As Seen On TV, Inc. - FORM 10-Q

Attached files

file	filename
EXCEL - IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT - As Seen On TV, Inc.	Financial_Report.xls
EX-31.2 - CERTIFICATION - As Seen On TV, Inc.	hnhi_ex31z2.htm
EX-32.1 - CERTIFICATION - As Seen On TV, Inc.	hnhi_ex32z1.htm
EX-32.2 - CERTIFICATION - As Seen On TV, Inc.	hnhi_ex32z2.htm
EX-31.1 - CERTIFICATION - As Seen On TV, Inc.	hnhi_ex31z1.htm

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

———————

FORM 10-Q

———————


þ	QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
	ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended: December 31, 2011
Or

¨	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
	ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from: _____________ to _____________

Commission File Number: 000-53539

———————

As Seen On TV, Inc.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

———————


Florida	80-149096
(State or other jurisdiction	(I.R.S. Employer
of incorporation or organization)	Identification No.)

14044 Icot Boulevard, Clearwater, Florida 33760

(Address of Principal Executive Office) (Zip Code)

(727) 288-2738

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

———————


Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was
required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.					þ	Yes	¨	No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
					þ	Yes	¨	No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company.

Large accelerated filer	¨			Accelerated filer			¨
Non-accelerated filer	¨	(Do not check if a smaller		Smaller reporting company			þ
		reporting company)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
					¨	Yes	þ	No

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.
Class			Shares Outstanding as of February14, 2012
Common Stock, $0.0001 Par Value Per Share			31,970,784

As Seen On TV, Inc. and Subsidiaries

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Page

Number

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1.

Financial Statements

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2011 (Unaudited)

March 31, 2011

Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations (Unaudited) for the three month and

and nine month periods ending December 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010

Condensed Consolidated Statement of Stockholders' Equity/(Deficiency) (Unaudited for

the period April 1, 2011 to December 31, 2010

Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows (Unaudited) for the nine month periods ending

December 31, 20011 and December 31, 2010

Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows (Continued)

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

Item 2.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Item 3.

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

Item 4.

Controls And Procedures

PART II. OTHER FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

Item 3.

Defaults Upon Senior Securities

Item 4.

(Removed And Reserved)

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1.

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

AS SEEN ON TV, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS


	December 31, 2011			March 31, 2011
	(Unaudited)

ASSETS
Current Assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	7,097,285		$	35,502
Accounts receivable, net		1,146,572			82,238
Advances on inventory purchases		2,134,298			—
Inventories		1,485,639			1,107
Deferred offering costs		—			63,500
Prepaid expenses and other current assets		394,597			46,370
Total current assets		12,258,391			228,717

Investments, at cost		150,000			150,000
Property, plant and equipment, net		149,148			92,732
Deposit on asset acquisition		719,192			—

Total Assets	$	13,276,731		$	471,449
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (DEFICIENCY)
Current Liabilities:
Accounts payable	$	1,316,670		$	332,833
Notes payable officer		—			91,219
Deferred revenue		68,250			88,652
Accrued interest related parties		1,284			2,354
Accrued registration rights penalty		156,000			156,000
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities		309,434			108,326
Notes Payable – Current Portion		47,342			9,714
Warrant liability		30,838,629			4,117,988
Total current liabilities		32,737,609			4,907,086

Commitments and contingencies

Stockholders' equity (deficiency):
Preferred stock, $.0001 par value; 10,000,000 shares authorized; no shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2011 and March 31, 2011, respectively.		—			—
Common stock, $.0001 par value; 750,000,000 shares authorized at December 31, 2011 and 400,000,000 shares authorized at March 31, 2011, respectively, and; 31,970,784 and 10,886,374 issued and outstanding at December 31, 2011 and March 31, 2011, respectively.		3,197			1,089
Additional paid-in capital		—			3,460,597
Accumulated deficit		(19,464,075	)		(7,897,323	)
Total stockholders' equity (deficiency)		(19,460,878	)		(4,435,637	)

Total liabilities and stockholders' equity (deficiency)	$	13,276,731		$	471,449

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements

AS SEEN ON TV, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS

(UNAUDITED)


	Three Months Ended December 31,						Nine Months Ended December 31,
	2011			2010			2011			2010

Revenues	$	2,606,034		$	391,710		$	3,350,417		$	848,941
Cost of revenues		1,409,310			587,309			1,917,947			1,168,583

Gross profit (loss)		1,196,724			(195,599	)		1,432,470			(319,642	)

Operating expenses:
Selling and marketing expenses		1,762,583			—			1,941,886			—
General and administrative expenses		1,367,264			1,039,664			3,167,795			2,868,897

Loss from operations		(1,933,123	)		(1,235,263	)		(3,677,211	)		(3,188,539	)


Other (income) expense:
Warrant revaluation		(5,977,192	)		(278,113	)		(411,421	)		(2,121,288	)
Loss of extinguishment of debt		—			—			2,950,513			—
Revaluation of derivative liability		—			—			(209,351	)		—
Registration rights penalty		—			—			—			75,000
Interest income - related party		—			(2,340	)		—			(10,440	)
Other (income) expense		(8,039	)		4,090			(9,465	)		(23,602	)
Interest expenses - notes payable		1,806,014			339			4,180,688			66,145
Interest expense - related party		1,070			20,233			23,271			44,939
		(4,178,147	)		(255,791	)		6,524,235			(1,969,246	)

Income/(loss) before income taxes		2,245,024			(979,472	)		(10,201,446	)		(1,219,293	)

Provision for income taxes		—			—			—			—

Net income/(loss)	$	2,245,024		$	(979,472	)	$	(10,201,446	)	$	(1,219,293	)

Income/ (loss) per common share:
Basic	$	(0.09	)	$	(0.10	)	$	(0.62	)	$	(0.13	)
Diluted	$	(0.08	)	$	(0.10	)	$	(0.62	)	$	(0.13	)
Weighted-average number of common shares outstanding:
Basic		26,179,515			10,187,700			16,358,756			9,679,038
Diluted		28,707,965			10,187,700			16,358,756			9,679,038

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements

AS SEEN ON TV, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY/(DEFICIENCY)

FOR THE PERIOD FROM APRIL 1, 2011 THROUGH DECEMBER 31, 2011

(UNAUDITED)


	Common Shares, $.0001 Par Value Per Share			Additional Paid-In Capital			Accumulated Deficit			Total
	Shares Issued	Amount		Additional Paid-In Capital			Accumulated Deficit			Total

Balance April 1, 2011	10,886,374	$	1,089	$	3,460,597		$	(7,897,323	)	$	(4,435,637	)

Common shares issued for services	16,849		2		183,998			—			184,000

Warrants issued for services	—		—		135,207			—			135,207

Common stock issued in Private Placement, net of offering costs of $255,900	292,500		29		914,071			—			914,100

Common shares issued in Unit offering net of Offering costs of $1,605,747	15,625,945		1,563		10,892,690						10,894,253

Placement Agent consideration For Unit offering	100,000		10		(10	)		—			—

Common shares issued on conversion of notes payable in Unit offering	4,041,563		404		4,980,359						4,980,763

Warrants issued in Unit offering					(26,282,119	)		(1,365,306	)		(27,647,425	)

Common shares issued on conversion of related party note payable	133,750		13		106,987						107,000

Share-based compensation	—		—		283,199			—			283,199

Cashless exercise of Placement Agent warrants	331,303		33		3,594,402			—			3,594,435

Shares issued under repricing agreement	292,500		29		(29	)		—			—

Warrants issued on deposit of Asset acquisition	—		—		162,192			—			162,192

Common shares issued on deposit of assets acquisition	250,000		25		499,975			—			500,000

Warrants issued with convertible note	—		—		811,447			—			811,447

Beneficial conversion feature on note payable	—		—		243,711			—			243,711

Settlement of derivative liability	—		—		13,323			—			13,323

Net loss	—		—		—			(10,201,446	)		(10,201,446	)

Balance December 31, 2011	31,970,784	$	3,197	$	—		$	(19,464,075	)	$	(19,460,878	)

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements

AS SEEN ON TV, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS

(UNAUDITED)


	Nine Months Ended December 31,
	2011			2010
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income/(loss)	$	(10,201,446	)	$	(1,219,293	)

Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:
Depreciation of property, plant and equipment		36,101			13,817
Amortization of discount on convertible debt		1,993,650			—
Amortization of deferred financing costs		2,149,491			—
Warrants issued for services		135,207			—
Share-based compensation		283,199			450,264
Interest accretion in related party note payable		15,781			34,585
Shares issued for consulting services		184,000			328,500
Change in fair value of warrants		(411,421	)		(2,121,288	)
Accrued interest income – related party		—			(10,440	)
Accrued registration penalty		—			75,000
Change in derivative liability		(209,351	)		—
Loss on extinguishment of debt		2,950,513			—
Accrued interest-related party		(1,070	)		33

Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable		(1,064,334	)		(61,183	)
Deposits towards inventory purchases		(2,134,298	)		—
Inventories, net		(1,484,532	)		7,151
Deferred production costs		—			(19,413	)
Prepaid expenses and other current assets		(348,227	)		(42,733	)
Accounts payable		983,836			129,122
Deferred revenue		(20,402	)		13,550
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities		300,489			22,247
Net cash used in operating activities		(6,842,815	)		(2,400,081	)

Cash flows from investing activities:
Investments		—			(582,100	)
Deposit on asset acquisition		(57,000	)		—
Reverse recapitalization transaction		—			(320,000	)
Additions to property, plant and equipment		(92,517	)		(77,907	)
Net cash used in investing activities		(149,517	)		(980,007	)

Cash flows from financing activities:
Proceeds from issuance of convertible debt		2,550,000			—
Costs associated with convertible debt		(342,586	)		—
Proceeds of notes payable		82,694			27,295
Repayment of notes payable		(44,346	)		(58,721	)
Loans from related parties		—			(513	)
Proceeds from private placement of common stock		13,670,000			3,825,000
Costs associated with private placement		(1,861,647	)		(349,437	)
Net cash provided by financing activities		14,054,115			3,443,624

Net increase in cash and cash equivalents		7,061,783			63,536

Cash and cash equivalents - beginning of period		35,502			74,991
Cash and cash equivalents - end of period	$	7,097,285		$	138,527

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements

AS SEEN ON TV, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS (CONTINUED)

(UNAUDITED)


	Nine Months Ended December 31,
	2011		2010
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information
Interest paid in cash	$	9,507	$	93,884
Taxes paid in cash		—		—
Non Cash Investing and Financing Activities
Common shares issued towards settlement of notes payable		107,000	$	687,500
Common shares issued in payment of related party receivables		—		151,400
Shares issued on acquisition deposit	$	500,000		—
Warrants issued with debt	$	811,447		2,182,732
Cashless exercise of placement agent warrants	$	3,594,435		—
Deferred offering costs	$	63,500		—
Beneficial conversion feature on note payable	$	243,711		—
Settlement of derivative liabilities	$	13,323		—
Warrant liabilities	$	27,647,425	$	2,182,732
Common Shares issued in conversion of notes payable	$	4,980,763	$	—

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements

AS SEEN ON TV, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(UNAUDITED)

Note 1.

Description of Our Business

As Seen On TV, Inc., a Florida corporation (the “Company” or “ASTV”), was organized in November 2006. ASTV and its operating subsidiaries (collectively referred to as the “Company”) market and distribute products and services through direct response channels. Our operations are conducted principally through our wholly-owned subsidiary, TV Goods, Inc., a Florida corporation organized in October 2009 (“TVG”).

Our executive offices are located in Clearwater, Florida.

Due to the similar nature of the underlying business and the overlap of our operations, we view and manage these operations as one business; accordingly, we do not report as segments.

Note 2.

Basis of Presentation

The accompanying unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) for reporting of interim financial information. Pursuant to such rules and regulations, certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States have been condensed or omitted. Accordingly, these statements do not include all the disclosures normally required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States for annual financial statements and should be read in conjunction with Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations contained in this report. The accompanying consolidated condensed balance sheet as of March 31, 2011 has been derived from our audited financial statements. The condensed consolidated statements of operations and cash flows for the three months and nine months ended December 31, 2011 are not necessarily indicative of the results of operations or cash flows to be expected for any future period or for the year ending March 31, 2012.

The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared by management and should be read in conjunction to our consolidated financial statements, including the notes thereto, appearing in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2011. In the opinion of management, the accompanying unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements contain all adjustments necessary to present fairly the financial position and results of operations as of the dates and for the periods presented.

Effective October 27, 2011, the Company changed its name from H & H Imports, Inc. (“H&H”) to As Seen On TV, Inc.

On May 28, 2010, H&H completed an Agreement and Plan of Merger (the “Merger Agreement”) with TV Goods Holding Corporation, a Florida corporation (“TV Goods”) and the Company’s wholly owned subsidiary, TV Goods Acquisition, Inc. (“Acquisition Sub”), pursuant to which TV Goods merged with Acquisition Sub and continues its business as a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company. TVG is a wholly owned subsidiary of TV Goods (TV Goods and TVG sometimes collectively referred to in this report as “TV Goods”). Under the terms of the Merger Agreement, the TV Goods shareholders received shares of H&H common stock such that the TV Goods shareholders received approximately 98% of the total shares of H&H issued and outstanding following the merger. Due to the nominal assets and limited operations of H&H prior to the merger, the transaction was accorded reverse recapitalization accounting treatment under the provision of Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standards Codification (“FASB ASC”) 805 whereby TV Goods became the accounting acquirer (legal acquiree) and H&H was treated as the accounting acquiree (legal acquirer). The historical financial records of the Company are those of the accounting acquirer adjusted to reflect the legal capital of the accounting acquiree. In connection with the recapitalization transaction, TV Goods paid $320,000 consideration in cash to the legal acquirer. As the transaction was treated as a recapitalization, no intangibles, including goodwill, were recognized. Concurrent with the effective date of the reverse recapitalization transaction, the Company adopted the fiscal year end of the accounting acquirer, March 31.

All share and per share information contained in this report gives retroactive effect to a 30 for 1 (30:1) forward stock split of our outstanding common stock effective March 17, 2010 and reverse recapitalization transaction completed May 28, 2010 and a 1 for 20 (1:20) reverse stock split effective October 27, 2011.

All inter-company account balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation and certain prior period amounts have been reclassified to conform with the current period presentation.

Note 3.

Liquidity

Since inception until our third fiscal quarter ending December 31, 2011, we have had limited sales and have financed our operations primarily through the issuance of shares of our common stock and the issuance of convertible notes.

At December 31, 2011, we had a cash balance of approximately $7.1 million, a working capital deficit of approximately $20.5 million and an accumulated deficit of approximately $19.5 million. As we have experienced losses from operations since our inception in October 2009, we have relied on a series of private placements and convertible debentures to fund our operations. The Company cannot predict how long it will continue to incur further losses or whether it will ever become profitable. The financial statements do not include any adjustments to reflect the possible future effects on the recoverability and classification of assets or the amounts and classification of liabilities that may result from the outcome of this uncertainty. Management believes the Company has sufficient cash resources to sustain operations through at least March 2013. The Company plans to increase revenues in order to reduce, or eliminate, its operating losses. In the event the Company incurs further losses, the Company may seek additional capital from external sources in order to enable it to continue to meet its financial obligations until it achieves profitability. There can be no assurances that the Company will be able to raise additional capital on favorable terms, or at all.

Note 4.

Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Accounting Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amount of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements. Estimates also affect the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reported periods. Our management believes the estimates utilized in preparing our condensed consolidated financial statements are reasonable. Actual results could differ from these estimates.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

Cash and cash equivalents are recorded in the balance sheets at cost, which approximates fair value. All highly liquid investments purchased with an original maturity of three months or less are considered to be cash equivalents.

Revenue Recognition

We recognize revenue from product sales in accordance with FASB ASC 605 — Revenue Recognition. Following agreements or orders from customers, we ship product to our customers often through a third party facilitator. Revenue from product sales is only recognized when substantially all the risks and rewards of ownership have transferred to our customers, the selling price is fixed and collection is reasonably assured. Typically, these criteria are met when our customer’s order is received and we receive acknowledgment of receipt by a third party shipper or cash is received by our third party facilitator.

We also have offered our customers on a limited basis, services consisting of planning, shooting and editing infomercials to aid in the Direct Response marketing of their product or service. In these instances, revenue is recognized when the contracted services have been provided and accepted by the customer. Deposits, if any, on these services are recorded as deferred revenue until earned. Production costs associated with a given project are deferred until the related revenues are earned and recognized. As of December 31, 2011 and March 31, 2011 we had recognized deferred revenue of $68,250 and $88,652, respectively.

The Company has a return policy whereby the customer can return any product within 60 days of receipt for a full refund excluding shipping and handling. However, historically the Company has accepted returns past 60 days of receipt. The Company provides an allowance for returns based upon past experience and industry knowledge. All significant returns for the periods presented have been offset against gross sales. The Company also provides a reserve for warranty which is not deemed to be significant as of December 31, 2011.

Investments

We carry our investments at December 31, 2011 and March 31, 2011, at our direct cash cost. The amounts paid were determined by contract provision on the contract commitment date. Due to our percentage ownership of 10% and lack of significant influence, the investments made by the Company are not accounted for under the consolidation or equity methods of accounting. These investments are accounted for under the cost method as provided under ASC 325-Investments-Other. Under this method, the Company’s share of the earnings or losses of each investee company are not included in our Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations. However, impairment charges, if any, are recognized in the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations. If circumstances suggest that the value of the investee company has subsequently recovered, such recovery is not recorded.

Receivables

Accounts receivable consists of amounts due from the sale of our direct response and home shopping related products. Accounts receivables totaled $1,146,572 and $82,238 at December 31, 2011, and March 31, 2011, respectively. Our allowance for doubtful accounts at December 31, 2011, and March 31, 2011, totaled $113,381 and $25,000, respectively. The allowances are estimated based on historical customer experience and industry knowledge.

Inventories and Advances on Inventory Purchases

Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market. Cost is determined using a first-in, first-out, or FIFO, method. We review our inventory for excess or obsolete inventory and write-down obsolete or otherwise unmarketable inventory to its estimated net realizable value. Inventories totaled $1,485,639 and $1,107 at December 31, 2011 and March 31, 2011, respectively. As we do not internally manufacture any of our products, we do not maintain raw materials or work-in-process inventories. In addition, the Company had made advanced deposits against inventory orders placed totaling $2,134,298 and $0 at December 31, 2011 and March 31, 2011, respectively.

At December 31, 2011, the Company had a balance of $2,134,298 in deposits on inventory purchases. This balance represents payments made to our product suppliers in advance of delivery to the Company. Upon delivery and receipt by the Company of the items ordered, and the Company taking title to the goods, the balances are transferred to inventory.

Property, Plant and Equipment, net

We record property, plant and equipment and leasehold improvements at historical cost. Expenditures for maintenance and repairs are recorded to expense; additions and improvements are capitalized. We provide for depreciation using the straight-line method at rates that approximate the estimated useful lives of the assets. Leasehold improvements are amortized on a straight-line basis over the shorter of the useful life of the improvement or the remaining term of the lease.

Depreciation expense totaled $14,779 and $36,101 for the three month and nine month periods ending December 31, 2011, respectively and $7,472 and $13,817 for the three month and nine month periods ending December 31, 2010, respectively.

Earnings (Loss) Per Share

The Company adopted FASB ASC 260-Earnings Per Share. Basic earnings per share is based on the weighted effect of all common shares issued and outstanding and is calculated by dividing net income (loss) available to common stockholders by the weighted average shares outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per share is calculated by dividing net income available to common stockholders by the weighted average number of common shares used in the basic earnings per share calculation plus the number of common shares, if any, that would be issued assuming conversion of all potentially dilutive securities outstanding.

The following is a reconciliation of the number of shares used in the calculation of basic earnings per share and diluted earnings per share for the three and nine months ended December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively. All potentially dilutive common shares were anti-dilutive for the nine months ended December 31, 2011, and for the three and nine month periods ending December 31, 2010.


	Three Months Ended December 31,					Nine Months Ended December 31,
	2011		2010			2011			2010

Net Income (loss)	$	2,245,024	$	(979,472	)	$	(10,201,446	)	$	(1,219,293	)

Weighted-average number of common shares outstanding		26,179,515		10,187,700			16,358,756			9,679,038

Incremented shares from the assumed exercise of dilutive securities:
Stock options		—		—			—			—
Convertible Note		—		—			—			—
Dilutive warrants		2,528,450		—			—			—
		28,707,965		10,187,700			16,358,756			9,679,038
Net earnings (loss) per share:
Basic	$	0.09	$	(0.10	)	$	(0.62	)	$	(0.13	)
Diluted	$	0.08	$	(0.10	)	$	(0.62	)	$	(0.13	)

The following securities were not included in the computation of diluted net earnings per share as their effect would be anti-dilutive:


	Three Months Ended December 31,			Nine Months Ended December 31,
		2011	2010		2011	2010

Stock options		1,300,000	800,000		1,300,000	800,000
Warrants		29,341,814	5,737,500		40,859,253	5,737,500
Convertible Notes			—		—	—
Related Party Convertible Note			71,333		—	71,333
		30,641,814	6,608,833		42,159,253	6,608,833

Share-Based Payments

In May 2010, the Company adopted its 2010 Executive Equity Incentive Plan and 2010 Non Executive Equity Incentive Plan. In May 2010, the Board of Directors granted 600,000 options under the Executive Equity Incentive Plan and in May 2010 and July 2010, 500,000 options under the Non Executive Equity Incentive Plan. These options were exchanged for Company options with identical terms under the Merger Agreement. The weighted-average grant-date fair value of these awards was $880,000. On February 18, 2011, the Board of Directors increased the number of options available under both the 2010 Executive Equity Incentive Plan and the 2010 Non Executive Incentive Plan by 300,000 options and 300,000 options, respectively.

We recognize share-based compensation expense on stock option awards. Compensation expense is recognized on that portion of option awards that are expected to ultimately vest over the vesting period from the date of grant. All options granted vest over their requisite service periods as follows: 6 months (50% vesting); 12 months (25% vesting) and 18 months (25% vesting). We granted no stock options or other equity awards which vest based on performance or market criteria. We had applied an estimated forfeiture rate of 10% to all share-based awards as of our second fiscal quarter, 2011, which represents that portion we expected would be forfeited over the vesting period. We reevaluate this analysis periodically and adjust our estimated forfeiture rate as necessary. During the third fiscal quarter of 2011, we adjusted our forfeiture rate to reflect the forfeiture of 400,000 Non Executive Equity Plan options granted resulting from employee terminations.

In September 2011, October 2011 and December 2011, the Board of Directors granted an additional 200,000 options to an officer and two directors under the Executive Equity Incentive Plan and 300,000 options under the Non Executive Plan to nine employees and one consultant. The weighted-average grant date fair value of these awards was $458,000

We utilized the Black-Scholes option pricing model to estimate the fair value of our stock options. Calculating share-based compensation expense requires the input of highly subjective judgment and assumptions, including estimates of expected life of the award, stock price volatility, forfeiture rates and risk-free interest rates. The assumptions used in calculating the fair value of share-based awards represent our best estimates, but these estimates involve inherent uncertainties and the application of management judgment. As a result, if factors change and we use different assumptions, our share-based compensation expense could be materially different in the future.

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets

We review our long-lived assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable from future undiscounted cash flows. Impairment losses are recorded for the excess, if any, of the carrying value over the fair value of the long-lived assets. No indicators of impairment existed at December 31, 2011.

Income Taxes

We account for income taxes in accordance with FASB ASC 740 — Income Taxes. Under this method, deferred income taxes are determined based on the estimated future tax effects of differences between the financial statement and tax basis of assets and liabilities given the provisions of enacted tax laws. Deferred income tax provisions and benefits are based on changes to the assets or liabilities from year to year. In providing for deferred taxes, we consider tax regulations of the jurisdictions in which we operate, estimates of future taxable income, and available tax planning strategies. If tax regulations, operating results or the ability to implement tax-planning strategies vary, adjustments to the carrying value of deferred tax assets and liabilities may be required. Valuation allowances are recorded related to deferred tax assets based on the “more likely than not” criteria of FASB ASC 740 — Income Taxes.

FASB ASC 740 also requires that we recognize the financial statement benefit of a tax position only after determining that the relevant tax authority would more likely than not sustain the position following an audit. For tax positions meeting the “more-likely-than-not” threshold, the amount recognized in the financial statements is the largest benefit that has a greater than 50 percent likelihood of being realized upon ultimate settlement with the relevant tax authority.

The fiscal years March 31, 2011 and 2010 are considered open tax years in U.S. Federal and State jurisdictions. We currently do not have any audit investigations in any jurisdictions.

Concentration of Credit Risk

Financial instruments that potentially expose us to concentrations of credit risk consist primarily of cash, cash equivalents and trade accounts receivable. Cash and cash equivalents are held with financial institutions in the United States and from time to time we may have balances that exceed the amount of insurance provided by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation on such deposits. Concentration of credit risk with respect to our trade accounts receivable to our customers is limited to $1,146,572 at December 31, 2011. Credit is extended to our customers, based on an evaluation of a customer’s financial condition and collateral is not required. To date, we have not experienced any material credit losses.

Fair Value Measurements

FASB ASC 820 — Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures, defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. FASB ASC 820 requires disclosures about the fair value of all financial instruments, whether or not recognized, for financial statement purposes. Disclosures about the fair value of financial instruments are based on pertinent information available to us on December 31, 2011, and March 31, 2011, respectively. Accordingly, the estimates presented in these financial statements are not necessarily indicative of the amounts that could be realized on disposition of the financial instruments.

FASB ASC 820 specifies a hierarchy of valuation techniques based on whether the inputs to those valuation techniques are observable or unobservable. Observable inputs reflect market data obtained from independent sources, while unobservable inputs reflect market assumptions. The hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1 measurement) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3 measurement).

The three levels of the fair value hierarchy are as follows:

Level 1 — Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the reporting entity has the ability to access at the measurement date. Level 1 primarily consists of financial instruments whose value is based on quoted market prices such as exchange-traded instruments and listed equities.

Level 2 — Inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. Level 2 includes financial instruments that are valued using models or other valuation methodologies. These models consider various assumptions, including volatility factors, current market prices and contractual prices for the underlying financial instruments. Substantially all of these assumptions are observable in the marketplace, can be derived from observable data or are supported by observable levels at which transactions are executed in the marketplace.

Level 3 — Unobservable inputs for the asset or liability. Financial instruments are considered Level 3 when their fair values are determined using pricing models, discounted cash flows or similar techniques and at least one significant model assumption or input is unobservable.

The carrying amounts reported in the consolidated balance sheet for cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable, notes payable and accrued expenses approximate their fair value based on the short-term maturity of these instruments. Determination of fair value of related party payables is not practicable due to their related party nature.

The Company recognizes all derivative financial instruments as assets or liabilities in the financial statements and measures them at fair value with changes in fair value reflected as current period income or loss unless the derivatives qualify as hedges. As a result, certain warrants issued in connection with various offerings were accounted for as derivatives. Additionally, the Company determined that the conversion feature on the convertible debentures issued in August 2011 and May 2011 qualifies for derivative accounting. See Note 8, Warrant Liabilities and Note 10, Notes Payable, for additional discussion.

Debt Issuance Costs

The Company capitalizes debt issuance costs and amortizes these costs to interest expense over the term of the related debt.

New Accounting Standards

In May 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2011-04, Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820): Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in U.S. GAAP and IFRS. ASU No. 2011-04 clarifies some existing concepts, eliminates wording differences between U.S. GAAP and International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRS”), and in some limited cases, changes some principles to achieve convergence between U.S. GAAP and IFRS. ASU No. 2011-04 results in a consistent definition of fair value and common requirements for measurement of and disclosure about fair value between U.S. GAAP and IFRS. ASU No. 2011-04 also expands the disclosures for fair value measurements that are estimated using significant unobservable (Level 3) inputs. The provisions of ASU No. 2011-04 will become effective for us on April 1, 2012 and are to be applied prospectively. We do not expect the adoption of the provisions of ASU No. 2011-04 to have a material effect on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows and we do not expect to materially modify or expand our financial statement footnote disclosures.

In June 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-05, Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Presentation of Comprehensive Income. ASU No. 2011-05 requires an entity to present the total of comprehensive income, the components of net income, and the components of other comprehensive income either in a single continuous statement of comprehensive income, or in two separate but consecutive statements. ASU No. 2011-05 eliminates the option to present components of other comprehensive income as part of the statement of stockholders’ equity. The

presentation requirements will become effective for us on April 1, 2012. As ASU No. 2011-05 applies to financial statement presentation matters, the adoption of ASU No. 2011-05 will not affect our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows and we believe our current presentation of comprehensive income complies with the new presentation requirements.

Note 5.

Prepaid expenses and other current assets

Components of prepaid expenses and other current assets consist of the following:


	December 31, 2011		March 31, 2011
	December 31, 2011		March 31, 2011

Prepaid shipping and freight	$	89,619	$	—
Prepaid license fees		53,129		—
Prepaid media expense		40,000		—
Prepaid expenses - other		199,429		28,065
Deposits		12,420		12,420
Project deposits		—		5,885
	$	394,597	$	46,370

Note 6.

Accrued expenses and other current liabilities

Accrued expenses and other current liabilities consist of the following:


	December 31, 2011		March 31, 2011
	December 31, 2011		March 31, 2011

Accrued compensation	$	103,592	$	—
Accrued warranty		90,000		—
Accrued professional fees		108,850		45,200
Accrued rents				53,613
Accrued other		6,992		9,513
	$	309,434	$	108,326

Note 7.

Private Placements

On June 15, 2011 the Company and approximately twenty accredited investors entered into a securities purchase agreement and completed a closing of a private offering of 292,500 shares of the Company’s common stock and three series of warrants to purchase up to 585,000 shares of common stock, in the aggregate, for aggregate gross proceeds of $1,170,000. The Company sold the shares at an initial purchase price of $4.00 per share, which may be adjusted downward, but not to less than $2.00 per share, under certain circumstances. In addition to the shares, the Company issued: (i) Series A Common Stock purchase warrants to purchase up to 292,500 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $3.00 per share; (ii) Series B Common Stock purchase warrants to purchase up to 146,250 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $5.00 per share and (iii) Series C Common Stock purchase warrants to purchase up to 146,250 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $10.00 per share.

In August 2011, a majority of the investors in the June 15, 2011 private offering, entered into a Notice, Consent, Amendment and Waiver Agreement (“Amendment Agreement”) with the Company in connection with the Bridge Debenture (defined below) offering. Under the terms of the Amendment Agreement, all the investors (i) waived any right to participate in the Bridge Debenture offering or related offerings, (ii) waived a provision prohibiting certain subsequent equity sales and (iii) amendment to per share price protection. In exchange, the Company lowered the sale price of the June 15, 2011 private offering from $4.00 per share to $2.00 per share and according issued an additional 292,500 common shares under that agreement to the investors.

The Company engaged a registered broker dealer in connection with the offering and the broker dealer received a selling commission in cash of 10 percent of the aggregate funds raised, with an additional two percent in non-accountable cash expense allowance. In addition, the Company issued to the broker dealer common stock purchase warrants equal to 10 percent of (i) the number of shares and (ii) the number of shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of the warrants, with an exercise price of $3.00 per share.

On August 29, 2011, the Company raised aggregate gross proceeds of $1,800,000 under a private placement of 12% Senior Convertible Debentures (the “Bridge Debentures”) with six accredited investors. Investors purchased Debentures, in the aggregate principal amount of $1,800,000. The Bridge Debentures carried an interest at a rate of 12% per annum and were payable quarterly. Principal and accrued interest on the Bridge Debentures would automatically convert into equity securities identical to those sold to investors in the Company’s next offering of at least $4 million of gross proceeds of equity or equity linked securities (excluding the principal amount under the Bridge Debentures) that is consummated during the term of the Bridge Debentures (a “Qualified Financing”) at a conversion price equal to 80% of the price paid by investors in the Qualified Financing (the “Conversion Price”). Furthermore, the Bridge Debentures could have been converted at anytime at the option of the each Investor into shares of the Company's common stock, $0.0001 par value per share at an initial conversion price of $2.00 per share, subject to adjustment. The Debenture was due and payable on March 1, 2012 (the “Maturity Date”). In the event a Qualified Financing was not consummated on or before the Maturity Date, the entire principal amount of the Bridge Debenture, along with all accrued interest thereon, would, at the option of the holder, be convertible into the Company’s common stock at a conversion price equal to $2.00 per share. The Company determined that the conversion option in the debentures was beneficial at issuance. As such, the Company recorded a discount from the beneficial conversion option of approximately $244,000 which was accreted to interest expense throughout the term of the Bridge Debentures.

Each investor also received a Bridge Warrant exercisable for a period of three years from the Closing Date to purchase a number of shares of the Company’s common stock equal to the quotient obtained by dividing the principal amount of the Debenture by the Conversion Price at an exercise price equal to $2.00, subject to adjustment. If a Qualified Financing did not occur on or before the Maturity Date, then each Warrant would have been exercisable for that number of shares of common stock equal to the principal amount of the Debenture purchased divided by $0.90. Under the terms of the Bridge Warrant, the investor received cashless exercise rights in the event the underlying shares of common stock are not registered at the time of exercise. The Bridge Debentures and Bridge Warrants also provided for full-ratchet anti-dilution protection in the event that any shares of common stock, or securities convertible into common stock, are issued at less than the Exercise Price of the Warrants, except in connection with the following issuances of the Company's common stock, or securities convertible into common stock: (i) shares issuable under currently outstanding securities, including those authorized under stock plans, (ii) securities issuable upon the exchange or exercise of the Bridge Debenture or Bridge Warrants, (iii) securities issued pursuant to acquisitions or strategic transactions, or (iv) securities issued to the Placement Agent. See Note 8 for additional information about the Bridge Warrants.

On October 28, 2011 (the “Closing Date”) the Company, entered into and consummated a Securities Purchase Agreement with certain accredited investors for the private sale (the “Offering”) of 243.1 units (“Unit”) at $50,000 per Unit. Each Unit consisting of (i) 62,500 shares of common stock, and (ii) warrants to purchase 62,500 shares of common stock at an initial exercise price of $1.00 per share (the “Warrants”). Accordingly, for each $0.80 invested, investors received one share of common stock and one Warrant. The Company received gross proceeds of $12,155,000 (net proceeds of approximately $10,610,653 after commissions and offering related expenses) and issued an aggregate of 15,194,695 shares of common stock and 15,193,750 Warrants to the investors pursuant to the Securities Purchase Agreement.

On November 18, 2011, the Company sold an additional 6.9 Units under the Securities Purchase Agreement, receiving an additional $345,000 in gross proceeds (net proceeds of $283,600 after commissions and offering related expenses), issuing an additional aggregate of 431,250 shares of Common Stock and 431,250 Warrants to investors.

The October 28, 2011 and November 18, 2011 closings brought the total raised under the Securities Purchase Agreement to $12,500,000.

The Warrants are exercisable at any time within five years from the Closing Date at an exercise price of $1.00 per share with cashless exercise in the event a registration statement covering the resale of the shares underlying the Warrants is not in effect within six months of the completion of the Offering. The Warrants also provide for full-ratchet anti-dilution protection in the event that any shares of common stock, or securities convertible into common stock, are issued at less than the exercise price of the Warrants during any period in which the Warrants are outstanding, subject to certain exceptions as set forth in the Warrants.

If during a period of two years from the completion of the Offering, the Company issues additional shares of common stock or other equity or equity-linked securities at a purchase, exercise or conversion price less than $0.80 (subject to certain exceptions and such price is subject to adjustment for splits, recapitalizations, reorganizations), then the Company shall issue additional shares of common stock to the investors so that the effective purchase price per share paid for the common stock included in the Units shall be the same per share purchase, exercise or conversion price of the additional shares.

The Company has provided the investors with “piggyback” registration rights with respect to the resale of the common stock and the shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of the Warrants.

The Company engaged a registered broker dealer to serve as placement agent (the “Placement Agent”) who received (a) selling commissions aggregating 10% of the gross proceeds of the Offering, (b) a non-accountable expense allowance of 2% of the gross proceeds of the Offering to defray offering expenses, (c) five-year warrants to purchase such number of shares of common stock as is equal to 10% of the shares of common stock (i) included as part of the Units sold in this Offering at an exercise price equal to $0.80 per share, and (ii) issuable upon exercise of the Warrants sold in this Offering at an exercise price equal to $1.00 per share, and (d) 100,000 restricted shares of common stock.

The closing of the Offering triggered the automatic conversion of all principal and accrued interest on the Bridge Debentures into Units in the Offering at a conversion price equal to 80% of the price paid by investors in the Offering, or $0.64 per share of common stock and Warrant (the “Debenture Conversion Price”). The holders of the Bridge Debentures received an aggregate of 2,869,688 shares of common stock and Warrants to purchase 2,869,688 shares of common stock. Each investor in the Bridge Offering also received a Bridge Warrant exercisable for a period of three years from the closing date of the Bridge Offering to purchase a number of shares of the Company’s common stock equal to the quotient obtained by dividing the principal amount of the Bridge Debenture by the Debenture Conversion Price of $0.64 per share. Accordingly, at the closing of the Offering and based on the full ratchet anti-dilution provisions of the Bridge Warrants, investors in the Bridge Offering received Bridge Warrants to purchase an aggregate of 8,789,063 shares of common stock. The Bridge Warrants continue to provide for full-ratchet anti-dilution protection if the Company issues at any time prior to August 30, 2012, any shares of common stock, or securities convertible into common stock, at a price less than the Bridge Warrant Exercise Price, subject to certain exceptions.

Further, in connection with the Offering, Octagon, the holder of the Company’s debenture in the principal amount of $750,000 issued on April 8, 2011, agreed to amend the Debenture to provide for automatic conversion into the Units in the Offering at the Debenture Conversion Price. Accordingly, the holder of the Debenture received 1,171,875 shares of common stock and warrants to purchase 1,171,875 shares of common stock exercisable at $1.00 per share.

The Placement Agent also served as exclusive placement agent for the Bridge Offering. Accordingly, pursuant to the terms of the Bridge Offering, at the Closing of the Offering the Placement Agent and its assignees received warrants with full ratchet and anti dilution protection to purchase an aggregate of 1,164,375 shares of common stock exercisable at $0.64 per share, each warrant exercisable on or before August 29, 2014.

In connection with the Offering, Steve Rogai, the Company’s President and Chief Executive Officer, agreed to convert a 12% convertible promissory note payable to him by the Company in the principal amount of $107,000 (the “Rogai Note”), together with accrued interest thereon, into Units in this Offering at a conversion price of $0.80 per Share and Warrant. As such, Mr. Rogai was issued 133,750 shares of common stock and 133,750 Warrants in satisfaction of the Rogai Note. Also, the Company’s executive officers each executed a lock up agreement (the “Lock Up Agreement”) which provides that each officer shall not sell, assign, transfer or otherwise dispose of their shares of common stock or other securities of the Company for a period ending 270 days after the completion of the Offering. Following this initial lock-up period, each officer has agreed to an additional six-month lock-up period for their shares during which they each may not sell more than 5,000 shares of common stock per month.

From April 2010 through July 2010, we sold Units containing common stock and warrants raising gross proceeds of $2,600,000 (net proceeds of $2,267,813 after offering related costs of $332,187), to 64 accredited investors (the “2010 Private Placement). We secured $2,495,000 prior to June 30, 2010 and $105,000 in July 2010. The selling price was $2.00 per Unit; each Unit consists of: (1) one share (pre 1:20 reverse split) of common stock, par value $0.0001 per share; (2) one Series A Warrant to purchase one share of common stock exercisable at $3.00 per share; (3) one Series B Warrant to purchase one share of common stock exercisable at $5.00 per share; and (4) one Series C Warrant to purchase one share of common stock exercisable at $10.00 per share. In connection with the 2010 Private Placement we issued 1,300,000 shares of common stock and warrants exercisable to purchase 3,900,000 shares of common stock. The warrants expire three years from the date of issuance and are redeemable by the Company at $0.20 per share, subject to certain conditions. Other than the exercise price and call provisions of each series of warrant, all other terms and conditions of the warrants are the same.

Under the terms of the 2010 Private Placement the Company provided that it would use its best reasonable effort to cause a registration statement to become effective within 180 days of the termination date of the offering. We have failed to comply with the registration rights provision and are obligated to make pro rata payments to the subscribers under the 2010 Private Placement in an amount equal to 1% per month of the aggregate amount invested by the subscribers up to a maximum of 6% of the aggregate amount invested by the subscribers. The maximum amount of penalty to which the Company may be subject is $156,000 which has been recognized in full in fiscal 2011.

In connection with the 2010 Private Placement, we paid certain fees and commissions to Forge Financial Group, Inc., a broker-dealer and a member of FINRA, as placement agent, of approximately $280,000. In addition, the Company granted Forge Financial Group, Inc. and its assignees a placement agent warrant to purchase up to a maximum amount of $260,000 worth of Units, (the “Placement Agent Option”). The underlying Series A, Series B and Series C warrants are substantially the same as the warrants issued under the 2010 Private Placement, but contain cashless exercise and anti-dilution provisions. See Note 8. Warrant Liability.

Warrants issued to Forge Financial Group, Inc as placement agent to our April 2010 through July 2010 Unit offering contained an exercise price reset provision (or “down-round” provision). The Company accounted for these warrants as a liability equal to their fair value on each reporting date.

Note 8.

Warrant Liabilities

Warrants issued to the placement agent in connection with the 2010 Private Placement contained provisions that protect holders from a decline in the issue price of its common stock (or “down-round” provisions) or that contain net settlement provisions. The Company accounted for these warrants as liabilities instead of equity. Down-round provisions reduce the exercise or conversion price of a warrant or convertible instrument if a company either issues equity shares for a price that is lower than the exercise or conversion price of those instruments or issues new warrants or convertible instruments that have a lower exercise or conversion price. Net settlement provisions allow the holder of the warrant to surrender shares underlying the warrant equal to the exercise price as payment of its exercise price, instead of physically exercising the warrant by paying cash. The Company evaluated whether warrants to acquire its common stock contain provisions that protect holders from declines in the stock price or otherwise could result in modification of the exercise price and/or shares to be issued under the respective warrant agreements based on a variable that is not an input to the fair value of a “fixed-for-fixed” option.

The warrants issued to the placement agent, in conjunction with the 2010 Private Placement, contained a down-round provision. The triggering event of the down-round provision was not based on an input to the fair value of “fixed-for-fixed” option and therefore was not considered indexed to the Company’s stock. Since the warrant contained a net settlement provision, and it was not indexed to the Company’s stock, it is accounted for as a liability.

The assumptions used in connection with the 2010 Private Placement with the valuation as of June 22, 2011 were as follows:


Number of shares underlying the warrants			520,000
Exercise price			$2.00 - $10.00
Volatility			158%
Risk-free interest rate			.68%
Expected dividend yield			0.00%
Expected warrant life (years)			1.83 – 2.08

The Company recognized these warrants as a liability equal to their fair value on each reporting date. On June 22, 2011, the warrant holders converted their warrants on a cashless basis into 331,303 common shares at an agreed upon stock price of $16.40 per share. As a result of the warrant conversion we re-measured the fair value of these warrants as of June 22, 2011, and recorded other income associated with the re-measurement of $523,553.

In connection with our $1,800,000 12% convertible debenture issuance in August 2011, the Company issued warrants to the investors and placement agent which contained provisions that protect holders from a decline in the issue price of our common stock or “down-round” provisions. The warrants also contain net settlement provisions. Accordingly, the Company accounted for these warrants as liabilities instead of equity. In addition, we considered the dilution and repricing provisions triggered by the Company’s October 2011 follow-on offering which impacted the accounting recognition of this financing.

The Company initially recognized these warrants as liabilities equal to their allocated fair value of $1,556,289 on issuance which was recorded as a debt discount on the debenture. The debt discount was accreted to interest expense throughout the term of the debentures. The Company recorded a warrant liability of $1,522,784 related to the placement agent warrants on their date of issuance with the offset recorded to debt issuance costs. The warrants were revalued as of December 31, 2011 and the Company recognized warrant revaluation income of $208,796 for the three months ended December 31, 2011 and a warrant revaluation expense of $5,880,528 for the nine months ended December 31, 2011 in relation to this transaction.

The assumptions used in connection with the valuation of warrants issued in connection with our 12% convertible debenture financing on the date of grant were as follows:


Number of shares underlying the warrants			9,953,438
Exercise price			$0.64
Volatility			190%
Risk-free interest rate			.35%
Expected dividend yield			0.00%
Expected warrant life (years)			3.00

The assumption used in connection with the valuation of warrants issued in connection with our $12,500,000 Unit Offering were as follows:


Number of shares underlying the warrants			22,925,313
Exercise price			$0.64 - $1.00
Volatility			190%
Risk-free interest rate			1.13%
Expected dividend yield			0.00%
Expected warrant life (years)			5.00

The assumptions used in connection with the remeasurement at December 31, 2011 of the warrants issued with our 12% convertible debenture financing and $12,500,000 were as follows:


Number of shares underlying the warrants			32,878,751
Exercise price			$.064 - $1.00
Volatility			190%
Risk-free interest rate			.83%
Expected dividend yield			0.00%
Expected warrant life (years)			2.75 - 4.83

Recurring Level 3 Activity and Reconciliation

The tables below provides a reconciliation of the beginning and ending balances for the liabilities measured at fair value using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3). The table reflects gains and losses for the nine months ended December 31, 2011 for all financial liabilities categorized as Level 3 as of December 31, 2011.

Fair Value Measurements Using Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3):


Warrant liability 2010 Private Placement:
Balance as of April 1, 2011	$	4,117,988
Decrease in fair value of warrants as of conversion date		(523,553	)
Conversion to common stock		(3,594,435	)
Balance as of December 31, 2011	$	—

Warrant liability 12% convertible debenture:
Balance as of April 1, 2011	$	—
Initial measurement of investor warrants		1,556,289
Initial measurement of placement agent warrants		1,522,784
Increase in fair value warrants included in earnings		5,880,528
Balance as of December 31, 2011	$	8,959,601

Warrant liability $12,500,000 Unit Offering related:
Balance as of April 1, 2011	$	—
Initial measurement of warrants:
Unit Offering investors		18,812,123
Unit Offering placement agent		3,768,606
12% convertible debenture conversion		3,482,334
Octagon convertible debenture conversion		1,422,057
Related party note conversion		162,304
Total initial measurements		27,647,424
Decrease in fair value included in earnings		(5,768,396	)
Balance at December 31, 2011	$	21,879,028

Summary of warrant liability:
Balance as of April 1, 2011	$	4,117,988

Conversion to common stock		(3,594,435	)
Initial measurements 12% convertible debentures – investor warrants		1,556,289
Initial measurements 12% convertible debentures – placement agent		1,522,783
Initial measurements of $12,500,000 Unit Offering		27,647,425
Decrease in fair value at conversion date		(523,553	)
Increase in fair value of warrants included in earnings		112,132
Balance as of December 31, 2011	$	30,838,629

Note 9.

Related Party Transactions

Our Chief Executive Officer had loaned the Company funds in the past to meet short-term working capital needs. These loans totaled $107,000, with related accrued interest of $1,284 and $2,354 at December 31, 2011 and March 31, 2011, respectively. The loan was unsecured and carried an interest rate of 12% per annum. In May 2010, this obligation was formalized through the issuance of a 12% Convertible Promissory Note payable in the principal amount of $107,000, due May 25, 2011. The 12% Convertible Promissory Note was convertible into common shares of the Company at $1.50 per share and bears interest at 12% per annum. The conversion feature of the Promissory Note proved beneficial under the guidance of ASC 470. Accordingly, a beneficial conversion feature of $107,000 was recognized and was accreted to interest expense over the initial one year term of the note. The accreted note payable to officer balance totaled $0 and $91,219 at December 31, 2011 and March 31, 2011, respectively. On May 25, 2011, the Promissory Note was amended to extend the maturity one additional year under the same terms.

On August 18, 2011, our Chief Executive Officer entered into a Subordination Agreement relating to his note. In connection with our Bridge Debenture offering in the amount of $1,800,000, Mr. Rogai agreed to subordinate his position to that of the Bridge Offering investors. On October 28, 2011, the note in the principal amount of $107,000 was converted into Units offered in connection with the Company’s October 28, 2011 financing. As a result, Mr. Rogai received 133,750 common shares and 133,750 warrants exercisable at $1.00 per share. See Note 7.

Note 10.

Notes Payable

On April 11, 2011, the Company and Octagon Capital Partners (“Octagon”), an accredited investor, entered into a securities purchase agreement in which Octagon purchased from the Company a convertible debenture, in the principal amount of $750,000. The debenture carried an interest rate of 0% per annum and was convertible into shares of the Company's common stock at any time commencing on the date of the debenture at a conversion price of $4.00 per share, subject to adjustment. The debenture was due and payable on December 1, 2011. In connection therewith, the Company also issued the following warrants to Octagon: 187,500 Series A Common Stock Purchase Warrants exercisable at $3.00 per share, 93,750 Series B Common Stock Purchase Warrants exercisable at $5.00 per share and 93,750 Series C Common Stock Purchase Warrants exercisable at $10.00 per share. Total commissions and fees payable to the placement agent in connection with this transaction are $90,000 in cash, 42,187 Series A Common Stock Purchase Warrants exercisable at $3.00 per share and 14,062 Series B Common Stock Purchase Warrants exercisable at $5.00 per share. Warrants issued to the placement agent in this transaction had a fair value at issuance of $284,121 which was recorded as a debt issuance cost and was being accreted to interest expense over the term of the debenture. Upon issuance of the debenture, the Company accounted for the transaction under the guidance of ASC 470-Debt and ASC 815-Derivatives and Hedging. As the ultimate conversion rates could change due to a ”down-round” provision, the Company bifurcated the conversion option and recorded a derivative liability which was adjusted to market each reporting period. The derivative liability was initially valued at $222,674 on the date of the transaction and was recorded as a debt discount with a credit to a derivative liability. The change in fair value of the derivative liability recognized totaled approximately $0 and $209,000 for the three and nine month periods ended December 31, 2011, respectively. The derivative liability was re-measured at a fair value of $13,323 on August 28, 2011, the effective date of the Company’s closing of its $1,800,000 convertible debenture transaction. As the conversion price of the debentures became fixed, the fair value of the derivative liability was reclassified to equity as it no longer met bifurcation criteria on August 28, 2011. The relative fair value of the detachable warrants, initially recorded at $527,326, was recorded as a debt discount and was initially being accreted to interest expense under the effective interest rate method over the term of the debenture, due December 1, 2011.

On August 17, 2011, Octagon entered into an Amendment to its convertible debenture modifying the conversion option. The Amendment was entered into in connection with the Company’s Bridge Debenture transaction concluded on August 28, 2011. The Amendment transaction was treated as an extinguishment of debt related to the original Octagon note, effective on August 28, 2011, the closing date of the 12% convertible debenture transaction. Accordingly, the carrying value of the Octagon debenture on August 28, 2011 of $193,650, including the unaccredited balances in the related note discount and debt issuance cost of $277,524 were written-off with a loss on extinguishment of debt being recognized of $2,950,513 and a fair value of the modified note obligation being recognized of $3,144,163. The fair value of the modified note was determined by fair valuing 1,171,875 common shares and 1,171,875 related investor warrants as of August 29, 2011, the modification date.

On October 28, 2011, the Company converted the Octagon convertible debentures into Units of the Company’s Unit Offering. See Note 7.

Fair Value Measurement Using Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) – See note 8 for assumptions used:


Derivative liability:
Balance April 1, 2011	$	—
Initial valuation		222,674
Revaluation of derivative		(209,351	)
Reclassification to equity		(13,323	)
Balance at December 31, 2011	$	—

Commencing in November 2009 through March 2010, the Company issued a series of 12% Senior Working Capital Notes and Revenue Participation Agreements totaling $687,500 in gross proceeds with net proceeds of $581,750 after related costs of $105,750.

In connection with the issuance of the Senior Working Capital Notes, the Company recognized deferred financing costs of $105,750 and a discount on the notes attributable to the fair value of the common shares issued of $309,375. These costs were initially being accreted over the life of the notes. Subsequent to issuance, and at March 31, 2010, the notes were in default for failure to pay the required interest. As a result of the default, the notes became immediately callable by the note holders. Accordingly, the unaccreted balances remaining attributable to financing costs and Note discount were charged to interest expense.

Due to the default status of the notes for failure to make timely interest payments, during the first fiscal quarter of fiscal 2011, the Company entered into a series of Amendment and Exchange Agreements, modifying the terms and conditions of their 12% Senior Working Capital Notes and Revenue Participation Agreements, which totaled $687,500.

In May 2010, concurrent with the completion of the Merger Agreement, the Amended and Restated Senior Working Capital Notes totaling $687,500 were converted, at the contractual agreed upon rate of $1.334 per share, resulting in the issuance of 515,360 common shares. Also, as provided in the amended note agreements, upon conversion, the note holders were paid interest through December 31 2010, the maturity date. Actual interest earned prior to conversion plus the additional interest through the maturity date totaled $84,379. The entire interest payment was paid in cash and charged to interest expense in May 2010.

In March 2010, the Company borrowed $50,000 under a note agreement. The note was due on or before the earlier of (a) the initial closing of the Company’s then pending 2010 Private Placement or (b) August 30, 2010, the maturity date. The note provided that in the event there was no closing of the 2010 Private Placement prior to the maturity date, the note holder will forgive $25,000 and the related accrued interest. The note carried an interest rate of 12% per annum and could be prepaid at anytime; however, in the event of a prepayment, the company was obligated to pay interest through the maturity date. The lender in this transaction was an officer of the placement agent in the Company’s 2010 Private Placement. In May 2010, upon completion of the 2010 Private Placement, the note and related accrued interest were paid-in full.

Note 11.

Commitments

On January 20, 2010, the Company entered into a 38-month lease agreement for our 10,500 square foot headquarters facility in Clearwater, Florida. Terms of the lease provide for base rent payments of $6,000 per month for the first six months; a base rent of $7,500 per month for the next 18 months and $16,182 per month from January 2012 through February 2013. The increase in minimum rental payments over the lease term is not dependent upon future events or contingent occurrences. In accordance with the provisions of ASC 840 - Leases, the Company recognized lease expenses on a straight-line basis, which total $10,462 per month over the lease term.

On February 1, 2012, the Company entered into a new 36-month lease agreement on our existing headquarters facility. Terms of the lease provide for a base rent payments of $7,875 per month for the first twelve months, increasing 3% per year thereafter. The lease contains no provisions for a change in the base rent based on future events or contingent occurrences. In accordance with the provisions ASC 840-Leases, the Company will recognize lease expenses on a straight-line basis, which total $8,114 per month over the lease term. In connection with the entering into the new leases, the Company recognized income of approximately $71,000 attributable to the recovery of the deferred rent obligation under the previous lease.

The following is a schedule by year of future minimum rental payments required under our lease agreement on December 31, 2011:


	Operating Leases		Capital Leases
Year 1	$	94,500	$	—
Year 2		97,335		—
Year 3		100,255		—
Year 4		—		—
Year 5		—		—
	$	292,090	$	—

Base rent expense recognized by the Company, all attributable to its headquarters facility, totaled $(48,970) and $13,752 for the three month and nine month periods ending December 31, 2011 and 2010 and $31,386 and $88,972 for the three month periods and nine month periods ending December 31, 2010, respectively.

Under the terms of the 2010 Private Placement, the Company provided that it would use its best reasonable efforts to cause the related registration statement to become effective within 180 days of the termination date, July 26, 2010, of the offering. We have failed to comply with this registration rights provision and are obligated to make pro rata payments to the subscribers under the 2010 Private Placement in an amount equal to 1% per month of the aggregate amount invested by the subscribers up to a maximum of 6% of the aggregate amount invested by the subscribers. The maximum amount of penalty to which the Company may be subject is $156,000. The Company had recognized an accrued penalty of $156,000 at December 31, 2011 and March 31, 2011, respectively.

Note 12.

Stockholders’ Equity

Preferred Stock

We are authorized to issue up to 10,000,000 shares of preferred stock, $.0001 par value per share. Our board of directors is authorized, subject to any limitations prescribed by law, to provide for the issuance of the shares of preferred stock in series, and by filing a certificate pursuant to the applicable law of the state of Florida, to establish from time to time the number of shares to be included in each such series, and to fix the designation, powers, preferences and rights of the shares of each such series and any qualifications, limitations or restrictions thereof. No shares of preferred stock have been issued or were outstanding at December 31, 2011 and March 31, 2011, respectively.

Common Stock

At December 31, 2011 we are authorized to issue up to 750,000,000 shares of common stock, $.0001 par value per share.

At December 31, 2011 and March 31, 2011, the Company had 31,970,784 and 10,886,374 shares outstanding, respectively. Holders are entitled to one vote for each share of common stock (or its equivalent).

Effective June 15, 2011, based on a majority shareholder vote, our articles of incorporation were amended to increase our authorized common stock from 400,000,000 to 750,000,000 shares.

All share and per share information contained in this report gives retroactive effect to a 1 for 20 (1:20) reverse stock split of our outstanding effective October 27, 2011 and a 30 for 1 (30:1) forward stock split of our outstanding common stock effective March 17, 2010 and the reverse recapitalization transaction completed in May 2010.

Share Issuances

Common Stock and Warrants

On April 1, 2011, the Company issued 5,000 shares under a financial consulting and management agreement with a fair value of $75,000. The fair value of the common shares was derived from the closing price of our common stock on the contract commitment date.

On April 18, 2011, the Company issued 6,849 shares under a one year infomercial monitoring agreement. The transaction had fair value of $100,000 on the commitment date based on the closing price of our common stock. The fair value of the stock granted was recorded as a prepaid expense and is being amortized over the term of the agreement.

On June 15, 2011, the Company issued a total of 292,500 common shares and (i) 380,250 Series A warrants exercisable at $3.00 per share, (ii) 146,250 Series B warrants exercisable at $5.00 per share and (iii) 146,250 Series C warrants exercisable at $10.00 per share. These securities, as further described in Note 7 – Private Placements, were issued in connection with a private placement completed in June 2011 with gross proceeds of $1,170,000.

On June 1, 2011, the Company issued 75,000 warrants to a consulting firm representing the Company in Canada. The warrants vest over fourteen months, are exercisable for a period of three years from grant date and exercisable at $3.15 per share. The Company valued these warrants using the Black-Scholes model. The initial grant date fair value was $205,962 which is being recorded as consulting expenses in general and administrative expenses, over the vesting period with unvested components being marked-to-market every reporting period throughout the vesting term. The assumptions used in the valuation on June 1, 2011 were as follows:


Number of shares underlying the warrants			75,000
Exercise price			$3.15
Volatility			175%
Risk-free interest rate			.74%
Expected dividend yield			0.00%
Expected warrant life (years)			3.00

The assumptions in the re-measurement of the unvested warrants at December 31, 2011 were as follows:


Number of shares underlying the warrants			37,500
Exercise price			$3.15
Volatility			190%
Risk-free interest rate			.83%
Expected dividend yield			0.00%
Expected warrant life (years)			2.42

The Company recognized consulting expense (reduction) under this agreement of $(18,920) and $76,372 for the three month and nine month period ending December 31, 2011, respectively.

On June 2, 2011, the Company issued 250,000 shares of its common stock and 50,000 Common Stock purchase warrants to the sole member of Seen On TV, LLC pursuant to an acquisition agreement with Seen on TV, LLC to acquire certain assets from Seen On TV, LLC, including but not limited to the “AsSeenOnTV.com” domain name. The shares had a fair value of $500,000 at the contract date. The fair value was derived from the closing price of our common stock on the contract commitment date. The Company also paid cash consideration to Seen On TV, LLC as part of this agreement during the nine months ended December 31, 2011 of $50,000 with an additional $7,000 paid for certain rights in the United Kingdom. As no finalized acquisition agreement has been reached as of December 31, 2011 or the date of this report, the Company recorded the fair value of the shares issued and the cash consideration paid as a deposit on the acquisition. This transaction, once completed, will not meet the criteria of a business combination within the guidelines of ASC 805 – Business Combinations, and therefore will be accounted for as an asset purchase. This transaction, if and when consummated, provides the Company with exclusive use of the domain name “AsSeenOnTV.com” only. The term or phrase “As Seen On TV” is not subject to trademark protection and has been, and will continue to be, used by others including on-line and retail outlet applications with no connection with, or benefit to, the Company. While there can be no assurance, we anticipate to have this transaction completed prior to our fiscal year-end, March 31, 2012. The common stock purchase warrants issued in this transaction had a fair value of $162,192 under the following assumptions:


Number of shares underlying the warrants			50,000
Exercise price			$7.00
Volatility			190%
Risk-free interest rate			1.65%
Expected dividend yield			0.00%
Expected warrant life (years)			5

On June 22, 2011 the Company issued an aggregate of 331,303 shares of common stock to affiliates of Forge Financial Group, Inc., pursuant to the cashless exercise of warrants held by six affiliates of Forge Financial Group.

The warrants were issued in connection with the placement agent agreement related to the Company’s completed 2010 Private Placement Offering. The Company did not receive any proceeds in connection with the exercise of the warrants nor pay any commissions or fees in connection with the issuances.

On July 7, 2011, under a consulting agreement related to the Company’s investor relations activities, the Company issued 5,000 shares with a fair value of $9,000 on the contract date. The fair value of the common stock issued was derived from the closing price of our common stock on the contract commitment date.

On August 17, 2011, under the Amendment Agreement entered into in connection with the Company’s Bridge Debenture financing, the Company issued 292,500 shares to its investors in the June 15, 2011 private placement.

On October 28, 2011 the Company, entered into and consummated a Securities Purchase Agreement with certain accredited investors for the private sale of 243.1 units (each, a “Unit”) at $50,000 per Unit. Each Unit consisting of (i) 62,500 shares of common stock, and (ii) warrants to purchase 62,500 shares of common stock at an initial exercise price of $1.00 per share (the “Warrants”). Accordingly, for each $0.80 invested, investors received one share of common stock and one Warrant. The Company received gross proceeds of $12,155,000 (net proceeds of approximately $10,591,000 after commissions and offering related expenses) and issued an aggregate of 15,194,695 shares of common stock and 15,193,750 Warrants to the investors pursuant to the Securities Purchase Agreement.

The October 28, 2011 and November 18, 2011 closings brought the total raised under the Securities Purchase Agreement to $12,500,000.

A summary of the common shares and warrants issued in connection with the Company’s $12,500,000 Unit Offering including the conversion of existing debt into the Unit Offering is as follows:


			Warrants exercisable at
	Common Shares		$0.64		$0.80		$1.00

Unit Offering investors		15,625,945						15,625,000
Unit Offering placement agent		100,000		1,164,375		1,562,500		1,562,500
12% convertible debenture conversion		2,869,688		8,789,063		—		2,869,688
Octagon convertible debenture conversion		1,171,875		—		—		1,171,875
Related party note conversion		133,750		—		—		133,750
		19,901,258		9,953,438		1,562,500		21,362,813

Effective December 6, 2011 the Company entered into an independent contractor agreement with Stratcon Partners, LLC pursuant to which Stratcon has agreed to provide the Company consulting and advisory services, including, but not limited to business marketing, management, budgeting, financial analysis, and investor and press relations. Under the agreement, Stratcon is also required to establish and maintain executive facilities and a business presence in New York City for the Company. The agreement is for an initial term of two years and may be terminated by either party upon written notice. In consideration of providing the services, Stratcon shall receive $12,500 per month. In addition, the Company has agreed to issue Stratcon an aggregate of 500,000 shares of restricted common stock, such shares vesting over a period of two years in four equal traunches. The closing price of the Company’s common stock as reported on the OTC Markets on the Effective Date was $1.00. The Company has agreed to provide Stratcon rent reimbursement up to $2,500 per month for the New York office. The Company recorded $21,000 of consulting expense which is included in accrued expenses at December 31, 2011.

Effective December 6, 2011 the Company agreed to issue 25,000 shares of common stock to Mediterranean Securities Group, LLC in consideration of consulting services. As the agreement did not contain any vesting or forfeiture provisions, the entire fair value of $25,000, based on our stock price on the commitment date, was charged to consulting expenses and included in accrued expenses.

Equity Compensation Plans

In May 2010, the Company adopted its 2010 Executive Equity Incentive Plan and 2010 Non Executive Equity Incentive Plan (collectively, the “Plans”) and granted 600,000 options and 450,000 options, respectively, under TV Goods stock option plans and such options were exchanged for Company options under the Merger Agreement.

In May 2010, our Board of Directors granted 600,000 options under the Executive Equity Incentive Plan, exercisable at $1.50 per share to two officers and directors of the Company. The shares vest over eighteen months from grant and are exercisable for five (5) years from grant date (May 26, 2010). In September 2011, October 2011 and December 2011, our Board of Directors granted an additional 200,000 options to an officer and two directors under the Executive Equity Incentive Plan. The options vest over eighteen months (150,000 options) and two years (50,000 options) and are exercisable for five years from date of grant. At December 31, 2011, there were 100,000 options available for issuance under the Executive Equity Incentive Plan.

In May 2010, our Board also granted options to purchase an aggregate of 450,000 shares of our common stock with an exercise price of $1.50 per share under the Non Executive Equity Incentive Plan. The options granted vest over eighteen months from the date of the grant (March 26, 2010) and are exercisable for five (5) years from their grant date. On July 15, 2010, the Company issued an additional 50,000 shares under the Non Executive Incentive Plan under terms similar to the May 2010 grant. During the quarter ending December 31, 2010, 400,000 shares were forfeited due to termination of employment. In December 2010, an additional 100,000 options were granted under this plan. On September 26, 2011, our Board granted an additional 300,000 options under the Non Executive Plan to nine employees and one consultant. The options vest over eighteen months and are exercisable for five years from date of grant. At December 31, 2011, there were 300,000 shares available for future issuance under the Non Executive Equity Incentive Pan.

Information related to options granted under both our option plans at December 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010 and activity for the quarters then ended is as follows:


	Shares		Weighted Average Exercise Price		Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life (Years)		Aggregate Intrinsic Value

Outstanding at April 1, 2011		800,000	$	1.58		—	$	—
Granted		500,000		1.01		—		—
Exercised		—		—		—		—
Forfeited		—		—		—		—
Expired		—		—		—		—

Outstanding at December 31, 2011		1,300,000	$	1.36		3.97	$	—
Exercisable at December 31, 2011		787,500	$	1.57		3.42	$	—


	Shares			Weighted Average Exercise Price		Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life (Years)		Aggregate Intrinsic Value

Outstanding at April 1, 2010		—		$	—		—	$	—
Granted		1,200,000			1.58		—		—
Exercised		—			—		—		—
Forfeited		(400,000	)		1.50		—		—
Expired		—			—		—		—
Outstanding at December 31, 2010		800,000		$	1.58		4.49	$	—
Exercisable at December 31, 2010		350,000		$	1.50		4.42	$	—

In the event of any stock split of our outstanding common stock, the Board of Directors in its discretion may elect to maintain the stated amount of shares reserved under the Plans without giving effect to such stock split. Subject to the limitation on the aggregate number of shares issuable under the Plans, there is no maximum or minimum number of shares as to which a stock grant or plan option may be granted to any person. Plan options may either be (i) ISOs,

(ii) NSOs (iii) awards of our common stock or (iv) rights to make direct purchases of our common stock which may be subject to certain restrictions. Any option granted under the Plans must provide for an exercise price of not less than 100% of the fair market value of the underlying shares on the date of grant, but the exercise price of any ISO granted to an eligible employee owning more than 10% of our outstanding common stock must not be less than 110% of fair market value on the date of the grant. The Plans further provide that with respect to ISOs the aggregate fair market value of the common stock underlying the options which are exercisable by any option holder during any calendar year cannot exceed $100,000. The term of each plan option and the manner in which it may be exercised is determined by the Board of Directors or the compensation committee, provided that no option may be exercisable more than 10 years after the date of its grant and, in the case of an incentive option granted to an eligible employee owning more than 10% of the common stock, no more than five years after the date of the grant.

Note 13.

Subsequent Events

In February 2012, SCI Direct, LLC (“SCI”), filed suit against TV Goods, Inc. in the United States District Court, Northern District of Ohio, Eastern Division. The complaint alleges trademark infringement by TV Goods arising from our Living Pure™ space heater as it relates to SCI’s EDENPURE™ space heater. The plaintiff is seeking monetary and injunctive relief claiming TV Goods committed copyright infringement, unfair competition and violation of the Ohio Deceptive Trade Practices Act. The amount of damages the plaintiff is seeking is unspecified. We believe that the factual basis of the allegations is false and intend to vigorously defend the lawsuit.

ITEM 2.

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Forward-Looking Statements

This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements are based on our management’s beliefs, assumptions and expectations and on information currently available to our management. Generally, you can identify forward-looking statements by terms such as “may,” “will,” “should,” “could,” “would,” “expects,” “plans,” “anticipates,” “believes,” “estimates,” “projects,” “predicts,” “potential” and similar expressions intended to identify forward-looking statements, which generally are not historical in nature. All statements that address operating or financial performance, events or developments that we expect or anticipate will occur in the future are forward-looking statements, including without limitation our expectations with respect to product sales, future financings, or the commercial success of our products or services. We may not actually achieve the plans, projections or expectations disclosed in forward-looking statements, and actual results, developments or events could differ materially from those disclosed in the forward-looking statements. Our management believes that these forward-looking statements are reasonable as and when made. However, you should not place undue reliance on forward-looking statements because they speak only as of the date when made. We do not assume any obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except as may be required by federal securities laws and the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”). We may not actually achieve the plans, projections or expectations disclosed in our forward-looking statements, and actual results, developments or events could differ materially from those disclosed in the forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements are subject to a number of risks and uncertainties, including without limitation those described from time to time in our future reports filed with the SEC.

The following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations should be read together with our unaudited interim consolidated condensed financial statements and related notes appearing elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.

Company Overview

As Seen On TV, Inc. is a direct response marketing company. We identify, advise in development and market consumer products. We employ three primary channels: Direct Response Television (Infomercials), Television Shopping Networks and Retail Outlets. We have identified several candidate products for marketing which actively began in our third fiscal quarter.

We hold a wholly owned interest in TV Goods, Inc., a Florida corporation (“TVG”); Inventors Business Center, LLC, a Florida limited liability company (“IBC”); and Tru Hair, Inc., a Florida corporation. Although we hold an interest in these various entities, primarily all of our operations are conducted through TVG. TVG was formed in October 2009 and as a result has a limited operating history. As of the date of this report TV Goods has generated limited revenues. Furthermore due to the similar nature of the underlying business and the overlap of our operations, we view and manage these operations as one business, accordingly we do not report as segments.

On May 27, 2011, the Company entered into an agreement to acquire the rights to the domain name “asseenontv.com”. This transaction, once completed, will not meet the criteria of a business combination within the guidelines of ASC 805 – Business Combinations, and therefore will be accounted for as an asset purchase. This transaction, if and when consummated, provides the Company with exclusive use of the domain name “AsSeenOnTV.com” only. The term or phrase “As Seen On TV” is not subject to trademark protection and has been, and will continue to be, used by others including on-line and retail outlet applications with no connection with, or benefit to, the Company. While there can be no assurance, we anticipate to have this transaction completed prior to our fiscal year-end, March 31, 2012.

Revenue Generation

Entrepreneurs seek to leverage our experience in functions such as product selection, marketing development, media buying and direct response television production. We generate revenues primarily from two sources: sales of consumer products and infomercial production fees. We seek to offer, assist and enable inventors to market and sell consumer products.

Inventors and entrepreneurs submit products or business concepts for our review. Once we identify a suitable product/concept we obtain global marketing and distribution rights. As of the date of this report, we have marketed several products with limited success.

As of December 31, 2011, we had total assets of $13,276,731 and cash on-hand of $7,097,285, a working capital deficit of $20,479,218 and an accumulated deficit of $19,460,878. Included in our current liabilities at December 31, 2011 is $30,838,629 representing the fair value of warrants outstanding.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

See Note 4 to our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements included in this report for a discussion of recent accounting pronouncements.

Results of Operations

Revenue for the nine month period ending December 31, 2011 totaled $3,350,417, representing a very significant increase over the same period of the preceding year. Revenues for the nine months ended December 31, 2010 totaled $848,941. This increase is due in large part to the prior year’s “start up” phase, with the Company having commenced operations in October 2009, and the commencement of the Company’s marketing of its Living Pure line of space heaters commencing in the third fiscal quarter of the current year. Accordingly, traditional period-over-period comparisons of revenues and related costs would be of limited value. Sales of the Living Pure space heaters, which commenced in November 2011, accounted for approximately 71% and 55% of total revenues for the three and nine month periods ending December 31, 2011.While we do anticipate our sales to continue to increase, this growth rate should not be viewed as sustainable over the long-term. It should also be noted that our line of heaters is a seasonal product and we anticipate a sharp decline in demand following the end of the colder season.

In December 2011, the Company began marketing a line of propriety hair and beauty products under the name of Tru Hair. These sales are being managed and controlled through our wholly-owned subsidiary, Tru Hair, Inc., formed in November 2011.

A comparative summary of the source of our revenues generated for the periods presented is as follows:


	Three Months Ended December 31,				Nine Months Ended December 31,
	2011		2010		2011		2010

Living Pure heater	$	1,841,696	$	—	$	1,841,696	$	—
Other product sales		618,838		29,115		1,233,117		176,326
Production income		145,500		362,595		275,604		672,615
	$	2,606,034	$	391,710	$	3,350,417		848,941

Our ability to fund such a sharp expansion in operations, including the funding of necessary media purchases, inventories and related logistics and administrative support was made possible through a funding completed in October 2011 with gross proceeds of $12,500,000, before related offering costs of approximately $1,606,000.

Our revenue model also includes providing infomercial production for others as well as marketing specific products for which we have contractual right to the revenue stream such as our Living pure line. As detailed above, for the nine months ending December 31, 2011, approximately 8% of our revenue was attributable to infomercial production income, with the balance being generated by specific product sales for which we contracted marketing and distribution rights. For the first three fiscal quarters of the prior year, revenues primarily resulted from infomercial production revenue billed. We expect this trend in product mix to continue in the future. While there can be no assurance, management believes that developing a marketing strategy based upon distributing developed products for which the Company has ownership or the licensing rights, will ultimately prove a successful strategy.

Cost of revenue for the three month and nine month periods ending December 31, 2011 represented 54% and 57% respectively, of revenues for these periods. These costs consist primarily of the direct costs to the Company of products sold including related shipping. The Company does not manufacture any products in-house and relies on third-party suppliers, located primarily outside of the United States, for its inventory. Accordingly, our cost of products acquired for sale could vary significantly if fuel and transportation costs were to increase in the future.

Selling and marketing expenses are comprised of promotional costs incurred related to sales of the Company’s own products. These costs totaled $1,762,583 and $1,941,886 for the three month and nine month periods ending December 31, 2011. Comparable periods in the prior year did not contain these costs as prior year revenues were

primarily related to fees for our planning, shooting and editing of promotional materials for others. Components of these costs include:


	Three Months Ended December 31,			Nine Months Ended December 31,
	2011			2011

Media purchases	$	1,362,859	77%	$	1,477,975	76%
Production design costs		100,582	6%		122,363	6%
Call center support		239,111	14%		274,662	14%
Other		60,031	3%		66,886	4%
	$	1,762,583	100%	$	1,941,886	100%

The Company operates in a very competitive environment, competing in different media with products that may be very similar to those of our competitors. Accordingly, management will often test a product, on a limited basis, in a targeted market and attempt to assess the products potential prior to investing in a larger “roll-out.” The Company attempts to price the product at a level that will prove both attractive to our customer while providing the Company with a reasonable return. Often the test marketing will indicate that a particular product is not well received by a Direct Response program and the project will be dropped. This practice can, and sometimes does, as with the three month and nine month periods ending December 31, 2010, result in the recognition of costs in excess of related revenues.

General and administrative expenses consist primarily of administrative labor costs, consulting fees, marketing related travel expenses, business development costs and legal and accounting fees. Included in the costs in the current year are certain non-cash expenses including stock based compensation of $283,199 and other equity based compensation to consultants totaling approximately $319,000. While there can be no assurance, the Company anticipates that selling, general and administrative expenses will decline as a percentage of revenues as it continues to increase sales through the implementation of its marketing and growth plans.

Other Income and Expenses

For the three and nine months ended December 31, 2011, we recognized approximately $5,977,000 and $411,000, respectively, in income resulting from the revaluation of the fair value of warrants outstanding which were recorded as a liability on our balance sheet. This periodic revaluation could also result in a significant expense being recognized at the end of any given period depending on the market value of our stock. The warrants were issued in connection with a series of financings completed during the year and are revalued at the end of each reporting period to their fair value. In addition during the current fiscal year, we recognized income in the form of a change in a derivative liability of approximately $209,000. It should be noted that absent the revaluation of our warrants outstanding at December 31, 2011, the Company would have recognized a net loss of approximately $3,732,000 and $10,613,000 for the three month and nine month periods ending December 31, 2011.

As a result of the series of amendments and waivers related to the Company’s August 29, 2011 12% convertible financing and the financing itself, the Company recognized certain fair value related entries indicated under the related guidance including ASC 470-Debt.

The Company’s $750,000 convertible debenture held by Octagon Capital Partners was given extinguishment of debt recognition resulting in:

revaluation of the related derivative which, following revaluation, was reclassified to equity;

recognition of a loss on extinguishment of the debt of $2,950,513;

the expensing, to interest expense, of the unaccreted balance in the related debt issuance costs of $277,524; and

The recognition of the fair value of the note obligation on the extinguishment date of $3,144,163, subsequently converted into our Unit offering completed in October 2011.

As a result of the extinguishment of debt treatment, the Company did not recognize interest expense going forward on accretion related to the Octagon note discount or debt issuance costs balances as they were expensed in total concurrent with the extinguishment recognition in our second fiscal quarter.

In connection with the recording of the August 28, 2011 $1,800,000 12% convertible debt financing, the Company recorded:

a debt discount equal to $1,800,000 which was accreted to interest expense over a two month period, approximately $900,000 per month, being fully expensed at its exchange conversion into the October 28, 2011 financing; and

recognition of debt issuance costs associated with transaction related warrants totaling $1,522,784 was accreted to interest expense over a two month period.

During the third fiscal quarter ended December 31, 2011, in connection with our $1,800,000 debenture financing, we recognized approximately an additional $900,000 and $887,000 in accretion to interest expense related to the note discount and issuance related costs recognized. In addition, the Company marks-to market the fair value of the related warrants issued.

In connection with our $1,800,000 12% convertible debenture issuance in August 2011, the Company issued warrants to the investors and placement agent which contained provisions that protect holders from a decline in the issue price of our common stock or “down-round” provisions. The warrants also contained net settlement provisions. Accordingly, the Company accounted for these warrant as liabilities instead of equity. In addition, we considered the dilution and repricing provisions triggered by the Company’s October 2011 follow-on offering which impacted the accounting recognition of this financing during our second fiscal quarter.

Interest expenses related to note payable increased significantly for the three month and nine month periods ending December 31, 2011 over the previous year. These increases reflect the accretion to interest expense of the note discounts and debt issuance costs attributable to the Company’s convertible notes outstanding to Octagon Capital and National Securities. These notes were converted into the Company’s unit offering with National Securities completed in October 2011. Interest expense for the three month and nine month periods ending December 31, 2010 consisted primarily of interest accrued and paid on the Company’s 12% Senior Working Capital Notes which were converted in May 2010. The decrease in interest expenses to related parties between the periods was due to the accretion of the beneficial conversion feature attributable to the $107,000 note payable to the Company’s CEO.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

There have been no changes to our Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates in the nine months ended December 31, 2011. Critical accounting policies and significant estimates made in accordance with them are discussed with our Board of Directors. Those policies are discussed under “Critical Account Policies and Estimates” included in our “Management Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” included in Item 7 of our annual report on Form 10K for the year ended March 31, 2011.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

At December 31, 2011, we had a cash balance of approximately $7.1 million, a working capital deficit of approximately $20.5 million and an accumulated deficit of approximately $18.1 million. Included in our current liabilities at December 31, 2011 and negatively effecting our working capital, is $30,838,629 representing the fair value of warrants outstanding. As we have experienced losses from operations since our inception in October 2009, we have relied on a series of private placements and convertible debentures to fund our operations. Management believes the Company has sufficient cash resources to sustain operations through at least March 2013.

In May 2011, we consummated the issuance and sale of $750,000 in aggregate principal amount of convertible debentures. The Company paid $90,000, plus warrants, in issuance costs related to these debentures. The convertible debentures have no stated interest rate. The debentures were convertible at $4.00 per share, subject to adjustment, and matured on December 1, 2011 unless earlier exchanged or converted. In addition, during the quarter ended June 30, 2011, we sold Units consisting of common stock and three warrants exercisable at $3.00, $5.00 and $10.00 per share, respectively. Gross proceeds from this offering totaled $1,170,000 and were offset by issuance costs of approximately $256,000.

In August 2011, the company raised gross proceed of $1,800,000 through the private placement issuance of a series of 12% convertible debentures. The debentures were convertible into common stock and warrants.

In October 2011 the Company, entered into and consummated a Securities Purchase Agreement with certain accredited investors for the private sale of 243.1 units (each a “Unit”) at $50,000 per Unit. Each Unit consisted of (i) 62,500 shares of common stock, and (ii) warrants to purchase 62,500 shares of common stock at an initial exercise price of $1.00 per share (the “Warrants”). The Company received gross proceeds of $12,155,000 and issued an aggregate of 15,193,750 shares of common stock and 15,193,750 Warrants to the investors pursuant to the Securities Purchase Agreement. In November 2011, the Company sold an additional 6.9 Units under the Securities Purchase Agreement, receiving an additional $345,000 in gross proceeds, issuing an additional aggregate of 431,250 shares of Common Stock and 431,250 Warrants to investors. The October 28, 2011 and November 18, 2011 closings brought the total raised under the Securities Purchase Agreement to $12,500,000.

On May 27, 2011 and June 15, 2011 the Company and approximately twenty accredited investors entered into a securities purchase agreement and completed a closing of a private offering of 292,500 shares of the Company’s common stock and three series of warrants to purchase up to 585,000 shares of common stock, in the aggregate, for aggregate gross proceeds of $1,170,000. The Company sold the shares at an initial purchase price of $4.00 per share, which may be adjusted downward, but not to less than $2.00 per share, under certain circumstances. In addition to the shares, the Company issued: (i) Series A common stock purchase warrants to purchase up to 292,500 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $3.00 per share; (ii) Series B common stock purchase warrants to purchase up to 146,250 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $5.00 per share and (iii) Series C common stock purchase warrants to purchase up to 146,250 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $10.00 per share.

Commitments

On January 20, 2010, the Company entered into a 38-month lease agreement for our 10,500 square foot headquarters facility in Clearwater, Florida. Terms of the lease provide for base rent payments of $6,000 per month for the first six months; a base rent of $7,500 per month for the next 18 months and $16,182 per month from January 2012 through February 2013. The increase in minimum rental payments over the lease term is not dependent upon future events or contingent occurrences. In accordance with the provisions of ASC 840 - Leases, the Company recognizes lease expenses on a straight-line basis, which total $10,462 per month over the lease term.

On February 1, 2012, the Company entered into a new 36-month lease agreement for our 10,500 square foot headquarters facility. Terms of the lease provide for a base rent payments of $7,875 per month for the first twelve months, increasing 3% per year thereafter. The lease contains no provisions for a change in the base rent based on future events or contingent occurrences. In accordance with the provisions ASC 840-Leases, the Company recognizes lease expenses on a straight-line basis, which total $8,114 per month over the lease term. In connection with entering into the new lease, the Company recognized income of approximately $71,000 attributable to the recovery of the deferred rent obligation under the previous lease.

The following is a schedule by year of future minimum rental payments required under our lease agreement on December 31, 2011:


	Operating Leases		Capital Leases
Year 1	$	94,500	$	—
Year 2		97,335		—
Year 3		100,255		—
Year 4		—		—
Year 5		—		—
	$	292,090	$	—

Base rent expense recognized by the Company, all attributable to its headquarters facility, totaled $31,386 and $94,158 for the three month and nine month periods ending December 31, 2011 and 2010 and $31,386 and $88,972 for the three month periods and nine month periods ending December 31, 2010, respectively.

amount invested by the subscribers up to a maximum of 6% of the aggregate amount invested by the subscribers. The maximum amount of penalty to which the Company may be subject is $156,000. The Company had recognized an accrued penalty of $156,000 at December 31, 2011 and March 31, 2011,

Subsequent Events

ITEM 3.

QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

Not applicable to smaller reporting companies.

ITEM 4.

CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

Our management carried out an evaluation with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer and who serve as our principal executive officer and principal financial and accounting officer, required by Rule 13a-15 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Exchange Act.

Based on this evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer concluded that as of December 31, 2011, our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective such that the information relating to our company required to be disclosed in our SEC reports (i) is recorded processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in SEC rules and forms a (ii) is accumulated and communicated to our management to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures. Our management concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective as described in more detail below. A material weakness is a deficiency or combination of deficiencies in internal control over financial reporting such that a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis.

The specific weaknesses identified by our management were insufficient segregation of duties in our finance and accounting functions and lack of sufficient review by corporate management. The weaknesses are principally due to our recent transition from a private company to public company and lack of resources and working capital. During the period covered by this report we had limited staff. These deficiencies resulted in the following:

On and after May 28, 2010, we did not have the appropriate policies and procedures in place to ensure that the reverse merger transaction on May 28, 2010 was accounted for as a reverse recapitalization rather that a reverse acquisition transaction.

We did not properly recognize our base rent expense on our Clearwater, Florida facility using the straight-line method.

We did not provide certain required, expended disclosures in our financial footnotes relating to our share based payments and warrant issuances during the periods reported.

Certain adjustments were made to our financial statements as a result of improper accounting treatment of complex debt and equity transactions.

Insufficient resources which restricts the Company’s ability to complete financial statements in a timely manner.

Lack of an audit committee which results in ineffective oversight over the Company’s financial reporting and accounting.

To mitigate the current limited resources and limited employees, we rely heavily on direct management oversight of transactions, along with the use of legal and accounting consultants. As we grow, we expect to increase our number of employees, which will enable us to implement adequate segregation of duties within the internal control framework. To correct these ongoing material weaknesses referenced above, management has implemented an overall program of enhanced disclosures and review procedures. We continue to formalize and update the documentation of our internal control processes, including our financial reporting processes. Subject to additional working capital we intend to hire additional accounting personnel.

Changes in Internal Controls Over Financial Reporting

There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act that occurred during the period covered by this report that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

PART II.–OTHER FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1.

LEGAL PROCEEDINGS.

From time to time, we are periodically a party to or otherwise involved in legal proceedings arising in the normal and ordinary course of business. As of the date of this report, we are not aware of any proceeding, threatened or pending, against us which, if determined adversely, would have a material effect on our business, results of operations, cash flows or financial position. See Footnote 13 for a legal matter commenced subsequent to the period of this report.

ITEM 1A.

RISK FACTORS

Not applicable to smaller reporting companies.

ITEM 2.

UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS

In addition to those unregistered securities previously disclosed in filings with the SEC, we have sold securities which are not registered under the Securities Act of 1933 (the “Act”), as described below.

Effective December 6, 2011 the Company agreed to issue 25,000 shares of common stock to Mediterranean Securities Group, LLC in consideration of consulting services. The shares will be issued pursuant to the exemption from registration provided by Section 4(2) of the Act. The certificate representing the shares shall contains legend restricting its transfer absent registration or applicable exemption.

ITEM 3.

DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES

None.

ITEM 4.

(REMOVED AND RESERVED)

ITEM 5.

OTHER INFORMATION

None.

ITEM 6.

EXHIBITS


Exhibit Number		Description
2.1		Agreement and Plan of Merger effective May 28, 2010 (1)
3.1		Articles of Incorporation (2)
3.2		Amendment to Articles of Incorporation dated April 18, 2008 (2)
3.3		Amendment to Articles of Incorporation dated August 5, 2010 (*)
3.4		Amendment to Articles of Incorporation effective October 28, 2011 (name change and reverse split )(11)
3.5		Bylaws (2)
4.1		Form of Series A, B and C Warrant 2010 (1)
4.2		Form of Placement Agent Warrant 2010 (1)
4.3		Convertible Promissory Note issued to Steven Rogai (1)
4.4		Form of Series A-1, B-1 and C-1 Warrant (*)
4.5		Convertible Debenture dated April 8, 2011(6)
4.5.1		Amendment to Convertible Debenture dated April 8, 2011 (12)
4.6		Form of Convertible Debenture issued August 29, 2011 (12)
4.7		Form of Warrant issued August 29, 2011 (12)
4.8		Form of Warrant issued under Securities Purchase Agreement dated October 28, 2011 (13)
4.9		Form of Placement Agent Warrant issued under Securities Purchase Agreement dated October 28, 2011 (13)
4.10		Form of Common Stock Warrant issued under Securities Purchase Agreement dated October 28, 2011 (13)


10.1.1		Services Agreement with Kevin Harrington (10)
10.1.2		Employment Agreement with Steve Rogai (10)
10.1.3		Employment Agreement with Dennis Healey (10)
10.1.4		Independent Director Agreement with Jeffrey Schwartz (10)
10.1.5		Form of Lock Up Agreement (10)
10.2		Executive Equity Incentive Plan (3)
10.3		Non Executive Equity Incentive Plan (3)
10.4		Lease Agreement (to be filed by amendment)
10.6		Form of 2010 Private Placement Subscription Agreement (*)
10.7		Form of October 2010 Private Placement Subscription Agreement (*)
10.8		Infomercial Production and Brand License Agreement (9)
10.9		Securities Purchase Agreement dated April 11, 2011 (6)
10.10		Securities Purchase Agreement dated May 27, 2011 (7)
10.11		Severance, Consulting and Release Agreement dated March 23, 2011 (*)
10.12		Securities Purchase Agreement effective August 29, 2011 (12)
10.13		Notice, Consent, Amendment and Waiver Agreement between the Company and a majority of the Purchasers under the Securities Purchase Agreement dated May 27, 2011, effective August 29, 2011 (12)
10.14		Securities Purchase Agreement dated October 28, 2011 (13)
10.15		Binding Letter Agreement dated May 27, 2011 (14)
10.16		Stratcon Partners, LLC Agreement effective December 6, 2011 (15)
16.1		Letter of Former Accountant (4)
16.2		Letter of Former Accountant (8)
21.1		List of subsidiaries of the Company (*)
31.1		Certification Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) (Provided herewith)
31.2		Certification Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) (Provided herewith)
32.1		Certification Pursuant to Section 1350 (Provided herewith)
32.2		Certification Pursuant to Section 1350 (Provided herewith)
101		XBRL Interactive Data File**

———————

Incorporated by reference to Form S-1 Registration Statement filed November 23, 2010, as amended (333-170778).

Attached as Exhibit 101 to this report are the following financial statements from the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 31, 2011 formatted in XBRL (eXtensible Business Reporting Language): (i) the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets, (ii) the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss), (iii) the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, and (iv) related notes to these financial statements tagged as blocks of text. The XBRL-related information in Exhibit 101 to this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q shall not be deemed “filed” or a part of a registration statement or prospectus for purposes of Sections 11 or 12 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and is not filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or otherwise subject to the liabilities of those sections.

1) Incorporated by reference to the Company’s current report on Form 8-K dated May 28, 2010 filed on June 4, 2010.

(2) Incorporated by reference to the Company’s registration statement on Form S-1 filed April 24, 2008.

(3) Incorporated by reference to the Company’s Schedule 14C Definitive Information Statement filed on July 8, 2010.

(4) Incorporated by reference to Form 8-K dated June 22, 2010, filed on June 24, 2010.

(5) Incorporated by reference to Form 10-Q Quarterly Report for the period ended December 31, 2010.

(6) Incorporated by reference to Form 8-K dated April 11, 2011 filed on April 15, 2011.

(7) Incorporated by reference to Form 8-K dated May 27, 2011 filed on June 8, 2011.

(8) Incorporated by reference to Form 8-K dated June 8, 2011 filed on June 14, 2011.

(9) Incorporated by reference to Form 10-K Annual Report for the year ended March 31, 2011.

(10) Incorporated by reference to Form 8-K dated October 28, 2011 filed on November 3, 2011.

(11) Incorporated by reference to the Company’s Definitive Information Statement filed on September 19, 2011.

(12) Incorporated by reference to Form 8-K dated August 29, 2011 filed on August 31, 2011.

(13) Incorporated by reference to Form 8-K dated November 18, 2011 as filed on November 21, 2011.

(14) Incorporated by reference to Form 8-K dated May 27, 2011 filed on June 3, 2011.

(15) Incorporated by reference to Form 8-Kdated December 6, 2011 filed on December 12, 2011.

SIGNATURES

In accordance with the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

Date: February 14, 2012



	As Seen On TV, Inc.

	/s/ STEVEN ROGAI
	Steven Rogai,
	Chief Executive Officer

	/s/ DENNIS W. HEALEY
	Dennis W. Healey
	Chief Financial Officer
	(Principal Financial Officer)

As Seen On TV, Inc. - FORM 10-Q - February 14, 2012

Attached files

As Seen On TV, Inc. Reports