FriendFinder Networks Inc. - FORM S-1/A

Attached files

• enter into transactions with affiliates; and
• engage in fundamental changes, dispositions or acquisitions with respect to all or any part of our business, property or assets.
As of the date of this prospectus, all of our domestic subsidiaries are set forth on Schedule A to this prospectus. Our foreign subsidiaries will not be subject to any of the restrictive covenants in the Senior Secured Notes Indenture. The restrictive covenants set forth in the Senior Secured Notes Indenture are subject to important exceptions and qualifications. See the section entitled “Description of Notes” for more information.

Conversion Rights

Risk Factors

Potential investors in the Senior Secured Notes should carefully consider the matters set forth under the caption Risk Factors prior to making an investment decision with respect to the Senior Secured Notes.

Use of Proceeds

We are not selling any securities under this prospectus and we will not receive any proceeds from the sale of Senior Secured Notes by the selling securityholders.

file	filename
EX-5.2 - EX-5.2 - FriendFinder Networks Inc.	d28931_ex5-2.htm
EX-5.3 - EX-5.3 - FriendFinder Networks Inc.	d28931_ex5-3.htm
EX-5.1 - EX-5.1 - FriendFinder Networks Inc.	d28931_ex5-1.htm

As filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 16 , 2011

Registration No. 333-177360

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO

FORM S-1

REGISTRATION STATEMENT UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933

FriendFinder Networks Inc.

Interactive Network, Inc.

*and the Subsidiary Guarantors listed on Schedule A hereto

(Exact Name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Nevada	7370	13-3750988
Nevada	7370	42-1745941
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)	(Primary Standard Industrial Classification Code Number)	(I.R.S. Employer Identification Number)

6800 Broken Sound Parkway, Suite 200
Boca Raton, Florida 33487
(561) 912-7000
(Address, including zip code, and telephone number, including area code, of registrant’s principal executive offices)


Marc H. Bell Chief Executive Officer and President FriendFinder Networks Inc. 6800 Broken Sound Parkway, Suite 200 Boca Raton, Florida 33487 Telephone: (561) 912-7000 (Name, address, including zip code, and telephone number, including area code, of agent for service)				Please send a copy of all communications to: Bradley D. Houser Esq. Akerman Senterfitt One Southeast Third Ave., 25th Floor Miami, Florida 33131-1714 Telephone: (305) 374-5600 Fax: (305) 374-5095

Approximate date of commencement of proposed sale to the public: From time to time after the effective date of this registration statement.

If any of the securities being registered on this Form are to be offered on a delayed or continuous basis pursuant to Rule 415 under the Securities Act of 1933 check the following box. [X]

If this Form is filed to register additional securities for an offering pursuant to Rule 462(b) under the Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering. [ ]

If this Form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to Rule 462(c) under the Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering. [ ]

If this Form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to Rule 462(d) under the Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering. [ ]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large accelerated filer

[ ]

Accelerated filer

[ ]

Non-accelerated filer

[X]

Smaller reporting company

[ ]

(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

CALCULATION OF REGISTRATION FEE

Title of each class of securities to be registered	Amount to be registered			Proposed maximum offering price per unit			Proposed maximum aggregate offering price			Amount of registration fee
14% Senior Secured Notes due 2013	$	235,331,887	⁽¹⁾		100	%⁽⁵⁾	$	235,331,887	⁽⁵⁾	$	26,969.03
Guarantees of the 14% Senior Secured Notes due 2013		—			—			—			—	⁽¹¹⁾
14% Cash Pay Secured Notes due 2013	$	10,630,667	⁽²⁾		100	%⁽⁶⁾	$	10,630,667	⁽⁶⁾	$	1,218.27
Guarantees of the 14% Cash Pay Secured Notes due 2013		—			—			—			—	⁽¹¹⁾
11.5% Convertible Non-Cash Pay Secured Notes due 2014	$	250,849,125	⁽³⁾		100	%⁽⁷⁾	$	250,849,125	⁽⁷⁾	$	28,747.31
Guarantees of the 11.5% Convertible Non-Cash Pay Secured Notes due 2014		—			—			—			—	⁽¹¹⁾
11.5% Convertible Non-Cash Pay Secured Notes due 2014 Paid-in-Kind	$	93,620,766	⁽⁴⁾		100	%	$	93,620,766	⁽⁴⁾	$	10,728.94
Common Stock, par value $0.001 per share, underlying the 11.5% Convertible Non-Cash Pay Notes		8,310,763	⁽⁸⁾		—			—			—	⁽⁸⁾
Common Stock, par value $0.001 per share		22,696,703	⁽⁹⁾	$	0.61	⁽¹⁰⁾	$	13,844,989	⁽¹⁰⁾	$	1,586.64
Aggregate number of shares being registered in this offering		31,007,466			—			—			—
Total amount of registration fee		—			—			—		$	69,250.19	⁽¹²⁾

(1)

Represents the aggregate principal amount of the 14% Senior Secured Notes due 2013 oustanding being registered.

(2)

Represents the aggregate principal amount of the 14% Cash Pay Secured Notes due 2013 outstanding being registered.

(3)

Represents the aggregate principal amount of the 11.5% Convertible Non-Cash Pay Secured Notes due 2014 outstanding, or $250,849,125, being registered.

(4)

Represents the aggregate principal amount of the 11.5% Convertible Non-Cash Pay Secured Notes due 2014 (the “Non-Cash Pay Notes”) that may be paid-in-kind in respect of future interest payments.

(5)

Estimated solely for the purpose of calculating the registration fee which was computed in accordance with Rule 457(o) under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”).

(6)

Estimated solely for the purpose of calculating the registration fee which was computed in accordance with Rule 457(o) under the Securities Act.

(7)

Estimated solely for the purpose of calculating the registration fee which was computed in accordance with Rule 457(o) under the Securities Act.

(8)

Based on the number of shares of common stock of FriendFinder Networks Inc. as may be issued upon conversion of all of the 11.5% Convertible Non-Cash Pay Secured Notes due 2014 registered hereby at a conversion price equal to the price per share of common stock offered upon the consummation of FriendFinder Networks Inc.’s initial public offering on May 16, 2011, or $10.00 per share; the shares are not subject to an additional fee pursuant to Rule 457(i) of the Securities Act.

(9)

Consists of shares held outright.

(10)

Estimated solely for the purpose of calculating the registration fee which was computed in accordance with Rule 457(c) under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. The calculations of the proposed maximum offering price per share and the proposed maximum aggregate offering price are based on the average of the high and low sale prices of FriendFinder Networks Inc.’s common stock on December 15 , 2011, as quoted on the NASDAQ Global Market.

(11)

Pursuant to Rule 457(n) of the Securities Act, no registration fee is required for the Guarantees.

(12)

Pursuant to Rule 457(p) of the Securities Act, we offset $58,705.58 which was previously paid in connection with a Registration Statement on Form S-4 filed on August 1, 2011, as amended, and withdrawn on October 17, 2011. We paid a total registration fee of $72,923.63 with the Registration Statement on Form S-1 filed on October 18, 2011.

The Registrants hereby amend this Registration Statement on such date or dates as may be necessary to delay its effective date until the Registrants shall file a further amendment which specifically states that this Registration Statement shall thereafter become effective in accordance with Section 8(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 or until the Registration Statement shall become effective on such date as the Commission acting pursuant to said Section 8(a), may determine.

Schedule A — Table of Subsidiary Guarantors

Exact Name of Subsidiary Guarantor	State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Formation	I.R.S. Employer Identification Number
Argus Payments Inc.	Delaware	45-2494661
Big Island Technology Group, Inc.	California	20-8009795
Blue Hen Group Inc.	Delaware	45-2539667
Confirm ID, Inc.	California	74-3037020
Danni Ashe, Inc.	California	95-4665271
Fastcupid, Inc.	California	20-2997869
Fierce Wombat Games Inc. (f/k/a Big Ego Games Inc.)	California	27-3532019
Flash Jigo Corp.	Delaware	27-4660821
FriendFinder California Inc.	California	77-0522750
FriendFinder Ventures Inc.	Nevada	27-4663125
FRNK Technology Group	California	94-3277102
General Media Art Holding, Inc.	Delaware	13-4042637
General Media Communications, Inc.	New York	13-3502237
General Media Entertainment, Inc.	New York	13-3592960
Global Alphabet, Inc.	California	77-0527649
GMCI Internet Operations, Inc.	New York	13-4097655
GMI On-Line Ventures, Ltd.	Delaware	13-4097656
Magnolia Blossom Inc.	Delaware	45-2538925
Medley.com Incorporated	California	03-0543594
NAFT News Corporation	California	27-3634385
Penthouse Digital Media Productions Inc.	New York	65-1251056
Penthouse Images Acquisitions, Ltd.	New York	13-3599228
Playtime Gaming Inc.	California	27-3634371
PerfectMatch Inc. (f/k/a Goldenrod Spear Inc.)	Delaware	45-2539020
PMGI Holdings Inc.	Delaware	20-1942663
PPM Technology Group, Inc.	California	20-8009876
Pure Entertainment Telecommunications, Inc.	New York	90-0209626
Sharkfish, Inc.	California	56-2471221
Snapshot Productions, LLC	Texas	46-0477091
Streamray Inc.	Nevada	88-0422716
Streamray Studios Inc.	California	26-4311009
Tan Door Media Inc.	California	26-4311100
Traffic Cat, Inc.	California	56-2471223
Transbloom, Inc.	California	74-3021168
Various, Inc.	California	77-0477762
Video Bliss, Inc.	California	95-4566760
West Coast Facilities Inc.	California	59-3814751
XVHUB Group Inc. (f/k/a Giant Swallowtail Inc.)	Delaware	45-2539401

The information in this prospectus is not complete and may be changed. The selling securityholders may not sell these securities until the registration statement filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission is effective. This prospectus is not an offer to sell these securities and it is not soliciting an offer to buy these securities in any state where the offer or sale is not permitted.

SUBJECT TO COMPLETION DATED DECEMBER 16 , 2011.

Prospectus

FRIENDFINDER NETWORKS INC.
INTERACTIVE NETWORK, INC.
$235,331,887 14% of Senior Secured Notes due 2013
$10,630,667 14% of Cash Pay Secured Notes due 2013
$344,469,891 11.5% of Convertible Non-Cash Pay Secured Notes due 2014
31,007,466 Shares of Common Stock

This prospectus will be used by selling securityholders to offer and sell from time to time up to an aggregate of (a) $235,331,887 principal amount of the 14% Senior Secured Notes due 2013 (the “Senior Secured Notes”); (b) $10,630,667 principal amount of the 14% Cash Pay Secured Notes due 2013 (the “Cash Pay Notes”); (c) $344,469,891 principal amount of the 11.5% Convertible Non-Cash Pay Secured Notes due 2014, which includes $93,620,766 of notes that may be paid-in-kind in respect of future interest payments, (the “Non-Cash Pay Notes” and, together with the Senior Notes and the Cash Pay Notes, collectively, the “Registrable Notes”); (d) 31,007,466 shares of common stock, consisting of i) 22,696,703 shares of our common stock held outright by various stockholders of FriendFinder Networks Inc. (the “Outstanding Shares”); and ii) 8,310,763 shares of our common stock issuable upon the conversion of all of the Non-Cash Pay Notes into shares of our common stock (the “Note Shares” and together with the Outstanding Shares, the “Registrable Shares”).

For information concerning the selling securityholders and the manner in which they may offer and sell our notes and shares of our common stock, see the sections entitled, “Selling Securityholders” and “Plan of Distribution” in this prospectus.

The Senior Secured Notes bear interest at a rate of 14.00% per annum. The Cash Pay Notes bear interest at a rate of 14.00% per annum. The Non-Cash Pay Notes bear interest at a rate of 11.50% per annum. Interest is payable quarterly, on March 31, June 30, September 30 and December 31 of each year, commencing December 31, 2010 for the Senior Secured Notes and the Cash Pay Notes, both which mature on September 30, 2013. Interest is payable semi-annually, on June 30 and December 31 of each year, commencing on December 31, 2010 for the Non-Cash Pay Notes, which matures on April 30, 2014.

The Senior Secured Notes, Cash Pay Notes and Non-Cash Pay Notes are each governed by an indenture, dated as of October 27, 2010, by and among Interactive Network, Inc. and FriendFinder Networks Inc. as co-issuers, all of our domestic subsidiaries as guarantors, and U.S. Bank, N.A. as the trustee, which we refer to as the “Senior Secured Notes Indenture,” the “Cash Pay Notes Indenture” and the “Non-Cash Pay Notes Indenture,” respectively (collectively, the “Indentures”). The Senior Secured Notes are guaranteed by all of our domestic subsidiaries on a secured first-priority basis. The Cash Pay Notes and Non-Cash Pay Notes are guaranteed by all of our domestic subsidiaries on a secured second-priority basis.

The Non-Cash Pay Notes are convertible into shares of our common stock at a conversion price equal to the price per share of common stock offered upon the consummation of our initial public offering on May 16, 2011, or $10.00 per share.

We are not selling any securities under this prospectus and we will not receive any proceeds from the sale by the selling securityholders of their securities. No consideration will be paid in connection with the conversion of the Non-Cash Pay Notes to Note Shares. The selling securityholders may sell all or a portion of the Registrable Notes and Registrable Shares from time to time in market transactions, in negotiated transactions or otherwise, and at prices and on terms that will be determined by the prevailing market price or at negotiated prices. For more information regarding the sales of the Registrable Notes and Registrable Shares by the selling securityholders pursuant to this prospectus, please read “Plan of Distribution.”

Currently, there is no trading market for the Registrable Notes.

Our common stock trades on the NASDAQ Global Market (“NASDAQ”). On December 1 5 , 2011, the last reported sales price of our common stock on the NASDAQ was $ 0. 59 per share.

Investing in the securities offered by this prospectus involves risks. See “Risk Factors,” beginning on page 12.

Neither the Securities and Exchange Commission nor any state securities commission has approved or disapproved of these securities or determined if this prospectus is truthful or complete. Any representation to the contrary is a criminal offense.

You should rely only on the information contained in this prospectus. We have not authorized any dealer, salesperson or other person to provide you with information concerning us, except for the information contained in this prospectus. The information contained in this prospectus is complete and accurate only as of the date on the front cover page of this prospectus, regardless of the time of delivery of this prospectus or the sale of any common stock. This prospectus is not an offer to sell these securities and we are not soliciting an offer to buy these securities in any state where the offer or sale is not permitted.

The date of this prospectus is [ ], 2011.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

				Page
SUMMARY					1
THE OFFERING					6
RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES					11
RISK FACTORS					12
USE OF PROCEEDS					37
DILUTION					37
SELLING SECURITYHOLDERS					38
BUSINESS					4 8
MARKET PRICE OF AND DIVIDENDS ON THE REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS					68
SELECTED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL DATA					69
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS					72
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS					11 1
DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS					114
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION					121
CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS					138
SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT					148
PLAN OF DISTRIBUTION					150
DESCRIPTION OF NOTES					152
DESCRIPTION OF CAPITAL STOCK					163
DESCRIPTION OF OTHER INDEBTEDNESS					169
INTERESTS OF NAMED EXPERTS AND COUNSEL					170
LEGAL MATTERS					170
EXPERTS					170
WHERE YOU CAN FIND MORE INFORMATION					170
INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS					F-1

SUMMARY

The following summary highlights selected information contained elsewhere in this prospectus and is qualified in its entirety by the more detailed information and consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this prospectus. This summary may not contain all of the information that may be important to you. You should carefully read this entire prospectus, including the section entitled “Risk Factors” and our consolidated financial statements and notes to those statements. As used in this prospectus, unless the context otherwise requires, all references to “we,” “us,” “our,” “our company” or “the company” refer to FriendFinder Networks Inc. and, where appropriate, our consolidated direct and indirect subsidiaries, except where it is clear that the terms mean only FriendFinder Networks Inc. The term “INI” refers to our subsidiary and co-issuer of the Registrable Notes, Interactive Network, Inc. References to our “common stock” refer only to our voting common stock and except as otherwise noted, such references do not include our Series B common stock or our preferred common stock.

Except where we state otherwise, the information presented in this prospectus reflects (i) the amendment and restatement of our bylaws, effective upon the consummation of our initial public offering on May 16, 2011, and (ii) the amendment and restatement of our articles of incorporation, which became effective on January 25, 2010.

About Our Company

FriendFinder Networks Inc. is a leading internet and technology company providing services in the rapidly expanding markets of social networking and web-based video sharing. Our business consists of creating and operating technology platforms which run several of the most heavily visited websites in the world. Through our extensive network of more than 44,000 websites, since our inception, we have built a base of more than 484 million registrants and more than 320 million members in more than 200 countries. We are able to create and maintain, in a cost-effective manner, websites intended to appeal to users of diverse cultures and interest groups. In December 2010, we had more than 196 million unique visitors to our network of websites, according to comScore. We offer our members a wide variety of online services so that they can interact with each other and access the content available on our websites. Our most heavily visited websites include AdultFriendFinder.com, Amigos.com, AsiaFriendFinder.com, Cams.com, FriendFinder.com, BigChurch.com and SeniorFriendFinder.com. For the nine months ended September 30, 2011, we had net revenue, income from operations and net losses of $249.6 million, $52.4 million and $(20.9) million, respectively. For the year ended December 31, 2010, we had net revenue, income from operations and net losses of $346.0 million, $71.1 million and ($43.2) million, respectively.

Our revenues to date have been primarily derived from online subscription and paid-usage for our products and services. These products and services are delivered primarily through two highly scalable revenue-generating technology platforms:

•

Social Networking. Approximately 69% of our total net revenues for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 70% of our total net revenues for the year ended December 31, 2010 were generated through our targeted social networking technology platform. Our social networking technology platform provides users who register or purchase subscriptions to one or more of our websites with the ability to communicate and to establish new connections with other users via our personal chat rooms, instant messaging and e-mail applications and to create, post and view content of interest. We have been able to rapidly create and seamlessly maintain multiple websites tailored to specific categories or genres and designed to cater to targeted audiences with mutual interests. We believe that our ability to create and operate a diverse network of specific interest websites with unique, user-generated content in a cost-effective manner is a significant competitive differentiator that allows us to implement a subscription-fee based revenue model while many other popular social networking websites rely primarily upon free-access, advertising-based revenue models.

•

Live Interactive Video. Approximately 24% of our total net revenues for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 22% of our total net revenues for the year ended December 31, 2010 were generated through our live interactive video technology platform. Our live interactive video technology platform is a live video broadcast platform that enables models to broadcast from independent studios throughout the world and interact with our users via instant messaging and video. We believe our live interactive video platform provides a unique offering including bi-directional and omni-directional video and interactive features that allow models to communicate with and attract users through a variety of mediums including

blogs, newsletters and video. In addition, we believe the reliability of our live interactive video technology platform, which had approximately 99.1% uptime during 2010, is a key factor allowing us to maintain a large base of users.

In addition to our revenue-generating technology platforms, we have invested significant time and resources into developing our back-end marketing, analytics and billing technologies, which are a key contributor to the success of our business. We have developed proprietary systems to allow our marketing affiliates to maximize their revenue for our mutual benefit. These systems include proprietary white-labeling solutions, in which we provide back-end technology solutions to permit affiliates and marketing partners to deliver our products and services while maintaining the affiliate’s and marketing partner’s own branding and style, self-optimizing ad spots, and a robust banner optimization engine that automatically chooses the best possible site and banner to promote in a given ad spot. Our marketing technology has also enabled the creation and continued growth of our network of more than 280,000 affiliates, which we believe is one of the largest of its kind in the world and a significant barrier to entry to potential and existing competitors. Similarly, our proprietary analytics technology provides us with an advantage relative to less sophisticated competitors by enabling us to estimate future revenue based on short-term response to our advertising campaigns, as well as providing for analysis of key data and metrics in order to optimize our marketing spend and maximize the revenues our websites generate. Our robust billing platform allows our customers to pay using many of the widely-adopted methods of e-commerce, both domestically as well as internationally.

We categorize our users into five categories: visitors, registrants, members, subscribers and paid users.

•

Visitors. Visitors are users who visit our websites but do not necessarily register. We believe we achieve large numbers of unique visitors because of our focus on continuously enhancing the user experience and expanding the breadth of our services. We had more than 196 million unique worldwide visitors in the month of December 2010, representing a growth of more than 300% from our approximately 46.9 million unique worldwide visitors in January 2009, according to comScore.

•

Registrants. Registrants are visitors who complete a free registration form on one of our websites by giving basic identification information and submitting their e-mail address. For the nine months ended September 30, 2011, we averaged more than 6.4 million new registrations on our websites each month. For the year ended December 31, 2010, we averaged more than 6.4 million new registrations on our websites each month. Some of our registrants are also members, as described below.

•

Members. Members are registrants who log into one of our websites and make use of our free products and services. For the nine months ended September 30, 2011, we averaged more than 4.0 million new members on our websites each month. For the year ended December 31, 2010, we averaged more than 3.9 million new members on our websites each month.

•

Subscribers. Subscribers are members who purchase daily, three-day, weekly, monthly, quarterly, annual or lifetime subscriptions for one or more of our websites. Subscribers have full access to our websites and may access special features. For the nine months ended September 30, 2011, we had a monthly average of approximately 950 thousand and for the year ended December 31, 2010, we had a monthly average of approximately 1 million paying subscribers.

•

Paid Users. Paid users are members who purchase products or services on a pay-by-usage basis. For the nine months ended September 30, 2011, we averaged approximately 2.9 million purchased minutes by paid users each month. For the year ended December 31, 2010, we averaged approximately 3.0 million purchased minutes by paid users each month.

We focus on the following key business metrics to evaluate the effectiveness of our operating strategies.

•

Average Revenue per Subscriber. We calculate average revenue per subscriber, or ARPU, by dividing net revenue for the period by the average number of subscribers in the period and by the number of months in the period. As such, our ARPU is a monthly calculation. For the nine months ended September 30, 2011, our average monthly revenue per subscriber was $20.22. For the year ended December 31, 2010, our average monthly revenue per subscriber was $20.49.

•

Churn. Churn is calculated by dividing terminations of subscriptions during the period by the total number of subscribers at the beginning of that period. Our average monthly churn rate, which measures the rate

of loss of subscribers, for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 was 16.3% per month. Our average monthly churn rate for the year ended December 31, 2010 was 16.1% per month.

•

Cost Per Gross Addition. Cost per gross addition, or CPGA, is calculated by adding affiliate commission expense plus ad buy expenses and dividing by new subscribers during the measurement period. Our CPGA for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 was $42.76. Our CPGA for the year ended December 31, 2010 was $47.25.

•

Average Lifetime Net Revenue Per Subscriber. Average Lifetime Net Revenue Per Subscriber is calculated by multiplying the average lifetime (in months) of a subscriber by ARPU for the measurement period and then subtracting the CPGA for the measurement period. Our Average Lifetime Net Revenue Per Subscriber for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 was $81.06. Our Average Lifetime Net Revenue Per Subscriber for the year ended December 31, 2010 was $80.17. While we monitor many statistics in the overall management of our business, we believe that Average Lifetime Net Revenue Per Subscriber and the number of subscribers are particularly helpful metrics for gaining a meaningful understanding of our business as they provide an indication of total revenue and profit generated from our base of subscribers inclusive of affiliate commissions and advertising costs required to generate new subscriptions.

In addition to our social networks and live interactive video platforms, we also offer professionally-generated content through our premium content technology platform and our non-internet entertainment business. Through websites such as Penthouse.com and HotBox.com, our subscribers and paid users have access to our collection of more than 15,000 hours of professional video, which includes our library of more than 800 standard and high-definition full-length feature films and one million professionally produced images. We began shooting all of our content in 3D in September 2010. Additionally, subscribers have access to editorial content, chat rooms and other interactive features. In addition to our online products and services, we also have a non-technology legacy entertainment business, in which we produce and distribute original pictorial and video content via traditional distribution channels including licensing and retail DVD channels, and license the globally-recognized Penthouse brand to a variety of consumer product companies and entertainment venues and public branded men’s lifestyle magazines.

Our Competitive Strengths

We believe that we have the following competitive strengths that we can leverage to implement our strategy:

•

Proprietary and Scalable Technology Platform. Our robust, proprietary and highly scalable technology platform supports our social networking, live interactive video and premium content websites. We are able to use our customized back-end interface to quickly and affordably generate new websites, launch new features and target new audiences at a relatively low incremental cost. We believe that our ability to create new websites and provide new features is crucial to cost-effectively maintaining our relationships with existing users and attracting new users.

•

Paid Subscriber-Based Model. We operate social networking websites that allow our members to make connections with other members with whom they share common interests. Our paid subscriber-based model of social networking websites is distinctly different from the business models of other free social networking websites whose users access the websites to remain connected to their pre-existing friends and interest groups.

•

Large and Diverse User Base. We operate some of the most heavily visited social networking websites in the world, currently adding on average more than 6.4 million new registrants and more than 4.0 million new members each month. Our websites are designed to appeal to individuals with a diversity of interests and backgrounds. We believe potential members are attracted to the opportunity to interact with other individuals by having access to our large, diverse user base.

•

Large and Difficult to Replicate Affiliate Network and Significant Marketing Spend. Our marketing affiliates are companies that market our services on their websites, allowing us to market our brand beyond our established user base. As of September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, we had more than 280,000 participants in our marketing affiliate program from which we derive a substantial portion of our new

members and approximately 46% of our net revenues for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 45% of our net revenues for the year ended December 31, 2010. We believe that the difficulty in building an affiliate network of this large size, together with our combined affiliate and advertising spend for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and the year ended December 31, 2010 of $64.5 million and $103.5 million, respectively, presents a significant barrier to entry for potential competitors.

Our Strategy

Our goal is to enhance revenue opportunities while improving our profitability. We plan to achieve these goals using the following strategies:

•

Convert Visitors, Registrants and Members into Subscribers or Paid Users. We continually seek to convert visitors, registrants and members into subscribers or paid users. We do this by constantly evaluating, adding and enhancing features on our websites to improve our users’ experience.

•

Create Additional Websites and Diversify Offerings. We are constantly seeking to identify groups of sufficient size who share a common interest in order to create a website intended to appeal to their interests. Our extensive user database serves as an existing source of potential members and subscribers for new websites we create.

•

Expand into and Monetize Current Foreign Markets. In 2010, nearly 71% of our members were outside the United States, but non-U.S. users accounted for less than half of our total net revenues. We seek to expand in selected geographic markets, including Southeast Europe, South America and Asia.

•

Pursue Targeted Acquisitions. We intend to expand our business by acquiring and integrating additional social networking websites, technology platforms, owners, creators and distributors of content and payment processing and advertising businesses. Our management team possesses significant mergers and acquisitions and integration expertise and regularly screens the marketplace for strategic acquisition opportunities.

•

Generate Online Advertising Revenue. To date, online advertising revenue has represented less than 0.1% of our net revenue, averaging approximately $8,000 per month in the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and $9,000 per month for the year ended December 31, 2010. With continued worldwide growth in this advertising segment, we see this as a significant growth opportunity. We believe that our broad and diverse user base represents a valuable asset that will provide opportunities for us to offer targeted online advertising to specific demographic groups. We intend to focus our advertising efforts on our general audience social networking websites and maintain our subscription-based model for our adult social networking websites.

Our New Financing

On October 27, 2010, we issued new debt to repay our then existing debt, which we refer to as the New Financing. We, along with our wholly-owned subsidiary Interactive Network, Inc., or INI, co-issued $305.0 million principal amount of the Senior Secured Notes, $13.8 million of the Cash Pay Notes, and $232.5 million of the Non-Cash Pay Notes.

Our Initial Public Offering

On May 16, 2011, we issued 5,000,000 shares of common stock at a price of $10.00 per share and completed our initial public offering (the “IPO”). We raised gross proceeds of $50.0 million, less underwriting fees and commissions of 7.25% of the gross proceeds, or $3.6 million, and incurred other offering expenses of $2.9 million to be paid from the proceeds of the offering, resulting in $43.5 million of net proceeds. In addition, we had incurred and paid as of December 31, 2010, $13.3 million of offering costs, which were included in deferred offering costs in the accompanying balance sheet at December 31, 2010 and written off by a charge to capital in excess of par value in the quarter ended June 30, 2011.

On May 19, 2011, we redeemed $37.8 million of our Senior Secured Notes and $1.7 million of our Cash Pay Notes for a total of $39.5 million principal amount of New Financing redeemed from the net proceeds of our IPO

and incurred a loss on extinguishment of debt estimated to be approximately $7.3 million. As of September 30, 2011, the outstanding principal amounts of the Senior Secured Notes, Cash Pay Notes and Non-Cash Pay Notes were $235.3 million, $10.6 million and $250.9 million, respectively.

Recent Developments

In July 2011, we acquired, through one of our subsidiaries, PerfectMatch.com, an online relationship service helping adults seeking successful, lasting connections. We paid approximately $2.5 million in cash and stock to acquire the assets of the website. PerfectMatch.com uses the Duet® Total Compatibility System, a system which analyzes the “whole person” to find friends, taking into account each member’s personality, values and ideals, life and love-style preferences to identify and find the person right for them. The acquisition of this website and related assets adds to our portfolio of general audience social networking websites.

In September 2011, we acquired, through one of our subsidiaries, BDM Global Ventures Ltd., the company which owns the operations of JigoCity. The acquisition was completed pursuant to an Agreement and Plan of Merger entered into on September 7, 2011 among us, JGC Holdings Limited, our wholly-owned subsidiary, BDM Global Ventures Limited, which we refer to as BDM, Global Investment Ventures LLC and Anthony R. Bobulinski, which we refer to as the Merger Agreement. Under the terms of the Merger Agreement, the shareholders of BDM, in exchange for their outstanding shares and options in BDM and its subsidiaries, received merger consideration consisting of 1,555,555, shares of our common stock, 500,000 of which will be held in escrow until no later than December 31, 2012, and warrants exercisable into 6,436,851 shares of our common stock with exercise prices ranging from $5-$18 per share with an expiration date of December 31, 2021. Pursuant to an equity put agreement we entered into, the shareholders of BDM have the option to sell all of the shares of our common stock and warrants issued as merger consideration back to us in exchange for the return of 70% of the equity in BDM if the volume-weighted average price of our common stock fails to equal or exceed $12.00 per share during any 10 trading day period principally between the closing date and the later of June 30, 2014 and the date upon which our current indentures are fully discharged, or if an “indenture modification” is made, as defined in the equity put agreement, the later of June 30, 2014 and the date the indenture modification takes place (the later date hereinafter referred to as the “Vesting Date”). The equity put agreement provides that the put right shall become exercisable at the sole discretion of the shareholders’ appointed representative during the period commencing on the Vesting Date and expiring sixty (60) days thereafter. Additionally, if the shareholders of BDM exercise the put right, we have the right to pay them in our common stock and/or cash, having a combined value as of the later of the above dates equal to the product of (i) 2,209,414 shares of common stock (subject to dilutive adjustment) and (ii) the difference between the highest 10 day volume-weighted average price attained by our common stock during such period and $12.00, in which case the put right terminates. Pursuant to a registration rights agreement, we also granted demand registration rights under certain circumstances, with respect to the shares of our common stock and warrants issued as merger consideration. JigoCity is a global social commerce organization committed to providing members with high quality daily deals that are relevant to their individual lifestyles. The acquisition of JigoCity adds to our portfolio a social commerce company and what we believe will be an additional avenue to monetize our foreign markets.

Our Corporate Information

Our executive offices are located at 6800 Broken Sound Parkway, Suite 200, Boca Raton, Florida 33487 and our telephone number is (561) 912-7000. Our website address is www.ffn.com. The information contained in, or accessible through, our website is not part of this prospectus.

THE OFFERING

The following summary of the Registrable Notes and Registrable Shares is provided solely for your convenience. This summary is not intended to be complete. You should read the full text and more specific details contained elsewhere in this prospectus, including a more detailed summary of the terms of the Registrable Notes under the section in this prospectus entitled “Description of Notes” and a more detailed summary of the Registrable Shares under the section in this prospectus entitled “Description of Capital Stock.” The terms of the Registrable Notes are qualified by reference to the Indentures.

14% Senior Secured Notes Due 2013 (the “Senior Secured Notes”)

Issuers				FriendFinder Networks Inc. and Interactive Network, Inc., as co-issuers.
Notes Offered by the Selling Securityholders				Up to $ 235,331,887 aggregate principal amount of 14% Senior Secured Notes due 2013 (the “Senior Secured Notes”).
Maturity Date				September 30, 2013.
Interest Payment Dates				Quarterly, on March 31, June 30, September 30 and December 31 of each year, commencing December 31, 2010.
Subsidiary Guarantees				Each of our domestic subsidiaries set forth on Schedule A to this prospectus have guaranteed the Senior Secured Notes. The Senior Secured Notes may be guaranteed by additional subsidiaries in the future under certain circumstances.
Ranking				The Senior Secured Notes and the guarantees are our and the guarantors’ senior first-priority secured obligations and are: • secured on a first-priority basis, by liens on all of our and the guarantors’ assets, including without limitation, receivables, inventory, furniture, fixtures, equipment, trademarks, copyrights and other intangibles, real property and the capital stock of subsidiaries, including a 100% pledge of the co-issuers’ stock, subject to customary exceptions; • senior in right of payment to the Non-Cash Pay Notes, but not the Cash Pay Notes with certain exceptions; and • pari passu in right of payment to the Cash Pay Notes, with certain exceptions.
Optional Redemption				The Senior Secured Notes are redeemable prior to maturity at our option in whole but not in part, at 110% of principal, plus accrued and unpaid interest.
Change of Control				Upon a change of control (as defined in the section entitled “Description of Notes”), we must offer to repurchase the Senior Secured Notes at 110% of the principal amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest to the purchase date.
Certain Covenants				The Senior Secured Notes Indenture contains certain covenants, including limitations and restrictions on our and our domestic subsidiaries’ ability to: • incur additional indebtedness; • make dividend payments or other restricted payments; • create liens; • change the nature of its business • modify the provisions of any indebtedness, organizational documents and certain other agreements;

14% Cash Pay Secured Notes Due 2013 (the “Cash Pay Notes”)

Issuers				FriendFinder Networks Inc. and Interactive Network, Inc., as co-issuers.
Notes Offered by the Selling Securityholders				Up to $10,630,667 aggregate principal amount of 14% Cash Pay Secured Notes Due 2013 (the “Cash Pay Notes”).
Maturity Date				September 30, 2013.
Interest Payment Dates				Quarterly, on March 31, June 30, September 30 and December 31 of each year, commencing December 31, 2010.
Subsidiary Guarantees				Each of our domestic subsidiaries set forth on Schedule A to this prospectus have guaranteed the Cash Pay Notes. The Cash Pay Notes may be guaranteed by additional subsidiaries in the future under certain circumstances.
Ranking				The Cash Pay Notes and the guarantees are our and the guarantors’ subordinated second-priority secured obligations and are: • secured on a second-priority basis, by liens on all of our and the guarantors’ assets, including without limitation, receivables, inventory, furniture, fixtures, equipment, trademarks, copyrights and other intangibles, real property and the capital stock of subsidiaries, including a 100% pledge of the co-issuers’ stock, subject to customary exceptions; and • pari passu in right of payment to the Senior Secured Notes, with certain exceptions.
Optional Redemption				The New Cash-Pay Notes are redeemable prior to maturity at our option in whole but not in part, at 110% of principal, plus accrued and unpaid interest. See the section entitled “Description of Notes” for more information.

11.5% Convertible Non-Cash Pay Secured Notes Due 2014 (the “Non-Cash Pay Notes”)

Conversion Rights				Pursuant to Non-Cash Pay Notes Indenture, you may opt to convert your Non-Cash Pay Notes, or any portion of the principal amount thereof, into shares of our common stock at a conversion price equal to the price per share of common stock offered upon the consummation of our initial public offering on May 16, 2011, or $10.00 per share, up until the close of business on the day prior to the date of payment in full of the Non-Cash Pay Notes. The aggregate shares of our common stock available in such conversion shall be limited to 8,310,763 shares of our common stock, or approximately 21.1% of our fully diluted equity as of the date our initial public offering was consummated, pursuant to the Non-Cash Pay Notes Indenture. For more information on your conversion rights, see the section entitled, “Description of Notes.”
Risk Factors				Potential investors in the Non-Cash Pay Notes should carefully consider the matters set forth under the caption Risk Factors prior to making an investment decision with respect to the Non-Cash Pay Notes and/or converting the Non-Cash Pay Notes to shares of our common stock.
Use of Proceeds				We are not selling any securities under this prospectus and we will not receive any proceeds from the sale of Non-Cash Pay Notes by the selling securityholders.

The Registrable Shares

RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES

For purposes of calculating the ratio of earnings to fixed charges, earnings consists of income or loss before income taxes plus fixed charges and fixed charges consist of interest expense (including amortized discount and deferred debt costs), interest related to VAT liability not charged to customers and the interest element of rent expense. Earnings are inadequate to cover fixed charges and therefore result in deficiencies amounting to approximately $49.9 million in 2006, $36.3 million in 2007, $64.1 million in 2008, $46.5 million in 2009, $43.6 million in 2010, and $19.7 million and $26.5 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2011 respectively. Although we previously had shares of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock and Series B Convertible Preferred Stock outstanding, no preference dividends were paid for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009 and 2010 nor for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2011. Please refer to Exhibit 12.1 filed with this Registration Statement on Form S-1, of which this prospectus forms a part, which sets forth the computation of the ratio of earnings to fixed charges.

RISK FACTORS

Our business, financial condition, results of operations, cash flows and prospects, and the prevailing market price and performance of our common stock, may be adversely affected by a number of factors, including the matters discussed below. Certain statements and information set forth in this registration statement, as well as other written or oral statements made from time to time by us or by our authorized officers on our behalf, constitute “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Federal Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. We intend for our forward-looking statements to be covered by the safe harbor provisions for forward-looking statements contained in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. You should note that forward-looking statements in this document speak only as of the date of this registration statement and we undertake no duty or obligation to update or revise our forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. Although we believe that the expectations, plans, intentions and projections reflected in our forward-looking statements are reasonable, such statements are subject to risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause our actual results, performance or achievements to be materially different from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements. The risks, uncertainties and other factors that our stockholders and prospective investors should consider include the following:

Risks Related to the Registrable Notes

We may not have the funds, or the ability to raise the funds, necessary to service our indebtedness or repay the Registrable Notes when they become due.

To service our indebtedness, we will require a significant amount of cash. Our ability to maintain our current cash position or generate cash depends on many factors beyond our control. Our ability to make payments on and to refinance our indebtedness, including the Registrable Notes, and to fund operations will depend on existing cash balances and our ability to generate cash in the future. This, to a certain extent, is subject to general economic, financial, competitive and other factors, such as consumer preferences, that are beyond our control. We may not be able to generate sufficient cash flow from operations and future borrowings may not be available to us in an amount sufficient to service our indebtedness, including the Registrable Notes. We may need to refinance all or a portion of our indebtedness, including the Registrable Notes, on or before maturity. We cannot assure you that we will be able to refinance any of our indebtedness, including the Registrable Notes, on commercially reasonable terms or at all.

There may not be sufficient collateral to pay all or any portion of the Registrable Notes.

No appraisals of any collateral have been prepared. The value of collateral at any time will depend on market and other economic conditions, including the availability of suitable buyers for the collateral. By their nature, some or all of the pledged assets may be illiquid and may have no readily ascertainable market value. The value of the assets pledged as collateral for the Registrable Notes and the guarantees of the Registrable Notes could be impaired in the future as a result of changing economic conditions, our failure to implement our business strategy, competition or other future trends or uncertainties.

The proceeds of any sale of the collateral following a default by us may not be sufficient to satisfy the amounts due on the Registrable Notes. No appraisal of the fair market value of the collateral has been prepared and we therefore cannot assure you that the value of the noteholders’ interest in the collateral equals or exceeds the principal amount of the Registrable Notes. If the value of the collateral is less than the principal amount of the Registrable Notes, then in the event of bankruptcy, you will have only an unsecured claim against FFN, INI and the subsidiary guarantors to the extent of such shortfall.

The value of the collateral securing the Registrable Notes may not be sufficient to secure post-petition interest.

In the event of a bankruptcy, liquidation, dissolution, reorganization or similar proceeding against us, holders of the Registrable Notes will only be entitled to post-petition interest, fees, costs or charges under U.S. bankruptcy laws to the extent that the value of their security interest in the collateral is greater than the amount of their pre-bankruptcy claim. Holders of the Registrable Notes that have a security interest in collateral with a value equal or less than their pre-bankruptcy claim will not be entitled to post-petition interest under U.S. bankruptcy laws.

No appraisal of the fair market value of the collateral has been prepared in connection with this offering and we therefore cannot assure you that the value of the noteholders’ interest in the collateral equals or exceeds the principal amounts of each of the Registrable Notes. If the value of the collateral is less than the principal amount of the Registrable Notes, then in the event of bankruptcy, you will only have an unsecured claim against FriendFinder, INI and the subsidiary guarantors to the extent of such shortfall. See “—There may not be sufficient collateral to pay all or any portion of the Registrable Notes.”

Your interest in the collateral may be adversely affected by the failure to record/and/or perfect security interests in certain collateral.

The security interests in the collateral securing the Registrable Notes include a pledge of certain equity interests and a pledge or security interest in, or lien on, assets, whether now owned or acquired or arising in the future. Applicable law requires that certain property and rights acquired after the grant of a general security interest can only be perfected at the time such property and rights are acquired and identified. Although the agreements governing the Registrable Notes will contain customary further assurances and covenants, the collateral agent under the new agreements governing the Registrable Notes will not monitor the future acquisition or property and rights that constitute collateral.

We may not be able to satisfy our repayment obligations in the event of a change of control because we may lack the funds to do so.

Upon a change of control, each holder of the Registrable Notes will have the right to require us to repurchase their Notes in full at 110% of their principal amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest to the date of repurchase. Any future agreement governing any of our indebtedness may contain similar provisions. Accordingly, it is possible that we will not be able to satisfy our repurchase obligations of the Registrable Notes and future indebtedness upon a change of control because we may not have sufficient funds available to do so.

We breached certain covenants contained in our previously existing note agreements and our Indentures. If we were to breach the covenants contained under our Indentures, which include that we must maintain certain financial ratios, satisfy certain financial tests and remain in compliance with our Indentures, we may be restricted in the way we run our business.

Our previously existing note agreements required, and the Indentures governing our Registrable Notes require us to maintain certain financial ratios as well as comply with other financial covenants relating to minimum consolidated EBITDA and minimum consolidated coverage ratio and permitted investments. We and INI failed to comply with certain covenants contained within some of our previously existing note agreements and our Indentures.

On February 4, 2011, excess cash flow payments of $10.5 million and $0.5 million were paid under our Indentures to the holders of the Senior Secured Notes and Cash Pay Notes, respectively, which payments were in amounts equal to 102% of the principal amounts repaid, amounting to total principal reductions of $10.3 million and $0.5 million for the Senior Secured Notes and Cash Pay Notes, respectively. In the process of calculating the excess cash flow payments on February 4, 2011, we inadvertently used the methodology we applied pursuant to our previously existing note agreements, rather than the methodology from the New Financing.

This error resulted in underpayments of $3.9 million on the Senior Secured Notes and $0.2 million on the Cash Pay Notes, causing an event of default under each of those notes. Upon discovery of the error on February 28, 2011, we recalculated the excess cash flow payments and, on March 2, 2011, we made additional excess cash flow payments in amounts sufficient to cure the underpayments and cure the related event of default, which resulted in further principal reductions of $3.8 million and $0.2 million for the Senior Secured Notes and Cash Pay Notes, respectively.

If events of default occur in the future under any of the Indentures for our Registrable Notes and our efforts to cure such events of default are unsuccessful, it could result in the acceleration of our then-outstanding debt. If all of our indebtedness was accelerated as a result of an event of default, we may not have sufficient funds at the time of acceleration to repay most of our indebtedness and we may not be able to find additional or alternative

financing to refinance any such accelerated obligations on terms acceptable to us or on any terms, which could have a material adverse effect on our ability to continue as a going concern.

If we do not maintain certain financial ratios, satisfy certain financial tests and remain in compliance with our Indentures, we may be restricted in the way we run our business.

Our Indentures contain certain financial covenants and restrictions requiring us to maintain specified financial ratios and satisfy certain financial tests. As a result of these covenants and restrictions, we are limited in how we conduct our business and we may be unable to raise additional debt or equity financing, compete effectively or take advantage of new business opportunities.

Our failure to comply with the covenants and restrictions contained in our Indentures could lead to a default under these instruments. If such a default occurs and we are unable to cure such default or obtain a waiver, the holders of the debt in default could accelerate the maturity of the related debt, which in turn could trigger the cross-default and cross-acceleration provisions of our other financing agreements. If any of these events occur, we cannot assure you that we will have sufficient funds available to pay in full the total amount of obligations that become due as a result of any such acceleration, or that we will be able to find additional or alternative financing to refinance any such accelerated obligations on terms acceptable to us or on any terms.

We have defaulted on certain terms of our indebtedness in the past and we cannot assure you that we will be able to remain in compliance with these covenants in the future and, if we fail to do so, we cannot assure you that we will be able to cure such default, obtain waivers from the holders of the debt and/or amend the covenants as we have in the past. For more information regarding the potential risks associated with our breach of covenants on certain of our indebtedness see the risk factor entitled “We breached certain covenants contained in our previously existing note agreements and our Indentures. If we were to breach the covenants contained under our Indentures, which include that we must maintain certain financial ratios, satisfy certain financial tests and remain in compliance with our Indentures, we may be restricted in the way we run our business.”

There is no public market for the Registrable Notes.

We do not intend to list the Registrable Notes on any securities exchange. We cannot assure you that an active trading market for the Registrable Notes will develop. If the Registrable Notes are traded, they may trade at a discount from their initial offering price, depending on a number of factors, including:

•

the number of noteholders;

•

our operating performance and financial condition;

•

the market for similar securities;

•

the interest of securities dealers in making a market in the Registrable Notes; and

•

prevailing interest rates.

Historically, the market for non-investment grade debt has been subject to disruptions that have caused substantial volatility in the prices of these securities. We do not assure you that the market for the Registrable Notes will be free from similar disruptions. Any disruptions could have an adverse effect on noteholders.

Fraudulent conveyance laws may permit courts to void the subsidiary guarantees of the notes in specific circumstances, which would interfere with the payment of the subsidiary guarantees.

Under the federal bankruptcy laws and comparable provisions of state fraudulent transfer laws, any guarantee made by any of our subsidiaries could be voided, or claims under the guarantee made by any of our subsidiaries could be subordinated to all other obligations of any such subsidiary, if the subsidiary, at the time it incurred the obligations under any guarantee:

•

incurred the obligations with the intent to hinder, delay or defraud creditors; or

•

received less than reasonably equivalent value, or did not receive fair consideration, in exchange for incurring those obligations; and

(1)

was insolvent or rendered insolvent by reason of that incurrence;

(2)

was engaged in a business or transaction for which the subsidiary’s remaining assets constituted unreasonably small capital; or

(3)

intended to incur, or believed that it would incur, debts beyond its ability to pay those debts as they mature.

In addition, any payment by that guarantor pursuant to its guarantee could be voided and required to be returned to the guarantor, or to a fund for the benefit of the creditors of the guarantor. In any such case, your right to receive payments in respect of the notes from any such guarantor would be structurally subordinated to all indebtedness and other liabilities of that guarantor.

A legal challenge to the obligations under any guarantee on fraudulent conveyance grounds could focus on any benefits received in exchange for the incurrence of those obligations. We believe that each of our subsidiaries making a guarantee received reasonably equivalent value for incurring the guarantee, but a court may disagree with our conclusion or elect to apply a different standard in making its determination.

The measures of insolvency for purposes of the fraudulent transfer laws vary depending on the law applied in the proceeding to determine whether a fraudulent transfer has occurred. Generally, however, an entity would be considered insolvent if:

•

the sum of its debts, including contingent liabilities, is greater than the fair saleable value of all of its assets;

•

the present fair saleable value of its assets is less than the amount that would be required to pay its probable liabilities on its existing debts, including contingent liabilities, as they become absolute and mature; or

•

it cannot pay its debts as they become due.

We cannot assure you, however, as to what standard a court would apply in making these determinations. If a guarantee of the notes is voided as a fraudulent conveyance or is found to be unenforceable for any other reason, you will not have a claim against the guarantor.

Risks Related to our Common Stock

Purchasers of Registrable Shares from the selling securityholders may experience dilution.

Sales of Registrable Shares by the selling securityholders will not result in a change in the net tangible book value deficiency per share before and after the distribution of shares by the selling securityholders. However, purchasers of Registrable Shares from the selling securityholders will experience dilution to the extent of the excess of the amount per share paid over the net tangible book value deficiency per share of our common stock at the time of the purchase. Net tangible book value deficiency per share represents the amount that the total liabilities exceeds total tangible assets divided by the number of outstanding shares of our common stock. Any future equity issuances and future exercises of employee stock options or future exercises of outstanding warrants to purchase our common stock may also have a dilutive impact on the holders of our common stock.

Our executive officers, directors and their affiliates own a substantial percentage of our common stock, which may allow them to control matters requiring stockholder approval. They could also make business decisions for us with which you disagree and that cause our stock price to decline.

As of December 14 , 2011, our executive officers, directors and their affiliates beneficially own approximately 41% of our common stock. As a result, if they act in concert, they may be able to control matters requiring approval by our stockholders, including the election of directors, and could have the ability to prevent or approve a corporate transaction, even if other stockholders, including those who acquire shares subsequent to these exchange offers, oppose such action. This concentration of voting power could also have the effect of delaying, deterring, or preventing a change of control or other business combination, which could cause our stock price to decline.

There are a large number of shares of common stock outstanding, and a significant number of authorized but not issued shares of common stock which may be sold in the future and may cause the prevailing market price of our common stock to decrease and impair our capital raising abilities.

As of December 14 , 2011, 31,219,644 shares of common stock are issued and outstanding and an additional 81,280,356 shares of our voting common stock are authorized and available for issuance, which we may, in general, issue without any action or approval by our stockholders, including in connection with acquisitions or otherwise except as required by relevant stock exchange requirements.

The market price for our common stock could decline as a result of sales of a large number of shares of our common stock in the market after this offering, and even the perception that these sales could occur may depress the market price. The sale of shares issued upon the exercise or conversion of our derivative securities could also further dilute your investment in our common stock. Further, the sale of any of the foregoing shares could impair our ability to raise capital through the sale of additional equity securities.

Public interest group actions targeted at our stockholders may cause the prevailing market price of our common stock to decrease and impair our capital raising abilities.

Public interest groups may target our stockholders, particularly institutional stockholders, seeking to cause those stockholders to divest their holdings of our securities because of the adult-oriented nature of parts of our business. The sale by any institutional investor of its holdings of our common stock, and the reluctance of other institutional investors to invest in our securities, because of such public interest group actions, or the threat of such actions, could cause the market price of our common stock to decline and could impair our ability to raise capital through the sale of additional equity securities.

We will continue to incur increased costs as a result of being a public company.

As a public company, we will continue to incur increased legal, accounting and other costs not incurred as a private company. The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and related rules and regulations of the SEC and NASDAQ regulate the corporate governance practices of public companies. We expect that compliance with these requirements will increase our expenses and make some activities more time consuming than they have been in the past when we were a private company. Although we are currently unable to estimate these increased costs with any degree of certainty, such additional costs going forward could negatively impact our financial results.

Failure to achieve and maintain effective internal controls in accordance with Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act could have a material adverse effect on our ability to produce accurate financial statements and on our stock price.

Pursuant to Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, we will be required to furnish a report by our management on our internal control over financial reporting. We have not been subject to these requirements in the past. The internal control report must contain (a) a statement of management’s responsibility for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, (b) a statement identifying the framework used by management to conduct the required evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting, and (c) management’s assessment of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of the end of our most recent fiscal year, including a statement as to whether or not internal control over financial reporting is effective.

To achieve compliance with Section 404 within the prescribed period, we will be engaged in a process to document and evaluate our internal control over financial reporting, which is both costly and challenging. In this regard, we will need to dedicate internal resources, engage outside consultants and adopt a detailed work plan to (a) assess and document the adequacy of internal control over financial reporting, (b) take steps to improve control processes where appropriate, (c) validate through testing that controls are functioning as documented, and (d) implement a continuous reporting and improvement process for internal control over financial reporting. Despite our efforts, we can provide no assurance as to our, or our independent registered public accounting firm’s, conclusions with respect to the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting under Section 404. There is a risk that neither we nor our independent registered public accounting firm will be able to conclude within the

prescribed timeframe that our internal controls over financial reporting are effective as required by Section 404. This could result in an adverse reaction in the financial markets due to a loss of confidence in the reliability of our financial statements.

We do not intend to pay dividends in the foreseeable future.

You should not rely on an investment in our common stock to provide dividend income. We do not currently pay any cash dividends on our common stock and do not anticipate paying any cash dividends in the foreseeable future. We intend to retain future earnings to fund our growth and repay existing indebtedness. In addition, our ability to pay dividends is prohibited by the terms of our currently outstanding notes and we expect that any future credit facility will contain terms prohibiting or limiting the amount of dividends that may be declared or paid on our common stock. Accordingly, you will receive a return on your investment in our common stock only if our common stock appreciates in value. You may therefore not realize a return on your investment even if you sell your shares.

Our stock price may be volatile, and you may not be able to resell shares of our common stock at or above the price you paid.

Our common stock has been traded on NASDAQ since May 11, 2011. The trading price of our common stock subsequent to our initial public offering has been volatile and may continue to be highly volatile and could be subject to wide fluctuations in price in response to various factors, some of which are beyond our control. These factors include:

•

Quarterly variations in our results of operations or those of our competitors.

•

Announcements by us or our competitors of acquisitions, new products, significant contracts, commercial relationships or capital commitments.

•

Disruption to our operations or those of our marketing affiliates.

•

The emergence of new sales channels in which we are unable to compete effectively.

•

Our ability to develop and market new and enhanced products on a timely basis.

•

Commencement of, or our involvement in, litigation.

•

Any major change in our board or management.

•

Changes in governmental regulations or in the status of our regulatory approvals.

•

Changes in earnings estimates or recommendations by securities analysts.

•

General economic conditions and slow or negative growth of related markets.

In addition, the stock market in general, and the market for technology companies in particular, have experienced extreme price and volume fluctuations that have often been unrelated or disproportionate to the operating performance of those companies. These broad market and industry factors may seriously harm the market price of our common stock, regardless of our actual operating performance. In addition, in the past, following periods of volatility in the overall market and the market price of a company’s securities, securities class action litigation has often been instituted against these companies. This litigation, if instituted against us, could result in substantial costs and a diversion of our management’s attention and resources.

If the minimum bid price of our common stock remains below $1.00, our common stock may be delisted by NASDAQ, which could limit your ability to sell shares of our common stock and could limit our ability to raise additional capital.

We need to maintain certain financial and corporate governance qualifications in order to maintain the listing of our shares of common stock on NASDAQ. One of these requirements is that we maintain a minimum bid price for our shares of common stock of $1.00. On December 1 5 , 2011, the last reported sales price of our common stock on NASDAQ was $ 0. 59 per share. If the shares of our common stock were to continue to trade below the $1.00

minimum bid price for 30 consecutive days, NASDAQ would send us a deficiency notice advising us that we have 180 calendar days to regain compliance with the applicable requirements. We cannot assure you that we will at all times meet the criteria for continued listing, including that our stock price will meet the minimum bid price requirement under NASDAQ’s rules. If our common stock were to be delisted from NASDAQ, the market for your shares may be limited, and as a result, you may not be able to sell your shares at an acceptable price, or at all. In addition, a delisting may make it more difficult or expensive for us to raise additional capital in the future.

Anti-takeover provisions in our articles of incorporation and bylaws or provisions of Nevada law could prevent or delay a change in control, even if a change of control would benefit our stockholders.

Provisions of our articles of incorporation and our bylaws, as well as provisions of Nevada law, could discourage, delay or prevent a merger, acquisition or other change in control, even if a change in control would benefit our stockholders. These provisions:

•

establish advance notice requirements for nominations for election to the board of directors or for proposing matters that can be acted upon by stockholders at stockholder meetings;

•

authorize our board of directors to issue “blank check” preferred stock to increase the number of outstanding shares and thwart a takeover attempt;

•

require the written request of at least 75% of the voting power of our capital stock in order to compel management to call a special meeting of the stockholders; and

•

prohibit stockholder action by written consent and require that all stockholder actions be taken at a meeting of our stockholders, unless otherwise specifically required by our articles of incorporation or the Nevada Revised Statutes.

In addition, the Nevada Revised Statutes contain provisions governing the acquisition of a controlling interest in certain Nevada corporations. These laws provide generally that any person that acquires 20% or more of the outstanding voting shares of certain Nevada corporations in the secondary public or private market must follow certain formalities before such acquisition or they may be denied voting rights, unless a majority of the disinterested stockholders of the corporation elects to restore such voting rights in whole or in part. These laws will apply to us if we have 200 or more stockholders of record, at least 100 of whom have addresses in Nevada, unless our articles of incorporation or our bylaws in effect on the tenth day after the acquisition of a controlling interest provide otherwise. These laws provide that a person acquires a “controlling interest” whenever a person acquires shares of a subject corporation that, but for the application of these provisions of the Nevada Revised Statutes, would enable that person to exercise (1) one-fifth or more, but less than one-third, (2) one-third or more, but less than a majority or (3) a majority or more, of all of the voting power of the corporation in the election of directors. Once an acquirer crosses one of these thresholds, shares which it acquired in the transaction taking it over the threshold and within the 90 days immediately preceding the date when the acquiring person acquired or offered to acquire a controlling interest become “control shares.” These laws may have a chilling effect on certain transactions if our articles of incorporation or our bylaws are not amended to provide that these provisions do not apply to us or to an acquisition of a controlling interest, or if our disinterested stockholders do not confer voting rights in the control shares.

Nevada law also provides that if a person is the “beneficial owner” of 10% or more of the voting power of certain Nevada corporations, such person is an “interested stockholder” and may not engage in any “combination” with the corporation for a period of three years from the date such person first became an interested stockholder, unless the combination or the transaction by which the person first became an interested stockholder is approved by the board of directors of the corporation before the person first became an interested stockholder. Another exception to this prohibition is if the combination is approved by the affirmative vote of the holders of stock representing a majority of the outstanding voting power not beneficially owned by the interested stockholder at a meeting called for that purpose, no earlier than three years after the date that the person first became an interested stockholder. These laws generally apply to Nevada corporations with 200 or more stockholders of record, but a Nevada corporation may elect in its articles of incorporation not to be governed by these particular laws. We have made such an election in our articles of incorporation. Nevada law also provides that directors may resist a change or potential change in control if the directors determine that the change is opposed to, or not in the best interest of, the corporation.

Risks Related to our High Level of Indebtedness

Our indebtedness could make obtaining additional capital resources difficult and could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and our growth strategy.

As of September 30, 2011, the outstanding principal balances under our Senior Secured Notes, Cash Pay Notes and Non-Cash Pay Notes, were $235.3 million, $10.6 million and $250.9 million, respectively. We will require additional capital resources in the future and there can be no assurance that such funds will be available to us on favorable terms, or at all. The unavailability of funds could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations and ability to expand our operations. Remaining indebtedness after this offering could materially adversely affect us in a number of ways, including the following:

•

we may be unable to obtain additional financing for working capital, capital expenditures, acquisitions, repayment of debt at maturity and other general corporate purposes;

•

a significant portion of our cash flow from operations must be dedicated to debt service, which reduces the amount of cash we have available for other purposes;

•

we may be disadvantaged as compared to our competitors, such as in our ability to adjust to changing market conditions, as a result of the amount of debt we owe;

•

we may be restricted in our ability to make strategic acquisitions and to exploit business opportunities; and

•

additional dilution of stockholders may be required to service our debt.

Moreover, our Indentures contain covenants that limit our actions. These covenants could materially and adversely affect our ability to finance our future operations or capital needs or to engage in other business activities that may be in our best interest. The covenants limit our ability to, among other things:

•

incur or guarantee additional indebtedness;

•

repurchase capital stock;

•

make loans and investments;

•

enter into agreements restricting our subsidiaries’ abilities to pay dividends;

•

grant liens on assets;

•

sell or otherwise dispose of assets;

•

enter new lines of business;

•

merge or consolidate with other entities; and

•

engage in transactions with affiliates.

Servicing our indebtedness will require a significant amount of cash. Our ability to generate cash depends on many factors beyond our control.

Our ability to make payments on our indebtedness and to fund planned capital expenditures will depend on our ability to generate cash in the future. This, to a certain extent, is subject to general economic, financial, competitive, legislative, regulatory and other factors that are beyond our control.

Our business may not be able to generate sufficient cash flow from operations or future borrowings may not be available to us in an amount sufficient to enable us to pay our indebtedness or debt securities, including the Registrable Notes, or to fund our other liquidity needs. As a result, we may need to refinance all or a portion of our indebtedness on or before maturity. However, we may not be able to complete such refinancing on commercially reasonable terms or at all.

Risks Related to our Business and Industry

We have a history of significant net losses and we may incur additional net losses in the future, which have had and may continue to have material consequences to our business.

We have historically generated significant net losses. As of September 30, 2011, we had an accumulated deficit of approximately $251.6 million. For the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and the year ended December 31,

2010, we had a net loss of $20.9 million and $43.2 million, respectively. For the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, we had net losses of approximately $41.2 million and $46.0 million, respectively. We expect our operating expenses will continue to increase during the next several years as a result of additional costs incurred related to our status as a public company, the promotion of our services and the expansion of our operations, including the launch of new websites and entering into acquisitions, strategic alliances and joint ventures. If our revenue does not grow at a substantially faster rate than these expected increases in our expenses or if our operating expenses are higher than we anticipate, we may not be profitable and we may incur additional losses, which could be significant. Our net losses cause us to be more highly leveraged, increase our cost of debt and make us subject to certain covenants which limit our ability to grow our business organically or through acquisitions. For more information with respect to the covenants to which we are currently subject, see the risk factor entitled “—Our indebtedness could make obtaining additional capital resources difficult and could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and our growth strategy.”

Most of our revenue is currently derived from subscribers to our online offerings and a reduction in the number of our subscribers or a reduction in the amount of spending by our subscribers could harm our financial condition.

Our internet business generated approximately 93.5% and 93% of our revenue for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and the year ended December 31, 2010, respectively, from subscribers and other paying customers to our websites. For more information regarding our revenue, see the section entitled “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations — Results of Operations.” We must continually add new subscribers to replace subscribers that we lose in the ordinary course of business due to factors such as competitive price pressures, credit card expirations, subscribers’ perceptions that they do not use our services sufficiently and general economic conditions. Our subscribers maintain their subscriptions on average for approximately six and a half months. Our business depends on our ability to attract a large number of visitors, to convert visitors into registrants, to convert registrants into members, to convert members into subscribers and to retain our subscribers. As of September 30, 2011, we had approximately 900 thousand current subscribers. For more information about our key business metrics including, but not limited to, the number of subscribers and the conversion of members to subscribers, see the section entitled “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations — Internet Segment Historical Operating Data.” If we are unable to provide the pricing and content, features, functions or services necessary to attract new subscribers or retain existing subscribers, our operating results could suffer. To the extent free social networking and personals websites, or free adult content on the internet, continue to be available or increase in availability, our ability to attract and retain subscribers may be adversely affected. In addition, any decrease in our subscribers’ spending due to general economic conditions could also reduce our revenue or negatively impact our ability to grow our revenue.

We face significant competition from other websites.

Our adult-oriented websites face competition for visitors from other websites offering free adult-oriented content. We face competition from companies offering adult-oriented internet personals websites such as Cytek Ltd., the operator of SexSearch.com and Fling Incorporated and we compete with many adult-oriented and live interactive video websites, such as Playboy.com and LiveJasmin.com. Our general audience social networking and personals websites, which contribute substantially less of our revenue and earnings, face significant competition from other social networking websites such as MySpace.com, Facebook.com and Friendster.com, as well as companies providing online personals services such as Match.com, L.L.C., Yahoo!Personals, Windows Live Profile, eHarmony, Inc., Lavalife Corp., Plentyoffish Media Inc. and Spark Networks Limited websites, including jdate.com, americansingles.com and relationships.com. Other social networking websites have higher numbers of worldwide unique users than our network of websites. According to comScore, in December 2010, Facebook.com and MySpace.com had approximately 662 million and 77 million worldwide unique visitors, respectively, compared to our websites’ 196 million worldwide unique visitors. In addition, the number of unique visitors on our general audience social networking and personals websites has decreased and may continue to decrease.

Internet-based social networking is characterized by significant competition, evolving industry standards and frequent product and service enhancements. Our competitors are constantly developing innovations in internet social networking. We must continually invest in improving our visitors’ experiences and in providing services that

people expect in a high quality internet experience, including services responsive to their needs and preferences and services that continue to attract, retain and expand our user base.

If we are unable to predict user preferences or industry changes, or if we are unable to modify our services on a timely basis, we may lose visitors, licensees, affiliates and/or advertisers. Our operating results would also suffer if our innovations are not responsive to the needs of our users, advertisers, affiliates or licensees, are not appropriately timed with market opportunity or are not effectively brought to market. As internet-based social networking technology continues to develop, our competitors may be able to offer social networking products or services that are, or that are perceived to be, substantially similar or better than those generated by us. As a result, we must continue to invest resources in order to diversify our service offerings and enhance our technology. If we are unable to provide social networking technologies and other services which generate significant traffic to our websites, our business could be harmed, causing revenue to decline.

Some of our competitors may have significantly greater financial, marketing and other resources than we do. Our competitors may undertake more far-reaching marketing campaigns, including print and television advertisements, and adopt more aggressive pricing policies that may allow them to build larger member and subscriber bases than ours. Our competitors may also develop products or services that are equal or superior to our products and services or that achieve greater market acceptance than our products and services. Our attempts to increase traffic to and revenue from our general audience websites may be unsuccessful. Additionally, some of our competitors are not subject to the same regulatory restrictions that we are, including those imposed by our December 2007 settlement with the Federal Trade Commission over the use of sexually explicit advertising. For more information regarding our potential liability for third party activities see the risk factor entitled “—We may be held secondarily liable for the actions of our affiliates, which could result in fines or other penalties that could harm our reputation, financial condition and business.” These activities could attract members and paying subscribers away from our websites, reduce our market share and adversely affect our results of operations.

We heavily rely on our affiliate network to generate traffic to our websites. If we lose affiliates, our business could experience a substantial loss of traffic, which could harm our ability to generate revenue.

Our affiliate network generated approximately 46% and 45% of our revenue for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and the year ended December 31, 2010, respectively, from visitor traffic to our websites. We generally pay referring affiliates commissions based on the amount of revenue generated by the traffic they deliver to our websites. Typically, our affiliate arrangements can be terminated immediately by us or our affiliates for any reason. Typically, we do not have exclusivity arrangements with our affiliates, and some of our affiliates may also be affiliates for our competitors. If other websites, including our competitors, were to offer higher paying affiliate programs, we could lose some of our affiliates unless we increased the commission rates we paid under our marketing affiliate program. Any increase in the commission rates we pay our affiliates would result in higher cost of revenue and could negatively impact our results of operations. Finally, we could lose affiliates if their internal policies are revised to prohibit entering into business contracts with companies like ours that provide adult material. The loss of affiliates providing significant traffic and visitors to our websites could harm our ability to generate revenue.

Increased subscriber churn or subscriber upgrade and retention costs could adversely affect our financial performance.

Turnover of subscribers in the form of subscriber service cancellations or failures to renew, or churn, has a significant financial impact on the results of operations of any subscription internet provider, including us, as does the cost of upgrading and retaining subscribers. For the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and the year ended December 31, 2010, our average monthly churn rate for our social networking websites was 16.3% and 16.1%, respectively. Any increase in the costs necessary to upgrade and retain existing subscribers could adversely affect our financial performance. In addition, such increased costs could cause us to increase our subscription rates, which could increase churn. Churn may also increase due to factors beyond our control, including churn by subscribers who are unable or unwilling to pay their monthly subscription fees because of personal financial restrictions, the impact of a slowing economy or the attractiveness of competing services or websites. If excessive numbers of subscribers cancel or fail to renew their subscriptions, we may be required to incur significantly higher marketing

expenditures than we currently anticipate in order to replace canceled or unrenewed subscribers with new subscribers, which could harm our financial condition.

We have never generated significant revenue from internet advertising and may not be able to in the future and a failure to compete effectively against other internet advertising companies could result in lost customers or could adversely affect our business and results of operations.

We have never generated significant revenue from internet advertising. In the future, we may shift some of our websites with lower subscription penetration to an advertising-based revenue model and may seek to provide selected targeted advertising on our subscriber-focused websites. Our user database serves as an existing source of potential members or subscribers for new websites we create and additionally presents opportunities for us to offer targeted online advertising to specific demographic groups.

Our ability to generate significant advertising revenue will also depend upon several factors beyond our control, including general economic conditions, changes in consumer purchasing and viewing habits and changes in the retail sales environment and the continued development of the internet as an advertising medium. If the market for internet-based advertising does not continue to develop or develops more slowly than expected, or if social networking websites are deemed to be a poor medium on which to advertise, our plan to use internet advertising revenue as a means of revenue growth may not succeed.

Because we allow our registrants to opt out of receiving certain communications from us and third parties, including advertisements, registrants who have opted out of receiving advertisements are potentially less valuable to us as a source of revenue than registrants who have not done so. The number of registrants who have opted out of receiving such communications are not identified in our gross number of registrants.

In addition, filter software programs that limit or prevent advertising from being delivered to an internet user’s computer are becoming increasingly effective and easy to use, making the success of implementing an advertising medium increasingly difficult. Widespread adoption of this type of software could harm the commercial viability of internet-based advertising and, as a result, hinder our ability to grow our advertising-based revenue.

Competition for advertising placements among current and future suppliers of internet navigational and informational services, high-traffic websites and internet service providers, or ISPs, as well as competition with non-internet media for advertising placements, could result in significant price competition, declining margins and/or reductions in advertising revenue. In addition, as we continue to expand the scope of our internet services, we may compete with a greater number of internet publishers and other media companies across an increasing range of different internet services, including in focused markets where competitors may have advantages in expertise, brand recognition and other areas. If existing or future competitors develop or offer services that provide significant performance, price, creative or other advantages over those offered by us, our business, results of operations and financial condition would be negatively affected. We would also compete with traditional advertising media, such as direct mail, television, radio, cable, and print, for a share of advertisers’ total advertising budgets. Many potential competitors would enjoy competitive advantages over us, such as longer operating histories, greater name recognition, larger customer bases, greater access to advertising space on high-traffic websites, and significantly greater financial, technical and marketing resources. As a result, we may not be able to compete successfully.

Our business depends on strong brands, and if we are not able to maintain and enhance our brands, our ability to expand our base of users, advertisers and affiliates will be impaired and our business and operating results could be harmed.

We believe that the brand recognition that we have developed has significantly contributed to the success of our business. We also believe that maintaining and enhancing the “FriendFinder” and “AdultFriendFinder” brands is critical to expanding our base of users, advertisers and affiliates. Maintaining and enhancing our brands’ profiles may require us to make substantial investments and these investments may not be successful. If we fail to promote and maintain the “FriendFinder” and “AdultFriendFinder” brands’ profiles, or if we incur excessive expenses in this effort, our business and operating results could be harmed. We anticipate that, as our market becomes increasingly competitive, maintaining and enhancing our brands’ profiles may become increasingly difficult and expensive. Maintaining and enhancing our brands will depend largely on our ability to be a technology leader and to continue to provide attractive products and services, which we may not do successfully.

People have in the past expressed, and may in the future express, concerns over certain aspects of our products. For example, people have raised privacy concerns relating to the ability of our members to post pictures, videos and other information on our websites. Aspects of our future products may raise similar public concerns. Publicity regarding such concerns could harm our brands. Further, if we fail to maintain high standards for product quality, or if we fail to maintain high ethical, social and legal standards for all of our operations and activities, our reputation could be jeopardized.

In addition, affiliates and other third parties may take actions that could impair the value of our brands. We are aware that third parties, from time to time, use “FriendFinder” and “AdultFriendFinder” and similar variations in their domain names without our approval, and our brands may be harmed if users and advertisers associate these domains with us.

Our business, financial condition and results of operations may be adversely affected by unfavorable economic and market conditions.

Changes in global economic conditions could adversely affect the profitability of our business. Economic conditions worldwide have from time to time contributed to slowdowns in the technology industry, as well as in the specific segments and markets in which we operate, resulting in reduced demand and increased price competition for our products and services. Our operating results in one or more geographic regions may also be affected by uncertain or changing economic conditions within that region, such as the challenges that are currently affecting economic conditions in the United States and abroad. If economic and market conditions in the United States or other key markets, remain unfavorable or persist, spread or deteriorate further, we may experience an adverse impact on our business, financial condition and results of operations. If our entertainment segment continues to be adversely affected by these economic conditions, we may be required to take an impairment charge with respect to these assets. In addition, the current or future tightening of credit in financial markets could result in a decrease in demand for our products and services. The demand for entertainment and leisure activities tends to be highly sensitive to consumers’ disposable incomes, and thus a decline in general economic conditions may lead to our current and potential registrants, members, subscribers and paid users having less discretionary income to spend. This could lead to a reduction in our revenue and have a material adverse effect on our operating results. For the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, the growth of our internet and entertainment revenue was adversely impacted by negative global economic conditions. For more information regarding the effect of economic conditions on our operating results see the section entitled “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.” Accordingly, the economic downturn in the United States and other countries may hurt our financial performance. We are unable to predict the likely duration and severity of the current disruption in financial markets and adverse economic conditions and the effects they may have on our business and financial condition and results of operations.

Continued imposition of tighter processing restrictions by credit card processing companies and acquiring banks would make it more difficult to generate revenue from our websites.

We rely on third parties to provide credit card processing services allowing us to accept credit card payments from our subscribers and paid users. As of September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, two credit card processing companies accounted for approximately 57.9% and 48.9% of our accounts receivable, respectively. Our business could be disrupted if these or other companies become unwilling or unable to provide these services to us. We are also subject to the operating rules, certification requirements and rules governing electronic funds transfers imposed by the payment card industry seeking to protect credit card issuers, which could change or be reinterpreted to make it difficult or impossible for us to comply with such rules or requirements. If we fail to comply, we may be subject to fines and higher transaction fees and lose our ability to accept credit card payments from our customers, and our business and operating results would be adversely affected. Our ability to accept credit cards as a form of payment for our online products and services could also be restricted or denied for a number of other reasons, including but not limited to:

•

if we experience excessive chargebacks and/or credits;

•

if we experience excessive fraud ratios;

•

if there is an adverse change in policy of the acquiring banks and/or card associations with respect to the processing of credit card charges for adult-related content;

•

if there is an increase in the number of European and U.S. banks that will not accept accounts selling adult-related content;

•

if there is a breach of our security resulting in the theft of credit card data;

•

if there is continued tightening of credit card association chargeback regulations in international commerce;

•

if there are association requirements for new technologies that consumers are less likely to use; and

•

if negative global economic conditions result in credit card companies denying more transactions.

In May 2000, American Express instituted a policy of not processing credit card transactions for online, adult-oriented content and terminated all of its adult website merchant accounts. If other credit card processing companies were to implement a similar policy, it would have a material adverse effect on our business operations and financial condition.

Our credit card chargeback rate is currently approximately 0.9% of the transactions processed and the reserves the banks require us to maintain are approximately 2.0% of our total net revenues. In addition, our required reserve balances have increased from $7.4 million at December 31, 2010 to $11.7 million at September 30, 2011 due to the addition of a new processor. If our chargeback rate increases or we are required to maintain increased reserves, this could increase our operating expenses and may have a material adverse effect on our business operations and financial condition.

Our ability to keep pace with technological developments is uncertain.

Our failure to respond in a timely and effective manner to new and evolving technologies could harm our business, financial condition and operating results. The internet industry is characterized by rapidly changing technology, evolving industry standards, changes in consumer needs and frequent new service and product introductions. Our business, financial condition and operating results will depend, in part, on our ability to develop the technical expertise to address these rapid changes and to use leading technologies effectively. We may experience difficulties that could delay or prevent the successful development, introduction or implementation of new features or services.

Further, if the new technologies on which we intend to focus our investments fail to achieve acceptance in the marketplace or our technology does not work and requires significant cost to replace or fix, our competitive position could be adversely affected, which could cause a reduction in our revenue and earnings. For example, our competitors could be the first to obtain proprietary technologies that are perceived by the market as being superior. Further, after incurring substantial costs, one or more of the technologies under development could become obsolete prior to its introduction.

To access technologies and provide products that are necessary for us to remain competitive, we may make future acquisitions and investments and may enter into strategic partnerships with other companies. Such investments may require a commitment of significant capital and human and other resources. The value of such acquisitions, investments and partnerships and the technology accessed may be highly speculative. Arrangements with third parties can lead to contractual and other disputes and dependence on the development and delivery of necessary technology on third parties that we may not be able to control or influence. These relationships may commit us to technologies that are rendered obsolete by other developments or preclude the pursuit of other technologies which may prove to be superior.

We may be held secondarily liable for the actions of our affiliates, which could result in fines or other penalties that could adversely affect our reputation, financial condition and business.

Under the terms of our December 2007 settlement with the Federal Trade Commission, we have agreed not to display sexually explicit online advertisements to consumers who are not seeking out sexually explicit content, and we require that members of our marketing affiliate network affirmatively agree to abide by this restriction as

part of our affiliate registration process. We have also agreed to end our relationship with any affiliate that fails to comply with this restriction. Notwithstanding these measures, should any affiliate fail to comply with the restriction and display sexually explicit advertisements relating to our adult-oriented websites to any consumer not seeking adult content, we may be held liable for the actions of such affiliate and subjected to fines and other penalties that could adversely affect our reputation, financial condition and business.

In addition, we run the risk of being held responsible for the conduct or legal violations of our affiliates or those who have a marketing relationship with us, including, for example, with respect to their use of adware programs or other technology that causes internet advertisements to manifest in pop ups or similar mechanisms that can be argued to block or otherwise interfere with another website’s content or otherwise be argued to violate the Lanham Act or be considered an unlawful, unfair, or deceptive business practice.

If any of our relationships with internet search websites terminate, if such websites’ methodologies are modified or if we are outbid by competitors, traffic to our websites could decline.

We depend in part on various internet search websites, such as Google.com, Bing.com, Yahoo.com and other websites to direct a significant amount of traffic to our websites. Search websites typically provide two types of search results, algorithmic and purchased listings. Algorithmic listings generally are determined and displayed as a result of a set of unpublished formulas designed by search engine companies in their discretion. Purchased listings generally are displayed if particular word searches are performed on a search engine. We rely on both algorithmic and purchased search results, as well as advertising on other internet websites, to direct a substantial share of visitors to our websites and to direct traffic to the advertiser customers we serve. If these internet search websites modify or terminate their relationship with us or we are outbid by our competitors for purchased listings, meaning that our competitors pay a higher price to be listed above us in a list of search results, traffic to our websites could decline. Such a decline in traffic could affect our ability to generate subscription revenue and could reduce the desirability of advertising on our websites.

If members decrease their contributions of content to our websites that depend on such content, the viability of those websites would be impaired.

Many of our websites rely on members’ continued contribution of content without compensation. We cannot guarantee that members will continue to contribute such content to our websites. In addition, we may offer discounts to members who provide content for our websites as an incentive for their contributions. In the event that contributing members decrease their contributions to our websites, or if the quality of such contributions is not sufficiently attractive to our audiences, or if we are required to offer additional discounts in order to encourage members to contribute content to our websites, this could have a negative impact on our business, revenue and financial condition.

Our business, financial condition and results of operations could be adversely affected if we fail to provide adequate security to protect our users and our systems.

Online security breaches could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. Any well-publicized compromise of security could deter use of the internet in general or use of the internet to conduct transactions that involve transmitting confidential information or downloading sensitive materials. In offering online payment services, we may increasingly rely on technology licensed from third parties to provide the security and authentication necessary to effect secure transmission of confidential information, such as customer credit card numbers. Advances in computer capabilities, new discoveries in the field of cryptography or other developments could compromise or breach the algorithms that we use to protect our customers’ transaction data. If third parties are able to penetrate our network security or otherwise misappropriate confidential information, we could be subject to liability, which could result in litigation. In addition, experienced programmers or “hackers” may attempt to misappropriate proprietary information or cause interruptions in our services that could require us to expend significant capital and resources to protect against or remediate these problems.

Our business involves risks of liability claims arising from our media content, which could adversely affect our ability to generate revenue and could increase our operating expenses.

As a distributor of media content, we face potential liability for defamation, invasion of privacy, negligence, copyright or trademark infringement, obscenity, violation of rights of publicity and/or obscenity laws and other claims based on the nature and content of the materials distributed. These types of claims have been brought, sometimes successfully, against broadcasters, publishers, online services and other disseminators of media content. We could also be exposed to liability in connection with content made available through our online social networking and personals websites by users of those websites. Any imposition of liability that is not covered by insurance or is in excess of our insurance coverage could have a material adverse effect on us. In addition, measures to reduce our exposure to liability in connection with content available through our internet websites could require us to take steps that would substantially limit the attractiveness of our internet websites and/or their availability in certain geographic areas, which could adversely affect our ability to generate revenue and could increase our operating expenses.

Privacy concerns could increase our costs, damage our reputation, deter current and potential users from using our products and services and negatively affect our operating results.

From time to time, concerns may arise about whether our products and services compromise the privacy of users and others. Concerns about our practices with regard to the collection, use, disclosure or security of personal information or other privacy-related matters, even if unfounded, could damage our reputation and deter current and potential users from using our products and services, which could negatively affect our operating results. While we strive to comply with all applicable data protection laws and regulations, as well as our own posted privacy policies, any failure or perceived failure to comply may result in proceedings or actions against us by governmental entities or others, which could potentially have an adverse effect on our business. Increased scrutiny by regulatory agencies, such as the Federal Trade Commission and state agencies, of the use of customer information, could also result in additional expenses if we are obligated to reengineer systems to comply with new regulations or to defend investigations of our privacy practices.

In addition, as most of our products and services are web based, the amount of data we store for our users on our servers (including personal information) has been increasing. Any systems failure or compromise of our security that results in the release of our users’ data could seriously harm our reputation and brand and, therefore, our business. A security or privacy breach may:

•

cause our customers to lose confidence in our services;

•

deter consumers from using our services;

•

harm our reputation;

•

require that we expend significant additional resources related to our information security systems and result in a disruption of our operations;

•

expose us to liability;

•

subject us to unfavorable regulatory restrictions and requirements imposed by the Federal Trade Commission or similar authority;

•

cause us to incur expenses related to remediation costs; and

•

decrease market acceptance of the use of e-commerce transactions.

The risk that these types of events could adversely affect our business is likely to increase as we expand the number of products and services we offer as well as increase the number of countries where we operate, as more opportunities for such breaches of privacy will exist.

Proposed legislation concerning data protection is currently pending at the U.S. federal and state level as well as in certain foreign jurisdictions. In addition, the interpretation and application of data protection laws in Europe, the United States and elsewhere are still uncertain and in flux. It is possible that these laws may be interpreted and

applied in a manner that is inconsistent with our data practices. If so, in addition to the possibility of fines, this could result in an order requiring that we change our data practices, which could have an adverse effect on our business. Complying with these laws as they evolve could cause us to incur substantial costs or require us to change our business practices in a manner adverse to our business.

We may not be able to protect and enforce our intellectual property rights.

We currently own and maintain approximately 100 U.S. trademark registrations and applications and over 950 foreign trademark registrations and applications. We believe that our trademarks, particularly the “AdultFriendFinder,” “FriendFinder,” “FastCupid,” “Penthouse,” “Penthouse Letters,” “Forum,” and “Variations” names and marks, the One Key Logo, and other proprietary rights are important to our success, potential growth and competitive position. Our inability or failure to protect or enforce these trademarks and other proprietary rights could have a material adverse effect on our business. Accordingly, we devote substantial resources to the establishment, protection and enforcement of our trademarks and other proprietary rights. Our actions to establish, protect and enforce our trademarks and other proprietary rights may not prevent imitation of our products, services or brands or control piracy by others or prevent others from claiming violations of their trademarks and other proprietary rights by us or prevent others from challenging the validity of our trademarks. In addition, the enforcement of our intellectual property rights, including trademark rights, through legal or administrative proceedings would be costly and time-consuming and would likely divert management from their normal responsibilities. An adverse determination in any litigation or other proceeding could put one or more of our intellectual property rights at risk of being invalidated or interpreted narrowly. On April 13, 2011, Facebook, Inc., or Facebook, filed a complaint against us and certain of our subsidiaries in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, alleging trademark infringement. The parties are currently engaged in discovery and the court has ordered the parties to attend mediation by January 2012. For a description of this complaint, please see “Legal Proceedings” below. There are factors outside of our control that pose a threat to our intellectual property rights. For example, effective intellectual property protection may not be available in every country in which our products and services are distributed or made available through the internet.

Intellectual property litigation could expose us to significant costs and liabilities and thus negatively affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

We are, from time to time, subject to claims of infringement of third party patents and trademarks and other violations of third party intellectual property rights. For example, on April 13, 2011, Facebook filed a complaint against us and certain of our subsidiaries alleging trademark infringement. For a description of this complaint, please see “Legal Proceedings” below. Intellectual property disputes are generally time-consuming and expensive to litigate or settle, and the outcome of such disputes is uncertain and difficult to predict. The existence of such disputes may require the set-aside of substantial reserves, and has the potential to significantly affect our overall financial standing. To the extent that claims against us are successful, they may subject us to substantial liability, and we may have to pay substantial monetary damages, change aspects of our business model, and/or discontinue any of our services or practices that are found to be in violation of another party’s rights. Such outcomes may severely restrict or hinder ongoing business operations and impact the value of our business. Successful claims against us could also result in us having to seek a license to continue our practices. Under such conditions, a license may or may not be offered or otherwise made available to us. If a license is made available to us, the cost of the license may significantly increase our operating burden and expenses, potentially resulting in a negative effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Although we have been and are currently involved in multiple areas of commerce, internet services, and high technology where there is a substantial risk of future patent litigation, we have not obtained insurance for patent infringement losses. If we are unsuccessful at resolving pending and future patent litigation in a reasonable and affordable manner, it could disrupt our business and operations, including by negatively impacting areas of commerce or putting us at a competitive disadvantage.

If we are unable to protect the confidentiality of certain information, the value of our products and technology could be materially adversely affected.

Our commercial success depends on our know-how, trade secrets and other intellectual property, including the ability to protect our intellectual property. We rely upon unpatented proprietary technology, processes, know-how and data that we regard as trade secrets, including our proprietary source code for our software systems. We seek to protect our proprietary information in part through confidentiality agreements with employees and others. These agreements may be breached, and we may not have adequate remedies for any such breach. In addition, our trade secrets may otherwise become known or be independently developed by competitors in a manner providing us with no practical recourse against the competing parties. If any such events were to occur, there could be a material adverse effect on our business, financial position, results of operations and future growth prospects.

If we are unable to obtain or maintain key website addresses, our ability to operate and grow our business may be impaired.

Our website addresses, or domain names, are critical to our business. We currently own more than 3,200 domain names. However, the regulation of domain names is subject to change, and it may be difficult for us to prevent third parties from acquiring domain names that are similar to ours, that infringe our trademarks or that otherwise decrease the value of our brands. If we are unable to obtain or maintain key domain names for the various areas of our business, our ability to operate and grow our business may be impaired.

We may have difficulty scaling and adapting our existing network infrastructure to accommodate increased traffic and technology advances or changing business requirements, which could cause us to incur significant expenses and lead to the loss of users and advertisers.

To be successful, our network infrastructure has to perform well and be reliable. The greater the user traffic and the greater the complexity of our products and services, the more computer power we will need. We could incur substantial costs if we need to modify our websites or our infrastructure to adapt to technological changes. If we do not maintain our network infrastructure successfully, or if we experience inefficiencies and operational failures, the quality of our products and services and our users’ experience could decline. Maintaining an efficient and technologically advanced network infrastructure is particularly critical to our business because of the pictorial nature of the products and services provided on our websites. A decline in quality could damage our reputation and lead us to lose current and potential users and advertisers. Cost increases, loss of traffic or failure to accommodate new technologies or changing business requirements could harm our operating results and financial condition.

The loss of our main data center, our backup data center or other parts of our systems and network infrastructure would adversely affect our business.

Our main data center, our backup data center and most of our servers are located at external third-party facilities in Northern California, an area with a high risk of major earthquakes. If our main data center or other parts of our systems and network infrastructure was destroyed by, or suffered significant damage from, an earthquake, fire, flood, lightning, tornado, or other similar catastrophes, or if our main data center was closed because of the operator having financial difficulties, our business would be adversely affected. Our casualty insurance policies may not adequately compensate us for any losses that may occur due to the occurrence of a natural disaster.

Our internet operations are subject to system failures and interruptions that could hurt our ability to provide users with access to our websites, which could adversely affect our business and results of operations.

The uninterrupted performance of our computer systems is critical to the operation of our websites. Our ability to provide access to our websites and content may be disrupted by power losses, telecommunications failures or break-ins to the facilities housing our servers. Our users may become dissatisfied by any disruption or failure of our computer systems that interrupts our ability to provide our content. Repeated or prolonged system failures could substantially reduce the attractiveness of our websites and/or interfere with commercial transactions, negatively affecting our ability to generate revenue. Our websites must accommodate a high volume of traffic and deliver

regularly-updated content. Some of our network infrastructure is not fully redundant, meaning that we do not have back-up infrastructure on site for our entire network, and our disaster recovery planning cannot account for all eventualities. Our websites have, on occasion, experienced slow response times and network failures. These types of occurrences in the future could cause users to perceive our websites as not functioning properly and therefore induce them to frequent other websites. We are also subject to risks from failures in computer systems other than our own because our users depend on their own internet service providers in order to access our websites and view our content. Our revenue could be negatively affected by outages or other difficulties users experience in accessing our websites due to internet service providers’ system disruptions or similar failures unrelated to our systems. Any disruption in the ability of users to access our websites could result in fewer visitors to our websites and subscriber cancellations or failures to renew, which could adversely affect our business and results of operations. We may not carry sufficient levels of business interruption insurance to compensate us for losses that may occur as a result of any events that cause interruptions in our service.

Because of our adult content, companies providing products and services on which we rely may refuse to do business with us.

Many companies that provide products and services we need are concerned that associating with us could lead to their becoming the target of negative publicity campaigns by public interest groups and boycotts of their products and services. As a result of these concerns, these companies may be reluctant to enter into or continue business relationships with us. For example, some domestic banks have declined providing merchant bank processing services to us and some credit card companies have ceased or declined to be affiliated with us. This has caused us, in some cases, to seek out and establish business relationships with international providers of the services we need to operate our business. There can be no assurance however, that we will be able to maintain our existing business relationships with the companies, domestic or international, that currently provide us with services and products. Our inability to maintain such business relationships, or to find replacement service providers, would materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. We could be forced to enter into business arrangements on terms less favorable to us than we might otherwise obtain, which could lead to our doing business with less competitive terms, higher transaction costs and more inefficient operations than if we were able to maintain such business relationships or find replacement service providers.

Changes in laws could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Our businesses are regulated by diverse and evolving laws and governmental authorities in the United States and other countries in which we operate. Such laws relate to, among other things, internet, licensing, copyrights, commercial advertising, subscription rates, foreign investment, use of confidential customer information and content, including standards of decency/obscenity and record-keeping for adult content production. Promulgation of new laws, changes in current laws, changes in interpretations by courts and other government officials of existing laws, our inability or failure to comply with current or future laws or strict enforcement by current or future government officers of current or future laws could adversely affect us by reducing our revenue, increasing our operating expenses and/or exposing us to significant liabilities. The following laws relating to the internet, commercial advertising and adult content highlight some of the potential difficulties we face:

•

Internet. Several U.S. governmental agencies are considering a number of legislative and regulatory proposals that may lead to laws or regulations concerning different aspects of the internet, including social networking, online content, intellectual property rights, e-mail, user privacy, taxation, access charges, liability for third-party activities and personal jurisdiction. New Jersey enacted the Internet Dating Safety Act in 2008, which requires online dating services to disclose whether they perform criminal background screening practices and to offer safer dating tips on their websites. Other states have enacted or considered enacting similar legislation. While online dating and social networking websites are not currently required to verify the age or identity of their members or to run criminal background checks on them, any such requirements could increase our cost of operations or discourage use of our services. The Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act (COPPA) restricts the ability of online services to collect information from minors. The Protection of Children from Sexual Predators Act of 1998 requires online service providers to report evidence of violations of federal child pornography laws under certain circumstances.

In the area of data protection, many states have passed laws requiring notification to users when there is a security breach for personal data, such as California’s Information Practices Act. Congress, the FTC and at least thirty-seven states have promulgated laws and regulations regarding email advertising and the application of such laws and the extent of federal preemptions is still evolving. Under U.S. law, the Digital Millennium Copyright Act has provisions which limit, but do not eliminate, our liability to list or link to third-party websites that include materials that infringe copyrights, so long as we comply with the statutory requirements of this act. Furthermore, the Communications Decency Act (CDA), under certain circumstances, immunizes computer service providers from liability for certain non-intellectual property claims for content created by third parties. The interpretation of the extent of CDA immunity is evolving and we run the risk that in certain instances we may not qualify for such immunity. We face similar risks in international markets where our products and services are offered and may be subject to additional regulations and balkanized laws. The interpretation and application of data protection laws in the United States, Europe and elsewhere are still uncertain and in flux. It is possible that these laws may be interpreted and applied in a manner that is inconsistent with our data practices. If so, in addition to the possibility of fines and other monetary remedies, this could result in an order requiring that we change our data practices. In 2008, Nevada enacted a law prohibiting businesses from transferring a customer’s personal information through an electronic transmission, unless that information is encrypted. In practice, the law requires businesses operating in Nevada to purchase and implement data encryption software in order to send any electronic transmission (including e-mail) that contains a customer’s personal information.

More recently, Massachusetts has adopted regulations, which, like the Nevada law, require businesses to encrypt data sent over the internet. However, these Massachusetts regulations also require encryption of data on laptops and flash drives or other portable devices, and apply to anyone who owns, licenses, stores, or maintains personal information about the state’s residents. Any failure on our part to comply with these regulations may subject us to additional liabilities.

Regulation of the internet could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations by reducing the overall use of the internet, reducing the demand for our services or increasing our cost of doing business. Proposed legislation concerning data protection is currently pending at the U.S. federal and state level as well as in certain foreign jurisdictions. Complying with these laws could cause us to incur substantial costs or require us to change our business practices in a manner adverse to our business.

•

Commercial advertising. We receive a significant portion of our print publications advertising revenue from companies that sell tobacco products. Significant limitations on the ability of those companies to advertise in our publications or on our websites because of legislative, regulatory or court action could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

•

Adult content. Regulation, investigations and prosecutions of adult content could prevent us from making such content available in certain jurisdictions or otherwise have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. Government officials may also place additional restrictions on adult content affecting the way people interact on the internet. The governments of some countries, such as China and India, have sought to limit the influence of other cultures by restricting the distribution of products deemed to represent foreign or “immoral” influences. Regulation aimed at limiting minors’ access to adult content both in the United States and abroad could also increase our cost of operations and introduce technological challenges by requiring development and implementation of age verification systems. U.S. government officials could amend or construe and seek to enforce more broadly or aggressively the adult content recordkeeping and labeling requirements set forth in 18 U.S.C. Section 2257 and its implementing regulations in a manner that is unfavorable to our business. Court rulings may place additional restrictions on adult content affecting how people interact on the internet, such as mandatory web labeling.

We could be held liable for any physical and emotional harm caused by our members and subscribers to other members or subscribers.

We cannot control the actions of our members and subscribers in their online behavior or their communication or physical actions with other members or subscribers. There is a possibility that one or more of our members or

subscribers could be physically or emotionally harmed by the behavior of or following interaction with another of our members or subscribers. We warn our members and subscribers that member profiles are provided solely by third parties, and we are not responsible for the accuracy of information they contain or the intentions of individuals that use our sites. We are also unable to and do not take any action to ensure personal safety on a meeting between members or subscribers arranged following contact initiated via our websites. If an unfortunate incident of this nature occurred in a meeting between users of our websites following contact initiated on one of our websites or a website of one of our competitors, any resulting negative publicity could materially and adversely affect us or the social networking and online personals industry in general. Any such incident involving one of our websites could damage our reputation and our brands. This, in turn, could adversely affect our revenue and could cause the value of our common stock to decline. In addition, the affected members or subscribers could initiate legal action against us, which could cause us to incur significant expense, whether or not we were ultimately successful in defending such action, and damage our reputation.

Our websites may be misused by users, despite the safeguards we have in place to protect against such behavior.

Users may be able to circumvent the controls we have in place to prevent illegal or dishonest activities and behavior on our websites, and may engage in such activities and behavior despite these controls. For example, our websites could be used to exploit children and to facilitate individuals seeking payment for sexual activity and related activities in jurisdictions in which such behavior is illegal. The behavior of such users could injure our other members and may jeopardize the reputation of our websites and the integrity of our brands. Users could also post fraudulent profiles or create false or unauthorized profiles on behalf of other, non-consenting parties. This behavior could expose us to liability or lead to negative publicity that could injure the reputation of our websites and of social networking and online personals websites in general.

Our business is exposed to risks associated with online commerce security and credit card fraud.

Consumer concerns over the security of transactions conducted on the internet or the privacy of users may inhibit the growth of the internet and online commerce. To transmit confidential information such as customer credit card numbers securely, we rely on encryption and authentication technology. Unanticipated events or developments could result in a compromise or breach of the systems we use to protect customer transaction data. Furthermore, our servers may also be vulnerable to viruses and other attacks transmitted via the internet. While we proactively check for intrusions into our infrastructure, a new and undetected virus could cause a service disruption. Under current credit card practices, we may be held liable for fraudulent credit card transactions and other payment disputes with customers. A failure to control fraudulent credit card transactions adequately would adversely affect our business.

If one or more states or countries successfully assert that we should collect sales or other taxes on the use of the internet or the online sales of goods and services, our expenses could increase, resulting in lower margins.

In the United States, federal and state tax authorities are currently exploring the appropriate tax treatment of companies engaged in e-commerce and new state tax regulations may subject us to additional state sales and income taxes, which could increase our expenses and decrease our profit margins. The application of indirect taxes (such as sales and use tax, value added tax, goods and services tax, business tax and gross receipt tax) to e-commerce businesses such as ours and to our users is a complex and evolving issue. Many of the statutes and regulations that impose these taxes were established before the growth in internet technology and e-commerce. In many cases, it is not clear how existing statutes apply to the internet or e-commerce or communications conducted over the internet. In addition, some jurisdictions have implemented or may implement laws specifically addressing the internet or some aspect of e-commerce or communications on the internet. The application of existing or future laws could have adverse effects on our business.

Under current law, as outlined in the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in Quill Corp. v. North Dakota, 504 U.S. 298 (1992), a seller with substantial nexus (usually defined as physical presence) in its customer’s state is required to collect state (and local) sales tax on sales arranged over the internet (or by telephone, mail order, or other means). In contrast, an out-of-state seller without substantial nexus in the customer’s state is not required to collect the sales tax. The U.S. federal government’s moratorium on states and other local authorities imposing new taxes on internet

access or multiple or discriminatory taxes on internet commerce is scheduled to expire in October 31, 2014. This moratorium, however, does not prohibit the possibility that U.S. Congress will be willing to grant state or local authorities the authority to require remote (out-of-state) sellers to collect sales and use taxes on interstate sales of goods (including intellectual property) and services over the internet. Several proposals to that extent have been made at the U.S. federal, state and local levels (for example, the Streamlined Sales and the Use Tax initiative). These proposals, if adopted, would likely result in our having to charge state sales tax to some or all of our users in connection with the sale of our products and services, which would harm our business if the added cost deterred users from visiting our websites and could substantially impair the growth of our e-commerce opportunities and diminish our ability to derive financial benefit from our activities.

Certain states, including New York, Illinois, Connecticut, Colorado, North Carolina, Rhode Island and Tennessee, have adopted, or are in the process of adopting, state nexus laws, often referred to as Amazon tax laws, whereby the responsibility to collect sales or use taxes is imposed on an out-of-state- seller which used an in-state resident to solicit business from the residents of that state using internet sites. If it is determined that these laws are applicable to our operations, then we could be required to collect from our customers and remit additional sales or use taxes and, if any state determines that we should have been collecting such taxes previously, we may be subject to past tax, interest, late fees and penalties.

In addition, in 2007 we received a claim from the State of Texas for an immaterial amount relating to our failure to file franchise tax returns for the years 2000 through 2006. We believe that we are not obligated to file franchise tax returns because of the nature of our services provided and the lack of sufficient nexus to the State of Texas. On appeal the State of Texas reversed their earlier position and found in our favor. We have received and could continue to receive similar inquiries from other states attempting to impose franchise, income or similar taxes on us.

We collect and remit VAT on digital orders from purchasers in most member states of the European Union. There can be no assurance that this increased cost will not adversely affect our ability to attract new subscribers within the European Union or to retain existing subscribers within the European Union and consequently adversely affect our results of operations. Certain member states, including the United Kingdom, have ruled that we are not required to register and account for VAT in their jurisdiction. There can be no assurance that the tax authorities of these jurisdictions will not, at some point in the future, revise their current position and require us to register and account for VAT.

Our liability to tax authorities in the European Union for the failure of Various and its subsidiaries to collect and remit VAT on purchases made by subscribers in the European Union could adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.

After our acquisition of Various in December 2007, we became aware that Various and its subsidiaries had not collected VAT from subscribers in the European Union nor had Various remitted VAT to the tax jurisdictions requiring it. We have initiated discussions with most tax authorities in the European Union jurisdictions to attempt to resolve liabilities related to Various’ past failure to collect and remit VAT, and while we have resolved such prior liabilities in several jurisdictions on favorable terms, there can be no assurance that we will resolve or reach a favorable resolution in every jurisdiction. If we are unable to reach a favorable resolution with a jurisdiction, the terms of such resolution could adversely affect our financial condition or results of operations. For example, we might be required to pay substantial sums of money without the benefit of a payment deferral plan, which could adversely affect our cash position and impair operations. As of September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the total amount of historical uncollected VAT payments was approximately $40.3 million and $39.4 million, respectively, including approximately $21.2 million and $19.5 million, respectively, in potential penalties and interest. For more information regarding the potential effect that our VAT liability could have on our operations see the section entitled “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations — Liquidity and Capital Resources.”

Until we have reached a favorable resolution with a jurisdiction, the jurisdictions might take action against us and against our managers. For example, in an effort to recover VAT payments it claims it is owed, the German tax authority has attempted unsuccessfully to freeze assets in bank accounts maintained by subsidiaries of Various in Germany, and did freeze €610,343 of assets in a bank account in The Netherlands with the cooperation of the Dutch authorities and continues to enlist the Dutch tax authorities to assist in its collection efforts. If another jurisdiction were to freeze or seize our cash or other assets, our operations and financial condition could be impaired. In addition,

in many jurisdictions the potential exists for criminal investigations or proceedings to be instituted against us and against individual members of prior or current management. Were members of our management to face criminal processes individually, their attention to operational matters could be diverted and their ability to continue to serve in their capacities could be impaired. Were Various or its subsidiaries to face criminal processes, it could result in additional fines and penalties, or substantially interfere with continued operations in such jurisdictions. We are actively engaged in efforts to resolve all issues, but there can be no assurance that we will be able to do so.

Unforeseen liabilities arising from our acquisition of Various could materially adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.

Our acquisition of Various and its subsidiaries in December 2007 may expose us to undisclosed and unforeseen operating risks and liabilities arising from Various’s operating history. For example, after our acquisition of Various we became aware that VAT had not been collected from subscribers in the European Union and that VAT had not been paid to tax authorities in the European Union. There can be no assurance that other unforeseen liabilities related to the acquisition of Various and its subsidiaries (including, without limitation, VAT issues in other non-European Union jurisdictions) could materialize.

Our recourse for liabilities arising from our acquisition of Various is limited.

Under the agreement pursuant to which we purchased Various and its subsidiaries in December 2007, our sole recourse against the sellers for most losses suffered by us as a result of liabilities was to offset the principal amount of our Subordinated Convertible Notes by the amount of any such losses. The maximum amount of such offset available to us was $175 million. On October 8, 2009, we settled and released all indemnity claims against the sellers (whether the claims were VAT related or not) by reducing the original principal amount of the Subordinated Convertible Notes to $156 million from $170 million. In addition, the sellers agreed to make available to us, to pay VAT and certain VAT-related expenses, $10.0 million cash held in a working capital escrow account established at the closing of the Various transaction. If the actual costs to us of eliminating the VAT liability are less than $29.0 million, after applying amounts from the working capital escrow, then the principal amount of the Old Non-Cash Pay Notes (notes issued in exchange for the Subordinated Convertible Notes in the New Financing) will be increased by the issuance of Non-Cash Pay Notes to reflect the difference between $29.0 million and the actual VAT liability, plus interest on such difference. Accordingly, any additional undisclosed liabilities arising from our acquisition of Various may result in losses that we can no longer attempt to recover from the sellers. Any such liabilities for which we have no recourse could adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.

In pursuing future acquisitions we may not be successful in identifying appropriate acquisition candidates or consummating acquisitions on favorable or acceptable terms. Furthermore, we may face significant integration issues and may not realize the anticipated benefits of the acquisitions due to integration difficulties or other operating issues.

If appropriate opportunities become available, we may acquire businesses, products or technologies that we believe are strategically advantageous to our business. Transactions of this sort could involve numerous risks, including:

•

unforeseen operating difficulties and expenditures arising from the process of integrating any acquired business, product or technology, including related personnel, and maintaining uniform standards, controls, procedures and policies;

•

diversion of a significant amount of management’s attention from the ongoing development of our business;

•

dilution of existing stockholders’ ownership interests;

•

incurrence of additional debt;

•

exposure to additional operational risks and liabilities, including risks and liabilities arising from the operating history of any acquired businesses;

•

negative effects on reported results of operations from acquisition-related charges and amortization of acquired intangibles;

•

entry into markets and geographic areas where we have limited or no experience;

•

the potential inability to retain and motivate key employees of acquired businesses;

•

adverse effects on our relationships with suppliers and customers; and

•

adverse effects on the existing relationships of any acquired companies, including suppliers and customers.

In addition, we may not be successful in identifying appropriate acquisition candidates or consummating acquisitions on favorable or acceptable terms, or at all. Failure to effectively manage our growth through acquisitions could adversely affect our growth prospects, business, results of operations and financial condition.

Our efforts to capitalize upon opportunities to expand into new markets may fail and could result in a loss of capital and other valuable resources.

One of our strategies is to expand into new markets to increase our revenue base. We intend to identify new markets by targeting identifiable groups of people who share common interests and the desire to meet other individuals with similar interests, backgrounds or traits. Our planned expansion into new markets will occupy our management’s time and attention and will require us to invest significant capital resources. The results of our expansion efforts into new markets are unpredictable and there is no guarantee that our efforts will have a positive effect on our revenue base. We face many risks associated with our planned expansion into new markets, including but not limited to the following:

•

competition from pre-existing competitors with significantly stronger brand recognition in the markets we enter;

•

our erroneous evaluations of the potential of such markets;

•

diversion of capital and other valuable resources away from our core business;

•

foregoing opportunities that are potentially more profitable; and

•

weakening our current brands by over expansion into too many new markets.

We face the risk that additional international expansion efforts and operations will not be effective.

One of our strategies is to increase our revenue base by expanding into new international markets and expanding our presence in existing international markets. Further expansion into international markets requires management time and capital resources. We face the following risks associated with our expansion outside the United States:

•

challenges caused by distance, language and cultural differences;

•

local competitors with substantially greater brand recognition, more users and more traffic than we have;

•

challenges associated with creating and increasing our brand recognition, improving our marketing efforts internationally and building strong relationships with local affiliates;

•

longer payment cycles in some countries;

•

credit risk and higher levels of payment fraud in some countries;

•

different legal and regulatory restrictions among jurisdictions;

•

political, social and economic instability;

•

potentially adverse tax consequences; and

•

higher costs associated with doing business internationally.

Our business will suffer if we lose and are unable to replace key personnel, in the event that we fail or choose not to pay severance to Messrs. Bell and Staton and they choose to compete against us or solicit our employees or if the other obligations of our key personnel create conflicts of interest or otherwise distract these individuals.

We believe that our ability to successfully implement our business strategy and to operate profitably depends on the continued employment of our executive officers and other key employees. In particular, Marc Bell and Daniel Staton are critical to our overall management and our strategic direction. We have entered into employment

agreements with each of Messrs. Bell and Staton which sets a term of employment and provides for certain bonuses and grants of our stock in order to incentivize performance. However, the executives are free to voluntarily terminate their employment upon 180 days’ prior written notice. Therefore, the agreements do not ensure continued service with us. In the event we do not pay severance to Messrs. Bell and Staton, including under circumstances pursuant to which either of Messrs. Bell or Staton are terminated by us for cause (as defined in their employment agreement) or terminate their employment for good reason (as defined in their employment agreement) and our board of directors fails or chooses not to pay severance to them, Messrs. Bell and Staton will not be subject to a non-compete or a non-solicitation agreement. If that occurs, Messrs. Bell and Staton could immediately compete against us and solicit our employees to work for them. We have not obtained key-man life insurance and there is no guarantee that we will be able to obtain such insurance in the future. Furthermore, most of our key employees are at-will employees. If we lose members of our senior management without retaining replacements, or in the event that we do not pay severance to Messrs. Bell and Staton and they choose to compete against us or solicit our employees to work for them, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be materially adversely affected.

Additionally, Mr. Staton serves as Chairman and Mr. Bell serves as a director of ARMOUR Residential REIT, Inc., or ARMOUR. Staton Bell Blank Check LLC, an entity affiliated with Messrs. Bell and Staton, is contractually obligated to provide services to ARMOUR Residential Management LLC, or ARRM, which entity will manage and advise ARMOUR, pursuant to a sub-management agreement. Staton Bell Blank Check LLC will be receiving a percentage of the net management fees earned by ARRM. Each of Messrs. Bell and Staton is permitted to devote up to twenty percent of his business time to other business activities. We expect that Messrs. Bell and Staton, will devote approximately ten percent of their combined time to ARMOUR. Messrs. Bell and Staton’s service as a director or an affiliate of the sub-manager of ARMOUR could cause them to be distracted from the management of our business and could also create conflicts of interest if they are faced with decisions that could have materially different implications for us and for ARMOUR, such as in the area of potential acquisitions. If such a conflict arises, we believe our directors and officers intend to take all actions necessary to comply with their fiduciary duties to our stockholders, including, where appropriate, abstaining from voting on matters that present a conflict of interest. However, these conflicts of interest, or the perception among investors that conflicts of interest could arise, could harm our business and cause our stock price to fall.

We rely on highly skilled personnel and, if we are unable to attract, retain or motivate key personnel or hire qualified personnel, we may not be able to grow effectively.

Our growth strategy and performance is largely dependent on the talents and efforts of highly skilled individuals. Our success greatly depends on our ability to attract, hire, train, retain and motivate qualified personnel, particularly in sales, marketing, service and support. There can be no assurance that we will be able to successfully recruit and integrate new employees. We face significant competition for individuals with the skills required to perform the services we offer and currently we do not have non-compete agreements with a number of our executive officers or key personnel. In addition, in the event we do not pay severance to Messrs. Bell and Staton, including under circumstances pursuant to which either of Messrs. Bell or Staton are terminated by us for cause (as defined in their employment agreement) or terminate their employment for good reason (as defined in their employment agreement) and our board of directors fails or chooses not to pay severance to them, Messrs. Bell and Staton will not be subject to a non-compete or a non-solicitation agreement. If that occurs, Messrs. Bell and Staton could immediately compete against us and solicit our employees to work for them. The loss of the services of our executive officers or other key personnel, particularly if lost to competitors, could materially and adversely affect our business. If we are unable to attract, integrate and retain qualified personnel or if we experience high personnel turnover, we could be prevented from effectively managing and expanding our business.

Moreover, companies in technology industries whose employees accept positions with competitors have in the past claimed that their competitors have engaged in unfair competition or hiring practices. If we received such claims in the future as we seek to hire qualified personnel, it could lead to material litigation. We could incur substantial costs in defending against such claims, regardless of their merit. Competition in our industry for qualified employees is intense, and certain of our competitors may directly target our employees. Our continued ability to compete effectively depends on our ability to attract new employees and to retain and motivate our existing employees.

Workplace and other restrictions on access to the internet may limit user traffic on our websites.

Many offices, businesses, libraries and educational institutions restrict employee and student access to the internet or to certain types of websites, including social networking and personals websites. Since our revenue is dependent on user traffic to our websites, an increase in these types of restrictions, or other similar policies, could harm our business, financial condition and operating results. In addition, access to our websites outside the United States may be restricted by governmental authorities or internet service providers. These restrictions could hinder our growth.

Adverse currency fluctuations could decrease revenue and increase expenses.

We conduct business globally in many foreign currencies, but report our financial results in U.S. dollars. We are therefore exposed to adverse movements in foreign currency exchange rates because depreciation of non-U.S. currencies against the U.S. dollar reduces the U.S. dollar value of the non-U.S. dollar denominated revenue that we recognize and appreciation of non-U.S. currencies against the U.S. dollar increases the U.S. dollar value of expenses that we incur that are denominated in those foreign currencies. Such fluctuations could decrease revenue and increase our expenses. We have not entered into foreign currency hedging contracts to reduce the effect of adverse changes in the value of foreign currencies but may do so in the future.

We are subject to litigation and adverse outcomes in such litigation could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition.

We are party to various litigation claims and legal proceedings including, but not limited to, actions relating to intellectual property, in particular patent infringement claims against us, breach of contract and fraud claims, some of which are described in this prospectus in the section entitled “Legal Proceedings” and the notes to our audited consolidated financial statements, that involve claims for substantial amounts of money or for other relief or that might necessitate changes to our business or operations. The defense of these actions may be both time consuming and expensive.

We evaluate these litigation claims and legal proceedings to assess the likelihood of unfavorable outcomes and to estimate, if possible, the amount of potential losses. Based on these assessments and estimates, we establish reserves and/or disclose the relevant litigation claims or legal proceedings, as appropriate. These assessments and estimates are based on the information available to management at the time and involve a significant amount of management judgment. As a result, actual outcomes or losses may differ materially from those envisioned by our current assessments and estimates. Our failure to successfully defend or settle any of these litigations or legal proceedings could result in liability that, to the extent not covered by our insurance, could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, revenue and profitability and could cause the market value of our common stock to decline.

Industry reports may not accurately reflect the current economic climate.

Because industry reports and publications contain data that has been compiled for prior measurement periods, such reports and publications may not accurately reflect the current economic climate affecting the industry. The necessary lag time between the end of a measured period and the release of an industry report or publication may result in reporting results that, while not inaccurate with respect to the period reported, are out of date with the current state of the industry.

USE OF PROCEEDS

The selling securityholders will receive all of the proceeds from the sale of the Registrable Notes and Registrable Shares offered by this prospectus. We are not selling any securities under this prospectus and we will not receive any proceeds from the sale of Registrable Notes or Registrable Shares by the selling securityholders. No consideration will be paid in connection with the conversion of the Non-Cash Pay Notes to Note Shares.

DILUTION

Pursuant to this offering, we are registering the resale of the Registrable Notes and Registrable Shares to permit the resale of these securities by the selling securityholders on a continuous or delayed basis in the future. Sales of Registrable Shares by the selling securityholders will not result in a change to the net tangible book value deficiency per share before and after the distribution of shares by the selling securityholders. However, purchasers of Registrable Shares from the selling securityholders will experience dilution to the extent of the excess of the amount per share paid over the net tangible book value deficiency per share of our common stock at the time of the purchase. Net tangible book value deficiency per share represents the amount that the total liabilities exceeds total tangible assets divided by the number of outstanding shares of our common stock.

SELLING SECURITYHOLDERS

The selling securityholders, including their transferees, pledgees, donees or their successors, may from time to time offer and sell, pursuant to this prospectus, any or all of the Senior Secured Notes, Cash Pay Notes, Non-Cash Pay Notes, shares of common stock issuable upon the conversion of the Non-Cash Pay Notes and shares of common stock owned outright by the selling securityholders. The following tables and footnotes set forth certain information with respect to selling securityholders and the principal amount of Registrable Notes, principal amount of paid-in-kind Non-Cash Pay Notes and the amount of Registrable Shares beneficially owned by each selling securityholder that may be offered under this prospectus. Beneficial ownership has been determined in accordance with the rules of the SEC, and generally means that a person has beneficial ownership of a security if he, she or it possesses sole or shares voting or investment power of that security, and includes any security with respect to which a person has the right to acquire sole or shared voting or investment power within 60 days through the conversion or exercise of any convertible security, warrant, option or other right.

The information in the tables below is based on information provided by or on behalf of the selling securityholders, or our records, the records of the trustee of the Registrable Notes and the records of the transfer agent as of December 14 , 2011.

Our registration of these securities does not necessarily mean that the selling securityholders will sell any or all of the securities covered by this prospectus. See the section, “Plan of Distribution” in this prospectus for additional information about the selling securityholders and the manner in which the selling securityholders may dispose of their securities. In addition, the selling securityholders identified below may have sold, transferred or otherwise disposed of all or a portion of the Registrable Notes or Registrable Shares since the date on which they provided the information regarding their Registrable Notes or Registrable Shares in transactions exempt from the registration requirements of the Securities Act. Except as we otherwise indicate below and under applicable community property laws, we believe that the beneficial owners of the securities listed below have sole voting and investment power with respect to the Registrable Notes and Registrable Shares. Unless set forth below, none of the selling securityholders has nor had within the past three years any material relationship with us or any of our predecessors or affiliates. To our knowledge, except as indicated in the footnotes to the tables below, none of the selling securityholders is a registered broker-dealer or an affiliate thereof.

Information about the selling securityholders may change over time. Any changed information given to us by the selling securityholders may be set forth in amendments or prospectus supplements if and when necessary.

Senior Secured Notes

Name of Selling Securityholder	Principal Amount of Notes Outstanding That are Owned and That May Be Sold Pursuant to This Prospectus*
ADVANCED SERIES TRUST—AST ACADEMIC STRATEGIES ASSET ALLOCATION PORTFOLIO⁽²⁾	$	88,732	†
AMERICAN BEACON SIM HIGH YIELD OPPORTUNITIES FUND⁽³⁾	$	650,000	†
ANDREW B CONRU TRUST⁽⁴⁾	$	77,157,996	†
AQR DELTA MASTER ACCOUNT, L.P.⁽⁵⁾	$	702,138	†
AQR DELTA SAPPHIRE FUND, L.P.⁽⁶⁾	$	104,164	†
AQR FUNDS—AQR DIVERSIFIED ARBITRAGE FUND⁽⁷⁾	$	856,454	†
AQR OPPORTUNISTIC PREMIUM OFFSHORE FUND, L.P.⁽⁸⁾	$	111,879	†
CNH DIVERSIFIED OPPORTUNITIES MASTER ACCOUNT, L.P.⁽⁹⁾	$	65,585	†
DEL MAR MASTER FUND, LTD⁽¹⁰⁾	$	19,227,391	†

Name of Selling Securityholder	Principal Amount of Notes Outstanding That are Owned and That May Be Sold Pursuant to This Prospectus*
PERMAL CAPITAL STRUCTURE OPPORTUNITIES, LTD⁽¹¹⁾	$	1,410,000	†
QWEST PENSION TRUST⁽¹²⁾	$	1,025,000	†
ROCKVIEW SHORT ALPHA FUND, LTD⁽¹³⁾	$	3,351,445	†
ROCKVIEW TRADING, LTD⁽¹⁴⁾	$	24,843,719	†
STONEHILL INSTITUTIONAL PARTNERS LP⁽¹⁵⁾	$	19,300,721	†
STONEHILL MASTER FUND LTD⁽¹⁶⁾	$	23,755,535	†
THORNBURG STRATEGIC INCOME FUND⁽¹⁷⁾	$	578,685	†
VISIUM BALANCED MASTER FUND LTD⁽¹⁸⁾	$	1,424,400	†
VISIUM CREDIT MASTER FUND LTD⁽¹⁹⁾	$	17,304,633	†
VISIUM EQUITY GLOBAL MASTER FUND LTD⁽²⁰⁾	$	4,459,650	†
TOTAL	$	196,418,127	†

Amounts have been rounded to the nearest dollar.

†

Less than 1%.

(1)

Based on the aggregate principal amount of Senior Secured Notes outstanding of $235,331,887.

(2)

Advanced Series Trust — AST Academic Strategies Asset Allocation Portfolio (“AST”) is an affiliate of Pruco Securities, LLC, Prudential Investment Management Services LLC and Prudential Annuities Distributors, Inc., which are broker-dealers registered pursuant to Section 15 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934. AST purchased the notes in the ordinary course of business and at the time of the purchase of the notes, it had no agreements or understandings with any person to distribute the securities. CNH Partners, LLC is the sub-advisor of AST. CNH Partners, LLC is controlled indirectly by Mr. Todd Pulvino and Mr. Mark Mitchell. Accordingly, Mr. Pulvino and Mr. Mitchell share voting and investment power over the notes owned by AST. AQR Capital Management, LLC acts as the investment manager to the Diversified Arbitrage investment arm of AST. The address of AST is c/o AQR Capital Management, LLC, Two Greenwich Plaza, 3^rd Floor, Greenwich, CT 06830.

(3)

Strategic Income Management is the investment subadvisor to American Beacon Sim High Yield Opportunities Fund. Mr. Gary Pokrzywinski is the portfolio manager of Strategic Income Management and has sole voting and investment power over the notes owned by American Beacon Sim High Yield Opportunities Fund. The address of American Beacon Sim High Yield Opportunities Fund is 4151 Amon Carter Blvd., MD 2450, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

(4)

To the best of our knowledge, Andrew Conru holds voting and investment power over the notes owned by the Andrew B. Conru Trust. The address of the Andrew B. Conru Trust is c/o Bose McKinney & Evans LLP 111 Monument Circle, Suite 2700, Indianapolis, IN 46204.

(5)

The general partner of AQR DELTA Master Account, L.P. is AQR Capital Management III, LLC. AQR Capital Management, LLC is the sole member of AQR Capital Management III, LLC. AQR Capital Management Holdings, LLC is the sole member of AQR Capital Management, LLC. Mr. Clifford S. Asness is a greater than 25% shareholder of AQR Capital Management Holdings, LLC. CNH Partners, LLC is the sub-advisor of AQR DELTA Master Account, L.P. CNH Partners, LLC is controlled indirectly by Mr. Todd Pulvino and Mr. Mark Mitchell. Accordingly, Mr. Pulvino and Mr. Mitchell share voting and investment power over the notes owned by AQR DELTA Master Account, L.P. The address of AQR DELTA Master Account, L.P. is c/o AQR Capital Management, LLC, Two Greenwich Plaza, 3rd Floor, Greenwich, CT 06830.

(6)

The general partner of AQR DELTA Sapphire Fund, L.P. is AQR Capital Management II, LLC. AQR Capital Management, LLC is the sole member of AQR Capital Management II, LLC. AQR Capital Management Holdings, LLC is the sole member of AQR Capital Management, LLC. Mr. Clifford S. Asness is a greater than 25% shareholder of AQR Capital Management Holdings, LLC. CNH Partners, LLC is the sub-advisor of AQR DELTA Sapphire Fund, L.P. CNH Partners, LLC is controlled indirectly by Mr. Todd Pulvino and Mr. Mark Mitchell. Accordingly, Mr. Pulvino and Mr. Mitchell share voting and investment power over the notes owned by AQR DELTA Sapphire Fund, L.P. The address of AQR DELTA Sapphire Fund, L.P. is c/o AQR Capital Management, LLC, Two Greenwich Plaza, 3rd Floor, Greenwich, CT 06830.

(7)

CNH Partners, LLC is the sub-advisor of AQR Funds — AQR Diversified Arbitrage Fund. CNH Partners, LLC is controlled indirectly by Mr. Todd Pulvino and Mr. Mark Mitchell. Accordingly, Mr. Pulvino and Mr. Mitchell share voting and investment power over the notes owned by AQR Funds — AQR Diversified Arbitrage Fund. AQR Funds — AQR Diversified Arbitrage Fund is a series of the Delaware Statutory Trust, AQR Funds (the “Trust”). AQR Capital Management, LLC acts as the investment advisor to the Trust. The address of AQR Funds — AQR Diversified Arbitrage Fund is c/o AQR Capital Management, LLC, Two Greenwich Plaza, 3^rd Floor, Greenwich, CT 06830.

(8)

Partners, LLC is the sub-advisor of AQR Opportunistic Premium Offshore Fund, L.P. CNH Partners, LLC is controlled indirectly by Mr. Todd Pulvino and Mr. Mark Mitchell. Accordingly, Mr. Pulvino and Mr. Mitchell share voting and investment power over the notes owned by AQR Opportunistic Premium Offshore Fund, L.P. The address of AQR Opportunistic Premium Offshore Fund, L.P. is c/o AQR Capital Management, LLC, Two Greenwich Plaza, 3rd Floor, Greenwich, CT 06830.

(9)

The general partner of CNH Diversified Opportunities Master Account, L.P. is CNH Principal Partners I, LLC. CNH Partners, LLC is the sole member of CNH Principal Partners I, LLC. RAIM Corp. is a 50% owner of CNH Partners, LLC. Mr. Todd Pulvino and Mr. Mark Mitchell are each 50% owners of RAIM Corp. AQR Capital Management, LLC is a 50% owner of CNH Partners, LLC. AQR Capital Management Holdings, LLC is the sole member of AQR Capital Management, LLC. Mr. Clifford S. Asness is a greater than 25% shareholder of AQR Capital Management Holdings, LLC. CNH Partners, LLC is the sub-advisor of CNH Diversified Opportunities Master Account, L.P. CNH Partners, LLC is controlled indirectly by Mr. Todd Pulvino and Mr. Mark Mitchell. Accordingly, Mr. Pulvino and Mr. Mitchell share voting and investment power over the notes owned by CNH Diversified Opportunities Master Account, L.P. The address of CNH Diversified Opportunities Master Account, L.P. is Two Greenwich Plaza, 3rd Floor, Greenwich, CT 06830.

(10)

Mr. Marc Simon is the Director of Del Mar Master Fund, Ltd. Del Mar Asset Management, LP is the advisor to Del Mar Master Fund, Ltd. The general partner of Del Mar Asset Management, LP is Del Mar Management, LLC. David Freelove is the president, chief executive officer and a managing member of Del Mar Management, LLC and has sole voting and investment power over the notes owned by Del Mar Master Fund, Ltd. The address of Del Mar Master Fund, Ltd. is c/o Walkers Financial Svcs, 83 Mary St., Georgetown, Grand Cayman KY1-9005 Cayman Islands.

(11)

Sandler Capital Management is the Investment Manager for Permal Capital Structure Opportunities, Ltd. (“PCSO”) and SERF Corp. is a General Partner in Sandler Capital Management. The controlling entity of PCSO is Citco Bank and Trust Company, Ltd. Mr. Doug Schimmel holds sole voting and investment power over the notes held by Permal Capital Structure Opportunities, Ltd. The address of PCSO is 711 5^th Ave., 15^th Floor, New York, NY 10022.

(12)

GoldenTree Asset Management LP, a Delaware limited partnership, is the investment manager to Qwest Pension Trust. The general partner of GoldenTree Asset Management LP is GoldenTree Asset Management LLC. The senior managing member and sole member of GoldenTree Asset Management LLC is Mr. Steven A. Tananbaum, who has sole voting and investment power over the notes owned by Qwest Pension Trust. The address for Qwest Pension Trust is c/o GoldenTree Asset Management, LP, 485 Lexington Ave., 15^th Floor, New York, NY 10017.

(13)

Mr. Kevin Schweitzer is the managing member of Zabak Capital, LLC and holds sole voting and investment power over the notes owned by Rockview Short Alpha Fund, Ltd. Zabak Capital, LLC is the managing member of Rockview Management, LLC. Rockview Management, LLC is the investment manager to Rockview Short Alpha Fund, Ltd. The address of Rockview Short Alpha Fund, Ltd. is MetroCenter, One Station Place, 7^th Floor, Stamford, CT 06902.

(14)

Mr. Kevin Schweitzer is the managing member of Zabak Capital, LLC and holds sole voting and investment power over the notes owned by RockView Trading, Ltd. Zabak Capital, LLC is the managing member of RockView Management LLC. Rockview Management, LLC is the investment manager to RockView Trading, Ltd. The address of Rockview Trading, Ltd. is MetroCenter, One Station Place, 7^th Floor, Stamford, CT 06902.

(15)

Stonehill Capital Management LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“SCM”), is the investment advisor of Stonehill Institutional Partners, L.P. (“Stonehill Institutional”) and Stonehill General Partner, LLC, (“Stonehill GP”) is the General Partner of Stonehill Institutional. Mr. John Motulsky, Mr. Christopher Wilson, Mr. Wayne Teetsel, Mr. Thomas Varkey, Mr. Jonathan Sacks, Mr. Peter Sisitsky and Mr. Michael Thoyer (collectively, the “Members”) are the managing members of SCM and Stonehill GP and therefore share voting and investment power over the notes owned by Stonehill Institutional. The address of Stonehill Institutional is c/o Stonehill Capital Management LLC, 885 Third Avenue, 30^th Floor, New York, NY 10022.

(16)

Stonehill Capital Management LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“SCM”) is the investment advisor of Stonehill Master Fund Ltd (“Stonehill Master”). Mr. John Motulsky, Mr. Christopher Wilson, Mr. Wayne Teetsel, Mr. Thomas Varkey, Mr. Jonathan Sacks, Mr. Peter Sisitsky and Mr. Michael Thoyer (collectively, the “Members”) are the managing members of SCM and therefore share voting and investment power over the notes owned by Stonehill Master. The address of Stonehill Master is c/o Stonehill Capital Management LLC, 885 Third Avenue, 30^th Floor, New York, NY 10022.

(17)

Thornburg Strategic Income Fund is an affiliate of a broker-dealer registered pursuant to Section 15 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934. Thornburg Strategic Income Fund purchased the notes in the ordinary course of business and at the time of the purchase of the notes, it had no agreements or understandings with any person to distribute the securities. Mr. Jason Brady is the portfolio manager of Thornburg Strategic Income Fund and therefore has sole voting and investment power over the notes owned by Thornburg Strategic Income Fund. The address of Thornburg Strategic Income Fund is 2300 North Ridgetop Road, Santa Fe, NM 87506.

(18)

Visium Asset Management, LP has discretionary trading authority over these notes. The General Partner of Visium Asset Management, LP is JG Asset, LLC. Mr. Jacob Gottlieb and Mr. Mark Gottlieb are the holders of membership interests in JG Asset, LLC and therefore share voting and investment power over the notes owned by Visium Balanced Master Fund Ltd. The address of Visium Balanced Master Fund, Ltd. is c/o Visium Asset Management, LP, 950 Third Avenue, 29^th Floor, New York, NY 10022.

(19)

Visium Asset Management, LP has discretionary trading authority over these notes. The General Partner of Visium Asset Management, LP is JG Asset, LLC. Mr. Jacob Gottlieb and Mr. Mark Gottlieb are the holders of membership interests in JG Asset, LLC and therefore share voting and investment power over the notes owned by Visium Credit Master Fund Ltd. The address of Visium Credit Master Fund, Ltd. is c/o Visium Asset Management, LP, 950 Third Avenue, 29^th Floor, New York, NY 10022.

(20)

Visium Asset Management, LP has discretionary trading authority over these notes. The General Partner of Visium Asset Management, LP is JG Asset, LLC. Mr. Jacob Gottlieb and Mr. Mark Gottlieb are the holders of membership interests in JG Asset, LLC and therefore share voting and investment power over the notes owned by Visium Equity Global Master Fund Ltd. The address of Visium Equity Global Master Fund, Ltd. is c/o Visium Asset Management, LP, 950 Third Avenue, 29^th Floor, New York, NY 10022.

Cash Pay Notes

Name of Selling Securityholder	Principal Amount of Notes Outstanding That are Owned and That May Be Sold Pursuant to This Prospectus*
MARC H. BELL⁽²⁾	$	5,315,333	†
STATON FAMILY INVESTMENTS LTD⁽³⁾	$	5,315,333	†
TOTAL	$	10,630,66 7	†

Amounts have been rounded to the nearest dollar.

†

Less than 1%.

(1)

Based on the aggregate principal amount of Cash Pay Notes outstanding of $10,630,66 7 .

(2)

Marc H. Bell is our Chief Executive Officer, President and a Director.

(3)

Daniel C. Staton, our Chairman of the Board, is a member of Staton Family Investments, Ltd. and has sole voting and investment power over the notes owned by Staton Family Investments, Ltd. The address of Staton Family Investments, Ltd. is 6800 Broken Sound Parkway, Boca Raton, FL 33487.

Non-Cash Pay Notes And Common Stock

Name of Selling Securityholder	Aggregate Principal Amount of Notes Owned and Outstanding*		Aggregate Principal Amount of Notes Paid-In Kind That May Be Paid^(1)*		Aggregate Principal Amount of Notes That May be Sold*
ABSOLUTE INCOME FUND, LP⁽⁶⁾	$	—	$	—	$	—	—	1,991,703	1,991,703	—	—	0	†
ADVANCED SERIES TRUST — AST ACADEMIC STRATEGIES ASSET ALLOCATION PORTFOLIO⁽⁷⁾	$	237,938	$	88,802	$	326,739	7,883	—	7,883	0	†	0	†
ANDREW B. CONRU TRUST⁽⁸⁾	$	165,409,752	$	61,733,473	$	227,143,225	5,480,112	3,380,879	8,860,991	0	†	0	†
AQR DIVERSIFIED ARBITRAGE FUND⁽⁹⁾	$	2,405,813	$	897,886	$	3,303,699	79,706	—	79,706	0	†	0	†
AQR OPPORTUNISTIC PREMIUM OFFSHORE FUND LP⁽¹⁰⁾	$	264,375	$	98,669	$	363,044	8,759	—	8,759	0	†	0	†
BELL FAMILY 2003 CHARITABLE LEAD ANNUITY TRUST⁽¹¹⁾	$	—	$	—	$	—	—	184,190	184,190	—	—	0	†
MARC H. BELL⁽¹²⁾	$	—	$	—	$	—	—	5,147,671	5,087,668	—	—	60,003	†
BESSEMER TRUST COMPANY, N.A. AND MATTHEW SMYTH AS TRUSTEES OF THE DIETRICH WEISMANN SETTLEMENT TRUST A⁽¹³⁾	$	—	$	—	$	—	—	1,883	1,883	—	—	0	†

Name of Selling Securityholder	Aggregate Principal Amount of Notes Owned and Outstanding*		Aggregate Principal Amount of Notes Paid-In Kind That May Be Paid^(1)*		Aggregate Principal Amount of Notes That May be Sold*
BESSEMER TRUST COMPANY, N.A. AND ROGER KIMBALL AS TRUSTEES OF THE DIETRICH WEISMANN SETTLEMENT TRUST B⁽¹⁴⁾	$	—	$	—	$	—	—	2,152	2,152	—	—	0	†
SHMUEL BRILL AND SUSANNA BRILL⁽¹⁵⁾	$	—	$	—	$	—	—	3,043	3,043	—	—	0	†
CAMHZN MASTER LDC⁽¹⁶⁾	$	—	$	—	$	—	—	25,345	25,345	—	—	0	†
CAMOFI MASTER LDC¹⁷⁾	$	—	$	—	$	—	—	157,132	157,132	—	—	0	†
CEDARVIEW OPPORTUNITIES MASTER FUND, LP⁽¹⁸⁾	$	3,624,243	$	1,352,624	$	4,976,867	120,073	—	120,073	0	†	0	†
CITIGROUP PENSION PLAN — DALTON DISTRESSED CREDIT⁽¹⁹⁾	$	846,000	$	315,740	$	1,161,740	28,028	—	28,028	0	†	0	†
CMI II LLC⁽²⁰⁾	$	—	$	—	$	—	—	428,555	428,555	—	—	0	†
COMMERCE COURT⁽²¹⁾	$	88,125	$	32,889	$	121,015	2,919	—	2,919	—	†	—	†
DALTON DISTRESSED CREDIT (MASTER) FUND LTD⁽²²⁾	$	317,250	$	118,403	$	435,653	10,511	—	10,511	0	†	0	†
DEL MAR MASTER FUND, LTD⁽²³⁾	$	—	$	—	$	—	—	698,180	698,180	—	†	0	†
DG VALUE PARTNERS LP⁽²⁴⁾	$	722,625	$	269,695	$	992,320	23,941	—	23,941	0	†	0	†
EPIC DISTRESSED DEBT OPPORTUNITY MASTER FUND, LTD⁽²⁵⁾	$	—	$	—	$	—	—	354,839	354,839	—	—	0	†
FLORESCUE FAMILY CORPORATION⁽²⁶⁾	$	1,869,439	$	697,704	$	2,567,143	61,936	1,086,366	1,148,302	0	†	0	†
RUSSELL FRYE⁽²⁷⁾	$	—	$	—	$	—	—	133,949	133,949	—	—	0	†
HAYMAN CAPITAL MASTER FUND, LP⁽²⁸⁾	$	12,954,375	$	4,834,773	$	17,789,148	429,185	—	429,185	0	†	0	†
INTERACTIVE BRAND DEVELOPMENT INC⁽²⁹⁾	$	—	$	—	$	—	—	32,965	32,965	—	—	0	†
INVESTIN PRO FMBA DALTON DISTRESSED DEBT⁽³⁰⁾	$	1,374,750	$	513,078	$	1,887,828	45,546	—	45,546	0	†	0	†
MAPSTEAD TRUST ⁽³¹⁾	$	22,247,057	$	8,302,945	$	30,550,002	737,057	512,992	1,250,049	0	†	0	†
PAW ASSOCIATES LLC⁽³²⁾	$	—	$	—	$	—	—	11,454	11,454	—	—	0	†
PERMAL CAPITAL STRUCTURE OPPORTUNITIES LTD⁽³³⁾	$	1,586,250	$	592,013	$	2,178,263	52,553	—	52,553	0	†	0	†
ANDREW RECHTSCHAFFEN⁽³⁴⁾	$	—	$	—	$	—	—	30,414	30,414	—	—	0	†

Name of Selling Securityholder	Aggregate Principal Amount of Notes Owned and Outstanding*		Aggregate Principal Amount of Notes Paid-In Kind That May Be Paid^(1)*		Aggregate Principal Amount of Notes That May be Sold*
ROCKVIEW SHORT ALPHA FUND LTD⁽³⁵⁾	$	—	$	—	$	—	—	82,090	82,090	—	—	†
ROCKVIEW TRADING LTD⁽³⁶⁾	$	1,057,500	$	394,675	$	1,452,175	35,036	556,584	591,620	0	†	†
SG AURORA MASTER FUND LP⁽³⁷⁾	$	528,750	$	197,338	$	726,088	17,518	—	17,518	0	†	†
SPECIAL SITUATIONS, LLC⁽³⁸⁾	$	246,750	$	92,091	$	338,841	8,175	22,075	30,250	0	†	†
SPECIAL SITUATIONS X, LLC⁽³⁹⁾	$	528,750	$	197,338	$	726,088	17,518	—	17,518	0	†	†
STATON FAMILY PERPETUAL TRUST⁽⁴⁰⁾	$	—	$	—	$	—	—	1,688,970	1,688,970	—	—	†
STATON MEDIA LLC⁽⁴¹⁾	$	—	$	—	$	—	—	149,995	149,995	—	—	†
STATON FAMILY INVESTMENTS LTD⁽⁴²⁾	$	—	$	—	$	—	—	3,432,893	3,432,893	—	—	†
STONEHILL INSTITUTIONAL PARTNERS LP⁽⁴³⁾	$	5,917,274	$	2,208,418	$	8,125,692	196,042	353,105	549,147	0	†	†
STONEHILL MASTER FUND LTD⁽⁴⁴⁾	$	11,596,359	$	4,327,940	$	15,924,300	384,193	868,724	1,252,917	0	†	†
STRATEGIC MEDIA I LLC⁽⁴⁵⁾	$	—	$	—	$	—	—	1,274,165	1,274,165	—	—	†
VISIUM BALANCED MASTER FUND LTD⁽⁴⁶⁾	$	2,013,480	$	751,462	$	2,764,942	66,708	—	66,708	0	†	†
VISIUM CREDIT MASTER FUND LTD⁽⁴⁷⁾	$	3,274,020	$	1,221,915	$	4,495,935	108,470	—	108,470	0	†	†
VISIUM EQUITY GLOBAL MASTER FUND LTD⁽⁴⁸⁾	$	—	$	—	$	—	—	81,812	81,812	—	—	†
THE WEISMANN FOUNDATION⁽⁴⁹⁾	$	—	$	—	$	—	—	15,634	15,634	—	—	†
THE 2007 AIDAN STIRLING WEISMANN TRUST⁽⁵⁰⁾	$	—	$	—	$	—	—	407	407	—	—	†
DIETRICH WEISMANN CHARITABLE LEAD ANNUITY TRUST (LUCY MANAGED) ⁽⁵¹⁾	$	—	$	—	$	—	—	1,219	1,219	—	—	†
DIETRICH WEISMANN CHARITABLE LEAD ANNUITY TRUST (PAUL MANAGED)⁽⁵²⁾	$	—	$	—	$	—	—	1,219	1,219	—	—	†
DIETRICH WEISMANN REVOCABLE TRUST⁽⁵³⁾	$	—	$	—	$	—	—	37,454	37,454	—	—	†
THE 2005 OWEN AYRTON WEISMANN TRUST⁽⁵⁴⁾	$	—	$	—	$	—	—	507	507	—	—	†
PAUL A. WEISMANN⁽⁵⁵⁾	$	—	$	—	$	—	—	292	292	—	—	†
PAUL A. WEISMANN DESCENDANTS TRUST⁽⁵⁶⁾	$	—	$	—	$	—	—	2,866	2,866	—	—	†

Name of Selling Securityholder	Aggregate Principal Amount of Notes Owned and Outstanding*		Aggregate Principal Amount of Notes Paid-In Kind That May Be Paid^(1)*		Aggregate Principal Amount of Notes That May be Sold*
PHILLIPA V. WEISMANN⁽⁵⁷⁾	$	—	$	—	$	—	—	2,691	2,691	—	—	0	†
LUCY C. VELTRI⁽⁵⁸⁾	$	—	$	—	$	—	—	292	292	—	—	0	†
ZELL CREDIT OPPORTUNITIES MASTER FUND LP⁽⁵⁹⁾	$	10,575,000	$	3,946,753	$	14,521,753	350,355	—	350,355	0	†	0	†
2B LLC⁽⁶⁰⁾	$	1,163,250	$	434,143	$	1,597,393	38,539	—	38,539	0	†	0	†
TOTAL	$	250,849,125	$	93,620,767	$	344,469,892	8,310,763	22,756,706	31,007,466	0	†	60,003	†

Amounts have been rounded to the nearest dollar.

†

Less than 1%.

(1)

Equals the maximum aggregate principal amount of Non-Cash Pay Notes that may be paid-in-kind in respect of interest payments.

(2)

Includes the aggregate number of shares of common stock held upon full conversion of the Non-Cash Pay Notes and shares held outright that may be sold pursuant to this Prospectus.

(3)

Based on the aggregate principal amount of Non-Cash Pay Notes outstanding of $250,849,125 and $93,620,767 of Non-Cash Pay Notes that may be paid-in-kind in respect of interest payments.

(4)

The shares and percentages reflected in these columns reflect the aggregate number of shares of common stock held upon full conversion of the Non-Cash Pay Notes and shares held outright by certain selling securityholders after public resale of all shares that may be sold pursuant to this Prospectus.

(5)

Based on 31,219,644 shares of our common stock outstanding as of December 14, 2011.

(6)

Shares of common stock beneficially owned consist of 1,753,028 shares of common stock and 238,675 shares of common stock held at Cede & Co. through a brokerage account with J.P. Morgan Bank. Income Fund GP Limited (“IFGPL”) is the general partner of Absolute Income Fund, L.P. Ben Christian Rispoli is the sole director of IFGPL. Greymoor International Limited is the sole stockholder of IFGPL and is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Neville Holdings Group Limited. Olivier Claude Michel Bassou and Olivier Pierre Adam are the directors of Greymoor International Limited and Neville Holdings Group Limited. Mr. Rispoli, Mr. Bassou and Mr. Adam share voting and investment power over the shares held by Absolute Income Fund, L.P. The address of Absolute Income Fund, L.P. is c/o Lainston International Management Ltd., Suite 4-213-4 Governors Square, PO Box 31298, Grand Cayman, KY1-1206, Cayman Islands.

(7)

Advanced Series Trust —AST Academic Strategies Asset Allocation Portfolio (“AST”) is an affiliate of Pruco Securities, LLC, Prudential Investment Management Services LLC and Prudential Annuities Distributors, Inc., which are broker-dealers registered pursuant to Section 15 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934. AST purchased the notes in the ordinary course of business and at the time of the purchase of the notes, it had no agreements or understandings with any person to distribute the securities. CNH Partners, LLC is the sub-advisor of AST. CNH Partners, LLC is controlled indirectly by Mr. Todd Pulvino and Mr. Mark Mitchell. Accordingly, Mr. Pulvino and Mr. Mitchell share voting and investment power over the notes owned by AST. AQR Capital Management, LLC acts as the investment manager to the Diversified Arbitrage investment arm of AST. The address of AST is c/o AQR Capital Management, LLC, Two Greenwich Plaza, 3rd Floor, Greenwich, CT 06830.

(8)

To the best of our knowledge, Andrew Conru holds voting and investment power over the notes and shares held by the Andrew B. Conru Trust. The address of the Andrew B. Conru Trust Agreement is c/o Bose Mckinney & Evans, LLP, 111 Monument Circle, Suite 2700, Indianapolis, IN 46204.

(9)

CNH Partners, LLC is the sub-advisor of AQR Diversified Arbitrage Fund. CNH Partners, LLC is controlled indirectly by Mr. Todd Pulvino and Mr. Mark Mitchell. Accordingly, Mr. Pulvino and Mr. Mitchell share voting and investment power over the notes owned by AQR Diversified Arbitrage Fund. The address of AQR Diversified Arbitrage Fund is c/o AQR Capital Management, LLC, Two Greenwich Plaza, 3rd Floor, Greenwich, CT 06830.

(10)

The general partner of AQR Opportunistic Premium Offshore Fund, L.P. is AQR Capital Management III, LLC. AQR Capital Management, LLC is the sole member of AQR Capital Management III, LLC. AQR Capital Management Holdings, LLC is the sole member of AQR Capital Management, LLC. Mr. Clifford S. Asness is a greater than 25% shareholder of AQR Capital Management Holdings, LLC. CNH Partners, LLC is the sub-advisor of AQR Opportunistic Premium Offshore Fund, L.P. CNH Partners, LLC is controlled indirectly by Mr. Todd Pulvino and Mr. Mark Mitchell. Accordingly, Mr. Pulvino and Mr. Mitchell share voting and investment power over the notes owned by AQR Opportunistic Premium Offshore Fund, L.P. The address of AQR Opportunistic Premium Offshore Fund, L.P. is c/o AQR Capital Management, LLC, Two Greenwich Plaza, 3rd Floor, Greenwich, CT 06830.

(11)

Mr. Marc H. Bell is the trustee and has sole voting and investment power over the shares owned by the trust. The shares are held in trust for the benefit of Mr. Bell’s children. The address of the Bell Family 2003 Charitable Lead Annuity Trust is 6800 Broken Sound Parkway, Boca Raton, FL 33487.

(12)

Marc H. Bell is our Chief Executive Officer, President and a Director. The address for Mr. Bell is 6800 Broken Sound Parkway, Boca Raton, FL 33487. The shares reflected in the column “Number of Shares of Common Stock Owned After This Offering” are shares of common stock owned outright by Mr. Bell and are not being offered for public resale by Mr. Bell under this Prospectus.

(13)

Bessemer Trust Company, N.A. and Mr. Matthew Smyth are the trustees of the Dietrich Weismann Settlement Trust A and share voting and dispositive power over the shares held by the Dietrich Weismann Settlement Trust A. The address of the Dietrich Weismann Settlement Trust A is c/o Bessemer Trust Co., 100 Woodbridge Center Drive, Woodbridge, NJ 07095, Attn: Custody Asset Transfer Unit.

(14)

Bessemer Trust Company, N.A. and Mr. Roger Kimball are the trustees of the Dietrich Weismann Settlement Trust B and share voting and dispositive power over the shares held by the Dietrich Weismann Settlement Trust B. The address of the Dietrich Weismann Settlement Trust B is c/o Bessemer Trust Co., 100 Woodbridge Center Drive, Woodbridge, NJ 07095, Attn: Custody Asset Transfer Unit.

(15)

Mr. and Mrs. Brill share voting and investment power over their shares of common stock. The address for Shmuel & Susana Brill is 1 Landmark Square, FL4 Stamford, CT 06901.

(16)

Centrecourt Asset Management LLC is the investment advisor to CAMHZN Master LDC. Mr. Richard Smithline is a managing member and a director of Centrecourt Asset Management LLC and therefore has sole voting and investment power over the shares of common stock owned by Camhzn Master LDC. The address of CAMHZN Master LDC is c/o Centrecourt Asset Management LLC, 350 Madison Avenue, 8th Floor, New York, NY 10017.

(17)

Centrecourt Asset Management LLC is the investment advisor to CAMOFI Master LDC. Mr. Richard Smithline is the managing member and a director of Centrecourt Asset Management LLC and therefore has sole voting and investment power over the shares of common stock owned by Camofi Master LDC. The address of CAMOFI Master LDC is c/o Centrecourt Asset Management LLC, 350 Madison Avenue, 8th Floor, New York, NY 10017.

(18)

The General Partner of Cedarview Opportunities Master Fund, LP is Cedarview GP, LLC. Mr. Burton Weinstein is the holder of the membership interests in Cedarview GP, LLC and therefore has sole voting and investment power over the notes owned by Cedarview Opportunities Master Fund, LP. The address of Cedarview Opportunities Master Fund, LP is One Penn Plaza, 45th Floor, New York, NY 10119.

(19)

Mr. Arthur Hebert is the senior managing director and chief financial officer of Dalton Investments LLC, which is the investment advisor to Citigroup Pension Plan — Dalton Distressed Credit. Mr. Herbert, Mr. Steve Persky, Ms. Michelle Lynd and Mr. Todd Sherer all share voting and investment power over the notes held by Citigroup Pension Plan — Dalton Distressed Credit. The address of Citigroup Pension Plan — Dalton Distressed Credit is c/o Dalton Investments LLC, 1601 Cloverfield Boulevard, Suite 5050N Santa Monica, CA 90404.

(20)

CMI II, LLC is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Castlerigg Master Investments Ltd. Sandell Asset Management Corp. is the investment manager of Castlerigg Investments Ltd. Thomas Sandell is the controlling person of Sandell Asset Management Corp. and therefore has sole voting and investment power over the shares of common stock owned by CMI II LLC. The address of CMI II LLC is c/o Sandell Asset Management Corp., 40 West 57th Street, 26th Floor, New York, New York 10019.

(21)

DG Capital Management, LLC is the investment manager for Commerce Court. Dov Gertzulin is the managing member of DG Capital Management, LLC and has sole voting and investment power over the notes held by Commerce Court. The address of Commerce Court is c/o DG Capital Management, LLC, 460 Park Avenue, 13th Floor, New York, NY 10022.

(22)

Mr. Arthur Hebert is the senior managing director and chief financial officer of Dalton Investments LLC, which is the investment advisor to Dalton Distressed Credit (Master) Fund Ltd. Mr. Herbert, Mr. Steve Persky, Ms. Michelle Lynd and Mr. Todd Sherer all share voting and investment power over the notes held by Dalton Distressed Credit (Master) Fund Ltd. The address of Dalton Distressed Credit (Master) Fund Ltd is c/o Dalton Investments LLC, 1601 Cloverfield Boulevard, Suite 5050N Santa Monica, CA 90404.

(23)

Mr. Marc Simon is the Director of Del Mar Master Fund, Ltd. Del Mar Asset Management, LP is the advisor to Del Mar Master Fund, Ltd. The general partner of Del Mar Asset Management, LP is Del Mar Management, LLC. David Freelove is the president, chief executive officer and a managing member of Del Mar Management, LLC and has sole voting and investment power over the shares of common stock owned by Del Mar Master Fund, Ltd. The address of Del Mar Master Fund, Ltd. is c/o Walkers Financial Svcs, 83 Mary St., Georgetown, Grand Cayman KY1-9005 Cayman Islands.

(24)

DG Capital Management, LLC is the investment manager to DG Value Partners, LP. Mr. Dov Gertzulin is the managing member of DG Capital Management, LLC and has sole voting and investment power over the notes held by DG Value Partners, LP. The address of DG Value Partners, LP is c/o DG Capital Management, LLC, 460 Park Avenue, 13th Floor, New York, NY 10022.

(25)

Citigroup Alternative Investments LLC, a registered investment advisor, is the investment manager to Epic Distressed Debt Opportunity Master Fund Ltd. Herbert E. Seit and James J. Duplessie are the controlling persons of the investment manager and therefore have shared voting and investment power over the shares of common stock owned by Epic Distressed Debt Opportunity Master Fund, Ltd. Citigroup Alternative Investments LLC is an affiliate of Citigroup, which is a broker-dealer registered pursuant to Section 15 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Epic Distressed Debt Opportunity Master Fund purchased the shares of common stock in the ordinary course of business and at the time of the purchase of the shares of common stock, it had no agreements or understandings with any person to distribute the securities. The address of Epic Distressed Debt Opportunity Master Fund, Ltd. is c/o Citi Alternative Investments, 399 Park Avenue, 7th Floor, New York, New York 10022.

(26)

Mr. Barry Florescue is President of Florescue Family Corporation and has voting and investment power over the notes and shares of common stock owned by Florescue Family Corporation. The address of Florescue Family Corporation is 50 E. Sample Rd, Suite 400, Pompano Beach, Florida 30064.

(27)

Mr. Russell Frye has voting and investment power over his own shares of common stock. The address for Mr. Frye is 4045 NW 58th Place, Boca Raton, FL 33496.

(28)

Hayman Capital Management, L.P., the controlling entity of Hayman Capital Master Fund L.P., and Hayman Offshore Management, Inc. (Cayman Islands) are the General Partners of Hayman Capital Master Fund L.P. Hayman Investments, LLC is the General Partner of Hayman Capital Management, L.P. Mr. J. Kyle Bass is the owner of Hayman Investments, LLC, Hayman Capital Management, L.P. and Hayman Offshore Management, Inc., individually and through trust vehicles and therefore has sole voting and investment power over the notes owned by Hayman Capital Master Fund, L.P. The address of Hayman Capital Master Fund L.P. is 2101 Cedar Springs Road, Dallas, TX 75201.

(29)

These shares of common stock were issued in November 2011 upon the exchange of the 32,965 shares of Series B common stock previously owned for 32,965 shares of common stock. Mr. Steve Markley is the President, Chief Executive Officer and sole director of Interactive Brand Development, Inc., and has sole voting and investment power over its shares. The address of Interactive Brand Development, Inc. is 934 N University Drive, Coral Springs, FL 33071.

(30)

Mr. Arthur Hebert is the senior managing director and chief financial officer of Dalton Investments LLC, which is the investment advisor to Investin Pro FMBA Dalton Distressed Debt. Mr. Herbert, Mr. Steve Persky, Ms. Michelle Lynd and Mr. Todd Sherer all share voting and investment power over the notes held by Investin Pro FMBA Dalton Distressed Debt. The address of Investin Pro FMBA Dalton Distressed Debt is c/o Dalton Investments LLC, 1601 Cloverfield Boulevard, Suite 5050N Santa Monica, CA 90404.

(31)

Mr. Lars Mapstead and Mrs. Marin Mapstead are trustees of the Mapstead Trust, created on April 16, 2002 and hold shared voting and investment power over notes and shares of common stock owned by the Mapstead Trust. The address of Mapstead Trust is c/o Bose Mckinney & Evans LLP, 111 Monument Circle, Suite 2700, Indianapolis, IN 46204.

(32)

Mr. Paul Weismann is the Manager of PAW Associates, LLC and therefore has sole voting and investment power over the shares of common stock owned by PAW Associates LLC. The address of PAW Associates, LLC is 1 Landmark Square, FL4, Stamford, CT 06901.

(33)

Sandler Capital Management is the investment manager for Permal Capital Structure Opportunities, Ltd. (“PCSO”) and SERF Corp. is a general partner of Sandler Capital Management. The controlling entity of PCSO is Citco Bank and Trust Company, Ltd. Mr. Doug Schimmel holds sole voting and investment power over the notes held by Permal Capital Structure Opportunities, Ltd. The address of PCSO is 711 5th Ave., 15th Floor, New York, NY 10022.

(34)

Mr. Andrew Rechtschaffen has voting and investment power over his own shares of common stock. The address for Mr. Rechtschaffen is JP Morgan Chase FAO Andrew Rechtschaffen, 500 Stanton Christiana Road, Newark, DE 19713.

(35)

Mr. Kevin Schweitzer is the managing member of Zabak Capital, LLC and has sole voting and investment power over the shares of common stock owned by Rockview Short Alpha Fund, Ltd., Zabak Capital LLC is the managing member of Rockview Management, LLC. Rockview Management, LLC is the investment manager to Rockview Short Alpha Fund, Ltd. The address of Rockview Short Alpha Fund, Ltd. is MetroCenter, One Station Place, 7th Floor, Stamford, CT 06902.

(36)

Mr. Kevin Schweitzer is the managing member of Zabak Capital, LLC and holds sole voting and investment power over the notes and shares of common stock held by RockView Trading, Ltd. Zabak Capital, LLC is the managing member of RockView Management LLC. Rockview Management, LLC is the investment manager to RockView Trading, Ltd. The address of Rockview Trading, Ltd. is MetroCenter, One Station Place, 7th Floor, Stamford, CT 06902.

(37)

Sheldon Goldman has voting and dispositive power over the notes owned by SG Aurora Master Fund L.P. The address of SG Aurora Master Fund L.P. is 825 Third Ave., 34th Floor, New York, NY 10022.

(38)

DG Capital Management, LLC is the investment manager for Special Situations, LLC. Dov Gertzulin is the managing member of DG Capital Management, LLC and has sole voting and investment power over the notes held by Special Situations, LLC. The address of Special Situations, LLC is c/o DG Capital Management, LLC, 460 Park Avenue, 13th Floor, New York, NY 10022.

(39)

DG Capital Management, LLC is the investment manager for Special Situations X, LLC. Dov Gertzulin is the managing member of DG Capital Management, LLC and has sole voting and investment power over the notes held by Special Situations X, LLC. The address of Special Situations X, LLC is c/o DG Capital Management, LLC, 460 Park Avenue, 13th Floor, New York, NY 10022.

(40)

Mr. Staton is the trustee of Staton Family Perpetual Trust and has sole voting and investment power over the shares of common stock owned by the Staton Family Perpetual Trust, which are held in trust for the benefit of his minor children. The address of Staton Family Perpetual Trust is 6800 Broken Sound Parkway, Boca Raton, FL 33487.

(41)

Mr. Staton is a member and the manager of Staton Media LLC and therefore has sole voting and investment power over the shares of common stock owned by Staton Media LLC. The address of Staton Media LLC is 6800 Broken Sound Parkway, Boca Raton, FL 33487.

(42)

Mr. Staton is a member of Staton Family Investments, Ltd. and has sole voting and investment power over the shares of common stock owned by Staton Family Investment, Ltd. The address of Staton Family Investments, Ltd. is 6800 Broken Sound Parkway, Boca Raton, FL 33487.

(43)

Stonehill Capital Management LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“SCM”), is the investment advisor of Stonehill Institutional Partners, L.P. (“Stonehill Institutional”) and Stonehill General Partner, LLC, (“Stonehill GP”) is the General Partner of Stonehill Institutional. Mr. John Motulsky, Mr. Christopher Wilson, Mr. Wayne Teetsel, Mr. Thomas Varkey, Mr. Jonathan Sacks, Mr. Peter Sisitsky and Mr. Michael Thoyer (collectively, the “Members”) are the managing members of SCM and Stonehill GP and share voting and investment power over the notes and shares of common stock owned by Stonehill Institutional. The address of Stonehill Institutional is c/o Stonehill Capital Management LLC, 885 Third Avenue, 30th Floor, New York, NY 10022.

(44)

Stonehill Capital Management LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“SCM”) is the investment advisor of Stonehill Master Fund Ltd (“Stonehill Master”). Mr. John Motulsky, Mr. Christopher Wilson, Mr. Wayne Teetsel, Mr. Thomas Varkey, Mr. Jonathan Sacks, Mr. Peter Sisitsky and Mr. Michael Thoyer (collectively, the “Members”) are the managing members of SCM and share voting and investment power over the notes and shares of common stock owned by Stonehill Master. The address of Stonehill Master is c/o Stonehill Capital Management LLC, 885 Third Avenue, 30th Floor, New York, NY 10022.

(45)

The following shares are owned by the members of Strategic Media I LLC: 318,541 shares held by the Bell Family 2000 Trust; 318,541 shares held by Staton Family Investments, Ltd.; 79,635 shares held by James LaChance, a member of the Board of Directors of FriendFinder Networks, Inc., and his wife, Hilary LaChance; 238,906 shares held by Equity Acquisition LLC; 159,271 shares held by PJJZRL, LLC; and 159,271 shares held by the Millenium Gift Trust. The shares held by the Bell Family 2000 Trust are held in trust for the benefit of Mr. Bell’s children. Mr. Staton has sole voting and investment power over the shares of common stock owned by Strategic Media I LLC in his capacity as a member of Staton Family Investments, Ltd. The address of Strategic Media I LLC is 6800 Broken Sound Parkway, Boca Raton, FL 33487.

(46)

Visium Asset Management, LP has discretionary authority over these notes. The General Partner of Visium Asset Management, LP is JG Asset, LLC. Mr. Jacob Gottlieb and Mr. Mark Gottlieb are the holders of membership interests in JG Asset, LLC and therefore share voting and investment power over the notes owned by Visium Balanced Master Fund, Ltd. The address of Visium Balanced Master Fund, Ltd. is c/o Visium Asset Management, LP, 950 Third Avenue, 29th Floor, New York, NY 10022.

(47)

Visium Asset Management, LP has discretionary authority over these notes. The General Partner of Visium Asset Management, LP is JG Asset, LLC. Mr. Jacob Gottlieb and Mr. Mark Gottlieb are the holders of membership interests in JG Asset, LLC and therefore share voting and investment power over the notes owned by Visium Credit Master Fund, Ltd. The address for Visium Credit Master Fund, Ltd. is c/o Visium Asset Management LP, 950 Third Avenue, 29th Floor, New York, NY 10022.

(48)

Visium Asset Management, LP has discretionary trading authority over these shares of common stock. The General Partner of Visium Asset Management, LP is JG Asset, LLC. Mr. Jacob Gottlieb and Mr. Mark Gottlieb are the members of JG Asset, LLC and therefore share voting and investment power over the shares of common stock owned by Visium Equity Global Master Fund, Ltd. The address of Visium Equity Global Master Fund, Ltd. is c/o Visium Asset Management, LP, 950 Third Avenue, 29th Floor, New York, NY 10022.

(49)

Mr. Paul Weismann is the trustee of the Weismann Foundation and therefore has sole voting and investment power over the shares of common stock owned by the Weismann Foundation. The address of the Weismann Foundation is 1 Landmark Square, FL4, Stamford, CT 06901.

(50)

Mr. Paul Weismann is the trustee for the 2007 Aidan Stirling Weismann Trust and therefore has sole voting and investment power over the shares of common stock owned by the 2007 Aidan Stirling Weismann Trust. The address of the 2007 Aidan Stirling Weismann Trust is 1 Landmark Square, FL4, Stamford, CT 06901.

(51)

Ms. Lucy Veltri is the manager of the Dietrich Weismann Charitable Lead Annuity Trust (Lucy Managed) and has sole voting and investment power over the shares of common stock held by the Dietrich Weismann Charitable Lead Annuity Trust (Lucy Managed). The address of the Dietrich Weismann Charitable Lead Annuity Trust (Lucy Managed) is c/o Philippa V. Weismann, 115 Central Park West, #8FE, New York, NY 10023.

(52)

Mr. Paul A. Weismann is the manager of the Dietrich Weismann Charitable Lead Annuity Trust (Paul Managed) and has sole voting and investment power over the shares of common stock held by the Dietrich Weismann Charitable Lead Annuity Trust (Paul Managed). The address of the Dietrich Weismann Charitable Lead Annuity Trust (Paul Managed) is c/o Philippa V. Weismann, 115 Central Park West, #8FE, New York, NY 10023.

(53)

Mr. Lawrence Flynn is the trustee of the Dietrich Weismann Revocable Trust and therefore has sole voting and investment power over the shares of common stock owned by the Dietrich Weismann Revocable Trust. The address of the Dietrich Weismann Revocable Trust is 645 Madison Avenue, Floor 14, New York, NY 10022.

(54)

Mr. Paul Weismann is the trustee for the 2005 Owen Ayrton Weismann Trust and therefore has sole voting and investment power over the shares of common stock owned by the 2005 Owen Ayrton Weismann Trust. The address for the 2005 Owen Ayrton Weismann Trust is 1 Landmark Square, FL4, Stamford, CT 06901.

(55)

Mr. Paul A. Weismann has sole voting and investment power over his own shares of common stock. The address of Mr. Weismann is 3141 Salt Point Tpk, Clinton Corners, NY 12514.

(56)

Mr. Paul Weismann is the trustee for the Paul A. Weismann Descendants Trust and therefore has sole voting and investment power over the shares of common stock owned by the Paul A. Weismann Desendants Trust. The address for the Paul A. Weismann Descendants Trust is 1 Landmark Square, FL4, Stamford, CT 06901.

(57)

Ms. Philippa V. Weismann has sole voting and investment power over her own shares. The address of Ms. Weismann is 115 Central Park West, #8FE, New York, NY 10023.

(58)

Ms. Lucy C. Veltri has sole voting and investment power over her own shares. The address of Ms. Veltri is 5250 Advance Mills Road, Earlysville, VA 22963.

(59)

The general partner of Zell Credit Opportunities Master Fund, L.P. is Zell Credit Opportunities (GenPar), L.L.C. Voting and dispositive power over the notes is indirectly held by the trustee of trusts established for the benefit of the family of Samuel Zell, which trusts indirectly own and control Zell Credit Opportunities (GenPar), L.L.C. The trustee of each of the trusts is Chai Trust Company, LLC. The managing member of Chai Trust Company, LLC is EGI Investors, L.L.C. The members of the board of managers of Chai Trust Company, LLC are Matthew Zell, JoAnn Zell, Kellie Zell, Jon Wasserman, Donald Liebentritt and Leah Zell Wanger (collectively, the “Board”). The Board has voting and investment power over the notes owned by Zell Credit Opportunities Master Fund, L.P. The address of Zell Credit Opportunities Master Fund, L.P. is 2 North Riverside Plaza, Suite 600, Chicago, IL 60606.

(60)

Mr. Arthur Hebert is the senior managing director and chief financial officer of Dalton Investments LLC, which is the investment advisor to 2B LLC. Mr. Herbert, Mr. Steve Persky, Ms. Michelle Lynd and Mr. Todd Sherer all share voting and investment power over the notes held by 2B LLC. The address of 2B LLC is c/o Dalton Investments LLC, 1601 Cloverfield Boulevard, Suite 5050N Santa Monica, CA 90404.

BUSINESS

Company Overview

We are a leading internet and technology company providing services in the rapidly expanding markets of social networking and web-based video sharing. Our business consists of creating and operating technology platforms which run several of the most heavily visited websites in the world. Through our extensive network of more than 44,000 websites, since our inception, we have built a base of more than 484 million registrants and more than 320 million members in more than 200 countries. We are able to create and maintain, in a cost-effective manner, websites intended to appeal to users of diverse cultures and interest groups. In December 2010, we had more than 196 million unique visitors to our network of websites, according to comScore. We offer our members a wide variety of online services so that they can interact with each other and access the content available on our websites. Our most heavily visited websites include AdultFriendFinder.com, Amigos.com, AsiaFriendFinder.com, Cams.com, FriendFinder.com, BigChurch.com and SeniorFriendFinder.com. For the nine months ended September 30, 2011, we had net revenue, income from operations and net losses of $249.6 million, $52.4 million and ($20.9) million, respectively. For the year ended December 31, 2010 we had net revenue, income from operations and net losses of $346.0 million, $71.7 million and ($43.2) million, respectively.

•

Social Networking. Approximately 69% and 70% of our total net revenues for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and the year ended December 31, 2010, respectively, were generated through our targeted social networking technology platform. Our social networking technology platform provides users who register or purchase subscriptions to one or more of our websites with the ability to communicate and to establish new connections with other users via our personal chat rooms, instant messaging and e-mail applications and to create, post and view content of interest. The content on our social networking sites is generated by our users for our users. Our social networking technology platform is extremely scalable and requires limited incremental cost to add additional users or to create new websites catering to additional unique audiences. As a result, we have been able to rapidly create and seamlessly maintain multiple websites tailored to specific categories or genres and designed to cater to targeted audiences with mutual interests. We believe that our ability to create and operate a diverse network of specific interest websites with unique, user-generated content in a cost-effective manner is a significant competitive differentiator that allows us to implement a subscription-fee based revenue model while many other popular social networking websites rely primarily upon free-access, advertising-based revenue models.

•

Live Interactive Video. Approximately 24% and 22% of our total net revenues for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and the year ended December 31, 2010, respectively, were generated through our live interactive video technology platform. Our live interactive video technology platform is a live video broadcast platform that enables models to broadcast from independent studios throughout the world and interact with our users via instant messaging and video. Users are charged on a per-minute basis to interact with models. We pay a percentage of the revenues we generate to the studios that employ the models. We believe our live interactive video platform provides a unique offering including bi-directional and omni-directional video and interactive features that allow models to communicate with and attract users through a variety of mediums including blogs, newsletters and video. As a result, many studios and their models prefer our platform given our audience size and international reach, and our users prefer our platform as a result of the quality and variety of our models, the reliability of our network and the diversity of interactive features our platform provides. In addition, we believe the reliability of our live interactive video technology platform, which had approximately 99.1% uptime during 2010, is a key factor allowing us to maintain a large base of users.

In addition to our revenue-generating technology platforms, we have invested significant time and resources into developing our back-end marketing, analytics and billing technologies. Our marketing, analytics and billing technologies are the result of more than seven years of development work and are a key contributor to the success of our business. During that time, we have developed proprietary systems to allow our marketing affiliates to

maximize their revenue for our mutual benefit. These systems include proprietary white-labeling solutions, in which we provide back-end technology solutions to permit affiliates and marketing partners to deliver our products and services while maintaining the affiliate’s and marketing partner’s own branding and style, self-optimizing ad spots, and a robust banner optimization engine that automatically chooses the best possible site and banner to promote in a given ad spot. Our marketing technology has also enabled the creation and continued growth of our network of more than 280,000 affiliates, which we believe is one of the largest of its kind in the world and a significant barrier to entry to potential and existing competitors. Similarly, our proprietary analytics technology provides us with an advantage relative to less sophisticated competitors by enabling us to estimate future revenue based on short-term response to our advertising campaigns, as well as providing for analysis of key data and metrics in order to optimize our marketing spend and maximize the revenues our websites generate. Our robust billing platform allows our customers to pay using many of the widely-adopted methods of e-commerce, both domestically as well as internationally. In addition, as a result of our size and technical sophistication, we can collect monies from regions and customers that other companies cannot, using payment methods that go beyond traditional credit card billing, like SMS billing.

We categorize our users into five categories: visitors, registrants, members, subscribers and paid users.

•

Visitors. Visitors are users who visit our websites but do not necessarily register. Visitors come to our websites through a number of channels, including by being directed from affiliate websites, keyword searches through standard search engines and by word of mouth. We believe we achieve large numbers of unique visitors because of our focus on continuously enhancing the user experience and expanding the breadth of our services. We had more than 196 million unique worldwide visitors in the month of December 2010, representing a growth of more than 300% from our approximately 46.9 million unique worldwide visitors in January 2009, according to comScore.

•

Registrants. Registrants are visitors who complete a free registration form on one of our websites by giving basic identification information and submitting their e-mail address. For the nine months ended September 30, 2011, we averaged more than 6.4 million new registrations on our websites each month. For the year ended December 31, 2010, we averaged more than 6.4 million new registrations on our websites each month. Some of our registrants are also members, as described below.

•

Members. Members are registrants who log into one of our websites and make use of our free products and services. Members are able to complete their personal profile and access our searchable database of members but do not have the same full-access rights as subscribers. For the nine months ended September 30, 2011, we averaged more than 4.0 million new members on our websites each month. For the year ended December 31, 2010, we averaged more than 3.9 million new members on our websites each month.

•

Subscribers. Subscribers are members who purchase daily, three-day, weekly, monthly, quarterly, annual or lifetime subscriptions for one or more of our websites. Subscribers have full access to our websites and may access special features. For the nine months ended September 30, 2011, we had a monthly average of approximately 950 thousand paying subscribers and for the year ended December 31, 2010, we had a monthly average of approximately 1 million paying subscribers, respectively.

•

Paid Users. Paid users are members who purchase products or services on a pay-by-usage basis. For the nine months ended September 30, 2011, we averaged approximately 2.9 million purchased minutes by paid users each month. For the year ended December 31, 2010, we averaged approximately 3.0 million purchased minutes by paid users each month.

We focus on the following key business metrics to evaluate the effectiveness of our operating strategies.

•

Average Revenue per Subscriber. We calculate average revenue per subscriber, or ARPU, by dividing net revenue for the period by the average number of subscribers in the period and by the number of months in the period. As such, our ARPU is a monthly calculation. For the nine months ended September 30, 2011, our average monthly revenue per subscriber was $20.22. For the year ended December 31, 2010, our average monthly revenue per subscriber was $20.49. For more information regarding our revenue, see the sections entitled “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations — Results of Operations — Nine Months Ended September 30, 2011 as Compared to the Nine Months Ended

September 30, 2010” and “ — Year Ended December 31, 2010 as Compared to the Year Ended December 31, 2009.”

•

Churn. Churn is calculated by dividing terminations of subscriptions during the period by the total number of subscribers at the beginning of that period. Our average monthly churn rate, which measures the rate of loss of subscribers, for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 was approximately 16.3%. Our average monthly churn rate for the year ended December 31, 2010 was 16.1% per month.

•

Cost Per Gross Addition. Cost per gross addition, or CPGA, is calculated by adding affiliate commission expense plus ad buy expenses and dividing by new subscribers during the measurement period. Our CPGA for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 was $42.76. Our CPGA for the year ended December 31, 2010 was $47.25.

•

Average Lifetime Net Revenue Per Subscriber. Average Lifetime Net Revenue Per Subscriber is calculated by multiplying the average lifetime (in months) of a subscriber by ARPU for the measurement period and then subtracting the CPGA for the measurement period. Our Average Lifetime Net Revenue Per Subscriber for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 was $81.06. Our Average Lifetime Net Revenue Per Subscriber for the year ended December 31, 2010 was $80.17. While we monitor many statistics in the overall management of our business, we believe that Average Lifetime Net Revenue Per Subscriber and the number of subscribers are particularly helpful metrics for gaining a meaningful understanding of our business as they provide an indication of total revenue and profit generated from our base of subscribers inclusive of affiliate commissions and advertising costs required to generate new subscriptions.

In addition to our social networks and live interactive video platforms, we also offer professionally-generated content through our premium content technology platform, and our non-internet entertainment business. Approximately 1.5% and 6.5% of our total net revenues for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and approximately 1.4% and 7.0% of our total net revenues for the year ended December 31, 2010 were generated via our premium content technology platform and our non-internet entertainment business, respectively. Through websites such as Penthouse.com and HotBox.com, our subscribers and paid users have access to our collection of more than 15,000 hours of professional video, which includes our library of more than 800 standard and high-definition full-length feature films and one million professionally produced images. We began shooting all of our content in 3D in September 2010. By the end of September 2011, we were producing more than 145 hours of content per month. Additionally, subscribers have access to editorial content, chat rooms and other interactive features. In addition to our online products and services, we also have a non-technology legacy entertainment business, in which we produce and distribute original pictorial and video content via traditional distribution channels including licensing and retail DVD channels, license the globally-recognized Penthouse brand to a variety of consumer product companies and entertainment venues and public branded men’s lifestyle magazines.

Our Competitive Strengths

We believe that we have the following competitive strengths that we can leverage to implement our strategy:

•

Proprietary and Scalable Technology Platform.

Our robust, proprietary and highly scalable technology platform supports our social networking, live interactive video and premium content websites. We are able to use our customized back-end interface to quickly and affordably generate new websites, launch new features and target new audiences at a relatively low incremental cost. Our technology platform enables us to rapidly redeploy the architecture underlying our websites with new appearances and themes in order to create additional websites for our users. We believe that our ability to create new websites and provide new features is crucial to cost-effectively maintaining our relationships with existing users and attracting new users. Furthermore, our technology platform has also enabled us to create and continue to expand our affiliate network and to measure and optimize the efficiency of our marketing spend, allowing us to expand the number of visitors to our site in an economical manner.

•

Paid Subscriber-Based Model.

We operate social networking websites that allow our members to make connections with other members with whom they share common interests. Our members are able to post their profiles and other content of interest for free and our subscribers are then able to access this content for a fee. Our paid subscriber-based model of social networking websites is distinctly different from the business models of other free social networking websites whose users access the websites to remain connected to their pre-existing friends and interest groups.

•

Large and Diverse User Base.

We operate some of the most heavily visited social networking websites in the world, currently adding on average more than 6.4 million new registrants and more than 4.0 million new members each month. Since our inception, more than 484 million registrants and more than 320 million members have registered on our websites, with a majority of our members outside of the United States. Our websites are designed to appeal to individuals with a diversity of interests and backgrounds. We believe potential members are attracted to the opportunity to interact with other individuals by having access to our large, diverse user base. We believe that our broad and diverse international user base also represents a valuable asset that will provide opportunities for us to offer targeted online advertising to specific demographic groups and represents a substantial barrier to entry for potential competitors.

•

Large and Difficult to Replicate Affiliate Network and Significant Marketing Spend.

Our marketing affiliates are companies that market our services on their websites, allowing us to market our brand beyond our established user base. These affiliates direct visitor traffic to our websites by using our technology to place banners or links on their websites to one or more of our websites for a fee. As of September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, we had more than 280,000 and 250,000 participants, respectively, in our marketing affiliate program from which we derive a substantial portion of our new members and approximately 46% of our net revenues for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 45% of our net revenues for the year ended December 31, 2010. For the nine months ended September 30, 2011, we made payments to marketing affiliates of approximately $47.9 million, a large portion of which was on a revenue share basis with the Company, as opposed to a pay-per-order basis. In addition, we spent $16.6 million on ad buy expenses during the same time period. We believe that the difficulty in building an affiliate network of this large size, together with our combined affiliate and advertising spend of approximately $64.5 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2011, presents a significant barrier to entry for potential competitors.

Our Strategy

Our goal is to enhance revenue opportunities while improving our profitability. We plan to achieve these goals using the following strategies:

•

Convert Visitors, Registrants and Members into Subscribers or Paid Users.

We continually seek to convert visitors, registrants and members into subscribers or paid users. We do this by constantly evaluating, adding and enhancing features on our websites to improve our users’ experience. We also dynamically adjust offers and pricing to users based on a variety of factors such as geography, currency, payment system, country of origin, time of day or calendar date in order to encourage users to become subscribers or paid users.

•

Create Additional Websites and Diversify Offerings.

We are constantly seeking to identify groups of sufficient size who share a common interest in order to create a website intended to appeal to their interests. Our technology provides us with a scalable, low-cost capacity to quickly create and launch additional websites, such as new social networking websites, content-driven websites that serve as portals for user-generated and professional content and

complementary FriendFinder branded websites, without substantial additional capital investment. Our extensive user database serves as an existing source of potential members and subscribers for new websites we create.

•

Expand into and Monetize Current Foreign Markets.

In 2010, nearly 71% of our members were outside the United States, but non-U.S. users accounted for less than half of our total net revenues. We seek to expand in selected geographic markets, including Southeast Europe, South America and Asia. Our geographic expansion, in conjunction with growth in alternative payment mechanisms — including credit card and non-credit card payments, such as pre-authorized debiting and mobile phone payments — in our targeted geographic areas should allow us to significantly increase our revenue and EBITDA.

•

Pursue Targeted Acquisitions.

We intend to expand our business by acquiring and integrating additional social networking websites, technology platforms, owners, creators and distributors of content and payment processing and advertising businesses. Our management team possesses significant mergers and acquisitions and integration expertise and regularly screens the marketplace for strategic acquisition opportunities.

•

Generate Online Advertising Revenue.

To date, online advertising revenue has represented less than 0.1% of our net revenue, averaging approximately $8,000 per month during the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and $9,000 per month for the year ended December 31, 2010. With continued worldwide growth in this advertising segment, we see this as a significant growth opportunity. We believe that our broad and diverse user base represents a valuable asset that will provide opportunities for us to offer targeted online advertising to specific demographic groups. We believe we will be able to offer advertisers an opportunity to achieve superior results with advertisements that are well-targeted to their preferred demographic and interest groups. We intend to focus our advertising efforts on our general audience social networking websites and maintain our subscription-based model for our adult social networking websites.

Our Products and Services

Our products and services consist of our social networking, live interactive video and premium content websites and, to a lesser extent, the licensing of our Penthouse brand, the publishing of branded men’s lifestyle magazines and the production and distribution of original video and pictorial content. For a discussion of our financial information for specific geographic areas, see “Note O — Segment Information” in our consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this prospectus.

Social Networking Websites

The social networking aspect of our business is a cornerstone of our business model and is our largest source of revenue. We believe we are a leading provider of social networking websites in the world. In December 2010, our websites were ranked in the top 15 most-visited websites in the world by comScore. These websites accounted for 67.6% and 69.5% of our net revenue in the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and for the year ended December 31, 2010, respectively.

We provide social networking and online personals services for members of diverse cultures, ethnicities and interest groups. Each website is built around a central theme, which often relates to the ethnicity or social interests of its members. These online communities are delivered in the language appropriate to the group targeted by the website, including:

• English	• German	• Portuguese
• Chinese	• Italian	• Spanish
• Dutch	• Japanese	• Swedish
• French	• Korean	• Tagalog

Membership on our social networking websites generally includes access to member-generated content including the ability to post a personal profile and photographs, create a social network, chat and instant message with other members, and search our database of member profiles as well as company-generated features and content such as contests, newsletters and articles as well as the loyalty program we administer. We believe that this variety of revenue-enhancing features encourages visitors to join as members. The ability to initiate communication with other members and subscribers via our e-mail communications platform and view the full profiles of the members in our database requires payment of a subscription fee. Depending on the specific website, subscribers also have access to additional functionality and increased or enhanced levels of services and content. Described below are several of the features that are accessible on many of our websites.

•

Blogs — Blogs are a simple way to create a regularly updated home page where members can express themselves, learn about others, get more noticed and attract new friends. There are numerous blogs, grouped by subject.

•

Chatrooms — Chatrooms are areas where members can discuss a specific topic or join rooms established by region. A private chatroom lets a member host a chat party by invitation only.

•

Contests — Contests are a means of engaging our members by offering rewards for member-generated content. Examples include Best Holiday Greeting Card, Silly Photos with Clever Captions and many more. Prizes include upgraded memberships, free points, DVDs, T-shirts and mugs.

•

Cupid Reports — Once a member has described an ideal match, the member is automatically notified by e-mail when a person matching that description becomes a member.

•

Friends Network — A member can invite specified members into a personal group, keep track of them, share private photos and send personalized bulletins.

•

Get Local — Websites list local events that are geographically targeted according to a member’s location.

•

Groups — Groups are the place to find people who share interests and to develop new friendships. Members search for groups by topics, names or keywords and correspond, exchanging ideas. All groups have their own discussion boards and chatrooms, which facilitate communication and relationship building. Popular groups include “Single again? Let’s get together!,” “Dancing” and “Adventures, Romantic Getaways.”

•

Instant Messaging — Two different types of our instant messaging system are available: a standard service and a faster Flash system, which offers extra options such as live video and sound.

•

Loyalty Program — Our point based loyalty program is designed to increase participation in our websites membership activities, such as participating in blogs and online magazines and creating video introductions as members are awarded points for participating in these activities. Points can be redeemed for other membership services such as upgraded memberships or more prominence of member profiles in online searches.

•

Newsletters — Our most popular websites periodically send newsletters to members, including photos and brief descriptions of other members, advice on enhancing one’s profile to attract more responses from other members and practical tips on dating and relationships.

•

Online Magazine — At magazine pages, members can participate in many ways: read articles with expert advice on dating and relationships, enjoy fiction serials, submit their own articles, vote and comment on their reading, post original polls they have created, give advice and exchange opinions on various subjects, and view archives of articles.

•

Photo, Video and Voice Sharing — Members can post their photographs and create webcam video introductions and voice introductions of themselves, which generates member-to-member contact.

•

Posting Profiles — Members include personal details, such as city of residence and birthday, physical information, such as height and hair color, personal information, such as education, and occupation as well as other information. They describe themselves, specifying hobbies, the type of person they are

seeking for a friend or for dating and can present up to 20 photographs. Members are encouraged to make their profiles as unique as possible by including personal details.

•

Search — Members can conduct searches for compatible members according to a substantial list of criteria, including gender, geographical proximity, availability of photos and interests. Search criteria can be saved for repeated use.

Website Data

Below is a list of each of our websites that had more than 100,000 registrants since its inception as of September 30, 2011. As of the nine months ended September 30, 2011, we had approximately 900 thousand subscribers.

Website	Description
AdultFriendFinder.com	Our most popular adult social networking and dating website.	261,043
Amigos.com	Spanish version of FriendFinder.com, translated into Spanish, Portuguese and English.	58,137
Cams.com	Adult content live interactive video website where members pay per minute to chat with models who broadcast on the website via their webcams.	47,910
AsiaFriendFinder.com	Chinese version of FriendFinder.com, features traditional and simplified Chinese character sets as well as an English interface.	45,793
FriendFinder.com	Website targeted toward singles looking for love, romance and marriage. Also includes many social networking aspects.	17,666
ALT.com	Alternative lifestyle personals website, catering to users with fetish, role-playing and other alternative sexuality interests.	16,343
GetItOn.com	Adult social networking and personals website where members from around the world log on to chat and view each other via their webcams.	14,641
OutPersonals.com	Adult-oriented dating website for gay men.	8,080
Penthouse.com	Premium content-based website with varying levels of access to Penthouse pictorials, articles, videos and live webcams shows with Penthouse Pets.	4,935
GradFinder.com	Alumni directory where members can contact friends from elementary school through college.	3,453
IndianFriendFinder.com	Indian version of FriendFinder.com, where users can narrow their searches by specific criteria, including language, religion, diet, and caste.	3,395
BigChurch.com	Christian dating website with searchable bible passages and daily bible chapter e-mails.	2,578
SeniorFriendFinder.com	Website targeted toward people over 40 years of age.	2,420
FrenchFriendFinder.com	French version of FriendFinder.com, translated into French and English.	2,069
FilipinoFriendFinder.com	Filipino version of FriendFinder.com, translated into Tagalog and English.	2,049
GermanFriendFinder.com	German version of FriendFinder.com, translated into German and English.	1,494

Website	Description
NoStringsAttached.com	Adult Discreet Relationship Site	1,481
FastCupid.com	Social networking and personals website for dating, romance and friendship.	1,343
Bondage.com	World’s largest BDSM community	1,274
GayFriendFinder.com	Dating website for gay men.	1,255
ItalianFriendFinder.com	Italian version of FriendFinder.com, translated into Italian and English.	1,176
KoreanFriendFinder.com	Korean version of FriendFinder.com, translated into Korean and English.	1,066
Millionairemate.com	Dating website targeted toward like-minded people who understand that intelligence, success and drive are key elements to attraction.	964
stripshow.com	Low cost cams site which offers group viewing	818
JewishFriendFinder.com	Jewish dating website.	640
icams.com	Cams site dedicated to amateur videos	499
AllPersonals.com	Allows users to join multiple top personal sites at one time	301
Slim.com	Health and wellness website.	148
HotBox.com	Premium content-based website that allows members to search a database of adult movies by favorite actor or by category of movie.	119

Internet Privacy

Our privacy principles represent the continuing evolution of our long-standing commitment to consumer privacy. Our privacy principles related to our internet websites and services provide for consumer notice, choice and data security. Our privacy principles include:

•

Notice. Users are provided meaningful notice about the information collected and used for internet related advertising. Users visiting our websites are provided notice via links to our privacy policies usually located on every one of our web pages and other methods of the types of individual information collected for advertising purposes, the technologies employed to collect such information, and how such information is used, including if applicable that other companies operate on the website and may collect such information.

•

Choice. Users are provided with a choice on how certain information is used. We provide for an opt-out mechanism for e-mail advertising and members of our social networking websites have access to a control panel that allows them to make choices on the type of data that is stored on our servers or made available to the public or other members using our websites.

•

Security. We strive to provide reasonable security for consumer data. Our security methods are based on the sensitivity of the data, the nature of the services provided, the types of risks related to such data and the reasonable protections available to us for practical implementation. We require our business service providers, such as credit card processors, to contractually maintain appropriate information security procedures based upon the sensitivity of the data and industry practices. We also ask registrants and members to provide their age and we review all member-generated content prior to its appearing on our websites.

•

Responsiveness. Users have a readily accessible means to contact us to express concerns and complaints regarding privacy matters and we have a team associated with handling such concerns and complaints.

Most of our web pages have a link directly to a web based form for providing complaints to us for processing.

Live Interactive Video Websites

Our live interactive video websites, such as Cams.com, are a broadcast platform that enables models with a camera and a broadband internet connection to broadcast to an audience of users of any size. These websites represented approximately 27.3% of our net revenue for the nine months ended September 30, 2011. On these websites we offer an interactive webcam service where users can contact models, visually see them and communicate via on-screen text messaging or via webcam to webcam. The models broadcast from independent studios throughout the world to a group of our users. The models interact with a group of users until an individual user requests a private one-on-one experience at which time the per-minute usage charge begins and the screen is blocked to all but the user who is being charged. In some cases, other users are permitted to view the private session for a fee but not interact with the model. In addition to the pay-by-usage service, we offer subscription-based payment options that provide discounts on the pay-per-usage services. The majority of the revenues we generate from these websites are from users who may not be subscribers but provide a credit card for payment under the pay-by-usage plan. For the nine months ended September 30, 2011, we paid approximately 31% of the revenues derived from these websites to the studios that employ the models.

Premium Content Websites

We operate a number of websites with premium content, such as Penthouse.com and HotBox.com. These websites represented approximately 1.5% of our net revenue in the nine months ended September 30, 2011. Premium content is professionally-generated content as opposed to member-generated content. These websites provide subscribers and paid users access to our collection of more than 15,000 hours of professional video, which includes our library of more than 800 standard and high-definition full-length feature films. Our subscribers also have access to our collection of over one million professionally produced images. Additionally, subscribers have access to editorial content, chat rooms and other interactive features.

We believe that we are one of the few companies that produce high quality, high definition video productions available on the internet. In 2010, we averaged 75 high definition productions per calendar quarter using a combination of freelance and contract directors. Our programming is available on television in the United States, Latin America, Europe and Asia.

We derive revenue through third party license agreements for the distribution of our programming in which we may receive a percentage of the subscription fee paid by the customer, a percentage of the single program or title fee purchased by the customer, a fixed fee for the licensed program, or a combination of the above. Our fixed fee contracts may receive a fixed amount of revenue per title, group of titles or for a certain amount of programming during a period of time. Our studio group also realizes revenue through the sale of DVDs. We sell our productions in the retail DVD marketplace through distribution outlets that make DVDs available to retail outlets, internet stores, and mail order. We release an average of one new DVD title every week to the retail marketplace.

Technology Platform

We have developed a robust, highly scalable technology platform over the last ten years, which is supported by approximately 182 architects, programmers and designers as of September 30, 2011. Our proprietary technology platform operates on more than 2,000 internal network and storage devices and allows us to add new registrants and members and additional websites at a very low incremental cost. In addition, we have developed a wide array of technologies to support our affiliate program, our billing processes, content management and translation and for business analytics.

Our technology platform allows us to collect and sort a variety of data which permits us to monitor all areas of our business and increase the traffic and revenue to our websites. We collect and evaluate information related to the activity of the users on our websites, the nature of our users and the processing of information on our servers.

The data we collect concerning our users’ activities on our websites includes:

The data we collect concerning the nature of our users includes:

• referring link/domain				• referring affiliate/ad buy/traffic source
• country				• language
• gender				• email domain

Statistics monitored on a per-server basis include:

• number of requests served				• time spent per request
• central processing unit utilization				• memory utilization
• disc utilization

We have developed a substantial portfolio of technology-related intellectual property assets. Almost every aspect of our technology, including software code and network architecture, is developed in-house and designed to help optimize our website performance. For example, our content management system enables translation of our websites into a dozen languages or rebranding to address certain target or niche audiences, and our billing software quickly allows the addition of new billing sources.

With respect to marketing technologies, our in-house monitoring systems provide analytical tools during every stage of the “sales funnel” and help us to react quickly to changes in user or potential member behavior. Sophisticated live A-B testing in which we run controlled blind tests in different control groups enables us to determine how a website design element affects our business.

Finally, our in-house developed and maintained software also allows us to provide our third-party advertisers and affiliates with near real-time statistics so that they can monitor their performance and quickly make necessary adjustments. Similarly, we can provide these advertisers with a variety of improved business models based upon the efficiency of their traffic source.

Licensing of Penthouse Brand

We license the Penthouse name, logos, trademarks and artwork for the manufacture, sale and distribution of consumer products. Licensing represented approximately 0.7% of our net revenue in the nine months ended September 30, 2011. We work with our U.S. and international licensees to develop, market and distribute Penthouse-branded products, including books, apparel, accessories, lingerie, shoes and novelties. We have eight international editions of Penthouse magazine and its associated magazines and digests available in 13 countries. We continually seek to expand our licenses and products in new markets and retail categories both domestically and internationally.

We also license our Penthouse brand to 13 upscale gentlemen’s clubs and nightclubs. We actively seek to expand our location-based entertainment business, and we are in negotiations on a number of other locations in the United States, Europe and Asia. Our licensing arrangements require limited capital investment or expense on our part.

Magazine Publishing

Penthouse magazine and its related publications are our branded men’s lifestyle publications offering a combination of pictorials, editorial content and humor. We also publish several other adult-oriented magazines and digests. Magazine Publishing represented approximately 3.0% of our net revenue in the nine months ended September 30, 2011. We believe that Penthouse magazine plays a key role in driving the continued popularity and recognition of the Penthouse brand. Accordingly, in the past few years we made significant changes to Penthouse magazine in order to appeal to a wider customer base. We softened the magazine’s pictorial content to improve newsstand positioning and attract a wider national advertising base, and we added editorial content covering sports, music, video and gaming in order to attract additional categories of advertisers and new readers, primarily targeting

21 to 39 year old males. This resulted in the magazine re-entering sales channels in retail establishments. Our advertising base has expanded to now include tobacco, liquor, apparel, footwear, toiletries, men’s grooming, consumer products and direct-response companies.

Broadcasting

We produce professionally generated original adult video and pictorial content in high-definition and standard definition formats, which in addition to providing superior quality resolution on our websites, gives us the flexibility to convert the content into different media and market it through a wide range of broadcast distribution channels including cable, satellite, internet protocol television, or IPTV, DVDs and mobile devices. Broadcasting accounted for 2.9% of our net revenue in the nine months ended September 30, 2011. We operate three high-definition channels by satellite serving Europe and the Middle East. These channels are also available via terrestrial cable and IPTV.

Payment for Our Internet Products and Services

We derive our revenue primarily from subscriptions. Our users can purchase daily, three-day, weekly, monthly, quarterly, annual or lifetime subscriptions that give them access to all members’ full profile information and the ability to contact other members in one-on-one e-mail correspondence. During the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, our monthly ARPU across our subscriber base was $20.49 and $20.55, respectively. Monthly subscription fees and ARPU tend to be lower on our non-adult-oriented or general interest websites. All subscriptions are charged in advance and we recognize the revenue over the terms of such subscriptions. Subscribers on a majority of our websites can upgrade their subscription level for an additional cost in order to have access to additional features and content. On average, our subscribers maintain their subscriptions for approximately six months.

On our live interactive video websites, our users are primarily paid users who purchase products and services on a pay-by-usage basis, and some users pay a monthly fee for access to the websites. During the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, these websites averaged a usage fee of $3.90 and $3.49 per minute, respectively, and ranged from $0.99 to as high as $9.99 per minute, as determined by the studio producing the video. The paid users purchase minutes in advance of their use and draw down on the available funds as the minutes are used.

Our internet-based business does not carry customer receivables on the balance sheet since our products and services are paid for in advance. Subscribers pay for products and services on our websites using several payment methods including credit card and non-credit card payments, such as preauthorized bank account debiting, regular bank transfers, e-money and mobile phone payments. As of September 30, 2011, credit card payments represented approximately 94.6% of our total payments while other payment methods represented 5.4% of our total payments, which we consider to present a significant opportunity for growth. We have maintained long-standing relationships with merchant banks and have more than 20 merchant bank accounts. Our technology platform includes proprietary anti-fraud measures to protect us against unauthorized use of credit cards and fraudulent activity on our websites. As a result, at September 30, 2011, our credit card chargeback rate was approximately 0.9% of the transactions processed and the reserves the banks require us to maintain approximately 2.0% of our total net revenues.

Internet Product and Feature Development

We believe we are at the leading-edge of creating, implementing and commercializing advanced features and product enhancements to our websites. We continually evaluate and add features to our websites to improve our users’ experience. New features and designs are tested on a statistically significant sample of our user base, and features and designs are released to the entire user base only after satisfactory results are achieved. We believe the release of new features and designs results in new registrants and members, increased member loyalty, the purchase of additional services on our websites, and increased visitation and utilization of our other websites and services.

Marketing

Our marketing primarily consists of our marketing affiliates program and online advertising.

Marketing Affiliates Program

Our marketing affiliates are companies that operate websites that market our services on their websites. Our affiliates’ websites cover a wide range of content and interests. Our affiliates direct visitor traffic to our websites

by using our technology to place banners or links on their websites to one or more of our websites. When a visitor to an affiliate’s website clicks on the banner or link, the visitor will be directed to one of our websites. In addition, we maintain more than 47,000 private label websites for our affiliates that provide a seamless, turnkey outsourced solution using our technology platform for social networking and live interactive video websites. Many of these websites have the look and feel of the affiliate’s website with the affiliate’s logo and website name but are operated by us. Users who click through the affiliate’s website are tagged with the affiliate’s identifier that tracks the user to calculate the payment due to the affiliate. Private labeling allows our affiliates to preserve their brand while generating revenue for us. Generally our websites have different programs from which our affiliates may derive revenue.

Our affiliates may derive revenue based on:

•

a percentage of revenue generated and collected;

•

per registrant or member; and

•

per subscriber.

With more than 280,000 participants registered in our affiliate marketing program, we believe our affiliate network is one of the largest in the world and one of the highest paying programs in the industry. We do not typically have exclusive arrangements with our affiliates and some of our affiliates may also be affiliates for our competitors. We provide our affiliates with daily updated statistics, bi-monthly payments and technical support. Our affiliates are required to comply with a strict code of conduct, including a strict prohibition on spam and spyware and mandated compliance with our regulatory restrictions. We believe that as a result of these policies, the quality of our visitor traffic is enhanced.

Online Advertising

Another method we use for marketing our websites is by purchasing prepaid advertising, or ad buys, which consists primarily of pay-per-click keyword advertising on major search engines and advertising on third party websites via banner advertisements and ad networks. Through the use of our technology, we analyze returns and estimate the long-term revenue that a particular advertising program will generate after only a few days of monitoring traffic. This allows us to test different text, formats, placements and graphics relating to marketing programs on a cost effective basis, where we are able to analyze activity, estimate results and quickly and efficiently make changes to the program if necessary.

FriendFinder Ventures Inc.

Our subsidiary FriendFinder Ventures Inc., a startup entity formed in December 2010, focuses on strategic relationships and investment opportunities in online, gaming, mobile and software based companies. In addition to pursuing investment opportunities, FriendFinder Ventures Inc. also focuses on entering into strategic relationships and offering its expertise to companies ranging from those already in operation to new start ups in the areas of revenue enhancement, technology and infrastructure, user experience, recruiting and exploring financial opportunities. No investments have been made to date by FriendFinder Ventures Inc.

Competition

As an internet-based social networking and multimedia entertainment company we operate in several submarkets within a highly competitive but fragmented industry. We compete with a number of large and small companies that provide a range of internet products and services including adult-oriented communities and adult content websites, general audience communities and internet personals websites. We believe that the primary competitive factors in social networking and online communities are functionality, brand recognition, member affinity and loyalty, ease-of-use, quality of service, reliability and critical mass. We believe the primary competitive factors in our entertainment segment is brand recognition, video and pictorial content. While our management does not believe there is another company with whom we compete across all the areas of our business, we tend to compete with companies in four categories, with some overlap among these categories:

•

Social Networking Websites — Unlike most other social networking websites which are free, we have a paid subscription-based business model, which we believe is a significant competitive advantage. Our

adult-themed community websites from which the majority of our revenue and earnings are derived, including AdultFriendFinder.com, do not directly compete with other general interest social networking websites because of the adult nature of the content. Our general audience websites, which contribute substantially less of our revenue and earnings, compete with other companies offering social networking websites such as MySpace, Inc., Facebook, Inc. and Friendster, Inc. Our general audience websites provide a wide range of social networking tools including blogs, chatrooms and messaging similar to our competitors. We also believe that a significant advantage to our websites is the ease with which members meet other members who were not known to them prior to joining our network.

•

Internet Personals Websites — We compete with certain elements of the internet personals business provided by companies including Match.com, L.L.C., Yahoo!Personals, a website owned and operated by Yahoo! Inc., Windows Live Profile, run by Microsoft Corporation, eHarmony, Inc., Lavalife Corp., Plentyoffish Media Inc. and Spark Networks Limited websites, including jdate.com, americansingles.com and relationships.com, as well as companies offering adult-oriented internet personals websites such as Cytek Ltd., the operator of SexSearch.com, and Fling Incorporated.

•

Adult Audience Websites — We compete with many adult-oriented and live interactive video websites, such as RedTube.com, Pornhub.com, YouPorn.com, Playboy.com and LiveJasmin.com. These websites are largely distinguished by the quality of the video and the quantity and caliber of the video content. We continue to seek to be at the forefront of video technology by seeking to offer our users the best available experience. As adult content receives wider mainstream acceptance, we expect our websites to benefit from an increased volume of member-generated content that will enhance our large library of adult content which is frequently updated and refreshed.

•

Adult Entertainment Providers — We compete with other publishers of branded men’s lifestyle magazines, such as Maxim and Playboy, and we compete with other producers of adult pictorial and video content, such as Playboy Enterprises Inc., tmc Content Group AG and Total Media Agency.

Intellectual Property

Our Penthouse mark has been in use since 1965 and is a globally recognized brand in the adult entertainment industry. Through continuous and widespread use, we have developed strong trademark rights or brand recognition in numerous trademarks, including Penthouse Forum, Penthouse Variations, Penthouse Letters, the One Key Logo and Three Key Logo, Pet Of The Year, Pet Of The Month and Penthouse Pet, as well as the AdultFriendFinder, FriendFinder, ALT.com, Bondage.com, OutPersonals.com and FriendFinder trademarks used in our internet social networking and online personals business. We have developed the “FriendFinder” service mark and its many variations, including AdultFriendFinder, SeniorFriendFinder, FrenchFriendFinder, Asia FriendFinder and India FriendFinder.

We currently own and maintain approximately 100 U.S. trademark registrations and applications and more than 950 foreign trademark registrations and applications. We have generated very large volumes of written, visual and audiovisual content, including over one million photographic images. We own and maintain hundreds of U.S. copyright registrations covering our magazines and videos. As our intellectual property assets are one of the keys to our continued growth and success, we enforce our rights against infringers as is reasonably prudent. We regularly evaluate and grant requests to license our brands and content and participate in other commercial ventures by contributing trademark and content licenses.

We devote substantial resources to the establishment, protection and enforcement of our trademarks and other proprietary rights. However, our actions to establish, protect and enforce our trademarks and other proprietary rights may not prevent imitation of our products, services or brands or control piracy by others or prevent others from claiming violations of their trademarks and other proprietary rights by us. There are factors outside of our control that pose a threat to our intellectual property rights. For example, effective intellectual property protection may not be available in every country in which our products and services are distributed or made available through the internet. We are, from time to time, subject to claims of infringement of third party patents and trademarks and other violations of third party intellectual property rights. Any infringement or related claims, even if not meritorious, may be costly and time-consuming to litigate, may distract our management from other tasks of

operating the business and may result in the loss of significant financial and managerial resources, which could harm our business, financial condition or operating results. If we are not successful in defending against such claims, our financial condition or operating results would be materially adversely affected.

Successful claims against us could also result in us having to seek a license to continue our practices, which may significantly increase our operating burden and expenses, potentially resulting in a negative effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations and such license may not be offered to us at all, which could severely restrict or hinder our business and impact the value of our business.

Employees

As of September 30, 2011, we had approximately 524 full-time employees and six part-time employees, none of whom is represented by a collective bargaining agreement. We believe we maintain a satisfactory relationship with our employees.

Properties

Our headquarters are in Boca Raton, Florida. As of September 30, 2011, our principal offices consisted of the following properties:

Location/Principal Use		Lease Expiration Date
Sunnyvale, California — internet	50,112	October 31, 2015
Los Angeles, California — entertainment	35,400	April 30, 2014
New York, New York — entertainment	16,431	January 31, 2019
Boca Raton, Florida — corporate administrative offices	8,533	December 31, 2015
Las Vegas, Nevada — internet	6,976	December 31, 2012

We believe that our properties are in good operating condition and adequately serve our current business operations. We also anticipate that suitable additional or alternative space, including those under lease options, will be available at commercially reasonable terms for future expansion.

Government Regulation

We are subject to a number of foreign and domestic laws that affect companies conducting business on the internet. In addition, laws relating to user privacy, freedom of expression, content, advertising, information security, internet obscenity and intellectual property rights are being considered for adoption by many countries throughout the world. We face risks from some of this proposed legislation that could be passed in the future.

In the United States, laws relating to the liability of providers of online services for activities of their users and other third parties are currently being tested by a number of claims, which include actions for libel, slander, invasion of privacy and other tort claims, unlawful activity, copyright and trademark infringement and other theories based on the nature and content of the materials searched, the ads posted or the content generated by users. Certain foreign jurisdictions are also testing the liability of providers of online services for activities of their users and other third parties. Any court ruling that imposes liability on providers of online services for activities of their users and other third parties could expose us to liability.

A range of other laws and new interpretations of existing laws could have an impact on our business. For example, the Digital Millennium Copyright Act has provisions that limit, but do not necessarily eliminate, our liability for listing, linking or hosting third-party content that includes materials that infringe copyrights. Portions of the Communications Decency Act are intended to provide statutory protections to online service providers who distribute third-party content. We rely on the protections provided by both the Digital Millennium Copyright Act and Communications Decency Act in conducting our business. Any changes in these laws or judicial interpretations narrowing their protections will subject us to greater risk of liability and may increase our costs of compliance with these laws or limit our ability to operate certain lines of business. The Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act restricts the ability of online services to collect information from children under 13. In the area of data protection, many states have passed laws requiring notification to users when there is a security breach for personal data, such as California’s Information Practices Act. The costs of compliance with these laws may increase in the future as

interpretations change. Furthermore, any failure on our part to comply with these laws may subject us to significant liabilities.

Similarly, the application of existing laws prohibiting, regulating or requiring licenses for certain businesses of our advertisers, including, for example, online gambling, distribution of pharmaceuticals, adult content, financial services, alcohol or firearms, can be unclear. Application of these laws in an unanticipated manner could expose us to substantial liability and restrict our ability to deliver services to our users.

We also face risks related to investigations and prosecutions involving our adult content. Current or future government officials may choose to increase enforcement of obscenity laws and government officials could also change or interpret current laws in a manner that is unfavorable to our business. U.S. government officials could amend or construe and seek to enforce more broadly or aggressively the adult content recordkeeping and labeling requirements set forth in 18 U.S.C. Section 2257 and its implementing regulations in a manner that is unfavorable to our business. In addition, court rulings may place additional restrictions on adult content affecting how people interact on the internet, such as mandatory web labeling.

We also face risks relating to government failure to preserve the internet’s basic neutrality as to the services and websites that users can access through their broadband service providers, as governments can arbitrarily choose to block websites. Such a failure to enforce network neutrality could limit the internet’s pace of innovation and the ability of large competitors, small businesses and entrepreneurs to develop and deliver new products, features and services, which could harm our business.

We are also subject to federal, state and foreign laws regarding privacy and protection of user data. We post on our website our privacy policies and practices concerning the use and disclosure of user data. Any failure by us to comply with our posted privacy policies or privacy-related laws and regulations could result in proceedings against us by governmental authorities or others, which could potentially harm our business. In addition, the interpretation of data protection laws, and their application to the internet, in the United States, Europe and other foreign jurisdictions is unclear and in a state of flux. There is a risk that these laws may be interpreted and applied in conflicting ways from country to country and in a manner that is not consistent with our current data protection practices. Complying with these varying international requirements could cause us to incur additional costs and change our business practices. Further, any failure by us to protect our users’ privacy and data could result in a loss of user confidence in our services and ultimately in a loss of users, which could adversely affect our business.

In addition, because our services are accessible worldwide, certain foreign jurisdictions may claim that we are required to comply with their laws, even where we have no local entity, employees or infrastructure.

Legal Proceedings

We are currently a party to several legal proceedings, including the ones discussed below. Management presently believes that the ultimate outcome of these pending proceedings will be favorable to us. However, litigation is subject to inherent uncertainties and unfavorable rulings could occur. An unfavorable ruling could include monetary damages or, in cases for which injunctive relief is sought, an injunction prohibiting us from selling one or more services or conducting enjoined activities. Were an unfavorable ruling to occur, there exists the possibility of a material adverse impact on the business or results of operations for the period in which the ruling occurs or future periods.

On December 28, 2007, Broadstream Capital Partners, Inc., or Broadstream, filed a lawsuit against us in the State Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles, Central District, and we subsequently removed the case to the Federal District Court for the Central District of California. The complaint alleged, among other matters, breach of contract, breach of covenant of good faith and fair dealing, breach of fiduciary duty and constructive fraud arising out of a document entitled “Non-Disclosure Agreement”. The complaint sought, among other things, that Broadstream entered into a Non-Disclosure Agreement with us that required Broadstream’s prior written consent for us to knowingly acquire Various or any of its subsidiaries and that such consent was not obtained. The complaint sought damages which Broadstream alleged to be in excess of $20.0 million, plus interest, costs and punitive damages. Broadstream later asserted up to $557.0 million in damages plus punitive damages. On July 20, 2009, we entered into an agreement with Broadstream under which, without admitting liability and in addition to paying

Broadstream $3.0 million dollars, after January 20, 2011, but no later than January 20, 2012, Broadstream had to choose either to (i) refile its complaint in Federal District Court provided that it first repay us the $3.0 million or (ii) demand arbitration. If Broadstream were to elect arbitration, the parties agreed that there would be an arbitration award to Broadstream of at least $10.0 million but not more than $47.0 million. In December 2010, Broadstream elected arbitration and as a result, we recognized a loss in connection with the matter of $13.0 million as of December 31, 2010. The mediation was held on April 14, 2011 and resulted in an impasse. On July 6, 2011, we entered into a settlement agreement with Broadstream that obligates us to pay Broadstream a total of $15 million, in three installments of $8.0 million, $5.0 million and $2.0 million, the first two of which were due on July 13, 2011 and September 29, 2011 and have been paid and the third of which is due on January 2, 2012.

On December 23, 2005, Robert Guccione, our former president, filed an action against us and some of our current officers, among other defendants, in New York State Court for breach of contract, fraud, unjust enrichment, promissory estoppel, failure to pay severance and conspiracy to defraud. The amount of damages requested in the complaint against us is approximately $9.0 million and against the officers is in excess of $10.0 million. Some of the counts in the complaint also demand an unspecified amount of damages. Mr. Guccione filed an amended complaint on June 5, 2007 to include additional claims relating to ownership of certain United Kingdom, Jersey and Guernsey trademarks and added Penthouse Publications Limited, an entity with no current affiliation with us, as party plaintiff. Mr. Guccione agreed to dismiss the count for conspiracy to defraud only. Mr. Guccione filed a second amended complaint on December 14, 2007 adding General Media International, Inc., an entity with no current affiliation with us, as party plaintiff and a new claim for inducement to breach a contract. We filed our motion to dismiss the second amended complaint on January 31, 2008, which was granted in part and denied in part. The court dismissed the claims for unjust enrichment and promissory estoppel. On August 14, 2008, Mr. Guccione filed a voluntary petition for Chapter 7 bankruptcy. Mr. Guccione filed a dismissal of the bankruptcy proceedings on November 4, 2009. The Court dismissed the bankruptcy action on November 9, 2009. The settlement agreement between Mr. Guccione and his judgment creditors assigns all rights to the New York state court action to his judgment creditors. The New York state court action has now resumed. On January 8, 2010, we filed an amended answer with counterclaims against Guccione and Penthouse Publications Limited for conversion, breach of fiduciary duty, declaratory relief and indemnification. No specific amount of damages has been requested in the counterclaims. In January and February 2010, certain defendants filed their answers to Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint with cross claims against us for contribution and indemnification. No specific amount of damages has been requested. We filed answers and affirmative defenses to the cross-claims in February and March 2010. Mediation was set for November 2010; however, Mr. Guccione passed away in October 2010. On November 1, 2011, the Court substituted the personal representative of the Estate of Robert Guccione as the Plaintiff. On November 14, 2011, the Court ordered the parties to attend a status conference on January 18, 2012 and to participate in mediation before January 31, 2012. We and our officers believe that we have meritorious defenses to all claims and intend to vigorously defend the lawsuit and prosecute the counterclaims.

On November 28, 2006, Antor Media Corporation, or Antor, filed a complaint against us, our subsidiary, General Media Communications, Inc., and several non-affiliate media/entertainment defendants in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Texarkana Division, alleging infringement of U.S. Patent No. 5,734,961 entitled “Method and Apparatus for Transmitting Information Recorded on Information Storage Means from a Central Server to Subscribers via a High Data Rate Digital Telecommunications Network.” No specific amount of damages has been requested, and injunctive relief was sought. We and our subsidiary filed an answer, affirmative defenses and counterclaims. In a separate patent reexamination proceeding before the United States Patent and Trademark Office (“USPTO”) that was filed by third parties sued by Antor, the USPTO issued a non-final office action rejecting Antor’s patent claims. Antor filed a response to the office action which added 83 new claims to the original 29 rejected claims. In August 2008, the USPTO issued its final office action, sustaining the rejection of Plaintiff’s original 29 claims and rejecting the 83 new claims. Antor filed its Petition to Vacate Finality of Office Action, on the grounds it introduced new grounds of rejection. Based on the final office action in the reexamination proceeding, we filed an expedited motion to stay the lawsuit. In December 2008, pursuant to an order granting a second reexamination proceeding filed by a third party, the USPTO issued a non- final office action again rejecting the original 29 claims of the patent and the 83 new claims. The two reexamination proceedings were ultimately merged. In February 2009, Plaintiff filed a response in which it agreed to cancel the 83 new claims previously proposed. On May 11, 2009, the Court entered an Order granting Defendants’ Motion to Stay the lawsuit as modified.

On May 22, 2009, the defendants accepted the terms of the Court’s proposed Stipulation regarding the use of prior art at trial and filed their Stipulation. On June 5, 2009, the USPTO issued a Final Office Action in the merged reexamination proceeding, rejecting all of Plaintiff’s claims. Plaintiff filed an appeal in the reexamination proceeding on July 7, 2009 and an appellate brief on October 8, 2009. On October 21, 2010 the USPTO Board of Patent Appeals (the “Board”) entered an order in the reexamination proceeding affirming the rejection of Antor’s claims. On December 21, 2010, Antor filed a request for rehearing before the Board. On March 23, 2011, the Board denied Antor’s request for rehearing. On May 23, 2011, Antor filed its Notice of Appeal of the Board’s October 21, 2010 decision rejecting its claims. The case will remain stayed pending the appeal. On September 28, 2011, Antor filed its Appeal Brief. The USPTO filed its brief in response to Antor’s Appeal Brief on December 12, 2011. Antor’s brief in reply is due on December 29, 2011. We and our subsidiary believe that we have meritorious defenses to all claims and intend to vigorously defend the lawsuit.

On or about November 27, 2006, John Fithian filed a consumer class action arbitration at Judicial Arbitration and Mediation Services, Inc., or JAMS, in San Jose, California, alleging a nationwide class action against our subsidiary Various, Inc. under a variety of legal theories related to, among other things, representations regarding the number of active users on its internet dating websites, causing the appearance of erroneous member profiles, and a failure to adequately remove or account for alleged erroneous member profiles. The claimant is seeking unspecified damages. Claimants moved for class certification on December 6, 2010. We dispute the claims and intend to defend the arbitration vigorously.

After our acquisition of Various, Inc. in December 2007, we became aware that Various, Inc. had not collected VAT from subscribers in the European Union nor had Various, Inc. been paying VAT to the appropriate tax jurisdictions. As of December 31, 2010, the total amount of historical uncollected VAT payments was approximately $39.4 million, including approximately $19.5 million in potential penalties and interest. However, the resulting liability for such omissions has yet to be determined and there can be no assurance that we will reach a favorable outcome with the tax jurisdictions. We have registered effective July 1, 2008 with the tax authorities of the applicable jurisdictions and effective July 29, 2008 have begun collecting VAT from our subscribers in the European Union. We have initiated discussions with most of these tax jurisdictions on resolving the liability and we have come to a resolution with respect to the liability in certain tax jurisdictions but there can be no assurance that we will reach a favorable accommodation with all of these tax jurisdictions. If we are unable to reach a favorable accommodation with these tax jurisdictions, the terms of the payment of these liabilities could adversely affect our financial condition. On June 10, 2009, the United Kingdom taxing authority notified us that it had reversed its previous position and that we are not subject to VAT in the United Kingdom in connection with providing internet services. Certain member states, including the United Kingdom, have ruled that we are not required to register and account for VAT in their jurisdiction. There can be no assurance that the tax authorities of these jurisdictions will not, at some point in the future, revise their current position and require us to register and account for VAT. Our primary recourse to the sellers for any losses suffered by us as a result of such liabilities (VAT-related or otherwise) was to offset the principal amount of the Subordinated Convertible Notes by the amount of any such losses. On October 14, 2008, we made an indemnity claim against these notes under the acquisition agreement for Various in the amount of $64.3 million due to working capital adjustments resulting from the VAT liability which was not disclosed at the closing of the acquisition. The sellers have denied responsibility for the VAT liability. On October 8, 2009, we settled and released all indemnity claims against the sellers (whether claims are VAT related or not) by adjusting the original principal amount of the Subordinated Convertible Notes to $156.0 million. In addition, the sellers agreed to make available to us, to pay VAT and certain VAT-related expenses, $10.0 million held in a working capital escrow established at the closing of the Various transaction. On November 17, 2009, we filed a lawsuit against Grant Thornton LLP and two individuals who worked for Grant Thornton LLP in the Circuit Court of the 15th Judicial Circuit in and for Palm Beach County, Florida, alleging accounting malpractice arising from the defendants’ failure to advise of the VAT issue as part of its provision of pre-acquisition due diligence services conducted on acquisition targets Various, Inc., its subsidiaries and certain affiliates. On August 17, 2010, we filed an Amended Complaint. On December 3, 2010, we filed a Second Amended Complaint. Grant Thornton LLP and the two individuals moved to dismiss this case. The Court denied portions of Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss on April 1, 2011 and entered its Order on May 9, 2011. On April 25, 2011, the Defendants filed a Motion for Reconsideration. On June 21, 2011, the Court denied Defendants’ Motion for Reconsideration. The Court set an evidentiary hearing on the issue of personal jurisdiction on its September/October 2011 trial calendar. On October 18, 2011, the Court

made an oral ruling granting the individual Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss. The Court filed its written Order on November 29, 2011. On November 17, 2010, we filed a substantially similar lawsuit in the Supreme Court of the State of New York. On August 29, 2011, the Defendants filed their Answer and Affirmative Defenses in the New York lawsuit.

On or about March 26, 2009, Kevin Cammarata filed a complaint against our subsidiary FriendFinder California, Inc. and other defendants in the State Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles in connection with their advertising on a free adult content website run by a third party known as Bright Imperial Limited. In April 2009, we and our subsidiary Various, Inc. were added as defendants. The complaint alleges that the defendants aided and abetted Bright Imperial Limited in engaging in below cost competition and unlawful use of “loss leaders” in violation of California law by providing free, apparently professionally produced adult content. The plaintiff is seeking $10.0 million in damages, trebled to at least $30.0 million, plus injunctive relief and attorneys’ fees. On May 8, 2009, the Court denied the Plaintiff’s request for an Order to Show Cause concerning its request for preliminary injunction, citing insufficient evidence among other factors. On May 26, 2009, we filed an “Anti-SLAPP” Motion to Strike the Complaint along with a Motion to Dismiss the claims in the Complaint. On or about July 24, 2009, Plaintiff stipulated to the form of an Order on the Anti-SLAPP Motion that finds in favor of us, effectively terminating the case. On August 10, 2009, Plaintiff filed his Notice of Appeal. In January 2011, the Order was affirmed by the appellate court.

On May 19, 2009, representatives for Summit Trading Limited, or Summit, sent a letter to our outside legal counsel, alleging that we, Interactive Brand Development, Inc. (a holder of our common stock) and entities affiliated with Marc Bell and Daniel Staton defrauded Summit of financial compensation for services provided to our predecessor entity, General Media Inc. Among other claims, Summit asserted bad faith breach of contract and fraud by our management and us, and claimed it is owed an equity interest in us, as well as compensatory, punitive and exemplary damages in excess of $500.0 million. No legal action has been taken to date by Summit against us. We believe that the allegations stated in the letter are vague and lack factual basis and merit. Should Summit take legal action, we would vigorously defend the lawsuit.

On November 16, 2010, Patent Harbor, LLC filed a complaint for patent infringement against, among others, Penthouse Digital Media Productions Inc. (“PDMP”), in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas. The complaint alleges an infringement of U.S. Patent No. 5,684,514 (the “514 Patent”) issued for an invention entitled “Apparatus and Method for Assembling Content Addressable Video”. No specific amount of damages has been requested. However, on November 16, 2010, we received a settlement demand from Plaintiff in the amount of $800,000, which was lowered to $500,000. On January 28, 2011, we filed an answer, affirmative defenses and counterclaims. On February 25, 2011, Patent Harbor, LLC filed an answer to our counterclaims. On August 10, 2011, Patent Harbor, LLC filed its Answer and Affirmative Defenses to our amended counterclaim. On October 4, 2011, the Markman Hearing was held, and the parties await the Court’s decision. Patent Harbor, LLC filed an Amended Complaint on October 11, 2011. On November 3, 2011, the parties entered into a settlement agreement whereby PDMP agreed to pay Patent Harbor, LLC $80,000 in exchange for a license agreement for use of the 514 Patent. The first installment of $40,000 was paid on November 15, 2011 and Patent Harbor, LLC dismissed PDMP from the lawsuit on that day. The second installment of $20,000 was paid on December 15, 2011 . The final installment of $20,000 will be paid on January 17, 2012.

On April 13, 2011, Facebook, Inc., or Facebook, filed a complaint against us and certain of our subsidiaries in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, alleging trademark infringement with regard to the use of the terms “face book of sex”. The Complaint contains causes of action for: trademark dilution, false designation of origin, trademark infringement, violation of the Anti-Cybersquatting Consumer Protection Act, and for unfair competition. The Complaint also seeks a declaratory judgment that Facebook’s use of “friend finder” on its website is a descriptive fair use that does not infringe Various’ trademark rights in the “FRIENDFINDER” mark. No specific amount of damages has been sought. However, the Complaint requests monetary relief, injunctive relief, punitive damages, cancellation of the “FRIENDFINDER” marks, attorneys’ fees, other equitable relief, and costs among other things. On May 23, 2011, the Company, and its subsidiaries, filed their Answer, Affirmative Defenses and Counterclaims to the Complaint. On June 16, 2011, Facebook filed its Answer and Affirmative Defenses to the Counterclaims. The court held a case management conference on September 29, 2011 and ordered the parties to attend mediation by January 2012. A settlement conference was held on November 4, 2011. The parties

are currently in the process of negotiating a final settlement agreement. On November 7, 2011, the Court approved the Joint Stipulation for Stay and all deadlines in the litigation are stayed pending the negotiation of the final settlement agreement.

On November 11, 2011, a putative shareholder class action was filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida by Greenfield Childrens Partnership, on behalf of investors who purchased our common stock pursuant to our initial public offering, against us, Ladenburg Thalmann & Co., Inc. and Imperial Capital LLC, the underwriters in our initial public offering, and our directors and certain of our executive officers. The complaint alleges, among other things, that our initial public offering documents contained certain of our false and misleading statements and seeks an unspecified amount of compensatory damages. We believe that we have meritorious defenses to all claims and intend to vigorously defend the lawsuit. We were served with the lawsuit on December 1, 2011 .

We believe there are currently no litigation or legal or administrative proceedings, including the ones described above, pending against us that are likely to have, individually or in the aggregate, a material adverse effect on our business or our results of operations. As described before, we recognized a loss of $13.0 million in connection with the Broadstream arbitration and ultimately entered into a settlement agreement with Broadstream on July 6, 2011, which obligates us to pay Broadstream a total of $15.0 million. The settlement agreement obligation, however, does not constitute a breach of our covenants under our Senior Secured Notes, Cash Pay Notes and Non-Cash Pay Notes resulting in an event of default.

Our New Financing

On October 27, 2010, we issued new debt to repay our then existing debt, which we refer to as the New Financing. We, along with our wholly-owned subsidiary Interactive Network, Inc., or INI, co-issued $305.0 million principal amount of Senior Secured Notes, $13.8 million of Cash Pay Notes, and $232.5 million of the Non-Cash Pay Notes.

Our Initial Public Offering

On May 16, 2011, we issued 5,000,000 shares of common stock at a price of $10.00 per share and completed our initial public offering. We raised gross proceeds of $50.0 million, less underwriting fees and commissions of 7.25% of the gross proceeds, or $3.6 million, and incurred other offering expenses of $2.9 million to be paid from the proceeds of the offering, resulting in $43.5 million of net proceeds. In addition, we had incurred and paid as of December 31, 2010, $13.3 million of offering costs, which were included in deferred offering costs in the accompanying balance sheet at December 31, 2010 and written off by a charge to capital in excess of par value in the quarter ended June 30, 2011.

On May 19, 2011, we redeemed $37,832,000 of our Senior Secured Notes and $1,709,000 of our Cash Pay Notes for a total of $39,541,000 principal amount of New Financing Notes redeemed from the net proceeds of our IPO and incurred a loss on extinguishment of debt estimated to be approximately $7.3 million. As of September 30, 2011, the outstanding principal amounts of the Senior Secured Notes, Cash Pay Notes and Non-Cash Pay Notes were $235.3 million, $10.6 million and $250.9 million, respectively.

Recent Developments

Ventures Limited, which we refer to as BDM, Global Investment Ventures LLC and Anthony R. Bobulinski, which we refer to as the Merger Agreement. Under the terms of the Merger Agreement, the shareholders of BDM, in exchange for their outstanding shares and options in BDM and its subsidiaries, received merger consideration consisting of 1,555,555, shares of our common stock, 500,000 of which will be held in escrow until no later than December 31, 2012, and warrants exercisable into 6,436,851 shares of our common stock with exercise prices ranging from $5-$18 per share with an expiration date of December 31, 2021. Pursuant to an equity put agreement we entered into, the shareholders of BDM have the option to sell all of the shares of our common stock and warrants issued as merger consideration back to us in exchange for the return of 70% of the equity in BDM if the volume-weighted average price of our common stock fails to equal or exceed $12.00 per share during any 10 trading day period principally between the closing date and the later of June 30, 2014 and the date upon which our current indentures are fully discharged, or if an “indenture modification” is made, as defined in the equity put agreement, the later of June 30, 2014 and the date the indenture modification takes place (the later date hereinafter referred to as the “Vesting Date”). The equity put agreement provides that the put right shall become exercisable at the sole discretion of the shareholders’ appointed representative during the period commencing on the Vesting Date and expiring sixty (60) days thereafter. Additionally, if the shareholders of BDM exercise the put right, we have the right to pay them in our common stock and/or cash, having a combined value as of the later of the above dates equal to the product of (i) 2,209,414 shares of common stock (subject to dilutive adjustment) and (ii) the difference between the highest 10 day volume-weighted average price attained by our common stock during such period and $12.00, in which case the put right terminates. Pursuant to a registration rights agreement, we also granted demand registration rights under certain circumstances, with respect to the shares of our common stock and warrants issued as merger consideration. JigoCity is a global social commerce organization committed to providing members with high quality daily deals that are relevant to their individual lifestyles. The acquisition of JigoCity adds to our portfolio a social commerce company and what we believe will be an additional avenue to monetize our foreign markets.

Our Corporate Information

MARKET PRICE OF AND DIVIDENDS ON THE REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

Our common stock is listed and posted for trading on NASDAQ under the trading symbol “FFN.” Our common stock commenced trading on NASDAQ on May 11, 2011. On December 1 5 , 2011, the last reported sales price of our common stock on NASDAQ was $ 0. 59 per share.

The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, the high and low per share sale prices of our common stock, as reported by NASDAQ.

	Price Range of Common Stock
	High		Low
2011
Second Quarter (commencing May, 11, 2011)	$	10.01	$	3.61
Third Quarter (through September 30, 2011)	$	5.22	$	1.81
Fourth Quarter (through December 1 5 , 2011)	$	2.20	$	0. 59

As of December 14 , 2011, there were 31,219,644 shares of our common stock issued and outstanding and we had 68 registered stockholders of record.

We have never paid or declared dividends on our common stock. Furthermore, we are prohibited by the provisions in our Indentures, on declaring dividends. In addition we expect that any future credit facility will contain terms prohibiting or limiting the amount of dividends that may be declared or paid on our common stock. We do not anticipate that we will pay any dividends to holders of our common stock in the foreseeable future, as we currently plan to retain any earnings to fund our future growth and repay existing indebtedness. Payments of any cash dividends in the future, however, is within the discretion of our board of directors and will depend on our financial condition, results of operations and capital and legal requirements as well as other factors deemed relevant by our board of directors.

Equity Compensation Plan Information Table

The following information is with respect to our 2008 Stock Option Plan and 2009 Restricted Stock Plan for the fiscal year 2010.

Plan Category	Number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options, warrants and rights			Weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options, warrants and rights		Number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans (excluding securities reflected in column (a))
	(a)			(b)		(c)
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders		—			—		—
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders		551,750	⁽¹⁾	$	10.00		1,186,122	⁽¹⁾
Total		551,750	⁽¹⁾	$	10.00		1,186,122	⁽¹⁾

(1)

The information set forth above pertains to our 2008 Stock Option Plan and our 2009 Restricted Stock Plan as of December 31, 2010. For a discussion of our 2008 Stock Option Plan please refer to the section entitled “— Executive Compensation — Executive Compensation Components — Long Term Equity Incentive Compensation” or refer to Note 11, “Stock Options” of our consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this prospectus.

SELECTED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL DATA

The following tables set forth selected historical consolidated financial data of the Company as of the dates and for the periods indicated. The statement of operations data for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008 as well as the balance sheet data as of December 31, 2010 and 2009 are derived from our audited consolidated financial statements also included as part of this prospectus. The statement of operations data for the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006 and the balance sheet data as of December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006 are derived from our audited consolidated financial statements which are not contained in this prospectus. The statement of operations data for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010 as well as the balance sheet data as of September 30, 2011 and 2010 are derived from our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements also included as part of this prospectus. The audited consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with GAAP and have been audited by EisnerAmper LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm.

These historic results are not necessarily indicative of results for any future period. You should read the following selected financial data in conjunction with the section entitled “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and the financial statements and related notes included elsewhere in this prospectus.

	Consolidated Data
	Nine Months Ended September 30,						Year Ended December 31,
	2011			2010			2010			2009			2008⁽¹⁾			2007⁽¹⁾			2006
	(in thousands, except per share data)
Statements of Operations and Per Share Data:
Net revenue	$	249,627		$	257,490		$	345,997		$	327,692		$	331,017		$	48,073		$	29,965
Cost of revenue		79,806			84,790			110,490			91,697			96,514			23,330			15,927
Gross profit		169,821			172,700			235,507			235,995			234,503			24,743			14,038
Operating expenses
Product development		12,080			9,304			12,834			13,500			14,553			1,002			—
Selling and marketing		22,679			30,589			37,258			42,902			59,281			7,595			1,430
General and administrative		67,507			60,155			79,855			76,863			88,280			24,466			24,354
Amortization of acquired intangibles and software		11,906			18,793			24,461			35,454			36,347			2,262			—
Depreciation and other amortization		3,268			3,556			4,704			4,881			4,502			2,829			3,322
Impairment of goodwill		—			—			—			—			9,571			925			22,824
Impairment of other intangible assets		—			—			4,660			4,000			14,860			5,131			—
Total operating expenses		117,440			122,397			163,772			177,600			227,394			44,210			51,930
Income (loss) from operations		52,381			50,303			71,735			58,395			7,109			(19,467	)		(37,892	)
Interest expense, net of interest income		(65,097	)		(69,128	)		(88,508	)		(92,139	)		(80,510	)		(15,953	)		(7,918	)
Other finance expenses		—			—			(4,562	)		—			—			—			—
Interest related to VAT liability not charged to customers		(1,410	)		(1,742	)		(2,293	)		(4,205	)		(8,429	)		(1,592	)		—
Net loss on extinguishment and modification of debt		(7,312	)		—			(7,457	)		(7,240	)		—			—			(3,799	)
Foreign exchange gain (loss) principally related to VAT liability not charged to customers		(1,521	)		436			610			(5,530	)		15,195			546			—
Gain on elimination of liability for United Kingdom VAT not charged to customers		—			—			—			1,561			—			—			—
Gain on settlement of VAT liability not charged to customers		—			—			—			232			2,690			—			—
Gain on liability related to warrants		391			427			38			2,744			—			—			—
Other non-operating (expense) income, net		(3,912	)		5			(13,202	)		(366	)		(197	)		119			(332	)
Loss before income tax benefit		(26,480	)		(19,699	)		(43,639	)		(46,548	)		(64,142	)		(36,347	)		(49,941	)
Income tax expense (benefit)		(5,542	)		(219	)		486			5,332			18,176			6,430			—

	Consolidated Data
	Nine Months Ended September 30,						Year Ended December 31,
	2011			2010			2010			2009			2008⁽¹⁾			2007⁽¹⁾			2006
	(in thousands, except per share data)
Net loss	$	(20,938	)	$	(19,480	)	$	(43,153	)	$	(41,216	)	$	(45,966	)	$	(29,917	)	$	(49,941	)
Non-cash dividends on convertible preferred stock		—			—			—			—			—			(4,396	)		—
Net loss attributable to common stock	$	(20,938	)	$	(19,480	)	$	(43,153	)	$	(41,216	)	$	(45,966	)	$	(34,313	)	$	(49,941	)
Net loss per common share — basic and diluted⁽²⁾	$	(1.02	)	$	(1.42	)	$	(3.14	)	$	(3.00	)	$	(3.35	)	$	(5.19	)	$	(8.99	)
Weighted average common shares outstanding — basic and diluted⁽²⁾		20,505			13,735			13,735			13,735			13,735			6,610			5,554
Pro forma net loss per common share — basic and diluted⁽³⁾							$	(1.37	)
Pro forma weighted average common shares outstanding — basic and diluted⁽³⁾								27,703

	Consolidated Data
	Nine Months Ended September 30,						December 31,
	2011			2010			2010			2009			2008⁽²⁾			2007⁽²⁾			2006
	(in thousands)
Consolidated Balance Sheet Data (at period end):
Cash and restricted cash	$	28,204		$	36,021		$	41,970		$	28,895		$	31,565		$	23,722		$	2,998
Total assets		498,833			552,247			532,817			551,881			599,913			649,868			70,770
Long-term debt classified as current due to events of default, net of unamortized discount		7,926			3,531			15,009			56,116			415,606			417,310			333
Long-term debt, net of unamortized discount		453,449			492,539			510,551			432,028			38,768			35,379			63,166
Deferred revenue		44,285			50,091			48,302			46,046			42,814			27,214			6,974
Total liabilities		617,810			678,196			682,597			657,523			657,998			661,987			91,516
Redeemable preferred stock		—			—			—			26,000			26,000			26,000			21,000
Accumulated deficit		(251,559	)		(207,775	)		(230,621	)		(187,468	)		(144,667	)		(98,701	)		(68,784	)
Total stockholders’ deficiency		(118,977	)		(125,949	)		(149,780	)		(131,642	)		(84,085	)		(38,119	)		(41,746	)

	Consolidated Data
	Nine Months Ended September 30,						Year Ended December 31,
	2011			2010			2010			2009			2008⁽¹⁾			2007⁽¹⁾			2006
	(in thousands, except per share data)
Other Data
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities	$	21,607		$	28,677		$	42,640		$	39,679		$	50,948		$	4,744		$	(16,600	)
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities		(6,524	)		(551	)		(1,250	)		4,204			(9,289	)		(149,322	)		(3,414	)
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities		(33,198	)		(21,921	)		(29,405	)		(44,987	)		(25,336	)		148,961			10,569

(1)

Net revenue for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007 does not reflect $19.2 million and $8.5 million, respectively, due to a non-recurring purchase accounting adjustment that required the deferred revenue at the date of the acquisition of Various to be recorded at fair value. Management believes that it is appropriate to add back the deferred revenue adjustment because the average renewal rate of the subscriptions that were the basis for the deferred revenue was approximately 63%. The renewal rate on subscriptions that had already been renewed at least one time since the acquisition was 78%. Therefore, management believes that historical results of Various are reflective, including those revenues that were added back to the adjusted net revenue, of our future results. Please refer to the table contained

in the “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” above entitled “Reconciliation of GAAP Net Loss to EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA”.

(2)

Basic and diluted loss per share is based on the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding, including Series B common stock, and shares underlying common stock purchase warrants which are exercisable at the nominal price of $0.0002 per share. For information regarding the computation of per share amounts, refer to Note C(25), “Summary of Significant Accounting Policies — Per share data” of our consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this prospectus.

(3)

The following pro forma information reflects the following transactions as if they occurred on January 1, 2010: (i) the sale of 5,000,000 shares of our common stock at an initial offering price of $10.00 per share and the receipt of net proceeds of $44.9 million, (ii) the repayment of principal of $40.8 million on outstanding notes, (iii) the issuance of 8,444,853 shares of common stock upon the conversion of the outstanding shares of Series B convertible preferred stock and (iv) the issuance of 4,526,471 shares of common stock underlying 4,003,898 warrants with an exercise price of $0.0002 per share which if not exercised expired upon the closing of the initial public offering.

Net loss as reported	$	(43,153	)
Pro forma adjustments:
1. A reduction in interest expense resulting from the repayment of a portion of the former Senior Secured Notes and Second Lien Notes using a weighted average effective interest rate of 20.3%		8,300
2. Amortization of the $13.0 million beneficial conversion feature in the Old Non-Cash Pay Notes which mature on April 30, 2014		(3,200	)
Pro forma net loss	$	(38,053	)^(a)
Weighted average common shares outstanding — basic and diluted		13,735
Pro forma adjustments:
1. Issuance of common stock upon the conversion of all of the outstanding shares of Series B Convertible Preferred Stock		8,445
2. An increase in the shares of common stock underlying certain of our warrants resulting from the anti-dilution provisions of such warrants		523
3. The sale of common stock in the IPO		5,000
Pro forma weighted average shares outstanding		27,703
Pro forma net loss per common share — basic and diluted	$	(1.37	)^(a)

(a)

The pro forma net loss per common share excludes (i) loss on extinguishment of our Old Senior Secured Notes and Old Cash Pay Notes of $8.5 million and (ii) $2.2 million of cumulative compensation expense related to stock options deemed granted upon the completion of the IPO, representing non-recurring charges directly attributable to the IPO.

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The following discussion of our financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with our audited consolidated financial statements and the related notes thereto included elsewhere in this prospectus. This discussion contains forward-looking statements, based on current expectations and related to future events and our future financial performance, that involve risks and uncertainties. Our actual results may differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements as a result of many factors, including those set forth under the section entitled “Risk Factors” and elsewhere in this prospectus.

Overview

We operate in two segments, internet and entertainment. Our internet segment offers services and features that include social networking, online personals, premium content, live interactive video, recorded video, online chatrooms, instant messaging, photo, video and voice sharing, blogs, message board, free e-mail and with our recent acquisition of Jigo City, social commerce. Our revenues to date have been primarily derived from online subscription and paid-usage for our internet segment products and services. Our market strategy is to grow this segment and expand our service offerings with complimentary services and features. Our entertainment segment produces and distributes original pictorial and video content, licenses the globally-recognized Penthouse brand to a variety of consumer product companies and entertainment venues and publishes branded men’s lifestyle magazines. We continually seek to expand our licenses and products in new markets and retail categories both domestically and internationally.

Our History

Our predecessor company was incorporated in Delaware in 1993 under the name General Media, Inc., or GMI. GMI filed for bankruptcy on August 12, 2003 under Chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code and in September 2003, Marc H. Bell and Daniel C. Staton formed PET Capital Partners LLC, or PET, to acquire GMI’s secured notes and preferred stock.

On October 5, 2004, GMI emerged from Chapter 11 protection with all new equity distributed solely to the holders of the GMI secured notes. The reorganized capital structure also included approximately $35.8 million of term loan notes (the “Term Loan Notes”) distributed to former secured and unsecured creditors. Concurrently with the emergence from Chapter 11, we changed the name of the company to Penthouse Media Group Inc. and PET sold a minority position of non-voting Series B common stock to Interactive Brand Development Inc., or IBD.

During 2005, we consummated the sale of $33.0 million of 2005 Notes and $15.0 million of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock to fund the retirement of a $20.0 million credit facility, to fund the repayment of $11.8 million of the Term Loan Notes and to fund the purchase of certain trademark assets and for general corporate purposes. The remaining outstanding Term Loan Notes were reissued as subordinated term loan notes (the “Subordinated Term Loan Notes”).

On March 31, 2006, we changed our state of incorporation from Delaware to Nevada.

On August 28, 2006, we consummated an offering of $5.0 million of 2006 Notes and $6.0 million of additional Series A Convertible Preferred Stock to fund the acquisition of substantially all of the assets of the debtor estate of Jill Kelly Productions, Inc., a production company, and for general corporate purposes.

On October 25, 2006, we acquired the outstanding shares of the Danni.com business, an adult internet content provider, for $1.4 million in cash and approximately 126,000 shares of common stock valued at $1.5 million, for which we issued an additional $0.9 million of Subordinated Term Loan Notes to fund part of the purchase price consideration.

In December 2007, we acquired Various for approximately $401.0 million. The purchase price of approximately $401.0 million paid to the sellers consisted of approximately (i) $137.0 million in cash, (ii) notes valued at approximately $248.0 million, and (iii) warrants to acquire approximately 2.9 million shares of common stock, subject to adjustment for certain anti-dilution provisions, valued at approximately $16.0 million. The purchase price gives effect to a $61.0 million reduction attributable to a post-closing working capital adjustment which resulted in a $51.0 million reduction in the value of notes issued and a $10.0 million reduction in cash paid which was held in escrow. This adjustment is the result of our indemnity claim against the sellers relating to the VAT liability. In addition, legal and other acquisition costs totaling approximately $4.0 million were incurred. The cash portion of the purchase price was obtained through the issuance of notes and warrants, including approximately $110.0 million from certain of our stockholders. On June 10, 2009, the United Kingdom taxing authority notified us that it had reversed its previous position and that we were not subject to VAT, which resulted in an approximately $39.5 million reduction in the VAT liability. On October 8, 2009, we settled all indemnity claims against the sellers (whether claims are VAT related or not) by adjusting the original principal amount of the Subordinated Convertible Notes to $156.0 million. In addition, the sellers agreed to make available to us, to pay VAT and certain VAT-related expenses, $10.0 million held in a working capital escrow account established at the closing of the Various transaction. As of December 31, 2010, a total of $10 million has been released from the escrow to reimburse us for VAT-related expenses already incurred. If the actual costs to us of eliminating the VAT liability are less than $29.0 million, after applying amounts from the working capital escrow, then the principal amount of the Non-Cash Pay Second Lien Notes (which were issued in exchange for the Subordinated Convertible Notes in the New Financing) will be increased by the issuance of new Non-Cash Pay Second Lien Notes to reflect the difference between $29.0 million and the actual VAT liability, plus interest on such difference.

In December 2007, we consummated an offering of $5.0 million of Series B Convertible Preferred Stock at a price of $0.59208 per share. The purchasers in the offering included certain current stockholders, including Messrs. Staton and Bell, Florescue Family Corporation, an entity affiliated with one of our directors, Barry Florescue, and Absolute Income Fund Ltd. We used the proceeds from the Series B Convertible Preferred Stock offering to pay expenses relating to our acquisition of Various in December 2007 and for working capital. In July, 2008, we changed our name from Penthouse Media Group Inc. to FriendFinder Networks Inc.

On October 27, 2010, the Company completed the New Financing. The First Lien Senior Secured Notes, with an outstanding principal amount of $167.1 million, the Second Lien Subordinated Notes, with an outstanding principal amount of $80.0 million and $32.8 million principal amount of 2005 and 2006 Notes were exchanged for, or redeemed with proceeds of, $305.5 million principal amount of New First Lien Notes. The remaining $13.5 million principal amount of 2005 Notes and 2006 Notes were exchanged for $13.8 million principal amount of Cash Pay Second Lien Notes. The Subordinated Convertible Notes and Subordinated Term Loan Notes, with outstanding principal amounts of $180.2 million and $42.8 million respectively, together with accrued interest of $9.5 million, were exchanged for $232.5 million principal amount of Non-Cash Pay Second Lien Notes.

On May 16, 2011, the Company issued 5,000,000 shares of common stock at a price of $10.00 per share and completed its IPO. The Company raised gross proceeds of $50.0 million, less underwriting fees and commissions of 7.25% of the gross proceeds, or $3.6 million, and incurred other offering expenses of $2.9 million to be paid from the proceeds of the offering, resulting in $43.5 million of net proceeds. In addition, the Company had incurred and paid as of December 31, 2010, $13.2 million of offering costs, which were included in deferred offering costs in the accompanying balance sheet at December 31, 2010. The Company incurred an additional $3.0 million in offering costs during 2011 totaling $16.2 million which was transferred to paid in capital upon completion of the IPO.

On July 12, 2011, the Company acquired substantially all the assets of PerfectMatch.com from Matrima, Inc. for $2,000,000 in cash and $500,000 in common shares. PerfectMatch.com is an online relationship service helping adults seeking successful lasting connections.

On September 7, 2011, the Company acquired BDM Global Ventures Ltd., the company which owns the operations of JigoCity, for a combination of stock and warrants. The merger consideration consists of approximately

1.6 million shares of FFN common stock and approximately 6.4 million FFN warrants with exercise prices ranging from $5.00–$18.00 per share and is valued at approximately $7.5 million. JigoCity is a global social commerce organization committed to providing members with high quality daily deals that are relevant to their individual lifestyles. It leverages the power of social buying to give people a smarter way to see their city. With 150 employees providing services in over 20 cities and offices in Australia, Hong Kong, Singapore, Malaysia, Taiwan, China, South Korea, Brazil and Los Angeles, JigoCity is one of the fastest growing, global companies in the social commerce arena.

Key Factors Affecting Our Results of Operations

Net Revenue

Our net revenue is affected primarily by the overall demand for online social networking and personals services. Our net revenue is also affected by our ability to deliver user content together with the services and features required by our users’ diverse cultures, ethnicities and interest groups.

The level of our net revenue depends to a large degree on the growth of internet users, increased internet usage per user and demand for adult content. Our net revenue also depends on demand for credit card availability and the payment methods in countries in which we have registrants, members, subscribers and paid users, general economic conditions, and government regulation. The demand for entertainment and leisure activities tends to be highly sensitive to consumers’ disposable incomes, and thus a decline in general economic conditions may lead to our current and potential registrants, members, subscribers and paid users having less discretionary income to spend. This could lead to a reduction in our revenue and have a material adverse effect on our operating results.

In addition, our net revenue could be impacted by foreign and domestic government laws that affect companies conducting business on the internet. Laws which may affect our operations relating to payment methods, including the use of credit cards, user privacy, freedom of expression, content, advertising, information security, internet obscenity and intellectual property rights are currently being considered for adoption by many countries throughout the world.

Internet Revenue

Approximately 93.5%, 93.8% and 93.0% of our net revenue for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010 and for the year ended December 31, 2010, respectively, was generated from our internet segment comprised of social networking, live interactive video, premium content websites and social commerce. This revenue is treated as service revenue in our financial statements. We derive our revenue primarily from subscription fees and pay-by-usage fees. These fees are charged in advance and recognized as revenue over the term of the subscription or as the advance payment is consumed on the pay-by-usage basis, which is usually immediately. VAT is presented on a net basis and is excluded from revenue. We record revenue from JigoCity at the net amount we retain from the sale of JigoCity’s after paying an agreed upon percentage of the purchase price to the merchant excluding any applicable taxes. Revenue is recorded on a net basis because we are acting as an agent of the merchant in the transaction.

Net revenue consists of all revenue net of credits back to customers for disputed charges and any chargeback expenses from credit card processing banks for such items as cancelled subscriptions, stolen cards and non-payment of cards. We estimate the amount of chargebacks and credits that will occur in future periods to offset current revenue. For the nine months ended September 30, 2011, and 2010 and for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009, and 2008, these credits and chargebacks were 6.3%, 6.1%, 6.0%, 4.7% and 3.6%, respectively, of gross revenue, while chargebacks alone were 1.3%, 1.4%, 1.4%, 1.2% and 0.7%, respectively, of gross revenue for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010 and for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively.

We believe that we have new opportunities to substantially increase revenue by adding new features to our websites, expanding in foreign markets and generating third party advertising revenue from our internet websites, which allow us to target specific demographics and interest groups within our user base. However, our revenue growth rate may decline in the future as a result of increased penetration of our services over time and as a result of increased competition.

Entertainment Revenue

Approximately 6.5%, 6.2% and 7.0% of our net revenue for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010 and the year ended December 31, 2010, respectively, was generated by the entertainment segment. Entertainment revenue consists of studio production and distribution, licensing of the Penthouse name, logos, trademarks and artwork for the manufacture, sale and distribution of consumer products and publishing revenue. This revenue is treated as product revenue in our financial statements, with the exception of revenue derived from licensing, which is treated as service revenue. For more information regarding our net revenue by service and product, see Notes O and 14, “Segment Information” of our consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this prospectus. We derive revenue through third party license agreements for the distribution of our programming where we either receive a percentage of revenue or a fixed fee.

The revenue sharing arrangements are usually either a percentage of the subscription fee paid by the customer or a percentage of single program or title fee purchased by the customer. Our fixed fee contracts may receive a fixed amount of revenue per title, group of titles or for a certain amount of programming during a period of time. Revenue from the sale of magazines at newsstands is recognized on the on-sale date of each issue based on an estimate of the total sell through, net of estimated returns. The amount of estimated revenue is adjusted in subsequent periods as sales and returns information becomes available. Revenue from the sale of magazine subscriptions is recognized ratably over their respective terms.

Cost of Revenue

Cost of revenue for the internet segment is primarily comprised of commissions, which are expensed as incurred, paid to our affiliate websites and revenue shares for online models and studios in connection with our live interactive video websites. We estimate that cost of revenue will decrease as a percentage of net revenue primarily due to improvement in our affiliate commission structure and revenue sharing arrangements with our models and studios as net revenue increases. Cost of revenue for the entertainment segment consists primarily of publishing costs including costs of printing and distributing magazines and studio costs which principally consist of the cost of the production of videos. These costs are capitalized and amortized over three years which represents the estimated period during which substantially all the revenue from the content will be realized.

Marketing Affiliates

Our marketing affiliates are companies that operate websites that market our services on their websites and direct visitor traffic to our websites by placing banners or links on their websites to one or more of our websites.

The total net revenues derived from these marketing affiliates have decreased from year to year during the periods shown, while the percentage of revenue contribution has increased. The compensation to affiliates can vary depending on whether an affiliate chooses to be compensated on a pay-per-order or revenue sharing basis. Under a pay-per-order agreement, we compensate an affiliate one-time for each new member that places an order. Under a revenue sharing agreement, we compensate the affiliate in perpetuity for as long as the member continues to renew their subscription. Depending on the longevity of the subscription, either of the two compensation methods can result in a higher expense to us. In addition, we occasionally modify the pay-per-order compensation amount as needed depending on the quality of the traffic sent by the affiliate, economic factors, competition and other criteria.

Our compensation to our marketing affiliates has decreased and the percentage of revenues from our marketing affiliates have increased modestly, reflecting the variability in the rate at which we compensate our marketing affiliates described above. The percentage of revenues derived from these affiliates and the compensation to our affiliates for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010 are set forth below:

	Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2011			2010
Percentage of revenue contributed by affiliates		46	%		44	%
Compensation to affiliates (in millions)	$	47.9		$	55.8

The percentage of revenues derived from these affiliates and the compensation to our affiliates for the year ended December 31, 2010 and the previous two fiscal years are set forth below:

	Year Ended December 31,
	2010			2009			2008
Percentage of revenue contributed by affiliates		45	%		44	%		43	%
Compensation to affiliates (in millions)	$	71.2		$	56.7		$	62.3

Operating Expenses

Product Development

Product development expense consists of the costs incurred for maintaining the technical staff which are primarily comprised of engineering salaries related to the planning and post-implementation stages of our website development efforts. These costs also include amortization of the capitalized website costs attributable to the application development stage. We expect our product development expenses to remain stable as a percentage of revenue as we continue to develop new websites, services, content and features which will generate revenue in the future.

Selling and Marketing

Selling and marketing expenses consist principally of advertising costs, which we pay to companies that operate internet search engines for key word searches in order to generate traffic to our websites. Selling and marketing expenses also include salaries and incentive compensation for selling and marketing personnel and related costs such as public relations. Additionally, the entertainment segment includes certain nominal promotional publishing expenses. We believe that our selling and marketing expenses will remain relatively constant as a percentage of revenue as these expenses are relatively variable and within the discretion of management.

General and Administrative

General and administrative expenses relate primarily to our corporate personnel related costs, professional fees, occupancy, credit card processing fees and other overhead costs.

Stock Based Compensation

Based on the initial public offering price of $10.00 per share on May 11, 2011, stock-based compensation for the nine months ended September 30, 2011, was approximately $2.6 million. Of such amounts, a cumulative adjustment to compensation expense of approximately $1,974,000 was recognized in May 2011 upon the completion of our IPO.

Amortization of Acquired Intangibles and Software

Amortization of acquired intangibles and software is primarily attributable to intangible assets and internal-use software from acquisitions. Identified intangibles and internal-use software resulting from acquisitions were recorded at the acquisition date fair value. The total fair value of these intangibles and internal-use software acquired from Various in 2007 was $182.5 million. The amortization periods vary from two to five years with the weighted average amortization period equaling approximately three years. The total fair value of the intangibles and internal use software from PerfectMatch and JigoCity was $1.0 million and $3.3 million, respectively. The amortization periods vary from two to three years with the weighted average amortization period being 2.5 years for both PerfectMatch and JigoCity. We recognized amortization expense associated with these assets of $11.9 million, $18.8 million, $24.5 million, $35.5 million and $36.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010 and for the three years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively. If we acquire other businesses which results in us owning additional intangible assets, the amortization of any acquired intangible assets could cause our depreciation and amortization expense to increase as a percentage of net revenue.

Depreciation and Other Amortization

Depreciation and other amortization is primarily depreciation expense on our computer equipment. We expect our depreciation and other amortization expenses to decrease due to purchases of new hardware and software associated with our growth plans increasing at a slower rate than our anticipated growth in net revenue.

Impairment of Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets

Impairment of goodwill and other intangible assets is recognized when we determine that the carrying value of goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets is greater than the fair value. We assess goodwill and other indefinite-lived intangibles at least annually, and more frequently when circumstances indicate that the carrying value may be impaired. We recorded goodwill impairment charges of $6.8 million in 2008 related to our internet segment and $2.8 million in 2008 related to our entertainment segment. In addition, we also recorded impairment charges related to our trademarks of $4.7 million, $4.0 million and $14.9 million in 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively, related to our entertainment segment. We do not expect that there will be future impairment recorded to goodwill and intangible assets based on current information available. However, if future circumstances change and the fair values of goodwill or intangible assets is less than the current carrying value, additional impairment losses will be recognized.

Interest Expense, Net of Interest Income

Interest expense, net of interest income mainly represents interest expense recognized from the debt incurred in connection with the acquisition of Various and the New Financing and an increase in interest expense related to our debt incurred prior to the acquisition. Included in interest expense is amortization of note discounts due to certain warrants issued in connection with our 2005 Notes, 2006 Notes, First Lien Senior Secured Notes and Second Lien Subordinated Secured Notes and amortization of a discount to record the fair value of the Subordinated Convertible Notes at the date of issuance. As the exchange of such notes was not accounted for as extinguishment (as described in “Note 9 — Long-Term Debt” in our condensed consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this prospectus), subsequent to our debt restructuring on October 27, 2010, interest expense continues to include such amortization together with amortization of original issue discount related to our Senior Secured Notes and Cash Pay Notes and amortization of discount to record the fair value of certain Non-Cash Pay Notes at the date of issuance. Interest expense also includes amortization of deferred debt costs and the 2% premium paid in connection with payment of debt from excess cash flow each quarter.

Other Finance Expenses

Other finance expenses relates to charges incurred with our New Financing that was completed on October 27, 2010. These expenses were for third party fees related to the Senior Secured Notes which were determined to be not substantially different from the outstanding First Lien Notes and Second Lien Notes they were exchanged for, and therefore not accounted for as an extinguishment of debt (See “Net Loss on Extinguishment and Modification of Debt” below).

Interest and Penalties Related to VAT Liability not Charged to Customers

Interest and penalties related to VAT not charged to customers are due to our failure to file VAT tax returns and pay VAT based on the applicable law of each country in the European Union. Commencing in 2003, the member states of the European Union implemented rules requiring the collection and payment of VAT on revenues generated by non-European Union businesses that provide electronic services that are purchased by end users within the European Union. We did not begin collecting VAT from our subscribers until July 2008. At September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the total amount of uncollected VAT payments was approximately $40.3 million and $39.4 million, respectively. For more information regarding our potential VAT liability, see Note 8 — “VAT Liabilities” in our condensed consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this prospectus. The majority of the penalties assessed by the various tax jurisdictions related to the VAT liability were incurred prior to our purchase of Various and thus charged back to the sellers by an offset in the principal amount of the Subordinated Convertible Notes held by the sellers. The portion of interest incurred prior to the purchase of Various was also

charged back to the sellers by an offset in the principal amount of the Subordinated Convertible Notes held by the sellers, and subsequently continues to be recorded on the unpaid amounts. On October 14, 2008, we made an indemnity claim against these notes under the acquisition agreement for Various in the amount of $64.3 million. On June 10, 2009, the United Kingdom taxing authority notified us that it had reversed its previous position and that we were not subject to VAT, which resulted in an approximately $39.5 million reduction in the VAT liability. On October 8, 2009, we settled and released all indemnity claims against the sellers (whether claims are VAT related or not) by reducing the original principal amount of the Subordinated Convertible Notes by the full value of the then-outstanding VAT liability. In addition, the sellers agreed to make available to us, to pay VAT and certain VAT-related expenses, $10.0 million held in a working capital escrow account established at the closing of the Various transaction. As of December 1, 2010, the total $10.0 million had been released from the escrow to reimburse us for VAT-related expenses already incurred. If the actual costs to us of eliminating the VAT liability are less than $29.0 million, after applying amounts from the working capital escrow, then the principal amount of the Non-Cash Pay Notes (notes issued in exchange for the Subordinated Convertible Notes in the New Financing) will be increased by the issuance of new Non-Cash Pay Notes to reflect the difference between $29.0 million and the actual VAT liability, plus interest on such difference. For more information regarding the reductions of the principal amount of Subordinated Convertible Notes as a result of our VAT liability, see Note 8 — “VAT Liabilities”.

Net Loss on Extinguishment and Modification of Debt

In 2010, we refinanced substantially all of our existing debt into Senior Secured Notes, Cash Pay Notes and Non-Cash Pay Notes. As a result, we recorded a loss on extinguishment of $7.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2010. Such loss was determined by us reviewing each of our former lines of debt and determining if a substantial modification was made for each line. We determined that the Senior Secured Notes and Cash Pay Notes were substantially different than the outstanding principal amount of former Senior Secured Notes for which they were exchanged, resulting in an extinguishment of the former Senior Secured Notes. An extinguishment loss of $10.5 million was recorded for such exchange and for the former Senior Secured Notes, First Lien Notes and Second Lien Notes redeemed for cash. Such loss includes payment of fees to lenders. We also determined that the Non-Cash Pay Notes were substantially different than the non-convertible Subordinated Term Notes for which they were exchanged based on the conversion feature in the Non-Cash Pay Notes, resulting in a gain on extinguishment of $3.0 million related to the excess of the carrying value of the Subordinated Term Notes over the fair value of the Non-Cash Pay Notes for which they were exchanged. In 2009, the loss on modification of debt relates to our decision to eliminate the option to convert the Convertible Notes at our option into common stock and agreeing to set the principal amount at $156.0 million which was considered to result in an exchange of debt instruments with substantially different terms thereby requiring us to account for the modification like an extinguishment of the existing Convertible Notes and the creation of new Convertible Notes. This modification resulted in us recording a charge for the extinguishment of debt of approximately $7.2 million attributable to the excess of the fair value of the modified notes over the carrying value of the existing notes plus the $2.3 million present value of the $3.2 million of fees owed to the former owner of Various.

Loss on extinguishment of debt is related to redeeming $37,832,000 of Senior Secured Notes and $1,709,000 of Cash Pay Notes on May 19, 2011 from the net proceeds of the IPO at 110% of principal incurring a loss on extinguishment of debt of approximately $3.9 million. In addition, with the redemption there was additional discount and refinancing fee amortization of $3.4 million resulting in a total loss on extinguishment of debt of $7.3 million.

Foreign Exchange Gain/(Loss), Principally Related to VAT Liability not Charged to Customers

Foreign exchange gain or loss principally related to VAT liability not charged to customers is the result of the fluctuation in the U.S. dollar against foreign currencies. We record a gain when the dollar strengthens against foreign currencies and a loss when the dollar weakens against those currencies. Our primary exposure to foreign fluctuations is related to the liability related to VAT not charged to customers, the majority of which is denominated in Euros.

Gain on Settlement of VAT Liability not Charged to Customers

Gain on settlement of liability related to VAT not charged to customers reflects our settlement of liabilities related to VAT not charged to customers owed at amounts less than what we had recorded. We have been able to settle with or pay in full certain tax jurisdictions on favorable terms, which resulted in the gain. However, we still have numerous tax jurisdictions remaining to be resolved that may result in our recording a gain or loss.

Gain on Elimination of Liability for United Kingdom VAT not Charged to Customers

Gain on elimination of liability for United Kingdom VAT not charged to customers reflects the elimination of liabilities related to VAT not charged to customers in the United Kingdom. This gain was due to the United Kingdom taxing authority notifying us that it had reversed its previous position and that we were not subject to VAT in the United Kingdom in connection with providing internet services.

Gain/(Loss) on Liability Related to Warrants

Gain/(Loss) on liability related to warrants reflects our warrants issued in conjunction with the August 2005 issuance of the Senior Secured Notes. We issued warrants to purchase 501,663 shares of our common stock (of which 476,573 were exercisable at $6.20 per share and 25,090 were exercisable at $10.25 per share). The warrants contain a provision that required a reduction of the exercise price if certain equity events occur. Under the provisions of authoritative guidance that became effective for us on January 1, 2009, such a reset provision no longer makes the warrants eligible for equity classification and as such, effective January 1, 2009, we classified these warrants as a liability at a fair value of $6.3 million with a corresponding increase of $1.6 million to accumulated deficit and a $4.8 million reduction to capital in excess of par value. The liability is measured at fair value with changes in fair value reflected in the statement of operations.

In connection therewith, the statement of operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010 reflects a gain of $391,000 and a gain of $427,000, respectively, on re-measurement of the liability. On May 16, 2011, concurrently with the consummation of the Company’s IPO, warrants to issue 457,843 shares of common stock at $6.20 per share were net settled, whereby 174,246 shares of common stock were issued upon exercise, equivalent to the intrinsic value of the warrants based on the IPO price of $10 per share, and the Company did not receive any cash proceeds. In addition, warrants to acquire 24,104 common shares at $10.25 per share were terminated as they were not exercised. Accordingly, in May 2011, the liability related to the warrants was eliminated with the carrying value of $3,168,000 related to the exercised warrants transferred to capital in excess of par value and the carrying value of $119,000 related to the terminated warrants recorded as non-operating income. As such, there was no gain or loss on the liability related to warrants for the nine months ended September 30, 2011. For further information, see “Note 10-Liability Related to Warrants” in our consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this prospectus.

Other Non-Operating Income/Expenses, Net

Other non-operating income and expenses include miscellaneous transactions not related to our primary operations. Included in the nine months ended September 30, 2011 is the settlement of our Broadstream arbitration case for $15.0 million, which required us to record an additional $5.0 million of expense. For further information, see “Note 16-Contingencies” in our consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this prospectus. Also included in the nine months ended September 30, 2011 is life insurance proceeds related to the death of the original founder of Penthouse, Robert Guccione of $1.1 million.

Income Tax Provision (Benefit)

We had an income tax benefit of $5.5 million and $219,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and September 30, 2010, respectively. The tax benefit in the nine months ended September 30, 2011, relates to a reduction in the valuation allowance resulting from the recording of an approximately $5.7 million deferred tax liability related to a beneficial conversion feature which was charged to additional paid-in capital in the three month period ended June 30, 2011. Of such benefit, $4.9 million, which relates to the reversal in future years of debt discount arising from the beneficial conversion feature, has been recognized as a discrete event in the nine month period. The remaining benefit resulting from the reduction in the valuation allowance ($0.8 million) which relates

to the reversal of debt discount in the current year, is being accounted for as an adjustment to the estimated annual effective tax rate and is being allocated to the current and subsequent interim periods in 2011.

At December 31, 2010, we had net operating loss carryforwards for federal income tax purposes of approximately $69.0 million available to offset future taxable income, which expire at various dates from 2024 through 2028. Our ability to utilize approximately $9.0 million of these carryforwards is limited due to changes in our ownership, as defined by federal tax regulations. In addition, utilization of the remainder of such carryforwards may be limited by the occurrence of certain further ownership changes, including changes as a result of the IPO.

Realization of the deferred tax assets is dependent on the existence of sufficient taxable income within the carryforward period, including future reversals of taxable temporary differences.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect both the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. These estimates and judgments are subject to an inherent degree of uncertainty. Our significant accounting policies are more fully described in Note 2 to our consolidated financial statements, as well as in our IPO Prospectus, which includes our audited financial statements. However, certain of our accounting policies are particularly important to the portrayal of our financial position and results of operations. In applying these critical accounting policies, our management uses its judgment in making certain assumptions to be used in making such estimates. Those estimates are based on our historical experience, the terms of existing contracts, our observation of trends in our industry and information available from other outside sources as appropriate. Accounting policies that, in their application to our business, involve the greatest amount of subjectivity by way of management judgments and estimates are those relating to valuation of goodwill, identified intangibles and other long-lived assets, including business combinations and legal contingencies.

Valuation of Goodwill, Identified Intangibles and Other Long-lived Assets

We test goodwill and intangible assets for impairment in accordance with authoritative guidance. We also test property, plant and equipment for impairment in accordance with authoritative guidance. We assess goodwill, and other indefinite-lived intangible assets at least annually, or more frequently when circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable. Factors we consider important and which could trigger an impairment review include the following:

•

a significant decline in actual or projected revenue;

•

a significant decline in performance of certain acquired companies relative to our original projections;

•

an excess of our net book value over our market value;

•

a significant decline in our operating results relative to our operating forecasts;

•

significant change in the manner of our use of acquired assets or the strategy for our overall business;

•

a significant decrease in the market value of an asset;

•

a shift in technology demands and development; and

•

a significant turnover in key management or other personnel.

When we determine that the carrying value of goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets and other long-lived assets may not be recoverable based upon the existence of one or more of the above indicators of impairment, we measure any impairment using a blended analysis of the present value of discounted cash flows and the market valuation approach. The discounted cash flow model uses the present values of estimated future cash flows. We use a discount rate determined by our management to be commensurate with the risk inherent in our current business model. Considerable management judgment is necessary to evaluate the impact of operating and external economic factors in estimating our future cash flows. The assumptions we use in our evaluations include projections of growth

rates and profitability, our estimated working capital needs, as well as our weighted average cost of capital. The market valuation approach indicates the fair value of a reporting unit based on a comparison to comparable publicly traded firms and acquired companies in similar businesses. Estimates used in the market value approach include the identification of similar companies with comparable business factors. Changes in economic and operating conditions impacting the assumptions we made could result in additional goodwill impairment in future periods. If the carrying value of a reporting unit exceeds its fair value, the goodwill of that reporting unit is potentially impaired. At this point we proceed to a step two analysis, wherein we measure the excess, if any, of the carrying value of a reporting unit’s goodwill over its implied fair value, and record the impairment loss indicated.

Indefinite-lived intangible assets consist primarily of acquired domain names and trademarks. We measure the fair value of these assets using the relief from royalty method. This method assumes that the domain names and trademarks have value to the extent their owner is relieved from paying royalties for the benefits received. We estimate the future revenues for the associated names and trademarks, the appropriate royalty rate and the weighted average cost of capital.

We completed our annual impairment testing of goodwill, domain names, and trademarks as of November 30, 2010 and December 31, 2010, with the assistance of an independent valuation firm.

In 2010, 2009 and 2008, a trademark impairment loss of approximately $4.7 million, $4.0 million and $14.9 million, respectively, was recognized related to our entertainment segment. Such loss, which is included in impairment of other intangible assets in the 2010, 2009 and 2008 consolidated statement of operations, resulted due to the estimated fair value of certain trademarks being less than their carrying value. We had impairment charges related to goodwill of approximately $6.8 million in 2008 related to our internet segment and $2.8 million related to our entertainment segment in 2008. These losses were attributable to downward revisions of earnings forecasted for future years and an increase in the discount rate due to an increase in the perceived risk of our business prospects related to negative global economic conditions and increased competition.

In 2010, no impairment was found with respect to the goodwill of the internet segment. The analysis and assessment of the assets in this segment indicated that no impairment was required as the fair values exceeded the recorded carrying values. Although we believe our assumptions are reasonable, different assumptions or changes in the future may result in different conclusions and expose us to impairment charges in the future. The fair value of our Internet reporting units exceeded each of their carrying values by more than 100%. Given this large difference, very sizable changes would be needed to the assumptions in order for the carrying value to exceed fair value.

While our Company has experienced a decline in its market value since December 31, 2010, and this decline is a known uncertainty with respect to our goodwill valuation, the Company’s market value remains significantly above its net book value. Due to this fact, and the relative stability since December 31, 2010 of all of the other important factors noted above, we have not undertaken a further impairment review.

We have acquired the stock or specific assets of certain companies from 2006 through 2007 some of which were considered to be business acquisitions. Under the purchase method of accounting then in effect, the cost, including transaction costs, were allocated to the underlying net assets, based on their respective estimated fair values. The excess of the purchase price over the estimated fair values of identifiable net assets acquired was recorded as goodwill.

Intangible assets which resulted from the acquisition were recorded at estimated fair value at the date of acquisition. Identifiable intangible assets are comprised mainly of studio and service contracts, domain names, customer lists and a non-compete agreement. In addition, purchase accounting requires deferred revenue be restated to estimated cost incurred to service the liability in the future, plus a reasonable margin.

The judgments made in determining the estimated fair value of assets and liabilities acquired and the expected useful life assigned to each class of assets can significantly impact net income.

As with the annual testing described above, determining the fair value of certain assets and liabilities acquired is subjective in nature and often involves the use of significant estimates and assumptions.

In our impairment testing, our forecasts of future performance, the discount rates used in discounted cash flow analysis and comparable company comparisons are all subjective in nature and a change in one or more of the factors could have a material change in the results of such testing and our financial results.

Legal Contingencies

We are currently involved in certain legal proceedings, as discussed in Note 16 to our condensed consolidated financial statements. To the extent that a loss related to a contingency is probable and can reasonably be estimated, we accrue an estimate of that loss. Because of the uncertainties related to both the amount or range of loss on certain pending litigation and arbitration, we may be unable to make a reasonable estimate of the liability that could result from an unfavorable outcome of such matters. As additional information becomes available, we will assess the potential liability related to our pending matters and make, or if necessary revise, our estimates. Such changes in our estimates of the potential liability could materially impact our results of operations and financial position.

Segment Information

We divide our business into two reportable segments: internet, which consists of social networking, live interactive video, premium content and social commerce websites; and entertainment, which consists of studio production and distribution, licensing and publishing. Certain corporate expenses are not allocated to segments. The following table presents our results of operations for the periods indicated for our reportable segments:

	Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2011			2010
Net revenue
Internet	$	233,319		$	241,476
Entertainment		16,308			16,014
Total		249,627			257,490
Cost of revenue
Internet		68,547			75,568
Entertainment		11,259			9,222
Total		79,806			84,790
Gross profit
Internet		164,772			165,908
Entertainment		5,049			6,792
Total		169,821			172,700
Income (loss) from operations
Internet		59,619			52,149
Entertainment		(227	)		2,234
Unallocated corporate		(7,011	)		(4,080	)
Total	$	52,381		$	50,303

The following table presents our results of operations for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008 for our reportable segments:

	Year Ended December 31,
	2010		2009		2008
	(in thousands)
Net revenue
Internet	$	321,605	$	306,213	$	306,129
Entertainment		24,392		21,479		24,888
Total		345,997		327,692		331,017
Cost of revenue
Internet		97,959		78,627		81,815
Entertainment		12,531		13,070		14,699
Total		110,490		91,697		96,514
Gross profit
Internet		223,646		227,586		224,314
Entertainment		11,861		8,409		10,189
Total		235,507		235,995		234,503

	Year Ended December 31,
	2010			2009			2008
	(in thousands)
Income (loss) from operations
Internet	$	76,142		$	64,962		$	34,345
Entertainment		1,140			(439	)		(17,748	)
Unallocated corporate		(5,547	)		(6,128	)		(9,488	)
Total	$	71,735		$	58,395		$	7,109

Internet Segment Historical Operating Data

The following table presents certain key business metrics for our adult websites, general audience websites and live interactive video websites for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010.

	Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2011			2010
Adult Websites
New members		29,035,924			28,636,551
Beginning subscribers		950,705			940,444
New subscribers⁽¹⁾		1,210,111			1,402,378
Terminations		1,311,149			1,363,003
Ending subscribers		849,667			979,819
Conversion of members to subscribers		4.2	%		4.9	%
Churn		16.2	%		15.8	%
ARPU	$	20.24		$	20.20
CPGA	$	43.55		$	49.11
Average lifetime net revenue per subscriber	$	81.51		$	78.99
Net revenue (in millions)	$	164.0		$	174.6
General Audience Websites
New members		4,931,713			7,321,237
Beginning subscribers		53,194			57,426
New subscribers		69,997			89,396
Terminations		81,716			89,209
Ending subscribers		41,475			57,613
Conversion of members to subscribers		1.4	%		1.2	%
Churn		19.2	%		17.2	%
ARPU	$	19.90		$	20.33
CPGA	$	29.03		$	29.80
Average lifetime net revenue per subscriber	$	74.71		$	88.20
Net revenue (in millions)	$	8.5		$	10.5
Live Interactive Video Websites
Total minutes		25,991,342			26,370,149
Average revenue per minute	$	2.33		$	2.13
Net revenue (in millions)	$	60.7		$	56.3

(1)

New subscribers are subscribers who have paid subscription fees to one of our websites during the period indicated in the table but who were not subscribers in the immediately prior period. Members who previously were subscribers, but discontinued their subscriptions either by notifying us of their decisions to discontinue or allowing their subscriptions to lapse by failing to pay their subscription fees, are considered new subscribers when they become subscribers again at any point after their previous subscriptions ended. If a current subscriber to one of our websites becomes a subscriber to another one of our websites, such new subscription would also be counted as a new subscriber since such subscriber would be paying the full subscription fee for each subscription. Historically the Adult websites included subscribers for only our Adult Social Networking websites. In the quarter ended September 30, 2011, management determined that those members who pay for subscriptions to one or more of our premium content adult sites should also be included in the Adult websites of the Internet segment. Historical periods have been restated to reflect this change.

The following table presents certain key business metrics for our adult social networking websites, general audience social networking websites and live interactive video websites for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008.

	Year Ended December 31,
	2010			2009			2008
Adult Social Networking Websites
New members		38,216,689			22,461,322			20,738,807
Beginning subscribers		916,005			896,211			919,146
New subscribers⁽¹⁾		1,771,837			1,776,916			1,935,533
Terminations		1,759,528			1,757,122			1,958,468
Ending subscribers		928,314			916,005			896,211
Conversion of members to subscribers		4.6	%		7.9	%		9.3	%
Churn		16.0	%		16.3	%		17.8	%
ARPU	$	20.47		$	20.73		$	22.28
CPGA	$	48.43		$	47.24		$	51.26
Average lifetime net revenue per subscriber	$	79.45		$	79.64		$	74.22
Net revenue⁽²⁾ (in millions)	$	226.6		$	225.4		$	242.7
General Audience Social Networking Websites
New members		8,985,965			8,994,757			11,221,993
Beginning subscribers		57,431			68,647			85,893
New subscribers⁽¹⁾		114,709			116,608			174,290
Terminations		118,942			127,824			191,536
Ending subscribers		53,198			57,431			68,647
Conversion of members to subscribers		1.3	%		1.3	%		1.6	%
Churn		17.3	%		15.5	%		18.6	%
ARPU	$	20.72		$	18.05		$	19.21
CPGA	$	29.04		$	41.61		$	36.68
Average lifetime net revenue per subscriber	$	91.02		$	74.71		$	66.70
Net revenue⁽²⁾ (in millions)	$	13.8		$	13.7		$	17.8
Live Interactive Video Websites
Total minutes		19,566,551			17,293,702			19,101,202
Average revenue per minute	$	3.90		$	3.49		$	2.87
Net revenue⁽²⁾ (in millions)	$	76.3		$	60.4		$	54.9

(1)

See the previous Footnote 1 on page 8 3 .

(2)

Net revenue for the year ended December 31, 2008 includes the adding back of $19.2 million due to a non-recurring purchase accounting adjustment that required deferred revenue at the date of acquisition of Various to be recorded at fair value. To provide meaningful comparisons between the years shown, management believes that the historical results of Various are reflective of our future results.

The table above includes the average lifetime net revenue per subscriber and the number of subscribers for the periods shown. While we monitor many statistics in the overall management of our business, we believe that average lifetime net revenue per subscriber and the number of subscribers are particularly helpful metrics for gaining a meaningful understanding of our business as they provide an indication of total revenue and profit generated from our base of subscribers inclusive of affiliate commissions and advertising costs required to generate new subscriptions.

While we monitor trends in visitors, conversion rates of visitors to subscribers, or paid users does not provide a meaningful understanding of our business. Our raw data of visitors is subject to duplicate entries from visitors using multiple user names and e-mail addresses or accessing our websites as a member on one website and as a subscriber on another website. We use statistically significant samples and measurements of visitor data that allow our management to make evaluations based on such data.

There is the possibility that a new subscriber reflected on the table above was either a discontinued or lapsed prior subscriber or is also a current subscriber on a different FriendFinder website. We do not identify which subscribers were discontinued or lapsed subscribers or which subscribers are existing subscribers on a different FriendFinder website. Furthermore, a subscriber may come to one of our websites using multiple user names, e-mail addresses or credit cards, and consequently might be double counted. We do not quantify the number of new

subscribers attributable to the sources listed above because we believe our current method provides the most relevant measurement of our business.

Churn is the most direct measurement of the value our subscribers get for the price we charge. We strive to provide our subscribers with a positive user experience, minimize technical difficulties and provide a competitively priced service. Our activities and efforts seek to lower churn rates as much as possible. Historically churn was calculated by dividing the quotient of terminations in the period over total subscribers at the beginning of the period by the number of months in the period. In the quarter ended September 30, 2011, Management determined that using average subscribers in the period as opposed to total subscribers at the beginning of the period was a better representation of our churn. Historical periods have been restated to reflect this change.

With respect to our live interactive video websites, our goal is to maximize the number of minutes purchased and the revenue from those purchased minutes. Paid users are a subset of our members, and may also be subscribers on one or one of our other websites, who purchase products or services on a pay-by-usage basis on our live interactive video websites. The number of paid users is less important than the number and cost of the minutes purchased. Thus, we monitor the revenue from paid users, the number of minutes purchased in any period and the average value of the minutes purchased, all of which are presented in the table above. Historically, minutes were calculated by capturing the number of minutes of actual video footage that was watched. In the quarter ended September 30, 2011, Management determined that calculating minutes based on the number of per-minute charges applied to paid users accounts was a better representation of the business. Historical periods have been restated to reflect this change.

Our results of operations related to our adult and general audience websites, as distinguished from the live interactive video websites discussed above, reflects the interaction of the conversion of members to subscribers, the churn of subscribers, and the average value of purchased products and services. A negative movement in any one of these items may be offset by a positive movement in another. For more information see the sections in this prospectus entitled “— Results of Operations — Internet Segment Historical Operating Data for the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2011 as Compared to the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2010.”

Results of Operations

Segments and Periods Presented

We operate in two segments, internet and entertainment. Our strategy is largely focused on the expansion of our internet segment. As a result, we expect our entertainment segment to become a decreasing percentage of our total net revenues. We expect our entertainment segment to continue to account for less than 10.0% and 5.0% of our net revenue and gross profit, respectively, for the next five years.

Our entertainment segment has higher fixed and variable costs associated with the business resulting in historically lower gross profit margins than our internet segment. We expect gross profit margins in our entertainment segment to continue to vary but remain within its historical range. We expect the internet gross profit percentage in future years to be consistent with the gross profit percentage in 2010.

We have provided a discussion of our results of operations on a consolidated basis and have also provided certain detailed discussions for each of our segments. In order to provide a meaningful discussion of our ongoing business, we have provided a discussion of the following:

•

our consolidated results of operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2010;

•

an analysis of internet segment operating data which are key to an understanding of our operating results and strategies for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 as compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2010;

•

our consolidated results of operations for the year ended December 31, 2010 compared to the year ended December 31, 2009;

•

our consolidated results of operations for the year ended December 31, 2009 compared to the year ended December 31, 2008.

•

an analysis of internet segment operating data which are key to an understanding of our operating results and strategies for the year ended December 31, 2010 as compared to the year ended December 31, 2009, and for the year ended December 31, 2009 as compared to the year ended December 31, 2008.

The following table presents our historical operating results as a percentage of our net revenue for the periods indicated:

	Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2011			2010
Net revenue		100.0	%		100.0	%
Cost of revenue		32.0			32.9
Gross profit		68.0			67.1
Operating expenses:
Product development		4.8			3.6
Selling and marketing		9.1			11.9
General and administrative		27.0			23.4
Amortization of acquired intangibles and software		4.8			7.3
Depreciation and other amortization		1.3			1.4
Total operating expenses		47.0			47.6
Income from operations		21.0			19.5
Interest expense, net of interest income		(26.1	)		(26.9	)
Interest and penalty related to VAT liability not charged to customers		(0.6	)		(0.7	)
Foreign exchange gain (loss) principally related to VAT liability not charged to customers		(0.6	)		0.2
(Loss)/gain on liability related to warrants		0.2			0.2
Loss on extinguishment of debt		(2.9	)		—
Other non-operating (expense) income, net		(1.6	)		0.0
Loss before income tax (benefit)		(10.6	)		(7.7	)
Income tax (benefit)		(2.2	)		(0.1	)
Net loss		(8.4	)%		(7.6	)%

	Year Ended December 31,
	2010			2009			2008
Net revenue		100.0	%		100.0	%		100.0	%
Cost of revenue		31.9			28.0			29.2
Gross profit		68.1			72.0			70.8
Operating expenses:
Product development		3.7			4.1			4.4
Selling and marketing		10.8			13.1			17.9
General and administrative		23.1			23.5			26.7
Amortization of acquired intangibles and software		7.1			10.8			11.0
Depreciation and other amortization		1.3			1.5			1.3
Impairment of goodwill		—			—			2.9
Impairment of other intangible assets		1.4			1.2			4.5
Total operating expenses		47.4			54.2			68.7
Income from operations		20.7			17.8			2.1
Interest expense, net of interest income		(25.6	)		(28.1	)		(24.3	)
Other finance expenses		(1.3	)		—			—

	Year Ended December 31,
	2010			2009			2008
Interest and penalty related to VAT liability not charged to customers		(0.7	)%		(1.3	)%		(2.5	)%
Net loss on extinguishment and modification of debt		(2.1	)		(2.2	)		—
Foreign exchange (gain) loss principally related to VAT liability not charged to customers		0.2			(1.7	)		4.6
Gain on elimination of liability for United Kingdom VAT not charged to customers		—			0.5			—
Gain on settlement of liability related to VAT not charged to customers		—			0.1			0.8
Gain on liability related to warrants		0.0			0.8			—
Other non-operating expense net		(3.8	)		(0.1	)		(0.1	)
Loss before income tax benefit		(12.6	)		(14.2	)		(19.4	)
Income tax benefit		0.1			1.6			5.5
Net loss		(12.5	)%		(12.6	)%		(13.9	)%

Nine Months Ended September 30, 2011 as Compared to the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2010

Net Revenue. Net revenue for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010 was $249.6 million and $257.5 million, respectively, representing a decrease of $7.9 million or 3.1%. Internet revenue for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010 was $233.3 million and $241.5 million, respectively, representing a decrease of $8.2 million or 3.4%. Entertainment revenue for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010 was $16.3 million and $16.0 million, respectively, representing an increase of $0.3 million or 1.9%.

The decrease in internet revenue was primarily attributable to a decrease in our social networking websites revenue of $12.9 million, or 7.1% due to a decrease in traffic to our websites mainly in Europe as described below in cost of revenue. The above decline was offset by an increase in our live interactive video websites revenue of $4.4 million, or 7.8%, due mainly to more effective marketing campaigns as well as a $1.9 million charge to our customers’ e-wallets for non-use. In addition, our newly acquired social commerce websites had revenue of $0.1 million. Negative global economic conditions (including, but not limited to, an increase in credit card companies denying transactions) affected our revenue as well.

Internet revenue for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 was comprised of 72.3% relating to our social networking websites, 26.0% relating to our live interactive video websites, 1.6% relating to our premium content websites and 0.1% related to our social commerce websites, as compared to 75.2% for our social networking websites, 23.3% for our live interactive video websites and 1.5% for our premium content websites for the same period in 2010.

Entertainment revenue for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 was $16.3 million as compared to $16.0 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010, representing an increase of $0.3 million or 1.9%. The increase in entertainment revenue was primarily due to an increase in our in our video entertainment revenue of $1.4 million related to new video distribution deals. The above increase was offset by a decrease in our publication revenue of $0.8 million as a result of a decline in the number of magazines sold from 3.5 million to 2.4 million issues. We also had a decrease in our licensing revenue of $0.3 million due to less licensing activity.

Entertainment revenue for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 was comprised of 45.6% relating to magazine publishing, 44.3% relating to broadcasting and 10.1% relating to licensing, as compared to 51.6% for magazine publishing, 36.1% for broadcasting and 12.3% for licensing for the same period in 2010.

Cost of Revenue. Cost of revenue for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010 was $79.8 million and $84.8 million, respectively, representing a decrease of $5.0 million or 5.9%. During the nine months ended September 30, 2010, we significantly increased our pay-per-order payouts to affiliates, which caused some of our affiliates to switch from a revenue share basis to a pay-per-order basis. The increase in pay-per-order payouts caused an increase in traffic to our websites, resulting in increased revenue and a corresponding increase in our affiliate expenses. We did not have the extent of such increases in our pay-per-order payouts for the nine months ended

September 30, 2011 as well as we had a decrease in revenue, and as a result, had a reduction in our affiliate expenses of $7.9 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2011 as compared to the same period in 2010. The above decrease was offset by an increase of $1.5 million in our satellite distribution costs and a $1.0 million increase in content costs for our video entertainment business due in part to the increase in revenue described above. We also had a $0.4 million increase in our content cost for our internet business. Furthermore, we had an increase in our studio and model expense of $0.4 million as a result of the increase in revenue described above.

Operating Expenses

Product Development. Product development expense for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010 was $12.1 million and $9.3 million, respectively, representing an increase of $2.8 million or 30.1%. The primary reason for the increase in product development expense was due to an increase in headcount to support new initiatives and expected growth, including both internal and outsourced labor.

Selling and Marketing. Selling and marketing expense for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010 was $22.7 million and $30.6 million, respectively, representing a decrease of $7.9 million or 25.8%. The decrease in selling and marketing expense was primarily due to a $9.6 million decrease in our ad buy expenses for our internet segment over the period, from $26.2 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 to $16.6 million for the same period in 2011. The largest single sales and marketing expense item is our ad buy expense, the cost of purchasing key word searches from major search engines. The above increase in selling and marketing expense was primarily due to a $1.4 million increase in wages and benefits due to increased headcount as we realigned certain departments to more accurately reflect where the employees were providing their services. In addition we also had other decreases of $0.3 million in general advertising expenses.

General and Administrative. General and administrative expense for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010 was $67.5 million and $60.1 million, respectively, representing an increase of $7.4 million or 12.3%. The increase in general and administrative expense is primarily due to a $3.3 million increase in legal expenses, mainly as a result of $2.4 million related to our Broadstream arbitration case. Furthermore, we had an increase in our salaries, wages and benefits of $3.3 million in 2011 as a result of additional headcount. We also had an increase in our professional and consulting expense of $1.5 million in 2011, relating mainly to our registration statement for certain of our indebtedness. Lastly, we had a $2.6 million charge for compensation expense related to our IPO in May 2011. For further information, see “Note 13 — Stock Compensation Expense” in our consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this prospectus. The above were offset by a decrease in merchant processing expenses of $3.0 million due to lower costs to process our transactions in 2011. We also had a net decrease in other general and administrative expenses of $0.3 million.

Amortization of Acquired Intangibles and Software. Amortization of acquired intangibles and software for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010 was $11.9 million and $18.8 million, respectively. The decrease was primarily due to a portion of the acquired intangibles becoming fully amortized. The decrease was offset in part by newly acquired intangibles and software as during the three months ended September 30, 2011 we acquired PerfectMatch, a leading social networking website, as well as JigoCity, a leading social commerce website.

Depreciation and Other Amortization. Depreciation and other amortization expense for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010 was $3.3 and $3.6 million. We continue to purchase additional fixed assets, while certain of our assets are becoming fully depreciated.

Interest Expense, Net of Interest Income. Interest expense for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010 was $65.1 million and $69.1 million, respectively, representing a decrease of $4.0 million or 5.8%. The decrease was due mainly to debt payments during 2011, including approximately $39.5 million of debt paid off with our IPO proceeds.

Interest and Penalties Related to VAT Liability not Charged to Customers. Effective July 1, 2003, as a result of a change in the law in the European Union, VAT was required to be collected from customers in connection with their use of internet services in the European Union countries. A provision and related liability have been recorded for interest and penalties related to VAT not charged to customers and failure to file tax returns based on the applicable law of each relevant country in the European Union.

Interest related to VAT liability not charged to customers for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 was $1.4 million as compared to $1.7 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010. The decrease in interest related to VAT not charged to customers is due to VAT settlements with additional countries. We continue to record interest expense in the applicable unsettled European Union countries in which we have an estimated $40.3 million of unremitted VAT liability as of September 30, 2011.

Foreign Exchange (Loss)/Gain Principally Related to VAT Liability not Charged to Customers. Foreign exchange loss principally related to VAT not charged to customers for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 was $1.5 million as compared to a gain of $0.4 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010. The loss for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 is primarily related to the increase in the U.S. dollar amount of the VAT liability assumed from Various which was denominated in Euros due to the weakening of the U.S. dollar. The gain for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 is primarily related to the strengthening of the U.S. dollar against the Euro.

Gain on Liability Related to Warrants. Gain on liability related to warrants for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 was $0.4 million as compared to a gain of $0.4 million for the same period in 2010. The liability related to the 501,663 warrants issued in August 2005 was established as a result of new authoritative guidance becoming effective for us as of January 1, 2009. The remaining unexercised warrants were terminated in conjunction with our IPO in May 2011. For further information, see “Note 10 — Liability Related to Warrants” in our consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this prospectus.

Loss on Extinguishment of Debt. Loss on extinguishment of debt for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 was $7.3 million. This expense was related to write-off of deferred costs and discount and a prepayment penalty due to our redeeming approximately $37.8 million of New First Lien Notes and approximately $1.7 million of Cash Pay Second Lien Notes in connection with proceeds received from our IPO in May 2011. There was no loss on extinguishment of debt for the nine months ended September 30, 2010.

Other Non-operating (Expense)/Income, Net. Other non-operating expense for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 was $3.9 million as compared to income of $5,000 for the same period in 2010. The expense in 2011 was primarily due to our settlement of the Broadstream arbitration case for $15.0 million, which required us to record an additional $5.0 million of expense. For further information, see “Note 16—Contingencies” in our consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this prospectus. The above expenses were offset with life insurance proceeds related to the death of the original founder of Penthouse, Robert Guccione in the amount of $1.1 million. The remainder of the other expense in 2011 and 2010, respectively, was due mainly to miscellaneous gains and losses.

Income Tax Benefit. Income tax benefit for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 was $5.5 million as compared to a benefit of $0.2 million for the same period on 2010. The tax benefit in the nine month period ended September 30, 2011, relates to a reduction in the valuation allowance resulting from the recording of an approximately $5.7 million deferred tax liability related to a beneficial conversion feature which was charged to additional paid-in capital in the nine month period ended September 30, 2011. A larger tax benefit related to pre-tax loss was not recognized for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010 due to an anticipated increase in the valuation allowance against deferred tax assets at each year end.

Net Loss. Net loss for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010 was $21.0 million and $19.5 million, respectively, representing an increase of $1.5 million or 7.7%. The larger loss in 2011 was primarily due to a net increase of $8.9 million in non-operating expenses, offset by an increase from operations of $2.1 million and an increase in the income tax benefit of $5.3 million.

Year Ended December 31, 2010 as Compared to the Year Ended December 31, 2009

Net Revenue. Net revenue for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009 was $346.0 million and $327.7 million, respectively, representing an increase of $18.3 million or 5.6%. Internet revenue for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009 was $321.6 million and $306.2 million, respectively, representing an increase of $15.4 million or 5.0%. Entertainment revenue for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009 was $24.4 million and $21.5 million, respectively, representing an increase of $2.9 million or 13.5%.

The increase in internet revenue was primarily attributable to an increase in our live interactive video websites of $15.9 million, or 26.3%, due to more effective marketing campaigns. In addition, we had an increase in our social networking websites revenue of $0.6 million, or 0.3% due to more effective marketing campaigns and increased features available on our websites. Negative global economic conditions (including, but not limited to, an increase in credit card companies denying transactions) affected the extent of our increases. Furthermore, we had a decrease in revenue for our premium content websites of $1.1 million, or 18.9%, due mainly to a decrease in traffic and negative global economic conditions.

Internet revenue for the year ended December 31, 2010 was comprised of 74.8% relating to our social networking websites, 23.7% relating to our live interactive video websites and 1.5% relating to our premium content websites, as compared to 78.3% for our social networking websites, 19.7% for our live interactive video websites and 2.0% for our premium content websites for the same period in 2009.

Entertainment revenue for the year ended December 31, 2010 was $24.4 million as compared to $21.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2009, representing an increase of $2.9 million or 13.5%.

Entertainment revenue for the year ended December 31, 2010 was comprised of 44.7% relating to magazine publishing, 44.6% relating to broadcasting and 10.7% relating to licensing, as compared to 56.9% for magazine publishing, 30.0% for broadcasting and 13.1% for licensing for the same period in 2009.

The increase in entertainment revenue was primarily due to an increase in our video entertainment revenue of $4.5 million due mainly to our recognition of a $3.3 million prepayment due to one of our exclusive agents prematurely terminating a broadcast contract. We also had an increase in our entertainment revenue of $1.2 million due to entering into new video contracts. The above increase was offset by a decrease in publication revenue of $1.3 million as a result of a decline in the number of magazines sold from 4.3 million to 3.5 million issues, as well as a $0.2 million decrease in our licensing revenue.

Cost of Revenue. Cost of revenue for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009 was $110.5 million and $91.7 million, respectively, representing an increase of $18.8 million or 20.5%. The increase in cost of revenue was primarily attributable to an increase in affiliate commission expense of $14.5 million, from $56.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2009 to $71.2 million for the same period in 2010. The increase was mainly due to affiliates switching from a revenue share basis to a pay-per-order basis, as well as an increase in the live interactive video websites activity. The increase in cost of revenue was also due to an increase in our studio and model payouts of $5.9 million as a result of increased revenue for our live interactive video websites and a change in the way we compensate our studios and models. Included in 2009 was a $2.0 million refund related to affiliate commissions, as well as a $2.0 million reduction for affiliates that didn’t comply with certain contractual requirements of our affiliate agreement. There were no such refunds or reductions for the same period in 2010. The above increases were offset by a decrease in publishing costs of $1.9 million that was related to the decrease in publishing revenue discussed previously. We also had a decrease in our premium content costs of $0.9 million due to the decrease in premium content revenue discussed previously.

Operating Expenses

Product Development. Product development expense for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009 was $12.8 million and $13.5 million, respectively, representing a decrease of $0.7 million or 5.2%. The primary reason for the decrease in product development expense was due to a decrease in headcount as we reallocated technology resources.

Selling and Marketing. Selling and marketing expense for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009 was $37.3 million and $42.9 million, respectively, representing a decrease of $5.6 million or 13.1%. The decrease in selling and marketing expense was primarily due to a $4.5 million decrease in our ad buy expenses for our internet segment over the period, from $36.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2009 to $31.6 million for the same period in 2010. The largest single sales and marketing expense item is our ad buy expense, the cost of purchasing key word searches from major search engines. The decrease was also due to a $0.9 million reduction in general advertising expenses as well as a $0.2 million reduction in salaries and benefits as a result of lower headcount.

General and Administrative. General and administrative expense for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009 was $79.9 million and $76.9 million, respectively, representing an increase of $3.0 million or 3.9%. The

increase in general and administrative expense is primarily due to a $3.5 million increase in merchant processing expenses due to higher costs to process our transactions. There was also an increase of $2.0 million in our general corporate expenses. The above increase was offset by a decrease in legal expense of $1.4 million primarily attributable to significantly less usage of legal firms in the year ended December 31, 2010 as compared to the same period in the prior year. In the year ended December 31, 2009, we also had a $2.7 million reimbursement related to a prior lawsuit in which the sellers of Various repaid a portion of the settlement payment and litigation expenses to us pursuant to the acquisition agreement for Various. There was no such reimbursement for the same period in 2010. There was also a decrease of $1.1 million in our internet expenses due to a reduction in cost for services.

Amortization of Acquired Intangibles and Software. Amortization of acquired intangibles and software for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009 was $24.5 million and $35.5 million, respectively. The decrease was primarily due to a portion of the acquired intangibles becoming fully amortized during 2010. We have had no significant acquisitions since we acquired Various, Inc. on December 6, 2007.

Depreciation and Other Amortization. Depreciation and other amortization expense for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009 was $4.7 million and $4.9 million, respectively, representing a decrease of $0.2 million or 4.1%. The decrease in depreciation and other amortization is primarily related to certain assets becoming fully depreciated, offset by the purchase of additional fixed assets.

Impairment of Other Intangible Assets. Impairment of other intangible assets for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009 was $4.7 million and $4.0 million, respectively, representing an increase of $0.7 million or 17.5%. The losses for 2010 and 2009 were attributable to the entertainment segment and due to the estimated fair value of trademarks being less than their carrying value.

Interest Expense, Net of Interest Income. Interest expense for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009 was $88.5 million and $92.1 million, respectively, representing a decrease of $3.6 million or 3.9%. The decrease was due mainly to debt payments during the year ended December 31, 2010. The above decrease was offset by additional original issue discount, or OID, amortization on our first lien debt from excess cash flow payments and an increase in our Subordinated Convertible Notes of $38.0 million due to the elimination of the United Kingdom VAT liability in 2009 described below.

Other Finance Expenses. Other finance expenses for the year ended December 31, 2010 were due to debt restructuring costs of $4.6 million related to our New Financing that was completed in October 2010. We expensed the third party fees related to the Senior Secured Notes which were determined to be not substantially different from the First Lien Notes and Second Lien Notes for which they were exchanged, and therefore they are not accounted for as extinguished debt (See “Net Loss on Extinguishment and Modification of Debt” below). We had no such comparable costs in the same period for 2009.

Interest and penalties related to VAT liability not charged to customers for the year ended December 31, 2010 was $2.3 million as compared to $4.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2009. The decrease in interest and penalties related to VAT not charged to customers is due to VAT settlements with numerous countries. We continue to record interest expense in the applicable unsettled European Union countries in which we have an estimated $39.4 million of unremitted VAT liability.

Net Loss on Extinguishment and Modification of Debt. Loss on extinguishment and modification of debt for the year ended December 31, 2010 was $7.5 million as compared to a loss of $7.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2009. In 2010, the Company refinanced substantially all of its existing debt into Senior Secured Notes, Cash Pay Notes and Non-Cash Pay Notes. The Company determined that the Senior Secured Notes and Cash Pay Notes were substantially different than the outstanding principal amount of former Senior Secured Notes for which they were exchanged, resulting in an extinguishment of the former Senior Secured Notes. An extinguishment loss of $10.5 million was recorded for such exchange and for the former Senior Secured Notes, First Lien Notes and

Second Lien Notes redeemed for cash. Such loss includes payment of fees to lenders. The above was offset by the determination that the Old Non-Cash Pay Notes were substantially different than the non-convertible Subordinated Term Notes for which they were exchanged based on the conversion feature in the Old Non-Cash Pay Notes, resulting in a gain on extinguishment of $3.0 million related to the excess of the carrying value of the Subordinated Term Notes over the fair value of the Old Non-Cash Pay Notes for which they were exchanged.

In 2009, the loss related to the elimination of the Company’s option to convert the INI Seller Subordinated Notes (the “INI Seller Subordinated Notes”) into common stock and was attributable to the excess of the fair value of the modified notes over the carrying value of the existing notes. In addition, the loss includes the $2.3 million present value of fees to the former owners of Various aggregating $3.2 million to be paid during the period from December 2010 to the first quarter of 2013.

Foreign Exchange Gain/(Loss) Principally Related to VAT Liability not Charged to Customers. Foreign exchange gain principally related to VAT not charged to customers for the year ended December 31, 2010 was $0.6 million as compared to a loss of $5.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2009. The gain for the year ended December 31, 2010 is primarily related to the decrease in the U.S. dollar amount of the VAT liability assumed from Various which was denominated in Euros due to the strengthening of the U.S. dollar. The loss for the year ended December 31, 2009 is primarily related to the weakening of the U.S. dollar against the Euro and British Pound.

Gain on Elimination of Liability for United Kingdom VAT not Charged to Customers. Gain on elimination of liability for United Kingdom VAT not charged to customers for the year ended December 31, 2009 was $1.6 million. This gain was due to the United Kingdom taxing authority notifying us that it had reversed its previous position and that we were not subject to VAT in the United Kingdom in connection with providing internet services.

Gain on Settlement of Liability Related to VAT not Charged to Customers. Gain on settlement of liability related to VAT not charged to customers for the year ended December 31, 2009 was $0.2 million. The gain was due to VAT settlements with foreign countries in which we had recorded more liability than the actual settlement. There were no gains related to VAT liability not charged to customers in the same period for 2010.

Gain on Liability Related to Warrants. Gain on liability related to warrants for the year ended December 31, 2010 was $38,000 as compared to a gain of $2.7 million for the same period in 2009. For the year ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, the liability related to the 501,663 warrants issued in August 2005 was established as a result of new authoritative guidance becoming effective for us as of January 1, 2009. For further information, see “Note K — Liability Related to Warrants” in our consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this prospectus.

Other Non-operating Expense, Net. Other non-operating expense for the year ended December 31, 2010 was $13.2 million as compared to $0.4 million for the same period in 2009. The expense in 2010 was primarily due to a $13.0 million charge related to our lawsuit with Broadstream Capital Partners, Inc. or Broadstream. The Company entered into an agreement in 2009 to postpone litigation and paid an aggregate of $3.0 million to Broadstream during 2009 and 2010. The agreement provided that if Broadstream elected to choose arbitration as a means of resolving the dispute, the arbitration award range to Broadstream would be at least $10.0 million but would not exceed $47.0 million. As a result of Broadstream electing for arbitration in December 2010, we recognized a loss of $13.0 million as of December 31, 2010.

Income Tax Benefit. Income tax benefit for the year ended December 31, 2010 was $0.5 million as compared to a benefit of $5.3 million for the same period in 2009. The difference was due to a larger amount of net operating loss for which no tax benefit was recognized in 2010 due to an increase in the valuation allowance against deferred tax assets. The 2009 tax benefit was reduced by a write-off of a deferred tax asset.

Net Loss. Net loss for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009 was $43.2 million and $41.2 million, representing an increase of $2.0 million or 4.9%. The larger loss in 2010 was primarily due to an increase of $13.3 million from operations offset by a net increase of $10.5 million in non-operating expenses and a $4.8 million decrease in tax benefit.

Year Ended December 31, 2009 as Compared to the Year Ended December 31, 2008

Net Revenue. Net revenue for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008 was $327.7 million and $331.0 million, respectively, representing a decrease of $3.3 million or 1.0% due to the performance of our internet segment. Internet revenue for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008 remained constant at $306.2 million and $306.1

million, respectively, Entertainment revenue for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008 was $21.5 million and $24.9 million, respectively, representing a decrease of $3.4 million or 13.7%. Included above for the year ended December 31, 2008 was a reduction to Internet net revenue of $19.2 million due to a purchase accounting adjustment that required the deferred revenue to be recorded at fair value as of the day of acquisition of Various in 2007. There was no impact of purchase accounting adjustments on internet or entertainment revenue in 2009.

Without the effect of the purchase accounting adjustment, internet revenue would have been $325.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2008 as compared to $306.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2009, representing a decrease of $19.1 million or 5.9%. The decrease in revenue adjusted for purchase accounting was primarily attributable to a decrease in our social networking websites of $23.1 million, or 8.8%, due to negative global economic conditions (including, but not limited to, an increase in credit card companies denying transactions) which caused a decrease in our conversions from free members to paying subscribers. We also substantially decreased our sales and marketing expense, principally in advertising, which had a negative impact in revenue. Furthermore, we had a decrease in revenue for our premium content websites of $1.6 million, or 20.9%, due mainly to a decrease in traffic and negative global economic conditions. Those decreases were offset by an increase in revenue adjusted for purchase accounting of $5.6 million or 10.2% in our live interactive video websites due to more effective marketing campaigns.

Internet revenue for the year ended December 31, 2009 was comprised of 78.3% relating to our social networking websites, 19.7% relating to our live interactive video websites and 2.0% relating to our premium content websites, as compared to internet revenue of 80.8% for our social networking websites, 16.9% for our live interactive video websites and 2.3% for our premium content websites for the same period in 2008 adjusted for the purchase accounting adjustment.

Entertainment revenue for the year ended December 31, 2009 was $21.5 million as compared to $24.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2008, representing a decrease of $3.4 million or 13.7%. This decrease can be primarily attributed to a decline in publication revenue of $3.4 million as a result of a decline in the number of magazines sold from 6.0 million to 4.3 million issues, as well as a $0.4 million decrease in licensing revenues. The above decreases were offset by a $0.4 million increase resulting from entering into new video contracts.

Entertainment revenue for the year ended December 31, 2009 was comprised of 56.9% relating to magazine publishing, 30.0% relating to broadcasting and 13.1% relating to licensing.

The following table presents the purchase accounting related adjustments to revenue:

	Year Ended December 31,
($ in millions)	2009		2008
Net revenue	$	327.7	$	331.0
Purchase accounting adjustment		—		19.2
Adjusted revenue	$	327.7	$	350.2
Internet revenue	$	306.2	$	306.1
Purchase accounting adjustment		—		19.2
Adjusted net internet revenue		306.2		325.3
Entertainment revenue		21.5		24.9
Total adjusted revenue	$	327.7	$	350.2

Cost of Revenue. Cost of revenue for the year ended December 31, 2009 and 2008 was $91.7 million and $96.5 million, respectively, representing a decrease of $4.8 million or 5.0%. The decrease in cost of revenue was primarily attributable to a reduction in affiliate commission expense of $5.6 million, from $62.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2008 to $56.7 million for the same period in 2009. This decrease was mainly due to a decline in net internet revenue adjusted for purchase accounting attributable to marketing affiliates offset partially by a small increase in the rate at which we compensate our marketing affiliates. Included in the decrease was a $2.0 million refund related to affiliate commissions and a $2.0 million cumulative reduction for affiliates that did not comply with certain contractual requirements of our affiliate agreement.

Operating Expenses

Product Development. Product development expense for the year ended December 31, 2009 and 2008 was $13.5 million and $14.6 million, respectively, representing a decrease of $1.1 million or 7.5%. The primary reason for the decrease in product development expense was due to a decrease in headcount as we reallocated technology resources.

Selling and Marketing. Selling and marketing expense for the year ended December 31, 2009 and 2008 was $42.9 million and $59.3 million, respectively, representing a decrease of $16.4 million or 27.7%. The decrease in selling and marketing expense is primarily attributable to a $15.8 million decrease in our ad buy expenses for our internet segment over the period, from $51.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2008 to $36.1 million for the same period in 2009.

General and Administrative. General and administrative expense for the year ended December 31, 2009 and 2008 was $76.9 million and $88.3 million, respectively, representing a decrease of $11.4 million or 12.9%. The decrease in general and administrative expense is primarily due to a $6.5 million decrease in legal fees. The decrease in legal expense was primarily attributable to a $2.7 million reimbursement related to a prior lawsuit in which the Sellers repaid a portion of the settlement payment and litigation expenses to us pursuant to the acquisition agreement for Various. The decrease in general and administrative expense was also due to a decrease in temporary help expenses of $1.4 million and in consulting and professional fees of $2.7 million due to the majority of integration work being completed by March 31, 2008; and a $2.5 million decrease in other corporate expenses. The decreases were offset by a $2.6 million increase in our salaries, wages and benefits to help enhance our corporate infrastructure.

Amortization of Acquired Intangibles and Software. Amortization of acquired intangibles and software for the year ended December 31, 2009 and 2008 was $35.5 million and $36.3 million, respectively. The decrease relates to some of the acquired intangibles becoming fully amortized during 2009. We have had no significant acquisitions during 2009 and 2008.

Depreciation and Other Amortization. Depreciation and other amortization expense for the year ended December 31, 2009 and 2008 was $4.9 million and $4.5 million, respectively, representing an increase of $0.4 million or 8.9%. The increase in depreciation and other amortization is primarily related to the purchase of additional fixed assets.

Impairment of Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets. Impairment of goodwill and other intangible assets for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008 was $4.0 million and $14.9 million, respectively, representing a decrease of $10.9 million or 73.2%. The losses for 2009 and 2008 were attributable to the entertainment segment and due to the estimated fair value of trademarks being less than their carrying value.

Other Income (Expense)

Interest Expense, Net of Interest Income. Interest expense for the year ended December 31, 2009 and 2008 was $92.1 million and $80.5 million, respectively, representing an increase of $11.6 million or 14.4%. The increase was due mainly to additional original issue discount, or OID, amortization on our first lien debt from excess cash flow payments and an increase in our Subordinated Convertible Notes of $38.0 million due to the elimination of the United Kingdom VAT liability described below. Those increases were offset by debt payments during the year ended December 31, 2009.

Interest and penalties related to VAT not charged to customers for the year ended December 31, 2009 was $4.2 million as compared to $8.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2008. The decrease in interest and penalties related to VAT not charged to customers is due to VAT settlements with numerous countries. We continue to record interest expense in the applicable unsettled European Union countries in which we have an estimated $43.1 million of unremitted VAT liability.

Net Loss on Extinguishment and Modification of Debt. Loss on extinguishment and modification of debt was $7.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2009. The debt modification was to eliminate the Company’s option to convert the INI Seller Subordinated Notes into common stock and was attributable to the excess of the fair value of the modified notes over the carrying value of the existing notes. In addition, the Company will pay fees to the previous owners of Various aggregating $3.2 million during the period from December 31, 2010 to the first quarter of 2013, of which the Company expensed the $2.3 million present value of the $3.2 million. There was no modification of debt in 2008.

Foreign Exchange Gain/(Loss) Principally Related to VAT Liability not Charged to Customers. Foreign exchange loss on VAT not charged to customers for the year ended December 31, 2009 was $5.5 million as compared to a gain of $15.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2008. The loss for the year ended December 31, 2009 is primarily related to the increase in the U.S. dollar amount of the VAT liability assumed from Various which was denominated in Euros and, until June 2009 when the United Kingdom VAT liability was eliminated, British Pounds due to the weakening of the U.S. dollar against these currencies.

Gain on Settlement of Liability Related to VAT not Charged to Customers. Gain on settlement of liability related to VAT not charged to customers for the year ended December 31, 2009 was $0.2 million as compared to $2.7 million for the same period in 2008. The gains were due to VAT settlements with foreign countries in which we had recorded more liability than the actual settlement.

Gain on Liability Related to Warrants. Gain on liability related to warrants for the year ended December 31, 2009 was $2.7 million. There was no gain or loss for the year ended December 31, 2008 as the liability related to the 501,666 warrants issued in August 2005 was established as a result of new authoritative guidance becoming effective for us as of January 1, 2009. For further information, see “Note K — Liability Related to Warrants” in our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements and related notes for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008 included elsewhere in this prospectus.

Other Non-operating Expenses, Net. Other non-operating expenses for the year ended December 31, 2009 was $0.4 million as compared to income of $0.2 million for the same period in 2008. The other income and expense in 2008 and 2009, respectively, were due mainly to miscellaneous gains and losses.

Income Tax Benefit. Income tax benefit for the year ended December 31, 2009 and 2008 was $5.3 million and $18.2 million, respectively. The decrease was mainly due to the smaller loss before income tax benefit in 2009 and additional discrete items mainly related to the United Kingdom VAT liability elimination in 2009 as compared to 2008.

Net Loss. Net loss for the year ended December 31, 2009 and 2008 was $41.2 million and $46.0 million, representing a decrease of $4.8 million or 10.4%. The decrease was due to the factors listed above.

Internet Segment Historical Operating Data for the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2011 as Compared to the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2010

Adult Websites

Subscribers. There were 849,667 total ending subscribers on September 30, 2011 as compared to 979,819 total ending subscribers on September 30, 2010, representing a net decrease of 130,152 or 13.3% over the last twelve months. The decrease was primarily driven by lower conversion rates of members to subscribers and the higher churn in the twelve months ended September 30, 2011 as compared to the twelve months ended September 30, 2010. However, as Management identifies areas of weakness and makes corrections we are beginning to see a reversal in our subscriber trends, as is evident by the net decrease in subscribers for the three months ended September 30, 2011 of 8,066 representing only 6.2% of the total net decrease over the last twelve months.

Churn. Churn for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 was 16.2% compared to 15.8% for the nine months ended September 30, 2010. The increase in Churn was primarily driven by a decrease in our adult subscription renewal rates in Europe, particularly in the second quarter of 2011.

Average Revenue per Subscriber. ARPU for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 was $20.24 as compared to $20.20 for the nine months ended September 30, 2010, representing a slight increase of $0.04, or 0.2%.

Cost Per Gross Addition. CPGA for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 was $43.55 as compared to $49.11 for the nine months ended September 30, 2010, representing a decrease of $5.56 or 11.3%. The decrease was primarily driven by a decrease in our ad buy expense on our adult websites from $22.4 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2010 to $12.3 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2011.

Average Lifetime Net Revenue Per Subscriber. Average Lifetime Net Revenue Per Subscriber for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 was $81.51 as compared to $78.99 for the nine months ended September 30, 2010, representing an increase of $2.52 or 3.2%. The increase was primarily driven by the decrease in the CPGA discussed above.

General Audience Social Networking Websites

Subscribers. There were 41,475 total ending subscribers on September 30, 2011 as compared to 57,613 total ending subscribers on September 30, 2010, representing a net decrease of 16,138 or 28.0% over the last twelve months. The decrease was primarily driven by higher churn in the twelve months ended September 30, 2011 as compared to the twelve months ended September 30, 2010.

Churn. Churn for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 was 19.2% as compared 17.2% for the nine months ended September 30, 2010. The increase in Churn was primarily driven by the acquisition of PerfectMatch.com in the third quarter of 2011 which has historically operated at slightly higher Churn rates than our legacy general audience websites.

Average Revenue per Subscriber. ARPU for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 was $19.90 as compared to $20.33 for the nine months ended September 30, 2010, representing a decrease of $0.43 or 2.1%. The decrease in ARPU was primarily driven by a decrease in the proportion of subscribers purchasing subscriptions on our higher priced general audience websites.

Cost Per Gross Addition. CPGA for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 was $29.03 as compared to $29.80 for the nine months ended September 30, 2010, representing a decrease of $0.77 or 2.6%. The decrease in CPGA was primarily driven by a decrease in our affiliate expense from $2.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 to $1.4 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2011.

Average Lifetime Net Revenue Per Subscriber. Average Lifetime Net Revenue Per Subscriber for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 was $74.71 as compared to $88.20 for the nine months ended September 30, 2010, representing a decrease of $13.49 or 15.3%. The decrease was primarily driven by the increase in Churn discussed above.

Live Interactive Video Websites

Average Revenue Per Minute. Average Revenue Per Minute for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 was $2.33 as compared to $2.13 for the nine months ended September 30, 2010, representing an increase of $0.20, or 9.3%. The primary reason for the increase is that the higher value paid users continued to buy our products and services while lower value paid users curtailed spending on the site as a result of the general economic slowdown.

Total Purchased Minutes. Total purchased minutes for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 were 26.0 million as compared to 26.4 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010, representing an increase of 0.4 million or 1.4%. The primary reason for the increase in purchased minutes was an increase in minutes purchased through upselling to existing subscribers on our subscription sites.

Internet Segment Historical Operating Data for the Year Ended December 31, 2010 as Compared to the Year Ended December 31, 2009

Adult Social Networking Websites

Subscribers. Subscribers for the year ended December 31, 2010 were 928,314 as compared to 916,005 for the year ended December 31, 2009, representing an increase of 12,309 or 1.3%. The increase was driven by the decrease in subscriber churn for our adult social networking websites from 16.3% for the year ended December 31, 2009 to 16.0% for the year ended December 31, 2010. Churn is influenced by a combination of factors including the perceived value of the content and quality of the user experience.

Churn. Churn for the year ended December 31, 2010 was 16.0% as compared to 16.3% for the year ended December 31, 2009, representing a decrease of 30 basis points, or a 2.0% decrease. Churn is the most direct measurement of the value our subscribers get for the price we charge. We strive to provide our subscribers with a positive user experience, minimize technical difficulties and provide a competitively priced service. Our activities and efforts seek to lower churn rates as much as possible.

Average Revenue per Subscriber. ARPU for the year ended December 31, 2010 was $20.47 as compared to $20.73 for the year ended December 31, 2009, representing a decrease of $0.26. The numbers declined due to a proportionally larger increase in the average number of subscribers compared to revenue.

Cost Per Gross Addition. CPGA for the year ended December 31, 2010 was $48.43 as compared to $47.24 for the year ended December 31, 2009, representing an increase of $1.19 or 2.5%. The increase was primarily driven by an increase in our affiliate expense on our adult social networking websites from $51.8 million in the year ended December 31, 2009 to $59.3 million in the year ended December 31, 2010 driven by affiliates switching to upfront payment plans.

Average Lifetime Net Revenue Per Subscriber. Average Lifetime Net Revenue Per Subscriber for the year ended December 31, 2010 was $79.45 as compared to $79.64 for the year ended December 31, 2009, representing a decrease of $0.19 or 0.2%. The decrease was driven by an increase in the CPGA from $47.24 for the year ended December 31, 2009 to $48.43 for the year ended December 31, 2010.

General Audience Social Networking Websites

Subscribers. Subscribers for the year ended December 31, 2010 were 53,198 as compared to 57,431 for the year ended December 31, 2009, representing a decrease of 4,233 or 7.4%. The decrease was driven by the increase in new subscribers churn for our general audience social networking websites from 15.5% for the year ended December 31, 2009 to 17.3% for the year ended December 31, 2010.

Churn. Churn for the year ended December 31, 2010 was 17.3% as compared to 15.5% for the year ended December 31, 2009, representing an increase of 170 basis points, or 11.2%. Churn is the most direct measurement of the value our subscribers get for the price we charge. We strive to provide our subscribers with a positive user experience, minimize technical difficulties and provide a competitively priced service. Our activities and efforts seek to lower churn rates as much as possible.

Average Revenue per Subscriber. ARPU for the year ended December 31, 2010 was $20.72 as compared to $18.05 for the year ended December 31, 2009, representing an increase of $2.67 or 14.8%. The primary reason for the increase is the decrease in general audience subscribers coupled with an increase in general audience revenue from $13.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2009 to $13.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2010.

Cost Per Gross Addition. CPGA for the year ended December 31, 2010 was $29.04 as compared to $41.61 for the year ended December 31, 2009, representing a decrease of $12.57 or 30.2%. The decrease was primarily driven by significant reduction in our ad buy expense from $1.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2009 to $0.6 million and for the year ended December 31, 2010.

Average Lifetime Net Revenue Per Subscriber. Average Lifetime Net Revenue Per Subscriber for the year ended December 31, 2010 was $91.02 as compared to $74.71 for the year ended December 31, 2009, representing an increase of $16.31 or 21.8%. The increase was driven by the increase in ARPU and the significant decrease in CPGA described above.

Live Interactive Video Websites

Average Revenue Per Minute. Average Revenue Per Minute for the year ended December 31, 2010 was $3.90 as compared to $3.49 for the year ended December 31, 2009, representing an increase of $0.41, or 11.7%. The primary reason for the increase is that the higher value paid users continued to buy our products and services while lower value paid users curtailed spending on the site as a result of the general economic slowdown.

Total Purchased Minutes. Total purchased minutes for the year ended December 31, 2010 were 19.6 million as compared to 17.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2009, representing an increase of $2.3 million or 13.3%. The primary reason for the increase in purchased minutes was the improvement in our technology and product offering with the expansion of high definition video and improvement in lag times.

Internet Segment Historical Operating Data for the Year Ended December 31, 2009 as Compared to the Year Ended December 31, 2008

Adult Social Networking Websites

Subscribers. Subscribers for the year ended December 31, 2009 were 916,005 as compared to 896,211 for the year ended December 31, 2008, representing an increase of 19,794 or 2.2%. The increase was driven by the decrease in subscriber churn for our adult social networking websites from 2.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2008 to 1.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2009, which was partially offset by a decrease in new subscribers from 1.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2008 to 1.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2009. New subscribers result from marketing activities that drive visitors to our websites, encouraging visitors to become registrants, providing limited services to members and the up-selling of special features including premium content. Churn is influenced by a combination of factors including the perceived value of the content and quality of the user experience.

Churn. Churn for the year ended December 31, 2009 was 16.3% as compared to 17.8% for the year ended December 31, 2008, representing a decrease of 150 basis points, or a 8.0% decrease. Churn is the most direct measurement of the value our subscribers get for the price we charge. We strive to provide our subscribers with a positive user experience, minimize technical difficulties and provide a competitively priced service. Our activities and efforts seek to lower churn rates as much as possible.

Average Revenue per Subscriber. ARPU for the year ended December 31, 2009 was $20.73 as compared to $22.28 for the year ended December 31, 2008, representing a decrease of $1.55, or 7.0%. The primary reason for the decrease was the reduction in net revenue during this period as compared to a increase in the number of subscribers over the same period. For more information regarding our 2008 revenue, adjusted for purchase accounting, see the sections entitled “Prospectus Summary — Certain Non-Financial Operating Data” and “ — Year Ended December 31, 2009 as Compared to the Year Ended December 31, 2008.”

Cost Per Gross Addition. CPGA for the year ended December 31, 2009 was $47.24 as compared to $51.26 for the year ended December 31, 2008, representing a decrease of $4.02 or 7.8%. The decrease was driven by a decrease in our affiliate commission expense from $53.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2008 to $51.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2009 and a decrease in our ad buy expense from $45.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2008 to $32.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2009.

Average Lifetime Net Revenue Per Subscriber. Average Lifetime Net Revenue Per Subscriber for the year ended December 31, 2009 was $79.64 as compared to $74.22 for the year ended December 31, 2008, representing an increase of $5.42 or 7.3%. The increase was driven by a decrease in churn from 17.8% for the year ended December 31, 2008 to 16.3% for the year ended December 31, 2009.

General Audience Social Networking Websites

Subscribers. Subscribers for the year ended December 31, 2009 were 57,431 as compared to 68,647 for the year ended December 31, 2008, representing a decrease of 11,216 or 16.3%. The decline was driven by the decrease in new subscribers to our general audience social networking websites from 174,290 for the year ended December 31, 2008 to 116,608 for the year ended December 31, 2009, which was partially offset by a decrease in terminations of existing subscribers from 191,536 for the year ended December 31, 2008 to 127,824 for the year ended December 31, 2009.

Churn. Churn for the year ended December 31, 2009 is 15.5% as compared to 18.6% for the year ended December 31, 2008, representing a decrease of 310 basis points, or a 16.5% decrease. Churn is the most direct measurement of the value our subscribers get for the price we charge. We strive to provide our subscribers with a positive user experience, minimize technical difficulties and provide a competitively priced service. Our activities and efforts seek to lower churn rates as much as possible.

Average Revenue per Subscriber. ARPU for the year ended December 31, 2009 was $18.05 as compared to $19.21 for the year ended December 31, 2008, representing a decrease of $1.16 or 6.0%. The primary reason for the decrease is the decrease in general audience social networking subscribers from 174,290 for the year ended December 31, 2008 to 116,608 for the year ended December 31, 2009, which was partially offset by a decrease in terminations of existing subscribers from 191,536 for the year ended December 31, 2008 to 127,824 for the year ended December 31, 2009. For more information regarding our 2008 revenue adjusted for purchase accounting, see the sections entitled “Prospectus Summary — Certain Non-Financial Operating Data” and “— Year Ended December 31, 2009 as Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2008.”

Cost Per Gross Addition. CPGA for the year ended December 31, 2009 was $41.61 as compared to $36.68 for the year ended December 31, 2008, representing an increase of $4.93 or 13.4%. The increase was primarily driven by a decrease in new subscribers on our general audience social networking websites from 174,290 for the year ended December 31, 2008 to 116,608 for the year ended December 31, 2009, which was partially offset by a decrease in ad buy expense from $2.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2008 to $1.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2009.

Average Lifetime Net Revenue Per Subscriber. Average Lifetime Net Revenue Per Subscriber for the year ended December 31, 2009 was $74.71 as compared to $66.70 for the year ended December 31, 2008, representing an increase of $8.01 or 12.0%. The increase was caused by a decrease in churn from 18.6% for the year ended December 31, 2008 to 15.5% for the year ended December 31, 2009.

Live Interactive Video Websites

Average Revenue Per Minute. Average Revenue Per Minute for the year ended December 31, 2009 was $3.49 as compared to $2.87 for the year ended December 31, 2008, representing an increase of $0.62 or 21.6%. The primary reason for the increase was the increase in live interactive video websites revenue adjusted for purchase accounting from $54.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2008 to $60.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2009. For more information regarding our 2008 revenue adjusted for purchase accounting, see the sections entitled “Prospectus Summary — Certain Non-Financial Operating Data” and “— Year Ended December 31, 2009 as Compared to the Year Ended December 31, 2008.” The live interactive video websites are in large part a pay-by-usage service subject to the highly discretionary decisions of our users. As such, the decline in both revenues and number of minutes is in large part a result of the general economic slowdown.

Total Purchased Minutes. Total purchased minutes for the year ended December 31, 2009 were 17.3 million as compared to 19.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2008, representing a decrease of $1.8 million or 9.5%. The primary reason for the decrease was the condition of the overall economy.

Non-GAAP Financial Measures

We believe that certain non-GAAP financial measures of earnings before deducting net interest expense, income taxes, depreciation and amortization, or EBITDA, and adjusted EBITDA are helpful financial measures to be utilized by an investor determining whether to invest in us. First, they eliminate one-time adjustments made for accounting purposes in connection with our Various acquisition in order to provide information that is directly comparable to our historical and current financial statements. For more information regarding our acquisition of Various, please refer to the section entitled “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations — Our History.” For example, our depreciation and amortization expense has changed significantly due to the Various acquisition and purchase accounting impact on depreciation and amortization expense, as discussed below. Second, they eliminate adjustments for non-cash impairment charges for goodwill and intangible assets, which we believe will help an investor evaluate our future prospects, without taking into account historical non-cash charges that we believe are not recurring. Finally, they allow the investor to measure

our operating performance year over year without taking into account non-recurring items and the wide disparity in the amounts of the interest, depreciation and amortization and tax expense items set forth in the financial statements.

For instance, we are highly leveraged and we have had a large varying amount of interest expense. We used the proceeds from our recent IPO to repay a portion of our New First Lien Notes and Cash Pay Second Lien Notes, thereby reducing our interest expense (see “Note 9-Long Term Debt”), as well as incurring a loss on extinguishment of debt. Also in conjunction with our IPO, we were required to begin recording compensation expense related to our stock options. In addition, we have the benefit of interest deductions and tax loss carryforwards which distorts comparisons of income tax benefit from year to year as interest expense is reduced and tax carryforwards are depleted and we book an income tax expense as opposed to a benefit. We believe analysts, investors and others frequently use EBITDA and adjusted EBITDA in the evaluation of companies in our industry.

These non-GAAP financial measures may not provide information that is directly comparable to that provided by other companies in our industry, as other companies in our industry may calculate such financial measures differently, particularly as it relates to nonrecurring, unusual items. Our non-GAAP financial measures of EBITDA and adjusted EBITDA are not measurements of financial performance under GAAP and should not be considered as alternatives to cash flow from operating activities or as measures of liquidity or as alternatives to net income or as indications of operating performance or any other measure of performance derived in accordance with GAAP.

The following table reflects the reconciliation of GAAP net loss to the non-GAAP financial measures of EBITDA and adjusted EBITDA.

Reconciliation of GAAP Net Loss to EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA

	Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2011			2010
	(in thousands) (unaudited)
GAAP net loss	$	(20,938	)	$	(19,480	)
Add: Interest expense, net		65,097			69,128
(Subtract): Income tax benefit		(5,542	)		(219	)
Add: Amortization of acquired intangible assets and software		11,906			18,793
Add: Depreciation and other amortization		3,268			3,556
EBITDA	$	53,791		$	71,778
Add: Broadstream arbitration provision, including related legal fees		7,394			—
Add (subtract): (gain) loss related to VAT liability not charged to customers		2,931			1,306
Add: Loss of extinguishment of debt		7,312			—
Add: Stock Compensation Expense		2,554			—
Add: Severance Costs		388			—
Adjusted EBITDA	$	74,370		$	73,084

Reconciliation of GAAP Net Loss to EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA

	Consolidated Data
	Year Ended December 31,
	2010			2009			2008
	(in thousands)
GAAP net loss	$	(43,153	)	$	(41,216	)	$	(45,966	)
Add: Interest expense, net		88,508			92,139			80,510
Subtract: Income tax benefit		(486	)		(5,332	)		(18,176	)
Add: Amortization of acquired intangible assets and software		24,461			35,454			36,347
Add: Depreciation and other amortization		4,704			4,881			4,502
EBITDA	$	74,034		$	85,926		$	57,217
Add: Deferred revenue purchase accounting adjustment⁽¹⁾		—			—			19,200
Add: Impairment of goodwill		—			—			9,571

100

	Consolidated Data
	Year Ended December 31,
	2010		2009			2008
	(in thousands)
Add: Impairment of other intangible assets	$	4,660	$	4,000		$	14,860
Add: Broadstream arbitration provision		13,000		—			—
Add (subtract): Loss (gain) related to VAT liability not charged to customers		1,683		7,942			(9,456	)
Add: Net Loss on extinguishment and modification of debt		7,457		7,240			—
Add: Other finance expenses		4,562		—			—
Subtract: Non-recurring refund by former owner of litigation costs for legacy patent case		—		(2,685	)		—
Adjusted EBITDA⁽²⁾	$	105,396	$	102,423		$	91,392

(1)

Net revenue for the year ended December 31, 2008 does not reflect $19.2 million due to a non-recurring purchase accounting adjustment that required the deferred revenue at the date of the acquisition of Various to be recorded at fair value. Management believes that it is appropriate to add back the deferred revenue adjustment because the average renewal rate of the subscriptions that were the basis for the deferred revenue was approximately 63%. The renewal rate on subscriptions that had already been renewed at least one time since the acquisition was 78%. Therefore, management believes that historical results of Various are reflective of our future results, including those revenues that were added back to adjusted EBITDA.

(2)

For the year ended December 31, 2008 and for the quarters ended March 31, 2008, June 30, 2008, September 30, 2008, March 31, 2009 and June 30, 2009, we failed to satisfy our EBITDA covenants with respect to our 2006 Notes and 2005 Notes because of operating performance. For the quarters ended March 31, 2008, June 30, 2008 and September 30, 2008 we failed to satisfy our EBITDA covenants with respect to the New First Lien Notes and the Second Lien Subordinated Secured Notes due to the liability related to VAT not charged to customers and the purchase accounting adjustment due to the required reduction of the deferred revenue liability to fair value. On October 8, 2009, these events of default were cured. For the quarter ended September 30, 2009, we met our EBITDA covenants with respect to our 2006 Notes and 2005 Notes, each as amended. For the year ended December 31, 2009 and the quarters ended March 31, 2010, June 30, 2010 and September 30, 2010, we met our EBITDA covenants with respect to the New First Lien Notes and the Second Lien Subordinated Secured Notes. For more information regarding this and other events of default under our note agreements, see the section entitled “Description of Indebtedness.” The above mentioned debt was paid off with the proceeds of the New Financing. Our new note agreements contain material debt covenants based on our maintaining specified levels of EBITDA (as it is defined in the particular agreement as noted below). Specifically, we are required to maintain the following EBITDA levels for our outstanding debt:

•

For each of the fiscal quarters ending through September 30, 2011, September 30, 2012 and September 30, 2013, our EBITDA (as defined) on a consolidated basis for the four consecutive fiscal quarters ending on such date needs to be greater than $85 million, $90 million and $95 million, respectively. Our EBITDA for the four quarters ended December 31, 2010, as defined in the relevant documents, was $105.4 million.

We met our EBITDA covenant requirements for the quarter and year ended December 31, 2010.

For the year ended December 31, 2010, our EBITDA and adjusted EBITDA were $74.0 million and $105.4 million, respectively. For the nine months ended September 30, 2011, our EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA were $53.8 million and $74.4 million, respectively. Management derived adjusted EBITDA for the year ended December 31, 2010 and the nine months ended September 30, 2011 using the following adjustments.

There were non-cash impairment charges to intangible assets of $4.7 million related to our entertainment segment in 2010. For the following reasons, management believes it is appropriate to add back a $4.7 million impairment charge to other intangible assets to derive a more meaningful measure of EBITDA for 2010. While we have had impairment charges for previous years relating to the businesses in operation prior to the Various acquisition, with the impairment charges taken in 2008, the goodwill relating to our non-internet business units of the company has been reduced to zero. The non-internet intangible assets have also been written down to reflect the fair value of these assets. Further, management believes that with the acquisition and integration of the Various business, the online business unit that is now operated in conjunction with the internet businesses of Various should not be expected to have further impairment going forward. Management gauges its operating performance without giving effect to the impairment charges taken historically due to its belief that it is unlikely that further impairment charges will be incurred. However, there can be no assurance that there will be no further impairment to the Company’s goodwill or intangible assets.

Management believes that the VAT activity that relates to periods prior to notification from the European Union tax authorities, which we refer to as VAT not charged to customers, should be excluded from adjusted non-GAAP net income (loss) and adjusted EBITDA. After our acquisition of Various, we became aware that Various and its subsidiaries had not collected VAT from subscribers in the European Union nor had Various remitted VAT to the

101

tax jurisdictions requiring it. We have since registered with the tax authorities of the applicable European Union jurisdictions. We began collecting VAT from subscribers in July 2008, and all amounts from July 2008 and beyond are considered current VAT and such costs are presented on a net basis and excluded from revenue in the statement of operations. Since the VAT liabilities not charged to customers, including penalties, interest expense, gains and losses on settlements and foreign exchange gains and losses, is unusual and not representative of our current operations, we have excluded it from adjusted EBITDA.

The Broadstream arbitration costs including settlement and related legal fees which the Company originally expensed in 2010 is added back as it is a non-recurring event regarding the Broadstream litigation. The litigation resulted from certain activities occurring during the Various acquisition. For further information regarding this litigation and the expense, see “Note 16—Contingencies” in our consolidated financial statements located elsewhere in this prospectus.

The loss on extinguishment of debt related to the redemption of approximately $39.5 million of debt in conjunction with proceeds received from our IPO in May 2011. This charge was added back as it was related to our IPO and did not relate to the operating performance of the Company.

Stock Compensation Expense was added back as it a non-cash item that does not relate to the operating performance of the Company.

Lastly, severance costs were added back as those do not relate to the operating performance of the Company.

Selected Quarterly Financial Data (unaudited)

The following tables set forth our unaudited consolidated quarterly operating results for each of the eight quarters in the two-year period ended December 31, 2010 and the quarters ended March 31, June 30, and September 30, 2011. This information is derived from our unaudited financial statements, which in the opinion of management contain all adjustments consisting of only normal recurring adjustments that we consider necessary for a fair statement of such financial data. Operating results for the periods ended March 31, June 30, and September 30, 2011 are not necessarily indicative of the operating results for a full year. Historical results are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected in future periods. You should read this data together with our consolidated financial statements and the related notes included elsewhere in this prospectus.

	Quarter Ended
	March 31,			June 30,			September 30,			December 31,
	(in thousands, except per share data)
2011
Net revenue	$	83,520		$	83,371		$	82,736			—
Gross profit		56,759			58,324			54,823			—
Income from operations		19,675			17,996			14,711			—
Net loss		(3,681	)		(11,861	)		(5,396	)		—
Net loss per common share — basic and diluted		(0.27	)		(0.55	)		(0.18	)		—

2010
Net revenue	$	86,205		$	84,623		$	86,663		$	88,506
Gross profit		56,563			56,407			59,732			62,806
Income from operations		12,974			15,615			21,716			21,432
Net loss		(8,269	)		(4,931	)		(6,281	)		(23,672	)
Net loss per common share — basic and diluted		(0.60	)		(0.36	)		(0.46	)		(1.71	)

2009
Net revenue	$	84,125		$	80,800		$	79,514		$	83,253
Gross profit		59,146			58,300			58,260			60,289
Income from operations		15,017			14,545			15,839			12,994
Net loss		(3,140	)		(17,651	)		(6,623	)		(13,802	)
Net loss per common share — basic and diluted		(0.23	)		(1.29	)		(0.48	)		(1.00	)

102

Liquidity and Capital Resources

On May 16, 2011, we completed our initial public offering and issued 5,000,000 shares of common stock at a price of $10.00 per share, raising proceeds of approximately $43.5 million, net of underwriting discounts and commissions and estimated offering costs. Such net proceeds were used to redeem approximately $39.5 million in principal amount of long term debt.

As of September 30, 2011, we had cash of $16.4 million, plus restricted cash of $11.7 million compared to $28.8 million and 7.2 million for the same period in 2010. We generate our cash flows from operations. For the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, cash flows generated from operations were $21.7 million and $28.7 million, respectively. We have no working capital line of credit. Our current New First Lien Notes and Cash Pay Second Lien Notes require us to make principal payments equivalent to 75% of Excess Cash Flow, as defined at 102% of principal 35 calendar days after each quarter end. During the nine months ended September 30, 2011, principal of such notes was reduced by $33.3 million from excess cash flow. On November 5, 2011 we made an Excess Cash Flow payment which resulted in a principal reduction of $7.0 million and $0.3 million of the New First Lien Notes and Cash Pay Second Lien Notes respectively. Our next Excess Cash Flow payment is scheduled for February 5, 2012.

We also recently made the second payment due to the Broadstream settlement of $5.0 million on September 29, 2011, and the final payment of $2.0 million will be payable no later than January 2, 2012.

On October 27, 2010, the Company completed the New Financing. The former Senior Secured Notes, with an outstanding principal amount of $167.1 million, the Second Lien Subordinated Secured Notes, with an outstanding principal amount of $80.0 million and $32.8 principal amount of former Senior Secured Notes were exchanged for, or redeemed with proceeds of, $305.0 million principal amount of the Senior Secured Notes. Accrued interest on the New First Lien Notes, Second Lien Subordinated Secured Notes and former Senior Secured Notes was paid in cash at closing. The remaining $13,502,000 principal amount of former Senior Secured Notes were exchanged for $13.8 million of the Non-Cash Pay Notes. The Subordinated Convertible Notes and Subordinated Term Notes, with outstanding principal amounts of $180.2 million and $42.8 million respectively, together with accrued interest of $9.5 million were exchanged for $232.5 million principal amount of the Non-Cash Pay Notes. The principal amount of the Non-Cash Pay Notes at December 31, 2010 included $4.8 million of interest which was paid with the issuance of additional Non-Cash Pay Notes.

In December 2007, we acquired Various for approximately $401.0 million. The purchase price of approximately $401.0 million paid to the sellers consisted of approximately (i) $137.0 million in cash, (ii) notes valued at approximately $248.0 million, and (iii) warrants to acquire approximately 2.9 million shares of common stock, subject to adjustment for certain anti-dilution provisions, valued at approximately $16.0 million. The purchase price gives effect to a $61.0 million reduction attributable to a post-closing working capital adjustment which resulted in a $51.0 million reduction in the value of notes issued and a $10.0 million reduction in cash paid which is being held in escrow. This adjustment is the result of our indemnity claim against the sellers relating to the VAT liability. In addition, legal and other acquisition costs totaling approximately $4.0 million were incurred. The cash portion of the purchase price was obtained through the issuance of notes and warrants, including approximately $110.0 million from certain of our stockholders. On October 8, 2009, we settled all indemnity claims against the sellers (whether claims are VAT related or not) by adjusting the original principal amount of the Subordinated Convertible Notes to $156.0 million. In addition, the sellers agreed to make available to us, to pay VAT and certain VAT-related expenses, $10.0 million held in a working capital escrow established at the closing of the Various transaction. As of December 31, 2010, the total of $10.0 million had been released from the escrow to reimburse us for VAT-related expenses already incurred. If the actual costs to us of eliminating the VAT liability are less than $29.0 million, after applying amounts from the working capital escrow, then the principal amount of the Old Non-Cash Pay Notes (which were issued in exchange for the Subordinated Convertible Notes in the New Financing) will be increased by the issuance of additional Non-Cash Pay Notes to reflect the difference between $29.0 million and the actual VAT liability, plus interest on such difference.

The total amount of uncollected payments related to VAT not charged to customers as of December 31, 2010 was $39.4 million, including $19.5 million in potential penalties and interest. We are currently negotiating with tax authorities in the applicable European Union jurisdictions to extend the maturity of the payments. We have

103

settled with tax authorities or paid our tax liabilities in full in certain countries. We are in different stages of negotiations with many other jurisdictions, and we are not able to estimate when the rest of the jurisdictions will be settled or paid in full. However, if we were forced to pay the total amount in the next year, it would have a material adverse effect on our liquidity and capital resources since we will not have sufficient cash flow over the next year to pay these obligations and we expect that our ability to borrow funds to pay these obligations would be limited.

Cash Flow

Net cash provided by operations was $42.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2010 compared to $39.7 million for the same period in 2009. The increase was primarily attributable to reduced levels of accounts receivable and prepaid expenses together with reduced amounts of deferred debt and offering costs paid in 2010 as compared with 2009 offset by reductions in accounts payable and lower interest payments and increases in restricted cash for processing reserve requirements. The reduced level of accounts receivable is primarily attributable to a repayment for certain VAT taxes from the United Kingdom in 2010. The reduced level of prepaid expenses is attributable to prepaid commissions and state taxes paid in 2009. Reduced interest payments are attributable to reduction on principal amounts of long-term debt due to prepayments from excess cash flow.

Net cash used in investing activities for the year ended December 31, 2010 was $1.3 million compared to $4.2 million provided by for the same period in 2009. This decrease resulted from cash received from escrow in connection with the Various acquisition.

Net cash used in financing activities for the year ended December 31, 2010 was $29.4 million, compared to $45.0 million for the same period in 2009. The decrease is primarily due to reductions in repayment on our former Senior Secured Notes.

Net cash provided by operations was $39.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2009 compared to $50.9 million for the same period in 2008. The decrease is primarily due to the cash flows generated from our internet segment as a result of the acquisition of Various in December 2007.

Net cash provided by investing activities for the year ended December 31, 2009 was $4.2 million compared to net cash used in investing activities of $9.3 million for the same period in 2008. This increase resulted from cash received from the acquisition escrow and decreased purchases of property and equipment.

Net cash used in financing activities for the year ended December 31, 2009 was $45.0 million compared to $25.3 million for the same period in 2008. The increase is primarily due to required repayments on our former Senior Secured Notes issued in connection with the acquisition of Various. In addition to the required annual amortization, we were required to make quarterly principal payments on the former Senior Secured Notes, in an aggregate amount equal to 90% of the Excess Cash Flow (as defined in the securities purchase agreement governing the former Senior Secured Notes, or the 2007 Securities Purchase Agreement).

Information Regarding EBITDA Covenants

Our prior note agreements contained certain financial covenants regarding EBITDA. For the year ended December 31, 2008 and for the quarters ended March 31, 2008, June 30, 2008, September 30, 2008, March 31, 2009 and June 30, 2009, we failed to satisfy our EBITDA covenants with respect to our 2006 Notes and 2005 Notes because of operating performance. For the quarters ended March 31, 2008, June 30, 2008 and September 30, 2008 we failed to satisfy our EBITDA covenants with respect to the former Senior Secured Notes and the Second Lien Subordinated Secured Notes due to the liability related to VAT not charged to customers and the purchase accounting adjustment due to the required reduction of the deferred revenue liability to fair value. On October 8, 2009, these events of default were cured. For the quarter ended September 30, 2009, we met our EBITDA covenants with respect to our 2006 Notes and 2005 Notes, each as amended. For the year ended December 31, 2009 and the quarters ended March 31, 2010, June 30, 2010 and September 30, 2010, we met our EBITDA covenants with respect to the former Senior Secured Notes and the Second Lien Subordinated Secured Notes. The above mentioned debt was paid off with the proceeds of the New Financing.

104

Giving effect to the New Financing, we are required to maintain the following levels of EBITDA (as it is defined in the particular agreement as noted below):

•

For the last four quarters for any period ended through September 30, 2011, September 30, 2012 and September 30, 2013, our EBITDA on a consolidated basis for the year ended on such date needs to be greater than $85.0 million, $90.0 million and $95.0 million, respectively. Our EBITDA for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and the four quarters ended December 31, 2010 was $53.8 million and $74.0 million, respectively.

We met our EBITDA covenant requirements for the quarter ended September 30, 2011 and year ended December 31, 2010.

Financing Activities

We are currently highly leveraged and our outstanding notes are secured by substantially all of our assets. Our note agreements and Indentures contain many restrictions and covenants, including financial covenants regarding EBITDA. As disclosed in the risk factor entitled “We breached certain covenants contained in our previously existing note agreements and our Indentures....” above, we breached and subsequently cured a covenant in our Indentures. We are currently in compliance with the covenants under our outstanding notes, including all financial covenants. See the section entitled “ — Information Regarding EBITDA Covenants” above. To the extent that our notes are not fully repaid, we will remain subject to such restrictions and covenants. Interest expense for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and the year ended December 31, 2010 totaled $65.1 million and $88.5 million, respectively.

On October 27, 2010, we completed the New Financing. $305.0 million principal amount of Senior Secured Notes due 2013 were co-issued by us and INI of which (a) $200.2 million was exchanged for $130.5 million outstanding principal amount of First Lien Notes, $49.4 million outstanding principal amount of Second Lien Notes and $14.5 million outstanding principal amount of former Senior Secured Notes, (b) $91.4 million was issued for cash proceeds of $89.6 million before payment of related fees and expenses of $5.8 million and (c) $13.4 million was used to pay commitment fees to the holders of First Lien Notes and Second Lien Notes. Cash of $86.2 million was used to redeem $36.6 million of First Lien Notes at 102% of principal, $30.6 million of Second Lien Notes (representing the remaining outstanding principal amounts of First and Second Lien Notes) and $18.3 million outstanding principal amount of former Senior Secured Notes. Cash was also used to pay $4.1 million of accrued interest on the exchanged and redeemed notes, a $825,000 redemption premium on certain exchanged First Lien Notes and $435,000 in commitment fees to certain noteholders.

The remaining $13.5 million outstanding principal amount of former Senior Secured Notes were exchanged for $13.8 million principal amount of Cash Pay Notes. Subordinated Convertible Notes and Subordinated Term Notes, with outstanding principal amounts of $180.2 million and $42.8 million, respectively, together with accrued interest of $9.5 million, were exchanged for $232.5 million of Non-Cash Pay Notes co-issued by us and INI.

Senior Secured Notes

The Senior Secured Notes, in the principal amount of $305.0 million, of which approximately $112.0 million principal amount were issued to our stockholders including $7.5 million to entities controlled by certain officers and directors, were issued with an original issue discount of $6.1 million or 2.0%. The Senior Secured Notes mature on September 30, 2013 and accrue interest at a rate per annum equal to 14.0%. Interest on the Senior Secured Notes is payable quarterly on March 31, June 30, September 30 and December 31 of each year. Principal on the Senior Secured Notes is payable quarterly to the extent of 75% of Excess Cash Flow as defined at 102% of principal, subject to pro-rata sharing with the Cash Pay Notes. The Senior Secured Notes are guaranteed by our domestic subsidiaries and are collateralized by a first-priority lien on all their assets as well as a pledge of our subsidiaries stock. The guarantees are the senior secured obligations of each such subsidiary guarantor. The Senior Secured Notes are redeemable prior to maturity at our option in whole but not in part, at 110% of principal, and at principal at maturity on September 30, 2013, plus accrued and unpaid interest. Pursuant to the terms of the Indentures, the net proceeds of the IPO must be used to redeem the Senior Secured Notes and Cash Pay Notes pro-rata at 110% of principal, plus accrued and unpaid interest. In addition, noteholders have the option of requiring us to repay the Senior Secured

105

Notes in full upon a Change of Control, as defined in the Senior Secured Notes Indenture, at 110% of principal, plus accrued and unpaid interest. We shall also repay or offer to pay the Senior Secured Notes and, in certain circumstances, the Cash Pay Notes, with proceeds received from any debt or equity financing (including a secondary offering) and asset sales of $25 million or more at 110% of principal, plus accrued and unpaid interest, other asset sales, insurance claims, condemnation and other extraordinary cash receipts at principal, plus accrued and unpaid interest, subject to certain exceptions.

The Senior Secured Notes Indenture contains covenants applicable to us and our subsidiaries, including covenants relating to limitations and requirements with respect to indebtedness, restricted payments, dividends and other payments affecting our subsidiaries, sale-leaseback transactions, consolidations and mergers, asset sales, acquisitions and provision of financial statements and reports.

Cash Pay Notes

The Cash Pay Notes, in the principal amount of $13.8 million, all of which were issued to entities controlled by stockholders who are also officers and directors, were issued with an original issue discount of $276,000 or 2%, are identical to the terms of the Senior Secured Notes except as to matters regarding collateral, subordination, enforcement and voting. Cash Pay Notes are secured by a fully subordinated second lien on substantially all of our assets, parri passu with the Non-Cash Pay Notes, and will be included with the Senior Secured Notes on a dollar for dollar basis for purposes of determining required consents or waivers on all matters except for matters relating to collateral, liens and enforcement of rights and remedies. As to such matters, the Cash Pay Notes will be included with the Non-Cash Pay Notes for purposes of determining required consents or waivers.

Non-Cash Pay Notes

The Non-Cash Pay Notes, in the principal amount of $232.5 million, of which approximately $228.5 million principal amount were issued to our stockholders including $44.4 million to entities controlled by certain officers and directors, mature on April 30, 2014 and bear interest at 11.5%, payable semi-annually on June 30 and December 31, which may be paid in additional Non-Cash Pay Notes at our option. While the Senior Secured Notes are in place, interest must be paid with additional Non-Cash Pay Notes. The Non-Cash Pay Notes are guaranteed by our domestic subsidiaries and collateralized by a second priority lien on all of their assets and a pledge of our subsidiaries stock; however, such security interest is subordinate to the prior payment of the Senior Secured Notes. The guarantees are the senior secured obligations of each such subsidiary guarantor subordinate only to the first-priority lien granted to the holders of the Senior Secured Notes. The Non-Cash Pay Notes are redeemable, at our option, in whole but not in part, at 100% of principal, plus accrued and unpaid interest, subject to the rights of the holders of the Senior Secured Notes under the intercreditor agreement between the holders of the Senior Secured Notes, the holders of the Cash Pay Notes and the holders of the Non-Cash Pay Notes. This agreement provides that no redemption of the Non-Cash Pay Notes may occur until the Senior Secured Notes are repaid in full.

Upon the payment in full of the Senior Secured Notes, principal on the Non-Cash Pay Notes is payable quarterly to the extent of 75% of Excess Cash Flow as defined at 102% of principal subject to pro-rata sharing with the Cash Pay Notes. Due to our IPO, if the Senior Secured Notes are paid in full, the remaining proceeds must be used to redeem the Non-Cash Pay Notes and the Cash Pay Notes on a pro-rata basis at 110% of principal, plus accrued and unpaid interest. In addition, noteholders have the option of requiring us to repay the Non-Cash Pay Notes in full upon a Change of Control, as defined in the Non-Cash Pay Notes Indenture, at 110% of principal, plus accrued and unpaid interest. If the Senior Secured Notes are paid in full, we shall repay the remaining Non-Cash Pay Notes and the Cash Pay Notes on a pro-rata basis with proceeds received from any debt or equity financing (including a secondary offering), and asset sales of over $25 million at 110% of principal, plus accrued and unpaid interest, and other asset sales, insurance claim, condemnation and other extraordinary cash receipts at principal, subject to certain exceptions.

Upon consummation of our IPO on May 16, 2011, the Non-Cash Pay Notes became convertible into shares of our common stock. The conversion price of the Non-Cash Pay Notes is the per share offering price for shares of our common stock upon consummation of our IPO, or $10.00 per share, provided that such conversion option shall be limited to approximately 21.1% of the fully diluted equity. The $183.7 million principal amount of Non-Cash Pay Notes exchanged for outstanding Subordinated Convertible Notes were recorded at the carrying amount

106

for such convertible notes as the exchange was accounted for as if the outstanding convertible notes were not extinguished. The $48.8 million principal amount of Non-Cash Pay Notes exchanged for non-convertible Subordinated Term Notes have been recorded at estimated fair value at the date of issuance as the exchange was accounted for as an extinguishment of the Subordinated Term Notes.

The Non-Cash Pay Notes Indenture contains covenants applicable to us and our subsidiaries, including covenants relating to limitations and requirements with respect to indebtedness, restricted payments, dividends and other payments affecting our subsidiaries, sale-leaseback transactions, consolidations and mergers, asset sales and acquisitions and provision of financial statements and reports. These covenants are substantially identical to those contained in the Senior Secured Notes.

We have determined that the Senior Secured Notes are not substantially different from the formerly outstanding former Senior Secured Notes and Second Lien Subordinated Secured Notes for which they were exchanged, nor are the Non-Cash Pay Notes substantially different from the formerly outstanding Subordinated Convertible Notes for which they were exchanged, based on the less than 10% differences in present values of cash flows of the respective debt instruments and, accordingly, such exchanges are accounted for as if the formerly outstanding notes were not extinguished. Accordingly, a new effective interest rate has been determined for the outstanding notes based on the carrying amount of such notes and the revised cash flows of the newly issued notes. In connection therewith, commitment fees paid to the note holders, together with an allocable portion of existing unamortized discount, and debt issuance and modification costs will be amortized as an adjustment of interest expense over the remaining term of the new notes using the effective interest method. Private placement fees related to the Senior Secured Notes together with legal and other fees aggregating approximately $4.6 million allocated to the exchanges was charged to other finance expense.

We have determined that the Senior Secured Notes and Cash Pay Notes are substantially different than the outstanding $28.1 million principal amount of 2005 Notes and 2006 Notes for which they were exchanged based on the more than 10% difference in present values of cash flows of the respective debt instruments and, accordingly, the exchanges are accounted for as an extinguishment of the 2005 Notes and 2006 Notes. We recorded a pre-tax loss on debt extinguishment in the quarter ended December 31, 2010 of $10.5 million related to such exchanged 2005 Notes and 2006 Notes and to the 2005 Notes and 2006 Notes, and INI First Lien Notes and Second Lien Subordinated Secured Notes redeemed for cash. The loss includes the writeoff of unamortized costs and fees aggregating $8.6 million related to the notes which were extinguished.

We also determined that the Non-Cash Pay Notes are substantially different than the non-convertible Subordinated Term Loan Notes for which they were exchanged based on the conversion feature in the new notes and, accordingly, the exchange was accounted for as an extinguishment of the Subordinated Term Loan Notes. We recorded a gain on extinguishment of $3.0 million.

On May 16, 2011, we completed our IPO and issued 5,000,000 shares of common stock at a price of $10.00 per share, raising proceeds of approximately $43.5 million, net of underwriting discounts and commissions and estimated offering costs. Such net proceeds were used to redeem approximately $39.5 million in principal amount of long term debt.

Registration Rights

We have agreed to consummate an exchange offer pursuant to an effective registration statement to be filed with the SEC to allow the holders of the Senior Secured Notes, Cash Pay Notes and Non-Cash Pay Notes to exchange their notes for a new issue of substantially identical notes. On August 1, 2011, we filed a registration statement with the SEC relating to the exchange offer. In addition, we have agreed to file under certain circumstances, a shelf registration statement to cover resales of the Senior Secured Notes, Cash Pay Notes and Non-Cash Pay Notes. In October 2011, due to an interpretation of the SEC which did not allow an exchange offer for the above referenced notes, we withdrew the exchange offer. On October 18, 2011, we filed a registration statement on Form S-1 to cover re-sales of the Senior Secured Notes, Cash Pay Notes and Non-Cash Pay Notes. In the event that we fail to satisfy the registration and/or exchange requirements within prescribed time periods, the interest rate on the Senior Secured Notes, Cash Pay Notes and Non-Cash Pay Notes will be increased by 3.5%. (See Note 9 (e) — “Long Term Debt”)

107

Contractual Obligations

The following table sets forth our contractual obligations as of September 30, 2011:

			Payments due by period
	Total		Less Than 1 Year		1-3 Years		3-5 Years		More Than 5 Years
	($ in thousands)
Long-term Notes Payable, including current portion:
Senior Secured Notes⁽¹⁾	$	235,332	$	6,957	$	228,375		—		—
Cash Pay Notes⁽¹⁾		10,631		314		10,317		—
Non-Cash Pay Notes⁽¹⁾		250,849		—		250,849		—		—
Sellers Agreements⁽²⁾		2,250		1,000		1,250		—		—
Operating Leases⁽³⁾		11,299		2,282		6,478		852		1,687
Other⁽⁴⁾		4,164		4,164		—		—		—
Total⁽⁵⁾	$	514,525	$	14,717	$	497,269	$	852	$	1,687

(1)

We used the net cash proceeds from our initial public offering of our common stock to repay a portion of the Senior Secured Notes and Cash Pay Notes pro rata at a redemption price of 110%, plus accrued and unpaid interest. The Senior Secured and Cash Pay Notes mature on September 30, 2013. The Non-Cash Pay Notes mature on April 30, 2014.

(2)

Agreements with the former owners of Various recorded at present value of $2.3 million using discount rate of 15%.

Represents our minimum rental commitments for non-cancellable operating leases of office space.

ii.

Other commitments and obligations are comprised of contracts with software licensing, communications, computer hosting, and marketing service providers. These amounts totaled $4.2 million for less than one year. Contracts with other service providers are for 30 day terms or less.

iii.

Interest expense has been excluded from the Contractual Obligations table above. As of September 30, 2011, the Company had $235.3 million and $10.6 million of Senior Secured Notes and Cash Pay Notes, respectively, which would result in an annual cash interest expense obligation of $34.4 million before giving effect to required principal reductions from excess cash flow. No cash interest payments are payable in respect of Non-Cash Pay Notes.

Off-Balance Sheet Transactions

As of September 30, 2011, we did not have any off-balance sheet arrangements.

Related Party Transactions

There were no material changes to the Company’s related party transactions as discussed in the section “Certain Relationships and Related Party Transactions” in the Company’s IPO Prospectus filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 11, 2011, for the year ended December 31, 2010.

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

We are exposed to market risk attributed to interest and foreign currency exchange rates.

Interest Rate Risk

We are not exposed to any interest rate fluctuations.

Foreign Currency Exchange Risk

Our exposure to foreign currency exchange risk is due to our international operations. As of September 30, 2011, we had a $42.8 million liability for VAT denominated in Euros and $2.1 million of restricted cash denominated in Euros and Pounds held by foreign credit card processors, which represent substantially all of our foreign currency exchange rate exposure. In addition, we have foreign currency exposure related to the net assets and operations of JigoCity which we acquired in September 2011. In addition, revenues derived from international websites are paid in advance primarily with credit cards and are denominated in local currencies. Substantially all such currencies are converted into U.S. dollars on the dates of the transactions at rates of exchange in effect on such dates and

108

remitted to us and accordingly, is recorded based on the U.S. dollars received by us. As a result, our foreign currency exchange risk exposure is not material and is limited to the amount of foreign exchange rate changes on any individual day on the portion of our net revenue received in other currencies. Restricted cash held by foreign credit card processors and VAT liabilities denominated in foreign currencies are converted into U.S. dollars using current exchange rates in effect as of the balance sheet date. Gains and losses resulting from transactions denominated in foreign currencies are recorded in the statement of operations. The potential loss resulting from a hypothetical 10.0% adverse change in quoted foreign currency exchange rates is approximately $4.5 million. We do not utilize any currency hedging strategies.

Operations of JigoCity’s foreign subsidiaries are conducted in local currencies which represents their functional currencies. Balance sheet accounts of such subsidiaries are translated from foreign currencies into U.S. dollars at the exchange rate in effect at each balance sheet date and income statement accounts are translated at the average rate of exchange prevailing during the period. Translation adjustments resulting from this process, which were not significant at September 30, 2011, are not included in the statement of operations, but will be included in accumulated other comprehensive income on the consolidated balance sheet.

Inflation Risk

We are subject to the effects of changing prices. We have, however, generally been able to pass along inflationary increases in our costs by increasing the prices of our products and subscriptions.

Sarbanes-Oxley Compliance and Corporate Governance

As a public company, we are subject to the reporting requirement of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. We are required to establish and regularly evaluate the effectiveness of internal controls over financial reporting. In order to maintain and improve the effectiveness of disclosure controls and procedures and internal control over financial reporting, significant resources and management oversight are required. We also must comply with all corporate governance requirements of NASDAQ, including independence of our audit committee and independence of the majority of our board of directors.

We plan to timely satisfy all requirements of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and NASDAQ applicable to us. We have taken, and will continue to take, actions designed to enhance our disclosure controls and procedures. We have adopted a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics applicable to all of our directors, officers and employees. We have also adopted a Code of Ethics for the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and Senior Financial Officers. We will establish a confidential and anonymous reporting process for the receipt of concerns regarding questionable accounting, auditing or other business matters from our employees. We intend for our General Counsel to assist us in the continued enhancement of our disclosure controls and procedures. In addition, we intend to put additional personnel and systems in place which we expect will provide us the necessary resources to be able to timely file the required periodic reports with the SEC as a publicly traded company. We intend for our Chief Financial Officer, Controller and other financial personnel to lead our existing staff in the performance of the required accounting and reporting functions.

On an ongoing basis we intend to conduct a controls evaluation to identify control deficiencies and to confirm that appropriate corrective action, including process improvements, are being undertaken. We expect to conduct this type of evaluation on a quarterly basis so that the conclusions concerning the effectiveness of our controls can be reported in our periodic reports. The overall goals of these evaluation activities will be to monitor our internal controls for financial reporting and our disclosure controls and procedures and to make modifications as necessary. Our intent in this regard is that our internal controls for financial reporting and our disclosure controls and procedures will be maintained as dynamic systems that change, including with improvements and corrections, as conditions warrant.

Our ability to enhance our disclosure controls and procedures, to conduct controls evaluations and to modify controls and procedures on an ongoing basis may be limited by the current state of our staffing, accounting system and internal controls since any enhancements and modifications may require additional staffing and improved systems and controls.

109

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In December 2010, the FASB issued new authoritative accounting guidance which provides that entities with reporting units with zero or negative carrying amounts are required to determine an implied fair value of goodwill if management concludes that it is more likely than not that a goodwill impairment exists considering any adverse qualitative factors. For public entities, the new guidance is effective for fiscal years and interim period within those years beginning after December 15, 2010. Early adoption is not permitted. We adopted this guidance effective January 1, 2011. The adoption did not have any impact on our financial statements.

In September 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued new authoritative accounting guidance which will allow entities to first assess qualitative factors to determine whether it is necessary to perform the two-step quantitative goodwill impairment test. Under these amendments, an entity would not be required to calculate the fair value of a reporting unit unless the entity determines, based on a qualitative assessment, that it is more likely than not that its fair value is less than its carrying amount. The new guidance is effective for annual and interim goodwill impairment tests performed for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2011 with early adoption permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of this guidance on its financial reporting process.

110

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This prospectus contains certain forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements can be identified by the fact that they do not relate strictly to historical or current facts. Generally, the inclusion of the words “believe,” “expect,” “potential,” “may,” “should,” “plan,” “intend,” “estimate,” “anticipate,” “will,” and similar expressions also identify statements that constitute forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements appear in a number of places throughout this prospectus and include statements regarding our intentions, beliefs, projections, outlook, analyses or current expectations concerning, among other things, our results of operations, financial condition, liquidity, prospects, growth, strategies, the industry in which we operate and the trends that may affect our industry. We have based these forward-looking statements largely on our current expectations and projections about future events and financial trends that we believe may affect our financial condition, results of operations, business strategy, short term and long term business operations and objectives and financial needs.

By their nature, forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties because they relate to events, competitive dynamics, customer and industry change and depend on the economic or technological circumstances that may or may not occur in the future or may occur on longer or shorter timelines than anticipated. We caution the investors that the forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and that our actual results of operations, financial condition and liquidity and the development of the industry or results in which we operate may differ materially from those made in or suggested by the forward-looking statements contained in this prospectus. In addition, even if our results of operations, financial condition and liquidity and the development of the industry in which we operate are consistent with the forward-looking statements contained in this prospectus, they may not be predictive of results or developments in future periods.

Any or all of our forward-looking statements in this prospectus may turn out to be incorrect. They can be affected by inaccurate assumptions we might make or by known or unknown risks and uncertainties. Many of these factors will be important in determining future results. Consequently, no forward-looking statement can be guaranteed. Actual future results may vary materially.

Except as may be required under the federal securities laws, we undertake no obligation to publicly update forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. Under the caption “Risk Factors,” we provide a cautionary discussion of risks, uncertainties and possibly inaccurate assumptions relevant to our business. These are factors that we think could cause our actual results to differ materially from expected and historical results. Other factors besides those listed in the section entitled “Risk Factors” could also adversely affect us.

The following list represents some, but not necessarily all, of the factors that may cause our actual results to differ from those anticipated or predicted:

•

our ability to service and repay our indebtedness, including our repayment obligations in the event of a change of control;

•

the insufficiency of the collateral relating to the Registrable Notes or any failure to record and/or perfect security interests in such collateral;

•

our history of breaching certain covenants in our note agreements and the Indentures and the risk of future breaches;

•

our failure to maintain financial ratios, satisfy financial tests and remain in compliance with the Indentures;

•

the lack of a public market for the Registrable Notes;

•

a court’s ability to void the subsidiary guarantees based on fraudulent conveyance laws;

•

any dilutive effect experienced as a result of purchasing Registrable Shares from the selling securityholders or as a result of future equity issuances;

•

our ability to raise capital in the future;

111

•

the ability of our executive officers, directors and their affiliates to control matters requiring stockholder approval by virtue of their ownership of a substantial percentage of common stock;

•

our ability to continue to pay the increased costs relating to being a public company;

•

our ability to maintain effective internal controls;

•

the volatility of our stock price;

•

the effect of anti-takeover provisions in our articles of incorporation or provisions of Nevada law on any potential change in control;

•

our history of significant operating losses and the risk of incurring additional net losses in the future;

•

our reliance on subscribers to our websites for most of our revenue;

•

competition from other social networking, internet personals and adult-oriented websites;

•

our reliance on our affiliate network to drive traffic to our websites;

•

increased subscriber churn or subscriber upgrade and retention costs’ impact on our financial performance;

•

our ability to generate significant revenue from internet advertising;

•

our ability to maintain and enhance our brands;

•

unfavorable economic and market conditions;

•

our reliance on credit cards as a form of payment;

•

our ability to keep up with new technologies and remain competitive;

•

we may be held secondarily liable for the actions of our affiliates;

•

our reliance on internet search websites to direct traffic to our websites;

•

our reliance on member-generated content to our websites;

•

security breaches may cause harm to our subscribers or our systems;

•

we may be subject to liability arising from our media content;

•

our ability to safeguard the privacy of the users of our websites;

•

our ability to enforce and protect our intellectual property rights;

•

we may be subject to claims that we have violated the intellectual property rights of others;

•

our ability to obtain or maintain key website addresses;

•

our ability to scale and adapt our network infrastructure;

•

the loss of our main data center or backup data center or other parts of our infrastructure;

•

systems failures and interruptions in our ability to provide access to our websites and content;

•

companies providing products and services on which we rely may refuse to do business with us;

•

changes in government laws affecting our business;

•

we may be liable if one of our members or subscribers harms another or misuses our websites;

•

risks associated with additional taxes being imposed by any states or countries;

•

we may have unforeseen liabilities from our acquisition of Various and our recourse may be limited;

•

we may not be successful in integrating any future acquisitions we make;

•

risks of international expansion;

112

•

our reliance on key personnel;

•

our ability to attract internet traffic to our websites;

•

risks associated with currency fluctuations; and

•

risks associated with our litigation and legal proceedings.

113

DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

The following sets forth certain information concerning our executive officers, other key employees and directors as of December 1 4 , 2011.

Name		Position
Marc H. Bell	44	Chief Executive Officer, President and Director
Daniel C. Staton	58	Chairman of the Board and Treasurer
Ezra Shashoua	56	Chief Financial Officer
Anthony Previte	46	Chief Operating Officer
Robert Brackett	34	President, internet group
David Gellen	4 4	Senior Vice President and General Counsel
Robert B. Bell	72	Director
Barry W. Florescue	6 8	Director
James “Jim” LaChance	46	Director
Toby E. Lazarus	44	Director
Jason Smith	39	Director

Executive Officers and Key Employees

Marc H. Bell has been our Chief Executive Officer, President and a Director since October 2004. Mr. Bell has served as a member of the Board of Directors of ARMOUR Residential REIT, Inc. (NYSE: ARR) since November 2009. Mr. Bell served as Chairman of the Board of Directors and Treasurer of Enterprise Acquisition Corp. (AMEX: EST), or EAC, a blank check company formed with the purpose of effecting a merger, acquisition or other similar business combination with an operating business, since its inception in July 2007 until November 2009. Mr. Bell has served as Managing Director of Marc Bell Capital Partners LLC, an investment firm which invests in media and entertainment ventures, real estate and distressed assets, since 2003. Previously, Mr. Bell was the founder and President of Globix Corporation, a full-service commercial internet service provider with data centers and a private network with over 20,000 miles of fiber spanning the globe. Mr. Bell served as Chairman of the Board of Globix Corporation from 1990 to December 2002 and Chief Executive Officer from 1990 to 2001. Globix, which went public in 1996 under the name Bell Technology Group, Ltd. and was renamed Globix Corporation in 1998, offered internet connectivity and sophisticated internet-based solutions to large and medium size companies through a host of vertically-integrated businesses. Globix was an initial investor in NetSat Express, a satellite communications joint venture with Globecomm Systems Inc. and Reuters Group plc, which was later sold to Globecomm Systems Inc. In January 2002, Globix filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy and emerged from Chapter 11 bankruptcy in April 2002 after the United States Bankruptcy Court confirmed its plan of reorganization. Mr. Bell remained the non-executive Chairman of Globix until December 15, 2002. Mr. Bell was also a member of the Board of Directors of EDGAR Online, Inc., an internet-based provider of filings made by public companies with the SEC, from 1998 to 2000. Mr. Bell has also been a co-producer of several Broadway musicals and plays (Jersey Boys, The Wedding Singer, August: Osage County, A Catered Affair) and has been a winner of the American Theatre Wing’s Tony Award (“2008 Best Play” for August: Osage County and “2006 Best Musical” for Jersey Boys). Mr. Bell is a member of the Board of Trustees of New York University and New York University School of Medicine and was an adjunct instructor at the Global Entrepreneurship Center of Florida International University, where he taught graduate courses in Entrepreneurship. Mr. Bell holds a B.S. degree in accounting from Babson College and an M.S. degree in real estate development and investment from New York University. Mr. Bell is the son of Robert B. Bell, one of our directors.

Mr. Bell’s past executive leadership experience with public and private companies, as well as serving on the board of directors of several public companies, allow him to provide valuable business, leadership, and management advice to the board of directors.

Daniel C. Staton has been our Chairman of the Board since October 2004. Mr. Staton has served as Chairman of the Board of Directors of ARMOUR Residential REIT, Inc. (NYSE: ARR) since November 2009. Mr. Staton served as President and Chief Executive Officer and as a member of the Board of Directors of EAC, a blank check company formed with the purpose of effecting a merger, acquisition or other similar business combination with

114

an operating business, since its inception in July 2007 until November 2009. Mr. Staton has served as Managing Director of Staton Capital LLC, a private investment firm, since 2003.

Mr. Staton served as President of The Walnut Group, a private investment firm that has made over 20 private equity and venture capital investments, from 1997 to January 2007. Prior to forming The Walnut Group, Mr. Staton served as General Manager and partner of Duke Associates from 1981 to 1993. With its initial public offering, Mr. Staton became Chief Operating Officer and a director of Duke Realty Investments, Inc. (NYSE: DRE), a real estate investment trust, from 1993 to 1997. Mr. Staton served as Chairman of the Board of Directors of Storage Realty Trust, a real estate investment trust, from 1997 to 1999 and led its merger with Public Storage (NYSE: PSA), where he has served on the Board of Directors since 1999. The Walnut Group was an initial investor and Mr. Staton served as director of Build-a-Bear Workshop (NYSE: BBW), a specialty retailer with over 300 stores, from 1998 until its initial public offering in 2004. The Walnut Group was an initial investor in Deal$: Nothing Over a Dollar, a specialty retailer which grew from one location to 67 locations until its sale to Supervalu Inc. in 2002. In connection with other investments by The Walnut Group, Mr. Staton served as director of Ameristop, a convenience store operator with over 140 locations, from 1998 to 2003, as a director of Skylight Financial, a credit card company for the “underbanked,” from 1998 until its sale in 2007 and as a director of Changing Paradigms, a leader in private-label household products, from 1999 until its sale in 2006. Mr. Staton also invested in and served as a director of United Sports Ventures, owner of three minor league baseball and four minor league hockey teams, from 1997 to 2002. Mr. Staton has co-produced or invested in numerous successful Broadway musicals, and plays including The Producers, Hairspray, Jersey Boys, and August: Osage County all of which won the Tony Award for “Best Musical” or “Best Play” as well as A Catered Affair and Smokey Joe’s Café, Broadway’s longest-running musical revue. Mr. Staton majored in Finance at the University of Missouri and holds a B.S. degree in specialized business from Ohio University and a B.S. degree in business (management) from California Coast University. Mr. Staton has served as Executive in Residence at both the University of Missouri and Ohio University.

Mr. Staton has extensive experience serving on the board of directors of private and public companies and sourcing private equity and venture capital investments and brings significant corporate governance expertise to the board of directors.

Ezra Shashoua has been our Chief Financial Officer since January 2008. From September 2007 to January 2008, Mr. Shashoua served as a consultant to us. Mr. Shashoua also served as the Chief Financial Officer of EAC, a publicly held blank check company organized for the purpose of effecting a merger, acquisition or other similar business combination with an operating business, from January 2008 to November 2009. From June 2003 to May 2007, he was Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Cruzan International, Inc., a Florida-based publicly-held spirits company which owned the Cruzan Rum brand and several manufacturing plants. He was part of the management team that grew the Cruzan brand into a 700,000 annual case premium rum. Prior to his employment at Cruzan, Mr. Shashoua served as Executive Vice President from 2001 to June 2003 at NationsRent, Inc., a publicly-held NYSE equipment rental company. NationsRent filed a voluntary bankruptcy petition in December 2001. The plan of reorganization, the development of which was led by Mr. Shashoua, was confirmed by the bankruptcy court in May 2003. Mr. Shashoua had previously been at 7-Eleven, Inc. where he served in several roles of increasing responsibility over 18 years culminating in his appointment as Chief Financial Officer. During his tenure, 7-Eleven, Inc. went through a leveraged buyout, reorganization and sale. After reorganization, Mr. Shashoua was a leader of the management team that revitalized the 7-Eleven convenience store concept. Mr. Shashoua started his career as an attorney at the law firm of Sonnenschein Nath & Rosenthal LLP in Chicago. He holds a B.A. degree from Northwestern University and a J.D. degree from Illinois Institute of Technology-Chicago Kent College of Law.

Anthony Previte has been our Chief Operating Officer since February 2008. From March 2003 to January 2008, Mr. Previte was Managing Member of Starsmith LLC, a financial business consulting and outsourcing services company that provided consulting services to us from December 2006 until December 2007. From October 1998 to March 2003, Mr. Previte was with Globix Corporation where he served as Chief Technology Officer and Chief Operating Officer. In January 2002, Globix filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy and emerged from Chapter 11 bankruptcy in April 2002 after the United States Bankruptcy Court confirmed its plan of reorganization.

Robert Brackett has been the President of our internet group since December 2007. Prior to that, Mr. Brackett was Interim President of Various from October 2006 to December 2007, when we acquired Various. From 2003

115

to 2006, Mr. Brackett served as Chief Technology Officer of Various. Over the last four years he has spearheaded Various’ infrastructure and software growth. From 1999 to 2001, Mr. Brackett was software developer at iPrint Technologies, the internet’s first online print shop. Mr. Brackett developed software at iPrint to allow the easy creation of custom print shops for many large businesses such as Oracle, Washington Mutual and 3M. Mr. Brackett graduated from the University of California-Santa Cruz with highest honors in computer science and honors in language studies.

David Gellen has been our Senior Vice President and General Counsel since February 2011. From May 2007 to February 2011, Mr. Gellen was a shareholder at the law firm of Greenberg Traurig, P.A. where he was a member of the Corporate and Securities, Intellectual Property and Technology and Media Practice Groups. From May 2001 to May 2007, Mr. Gellen directed the corporate and legal affairs as General Counsel of Pace Americas, Inc., a subsidiary of Pace plc, a publicly held (London Stock Exchange) technology developer of digital technology products for the global payTV market. Prior to joining Pace Americas, Inc., Mr. Gellen was a partner at the law firm of Kutak Rock LLP. Mr. Gellen is a graduate of the Temple University James E. Beasley School of Law where he earned his Juris Doctorate degree. He also received his Bachelor of Arts degree, with high honors, from the University of Florida.

Non-Employee Directors

Robert B. Bell has been a Director since 2005. Currently retired, Mr. Bell served as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Globix Corporation from 1994 to September 1999. Prior to joining Globix, Mr. Bell was a practicing attorney in New York City at the firm of Bell, Kalnick, Beckman, Klee and Green LLP, which Mr. Bell founded in the early 1970s and specialized in the law of international real estate joint ventures and investment. He is the author of Joint Ventures in Real Estate published by John Wiley & Sons. Prior to 1994, Mr. Bell was for over 15 years an Adjunct Professor at New York University. Mr. Bell has a B.S. degree from New York University and a Juris Doctorate degree from the University of California at Berkeley. Mr. Bell is the father of Marc H. Bell, our Chief Executive Officer and a Director.

Mr. Bell’s past position as a vice president and chief financial officer for a public company as well as his many years of experience as a practicing attorney provide valuable insight to the board of directors, particularly as it relates to management, financial and legal matters.

Barry W. Florescue has been a Director since 2005 and currently serves as a member of both the audit committee and the nominating and corporate governance committee. Since 1989, Mr. Florescue has also been the Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer and majority stockholder of Century Financial Group, Inc., a private holding company which, until November 13, 2009, owned Century Bank, F.S.B. a federally chartered thrift institution based in Sarasota, Florida. During that time he also served as a director of Century Bank. On November 13, 2009, Century Bank was closed by the Office of Thrift Supervision and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation was named receiver. Century Financial Group, Inc. was not included in the closing of the bank or resulting receivership. Mr. Florescue has also been Chairman of the Board and President of BMD Management Company, Inc. since 1980. BMD is a privately-owned management services, finance and real estate investment company which has managed fast food and casual dining restaurants and now primarily manages more than 20 commercial real estate properties in Florida, Colorado and New York. From 1996 to December 2004, Mr. Florescue was the major stockholder, Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Operating Officer of BFMA Holding Corporation, a private holding company which owned and operated Marietta Corporation, a company that manufactures personal care amenities for the hospitality market and provides contract manufacturing and packaging for companies in the personal care, cosmetic, over-the-counter pharmaceutical, household care and food industries. Since 2003, Mr. Florescue has been the Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of Caswell-Massey Holding Corporation, a 250 year old company that sells Caswell-Massey brand bath and beauty products through its retail stores, mail-order catalog and website, as well as through department stores and chain retailers. Mr. Florescue also served as Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of Renaissance Acquisition Corp, an NYSE Amex listed blank check company, which completed its initial public offering in January 2007 with net proceeds of approximately $91 million and Mr. Florescue is on the Executive Advisory Committee of the Simon Graduate School of Business Administration and is a Trustee of the University of Rochester. Mr. Florescue received a B.S. degree from the University of Rochester and a Master of Business Administration degree from New York University Graduate School of Business. Mr. Florescue earned his CPA certification in 1970.

116

Mr. Florescue’s many years of experience working as chairman of the board, director or chief executive officer of several private and public companies allows him to provide significant business, leadership, and management advice to the board of directors and committees.

James “Jim” LaChance has been a Director since October 2008 and currently serves as the chairperson of the audit committee and as a member of the compensation committee. Mr. LaChance has served as a director of Horizon Lines, Inc. (OTC: HRZL.PK), a domestic ocean shipping and integrated logistics company, since November 2011. Since 2004, Mr. LaChance has served as the non-executive Chairman of the Board of Northern Offshore Ltd., a drilling and production services company listed on the Oslo Stock Exchange (Oslo B∅rs: NOF). From July 2005 to February 2008, Mr. LaChance served as portfolio manager at Satellite Asset Management, L.P., an investment management fund in New York with approximately $7 billion assets under management. From 2002 to June 2005, he was a Partner at Post Advisory Group, LLC, an investment management firm in Los Angeles with $8 billion assets under management. Prior to that, from 1997 to 2001, he managed a number of hedge funds for LibertyView Capital Management. Mr. LaChance began his professional career as an audit and management consultant for Arthur Andersen & Co. Subsequent to obtaining his MBA, Mr. LaChance worked as a restructuring and merchant banker with Chase Manhattan Bank. Mr. LaChance graduated from Northeastern University with a B.A. degree in business administration and an M.B.A. degree from the Stern School of Business at New York University.

Mr. LaChance has over ten years of investment banking and investment management experience, which allows him to provide valuable insights and advice to the board of directors and the committees, particularly as it pertains to the capital markets.

Toby E. Lazarus has been a Director since March 2009 and currently serves as chairperson of the compensation committee and as a member of the nominating and corporate governance committee. Since 2004, Dr. Lazarus has served as Vice President of Operations for Lumen Management LLC. Lumen Management LLC is the general partner of Lumen Capital LP. Lumen Capital LP is a multi-strategy investment partnership focusing on small and mid-cap companies. Prior to joining Lumen Management LLC, she served in various positions in hospitals and health centers across the United States with an emphasis on developmental psychology and psychiatry. Dr. Lazarus graduated from Johns Hopkins University, Phi Beta Kappa with honors in psychology, received her M.A. and Ph.D. in developmental psychology from the University of Chicago with a focus on neuropsychology and has presented her work at various conferences in the United States.

Ms. Lazarus’ past management positions and extensive understanding of organizational behavior provide important expertise to the board of directors and the committee, particularly as it relates to management and employee matters.

Jason H. Smith has been a Director since 2005 and currently serves as the chairperson of the nominating and corporate governance committee and as a member of both the audit committee and the compensation committee. Since 2007, Mr. Smith has overseen and managed investments for Fortune Recovery, LLC, a recycling company, and BJS Family Partnership, Ltd. and B-Smith Enterprises, companies which own four industrial real estate properties totaling 2.4 million square feet in three states. From 1994 to December 2008, Mr. Smith was the Chief Operating Officer at Hopper Radio of Florida Inc., a consumer electronics distribution business which, among other things, sourced and distributed the Memorex brand of consumer electronics. Mr. Smith spearheaded the Disney Electronics line of consumer electronics which debuted in 2003 through a partnership with Disney Consumer Products. He oversaw the due diligence process in the eventual sale of the business to Imation in 2007. Mr. Smith graduated from the University of Florida with a B.Sc. degree in business administration, with a major in marketing and a minor in environmental studies.

Mr. Smith’s past investment management experience, as well as his work spearheading corporate initiates, allows him to provide valuable business and leadership advice to the board of directors and the committees.

Other Management Commitments

In November 2009, EAC consummated a merger with ARMOUR. Mr. Staton serves as Chairman and Mr. Bell serves as a director of ARMOUR. In addition, Staton Bell Blank Check LLC, an entity affiliated with Messrs. Bell and Staton, is contractually obligated to provide services to ARMOUR Residential Management, LLC, or ARRM,

117

which entity will manage and advise ARMOUR, pursuant to a sub-management agreement and Staton Bell Blank Check LLC will be receiving a percentage of the net management fees earned by ARRM. These services may include serving as a consultant to ARRM with respect to the periodic review of the “guidelines” (as defined in the sub-management agreement); identifying for ARRM potential new lines of business and investment opportunities for ARMOUR; identifying for and advising ARRM with respect to selection of independent contractors that provide investment banking, securities brokerage, mortgage brokerage and other financial services, due diligence services, underwriting review services, legal and accounting services, and all other services as may be required relating to the investments of ARMOUR and its subsidiaries; advising ARRM with respect to ARMOUR’s stockholder and public relations matters; advising and assisting ARRM with respect to ARMOUR’s capital structure and capital raising; and advising ARRM on negotiating agreements relating to programs established by the U.S. government. The sub-management agreement requires the consent of ARRM (not to be unreasonably withheld) prior to any transfer of any membership interests in Staton Bell Blank Check LLC that would result in Messrs. Staton and Bell, and certain of their respective affiliates and other permitted transferees, no longer holding a majority-interest in Staton Bell Blank Check LLC. We expect that Messrs. Bell and Staton will devote approximately ten percent of their combined time to ARMOUR. Each of Messrs. Bell and Staton expect to devote a small percentage of their time to Marc Bell Capital Partners LLC and Staton Capital LLC, respectively, as is required from time to time. While the amount of time devoted to each of these entities will vary, we remain the primary focus of each of Messrs. Bell and Staton.

Composition of the Board of Directors

All of our directors serve until the next annual meeting of stockholders and their successors are elected or appointed, or until their earlier death, retirement, disqualification, resignation or removal. Our bylaws set the authorized number of directors at not less than two but not more than fifteen, with the actual number fixed by our board of directors or by a majority vote of our stockholders. The size of our board of directors is currently set at seven. Our bylaws authorize the board of directors to designate one or more committees, as it deems desirable, each consisting of one or more of the directors, and alternate members thereof, with such powers and authority (to the extent permitted by law and the bylaws) as may be provided in the board resolution establishing the committee.

Pursuant to the indenture governing the Senior Secured Notes and the Cash Pay Notes, the holders of 51% of such notes (excluding notes held by affiliates of Messrs. Conru and Mapstead), are entitled to designate one member of our board of directors (two members if the board shall have more than 10 members) and one person to serve as an observer at all meetings of our board of directors. In addition, pursuant to the indenture governing the Non-Cash Pay Notes, holders of 51% of such notes are entitled to designate one person to serve as an observer at all meetings of our board of directors. Messrs. Conru and Mapstead currently hold in excess of 51% of such Non-Cash Pay Notes). As of the date of this offering, no board designees or observers have been designated.

The election of any of the designees of the foregoing would result in an increase in the number of directors on the board of directors.

Board Committees and Independence

We have established an audit committee, a nominating and corporate governance committee and a compensation committee that comply with the applicable rules and regulations of the SEC and NASDAQ. The Audit Committee consists of Messrs. Florescue, LaChance and Smith, the compensation committee consists of Messrs. Smith, LaChance and Dr. Lazarus and the nominating and corporate governance committee consists of Messrs. Florescue, Smith and Dr. Lazarus. Our board of directors has determined that each of these directors is “independent” within the meaning of the applicable rules and regulations of the SEC and NASDAQ.

In addition, we believe Mr. LaChance, one of our independent directors, qualifies as an “audit committee financial expert” as the term is defined by the applicable SEC rules and regulations and NASDAQ listing standards, which we believe is consistent with his experience.

Audit Committee

The audit committee is responsible for, among other things:

118

•

appointing, replacing and overseeing the work of the registered independent public accounting firm, including compensation and any fees paid to such accounting firm in relation to its services;

•

appointing an internal audit officer to handle the internal audit function of the Company, and reviewing such appointment as necessary;

•

reviewing and discussing with management, the internal audit officer and the registered independent accounting firm our quarterly and annual financial statements and discussing with management our earnings releases;

•

pre-approving all auditing services and permissible non-audit services provided by our registered independent public accounting firm;

•

engaging in a dialogue with the registered independent public accounting firm regarding relationships that may adversely affect the independence of the registered independent public accounting firm and, based on such review, assessing the independence of the registered independent public accounting firm;

•

taking appropriate steps to confirm the independence of the independent public accounting firm, including recommending to the board of directors to take appropriate action to oversee the independence of the independent public accounting firm;

•

providing the audit committee report to be filed with the SEC in our annual proxy statement;

•

establishing procedures for the receipt, retention and treatment of complaints regarding accounting, internal accounting controls or auditing matters, including the confidential anonymous submission by our employees of concerns regarding questionable accounting or auditing matters;

•

reviewing and discussing with our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, management, internal audit officer and registered independent accounting firm, management’s annual assessment of the effectiveness of the internal controls;

•

reviewing and discussing with our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, management, internal audit officer and registered independent accounting firm the adequacy and effectiveness of our internal controls over our financial reporting including any significant deficiencies in the design or operation of our internal controls or material weaknesses and the adequacy and effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures;

•

reviewing and approving related party transactions in accordance with our related party transaction policy;

•

reporting on its activities in our annual proxy statement; and

•

reviewing and assessing annually the adequacy of the audit committee charter.

Mr. LaChance serves as chairman of this committee.

Compensation Committee

The principal responsibilities of the compensation committee is, among others:

•

reviewing and determining the compensation of our executive officers;

•

recommending to the Board the cash compensation of the Company’s directors;

•

granting equity and other incentive awards to executive officers, directors and other eligible individuals under our equity plans and determining the terms and conditions of such awards;

•

making recommendations to the board of directors with respect to amendments to our equity plans and changes in the number of shares reserved for issuance thereunder;

•

issuing a report on executive compensation in accordance with applicable rules and regulations of the SEC for inclusion in our annual proxy statement;

119

•

evaluating the performance of our Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer (and such other executive officers as it deems appropriate) in light of the our current business environment and our strategic objectives;

•

evaluating the need for, and provisions of, employment agreements or severance arrangements for the executive officers or, if so directed, our board of directors or other officers;

•

reviewing trends in executive compensation, overseeing the development of new compensation plans, and, when necessary, approving the revision of existing executive compensation plans; and

•

reviewing and assessing annually the compensation committee’s performance.

Dr. Lazarus serves as the chairmwoman of this committee.

Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee

The nominating and corporate governance committee is responsible for, among other things:

•

leading the search for and recommending qualified candidates or nominees for the board of directors to be proposed for election by the stockholders and individuals to be considered by the board of directors to fill vacancies;

•

reviewing periodically the criteria for the selection of new directors and recommending any proposed changes to our board of directors;

•

developing and recommending to our board of directors a set of corporate governance principles applicable to us;

•

monitoring and overseeing matters of corporate governance, including the evaluation of board performance and processes and the “independence” of directors; and

•

reviewing and assessing annually the performance of the nominating and corporate governance committee.

Mr. Smith serves as the chairman of this committee.

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

Prior to our initial public offering, Marc Bell and Dan Staton served on our compensation committee. Other than with respect to Messrs. Bell’s and Staton’s service on the board of directors of ARMOUR Residential REIT, none of our executive officers serves, or in the past year has served, as a member of the board of directors or compensation committee of any entity that has an executive officer serving as a member of our board of directors. Both of Messrs. Bell and Staton are involved in transactions with us. For more information regarding these related party transactions, see the section entitled “Certain Relationships and Related Party Transactions.”

Code of Business Conduct and Ethics and Code of Ethics for the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and Senior Financial Officers

We have adopted a code of business conduct and ethics that applies to our Chief Executive Officer, our Chief Financial Officer as well as all other executive officers, directors and employees. We have also adopted a code of ethics for the chairman and chief executive officer and senior financial officers. Our code of business conduct and ethics and code of ethics for the chairman and chief executive officer and senior financial officers codify the business and ethical principles that govern all aspects of our business and is available in print, free of charge, to any stockholder requesting a copy in writing from our Secretary at our headquarters in Boca Raton, Florida. Copies of our code of business conduct and ethics and code of ethics for the chairman and chief executive officer and senior financial officers is available on our website at www.ffn.com, under “About us: Corporate Governance.” The inclusion of our website address in this prospectus does not include or incorporate by reference the information on our website into this prospectus.

120

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

The following compensation discussion and analysis provides information regarding the objectives and elements of our compensation philosophy and policies for the compensation of our executive officers that appear in the “Summary Compensation Table” below (referred to throughout this section collectively as our “named executive officers”). Our named executive officers for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010 were:

•

Marc H. Bell, Chief Executive Officer and President

•

Daniel C. Staton, Chairman of the Board and Treasurer

•

Ezra Shashoua, Chief Financial Officer

•

Anthony Previte, Chief Operating Officer

•

Robert Brackett, President, internet group

Mr. Bell served in the role of Chief Executive Officer during 2010 and Mr. Shashoua served in the role of Chief Financial Officer during 2010. In addition to serving as Chairman of the Board, Mr. Staton served as Treasurer in 2009 and played an integral role in the management of our company. Each of these persons is included in the “Summary Compensation Table” below because of his position or role with us, together with Messrs. Previte and Brackett, who are included based on compensation earned in 2010.

Compensation Committee

We have reconstituted our compensation committee in accordance with the rules and regulations of the SEC, NASDAQ and Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, or the Code. For the year ended December 31, 2010, our compensation committee was comprised of Messrs. Bell and Staton and had been established for the sole purpose of granting a limited number of stock options to new employees. Our compensation committee, in consultation with senior management, has promulgated a general compensation philosophy and objectives. Our compensation committee is also responsible for determining the compensation of our executive officers. Our compensation committee is also responsible for reviewing and determining our incentive compensation and equity-based plans, including granting stock options and other equity-based awards. Historically, except for the granting of stock options, compensation decisions have been the responsibility of our board of directors, our Chief Executive Officer and our Chairman of the Board. Following the IPO, the compensation committee, in conjunction with our Chief Executive Officer and our Chairman of the Board strives and will strive to ensure that the total compensation paid to our executive officers is fair, reasonable and competitive.

Compensation Philosophy and Objectives

For the year ended December 31, 2010, we had not established a formal compensation philosophy. Rather, compensation decisions have been made on a case-by-case basis by our Chief Executive Officer, our Chairman of the Board and our board of directors with the goal of hiring and retaining individuals with proven ability and compensating them in a manner that is commensurate with the quality and level of their contributions to our company. For the year ended December 31, 2010, our Chief Executive Officer, Chairman of the Board and board of directors considered a variety of factors in determining the compensation of our executives, including our named executive officers. Such factors include, but are not limited to, prior training, prior relevant work experience and the extent to which an executive officer possesses such skills or knowledge that render him or her essential to our business or difficult to replace.

Our compensation committee is responsible for establishing a compensation philosophy with input from senior management. We expect that our compensation committee will continue to follow the general approach to executive compensation that we have followed to date, rewarding superior individual and company performance, such as meeting certain revenue targets, with commensurate compensation as part of a comprehensive compensation policy.

Role of Executive Officers in Compensation Decisions

In 2010, decisions as to the compensation of our executive officers were made primarily by our Chief Executive Officer and our Chairman of the Board. However, our board of directors was responsible for making decisions

121

regarding the compensation of our Chief Executive Officer and our Chairman of the Board. Mr. Previte, in consultation with Mr. Shashoua, also served a role in making compensation decisions during 2010 through the establishment of bonus pools that were allocated amongst management and staff of certain divisions of our company if financial and performance objectives were met.

In the past, executive officers who are also board members participated in the discussion of their compensation but abstained from the determination of their compensation. Our Chief Executive Officer and our Chairman of the Board reviewed the performance of each of our named executive officers (other than their own performance which has historically been reviewed by our board of directors) periodically but not in accordance with any specific schedule. The conclusions reached and recommendations based on these reviews, including with respect to salary adjustments and bonus payout amounts, were presented to our board of directors, which had the discretion to modify any recommended adjustments or awards to executives. In 2009, our Chief Executive Officer and our Chairman of the Board recommended that Mr. Brackett continue to be allocated a portion of any bonus pool established with respect to our internet division and thus Mr. Previte was primarily responsible for determining Mr. Brackett’s bonus payment in 2009. Mr. Brackett’s bonus arrangements for 2010 and thereafter are covered by his new employment agreement as described below.

Our compensation committee determines each element of compensation for our executive officers. We anticipate that our Chief Executive Officer and our Chairman of the Board will continue to review the compensation and performance of each executive officer other than themselves annually and make recommendations to the compensation committee regarding each executive officer’s total compensation package for the following year. The compensation committee will in turn make the final decisions regarding compensation packages, taking into account such input.

Our board of directors previously approved recommendations regarding incentive compensation and equity-based plans. In 2008, our board of directors approved the adoption of our 2008 Stock Option Plan and agreements to grant options to purchase shares of our common stock to all of our officers under the plan. Prior to the IPO, our compensation committee, comprised of Messrs. Bell and Staton, had the authority to approve grants of options to purchase up to 1,000 shares of common stock to new employees without the approval of our board of directors. In 2009, our board of directors approved our 2009 Restricted Stock Plan which became effective upon the consummation of the IPO on May 16, 2011. Incentive compensation and awards under equity-based plans are now determined by our compensation committee.

Setting Executive Compensation

Due to the unique nature of each named executive officer’s duties, our criteria for assessing executive performance and determining compensation in any given year are inherently subjective and are not based upon specific formulas or weighing of factors. While our compensation committee has a general understanding of the compensation practices of other similar companies and does consider general marketplace information when making compensation decisions, we have not, to date, felt it necessary to utilize the services of a compensation consultant or to do any formal benchmarking.

Executive Compensation Components

The principal components of compensation for our executive officers, including our named executive officers, are:

•

base salary;

•

bonuses;

•

long-term equity incentive compensation in the form of stock options under our 2008 Stock Option Plan and, subject to the approval of our compensation committee, restricted stock following the consummation of this offering; and

•

retirement benefits.

Our compensation committee authorizes payment of each of these components in order to ensure that a desirable overall mix is established between base compensation and incentive compensation. The committee also

122

evaluates on a periodic basis the overall competitiveness of our executive compensation packages as compared to packages offered in the marketplace for which we compete for executive talent. Overall, our committee believes that our executive compensation packages are currently appropriately balanced and structured to retain and motivate our named executive officers.

In 2010, Messrs. Bell and Staton were compensated pursuant to the terms of a management agreement entered into with Bell & Staton, Inc. which contemplates their performance of certain management services. In December 2008, our board of directors approved new forms of employment agreements for Messrs. Bell and Staton. On March 14, 2011, our Board approved revised forms of these agreements, each of which became effective upon the consummation of the IPO on May 16, 2011, and an employment agreement for Mr. Previte, which became effective upon signing. Our board of directors approved these employment agreements in order to compensate Messrs. Bell, Staton and Previte for their efforts in consummating the IPO and for the increased responsibility associated with public companies. Messrs. Shashoua and Brackett also had employment agreements in place in 2010. Mr. Previte’s compensation was previously determined in accordance with a consulting agreement. These agreements are described in greater detail below.

Base Salary

We provide our executive officers and other employees with base salary to compensate them for services rendered during the year. Base salary ranges for named executive officers are determined for each executive based on his or her position and scope of responsibility. The initial base salary for most of our named executive officers was established in their initial service agreements with us.

Salary levels are reviewed occasionally upon a promotion, a material change concerning the company or other material change in job responsibility. During 2010, merit based increases for executive officers, other than our Chief Executive Officer and our Chairman of the Board, were based on our Chief Executive Officer’s and our Chairman of the Board’s assessment of the individual’s performance.

During 2010, in reviewing base salaries for our executive officers, our Chief Executive Officer and our Chairman of the Board primarily considered:

•

the executive officer’s total compensation package, both individually and relative to other executive officers; and

•

the individual performance of the executive officer.

During 2010, our Chief Executive Officer and our Chairman reviewed these criteria collectively but did not assign a weight to each criterion when setting base salaries. Each base salary adjustment was made by our Chief Executive Officer and our Chairman subjectively based upon the foregoing.

While we do not have a practice of re-evaluating the base salaries of our executives each year, base salaries may be reviewed and adjustments may be made in connection with promotions or other changes in an executive’s responsibilities or taking into account internal equities. Messrs. Bell and Staton each received compensation through the management agreement in 2010 and 2009 of $291,666 and $250,000, respectively. We amended the management agreement as of November 1, 2010 such that each will receive annual compensation of $500,000. Pursuant to the terms of their new employment agreements, subject to the terms of our note agreements, as amended, upon the consummation of this offering, the annual base salaries of Messrs. Bell and Staton will increase to $1,000,000 per year, subject to a discretionary annual increase of 10%, in recognition of their leadership roles within our new public company. On April 1, 2010, our Chief Executive Officer and our Chairman of the Board approved an increase in the annual base salary of Mr. Shashoua from $400,000 per year to $480,000 per year, and authorized an increase in the annual base salary of Mr. Previte from $500,000 to $600,000. In each case, these increases reflect increased responsibilities resulting from the expansion and success of our business. Mr. Brackett’s annual base salary was increased from $365,000 to $396,000 in December 2010 in conjunction with the execution of a new employment agreement.

Bonuses

We use bonuses to reward individual and company performance, however, these bonuses vary from executive to executive as we have not established a comprehensive bonus plan. Messrs. Bell and Staton did not receive bonuses

123

for 2010. Following the IPO, Messrs. Bell and Staton are eligible for annual bonuses of up to 100% of their annual base salaries, subject to the terms of our note agreements, as amended. To incentivize Mr. Shashoua to stay with us through our IPO, Mr. Shashoua’s employment agreement also contemplated a bonus of up to 50% of annual base salary, contingent upon his continued employment upon the completion of the IPO. Mr. Shashoua did not receive any bonus with respect to 2009. We have not entered into any formal bonus arrangement with Mr. Previte. In December 2010, in recognition of the efforts of Messrs. Previte and Shashoua in the successful consummation of the New Financing, they were each granted a discretionary bonus of $150,000 by our Chief Executive Officer and our Chairman of the Board. In January 2011, Mr. Shashoua received a discretionary bonus of $233,333.

On November 13, 2007, in light of Mr. Brackett’s role as a key executive of Various, and in order to secure his continued service in the event of a sale of Various, Various entered into a special bonus award agreement with Mr. Brackett pursuant to which he was entitled to (i) a transaction bonus of $207,143 if the contemplated sale of Various to our company closed on or before December 31, 2007 and Mr. Brackett remained in full-time employment until the closing date and (ii) a post-closing bonus of $517,857 payable on or before the one-month anniversary of the closing date. These bonus amounts were paid to Mr. Brackett in 2007. In addition, Various agreed to pay Mr. Brackett a retention bonus of $725,000, payable in three annual installments of $241,667 on each of the first three anniversaries of the closing date, subject to his continued full-time employment on such dates. These bonus installments were paid to Mr. Brackett in 2008, 2009 and 2010. In addition, Mr. Brackett’s offer letter contemplated quarterly bonuses tied to Various’ performance for 2007. For 2008 and 2009, Mr. Brackett had no contractual right to such quarterly bonuses. However, consistent with Various’ past practices, we elected to continue to pay Mr. Brackett discretionary quarterly bonuses during 2008 and 2009. Mr. Brackett’s 2009 bonus amounts were allocated to him from certain quarterly bonus pools which were established based on the EBITDA of Various and its subsidiaries, or Various EBITDA. Mr. Brackett’s bonus payments from the quarterly bonus pools totaled $47,000 in 2009. None of our other named executive officers were eligible to receive allocations from these quarterly bonus pools.

On December 1, 2010, in light of Mr. Brackett’s role as a key executive of Various, and in order to secure his continued service with us, we entered into a new employment agreement pursuant to which his quarterly bonus was replaced with an annual bonus. The bonus was designed to award Mr. Brackett for growth of the internet operations and the bonus includes two factors, top-line revenue and Various EBITDA. The bonus is calculated by adding the positive percentage change in top-line revenue of Various from the prior year and the positive percentage change in Various EBITDA from the prior year, divided by two and multiplied by 10. The resulting percentage multiplied by Mr. Brackett’s base salary yields his annual bonuses not to exceed 100%. Our Chief Operating Officer has discretion to adjust the bonus to reflect personal performance factors, but in no event will the bonus be less than zero. The annual bonus will be calculated and paid within 30 days following completion of our audited financial reports for the prior year. For 2010, the bonus calculation yielded a bonus of 28.1% of base salary, or $111,200. Mr. Brackett did not receive a quarterly bonus during 2010.

Long-Term Equity Incentive Compensation

2008 Stock Option Plan

In April 2008, we adopted our 2008 Stock Option Plan, which was amended and restated and approved by our stockholders on February 1, 2010, in order to provide certain of our employees, directors and consultants with equity-based compensation and align their interests with those of our stockholders. The plan allows us to grant incentive stock options within the meaning of Section 422 of the Code, as well as nonqualified stock options. Subject to adjustment in accordance with the terms of our 2008 Stock Option Plan, 1,343,997 shares of our common stock are available for the grant of stock options under the plan. Shares of common stock issued under our 2008 Stock Option Plan may be authorized but unissued shares or treasury shares. If any stock options expire or terminate for any reason without having been exercised in full, the unpurchased shares shall become available for new option grants.

Our compensation committee will administer the plan and have the authority to grant options, prescribe rules and regulations relating to the plan, interpret the plan and awards and make all other determinations necessary for the administration of the plan. We may amend or terminate the plan at any time, subject to stockholder approval

124

in certain cases, but we may not materially impair the rights of an existing option holder without his or her consent. Unless it is terminated earlier, the plan will terminate on December 31, 2017.

The exercise price of the stock options will not be less than the aggregate fair market value of the shares of our common stock subject to such stock options on the date of grant, unless otherwise determined by the compensation committee in the case of a non-qualified stock option. The exercise price of any stock options granted upon the consummation of our IPO is $10.00 per share based on the price per share of our common stock sold to the public pursuant to the IPO. In general, stock options granted pursuant to the plan have a term of ten years and vest ratably over five years, unless otherwise specified by the administrator. However, the stock options may be exercised only after eighteen months after the date of an initial public offering of our common stock. An option holder may exercise his or her options by delivering written notice to our Secretary or our Treasurer and paying the exercise price in cash, shares of our common stock already owned by the option holder, or by cashless exercise using a broker.

In the event of a change in control (defined as any sale or conveyance of all or substantially all of our property and assets or any consolidation or merger of us or any acceptance of a tender offer for a controlling number of our shares), our board of directors may accelerate the vesting of options, notify option holders that their vested stock options may only be exercised within thirty days after they are notified or provide for outstanding options to be assumed or converted into similar options in any surviving or acquiring entity.

Stock options generally may not be transferred by an option holder, other than by will or by the laws of descent or distribution, and may only be exercised by an option holder, his or her legal representative or by a permitted transferee during the option holder’s lifetime.

In the event of an option holder’s death, total and permanent disability or termination of employment with us for any reason other than for cause or the option holder’s voluntary resignation, the option holder (or his or her legal representative, designated beneficiary, executor, administrator or heir in the case of death or disability) will have the ability to exercise his or her options that were vested at the time of the option holder’s death, total and permanent disability or termination, as the case may be, within three months following the date of such death, disability or termination of employment, but no later than the expiration of the options. However, if the option holder’s employment is terminated for cause or due to his or her resignation, the option holder’s stock options will terminate on the date his or her employment terminates.

In the event that a non-employee director has served his or her full term, any vested stock options that he or she holds as of the date his or her service terminates will be exercisable until the options expire. If a non-employee director dies while serving on our board of directors, the vested stock options that he or she holds as of the date of death will be exercisable for one year following death, but no later than the date the stock options expire.

In the event of certain non-recurring changes in our capitalization or corporation transactions, the administrator may determine the appropriate adjustment to be made to the stock options granted pursuant to the plan.

On July 7, 2008, in order to incentivize our executives to use best efforts to effectuate our IPO, to aid in retention and to remain competitive with the market, we entered into agreements with certain of our executives, including our named executive officers, to grant options as of the consummation of the IPO to purchase shares of our common stock with an exercise price equal to the offering price of the shares of our common stock pursuant to the offering, which was $10.00 per share. With respect to our named executive officers, Messrs. Bell, Staton and Shashoua received options to purchase 50,000 shares, Mr. Previte received options to purchase 37,500 shares and Mr. Brackett received options to purchase 25,000 shares. The number of options granted to each of our named executive officers depends on the individual’s position and ability to influence our financial performance and, in the case of options to be granted in connection with this offering, the extraordinary efforts of Messrs. Bell, Staton and Shashoua. Those with the most responsibility are accordingly granted a larger number of options and our named executive officers will receive a proportionately larger grant than our other executives because our board of directors recognizes that their continued retention and motivation is critical to our future success. We have subsequently agreed to grant additional options to purchase shares of our common stock at the IPO price of $10.00 per share to other high-level employees.

We may enter into agreements to award additional nonqualified stock options to our named executive officers in recognition of their extraordinary efforts with respect to this offering and as an incentive for service during the

125

vesting period. Each option will have an exercise price equal to the offering price of $10.00, and will vest ratably over the five years following the date of the agreement. Each of our named executive officers will be eligible to receive additional awards under our 2008 Stock Option Plan periodically thereafter or in connection with employment terms or agreements. Additional grants of stock options under our 2008 Stock Option Plan will be made both pursuant to employment agreements and ad hoc as to be determined by our Chief Executive Officer and our Chairman of the Board or our compensation committee, as applicable. To date, we have not established any formal option granting policies. Pursuant to the terms of their employment agreements. Messrs. Bell and Staton were each awarded 4,167 stock options upon consummation of the IPO.

2009 Restricted Stock Plan

On March 23, 2009, in order to attract and retain key personnel, including our named executive officers, and compensate them for services provided and to be provided in the future, our board of directors approved our 2009 Restricted Stock Plan.

Our 2009 Restricted Stock Plan is administered by our compensation committee which interprets the plan and exercise discretion pursuant to its terms. Our board of directors may prescribe, amend and rescind rules and regulations relating to our 2009 Restricted Stock Plan and may make and approve all other determinations necessary for its administration. The decisions of our board of directors on any interpretation of our 2009 Restricted Stock Plan or its administration will be final and binding.

The aggregate number of shares of restricted stock that may be granted under our 2009 Restricted Stock Plan is limited to one percent (1%) of the fully-diluted equity of our company on the date that we consummated the initial public offering, which is 393,875 shares. Our compensation committee is charged with administering our 2009 Restricted Stock Plan and all directors, employees and consultants of our company or of any subsidiary of our company are eligible to receive restricted stock grants under the plan. All grants of restricted stock will be governed by an award agreement between us and the recipient. Any such grant shall terminate if the recipient fails to deliver, in duplicate, a signed copy of the agreement to us within 15 days following the grant date.

Restricted stock granted under our 2009 Restricted Stock Plan will generally vest on the third anniversary of the grant date, subject to the Company’s right to repurchase such shares at a price of $2.00 per share upon the termination of the recipient’s employment prior to such vesting date, except as provided in the immediately following sentence. Restricted shares will also vest prior to the third anniversary of the grant date if the recipient’s employment has been terminated (i) by us for a reason other than gross incompetence or certain other types of misconduct; (ii) by the recipient under circumstances that constitute “good reason” under the recipient’s employment agreement (if the agreement contemplates this type of termination); (iii) as a result of a “change of control” of our company (defined below); (iv) by reason of the recipient’s death or disability; or (v) if the recipient’s employment is pursuant to an employment agreement, upon the expiration of the term of the agreement. For purposes of our 2009 Restricted Stock Plan, “change of control” means (i) an acquisition of 50% or more of the then issued and outstanding stock of the company or the power to elect or appoint a majority of the board of directors, (ii) a merger or consolidation resulting in the transfer of the voting power of more than 50% of the issued and outstanding shares or (iii) a sale or disposition of all or substantially all of the company’s assets. In addition, pursuant to our 2009 Restricted Stock Plan, if the grantee were to terminate his or her employment with us prior to the consummation of the IPO, any restricted stock held by such grantee would have been forfeited to the Company, without any consideration paid to the grantee.

Prior to vesting, the restricted shares may not be sold, assigned, transferred or pledged by the recipient. The recipient will otherwise have all the rights of a stockholder with respect to any such shares issued to him or her, including the right to vote them and to receive all dividends and other distributions paid with respect to them. Other than the aggregate number of shares that may be granted under our 2009 Restricted Stock Plan being limited to 393,875 shares, there are no other limitations on annual or aggregate awards under our 2009 Restricted Stock Plan.

The number of shares available for grant under our 2009 Restricted Stock Plan is subject to adjustment in the event of a stock split, reverse split, merger, recapitalization or similar transaction which may take place after the consummation of the initial public offering.

Our board of directors may amend, suspend or terminate our 2009 Restricted Stock Plan in whole or in part at any time, provided that the amendment does not adversely affect any rights or obligations of any recipients.

126

Restricted stock granted under our 2009 Restricted Stock Plan is intended to be subject to Section 83 of the Code.

We have not yet determined when awards will be granted under the 2009 Restricted Stock Plan.

Retirement Benefits

Currently, we operate two 401(k) plans — the FriendFinder Networks Inc. Employees Retirement Plan & Trust 401(k) Plan, which has a discretionary matching component, and the FriendFinder Networks Inc. 401(k) Plan, which also contains a matching component. We have historically elected not to make matching contributions under the FriendFinder Networks Inc. Employees Retirement Plan & Trust 401(k) Plan. Other than as mentioned above, we do not provide any company sponsored retirement benefits to any employee, including to our named executive officers.

Tax and Accounting Implications

The following is a general summary of the material U.S. federal income tax consequences of the grant, exercise, and vesting of stock options under our 2008 Stock Option Plan and the disposition of shares acquired pursuant to the exercise of such options, as well as the grant, vesting and subsequent sale of restricted stock received pursuant to our 2009 Restricted Stock Plan. It is intended to reflect the current provisions of the Code and the regulations thereunder. This summary is not intended to be a complete statement of applicable law, nor does it address foreign, state, local, and payroll tax considerations. Moreover, the U.S. federal income tax consequences to any particular participant may differ from those described herein by reason of, among other things, the particular circumstances of such participant.

IRS Circular 230 Notice. This communication is not given in the form of a covered opinion, within the meaning of Circular 230 issued by the United States Secretary of the Treasury. Thus, we are required to inform you that you cannot rely upon any tax advice contained in this communication for the purpose of avoiding United States federal tax penalties. In addition, any tax advice contained in this communication may not be used to promote, market or recommend a transaction to another party.

Incentive Stock Options

The Code requires that, for treatment of an option as an incentive stock option, common stock acquired through the exercise of the option cannot be disposed of before the later of (i) two years from the date of grant of the option, or (ii) one year from the date of exercise. Holders of incentive stock options will generally incur no federal income tax liability at the time of grant or upon exercise of those options. However, the spread at exercise will be included in the calculation of the holder’s “alternative minimum taxable income,” which may give rise to “alternative minimum tax” liability for the taxable year in which the exercise occurs. If the holder does not dispose of the shares before two years following the date of grant and one year following the date of exercise, the difference between the exercise price and the amount realized upon disposition of the shares will constitute long-term capital gain or loss, as the case may be. Assuming both holding periods are satisfied, we will not be allowed a deduction for federal income tax purposes in connection with the grant or exercise of the incentive stock option. If, within two years following the date of grant or within one year following the date of exercise, the holder of shares acquired through the exercise of an incentive stock option disposes of those shares (a “Disqualifying Disposition”), the participant will generally realize taxable compensation at the time of such disposition equal to the difference between the exercise price and the lesser of the fair market value of the share on the date of exercise or the amount realized on the subsequent disposition of the shares, and we will generally be able to deduct the same amount for federal income tax purposes, subject to the possible limitations on deductibility under Sections 280G and 162(m) of the Code for compensation paid to executives designated in those Sections. Finally, if an option that otherwise qualifies as an incentive stock option first becomes exercisable in any one year for shares having an aggregate value in excess of $100,000 (based on the grant date value), the portion of the incentive stock option in respect of those excess shares will be treated as a nonqualified stock option for federal income tax purposes.

Incentive stock options may be exercised in whole or in part with shares of common stock held by the participant. Except as provided in the paragraph immediately below, if a participant elects to tender shares of common stock in partial or full payment of the option price for shares to be acquired upon the exercise of an incentive stock option, the participant will not recognize any gain or loss on such tendered shares. No income will be realized

127

by the participant in respect of the shares received by the participant upon the exercise of the incentive stock option if the requirements of the plan and the Code described above are met. The number of shares received equal to the number of shares surrendered will have a tax basis equal to the tax basis of the surrendered shares. Shares of common stock received in excess of the number of shares surrendered will have a tax basis of zero. The holding period of the shares received equal to the number of shares tendered will be the same as such tendered shares’ holding period, and the holding period for the excess shares received will begin on the date of exercise. Solely for purposes of determining whether such shares received upon the exercise of the incentive stock option are disposed of in a Disqualifying Disposition, all shares are deemed to have a holding period beginning on the date of exercise.

If a participant elects to tender shares of common stock that were previously acquired upon the exercise of an incentive stock option in partial or full payment of the option price for shares to be acquired upon the exercise of another incentive stock option, and such exercise occurs within two years after the date of grant of the first such incentive stock option or within one year after such shares were transferred to the participant, the tax consequences applicable to a Disqualifying Disposition will apply to the shares used to pay the exercise price. The shares acquired upon such exercise will be treated as shares acquired upon the exercise of an incentive stock option and the holding period of such shares for capital gain purposes will begin on the date of such exercise.

Nonqualified Stock Options

A participant will not realize any income upon the grant of a nonqualified stock option. Upon the exercise of a nonqualified stock option, the participant will recognize ordinary compensation income in an amount equal to the excess, if any, of the fair market value of the underlying shares over the exercise price paid at the time of exercise. We will be able to deduct this same amount for federal income tax purposes, but such deduction may be limited under Sections 280G and 162(m) of the Code for compensation paid to certain executives designated in those Sections. A participant’s tax basis in the shares received upon the exercise of a non-qualified stock option will be equal to the fair market value of such shares on the exercise date, and the participant’s holding period for such shares will begin at that time. Upon the subsequent sale of the shares received upon the exercise of a non-qualified stock option, the participant will realize short-term or long-term capital gain or loss, depending upon whether the shares have been held for more than one year. The amount of such gain or loss will be equal to the difference between the amount realized in connection with the sale of the shares and the participant’s tax basis in such shares.

Non-qualified stock options may be exercised in whole or in part with shares of common stock held by the participant. Upon such an event, the participant will not recognize any gain or loss on such tendered shares. The number of shares received by the participant upon such an exchange that are equal in number to the number of tendered shares will retain the tax basis and the holding period of the tendered shares for capital gain purposes. The participant will realize compensation taxable as ordinary income in an amount equal to the fair market value of the number of shares received upon such exercise that is in excess of the number of tendered shares, less any cash paid by the participant. Subject to Section 162(m) of the Code, we will be entitled to a corresponding deduction. The fair market value of such excess number of shares will then become the tax basis for those shares and the holding period of such shares will begin on the exercise date. If the tendered shares were previously acquired upon the exercise of an incentive stock option, the shares of common stock received by the participant upon the exercise of the non-qualified stock option that are equal in number to the number of tendered shares will be treated as shares of common stock acquired upon the exercise of such incentive stock option.

Restricted Stock

Restricted stock will be considered subject to a substantial risk of forfeiture for federal income tax purposes. If a participant who receives such restricted stock does not make the election described below, the participant realizes no taxable income upon the receipt of restricted stock and we are not entitled to a deduction at such time. When the forfeiture restrictions with respect to the restricted stock lapse, the participant will realize compensation taxable as ordinary income equal to the fair market value of the shares at that time, less any amount paid for the shares and, subject to Section 162(m) of the Code, we will be entitled to a corresponding deduction. A participant’s tax basis in restricted stock will be equal to the fair market value of such restricted stock when the forfeiture restrictions lapse, and the participant’s holding period for the shares will begin on such date. Upon a subsequent sale of the

128

shares, the participant will realize short-term or long-term capital gain or loss, depending upon whether the shares have been held for more than one year at the time of sale. Such gain or loss will be equal to the difference between the amount realized upon the sale of the shares and the tax basis of the shares in the participant’s hands. If we exercise our option to repurchase the shares prior to their vesting date, the participant will realize compensation in an amount equal to the repurchase price paid, which is taxable as ordinary income.

Unless we otherwise preclude them from doing so, participants receiving restricted stock may make an election under Section 83(b) of the Code to realize compensation taxable as ordinary income with respect to the shares when such shares are received rather than at the time the forfeiture restrictions lapse. The amount of such compensation income will be equal to the fair market value of the shares when the participant receives them (valued without taking into account restrictions other than restrictions that by their terms will never lapse), less any amount paid for the shares. Subject to Section 162(m) of the Code, we will be entitled to a corresponding deduction at that time. By making a Section 83(b) election, the participant will realize no additional compensation with respect to the shares when the forfeiture restrictions lapse, and will instead recognize short-term or long-term capital gain or loss with respect to the shares when they are sold, depending upon whether the shares have been held for more than one year at the time of sale. The participant’s tax basis in the shares with respect to which a Section 83(b) election is made will be equal to their fair market value when received by the participant, and the participant’s holding period for such shares will begin at that time. If the shares are subsequently forfeited, the participant will not be entitled to a deduction as a result of such forfeiture, but will be entitled to claim a short-term or long-term capital gain or loss (depending upon whether the shares have been held for more than one year at the time of forfeiture) with respect to the shares based on the net amount of the consideration paid by the participant for such shares and the repurchase price received by the participant as a result of our exercising our repurchase option. To make a Section 83(b) election, a participant must file an appropriate form of election with the Internal Revenue Service and with us, each within 30 days after the shares of restricted stock are received, and the participant must also attach a copy of his or her election to his or her federal income tax return for the year in which the shares are received.

Generally, during the restriction period, dividends and distributions, if any, paid with respect to restricted stock will be treated as compensation taxable as ordinary income (not dividend income) received by the participant and, subject to Section 162(m) of the Code, we will receive a corresponding deduction. Dividend payments received with respect to shares of restricted stock for which a Section 83(b) election has been made generally will be treated and taxed as dividend income.

Deductibility of Executive Compensation/Internal Revenue Code Section 162(m)

Code Section 162(m) (as interpreted by IRS Notice 2007-49) denies a federal income tax deduction for certain compensation in excess of $1 million per year paid to the Chief Executive Officer and the three other most highly-paid executive officers (other than the company’s Chief Financial Officer) of a publicly-traded corporation. Certain types of compensation, including compensation based on performance criteria that are approved in advance by stockholders, are excluded from the deduction limit. In addition, “grandfather” transition provisions may apply to certain compensation arrangements that existed during the period in which a corporation was not publicly held. The board of directors’ policy has been to seek to qualify compensation paid to our executive officers as a deductible for compensation expense for federal income tax purposes to the extent feasible and consistent with our overall compensation philosophy and objectives. However, to retain highly skilled executives and remain competitive with other employers, the board of directors had prior to the IPO and the compensation committee now has the right to and may authorize the granting and payment of compensation that will not be deductible under Section 162(m) or otherwise.

Excess Parachute Payments/Internal Revenue Code Section 280G

Code Section 280G imposes certain penalties on “excess parachute payments” made to certain executives and high-level employees in connection with a change of control. Stock options that are accelerated upon the occurrence of a change in control of our company may give rise, in whole or in part, to “excess parachute payments” within the meaning of Section 280G and, to such extent, will be non-deductible by us and subject to a 20% excise tax on the participant. Our 2008 Stock Option Plan and our 2009 Restricted Stock Plan provide our board of directors discretion to provide for acceleration of awards upon a change in control.

129

New Plan Benefits

Because the benefits under our 2008 Stock Option Plan and our 2009 Restricted Stock Plan will depend on a number of factors, including the fair market value of our common stock on various future dates and, in the case of stock options, the exercise decisions made by participants, we cannot determine the benefits that our executive officers and other employees may receive under our 2008 Stock Option Plan or our 2009 Restricted Stock Plan.

Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation

We account for stock-based payments under our 2008 Stock Option Plan and our 2009 Restricted Stock Plan in accordance with the requirements of authoritative accounting literature.

Summary Compensation Table

The following table summarizes the total compensation paid to or earned by each of our named executive officers (in their capacities as such) in the fiscal years ended December 31, 2010, December 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008.

Name and Principal Position
Marc H. Bell,	2010	291,666	⁽¹⁾	—		22,582	⁽²⁾	314,248
Chief Executive Officer and President	2009	250,000	⁽¹⁾	—		15,634	⁽²⁾	265,634
	2008	250,000	⁽¹⁾	—		5,404	⁽²⁾	255,404

Daniel C. Staton,	2010	291,666	⁽³⁾	—		69,414	⁽⁴⁾	361,080
Chairman of the Board and Treasurer	2009	250,000	⁽³⁾	—		72,296	⁽⁴⁾	322,296
	2008	250,000	⁽³⁾	—		16,316	⁽⁴⁾	266,316

Ezra Shashoua,	2010	460,000		266,667	⁽⁵⁾	—		726,667
Chief Financial Officer	2009	400,000		—		—		400,000
	2008	300,000		—		—		300,000

Anthony Previte,	2010	574,999		150,000		—		724,999
Chief Operating Officer	2009	500,000		—		—		500,000
	2008	475,000	⁽⁶⁾	—		39,149	⁽⁷⁾	514,149

Robert Brackett,	2010	365,000		111,200		—		477,200
President, internet group	2009	337,917		288,667	⁽⁸⁾			626,584
	2008	328,326		413,167	⁽⁹⁾	—		741,493

(1)

This amount reflects the portion of the payment to Bell & Staton, Inc., pursuant to the management agreement, that is attributable to Mr. Bell.

(2)

This amount represents certain subsidies we provide Mr. Bell for the cost of healthcare coverage.

(3)

This amount reflects the portion of the payment to Bell & Staton, Inc., pursuant to the management agreement, that is attributable to Mr. Staton.

(4)

This amount represents reimbursement for car lease expenses and the amount of certain subsidies we provide Mr. Staton for the cost of healthcare coverage.

(5)

This amount includes cash compensation of $116,667 for Mr. Shashoua in 2010 pursuant to his amended and restated employment agreement, dated April 1, 2010, which provided for additional cash compensation of $233,333 in connection with his continued employment through the completion of the IPO. The Company has determined that half of the compensation was earned in 2010 and the other half will be earned in 2011.

(6)

This amount reflects $50,000 in consulting fees paid under a consulting agreement pursuant to which Mr. Previte served as head of our entertainment group prior to becoming our Chief Operating Officer on February 26, 2008 as well as $425,000 in salary related to his service as our Chief Operating Officer.

(7)

This amount represents relocation expenses for Mr. Previte from Los Angeles, California to Sunnyvale, California.

(8)

This amount reflects $241,667 which is the second installment of Mr. Brackett’s retention bonus and bonus payments with respect to the first, second and fourth fiscal quarters of 2009 as follows: $14,000 for the first quarter, $23,000 for the second quarter, $10,000 for the fourth quarter.

(9)

This amount reflects bonus payments with respect to each fiscal quarter of 2008 as follows: $43,750 for the first quarter, $48,125 for the second quarter, $48,125 for the third quarter and $31,500 for the fourth quarter, plus a $241,667 retention bonus.

130

Executive Employment Agreements

Management Agreement. In October 2004, we entered into a management agreement with Bell & Staton, Inc., a Florida corporation controlled by Marc Bell, our Chief Executive Officer and President, and Daniel Staton, our Chairman of the Board and Treasurer, whereby certain management services are to be performed by Messrs. Bell and Staton, or the managers, as designated by our board of directors. The management agreement was originally for a term of five years and provided for an annual fee of $0.5 million which amount was included in general and administrative expenses for each of the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006. On August 17, 2005, the management agreement was amended to limit the total annual fee to be paid to the managers to a maximum of $500,000 so long as any of the 2005 Notes or any guaranty thereof remained outstanding and to prohibit the payment of the annual fee as long as there is a default occurring on the 2005 Notes. On August 23, 2006, the management agreement was further amended to provide that no management fee, other than reimbursement of expenses, shall be paid to the managers so long as there is a default or an event of default occurring on the 2006 Notes. On October 8, 2009, we amended the management agreement to extend the term of the management agreement until the consummation of an initial public offering of our common stock as described in such amendment. We amended the agreement to increase the annual fee to $1.0 million and to remove all other bonus opportunities effective November 1, 2010. The term of the amended and restated agreement concluded upon the consummation of the initial public offering of our common stock. The amended and restated management agreement also provided for grants of stock options directly to the managers, but did not provide for their participation in a bonus pool. An aggregate of $0.5 million and $0.6 million in management fees were paid in 2009 and 2010, respectively, under the management agreement.

Marc Bell and Daniel Staton. On December 9, 2008, our board of directors approved forms of employment agreements for each of Messrs. Bell and Staton. On March 14, 2011, our Board approved revised forms of these agreements, each of which became effective upon the consummation of the IPO. These employment agreements replaced the management agreement with Bell and Staton, Inc. and, subject to the terms of our note agreements, as amended, each agreement provides for a term of employment of five years at a base salary of $1,000,000 per year. This base salary may be increased each year by 10% of the then current base salary. Each employment agreement provides for an annual bonus of up to 100% of base salary, 75% of which will be based on our compensation committee’s objective evaluation of our performance and 25% of which will be based on our compensation committee’s subjective evaluation of the individual executive officer’s performance. Such performance will be evaluated after consultation with the executive within 60 days following the end of the year. The employment agreements provide that to the extent any portion of the annual bonus is non-deductible by us due to limitations imposed by Code Section 162(m), if paid in the ordinary course of business pursuant to the employment agreement, the non-deductible portion shall be paid to Messrs. Bell and Staton (as applicable) after their employment with us is terminated. Messrs. Bell and Staton will each be entitled to receive options to purchase 4,167 shares of our common stock upon the effective date of the agreement and each anniversary date thereafter, which will vest 20% per each year over five years. In addition, beginning on the first anniversary of the employment agreement, Messrs. Bell and Staton will receive annual grants of 2,500 shares of restricted stock which will vest on the third anniversary of the grant date. If the executive ceases to be employed by us, except under certain circumstances, we may repurchase the restricted stock issued to the executive less than three years prior to the executive’s date of termination at a price of $2.00 per share.

Pursuant to these employment agreements, if the executive’s employment is terminated as a result of a change in control (which is defined as (i) an acquisition of 50% or more of the then issued and outstanding stock of the company or the power to elect or appoint a majority of our board of directors, (ii) a merger or consolidation resulting in the transfer of the voting power of more than 50% of our issued and outstanding shares or (iii) a sale or disposition of all or substantially all of our assets) or if the executive’s employment is terminated by us without cause or by him for good reason, we will become obligated to pay him severance equal to the lesser of (i) 2.99 times the base salary in the year of such termination or (ii) the amount of base salary owed to the executive for the remainder of the term of the agreement, to be made in 24 monthly payments, beginning within 60 days following the termination date plus; an amount equal to the executives’ bonus actually earned for the year prior to the year of termination; and the same level of health coverage and benefits as in effect on the day immediately prior to termination until the earlier to occur of the date that such executive is no longer eligible for continued coverage under the Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1985 (“COBRA”) or twelve months from the

131

executive’s termination date. In addition the vesting of the executive’s stock options will accelerate to that number of shares that would have become vested if the executive had remained employed by us until the date twelve months following the termination date. Severance benefits are contingent upon each of Mr. Bell and Mr. Staton signing and not revoking a release of claims. In the event that the executive’s employment is terminated by us for cause or is terminated by the executive without Good Reason, which we refer to as a Discretionary Severance Event, our Board of Directors, without the executive’s participation, in its sole and absolute discretion, may choose to pay the executive the severance payment, payable in 24 monthly payments, beginning within 60 days following the termination date. “Cause” is defined in the employment agreement as (i) a willful failure or refusal on the executive’s part to perform his duties under the employment agreement, (ii) a willful failure or refusal to carry out the lawful directions of our Board of Directors, (iii) willful gross misconduct, willful dishonesty or fraud on the executive’s part in connection with his employment, regardless of whether it results in economic harm to us or our subsidiaries or affiliates, (iv) conviction of or a plea of nolo contendere to a crime other than a minor traffic infraction, following an opportunity by the executive to appear and be heard by our Board of Directors, or (v) a material breach of any provision of the employment agreement. “Good Reason” includes, without the executive’s written consent, a material reduction in the executive’s duties, position or responsibilities; a significant reduction in the executive’s then current base salary or bonus; or the requirement that the executive relocate to an office more than fifty miles from its then current location. The employment agreements further provide that if we determine that any payment or benefit received or to be received by Mr. Bell or Mr. Staton, whether pursuant to the employment agreements or otherwise, would be subject to the excise tax imposed by Section 4999 of the Code, such payments shall be reduced so that the excise tax will not apply. The employment agreements provide that each of Messrs. Bell and Staton is permitted to devote up to twenty percent of his business time to other business activities. Under the employment agreements, Messrs. Bell and Staton are entitled to four weeks paid vacation and reimbursement of reasonable out-of-pocket expenses and are eligible to participate in each of our existing or future benefit plans, whether made available to employees generally or for the benefit of executives.

Finally, pursuant to these employment agreements, Messrs. Bell and Staton are each subject to (i) a non-compete covenant for a period of two years from the date of notice in the event of the executive’s voluntary termination (other than for Good Reason) or a Discretionary Severance Event, if our Board of Directors chooses to make the severance payments described above, whereby the executive may not be employed directly or indirectly by one of our competitors, or otherwise engage directly or indirectly in any conduct, activity, or business that substantially competes with our internet segment, as described herein and (ii) a non-solicitation covenant for a period of one year following the executive’s notice of voluntary termination or a Discretionary Severance Event, if our Board of Directors chooses to make the severance payments described above (other than for Good Reason), whereby the executive may not (a) directly or indirectly solicit, induce, recruit, or encourage any officer, director, or employee of ours to leave the company or terminate his or her employment with us, or (b) for the purpose of selling products or services competitive with us, solicit any of our actual or prospective customers or clients by using our Proprietary Information (as defined in the employment agreements) or trade secrets, or otherwise solicit such customers or clients by using means that amount to unfair competition. Notwithstanding the foregoing, in the event that we do not pay severance to Messrs. Bell and Staton, including under circumstances pursuant to which either of Messrs. Bell or Staton are terminated for cause and if our board of directors chooses not to pay severance, Messrs. Bell and Staton will not be subject to the non-compete or a non-solicitation provisions of their respective employment agreements.

Ezra Shashoua. On September 6, 2007, we entered into an employment agreement with Mr. Shashoua, effective January 1, 2008, pursuant to which Mr. Shashoua would receive a base salary of $200,000 per year with an increase to $400,000 per year upon the consummation of an initial public offering. The employment agreement provided that Mr. Shashoua was an at-will employee, and thus his employment could have been terminated at any time. The employment agreement provided for Mr. Shashoua to be eligible to receive an annual performance based bonus of up to 50% of his then current annual base salary, which bonus was contingent upon his continued employment through the completion of the initial public offering and the achievement of certain goals and objectives as agreed to between Mr. Shashoua and senior management. The employment agreement also provided for Mr. Shashoua to be eligible to receive options upon pricing of the initial public offering equal to 0.6% of our total outstanding equity, with an exercise price equal to the initial public offering stock price. On July 8, 2008, Mr. Shashoua’s employment agreement was amended and restated, increasing his base salary to $400,000 per year and identifying that he would be eligible for a grant of options to purchase 50,000 shares of common stock in lieu of an amount equal to 0.6%

132

of our then outstanding equity, or in an amount equal to other top tier senior executives. On April 1, 2010, Mr. Shashoua’s employment agreement was again amended and restated to increase his base salary to $480,000 and providing for a one-time additional payment of $233,333, which was made in January, 2011. In addition, upon the consummation of the IPO, Mr. Shashoua became entitled to receive a bonus of up to 50% of his then current annual base salary and became eligible to receive restricted stock from time to time. Mr. Shashoua was subject to a confidentiality provision and a provision acknowledging our ownership of intellectual property created by him during the term of his employment. Mr. Shashoua was entitled to at least four weeks paid vacation and was eligible to participate in our health, welfare and other employee benefit programs, including our 401(k) savings plan, and, as described in greater detail below, he was entitled to severance payments on the termination of his employment under certain circumstances.

On November 18, 2011, we entered into an employment agreement with Mr. Shashoua which replaces Mr. Shashoua’s previous employment agreement, as amended. The employment agreement provides for a three-year term commencing on November 18, 2011. The employment agreement provides that Mr. Shashoua will continue to receive his current annual base salary of $480,000, which may be increased from time to time in the Company’s discretion. Mr. Shashoua is eligible to receive a discretionary annual bonus contingent upon his achievement of certain goals and objectives to be agreed to with our executive management, and will be granted equity compensation from time to time under our equity compensation plan, commensurate with his status as a senior executive of our Company. As under his previous amended employment agreement, Mr. Shashoua is entitled to four (4) weeks paid vacation and may participate in any of our existing or future benefits and perquisites available to employees and to executive officers.

In the event Mr. Shashoua is terminated by the Company for cause, due to the expiration of the term or as a result of his death, Mr. Shashoua shall be entitled to (i) his then current base salary earned but unpaid through the termination date; (ii) any unpaid bonus that is earned and accrued for any completed fiscal year; and (iii) any benefits or payments he is entitled to under any plan, program, agreement, or policy (collectively, the “Accrued Amounts”). In the event Mr. Shashoua terminates his employment without good reason, Mr. Shashoua shall be entitled to the Accrued Amounts, and he shall also be entitled to receive his then current base salary for an additional one (1) year period and COBRA coverage if he complies with certain requirements, including that he does not accept employment with or provide consulting services to any web-based provider of adult-oriented social networking, chat or cams services worldwide for a one (1) year period following his termination. In the event Mr. Shashoua’s employment is terminated as a result of a change in control, without cause, or by Mr. Shashoua for good reason during the term, Mr. Shashoua shall be entitled to the Accrued Amounts and Mr. Shashoua shall be entitled to receive additional severance benefits described below.

These additional severance benefits consist of: (i) a one-time lump sum payment of his then current base salary owed for the remainder of the term, except that in certain change in control circumstances the payment amount shall cover at least two (2) years of his then current base salary and in certain terminations without cause or for good reason by Mr. Shashoua, the payment amount shall cover at least one (1) year of his then current base salary; (ii) a one-time lump sum payment of one hundred percent (100%) of the bonus opportunity actually earned for the year prior to the termination year, if any; (iii) the same level of health coverage and benefits as in effect on the day immediately prior to the termination until the date that such executive is no longer eligible for continued coverage under COBRA; and (iv) the vesting of certain of the executive’s stock and/or options will accelerate to that number of shares and options that would have become vested if the executive remained employed by us until the date the employment agreement would have otherwise expired. Although Mr. Shashoua is not entitled to these severance benefits in the event that Mr. Shashoua’s employment is terminated by the Company for cause or due to Mr. Shashoua’s death, the Company, in its sole and absolute discretion, may choose to pay Mr. Shashoua an amount equal to the sum of the base salary and bonus payments referred to in (i) and (ii) above in the preceding sentence. Severance benefits are contingent upon Mr. Shashoua signing and not revoking a release of claims.

“Cause” is defined in the employment agreement with the same meaning as in the employment agreements for Messrs. Bell and Staton discussed above, except with respect to a conviction of a crime, it shall mean the conviction of a crime other than a minor traffic infraction, and with respect to all events constituting “cause” other than a material breach of any provision of the employment agreement Mr. Shashoua shall have the opportunity to appear and be heard by our Board of Directors. “Good Reason” is defined in the employment agreement with

133

the same meaning as in the employment agreements for Messrs. Bell and Staton discussed above, except with respect to a significant reduction in compensation, it shall mean a significant reduction by our Company in the executive’s then current base salary. “Change in Control” is defined in the employment agreement with the same meaning as in the employment agreements for Messrs. Bell and Staton discussed above.

Finally, pursuant to this employment agreement, Mr. Shashoua is subject to (i) a non-compete covenant for a period of one (1) year from the date of termination in the event of the executive’s voluntary termination (other than for good reason) or a Discretionary Severance Event (same meaning as in the employment agreements for Messrs. Bell and Staton discussed above), if our Board of Directors chooses to make the severance payments described above, whereby the executive does not accept employment with or provide consulting services to any web-based provider of adult-oriented social networking, chat or cams services worldwide of a period of one (1) year following his termination with the Company; and (ii) a non-solicitation covenant for a period of one (1) year following the executive’s termination for any reason, whereby the executive may not (a) directly or indirectly solicit, induce, recruit or encourage any officer, director or employee of ours to leave the company or terminate his or her employment with us, or (b) for the purpose of selling products or services competitive with us, solicit any of our actual or prospective customers or clients by using our Confidential Information (as defined in the employment agreement), or otherwise solicit such customers or clients by using means that amount to unfair competition. The employment agreement also requires that Mr. Shashoua keep confidential such confidential information that was disclosed to or acquired by him at any time during the term of his employment agreement. Mr. Shashoua also agreed that any works produced during the scope of Mr. Shashoua’s employment will be our property.

Anthony Previte. On March 14, 2011, our Board approved an employment agreement to be entered into by Mr. Previte as Chief Operating Officer with the Company and its subsidiary Various, Inc., effective immediately upon execution. Pursuant to his employment agreement, Mr. Previte is entitled to a base salary of $600,000 annually and is eligible to receive a discretionary annual bonus contingent upon his achievement of specific goals and objectives to be set forth and agreed to with and by senior management. The employment agreement is for a term of three years. Mr. Previte is also entitled to participate in our health, welfare and other employee benefit programs, including our 401(k) savings plan, our Paid Time Off program and our equity compensation plans, commensurate with his status as a senior executive. Under this employment agreement, if we terminate his employment for cause, we are not required to make any additional payments under the employment agreement, other than his unpaid salary through the date his employment is terminated. In the event Mr. Previte terminates the employment relationship, we will continue to pay his base salary, but not bonus payments, for a period of one year following his termination. The continued payments upon his termination without cause or termination by Mr. Previte is contingent upon his compliance with his one year post-termination covenants not to solicit our employees or customers, his agreements with respect to intellectual property and confidentiality (described below) and his covenant not to accept employment with or provide consulting services to any web-based provider of adult-oriented social networking, chat or cams services worldwide during any period in which he is entitled to such post-termination payments. Mr. Previte’s employment agreement also requires that he keep confidential such confidential information that was disclosed to or acquired by him at any time during the term of his employment agreement. Mr. Previte also agreed that any works produced during the scope of his employment will be our property.

Robert Brackett. On December 7, 2007, we retained Mr. Brackett pursuant to an offer letter. He initially served as the President of Various and now serves as the President of our internet group. The offer letter provides for a term of three years from Mr. Brackett’s start date. Pursuant to his offer letter, Mr. Brackett is entitled to a base salary of $315,000 annually (which was increased to $365,000 in July 2009) and is eligible to receive equity-based compensation and health and 401(k) plan benefits. Mr. Brackett’s offer letter also contains a bonus plan that ended on December 31, 2007, pursuant to which Mr. Brackett would have been awarded a bonus on a quarterly basis, based on top-line revenue and bottom-line profit growth rates. Mr. Brackett’s offer letter contains one year post-termination covenants not to solicit our employees or customers.

In addition to his offer letter, Mr. Brackett executed an Employee Proprietary Information Agreement upon the commencement of his employment with us, pursuant to which he agreed to hold confidential information he learns about us, our work, and invention. Mr. Brackett also agreed that any works produced during the scope of his employment will be our property.

Mr. Brackett also entered into a Bonus Award Agreement with us on November 13, 2007, which was amended on December 5, 2007, pursuant to which he became entitled to receive certain bonuses upon the closing of the sale

134

of Various to Penthouse Media Group, Inc. on or before December 31, 2007. Mr. Brackett received $207,143 as a transaction bonus on the closing date of the Various transaction, $517,857 as a post-closing bonus on or before the one-month anniversary of the closing date, and he also became entitled to receive payment of $241,667 on each of the first three anniversaries of the closing date as retention bonuses, assuming Mr. Brackett’s continued employment.

On December 13, 2010 we entered into a new three year employment agreement with Mr. Brackett, effective January 1, 2011, pursuant to which Mr. Brackett’s salary was increased to $396,000 per year. The agreement also provides for an annual bonus based upon top-line revenue and EBITDA growth rates of Various. The agreement provides that Mr. Brackett is an “at-will” employee and the term of the agreement is three years. The agreement contains post-termination covenants not to solicit our employees or customers for the longer of one year from the date of termination or the period of time payments are being made under the agreement, not to accept employment with or provide consulting services to any web-based provider of adult-oriented social-networking, chat or cams services worldwide for the period of time payments are being made under the agreement and not to use our confidential information to interfere with our business relationships with our customers, clients, vendors, business partners or suppliers. Mr. Brackett is eligible to participate in our health, welfare and other employee benefit programs, including our 401(k) savings plan, our Paid Time Off program and our equity compensation plans, commensurate with his status as a senior executive. Under this agreement, if Mr. Brackett’s employment is terminated by us without cause, he will be entitled to continue receiving his base salary, but not bonus payments, for the remainder of the term. If he resigns for any reason (other than in connection with a termination by us for cause), Mr. Brackett will be entitled to continue receiving his base salary, but not bonus payments, for a period of one year following his resignation.

Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control

Assuming a termination by the company (including following a change in control in the case of Mr. Shashoua) as of December 31, 2010, Messrs. Shashoua, Previte and Brackett would have become entitled to receive severance payments as noted below. We consider severance payments, which serve as inducements to attract qualified executive officers, to be an integral part of compensation arrangements.

Ezra Shashoua. If we terminated Mr. Shashoua’s employment without cause (as defined below), or if he terminated his employment for good reason (as defined below) Mr. Shashoua would have become entitled to receive an amount equal to $480,000, payable in a lump sum within thirty days of termination.

For purposes of Mr. Shashoua’s employment agreement in effect as of December 31, 2010, “good reason” meant (i) the occurrence of a change of control within one year of the Various acquisition, (ii) the relocation of the geographical base of his employment out of Boca Raton, Florida or (iii) the failure of an initial public offering to occur within one year of the Various acquisition.

For purposes of Mr. Shashoua’s employment agreement in effect as of December 31, 2010, “cause” meant his (i) willful failure or refusal to perform his duties; (ii) willful failure or refusal to carry out the lawful directions of his supervisors; (ii) willful gross misconduct, including but not limited to theft, violent work-related behavior, violation of our sexual or other lawful workplace harassment policies or repeated acts of gross insubordination; (iii) willful dishonesty or fraud in connection with his employment, regardless of whether it results in economic harm to us; (iv) indictment or conviction of a crime other than a minor traffic infraction; or (v) material breach of his employment agreement.

Termination				Severance
Without Cause/For Good Reason				$	480,000

For a description of the severance payments payable upon the termination of Mr. Shashoua under his employment agreement dated November 18, 2011, see the description thereof above in the section entitled “Executive Employment Agreements.”

Anthony Previte. Pursuant to Mr. Previte’s employment agreement, effective immediately upon execution, “cause” means (i) a willful failure or refusal on his part to perform his duties under his employment agreement,

135

or otherwise imparted by our employee manual; (ii) his willful failure or refusal to carry out the lawful directions of his superiors; or (iii) his willful gross misconduct on his part, including but not limited to theft, violent work-related behaviour, violation of the Company’s or its subsidiary Various, Inc.’s anti-discrimination and anti-harassment policies or repeated acts of gross insubordination; (iv) willful dishonesty or fraud in connection with his employment, regardless of whether it results in economic harm to the Company or its subsidiaries or affiliates; (v) his conviction of a crime other than a minor traffic infraction; or (vi) material breach of any provision of his employment agreement. If we terminate him other than for “cause,” as described above, Mr. Previte will become entitled to receive his base salary, but no bonus payments, from the date his employment terminated until the end of the term of the employment agreement. If we terminate his employment for cause, we are not required to make any additional payments under the employment agreement, other than his unpaid salary through the date his employment is terminated. In the event Mr. Previte terminates the employment relationship, we will continue to pay his base salary, but not bonus payments, for a period of one year following his termination. The continued payments upon his termination without cause or termination by Mr. Previte is contingent upon his compliance with his one year post-termination covenants not to solicit our employees or customers, his agreements with respect to intellectual property and confidentiality (described above) and his covenant not to accept employment with or provide consulting services to any web-based provider of adult-oriented social networking, chat or cams services worldwide during any period in which he is entitled to such post-termination payments.

Termination				Severance
Without Cause				$	1,800,000

Robert Brackett Pursuant to Mr. Brackett’s employment agreement in effect through December 2010, if we had terminated Mr. Brackett’s employment other than for cause or if he had terminated his employment for good reason, Mr. Brackett would have become entitled to receive his base salary from the date his employment terminated until the date that was three years from his start date (the closing of the Various acquisition), subject to his execution of a release of claims. This employment agreement expired pursuant to its term in December 2010.

Pursuant to Mr. Brackett’s new employment agreement, effective January 1, 2011, “cause” means (i) Mr. Brackett’s willful failure to substantially perform his duties under his offer letter, the Employee Proprietary Information Agreement, or otherwise imparted by our employee manual; (ii) his willful failure or refusal to carry out lawful directions of his superiors; or (iii) his willful gross misconduct, including but not limited to theft, violent work-related behavior, violation of our anti-discrimination and anti-harassment policies or repeated acts of gross insubordination; willful dishonesty or fraud in connection with his employment, regardless or whether it results in economic harm to us or our subsidiaries or affiliates; or indictment or conviction of a crime other than a minor traffic infraction; or (iv) his material breach of the employment agreement or the Employee Proprietary Information Agreement. If we terminate him other than for “cause,” as described above, Mr. Brackett will become entitled to receive his base salary, but no bonus payments, from the date his employment terminated until the end of the term of the employment agreement. If we terminate his employment for cause, we are not required to make any additional payments under the employment agreement other than his unpaid salary through the date his employment is terminated. In the event Mr. Brackett terminates the employment relationship, we will continue to pay his base salary, but not bonus payments, for a period of one year following his termination. The continued payments upon his termination without cause or termination by Mr. Brackett is contingent upon his compliance with his post-termination covenants not to solicit our employees or customers or to accept employment with or provide consulting services to any web-based provider of adult-oriented social networking, chat or cams services worldwide.

Termination				Severance
Without Cause				$	1,188,000

As described above, our management agreement with Bell & Staton, Inc continued in effect until the consummation of our IPO. Thus, we would have been obliged to continue to pay the full management fee under the management agreement if either Mr. Bell’s or Mr. Staton’s employment, but not both, would have been terminated on December 31, 2010. The management agreement does not otherwise require us to pay severance to Messrs. Bell or Staton upon their termination. For a description of the severance payments payable upon the termination of Messrs. Bell or Staton under their employment agreements approved by our board of directors on March 14, 2011 and applicable to periods following our IPO, see the description thereof above in the section entitled “Executive Employment Agreements.”

136

Grants of Plan-Based Awards

There were no grants of awards to our named executive officers under our non-equity and equity compensation plans in 2010.

Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End

The following table sets forth certain information regarding equity-based awards held by the Named Executive Officers as of December 31, 2010.

	Option Awards
	Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options
Name	Exercisable		Unexercisable		Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Unearned Options		Option Exercise Price⁽¹⁾		Option Expiration Date
Marc H. Bell		50,000		—		—	$	10.00		07/07/18
Daniel C. Staton		50,000		—		—	$	10.00		07/07/18
Ezra Shashoua		50,000		—		—	$	10.00		07/07/18
Anthony Previte		37,500		—		—	$	10.00		07/07/18
Robert Brackett		25,000		—		—	$	10.00		07/07/18

(1)

Based upon an initial public offering price of $10.00 per share of common stock.

Option Exercises and Stock Vested

No options were exercised by and no stock awards vested for our named executive officers during 2010.

Pension Benefits

We provide no pension benefits to our named executive officers other than the right to participate in our 401(k) savings plans, as described in greater detail above.

Nonqualified Deferred Compensation

None of our named executive officers has received any nonqualified deferred compensation during 2010.

Compensation Risk Assessment

There are no risks arising from our compensation policies and practices for our employees that are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on our business or operations.

Compensation of Directors

Commencing January 1, 2008, our non-employee directors receive a quarterly fee of $7,500, payable at the beginning of each quarter.

On April 3, 2009, we entered into an agreement with Dr. Lazarus to grant her stock options to purchase 1,250 shares of our common stock upon the consummation of the IPO and we entered into agreements with our other directors to grant each director stock options to purchase 250 shares of our common stock upon the consummation of the IPO. Our compensation committee will establish a formal plan for compensating our directors. In addition, our non-employee directors and board advisor will receive additional options to purchase 250 shares of common stock on each subsequent April 3 anniversary so long as such director is serving on the board. The stock options will vest ratably over the five years following the grant date. However, a non-employee director may exercise the vested portion of a stock option only after that date which is 18 months after the date of the IPO consummated on May 16, 2011. Each option will expire no more than ten years from its date of grant. The exercise price of the option will be the fair market value of our common stock on the date immediately preceding the date on which such option is granted or, in the case of options granted in connection with the IPO, the per share offering price

137

in the IPO. Options are non-transferable except by will or by the laws of descent and distribution. Each such option granted will be evidenced by a written agreement.

We plan to reimburse each non-employee director for reasonable travel and related expenses incurred in connection with attendance at board and committee meetings.

Employees who also serve as directors receive no additional compensation for their services as a director.

Effective upon consummation of our initial public offering, in addition to a fee of $7,500 per quarter, each non-employee director receives a fee of $750 per quarter for service on a board committee, and a fee of $500 per quarter for service as committee chairperson. Also, each non-employee director is be granted 2,000 stock options per year, subject to the vesting restrictions of our 2008 Stock Option Plan.

Director Compensation as of December 31, 2010

Name
Robert Bell	30,000	30,000
Barry Florescue	30,000	30,000
James LaChance	30,000	30,000
Toby Lazarus	30,000	30,000
Jason Smith	30,000	30,000

Indemnification Agreements with Directors and Officers

We have entered into indemnification agreements with our directors and certain officers, a form of which is filed as an exhibit to the registration statement of which this prospectus is a part. Under the terms of the indemnification agreements, we are required to indemnify the directors against specified liabilities arising out of their services to us. The indemnification agreements require us to indemnify each director and officer to the fullest extent permitted by law and to advance certain expenses incurred by the director. The indemnification agreements provide limitations on the directors’ and officers’ rights to indemnification in certain circumstances.

CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

Except as described below, there has not been, nor is there any proposed transaction where we were or will be a party in which the amount involved exceeded or will exceed $120,000 and in which any director, executive officer, holder of more than 5% of any class of our voting securities, or any member of the immediate family of any of the foregoing persons had or will have a direct or indirect material interest, other than the employment agreements described in section entitled “Management.”

General Media, Inc. Transaction

General Media, Inc., or GMI, a Delaware corporation formed in 1993, filed for bankruptcy on August 12, 2003. In September 2003, Marc Bell, our Chief Executive Officer and President, and Daniel Staton, our Chairman of the Board and Treasurer, formed PET to acquire GMI’s secured notes and preferred stock. On October 5, 2004, GMI emerged from Chapter 11 protection with new equity distributed entirely to the holders of the GMI secured notes. The reorganized capital structure also included approximately $35.8 million of Term Loan Notes distributed to former secured and unsecured creditors and a credit facility for up to $20.0 million funded by NAFT Ventures I LLC, or NAFT, an affiliate of Messrs. Bell and Staton. An unaffiliated fund also participated in the exit financing facility. Concurrently with the plan closing, we changed our name to Penthouse Media Group Inc. and PET sold a minority position of non-voting Series B common stock to IBD. This transaction was part of a broader settlement agreement, which ended all litigation among the parties to the transaction and allowed the company to emerge from bankruptcy without further delay. Within a year, all of the unsecured creditors with valid claims were paid in full.

138

Management Agreement

In October 2004, we entered into a management agreement with Bell & Staton, Inc., a Florida corporation controlled by Marc Bell, our Chief Executive Officer and President, and Daniel Staton, our Chairman of the Board and Treasurer, whereby certain management services were to be performed by Messrs. Bell and Staton, or the managers, as designated by our board of directors. The management agreement was originally for a term of five years and provided for an annual fee of $0.5 million which amount was included in general and administrative expenses for each of the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006. On August 17, 2005, the management agreement was amended to limit the total annual fee to be paid to the managers to a maximum of $500,000 so long as any of the 2005 Notes or any guaranty thereof remained outstanding and to prohibit the payment of the annual fee as long as there is a default occurring on the 2005 Notes. On August 23, 2006, the management agreement was further amended to provide that no management fee, other than reimbursement of expenses, shall be paid to the managers so long as there is a default or an event of default occurring on the 2006 Notes. On October 8, 2009, we amended the management agreement to extend the term of the management agreement until the consummation of an initial public offering of our common stock as described in such amendment. We amended the agreement to increase the annual fee to $1.0 million and to remove all other bonus opportunities effective November 1, 2010. The term of the amended and restated agreement concluded upon the consummation of our initial public offering of our common stock. The amended and restated management agreement also provided that we could grant stock options directly to the managers, but did not provide for their participation in a bonus pool. An aggregate of $0.5 million and $0.6 million in management fees were paid in 2009 and 2010, respectively, under the management agreement. On December 9, 2008, our board of directors approved forms of employment agreements for each of Messrs. Bell and Staton. On March 14, 2011, our Board approved revised forms of these agreements, each of which became effective upon the consummation of the initial public offering.

Boca Raton Lease

Effective January 1, 2005, we entered into a lease with 6800 Broken Sound LLC, an affiliate of Marc Bell, our Chief Executive Officer and President, to lease 3,533 square feet of space in an office building in Boca Raton, Florida. The lease, as amended, provided for an annual base rent of $59,646, payable in equal monthly installments. We are also responsible for certain costs, including property taxes, utilities, repairs, maintenance, alterations, cleaning and insurance, currently estimated to be $50,911 per annum. Total rent expense net of sales tax under this lease agreement was approximately $150,000, $112,000, and $110,000 for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009, and 2008, respectively. We amended the lease on November 1, 2010 to provide for an aggregate of 8,533 square feet of space, with the annual base rent and expenses not to exceed $150,000 per year.

August 2005 and August 2006 Purchases of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock

In August 2005, in connection with our offering of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock and 2005 Notes, PET Capital Partners II LLC, or PET II, whose members consist of Marc Bell, our Chief Executive Officer and President, Daniel Staton, our Chairman of the Board and Treasurer, and Barry Floreseue, one of our directors, or their affiliates, purchased 420,635 shares of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock for an aggregate purchase price of $5.0 million, or approximately $11.89 per share. In addition, Absolute Income Fund Ltd., an unaffiliated third party, purchased 252,380 shares of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock for an aggregate purchase price of $3.0 million, or approximately $11.89 per share.

In August 2006, PET II purchased an additional 378,597 shares of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock for an aggregate purchase price of $4.5 million, or approximately $11.89 per share and Absolute Income Fund Ltd. purchased an additional 126,199 shares of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock for an aggregate purchase price of $1.5 million, or approximately $11.89 per share.

August 2006 Purchase of 2006 Notes and Related Warrants

In August 2006, we issued $5.0 million of 2006 Notes and warrants to purchase an aggregate of 441,470 shares of common stock, subject to adjustment for certain anti-dilution provisions, at an exercise price of $0.0002 for an aggregate purchase price of approximately $5.0 million. As part of the transaction, certain owners of shares of our Series A Convertible Preferred Stock and, at the time of the transaction, holders of five percent or more of a class

139

of our voting securities, participated in the offering of our 2006 Notes and related warrants. Such stockholders purchased $3.9 million in principal amount of 2006 Notes and warrants to purchase 344,347 shares of our common stock, subject to adjustment for certain anti-dilution provisions, at an exercise price of $0.0002 per share for an aggregate purchase price of approximately $3.9 million, of which approximately $172,000 was allocated to the purchase of the warrants. In addition, Satellite Senior Income Fund, LLC, or Satellite, owners of shares of our Series A Convertible Preferred Stock and, at the time of the transaction, holders of five percent or more of a class of our voting securities, participated in the offering of our 2006 Notes and related warrants. Satellite purchased $1.1 million in principal amount of 2006 Notes and warrants to purchase 97,123 shares of our common stock, subject to adjustment for certain anti-dilution provisions, at an exercise price of $0.0002 per share for an aggregate purchase price of approximately $1.1 million, of which approximately $48,500 was allocated to the purchase of the warrants.

Messrs. Bell and Staton subsequently purchased Satellite’s 2006 Notes and 2005 Notes. We were not a party to this transaction. These notes were subsequently repaid in the New Financing on October 27, 2010 and are no longer outstanding.

Purchase of Subordinated Term Loan Notes

In October 2004, PET, whose members consist of Marc Bell, our Chief Executive Officer and President, Daniel Staton, our Chairman of the Board and Treasurer, or their affiliates, and Absolute Income Fund Ltd. participated in our issuance of $35.8 million in aggregate principal amount of Term Loan Notes. In August 2005, concurrent with the completion of our offerings of the 2005 Notes and the Series A Convertible Preferred Stock, we used a portion of the net proceeds from those offerings to repay $11.8 million of the Term Loan Notes plus accrued interest. The Term Loan Notes held by PET and Absolute Income Fund Ltd. were not repaid, but rather were exchanged for Subordinated Term Loan Notes with a principal amount of approximately $24.0 million. In October 2006, PET purchased an additional $0.9 million in principal amount of Subordinated Term Loan Notes. Interest on the Subordinated Term Loan Notes was payable in arrears annually at the rate of 13% per annum. All interest on our Subordinated Term Loan Notes was paid in kind.

In August 2006, Florescue Family Corporation purchased approximately $0.9 million in principal amount of our Subordinated Term Loan Notes from PET and Absolute Income Fund Ltd. Barry Florescue, one of our directors, is the president and a majority stockholder of Florescue Family Corporation and has beneficial interest over all the Subordinated Term Loan Notes owned by Florescue Family Corporation. In 2008, 2007 and 2006, Florescue Family Corporation received additional Subordinated Term Loan Notes in the amount of $148,898, $131,768 and $116,609, respectively, as payment of interest for those years.

On October 27, 2010, we completed the New Financing. Pursuant to the New Financing, the Subordinated Convertible Notes and Subordinated Term Notes, with outstanding principal amounts of $180,184,000 and $42,811,000 respectively, together with accrued interest of $9,462,000, were exchanged for Non-Cash Pay Notes. For further information regarding the New Financing, see the section entitled “Description of Notes.”

Series B Convertible Preferred Stock Offering

In December 2007, certain of our existing stockholders, including Messrs. Bell and Staton, Florescue Family Corporation and Absolute Income Fund Ltd., purchased an aggregate of 8,444,853 shares of Series B Convertible Preferred Stock at a purchase price of $0.59208 per share. The aggregate proceeds of $5.0 million were used to help fund the acquisition of Various and for general corporate purposes. The holders of Series B Convertible Preferred Stock notified us in writing that they intended to exercise their option to convert effective upon the consummation of the initial public offering.

In connection with the sale of Series B Convertible Preferred Stock, we issued additional warrants to 15 holders of our Series A Convertible Preferred Stock, warrants, 2006 Notes and 2005 Notes in lieu of the application of the conversion price adjustment provided for in the certificate of designation of the Series A Convertible Preferred Stock and the anti-dilution provisions in the warrants triggered by the issuance of the Series B Convertible Preferred Stock, as well as in consideration for their waivers of certain events of default under such notes. These holders, who at the time of the issuance held in the aggregate securities convertible into approximately 1,737,000 shares of our common stock, subject to adjustment for certain anti-dilution provisions, were issued additional warrants to

140

purchase a total of 2,251,007 shares of our common stock, subject to adjustment for certain anti-dilution provisions, at an exercise price of $0.0002 concurrently with the issuance of shares of our Series B Convertible Preferred Stock.

Purchase of First Lien Notes by Marc Bell and Staton Family Investments, Ltd.

In December 2007, Marc Bell, our Chief Executive Officer and President, purchased approximately $5.2 million principal amount of our subsidiary’s First Lien Notes. In December 2007, Staton Family Investments, Ltd. also purchased approximately $5.2 million in principal amount of our subsidiary’s First Lien Notes. Daniel Staton, our Chairman of the Board and Treasurer, is president of Staton Family Investments, Ltd. and has beneficial interest over all the First Lien Notes owned by Staton Family Investments, Ltd. Interest on the First Lien Notes accrued at a rate per annum equal to 8% plus the greater of (a) 4.5% or (b) the three-month LIBOR, as further defined in the 2007 Securities Purchase Agreement for the applicable interest period. In 2008, Mr. Bell received $0.7 million in interest payments and $0.5 million in principal payments and Staton Family Investments, Ltd. received $0.7 million in interest payments and $0.5 million in principal payments. In 2009, Mr. Bell received $0.6 million in interest payments and $0.9 million in principal payments and Staton Family Investments, Ltd. received $0.6 million in interest payments and $0.9 million in principal payments. In 2010, Mr. Bell received $0.3 million in interest payments and $0.4 million in principal payments and Staton Family Investments, Ltd. received $0.3 million in interest payments and $0.4 million in principal payments. In connection with the purchase of our subsidiary’s First Lien Notes, Mr. Bell and Staton Family Investments, Ltd. each received warrants for 84,342 shares of our common stock, subject to adjustment for certain anti-dilution provisions, valued at $0.5 million.

On October 27, 2010, we completed the New Financing. Pursuant to the New Financing, the First Lien Notes, including those notes held by Marc Bell and Staton Family Investments, Ltd., were exchanged for, or redeemed with, proceeds of the Senior Secured Notes as described in “Note J — Long Term Debt” to our consolidated Financial Statements included elsewhere in this Prospectus. For further information regarding the New Financing, see the section entitled “Description of Notes.”

Letter Agreement with Sellers of Various

The original terms of the stock purchase agreement for the Various acquisition called for the majority of the purchase price to be paid in cash. By early December 2007, it became apparent that we would only be able to raise a portion of that consideration in cash. A negotiation then ensued in which we sought to persuade the sellers to accept additional securities in lieu of some of the cash in payment of the purchase price, which offer was accepted by the sellers. The negotiation was conducted under extreme time pressure due to the deadline for closing the acquisition, which had already been extended. It was impracticable in the time available for us to issue additional equity securities. Consequently, at the closing of the Various acquisition on December 6, 2007, PET, Staton Family Investments, Ltd., Staton Media, LLC, Staton Family Perpetual Trust, an entity controlled by Mr. Staton, and Marc Bell, collectively referred to as the principals, entered into an agreement with the principals of Andrew B. Conru Trust Agreement and the Mapstead Trust, created on April 16, 2002, collectively referred to as the sellers, pursuant to which the principals and sellers agreed, among other things, that:

•

the principals granted the sellers an option to purchase from time to time from the principals, shares of our common stock and Series B Convertible Preferred Stock at the exercise price of $0.20 per share, at any time until the consummation of an initial public offering. The option was subject to a vesting schedule pursuant to which the option vested in part immediately, and in part after each of six, nine and twelve months;

•

in the event (i) there is a default under the letter agreement; (ii) the outstanding balance of the First Lien Notes held by the sellers is greater than or equal to $50.0 million, and there is an interest or principal payment default under the 2007 Securities Purchase Agreement, which is not cured at least two days prior to the applicable time frame within which cure is permitted under the 2007 Securities Purchase Agreement; (iii) the outstanding balance of the notes is less than $50.0 million, and there is an interest or principal payment default under the 2007 Securities Purchase Agreement that has been called for immediate payment by the Required Holders (as defined in the 2007 Securities Purchase Agreement) pursuant to the terms of the 2007 Securities Purchase Agreement; or (iv) the First Lien Notes are not paid in full within 3.5 years after issuance, the sellers shall have the right to require the principals to purchase

141

their outstanding First Lien Notes, in whole or in part, together with the related warrants to purchase shares of our common stock that are then still outstanding, and the principals will purchase such First Lien Notes and related outstanding warrants, at a purchase price equal to the then outstanding principal amount of the First Lien Notes required to be purchased, plus accrued and unpaid interest on such First Lien Notes through the date of purchase;

•

the principals granted the sellers a security interest in all our equity securities owned by the principals to secure the performance of the principals’ obligations referenced in the foregoing item;

•

in the event that, at any time and from time to time, after the issuance of the First Lien Notes to sellers, any seller receives a bid price equal to or greater than 97% of par plus accrued and unpaid interest to purchase such seller’s First Lien Notes and related outstanding warrants, in whole or in part, such seller shall sell its First Lien Notes and the related outstanding warrants pursuant to such bid; and (ii) each seller shall, at all times for so long as it owns any First Lien Notes, maintain with Imperial Capital, LLC and/or such other broker as the principals shall designate an offer price not greater than par plus accrued and unpaid interest to sell its First Lien Notes and related outstanding warrants; and

•

for so long as any First Lien Notes owned by any seller remain outstanding, the principals are restricted from selling, transferring or otherwise disposing of their First Lien Notes except subject to certain exceptions.

On May 14, 2008, the December 6, 2007 letter agreement was amended to reflect the sellers’ decision to retain their outstanding First Lien Notes, instead of selling them, as contemplated by the December 6, 2007 letter agreement. The principals and the sellers agreed, among other things, to the following amendments:

•

the principals no longer have an obligation to purchase the sellers’ First Lien Notes or to grant a security interest in any equity securities owned by the principals;

•

the sellers no longer have an obligation to sell their First Lien Notes at a certain bid price;

•

the principals granted the sellers an immediately exercisable option to purchase from time to time from the principals, an aggregate of approximately 1,000,000 shares of our common stock at the exercise price of $0.20 per share, at any time until the consummation of an initial public offering;

•

the principals are no longer restricted from selling their First Lien Notes. Instead, until the consummation of an initial public offering, no principal could sell, transfer or otherwise dispose of any of our securities subject to the purchase option or permit them to become subject to any liens; and

•

the letter agreement terminates upon the consummation of the initial public offering and the completion of transfer of any equity securities required by the amendment to be transferred.

The December 6, 2007 letter agreement terminated upon the consummation of the initial public offering.

Letter Agreement with Absolute Income Fund Ltd.

On December 6, 2007, Mr. Bell and Staton Family Investments, Ltd., an affiliate of Mr. Staton, together referred to as the principals, entered into an agreement with Absolute Income Fund Ltd. whereby the principals granted Absolute Income Fund Ltd. an option to purchase from time to time from the principals, 128,900 shares of our common stock at the exercise price of $0.20 per share. We were also a signatory to this agreement. The option could be exercised at any time prior to the consummation of an underwritten initial public offering of our common stock or upon the occurrence of any liquidation, merger, change of control, winding-up or sale of substantially all of our assets. On January 22, 2010, Absolute Income Fund Ltd. exercised this option.

Additional Reimbursement Agreements

On October 8, 2009, pursuant to a binding term sheet, we agreed to enter into agreements with each of Messrs. Bell, Staton, Conru and Mapstead effective upon the consummation of the initial public offering, to partially reimburse each of Messrs. Bell and Staton for the sale by Mr. Bell, an affiliate of Mr. Bell and affiliates of Mr. Staton of the options described above and under “— Letter Agreement with Sellers of Various,” which were issued to

142

facilitate the consummation of the Various acquisition and to pay a consent fee to each of Messrs. Conru and Mapstead. Each of Messrs. Bell and Staton will receive cash equal to the product of (i) 37.5% of the initial per share offering price of our common stock in the initial public offering times (ii) 573,982 shares of our common stock that such individual or his affiliates contributed toward the consummation of the Various acquisition. Messrs. Conru and Mapstead will together receive cash in the aggregate equal to product of (i) 37.5% of the initial per share offering price of our common stock in the initial public offering times (ii) 1,147,963 shares of our common stock, which cash will be allocated between the sellers. The reimbursement agreements provide that we will become obligated to make payments to Messrs. Bell, Staton, Conru and Mapstead upon the closing of a public or private offering of any debt or equity securities after the consummation of the initial public offering. Upon such a subsequent offering, based upon an initial offering price of $10.00 per share of common stock, Messrs. Bell, Staton and Conru and Mapstead will be entitled to payments of $2.2 million, $2.2 million and $4.3 million (to be allocated between Messrs. Conru and Mapstead), respectively, in respect of these reimbursement agreements. We are not obligated to make any payments pursuant to these agreements unless the per share trading price of our common stock is equal to or greater than fifty percent of the initial per share offering price of our common stock in the IPO. These reimbursement agreements were entered into as of December 17, 2009.

Grant of Options

On July 7, 2008, our board of directors authorized the execution of agreements covering the grant of options to each of Andrew Conru and Lars Mapstead as of the consummation of the IPO to purchase 37,500 shares of our common stock pursuant to our 2008 Stock Option Plan. These options were issued in May, 2011. The exercise price of these options is the share price offered to the public at the time of our IPO, or $10.00 per share. For further discussion of our 2008 Stock Option Plan, refer to the section entitled “Management — Executive Compensation — Compensation Discussion and Analysis — Executive Compensation Components — Long-Term Equity Incentive Compensation.” At this time, the Company has not made a decision as to whether or not to issue stock options to Messrs. Conru and Mapstead.

Purchase of Series B Common Stock by Strategic Media I LLC

In 2004, PET sold a minority position of non-voting Series B common stock to IBD. In connection with the purchase agreement relating to this transaction, IBD was entitled to certain rights under the Shareholders’ Agreement (to which we are a party), including the right to receive notice of and to participate on a pro rata basis in, any issuance or sale of securities to a related party.

In December 2008, Strategic Media I LLC, or Strategic, a Delaware limited liability company, purchased 1,274,165 shares of our non-voting Series B common stock from IBD. Staton Family Investments, Ltd., which is managed by Mr. Staton, our Chairman of the Board and Treasurer, owns 25.0% of the membership interests of Strategic . Bell Family 2000 Trust Agreement, an affiliate of Mr. Bell, our Chief Executive Officer and President, owns 25.0% of the membership interests of Strategic . Mr. LaChance, one of our directors, and his spouse own 6.25% of the membership interests of Strategic as tenants by the entirety. Upon consummation of our initial public offering, the Series B common stock converted into common stock.

As a result of the transaction in December 2008, we delivered general releases to, and received general releases from, IBD, certain of its current and former directors, officers and stockholders, as well as substantially all of IBD’s creditors. The general release from IBD released us from, among other things, allegations raised in a July 30, 2007 letter from IBD that we, as well as certain of our officers and directors, had violated the Nevada Revised Statutes, federal securities laws, state common law and breached the terms of the 2004 Shareholders’ Agreement in connection with our offering of shares of Series B Convertible Preferred Stock in December 2007.

The purchase price for the shares purchased by Strategic in December 2008 was $36.6 million . A non-refundable initial payment in the amount of $3.6 million was paid at the closing of the stock purchase. Strategic pledged the shares as security for payment of the balance of the purchase price. In light of the current price of our common stock, Strategic has decided not to pay the balance of the purchase price. Consequently, certain creditors of IBD are entitled to demand delivery of the pledged shares. Those creditors have not yet sought to have the shares delivered to them.

143

On December 8, 2011 , Strategic received correspondence from attorneys for certain other creditors of IBD demanding payment from Strategic. As set forth above, Strategic believes that, at this point, its obligations will be discharged upon delivery of the pledged shares if and when requested by those creditors of IBD who have the right to do so under the relevant agreements. As of December 14, 2011, the collective dollar value of the shares held by Strategic was approximately $780,000.

Consulting Agreements

On September 21, 2007, in connection with the Various acquisition, we entered into a consulting agreement with Hinok Media Inc., an entity controlled by Andrew B. Conru. In exchange for consulting services, we agreed to pay Hinok Media Inc. the sum of $9,615.38 twice per month for the term of the agreement, which was originally one year and which automatically renews every month until either party terminates the agreement. On December 6, 2007, the agreement was amended as part of the amendment to the Various Stock Purchase Agreement to provide for additional payments to Hinok Media Inc. of $1.0 million on the first anniversary of the closing of the Various acquisition, $1.0 million on the second anniversary and $3.0 million on the third anniversary. On May 12, 2008, the parties signed a letter agreement confirming the amendment and clarifying that the additional payments would be made on the dates specified in the amendment regardless of whether the original consulting agreement is still in effect at the time. On October 8, 2008, Hinok Media Inc. assigned all of its rights and obligations under the original consulting agreement and the December 6, 2007 amendment to Youmu, Inc., an entity also controlled by Mr. Conru. In the year ended December 31, 2008, we paid a total of $173,077 to Hinok Media Inc. and $57,692 to Youmu, Inc. pursuant to the original consulting agreement, and also $1,000,000 to Youmu, Inc. pursuant to the December 6, 2007 amendment. In the year ended December 31, 2009, we had paid a total of $1,230,769 to Youmu, Inc., $230,769 pursuant to the original consulting agreement and $1,000,000 pursuant to the December 6, 2007 amendment. In the year ended December 31, 2010, we paid a total of $3,230,769 to Youmu, Inc., $230,769 pursuant to the original consulting agreement and $3,000,000 pursuant to the December 1, 2007 amendment.

On September 21, 2007, in connection with the Various acquisition, we entered into a consulting agreement with Legendary Technology Inc., an entity controlled by Lars Mapstead. In exchange for consulting services, we agreed to pay Legendary Technology Inc. the sum of $9,615.38 twice per month for the term of the agreement, which was originally one year and which automatically renews every month until either party terminates the agreement. In each of the years ended December 31, 2008, 2009 and 2010, we paid a total of $230,769 to Legendary Technology Inc.

On October 8, 2009, in connection with the waiver by the sellers of all existing events of default under the note agreements, we entered into a binding term sheet pursuant to which we agreed to extend the terms of these consulting agreements through the first quarter of 2013 and to increase the aggregate fee payable to the furnishing entities in their respective consulting agreements in each respective year by $1.0 million in 2010, $1.0 million in 2011, $1.0 million in 2012 and $250,000 in the first quarter of 2013. The furnishing entities will share in such additional compensation in proportion to each of the sellers’ ownership of stock of Various, Inc. prior to the December 2007 acquisition. In the year ended December 31, 2010, we paid $1.0 million pursuant to the October 8, 2009 waiver and binding term sheet.

On October 27, 2010, concurrent with the New Financing, we amended their consulting agreements to eliminate our obligation to make an aggregate of $3.25 million of consulting payments and our ability to terminate the consulting agreements prior to March 13, 2013.

Confirmation of Certain Consent and Exchange Fees

On October 27, 2010, concurrent with the Issuance of the Senior Secured Notes, the Cash Pay Notes and the Non-Cash Pay Notes, and in consideration of Messrs. Conru and Mapstead consenting to the waiver of certain terms and conditions relating to Second Lien Indebtedness issued by INI in December 2007 and committing to exchange certain old indebtedness for Senior Secured Notes and Non-Cash Pay Notes, we agreed to pay consent and exchange fees to such affiliates of Conru and Mapstead as follows: $1.0 million was paid in December 2010, $1.0 million will be paid by December 31, 2011, $1.0 million will be paid by December 31, 2012 and $250,000 will be paid by March 31, 2013.

144

Binding Term Sheet

On October 8, 2009, we, INI and Messrs. Bell and Staton entered into a binding term sheet with each of the sellers and certain of their affiliates, and it was amended on October 27, 2010 in connection with the New Financing. Pursuant to this term sheet, we agreed to settle and release all indemnity claims against the sellers by adjusting the original principal amount of the Subordinated Convertible Notes to $156.0 million. In addition, the sellers agreed to make available to us, to pay VAT and certain VAT-related expenses, $10.0 million held in a working capital escrow established at the closing of the Various transaction. As of December 31, 2010, a total of $10.0 million has been released from the escrow to reimburse us for VAT-related expenses already incurred. If the actual costs to us of eliminating the VAT liability are less than $29.0 million, after applying amounts from the working capital escrow, then the principal amount of the Non-Cash Pay Notes (notes issued in exchange for the Subordinated Convertible Notes in the New Financing) will be increased by the issuance of new Non-Cash Pay Notes to reflect the difference between $29.0 million and the actual VAT liability, plus interest on such difference.

Further, Messrs. Bell and Staton have each agreed to treat all obligations owing to them and their affiliates pursuant to the Subordinated Term Loan Notes on a pari passu basis with the Subordinated Convertible Notes. We have agreed to negotiate in good faith to formalize the agreements in the binding term sheet in definitive documents. On October 27, 2010, we completed the New Financing. The Subordinated Convertible Notes and the Subordinated Term Loan Notes were exchanged for Non-Cash Pay Notes. For further information regarding the New Financing, see the section entitled “Description of Notes.”

Waiver Fees and Extension Fees paid in 2010

We paid holders of the INI First Lien Notes and INI Second Lien Subordinated Secured Notes approximately $2.6 million in waiver fees on March 31, 2010. On an aggregate basis, Messrs. Bell and Staton and their respective affiliates who were holders received their pro-rata shares in the amount of $36,000 and $36,000, respectively, and Mr. Conru and Mr. Mapstead received their pro-rata shares in the amount of $1.4 million and $0.1 million, respectively.

On June 28, 2010, we agreed, after arms-length negotiations with a non-affiliate holders of the notes, to pay a 1.0% fee of approximately $463,000 to obtain an option to require the noteholders to extend the maturity date of the FFN Senior Term Notes (the “FFN Senior Term Notes”) to January 1, 2011. On October 27, 2010, we completed the New Financing. The FFN Senior Term Notes were repaid on October 27, 2010. On an aggregate basis, Messrs. Bell and Staton and their respective affiliates received their pro rata portion in the amount of approximately $130,000.

Exchange for Senior Secured Notes by Marc H. Bell, Staton Family Investments, Ltd. and the Andrew C. Conru Trust and of Cash Pay Notes by Marc H. Bell and Staton Family Investments, Ltd.

In October 2010, Mr. Bell exchanged approximately $3,656,000, Staton Family Investments, Ltd., of which Mr. Staton is president, exchanged approximately $3,656,000, and the Andrew C. Conru Trust, of which Mr. Conru is the trustee, exchanged approximately $98.0 million in principal amount of INI First Lien Notes and INI Second Lien Subordinated Secured Notes, for approximately $3,730,000, $3,730,000 and $100.0 million of Senior Secured Notes, respectively, representing a 2% exchange premium. Mr. Bell also exchanged approximately $6,751,000 and Staton Family Investments, Ltd. also exchanged approximately $6,751,000 in principal amount of 2005 Notes and 2006 Notes, for $6,889,000 and $6,889,000, respectively, for Cash Pay Notes, representing a 2% exchange premium. After discussing and negotiating the exchange ratios with unaffiliated third parties, we determined that the 2% exchange premium was a key deal term necessary to incentive the parties to effect the exchange. Mr. Staton is president of Staton Family Investments, Ltd. and has beneficial interest over all the Senior Secured Notes and Cash Pay Notes owned by Staton Family Investments, Ltd. On December 31, 2010, we paid $0.1 million, $0.1 million and $2.5 million of cash interest on the Senior Secured Notes to Mr. Bell, Staton Family Investments Ltd. and the Andrew C. Conru Trust, respectively. On February 4, 2011, we paid $0.1 million, $0.1 million and $3.4 million of principal payments, representing cash payments of 102% of principal, to Mr. Bell, Staton Family Investments, Ltd. and the Andrew C. Conru Trust, respectively. On March 3, 2011 we paid $0.05 million, $0.05 million and $1.3 million of principal payments, representing cash payment of 102% of principal to each Mr. Bell, Staton Family Investments, Ltd. and the Andrew C. Conru Trust, respectively. In addition, on December 31, 2010, we paid $0.2

145

million of cash interest on the Cash Pay Notes to each of Mr. Bell and Mr. Staton. On February 4, 2011, we paid $0.2 million of principal payments representing cash payments of 102% of principal to each of Mr. Bell and the Staton Family Investments Ltd. On March 3, 2011 we paid $0.1 million and $0.1 million of principal payments representing cash payments of 102% of principal to each Mr. Bell and Staton Family Investments Ltd. Upon the consummation of the initial public offering, based upon an initial public offering price of $10.00 per share of common stock, Messrs. Bell, Staton and Conru would receive $1.5 million, $1.5 million and $14.2 million, respectively, in connection with the redemption of their Senior Secured Notes and Cash Pay Notes.

Prior to the New Financing, we received commitments from certain holders of the New First Lien Notes and Second Lien Subordinated Secured Notes to exchange for or otherwise acquire $207.0 million of Senior Secured Notes in the aggregate. We agreed, after arms-length negotiations with non-affiliate holders of the notes, to pay a cash commitment fee of 1.0% of each lender’s commitment and to issue additional INI First Lien Notes (the “Additional INI First Lien Notes”) to such lenders in a principal amount of 4.0% of such lender’s commitment (which was deemed to be earned at the time of such lender’s commitment) and in a principal amount of 0.5% per month of such lender’s commitment beginning on May 1, June 1, or August 1, 2010 (depending on the lender) and ending on the expiration date of such lender’s commitment (which were deemed to be earned on the last day of each month during the commitment term). The Additional INI First Lien Notes were required to be issued on the earlier of the consummation of the New Financing and the expiration date of such lender’s commitment. These Additional INI First Lien Notes were exchanged for Senior Secured Notes as part of this New Financing. On an aggregate basis, Mssrs. Staton and Bell and their respective affiliates received their pro-rata shares in the amount of $35,000 each in cash and accrued $0.2 million each of Additional INI First Lien Notes, and Conru and Mapstead received their pro-rata portion in the amount of $1.1 million and $32,000 in cash, respectively, and accrued $7.3 million and $0.2 million, respectively, of Additional INI First Lien Notes as of the New Financing.

Prior to the New Financing, certain of the holders of the 2005 Notes and 2006 Notes agreed as part of the New Financing to exchange their existing 2005 Notes and 2006 Notes into Senior Secured Notes, and the affiliated holders of the 2005 Notes and 2006 Notes agreed to receive Cash Pay Notes. We agreed, after arms-length negotiations with non-affiliate holders of the 2005 Notes and 2006 Notes, to pay a fee in connection with, and in partial consideration for such commitments, a cash fee of 3.0% of such lender’s commitment upon the execution of the commitment letter, plus an additional 0.5% per month of such lender’s commitment beginning on May 1, and ending on the expiration date of such lender’s commitment. On an aggregate basis, Messrs. Staton and Bell and their respective affiliates received their pro-rata portion in the amount of $0.4 million each, through the New Financing.

Exchange for Non-Cash Pay Notes by Marc Bell, Staton Family Investments, Ltd., each of the Sellers and Florescue Family Corporation

In October 2010, Mr. Bell exchanged approximately $20.7 million, Staton Family Investments, Ltd. exchanged approximately $20.7 million, PET Capital Partners I LLC exchanged approximately $1.2 million and Florescue Family Corporation exchanged approximately $1.7 million in principal amount of Subordinated Term Loan Notes, while the Andrew C. Conru Trust exchanged approximately $157.2 million and the Mapstead Trust, of which Mr. Mapstead is one of the trustees, exchanged approximately $26.5 million, in principal amount of Subordinated Convertible Notes for equivalent amounts of Non-Cash Pay Notes, representing a 1-for-1 exchange. After discussing and negotiating the exchange ratios with Messrs. Bell, Staton, Conru and Mapstead, we settled upon a 1-to-1 exchange ratio so that Messrs. Bell, Staton, Conru and Mapstead would have identical economic terms post-exchange. All of the Subordinated Convertible Notes and Subordinated Term Notes, with outstanding principal amounts of $180.1 million and $42.8 million respectively, together with accrued interest, were exchanged for $232.5 million in principal amount of Non-Cash Pay Notes. Mr. Bell and Staton Family Investments, Ltd. are members and the majority stockholders of PET Capital Partners I LLC and have beneficial interest over 99% of the Non-Cash Pay Notes owned by PET Capital Partners I LLC. Barry Florescue, one of our directors, is the president and a majority stockholder of Florescue Family Corporation and has beneficial interest over all the Non-Cash Pay Notes owned by Florescue Family Corporation. On December 31, 2010, we issued $0.4 million, $0.4 million, $3.2 million, $0.5 million and $0.04 million of additional Non-Cash Pay Notes to Mr. Bell, Staton Family Investments, Ltd., Andrew C. Conru Trust, Mapstead Trust and the Florescue Family Corporation, respectively. We do not expect to make any payments in respect of the Non-Cash Pay Notes.

146

Sale of Notes by Marc H. Bell and Staton Family Investments Ltd.

Mr. Bell, Staton Family Investments, Ltd. and PET Capital Partners II LLC have each sold their principal holdings of Non-Cash Pay Notes, which amounted to $21.2 million, $21.2 million and $1.3 million respectively, to unaffiliated third parties in a negotiated transaction. In addition, Mr. Bell and Staton Family Investments Ltd. have each sold their principal holdings of First Lien Notes, which amounted to $3.6 million, and $3.6 million, respectively, to unaffiliated third parties. The rationale for the sales was to rebalance their investment portfolios and to pay tax liabilities incurred as a result of the New Financing.

Current Debt Holdings by Marc H. Bell and Staton Family Investments, Ltd.

As of December 14 , 2011, Mr. Bell and Staton Family Investments, Ltd. held principal amounts of our debt as follows:

Entity				Cash Pay Notes
Marc H. Bell				$5.3 million
Staton Family Investments Ltd.				$5.3 million

Board Designees and Observers

Pursuant to the Indenture governing the Senior Secured Notes and the Cash Pay Notes, the holders of 51% of such notes (excluding notes held by affiliates of Messrs. Conru and Mapstead), are entitled to designate one member of our board of directors (two members if the board shall have more than 10 members) and one person to serve as an observer at all meetings of our board of directors. In addition, pursuant to the Indenture governing the Non-Cash Pay Notes, holders of 51% of such notes are entitled to designate one person to serve as an observer at all meetings of our board of directors. (Conru and Mapstead currently hold in excess of 51% of such Non-Cash Pay Notes). As of the date of this registration statement, no board designees or observers have been designated.

Family Relationships

Marc Bell, our Chief Executive Officer, President and a director is the son of Robert B. Bell, one of our directors.

Related Party Policy and Audit Committee Charter

We have established a related party transaction policy, which became effective upon the consummation of the initial public offering, which provides procedures for the review of transactions with a value in excess of $120,000 in any year between us and any covered person having a direct or indirect material interest with certain exceptions. Covered persons include any director, executive officer, director nominee, a holder of more than 5% of any class of our voting securities or any of the immediate family members of the foregoing. Any such related party transactions will require advance approval by a majority of our independent directors or a majority of the members of a committee constituted solely of our independent directors as such approval may be delegated by the board of directors from time to time. Our board of directors has delegated the review and approval of related party transactions to our audit committee effective upon the consummation of the initial public offering. In addition, our audit committee charter provides that the audit committee will review and approve all related party transactions.

147

SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF
CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT

The following table sets forth, as of December 14 , 2011, information regarding the beneficial ownership of our common stock by each director, each named executive officer, all of the directors and executive officers as a group, and each other person or entity known to us to be the beneficial owner of more than five percent of our common stock. Unless noted otherwise, the corporate address of each person listed below is 6800 Broken Sound Parkway, Suite 200 Boca Raton Florida 33487.

Beneficial ownership of shares is determined under the rules of the SEC and generally includes any shares over which a person exercises sole or shared voting or investment power. Except as indicated by footnote, and subject to applicable community property laws, each person identified in the table possesses sole voting and investment power with respect to all voting securities held by them. In determining the number and percentage of shares beneficially owned by each person, shares that may be acquired by such person through the exercise of options, warrants or rights or through the conversion of a security within 60 days of December 14 , 2011 are deemed to be outstanding shares for such person but are not deemed to be outstanding for such purpose for all other stockholders.

Name and Address of Beneficial Owner
Directors and Executive Officers:
Daniel C. Staton	6,606,020	⁽²⁾	21.2	%
Marc H. Bell	5,147,671	⁽³⁾	16.5	%
Robert Brackett	—		—
Anthony Previte	—		—
Ezra Shashoua	10,000	⁽⁴⁾	†
Robert B. Bell	—		—
Barry Florescue	1,148,302	⁽⁵⁾	3.7	%
Jim LaChance	—		—
Toby E. Lazarus	—		—
Jason H. Smith	—		—
Directors and Executive Officers as a group (11 persons)	12,911,993		41.4	%

5% Stockholders:
Absolute Income Fund, L.P.	1,991,703	⁽⁶⁾	6.4	%
Andrew B. Conru Trust Agreement.	8,860,991	⁽⁷⁾	24.2	%
Global Investment Ventures LLC.	5,687,990	⁽⁸⁾	15.9	%
Staton Family Perpetual Trust.	1,688,970	⁽⁹⁾	5.4	%
Staton Family Investments Ltd.	4,707,058	⁽¹⁰⁾	15.1	%

†

The person beneficially owns less than 1% of FriendFinder’s outstanding common stock.

(1)

Based on 31,219,644 shares of our common stock outstanding as of December 14 , 2011.

(2)

Shares of common stock beneficially owned include: 59,997 shares of common stock, 3,432,893 shares of common stock owned by Staton Family Investments, Ltd.; 1,274,165 shares of common stock purchased from IBD by Strategic Media LLC over which Staton Family Investments, Ltd. holds sole dispositive and voting power; 149,995 shares of common stock owned by Staton Media LLC; and 1,688,970 shares of common stock owned by Staton Family Perpetual Trust. Mr. Staton is a member of Staton Family Investments, Ltd. and has voting and investment power over its shares. Mr. Staton is a member and the manager of Staton Media LLC and has voting and investment power over its shares. Mr. Staton is also the trustee of Staton Family Perpetual Trust and has voting and investment power over its shares, which are held in trust for the benefit of his minor children.

(3)

Shares of common stock beneficially owned include: 5,147,671 shares of common stock. Shares of common stock beneficially owned do not include 184,190 shares of common stock held by the Bell Family 2003 Charitable Lead Annuity Trust for which Mr. Bell does not hold voting or dispositive power.

(4)

These shares are owned by The Shashoua Children’s Trust UAD January 1, 1994, Abraham Shashoua, Trustee.

148

(5)

Shares of common stock beneficially owned include: 1,086,366 shares of common stock owned by Florescue Family Corporation and 61,936 shares of common stock issuable upon the conversion of its Non-Cash Pay Notes. Mr. Florescue is President of Florescue Family Corporation and has voting and investment power over its shares.

(6)

Shares of common stock beneficially owned include: 1,991,703 shares of common stock. Income Fund GP Limited (“IFGPL”) is the general partner of Absolute Income Fund, L.P. and has shared voting and dispositive power over the shares held by Absolute Income Fund, L.P. Ben Christian Rispoli is the sole director of IFGPL. Greymoor International Limited is the sole shareholder of IFGPL and is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Neville Holdings Group Limited. Olivier Claude Michel Bassou and Olivier Pierre Adam are the directors of Greymoor International Limited and Neville Holdings Group Limited. Mr. Rispoli, Mr. Bassou and Mr. Adam share voting and dispositive power over the shares held by Absolute Income Fund, L.P. The address of Absolute Income Fund, L.P. is Suite 4-213-4 Governors Square, PO Box 31298, Grand Cayman, KY1-1206, Cayman Islands.

(7)

Shares of common stock beneficially owned include: 3,380,879 shares of common stock and 5,480,112 shares of common stock issuable upon the conversion of its Non-Cash Pay Notes. To the best of our knowledge, Andrew Conru holds investment and voting power over the securities held by the Andrew B. Conru Trust Agreement. The address of the Andrew B. Conru Trust Agreement is 2125 1st Avenue #2904, Seattle, Washington 98121.

(8)

This number is based solely on the Schedule 13D filed with the SEC on September 16, 2011 by Global Investment Ventures LLC (“Global Investment”). The shares of common stock beneficially owned include vested warrants to purchase 4,500,170 shares of common stock. According to the Schedule 13D, Global Investment shares voting and dispositive power with Anthony Bobulinski, the managing member and sole member of Global Investment. The principal business address of Global Investment is 10330 Santa Monica Blvd., Los Angeles, CA 90025.

(9)

Shares of common stock beneficially owned include: 1,688,970 shares of common stock. Mr. Staton is the trustee of Staton Family Perpetual Trust and has voting and investment power over its shares, which are held in trust for the benefit of his minor children. The address for Staton Family Perpetual Trust is 6800 Broken Sound Parkway, Boca Raton, FL 33487.

(10)

Shares of common stock beneficially owned include: 3,432,893 shares of common stock and 1,274,165 shares of common stock purchased from IBD by Strategic Media LLC over which Staton Family Investments, Ltd. holds sole dispositive and voting power. Mr. Staton is a member of Staton Family Investments, Ltd. and has voting and investment power over its shares. The address for Staton Family Investments, Ltd. is 6800 Broken Sound Parkway, Boca Raton, FL 33487.

149

PLAN OF DISTRIBUTION

We are registering the Registrable Notes and Registrable Shares to permit the resale of these securities by the selling securityholders from time to time after the date of this prospectus. We will not receive any of the proceeds from the sale by the selling securityholders of the Registrable Notes or Registrable Shares. No consideration will be paid in connection with the conversion of the Non-Cash Pay Notes to Note Shares.

We will bear all fees and expenses incident to registering the Registrable Notes and Registrable Shares. The selling securityholders will pay all underwriting discounts and commissions and agent’s commissions, if any. These discounts, concessions or commissions as to any particular underwriter, broker-dealer or agent may be in excess of those customary in the types of transactions involved.

The selling securityholders, or their pledgees, donees, transferees, or any of their successors in interest selling shares received from a named selling securityholder as a gift, partnership distribution or other non-sale-related transfer after the date of this prospectus (all of whom may be selling securityholders), may sell the securities from time to time on any stock exchange or automated interdealer quotation system on which the securities are listed, in the over-the-counter market, in privately negotiated transactions or otherwise, at fixed prices that may be changed, at market prices prevailing at the time of sale, at prices related to prevailing market prices or at prices otherwise negotiated. The selling securityholders may sell the securities by one or more of the following methods, without limitation:

(a) block trades in which the broker or dealer so engaged will attempt to sell the securities as agent but may position and resell a portion of the block as principal to facilitate the transaction;

(b) purchases by a broker or dealer as principal and resale by the broker or dealer for its own account pursuant to this prospectus;

(d) ordinary brokerage transactions and transactions in which the broker solicits purchases;

(e) privately negotiated transactions;

(f) short sales;

(g) through the writing of options on the securities, whether or not the options are listed on an options exchange;

(h) through the distribution of the securities by any selling securityholder to its partners, members or stockholders;

(i) one or more underwritten offerings on a firm commitment or best efforts basis; and

(j) any combination of any of these methods of sale or by any other legally available means.

We do not know of any arrangements by the selling securityholders for the sale of any of the securities. The selling securityholders may engage brokers and dealers, and any brokers or dealers may arrange for other brokers or dealers to participate in effecting sales of the securities. These brokers, dealers or underwriters may act as principals, or as an agent of a selling securityholder. Broker-dealers may agree with a selling securityholder to sell a specified number of the securities at a stipulated price per security. If the broker-dealer is unable to sell securities acting as agent for a selling securityholder, it may purchase as principal any unsold securities at the stipulated price. Broker-dealers who acquire securities as principals may thereafter resell the securities from time to time in transactions in any stock exchange or automated interdealer quotation system on which the securities are then listed, at prices and on terms then prevailing at the time of sale, at prices related to the then-current market price or in negotiated transactions. Broker-dealers may use block transactions and sales to and through broker-dealers, including transactions of the nature described above. The selling securityholders may also sell the securities in accordance with Rule 144 or Rule 144A under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, rather than pursuant to this prospectus, regardless of whether the securities are covered by this prospectus.

From time to time, one or more of the selling securityholders may pledge, hypothecate or grant a security interest in some or all of the securities owned by them. The pledgees, secured parties or persons to whom the securities have

150

been hypothecated will, upon foreclosure in the event of default, be deemed to be selling securityholders. The number of a selling securityholder’s securities offered under this prospectus will decrease as and when it takes such actions. The plan of distribution for that selling securityholder’s securities will otherwise remain unchanged. In addition, a selling securityholder may, from time to time, sell the securities short, and, in those instances, this prospectus may be delivered in connection with the short sales and the securities offered under this prospectus may be used to cover short sales.

To the extent required under the Securities Act of 1933, the aggregate amount of selling securityholders’ securities being offered and the terms of the offering, the names of any agents, brokers, dealers or underwriters and any applicable commission with respect to a particular offer will be set forth in an accompanying prospectus supplement. Any underwriters, dealers, brokers or agents participating in the distribution of the securities may receive compensation in the form of underwriting discounts, concessions, commissions or fees from a selling securityholder and/or purchasers of selling securityholders’ securities, for whom they may act (which compensation as to a particular broker-dealer might be in excess of customary commissions).

The selling securityholders and any underwriters, brokers, dealers or agents that participate in the distribution of the securities may be deemed to be “underwriters” within the meaning of the Securities Act of 1933, and any discounts, concessions, commissions or fees received by them and any profit on the resale of the securities sold by them may be deemed to be underwriting discounts and commissions.

A selling securityholder may enter into hedging transactions with broker-dealers and the broker-dealers may engage in short sales of the securities in the course of hedging the positions they assume with that selling securityholder, including, without limitation, in connection with distributions of the securities by those broker-dealers. A selling securityholder may enter into option or other transactions with broker-dealers that involve the delivery of the securities offered hereby to the broker-dealers, who may then resell or otherwise transfer those securities. A selling securityholder may also loan or pledge the securities offered hereby to a broker-dealer and the broker-dealer may sell the securities offered hereby so loaned or upon a default may sell or otherwise transfer the pledged securities offered hereby.

The selling securityholders and other persons participating in the sale or distribution of the securities will be subject to applicable provisions of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and the rules and regulations thereunder, including Regulation M. This regulation may limit the timing of purchases and sales of any of the securities by the selling securityholders and any other person. The anti-manipulation rules under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 may apply to sales of securities in the market and to the activities of the selling securityholders and their affiliates. Furthermore, Regulation M may restrict the ability of any person engaged in the distribution of the securities to engage in market-making activities with respect to the particular securities being distributed for a period of up to five business days before the distribution. These restrictions may affect the marketability of the securities and the ability of any person or entity to engage in market-making activities with respect to the securities.

We have agreed to indemnify in certain circumstances certain of the selling securityholders, including the holders of the Registrable Notes, and any brokers, dealers and agents who may be deemed to be underwriters, if any, of the securities covered by the registration statement, against certain liabilities, including liabilities under the Securities Act of 1933. Certain of the selling securityholders, including the holders of the Registrable Notes, have agreed to indemnify us in certain circumstances against certain liabilities, including liabilities under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.

The securities offered hereby were originally issued to the selling securityholders pursuant to an exemption from the registration requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. We have agreed to register the securities under the Securities Act of 1933, and, subject to the requirements of the securities laws or regulations, to keep the registration statement of which this prospectus is a part effective until the earlier of the third anniversary of the issuance date of the Registrable Notes and such time as there are no Registrable Notes outstanding. We have agreed to pay all expenses in connection with the resale of these shares, except for any underwriting discounts, concessions, commissions or fees of the selling securityholders or any fees and expenses of counsel or other advisors to the selling securityholders.

We will not receive any proceeds from sales of any securities by the selling securityholders.

We cannot assure you that the selling securityholders will sell all or any portion of the securities offered hereby.

151

DESCRIPTION OF NOTES

General

As used in this “Description of Notes” section, (i) the terms “we,” “our” and “us” each refer to Interactive Network, Inc. (“INI”), FriendFinder Networks Inc. (“FFN”) and their respective subsidiaries; and (ii) the term “Issuers” refers only to INI and FFN and not any of their subsidiaries.

On October 27, 2010, the Issuers co-issued $305.0 million principal amount of Senior Secured Notes, $13.8 million of Cash Pay Notes and $232.5 million of Non-Cash Pay Notes.

The filing of the shelf registration statement is being made to satisfy the Issuers’ obligations under the registration rights provisions of the Indentures.

The Registrable Notes

The following is a summary of the material provisions of the Indentures and the Registrable Notes and does not purport to be complete. We urge you to read the Indentures because they, not this description, define your rights as holders of the Registrable Notes and describe the terms of the Registrable Notes in more detail. The Indentures are incorporated by reference into the Registration Statement of which this prospectus forms a part.

The Senior Secured Notes, the Cash Pay Notes and the Non-Cash Pay Notes are three separate series of Registrable Notes, including for purposes of, among other things, payments of principal and interest, Events of Default and consents to amendments to the applicable Indentures and the applicable Registrable Notes.

Senior Secured Notes

The Senior Secured Notes were issued with an original issue discount of $6.1 million or 2.0%. The Senior Secured Notes mature on September 30, 2013 and accrue interest at a rate per annum equal to 14.0%, subject to a default premium of 3.5% per annum. Interest on the Senior Secured Notes is payable quarterly on March 31, June 30, September 30 and December 31 of each year. Principal on the Senior Secured Notes is payable quarterly to the extent of 75% of Excess Cash Flow at 102% of principal (“Cash Flow Sweep”), subject to pro-rata sharing with the Cash Pay Notes. The Senior Secured Notes are guaranteed by all of the Issuers’ existing and future domestic subsidiaries and are collateralized by a first-priority lien on all of the assets of FFN and its direct and indirect domestic subsidiaries, including without limitation receivables, inventory, furniture, fixtures, equipment, trademarks, copyrights and other intangibles, real property and capital stock of subsidiaries, including a pledge of substantially all of the stock owned by the Issuers. The guarantees are the senior secured obligations of each such subsidiary guarantor. The Senior Secured Notes are senior in right of payment to the Non-Cash Pay Notes and any future subordinated indebtedness and pari passu with the Cash Pay Notes with respect to interest and certain mandatory prepayments. The Senior Secured Notes are redeemable prior to maturity at the Issuers’ option in whole but not in part, at 110% of principal, plus accrued and unpaid interest. As a result of the initial public offering of FFN’s common stock, or IPO, the net proceeds from the IPO were used to redeem $37,832,000 of principal plus $721,000 of unpaid accrued interest under the Senior Secured Notes, resulting in a remaining principal balance of $243,785,000. Noteholders have the option of requiring the Issuers to repurchase the Senior Secured Notes in full upon a Change of Control, at 110% of principal, plus accrued and unpaid interest to the purchase date. The Issuers shall also repay or offer to pay the Senior Secured Notes and, in certain circumstances, the Cash Pay Notes, with proceeds received from any debt or equity financing and asset sales of $25 million or more at 110% of principal, plus accrued and unpaid interest, other asset sales, insurance claims, condemnation, litigation settlement and other extraordinary cash receipts in excess of $1 million at principal, plus accrued and unpaid interest, subject to certain exceptions.

The Senior Secured Notes held by Andrew Conru, Lars Mapstead or their respective affiliates (the “Conru/Mapstead Notes”) have identical terms to all other Senior Secured Notes except that, with respect to voting, there are significant limitations on the Conru/Mapstead Notes. The Cash Pay Notes will vote on a dollar for dollar basis with the Senior Secured Notes, which are not Conru/Mapstead Notes, on all matters put to a vote except for matters relating to collateral, liens and enforcement of rights and remedies. Upon the sale of Conru/Mapstead Notes to a

152

person who is not an affiliate of INI, FFN or any initial Conru/Mapstead Notes holder or family member such Conru/Mapstead Notes shall no longer be subject to the aforesaid limitations.

Cash Pay Notes

The Cash Pay Notes, were issued with an original issue discount of $276,000 or 2%. The Cash Pay Notes are identical to the terms of the Senior Secured Notes, exclusive of the Conru/Mapstead Notes, except as to matters regarding collateral, subordination, enforcement and voting, with regards to which they will be contractually subordinated to the Senior Secured Notes. The Cash Pay Notes are secured by a fully subordinated second lien on substantially all of our assets, parri passu with the Non-Cash Pay Notes, and will be included with the Senior Secured Notes on a dollar for dollar basis for the purposes of determining required consents and waivers on all matters except for matters relating to collateral, liens and enforcement of rights and remedies. As to such matters, the Cash-Pay Notes will be included with the Non-Cash Pay Notes for the purposes of determining required consents and waivers.

As a result of the initial public offering of FFN’s common stock, or IPO, the net proceeds from the IPO were used to redeem $1,709,000 of principal plus $33,000 of unpaid accrued interest under the Cash Pay Notes, resulting in a remaining principal balance of $11,012,000.

The Issuers shall also, in certain circumstances and subject to prior full repayment of the Senior Secured Notes, repay or offer to pay the Senior Secured Notes (if not previously repaid) and the Cash Pay Notes, with proceeds received from any debt or equity financing and asset sales of $25 million or more at 110% of principal, plus accrued and unpaid interest, other asset sales, insurance claims, condemnation and other extraordinary cash receipts in excess of $1 million at principal, plus accrued and unpaid interest, subject to certain exceptions.

The Cash Pay Notes will be considered a single class with the Non-Cash Pay Notes in a bankruptcy. If the Cash Pay Notes are considered to be a separate class in a bankruptcy, the holders thereof will agree to vote as directed by the majority of the Senior Secured Note holders, in the manner provided in the intercreditor agreement between the holders of the Senior Secured Notes, the holders of the Cash Pay Notes and the holders of the Non-Cash Pay Notes, dated as of October 27, 2010 (the “Senior Intercreditor Agreement”).

Non-Cash Pay Notes

The Non-Cash Pay Notes mature on April 30, 2014 and, subject to a default premium of 3.5%, bear interest at 11.5% per annum, payable semi-annually on June 30 and December 31 of each year. While the Senior Secured Notes are in place, interest must be paid in kind with additional Non-Cash Pay Notes and after the Senior Secured Notes have been repaid in full, the Issuers may pay interest in cash or with additional Non-Cash Pay Notes. The Non-Cash Pay Notes are fully subordinate in all respects to the Senior Secured Notes (including, without limitation, in right of payment, security, exercise of remedies and turnover), but rank equal in priority as to security with the Cash Pay Notes. The Non-Cash Pay Notes are guaranteed by our domestic subsidiaries and collateralized by a second priority lien on all of their assets and a pledge of the domestic subsidiaries’ stock; however, such security interest is subordinate to the prior payment of the Senior Secured Notes. The guarantees are the senior secured obligations of each such subsidiary guarantor subordinate only to the first-priority lien granted to the holders of the Senior Secured Notes. The Non-Cash Pay Notes are redeemable, at the Issuers’ option in whole but not in part, at 100% of principal, plus accrued and unpaid interest, subject to the rights of the holders of the Senior Secured Notes under the Senior Intercreditor Agreement, which provides that no redemption of the Non-Cash Pay Notes may occur until the Senior Secured Notes are repaid in full.

Upon the payment in full of the Senior Secured Notes, principal on the Non-Cash Pay Notes is payable quarterly to the extent of 75% of Excess Cash Flow at 102% of principal subject to pro-rata sharing with the Cash Pay Notes. Noteholders have the option of requiring the Issuers to repurchase the Non-Cash Pay Notes in full upon a Change of Control occurring after the Senior Secured Notes are paid in full at 110% of principal, plus accrued and unpaid interest. If the Senior Secured Notes are paid in full, the Issuers shall repay the remaining Non-Cash Pay Notes and the Cash Pay Notes on a pro-rata basis with proceeds received from any debt or equity financing and asset sales of over $25 million at 110% of principal, plus accrued and unpaid interest, and other asset sales, insurance claims, condemnation and other extraordinary cash receipts in excess of $1 million at principal, subject to certain exceptions.

153

As a result of the IPO, the Non-Cash Pay Notes became convertible into shares of FFN’s common stock, solely at the option of the holders. Conversion rights commenced upon the consummation of the IPO and expire at the close of business on the date prior to the date the Non-Cash Pay Notes are paid in full. The conversion price of the Non-Cash Pay Notes was set at $10.00 per share (based on the offering price for shares of FFN’s common stock upon consummation of the IPO) provided that such conversion option is limited to approximately 21.1% of FFN’s fully diluted equity as of the close of business on the date our IPO was consummated (the “Conversion Limit”). The Non-Cash Pay Notes, or any portion of the principal amount thereof which is $1,000 or an integral multiple of $1.00 may be converted at the principal amount thereof, or of such portion thereof, into fully paid and nonassessable shares (calculated as to each conversion to the nearest 1/100 of a share) of FFN voting common stock, at the conversion price determined as in effect at the time of conversion. The Non-Cash Pay Notes have been recorded at estimated fair value at the date of issuance on the Issuers’ December 31, 2010 balance sheet.

In order to exercise the conversion right with respect to any certificated Non-Cash Pay Note, the holder shall surrender such Note, duly endorsed or assigned to FFN or in blank, at any office or agency of FFN maintained for that purpose, accompanied by written notice in the form attached to the certificated Note to FFN at such office or agency that the holder elects to convert such Note. In order to exercise the conversion right with respect to any other Non-Cash Pay Notes, the holder must complete the appropriate instruction form for conversion pursuant to the applicable book-entry conversion program, furnish appropriate endorsements and transfer documents if required by FFN or the Trustee or conversion agent, and pay the funds and any transfer taxes if required pursuant to the applicable Indenture terms. So long as the requested conversion does not violate the Conversion Limit, and except as qualified if the amount of Non-Cash Pay Notes which a holder desires to convert in such exercise of conversion exceeds 50% of the then applicable Conversion Limit which has not been utilized, Non-Cash Pay Notes shall be deemed to have been converted immediately prior to the close of business on the day of surrender of such Notes for conversion in accordance with the foregoing provisions, and at such time the rights of such Persons as the holders of such Notes shall cease, and the Persons entitled to receive the FFN voting common stock issuable upon conversion shall be treated for all purposes as the record holders of such FFN voting common stock at such time. If the amount of Non-Cash Pay Notes which a holder desires to convert exceeds 50% of the then applicable Conversion Limit which has not been utilized, the Trustee will give notice to the holders of the Non-Cash Pay Notes that a holder desires to convert notes exceeding 50% of the then applicable Conversion Limit and that each such holder may elect to participate on a pro rata basis in such a conversion by submitting an election to participate. The conversion price shall be subject to adjustment in the event FFN shall (1) effect a subdivision of the outstanding shares of FFN voting common stock into a greater number of shares, (2) effect a combination of the outstanding shares of FFN voting common stock into a smaller number of shares, or (3) issue to the holders of its FFN voting common stock a dividend or distribution payable in, or otherwise issue a dividend or other distribution on any class of its capital stock payable in, shares of FFN voting common stock.

Set forth below are certain defined terms used in the Indentures. Reference is made to the Indentures for a full disclosure of all such terms, as well as any other capitalized terms used herein for which no definition is provided.

“Broadstream Matter” means a dispute between Broadstream Capital Partners, Inc., on the one hand, and FFN, or any other Obligor, on the other hand, relating to, arising from or otherwise in connection with the acquisition of Various, Inc. or the business of INI by FFN.

“Change of Control” means the occurrence of any of the following:

(a) the sale, lease, transfer, conveyance or other disposition (other than by way of merger or consolidation), in one or a series of related transactions, of all or substantially all of the properties or assets of FFN and its Subsidiaries taken as a whole to any Person (including any “person” (as that term is used in Section 13(d)(3) of the Exchange Act)) other than the Permitted Holders or an entity in which the Permitted Holders are the Beneficial Owners, directly or indirectly, of more than 50% of the Voting Stock of FFN, measured by voting power rather than number of shares;

(b) the adoption of a plan relating to the liquidation or dissolution of any Issuer;

(c) the consummation of any transaction (including, without limitation, any merger or consolidation), the result of which is that any Person (including any “person” (as defined above)) other than the Permitted Holders

154

becomes the Beneficial Owner, directly or indirectly, of more than 50% of the Voting Stock of any Issuer, measured by voting power rather than number of shares;

(d) the first day on which a majority of the members of the Board of Directors of any Issuer are not Continuing Directors;

(e) the first day on which, except as permitted by the applicable indenture, the Issuers shall cease to have beneficial ownership (as defined in Rule 13d-3 under the Exchange Act) of at least the same percentage of the aggregate Voting Stock of each Guarantor that the Issuers, respectively, had as of the Issue Date, free and clear of all Liens (other than any Liens granted under the Indentures and Permitted Liens); or

(f) the first day that the Permitted Holders shall fail to hold at least 10,000,000 shares of the Voting Stock of FFN, such number to be appropriately adjusted for any stock dividend, stock split, stock combination or other similar transaction as reasonably determined by the Required Holders); provided, however, this clause (f) was no longer applicable upon consummation of a Qualified Initial Public Offering so long as the First Lien Debt Ratio of FFN and its Subsidiaries is equal to or less than 2.25:1.0 for the immediately prior four Fiscal Quarters.

“Consolidated EBITDA” means, with respect to any period, Consolidated Net Income for such period increased (without duplication), to the extent deducted in calculating such Consolidated Net Income, by (a) Consolidated Income Tax Expense for such period; (b) Consolidated Interest Expense for such period without regard to any related proviso relating to reduction of Consolidated Interest Expense for Subsidiaries that are not Wholly Owned Subsidiaries of any Issuer; (c) depreciation, amortization and any other non-cash items for such period; (d) any amount accrued by FFN in its financial statements as a reserve in connection with the Broadstream Matter during such period; (e) costs and expenses incurred by FFN or accrued by FFN in its financial statements during such period in connection with a Qualified Initial Public Offering; (f) reasonable and customary out of pocket costs and expenses incurred by FFN or accrued by FFN (other than in favor of Affiliates) in its financial statements during such period in connection with the redemption of the FFN and INI prior debt refinanced with the Old Notes; and (g) all cash and non-cash VAT Liability items deducted in determining Consolidated Net Income for such period that relate to activities of Various, Inc. or its Subsidiaries prior to July 1, 2008, less any non-cash items to the extent they increase Consolidated Net Income (including the partial or entire reversal of reserves taken in prior periods) for such period, of each Issuer and their respective Subsidiaries, including without limitation, amortization of capitalized debt issuance costs for such period, all of the foregoing determined on a consolidated basis for each Issuer and their respective Subsidiaries in accordance with GAAP; provided that, if any Subsidiary is not a Wholly Owned Subsidiary of any Issuer, Consolidated EBITDA shall be reduced (to the extent not otherwise reduced in accordance with GAAP) by an amount equal to (A) the amount of Consolidated EBITDA attributable to such Subsidiary multiplied by (B) the percentage ownership interest in such Subsidiary not owned on the last day of such period by any Issuer or any of their respective Subsidiaries.

“Consolidated Coverage Ratio” means, with respect to the Issuers and the other Obligors, on any Determination Date, the ratio of:

(a) Consolidated EBITDA for the applicable Measurement Period, to

(b) Annualized Consolidated Interest Expense;

provided that the Consolidated Coverage Ratio shall be calculated giving pro forma effect, as of the beginning of the Measurement Period or three calendar month period, as applicable, to any acquisition, incurrence, permanent repayment or redemption of Indebtedness (including the Securities), issuance or redemption of Disqualified Stock, acquisition, Asset Sale, or purchases of assets that were previously leased, at any time during or subsequent to such Measurement Period or three calendar month period, as applicable, but on or prior to the applicable Determination Date.

For purposes of calculating Consolidated EBITDA of the Issuers and the other Obligors for the applicable Measurement Period,

(a)

any Person that is a Subsidiary on such Determination Date (or would become a Subsidiary on such Determination Date in connection with the transaction that requires the determination of the Consolidated Coverage Ratio) shall be deemed to have been a Subsidiary at all times during such Measurement Period,

155

(b)

any Person that is not a Subsidiary on such Determination Date (or would cease to be a Subsidiary on such Determination Date in connection with the transaction that requires the determination of the Consolidated Coverage Ratio) will be deemed not to have been a Subsidiary at any time during such Measurement Period,

(c)

if any Obligor shall have in any manner (i) acquired (including through an asset acquisition or the commencement of activities constituting such operating business), or (ii) disposed of (including by way of an Asset Sale or the termination or discontinuance of activities constituting such operating business) any operating business during such Measurement Period or after the end of such Measurement Period and on or prior to the Determination Date, such calculation shall be made on a pro forma basis in accordance with GAAP as if, in the case of an asset acquisition or the commencement of activities constituting such operating business, all such transactions had been consummated on the first day of such Measurement Period and, in the case of an Asset Sale or termination or discontinuance of activities constituting such operating business, all such transactions had been consummated prior to the first day of such Measurement Period; provided, however, that such pro forma adjustment shall not give effect to the Consolidated EBITDA of any acquired Person to the extent that such Person’s net income would be excluded pursuant to clauses (a) through (g) of the definition of Consolidated Net Income; and

(d)

any Indebtedness incurred and proceeds thereof received and applied as a result of the transaction giving rise to the need to calculate the Consolidated Coverage Ratio will be deemed to have been so incurred, received and applied on the first day of such Measurement Period.

“Consolidated Interest Expense” means for any period the consolidated interest expense included in the consolidated income statement of FFN and its Subsidiaries for such period calculated on a consolidated basis in accordance with GAAP, including without limitation or duplication (or, to the extent not so included, with the addition of), (i) the amortization of debt discounts; (ii) any payments or fees with respect to letters of credit, bankers’ acceptances or similar facilities; (iii) fees (net of any amounts received) with respect to any Hedging Agreement; (iv) interest on Indebtedness guaranteed by FFN and its Subsidiaries, to the extent paid by any Issuer or any such Subsidiary; and (v) the portion of any Capitalized Lease Obligation allocable to interest expense; provided, that, if any Subsidiary is not a Wholly Owned Subsidiary of FFN, Consolidated Interest Expense shall be reduced (to the extent not otherwise reduced in accordance with GAAP) by an amount equal to (A) the amount of Consolidated Interest Expense attributable to such Subsidiary multiplied by (B) the percentage ownership interest in such Subsidiary not owned on the last day of such period by FFN or its Subsidiaries.

“Consolidated Net Income” for any period means the consolidated net income (or loss) of FFN and its Subsidiaries for such period determined on a consolidated basis in accordance with GAAP; provided that there shall be excluded therefrom:

(a)

the net income (or loss) of any Person that is not a Subsidiary of FFN except to the extent of the amount of dividends or other distributions actually paid to FFN or such Subsidiary by such Person during such period,

(b)

gains or losses on Asset Sales by FFN or its Subsidiaries,

(c)

all extraordinary gains and extraordinary losses, including such gains and losses derived from Extraordinary Receipts,

(d)

the cumulative effect of changes in accounting principles,

(e)

any net income of any Subsidiary if such Subsidiary is subject to restrictions, directly or indirectly, by contract, operation of law, pursuant to its charter or otherwise on the payment of dividends or the making of distributions by such Subsidiary to such Person except that:

(i)

such Person’s equity in the net income of any such Subsidiary for such period shall be included in such Consolidated Net Income up to the aggregate amount of cash that could have been paid or distributed during such period to such Person as a dividend or other distribution (provided that such ability is not due to a waiver of such restriction), and

156

(ii)

such Person’s equity in a net loss of any such Subsidiary for such period shall be included in determining such Consolidated Net Income regardless of any such restriction,

(f)

in the case of a successor to such Person by consolidation or merger or as a transferee of such Person’s assets, any net income or loss of the successor corporation prior to such consolidation, merger or transfer of assets; and

(g)

the tax effect of any of the items described in clauses (a) through (f) above.

“Continuing Directors” means, as of any date of determination, any member of the board of directors of FFN or INI, as applicable, who: (1) was a member of such Board of Directors on the date of the applicable Indenture; or (2) was nominated for election or elected to such Board of Directors with the approval of one or more Permitted Holders or a majority of the Continuing Directors who were members of such Board of Directors at the time of such nomination or election.

“Excess Cash Flow” means, with respect to any Person for any period, (a) the sum of (i) Consolidated EBITDA of such Person and its Subsidiaries for such period plus (ii) the cash portion of Operating Lease Obligations made by such Person and its Subsidiaries during such period to the extent permitted to be made under the Indentures in excess of $3,000,000 during any fiscal year of FFN, less (b) the sum of (i) all Consolidated Interest Expense to the extent paid or payable in cash during such period, (ii) the cash portion of Capital Expenditures made by such Person and its Subsidiaries during such period up to $5,000,000 during any fiscal year provided that the portion of such Capital Expenditures constituting Capitalized Lease Obligations shall not exceed the amount set forth in the applicable financial covenant of the Indentures, and (iii) to the extent deducted in calculating Consolidated Net Income and added in the calculation of Consolidated EBITDA, income taxes paid in cash by such Person and its Subsidiaries for such period.

“Exchange Act” means the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

“Guarantors” means each Subsidiary of FFN (other than INI) party to the Indentures, and also include any persons becoming guarantors after the date of the Indentures.

“Permitted Acquisition” means any acquisition satisfying each of the following conditions:

(a)

the aggregate amounts payable in connection with, and other consideration for (in each case, including all transaction costs and all Indebtedness, liabilities and Contingent Obligations incurred or assumed in connection therewith or otherwise reflected in a consolidated balance sheet of any Obligor and the proposed acquisition target and including any “earnout” or similar payment obligations), any acquisition, whether in one transaction or a series of related transactions, shall not exceed $20,000,000;

(b)

if such acquisition is of Capital Stock in any Person, the acquisition shall be of 100% of the Capital Stock of such Person;

(c)

the Holders (including Holders of Conru/Mapstead Definitive Securities) shall have received (i) reasonable advance notice of such acquisition including a reasonably detailed description thereof at least 15 days prior to the consummation of such acquisition, (ii) substantially final drafts of the acquisition agreement and related documents at least 5 Business Days prior to the consummation of such acquisition and (iii) on or prior to the date of such acquisition, copies of the final acquisition agreement and related documents certified by an Authorized Officer as being true, correct and complete copies thereof and any other information reasonably requested by the Required Holders; provided, however, no Obligor shall be required to comply with this clause (c) upon the consummation of a Qualified Initial Public Offering or if the value of the acquisition, whether in one transaction or a series of related transactions, and calculated in accordance with clause (a) above does not exceed $500,000; and

(d)

as of the date of consummation of such acquisition and after giving effect to all transactions to occur on such date as part of such acquisition, (i) the representations and warranties set forth in each Note Document shall be true and correct in all material respects on and as of such date or, to the extent such representations and warranties expressly relate to an earlier date, on and as of such earlier date and (ii) no Default or Event of Default shall be continuing.

157

“Permitted Holders” means (a) Marc H. Bell and his Affiliates and, upon his death, his spouse, lineal descendants and any trust or entity owned, controlled by or established for the benefit of, or the estate of, any of the foregoing (including trustees, officers, directors, managers or members of any such trust or entity) and (b) Daniel Staton and his Affiliates and, upon his death, his spouse, lineal descendants and any trust or entity owned, controlled by or established for the benefit of, or the estate of, any of the foregoing (including trustees, officers, directors, managers or members of any such trust or entity).

“Person” means an individual, corporation, limited liability company, partnership, association, joint-stock company, trust, unincorporated organization, joint venture or other enterprise or entity or Governmental Authority.

Senior Intercreditor Agreement

The Senior Intercreditor Agreement provides for (i) for the full subordination of the Non-Cash Pay Notes to the Senior Secured Notes in priority of payment, priority of liens and enforcement, including, without limitation, a complete standstill in exercise of remedies by the holders of the Non-Cash Pay Notes until all obligations in respect of the Senior Secured Notes have been satisfied in full and (ii) the full subordination of the Cash Pay Notes to the Senior Secured Notes in priority of liens and enforcement (but not payment, unless the funds result from an enforcement action against the collateral), including, without limitation, a complete standstill in exercise of remedies by the holders of the Cash Pay Notes until all obligations in respect of the Senior Secured Notes have been satisfied in full.

The Non-Cash Pay Notes and the documents entered into in connection therewith shall not be amended without the prior written consent of a majority of the holders of the Senior Secured Notes, exclusive of the Conru/Mapstead Notes.

The Senior Secured Notes and the documents entered into in connection therewith may be amended without the consent of the holders of the Non-Cash Pay Notes; provided, however, (a) if the Conru/Mapstead Notes are no longer outstanding, Andrew Conru, in his capacity as a holder of the Non-Cash Pay Notes, shall have the right to consent to any change to the Senior Secured Notes Cash Flow Sweep provision that would reduce the Cash Flow
Sweep until such date that he and his affiliates hold at any one time less than $50.0 million of the principal amount of the Non-Cash Pay Notes and (b) any refinancing of the Senior Secured Notes described below shall be subject to the terms set forth in those notes.

The Non-Cash Pay Notes may not be refinanced without the consent of the holders of the Senior Secured Notes. The prior written consent of the majority holders of the Non-Cash Pay Notes shall be required to refinance the Senior Secured Notes if (i) the maturity date of such refinancing debt extends beyond the maturity date of the Non-Cash Pay Notes or any refinancing of those notes or (ii) the aggregate principal amount of the refinancing indebtedness exceeds the sum of (a) the aggregate principal amount of the Senior Secured Notes then outstanding plus an additional 10% of that principal amount to pay prepayment premium, (b) unpaid and accrued interest and (c) reasonable and customary fees and expenses incurred in connection with the refinancing, including, without limitation, fees and expenses of counsel, investment banks and other advisors; provided that so long as Andrew Conru, Lars Mapstead or their respective affiliates hold at least a majority of the outstanding principal amount of the Non-Cash Pay Notes following the refinancing, any fees (excluding optional pre-payment premiums) payable to the holders refinancing the Senior Secured Notes shall only be paid if commensurate fees are payable to the holders refinancing the Non-Cash Pay Notes in a refinancing that is concurrent with the Senior Secured Notes refinancing. For the avoidance of doubt, the immediately preceding proviso shall not apply to any underwriting fees or any other fees that are not generally payable to the holders of the refinancing debt as a class. The sole remedy of the holders of the Non-Cash Pay Notes due to any such refinancing debt exceeding the permitted amount set forth above shall be that such excess debt shall be subordinate in priority to the Non-Cash Pay Notes.

The Cash Pay Notes will vote with the Senior Secured Notes, exclusive of the Conru/Mapstead Notes, on a dollar for dollar basis on all matters put to a vote to the holders of the Senior Secured Notes except for matters relating to collateral, liens and enforcement of rights and remedies. The Cash Pay Notes will vote with the Non-Cash Pay Notes on a dollar for dollar basis on all matters put to a vote to the holders of the Non-Cash Pay Notes relating to collateral, liens and enforcement of rights and remedies. If the Cash Pay Notes are considered to be a separate class in a bankruptcy, the holders of those notes will agree to vote as directed by the majority of the Senior Secured Note holders, in the manner provided in the Senior Intercreditor Agreement.

158

Second Lien Intercreditor Agreement

Pursuant to the terms of the intercreditor agreement between the holders of the Cash Pay Notes and the holders of the Non-Cash Pay Notes dated as of October 27, 2010, the holders of the Cash Pay Notes agreed to subordinate their right to take enforcement action against the collateral under their security and collateral agreements until the prior payment in full of the Non-Cash Pay Notes. Until the Non-Cash Pay Notes are paid in full, the liens on collateral securing the Cash Pay Notes and the Non-Cash Pay Notes are equal in priority and the security and collateral documents for the Non-Cash Pay Notes additionally secure the Cash Pay Notes, with all proceeds of collateral enforcement actions relating to the Non-Cash Pay Notes to be distributed on a pari passu basis to the holders of the Cash Pay Notes and the holders of the Non-Cash Pay Notes in accordance with their pro rata share at that time.

Financial and Other Covenants

The New Notes are subject to affirmative, negative and financial covenants relating to limitations and requirements applicable to us, including without limitation:

•

Minimum EBITDA. We shall not permit our Consolidated EBITDA to be less than the amount specified for the applicable period below:

Period	Minimum Consolidated EBITDA
Four Fiscal Quarters Ending:
December 31, 2010	$	85,000,000
March 31, 2011	$	85,000,000
June 30, 2011	$	85,000,000
September 30, 2011	$	85,000,000

Period	Minimum Consolidated EBITDA
December 31, 2011	$	90,000,000
March 31, 2012	$	90,000,000
June 30, 2012	$	90,000,000
September 30, 2012	$	90,000,000
December 31, 2012	$	95,000,000
March 31, 2013	$	95,000,000
June 30, 2013	$	95,000,000
September 30, 2013	$	95,000,000

•

Minimum Liquidity. Our unrestricted cash that is on deposit in accounts that are subject to account control agreements in favor of the Trustee shall not be less than $10,000,000 at any time.

•

Maximum Senior Leverage. Our ratio of outstanding principal under the Senior Secured Notes to Consolidated EBITDA shall not be greater than the amount specified for the applicable period below:

Four Fiscal Quarters Ending:				Senior Leverage Ratio
December 31, 2010					3.5:1.0
March 31, 2011					3.5:1.0
June 30, 2011					3.3:1.0
September 30, 2011					3.3:1.0
December 31, 2011					3.0:1.0
March 31, 2012					3.0:1.0
June 30, 2012					2.8:1.0
September 30, 2012					2.8:1.0

159

Four Fiscal Quarters Ending:				Senior Leverage Ratio
December 31, 2012					2.5:1.0
March 31, 2013					2.5:1.0
June 30, 2013					2.2:1.0
September 30, 2013					2.2:1.0

•

Maximum Total Leverage. Our ratio of total indebtedness to Consolidated EBITDA shall not be greater than the amount specified for the applicable period below:

Four Fiscal Quarters Ending:				Total Leverage Ratio
December 31, 2010					6.5:1.0
March 31, 2011					6.5:1.0
June 30, 2011					6.5:1.0
September 30, 2011					6.5:1.0
December 31, 2011					6.1:1.0
March 31, 2012					6.1:1.0
June 30, 2012					6.1:1.0
September 30, 2012					6.1:1.0
December 31, 2012					5.7:1.0
March 31, 2013					5.7:1.0
June 30, 2013					5.7:1.0
September 30, 2013					5.7:1.0

•

Minimum Coverage Ratio. We shall not permit our ratio of Consolidated EBITDA to Annualized Consolidated Interest Expense to be less than the amount specified for the applicable period below:

Period				Consolidated Coverage Ratio
Four Fiscal Quarters Ending:
December 31, 2010					1.9:1.0
March 31, 2011					1.9:1.0
June 30, 2011					2.0:1.0
September 30, 2011					2.0:1.0
December 31, 2011					2.2:1.0
March 31, 2012					2.2:1.0
June 30, 2012					2.3:1.0
September 30, 2012					2.3:1.0
December 31, 2012					2.7:1.0
March 31, 2013					2.7:1.0
June 30, 2013					2.9:1.0
September 30, 2013					2.9:1.0

•

Maximum Operating Lease Obligations. Our operating lease obligations shall not, in the aggregate, exceed $4,000,000 annually.

•

Maximum Capitalized Lease Obligations. We shall not incur new capitalized lease obligations that, in the aggregate, exceed $800,000 annually; provided, however the amortization of the capitalized lease obligations shall count against the $4,000,000 basket for operating lease obligations.

•

Limitations on Loans, Advances, Capital Expenditures and Investments. None of us shall make any loan, advance, guarantee, other extension of credit, capital contribution or investment, except for certain specified exceptions, including, without limitation, (1) listed existing investments, (2) loans and advances

160

in the ordinary course of business by any Issuer to any wholly owned subsidiary and by any such subsidiary to any Issuer, (3) any acquisition not exceeding $20,000,000 and otherwise satisfying specified conditions, and (4) specified permitted investments, including, without limitation, investment in any Issuer or a wholly owned subsidiary of any Issuer, aggregate investments in any Person not exceeding $1,000,000 and investments in foreign subsidiaries up to $100,000 in the aggregate.

•

Limitations on Indebtedness and Liens. None of us shall create, assume, guarantee or allow to exist any lien or indebtedness, except for Permitted Liens and Permitted Indebtedness, including, without limitation, listed existing indebtedness and liens, hedging agreements for up to $5,000,000, liens imposed by law in the ordinary course of business and purchase money liens.

•

Limitations on Dividends and other Restricted Payments. None of us shall make any of various specified restricted payments, including, without limitation, dividends or other distributions, redemptions or sinking fund payments, compensation to any affiliate or employee, and payments or prepayments on subordinated debt, all subject to certain described exceptions, including, without limitation, in-kind interest payments on the Non-Cash Pay Notes and certain specified payments on the Cash Pay Notes.

•

Limitations on Transactions with Affiliates. None of us shall enter into any transaction with or for the benefit of any affiliate, except for certain specified transactions, including, without limitation, those in the ordinary course of business in a manner and to an extent consistent with past practice and necessary or desirable for the prudent operation of our business, for fair consideration and on terms no less favorable than would be obtainable in a comparable arm’s length transaction with a non-affiliated Person.

•

Limitations on Sale-Leaseback Transactions. None of us shall incur any obligations as lessee in connection with any sale and leaseback transaction.

•

Limitations on Consolidations, Mergers, Acquisitions and Dispositions of Assets. None of us shall liquidate or dissolve, or merge or consolidate with any Person, or conduct any sale with respect to our business, property or assets, or purchase or otherwise acquire the assets of any Person, except for (1) assets acquired in the ordinary course of business, (2) mergers and consolidations between FFN and its wholly owned subsidiaries satisfying certain conditions, (3) specified permitted acquisitions, (4) dispositions of obsolete or worn-out equipment in the ordinary course of business, and (5) liquidation or dissolution of any subsidiary that has no material assets or liabilities.

•

Reporting requirements. The Issuers are required to file with the Securities and Exchange Commission or make publicly available all information required under Rule 144(c) of the Securities Act of 1933 and comply with Section 314 of the Trust Indenture Act of 1939. In addition, we are required to provide the Trustee and the holders of the New Notes with (1) periodic compliance certificates, (2) notice of any change of name, structure or jurisdiction of organization for any of us, (3) notice of default, material adverse change or material action, suit or proceeding, (4) copies of all information which any of us provides to holders of its debt or securities or to any securities exchange, and (5) notice of any material development with respect to value added tax liability.

Events of Default.

The Events of Default include, without limitation (1) failure to timely make any of the payments required in connection with the Registrable Notes or related documents when due or within 10 calendar days of the due date, (2) any representations or warranties made in connection with the Registrable Notes or related documents were incorrect in any material respect when made or deemed made, (3) failure, in any material respect, to comply with the terms of the Indentures or other documents related to the Registrable Notes, (4) default under other indebtedness in excess of $500,000, (5) the institution of bankruptcy, insolvency, liquidation or dissolution proceedings or proceedings seeking the appointment of a receiver or other similar official, (6) any lien securing the Registrable Notes is contested or ceases to be valid, (7) entry of a final judgment exceeding $1,000,000, and (8) occurrence of an event or development which could reasonably be expected to have a material adverse effect.

Amendments

The Trustee and we may agree to certain specified amendments or supplements to the Registrable Notes, the Indentures and related documents without notice to or consent of any holder of the New Notes including to cure

161

any ambiguity, omission, defect or inconsistency, to add guarantees or release a guarantor in accordance with the Indentures, to pledge or grant a security interest as additional security, to add to the covenants for the benefit of the holders, to make any change that does not adversely affect the legal rights of any holder and to add additional events of default. However, except with respect to other specified amendments or waivers requiring particular additional consents, no other amendment or waiver of any provision of the Indentures, the Registrable Notes and the related documents, and no consent to any departure from those provisions, shall be effective unless the same shall be in writing and signed by (a) the Issuers, (b) the “Required Holders” as specified in the applicable Indenture or by the Trustee with the consent of the Required Holders and (c) as applicable, the Guarantors.

Trustee

If an Event of Default has occurred and is continuing, the Trustee shall exercise the rights and powers vested in it by the Indentures; provided that the Trustee and the collateral agent will be under no obligation to exercise any of the rights or powers under the Indentures, the Registrable Notes or the related documents or at the request or direction of any holders of the Registrable Notes unless such holders have offered the Trustee or the collateral agent indemnity or security reasonably satisfactory to each of them in their sole discretion against loss, liability or expense. The Issuers shall pay to the Trustee from time to time reasonable compensation for its services under the Indentures and under the Registrable Notes and related documents as the Issuers and the Trustee shall from time to time agree to in writing. The Issuers shall reimburse the Trustee upon request for all reasonable out-of-pocket expenses incurred or made by it. The Issuers shall indemnify the Trustee against any and all loss, liability, damages, claims or expense incurred by it without willful misconduct, negligence or bad faith on its part in connection with the administration of its trust and the performance of its duties under the Indentures and under the Registrable Notes and related documents.

Book-Entry Form

The book-entry provisions apply only to uncertificated Registrable Notes deposited with the Trustee, as custodian for The Depository Trust Company (“DTC”). Subject to certain specified exceptions, each of the uncertificated Registrable Notes initially shall (x) be registered in the name of DTC or the nominee of DTC, (y) be delivered to the Trustee as custodian for DTC and (z) bear certain required legends. Except as specified in certain exceptions, transfers of those Registrable Notes (but not a beneficial interest in those notes) will be limited to transfers of those notes in whole, but not in part, to the depositary. Any holder of an uncertificated Registrable Note shall, by acceptance of such note, agree that transfers of beneficial interests in such note may be effected only through a book-entry system maintained by (a) the holder of such note (or its agent) or (b) any holder of a beneficial interest in such note, and that ownership of a beneficial interest in such note shall be required to be reflected in a book entry.

162

DESCRIPTION OF CAPITAL STOCK

General

The following is a summary of the rights of our common stock, preferred stock, warrants and related provisions of our articles of incorporation and our bylaws. For more detailed information see our articles of incorporation and our bylaws, copies of which are listed as Exhibit 3.4 and 3.5 to this registration statement, respectively.

Our authorized capital stock consists of 125,000,000 shares of common stock, $0.001 par value per share, 12,500,000 of which are designated Series B common stock, and 22,500,000 shares of preferred stock, $0.001 par value per share, 2,500,000 shares of which are designated Series A Convertible Preferred Stock and 10,000,000 shares of which are designated Series B Convertible Preferred Stock.

Common Stock

Common Stock

As of December 14 , 2011, there were 31,219,644 shares of our common stock issued and outstanding. Except as otherwise provided by our articles of incorporation or Nevada law, the holders of common stock are entitled to one vote per share on all matters to be voted upon by the stockholders and any corporate action, other than the election of directors, requires a majority of the votes cast by holders entitled to vote. Subject to preferences that may be applicable to any outstanding preferred stock and except as otherwise provided by our articles of incorporation or Nevada law, the holders of common stock are entitled to receive ratably such dividends, if any, as may be declared from time to time by the board of directors out of funds legally available for that purpose. In the event of our liquidation, dissolution or winding up, the holders of common stock are entitled to share ratably in all assets remaining after payment of liabilities, subject to prior distribution rights of preferred stock, if any, then outstanding. The common stock has no preemptive rights, redemption, conversion or other subscription rights under Nevada law. The outstanding shares of common stock are fully paid and non-assessable. The rights, preferences and privileges of holders of common stock are subject to the rights of the holders of shares of our preferred stock.

Series B Common Stock

As of December 14 , 2011, there were no shares of Series B common stock outstanding. The holders of the Series B common stock previously outstanding had the same rights, preferences and privileges as the holders of the common stock, except that the holders of the Series B common stock did not have the right to vote on matters that come before the stockholders, unless otherwise required by Nevada law. Upon the consummation of our IPO on May 16, 2011, the holders of Series B common stock had the right to exchange all shares of their Series B common stock for a like number of shares of common stock. All of the holders of Series B common stock have exchanged their shares for a like number of shares of common stock.

Preferred Stock

Series A Convertible Preferred Stock

We previously had issued and outstanding shares of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock of which 378,579 outstanding shares were converted into 428,668 shares of common stock upon consummation of our initial public offering, and 1,388,124 outstanding shares were converted into 1,571,784 shares of common stock subsequently.

The following is a summary of the terms that would apply to any shares of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock that may be issued in the future. Our Series A Convertible Preferred Stock ranks senior to our common stock and on parity with our Series B Convertible Preferred Stock. Series A Convertible Preferred Stock may be converted at the holder’s option at any time into shares of our common stock at the initial rate of one share of common stock for each share of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock, subject to adjustment for certain dilution events. The 2007 issuance of warrants in connection with the Various acquisition triggered certain anti-dilution provisions relating to the Series A Convertible Preferred Stock, resulting in a downward adjustment of the conversion price for the Series A Convertible Preferred Stock. As of July 1, 2008, the Series A Convertible Preferred Stock was convertible

163

at the holder’s option into shares of common stock at the rate of 1.13 shares of common stock for each share of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock. Shares of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock carry voting rights on all matters to be voted upon by our stockholders, and on any particular matter each holder of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock is entitled to the number of votes equal to the number of whole shares of common stock into which such holder’s Series A Convertible Preferred Stock shares would be convertible as of the record date for determining the stockholders entitled to vote on the matter. Shares of our Series A Convertible Preferred Stock are entitled to receive ratably such dividends, if any, as may be declared by the board of directors. Each share of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock has a liquidation preference equal to the greater of (x) the “original issue price” (as defined in our articles of incorporation) for such share (currently $11.89 per share), plus declared and accrued but unpaid dividends, and (y) such amount as would have been payable had such share been converted into common stock immediately prior to the liquidation, dissolution or winding up. On January 25, 2010, the certificate of designation for our Series A Convertible Preferred Stock was amended and restated, eliminating our obligation to obtain the consent of certain holders of the Series A Convertible Preferred Stock (or an affiliate of such holders) before taking certain actions, including, among other things, purchasing or acquiring any of our capital stock, effecting a change of control, or declaring or paying dividends. In addition, among other things, redemption payments in the event of a change of control or a qualified IPO and redemption rights were eliminated.

Series B Convertible Preferred Stock

We previously had issued and outstanding shares of Series B Convertible Preferred Stock, all of which were converted to common stock upon consummation of our initial public offering.

The following is a summary of the terms that would apply to any share of Series B Convertible Preferred Stock that may be issued in the future. Our Series B Convertible Preferred Stock ranks senior to our common stock and on parity with our Series A Convertible Preferred Stock. Series B Convertible Preferred Stock may be converted at the holder’s option at any time into shares of our common stock at the initial rate of one share of common stock for each share of Series B Convertible Preferred Stock, subject to adjustment for certain dilution events. Shares of Series B Convertible Preferred Stock carry voting rights on all matters to be voted upon by stockholders, and on any particular matter each holder of Series B Convertible Preferred Stock is entitled to the number of votes equal to the number of whole shares of common stock into which such holder’s Series B Convertible Preferred Stock shares would be convertible as of the record date for determining the stockholders entitled to vote on the matter. Shares of our Series B Convertible Preferred Stock are entitled to receive ratably such dividends, if any, as may be declared by the board of directors. Each share of Series B Convertible Preferred Stock has a liquidation preference equal to the greater of (x) the “original issue price” (as defined in our articled of incorporation) for such share (currently $0.59208 per share), plus declared and accrued but unpaid dividends, and (y) such amount as would have been payable had such share been converted into common stock immediately prior to the liquidation, dissolution or winding up. On January 25, 2010, the certificate of designation for our Series B Convertible Preferred Stock was amended and restated to, among other changes, eliminate redemption payments in the event of a change of control or a qualified IPO and also eliminate preemptive rights.

Undesignated Preferred Stock

Subject to certain approval rights of the holders of our preferred stock, our board of directors has the authority, without action by the holders of the common stock, to designate and issue preferred stock in one or more series and to designate the rights, preferences and privileges of each series, which may be greater than the rights of the common stock. It is not possible to state the actual effect of the issuance of any shares of preferred stock upon the rights of holders of the common stock until the board of directors determines the specific rights of the holders of such preferred stock. However, the effects might include, among other things:

•

restricting dividends on the common stock;

•

diluting the voting power of the common stock;

•

impairing the liquidation rights of the common stock; or

•

delaying or preventing a change in control of us without further action by the stockholders.

164

Warrants

As of December 14 , 2011, there were a total of 285,621 warrants to purchase shares of our common stock outstanding with an exercise price of $0.0002 per share. Our warrants with an exercise price of $0.0002 per share, which were originally issued in connection with certain of our debt offerings, expired upon the consummation of our IPO on May 16, 2011 if they were not exercised at that time, except with respect to the warrants that were extended, as described below.

In August 2005, we issued 732,310 warrants (including 25,090 warrants issued as part of the placement agent’s fee) pursuant to the transactions under the 2005 Securities Purchase Agreement. The holders of these warrants were entitled to purchase one share of our common stock at a purchase price of $6.20 per share at any time prior to August 16, 2015 or the consummation of our IPO on May 16, 2011. The number of shares which could be purchased upon the exercise of these warrants and the purchase price for these shares were subject to adjustment in certain events. In August 2006, as consideration for the waiver by the holders of the warrants of certain defaults by us under the 2005 Securities Purchase Agreement, we amended the terms of 243,287 of these warrants to reduce the exercise price to $0.0002 per share.

In August 2006, we issued 441,474 warrants in connection with our offering of $5.0 million in principal amount of our 2006 Notes. The holders of these warrants were entitled to purchase one share of our common stock at a purchase price of $0.0002 per share at any time prior to the earlier to occur of August 27, 2016 or the consummation of our IPO on May 16, 2011.

In December 2007, we issued 2,250,994 warrants to 15 holders of our Series A Convertible Preferred Stock, warrants, 2006 Notes and 2005 Notes in lieu of the application of the conversion price adjustment provided for in the certificate of designation of the Series A Convertible Preferred Stock and the anti-dilution provisions in the warrants triggered by the issuance of the Series B Convertible Preferred Stock, as well as in consideration for their waivers of certain events of default under such notes. The holders of such warrants outstanding were entitled to purchase one share of our common stock at a purchase price of $0.0002 per share at any time prior to the earlier to occur of December 6, 2017 or upon the consummation of our IPO on May 16, 2011.

On October 8, 2009, we entered into an agreement with certain of our stockholders pursuant to which such stockholders agreed not to exercise any warrants or convert any convertible securities subsequently acquired by such stockholders such that the stockholders would at any time be deemed to own more than 4.99% of our shares of common stock (as determined in accordance with Rule 13d-3 promulgated under Section 13(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934), as amended. The stockholders agreed to exercise, simultaneously with the consummation of our IPO on May 16, 2011, that number of warrants beneficially owned by such stockholders on or simultaneously with the IPO such that the stockholders would beneficially own 4.75% of our shares of common stock immediately prior to the consummation of the IPO. In doing so, the stockholders had to first exercise or let expire that number of $6.20 warrants held by such stockholders that would have to be exercised in order for the stockholders to own 4.75% of our common stock. Any $6.20 warrants that the stockholders allowed to expire rather than exercise would be deemed exercised for purposes of meeting the 4.75% ownership requirement. The stockholders had to then exercise that number of $0.0002 warrants held by such stockholders that would have to be exercised, if any, in order for such stockholders to own 4.75% of our common stock. On October 8, 2009, we amended the 1,373,859 warrants with an exercise price of $0.0002 held by such stockholders on the date of the agreement such that the consummation of our initial public offering would no longer trigger the expiration of such warrants, and we agreed to amend any remaining $6.20 warrants held by such stockholders remaining after the stockholders reach 4.75% ownership in a similar fashion. Upon consummation of our IPO on May 16, 2011, the amended warrants have more limited adjustments pursuant to such warrants’ anti-dilution provisions.

All of the warrants were subject to adjustment immediately prior to the closing of our IPO on May 16, 2011 in the event that we had issued fewer than 1,343,997 shares (or options, warrants or rights) pursuant to an equity incentive or benefits plan prior to the occurrence of our IPO. The number of shares of common stock for which each warrant is exercisable was adjusted such that one such share will represent the same proportion of the fully-diluted equity of the company that such share would have represented on the date of issuance of the warrant had the actual number of shares (or options, warrants or rights) issued under an equity plan (rather than 1,343,997 shares) been deemed issued on the date of issuance of the warrant.

165

In September 2011, in connection with our acquisition of BDM Global Ventures Ltd. we issued 6,436,851 warrants to purchase shares of our common stock with exercise prices ranging from $5-$18 per share with an expiration date of December 31, 2021.

Registration Rights

Pursuant to the 2005 Security Holders Agreement, the holders of the Series A Convertible Preferred Stock were entitled to piggyback registration rights for registration under the Securities Act of the shares of common stock issuable upon the conversion of the Series A Convertible Preferred Stock or the exercise of certain warrants held by such security holders. Additionally, beginning six months after the consummation of our IPO, the holders of a majority of the shares of our common stock owned by certain of our stockholders (including common stock issuable upon the conversion of the Series A Convertible Preferred Stock or the exercise of the warrants), will be entitled to demand registration rights on behalf of such funds for the shares of common stock issuable upon the conversion of the Series A Convertible Preferred Stock or the exercise of the warrants. We are not required to effect more than three registrations pursuant to the demand registration rights. The piggyback and demand rights are subject to conditions and limitations, among them the right of an underwriter of an offering to limit the number of shares of common stock underlying the Series A Convertible Preferred Stock and the warrants for inclusion in the registration. The warrants issued in connection with the 2006 Notes and the 2005 Notes are also subject to this agreement and have registration rights thereunder. We are generally required to bear all of the expenses of all such registrations except for underwriting discounts and commissions.

On December 6, 2007, we entered into a Registration Rights Agreement, as amended, with the sellers granting the holders of the warrants issued along with the Old Senior Secured Notes certain piggyback registration rights for the registration under the Securities Act of the shares of our common stock issuable upon the conversion of the warrants. Additionally, beginning four months after the consummation of our IPO, holders of the warrants representing at least 51% of the total common stock issuable upon conversion of all such warrants are entitled to demand registration rights for the shares of common stock issuable upon the conversion of the warrants, but we are not required to effect any demand registration until 180 days after our IPO. We are not required to effect more than three registrations pursuant to the demand registration rights. The piggyback and demand rights are subject to conditions and limitations, among them the right of an underwriter of an offering to limit the number of shares of common stock underlying the warrants for inclusion in the registration. We are generally required to bear all of the expenses of all such registrations except for underwriting discounts and commissions.

On September 7, 2011, concurrently with entering into the Merger Agreement relating to our acquisition of BDM Global Ventures Ltd., the Company entered into a registration rights agreement with Global Investment Ventures LLC and Anthony R. Bobulinski which grants demand registration rights with respect to our shares of common stock and the shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise of the warrants issued in the transaction, which we refer to as the Registrable Securities. If, at any time on or after the date we are required to file our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2012 with the Securities and Exchange Commission, Global Investment Ventures LLC, Mr. Bobulinski and/or their assigns are not able to sell all of the common stock and warrants owned by them pursuant to Rule 144 (or any successor thereto) promulgated under the Securities Act free of volume and holding period restrictions set forth therein, Mr. Bobulinski, or if Mr. Bobulinski no longer holds any Registrable Securities, the holders of a majority of the Registrable Securities may request that we register under the Securities Act, the resale of all or any portion of the Registrable Securities on Form S-3 (or the then appropriate form for an offering to be made on a continuous basis pursuant to Rule 415 of the Securities Act).We are not required to effect more than one registration pursuant to the demand registration rights. The demand registration rights are subject to conditions and limitations, among them the right of an underwriter of an offering to limit the number of shares for inclusion in the registration. We are generally required to bear all of the expenses of all such registrations except for underwriting discounts and commissions.

We agreed to consummate an exchange offer pursuant to an effective registration statement to be filed with the SEC to allow the holders of the Senior Secured Notes, Cash Pay Notes and Non-Cash Pay Notes to exchange their notes for a new issue of substantially identical notes if such exchange offer process was available and could be completed as soon as reasonably practicable. In addition, we have agreed to file under certain circumstances a shelf registration statement to cover resales of the Senior Secured Notes, Cash Pay Notes and Non-Cash Pay Notes.

166

On August 1, 2011, the Company filed a registration statement on Form S-4 with the SEC, as amended, on September 19, 2011, relating to these exchange offers. In October 2011, due to interpretation of the SEC which did not allow an exchange offer for the above referenced notes, we withdrew the exchange offer. On October 18, 2011, we filed a registration statement on Form S-1 to cover resales of the Senior Secured Notes, Cash Pay Notes and Non-Cash Pay Notes. We have agreed to use our reasonable best efforts, subject to applicable law, to cause to file the shelf registration statement within 210 calendar days following the consummation of the IPO on May 16, 2011 and to cause such shelf registration statement to be declared effective on or prior to 75 days after such filing. In the event that we fail to satisfy the registration requirements within the prescribed time periods, the interest rate on the Senior Secured Notes, Cash Pay Notes and Non-Cash Pay Notes will be increased by 3.5%.

Transfer Agent and Registrar

The transfer agent and registrar for our common stock is American Stock Transfer & Trust Company. The address of the transfer agent is 59 Maiden Lane, Plaza Level, New York, New York 10038.

Listing

Our common stock is listed on NASDAQ under the symbol “FFN”.

Nevada Anti-Takeover Laws and Certain Articles and Bylaws Provisions

Provisions of Nevada law and our articles of incorporation and bylaws could make the following more difficult:

•

acquisition of us by means of a tender offer;

•

acquisition of us by means of a proxy contest or otherwise; or

•

removal of our incumbent officers and directors.

These provisions, summarized below, are expected to discourage certain types of coercive takeover practices and inadequate takeover bids. These provisions are also designed to encourage persons seeking to acquire control of us to first negotiate with our board of directors.

Requirements for Advance Notification of Stockholder Nominations and Proposals. Our bylaws establish advance notice procedures with respect to stockholder proposals and the nomination of candidates for election as directors, other than nominations made by or at the direction of the board of directors or a committee of the board of directors.

Stockholder Meetings. Our bylaws provide that special meetings of the stockholders may be called by our Chairman of the Board or our President, and must be called by certain of our officers upon the written request of the holders of not less than 75% of the voting power of our capital stock.

No Action by Written Consent. Our bylaws provide that stockholders may only take action at an annual or special meeting of stockholders and may not act by written consent, except as specifically required by our articles of incorporation or the Nevada Revised Statutes.

No Cumulative Voting. Our articles of incorporation and bylaws do not provide for cumulative voting in the election of directors.

Undesignated Preferred Stock. The authorization of undesignated preferred stock in our articles of incorporation makes it possible for our board of directors to issue preferred stock with voting or other rights or preferences that could impede the success of any attempt to change control of us. These and other provisions may have the effect of deferring hostile takeovers or delaying changes in control or management of us.

167

us if we have 200 or more stockholders of record, at least 100 of whom have addresses in Nevada, unless our articles of incorporation or bylaws in effect on the tenth day after the acquisition of a controlling interest provide otherwise. These laws provide that a person acquires a “controlling interest” whenever a person acquires shares of a subject corporation that, but for the application of these provisions of the Nevada Revised Statutes, would enable that person to exercise (1) one-fifth or more, but less than one-third, (2) one-third or more, but less than a majority or (3) a majority or more, of all of the voting power of the corporation in the election of directors. Once an acquirer crosses one of these thresholds, shares which it acquired in the transaction taking it over the threshold and within the 90 days immediately preceding the date when the acquiring person acquired or offered to acquire a controlling interest become “control shares” to which the voting restrictions described above apply. These laws may have a chilling effect on certain transactions if our articles of incorporation or bylaws are not amended to provide that these provisions do not apply to us or to an acquisition of a controlling interest, or if our disinterested stockholders do not confer voting rights in the control shares.

Nevada law also provides that directors may resist a change or potential change in control if the directors determine that the change is opposed to, or not in the best interest of, the corporation.

168

DESCRIPTION OF OTHER INDEBTEDNESS

In connection with the restructuring of Subordinated Convertible Notes issued in connection with the acquisition of Various, the Company agreed to pay $3.2 million of fees to the former owners of Various of which $1 million is payable in each of 2010 through 2012 and $250,000 is payable in the first quarter of 2013. The obligation was recorded at a present value of $2.3 million using a discount rate of 15%.

169

INTERESTS OF NAMED EXPERTS AND COUNSEL

None.

LEGAL MATTERS

The validity of the Registrable Notes is passed upon by Akerman Senterfitt, Miami, Florida and the validity of the shares of common stock issuable upon the conversion of the Non-Cash Pay Notes and the additional shares of common stock offered through this prospectus by the selling securityholders is passed upon by Brownstein Hyatt Farber Schreck, LLP, Las Vegas, Nevada.

EXPERTS

The consolidated financial statements and schedules of FriendFinder Networks Inc. at December 31, 2010 and 2009 and for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2010 appearing in this registration statement have been audited by EisnerAmper LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm as set forth in their reports thereon, appearing elsewhere herein, and are included in reliance upon such reports given on the authority of such firm as experts in accounting and auditing.

WHERE YOU CAN FIND MORE INFORMATION

We have filed with the SEC this Registration Statement on Form S-1, as amended, under the Securities Act to register with the SEC the securities described herein. This prospectus does not contain all of the information set forth in the registration statement and the exhibits and schedules to the registration statement. Statements contained in this prospectus as to the contents of any contract or other document referred to are not necessarily complete and in each instance we refer you to the copy of the contract or other document filed as an exhibit to the registration statement, each such statement being qualified in all respects by such reference. For further information with respect to our company and the common stock offered by this prospectus, we refer you to the registration statement, exhibits, and schedules.

We file annual, quarterly and special reports, proxy statements and other information with the Commission. Our Commission filings are available to the public over the Internet at the SEC’s web site at http://www.sec.gov. You also may read and copy any document we file at the SEC’s public reference room at 450 Fifth Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20549. Please call the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330 for further information on the public reference room. Our common stock is listed and traded on NASDAQ under the trading symbol “FFN.”

170

INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FRIENDFINDER NETWORKS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

FriendFinder Networks Inc. and Subsidiaries
Unaudited Financial Statements as of September 30, 2011 and the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2011 and 2010
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 (Audited)					F-2
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2011 and 2010					F-3
Consolidated Statement of Changes in Stockholders’ Deficiency for the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2011					F-4
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2011 and 2010					F-5
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements					F-6
FriendFinder Networks Inc. and Subsidiaries
Audited Financial Statements as of December 31, 2010 and 2009 and the Three Years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm					F-25
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2010 and 2009					F-26
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008					F-27
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Redeemable Preferred Stock and Stockholders’ Deficiency					F-28
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008					F-29
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements					F-31

F-1

FRIENDFINDER NETWORKS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT SHARE AND PER SHARE DATA)

	September 30, 2011			December 31, 2010
	(unaudited)
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash	$	16,470		$	34,585
Restricted cash		11,734			7,385
Accounts receivable, less allowance for doubtful accounts of $2,042 and $2,236, respectively		9,893			9,886
Inventories		793			1,028
Prepaid expenses		5,417			4,534
Deferred tax asset		6,998			5,522
Total current assets		51,305			62,940
Film costs, net		4,162			4,312
Property and equipment, net		7,805			6,666
Goodwill		332,709			326,540
Domain names		56,089			55,890
Trademarks		9,563			9,213
Other intangible assets, net		20,879			29,134
Unamortized debt costs		13,645			22,336
Deferred offering costs		—			13,267
Other assets		2,676			2,519
	$	498,833		$	532,817
LIABILITIES
Current liabilities:
Current installment of long-term debt, net of unamortized discount of $295 and $744, respectively	$	7,976		$	15,009
Accounts payable		9,030			9,481
Accrued expenses and other liabilities		71,200			65,420
Deferred revenue		44,285			48,302
Total current liabilities		132,491			138,212
Deferred tax liability		31,870			30,275
Long-term debt, net of unamortized discount of $37,342 and $31,935, respectively		453,449			510,551
Liability related to warrants		—			3,559
Total liabilities		617,810			682,597
Contingencies (Note 16)

STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIENCY
Preferred stock, $0.001 par value — authorized, 22,500,000 shares; issued and outstanding no shares in 2011 and 10,211,556 shares in 2010,
Series A Convertible Preferred Stock, $0.001 per share — authorized 2,500,000 shares; issued and outstanding, 0 in 2011, 1,766,703 shares in 2010 (liquidation preference $21,000)		—			2
Series B Convertible Preferred Stock, $0.001 per share — authorized 10,000,000 shares; issued and outstanding, 0 in 2011, 8,444,853 shares in 2010 (liquidation preference $5,000)		—			8
Common stock, $0.001 par value — authorized 125,000,000 shares in 2011 and 2010
Common stock voting — authorized 112,500,000 shares, issued and outstanding 31,186,679 shares in 2011 and 6,517,746 shares in 2010		31			6
Series B common stock non-voting — authorized 12,500,000 shares; issued and outstanding 32,965 shares in 2011 and 1,839,825 shares in 2010		—			2
Capital in excess of par value		132,551			80,823
Accumulated deficit		(251,559	)		(230,621	)
Total stockholders’ deficiency		(118,977	)		(149,780	)
	$	498,833		$	532,817

See notes to consolidated financial statements (unaudited)

F-2

FRIENDFINDER NETWORKS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT SHARE AND PER SHARE DATA)
(UNAUDITED)

	Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2011			2010
Net revenue
Service	$	234,918		$	243,447
Product		14,709			14,043
Total		249,627			257,490
Cost of revenue
Service		68,547			75,568
Product		11,259			9,222
Total		79,806			84,790
Gross profit		169,821			172,700
Operating expenses:
Product development		12,080			9,304
Selling and marketing		22,679			30,589
General and administrative		67,507			60,155
Amortization of acquired intangibles and software		11,906			18,793
Depreciation and other amortization		3,268			3,556
Total operating expenses		117,440			122,397
Income from operations		52,381			50,303
Interest expense		(65,097	)		(69,128	)
Interest related to VAT liability not charged to customers		(1,410	)		(1,742	)
Foreign exchange gain (loss), principally related to VAT liability not charged to customers		(1,521	)		436
(Loss)/gain on liability related to warrants		391			427
Loss on extinguishment of debt		(7,312	)		—
Other non-operating income (expense) net		(3,912	)		5
Loss before income tax (benefit)		(26,480	)		(19,699	)
Income tax (benefit)	$	(5,542	)	$	(219	)
Net loss	$	(20,938	)	$	(19,480	)
Net loss per common share — basic and diluted	$	(1.02	)	$	(1.42	)
Weighted average shares outstanding — basic and diluted		20,505			13,735

See notes to consolidated financial statements (unaudited)

F-3

FRIENDFINDER NETWORKS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN
STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIENCY
FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2011
(UNAUDITED)
(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT SHARE AND PER SHARE DATA)

	Preferred Stock												Common Stock
	Series A Convertible						Series B Convertible						Voting				Series B Non-Voting
	Shares			Amount			Shares			Amount			Shares		Amount		Shares			Amount			Capital in Excess of Par Value			Accumulated Deficit			Total
Balance at December 31, 2010		1,766,703		$	2			8,444,853		$	8			6,517,746	$	6		1,839,825		$	2		$	80,823		$	(230,621	)	$	(149,780	)
Conversion of Series A convertible preferred stock into common stock at ratio of 1:13 to 1:00		(1,766,703	)		(2	)								2,000,452		2
Conversion of Series B convertible preferred stock into common stock								(8,444,853	)		(8	)		8,444,853		8
Exchange of Series B common stock into common stock														1,806,860		2		(1,806,860	)		(2	)
Exercise of common stock purchase warrants														5,560,672		6								(6	)
Issuance of common stock in initial public offering														5,000,000		5								49,995						50,000
Costs related to initial public offering																								(19,992	)					(19,992	)
Beneficial conversion feature on Non-Cash Pay Second Lien Notes recorded in connection with initial public offering net of $5.7 million of related deferred taxes																								8,490						8,490
Reclassification of warrant liability due to exercise of stock warrants														174,246										3,168						3,168
Stock option compensation																								2,554						2,554
Common stock issued in acquisition of PerfectMatch.com														126,295										500						500
Common stock and warrants issued in acquisition of JigoCity														1,555,555		2								7,019						7,021
Net Loss																											(20,938	)		(20,938	)
Balance at September 30, 2011		0		$	0			0		$	0			31,186,679	$	31		32,965		$	0		$	132,551		$	(251,559	)	$	(118,977	)

See notes to consolidated financial statements (unaudited)

F-4

FRIENDFINDER NETWORKS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(IN THOUSANDS)
(UNAUDITED)

	Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2011			2010
Cash flows from operating activities
Net loss	$	(20,938	)	$	(19,480	)
Adjustment to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by operating activities:
Amortization of acquired intangibles and software		11,906			18,793
Depreciation and other amortization		3,268			3,556
Amortization of film costs		2,141			2,774
Deferred income tax benefit		(5,542	)		(219	)
Non-cash interest, including amortization of discount and debt costs		35,452			26,337
Provision for doubtful accounts		105			532
Gain on warrant liability		(391	)		(427	)
Loss on extinguishment of debt		7,312			—
Stock option compensation expense		2,554			—
Other		590			391
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Restricted cash		(4,218	)		(921	)
Accounts receivable		(112	)		1,305
Inventories		235			97
Prepaid expenses		(310	)		2,842
Film costs		(1,991	)		(2,147	)
Deferred offering costs		—			(3,258	)
Other assets		—			(1,434	)
Accounts payable		(1,465	)		(3,151	)
Accrued expenses and other liabilities		(2,972	)		(958	)
Deferred revenue		(4,017	)		4,045
Net cash provided by operating activities		21,607			28,677
Cash flows from investing activities:
Cash received from escrow in connection with acquisition		—			2,499
Purchases of property and equipment		(4,472	)		(2,659	)
Cash paid for acquisition		(2,003	)		—
Other		(49	)		(391	)
Net cash (used in) investing activities		(6,524	)		(551	)
Cash flows from financing activities:
Gross proceeds from sale of common stock voting from initial public offering		50,000			—
Payment of underwriter discount and other offering costs in connection with initial public offering		(6,724	)		—
Recovery of debt issuance costs		296			—
Repayment of long-term debt		(76,770	)		(21,921	)
Net cash (used in) financing activities		(33,198	)		(21,921	)
Net (decrease) increase in cash		(18,115	)		6,205
Cash at beginning of period		34,585			22,600
Cash at end of period	$	16,470		$	28,805
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information:
Cash Paid for:
Interest paid		29,030			31,493
Estimated income taxes paid		30			—
Non-Cash Investing and Financing Activities:
Accrued fee in connection with debt restructuring		—			12,436
Recording of beneficial conversion feature on Non-Cash Pay Second Lien Notes in connection with initial public offering, net of $5,660 of related deferred taxes		8,490			—
Deferred offering costs written off to capital in excess of par value		13,267			—
Conversion of Series A and B convertible preferred stock and series B common stock to common stock		12			—
Common Stock and warrants issued and contingent consideration liability in connection with acquisitions		8,000			—

See notes to consolidated financial statements (unaudited)

F-5

FRIENDFINDER NETWORKS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)

1. DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS

FriendFinder Networks Inc. (“FriendFinder”), together with its subsidiaries (hereinafter referred to as the “Company”), is an internet and technology company providing services in the social networking and web-based video sharing markets. The business consists of creating and operating technology platforms which run several websites throughout the world appealing to users of diverse cultures and interest groups. The Company is also engaged in entertainment activities consisting of publishing, licensing and studio production and distribution. The Company publishes PENTHOUSE and other adult-oriented magazines and digests. Additionally, the Company licenses the PENTHOUSE name for international publication of adult magazines and for use on various products and provides various adult-oriented multimedia entertainment products and services, including content for DVD and pay-per-view programming.

2. INTERIM FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

The consolidated interim financial statements included herein have been prepared pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) for reporting on the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. The information and note disclosures normally included in complete financial statements prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States (“GAAP”) have been condensed or omitted pursuant to such rules and regulations. The interim financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited financial statements and notes thereto for the year ended December 31, 2010, which are included in the Company’s Prospectus filed pursuant to Rule 424(b)(4) under the Securities and Exchange Act, as amended (the “Securities Act”) with the SEC on May 11, 2011, which forms part of the registration statement on Form S-1.

The Company’s management is responsible for this interim financial information. In the opinion of management, the accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements contain all adjustments, which are of a normal and recurring nature, necessary to present fairly the Company’s financial position as of September 30, 2011 and the results of its operations and cash flows for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010. Interim results may not be indicative of the results that may be expected for the year.

3. LIQUIDITY

Since emerging from bankruptcy protection in October 2004, FriendFinder has incurred substantial net losses and used substantial amounts of cash in its operating activities. On December 6, 2007, FriendFinder acquired Various, Inc. (“Various”), an operator of social networking and interactive multimedia websites, which has provided the cash flow necessary to fund FriendFinder’s operations. Notes issued to finance the Various acquisition restricted distributions to FriendFinder to amounts required to make interest payments on FriendFinder’s Senior Secured Notes in addition to limited amounts for operating expenses, including fees and expenses related to an initial public offering (“IPO”) of FriendFinder’s securities.

Subsequent to the acquisition, the Company had been attempting to raise funds through the sale of common stock in an IPO and use the net proceeds to repay its debt which was scheduled to mature in 2010 and 2011. In February 2010, due to market conditions, the Company suspended the offering. In July 2010, the maturity date of $46.3 million of outstanding Senior Secured Notes payable by FriendFinder scheduled to mature on July 31, 2010 was extended to January 1, 2011. On October 27, 2010, the Company completed a debt restructuring which consolidated substantially all of its debt into three tranches with maturities in 2013 and 2014 (see Note 9).

On May 16, 2011, the Company completed its IPO and issued 5,000,000 shares of common stock resulting in $43.5 million of net proceeds. On May 19, 2011, the Company redeemed $39,541,000 principal amount of long-term notes from the net proceeds of the IPO at 110% of principal (see Notes 11 and 9(b)).

F-6

FRIENDFINDER NETWORKS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)

4. NEW ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS

In December 2010, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued new authoritative accounting guidance which provides that entities with reporting units with zero or negative carrying amounts are required to determine an implied fair value of goodwill if management concludes that it is more likely than not that a goodwill impairment exists considering any adverse qualitative factors. For public entities, the new guidance is effective for fiscal years and interim periods within those years beginning after December 15, 2010. The Company adopted this guidance effective January 1, 2011, without impact to its financial statements.

In September 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued new authoritative accounting guidance which will allow entities to first assess qualitative factors to determine whether it is necessary to perform the two-step quantitative goodwill impairment test. Under these amendments, an entity would not be required to calculate the fair value of a reporting unit unless the entity determines, based on a qualitative assessment, that it is more likely than not that its fair value is less than its carrying amount. The new guidance is effective for annual and interim goodwill impairment tests performed for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2011, with early adoption permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of this guidance on its financial reporting process.

5. FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

The carrying amounts of cash, receivables and payables approximate their fair values due to the short-term nature of these financial instruments. The liability related to warrants as of December 31, 2010 was carried at fair value based on unobservable inputs (see Note 10). As of September 30, 2011, the liability for acquisition related contingent consideration was carried at fair value based on unobservable inputs, (see Note 7). As of September 30, 2011, the carrying value of long-term debt was $461,425,000 compared to its estimated fair value of $473,902,000. As of December 31, 2010, the carrying value of long-term debt was $525,560,000 compared to its estimated fair value of $550,082,000. The fair value is estimated by discounting the projected cash flows using the estimated rates at which similar amounts of debt could be borrowed at such date and through third party pricing information.

6. PER SHARE DATA

Basic and diluted net loss per common share is based on the weighted average number of shares of outstanding common stock and Series B common stock including shares underlying common stock purchase warrants which are exercisable at the nominal price of $0.0002 per share. Convertible participating securities are included in the computation of basic earnings per share using the two-class method. Inasmuch as the Series B common stock participates in any dividends and shares in the net loss on a pro rata basis with the common stock based on the total number of common shares outstanding, the net loss per common share, basic and diluted, as presented in the Company’s statements of operations is consistent with the two-class method.

Weighted average shares outstanding — basic and diluted is comprised of the following (in thousands):

	Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2011		2010
Common Stock		16,726		6,518
Series B common stock		942		1,840
Common stock purchase warrants		2,837		5,377
		20,505		13,735

In computing diluted loss per share, no effect has been given to the common shares issuable at the end of the period upon conversion or exercise of the following anti-dilutive securities that could potentially dilute basic earnings per share in future periods (in thousands):

F-7

FRIENDFINDER NETWORKS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)

6. PER SHARE DATA (Continued)

	Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2011		2010
Series A Convertible Preferred Stock		—		2,000
Series B Convertible Preferred Stock		—		8,445
Warrants		6,437		502
Convertible Non Cash pay Second Lien Notes		8,311		—
Employee stock options		608		—
Total common shares issuable		15,356		10,947

The Series A and Series B preferred stock were convertible participating securities which were converted into common stock during the three months ended June 30, 2011; however, as there was no contractual obligation for the holders of such shares to share in the losses of the Company, the preferred shares were not included in the computation of basic and diluted net loss per share (see Note 12).

For the nine months ended September 30, 2011 the above table includes warrants exercisable into 6,436,851 shares of common stock granted in connection with the acquisition of Jigo City (see note 7). In addition, the table includes 8,310,763 shares of common stock issuable on conversion of Non-Cash Pay Second Lien Notes, and 608,000 shares of common stock underlying outstanding stock options granted under the 2008 Stock Option Plan, as such notes became convertible and the stock options were considered granted for accounting purposes with consummation of the IPO in May 2011.

For the nine months ended September 30, 2010, no shares are included in the above table with respect to the conversion of the Subordinated Convertible Notes, as the number of common shares into which the notes are convertible was based upon an IPO price which was not determinable on September 30, 2010. In addition, no shares are included in the above table with respect to agreements to grant options to acquire 578,250 shares of common stock outstanding at September 30, 2010, under the 2008 Stock Option Plan as, for accounting purposes, the grant date will occur upon consummation of an IPO.

7. ACQUISITIONS

On July 12, 2011, the Company acquired substantially all the assets of PerfectMatch.com, from Matrima, Inc. for approximately $2,000,000 in cash and 126,295 shares of common stock valued at $500,000 based on the closing price of the Company’s common stock on such date. PerfectMatch.com is an online relationship service helping adults seeking lasting connections. The purchase price was allocated to software ($450,000), customer lists ($369,000) and domain names ($150,000), and the balance to goodwill ($1,531,000). The impact of the acquisition on the Company’s financial statements is not material.

On September 7, 2011, pursuant to a merger agreement, a newly-formed wholly-owned subsidiary of FriendFinder acquired the assets and assumed the liabilities of BDM Global Ventures Limited (“BDM”), a British Virgin Islands (“BVI”) limited company formed in July 2010, which, through wholly-owned BVI limited companies and their foreign subsidiaries, owns and operates JigoCity, a global social commerce organization committed to providing members, through a suite of websites, with high quality daily deals that are relevant to their individual lifestyles. BDM and its subsidiaries are hereafter referred to as JigoCity. JigoCity provides services in various cities in China and certain countries in the Asia Pacific Region, including Hong Kong, Australia and Taiwan. The acquisition of JigoCity was made to enable FriendFinder to expand into social commerce and to gain an additional way to monetize its foreign markets through utilization of its user base and website traffic-generated by its affiliate network.

As consideration for JigoCity, FriendFinder issued to the shareholders of JigoCity 1,555,555 shares of FriendFinder’s common stock and warrants exercisable for 6,436,851 shares of FriendFinder’s common stock. The warrants, which expire on December 31, 2021, have exercise prices ranging from $5.00 to $18.00 per share of which

F-8

FRIENDFINDER NETWORKS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)

7. ACQUISITIONS (Continued)

warrants to acquire approximately 2 million shares have exercise prices between $5.00 and $10.00 per share and warrants to acquire approximately 4.4 million shares have exercise prices between $11.00 and $18.00 per share. Of the merger consideration, 500,000 shares of FriendFinder common stock are to be held in escrow until December 31, 2012, subject to release on a quarterly basis, to satisfy any potential indemnification claims under the merger agreement.

Concurrently with entering into the merger agreement, FriendFinder entered into an equity put agreement with the former shareholders of JigoCity pursuant to which such shareholders have the option to sell all of their shares of common stock and warrants received as consideration in the merger back to FriendFinder in exchange for the return of 70% of the equity in JigoCity if the volume-weighted average price of FriendFinder’s common stock fails to equal or exceed $12.00 per share during any 10 trading day period between the closing date of the merger and the later of June 30, 2014 and the date upon which FriendFinder current indentures are fully discharged, or if an “indenture modification” is made, as defined under the equity put agreement, the later of June 30, 2014 and the date that the indenture modification takes place (the later date hereinafter referred to as the “Vesting Date”). The equity put agreement provides that the put right shall become exercisable at the sole discretion of the shareholders’ appointed representative during the period commencing on the Vesting Date and expiring sixty (60) days thereafter. Additionally, pursuant to the equity put agreement, if the shareholders exercise the put right, FriendFinder has a right to pay them in common stock and/or cash, having a combined value as of the later of the above dates equal to the product of (i) 2,209,414 shares of common stock (subject to dilutive adjustment) and (ii) the difference between the highest 10 day volume-weighted average price attained by FriendFinder common stock during such period and $12.00, in which case the put right terminates.

The total acquisition date fair value of the consideration transferred is estimated at $7.5 million, which includes the estimated fair value of acquisition-related contingent consideration which may be paid to JigoCity shareholders if the put option referred to above is exercised by such shareholders. In addition, legal and other acquisition-related costs of approximately $0.4 million were incurred and charged to general and administrative expense. The total acquisition date fair value of consideration transferred is estimated as follows:

Common stock	$	4,460,000
Warrants		2,560,000
Acquisition related contingent consideration		480,000
	$	7,500,000

The estimated fair value for the 1,555,555 shares of FriendFinder’s common stock issued to JigoCity shareholders was based on $2.87 per share, representing the closing price of the common stock on the NASDAQ Global Market on the date of the acquisition.

The estimated fair value of the warrants to acquire 6,436,851 shares of FriendFinder’s common stock issued to JigoCity shareholders was determined based on the Black-Scholes option pricing model using the following valuation inputs: (a) market price of $2.87 per share, which was the closing price of FriendFinder’s common stock on the acquisition date, (b) exercise prices of the warrants ranging from $5.00 to $18.00 per share, (c) contractual term of the warrants of approximately 10 years (d) risk-free interest rate of 2.05% (e) expected volatility of 35% and (f) no dividend yield. Based on the length of time FriendFinder’s shares have been traded, volatility was based on the average of historical and implied volatilities for a period comparable to the contractual term of the warrants of certain individual entities considered to be similar to FriendFinder. The risk-free interest rate is based on yields on U.S. government securities with a maturity which approximates the contractual term of the warrants.

A liability was recognized for an estimate of the acquisition date fair value of the acquisition-related contingent consideration which may be paid. The liability was measured as the present value of the put option determined based on estimated future trading prices of FriendFinder’s common stock between September 7, 2011 and June 30, 2014 and on the estimated future equity value of JigoCity during such period calculated on multiple scenarios using

F-9

FRIENDFINDER NETWORKS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)

7. ACQUISITIONS (Continued)

a Monte Carlo simulation methodology. The fair value measurement of the acquisition-related contingent consideration is based on unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and reflect FriendFinder’s own assumptions. Key assumptions include expected volatility in both the value of JigoCity and in FriendFinder’s common stock during the above period. Changes in the fair value of the contingent consideration subsequent to the acquisition date, will be recognized in earnings until the liability is eliminated or settled. As of September 30, 2011, there was no significant change in the estimated fair value of the contingent consideration.

The acquisition date fair value of consideration transferred (the “purchase price”) was allocated to tangible and identifiable intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on their estimated fair values on the acquisition date, with the remaining unallocated purchase price recorded as goodwill.

The allocation of fair value shown below is preliminary and subject to adjustment pending completion of valuations. The following table summarizes the estimated fair value of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed at the date of acquisition (in thousands):

Current assets	$	752
Identifiable intangible assets		3,336
Goodwill		4,638
Other non-current assets		609
Total assets acquired		9,335
Current liabilities		1,835
Net assets acquired	$	7,500

Of the $3.3 million of acquired identifiable intangible assets, $1.5 million was assigned to subscriber relationships, $0.3 million was assigned to vendor relationships, $0.4 million was assigned to trade names and $1.2 million was assigned to developed technology. Fair value amounts were determined using an income approach for subscriber relationships and trade names, and a cost approach for vendor relationships and developed technology. Such intangible assets are expected to have estimated useful lives of between 2 and 3 years and a weighted average useful life of approximately 2.5 years. Goodwill, which is not deductible for tax purposes, was assigned to the internet segment.

The operating results of JigoCity are included in the accompanying consolidated statement of operations from the date of acquisition. As JigoCity was formed in July 2010 and commenced its operations in the fourth quarter of 2010, the following pro forma financial information presents the combined results of the Company and JigoCity as if the acquisition had occurred as of January 1, 2011, (In thousands, except per share data):

	Nine Months Ended September 30, 2011
Net revenue	$	250,129
Net loss		(28,936	)
Net loss per common share — basic and diluted		(1.31	)
Weighted average shares outstanding		22,060

The pro forma results give effect to increased depreciation and amortization to reflect the preliminary purchase price allocation and to the issuance of 1,555,555 shares of Friendfinder’s common stock to the former owners of JigoCity. Such results are not necessarily indicative of what actually would have occurred had the acquisition been made as of such date and is not indicative of future period results.

Revenue and net loss for JigoCity for the period from September 8, 2011 to September 30, 2011, was $184,000 and $611,000, respectively.

F-10

FRIENDFINDER NETWORKS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)

7. ACQUISITIONS (Continued)

Operations of JigoCity’s foreign subsidiaries are conducted in local currencies which represents their functional currencies. Balance sheet accounts of such subsidiaries are translated from foreign currencies into U.S. dollars at the exchange rate in effect at each balance sheet date and income statement accounts are translated at the average rate of exchange prevailing during the period. Translation adjustments resulting from this process, which were not significant at September 30, 2011, will be included in accumulated other comprehensive income on the consolidated balance sheet.

8. VAT LIABILITIES

Effective July 1, 2003, as a result of a change in the law in the European Union, Various Inc. was required to collect VAT from customers in connection with their use of internet services in the European Union provided by Various and remit the VAT to the taxing authorities in the various European Union countries. As Various did not separately charge its customers for, or remit, the VAT, a liability has been recorded at the date of acquisition to reflect the estimated VAT which should have been collected and remitted on Various’ revenue derived from the various European Union countries since July 1, 2003 or other local implementation date. In addition, a liability has been recorded at the date of acquisition for interest and penalties related to the unremitted VAT and failure to file tax returns. Effective July 2008, the Company registered with the European Union and on July 29, 2008 began separately charging VAT to its customers. The aggregate liability included in accrued expenses and other liabilities, which is denominated in Euros, amounted to $42,842,000 and $42,235,000 at September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively, and includes VAT ($21,667,000 and $22,740,000), interest ($12,784,000 and $11,334,000) and penalties ($8,390,000 and $8,161,000). The consolidated statements of operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010 respectively, include foreign currency transaction gain (loss) of $(4,584,000) and $436,000 related to the liability, respectively, and interest related to VAT of $666,000 and $1,742,000, respectively. As of September 30, 2011 the Company has reached settlement with the taxing authority of certain European Union countries related to VAT for periods prior to July 1, 2008 and has not yet reached settlement or has reached partial settlement, with the taxing authority in the following European Union countries: Cyprus, Germany, Italy, Luxembourg, Netherlands, Portugal and Sweden. The liability as of September 30, 2011 includes $19,249,000 of VAT liability for countries that we have reached settlements with, including a gain of $9,359,000 which we are deferring until we have completed all the terms and conditions of each country’s settlements. Settlements have not been reached for the $21,035,000 balance of the VAT liability. In addition, the Company has $2,558,000 in VAT liability related to current VAT charged to customers. On October 8, 2009, the Company agreed that if the costs of eliminating the pre-acquisition VAT liabilities are less than $29 million, then the principal of the Subordinated Convertible Notes issued to the former owners of Various would be increased for the unused portion of the $29 million plus interest on such difference. Gain on settlement of VAT liabilities will be recognized upon the Company satisfying the conditions of the settlement and to the extent the aggregate carrying amount of settled VAT liabilities exceeds the agreed settlement amounts and the then potential maximum increase in the principal of the Subordinated Convertible Notes. In October 2010, the Subordinated Convertible Notes were exchanged for Non-Cash Pay Second Lien Notes and in connection therewith, the Company agreed that the principal increase would apply to the Non-Cash Pay Second Lien Notes. Various has been notified that the German tax authorities and the Office of the District Attorney in Bonn have been investigating Various’ former Chief Executive Officer for alleged intentional evasion of VAT on revenue collected from customers located in Germany commencing in 2003. Various negotiated a settlement with the German authorities to drop criminal charges against a current officer by payment of approximately $2.6 million which represents a portion of the total amount of the uncollected German VAT liability. The settlement was paid in six equal monthly installments of approximately $430,000 commencing on April 1, 2009. In connection with the settlement the Company paid a fine of €25,000 to a charitable organization. On April 18, 2008, a court in Germany granted authorities a search and seizure order that allowed them to seize documents from Various’ office located in Germany in order to determine the amount of revenue subject to VAT. The German tax authority has attempted unsuccessfully to freeze assets in bank accounts maintained by subsidiaries of Various in Germany, but did freeze assets in the amount of €610,343 held by Various’ credit card processor located in the

F-11

FRIENDFINDER NETWORKS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)

8. VAT LIABILITIES (Continued)

Netherlands to secure the VAT estimated by the revenue tax authorities to be due from Various from revenue from internet websites in Germany. At September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the frozen Euros included in restricted cash approximated $830,000 and $818,000, respectively.

9. LONG-TERM DEBT

Long-term debt consists of the following (in thousands):

	September 30, 2011					December 31, 2010
	Principal			Unamortized Discount		Principal			Unamortized Discount
Debt issued by FriendFinder and INI on October 27, 2010^(a)
14% New First Lien Notes due 2013^(b)(e)	$	235,332		$	6,484	$	305,000		$	10,974
14% Cash Pay Second Lien Notes due 2013^(c)(e)		10,631			159		13,778			262
11.5% Non-Cash Pay Second Lien Notes, due 2014^(d)(e)		250,849			30,755		237,211			20,986
Other (f)		2,250			239		2,250			457
	$	499,062		$	37,637	$	558,239		$	32,679
Less: unamortized discount		(37,637	)				(32,679	)
Less: current installment of long-term debt, net of unamortized discount $295 and $744, respectively		(7,976	)				(15,009	)
	$	453,449				$	510,551

(a)

On October 27, 2010, $305,000,000 principal amount of 14% Senior Secured Notes due 2013 were co-issued by FriendFinder and its wholly-owned subsidiary Interactive Network, Inc (“INI”), the parent of Various, (the “New First Lien Notes”) of which (a) $200,185,000 was exchanged for $130,485,000 outstanding principal amount of the former First Lien Notes, $49,361,000 outstanding principal amount of the former Second Lien Notes and $14,551,000 outstanding principal amount of the former Senior Secured Notes, (b) $91,400,000 was issued for cash proceeds of $89,572,000 before payment of related fees and expenses of $5,834,000 and (c) $13,415,000 was issued to pay commitment fees to the holders of the former First and Second Lien Notes. Cash of $86,237,000 was used to redeem $36,608,000 outstanding principal amount of the former First Lien Notes at 102% of principal, $30,639,000 outstanding principal amount of former Second Lien Notes (representing the remaining outstanding principal amounts of First and Second Lien Notes) and $18,258,000 outstanding principal amount of former Senior Secured Notes. Cash was also used to pay $4,132,000 of accrued interest on the exchanged and redeemed notes, an $825,000 redemption premium on certain exchanged First Lien Notes and $435,000 in commitment fees to certain noteholders.

The remaining $13,502,000 outstanding principal amount of former Senior Secured Notes were exchanged for $13,778,000 principal amount of 14% Cash Pay Second Lien Notes due 2013 co-issued by FriendFinder and INI (the “Cash Pay Second Lien Notes”). Subordinated Convertible Notes and Subordinated Term Notes, with outstanding principal amounts of $180,184,000 and $42,811,000 respectively, together with accrued interest of $9,462,000, were exchanged for $232,457,000 principal amount of 11.5% Non-Cash Pay Second Lien Notes due 2014 co-issued by FriendFinder and INI (the “Non-Cash Pay Second Lien Notes”).

The Company determined that the New First Lien Notes were not substantially different from the outstanding First Lien and Second Lien Notes for which they were exchanged, nor were the Non-Cash Pay Second Lien Notes substantially different from the outstanding Subordinated Convertible Notes for which they were exchanged, based on the less than 10% difference in present values of cash flows of the respective debt instruments and, therefore, such exchanges were accounted for as if the outstanding notes were not extinguished. Accordingly, a new effective interest rate was determined for the outstanding notes based on the carrying amount of such notes and the revised cash flows of the newly issued notes. In connection therewith, commitment fees paid to the note holders, together with an allocable portion of existing unamortized discount,

F-12

FRIENDFINDER NETWORKS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)

9. LONG-TERM DEBT (Continued)

debt issuance and debt modification costs will be amortized as an adjustment of interest expense over the remaining term of the new notes using the effective interest method. The effective interest rate on the New First Lien Notes and on the Non-Cash Pay Second Lien Notes which were exchanged for the Subordinated Convertible Notes is 19.0% and 14.3% respectively. Private placement fees related to the New First Lien Notes together with legal and other fees aggregating $4,562,000 allocated to the exchanges were charged to other finance expenses.

The Company determined that the New First Lien Notes and Cash Pay Second Lien Notes were substantially different than the outstanding $28,053,000 principal amount of Senior Secured Notes for which they were exchanged based on the more than 10% difference in present values of cash flows of the respective debt instruments and, accordingly, the exchanges were accounted for as an extinguishment of the Senior Secured Notes. The Company recorded a pre-tax loss on debt extinguishment of $10.5 million related to such exchanged Senior Secured Notes and to the Senior Secured Notes and First and Second Lien Notes redeemed for cash. The loss is based on the excess of the fair value of the new notes issued, which was determined to be their issue price of $28,053,000 and cash paid on redemption over the carrying amounts of the extinguished notes. In addition, the loss included the write-off of unamortized costs and fees aggregating $8,646,000 related to the notes which were extinguished.

The Company also determined that the Non-Cash Pay Second Lien Notes were substantially different than the non-convertible Subordinated Term Notes for which they were exchanged based on the conversion feature in the new notes and, accordingly, the exchange was accounted for as an extinguishment of the Subordinated Term Notes. The Company determined that the estimated fair value of the $48,760,000 principal amount of Non-Cash Pay Second Lien Notes exchanged was $45,726,000, resulting in an approximate effective interest rate of 11.9%, and discount of $3,034,000 which resulted in debt extinguishment gain of $3,034,000.

(b)

The New First Lien Notes, approximately $77,158,000 principal amount of which are held by a more than 10% stockholder at September 30, 2011, were issued with an original issue discount of $6,100,000, or 2.0%. The notes mature on September 30, 2013 and accrue interest at a rate per annum equal to 14.0%. Interest on the notes is payable quarterly on March 31, June 30, September 30 and December 31 of each year. Principal on the New First Lien Notes is payable quarterly to the extent of 75% of Excess Cash Flow, as defined, at 102% of principal, subject to the pro-rata sharing with the Cash Pay Second Lien Notes. Principal of $23.4 million was paid on the New First Lien Notes from excess cash flow in the quarters prior to our IPO in May 2011, of which $14.1 million was paid in the quarter ended March 31, 2011 and $9.3 million was paid in May 2011. An additional $8.5 and $6.9 million of principal was redeemed in August and November 2011 with excess cash flow for the quarters ended June 30, and September 30, 2011 respectively. The New First Lien Notes are guaranteed by domestic subsidiaries of FriendFinder and INI and are collateralized by a first-priority lien on all of the Company’s assets as well as a pledge of stock of subsidiaries. The New First Lien Notes are redeemable prior to maturity at the option of the Company, in whole but not in part, at 110% of principal, plus accrued and unpaid interest. Noteholders have the option of requiring the Company to repay the New First Lien Notes and Cash Pay Second Lien Notes in full upon a Change of Control, as defined, at 110% of principal. The Company shall also repay the New First Lien Notes and, in certain circumstances, the Cash Pay Second Lien Notes, with proceeds received from any debt or equity financing (including a secondary offering) and asset sales of more than $25 million at 110% of principal, and with proceeds from other asset sales, insurance claims, condemnation and other extraordinary cash receipts at principal, subject to certain exceptions.

On May 19, 2011, the Company redeemed $37,832,000 principal amount of New First Lien notes and $1,709,000 principal amount of Cash Pay Second Lien notes from the net proceeds of the IPO and incurred a loss on extinguishment of debt of approximately $7.3 million consisting of a redemption premium of $3.9 million and write-off of discount and deferred offering costs of $3.4 million.

F-13

FRIENDFINDER NETWORKS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)

9. LONG-TERM DEBT (Continued)

(c)

Principal of $1.1 million was paid on the Cash Pay Second Lien Notes from excess cash flow in the quarters prior to our IPO in May 2011, of which $0.6 million was paid in the quarter ended March 31, 2011 and $0.5 million was paid in May 2011. An additional $0.4 and $0.03 million of principal was redeemed in August and November 2011 with excess cash flow from the quarters ended June and September 2011. The Cash Pay Second Lien Notes are collateralized by a fully subordinated second lien on substantially all of the assets of the Company, pari passu with the Non-Cash Pay Second Lien Notes, and will vote with the New First Lien Notes on a dollar for dollar basis on all matters except for matters relating to collateral, liens and enforcement of rights and remedies. As to such matters, the Cash Pay Second Lien Notes will vote with the Non-Cash Pay Second Lien Notes.

(d)

The Non-Cash Pay Second Lien Notes, approximately $167,279,000 principal amount of which are held by more than 10% stockholders and affiliates, including $1,869,000 to entities controlled by certain officers and directors at September 30, 2011, mature on April 30, 2014 and bear interest at 11.5%, payable semi-annually on June 30 and December 31, which may be paid in additional notes at the Company’s option. While the New First Lien Notes are in place, interest must be paid with additional notes. During 2010 and 2011, interest amounting to $4,752,000 and $13,640,000, respectively, was paid through the issuance of additional Non-Cash Pay Second Lien Notes. The Non-Cash Pay Second Lien Notes are guaranteed by the domestic subsidiaries of FriendFinder and INI and collateralized by a second priority lien on all of the Company’s assets and a pledge of the stock of subsidiaries; however, such security interest is subordinate to the prior payment of the New First Lien Notes. The Non-Cash Pay Second Lien Notes are redeemable, at the option of the Company, in whole but not in part, at 100% of principal plus accrued and unpaid interest. Upon the payment in full of the New First Lien Notes, principal on the Non-Cash Pay Second Lien Notes is payable quarterly to the extent of 75% of Excess Cash Flow, as defined, at 102% of principal subject to pro-rata sharing with the Cash Pay Second Lien Notes. Upon an IPO, if the New First Lien Notes are paid in full, the net proceeds must be used to redeem the Non-Cash Pay Second Lien Notes and Cash Pay Second Lien Notes on a pro-rata basis at 110% of principal plus accrued and unpaid interest. In addition, noteholders have the option of requiring the Company to repay the Non-Cash Pay Second Lien Notes in full upon a Change of Control, as defined, at 110% of principal plus accrued and unpaid interest. If the New First Lien Notes are paid in full, the Company shall repay the Non-Cash Pay Second Lien Notes and Cash Pay Second Lien Notes on a pro-rata basis with proceeds received from any debt or equity financing (including a secondary offering), and asset sales of more than $25 million at 110% of principal plus accrued and unpaid interest and with proceeds of other asset sales, insurance claims, condemnation and other extraordinary cash receipts at principal, subject to certain exceptions. As a result of the consummation of the IPO in May 2011, the Non-Cash Pay Second Lien Notes became convertible into 8,310,763 shares of common stock at an IPO price of $10.00 per share. As a result thereof, a beneficial conversion feature of $14,150,000 related to the Non-Cash Pay Second Lien Notes was recognized and recorded as a discount on the notes with a corresponding increase to additional paid-in capital. In addition, a related deferred tax liability of approximately $5.7 million resulting from the difference between the carrying value of the notes and their tax basis attributable to recording the note discount was recognized with a corresponding reduction to additional paid-in capital. The beneficial conversion feature was measured based on the difference, on the deemed issuance date of the notes, between (a) the adjusted conversion price of the notes, calculated based on the fair value of the notes (which was less than stated principal) and (b) the estimated fair value of the Company’s common stock, multiplied by the 8,310,763 shares obtainable on conversion.

As described in Note 8, if the costs of eliminating the pre-acquisition VAT liabilities is less than $29 million, exclusive of costs paid from an escrow fund which was set up in connection with the acquisition, then the

F-14

FRIENDFINDER NETWORKS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)

9. LONG-TERM DEBT (Continued)

principal amount of the Non-Cash Pay Second Lien Notes will be increased by the issuance of additional such notes for the unused portion of the $29 million, plus interest at 6% on the increased principal from the date of acquisition.

(e)

The New First Lien Notes, the Cash Pay Second Lien Notes and Non-Cash Pay Second Lien Notes (1) require the Company to maintain minimum specified levels of EBITDA and liquidity and financial ratios, including debt and coverage ratios, all as defined; (2) provides for certain limitations including limits on indebtedness, lease obligations, VAT payments and investments; and (3) prohibits dividends and other payments with respect to the Company’s equity securities.

As described above, the new First Lien Notes, the Cash Pay Second Lien Notes and the Non-Cash Pay Second Lien Notes were co-issued by FriendFinder and its wholly-owned subsidiary INI and guaranteed by their domestic subsidiaries, which are 100% owned directly or indirectly by FriendFinder. FriendFinder and INI are holding companies and have no independent assets or operations. The subsidiary guarantees are full and unconditional and joint and several and any subsidiaries of FriendFinder other than the subsidiary guarantors are minor.

The Company had agreed to consummate an exchange offer pursuant to an effective registration statement to be filed with the SEC to allow the holders of the New First Lien Notes, Cash Pay Second Lien Notes and Non-Cash Pay Second Lien Notes to exchange their notes for a new issue of substantially identical notes. In addition, the Company has agreed to file, under certain circumstances, a shelf registration statement to cover resales of the New First Lien Notes, Cash Pay Second Lien Notes and Non-Cash Pay Second Lien Notes. On August 1, 2011, the company filed a registration statement on Form S-4 with the SEC relating to the exchange offer. In October, 2011, due to interpretations of applicable laws and regulations from the staff of the SEC which did not allow an exchange offer for the above referenced notes, the Company withdrew its exchange offer. On October 17, 2011, the Company filed a registration statement on Form S-1 to cover re-sales of the New First Lien Notes, Cash Pay Second Lien Notes and Non-Cash Pay Second Lien Notes. The Company has agreed under the indentures governing the above referenced notes to use its reasonable best efforts, subject to applicable law, to (i) cause such registration statement to become effective 75 days after the filing date and (ii) keep the registration statement continuously effective until the earlier to occur of (A) the third anniversary of the issue date of the respective notes and (B) such time as there are no notes outstanding. In the event that the Company fails to satisfy the registration requirements within the prescribed time periods, the interest rate on the New First Lien Notes, Cash Pay Second Lien Notes and Non-Cash Pay Second Lien Notes will be increased by 3.5%.

(f)

Principal of long-term debt outstanding at September 30, 2011, matures as follows (in thousands):

Twelve months ending September 30,
2012	$	8,271
2013		239,942
2014		250,849
Total	$	499,062

As described above, principal payments on the New First Lien Notes and Cash Pay Second Lien Notes may be accelerated depending on the excess cash flows of the Company. On November 4, 2011 the Company repaid an aggregate of approximately $7.3 million of principal on the New First Lien Notes and Cash Pay Second Lien Notes under such excess cash flow repayment calculation related to excess cash flow generated in the

F-15

FRIENDFINDER NETWORKS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)

9. LONG-TERM DEBT (Continued)

quarter ended September 30, 2011, which principal amounts are reflected in the 2012 maturities in the above table.

10. LIABILITY RELATED TO WARRANTS

In conjunction with its August 2005 issuance of Senior Secured Notes, the Company issued warrants to purchase 501,663 shares of the Company’s common stock (of which 476,573 were exercisable at $6.20 per share and 25,090 were exercisable at $10.25 per share) that contained a provision that required a reduction of the exercise price if certain equity events occur. Under the provisions of authoritative accounting guidance which became effective for the Company at January 1, 2009, such a reset provision no longer makes the warrants eligible for equity classification and as such, effective January 1, 2009, the Company classified these warrants as a liability measured at fair value with changes in fair value reflected in operations. In connection therewith, the statement of operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2011, and the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010 reflects a gain/(loss) of $272,000, ($57,000) and $427,000, respectively.

The warrants, which were exercisable until August 2015, provided that they would terminate if not exercised concurrently with the consummation of an IPO. On May 16, 2011, concurrently with the consummation of the Company’s IPO, warrants to issue 457,843 shares of common stock at $6.20 per share were net settled, whereby 174,246 shares of common stock were issued upon exercise, equivalent to the intrinsic value of the warrants based on the IPO price of $10 per share, and the Company did not receive any cash proceeds. In addition, warrants to acquire 24,104 common shares at $10.25 per share were terminated as they were not exercised. Accordingly, in May 2011, the liability related to the warrants was eliminated with the carrying value of $3,168,000 related to the exercised warrants transferred to capital in excess of par value and the carrying value of $119,000 related to the terminated warrants recorded as non-operating income.

The Company’s warrants were measured at fair value based on the binomial options pricing model using valuation inputs which are based on management’s internal assumptions (which are not readily observable) at May 16, 2011 and December 31, 2010 respectively as follows: 1) dividend yield of 0% and 0%; 2) volatility of 43.2%; and 43.3%, 3) risk-free interest rate of 2.3%; and 1.9%; and 4) expected life of 4.25 years and 4.50 years.

11. CAPITAL STOCK

On May 16, 2011, the Company issued 5,000,000 shares of common stock at a price of $10.00 per share and completed its IPO. The Company raised gross proceeds of $50.0 million, less underwriting fees and commissions of 7.25% of the gross proceeds, or $3.6 million, and incurred other offering expenses of $2.9 million to be paid from the proceeds of the offering, resulting in $43.5 million of net proceeds. In addition, the Company had incurred and paid as of December 31, 2010, $13.3 million of offering costs, which are included in deferred offering costs in the accompanying balance sheet at December 31, 2010. In connection with the completion of the IPO, all offering costs were charged to capital in excess of par value.

In connection with the consummation of the IPO (i) 378,579 outstanding shares of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock were converted into 428,668 shares of common stock (ii) all of the outstanding shares of Series B Convertible Preferred Stock were converted into 8,444,853 shares of common stock (iii) 1,806,860 shares of Series B Common Stock were exchanged for 1,806,860 shares of common stock and (iv) 5,734,918 shares of common stock were issued upon exercise of outstanding warrants. Subsequent to the IPO, 1,388,124 outstanding shares of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock were converted into 1,571,784 shares of common stock.

On July 12, 2011 in connection with the acquisition of PerfectMatch.com the Company issued consideration of 126,925 shares of common stock (see Note 7).

On September 7, 2011, in connection with the acquisition of JigoCity the Company issued 1,555,555 shares of common stock and warrants exercisable into 6,436,851shares of common stock. (See Note 7)

F-16

FRIENDFINDER NETWORKS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)

12. WARRANTS

As of September 30, 2011, outstanding warrants to purchase voting common stock of the Company are as follows:

Expiration Date⁽¹⁾	Exercise Price
August 2015	$	6.20	476,573	457,843	457,843		—
August 2015	$	10.25	25,090	24,104	24,104		—
August 2015	$	0.0002	243,287	233,726	204,135		29,591
August 2016	$	0.0002	441,474	424,120	370,427		53,693
December 2017	$	0.0002	4,692,996	5,188,509	4,986,172	,	202,337
December 2021⁽⁴⁾	$	5.00-18.00	6,436,851	—	—		6,436,851
			12,316,271	6,328,302	6,042,681		6,722,472

(1)

Except for warrants to purchase 1,373,859 shares of common stock at $0.0002 per share, which were amended on October 8, 2009, all outstanding warrants would have terminated if not exercised concurrently with the consummation of the IPO.

(2)

The number of shares of common stock for which each warrant was exercisable, except for warrants exercisable at $10.25, were decreased immediately prior to the closing of the IPO as the Company has issued prior to such IPO fewer than 1,343,997 shares or options pursuant to an equity incentive or benefit plan. The adjustment provision for warrants exercisable at $10.25 was triggered as the Company had issued fewer than 588,890 shares or options pursuant to an equity incentive or benefit plan prior to the closing of the IPO.

(3)

With respect to warrants to acquire 2,441,989 common shares at $0.0002 per share, in order to maintain the warrant holders’ percentage of fully diluted equity, the number of shares of common stock for which such warrants were exercisable was increased by 680,034 immediately prior to the closing of the IPO based on the number of shares of common stock into which the Non-Cash Pay Second Lien Notes which were exchanged for Subordinated Convertible Notes issued to selling stockholders in the acquisition of Various, were convertible based on the IPO price.

(4)

Warrants were issued in connection with the acquisition of JigoCity. (see Note 7)

Concurrently with the consummation of the IPO on May 16, 2011, 5,734,918 common shares were issued on exercise of 6,018,577 warrants and warrants to acquire 24,104 common shares at $10.25 per share were terminated. In addition as of September 30, 2011, warrants to purchase 285,621 shares of common stock at $0.0002 per share, which expire in December 2017, remained outstanding.

13. STOCK COMPENSATION EXPENSE

On April 3, 2008, the Company’s Board of Directors adopted the 2008 Stock Option Plan (the “Plan”), which was amended and restated and approved by our stockholders on February 1, 2010. The maximum number of shares for which stock options may be granted under the Plan is 1,343,997 shares, subject to adjustment. Stock options may be issued to employees, directors and consultants, selected by the compensation committee of the Board of Directors. Under the terms of the Plan, the options granted will expire no later than 10 years from the date of grant and will vest 20% on the first anniversary of the grant date and 20% on each succeeding four anniversaries of the grant date, provided, however, that an optionee may exercise the vested portion of a stock option only after that date which is 18 months after the date of the Company’s IPO on May 16, 2011. The exercise price of an option shall be the closing price of the common stock on a national securities exchange on the date immediately preceding the date of grant. The exercise price per share of any stock option agreement issued prior to May 16, 2011 was set at $10.00 per share, representing the price per share that the Company’s common stock was sold to the public pursuant to the IPO on May 16, 2011.

F-17

FRIENDFINDER NETWORKS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)

13. STOCK COMPENSATION EXPENSE (Continued)

From adoption through December 31, 2010 and the nine months ended September 30, 2011, the Company issued agreements to grant options to purchase a total of 777,500 and 3,000 shares of the Company’s common stock, respectively to employees, non-employee directors as well as to one board advisor under the Plan. In addition, through December 31, 2010, and the nine months ended September 30, 2011, options for 225,500 and 22,000 shares, respectively, under such agreements were deemed forfeited. On July 7, 2008, the board of directors authorized the execution of agreements covering the grant of options to each of the two former owners of Various at the consummation of an IPO to each purchase 37,500 shares of our common stock pursuant to our 2008 Stock Option Plan. These options were issued in May, 2011. The exercise price of these options was the share price offered to the public at the time of the Company’s IPO.

Upon the successful completion of the IPO on May 16, 2011, compensation cost was accrued for each vesting tranche over the requisite service period commencing on the date the options were granted and ending on the later of the vesting date or 18 months after the date of the IPO. Accordingly, in the quarter ended June 30, 2011, a cumulative adjustment of approximately $2 million was made to record compensation cost which accrued prior to May 16, 2011, based on the fair value of the options on the IPO date. From the IPO date to June 30, 2011 and the three months ended September 30, 2011, additional compensation cost was recorded of $311,000 and $269,000, respectively.

As of September 30, 2011, there were outstanding options to acquire 608,000 common shares under the Plan having a weighted average remaining contractual life of 6.5 years with a weighted average grant date fair value of $8.38. Of such options, 351,300 were vested and none were exercisable. Outstanding stock options had no intrinsic value as of September 30, 2011. As of September 30, 2011 there was approximately $350,000 of unrecognized compensation cost related to outstanding stock options which will be recognized over a weighted average period of 2.3 years.

14. INCOME TAXES

The income tax (benefit) expense computed based on the Company’s estimated annual effective tax rate, except for the discrete tax benefit described below, consists of the following (in thousands):

	For the Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2011			2010
Current:
Federal	$	—		$	73
State		—			285
	$	—		$	358
Deferred:
Federal	$	(4,849	)	$	(505	)
State		(693	)		(72	)
		(5,542	)		(577	)
Total tax (benefit)	$	(5,542	)	$	(219	)

The Company records a valuation allowance when it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. The tax benefit in the nine month period ended September 30, 2011, relates to a reduction in the valuation allowance resulting from the recording of an approximately $5.7 million deferred tax liability related to a beneficial conversion feature which was charged to additional paid-in capital in the nine month period ended September 30, 2011 (see Note 9(c)). Of such benefit, $4.9 million, which relates to the reversal in future years of debt discount arising from the beneficial conversion feature, has been recognized as a discrete event in the nine month period. The remaining benefit of $0.8 million resulting from the reduction in the valuation

F-18

FRIENDFINDER NETWORKS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)

14. INCOME TAXES (Continued)

allowance which relates to the reversal of debt discount in the current year, is being accounted for as an adjustment to the estimated annual effective tax rate and is being allocated to the interim periods in 2011. As the Company anticipates that its net deferred tax assets at December 31, 2011 will be fully offset by a valuation allowance, no additional tax benefit has been recognized for the nine months ended September 30, 2011.

The tax benefit recognized for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 was limited based on the Company anticipating that its net deferred tax assets at December 31, 2010 would be offset by a valuation allowance.

15. SEGMENT INFORMATION

The Company’s reportable segments consist of Internet and Entertainment. For the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively, the Entertainment Segment recorded revenue of $152,000 and $561,000, respectively, from advertising services provided to the Internet segment. Certain corporate expenses and interest expense are not allocated to segments. Segment assets include intangible, fixed, and all others identified with each segment. Unallocated corporate assets consist primarily of cash, certain prepaid items related to indebtedness and deferred tax assets not assigned to one of the segments.

Information for the Company’s segments is as follows (in thousands):

	September 30, 2011		December 31, 2010
Assets:
Internet	$	475,461	$	506,297
Entertainment		19,115		17,739
Unallocated corporate		4,257		8,781
Total	$	498,833	$	532,817

	For the Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2011			2010
Net revenue from external customers:
Internet	$	233,319		$	241,476
Entertainment		16,308			16,014
Total	$	249,627		$	257,490
Income from operations:
Internet	$	59,619		$	52,149
Entertainment		(227	)		2,234
Total segment income	$	59,392		$	54,383
Unallocated corporate		(7,011	)		(4,080	)
Total	$	52,381		$	50,303

For the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, included in income from operations are amortization of acquired intangibles and software of $6,313,000 and $18,793,000, respectively, and depreciation and other amortization of $1,112,000 and $3,556,000 respectively, all of which were incurred by the Internet segment.

F-19

FRIENDFINDER NETWORKS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)

15. SEGMENT INFORMATION (continued)

Net revenues by service and product are as follows (in thousands):

	Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2011		2010
Internet:
Subscription based service	$	172,511	$	185,099
Pay by usage service		60,660		56,280
Social Commerce		146		—
Advertising		2		97
		233,319		241,476
Entertainment
Magazine		7,439		8,261
Video entertainment		7,223		5,782
Licensing		1,646		1,971
		16,308		16,014
Total revenue	$	249,627	$	257,490

The Company derives revenue from international websites and other foreign sources. Revenues by geographical area based on where the customer is located or the subscription originates are as follows (in thousands):

	Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2011		2010
Net revenue:
United States	$	136,874	$	139,412
Europe		70,538		79,945
Canada		14,042		13,309
Other		28,173		24,824
Total	$	249,627	$	257,490

Principally all long-lived assets are located in the United States.

16. CONTINGENCIES

(a)

On December 28, 2007, Broadstream Capital Partners, Inc. (“Broadstream”) filed a lawsuit against the Company in the State Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles, Central District, and the Company subsequently removed the case to the Federal District Court for the Central District of California. The complaint alleged breach of contract, breach of covenant of good faith and fair dealing, breach of fiduciary duty and constructive fraud arising out of a document titled “Non-Disclosure Agreement.” The complaint alleged, among other things, that Broadstream entered into a Non-Disclosure Agreement with the Company that required Broadstream’s prior written consent for the Company to knowingly acquire Various or any of its subsidiaries and that such consent was not obtained. On April 7, 2008, Broadstream filed its First Amended Complaint, which added a new cause of action for intentional interference with prospective economic advantage. On February 20, 2009, Broadstream filed its Third Amended Complaint, which dismissed the allegations of breach of fiduciary duty and constructive fraud. The complaint sought damages which plaintiff alleges to be in excess of $20 million, plus interest, costs and punitive damages. Broadstream later asserted up to $557 million in damages plus punitive damages. On July 20, 2009, the Company entered into an agreement with Broadstream under which, without admitting liability, the Company agreed to pay Broadstream

F-20

FRIENDFINDER NETWORKS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)

16. CONTINGENCIES (Continued)

$3.0 million in $1.0 million installments due no later than July 2009, January 2010 and July 2010. Such payments were timely made. The agreement provided that upon the earlier of twelve months after the Company has securities registered under Section 12(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or eighteen months after the effective date of the agreement, but not later than twelve months following such earlier date, Broadstream had to choose either to (i) refile its complaint in Federal District Court provided that it first repay the Company the $3.0 million or (ii) demand arbitration. If Broadstream elected arbitration, the parties agreed that there would be an arbitration award to Broadstream of at least $10.0 million but not more than $47.0 million. Giving consideration of the limitation of the arbitration award in relation to damages sought in litigation, management had not concluded that it was probable that Broadstream would demand arbitration. Accordingly, no loss had been provided for as a result of entering into the agreement. In the event that Broadstream elected arbitration, at such time the Company would recognize a loss in connection with the matter of $13.0 million to $50.0 million.

In December 2010, Broadstream elected arbitration. Accordingly, at December 31, 2010 the Company recognized a loss in connection with the matter of $13.0 million and recorded a liability to Broadstream of $10.0 million (included in accrued expenses and other liabilities). In the event that the liability exceeded $15.0 million (exclusive of $3.0 million the Company already paid to Broadstream), it would constitute an event of default under the agreements governing the New First Lien Notes, Cash Pay Second Lien Notes and Non-Cash Pay Second Lien Notes.

On July 6, 2011, the Company entered into a settlement agreement with Broadstream pursuant to which the arbitration and related litigation and all claims asserted therein were agreed to be dismissed and the Company agreed to pay Broadstream $15 million of which $8 million was paid on July 13, 2011, $5 million was paid in September 2011 and $2 million is payable no later than January 2, 2012. As a result of the settlement, the Company recognized an additional loss of $5 million (included in other non-operating expense) in the quarter ended June 30, 2011.

(b)

On December 23, 2005, Robert Guccione, our former president, filed an action against the Company and some of its officers, among other defendants, in New York State Court for breach of contract, fraud, unjust enrichment, promissory estoppel, failure to pay severance and conspiracy to defraud. The amount of damages requested in the complaint against the Company is approximately $9.0 million and against the officers is in excess of $10.0 million. Some of the counts in the complaint also demand an unspecified amount of damages. Guccione filed an amended complaint on June 5, 2007 to include additional claims relating to ownership of certain United Kingdom, Jersey and Guernsey trademarks and added as a party Penthouse Publications Limited, an entity with no current affiliation with the Company, as party plaintiff. Guccione agreed to dismiss the count for conspiracy to defraud only. Guccione filed a Second Amended Complaint on December 14, 2007 adding General Media International, Inc. (an entity with no current affiliation with the Company) as party plaintiff and a new claim for inducement to breach of contract. The Company filed its motion to dismiss the Second Amended Complaint on January 31, 2008, which was granted in part and denied in part. The court dismissed the claims for unjust enrichment and promissory estoppel. The Company filed its Answer and Affirmative Defenses to the Second Amended Complaint on June 25, 2009. On August 14, 2008, Guccione filed a voluntary petition for Chapter 7 Bankruptcy. Guccione filed a dismissal of the bankruptcy proceedings on November 4, 2009. The Court dismissed the bankruptcy action on November 9, 2009. The settlement agreement between Guccione and his judgment creditors assigns all rights to the New York state court action to his judgment creditors. On January 8, 2010, the Company filed an Amended Answer with counterclaims against Guccione and Penthouse Publications Limited for conversion, breach of fiduciary duty, declaratory relief and indemnification. No specific amount of damages has been requested in the counterclaims. On January 27, 2010, Plaintiffs filed a Reply to the Company’s counterclaims. In January and February 2010, certain defendants filed Answers to Plaintiffs’ Second Amended Complaint with cross-claims against the Company for contribution and indemnification. No specific amount of damages has been requested. In February

F-21

FRIENDFINDER NETWORKS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)

16. CONTINGENCIES (Continued)

and March 2010, the Company filed its Answer and Affirmative Defenses to the cross-claims. On October 20, 2010, Guccione passed away. As such, the case is stayed pending substitution of his estate as a party. On November 1,2011, the Court substituted the personal representative of the Estate of Robert Guccione as the Plaintiff in this matter and set a status conference for November 14, 2011. The Company believes it has meritorious defenses to all claims and intends to vigorously defend the lawsuit.

(c)

On or about November 27, 2006, a claimant filed a consumer class action arbitration at Judicial Arbitration and Mediation Services, Inc. or JAMS in San Jose, California, alleging a nationwide class action against Various under a variety of legal theories related to, among other things, representations regarding the number of active users on its internet dating websites, causing the appearance of erroneous member profiles, and a failure to adequately remove or account for alleged erroneous member profiles. The claimant is seeking unspecified damages. Various disputes the claims and intends to defend the arbitration vigorously.

(d)

On November 28, 2006, Antor Media Corporation (“Antor”) filed a complaint against FriendFinder, its subsidiary, General Media Communications, Inc. (“GMCI”), and several non-affiliate media/entertainment defendants in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Texarkana Division, for infringement of a Patent titled “Method and Apparatus for Transmitting Information Recorded on Information Storage Means from a Central Server to Subscribers via a High Data Rate Digital Telecommunications Network.” No specific amount of damages has been requested. Injunctive relief is also sought. The Company and its subsidiary filed an Answer, Affirmative Defenses and Counterclaims. The United States Patent and Trademark Office (“USPTO”) issued a non-final office action rejecting Antor’s patent claims. Antor filed a response to the office action which added 83 new claims to the original 29 rejected claims. In August 2008, the USPTO issued its final office action sustaining its rejection of the original 29 claims and rejecting the 83 new claims. Antor filed its Petition to Vacate Finality of Office Action on the grounds it introduced new grounds for the rejection. Based on the final office action, the Company, GMCI and all other defendants filed an expedited motion to stay the case. In December 2008, pursuant to an order granting a re-examination proceeding, the USPTO issued a non-final office action again rejecting the original 29 claims and the new 83 claims. In February 2009, Antor filed a response in which it agreed to cancel the 83 new claims previously proposed. On May 11, 2009, the Court entered an Order granting Defendants’ Motion to Stay as modified. On May 22, 2009, the defendant accepted the terms of the Court’s proposed Stipulation regarding the use of prior art at trial and filed their Stipulation. On June 5, 2009, the USPTO issued a Final Office Action rejecting all of the Plaintiff’s claims. Plaintiff filed an appeal on July 7, 2009 and an appellate brief on October 8, 2009. On February 18, 2010, the USPTO filed an answer brief. On October 21, 2010, the USPTO Board of Patent Appeals entered an order affirming the rejection of Antor’s claims. On December 21, 2010, Antor filed a request for rehearing which was denied in March 2011. On May 23, 2011, Antor filed its notice of appeal. On September 28, 2011, Antor filed its appeal brief. The case will remain stayed pending the appeal.

(e)

Effective July 1, 2008, Various registered in the European Union and on July 29, 2008, began separately charging VAT to its customers. For periods prior thereto, Various recorded a liability for VAT and related interest and penalties in connection with revenue from internet services derived from its customers in the various European Union countries. Various reduced its VAT liability for periods prior to July 1, 2008 in the countries where the liability was either paid in full or payments were made pursuant to settlement and payment plans or where determinations were made that payments were not due. Various continues to negotiate settlements of the liabilities or challenge the liability related to VAT for periods prior to July 1, 2008 (see Note 8).

(f)

On May 19, 2009, representatives for Summit Trading Limited (“Summit”) sent a letter to the Company’s outside legal counsel, alleging that the Company, Interactive Brand Development, Inc., (an owner of the Company’s Series B Common Stock) and entities affiliated with two of the Company’s principal stockholders defrauded Summit of financial compensation for services provided to the Company’s predecessor entity, General Media, Inc. Among the claims, Summit asserted bad faith, breach of contract and fraud by the Company’s management and the Company, and claimed that it is owed an equity interest in the Company,

F-22

FRIENDFINDER NETWORKS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)

16. CONTINGENCIES (Continued)

as well as compensatory, punitive and exemplary damages in excess of $500 million. Management believes that the allegations stated in the letter are vague and lack factual basis and merit. Summit has not taken any legal action against the Company. Should Summit take legal action, the Company would vigorously defend the lawsuit.

(g)

On November 16, 2010, Patent Harbor, LLC filed a Complaint for patent infringement against, among others, Penthouse Digital Media Productions Inc. (PDMP), in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas. The Complaint alleges an infringement of a U.S. Patent titled “Apparatus and Method for Assembling Content Addressable Video” (“Licensed Patent”). No specific amount of damages has been requested. However, on November 16, 2010, the Company received a settlement demand from plaintiff in the amount of $800,000. Plaintiff later lowered its demand to $500,000 and on July 11, 2011, the Company received a settlement demand from Plaintiff in the amount of $82,500. On January 28, 2011, the Company filed an Answer, Affirmative Defenses and Counterclaims. On February 25, 2011, Plaintiff filed its Answer to the Counterclaims. On July 27, 2011, the Company filed its Amended Answer, Affirmative Defenses and Amended Counterclaims. On August 10, 2011, Plaintiffs filed its Answer to the Amended Counterclaim. On November 3, 2011, the parties entered into a settlement agreement whereby the Company agreed to pay Patent Harbor, LLC a total of $80,000 in three payments. The first payment will be made on or before November 15, 2011 in the amount of $40,000, the second payment will be made on or before December 15, 2011 in the amount of $20,000 and the third and final payment will be made on or before January 17, 2012 in the amount of $20,000. In exchange for the payment, the litigation will be dismissed and the Company will receive a license from Patent Harbor, LLC for use of the Licensed Patent.

(h)

On April 13, 2011, Facebook, Inc., or Facebook, filed a complaint against FriendFinder and certain of its subsidiaries in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, alleging trademark infringement with regard to the use of the terms “facebook of sex” and Facebook’s use of the “FRIENDFINDER” mark. The Complaint contains causes of action for: trademark dilution, false designation of origin, trademark infringement, violation of the Anti-Cybersquating Consumer Protection Act, and for unfair competition. The Complaint also seeks a declaratory judgment that Facebook’s use of “friend finder” is a descriptive fair use that does not infringe Various’ trademark rights in the “FRIENDFINDER” mark. No specific amount of damages has been sought. However, the Complaint requests monetary relief, injunctive relief, punitive damages, cancellation of the “FRIENDFINDER” marks, attorneys’ fees, other equitable relief, and costs amongst other things. On May 23, 2011, the Company, and its subsidiaries, filed their Answer, Affirmative Defenses and Counterclaims to the Complaint. On June 16, 2011, Facebook filed its Answer and Affirmative Defenses to the Counterclaims. The Company believes that it has meritorious defenses to the claims asserted and intends to vigorously defend this lawsuit and prosecute the Counterclaims against Facebook. A settlement conference was held on November 4, 2011. The parties are currently in the process of negotiating a final settlement agreement. On November 7, 2011, the Court approved the Joint Stipulation for Stay and all deadlines in the litigation are stayed pending the negotiation of the final settlement agreement. Any payment made by the Company as a result of the settlement agreement is not expected to be material.

(i)

On November 11, 2011, a putative shareholder class action was filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida by Greenfield Childrens Partnership, on behalf of investors who purchased the Company’s common stock pursuant to the Company’s initial public offering, against the Company, Ladenburg Thalmann & Co., Inc. and Imperial Capital LLC, the underwriters in the Company’s initial public offering, and the Company’s directors and certain of the Company’s executive officers. The complaint alleges, among other things, that the Company’s initial public offering documents contained certain of the Company’s false and misleading statements and seeks an unspecified amount of compensatory damages. The Company believes that it has meritorious defenses to all claims and intend to vigorously defend the lawsuit.

F-23

FRIENDFINDER NETWORKS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)

16. CONTINGENCIES (Continued)

aggregate, will not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial position, cash flows, or overall trends in results of operations, litigation and arbitration is subject to inherent uncertainties and unfavorable rulings could occur. An unfavorable ruling could include monetary damages or, in cases for which injunctive relief is sought, an injunction prohibiting the Company from selling one or more products or services. Were an unfavorable ruling to occur, there exists the possibility of a material adverse impact on the business or results of operations for the period in which the ruling occurs or future periods.

Other than as disclosed above, the Company is unable to estimate the possible loss or range of loss which may result from pending legal proceedings or claims.

F-24

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

The Board of Directors and Stockholders
FriendFinder Networks Inc.

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of FriendFinder Networks Inc. and subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2010 and 2009, and the related consolidated statements of operations, changes in redeemable preferred stock and stockholders’ deficiency, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2010. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of FriendFinder Networks Inc. and subsidiaries at December 31, 2010 and 2009 and the consolidated results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2010, in conformity with United States generally accepted accounting principles.

/s/ EisnerAmper LLP

New York, New York
March 15, 2011, except for Notes Q(l) and T and the last paragraph of Note Q(a) as to which the dates are April 13, 2011, May 19, 2011, and July 6, 2011, respectively

F-25

FRIENDFINDER NETWORKS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT SHARE AND PER SHARE AMOUNTS)

	December 31,
	2010			2009
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash	$	34,585		$	22,600
Restricted cash		7,385			6,295
Accounts receivable, less allowance for doubtful accounts of $2,236 and $2,152, respectively		9,886			12,142
Inventories		1,028			1,339
Prepaid expenses		4,534			7,980
Deferred tax asset		5,522			11,366
Total current assets		62,940			61,722
Film costs, net		4,312			4,526
Property and equipment, net		6,666			13,812
Goodwill		326,540			326,540
Domain names		55,890			55,491
Trademarks		9,213			13,873
Other intangible assets, net		29,134			48,183
Deferred debt costs, net		22,336			12,318
Deferred offering costs		13,267			9,050
Receivable from escrow fund		—			2,679
Other assets		2,519			3,687
	$	532,817		$	551,881
LIABILITIES
Current liabilities:
Current installment of long-term debt, net of unamortized discount of $744 and $1,931, respectively		15,009			56,116
Accounts payable		9,481			12,612
Accrued expenses and other liabilities		65,420			69,727
Deferred revenue		48,302			46,046
Total current liabilities		138,212			184,501
Deferred tax liability		30,275			37,397
Long-term debt, net of unamortized discount of $31,935 and $44,118, respectively		510,551			432,028
Liability related to warrants		3,559			3,597
Total liabilities		682,597			657,523
Commitments and contingencies (Notes P and Q)
REDEEMABLE PREFERRED STOCK
Series A Convertible Preferred Stock, $0.001 per share — authorized 2,500,000 shares; issued and outstanding 1,766,703 shares in 2009 (at liquidation preference)		—			21,000
Series B Convertible Preferred Stock, $0.001 per share — authorized 10,000,000 shares; issued and outstanding 8,444,853 shares in 2009 (at liquidation preference)		—			5,000
STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIENCY
Preferred stock, $0.001 par value — authorized 22,500,000 shares; issued and outstanding 10,211,556 shares in 2010 and redeemable shares in 2009, shown above
Series A Convertible Preferred Stock $0.001 per share — authorized 2,500,000 shares; issued and outstanding 1,766,703 shares in 2010 (liquidation preference $21,000)		2			—
Series B Convertible Preferred Stock $0.001 per share — authorized 10,000,000 shares; issued and outstanding 8,444,853 shares in 2010 (liquidation preference $5,000)		8			—
Common stock, $0.001 par value — authorized 125,000,000 shares in 2010 and 2009
Common stock voting — authorized 112,500,000 shares, issued and outstanding 6,517,746 in 2010 and 2009.		6			6
Series B common stock non-voting — authorized 12,500,000 shares; issued and outstanding 1,839,825 shares in 2010 and 2009		2			2
Capital in excess of par value		80,823			55,818
Accumulated deficit		(230,621	)		(187,468	)
Total stockholders’ deficiency		(149,780	)		(131,642	)
	$	532,817		$	551,881

See notes to consolidated financial statements

F-26

FRIENDFINDER NETWORKS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE AMOUNTS)

	Year Ended December 31,
	2010			2009			2008
Net revenue
Service	$	324,211		$	309,033		$	309,388
Product		21,786			18,659			21,629
Total		345,997			327,692			331,017
Cost of revenue
Service		97,959			78,627			81,815
Product		12,531			13,070			14,699
Total		110,490			91,697			96,514
Gross profit		235,507			235,995			234,503
Operating expenses:
Product development		12,834			13,500			14,553
Selling and marketing		37,258			42,902			59,281
General and administrative		79,855			76,863			88,280
Amortization of acquired intangibles and software		24,461			35,454			36,347
Depreciation and other amortization		4,704			4,881			4,502
Impairment of goodwill		—			—			9,571
Impairment of other intangible assets		4,660			4,000			14,860
Total operating expenses		163,772			177,600			227,394
Income from operations		71,735			58,395			7,109
Interest expense, net of interest income		(88,508	)		(92,139	)		(80,510	)
Other finance expenses		(4,562	)		—			—
Interest and penalties related to VAT liability not charged to customers		(2,293	)		(4,205	)		(8,429	)
Net loss on extinguishment and modification of debt		(7,457	)		(7,240	)		—
Foreign exchange gain (loss), principally related to VAT liability not charged to customers		610			(5,530	)		15,195
Gain on settlement of VAT liability not charged to customers		—			232			2,690
Gain on elimination of liability for United Kingdom VAT not charged to customers		—			1,561			—
Gain on liability related to warrants		38			2,744			—
Other non-operating expenses, net		(13,202	)		(366	)		(197	)
Loss before income tax benefit		(43,639	)		(46,548	)		(64,142	)
Income tax benefit		(486	)		(5,332	)		(18,176	)
Net loss	$	(43,153	)	$	(41,216	)	$	(45,966	)
Net loss per common share — basic and diluted	$	(3.14	)	$	(3.00	)	$	(3.35	)
Weighted average shares outstanding — basic and diluted		13,735			13,735			13,735

See notes to consolidated financial statements

F-27

FRIENDFINDER NETWORKS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN REDEEMABLE PREFERRED STOCK AND
STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIENCY
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008
(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT SHARE DATA)

	Redeemable Preferred Stock												Stockholders’ Deficiency
	Series A Convertible						Series B Convertible						Preferred Stock				Common Stock
																	Voting				Series B Non-Voting
	Shares			Amount			Shares			Amount			Shares		Amount		Shares		Amount		Shares		Amount		Capital in Excess of Par Value			Accumulated Deficit			Total
Balance at January 1, 2008		1,766,703		$	21,000			8,444,853		$	5,000			0	$	0		3,561,127	$	4		1,839,825	$	2	$	60,576		$	(98,701	)	$	(38,119	)
Exercise of warrants																		1,686,700		1						(1	)
Net loss																													(45,966	)		(45,966	)
Balance at December 31, 2008		1,766,703			21,000			8,444,853			5,000			0		0		5,247,827		5		1,839,825		2		60,575			(144,667	)		(84,085	)
Classification of warrants as a liability																										(4,756	)		(1,585	)		(6,341	)
Exercise of warrants																		1,269,919		1						(1	)
Net loss																													(41,216	)		(41,216	)
Balance at December 31, 2009		1,766,703			21,000			8,444,853			5,000			0		0		6,517,746		6		1,839,825		2		55,818			(187,468	)		(131,642	)
Transfer of preferred stock from temporary equity to stockholders’ deficiency		(1,766,703	)		(21,000	)		(8,444,853	)		(5,000	)		10,211,556		10										25,990						26,000
Other																										(985	)					(985	)
Net loss																													(43,153	)		(43,153	)
Balance at December 31, 2010		0		$	0			0		$	0			10,211,556	$	10		6,517,746	$	6		1,839,825	$	2	$	80,823		$	(230,621	)	$	(149,780	)

See notes to consolidated financial statements

F-28

FRIENDFINDER NETWORKS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(IN THOUSANDS)

	Year Ended December 31,
	2010			2009			2008
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net loss	$	(43,153	)	$	(41,216	)	$	(45,966	)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by operating activities:
Deferred income tax benefit		(1,278	)		(5,332	)		(18,550	)
Impairment of intangibles		4,660			4,000			24,431
Net loss on extinguishment and modification of debt		7,457			7,240			—
Amortization of acquired intangibles and software		24,461			35,454			36,347
Depreciation and other amortization		4,702			4,881			4,502
Amortization of film costs		3,763			4,001			3,899
Non-cash interest, including amortization of discount		45,148			47,139			30,725
Provision for doubtful accounts		839			249			1,505
Gain on elimination of liability for United Kingdom VAT not charged to customers		—			(1,561	)		—
Gain on settlement of VAT liability not charged to customers		—			(232	)		(2,690	)
Gain on warrant liability		(38	)		(2,744	)		—
Other		504			209			32
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Restricted cash		(1,090	)		1,566			8,480
Accounts receivable		1,417			(3,050	)		5,101
Inventories		311			288			88
Prepaid expenses		3,446			(1,652	)		(2,820	)
Film costs		(3,549	)		(3,705	)		(4,461	)
Deferred debt costs		(4,265	)		(5,594	)		—
Deferred offering costs		(4,217	)		(6,974	)		(2,076	)
Other assets		1,169			(1,133	)		(864	)
Accounts payable		(3,132	)		3,579			(2,775	)
Accrued expenses and other liabilities		3,230			1,034			440
Deferred revenue		2,255			3,232			15,600
Net cash provided by operating activities		42,640			39,679			50,948
Cash flows from investing activities:
Cash received from escrow in connection with acquisition		2,679			7,321			—
Purchases of property and equipment		(3,530	)		(3,542	)		(9,161	)
Reduction of goodwill attributable to reimbursement from prior owners of Various		—			915			—
Other		(399	)		(490	)		(128	)
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities		(1,250	)		4,204			(9,289	)
Cash flows from financing activities:
Debt issuance costs		(5,834	)		—			—
Repayment of long-term debt		(25,921	)		(44,987	)		(25,336	)
Redemption of long-term debt		(86,237	)		—			—
Issuance of New First and Second Lien Notes		89,572			—			—
Other		(985	)		—			—
Net cash (used in) financing activities		(29,405	)		(44,987	)		(25,336	)
Net increase (decrease) in cash		11,985			(1,104	)		16,323
Cash at beginning of period		22,600			23,704			7,381
Cash at end of period	$	34,585		$	22,600		$	23,704

See notes to consolidated financial statements

F-29

FRIENDFINDER NETWORKS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(IN THOUSANDS)

	Year Ended December 31,
	2010		2009		2008
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information:
Cash paid for:
Interest paid	$	43,541	$	45,531	$	53,592
Income taxes		—		1,343		17
Non-cash investing and financing activities:
Reduction of Subordinated Convertible Notes and goodwill for bonus indemnification from former stockholders of Various		—	$	1,202	$	1,074
Accrual and issuance of notes for debt modification costs		—	$	6,041		—
Effect of elimination of United Kingdom VAT liability:
Reduction in accrued expenses and other liabilities		—	$	39,520		—
Increase in Subordinated Convertible Notes payable		—	$	28,989		—
Reduction of goodwill		—	$	5,381		—
Increase in deferred tax liability		—	$	3,587		—
Exchange of New First Lien Notes for outstanding First ($126,124) and Second ($48,275) Lien Notes	$	174,399		—		—
Issuance of New First Lien Notes for commitment fees	$	13,146		—		—
Exchange of New First Lien Notes and Cash Pay Second Lien Notes for Senior Secured Notes	$	28,053		—		—
Exchange of Non-Cash Pay Second Lien Notes for outstanding Subordinated Convertible Notes ($161,560) plus $3,514 of accrued interest	$	165,074		—		—
Exchange of Non-Cash Pay Second Lien Notes for $42,811 of Subordinated Term Notes plus $5,949 of accrued interest	$	45,726		—		—

See notes to consolidated financial statements

F-30

FRIENDFINDER NETWORKS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE A — DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS

On July 1, 2008, Penthouse Media Group Inc. changed its name to FriendFinder Networks Inc. (“FriendFinder”). FriendFinder together with its subsidiaries (hereinafter referred to as the “Company”) is an international social networking and multimedia entertainment company that operates social networking, live interactive video and premium content adult websites and is also engaged in entertainment activities consisting of publishing, licensing and studio production and distribution. The Company publishes PENTHOUSE and other adult-oriented magazines and digests. Additionally, the Company licenses the PENTHOUSE name for international publication of adult magazines and for use on various products and provides various adult-oriented multimedia entertainment products and services, including content for DVD, pay-per-view programming and telephone services.

NOTE B — LIQUIDITY

Subsequent to the acquisition, the Company has been attempting to raise funds through the sale of common stock in an IPO and use the net proceeds to repay its debt which was scheduled to mature in 2010 and 2011. In February 2010, due to market conditions, the Company suspended the offering. In July 2010, the maturity date of $46.3 million of outstanding Senior Secured Notes payable by FriendFinder scheduled to mature on July 31, 2010 was extended to January 1, 2011. On October 27, 2010, the Company completed a debt restructuring which consolidated substantially all of its debt into three tranches with maturities in 2013 and 2014 (see Note J). In May 2011, the Company completed its IPO (see Note T).

NOTE C — SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Principles of consolidation:

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of FriendFinder and its subsidiaries, all of which are wholly owned. Intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

Stock splits:

On January 25, 2010, the Company effected 1-for-20 reverse splits of each class and series of the Company’s authorized capital stock, including all designated classes and series of common and preferred stock, and a corresponding and proportionate decrease in the number of outstanding shares of each such class and series. In addition, following the effectiveness of the reverse stock splits, the Company’s articles of incorporation were amended and restated on January 25, 2010 to reflect a total of 125 million shares of authorized common stock and 22.5 million shares of authorized preferred stock and a change in the par value of such shares from $0.01 par value to $0.001 par value. Retroactive effect has been given to the change in authorized shares and split in the accompanying financial statements and notes and all share and per share amounts have been adjusted to reflect the reverse stock splits.

Use of estimates:

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

F-31

FRIENDFINDER NETWORKS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE C — SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)

Cash and cash equivalents:

Cash and cash equivalents include all cash balances and highly liquid investments having original maturities of three months or less when purchased. As of December 31, 2010 and 2009, there were no cash equivalents.

Restricted cash:

The credit card processors used by Various regularly withhold deposits and maintain balances which are recorded as restricted cash.

Accounts receivable:

Accounts receivable is principally comprised of credit card payments owed to Various for membership fees, which are pending collection from the credit card processors. An allowance for doubtful accounts is estimated based on past experience. In addition, an estimated liability is recorded by Various based on historical trends of chargeback levels from credit card processing banks and credits from customers for disputed charges. The chargeback and credit liability as of December 31, 2010 and 2009, which is included in accrued expenses and other liabilities, was approximately $1,137,000 and $860,000, respectively. Chargebacks and credits charged to revenue for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008 were approximately $21,872,000, $15,988,000 and $11,916,000, respectively.

Inventories:

Inventories, which consist principally of paper and printing costs, are valued at the lower of cost (first-in, first-out method) or market.

Property and equipment:

Property and equipment are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation and amortization. Depreciation and amortization are computed using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the related assets. Computer hardware and software are depreciated over three years and leasehold improvements are amortized over the shorter of the life of the lease or the estimated useful life of the improvements.

Software costs:

Costs related to developing or obtaining internal-use software incurred during the preliminary project and post-implementation stages of an internal use software project are expensed as incurred and certain costs incurred in the project’s application development stage are capitalized as property and equipment.

The Company expenses costs related to the planning and operating stages of a website. Direct costs incurred in the website’s development stage are capitalized. Costs associated with minor enhancements and maintenance for the website are included in expenses as incurred.

10.

Film costs:

Film costs consist of direct costs of production of adult entertainment video content. Such costs are being amortized using the straight-line method over thirty-six months, which represents the estimated period during which substantially all revenue from the content will be realized. Film cost amortization is included in cost of revenue.

11.

Goodwill, trademarks and other intangibles:

Goodwill and trademarks, which are deemed to have an indefinite useful life, were recorded in connection with the adoption of fresh start reporting upon the Company’s emergence from bankruptcy proceedings. Additionally, goodwill was recorded in connection with the acquisition of Various and other business

F-32

FRIENDFINDER NETWORKS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE C — SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)

combinations, representing the excess of the purchase price over the fair value of the identifiable net assets acquired. These assets, together with domain names that were recorded in the Various acquisition and were also deemed to have an indefinite useful life based primarily on the Company’s plans for continued indefinite use, are not amortized, but are tested for impairment annually or more frequently if events or changes in circumstances indicate that the asset might be impaired. The impairment test for indefinite-lived trademarks and domain names consists of a comparison of their fair value with their carrying amount. See Notes G and H with respect to impairment of goodwill and trademarks, respectively.

Other intangible assets are deemed to have finite useful lives and are amortized over periods ranging from two to five years. The Company evaluates the recoverability of such assets by comparing their carrying amount to the expected future undiscounted cash flows to be generated from such assets when events or circumstances indicate that impairment may have occurred. If the carrying amount exceeds such cash flow, an impairment loss would be recognized to the extent such carrying amount exceeds the fair value of the impaired assets based upon their discounted future cash flows.

12.

Deferred debt costs:

Debt issuance costs and waiver, amendment and commitment fees paid to debt holders are deferred and amortized by the effective interest method over the remaining term of the related debt instrument. Approximately $13.2 million of such costs and fees were written off when the Company completed a debt restructuring in 2010 of which $8.6 million was included in loss on extinguishment of debt and $4.6 million was classified as other finance expenses (see Note J). Accumulated amortization amounted to approximately $10.0 million and $2.7 million at December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively.

13.

Deferred offering costs:

Incremental costs incurred in connection with an IPO of the Company’s common stock filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) are classified as deferred offering costs in the consolidated balance sheets. In February 2010, the IPO was suspended. If the offering is completed, the deferred costs will be offset against the proceeds of the offering and charged to capital in excess of par value. If the offering is aborted, the deferred costs will be charged to operations.

14.

Revenue recognition:

Internet:

Revenues from subscription fees are recognized ratably over the subscription period, including anticipated free promotional periods for which no additional amounts are charged, beginning when there is persuasive evidence of an arrangement, delivery has occurred (access has been granted) and the fees are fixed and determinable. Collection is reasonably assured as subscribers pay in advance, primarily by using a credit card, and all purchases are final and nonrefundable. Free promotional periods are earned based on the level of a subscribers monthly activity, are dependant to the length and level of the subscription, and range from one to six months. Fees collected in advance are deferred and recognized as revenue using the straight-line method over the term of the subscription, which ranges from one to eighteen months.

Revenues on a pay-by-usage basis are recognized when access has been granted. Revenues for banner advertising on websites are recognized ratably over the period that the advertising appears. Commission revenue from the shipment of products (i.e., adult novelty items and videos) from online stores, which are operated by a third party, are recognized upon receipt of notification of the commission owed the Company from the online store operator.

F-33

FRIENDFINDER NETWORKS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE C — SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)

The Company estimates the amount of chargebacks that will occur in future periods to offset current revenue. The Company’s revenue is primarily collected through online credit card transactions. As such, the Company is subject to chargebacks by consumers generally up to 90 days subsequent to the original sale date. The Company accrues chargebacks based on historical trends relative to sales levels by website.

Entertainment:

Revenues from the sale of magazines at newsstands are recognized on the on-sale date of each issue based on an estimate of the total sale through, net of estimated returns. The amount of estimated revenue is adjusted in subsequent periods as sales and returns information becomes available. Revenues from the sale of magazine subscriptions are recognized ratably over their respective terms which range from one to two years. The unrecognized portion of magazine subscriptions is shown as deferred revenue. Revenues from advertising in magazines are recognized on the on-sale date of each issue in which the advertising is included.

For agreements that involve the distribution of video content, revenue is recognized upon notification from the customer of amounts due. For agreements that provide for a flat fee payable with respect to multiple films (including films not yet produced or completed) the fees are allocated based on the relative fair values of the films with the fees allocated to films not yet completed based on the amount refundable to the customer should the Company not ultimately complete and deliver the films.

Revenues from the licensing of the PENTHOUSE name for use (i) in the publication of magazines in foreign countries and the sale of consumer products are recognized in the period of sale as reported by the licensee and (ii) in connection with licensed nightclubs are recognized ratably over the term of the license agreement for up-front payments and in the period of sale as reported by the licensee on food, beverages and other sales.

15.

Cost of revenue:

Cost of service revenue includes commissions paid to websites having direct links to the Company’s websites resulting in new subscribers, costs for online models and studios and amortization of capitalized website development costs.

Cost of product revenue includes the costs of printing and distributing of magazines and amortization of production costs of videos containing adult entertainment content. Shipping and handling costs are also included and amounted to approximately $2,105,000, $2,538,000 and $3,256,000 for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively.

16.

Product development:

Costs related to the planning and post-implementation stages of the Company’s website development efforts are recorded as product development expense. Direct costs incurred in the development stage are capitalized and amortized over the website’s estimated useful life of three years as charges to cost of service revenue.

17.

Advertising:

Advertising costs are expensed as incurred. For the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008, the Company incurred advertising costs, included in selling and marketing expense, amounting to approximately $32,301,000, $36,794,000 and $52,619,000, respectively. Costs consist principally of payments to internet search engines for key words searches to generate traffic to the Company’s websites.

F-34

FRIENDFINDER NETWORKS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE C — SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)

18.

Loyalty program:

The Company operates a point-based loyalty program designed to increase participation in its assorted membership activities. These points are earned through activities such as, but not limited to, participating in sponsored blogs and online magazines, as well as by increasing the uniqueness of a member profile through the addition of photographs and other assorted items. Points may be redeemed for other membership services such as upgraded memberships or highlighting of member profiles in online searches. As the incremental cost of providing these additional membership services is minimal, no liabilities are recorded in connection with point redemptions.

19.

Stock-based compensation:

Cost of stock-based compensation arrangements, including stock options, is measured based on the fair value of the equity instrument issued at the date of grant and is expensed over the vesting period.

20.

Income taxes:

The Company recognizes deferred tax assets and liabilities for the expected future tax consequences of events that have been included in the financial statements or tax returns. Under this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are recorded for net operating loss carryforwards and for the difference between the tax bases of assets and liabilities and their respective financial reporting amounts at enacted tax rates in effect for the years in which the temporary differences are expected to reverse. A valuation allowance is recorded if it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized in future periods.

21.

Value added taxes:

Value added taxes (“VAT”) are presented on a net basis and are excluded from revenue.

22.

Foreign currency transactions:

Revenue derived from international websites is paid in advance primarily with credit cards and is denominated in local currencies. Substantially all such currencies are converted into U.S. dollars on the dates of the transactions at rates of exchange in effect on such dates and remitted to the Company. Accordingly, foreign currency revenue is recorded based on the U.S. dollars received by the Company. Accounts receivable due from, and restricted cash held by, foreign credit card processors, certain cash balances and VAT liabilities denominated in foreign currencies are translated into U.S. dollars using current exchange rates in effect as of the balance sheet date. Gains and losses resulting from transactions denominated in foreign currencies are recorded in the statements of operations.

23.

Concentration of credit risk:

The Company’s cash and accounts receivable are potentially subject to concentrations of credit risk. Cash is placed with financial institutions that management believes are of high credit quality. The Company’s accounts receivable are derived from revenue earned from customers located in the U.S. and internationally. At December 31, 2010 and 2009, accounts receivable balances are due principally from credit card processors and are settled upon processing of credit card transactions. As of December 31, 2010, two credit card processors accounted for 28% and 21% of accounts receivable and, as of December 31, 2009, two credit card processors accounted for 38%, and 11% of accounts receivable. During the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008, no customer accounted for more than 10% of net revenue.

24.

Fair value of financial instruments:

F-35

FRIENDFINDER NETWORKS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE C — SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)

on unobservable inputs (see Note K). As of December 31, 2010, the carrying value of long-term debt was $525,560,000 compared to its estimated fair value of $550,082,000. As of December 31, 2009, the carrying amount of long-term debt was $488,144,000 compared to its estimated fair value of $420,638,000. The fair value is estimated by discounting the projected cash flows using the estimated rates at which similar amounts of debt could be borrowed at such date and through third party pricing information.

25.

Per share data:

Weighted average shares outstanding — basic and diluted is comprised of the following (in thousands):

	Year Ended December 31,
	2010		2009		2008
Common stock		6,518		6,518		5,248
Series B common stock		1,840		1,840		1,840
Common stock purchase warrants		5,377		5,377		6,647
		13,735		13,735		13,735

In computing diluted loss per share, no effect has been given to the common shares issuable upon conversion or exercise of the following anti-dilutive securities (in thousands):

	Year Ended December 31,
	2010		2009		2008
Series A Convertible Preferred Stock		2,000		2,000		2,000
Series B Convertible Preferred Stock		8,445		8,445		8,445
Warrants		502		502		502
Total common shares issuable		10,947		10,947		10,947

The Series A and Series B preferred stock are convertible participating securities; however, as there is no contractual obligation for the holders of such shares to share in the losses of the Company, the preferred shares are not included in the computation of basic and diluted net loss per share.

No shares are included in the above table with respect to the conversion of Non-Cash Pay Second Lien Notes in 2010 and Subordinated Convertible Notes in 2009 and 2008 as the number of common shares into which the notes are or were convertible is based upon an IPO price which is not presently determinable. In addition, no shares are included in the above table with respect to agreements to grant options to acquire 552,000 and 647,000 shares of common stock outstanding at December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively, under the 2008 Stock Option Plan as, for accounting purposes, the grant date will occur upon consummation of an IPO (see Note M).

26.

Reclassifications

Certain reclassifications have been made to prior year amounts to conform to the 2010 presentation.

F-36

FRIENDFINDER NETWORKS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE D — INVENTORY

The components of inventory were as follows (in thousands):

	December 31,
	2010		2009
Paper and printing costs	$	693	$	804
Editorials and pictorials		335		535
	$	1,028	$	1,339

NOTE E — FILM COSTS

Film costs activity consists of the following (in thousands):

	Year Ended December 31,
	2010			2009			2008
Opening balance	$	4,526		$	4,822		$	4,260
Content produced		3,549			3,705			4,461
Amortization		(3,763	)		(4,001	)		(3,899	)
Ending balance	$	4,312		$	4,526		$	4,822

Substantially all of the capitalized film costs at December 31, 2010 and 2009 represent completed and released content. Management estimates that amortization charges for the completed and released content, as of December 31, 2010, will be $2,472,000, $1,410,000 and $366,000 for the years ending December 31, 2011, 2012, and 2013, respectively.

NOTE F — PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT

Property and equipment consists of the following (in thousands):

	December 31,
	2010		2009
Property and equipment:
Leasehold improvements	$	1,004	$	757
Computer hardware and software		39,318		36,035
		40,322		36,792
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization		33,656		22,980
	$	6,666	$	13,812

Depreciation and amortization expense amounted to approximately $10,113,000, $10,922,000 and $10,255,000 for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively. Computer hardware and software above includes $17.3 million that relates to the acquisition of Various in December 2007. Amortization expense of the acquired software amounted to approximately $5,379,000, $5,767,000 and $5,767,000 for each of the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009, and 2008, respectively, and is included in amortization of acquired intangibles and software in the accompanying statements of operations.

F-37

FRIENDFINDER NETWORKS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE G — GOODWILL

There were no changes in the carrying amount of goodwill in 2010. Changes in the carrying amount of goodwill by segment for the year ended December 31, 2009 are as follows (in thousands):

	Internet			Entertainment		Total
Balance as of December 31, 2008	$	334,037		$	—	$	334,037
Reduction for elimination of VAT liability (see Note J(f))		(5,380	)				(5,380	)
Reduction for reimbursement from sellers of Various		(915	)		—		(915	)
Reduction for indemnification from sellers of Various (see Note J(f))		(1,202	)		—		(1,202	)
Balance as of December 31, 2009 and 2010	$	326,540		$	—	$	326,540

In 2009, a former owner of Various, pursuant to a claim for indemnification provided for by the terms of the Various acquisition agreement, paid the Company approximately $3.5 million as reimbursement of a portion of amounts paid by Various, including related legal fees, in connection with the settlement of litigation pending at the date of acquisition. Of such amount, approximately $2.5 million, related primarily to legal fees incurred by Various subsequent to the acquisition, was credited to general and administrative expenses and approximately $1 million, related to amounts accrued at the date of acquisition related to the litigation, was credited to goodwill.

Impairment of goodwill is required to be tested at least annually. Impairment is tested by comparing the fair values of the applicable reporting units with the carrying amount of their net assets, including goodwill. If the carrying amount of the reporting unit’s net assets exceeds the unit’s fair value, an impairment loss would be recognized in an amount equal to the excess of the carrying amount of goodwill over its implied fair value. The implied fair value of goodwill is determined in the same manner as the amount of goodwill recognized in a business combination with the fair value of the reporting unit deemed to be the purchase price paid.

In December 2010, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued new authoritative accounting guidance which provides that entities with reporting units with zero or negative carrying amounts are required to determine an implied fair value of goodwill if management concludes that it is more likely than not that a goodwill impairment exists considering any adverse qualitative factors. For public entities, the new guidance is effective for fiscal years and interim periods within those years beginning after December 15, 2010. Early adoption is not permitted. The Company will adopt this guidance effective January 1, 2011 and does not expect adoption to have any impact on its financial statements.

The fair value of each reporting unit was determined at December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008 by weighting a combination of the present value of the Company’s discounted anticipated future operating cash flows and values based on market multiples of revenue and earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (“EBITDA”) of comparable companies. Such valuations resulted in the Company recording a goodwill impairment loss of approximately $9.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2008, of which $6.8 million related to the Internet segment and $2.8 million related to the Entertainment segment. Such losses were attributable to downward revisions of earnings forecasted for future years and an increase in the discount rate due to operating results that were worse than anticipated.

The impairment charge with respect to the Internet segment was solely due to impairment in the online reporting unit of the Internet segment. The online reporting unit, launched in 1995, consists of branded websites, including Penthouse.com and Danni.com. It does not contain any of the assets acquired in the Various transaction, which are contained in the dating reporting unit and the Streamray reporting unit of the Internet segment. Due to a significant reduction in the Company’s forecasts of revenue and profitability for the online reporting unit, the fair value of the unit was determined to be less than its carrying value. Discounted anticipated future operating cash flows used to determine the fair value of the online reporting unit were based upon assumptions with respect to future growth and trends, discount rates and other variables. Key assumptions used were a discount rate of 16%,

F-38

FRIENDFINDER NETWORKS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE G — GOODWILL (Continued)

and an expected long-term growth rate of 3%. In addition, in calculating the implied fair value of goodwill, a royalty rate of 7% was derived from analysis of comparable companies in order to determine the value of trademarks utilized by the online reporting unit.

Management believes that the assumptions used in performing the impairment analysis are reasonable; however, they are inherently uncertain. A 1% change in any of the above three key assumptions could result in an impairment charge ranging from $6.2 million to $7.5 million.

NOTE H — INTANGIBLE ASSETS

Other intangible assets consist of the following (in thousands):

	December 31,
	2010				2009
	Gross Amount		Accumulated Amortization		Gross Amount		Accumulated Amortization		Estimated Useful Lives (Years)
Amortizable intangible assets:
Non-compete agreements	$	10,600	$	10,600	$	10,600	$	7,305		3
Customer lists		23,626		23,280		28,666		27,988		2–4
Service contracts		72,800		44,782		72,800		30,185		3–5
Studio contracts		3,300		2,530		3,300		1,705		4
Other		2,840		2,840		2,840		2,840		3
	$	113,166	$	84,032	$	118,206	$	70,023

For the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008, aggregate amortization expense amounted to $19,050,000, $29,690,000 and $30,581,000, respectively. Estimated future amortization expense is as follows: $15,612,000 (2011) and $13,522,000 (2012). Amortization of the acquired intangibles amounted to approximately $19,018,000, $29,661,000 and $30,581,000 for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively, and is included in amortization of acquired intangibles and software in the accompanying statements of operations.

Trademarks relate to publishing, licensing and studio operations which are included in the Entertainment segment. The Company recognized a trademark impairment loss of $4,660,000, $4,000,000 and $14,860,000 for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively. Such loss resulted due to the estimated fair value of the trademarks being less than their carrying value. The fair value of trademarks related to publishing is estimated based on an income approach using the relief-from-royalty method. This methodology assumes that, in lieu of ownership, a firm would be willing to pay a royalty in order to exploit the related benefits of these types of assets. This approach is dependent on a number of factors, including estimates of future growth and trends, royalty rates in the category of intellectual property, discount rates and other variables. The fair value of trademarks related to licensing is based on an income approach using the present value of discounted anticipated operating cash flows. The Company bases its fair value estimates on assumptions it believes to be reasonable, but which are unpredictable and inherently uncertain. The impairment of trademarks mainly resulted from declines in projected operating results and cash flows related to publishing and licensing.

F-39

FRIENDFINDER NETWORKS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE I — ACCRUED EXPENSES AND OTHER LIABILITIES

Accrued expenses and other liabilities consist of the following (in thousands):

	December 31,
	2010		2009
Accrued liability related to VAT	$	42,235	$	45,719
Chargeback reserve		1,137		860
Compensation and benefits		1,273		1,193
Accrued marketing		1,148		1,328
Legal and related expenses		510		1,055
Accrued interest		—		7,538
Accrued commissions to third party websites		3,147		2,774
Accrued waiver fees		—		2,613
Accrued loss related to claim in arbitration (see Note Q (a))		10,000		—
Other		5,970		6,647
	$	65,420	$	69,727

Effective July 1, 2003, as a result of a change in the law in the European Union, Various was required to collect VAT from customers in connection with their use of internet services in the European Union provided by Various and remit the VAT to the taxing authorities in the various European Union countries. As Various did not separately charge its customers for, or remit, the VAT, a liability has been recorded at the date of acquisition to reflect the estimated VAT which should have been collected and remitted on Various’ revenue derived from the various European Union countries since July 1, 2003 or other local implementation date. In addition, a liability has been recorded at the date of acquisition for interest and penalties related to the unremitted VAT and failure to file tax returns. Effective July 2008, the Company registered with the European Union and on July 29, 2008 began separately charging VAT to its customers. The aggregate liability included in accrued expenses and other liabilities, which is denominated in Euros, amounted to $42,235,000 and $45,719,000 at December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively, and includes VAT ($22,740,000 and $27,259,000), interest ($11,334,000 and $9,665,000) and penalties ($8,161,000 and $8,795,000). The consolidated statements of operations for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively, include foreign currency transaction gain (loss) of $2,913,000, ($5,075,000) and $15,195,000 related to the liability, and interest and, in 2008, penalties related to VAT of $2,293,000, $4,205,000 and $8,429,000. In addition, in 2008, VAT of $8,083,000 not separately charged to customers related to revenue earned during such year was offset against net revenue. As the allocation period to determine the fair value of the VAT obligation had ended, the 2008 results of operations included a $2,690,000 gain related to settlement of pre-acquisition VAT liability with certain of the European Union countries. As of December 31, 2010, the Company has reached settlement with the taxing authority of certain European Union countries related to VAT for periods prior to July 1, 2008 and has not yet reached settlement or has reached partial settlement, with the taxing authority in the following European Union countries: Cyprus, France, Germany, Italy, Luxembourg, Netherlands, Portugal, and Sweden. The liability as of December 31, 2010, includes $14,137,000 for which settlements of $5,305,000 were reached with certain countries and $2,842,000 related to current VAT charged to customers. Settlements have not been reached for the $25,231,000 balance of the VAT liability.

On June 10, 2009, the United Kingdom taxing authority notified the Company that it had reversed its previous position and that the Company was not subject to VAT in the United Kingdom in connection with providing internet services and therefore the corresponding VAT liability has been eliminated. On October 8, 2009, the Company subsequently released the former owners of Various from indemnity claims relating to VAT liabilities and other matters and increased the recorded principal balance of the Subordinated Convertible Notes issued to the former owners. Such increase included approximately $38 million, representing the principal reduction previously recorded as of the date of the acquisition for a post-closing working capital adjustment related to the United Kingdom VAT. The difference between such increase and the approximately $39.5 million balance related to United Kingdom VAT, including accrued interest and penalties, included in the accrued VAT liability at June 10, 2009 (exclusive of VAT charged to customers),

F-40

FRIENDFINDER NETWORKS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE I — ACCRUED EXPENSES AND OTHER LIABILITIES (Continued)

has been recorded as a gain in the amount of $1,561,000 in the consolidated statement of operations for the year ended December 31, 2009, and the liability balance has been eliminated.

On October 8, 2009, the Company further agreed that if the costs of eliminating the pre-acquisition VAT liabilities are less than $29 million, then the principal of the Subordinated Convertible Notes issued to the former owners of Various would be increased for the unused portion of the $29 million plus interest on such difference. Gain on settlement of VAT liabilities will be recognized upon the Company satisfying the conditions of the settlement and to the extent the aggregate carrying amount of settled VAT liabilities exceeds the agreed settlement amounts and the then potential maximum increase in the principal of the Subordinated Convertible Notes. As disclosed in Note J, in October 2010, the Convertible Subordinated Notes were exchanged for Non-Cash Pay Second Lien Notes and in connection therewith, the Company agreed that the principal increase would apply to the Non-Cash Pay Second Lien Notes.

Various had been previously notified that the German tax authorities and the Office of the District Attorney in Bonn had been investigating Various’ former Chief Executive Officer for alleged intentional evasion of VAT on revenue collected from customers located in Germany commencing in 2003. Various negotiated a settlement with the German authorities to drop criminal charges against a current officer by payment of approximately $2.6 million which represents a portion of the total amount of the uncollected German VAT liability. The settlement was paid in six equal monthly installments of approximately $430,000 commencing on April 1, 2009. In connection with the settlement the Company paid a fine of €25,000 to a charitable organization. On April 18, 2008, a court in Germany granted authorities a search and seizure order that allowed them to seize documents from Various’ office located in Germany in order to determine the amount of revenue subject to VAT. The German tax authority has attempted unsuccessfully to freeze assets in bank accounts maintained by subsidiaries of Various in Germany, but did freeze assets in the amount of €610,343, held by Various’ credit card processor located in the Netherlands to secure the VAT estimated by the revenue tax authorities to be due from Various from revenue from internet websites in Germany. At December 31, 2010 and 2009, the frozen Euros are included in restricted cash in the approximate amount of $818,000 and $875,000, respectively.

F-41

FRIENDFINDER NETWORKS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE J — LONG-TERM DEBT

Long-term debt consists of the following (in thousands):

	December 31,
	2010					2009
	Principal			Unamortized Discount		Principal			Unamortized Discount
Debt issued by FriendFinder and INI on October 27, 2010 (a):
First Lien Notes due 2011–2013, including principal of $112,020 ($108,154 net of discount) issued to Company’s stockholders (b)(e)	$	305,000		$	10,974		—			—
Cash Pay Second Lien Notes due 2013 issued to entities controlled by stockholders who are officers and directors (c)(e)		13,778			262		—			—
Non-Cash Pay Second Lien Notes, due 2014, including principal of $233,191 ($212,560 net of discount) issued to Company stockholders, including $45,310 ($41,302 net of discount) to entities controlled by certain officers and directors(d)(e)		237,211			20,986		—			—
Debt issued by INI in connection with the acquisition of Various:
New First Lien Notes due 2009–2011, including principal of $75,722 ($70,715 net of discount) issued to selling stockholders (f)		—			—	$	189,014		$	12,497
Second Lien Subordinated Secured Notes due 2011 issued to selling stockholders (f)		—			—		80,000			3,300
Subordinated Convertible Notes due 2011 issued to selling stockholders (g)		—			—		169,807			28,265
Other (h)		2,250			457		6,250			1,142
Senior Secured Notes of FriendFinder due 2010 (i)		—			—		46,311			845
Subordinated Term Notes of FriendFinder due 2011 (j)		—			—		42,811			—
	$	558,239		$	32,679	$	534,193		$	46,049

Less unamortized discount		(32,679	)				(46,049	)
Less current installment of long-term debt, net of unamortized discount of $744 and $1,931, respectively		(15,009	)				(56,116	)
	$	510,551				$	432,028

(a)

On October 27, 2010, $305,000,000 principal amount of 14% Senior Secured Notes due 2013 were co-issued by FriendFinder and its wholly-owned subsidiary Interactive Network, Inc (“INI”), the parent of Various (the “New First Lien Notes”), of which (a) $200,185,000 was exchanged for $130,485,000 outstanding principal amount of First Lien Notes, $49,361,000 outstanding principal amount of Second Lien Notes and $14,551,000 outstanding principal amount of Senior Secured Notes, (b) $91,400,000 was issued for cash proceeds of $89,572,000 before payment of related fees and expenses of $5,834,000 and (c) $13,415,000 was issued to pay commitment fees to the holders of First Lien Notes and Second Lien Notes. Cash of $86,237,000 was used to redeem $36,608,000 outstanding principal amount of First Lien Notes at 102% of principal, $30,639,000 outstanding principal amount of Second Lien Notes (representing the remaining outstanding principal amounts of First Lien Notes and Second Lien Notes) and $18,258,000 outstanding principal amount

F-42

FRIENDFINDER NETWORKS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE J — LONG-TERM DEBT (Continued)

of Senior Secured Notes. Cash was also used to pay $4,132,000 of accrued interest on the exchanged and redeemed notes, an $825,000 redemption premium on certain exchanged First Lien Notes and $435,000 in commitment fees to certain noteholders.

The remaining $13,502,000 outstanding principal amount of Senior Secured Notes were exchanged for $13,778,000 principal amount of 14% Cash Pay Second Lien Notes due 2013 co-issued by FriendFinder and INI (the “Cash Pay Second Lien Notes”). Subordinated Convertible Notes and Subordinated Term Notes, with outstanding principal amounts of $180,184,000 and $42,811,000, respectively, together with accrued interest of $9,462,000, were exchanged for $232,457,000 principal amount of 11.5% Non-Cash Pay Second Lien Notes due 2014 co-issued by FriendFinder and INI (the “Non-Cash Pay Second Lien Notes”).

The Company has determined that the New First Lien Notes are not substantially different from the outstanding First Lien Notes and Second Lien Notes for which they were exchanged, nor are the Non-Cash Pay Second Lien Notes substantially different from the outstanding Subordinated Convertible Notes for which they were exchanged, based on the less than 10% difference in present values of cash flows of the respective debt instruments and, therefore, such exchanges are accounted for as if the outstanding notes were not extinguished. Accordingly, a new effective interest rate has been determined for the outstanding notes based on the carrying amount of such notes and the revised cash flows of the newly issued notes. In connection therewith, commitment fees paid to the note holders, together with an allocable portion of existing unamortized discount, debt issuance and modification costs will be amortized as an adjustment of interest expense over the remaining term of the new notes using the effective interest method. The effective interest rate on the New First Lien Notes and on the Non-Cash Pay Second Lien Notes which were exchanged for the Subordinated Convertible Notes is 19.0% and 14.3%, respectively. Private placement fees related to the New First Lien Notes, together with legal and other fees aggregating $4,562,000 allocated to the exchanges, were charged to other finance expenses in the accompanying consolidated statement of operations.

The Company has determined that the New First Lien Notes and Cash Pay Second Lien Notes are substantially different than the outstanding $28,053,000 principal amount of Senior Secured Notes for which they were exchanged based on the more than 10% difference in present values of cash flows of the respective debt instruments and, accordingly, the exchanges are accounted for as an extinguishment of the Senior Secured Notes. The Company recorded a net pre-tax loss on debt extinguishment of $10.5 million related to such exchanged Senior Secured Notes and to the Senior Secured Notes and First Lien Notes and Second Lien Notes redeemed for cash. The loss is based on the excess of the fair value of the new notes issued, which was determined to be their issue price of $28,053,000 and cash paid on redemption over the carrying amounts of the extinguished notes. In addition, the loss includes the writeoff of unamortized costs and fees aggregating $8,646,000 related to the notes which were extinguished.

The Company has also determined that the Non-Cash Pay Second Lien Notes are substantially different than the non-convertible Subordinated Term Notes for which they were exchanged based on the conversion feature in the new notes and, accordingly, the exchange is accounted for as an extinguishment of the Subordinated Term Notes. The Company determined that the estimated fair value of the $48,760,000 principal amount of Non-Cash Pay Second Lien Notes exchanged was $45,726,000, resulting in an approximate effective interest rate of 11.9%, and discount of $3,034,000 which resulted in debt extinguishment gain of $3,034,000.

(b)

The New First Lien Notes, of which approximately $112,020,000 principal amount were issued to the Company’s stockholders, including $7,460,000 to entities controlled by certain officers and directors, were issued with an original issue discount of $6,100,000, or 2.0%. The notes mature on September 30, 2013 and accrue interest at a rate per annum equal to 14.0%. Interest on the notes is payable quarterly on March 31, June 30, September 30 and December 31 of each year. Principal on the New First Lien Notes is payable quarterly to the extent of 75% of Excess Cash Flow, as defined, at 102% of principal, subject to pro-rata sharing

F-43

FRIENDFINDER NETWORKS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE J — LONG-TERM DEBT (Continued)

with the Cash Pay Second Lien Notes. The New First Lien Notes are guaranteed by domestic subsidiaries of FriendFinder and INI and are collateralized by a first-priority lien on all of the Company’s assets as well as a pledge of stock of subsidiaries. The New First Lien Notes are redeemable prior to maturity at the option of the Company, in whole but not in part, at 110% of principal, plus accrued and unpaid interest. In the event of an IPO, the net proceeds must be used to redeem the New First Lien Notes and Cash Pay Second Lien Notes pro-rata at 110% of principal plus accrued and unpaid interest. In addition, noteholders have the option of requiring the Company to repay the New First Lien Notes and Cash Pay Second Lien Notes in full upon a Change of Control, as defined, at 110% of principal. The Company shall also repay the New First Lien Notes and, in certain circumstances, the Cash Pay Second Lien Notes, with proceeds received from any debt or equity financing (including a secondary offering) and asset sales of more than $25 million at 110% of principal, and with proceeds from other asset sales, insurance claims, condemnation and other extraordinary cash receipts at principal, subject to certain exceptions.

(c)

The Cash Pay Second Lien Notes, all of which were issued to entities controlled by stockholders who are also officers and directors, were issued with an original issue discount of $276,000, or 2%, mature on September 30, 2013 and have identical terms to those of the New First Lien Notes, except as to matters regarding collateral, subordination, enforcement and voting. The Cash Pay Second Lien Notes are collateralized by a fully subordinated second lien on substantially all of the assets of the Company, pari passu with the Non-Cash Pay Second Lien Notes, and will vote with the New First Lien Notes on a dollar for dollar basis on all matters except for matters relating to collateral, liens and enforcement of rights and remedies. As to such matters, the Cash Pay Second Lien Notes will vote with the Non-Cash Pay Second Lien Notes.

(d)

The Non-Cash Pay Second Lien Notes, of which approximately $228,519,000 principal amount were issued to the Company’s stockholders, including $44,402,000 to entities controlled by certain officers and directors, mature on April 30, 2014 and bear interest at 11.5%, payable semi-annually on June 30 and December 31, which may be paid in additional notes at the Company’s option. While the New First Lien Notes are in place, interest must be paid with additional notes. During 2010, interest amounting to $4,752,000 was paid through the issuance of additional Non-Cash Pay Second Lien Notes. The Non-Cash Pay Second Lien Notes are guaranteed by the domestic subsidiaries of FriendFinder and INI and collateralized by a second priority lien on all of the Company’s assets and a pledge of the stock of subsidiaries; however, such security interest is subordinate to the prior payment of the New First Lien Notes. The Non-Cash Pay Second Lien Notes are redeemable, at the option of the Company, in whole but not in part, at 100% of principal plus accrued and unpaid interest. Upon the payment in full of the New First Lien Notes, principal on the Non-Cash Pay Second Lien Notes is payable quarterly to the extent of 75% of Excess Cash Flow, as defined, at 102% of principal subject to pro-rata sharing with the Cash Pay Second Lien Notes. Upon an IPO, if the New First Lien Notes are paid in full, the net proceeds must be used to redeem the Non-Cash Pay Second Lien Notes and Cash Pay Second Lien Notes on a pro-rata basis at 110% of principal plus accrued and unpaid interest. In addition, noteholders have the option of requiring the Company to repay the Non-Cash Pay Second Lien Notes in full upon a Change of Control, as defined, at 110% of principal plus accrued and unpaid interest. If the New First Lien Notes are paid in full, the Company shall repay the Non-Cash Pay Second Lien Notes and Cash Pay Second Lien Notes on a pro-rata basis with proceeds received from any debt or equity financing (including a secondary offering), and asset sales of more than $25 million at 110% of principal plus accrued and unpaid interest and with proceeds of other asset sales, insurance claims, condemnation and other extraordinary cash receipts at principal, subject to certain exceptions. The Non-Cash Pay Second Lien Notes will become convertible into shares of the Company’s common stock upon or after an IPO solely at the option of the holders. The conversion price of the notes will be at the per share offering price for the Company’s common stock upon consummation of the IPO provided that such conversion option shall be limited to approximately 21.1% of the Company’s fully diluted equity.

F-44

FRIENDFINDER NETWORKS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE J — LONG-TERM DEBT (Continued)

As described in Note I, if the costs of eliminating the pre-acquisition VAT liabilities is less than $25 million, exclusive of costs paid from the escrow fund, then the principal amount of the Non-Cash Pay Second Lien Notes will be increased by the issuance of additional such notes for the unused portion of the $29 million, plus interest at 6% on the increased principal from the date of acquisition.

(e)

The New First Lien Notes, the Cash Pay Second Lien Notes and Non-Cash Pay Second Lien Notes (1) require the Company to maintain minimum specified levels of EBITDA and liquidity and financial ratios, including debt and coverage ratios, all as defined, (2) provides for certain limitations including limits on indebtedness, lease obligations, VAT payments and investments and (3) prohibits dividends and other payments with respect to the Company’s equity securities.

As described above, the New First Lien Notes, the Cash Pay Second Lien Notes and the Non-Cash Pay Second Lien Notes were co-issued by FriendFinder and its wholly-owned subsidiary INI and guaranteed by their domestic subsidiaries, which are 100% owned directly or indirectly by FriendFinder. FriendFinder and INI are holding companies and have no independent assets or operations. The subsidiary guarantees are full and unconditional and joint and several and any subsidiaries of FriendFinder other than the subsidiary guarantors are minor.

The Company has agreed to consummate exchange offers pursuant to an effective registration statement to be filed with the SEC to allow the holders of the New First Lien Notes, Cash Pay Second Lien Notes and Non-Cash Pay Second Lien Notes to exchange their notes for a new issue of substantially identical notes with identical guarantees. In addition, the Company has agreed to file, under certain circumstances, a shelf registration statement to cover resales of the New First Lien Notes, Cash Pay Second Lien Notes and Non-Cash Pay Second Lien Notes. The Company has further agreed to use its reasonable best efforts, subject to applicable law, to cause to become effective a registration statement within 210 calendar days and to consummate the exchange offers within 240 days following the consummation of an IPO of its common stock. In the event that the Company fails to satisfy the registration and/or exchange requirements within the prescribed time periods, the interest rate on the New First Lien Notes, Cash Pay Second Lien Notes and Non-Cash Pay Second Lien Notes will be increased by 3.5%.

(f)

The New First Lien Notes (“First Lien Notes”), of which approximately $110,000,000 principal amount were issued to the Company’s stockholders including $10,000,000 to entities controlled by certain officers and directors, were issued with an original issue discount of $7,720,000, or approximately 3.0%, were to mature on June 30, 2011, and accrued interest at a rate per annum equal to the sum of the greater of three month LIBOR (0.25% at December 31, 2009) or 4.5%, plus 8.0%. Interest on the notes was payable quarterly on March 31, June 30, September 30 and December 31 of each year. Principal on the First Lien Notes was payable quarterly to the extent of 90% of Excess Cash Flow, as defined, subject to minimum amounts.

The First Lien Notes were guaranteed by Various and its subsidiaries and were collateralized by a first-priority lien on all of their assets as well as a pledge of the Various stock and a lien on any rights to indemnification and other rights under the purchase agreement with the former stockholders of Various. In addition, FriendFinder and each of FriendFinder’s subsidiaries guaranteed INI’s obligations under the notes. The guarantees were collateralized by the assets of the guarantors; however, such security interest was subordinate to the security interest of holders of FriendFinder’s Senior Notes.

The Second Lien Subordinated Secured Notes (“Second Lien Notes”) were to mature on December 6, 2011, bore interest at 15% payable quarterly in cash, were guaranteed by Various and its subsidiaries and were collateralized by a second-priority lien on all of their assets and a pledge of the Various stock. The notes were also guaranteed by FriendFinder and its subsidiaries which guarantees were collateralized by the assets of the guarantors; however, such security interest were subordinate to those holders of FriendFinder’s Senior Notes and the First Lien Notes.

F-45

FRIENDFINDER NETWORKS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE J — LONG-TERM DEBT (Continued)

The Company issued to the purchasers of the First Lien Notes and Second Lien Notes detachable warrants to purchase 4,210,623 and 1,187,980 shares of the Company’s common stock, respectively, at an exercise price of $0.0002 per share. The warrants expire in December 2017, or, if earlier, upon the consummation of an underwritten public offering of the Company’s common stock. The aggregate warrant value of $30,120,000, which was credited to capital in excess of par value, was recorded as a discount of $23,492,000 on the First Lien Notes and $6,628,000 on the Second Lien Notes and was being amortized as interest expense (by use of the interest method) over the term of the respective notes. The Company has granted the holders of the warrants piggyback and up to three demand registration rights to register the shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of the warrants. In addition, certain principal stockholders of the Company granted to former owners of Various in connection with their holdings of First Lien Notes fully vested options to purchase 1,019,064 shares of the Company’s common stock owned by the principal stockholders at an exercise price of $0.20 per share. The options are exercisable at any time until the consummation of a Qualified IPO, as defined. The fair value of the options, amounting to $5,706,000, was credited to capital in excess of par value and recorded as a discount on the First Lien Notes.

The First Lien Notes and Second Lien Notes required INI and its subsidiaries to maintain specified levels of EBITDA and other financial ratios and limited their capital expenditures and indebtedness. In addition, the First Lien Notes and Second Lien Notes provided that INI could distribute to FriendFinder up to 10% of INI’s Excess Cash Flow, as defined, each quarter for the purpose of making interest payments on FriendFinder’s Senior Notes provided no defaults exist or would result therefrom. INI was also allowed to distribute to FriendFinder not more than $6 million ($5 million of which was to be used for general corporate purposes) during the first quarter of fiscal 2008 and an additional $3 million during fiscal 2008, at the rate of $1 million each subsequent quarter, which was limited to actual fees and expenses of third parties incurred in connection with an IPO. The Company required a modification of the note agreements or waivers thereof to receive additional distributions for IPO expenses or general corporate purposes for periods subsequent to December 31, 2008. During 2008 amounts distributed from INI for payment of IPO expenses were used for general corporate purposes. In addition, in January, April and July 2009, INI distributed additional funds to pay expenses to be incurred during the first, second and third quarters of 2009. These transactions constituted a breach of covenants under the note agreements.

Events of default occurred with respect to the First Lien Notes and Second Lien Notes relating to certain representations and warranties having been materially incorrect when made. In addition, during 2008 and 2009, the Company had not performed or complied with certain conditions, covenants and agreements, including the restricted payment covenant referred to above, a financial covenant to achieve a minimum consolidated annualized EBITDA and other affirmative and negative covenants during each of the quarters ended March 31, June 30, and September 30, 2008.

On October 8, 2009, the Company received waivers of existing events of default under the note agreements from holders of its First and Second Lien Notes and Senior Secured Notes. In addition, certain covenants in the First Lien Note and Second Lien Note agreements were amended or added relating to, among other matters, consolidated EBITDA, total debt ratios, consolidated coverage ratios, limits to total permitted VAT payments and permitted payments from INI to FriendFinder for interest on Senior Secured Notes, general corporate purposes and IPO expenses. Certain of such amendments cured existing events of default with respect to certain financial and other covenants, including restricted payments to FriendFinder. In consideration for the amendments, waivers and consents relating to the Company’s changes in capitalization and other matters, the Company paid the holders of the First Lien Notes and Second Lien Notes an amendment fee of approximately $5,594,000, equal to 2% of the outstanding principal amount of their respective notes. In addition, on March 31, 2010, the Company paid a waiver fee of $2,613,000.

F-46

FRIENDFINDER NETWORKS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE J — LONG-TERM DEBT (Continued)

From June 28, 2010 through September 30, 2010, the Company received commitments from the holders of First Lien Notes and Second Lien Notes having an aggregate outstanding principal balance of $234.4 million, to exchange their notes for new first lien notes which will mature in 3 years from the date of issuance. In connection with, and in partial consideration for such commitments, the Company paid a cash commitment fee of $2,231,000 and issued additional first lien notes of $13,415,000 to such lenders on the consummation of the restructuring.

(g)

The Subordinated Convertible Notes (“Convertible Notes”) were to mature on December 6, 2011 and bore interest at 6% which was paid in additional Convertible Notes at INI’s option. The notes had been recorded at estimated fair value at the date of issuance, resulting in an effective interest rate of approximately 13% and discount of $24,977,000, which was being amortized as interest expense (by use of the interest method) over the term of the notes. During 2008, interest amounting to $6,892,000 was paid through issuance of additional Convertible Notes. The notes were the unsecured obligation of INI and were guaranteed by FriendFinder. The notes were subordinate in right of payment to the First Lien Notes and Second Lien Notes. The guarantee was subordinate to the prior payment of FriendFinder’s Senior Notes and the guarantee of the First Lien Notes and Second Lien Notes and pari passu in right of payment with FriendFinder’s Subordinated Term Notes. The notes which had an original principal amount of $170,000,000 were subject to reduction to the extent certain post-closing bonuses of up to $3.5 million were paid by Various over a three-year period and for a post-closing working capital adjustment. During 2009 and 2008, respectively, as a result of payment of $1.3 and $1.4 million in bonuses which were charged to expense, the principal amount of the notes was reduced and the carrying value of the notes was reduced by $1.1 and $1.1 million, respectively, with a corresponding reduction in goodwill. The post-closing working capital adjustment determined by the Company resulted in an indemnity claim which has been reflected as a reduction of $64,279,357 in the principal amount of the notes and a $10,000,000 receivable from an escrow fund set up in connection with the acquisition.

Until the First Lien Notes and Second Lien Notes and FriendFinder’s Senior Secured Notes were repaid in full, no payments of principal or interest (other than interest payable through issuance of additional notes) could be made on the Convertible Notes. The Convertible Notes were convertible into shares of FriendFinder’s common stock, in whole or in part, at either the holder’s or the Company’s option, at any time after the later to occur of (i) the one-year anniversary of the date of their issuance and (ii) the consummation of an IPO. The conversion price was to be the per share offering price in the IPO. If converted at the holder’s option, the aggregate number of shares issuable upon the conversion of the notes was to be the number of shares not to exceed 17% of the fully diluted equity of the Company calculated at the time of the first such conversion.

In June 2009, as a result of the elimination the United Kingdom VAT liability (see Note I), the principal balance of the Convertible Notes was increased by approximately $38 million, representing the principal reduction previously recorded at the date of acquisition for the post-closing working capital adjustment described above related to United Kingdom VAT liability at such date. In connection therewith, a discount of approximately $9 million was recorded on the notes to reflect an effective interest rate of approximately 13% representing the rate used at the date of acquisition to record the notes at estimated fair value. The discount was accounted for as a reduction in purchase price resulting in a reduction of approximately $5.4 million in goodwill, net of a $3.6 million increase in the liability for deferred taxes attributable to the discount.

On October 8, 2009, agreements were entered into with the former owners of Various, pursuant to which the principal amount of Convertible Notes was fixed at $156 million (which includes approximately $7 million of accrued interest from January 1, 2009 through June 30, 2009) and the Company released the former owners from any indemnity claims relating to VAT liabilities or any other matter relating to the acquisition. Interest at 6%, payable in additional notes, accrues on the increased principal from the date of the Various acquisition. In addition, the notes were amended to eliminate the Company’s option to convert the notes into common stock.

F-47

FRIENDFINDER NETWORKS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE J — LONG-TERM DEBT (Continued)

Further, the former owners agreed to allow the $10 million escrow fund set up in connection with the acquisition to be used to pay pre-acquisition VAT liabilities and related expenses. To the extent such payments are less than $10 million, any balance then remaining in the fund was to be released to the former owners. As of December 31, 2010, the escrow fund balance had been fully expended. If the costs of eliminating the pre-acquisition VAT liabilities was less than $29 million, exclusive of costs paid from the escrow fund, then the principal of the Convertible Notes was to be increased by the issuance of additional Convertible Notes for the unused portion of the $29 million, plus interest at 6% on the increased principal from the date of acquisition. The agreements further provide, among other matters, for the Company to pay fees to the former owners aggregating $3.2 million during the period from 2010 to the first quarter of 2013, subject to payment in full of the First Lien Notes and the Senior Secured Notes and also pay a consent fee in an amount equivalent to the amount paid to the Company’s Chairman and the Company’s Chief Executive Officer subject to the same terms and conditions described in the fourth paragraph of Note R.

During 2009, interest amounting to $15,155,000, including $4,364,000 on the increased principal from the date of acquisition, was paid through the issuance of additional Convertible Notes. In addition, interest expense includes $4,051,000 of amortization of discount recorded in connection with the increased principal. Of the total interest expense charged to operations in 2009, including amortization of discount attributable to the increased principal, approximately $6,600,000 relates to periods through December 31, 2008. During 2010 interest amounting to $10,377,000 was paid through the issuance of additional Convertible Notes.

The modification to eliminate the Company’s option to convert the Convertible Notes into common stock is considered to result in an exchange of debt instruments with substantially different terms thereby requiring the Company to account for the modification like an extinguishment of the existing Convertible Notes and the creation of new Convertible Notes. This modification resulted in the Company recording a charge for the extinguishment of debt of approximately $7.2 million attributable to the excess of the fair value of the modified notes over the carrying value of the existing notes plus the $2.3 million present value of the $3.2 million of fees described above. The new notes were valued at $140 million, net of discount of approximately $31 million based on an effective interest rate of approximately 15%.

On August 20, 2010, the Company received commitments from the holders of the Convertible Notes to exchange their notes for new Non-Cash Pay Second Lien Notes. No additional consideration was paid for these commitments.

(h)

In connection with the acquisition of Various, INI issued a non-interest bearing obligation with a principal balance of $5.0 million to a former owner. In each of 2009 and 2008, $1.0 million of the notes were paid and 3.0 million was paid in 2010. The obligation was recorded at a present value of $3.6 million using a discount rate of 15%.

As described in (g) above, in connection with the restructuring of the Convertible Notes, the Company agreed to pay $3.2 million of fees to the former owners of Various of which $1 million was paid in December 2010, $1 million is payable in each of 2011 and 2012 and $250,000 is payable in the first quarter of 2013. The obligation was recorded at a present value of $2.3 million using a discount rate of 15%.

(i)

The Senior Secured Notes were scheduled to mature on July 31, 2010 and bore interest at 15% payable quarterly in cash. The notes were collateralized by a first-priority security interest in all of the Company’s assets, other than those of INI and its subsidiaries for which a third-priority secured interest had been granted.

On October 8, 2009, certain covenants in the Senior Secured Notes were amended relating to, among other matters, maintaining minimum consolidated coverage ratios and consolidated EBITDA. Such amendments cured existing events of default with respect to quarterly financial covenants through June 30, 2009. Additional covenants relating to total permitted VAT payments and required liquidity levels were added. In consideration

F-48

FRIENDFINDER NETWORKS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE J — LONG-TERM DEBT (Continued)

for the amendments and waivers, the Company issued approximately $1.8 million of additional notes to the holders of the Senior Secured Notes, equal to 4% of the outstanding principal amount.

On June 28, 2010, an agreement was entered into between FriendFinder and the holders of the Senior Secured Notes which granted FriendFinder in exchange for a fee of approximately $463,000, an option to require the note holders to extend the maturity date of the notes to January 1, 2011. On July 7, 2010, FriendFinder exercised the option. Additionally, on June 28, 2010, the Company received commitments from holders of $32.8 million of outstanding Senior Secured Notes to exchange such notes for, or acquire for cash, $37.3 million of new first lien notes which will mature in 3.5 years from the date of issuance. In addition, the Company received commitments from holders of $13.5 million of outstanding Senior Secured Notes, who are principal stockholders as well as officers and directors of the Company and their affiliates, to exchange their notes for new second lien notes which pay interest in cash and will mature in 3.5 years from the date of issuance. In connection with, and in partial consideration for such commitments, the Company paid cash fees to lenders of $2,862,000.

(j)

The Subordinated Term Notes, which were held by entities controlled by certain principal stockholders of the Company who are also officers and directors, were to mature on October 1, 2011 and bore interest at 13% payable annually principally through the issuance of additional subordinated notes. The Subordinated Term Notes were collateralized by a second priority security interest in all assets of the Company other than those held by INI and its subsidiaries and were subordinate to the notes issued by INI as well as the Senior Secured Notes issued by FriendFinder.

On October 8, 2009, certain covenants in the Subordinated Term Notes were waived in consideration for which, in addition to previous waivers received, the Company paid an approximately $1.6 million amendment fee equal to 4% of the outstanding principal balance of such notes by issuing additional like kind notes to the note holders.

On June 28, 2010, the Company received commitments from the holders of $37.3 million of outstanding Subordinated Term Notes to exchange their notes for Non-Cash Pay Second Lien Notes for no additional consideration.

Principal of long-term debt outstanding at December 31, 2010 matures as follows (in thousands):

Year	Amount
2011	$	15,753
2012		1,000
2013		304,275
2014		237,211
	$	558,239

As described above, principal payments on the New First Lien Notes and Cash Pay Second Lien Notes may be accelerated depending on the excess cash flows of the Company. On February 4, 2011 and March 2, 2011, the Company repaid an aggregate of approximately $14.8 million of principal on the New First Lien Notes and Cash Pay Second Lien Notes under such excess cash flow repayment calculation related to excess cash flow through December 31, 2010, which principal amount is included in the 2011 maturities in the above table.

NOTE K — LIABILITY RELATED TO WARRANTS

In conjunction with its August 2005 issuance of Senior Secured Notes, the Company issued warrants to purchase 501,663 shares of the Company’s common stock (of which 476,573 are exercisable at $6.20 per share and 25,090 are exercisable at $10.25 per share) that contained a provision that required a reduction of the exercise

F-49

FRIENDFINDER NETWORKS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE K — LIABILITY RELATED TO WARRANTS (Continued)

price if certain equity events occur. Under the provisions of authoritative guidance which became effective for the Company at January 1, 2009, such a reset provision no longer makes the warrants eligible for equity classification and as such, effective January 1, 2009, the Company classified these warrants as a liability at a fair value of $6,341,000 with a corresponding increase of $1,585,000 to accumulated deficit and a $4,756,000 reduction to capital in excess of par value. The liability is measured at fair value with changes in fair value reflected in operations. In connection therewith, for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2010, a gain of $2,744,000 and $38,000, respectively, on remeasurement of the liability is included in the accompanying consolidated statement of operations.

The Company’s warrants were measured at fair value based on a binomial options pricing model using valuation inputs which are based on management’s internal assumptions (which are not readily observable) at December 31, 2009 and December 31, 2010, respectively, as follows: 1) dividend yield of 0% and 0%; 2) volatility of 54.7% and 43.3%; 3) risk-free interest rate of 2.7% and 1.9%; and 4) expected life of 5.5 years and 4.75 years.

NOTE L — PREFERRED STOCK, COMMON STOCK AND WARRANTS

On November 13, 2007, FriendFinder’s articles of incorporation were amended to authorize it to issue 62,500,000 shares of common stock having a par value of $0.01 per share, of which 12,500,000 shares were designated as Series B common stock non-voting; and 12,500,000 shares of preferred stock having a par value of $0.01 per share, of which 2,500,000 shares were designated as Series A Convertible Preferred Stock (“Series A Preferred”) and 10,000,000 shares were designated as Series B Convertible Preferred Stock (“Series B Preferred”).

Other than voting, the rights of the common stock and the Series B common stock are identical. In general, the Series B common stock can be exchanged for a like number of shares of common stock immediately prior to the earliest to occur of (i) a consummation of a sale of all or substantially all of the assets or capital stock of the Company to any unaffiliated third party or with certain exceptions, the merger, consolidation or combination of the Company with any third party or (ii) the consummation of an underwritten IPO of securities of the Company or the reverse merger of the Company with or into a publicly traded company.

Series B Preferred ranks senior to FriendFinder’s common stock and on parity with the Series A Preferred. Series B Preferred may be converted at the holder’s option at any time into shares of FriendFinder’s voting common stock at the initial rate of one share of voting common stock for each share of Series B Preferred, subject to adjustment for certain dilutive events. Series B Preferred shares carry voting rights on all matters to be voted upon by the stockholders, and on any particular matter each holder of Series B Preferred is entitled to the number of votes equal to the number of whole shares of voting common stock into which such holder’s Series B Preferred shares would be convertible as of the record date for determining the stockholders entitled to vote on the matter. Series B Preferred shares are entitled to receive ratably such dividends, if any, as may be declared by the board of directors. Dividends are not cumulative. Each share of Series B Preferred has a liquidation preference equal to the greater of (x) the original issue price for such share (approximately $0.59 per share), plus declared and accrued but unpaid dividends, and (y) such amount as would have been payable had such share been converted into voting common stock immediately prior to the liquidation, dissolution or winding up of the Company (“Liquidation Preference Amount”). Subject to certain conditions, the holders of the Series B Preferred have preemptive rights on any sale by FriendFinder of any shares of, or any securities convertible into or exercisable for shares of, any class of FriendFinder’s capital stock. Such preemptive rights expire immediately prior to an IPO.

Series A Preferred ranks senior to FriendFinder’s common stock and on parity with the Series B Preferred. Series A Preferred may be converted at the holder’s option at any time into shares of FriendFinder’s voting common stock at the initial rate of one share of voting common stock for each share of Series A Preferred, subject to adjustment for certain dilutive events. As a result of a dilutive issuance of warrants in connection with the acquisition of Various, each share of Series A Preferred is convertible into approximately 1.13 shares of voting common stock.

F-50

FRIENDFINDER NETWORKS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE L — PREFERRED STOCK, COMMON STOCK AND WARRANTS (Continued)

Series A Preferred shares carry voting rights on all matters to be voted upon by the stockholders, and on any particular matter each holder of Series A Preferred is entitled to the number of votes equal to the number of whole shares of voting common stock into which such holder’s Series A Preferred shares would be convertible as of the record date for determining the stockholders entitled to vote on the matter. Under certain circumstances, the written consent of certain holders of Series A Preferred (or an affiliate of such holders) was required to take certain actions, including, for example, to amend FriendFinder’s articles of incorporation, effect a change of control, and declare any dividend or make any distribution on any of FriendFinder’s capital stock. Series A Preferred shares are entitled to receive ratably such dividends, if any, as may be declared by the board of directors. Dividends are not cumulative. Each share of Series A Preferred has a liquidation preference equal to the greater of (x) the original issue price for such share ($11.89 per share), plus declared and accrued but unpaid dividends, and (y) such amount as would have been payable had such share been converted into voting common stock immediately prior to the liquidation, dissolution or winding up of the Company (“Liquidation Preference Amount”). Subject to certain conditions, the holders of the Series A Preferred have preemptive rights on any sale by FriendFinder of any shares of, or any securities convertible into or exercisable for shares of, any class of FriendFinder’s capital stock. Such preemptive rights expire immediately prior to an IPO.

No dividend may be declared or paid on shares of common stock unless holders of Series A Preferred and Series B Preferred first or simultaneously receive a per share dividend equivalent to that payable on common shares into which the Series A and Series B Preferred are then convertible. All accrued but unpaid dividends must be included in the liquidation preference of the preferred stock payable upon a liquidation, dissolution or winding up of the Company.

On January 25, 2010, the Company amended and restated the certificate of designation for the Series A Preferred to eliminate the Company’s obligation to obtain the consent of certain holders of the Series A Preferred (or an affiliate of such holders) before taking certain actions, including, among other things, purchasing or acquiring any capital stock of the Company, effecting a change of control, or declaring or paying dividends. In addition, among other changes, redemption payments, in the event of a change of control or a qualified IPO, and preemptive rights were eliminated. In addition, on January 25, 2010, the Company also amended and restated the certificate of designation for the Series B Preferred to, among other changes, eliminate redemption payments in the event of a change of control or a qualified IPO and also eliminate preemptive rights.

As of December 31, 2009, upon a change of control, as defined, or a qualified IPO, as defined, the holders of both Series A Preferred and Series B Preferred were entitled to be paid out of the assets of the Company an amount per share equal to their respective Liquidation Preference Amount in exchange for their preferred shares. As a result, the Series A Preferred and Series B Preferred are classified for accounting purposes as “temporary equity” in the accompanying balance sheet at December 31, 2009 as the Company could have been required to redeem the preferred stock for cash. As the preferred stock was not currently redeemable at December 31, 2009, it is being carried at its original issue price, which represents the minimum redemption amount at such dates. In January 2010, as a result of the amendments and restatements of the certificates of designation for the convertible preferred stocks described above, the carrying amount of the preferred stock was reclassified to permanent equity.

On December 6, 2007, the Company’s principal stockholders granted a holder of common and preferred shares a fully vested option to purchase from the principal stockholders an aggregate of 128,900 shares of the Company’s common stock at an exercise price of $0.20 per share as a result of the dilutive effect of the 1,343,997 common shares issuable under the Company’s 2008 stock option plan (see Note M). On January 22, 2010, this option was exercised.

Subject to certain conditions and limitations, FriendFinder has granted the holders of Series A Preferred piggyback and demand registration rights to register the shares of common stock issuable upon conversion of the Series A Preferred or the exercise of related warrants.

F-51

FRIENDFINDER NETWORKS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE L — PREFERRED STOCK, COMMON STOCK AND WARRANTS (Continued)

As of December 31, 2010, outstanding warrants to purchase voting common stock of the Company are as follows:

Expiration Date⁽¹⁾	Exercise Price
August 2015	$	6.20	⁽⁴⁾	476,573	⁽⁴⁾
August 2015	$	10.25	⁽⁴⁾	25,090
August 2015	$	0.0002		243,287
August 2016	$	0.0002		441,474
December 2017	$	0.0002		4,692,996	⁽³⁾
				5,879,420

⁽¹⁾

Except for warrants to purchase 1,373,859 shares of common stock at $0.0002 per share which were amended on October 8, 2009, warrants terminate if not exercised concurrently with the consummation of an IPO, if earlier than their stated expiration date.

⁽²⁾

The number of shares of common stock for which each warrant is exercisable will be decreased immediately prior to the closing of an IPO in the event that the Company has issued prior to such IPO fewer than 1,343,997 shares or options pursuant to an equity incentive or benefit plan except for the warrants exercisable at $10.25. The adjustment provision for such warrants is triggered if the Company has issued fewer than 588,890 shares or options pursuant to an equity incentive or benefit plan prior to the closing of an IPO.

⁽³⁾

With respect to warrants to acquire 2,441,989 common shares, in order to maintain the warrant holders’ percentage of fully diluted equity, the number of shares of common stock for which each such warrant is exercisable shall be increased immediately prior to the closing of an IPO based on the number of shares of common stock into which the Non-Cash Pay Second Lien Notes which were exchanged for Convertible Notes issued to selling stockholders in the acquisition of Various, will be convertible based on the IPO price.

⁽⁴⁾

Adjusted for subsequent dilutive issuances of equity securities.

On May 18, 2008, certain of the Company’s stockholders exercised warrants issued in connection with the First Lien Notes having an exercise price of $0.0002 (see Note J(f)) for an aggregate of 1,686,700 shares of its voting common stock, resulting in a transfer of $1,350 from capital in excess of par value to common stock for the par value of the shares.

On July 13, 2009, warrants issued in connection with the First Lien Notes having an exercise price of $0.0002 were exercised for an aggregate of 81,812 shares of the Company’s voting common stock resulting in a transfer of $66 from capital in excess of par value to common stock for the par value of the shares.

On December 10, 2009, warrants issued in connection with the First Lien Notes having an exercise price of $0.0002 were exercised for an aggregate of 1,188,107 shares of the Company’s voting common stock, resulting in a transfer of $950 from capital in excess of par value to common stock for the par value of the shares.

In August 2009, the Company received an informal demand from an existing holder of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock and Series B Convertible Preferred Stock claiming a right to warrants exercisable at $0.0002 per share for approximately 800,000 shares of common stock in satisfaction of the conversion price adjustment with respect to its Series A Convertible Preferred Stock in connection with the Company’s issuance of Series B Convertible Preferred Stock. On October 27, 2010, this potential claim was resolved as the parties entered into a Settlement and Mutual Release pursuant to which the Company made a cash payment of $985,000 which was charged to capital in excess of par value.

NOTE M — STOCK OPTIONS

On April 3, 2008, the Company’s Board of Directors adopted the 2008 Stock Option Plan (the “Plan”). The maximum number of shares for which stock options may be granted under the Plan is 1,343,997 shares, subject

F-52

FRIENDFINDER NETWORKS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE M — STOCK OPTIONS (Continued)

to adjustment. Stock options may be issued to employees, directors and consultants, selected by a committee of the Board of Directors.

Under the terms of the Plan, the options granted will expire no later than 10 years from the date of grant and will vest 20% on the first anniversary of the grant date and 20% on each succeeding four anniversaries of the grant date, provided, however, that an optionee may exercise the vested portion of a stock option only after that date which is 18 months after the date of an IPO of the Company’s common stock. The exercise price of an option shall be the closing price of the common stock on a national securities exchange on the date immediately preceding the date of grant, or if the common stock is not traded on a national securities exchange, its fair value as determined in good faith by the board of directors. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the exercise price per share of any stock option agreement issued prior to an IPO will be the price per share of the Company’s common stock to be sold pursuant to an IPO.

In 2008, 2009 and 2010, the Company issued agreements to grant options to purchase a total of 708,550 shares, 25,500 shares and 43,250 shares, respectively, of the Company’s common stock to employees, non employee directors as well as to one board advisor under the Plan. In addition, in 2008, 2009 and 2010, respectively, options for 20,250 shares, 66,750 shares and 138,500 shares under such agreements were forfeited. As of December 31, 2010, there were outstanding agreements to grant options to acquire 551,750 common shares. The exercise price of these options will be set at the price per share that the Company’s common stock is sold to the public pursuant to an IPO.

As a successful completion of an IPO is necessary in order for an option to be exercised, no compensation cost will be recognized until the occurrence of such event. Consequently, the Company has not recognized any compensation related to these options during the years ended December 31, 2008, 2009 and 2010. Upon successful completion of an IPO, compensation cost will be accrued for each vesting tranche over the requisite service period commencing on the date the options were granted and ending on the later of the vesting date or 18 months after the date of the IPO. Accordingly, the date the IPO is completed, a cumulative adjustment will be made to record compensation cost which accrued prior to such date, based on the fair value of the options on the IPO date.

Estimated stock-based compensation to be recognized subsequent to completion of this offering for options outstanding at December 31, 2010 will be approximately $2.4 million, based upon an initial price of $10.00 per share, which is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of two years. Of such amount a cumulative adjustment to compensation expense of approximately $2.0 million will be realized upon completion of this offering.

NOTE N — INCOME TAXES

FriendFinder and its subsidiaries file a consolidated federal income tax return.

The components of the income tax benefit are as follows (in thousands):

	2010			2009			2008
Current:
Federal	$	162		$	—		$	374
State		630			—			—
		792			—			374
Deferred:
Federal		(1,118	)		(4,688	)		(13,615	)
State		(160	)		(644	)		(4,935	)
		(1,278	)		(5,332	)		(18,550	)
Total tax benefit	$	(486	)	$	(5,332	)	$	(18,176	)

F-53

FRIENDFINDER NETWORKS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE N — INCOME TAXES (Continued)

A reconciliation between the benefit computed at the U.S. federal statutory rate on the pre-tax loss to the tax benefit included in the consolidated statements of operations follows (in thousands):

	Year Ended December 31,
	2010			2009			2008
Tax benefit at federal statutory rate (35%)	$	15,274		$	16,292		$	22,450
State taxes, net of federal effect		1,552			435			3,208
Impairment of goodwill		—			—			(3,350	)
Net operating loss for which no tax benefit is recognized		(16,679	)		(4,881	)		(4,842	)
Non-deductible penalties including related foreign exchange gain		—			97			1,119
Write off of deferred tax asset related to United Kingdom VAT liability which was eliminated (see Note I)		—			(7,785	)		—
Gain on warrant liability		14			960			—
Other		326			214			(409	)
Tax benefit	$	486		$	5,332		$	18,176

The components of deferred tax assets and liabilities are as follows (in thousands):

	December 31,
	2010			2009
Deferred tax assets:
Net operating loss carryforwards	$	27,424		$	30,430
Allowance for doubtful accounts		894			861
Accrued liability related to VAT		12,264			13,733
Accrued loss related to claim in arbitration		5,200			—
Other		590			427
Gross deferred tax assets		46,372			45,451
Less valuation allowance		(28,627	)		(11,948	)
Net deferred tax assets		17,745			33,503

Deferred tax liabilities:
Trademarks and domain names not subject to amortization		(23,794	)		(25,644	)
Intangible assets subject to amortization		(11,654	)		(19,273	)
Long-term debt		(5,875	)		(10,634	)
Property and equipment, including software		(217	)		(3,222	)
Other		(958	)		(761	)
		(42,498	)		(59,534	)
Net deferred tax liabilities	$	(24,753	)	$	(26,031	)

Amounts recognized in the consolidated balance sheets consist of (in thousands):

	December 31,
	2010			2009
Deferred tax asset — current	$	5,522		$	11,366
Deferred tax liability — non-current		(30,275	)		(37,397	)
Net deferred tax liability	$	(24,753	)	$	(26,031	)

F-54

FRIENDFINDER NETWORKS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE N — INCOME TAXES (Continued)

At December 31, 2010, the Company had net operating loss carryforwards for federal income tax purposes of approximately $69.0 million available to offset future taxable income which expire at various dates from 2024 through 2028. The Company’s ability to utilize approximately $9.0 million of such carryforwards related to the periods prior to the Company’s exit from Chapter 11 reorganization is limited due to changes in the Company’s ownership, as defined by federal tax regulations. In addition, utilization of the remainder of the carryforwards may be limited upon the occurrence of certain further ownership changes, including as a result of an IPO. Realization of the deferred tax assets is dependent on the existence of sufficient taxable income within the carryforward period, including future reversals of taxable temporary differences. The taxable temporary difference related to indefinite-lived trademarks and domain names, which have no tax basis, will reverse when such assets are disposed of or impaired. Because such period is not determinable and, based on available evidence, management was unable to determine that realization of the deferred tax assets was more likely than not, the Company has recorded a valuation allowance against a portion of its deferred tax assets at December 31, 2010 and 2009. As of both dates, approximately $4.8 million of the valuation allowance relates to pre-reorganization and acquired C corporation entities’ net operating loss carryforwards.

The valuation allowance increased $16.7 million in 2010, $2.3 million in 2009 and $4.8 million in 2008.

Effective January 1, 2007, the Company applied the “more-likely-than-not” recognition threshold to all uncertain tax positions which resulted in no unrecognized tax benefits in the accompanying financial statements. As at December 31, 2010, unrecognized tax benefits were not material.

To the extent incurred, the Company classifies interest and penalties accrued on the underpayment of income taxes as interest expense and other expense, respectively.

The Company is no longer subject to federal, state, and local income tax examinations by tax authorities for years ending before 2007. However, to the extent utilized in the future, the Company’s net operating loss carryforwards originating in such years remain subject to examination.

NOTE O — SEGMENT INFORMATION

The Company’s reportable segments consist of Internet and Entertainment. Internet offers features and services that include social networking, online personals, premium content, live interactive videos and other services. Entertainment consists of publishing, licensing and studio production and distribution of original pictorial and video content. For the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively, the Entertainment segment recorded revenue of $741,000, $651,000 and $616,000 from advertising services provided to the Internet segment. Additionally, through December 31, 2008, the Entertainment segment provided the Internet segment with video and pictorial content for which no intersegment revenue was recorded. Effective January 1, 2009, the Entertainment segment provided the Internet segment with video and pictorial content for which $1,560,000 was charged to the Internet segment, correspondingly increasing the revenue of the Entertainment segment for the year ended December 31, 2009. No such content was provided in 2010. Certain corporate expenses and interest expense are not allocated to segments. Segment assets include intangible, fixed, and all others identified with each segment. Unallocated corporate assets consist primarily of cash, certain prepaid items related to indebtedness and deferred tax assets not assigned to one of the segments. Information for the Company’s segments is as follows:

	Year Ended December 31,
	2010		2009		2008
Assets:
Internet	$	506,297	$	522,179	$	568,999
Entertainment		22,399		23,520		26,724
Unallocated corporate		4,121		6,182		4,190
Total	$	532,817	$	551,881	$	599,913

F-55

FRIENDFINDER NETWORKS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE O — SEGMENT INFORMATION (Continued)

	Year Ended December 31,
	2010			2009			2008
Net revenue from external customers:
Internet	$	321,605		$	306,213		$	306,129
Entertainment		24,392			21,479			24,888
Total	$	345,997		$	327,692		$	331,017

Income from operations:
Internet	$	76,142		$	64,962		$	34,345
Entertainment		1,140			(439	)		(17,748	)
Total segment income from operations		77,282			64,523			16,597
Unallocated corporate		(5,547	)		(6,128	)		(9,488	)
Total	$	71,735		$	58,395		$	7,109

Amortization of acquired intangibles and software (included in income from operations):
Internet	$	24,461		$	35,454		$	36,347
Entertainment		—			—			—
Unallocated corporate		—			—			—
Total	$	24,461		$	35,454		$	36,347

Depreciation and other amortization (included in income from operations):
Internet	$	4,527		$	4,587		$	4,052
Entertainment		177			294			450
Unallocated corporate		—			—			—
Total	$	4,704		$	4,881		$	4,502

Impairment of goodwill and other assets (included in income from operations):
Internet	$	—		$	—		$	6,829
Entertainment		4,660			4,000			17,602
Total	$	4,660		$	4,000		$	24,431

Net revenues by service and product is as follows (in thousands):

	Year Ended December 31,
	2010		2009		2008
Internet:
Subscription based service	$	245,174	$	245,015	$	246,978
Pay by usage service		76,321		60,434		56,729
Advertising		110		764		2,422
		321,605		306,213		306,129

F-56

FRIENDFINDER NETWORKS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE O — SEGMENT INFORMATION (Continued)

	Year Ended December 31,
	2010		2009		2008

Entertainment:
Magazine		10,894		12,218		15,581
Video entertainment		10,892		6,441		6,048
Licensing		2,606		2,820		3,259
		24,392		21,479		24,888
Total revenues	$	345,997	$	327,692	$	331,017

	Year Ended December 31,
	2010		2009		2008
Net revenue:
United States	$	178,873	$	177,753	$	192,102
Europe		103,224		97,317		86,797
Canada		17,200		15,364		16,381
Other		46,700		37,258		35,737
Total	$	345,997	$	327,692	$	331,017

Principally all long-lived assets are located in the United States.

NOTE P — COMMITMENTS

Future minimum rental commitments for noncancellable operating leases of office space as of December 31, 2010, are as follows (in thousands):

Year	Operating Leases
2011	$	2,076
2012		2,125
2013		2,125
2014		2,070
2015		1,800
Thereafter		2,217
Total	$	12,413

The above amounts do not include taxes and property operating costs on certain leases. Rent expense amounted to approximately $2,127,000, $2,151,000, and $2,226,000 for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009, and 2008, respectively.

NOTE Q — CONTINGENCIES

(a)

F-57

FRIENDFINDER NETWORKS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE Q — CONTINGENCIES (Continued)

alleged, among other things, that Broadstream entered into a Non-Disclosure Agreement with the Company that required Broadstream’s prior written consent for the Company to knowingly acquire Various or any of its subsidiaries and that such consent was not obtained. On April 7, 2008, Broadstream filed its First Amended Complaint, which added a new cause of action for intentional interference with prospective economic advantage. On February 20, 2009, Broadstream filed its Third Amended Complaint, which dismisses the allegations of breach of fiduciary duty and constructive fraud. The complaint seeks damages which plaintiff alleges to be in excess of $20 million, plus interest, costs and punitive damages. Broadstream later asserted up to $557 million in damages plus punitive damages. On July 20, 2009, the Company entered into an agreement with Broadstream under which, without admitting liability, the Company agreed to pay Broadstream $3.0 million in $1.0 million installments due no later than July 2009, January 2010 and July 2010. Such payments were timely made. The agreement provides that upon the earlier of twelve months after the Company has securities registered under Section 12(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or eighteen months after the effective date of the agreement, but not later than twelve months following such earlier date, Broadstream must choose either to (i) refile its complaint in Federal District Court provided that it first repay the Company the $3.0 million or (ii) demand arbitration. If Broadstream elects arbitration, the parties have agreed that there will be an arbitration award to Broadstream of at least $10.0 million but not more than $47.0 million. Giving consideration of the limitation of the arbitration award in relation to damages sought in litigation, management had not concluded that it was probable that Broadstream would demand arbitration. Accordingly, no loss had been provided for as a result of entering into the agreement. In the event that Broadstream elected arbitration, at such time the Company would recognize a loss in connection with the matter of $13.0 million to $50.0 million.

In December 2010, Broadstream elected arbitration. Accordingly, at December 31, 2010 the Company recognized a loss in connection with the matter of $13.0 million which is included in other non-operating expense, net in the accompanying 2010 consolidated statement of operations. In connection with providing for the loss, the Company recorded a liability to Broadstream of $10.0 million (see Note I). In the event that the liability exceeds $15.0 million (exclusive of $3.0 million the Company already paid to Broadstream), it would constitute an event of default under the agreements governing the New First Lien Notes, Cash Pay Second Lien Notes and Non-Cash Pay Second Lien Notes.

On July 6, 2011, the Company entered into a settlement agreement with Broadstream pursuant to which the arbitration and related litigation and all claims asserted therein were agreed to be dismissed and the Company agreed to pay Broadstream $15 million payable as follows: $8 million no later than July 13, 2011, $5 million no later than September 29, 2011 and $2 million no later than January 2, 2012. As a result of the settlement, the Company will recognize an additional loss of $5 million in the quarter ending June 30, 2011.

(b)

F-58

FRIENDFINDER NETWORKS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE Q — CONTINGENCIES (Continued)

Affirmative Defenses to the Second Amended Complaint on June 25, 2009. On August 14, 2008, Guccione filed a voluntary petition for Chapter 7 Bankruptcy. Guccione filed a dismissal of the bankruptcy proceedings on November 4, 2009. The Court dismissed the bankruptcy action on November 9, 2009. The settlement agreement between Guccione and his judgment creditors assigns all rights to the New York state court action to his judgment creditors. On January 8, 2010, the Company filed an Amended Answer with counterclaims against Guccione and Penthouse Publications Limited for conversion, breach of fiduciary duty, declaratory relief and indemnification. No specific amount of damages has been requested in the counterclaims. On January 27, 2010, Plaintiffs filed a Reply to the Company’s counterclaims. In January and February 2010, certain defendants filed Answers to Plaintiffs’ Second Amended Complaint with cross-claims against the Company for contribution and indemnification. No specific amount of damages has been requested. In February and March 2010, the Company filed its Answer and Affirmative Defenses to the cross-claims. On October 20, 2010, Guccione passed away. As such, the case is stayed pending substitution of his estate as a party. The Company believes it has meritorious defenses to all claims and intends to vigorously defend the lawsuit.

(c)

On November 28, 2006, Antor Media Corporation (“Antor”) filed a complaint against the Company, its subsidiary, General Media Communications, Inc. (“GMCI”), and several non-affiliate media/entertainment defendants in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Texarkana Division, for infringement of a Patent entitled “Method and Apparatus for Transmitting Information Recorded on Information Storage Means from a Central Server to Subscribers via a High Data Rate Digital Telecommunications Network.” No specific amount of damages has been requested. Injunctive relief is also sought. The Company and its subsidiary filed an Answer, Affirmative Defenses and Counterclaims. The United States Patent and Trademark Office (“USPTO”) issued a non-final office action rejecting Antor’s patent claims. Antor filed a response to the office action which added 83 new claims to the original 29 rejected claims. In August 2008, the USPTO issued its final office action sustaining its rejection of the original 29 claims and rejecting the 83 new claims. Antor filed its Petition to Vacate Finality of Office Action on the grounds it introduced new grounds for the rejection. Based on the final office action, the Company, GMCI and all other defendants filed an expedited motion to stay the case. In December 2008, pursuant to an order granting a re-examination proceeding, the USPTO issued a non-final office action again rejecting the original 29 claims and the new 83 claims. In February 2009, Antor filed a response in which it agreed to cancel the 83 new claims previously proposed. On May 11, 2009, the Court entered an Order granting Defendants’ Motion to Stay as modified. On May 22, 2009, the defendants accepted the terms of the Court’s proposed Stipulation regarding the use of prior art at trial and filed their Stipulation. On June 5, 2009, the USPTO issued a Final Office Action rejecting all of the Plaintiff’s claims. Plaintiff filed an appeal on July 7, 2009 and an appellate brief on October 8, 2009. On February 18, 2010, the USPTO filed an answer brief. On October 21, 2010, the USPTO Board of Patent Appeals entered an order affirming the rejection of Antor’s claims. On December 21, 2010, Antor filed a request for rehearing which was denied in March 2011. The case will remain stayed pending the appeal.

(d)

(e)

In or about March 2009, a complaint was filed against the Company’s subsidiary FriendFinder California, Inc. and other defendants in the State Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles in connection with their advertising on a free adult content website run by a third party known as Bright Imperial Limited. In April 2009, Various and the Company were added as defendants. The complaint alleges that the defendants aided and abetted Bright Imperial Limited in engaging in below cost competition and unlawful use of “loss leaders”

F-59

FRIENDFINDER NETWORKS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE Q — CONTINGENCIES (Continued)

in violation of California law by providing free, apparently professionally produced adult content. The plaintiff is seeking $10.0 million in damages, trebled to at least $30.0 million, plus injunctive relief and attorneys’ fees. On May 8, 2009, the Court denied the plaintiff’s request for an Order to Show Cause concerning its request for preliminary injunction, citing insufficient evidence among other factors. On May 26, 2009, the Company filed an “Anti-SLAPP” Motion to Strike the Complaint along with a Motion to Dismiss the claims in the Complaint. On or about July 24, 2009, after the Court granted the Anti-SLAPP motion the plaintiff then stipulated to the form of an Order on the Anti-SLAPP motion that finds in favor of the Company, effectively terminating the case. On August 10, 2009, plaintiff filed his Notice of Appeal to the California Court of Appeal. On January 26, 2011, the California Appellate Court affirmed the trial court’s ruling in the Company’s favor.

(f)

On November 4, 2008, Balthaser Online, Inc. filed a lawsuit for patent infringement against the Company among other defendants, in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Texarkana Division, seeking unspecified monetary damages as well as injunctive relief. The complaint alleged infringement of Patent entitled “Methods, Systems, and Processes for the Design and Creation of Rich-Media Applications via the Internet.” The plaintiff filed a first amended complaint naming Various, Inc., FriendFinder California Inc. and Global Alphabet, Inc. as defendants on January 15, 2009. On or about August 28, 2009, pursuant to local rule, the Company served its invalidity contentions. On September 15, 2009, the Court granted the Company’s motion to transfer the case to the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The lawsuit was settled on November 30, 2010 for an immaterial amount and the action was dismissed with prejudice.

(g)

In or about December 2007, Spark Network Services, Inc. served Various with a complaint for patent infringement seeking unspecified monetary damages as well as injunctive relief. The complaint alleges infringement of a U.S. Patent entitled “System for Data Collection and Matching Compatible Profiles.” Various moved for a stay of the federal case due to the USPTO’s re-examination of the patent at issue and the Federal Court granted the stay. The USPTO issued a final rejection of the patent at issue on September 18, 2009, and the plaintiff filed a notice of appeal on December 17, 2009. In March 2010, the parties entered into a settlement agreement resolving the case and the Federal action was dismissed with prejudice. The settlement did not have a material effect on the Company’s financial statements.

(h)

On November 5, 2009, Joao Control and Monitoring Systems of Texas, LLC filed a patent infringement lawsuit in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas against the Company and its indirect wholly-owned subsidiary Streamray Inc., and a number of other unrelated adult entertainment companies, alleging infringement of a patent entitled “Monitoring Apparatus and Method” and seeking unspecified monetary damages as well as injunctive relief. The lawsuit was served on the Company and Streamray Inc. on November 12, 2009. In or about June 2010 the Company filed a motion related to the propriety of the forum and Streamray Inc. answered the complaint. On or around July 2010, the parties entered into a settlement agreement resolving the case and the action was dismissed with prejudice. The settlement did not have a material effect on the Company’s financial statements.

(i)

(j)

On May 19, 2009 representatives for Summit Trading Limited (“Summit”) sent a letter to the Company’s outside legal counsel, alleging that the Company, Interactive Brand Development, Inc., (an owner of the Company’s Series B Common Stock) and entities affiliated with two of the Company’s principal stockholders

F-60

FRIENDFINDER NETWORKS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE Q — CONTINGENCIES (Continued)

defrauded Summit of financial compensation for services provided to the Company’s predecessor entity, General Media, Inc. Among the claims, Summit asserted bad faith, breach of contract and fraud by the Company’s management and the Company, and claimed that it is owed an equity interest in the Company, as well as compensatory, punitive and exemplary damages in excess of $500 million. Management believes that the allegations stated in the letter are vague and lack factual basis and merit. Summit has not taken any legal action against the Company. Should Summit take legal action, the Company would vigorously defend the lawsuit.

(k)

(l)

On April 13, 2011, Facebook, Inc., or Facebook, filed a complaint against the Company and certain of its subsidiaries in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, alleging trademark infringement with regard to the use of the terms “face book of sex”. The Complaint contains causes of action for: trademark dilution, false designation of origin, trademark infringement, violation of the Anti-Cybersquatting Consumer Protection Act, and for unfair competition. The Complaint also seeks a declaratory judgment that Facebook’s use of “friend finder” on its website is a descriptive fair use that does not infringe Various’ trademark rights in the “FRIENDFINDER” mark. No specific amount of damages has been sought. However, the Complaint requests monetary relief, injunctive relief, punitive damages, cancellation of the “FRIENDFINDER” marks, attorneys’ fees, other equitable relief, and costs among other things. The Company intends to vigorously defend the lawsuit.

The Company currently is a party to other legal proceedings and claims. While management presently believes that the ultimate outcome of these proceedings, including the ones discussed above, individually and in the aggregate, will not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial position, cash flows, or overall trends in results of operations, litigation and arbitration is subject to inherent uncertainties and unfavorable rulings could occur. An unfavorable ruling could include monetary damages or, in cases for which injunctive relief is sought, an injunction prohibiting the Company from selling one or more products or services. Were an unfavorable ruling to occur there exists the possibility of a material adverse impact on the business or results of operations for the period in which the ruling occurs or future periods. Other than as disclosed above, the Company is unable to estimate the possible loss or range of loss which may result from pending legal proceedings or claims.

NOTE R — RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

In October 2004, the Company entered into a separate management agreement with an entity controlled by the Company’s principal stockholders whereby certain management services are to be performed by these principal stockholders as designated by the board of directors of the Company. The agreement was for a term of five years with an annual fee of $500,000. In October 2009, the management agreement was amended to extend the term until the consummation of an IPO and the annual fee was increased to $1,000,000 effective November 1, 2010. In addition, the agreement provides that the managers may participate in the Company’s future bonus pool and stock option plans. Management fees, which are included in general and administrative expenses, amounted to approximately $583,000, $500,000 and $500,000 for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008 respectively.

F-61

FRIENDFINDER NETWORKS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE R — RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS (Continued)

The Company has also entered into a lease agreement for rental of office space from a company controlled by the Company’s principal stockholders. The lease, which commenced on January 1, 2005, was for a period of five years and provided for annual rent of approximately $58,000 plus operating expenses. On December 18, 2009, the lease was extended through June 2010 at approximately $5,000 per month. On December 1, 2010 a new lease agreement was entered for a period of five years providing for annual rent of approximately $61,000 per year with the annual base rent and expenses not to exceed $150,000 per year. Total rent expense under this lease agreement was approximately $161,000, $120,000 and $118,000 for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively.

In September 2007, the Company entered into consulting agreements with two entities controlled by two of the Company’s stockholders who were former owners of Various. The agreements specify payments of approximately $19,000 per month to each entity. Both agreements were for one year and thereafter renewed automatically each month until either party terminated the agreement. As of October 27, 2010, the agreements were amended so that the Company could not terminate the agreements prior to March 31, 2013. For each of the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008, the Company paid an aggregate of approximately $462,000, under such agreements which is included in general and administrative expenses.

On October 8, 2009, the Company agreed to pay compensation to the Company’s Chairman and the Company’s Chief Executive Officer for options granted by such executives to the former owners of Various and to a holder of common and preferred shares on an aggregate of 1,147,964 of the Company’s common shares owned by the executives (see Note J(f) and L). Subject to the consummation of a public or private offering of any equity or debt securities of the Company which occurs after an IPO, each executive is to receive compensation equal to 37.5% of the IPO price times 573,982, representing the number of common shares on which options were granted. Subject to the trading price of the Company’s stock, as defined, being equal to or greater than 50% of the IPO price, the Company shall pay one-third of the total compensation on the first business day of the first full calendar quarter following the consummation of the equity or debt offering referred to above, and one-third of the compensation on the first business day of each of the next two calendar quarters. In the event of a Change in Control Event, as defined, the Company shall pay any remaining unpaid amount.

NOTE S — EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS

FriendFinder has a defined contribution plan that combines an employee deferred compensation 401(k) plan with a profit-sharing plan under which FriendFinder may make contributions solely at its own discretion. Substantially all employees may participate in the plan. FriendFinder did not make any contributions to the plan for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008.

Various has a defined contribution plan under Section 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code covering all full-time employees which provides for matching contributions by Various, as defined in the plan. Contributions made by Various to the plan for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008 were approximately $597,000, $579,000 and $491,000 respectively.

On March 23, 2009, the Company’s board of directors approved a 2009 Restricted Stock Plan (the “Plan”) which becomes effective upon the consummation of an IPO. The aggregate number of shares of restricted stock that may be granted under the Plan is limited to one percent of the fully-diluted equity of the Company on the date that an IPO is consummated. The compensation committee of the board of directors is charged with administering the Plan and all directors, employees and consultants of FriendFinder or of any subsidiary are eligible to receive restricted stock under the Plan. Restricted stock granted under the Plan will generally vest on the third anniversary of the grant date, subject to the recipient’s continued service. Restricted shares will also vest prior to the third anniversary of the grant date if the recipient’s employment has been terminated under certain conditions. Upon the termination of a recipient’s employment, unvested shares of restricted stock will be subject to repurchase by the

F-62

FRIENDFINDER NETWORKS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE S — EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS (Continued)

Company at a price of $2.00 per share. Prior to vesting, the restricted shares may not be sold, assigned, transferred or pledged by the recipient.

NOTE T — INITIAL PUBLIC OFFERING (“IPO”) AND RELATED EVENTS

In connection with the consummation of the IPO (i) 378,579 outstanding shares of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock were converted into 428,668 shares of common stock (ii) all of the outstanding shares of Series B Convertible Preferred Stock were converted into 8,444,853 shares of common stock (iii) 1,806,860 shares of Series B Common Stock were exchanged for 1,806,860 shares of common stock (iv) 5,734,918 shares of common stock were issued upon exercise of outstanding warrants, and (v) the Non-Cash Pay Second Lien Notes became convertible into 8,310,763 shares of common stock at the IPO price of $10 per share.

As described in Note J(b), in the event of an IPO, the net proceeds must be used to redeem the New First Lien Notes and Cash Pay Second Lien Notes pro rata at 110% of principal plus accrued and unpaid interest. On May 19, 2011, the Company redeemed $39,541,000 principal amount of notes from the net proceeds of the IPO and incurred a loss on extinguishment of debt.

F-63

$235,331,887 14% of Senior Secured Notes due 2013
$10,630,667 14% of Cash Pay Secured Notes due 2013
$344,469,891 11.5% of Convertible Non-Cash Pay Secured Notes due 2014
31,007,466 Shares of Common Stock

PROSPECTUS
, 2011

PART II
INFORMATION NOT REQUIRED IN PROSPECTUS

Item 13. Other Expenses of Issuance and Distribution

		Amount
Securities and Exchange Commission Registration Fee	$	72,923.63	⁽¹⁾
Legal Fees and Expenses		50,000
Accounting Fees and Expenses		25,000
Miscellaneous Expenses		15,000
Total	$	162,923.63

All amounts are estimates, other than the SEC’s registration fee.

We have paid the SEC Registration Fee and are paying all other net expenses of the offering listed above. No portion of these expenses will be borne by the selling stockholders. The selling stockholders, however, will pay all underwriting discounts and selling commissions, if any.

(1)

Pursuant to Rule 457(p) of the Securities Act, we offset $58,705.58, which was previously paid in connection with a Registration Statement on Form S-4 filed on August 1, 2011, as amended, and withdrawn on October 17, 2011, against the total amount of the registration fee and simultaneously paid the difference in connection with our filing of the Form S-1 Registration Statement on October 18, 2011. Therefore, no registration fee is necessary for this Amendment to the Registration Statement.

Item 14. Indemnification of Directors and Officers

Section 78.7502 of the Nevada Revised Statutes empowers a Nevada corporation to indemnify any person who was or is a party or is threatened to be made a party to any threatened, pending or completed action, suit or proceeding, whether civil, criminal, administrative or investigative (other than an action by or in the right of such corporation), by reason of the fact that such person is or was a director, officer, employee or agent of such corporation, or is or was serving at the request of such corporation as a director, officer, employee or agent of another corporation or enterprise. The indemnity may include expenses (including attorneys’ fees), judgments, fines and amounts paid in settlement actually and reasonably incurred by such person in connection with such action, suit or proceeding, provided that such person (i) is not liable for breaching his or her duties as a director or officer of the corporation, where such breach involved intentional misconduct, fraud or a knowing violation of law or (ii) acted in good faith and in a manner he or she reasonably believed to be in or not opposed to the corporation’s best interests, and, for criminal proceedings, had no reasonable cause to believe his or her conduct was unlawful. A Nevada corporation may indemnify any person against expenses (including attorneys’ fees) in connection with the defense or settlement of an action by or in the right of the corporation under the same conditions, except that no indemnification is permitted without judicial approval if the officer or director is adjudged to be liable to the corporation. Where a director, officer, employee or agent is successful on the merits or otherwise in the defense of any action referred to above, the corporation must indemnify him or her against the expenses which such officer or director actually and reasonably incurred in connection with the defense.

FriendFinder Networks Inc.

Our amended and restated bylaws contain a provision providing for indemnification of our officers and directors. Our amended and restated bylaws further require us to pay advance expenses as incurred by an officer or director in connection with proceedings against them for which they may be indemnified.

We have entered into indemnification agreements with our directors and certain officers. Under the terms of the indemnification agreements, we are required to indemnify the directors against specified liabilities arising out of their services to us. The indemnification agreements require us to indemnify each director and officer to the fullest extent permitted by law and to advance certain expenses incurred by the directors and officers. The indemnification agreements provide limitations on the directors’ and officers’ rights to indemnification in certain circumstances.

In addition, we have obtained directors’ and officers’ insurance that covers our directors and officers for specific liabilities, including for coverage for public securities matters.

II-1

Interactive Network, Inc. and FriendFinder Ventures Inc.

The bylaws of Interactive Network, Inc. and the bylaws of FriendFinder Ventures Inc. each provide that the corporation shall indemnify its officers and directors under certain circumstances, including those circumstances in which indemnification would otherwise be discretionary, and that the corporation is required to advance expenses to its officers and directors as incurred in connection with proceedings against them for which they may be indemnified.

Streamray Inc.

The bylaws of Streamray Inc. provide for the indemnification of its directors and officers against legal expenses, claims and liabilities, except with respect to an action by or in the right of the corporation. Indemnification pursuant to Streamray Inc.’s bylaws must be authorized in the specific case upon a determination made by (i) the stockholders, (ii) a majority vote of a quorum of directors not party to the relevant action, suit or proceeding, or (iii) under certain specified circumstances, independent legal counsel. No specific provision is made for the advancement of expenses as they are incurred.

Registrants incorporated as corporations in Delaware

Section 145(a) of the Delaware General Corporation Law (the “DGCL”) provides that a Delaware corporation may indemnify any person who was or is a party or is threatened to be made a party to any threatened, pending or completed action, suit or proceeding, whether civil, criminal, administrative or investigative, other than an action by or in the right of the corporation, by reason of the fact that such person is or was a director, officer, employee or agent of the corporation, or is or was serving at the request of the corporation as a director, officer, employee or agent of another corporation, partnership, joint venture, trust or other enterprise, against expenses (including attorneys’ fees), judgments, fines and amounts paid in settlement actually and reasonably incurred by the person in connection with such action, suit or proceeding if the person acted in good faith and in a manner the person reasonably believed to be in or not opposed to the best interests of the corporation, and, with respect to any criminal action or proceeding, had no reasonable cause to believe the person’s conduct was unlawful.

Section 145(b) of the DGCL provides that a Delaware corporation may indemnify any person who was or is a party or is threatened to be made a party to any threatened, pending or completed action or suit by or in the right of the corporation to procure a judgment in its favor by reason of the fact that such person acted in any of the capacities set forth above, against expenses (including attorneys’ fees) actually and reasonably incurred by such person in connection with the defense or settlement of such action or suit if the person acted in good faith and in a manner the person reasonably believed to be in or not opposed to the best interests of the corporation, except that no indemnification shall be made in respect of any claim, issue or matter as to which such person shall have been adjudged to be liable to the corporation, unless and only to the extent that the Court of Chancery or the court in which such action or suit was brought shall determine upon application that, despite the adjudication of liability but in view of all the circumstances of the case, such person is fairly and reasonably entitled to indemnity for such expenses which the court shall deem proper.

Further subsections of DGCL Section 145 provide that:

•

to the extent a present or former director or officer of a corporation has been successful on the merits or otherwise in the defense of any action, suit or proceeding referred to in subsections (a) and (b) of Section 145 or in the defense of any claim, issue or matter therein, such person shall be indemnified against expenses, including attorneys’ fees, actually and reasonably incurred by such person in connection therewith;

•

the indemnification and advancement of expenses provided for pursuant to Section 145 shall not be deemed exclusive of any other rights to which those seeking indemnification or advancement of expenses may be entitled under any bylaw, agreement, vote of stockholders or disinterested directors or otherwise; and

•

the corporation shall have the power to purchase and maintain insurance on behalf of any person who is or was a director, officer, employee or agent of the corporation, or is or was serving at the request of the corporation as a director, officer, employee or agent of another corporation, partnership, joint venture, trust or other enterprise, against any liability asserted against such person and incurred by such person in any

II-2

such capacity, or arising out of such person’s status as such, whether or not the corporation would have the power to indemnify such person against such liability under Section 145.

As used in this Item 20, the term “proceeding” means any threatened, pending, or completed action, suit, or proceeding, whether or not by or in the right of Registrant, and whether civil, criminal, administrative, investigative or otherwise.

Section 145 of the DGCL makes provision for the indemnification of officers and directors in terms sufficiently broad to indemnify officers and directors of each of the registrants incorporated in Delaware under certain circumstances from liabilities (including reimbursement for expenses incurred) arising under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Act”). Each of the registrants incorporated in Delaware may, in their discretion, similarly indemnify their employees and agents. Under Section 102(b)(7) of the DGCL, a corporation may relieve its directors from personal liability to such corporation or its stockholders for monetary damages for any breach of their fiduciary duty as directors except (i) for a breach of the duty of loyalty, (ii) for failure to act in good faith, (iii) for intentional misconduct or knowing violation of law, (iv) for willful or negligent violations of certain provisions in the DGCL imposing certain requirements with respect to stock repurchases, redemptions and dividends, or (v) for any transactions from which the director derived an improper personal benefit.

Argus Payments Inc.

The bylaws of Argus Payments Inc. provide that Argus Payments Inc. shall indemnify and hold harmless, any person who was or is made or is threatened to be made a party or is otherwise involved in any action, suit or proceeding, whether civil, criminal, administrative or investigative, by reason of the fact that such person, or a person for whom such person is the legal representative, is or was a director or officer of Argus Payments Inc. or, while a director or officer of Argus Payments Inc., is or was serving at the request of Argus Payments Inc. as a director, officer, employee or agent of another corporation or of a partnership, joint venture, trust, or other enterprise, including service with respect to employee benefit plans, whether the basis of such proceeding is alleged action or inaction in an official capacity or any other capacity while serving as a director, officer, employee or agent. Argus Payments Inc. shall pay the expenses (including attorneys’ fees) incurred by such person in defending any proceeding in advance of its final disposition, provided, however, that, to the extent required by law, such payment of expenses in advance of the final disposition of the proceeding shall be made only upon receipt of an undertaking by such person to repay all amounts advanced if it should be ultimately determined that such person is not entitled to be indemnified. Argus Payments Inc.’s bylaws further provide that such right of indemnification shall not be exclusive of any right to which any such person may be entitled as a matter of law.

Blue Hen Group Inc.

The bylaws of Blue Hen Group Inc. provide that Blue Hen Group Inc. shall indemnify and hold harmless, any person who was or is made or is threatened to be made a party or is otherwise involved in any action, suit or proceeding, whether civil, criminal, administrative or investigative, by reason of the fact that such person, or a person for whom such person is the legal representative, is or was a director or officer of Blue Hen Group Inc. or, while a director or officer of Blue Hen Group Inc., is or was serving at the request of Blue Hen Group Inc. as a director, officer, employee or agent of another corporation or of a partnership, joint venture, trust, or other enterprise, including service with respect to employee benefit plans, whether the basis of such proceeding is alleged action or inaction in an official capacity or any other capacity while serving as a director, officer, employee or agent. Blue Hen Group Inc. shall pay the expenses (including attorneys’ fees) incurred by such person in defending any proceeding in advance of its final disposition, provided, however, that, to the extent required by law, such payment of expenses in advance of the final disposition of the proceeding shall be made only upon receipt of an undertaking by such person to repay all amounts advanced if it should be ultimately determined that such person is not entitled to be indemnified. Blue Hen Group Inc.’s bylaws further provide that such right of indemnification shall not be exclusive of any right to which any such person may be entitled as a matter of law.

Flash Jigo Corp.

The bylaws of Flash Jigo Corp. provide that Flash Jigo Corp. shall indemnify and hold harmless, any person who was or is made or is threatened to be made a party or is otherwise involved in any action, suit or proceeding,

II-3

whether civil, criminal, administrative or investigative, by reason of the fact that such person, or a person for whom such person is the legal representative, is or was a director or officer of Flash Jigo Corp. or, while a director or officer of Flash Jigo Corp., is or was serving at the request of Flash Jigo Corp. as a director, officer, employee or agent of another corporation or of a partnership, joint venture, trust, or other enterprise, including service with respect to employee benefit plans, whether the basis of such proceeding is alleged action or inaction in an official capacity or any other capacity while serving as a director, officer, employee or agent. Flash Jigo Corp. shall pay the expenses (including attorneys’ fees) incurred by such person in defending any proceeding in advance of its final disposition, provided, however, that, to the extent required by law, such payment of expenses in advance of the final disposition of the proceeding shall be made only upon receipt of an undertaking by such person to repay all amounts advanced if it should be ultimately determined that such person is not entitled to be indemnified. Flash Jigo Corp.’s bylaws further provide that such right of indemnification shall not be exclusive of any right to which any such person may be entitled as a matter of law.

General Media Art Holding, Inc.

The bylaws of General Media Art Holding, Inc. provide that it shall indemnify any director, officer, employee or agent of the corporation to the fullest extent permitted by applicable law.

GMI On-Line Ventures, Ltd.

The bylaws of GMI On-Line Ventures, Ltd. provide that it shall indemnify all persons to the fullest extent permitted, and in the manner provided, by the DGCL.

PerfectMatch Inc. (f/k/a Goldenrod Spear Inc.)

The bylaws of PerfectMatch Inc. provide that PerfectMatch Inc. shall indemnify and hold harmless, any person who was or is made or is threatened to be made a party or is otherwise involved in any action, suit or proceeding, whether civil, criminal, administrative or investigative, by reason of the fact that such person, or a person for whom such person is the legal representative, is or was a director or officer of PerfectMatch Inc. or, while a director or officer of PerfectMatch Inc., is or was serving at the request of PerfectMatch Inc. as a director, officer, employee or agent of another corporation or of a partnership, joint venture, trust, or other enterprise, including service with respect to employee benefit plans, whether the basis of such proceeding is alleged action or inaction in an official capacity or any other capacity while serving as a director, officer, employee or agent. PerfectMatch Inc. shall pay the expenses (including attorneys’ fees) incurred by such person in defending any proceeding in advance of its final disposition, provided, however, that, to the extent required by law, such payment of expenses in advance of the final disposition of the proceeding shall be made only upon receipt of an undertaking by such person to repay all amounts advanced if it should be ultimately determined that such person is not entitled to be indemnified. PerfectMatch Inc.’s bylaws further provide that such right of indemnification shall not be exclusive of any right to which any such person may be entitled as a matter of law.

Magnolia Blossom Inc.

The bylaws of Magnolia Blossom Inc. provide that Magnolia Blossom Inc. shall indemnify and hold harmless, any person who was or is made or is threatened to be made a party or is otherwise involved in any action, suit or proceeding, whether civil, criminal, administrative or investigative, by reason of the fact that such person, or a person for whom such person is the legal representative, is or was a director or officer of Magnolia Blossom Inc. or, while a director or officer of Magnolia Blossom Inc., is or was serving at the request of Magnolia Blossom Inc. as a director, officer, employee or agent of another corporation or of a partnership, joint venture, trust, or other enterprise, including service with respect to employee benefit plans, whether the basis of such proceeding is alleged action or inaction in an official capacity or any other capacity while serving as a director, officer, employee or agent. Magnolia Blossom Inc. shall pay the expenses (including attorneys’ fees) incurred by such person in defending any proceeding in advance of its final disposition, provided, however, that, to the extent required by law, such payment of expenses in advance of the final disposition of the proceeding shall be made only upon receipt of an undertaking by such person to repay all amounts advanced if it should be ultimately determined that such person

II-4

is not entitled to be indemnified. Magnolia Blossom Inc.’s bylaws further provide that such right of indemnification shall not be exclusive of any right to which any such person may be entitled as a matter of law.

PMGI Holdings Inc.

The bylaws of PMGI Holdings Inc. provide that PMGI Holdings Inc. shall indemnify its officers and directors under certain circumstances, including those circumstances in which indemnification would otherwise be discretionary, and PMGI Holdings Inc. is required to advance expenses to its officers and directors as incurred in connection with proceedings against them for which they may be indemnified.

XVHUB Group Inc. (f/k/a Giant Swallowtail Inc.)

The bylaws of XVHUB Group Inc. provide that XVHUB Group Inc. shall indemnify and hold harmless, any person who was or is made or is threatened to be made a party or is otherwise involved in any action, suit or proceeding, whether civil, criminal, administrative or investigative, by reason of the fact that such person, or a person for whom such person is the legal representative, is or was a director or officer of XVHUB Group Inc. or, while a director or officer of XVHUB Group Inc., is or was serving at the request of XVHUB Group Inc. as a director, officer, employee or agent of another corporation or of a partnership, joint venture, trust, or other enterprise, including service with respect to employee benefit plans, whether the basis of such proceeding is alleged action or inaction in an official capacity or any other capacity while serving as a director, officer, employee or agent. XVHUB Group Inc. shall pay the expenses (including attorneys’ fees) incurred by such person in defending any proceeding in advance of its final disposition, provided, however, that, to the extent required by law, such payment of expenses in advance of the final disposition of the proceeding shall be made only upon receipt of an undertaking by such person to repay all amounts advanced if it should be ultimately determined that such person is not entitled to be indemnified. XVHUB Group Inc.’s bylaws further provide that such right of indemnification shall not be exclusive of any right to which any such person may be entitled as a matter of law.

Registrants incorporated as a corporation in California

Section 317 of the California General Corporation Law (“CAGCL”) authorizes a court to award, or a California corporation to grant, indemnity to officers, directors and other agents for reasonable expenses incurred in connection with the defense or settlement of an action by or in the right of the corporation or in a proceeding by reason of the fact that the person is or was an officer, director, or agent of the corporation. Indemnity is available where the person who was or is a party to a proceeding or action acted in good faith and in a manner the person reasonably believed to be in the best interests of the corporation and its shareholders and, with respect to criminal actions, had no reasonable cause to believe his conduct was unlawful. To the extent a corporation’s officer, director or agent is successful on the merits in the defense of any proceeding or any claim, issue or related matter described in Section 317(b) or (c) of the CAGCL, that person shall be indemnified against expenses actually and reasonably incurred. Under Section 317 of the CAGCL, expenses incurred in defending any proceeding may be advanced by the corporation prior to the final disposition of the proceeding upon receipt of any undertaking by or on behalf of the officer, director, employee or agent to repay that amount if it is ultimately determined that the person is not entitled to be indemnified. Indemnifications are to be made by a majority vote of a quorum of disinterested directors, by written opinion of independent legal counsel if a quorum of disinterested directors is not obtainable, or by approval of the shareholders with the shares owned by persons to be indemnified not being entitled to vote thereon, or by the court in which such proceeding is or was pending upon application made by either the corporation, the agent, the attorney, or other person rendering services in connection with the defense. The indemnification provided by Section 317 is not exclusive.

Pursuant to Section 204 of the CAGCL, a corporation may set forth a provision in its articles of incorporation authorizing the indemnification of agents in excess of that expressly permitted by Section 317 of the CAGCL for such agents’ breach of duty to the corporations and its stockholders, provided, however, that the provision may not provide for indemnification of any agent for any acts or omissions or transactions from which a director may not be relieved of liability as set forth in Section 204(a) or as to circumstances in which indemnity is expressly prohibited by Section 317 of the CAGCL.

II-5

Fierce Wombat Games Inc. (f/k/a Big Ego Games Inc.)

The bylaws of Fierce Wombat Games Inc. provide that Fierce Wombat Games Inc. has power to indemnify any person who is or was a director, officer, employee, or other agent of the corporation or of its predecessor, or is or was serving as such of another corporation, partnership, joint venture, trust or other enterprise, at the request of the corporation against expenses, judgments, fines, settlements, and other amounts actually and reasonably incurred in connection with any threatened, pending, or completed action or proceeding, whether civil, criminal or administrative, as provided in Section 317 of the CAGL.

Big Island Technology Group, Inc.

The bylaws of Big Island Technology Group, Inc. provide that Big Island Technology Group, Inc. has power to indemnify any person who is or was a director, officer, employee, or other agent of the corporation or of its predecessor, or is or was serving as such of another corporation, partnership, joint venture, trust or other enterprise, at the request of the corporation against expenses, judgments, fines, settlements, and other amounts actually and reasonably incurred in connection with any threatened, pending, or completed action or proceeding, whether civil, criminal or administrative, as provided in Section 317 of the CAGL.

Confirm ID, Inc.

The bylaws of Confirm ID, Inc. provide that Confirm ID, Inc. has power to indemnify any person who is or was a director, officer, employee, or other agent of the corporation or of its predecessor, or is or was serving as such of another corporation, partnership, joint venture, trust or other enterprise, at the request of the corporation against expenses, judgments, fines, settlements, and other amounts actually and reasonably incurred in connection with any threatened, pending, or completed action or proceeding, whether civil, criminal or administrative, as provided in Section 317 of the CAGL.

Danni Ashe, Inc.

The bylaws of Dannie Ashe, Inc. provide that the corporation shall, to the maximum extent and in the manner permitted in the CAGCL, indemnify each of its directors and officers against expenses, judgments, fines, settlements and other amounts actually and reasonably incurred in connection with any proceeding arising by reason of the fact that such person is or was an agent of the corporation. A “director” or an “officer” of the corporation is defined as: (i) any person who is or was a director or officer of the corporation; (ii) who is or was serving at the request of the corporation as a director or officer of another corporation, partnership, joint venture, trust or other enterprise; or (iii) who was a director or officer of the corporation which was a predecessor corporation of the corporation or of another enterprise at the request of such predecessor corporation. The expenses incurred in defending any civil or criminal action or proceeding for which indemnification is mandated pursuant to the bylaws shall be paid by the corporation in advance of the final disposition of such action or proceeding upon receipt of an undertaking by or on behalf of the indemnified party to repay such amount if it shall ultimately be determined that the indemnified party is not entitled to be indemnified as authorized by the bylaws.

Fastcupid, Inc.

The bylaws of Fastcupid, Inc. provide that Fastcupid, Inc. has power to indemnify any person who is or was a director, officer, employee, or other agent of the corporation or of its predecessor, or is or was serving as such of another corporation, partnership, joint venture, trust or other enterprise, at the request of the corporation against expenses, judgments, fines, settlements, and other amounts actually and reasonably incurred in connection with any threatened, pending, or completed action or proceeding, whether civil, criminal or administrative, as provided in Section 317 of the CAGL.

FriendFinder California Inc.

The bylaws of FriendFinder California Inc. provide that the corporation shall, to the maximum extent and in the manner specified in the CAGCL, indemnify each of its directors against expenses, judgments, fines, settlements and other amounts actually and reasonably incurred in connection with any proceeding arising by reason of the

II-6

fact that such person is or was a director of the corporation. The corporation shall have the power to advance expenses incurred in defending any proceeding prior to the disposition of the proceeding upon receipt of an undertaking by or on behalf of the director to repay the amount if it shall be ultimately determined that the person is not entitled to indemnification under the CAGL. The corporation shall also, to the extent and in the manner specified in the CAGL, have the power to indemnify each of its agents (other than directors for whom indemnification is mandatory as described above) against expenses, judgments, fines, settlements and other amounts actually and reasonably incurred in connection with any proceeding arising by reason of the fact that such person is or was an agent of the corporation. The corporation shall have the power to advance expenses incurred in defending any proceeding prior to the disposition of the proceeding upon receipt of an undertaking by or on behalf of the agent to repay that amount if it shall be determined that the person is not entitled to indemnification under the CAGL. The indemnification provided in the bylaws of the corporation are not deemed to be exclusive of any additional rights to which an agent may be entitled under any law, agreement, vote of shareholders, or disinterested directors.

FRNK Technology Group

The bylaws of FRNK Technology Group provide that FRNK Technology Group shall indemnify the directors and officers of the corporation to the fullest extent not prohibited by the CAGL.

Global Alphabet, Inc.

The bylaws of Global Alphabet, Inc. provide that Global Alphabet, Inc. has power to indemnify any person who is or was a director, officer, employee, or other agent of the corporation or of its predecessor, or is or was serving as such of another corporation, partnership, joint venture, trust or other enterprise, at the request of the corporation against expenses, judgments, fines, settlements, and other amounts actually and reasonably incurred in connection with any threatened, pending, or completed action or proceeding, whether civil, criminal or administrative, as provided in Section 317 of the CAGL.

Medley.com Incorporated

The bylaws of Medley.com Incorporated provide that Medley.com Incorporated has power to indemnify any person who is or was a director, officer, employee, or other agent of the corporation or of its predecessor, or is or was serving as such of another corporation, partnership, joint venture, trust or other enterprise, at the request of the corporation against expenses, judgments, fines, settlements, and other amounts actually and reasonably incurred in connection with any threatened, pending, or completed action or proceeding, whether civil, criminal or administrative, as provided in Section 317 of the CAGL.

NAFT News Corporation

The bylaws of NAFT News Corporation provide that NAFT News Corporation has power to indemnify any person who is or was a director, officer, employee, or other agent of the corporation or of its predecessor, or is or was serving as such of another corporation, partnership, joint venture, trust or other enterprise, at the request of the corporation against expenses, judgments, fines, settlements, and other amounts actually and reasonably incurred in connection with any threatened, pending, or completed action or proceeding, whether civil, criminal or administrative, as provided in Section 317 of the CAGL.

Playtime Gaming Inc.

The bylaws of Playtime Gaming Inc. provide that Playtime Gaming Inc. has power to indemnify any person who is or was a director, officer, employee, or other agent of the corporation or of its predecessor, or is or was serving as such of another corporation, partnership, joint venture, trust or other enterprise, at the request of the corporation against expenses, judgments, fines, settlements, and other amounts actually and reasonably incurred in connection with any threatened, pending, or completed action or proceeding, whether civil, criminal or administrative, as provided in Section 317 of the CAGL.

II-7

PPM Technology Group, Inc.

The bylaws of PPM Technology Group, Inc. provide that PPM Technology Group, Inc. has power to indemnify any person who is or was a director, officer, employee, or other agent of the corporation or of its predecessor, or is or was serving as such of another corporation, partnership, joint venture, trust or other enterprise, at the request of the corporation against expenses, judgments, fines, settlements, and other amounts actually and reasonably incurred in connection with any threatened, pending, or completed action or proceeding, whether civil, criminal or administrative, as provided in Section 317 of the CAGL.

Sharkfish, Inc.

The bylaws of Sharkfish, Inc. provide that Sharkfish, Inc. has power to indemnify any person who is or was a director, officer, employee, or other agent of the corporation or of its predecessor, or is or was serving as such of another corporation, partnership, joint venture, trust or other enterprise, at the request of the corporation against expenses, judgments, fines, settlements, and other amounts actually and reasonably incurred in connection with any threatened, pending, or completed action or proceeding, whether civil, criminal or administrative, as provided in Section 317 of the CAGL.

Streamray Studios Inc.

The bylaws of Streamray Studios Inc. provide that Streamray Studios Inc. has power to indemnify any person who is or was a director, officer, employee, or other agent of the corporation or of its predecessor, or is or was serving as such of another corporation, partnership, joint venture, trust or other enterprise, at the request of the corporation against expenses, judgments, fines, settlements, and other amounts actually and reasonably incurred in connection with any threatened, pending, or completed action or proceeding, whether civil, criminal or administrative, as provided in Section 317 of the CAGL.

Tan Door Media Inc.

The bylaws of Tan Door Media Inc. provide that Tan Door Media Inc. has power to indemnify any person who is or was a director, officer, employee, or other agent of the corporation or of its predecessor, or is or was serving as such of another corporation, partnership, joint venture, trust or other enterprise, at the request of the corporation against expenses, judgments, fines, settlements, and other amounts actually and reasonably incurred in connection with any threatened, pending, or completed action or proceeding, whether civil, criminal or administrative, as provided in Section 317 of the CAGL.

Traffic Cat, Inc.

The bylaws of Traffic Cat, Inc. provide that Traffic Cat, Inc. has power to indemnify any person who is or was a director, officer, employee, or other agent of the corporation or of its predecessor, or is or was serving as such of another corporation, partnership, joint venture, trust or other enterprise, at the request of the corporation against expenses, judgments, fines, settlements, and other amounts actually and reasonably incurred in connection with any threatened, pending, or completed action or proceeding, whether civil, criminal or administrative, as provided in Section 317 of the CAGL.

Transbloom, Inc.

The bylaws of Transbloom, Inc. provide that Transbloom, Inc. has power to indemnify any person who is or was a director, officer, employee, or other agent of the corporation or of its predecessor, or is or was serving as such of another corporation, partnership, joint venture, trust or other enterprise, at the request of the corporation against expenses, judgments, fines, settlements, and other amounts actually and reasonably incurred in connection with any threatened, pending, or completed action or proceeding, whether civil, criminal or administrative, as provided in Section 317 of the CAGL.

II-8

Various, Inc.

The bylaws of Various, Inc. provide that Various, Inc. has power to indemnify any person who is or was a director, officer, employee, or other agent of the corporation or of its predecessor, or is or was serving as such of another corporation, partnership, joint venture, trust or other enterprise, at the request of the corporation against expenses, judgments, fines, settlements, and other amounts actually and reasonably incurred in connection with any threatened, pending, or completed action or proceeding, whether civil, criminal or administrative, as provided in Section 317 of the CAGL.

Video Bliss, Inc.

The bylaws of Video Bliss, Inc. provide that Video Bliss, Inc. may indemnify any director, officer, agent or employee as to those liabilities and on those terms and conditions as are specified in Section 317 of the CAGL.

West Coast Facilities Inc.

The bylaws of West Coast Facilities Inc. provide that the corporation shall have the power to indemnify any person who was or is a party, or is threatened to be made a party, to any proceeding (other than an action by or in the right of the corporation to procure a judgment in its favor) by reason of the fact that such person is or was an agent of the corporation, against expenses, judgments, fines, settlements, and other amounts actually and reasonably incurred in connection with such proceedings, if the agent acted in good faith and in a manner the agent reasonably believed to be in the best interests of the corporation. If there are criminal charges, the agent must have had no reasonable cause to believe that his or her conduct was unlawful. The termination of any proceeding by judgment, order, settlement, conviction, or plea of nolo contendere or its equivalent shall not, of itself, create a presumption that the agent did not act in good faith and in a manner that the agent reasonably believed to be in the best interests of the corporation, or that the agent had reasonable cause to believe that his or her conduct was unlawful.

The bylaws further provide that the corporation shall have the power to indemnify any person who was, is, or threatened to be made a party by reason of the fact that that person is or was an agent of the corporation, to any threatened, pending or completed legal action by or under the rights of the corporation to procure a judgment in its favor, against expenses actually and reasonably incurred by the agent in connection with the defense or settlement of that action, if the agent acted in good faith, in a manner the agent believed to be in the best interests of the corporation and its shareholders, and with such care, including reasonably inquiry, as an ordinarily prudent person would use under similar circumstances. However, the corporation shall not indemnify:

any amount paid with respect to a claim, issue or matter for which the agent has been adjudged liable to the corporation and its shareholders in the performance of his or her duty, except for any expenses (exclusive of judgment or settlement amount) specifically authorized by the court in which the proceeding is or was pending in accordance with statutory requirements;

any amount paid by the agent in settling or otherwise disposing of a threatened or pending lawsuit by the corporation, with or without court approval; and

any expenses incurred in defending a threatened or pending action that is settled or otherwise disposed of without court approval.

The bylaws further provide that if an agent is successful on the merits, the corporation shall indemnify the agent for expenses actually and reasonably incurred. Unless indemnification is mandatory because of the agent’s successful defense on the merits, the bylaws set forth the manner in which to determine whether indemnification is proper, that is because the agent has met the applicable standard of conduct, and indemnification is authorized by one of the following: (i) majority vote of the board with a quorum of consisting of directors who are not parties to the proceeding; (ii) independent legal counsel in a written opinion if a quorum of directors who are not parties to the proceeding is not available; (iii) the affirmative vote of a majority of the outstanding shares entitled to vote and present or represented at a duly held meeting at which a quorum is present or by the written consent of a majority of the outstanding shares entitled to vote (without counting shares owned by the person seeking indemnification as either outstanding or entitled to vote); or (iv) the court in which the proceeding is or was pending, upon application

II-9

by the corporation, the agent, the agent’s attorney, or other person rendering services in connection with the defenses, regardless of whether the corporation opposes the application.

The corporation shall also have the power to advance expenses incurred in defending any proceeding prior to the disposition of the proceeding upon receipt of an undertaking by or on behalf of the director to repay the amount if it shall be ultimately determined that the person is not entitled to indemnification under the CAGCL.

Registrants incorporated as a corporation in New York

Section 722 of the New York Business Corporation Law (“NYBCL”) provides that a New York corporation may indemnify any person made, or threatened to be made, a party to an action or proceeding (other than one by or in the right of the corporation to procure a judgment in its favor), whether civil or criminal, including an action by or in the right of any other corporation of any type or kind, domestic or foreign, or any partnership, joint venture, trust, employee benefit plan or other enterprise, which any director or officer of the corporation served in any capacity at the request of the corporation, by reason of the fact that he, his testator or intestate, was a director or officer of the corporation, or served such other corporation, partnership, joint venture, trust, employee benefit plan or other enterprise in any capacity, against judgments, fines, amounts paid in settlement and reasonable expenses, including attorneys’ fees actually and necessarily incurred as a result of such action or proceeding, or any appeal therein, if such director or officer acted, in good faith, for a purpose which he reasonably believed to be in, or, in the case of service for any other corporation or any partnership, joint venture, trust, employee benefit plan or other enterprise, not opposed to, the best interests of the corporation and, in criminal actions or proceedings, in addition, had no reasonable cause to believe that his conduct was unlawful.

Section 722 further provides that a New York corporation may indemnify any person made, or threatened to be made, a party to an action by or in the right of the corporation to procure a judgment in its favor by reason of the fact that he, his testator or intestate, is or was a director or officer of the corporation, or is or was serving at the request of the corporation as a director or officer of any other corporation of any type or kind, domestic or foreign, of any partnership, joint venture, trust, employee benefit plan or other enterprise, against amounts paid in settlement and reasonable expenses, including attorneys’ fees, actually and necessarily incurred by him in connection with the defense or settlement of such action, or in connection with an appeal therein, if such director or officer acted, in good faith, for a purpose which he reasonably believed to be in, or, in the case of service for any other corporation or any partnership, joint venture, trust, employee benefit plan or other enterprise, not opposed to, the best interests of the corporation, except that no indemnification under this paragraph shall be made in respect of (1) a threatened action, or a pending action which is settled or otherwise disposed of, or (2) any claim, issue or matter as to which such person shall have been adjudged to be liable to the corporation, unless and only to the extent that the court in which the action was brought, or, if no action was brought, any court of competent jurisdiction, determines upon application that, in view of all the circumstances of the case, the person is fairly and reasonably entitled to indemnity for such portion of the settlement amount and expenses as the court deems proper.

General Media Communications, Inc.

The bylaws of General Media Communications, Inc. provide that the corporation shall, to the fullest extent permitted by the NYBCL, indemnify those of its officers, directors, employees, agents and others as shall be entitled to indemnification for their service to or at the direction of the corporation as shall be permitted by, and pursuant to the procedures set forth in, the NYBCL.

General Media Entertainment, Inc.

The bylaws of General Media Entertainment, Inc. provide that the corporation shall, to the fullest extent permitted by the NYBCL or any successor statute, indemnify those of its officers, directors, employees, agents and others as shall be entitled to indemnification for their service to or at the direction of the corporation as shall be permitted by, and pursuant to, the procedures set forth in the NYBCL or any successor statute.

II-10

GMCI Internet Operations, Inc.

The bylaws of GMCI Internet Operations, Inc. provide that the corporation shall advance the expenses of each person to the full extent permitted by the NYBCL.

Penthouse Digital Media Productions Inc.

The bylaws of Penthouse Digital Media Productions Inc. provide that the corporation shall indemnify any person made, or threatened to be made, a party to an action or proceeding, civil or criminal (including an action by or in the right of the corporation or by or in the right of any other corporation of any type or kind, domestic or foreign, or of any partnership, joint venture, trust, employee benefit plan or other enterprise which any director or officer of the corporation served in any capacity at the request of the corporation) by reason of the fact that he, his testator or intestate is or was a director or officer of the corporation (or served the corporation or such other enterprise in any capacity) against judgments, fines, amounts paid in settlement and reasonable expenses, including attorneys’ fees actually and necessarily incurred as a result of such action or proceeding and expenses incurred by such person in defending or settling such action or proceeding. The corporation may indemnify, and make advancements to, any person made, or threatened to be made, a party to any such action or proceeding by reason of the fact that he, his testator or intestate, is or was an agent or employee (other than a director or officer of the corporation or served another enterprise at the request of the corporation in any capacity), on such terms, to such extent, and subject to such conditions, as the Board of Directors shall determine.

Penthouse Images Acquisitions, Ltd.

The bylaws of Penthouse Images Acquisitions, Ltd provide that the corporation shall, to the fullest extent permitted by the NYBCL, indemnify those of its officers, directors, employees, agents and others as shall be entitled to indemnification for their service to or at the direction of the corporation as shall be permitted by, and pursuant to the procedures set forth in, the NYBCL.

Pure Entertainment Telecommunications, Inc.

The bylaws of Pure Entertainment Telecommunications, Inc. provide that the corporation shall, to the fullest extent permitted by the NYBCL, indemnify those of its officers, directors, employees, agents and others as shall be entitled to indemnification for their service to or at the direction of the corporation as shall be permitted by, and pursuant to the procedures set forth in, the NYBCL.

Registrants organized as a limited liability company in Texas

Section 101.402 of the Texas Business Organizations Code permits a Texas limited liability company to:

•

indemnify a person;

•

pay in advance or reimburse expenses incurred by a person; and

•

purchase or procure or establish and maintain insurance or another arrangement to indemnify or hold harmless a person.

Snapshot Productions, LLC

The operating agreement of Snapshot Productions, LLC provides that the company shall indemnify, hold harmless, protect and defend each of the members and managers and may indemnify, hold harmless, protect and defend each of the officers, employees and agents, if any, of the company (each, an “Indemnitee”), against any losses, claims, damages or liabilities, including, without limitation, legal or other expenses incurred in investigating or defending against any such loss, claim, damages or liability and any amounts expended in settlement of any claim, to which any Indemnitee may become subject by reason of any act or omission (even if negligent or grossly negligent) performed or omitted to be performed on behalf of the company or by reason of the fact that such Indemnitee was a member or manager, officer, employee, or agent of the company or is or was serving at the request of the company as a director, trustee, manager, officer, employee or agent of another corporation, partnership, joint venture, limited liability company, trust or other enterprise, provided however, that no indemnification may be made

II-11

to or on behalf of any Indemnitee if a judgment or other final adjudication adverse to such Indemnitee establishes (a) that his or her acts were committed in bad faith or involved intentional misconduct or knowing violation of law or (b) that he or she personally gained through such an act or omission a financial profit or other advantage to which he or she was legally entitled. The provisions of this section of Snapshot Productions, LLC’s operating agreement shall continue to afford protection to each Indemnitee regardless of whether such Indemnitee remains a member or manager, officer, employee or agent, if applicable, of the company. Any indemnity should be paid out of the company’s assets only.

Item 15. Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities

During the three years preceding the filing of this registration statement, we sold the following securities which were not registered under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.

On August 23, 2006, we issued $24,441,056 in principal amount to the holders of the outstanding Subordinated Term Loan Notes to PET Capital Partners LLC to replace the then outstanding Subordinated Term Loan Note of $24,033,160 in the principal amount issued on August 17, 2005 and the Subordinated Term Loan Note of $407,896 issued on October 5, 2005. The notes were issued in reliance upon Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933 as a transaction by an issuer not involving a public offering.

On August 10, 2006, we issued 504,796 shares of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock, at $11.89 per share for a total of $6.0 million and on August 28, 2006, we issued $5.0 million of our 2006 Notes and warrants to purchase an aggregate of 441,470 shares of common stock, subject to adjustment for certain anti-dilution provisions, at an exercise price of $0.0002, to fund the acquisition of substantially all of the assets of the debtor estate of Jill Kelly Productions, Inc. and for general corporate purposes. All of these securities were issued to existing security holders and in reliance upon Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933 as a transaction by an issuer not involving a public offering and Regulation D promulgated thereunder. No commissions or underwriting expenses were paid in connection with the transaction.

On October 5, 2006, we issued $3,177,337 in principal amount of Subordinated Term Loan Notes to the holders of the outstanding Subordinated Term Loan Notes in lieu of payment of cash interest due under such notes. These notes were issued in reliance upon Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933 as a transaction by an issuer not involving a public offering.

On October 25, 2006, we issued $916,420 of Subordinated Term Loan Notes to PET Capital Partners LLC. These notes were issued in reliance upon Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933 as a transaction by an issuer not involving a public offering. No commissions or underwriting expenses were paid in connection with the transaction.

Also in October 2006, in connection with the purchase of Video Bliss, Inc., Danni Ashe, Inc. and Snapshot Productions LLC, we issued 100,960 shares of common stock to the seller at the closing. These shares were issued in reliance upon Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933 as a transaction by an issuer not involving a public offering.

On October 5, 2007, we issued $3,702,907 in principal amount of Subordinated Term Loan Notes to the holders of the outstanding Subordinated Term Loan Notes in lieu of payment of cash interest due under such notes. These notes were issued in reliance upon Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933 as a transaction by an issuer not involving a public offering.

In December 2007, we issued 8,444,853 shares of Series B Convertible Preferred Stock, at $0.59208 per share for a total of $5.0 million to Messrs. Staton and Bell, Florescue Family Corporation and an existing stockholder. These shares were issued in reliance upon Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933 as a transaction by an issuer not involving a public offering. No commissions or underwriting expenses were paid in connection with the transaction.

In December 2007, we issued $1,838,141 in principal amount of 2005 Notes in lieu of cash interest due under the provisions of the 2005 Notes. We also issued $862,152 in principal amount of 2005 Notes and $137,848 in principal amount of 2006 Notes pro rata to the holders of such notes in consideration for their waivers of certain defaults and consents to the incurrence of additional debt in connection with our acquisition of Various, Inc.

II-12

Additionally, we issued warrants to purchase a total of 2,250,994 shares of our common stock, subject to adjustment for certain anti-dilution provisions, at an exercise price of $0.0002 per share, to 15 holders of our Series A Convertible Preferred Stock, warrants, 2006 Notes and 2005 Notes in lieu of the application of the conversion price adjustment provided for in the certificate of designation of the Series A Convertible Preferred Stock and the anti-dilution provisions in the warrants triggered by the issuance of the Series B Convertible Preferred Stock, as well as in consideration for their waivers of certain events of default under such notes. These notes and warrants were issued in reliance upon Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933 as a transaction by an issuer not involving a public offering. No commissions or underwriting expenses were paid in connection with these transactions.

In December 2007, INI issued $257.3 million in principal amount of Senior Secured Notes due 2011 with detachable warrants to purchase an aggregate of 4,210,621 shares of our common stock, subject to adjustment for certain anti-dilution provisions, at a purchase price of $0.0002 per share to 15 accredited investors. The proceeds from the sale of these notes were used to pay part of the purchase price for the stock of Various, Inc. These notes were issued in reliance upon Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933 as a transaction by an issuer not involving a public offering and Regulation D promulgated thereunder. No commissions or underwriting expenses were paid in connection with these transactions.

INI also issued $80.0 million in principal amount of Second Lien Subordinated Secured Notes with detachable warrants to purchase 1,187,980 shares of our common stock, subject to adjustment for certain anti-dilution provisions, at a purchase price of $0.0002 per share and $170.0 million in principal amount of Subordinated Convertible Notes in payment of the balance of the purchase price for the stock of Various, Inc. These securities were issued in reliance upon Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933 as a transaction by an issuer not involving a public offering. No commissions or underwriting expenses were paid in connection with the transaction.

On June 30, 2008 we issued $5,808,333 in principal amount of Subordinated Convertible Notes to the holders of the outstanding Subordinated Convertible Notes in lieu of payment of cash interest under such notes. These notes were issued in reliance upon Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933 as a transaction by an issuer not involving a public offering.

On October 5, 2008 we issued $4,190,903 in principal amount of Subordinated Term Loan Notes to the holders of the outstanding Subordinated Term Loan Notes in lieu of payment of cash interest on such notes. These notes were issued in reliance upon Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933 as a transaction by an issuer not involving a public offering.

On December 31, 2008, INI issued additional Subordinated Convertible Notes in the amount of $1.1 million as payment in kind for its interest obligation. These notes were issued in reliance upon Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933 as a transaction by an issuer not involving a public offering.

On June 30, 2009, we issued warrants to purchase a total of 12,631 shares of our common stock, subject to adjustment for certain anti-dilution provisions, at an exercise price of $6.20 per share, to certain holders of our warrants pursuant to an anti-dilution provision in the warrants triggered by the issuance of warrants in connection with the acquisition of Various, Inc. These warrants were issued in reliance upon Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933 as a transaction by an issuer not involving a public offering.

On October 5, 2009 we issued $4,735,721 in principal amount of Subordinated Term Loan Notes to the holders of the outstanding Subordinated Term Loan Notes in lieu of payment of cash interest on such notes. These notes were issued in reliance upon Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933 as a transaction by an issuer not involving a public offering.

On October 8, 2009, we issued $1,646,574 in aggregate principal amount of Subordinated Term Loan Notes to the holders of the outstanding Subordinated Term Loan Notes in satisfaction of a waiver fee. Those notes were issued in reliance upon Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933 as a transaction by an issuer not involving a public offering.

On October 8, 2009, we issued $1,534,984 in aggregate principal amount of 2005 Notes to the holders of the outstanding 2005 Notes in satisfaction of an amendment fee. Those notes were issued in reliance upon Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933 as a transaction by an issuer not involving a public offering.

II-13

On October 8, 2009, we issued $246,227 in aggregate principal amount of 2006 Notes to the holders of the outstanding 2006 Notes in satisfaction of an amendment fee. Those notes were issued in reliance upon Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933 as a transaction by an issuer not involving a public offering.

On October 8, 2009, we issued amended and restated Subordinated Convertible Notes to the holders of the outstanding Subordinated Convertible Notes with an aggregate principal amount of $171,154,997 in satisfaction of the release of an indemnity claim on that portion of the notes. Those notes were issued in reliance upon Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933 as a transaction by an issuer not involving a public offering.

On December 31, 2009, INI issued Subordinated Convertible Notes in the amount of $5,134,650 as payment in kind for its interest obligation. These notes were issued in reliance upon Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933 as a transaction by an issuer not involving a public offering.

On June 30, 2010, INI issued Subordinated Convertible Notes in the amount of $5.2 million as payment in kind for its interest obligation. These notes were issued in reliance upon Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933 as a transaction by an issuer not involving a public offering.

On October 27, 2010, the Company issued new debt to repay our then existing debt. The New First Lien Notes, with an outstanding principal amount of $167.1 million as of September 30, 2010, the Second Lien Subordinated Secured Notes, with an outstanding principal amount of $80.0 million as of September 30, 2010 and $42.8 million principal amount of Senior Secured Notes were exchanged for, or redeemed with proceeds of, $305.0 million principal amount of the New First Lien Notes. Accrued interest on the First Lien Notes, Second Lien Notes and Senior Secured Notes was paid in cash at closing. The remaining $13.5 million principal amount as of September 30, 2010 of Senior Secured Notes were exchanged for $13.8 million of the Cash Pay Second Lien Notes. The Subordinated Convertible Notes and Subordinated Term Notes, with outstanding principal amounts of $180.2 million and $42.8 million respectively, as of September 30, 2010, were exchanged for $232.5 million of the Non-Cash Pay Second Lien Notes. The principal amount of the Non-Cash Pay Second Lien Notes included accrued interest on the exchanged debt instruments.

On December 31, 2010, the Company issued Non-Cash Pay Second Lien Notes in the amount of $4.8 million as payment in kind for its interest obligation. These notes were issued in reliance upon Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933 as a transaction by an issuer not involving a public offering.

On June 30, 2011, the Company issued Non-Cash Pay Second Lien Notes in the amount of $13.6 million as payment in kind for its interest obligation. These notes were issued in reliance upon Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933 as a transaction by an issuer not involving a public offering.

In July 2011, in connection with our acquisition of substantially all of the assets of PerfectMatch.com from Matrima, Inc. we issued the shareholders 126,295 shares of our common stock. These shares of common stock were issued in reliance upon Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933 as a transaction by an issuer not involving a public offering.

In September 2011, in connection with our acquisition of BDM Global Ventures Ltd. we issued to the shareholders of BDM, 1,555,555 shares of our common stock and 6,436,851 warrants to purchase shares of our common stock with exercise prices ranging from $5-$18 per share with an expiration date of December 31, 2021. These shares of common stock and warrants were issued in reliance upon Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933 as a transaction by an issuer not involving a public offering.

II-14

Item 16. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules

(a)

Exhibits Required by Item 601 of Regulation S-K.

Exhibit Number				Description
2.1				Stock Purchase Agreement dated September 21, 2007, by and among Various, Inc., The Andrew B. Conru Trust, established November 6, 2001, The Lars Mapstead Trust, established April 18, 2002, Andrew B. Conru, Lars Mapstead and Penthouse Media Group Inc.⁽¹⁾
2.2				Amendment to Stock Purchase Agreement dated December 6, 2007, by and among Various, Inc., Andrew B. Conru Trust Agreement, Mapstead Trust, created on April 16, 2002, Andrew B. Conru, Lars Mapstead and Penthouse Media Group Inc.⁽¹⁾
2.3				Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of September 7, 2011, by and among FriendFinder Networks Inc., JGC Holdings Limited, BDM Global Ventures Limited, Global Investment Ventures LLC and Anthony R. Bobulinski⁽²⁾
3.4				Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation of FriendFinder Networks Inc., which became effective on January 25, 2010⁽¹⁾
3.5				Amended and Restated Bylaws of FriendFinder Networks Inc.⁽¹⁾
4.1				Specimen of Common Stock Certificate⁽¹⁾
4.7				Certificate of Designation of Series B Convertible Preferred Stock⁽¹⁾
4.8				Amended and Restated Certificate of Designation of Series B Convertible Preferred Stock which became effective on January 25, 2010 prior to the effectiveness of the reverse split of the Company’s Series B Convertible Preferred Stock⁽¹⁾
4.13				Registration Rights Agreement dated December 6, 2007 (Warrants)⁽¹⁾
4.14				Amendment to Registration Rights Agreement (Warrants) dated October 8, 2009⁽¹⁾
4.20				Intercreditor and Subordination Agreement, dated as of October 27, 2010, by and among INI and the Company as Co-Issuers, the Guarantors party thereto, and U.S. Bank, N.A. as Trustee.⁽¹⁾
4.21				Second Lien Intercreditor Agreement, dated as of October 27, 2010, by and among INI and the Company as Co-Issuers, the Guarantors party thereto, and U.S. Bank, N.A. as Trustee.⁽¹⁾
4.24				Security Holders Agreement dated August 17, 2005, by and among Penthouse Media Group Inc. and Holders of Equity Securities of Penthouse Media Group Inc.⁽¹⁾
4.25				Security Holders Agreement dated December 6, 2007, by and among Penthouse Media Group Inc. and Holders of Equity Securities of Penthouse Media Group Inc.⁽¹⁾
4.26				Shareholders’ Agreement dated September 21, 2004, by and among PET Capital Partners LLC, Marc H. Bell, Daniel C. Staton, certain other investors and Penthouse Media Group Inc.⁽¹⁾
4.35				Form of 14% Senior Secured Note, Series A, Due 2013 (filed with Exhibit 4.66)
4.36				Form of 14% Senior Secured Note, Series B, Due 2013 (filed with Exhibit 4.66)
4.37				Form of Cash Pay Secured Note, Series A, Due 2013 (filed with Exhibit 4.68)
4.38				Form of Cash Pay Secured Note, Series B, Due 2013 (filed with Exhibit 4.68)
4.39				Agreement re: Limitation on Ability to Acquire Common Stock by and between FriendFinder Networks Inc. and Beach Point Capital Management LP dated October 8, 2009⁽¹⁾
4.40				Form of Amendment to Warrants executed in connection with Agreement re: Limitation on Ability to Acquire Common Stock⁽¹⁾
4.41				Securities Purchase Agreement dated August 17, 2005, by and among Penthouse Media Group Inc., each Subsidiary of Penthouse Media Group Inc. acting as a Guarantor, the Security Holders named therein and U.S. Bank National Association⁽¹⁾
4.42				First Amendment and Limited Waiver to Securities Purchase Agreement dated August 28, 2006, by and among Penthouse Media Group Inc., each Subsidiary of Penthouse Media Group Inc. acting as a Guarantor, the Security Holders named therein and U.S. Bank National Association⁽¹⁾

II-15

Exhibit Number				Description
4.43				Second Amendment and Limited Waiver to Securities Purchase Agreements for Acquisition and Related Transactions dated December 6, 2007, by and among Penthouse Media Group Inc., each Subsidiary of Penthouse Media Group Inc. acting as a Guarantor, the Security Holders named therein and U.S. Bank National Association⁽¹⁾
4.44				Issuer Security and Pledge Agreement dated August 17, 2005, by and between Penthouse Media Group Inc. and U.S. Bank National Association, as collateral agent for the Security Holders party to the Securities Purchase Agreement dated August 17, 2005⁽¹⁾
4.45				First Amendment to Issuer Security and Pledge Agreement dated August 28, 2006, by and between Penthouse Media Group Inc. and U.S. Bank National Association, as collateral agent for the Security Holders party to the Securities Purchase Agreement dated August 17, 2005⁽¹⁾
4.46				Form of Guarantor Security and Pledge Agreement dated August 17, 2005, by and between each Guarantor and U.S. Bank National Association, as collateral agent for the Security Holders party to the Securities Purchase Agreement dated August 17, 2005⁽¹⁾
4.47				Form of First Amendment to Guarantor Security and Pledge Agreement dated August 28, 2006, by and between each Guarantor and U.S. Bank National Association, as collateral agent for the Security Holders party to the Securities Purchase Agreement dated August 17, 2005⁽¹⁾
4.48				Securities Purchase Agreement dated August 28, 2006, by and among Penthouse Media Group Inc., each Subsidiary of Penthouse Media Group Inc. acting as a Guarantor, the Security Holders named therein and U.S. Bank National Association⁽¹⁾
4.49				Limited Waiver for Series B Convertible Preferred Stock Sale, dated as of December 6, 2007, by and between Penthouse Media Group Inc., the Guarantors named therein and the Holders named therein⁽¹⁾
4.50				Securities Purchase Agreement dated December 6, 2007, by and among Interactive Network, Inc., each Subsidiary of Penthouse Media Group Inc. acting as a Guarantor, the Security Holders named therein and U.S. Bank National Association⁽¹⁾
4.51				Amendment No. 1 to Securities Purchase Agreement effective January 14, 2008, by and among Interactive Network, Inc., each Subsidiary of Penthouse Media Group Inc. acting as a Guarantor, the Security Holders named therein and U.S. Bank National Association⁽¹⁾
4.52				Issuer Security and Pledge Agreement dated December 6, 2007, by and between Interactive Network, Inc. and U.S. Bank National Association, as collateral agent for the Security Holders party to the Securities Purchase Agreement dated December 6, 2007⁽¹⁾
4.53				Parent Security and Pledge Agreement dated December 6, 2007, by and between Penthouse Media Group Inc. and U.S. Bank National Association, as collateral agent for the Security Holders party to the Securities Purchase Agreement dated December 6, 2007⁽¹⁾
4.54				Sellers’ Securities Agreement dated December 6, 2007, by and among Interactive Network, Inc., each Subsidiary of Penthouse Media Group Inc. acting as a Guarantor, the Security Holders named therein and U.S. Bank National Association⁽¹⁾
4.55				Amendment to Sellers’ Securities Agreement dated as of December 6, 2008, by and among Interactive Network, Inc., each Subsidiary of Penthouse Media Group Inc. acting as a Guarantor, the Security Holders named therein and U.S. Bank National Association⁽¹⁾
4.56				Issuer Security and Pledge Agreement dated December 6, 2007, by and between Interactive Network, Inc. and U.S. Bank National Association, as collateral agent for the Security Holders party to the Sellers’ Securities Agreement dated December 6, 2007⁽¹⁾
4.57				Parent Security and Pledge Agreement dated December 6, 2007, by and between Penthouse Media Group Inc. and U.S. Bank National Association, as collateral agent for the Security Holders party to the Sellers’ Securities Agreement dated December 6, 2007⁽¹⁾
4.62				Third Amendment and Limited Waiver to Securities Purchase Agreement dated October 8, 2009, by and among FriendFinder Networks Inc., the Guarantor parties signatory thereto and the Holders named therein⁽¹⁾

II-16

Exhibit Number				Description
4.63				Amendment No. 2 and Waiver to Securities Purchase Agreement relating to Interactive Network, Inc., dated October 8, 2009⁽¹⁾
4.64				Amendment No. 2 and Waiver to Sellers’ Securities Agreement relating to the Subordinated Secured Notes due 2011 of Interactive Network, Inc. dated October 8, 2009⁽¹⁾
4.65				Binding Term Sheet by and among FriendFinder Networks Inc., Interactive Network, Inc., Andrew B. Conru Trust Agreement, Mapstead Trust, created on April 16, 2002, Andrew B Conru, Lars Mapstead, Daniel Staton and Marc H. Bell, dated October 8, 2009⁽¹⁾
4.66				Indenture, dated as of October 27, 2010, by and among INI and the Company as Co-Issuers, the Guarantors party thereto, and U.S. Bank, N.A. as Trustee relating to the 14% Senior Secured Notes due 2013⁽¹⁾
4.67				Indenture, dated as of October 27, 2010, by and among INI and the Company as Co-Issuers, the Guarantors party thereto, and U.S. Bank, N.A. as Trustee relating to the 11.5% Convertible Non-Cash Pay Secured Notes due 2014⁽¹⁾
4.68				Indenture, dated as of October 27, 2010, by and among INI and the Company as Co-Issuers, the Guarantors party thereto, and U.S. Bank, N.A. as Trustee relating to the 14% Cash Pay Secured Notes due 2013⁽¹⁾
4.69				Security and Pledge Agreement⁽¹⁾
4.70				Second Lien Cash Pay Security and Pledge Agreement⁽¹⁾
4.71				Form of Non-Cash Pay Secured Note, Series A, Due 2014 (filed with Exhibit 4.67)
4.72				Form of Non-Cash Pay Secured Note, Series B, Due 2014 (filed with Exhibit 4.67)
5.1				Opinion of Akerman Senterfitt*
5.2				Opinion of Brownstein Hyatt Farber Schreck, LLP as to matters of Nevada law*
5.3				Opinion of Brownstein Hyatt Farber Schreck, LLP as to matters of California law*
9.1				Voting Agreement dated July 6, 2005, by and among Barry Florescue, Marc H. Bell and Daniel C. Staton⁽¹⁾
10.1				Form of Indemnification Agreement between FriendFinder Networks Inc. and its Directors and Officers⁽¹⁾
10.2				Amended and Restated Management Agreement, dated as of November 1, 2010, by and between the Company and Bell & Staton, Inc.⁽¹⁾
10.3				Form of Employment Agreement, dated as of March , 2011, by and between FriendFinder Networks Inc. and Daniel C. Staton, effective upon closing of the Exchange Offering⁽¹⁾
10.4				Form of Employment Agreement, dated as of March , 2011, by and between FriendFinder Networks Inc. and Marc H. Bell, effective upon closing of the Exchange Offering⁽¹⁾
10.5				Securities Purchase Agreement dated July 6, 2005, by and among Penthouse Media Group, Inc., PET Capital Partners II LLC and Absolute Return Europe Fund⁽¹⁾
10.6				Note Exchange Agreement dated August 17, 2005, by and among Penthouse Media Group, Inc., PET Capital Partners LLC and Absolute Return Europe Fund⁽¹⁾
10.7				Securities Purchase Agreement dated August 10, 2006, by and between Penthouse Media Group, Inc. and PET Capital Partners II LLC⁽¹⁾
10.8				Securities Purchase Agreement dated July 23, 2007, by and among Penthouse Media Group, Inc. and the Investors named therein⁽¹⁾
10.9				Escrow Agreement dated July 23 2007, by and among Penthouse Media Group, Inc., the Investors named therein and Moses & Singer LLP as the Escrow Agent⁽¹⁾
10.10				Letter to Absolute Return Europe Fund re: Penthouse Media Group Inc. Series B Offering⁽¹⁾
10.11				Letter to Florescue Family Corporation re: Penthouse Media Group Inc. Series B Offering⁽¹⁾
10.12				Letter to Mr. Russell H. Frye re: Penthouse Media Group Inc. Series B Offering⁽¹⁾

II-17

Exhibit Number				Description
10.13				Assignment Agreement dated December 6, 2007, concerning Stock Purchase Agreement dated September 21, 2007⁽¹⁾
10.14				Independent Contractor Agreement dated September 21, 2007, by and between Hinok Media Inc. and Various, Inc.⁽¹⁾
10.15				Amendment to Independent Contractor Agreement dated May 12, 2008, by and between Hinok Media Inc. and Various, Inc.⁽¹⁾
10.16				Amendment No. 2 to Independent Contractor Agreement, Assignment and Limited Waiver dated October 8, 2009, by and between Hinok Media Inc., YouMu, Inc. and Various Inc.⁽¹⁾
10.17				Amendment to Letter Agreement Dated October 8, 2009 by and among the Company, Andrew B. Conru Trust Agreement, Mapstead Trust and Messrs. Conru, Mapstead, Bell and Staton⁽¹⁾
10.18				Letter Agreement relating to confirmation of certain consent and exchange fees, by and between the Company and Andrew B. Conru Trust Agreement dated October 27, 2010⁽¹⁾
10.19				Letter Agreement relating to confirmation of certain consent and exchange fees, by and between the Company and Mapstead Trust dated October 27, 2010⁽¹⁾
10.20				Subscription Agreement for Non-Cash Pay Secured Notes Due 2014, dated as of October 27, 2010⁽¹⁾
10.21				Employee Proprietary Information Agreement dated September 21, 2007, by and between Andrew B. Conru and Various, Inc.⁽¹⁾
10.22				Independent Contractor Agreement dated September 21, 2007, by and between Legendary Technology Inc. and Various, Inc.⁽¹⁾
10.23				Amendment No. 1 to Independent Contractor Agreement dated October 8, 2009, by and between Legendary Technology Inc. and Various, Inc.⁽¹⁾
10.24				Employee Proprietary Information Agreement dated September 21, 2007, by and between Lars Mapstead and Various, Inc.⁽¹⁾
10.25				Employment Agreement dated September 6, 2007, by and between Penthouse Media Group Inc. and Ezra Shashoua⁽¹⁾
10.26				Consulting Agreement dated September 11, 2007, by and between Penthouse Media Group Inc. and Ezra Shashoua⁽¹⁾
10.27				Amended and Restated Employment Agreement, dated July 28, 2008, by and between Penthouse Media Group Inc. and Ezra Shashoua⁽¹⁾
10.28				Second Amended and Restated Employment Offer, Dated April 1, 2010, by and between the Company and Ezra Shoshana⁽¹⁾
10.29				Form of Employment Agreement, dated as of March 14, 2011, by and between FriendFinder Networks Inc. and Anthony Previte⁽¹⁾
10.30				Employment Agreement, effective as of January 1, 2011, by and between the Company and Robert Brackett⁽¹⁾
10.31				Bonus Award Agreement dated November 13, 2007 by and between Various, Inc. and Robert Brackett⁽¹⁾
10.32				Amendment to Bonus Award Agreement dated December 5, 2007, by and between Various, Inc. and Robert Brackett⁽¹⁾
10.33				Employee Proprietary Information Agreement dated November 9, 2007, by and between Various, Inc. and Robert Brackett⁽¹⁾
10.34				Consulting Agreement dated December 11, 2006, by and between Penthouse Media Group Inc. and Starsmith LLC⁽¹⁾
10.35				Fourth Amendment to Lease, Dated November 1, 2010, by and between 6800 Broken Sound LLC and FriendFinder Networks Inc.⁽¹⁾
10.36				Lease dated May 6, 2008 by and between 20 Broad Company LLC and Penthouse Media Group Inc.⁽¹⁾

II-18

Exhibit Number				Description
10.37				Lease dated April 24, 2009 by and between NBP Partners I, LLC and Streamray Studios, Inc.⁽¹⁾
10.38				Lease dated April 21, 2005 by and between KNK Properties, LLC and Streamray Inc.⁽¹⁾
10.39				Modification of Lease, dated September 1, 2005, by and between KNK Properties, LLC and Streamray Inc.⁽¹⁾
10.40				Modification of Lease, dated April 1, 2007, by and between KNK Properties, LLC and Streamray Inc.⁽¹⁾
10.41				Modification of Lease, dated May 1, 2009, by and between KNK Properties, LLC and Streamray Inc.⁽¹⁾
10.42				Modification of Lease, dated October 14, 2009, by and between KNK Properties, LLC and Streamray Inc.⁽¹⁾
10.43				Lease dated May 9, 2008, between Batton Associates, LLC, Lessor and Various, Inc., Lessee⁽¹⁾
10.44				Commercial Lease Agreement dated December 14, 2009 by and between Escondido Partners II, LLC and Steamray Inc.⁽¹⁾
10.45				Amended and Restated FriendFinder Networks Inc. 2008 Stock Option Plan⁽¹⁾
10.46				Form of FriendFinder Networks Inc. Stock Option Agreement for Employees⁽¹⁾
10.47				Form of FriendFinder Networks Inc. Stock Option Agreement Non-ISO⁽¹⁾
10.48				Form of FriendFinder Networks Inc. Stock Option Agreement for Directors⁽¹⁾
10.49				Form of FriendFinder Networks Inc. Stock Option Agreement for Consultants⁽¹⁾
10.50				Form of FriendFinder Networks Inc. Stock Option Agreement for Board Consultants⁽¹⁾
10.51				FriendFinder Networks Inc. 2009 Restricted Stock Plan⁽¹⁾
10.52				Form of FriendFinder Networks Inc. 2009 Restricted Stock Plan Restricted Stock Grant Agreement⁽¹⁾
10.53				Agreement, dated as of December 17, 2009, by and between Daniel C. Staton and FriendFinder Networks Inc.⁽¹⁾
10.54				Agreement, dated as of December 17, 2009, by and between Marc H. Bell and FriendFinder Networks Inc.⁽¹⁾
10.55				Agreement, dated as of December 17, 2009, by and between Andrew B. Conru Trust Agreement and FriendFinder Networks Inc.⁽¹⁾
10.56				Agreement, dated as of December 17, 2009, by and between Mapstead Trust, created on April 16, 2002 and FriendFinder Networks Inc.⁽¹⁾
10.57				Equity Put Agreement, dated as of September 7, 2011, by and among FriendFinder Networks Inc., the Shareholders and Anthony R. Bobulinski, in his capacity as the Shareholders’ representative.⁽²⁾
10.58				Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of September 7, 2011, by and among FriendFinder Networks Inc., Global Investment Ventures LLC and Anthony R. Bobulinski⁽²⁾
10.59				Employment Agreement, dated as of November 18, 2011, between FriendFinder Networks Inc., Various, Inc. and Ezra Shashoua.⁽³⁾
12.1				Statement re Computation of Ratios **
21.1				List of Subsidiaries ***
23.1				Consent of EisnerAmper LLP **
23.2				Consent of Akerman Senterfitt (to be included in Exhibit 5.1)*
23.3				Consent of Brownstein Hyatt Farber Schreck, LLP (to be included in Exhibit 5.2)*
23.4				Consent of Brownstein Hyatt Farber Schreck, LLP (to be included in Exhibit 5.3)*
24.1				Powers of Attorney (included on signature pages) ***
25.1				Statement of Eligibility of Trustee ***
25.2				Statement of Eligibility of Trustee ***
25.3				Statement of Eligibility of Trustee ***

II-19

Filed herewith.

Filed with Amendment No. 1 to the registration statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-177360) on November 23, 2011.

* **

Filed with the registration statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-177360) on October 18, 2011.

(1)

Incorporated by reference to the exhibit with the corresponding number filed with the Form S-1(File No. 333-156414) or any of the amendments filed thereto.

(2)

Incorporated by reference to Exhibits 2.1, 10.1 and 10.2 filed with the Form 8-K on September 12, 2011.

(3)

Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 filed with the Form 8-K on November 22, 2011.

(b)

Financial Statement Schedules required by Regulation S-X and Item 14(e), Item 17(a) or Item 17(b)(9).

Description of Financial Statement Schedules				Page Number
Schedule II — Valuation and Qualifying Accounts					II-21

Other financial statement schedules have been omitted because the required information is either not applicable, not deemed material or is shown in the respective financial statements or in the notes thereto.

(c)

Not applicable.

II-20

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

The Board of Directors and Stockholders
FriendFinder Networks Inc.

We have audited the consolidated financial statements of FriendFinder Networks Inc. and subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2010 and 2009, and for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2010 and have issued our report thereon dated March 15, 2011 except for Notes Q(l) and T and the last paragraph of Note Q(a) as to which the dates are April 13, 2011, May 19, 2011, and July 6, 2011, respectively, included elsewhere in this Registration Statement. Our audits also included the financial statement schedule listed in Item 16(b) of this Registration Statement. This schedule is the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on this schedule based on our audits.

In our opinion, the financial statement schedule referred to above, when considered in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly in all material respects, the information set forth therein.

/s/ EisnerAmper LLP
New York, New York
March 15, 2011

FRIENDFINDER NETWORKS INC.
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2010, 2009, AND 2008
VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS
(IN THOUSANDS)

	Balance at Beginning of Period		Additions Charged to Costs and Expenses		Deductions Charged to Other Accounts			Deductions			Balance at End of Period
Description
Year Ended December 31, 2008:
Allowance for doubtful accounts	$	1,368	$	1,505	$	—		$	363	(a)	$	2,510
Deferred tax asset valuation allowance		4,782		4,842		—			—			9,624
Year Ended December 31, 2009:
Allowance for doubtful accounts		2,510		249		—			607	(a)		2,152
Deferred tax asset valuation allowance		9,624		4,881		2,557	(b)		—			11,948
Year Ended December 31, 2010:
Allowance for doubtful accounts		2,152		839		—			755	(a)		2,236
Deferred tax asset valuation allowance		11,948		16,679		—			—			28,627

Notes:

(a)

Accounts receivable amounts considered uncollectible and removed from accounts receivable by reducing the allowance for doubtful accounts.

(b)

Reduction of the valuation allowance and corresponding increase in deferred tax liability due to elimination of United Kingdom VAT liability.

II-21

Item 17. Undertakings

Each undersigned registrant hereby undertakes:

(1) To file, during any period in which offers or sales are being made, a post-effective amendment to this registration statement:

(i) To include any prospectus required by Section 10(a)(3) of the Securities Act of 1933;

(ii) To reflect in the prospectus any facts or events arising after the effective date of the registration statement (or the most recent post-effective amendment thereof) which, individually or in the aggregate, represent a fundamental change in the information set forth in the registration statement. Notwithstanding the foregoing, any increase or decrease in volume of securities offered (if the total dollar value of securities offered would not exceed that which was registered) and any deviation from the low or high end of the estimated maximum offering range may be reflected in the form of prospectus filed with the Commission pursuant to Rule 424(b) if, in the aggregate, the changes in volume and price represent no more than 20% change in the maximum aggregate offering price set forth in the “Calculation of Registration Fee” table in the effective registration statement; and

(iii) To include any material information with respect to the plan of distribution not previously disclosed in the registration statement or any material change to such information in the registration statement.

(2) That, for the purpose of determining any liability under the Securities Act of 1933, each such post-effective amendment shall be deemed to be a new registration statement relating to the securities offered therein, and the offering of such securities at that time shall be deemed to be the initial bona fide offering thereof.

(3) To remove from registration by means of a post-effective amendment any of the securities being registered which remain unsold at the termination of the offering.

(4) That, for the purpose of determining liability under the Securities Act of 1933 to any purchaser, if the registrant is subject to Rule 430C, each prospectus filed pursuant to Rule 424(b) as part of a registration statement relating to an offering, other than registration statements relying on Rule 430B or other than prospectuses filed in reliance on Rule 430A, shall be deemed to be part of and included in the registration statement as of the date it is first used after effectiveness. Provided, however, that no statement made in a registration statement or prospectus that is part of the registration statement or made in a document incorporated or deemed incorporated by reference into the registration statement or prospectus that is part of the registration statement will, as to a purchaser with a time of contract of sale prior to such first use, supersede or modify any statement that was made in the registration statement or prospectus that was part of the registration statement or made in any such document immediately prior to such date of first use.

(5) That, for the purpose of determining liability of the registrant under the Securities Act of 1933 to any purchaser in the initial distribution of the securities:

Each undersigned registrant undertakes that in a primary offering of securities of the undersigned registrant pursuant to this registration statement, regardless of the underwriting method used to sell the securities to the purchaser, if the securities are offered or sold to such purchaser by means of any of the following communications, the undersigned registrant will be a seller to the purchaser and will be considered to offer or sell such securities to such purchaser:

(i) Any preliminary prospectus or prospectus of the undersigned registrant relating to the offering required to be filed pursuant to Rule 424;

(ii) Any free writing prospectus relating to the offering prepared by or on behalf of the undersigned registrant or used or referred to by the undersigned registrant;

(iii) The portion of any other free writing prospectus relating to the offering containing material information about the undersigned registrant or its securities provided by or on behalf of the undersigned registrant; and

II-22

(iv) Any other communication that is an offer in the offering made by the undersigned registrant to the purchaser.

Insofar as indemnification for liabilities arising under the Securities Act of 1933 may be permitted to directors, officers and controlling persons of the registrant pursuant to the foregoing provisions, or otherwise, the registrant has been advised that in the opinion of the Securities and Exchange Commission such indemnification is against public policy as expressed in the Act and is, therefore, unenforceable. In the event that a claim for indemnification against such liabilities (other than the payment by the registrant of expenses incurred or paid by a director, officer or controlling person of the registrant in the successful defense of any action, suit or proceeding) is asserted by such director, officer or controlling person in connection with the securities being registered, the registrant will, unless in the opinion of its counsel the matter has been settled by controlling precedent, submit to a court of appropriate jurisdiction the question whether such indemnification by it is against public policy as expressed in the Act and will be governed by the final adjudication of such issue.

II-23

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, the registrant has duly caused this Amendment No. 2 to the Registration Statement to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, in the City of Boca Raton, State of Florida, on December 16 , 2011.

				FRIENDFINDER NETWORKS INC.
				By:				* /s/ Marc H. Bell
								Name: Marc H. Bell
								Title: Chief Executive Officer, President and Director