Attached files

file filename
8-K - 8-K - CALGON CARBON Corpd314246d8k.htm
EX-10.1 - EX-10.1 - CALGON CARBON Corpd314246dex101.htm
EX-99.1 - EX-99.1 - CALGON CARBON Corpd314246dex991.htm
APPENDICES
Exhibit 99.2


BALLAST WATER TREATMENT


3
Why Ballast Water Treatment?
The issue: Transfer of invasive species
via ships’
ballast water


4
Regulations Drive Market
Regulations
International Maritime Organization (IMO) adopted 
International Convention for the Control and Management of
Ships’
Ballast Water and Sediments (BWMC)
Sets framework for legislation for 169 Member States
Ratification requires 30 signatories representing 35.0% of world’s
tonnage
33 signatories representing approximately 26.5% of the world’s
tonnage have ratified BWMC
Ratification of the BWMC expected to occur in 2012
U.S. Coast Guard finalizing rule:
Awaiting publication in Federal Register
Phase 1 expected to be similar to the IMO standard


5
GUARDIAN™
Value Proposition
Filtration -
Stacked Disk Technology
Advantages over other separation technologies
Less maintenance than screen filters
Flexible footprint
Cost competitive
Low operating cost < $0.02/C
3
M water/hour treated
Disinfection -
UV
Advantages
No chemicals required
Suitable for fresh water applications


DISINFECTION BYPRODUCTS


7
What Are Disinfection Byproducts?
Disinfection Byproducts (DBPs) form when disinfectants used to
treat drinking water react with Naturally Occurring Materials (NOMs)
in the water (e.g.; decomposing plant material).
Trihalomethanes
Chloroform
Bromodichloro Methane
NOMs + Cl
2
Halo Acetic Acids
Dichloroacetic Acid
Trichloroacetic Acid


8
Why
DBP Is Growth Opportunity For CCC?
GAC proven solution to prevent and/or eliminate DBPs
Market Size:  100+ MM lbs. GAC per year (or equivalent) by 2015
CCC is market leader
Supports reactivation strategy
Driver to convert municipalities to reactivation
NSF certifications currently at two plants
More virgin GAC available for other markets
CCC to build reactivation facility for Phoenix region which includes a 10-
year reactivation contract (15-20 MM lbs.)


MERCURY REMOVAL


10
Update:  Mercury Removal For Coal-Fired
Power Plants
U.S. final Mercury and Toxic Standards Rule (Utility MACT)
issued by EPA 12/16/11
Requirements and timing as expected
Prevent 91% of mercury contained in coal from release to air
Compliance:  February 2015 with possible extension
93 GW will require activated carbon injection by 2015 (EPA
estimate)


11
CCC
A Leader In Mercury Removal: 
Innovative Products
FLUEPAC®
products in use at 18 plants (>9,000 MW
generating capacity)
Developed enhanced performance products over two years
New products reduce customer cost
Carbon injection rates 50% to 70% lower than alternative
products
Fewer deliveries = lower transportation costs
Lower particulate loading to ESP/baghouse
Less PAC in fly ash = more “concrete friendly”