Attached files

file filename
8-K - UIL HOLDINGS CORPORATION 8-K 12-1-2011 - UIL HOLDINGS CORPform8k.htm
EX-99.4 - EXHIBIT 99.4 - UIL HOLDINGS CORPex99_4.htm
EX-99.3 - EXHIBIT 99.3 - UIL HOLDINGS CORPex99_3.htm
EX-99.2 - EXHIBIT 99.2 - UIL HOLDINGS CORPex99_2.htm

EXHIBIT 99.1
 
 
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

OF

THE UNITED ILLUMINATING COMPANY

AS OF AND FOR THE THREE AND NINE MONTHS ENDED

SEPTEMBER 30, 2011 AND 2010

(UNAUDITED)
 
 
 

 
 
TABLE OF CONTENTS
 
 
Page Number
   
Financial Statements:
 
   
Statement of Income for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010
3
   
Balance Sheet as of September 30, 2011 and 2010
4
   
Statement of Cash Flows for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010
6
   
Statement of Changes in Shareholder’s Equity
7
   
Notes to the Financial Statements
8

 
2

 
 
THE UNITED ILLUMINATING COMPANY
STATEMENT OF INCOME
(In Thousands)
(Unaudited)
 
   
Three Months Ended
September 30,
   
Nine Months Ended
September 30,
 
             
   
2011
   
2010
   
2011
   
2010
 
                         
                         
Operating Revenues
  $ 220,820     $ 236,274     $ 602,482     $ 663,663  
                                 
Operating Expenses
                               
Operation
                               
Purchased power
    52,974       65,616       139,548       194,531  
Operation and maintenance
    59,234       57,293       169,811       170,947  
Transmission wholesale
    25,180       23,434       59,809       54,249  
Depreciation and amortization
    26,081       28,372       72,987       82,639  
Taxes - other than income taxes
    19,126       20,231       54,948       54,527  
Total Operating Expenses
    182,595       194,946       497,103       556,893  
Operating Income
    38,225       41,328       105,379       106,770  
                                 
Other Income and (Deductions), net (Note H)
    4,757       5,562       15,427       14,180  
                                 
Interest Charges, net
                               
Interest on long-term debt
    9,885       10,134       29,896       28,088  
Other interest, net
    1,286       169       1,202       592  
      11,171       10,303       31,098       28,680  
Amortization of debt expense and redemption premiums
    415       379       1,244       1,122  
Total Interest Charges, net
    11,586       10,682       32,342       29,802  
                                 
                                 
Income Before Income Taxes, Equity Earnings
    31,396       36,208       88,464       91,148  
                                 
Income Taxes (Note E)
    14,220       15,222       38,587       36,657  
                                 
Income Before Equity Earnings
    17,176       20,986       49,877       54,491  
Income (Loss) from Equity Investments
    3,521       345       8,230       (544 )
                                 
Net Income
  $ 20,697     $ 21,331     $ 58,107     $ 53,947  
 
The accompanying Notes to the Financial
Statements are an integral part of the financial statements.
 
 
3

 
 
THE UNITED ILLUMINATING COMPANY
BALANCE SHEET
 
ASSETS
(In Thousands)
(Unaudited)
 
   
September 30,
2011
   
September 30,
2010
 
Current Assets
           
Unrestricted cash and temporary cash investments
  $ 6,529     $ 40,505  
Restricted cash
    5,891       1,643  
Utility accounts receivable less allowance of $3,400 and $4,200, respectively
    96,256       103,681  
Unbilled revenues
    41,749       38,918  
Current regulatory assets
    43,315       39,870  
Deferred income taxes
    18,343       16,070  
Refundable taxes, net
    18,484       -  
Current portion of derivative assets (Note A), (Note K)
    10,375       6,620  
Prepayments
    9,300       7,568  
Other current assets
    17,915       16,215  
Total Current Assets
    268,157       271,090  
                 
Other investments
               
Equity investment in related party (Note H)
    132,860       54,972  
Other
    5,364       7,835  
Total Other investments
    138,224       62,807  
                 
Net Property, Plant and Equipment
    1,466,951       1,250,824  
                 
Regulatory Assets (future amounts due from customers through the ratemaking process)
    663,734       597,796  
                 
Deferred Charges and Other Assets
               
Unamortized debt issuance expenses
    6,621       6,678  
Related party note receivable (Note H)
    -       61,433  
Other long-term receivable
    1,279       1,282  
Derivative assets (Note A), (Note K)
    74,359       29,963  
Other
    8,957       352  
Total Deferred Charges and Other Assets
    91,216       99,708  
                 
Total Assets
  $ 2,628,282     $ 2,282,225  
 
The accompanying Notes to the Financial
Statements are an integral part of the financial statements.
 
 
4

 
 
THE UNITED ILLUMINATING COMPANY
BALANCE SHEET
 
LIABILITIES AND CAPITALIZATION
(In Thousands)
(Unaudited)

   
September 30,
2011
   
September 30,
2010
 
Current Liabilities
           
Line of credit borrowings
  $ 120,000     $ -  
Current portion of long-term debt
    -       61,233  
Accounts payable
    129,619       87,002  
Dividends payable
    21,000       20,000  
Accrued liabilities
    29,053       29,609  
Current regulatory liabilities
    36,303       26,033  
Interest accrued
    8,464       8,501  
Taxes accrued
    -       22,571  
Current portion of derivative liabilities (Note A), (Note K)
    28,301       8,618  
Total Current Liabilities
    372,740       263,567  
                 
Noncurrent Liabilities
               
Pension accrued
    119,390       142,372  
Connecticut Yankee contract obligation
    15,030       18,818  
Other post-retirement benefits accrued
    51,237       49,435  
Derivative liabilities (Note A), (Note K)
    259,418       123,228  
Other
    16,593       15,440  
Total Noncurrent Liabilities
    461,668       349,293  
                 
Deferred Income Taxes (future tax liabilities owed to taxing authorities)
    380,527       305,625  
                 
                 
Regulatory Liabilities (future amounts owed to customers through the ratemaking process)
    72,658       82,527  
                 
Commitments and Contingencies (Note J)
               
                 
Capitalization (Note B)
               
Long-term debt
    670,460       670,460  
                 
Common Stock Equity
               
Common stock
    1       1  
Paid-in capital
    529,730       469,730  
Retained earnings
    140,498       141,022  
Net Common Stock Equity
    670,229       610,753  
                 
Total Capitalization
    1,340,689       1,281,213  
                 
Total Liabilities and Capitalization
  $ 2,628,282     $ 2,282,225  
 
The accompanying Notes to the Financial
Statements are an integral part of the financial statements.
 
 
5

 

THE UNITED ILLUMINATING COMPANY
STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
(In Thousands)
(Unaudited)

   
Nine Months Ended
September 30,
 
   
2011
   
2010
 
Cash Flows From Operating Activities
           
Net income
  $ 58,107     $ 53,947  
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
               
Depreciation and amortization
    74,231       83,761  
Deferred income taxes
    37,809       17,697  
Stock-based compensation expense (Note A)
    1,893       2,361  
Pension expense
    17,998       20,287  
Allowance for funds used during construction (AFUDC) - equity
    (7,434 )     (4,716 )
Undistributed (earnings) losses in equity investments
    (8,230 )     544  
Other non-cash items, net
    (15,337 )     7,896  
Changes in:
               
Accounts receivable, net
    (4,762 )     (23,808 )
Unbilled revenues
    1,680       9,457  
Prepayments
    (5,623 )     (3,913 )
Accounts payable
    21,936       (6,634 )
Interest accrued
    (2,447 )     1,204  
Taxes accrued
    (284 )     7,101  
Accrued liabilities
    (13,703 )     (4,940 )
Accrued pension
    (48,291 )     (3,550 )
Other assets
    (677 )     (333 )
Other liabilities
    (2,634 )     1,582  
Total Adjustments
    46,125       103,996  
Net Cash provided by Operating Activities
    104,232       157,943  
                 
Cash Flows from Investing Activities
               
Related party note receivable (Note H)
    (1,050 )     (9,200 )
Plant expenditures including AFUDC debt
    (174,458 )     (130,545 )
Changes in restricted cash
    (3,492 )     2,053  
Deposits in New England East West Solution (NEEWS) (Note C)
    (1,623 )     -  
Investment in GenConn
    1,134       -  
Net Cash (used in) Investing Activities
    (179,489 )     (137,692 )
                 
Cash Flows from Financing Activities
               
Issuances of long-term debt
    1,050       109,000  
Equity infusion from parent
    60,000       -  
Line of credit borrowings (repayments)
    120,000       -  
Payment of common stock dividend
    (48,600 )     (37,800 )
Payment on long-term debt
    (62,833 )     (55,540 )
Other
    (48 )     (754 )
Net Cash provided by Financing Activities
    69,569       14,906  
                 
Unrestricted Cash and Temporary Cash Investments:
               
Net change for the period
    (5,688 )     35,157  
Balance at beginning of period
    12,217       5,348  
Balance at end of period
  $ 6,529     $ 40,505  
                 
Non-cash investing activity:
               
Plant expenditures included in ending accounts payable
  $ 40,998     $ 29,336  
Related party note receivable (Note H)
  $ 62,833     $ 55,540  
Equity investment in Related Party (Note H)
  $ (62,833 )   $ (55,540 )

The accompanying Notes to the Financial
Statements are an integral part of the financial statements.
 
 
6

 
 
THE UNITED ILLUMINATING COMPANY
STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDER'S EQUITY
September 30, 2011 and 2010
(Thousands of Dollars)
(Unaudited)
 
   
Common Stock
   
Paid-in
   
Retained
       
   
Shares
   
Amount
   
Capital
   
Earnings
   
Total
 
Balance as of September 30, 2009
    100     $ 1     $ 458,730     $ 138,592     $ 597,323  
                                         
Net income
                            46,073       46,073  
Cash dividends
                            (43,643 )     (43,643 )
Equity infusion from parent
                    11,000               11,000  
Balance as of September 30, 2010
    100     $ 1     $ 469,730     $ 141,022     $ 610,753  
                                         
Net income
                            69,076       69,076  
Cash dividends
                            (69,600 )     (69,600 )
Equity infusion from parent
                    60,000               60,000  
Balance as of September 30, 2011
    100     $ 1     $ 529,730     $ 140,498     $ 670,229  

The accompanying Notes to the Financial
Statements are an integral part of the financial statements.
 
 
7

 
 
THE UNITED ILLUMINATING COMPANY

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (UNAUDITED)
 
In July 2011, as a result of Connecticut Public Act 11-80 (PA 11-80), the Department of Energy and Environmental Protection (DEEP) was created by merging the Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) and the Department of Public Utility Control (DPUC).  As part of the reorganization, the DPUC became the Public Utilities Regulatory Authority (PURA) and, as PURA, it will continue to be responsible for the rate review and compliance of regulated utilities in Connecticut.  The term PURA will be used in this filing to refer to PURA’s future actions as well as the actions of its predecessor organization, the DPUC and the term DEEP will be used in this filing to refer to DEEP’s actions as well as the actions of its predecessor organization, the DEP.

(A)  BUSINESS ORGANIZATION AND STATEMENT OF ACCOUNTING POLICIES

The United Illuminating Company (UI), a wholly owned subsidiary of UIL Holdings Corporation (UIL Holdings), is a regulated operating electric public utility established in 1899. It is engaged principally in the purchase, transmission, distribution and sale of electricity for residential, commercial and industrial purposes.

UI is also a 50-50 joint venturer with NRG Energy, Inc. (NRG) in GCE Holding LLC, whose wholly owned subsidiary, GenConn Energy LLC (GenConn) was chosen by PURA to build and operate new peaking generation plants in Devon (GenConn Devon) and Middletown (GenConn Middletown), to help address Connecticut’s need for power generation during the heaviest load periods.

Accounting Records

The accounting records of UI are maintained in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAP).

The accounting records for UI are also maintained in accordance with the uniform systems of accounts prescribed by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) and the PURA.

Basis of Presentation

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to use estimates and assumptions that affect (1) the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and (2) the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period.  Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Certain immaterial amounts that were reported in the Financial Statements in previous periods have been reclassified to conform to the current presentation.

Derivatives

UI is party to contracts and involved in transactions that have been determined to be derivatives and are discussed below.
 
 
8

 
 
THE UNITED ILLUMINATING COMPANY

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (UNAUDITED)
 
The fair value of the gross derivative assets and liabilities as of September 30, 2011 and 2010 were as follows:

   
September 30, 2011
 
   
(In Thousands)
 
                         
   
Current Assets
   
Deferred Charges
and Other Assets
   
Current
Liabilities
   
Noncurrent
Liabilities
 
                         
Derivative assets/(liabilities), gross
  $ 10,375     $ 74,359     $ (28,301 )   $ (259,418 )
                                 
   
September 30, 2010
 
   
(In Thousands)
 
                           
   
Current Assets
   
Deferred Charges
and Other Assets
   
Current
Liabilities
   
Noncurrent
Liabilities
 
                                 
Derivative assets/(liabilities), gross
  $ 6,620     $ 29,963     $ (8,618 )   $ (123,228 )
 
Contracts for Differences (CfDs)

As directed by PURA, UI and Connecticut Light and Power (CL&P) each executed two CfDs.  The cost of the contracts will be paid by customers and will be subject to a cost-sharing agreement whereby approximately 20% of the cost is borne by UI customers and approximately 80% by CL&P customers.  As of September 30, 2011, UI has recorded the following amounts in the accompanying Balance Sheet related to its CfDs:  a gross derivative asset of $84.7 million, a regulatory asset of $203.0 million and a gross derivative liability of $287.7 million ($181.8 million of which related to its portion of CL&P’s derivative liabilities).  See Note (K) “Fair Value Measurements” for additional CfD information.

On February 7, 2010, an explosion occurred at the construction site of a 620-megawatt plant being built by Kleen Energy Systems, LLC (Kleen), one of four capacity resources selected in 2008 by PURA to create new or incremental capacity resources.  CL&P has executed the CfD with the Kleen project which is subject to the cost-sharing agreement between UI and CL&P.  In July 2011, Kleen reported that the rebuilding of its facility is complete and that commercial operation of the facility commenced on July 19, 2011, at which time payments under the CfD began.

The unrealized gains and losses from mark-to-market adjustments to derivatives recorded in regulatory assets or regulatory liabilities for the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2011 and 2010 were as follows:

   
Three Months Ended
September 30,
   
Nine Months Ended
September 30,
 
   
2011
   
2010
   
2011
   
2010
 
   
(In Thousands)
   
(In Thousands)
 
                         
Regulatory Assets - Derivative liabilities
  $ 17,753     $ 21,006     $ 88,289     $ (36,547 )
                                 
Regulatory Liabilities - Derivative assets
  $ (11 )   $ 502     $ 5,737     $ 409  
 
Equity Investments

In February 2008, UI and an NRG affiliate formed GenConn, a 50-50 joint venture, for the purpose of constructing peaking generation plants in Connecticut.  UI’s investment in GenConn is being accounted for as an equity investment, the carrying value of which was $132.9 million and $55.0 million as of September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively.  The loans UI made to GenConn for the construction of GenConn Middletown of approximately $63 million were converted into equity in July 2011.

UI’s income (loss) from its equity investment in GenConn was $8.2 million and ($0.5) million for the nine month periods ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively.  For the three month periods ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, such income was $3.5 million and $0.4 million, respectively.  UI received distributions of $3.1 million and $2.2 million from GenConn in September 2011 and October 2011, respectively.

 
9

 
 
THE UNITED ILLUMINATING COMPANY

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (UNAUDITED)
 
Income Taxes

Effective January 1, 2011, UI changed its method of accounting for income taxes for interim reporting periods from the discrete-period approach to the estimated annual effective tax rate approach as defined in ASC 740 “Income Taxes.”  The change conforms the methodology for determining income tax expense for interim periods for UIL Holdings and all of its subsidiaries.  The change in accounting is being reflected in the interim financial statements through retrospective application and does not impact annual reporting.  The impact of this change for the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2010 was a reduction of income tax expense in the amount of $0.2 million and $1.2 million, respectively.

Regulatory Accounting

UI’s regulatory assets and liabilities as of September 30, 2011 and 2010 included the following:
 
   
Remaining
Period
 
September 30,
2011
   
September 30,
2010
 
       
(In Thousands)
 
Regulatory Assets:
               
Nuclear plant investments – above market
 
(a)
  $ 278,054     $ 298,500  
Income taxes due principally to book-tax differences
 
(b)
    2,574       29,313  
Connecticut Yankee
 
5 years
    15,030       18,818  
Unamortized redemption costs
 
11 to 23 years
    13,106       13,908  
Pension and other post-retirement benefit plans
 
(c)
    161,962       156,563  
Contracts for differences
 
(d)
    202,997       101,185  
Excess generation service charge
 
(e)
    5,957       4,263  
Storm costs
 
(g)
    27,080       6,193  
Other
 
(b)
    289       8,923  
Total regulatory assets
        707,049       637,666  
Less current portion of regulatory assets
        43,315       39,870  
Regulatory Assets, Net
      $ 663,734     $ 597,796  
                     
Regulatory Liabilities:
                   
Accumulated deferred investment tax credits
 
33 years
  $ 4,795     $ 4,941  
Deferred gain on sale of property
 
(a)
    37,798       37,798  
Middletown/Norwalk local transmission network service collections
 
39 years
    22,691       23,265  
Pension and other post-retirement benefit plans
 
4 to 8 years
    3,303       2,186  
Deferred transmission expense
 
(f)
    27,498       21,171  
Other
 
(b)
    12,876       19,199  
Total regulatory liabilities
        108,961       108,560  
Less current portion of regulatory liabilities
        36,303       26,033  
Regulatory Liabilities, Net
      $ 72,658     $ 82,527  

(a) Asset/Liability relates to the Competitive Transition Assessment (CTA).  Total CTA costs recovery is currently projected to be completed in 2015, with stranded cost amortization expected to end in 2013.  The remaining balances will be fully offset by amounts primarily included in income taxes due principally to book-tax differences.
(b) Amortization period and/or balance vary depending on the nature, cost of removal and/or remaining life of the underlying assets/liabilities.
(c) Asset life is dependent upon timing of final pension plan distribution; balance is recalculated each year in accordance with ASC 715 "Compensation-Retirement Benefits" (Note G).
(d) Asset life is equal to delivery term of related contracts (which vary from approximately 9 - 16 years); balance fluctuates based upon quarterly market analysis performed on the related derivatives (Note K).
(e) Working capital allowance for generation service charge; this amount fluctuates based upon cash inflows and outflows in a given period.
(f)  Regulatory asset or liability which defers transmission income or expense and fluctuates based upon actual revenues and revenue requirements.
(g) Storm costs include accumulated costs for major storms occurring from January 2009 forward. UI will seek recovery of these costs in future rate proceedings.

 
10

 
 
THE UNITED ILLUMINATING COMPANY

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (UNAUDITED)
 
Stock-Based Compensation

Certain members of management participate in the UIL Holdings 2008 Stock and Incentive Compensation Plan.  Total UI stock-based compensation expense for the nine month periods ended September 30, 2011 and 2010 was $1.9 million and $2.4 million, respectively. Total UI stock-based compensation expense for the three month periods ended September 30, 2011 and 2010 was $0.1 million and $0.8 million, respectively.

Variable Interest Entities

UI has identified GenConn as a variable interest entity (VIE), which is accounted for under the equity method.  UI is not the primary beneficiary of GenConn, as defined in ASC 810 “Consolidation,” because it shares control of all significant activities of GenConn with its joint venturer, NRG.  As such, GenConn is not subject to consolidation.  GenConn recovers its costs through contract for difference agreements, which are cost of service based and have been approved by PURA.  As a result, with the achievement of commercial operation by GenConn Devon and GenConn Middletown, UI’s exposure to loss is primarily related to the potential for unrecovered GenConn operating or capital costs in a regulatory proceeding, of which 50% would be passed through to UI.  Such exposure to loss cannot be determined at this time. For further discussion of GenConn, see “–Equity Investments” as well as Note (C) “Regulatory Proceedings – Electric Distribution and Transmission – Equity Investment in Peaking Generation.”

New Accounting Pronouncements

In May 2011, the FASB issued amendments to ASC 820 “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures.”  Some of the amendments clarify the FASB’s intent about the application of existing fair value measurement requirements and others change a particular principle or requirement for measuring fair value or for disclosing information about fair value measurements.  This guidance is effective during interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2011 and is to be applied on a prospective basis.  The implementation of this guidance is not expected to have a material impact on UI’s financial statements.

(B)  CAPITALIZATION

Common Stock

UI had 100 shares of common stock, no par value, outstanding at September 30, 2011 and 2010.

Long-Term Debt
 
In July 2011, UI repaid, upon maturity, approximately $63 million of borrowings under its equity bridge loan (EBL) relating to GenConn.  The EBL was used by UI to fund its commitments as a 50-50 joint venturer in GenConn.

(C)  REGULATORY PROCEEDINGS
 
Tropical Storm Irene, which passed through Connecticut on August 28, 2011, caused extensive damage to the electric system in UI’s service territory and left approximately 158,000 of UI’s estimated 325,000 customers without electricity.  PURA has opened an investigation of the service response and communications of UI, among other utilities, following power outages resulting from Tropical Storm Irene.  In accordance with PURA regulatory decisions and past storm cost guidance, UI has established a regulatory asset for its storm-related expenses.  As of September 30, 2011, UI’s estimate of the cost of repairing the damage and restoring service to customers is approximately $20 million, of which approximately $4 million has been capitalized.  UI expects to seek recovery of these costs in future rate proceedings.
 
 
11

 
 
THE UNITED ILLUMINATING COMPANY

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (UNAUDITED)
 
Rates

In rulings throughout 2009, PURA issued its final decision regarding UI’s application requesting an increase in distribution rates (the 2009 Decisions), the results of which provided for an allowed distribution return on equity of 8.75%, a decrease from the previously approved 9.75%, and a capital structure of 50% equity and 50% debt, compared to the previously approved 48% equity and 52% debt capital structure.  The 2009 Decisions continued the prior earnings sharing mechanism structure, applying to the new 8.75% allowed return, whereby 50% of any earnings over the allowed twelve month level is returned to customers and 50% is retained by UI.  Additionally, the 2009 Decisions provided for a two year pilot program for full decoupling of distribution revenues from sales.

On April 1, 2010, UI filed its ratemaking proposal and underlying decoupling analysis for the 2009 rate year ended February 3, 2010.  On September 1, 2010, PURA issued its final decision in this matter approving a decoupling charge totaling approximately $1.6 million to be recovered from ratepayers over a twelve month period commencing in October 2010.  In addition to the decoupling charge, PURA also approved a pension and earnings sharing over-recovery credit totaling approximately $3.6 million to be refunded to ratepayers over the same twelve month period commencing in October 2010.  PURA also approved the continuance of the decoupling pilot program beyond the 2010 rate year and until such time that a final decision is reached regarding whether to continue, modify or terminate the decoupling mechanism.  UI filed its 2010 rate year decoupling results with PURA on April 4, 2011 and on August 31, 2011 PURA issued a final decision approving a decoupling adjustment totaling approximately $1.4 million to be credited to ratepayers over a twelve month period beginning in October 2011 and extending the decoupling pilot until UI’s next general rate proceeding.

In December 2010, UI received a letter ruling approving rates effective January 1, 2011 incorporating the 2009 distribution rate changes mentioned above along with previously approved changes to the Generation Services Charges (GSC), Non-Bypassable Federally Mandated Congestion Charges, transmission and systems benefits charges.  Additionally, last resort service GSC rates have been approved for the period through December 31, 2011.  On June 23, 2011, PURA approved revised retail transmission rates, effective July 1, 2011.

Power Supply Arrangements

UI has wholesale power supply agreements in place for the supply of all of its standard service customers for all of 2011 and 2012 and 20% of 2013.  Supplier of last resort service is procured on a quarterly basis.  UI determined that its contracts for standard service and supplier of last resort service are derivatives under ASC 815 “Derivatives and Hedging” and also qualify for the “normal purchase, normal sale” exception under ASC 815.  As such, UI regularly assesses the accounting treatment for its power supply contracts.  These wholesale power supply agreements contain default provisions that include required performance assurance, including certain collateral obligations, which take effect if UI’s credit rating on senior debt falls below investment grade.  In October 2011, Moody’s Investor Services released its updated credit opinion for UI and maintained its Baa2 rating with a stable outlook.  In May 2011, Standard & Poor’s released its updated credit opinion for UI, maintaining its BBB rating with a stable outlook.  If UI’s credit rating were to decline one rating and UI were to be placed on negative credit watch, monthly amounts due and payable to the power suppliers would be accelerated to semi-monthly payments.  UI’s credit rating would have to decline two ratings to fall below investment grade at either rating service.  If this were to occur, UI would have to deliver collateral security in an amount equal to the receivables due to the sellers for the thirty day period immediately preceding the default notice.  If such a situation had been in effect as of September 30, 2011, UI would have had to post approximately $12.3 million in collateral.

Transmission Return on Equity (ROE)

On September 30, 2011, several New England governmental entities, including PURA, the Connecticut Attorney General and the Connecticut Office of Consumer Counsel (collectively, the complainants), filed a complaint with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (the FERC) against ISO-NE and New England transmission owners, including UI, claiming that the current approved base ROE on transmission investments of 11.14% is not just and reasonable and seeking a reduction of the base ROE to 9.20%.  While the FERC has not yet set a refund effective date, complainants have agreed, at ISO-NE’s request, to a refund effective date of October 1, 2011.  The New England transmission owners filed their response to the complaint on October 20, 2011, opposing any change to the base ROE as unsupported.  UI is unable to predict the outcome of this proceeding at this time.

 
12

 
 
THE UNITED ILLUMINATING COMPANY

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (UNAUDITED)
New England East-West Solution

Pursuant to an agreement with CL&P (the Agreement), UI has the right to invest in, and own transmission assets associated with, the Connecticut portion of CL&P’s New England East West Solution (NEEWS) projects to improve regional energy reliability.  NEEWS consists of four inter-related transmission projects being developed by subsidiaries of Northeast Utilities (NU), the parent company of CL&P, in collaboration with National Grid USA.  Three of the projects have portions sited in Connecticut:  (1) the Greater Springfield Reliability Project, (2) the Interstate Reliability Project and (3) the Central Connecticut Reliability Project.  In May 2011, the FERC issued an order authorizing NU’s recovery of and return on 100% of the transmission construction work in progress costs for the NEEWS projects, which resulted in a change in NU’s NEEWS project cost estimate.

Under the terms of the Agreement, UI has the option to make quarterly deposits to CL&P in exchange for ownership of specific transmission assets as they are placed in service.  UI has the right to invest up to the greater of $60 million or an amount equal to 8.4% of CL&P’s costs for the Connecticut portions of the NEEWS projects.  Based upon the current projected costs, this amount is approximately $60 million.  As assets are placed in service, CL&P will transfer title to certain transmission assets to UI in proportion to its investments, but CL&P will continue to maintain these portions of the transmission system pursuant to an operating and maintenance agreement with UI.  Also, under the terms of the Agreement, there are certain circumstances under which CL&P can terminate the Agreement. Such termination would have no affect on the assets previously transferred to UI.

As of November 7, 2011, UI has made deposits totaling $9.6 million in NEEWS and expects to make the remaining deposits over a period of three to five years, depending on the timing and amount of CL&P’s capital expenditures and the projects’ in service dates.

Equity Investment in Peaking Generation

UI is a 50-50 joint venturer with NRG in GCE Holding LLC, whose wholly owned subsidiary, GenConn, was chosen by PURA to build and operate two new peaking generation plants to help address Connecticut’s need for power generation during the heaviest load periods.  The two new peaking generation projects are located at NRG’s existing Connecticut plant locations in Devon and Middletown and are both operating in the ISO-New England markets.  PURA has approved 2011 revenue requirements for GenConn Devon of $36.8 million for the period of January 1, 2011 through December 31, 2011 and for GenConn Middletown of $22.6 million for the period of June 1, 2011 through December 31, 2011.

GenConn filed a revenue requirements request with PURA on July 29, 2011, seeking approval of 2012 revenue requirements for the period commencing January 1, 2012 for both the GenConn Devon and GenConn Middletown facilities.  A final decision on this request is expected by the end of 2011.

(D)  SHORT-TERM CREDIT ARRANGEMENTS

As of September 30, 2011, UI had $120 million of borrowings outstanding under the revolving credit agreement, dated as of November 17, 2010, entered into by and among UIL Holdings and its regulated subsidiaries including UI, together with a group of banks named therein (the Credit Facility).  UI has an outstanding standby letter of credit in the amount of $0.4 million, which expires on December 31, 2011.  Available credit under the Credit Facility at September 30, 2011 totaled $129.6 million for UI.  UI records borrowings under the Credit Facility as short-term debt, but the Credit Facility provides for longer term commitments from banks allowing UI to borrow and reborrow funds, at its option, until its expiration on November 17, 2014, thus affording UI flexibility in managing its working capital requirements.

(E)  INCOME TAXES

The combined statutory federal and state income tax rate for UI during the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2011 and 2010 was 40.4%.

 
13

 
 
THE UNITED ILLUMINATING COMPANY

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (UNAUDITED)

Differences in the treatment of certain transactions for book and tax purposes occur which cause the rate of UIL Holdings’ reported income tax expense to differ from the statutory tax rate described above.  The effective book income tax rates for the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2011 were 40.7% and 39.9%, as compared to 41.6% and 40.5% for the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2010.
 
(G)  PENSION AND OTHER BENEFITS

The United Illuminating Company Pension Plan (the UI Pension Plan) covers the majority of employees of UIL Corporate and UI.  UI also has a non-qualified supplemental pension plan for certain employees and a non-qualified retiree-only pension plan for certain early retirement benefits.  During the nine months ended September 30, 2011, UIL Holdings contributed $48.1 million to the UI Pension Plan.  Additional contributions during the remainder of 2011 are expected to be approximately $4.1 million.

UI has established a supplemental retirement benefit trust and through this trust purchased life insurance policies on certain officers of UI to fund the future liability under the non-qualified supplemental plan.  The cash surrender value of these policies is included in “Other investments” on the Balance Sheet.

The following tables represent the components of net periodic benefit cost for pension and other postretirement benefits (OPEB) for the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2011 and 2010:

   
Three Months Ended September 30,
 
   
Pension Benefits
   
Other Postretirement Benefits
 
   
2011
   
2010
   
2011
   
2010
 
   
(In Thousands)
 
Components of net periodic benefit cost:
                       
Service cost
  $ 1,849     $ 1,781     $ 358     $ 340  
Interest cost
    5,298       5,272       962       982  
Expected return on plan assets
    (5,474 )     (4,767 )     (425 )     (438 )
Amortization of:
                               
Prior service costs
    162       162       (25 )     (26 )
Transition obligation  (asset)
    -       -       255       265  
Actuarial (gain) loss
    3,507       3,078       502       488  
Net periodic benefit cost
  $ 5,342     $ 5,526     $ 1,627     $ 1,611  

   
Nine Months Ended September 30,
 
   
Pension Benefits
   
Other Postretirement Benefits
 
   
2011
   
2010
   
2011
   
2010
 
   
(In Thousands)
 
Components of net periodic benefit cost:
                       
Service cost
  $ 5,547     $ 5,342     $ 1,073     $ 1,020  
Interest cost
    15,896       15,816       2,886       2,947  
Expected return on plan assets
    (16,423 )     (14,300 )     (1,277 )     (1,315 )
Amortization of:
                               
Prior service costs
    483       485       (76 )     (77 )
Transition obligation  (asset)
    -       -       765       794  
Actuarial (gain) loss
    10,523       9,232       1,506       1,463  
Net periodic benefit cost
  $ 16,026     $ 16,575     $ 4,877     $ 4,832  
 
 
14

 
 
THE UNITED ILLUMINATING COMPANY

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (UNAUDITED)
 
The following actuarial weighted-average assumptions were used in calculating net periodic benefit cost for the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2011 and 2010:
 
   
Three and Nine Months Ended September 30,
 
   
Pension Benefits
   
Other Postretirement Benefits
 
   
2011
   
2010
   
2011
   
2010
 
Discount rate
    5.10% - 5.35 %     5.65% - 5.85 %     5.30 %     5.80 %
Average wage increase
    3.80 %     3.80 %     N/A       N/A  
Return on plan assets
    8.25 %     8.50 %     8.25 %     8.50 %
Composite health care trend rate (current year)
    N/A       N/A       8.50 %     9.50 %
Composite health care trend rate (2019 forward)
    N/A       N/A       5.00 %     5.00 %
                                 
N/A – not applicable
                               
 
(H)  RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

UI is a 50-50 joint venturer with NRG in GCE Holding LLC, whose wholly owned subsidiary, GenConn, was chosen by PURA to build and operate new peaking generation plants to help address Connecticut’s need for power generation during the heaviest load periods.  GenConn executed a promissory note (the Loan) with UI under which UI advanced up to an aggregate principal amount of $48.5 million to fund GenConn’s construction and other cash needs until permanent financing was arranged.  In connection with the EBL obtained by UI and the project financing obtained by GenConn on April 27, 2009, all outstanding balances on the Loan were replaced by a new promissory note, the balance of which was converted to an equity investment in July 2011.  See Note (B) “Capitalization – Long-Term Debt” for further discussion regarding the EBL.  Additionally, $1.2 million and $2.8 million of interest income related to the promissory note are included in “Other Income and (Deductions), net” in the accompanying Statements of Income, for the nine month periods ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively, which is offset by the interest expense incurred by UI under the EBL.  For the three month periods ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, such interest income was $0.2 million and $1.0 million, respectively.

A director of UIL Holdings holds a beneficial interest in the building located at 157 Church Street, New Haven, Connecticut, where UI leases office space. UI’s lease payments for this office space for the nine month periods ended September 30, 2011 and 2010 totaled $7.0 million and $7.8 million, respectively.  For the three month periods ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, such lease payments totaled $2.0 million and $2.6 million, respectively.

Inter-company Transactions

UI receives certain services from, and enters into certain inter-company transactions with, UIL Holdings.  Such services primarily consist of Finance and Accounting, Legal, Information Technology and Human Resources.  Such transactions primarily relate to payroll, outside professional services and stock based compensation.  Costs of the services that are allocated amongst UI and UIL Holdings are based on actual direct costs incurred by the respective company, which are settled at the end of each month by way of inter-company billings and wire transfers.  At September 30, 2011 and 2010, the Balance Sheet reflects inter-company receivables of $2.9 million and $0.4 million, respectively, and inter-company payables of $23.8 million and $3.3 million, respectively.

Dividends/Capital Contributions

In 2011 and 2010, UI made wire transfers to UIL Holdings on a quarterly basis, representing an amount approximately equal to UI’s forecasted net income, in order to maintain its capitalization structure as allowed per the 2008 Rate Case.  For the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, UI accrued dividends to UIL Holdings of $56.3 million and $48.8 million, respectively.

(J)  COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Company

UI has a 9.5% stock ownership share in the Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Company (Connecticut Yankee), the carrying value of which was $0.2 million as of September 30, 2011.  In 1996, the Board of Directors of Connecticut Yankee voted unanimously to retire the Connecticut Yankee nuclear plant (the Connecticut Yankee Unit) from commercial operation.  Connecticut Yankee updates the cost of its remaining decommissioning activity, which consists primarily of ground water monitoring and nuclear fuel storage, at least annually, and provides UI with a projected recovery schedule depicting annual costs expected to be billed to UI, including a return on investment over the term of the projected recovery period.  The present value of these costs is calculated using UI’s weighted-average cost of capital and, after consideration of recoverability, recorded as a Connecticut Yankee Contract Obligation and a corresponding regulatory asset.  At September 30, 2011, UI has regulatory approval to recover in future rates (through the CTA) its $15.0 million regulatory asset for Connecticut Yankee over a term ending in 2015.

 
15

 
 
THE UNITED ILLUMINATING COMPANY

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (UNAUDITED)
 
DOE Spent Fuel Litigation

In the Nuclear Waste Policy Act of 1982 (the Act), Congress provided for the United States Department of Energy (DOE) to dispose of spent nuclear fuel and other high-level waste (hereinafter, Nuclear Waste) from nuclear generating plants.  In 1983, Connecticut Yankee and the DOE entered into a standard disposal contract mandated by the Act which required the DOE to begin disposing of Connecticut Yankee’s Nuclear Waste by the end of January 1998.

In 1998, Connecticut Yankee filed claims in the United States Court of Federal Claims seeking damages resulting from the breach of the 1983 contracts by the DOE.  In September 2010, the Court issued its decision and awarded Connecticut Yankee damages of $39.7 million for its spent fuel-related costs through 2001.  On November 8, 2010, the DOE appealed the decision to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit and on November 19, 2010 Connecticut Yankee filed a notice of cross-appeal.  UI’s 9.5% ownership share would result in a receipt of approximately $3.8 million which, if awarded, would be refunded to customers.

In December 2007, Connecticut Yankee filed a second set of complaints against the DOE seeking unspecified damages incurred since January 1, 2002 for the DOE’s failure to remove Connecticut Yankee’s spent fuel.  In July 2009, Connecticut Yankee provided the DOE with a second set of damage claims totaling approximately $135 million for damages incurred from January 1, 2002 through December 31, 2008.  UI’s 9.5% ownership share would result in a receipt of approximately $12.8 million which, if awarded, would be refunded to customers.  As an interim measure until the DOE complies with its contractual obligation to dispose of Connecticut Yankee’s spent fuel, Connecticut Yankee constructed an independent spent fuel storage installation (ISFSI), utilizing dry-cask storage, on the site of the Connecticut Yankee Unit and completed the transfer of its Nuclear Waste to the ISFSI in 2005.

Environmental Concerns

In complying with existing environmental statutes and regulations and further developments in areas of environmental concern, including legislation and studies in the fields of water quality, hazardous waste handling and disposal, toxic substances, climate change and electric and magnetic fields, UI may incur substantial capital expenditures for equipment modifications and additions, monitoring equipment and recording devices, and it may incur additional operating expenses.  The total amount of these expenditures is not now determinable.  Environmental damage claims may also arise from the operations of UI.  Significant environmental issues known to UI at this time are described below.

Site Decontamination, Demolition and Remediation Costs

In November 2010, the EPA made inquiry of UI regarding the storage of PCB materials from the time they were brought to UI’s Shelton, CT facility from the field until their shipment to an authorized disposal facility, during the period from 2006 through June of 2010, and the maintenance of an annual document log in connection with the storage.  The Company filed a response to this inquiry and subsequently received a letter of intent from the EPA to file an administrative complaint and assess a civil penalty.  In October 2011, UI paid a civil penalty of an immaterial amount.

In June 2006, UI executed an agreement with the City of Bridgeport and its Redevelopment Authority (the City) for the transfer of title of UI’s Steel Point property to the City.  Pursuant to a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) among UI, the City, and the City’s selected developer for the property, the City and the developer released UI from any further liability with respect to the Steel Point property after title transferred, and the City and/or the developer has indemnified UI for environmental matters related to the Steel Point property.  The Steel Point property includes the land up to the bulkhead.  The MOU provides that there is no indemnity for liability related to contaminated harbor sediments, and UI is not aware of any such claims.  UI would seek to recover any uninsured costs related to such sediments that are UI’s responsibility, to the extent incurred, through the CTA, in accordance with the ratemaking treatment approved in PURA’s July 2006 decision.

 
16

 
 
THE UNITED ILLUMINATING COMPANY

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (UNAUDITED)
 
A site on the Mill River in New Haven was conveyed by UI in 2000 to an unaffiliated entity, Quinnipiac Energy LLC (QE), reserving to UI permanent easements for the operation of its transmission facilities on the site.  At the time of the sale, a fund of approximately $1.9 million, an amount equal to the then-current estimate for remediation, was placed in escrow for purposes of bringing soil and groundwater on the site into compliance with applicable environmental laws.  As of September 30, 2011, approximately $0.1 million of the escrow fund remains.  QE has since sold the property to Evergreen Power, LLC (Evergreen Power) and Asnat Realty LLC (Asnat).  UI is unaware of what agreement was reached between QE and Evergreen Power and Asnat regarding future environmental liability or what remediation activity remains to be undertaken at the site.  In July 2008, Evergreen Power and Asnat submitted a claim to UI seeking compensation for environmental remediation on the property, including the existing building which remains on the site.   UI could be required by applicable environmental laws to complete the remediation of any subsurface contamination at the site if it is determined that QE and/or Evergreen Power and Asnat have not completed the appropriate environmental remediation at the site.  UI has not updated the original $1.9 million remediation estimate, and does not have specific knowledge of any remediation work done, or remaining to be done on behalf of QE or any subsequent owner.  UI cannot presently assess the potential financial impact, if any, of this claim.  As such, as of September 30, 2011, no liability related to this claim has been recorded.

In April 1999, UI completed the sale of its Bridgeport Harbor Station and New Haven Harbor Station generating plants in compliance with Connecticut’s electric utility industry restructuring legislation.  With respect to the portion of the New Haven Harbor Station site that UI retained, UI has performed an additional environmental analysis, indicating that approximately $3.2 million in remediation expenses will be incurred.  Actual remediation costs may be higher or lower than what is currently estimated.  The required remediation is virtually all on transmission-related property and UI has accrued these estimated expenses, which were recovered in transmission rates.

From 1961 to 1976, UI owned a parcel of property in Derby, CT, on which it operated an oil-fired electric generating unit.  For several years, DEEP has been monitoring and remediating a migration of fuel oil contamination from a neighboring parcel of property into the adjacent Housatonic River.  Based on its own investigation to date, UI believes it has no responsibility for this contamination.  If regulatory agencies determine that UI is responsible for the cost of these remediation activities, UI may incur substantial costs, no estimate of which is currently available.

Middletown/Norwalk Transmission Project
 
The general contractor and two subcontractors responsible for civil construction work in connection with the installation of UI’s portion of the Middletown/Norwalk Transmission Project’s underground electric cable system filed lawsuits in the Connecticut state court on September 22, 2009, March 23, 2009 and January 25, 2010, respectively.  The claims, as revised by the general contractor in October 2011, seek payment for change order requests of approximately $33.3 million, a 10% general contractor mark-up on any approved subcontractor change order claims (approximately $2.3 million), interest, costs, and attorneys' fees.   UI is vigorously defending the litigation.  To the extent that UI is required to satisfy any of the change order requests, UI would seek recovery through its transmission revenue requirement.  
 
GenConn

On July 28, 2011, GenConn Devon and the former general contractor responsible for the construction of the GenConn Devon facility executed and delivered a settlement agreement with respect to change order requests and delay and impact claims and pursuant to which GenConn Devon paid a settlement amount of $10.5 million upon satisfaction of certain conditions performed by the former general contractor.  In April 2011, the parties settled a claim by the general contractor for work at the GenConn Middletown facility and executed and delivered a settlement agreement pursuant to which GenConn Middletown paid a settlement amount of $3.0 million.  GenConn will seek and expects to recover the associated costs through its annual regulatory proceeding.  To the extent that there is any financial impact on GenConn, the effect on UI’s Financial Statements will be reflected in the carrying value of UI’s 50% ownership position in GenConn and through “Income (loss) from Equity Investments” in the Statement of Income.

In September 2010, UIL Holdings entered into a Sponsor Guaranty and Payment Agreement (Sponsor Guaranty) in favor of the Royal Bank of Scotland PLC, as Administrative Agent under GenConn’s project financing arrangement, whereby UIL Holdings guaranteed to pay an amount up to $6.0 million in respect of amounts related to the former general contractor’s claims and litigation expenses as they relate to such claims described above.  The settlements described above do not require the Sponsor Guaranty to be drawn upon and the Sponsor Guaranty terminated following payment of the settlement amounts and release of all associated liens.  Given the settlements of the claims as described above, no liability has been recorded as of September 30, 2011.
 
 
17

 
 
THE UNITED ILLUMINATING COMPANY

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (UNAUDITED)
 
Purchase and Sale Agreement

As part of its plan to consolidate operations and office personnel, on July 7, 2011, UI entered into a Purchase and Sale Agreement for the sale of the Electric System Work Center (ESWC) located at 801 Bridgeport Avenue in Shelton, CT for approximately $10.2 million.  UI acquired the ESWC for approximately $16 million and expects to recover any loss resulting from the sale of the property through the regulatory process.  The transaction is expected to close by the first quarter of 2014 and requires PURA approval.  On November 16, 2011, PURA issued a final decision approving the sale.

(K)  FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS

UI utilizes an income approach valuation technique to value the majority of its assets and liabilities measured and reported at fair value.  As required by ASC 820 “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures,” financial assets and liabilities are classified in their entirety, based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement.  UI’s assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement requires judgment, and may affect the valuation of the fair value of assets and liabilities and their placement within the fair value hierarchy levels.

The following tables set forth UI’s financial assets and liabilities, other than pension benefits and OPEB, which were accounted for at fair value on a recurring basis as of September 30, 2011 and 2010.

   
Fair Value Measurements Using
 
   
Quoted Prices in
Active Markets for
Identical Assets
(Level 1)
   
Significant Other
 Observable Inputs
(Level 2)
   
Significant
Unobservable
 Inputs
(Level 3)
   
Total
 
September 30, 2011
 
(In Thousands)
 
Assets:
                       
Derivative assets
  $ -     $ -     $ 84,734     $ 84,734  
Supplemental retirement benefit trust life insurance policies (Note G)
    5,153       -       -       5,153  
    $ 5,153     $ -     $ 84,734     $ 89,887  
                                 
Liabilities:
                               
Derivative liabilities
  $ -     $ -     $ 287,719     $ 287,719  
                                 
Net fair value assets/(liabilities), September 30, 2011
  $ 5,153     $ -     $ (202,985 )   $ (197,832 )
       
September 30, 2010
     
Assets:
                       
Derivative assets
  $ -     $ -     $ 36,583     $ 36,583  
Deferred Compensation Plan
    2,255       -       -       2,255  
Supplemental retirement benefit trust life insurance policies (Note G)
    5,285       -       -       5,285  
    $ 7,540     $ -     $ 36,583     $ 44,123  
                                 
Liabilities:
                               
Derivative liabilities
  $ -     $ -     $ 131,846     $ 131,846  
                                 
Net fair value assets/(liabilities), September 30, 2010
  $ 7,540     $ -     $ (95,263 )   $ (87,723 )

The determination of fair value of the derivative assets and liabilities, which primarily consist of contracts for differences, was based on a probability-based expected cash flow analysis that was discounted at the September 30, 2011 or December 31, 2010 risk-free interest rates, as applicable, and an adjustment for non-performance risk using credit default swap rates.  Certain management assumptions were required, including development of pricing that extended over the term of the contracts.  In addition, UI performed an assessment of risks related to obtaining regulatory, legal and siting approvals, as well as obtaining financing resources and ultimately attaining commercial operation.   PURA has determined that changes in fair value associated with the contracts for differences are fully recoverable.  As a result, such changes have no impact on UI’s  net income.

 
18

 
 
THE UNITED ILLUMINATING COMPANY

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (UNAUDITED)
 
The fair value of the noncurrent investments available for sale is determined using quoted market prices in active markets for identical assets.  The investments primarily consist of money market funds.

Under the UIL Deferred Compensation Plan (DCP), directors, named executive officers and certain other executives may elect to defer certain elements of compensation.  Participants in the DCP are permitted to direct investments of their elective deferral accounts into ‘deemed’ investments consisting of non-publicly traded mutual funds available through variable insurance products, and Company common stock equivalents.  These investments, which are actively traded in sufficient frequency and volume to provide pricing information on an ongoing basis, are marked-to-market in accordance with ASC 815 based upon such pricing information.
 
   
Nine Months Ended
September 30, 2011
 
Net derivative assets/(liabilities), December 31, 2010
  $ (108,959 )
Unrealized gains and (losses), net
    (94,026 )
Net derivative assets/(liabilities), September 30, 2011
  $ (202,985 )
 
The following table sets forth a reconciliation of changes in the net regulatory asset/(liability) balances that were established to recover any unrealized gains/(losses) associated with the contracts for differences for the nine month period ended September 30, 2011.  The amounts offset the net contract for differences liabilities included in the derivative liabilities detailed above.
   
Nine Months Ended
September 30, 2011
 
   
(In Thousands)
 
       
Net regulatory assets/(liabilities), December 31, 2010
  $ 108,959  
Unrealized (gains) and losses, net
    94,026  
Net regulatory assets/(liabilities), September 30, 2011
  $ 202,985  
 
 
19