UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

þ		Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

o		Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

Commission File Number: 001-34849

THE CORPORATE EXECUTIVE BOARD COMPANY

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)		52-2056410 (I.R.S. Employer Identification Number)
1919 North Lynn Street Arlington, Virginia (Address of principal executive offices)		22209 (Zip Code)

(571) 303-3000
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Not applicable
(Former name, former address or former fiscal year, if changed since last report)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes þ No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large accelerated filer þ		Accelerated filer o		Non-accelerated filer o (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)		Smaller reporting company o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes o No þ

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.

The Company had 33,294,413 shares of common stock, par value $0.01 per share, outstanding at November 4, 2011.

 

 

THE CORPORATE EXECUTIVE BOARD COMPANY

INDEX TO FORM 10-Q

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION			3
Item 1. Financial Statements			3
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets			3
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income			4
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows			5
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)			6
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations			14
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk			22
Item 4. Controls and Procedures			22
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION			23
Item 1. Legal Proceedings			23
Item 1A. Risk Factors			23
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds			23
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities			23
Item 4. (Removed and Reserved)			23
Item 5. Other Information			23
Item 6. Exhibits			24
Exhibit 10.1
EX-31.1
EX-31.2
EX-32.1
EX-101 INSTANCE DOCUMENT
EX-101 SCHEMA DOCUMENT
EX-101 CALCULATION LINKBASE DOCUMENT
EX-101 LABELS LINKBASE DOCUMENT
EX-101 PRESENTATION LINKBASE DOCUMENT
EX-101 DEFINITION LINKBASE DOCUMENT

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1.		Financial Statements.

THE CORPORATE EXECUTIVE BOARD COMPANY

		September 30,				December 31,
		2011				2010
		(Unaudited)
Assets
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents		$	96,922			$	102,498
Marketable securities			3,314				10,114
Membership fees receivable, net			92,039				141,322
Deferred income taxes, net			17,594				18,727
Deferred incentive compensation			15,086				15,710
Prepaid expenses and other current assets			16,135				10,388
Total current assets			241,090				298,759
Deferred income taxes, net			39,222				43,524
Marketable securities			7,314				10,850
Property and equipment, net			81,922				83,140
Goodwill			32,275				29,266
Intangible assets, net			15,853				13,828
Other non-current assets			32,693				30,782
Total assets		$	450,369			$	510,149
Liabilities and stockholders’ equity
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities		$	35,661			$	52,439
Accrued incentive compensation			28,693				40,719
Deferred revenues			235,097				251,200
Total current liabilities			299,451				344,358
Deferred income taxes			1,833				679
Other liabilities			83,213				82,296
Total liabilities			384,497				427,333
Stockholders’ equity:
Common stock, par value $0.01; 100,000,000 shares authorized, 43,848,582 and 43,533,802 shares issued, and 33,294,413 and 34,322,055 shares outstanding at September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively			438				435
Additional paid-in capital			416,326				409,558
Retained earnings			320,302				300,030
Accumulated elements of other comprehensive income			1,021				1,714
Treasury stock, at cost, 10,554,169 and 9,211,747 shares at September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively			(672,215	)			(628,921	)
Total stockholders’ equity			65,872				82,816
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity		$	450,369			$	510,149

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

THE CORPORATE EXECUTIVE BOARD COMPANY

		Three months ended September 30,								Nine months ended September 30,
		2011				2010				2011				2010
Revenues		$	122,852			$	112,113			$	356,925			$	321,865
Costs and expenses:
Cost of services			41,892				40,071				126,199				112,866
Member relations and marketing			36,608				32,222				108,196				88,157
General and administrative			15,706				14,334				49,456				44,614
Depreciation and amortization			3,974				4,517				12,820				15,291
Impairment loss			—				12,645				—				12,645
Total costs and expenses			98,180				103,789				296,671				273,573
Income from operations			24,672				8,324				60,254				48,292
Other (expense) income, net			(2,545	)			3,125				(717	)			1,878
Income before provision for income taxes			22,127				11,449				59,537				50,170
Provision for income taxes			8,121				4,460				23,833				20,568
Net income		$	14,006			$	6,989			$	35,704			$	29,602
Earnings per share:
Basic		$	0.41			$	0.20			$	1.04			$	0.87
Diluted		$	0.41			$	0.20			$	1.03			$	0.86
Dividends per share		$	0.15			$	0.11			$	0.45			$	0.33
Weighted average shares outstanding:
Basic			34,134				34,292				34,299				34,211
Diluted			34,381				34,532				34,648				34,488

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

THE CORPORATE EXECUTIVE BOARD COMPANY

		Nine months ended
		September 30,
		2011				2010
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income		$	35,704			$	29,602
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash flows provided by operating activities:
Impairment loss			—				12,645
Depreciation and amortization			12,820				15,291
Deferred income taxes			4,027				(6,039	)
Share-based compensation			6,144				5,301
Excess tax benefits from share-based compensation arrangements			(1,821	)			—
Foreign currency translation gain			(70	)			—
Amortization of marketable securities premiums, net			166				288
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Membership fees receivable, net			50,169				39,337
Deferred incentive compensation			520				(1,655	)
Prepaid expenses and other current assets			(5,812	)			(652	)
Other non-current assets			(1,172	)			(4,001	)
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities			(15,251	)			(21,287	)
Accrued incentive compensation			(12,227	)			1,352
Deferred revenues			(16,036	)			(29,464	)
Other liabilities			920				6,421
Net cash flows provided by operating activities			58,081				47,139
Cash flows from investing activities:
Purchases of property and equipment			(7,641	)			(4,225	)
Acquisition of business, net of cash acquired			(5,791	)			(12,957	)
Cost method investment			(150	)			—
Maturities of marketable securities			9,845				22,382
Net cash flows (used in) provided by investing activities			(3,737	)			5,200
Cash flows from financing activities:
Proceeds from the exercise of common stock options			1,587				—
Proceeds from the issuance of common stock under the employee stock purchase plan			369				333
Excess tax benefits from share-based compensation arrangements			1,821				—
Acquisition of business, contingent consideration			(3,655	)			—
Credit facility issuance costs			(542	)			—
Purchases of treasury shares			(43,295	)			(1,225	)
Payment of dividends			(15,430	)			(11,283	)
Net cash flows used in financing activities			(59,145	)			(12,175	)
Effect of exchange rates on cash			(775	)			—
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents			(5,576	)			40,164
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period			102,498				31,760
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period		$	96,922			$	71,924

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

THE CORPORATE EXECUTIVE BOARD COMPANY

Note 1. Nature of business and basis of presentation

The Corporate Executive Board Company (the “Company”) provides essential information by analyzing and disseminating the most successful practices from its global network of members. The Company drives corporate performance through a network of executives and business professionals by providing actionable insights, analytical tools, and advisory support to quickly and confidently focus efforts on what executives and their teams need to know, and do, next. The Company provides its members with the authoritative and timely decision support they need to elevate company performance and excel in their careers. For an annual fee, members of each program have access to an integrated set of products and services, including best practices studies, executive education, customized analysis, proprietary databases and decision support tools. The Company also generates advertising and content related revenues through its wholly-owned subsidiary, Toolbox.com, LLC. (“Toolbox.com”).

The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared by the Company in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) for interim financial information and pursuant to the rules and regulations of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) for reporting on Form 10-Q. Accordingly, certain information and disclosures required for complete consolidated financial statements are not included. It is recommended that these condensed consolidated financial statements be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and related notes in the Company’s 2010 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

In management’s opinion, all adjustments, consisting of a normal recurring nature, considered necessary for a fair presentation of the condensed consolidated financial position, results of operations, and cash flows at the dates and for the periods presented have been included. The condensed consolidated balance sheet presented at December 31, 2010 has been derived from the financial statements that were audited by the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm. The results of operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011 may not be indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ended December 31, 2011 or any other period within 2011.

Note 2. Summary of significant accounting policies

Except to the extent updated or described below, a detailed description of the Company’s significant accounting policies is included in the Company’s 2010 Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on February 28, 2011. The following notes should be read in conjunction with such policies and other disclosures contained therein.

Revenue Recognition

The Company generates the majority of its revenues from three primary service offerings: executive memberships, performance analytics, and leadership academies. Executive memberships generally contain multiple deliverables, which are determined based upon the availability and delivery method of the services and may include: on-line best practices research and insights, peer benchmarks, decision and diagnostics tools, advisory support, and live and on-line learning events. Performance analytics deliver data and analytical insight to drive improved performance of executives and their teams and are accounted for as service revenues. Leadership academies generally contain multiple deliverables and provide access to training and development services that may include diagnostic reports, learning portal access, classroom-based development sessions, webinars, and virtual office hours with faculty.

In October 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2009-13, “Multiple Deliverable Revenue Arrangements” (“ASU 2009-13”) that is effective for revenue arrangements entered into or materially modified in fiscal years beginning on or after June 15, 2010. This guidance eliminates the residual method under previous guidance and replaces it with the “relative selling price” method when allocating revenue in a multiple deliverable arrangement. The Company adopted ASU 2009-13 prospectively on January 1, 2011.

When service offerings include multiple deliverables that qualify as separate units of accounting, the Company allocates arrangement consideration at the inception of the contract period to all deliverables based on the relative selling price method in accordance with the selling price hierarchy, which includes vendor specific objective evidence (“VSOE”) if available; third-party evidence (“TPE”) if VSOE is not available; or best estimate of selling price (“BESP”) if neither VSOE nor TPE is available.

•

VSOE. The Company determines VSOE based on established pricing and discounting practices for the specific service when sold separately. In determining VSOE, the Company requires that a substantial majority of the selling prices for these services fall within a reasonably narrow pricing range. The Company limits its assessment of VSOE for each element to either the price charged when the same element is sold separately, or the price established by management having the relevant authority to do so for an element not yet sold separately.

•

TPE. When VSOE cannot be established for deliverables in multiple element arrangements, the Company applies judgment with respect to whether it can establish a selling price based on TPE. TPE is determined based on competitor prices for similar services when sold separately. Generally, the Company’s services contain a significant level of differentiation such that the comparable pricing of services with similar functionality cannot be obtained. Furthermore, the Company is unable to reliably determine what similar competitors’ selling prices are for similar services on a stand-alone basis. As a result, the Company has not been able to establish selling price based on TPE.

•

BESP. When unable to establish a selling price using VSOE or TPE, the Company uses BESP in its allocation of arrangement consideration. The objective of BESP is to determine the price at which the Company would transact a sale if the product or service were sold on a stand-alone basis. The Company determines BESP for deliverables by considering multiple factors including, but not limited to, prices it charges for similar offerings, market conditions, competitive landscape and pricing practices.

Revenue is recognized when (1) there is persuasive evidence of an arrangement, (2) the fee is fixed and determinable, (3) services have been rendered and payment has been contractually earned, and (4) collectability is reasonably assured. Certain fees are billed on an installment basis. Customers generally may request a refund of their fees, which is provided from the date of the refund request on a pro-rata basis relative to the length of the remaining term, under the Company’s service guarantee.

•

Executive memberships. In general, the majority of the deliverables within the Company’s memberships are consistently available throughout the membership period. Revenues are generally recognized ratably over the term of the related agreement, which is typically 12 months. Membership fees are billable, and revenue recognition begins, when a member agrees to the terms of the membership and the fees receivable and the related deferred revenue are recorded upon the commencement of the agreement or collection of fees, if earlier. In some instances, a membership may include a service that is available only once, or on a limited basis, during the membership period. These services are separated from the remainder of the membership and arrangement consideration is allocated based on VSOE, if available, or BESP. The consideration allocated to services available only once or on a limited basis is recognized as revenue upon the earlier of the delivery of the service or the completion of the contract period, provided that all other criteria for recognition have been met. The arrangement consideration allocated to the remainder of the membership services continues to be recognized ratably.

•

Performance analytics. Revenues are generally recognized ratably from the date services begin, which is primarily after the design of the service outputs, through the completion of the services.

•

Leadership academies. Revenues are generally recognized as services are completed. The service offering generally includes one or more class-room based training or presentation events. If more than one delivery date is evident, arrangement consideration is allocated on a pro-rata basis and revenue is recognized on the delivery date of each event.

Agreements entered into between January 1, 2011 and September 30, 2011, and impacted by ASU 2009-13 have resulted in lower results of operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011 than would have been reported under the previous guidance. Revenues and income from operations were lower by $2.5 million and $6.1 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011, respectively. Net income was lower by $1.6 million and $3.7 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011, respectively. Basic and diluted earnings per share were lower by $0.05 and $0.11 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011, respectively.

To lessen the impact of ASU 2009-13, the Company completed modifications to certain memberships to remove or alter services that were available only once, or on a limited basis, during the membership period. These modifications were completed on or about March 31, 2011. The modifications will allow the Company to recognize revenue for executive memberships ratably over the term of the related agreement for sales on or after April 1, 2011. For memberships that have not been modified, the Company has and will continue to allocate arrangement consideration to all services. For services that are available only once, or on a limited basis, revenues are recognized upon the earlier of the delivery of the service or the completion of the membership period.

Advertising and content related revenues from Toolbox.com are recognized as the services are provided.

Note 3. Recent accounting pronouncements

Recently adopted

In January 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-06, “Improving Disclosures about Fair Value Measurements” to require additional disclosures about purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements in the rollforward of Level 3 fair value measurements. The adoption of this new accounting guidance in the first quarter of 2011 did not have a material impact on the consolidated financial statements.

The Company adopted ASU 2009-13 on January 1, 2011 as discussed above.

Not yet adopted

In May 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-04, “Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in U.S. GAAP and IFRS.” The ASU is the result of joint efforts by the FASB and International Accounting Standards Board to develop a single, converged fair value framework on how (not when) to measure fair value and what disclosures to provide about fair value measurements. While the ASU is largely consistent with existing fair value measurement principles in U.S. GAAP, it modifies Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 820, “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures” (“ASC 820”) to expand existing disclosure requirements for fair value measurements and makes other amendments. This ASU is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2011. The Company is in the process of assessing this new guidance but the adoption of this ASU is not expected to have a material impact on the consolidated financial statements.

In June 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-05, “Presentation of Comprehensive Income.” This ASU revises the manner in which entities present comprehensive income in their financial statements. The new guidance removes the presentation options in ASC Topic 220, “Comprehensive Income” and requires entities to report components of comprehensive income in either (1) a continuous statement of comprehensive income or (2) two separate but consecutive statements. The ASU does not change the items that must be reported in other comprehensive income. This ASU is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2011. The adoption of this ASU is not expected to have a material impact on the consolidated financial statements.

In September 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-08 “Testing Goodwill for Impairment.” This ASU allows entities to first assess qualitatively whether it is necessary to perform the two-step goodwill impairment test. If an entity believes, as a result of its qualitative assessment, that it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount, the quantitative two-step goodwill impairment test is required. An entity has the unconditional option to bypass the qualitative assessment and proceed directly to performing the first step of the goodwill impairment test. This ASU is effective for goodwill impairment tests performed in interim and annual periods for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2011. The Company does not expect this guidance will have a material impact on its financial statements.

Note 4. Acquisitions

On September 30, 2011 the Company completed the acquisition of Baumgartner & Partner GmbH (“Baumgartner”), a German services firm that provides human resources and finance data and benchmarking services, as well as human resources advisory services. The Company acquired 100% of the equity interests for an initial cash payment of $6.0 million less cash acquired of $1.0 million. The Company allocated $4.1 million to intangible assets with a weighted average amortization period of 5 years and $3.2 million to goodwill. The Company also will be required to pay an additional $1.5 million less any amounts that the Company is entitled to retain to reimburse it for any losses that are subject to indemnification by the sellers, at various times prior to September 30, 2013.

In May 2010, the Company completed the acquisition of Iconoculture, Inc., a Minnesota corporation (now doing business as Iconoculture LLC, or “Iconoculture”). Iconoculture provides comprehensive consumer insights and effective strategic marketing advisory services and project support to an established customer base. The Company acquired 100% of the equity interests of Iconoculture for an initial cash payment of $16.2 million, less cash acquired totaling $7.2 million, plus a working capital adjustment of $4.0 million paid in July 2010. The Company also paid $1.5 million on April 1, 2011, which had been held back by the Company for any indemnifiable losses under the terms of the acquisition agreement. In addition, the Company paid $2.5 million on April 1, 2011 as final settlement of the additional consideration associated with Iconoculture’s financial performance against certain specified targets for the year ended December 31, 2010. The acquisition date fair value of the total consideration was $24.2 million and was allocated to the assets acquired, including intangible assets and liabilities assumed, based on their estimated fair values. The Company allocated $9.2 million to intangible assets with a weighted average amortization period of 4.5 years and $11.0 million to goodwill.

Note 5. Impairment of goodwill and intangible assets

In the three months ended September 30, 2010, the Company concluded there were impairment indicators relating to the 2007 acquisition of Toolbox.com based on a combination of factors (including the then current economic environment and the near term outlook for advertising related revenue). The Company completed an impairment test at August 31, 2010 and concluded that goodwill and intangible asset amounts were impaired. The total pre-tax impairment loss recognized in the three months ended September 30, 2010 was $12.6 million ($9.5 million related to goodwill and $3.1 million related to intangible assets). This non-cash charge did not impact the Company’s liquidity position or cash flows.

The Company utilized the income approach (discounted cash flow method) and the market approach (guideline company method) in the determination of the fair value. Significant assumptions used included: expected revenue growth rates, reporting unit profit margins, and working capital levels; a discount rate of 19%; and a terminal value based upon long-term growth assumptions. The expected future revenue growth rates and profit margins were determined after taking into consideration historical revenue growth rates and profit margins, the Company’s assessment of future market potential, and the Company’s expectations of future business performance.

Note 6. Fair value measurements

Measurements

Fair value is defined as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. There is a three-level fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs used to measure fair value. This hierarchy requires entities to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs. The three levels of inputs used to measure fair value are as follows:

•

Level 1 — Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.

•

Level 2 — Observable inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1, such as quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar assets and liabilities in markets that are not active, or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data.

•

Level 3 — Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities. This includes certain pricing models, discounted cash flow methodologies and similar techniques that use significant unobservable inputs.

The Company has segregated all assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis into the most appropriate level within the fair value hierarchy based on the inputs used to determine the fair value at the measurement date in the tables below (in thousands):

		September 30, 2011												December 31, 2010
		Level 1				Level 2				Level 3				Level 1				Level 2				Level 3
Financial assets
Cash and cash equivalents		$	96,922			$	—			$	—			$	102,498			$	—			$	—
Debt securities issued by the District of Columbia			10,628				—				—				20,964				—				—
Variable insurance products held in a Rabbi Trust			—				13,234				—				—				14,905				—
Forward currency exchange contracts			—				9				—				—				232				—
Financial liabilities
Forward currency exchange contracts		$	—			$	455			$	—			$	—			$	113			$	—
Contingent consideration — Iconoculture			—				—				—				—				—				1,900

The fair value of variable insurance products held in a Rabbi Trust is based on actuarial estimates derived from various observable market inputs. The fair value of foreign currency exchange contracts are based on bank quotations for similar instruments using models with market-based inputs.

The fair value estimate of the Iconoculture contingent consideration was $1.9 million at December 31, 2010. In March 2011, the Company increased its estimate of contingent consideration to $2.5 million. On April 1, 2011, the Company paid $2.5 million as final settlement of the additional consideration associated with Iconoculture’s financial performance against certain specified targets for the year ended December 31, 2010.

Certain assets (i.e., goodwill, intangible assets) and liabilities are measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis; that is, the assets and liabilities are not measured at fair value on an ongoing basis but are subject to fair value adjustments in certain circumstances (e.g., when there is impairment). No fair value adjustments were made in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively.

Marketable securities

The aggregate fair value, amortized cost, gross unrealized gains, and gross unrealized losses on available-for-sale marketable securities are as follows (in thousands):

		September 30, 2011
										Gross				Gross
		Fair				Amortized				Unrealized				Unrealized
		Value				Cost				Gains				Losses
Washington D.C. tax exempt bonds		$	10,628			$	10,254			$	374			$	—

		December 31, 2010
										Gross				Gross
		Fair				Amortized				Unrealized				Unrealized
		Value				Cost				Gains				Losses
Washington D.C. tax exempt bonds		$	20,964			$	20,265			$	699			$	—

The following table summarizes maturities of marketable securities (in thousands):

		September 30, 2011
		Fair				Amortized
		Value				Cost
Less than one year		$	3,314			$	3,233
Matures in 1 to 5 years			7,314				7,021
Marketable securities		$	10,628			$	10,254

Note 7. Other liabilities

Other liabilities consist of the following (in thousands):

		September 30,				December 31,
		2011				2010
Deferred compensation		$	10,231			$	11,215
Lease incentives			30,533				31,619
Deferred rent benefit			25,525				23,079
Other			16,924				16,383
Total other liabilities		$	83,213			$	82,296

Note 8. Stockholders’ equity and share-based compensation

Share Repurchases

In August 2011, the Company’s Board of Directors authorized a share repurchase of up to an additional $50 million of the Company’s common stock.  Repurchases will be made from time to time in open market and privately negotiated transactions subject to market conditions. No minimum number of shares has been fixed. The Company has funded, and expects to continue to fund, its share repurchases with cash on hand and cash generated from operations. For the nine months ended September 30, 2011, the Company repurchased approximately 1.3 million shares at a total cost of approximately $43.3 million. The remaining share repurchase authorization was $28.1 million at September 30, 2011.

Share-based compensation

The Company granted 293,470 and 396,310 restricted stock units at a weighted-average fair value of $38.85 and $25.63 in the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. Share-based compensation expense is recognized on a straight line basis, net of an estimated forfeiture rate, for those shares expected to vest over the requisite service period of the award, which is generally the vesting term of four years. Approximately 12,000 and 228,000 shares were issued relating to the vesting of restricted stock units and exercise of stock options in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011, respectively. Approximately 16,000 and 244,000 shares were issued relating to the vesting of restricted stock units and exercise of stock options in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010, respectively.

The Company recognized total share-based compensation costs of $2.0 million and $2.1 million in the three months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010 and $6.1 million and $5.3 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. At September 30, 2011, there was $19.1 million of total unrecognized share-based compensation cost.

Dividends

In August 2011, the Board of Directors declared a cash dividend of $0.15 per share for the third quarter of 2011 for stockholders of record on September 15, 2011. The dividend, totaling $5.0 million, was paid on September 30, 2011.

On November 4, 2011, the Board of Directors declared a fourth quarter cash dividend of $0.15 per share. The dividend is payable on December 30, 2011 to stockholders of record at the close of business on December 15, 2011. The Company funds its dividend payments with cash on hand and cash generated from operations.

Note 9. Derivative instruments and hedging activities

The Company’s international operations are subject to risks related to currency exchange fluctuations. Prices for the Company’s products and services are denominated primarily in United States dollars (“USD”), including products and services sold to members that are located outside the United States. Many of the costs associated with the Company’s operations located outside the United States are denominated in local currencies. As a consequence, increases in local currencies against the USD in countries where the Company has foreign operations would result in higher effective operating costs and reduced earnings. The Company uses forward contracts, designated as cash flow hedging instruments, to protect against foreign currency exchange rate risks inherent with its cost reimbursement agreements with its United Kingdom subsidiary. A forward contract obligates the Company to exchange a predetermined amount of USD to make equivalent British pound sterling (“GBP”) payments equal to the value of such exchanges.

The Company formally documents all relationships between hedging instruments and hedged items as well as its risk management objective and strategy for undertaking hedge transactions. The maximum length of time over which the Company is hedging its exposure to the variability in future cash flows is 12 months. The forward contracts are recognized on the consolidated balance sheets at fair value and changes in fair value measurements are reflected as adjustments to other comprehensive income (“OCI”) until such time as the actual foreign currency expenditures are made and the unrealized gain/loss is reclassified from accumulated OCI to current earnings. There is generally no or an immaterial amount of ineffectiveness. The notional amount of outstanding forward contracts was $21.0 million at September 30, 2011.

The fair value of derivative instruments, which are designated as hedging instruments, on the Company’s condensed consolidated balance sheets are as follows (in thousands):

Balance Sheet Location		September 30, 2011				December 31, 2010
Asset Derivatives
Prepaid expenses and other current assets		$	9			$	232
Liability Derivatives
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities		$	455			$	113

The pre-tax effect of the derivative instruments on the Company’s consolidated statements of income is as follows (in thousands):

		Amount of Gain (Loss) Recognized in OCI on Derivative (Effective portion)
		Three Months Ended September 30,								Nine months Ended September 30,
Derivatives in Cash Flow Hedging Relationships		2011				2010				2011				2010
Forward currency contracts		$	(331	)		$	557			$	187			$	195

Location of Gain (Loss) Reclassified from		Amount of Gain (Loss) Reclassified from Accumulated OCI into Income (Effective portion)
Accumulated OCI into Income (Effective		Three Months Ended September 30,								Nine months Ended September 30,
portion)		2011				2010				2011				2010
Cost of services		$	(34	)		$	95			$	278			$	(51	)
Member relations and marketing			(28	)			186				237				(101	)
General and administrative			(14	)			45				113				(25	)
		$	(76	)		$	326			$	628			$	(177	)

Note 10. Revolving credit facility

On March 16, 2011, the Company, together with certain of its subsidiaries acting as guarantors, entered into a $100 million five-year senior unsecured, revolving credit facility (the “Credit Facility”) with certain lenders, including Bank of America, N.A., as Administrative Agent, Swing Line Lender and L/C Issuer, and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as Syndication Agent. The Credit Facility contains letter of credit and swing line loan sub-facilities and has a maturity date of March 16, 2016.

The Credit Facility is available for working capital and general corporate purposes. Under the terms of the Credit Facility, the Company has the right, from time to time, to increase the aggregate revolving commitments from $100 million up to a maximum $150 million upon at least five business days prior written notice to the Administrative Agent, subject to certain limitations set forth in the Credit Facility, including the absence of a default under the Credit Facility. The Company has issued letters of credit under the Credit Facility in an aggregate amount of $7.2 million at September 30, 2011 and has otherwise not borrowed under the Credit Facility.

Borrowings under the Credit Facility bear interest at rates based on the ratio of the Company’s consolidated indebtedness to consolidated EBITDA (earnings before interest income, net, depreciation and amortization, and provision for income taxes.) for applicable periods specified in the Credit Facility (the “Consolidated Leverage Ratio”). Such rates are tied to the highest of the federal funds rate, Bank of America’s prime rate and LIBOR, or to LIBOR, depending on the type of loan.

The Company must pay the Administrative Agent a quarterly commitment fee based upon the amount by which the aggregate revolving commitments exceed the outstanding loans and obligations of the Company under the Credit Facility. Additionally, the Company must pay the lenders certain letter of credit fees based upon the daily amount available to be drawn under such letters of credit. The commitment fee and letter of credit fees vary based on the Consolidated Leverage Ratio.

The Credit Facility also contains customary financial and other covenants, including limitations on the ability of the Company and its subsidiaries to incur debt or liens or make certain investments and restricted payments, a requirement to maintain certain leverage and interest coverage ratios, and certain restrictions on the sale of assets and capital expenditures. A violation of these covenants could result in the Company being prohibited from making certain restricted payments, including dividends, or cause a default under the Credit Facility, which would permit the participating lenders to restrict the Company’s ability to access the Credit Facility and require the immediate repayment of any outstanding advances made under it.

Note 11. Income taxes

The Company computes its provision for income taxes by applying the estimated annual effective tax rate to income from operations and adjusts the provision for discrete tax items recorded in the period. The effective tax rate was 36.7% and 40.0% in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011, respectively. The effective tax rate for the three months ended September 30, 2011 includes the effect of a discrete event related to the release of a tax contingency reserve to reflect the lapse of a statute of limitations which resulted in a decrease to the effective tax rate. The Company currently anticipates a full-year expected annualized tax rate of approximately 40%, excluding the effects of unrealized currency translation gains and losses. The effective tax rate was 39.0% and 41.0% in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010, respectively.

The Company made income tax payments of $7.2 million and $9.1 million in the three months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010 and $27.8 million and $27.3 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively.

Note 12. Earnings per share

A reconciliation of basic to diluted weighted average common shares outstanding is as follows (in thousands):

		Three months ended September 30,								Nine months ended September 30,
		2011				2010				2011				2010
Basic weighted average common shares outstanding			34,134				34,292				34,299				34,211
Dilutive effect of common shares outstanding			247				240				349				277
Diluted weighted average common shares outstanding			34,381				34,532				34,648				34,488

Approximately 1.8 million and 2.4 million shares in the three months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively, and approximately 1.9 million and 2.5 million shares in the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively, have been excluded from the dilutive effect shown above because their impact would be anti-dilutive. These shares related to share-based compensation awards.

Note 13. Comprehensive income

Total comprehensive income is as follows (in thousands):

		Three months ended September 30,								Nine months ended September 30,
		2011				2010				2011				2010
Net income		$	14,006			$	6,989			$	35,704			$	29,602
Change in unrealized gains of marketable securities, net of tax			(47	)			(71	)			(195	)			(317	)
Unrealized (losses) gains on forward contracts, net of tax			(153	)			122				(263	)			216
Change in cumulative translation adjustment			(242	)			(136	)			(234	)			580
Total comprehensive income		$	13,564			$	6,904			$	35,012			$	30,081

Accumulated elements of other comprehensive income at September 30, 2011 consist primarily of a $1.0 million cumulative foreign currency translation gain. Accumulated elements of other comprehensive income at December 31, 2010 consists of a $0.4 million unrealized gain, net of tax, on marketable securities; a $0.1 million unrealized gain, net of tax, on forward currency exchange contracts; and a $1.2 million cumulative foreign currency translation gain.

Note 14. Commitments and contingencies

Operating leases

The Company leases office facilities that expire on various dates through 2028. Generally, the leases carry renewal provisions and rental escalations and require the Company to pay executory costs such as taxes and insurance.

Future minimum rental payments under non-cancelable operating leases and future minimum receipts under subleases, excluding executory costs, are as follows at September 30, 2011:

		Total				2011*				YE 2012				YE 2013				YE 2014				YE 2015				Thereafter
Operating lease obligations		$	584,715			$	9,012			$	36,579			$	36,801			$	36,532			$	36,839			$	428,952
Sublease receipts			(272,889	)			(3,079	)			(13,997	)			(14,306	)			(13,383	)			(14,954	)			(213,170	)
Total net lease obligations		$	311,826			$	5,933			$	22,582			$	22,495			$	23,149			$	21,885			$	215,782

Contingencies

From time to time, the Company is subject to litigation related to normal business operations. The Company vigorously defends itself in litigation and is not currently a party to, and the Company’s property is not subject to, any legal proceedings likely to materially affect the Company’s financial results.

The Company continues to evaluate potential tax exposures relating to sales and use, payroll, income and property tax laws, and regulations for various states in which the Company sells or supports its goods and services. Accruals for potential contingencies are recorded by the Company when it is probable that a liability has been incurred and the liability can be reasonably estimated. As additional information becomes available, changes in the estimates of the liability are reported in the period that those changes occur. The Company has a $3.0 million liability at September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively, relating to certain sales and use tax regulations for states in which the Company sells or supports its goods and services.

Item 2.		Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

The following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with our condensed consolidated financial statements and related notes thereto included elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. The following discussion includes forward-looking statements that involve certain risks and uncertainties. For additional information regarding forward-looking statements and risk factors, see “Forward-looking statements.”

Executive Overview

In 2011, our objective is to continue to build on what we believe is a strong foundation for long-term profitable growth. To do that, we intend to deepen existing member relationships, add high-value new member companies, and leverage the member platform to launch new products and services. With the goal of making continued progress with these growth levers, our four operating priorities for 2011 are to create uniquely valuable insights into corporate performance; drive loyalty, growth, and brand strength through high value member engagement; invest globally in key markets; and leverage technology and service to deliver innovative products.

Our performance through September 30, 2011 reflects continued progress on elements of our growth strategy. Contract Value, which we define as the aggregate annualized revenues attributed to all agreements in effect at a given date without regard to the remaining duration of any such agreement, was $472.2 million at September 30, 2011, an increase of 12.0%, compared to $421.6 million at September 30, 2010, as a result of increased sales to new and existing members. Contract Value per member institution increased 4.4% at September 30, 2011 to $85,804 from $82,176 at September 30, 2010.

We believe that member-based operating metrics provide a useful view of the true economics, management, and growth trends in our business. Wallet retention rate, which we define as the total current year Contract Value from prior year members as a percentage of the total prior year Contract Value, increased to 102% at September 30, 2011 from 96% at September 30, 2010 as a result of improved pricing, renewals, and sales of additional products and services. We believe that Wallet Retention Rate provides an integrated view of member buying activity as it reflects the cumulative year-over-year impact of renewals, cross sales, and pricing growth.

Revenues were $122.9 million in the three months ended September 30, 2011, an increase of $10.8 million from the three months ended September 30, 2010. Total costs and expenses were $98.2 million in the three months ended September 30, 2011, a decrease of $5.6 million from the three months ended September 30, 2010 primarily due to the $12.6 million impairment loss in the prior year offset by higher operating costs and additional investments in new products and market extensions to further enhance organic growth. Our EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA margins were 21.1% in the three months ended September 30, 2011 compared to EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA margins of 14.0% and 25.2%, respectively, in the three months ended September 30, 2010. As a result, net income and Adjusted net income were $14.0 million in the three months ended September 30, 2011 compared to $7.0 million and $14.8 million, respectively, in the three months ended September 30, 2010.

Revenues were $356.9 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2011, an increase of $35.0 million from the nine months ended September 30, 2010. Total costs and expenses were $296.7 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2011, an increase of $23.1 million from the nine months ended September 30, 2010 primarily due to higher operating costs and additional investments in new products and market extensions to further enhance organic growth partially offset by the $12.6 million impairment loss in the prior year. Our EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA margins were 20.1% in the nine months ended September 30, 2011 compared to EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA margins of 20.0% and 23.9%, respectively, in the nine months ended September 30, 2010. As a result, net income and Adjusted net income were $35.7 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2011 compared to $29.6 million and $37.4 million, respectively, in the nine months ended September 30, 2010.

Non-GAAP Financial Measures

The tables below, as well as earnings discussions, may include a discussion of EBITDA, Adjusted EBITDA, Adjusted net income, and Non-GAAP diluted earnings per share, which are non-GAAP financial measures provided as a complement to the results provided in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”). The term “EBITDA” refers to a financial measure that we define as earnings before interest income, net, depreciation and amortization, and provision for income taxes. The term “Adjusted EBITDA” refers to a financial measure that we define as earnings before interest income, net, depreciation and amortization, provision for income taxes, impairment loss, costs associated with exit activities, restructuring costs, and gain on acquisition. The term “Adjusted net income” refers to net income excluding the after tax effects of impairment loss, costs associated with exit activities, restructuring costs, and gain on acquisition. “Non-GAAP diluted earnings per share” refers to diluted earnings per share excluding the after tax per share effects of impairment loss, costs associated with exit activities, restructuring costs, and gain on acquisition.

These non-GAAP measures may be considered in addition to results prepared in accordance with GAAP, but they should not be considered a substitute for, or superior to, GAAP results. We intend to continue to provide these non-GAAP financial measures as part of our future earnings discussions and, therefore, the inclusion of these non-GAAP financial measures will provide consistency in our financial reporting.

We believe that EBITDA, Adjusted EBITDA, Adjusted net income, and Non-GAAP diluted earnings per share are relevant and useful supplemental information for our investors. We use these non-GAAP financial measures for internal budgeting and other managerial purposes, when publicly providing the Company’s business outlook and as a measurement for potential acquisitions. A limitation associated with EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA is that they do not reflect the periodic costs of certain capitalized tangible and intangible assets used in generating revenues in our business. Management evaluates the costs of such tangible and intangible assets through other financial measures such as capital expenditures. Management compensates for these limitations by also relying on the comparable GAAP financial measure of Income from operations, which includes depreciation and amortization.

A reconciliation of these non-GAAP measures to GAAP results is provided below (in thousands):

		Three Months Ended								Nine Months Ended
		September 30,								September 30,
		2011				2010				2011				2010
Net income		$	14,006			$	6,989			$	35,704			$	29,602
Interest income, net			(146	)			(317	)			(644	)			(1,116	)
Depreciation and amortization			3,974				4,517				12,820				15,291
Provision for income taxes			8,121				4,460				23,833				20,568
EBITDA		$	25,955			$	15,649			$	71,713			$	64,345
Impairment loss			—				12,645				—				12,645
Adjusted EBITDA		$	25,955			$	28,294			$	71,713			$	76,990

		Three Months Ended								Nine Months Ended
		September 30,								September 30,
		2011				2010				2011				2010
Net income		$	14,006			$	6,989			$	35,704			$	29,602
Adjustments, net of tax:
Impairment loss			—				7,789				—				7,789
Adjusted net income		$	14,006			$	14,778			$	35,704			$	37,391

		Three Months Ended								Nine Months Ended
		September 30,								September 30,
		2011				2010				2011				2010
GAAP diluted earnings per share		$	0.41			$	0.20			$	1.03			$	0.86
Adjustments, net of tax:
Impairment loss			—				0.23				—				0.23
Non-GAAP diluted earnings per share		$	0.41			$	0.43			$	1.03			$	1.09

Critical Accounting Policies

Our accounting policies require us to apply methodologies, estimates and judgments that have a significant impact on the results we report in our consolidated financial statements. In our 2010 Annual Report on Form 10-K, we discussed those material policies that we believe are critical and require the use of complex judgment in their application. There have been no changes to our critical accounting policies since that time other than discussed below.

On January 1, 2011, we prospectively adopted Accounting Standards Update 2009-13, “Multiple-Deliverable Revenue Arrangements” (“ASU 2009-13”), which is discussed in Note 2 to the condensed consolidated financial statements. In response to the adoption of ASU 2009-13, we must analyze our service offerings to determine if there are multiple deliverables. If there are multiple deliverables in our service offerings, we must account for them as separate units of accounting. Measuring and allocating arrangement consideration to separate units of accounting requires the application of judgment by management. The adoption of ASU 2009-13 has affected the timing of revenue recognition. For services that are available only once, or on a limited basis, revenues are recognized upon the earlier of the delivery of the service or the completion of the membership period.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

See Note 3 to the condensed consolidated financial statements for a discussion of recent accounting pronouncements.

Results of Operations

We generate the majority of our revenues through memberships that provide access to our products and services, which are delivered through several channels. Memberships, which principally are annually renewable agreements, primarily are payable by members at the beginning of the contract term. Billings attributable to memberships for our products and services initially are recorded as deferred revenues and then generally are recognized on a pro-rata basis over the membership contract term, which typically is 12 months. Generally, a member may request a refund of its membership fee during the membership term under our service guarantee. Refunds are provided from the date of the refund request on a pro-rata basis relative to the remaining term of the membership.

Our operating costs and expenses consist of:

•

Cost of services, which represents the costs associated with the production and delivery of our products and services, consisting of compensation, including salaries, variable, and share-based compensation, and for research personnel, in-house faculty, and product advisors; the organization and delivery of membership meetings, seminars, and other events; ongoing product development costs; production of published materials, costs of developing and supporting our membership web platform and digital delivery of products and services; and associated support services.

•

Member relations and marketing, which represents the costs of acquiring new members and the costs of account management, consisting of compensation, including salaries, sales incentives, and share-based compensation; travel and related expenses; recruiting and training of personnel; sales and marketing materials; and associated support services, as well as the costs of maintaining our customer relationship management software.

•

General and administrative, which represents the costs associated with the corporate and administrative functions, including human resources and recruiting, finance and accounting, legal, management information systems, facilities management, business development and other. Costs include compensation, including salaries, variable, and share-based compensation; third-party consulting and compliance expenses; and associated support services.

•

Depreciation and amortization, consisting of depreciation of our property and equipment, including leasehold improvements, furniture, fixtures and equipment, capitalized software and Web site development costs and the amortization of intangible assets.

Three and Nine months Ended September 30, 2011 Compared to the Three and Nine months Ended September 30, 2010

Revenues

Revenues increased 9.6% to $122.9 million in the three months ended September 30, 2011 from $112.1 million in the three months ended September 30, 2010. Revenues increased 10.9% to $356.9 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2010 from $321.9 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2010.

The increase of $10.8 million for the three months ended September 30, 2011 compared to the same period in the prior year was due to an increase in sales bookings to new and existing members throughout 2010 and the first nine months of 2011. This increase is net of a $2.5 million revenue deferral resulting from the adoption of ASU 2009-13 prospectively.

The increase of $35.0 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2011 compared to the same period in the prior year was due to an increase in sales bookings to new and existing members throughout 2010 and the first nine months of 2011. This increase is net of a $6.1 million revenue deferral resulting from the adoption of ASU 2009-13 prospectively.

Costs and expenses

Increases in compensation and the impact of changes in the exchange rates of the U.S. Dollar (“USD”) to the British pound sterling (“GBP”) and the Indian Rupee (“INR”) all contributed to the year-over-year increases in costs and expenses. These items are allocated to Cost of services, Member relations and marketing, and General and administrative expenses. We discuss these major components of costs and expenses on an aggregated basis below:

•

Compensation and related costs, including salaries and payroll taxes, increased $6.7 million and $23.1 million in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011, respectively, compared to the same periods in 2010. The increase was primarily due to headcount increases, as described more fully below, and, for the nine month period, the effect of the Iconoculture acquisition in May 2010.

•

Variable compensation increased $2.4 million and $5.8 million in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011, respectively, compared to the same periods in 2010. The increase in the third quarter was primarily the result of a $2.1 million increase in sales commission expense resulting from increased sales bookings in 2010 and 2011. The year to date increase was primarily the result of a $6.7 million increase in sales commission expense resulting from increased sales bookings in 2010 and 2011.

•

Our expenses are also impacted by currency fluctuations, primarily in the value of the GBP compared to the USD. The value of the GBP versus the USD was approximately $0.06 higher on average in the three months ended September 30, 2011 compared to the same period in 2010. The value of the GBP versus the USD was approximately $0.08 higher on average for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 compared to the same period in 2010. Costs incurred for foreign subsidiaries will fluctuate based upon changes in foreign currency rates in addition to other operational factors. We enter into cash flow hedges for our UK subsidiary to mitigate foreign currency risk, which offsets a portion of the impact foreign currency fluctuations have on costs and expenses.

Cost of services

Cost of services increased 4.5% to $41.9 million in the three months ended September 30, 2011 from $40.1 million in the three months ended September 30, 2010. The increase of $1.8 million was primarily due to a $3.6 million increase in compensation and related costs, including salaries and payroll taxes. The increase in compensation and related costs was primarily due to headcount increases relating to investments in our product research and delivery teams. Additionally, variable compensation expense increased $0.4 million, legal expenses increased $0.2 million, and costs associated with the production and delivery of meetings and other services increased $0.1 million. These increases were partially offset by a $1.5 million decrease in deferred compensation expense, a $0.9 million decrease in third party consulting fees, and a $0.4 million decrease in facilities expense.

Cost of services increased 11.8% to $126.2 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2011 from $112.9 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2010. The increase of $13.3 million was primarily due to an $11.1 million increase in compensation and related costs, including salaries and payroll taxes. The increase in compensation and related costs was primarily due to headcount increases relating to investments in our product research and delivery teams and the acquisition of Iconoculture. Additionally, third-party consulting fees increased $1.9 million, travel and related expenses increased $1.4 million, share based compensation expense increased $0.9 million, and costs associated with the production and delivery of meetings and other services increased $0.5 million. These increases were partially offset by decreases in deferred compensation expense of $1.0 million, variable compensation of $0.9 million, and facilities expense of $0.8 million.

Member relations and marketing

Member relations and marketing expense increased 13.7% to $36.6 million in the three months ended September 30, 2011 from $32.2 million in the three months ended September 30, 2010. The increase of $4.4 million was primarily due to a $3.1 million increase in compensation and related costs, including salaries and payroll taxes, relating to investments in our sales teams and a $2.1 million increase in variable compensation resulting from higher sales bookings across 2010 and 2011. These increases were partially offset by a $0.7 million decrease in deferred compensation expense.

Member relations and marketing expense increased 22.7% to $108.2 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2011 from $88.2 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2010. The increase of $20.0 million was primarily due to a $10.3 million increase in compensation and related costs, including salaries and payroll taxes. The increase in compensation and related costs was primarily due to headcount increases relating to additional capacity and support for our sales teams. Additionally, variable compensation increased $7.2 million due to higher sales bookings across 2010 and 2011 and travel and related expenses increased $0.9 million. Third party consulting fees, share-based compensation expense, benefits expense, and costs of temporary employees each increased $0.2 million. These increases were partially offset by a $0.5 million decrease in deferred compensation expense.

General and administrative

General and administrative expense increased 9.8% to $15.7 million in the three months ended September 30, 2011 from $14.3 million in the three months ended September 30, 2010. The increase of $1.4 million was primarily due to costs related to the Baumgartner acquisition of $0.8 million and a $0.9 million increase in compensation and related costs, including salaries and payroll taxes. Additionally, third party consulting fees and share-based compensation expenses each increased $0.4 million. These increases were partially offset by a $0.7 million decrease in deferred compensation expense, and a $0.4 million decrease in facilities expense.

General and administrative expense increased 11.0% to $49.5 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2011 from $44.6 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2010. The increase of $4.9 million was primarily due to a $3.0 million increase in compensation and related costs, including salaries and payroll taxes. Additionally, transaction costs increased $0.8 million, third party consulting fees and travel and related expenses each increased $0.9 million, and the fair value of the Iconoculture earnout increased $0.6 million. These increases were partially offset by a $0.8 decrease in facilities expense, and a $0.5 million decrease in both deferred compensation and variable compensation.

Depreciation and amortization

Depreciation and amortization expense decreased 11.1% to $4.0 million in the three months ended September 30, 2011 from $4.5 million in the three months ended September 30, 2010. The decrease of $0.5 million was primarily due to a $0.7 million decrease in amortization.

Depreciation and amortization expense decreased 16.3% to $12.8 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2011 from $15.3 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2010. The decrease of $2.5 million was primarily due to a $2.0 million decrease in amortization.

Impairment loss

In the three months ended September 30, 2010, we concluded there were impairment indicators relating to our 2007 acquisition of Toolbox.com based on a combination of factors (including the then current economic environment and the near term outlook for advertising related revenue). We completed an impairment test at August 31, 2010 and concluded that goodwill and intangible asset amounts were impaired. The total pre-tax impairment loss recognized in the three months ended September 30, 2010 was $12.6 million ($9.5 million related to goodwill and $3.1 million related to intangible assets). This non-cash charge did not impact our liquidity position or cash flows.

We utilized the income approach (discounted cash flow method) and the market approach (guideline company method) in the determination of the fair value. Significant assumptions used included: expected revenue growth rates, reporting unit profit margins, and working capital levels; a discount rate of 19%; and a terminal value based upon long-term growth assumptions. The expected future revenue growth rates and profit margins were determined after taking into consideration historical revenue growth rates and profit margins, our assessment of future market potential, and our expectations of future business performance.

Other (expense) income, net

Other (expense) income, net decreased to $2.5 million of expense in the three months ended September 30, 2011 from $3.1 million of income in the three months ended September 30, 2010. Other (expense) income, net for the three months ended September 30, 2011 included a $1.9 million decrease in the fair value of deferred compensation plan assets and a $0.7 million foreign currency loss, partially offset by $0.1 million of interest income, net. Other (expense) income, net in the three months ended September 30, 2010 included a $1.1 million increase in the fair value of deferred compensation plan assets, $0.9 million in other income, a $0.8 million foreign currency gain, and $0.3 million of interest income.

Other (expense) income, net decreased to $0.7 million of expense in the nine months ended September 30, 2011 from $1.9 million of income in the nine months ended September 30, 2010. Other (expense) income, net for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 included a $1.3 million decrease in the fair value of deferred compensation plan assets partially offset by $0.6 million of interest income, net. Other (expense) income, net in the nine months ended September 30, 2010 included $1.1 million of interest income and a $0.8 million increase in the fair value of deferred compensation plan assets.

Provision for income taxes

We recorded a provision for income taxes of $8.1 million in the three months ended September 30, 2011 compared to $4.5 million in the three months ended September 30, 2010. We recorded a provision for income taxes of $23.8 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2011 compared to $20.6 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2010.

The effective tax rate was 36.7% and 40.0% in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011, respectively. The effective tax rate for the three months ended September 30, 2011 includes the effect of a discrete event related to the release of a tax contingency reserve to reflect the lapse of a statute of limitations which resulted in a decrease to the effective tax rate. The tax expense or benefit for unusual items, or certain adjustments to the valuation allowance are treated as discrete items in the interim period in which the events occur. The effective tax rate was 39.0% and 41.0% in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010, respectively. Our provision for income taxes differs from the U.S. statutory rate of 35% primarily due to state income taxes and nondeductible expenses.

We currently anticipate a full-year 2011 expected annualized tax rate of approximately 40%, excluding the effects of unrealized currency translation gains/losses.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Cash flows generated from operating activities have been our primary source of liquidity. On March 16, 2011, we entered into a $100 million five-year senior unsecured, revolving credit facility (the “Credit Facility”) with certain lenders, including Bank of America, N.A., as Administrative Agent, Swing Line Lender and L/C Issuer, and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as Syndication Agent. The Credit Facility contains letter of credit and swing line loan sub-facilities and has a maturity date of March 16, 2016.

The Credit Facility is available for working capital and general corporate purposes. Under the terms of the Credit Facility, we have the right, from time to time, to increase the aggregate revolving commitments from $100 million up to a maximum $150 million, subject to certain limitations set forth in the Credit Facility. We have issued letters of credit under the Credit Facility in an aggregate amount of $7.2 million at September 30, 2011 and have otherwise not borrowed under the Credit Facility.

We had cash and cash equivalents and marketable securities of $107.6 million and $123.5 million at September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively. We believe that existing cash and cash equivalents and marketable securities balances and operating cash flows will be sufficient to support operations, anticipated capital expenditures, and the payment of dividends, as well as potential share repurchases for at least the next 12 months. Our future cash flows will depend on many factors, including our rate of Contract Value growth and selective investments to expand our market presence and enhance technology. Also, we may make investments in, or acquisitions of, complementary businesses, which could require us to borrow under the Credit Facility as an additional source of liquidity for permitted acquisitions or seek additional financing.

In September 2011, we completed the acquisition of Baumgartner. We acquired 100% of the equity interests of Baumgartner for an initial cash payment of approximately $6.0 million less cash acquired of $1.0 million. We will be required to pay up to an additional $1.5 million at various times prior to September 30, 2013.

In May 2010, we completed the acquisition of Iconoculture. We acquired 100% of the equity interests of Iconoculture for an initial cash payment of $16.2 million, less cash acquired totaling $7.2 million, plus a working capital adjustment of $4.0 million paid in July 2010. We also paid $1.5 million on April 1, 2011, which had been held back by us for any indemnifiable losses under the terms of the acquisition agreement. In addition, we paid additional consideration of $2.5 million on April 1, 2011 as final settlement of the additional consideration associated with Iconoculture’s financial performance against certain specified targets for the year ended December 31, 2010.

Cash flows from operating activities

Membership subscriptions, which principally are annually renewable agreements, generally are payable by members at the beginning of the contract term. Historically, the combination of revenue growth, profitable operations, and advance payments of membership subscriptions has resulted in net cash flows provided by operating activities. Net cash flows provided by operating activities were $58.1 million and $47.1 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively.

Cash flows from operations have recently benefited from recent booking trends, as evidenced by the increase in Contract Value, which has resulted in higher year over year balances in accounts receivable and deferred revenues. This benefit was primarily offset by increased incentive compensation paid in the first nine months of 2011 versus the same period of 2010 and increased operating expenses.

We made income tax payments of $27.8 million and $27.3 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively and expect to continue making tax payments in future periods. We made payments under restructuring plans of $3.3 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2010.

Cash flows from investing activities

Our cash management, acquisition, and capital expenditure strategies affect cash flows from investing activities. Net cash flows used in investing activities were $3.7 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2011 versus net cash flows provided by investing activities of $5.2 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2010. We generated $9.8 million from maturities of marketable securities and used $7.6 million for capital expenditures, primarily on technology infrastructure and new product platforms in the nine months ended September 30, 2011. Additionally, we utilized $5.8 million for acquisitions of businesses, primarily related to Baumgartner, which included an initial payment of $5.0 million, net of cash acquired totaling $1.0 million.

We generated $22.4 million from maturities of marketable securities and used $4.2 million for capital expenditures, primarily on technology infrastructure, in the nine months ended September 30, 2010. Additionally, we utilized $13.0 million for the Iconoculture acquisition in May 2010, which included an initial payment of $16.2 million and a working capital payment of $4.0 million, net of cash acquired totaling $7.2 million.

We estimate that capital expenditures to support our infrastructure will be approximately $11.0 million in 2011.

Cash flows from financing activities

Net cash flows used in financing activities were $59.1 million and $12.2 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. The $46.9 million increase in cash outflows is primarily the result of the repurchase of shares of our common stock. During the third quarter of 2011, we utilized $40.3 million to repurchase 1.3 million shares of our common stock pursuant to a publicly announced plan. An additional $3.0 million of the repurchases were the result of employees using common stock received from the exercise of share-based awards to satisfy the minimum statutory federal and state withholding requirements. This is compared to $1.2 million used on the repurchase of shares in the nine months ended September 30, 2010. Additionally we increased our quarterly dividend from $0.11 per share in the first, second, and third quarters of 2010 to $0.15 per share in the first, second, and third quarters of 2011 resulting in dividends paid of $15.4 million and $11.3 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. Additionally, we utilized $3.7 million for the acquisition of businesses, primarily related to payments in April 2011 of the Iconoculture contingent consideration and an amount which had been held back for indemnifiable losses under the terms of the acquisition agreement. We also recorded a $1.8 million tax benefit related to share-based compensation and received $1.6 million from the exercise of share-based awards in the nine months ended September 30, 2011.

Commitments and contingencies

We continue to evaluate potential tax exposure relating to sales and use, payroll, income and property tax laws, and regulations for various states in which we sell or support our goods and services. Accruals for potential contingencies are recorded when it is probable that a liability has been incurred, and the liability can be reasonably estimated. As additional information becomes available, changes in the estimates of the liability are reported in the period that those changes occur. We have a liability of $3.0 million at September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively, relating to certain sales and use tax regulations for states in which we sell or support our goods and services.

Contractual obligations

There have been no material changes to the contractual obligations tables as disclosed in our 2010 Annual Report on Form 10-K. We have operating lease obligations that relate primarily to our office leases that expire on various dates through 2028. The operating lease obligations generally include scheduled rent increases.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

At September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, we had no off-balance sheet financing or other arrangements with unconsolidated entities or financial partnerships (such as entities often referred to as structured finance or special purpose entities) established for purposes of facilitating off-balance sheet financing or other debt arrangements or for other contractually narrow or limited purposes.

Toolbox.com

We review the carrying value of goodwill and conduct impairment tests at least on an annual basis. In the third quarter of 2011, we had indicators of possible impairment relating to the continued weakness in the online advertising market. Toolbox.com has not benefited from the favorable revenue dynamics or operating platform of our membership programs. As a result, we have initiated a comprehensive review of strategic alternatives for its business operations and technology platform. Decisions that we make regarding the future direction of Toolbox.com could impact the recoverability of these assets. The carrying value of the business unit at September 30, 2011 was $5.1 million. We tested the goodwill for impairment and determined that the asset was not impaired. If the test had indicated impairment, then the value of the goodwill would have been written down to its fair value.

We utilized the income approach (discounted cash flow method) and the market approach (guideline company method) in the determination of the fair value. Significant assumptions used included: expected revenue growth rates, reporting unit profit margins, and working capital levels; a discount rate of 19%; and a terminal value based upon long-term growth assumptions. The expected future revenue growth rates and profit margins were determined after taking into consideration historical revenue growth rates and profit margins, our assessment of future market potential, and our expectations of future business performance. We have a focused business plan to support Toolbox.com and increase future sales and operating profits. We will continue to monitor against this plan and review our goodwill for impairment on at least an annual basis, or as required.

Forward-looking statements

This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, including “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in Item 2, contains “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 that involve risks, uncertainties and assumptions. If the risks or uncertainties materialize or the assumptions prove incorrect, the results of the Company and its consolidated subsidiaries may differ materially from those expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements and assumptions. All statements other than statements of historical fact are statements that could be deemed forward-looking statements, including but not limited to any projections of revenues, margins, expenses, provision for income taxes, earnings, cash flows, share repurchases, acquisition synergies, foreign currency exchange rates or other financial items; any statements of the plans, strategies and objectives of management for future operations, including the execution of cost reduction programs and restructuring plans; any statements concerning expected development, performance or market share relating to products or services; any statements regarding future economic conditions or performance; any statements regarding pending investigations, claims or disputes; any statements of expectation or belief; and any statements of assumptions underlying any of the foregoing.

Factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those indicated by forward-looking statements include, among others, our dependence on renewals of our membership-based services, the sale of additional programs to existing members and our ability to attract new members, our potential failure to adapt to member needs and demands, our potential inability to attract and retain a significant number of highly skilled employees, risks associated with the results of restructuring plans, fluctuations in operating results, our potential inability to protect our intellectual property, our potential exposure to loss of revenues resulting from our unconditional service guarantee, exposure to litigation related to our content, various factors that could affect our estimated income tax rate or our ability to utilize our deferred tax assets, changes in estimates, assumptions or revenue recognition policies used to prepare our consolidated financial statements, our potential inability to make, integrate and maintain acquisitions and investments, and the amount and timing of the benefits expected from acquisitions and investments, our potential inability to implement, maintain, upgrade and effectively operate our technology and information infrastructure, our potential inability to effectively manage the risks associated with our international operations, including the risk of foreign currency exchange fluctuations, our potential inability to effectively anticipate, plan for and respond to changing economic and financial markets conditions, especially in light of ongoing uncertainty in the worldwide economy and possible volatility of our stock price. In Part I, “Item 1A. Risk Factors” of the Company’s 2010 Annual Report on Form 10-K, as filed on February 28, 2011, the Company discusses in more detail various important factors that could cause actual results to differ from expected or historic results. One should understand that it is not possible to predict or identify all such factors. Consequently, the reader should not consider any such list to be a complete statement of all potential risks or uncertainties. All forward-looking statements contained in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q are qualified by these cautionary statements and are made only as of the date this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q is filed. We assume no obligation and do not intend to update these forward-looking statements.

Item 3.		Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.

There has been no material change in the Company’s assessment of its sensitivity to market risk since its presentation set forth in Item 7A, “Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk,” in its 2010 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Item 4.		Controls and Procedures.

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

In connection with the preparation of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, with the participation of management, have evaluated our disclosure controls and procedures (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”)). Based on that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer have concluded that as of September 30, 2011, our disclosure controls and procedures are effective in providing reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed in the reports that the Company files and submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported when required and is accumulated and communicated to management, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

There have not been any changes in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the quarter ended September 30, 2011 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1.		Legal Proceedings.

From time to time, the Company is subject to litigation related to normal business operations. The Company vigorously defends itself in litigation. The Company is not currently a party to, and the Company’s property is not subject to, any legal proceedings likely to materially affect our financial results.

Item 1A.		Risk Factors.

In addition to the other information contained in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, you should carefully consider the factors discussed in Part I, “Item 1A. Risk Factors” in our 2010 Annual Report on Form 10-K. There were no material changes during the quarter ended September 30, 2011 to the information included in “Item 1A. Risk Factors” in our 2010 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Item 2.		Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.

Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

										Total Number of
										Shares				Approximate $
						Average				Purchased as				Value of Shares
		Total				Price				Part of a				That May Yet Be
		Number of				Paid Per				Publicly				Purchased
		Shares Purchased				Share				Announced Plan(2)(3)				Under the Plans
July 1, 2011 to July 31, 2011 (1)			6,130			$	43.63				—			$	18,362,583	(4)
August 1, 2011 to August 31, 2011 (1)			582,711			$	31.51				582,711			$	50,000,000	(5)
September 1, 2011 to September 30, 2011(1)			685,269			$	32.02				685,028			$	28,063,156	(5)
Total			1,274,110			$	31.85				1,267,739

Repurchases may be made from time to time in open market and privately negotiated transactions subject to market conditions. No minimum number of shares has been fixed. We fund our share repurchases with cash on hand and cash generated from operations.

Item 3.		Defaults Upon Senior Securities.

None.

Item 4.		(Removed and Reserved).

Item 5.		Other Information.

On November 7, 2011, The Corporate Executive Board Company (“Company”) and The Advisory Board Company agreed to extend the term of their Collaboration Agreement, dated as of February 6, 2007, through February 5, 2014. The Collaboration Agreement was filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission as Exhibit 10.26 to the Company's 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 1, 2007.

Item 6.		Exhibits.

(a)

Exhibits:

Exhibit No.		Description
10.1*		Extension letter, dated November 7, 2011 to the Collaboration Agreement with The Advisory Board Company.
31.1*		Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a — 14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended
31.2*		Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a — 14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended
32.1*		Certifications pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
101.INS**		XBRL Instance Document
101.SCH**		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
101.CAL**		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document
101.LAB**		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Labels Linkbase Document
101.PRE**		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

Exhibit Index

Exhibit No.		Description
10.1*		Extension letter, dated November 7, 2011 to the Collaboration Agreement with The Advisory Board Company.
31.1*		Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a — 14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended
31.2*		Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a — 14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended
32.1*		Certifications pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
101.INS**		XBRL Instance Document
101.SCH**		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
101.CAL**		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document
101.LAB**		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Labels Linkbase Document
101.PRE**		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document