Attached files
| file | filename |
|---|---|
| EXCEL - IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT - DIAMOND HILL INVESTMENT GROUP INC | Financial_Report.xls |
| EX-32.1 - EXHIBIT 32.1 - DIAMOND HILL INVESTMENT GROUP INC | c25596exv32w1.htm |
| EX-31.1 - EXHIBIT 31.1 - DIAMOND HILL INVESTMENT GROUP INC | c25596exv31w1.htm |
| EX-31.2 - EXHIBIT 31.2 - DIAMOND HILL INVESTMENT GROUP INC | c25596exv31w2.htm |
| EX-23.1 - EXHIBIT 23.1 - DIAMOND HILL INVESTMENT GROUP INC | c25596exv23w1.htm |
| EX-21.1 - EXHIBIT 21.1 - DIAMOND HILL INVESTMENT GROUP INC | c25596exv21w1.htm |
Table of Contents
United States Securities and Exchange Commission
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form 10-K
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011
Commission file number 000-24498
DIAMOND HILL INVESTMENT GROUP, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
| Ohio | 65-0190407 | |
| (State of incorporation) | (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
| 325 John H. McConnell Blvd., Suite 200, Columbus, Ohio 43215 | 614-255-3333 | |
| (Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code) | (Registrant’s telephone number) |
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
| Title of each class | Name of each exchange on which registered | |
| Common shares, no par value | The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC |
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of
the Securities Act.
Yes o No þ
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or
Section 15(d) of the Act.
Yes o No þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is
not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in
definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K
or any amendment to this Form 10-K o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a
non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated
filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
| Large accelerated filer o | Accelerated filer þ | Non-accelerated filer o | Smaller reporting company o |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act).
Yes o No þ
Aggregate market value of the registrant’s common shares (the only common equity of the registrant)
held by non-affiliates of the registrant, based on the closing price of $81.29 on June 30, 2011 on
the NASDAQ Global Select Market was $181,168,747. Calculation of holdings by non-affiliates is
based upon the assumption, for these purposes only, that the registrant’s executive officers and
directors and persons holding five percent or more of the registrant’s common shares are
affiliates.
3,084,982 Common Shares outstanding as of March 7, 2012.
Documents incorporated by reference: Portions of the registrant’s definitive proxy statement for
the 2012 Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be filed pursuant to Regulation 14A under the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, are incorporated by reference into Part III of this report.
Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc.
Form 10-K
For the Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2011
Index
Form 10-K
For the Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2011
Index
| Required Information | Page | |||||||
| 3 | ||||||||
| 8 | ||||||||
| 10 | ||||||||
| 10 | ||||||||
| 10 | ||||||||
| 10 | ||||||||
| 11 | ||||||||
| 13 | ||||||||
| 13 | ||||||||
| 21 | ||||||||
| 22 | ||||||||
| 37 | ||||||||
| 37 | ||||||||
| 38 | ||||||||
| 38 | ||||||||
| 38 | ||||||||
| 38 | ||||||||
| 39 | ||||||||
| 39 | ||||||||
| 40 | ||||||||
| 41 | ||||||||
| Exhibit 21.1 | ||||||||
| Exhibit 23.1 | ||||||||
| Exhibit 31.1 | ||||||||
| Exhibit 31.2 | ||||||||
| Exhibit 32.1 | ||||||||
| EX-101 INSTANCE DOCUMENT | ||||||||
| EX-101 SCHEMA DOCUMENT | ||||||||
| EX-101 CALCULATION LINKBASE DOCUMENT | ||||||||
| EX-101 LABELS LINKBASE DOCUMENT | ||||||||
| EX-101 PRESENTATION LINKBASE DOCUMENT | ||||||||
| EX-101 DEFINITION LINKBASE DOCUMENT | ||||||||
2
Table of Contents
PART I
| Item 1. | Business |
Forward-Looking Statements
Throughout this Annual Report on Form 10-K, Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc. (the “Company”) may
make forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as
amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, relating to such
matters as anticipated operating results, prospects for achieving the critical threshold of assets
under management, technological developments, economic trends (including interest rates and market
volatility), expected transactions and acquisitions and similar matters. The words “believe,”
“expect,” “anticipate,” “estimate,” “should,” “hope,” “seek,” “plan,” “intend” and similar
expressions identify forward-looking statements that speak only as of the date thereof. While the
Company believes that the assumptions underlying its forward-looking statements are reasonable,
investors are cautioned that any of the assumptions could prove to be inaccurate and accordingly,
the actual results and experiences of the Company could differ materially from the anticipated
results or other expectations expressed by the Company in its forward-looking statements. Factors
that could cause such actual results or experiences to differ from results discussed in the
forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to: the adverse effect from a decline in
the securities markets; a decline in the performance of the Company’s products; changes in interest
rates; a general or prolonged downturn in the economy; changes in government policy and regulation,
including monetary policy; changes in the Company’s ability to attract or retain key employees;
unforeseen costs and other effects related to legal proceedings or investigations of governmental
and self-regulatory organizations; and other risks identified from time-to-time in the Company’s
other public documents on file with the U. S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), including
those discussed below in Item 1A.
General
The Company, an Ohio corporation organized in April 1990, derives its consolidated revenue and net
income from investment advisory and fund administration services provided by its subsidiaries
Diamond Hill Capital Management, Inc. (“DHCM”), Beacon Hill Fund Services, Inc. (“BHFS”), and BHIL
Distributors, Inc. (“BHIL”). BHFS and BHIL collectively operate as Beacon Hill. DHCM is a
registered investment adviser under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 providing investment
advisory services to individuals and institutional investors through Diamond Hill Funds, separate
accounts, and private investment funds (generally known as “hedge funds”). Beacon Hill was
incorporated during the first quarter of 2008, and provides certain fund administration services
and underwriting services to mutual fund companies, including Diamond Hill Funds.
The Company’s primary objective is to fulfill its fiduciary duty to clients through a disciplined
intrinsic value approach to investing. Its secondary objective is to achieve an adequate long-term
return for shareholders.
The Company sponsors, markets, and provides investment advisory and related services to various
U.S. and foreign clients including mutual funds, separate accounts, and private investment funds.
The Company’s principal source of revenue is investment advisory fee income earned pursuant to
investment advisory contracts with its clients. This fee income is based primarily upon the net
assets of the funds or separate accounts. The Company’s investment advisory revenue depends largely
on the total value and composition of assets under management (“AUM”). Accordingly, fluctuations
in financial markets and in the composition of AUM impact our revenues and results of operations.
Investment Advisory Activities
DHCM executes its investment strategies through fundamental research and valuation disciplines.
DHCM’s analysts evaluate a company’s prospects based upon its current business and financial
position, future growth opportunities, and management capability and strategy. The intended result
is an estimate of “intrinsic value.” Intrinsic value is the present value of estimated future cash
flows, discounted at a rate that reflects the required return for the investment given the
estimated level of risk. In other words, it is the estimated price a minority shareholder should
pay in order to achieve a satisfactory or “fair” return on the investment. The estimate of
intrinsic value is then compared to the current market price to evaluate whether, in the opinion of
DHCM, an attractive investment opportunity exists. A proprietary valuation model, which takes into
account
projected cash flows for five years including a “terminal value” (the expected stock price in five
years), assists in many of these intrinsic value estimations. DHCM also applies an intrinsic value
philosophy to the analysis of fixed income securities.
3
Table of Contents
DHCM believes that although securities markets are competitive, pricing inefficiencies often exist
allowing for attractive investment opportunities. Furthermore, DHCM believes that investing in
securities whose market prices are significantly below DHCM’s estimate of intrinsic value (or
selling short securities whose market prices are above DHCM’s estimate of intrinsic value) is a
reliable method to achieve above average relative returns as well as mitigate risk.
Current portfolio strategies managed by DHCM include Small Cap, Small-Mid Cap, Large Cap, Select,
Long-Short, Research Opportunities, Financial Long-Short, and Strategic Income. These strategies
are available on a separately managed basis and/or through a mutual fund. The Long-Short strategy
is also available through private investment funds that are offered to accredited and qualified
investors in the United States and around the world. The Company believes its desire to grow AUM
should never come before its fiduciary obligation to clients. Once the Company determines that the
size of any of its strategies hinders its ability to either differentiate its product or add value
for its clients, the Company will close those strategies to new clients, which may impact the
Company’s ability to grow AUM. The Small Cap strategy was closed to new investors as of December
31, 2005 and re-opened on September 1, 2007. The Long-Short strategy was closed to new investors as
of June 30, 2008 and re-opened on December 31, 2008.
Marketing
DHCM primarily generates business through wholesaling to financial intermediaries, including
independent registered investment advisors, brokers, financial planners, investment consultants and
third party marketing firms. In addition, DHCM actively markets its separately managed accounts
directly to institutional plan sponsors.
Assets Under Management
As of December 31, 2011, AUM totaled $8.7 billion, a 1% increase from December 31, 2010. The
following tables show AUM by product and investment objective for the dates indicated and a
roll-forward of the change in AUM for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010, and 2009:
| Assets Under Management by Product | ||||||||||||
| As of December 31, | ||||||||||||
| (in millions) | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||
Mutual funds |
$ | 4,237 | $ | 4,198 | $ | 3,494 | ||||||
Sub-advised mutual funds |
972 | 930 | 146 | |||||||||
Separate accounts |
3,294 | 3,284 | 2,423 | |||||||||
Private investment funds |
168 | 211 | 220 | |||||||||
Total AUM |
$ | 8,671 | $ | 8,623 | $ | 6,283 | ||||||
| Assets Under Management | ||||||||||||
| by Investment Objective | ||||||||||||
| As of December 31, | ||||||||||||
| (in millions) | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||
Small Cap |
$ | 932 | $ | 948 | $ | 625 | ||||||
Small-Mid Cap |
277 | 196 | 146 | |||||||||
Large Cap |
4,885 | 4,631 | 2,654 | |||||||||
Select (All Cap) |
321 | 422 | 400 | |||||||||
Long-Short |
2,082 | 2,251 | 2,300 | |||||||||
Strategic Income |
174 | 175 | 158 | |||||||||
Total AUM |
$ | 8,671 | $ | 8,623 | $ | 6,283 | ||||||
4
Table of Contents
| Change in Assets Under Management | ||||||||||||
| For the Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
| (in millions) | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||
AUM at beginning of the year |
$ | 8,623 | $ | 6,283 | $ | 4,510 | ||||||
Net cash inflows (outflows) |
||||||||||||
mutual funds |
77 | 467 | (109 | ) | ||||||||
sub-advised mutual funds |
21 | 714 | 6 | |||||||||
separate accounts |
(74 | ) | 532 | 734 | ||||||||
private investment funds |
(21 | ) | (15 | ) | (52 | ) | ||||||
| 3 | 1,698 | 579 | ||||||||||
Net market appreciation and income |
45 | 642 | 1,194 | |||||||||
Increase during the year |
48 | 2,340 | 1,773 | |||||||||
AUM at end of the year |
$ | 8,671 | $ | 8,623 | $ | 6,283 | ||||||
Diamond Hill Funds
The Diamond Hill Funds (the “Funds”) are used by over 12,600 financial representatives at over
1,300 financial intermediary firms. Below is a summary of the assets by distribution channel as of
December 31, 2011, 2010, and 2009:
| Diamond Hill Funds | ||||||||||||
| Assets by Distribution Channel | ||||||||||||
| As of December 31, | ||||||||||||
| (in millions) | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||
Registered investment advisors |
$ | 1,049 | $ | 1,080 | $ | 1,272 | ||||||
Independent broker/dealers |
665 | 815 | 757 | |||||||||
Wirehouse broker/dealers |
674 | 775 | 824 | |||||||||
Banks |
927 | 797 | 43 | |||||||||
Defined contribution |
737 | 493 | 211 | |||||||||
Other |
145 | 192 | 348 | |||||||||
Total |
$ | 4,197 | $ | 4,152 | $ | 3,455 | ||||||
Sub-advised mutual funds
Since 2009, DHCM has increased its sub-advised mutual funds relationships by $826 million.
Sub-advised mutual funds are registered investment companies, where DHCM manages an allocated
portion of the fund and has limited distribution responsibilities.
Institutional Accounts
DHCM develops institutional relationships for separately managed accounts through consultant
relationships and directly with plan sponsors.
Growth Prospects
DHCM’s investment strategies have produced long-term investment returns that the Company views as
strong and believes compare favorably to competitors. Investment returns have been a key driver in
the success the Company has achieved in growing AUM.
As a result, the Company has continued to invest in marketing throughout 2011 in an effort to
expand distribution. Such expenditures included:
| • | adding business development and support staff; |
| • | attending and sponsoring key industry conferences; and |
| • | adding systems infrastructure to support client service and portfolio
administration. |
5
Table of Contents
The cost of these efforts was significant, but the Company believes the cost will be proportional
to the increase in revenue during future years. There can be no assurance that the Company’s
marketing efforts will prove successful; however, given the strong investment results of the Funds
and institutional composites, the Company believes the additional resources devoted to marketing
are warranted.
Also recognizing that the Company’s primary responsibility is to clients, the Company will continue
to invest in its investment team and close investment strategies to new investors when appropriate.
Over the last three years, the Company substantially increased its equity investment team by
growing the team from 25 at the end of 2008 to 30 at the end of 2011. Most of the additional
investment team staff had been on the research team, which now totals 19.
The Company believes that one of the most important characteristics exhibited by the best
investment firms is excellent investment returns for their clients over a long period of time. The
Company is pleased that, during its history as an investment advisory firm, it has delivered what
it believes are strong investment returns for its clients. However, the Company is mindful that if
it fails to deliver acceptable investment returns in the future, its financial condition, results
of operations and business growth will likely be negatively impacted. There are certain additional
business risks that may prevent the Company from achieving the above growth prospects. These risks
are detailed in Item 1A.
Fund Administration Activities
DHCM and Beacon Hill provide fund administration services to Diamond Hill Funds and other third
party mutual fund companies. Fund administration services are broadly defined as portfolio and
regulatory compliance, treasury and financial oversight, underwriting, and general oversight of
other back-office services providers such as the custodian, fund accountant, and transfer agent.
During the past several years, there has been continuing consolidation in the mutual fund servicing
industry, whereby large financial services firms have purchased independent mutual fund service
providers. Some of these larger financial services firms have made the decision not to offer
statutory underwriting services to mutual funds, due to regulatory and other business conflicts.
This consolidation, along with a growing desire for transparent and independent oversight of mutual
fund financial reporting and compliance program activities, has provided opportunities in the
marketplace for the Company to grow its fund administration services. During 2008, Beacon Hill
completed the build out of its infrastructure and began operations. During 2009, 2010, and 2011,
Beacon Hill continued to focus on growing its client base.
Competition
Competition in the area of investment management services and mutual funds is intense, and the
Company’s competitors include investment management firms, broker-dealers, banks and insurance
companies, some of whom offer various investment alternatives. Many competitors are better known
than the Company, offer a broader range of investment products and have more offices, employees and
business development representatives. The Company competes primarily on the basis of investment
philosophy, performance and client service.
Corporate Investment Portfolio
The Company expects to hold investment positions in Diamond Hill Funds and its private investment
funds.
Regulation
DHCM is registered with the SEC under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 (the “Advisers Act”) and
operates in a highly regulated environment. The Advisers Act imposes numerous obligations on
registered investment advisers, including fiduciary duties, recordkeeping requirements, operational
requirements and disclosure obligations. All Diamond Hill Funds are registered with the SEC under
the Investment Company Act of 1940 and are required to make notice filings with all states where
they are offered for sale. Virtually all aspects of the Company’s investment management business
are subject to various federal and state laws and regulations. BHIL is registered with the SEC as
a broker/dealer and is a member of the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, Inc. (“FINRA”).
6
Table of Contents
Generally, these laws and regulations are intended to benefit shareholders of the funds and
separately managed account clients and grant supervisory agencies and bodies broad administrative
powers, including the power to limit or restrict the Company from carrying on its investment
management and mutual fund underwriting business in the event that it fails to comply with such
laws and regulations. In such event, possible sanctions which may be imposed include the
suspension of individual employees, limitations on engaging in various activities for specified
periods of time, the revocation of broker-dealer or investment adviser registration, and other
censures or fines. The Company continuously monitors legislative, tax, regulatory, accounting and
compliance developments that could impact its business.
Contractual Relationships with the Diamond Hill Funds
The Company is very dependent on its contractual relationships with the Funds. In the event the
Company’s advisory or administration agreements with the Funds are terminated, not renewed, or
amended to reduce fees, the Company would be materially and adversely affected. Generally, these
agreements are terminable by either party upon 60 days written notice without penalty. The
agreements are subject to annual approval by either (i) the board of trustees of the Funds or (ii)
a vote of the majority of the outstanding voting securities of each Fund. The agreements
automatically terminate in the event of their assignment by either the Company or the Fund. The
Company generated approximately 61%, 66% and 69% of its 2011, 2010 and 2009 revenues, respectively,
from its advisory and administrative contracts with the Funds, including 26%, 11%, and 10% from the
advisory contracts with the Diamond Hill Long-Short Fund, Large Cap Fund, and Small Cap Fund,
respectively, during 2011. The loss of the Long-Short Fund, Large Cap Fund, or Small Cap Fund
contracts would have a material adverse effect on the Company. The Company considers its
relationship with the Funds and their board of trustees to be good, and it has no reason to believe
that these advisory or administration contracts will not be renewed in the future; however, there
is no assurance that the Funds will choose to continue their relationships with the Company.
Employees
As of December 31, 2011, the Company and its subsidiaries employed 73 full-time equivalent
employees. As of December 31, 2010, the comparable number was 74. The Company believes that its
relationship with its employees is good and does not anticipate any material change in the number
of employees.
SEC Filings
The Company maintains an Internet website at www.diamond-hill.com. Annual reports on Form 10-K,
quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, XBRL instance documents, current reports on Form 8-K and amendments
to those reports, filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act, are
made available free of charge, on or through the Company’s website, as soon as reasonably
practicable after such material is electronically filed with, or furnished to, the SEC. The
contents of the Company’s website are not incorporated into, or otherwise made a part of, this
Annual Report on Form 10-K.
7
Table of Contents
| ITEM 1A. | Risk Factors |
The
Company’s future results of operations, financial condition, liquidity, and the market price of
the Company’s common shares are subject to various risks, including those mentioned below and those
that are discussed from time-to-time in the Company’s other periodic filings with the SEC.
Investors should carefully consider these risks, along with the other information contained in this
report, before making an investment decision regarding the Company’s common shares. There may be
additional risks of which the Company is currently unaware, or which it currently considers
immaterial. The occurrence of any of these risks could have a material adverse effect on the
Company’s financial condition, results of operations, liquidity, and value of its common shares.
Also see “Forward Looking Statements” within Item 1 of Part I of this Form 10-K.
Poor
investment results of the Company’s products could affect its ability to attract new clients or
reduce the amount of assets under management, potentially negatively impacting revenue and net
income.
If the Company fails to deliver acceptable investment results for its clients, both in the short
and long term, it will likely experience diminished investor interest and potentially a diminished
level of AUM.
The Company’s success depends on its key personnel, and its financial performance could be
negatively affected by the loss of their services.
The Company’s success depends on highly skilled personnel, including portfolio managers, research
analysts, and management, many of whom have specialized expertise and extensive experience in the
investment management industry. Financial services professionals are in high demand, and the
Company faces significant competition for qualified employees. With the exception of the Chief
Executive Officer, key employees do not have employment contracts and generally can terminate their
employment at any time. The Company cannot assure that it will be able to retain or replace key
personnel. In order to retain or replace its key personnel, the Company may be required to increase
compensation, which would decrease net income. The loss of key personnel could damage the Company’s
reputation and make it more difficult to retain and attract new employees and clients. A loss of
client assets resulting from the departure of key personnel would decrease the Company’s revenues
and net income, possibly materially.
The Company’s AUM, which impacts revenue, is subject to significant fluctuations.
Substantially all revenue for the Company is calculated as a percentage of AUM or is based on the
general performance of the equity securities market. A decline in securities prices (such as that
experienced during the last half of 2008 and first quarter of 2009) or in the sale of investment
products, or an increase in fund redemptions, generally would reduce fee income. Financial market
declines would generally negatively impact the level of the Company’s AUM and consequently its
revenue and net income. A recession or other economic or political events, both in the United
States as well as globally, could also adversely impact the Company’s revenue, if such events led
to a decreased demand for products, a higher redemption rate, or a decline in securities prices.
The
investment results and/or the growth in the Company’s AUM may be constrained if appropriate
investment opportunities are not available or if the Company closes
certain of its portfolios.
The Company’s ability to deliver strong investment results depends in large part on its ability to
identify appropriate investment opportunities in which to invest client assets. If the Company is
unable to identify sufficient investment opportunities for existing and new client assets on a
timely basis, its investment results could be adversely affected. The risk that appropriate
investment opportunities may be unavailable is influenced by a number of factors, including general
market conditions, and is likely to increase if the Company’s AUM increases rapidly. In addition,
if the Company determines that sufficient investment opportunities are not available for a
portfolio strategy, or the Company believes that in order to continue to produce attractive returns
from a portfolio, the Company will consider closing the portfolio to new investors. If the Company
misjudges the point at which it would be optimal to close a portfolio, the investment results of
the portfolio could be negatively impacted.
The Company is subject to substantial competition in all aspects of its business.
The Company’s investment products compete against a number of investment products and services
from:
| • | asset management firms; |
|
| • | mutual fund companies; |
|
| • | commercial banks and thrift institutions; |
8
Table of Contents
| • | insurance companies; |
|
| • | hedge funds; and |
|
| • | brokerage and investment banking firms. |
Many of these financial institutions have substantially greater resources than the Company and may
offer a broader range of products or operate in more markets. Some of these institutions operate in
a different regulatory environment, which may give them certain competitive advantages in the
investment products and portfolio structures that they offer. The Company competes with other
providers of investment advisory services primarily based upon its investment philosophy,
performance and client service. Some institutions have proprietary products and distribution
channels that make it more difficult for the Company to compete with them. If current or potential
customers decide to use one of the Company’s competitors, the Company could face a significant
decline in market share, AUM, revenues, and net income. If the Company is required to lower its
fees in order to remain competitive, its net income could be significantly reduced because some of
its expenses are fixed, especially over shorter periods of time, and other expenses may not
decrease in proportion to the decrease in revenues.
The
Company depends on third-party distribution sources to market its portfolios and access its
client base.
The Company’s ability to attract additional assets to manage is dependent on the Company’s access
to third-party intermediaries. The Company gains access to mutual fund investors and some retail
and institutional clients through third parties, including mutual fund platforms and financial
intermediaries. The Company compensates intermediaries for access to investors and for various
services provided. These distribution sources and client bases may not continue to be accessible to
the Company for reasonable terms, or at all. Limiting or the total absence of such access could
have an adverse effect on the Company’s results of operations. The recent economic downturn and
consolidation in the broker-dealer industry may lead to reduced distribution access and increases
in fees the Company is required to pay to intermediaries. If such increased fees should be
required, refusal to pay them could restrict the Company’s access to those client bases while
paying them could adversely affect the Company’s profitability.
A significant portion of the Company’s revenues are based on contracts with the Diamond Hill
Funds that are subject to termination without cause and on short notice.
The Company is very dependent on its contractual relationships with the Funds. In the event the
Company’s advisory or administration agreements with the Funds are terminated, not renewed, or
amended to reduce fees, the Company would be materially and adversely affected. Generally, these
agreements are terminable by either party upon 60 days written notice without penalty. The
agreements are subject to annual approval by either (i) the board of trustees of the Funds or (ii)
a vote of the majority of the outstanding voting securities of each Fund. The agreements
automatically terminate in the event of their assignment by either the Company or the Fund. The
Company generated approximately 61%, 66% and 69% of its 2011, 2010 and 2009 revenues, respectively,
from its advisory and administrative contracts with the Funds, including 26%, 11%, and 10% from the
advisory contracts with the Diamond Hill Long-Short Fund, Large Cap Fund, and Small Cap Fund,
respectively, during 2011. The loss of the Long-Short Fund, Large Cap Fund, or Small Cap Fund
contracts would have a material adverse effect on the Company. The Company considers its
relationship with the Funds and their board of trustees to be good, and it has no reason to believe
that these advisory or administration contracts will not be renewed in the future; however, there
is no assurance that the Funds will choose to continue their relationships with the Company.
Operational risks may disrupt the Company’s business, result in losses or limit the Company’s
growth.
The Company is dependent on the capacity and reliability of the communications, information and
technology systems supporting its operations, whether developed, owned and operated by the Company
or by third parties. Operational risks such as trading or operational errors or interruption of our
financial, accounting, trading, compliance and other data processing systems could result in a
disruption of the Company’s
business, liability to clients, regulatory intervention or reputational damage, and thus adversely
affect the Company’s business.
9
Table of Contents
The Company’s business is subject to substantial governmental regulation.
The Company’s business is subject to a variety of federal securities laws including the Investment
Advisers Act of 1940, the Investment Company Act of 1940, the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and the U.S. Patriot Act of 2001. In addition, the Company is subject
to significant regulation and oversight by the SEC and FINRA. Changes in legal, regulatory,
accounting, tax and compliance requirements could have a significant effect on the Company’s
operations and results, including but not limited to increased expenses and reduced investor
interest in certain funds and other investment products offered by the Company. The Company
continually monitors legislative, tax, regulatory, accounting, and compliance developments that
could impact its business.
The Company will continue to seek to understand, evaluate and when possible, manage and control
these and other business risks.
| ITEM 1B. | Unresolved Staff Comments |
None.
| ITEM 2. | Properties |
The Company leases approximately 25,500 square feet of office space at two locations in
Columbus, Ohio.
The Company does not own any real estate or interests in real estate.
| ITEM 3. | Legal Proceedings |
From time to time, the Company is party to ordinary routine litigation that is
incidental to its business. The Company believes these claims will not have a material adverse
effect on its financial condition, liquidity or results of operations.
| ITEM 4. | Mine Safety Disclosures |
Done.
10
Table of Contents
PART II
| ITEM 5. | Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities |
The following performance graph compares the total shareholder return of an investment in
the Company’s common shares to that of the Russell Microcap® Index, and to a peer group
index of publicly traded asset management firms for the five-year period ending on December 31,
2011. The graph assumes that the value of the investment in the Company’s common shares and each
index was $100 on December 31, 2006. Total return includes reinvestment of all dividends. The
Russell Microcap® Index makes up less than 3% of the U.S. equity market and is a
market-value-weighted index of the smallest 1,000 securities in the small-cap Russell
2000® Index plus the next 1,000 smallest securities. Peer Group returns are weighted by
the market capitalization of each firm at the beginning of the measurement period. The historical
information set forth below is not necessarily indicative of future performance. Diamond Hill does
not make or endorse any predictions as to future stock performance.
| 12/31/2006 | 12/31/2007 | 12/31/2008 | 12/31/2009 | 12/31/2010 | 12/31/2011 | |||||||||||||||||||
Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc. |
100 | 87 | 89 | 102 | 136 | 149 | ||||||||||||||||||
Russell Microcap® Index |
100 | 92 | 55 | 71 | 91 | 83 | ||||||||||||||||||
Peer Group* |
100 | 107 | 39 | 60 | 69 | 53 | ||||||||||||||||||
| * | The following companies are included in the Peer Group: Westwood Holdings Group, Inc.; Epoch
Holding Corp.; Eaton Vance Corp.; Waddell & Reed Financial, Inc.; Federated Investors, Inc.; GAMCO
Investors, Inc.; Affiliated Managers Group, Inc.; Legg Mason, Inc.; U.S. Global Investors, Inc.;
Alliance Bernstein Holding L.P.; Janus Capital Group, Inc.; SEI Investments, Co.; Cohen & Steers,
Inc.; and Calamos Asset Management, Inc. |
11
Table of Contents
The Company’s common shares trade on the NASDAQ Global Select Market under the symbol DHIL.
The following table sets forth the high and low sales prices during each quarter of 2011 and 2010:
| 2011 | 2010 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| High | Low | Dividend | High | Low | Dividend | |||||||||||||||||||
| Price | Price | Per Share | Price | Price | Per Share | |||||||||||||||||||
Quarter ended: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
March 31 |
$ | 80.00 | $ | 67.16 | $ | — | $ | 74.84 | $ | 54.58 | $ | — | ||||||||||||
June 30 |
$ | 82.90 | $ | 77.00 | $ | — | $ | 82.49 | $ | 55.88 | $ | — | ||||||||||||
September 30 |
$ | 84.96 | $ | 65.10 | $ | — | $ | 74.95 | $ | 50.52 | $ | — | ||||||||||||
December 31 |
$ | 81.52 | $ | 60.32 | $ | 5.00 | $ | 86.15 | $ | 68.86 | $ | 13.00 | ||||||||||||
Due to the relatively low volume of traded shares, quoted prices cannot be considered
indicative of any viable market for such shares. During the years ended December 31, 2011 and
2010, approximately 2,429,600 and 2,025,600, respectively, of the Company’s common shares were
traded. The dividends indicated above were special dividends. The Company has not paid regular
quarterly dividends in the past, and has no present intention of paying regular dividends in the
future. The approximate number of registered holders of record of the Company’s common shares at
December 31, 2011 was 238.
Purchases of Equity Securities by the Issuer and Affiliated Purchasers
The Company purchased 15,462 of its common shares during the third quarter of 2011. There were no
other purchases of the Company’s common shares during the year ended December 31, 2011. The
following table sets forth information regarding the Company’s repurchase program of its common
shares during the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2011:
| Cumulative Number | Maximum Number | |||||||||||||||
| of Shares Purchased | of Shares That May | |||||||||||||||
| as part of a Publicly | Yet Be Purchased | |||||||||||||||
| Total Number | Average Price | Announced Plans | Under the Plans or | |||||||||||||
| Period | of Shares Purchased | Paid Per Share | or Programs | Programs (1) | ||||||||||||
October 1, 2011 through October 31, 2011 |
— | — | 31,567 | 318,433 | ||||||||||||
November 1, 2011 through
November 30, 2011 |
— | — | 31,567 | 318,433 | ||||||||||||
December 1, 2011 through
December 31, 2011 |
— | — | 31,567 | 318,433 | ||||||||||||
| (1) | - The Company’s current share repurchase program was announced on August 9, 2007. The
board of directors authorized management to repurchase up to 350,000 shares of its common stock in
the open market and in private transactions in accordance with applicable securities laws. The
Company’s stock repurchase program is not subject to an expiration date. |
12
Table of Contents
| ITEM 6. | Selected Financial Data |
The following selected financial data should be read in conjunction with the Company’s
Consolidated Financial Statements and related notes and Management’s Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
| For the Years Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | ||||||||||||||||
Income Statement Data (in thousands): |
||||||||||||||||||||
Total revenues |
$ | 63,838 | $ | 56,704 | $ | 43,562 | $ | 47,019 | $ | 41,308 | ||||||||||
Compensation and related costs |
32,875 | 30,991 | 24,114 | 26,120 | 20,007 | |||||||||||||||
Other expenses |
7,902 | 7,240 | 7,336 | 7,170 | 7,223 | |||||||||||||||
Total expenses |
40,777 | 38,231 | 31,450 | 33,290 | 27,230 | |||||||||||||||
Net operating income |
23,061 | 18,473 | 12,112 | 13,729 | 14,078 | |||||||||||||||
Net income |
14,353 | 12,402 | 11,374 | 3,276 | 9,932 | |||||||||||||||
Operating profit margin |
36.1 | % | 32.6 | % | 27.8 | % | 29.2 | % | 34.1 | % | ||||||||||
Per Share Information: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Basic earnings |
$ | 4.86 | $ | 4.48 | $ | 4.40 | $ | 1.36 | $ | 4.61 | ||||||||||
Diluted earnings |
4.86 | 4.48 | 4.40 | 1.36 | 4.39 | |||||||||||||||
Cash dividend declared |
5.00 | 13.00 | 10.00 | 10.00 | — | |||||||||||||||
Weighted Average Shares Outstanding |
||||||||||||||||||||
Basic |
2,951,751 | 2,766,741 | 2,582,998 | 2,400,142 | 2,155,829 | |||||||||||||||
Diluted |
2,951,751 | 2,767,895 | 2,587,751 | 2,408,476 | 2,264,234 | |||||||||||||||
| At December 31, | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | ||||||||||||||||
Balance Sheet Data (in thousands): |
||||||||||||||||||||
Total assets |
$ | 37,720 | $ | 28,566 | $ | 40,505 | $ | 44,540 | $ | 53,284 | ||||||||||
Long-term debt |
— | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||
Shareholders equity |
18,050 | 7,498 | 22,981 | 30,246 | 39,308 | |||||||||||||||
Assets Under Management (in millions) |
$ | 8,671 | $ | 8,623 | $ | 6,283 | $ | 4,510 | $ | 4,403 | ||||||||||
Net Client Flows (in millions) |
3 | 1,698 | 579 | 1,977 | 602 | |||||||||||||||
| ITEM 7. | Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
In this section, the Company discusses and analyzes the consolidated results of operations
for the past three fiscal years and other factors that may affect future financial performance.
This discussion should be read in conjunction with the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements,
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, and Selected Financial Data contained in this Form
10-K.
The Company’s revenue is derived primarily from investment advisory and administration fees.
Investment advisory and administration fees paid to the Company are generally based on the value of
the investment portfolios managed by the Company and fluctuate with changes in the total value of
the AUM. Such fees are recognized in the period that the Company manages these assets. The
Company’s primary expense is employee compensation and benefits.
13
Table of Contents
Revenues are highly dependent on both the value and composition of AUM. The following is a summary
of the Company’s AUM by product and a roll-forward of the change in AUM for the years ended
December 31, 2011, 2010, and 2009:
| Assets Under Management by Product | ||||||||||||
| As of December 31, | ||||||||||||
| (in millions) | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||
Mutual funds |
$ | 4,237 | $ | 4,198 | $ | 3,494 | ||||||
Sub-advised funds |
972 | 930 | 146 | |||||||||
Separate accounts |
3,294 | 3,284 | 2,423 | |||||||||
Private investment funds |
168 | 211 | 220 | |||||||||
Total AUM |
$ | 8,671 | $ | 8,623 | $ | 6,283 | ||||||
| For the Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
| (in millions) | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||
AUM at beginning of the year |
$ | 8,623 | $ | 6,283 | $ | 4,510 | ||||||
Net cash inflows (outflows) |
||||||||||||
mutual funds |
77 | 467 | (109 | ) | ||||||||
sub-advised mutual funds |
21 | 714 | 6 | |||||||||
separate accounts |
(74 | ) | 532 | 734 | ||||||||
private investment funds |
(21 | ) | (15 | ) | (52 | ) | ||||||
| 3 | 1,698 | 579 | ||||||||||
Net market appreciation
and income |
45 | 642 | 1,194 | |||||||||
Increase during the year |
48 | 2,340 | 1,773 | |||||||||
AUM at end of the year |
$ | 8,671 | $ | 8,623 | $ | 6,283 | ||||||
Consolidated Results of Operations
The following is a discussion of the consolidated results of operations of the Company and a
detailed discussion of the Company’s revenues and expenses.
| (in thousands, except per share data) | 2011 | 2010 | % Change | 2010 | 2009 | % Change | ||||||||||||||||||
Net operating income |
$ | 23,061 | $ | 18,473 | 25 | % | $ | 18,473 | $ | 12,112 | 53 | % | ||||||||||||
Net operating income after tax(a) |
$ | 14,394 | $ | 11,643 | 24 | % | $ | 11,643 | $ | 7,867 | 48 | % | ||||||||||||
Net income |
$ | 14,353 | $ | 12,402 | 16 | % | $ | 12,402 | $ | 11,374 | 9 | % | ||||||||||||
Net operating income after tax per share(a) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Basic |
$ | 4.88 | $ | 4.21 | 16 | % | $ | 4.21 | $ | 3.05 | 38 | % | ||||||||||||
Diluted |
$ | 4.88 | $ | 4.21 | 16 | % | $ | 4.21 | $ | 3.04 | 38 | % | ||||||||||||
Net income per share |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Basic |
$ | 4.86 | $ | 4.48 | 8 | % | $ | 4.48 | $ | 4.40 | 2 | % | ||||||||||||
Diluted |
$ | 4.86 | $ | 4.48 | 8 | % | $ | 4.48 | $ | 4.40 | 2 | % | ||||||||||||
Operating profit margin |
36.1 | % | 32.6 | % | NM | 32.6 | % | 27.8 | % | NM | ||||||||||||||
| (a) | — Net operating income after tax, which is a non-GAAP performance measure, is reconciled
to net operating income in “Use of Supplemental Data as Non-GAAP Performance Measure” on page 19 of
this report. |
Year Ended December 31, 2011 compared with Year Ended December 31, 2010
The Company posted net income of $14.3 million ($4.86 per diluted share) for the year ended
December 31, 2011, compared with net income of $12.4 million ($4.48 per diluted share) for the year
ended December 31, 2010. While net income increased $1.9 million, revenue for the period increased
$7.1 million offset by a $2.6 million increase in operating expenses, a $1.2 million decrease in
net investment return, and a $1.3 million increase in the income tax provision from 2010 to 2011.
Operating profit margin increased to 36.1% for 2011 from 32.6% for 2010. The Company expects that
its operating margin will fluctuate from year to year based on various factors including revenues;
investment results; employee performance; staffing levels; development of investment strategies,
products, or channels; and industry comparisons.
14
Table of Contents
Year Ended December 31, 2010 compared with Year Ended December 31, 2009
The Company posted net income of $12.4 million ($4.48 per diluted share) for the year ended
December 31, 2010, compared with net income of $11.4 million ($4.40 per diluted share) for the year
ended December 31, 2009. Net income increased $1.0 million due to a $6.4 million increase in
operating income driven by a 37% increase in AUM from 2009 to 2010, offset by a $4.2 million
decrease in the investment return of the Company’s corporate investment portfolio from 2009 to
2010. Operating profit margin increased to 32.6% for 2010 from 27.8% for 2009. The Company
expects that its operating margin will fluctuate from year to year based on various factors
including revenues; investment results; employee performance; staffing levels; development of
investment strategies, products, or channels; and industry comparisons.
Revenue
| (in thousands) | 2011 | 2010 | % Change | 2010 | 2009 | % Change | ||||||||||||||||||
Investment advisory |
$ | 56,016 | $ | 49,249 | 14 | % | $ | 49,249 | $ | 37,472 | 31 | % | ||||||||||||
Mutual fund administration, net |
7,822 | 7,455 | 5 | % | 7,455 | 6,090 | 22 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Total |
63,838 | 56,704 | 13 | % | 56,704 | 43,562 | 30 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Revenue for the Year Ended December 31, 2011 compared with Year Ended December 31, 2010
As a percent of total 2011 revenues, investment advisory fees accounted for 88% and mutual
fund administration fees made up the remaining 12%. This compared to 87% and 13%, respectively,
for 2010.
Investment Advisory Fees. Investment advisory fees increased by $6.8 million, or 14%. Investment
advisory fees are calculated as a percentage of average net AUM at various levels depending on the
investment product. The Company’s average advisory fee rate for 2011 was 0.63% compared to 0.70% in
2010. The decrease in the average advisory fee rate is due to a continued change in the overall
composition of AUM first seen during 2008, where long-short strategies, which pay a higher advisory
fee rate, made up 24% of total AUM as of fourth quarter 2011 compared to 35% of total AUM as of
first quarter 2010 while long only strategies, which pay a lower advisory fee rate, made up 60% of
total AUM as of fourth quarter 2011 compared to 50% of total AUM as of first quarter 2010. Further
contributing to the decrease in the average advisory rate is the large cap fee reduction where the
Company voluntarily lowered the investment advisory fee it charges on the Diamond Hill Large Cap
Fund and certain large cap separate accounts by 0.05% effective October 1, 2011. The large cap
strategy fees were reduced to better align the Company’s investment advisory fees with its
investment management goals. Despite the 0.07% decrease in the average advisory fee rate during
2011 compared to 2010, the fee rate was being charged on a greater asset base as the average AUM
increased 26% during the year compared to 2010 resulting in an increase in the overall fees earned
during 2011. The Company anticipates the average advisory fee rate to continue to decrease
throughout 2012 based upon the full year impact of the large cap strategy fee reduction.
Mutual Fund Administration Fees. Mutual fund administration fees increased $367 thousand, or 5%,
during 2011. Mutual fund administration fees include administration fees received from Diamond
Hill Funds, which are calculated as a percentage of average mutual fund AUM, and all Beacon Hill
fee revenue. The increase in the mutual fund administration fee is due to a 11% increase in
average mutual fund AUM from $3.8 billion for the year ended December 31, 2010 to $4.2 billion for
the year ended December 31, 2011 offset by a
decrease in the overall blended net administration fee rate from 0.17% for the year ended December
31, 2010 to 0.15% for the year ended December 31, 2011.
15
Table of Contents
Revenue for the Year Ended December 31, 2010 compared with Year Ended December 31, 2009
As a percent of total 2010 revenues, investment advisory fees accounted for 87% and mutual
fund administration fees made up the remaining 13%. This compared to 86% and 14%, respectively,
for 2009.
Investment Advisory Fees. Investment advisory fees increased by $11.8 million, or 31%, due to a
43% increase in average AUM from 2009 to 2010. Investment advisory fees are calculated as a
percentage of average net AUM at various levels depending on the investment product. The Company’s
average advisory fee rate for 2010 was 0.70% compared to 0.76% in 2009. The decrease in the average
advisory fee rate is due to a continued change in the overall composition of AUM first seen during
2008, where long-short strategies, which pay a higher advisory fee rate, made up 26% of total AUM
in 2010 compared to 36% of total AUM in 2009 while long only strategies, which pay a lower advisory
fee rate, made up 54% of total AUM in 2010 compared to 42% of total AUM in 2009. Despite the 0.06%
decrease in the average advisory fee rate during 2010 compared to 2009, the fee rate was being
charged on a greater asset base as the average AUM increased 43% during the year compared to 2009
resulting in an increase in the overall fees earned during 2010.
Mutual Fund Administration Fees. Mutual fund administration fees increased $1.4 million, or 22%,
during 2010. Fund administration revenue on the Company’s sponsored Diamond Hill Funds increased
$1.1 million from 2009 to 2010, due in part to a 28% increase in average mutual fund AUM, which was
partially offset by a reduction in the average administration net fee rate from 0.18% in 2009 to
0.17% in 2010. Further contributing to the increase in revenue was a $199 thousand increase in
Beacon Hill’s revenue from 2009 to 2010.
Expenses
| (in thousands) | 2011 | 2010 | % Change | 2010 | 2009 | % Change | ||||||||||||||||||
Compensation and related costs |
$ | 32,875 | $ | 30,991 | 6 | % | $ | 30,991 | $ | 24,114 | 29 | % | ||||||||||||
General and administrative |
4,425 | 3,409 | 30 | % | 3,409 | 3,133 | 9 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Sales and marketing |
1,145 | 854 | 34 | % | 854 | 751 | 14 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Third party distribution |
828 | 1,036 | -20 | % | 1,036 | 1,112 | -7 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Mutual fund administration |
1,504 | 1,941 | -23 | % | 1,941 | 2,340 | -17 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Total |
40,777 | 38,231 | 7 | % | 38,231 | 31,450 | 22 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Expenses for the Year Ended December 31, 2011 compared with Year Ended December 31, 2010
Compensation and Related Costs. Employee compensation and benefits increased by $1.9
million, or 6%, primarily due to an increase of $1.7 million in incentive compensation during 2011
consistent with fluctuations in AUM during the year and the associated increase in operating
income. In addition, salaries and related benefits increased $180 thousand due to increases in the
costs of benefits along with fluctuations in staffing levels during the year.
General and Administrative. General and administrative expenses increased by $1.0 million, or 30%,
from 2010 to 2011. This increase is primarily due to additional research expenses to support the
Company’s investment team, the implementation of new systems and other information technology
expenses, increased product development expenses, and expansion of the Company’s office space.
Sales and Marketing. Sales and marketing expenses increased by $291 thousand, or 34%, from 2010
to 2011. This increase was primarily due to a continued increased presence at industry conferences
and an overall increase in travel and other expenses related to business development and retention
efforts during the year.
16
Table of Contents
Third Party Distribution. Third party distribution expense represents payments made to
intermediaries related to sales of the Company’s investment products. This expense directly
correlated with investments in the Company’s private investment funds. The period over period
increase or decrease directly corresponds to the increase or decrease in investment advisory fees
earned by the Company related to those products.
Mutual Fund Administration. Mutual fund administration expenses decreased by $437 thousand, or
23%, from 2010 to 2011. The majority of mutual fund administration fees are variable based upon the
amount of mutual fund AUM. Despite an overall increase in average mutual fund AUM by 11% from 2010
to 2011, the decrease in mutual fund administration expense was primarily due to third party
service provider fee reduction effective during fourth quarter 2010 and a further fee reduction
during fourth quarter 2011.
Expenses for the Year Ended December 31, 2010 compared with Year Ended December 31, 2009
Compensation and Related Costs. Employee compensation and benefits increased by $6.9
million, or 29%, primarily due to an increase of $3.8 million in incentive compensation during 2010
consistent with an increase in AUM and the associated increase in operating income. Further
contributors to the overall increase in compensation expense were restricted stock expense, which
increased by $718 thousand due to an overall increase in the total amount of long-term equity
awards outstanding in 2010 compared to 2009, and base salaries and related benefits, which
increased $1.3 million due to a 15% increase in employee headcount from 2009 to 2010.
General and Administrative. General and administrative expenses increased by $276 thousand, or
9%, from 2009 to 2010. This increase was primarily due to additional research expenses to support
the Company’s investment team, the full year impact of the expansion of the Company’s office space
and the implementation of a new trading system, which were partially offset by a decrease in legal
costs and a phase-out of the Ohio franchise tax expense.
Sales and Marketing. Sales and marketing expenses increased by $103 thousand, or 14%, from 2009
to 2010. This increase was primarily due to an increased presence at industry conferences and an
increase in travel and other expenses related to business development and retention efforts during
the year.
Third Party Distribution. Third party distribution expense represents payments made to third party
intermediaries directly related to sales made by those parties of the Company’s investment
products. This expense directly correlates with level of sales and AUM in these investment
products. The period over period increase or decrease directly corresponds to the increase or
decrease in investment advisory fees earned by the Company.
Mutual Fund Administration. Mutual fund administration expenses decreased by $399 thousand, or
17%, from 2009 to 2010. The majority of mutual fund administration fees are variable based upon the
amount of mutual fund AUM. Despite an overall increase in average mutual fund AUM by 28% from 2009
to 2010, the decrease in mutual fund administration expense was primarily due to a third party
service provider fee reduction related to bringing certain administration activities in-house.
17
Table of Contents
Beacon Hill Fund Services
Beacon Hill has been staffed with 11 full-time equivalent employees as of December 31, 2011
and 13 full-time equivalent employees as of December 31, 2010, and provides compliance, treasurer,
and other fund administration services to mutual fund clients and their investment advisers. In
addition, through its registered broker/dealer, Beacon Hill also serves as the underwriter for a
number of mutual funds. The following is a summary of Beacon Hill’s results for the year ended
December 31, 2011 compared to 2010 and 2009, excluding 12b-1 / service fees and commission revenue
and expenses, which net to zero:
| For the Year Ended | ||||||||||||
| December 31, | ||||||||||||
| (in thousands) | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||
Revenue1 |
$ | 1,789 | $ | 1,588 | $ | 1,024 | ||||||
Expenses |
2,259 | 2,128 | 1,661 | |||||||||
Net loss |
$ | (470 | ) | $ | (540 | ) | $ | (637 | ) | |||
| 1 | Beacon Hill’s 2011, 2010, and 2009 revenue includes $517 thousand, $512
thousand, and $146 thousand, respectively, of inter-company revenue earned from services
provided to DHCM. These amounts have been eliminated from the Consolidated Statements of
Income. |
Liquidity and Capital Resources
The Company’s entire investment portfolio is in readily marketable securities, which provide
for cash liquidity, if needed. Investments in mutual funds are valued at their quoted current net
asset value. Investments in private investment funds are valued independently based on readily
available market quotations. Inflation is expected to have no material impact on the Company’s
performance.
As of December 31, 2011, the Company had working capital of approximately $14.0 million compared to
$4.9 million at December 31, 2010. Working capital includes cash, securities owned and accounts
receivable, net of all liabilities. On December 1, 2011, the Company’s board of directors declared
a $5 per share dividend payable on December 19, 2011 to shareholders of record on December 12,
2011. The payment of the special cash dividend reduced the Company’s working capital balance. The
Company has no debt, and believes its available working capital is sufficient to cover current
expenses. The Company does not expect any material capital expenditures during 2012.
The Company has paid out special dividends totaling $38 per share from 2008 through 2011. These
special dividends in total reduced shareholders’ equity by $102 million over the past four years.
The 2011 special dividend reduced shareholders’ equity by $14.9 million. It was a qualified
dividend for tax purposes and was recorded as a reduction of retained earnings, which contributed
to the accumulated deficit of $20.4 million as of December 31, 2011. The Company’s accumulated
deficit is not expected to impact its future ability to operate given its continuing profitability
and strong cash and financial position. The 2010 special dividend reduced shareholders’ equity by
$36.3 million and was recorded through retained earnings generating an accumulated deficit of $19.8
million as of December 31, 2010. The 2009 special dividend reduced shareholders’ equity by $26.2
million and was recorded through retained earnings. A portion of the 2010 and 2009 dividend was a
return of capital for tax purposes and the Company elected to record each dividend as a reduction
of retained earnings. The 2008 special dividend reduced shareholders’ equity by $24.4 million and
was recorded through common stock as 100% of this dividend represented a return of capital to
shareholders.
Operating activities during 2011 provided cash flows of $21.8 million, including net income of
$14.3 million, compared to cash flows of $25.1 million in 2010, including net income of $12.4
million. Net cash provided by investing activities totaled $2.9 million, compared to net cash
provided in investing activities of $4.6 million in 2010. Capital spending for property and
equipment increased to $253 thousand in 2011, an increase of $191 thousand from 2010, and proceeds
from the sales of investments decreased to $4.1 million in 2011, a decrease of $1.9 million from
2010. Net cash used in financing activities was $15.2 million in 2011, compared to net cash used by
financing activities of $35.5 million in 2010. Cash used in financing activities in 2011 consists
of $14.9 million special dividend payment and $1.0 million in common stock repurchases, offset by
proceeds from common stock issuances compared to a $36.3 million special dividend payment in 2010
being offset by proceeds from common stock issuances. There were no common stock repurchases
during 2010.
18
Table of Contents
Operating activities during 2010 provided cash flows of $25.1 million, up $8.1 million from 2009,
including an increase in net income of $1.0 million, an increase in the change in non-cash stock
based compensation expense of $718 thousand, an increase in the change in accounts receivable of
$6.3 million, an increase in the change in investment gain/loss of $4.2 million, and an increase in
the change in accrued liabilities of $1.1 million, offset by a decrease in the change in deferred
taxes of $1.8 million, and a decrease in the change in other assets and liabilities of $3.4
million. Net cash provided in investing activities totaled $4.6 million,
compared to net cash provided in investing activities of $4.2 million in 2009. Capital spending
for property and equipment decreased to $63 thousand in 2010, a decrease of $542 thousand from
2009, and proceeds from the sales of investments decreased to $6.1 million in 2010, a decrease of
$7.9 million from 2009. Net cash used by financing activities was $35.5 million in 2010, compared
to net cash used by financing activities of $25.5 million in 2009. Cash used by financing
activities in 2010 consists of $36.3 million special dividend payment offset by proceeds from
common stock issuances.
Selected Quarterly Information
Unaudited quarterly results of operations for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010 is
summarized below:
| At or For the Quarter Ended | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2011 | 2010 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| (in thousands, except per share data) | 12/31 | 09/30 | 06/30 | 03/31 | 12/31 | 09/30 | 06/30 | 03/31 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Assets under management
(in millions) |
$ | 8,671 | $ | 7,719 | $ | 9,186 | $ | 9,250 | $ | 8,623 | $ | 7,080 | $ | 6,482 | $ | 6,876 | ||||||||||||||||
Total revenue |
15,190 | 15,370 | 16,828 | 16,450 | 15,516 | 14,043 | 13,754 | 13,391 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total operating expenses |
8,873 | 9,926 | 10,977 | 11,001 | 9,272 | 9,844 | 9,652 | 9,462 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Operating income |
6,317 | 5,444 | 5,851 | 5,449 | 6,244 | 4,199 | 4,102 | 3,929 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investment return |
781 | (1,309 | ) | 90 | 371 | 974 | 1,170 | (1,184 | ) | 245 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Net income |
$ | 4,453 | $ | 2,539 | $ | 3,729 | $ | 3,632 | $ | 4,464 | $ | 3,438 | $ | 1,830 | $ | 2,670 | ||||||||||||||||
Diluted EPS |
$ | 1.49 | $ | 0.84 | $ | 1.26 | $ | 1.28 | $ | 1.60 | $ | 1.24 | $ | 0.66 | $ | 0.98 | ||||||||||||||||
Diluted shares outstanding |
2,994 | 3,006 | 2,967 | 2,838 | 2,794 | 2,779 | 2,774 | 2,721 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Contractual Obligations
The following table presents a summary of the Company’s future obligations under the terms
of an operating lease and other contractual purchase obligations at December 31, 2011. Other
purchase obligations include contractual amounts that will be due for the purchase of services to
be used in the Company’s operations such as mutual fund sub-administration and portfolio accounting
software. These obligations may be cancelable at earlier times than those indicated and, under
certain conditions, may involve termination fees. Because these obligations are of a normal
recurring nature, the Company expects that it will fund them from future cash flows from
operations. The information presented does not include operating expenses or capital expenditures
that will be committed in the normal course of operations in 2012 and future years:
| Payments Due by Period | ||||||||||||||||||||
| (in thousands) | Total | 2012 | 2013-2014 | 2015-2016 | Later | |||||||||||||||
Operating lease obligations |
$ | 1,889 | $ | 440 | $ | 814 | $ | 635 | $ | — | ||||||||||
Purchase obligations |
4,545 | 2,142 | 2,387 | 16 | — | |||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 6,434 | $ | 2,582 | $ | 3,201 | $ | 651 | $ | — | ||||||||||
Use of Supplemental Data as Non-GAAP Performance Measure
Net Operating Income After Tax
As supplemental information, we are providing performance measures that are based on
methodologies other than generally accepted accounting principles (“non-GAAP”) for “Net Operating
Income After Tax” that management uses as benchmarks in evaluating and comparing the
period-to-period operating performance of the Company and its subsidiaries.
19
Table of Contents
The Company defines “net operating income after tax” as the Company’s net operating income less
income tax provision excluding investment return and the tax impact related to the investment
return. The Company believes that “net operating income after tax” provides a good representation
of the Company’s operating performance, as it excludes the impact of investment return on financial
results. The amount of the investment portfolio and market fluctuations on the investments can
change significantly from one period to another, which can distort the underlying earnings
potential of a company. We also believe “net operating income after tax” is an important metric in
estimating the value of an asset management business. This non-GAAP measure is provided in addition
to net income and net operating income and is not a substitute for net income or net operating
income and may not be comparable to non-GAAP performance measures of other companies.
| Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
| (in thousands, except per share data) | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||
Net operating income, GAAP basis |
$ | 23,061 | $ | 18,473 | $ | 12,112 | ||||||
Non-GAAP adjustments: |
||||||||||||
Tax provision excluding impact of investment return |
8,667 | 6,830 | 4,245 | |||||||||
Net operating income after tax, non-GAAP basis |
$ | 14,394 | $ | 11,643 | $ | 7,867 | ||||||
Net operating income after tax per basic share,
non-GAAP basis |
$ | 4.88 | $ | 4.21 | $ | 3.05 | ||||||
Net operating income after tax per diluted share,
non-GAAP basis |
$ | 4.88 | $ | 4.21 | $ | 3.04 | ||||||
Basic weighted average shares outstanding, GAAP basis |
2,952 | 2,767 | 2,583 | |||||||||
Diluted weighted average shares outstanding, GAAP basis |
2,952 | 2,768 | 2,588 | |||||||||
The tax provision excluding impact of investment return is calculated by applying the tax
rate calculated from the income statement to net operating income.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
The Company has no off-balance sheet arrangements. It does not have any obligation under a
guarantee contract, or a retained or contingent interest in assets or similar arrangement that
serves as credit, liquidity or market risk support for such assets, or any other obligation,
including a contingent obligation, under a contract that would be accounted for as a derivative
instrument or arising out of a variable interest.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
Provisions for Income Taxes. The objectives of accounting for income taxes are to recognize
the amount of taxes payable or refundable for the current year and deferred tax liabilities and
assets for the future tax consequences of events that have been recognized in an entity’s financial
statements or tax returns. Judgment is required in assessing the future tax consequences of events
that have been recognized in the Company’s financial statements or tax returns.
Revenue Recognition on Incentive-Based Advisory Contracts. The Company has certain investment
advisory contracts in which a portion of the fees are based on investment performance achieved in
the respective client portfolio in excess of a specified hurdle rate. For management fees based on
a formula, there are two methods by which incentive revenue may be recorded. Under “Method 1,”
incentive fees are recorded at the end of the contract year. Under “Method 2,” incentive fees are
recorded periodically and calculated as the amount that would be due under the formula at any point
in time as if the contract was terminated at that date. Management has chosen the more conservative
Method 1, in which performance fees are recorded at the end of the contract period provided for by
the contract terms.
Revenue Recognition when Acting as an Agent vs. Principal. The Funds have selected and
contractually engaged certain vendors to fulfill various services to benefit the Funds’
shareholders or to satisfy regulatory requirements of the Funds. These services include, among
others, required fund shareholder mailings, registration fees, legal and audit fees. DHCM, in
fulfilling a portion of its role under the administration agreement with the Funds, acts as agent
to pay these obligations of the Funds. Each vendor is independently
responsible for fulfillment of the services it has been engaged to provide and negotiates fees and
terms with the management and board of trustees of the Funds. The fee that the Funds pay to DHCM
is reviewed annually by the Funds’ board of trustees and specifically takes into account the
contractual expenses that DHCM pays on behalf of the Funds. As a result, DHCM is not involved in
the delivery or pricing of these services and bears no risk related to these services. Revenue has
been recorded net of these Fund expenses, as it is the appropriate accounting treatment for this
agency relationship.
20
Table of Contents
Beacon Hill has underwriting agreements with certain clients, including registered mutual funds.
Part of Beacon Hill’s role as underwriter is to act as an agent on behalf of its mutual fund
clients to receive 12b-1/service fees and commission revenue and facilitate the payment of those
fees and commissions to third parties who provide services to the funds and their shareholders. The
amount of 12b-1/service fees and commissions are determined by each mutual fund client and Beacon
Hill bears no financial risk related to these services. As a result, 12b-1/service fees and
commission revenue has been recorded net of the expense payments to third parties, as it is the
appropriate accounting treatment for this agency relationship.
| ITEM 7A. | Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk |
The Company’s revenues and net income are based primarily on the value of AUM. Accordingly,
declines in financial market values directly and negatively impact the Company’s investment
advisory revenues and net income.
The Company invests in Diamond Hill Funds and its private investment funds, which are market risk
sensitive financial instruments. These investments have inherent market risk in the form of equity
price risk; that is, the potential future loss of value that would result from a decline in their
fair value. The bond fund is also subject to market risk which may arise from changes in equity
prices, credit ratings and interest rates. Market prices fluctuate and the amount realized upon
subsequent sale may differ significantly from the reported market value.
The table below summarizes the Company’s market risks as of December 31, 2011, and shows the
effects of a hypothetical 10% increase and decrease in equity and bond investments.
| Fair Value Assuming | Fair Value Assuming | |||||||||||
| Fair Value as of | a Hypothetical 10% | a Hypothetical 10% | ||||||||||
| December 31, 2011 | Increase | Decrease | ||||||||||
Equity investments |
$ | 8,011,205 | $ | 8,812,326 | $ | 7,210,085 | ||||||
Bond investments |
197,284 | 217,012 | 177,556 | |||||||||
Total |
$ | 8,208,489 | $ | 9,029,338 | $ | 7,387,641 | ||||||
21
Table of Contents
| ITEM 8. | Financial Statements and Supplementary Data |
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The Shareholders and Board of Directors of
Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc.:
Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc.:
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc.
and its subsidiaries as of December 31, 2011 and 2010, and the related consolidated statements of
income, shareholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended
December 31, 2011. We also have audited the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as
of December 31, 2011, based on criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework
issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Management
is responsible for these financial statements, for maintaining effective internal control over
financial reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial
reporting, included in the accompanying financial statements. Our responsibility is to express an
opinion on these financial statements and an opinion on the company’s internal control over
financial reporting based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight
Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement and
whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material
respects. Our audits of the financial statements included examining, on a test basis, evidence
supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting
principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial
statement presentation. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining
an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material
weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal
control based on the assessed risk. Our audits also included performing such other procedures as we
considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis
for our opinions.
A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable
assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial
statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A
company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1)
pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the
transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that
transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance
with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company
are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company;
and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized
acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the
financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or
detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are
subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that
the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all
material respects, the financial position of Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc. and its
subsidiaries as of December 31, 2011 and 2010, and the consolidated results of its operations and
its cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2011 in conformity
with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Also in our opinion,
Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc. maintained, in all material respects, effective internal
control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2011, based on criteria
established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring
Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).
/s/ Plante & Moran, PLLC
Columbus, Ohio
March 7, 2012
Columbus, Ohio
March 7, 2012
22
Table of Contents
Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc.
Consolidated Balance Sheets
Consolidated Balance Sheets
| December 31, | ||||||||
| 2011 | 2010 | |||||||
ASSETS |
||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 15,242,768 | $ | 5,775,526 | ||||
Investment portfolio |
8,208,489 | 11,527,060 | ||||||
Accounts receivable |
10,295,723 | 8,695,103 | ||||||
Prepaid expenses |
920,460 | 787,033 | ||||||
Furniture and equipment, net of depreciation, and other assets |
829,781 | 907,670 | ||||||
Income tax receivable |
139,696 | — | ||||||
Deferred taxes |
2,083,402 | 873,474 | ||||||
Total assets |
$ | 37,720,319 | $ | 28,565,866 | ||||
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY |
||||||||
Liabilities |
||||||||
Accounts payable and accrued expenses |
$ | 2,895,504 | $ | 3,432,868 | ||||
Accrued incentive compensation |
16,774,457 | 16,779,461 | ||||||
Income tax payable |
— | 855,285 | ||||||
Total liabilities |
19,669,961 | 21,067,614 | ||||||
Commitments and contingencies |
— | — | ||||||
Shareholders’ Equity |
||||||||
Common stock, no par value
7,000,000 shares authorized;
2,995,814 issued and outstanding at December 31, 2011; 2,795,683 issued and outstanding at December 31, 2010 |
49,995,622 | 34,423,011 | ||||||
Preferred stock, undesignated, 1,000,000 shares
authorized and unissued |
— | — | ||||||
Deferred compensation |
(11,539,632 | ) | (7,137,729 | ) | ||||
Retained earnings/(Accumulated deficit) |
(20,405,632 | ) | (19,787,030 | ) | ||||
Total shareholders’ equity |
18,050,358 | 7,498,252 | ||||||
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity |
$ | 37,720,319 | $ | 28,565,866 | ||||
Book value per share |
$ | 6.03 | $ | 2.68 | ||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
23
Table of Contents
Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Income
| Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
| 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | ||||||||||
REVENUES: |
||||||||||||
Investment advisory |
$ | 56,016,708 | $ | 49,248,586 | $ | 37,472,407 | ||||||
Mutual fund administration, net |
7,821,766 | 7,455,537 | 6,089,979 | |||||||||
Total revenue |
63,838,474 | 56,704,123 | 43,562,386 | |||||||||
OPERATING EXPENSES: |
||||||||||||
Compensation and related costs |
32,874,606 | 30,990,572 | 24,113,631 | |||||||||
General and administrative |
4,425,031 | 3,408,981 | 3,133,359 | |||||||||
Sales and marketing |
1,145,229 | 853,851 | 751,040 | |||||||||
Third party distribution |
828,490 | 1,036,231 | 1,112,460 | |||||||||
Mutual fund administration |
1,504,005 | 1,941,160 | 2,339,544 | |||||||||
Total operating expenses |
40,777,361 | 38,230,795 | 31,450,034 | |||||||||
NET OPERATING INCOME |
23,061,113 | 18,473,328 | 12,112,352 | |||||||||
Investment return |
(66,664 | ) | 1,205,194 | 5,398,636 | ||||||||
INCOME BEFORE TAXES |
22,994,449 | 19,678,522 | 17,510,988 | |||||||||
Income tax provision |
(8,641,481 | ) | (7,276,081 | ) | (6,137,045 | ) | ||||||
NET INCOME |
$ | 14,352,968 | $ | 12,402,441 | $ | 11,373,943 | ||||||
Earnings per share |
||||||||||||
Basic |
$ | 4.86 | $ | 4.48 | $ | 4.40 | ||||||
Diluted |
$ | 4.86 | $ | 4.48 | $ | 4.40 | ||||||
Weighted average shares outstanding |
||||||||||||
Basic |
2,951,751 | 2,766,741 | 2,582,998 | |||||||||
Diluted |
2,951,751 | 2,767,895 | 2,587,751 | |||||||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
24
Table of Contents
Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’ Equity
| Shares | Common | Deferred | Retained Earnings | |||||||||||||||||
| Outstanding | Stock | Compensation | (Accumulated Deficit) | Total | ||||||||||||||||
Balance at January 1, 2009 |
2,447,299 | $ | 16,233,501 | $ | (4,908,215 | ) | $ | 18,920,601 | $ | 30,245,887 | ||||||||||
Issuance of restricted stock grants |
78,092 | 4,836,595 | (4,836,595 | ) | — | — | ||||||||||||||
Amortization of restricted stock grants |
— | — | 1,674,113 | — | 1,674,113 | |||||||||||||||
Issuance of stock grants |
135,313 | 5,032,290 | — | — | 5,032,290 | |||||||||||||||
Issuance of common stock related to
401k plan match |
15,610 | 758,459 | — | — | 758,459 | |||||||||||||||
Tax benefit from equity transactions |
— | 134,741 | — | — | 134,741 | |||||||||||||||
Payment of taxes withheld related
to vested restricted stock grants |
(2,737 | ) | (140,602 | ) | — | — | (140,602 | ) | ||||||||||||
Exercise of options/warrants for
common stock |
4,000 | 67,500 | — | — | 67,500 | |||||||||||||||
Dividend Paid of $10.00 per share |
— | — | — | (26,165,624 | ) | (26,165,624 | ) | |||||||||||||
Net income |
— | — | — | 11,373,943 | 11,373,943 | |||||||||||||||
Balance at December 31, 2009 |
2,677,577 | $ | 26,922,484 | $ | (8,070,697 | ) | $ | 4,128,920 | $ | 22,980,707 | ||||||||||
Issuance of restricted stock grants |
20,753 | 1,458,898 | (1,458,898 | ) | — | — | ||||||||||||||
Amortization of restricted stock grants |
— | — | 2,391,866 | — | 2,391,866 | |||||||||||||||
Issuance of stock grants |
83,611 | 5,182,983 | — | — | 5,182,983 | |||||||||||||||
Issuance of common stock related
to 401k plan match |
13,631 | 897,842 | — | — | 897,842 | |||||||||||||||
Tax benefit from equity transactions |
— | 84,375 | — | — | 84,375 | |||||||||||||||
Payment of taxes withheld related
to vested restricted stock grants |
(1,889 | ) | (146,071 | ) | — | — | (146,071 | ) | ||||||||||||
Exercise of options/warrants
for common stock |
2,000 | 22,500 | — | — | 22,500 | |||||||||||||||
Cash Dividend Paid of $13.00 per share |
— | — | — | (36,318,391 | ) | (36,318,391 | ) | |||||||||||||
Net income |
— | — | — | 12,402,441 | 12,402,441 | |||||||||||||||
Balance at December 31, 2010 |
2,795,683 | $ | 34,423,011 | $ | (7,137,729 | ) | $ | (19,787,030 | ) | $ | 7,498,252 | |||||||||
Issuance of restricted stock grants |
109,333 | 8,686,586 | (8,686,586 | ) | — | — | ||||||||||||||
Amortization of restricted stock grants |
— | — | 3,742,909 | — | 3,742,909 | |||||||||||||||
Issuance of stock grants |
103,899 | 7,691,800 | — | — | 7,691,800 | |||||||||||||||
Issuance of common stock related
to 401k plan match |
12,754 | 960,888 | — | — | 960,888 | |||||||||||||||
Tax benefit from equity transactions |
— | 7,007 | — | — | 7,007 | |||||||||||||||
Payment of taxes withheld related
to vested restricted stock grants |
(2,025 | ) | (158,988 | ) | — | — | (158,988 | ) | ||||||||||||
Forfeiture of restricted stock grants |
(8,368 | ) | (541,774 | ) | 541,774 | — | — | |||||||||||||
Repurchase of common stock |
(15,462 | ) | (1,072,908 | ) | — | — | (1,072,908 | ) | ||||||||||||
Cash Dividend Paid of $5.00 per share |
— | — | — | (14,971,570 | ) | (14,971,570 | ) | |||||||||||||
Net income |
— | — | — | 14,352,968 | 14,352,968 | |||||||||||||||
Balance at December 31, 2011 |
2,995,814 | $ | 49,995,622 | $ | (11,539,632 | ) | $ | (20,405,632 | ) | $ | 18,050,358 | |||||||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
25
Table of Contents
Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
| Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
| 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | ||||||||||
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES: |
||||||||||||
Net Income |
$ | 14,352,968 | $ | 12,402,441 | $ | 11,373,943 | ||||||
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash
provided by (used in) operating activities: |
||||||||||||
Depreciation on furniture and equipment |
330,971 | 326,529 | 268,572 | |||||||||
Stock-based compensation |
3,972,725 | 2,571,702 | 1,854,187 | |||||||||
(Increase) decrease in accounts receivable |
(1,600,620 | ) | 1,448,901 | (4,804,446 | ) | |||||||
Change in deferred income taxes |
(1,221,328 | ) | (382,227 | ) | 1,438,658 | |||||||
Investment gain/loss, net |
111,078 | 167,495 | (4,055,840 | ) | ||||||||
Increase in accrued liabilities |
6,919,616 | 8,449,814 | 7,323,481 | |||||||||
Other changes in assets and liabilities |
(1,110,001 | ) | 148,913 | 3,599,790 | ||||||||
Net cash provided by operating activities |
21,755,409 | 25,133,568 | 16,998,345 | |||||||||
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES: |
||||||||||||
Purchase of furniture and equipment |
(253,082 | ) | (62,529 | ) | (604,928 | ) | ||||||
Cost of investments purchased and other portfolio activity |
(925,507 | ) | (1,314,588 | ) | (9,149,453 | ) | ||||||
Proceeds from sale of investments |
4,133,000 | 6,050,000 | 13,960,937 | |||||||||
Net cash provided by investing activities |
2,954,411 | 4,672,883 | 4,206,556 | |||||||||
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES: |
||||||||||||
Payment for repurchase of common shares |
(1,072,908 | ) | — | — | ||||||||
Payment of taxes withheld on employee stock transactions |
(158,988 | ) | (146,071 | ) | (140,602 | ) | ||||||
Proceeds from common stock issuance |
960,888 | 920,343 | 825,959 | |||||||||
Payment of dividends |
(14,971,570 | ) | (36,318,391 | ) | (26,165,624 | ) | ||||||
Net cash used in financing activities |
(15,242,578 | ) | (35,544,119 | ) | (25,480,267 | ) | ||||||
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS |
||||||||||||
Net change during the year |
9,467,242 | (5,737,668 | ) | (4,275,366 | ) | |||||||
At beginning of year |
5,775,526 | 11,513,194 | 15,788,560 | |||||||||
At end of year |
$ | 15,242,768 | $ | 5,775,526 | $ | 11,513,194 | ||||||
Supplemental cash flow information: |
||||||||||||
Interest paid |
$ | — | $ | — | $ | — | ||||||
Income taxes paid |
10,849,000 | 7,444,300 | 2,625,900 | |||||||||
Supplemental disclosure of non-cash transactions: |
||||||||||||
Common stock issued as incentive compensation |
7,461,984 | 5,003,146 | 4,852,216 | |||||||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
26
Table of Contents
Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 1 Business and Organization
Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc. (the “Company”) derives its consolidated revenues and
net income primarily from investment advisory and fund administration services. The Company has
four operating subsidiaries.
Diamond Hill Capital Management, Inc. (“DHCM”), an Ohio corporation, is a wholly owned subsidiary
of the Company and a registered investment adviser. DHCM is the investment adviser to the Diamond
Hill Funds (the “Funds”), a series of open-end mutual funds, private investment funds (“Private
Funds”), and also offers advisory services to institutional and individual investors.
Diamond Hill GP (Cayman) Ltd. (“DHGP”) was incorporated in the Cayman Islands as an exempted
company on May 18, 2006 for the purpose of acting as the general partner of a Cayman Islands
exempted limited partnership. This limited partnership acts as a master fund for Diamond Hill
Offshore Ltd., a Cayman Islands exempted company; and Diamond Hill Investment Partners II, L.P.,
an Ohio limited partnership. DHGP has no operating activity.
Beacon Hill Fund Services, Inc. (“BHFS”), an Ohio corporation, is a wholly owned subsidiary of the
Company incorporated on January 29, 2008. BHFS provides certain compliance, treasury, and fund
administration services to mutual fund companies. BHIL Distributors, Inc. (“BHIL”), an Ohio
corporation, is a wholly owned subsidiary of BHFS incorporated on February 19, 2008. BHIL provides
underwriting and distribution services to mutual fund companies. BHFS and BHIL collectively
operate as Beacon Hill.
Note 2 Significant Accounting Policies
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions
that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the reported amounts of revenues
and expenses for the periods. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Certain prior
year amounts and disclosures have been reclassified to conform to the current year financial
presentation. Book value per share is computed by dividing total shareholders’ equity by the
number of shares issued and outstanding at the end of the measurement period. The following is a
summary of the Company’s significant accounting policies:
Principles of Consolidation
The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the operations of the Company and its
subsidiaries. All material inter-company transactions and balances have been eliminated in
consolidation.
Segment Information
Management has determined that the Company operates in one business segment, namely providing
investment management and administration services to mutual funds, separate accounts, and private
investment funds. Therefore, no disclosures relating to operating segments are required in annual
or interim financial statements.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents include demand deposits and money market funds.
27
Table of Contents
Note 2 Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)
Accounts Receivable
Accounts receivable are recorded when they are due and are presented in the balance sheet, net of
any allowance for doubtful accounts. Accounts receivable are written off when they are determined
to be uncollectible. Any allowance for doubtful accounts is estimated based on the Company’s
historical losses, existing conditions in the industry, and the financial stability of those
individuals or entities that owe the receivable. No allowance for doubtful accounts was deemed
necessary at December 31, 2011 or 2010.
Valuation of Investment Portfolio
Investments held by the Company are valued based upon the definition of Level 1 inputs and Level 2
inputs. Level 1 inputs are defined as fair values which use quoted prices in active markets for
identical assets or liabilities that the Company has the ability to access. Level 2 inputs are
defined as quoted prices in markets that are not considered to be active for identical assets or
liabilities, quoted prices in active markets for similar assets or liabilities, and inputs other
than quoted prices that are directly observable or indirectly through corroboration with
observable market data. The following table summarizes the Company’s investments valued based
upon Level 1 and Level 2 inputs as of December 31, 2011 and 2010:
| As of December 31, | ||||||||
| 2011 | 2010 | |||||||
Level 1 Inputs |
$ | 1,230,560 | $ | 1,265,998 | ||||
Level 2 Inputs |
6,977,929 | 10,261,062 | ||||||
Level 1 investments are all registered investment companies (mutual funds). Level 2
investments are all limited partnerships. There have been no transfers in or out of the levels.
The changes in market values on the investments are recorded in the Consolidated Statements of
Income as investment returns.
Limited Partnership Interests
DHCM is the managing member of Diamond Hill General Partner, LLC, the General Partner of Diamond
Hill Investment Partners, LP (“DHIP”), Diamond Hill Investment Partners II, LP (“DHIP II”),
Diamond Hill Research Partners, LP (“DHRP”), and Diamond Hill Research Partners — International,
LP (“DHRPI”), collectively (the “Partnerships”), each a limited partnership whose underlying
assets consist of marketable securities.
DHCM, in its role as managing member of the General Partner, has the power to direct the
Partnerships’ economic activities and the right to receive investment advisory and performance
incentive fees that are significant to the Partnerships. The Partnerships are subject to
investment company accounting and, as a result, they have not been consolidated in presenting the
accompanying financial statements. DHCM’s investments in these partnerships are reported as a
component of the Company’s investment portfolio, valued at DHCM’s proportionate interest in the
net asset value of the marketable securities held by the Partnerships. Gains and losses
attributable to changes in the value of DHCM’s interests in the Partnerships are included in the
Company’s reported investment return.
The Company’s exposure to loss as a result of its involvement with the Partnerships is limited to
the amount of its investments. DHCM is not obligated to provide financial or other support to the
Partnerships, other than its investments to date and its contractually provided investment
advisory responsibilities, and has not provided such support. The Company has not provided
liquidity arrangements, guarantees or other commitments to support the Partnerships’ operations,
and the Partnerships’ creditors and interest holders have no recourse to the general credit of the
Company.
28
Table of Contents
Note 2 Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)
Limited Partnership Interests (Continued)
Several board members, officers and employees of the Company invest in DHIP, DHIP II, and DHRP
through Diamond Hill General Partner, LLC. These individuals receive no remuneration as a result
of their personal investment in the Partnerships. The capital of Diamond Hill General Partner,
LLC is not subject to a management fee or an incentive fee.
Furniture and Equipment
Furniture and equipment, consisting of computer equipment, furniture, and fixtures, are carried at
cost less accumulated depreciation. Depreciation is calculated using the straight-line method
over estimated lives of three to seven years.
Revenue Recognition — General
The Company earns substantially all of its revenue from investment advisory and fund
administration services. Mutual fund investment advisory and administration fees, generally
calculated as a percentage of assets under management, are recorded as revenue as services are
performed. Managed account and private investment fund clients provide for monthly or quarterly
management fees, in addition to quarterly or annual performance fees.
Revenue Recognition — Performance Incentive Revenue
The Company’s private investment funds and certain managed accounts provide for performance
incentive fees. For management fees based on a formula, there are two methods by which incentive
revenue may be recorded. Under “Method 1,” incentive fees are recorded at the end of the contract
period; under “Method 2,” the incentive fees are recorded periodically and calculated as the
amount that would be due under the formula at any point in time as if the contract was terminated
at that date. Management has chosen Method 1, in which incentive fees are recorded at the end of
the contract period for the specific client in which the incentive fee applies. The table below
shows assets under management (“AUM”) subject to performance incentive fees and the performance
incentive fees as calculated under each of the above methods:
| As Of December 31, | ||||||||||||
| 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | ||||||||||
AUM — Contractual Period Ends Quarterly |
$ | 89,070,421 | $ | 108,671,900 | $ | 108,974,458 | ||||||
AUM — Contractual Period Ends Annually |
81,362,029 | 175,231,841 | 196,469,025 | |||||||||
Total AUM Subject to Performance Incentive |
$ | 170,432,450 | $ | 283,903,741 | $ | 305,443,483 | ||||||
| For The Year Ending December 31, | ||||||||||||
| 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | ||||||||||
Performance Incentive Fees — Method 1 |
$ | 2,597 | $ | 217,588 | $ | 1,050,895 | ||||||
Performance Incentive Fees — Method 2 |
2,597 | 217,588 | 1,262,922 | |||||||||
29
Table of Contents
Note 2 Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)
Revenue Recognition — Mutual Fund Administration
DHCM has an administrative and transfer agency services agreement with the Funds, under which DHCM
performs certain services for each fund. These services include mutual fund administration,
transfer agency and other related functions. For performing these services, each fund compensates
DHCM a fee, which is calculated using the following annual rates times the average daily net
assets of each respective series and share class:
| Prior to February 28, | After February 28, | |||||||
| 2011 | 2011 | |||||||
Class A and Class C |
0.30 | % | 0.26 | % | ||||
Class I |
0.19 | % | 0.24 | % | ||||
The Funds have selected and contractually engaged certain vendors to fulfill various
services to benefit the Funds’ shareholders or to satisfy regulatory requirements of the Funds.
These services include, among others, required fund shareholder mailings, federal and state
registrations, legal and audit. DHCM, in fulfilling a portion of its role under the
administration agreement with the Funds, acts as agent to pay these obligations of the Funds.
Each vendor is independently responsible for fulfillment of the services it has been engaged to
provide and negotiates fees and terms with the management and board of trustees of the Funds. The
fee that the Funds pay to DHCM is reviewed annually by the Funds’ board of trustees and
specifically takes into account the contractual expenses that DHCM pays on behalf of the Funds.
As a result, DHCM is not involved in the delivery or pricing of these services and bears no risk
related to these services. Revenue has been recorded net of these Fund related expenses, as it is
the appropriate accounting treatment for this agency relationship. In addition, DHCM finances the
upfront commissions which are paid by the Fund’s principal underwriter to brokers who sell Class C
shares of the Funds. As financer, DHCM advances to the underwriter the commission amount to be
paid to the selling broker at the time of sale. These advances are capitalized and amortized over
12 months to correspond with the repayments DHCM receives from the principal underwriter to recoup
this commission advancement.
Beacon Hill has underwriting and administrative service agreements with certain clients, including
registered mutual funds. The fee arrangements vary from client to client based upon services
provided and are recorded as revenue under Mutual Fund Administration on the Consolidated
Statements of Income. Part of Beacon Hill’s role as underwriter is to act as an agent on behalf of
its mutual fund clients to receive 12b-1/service fees and commission revenue and facilitate the
payment of those fees and commissions to third parties who provide services to the funds and their
shareholders. The amount of 12b-1/service fees and commissions are determined by each mutual fund
client and Beacon Hill bears no financial risk related to these services. As a result,
12b-1/service fees and commission revenue have been recorded net of the expense payments to third
parties as it is the appropriate accounting treatment for this agency relationship.
30
Table of Contents
Note 2 Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)
Revenue Recognition — Mutual Fund Administration (Continued)
Mutual fund administration gross and net revenue are summarized below:
| Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
| 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | ||||||||||
Mutual fund administration: |
||||||||||||
Administration revenue, gross |
$ | 11,617,140 | $ | 10,940,041 | $ | 9,257,464 | ||||||
12b-1/service fees and commission
revenue received from fund clients |
7,058,471 | 8,122,268 | 5,260,383 | |||||||||
12b-1/service fees and commission
expense payments to third parties |
(7,058,471 | ) | (8,122,268 | ) | (5,260,383 | ) | ||||||
Fund related expense |
(3,830,977 | ) | (3,554,156 | ) | (3,141,229 | ) | ||||||
Revenue, net of fund related expenses |
7,786,163 | 7,385,885 | 6,116,235 | |||||||||
DHCM C-Share financing: |
||||||||||||
Broker commission advance repayments |
352,740 | 619,490 | 763,383 | |||||||||
Broker commission amortization |
(317,137 | ) | (549,838 | ) | (789,639 | ) | ||||||
Financing activity, net |
35,603 | 69,652 | (26,256 | ) | ||||||||
Mutual fund administration revenue, net |
$ | 7,821,766 | $ | 7,455,537 | $ | 6,089,979 | ||||||
Third Party Distribution Expense
Third party distribution expenses are earned by various third party financial services firms based
on sales and/or assets of the Company’s investment products generated by the respective firms.
Expenses recognized represent actual payments made to the third party firms and are recorded in
the period earned based on the terms of the various contracts.
Income Taxes
The Company accounts for income taxes through an asset and liability approach. A net deferred tax
asset or liability is determined based on the tax effects of the various temporary differences
between the book and tax bases of the various balance sheet assets and liabilities and gives
current recognition to changes in tax rates and laws.
The Company has analyzed its tax positions taken on federal income tax returns for all open tax
years (tax years ended December 31, 2008 through 2011) to determine any uncertainty in income
taxes and has recognized no adjustment in the net asset or liability.
Earnings Per Share
Basic earnings per share (“EPS”) excludes dilution and is computed by dividing net income by the
weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted EPS reflects the
potential dilution of EPS that could occur if options and warrants were exercised. At December
31, 2011, there were no options or warrants outstanding.
31
Table of Contents
Note 3 Investment Portfolio
As of December 31, 2011, the Company held investments worth $8.2 million and an estimated
cost basis of $5.3 million. The following table summarizes the market value of these investments
for the last two fiscal years:
| As of December 31, | ||||||||
| 2011 | 2010 | |||||||
Diamond Hill Small Cap Fund |
$ | 189,042 | $ | 211,301 | ||||
Diamond Hill Small-Mid Cap Fund |
203,571 | 217,915 | ||||||
Diamond Hill Large Cap Fund |
213,110 | 210,413 | ||||||
Diamond Hill Select Fund |
214,833 | 221,491 | ||||||
Diamond Hill Long-Short Fund |
212,720 | 206,312 | ||||||
Diamond Hill Strategic Income Fund |
197,284 | 198,566 | ||||||
Diamond Hill Investment Partners, L.P. |
156,122 | 1,177,098 | ||||||
Diamond Hill Investment Partners II, L.P. |
131,203 | 1,155,022 | ||||||
Diamond Hill Research Partners, L.P. |
5,770,874 | 7,928,942 | ||||||
Diamond Hill Research Partners — International, L.P. |
919,730 | — | ||||||
Total Investment Portfolio |
$ | 8,208,489 | $ | 11,527,060 | ||||
DHCM is the managing member of the Diamond Hill General Partner LLC, which is the General
Partner of the Partnerships. The underlying assets of the Partnerships are cash and marketable
equity securities. Summary financial information, including the Company’s carrying value and
income from the Partnerships is as follows:
| As of December 31, | ||||||||||||
| 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | ||||||||||
Total partnership assets |
$ | 130,880,368 | $ | 173,007,238 | $ | 188,716,374 | ||||||
Total partnership liabilities |
21,570,822 | 32,855,190 | 40,583,059 | |||||||||
Net partnership assets |
109,309,546 | 140,152,048 | 148,133,315 | |||||||||
DHCM’s portion of net assets |
6,977,929 | 10,261,062 | 12,321,797 | |||||||||
| For the Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
| 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | ||||||||||
Net partnership income (loss) |
(11,007,617 | ) | 4,486,719 | 35,193,357 | ||||||||
DHCM’s portion of net income (loss) |
(75,082 | ) | 939,265 | 4,634,391 | ||||||||
DHCM’s income from the Partnerships includes its pro-rata capital allocation and its share
of an incentive allocation, if any, from the limited partners.
Note 4 Capital Stock
Common Shares
The Company has only one outstanding class of securities, Common Shares.
Authorization of Preferred Shares
The Company’s Articles of Incorporation authorize the issuance of 1,000,000 shares of “blank
check” preferred shares with such designations, rights and preferences, as may be determined from
time to time by
the Company’s Board of Directors. The Board of Directors is authorized, without shareholder
approval, to issue preferred stock with dividend, liquidation, conversion, voting, or other
rights, which could adversely affect the voting or other rights of the holders of the Common
Shares. There were no shares of preferred stock issued or outstanding at December 31, 2011 or
December 31, 2010.
32
Table of Contents
Note 5 Stock-Based Compensation
Equity Incentive Plans
2011 Equity and Cash Incentive Plan
At the Company’s annual shareholder meeting on April 26, 2011, shareholders approved the 2011
Equity and Cash Incentive Plan (“2011 Plan”). The 2011 Plan is intended to facilitate the
Company’s ability to attract and retain staff, provide additional incentive to employees,
directors and consultants, and promote the success of the Company’s business. The 2011 Plan
authorizes the issuance of 600,000 Common Shares of the Company in various forms of equity awards.
As of December 31, 2011, there were 493,125 Common Shares available for issuance under the 2011
Plan. The 2011 Plan provides that the Board of Directors, or a committee appointed by the Board,
may grant awards and otherwise administer the 2011 Plan. Restricted stock grants issued under
the 2011 Plan, which vest over time, are recorded as deferred compensation in the equity section
of the balance sheet on the grant date and then recognized as compensation expense based on the
grant date price over the vesting period of the respective grant.
2005 Employee and Director Equity Incentive Plan
At the Company’s annual shareholder meeting on May 12, 2005, shareholders approved the 2005
Employee and Director Equity Incentive Plan (“2005 Plan”). With the approval of the 2011 Plan,
there are no longer any Common Shares available for future issuance under the 2005 Plan.
Outstanding grants under the 2005 Plan are unaffected and remain issued and outstanding.
Restricted stock grants issued under the 2005 Plan, which vest over time, are recorded as deferred
compensation in the equity section of the balance sheet on the grant date and then recognized as
compensation expense based on the grant date price over the vesting period of the respective
grant.
Restricted Stock Grant Transactions
The following table represents a roll-forward of outstanding restricted stock grants issued
pursuant to the 2011 and 2005 Plans and related activity during the year ended December 31, 2011:
| Weighted-Average | ||||||||
| Grant Date Price | ||||||||
| Shares | per Share | |||||||
Outstanding restricted stock grants as of December 31, 2010 |
164,832 | $ | 69.72 | |||||
Granted to Employees |
109,333 | 79.45 | ||||||
Grants Vested |
(5,176 | ) | 78.85 | |||||
Grants Forfeited |
(8,368 | ) | 64.74 | |||||
Outstanding restricted stock grants as of December 31, 2011 |
260,621 | $ | 73.78 | |||||
Total deferred compensation related to unvested restricted stock grants was $11,539,632 as
of December 31, 2011. Expense recognition of deferred compensation over the remaining vesting
periods is as follows:
| 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | Total | |||||||||||||||||||
| $ | 3,683,502 | $ | 3,086,139 | $ | 2,782,304 | $ | 1,908,382 | $ | 79,305 | $ | 11,539,632 | |||||||||||||
33
Table of Contents
Note 5 Stock-Based Compensation (Continued)
401(k) Plan
The Company sponsors a 401(k) plan in which all employees participate. Employees may
contribute a portion of their compensation subject to certain limits based on federal tax laws.
The Company makes matching contributions of Common Shares of the Company with a value equal to 200
percent of the first six percent of an employee’s compensation contributed to the plan. Employees
become fully vested in the matching contributions after six plan years of employment. The
following table summarizes the Company’s expenses attributable to the plan during the years ended
December 31, 2011, 2010, and 2009:
| For the year ended December 31, | ||||||||||
| 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | ||||||||
| $ | 960,888 | $ | 897,843 | $ | 758,459 | |||||
Stock Options and Warrants
The Company recognizes all share-based payments to employees and directors, including
grants of stock options, as expense in the income statement based on their fair values. The amount
of compensation is measured at the fair value of the options when granted, and this cost is
expensed over the required service period, which is normally the vesting period of the options.
There were no stock options outstanding during the periods presented in these financial
statements. There were no warrants outstanding as of December 31, 2011 and 2010.
Warrant transactions during the periods presented in these financial statements are summarized
below:
| Warrants | ||||||||
| Weighted Average | ||||||||
| Shares | Exercise Price | |||||||
Oustanding December 31, 2008 |
10,000 | $ | 13.00 | |||||
Exercisable December 31, 2008 |
10,000 | $ | 13.00 | |||||
Granted |
— | — | ||||||
Expired / Forfeited |
— | |||||||
Exercised |
4,000 | 16.88 | ||||||
Oustanding December 31, 2009 |
6,000 | $ | 10.42 | |||||
Exercisable December 31, 2009 |
6,000 | $ | 10.42 | |||||
Granted |
— | — | ||||||
Expired / Forfeited |
4,000 | 10.00 | ||||||
Exercised |
2,000 | 11.25 | ||||||
Oustanding December 31, 2010 |
— | $ | — | |||||
Exercisable December 31, 2010 |
— | $ | — | |||||
34
Table of Contents
Note 6 Operating Leases
The Company leases approximately 25,500 square feet of office space at two locations. The
following table summarizes the total lease and operating expenses for the years ended December 31,
2011, 2010, and 2009:
| For the year ended December 31, | ||||||||||
| 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | ||||||||
| $ | 620,360 | $ | 573,218 | $ | 501,209 | |||||
The approximate future minimum lease payments under the operating leases are as follows:
| 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | ||||||||||||||
| $ | 440,000 | $ | 417,000 | $ | 397,000 | $ | 401,000 | $ | 234,000 | |||||||||
In addition to the above rent, the Company is also responsible for normal operating
expenses of the properties. Such operating expenses were approximately $9.60 per square foot in
2011, on a combined basis, and are expected to be approximately $9.69 per square foot in 2012.
Note 7 Income Taxes
The Company files a consolidated Federal income tax return. It is the policy of the Company to
allocate the consolidated tax provision to subsidiaries as if each subsidiary’s tax liability or
benefit were determined on a separate company basis. As part of the consolidated group,
subsidiaries transfer to the Company their current Federal tax liability or assets.
| As of December 31, | ||||||||||||
| 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | ||||||||||
Current city income tax provision |
$ | 658,106 | $ | 514,076 | $ | 266,711 | ||||||
Current state income tax provision |
271,776 | 147,642 | 44,000 | |||||||||
Current federal income tax provision |
8,921,527 | 6,966,872 | 4,358,283 | |||||||||
Deferred federal income tax provision (benefit) |
(1,209,928 | ) | (352,509 | ) | 1,468,051 | |||||||
Provision for income taxes |
$ | 8,641,481 | $ | 7,276,081 | $ | 6,137,045 | ||||||
A reconciliation of income tax expense at the statutory federal rate to the Company’s
income tax expense is as follows:
| 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | ||||||||||
Income tax computed at statutory rate |
$ | 8,048,057 | $ | 6,887,483 | $ | 5,990,509 | ||||||
City and state income taxes, net of federal benefit |
604,423 | 430,117 | 204,417 | |||||||||
Other |
(10,999 | ) | (41,519 | ) | (57,881 | ) | ||||||
Income tax expense |
$ | 8,641,481 | $ | 7,276,081 | $ | 6,137,045 | ||||||
Deferred tax assets and liabilities consist of the following at December 31, 2011 and 2010:
| 2011 | 2010 | |||||||
Stock-based compensation |
$ | 2,629,271 | $ | 1,462,094 | ||||
Unrealized (gains) losses |
(441,092 | ) | (1,205,681 | ) | ||||
Capital loss carry forward |
— | 677,770 | ||||||
Other assets and liabilities |
(104,777 | ) | (60,709 | ) | ||||
Net deferred tax assets |
$ | 2,083,402 | $ | 873,474 | ||||
35
Table of Contents
Note 8 Earnings Per Share
The following table sets forth the computation for basic and diluted earnings per share
(“EPS”):
| Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
| 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | ||||||||||
Basic and Diluted net income |
$ | 14,352,968 | $ | 12,402,441 | $ | 11,373,943 | ||||||
Weighted average number of outstanding shares |
||||||||||||
Basic |
2,951,751 | 2,766,741 | 2,582,998 | |||||||||
Diluted |
2,951,751 | 2,767,895 | 2,587,751 | |||||||||
Earnings per share |
||||||||||||
Basic |
$ | 4.86 | $ | 4.48 | $ | 4.40 | ||||||
Diluted |
$ | 4.86 | $ | 4.48 | $ | 4.40 | ||||||
Note 9 Regulatory Requirements
BHIL, a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company and principal underwriter for mutual funds, is
subject to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) uniform net capital rule, which
requires the maintenance of minimum net capital. BHIL’s net capital exceeded its minimum net
capital requirement at December 31, 2011 and 2010. The net capital balances, minimum net capital
requirements, and ratio of aggregate indebtedness to net capital for BHIL are summarized below as
of December 31, 2011 and 2010:
| Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||
| 2011 | 2010 | |||||||
Net Capital |
$ | 360,167 | $ | 86,107 | ||||
Minimum Net Capital Requirement |
38,139 | 50,440 | ||||||
Ratio of Aggregate Indebtedness
to Net Capital |
1.59 to 1 | 8.79 to 1 | ||||||
Note 10 Commitments and Contingencies
The Company indemnifies its directors and certain of its officers and employees for certain
liabilities that might arise from their performance of their duties to the Company. Additionally,
in the normal course of business, the Company enters into agreements that contain a variety of
representations and warranties and which provide general indemnifications. Certain agreements do
not contain any limits on the Company’s liability and would involve future claims that may be made
against the Company that have not yet occurred. Therefore, it is not possible to estimate the
Company’s potential liability under these indemnities. Further, the Company maintains insurance
policies that may provide coverage against certain claims under these indemnities.
36
Table of Contents
| ITEM 9. | Changes In and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosures |
None.
| ITEM 9A. | Controls and Procedures |
Management, including the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer, has
conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures
(as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) or 15d-15(e) of the Exchange Act of 1934) as of the end of the
period covered by this report (the “Evaluation Date”). Based on such evaluation, the Chief
Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer have concluded that, as of the Evaluation Date,
the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures are effective to ensure that the information
required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange
Act, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s
rules and forms, and to ensure that the information required to be disclosed by the Company in the
reports it files or submits under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to the Company’s
management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, or persons
performing similar functions, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required
disclosure.
There have been no changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting during the
year ended December 31, 2011 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially
affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.
Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
Management of Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc. (the “Company”) is responsible for
establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as defined in Rule
13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) of the Exchange Act. The Company’s internal control over financial
reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of
financial reporting and the preparation of its consolidated financial statements for external
purposes in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or
detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are
subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that
the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
Under the supervision and with the participation of the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief
Financial Officer, management assessed the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over
financial reporting as of December 31, 2011 based on criteria established in Internal Control —
Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission
(COSO). Based on this assessment, management concluded that the Company’s internal control over
financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2011.
The Company’s independent registered public accounting firm, Plante & Moran, PLLC, has audited the
Company’s 2011 and 2010 consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report on Form
10-K and the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2011, and has
issued its Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm on Consolidated Financial
Statements, which is included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
37
Table of Contents
| ITEM 9B. | Other Information |
None.
PART III
| ITEM 10. | Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance |
Information required by this Item 10 is incorporated herein by reference from the Company’s
definitive proxy statement for its 2012 annual meeting of shareholders to be filed with the SEC
pursuant to Regulation 14A of the Exchange Act (the “2012 Proxy Statement”), under the captions:
“Proposal 1 — Election of Directors”, “Executive Officers and Compensation Information”,
“Corporate Governance”, and “Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance”.
| ITEM 11. | Executive Compensation |
Information required by this Item 11 is incorporated herein by reference from the Company’s
2012 Proxy Statement under the captions: “Executive Officers and Compensation Information” and
“Corporate Governance”.
| ITEM 12. | Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters |
The following table sets forth certain information concerning our equity compensation plans
at December 31, 2011:
Equity Compensation Plan Information
| (a) | (b) | (c) | ||||||||||
| Number of securities | ||||||||||||
| remaining available for | ||||||||||||
| Number of securities to | future issuance under | |||||||||||
| be issued upon the | Weighted-average | equity compensation | ||||||||||
| exercise of outstanding | exercise price of | plans (excluding | ||||||||||
| options, warrants and | outstanding options, | securities reflected in | ||||||||||
| Plan category | rights | warrants and rights | column (a)) | |||||||||
Equity compensation plans approved
by security holders |
— | $ | — | 493,125 | 1 | |||||||
| 1 | This amount relates to common shares that may be issued under our 2011 Equity and Cash
Incentive Plan. |
The other information required by this Item 12 is incorporated herein by reference from the
Company’s 2012 Proxy Statement under the captions: “Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial
Owners and Management” and “Executive Officers and Compensation Information”.
38
Table of Contents
| ITEM 13. | Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence |
Information required by this Item 13 is incorporated herein by reference from the Company’s
2012 Proxy Statement under the caption: “Corporate Governance”.
| ITEM 14. | Principal Accounting Fees and Services |
Information required by this Item 14 is incorporated herein by reference from the Company’s
2012 Proxy Statement under the caption: “Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm”.
39
Table of Contents
PART IV
| ITEM 15. | Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules |
| (a) | (1) | Financial Statements: See “Part II. Item 8, Financial Statements and
Supplementary Data”. |
| (2) | Financial Statement Schedules: All financial statement schedules for which
provision is made in the applicable accounting regulations of the SEC are omitted because
they are not required or the required information is included in the accompanying financial
statements or notes thereto. |
||
| (3) | Exhibits: |
| 3.1 | Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation of the Company.
(Incorporated by reference from Exhibit 3(i) to the Current Report
on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on May 7, 2002; File No.
000-24498.) |
|||
| 3.2 | Regulations of the Company. (Incorporated by reference from
Exhibit 3(ii) to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC
on May 7, 2002; File No. 000-24498.) |
|||
| 10.1 | Amended and Restated Investment Management Agreement between
Diamond Hill Capital Management, Inc. and the Diamond Hill Funds
dated as of November 17, 2011. (Incorporated by reference from
Exhibit d to Post-Effective Amendment Nos. 36 and 37 to
Registration Statement on Form N1-A (File Nos. 333-22075 and
811-08061) filed by Diamond Hill Funds on February 29, 2012) |
|||
| 10.2 | Amended and Restated Administrative and Transfer Agency Services
Agreement dated as of May 31, 2002, as amended November 17, 2011,
between Diamond Hill Capital Management, Inc. and the Diamond Hill
Funds. (Incorporated by reference from Exhibit h(i) to
Post-Effective Amendment Nos. 36 and 37 to Registration Statement
on Form N1-A (File Nos. 333-22075 and 811-08061) filed by Diamond
Hill Funds on February 29, 2012) |
|||
| 10.3* | 2011 Equity and Cash Incentive Plan and Form of Restricted Stock
Award Agreement referenced therein. (Incorporated by reference
from Exhibit 10.2 and 10.3 to Form 8-K filed with the SEC on April
29, 2011; File No. 000-24498.) |
|||
| 10.4* | Amended and Restated Employment Agreement between the Company and
Roderick H. Dillon, Jr. dated March 22, 2011. (Incorporated by
reference from Exhibit 10.1 to Form 8-K filed with the SEC on
March 24, 2011; File No. 000-24498.) |
|||
| 10.5* | Amended and Restated 2005 Employee and Director Equity Incentive
Plan. (Incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.6 to Form 10-K
filed with the SEC on March 14, 2008; File No. 000-24498.) |
|||
| 10.6* | 2005 Employee and Director Equity Incentive Plan First Amendment
dated November 2, 2010 and Form of Restricted Stock Agreement
reference therein. (Incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.4 to
Form 10-K filed with the SEC on February 25, 2011; File No.
000-24498.) |
|||
| 14.1 | Amended Code of Business Conduct and Ethics. (Incorporated by
reference from Exhibit 14.1 to Form 10-K filed with the SEC on
March 13, 2009; File No. 000-24498.) |
|||
| 21.1 | Subsidiaries of the Company. (Filed herewith) |
|||
| 23.1 | Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm, Plante &
Moran, PLLC. (Filed herewith) |
|||
| 31.1 | Certification of Chief Executive Officer required by Rule
13a-14(a) or Rule 15d-14(a). (Filed herewith) |
|||
| 31.2 | Certification of Chief Financial Officer required by Rule
13a-14(a) or Rule 15d-14(a). (Filed herewith) |
|||
| 32.1 | Section 1350 Certifications. (Furnished herewith) |
|||
| 101.ins | XBRL Instance Document. |
|||
| 101.xsd | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document. |
|||
| 101.cal | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document. |
|||
| 101.def | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document. |
|||
| 101.lab | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document. |
|||
| 101.pre | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document. |
|||
| * | Denotes management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement. |
| (b) | Exhibits: Reference is made to Item 15(a)(3) above. |
|
| (c) | Financial Statement Schedules: None required. |
40
Table of Contents
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
registrant has caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized:
| DIAMOND HILL INVESTMENT GROUP, INC. | ||||||
By:
|
/S/ R. H. Dillon | |||||
| R. H. Dillon, President, Chief Executive Officer and a Director | March 9, 2012 | |||||
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed
below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates
indicated.
| Signature | Title | Date | ||
/S/ R. H. Dillon
|
President, Chief Executive Officer, | March 9, 2012 | ||
R. H. Dillon |
and a Director | |||
/S/ James F. Laird
|
Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer, | March 9, 2012 | ||
James F. Laird
|
Secretary, and a Director | |||
/S/ Gary R. Young
|
Controller | March 9, 2012 | ||
Gary R. Young |
||||
/S/ Lawrence E. Baumgartner
|
Director | March 9, 2012 | ||
Lawrence E. Baumgartner |
||||
/S/ David P. Lauer
|
Director | March 9, 2012 | ||
David P. Lauer |
||||
/S/ Peter J. Moran III
|
Director | March 9, 2012 | ||
Peter J. Moran III |
||||
/S/ Donald B. Shackelford
|
Director | March 9, 2012 | ||
Donald B. Shackelford |
||||
/S/ Frances A. Skinner
|
Director | March 9, 2012 | ||
Frances A. Skinner |
41