First Liberty Power Corp - FORM 10-K/A

Attached files

file	filename
EX-31.1 - CERTIFICATION - First Liberty Power Corp	ex311.htm
EX-10.3 - JOHN RUD CONSULTING AGREEMENT - First Liberty Power Corp	ex103.htm
EX-32.1 - CERTIFICATION - First Liberty Power Corp	ex321.htm
EX-31.2 - CERTIFICATION - First Liberty Power Corp	ex312.htm
EX-1.4 - NORTHERN TIGER LOAN AGREEMENTS - First Liberty Power Corp	ex104.htm

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

Form 10-K/A

(Amendment #3)

(Mark One)
[X] ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

	For the fiscal year ended July 31, 2010

[ ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

	For the transition period from __________ to __________

000-52928
Commission File Number

FIRST LIBERTY POWER CORP.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Nevada	90-0748351
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)	(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

7251 W. Lake Mead Blvd, Suite 300, Las Vegas, NV	89128
(Address of principal executive offices)	(Zip Code)

(800) 709-1196
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Exchange Act:
Title of each class	Name of each exchange on which registered
n/a	n/a

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Exchange Act:

Common Stock

Title of class

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.

Yes

[ ]

[X]

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Act.

Yes

[ ]

[X]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Yes

[X]

[ ]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).

Yes

[ ]

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.

Yes

[ ]

[X]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer	[ ]	Accelerated filer	[ ]

Non-accelerated filer	[ ]	Smaller reporting company	[X]
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

Yes

[ ]

[X]

The aggregate market value of voting and non-voting common stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant was approximately $42,000 (based on 840,000 shares held by non-affiliates and a closing market price of $0.05 per share on January 31, 2010) as of January 31, 2010 (the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second quarter), assuming solely for the purpose of this calculation that all directors, officers and greater than 10% stockholders of the registrant are affiliates. The determination of affiliate status for this purpose is not necessarily conclusive for any other purpose.

APPLICABLE ONLY TO REGISTRANTS INVOLVED IN BANKRUPTCY

PROCEEDINGS DURING THE PAST 5 YEARS:

Indicate by check mark whether the issuer has filed all documents and reports required to be filed by Section 12, 13, or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 subsequent to the distribution of securities under a plan confirmed by a court.

Yes

[ ]

APPLICABLE ONLY TO CORPORATE REGISTRANTS

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the registrant’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.

76,210,790 shares of common stock issued and outstanding as of November 11, 2011.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

List hereunder the following documents if incorporated by reference and the Part of the Form 10-K (e.g. Part I, Part II, etc.) into which the document is incorporated: (1) Any annual report to security holders; (2) Any proxy or information statement; and (3) Any prospectus filed pursuant to Rule 424(b) or (c) of the Securities Act of 1933. The listed documents should be clearly described for identification purposes.

None

TABLE OF CONTENTS

		Page
	PART I

Item 1	Business	5
Item 1A	Risk Factors	8
Item 1B	Unresolved Staff Comments	8
Item 2	Properties	8
Item 3	Legal Proceedings	15
Item 4	(Removed and Reserved)	15

	PART II

Item 5	Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities	16
Item 6	Selected Financial Data	17
Item 7	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	17
Item 7A	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	19
Item 8	Financial Statements and Supplementary Data	19

Item 9	Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure	20
Item 9A(T)	Controls and Procedures	20
Item 9B	Other Information	22

	PART III

Item 10	Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance	23
Item 11	Executive Compensation	24
Item 12	Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters	26
Item 13	Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence	27
Item 14	Principal Accounting Fees and Services	27

	PART IV

Item 15	Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules	28

	SIGNATURES	29

Explanatory Note

This Form 10-K/A (Amendment No.3) (“Current Filing”) is being filed by First Liberty Power Corp. (the “Company”) to amend the Company’s Form 10-K/A (Amendment #2) for the year ended July 31, 2010, which was filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) on March 22, 2011.

This Current Filing is being submitted in order to amend aspects of the management discussion and analysis and other elements of the Current Filing impacted by the adjustments made to the audited financial statements as a result of the re-audit required, as detailed in the Explanatory Note to Amendment No. 2, as well as certain events that have occurred subsequent to the original filing. The Company has also addressed in this Current Filing comments received from the SEC in a letter dated February 25, 2011.

Except as noted above, no other attempt has been made in this Amendment to modify or update the other disclosures presented in this Current Filing, which does not reflect events occurring after the filing of the original 10-K (i.e., those events occurring after July 31, 2010 or subsequent event disclosure therein) or modify or update those disclosures that may be affected by subsequent events. Such subsequent matters are addressed in subsequent reports filed with the SEC. Accordingly, this Amendment should be read in conjunction with the Form 10-K, the Form 10-K/A Amendment #1, the Form 10-K/A Amendment #2, and our other current filings with the SEC.

As required by Rule 12b-15 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, new certifications by our principal executive officer and principal financial officer are filed as exhibits to this Amendment.

ITEM 1. BUSINESS

Forward Looking Statements

This Amended Annual Report on Form 10-K/A (“Annual Report”) contains forward-looking statements. These statements relate to future events or our future financial performance. In some cases, you can identify forward-looking statements by terminology such as "may," "should," "expects," "plans," "anticipates," "believes," "estimates," "predicts," "potential," or "continue" or the negative of these terms or other comparable terminology. These statements are only predictions and involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors, including the risks in the section entitled "Risk Factors" and the risks set out below, any of which may cause our or our industry’s actual results, levels of activity, performance or achievements to be materially different from any future results, levels of activity, performance or achievements expressed or implied by these forward-looking statements.

These risks include, by way of example and not in limitation:

·	the uncertainty that we will not be able to successfully identify and evaluate a suitable business opportunity;

·	risks related to the large number of established and well-financed entities that are actively seeking suitable business opportunities;

·	risks related to the failure to successfully manage or achieve growth of a new business opportunity; and

·	other risks and uncertainties related to our business strategy.

This list is not an exhaustive list of the factors that may affect any of our forward-looking statements. These and other factors should be considered carefully and readers should not place undue reliance on our forward-looking statements.

Forward looking statements are made based on management’s beliefs, estimates and opinions on the date the statements are made and we undertake no obligation to update forward-looking statements if these beliefs, estimates and opinions or other circumstances should change. Although we believe that the expectations reflected in the forward-looking statements are reasonable, we cannot guarantee future results, levels of activity, performance or achievements. Except as required by applicable law, including the securities laws of the United States, we do not intend to update any of the forward-looking statements to conform these statements to actual results.

The safe harbors of forward-looking statements provided by Section 21E of the Exchange Act are unavailable to issuers of penny stock. As we issued securities at a price below $5.00 per share, our shares are considered penny stock and such safe harbors set forth under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 are unavailable to us.

Our financial statements are stated in United States dollars and are prepared in accordance with United States generally accepted accounting principles.

In this annual report, unless otherwise specified, all dollar amounts are expressed in United States dollars and all references to "common stock" refer to the common shares in our capital stock.

As used in this Annual Report, the terms "we," "us," “Company,” "our" and "First Liberty" mean First Liberty Power Corp., unless otherwise indicated.

Corporate Information

The address of our principal executive office is 7251 W. Lake Mead Blvd, Suite 300, Las Vegas, NV. Our telephone number is 800-709-1196.

Our common stock is quoted on the OTC Bulletin Board under the symbol "FLPC".

We were incorporated in the State of Nevada under the name “Quuibus Technology, Inc.” on March 28, 2007, to engage in the business of developing and offering a server-based software product for the creation of wireless communities. On November 26, 2009, our founding Directors and officers resigned, and Glyn R. Garner was elected a Director and appointed president, secretary and treasurer of our Company. Due to our inability to commence viable operations in the software production industry, new management of our company began to evaluate various business alternatives available to our company to ensure our survival and to preserve our shareholder’s investment in our common shares.

In accordance with approval by the Board of Directors, effective December 22, 2009, the Nevada Secretary of State effected a forward stock split of our authorized and issued and outstanding shares of common stock on a one (1) old for 27 new basis, such that our authorized capital increased from 20,000,000 shares of common stock with par value of $0.001 to 540,000,000 shares of common stock with a par value of $0.001 and, correspondingly, our issued and outstanding shares of common stock increased from 2,525,000 shares of common stock to 68,175,000 shares of common stock. Also, effective December 22, 2009, we changed our name from “Quuibus Technology, Inc.” to “First Liberty Power Corp.” by way of a merger with our wholly owned subsidiary First Liberty Power Corp. which was formed solely for the purpose of the change of name. The change of name and forward stock split became effective with the Over-the-Counter Bulletin Board at the opening for trading on February 4, 2010, under the new stock symbol “FLPC”. The change of name was effected to better reflect the new business direction of our company.

On December 24, 2009, we entered into two purchase agreements granting our Company exclusive exploration licenses for lithium and lithium carbonate exploration in Nevada and vanadium and uranium exploration in Utah.

On March 1, 2010, we appointed Mr. John Rud as vice-president of exploration of our Company.

On March 11, 2010, the Company closed a private placement for 720,000 units for gross proceeds received through to July 31, 2010 of $260,000 of $360,000 total. Each unit consists of one common share and one share purchase warrant. Each whole common share purchase warrant shall entitle the holder to purchase one share of common stock in the capital of our Company for a period of twenty-four months from closing at a price of $0.50 per warrant share. As of July 31, 2010 these shares and warrants had yet to be issued, though were issued subsequently.

We do not have any subsidiaries.

Other than as set out herein, we have not been involved in any bankruptcy, receivership or similar proceedings, nor have we been a party to any material reclassification, merger, consolidation or purchase or sale of a significant amount of assets not in the ordinary course of our business.

Our Current Business

We are an exploration stage company engaged in the exploration of mineral properties.

On December 24, 2009, we entered into two purchase agreements with GeoXplor Corp. Under the agreements, we have been granted an exclusive exploration license in regards to the mineral properties described in the agreements. One agreement is in regards to claims located in Esmeralda County, Nevada, for Lithium and Lithium Carbonate exploration (the "Lithium Agreement"), and one agreement is in regards to claims located in San Juan County, Utah, for Vanadium and Uranium exploration (the "Van-Ur Agreement"). Pursuant to both Agreements, upon the completion of required payments and work commitments, GeoXplor shall transfer title to the properties to our company and shall retain a 2% royalty, on which we shall have the option to purchase one-half, or 1%, for $1,000,000.

The Properties are undeveloped raw land. We intend to undertake exploration activities on our properties in the hope of finding commercially viable deposits of Lithium / Lithium Carbonate on our first property, and, on the other property, Vanadium and Uranium. We have commenced initial exploration work on both properties, and this will continue to be our principal activity, until and if our minerals of interest are discovered in commercially viable quantities, which would then become our principal products.

Our exploration program will be exploratory in nature and there is no assurance that a commercially viable mineral deposit, a reserve, exists on the property until further exploration, particularly drilling, is undertaken and a comprehensive evaluation concludes economic and legal feasibility. We have not yet generated or realized any revenues from our business operations.

Should we be successful in raising sufficient funds in order to conduct our exploration program, the full extent and cost of which is not presently known beyond that required by our mandatory work programs noted below, and such exploration programs results in an indication that production of our minerals of interest is economically feasible, then at that point in time we would make a determination as to the best and most viable approach for the extraction of the minerals from the respective property.

As all of our minerals of interest are commodity products, they are expected to be readily saleable on an open market at then current prices, therefore we foresee no direct competition per se for the selling of our products, should we ever reach the production stage. However, we would be competing with numerous other companies in the region, in the province, in the country, and globally, for the equipment, manpower, geological expertise, and capital, required to fund, explore, develop, extract, and distribute such minerals.

Our mineral exploration programs are subject to State and Federal regulations, which sets forth rules for: locating claims, posting claims, working claims and reporting work performed. We are also subject to rules on how and where we can explore for minerals. We must comply with these laws to operate our business. Compliance with these rules and regulations will not adversely affect our operations. We are also subject to the numerous laws for the environmental protection of forests, lakes and rivers, fisheries, wild life etc. These codes deal with environmental matters relating to the exploration and development of mining properties. We are responsible to provide a safe working environment, not disrupt archaeological sites, and conduct our activities to prevent unnecessary damage to the property.

We will secure all necessary permits for exploration and, if development is warranted on the properties, will file final plans of operation before we start any mining operations. We anticipate no discharge of water into active stream, creek, river, lake or any other body of water regulated by environmental law or regulation. No endangered species will be disturbed. Restoration of the disturbed land will be completed according to law. All holes, pits and shafts will be sealed upon abandonment of the property. It is difficult to estimate the cost of compliance with the environmental law since the full nature and extent of our proposed activities cannot be determined until we start our operations and know what that will involve from an environmental standpoint. We are in compliance with all regulations at present and will continue to comply in the future. We believe that compliance with these regulations will not adversely affect our business operations in the future.

We intend to subcontract exploration work out to third parties, which are identified below in our more detailed property discussions. We intend to use the services of subcontractors for manual labor exploration work on our Property.

Employees

We have not entered into employment agreements with the officers or directors of the Company.

In order to undertake the administrative and management operations of the Company, the Company has entered into consulting agreements with individuals to provide required services to the Company, with the particulars as follows.

·	On March 1, 2010, the Company entered into a consulting agreement with Mr. John Rud, wherein Mr. Rud has agreed to provide, among other things, consulting services to the Company for a period of 12 months.

·	On May 3 2010, we entered into a consulting agreement with Mr. John Hoak, wherein Mr. Hoak has agreed to provide, among other things, consulting services to the Company. The agreement was effective March 24, 2010 and continues to March 24, 2012.

Available Information

Our Annual Reports on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K. and all amendments to those reports that we file with the Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC, are available at the SEC's public reference room at 100 F Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20549. The public may obtain information on the operation of the public reference room by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. The SEC also maintains a website at www.sec.gov that contains reports, proxy and information statements and other information regarding reporting companies.

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS

As a “smaller reporting company”, we are not required to provide the information required by this Item.

ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS

None.

ITEM 2. PROPERTIES

Executive Offices

The address of our principal executive office is 114 West Magnolia Street, #400 – 136, Bellingham, WA 98225. Our telephone number is 702-990-8402.

Lida Valley Claims, Esmeralda County, NV (“Lithium Property”)

Claims

On December 24, 2009, we entered into a purchase agreements with GeoXplor Corp. Under the agreement, we have been granted an exclusive exploration license in regards to claims located in Esmeralda County, Nevada, for Lithium and Lithium Carbonate exploration (the "Lithium Agreement"). Pursuant to the Lithium Agreement, upon the completion of the required payments and work commitments, GeoXplor shall transfer title to the properties to our company and shall retain a 2% royalty, on which we shall have the option to purchase one-half, or 1%, for $1,000,000.

Our required payments and work commitments are as follows:

(1)	make cash payments of $490,000 over a four year period, of which initial payments of $115,000 have been made as of July 31, 2010, and remaining payments are as follows

o	$75,000 on the 1st year anniversary of 15 December 2010;

o	$100,000 on the 2nd year anniversary of 15 December 2011;

o	$100,000 on the 3rd year anniversary of 15 December 2012;

o	$100,000 on the 4th year anniversary of 15 December 2013;

(2)	issue a total of 1,000,000 restricted shares of common stock over a three year period, of which 250,000 are to have been issued as of July 31, 2010, and;

o	250,000 on the 1st year anniversary of 15 December 2010;

o	250,000 on the 2nd year anniversary of 15 December 2011;

o	250,000 on the 3rd year anniversary of 15 December 2012;

All outstanding share issuances due and payable under this agreement have been issued subsequent to the year end.

(3)	before the expiration of 4 years from 24 December 2009, expend a minimum of $1,000,000 in mineral exploration and development, according to the following schedule:

o	$100,000 before the 1st year anniversary of 15 December 2010;

o	$150,000 before the 2nd year anniversary of 15 December 2011;

o	$350,000 before the 3rd year anniversary of 15 December 2012;

o	$400,000 before the 4th year anniversary of 15 December 2013;

As of July 31, 2010, $85,287 had been expended, leaving $14,713 to be expended prior to 15 December 2010.

The claim block contains 76-180 acre unpatented Placer claims and 8-80 acre placer claims, situated in Esmeralda Country, Nevada, comprising a surface area of 12,800 acres. The NMC numbers are 1012555 through 1012557, and 1012477 through 1012554.

Location and Access

The Lithium Property is located in South Western Nevada, approximately 150 miles north of Las Vegas and within 15 miles of the Montezuma peak. The project area has excellent infrastructure including a network of roads, railroads and cellular telephone coverage.

Regional & Property Geology

Lida Valley is one of a group of inter-mountain basins in west-central Nevada and is surrounded by Cuprite Hills to the Northwest, Stonewall Mountains to the East and Slate Ridge to the Southwest. It has a playa floor of about 12 square miles that receives surface drainage from an area of about 60 square miles. The playa floor contains erosion remnants of Lithium-rich rhyolite tuff and is surrounded by alluvial fan slopes of the mountain ranges. Altitudes range from 4,630 feet on the playa floor to 7,000 feet on the Stonewall Ridge.

The tertiary volcanic rocks are considered to be involved in the origin of the Lithium deposits in south-central Nevada. The volcanism that created the volcanic rocks also provided the heat energy and hydrothermal activity required to mobilize the Lithium from volcanic glass and other relatively unstable minerals. The Tertiary rhyolites from the Montezuma Range and surrounding mountain ranges are considered to be the most lithium rich rhyolites in the world, (MacDonald et. Al; 1992) Transport of the Lithium would require a hydrothermal fluid, surface water or meteoric groundwater. Evaporation concentrated the Lithium in the brine to economic grades which are considered to be in the 100 to 300 ppm range. The Lithium rich water would also alter the playa sediments to form Lithium-rich clays and Lithium rich inclusions in halite.

Exploration

The Company commissioned a gravity survey on the property, total cost of $85,287, undertaken by Hasbrouck Geophysics, Inc. of Prescott, Arizona, which report was completed in June 2010. The gravity survey was conducted for lithium brine exploration over claims Lithium Property claims. The purposes of the survey was to map depth to bedrock or thickness of sediments, map any geologic structures that may be significant to the occurrence of lithium brine, and provide information for the selection and design of additional geophysical surveys.

Interpretation of the modeled gravity data indicates several areas with increased bedrock depths or lower bedrock elevations. These areas may be conducive for concentration of lithium-bearing brines, but the presence, dip and continuity of aquifer beds plus the detailed mapping of any structures both within the sedimentary section and bedrock should be determined through high resolution geophysical means prior to drilling. There are two geophysical approaches recommended in areas selected from the gravity survey: 1) controlled-source audiomagnetotellurics / magnetotellurics (CSAMT/MT) surveys, and 2) reflection seismic surveys.

It is recommended that the CSAMT/MT surveys be conducted first because they will determine if conductive zones, possibly indicative of lithium-bearing brines, are present and continuous. Additionally these surveys may help define aquifer dip. The location(s) of the reflection seismic survey line(s) will be determined from the combined results of the gravity and CSAMT/MT surveys. Reflection seismic is expensive so the survey lines should be placed in the optimum locations. The dip and continuity details of possible lithium-bearing brine beds (e.g., perhaps similar to the Main Ash and Lower Gravel Aquifers in Clayton Valley, amongst others) and structure mapping both within the aquifers and bedrock will be accomplished with the reflection seismic surveys.

The Company is required to undertake a total of a further $914,000 worth of work on the Lithium Property. The next steps for exploration, over the next year, are expected to be further gravity survey work to expand and detail the property coverage, followed by the CSAMT / MT survey. Total cost of these steps is estimated at less than $200,000, and will be undertaken by Hasbrouck Geophysics, Inc., and managed by GeoXplor Inc. If the results are positive for the CSAMT / MT survey, we would expect to proceed directly to drilling, the costs of which is unknown at this time, but likely within our work program requirements.

As of July 31, 2010, the exploration has provided positive indications that additional exploration is warranted, but there are no known or proven reserves, and substantial additional exploration work must be undertaken on the Lithium Property.

At present, the Company does not have sufficient funds for the planned exploration program, and would need to raise additional capital either through obtaining additional loans, or through the sale of its common stock. While no specific agreements are yet in place, the Company expects to be able to raise the required funds for these next 2 phases of the program, though this cannot be assured.

Uravan Claims, San Juan Country, Utah (“Van-Ur Property”)

Claims

On December 24, 2009, we entered into a purchase agreements with GeoXplor Corp. Under the agreement, we have been granted an exclusive exploration license in regards to claims located in San Juan County, Utah, for Vanadium and Uranium exploration (the "Van-Ur Agreement"). Pursuant to the Van-Ur Agreement, upon the completion of the required payments and work commitments, GeoXplor shall transfer title to the properties to our company and shall retain a 2% royalty, on which we shall have the option to purchase one-half, or 1%, for $1,000,000.

Our required payments and work commitments are as follows:

(1)	make cash payments of $480,000 over a four year period, of which initial payments of $80,000 have been made as of July 31, 2010, and remaining payments are as follows

o	$100,000 on the 1st year anniversary of 15 December 2010 ;

o	$100,000 on the 2nd year anniversary of 15 December 2011;

o	$100,000 on the 3rd year anniversary of 15 December 2012;

o	$100,000 on the 4th year anniversary of 15 December 2013;

(2)	issue a total of 1,000,000 restricted shares of common stock over a three year period, of which 250,000 are to have been issued as of July 31, 2010, and;

o	250,000 on the 1st year anniversary of 15 December 2010;

o	250,000 on the 2nd year anniversary of 15 December 2011;

o	250,000 on the 3rd year anniversary of 15 December 2012;

All outstanding share issuances due and payable under this agreement have been issued subsequent to the year end.

(3)	before the expiration of 4 years from 24 December 2009, expend a minimum of $1,000,000 in mineral exploration and development, according to the following schedule:

o	$100,000 before the 1st year anniversary of 15 December 2010;

o	$150,000 before the 2nd year anniversary of 15 December 2011;

o	$350,000 before the 3rd year anniversary of 15 December 2012;

o	$400,000 before the 4th year anniversary of 15 December 2013;

As of July 31, 2010, $9,494 had been expended, leaving $90,506 to be expended prior to 15 December 2010.

The claim block contains 66 vanadium-uranium mineral lode claims, situated in San Juan County, Utah, comprising a surface area of 12,800 acres.

Location and Access

The Uravan Property is located in the northeast corner of San Juan County approximately 40 miles southeast of Moab, Utah. The area is sparsely populated with a small village of La Sal, Utah, about 10 miles west of the claim block. Utah Highway 46, an all-weather paved road provides access to the southern region of the mineral claims. A network of forests roads, drill access roads and jeep trails make most of the claim block accessible year around.

The climate of San Juan County is semi-arid with minor precipitation. The average annual precipitation is 12.83 inches with an average snowfall of 44.5 inches. The snowfalls during November to May occasionally reach 15 inches or more. The Uravan Property is located in the high desert ecosystem with erosional landscape exposing the sandstone formations. Deep canyons with canyon walls composed of alternating erosion-resistant benches and highly erodible slopes, and broad flat benches are the predominant landscape features. Vegetation consists of greasewood, salt bush, rabbit bush with willows and cottonwood in the drainage area.

Regional & Property Geology

The Uravan Mineral claims are located within the Colorado Plateau near the Utah-Colorado border. The Colorado Plateau is a broad area of regional uplift consisting mainly of flat-lying Paleozoic, Mesozoic and Cenozoic sedimentary rocks. The strata is gently folded and faulted by uplift, intrusion and collapse of plastic evaporite formations on the east and by intrusion of laccolithic complexes now composing the La Sal Mountains on the west.

The uranium-vanadium deposits in the La Sal quadrangle occur in the uppermost sandstone of the Salt Wash Member of the Morrison Formation. The ore bearing sandstone range in thickness from a few feet to 100 feet. The sandstone is a medium to fine grained quartzose interbedded with siltstone and mudstone. Near the uranium-vanadium mineralization, the sandstone is white, light gray or light brown, and the siltstone and mudstone are usually light green or gray green.

The uranium-vanadium deposits mined in the nearby producing mines occur in the uppermost sandstone beds within the Salt Wash member of the Morrison Formation. This unit is commonly called the ore-bearing sandstone or third rim in reference to its position above the Entrada Sandstone.

The ore-bearing sandstone is composed of a single broad lens of cross-laminated sandstone ranging from 0 to 30 feet in thickness. In others area it is composed of overlapping sandstone lenses which have a combined thickness of 30 to 100 feet. The cross-laminated sandstone appears to have been deposited in a flood-plain environment. Scour and fill bedding consisting of cross-bedded sandstone lenses truncated by and direct contact with other truncated lenses separated by thin discontinuous mudstone lenses or mudstone conglomerate. Fragments of fossil wood are abundant in the scour and fill beds and occur either along the bedding planes or in pot like masses called “trash pockets”.

Exploration

A radon survey was completed on the Uravan Mineral Claims during September, 2009. The theory of radon soil surveys is based on the element radon which is a radioactive daughter product of uranium decay. Radon is produced by the radioactive decay of radium, a product of uranium and thorium decay in rocks and soils. Theoretically, radon-222 concentrations in soil should be directly related to the uranium content of the minerals in the soil and rocks. Radon is a daughter product of uranium-238 and a non-reactive, highly mobile gas that migrates away from the site of its uranium parent by diffusion and advection along joints, faults, and intergranular permeable pathways.

The magnitude of a radon anomaly associated with a parent concentration of uranium will be due to the size and grade of the parent body. Dispersion and dilution along the pathways to the surface increase the size of the radon footprint but also reduce the magnitude. The location of the anomaly relative to the uranium body will be strongly influenced by the orientation of the pathways to the surface.

The radon survey uses a system that measures the radon by utilizing an ion chamber with a electrically charged Teflon, called an electret, located inside an electrically conducting plastic chamber of known air volume. The electrets serve as a source of high voltage needed for the chamber to operate as an ion chamber. It also serves as a sensor for the measurement of ionization in air. The ions produced inside the sensitive volume of the chamber are collected by the electrets causing a depletion of charge. The measurement of the depleted charge during the exposure period is a measure of integrated ionization during the measurement period. The electrets charge is read before and after the exposure using a specially built non-contact electret voltage reader.

The Uravan mineral claims radon survey consisted of 101 readings with a minimum reading of 0.35 and a maximum reading of 27.75. The median reading was 6.75 with a midrange of 14.05. The grid results were then contoured and presented in the attached report. Proposed drill locations have also been located and presented on the following map.

The preliminary radon survey data indicates an anomalous east-west radiometric trend. The size of the anomalies appears to be similar to the size of the high grade vanadium-uranium beds mined from the Firefly, Gray Daun and Vanadium Queen Mine. A detailed radon survey would define drill targets and thereby, delineate tonnage and grade within the Uravan Claim Block.

Data compiled from mining activity and regional studies indicates ground considered favorable for Vanadium-Uranium mineralization has the following features:

•	Sandstone beds over 30 feet in thickness with a light brown to light gray color with a medium to fine grain size.

•	The sandstone contains carbonaceous material and a gray or grayish-green mudstone.

•	The beds contain mudstone as a film, pebbles or seams.

•	The sandstone is overlain by gray, greenish-gray or green mudstone

The next steps for exploration, together with estimated costs, are as follows:

The Vanadium-Uranium Channel in the La Sal area has produced ore from the uppermost sandstone unit of the Salt Wash Member of the Morrison Formation. The deposits occur in lenticular channel type sandstone beds that are over 30 feet in thickness. Therefore, it is recommended that a detailed geological mapping program over the Uravan claim block be completed with emphasis on the delineation of sandstone beds that have a light brown, white, or light gray color with a thickness over 30 feet. Special attention should be given to areas that have a green or gray mudstone overlying the sandstone beds.

o	Projected Costs $25,000.00

Based on the preliminary radon survey data, recommendations are made to complete a detail radon survey with 50 meter line spacing and 50 meter station intervals. This would define areas of anomalous radon readings and combined with the geological mapping program would create drill targets to define the continuation of the Vanadium Queen-Firefly vanadium/uranium channel.

o	Projected Costs $75,000.00

·	Historical data and preliminary radon survey data indicate a 10,000 ft drill program would be required to define the grade and tonnage of the Vanadium Queen-Firefly channel that is projected to extend under the Uravan Mineral Claims. The estimated costs for the drill program are:

o	Rehab of Access and Drill Roads $10,000.00

o	Rotary Drilling (10,000 ft @ $15.00/ft) $150,000.00

o	Radiometric Logging of Drill Holes (10,000 ft @ $1.50/ft) $15,000.00

o	Chemical analysis of Drill Samples $20,000.00

o	Geological Supervision and Report Compilation $25,000.00

o	Total: $220,000

The Company is required to undertake a total of a further $990,000 worth of work on the Van-Ur Property. The next steps for exploration, over the next year, are expected to be at least the first two above noted programs, costing approximately $100,000, to be undertaken and/or managed by GeoXplor Corp. If the results are positive for these first two phases, we would expect to proceed to drilling, the costs of which are estimated at $220,000, which is within our work program requirements.

ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

We know of no material, active or pending legal proceedings against our Company, nor of any proceedings that a governmental authority is contemplating against us.

ITEM 4. [REMOVED AND RESERVED]

PART II

ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

Market Price of and Dividends on the Registrant’s Common Equity and Related Stockholder Matters

Market Information

Our Common Stock is traded on the over-the-counter market and quoted on the OTCBB under the symbol “FLPC”

The table below sets forth the range of high and low bid information for our Common Shares as quoted on the OTCBB for each of the quarters during the fiscal year ended July 31, 2010 (no quotes are available for the previous fiscal year as our stock had not traded):

For the Quarter ended	High	Low
October 31, 2009 (partial)	$0.10	$0.10
January 31, 2010	$0.10	$0.10
April 30, 2010	$1.05	$0.15
July 31, 2010	$1.02	$0.30

The quotations provided may reflect inter-dealer prices, without retail mark-up, mark-down or commission and may not represent actual transactions.

Holders of our Common Stock

On November 11, 2011 the shareholders’ list of our common stock showed 9 registered shareholders and 76,210,790 shares outstanding.

Dividend Policy

We have not paid any cash dividends on our common stock and have no present intention of paying any dividends on the shares of our common stock. Our future dividend policy will be determined from time to time by our Board of Directors.

Securities Authorized for Issuance under Equity Compensation Plans

As of July 31, 2010, we had not adopted an equity compensation plan and had not granted any stock options.

Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities

The 720,000 shares were in compliance with the exemption from the registration requirements found in Regulation S promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) under the Securities Act of 1933. The offer and sale to the purchaser was made in an offshore transaction as defined by Rule 902(h). No directed selling efforts were made in the U.S. as defined in Rule 902(c). The offer and sale to the purchaser was not made to a U.S. person or for the account or benefit of a U.S. person. The following conditions were present in the offer and sale: a) The purchaser of the securities certified that it is not a U.S. person and did not acquire the shares for the account or benefit of any U.S. person; b) The purchaser has agreed to resell the securities only in compliance with Regulation S pursuant to a registration under the Securities Act, or pursuant to an applicable exemption from registration; and has agreed not to engage in hedging transactions with regard to the securities unless in compliance with the Securities Act; c) The purchaser has acknowledged and agreed

with the Company that the Company shall refuse registration of any transfer of the securities unless made in accordance with Regulation S, pursuant to a registration statement under the Securities Act, or pursuant to an applicable exemption from registration and; d) The purchaser has represented that it is acquiring the shares for its own account, for investment purposes only and not with a view to any resale, distribution or other disposition of the shares in violation of the United States federal securities laws. Neither the Company nor any person acting on its behalf offered or sold these securities by any form of general solicitation or general advertising. The shares sold are restricted securities and the certificates representing these shares have been affixed with a standard restrictive legend, which states that the securities cannot be sold without registration under the Securities Act of 1933 or an exemption therefrom. No commissions or finder’s fees were paid by the Company in connection with the issuance of these shares.

On March 1, 2010, the Company entered into a consulting agreement with Mr. John Rud, wherein Mr. Rud has agreed to provide, among other things, consulting services to the Company for a period of 12 months. The Company agreed to issue to Mr. Rud 250,000 shares of the Company common stock for services to be provided. Compensation expense is calculated by dividing the number of days for which services were provided by 365, multiplying by the number of shares issuable under the contract (250,000), then multiplying by the average closing share price for the entire duration of the calculation. Prior periods expensed are deducted from a current period calculation to determine current period expenses. As of July 31, 2010, these shares of common stock have not been issued, but have been issued subsequent to the fiscal year end.

On May 3 2010, we entered into a consulting agreement with Mr. John Hoak, wherein Mr. Hoak has agreed to provide, among other things, consulting services to the Company. The agreement was effective March 24, 2010 and continues to March 24, 2012. In consideration for agreeing to provide such consulting services, we have issued to Mr. Hoak 250,000 shares of our common stock valued at $187,500.

The Company claims an exemption from the registration requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, for the issuance of shares to Mr. Hoak pursuant to Section 4(2) of the Act and/or Rule 506 of Regulation D promulgated thereunder since, among other things, the transaction does not involve a public offering, the purchasers are “accredited investors” and/or qualified institutional buyers, the purchasers have access to information about the Company and its purchase, the purchasers will take the securities for investment and not resale, and the Company is taking appropriate measures to restrict the transfer of the securities.

Purchases of Equity Securities by the Issuer and Affiliated Purchases

During each month within the fourth quarter of the fiscal year ended July 31, 2010, neither we nor any “affiliated purchaser,” as that term is defined in Rule 10b-18(a)(3) under the Exchange Act, repurchased any of our common stock or other securities.

ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA.

As a “smaller reporting company”, we are not required to provide the information required by this Item.

ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATION

The following discussion should be read in conjunction with our audited financial statements and the related notes that appear elsewhere in this Annual Report. The following discussion contains forward-looking statements that reflect our plans, estimates and beliefs. Our actual results could differ materially from those discussed in the forward looking statements. Factors that could cause or contribute to such differences include those discussed below and elsewhere in this Annual Report.

Our financial statements are stated in United States dollars and are prepared in accordance with United States generally accepted accounting principles.

Our Current Business

We are an exploration stage company engaged in the exploration of mineral properties.

Liquidity & Capital Resources

As an exploration stage Company, we have had no revenues for the period from inception (May 28, 2007), through July 31, 2010. We expect to incur substantial costs while we continue to undertake exploration work on our properties, in addition to meeting our ongoing corporate obligations and debt servicing. As of July 31, 2010, we have $179,791 ($138 – 2009) in cash, which is insufficient to meet our current liabilities which total $376,003 at July 31, 2010 ($9,205 – 2009), nor does it meet our anticipated additional operating and property related costs noted below.

Accordingly, we will require additional funds to implement our exploration and development programs, and to meet our other pending obligations. These funds may be raised through equity financing, debt financing, or other sources, which may result in further dilution in the equity ownership of our shares. There is still no assurance that we will be able to maintain operations at a level sufficient for an investor to obtain a return on his investment in our common stock. Further, we may continue to be unprofitable in the forthcoming fiscal year and beyond. We need to raise additional funds in the near future in order to proceed with our exploration program.

In fiscal year 2010/2011 we anticipate that based on meeting our known obligations for general operations and for maintaining our two agreements current, we will be required to expend the following cash amounts:

	Amount
General operating costs	$	25,000
Professional Fees		50,000
Consulting Fees		60,000
Property Acquisition Costs - Lida Valley		75,000
Property Acquisition Costs - Uravan		100,000
Exploration / Maintenance Costs – Lida Valley (1)		15,000
Exploration / Maintenance Costs – Uravan (2)		90,500
$200,000 and $50,000 Promissory notes due December 31, 2010 and March 15, 2011, respectively, plus 10% interest.		280,000
Total	$	695,500

(1)

The Company was required to expend $100,000 in exploration work on the Property prior to December 15, 2010, of which approximately $85,000 has been completed as at July 31, 2010. Note that a further $150,000 is required to be expended prior to December 15, 2011, $350,000 prior to December 15, 2012, and $400,000 prior to December 15, 2013.

(2)

The Company was required to expend $100,000 in exploration work on the Property prior to December 15, 2010, of which approximately $9,500 has been completed as at July 31, 2010. Note that a further $150,000 is required to be expended prior to December 15, 20111, $350,000 prior to December 15, 2012, and $400,000 prior to December 15, 2013.

If we are to acquire additional properties, or undertake additional operational activities, we would be required to raise additional capital. There can be no assurance that we will be successful in raising the capital required to fund our planned expenditures or other additional activities.

Results of Operations

Our revenues since inception (March 28, 2007) to date have been $nil. For the fiscal year ended July 31, 2010, our loss from operations increased substantially to $383,203, from $20,196 in the prior year.

This increase was due almost entirely to the acquisition and development of the Company’s two mineral properties in the current fiscal year, and the associated legal, accounting and administration costs associated with the acquisition, and additional administration costs which ensued from bringing on additional consultants to manage the Company’s operations. In particular, as a result of the above, exploration costs were $106,691 ($nil – 2009), consulting fees were $206,058 ($nil – 2009), accounting and audit fees were $16,900 ($9,500 – 2009), and legal fees were $20,014 ($3,024 – 2009).

We have suffered recurring losses from operations. The continuation of our Company is dependent upon our Company attaining and maintaining profitable operations and raising additional capital as needed. In this regard, we have successfully raised additional capital through equity offerings and loan transactions in the past, and presently believe we will be able to do so in the future, though we can offer no assurance of this outcome as no specific arrangements are in place.

Going Concern

In their audit report relating to our financial statements for the period ended July 31, 2010 and 2009, our independent accountants indicated that there are a number of factors that raise substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern. Such factors identified in the report are our lack of revenue resulting in a net loss position and insufficient funds to meet our business objectives. All of these factors continue to exist and raise doubt about our status as a going concern.

We anticipate that additional funding will be required in the form of equity financing from the sale of our common stock. At this time, we cannot provide investors with any assurance that we will be able to raise sufficient funding from the sale of our common stock or through a loan from our directors to meet our obligations over the next twelve months. We do not have any arrangements in place for any future debt or equity financing.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

The preparation of our financial statements requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. On an on-going basis, management evaluates its estimates and judgments which are based on historical experience and on various other factors that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. The results of their evaluation form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions and circumstances. Our significant accounting policies are more fully discussed in the Notes to our Financial Statements.

ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

As a “smaller reporting company”, we are not required to provide the information required by this Item.

ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA.

FIRST LIBERTY POWER CORP.

(FORMERLY QUUIBUS TECHNOLOGY, INC.)

(AN EXLORATION STAGE COMPANY)

INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

	Page
Index to Financial Statements July 31, 2010 and 2009	F-1
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm	F-2
Balance Sheets as of July 31, 2010, and 2009	F-3
Statements of Operations for the Years Ended July 31, 2010, and 2009, and Cumulative from Inception (March 28, 2007) through July 31, 2010	F-4
Statement of Stockholders’ Equity (Deficit) for the Period from Inception (March 28, 2007) through July 31, 2010	F-5
Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended July 31, 2010, and 2009, and Cumulative from Inception (March 28, 2007) through July 31, 2010	F-6
Notes to Financial Statements July 31, 2010, and 2009	F-7 to F-14

F-1

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Directors and Stockholders

First Liberty Power Corp.

We have audited the accompanying balance sheet of First Liberty Power Corp. (An Exploration Stage Company) as of July 31, 2010 and the related statements of operations, stockholders’ equity (deficit) and cash flows for the year ended July 31, 2010. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit. We did not audit the financial statements of First Liberty Power Corp. for the year ended July 31, 2009 and from inception (March 28, 2007) to July 31, 2009. Those statements were audited by other auditors.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. The company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audit included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of First Liberty Power Corp. (An Exploration Stage Company) as of July 31, 2010 and the results of its operations and cash flows for the year ended July 31, 2010 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

The accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming the Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 2 to the financial statements, the Company has suffered losses from operations, which raise substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern. Management’s plans in regard to these matters are also described in Note 2. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

/s/ De Joya Griffith & Company, LLC

Henderson, Nevada

June 13, 2011

F-2

FIRST LIBERTY POWER CORP.

(FORMERLY QUUIBUS TECHNOLOGY, INC.)

(AN EXPLORATION STAGE COMPANY)

BALANCE SHEETS

AS OF JULY 31, 2010 AND 2009

	July 31, 2010			July 31, 2009
ASSETS
CURRENT ASSETS:
Cash in bank	$	179,791		$	138
Prepaid consulting fees		121,415			-
Total current assets		301,206			138

PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT:
Deposit on mineral properties		195,000			-
Total property and equipment		195,000			-

TOTAL ASSETS	$	496,206		$	138

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIT)

CURRENT LIABILITIES:
Accounts payable – trade	$	33,572		$	4,705
Accounts payable – related parties		57,168			-
Accrued liabilities		25,502			3,500
Due to stockholder		9,761			1,000
Loan payable		250,000			-

Total current liabilities		376,003			9,205

Total liabilities		376,003			9,205

Commitments and Contingencies

STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIT)
Common stock, par value $0.001 per share; 540,000,000 shares authorized; 68,425,000 and 68,175,000 shares issued and outstanding in 2010, and 2009, respectively		68,425			68,175
Additional paid in capital		195,500			8,250
Common stock payable		324,973			-
Deficit accumulated during the exploration stage		(468,695	)		(85,492	)
Total stockholders' equity (deficit)		120,203			(9,067	)

TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIT)	$	496,206		$	138

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

F-3

FIRST LIBERTY POWER CORP.

(FORMERLY QUUIBUS TECHNOLOGY, INC.)

(AN EXPLORATION STAGE COMPANY)

STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

							Cumulative from
	July 31,						Inception (March 28, 2007)
	2010			2009			to July 31, 2010

REVENUES	$	-		$	-		$	-

EXPENSES:
Exploration costs		106,691			-			106,691
General and administrative-
Accounting and audit fees		16,900			9,500			34,400
Legal fees – other		20,014			3,024			38,205
Transfer agent fees		1,311			1,450			15,280
SEC filing fees		620			4,622			9,395
Consulting fees		206,058			-			206,058
Office rent		1,440			1,441			4,321
Legal fees – Incorporation fees		-			-			475
Bank and currency exchange fees (gains)		(4,477	)		159			(4,064	)
Office supplies and miscellaneous		20,268			-			20,356
Total general and administrative expenses		368,825			20,196			431,117

LOSS FROM OPERATIONS		(368,825	)		(20,196	)		(431,117	)

OTHER EXPENSE:
Interest expense		(14,378	)		-			(14,378	)

NET LOSS	$	(383,203	)	$	(20,196	)	$	(445,495	)

LOSS PER COMMON SHARE:
Loss per common share – basic	$	(0.01	)	$	(0.00	)

WEIGHTED AVERAGE NUMBER OF COMMON SHARES OUTSTANDING-BASIC		68,229,795			68,175,000

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

F-4

FIRST LIBERTY POWER CORP.

(FORMERLY QUUIBUS TECHNOLOGY, INC.)

(AN EXPLORATION STAGE COMPANY)

STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIT)

FOR THE PERIOD FROM INCEPTION (MARCH 28, 2007)

THROUGH JULY 31, 2010

										Deficit
										Accumulated
					Additional					During the
	Common Stock				Paid-in			Stock		Exploration
	Shares		Amount		Capital			Payable		Stage			Totals

Balance – March 28, 2007		-	$	-	$	-		$	-	$	-		$	-
Common stock issued for cash		43,200,000		43,200		-			-		(23,200	)		20,000
Net loss for the period		-		-		-			-		(520	)		(520	)
Balance - July 31, 2007		43,200,000		43,200		-			-		(23,720	)		19,480
Common stock issued for cash		24,975,000		24,975		21,525			-		-			46,500
Deferred offering costs		-		-		(13,750	)		-		-			(13,750	)
Forgiveness of related party debt		-		-		475			-		-			475
Net loss for the period		-		-		-			-		(41,576	)		(41,576	)
Balance July 31, 2008		68,175,000		68,175		8,250			-		(65,296	)		11,129
Net loss for the period		-		-		-			-		(20,196	)		(20,196	)
Balance July 31, 2009		68,175,000		68,175		8,250			-		(85,492	)		(9,067	)
Common stock subscribed for cash- 720,000 shares		-		-		-			260,000		-			260,000
Common stock to be issued for services		-		-		-			64,973		-			64,973
Common stock issued for services		250,000		250		187,250			-		-			187,500
Net loss for the period		-		-		-			-		(383,203	)		(383,203	)
Balance July 31, 2010		68,425,000	$	68,425	$	195,500		$	324,973	$	(468,695	)	$	120,203

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

F-5

FIRST LIBERTY POWER CORP.

(FORMERLY QUUIBUS TECHNOLOGY, INC.)

(AN EXPLORATION STAGE COMPANY)

STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

							Cumulative
							From Inception
	July 31,						(March 28, 2007)
	2010			2009			To July 31, 2010
OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net loss	$	(383,203	)	$	(20,196	)	$	(445,495	)
Adjustments to reconcile net (loss) to net cash (used in) operating activities:
Debt forgiven		-			-			475
Stock subscribed and issued for consulting services		131,241			-			131,241
Changes in net assets and liabilities -
Accrued interest		14,378			-			14,378
Prepaid		(183	)		-			(183	)
Accounts payable - Trade		28,867			4,505			33,572
Accrued liabilities		7,624			(120	)		11,124
Accounts payable – related parties		57,168			-			57,168
NET CASH USED IN OPERATING ACTIVITIES		(144,108	)		(15,811	)		(197,720	)

INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Deposit on mineral properties		(195,000	)		-			(195,000	)
NET CASH USED IN INVESTING ACTIVITIES		(195,000	)		-			(195,000	)

FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Proceeds from unit subscriptions		260,000			-			260,000
Proceeds from the issuance of common stock		-			-			66,500
Proceeds from former shareholder loan		8,761			1,000			9,761
Proceeds from loan		250,000			-			250,000
Deferred offering costs		-			-			(13,750	)
NET CASH PROVIDED BY FINANCING ACTIVITIES		518,761			1,000			572,511

NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH		179,653			(14,811	)		179,791

CASH – BEGINNING OF PERIOD		138			14,949			-
CASH – END OF PERIOD	$	179,791		$	138		$	179,791

SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION AND NON-CASH ACTIVITIES
Cash paid during the period for:
Interest	$	-		$	-		$	-
Income taxes	$	-		$	-		$	-
Change in prepaid	$	121,232		$	-		$	121,232

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

F-6

FIRST LIBERTY POWER CORP.

(FORMERLY QUUIBUS TECHNOLOGY, INC.)

(AN EXPLORATION STAGE COMPANY)

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

JULY 31, 2010 AND 2009

(1) Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Basis of Presentation and Organization

First Liberty Power Corp. (“First Liberty Power” or the “Company” and formerly Quuibus Technology, Inc.) is a Nevada corporation in the exploration stage. The Company was incorporated under the laws of the State of Nevada on March 28, 2007. The original business plan of the Company was focused on developing and offering a server-based software product for the creation of wireless communities. In December 2009, the Company changed its business direction. The Company’s primary focus is on exploration of domestic strategic energy and mineral properties to supply the emerging demand for clean energy. The accompanying financial statements of the Company were prepared from the accounts of the Company under the accrual basis of accounting.

In addition, the Company commenced a capital formation activity to effect a Registration Statement on Form SB-2 with the Securities and Exchange Commission, and raise capital of up to $60,000 from a self-underwritten offering of 1,200,000 shares of newly issued common stock in the public markets. The Registration Statement on Form SB-2 was filed with the SEC on November 13, 2007, and declared effective on November 21, 2007. On February 18, 2008, the Company completed an offering of its registered common stock as explained in Note 4.

On December 22, 2009, the Company declared a 1 for 27 forward stock split of its issued and outstanding common stock. The Company authorized common stock increased from 20,000,000 shares of common stock with a par value of $0.001 to 540,000,000 shares of common stock with a par value of $0.001, and correspondingly, the Company’s issued and outstanding shares of common stock increased from 2,525,000 shares of common stock to 68,175,000 shares of common stock. All references in the financial statements and notes to financial statements to number of shares price per share, and weighted average number of shares outstanding prior to the stock split on a retroactive basis.

Effective December 22, 2009, the Company changed its name from “Quuibus Technology, Inc.” to “First Liberty Power Corp.” by way of a merger with its wholly owned subsidiary First Liberty Power Corp., which was formed solely for the change of name.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

For purposes of reporting within the statements of cash flows, the Company considers all cash on hand, cash accounts not subject to withdrawal restrictions or penalties, and all highly liquid debt instruments purchased with a maturity of three months or less to be cash and cash equivalents.

Mineral Properties

The Company is primarily engaged in the business of the acquisition, exploration, development, mining, and production of domestic strategic energy and mineral properties, with emphasis on lithium, vanadium, and uranium. Mineral claim and other property acquisition costs are capitalized as incurred. Such costs are carried as an asset of the Company until it becomes apparent through exploration activities that the cost of such properties will not be realized through mining operations. Mineral exploration costs are expensed as incurred, and when it becomes apparent that a mineral property can be economically developed as a result of establishing proven or probable reserve, the exploration costs, along with mine development cost, are capitalized. The costs of acquiring mineral claims, capitalized exploration costs, and mine development costs are recognized for depletion and amortization purposes under the units-of-production method over the estimated life of the probable and proven reserves. If mineral properties, exploration, or mine development activities are subsequently abandoned or impaired, any capitalized costs are charged to operations in the current period.

F-7

FIRST LIBERTY POWER CORP.

(FORMERLY QUUIBUS TECHNOLOGY, INC.)

(AN EXPLORATION STAGE COMPANY)

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

JULY 31, 2010 AND 2009

(1) Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (continued)

Revenue Recognition

The Company is in the exploration stage and has yet to realize revenues from operations. Once the Company has commenced operations, it will recognize revenues when delivery of goods or completion of services has occurred provided there is persuasive evidence of an agreement, acceptance has been approved by its customers, the fee is fixed or determinable based on the completion of stated terms and conditions, and collection of any related receivable is probable.

Long-lived assets

The Company accounts for its long-lived assets in accordance with FASB ASC 360-10, “Property, Plant and Equipment” which requires that long-lived assets be reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the historical cost carrying value of an asset may no longer be appropriate. The Company assesses recoverability of the carrying value of an asset by estimating the future net cash flows expected to result from the asset, including eventual disposition. If the future net cash flows are less than the carrying value of the asset, an impairment loss is recorded equal to the difference between the asset’s carrying value and fair value or disposal value.

Loss per Common Share

Basic loss per share is computed by dividing the net loss attributable to the common stockholders by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the period. Diluted loss per share is computed similar to basic loss per share except that the denominator is increased to include the number of additional common shares that would have been outstanding if the potential common shares had been issued and if the additional common shares were dilutive. There were no dilutive financial instruments issued or outstanding during the years ended July 31, 2010, and 2009.

Income Taxes

The Company accounts for income taxes pursuant to FASB ASC Topic 740, Income Taxes. Under FASB ASC Topic 740, deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on temporary differences between the bases of certain assets and liabilities for income tax and financial reporting purposes. The deferred tax assets and liabilities are classified according to the financial statement classification of the assets and liabilities generating the differences.

The Company maintains a valuation allowance with respect to deferred tax assets. The Company establishes a valuation allowance based upon the potential likelihood of realizing the deferred tax asset and taking into consideration the Company’s financial position and results of operations for the current period. Future realization of the deferred tax benefit depends on the existence of sufficient taxable income within the carry-forward period under the Federal tax laws.

Changes in circumstances, such as the Company generating taxable income, could cause a change in judgment about the realizability of the related deferred tax asset. Any change in the valuation allowance will be included in income in the year of the change in estimate.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The Company estimates the fair value of financial instruments using the available market information and valuation methods. Considerable judgment is required in estimating fair value. Accordingly, the estimates of fair value may not be indicative of the amounts the Company could realize in a current market exchange. As of July 31, 2010, and 2009, the carrying value of the Company’s financial instruments approximated fair value due to the short-term nature and maturity of these instruments.

F-8

FIRST LIBERTY POWER CORP.

(FORMERLY QUUIBUS TECHNOLOGY, INC.)

(AN EXPLORATION STAGE COMPANY)

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

JULY 31, 2010 AND 2009

(1) Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (continued)

Common Stock Registration Expenses

The Company considers incremental costs and expenses related to the registration of equity securities with the SEC, whether by contractual arrangement as of a certain date or by demand, to be unrelated to original issuance transactions. As such, subsequent registration costs and expenses are reflected in the accompanying financial statements as general and administrative expenses, and are expensed as incurred.

Estimates

The financial statements are prepared on the basis of accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities as of July 31, 2010, and 2009, and expenses for the years ended July 31, 2010, and 2009, and cumulative from inception. Actual results could differ from those estimates made by management.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In January 2010, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) 2010-6, “Improving Disclosures about Fair Value Measurements.” This update requires additional disclosure within the roll forward of activity for assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis, including transfers of assets and liabilities between Level 1 and Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy and the separate presentation of purchases, sales, issuances and settlements of assets and liabilities within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy. In addition, the update requires enhanced disclosures

In February 2010, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update 2010-09 (ASU 2010-09), Subsequent Events (Topic 855), amending guidance on subsequent events to alleviate potential conflicts between FASB guidance and SEC requirements. Under this amended guidance, SEC filers are no longer required to disclose the date through which subsequent events have been evaluated in originally issued and revised financial statements. This guidance was effective immediately and we adopted these new requirements for the period ended May 31, 2010. The adoption of this guidance did not have a material impact on our financial statements.

(2) Exploration Stage Activities and Going Concern

The Company is currently in the exploration stage as defined by ASC 915, and has engaged in limited operations. Initial operations through July 31, 2010, include capital formation activities, organization, target market identification, and marketing plans. The original business plan of the Company was focused on developing and offering a server-based software product for the creation of wireless communities. In December 2009, the Company changed its business direction to the exploration and development of domestic strategic energy and mineral properties. The Company’s goal is to seek mineral resources to capitalize on the anticipated explosive demand for sustainable clean power.

During the period from inception (March 28, 2007) through July 31, 2010, the Company was incorporated and issued 43,200,000 shares to its Directors for cash proceeds of $20,000. In addition, the Company commenced a capital formation activity to effect a Registration Statement on Form SB-2 with the SEC, and raise capital of up to $60,000 from a self-underwritten offering of 32,400,000 shares of newly issued common stock in the public markets. The Registration Statement on Form SB-2 was filed with the SEC on November 13, 2007, and declared effective on November 21, 2007. On February 18, 2008, the Company completed an offering of its registered common stock as explained in Note 4. The Company also intends to conduct additional capital formation activities through the issuance of its common stock and to further conduct its operations

F-9

FIRST LIBERTY POWER CORP.

(FORMERLY QUUIBUS TECHNOLOGY, INC.)

(AN EXPLORATION STAGE COMPANY)

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

JULY 31, 2010 AND 2009

(2) Exploration Stage Activities and Going Concern (continued)

While management of the Company believes that the Company will be successful in its planned operating activities, there can be no assurance that it will be successful in the development of its product, sale of its planned product, and services that will generate sufficient revenues to sustain its operations.

The accompanying financial statements have been prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, which contemplate continuation of the Company as a going concern. The Company has incurred an operating loss of $445,495 since inception and has no revenues to offset its operating costs. These and other factors raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. The accompanying financial statements do not include any adjustments to reflect the possible future effects on the recoverability and classification of assets or the amounts and classification of liabilities that may result from the possible inability of the Company to continue as a going concern.

(3) Change in Management

On November 26, 2009, Mr. Yavuz Konur resigned as Chief Technical Officer and a Director of the Company.

On November 26, 2009, Mr. Hossein Mohseni resigned as the President, Secretary, Treasurer, and a Director of the Company.

On November 26, 2009, the Company appointed Mr. Glyn R. Garner as the President, Secretary, Treasurer, and a Director of the Company.

On March 1, 2010, the Company appointed Mr. John Rud as Vice President of Exploration of the Company.

On May 13, 2010, the Company appointed Mr. John Hoak as a Director of the Company.

(4) Common Stock

The Company is authorized to issue 540,000,000 shares of $0.001 par value common stock. All common stock shares have equal voting rights, are non-assessable, and have one vote per share. Voting rights are not cumulative and, therefore, the holders of more than 50% of the common stock could, if they choose to do so, elect all of the Directors of the Company.

On July 6, 2007, the Company issued 43,200,000 shares of common stock to its Directors at a price of $0.00046 per share for cash proceeds of $20,000.

In addition, in 2007, the Company commenced a capital formation activity to effect a Registration Statement on Form SB-2 with the SEC, and raise capital of up to $60,000 from a self-underwritten offering of 32,400,000 shares (post forward stock split) of newly issued common stock at a price of $0.0019 per share in the public markets. The Registration Statement on Form SB-2 was filed with the SEC on November 13, 2007, and declared effective on November 21, 2007. On February 18, 2008, the Company completed the self-underwritten offering of 24,975,000 shares of its registered common stock, par value of $0.001 per share, at an offering price of $0.0019 per share for proceeds of $46,500.

F-10

FIRST LIBERTY POWER CORP.

(FORMERLY QUUIBUS TECHNOLOGY, INC.)

(AN EXPLORATION STAGE COMPANY)

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

JULY 31, 2010 AND 2009

(4) Common Stock (continued)

On December 24, 2009, the Company agreed to issue 500,000 shares of common stock to GeoXplor Corp. pursuant to the Mineral Property Purchase Agreement (See Note 8 for additional information). As of July 31, 2010, these shares have not been issued.

On March 1, 2010, the Company entered into a consulting agreement with Mr. John Rud, wherein Mr. Rud has agreed to provide, among other things, consulting services to the Company for a period of 12 months. The Company agreed to issue to Mr. Rud 250,000 shares of the Company common stock for services to be provided. Compensation expense is calculated by dividing the number of days for which services were provided by 365, multiplying by the number of shares issuable under the contract (250,000), then multiplying by the average closing share price for the entire duration of the calculation. Prior periods expensed are deducted from a current period calculation to determine current period expenses. As of July 31, 2010, 104,795 shares valued at $64,973 had been earned and have yet to be issued.

On March 11, 2010, the Company subscribed 720,000 units in a private placement at $0.50 per unit. Each unit consisted of one common share and one detachable non-transferrable warrant. Each whole common share purchase warrant entitles the holder to purchase one share of common stock at a price of $0.50 for a period of twenty-four months commencing from closing. As of January 31, 2011, the subscribed stock had not been issued and has been valued at $0.50 per share. As of January 31, 2011, the shares had not been issued.

On May 3, 2010, we entered into a consulting agreement with Mr. John Hoak, wherein Mr. Hoak has agreed to provide, among other things, consulting services to the Company. The agreement was effective March 24, 2010 and continues to March 24, 2012. In consideration for agreeing to provide such consulting services, we have issued to Mr. Hoak 250,000 shares of our common stock valued at $187,500. During each period, a compensation expense is determined based on the number of days for which services were provided relative to 365 days, multiplied by the common stock valuation. This amount is deducted from the pre-paid expense (initially $187,500 on inception) accordingly each period. A further 250,000 shares will become due in March 24, 2011 should Mr. Hoak remain as a director at that time.

(5) Income Taxes

As of July 31, 2010, the Company had net operating loss carry forwards of $445,495 that may be available to reduce future years’ taxable income through 2029. Future tax benefits which may arise as a result of these losses have not been recognized in these financial statements, as their realization is determined not likely to occur and accordingly, the Company has recorded a valuation allowance for the deferred tax asset relating to these tax loss carryforwards.

	Year Ended July 31,
	2010			2009
Deferred Tax Provision:
Net operating loss carryforward	$	445,495		$	62,292

Federal-
Total deferred tax assets	$	155,923		$	7,000
Less: Valuation allowance		(155,923	)		(7,000	)
Net deferred tax assets	$	-		$	-

The valuation allowance for deferred tax assets as of July 31, 2010 was $155,923. In assessing the recovery of the deferred tax assets, management considers whether it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. The ultimate realization of deferred tax assets is dependent upon the generation of future taxable income in the periods in which those temporary differences become deductible. Management considers the scheduled reversals of future deferred tax assets, projected future taxable income, and tax planning strategies in making this assessment. As a result, management determined it was more likely than not the deferred tax assets would not be realized as of July 31, 2010.

F-11

FIRST LIBERTY POWER CORP.

(FORMERLY QUUIBUS TECHNOLOGY, INC.)

(AN EXPLORATION STAGE COMPANY)

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

JULY 31, 2010 AND 2009

(6) Related Party Transactions

During the year ended July 31, 2008, an officer, Director, and stockholder of the Company personally paid for expenses on behalf of the Company in the amount of $475. As of July 31, 2008, this individual forgave the Company of this debt.

On December 4, 2009, Mr. Glynn Garner was appointed President, Secretary, Treasurer, and a member of the board of directors of the Company. Mr. Garner did not enter into any formal employment or consulting agreement at the time. Subsequent to the end of the fiscal year ending July 31, 2010, the Company agreed to compensate Mr. Garner in the amount of $5,000 per month, commencing January 2010, for services provided in the capacity of President, Secretary and Treasurer, which amount was invoiced in a subsequent period. Accordingly, $35,000 was accrued in consulting fees through to July 31, 2010. A further $12,169 in expenses was incurred, resulting in a total $47,169 due and payable to the related party. Mr. Garner resigned all of his officer and director positions on December 28, 2010.

On March 1, 2010, the Company entered into a consulting agreement with Mr. John Rud, who holds the position of Vice President Exploration with the Company. The Company was to issue 250,000 shares of common stock for services rendered. During the fiscal year ended July 31, 2010, $64,973 of consulting expense was recognized pertaining to the agreement. The 250,000 shares of common stock have not yet been issued. Mr. Rud is also a principal with GeoXplor, with whom the Company has its two property purchase agreements.

$66,268 for the period ending July 31, 2010, leaving a pre-paid expense balance of $121,232. A further 250,000 shares will become due in March 24, 2011 should Mr. Hoak remain as a director at that time. The agreement also contains a provision for the payment of $2,500 a month during the term of the agreement, resulting in the additional amount of $10,000 being accrued through to July 31, 2010.

As of July 31, 2010, an officer, former Director and stockholder of the Company loaned $9,761 (July 31, 2009 - $1,000) to the Company for working capital purposes. The loan is unsecured, non-interest bearing, and has no specific terms for repayment.

(7) Loan Payable

On December 24, 2009, the Company borrowed $200,000 from a third party under a promissory note. The loan is unsecured, bears interest at 10 percent per annum, and is due and payable on or before December 23, 2010. On February 1, 2010, the Company borrowed an additional $50,000. The loan is unsecured, bears interest at 10 percent per annum, and is due on or before January 31, 2011. As of July 31, 2010, $14,378 of interest related to the loans was accrued.

(8) Contracts and Agreements

Mineral Property Purchase Agreement

On December 24, 2009, the Company entered into two property purchase agreements with GeoXplor Corp. (“GeoXplor”), which granted exclusive exploration licenses to the mineral properties described in the agreements.

F-12

FIRST LIBERTY POWER CORP.

(FORMERLY QUUIBUS TECHNOLOGY, INC.)

(AN EXPLORATION STAGE COMPANY)

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

JULY 31, 2010 AND 2009

(8) Contracts and Agreements (continued)

One property purchase agreement is in regards to claims located in Esmeralda County, Nevada, for Lithium and Lithium Carbonate exploration (the “Lithium Agreement”). Under the Lithium Agreement, the Company is required to:

1.	Make cash payments of $490,000 over a four-year period

a.	Initial cash payments of $115,000 were made in November and December of 2009

2.	Issue a total of 1,000,000 restricted shares of common stock over a three-year period

a.	250,000 shares of common stock were issuable upon execution of the agreement (not issued as of July 31, 2010)

3.	Comply with a work commitment of $1,000,000 within four years of the date of the agreement.

a.	As of July 31, 2010, a total of $85,287 has been expended on exploration and claim maintenance activities.

Another property purchase agreement is in regards to claims located in San Juan County, Utah, for Vanadium and Uranium exploration (the “Van-Ur Agreement”). In regards to the Van-Ur Agreement, the Company is required to:

1.	Make cash payments of $480,000 over a four-year period

a.	Initial cash payments of $80,000 were made in November and December of 2009

2.	Issue a total of 1,000,000 restricted shares of common stock over a three-year period

a.	250,000 shares of common stock were issuable upon execution of the agreement (not issued as of July 31, 2010)

3.	Comply with a work commitment of $1,000,000 within four years of the date of the Agreement.

As of January 31, 2010, a total of $9,494 has been expended on exploration and claim maintenance activities.

All outstanding share issuances due and payable under the two agreements are to be issued in the 2nd reporting quarter. There have been no notices of default to date provided to the Company under the agreements in respect to the delivery of shares.

Pursuant to both Agreements, upon the completion of the required payments and work commitments, GeoXplor shall transfer title to the properties to the Company, and will retain a three percent (3%) royalty, on which, the Company will have the option to purchase two percent (2%), each percentage point for $1,000,000. Furthermore, if the Company, an assignee or a joint venture including the Company, (i) delivers to its Board of Directors or applicable other management a feasibility study recommending mining from the respective Properties and such Board of management authorizes implementation of a mining plan, or (ii) sells, options, assigns, disposes or otherwise alienates all or a portion of its interest in the Property, the Company shall pay GeoXplor an additional bonus of Five Hundred Thousand Dollars ($500,000) in cash or Shares of the Company. The election to obtain cash or shares shall be at the sole election of GeoXplor.

(9) Subsequent events

On February 3, 2011 we entered into and closed an agreement with New America Energy Corp. (“New America”) and GeoXplor Inc. (“NECA Agreement”), pertaining to the assignment of the Company’s interest in the mining claims associated with our December 24, 2009, Van-Ur Agreement with GeoXplor, and we granted an option, as well as exploration rights, in these claims. Pursuant to the terms of the NECA Agreement, the consideration for entering into this agreement with New America is as follows:

F-13

FIRST LIBERTY POWER CORP.

(FORMERLY QUUIBUS TECHNOLOGY, INC.)

(AN EXPLORATION STAGE COMPANY)

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

JULY 31, 2010 AND 2009

(9) Subsequent events (continued)

1.	$10,000 on the execution of the agreement; $33,333 within 120 days of the execution of the agreement; $33,333 within 240 days of the execution of the agreement; and $33,334 within 360 days of the execution of the agreement;

a.	The amount of $10,000 was received by the Company on February 8, 2011

2.	500,000 shares of New America common stock

a.	These shares were issued to the Company on February 11, 2011

3.	A 0.5% net smelter royalty on all net revenue derived from production from the Property.

This NECA Agreement fully releases the Company from its obligations under the December 24, 2009, UraVan Agreement, including the December 24, 2010 payment of $100,000 (deferred until February 7, 2011) and all future payments, work program commitments, and stock issuances including the December 24, 2010 issuance for 250,000 shares. The value of the mining property asset associated with this agreement will be divested from the Company’s financial statements.

If New America is unable to make any of the ongoing share issuances or payments under the agreements with GeoXplor and the Company, the property rights would revert to the Company who would be responsible for any remaining payments to GeoXplor which are as follows:

1.	$50,000 on February 28, 2011; $50,000 on May 31, 2011; $100,000 on the 1st year anniversary of the agreement; $100,000 on the 2nd year anniversary of the agreement; $100,000 on the 3rd year anniversary of the agreement; and $100,000 on the 4th year anniversary of the agreement;

2.	250,000 shares of common stock on or before the date one year from the date of the agreement; 250,000 shares of common stock on or before the date two years from the date of the agreement; and 250,000 shares of common stock on or before the date three years from the date of the agreement; and

3.	A 2.5% net smelter royalty on all net revenue derived from production from the Property.

As of the date of this report, New America is current in its payment obligations to the Company and to GeoXplor.

On March 3, 2011 the Company received a letter from Etania Audit Group P.C. (“Etania”) (formerly Davis Accounting Group P.C.) stating that it was resigning as the registered independent auditor of the Company. Subsequently, also on March 3, 2011, the Company received from the Securities and Exchange Commission a letter stating that its auditor, Etania, was not duly licensed when it issued an audit opinion on the Company’s financial statements included in the Company’s Form 10-K for fiscal year ending July 31, 2010, and accordingly those financial statements are not considered to be audited. The Company has filed, on March 22, 2011, an amended Form 10-K report to include audited financial statements by a firm which is duly registered and in good standing.

On March 7, 2011, the Board engaged the accounting firm of De Joya Griffith & Company, LLC (“De Joya”) and appointed it as the Company’s new independent registered public accounting firm.

Subsequent to the fiscal year ending July 31, 2010, all shares and warrants that were not issued as of the fiscal year end, have been issued.

F-14

ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

In the fiscal years ended July 31, 2010 and 2009, there have been no changes in the Company’s accounting policies, nor have there been any disagreements with our accountants.

ITEM 9A(T). CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

Our management, under supervision and with the participation of the Company’s Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer, evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures, as defined under Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(e). Based upon this evaluation, the Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer concluded that, as of July 31, 2010, because of the material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting (“ICFR”) described below, our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective.

Disclosure controls and procedures are controls and other procedures that are designed to ensure that required information to be disclosed in our reports filed or submitted under the Securities Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that required information to be disclosed in our reports filed under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our principal executive officer and our principal financial officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as defined under Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 14d-14(f). Our internal control over financial reporting is designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.

All internal control systems, no matter how well designed, have inherent limitations and may not prevent or detect misstatements. Therefore, even those systems determined to be effective can only provide reasonable assurance with respect to financial reporting reliability and financial statement preparation and presentation. In addition, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to risk that controls become inadequate because of changes in conditions and that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

Management assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of July 31, 2010. In making the assessment, management used the criteria issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) in Internal Control-Integrated Framework. Based on its assessment, management concluded that, as of July 31, 2010, our internal control over financial reporting was not effective and that material weaknesses in ICFR existed as more fully described below.

As defined by Auditing Standard No. 5, “An Audit of Internal Control Over Financial Reporting that is Integrated with an Audit of Financial Statements” established by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (“PCAOB”), a material weakness is a deficiency or combination of deficiencies that results in more than a remote likelihood that a material misstatement of annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected. In connection with the assessment described above, management identified the following control deficiencies that represent material weaknesses as of July 31, 2010:

Lack of an independent audit committee or audit committee financial expert, and no independent directors. We do not have any members of the Board who are independent directors and we do not have an audit committee. These factors may be counter to corporate governance practices as defined by the various stock exchanges and may lead to less supervision over management;

Inadequate staffing and supervision within our bookkeeping operations. We have one consultant involved in bookkeeping functions, who provides one staff member. The relatively small number of people who are responsible for bookkeeping functions and the fact that they are from the same firm of consultants prevents us from segregating duties within our internal control system. The inadequate segregation of duties is a weakness because it could lead to the untimely identification and resolution of accounting and disclosure matters or could lead to a failure to perform timely and effective reviews. This may result in a failure to detect errors in spreadsheets, calculations or assumptions used to compile the financial statements and related disclosures as filed with the SEC;

Outsourcing of our accounting operations. Because there are no employees in our administration, we have outsourced all of our accounting functions to an independent firm. The employees of this firm are managed by supervisors within the firm and are not answerable to the Company’s management. This is a material weakness because it could result in a disjunction between the accounting policies adopted by our Board of Directors and the accounting practices applied by the independent firm;

4)	Insufficient written policies and procedures for accounting and financial reporting with respect to the requirements and application of US GAAP and SEC disclosure requirements;

5)	Ineffective controls over period end financial disclosure and reporting processes.

Management's Remediation Initiatives

As of July 31, 2010, management assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting. Based on that evaluation, it was concluded that during the period covered by this report, the internal controls and procedures were not effective due to deficiencies that existed in the design or operation of our internal controls over financial reporting. However, management believes these weaknesses did not have an effect on our financial results. During the course of their evaluation, we did not discover any fraud involving management or any other personnel who play a significant role in our disclosure controls and procedures or internal controls over financial reporting.

Due to a lack of financial and personnel resources, we are not able to, and do not intend to, immediately take any action to remediate these material weaknesses. We will not be able to do so until, if ever, we acquire sufficient financing and staff to do so. We will implement further controls as circumstances, cash flow, and working capital permits. Notwithstanding the assessment that our ICFR was not effective and that there were material weaknesses as identified in this report, we believe that our financial statements contained in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended July 31, 2010, fairly presents our financial position, results of operations, and cash flows for the periods covered, as identified, in all material respects.

Management believes that the material weaknesses set forth above were the result of the scale of our operations and intrinsic to our small size. Management also believes that these weaknesses did not have an effect on our financial results.

We are committed to improving our financial organization. As part of this commitment, we will, as soon as funds are available to the Company (1) appoint outside directors to our board of directors sufficient to form an audit committee and who will undertake the oversight in the establishment and monitoring of required internal controls and procedures; (2) create a position to segregate duties consistent with control objectives and to increase our personnel resources. We will continue to monitor and evaluate the effectiveness of our internal controls and procedures and our internal controls over financial reporting on an ongoing basis and are committed to taking further action and implementing additional enhancements or improvements, as necessary, and as funds allow.

This Annual Report does not include an attestation report of the Company’s registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting. Management’s report was not subject to attestation by the Company’s registered public accounting firm pursuant to the temporary rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission that permit the Company to provide only management’s report in this annual report.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

During the period covered by this report, there were no changes (including corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies or material weaknesses) in our internal controls over financial reporting that occurred that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION

None.

PART III

ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Executive Officer and Directors

Our officers and Directors and their ages and positions are as follows:

Name	Age	Position	Appointment
Glyn Garner	50	President and Director	Dec 4, 2009
John Rud	71	Vice President Exploration	Mar 1, 2010 – present
John Hoak	59	Director	May 3, 2010 - present

Mr. Glyn Garner, President, Secretary, Treasurer, Director

Mr. Garner owned a successful general contracting company in London, England. Since 1996 to date, Mr. Garner owns and operates Black and White Construction in Antigua, Dominica, St. Marten and St. Kitts where he builds high end homes and developments.

Mr. John Rud, Vice President Exploration

John Rud has amassed over 50 years of experience in identifying, exploring and processing a wide variety of mineral deposits. Mr. Rud holds a Bachelor of Science degree and a Master of Science degree in Geology from the University of Oregon. For the past five years, he has concentrated on uranium properties and production. His lifelong experience in all aspects of putting mining properties in production makes him a unique Company resource.

Formerly employed at AZCO Mica, Inc., where he served as a marketing director, Mr. Rud was responsible for the design and construction of a wet-ground mica plant. Along with hiring all personnel and contractors, he oversaw equipment procurement and supervised all corporate marketing activities.

Mr. Rud is also the former president and director of Gentry Steel Inc., a position that required him to govern day-to-day operations of the public listed company. The corporation is presently completing the mine permitting, the purchasing of land for the processing plant, and procuring the mining and processing equipment for a 30-million pound per year high-grade iron oxide pigment operation. A brief summary of Mr. Rud's recent mine development experience is as follows:

Marketing Director (AZCO Mica, Inc.) Responsible for the design and construction of a wet ground mica plant. Hired all personnel and contractors. Procurement of equipment. Supervised all marketing activities regarding the wet ground mica product. Mill currently in operation and producing a wet ground mica product.

President/Director (Gentry Steel Inc.) Responsible for managing the day-to-day operations of the public company. Company is presently completing the mine permitting, purchasing land for the processing plant, and procuring the mining and processing equipment for a 30 million pound per year high-grade iron oxide pigment operation.

·	President/Geologist (Aimco Consolidated) Supervised geological mapping of the Gentry Iron Ore Deposit. Supervised Core drilling program to delineated ore reserves. Completed a feasibility program to determine the economic merits of the iron ore deposit.

·	Geologist Located and evaluated a porphyry copper deposit in the Picacho Mountain, Pinal County, AZ. Leased property to Cyprus Metals Corporation.

·	Geological Consultant Designed and constructed a 24 TPD portable column flotation plant. The portable plant was equipped with fine ore feeder, grinding circuit, computer controlled flotation column, drying and bagging facilities.

John Hoak, Director

Mr. Hoak has 30 years of diversified experience in construction, oil & gas and minerals development and underground mining and drilling operations. He is a founder, Chief Executive Officer and Executive Director of New Era Petroleum, LLC of Sheridan, Wyoming. He was a founder and Executive Director of Rock Well Petroleum, serving as Chief Operating Officer and then as Chief Executive Officer. He was Managing Partner of Mine Management Services, LLC, in Bozeman, Montana; Vice President, Operations of Oil Recovery Enhancement LLC, Bozeman, Montana; Managing Partner of the Jardine Group LLC, Gardiner, Montana; Senior Operations & Environmental Officer and Mine General Manager at the Mineral Hill Mine, Jardine, Montana. Mr. Hoak received a B.Sc in Environmental studies (Magna Cum Laude, Departmental Research Honors) from Allegheny College in Meadville, Pennsylvania.

Committees of the Board of Directors

To date, our Board of Directors has not established a nominating and governance committee, a compensation committee, nor an audit committee.

Code of Ethics

We currently do not have a Code of Ethics.

Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance

Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, requires our Directors, executive officers, and stockholders holding more than 10% of our outstanding common stock, to file with the Securities and Exchange Commission initial reports of ownership and reports of changes in beneficial ownership of our common stock. Executive officers, directors and greater-than-10% stockholders are required by SEC regulations to furnish us with copies of all Section 16(a) reports they file.

Based on a review of Forms 3, 4, and 5 and amendments thereto furnished to the registrant during its most recent fiscal year ending July 31, 2010, the following represents each person who did not file on a timely basis reports required by Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act:

Name	Reporting Person	Form 3/# of transactions	Form 4/# of transactions	Form 5/# of transactions
Glyn Garner	CEO, President and Director	-	1	-
John Hoak	Director	1	-	-
John Rud	Vice President, Exploration	1	-	-

ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION.

The particulars of compensation paid to the following persons during the fiscal period ended July 31, 2010 and 2009 are set out in the summary compensation table below:

·	our Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer);

·	our Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer);

·	each of our three most highly compensated executive officers, other than the Principal Executive Officer and the Principal Financial Officer, who were serving as executive officers at the end of the fiscal year ended July 31, 2010; and

·	up to two additional individuals for whom disclosure would have been provided under the item above but for the fact that the individual was not serving as our executive officer at the end of the fiscal year ended July 31, 2010;

(Collectively, the “Named Executive Officers”):

SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE
Name	Fiscal Year Ended July 31,	Salary ($)	Bonus ($)	Stock Awards ($)	Option Awards ($)	Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation ($)	Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Earnings ($)	All Other Compensation ($)	Total ($)
Glyn Garner (1)	2010	35,000	0	0	0	0	0	0	$35,000
Hossein Mohseni (2)	2010	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
Hossein Mohensi	2009	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
John Rud (3)	2010	0	0	$64,973	0	0	0	0	$64,973

(1)

Mr. Garner has been our President and a Director since December 4, 2009. Subsequent to the fiscal year ending July 31, 2011, Mr. Garner invoiced the Company for the amount of $35,000, representing amounts payable from January through July 2010, at $5000/month, which amounts were accrued during the period.

(2)	Mr. Mohseni resigned as our President and a Director on December 4, 2009.

(3)

John Rud has held the position of Vice President, Exploration, since Mar 1, 2010. As part of Mr. Rud’s consulting contract commencing March 1, 2010, he was to have been issued 250,000 shares. As of July 31, 2010, the shares had not been issued, but an amount of $64,673 was expensed as consulting fees, and stock payable account was reduced accordingly.

Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End

None

Option Grants and Exercises

There were no option grants or exercises by any of the executive officers named in the Summary Compensation Table above.

Employment Agreements

We have not entered into employment agreements with our Directors and officers.

In order to undertake the operations of the Company, the Company has entered into consulting agreements with individuals to provide required services to the Company, with the particulars as follows.

On December 4, 2009, Mr. Glynn Garner was appointed President, Secretary, Treasurer, and a member of the board of directors of the Company. Mr. Garner did not enter into any formal employment or consulting agreement at the time. Subsequent to the end of the fiscal year ending July 31, 2010, the Company agreed to compensate Mr. Garner in the amount of $5,000 per month, commencing January 2010, for services provided in the capacity of President, Secretary and Treasurer, which amount was invoiced in a subsequent period and accrued in the fiscal year. Mr. Garner resigned all of his officer and director positions on December 28, 2010.

Compensation of Directors

Name	Fees Earned or Paid in Cash ($)	Stock Awards ($)	Option Awards ($)	All Other Compensation ($)	Total ($)
Glyn Garner	-0-	-0-	-0-	-0-	-0-
John Hoak (1)	$10,000	$42,830	-0-	-0-	-52,830-

(1)

Mr. Hoak was appointed a director of the Company on May 3, 2010, effective March 24, 2010, and as part of a consulting agreement entered into for the provision of services, including that of acting as a director, Mr. Hoak was issued 250,000 shares, and was entitled to earn $2,500 / month. Note that the compensation expense for the stock issuance is calculated based on the services provided from the effective date through to the end of the fiscal year. Monthly compensation was accrued but not paid for the months of April, May, June and July 2010.

During the most recent fiscal year, no directors were provided any compensation except as noted above or under Summary Compensation.

The Company has made no arrangements for the cash remuneration of its directors except as noted above, and to the extent that they will be entitled to receive reimbursement for actual, demonstrable out-of-pocket expenses, including travel expenses, if any, made on the Company’s behalf. No further remuneration has been paid to the Company’s directors for services to date, other than the stock awards granted as disclosed in the table above.

Compensation Committee

We do not currently have a compensation committee. The Company’s Executive Compensation is currently approved by the Board of Directors of the Company in the case of the Company’s Principal Executive Officer. For all other executive compensation contracts, the Principal Executive Officer negotiates and approves the contracts and compensation.

ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

The table below sets forth the number and percentage of shares of our common stock owned as of November 11, 2011, by the following persons: (i) stockholders known to us who own 5% or more of our outstanding shares, (ii) each of our Directors, and (iii) our officers and Directors as a group. Unless otherwise indicated, each of the stockholders has sole voting and investment power with respect to the shares beneficially owned.

Title of Class	Name and Address of Beneficial Owner	Amount and Nature of Beneficial Ownership	Percentage of Class (1)
Common Stock	Glyn Garner	43,200,000	56.68%
Common Stock	John Hoak	500,000	0.66%
Common Stock	John Rud	500,000	0.66%
All officers as a Group		44,200,000	57.0%

(1)	Based on 76,210,790 shares of our common stock outstanding.

Changes in Control

There are no existing arrangements that may result in a change in control of our company.

Securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans.

None

ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE

We have not entered into any transaction since the last fiscal year nor are there any proposed transactions that exceed one percent of the average of our total assets at year end for the last three completed fiscal years in which any of our Directors, executive officers, stockholders or any member of the immediate family of any of the foregoing had or is to have a direct or indirect material interest.

ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES

Audit Fees

For the year ended July 31, 2010, Etania Audit Group P.C. (previously Davis Accounting Group P.C.) billed us for $4,500 in audit fees.

Review Fees

Etania Audit Group P.C. (previously Davis Accounting Group P.C.), billed us $6,000 for reviews of our quarterly financial statements in 2010 that are not reported under Audit Fees above.

Tax and All Other Fees

We did not pay any fees to Etania Audit Group P.C. (previously Davis Accounting Group P.C.) for tax compliance, tax advice, tax planning or other work during our fiscal year ended July 31, 2010.

Pre-Approval Policies and Procedures

We have implemented pre-approval policies and procedures related to the provision of audit and non-audit services. Under these procedures, our board of directors pre-approves all services to be provided by Etania Audit Group P.C. (previously Davis Accounting Group P.C.) and the estimated fees related to these services.

PART IV

ITEM 15. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES

#	Exhibit	Reference
3.1	Articles of Incorporation.	Incorporated by reference to Registration Statement on Form SB-2 filed with the SEC on November 13, 2007
3.2	Bylaws.	Incorporated by reference to Registration Statement on Form SB-2 filed with the SEC on November 13, 2007
10.1	Purchase Agreement dated effective December 24, 2009 between GeoXplor Corp. and Quuibus Technology Inc.	Incorporated by reference to Form 8-K filed with the SEC on January 21, 2010.
10.2	Purchase Agreement dated effective December 24, 2009 between GeoXplor Corp. and Quuibus Technology Inc.	Incorporated by reference to Form 8-K filed with the SEC on January 21, 2010.
10.3	Consulting Agreement between First Liberty and John Rud dated March 1, 2010	Filed herewith
10.4	Unsecured promissory notes in the amount of $200,000 and $50,000 dated December 24, 2009 and March 15, 2010 respectively	Filed herewith
10.5	Consulting Agreement between First Liberty and John H. Hoak dated May 3, 2010	Incorporated by reference to Form 8-K filed with the SEC on August 4, 2010.
31.1	Section 302 Certification - Principal Executive Officer	Filed herewith
31.2	Section 302 Certification - Principal Financial Officer	Filed herewith
32.1	Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002	Filed herewith

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

			FIRST LIBERTY POWER CORP.

Date:	November 11, 2011	By:	/s/ Don Nicholson
		Name:	Don Nicholson
		Title:	President, Director (Principal Executive, Financial and Accounting Officer)

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

Date:	November 11, 2011	By:	/s/ Don Nicholson
		Name:	Don Nicholson
		Title:	President, Director (Principal Executive, Financial and Accounting Officer)

Date:	November 11, 2011	By:	/s/ John Hoak
		Name:	John Hoak
		Title:	Director

Attached files

Stock widget

Investing forum

First Liberty Power Corp Reports