First Connecticut Bancorp, Inc. - FORM 10-Q

Attached files

file	filename
EX-31.1 - EXHIBIT 31.1 - First Connecticut Bancorp, Inc.	ex31-1.htm
EX-32.2 - EXHIBIT 32.2 - First Connecticut Bancorp, Inc.	ex32-2.htm
EX-31.2 - EXHIBIT 31.2 - First Connecticut Bancorp, Inc.	ex31-2.htm
EX-32.1 - EXHIBIT 32.1 - First Connecticut Bancorp, Inc.	ex32-1.htm

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

x	Quarterly Report- Pursuant To Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2011

o	Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

For the transition period from to

Commission File No. 333-171913

First Connecticut Bancorp, Inc.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Maryland		45-1496206
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)		(I.R.S. Employer Identification Number)

One Farm Glen Boulevard, Farmington, CT		06032
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)		(Zip Code)

(860) 676-4600

(Registrant’s telephone number)

N/A

(Former name or former address, if changed since last report)

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject to such requirements for the past 90 days. YES x NO o.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate web site if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). YES o NO x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definition of “large accelerated filer” and “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer	o	Accelerated filer	o

Non-accelerated filer	x	Smaller reporting company	o

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). YES o NO x

As of November 14, 2011, there were 17,880,200 shares of First Connecticut Bancorp, Inc. common stock, par value $0.01, outstanding.

First Connecticut Bancorp, Inc.

Table of Contents

		Page

Part I. Financial Information

Item 1.	Consolidated Financial Statements

	Consolidated Statements of Condition at September 30, 2011 (unaudited) and December 31, 2010	1

	Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010 (unaudited)	2

	Consolidated Statement of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 (unaudited)	3

	Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010 (unaudited)	4

	Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements	5

Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	41

Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	61

Item 4.	Controls and Procedures	62

Part II. Other Information

Item 1.	Legal Proceedings	62

Item1A. Risk Factors		62

Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	62

Item 3.	Defaults Upon Senior Securities	63

Item 4.	(Removed and Reserved)	63

Item 5.	Other Information	63

Item 6.	Exhibits	63

Signatures		65

Exhibit 31.1		66
Exhibit 31.2		67
Exhibit 32.1		68
Exhibit 32.2		69

Part I. Financial Information

Item 1. Consolidated Financial Statements

First Connecticut Bancorp, Inc.

Consolidated Statements of Condition

	September 30, 2011			December 31, 2010
(Dollars in thousands)	(Unaudited)
Assets
Cash and due from banks	$	37,554		$	18,608
Federal funds sold		203,000			-
Cash and cash equivalents		240,554			18,608
Securities held-to-maturity, at amortized cost		3,621			3,672
Securities available-for-sale, at fair value		160,743			163,008
Loans held for sale		778			862
Loans, net		1,211,514			1,157,917
Premises and equipment, net		20,965			21,907
Federal Home Loan Bank of Boston stock, at cost		7,449			7,449
Accrued income receivable		3,837			4,227
Bank-owned life insurance		20,182			19,657
Deferred income taxes		13,858			11,408
Prepaid expenses and other assets		13,075			7,915
Total assets	$	1,696,576		$	1,416,630
Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity
Deposits
Interest-bearing	$	1,065,434		$	958,319
Noninterest-bearing		176,234			150,186
		1,241,668			1,108,505
FHLB advances		63,000			71,000
Repurchase agreement borrowings		21,000			21,000
Mortgagors’ escrow accounts		6,568			9,717
Repurchase liabilities		72,278			84,029
Accrued expenses and other liabilities		34,150			27,386
Total liabilities		1,438,664			1,321,637

Commitments and contingencies		-			-

Stockholders’ Equity
Common stock, $0.01 par value, 30,000,000 shares authorized, 17,880,200 shares issued and outstanding		179			-
Additional paid-in-capital		174,743			-
Unallocated common stock held by ESOP		(9,184	)		-
Retained earnings		94,927			97,513
Accumulated other comprehensive loss		(2,753	)		(2,520	)
Total stockholders’ equity		257,912			94,993
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	1,696,576		$	1,416,630

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

First Connecticut Bancorp, Inc.

Consolidated Statements of Operations (Unaudited)

	Three Months Ended				Nine Months Ended
	September 30,				September 30,
(Dollars in thousands, except Per Share data)	2011		2010		2011			2010
Interest income
Interest and fees on loans
Mortgage	$	10,573	$	10,838	$	31,716		$	31,675
Other		3,531		3,619		10,679			10,165
Interest and dividends on investments
United States Government and agency obligations		309		989		1,104			3,358
Other bonds		34		59		140			174
Corporate stocks		68		100		206			296
Other interest income		144		58		219			92
Total interest income		14,659		15,663		44,064			45,760
Interest expense
Deposits		1,886		2,059		5,792			6,160
Interest on borrowed funds		519		555		1,575			1,612
Interest on repo borrowings		182		182		540			540
Interest on repurchase liabilities		85		111		305			295
Total interest expense		2,672		2,907		8,212			8,607
Net interest income		11,987		12,756		35,852			37,153
Provision for allowance for loan losses		300		2,488		900			3,688
Net interest income after provision for loan losses		11,687		10,268		34,952			33,465
Noninterest income
Fees for customer services		852		800		2,499			2,226
Net gain on sales of investments		89		965		89			965
Net gain on loans sold		284		299		629			323
Brokerage and insurance fee income		30		102		164			317
Bank-owned life insurance income		177		187		525			485
Other		296		61		532			369
Total noninterest income		1,728		2,414		4,438			4,685
Noninterest expense
Salaries and employee benefits		7,065		5,656		21,106			16,615
Occupancy expense		1,129		1,017		3,460			3,076
Furniture and equipment expense		1,038		1,116		3,003			2,967
FDIC assessment		56		502		1,126			1,318
Marketing		505		628		1,636			1,799
Contribution to Farmington Bank Community Foundation, Inc.		-		-		6,877			-
Other operating expenses		2,152		1,836		6,325			5,101
Total noninterest expense		11,945		10,755		43,533			30,876
Income (loss) before income taxes		1,470		1,927		(4,143	)		7,274
Income tax expense (benefit)		427		533		(1,557	)		2,260
Net income (loss)	$	1,043	$	1,394	$	(2,586	)	$	5,014

Net income (loss) per share (See Note 2):
Basic and Diluted (1)	$	0.06		N/A	$	(0.20	)		N/A

Weighted average shares outstanding:
Basic and Diluted		17,244,019		N/A		17,254,646			N/A

Pro forma net income (loss) per share (2):
Basic and Diluted	$	0.06	$	0.08	$	(0.15	)	$	0.29

(1)=	Net loss per share for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 reflects earnings for the period from June 29, 2011, the date the Company completed a Plan of Conversion and Reorganization to September 30, 2011.

(2)=	Pro forma net income (loss) per share assumes the Company’s shares are outstanding for all periods prior to the completion of the Plan of Conversion and Reorganization on June 29, 2011.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

First Connecticut Bancorp, Inc.

Consolidated Statement of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity (Unaudited)

														Accumulated Other Comprehensive (Loss) Income
														Unrealized Gain			Related to
								Unallocated						on Securities			Employee Benefits
					Additional			Common						Available-for-Sale,			Plans,
	Common Stock				Paid in			Shares Held			Retained			Net of			Net of
For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2011	Shares		Amount		Capital			by ESOP			Earnings			Tax Effect			Tax Effect			Total
(Dollars in thousands)

Balance at December 31, 2010		-	$	-	$	-		$	-		$	97,513		$	1,111		$	(3,631	)	$	94,993
Issuance of common stock for initial public offering, net of expenses of $4.1 million (Note 1)		17,192,500		172		167,628			-			-			-			-			167,800
Issuance of common stock to Farmington Bank Community Foundation, Inc. including additional tax benefit due to higher basis for tax purposes		687,700		7		7,123			-			-			-			-			7,130
Purchase of common stock for Employee Stock Ownership Plan “ESOP”		-		-		(8	)		(9,717	)		-			-			-			(9,725	)
ESOP shares committed to be released		-		-		-			533			-			-			-			533
Comprehensive (loss) income:
Net loss		-		-		-			-			(2,586	)		-			-			(2,586	)
Change in accumulated other comprehensive loss related to employee benefit plans, net of tax effects		-		-		-			-			-			-			107			107
Decrease in unrealized gain on available-for-sale securities, net of tax effects		-		-		-			-			-			(340	)		-			(340	)
Total comprehensive loss																					(2,819	)
Balance at September 30, 2011		17,880,200	$	179	$	174,743		$	(9,184	)	$	94,927		$	771		$	(3,524	)	$	257,912

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

First Connecticut Bancorp, Inc.

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited)

	Nine Months Ended
	September 30,
(Dollars in thousands)	2011			2010
Cash flows from operating activities
Net (loss) income	$	(2,586	)	$	5,014
Adjustments to reconcile net (loss) income to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities:
Provision for allowance for loan losses		900			3,688
Provision for off-balance sheet commitments		34			4
Depreciation and amortization		2,310			2,198
Gain on sale of investments		(89	)		(965	)
Amortization of ESOP expense		533			-
Contribution of stock to Farmington Bank Community Foundation, Inc.		6,877			-
Loans originated for sale		(39,048	)		(13,087	)
Proceeds from the sale of loans held for sale		38,899			9,978
Net gain on loans sold		(629	)		(323	)
Loss on sale of foreclosed real estate		-			48
Accretion and amortization of investment security discounts and premiums, net		(94	)		133
Amortization and accretion of loan fees and discounts, net		(106	)		(335	)
Decrease (increase) in accrued income receivable		390			(27	)
Deferred income tax benefit		(2,077	)		(661	)
Increase in cash surrender value of bank-owned life insurance		(525	)		(485	)
Increase in prepaid expenses and other assets		(5,156	)		(13,259	)
Increase in accrued expenses and other liabilities		6,892			2,490
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities		6,525			(5,589	)
Cash flow from investing activities
Maturities of securities held-to-maturity		260			-
Sales and maturities of securities available-for-sale		304,013			114,835
Purchases of securities held-to-maturity		(209	)		(259	)
Purchases of securities available-for-sale		(302,080	)		(141,708	)
Loan originations, net of principal repayments		(53,677	)		(102,321	)
Proceeds from sale of foreclosed real estate		144			374
Purchases of bank-owned life insurance		-			(5,007	)
Purchases of premises and equipment		(1,368	)		(3,596	)
Net cash used in investing activities		(52,917	)		(137,682	)
Cash flows from financing activities
Proceeds from common stock offering, net of offering cost		167,800			-
Purchase of common stock for ESOP		(9,725	)		-
Net (decrease) increase in borrowings		(8,000	)		6,000
Net increase in demand deposits, NOW accounts, savings accounts and money market accounts		175,501			265,637
Net decrease in certificates of deposit		(42,338	)		(28,497	)
Net (decrease) increase in repurchase liabilities		(11,751	)		10,674
Change in mortgagors’ escrow accounts		(3,149	)		(3,268	)
Net cash provided by financing activities		268,338			250,546
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents		221,946			107,275
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period		18,608			28,299
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	240,554		$	135,574

Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information
Cash paid for interest	$	8,223		$	8,604
Cash paid for income taxes		854			2,282
Loans transferred to other real estate owned		148			128

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

First Connecticut Bancorp, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

1.	Nature of Operations and Basis of Presentation

Organization and Business

On June 29, 2011, the Boards of Directors of Farmington Bank, a Connecticut stock savings bank (the “Bank”), First Connecticut Bancorp, Inc., a Maryland-chartered corporation (the “Company”), First Connecticut Bancorp, Inc., a Connecticut-chartered nonstock corporation and mutual holding company (the “MHC”) and Farmington Holdings, Inc., a Connecticut-chartered corporation (the “Mid-Tier”) completed a Plan of Conversion and Reorganization whereby: (1) the MHC converted from the mutual holding company form of organization to the stock holding company form of organization, (2) the Company sold shares of common stock of the Company in a subscription offering, and (3) the Company contributed shares of Company common stock equal to 4.0% of the shares sold in the subscription offering to the Farmington Bank Community Foundation, Inc. (the “Conversion and Reorganization”). First Connecticut Bancorp, Inc. sold 17,192,500 shares of its common stock to eligible stock holders at $10.00 per share for proceeds of $167.8 million, net of offering costs of $4.1 million. On June 29, 2011, with the completion of the Conversion and Reorganization, First Connecticut Bancorp, Inc. is 100% owned by public shareholders and the MHC and the Mid-Tier ceased to exist.

In connection with the Conversion and Reorganization, the Company established Farmington Bank Community Foundation, Inc., a non-profit charitable organization dedicated to helping the communities the Bank serves. The Foundation was funded with a contribution of 687,700 shares of the Company’s common stock, representing 4% of the outstanding shares. The stock donation resulted in a $6.9 million contribution expense being recorded and an additional $253,000 deferred tax benefit was recognized as the basis of the contribution for tax purposes is equal to the stock’s trading price at the close of the first day of trading which was higher than the initial issuance price used to record the contribution expense.

As part of the reorganization, the Company established an Employee Stock Ownership Plan (“ESOP”) for eligible employees. The Company loaned the ESOP the amount needed to purchase up to 1,430,416 shares or 8.0% of the Company’s common stock issued in the offering. As of September 30, 2011, the ESOP purchased 883,354, shares of common stock at a cost of $9.7 million. The Bank intends to make annual contributions adequate to fund the payment of regular debt service requirements attributable to the indebtedness of the ESOP.

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of First Connecticut Bancorp, Inc. and its wholly-owned subsidiary, Farmington Bank (formerly known as Farmington Savings Bank), (collectively, the “Company”). Significant inter-company accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

First Connecticut Bancorp, Inc.’s only subsidiary is Farmington Bank. Farmington Bank’s main office is located in Farmington, Connecticut. Farmington Bank operates sixteen full service branch offices and four limited services offices in central Connecticut. Farmington Bank’s primary source of income is interest received on loans to customers, which include small and middle market businesses and individuals residing within Farmington Bank’s service area.

Wholly-owned subsidiaries of Farmington Bank include Farmington Savings Loan Servicing, Inc., a passive investment company for Connecticut income tax purposes that was established to service and hold loans collateralized by real property; Village Investments, Inc. which holds the Company’s investment in Infinex Financial Services, a registered broker-dealer; the Village Corp., Limited, a subsidiary that holds certain real estate; 28 Main Street Corp., presently inactive; Village Management Corp., presently inactive and Village Square Holdings, Inc., a subsidiary that holds certain bank premises and other real estate.

First Connecticut Bancorp, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

Basis of Financial Statement Presentation

The consolidated financial statements have been prepared pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. The Company has condensed or omitted certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in the consolidated financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America pursuant to such rules and regulations. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) considered necessary for a fair statement have been included. All significant intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated in consolidation. These consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2010 included in the Company’s S-1/A filed on May 16, 2011. The results of operations for the interim periods are not necessarily indicative of the results for the full year.

In preparing the consolidated financial statements, management is required to make extensive use of estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities as of the date of the statement of condition and revenues and expenses for the interim period. Actual results could differ significantly from those estimates. Material estimates that are particularly susceptible to significant change in the near term relate to the determination of the allowance for loan losses, investment security other-than-temporary impairment judgments and investment security valuation.

Reclassifications

Amounts in prior period consolidated financial statements are reclassified whenever necessary to conform to the current year presentation.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

ASU No. 2011-02, “Receivables (Topic 310) — A Creditor’s Determination of Whether a Restructuring Is a Troubled Debt Restructuring.” On April 5, 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-02 to clarify when a loan modification or restructuring is considered a troubled debt restructuring (“TDR”). The changes apply to a lender that modifies a receivable covered by Subtopic 310-40, “Receivables—Troubled Debt Restructurings by Creditors.” In evaluating whether a restructuring constitutes a TDR, a creditor must separately conclude that both of the following exist: (i) the restructuring constitutes a concession and (ii) the debtor is experiencing financial difficulties. A creditor may determine that a debtor is experiencing financial difficulties, even though the debtor is not currently in default, if the creditor determines it is probable that the debtor would default on its payments for any of its debts in the foreseeable future without the loan modification. Lenders who determine that they are making a concession on the terms of the loan to a borrower who is having financial problems should follow the guidance found in ASU No. 2011-02. The Company adopted the provisions of ASU No. 2011-02 retrospectively to all modifications and restructuring activities that have occurred from January 1, 2011. As of September 30, 2011, the Company identified $7.5 million in loans that were newly considered troubled debt restructurings under the provisions of ASU No. 2011-02. The loans did not require an allowance as each was either previously partially charged-off or was adequately secured by collateral. See Note 4 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for the disclosures required by ASU No. 2010-02.

First Connecticut Bancorp, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

ASU No. 2011-03, “Transfers and Servicing (Topic 860) - Reconsideration of Effective Control for Repurchase Agreements.” In April 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-03 to clarify the determination of whether an entity may or may not recognize a sale upon transfer of financial assets subject to repurchase agreements. The changes remove from the assessment of effective control: (i) the criterion requiring the transferor to have the ability to repurchase or redeem the financial assets on substantially the agreed terms, even in the event of default by the transferee, and (ii) the collateral maintenance implementation guidance related to that criterion. As a result, it is anticipated that most repurchase agreements will not qualify for derecognition from the transferor’s financial statements. This change is effective for the Company’s interim and annual reporting periods beginning on or after December 15, 2011 and will be applied prospectively to new transactions or modifications of existing transactions after the effective date. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of the adoption of this accounting standards update on its consolidated financial statements and does not expect the application of this guidance will have a material impact as the Company has been accounting for its repurchase agreements as secured financing.

First Connecticut Bancorp, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

ASU No. 2011-04, “Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820) - Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurements and Disclosure Requirements in U.S. GAAP and IFRSs.” In May 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-04 which will supersede most of the accounting guidance currently found in Topic 820 of FASB’s ASC. The amendments will improve comparability of fair value measurements presented and disclosed in financial statements prepared with GAAP and International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRS”). The amendments also clarify the application of existing fair value measurement requirements. These amendments include (1) the application of the highest and best use and valuation premise concepts, (2) measuring the fair value of an instrument classified in a reporting entity’s shareholders’ equity and (3) disclosing quantitative information about the unobservable inputs used within the Level 3 hierarchy. The guidance is effective for the Company’s interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2011 and will be applied prospectively. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of the adoption of this accounting standards update on the Company’s consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.

In June 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-05, Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Presentation of Comprehensive Income. Under the amendments to Topic 220, an entity has the option to present the total of comprehensive income, the components of net income and the components of other comprehensive income either in a single continuous statement of comprehensive income or in two separate but consecutive statements. In both choices, an entity is required to present each component of net income along with total net income, each component of other comprehensive income along with a total for other comprehensive income, and a total amount for comprehensive income. This update eliminates the option to present the components of other comprehensive income as part of the statement of changes in stockholders’ equity. The amendments in this update do not change the items that must be reported in other comprehensive income or when an item of other comprehensive income must be reclassified to net income. The amendments in this update should be applied retrospectively. For public entities, the amendments are effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2011. Early adoption is permitted, because compliance with the amendments is already permitted. The amendments do not require any transition disclosures. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of the adoption of this accounting standards update on the Company’s consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.

2.	Earnings Per Share

Basic net (loss) income per common share is calculated by dividing the net income (loss) available to common stockholders by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted net income (loss) per common share is computed in a manner similar to basic net income (loss) per common share except that the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding is increased to include the incremental common shares (as computed using the treasury stock method) that would have been outstanding if all potentially dilutive common stock (i.e. stock options) were issued during the period. The Company had no dilutive or anti-dilutive common shares outstanding during the year. Unallocated common shares held by the ESOP are not included in the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding for purposes of calculating both basic and diluted income (loss) per common share.

Earnings per share data is not presented in these consolidated financial statements prior to June 29, 2011 since shares of common stock were not issued until June 29, 2011; therefore, per share information for prior periods is not meaningful. Pro forma earnings per share are reported in the Consolidated Statements of Operations which assume the shares of the Company issued on June 29, 2011 are outstanding for all periods presented.

First Connecticut Bancorp, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

The following table sets forth the calculation of basic and diluted earnings per common share for the three months ended September, 2011 and for the period from June 29, 2011 to September 30, 2011:

	For the three months ending September 30, 2011		For the Period from June 29, 2011 to September 30, 2011

(Dollars in thousands, except Per Share data):

Net income (loss)	$	1,043	$	(3,451	)

Weighted-average common shares		17,244,019		17,254,646

Net income (loss) per common share:
Basic and Diluted	$	0.06	$	(0.20	)

First Connecticut Bancorp, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

3.	Investment Securities

Investment securities are summarized as follows:

	September 30, 2011
			Gross		Gross
	Amortized		Unrealized		Unrealized			Market
(Dollars in thousands)	Cost		Gains		Losses			Value
Available-for-sale
Debt securities:
U.S. Treasury obligations	$	130,998	$	-	$	-		$	130,998
Government sponsored residential mortgage-backed securities		21,687		1,412		(3	)		23,096
Corporate debt securities		1,000		115		-			1,115
Trust preferred debt securities		42		-		-			42
Preferred equity securities		2,100		164		(559	)		1,705
Marketable equity securities		348		11		(6	)		353
Mutual funds		3,399		35		-			3,434
Total securities available-for-sale	$	159,574	$	1,737	$	(568	)	$	160,743
Held-to-maturity
Government sponsored residential mortgage-backed securities	$	9	$	-	$	-		$	9
Municipal debt securities		612		-		-			612
Trust preferred debt security		3,000		-		-			3,000
Total securities held-to-maturity	$	3,621	$	-	$	-		$	3,621


	December 31, 2010
			Gross		Gross
	Amortized		Unrealized		Unrealized			Market
(Dollars in thousands)	Cost		Gains		Losses			Value
Available-for-sale
Debt securities:
U.S. Treasury obligations	$	112,973	$	2	$	-		$	112,975
U.S. Government agency obligations		11,004		76		-			11,080
Government sponsored residential mortgage-backed securities		30,516		1,780		(2	)		32,294
Corporate debt securities		1,000		52		-			1,052
Trust preferred debt securities		44		-		-			44
Preferred equity securities		2,110		43		(293	)		1,860
Marketable equity securities		398		10		(2	)		406
Mutual funds		3,280		17		-			3,297
Total securities available-for-sale	$	161,325	$	1,980	$	(297	)	$	163,008
Held-to-maturity
Government sponsored residential mortgage-backed securities	$	9	$	-	$	-			9
Municipal debt securities		663		-		-			663
Trust preferred debt security		3,000		-		-			3,000
Total securities held-to-maturity	$	3,672	$	-	$	-		$	3,672

First Connecticut Bancorp, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

The following table summarizes gross unrealized losses and fair value, aggregated by investment category and length of time the investments have been in a continuous unrealized loss position at September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010:

	Less than 12 Months					12 Months or More					Total
			Gross					Gross					Gross
	Fair		Unrealized			Fair		Unrealized			Fair		Unrealized
(Dollars in thousands)	Value		Loss			Value		Loss			Value		Loss
September 30, 2011
Available-for-sale:
Government sponsored residential mortgage-backed securities	$	-	$	-		$	166	$	(3	)	$	166	$	(3	)
Preferred equity securities		87		(13	)		1,454		(546	)		1,541		(559	)
Marketable equity securities		47		(2	)		3		(4	)		50		(6	)
Total	$	134	$	(15	)	$	1,623	$	(553	)	$	1,757	$	(568	)

December 31, 2010
Available-for-sale:
Government sponsored residential mortgage-backed securities	$	-	$	-		$	335	$	(2	)	$	335	$	(2	)
Preferred equity securities		95		(5	)		1,722		(288	)		1,817		(293	)
Marketable equity securities		-		-			5		(2	)		5		(2	)
Total	$	95	$	(5	)	$	2,062	$	(292	)	$	2,157	$	(297	)

Management believes that no individual unrealized loss as of September 30, 2011 represents an other-than-temporary impairment, based on its detailed quarterly review of the securities portfolio. Among other things, the other-than-temporary impairment review of the investment securities portfolio focuses on the combined factors of percentage and length of time an issue is below book value as well as consideration of issuer specific factors (present value of cash flows expected to be collected, issuer rating changes and trends, credit worthiness and review of underlying collateral, if applicable). The Company also considers whether or not it has the intent to sell the security prior to maturity as well as the extent to which the unrealized loss is attributable to changes in interest rates.

The unrealized loss on preferred equity securities in a loss position for 12 months or more relates to one preferred equity security that is rated Baa2 by Moody’s as of September 30, 2011. A detailed review of the preferred equity security was completed by management and procedures included an analysis of their most recent financial statements and management concluded that the preferred equity security is not other-than-temporarily impaired.

The Company has no intent to sell nor is it more likely than not that the Company will be required to sell any of the securities contained in the table during the period of time necessary to recover the unrealized losses, which may be until maturity.

During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, the Company recorded no other-than-temporary impairment charges.

The Company’s net realized gains totaled $89,000 and $965,000 for the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively.

First Connecticut Bancorp, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

The amortized cost and estimated market value of debt securities at September 30, 2011 by contractual maturity are shown below. Expected maturities may differ from contractual maturities because borrowers may have the right to call or repay obligations with or without call or repayment penalties:

	September 30, 2011
	Available for Sale				Held to Maturity
			Estimated				Estimated
	Amortized		Market		Amortized		Market
	Cost		Value		Cost		Value
(Dollars in thousands)
Due in one year or less	$	130,998	$	130,998	$	612	$	612
Due after one year through five years		-		-		-		-
Due after five years through ten years		1,000		1,115		-		-
Due after ten years		42		42		3,000		3,000
Government sponsored residential mortgage-backed securities		21,687		23,096		9		9
	$	153,727	$	155,251	$	3,621	$	3,621

The Company, as a member of the Federal Home Loan Bank of Boston (FHLBB), owned $7.4 million of FHLBB capital stock at September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, which is equal to its FHLBB capital stock requirement.

4.	Loans and Allowance for Loan Losses

Loans consisted of the following:

	September 30, 2011			December 31, 2010
(Dollars in thousands)
Real estate
Residential	$	471,816		$	453,557
Commercial		389,166			361,838
Construction		50,622			46,623
Installment		11,290			12,597
Commercial		125,469			112,535
Collateral		2,290			1,941
Home equity line of credit		98,658			81,837
Demand		42			227
Revolving credit		92			84
Resort		75,860			105,215
Total loans		1,225,305			1,176,454
Less:
Allowance for loan losses		(16,094	)		(20,734	)
Net deferred loan costs		2,303			2,197
Loans, net	$	1,211,514		$	1,157,917

First Connecticut Bancorp, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

A summary of changes in the allowance for loan losses for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010 are as follows:

	For the Three Months Ended September 30,						For the Nine Months Ended September 30,
(Dollars in thousands)	2011			2010			2011			2010
Balance at beginning of period	$	15,912		$	16,169		$	20,734		$	16,316
Provision for loan losses		300			2,488			900			3,688
Charge-offs		(122	)		(478	)		(5,561	)		(1,854	)
Recoveries		4			17			21			46
Balance at end of period	$	16,094		$	18,196		$	16,094		$	18,196

Changes in the allowance for loan losses by segments for the three months ended September 30, 2011 are as follows:

	For the Three Months Ended September 30, 2011
	Balance at beginning of period		Charge-offs			Recoveries		Provision for (Reduction) loan losses			Balance at end of period
(Dollars in thousands)
Real estate
Residential	$	3,484	$	-		$	-	$	(350	)	$	3,134
Commercial		6,500		(25	)		-		917			7,392
Construction		602		-			-		55			657
Installment		78		-			-		16			94
Commercial		1,858		(34	)		-		(145	)		1,679
Collateral		-		-			-		-			-
Home equity line of credit		629		(47	)		-		285			867
Demand		1		-			4		(5	)		-
Revolving credit		1		(16	)		-		16			1
Resort		2,260		-			-		(315	)		1,945
Unallocated		499		-			-		(174	)		325
	$	15,912	$	(122	)	$	4	$	300		$	16,094

First Connecticut Bancorp, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

Changes in the allowance for loan losses by segments for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 are as follows:


	For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2011
	Balance at beginning of period		Charge-offs			Recoveries		Provision for (Reduction) loan losses			Balance at end of period
(Dollars in thousands)
Real estate
Residential	$	3,056	$	(332	)	$	-	$	410		$	3,134
Commercial		7,726		(25	)		-		(309	)		7,392
Construction		524		-			-		133			657
Installment		115		(5	)		1		(16	)		95
Commercial		1,564		(203	)		10		308			1,679
Collateral		-		-			-		-			-
Home equity line of credit		558		(72	)		-		381			867
Demand		3		-			10		(13	)		-
Revolving credit		-		(44	)		-		44			-
Resort		7,188		(4,880	)		-		(363	)		1,945
Unallocated		-		-			-		325			325
	$	20,734	$	(5,561	)	$	21	$	900		$	16,094

First Connecticut Bancorp, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

The following table lists the allocation of the allowance by impairment methodology and by loan segment at September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010:

Loans individually evaluated for impairment:


	September 30, 2011				December 31, 2010
	Total		Reserve Allocation		Total		Reserve Allocation
(Dollars in thousands)	Total		Reserve Allocation		Total		Reserve Allocation
Real estate
Residential	$	11,200	$	485	$	7,001	$	358
Commercial		19,846		1,222		14,211		260
Construction		564		24		897		-
Installment		-		-		-		-
Commercial		7,631		56		2,795		-
Collateral		-		-		-		-
Home equity line of credit		1,328		155		1,228		48
Demand		-		-		-		-
Revolving Credit		-		-		-		-
Resort		-		-		4,880		4,880
Total	$	40,569	$	1,942	$	31,012	$	5,546

Loans collectively evaluated for impairment:

	September 30, 2011				December 31, 2010
	Total		Reserve Allocation		Total		Reserve Allocation
(Dollars in thousands)	Total		Reserve Allocation		Total		Reserve Allocation
Real estate
Residential	$	462,681	$	2,649	$	448,553	$	2,698
Commercial		369,348		6,170		347,625		7,466
Construction		50,019		633		45,715		524
Installment		11,290		94		12,597		115
Commercial		118,215		1,623		110,057		1,564
Collateral		2,290		-		1,941		-
Home equity line of credit		97,330		712		80,609		510
Demand		42		-		227		3
Revolving Credit		92		1		84		-
Resort		75,732		1,945		100,231		2,308
Total	$	1,187,039	$	13,827	$	1,147,639	$	15,188
Unallocated		-		325		-		-
Total	$	1,227,608	$	16,094	$	1,178,651	$	20,734

First Connecticut Bancorp, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

The following is a summary of loan delinquencies at recorded investment values at September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010:

	September 30, 2011
	30-59 Days				60-89 Days				> 90 Days								Past Due 90 Days or More and Still Accruing
(Dollars in thousands)	Past Due				Past Due				Past Due				Total
	Number		Amount		Number		Amount		Number		Amount		Number		Amount
Real estate
Residential		9	$	1,547		5	$	1,211		18	$	9,412		32	$	12,170	$	-
Commercial		1		968		1		255		7		5,374		9		6,597		-
Construction		-		-		-		-		1		564		1		564		-
Installment		5		72		2		83		2		65		9		220		-
Commercial		2		315		1		360		10		1,091		13		1,766		-
Collateral		8		110		-		-		-		-		8		110		-
Home equity line of credit		1		124		-		-		4		1,337		5		1,461		-
Demand		-		-		-		-		1		25		1		25		-
Revolving Credit		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
Resort		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
Total		26	$	3,136		9	$	1,909		43	$	17,868		78	$	22,913	$	-

	December 31, 2010
	30-59 Days				60-89 Days				> 90 Days								Past Due 90 Days or More and Still Accruing
(Dollars in thousands)	Past Due				Past Due				Past Due				Total
	Number		Amount		Number		Amount		Number		Amount		Number		Amount
Real estate
Residential		6	$	1,273		6	$	4,624		10	$	4,128		22	$	10,025	$	-
Commercial		2		456		2		793		6		3,160		10		4,409		-
Construction		-		-		-		-		2		897		2		897		-
Installment		4		25		-		-		5		98		9		123		-
Commercial		5		456		-		-		10		761		15		1,217		-
Collateral		4		42		-		-		-		-		4		42		-
Home equity line of credit		2		100		1		24		5		1,843		8		1,967		-
Demand		-		-		-		-		1		25		1		25		-
Revolving Credit		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
Resort		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
Total		23	$	2,352		9	$	5,441		39	$	10,912		71	$	18,705	$	-

First Connecticut Bancorp, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

Nonperforming assets consist of non-accruing loans and loans past due more than 90 days and still accruing interest and other real estate owned. Nonperforming assets were:

(Dollars in thousands)	September 30, 2011		December 31, 2010
Nonaccrual loans:
Real estate
Residential	$	9,692	$	5,209
Commercial		5,374		3,693
Construction		564		898
Installment		152		124
Commercial		1,184		862
Collateral		-		-
Home equity line of credit		1,451		2,031
Demand		25		25
Revolving Credit		-		-
Resort		-		4,880
Total nonaccruing loans		18,442		17,722
Loans 90 days past due and still accruing		-		-
Real estate owned		242		238
Total nonperforming assets	$	18,684	$	17,960

First Connecticut Bancorp, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

The following is a summary of impaired loans at September 30, 2011:

	September 30, 2011
			Unpaid
	Recorded		Principal		Related
(Dollars in thousands)	Investment		Balance		Allowance
Impaired loans without a valuation allowance:
Real estate
Residential	$	5,223	$	5,355	$	-
Commercial		10,538		11,527		-
Construction		-		-		-
Installment		-		-		-
Commercial		6,848		6,846		-
Collateral		-		-		-
Home equity line of credit		329		400		-
Demand		-		-		-
Revolving Credit		-		-		-
Resort		-		-		-
Total		22,938		24,128		-

Impaired loans with a valuation allowance:
Real estate
Residential		5,977		6,290		485
Commercial		9,308		9,308		1,222
Construction		564		810		24
Installment		-		-		-
Commercial		783		930		56
Collateral		-		-		-
Home equity line of credit		999		999		155
Demand		-		-		-
Revolving Credit		-		-		-
Resort		-		-		-
Total		17,631		18,337		1,942
Total impaired loans	$	40,569	$	42,465	$	1,942

First Connecticut Bancorp, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

The following is a summary of information pertaining to impaired loans at December 31, 2010:

	December 31, 2010
			Unpaid
	Recorded		Principal		Related
(Dollars in thousands)	Investment		Balance		Allowance
Impaired loans without a valuation allowance:
Real estate
Residential	$	2,710	$	2,703	$	-
Commercial		7,974		8,982		-
Construction		897		1,143		-
Installment		-		-		-
Commercial		2,795		2,803		-
Collateral		-		-		-
Home equity line of credit		999		999		-
Demand		-		-		-
Revolving Credit		-		-		-
Resort		-		-		-
Total		15,375		16,630		-

Impaired loans with a valuation allowance:
Real estate
Residential		4,291		4,306		358
Commercial		6,237		6,237		260
Construction		-		-		-
Installment		-		-		-
Commercial		-		-		-
Collateral		-		-		-
Home equity line of credit		229		300		48
Demand		-		-		-
Revolving Credit		-		-		-
Resort		4,880		4,880		4,880
Total		15,637		15,723		5,546
Total impaired loans	$	31,012	$	32,353	$	5,546

Troubled Debt Restructuring

A loan is considered a troubled debt restructuring (“TDR”) when we, for economic or legal reasons related to the borrower’s financial difficulties, grant a concession to the borrower in modifying or renewing the loan that we would not otherwise consider. In connection with troubled debt restructurings, terms may be modified to fit the ability of the borrower to repay in line with their current financial status, which may include a reduction in the interest rate to market rate or below, a change in the term or movement of past due amounts to the back-end of the loan or refinancing. A loan is placed on non-accrual status upon being restructured, even if it was not previously, unless the modified loan was current for the six months prior to its modification and we believe the loan is fully collectable in accordance with its new terms. Our policy to restore a restructured loan to performing status is dependent on the receipt of regular payments, generally for a period of six months and one calendar year-end. All troubled debt restructurings are classified as impaired loans and are reviewed for impairment by management on a regular basis and at calendar year-end reporting period per our policy.

First Connecticut Bancorp, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

The recorded investment balance of TDRs approximated $30.7 million and $27.0 million at September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively. At September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the majority of the Company’s TDRs are on accrual status. TDRs on accrual status were $19.6 million and $16.9 million while TDRs on nonaccrual status were $11.1 million and $10.1 million at September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively. At September 30, 2011, 100% of the accruing TDRs have been performing in accordance with the restructured terms. At September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the allowance for loan losses included specific reserves of $1.7 million and $5.5 million related to TDRs, respectively. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011, the Bank had no charged offs related to TDRs deemed to be uncollectible. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010, the Bank charged off $-0- and $765,000, for the portion of TDRs deemed to be uncollectible, respectively. The amount of additional funds committed to borrowers in TDR status was $196,000 and $6,000 at September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively. The Bank in very rare circumstances may provide additional funds committed to borrowers in TDR status.

The following table presents information on loans whose terms had been modified in a troubled debt restructuring at September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010:


	September 30, 2011
	TDRs on Accrual Status				TDRs on Nonaccrual Status				Total TDRs
(Dollars in thousands)	Number of Loans		Balance of Loans		Number of Loans		Balance of Loans		Number of Loans		Balance of Loans
Real estate
Residential		3	$	1,076		5	$	5,303		8	$	6,379
Commercial		8		13,198		4		4,113		12		17,311
Construction		-		-		1		564		1		564
Installment		-		-		-		-		-		-
Commercial		6		5,299		1		147		7		5,446
Collateral		-		-		-		-		-		-
Home equity line of credit		-		-		1		999		1		999
Demand		-		-		-		-		-		-
Revolving Credit		-		-		-		-		-		-
Resort		-		-		-		-		-		-
Total		17	$	19,573		12	$	11,126		29	$	30,699

	December 31, 2010
	TDRs on Accrual Status				TDRs on Nonaccrual Status				Total
(Dollars in thousands)	Number of Loans		Recorded Investment		Number of Loans		Recorded Investment		Number of Loans		Recorded Investment
Real estate
Residential		5	$	4,449		2	$	697		7	$	5,146
Commercial		5		10,544		3		2,449		8		12,993
Construction		-		-		2		897		2		897
Installment		-		-		-		-		-		-
Commercial		5		1,932		1		146		6		2,078
Collateral		-		-		-		-		-		-
Home equity line of credit		-		-		1		999		1		999
Demand		-		-		-		-		-		-
Revolving Credit		-		-		-		-		-		-
Resort		-		-		1		4,880		1		4,880
Total		15	$	16,925		10	$	10,068		25	$	26,993

First Connecticut Bancorp, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

The following tables include the recorded investment and number of modifications for modified loans. The Company reports the recorded investment in the loans prior to a modification and also the recorded investment in the loans after the loans were restructured for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011:


	For the Three Months Ended September 30, 2011						For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2011
(Dollars in thousands)	Number of Modifications		Recorded Investment Prior to Modification		Recorded Investment After Modification (1)		Number of Modifications		Recorded Investment Prior to Modification		Recorded Investment After Modification (1)
Real estate
Residential		2	$	3,647	$	3,647		6	$	5,822	$	5,686
Commercial		5		7,057		7,049		5		7,057		7,049
Construction		-		-		-		-		-		-
Installment		-		-		-		-		-		-
Commercial		2		3,659		3,609		5		5,100		4,999
Collateral		-		-		-		-		-		-
Home equity line of credit		-		-		-		-		-		-
Demand		-		-		-		-		-		-
Revolving Credit		-		-		-		-		-		-
Resort		-		-		-		-		-		-
Total		9	$	14,363	$	14,305		16	$	17,979	$	17,734

(1) The period end balances are inclusive of all partial paydowns and charge-offs since the modification date.

TDR loans may be modified by means of extended maturity, below market adjusted interest rates, a combination of rate and maturity, or by other means including covenant modifications, forbearance and /or the concessions. For the three months ended September 30, 2011, the bank modified four commercial real estate loans totaling $3.7 million and one commercial loan totaling $3.5 million by extending the maturity date, one commercial real estate loan totaling $3.3 million by a combination of rate and maturity and two residential real estate loans totaling $3.6 million and one commercial loan totaling $93,000 by other means including covenant modifications, forbearance and /or other concessions. For the nine months ended September 30, 2011, the bank modified four commercial real estate loans totaling $3.7 million and two commercial loans totaling $3.7 million by extending the maturity date, one residential real estate loan totaling $124,000 by adjusting interest rate, one commercial real estate loans totaling $3.3 million and two commercial loans totaling $1.2 million by a combination of rate and maturity and five residential real estate loans totaling $5.6 million and one commercial loan totaling $93,000 by other means including covenant modifications, forbearance and/or other concessions.

The following table shows loans modified in a TDR from October 1, 2010 through September 30, 2011 that subsequently defaulted (i.e., 30 days or more past due following a modification) during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011.


	Loans Modified as a TDR within the Previous Twelve Months that Subsequently Defaulted During the Three Months Ended September 30, 2011				Loans Modified as a TDR within the Previous Twelve Months that Subsequently Defaulted During the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2011
(Dollars in thousands)	Number of Loans		Recorded Investment (1)		Number of Loans		Recorded Investment (1)
Real estate
Residential		-	$	-		2	$	1,649
Commercial		-		-		1		330
Construction		-		-		-		-
Installment		-		-		-		-
Commercial		-		-		-		-
Collateral		-		-		-		-
Home equity line of credit		-		-		-		-
Demand		-		-		-		-
Revolving Credit		-		-		-		-
Resort		-		-		-		-
Total		-	$	-		3	$	1,979

(1) The period end balances are inclusive of all partial paydowns and charge-offs since the modification date. Loans modified in a TDR that were fully paid down, charged-off or foreclosed upon by period end are not reported.

First Connecticut Bancorp, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

Credit Quality Information

At the time of loan origination, a risk rating based on a nine point grading system is assigned to each commercial-related loan based on the loan officer’s and management’s assessment of the risk associated with each particular loan. This risk assessment is based on an in depth analysis of a variety of factors. More complex loans and larger commitments require that our internal credit risk management department further evaluate the risk rating of the individual loan or relationship, with credit risk management having final determination of the appropriate risk rating. These more complex loans and relationships receive ongoing periodic review to assess the appropriate risk rating on a post-closing basis with changes made to the risk rating as the borrower’s and economic conditions warrant. Our risk rating system is designed to be a dynamic system and we grade loans on a “real time” basis. The Company places considerable emphasis on risk rating accuracy, risk rating justification, and risk rating triggers. Our risk rating process has been enhanced with our recent implementation of industry-based risk rating “cards.” The cards are used by our loan officers and promote risk rating accuracy and consistency on an institution-wide basis. Most loans are reviewed annually as part of a comprehensive portfolio review conducted by management and/or by our independent loan review firm. More frequent reviews of loans rated low pass, special mention, substandard and doubtful are conducted by our credit risk management department. We utilize an independent loan review consulting firm to affirm our rating accuracy and opine on the overall credit quality of our loan portfolio. The examination is designed to provide an evaluation of the portfolio with respect to risk rating profile as well as with regard to the soundness of individual loan files. The individual loan reviews include an analysis of the creditworthiness of obligors, via appropriate key ratios and cash flow analysis and an assessment of collateral protection. The consulting firm conducts two loan reviews per year aiming at a 65.0% or higher commercial and industrial loans and commercial real estate portfolio penetration. Summary findings of all loan reviews performed by the outside consulting firm are reported to our board of directors and senior management upon completion.

The Company utilizes a nine point risk rating scale as follows:

Risk Rating Definitions

Residential and consumer loans are not rated unless they are 45 days or more delinquent, in which case, depending on past-due days, they will be rated 6, 7 or 8.


Loans rated 1 – 5:	Commercial loans in these categories are considered “pass” rated loans with low to average risk.

Loans rated 6:	Residential, Consumer and Commercial loans in this category are considered “special mention.” These loans are starting to show signs of potential weakness and are being closely monitored by management.

Loans rated 7:	Loans in this category are considered “substandard.” Generally, a loan is considered substandard if it is inadequately protected by the current net worth and paying capacity of the obligors and/or the collateral pledged. There is a distinct possibility that the Company will sustain some loss if the weakness is not corrected.

Loans rated 8:	Loans in this category are considered “doubtful.” Loans classified as doubtful have all the weaknesses inherent in those classified substandard with the added characteristic that the weaknesses make collection or liquidation in full, on the basis of currently existing facts, highly questionable and improbable.

Loans rated 9:	Loans in this category are considered uncollectible (“loss”) and of such little value that their continuance as loans is not warranted.

First Connecticut Bancorp, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

The following table presents the Company’s loans by risk rating at September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010:

	September 30, 2011
(Dollars in thousands)	Pass		Special Mention		Substandard		Doubtful		Total
Real estate
Residential	$	458,706	$	2,641	$	10,469	$	-	$	471,816
Commercial		346,243		11,733		31,190		-		389,166
Construction		46,550		582		3,490		-		50,622
Installment		10,980		158		152		-		11,290
Commercial		105,905		3,214		16,350		-		125,469
Collateral		2,282		8		-		-		2,290
Home equity line of credit		96,337		870		1,451		-		98,658
Demand		17		-		25		-		42
Revolving Credit		92		-		-		-		92
Resort		57,037		5,911		12,912		-		75,860
Total Loans	$	1,124,149	$	25,117	$	76,039	$	-	$	1,225,305

	December 31, 2010
(Dollars in thousands)	Pass		Special Mention		Substandard		Doubtful		Total
Real estate
Residential	$	442,255	$	2,025	$	9,277	$	-	$	453,557
Commercial		319,383		13,418		29,037		-		361,838
Construction		38,791		1,611		6,221		-		46,623
Installment		12,452		13		132		-		12,597
Commercial		92,015		5,833		14,687		-		112,535
Collateral		1,933		8		-		-		1,941
Home equity line of credit		79,468		277		2,092		-		81,837
Demand		202		-		25		-		227
Revolving Credit		84		-		-		-		84
Resort		84,981		-		20,234		-		105,215
Total Loans	$	1,071,564	$	23,185	$	81,705	$	-	$	1,176,454

Our senior management places considerable emphasis on the early identification of problem assets, problem-resolution and minimizing loss exposure. Delinquency notices are mailed monthly to all delinquent borrowers, advising them of the amount of their delinquency. When a loan becomes more than 30 days delinquent, we send a letter advising the borrower of the delinquency. Residential and consumer lending borrowers are typically given 30 days to pay the delinquent payments or to contact us to make arrangements to bring the loan current over a longer period of time. Generally, if a residential or consumer lending borrower fails to bring the loan current within 90 days from the original due date or to make arrangements to cure the delinquency over a longer period of time, the matter is referred to legal counsel and foreclosure or other collection proceedings are initiated. We may consider forbearance or a loan restructuring in certain circumstances where a temporary loss of income is the primary cause of the delinquency, and if a reasonable plan is presented by the borrower to cure the delinquency in a reasonable period of time after his or her income resumes. Problem or delinquent borrowers in our commercial real estate, commercial business and resort portfolios are handled on a case-by-case basis, typically by our special assets department. Appropriate problem-resolution and workout strategies are formulated based on the specific facts and circumstances.

First Connecticut Bancorp, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

Related Party Loans

During the regular course of its business, the Company makes loans to its executive officers, directors and other related parties. These related party loans totaled $539,000 and $831,000 at September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively. All related party loans were performing according to their credit terms.

5.	Credit Arrangements

The Company has access to a pre-approved line of credit with the Federal Home Loan Bank of Boston (“FHLBB”) for $8.8 million, which was undrawn at September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010. As of September 30, 2011, the Company’s access to a pre-approved unsecured line of credit with a bank increased to $20.0 million from $10.0 million at December 31, 2010, which was undrawn at September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010. During 2011, the Company entered into a $3.5 million unsecured line of credit agreement with a bank which expired on October 31, 2011. The Company is currently working with the bank to renew the $3.5 million unsecured line. The Company maintains a balance of $262,500 with the bank to avoid fees associated with the above line. The line was undrawn at September 30, 2011.

During 2010, the Company entered into the Federal Reserve Bank’s discount window loan collateral program that enables the Company to borrow up to $84.6 million on an overnight basis as of September 30, 2011 and was undrawn at September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010. The funding arrangement was collateralized by $120.1 million in pledged commercial real estate loans as of September 30, 2011.

In accordance with an agreement with the FHLBB, the Company is required to maintain qualified collateral, as defined in the FHLBB Statement of Credit Policy, free and clear of liens, pledges and encumbrances, as collateral for the advances, if any, and the preapproved line of credit. The Company is in compliance with these collateral requirements.

FHLBB advances totaled $63.0 million and $71.0 million at September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively. Advances from the FHLBB are collateralized by first mortgage loans with an estimated eligible collateral value of $455.2 million and $439.7 million at September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively. The Company is required to acquire and hold shares of capital stock in the FHLBB in an amount at least equal to the sum of 0.35% of the aggregate principal amount of its unpaid residential mortgage loans and similar obligations at the beginning of each year and up to 4.5% of its advances (borrowings) from the FHLBB. The carrying value of FHLBB stock approximates fair value based on the redemption provisions of the stock.

The Bank has a Master Repurchase Agreement borrowing facility with a broker. Borrowings under the Master Repurchase Agreement are secured by the Company’s investments in certain treasury bill securities with a fair value totaling $25.0 million. Outstanding borrowings totaled $21.0 million at September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010.

The Bank offers overnight repurchase liability agreements to commercial or municipal customers whose excess deposit account balances are swept daily into collateralized repurchase liability accounts. The Bank had repurchase liabilities outstanding of $72.3 million and $84.0 million as of September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively. They are secured by the Company’s investment in specific issues of U.S. Treasury obligations, U.S. Government agency obligations and Government sponsored residential mortgage-backed securities with a market value of $96.6 million and $79.0 million as of September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively.

First Connecticut Bancorp, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

Deposits

Deposits consisted of the following:

	September 30, 2011		December 31, 2010
(Dollars in thousands)
Noninterest-bearing demand deposits	$	176,234	$	150,186
Interest-bearing
NOW accounts		285,768		217,151
Money market		223,791		158,232
Savings accounts		144,144		129,122
Time deposits		411,339		453,677
Club accounts		392		137
Total deposits	$	1,241,668	$	1,108,505

7.	Pension and Other Postretirement Benefit Plans

The following tables set forth the components of net periodic pension and benefit costs.


	Pension Benefits						Other Postretirement Benefits
	Three Months Ended September 30,						Three Months Ended September 30,
	2011			2010			2011			2010
(Dollars in thousands)
Service cost	$	173		$	107		$	15		$	13
Interest cost		265			234			34			34
Expected return on plan assets		(270	)		(264	)		-			-
Amortization:
Loss		96			41			-			-
Transition obligation		-			-			-			-
Prior service cost		(32	)		(32	)		(12	)		(12	)
Net periodic benefit cost	$	232		$	86		$	37		$	35

	Pension Benefits						Other Postretirement Benefits
	Nine Months Ended September 30,						Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2011			2010			2011			2010
(Dollars in thousands)
Service cost	$	517		$	391		$	45		$	39
Interest cost		793			746			102			104
Expected return on plan assets		(808	)		(760	)		-			-
Amortization:
Loss		292			173			-			-
Transition obligation		-			-			-			-
Prior service cost		(94	)		(94	)		(36	)		(36	)
Net periodic benefit cost	$	700		$	456		$	111		$	107

First Connecticut Bancorp, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

The Company has contributed $866,000 as of September 30, 2011 and expects to contribute a total of $1.0 million to the qualified defined benefit plan for the year ended December 31, 2011. Since the supplemental plan and the postretirement benefit plans are unfunded, the expected employer contributions for the year ending December 31, 2011 will be equal to the Company’s estimated future benefit payment liabilities totaling approximately $331,000 less any participant contributions.

As part of the reorganization, the Company established the ESOP to provide eligible employees the opportunity to own Company stock. The Company provided a loan to the Farmington Bank Employee Stock Ownership Plan Trust in the amount needed to purchase up to 1,430,416 shares of the Company’s common stock in the open market subsequent to the initial public offering. The loan bears an interest rate equal to the Wall Street Journal Prime Rate plus one percentage point, adjusted annually, and provides for annual payments of interest and principal over the 15 year term of the loan. At September 30, 2011, the loan had an outstanding balance of $9.7 million and an interest rate of 4.25%. The Bank has committed to make contributions to the ESOP sufficient to support the debt service of the loan. The loan is secured by the unallocated shares purchased. The ESOP compensation expense for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011 was $522,000 and $533,000, respectively.

Shares held by the ESOP include the following as of September 30, 2011:

Allocated			-
Committed to be released			48,193
Unallocated			835,161
			883,354

The fair value of unallocated ESOP shares was $9.4 million at September 30, 2011.

8.	Derivative Financial Instruments

Non-Hedge Accounting Derivatives/Non-designated Hedges:

The Company does not use derivatives for trading or speculative purposes. Interest rate swap derivatives not designated as hedges are offered to certain qualifying commercial customers and to manage the Company’s exposure to interest rate movements but do not meet the strict hedge accounting under FASB ASC 815, “Derivatives and Hedging”. The interest rate swap agreements enable these customers to synthetically fix the interest rate on variable interest rate loans. The customers pay a variable rate and enter into a fixed rate swap agreement with the Company. The credit risk associated with the interest rate swap derivatives executed with these customers is essentially the same as that involved in extending loans and is subject to our normal credit policies. The Company obtains collateral, if needed, based upon its assessment of the customers’ credit quality. Generally, interest rate swap agreements are offered to “pass” rated customers requesting long-term commercial loans or commercial mortgages in amounts of at least $1.0 million. The interest rate swap agreement with our customers is cross-collateralized by the loan collateral. The interest rate swap agreements do not have any embedded interest rate caps or floors.

For every variable interest rate swap agreement entered into with a commercial customer, the Company simultaneously enters into a fixed rate interest rate swap agreement with a correspondent bank, PNC Bank, agreeing to pay a fixed income stream and receive a variable interest rate swap. The Company is required to collateralize the fair value of its derivative liability. As of September 30, 2011, the Company maintained a cash balance of $7.2 million with PNC Bank and pledged a mortgage backed security with a fair value of $222,000 to collateralize our position. The Company’s agreement with PNC Bank will require PNC Bank to collateralize their position at an agreed upon threshold based upon their investor rating at the time should the Company’s liability to them ever become a receivable. As of September 30, 2011, the Company’s agreement would require PNC Bank to secure any outstanding receivable in excess of $10.0 million.

First Connecticut Bancorp, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

Credit-risk-related Contingent Features

The Company’s agreement with PNC Bank, its derivative counterparty, contains the following provisions:

●

If the Company defaults on any of its indebtedness, including default where repayment of the indebtedness has not been accelerated by the lender, then the Company could also be declared in default on its derivative obligations;

●

If the Company fails to maintain its status as a well/adequately capitalized institution, then the counterparty could terminate the derivative positions, and the Company would be required to settle its obligations under the agreements;

●

if the Company fails to maintain a specified minimum leverage ratio, then the Company could be declared in default on its derivative obligations; and

●

if a specified event or condition occurs that materially changes the Company’s creditworthiness in an adverse manner, it may be required to fully collateralize its obligations under the derivative instrument.

The Company is in compliance with the above provisions as of September 30, 2011.

The Company has established a derivative policy which sets forth the parameters for such transactions (including underwriting guidelines, rate setting process, maximum maturity, approval and documentation requirements), as well as identifies internal controls for the management of risks related to these hedging activities (such as approval of counterparties, limits on counterparty credit risk, maximum loan amounts, and limits to single dealer counterparties).

The interest rate swap derivatives executed with our customers and our counterparty, PNC Bank, are marked to market and are included with prepaid expenses and other assets and accrued expenses and other liabilities on our consolidated statements of condition at fair value. The Company had the following outstanding interest rate swaps that were not designated for hedge accounting:

				September 30, 2011							December 31, 2010
	Consolidated Balance Sheet Location	# of Instruments		Notional Amount		Estimated Fair Values			# of Instruments		Notional Amount		Estimated Fair Values
(Dollars in thousands)

Commercial loan customer interest rate swap position	Other Assets		26	$	81,105	$	6,088			9	$	42,289	$	1,771

Commercial loan customer interest rate swap position	Other Liabilities		-		-		-			10		44,779		(1,497	)

Counterparty interest rate swap position	Other Liabilities		26		81,105		(6,088	)		19		87,068		(274	)

First Connecticut Bancorp, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

The Company recorded the changes in the fair value of non-hedge accounting derivatives as a component of other noninterest income except for interest received and paid which is reported in interest income in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations as follows:


	Three Months Ended September 30,
	2011								2010

	Interest Income Recorded in Interest Income			MTM (Loss) Gain Recorded in Noninterest Income		Net Impact			Interest Income Recorded in Interest Income			MTM (Loss) Gain Recorded in Noninterest Income		Net Impact
(Dollars in thousands)

Commercial loan customer interest rate swap position	$	525		$	-	$	525		$	396		$	-	$	396

Counterparty interest rate swap position		(525	)		-		(525	)		(396	)		-		(396	)

Total	$	-		$	-	$	-		$	-		$	-	$	-

	Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2011								2010

	Interest Income Recorded in Interest Income			MTM (Loss) Gain Recorded in Noninterest Income		Net Impact			Interest Income Recorded in Interest Income			MTM (Loss) Gain Recorded in Noninterest Income		Net Impact
(Dollars in thousands)

Commercial loan customer interest rate swap position	$	1,601		$	-	$	1,601		$	985		$	-	$	985

Counterparty interest rate swap position		(1,601	)		-		(1,601	)		(985	)		-		(985	)

Total	$	-		$	-	$	-		$	-		$	-	$	-

Mortgage Banking Derivatives

Certain derivative instruments, primarily forward sales of mortgage loans and mortgage-backed securities (“MBS”) are utilized by the Company in its efforts to manage risk of loss associated with its mortgage loan commitments and mortgage loans held for sale. Prior to closing and funding certain single-family residential mortgage loans, an interest-rate lock commitment is generally extended to the borrower. During the period from commitment date to closing date, the Company is subject to the risk that market rates of interest may change. If market rates rise, investors generally will pay less to purchase such loans resulting in a reduction in the gain on sale of the loans or, possibly, a loss. In an effort to mitigate such risk, forward delivery sales commitments, under which the Company agrees to deliver whole mortgage loans to various investors or issue MBS, are established. At September 30, 2011, outstanding rate locks totaled approximately $2.5 million and outstanding commitments to sell residential mortgage loans totaled approximately $2.5 million. Forward sales, which include mandatory forward commitments of approximately $200,000 at September 30, 2011, establish the price to be received upon the sale of the related mortgage loan, thereby mitigating certain interest rate risk. There is, however, still certain execution risk specifically related to the Company’s ability to close and deliver to its investors the mortgage loans it has committed to sell.

First Connecticut Bancorp, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

9.	Financial Instruments with Off-Balance Sheet Risk

The Company is a party to financial instruments with off-balance sheet risk in the normal course of business to meet the financing needs of its customers. These financial instruments include commitments to extend credit and unused lines of credit. Those instruments involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit and interest rate risk in excess of the amount recognized in the consolidated statement of condition. The contract amounts of those instruments reflect the extent of involvement the Company has in particular classes of financial instruments.

The Company’s exposure to credit loss in the event of nonperformance by the other party to the financial instrument for commitments to extend credit is represented by the contractual amount of those instruments. The Company uses the same credit policies in making commitments and conditional obligations as it does for on-balance sheet instruments. Financial instruments whose contract amounts represent credit risk are as follows:

	September 30,		December 31,
	2011		2010
(Dollars in thousands)
Approved loan commitments	$	51,683	$	26,409
Approved resort commitments		-		19,000
Unadvanced portion of construction loans		19,222		20,290
Unadvanced portion of resort loans		13,826		23,602
Unused lines for home equity loans		97,611		80,410
Unused revolving lines of credit		362		355
Unused commercial letters of credit		15,752		9,885
Unused commercial lines of credit		92,717		54,048
	$	291,173	$	233,999

Financial instruments with off-balance sheet risk had a valuation allowance of $276,000 and $242,000 as of September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively.

Commitments to extend credit are agreements to lend to a customer as long as there is no violation of any condition established in the contract. Commitments generally have fixed expiration dates or other termination clauses and may require payment of a fee. Since many of the commitments are expected to expire without being drawn upon, the total commitment amounts do not necessarily represent future cash requirements. The Company evaluates each customer’s creditworthiness on a case-by-case basis. The amount of collateral obtained if deemed necessary by the Company upon extension of credit is based on management’s credit evaluation of the counterparty. Collateral held is primarily residential property.

At September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the Company had no off-balance sheet special purpose entities and participated in no securitizations of assets.

First Connecticut Bancorp, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

10.	Fair Value Measurements

Fair value estimates are made as of a specific point in time based on the characteristics of the financial instruments and relevant market information. In accordance with FASB ASC 820-10, the fair value estimates are measured within the fair value hierarchy. The hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1 measurements) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3 measurements). The three levels of the fair value hierarchy under FASB ASC 820-10 are described as follows:

Basis of Fair Value Measurement

●

Level 1 - Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets that are accessible at the measurement date for identical, unrestricted assets or liabilities;

●

Level 2 - Quoted prices in markets that are not active, or inputs that are observable either directly or indirectly, for substantially the full term of the asset or liability;

●

Level 3 - Prices or valuation techniques that require inputs that are both significant to the fair value measurement and unobservable (i.e., supported by little or no market activity).

When available, quoted market prices are used. In other cases, fair values are based on estimates using present value or other valuation techniques. These techniques involve uncertainties and are significantly affected by the assumptions used and judgments made regarding risk characteristics of various financial instruments, discount rates, and estimates of future cash flows, future expected loss experience and other factors. Changes in assumptions could significantly affect these estimates. Derived fair value estimates cannot be substantiated by comparison to independent markets and, in certain cases, could not be realized in an immediate sale of the instrument.

Fair value estimates are based on existing financial instruments without attempting to estimate the value of anticipated future business and the value of assets and liabilities that are not financial instruments. Accordingly, the aggregate fair value amounts presented do not purport to represent the underlying market value of the Company. There are no transfers between levels during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011 or during the year ended December 31, 2010.

First Connecticut Bancorp, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis

The following table details the financial instruments carried at fair value on a recurring basis as of September 30, 2011 and indicates the fair value hierarchy of the valuation techniques utilized by the Company to determine the fair value:

	September 30, 2011
(Dollars in thousands)	Total		Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
Assets
U.S. Treasury obligations	$	130,998	$	130,998	$	-	$	-
Government sponsored residential mortgage-backed securities		23,096		-		23,096		-
Corporate debt securities		1,115		-		1,115		-
Trust preferred debt securities		42		-		-		42
Preferred equity securities		1,705		-		1,705		-
Marketable equity securities		353		113		240		-
Mutual funds		3,434		-		3,434		-
Securities available-for-sale		160,743		131,111		29,590		42
Interest rate swap derivative		6,088		-		6,088		-
Total	$	166,831	$	131,111	$	35,678	$	42

Liabilities
Interest rate swap derivative	$	6,088	$	-	$	6,088	$	-
Forward loan sales commitments		8		-		-		8
Derivative loan commitments		66		-		-		66
Total	$	6,162	$	-	$	6,088	$	74

First Connecticut Bancorp, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

The following table details the financial instruments carried at fair value on a recurring basis as of December 31, 2010 and indicates the fair value hierarchy of the valuation techniques utilized by the Company to determine the fair value:

	December 31, 2010
(Dollars in thousands)	Total		Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
Assets
U.S. Treasury obligations	$	112,975	$	112,975	$	-	$	-
U.S. Goverment agency obligations		11,080		-		11,080		-
Government sponsored residential mortgage-backed securities		32,294		-		32,294		-
Corporate debt securities		1,052		-		1,052		-
Trust preferred debt securities		44		-		-		44
Preferred equity securities		1,860		-		1,860		-
Marketable equity securities		406		116		290		-
Mutual funds		3,297		-		3,297		-
Securities available for sale		163,008		113,091		49,873		44
Interest rate swap derivative		1,771		-		1,771		-
Total	$	164,779	$	113,091	$	51,644	$	44

Liabilities
Interest rate swap derivative	$	1,771	$	-	$	1,771	$	-
Total	$	1,771	$	-	$	1,771	$	-

The following tables present additional information about assets measured at fair value for which the Company has utilized Level 3 inputs.

	Securities Available-for-Sale					Derivative and Forward Loan Sales Commitments, Net
	For the Three Months Ended September 30,					For the Three Months Ended September 30,
	2011			2010		2011		2010

(Dollars in thousands)
Balance at beginning of period	$	44		$	67	$	21	$	-
Transfer into Level 3		-			-		-		-
Accretion		-			-		-		-
Paydowns		(2	)		-		-		-
Total losses (gains) - (realized/unrealized):
Included in earnings		-			-		53		-
Included in other comprehensive income		-			-		-		-
Purchases		-			-		-		-
Sales/Proceeds		-			-		-		-
Balance at the end of period	$	42		$	67	$	74	$	-

First Connecticut Bancorp, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

	Securities Available-for-Sale						Derivative and Forward Loan Sales Commitments, Net
	For the Nine Months Ended September 30,						For the Nine Months Ended September 30,
		2011			2010			2011		2010

(Dollars in thousands)
Balance at beginning of period	$	44		$	90		$	-	$	-
Transfer into Level 3		-			-			-		-
Accretion		-			-			-		-
Paydowns		(2	)		(23	)		-		-
Total losses - (realized/unrealized):
Included in earnings		-			-			74		-
Included in other comprehensive income		-			-			-		-
Purchases		-			-			-		-
Sales/Proceeds		-			-			-		-
Balance at the end of period	$	42		$	67		$	74	$	-

The following is a description of the valuation methodologies used for instruments measured at fair value:

Securities Available for Sale: Investment securities available for sale are recorded at fair value on a recurring basis. Fair value measurement is based upon quoted prices, if available. If quoted prices are not available, fair values are measured using independent pricing models. Level 1 securities are those traded on active markets for identical securities including U.S. treasury obligations and, marketable equity securities. Level 2 securities include U.S. government agency obligations, government-sponsored residential mortgage-backed securities, corporate debt securities, preferred equity securities and mutual funds. When a market is illiquid or there is a lack of transparency around the inputs to valuation, the respective securities are classified as level 3 and reliance is placed upon internally developed models and management judgment and evaluation for valuation. Level 3 securities include trust preferred debt securities. At September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the Company did not use the pricing service for its Level 3 securities, which consisted of pooled trust preferred debt securities. Therefore, management obtained a price by using a discounted cash flows analysis and a market bid indication.

The Company utilizes a third party, nationally-recognized pricing service (“pricing service”), subject to review by management, to estimate fair value measurements for almost 100% of its investment securities portfolio. The pricing service evaluates each asset class based on relevant market information considering observable data that may include dealer quotes, reported trades, market spreads, cash flows, the U.S. Treasury yield curve, the LIBOR swap yield curve, trade execution data, market prepayment speeds, credit information and the bond’s terms and conditions, among other things. The fair value prices on all investment securities are reviewed for reasonableness by management. Also, management assessed the valuation techniques used by the pricing service based on a review of their pricing methodology to ensure proper hierarchy classifications.

Interest Rate Swap Derivative Receivable and Liability: The Company’s derivative positions are valued using proprietary models that use as their basis readily observable market parameters and are classified within Level 2 of the valuation hierarchy. Such derivatives are basic interest rate swaps that do not have any embedded interest rate caps and floors.

First Connecticut Bancorp, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

Forward loan sale commitments and derivative loan commitments: Forward loan sale commitments and derivative loan commitments are based on fair values of the underlying mortgage loans and the probability of such commitments being exercised. Significant management judgment and estimation is required in determining these fair value measurements. Derivatives that are valued based upon models with significant unobservable market parameters and that are normally traded less actively or have trade activity that is one way are classified within Level 3 of the valuation hierarchy.

Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Nonrecurring Basis

Certain assets and liabilities are measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. These include assets that are measured at the lower of cost or market that were recognized at fair value below cost at the end of the period as well as assets that are not measured at fair value on an ongoing basis but are subject to fair value adjustments in certain circumstances, such as when there is evidence of impairment.

The following table details the financial instruments carried at fair value on a nonrecurring basis at September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 and indicates the fair value hierarchy of the valuation techniques utilized by the Company to determine the fair value:

	September 30, 2011
	Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
(Dollars in thousands)
Mortgage servicing rights	$	-	$	-	$	558
Loans held for sale		-		778		-
Impaired loans		-		-		38,627
Other real estate owned		-		-		242

	December 31, 2010
	Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
(Dollars in thousands)
Mortgage servicing rights	$	-	$	-	$	457
Loans held for sale		-		862		-
Impaired loans		-		-		25,466
Other real estate owned		-		-		238

First Connecticut Bancorp, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

The following is a description of the valuation methodologies used for instruments measured at fair value:

Mortgage Servicing Rights: A mortgage servicing right asset represents the amount by which the present value of the estimated future net cash flows to be received from servicing loans are expected to more than adequately compensate the Company for performing the servicing. The fair value of servicing rights is estimated using a present value cash flow model. The most important assumptions used in the valuation model are the anticipated rate of the loan prepayments and discount rates. Adjustments are only recorded when the discounted cash flows derived from the valuation model are less than the carrying value of the asset. As such, measurement at fair value is on a nonrecurring basis. Although some assumptions in determining fair value are based on standards used by market participants, some are based on unobservable inputs and therefore are classified in Level 3 of the valuation hierarchy.

Loans Held for Sale: Loans held for sale are accounted for at the lower of cost or market. The fair value of loans held for sale are based on quoted market prices of similar loans sold in conjunction with securitization transactions, adjusted as required for changes in loan characteristics.

Impaired Loans: Loans are generally not recorded at fair value on a recurring basis. Periodically, the Company records nonrecurring adjustments to the carrying value of loans based on fair value measurements for partial charge-offs of the uncollectible portions of those loans. Nonrecurring adjustments also include certain impairment amounts for collateral-dependent loans calculated in accordance with FASB ASC 310-10 when establishing the allowance for credit losses. Such amounts are generally based on the fair value of the underlying collateral supporting the loan. Collateral is typically valued using appraisals or other indications of value based on recent comparable sales of similar properties or other assumptions. Estimates of fair value based on collateral are generally based on assumptions not observable in the marketplace and therefore such valuations have been classified as Level 3. Any impaired loan for which no specific valuation allowance was necessary at September 30, 2011 is the result of either sufficient cash flow or sufficient collateral coverage, or previous charge off amount that reduced the book value of the loan to an amount equal to or below the fair value of the collateral. Impaired loans are measured based on either collateral values supported by appraisals, observed market prices or where potential losses have been identified and reserved accordingly. Updated appraisals are obtained at least annually for impaired loans $250,000 or greater. Management performs a quarterly review of the valuation of impaired loans and considers the current market and collateral conditions for collateral dependent loans when estimating their fair value for purposes of determining whether an allowance for loan losses is necessary for impaired loans. When assessing the collateral coverage for an impaired loan, management discounts appraisals based upon the age of the appraisal, anticipated selling charges and any other costs needed to prepare the collateral for sale to determine its net realizable value.

Other Real Estate Owned: The Company classifies property acquired through foreclosure or acceptance of deed-in-lieu of foreclosure as other real estate owned in its financial statements. Upon foreclosure, the property securing the loan is written down to fair value less selling costs. The writedown is based upon the difference between the appraised value and the book value. Appraisals are based on observable market data such as comparable sales within the real estate market, however assumptions made in determining comparability are unobservable and therefore these assets are classified as Level 3 within the valuation hierarchy.

First Connecticut Bancorp, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

11.	Fair Value of Financial Instruments

FASB ASC 825-10, Fair Value of Financial Instruments, requires disclosure of fair value information about financial instruments, whether or not recognized in the consolidated statements of condition, for which it is practicable to estimate that value. In cases where quoted market prices are not available, fair values are based on estimates using present value or other valuation techniques. Those techniques are significantly affected by the assumptions used, including the discount rate and estimates of future cash flows. In that regard, the derived fair value estimates cannot be substantiated by comparison to independent markets and, in many cases, could not be realized in immediate settlement of the instrument. FASB ASC 825-10 excludes certain financial instruments and all nonfinancial instruments from its disclosure requirements. Accordingly, the aggregate fair value amounts presented do not represent the underlying value of the Company.

The following methods and assumptions were used by the Company in estimating its fair value disclosure for financial instruments:

Cash and cash equivalents: The carrying amounts reported in the statement of condition for cash and cash equivalents approximate those assets’ fair values.

Investment securities: Fair values for investment securities are based on quoted market prices, where available. If quoted market prices are not available, fair values are based on quoted market prices of comparable instruments.

Investment in Federal Home Loan Bank of Boston stock: The fair value of stock in the Federal Home Loan Bank of Boston is assumed to approximate its cost.

Loans: In general, discount rates used to calculate values for loan products were based on the Company’s pricing at the respective year end and included appropriate adjustments for expected credit losses. A higher discount rate was assumed with respect to estimated cash flows associated with nonaccrual loans. Projected loan cash flows were adjusted for estimated credit losses. However, such estimates made by the Company may not be indicative of assumptions and adjustments that a purchaser of the Company’s loans would seek.

Accrued interest: The carrying amount of accrued interest approximates its fair value.

Interest Rate Swap Derivative Receivable: Interest rate swap derivatives not designated as hedges are measured at fair value.

Forward Loan Sale Commitments: Forward loan sale commitments derivatives not designated as hedges are measured at fair value.

Deposits: The fair values disclosed for demand deposits and savings accounts (e.g., interest and noninterest checking and passbook savings) are, by definition, equal to the amount payable on demand at the reporting date (i.e., their carrying amounts). The carrying amounts for variable-rate, fixed-term certificates of deposit approximate their fair values at the reporting date. Fair values for fixed-rate certificates of deposit are estimated using a discounted cash flow calculation that applies interest rates currently being offered on certificates to a schedule of aggregate expected monthly maturities of time deposits.

Borrowed funds: The fair value for borrowed funds are estimated using discounted cash flow analysis based on the Company’s current incremental borrowing rate for similar types of agreements.

First Connecticut Bancorp, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

Repurchase liability: Repurchase liabilities represent a short-term customer sweep account product. Because of the short-term nature of these liabilities, the carrying amount approximates its fair value.

Interest Rate Swap Derivative Liability: Interest rate swap derivatives not designated as hedges are measured at fair value.

Derivative Loan Commitments: Interest rate lock commitments not designated as hedges are measured at fair value.

ASC 825-10 defines the fair value of demand deposits as the amount payable on demand and prohibits adjusting fair value for any value derived from retaining those deposits for an expected future period of time. That component is commonly referred to as a deposit base intangible. This intangible asset is neither considered in the above fair value amounts nor is it recorded as an intangible asset in the consolidated statements of condition.

First Connecticut Bancorp, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

The following table presents a comparison of the carrying value and estimated fair value of the Company’s financial instruments at September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010:

	September 30, 2011				December 31, 2010
			Estimated				Estimated
	Carrying		Fair		Carrying		Fair
	Amount		Value		Amount		Value
(Dollars in thousands)
Financial assets
Cash and due from banks	$	37,554	$	37,554	$	18,608	$	18,608
Federal funds sold		203,000		203,000		-		-
Securities held-to-maturity		3,621		3,621		3,672		3,672
Securities available-for-sale		160,743		160,743		163,008		163,008
Loans held for sale		778		778		862		862
Loans		1,225,305		1,249,915		1,176,454		1,179,012
Federal Home Loan Bank stock		7,449		7,449		7,449		7,449
Accrued interest receivable		3,837		3,837		4,227		4,227

Financial liabilities
Deposits
Noninterest-bearing demand deposits		176,234		176,234		150,186		150,186
Savings accounts		144,144		144,144		129,122		129,122
Money market		223,791		223,791		158,232		158,232
Time deposits		411,339		414,372		453,677		456,147
NOW accounts		285,768		285,768		217,151		217,151
Club accounts		392		392		137		137
FHLB advances		63,000		66,026		71,000		72,779
Repurchase agreement borrowings		21,000		22,875		21,000		20,939
Mortgagors’ escrow accounts		6,568		6,568		9,717		9,717
Repurchase liabilities		72,278		72,278		84,029		84,029

On-balance sheet derivative financial instruments
Forward loan sales commitments:
Assets		-		-		-		-
Liabilities		8		8		-		-
Interest rate swap derivative liability:
Assets		6,088		6,088		1,771		1,771
Liabilities		6,088		6,088		1,771		1,771
Derivative loan commitments
Assets		-		-		-		-
Liabilities		66		66		-		-

First Connecticut Bancorp, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

12.	Regulatory Matters

Capital guidelines of the Federal Reserve Board and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) require the Company and the Bank to maintain certain minimum ratios, as set forth below. At September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the Company and the Bank were deemed to be “well capitalized” under the regulations of the Federal Reserve Board and the FDIC, respectively, and in compliance with the applicable capital requirements.

The following table presents the actual capital amounts and ratios for the Company and the Bank:

	Actual					Minimum Required for Capital Adequacy Purposes					To Be Well Capitalized Under Prompt Corrective Action
(Dollars in thousands)	Amount		Ratio			Amount		Ratio				Amount		Ratio

Farmington Bank:
At September 30, 2011 -
Total Capital (to Risk Weighted Assets)	$	197,139		17.43	%	$	90,483		8.00	%		$	113,103		10.00	%
Tier I Capital (to Risk Weighted Assets)		182,992		16.18			45,239		4.00				67,859		6.00
Tier I Capital (to Average Assets)		182,992		10.75			68,090		4.00				85,113		5.00
At December 31, 2010 -
Total Capital (to Risk Weighted Assets)	$	110,772		10.27	%	$	86,309		8.00	%		$	107,886		10.00	%
Tier I Capital (to Risk Weighted Assets)		97,194		9.01			43,155		4.00				64,732		6.00
Tier I Capital (to Average Assets)		97,194		6.47			60,078		4.00				75,097		5.00
First Connecticut Bancorp, Inc.:
At September 30, 2011 -
Total Capital (to Risk Weighted Assets)	$	274,471		24.21	%	$	90,697		8.00	%		$	113,371		10.00	%
Tier I Capital (to Risk Weighted Assets)		260,324		22.96			45,353		4.00				68,029		6.00
Tier I Capital (to Average Assets)		260,324		15.55			66,964		4.00				83,705		5.00
At December 31, 2010 -
Total Capital (to Risk Weighted Assets)	$	110,872		10.28	%	$	86,309		8.00	%		$	107,886		10.00	%
Tier I Capital (to Risk Weighted Assets)		97,294		9.02			43,155		4.00				64,732		6.00
Tier I Capital (to Average Assets)		97,294		6.48			60,097		4.00				75,121		5.00

First Connecticut Bancorp, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

13.	Other Comprehensive Income

The following table represents the components of comprehensive income and other comprehensive income for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010:

	Three Months Ended September 30,						Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2011			2010			2011			2010
(Dollars in thousands)
Net income (loss)	$	1,043		$	1,394		$	(2,586	)	$	5,014
Other comprehensive (loss) income, before tax
Unrealized gains (losses) on securities:
Unrealized holding losses arising during the period		(632	)		(2,101	)		(603	)		(2,198	)
Less: reclassification adjustment for gains included in net income (loss)		89			965			89			965
Net change in unrealized losses		(543	)		(1,136	)		(514	)		(1,233	)
Change related to employee benefit plans		55			13			162			43
Other comprehensive loss, before tax		(488	)		(1,123	)		(352	)		(1,190	)
Income tax benefit		(165	)		(382	)		(119	)		(405	)
Other comprehensive loss, net of tax		(323	)		(741	)		(233	)		(785	)

Comprehensive income (loss)	$	720		$	653		$	(2,819	)	$	4,229

14.	Legal Actions

The Company and its subsidiaries are involved in various legal proceedings which have arisen in the normal course of business. The Company believes there are no pending actions that will have a material adverse effect on the consolidated financial statements.

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Forward-Looking Statements

This Form 10-Q contains “forward-looking statements.” You can identify these forward-looking statements through our use of words such as “may,” “will,” “anticipate,” “assume,” “should,” “indicate,” “would,” “believe,” “contemplate,” “expect,” “estimate,” “continue,” “plan,” “project,” “could,” “intend,” “target” and other similar words and expressions of the future. These forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to:

●	statements of our goals, intentions and expectations;

●	statements regarding our business plans, prospects, growth and operating strategies;

●	statements regarding the asset quality of our loan and investment portfolios; and

●	estimates of our risks and future costs and benefits.

These forward-looking statements are based on current beliefs and expectations of our management and are inherently subject to significant business, economic and competitive uncertainties and contingencies, many of which are beyond our control. In addition, these forward-looking statements are subject to assumptions with respect to future business strategies and decisions that are subject to change.

The following factors, among others, could cause actual results to differ materially from the anticipated results or other expectations expressed in the forward-looking statements:

●	Local, regional and national business or economic conditions may differ from those expected.

●	The effects of and changes in trade, monetary and fiscal policies and laws, including the U.S. Federal Reserve Board’s interest rate policies, may adversely affect our business.

●	The ability to increase market share and control expenses may be more difficult than anticipated.

●	Changes in laws and regulatory requirements (including those concerning taxes, banking, securities and insurance) may adversely affect us or our business.

●	Changes in accounting policies and practices, as may be adopted by regulatory agencies, the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board or the Financial Accounting Standards Board, may affect expected financial reporting.

●	Future changes in interest rates may reduce our profits which could have a negative impact on the value of our stock.

●	We are subject to lending risk and could incur losses in our loan portfolio despite our underwriting practices. Changes in real estate values could also increase our lending risk.

●	Changes in demand for loan products, financial products and deposit flow could impact our financial performance.

●	Strong competition within our market area may limit our growth and profitability.

●	We may not manage the risks involved in the foregoing as well as anticipated.

●	If our allowance for loan losses is not sufficient to cover actual loan losses, our earnings could decrease.

●

Our stock value may be negatively affected by federal regulations and articles of incorporation provisions restricting takeovers.

●

Implementation of stock benefit plans will increase our costs, which will reduce our income.

●

The Dodd-Frank Act was signed into law on July 21, 2010 and is expected to result in dramatic regulatory changes that will affect the industry in general, and impact our competitive position in ways that can’t be predicted at this time.

●

The Emergency Economic Stabilization Act (“EESA”) of 2008 has and may continue to have a significant impact on the banking industry.

Any forward-looking statements made by or on behalf of us in this Form 10-Q speak only as of the date of this Form 10-Q. We do not undertake to update forward-looking statements to reflect the impact of circumstances or events that arise after the date the forward-looking statement was made. The reader should, however, consult any further disclosures of a forward-looking nature we may make in future filings. The Company wishes to advise readers that the factors listed above could affect the Company’s financial performance and could cause the Company’s actual results for future periods to differ materially from any opinions or statements expressed with respect to future periods in any current statements.

General

Established in 1851, Farmington Bank is a full-service, community bank with 16 full service branch offices and 4 limited services offices, including our main office, located throughout Hartford County, Connecticut. Farmington Bank is expecting to open its 17th full service branch in Wethersfield, Connecticut during the fourth quarter of 2011. Farmington Bank provides a diverse range of commercial and consumer services to businesses, individuals and governments across Central Connecticut.

Our Business Strategy

Our business strategy is to operate as a well-capitalized and profitable community bank for businesses, individuals and governments. Our branch franchise extends throughout Hartford County with lending throughout the State of Connecticut. The key elements of our operating strategy include:

●

maintaining a strong capital position in excess of the well-capitalized standards set by our banking regulators to support our current operations and future growth;

●

increasing our focus on commercial lending and continuing to expand commercial banking operations;

●

continuing to focus on consumer and residential lending;

●

maintaining asset quality and prudent lending standards;

●

expanding our existing products and services and developing new products and services to meet the changing needs of consumers and businesses in our market area;

●

continuing expansion through de novo branching with a current goal of adding two to three de novo branches each year for so long as the deposit and loan generating environment continues to be favorable;

●

taking advantage of acquisition opportunities that are consistent with our strategic growth plans; and

●

continuing our efforts to control non-interest expenses.

Critical Accounting Policies

The accounting policies followed by us conform with the accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Critical accounting policies are defined as those that are reflective of significant judgments and uncertainties, and could potentially result in materially different results under different assumptions and conditions. We believe that our most critical accounting policies, which involve the most complex subjective decisions or assessments, relate to allowance for loan losses, other-than-temporary impairment of investment securities, income taxes, pension and other post-retirement benefits. The following is a description of our critical accounting policies and an explanation of the methods and assumptions underlying their application.

Allowance for Loan Losses: The allowance for loan losses is maintained at a level believed adequate by management to absorb potential losses inherent in the loan portfolio as of the statement of condition date. The allowance for loan losses consists of a formula allowance following FASB ASC 450 – Contingencies and FASB ASC 310 – Receivables. The allowance for loan losses is established as losses are estimated to have occurred through a provision for loan losses charged to earnings. Loan losses are charged against the allowance when management believes the uncollectibility of a loan balance is confirmed. Subsequent recoveries, if any, are credited to the allowance.

The allowance for loan losses is evaluated on a regular basis by management. This evaluation is inherently subjective as it requires estimates that are susceptible to significant revision as more information becomes available. The allowance consists of general, allocated and unallocated components, as further described below.

General component: The general component of the allowance for loan losses is based on historical loss experience adjusted for qualitative factors stratified by the following loan segments: residential real estate, commercial real estate, construction, installment, commercial, collateral, home equity line of credit, demand, revolving credit and resort. Construction includes classes for commercial real estate construction and residential development, commercial real estate, construction, commercial and consumer. Management uses a rolling average of historical losses based on a time frame appropriate to capture relevant loss data for each loan segment. This historical loss factor is adjusted for the following qualitative factors: levels/trends in delinquencies; trends in volume and terms of loans; effects of changes in risk selection and underwriting standards and other changes in lending policies, procedures and practices; experience/ability/depth of lending management and staff; and national and local economic trends and conditions. There were no material changes in the Company’s policies or methodology pertaining to the general component of the allowance for loan losses during the nine months ended September 30, 2011.

The qualitative factors are determined based on the various risk characteristics of each loan segment. Risk characteristics relevant to each portfolio segment are as follows:

Residential real estate –residential real estate loans are generally originated in amounts up to 95.0% of the lesser of the appraised value or purchase price of the property, with private mortgage insurance required on loans with a loan-to-value ratio in excess of 80.0%. The Company generally does not grant subprime loans. All loans in this segment are collateralized by owner-occupied residential real estate and repayment is dependent on the credit quality of the individual borrower. Typically, all fixed-rate residential mortgage loans are underwritten pursuant to secondary market underwriting guidelines which include minimum FICO standards. The overall health of the economy, including unemployment rates and housing prices, will have an effect on the credit quality in this segment.

Commercial real estate – Loans in this segment are primarily income-producing properties throughout New England. The underlying cash flows generated by the properties are adversely impacted by a downturn in the economy as evidenced by increased vacancy rates, which in turn, will have an effect on the credit quality in this segment. Management obtains financial information annually and continually monitors the cash flows of these loans.

Construction loans – Loans in this segment include commercial construction loans, real estate subdivision development loans to developers, licensed contractors and builders for the construction and development of commercial real estate projects and residential properties. Construction lending contains a unique risk characteristic as loans are originated under market and economic conditions that may change between the time of origination and the completion and subsequent purchaser financing of the property. In addition, construction subdivision loans and commercial and residential construction loans to contractors and developers entail additional risks as compared to single-family residential mortgage lending to owner-occupants. These loans typically involve large loan balances concentrated in single borrowers or groups of related borrowers. Real estate subdivision development loans to developers, licensed contractors and builders for the construction are generally speculative real estate development loans for which payment is derived from sale of the property. Credit risk is affected by cost overruns, time to sell at an adequate price, and market conditions. Construction financing is generally considered to involve a higher degree of credit risk than longer-term financing on improved, owner-occupied real estate. Residential construction credit quality is impacted by the overall health of the economy, including unemployment rates and housing prices.

Installment, Collateral, Demand and Revolving Credit – Loans in these segments include installment, demand, revolving credit and collateral loans, principally to customers residing in our primary market area with acceptable credit ratings. Our installment and collateral consumer loans generally consist of loans on new and used automobiles, loans collateralized by deposit accounts and unsecured personal loans. The overall health of the economy, including unemployment rates and housing prices, will have an effect on the credit quality in this segment. Excluding collateral loans which are fully collateralized by a deposit account, repayment for loans in these segments are dependent on the credit quality of the individual borrower.

Commercial – Loans in this segment are made to businesses and are generally secured by assets of the business. Repayment is expected from the cash flows of the business. A weakened economy, and resultant decreased consumer spending, will have an effect on the credit quality in this segment.

Home equity line of credit – Loans in this segment include home equity loans and lines of credit generally underwritten with a loan-to-value ratio generally limited to no more than 90%, including any first mortgage. Our home equity lines of credit have ten-year terms and adjustable rates of interest which are indexed to the prime rate. The overall health of the economy, including unemployment rates and housing prices, will have an effect on the credit quality in this segment.

Resort – Loans in this segment include direct receivable, inventory, pre-sale, homeowner association and acquisition & development loans to timeshare developer / operators and participations in timeshare loans originated by experienced timeshare lending institutions, and originates and sells timeshare participations to other lending institutions. Lending to this industry is generally done on a nationwide basis, as the majority of timeshare operators are located outside of the Northeast. The Company currently owns no acquisition & development loans, and a limited amount of inventory loans, homeowner association loans, and pre-sale loans. Receivable loans are typically underwritten utilizing a lending formula in which loan advances are based on a percentage of eligible consumer notes. In addition, these loans generally contain provisions for recourse to the developer, the obligation of the developer to replace defaulted notes, and parameters with respect to minimum FICO scores or average weighted FICO scores of the portfolio of pledged notes. The overall health of the economy, including unemployment rates and housing prices, will have an effect on the credit quality in this segment.

Allocated component: The allocated component relates to loans that are classified as impaired. Impairment is measured on a loan by loan basis for commercial real estate, construction, commercial and resort loans by either the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate or the fair value of the collateral if the loan is collateral dependent. An allowance is established when the discounted cash flows (or collateral value) of the impaired loan is lower than the carrying value of that loan. The Company does not separately identify individual consumer and residential real estate loans for impairment disclosures, unless such loans are subject to a troubled debt restructuring agreement or they are nonaccrual loans with outstanding balances of $500,000 or more. A loan is considered impaired when, based on current information and events, it is probable that the Company will be unable to collect the scheduled payments of principal or interest when due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement. Factors considered by management in determining impairment include payment status, collateral value, and the probability of collecting scheduled principal and interest payments when due. Loans that experience insignificant payment delays and payment shortfalls generally are not classified as impaired. Management determines the significance of payment delays and payment shortfalls on a case-by-case basis, taking into consideration all of the circumstances surrounding the loan and the borrower, including the length of the delay, the reasons for the delay, the borrower’s prior payment record, and the amount of the shortfall in relation to the principal and interest owed. Impairment is measured on a loan-by-loan basis for commercial and construction loans by the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate, the loan’s obtainable market price or the fair value of the collateral if the loan is collateral dependent. Management updates the analysis quarterly. The assumptions used in appraisals are reviewed for appropriateness. Updated appraisals are obtained as needed or adjusted to reflect the estimated decline in the fair value based upon current market conditions for comparable properties.

The Company periodically may agree to modify the contractual terms of loans. When a loan is modified and a concession is made to a borrower experiencing financial difficulty, the modification is considered a troubled debt restructuring (“TDR”). All TDRs are initially classified as impaired.

Unallocated component: An unallocated component is maintained, when needed, to cover uncertainties that could affect management’s estimate of probable losses. The unallocated component of the allowance reflects the margin of imprecision inherent in the underlying assumptions used in the methodologies for estimating allocated and general reserves in the portfolio. The Company’s Loan Policy allows management to utilize a high and low range of 0.0% to 5.0% of our total allowance for loan losses when establishing an unallocated allowance, when considered necessary. The unallocated allowance is used to provide for an unidentified loss that may exist in emerging problem loans that cannot be fully quantified or may be affected by conditions not fully understood as of the balance sheet date.

Beginning in 2007 and continuing in the third quarter of 2011, softening real estate markets and generally weak economic conditions have lead to declines in collateral values and stress on the cash flows of borrowers. These adverse economic conditions could continue placing further stress on the Company’s borrowers and resulting in increases in charge-offs, delinquencies and non-performing loans and lower valuations for the Company’s impaired loans, which could in turn impact significant estimates such as the allowance for loan losses and the effect could be material.

Other-than-Temporary Impairment of Securities: In accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“FASB ASC”) 320-Debt and Equity Securities, a decline in market value of a debt security below amortized cost that is deemed other-than-temporary is charged to earnings for the credit related other-than-temporary impairment (“OTTI”) resulting in the establishment of a new cost basis for the security, while the non-credit related OTTI is recognized in other comprehensive income if there is no intent or requirement to sell the security. Management reviews the securities portfolio on a quarterly basis for the presence of OTTI. An assessment is made as to whether the decline in value results from company-specific events, industry developments, general economic conditions, credit losses on debt or other reasons. After the reasons for the decline are identified, further judgments are required as to whether those conditions are likely to reverse and, if so, whether that reversal is likely to result in a recovery of the fair value of the investment in the near term. If it is judged not to be near-term, a charge is taken which results in a new cost basis. Credit related OTTI for debt securities is recognized in earnings while non-credit related OTTI is recognized in other comprehensive income if there is no intent to sell or will not be required to sell the security. If an equity security is deemed other-than-temporarily impaired, the full impairment is considered to be credit-related and a charge to earnings would be recorded. Management believes the policy for evaluating securities for other-than-temporary impairment is critical because it involves significant judgments by management and could have a material impact on our net income.

Gains and losses on sales of securities are recognized at the time of sale on a specific identification basis. Marketable equity and debt securities are classified as either trading, available-for-sale, or held-to-maturity (applies only to debt securities). Management determines the appropriate classifications of securities at the time of purchase. At September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, we had no debt or equity securities classified as trading. Held-to-maturity securities are debt securities for which we have the ability and intent to hold until maturity. All other securities not included in held-to-maturity are classified as available-for-sale. Held-to-maturity securities are recorded at amortized cost, adjusted for the amortization or accretion of premiums or discounts. Available-for-sale securities are recorded at fair value. Unrealized gains and losses, net of the related tax effect, on available-for-sale securities are excluded from earnings and are reported in accumulated other comprehensive income, a separate component of equity, until realized.

Premiums and discounts on debt securities are amortized or accreted into interest income over the term of the securities using the level yield method.

Income Taxes: Deferred income taxes are provided for differences arising in the timing of income and expenses for financial reporting and for income tax purposes. Deferred income taxes and tax benefits are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax basis. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. We provide a deferred tax asset valuation allowance for the estimated future tax effects attributable to temporary differences and carryforwards when realization is determined not to be more likely than not. We adopted the provisions of FASB ASC 740-10, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes”, on January 1, 2007. FASB ASC 740-10 prescribes a recognition threshold that a tax position is required to meet before being recognized in the financial statements and provides guidance on derecognition, measurement, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure and transition issues. Pursuant to FASB ASC 740-10, we examine our financial statements, our income tax provision and our federal and state income tax returns and analyze our tax positions, including permanent and temporary differences, as well as the major components of income and expense, to determine whether a tax benefit is more likely than not to be sustained upon examination by tax authorities. We recognize interest and penalties arising from income tax settlements as part of our provision for income taxes.

In December 1999, we created and have since maintained a “passive investment company” (“PIC”), as permitted by Connecticut law. At September 30, 2011 there were no material uncertain tax positions related to federal and state income tax matters. We are currently open to audit under the statute of limitations by the Internal Revenue Service and state taxing authorities for the years ended December 31, 2008 through 2010. If the state taxing authority were to determine that the PIC was not in compliance with statutory requirements, a material amount of taxes could be due.

As of September 30, 2011, management believes it is more likely than not that the deferred tax assets will be realized through future reversals of existing taxable temporary differences. As of September 30, 2011, our net deferred tax asset was $13.9 million and there was no valuation allowance.

Pension and Other Post-retirement Benefits: We have a noncontributory defined benefit pension plan that provides benefits for substantially all employees hired before January 1, 2007 who meet certain requirements as to age and length of service. The benefits are based on years of service and average compensation, as defined in the plan. Our funding policy is to contribute annually the maximum amount that could be deducted for federal income tax purposes, while meeting the minimum funding standards established by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974.

In addition to providing pension benefits, we provide certain health care and life insurance benefits for retired employees. Participants or eligible employees hired before January 1, 1993 become eligible for the benefits if they retire after reaching age 62 with fifteen or more years of service. A fixed percent of annual costs are paid depending on length of service at retirement. We accrue for the estimated costs of these other post-retirement benefits through charges to expense during the years that employees render service. We make contributions to cover the current benefits paid under this plan. Management believes the policy for determining pension and other post-retirement benefit expenses is critical because judgments are required with respect to the appropriate discount rate, rate of return on assets, salary increases and other items. Management reviews and updates these assumptions annually. If our estimate of pension and post-retirement expense is too low we may experience higher expenses in the future, reducing our net income. If our estimate is too high, we may experience lower expenses in the future, increasing our net income.

Employee Stock Ownership Plan (“ESOP”): The Company accounts for its ESOP in accordance with FASB ASC 718-40, Compensation – Stock Compensation. Under this guidance, unearned ESOP shares are not considered outstanding and are shown as a reduction of stockholders’ equity as unearned compensation. The Company will recognize compensation cost equal to the fair value of the ESOP shares during the periods in which they are committed to be released. To the extent that the fair value of the Company’s ESOP shares differs from the cost of such shares, this difference will be credited or debited to equity. The Company will receive a tax deduction equal to the cost of the shares released to the extent of the principal paydown on the loan by the ESOP. As the loan is internally leveraged, the loan receivable from the ESOP to the Company is not reported as an asset nor is the debt of the ESOP shown as a liability in the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

Earnings Per Share: Basic earnings per share (“EPS”) excludes dilution and is calculated by dividing net income available to common stockholders by the weighted-average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the period. Diluted EPS is computed in a manner similar to that of basic EPS except that the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding is increased to include the number of incremental common shares (computed using the treasury stock method) that would have been outstanding if all potentially dilutive common shares (such as stock options and unvested restricted stock) were issued during the period. Unallocated common shares held by the ESOP are not included in the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding for either basic or diluted earnings per share calculations.

Comparison of Financial Condition at September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010

Our total assets increased $280.0 million, or 19.8%, to $1.7 billion at September 30, 2011, from $1.4 billion at December 31, 2010, primarily due to a $222.0 million increase in cash and cash equivalents and a $53.6 million increase in loans. Our cash and cash equivalents increased $222.0 million, or 1192.7%, when comparing September 30, 2011 to December 31, 2010 primarily as a result of a $133.2 million increase in deposits and the net proceeds from our June 2011 public offering totaling $167.8 million offset by a $53.6 million increase in loans and a decrease of $19.8 million in our FHLB advances and repurchase liabilities.

Our investment portfolio totaled $164.4 million, or 9.7% of total assets, and $166.7 million, or 11.8% of total assets, respectively, at September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010. Available-for-sale investment securities totaled $160.7 million at September 30, 2011 remaining relatively flat compared to $163.0 million at December 31, 2010. Securities held-to-maturity was $3.6 million and $3.7 million at September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively. The Company has purchased U.S. Treasury securities to replace matured pledged securities in order to meet municipal and repurchase agreement pledge requirements to minimize interest rate risk during the sustained low interest rate environment.

The net unrealized gains on securities available-for-sale, on a pre-tax basis, decreased by $514,000 to $1.2 million at September 30, 2011. The decrease in the net unrealized gains on investment securities available-for-sale primarily reflects a decrease of $369,000 in the net unrealized gains on government sponsored residential mortgage-backed securities and a net decrease of $145,000 in our preferred equity securities. As of September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively, our available-for-sale investment securities portfolio gross unrealized losses equaled $568,000 and $297,000, of which $553,000 and $292,000, respectively, were from securities that had been in a loss position of twelve months or more. Management does not believe that the unrealized loss represents an other-than-temporary impairment.

Net loans receivable increased $53.6 million at September 30, 2011 to $1.21 billion compared to $1.16 billion at December 31, 2010 due to increasing our focus on residential and commercial lending. The loan portfolio consisted of $471.8 million and $453.6 million in residential real estate loans, $389.2 million and $361.8 million in commercial real estate loans, $50.6 million and $46.6 million in construction loans, $11.3 million and $12.6 million in installment loans, $125.5 million and $112.5 million in commercial loans, $98.7 million and $81.8 million in home equity lines of credit loans, $75.9 million and $105.2 million in resort (timeshare) loans and $2.4 million and $2.3 million in collateral, demand and revolving credit loans at September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively.

The allowance for loan losses decreased $4.6 million to $16.1 million at September 30, 2011 from $20.7 million at December 31, 2010 primarily due to a $4.9 million fully impaired resort loan being charged-off in the second quarter of 2011. Impaired loans increased to $40.6 million as of September 30, 2011 from $31.0 million as of December 31, 2010. Non-performing loans increased to $18.4 million at September 30, 2011 from $17.7 million as of December 31, 2010. At September 30, 2011, the allowance for loan losses represented 1.3% of total loans and 87.3% of non-performing loans, compared to 1.8% of total loans and 117.0% of non-performing loans as of December 31, 2010. Net charge-offs for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 were $5.5 million, or 0.5%, compared to net charge-offs for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 of $1.8 million, or 0.2%, to average loans outstanding for the respective period. The increase was primarily due to a $4.9 million fully impaired resort loan charged-off in the second quarter of 2011. Loan delinquencies 30 days and greater at September 30, 2011 increased $4.2 million to $22.9 million from $18.7 million at December 31, 2010. The increase in past due loans is primarily due to weak economic conditions leading to stress on cash flows of our borrowers primarily with our residential and commercial real estate portfolios.

Prepaid expenses and other assets increased $5.2 million to $13.1 million at September 30, 2011 from $7.9 million at December 31, 2010 primarily due to an increase of $5.8 million in an interest rate swap derivative receivable offset by a $1.0 million decrease in prepaid FDIC assessments.

Deposits increased $133.2 million, or 12.0%, to $1.2 billion at September 30, 2011 from $1.1 billion at December 31, 2010. Interest-bearing deposits grew $107.1 million, or 11.2%, to $1.1 billion at September 30, 2011 from $958.3 million at December 31, 2010. Noninterest-bearing demand deposits totaled $176.2 million at September, 2011, an increase of $26.0 million from December 31, 2010 due to our continued efforts to obtain more individual and commercial account relationships. At September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively, interest-bearing deposits consisted of $285.8 million and $217.2 million in NOW accounts, $223.8 million and $158.2 million in money market accounts, $144.1 million and $129.1 million in savings accounts, $411.3 million and $453.7 million in time deposits and $392,000 and $137,000 in club accounts. The $107.1 million increase in interest-bearing deposits from December 31, 2010 to September 30, 2011 was primarily due to the opening of our 16th branch located in West Hartford, CT during the second quarter, an increase in municipal deposits accounts of approximately $63.2 million and an increase in overall deposits as we continue to grow our customer base. Our weighted-average rate paid on deposits outstanding for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 declined 10 basis points to 0.75% from 0.85% when compared to the same period in the prior year.

Federal Home Loan Bank advances decreased $8.0 million, or 11.3%, to $63.0 million at September 30, 2011 from $71.0 million at December 31, 2010. Our repurchase liabilities decreased $11.8 million to $72.3 million at September 30, 2011 from $84.0 million at December 31, 2010 primarily due to fluctuations in cash flows in our business checking customers using our repurchase swap product where excess funds are swept daily into a collateralized account.

Total stockholders’ equity increased $162.9 million, or 171.5%, to $257.9 million at September 30, 2011 compared to $95.0 million at December 31, 2010 primarily due to proceeds received from our initial public offering, which net of expenses of $4.1 million, totaled $167.8 million.

Summary of Operating Results for the Three Months Ended September 30, 2011 and 2010

The following discussion provides a summary and comparison of our operating results for the three months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010.

	For the Three Months Ended September 30,
	2011		2010		$ Change			% Change
(Dollars in thousands)
Net interest income	$	11,987	$	12,756	$	(769	)		(6.0	)%
Provision for loan losses		300		2,488		(2,188	)		(87.9	)%
Non-interest income		1,728		2,414		(686	)		(28.4	)%
Non-interest expense		11,945		10,755		1,190			11.1	%
Income before taxes		1,470		1,927		(457	)		(23.7	)%
Income tax expense		427		533		(106	)		(19.9	)%
Net income	$	1,043	$	1,394	$	(351	)		(25.2	)%

For the quarter ended September 30, 2011, net income decreased by $351,000 to a net income of $1.0 million compared to net income of $1.4 million for the quarter end September 30, 2010. The decrease in net income primarily resulted from a decrease in net interest and non-interest income, provision for loan losses offset by an increase in non-interest expense which was primarily due to an increase in salaries and employee benefits as we continue to add staff to expand the services we offer our existing and new customers.

Comparison of Operating Results for the Three Months Ended September 30, 2011 and 2010

Our results of operations depend primarily on net interest income, which is the difference between the interest income from earning assets, such as loans and investments, and the interest expense incurred on interest-bearing liabilities, such as deposits and borrowings. We also generate noninterest income, including service charges on deposit accounts, mortgage servicing income, bank-owned life insurance income, safe deposit box rental fees, brokerage fees, insurance commissions and other miscellaneous fees. Our noninterest expense primarily consists of employee compensation and benefits, occupancy and equipment costs and other noninterest expenses. Our results of operations are also affected by our provision for loan losses.

Interest and Dividend Income: For the quarter ended September, 2011, interest and dividend income decreased $1.0 million, or 6.4%, to $14.7 million from $15.7 million for the same period in the prior year. Our average interest-earning assets for the quarter ended September 30, 2011, grew by $214.8 million, or 15.4%, to $1.6 billion from $1.4 billion for the same period last year, while the yield on average interest-earning assets decreased 85 basis points to 3.65% from 4.50%. An increase of $7.2 million in the average balance of securities for the quarter ended September 30, 2011 when compared to the quarter ended September 30, 2010, offset with a 206 basis point decline in the yield on the securities portfolio resulted in a $743,000 or 64.7%, reduction in the interest and dividends on investments. The decline in yield was primarily due to the sale of $36.1 million of appreciated Government sponsored residential mortgage-backed securities that occurred in September and December 2010 that were replaced by lower yielding U.S. Treasury obligations in order to assist the Company in retaining a “well capitalized” risk-based capital ratio status with federal and state banking agencies. Interest income on loans receivable decreased $353,000 or 2.4%, to $14.1 million for the quarter ended September 30, 2011 from $14.5 million for the same period in the prior year due to an increase of $65.3 million or 5.8%, in the average balance of loans receivable, partially offset by a 40 basis point decline in the weighted average yield. Other interest income earned on federal funds and other earnings assets increased $96,000 due to the average balance increasing $142.4 million as the funds obtained from the initial public offering were invested in federal funds sold until they could be prudently deployed in longer term investments.

Net Interest Income Analysis: Average Balance Sheets, Interest and Yields/Costs

The following tables present the average balance sheets, average yields and costs and certain other information for the periods indicated therein. No tax-equivalent yield adjustments were made, as the effect thereof was not material. All average balances are daily average balances. Non-accrual loans were included in the computation of average balances, but have been reflected in the table as loans carrying a zero percent yield. The yields set forth below include the effect of net deferred costs and premiums that are amortized to interest income or expense. Yields and rates have been annualized.

	Three Months Ended September 30,
	2011								2010
	Average Balance		Interest and Dividends			Yield/Cost			Average Balance		Interest and Dividends			Yield/Cost
(Dollars in thousands)
Interest-earning assets:
Loans receivable	$	1,193,273		14,104			4.74	%	$	1,127,992		14,457			5.14	%
Securities		155,241		405			1.05	%		148,087		1,148			3.11	%
Federal Home Loan Bank of Boston stock		7,449		6			0.32	%		7,449		-			0.00	%
Fed Funds and other earning assets		253,677		144			0.23	%		111,297		58			0.21	%
Total interest-earning assets		1,609,640		14,659			3.65	%		1,394,825		15,663			4.50	%
Noninterest-earning assets		64,673								85,141
Total assets	$	1,674,313							$	1,479,966

Interest-bearing liabilities:
NOW accounts	$	289,658		155			0.21	%	$	348,990		335			0.39	%
Money market		217,295		528			0.97	%		156,790		325			0.83	%
Savings accounts		148,380		60			0.16	%		133,262		69			0.21	%
Certificates of deposit		415,279		1,143			1.10	%		423,073		1,330			1.26	%
Total interest-bearing deposits		1,070,612		1,886			0.71	%		1,062,115		2,059			0.78	%
Advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank		66,207		519			3.14	%		69,185		555			3.22	%
Repurchase Agreement Borrowing		21,000		182			3.48	%		21,000		182			3.48	%
Repurchase liabilities		72,471		85			0.47	%		64,536		111			0.69	%
Total interest-bearing liabilities		1,230,290		2,672			0.87	%		1,216,836		2,907			0.96	%
Noninterest-bearing deposits		152,092								137,011
Other noninterest-bearing liabilities		30,774								26,739
Total liabilities		1,413,156								1,380,586
Capital		261,157								99,380
Total liabilities and capital	$	1,674,313							$	1,479,966

Net interest income				11,987								12,756
Net interest rate spread (1)							2.78	%							3.54	%
Net interest-earning assets (2)	$	379,350							$	177,989
Net interest margin (3)							2.99	%							3.67	%
Average interest-earning assets to average interest-bearing liabilities
				130.83	%							114.63	%

(1)	Net interest rate spread represents the difference between the yield on average interest-earning assets and the cost of average interest-bearing liabilities.
(2)	Net interest-earning assets represent total interest-earning assets less total interest-bearing liabilities.
(3)	Net interest margin represents net interest income divided by average total interest-earning assets.

Rate Volume Analysis

The following table sets forth the effects of changing rates and volumes on net interest income for the periods indicated. The rate column shows the effects attributable to changes in rate (changes in rate multiplied by prior volume). The volume column shows the effects attributable to changes in volume (changes in volume multiplied by prior rate). The total column represents the sum of the volume and rate columns. For purposes of this table, changes attributable to both rate and volume that cannot be segregated have been allocated proportionately based on the changes due to rate and the changes due to volume.

	Three Months Ended September 30, 2011 Compared to Three Months Ended September 30, 2010
	Increase (decrease) due to
(Dollars in thousands)	Volume			Rate			Total
Interest-earning assets:
Loans receivable, net	$	1,091		$	(1,444	)	$	(353	)
Investment securities		51			(794	)		(743	)
Federal Home Loan Bank of Boston stock		-			6			6
Fed Funds and other interest-earning assets		80			6			86
Total interest-earning assets		1,222			(2,226	)		(1,004	)

Interest-bearing liabilities:
NOW accounts		(50	)		(130	)		(180	)
Money market		145			58			203
Savings accounts		4			(13	)		(9	)
Certificates of deposit		(23	)		(164	)		(187	)
Total interest-bearing deposits		76			(249	)		(173	)
Advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank		(18	)		(18	)		(36	)
Repurchase agreement borrowing		-			-			-
Repurchase liabilities		31			(57	)		(26	)
Total interest-bearing liabilities		89			(324	)		(235	)
Increase (decrease) in net interest income	$	1,133		$	(1,902	)	$	(769	)

Net Interest Income: Net interest income is determined by the interest rate spread (i.e., the difference between the yields earned on interest-earning assets and the rates paid on interest-bearing liabilities) and the relative amounts of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities. Net interest income before the provision for loan losses was $12.0 million for the quarter ended September 30, 2011, compared to $12.8 million for the same period in 2010. The $769,000, or 6.0%, decrease in net interest income was primarily due to a $680,000, or 68.8%, decrease in interest income related to United States Government and agency obligations. Average interest-earning assets increased by $214.8 million, or 15.4%, to $1.6 billion during the quarter ended September 30, 2011 when compared to the same period in the prior year. Average interest-bearing liabilities remained stable at $1.2 billion at September 30, 2011 and 2010. Our net interest rate spread decreased 76 basis points to 2.78% during 2011 from 3.54% for 2010, primarily due to a 85 basis point decline in the weighted average yield of interest-earning assets to 3.65% for the quarter ended September 30, 2011 from 4.50% for the quarter ended September 30, 2010.

Interest Expense: Interest expense for the quarter ended September 30, 2011 remained relatively stable at $2.7 million from $2.9 million for the same period in the prior year as our average interest-bearing deposits also remained relatively unchanged compared to the same period in the prior year. The average cost of interest-bearing deposits declined 7 basis points to 0.71% for the three months ended September 30, 2011 from 0.78% for the three months ended September 30, 2010. The decrease in the cost of funds was primarily due to the impact that the sustained low interest rate environment had on our NOW accounts and time deposits which resulted in a decrease of 18 basis points and 16 basis points, respectively, during the three months ended September 30, 2011 over the same period in the prior year, offset by a 14 basis point increase in money markets due to promotional rates run in connection with our existing branches and the opening of our newest branch. The decline in the average cost of interest-bearing liabilities was largely attributable to our implementation of a more disciplined pricing strategy for time deposits where we reduced short-term rates, maintained longer-term rates at competitive rates and reduced our rate concession practices for customers who did not utilize multiple bank services.

Provision for Loan Losses: The allowance for loan losses is maintained at a level management determined to be appropriate to absorb estimated credit losses that are both probable and reasonably estimable at the dates of the financial statements. Management evaluates the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses on a quarterly basis and charges any provision for loan losses needed to current operations. The assessment considers historical loss experience, historical and current delinquency statistics, the loan portfolio segment and the amount of loans in the loan portfolio, the financial strength of the borrowers, adverse situations that may affect the borrower’s ability to repay, estimated value of any underlying collateral, and prevailing economic conditions and other credit quality indicators.

Management recorded a provision for loan losses of $300,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2011 which is a decline of $2.2 million from the provision of $2.5 million recorded during the same period last year. The provision recorded is based upon management’s analysis of the allowance for loan losses necessary to absorb the estimated credit losses in the loan portfolio for the period.

At September 30, 2011, the allowance for loan losses totaled $16.1 million, or 1.3% of total loans and 87.3% of non-performing loans, compared to an allowance for loan losses of $20.7 million, which represented 1.8% of total loans and 117.0% of non-performing loans at December 31, 2010.

Noninterest Income: Sources of noninterest income primarily include banking service charges on deposit accounts, brokerage and insurance fees, bank-owned life insurance and mortgage servicing income. Other-than-temporary impairment of securities, if any, are also included in noninterest income (loss).

The following table summarizes noninterest income for the three months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010:

	For the Three Months Ended September 30,
	2011		2010		$ Change			% Change
(Dollars in thousands)
Fees for customer services	$	852	$	800	$	52			6.5	%
Net gain on sales of investments		89		965		(876	)		(90.8	)%
Net gain on loans sold		284		299		(15	)		(5.0	)%
Brokerage and insurance fee income		30		102		(72	)		(70.6	)%
Bank owned life insurance income		177		187		(10	)		(5.3	)%
Other		296		61		235			385.2	%
Total noninterest income	$	1,728	$	2,414	$	(686	)		(28.4	)%

Noninterest income decreased by $686,000 to $1.7 million for the three months ended September 30, 2011 compared to the same period ended September 30, 2010. The net gain on sales of investments in the prior period was the result of implementing a strategy to sell appreciated Government sponsored residential mortgage-backed securities in order to bolster our risk based capital ratio until our initial public offering could be completed to ensure that we remained well capitalized under the federal and state banking regulations. Brokerage and insurance fee income decreased $72,000 or 70.6% to $30,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2011 which resulted from replacing our non-deposit investment services third party provider in the beginning of 2011. The above decreases were offset by a $235,000 increase in other noninterest income totaling $296,000 primarily due to receiving a $282,000 income distribution on a limited partnership investment.

Noninterest Expense: The following table summarizes noninterest expense for the three months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010:

	For the Three Months Ended September 30,
	2011		2010		$ Change			% Change
(Dollars in thousands)
Salaries and employee benefits	$	7,065	$	5,656	$	1,409			24.9	%
Occupancy expense		1,129		1,017		112			11.0	%
Furniture and equipment expense		1,038		1,116		(78	)		(7.0	)%
FDIC assessment		56		502		(446	)		(88.8	)%
Marketing		505		628		(123	)		(19.6	)%
Other operating expenses		2,152		1,836		316			17.2	%
Total noninterest expense	$	11,945	$	10,755	$	1,190			11.1	%

Noninterest expense increased $1.2 million or 11.1% to $11.9 million for the three months ended September 30, 2011 compared to $10.8 million for the same period ended September 30, 2010. Salaries and employee benefits expense increased $1.4 million which was mainly attributable to $522,000 related to our employee stock option plan (“ESOP”) expense which was established as part of our reorganization and the addition of 35 full time equivalent employees to support our new and existing branches, our commercial lending, accounting and loan workout areas and the implementation of cash management, government banking and a small business lending department. Occupancy expense increased $112,000 or 11.0% to $1.1 million primarily due to the addition of our West Hartford branch in April 2011 and increases in rent and maintenance at our corporate and other branch locations. We incurred FDIC assessments of $56,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2011, representing a $446,000 decrease compared to the same period ended September 30, 2010 due to a change in the FDIC’s assessment calculation methodology. Marketing expenses decreased $123,000 or 19.6% to $505,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2011 when compared to the same period in the prior year due to the opening of our Berlin and Plainville branches in the 3rd quarter of 2010 and $136K incurred developing our e-business. Other operating expenses increased $316,000 to $2.2 million primarily due to an increase in professional and consulting fees totaling approximately $67,000 incurred primarily to assist us in evaluating our core operating system and strategic planning and other various increases in operating costs for the three months ended September 30, 2011 compared to the same period ended September 30, 2010.

Income Tax Expense: Income tax expense for the three months ended September 30, 2011 was $427,000 on income before taxes totaling $1.5 million compared to a $533,000 income tax expense for the three months ended September 30, 2010 on income before taxes totaling $1.9 million.

Summary of Operating Results for the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2011 and 2010

The following discussion provides a summary and comparison of our operating results for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010.

	For the Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2011			2010		$ Change			% Change
(Dollars in thousands)
Net interest income	$	35,852		$	37,153	$	(1,301	)		(3.5	)%
Provision for loan losses		900			3,688		(2,788	)		(75.6	)%
Non-interest income		4,438			4,685		(247	)		(5.3	)%
Non-interest expense		43,533			30,876		12,657			41.0	%
(Loss) income before taxes		(4,143	)		7,274		(11,417	)		(157.0	)%
Income tax (benefit) expense		(1,557	)		2,260		(3,817	)		(168.9	)%
Net (loss) income	$	(2,586	)	$	5,014	$	(7,600	)		(151.6	)%

For the nine months ended September 30, 2011, net income decreased by $7.6 million to a net loss of $2.6 million compared to net income of $5.0 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010. The decrease in net income primarily resulted from a $6.9 million contribution to our charitable foundation, Farmington Bank Community Foundation, Inc. and $851,000 incurred to complete the phase out the Phantom Stock Plan. Excluding the $6.9 million foundation contribution, the $851,000 incurred to complete the phase out the Phantom Stock Plan and the related tax benefit of $2.6 million, net income would have been $2.5 million, a decrease of $2.5 million compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2010 primarily due to an increase in salaries and employee benefits as we continue to expand the services we offer our existing and new customers and the opening of three new branches over the past 15 months.

Comparison of Operating Results for the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2011 and 2010

Interest and Dividend Income: For the nine months ended September 30, 2011, interest and dividend income decreased $1.7 million, or 3.7%, to $44.1 million from $45.8 million for the same period in the prior year. Our average interest-earning assets for the nine months ended September 30, 2011, grew by $187.0 million, or 14.6%, to $1.5 billion from $1.3 billion for the same period last year, while the yield on average interest-earning assets decreased 77 basis points to 4.01% from 4.78%. An increase of $18.0 million in the average balance of securities for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 when compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2010, offset by a 254 basis point decline in the yield resulted in a $2.4 million or 62.5%, reduction in the interest and dividends on investments. The decline in yield was primarily due to the sale of $36.1 million of appreciated Government sponsored residential mortgage-backed securities that occurred in September and December 2010 and were replaced by lower yielding U.S. Treasury obligations in order to assist the Company in retaining a “well capitalized” status with federal and state banking agencies. Interest income on loans receivable increased $555,000, or 1.3%, to $42.4 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 from $41.8 million for the same period in the prior year due to an increase of $98.4 million, or 9.1%, in the average balance of loans receivable, partially offset by a 37 basis point decline in the weighted average yield. Other interest income earned on federal funds sold and other short-term investments increased $127,000 due to the average balance increasing $70.6 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 when compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2010.

Net Interest Income Analysis: Average Balance Sheets, Interest and Yields/Costs

	Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2011								2010
	Average Balance		Interest and Dividends			Yield/Cost			Average Balance		Interest and Dividends			Yield/Cost
(Dollars in thousands)
Interest-earning assets:
Loans receivable	$	1,175,749		42,395			4.82	%	$	1,077,376		41,840			5.19	%
Securities		153,127		1,434			1.25	%		135,140		3,828			3.79	%
Federal Home Loan Bank of Boston stock		7,449		16			0.29	%		7,449		-			0.00	%
Fed Funds and other earning assets		131,640		219			0.22	%		61,028		92			0.20	%
Total interest-earning assets		1,467,965		44,064			4.01	%		1,280,993		45,760			4.78	%
Noninterest-earning assets		81,552								80,537
Total assets	$	1,549,517							$	1,361,530

Interest-bearing liabilities:
NOW accounts	$	258,593		516			0.27	%	$	254,806		805			0.42	%
Money market		200,673		1,483			0.99	%		150,564		919			0.82	%
Savings accounts		147,443		205			0.19	%		130,510		195			0.20	%
Certificates of deposit		426,118		3,588			1.13	%		428,844		4,241			1.32	%
Total interest-bearing deposits		1,032,827		5,792			0.75	%		964,724		6,160			0.85	%
Advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank		67,430		1,575			3.12	%		66,043		1,612			3.26	%
Repurchase Agreement Borrowing		21,000		540			3.44	%		21,000		540			3.44	%
Repurchase liabilities		72,688		305			0.56	%		56,643		295			0.70	%
Total interest-bearing liabilities		1,193,945		8,212			0.92	%		1,108,410		8,607			1.04	%
Noninterest-bearing deposits		172,905								131,011
Other noninterest-bearing liabilities		28,750								24,607
Total liabilities		1,395,600								1,264,028
Capital		153,917								97,502
Total liabilities and capital	$	1,549,517							$	1,361,530

Net interest income				35,852								37,153
Net interest rate spread (1)							3.09	%							3.74	%
Net interest-earning assets (2)	$	274,020							$	172,583
Net interest margin (3)							3.27	%							3.88	%
Average interest-earning assets to average interest-bearing liabilities				122.95	%							115.57	%

(1)	Net interest rate spread represents the difference between the yield on average interest-earning assets and the cost of average interest-bearing liabilities.
(2)	Net interest-earning assets represent total interest-earning assets less total interest-bearing liabilities.
(3)	Net interest margin represents net interest income divided by average total interest-earning assets.

Rate Volume Analysis

	Nine Months Ended September 30, 2011 Compared to Nine Months Ended September 30, 2010
	Increase (decrease) due to
(Dollars in thousands)	Volume			Rate			Total
Interest-earning assets:
Loans receivable, net	$	2,573		$	(2,018	)	$	555
Investment securities		621			(3,015	)		(2,394	)
Federal Home Loan Bank of Boston stock		-			16			16
Fed Funds and other interest-earning assets		117			10			127
Total interest-earning assets		3,311			(5,007	)		(1,696	)

Interest-bearing liabilities:
NOW accounts		12			(301	)		(289	)
Money market		325			239			564
Savings accounts		10			-			10
Certificates of deposit		(28	)		(625	)		(653	)
Total interest-bearing deposits		319			(687	)		(368	)
Advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank		31			(68	)		(37	)
Repurchase agreement borrowing		-			-			-
Repurchase liabilities		95			(85	)		10
Total interest-bearing liabilities		445			(840	)		(395	)

Increase (decrease) in net interest income	$	2,866		$	(4,167	)	$	(1,301	)

Net Interest Income: Net interest income before the provision for loan losses was $35.9 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2011, compared to $37.2 million for the same period in 2010. The $1.3 million, or 3.5%, decrease in net interest income was primarily due a $2.3 million, or 67.1%, decrease in interest income related to United States Government and agency obligations offset by an increase in interest income on loans receivable totaling $555,000. Average interest-earning assets increased by $187.0 million, or 14.6%, to $1.5 billion for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 when compared to the same period in the prior year. Average interest-bearing liabilities increased $85.5 million, or 7.7%, to $1.2 billion during the nine months ended September 30, 2011 when compared to the same period in 2010. Our net interest rate spread decreased 65 basis points to 3.09% during 2011 from 3.74% for 2010, primarily due to a 77 basis point decline in the weighted average cost of interest-earning assets to 4.01% for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 from 4.78% for the nine months ended September 30, 2010.

Interest Expense: Interest expense for the quarter ended September 30, 2011 decreased $395,000 or 4.6% totaling $8.2 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 from $8.6 million for the same period in the prior year even though our average interest-bearing deposits grew $68.1 million or 7.1% over the same period in the prior year. The decrease in interest expense resulted from a 10 basis points decline in the average cost of interest-bearing deposits to 0.75% for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 from 0.85% for the nine months ended September 30, 2010. The decrease in the cost of funds was primarily due to the impact that the sustained low interest rate environment had on our NOW accounts and time deposits which resulted in a decrease of 15 basis points and 19 basis points, respectively, during the nine months ended September 30, 2011 over the same period in the prior year, offset by a 17 basis point increase in money markets due to promotional rates run in connection with our existing branches and the opening of our newest branch. The decline in the average cost of interest-bearing liabilities was largely attributable to our implementation of a more disciplined pricing strategy for time deposits where we reduced short-term rates, maintained longer-term rates at a competitive rate and reduced our rate concession practices for customers who did not utilize multiple bank services.

Provision for Loan Losses: Management recorded a provision for loan losses of $900,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 which is a decline of $2.8 million from the provision of $3.7 million recorded during the same period last year. The provision recorded is based upon management’s analysis of the allowance for loan losses necessary to absorb the estimated credit losses in the loan portfolio for the period.

Noninterest Income: The following table summarizes noninterest income for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010:

	For the Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2011		2010		$ Change			% Change
(Dollars in thousands)
Fees for customer services	$	2,499	$	2,226	$	273			12.3	%
Net gain on sales of investments		89		965		(876	)		(90.8	)%
Net gain on loans sold		629		323		306			94.7	%
Brokerage and insurance fee income		164		317		(153	)		(48.3	)%
Bank owned life insurance income		525		485		40			8.2	%
Other		532		369		163			44.2	%
Total noninterest income	$	4,438	$	4,685	$	(247	)		(5.3	)%

Noninterest income decreased by $247,000 to $4.4 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 compared to the same period ended September 30, 2010. Fees for customer services increased $273,000 or 12.3% primarily due to increases of $44,000 in debit card transactions as a result of our three new branches opening and an increase in customer accounts and $145,000 increase in cash management service fees. The net gain on sales of investments in the prior period was the result of implementing a strategy to sell appreciated Government sponsored residential mortgage-backed securities in order to bolster our risk based capital ratio until our initial public offering could be completed to ensure that we remained well capitalized under the federal and state banking regulations. The gain on the sale of fixed-rate residential mortgage loans increased by $306,000 to $629,000 compared to a $323,000 gain during the same period in 2010 as a result of the continuation of our secondary market residential lending program initiated during the third quarter of 2010. Brokerage and insurance fee income decreased $153,000 or 48.3% to $164,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 as a result of replacing our existing third party provider of non-deposit investment services in the beginning of 2011. The increase in other noninterest income totaling $532,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 is primarily due to a $275,000 increase in an income distribution on a limited partnership investment for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 compared to the same period in 2010.

Noninterest Expense: The following table summarizes noninterest expense for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010:

	For the Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2011		2010		$ Change			% Change
(Dollars in thousands)
Salaries and employee benefits	$	21,106	$	16,615	$	4,491			27.0	%
Occupancy expense		3,460		3,076		384			12.5	%
Furniture and equipment expense		3,003		2,967		36			1.2	%
FDIC assessment		1,126		1,318		(192	)		(14.6	)%
Marketing		1,636		1,799		(163	)		(9.1	)%
Contribution to Farmington Bank
Community Foundation, Inc.		6,877		-		6,877			100.0	%
Other operating expenses		6,325		5,101		1,224			24.0	%
Total noninterest expense	$	43,533	$	30,876	$	12,657			41.0	%

Noninterest expense increased $12.7 million, or 41.0%, to $43.5 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 compared to $30.9 million for the same period ended September 30, 2010. Salary and employee benefits expense increased $4.5 million which was mainly attributable to $851,000 incurred to phase out the phantom stock plan, $533,000 related to our employee stock option plan (“ESOP”) which was established as part of our reorganization and the addition of 35 full time equivalent employees to support our three new branches, our commercial lending, accounting and loan workout areas and the implementation of cash management, government banking and a small business lending department. Occupancy expense increased $384,000, or 12.5%, to $3.5 million based on approximately $309,000 in costs associated with our three new branches which all opened in the past 15 months and increases in rent and maintenance at our corporate and other branch locations. We incurred FDIC assessments of $1.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2011, representing a $192,000 decrease due to a change in the FDIC’s assessment calculation methodology. As part of our initial public stock offering in June 2011, we contributed $6.9 million in stock in connection with our reorganization to our charitable foundation to benefit the nonprofit organizations and community organizations within the communities we serve. Other operating expenses increased $1.2 million to $6.3 million primarily due to an increase in professional and consulting fees totaling approximately $715,000 to assist in various projects including the evaluation of our core processing system and strategic planning services and other various increases in operating costs for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 compared to the same period ended September 30, 2010.

Income Tax (Benefit) Expense: Income tax benefit for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 was $1.6 million due to the tax treatment for the $6.9 million contribution to our foundation compared to a $2.3 million income tax provision for the nine months ended September 30, 2010.

Liquidity and Capital Resources:

We maintain liquid assets at levels we consider adequate to meet our liquidity needs. We adjust our liquidity levels to fund loan commitments, repay our borrowings, fund deposit outflows, fund operations and pay escrow obligations on items in our loan portfolio. We also adjust liquidity as appropriate to meet asset and liability management objectives.

Our primary sources of liquidity are deposits, principal repayment and prepayment of loans, the sale in the secondary market of loans held for sale, maturities and sales of investment securities and other short-term investments, periodic pay downs of mortgage-backed securities, and earnings and funds provided from operations. While scheduled principal repayments on loans are a relatively predictable source of funds, deposit flows and loan prepayments are greatly influenced by market interest rates, economic conditions and rates offered by our competitors. We set the interest rates on our deposits to maintain a desired level of total deposits. Also, we invest excess funds in short-term interest-earning assets, which provide liquidity to meet lending requirements. In addition to our primary sources of liquidity, the net proceeds from our stock offering totaling $167.8 million will enable us to maintain higher liquidity levels and provide us with sufficient sources of liquidity to satisfy our short- and long-term liquidity needs as of September 30, 2011.

A portion of our liquidity consists of cash and cash equivalents, which are a product of our operating, investing and financing activities. At September 30, 2011, $240.6 million of our assets were invested in cash and cash equivalents, of this amount, $167.8 million represented the net proceeds from our stock offering in June 2011. Our primary sources of cash are principal repayments on loans, proceeds from the calls and maturities of investment securities, increases in deposit accounts, proceeds from residential loan sales and advances from FHLBB.

For the nine months ended September 30, 2011, loan originations and purchases, net of collected principal and loan sales, totaled $53.7 million. Cash received from maturities of available for sale investment securities totaled $304.0 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2011. We purchased $302.1 million of available-for-sale investment securities primarily in U.S treasury obligations during the nine months ended September 30, 2011.

Liquidity management is both a daily and longer-term function of business management. If we require funds beyond our ability to generate them internally, borrowing agreements exist with the FHLBB, which provides an additional source of funds. At September 30, 2011, we had $63.0 million in advances from the FHLBB and an additional available borrowing limit of $208.5 million based on collateral requirements of the FHLBB. Internal policies limit borrowings to 25.0% of total assets or $424.1 million at September 30, 2011. Other sources of funds include access to a pre-approved unsecured line of credit with a Bank for $20.0 million, which was undrawn at September 30, 2011. During 2010, we entered into the Federal Reserve Bank’s discount window loan collateral program that enables us to borrow up to $84.6 million on an overnight basis as of September 30, 2011. The funding arrangement was collateralized by $120.1 million in pledged commercial real estate loans as of September 30, 2011. During 2011, the Company entered into a $3.5 million unsecured line of credit agreement with a bank which expired on October 31, 2011. The Company is currently working with the bank to renew the $3.5 million unsecured line.

We had outstanding commitments to originate loans of $51.7 million and unfunded commitments under construction loans, lines of credit and stand-by letters of credit of $239.5 million at September 30, 2011. At September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, time deposits scheduled to mature in less than one year totaled $303.6 million and $362.7 million, respectively. Based on prior experience, management believes that a significant portion of such deposits will remain with us, although there can be no assurance that this will be the case. In the event a significant portion of our deposits are not retained by us, we will have to utilize other funding sources, such as FHLBB advances, brokered deposits, our $20.0 million unsecured line of credit with PNC Bank, our $8.8 million secured line of credit with the FHLBB or our $84.6 million overnight borrowing arrangement with the Federal Reserve Bank in order to maintain our level of assets. Alternatively, we would reduce our level of liquid assets, such as our cash and cash equivalents in order to meet funding needs. In addition, the cost of such deposits may be significantly higher if market interest rates are higher or if there is an increased amount of competition for deposits in our market area at the time of renewal.

Our total risk weighted capital to risk weighted assets increased from 10.28% at December 31, 2010 to 24.21% at September 30, 2011, which is above the 10.0% minimum total risk-based capital ratio that the federal and state banking regulations require us to maintain in order to be considered well capitalized. Prior to our conversion to a public company on June 29, 2011, we were able to maintain our capital levels by purchasing zero-risk weighted, lower yielding investments and making certain other strategic operational decisions until our initial public offering was completed. The $167.8 million net proceeds from the stock offering has significantly strengthened our capital levels allowing us to aggressively pursue our strategic initiatives.

Item 3.

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

General: The majority of our assets and liabilities are monetary in nature. Consequently, our most significant form of market risk is interest rate risk. Our assets, consisting primarily of loans and available-for-sale investment securities, generally have longer contractual maturities than our liabilities, consisting primarily of deposits. As a result, a principal part of our business strategy is to manage interest rate risk and reduce the exposure of our net interest income to changes in market interest rates. Accordingly, our board of directors has established an asset/liability committee which is responsible for (i) evaluating the interest rate risk inherent in our assets and liabilities, (ii) determining the level of risk that is appropriate given our business strategy, operating environment, capital, liquidity and performance objectives and (iii) managing this risk consistent with the guidelines approved by our board of directors. Management monitors the level of interest rate risk on a regular basis and the asset/liability committee meets at least quarterly to review our asset/liability policies and interest rate risk position.

We have sought to manage our interest rate risk in order to minimize the exposure of our earnings and capital to changes in interest rates. During the low interest rate environment that has existed in recent years, we have implemented the following strategies to manage our interest rate risk: (i) emphasizing adjustable rate loans, including adjustable rate one-to-four family, commercial and consumer loans, (ii) reducing and shortening the expected average life of the investment portfolio and (iii) periodically lengthening the term structure of our borrowings from the FHLBB. Additionally, beginning in mid-2010, we began selling the majority of our fixed-rate residential mortgages to the secondary market. These measures should serve to reduce the volatility of our future net interest income in different interest rate environments.

Quantitative Analysis: An economic value of equity and an income simulation analysis are used to estimate our interest rate risk exposure at a particular point in time. We are most reliant on the income simulation method as it is a dynamic method that incorporates our forecasted balance sheet growth assumptions under the different interest rate scenarios tested. We utilize the income simulation method to analyze our interest rate sensitivity position and to manage the risk associated with interest rate movements. At least quarterly, our asset/liability committee reviews the potential effect that changes in interest rates could have on the repayment or repricing of rate sensitive assets and the funding requirements of rate sensitive liabilities. Our most recent simulation uses projected repricing of assets and liabilities on the basis of contractual maturities, anticipated repayments and scheduled rate adjustments. Prepayment rate assumptions can have a significant impact on interest income simulation results. Because of the large percentage of loans and mortgage-backed securities we hold, rising or falling interest rates may have a significant impact on the actual prepayment speeds of our mortgage related assets that may in turn effect our interest rate sensitivity position. When interest rates rise, prepayment speeds slow and the average expected life of our assets would tend to lengthen more than the expected average life of our liabilities and therefore would most likely result in a decrease to our asset sensitive position.

Our asset/liability policy currently limits projected changes in net interest income to a maximum variance of (5.0%,10.0% and 15.0%) assuming a 100, 200 or 300 basis point interest rate shock, respectively, as measured over a 12 month period when compared to the flat rate scenario.

At September 30, 2011, income at risk (i.e., the change in net interest income) increased 13.9% and 18.0% based on a 300 basis point and 400 basis point average increase, respectively, and decreased 2.1% based on a 100 basis point decrease. The following table depicts the percentage increase and/or decrease in estimated net interest income over twelve months based on the three scenarios run during the three month period ended September 30, 2011:


	Percentage Decrease in Estimated Net Interest Income Over 12 Months
300 basis point increase		13.9	%
400 basis point increase		18.0	%
100 basis point decrease		(2.1	)%

Item 4.

Controls and Procedures

Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer, we evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based upon that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that, as of the end of the period covered by this report, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective.

There were no significant changes made in the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) or in other factors that could significantly affect the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting during the period covered by this report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

Part II. Other Information

Item 1.

Legal Proceedings

The Company and its subsidiaries are subject to various legal actions arising in the normal course of business. In the opinion of management, the resolution of these legal actions is not expected to have a material adverse effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

Item 1A.

Risk Factors

There have been no material changes in the “Risk Factors” from those previously disclosed in the Form S-1/A filed on May 16, 2011.

Item 2.

Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

(a)

Not applicable.

(b)

Not applicable.

(c)

During the quarter ending September 30, 2011, the Employee Stock Ownership Plan made the following purchases of the Company’s stock:

Period	(a) Total Number of Shares (or Units) Purchased		(b) Average Price Paid per Share (or Unit)		(c) Total Number of Shares (or Units) Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs		(d) Maximum Number (or Approximate Dollar Value) of Shares (or Units) that May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs
July 1-31, 2011		209,675	$	11.15		509,575		920,741
August 1-31, 2011		278,385	$	10.72		788,060		642,356
September1-30, 2011		95,294	$	11.06		883,354		547,062

Item 3.

Defaults Upon Senior Securities

Not applicable.

Item 4.

[Removed and Reserved]

Item 5.

Other Information

Not applicable.

Item 6.

Exhibits

The following exhibits are either filed as part of this report or are incorporated herein by reference:

3.1

Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of First Connecticut Bancorp, Inc. (filed as Exhibit 3.1 to the Registration Statement on the Form S-1 filed for the Company on January 28, 2011, as amended, and incorporated herein by reference).

3.2

Bylaws of First Connecticut Bancorp, Inc. (filed as Exhibit 3.2 to the Registration Statement on the Form S-1 filed for the Company on January 28, 2011, as amended, and incorporated herein by reference).

4.1

Form of Common Stock Certificate of First Connecticut Bancorp, Inc. (filed as Exhibit 4.1 to the Registration Statement on the Form S-1 filed for the Company on January 28, 2011, as amended, and incorporated herein by reference).

10.1

Phantom Stock Plan of Farmington Bank (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Registration Statement on the Form S-1 filed for the Company on January 28, 2011, as amended, and incorporated herein by reference).

10.2

Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan of Farmington Bank (filed as Exhibit 10.2 to the Registration Statement on the Form S-1 filed for the Company on January 28, 2011, as amended, and incorporated herein by reference).

10.3

Voluntary Deferred Compensation Plan for Directors and Key Employees (filed as Exhibit 10.3 to the Registration Statement on the Form S-1 filed for the Company on January 28, 2011, as amended, and incorporated herein by reference).

10.4

First Amendment to Voluntary Deferred Compensation Plan for Directors and Key Employees (filed as Exhibit 10.4 to the Registration Statement on the Form S-1 filed for the Company on January 28, 2011, as amended, and incorporated herein by reference).

10.5

Voluntary Deferred Compensation Plan for Key Employees (filed as Exhibit 10.5 to the Registration Statement on the Form S-1 filed for the Company on January 28, 2011, as amended, and incorporated herein by reference).

10.6

Life Insurance Premium Reimbursement Agreement between Farmington Bank and John J. Patrick, Jr. (filed as Exhibit 10.6 to the Registration Statement on the Form S-1 filed for the Company on January 28, 2011, as amended, and incorporated herein by reference).

10.7

Life Insurance Premium Reimbursement Agreement between Farmington Bank and Gregory A. White (filed as Exhibit 10.7 to the Registration Statement on the Form S-1 filed for the Company on January 28, 2011, as amended, and incorporated herein by reference).

10.8

Farmington Savings Bank Defined Benefit Employees’ Pension Plan, as amended (filed as Exhibit 10.8 to the Registration Statement on the Form S-1 filed for the Company on January 28, 2011, as amended, and incorporated herein by reference).

10.9

Annual Incentive Compensation Plan (filed as Exhibit 10.9 to the Registration Statement on the Form S-1 filed for the Company on January 28, 2011, as amended, and incorporated herein by reference).

10.10

Supplemental Retirement Plan Participation Agreement between John J. Patrick, Jr. and Farmington Bank (filed as Exhibit 10.10 to the Registration Statement on the Form S-1 filed for the Company on January 28, 2011, as amended, and incorporated herein by reference).

10.11

Supplemental Retirement Plan Participation Agreement between Michael T. Schweighoffer and Farmington Bank (filed as Exhibit 10.11 to the Registration Statement on the Form S-1 filed for the Company on January 28, 2011, as amended, and incorporated herein by reference).

10.12

Supplemental Retirement Plan Participation Agreement between Gregory A. White and Farmington Bank (filed as Exhibit 10.12 to the Registration Statement on the Form S-1 filed for the Company on January 28, 2011, as amended, and incorporated herein by reference).

31.1

Certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, signed by the Company’s Chief Executive Officer.

31.2

Certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, signed by the Company’s Chief Financial Officer.

32.1

Written Statement pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, signed by the Company’s Chief Executive Officer.

32.2

Written Statement pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, signed by the Company’s Chief Financial Officer.

101

Interactive data files pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-t: (i) the Consolidated Statements of Condition, (ii) the Consolidated Statements of Operations, (iii) the Consolidated Statement of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity, (iv) the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, and (iv) Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements tagged as blocks of text and in detail.*

As provided in Rule 406T of Regulation S-T, this information is furnished and not filed for purposes of Sections 11 and 12 of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 18 of the Securities Act of 1934.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.


	FIRST CONNECTICUT BANCORP, INC.

Date: November 14, 2011	/s/ John J. Patrick
	John J. Patrick, Jr.
	Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer

Date: November 14, 2011	/s/ Gregory A. White
	Gregory A. White
	Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

Date: November 14, 2011	/s/ Kimberly Rozanski Ruppert
	Kimberly Rozanski Ruppert
	Senior Vice President and Principal Accounting Officer

First Connecticut Bancorp, Inc. - FORM 10-Q - November 14, 2011

Attached files

First Connecticut Bancorp, Inc. Reports