Attached files
file | filename |
---|---|
EX-23 - AUDITOR'S CONSENT - 1st FRANKLIN FINANCIAL CORP | ffc_ex23.htm |
EX-12 - RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES - 1st FRANKLIN FINANCIAL CORP | ffc_ex12.htm |
EX-32.2 - CERTIFICATION - 1st FRANKLIN FINANCIAL CORP | ffc_ex32z2.htm |
EX-31.2 - CERTIFICATION - 1st FRANKLIN FINANCIAL CORP | ffc_ex31z2.htm |
EX-10.G - EXECUTIVE BONUS PLAN - 1st FRANKLIN FINANCIAL CORP | ffc_ex10zg.htm |
EX-32.1 - CERTIFICATION - 1st FRANKLIN FINANCIAL CORP | ffc_ex32z1.htm |
EX-10.F - DIRECTOR COMPENSATION SUMMARY TERM SHEET - 1st FRANKLIN FINANCIAL CORP | ffc_ex10zf.htm |
EX-31.1 - CERTIFICATION - 1st FRANKLIN FINANCIAL CORP | ffc_ex31z1.htm |
10-K - FIRST FRANKLIN FINANCIAL CORPORATION 10-K - 1st FRANKLIN FINANCIAL CORP | ffc_10k.htm |
Exhibit 13 |
|
|
|
1st FRANKLIN FINANCIAL CORPORATION |
|
ANNUAL REPORT |
|
|
DECEMBER 31, 2011 |
|
| ||
| TABLE OF CONTENTS | ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| The Company |
| 1 |
|
|
|
|
| Chairman's Letter |
| 2 |
|
|
|
|
| Selected Consolidated Financial Information |
| 3 |
|
|
|
|
| Business |
| 4 |
|
|
|
|
| Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
| 12 |
|
|
|
|
| Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm |
| 20 |
|
|
|
|
| Consolidated Financial Statements |
| 21 |
|
|
|
|
| Directors and Executive Officers |
| 43 |
|
|
|
|
| Corporate Information |
| 43 |
|
|
|
|
| Ben F. Cheek, Jr. Office of the Year |
| 45 |
|
|
|
|
|
THE COMPANY |
|
1st Franklin Financial Corporation, a Georgia corporation, has been engaged in the consumer finance business since 1941, particularly in making direct cash loans and real estate loans. As of December 31, 2011 the business was operated through 106 branch offices in Georgia, 39 in Alabama, 39 in South Carolina, 32 in Mississippi, 27 in Louisiana and 15 in Tennessee. Also on that date, the Company had 1,074 employees. |
|
As of December 31, 2011, the resources of the Company were invested principally in loans, which comprised 68% of the Company's assets. The majority of the Company's revenues are derived from finance charges earned on loans and other outstanding receivables. Our remaining revenues are derived from earnings on investment securities, insurance income and other miscellaneous income. |
1
To our Investors, Bankers, Co-Workers, Customers and Friends: |
1st Franklin Financial celebrated its 70th year in business during 2011 and I am pleased to report that it was another banner year for our company. As you review the information following this letter, you will find that we enjoyed record financial results and that the overall strength of our balance sheet and capital structure places us on a solid foundation for future growth and expansion. Our assets at the end of 2011 stood at $464.9 million which was an increase of 10% over 2010 and our retained earnings which were added to the capital base grew by 15%. Each of these figures is important as we set our plans and goals for the years ahead. The year 2011 was certainly a year with many highlights and rewarding accomplishments and I would like to mention and reflect on just a few that seem particularly significant. · Funds provided by our investors in our Investment Center grew by $20.8 million which funded all of our lending activity for the year. · Six (6) new branch offices were opened, Bastrop, Thibodaux and LaPlace in Louisiana, Hartsville in South Carolina, Philadelphia in Mississippi and Dublin in Georgia. · We continued to leverage technology by replacing a substantial number of the workstations and printer/scanner/ copiers in the branches. · We began working to re-design and update our 1ffc.com website which will launch in 2012. · We began exploring new marketing initiatives through email marketing and messages. · A Live check product was offered to our loan customers and it was enthusiastically received. · More on-line services such as on-line statements, applications and payment options were offered to both our loan customers and investors. · And, a continuing effort by our Management Team in cooperation with our two national trade associations was made in order to educate members of Congress and federal regulators about our industry. Naturally, we are proud of these accomplishments and we look forward to building on these and others as we move further into 2012. Positive people positive results was our theme for 2011 and I feel that the years results reflect the positive commitment to excellence that was made by all of the Friendly Franklin Folks. 1st Class customer service is the goal that we strive for each day and that is a continuing goal as we look forward to a challenging and exciting future. As always, my thanks go out to each of you, our investors, our bankers, our co-workers and other friends. We treasure your confidence and support and look forward to 2012 and beyond as we follow our new theme A legacy of service and uncompromising integrity. Very sincerely yours, |
|
/s/ Ben F. Cheek, III |
|
Ben F. Cheek, III |
Chairman of the Board and CEO |
2
SELECTED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL INFORMATION |
Set forth below is selected consolidated financial information of the Company. This information should be read in conjunction with Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and the more detailed consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included herein. |
| Year Ended December 31 | ||||
| 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 |
Selected Income Statement Data: | (In 000's, except ratio data) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
Interest and Finance Charges | $ 111,730 | $ 103,150 | $ 99,337 | $ 98,212 | $ 91,415 |
Insurance | 39,440 | 36,521 | 35,375 | 35,191 | 33,799 |
Other | 6,724 | 5,790 | 5,134 | 5,207 | 5,083 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Interest Income | 100,089 | 90,711 | 85,655 | 83,484 | 75,669 |
Interest Expense | 11,641 | 12,439 | 13,682 | 14,728 | 15,746 |
Provision for Loan Losses | 19,009 | 20,907 | 29,302 | 25,725 | 21,434 |
Income Before Income Taxes | 32,229 | 23,423 | 11,050 | 13,761 | 15,754 |
Net Income | 29,123 | 20,683 | 8,373 | 10,665 | 12,205 |
Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges | 3.42 | 2.67 | 1.72 | 1.86 | 1.92 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| As of December 31 | ||||
| 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 |
Selected Balance Sheet Data: | (In 000's, except ratio data) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Loans | $ 317,959 | $ 294,974 | $ 279,093 | $ 285,580 | $ 276,655 |
Total Assets | 464,885 | 422,064 | 396,425 | 389,422 | 402,454 |
Senior Debt | 243,801 | 208,492 | 186,849 | 169,672 | 182,373 |
Subordinated Debt | 46,870 | 59,780 | 74,884 | 86,605 | 91,966 |
Stockholders Equity | 153,585 | 132,710 | 117,115 | 116,236 | 109,841 |
Ratio of Total Liabilities to Stockholders Equity | 2.03 | 2.18 | 2.38 | 2.35 | 2.66 |
3
BUSINESS |
References in this Annual Report to 1st Franklin, the Company, we, our and us refer to 1st Franklin Financial Corporation and its subsidiaries. |
1st Franklin is engaged in the consumer finance business, particularly in making consumer loans to individuals in relatively small amounts for relatively short periods of time, and in making first and second mortgage loans on real estate in larger amounts and for longer periods of time. We also purchase sales finance contracts from various retail dealers. At December 31, 2011, direct cash loans comprised 90%, real estate loans comprised 5% and sales finance contracts comprised 5% of our outstanding loans, respectively. |
|
In connection with our business, we also offer optional credit insurance coverage to our customers when making a loan. Such coverage may include credit life insurance, credit accident and health insurance, and/or credit property insurance. Customers may request credit life insurance coverage to help assure any outstanding loan balance is repaid if the customer dies before the loan is repaid or they may request accident and health insurance coverage to help continue loan payments if the customer becomes sick or disabled for an extended period of time. Customers may also choose property insurance coverage to protect the value of loan collateral against damage, theft or destruction. We write these various insurance products as an agent for a non-affiliated insurance company. Under various agreements, our wholly-owned insurance subsidiaries, Frandisco Life Insurance Company and Frandisco Property and Casualty Insurance Company, reinsure the insurance coverage on our customers written on behalf of this non-affiliated insurance company. |
Earned finance charges generally account for the majority of our revenues. The following table shows the sources of our earned finance charges in each of the past five years: |
| Year Ended December 31 | |||||||
| 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | |||
| (in thousands) | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
| Direct Cash Loans | $101,683 | $ 92,915 | $88,648 | $85,392 | $77,472 | ||
| Real Estate Loans | 3,539 | 3,631 | 3,676 | 3,857 | 3,878 | ||
| Sales Finance Contracts | 3,637 | 3,929 | 4,171 | 5,186 | 5,814 | ||
| Total Finance Charges | $108,859 | $100,475 | $96,495 | $94,435 | $87,164 |
Our business consists mainly of making loans to salaried people and other wage earners who depend primarily on their earnings to meet their repayment obligations. We make direct cash loans primarily to people who need money for some non-recurring or unforeseen expense, including for debt consolidation or to purchase household goods such as furniture and appliances. These loans are generally repayable in 6 to 60 monthly installments and generally do not exceed $10,000 principal amount. The loans are generally secured by personal property (other than certain household goods), motor vehicles and/or real estate. We believe that the interest and fees we charge on these loans are in compliance with applicable federal and state laws. |
|
First and second mortgage loans on real estate are made to homeowners who typically use funds to improve their property or who wish to restructure their financial obligations. We generally make such loans in amounts from $3,000 to $50,000 and with maturities of 35 to 180 months. We believe that the interest and fees we charge on these loans are in compliance with applicable federal and state laws. |
|
Our decision making on loan originations is based on perceived (i) ability to pay, (ii) creditworthiness, (iii) stability, (iv) willingness to pay and (v) collateral security. The Company does not utilize credit score modeling or risk based pricing in its loan decision making. Prior to the making of a loan, we complete what the Company considers to be a relevant credit investigation on a potential customer. Such investigation primarily focuses on a evaluation of a potential borrowers income, existing total indebtedness, length and stability of employment, trade or other references, debt payment history (including related collections), existing credit and any other relationships such potential borrower may have with the Company. The Company considers and evaluates a potential borrowers debt-to-disposable income ratio after giving effect to the potential loan and may, in certain instances and depending upon the overall results of the credit evaluation process, require additional internal review and supervisory approvals prior to approving a proposed loan. |
|
Sales finance contracts are those contracts which are purchased from retail dealers. These contracts have maturities that generally range from 3 to 60 months and generally do not individually exceed $10,000 in principal amount. We believe that the interest rates we charge on these contracts are in compliance with applicable federal and state laws. |
|
1st Franklin competes with several national and regional finance companies, as well as a variety of local finance companies, in the communities we serve. Competition is based primarily on interest rates and terms offered and on customer service, as well as, to some extent, reputation. We believe that our emphasis on customer service helps us compete effectively in the markets we serve. |
|
Because of our reliance on the continued income stream of most of our loan customers, our ability to continue the profitable operation of our business depends to a large extent on the continued employment of these people and their ability to meet their obligations as they become due. Therefore, a continuation of the current uncertain economic conditions, a further increase in unemployment, or continued increases in the number of personal bankruptcies within our typical customer base, may have a material adverse effect on our collection ratios and profitability. |
|
The average annual yield on loans we make (the percentage of finance charges earned to average net outstanding balance) has been as follows: |
| Year Ended December 31 | ||||||
| 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Direct Cash Loans | 33.75% | 33.28% | 32.70% | 32.35% | 32.28% | ||
Real Estate Loans | 16.03 | 15.92 | 15.39 | 15.37 | 15.92 | ||
Sales Finance Contracts | 20.58 | 20.52 | 19.77 | 20.52 | 20.35 |
The following table contains certain information about our operations: |
| As of December 31 | ||||||
| 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Number of Branch Offices | 258 | 252 | 245 | 248 | 238 | ||
Number of Employees | 1,074 | 1,042 | 1,015 | 1,113 | 1,057 | ||
Average Total Loans Outstanding Per Branch (in 000's)
|
$1,622 |
$1,556 |
$1,530 |
$1,519 |
$1,515 | ||
Average Number of Loans Outstanding Per Branch | 724 | 701 | 689 | 683 | 713 |
5
DESCRIPTION OF LOANS |
| Year Ended December 31 | ||||
| 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 |
DIRECT CASH LOANS: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Loans Made to New Borrowers | 41,821 | 35,474 | 29,786 | 30,871 | 33,354 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Loans Made to Former Borrowers | 33,240 | 30,370 | 26,666 | 28,945 | 31,050 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Loans Made to Present Borrowers | 159,177 | 141,688 | 132,195 | 133,902 | 132,251 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Number of Loans Made | 234,238 | 207,532 | 188,647 | 193,718 | 196,655 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Volume of Loans Made (in 000s) | $550,120 | $485,604 | $437,575 | $453,968 | $441,462 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average Size of Loan Made | $2,349 | $2,340 | $2,320 | $2,343 | $2,245 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Loans Outstanding | 171,984 | 160,352 | 152,602 | 151,515 | 148,178 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Loans Outstanding (in 000s) | $376,568 | $347,445 | $327,425 | $324,996 | $303,679 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent of Total Loans Outstanding | 90% | 89% | 87% | 87% | 84% |
Average Balance on Outstanding Loans | $2,190 | $2,167 | $2,146 | $2,145 | $2,049 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
REAL ESTATE LOANS: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Number of Loans Made | 520 | 525 | 668 | 790 | 893 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Volume of Loans Made (in 000s) | $ 9,010 | $ 8,429 | $ 8,703 | $14,448 | $14,924 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average Size of Loan Made | $17,327 | $16,055 | $13,029 | $18,288 | $16,713 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Loans Outstanding | 1,776 | 1,905 | 2,015 | 2,032 | 2,007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Loans Outstanding (in 000s) | $22,123 | $22,967 | $24,336 | $24,176 | $25,052 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent of Total Loans Outstanding | 5% | 6% | 7% | 6% | 7% |
Average Balance on Outstanding Loans | $12,457 | $12,056 | $12,078 | $11,897 | $12,482 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
SALES FINANCE CONTRACTS: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Contracts Purchased | 13,939 | 14,947 | 13,212 | 15,407 | 20,548 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Volume of Contracts Purchased (in 000s) | $25,281 | $26,266 | $23,789 | $30,909 | $40,054 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average Size of Contract Purchased | $1,814 | $1,757 | $1,801 | $2,006 | $1,949 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Contracts Outstanding | 13,096 | 14,343 | 14,340 | 16,041 | 19,528 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Contracts Outstanding (in 000s) | $19,765 | $21,695 | $23,071 | $27,586 | $31,747 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent of Total Loans Outstanding | 5% | 5% | 6% | 7% | 9% |
Average Balance on Outstanding Contracts | $1,509 | $1,513 | $1,609 | $1,720 | $1,626 |
6
LOANS ORIGINATED, ACQUIRED, LIQUIDATED AND OUTSTANDING |
| Year Ended December 31 | ||||
| 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 |
(in thousands)
| LOANS ACQUIRED | ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Direct Cash Loans | $ 550,078 | $ 483,989 | $ 437,323 | $ 453,968 | $ 441,462 |
Real Estate Loans | 9,010 | 8,429 | 8,703 | 14,448 | 14,924 |
Sales Finance Contracts | 23,705 | 24,555 | 21,372 | 30,232 | 38,997 |
Net Bulk Purchases | 1,618 | 3,326 | 2,669 | 677 | 1,057 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Loans Acquired | $ 584,411 | $ 520,299 | $ 470,067 | $ 499,325 | $ 496,440 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| LOANS LIQUIDATED * | ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Direct Cash Loans | $ 520,997 | $ 465,584 | $ 435,146 | $ 432,651 | $ 405,782 |
Real Estate Loans | 9,854 | 9,798 | 8,543 | 15,324 | 13,436 |
Sales Finance Contracts | 27,211 | 27,642 | 28,304 | 35,070 | 42,031 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Loans Liquidated | $ 558,062 | $ 503,024 | $ 471,993 | $ 483,045 | $ 461,249 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| LOANS OUTSTANDING | ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Direct Cash Loans | $376,568 | $347,445 | $ 327,425 | $ 324,996 | $ 303,679 |
Real Estate Loans | 22,123 | 22,967 | 24,336 | 24,176 | 25,052 |
Sales Finance Contracts | 19,765 | 21,695 | 23,071 | 27,586 | 31,747 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Loans Outstanding | $418,456 | $392,107 | $ 374,832 | $ 376,758 | $ 360,478 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| UNEARNED FINANCE CHARGES | ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Direct Cash Loans | $ 46,297 | $ 42,724 | $ 40,002 | $ 39,933 | $ 35,850 |
Real Estate Loans | 317 | 284 | 208 | 41 | 118 |
Sales Finance Contracts | 2,593 | 2,803 | 3,121 | 4,058 | 4,753 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Unearned
Finance Charges | $ 49,207 | $ 45,811 | $ 43,331 | $ 44,032 | $ 40,721 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
______________________
* Liquidations include customer loan payments, refund on precomputed finance charges, renewals and charge offs.
7
DELINQUENCIES |
|
We classify delinquent accounts at the end of each month according to the number of installments past due at that time, based on the then-existing terms of the contract. Accounts are classified in delinquency categories based on the number of days past due. When three installments are past due, we classify the account as being 60-89 days past due; when four or more installments are past due, we classify the account as being 90 days or more past due. Once an account becomes greater than 149 days past due, our charge off policy governs when the account must be charged off. For more information on our charge off policy, see Note 2 of the accompanying audited consolidated financial statements. |
In connection with any bankruptcy court initiated repayment plan, the Company effectively resets the delinquency rating of each account to coincide with the court initiated repayment plan. Effectively, the accounts delinquency rating is changed thereafter under normal grading parameters. The following table shows the number of loans in bankruptcy in which the delinquency rating was reset to coincide with a court initiated repayment plan. |
2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | |
Number of Bankrupt Delinquency Resets | 1,601 | 2,022 | 2,224 | 1,936 | 1,882 |
Beginning January 1, 2010, the Company also began tracking the dollar amount of loans in bankruptcy in which the delinquency rating was reset. During 2011 and 2010, the Company reset the delinquency rating to coincide with court initiated repayment plans on bankrupt accounts with principal balances totaling $5.3 million and $5.9 million, respectively. This represented approximately 1.37% and 1.64% of the average principal loan portfolio outstanding during 2011 and 2010, respectively. The following table shows the amount of certain classifications of delinquencies and the ratio of such delinquencies to related outstanding loans: |
| As of December 31 | ||||||
| 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | ||
| (in thousands, except % data) |
8
LOSS EXPERIENCE |
|
Net losses (charge-offs less recoveries) and the percent of such net losses to average net loans (loans less unearned finance charges) and to liquidations (loan payments, refunds on unearned finance charges, renewals and charge-offs of customers' loans) are shown in the following table: |
|
|
| Year Ended December 31 | ||||||
|
|
| 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | ||
|
|
| (in thousands, except % data) |
| DIRECT CASH LOANS | ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average Net Loans | $ 305,152 | $ 282,750 | $ 274,275 | $ 266,753 | $ 242,576 |
Liquidations | $520,997 | $465,584 | $435,146 | $432,651 | $ 405,782 |
Net Losses | $ 21,014 | $ 22,479 | $ 24,415 | $ 21,325 | $ 17,812 |
Net Losses as % of Average Net Loans | 6.89% | 7.95% | 8.90% | 7.99% | 7.34% |
Net Losses as % of Liquidations | 4.03% | 4.83% | 5.61% | 4.93% | 4.39% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| REAL ESTATE LOANS | ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average Net Loans | $ 22,253 | $ 23,351 | $ 24,042 | $ 25,451 | $ 25,015 |
Liquidations | $ 9,854 | $ 9,798 | $ 8,543 | $ 15,324 | $ 13,436 |
Net Losses (Recoveries) | $ 75 | $ 117 | $ 84 | $ (23) | $ 114 |
Net Losses (Recoveries) as a % of Average Net Loans | .34% | .50% | .35% | (.09%) | .46% |
Net Losses (Recoveries) as a % of Liquidations | .76% | 1.19% | .98% | (.15%) | .85% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| SALES FINANCE CONTRACTS | ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average Net Loans | $ 17,863 | $ 19,369 | $ 21,334 | $ 25,486 | $ 28,721 |
Liquidations | $ 27,211 | $ 27,642 | $ 28,304 | $ 35,070 | $ 42,031 |
Net Losses | $ 670 | $ 811 | $ 1,203 | $ 1,448 | $ 1,557 |
Net Losses as % of Average Net Loans | 3.75% | 4.19% | 5.64% | 5.68% | 5.42% |
Net Losses as % of Liquidations | 2.46% | 2.93% | 4.25% | 4.13% | 3.70% |
ALLOWANCE FOR LOAN LOSSES |
|
|
We determine the allowance for loan losses by reviewing our previous loss experience, reviewing specifically identified loans where collection is believed to be doubtful and evaluating the inherent risks and changes in the composition of our loan portfolio. Such allowance is, in our opinion, sufficient to provide adequate protection against probable loan losses in the current loan portfolio. For additional information about Managements approach to estimating and evaluating the allowance for loan losses, see Note 2 Loans in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements. |
9
|
SEGMENT FINANCIAL INFORMATION |
|
For additional financial information about our segments, see Note 13 Segment Financial Information in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. |
|
CREDIT INSURANCE |
|
We offer optional credit insurance coverage to our customers when making a loan. Such coverage may include credit life insurance, credit accident and health insurance and/or credit property insurance. Customers may request credit life insurance coverage to help assure any outstanding loan balance is repaid if the customer dies before the loan is repaid or they may request credit accident and health insurance coverage to help continue loan payments if the customer becomes sick or disabled for an extended period of time. Customers may also choose property insurance coverage to protect the value of loan collateral against damage, theft or destruction. We write these various insurance products as an agent for a non-affiliated insurance company. Under various agreements, our wholly-owned insurance subsidiaries, Frandisco Life Insurance Company and Frandisco Property and Casualty Insurance Company, reinsure the insurance coverage on our customers written on behalf of this non-affiliated insurance company. |
|
REGULATION AND SUPERVISION |
|
In some jurisdictions, we are deemed to operate as a small loan business. Generally, state laws require that each office in which a small loan business is conducted be licensed by the state and that the business be conducted according to the applicable statutes and regulations. The granting of a license depends on the financial responsibility, character and fitness of the applicant, and, where applicable, the applicant must show evidence of a need through convenience and advantage documentation. As a condition to obtaining such license, the applicant must consent to state regulation and examination and to the making of periodic reports to the appropriate governing agencies. Licenses are revocable for cause, and their continuance depends upon an applicants continued compliance with applicable laws and in connection with its receipt of a license. We believe we conduct our business in accordance with all applicable statutes and regulations. The Company has never had any of its licenses revoked. |
|
We conduct all of our lending operations under the provisions of the Federal Consumer Credit Protection Act (the "Truth-in-Lending Act"), the Fair Credit Reporting Act and the Federal Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act and other federal and state lending laws. The Truth-in-Lending Act requires us, among other things, to disclose to our customers the finance charge, the annual percentage rate, the total number and amount of payments and other material information on all loans. |
|
A Federal Trade Commission ruling prevents consumer lenders such as the Company from using certain household goods as collateral on direct cash loans. As a result, we seek to collateralize such loans with non-household goods such as automobiles, boats and other exempt items. |
|
We are also subject to state regulations governing insurance agents in the states in which we sell credit insurance. State insurance regulations require, among other things, that insurance agents be licensed and limit the premiums that insurance agents can charge. |
|
Changes in the current regulatory environment, or the interpretation or application of current regulations, could impact our business. While we believe that we are currently in compliance with all regulatory requirements, no assurance can be made regarding our future compliance or the cost thereof. |
10
SOURCES OF FUNDS AND COMMON STOCK MATTERS |
|
The Company is dependent upon the availability of funds from various sources in order to meet its ongoing financial obligations and to make new loans as a part of its business. Our various sources of funds as a percent of total liabilities and stockholders equity and the number of persons investing in the Company's debt securities was as follows: |
| As of December 31 | ||||
| 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 |
Bank Borrowings | --% | --% | 4% | 6% | 4% |
Senior Debt | 53 | 49 | 43 | 38 | 41 |
Subordinated Debt | 10 | 14 | 19 | 22 | 23 |
Other Liabilities | 4 | 5 | 4 | 4 | 5 |
Stockholders Equity | 33 | 32 | 30 | 30 | 27 |
Total | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Investors | 5,406 | 5,418 | 5,406 | 5,508 | 5,820 |
The average interest rates we pay on borrowings, computed by dividing the interest paid by the average indebtedness outstanding, have been as follows: |
| Year Ended December 31 | |||||
| 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 |
Senior Borrowings | 4.08% | 4.52% | 4.93% | 4.78% | 5.81% |
Subordinated Borrowings | 4.20 | 5.33 | 5.89 | 6.27 | 6.34 |
All Borrowings | 4.11 | 4.74 | 5.24 | 5.33 | 5.98 |
Certain financial ratios relating to our debt have been as follows: |
| As of December 31 | ||||||
| 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 |
Total Liabilities to |
|
|
|
|
| |
Stockholders Equity | 2.03 | 2.18 | 2.38 | 2.66 | 2.18 | |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Unsubordinated Debt to |
|
|
|
|
| |
Subordinated Debt plus |
|
|
|
|
| |
Stockholders Equity | 1.32 | 1.19 | 1.06 | .99 | 1.19 | |
As of March 29, 2012, all of our common stock was closely held by five related individuals and none of our common stock was listed on any securities exchange or traded on any established public trading market. The Company does not maintain any equity compensation plans, and did not repurchase any of its equity securities during the most recent fiscal year. Cash distributions of $51.97 and $29.07 per share were paid in 2011 and 2010, respectively, primarily in amounts to enable the Companys shareholders to pay their related income tax obligations which arise as a result of the Companys status as an S Corporation. No other cash dividends were paid during the applicable periods. For the foreseeable future, the Company expects to pay annual cash distributions equal to an amount sufficient to enable the Companys shareholders to pay their respective income tax obligations as a result of the Companys status as an S Corporation. |
11
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS |
|
Managements Discussion and Analysis provides a narrative of the Companys financial condition and performance. The narrative reviews the Companys results of operations, liquidity and capital resources, critical accounting policies and estimates, and certain other matters. It includes Managements interpretation of our financial results, the factors affecting these results and the significant factors that we currently believe may materially affect our future financial condition, operating results and liquidity. This discussion should be read in conjunction with the Companys consolidated financial statements and notes thereto contained elsewhere in this Annual Report. |
|
Our significant accounting policies are disclosed in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements. Certain information in this discussion and other statements contained in this Annual Report which are not historical facts are forward-looking statements within the meaning of the federal securities laws. These forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties. Actual results, performance or achievements could differ materially from those contemplated, expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements contained herein. Possible factors which could cause our actual future results to differ from any expectations within any forward-looking statements, or otherwise, include, but are not limited to, our ability to manage liquidity and cash flow, the accuracy of Managements estimates and judgments, adverse economic conditions including the interest rate environment, unforeseen changes in net interest margin, federal and state regulatory changes, unfavorable outcomes of litigation and other factors referenced in the Risk Factors section of the Companys Annual Report and elsewhere herein, or otherwise contained in our filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission from time to time. |
General: |
The Company is a privately-held corporation that has been engaged in the consumer finance industry since 1941. Our operations focus primarily on making installment loans to individuals in relatively small amounts for short periods of time. Other lending-related activities include the purchase of sales finance contracts from various dealers and the making of first and second mortgage real estate loans. All our loans are at fixed rates, and contain fixed terms and fixed payments. We operate branch offices in six southeastern states and had a total of 258 branch locations at December 31, 2011. The Company and its operations are guided by a strategic plan which includes planned growth through expansion of our branch office network. The Company expanded its operations with the opening of six new branch offices during the year just ended. The majority of our revenues are derived from finance charges earned on loans outstanding. Additional revenues are derived from earnings on investment securities, insurance income and other miscellaneous income. |
|
Financial Condition:
|
The Companys consolidated statement of financial position at December 31, 2011 reflects an increase of $42.8 million (10%) in total assets to $464.9 million compared to $422.1 million at December 31, 2010. Our growth was primarily driven by increases in our loan and investment portfolios. Loan originations were $584.1 million during 2011 compared to $520.3 million during 2010 representing an increase of $65.7 million or 13%. As a result of the increase in loan originations, we ended 2011 with a net loan portfolio, net of the allowance for loan losses, of $318.0 million compared to $295.0 million at December 31, 2010. In addition to the increase in loan originations, a $2.7 million reduction in our allowance for loan losses also contributed to the increase in our net loan portfolio during 2011. Our allowance for loan losses reflects Managements estimate of the level of allowance adequate to cover probable losses inherent in our loan portfolio as of the date of the consolidated statement of financial position. To evaluate the overall adequacy of our allowance for loan losses, we consider the level of loan receivables, historical loss trends, loan delinquency trends, bankruptcy trends and overall economic conditions. As a result of an overall improvement in the credit quality of the Companys loan portfolio, Management lowered the allowance for loan losses at December 31, 2011 compared to December 31, 2010. Management believes the allowance for loan losses, although lowered in 2011, continued to be adequate to cover probable losses; however, changes in trends or deterioration in economic conditions could result in a change in the allowance. Any increase could have a material adverse impact on our results of operation or financial condition in the future. |
|
An increase in investing activity by the Companys insurance subsidiaries resulted in a $29.5 million increase (38%) increase in our investment portfolio at December 31, 2011 compared to the prior year end. The increase in investing activity was due to Managements effort to transfer surplus funds generated from our insurance subsidiaries during the current year and funds previously held in short-term investments into higher yielding instruments. Short-term investments declined $19.8 million (73%) as a result of the transfer of funds into our investment securities portfolio. Management maintains what it believes to be a conservative approach when formulating its investment strategy. The Company does not participate in hedging programs, interest rate swaps or other activities involving the use of off-balance sheet derivative financial instruments. The Companys investment portfolio consists mainly of U.S. Treasury bonds, government agency bonds and various municipal bonds. Approximately 66% of these investment securities have been designated as available for sale with any unrealized gain or loss accounted for in the equity section of the Companys consolidated statement of financial position, net of deferred income taxes for those investments held by the insurance subsidiaries. The remainder of the investment portfolio represents securities that are designated held to maturity, as Management has both the ability and intent to hold these securities to maturity, and are carried at amortized cost. Cash and cash equivalents decreased $14.4 million (47%) at December 31, 2011 compared to December 31, 2010. Funding associated with the increase in our loan portfolio and the aforementioned transfer of surplus funds into investment securities were the primary factors causing the decline.
Other assets increased $2.9 million (20%) at December 31, 2011 compared to the prior year end mainly due to an increase in fixed assets. The Company purchased approximately 1,100 new computer workstations and over 300 new printers to replace aging equipment in its branch operations. The new equipment will be depreciated over a four year period. |
|
Senior debt outstanding at December 31, 2011 amounted to $243.8 million compared to $208.5 million at December 31, 2010, representing a $35.3 million (17%) increase. The increase was mainly due to an increase in sales of certain of the Companys short-term investment securities. Offsetting a portion of the increase was a $.9 million reduction in outstanding borrowings against the Companys credit line. |
|
The Companys subordinated debt decreased $12.9 million, or 22%, at December 31, 2011 compared to the prior year end as a result of redemptions of such securities by investors under the provisions of these securities. Due to the low interest rate environment, many of the Companys investors are opting for the Companys shorter term senior debt. |
|
As a result of the aforementioned decline in subordinated debt, accrued interest payable thereon was lower at the end 2011. Accounts payable and accrued expenses decreased $.5 million (2%) at December 31, 2011 compared to the prior year end mainly due to the lower accrued interest. |
|
Results of Operations: |
|
The year ended December 31, 2011 marked the Companys seventieth year in existence and results of operations were the most successful in its history. Total revenues reached a record $157.9 million during 2011 compared to $145.5 million during 2010. Net income earned was $29.1 million and $20.7 million during the same comparable periods, respectively. The 2011 increase in revenue and net income was mainly due to higher finance charge earnings and insurance earnings. Lower borrowing costs and credit losses during the current year also contributed to the increase in net income. |
|
Net Interest Income: |
|
A principal component impacting the Companys operating performance is its net interest income. It represents the difference between income on earning assets (loans and investments) and the cost of funds on interest bearing liabilities. The primary categories of our earning assets are loans and investments. Bank borrowings and debt securities represent a majority of our interest bearing liabilities. Factors affecting our net interest margin include the level of average net receivables and the interest income associated therewith, capitalized loan origination costs and our average outstanding debt, as well as the general interest rate environment. Volatility in interest rates generally has more impact on the income earned on investments and the Companys borrowing costs than on interest income earned on loans. Management does not normally change the rates charged on loans originated solely as a result of changes in the interest rate environment. |
|
Our net interest income increased to $100.1 million during 2011 compared to $90.7 million during 2010 and $85.7 million during 2009. Higher levels of average net receivables outstanding during 2011 and 2010 resulted in increases in interest income. Interest income grew $8.6 million (8%) during 2011 compared to 2010, and $3.8 million (4%) during 2010 compared to 2009. |
Historical low interest rates have also had a favorable impact on our net interest income. Although average borrowings were $284.8 million during 2011 compared to $257.8 during 2010 and $253.3 during 2009, interest expense declined. During 2011, our weighted average borrowing rates declined to 4.09% compared to 4.74% during the prior year. As a result of the lower rates, interest expense decreased $.8 million during 2011 compared to 2010 and $1.2 million during 2010 compared to 2009. |
|
Net Insurance Income: |
|
The aforementioned increase in average net receivables during the two year period ended December 31, 2011 also led to increases in our net insurance income. The Company offers certain optional credit insurance products to loan customers. Growth in our loan portfolio typically leads to increases in insurance in-force as many loan customers elect to purchase the credit insurance coverage offered by the Company. Net insurance income increased $2.4 million and $1.2 million during 2011 and 2010, respectively. A reduction in insurance claims expense also contributed to the increase during 2010. |
Other Revenue: |
|
The Company, as an agent for a third party, offers auto club memberships to loan customers during the closing of a loan. The primary revenue category included in other revenue relates to commissions earned by the Company on sales of the auto club memberships. Higher sales during 2011 and 2010 resulted in the other revenue increasing $.9 million and $.7 million, respectively. |
Provision for Loan Losses: |
|
The Companys provision for loan losses represents net charge offs and adjustments to the allowance for loan losses to cover credit losses inherent in the outstanding loan portfolio at the balance sheet date. Determining the proper allowance for loan losses is a critical accounting estimate which involves Managements judgment with respect to certain relevant factors, such as historical and expected loss trends, unemployment rates in various locales, current and expected net charge offs, delinquency levels, bankruptcy trends and overall general economic conditions. See Note 2, Loans, in the accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional discussion regarding the allowance for loan losses. |
|
Our provision for loan losses declined $1.9 million (9%) and $8.4 million (29%) during 2011 and 2010, respectively. Lower levels of net charge offs and a reduction in our allowance for loan losses during the two respective years led to the decline in our loss provision. Net charge offs during 2011 were $21.8 million compared to $23.4 million during 2010 and $25.7 million during 2009. Management reduced the allowance for loan losses during 2011 and 2010 by $2.7 million and $2.5 million, respectively. The decision to lower the allowance for loan losses was based on favorable trends in the various relevant factors described previously in this report. |
|
We believe that the allowance for loan losses is adequate to cover probable losses inherent in our portfolio; however, because the allowance for loan losses is based on estimates, there can be no assurance that the ultimate charge off amount will not exceed such estimates or that our loss assumptions will not increase. |
|
15
| Expected Year of Maturity | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| 2017 & |
| Fair | |||||
| 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | Beyond | Total | Value | |||||
Assets: | (in millions) | ||||||||||||
Marketable Debt Securities | $ 9 | $ 13 | $ 13 | $ 10 | $ 10 | $ 52 | $107 | $107 | |||||
Average Interest Rate | 3.5% | 3.4% | 2.6% | 3.2% | 3.3% | 2.5% | 3.4% |
| |||||
Liabilities: |
| ||||||||||||
Senior Debt: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Senior Demand Notes | $47 | | | | | | $ 47 | $ 47 | |||||
Average Interest Rate | 2.1% | | | | | | 2.1% |
| |||||
Commercial Paper | $197 | | | | | | $197 | $197 | |||||
Average Interest Rate | 4.0% | | | | | | 4.0% |
| |||||
Subordinated Debentures | $ 9 | $ 10 | $ 12 | $ 16 | | | $ 47 | $ 47 | |||||
Average Interest Rate | 3.4% | 3.7% | 3.3% | 3.1% | | | 3.5% |
|
| Payment due by period | ||||||
Contractual Obligations | Total | Less Than 1 Year | 1 to 2 Years | 3 to 5 Years | More than 5 Years | ||
(in millions) | |||||||
Bank Commitment Fee ** | $ 1.5 | $ .6 | $ .5 | $ .4 | $ - | ||
Senior Demand Notes * | 47.6 | 47.6 | - | - | - | ||
Commercial Paper * | 204.5 | 204.5 | - | - | - | ||
Subordinated Debt * | 53.4 | 10.7 | 11.2 | 31.5 | - | ||
Human resource insurance and support contracts ** | .6 | .6 | - | - | - | ||
Operating leases (offices) | 13.3 | 4.7 | 3.7 | 4.9 | - | ||
Communication lines contract ** | 4.1 | 2.7 | 1.4 | - | - | ||
Software service contract ** | 22.1 | 2.8 | 2.8 | 8.5 | 8.0 | ||
Total | $347.1 | $274.2 | $19.6 | $45.3 | $ 8.0 | ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
* Includes estimated interest at current rates. |
|
|
| ||||
** Based on current usage. |
|
|
|
|
|
Critical Accounting Policies: |
|
The accounting and reporting policies of 1st Franklin and its subsidiaries are in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States and conform to general practices within the financial services industry. The more critical accounting and reporting policies include the allowance for loan losses, revenue recognition and insurance claims reserves. |
Allowance for Loan Losses: Provision for loan losses are charged to operations in amounts sufficient to maintain the allowance for loan losses at a level considered adequate to cover probable losses inherent in our loan portfolio. The allowance for loan losses is established based on the estimate of the amount of probable losses inherent in the loan portfolio as of the reporting date. We review charge off experience factors, delinquency reports, historical collection rates, estimates of the value of the underlying collateral, economic trends such as unemployment rates and bankruptcy filings and other information in order to make the necessary judgments as to probable losses. Assumptions regarding probable losses are reviewed periodically and may be impacted by our actual loss experience and changes in any of the factors discussed above. |
Revenue Recognition: Accounting principles generally accepted in the United States require that an interest yield method be used to calculate the income recognized on accounts which have precomputed charges. An interest yield method is used by the Company on each individual account with precomputed charges to calculate income for those on-going accounts; however, state regulations often allow interest refunds to be made according to the Rule of 78s method for payoffs and renewals. Since the majority of the Company's accounts which have precomputed charges are paid off or renewed prior to maturity, the result is that most of the those accounts effectively yield on a Rule of 78s basis. |
|
Precomputed finance charges are included in the gross amount of certain direct cash loans, sales finance contracts and certain real estate loans. These precomputed charges are deferred and recognized as income on an accrual basis using the effective interest method. Some other cash loans and real estate loans, which do not have precomputed charges, have income recognized on a simple interest accrual basis. Income is not accrued on a loan that is more than 60 days past due. |
|
Loan fees and origination costs are deferred and recognized as an adjustment to the loan yield over the contractual life of the related loan. |
|
The property and casualty credit insurance policies written by the Company, as agent for a non-affiliated insurance company, are reinsured by the Companys property and casualty insurance subsidiary. The premiums are deferred and earned over the period of insurance coverage using the pro-rata method or the effective yield method, depending on whether the amount of insurance coverage generally remains level or declines. |
|
The credit life and accident and health policies written by the Company, as agent for a non-affiliated insurance company, are also reinsured by the Companys life insurance subsidiary. The premiums are deferred and earned using the pro-rata method for level-term life policies and the effective yield method for decreasing-term life policies. Premiums on accident and health policies are earned based on an average of the pro-rata method and the effective yield method. |
|
Insurance Claims Reserves: Included in unearned insurance premiums and commissions on the consolidated statements of financial position are reserves for incurred but unpaid credit insurance claims for policies written by the Company and reinsured by the Companys wholly-owned insurance subsidiaries. These reserves are established based on accepted actuarial methods. In the event that the Companys actual reported losses for any given period are materially in excess of the previously estimated amounts, such losses could have a material adverse effect on the Companys results of operations. |
|
Different assumptions in the application of these policies could result in material changes in the Companys consolidated financial position or consolidated results of operations. |
|
New Accounting Pronouncements: |
|
See Note 1, Recent Accounting Pronouncements, in the accompanying Notes to |
21
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM |
|
To: The Board of Directors and Shareholders |
1st Franklin Financial Corporation |
|
We have audited the accompanying consolidated statements of financial position of 1st Franklin Financial Corporation and subsidiaries (the "Company") as of December 31, 2011 and 2010, and the related consolidated statements of income, stockholders' equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2011. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits. |
|
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion. |
|
In our opinion, such consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of 1st Franklin Financial Corporation and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2011 and 2010, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2011, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. |
|
/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP |
|
Atlanta, Georgia |
March 29, 2012 |
22
1st FRANKLIN FINANCIAL CORPORATION |
|
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF FINANCIAL POSITION |
|
DECEMBER 31, 2011 AND 2010 |
|
ASSETS |
|
|
| 2011 | 2010 |
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS (Note 5): |
|
| |
Cash and Due From Banks | $ 9,130,030 | $ 3,635,920 | |
Short-term Investments | 7,221,111 | 27,065,494 | |
| 16,351,141 | 30,701,414 | |
|
|
| |
RESTRICTED CASH (Note 1) | 5,568,529 | 3,778,734 | |
|
|
| |
LOANS (Note 2): |
|
| |
Direct Cash Loans | 376,568,048 | 347,445,192 | |
Real Estate Loans | 22,123,077 | 22,967,279 | |
Sales Finance Contracts | 19,764,821 | 21,694,633 | |
|
418,455,946 |
392,107,104 | |
|
|
| |
Less: | Unearned Finance Charges | 49,206,783 | 45,811,133 |
| Unearned Insurance Premiums | 29,929,658 | 27,211,693 |
| Allowance for Loan Losses | 21,360,085 | 24,110,085 |
|
| 317,959,420 | 294,974,193 |
|
|
| |
MARKETABLE DEBT SECURITIES (Note 3): |
|
| |
Available for Sale, at fair value | 70,882,334 | 66,310,922 | |
Held to Maturity, at amortized cost | 36,780,206 | 11,890,954 | |
| 107,662,540 | 78,201,876 | |
|
|
| |
OTHER ASSETS: |
|
| |
Land, Buildings, Equipment and Leasehold Improvements, |
|
| |
less accumulated depreciation and amortization |
|
| |
of $17,608,651 and $17,364,987 in 2011 and 2010, respectively | 9,342,174 | 6,687,456 | |
Deferred Acquisition Costs | 1,718,297 | 1,563,629 | |
Due from Non-affiliated Insurance Company | 2,246,092 | 1,903,137 | |
Miscellaneous | 4,036,392 | 4,253,457 | |
| 17,342,955 | 14,407,679 | |
|
|
| |
TOTAL ASSETS | $ 464,884,585 | $ 422,063,896 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements |
23
1st FRANKLIN FINANCIAL CORPORATION |
|
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF FINANCIAL POSITION |
|
DECEMBER 31, 2011 AND 2010 |
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY |
| 2011 | 2010 |
SENIOR DEBT (Note 6): |
|
|
Note Payable to Banks | $ -- | $ 900,000 |
Senior Demand Notes, including accrued interest | 46,606,960 | 40,392,404 |
Commercial Paper | 197,194,186 | 167,199,875 |
| 243,801,146 | 208,492,279 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE AND ACCRUED EXPENSES | 20,628,730 | 21,081,545 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
SUBORDINATED DEBT (Note 7) | 46,870,076 | 59,779,620 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Liabilities | 311,299,952 | 289,353,444 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (Note 8) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY: |
|
|
Preferred Stock; $100 par value |
|
|
6,000 shares authorized; no shares outstanding | -- | -- |
Common Stock: |
|
|
Voting Shares; $100 par value; |
|
|
2,000 shares authorized; 1,700 shares outstanding as of December 31, 2011 and 2010 | 170,000 | 170,000 |
Non-Voting Shares; no par value; |
|
|
198,000 shares authorized; 168,300 shares |
|
|
outstanding as of December 31, 2011 and 2010 | -- | -- |
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income | 2,136,739 | 1,550,273 |
Retained Earnings | 151,277,894 | 130,990,179 |
Total Stockholders' Equity | 153,584,633 | 132,710,452 |
|
|
|
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY | $ 464,884,585
| $ 422,063,896
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements |
24
1st FRANKLIN FINANCIAL CORPORATION | ||||
| ||||
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME | ||||
| ||||
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2011, 2010 AND 2009 | ||||
| ||||
|
|
|
| |
| 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | |
INTEREST INCOME: Finance Charges Net Investment Income | $ 108,858,812 2,871,386 111,730,198 | $ 100,475,533 2,674,611 103,150,144 | $ 96,494,760 2,842,125 99,336,885 | |
INTEREST EXPENSE: Senior Debt Subordinated Debt | 9,323,864 2,316,933 11,640,797 | 8,583,664 3,855,020 12,438,684 | 8,745,154 4,936,793 13,681,947 | |
|
|
|
| |
NET INTEREST INCOME | 100,089,401 | 90,711,460 | 85,654,938 | |
|
|
|
| |
PROVISION FOR LOAN LOSSES (Note 2) | 19,008,749 | 20,907,373 | 29,302,142 | |
|
|
|
| |
NET INTEREST INCOME AFTER PROVISION FOR LOAN LOSSES | 81,080,652 | 69,804,087 | 56,352,796 | |
|
|
|
| |
NET INSURANCE INCOME: Premiums Insurance Claims and Expense | 39,439,993 (8,940,319) 30,499,674 | 36,521,076 (8,466,903) 28,054,173 | 35,375,453 (8,565,929) 26,809,524 | |
|
|
|
| |
OTHER REVENUE | 6,723,655 | 5,789,444 | 5,133,530 | |
|
|
|
| |
OPERATING EXPENSES: Personnel Expense Occupancy Expense Other Expense | 55,399,302 11,455,842 19,219,788 86,074,932 | 51,566,673 10,752,842 17,905,308 80,224,823 | 48,366,010 11,187,160 17,692,331 77,245,501 | |
|
|
|
| |
INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAXES | 32,229,049 | 23,422,881 | 11,050,349 | |
|
|
|
| |
PROVISION FOR INCOME TAXES (Note 11)
| 3,105,931 | 2,739,444 | 2,677,342 | |
|
|
|
| |
NET INCOME | $ 29,123,118 | $ 20,683,437 | $ 8,373,007 | |
|
|
|
| |
BASIC EARNINGS PER SHARE: 170,000 Shares Outstanding for All Periods (1,700 voting, 168,300 non-voting) | $171.31 | $121.67 | $49.25 | |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements |
25
1st FRANKLIN FINANCIAL CORPORATION |
|
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2011, 2010 AND 2009 |
|
|
|
| Accumulated |
| |
|
|
|
| Other |
| |
| Common Stock |
| Retained | Comprehensive |
| |
| Shares | Amount | Earnings | Income | Total |
Balance at December 31, 2008 | 170,000 | $170,000 | $115,633,371 | $ 433,101 | $116,236,472 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive Income: |
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income for 2009 | | | 8,373,007 | |
|
Net Change in Unrealized Gain On Available-For-Sale Securities | | |
| 1,263,744 |
|
Total Comprehensive Income | | | | | 9,636,751 |
Cash Distributions Paid | | | (8,758,311) | | (8,758,311) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2009 | 170,000 | 170,000 | 115,248,067 | 1,696,845 | 117,114,912 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive Income: |
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income for 2010 | | | 20,683,437 | |
|
Net Change in Unrealized Gain On Available-For-Sale Securities | | | | (146,572) |
|
Total Comprehensive Income | | | | | 20,536,865 |
Cash Distributions Paid | | | (4,941,325) | | (4,941,325) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2010 | 170,000 | 170,000 | 130,990,179 | 1,550,273 | 132,710,452 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive Income: |
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income for 2011 | | | 29,123,118 | |
|
Net Change in Unrealized Gain On Available-For-Sale Securities | | | | 586,466 |
|
Total Comprehensive Income | | | | | 29,709,584 |
Cash Distributions Paid | | | (8,835,403) | | (8,835,403) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2011 | 170,000 | $170,000 | $151,277,894 | $2,136,739 | $153,584,633 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Disclosure of reclassification amount: |
| 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized holding gains (losses) arising during period, net of applicable income tax benefits (provision) of $(260,943) $55,313 and $(368,964) for 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively |
|
|
| ||
$ 597,641 | $ (142,840) |
$ 1,267,302 | |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: Reclassification adjustment for net gains included in income, net of applicable income taxes of $1,869, $1,381 and $1,201 for 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively | 11,175 | 3,732 | 3,558 | ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net unrealized gains (losses)on securities, net of applicable income tax benefits (provision) of $(259,074), $56,694 and $(367,763) for 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively | $ 586,466 | $ (146,572) | $ 1,263,744 |
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements |
|
26
1st FRANKLIN FINANCIAL CORPORATION |
|
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS |
|
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2011, 2010 AND 2009 |
| 2011 | 2010 | 2009 |
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net Income | $ 29,123,118 | $ 20,683,437 | $ 8,373,007 |
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net |
|
|
|
cash provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
Provision for loan losses | 19,008,749 | 20,907,373 | 29,302,142 |
Depreciation and amortization | 2,586,017 | 2,465,829 | 2,577,539 |
Provision for deferred taxes | 24,348 | 272,131 | 15,771 |
Losses due to called redemptions on marketable
securities, loss on sales of equipment and |
|
|
|
amortization on securities | 564,126 | 379,558 | 314,172 |
(Increase) decrease in miscellaneous assets and other | (280,623) | (1,008,646) | 198,125 |
(Decrease) increase in other liabilities | (736,171) | 3,288,604 | 285,329 |
Net Cash Provided | 50,289,564 | 46,988,286 | 41,066,085 |
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
Loans originated or purchased | (268,764,514) | (241,803,898) | (214,933,802) |
Loan payments | 226,770,538 | 205,015,783 | 192,118,149 |
Increase in restricted cash | (1,789,795) | (711,039) | (700,916) |
Purchases of securities, available for sale | (17,503,960) | (9,969,266) | (2,428,840) |
Purchases of securities, held to maturity | (28,785,585) | (4,659,094) | -- |
Sales of securities, available for sale | 2,267,712 | -- | -- |
Sales of securities, held to maturity | 817,615 | -- | -- |
Redemptions of securities, available for sale | 11,100,000 | 6,189,950 | 8,490,750 |
2,695,000 | 3,065,000 | 3,790,000 | |
Purchase of joint venture interest | -- | -- | (27,601) |
Capital expenditures | (5,565,398) | (1,430,092) | (997,083) |
Proceeds from sale of equipment | 554,630 | 130,350 | 53,331 |
Net Cash Used | (78,203,757) | (44,172,306) | (14,636,012) |
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in Senior Demand Notes | 6,214,556 | (816,695) | (132,740) |
Advances on credit line | 4,308,977 | 11,240,082 | 90,246,309 |
Payments on credit line | (5,208,977) | (26,544,391) | (96,309,681) |
Commercial Paper issued | 51,932,342 | 53,169,908 | 396,342,906 |
Commercial Paper redeemed | (21,938,031) | (15,405,476) | (372,970,262) |
Subordinated Debt issued | 10,518,270 | 12,182,268 | 11,623,006 |
Subordinated Debt redeemed | (23,427,814) | (27,286,627) | (23,344,036) |
Dividends / Distributions paid | (8,835,403) | (4,941,325) | (8,758,311) |
Net Cash Provided (Used) | 13,563,920 | 1,597,744 | (3,302,809) |
|
|
|
|
NET (DECREASE) INCREASE IN |
|
|
|
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS | (14,350,273) | 4,413,724 | 23,127,264 |
|
|
|
|
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, beginning | 30,701,414 | 26,287,690 | 3,160,426 |
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, ending | $ 16,351,141 | $ 30,701,414 | $ 26,287,690 |
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION: | |||||
| Interest | $ 11,710,584 | $ 12,519,354 | $ 13,607,180 | |
| Income Taxes | 3,082,000 | 2,488,000 | 2,663,225 | |
| Assets Assumed (Note 12) | -- | -- | 289,746 | |
|
|
|
|
| |
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements |
27
1st FRANKLIN FINANCIAL CORPORATION |
|
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS |
|
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2011, 2010 AND 2009 |
|
1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES |
|
Business: |
|
1st Franklin Financial Corporation (the "Company") is a consumer finance company which originates and services direct cash loans, real estate loans and sales finance contracts through 258 branch offices located throughout the southeastern United States. In addition to this business, the Company writes credit insurance when requested by its loan customers as an agent for a non-affiliated insurance company specializing in such insurance. Two of the Company's wholly owned subsidiaries, Frandisco Life Insurance Company and Frandisco Property and Casualty Insurance Company, reinsure the credit life, the credit accident and health and the credit property insurance so written. |
|
Basis of Consolidation: |
|
The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly owned subsidiaries. Inter-company accounts and transactions have been eliminated. |
|
Fair Values of Financial Instruments: |
|
The following methods and assumptions are used by the Company in estimating fair values for financial instruments: |
|
Cash and Cash Equivalents. Cash includes cash on hand and with banks. Cash equivalents are short-term highly liquid investments with original maturities of three months or less. The carrying value of cash and cash equivalents approximates fair value due to the relatively short period of time between the origination of the instruments and their expected realization. |
|
Loans. The fair value of the Company's direct cash loans and sales finance contracts approximate the carrying value since the estimated life, assuming prepayments, is short-term in nature. The fair value of the Company's real estate loans approximate the carrying value since the interest rate charged by the Company approximates market rates. |
|
Marketable Debt Securities. The fair value of marketable debt securities is based on quoted market prices. If a quoted market price is not available, fair value is estimated using market prices for similar securities. See Note 3 for the fair value of marketable debt securities and Note 4 for information related to how these securities are valued. |
|
Senior Debt. The carrying value of the Company's senior debt securities approximate fair value due to the relatively short period of time between the origination of the instruments and their expected payment. |
|
Subordinated Debt. The carrying value of the Company's subordinated debt approximates fair value due to the re-pricing frequency of the securities. |
|
Use of Estimates: |
|
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires Management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could vary from these estimates. |
28
|
Income Recognition: |
|
Accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America require that an interest yield method be used to calculate the income recognized on accounts which have precomputed charges. An interest yield method is used by the Company on each individual account with precomputed charges to calculate income for those on-going accounts, however, state regulations often allow interest refunds to be made according to the Rule of 78's method for payoffs and renewals. Since the majority of the Company's accounts with precomputed charges are paid off or renewed prior to maturity, the result is that most of the accounts with precomputed charges effectively yield on a Rule of 78's basis. |
|
Precomputed finance charges are included in the gross amount of certain direct cash loans, sales finance contracts and certain real estate loans. These precomputed charges are deferred and recognized as income on an accrual basis using the effective interest method. Some other cash loans and real estate loans, which do not have precomputed charges, have income recognized on a simple interest accrual basis. Any loan which becomes 60 days or more past due, based on original contractual term, is placed in a non-accrual status. When a loan is placed in non-accrual status, income accruals are discontinued. Accrued income prior to the date an account becomes 60 days or more past due is not reversed. Income on loans in non-accrual status is earned only if payments are received. A loan in nonaccrual status is restored to accrual status when it becomes less than 60 days past due. |
|
Loan fees and origination costs are deferred and recognized as an adjustment to the loan yield over the contractual life of the related loan. |
|
The property and casualty credit insurance policies written by the Company, as agent for an unrelated insurance company, are reinsured by the Companys property and casualty insurance subsidiary. The premiums are deferred and earned over the period of insurance coverage using the pro-rata method or the effective yield method, depending on whether the amount of insurance coverage generally remains level or declines. |
|
The credit life and accident and health policies written by the Company, as agent for an unrelated insurance company, are reinsured by the Companys life insurance subsidiary. The premiums are deferred and earned using the pro-rata method for level-term life policies and the effective yield method for decreasing-term life policies. Premiums on accident and health policies are earned based on an average of the pro-rata method and the effective yield method. |
|
Claims of the insurance subsidiaries are expensed as incurred and reserves are established for incurred but not reported (IBNR) claims. Reserves for claims totaled $1,324,591 and $1,253,688 at December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively, and are included in unearned insurance premiums on the statements of financial position. |
|
Policy acquisition costs of the insurance subsidiaries are deferred and amortized to expense over the life of the policies on the same methods used to recognize premium income. |
|
Commissions received from the sale of auto club memberships are earned at the time the membership is sold. The Company sells the memberships as an agent for a third party. The Company has no further obligations after the date of sale as all claims for benefits are paid and administered by the third party. |
|
Depreciation and Amortization: |
|
Office machines, equipment and Company automobiles are recorded at cost and depreciated on a straight-line basis over a period of three to ten years. Leasehold improvements are amortized on a straight-line basis over five years or less depending on the term of the applicable lease. Depreciation and amortization expense for each of the three years ended December 31, 2011 was $2,586,017, $2,465,829 and $2,577,539, respectively. |
|
Restricted Cash: |
|
At December 31, 2011 and 2010, the Company had cash of $5,568,529 and $3,778,734, respectively, held in restricted accounts at its insurance subsidiaries in order to comply with certain requirements imposed on insurance companies by the State of Georgia and to meet the reserve requirements of its reinsurance agreements. During 2011 and 2010, restricted cash also included escrow deposits held by the Company on behalf of certain mortgage real estate customers. |
29
Impairment of Long-Lived Assets: |
|
The Company annually evaluates whether events and circumstances have occurred or triggering events have occurred that indicate the carrying amount of property and equipment may warrant revision or may not be recoverable. When factors indicate that these long-lived assets should be evaluated for possible impairment, the Company assesses the recoverability by determining whether the carrying value of such long-lived assets will be recovered through the future undiscounted cash flows expected from use of the asset and its eventual disposition. Based on Managements evaluation, there has been no impairment of carrying value of the long-lived assets, including property and equipment at December 31, 2011 and 2010. |
Income Taxes: |
|
The Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) 740-10. FASB ASC 740-10 provides that a tax benefit from an uncertain tax position may be recognized when it is more likely than not that the position will be sustained upon examination, including resolutions of any related appeals or litigation processes, based on the technical merits. Income tax positions must meet a more-likely-than-not recognition threshold at the effective date to be recognized. FASB ASC 740-10 also provides guidance on measurement, de-recognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure and transition. At December 31, 2011, the Company had no uncertain tax positions. |
|
The Companys insurance subsidiaries are treated as taxable entities and income taxes are provided for where applicable (Note 11). No provision for income taxes has been made by the Company since it has elected to be treated as an S Corporation for income tax reporting purposes. However, the state of Louisiana does not recognize S Corporation status, and the Company has accrued amounts necessary to pay the required income taxes in such state. |
|
Collateral Held for Resale: |
|
When the Company takes possession of the collateral which secures a loan, the collateral is recorded at the lower of its estimated resale value or the loan balance. Any losses incurred at that time are charged against the Allowance for Loan Losses. |
Marketable Debt Securities: |
|
Management has designated a significant portion of the Companys marketable debt securities held in the Company's investment portfolio at December 31, 2011 and 2010 as being available-for-sale. This portion of the investment portfolio is reported at fair value with unrealized gains and losses excluded from earnings and reported, net of taxes, in accumulated other comprehensive income, which is a separate component of stockholders' equity. Gains and losses on sales of securities available-for-sale are determined based on the specific identification method. The remainder of the investment portfolio is carried at amortized cost and designated as held-to-maturity as Management has both the ability and intent to hold these securities to maturity. |
|
Earnings per Share Information: |
|
The Company has no contingently issuable common shares, thus basic and diluted per share amounts are the same. Recent Accounting Pronouncements: In September 2011, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2011-8, Intangibles Goodwill and Other, regarding the testing of goodwill for impairment. The guidance provides an entity the option to first perform a qualitative assessment to determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount. If an entity determines that this is the case, it is required to perform the currently prescribed two-step goodwill impairment test to identify potential goodwill impairment and measure the amount of goodwill impairment loss to be recognized if applicable. Based on the qualitative assessment, if a company determines that the fair value of a reporting unit is more than the carrying amount, the two-step goodwill impairment test is not required. The Company adopted this new guidance effective January 1, 2012. Management does not believe the adoption of the guidance will have a material impact on the Companys consolidated financial statements. |
In June 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-05, Presentation of Comprehensive Income. ASU 211-05 requires entities to present comprehensive income in one continuous statement or in two separate but consecutive statements presenting the components of net income and its total, the components of other comprehensive income and its total, and total comprehensive income. The guidance also requires that reclassification adjustments from other comprehensive income to net income be presented in both the components of net income and the components of comprehensive income. The ASU is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 31, 2011. The Company is currently assessing the impact of the guidance but does not believe that the adoption thereof will have a material impact on the consolidated financial statements. In May 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-04, Fair Value Measurements, Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in U.S. GAAP and International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS). The guidance was issued to provide a consistent definition of fair value and ensure that the fair value measurement and disclosure requirements are similar between GAAP and IFRS. The guidance changes certain fair value measurement principles and expands disclosure requirements, particularly for assets valued using Level 3 fair value measurements. The ASU is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 31, 2011. The Company is currently assessing the impact of the guidance but does not believe that the adoption thereof will have a material impact on the consolidated financial statements. In April 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-02, to clarify the guidance for troubled debt restructurings (TDRs). This ASU clarifies the guidance on a creditors evaluation of whether it has granted a concession and whether a debtor is experiencing financial difficulties, such as: · Creditors cannot assume that debt extensions at or above a borrowers original contractual rate do not constitute troubled debt restructurings; · If a borrower doesnt have access to funds at a market rate for debt with characteristics similar to the restructured debt, that may indicate that the creditor has granted a concession; and · A borrower that is not currently in default may still be considered to be experiencing financial difficulty when payment default is considered probable in the foreseeable future. The guidance was effective beginning with the Companys third quarter 2011 Form 10-Q and was applied retrospectively to restructurings occurring on or after January 1, 2011. The adoption of the required disclosures did not have a material impact on the Companys consolidated financial statements. See Note 2 for disclosure of TDRs. On July 21, 2010, the FASB issued 909009ASU 2010-20, which requires expanded disclosures related to the credit quality of finance receivables and loans. This disclosure was effective for the Company during the December 31, 2010 reporting period. FASB ASU 2010-20 also requires a roll-forward of the allowance for loan losses, additional activity based disclosures for both financing receivables, and the allowance for each reporting period and certain new disclosures about troubled debt restructuring, all of which would be effective for the Company during the March 31, 2011 reporting period. |
2. LOANS |
|
The Companys consumer loans are made to individuals in relatively small amounts for relatively short periods of time. First and second mortgage loans on real estate are made in larger amounts and for longer periods of time. The Company also purchases sales finance contracts from various dealers. All loans and sales contracts are held for investment. |
Contractual Maturities of Loans: |
|
An estimate of contractual maturities stated as a percentage of the loan balances based upon an analysis of the Company's portfolio as of December 31, 2011 is as follows: |
|
| Direct | Real | Sales | ||
| Due In | Cash | Estate | Finance | ||
| Calendar Year | Loans | Loans | Contracts | ||
| 2012 | 66.33% | 19.25% | 65.68% | ||
| 2013 | 27.92 | 17.73 | 26.25 | ||
| 2014 | 4.86 | 15.19 | 6.82 | ||
| 2015 | .66 | 11.82 | 1.10 | ||
| 2016 | .11 | 8.80 | .08 | ||
| 2017 & beyond | .12 | 27.21 | .07 | ||
|
| 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% |
31
Historically, a majority of the Company's loans have been renewed many months prior to their final contractual maturity dates, and the Company expects this trend to continue in the future. Accordingly, the above contractual maturities should not be regarded as a forecast of future cash collections. |
|
Cash Collections on Principal: |
|
During the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010, cash collections applied to the principal of loans totaled $226,751,572 and $205,015,783, respectively, and the ratios of these cash collections to average net receivables were 65.67% and 62.99%, respectively. |
Allowance for Loan Losses: The Allowance for Loan Losses is based on Management's evaluation of the inherent risks and changes in the composition of the Company's loan portfolio. Managements approach to estimating and evaluating the allowance for loan losses is on a total portfolio level based on historical loss trends, bankruptcy trends, the level of receivables at the statement of financial position date, payment patterns and economic conditions primarily including, but not limited to, unemployment levels and gasoline prices. Historical loss trends are tracked on an on going basis. The trend analysis includes statistical analysis of the correlation between loan date and charge off date, charge off statistics by the total loan portfolio, and charge off statistics by branch, division and state. If trends indicate credit losses are increasing or decreasing, Management will evaluate to ensure the allowance for loan losses remains at proper levels. Delinquency and bankruptcy filing trends are also tracked. If these trends indicate an adjustment to the allowance for loan losses is warranted, Management will make what it considers to be appropriate adjustments. The level of receivables at the statement of financial position date is reviewed and adjustments to the allowance for loan losses are made, if Management determines increases or decreases in the level of receivables warrants an adjustment. The Company uses monthly unemployment statistics, and various other monthly or periodic economic statistics, published by departments of the U.S. government and other economic statistics providers to determine the economic component of the allowance for loan losses. Such allowance is, in the opinion of Management, sufficiently adequate for probable losses in the current loan portfolio. As the estimates used in determining the allowance for loan losses are influenced by outside factors, such as consumer payment patterns and general economic conditions, there is uncertainty inherent in these estimates. Actual results could vary based on future changes in significant assumptions. |
Management does not disaggregate the Companys loan portfolio by loan category when evaluating loan performance. The total portfolio is evaluated for credit losses based on contractual delinquency, and other economic conditions. The Company classifies delinquent accounts at the end of each month according to the number of installments past due at that time, based on the then-existing terms of the contract. Accounts are classified in delinquency categories based on the number of days past due. When three installments are past due, we classify the account as being 60-89 days past due; when four or more installments are past due, we classify the account as being 90 days or more past due. When a loan becomes five installments past due, it is charged off unless Management directs that it be retained as an active loan. In making this charge off evaluation, Management considers factors such as pending insurance, bankruptcy status and/or other indicators of collectability. In connection with any bankruptcy court-initiated repayment plan and as allowed by state regulatory authorities, the Company effectively resets the delinquency rating of each account to coincide with the court initiated repayment plan. In addition, no installment is counted as being past due if at least 80% of the contractual payment has been paid. The amount charged off is the unpaid balance less the unearned finance charges and the unearned insurance premiums, if applicable. |
When a loan becomes 60 days or more past due based on its original terms, it is placed in nonaccrual status. At this time, the accrual of any additional finance charges is discontinued. Finance charges are then only recognized to the extent there is a loan payment received or until the account qualifies for return to accrual status. Nonaccrual loans return to accrual status when the loan becomes less than 60 days past due. There were no loans past due 60 days or more and still accruing interest at December 31, 2011. The Companys principal balances on non-accrual loans by loan class at December 31, 2011 and 2010 are as follows: |
Loan Class | December 31, 2011 | December 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
Consumer Loans | $ 28,122,772 | $ 27,643,405 |
Real Estate Loans | 1,086,580 | 1,274,025 |
Sales Finance Contracts | 981,321 | 1,331,137 |
Total | $ 30,190,673 | $ 30,248,567 |
32
An age analysis of principal balances past due, segregated by loan class, as of December 31, 2011 and 2010 is as follows:
December 31, 2011 | 30-59 Days Past Due | 60-89 Days Past Due | 90 Days or More Past Due | Total Past Due Loans |
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer Loans | $ 9,981,262 | $ 5,711,530 | $ 11,911,170 | $ 27,603,962 |
Real Estate Loans | 455,781 | 114,885 | 655,667 | 1,226,333 |
Sales Finance Contracts | 370,283 | 204,383 | 492,427 | 1,067,093 |
Total | $ 10,807,326 | $ 6,030,798 | $ 13,059,264 | $ 29,897,388 |
December 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer Loans | $ 10,507,984 | $ 5,765,462 | $ 12,596,092 | $ 28,869,538 |
Real Estate Loans | 563,681 | 267,090 | 561,326 | 1,392,097 |
Sales Finance Contracts | 507,723 | 265,857 | 644,219 | 1,417,799 |
Total | $ 11,579,388 | $ 6,298,409 | $ 13,801,637 | $ 31,679,434 |
In addition to the delinquency rating analysis, the ratio of bankrupt accounts to our total loan portfolio is also used as a credit quality indicator. The ratio of bankrupt accounts to total principal loan balances outstanding at December 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010 was 2.78% and 3.05%, respectively.
Nearly our entire loan portfolio consists of small homogeneous consumer loans (of the product types set forth in the table below).
December 31, 2011 | Principal Balance | % Portfolio | Net Charge Offs | % Net Charge Offs |
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer Loans | $ 373,198,985 | 89.9% | $ 21,013,407 | 96.6% |
Real Estate Loans | 21,782,247 | 5.3 | 75,400 | .4 |
Sales Finance Contracts | 19,739,191 | 4.8 | 669,942 | 3.0 |
Total | $ 414,720,423 | 100.0% | $ 21,758,749 | 100.0% |
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer Loans | $ 344,661,480 | 88.6% | $ 22,479,059 | 96.0% |
Real Estate Loans | 22,620,701 | 5.8 | 117,197 | .5 |
Sales Finance Contracts | 21,707,043 | 5.6 | 811,117 | 3.5 |
Total | $ 388,989,224 | 100.0% | $ 23,407,373 | 100.0% |
Sales finance contracts are similar to consumer loans in nature of loan product, terms, customer base to whom these products are marketed, factors contributing to risk of loss and historical payment performance, and together with consumer loans, represented approximately 94% of the Companys loan portfolio at both December 31, 2011 and 2010. As a result of these similarities, which have resulted in similar historical performance, consumer loans and sales finance contracts represent substantially all loan losses. Real estate loans and related losses have historically been insignificant, and, as a result, we do not stratify the loan portfolio for purposes of determining and evaluating our loan loss allowance. Due to the composition of the loan portfolio, the Company determines and monitors the allowance for loan losses on a collectively evaluated, single portfolio segment basis. Therefore, a roll forward of the allowance for loan loss activity at the portfolio segment level is the same as at the total portfolio level. We have not acquired any impaired loans with deteriorating quality during any period reported. The following table provides additional information on our allowance for loan losses based on a collective evaluation: | |||||
|
| 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | |
| Allowance For Credit Losses: |
|
|
| |
| Beginning Balance | $ 24,110,085 | $ 26,610,085 | $ 23,010,085 | |
| Provision for Loan Losses | 19,008,749 | 20,907,373 | 29,302,142 | |
| Charge-Offs | (29,848,682) | (30,586,363) | (32,519,500) | |
| Recoveries | 8,089,933 | 7,178,990 | 6,817,358 | |
| Ending Balance | $ 21,360,085 | $ 24,110,085 | $ 26,610,085 | |
|
|
|
|
| |
| Ending Balance; collectively evaluated for impairment | $ 21,360,085 | $ 24,110,085 | $ 26,610,085 | |
|
|
|
|
|
33
| 2011 | 2010 | 2009 |
Finance receivables: |
|
|
|
Ending Balance | $ 414,720,423 | $ 388,989,224 | $ 371,565,298 |
Ending Balance; collectively evaluated for impairment | $ 414,720,423 | $ 388,989,224 | $ 371,565,298 |
Troubled debt restructurings (TDRs) represent loans on which the original terms have been modified as a result of the following conditions: (i) the restructuring constitutes a concession and (ii) the borrower is experiencing financial difficulties. Loan modifications by the Company involve payment alterations, interest rate concessions and/ or reductions in the amount owed by the customer. The following table presents a summary of loans that were restructured during the year ended December 31, 2011.
TDRs that subsequently defaulted during the year ended December 31, 2011 are listed below.
| Number of Loans | Pre-Modification Recorded Investment |
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer Loans | 643 | $ 1,286,829 |
|
Real Estate Loans | 4 | 17,534 |
|
Sales Finance Contracts | 46 | 66,878 |
|
Total | 693 | $ 1,371,241 |
|
The level of TDRs, including those which have experienced a subsequent default, is considered in the determination of an appropriate level of allowance for loan losses.
3. MARKETABLE DEBT SECURITIES | ||||||
| ||||||
Debt securities available for sale are carried at estimated fair market value. The amortized cost and estimated fair values of these debt securities are as follows: | ||||||
|
| Amortized Cost | Gross Unrealized Gains | Gross Unrealized Losses | Estimated Fair Value | |
| December 31, 2011 |
|
|
|
| |
| Obligations of states and |
|
|
|
| |
| political subdivisions | $ 67,983,813 | $ 2,679,157 | $ (13,724) | $ 70,649,246 | |
| Corporate securities | 130,316 | 102,772 | -- | 233,088 | |
|
| $ 68,114,129 | $ 2,781,929 | $ (13,724) | $ 70,882,334 |
| December 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
| |
| Obligations of states and |
|
|
|
| |
| political subdivisions | $ 64,257,940 | $ 1,767,545 | $ (91,629) | $ 65,933,856 | |
| Corporate securities | 130,316 | 246,750 | -- | 377,066 | |
|
| $ 64,388,256 | $ 2,014,295 | $ (91,629) | $ 66,310,922 | |
Debt securities designated as "Held to Maturity" are carried at amortized cost based on Management's intent and ability to hold such securities to maturity. The amortized cost and estimated fair market values of these debt securities are as follows: |
34
| Amortized Cost | Gross Unrealized Gains | Gross Unrealized Losses | Estimated Fair Value |
December 31, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
Obligations of states and |
|
|
|
|
political subdivisions | $ 36,780,206 | $ 1,312,337 | $ (2,823) | $ 38,089,720 |
December 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
Obligations of states and |
|
|
|
|
political subdivisions | $ 11,890,954 | $ 196,898 | $ (70,260) | $ 12,017,592 |
The amortized cost and estimated fair values of marketable debt securities at December 31, 2011, by contractual maturity, are shown below: |
| Available for Sale | Held to Maturity | ||
|
| Estimated |
| Estimated |
| Amortized | Fair | Amortized | Fair |
| Cost | Value | Cost | Value |
|
|
|
|
|
Due in one year or less | $ 6,466,490 | $ 6,658,946 | $ 2,654,086 | $ 2,669,685 |
Due after one year through five years | 36,917,215 | 38,609,069 | 7,655,280 | 7,874,602 |
Due after five years through ten years | 18,718,635 | 19,475,993 | 25,869,294 | 26,899,241 |
Due after ten years | 6,011,789 | 6,138,326 | 601,546 | 646,192 |
| $ 68,114,129 | $ 70,882,334 | $ 36,780,206 | $ 38,089,720 |
The following table presents an analysis of investment securities in an unrealized loss position for which other-than-temporary impairments have not been recognized as of December 31, 2011: |
|
| Less than 12 Months | 12 Months or Longer | Total | |||
|
| Fair Value | Unrealized Losses | Fair Value | Unrealized Losses | Fair Value | Unrealized Losses |
| Available for Sale: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Obligations of states and political subdivisions | $ 1,953,623 | $ 8,060 | $ 1,485,943 | $ 5,664 | $ 3,439,566 | $ 13,724 |
| Total | 1,953,623 | 8,060 | 1,485,943 | 5,664 | 3,439,566 | 13,724 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Held to Maturity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Obligations of states and political subdivisions | 809,137 | 2,379 | 753,517 | 444 | 1,562,654 | 2,823 |
| Total | 809,137 | 2,379 | 753,517 | 444 | 1,562,654 | 2,823 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Overall Total | $ 2,762,760 | $ 10,439 | $ 2,239,460 | $ 6,108 | $ 5,002,220 | $ 16,547 |
| |||||||
The table above represents 8 investments held by the Company, the majority of which were rated A+ or higher. The unrealized losses on the Companys investments were the result of interest rate increases over the previous years. The total unrealized loss was less than 0.34% of the fair value of the affected investments. Based on the credit ratings of these investments, along with the consideration of whether the Company has the intent to sell or will be more likely than not required to sell the applicable investment before recovery of amortized cost basis, the Company does not consider the impairment of these investments to be other-than-temporary at December 31, 2011. |
Proceeds from sales of securities during 2011 were $3,085,237. Gross gains of $24,157 and gross losses of $12,345 were realized on these sales. Proceeds from redemptions of investment securities due to the exercise of call provisions by the issuers thereof and regularly scheduled maturities during 2011 were $13,795,000. Gross gains of $1,231 were realized from these redemptions. There were no sales of investments in debt securities available-for-sale or held-to-maturity during 2010. Proceeds from redemptions of investment securities due to the exercise of call provisions by the issuers thereof and regularly scheduled maturities during 2010 were $9,254,950. Gross gains of $5,113 were realized from these redemptions. | ||||||
| ||||||
There were no sales of investments in debt securities available-for-sale or held-to-maturity during 2009. Proceeds from redemptions of investment securities due to the exercise of call provisions by the issuers thereof and regularly scheduled maturities during 2009 were $12,280,750. Gross gains of $4,758 and gross losses of $-0- were realized from these redemptions. | ||||||
| ||||||
| ||||||
4. FAIR VALUE | ||||||
| ||||||
FASB ASC 820 defines fair value as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date The following fair value hierarchy is used in selecting inputs used to determine the fair value of an asset or liability, with the highest priority given to Level 1, as these are the most transparent or reliable. A financial asset or liabilitys classification within the hierarchy is determined based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement. | ||||||
Level 1 - Quoted prices for identical instruments in active markets. Level 2 - Quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets; quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active; and model-derived valuations in which all significant inputs are observable in active markets. Level 3 - Valuations derived from valuation techniques in which one or more significant inputs are unobservable. The Company is responsible for the valuation process and as part of this process may use data from outside sources in establishing fair value. The Company performs due diligence to understand the inputs or how the data was calculated or derived. The Company employs a market approach in the valuation of its obligations of states, political subdivisions and municipal revenue bonds that are available-for-sale. These investments are valued on the basis of current market quotations provided by independent pricing services selected by Management based on the advice of an investment manager. To determine the value of a particular investment, these independent pricing services may use certain information with respect to market transactions in such investment or comparable investments, various relationships observed in the market between investments, quotations from dealers, and pricing metrics and calculated yield measures based on valuation methodologies commonly employed in the market for such investments. Quoted prices are subject to our internal price verification procedures. We validate prices received using a variety of methods, including, but not limited to comparison to other pricing services or corroboration of pricing by reference to independent market data such as a secondary broker. There was no change in this methodology during any period reported. | ||||||
Assets measured at fair value as of December 31, 2011 and 2010 are available-for-sale investment securities which are summarized below: | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
| Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date Using | |||
|
|
| Quoted Prices |
|
| |
|
|
| In Active | Significant |
| |
|
|
| Markets for | Other | Significant | |
|
|
| Identical | Observable | Unobservable | |
|
|
| Assets | Inputs | Inputs | |
| Description | 12/31/2011 | (Level 1) | (Level 2) | (Level 3) | |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| Corporate securities | $ 233,088 | $ 233,088 | $ -- | $ -- | |
| Obligations of states and political subdivisions | 70,649,246 | -- | 70,649,246 | -- | |
| Available-for-sale investment securities | $ 70,882,334 | $ 233,088 | $ 70,649,246 | $ -- | |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
| Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date Using | |||
|
|
| Quoted Prices |
|
| |
|
|
| In Active | Significant |
| |
|
|
| Markets for | Other | Significant | |
|
|
| Identical | Observable | Unobservable | |
|
|
| Assets | Inputs | Inputs | |
| Description | 12/31/2010 | (Level 1) | (Level 2) | (Level 3) | |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| Corporate securities | $ 377,066 | $ 377,066 | $ -- | $ -- | |
| Obligations of states and political subdivisions | 65,933,856 | -- | 65,933,856 | -- | |
| Available-for-sale investment securities | $66,310,922 | $ 377,066 | $ 65,933,856 | $ -- |
36
5. INSURANCE SUBSIDIARY RESTRICTIONS |
|
As of December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively, 92% and 88% the Company's cash and cash equivalents and investment securities were maintained in the Companys insurance subsidiaries. State insurance regulations limit the types of investments an insurance company may hold in its portfolio. These limitations specify types of eligible investments, quality of investments and the percentage a particular investment may constitute of an insurance companys portfolio. Dividend payments to the Company by its wholly owned insurance subsidiaries are subject to annual limitations and are restricted to the greater of 10% of statutory surplus or statutory earnings before recognizing realized investment gains of the individual insurance subsidiaries, unless prior approval is obtained from the Georgia Insurance Commissioner. At December 31, 2011, Frandisco Property and Casualty Insurance Company and Frandisco Life Insurance Company had a statutory surplus of $46.2 million and $46.7 million, respectively. No dividends were paid to the parent company during 2011. |
6. SENIOR DEBT |
|
Effective September 11, 2009, the Company entered into a credit facility with Wells Fargo Preferred Capital, Inc. As amended to date, the credit agreement provides for borrowings of up to $100.0 million, subject to certain limitations, and all borrowings are secured by the finance receivables of the Company. The credit agreement contains covenants customary for financing transactions of this type. Available borrowings under the credit agreement were $100.0 million at December 31, 2011, at an interest rate of 3.75%. This compares to available borrowings of $99.1 million at December 31, 2010, at an interest rate of 3.75%. |
|
Available but unborrowed amounts under the credit agreement are subject to a periodic unused line fee of .50%. The interest rate under the credit agreement is equivalent to the greater of (a) .75% per annum plus 300 basis points or (b) the three month London Interbank Offered Rate (the LIBOR Rate) plus 300 basis points. The LIBOR Rate is be adjusted on the first day of each calendar month based upon the LIBOR Rate as of the last day of the preceding calendar month. |
|
The Credit Agreement has a commitment termination date of September 11, 2014. Any then- outstanding balance under the Credit Agreement would be due and payable on such date. The lender also may terminate the agreement upon the violation of any of the financial ratio requirements or covenants contained in the Credit Agreement or if the financial condition of the Company becomes unsatisfactory to the lender, according to standards set forth in the Credit Agreement. Such financial ratio requirements include a minimum equity requirement, an interest expense coverage ratio and a minimum debt to equity ratio, among others. At December 31, 2011, the Company was in compliance with all covenants. |
|
At December 31, 2011, the Company had no borrowings under the credit agreement. At December 31, 2010, the Company had borrowings of $.9 million at an interest rate of 3.75%. |
|
The Companys Senior Demand Notes are unsecured obligations which are payable on demand. The interest rate payable on any Senior Demand Note is a variable rate, compounded daily, established from time to time by the Company. |
|
Commercial Paper is issued by the Company only to qualified investors, in amounts in excess of $50,000, with maturities of less than 270 days and at interest rates that the Company believes are competitive in its market. |
|
Additional data related to the Company's senior debt is as follows: |
| Weighted |
|
|
|
| Average | Maximum | Average | Weighted |
| Interest | Amount | Amount | Average |
Year Ended | Rate at end | Outstanding | Outstanding | Interest Rate |
December 31 | of Year | During Year | During Year | During Year |
| (In thousands, except % data) | |||
2011: |
|
|
|
|
Bank | 3.75% | $ 2,925 | $ 60 | 3.75% |
Senior Demand Notes | 2.12 | 47,607 | 43,089 | 2.10 |
Commercial Paper | 3.95 | 197,194 | 185,120 | 4.25 |
All Categories | 3.60 | 244,439 | 228,269 | 4.08 |
|
|
|
|
|
37
| Weighted |
|
|
|
| Average | Maximum | Average | Weighted |
| Interest | Amount | Amount | Average |
Year Ended | Rate at end | Outstanding | Outstanding | Interest Rate |
December 31 | of Year | During Year | During Year | During Year |
| (In thousands, except % data) | |||
2010: |
|
|
|
|
Bank | 3.75% | $ 16,912 | $ 1,472 | 3.75% |
Senior Demand Notes | 2.11 | 42,031 | 41,502 | 2.16 |
Commercial Paper | 4.45 | 167,200 | 145,820 | 4.86 |
All Categories | 3.99 | 208,492 | 188,794 | 4.27 |
|
|
|
|
|
2009: |
|
|
|
|
Bank | 3.75% | $ 31,861 | $ 14,422 | 2.99% |
Senior Demand Notes | 2.21 | 45,286 | 42,399 | 2.81 |
Commercial Paper | 5.64 | 129,435 | 118,271 | 5.82 |
All Categories | 4.72 | 186,849 | 175,092 | 4.86 |
7. SUBORDINATED DEBT |
|
The payment of the principal and interest on the Companys subordinated debt is subordinate and junior in right of payment to all unsubordinated indebtedness of the Company. |
|
Subordinated debt consists of Variable Rate Subordinated Debentures issued from time to time by the Company, and which mature four years after their date of issue. The maturity date is automatically extended for an additional four year term unless the holder or the Company redeems the debenture on its original maturity date or within any applicable grace period thereafter. The debentures are offered and sold in various minimum purchase amounts with varying interest rates and interest adjustment periods for each respective minimum purchase amount, as established from time to time by the Company. Interest rates on the debentures automatically adjust at the end of each adjustment period. The debentures may also be redeemed by the holder at the applicable interest adjustment date or within any applicable grace period thereafter without penalty. Redemptions at any other time are at the discretion of the Company and are subject to a penalty. The Company may redeem the debentures for a price equal to 100% of the principal plus accrued but unpaid interest upon 30 days notice to the holder. |
|
Interest rate information on the Companys subordinated debt at December 31 is as follows: |
Weighted Average Interest Rate at |
| Weighted Average Interest Rate | ||||
End of Year |
| During Year | ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011 | 2010 | 2009 |
| 2011 | 2010 | 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.54% | 4.68% | 5.77% |
| 4.10% | 5.20% | 5.89% |
Maturity information relating to the Company's subordinated debt at December 31, 2011 is as follows: |
| Amount Maturing | |
| Based on Maturity | Based on Interest |
| Date | Adjustment Period |
|
|
|
2012 | $ 9,415,804 | $ 31,753,869 |
2013 | 9,639,872 | 8,860,306 |
2014 | 12,055,385 | 2,929,268 |
2015 | 15,759,015 | 3,326,633 |
| $ 46,870,076 | $ 46,870,076 |
8. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES |
|
The Company's operations are carried on in locations which are occupied under operating lease agreements. These lease agreements usually provide for a lease term of five years with the Company holding a renewal option for an additional five years. Total operating lease expense was $5,010,851, $4,766,642 and $4,727,213 for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively. The Companys minimum aggregate lease commitments at December 31, 2011 are shown in the table below. |
38
|
| 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | |
|
|
|
|
| |
| Current Federal | $ 3,077,083 | $ 2,457,099 | $ 2,649,391 | |
| Current State | 4,500 | 10,214 | 12,180 | |
| Total Current | 3,081,583 | 2,467,313 | 2,661,571 | |
|
|
|
|
| |
| Deferred Federal | 24,348 | 272,131 | 15,771 | |
|
|
|
|
| |
| Total Provision | $ 3,105,931 | $ 2,739,444 | $ 2,677,342 | |
| |||||
Temporary differences create deferred federal tax assets and liabilities, which are detailed below for December 31, 2011 and 2010. These amounts are included in accounts payable and accrued expenses in the accompanying consolidated statements of financial position. |
| Deferred Tax Assets (Liabilities) | |
|
|
|
| 2011 | 2010 |
Insurance Commission | $ (4,996,555) | $ (4,584,854) |
Unearned Premium Reserves | 1,867,608 | 1,711,820 |
Unrealized Gain on |
|
|
Marketable Debt Securities | (631,466) | (372,392) |
Other | (113,557) | (345,122) |
| $ (3,873.970) | $ (3,590,548) |
The Company's effective tax rate for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009 is analyzed as follows. Rates were higher during the year ended December 31, 2009 due to less income at the S corporation level which was passed to the shareholders of the Company for tax reporting, whereas income earned by the insurance subsidiaries was taxed at the corporate level. Shareholders were able to use S corporation losses to offset other income they may have had to the extent of their basis in their S corporation stock. |
|
| 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | |
| Statutory Federal income tax rate | 34.0% | 34.0% | 34.0% | |
| State income tax, net of Federal |
|
|
| |
| tax effect | - | - | .1 | |
| Net tax effect of IRS regulations |
|
|
| |
| on life insurance subsidiary | (1.5) | (2.3) | (4.8) | |
| Tax effect of S corporation status | (20.5) | (17.0) | 1.5 | |
| Tax exempt income | (2.4) | (3.0) | (6.7) | |
| Other Items | .- | .- | .1 | |
| Effective Tax Rate | 9.6% | 11.7% | 24.2% | |
| |||||
12. ACQUISITION: | |||||
| |||||
Prior to December 2009, the Company owned 50% of the outstanding shares of T&T Corporation. T&T Corporation owns a building currently leased to the Company. In December 2009, the Company purchased the remaining outstanding shares of T&T Corporation for consideration of $27,601 in cash, which is net of $143,870 of cash acquired. Total assets assumed were $289,748. | |||||
|
|
13. SEGMENT FINANCIAL INFORMATION: |
|
The Company discloses segment information in accordance with FASB ASC 280. FASB ASC 280 requires companies to determine segments based on how management makes decisions about allocating resources to segments and measuring their performance. |
|
On and prior to December 31, 2010, the Company had six reportable segments: Division I through Division V and Division VII. Each segment was comprised of a number of branch offices that are aggregated based on vice president responsibility and geographical location. Division I was comprised of offices located in South Carolina. Division II was comprised of offices in North Georgia, Division III encompassed Central and South Georgia offices, and Division VII was comprised of offices in West Georgia. Division IV represents our Alabama and Tennessee offices, and our offices in Louisiana and Mississippi encompass Division V. Division VI is reserved for future use. Effective January 1, 2011, Management realigned offices in Division VII between Division II and Division III. Division VII is no longer a reportable segment. Segment reporting for 2010 and 2009 have been reclassified to conform to the new alignment, with no changes to consolidated results. |
|
Accounting policies of the segments are the same as those of the Company described in the summary of significant accounting policies. Performance is measured based on objectives set at the beginning of each year and include various factors such as segment profit, growth in earning assets and delinquency and loan loss management. All segment revenues result from transactions with third parties. The Company does not allocate income taxes or corporate headquarter expenses to the segments. |
41
Below is a performance recap of each of the Company's reportable segments for the year ended December 31, 2011 followed by a reconciliation to consolidated Company data. |
Year 2011 |
| Division I | Division II | Division III | Division IV | Division V |
| Total Segments | ||
Revenues: |
| ( In Millions) | ||||||||
Finance Charges Earned | $ 16.0 | $ 25.0 | $ 25.5 | $ 23.0 | $ 19.3 | $ 108.8 | ||||
Insurance Income | 2.8 | 9.7 | 9.5 | 4.7 | 4.8 | 31.5 | ||||
Other | .1 | 2.0 | 1.8 | 1.1 | 1.6 | 6.6 | ||||
|
| 18.9 | 36.7 | 36.8 | 28.8 | 25.7 | 146.9 | |||
Expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Interest Cost | 1.3 | 2.9 | 3.0 | 2.6 | 1.8 | 11.6 | ||||
Provision for Loan Losses | 3.3 | 5.1 | 5.9 | 4.1 | 3.4 | 21.8 | ||||
Depreciation | .4 | .5 | .5 | .5 | .4 | 2.3 | ||||
Other | 8.5 | 11.9 | 12.5 | 11.1 | 10.6 | 54.6 | ||||
13.5 | 20.4 | 21.9 | 18.3 | 16.2 | 90.3 | |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Segment Profit | $ 5.4 | $ 16.3 | $ 14.9 | $ 10.5 | $ 9.5 | $ 56.6 | ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Segment Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Net Receivables | $ 40.4 | $ 87.3 | $ 88.2 | $ 80.2 | $ 56.2 | $352.3 | ||||
Cash | .4 | .8 | .9 | .6 | .7 | 3.4 | ||||
Net Fixed Assets | 1.0 | 1.6 | 1.5 | 1.6 | 1.1 | 6.8 | ||||
Other Assets | .0 | .1 | .0 | .1 | .1 | .3 | ||||
Total Segment Assets | $ 41.8 | $ 89.8 | $ 90.6 | $ 82.5 | $ 58.1 | $362.8 | ||||
| ||||||||||
RECONCILIATION: | 2011 | |||||||||
Revenues: |
| (In Millions) | ||||||||
Total revenues from reportable segments | $ 146.9 | |||||||||
Corporate finance charges earned not allocated to segments | .1 | |||||||||
Reclass of insurance expense against insurance income | 2.9 | |||||||||
Timing difference of insurance income allocation to segments | 7.9 | |||||||||
Other revenues not allocated to segments | .1 | |||||||||
Consolidated Revenues | $157.9 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Net Income: |
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Total profit or loss for reportable segments | $ 56.6 | |||||||||
Corporate earnings not allocated | 10.9 | |||||||||
Corporate expenses not allocated | (35.3) | |||||||||
Income taxes not allocated | (3.1) | |||||||||
Consolidated Net Income | $ 29.1 | |||||||||
| ||||||||||
Assets: | ||||||||||
Total assets for reportable segments | $362.8 | |||||||||
Loans held at corporate home office level | 2.2 | |||||||||
Unearned insurance at corporate level | (15.2) | |||||||||
Allowance for loan losses at corporate level | (21.4) | |||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents held at corporate level | 18.5 | |||||||||
Investment securities at corporate level | 107.7 | |||||||||
Fixed assets at corporate level | 2.6 | |||||||||
Other assets at corporate level | 7.7 | |||||||||
Consolidated Assets | $464.9 |
42
Below is a performance recap of each of the Company's reportable segments for the year ended December 31, 2010 followed by a reconciliation to consolidated Company data. |
Year 2010 |
| Division I | Division II | Division III | Division IV | Division V |
| Total Segments | ||
Revenues: |
| ( In Millions) | ||||||||
Finance Charges Earned | $ 14.8 | $ 23.1 | $ 24.5 | $ 20.9 | $ 17.1 | $ 100.4 | ||||
Insurance Income | 2.7 | 8.6 | 9.2 | 4.4 | 4.3 | 29.2 | ||||
Other | .1 | 1.7 | 1.6 | .9 | 1.3 | 5.6 | ||||
|
| 17.6 | 33.4 | 35.3 | 26.2 | 22.7 | 135.2 | |||
Expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Interest Cost | 1.4 | 3.2 | 3.3 | 2.6 | 1.8 | 12.3 | ||||
Provision for Loan Losses | 3.0 | 5.6 | 6.1 | 5.3 | 3.6 | 23.6 | ||||
Depreciation | .4 | .5 | .4 | .5 | .3 | 2.1 | ||||
Other | 8.2 | 11.7 | 12.5 | 10.4 | 9.9 | 52.7 | ||||
13.0 | 21.0 | 22.3 | 18.8 | 15.6 | 90.7 | |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Segment Profit | $ 4.6 | $ 12.4 | $ 13.0 | $ 7.4 | $ 7.1 | $ 44.5 | ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Segment Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Net Receivables | $ 39.6 | $ 82.8 | $ 86.3 | $ 72.4 | $ 50.2 | $331.3 | ||||
Cash | .3 | .6 | .8 | .5 | .4 | 2.6 | ||||
Net Fixed Assets | .7 | .9 | .8 | 1.3 | .7 | 4.4 | ||||
Other Assets | .0 | .1 | .1 | .2 | .1 | .5 | ||||
Total Segment Assets | $ 40.6 | $ 84.4 | $ 88.0 | $ 74.4 | $ 51.4 | $338.8 | ||||
| ||||||||||
RECONCILIATION: | 2010 | |||||||||
Revenues: |
| (In Millions) | ||||||||
Total revenues from reportable segments | $ 135.2 | |||||||||
Corporate finance charges earned not allocated to segments | .1 | |||||||||
Reclass of insurance expense against insurance income | 2.7 | |||||||||
Timing difference of insurance income allocation to segments | 7.3 | |||||||||
Other revenues not allocated to segments | .2 | |||||||||
Consolidated Revenues | $145.5 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Net Income: |
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Total profit or loss for reportable segments | $ 44.5 | |||||||||
Corporate earnings not allocated | 10.2 | |||||||||
Corporate expenses not allocated | (31.3) | |||||||||
Income taxes not allocated | (2.7) | |||||||||
Consolidated Net Income | $ 20.7 | |||||||||
| ||||||||||
Assets: | ||||||||||
Total assets for reportable segments | $338.8 | |||||||||
Loans held at corporate home office level | 1.7 | |||||||||
Unearned insurance at corporate level | (13.9) | |||||||||
Allowance for loan losses at corporate level | (24.1) | |||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents held at corporate level | 31.8 | |||||||||
Investment securities at corporate level | 78.2 | |||||||||
Fixed assets at corporate level | 2.3 | |||||||||
Other assets at corporate level | 7.3 | |||||||||
Consolidated Assets | $422.1 |
43
Below is a performance recap of each of the Company's reportable segments for the year ended December 31, 2009 followed by a reconciliation to consolidated Company data. |
Year 2009 |
| Division I | Division II | Division III | Division IV | Division V |
| Total Segments | ||
Revenues: |
| ( In Millions) | ||||||||
Finance Charges Earned | $ 14.0 | $ 21.9 | $ 24.2 | $ 19.8 | $ 16.4 | $ 96.3 | ||||
Insurance Income | 2.8 | 8.2 | 9.1 | 4.2 | 4.2 | 28.5 | ||||
Other | .1 | 1.5 | 1.6 | .8 | 1.0 | 5.0 | ||||
|
| 16.9 | 31.6 | 34.9 | 24.8 | 21.6 | 129.8 | |||
Expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Interest Cost | 1.6 | 3.5 | 3.7 | 2.8 | 2.0 | 13.6 | ||||
Provision for Loan Losses | 4.2 | 6.1 | 6.3 | 5.3 | 3.6 | 25.5 | ||||
Depreciation | .4 | .4 | .4 | .5 | .3 | 2.0 | ||||
Other | 8.5 | 11.9 | 13.0 | 9.7 | 9.7 | 52.8 | ||||
14.7 | 21.9 | 23.4 | 18.3 | 15.6 | 93.9 | |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Segment Profit | $ 2.2 | $ 9.7 | $ 11.5 | $ 6.5 | $ 6.0 | $ 35.9 | ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Segment Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Net Receivables | $ 36.5 | $ 79.4 | $ 85.1 | $ 68.6 | $ 46.6 | $316.2 | ||||
Cash | .4 | .8 | 1.2 | .7 | .7 | 3.8 | ||||
Net Fixed Assets | 1.0 | 1.1 | 1.1 | 1.4 | .8 | 5.4 | ||||
Other Assets | .0 | .1 | .0 | .1 | .0 | .2 | ||||
Total Segment Assets | $ 37.9 | $ 81.4 | $ 87.4 | $ 70.8 | $ 48.1 | $325.6 | ||||
| ||||||||||
RECONCILIATION: | 2009 | |||||||||
Revenues: |
| (In Millions) | ||||||||
Total revenues from reportable segments | $ 129.8 | |||||||||
Corporate finance charges earned not allocated to segments | .2 | |||||||||
Reclass of insurance expense against insurance income | 2.8 | |||||||||
Timing difference of insurance income allocation to segments | 6.9 | |||||||||
Other revenues not allocated to segments | .1 | |||||||||
Consolidated Revenues | $139.8 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Net Income: |
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Total profit or loss for reportable segments | $ 35.9 | |||||||||
Corporate earnings not allocated | 10.1 | |||||||||
Corporate expenses not allocated | (34.9) | |||||||||
Income taxes not allocated | (2.7) | |||||||||
Consolidated Net Income | $ 8.4 | |||||||||
| ||||||||||
Assets: | ||||||||||
Total assets for reportable segments | $325.6 | |||||||||
Loans held at corporate home office level | 2.7 | |||||||||
Unearned insurance at corporate level | (13.1) | |||||||||
Allowance for loan losses at corporate level | (26.6) | |||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents held at corporate level | 25.5 | |||||||||
Investment securities at corporate level | 73.5 | |||||||||
Fixed assets at corporate level | 2.4 | |||||||||
Other assets at corporate level | 6.4 | |||||||||
Consolidated Assets | $396.4 |
44
DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS |
|
Directors |
Principal Occupation, Has Served as a |
Name Title and Company Director Since |
|
Ben F. Cheek, III Chairman of Board and Chief Executive Officer, 1967 |
1st Franklin Financial Corporation |
|
Ben F. Cheek, IV Vice Chairman of Board, 2001 |
1st Franklin Financial Corporation |
|
A. Roger Guimond Executive Vice President and 2004 |
Chief Financial Officer, |
1st Franklin Financial Corporation |
|
John G. Sample, Jr. Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, 2004 |
Atlantic American Corporation |
|
C. Dean Scarborough Real Estate Agent 2004 |
|
Robert E. Thompson Retired Doctor 1970 |
|
Keith D. Watson Vice President and Corporate Secretary, 2004 |
Bowen & Watson, Inc. |
|
Executive Officers |
Served in this |
Name Position with Company Position Since |
|
Ben F. Cheek, III Chairman of Board and CEO 1989 |
|
Ben F. Cheek, IV Vice Chairman of Board 2001 |
|
Virginia C. Herring President 2001 |
|
A. Roger Guimond Executive Vice President and |
Chief Financial Officer 1991 |
|
J. Michael Culpepper Executive Vice President and 2006 |
Chief Operating Officer |
|
C. Michael Haynie Executive Vice President - 2006 |
Human Resources |
|
Karen S. Lovern Executive Vice President - 2006 |
Strategic and Organization Development |
|
Charles E. Vercelli, Jr. Executive Vice President - 2008 |
General Counsel |
|
Lynn E. Cox Vice President / Secretary & Treasurer 1989 |
|
CORPORATE INFORMATION |
|
Corporate Offices Legal Counsel Independent Registered Public |
P.O. Box 880 Jones Day Accounting Firm |
135 East Tugalo Street Atlanta, Georgia Deloitte & Touche LLP |
Toccoa, Georgia 30577 Atlanta, Georgia |
(706) 886-7571 |
|
Requests for Additional Information |
Informational inquiries, including requests for a copy of the Companys most recent annual report on Form 10-K, and any subsequent quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, should be addressed to the Company's Secretary at the corporate offices listed above. |
45
BRANCH OPERATIONS | |||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||
Division I - South Carolina | |||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||
| Virginia K. Palmer | ---------- | Vice President |
| |||||||||||||
| Regional Operations Directors |
| |||||||||||||||
| Richard F. Corirossi |
| Brian L. McSwain |
| |||||||||||||
| David A. Hoard |
| Larry D. Mixson |
| |||||||||||||
| Victoria A. McLeod |
|
|
| |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||
Division II - North Georgia * | |||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||
| Ronald F. Morrow | ---------- | Vice President |
| |||||||||||||
| Regional Operations Directors |
| |||||||||||||||
| Ronald E. Byerly |
| John R. Massey |
| |||||||||||||
| A. Keith Chavis |
| Sharon S. Langford |
| |||||||||||||
| Shelia H. Garrett |
| Diana L. Lewis |
| |||||||||||||
| Janee G. Huff |
| Harriet H. Welch |
| |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||
Division III South Georgia * | |||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||
| Marcus C. Thomas | ---------- | Vice President |
| |||||||||||||
| Regional Operations Directors |
| |||||||||||||||
| Bertrand P. Brown |
| Thomas C. Lennon |
| |||||||||||||
| William J. Daniel |
| James A. Mahaffey |
| |||||||||||||
| Judy A. Landon |
| Jennifer C. Purser |
| |||||||||||||
| Jeffrey C. Lee |
| Michelle Rentz-Benton |
| |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||
Division IV - Alabama and Tennessee | |||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||
| Michael J. Whitaker | ---------- | Vice President |
| |||||||||||||
| Joseph R. Cherry | ---------- | Area Vice President (TN) |
| |||||||||||||
| Regional Operations Directors |
| |||||||||||||||
| Brian M. Hill |
| Johnny M. Olive |
| |||||||||||||
| Jerry H. Hughes |
| Hilda L. Phillips |
| |||||||||||||
| Janice E. Childers |
| Henrietta R. Reathford |
| |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||
Division V Louisiana and Mississippi | |||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||
| James P. Smith, III | ---------- | Vice President |
| |||||||||||||
| Regional Operations Directors |
| |||||||||||||||
| Sonya L. Acosta |
| T. Loy Davis |
| |||||||||||||
| Bryan W. Cook |
| Carla A. Eldridge |
| |||||||||||||
| Charles R. Childress |
| John B. Gray |
| |||||||||||||
| Jeremy R. Cranfield |
| Marty B. Miskelly |
| |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||
* Note: Prior to January 1, 2011, Division VII was an area encompassing northwest and central Georgia. Effective January 1, 2011, the branches in this division were reconfigured into Division II North Georgia or Division III South Georgia. | |||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||
ADMINISTRATION | |||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||
Lynn E. Cox | Vice President
Investment Center |
| Anita S. Looney | Vice President Branch Administration | |||||||||||||
Cindy H. Mullin | Vice President Information Technology |
| Pamela S. Rickman | Vice President - Compliance / Audit | |||||||||||||
Brian D. Lingle | Vice President Controller |
| R. Darryl Parker | Vice President - Employee Development | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
___________________ |
|
2011 BEN F. CHEEK, JR. "OFFICE OF THE YEAR" |
|
|
********************* |
** PICTURE OF EMPLOYEES ** |
********************* |
|
|
This award is presented annually in recognition of the office that represents the highest overall performance within the Company. Congratulations to the entire Jackson, Georgia staff for this significant achievement. The Friendly Franklin Folks salute you! |
47
INSIDE BACK COVER PAGE OF ANNUAL REPORT |
|
(Graphic showing state maps of Alabama, Georgia, Louisiana, Mississippi and South Carolina which is regional operating territory of Company and listing of branch offices) |
|
1st FRANKLIN FINANCIAL CORPORATION BRANCH OFFICES |
ALABAMA | |||||
Adamsville | Bessemer | Enterprise | Huntsville (2) | Opp | Scottsboro |
Albertville | Center Point | Fayette | Jasper | Oxford | Selma |
Alexander City | Clanton | Florence | Moody | Ozark | Sylacauga |
Andalusia | Cullman | Fort Payne | Moulton | Pelham | Troy |
Arab | Decatur | Gadsden | Muscle Shoals | Prattville | Tuscaloosa |
Athens | Dothan | Hamilton | Opelika | Russellville (2) | Wetumpka |
GEORGIA | |||||
Adel | Canton | Dahlonega | Georgetown | Madison | Statesboro |
Albany (2) | Carrollton | Dallas | Gray | Manchester | Stockbridge |
Alma | Cartersville | Dalton | Greensboro | McDonough | Swainsboro |
Americus | Cedartown | Dawson | Griffin | Milledgeville | Sylvania |
Athens (2) | Chatsworth | Douglas (2) | Hartwell | Monroe | Sylvester |
Bainbridge | Clarkesville | Douglasville | Hawkinsville | Montezuma | Thomaston |
Barnesville | Claxton | Dublin | Hazlehurst | Monticello | Thomson |
Baxley | Clayton | East Ellijay | Helena | Moultrie | Tifton |
Blairsville | Cleveland | Eastman | Hinesville (2) | Nashville | Toccoa |
Blakely | Cochran | Eatonton | Hogansville | Newnan | Valdosta |
Blue Ridge | Colquitt | Elberton | Jackson | Perry | Vidalia |
Bremen | Commerce | Fitzgerald | Jasper | Pooler | Villa Rica |
Brunswick | Conyers | Flowery Branch | Jefferson | Richmond Hill | Warner Robins |
Buford | Cordele | Forsyth | Jesup | Rome | Washington |
Butler | Cornelia | Fort Valley | LaGrange | Royston | Waycross |
Cairo | Covington | Gainesville | Lavonia | Sandersville | Waynesboro |
Calhoun | Cumming | Garden City | Lawrenceville | Savannah | Winder |
LOUISIANA | |||||
Alexandria | DeRidder | Jena | Minden | New Iberia | Ruston |
Bossier City | Eunice | Lafayette | Monroe | Opelousas | Slidell |
Bastrop | Franklin | LaPlace | Morgan City | Pineville | Thibodaux |
Crowley | Hammond | Leesville | Natchitoches | Prairieville | Winnsboro |
Denham Springs | Houma | Marksville |
|
|
|
DeRidder
MISSISSIPPI | |||||
Batesville | Columbus | Hazlehurst | Kosciusko | Newton | Ripley |
Bay St. Louis | Corinth | Hernando | Magee | Oxford | Senatobia |
Booneville | Forest | Houston | McComb | Pearl | Starkville |
Brookhaven | Grenada | Iuka | Meridian | Philadelphia | Tupelo |
Carthage | Gulfport | Jackson | New Albany | Picayune | Winona |
Columbia | Hattiesburg |
|
|
|
|
Columbia
SOUTH CAROLINA | |||||
Aiken | Chester | Greenville | Greenwood | North Greenville | Summerville |
Anderson | Columbia | Greenwood | Manning | Orangeburg | Sumter |
Batesburg- Leesville | Conway | Greer | Marion | Rock Hill | Union |
Camden | Dillon | Hartsville | Moncks Corner | Seneca | Walterboro |
Cayce | Easley | Lancaster | Newberry | Simpsonville | Winnsboro |
Charleston | Florence | Laurens | North Augusta | Spartanburg | York |
Cheraw | Gaffney | Lexington | North Charleston |
|
|
| |||||
| |||||
1st FRANKLIN FINANCIAL CORPORATION BRANCH OFFICES (Continued) | |||||
| |||||
TENNESSEE | |||||
Aloca | Cleveland | Elizabethton | Knoxville | Lenior City | Newport |
Athens | Crossville | Johnson City | LaFollette | Madisonville | Sparta |
Bristol | Dayton | Kingsport |
|
|
|
|
|
1st FRANKLIN FINANCIAL CORPORATION |
|
|
MISSION STATEMENT: |
|
"1st Franklin Financial is a major provider of financial and consumer services to individuals and families. Our business will be managed according to best practices that will allow us to maintain a healthy financial position. |
|
|
|
|
CORE VALUES: |
|
Ø Integrity Without Compromise |
|
Ø Open Honest Communication |
|
Ø Respect all Customers and Employees |
|
Ø Teamwork and Collaboration |
|
Ø Personal Accountability |
|
Ø Run It Like You Own It |
48