(1) Nature of Organization
and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Nature of Organization
Franchise Holdings International,
Inc. (referenced as we, us, our in the accompanying notes) was incorporated in the State
of Nevada on April 2, 2003. FSGI Corporation was incorporated in the State of Florida on May 15, 1997, and in a reorganization
on December 21, 1998 with another corporation named The Martial Arts Network On-Line, Inc. (originally incorporated in Florida
on May 23, 1996) changed its name to TMAN Global.Com, Inc. Franchise Holdings International, Inc. and TMAN Global.Com, Inc. consummated
a merger on April 30, 2003 whereby Franchise Holdings International, Inc. exchanged 1 common share for all the 90,861 outstanding
common shares of TMAN Global.Com, Inc. The purpose of the transaction was a change of domicile. Pursuant to the merger terms,
Franchise Holdings International, Inc. was the surviving corporation and TMAN Global.Com, Inc. ceased to exist. The accompanying
financial statements include the activities of Franchise Holdings International, Inc. and its predecessor corporations. Currently
we are engaged in evaluating franchise opportunities, and are considered to be in the development stage.
The accompanying financial statements
have been prepared on a going concern basis, which contemplates the realization of assets and the satisfaction of liabilities
in the normal course of business. As shown in the accompanying financial statements, the Company has a limited operating history
and has suffered losses since inception. These factors, among others, may indicate that the Company will be unable to continue
as a going concern.
In recent years, we have relied upon
our president and certain shareholders to contribute capital to maintain our limited operations (see Notes 2 and 3). There is
no assurance that these loans will continue, or that we will be successful in raising the capital required to continue our operations.
The financial statements do not include
any adjustments relating to the recoverability and classification of assets and/or liabilities that might be necessary should
we be unable to continue as a going concern. Our continuation as a going concern is dependent upon our ability to meet our obligations
on a timely basis, and, ultimately to attaining profitability.
Development Stage Company
We are in the development stage in
accordance with the Accounting and Reporting by Development Stage Enterprises Topic of the Financial Accounting Standards Boards
Accounting Standards Codification (FASB ASC) 915.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements
in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles permits management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the
reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of financial statements
and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
We consider all highly liquid securities
with original maturities of three months or less when acquired, to be cash equivalents. We had no cash equivalents at September
30, 2011 and 2010.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
The carrying amounts of cash and
current liabilities approximate fair value because of the short-term maturity of these items. These fair value estimates are subjective
in nature and involve uncertainties and matters of significant judgment, and, therefore, cannot be determined with precision.
Changes in assumptions could significantly affect these estimates. We do not hold or issue financial instruments for trading purposes,
nor do we utilize derivative instruments.
The FASB ASC clarifies that fair
value is an exit price, representing the amount that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an
orderly transaction between market participants. It also requires disclosure about how fair value is determined for assets and
liabilities and establishes a hierarchy for which these assets and liabilities must be grouped, based on significant levels of
inputs as follows:
1: Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.
2: Quoted prices in active markets for similar assets and liabilities and inputs that are observable for the asset or
3: Unobservable inputs in which there is little or no market data, which require the reporting entity to develop its own assumptions.
The determination of where assets
and liabilities fall within this hierarchy is based upon the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement.
Earnings (Loss) per Common
We report earnings (loss) per share
using a dual presentation of basic and diluted earnings (loss) per share. Basic earnings (loss) per share excludes the impact
of common stock equivalents. Diluted earnings (loss) per share utilizes the average market price per share when applying the treasury
stock method in determining common stock equivalents. At September 30, 2011 and 2010, there were no variances between the basic
and diluted loss per share as there were no potentially dilutive securities outstanding.
We account for income taxes as required
by the Income Tax Topic of the FASB ASC, which requires recognition of deferred tax liabilities and assets for the expected future
tax consequences of events that have been included in the financial statements or tax returns. Under this method, deferred tax
liabilities and assets are determined based on the difference between the financial statement and tax bases of assets and liabilities
using enacted tax rates in effect for the year in which the differences are expected to reverse.
We have analyzed filing positions
in all of the federal and state jurisdictions where we are required to file income tax returns, as well as all open tax years
in these jurisdictions. The Company has identified its federal tax return and its state tax return in Colorado as major
tax jurisdictions, as defined. We are not currently under examination by the Internal Revenue Service or any other jurisdiction.
The Company believes that its income tax filing positions and deductions will be sustained on audit and does not anticipate any
adjustments that will result in a material adverse effect on the Companys financial condition, results of operations, or
cash flow. Therefore, no reserves for uncertain income tax positions have been recorded.
The Company operates on a September
Stock-based compensation is accounted
for under ASC 718 (formerly - SFAS No. 123 (revised 2004)), "Share-Based Payment", using the modified prospective method.
ASC 718 requires the recognition of the cost of employee services received in exchange for an award of equity instruments in the
financial statements and is measured based on the grant date fair value of the award. ASC 718 also requires the stock option compensation
expense to be recognized over the period during which an employee is required to provide service in exchange for the award (generally
the vesting period).
Recently Issued Accounting
In June 2009, FASB approved the FASB
Accounting Standards FASB Accounting Standards Codification (FASB ASC) as the single source of authoritative non-governmental
GAAP. All existing accounting standard documents, such as FASB, American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, Emerging Issues
Task Force and other related literature, excluding guidance from the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), have
been superseded by the FASB ASC. All other non-grandfathered, non-SEC accounting literature not included in the FASB ASC has become
non-authoritative. The FASB ASC did not change GAAP, but instead introduced a new structure that combines all authoritative standards
into a comprehensive, topically organized online database. The FASB ASC was effective for us beginning September 15, 2009, and
impacts our financial statements, as all future references to authoritative accounting literature are now referenced in accordance
with the FASB ASC. There have been no changes to the content of our financial statements or disclosures as a result of implementing
the FASB ASC during the years ended September 30, 2010 and 2009.
In October 2009, the FASB issued
ASC 605 (formerly - ASU 2009-13), Revenue Recognition (Topic 605) Multiple-Deliverable Revenue Arrangements.
This ASU eliminates the requirement that all undelivered elements must have objective and reliable evidence of fair value before
a company can recognize the portion of the consideration that is attributable to items that already have been delivered. This
may allow some companies to recognize revenue on transactions that involve multiple deliverables earlier than under the current
requirements. Additionally, under the new guidance, the relative selling price method is required to be used in allocating consideration
between deliverables and the residual value method will no longer be permitted. This ASU is effective prospectively for revenue
arrangements entered into or materially modified beginning in fiscal 2011. A company may elect, but will not be required, to adopt
the amendments in this ASU retrospectively for all prior periods. We are currently evaluating the requirements of this ASU and
do not expect its provisions to have a material effect on our financial statements.
In April 2010, the FASB issued ASC
605 (formerly -ASU 2009-13), Revenue Recognition Milestone Method (Topic 605): Milestone Method of Revenue Recognition.
This ASU is effective on a prospective basis for milestones achieved in fiscal years, and interim periods within those years,
beginning on or after June 15, 2010. Early adoption is permitted. If a vendor elects early adoption and the period of adoption
is not the beginning of the entitys fiscal year, the entity should apply the amendments retrospectively from the beginning
of the year of adoption. We do not expect the provisions of this pronouncement to have a material effect on our financial statements.