Company’s President, Secretary and Treasurer from June 17, 2005 until August 19, 2005, at which time he resigned as an officer but remained a director of the Company until his resignation on October 20, 2008.

Mark Lawson, Director. Mr. Lawson has been working in corporate finance since 1995, upon completion of his Bachelor of Arts, Statistical Sciences, complemented by a Master’s degree in Business Administration in 2005. Between 1996 and 2001 Mr. Lawson was employed as Mutual Fund Specialist by the Royal Bank of Canada Investments. In 2001 up until 2003, Mr. Lawson joined AIM Funds Management. Between 2003 and 2004 Mr Lawson was employed as Director of Newhaven Corporate Finance. In 2005 Mr Lawson joined the Global Investment Banking Coverage –– Healthcare department of Morgan Stanley.

Albert Beerli, Director. Mr. Beerli has served as a director of the Company since March 2006. Mr. Beerli is a scientist, having received his Ph.D in chemical engineering in 1969. Since 1988 Mr. Beerli has been the Chief Executive Officer of Zenwex AG in Zug, Switzerland. Zenwex AG provides consulting services on scientific and technical matters.

Michel St-Pierre, Acting Chief Financial Officer. Mr. St-Pierre has served as an officer of the Company since July 2006. Mr. St-Pierre is a registered chartered accountant in Quebec, Canada. Before working for the Company, Mr. St-Pierre has served as Chief Financial Officer of a public shell company, Tiger Renewable Energy Limited (formerly known as Tiger Ethanol International Inc. and Arch Management) since January, 2007 and held positions as the Finance Director (comparable to Corporate Treasurer) at SPB Canada Inc. from 2004-2006, Symbior Technologies Inc. from 2003-2004, and Boulangeries Comas Inc. from 2000-2003.

Compliance With Section 16(a) Of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 requires our executive officers and directors, and persons who beneficially own more than 10% of our equity securities, to file reports of ownership and changes in ownership with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Officers, directors and greater than 10% shareholders are required by SEC regulation to furnish the Company with copies of all Section 16(a) forms they file. Based on our review of the copies of such forms we received, we believe that during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011 all such filing requirements applicable to our officers and directors were complied with, except that reports were filed late by the following persons:

-31-

Name and principal position	Number of Late Reports	Transactions Not Timely Known Failures to File a
Name and principal position	Number of Late Reports	Reported	Required Form
Jeung Kwak	2	2009	Form 3
Michael Sigel	2	2010	Form 4
Robert Egger Jr.	1	2009	Form 3
Michel St-Pierre	4	2011	Form 4
	1	2010	Form 4
Claude Pellerin	3	2011	Form 4

Audit Committee

We have a separately-designated audit committee of the board. Our audit committee is responsible for: (1) selection and oversight of our independent accountant; (2) establishing procedures for the receipt, retention and treatment of complaints regarding accounting, internal controls and auditing matters; (3) establishing procedures for the confidential, anonymous submission by our employees of concerns regarding accounting and auditing matters; (4) engaging outside advisors; and, (5) funding for the outside auditory and any outside advisors engagement by the audit committee. A copy of our audit committee charter is filed as an exhibit to this report. Up to February 25, 2009, our Audit Committee consisted of Lim Ping Wai whom was independent director; the full board has carried out the functions and responsibilities since her resignation.

Compensation Committee

The full board carries out the functions and responsibilities of this committee. This committee acts on behalf of our board of directors to approve compensation arrangements for our management and review the compensation paid to our board of directors. A copy of our Compensation Committee Charter was filed with our last 10KSB on March 31, 2008.

Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee

The full board carries out the functions and responsibilities of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. This committee acts on behalf of our board of directors and generally to identify and recommend nominees for our board and our committees, identify and recommend candidates for senior management, review and recommend to the board, or independently take, action on various company corporate governance issues, receive and respond to certain complaints raised by our employees regarding alleged illegal acts or behavior-related conduct by board members in violation of our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, supervise our chief financial officer in the context of the Ethics Code and carry-out other assignments as designated by our board. A copy of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee was filed with our last 10KSB on March 31, 2008.

Code of Ethics

We adopted a code of ethics on March 26, 2008. We adopted eight Corporate Values (Focus, Respect, Excellence, Accountability, Teamwork, Integrity, Very Open Communications and Enjoying Our Work) to provide a framework for all employees in conducting themselves in their jobs. These policies are not intended to substitute for those Values, but will serve as guidelines in helping employee to conduct our business in accordance with its Values. Compliance requires meeting the spirit, as well as the literal meaning, of the law, the policies and the Values. It is expected that employee will use common sense, good judgment, high ethical standards and integrity in all their business dealings.

As of March 31, 2011 we had seven directors. Our board determined that Mr. Lawson is independent. We have adopted those standards for independence contained in the Nasdaq Marketplaces Rules, Rule 4350(d) and Rule 4200(a)(15). Messrs. Siegel, Kwak, Egger,Truong, Beerli and Pellerin are not independent.

-32-

ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION.

Compensation of Officers

Option award compensation is the fair value for stock options vested during the period, a notional amount estimated at the date of the grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. The actual value received by the executives may differ materially and adversely from that estimated. A summary of cash and other compensation paid in accordance with management consulting contracts for our Principal Executive Officer and other executives for the most recent three years is as follows:

Executive Officer Compensation Table

						Non-	Nonqualified
						Equity	Deferred	All
						Incentive	Compensa-	Other
				Stock	Option	Plan	tion	Compen-
Name and		Salary	Bonus	Awards	Awards	Compensation	Earnings	sation	Total
Principal Position	Year	(US$)	(US$)	(US$)	(US$)	(US$)	(US$)	(US$)	(US$)
(a)	(b)	(c)	(d)	(e)	(f)	(g)	(h)	(i)	(j)

Michael Siegel (2)	2011	120,000	0	0	0	0	0	0	120,000
Chief Executive Officer	2010	120,000	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
and President

John Kwak, (3)	2011	120,000	0	0	0	0	0	0	120,000
Chairman and Director	2010	120,000	0	0	0	0	0	0	120,000

Robert Egger Jr. (4)	2011	75,000	0	0	0	0	0	0	75,000
Chief Operating Officer	2010	60,000	0	0	0	0	0	0	60,000

Tri Vu Truong (5)	2011	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
Chief Executive Officer	2010	9,925	0	0	0.	0	0	0	9,925
and President, resigned

Claude Pellerin, (6)	2011	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
Director, President	2010	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
and CEO

Michel St-Pierre (7)	2011	20,000	0	0	0	0	0	0	20,000
CFO	2010	50,000	0	20,000	0	0	0	0	70,000

(1)	Prior to the acquisition of XL Generation AG, the Company’s fiscal year ended April 30th. XL Generation AG, our wholly-owned subsidiary, had a fiscal year ending December 31st. Following the acquisition of XL Generation AG, we adopted the fiscal year end of XL Generation AG.
(2)	Mr. Siegel has been appointed president and CEO on September 10, 2009.
(3)	Mr. Kwak has been appointed Chairman and director on June 16, 2009.
(4)	Mr. Egger has been appointed COO on September 10, 2009.
(5)	Mr. Truong has been appointed president and CEO on February 14, 2008. He resigned has President and CEO on September 10, 2009.
(6)	Mr. Pellerin was our president, CEO and a director from June 17, 2005 until August 19, 2005. He remains a director of our company.
(7)	Mr. St-Pierre has been our chief financial officer since July 28, 2006.
(8)	Mr. Gilmour served as our principal executive office from August 22, 2007 to February 14, 2008.

During the fiscal year ended 2009 and until his resignation, Mr. Tri Vu Truong served as our President and CEO.

Employment Contracts

During the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009, we terminated a Consulting Agreement with Sodexen Inc. (“Sodexen”) pursuant to which, Sodexen was providing the services of its representative, Dr. Tri Vu Truong to serve in the capacity of President and Chief Executive Officer of our company. The “Engagement Period” was for one year.

-33-

Other Executive Officers

During 2011, other than those disclosed above, no other employment contracts have been executed by our company for any other executive officer.

Retirement, Resignation or Termination Plans

We sponsor no plan, whether written or verbal, that would provide compensation or benefits of any type to an executive upon retirement, or any plan that would provide payment for retirement, resignation, or termination as a result of a change in control of our company or as a result of a change in the responsibilities of an executive following a change in control of our company.

Directors Compensation

The following table sets forth the compensation paid by us to our directors during our fiscal year ended December 31, 2011. This information includes the dollar value of base salaries, bonus awards and number of stock options granted, and certain other compensation, if any. The compensation discussed addresses all compensation awarded to, earned by, or paid to our named directors.

Director’s Compensation Table

	Fees
	Earned				Nonqualified
	or			Non-Equity	Deferred
	Paid in	Stock	Option	Incentive Plan	Compensation	All Other
	Cash	Awards	Awards	Compensation	Earnings	Compensation	Total
Name	(US$)	(US$)	(US$)	(US$)	(US$)	(US$)	(US$)
(a)	(b)	(c)	(d)	(e)	(f)	(g)	(h)
Michael Siegel	0	18,000	0	0	0	0	18,000

Mark Lawson	0	18,000	0	0	0	0	18,000

John Kwak	0	18,000	0	0	0	0	18,000

Robert Egger, Jr.	0	18,000	0	0	0	0	18,000

Claude Pellerin	0	18,000	0	0	0	0	18,000

Tri Vu Truong	0	18,000	0	0	0	0	18,000

Albert Beerli	0	18,000	0	0	0	0	18,000

There are no other stock option plans, retirement, pension, or profit sharing plans for the benefit of our sole director other than as described herein.

Indemnification

Pursuant to the articles of incorporation and bylaws of the corporation, we may indemnify an officer or director who is made a party to any proceeding, including a law suit, because of his position, if he acted in good faith and in a manner he reasonably believed to be in its best interest. In certain cases, we may advance expenses incurred in defending any such proceeding. To the extent that the officer or director is successful on the merits in any such proceeding as to which such person is to be indemnified, we must indemnify him against all expenses incurred, including attorneys fees. With respect to a derivative action, indemnity may be made only for expenses actually and reasonably incurred in defending the proceeding, and if the officer or director is judged liable, only by a court order. The indemnification is intended to be to the fullest extent permitted by the laws of the State of Nevada.

-34-

Regarding indemnification for liabilities arising under the Securities Act of 1933 which may be permitted for directors or officers pursuant to the foregoing provisions, we are informed that, in the opinion of the Securities and Exchange Commission, such indemnification is against public policy, as expressed in the Act and is therefore unenforceable.

ITEM 12.

SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS.

The following table sets forth certain information regarding the beneficial ownership of our common stock as of the date of this Report by (i) each of our directors, (ii) each of our officers named in the Summary Compensation Table, (iii) each person who is known by us to be the beneficial owner of more than five percent of our outstanding common stock, and (iv) all directors and executive officers as a group. Except as otherwise indicated below, each person named has sole voting and investment power with respect to the shares indicated. The percentage of ownership set forth below reflects each holder’s ownership interest in the 199,033,379 shares of our common stock outstanding as of March 31, 2012.

Amount and Nature of Beneficial Ownership

Name and Address of Beneficial Owner (1)	Shares	Options/ Warrants	Total	Percent
Michael Siegel (2)	21,070,000	0	21,070,000	10.59%
Jeung Kwak (3)	26,600,000	0	26,600,000	13.36%
Robert Egger Jr. (4)	2,700,000	0	2,700,000	1.36%
Tri Vu Truong (5)	4,250,000	0	4,250,000	2.14%
Claude Pellerin, (6)	787,080	200,000	987,080	0%
Albert Beerli (7)	1,500,000	100,000	1,600,000	0.8%
Michel St-Pierre (8)	7,500,000	700,000	8,200,000	4.12%
All executive officers and directors as a group (7 persons)	64,407,080	1,000,000	64,407,080	32.36%
Bradley Snower (9)	14,000,000	0	14,000,000	7.03%
United Best Technology Limited (5)	3,500,000	0	3,500,000	1.76%
Cede & Co (10)	85,947,161	0	85,147,161	43.18%

(1)	The mailing address for each of the listed individuals is c/o Ecolocap Solutions International Inc., 1250 S. Grove Ave, Suite 308, Barrington, Illinois, 60010.
(2)	Owner of 5% or more of our common stock. Mr.Siegel, is the President and Chief Executive Officer.
(3)	Owner of 5% or more of our common stock. Mr. Kwak, is Chairman of the Board of Directors.
(4)	Director. Mr.Egger, is the Chief Operating Officer.
(5)	Director. Mr. Truong, is the President and Chief Executive Officer of United Best Technology Limited.
(6)	Director
(7)	Director
(8)	Chief Financial Officer.
(9)	Owner of 5% or more of our common stock.
(10)	Owner of 5% or more of our common stock.

Equity Incentive Plan

On March 31, 2006, our Board of Directors adopted the 2006 Equity Incentive Plan, which authorizes us to issue options for the purchase of up to 2,000,000 shares of our common stock, pursuant to the terms and conditions set forth therein. The Equity Incentive Plan authorizes the issuance of incentive stock options (ISO) and non-qualified stock options (NQOs) to our employees, directors or consultants.

During the year ended December 31, 2006, we issued 1,455,000 stock options to our officers and directors with an average exercise price of $1.05 per share. Of the stock options issued, 320,000 were vested on September 6, 2006, 150,000 were vested on September 7, 2006, 25,000 were vested on September 15, 2006, 150,000 were vested on December 25, 2006, 660,000 will vest on September 6, 2007 and the balance will vest on September 6, 2008. These options expire on September 6, 2008 (240,000), September 15, 2008 (25,000), December 25, 2006 (150,000), September 6, 2013 (440,000) and September 6, 2016 (600,000). The options had a fair value of $1,526,989 at the date of grant.

-35-

During the month of December 2007, we issued 425,000 stock options to our officers and directors with an average exercise price of $1.25 per share. All of the stock options issued vested on December 12, 2007. The options had a fair value of $530,543 at the date of grant.

As of March 30, 2012, we had approximately seven directors and officers eligible to receive options under the Equity Incentive Plan. Options to buy 1,465,000 shares of common stock were outstanding under the Equity Incentive Plan and 120,000 shares remained available for grants under this plan.

Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year End for Named Executives

									Equity
								Equity	Incentive
								Incentive	Plan Awards:
			Equity				Market	Plan Awards:	Market or
			Incentive			Number	Value of	Number of	Payout Value
			Plan Awards:			of Shares	Shares or	Unearned	of Unearned
	Number of	Number of	Number of			or Units	Units of	Shares, Units	Shares, Units
	Securities	Securities	Securities			of Stock	Stock	or Other	or Other
	Underlying	Underlying	Unexercised	Option	Option	That	That	Rights That	Rights That
	Unexercised	Unexercised	Unearned	Exercise	Expiration	Have Not	Have	Have Not	Have Note
Name	Options(1)	Options	Options	Price	Date	Vested	Vested	Vested	Vested
(a)	(b)	(c)	(d)	(e)	(f)	(g)	(h)	(i)	(j)
	Exercisable	Unexercisable

Alexander Gilmour	125,000	0	0	1.05	09/06/13	0	0	0	0
	125,000	0	0	1.25	12/12/12	0	0	0	0

Arthur Rawl	115,000	0	0	1.05	09/06/13	0	0	0	0
	100,000	0	0	1.25	12/12/12	0	0	0	0

Claude Pellerin	100,000	0	0	1.05	09/06/13	0	0	0	0
	100,000	0	0	1.25	12/12/12	0	0	0	0

Albert Beerli	100,000	0	0	1.05	09/06/13	0	0	0	0

Michel St-Pierre	250,000	0	0	0.01	09/06/16	0	0	0	0
	200,000	0	0	0.01	09/06/16	0	0	0	0
	150,000	0	0	0.01	09/06/16	0	0	0	0
	100,000	0	0	1.25	12/12/12	0	0	0	0

ITEM 13.

CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE.

In 2011, the Company received loans from a stockholder in the amount of $40,000. These loans carry an interest of 1.63% and are payable on demand.

In 2011, the Company received loans from stockholders in the amount of $245,769. These loans carry an interest of 5.00% and are payable on demand.

In 2011, the Company received loans from Hanscom K. Inc. in the amount of $36,250. These loans have no interest and are payable on demand.

Law Firm of Pellerin Attorneys

In the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011, the law firm of Pellerin Attorneys (Montreal) received CAD $38,115 (approximately US $38,667) from our company for legal services rendered by Mr. Claude Pellerin S.N., one of our directors and corporate secretary.

-36-

ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES.

(1) Audit Fees

The aggregate fees billed for each of the last three fiscal years for professional services rendered by the principal accountant for our audit of annual consolidated financial statements and reviews of our interim consolidated financial statements included in our Form 10-Q and Form 10-K or services that are normally provided by the accountant in connection with statutory and regulatory filings or engagements for those fiscal years was:

2011	$	12,625
2010	$	14,150

(2) Audit-Related Fees

The aggregate fees billed in each of the last three fiscal years for assurance and related services by the principal accountants that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of our consolidated financial statements and are not reported in the preceding paragraph:

2011	$	0
2010	$	0

(3) Tax Fees

The aggregate fees billed in each of the last three fiscal years for professional services rendered by the principal accountant for tax compliance, tax advice, and tax planning was:

2011	$	0
2010	$	0

(4) All Other Fees

The aggregate fees billed in each of the last three fiscal years for the products and services provided by the principal accountant, other than the services reported in paragraphs (1), (2), and (3) was:

2011	$	0
2010	$	0

(5) Our audit committees pre-approval policies and procedures described in paragraph (c) (7) (i) of Rule 2-01 of Regulation S-X were that the audit committee pre-approves all accounting related activities prior to the performance of any services by any accountant or auditor.

(6) The percentage of hours expended on the principal accountants engagement to audit our consolidated financial statements for the most recent fiscal year that were attributed to work performed by persons other than the principal accountants full time, permanent employees, to the best of our knowledge, was 0%.

Audit Committee Pre-Approval Policies

Our Audit Committee reviewed the audit and non-audit services rendered by Paritz & Company, P.A. during the periods set forth above and concluded that such services were compatible with maintaining the auditors’ independence. All audit and non-audit services performed by our independent accountants are pre-approved by our Audit Committee to assure that such services do not impair the auditors’ independence from us.

-37-

PART IV. OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 15. EXHIBITS AND CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES.

The following is a complete list of exhibits filed as part of this annual report:

		Incorporated by reference
Exhibit Number	Document Description	Form	Date	Number	Filed herewith
3.1	Articles of Incorporation, as amended.	SB-2	5/28/04	3.1

3.2	Bylaws.	SB-2	5/28/04	3.2

3.3	Certificate of Amendment to Articles of Incorporation.	10-QSB	12/30/05	3.3

3.4	Bylaws, as amended on March 17, 2006.	10-KSB	4/13/06	3.4

10.1	Letter of Intent with XL Generation AG.	8-K	7/6/05	99.1

10.2	Share Exchange Agreement with XL Generation AG.	8-K	8/19/05	99.1

10.3	Loan Agreement with Capex Investments.	8-K	9/14/05	99.1

10.4	Form of Indemnification Agreement with Capex Investments Limited.	8-K/A	11/1/05	10.4

10.5	Common Stock Purchase Agreement with Capex Investments Limited.	8-K	11/15/05	10.5

10.6	Common Stock Purchase Agreement with Aton Selct Fund Limited.	8-K	11/15/05	10.6

10.7	Common Stock Purchase Agreement with Asset Protection Fund Limited.	8-K	11/15/05	10.7

10.8	Series A Warrant to Purchase Shares of Common Stock to Capex Investments Limited.	8-K	11/15/05	10.8

10.9	Series A Warrant to Purchase Shares of Common Stock to Aton Select Fund Limited.	8-K	11/15/05	10.9

10.10	Series A Warrant to Purchase Shares of Common Stock to Asset Protection Fund Limited.	8-K	11/15/05	10.10

10.11	Registration Rights Agreement with Capex Investments Limited.	8-K	11/15/05	10.11

10.12	Registration Rights Agreement with Aton Select Fund Limited.	8-K	11/15/05	10.12

10.13	Registration Rights Agreement with Asset Protection Fund Limited.	8-K	11/15/05	10.13

10.14	Amendment to the Common Stock Purchase Agreement with Aton Select Fund Limited.	8-K	12/08/05	10.14

-38-

10.15	Amendment to the Common Stock Purchase Agreement with Asset Protection Fund Limited.	8-K	12/08/05	10.15

10.16	Lease Agreement with 866 U.N. Plaza Associates LLC.	10-QSB	12/30/05	10.16

10.17	Exclusive Manufacturing License Agreement and Non-Exclusive Distribution Agreement with APW Inc.	10-QSB	12/30/05	10.17

10.18	Common Stock Purchase Agreement with Professional Trading Services SA.	SB-2	1/13/06	10.18

10.19	Series B Warrant to Purchase Shares of Common Stock to Professional Trading Services SA.	SB-2	1/13/06	10.19

10.20	Registration Rights Agreement with Professional Trading Services SA.	SB-2	1/13/06	10.20

10.21	Amended and Restated Common Stock Purchase Agreement with Bank Sal. Oppenheim Jr. & Cie. (Switzerland) Limited.	SB-2	1/13/06	10.21

10.22	Series B Warrant to Purchase Shares of Common Stock to Bank Sal. Oppenheim Jr. & Cie. (Switzerland) Limited.	SB-2	1/13/06	10.22

10.23	Agreement of Withdrawal from Stadium SA.	SB-2	1/13/06	10.23

10.24	License Agreement with WKF/5 Ltd.	SB-2	1/13/06	10.24

10.25	Amendment to License Agreement with WKF/5 Ltd and Alain Lemieux.	SB-2	1/13/06	10.25

10.26	Form of Subscription Agreement.	SB-2	5/28/04	99.1

10.27	Employment Agreement with Alain Lemieux.	10-KSB	4/13/06	10.27

10.28	Employment Agreement with Daniel Courteau.	10-KSB	4/13/06	10.28

10.29	Employment Agreement with Flemming Munck.	10-KSB	4/13/06	10.29

10.30	Employment Agreement with Eric Giguere.	10-KSB	4/13/06	10.30

10.31	Endorsement Agreement with La Societe 421 Productions.	10-KSB	4/13/06	10.31

10.32	Summary of terms and conditions of Oral Consulting Agreement with Greendale Consulting Limited.	10-KSB	4/13/06	10.32

10.33	Exclusive Manufacturing License Agreement with Polyprod Inc.	10-KSB	4/13/06	10.33

10.34	Management Fee Arrangement with Polyprod Inc.	10-KSB	4/13/06	10.34

10.35	Supply Contract with Febra- Kunststoffe GimbH and BASF Aktiengesellschaft.	10-KSB	4/13/06	10.35

10.36	Loan Agreement with Fiducie Alain Lemieux.	10-KSB	4/13/06	10.36

-39-

10.37	Confirmation of Debt.	10-KSB	4/13/06	10.37

10.38	Agreement with Daniel Courteau regarding Repayment of loans to Symbior Technologies Inc.	10-KSB	4/13/06	10.38

10.39	2006 Equity Incentive Plan.	10-KSB	4/13/06	10.39

10.40	Loan Agreement with Albert Beerli.	10-KSB	4/13/06	10.40

10.41	Summary of terms and conditions of Loan Agreement with Albert Beerli.	10-KSB	4/13/06	10.41

10.42	Lease Agreement with Albert Beerli.	10-KSB	4/13/06	10.42

10.43	Memorandum regarding XL Generation Canada Inc.	10-KSB	4/13/06	10.43

10.44	Stock Purchase Agreement with XL Generation AG and Stadium SA.	10-KSB	4/13/06	10.44

10.45	Common Stock Purchase Agreement with Poma Management SA.	10-QSB	9/13/06	10.45

10.46	Common Stock Purchase Agreement with Aton Select Fund Limited.	10-QSB	9/13/06	10.46

10.47	Consulting Agreement by and between Ecolocap Solutions Inc. and Lakeview Consulting LLC.	8-K	11/11/08	10.47

10.48	“ERPA” with Hong Kong Construction Investment Joint Stock Company.	8-K	12/23/08	10.1

10.49	“ERPA” with Thuong Hai Joint Stock Company.	8-K	12/23/08	10.2

10.50	“ERPA” with Vietnam Power Development Joint Stock Company.	8-K	12/23/08	10.3

10.51	“ERPA” with Hop Xuan Investment Joint Stock Company, Vietnam.	8-K	12/23/08	10.4

10.52	“ERPA” with ThangLong Education Development and Construction Import Export Investment Joint Stock Company.	8-K	12/23/08	10.5

10.53	Revised Consulting Agreement with Sodexen Inc.	8-K	12/23/08	10.6

10.54	Agreement with United Best Technology Limited.	8-K	12/23/08	10.7

10.55	Escrow Agreement with United Best Technology Limited.	8-K	12/23/08	10.8

10.56	“ERPA” with Tan Hiep Phuc Electricity Construction Joint-Stock Company Vietnam.	8-K	12/23/08	10.9

10.57	“ERPA” with Tuan Anh Hydraulic Development and Construction Investment Corporation, Vietnam.	8-K	12/23/08	10.10

-40-

10.58	“ERPA” with Lao Cai Energy & Resources Investment Joint Stock Company, Vietnam.	8-K	12/23/08	10.11

10.59	“ERPA” with Xiangton Iron and Steel Group Co. Ltd.	8-K	12/23/08	10.12

10.60	“ERPA” with Hunan Valin Xiangton Iron & Steel Co. Ltd.	8-K	12/23/08	10.13

10.61	“ERPA” with Hebi Coal Industry (Group) Co. Ltd.	8-K	12/23/08	10.14

10.62	“ERPA” with Hebei Jinlong Cement Group Co., Ltd.	8-K	12/23/08	10.15

10.63	“ERPA” with Bao Tan Hydro Electric Joint-Stock Company.	8-K	12/23/08	10.16

10.64	“ERPA” with Construction and Infrastruction Development Joint-Stock Company Number Nine.	8-K	12/23/08	10.17

10.65	Greenhouse Gas Offset Management Services Representation Agreement.	8-K	12/23/08	10.18

10.66	“ERPA” with Xinjiang Xiangjianfeng Energy and Technology Development Co. Ltd.	8-K	12/23/08	10.19

10.67	Technical Service Agreement with Xinjiang Xiangjinfeng Energy and Technology Development Co., Ltd.	8-K	12/23/08	10.20

10.68	Technical Service Agreement with Hebei Fengda Metallized Pellet Co., Ltd.	8-K	12/23/08	10.21

10.69	“ERPA” with Hebei Fengda Metallized Pellet Co., Ltd.	8-K	12/23/08	10.22

10.70	“ERPA” with Shandong Chengzeyuan Environment Protection Engineering Co. Ltd.	8-K	12/23/08	10.23

10.71	Technical Services Agreement with Shandong Chengzeyuan Environment Protection Engineering Co., Ltd.	8-K	12/23/08	10.24

10.72	Technical Services Agreement with Leshan Kingssun Group Co. Ltd.	8-K	12/23/08	10.25

10.73	“ERPA” with Leshan Kingssun Group Co., Ltd.	8-K	12/23/08	10.26

10.74	Standstill Agreement.	8-K	3/23/12	10.1

10.75	Second Standstill Agreement.	8-K	3/23/12	10.2

14.1	Code of Ethics.	10-KSB	3/31/08	14.1

31.1	Certification of Principal Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.				X

31.2	Certification of Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.				X

-41-

32.1	Certification pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 for the Chief Executive Officer.				X

32.2	Certification pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 for the Chief Financial Officer.				X

99.1	Audit Committee Charter.	10-KSB	3/31/08	99.1

99.2	Executive Committee Charter.	10-KSB	3/31/08	99.2

99.3	Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee Charter.	10-KSB	3/31/08	99.3

99.4	Stock Option Plan.	10-KSB	3/31/08	99.4

101.INS	XBRL Instance Document.				X

101.SCH	XBRL Taxonomy Extension – Schema.				X

101.CAL	XBRL Taxonomy Extension – Calculations.				X

101.DEF	XBRL Taxonomy Extension – Definitions.				X

101.LAB	XBRL Taxonomy Extension – Labels.				X

101.PRE	XBRL Taxonomy Extension – Presentation.				X

-42-

SIGNATURES

In accordance with Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act, the registrant caused this amended report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, on this 28th day of March 2012.

	ECOLOCAP SOLUTIONS INC.

	BY:	MICHAEL SIEGEL
		Michael Siegel
		Principal Executive Officer

	BY:	MICHEL ST-PIERRE
		Michel St-Pierre
		Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer

In accordance with the Exchange Act, this amended report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dated indicated.

Signature	Title	Date

MICHAEL SIEGEL	President, Chief Executive Officer, Treasurer, Chief	March 28, 2012
Michael Siegel	Financial Officer, and a member of the Board of Directors

MARK LAWSON	Director	March 30, 2012
Mark Lawson

JEUNG KWAK	Director	March 30, 2012
Jeung Kwak

ROBERT EGGER JR.	Director	March 28, 2012
Robert Egger Jr.

CLAUDE PELLERIN	Director	March 30, 2012
Claude Pellerin

TRI VU TRUONG	Director	March 30, 2012
Tri Vu Truong

_________________________________	Director	March ___, 2012
Albert Beerli

-43-

EXHIBIT INDEX

		Incorporated by reference
Exhibit Number	Document Description	Form	Date	Number	Filed herewith
3.1	Articles of Incorporation, as amended.	SB-2	5/28/04	3.1

3.2	Bylaws.	SB-2	5/28/04	3.2

3.3	Certificate of Amendment to Articles of Incorporation.	10-QSB	12/30/05	3.3

3.4	Bylaws, as amended on March 17, 2006.	10-KSB	4/13/06	3.4

10.1	Letter of Intent with XL Generation AG.	8-K	7/6/05	99.1

10.2	Share Exchange Agreement with XL Generation AG.	8-K	8/19/05	99.1

10.3	Loan Agreement with Capex Investments.	8-K	9/14/05	99.1

10.4	Form of Indemnification Agreement with Capex Investments Limited.	8-K/A	11/1/05	10.4

10.5	Common Stock Purchase Agreement with Capex Investments Limited.	8-K	11/15/05	10.5

10.6	Common Stock Purchase Agreement with Aton Selct Fund Limited.	8-K	11/15/05	10.6

10.7	Common Stock Purchase Agreement with Asset Protection Fund Limited.	8-K	11/15/05	10.7

10.8	Series A Warrant to Purchase Shares of Common Stock to Capex Investments Limited.	8-K	11/15/05	10.8

10.9	Series A Warrant to Purchase Shares of Common Stock to Aton Select Fund Limited.	8-K	11/15/05	10.9

10.10	Series A Warrant to Purchase Shares of Common Stock to Asset Protection Fund Limited.	8-K	11/15/05	10.10

10.11	Registration Rights Agreement with Capex Investments Limited.	8-K	11/15/05	10.11

10.12	Registration Rights Agreement with Aton Select Fund Limited.	8-K	11/15/05	10.12

10.13	Registration Rights Agreement with Asset Protection Fund Limited.	8-K	11/15/05	10.13

10.14	Amendment to the Common Stock Purchase Agreement with Aton Select Fund Limited.	8-K	12/08/05	10.14

10.15	Amendment to the Common Stock Purchase Agreement with Asset Protection Fund Limited.	8-K	12/08/05	10.15

10.16	Lease Agreement with 866 U.N. Plaza Associates LLC.	10-QSB	12/30/05	10.16

-44-

10.17	Exclusive Manufacturing License Agreement and Non-Exclusive Distribution Agreement with APW Inc.	10-QSB	12/30/05	10.17

10.18	Common Stock Purchase Agreement with Professional Trading Services SA.	SB-2	1/13/06	10.18

10.19	Series B Warrant to Purchase Shares of Common Stock to Professional Trading Services SA.	SB-2	1/13/06	10.19

10.20	Registration Rights Agreement with Professional Trading Services SA.	SB-2	1/13/06	10.20

10.21	Amended and Restated Common Stock Purchase Agreement with Bank Sal. Oppenheim Jr. & Cie. (Switzerland) Limited.	SB-2	1/13/06	10.21

10.22	Series B Warrant to Purchase Shares of Common Stock to Bank Sal. Oppenheim Jr. & Cie. (Switzerland) Limited.	SB-2	1/13/06	10.22

10.23	Agreement of Withdrawal from Stadium SA.	SB-2	1/13/06	10.23

10.24	License Agreement with WKF/5 Ltd.	SB-2	1/13/06	10.24

10.25	Amendment to License Agreement with WKF/5 Ltd and Alain Lemieux.	SB-2	1/13/06	10.25

10.26	Form of Subscription Agreement.	SB-2	5/28/04	99.1

10.27	Employment Agreement with Alain Lemieux.	10-KSB	4/13/06	10.27

10.28	Employment Agreement with Daniel Courteau.	10-KSB	4/13/06	10.28

10.29	Employment Agreement with Flemming Munck.	10-KSB	4/13/06	10.29

10.30	Employment Agreement with Eric Giguere.	10-KSB	4/13/06	10.30

10.31	Endorsement Agreement with La Societe 421 Productions.	10-KSB	4/13/06	10.31

10.32	Summary of terms and conditions of Oral Consulting Agreement with Greendale Consulting Limited.	10-KSB	4/13/06	10.32

10.33	Exclusive Manufacturing License Agreement with Polyprod Inc.	10-KSB	4/13/06	10.33

10.34	Management Fee Arrangement with Polyprod Inc.	10-KSB	4/13/06	10.34

10.35	Supply Contract with Febra- Kunststoffe GimbH and BASF Aktiengesellschaft.	10-KSB	4/13/06	10.35

10.36	Loan Agreement with Fiducie Alain Lemieux.	10-KSB	4/13/06	10.36

10.37	Confirmation of Debt.	10-KSB	4/13/06	10.37

10.38	Agreement with Daniel Courteau regarding Repayment of loans to Symbior Technologies Inc.	10-KSB	4/13/06	10.38

-45-

10.39	2006 Equity Incentive Plan.	10-KSB	4/13/06	10.39

10.40	Loan Agreement with Albert Beerli.	10-KSB	4/13/06	10.40

10.41	Summary of terms and conditions of Loan Agreement with Albert Beerli.	10-KSB	4/13/06	10.41

10.42	Lease Agreement with Albert Beerli.	10-KSB	4/13/06	10.42

10.43	Memorandum regarding XL Generation Canada Inc.	10-KSB	4/13/06	10.43

10.44	Stock Purchase Agreement with XL Generation AG and Stadium SA.	10-KSB	4/13/06	10.44

10.45	Common Stock Purchase Agreement with Poma Management SA.	10-QSB	9/13/06	10.45

10.46	Common Stock Purchase Agreement with Aton Select Fund Limited.	10-QSB	9/13/06	10.46

10.47	Consulting Agreement by and between Ecolocap Solutions Inc. and Lakeview Consulting LLC.	8-K	11/11/08	10.47

10.48	“ERPA” with Hong Kong Construction Investment Joint Stock Company.	8-K	12/23/08	10.1

10.49	“ERPA” with Thuong Hai Joint Stock Company.	8-K	12/23/08	10.2

10.50	“ERPA” with Vietnam Power Development Joint Stock Company.	8-K	12/23/08	10.3

10.51	“ERPA” with Hop Xuan Investment Joint Stock Company, Vietnam.	8-K	12/23/08	10.4

10.52	“ERPA” with ThangLong Education Development and Construction Import Export Investment Joint Stock Company.	8-K	12/23/08	10.5

10.53	Revised Consulting Agreement with Sodexen Inc.	8-K	12/23/08	10.6

10.54	Agreement with United Best Technology Limited.	8-K	12/23/08	10.7

10.55	Escrow Agreement with United Best Technology Limited.	8-K	12/23/08	10.8

10.56	“ERPA” with Tan Hiep Phuc Electricity Construction Joint-Stock Company Vietnam.	8-K	12/23/08	10.9

10.57	“ERPA” with Tuan Anh Hydraulic Development and Construction Investment Corporation, Vietnam.	8-K	12/23/08	10.10

10.58	“ERPA” with Lao Cai Energy & Resources Investment Joint Stock Company, Vietnam.	8-K	12/23/08	10.11

10.59	“ERPA” with Xiangton Iron and Steel Group Co. Ltd.	8-K	12/23/08	10.12

-46-

10.60	“ERPA” with Hunan Valin Xiangton Iron & Steel Co. Ltd.	8-K	12/23/08	10.13

10.61	“ERPA” with Hebi Coal Industry (Group) Co. Ltd.	8-K	12/23/08	10.14

10.62	“ERPA” with Hebei Jinlong Cement Group Co., Ltd.	8-K	12/23/08	10.15

10.63	“ERPA” with Bao Tan Hydro Electric Joint-Stock Company.	8-K	12/23/08	10.16

10.64	“ERPA” with Construction and Infrastruction Development Joint-Stock Company Number Nine.	8-K	12/23/08	10.17

10.65	Greenhouse Gas Offset Management Services Representation Agreement.	8-K	12/23/08	10.18

10.66	“ERPA” with Xinjiang Xiangjianfeng Energy and Technology Development Co. Ltd.	8-K	12/23/08	10.19

10.67	Technical Service Agreement with Xinjiang Xiangjinfeng Energy and Technology Development Co., Ltd.	8-K	12/23/08	10.20

10.68	Technical Service Agreement with Hebei Fengda Metallized Pellet Co., Ltd.	8-K	12/23/08	10.21

10.69	“ERPA” with Hebei Fengda Metallized Pellet Co., Ltd.	8-K	12/23/08	10.22

10.70	“ERPA” with Shandong Chengzeyuan Environment Protection Engineering Co. Ltd.	8-K	12/23/08	10.23

10.71	Technical Services Agreement with Shandong Chengzeyuan Environment Protection Engineering Co., Ltd.	8-K	12/23/08	10.24

10.72	Technical Services Agreement with Leshan Kingssun Group Co. Ltd.	8-K	12/23/08	10.25

10.73	“ERPA” with Leshan Kingssun Group Co., Ltd.	8-K	12/23/08	10.26

10.74	Standstill Agreement.	8-K	3/23/12	10.1

10.75	Second Standstill Agreement.	8-K	3/23/12	10.2

14.1	Code of Ethics.	10-KSB	3/31/08	14.1

31.1	Certification of Principal Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.				X

31.2	Certification of Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.				X

32.1	Certification pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 for the Chief Executive Officer.				X

32.2	Certification pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 for the Chief Financial Officer.				X

-47-

99.1	Audit Committee Charter.	10-KSB	3/31/08	99.1

99.2	Executive Committee Charter.	10-KSB	3/31/08	99.2

99.3	Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee Charter.	10-KSB	3/31/08	99.3

99.4	Stock Option Plan.	10-KSB	3/31/08	99.4

101.INS	XBRL Instance Document.				X

101.SCH	XBRL Taxonomy Extension – Schema.				X

101.CAL	XBRL Taxonomy Extension – Calculations.				X

101.DEF	XBRL Taxonomy Extension – Definitions.				X

101.LAB	XBRL Taxonomy Extension – Labels.				X

101.PRE	XBRL Taxonomy Extension – Presentation.				X

-48-

Attached files

Stock widget

Investing forum

ECOLOCAP SOLUTIONS INC. Reports

Also read