Attached files

file filename
EX-32.1 - SECTION 906 CEO CERTIFICATION - STRATEGIC HOTELS & RESORTS, INCd234397dex321.htm
EX-99.1 - FORWARD-LOOKING INFORMATION AND RISK FACTORS - STRATEGIC HOTELS & RESORTS, INCd234397dex991.htm
EX-32.2 - SECTION 906 CFO CERTIFICATION - STRATEGIC HOTELS & RESORTS, INCd234397dex322.htm
EX-31.2 - SECTION 302 CFO CERTIFICATION - STRATEGIC HOTELS & RESORTS, INCd234397dex312.htm
EXCEL - IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT - STRATEGIC HOTELS & RESORTS, INCFinancial_Report.xls
EX-31.1 - SECTION 302 CEO CERTIFICATION - STRATEGIC HOTELS & RESORTS, INCd234397dex311.htm
Table of Contents

 

 

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

 

 

FORM 10-Q

 

 

(Mark One)

 

x QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2011

or

 

¨ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from             to             

Commission File Number: 001-32223

 

 

STRATEGIC HOTELS & RESORTS, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

 

 

Maryland   33-1082757

(State or other jurisdiction of

incorporation or organization)

 

(I.R.S. Employer

Identification No.)

200 West Madison Street, Suite 1700,

Chicago, Illinois

  60606-3415
(Address of principal executive offices)   (Zip Code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (312) 658-5000

 

 

Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report:

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes   x    No   ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).    Yes  x    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

 

Large accelerated filer   ¨    Accelerated filer   x
Non-accelerated filer   ¨    Smaller reporting company   ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).    Yes  ¨    No  x

The number of shares of common stock (par value $0.01 per share) of the registrant outstanding as of November 2, 2011 was 185,627,199.

 

 

 


Table of Contents

STRATEGIC HOTELS & RESORTS, INC.

FORM 10-Q

FOR THE QUARTER ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2011

INDEX

PAGE

 

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION       
 

ITEM 1.

  FINANCIAL STATEMENTS      3   
 

ITEM 2.

  MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS      34   
 

ITEM 3.

  QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK      69   
 

ITEM 4.

  CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES      71   
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION   
 

ITEM 1.

  LEGAL PROCEEDINGS      71   
 

ITEM 1A.

  RISK FACTORS      71   
 

ITEM 2.

  UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS      71   
 

ITEM 3.

  DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES      71   
 

ITEM 4.

  (REMOVED AND RESERVED)      71   
 

ITEM 5.

  OTHER INFORMATION      71   
 

ITEM 6.

  EXHIBITS      72   
SIGNATURES      73   

WHERE TO FIND MORE INFORMATION:

We maintain a website at www.strategichotels.com. Through our website, we make available, free of charge, our annual proxy statement, annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, and amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, as soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically file such material with, or furnish it to, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). The SEC maintains a website that contains these reports at www.sec.gov.

This report (and Exhibit 99.1 hereto) contains registered trademarks that are the exclusive property of their respective owners, which are companies other than us, including Fairmont®, Four Seasons®, Hilton®, Hyatt®, InterContinental®, Loews®, Marriott®, Renaissance®, Ritz-Carlton® and Westin®. None of the owners of these trademarks, their affiliates or any of their respective officers, directors, agents or employees has or will have any liability or responsibility for any financial statements, projections or other financial information or other information contained in this report.


Table of Contents

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.

STRATEGIC HOTELS & RESORTS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES (SHR)

UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(In Thousands, Except Share Data)

 

      September 30,
2011
    December 31,
2010
 

Assets

    

Investment in hotel properties, net

   $ 1,707,798      $ 1,835,451   

Goodwill

     40,359        40,359   

Intangible assets, net of accumulated amortization of $8,311 and $6,536

     31,301        32,620   

Assets held for sale

     —          45,145   

Investment in unconsolidated affiliates

     128,407        18,024   

Cash and cash equivalents

     88,843        78,842   

Restricted cash and cash equivalents

     44,543        34,618   

Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $1,538 and $1,922

     47,959        35,250   

Deferred financing costs, net of accumulated amortization of $2,587 and $15,756

     11,680        3,322   

Deferred tax assets

     6,017        4,121   

Other assets

     26,791        34,564   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total assets

   $ 2,133,698      $ 2,162,316   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Liabilities, Noncontrolling Interests and Equity

    

Liabilities:

    

Mortgages and other debt payable

   $ 1,000,706      $ 1,118,281   

Bank credit facility

     —          28,000   

Liabilities of assets held for sale

     —          93,206   

Accounts payable and accrued expenses

     240,397        266,773   

Deferred tax liabilities

     48,848        1,732   

Deferred gain on sale of hotels

     3,781        3,930   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total liabilities

     1,293,732        1,511,922   

Noncontrolling interests in SHR’s operating partnership

     3,678        5,050   

Equity:

    

SHR’s shareholders’ equity:

    

8.50% Series A Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock ($0.01 par value per share; 4,488,750 shares issued and outstanding; liquidation preference $25.00 per share and $138,450 and $131,296 in the aggregate)

     108,206        108,206   

8.25% Series B Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock ($0.01 par value per share; 4,600,000 shares issued and outstanding; liquidation preference $25.00 per share and $141,091 and $133,975 in the aggregate)

     110,775        110,775   

8.25% Series C Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock ($0.01 par value per share; 5,750,000 shares issued and outstanding; liquidation preference $25.00 per share and $176,363 and $167,469 in the aggregate)

     138,940        138,940   

Common shares ($0.01 par value per share; 250,000,000 common shares authorized; 185,627,199 and 151,305,314 common shares issued and outstanding)

     1,856        1,513   

Additional paid-in capital

     1,715,023        1,553,286   

Accumulated deficit

     (1,170,022     (1,185,294

Accumulated other comprehensive loss

     (78,695     (107,164
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total SHR’s shareholders’ equity

     826,083        620,262   

Noncontrolling interests in consolidated affiliates

     10,205        25,082   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total equity

     836,288        645,344   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total liabilities, noncontrolling interests and equity

   $ 2,133,698      $ 2,162,316   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

See accompanying notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

 

3


Table of Contents

STRATEGIC HOTELS & RESORTS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES (SHR)

UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

AND COMPREHENSIVE (LOSS) INCOME

(In Thousands, Except Per Share Data)

 

     Three Months Ended
September 30,
    Nine Months Ended
September 30,
 
     2011     2010     2011     2010  

Revenues:

        

Rooms

   $ 110,048      $ 94,995      $ 310,330      $ 268,674   

Food and beverage

     58,664        54,028        195,987        172,423   

Other hotel operating revenue

     19,939        18,762        59,860        57,285   

Lease revenue

     1,255        1,108        3,747        3,383   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total revenues

     189,906        168,893        569,924        501,765   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Operating Costs and Expenses:

        

Rooms

     29,283        27,364        85,728        77,938   

Food and beverage

     45,345        40,947        142,010        124,038   

Other departmental expenses

     51,358        49,701        155,856        145,869   

Management fees

     5,879        5,222        18,203        16,818   

Other hotel expenses

     12,672        12,621        39,497        40,048   

Lease expense

     1,249        1,106        3,702        3,396   

Depreciation and amortization

     25,526        32,209        86,222        98,195   

Corporate expenses

     (2,228     8,679        24,206        22,098   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total operating costs and expenses

     169,084        177,849        555,424        528,400   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Operating income (loss)

     20,822        (8,956     14,500        (26,635

Interest expense

     (21,838     (22,118     (67,148     (68,488

Interest income

     41        64        124        369   

Loss on early extinguishment of debt

     (399     (39     (1,237     (925

Loss on early termination of derivative financial instruments

     —          —          (29,242     (18,263

Equity in (losses) earnings of unconsolidated affiliates

     (1,867     3,001        (6,266     2,900   

Foreign currency exchange (loss) gain

     (209     (132     77        (1,394

Other income, net

     355        1,605        4,716        2,299   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Loss before income taxes and discontinued operations

     (3,095     (26,575     (84,476     (110,137

Income tax expense

     (867     (68     (279     (296
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Loss from continuing operations

     (3,962 )       (26,643     (84,755     (110,433

Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax

     19        (4,143     101,215        6,474   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net (Loss) Income

     (3,943 )       (30,786     16,460        (103,959

(Loss) gain on currency translation adjustments

     (546     7,024        (8,453     2,713   

(Loss) gain on derivatives activity

     (301     (11,707     36,922        (34,839
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Comprehensive (Loss) Income

     (4,790     (35,469     44,929        (136,085

Comprehensive loss (income) attributable to the noncontrolling interests in SHR’s operating partnership

     20        221        (202     1,216   

Comprehensive (income) attributable to the noncontrolling interests in consolidated affiliates

     (254     (1,086     (997     (858
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Comprehensive (Loss) Income Attributable to SHR

   $ (5,024   $ (36,334   $ 43,730      $ (135,727
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net (Loss) Income

   $ (3,943   $ (30,786   $ 16,460      $ (103,959

Net loss (income) attributable to the noncontrolling interests in SHR’s operating partnership

     16        192        (70     879   

Net (income) attributable to the noncontrolling interests in consolidated affiliates

     (254     (1,086     (997     (858
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net (Loss) Income Attributable to SHR

     (4,181     (31,680     15,393        (103,938

Preferred shareholder dividends

     (7,721     (7,721     (23,164     (23,164
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net Loss Attributable to SHR Common Shareholders

   $ (11,902   $ (39,401   $ (7,771   $ (127,102
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Amounts Attributable to SHR:

        

Loss from continuing operations

   $ (4,200   $ (27,564   $ (85,356   $ (110,336

Income (loss) from discontinued operations

     19        (4,116     100,749        6,398   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net (loss) income

   $ (4,181   $ (31,680   $ 15,393      $ (103,938
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Basic and Diluted (Loss) Income Per Share:

        

Loss from continuing operations attributable to SHR common shareholders

   $ (0.06   $ (0.23   $ (0.62   $ (1.18

(Loss) income from discontinued operations attributable to SHR common shareholders

     —          (0.03     0.58        0.06   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net loss attributable to SHR common shareholders

   $ (0.06   $ (0.26   $ (0.04   $ (1.12
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Weighted average common shares outstanding

     186,146        151,635        173,349        113,237   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

See accompanying notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

 

4


Table of Contents

STRATEGIC HOTELS & RESORTS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES (SHR)

UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(In Thousands)

 

     Nine Months Ended September 30,  
     2011     2010  

Operating Activities:

    

Net income (loss)

   $ 16,460      $ (103,959

Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by operating activities (including discontinued operations):

    

Deferred income tax benefit

     (2,976     (236

Depreciation and amortization

     86,222        103,607   

Amortization of deferred financing costs, discount and interest rate swap costs

     16,250        30,347   

Loss on early extinguishment of debt

     1,237        925   

Loss on early termination of derivative financial instruments

     29,242        18,263   

Equity in losses (earnings) of unconsolidated affiliates

     6,266        (2,900

Share-based compensation

     11,776        8,402   

Gain on sale of assets

     (103,570     (1,237

Foreign currency exchange gain

     (128     (6,096

Recognition of deferred gains

     (1,365     (3,477

Mark to market of derivative financial instruments

     (487     9,778   

Increase in accounts receivable

     (5,963     (130

Increase in other assets

     (5,496     (483

(Decrease) increase in accounts payable and accrued expenses

     (1,032     4,523   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net cash provided by operating activities

     46,436        57,327   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Investing Activities:

    

Proceeds from sale of investments

     9,000        —     

Proceeds from sale of assets

     55,245        1,850   

Cash received from unconsolidated affiliates

     996        964   

Unconsolidated affiliates recapitalization

     (93,153     —     

Unrestricted cash acquired through acquisition and recapitalization

     30,600        —     

Unrestricted cash sold or contributed

     (6,935     —     

Capital expenditures

     (38,372     (26,500

Increase in restricted cash and cash equivalents

     (13,717     (18,636

(Increase) decrease in security deposits related to sale-leasebacks

     (1,270     308   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net cash used in investing activities

     (57,606     (42,014
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Financing Activities:

    

Proceeds from issuance of common stock

     50,000        349,140   

Equity issuance costs

     (761     (17,308

Borrowings under bank credit facility

     325,500        100,500   

Payments on bank credit facility

     (353,500     (242,500

Exchangeable senior notes tender

     —          (180,000

Proceeds from mortgages

     470,000        —     

Payments on mortgages and other debt

     (409,047     (32,501

Acquisition of noncontrolling interest in consolidated affiliates

     (19,522     —     

Debt financing costs

     (12,473     (175

Distributions to holders of noncontrolling interests in consolidated affiliates

     (32     (16

Interest rate swap costs

     (33,340     (35,152

Other financing activities

     (559     (678
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities

     16,266        (58,690
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Effect of exchange rate changes on cash

     1,906        (3,124
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net change in cash and cash equivalents

     7,002        (46,501

Change in cash of assets held for sale

     2,999        (3,968

Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period

     78,842        116,310   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents, end of period

   $ 88,843      $ 65,841   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

See accompanying notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

 

5


Table of Contents

STRATEGIC HOTELS & RESORTS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES (SHR)

UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS – Continued

(In Thousands)

 

      Nine Months Ended September 30,  
     2011     2010  

Supplemental Schedule of Non-Cash Activities:

    

Acquisition of hotel properties (see note 3)

   $ 89,273      $ —     
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Acquisition of noncontrolling interest (see note 8)

   $ 70,300      $ —     
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

(Gain) loss on mark to market of derivative instruments (see notes 2 and 9)

   $ (9,482   $ 34,839   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Increase in capital expenditures recorded as liabilities

   $ 1,462      $ 94   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Cash Paid For:

    

Interest, net of interest capitalized

   $ 51,280      $ 38,733   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Income taxes, net of refunds

   $ 2,803      $ 1,982   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

See accompanying notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

 

6


Table of Contents

STRATEGIC HOTELS & RESORTS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

1. GENERAL

Strategic Hotels & Resorts, Inc. (SHR and, together with its subsidiaries, the Company) was incorporated in January 2004 to acquire and asset-manage upper upscale and luxury hotels that are subject to long-term management contracts. As of September 30, 2011, the Company’s portfolio included 17 full-service hotel interests located in urban and resort markets in: the United States; Punta Mita, Nayarit, Mexico; Hamburg, Germany; and London, England. The Company operates in one reportable business segment, hotel ownership.

SHR operates as a self-administered and self-managed real estate investment trust (REIT), which means that it is managed by its board of directors and executive officers. A REIT is a legal entity that holds real estate interests and, through payments of dividends to stockholders, is permitted to reduce or avoid federal income taxes at the corporate level. For SHR to continue to qualify as a REIT, it cannot operate hotels; instead it employs internationally known hotel management companies to operate its hotels under management contracts. SHR conducts its operations through its direct and indirect subsidiaries, including its operating partnership, Strategic Hotel Funding, L.L.C. (SH Funding), which currently holds substantially all of the Company’s assets. SHR is the sole managing member of SH Funding and holds approximately 99% of its membership units as of September 30, 2011. SHR manages all business aspects of SH Funding, including the sale and purchase of hotels, the investment in these hotels and the financing of SH Funding and its assets.

As of September 30, 2011, SH Funding owned interests in or leased the following 17 hotels:

 

1. Fairmont Chicago

   10. InterContinental Miami

2. Fairmont Scottsdale Princess (1)

   11. Loews Santa Monica Beach Hotel

3. Four Seasons Jackson Hole

   12. Marriott Hamburg (5)

4. Four Seasons Punta Mita Resort

   13. Marriott Lincolnshire (6)

5. Four Seasons Silicon Valley

   14. Marriott London Grosvenor Square (6)

6. Four Seasons Washington, D.C.

   15. Ritz-Carlton Half Moon Bay

7. Hotel del Coronado (2)

   16. Ritz-Carlton Laguna Niguel

8. Hyatt Regency La Jolla (3)

   17. Westin St. Francis

9. InterContinental Chicago (4)

  

 

(1) 

This property is owned by an unconsolidated affiliate in which the Company indirectly holds a 50% interest (see note 5). One land parcel at this property is subject to a ground lease arrangement.

(2) 

This property is owned by an unconsolidated affiliate in which the Company indirectly holds a 34.3% interest (see note 5).

(3) 

This property is owned by a consolidated affiliate in which the Company indirectly holds a 53.5% interest (see note 8).

(4)

The Company owns 100% of this property after acquiring its partner’s 49% noncontrolling interest on June 24, 2011

     (see note 8).
(5)

The Company has a leasehold interest in this property.

(6) 

These properties are subject to ground lease arrangements.

2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Basis of Presentation:

The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements and related notes have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAP) and in conformity with the rules and regulations of the SEC applicable to interim financial information. As such, certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with GAAP have been omitted in accordance with the rules and regulations of the SEC. In the opinion of management, the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements contain all adjustments, consisting of normal recurring accruals, necessary to present fairly the financial position of the Company and its results of operations and cash flows for the interim periods presented. The Company believes the disclosures made are adequate to prevent the information presented from being misleading. However, the

 

7


Table of Contents

STRATEGIC HOTELS & RESORTS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

 

unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the Company’s audited consolidated financial statements included in SHR’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010. The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of SHR, its subsidiaries and other entities in which the Company has a controlling interest.

If the Company determines that it is the holder of a variable interest in a variable interest entity (VIE) within the meaning of new accounting guidance adopted on January 1, 2010, which amends the consolidation guidance of VIEs, and it is the primary beneficiary under this new guidance, then the Company will consolidate the entity. For entities that are not considered VIEs, the Company consolidates those entities it controls. It accounts for those entities over which it has a significant influence but does not control using the equity method of accounting. At September 30, 2011, SH Funding owned the following interests in unconsolidated affiliates, which are accounted for using the equity method of accounting: a 50% interest in the unconsolidated affiliate that owns the Fairmont Scottsdale Princess (Fairmont Scottsdale Princess Venture), a 34.3% interest in the unconsolidated affiliate that owns the Hotel del Coronado (Hotel del Coronado Venture), and a 31% interest in the unconsolidated affiliate that owns the Four Seasons Residence Club Punta Mita (RCPM) (see note 5). At September 30, 2011, SH Funding also owned an 85.8% controlling interest in the entity that owns both a condominium-hotel development adjacent to the Hotel del Coronado (North Beach Venture) and a 40% interest in the Hotel del Coronado Venture (see note 5), and a 53.5% controlling interest in the entity that owns the Hyatt Regency La Jolla hotel, which are consolidated in the accompanying financial statements.

All significant intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated in consolidation. Certain amounts included in the financial statements for prior periods have been reclassified to conform to the current financial statement presentation as a result of discontinued operations.

Use of Estimates:

The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Restricted Cash and Cash Equivalents:

At September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, restricted cash and cash equivalents included $18,059,000 and $15,920,000, respectively, that will be used for property and equipment replacement in accordance with hotel management or lease agreements. At September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, restricted cash and cash equivalents also included reserves of $26,484,000 and $18,698,000, respectively, required by loan and other agreements.

Income Taxes:

SHR has elected to be taxed as a REIT under Sections 856 through 860 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the Tax Code). As a REIT, SHR generally will not be subject to U.S. federal income tax if it distributes 100% of its annual taxable income to its shareholders. As a REIT, SHR is subject to a number of organizational and operational requirements. If it fails to qualify as a REIT in any taxable year, SHR will be subject to U.S. federal income tax (including any applicable alternative minimum tax) on its taxable income at regular corporate tax rates. Even if it qualifies for taxation as a REIT, it may be subject to foreign, state and local income taxes and to U.S. federal income tax and excise tax on its undistributed income. In addition, taxable income from SHR’s taxable REIT subsidiaries is subject to federal, foreign, state and local income taxes. Also, the foreign countries where the Company has operations do not recognize REITs under their respective tax laws. Accordingly, the Company is subject to tax in those jurisdictions.

 

8


Table of Contents

STRATEGIC HOTELS & RESORTS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

 

Deferred tax assets and liabilities are established for net operating loss carryforwards and temporary differences between the financial reporting basis and the tax basis of assets and liabilities at the enacted tax rates expected to be in effect when the net operating loss carryforwards are utilized and when the temporary differences reverse. The Company evaluates uncertain tax positions in accordance with applicable accounting guidance. A valuation allowance for deferred tax assets is provided if the Company believes all or some portion of the deferred tax asset may not be realized. Any increase or decrease in the valuation allowance that results from a change in circumstances that causes a change in the estimated realizability of the related deferred tax asset is included in earnings.

The Company completed an equity offering during the second quarter of 2010 (see note 8), which resulted in an ownership change under Section 382 of the Tax Code. As a result, some of the Company’s net operating loss carryforwards were reduced or eliminated in accordance with the provisions of Section 382. A full valuation reserve has been provided against net operating loss carryforwards not subject to Section 382 due to uncertainty of realization. Therefore, the ownership change had no impact to the statements of operations.

For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, income tax expense related to continuing operations is summarized as follows (in thousands):

 

     Three Months Ended     Nine Months Ended  
     September 30,     September 30,  
     2011     2010     2011     2010  

Current tax (expense) benefit:

        

Mexico

   $ (1,348   $ (214   $ (1,977   $ (1,232

Europe

     (236     —          (284     —     

United States

     29        (10     (1,373     (10
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 
     (1,555     (224     (3,634     (1,242
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Deferred tax benefit (expense):

        

Mexico

     1,747        718        1,974        535   

United States

     (1,059     (562     1,381        411   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 
     688        156        3,355        946   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total income tax (expense):

   $ (867   $ (68   $ (279   $ (296
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Per Share Data:

Basic loss per share is computed by dividing the net loss attributable to SHR common shareholders by the weighted average common shares outstanding during each period. Diluted loss per share is computed by dividing the net loss attributable to SHR common shareholders as adjusted for the impact of dilutive securities, if any, by the weighted average common shares outstanding plus potentially dilutive securities. Dilutive securities may include restricted stock units (RSUs), options to purchase shares of SHR common stock (Options), units payable in SHR’s common stock under the Company’s Value Creation Plan (VCP Stock Units), exchangeable debt securities and noncontrolling interests that have an option to exchange their interests to shares of SHR common stock. No effect is shown for securities that are anti-dilutive. The following table sets forth the components of the calculation of loss from continuing operations attributable to SHR common shareholders for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010 (in thousands):

 

     Three Months Ended     Nine Months Ended  
     September 30,     September 30,  
     2011     2010     2011     2010  

Numerator:

        

Loss from continuing operations attributable to SHR

   $ (4,200   $ (27,564   $ (85,356   $ (110,336

Preferred shareholder dividends

     (7,721     (7,721     (23,164     (23,164
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Loss from continuing operations attributable to SHR common shareholders

   $ (11,921   $ (35,285   $ (108,520   $ (133,500
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Denominator:

        

Weighted average common shares – basic and diluted

     186,146        151,635        173,349        113,237   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

9


Table of Contents

STRATEGIC HOTELS & RESORTS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

 

Securities that could potentially dilute basic loss per share in the future that are not included in the computation of diluted loss per share because they are anti-dilutive at September 30, 2011 and 2010 are as follows (in thousands):

 

    

Computation For

Three Months
Ended

    

Computation For

Nine Months
Ended

 
     September 30,      September 30,  
     2011      2010      2011      2010  

Noncontrolling interests

     853         955         853         955   

Options, RSUs and VCP Stock Units

     3,126         1,726         3,126         1,726   

Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss:

The Company’s accumulated other comprehensive loss (OCL) results from mark to market of certain derivative financial instruments and unrealized gains or losses on foreign currency translation adjustments (CTA). The following tables provide the components of accumulated OCL as of September 30, 2011 and 2010 (in thousands):

 

     Derivative
and Other

Adjustments
    CTA     Accumulated
OCL
 

Balance at January 1, 2011

   $ (94,933   $ (12,231   $ (107,164

Mark to market of derivative instruments

     9,428        —          9,428   

Reclassification to equity in (losses) earnings of unconsolidated affiliates

     54        —          54   

Reclassification to loss on early termination of derivative financial instruments

     27,440        —          27,440   

Reclassification to income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax

     —          (5,095     (5,095

CTA activity

     —          (3,358     (3,358
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Balance at September 30, 2011

   $ (58,011   $ (20,684   $ (78,695
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

     Derivative
and Other

Adjustments
    CTA      Accumulated
OCL
 

Balance at January 1, 2010

   $ (81,449   $ 12,108       $ (69,341

Mark to market of derivative instruments

     (50,454     —           (50,454

Reclassification to equity in (losses) earnings of unconsolidated affiliates

     73        —           73   

Reclassification to loss on early termination of derivative financial instruments

     15,542        —           15,542   

CTA activity

     —          2,713         2,713   
  

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

 

Balance at September 30, 2010

   $ (116,288   $ 14,821       $ (101,467
  

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

 

New Accounting Guidance:

In September 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) amended its guidance on the testing of goodwill impairment to allow an entity the option to first assess qualitative factors to determine whether the current two-step process is necessary. Under the amended guidance, the calculation of the reporting unit’s fair value (step one of the goodwill impairment test) is not required unless, as a result of the qualitative assessment,

 

10


Table of Contents

STRATEGIC HOTELS & RESORTS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

 

it is more likely than not that the fair value of the reporting unit is less than the unit’s carrying amount. If it is not more likely than not that the fair value of the reporting unit is less than the carrying amount, further testing of goodwill for impairment would not be performed. The amendment is effective for fiscal years and interim periods within such years beginning after December 15, 2011, which for the Company will be its 2012 first quarter, with early adoption permitted. The adoption of this guidance is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s financial statements.

In June 2011, the FASB issued new guidance that amends current comprehensive income guidance. The new guidance eliminates the option to present the components of other comprehensive income as part of the statement of shareholders’ equity. Instead, the Company must report comprehensive income in either a single continuous statement of comprehensive income which contains two sections, net income and other comprehensive income, or in two separate but consecutive statements. Additionally, the guidance requires an entity to present on the face of the financial statements reclassification adjustments for items that are reclassified from other comprehensive income to net income in the statement(s) where the components of net income and the components of other comprehensive income are presented. The new guidance will be effective January 1, 2012. The adoption of the new guidance will not have a material impact on the Company’s financial statements.

In December 2010, the FASB issued new guidance that amends the criteria for performing the second step of the goodwill impairment test for reporting units with zero or negative carrying amounts and requires performing the second step if qualitative factors indicate that it is more likely than not that a goodwill impairment exists. The Company adopted the new guidance on January 1, 2011, and determined that it did not have a material impact to the financial statements.

3. INVESTMENT IN HOTEL PROPERTIES, NET

The following summarizes the Company’s investment in hotel properties as of September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, excluding the leasehold interest in the Marriott Hamburg, unconsolidated affiliates and assets held for sale (in thousands):

 

     September 30,     December 31,  
     2011     2010  

Land

   $ 334,048      $ 318,756   

Land held for development

     103,089        107,908   

Leasehold interest

     11,633        11,633   

Buildings

     1,316,226        1,405,462   

Building and leasehold improvements

     79,559        95,487   

Site improvements

     29,197        43,487   

Furniture, fixtures and equipment

     421,647        423,588   

Improvements in progress

     17,214        10,679   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total investment in hotel properties

     2,312,613        2,417,000   

Less accumulated depreciation

     (604,815     (581,549
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total investment in hotel properties, net

   $ 1,707,798      $ 1,835,451   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Consolidated hotel properties

     14        13   

Consolidated hotel rooms

     6,078        6,403   

 

11


Table of Contents

STRATEGIC HOTELS & RESORTS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

 

Acquisition of Four Seasons Silicon Valley and Four Seasons Jackson Hole Hotels

On March 11, 2011, the Company acquired the Four Seasons Silicon Valley and Four Seasons Jackson Hole hotels in exchange for an aggregate of 15,200,000 shares of SHR’s common stock at a price of $6.08 per share based on the March 11, 2011 SHR common share closing price, or approximately $92,416,000. The allocation of the purchase price for the acquisition is as follows (in thousands):

 

     Four Seasons
Silicon  Valley
     Four Seasons
Jackson  Hole
 

Land

   $ 5,518       $ 19,669   

Buildings

     27,269         33,450   

Site improvements

     400         444   

Furniture, fixtures and equipment

     2,827         4,236   

Intangible assets

     88         372   

Net working capital

     378         (2,235
  

 

 

    

 

 

 
   $ 36,480       $ 55,936   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

4. DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS

The results of operations of hotels sold or assets held for sale are classified as discontinued operations and segregated in the consolidated statements of operations for all periods presented. The following is a summary of income (loss) from discontinued operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010 (in thousands):

 

     Three Months Ended     Nine Months Ended  
     September 30,     September 30,  
     2011     2010     2011     2010  

Hotel operating revenues

   $   —        $ 19,495      $ 9,743      $ 51,987   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Operating costs and expenses

     (54     13,984        9,456        40,394   

Depreciation and amortization

     —          1,859        —          5,413   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total operating costs and expenses

     (54     15,843        9,456        45,807   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Operating income

     54        3,652        287        6,180   

Interest expense

     —          (2,378     —          (7,716

Interest income

     —          8        —          19   

Foreign currency exchange (loss) gain

     —          (5,096     51        7,490   

Other income, net

     —          —          326        —     

Income tax expense

     —          (329     (379     (736

(Loss) gain on sale

     (35     —          100,930        1,237   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Income (loss) from discontinued operations

   $ 19      $ (4,143   $ 101,215      $ 6,474   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Assets Sold:

Paris Marriott Champs Elysees (Paris Marriott)

On April 6, 2011, the Company sold its leasehold interest in the Paris Marriott hotel for consideration of €29,200,000 ($41,567,000). As part of the transaction, the Company received €10,100,000 ($14,500,000) of an additional €11,600,000 ($16,630,000) owed related to the release of the security deposit and other closing adjustments for total proceeds of approximately €40,800,000 ($58,197,000). The Company received the remaining €1,500,000 ($2,013,000) on October 11, 2011. The Company recorded a gain on sale of the property of $100,910,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 primarily due to the recognition of an existing deferred gain resulting from a sale-leaseback transaction related to this hotel (see note 6).

 

12


Table of Contents

STRATEGIC HOTELS & RESORTS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

 

The hotel’s assets and liabilities owned by the Company were classified as held for sale on the accompanying consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2010. The significant components of assets held for sale and liabilities of assets held for sale at December 31, 2010 consist of the following (in thousands):

 

     December 31,  
     2010  

Investment in hotel properties, net

   $ 6,226   

Cash

     2,999   

Restricted cash

     1,320   

Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts

     5,636   

Deferred tax asset (a)

     26,712   

Other assets

     2,252   
  

 

 

 

Assets held for sale

   $ 45,145   
  

 

 

 

Accounts payable and accrued expenses

   $ 6,969   

Deferred gain on sale of hotel (a)

     86,237   
  

 

 

 

Liabilities of assets held for sale

   $ 93,206   
  

 

 

 

 

  (a) In 2003, the Company recorded a sale-leaseback of the Paris Marriott and the related gain on sale was deferred for financial reporting purposes. The gain on sale was recognized for French income tax purposes, which resulted in recognition of a deferred tax asset. The deferred tax asset was reduced as the deferred gain was amortized over the life of the lease.

InterContinental Prague

On December 15, 2010, the Company sold the InterContinental Prague hotel for an approximate consideration of €106,090,000 ($141,368,000). The consideration included the assignment of the hotel’s third party debt of €101,600,000 ($135,385,000) and the interest rate swap liability related to the third party indebtedness, estimated to be approximately €4,490,000 ($5,983,000). During the fourth quarter of 2010, the Company received net sales proceeds of $3,564,000. In addition, as part of the transaction, approximately €2,000,000 ($2,665,000) of restricted cash related to the hotel was released to the Company.

Hyatt Regency New Orleans

On December 28, 2007, the Company sold the Hyatt Regency New Orleans for a gross sales price of $32,000,000, of which $23,000,000 was received in cash at closing and $9,000,000 was received in the form of a promissory note from the purchaser with a $6,000,000 tranche and a $3,000,000 tranche. The Company initially deferred recognition of the gain on sale of the hotel and recorded it as an offset to the promissory note. In March 2008, the Company received payment on the $6,000,000 tranche and recognized $416,000 of the gain. In the second quarter of 2010, the Company agreed to accept payment of $1,850,000 to settle the remaining obligation. The Company recognized the deferred gain in the second quarter of 2010 and subsequently received the payment on July 2, 2010.

 

13


Table of Contents

STRATEGIC HOTELS & RESORTS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

 

5. INVESTMENT IN UNCONSOLIDATED AFFILIATES

Investment in unconsolidated affiliates as of September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 includes the following (in thousands):

 

     September 30,      December 31,  
     2011      2010  

Fairmont Scottsdale Princess Venture (a)

   $ 27,712       $ —     

Hotel del Coronado Venture (b)

     96,824         —     

Hotel and North Beach Ventures (b)

     —           7,787   

Four Seasons RCPM (c)

     3,871         3,878   

BuyEfficient (d)

     —           6,359   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total investment in unconsolidated affiliates

   $ 128,407       $ 18,024   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

  (a) On June 9, 2011, the Company completed a recapitalization of the Fairmont Scottsdale Princess hotel. The Company entered into agreements with an unaffiliated third party, an affiliate of Walton Street Capital, L.L.C. (Walton Street), to form FMT Scottsdale Holdings, LLC and Walton/SHR FPH Holdings, L.L.C. (together, the Fairmont Scottsdale Princess Venture) to own the Fairmont Scottsdale Princess hotel. The Company contributed the assets and liabilities of the hotel and cash of $34,864,000 in exchange for a 50% ownership interest in the Fairmont Scottsdale Princess Venture. The Company jointly controls the venture with Walton Street and serves as the managing member. The Company also continues to serve as the hotel’s asset manager and is entitled to earn a quarterly base management fee equal to 1.0% of total revenues during years one and two following the formation of the Fairmont Scottsdale Princess Venture, 1.25% during years three and four, and 1.5% thereafter, as well as certain project management fees. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011, the Company recognized fees of $4,000, and $15,000, respectively, which are included in other income, net on the consolidated statements of operations. In connection with the Fairmont Scottsdale Princess Venture, the Company is entitled to certain promote payments after Walton Street achieves a specified return.

As part of the recapitalization, the Fairmont Scottsdale Princess Venture retired the hotel’s $40,000,000 mezzanine debt. In addition, the hotel’s $140,000,000 first mortgage was amended and extended. The amendment included a $7,000,000 principal payment, and the debt was extended through December 2013 with an option for a second extension through April 9, 2015, subject to certain conditions. Interest remains payable monthly at the London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR) plus 0.36%.

 

  (b) As of December 31, 2010, the Company owned 45.0% ownership interests in SHC KSL Partners, LP (Hotel Venture), the then owner of the Hotel del Coronado, and in HdC North Beach Development, LLLP (North Beach Venture), the owner of an adjacent residential condominium-hotel development. The Company earned asset management, development and financing fees under agreements with the Hotel and North Beach Ventures. The Company recognized income of 55.0% of these fees, representing the percentage of the Hotel and North Beach Ventures not owned by the Company. These fees amounted to $220,000 and $527,000 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010, respectively, and are included in other income, net in the consolidated statements of operations.

In January 2006, the Hotel Venture entered into non-recourse mortgage and mezzanine loans with principal amounts of $610,000,000. The loans accrued interest at LIBOR plus a blended spread of 2.08%. In addition, the Hotel Venture entered into a $20,000,000 non-recourse revolving credit facility that bore interest at LIBOR plus 2.50%. At December 31, 2010, there was a balance of $18,500,000 on the revolving credit facility and there were no letters of credit outstanding. In December 2010, the Hotel Venture purchased a $37,500,000 mezzanine layer of the debt structure for a discounted pay-off of $13,000,000. The remaining principal on the loans and revolving credit facility had a maturity date of January 7, 2011. On January 7, 2011, the Hotel Venture obtained an extension of the maturity date to February 9, 2011.

On February 4, 2011, the Hotel and North Beach Ventures completed a recapitalization (the Transaction) through a series of contemporaneous transactions. Under the terms of the Transaction, the Company acquired the ownership interest of an existing member of the Hotel and North Beach Ventures, and, along

 

14


Table of Contents

STRATEGIC HOTELS & RESORTS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

 

with the remaining members of the Hotel Venture, formed a partnership, BSK Del Partners, L.P. (Hotel del Coronado Venture) with an unaffiliated third party, an affiliate of Blackstone Real Estate Advisors VI L.P. (Blackstone), to own the Hotel del Coronado. As part of the Transaction, the Company contributed $57,380,000 of cash drawn from the Company’s bank credit facility to fund its contribution. This payment included the purchase of the existing member’s ownership in the Hotel and North Beach Ventures and is net of a $1,700,000 financing fee earned as part of the Transaction. The Hotel Venture contributed substantially all of the assets and liabilities to the Hotel del Coronado Venture. The Hotel del Coronado Venture then settled all contributed debts outstanding by paying balances off in full or agreeing to convert debt to equity. In connection with the Transaction, the Company also acquired its partner’s interest in HdC DC Corporation, a taxable corporation, with assets of $25,597,000 and an existing deferred tax liability of approximately $48,575,000. As a result of the Transaction, the Company recorded an equity method investment of $97,649,000. Pursuant to the terms of the Transaction, Blackstone is the general partner of the Hotel del Coronado Venture with a 60.0% ownership interest and the Company is a limited partner with an indirect 34.3% ownership interest.

The Hotel del Coronado Venture secured $425,000,000 of five-year debt financing at a weighted average rate of LIBOR plus 480 basis points, subject to a 1% LIBOR floor. After the third year of the loan, the final two one-year extensions require payment to the lender of a 25 basis point extension fee. Additionally, the Hotel del Coronado Venture purchased a two-year, 2.0% LIBOR cap, which was required by the loan.

The Company continues to act as asset manager and earns a quarterly asset management fee equal to 1.0% of gross revenue, certain development fees, and when applicable, an incentive fee equal to one-third of the incentive fee paid to the hotel operator under the hotel management agreement. As part of the Hotel del Coronado Venture with Blackstone, the Company and the other remaining member of the Hotel Venture earn a profit-based incentive fee of 20.0% of all distributions of the Hotel del Coronado Venture that exceed both a 20.0% internal rate of return and two times return on invested equity. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011, the Company recognized fees of $266,000 and $1,780,000, respectively, which are included in other income, net on the consolidated statements of operations.

 

  (c) The Company owns a 31% interest in and acts as asset manager for an unconsolidated affiliate with two unaffiliated parties that is developing the Four Seasons RCPM, a luxury vacation home product that is being sold in fractional ownership interests on the property adjacent to the Company’s Four Seasons Punta Mita Resort in Mexico. The Company earns asset management fees and recognizes income of 69% of these fees, representing the percentage not owned by the Company. These fees amounted to $5,000 and $13,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively, and $38,000 and $89,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively, and are included in other income, net on the consolidated statements of operations.

 

  (d) On December 7, 2007, the Company acquired a 50% interest in BuyEfficient for $6,346,000. BuyEfficient is an electronic purchasing platform that allows members to procure food, operating supplies, furniture, fixtures and equipment. In January 2011, the Company sold its 50% interest for $9,000,000 and recognized a gain on sale of $2,640,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2011, which is included in other income, net on the consolidated statement of operations.

 

15


Table of Contents

STRATEGIC HOTELS & RESORTS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

 

Condensed Combined Financial Information of Investment in Unconsolidated Affiliates

The following is summarized financial information for the Company’s unconsolidated affiliates as of September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 and for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010 (in thousands):

 

     September 30,      December 31,  
     2011      2010  

Assets

     

Investment in hotel properties, net

   $ 718,414       $ 298,362   

Goodwill

     —           23,401   

Intangible assets, net

     43,926         49,000   

Cash and cash equivalents

     32,562         22,400   

Restricted cash and cash equivalents

     34,959         12,087   

Other assets

     32,085         20,842   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total assets

   $ 861,946       $ 426,092   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Liabilities and Partners’ Equity (Deficit)

     

Mortgage and other debt payable

   $ 558,000       $ 592,476   

Other liabilities

     46,697         33,472   

Partners’ equity (deficit)

     257,249         (199,856
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total liabilities and partners’ equity (deficit)

   $ 861,946       $ 426,092   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

     Three Months Ended     Nine Months Ended  
     September 30,     September 30,  
     2011     2010     2011     2010  

Revenues

        

Hotel operating revenue

   $ 51,044      $ 39,683      $ 113,644      $ 94,167   

Residential sales

     526        1,153        3,069        8,026   

Other

     —          1,266        —          3,689   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total revenues

     51,570        42,102        116,713        105,882   

Expenses

        

Hotel operating expenses

     36,500        24,088        82,091        63,321   

Residential costs of sales

     184        600        1,023        4,178   

Depreciation and amortization

     8,540        4,347        18,829        12,952   

Other operating expenses

     1,084        1,575        5,155        6,230   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total operating expenses

     46,308        30,610        107,098        86,681   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Operating income

     5,262        11,492        9,615        19,201   

Interest expense, net

     (8,028     (4,574     (22,284     (13,307

Other expenses, net

     (335     (193     (1,892     (36
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net (loss) income

   $ (3,101   $ 6,725      $ (14,561   $ 5,858   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Equity in (losses) earnings in unconsolidated affiliates

        

Net (loss) income

   $ (3,101   $ 6,725      $ (14,561   $ 5,858   

Partners’ share of loss (income) of unconsolidated affiliates

     1,216        (3,687     7,690        (3,269

Adjustments for basis differences, taxes and intercompany eliminations

     18        (37     605        311   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total equity in (losses) earnings of unconsolidated affiliates

   $ (1,867   $ 3,001      $ (6,266   $ 2,900   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

As a result of the Transaction, the Company recorded the net assets of the Hotel del Coronado Venture at their fair values. To the extent that the Company’s cost basis is different than the basis reflected at the unconsolidated affiliate level, the basis difference, excluding amounts attributable to land and goodwill, is amortized over the life of the related asset and included in the Company’s share of equity in (losses) earnings of the unconsolidated affiliates.

 

16


Table of Contents

STRATEGIC HOTELS & RESORTS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

 

6. OPERATING LEASE AGREEMENTS

In June 2004, the Company recorded a sale of the Marriott Hamburg, and the Company’s leaseback of the hotel was reflected as an operating lease. A deferred gain was recorded in conjunction with the sale and is being recognized as a reduction of lease expense over the life of the lease. For the three months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, the Company recognized $42,000 and $51,000 of the deferred gain, respectively, and for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, recognized $151,000 and $154,000, respectively. As of September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the deferred gain on the sale of the Marriott Hamburg recorded on the accompanying consolidated balance sheets amounted to $3,781,000 and $3,930,000, respectively. On a monthly basis, the Company makes minimum rent payments aggregating to an annual total of €3,654,000 (adjusting by an index formula) ($4,892,000 based on the foreign exchange rate as of September 30, 2011) and pays additional rent based upon the performance of the hotel, which are recorded as lease expense in the Company’s consolidated statements of operations. A euro-denominated security deposit at September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 was $2,544,000 and $2,540,000, respectively, and is included in other assets on the Company’s consolidated balance sheets. The Company subleases its interest in the Marriott Hamburg to a third party. The Company has reflected the sublease arrangement as an operating lease and records lease revenue.

In June 2004, the Company recorded a sale of the Paris Marriott, and the Company’s leaseback of the hotel was reflected as an operating lease. A deferred gain was recorded in conjunction with the sale and was being recognized as a reduction of lease expense over the life of the lease. On April 6, 2011, the Company sold its leasehold interest in the Paris Marriott (see note 4). The hotel’s assets and liabilities owned by the Company were classified as held for sale on the accompanying consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2010 and the results of operations have been classified as discontinued operations in the consolidated statements of operations for all periods presented. As of December 31, 2010, the deferred gain on the sale of the Paris Marriott amounted to $86,237,000, which is recorded in liabilities of assets held for sale. Prior to the sale of the hotel on April 6, 2011, the Company recognized $1,088,000 as amortization of the deferred gain in income (loss) from discontinued operations as a reduction to lease expense for the three months ended September 30, 2010 and $1,214,000 and $3,321,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. When the sale closed, the remaining $90,624,000 unamortized deferred gain was recognized as a gain on sale of the Paris Marriott in income (loss) from discontinued operations. On a monthly basis, the Company made minimum rent payments and paid additional rent based upon the performance of the hotel, which was included in income (loss) from discontinued operations, in the Company’s consolidated statements of operations. At December 31, 2010, a euro-denominated security deposit was $14,459,000, and was included in other assets on the Company’s consolidated balance sheet. The entire security deposit was returned to the Company after the sale of the Paris Marriott leasehold interest (see note 4).

 

7. INDEBTEDNESS

Mortgages and Other Debt Payable:

Certain subsidiaries of SHR are the borrowers under various financing arrangements. These subsidiaries are separate legal entities and their respective assets and credit are not available to satisfy the debt of SHR or any of its other subsidiaries.

 

17


Table of Contents

STRATEGIC HOTELS & RESORTS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

 

Mortgages and other debt payable at September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 consisted of the following (in thousands):

 

                   Balance Outstanding at  

Debt

   Spread (a)
(basis points)
     Current Maturity      September 30,
2011
     December 31,
2010
 

Hyatt Regency La Jolla

     100         September 2012       $ 97,500       $ 97,500   

Marriott London Grosvenor Square (b)

     110         October 2013         113,980         117,281   

Four Seasons Washington, D.C. (b)(c)

     315         July 2014         130,000         —     

Loews Santa Monica Beach Hotel (b)(d)

     385         July 2015         110,000         118,250   

InterContinental Miami (b)(d)

     350         July 2016         85,000         90,000   

Fairmont Chicago (b)

     Fixed         June 2017         97,750         97,750   

Westin St. Francis (b)

     Fixed         June 2017         220,000         220,000   

InterContinental Chicago (b)(d)

     Fixed         August 2021         145,000         121,000   

Fairmont Scottsdale Princess (e)

     —           —           —           180,000   

Ritz-Carlton Half Moon Bay (c)

     —           —           —           76,500   
        

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total mortgages payable

           999,230         1,118,281   

Other debt (f)

     Fixed         January 2013         1,476         —     
        

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total mortgages and other debt payable

         $ 1,000,706       $ 1,118,281   
        

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

  (a) Interest on mortgage loans is paid monthly at the applicable spread over LIBOR (0.24% at September 30, 2011) for all mortgage loans except for those secured by the Marriott London Grosvenor Square (£73,130,000 and £75,190,000 at September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively), the Westin St. Francis, the Fairmont Chicago, and the InterContinental Chicago. Interest on the Marriott London Grosvenor Square loan is paid quarterly at the applicable spread over three-month GBP LIBOR (0.95% at September 30, 2011). Interest on the Westin St. Francis and Fairmont Chicago loans is paid monthly at an annual fixed rate of 6.09%, and interest on the InterContinental Chicago loan is paid monthly at an annual fixed rate of 5.61%.

 

  (b) These loan agreements require maintenance of financial covenants, all of which the Company was in compliance with at September 30, 2011.

 

  (c) On June 29, 2011, the Company repaid the mortgage loan secured by the Ritz-Carlton Half Moon Bay, which became one of the borrowing base properties under the Company’s $300,000,000 bank credit facility agreement (as described below). The Ritz-Carlton Half Moon Bay replaced the Four Seasons Washington, D.C., which was a borrowing base property under the Company’s previous $350,000,000 bank credit facility, as collateral under the new bank credit facility. In July 2011, after being released as collateral under the bank credit facility, the Company entered into a mortgage agreement that is secured by the Four Seasons Washington, D.C. hotel, which has two, one-year extension options, subject to certain conditions. The maturity date in the table excludes extension options.

 

  (d) In July 2011, the Company refinanced these mortgage loans by repaying the outstanding loan balances and entering into new loan agreements with new lenders. The Company recorded $399,000 of loss on early extinguishment of debt, which included the write off of unamortized deferred financing costs and other closing costs applicable to the loans, for three and nine months ended September 30, 2011. The mortgage loan secured by the InterContinental Miami has two, one-year extension options, subject to certain conditions. The mortgage loan secured by the Loews Santa Monica Beach Hotel has three, one-year extension options, subject to certain conditions. The maturity dates in the table exclude extension options.

 

  (e) On June 9, 2011, the Company completed a recapitalization of the Fairmont Scottsdale Princess hotel (see note 5). After the recapitalization, the Company’s ownership interest in the Fairmont Scottsdale Princess hotel is accounted for as an equity method investment and its mortgage debt is no longer reflected in the Company’s consolidated balance sheets.

 

  (f) The North Beach Venture assumed the mortgage loan on a hotel-condominium unit, which accrues interest at an annual fixed rate of 5.0% and is secured by the hotel-condominium unit. The hotel-condominium unit, with a carrying value of $1,594,000, is included in other assets on the consolidated balance sheet as of September 30, 2011.

 

18


Table of Contents

STRATEGIC HOTELS & RESORTS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

 

Other Debt:

In connection with the acquisition of a 60-acre oceanfront land parcel in Punta Mita, Nayarit, Mexico in October 2007, the Company executed two $17,500,000 non-interest bearing promissory notes. The Company recorded these notes at their present value based on an imputed interest rate of 9.5% and amortized the resulting discount over the life of the promissory notes. On September 30, 2008, the Company paid the first of the $17,500,000 non-interest bearing promissory notes. The second note was due August 31, 2009. In August 2009, the Company entered into an agreement with the holder of the promissory note whereby the holder released the Company from its final installment payment of $17,500,000 that was due in August 2009 in exchange for the Company agreeing to provide the note holder with the right to an interest in the property. The Company will receive a preferred position which will entitle it to receive the first $12,000,000 of distributions generated from the property with any excess distributions split equally among the partners. The Company’s obligations under this agreement, recorded as other liabilities in accounts payable and accrued expenses on the Company’s consolidated balance sheets, are subject to the note holder being able to obtain certain permits and licenses to develop the land and the execution of an amended partnership agreement.

Exchangeable Notes:

On April 4, 2007, SH Funding issued $150,000,000 in aggregate principal amount of 3.50% Exchangeable Senior Notes due 2012 (Exchangeable Notes) and on April 25, 2007 issued an additional $30,000,000 of Exchangeable Notes in connection with the exercise by the initial purchasers of their over-allotment option. The Exchangeable Notes were issued at 99.5% of par value. The Company received proceeds of $175,593,000, net of underwriting fees and expenses and original issue discount. On January 1, 2009, the Company adopted the provisions of new guidance on accounting for convertible debt instruments that may be settled in cash upon conversion, including partial cash settlements, and retrospectively recorded an additional discount on the Exchangeable Notes of $20,978,000 as of the issuance date. The Exchangeable Notes paid interest in cash semi-annually in arrears on April 1 and October 1 of each year beginning October 1, 2007.

On May 10, 2010, the Company announced a cash tender offer to purchase any and all of the Exchangeable Notes outstanding. On June 7, 2010, the Company completed the tender offer and accepted for purchase, at par, $180,000,000 of the principal amount of its outstanding Exchangeable Notes. The aggregate consideration for the Exchangeable Notes accepted for purchase was approximately $181,208,000, which included accrued and unpaid interest of approximately $1,208,000. The Company allocated $169,939,000 of the consideration to the settlement of the liability and $10,061,000 to equity. This allocation was based on the fair value of the Exchangeable Notes excluding the conversion feature using unobservable (Level 3) inputs, which included a discount cash flow analysis and the Company’s nonconvertible debt borrowing rate. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010, the Company recognized a loss on early extinguishment of debt of $39,000 and $925,000, respectively.

The table below presents the effect of the Exchangeable Notes on the Company’s consolidated statements of operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 (in thousands):

 

     Nine Months
Ended
 
     September 30,
2010
 

Statements of Operations:

  

Coupon interest

   $ 2,783   

Discount amortization

     1,865   
  

 

 

 

Total interest

   $ 4,648   
  

 

 

 

Effective interest rate

     6.25
  

 

 

 

 

19


Table of Contents

STRATEGIC HOTELS & RESORTS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

 

Bank Credit Facility:

On June 30, 2011, SH Funding entered into a $300,000,000 bank credit facility agreement. The agreement contains an accordion feature allowing for additional borrowing capacity up to $400,000,000, subject to the satisfaction of customary conditions set forth in the agreement. The following summarizes key terms of the bank credit facility:

 

   

interest on the facility is payable monthly at LIBOR plus an applicable margin in the case of each LIBOR loan and base-rate plus an applicable margin in the case of each base rate loan whereby the applicable margins are dependent on the ratio of consolidated debt to gross asset value (Leverage Ratio) as follows:

 

Leverage Ratio

   Applicable Margin of
each LIBOR Loan
(% per annum)
    Applicable Margin of
each Base Rate Loan
(% per annum)
 

Greater than or equal to 60%

     3.75     2.75

Greater than or equal to 55% but less than 60%

     3.50     2.50

Greater than or equal to 50% but less than 55%

     3.25     2.25

Greater than or equal to 45% but less than 50%

     3.00     2.00

Less than 45%

     2.75     1.75

 

   

an unused commitment fee is payable monthly based on the unused revolver balance at a rate of 0.45% per annum in the event that the bank credit facility usage is less than 50% and a rate of 0.25% per annum in the event that the bank credit facility usage is equal to or greater than 50%;

 

   

maturity date of June 30, 2014, with the right to extend the maturity date for an additional one-year period with an extension fee equal to 25 basis points, subject to certain conditions;

 

   

lenders received collateral in the form of mortgages over four borrowing base properties, which initially include the Ritz-Carlton Laguna Niguel, the Ritz-Carlton Half Moon Bay, the Four Seasons Punta Mita Resort, and the Marriott Lincolnshire, in addition to pledges of the Company’s interest in SH Funding and SH Funding’s interest in certain subsidiaries and guarantees of the loan from the Company and certain of its subsidiaries;

 

   

maximum availability is determined by the lesser of 60% advance rate against the appraised value of the borrowing base properties (provided at any time the total fixed charge coverage ratio is less than 1.25 times, the percentage shall be reduced to 55%) or a 1.20 times debt service coverage on the borrowing base properties (based on the trailing 12 months net operating income for these assets divided by the greater of the in-place interest rate or 7.0% debt constant on the balance outstanding under the bank credit facility) provided not more than 40% of aggregate appraised value and 40% of trailing 12 month net operating income is attributable to borrowing base properties located outside the United States;

 

   

minimum corporate fixed charge coverage of 1.00 times from the closing date through the fourth quarter of 2012, 1.10 times through 2013, 1.20 times from the first quarter of 2014 through the initial maturity date, and 1.30 times during the extension year, which will permanently increase to 1.35 times if cash dividends are reinstated on SHR’s common stock;

 

   

maximum corporate leverage of 65% during the initial term and 60% during any extension period;

 

   

minimum tangible net worth of $700,000,000, excluding goodwill and currency translation adjustments, plus an amount equal to 75% of the net proceeds of any new issuances of SHR’s common stock, which is not used to reduce indebtedness or used in a transaction or series of transactions to redeem outstanding capital stock;

 

20


Table of Contents

STRATEGIC HOTELS & RESORTS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

 

   

restrictions on SHR and SH Funding’s ability to pay dividends. Such restrictions include:

 

   

prohibitions on SHR and SH Funding and their respective subsidiaries’ ability to pay any dividends unless certain ratios and other conditions are met; and

 

   

prohibitions on SHR and SH Funding’s ability to issue dividends in cash or in kind at any time an event of default shall have occurred.

Notwithstanding the dividend restrictions described above, for so long as the Company qualifies, or has taken all other actions necessary to qualify as a REIT, SH Funding may authorize, declare, and pay quarterly cash dividends to the Company when and to the extent necessary for the Company to distribute cash dividends to its shareholders generally in an aggregate amount not to exceed the minimum amount necessary for the Company to maintain its tax status as a REIT, unless certain events of default exist. In addition, provided no event of default exists, the Company is permitted to pay the outstanding cumulative accrued but unpaid preferred dividends at any time on or prior to June 30, 2012. Subsequent to June 30, 2012, provided no event of default exists, the Company is permitted to pay the outstanding cumulative accrued but unpaid preferred dividends subject to certain conditions set forth in the credit facility agreement.

The agreement contains certain other terms and conditions, including provisions to release assets from the borrowing base and limitations on the Company’s ability to incur costs for discretionary capital programs and redeem, retire or repurchase common stock. Under the agreement, SH Funding has a letter of credit sub-facility of $75,000,000, which is secured by the $300,000,000 bank credit facility. Letters of credit reduce the borrowing capacity under the bank credit facility.

This agreement replaced the previous $350,000,000 bank credit facility, as amended. The Company wrote off $692,000 of unamortized deferred financing costs applicable to the $350,000,000 bank credit facility, which is included in loss on early extinguishment of debt for the nine months ended September 30, 2011. The previous bank credit facility had a maturity date of March 9, 2012 and an interest rate of LIBOR plus a margin of 3.75% in the case of each LIBOR loan and base-rate plus a margin of 2.75% in the case of each base rate loan and a commitment fee of 0.50% per annum based on the unused revolver balance.

The weighted average interest rate for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011 was 3.35% and 3.74%, respectively. At September 30, 2011, maximum availability under the bank credit facility was $295,000,000 and there were no borrowings outstanding under the bank credit facility and outstanding letters of credit of $2,100,000 (see note 12). The agreement also requires maintenance of financial covenants, all of which SH Funding and SHR were in compliance with at September 30, 2011.

 

21


Table of Contents

STRATEGIC HOTELS & RESORTS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

 

Debt Maturity:

The following table summarizes the aggregate maturities (assuming all extension options exercised) as of September 30, 2011 for all mortgages and other debt payable and the Company’s bank credit facility (in thousands):

 

Years ending

December 31,

   Amounts  

2011 (remainder)

   $ —     

2012

     109,107   

2013

     123,112   

2014

     13,872   

2015

     15,046   

Thereafter

     739,569   
  

 

 

 

Total

   $ 1,000,706   
  

 

 

 

Interest Expense:

Total interest expense in continuing and discontinued operations includes a reduction related to capitalized interest of $279,000 and $160,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively, and $825,000 and $488,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. Total interest expense in continuing and discontinued operations includes amortization of deferred financing costs of $894,000 and $1,599,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively, and $2,816,000 and $5,100,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively.

8. EQUITY AND DISTRIBUTION ACTIVITY

Common Shares:

The following table presents the changes in the issued and outstanding shares of SHR common stock since December 31, 2010 (excluding 853,461 and 954,571 units of SH Funding (OP Units) outstanding at September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively, which are redeemable for shares of SHR common stock on a one-for-one basis, or the cash equivalent thereof, subject to certain restrictions and at the option of SHR) (in thousands):

 

Outstanding at December 31, 2010

     151,305   

RSUs redeemed for shares of SHR common stock

     222   

OP Units redeemed for shares of SHR common stock

     101   

Common stock issued

     33,999   
  

 

 

 

Outstanding at September 30, 2011

     185,627   
  

 

 

 

Common Stock

On June 24, 2011, SHR issued an aggregate of 10,798,846 shares of its common stock in connection with the acquisition of interests in the InterContinental Chicago and Hyatt Regency La Jolla hotels at a price of $6.51 per share (see Noncontrolling Interests below). The shares issued in connection with the acquisition are restricted from being transferred for twelve months from the closing date, subject to certain exceptions set forth in a stock transfer restriction agreement.

On March 11, 2011, SHR issued an aggregate of 15,200,000 shares of its common stock in connection with the acquisition of the Four Seasons Silicon Valley and Four Seasons Jackson Hole hotels (see note 3). In addition, SHR issued 8,000,000 shares of its common stock to an affiliate of the seller in a concurrent private placement at a price of $6.25 per share. The shares issued in connection with the acquisitions of the hotels and the concurrent private placement are restricted from being transferred for twelve months from the closing date, subject to certain exceptions set forth in a stock transfer restriction and registration rights agreement. After expenses, net proceeds from the concurrent private placement totaled approximately $49,727,000, which were used to repay existing indebtedness under the Company’s previous $350,000,000 bank credit facility, as amended.

 

22


Table of Contents

STRATEGIC HOTELS & RESORTS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

 

On May 19, 2010, SHR completed a public offering of common stock by issuing 75,900,000 shares at a price of $4.60 per share. After discounts, commissions, and expenses, SHR raised net proceeds of approximately $331,832,000. These proceeds were used to fund the cash tender offer of the Exchangeable Notes (see note 7) and repay existing indebtedness under the Company’s previous $350,000,000 bank credit facility, as amended.

As of September 30, 2011, no shares of SHR common stock have been repurchased under the $50,000,000 share repurchase program.

Stockholder Rights Plan

In November 2008, SHR’s board of directors adopted a stockholder rights plan. Under the plan, SHR declared a dividend of one preferred share purchase right (Right) for each outstanding share of SHR common stock. The dividend was payable on November 28, 2008 to the stockholders of record as of the close of business on November 28, 2008. Each Right will allow its holder to purchase from SHR one one-thousandth of a share of a new series of SHR participating preferred stock for $20.00, once the Rights become exercisable. The Rights will become exercisable and will separate from SHR’s common stock only upon the occurrence of certain events. On November 24, 2009, the Company entered into an amendment to extend the stockholder rights plan through November 30, 2012, unless the rights are earlier redeemed or amended by SHR’s board of directors.

Distributions:

On November 4, 2008, SHR’s board of directors elected to suspend the quarterly dividend to holders of shares of SHR common stock.

Distributions are declared quarterly to holders of shares of SHR preferred stock. In February 2009, SHR’s board of directors elected to suspend the quarterly dividend beginning with the first quarter of 2009 to holders of shares of 8.50% Series A Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock, 8.25% Series B Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock, and 8.25% Series C Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock. Dividends on the preferred stock are cumulative. As of September 30, 2011, unpaid cumulative dividends on SHR’s preferred stock were as follows:

 

     Aggregate
(in thousands)
     Per Share  

8.50% Series A Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock

   $ 26,231       $ 5.84   

8.25% Series B Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock

   $ 26,091       $ 5.67   

8.25% Series C Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock

   $ 32,613       $ 5.67   

Pursuant to the articles supplementary governing the preferred stock, if the Company does not pay quarterly dividends on its preferred stock for six quarters, whether or not consecutive, the size of its board of directors will be increased by two and the holders of the preferred stock will have the right to elect two additional directors to the board. As of September 30, 2011, the Company did not pay quarterly dividends for 11 quarters. There have been no new directors added to the board pursuant to this right.

Noncontrolling Interests:

On June 24, 2011, the Company acquired the 49.0% interest in the InterContinental Chicago hotel that was previously owned by DND Hotel JV Private Limited, an affiliate of the Government of Singapore Investment Corporation Pte Ltd., giving the Company 100% ownership of the InterContinental Chicago hotel. As part of the transaction, the Company also acquired an additional 2.5% ownership interest in the Hyatt Regency La Jolla hotel, giving the Company a 53.5% controlling ownership interest in that hotel. Total consideration was $90,183,000, which included the issuance of 10,798,846 shares of SHR common stock at a price of $6.51 per share based on the June 24, 2011 SHR common share closing price, $19,402,000 of cash which includes the Company’s pro-rata share of working capital and post-closing adjustments of $480,000.

 

23


Table of Contents

STRATEGIC HOTELS & RESORTS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

 

The following tables reflect the reconciliation of the beginning and ending balances of the equity attributable to SHR and the noncontrolling owners (in thousands):

 

     SHR
Shareholders’
Equity
    Nonredeemable
Noncontrolling
Interests
    Total
Permanent
Shareholders’
Equity
    Total
Redeemable
Noncontrolling
Interests
(Temporary
Equity) (a)
 

Balance at December 31, 2010

   $ 620,262      $ 25,082      $ 645,344      $ 5,050   

Common shares issued

     210,956        —          210,956        1,003   

RSUs redeemed for common shares

     2        —          2        —     

Net income

     15,393        997        16,390        70   

CTA

     (8,413     —          (8,413     (40

Derivatives activity

     36,750        —          36,750        172   

Share-based compensation

     12,222        —          12,222        56   

Distribution

     —          (32     (32     —     

Redemption value adjustment

     1,829        —          1,829        (1,829

Noncontrolling interests assumed in the Transaction

     —          10,725        10,725        —     

Acquisition of noncontrolling interest

     (63,722     (26,581     (90,303     —     

Other

     804        14        818        (804
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Balance at September 30, 2011

   $ 826,083      $ 10,205      $ 836,288      $ 3,678   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

     SHR
Shareholders’
Equity
    Nonredeemable
Noncontrolling
Interests
    Total
Permanent
Shareholders’
Equity
    Total
Redeemable
Noncontrolling
Interests
(Temporary
Equity) (a)
 

Balance at December 31, 2009

   $ 568,980      $ 23,188      $ 592,168      $ 2,717   

Common shares issued

     330,338        —          330,338        2,128   

Tender of Exchangeable Notes

     (10,126     —          (10,126     —     

RSUs redeemed for common shares

     2        —          2        —     

Net (loss) income

     (103,938     858        (103,080     (879

CTA

     2,693        —          2,693        20   

Derivatives activity

     (34,481     —          (34,481     (358

Share-based compensation

     1,437        —          1,437        12   

Distributions

     (35     (15     (50     —     

Redemption value adjustment

     (1,499     —          (1,499     1,499   

Other

     1,092        53        1,145        (1,092
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Balance at September 30, 2010

   $ 754,463      $ 24,084      $ 778,547      $ 4,047   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

(a) The historical cost of the redeemable noncontrolling interests is based on the proportional relationship between the carrying value of equity associated with SHR’s common shareholders relative to that of the unitholders of SH Funding, as OP Units may be exchanged into SHR common stock on a one-for-one basis. The interests held by the noncontrolling partners are stated at the greater of carrying value or their redemption value.

As of September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the redeemable noncontrolling interests had a redemption value of approximately $3,678,000 (based on the September 30, 2011 SHR common share closing price of $4.31) and $5,050,000 (based on the December 31, 2010 SHR common share closing price of $5.29), respectively. As of September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, the redeemable noncontrolling interests had a redemption value of approximately $4,047,000 (based on the September 30, 2010 SHR common share closing price of $4.24) and $1,776,000 (based on the December 31, 2009 SHR common share closing price of $1.86), respectively.

 

24


Table of Contents

STRATEGIC HOTELS & RESORTS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

 

The following table discloses the effects of changes in the Company’s ownership interests in its noncontrolling interests (in thousands):

 

     Three Months Ended
September 30,
    Nine Months Ended
September 30,
 
     2011     2010     2011     2010  

Net (loss) income attributable to SHR

   $ (4,181   $ (31,680   $ 15,393      $ (103,938

Decrease in SHR’s additional paid-in capital for the acquisition of additional ownership interests in the InterContinental Chicago and Hyatt Regency La Jolla hotels

     (121     —          (63,722     —     
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Change from (loss) income attributable to SHR and transfers from noncontrolling interests

   $ (4,302   $ (31,680   $ (48,329   $ (103,938
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

9. DERIVATIVES

The Company manages its interest rate risk by varying its exposure to fixed and variable rates while attempting to minimize its interest costs. The Company manages its fixed interest rate and variable interest rate risk through the use of interest rate caps and swaps. The Company enters into interest rate caps and swaps with high credit quality counterparties and diversifies its positions among such counterparties in order to reduce its exposure to credit losses. The caps limit the Company’s exposure on its variable-rate debt that would result from an increase in interest rates. The Company’s lenders, as stipulated in the respective loan agreements, generally require such caps. Upon extinguishment of debt, income effects of cash flow hedges are reclassified from accumulated OCL to interest expense, equity in (losses) earnings of unconsolidated affiliates, loss on early extinguishment of debt, or income (loss) from discontinued operations, as appropriate. The Company records all derivatives at fair value as either other assets or accounts payable and accrued expenses in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.

The valuation of the interest rate swaps and caps is determined using widely accepted valuation techniques including discounted cash flow analysis on the expected cash flows of each derivative. This analysis reflects the contractual terms of the derivatives, including the period to maturity, and uses observable market-based inputs, including interest rate curves and implied volatilities. The Company incorporates credit valuation adjustments (CVA) to appropriately reflect its own nonperformance risk and the respective counterparty’s nonperformance risk. When assessing nonperformance risk, the Company has considered the impact of netting and any applicable credit enhancements, such as collateral postings, thresholds, mutual puts, and guarantees.

Except for the CVA, all inputs used to measure fair value of the derivative financial instruments are Level 2 inputs. The Company has concluded that the inputs used to measure its CVA are Level 3 inputs. If the inputs used to measure fair value fall in different levels of the fair value hierarchy, the level in the fair value hierarchy within which the fair value measurement in its entirety falls shall be determined based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement in its entirety. The Company assessed the impact of the CVA on the overall fair value of its derivative instruments and concluded that the CVA has a significant impact to the fair values as of September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010. As of September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, all derivative liabilities are categorized as Level 3.

Derivatives in Cash Flow Hedging Relationships:

The Company’s objectives in using interest rate derivatives are to add stability to interest expense and to manage its exposure to interest rate movements. To accomplish this objective, the Company primarily uses interest rate swaps and caps as part of its interest rate risk management strategy. Interest rate swaps designated as cash flow hedges involve the receipt of variable-rate amounts from a counterparty in exchange for the Company making fixed-rate payments over the life of the agreements without exchange of the underlying notional amount.

 

25


Table of Contents

STRATEGIC HOTELS & RESORTS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

 

The effective portion of changes in the fair value of derivatives in cash flow hedging relationships is recorded in accumulated OCL and is subsequently reclassified into earnings in the period that the hedged forecasted transaction affects earnings. During the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, such derivatives were used to hedge the variable cash flows associated with existing variable-rate debt. The ineffective portion of the change in fair value of the derivatives is recognized directly in earnings.

Amounts reported in accumulated OCL related to derivatives will be reclassified to interest expense as interest payments are made on the Company’s variable-rate debt. During the next twelve months, the Company estimates that an additional $21,608,000 will be reclassified as an increase to interest expense.

As of September 30, 2011, the Company had the following outstanding interest rate derivatives that were designated as cash flow hedges of interest rate risk:

 

Interest Rate Derivatives

   Number
of Instruments
     Notional Amount
(in thousands)
 

Interest rate swaps

     2       $ 200,000   

Interest rate swap

     1       £ 73,130   

At September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the aggregate notional amount of the Company’s domestic interest rate swaps designated as cash flows was $200,000,000 and $725,000,000, respectively. The Company’s swaps have fixed pay rates against LIBOR of 5.23% and 5.27% and maturity dates of December 2015 and February 2016.

In addition, at September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the Company had a GBP LIBOR interest rate swap agreement with a notional amount of £73,130,000 and £75,190,000, respectively. The swap has a current fixed pay rate against GBP LIBOR of 5.72% and a maturity date of October 2013.

Changes in Forecasted Levels of LIBOR-based Debt—Termination and De-designation of Cash Flow Hedges

In the second quarter of 2011, the Company concluded that it was not probable that originally forecasted levels of LIBOR-based debt would occur as a result of the Fairmont Scottsdale Princess hotel recapitalization on June 9, 2011, whereby the hotel’s debt is no longer consolidated in the Company’s financial statements (see note 5), and the conversion of the InterContinental Chicago loan to a fixed-rate loan on July 28, 2011 (see note 7). On June 20, 2011, the Company paid $29,672,000 to terminate five interest rates swaps with a combined notional amount of $300,000,000. The Company recorded a charge of $27,257,000, which included the immediate write-off of $25,455,000 previously recorded in accumulated OCL related to interest rates swaps that were designated to hedge transactions that are no longer probable of occurring and $1,802,000 of mark to market adjustments and termination fees related to the terminated interest rate swaps. The charge was recorded in loss on early termination of derivative financial instruments in the consolidated statements of operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2011. In addition, based on changes in the forecasted levels of LIBOR-based debt, the Company de-designated one interest rate swap as a cash flow hedge as described below. The Company recorded a charge of $1,985,000 to write-off amounts previously recorded in accumulated OCL related to this swap. The charge was recorded in loss on early termination of derivative financial instruments in the consolidated statements of operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2011. Changes in the market value of the interest rate swap will be recorded in earnings subsequent to the de-designation.

In February 2011, the Company paid $4,201,000 to terminate three interest rate swaps with a combined notional amount of $125,000,000. There were no immediate charges to earnings in February 2011 based on the Company’s forecasted levels of LIBOR-based debt at the time of the transaction.

 

26


Table of Contents

STRATEGIC HOTELS & RESORTS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

 

Derivatives Not Designated as Hedging Instruments:

Derivatives not designated as hedges are not speculative and are used to manage the Company’s exposure to interest rate movements and other identified risks but do not meet the hedge accounting requirements. Changes in the fair value of derivatives not designated in hedging relationships are recorded directly in earnings. As of September 30, 2011, the Company had the following outstanding interest rate derivatives that were not designated as hedging instruments:

 

Interest Rate Derivatives

   Number
of Instruments
     Notional Amount
(in thousands)
 

Interest rate swap

     2       $ 200,000   

Interest rate caps

     7       $ 535,750   

During the third quarter of 2011, the Company purchased an interest rate cap with a LIBOR strike price of 4.0%. The interest rate cap, with a notional amount of $130,000,000, covers the mortgage loan secured by the Four Seasons Washington, D.C. hotel.

During the second quarter of 2011, the Company de-designated an interest rate swap as a cash flow hedge with a notional amount of $100,000,000. The swap has a fixed pay rate against LIBOR of 4.90% and a maturity date of September 2014. During the second quarter of 2010, the Company de-designated an interest rate swap as a cash flow hedge with a notional amount of $100,000,000. The swap has a fixed pay rate against LIBOR of 4.96% and a maturity date of December 2014.

At September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the aggregate notional amount of the Company’s purchased and sold interest rate cap agreements was $535,750,000 and $594,750,000, respectively. These caps have LIBOR strike rates ranging from 4.00% to 7.50% and maturity dates ranging from October 2011 to July 2013.

Fair Values of Derivative Instruments:

The table below presents the fair value of the Company’s derivative financial instruments as well as their classification on the consolidated balance sheets as of September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 (in thousands):

 

          Fair Value as of  
    

Balance Sheet Location

   September 30, 2011     December 31, 2010  

Derivatives in cash flow hedging relationships:

       

Interest rate swaps (a)

  

Accounts payable and accrued expenses

   $ (44,691   $ (86,166

Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments:

       

Interest rate swaps (a)

  

Accounts payable and accrued expenses

   $ (25,567   $ (12,164

Interest rate caps

  

Accounts payable and accrued expenses

   $ —        $ —     

 

(a) This liability is based on an aggregate termination value of $(73,802,000) and $(105,657,000) excluding accrued interest and includes a CVA of $3,544,000 and $7,327,000 as of September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively.

 

27


Table of Contents

STRATEGIC HOTELS & RESORTS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

 

The Company does not have any fair value measurements using inputs based on quoted prices in active markets (Level 1 or Level 2) as of September 30, 2011 or December 31, 2010. The following table reflects changes in interest rate swap liabilities categorized as Level 3 for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010 (in thousands):

 

Balance as of January 1, 2011

   $ (98,330

Interest rate swap terminations (b)

     33,311   

Mark to market adjustments

     (5,239
  

 

 

 

Balance as of September 30, 2011

   $ (70,258
  

 

 

 

Balance as of January 1, 2010

   $ (63,755

Interest rate swap terminations (b)

     7,212   

Interest rate swap buy downs (c)

     28,063   

Mark to market adjustments

     (85,514

Less liabilities of assets held for sale

     8,068   
  

 

 

 

Balance as of September 30, 2010

   $ (105,926
  

 

 

 

 

(b) In June 2011, the Company paid $29,672,000, which included accrued interest of $253,000 and termination fees of $29,000, to terminate five interest rates swaps. In February 2011, the Company paid transaction fees of $4,201,000, which included accrued interest of $280,000, to terminate three interest rate swaps. In May and June 2010, the Company paid $7,212,000 to terminate five interest rate swaps.

 

(c) During the nine months ended September 30, 2010, the Company paid transaction fees of $24,672,000 to buy down certain domestic interest rate swap fixed pay rates. The modified swaps had effective dates of February 15, 2010 and were designated as cash flow hedges at the time of the buy down transaction. The transaction fees were recorded in accumulated OCL and were being reclassified into earnings over the life of the swaps. As a result of the interest rate swap terminations noted above, the Company recognized immediately into earnings a portion of transaction fees recorded in accumulated OCL related to interest rates swaps that were designated to hedge transactions that are no longer probable of occurring.

During the nine months ended September 30, 2010, the Company paid $3,268,000 to buy down a EURIBOR interest rate swap fixed pay rate from 4.53% to 3.32% for the period from March 2010 through March 2015. The modified swap remained designated as a cash flow hedge and any amounts in accumulated OCL existing from the original transaction were reclassified into earnings over the life of the swap. On December 15, 2010, the Company sold the InterContinental Prague. The EURIBOR interest rate swap related to the hotel was assigned to the third party buyer as part of the transaction. Amounts related to this interest rate swap were eliminated from the Company’s consolidated financial statements at the time the transaction closed.

 

28


Table of Contents

STRATEGIC HOTELS & RESORTS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

 

Effect of Derivative Instruments on the Statements of Operations:

The tables below present the effect of the Company’s derivative financial instruments on the statements of operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010 (in thousands):

 

     Three Months Ended     Nine Months Ended  
     September 30,     September 30,  
     2011     2010     2011     2010  
Derivatives in Cash Flow Hedging Relationships         

Interest rate swaps:

        

Effective portion of loss recognized in accumulated OCL

   $ (6,500   $ (22,669   $ (15,289   $ (87,757

Effective portion of loss reclassified into interest expense – continuing operations

   $ (6,199   $ (8,866   $ (24,717   $ (31,768

Effective portion of loss reclassified into interest expense – discontinued operations

   $ —        $ (1,990   $ —        $ (5,451

Effective portion of loss reclassified into loss on early termination of derivative financial instruments

   $ —        $ —        $ (27,440   $ (15,542

Ineffective portion of loss recognized in interest expense – continuing operations

   $ (834   $ (393   $ (5,396   $ (1,238

Ineffective portion of loss recognized in interest expense – discontinued operations

   $ —        $ (27   $ —        $ (980

Mark to market loss recognized in loss on early termination of derivative financial instruments

   $ —        $ —        $ (1,802   $ (2,721

 

     Three Months Ended     Nine Months Ended  
     September 30,     September 30,  
      2011     2010     2011     2010  
Derivatives Not Designated as Hedging Instruments         

Interest rate swaps:

        

Ineffective losses recognized in interest expense

   $ (3,562   $ (3,374   $ (8,590   $ (4,547

Interest rate caps:

        

Gain (loss) recognized in other income, net

   $ 4      $ (110   $ (19   $ (161

Credit-risk-related Contingent Features:

The Company has agreements with each of its derivative counterparties that contain a provision where if the Company defaults and its indebtedness is accelerated or declared due or capable of being accelerated or declared due, then the Company could also be declared in default on its derivative obligations associated with the relevant indebtedness.

As of September 30, 2011, the termination value of derivatives in a net liability position, which includes accrued interest but excludes any CVA, related to these agreements was $(75,857,000). As of September 30, 2011, the Company has not posted any collateral related to these agreements. If the Company had breached any of these provisions at September 30, 2011, it would have been required to settle its obligations under the agreements at their termination value of $(75,857,000). The Company has not breached any of the provisions as of September 30, 2011.

10. SHARE-BASED EMPLOYEE COMPENSATION PLANS

On June 21, 2004, the Company adopted the 2004 Incentive Plan (the Plan). The Plan provided for the grant of equity-based awards in the form of, among others, Options, RSUs, and stock appreciation rights (SARs), which are collectively referred to as the Awards. On May 22, 2008, SHR’s shareholders approved SHR’s Amended and Restated 2004 Incentive Plan (the Amended Plan). The Amended Plan: (a) added OP Units as an additional type of award; (b) adjusted the number of authorized shares from 3,000,000 shares of SHR common stock to 4,200,000 shares of SHR common stock or OP Units; (c) limited the maximum term of

 

29


Table of Contents

STRATEGIC HOTELS & RESORTS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

 

Options and SARs to no more than 10 years and prohibited the repricing of Options and SARs; and (d) established minimum vesting periods for certain awards. On May 19, 2011, SHR’s shareholders approved the Company’s Second Amended and Restated 2004 Incentive Plan (the Amended and Restated Plan) pursuant to which the number of securities authorized and reserved for issuance increased from 4,200,000 shares of SHR common stock or OP Units to 9,700,000 shares of SHR common stock or OP Units. The termination date of the Amended and Restated Plan was also extended from June 21, 2014 to December 31, 2016.

RSUs:

The Company recorded compensation expense of $724,000 and $435,000 related to RSUs and performance-based RSUs (net of estimated forfeitures) for the three months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively, and $2,698,000 and $1,530,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. The compensation expense is recorded in corporate expenses on the accompanying consolidated statements of operations. As of September 30, 2011, there was unrecognized compensation expense of $3,612,000 related to nonvested RSUs and $270,000 related to performance-based RSUs granted under the Amended and Restated Plan. That cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 2.00 years for nonvested RSUs and 0.25 years for performance-based RSUs.

Value Creation Plan:

On August 27, 2009, the Company adopted the Value Creation Plan to further align the interests and efforts of key employees to the interests of the Company’s stockholders in creating stockholder value and providing key employees an added incentive to work towards the Company’s growth and success. The Value Creation Plan provides for up to 2.5% of SHR’s market capitalization (limited to a maximum market capitalization based on a common stock price of $20.00 per share) to be provided to participants in the Value Creation Plan in 2012 if the highest average closing price of SHR’s common stock during certain consecutive twenty trading day periods in 2012 is at least $4.00 (Normal Distribution Amount). In addition, if a change of control occurs at any time prior to December 31, 2012, participants in the Value Creation Plan will generally not be entitled to the Normal Distribution Amount and will instead be entitled to receive 2.5% of SHR’s market capitalization based on the value of a share of SHR’s common stock upon the change of control (Change of Control Price), regardless of whether the Change of Control Price is at least $4.00 or greater than $20.00. A total of up to one million units payable under the Company’s Value Creation Plan (VCP Units) (representing the opportunity to earn an amount equal to 2.5% of SHR’s market capitalization) can be allocated under the Value Creation Plan to key employees. As of September 30, 2011, all one million VCP Units have been granted under the Value Creation Plan. Payments may be made in cash, in shares of SHR’s common stock (subject to approval by the stockholders of the Company), in some combination thereof or in any other manner approved by the committee of the board administering the Value Creation Plan. On May 23, 2011, the Company adopted an amendment to the Value Creation Plan (the VCP Amendment). Pursuant to the terms of the VCP Amendment, the 10,798,846 shares of SHR’s common stock that were issued on June 24, 2011 in connection with the Company’s acquisition of interests in the InterContinental Chicago hotel (see note 8) will not be included in the calculation of SHR’s market capitalization as set forth in the Value Creation Plan.

Deferral Program:

On June 29, 2011, the Company and its president and chief executive officer, Laurence S. Geller, entered into the Strategic Hotels & Resorts, Inc. Value Creation Plan Normal Unit Distributions Deferral Election and Deferral Program (Deferral Program). Pursuant to the Deferral Program, Mr. Geller elected to defer up to 50% of his share of the Normal Distribution Amount that may be paid pursuant to the Value Creation Plan currently contemplated to be paid in cash within 30 days after the end of each 2012 calendar quarter and to have such Normal Distribution Amount instead be converted into stock units on the basis of the fair market value of a share of SHR common stock at the time the Normal Distribution Amount would otherwise have been paid. Each stock unit under the Deferral Program will be converted on a one-for-one basis into a share of SHR common stock on January 2, 2014 or if earlier, upon a change of control of the Company or the first business day of the calendar month following six months after Mr. Geller’s termination of employment.

 

30


Table of Contents

STRATEGIC HOTELS & RESORTS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

 

Prior to the Deferral Program, the Company accounted for the entire Value Creation Plan as a liability award because of its cash settlement feature and recorded the liability in accounts payable and accrued expenses. At the deferral election date, the Company bifurcated the Value Creation Plan and began accounting for the portion of the award payable in stock units as an equity award and continued accounting for the portion of the award payable in cash as a liability award. For the equity award, the Company established a fair value of $13,050,000 and reclassified $8,894,000 from accounts payable and accrued expenses to additional paid-in capital, which represented amounts previously recognized as compensation expense. The remaining balance will be recognized as compensation expense over the remaining derived service period. The fair value of the liability award is re-measured at the end of each reporting period, and the Company makes adjustments to the compensation expense and liability to reflect the fair value.

The unrecognized compensation expense related to the equity component of the award at September 30, 2011, was $2,909,000, which is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 0.58 years. The fair value of the liability component of the award at September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 was $11,659,000 and $12,722,000, respectively. Total compensation (credit) expense recognized in corporate expenses on the accompanying consolidated statements of operations under the Value Creation Plan for the three months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010 was $(6,921,000) and $3,845,000, respectively, and $9,078,000 and $6,872,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively.

11. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

On August 16, 2007, the Company entered into a consulting agreement with Sir David M.C. Michels, a member of SHR’s board of directors. On August 5, 2009, the Company and Mr. Michels agreed to terminate the consulting agreement. All prior grants made by the Company to Mr. Michels pursuant to the consulting agreement vested on August 21, 2011. For the three months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, the Company recognized a (credit) expense of $(25,000) and $24,000, respectively, and for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010 recognized expense of $1,000 and $64,000, respectively, in corporate expenses on the consolidated statements of operations related to the consulting agreement.

12. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

Environmental Matters:

Generally, the properties acquired by the Company have been subjected to environmental reviews. While some of these assessments have led to further investigation and sampling, none of the environmental assessments have revealed, nor is the Company aware of any environmental liability that it believes would have a material adverse effect on its business or financial statements.

Litigation:

The Company is party to various claims and routine litigation arising in the ordinary course of business. Based on discussions with legal counsel, the Company does not believe that the results of these claims and litigation, individually or in the aggregate, will have a material adverse effect on its business or financial statements.

Letters of Credit:

As of September 30, 2011, the Company provided $500,000 in letters of credit related to its corporate office space lease and $1,600,000 in connection with an obligation to complete certain repairs to the underground parking garage at the Four Seasons Washington, D.C. hotel.

Construction Contracts:

The Company has executed various contracts related to construction activities. As of September 30, 2011, the Company’s obligations under these contracts amounted to approximately $4,437,000. The construction activities are expected to be completed in 2011 and 2012.

 

31


Table of Contents

STRATEGIC HOTELS & RESORTS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

 

13. FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

As of September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the carrying amounts of certain financial instruments employed by the Company, including cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, and accounts payable and accrued expenses were representative of their fair values because of the short-term maturity of these instruments.

At September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the fair value of the fixed-rate mortgage and other debt, including the recently refinanced mortgage secured by the InterContinental Chicago approximated the carrying value of $464,226,000 and $317,750,000, respectively. In addition, the fair value of new or recently refinanced variable-rate debt, which included the Company’s bank credit facility and mortgage loans secured by the Four Seasons Washington, D.C., the Loews Santa Monica Beach Hotel, and the InterContinental Miami approximated the carrying value of $325,000,000 at September 30, 2011.

To calculate the estimated fair value of the remaining variable-rate mortgage debt as of September 30, 2011, the Company estimated that the current market spread over the applicable index (LIBOR or GBP LIBOR, as applicable) would be in the range of 350 to 400 basis points as compared to the current contractual spread as disclosed (see note 7). Using these estimated market spreads, the Company estimated the fair value of the remaining variable-rate mortgage debt to be approximately $7,000,000 to $9,000,000 lower than the total carrying value of $211,480,000. For every 100 basis point change in the assumed market spread, the corresponding change in the fair value of the total variable-rate debt would be approximately $3,000,000.

To calculate the estimated fair value of the variable-rate mortgage debt and bank credit facility as of December 31, 2010, the Company estimated that the market spread over the applicable index (LIBOR or GBP LIBOR, as applicable) would be in the range of 400 to 600 basis points as compared to the contractual spread as disclosed (see note 7). Using these estimated market spreads, the Company estimated the fair value of the variable-rate mortgage debt and bank credit facility to be approximately $31,000,000 to $50,000,000 lower than the total carrying value of $828,531,000. For every 100 basis point change in the assumed market spread, the corresponding change in the fair value of the total variable-rate debt would be approximately $10,000,000.

14. GEOGRAPHIC AND BUSINESS SEGMENT INFORMATION

The Company operates in one reportable business segment, hotel ownership. As of September 30, 2011, the Company’s foreign operations (excluding discontinued operations) and long-lived assets (excluding assets held for sale) consisted of one Mexican hotel property, two Mexican development sites, a 31% interest in a Mexican unconsolidated affiliate, and two European properties, including a leasehold interest in a German hotel property.

The following tables present revenues (excluding unconsolidated affiliates and discontinued operations) and long-lived assets (excluding assets held for sale) for the geographical areas in which the Company operates (in thousands):

 

     Three Months Ended      Nine Months Ended  
     September 30,      September 30,  
     2011      2010      2011      2010  

Revenues:

           

United States

   $ 174,378       $ 152,744       $ 516,303       $ 445,532   

Mexico

     4,456         5,618         23,611         28,226   

Europe

     11,072         10,531         30,010         28,007   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total

   $ 189,906       $ 168,893       $ 569,924       $ 501,765   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

32


Table of Contents

STRATEGIC HOTELS & RESORTS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

 

     September 30,
2011
     December 31,
2010
 

Long-lived Assets:

  

United States

   $ 1,509,718       $ 1,631,637   

Mexico

     169,837         173,050   

Europe

     99,903         103,743   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total

   $ 1,779,458       $ 1,908,430   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

15. MANAGEMENT AGREEMENTS

The Company has amended terms of its management agreements with various hotel operators. Consideration resulting from these amendments, including amounts previously recognized as termination liabilities, are classified as deferred credits and will be recognized ratably in earnings (as an offset to management fee expense) over the expected remaining initial terms of the respective management agreements. At September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, deferred credits of $7,642,000 and $8,276,000, respectively, were included in accounts payable and accrued expenses on the consolidated balance sheets.

Asset Management Agreements

The Company has entered into asset management agreements with unaffiliated third parties to provide asset management services to four hotels not owned by the Company. On March 11, 2011, the Company purchased two of these hotels (see note 3) and terminated the respective asset management agreements. Under the remaining agreements, the Company earns base management fees and has the potential to earn additional incentive fees. The Company recognized fees of $100,000 and $238,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively, and fees of $300,000 and $794,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively, under these agreements, which are included in other income, net in the consolidated statements of operations.

 

33


Table of Contents
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS.

Note on Forward-Looking Statements

On one or more occasions, we may make statements regarding our assumptions, projections, expectations, targets, intentions or beliefs about future events. All statements other than statements of historical facts included or incorporated by reference in this Form 10-Q are forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act).

Words or phrases such as “anticipates,” “believes,” “estimates,” “expects,” “intends,” “may,” “plans,” “potential,” “predicts,” “projects,” “should,” “targets,” “will,” “will continue,” “will likely result” or other comparable expressions or the negative of these words or phrases identify forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements reflect our current views about future events and are subject to risks, uncertainties, assumptions and changes in circumstances that may cause actual results or outcomes to differ materially from those expressed in any forward-looking statement. We caution that while we make such statements in good faith and we believe such statements are based on reasonable assumptions, including without limitation, management’s examination of historical operating trends, data contained in records and other data available from third parties, we cannot assure you that our projections will be achieved.

Some important factors that could cause actual results or outcomes for us to differ materially from these forward-looking statements are discussed in the cautionary statements contained in Exhibit 99.1 to this Form 10-Q, which are incorporated herein by reference. In assessing forward-looking statements contained herein, readers are urged to read carefully all cautionary statements contained in this Form 10-Q.

Overview

We were incorporated in Maryland in January 2004 to acquire and asset-manage upper upscale and luxury hotels (as defined by Smith Travel Research). Our accounting predecessor, Strategic Hotel Capital, L.L.C. (SHC LLC) was founded in 1997 by Laurence Geller, our president and chief executive officer, Goldman, Sachs & Co.’s Whitehall Fund and others. We made an election to be taxed as a real estate investment trust (REIT) under Sections 856 through 860 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the Tax Code). On June 29, 2004, we completed our initial public offering (IPO) of our common stock. Prior to the IPO, 21 hotel interests were owned by SHC LLC. Concurrent with and as part of the transactions relating to the IPO, a reverse spin-off distribution to shareholders separated SHC LLC into two companies, a new, privately-held SHC LLC, with interests, at that time, in seven hotels, and Strategic Hotels & Resorts, Inc. (SHR), a public entity with interests, at that time, in 14 hotels. See “Item 1. Financial Statements — 1. General” for the hotel interests owned or leased by us as of September 30, 2011.

We operate as a self-administered and self-managed REIT, which means that we are managed by our board of directors and executive officers. A REIT is a legal entity that holds real estate interests and, through payments of dividends to stockholders, is permitted to reduce or avoid federal income taxes at the corporate level. To continue to qualify as a REIT, we cannot operate hotels; instead we employ internationally known hotel management companies to operate our hotels under management contracts. We conduct our operations through our direct and indirect subsidiaries including our operating partnership, Strategic Hotel Funding, L.L.C. (SH Funding), which currently holds substantially all of our assets. We are the managing member of SH Funding and hold approximately 99% of its membership units as of September 30, 2011. We manage all business aspects of SH Funding, including the sale and purchase of hotels, the investment in these hotels and the financing of SH Funding and its assets.

Throughout this “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” section, references to “we”, “our”, “us”, and “the Company” are references to SHR together, except as the context otherwise requires, with its consolidated subsidiaries, including SH Funding.

 

34


Table of Contents

When presenting the dollar equivalent amount for any amounts expressed in a foreign currency, the dollar equivalent amount has been computed based on the exchange rate on the date of the transaction or the exchange rate prevailing on September 30, 2011, as applicable, unless otherwise noted.

Key Indicators of Operating Performance

We evaluate the operating performance of our business using a variety of operating and other information that includes financial information prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAP) such as total revenues, operating income (loss), net income (loss), and earnings per share, as well as non-GAAP financial information. In addition, we use other information that may not be financial in nature, including statistical information and comparative data. We use this information to measure the performance of individual hotels, groups of hotels, and/or our business as a whole. Key indicators that we evaluate include average daily occupancy, average daily rate (ADR), revenue per available room (RevPAR), and Total RevPAR, which are more fully discussed under “- Factors Affecting Our Results of Operations – Revenues.” We also evaluate Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation and Amortization (EBITDA), Comparable EBITDA, Funds from Operations (FFO), FFO-Fully Diluted, and Comparable FFO as supplemental non-GAAP measures to GAAP performance measures. We provide a more detailed discussion of the non-GAAP financial measures under “-Non-GAAP Financial Measures.”

Outlook

RevPAR and occupancy gains experienced in mid-2010 have continued through the first three quarters of 2011, driven by improved demand from both group and transient business. The lodging industry began its recovery near the end of the first quarter of 2010, after one of the worst downturns in its history. Luxury demand, in which our portfolio has the highest concentration of assets, has experienced positive RevPAR growth beginning with the week of February 20, 2010, following 96 consecutive weeks of negative RevPAR growth.

The third quarter of 2011 represented the seventh consecutive quarter of demand growth and sixth consecutive quarter of RevPAR growth and profit margin expansion for our North American portfolio. Same Store Assets (see “- Total Portfolio and Same Store Asset Definitions” below) located in North America, which excludes hotels acquired this year and hotels owned through unconsolidated affiliates, gained 1.3 percentage points in occupancy, driven by a 4.4% increase in transient room nights compared to the three months ended September 30, 2010. ADR at our hotels increased a strong 9.4% in the quarter, as a result of a 9.1% increase in transient rate and an 8.9% increase in group rate. For the quarter, RevPAR increased 11.1% and Total RevPAR increased 7.7%.

The performance of our asset in Mexico, the Four Seasons Punta Mita Resort, has lagged the recovery of the rest of our portfolio as the hotel continues to be impacted by security concerns in Mexico. For the third quarter of 2011, occupancy at the Four Season Punta Mita Resort declined by 4.2 percentage points leading to a 7.1% decline in RevPAR. RevPAR for our Same Store Assets located in the United States increased 11.7%, driven by a 9.7% increase in ADR and a 1.4 percentage point increase in occupancy, compared to the three months ended September 30, 2010.

As we assess lodging supply/demand dynamics looking forward, we are optimistic about the long-term prospects for a robust and sustained recovery, particularly in the markets in which we own assets. However, in the near term we remain cautious given the current backdrop of global macroeconomic uncertainty. Group bookings pace remains our best forward indicator of demand. For our United States portfolio of hotels, definite group room nights for 2011 are up 6.2% compared to the same time last year and are booked at 5.3% higher rates. For 2012, definite group room nights are up 6.3% compared to the same time last year and are booked at 0.9% higher rates. New supply remains very well contained in our markets and the current significant gap between hotel trading values and replacement costs bodes favorably for very limited supply growth into the future.

 

35


Table of Contents

During the lodging downturn we implemented hotel specific contingency plans designed to reduce costs and maximize efficiency at each hotel. These include, but are not limited to, adjusting variable labor, eliminating certain fixed labor, and reducing the hours of room service operations and other food and beverage outlets. We believe the cost structures of our hotels have been fundamentally redesigned to sustain many of the cost reductions, even during periods of rising lodging demand. Therefore, we are optimistic that improving lodging demand will lead to increases in ADR and drive significant profit margin expansion throughout our portfolio.

Balance Sheet Restructuring

Since the beginning of 2010, we have been in the process of restructuring our balance sheet to decrease our leverage, improve both our short-term and long-term liquidity, and address our near-term debt maturities. This restructuring has been multifaceted and has included asset sales, equity issuances, and recapitalization and refinancing transactions on many of our assets as summarized below:

 

   

We issued 109.9 million shares of common stock in private and public offerings and in connection with the purchase of assets, raising $544.0 million of new equity.

 

   

We tendered for and retired our Exchangeable Notes totaling $180.0 million.

 

   

We sold our interests in the InterContinental Prague, the Paris Marriott Champs Elysees (Paris Marriott), and BuyEfficient generating net proceeds of $67.8 million.

 

   

We recapitalized our investments in the Hotel del Coronado and the Fairmont Scottsdale Princess hotels and restructured the debt on those properties, reducing our pro-rata share of the debt on these assets from $463.5 million to $212.3 million.

 

   

We first extended and then replaced our bank credit facility with a new $300.0 million credit facility with an initial maturity date of June 30, 2014, with an option to extend for an additional year, subject to certain conditions.

 

   

We refinanced $749.5 million of property level mortgage debt scheduled to mature in 2011 and 2012 with new mortgage debt of $787.8 million, with maturity dates ranging from 2014 to 2021 (and 2016 to 2021 assuming extension options are exercised).

As a result of these steps, our total consolidated debt decreased from $1.6 billion at December 31, 2009 to $1.0 billion as of September 30, 2011. Further, as of September 30, 2011, we had approximately $35.0 million of available corporate level cash, not including restricted cash and cash currently held by the hotels, and we had no outstanding borrowings on our $300.0 million bank credit facility, other than $2.1 million in letters of credit outstanding.

Factors Affecting Our Results of Operations

Acquisition and Sale of Interests in Hotel Properties.

On June 24, 2011, we acquired the 49.0% interest in the InterContinental Chicago hotel that was previously owned by DND Hotel JV Private Limited, an affiliate of the Government of Singapore Investment Corporation Pte Ltd., giving us 100% ownership of the InterContinental Chicago hotel. As part of the transaction, we also acquired an additional 2.5% ownership interest in the Hyatt Regency La Jolla hotel, giving us a 53.5% controlling ownership interest in that hotel. Total consideration was approximately $90.2 million, which included the issuance of approximately 10.8 million shares of our common stock at a price of $6.51 per share based on our June 24, 2011 common share closing price, approximately $19.4 million of cash which includes our pro-rata share of working capital and post-closing adjustments of $0.5 million.

 

36


Table of Contents

On June 9, 2011, we completed a recapitalization transaction that changed our ownership interest in the Fairmont Scottsdale Princess hotel. See”—Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements – Fairmont Scottsdale Princess Venture” for further description of this transaction.

On April 6, 2011, we sold our leasehold interest in the Paris Marriott hotel for consideration of €29.2 million ($41.6 million). As part of the transaction, we received €10.1 million ($14.5 million) of an additional €11.6 million ($16.6 million) owed related to the release of a security deposit and other closing adjustments for total proceeds of approximately €40.8 million ($58.2 million). We received the remaining €1.5 million ($2.0 million) on October 11, 2011. This property’s assets and liabilities were classified as held for sale as of December 31, 2010. The results of operations for this property have been classified as discontinued operations for all periods presented.

On March 11, 2011, we acquired the Four Seasons Silicon Valley and the Four Seasons Jackson Hole hotels in exchange for an aggregate of 15.2 million shares of our common stock at a price of $6.08 per share based on our March 11, 2011 common share closing price, or approximately $92.4 million.

On February 4, 2011 we completed a recapitalization transaction that changed our ownership interest in the Hotel del Coronado. See “—Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements – Hotel and North Beach Ventures” for further description of this transaction.

On December 15, 2010, we sold the InterContinental Prague hotel for approximate consideration of €106.1 million ($141.4 million). The consideration included the assignment of the hotel’s third party debt and the interest rate swap liability related to the third party indebtedness. Net proceeds from the sale, after prorations, were approximately $3.6 million. The results of operations for this property have been classified as discontinued operations for all periods presented.

We previously announced our intention to exit our assets in Europe in an orderly process designed to maximize proceeds. Since that time, we sold the Renaissance Paris Hotel LeParc Trocadero, the InterContinental Prague and our leasehold interest in the Paris Marriott. Our remaining European assets are the Marriott London Grosvenor Square and our leasehold interest in the Marriott Hamburg. While we continue to opportunistically explore options to exit these investments and still intend to be North American-centric with respect to any new acquisitions, our two remaining European assets continue to perform well and we are not currently actively marketing either of these assets for sale.

Total Portfolio and Same Store Asset Definitions. We define our Total Portfolio as properties that we wholly or partially own or lease and whose operations are included in our consolidated operating results. The Total Portfolio excludes all sold properties and assets held for sale included in discontinued operations.

We present certain information about our hotel operating results on a comparable hotel basis, which we refer to as our Same Store analysis. We define our Same Store Assets as those hotels (a) that are owned or leased by us, and whose operations are included in our consolidated operating results and (b) for which we reported operating results throughout the entire reporting periods presented.

Our Same Store Assets for purposes of the comparison of the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010 exclude the Four Seasons Silicon Valley hotel, the Four Seasons Jackson Hole hotel, investments in unconsolidated affiliates, and all sold properties and assets held for sale included in discontinued operations.

We present these Same Store Asset results because we believe that doing so provides useful information for evaluating the period-to-period performance of our hotels and facilitates comparisons with other hotel REITs and hotel owners. In particular, these measures assist in distinguishing whether increases or decreases in revenues and/or expenses are due to operations of the Same Store Assets or from acquisition or disposition activity.

 

37


Table of Contents

Revenues. Substantially all of our revenue is derived from the operation of our hotels. Specifically, our revenue for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010 consisted of:

 

     Total Portfolio
% of Total Revenues
    Same Store Assets
%  of Total Revenues
 
     2011     2010     2011     2010  

Revenues:

        

Rooms

     54.4     53.5     55.4     54.6

Food and beverage

     34.4     34.4     34.1     33.5

Other hotel operating revenue

     10.5     11.4     9.7     11.1

Lease revenue

     0.7     0.7     0.8     0.8
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total revenues

     100.0     100.0     100.0     100.0
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

   

Rooms revenue. Occupancy and ADR are the major drivers of rooms revenue.

 

   

Food and beverage revenue. Occupancy, local catering and banquet events are the major drivers of food and beverage revenue.

 

   

Other hotel operating revenue. Other hotel operating revenue consists primarily of cancellation fees, spa, telephone, parking, golf course, Internet access, space rentals, retail and other guest services and is also driven by occupancy.

 

   

Lease revenue. We sublease our interest in the Marriott Hamburg to a third party and earn annual base rent plus additional rent contingent on the hotel meeting performance thresholds.

Changes in our revenues are most easily explained by performance indicators that are used in the hotel real estate industry:

 

   

average daily occupancy;

 

   

ADR;

 

   

RevPAR, which stands for revenue per available room, is equal to rooms revenue divided by the number of rooms available; and

 

   

Total RevPAR, which stands for total revenue per available room, is equal to the sum of rooms revenue, food and beverage revenue and other hotel operating revenue, divided by the number of rooms available.

We generate a significant portion of our revenue from two broad categories of customers, transient and group.

Our transient customers include individual or group business and leisure travelers that occupy fewer than 10 rooms per night. Transient customers accounted for approximately 57.5% and 57.1% of the rooms sold during the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. We divide our transient customers into the following subcategories:

 

   

Transient Leisure – This category generates the highest room rates and includes travelers that receive published rates offered to the general public that do not have access to negotiated or discounted rates.

 

38


Table of Contents
   

Transient Negotiated – This category includes travelers, who are typically associated with companies and organizations that generate high volumes of business, that receive negotiated rates that are lower than the published rates offered to the general public.

Our group customers include groups of 10 or more individuals that occupy 10 or more rooms per night. Group customers accounted for approximately 42.5% and 42.9% of the rooms sold during the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. We divide our group customers into the following subcategories:

 

   

Group Association – This category includes group bookings related to national and regional association meetings and conventions.

 

   

Group Corporate – This category includes group bookings related to corporate business.

 

   

Group Other – This category generally includes group bookings related to social, military, education, religious, fraternal and youth and amateur sports teams.

Fluctuations in revenues, which, for our domestic hotels, historically have been correlated with changes in the United States gross domestic product (U.S. GDP), are driven largely by general economic and local market conditions as well as general health and safety concerns, which in turn affect levels of business and leisure travel. Guest demographics also affect our revenues. During the first three quarters of 2011, demand at our hotels has increased significantly, despite tepid U.S. GDP growth, which we believe reflects the relative health of our primary customer demographics, particularly U.S. based corporations and affluent transient travelers. While hotel demand has improved and luxury hotel demand for the industry is currently at an all-time high, occupancy and ADR metrics for our hotels remain well below prior peak periods given the industry is still in the early stages of recovery.

In addition to economic conditions, supply is another important factor that can affect revenues. Room rates and occupancy tend to fall when supply increases unless the supply growth is offset by an equal or greater increase in demand. One reason we target upper upscale and luxury hotels in select urban and resort markets, including major business centers and leisure destinations, is because they tend to be in locations that have greater supply constraints such as lack of available land, high development costs, long development and entitlement lead times, and brand trade area restrictions that prevent the addition of a certain brand or brands in close proximity. Nevertheless, our hotels are not insulated from competitive pressures and our hotel operators will lower room rates to compete more aggressively for guests in periods when occupancy declines.

For purposes of calculating our Total Portfolio RevPAR for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, we exclude unconsolidated affiliates, discontinued operations, and the Marriott Hamburg because we sublease the operations of the hotel and only record lease revenue. Same Store Assets RevPAR is calculated in the same manner as Total Portfolio RevPAR but also excludes the Four Seasons Silicon Valley and the Four Seasons Jackson Hole hotels for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011. These methods for calculating RevPAR each period are consistently applied through the remainder of this “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and should be taken into consideration wherever RevPAR results are disclosed.

 

39


Table of Contents

Hotel Operating Expenses. Our hotel operating expenses for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010 consisted of the costs and expenses to provide hotel services, including:

 

     Total Portfolio
% of Total Hotel Operating
Expenses
    Same Store
Assets

% of Total Hotel
Operating
Expenses
 
     2011     2010     2011     2010  

Hotel Operating Expenses:

        

Rooms

     19.4     19.3     20.0     19.9

Food and beverage

     32.2     30.6     32.7     30.8

Other departmental expenses

     35.3     36.0     34.7     35.5

Management fees

     4.1     4.2     3.9     4.0

Other hotel expenses

     9.0     9.9     8.7     9.8
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total hotel operating expenses

     100.0     100.0     100.0     100.0
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

   

Rooms expense. Occupancy is a major driver of rooms expense, which has a significant correlation with rooms revenue.

 

   

Food and beverage expense. Occupancy, local catering and banquet events are the major drivers of food and beverage expense, which has a significant correlation with food and beverage revenue.

 

   

Other departmental expenses. Other departmental expenses consist of general and administrative, marketing, repairs and maintenance, utilities and expenses related to earning other operating revenue.

 

   

Management fees. We pay base and incentive management fees to our hotel operators. Base management fees are computed as a percentage of revenue. Incentive management fees are incurred when operating profits exceed levels prescribed in our management agreements.

 

   

Other hotel expenses. Other hotel expenses consist primarily of insurance costs and property taxes.

Salaries, wages and related benefits are included within the categories of hotel operating expenses described above and represented approximately 48.7% and 47.9% of the Total Portfolio total hotel operating expenses for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively.

Most categories of variable operating expenses, such as utilities and certain labor such as housekeeping, fluctuate with changes in occupancy. Increases in RevPAR attributable to increases in occupancy are accompanied by increases in most categories of variable operating costs and expenses while increases in RevPAR attributable to increases in ADR typically only result in increases in limited categories of operating costs and expenses, such as management fees charged by our operators, which are based on hotel revenues. Thus, changes in ADR have a more significant impact on operating margins.

Lease expense. As a result of the sale-leaseback transaction applicable to the Marriott Hamburg hotel, we recorded lease expense in our statements of operations. In conjunction with the sale-leaseback transaction, we also record a deferred gain, which is amortized as an offset to lease expense.

Corporate expenses. Corporate expenses include payroll and related costs, professional fees, travel expenses and office rent.

 

40


Table of Contents

Recent Events. In addition to the acquisition and sale of interests in hotel properties noted above, we expect that the following events will cause our future results of operations to differ from our historical performance:

Common Stock. On March 11, 2011, we issued 8.0 million shares of our common stock to an affiliate of the seller of the Four Seasons Silicon Valley and Four Seasons Jackson Hole hotels in a private placement at a price of $6.25 per share for approximate net proceeds of $49.7 million after expenses. These proceeds were used to repay existing indebtedness under the previous bank credit facility.

On May 19, 2010, we completed a public offering of 75.9 million shares of common stock at a price of $4.60 per share. After discounts, commissions, and expenses, we raised net proceeds of approximately $331.8 million. These proceeds were used to fund the cash tender offer of the 3.50% Exchangeable Senior Notes due 2012 (Exchangeable Notes) and repay existing indebtedness under the previous bank credit facility.

New Bank Credit Facility. On June 30, 2011, we entered into a new $300.0 million secured, bank credit facility, which also includes a $100.0 million accordion feature. This new facility replaced the $350.0 million secured bank credit facility that was set to expire in March 2012. The facility’s interest rate is based upon a leverage-based pricing grid ranging from London InterBank Offered Rate (LIBOR) plus 275 basis points to LIBOR plus 375 basis points. The facility’s current interest rate is LIBOR plus 300 basis points, a reduction from the previous facility’s pricing of LIBOR plus 375 basis points. The facility expires on June 30, 2014, with a one-year extension available, subject to certain conditions. See “—Liquidity and Capital Resources-Bank credit facility”.

Termination and De-Designation of Cash Flow Hedges. On June 20, 2011, we paid $29.7 million to terminate five interest rate swaps with a combined notional amount of $300.0 million. We recorded a charge of $27.3 million, which included the immediate write-off of $25.5 million previously recorded in accumulated other comprehensive loss (OCL) related to interest rates swaps that were designated to hedge cash flows that are no longer probable of occurring and $1.8 million of mark to market adjustments related to the terminated interest rate swaps. The charge was recorded in loss on early termination of derivative financial instruments in the consolidated statements of operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2011. In addition, based on changes in the forecasted levels of LIBOR-based debt, we de-designated one interest rate swap with a notional amount of $100.0 million as a cash flow hedge. We recorded a charge of $2.0 million to write off amounts previously recorded in accumulated OCL related to this swap. The charge was recorded in loss on early termination of derivative financial instruments in the consolidated statements of operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2011. Changes in the market value of the interest rate swap will be recorded in earnings subsequent to the de-designation.

On February 11, 2011, we paid approximately $4.2 million to terminate three interest rate swaps with a combined notional amount of $125.0 million. There were no immediate charges to earnings based on our forecasted levels of LIBOR-based debt at the time of the transaction.

In May and June 2010, we paid approximately $7.2 million to terminate five interest rate swaps with a combined notional amount of $300.0 million. We recorded a charge of $18.3 million, which included the immediate write-off of amounts previously recorded in accumulated OCL related to these swaps, in loss on early termination of derivative financial instruments in the consolidated statements of operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2010. In addition, based on changes in the forecasted levels of LIBOR-based debt, we de-designated one interest rate swap with a notional amount of $100.0 million as a cash flow hedge. Subsequent changes in the market value of the interest swap are recorded in earnings.

 

41


Table of Contents

Mortgage Loan Agreements. On July 28, 2011, we refinanced and increased the loan secured by the InterContinental Chicago hotel to $145.0 million with interest payable monthly at an annual fixed rate of 5.61% and a maturity date of August 1, 2021.

On July 20, 2011, we executed a mortgage agreement in the amount of $130.0 million, which is secured by the Four Seasons Washington, D.C. hotel, that has interest payable monthly at one-month LIBOR plus 3.15% and has a maturity date of July 20, 2014, with two, one-year extension options, subject to certain conditions.

On July 14, 2011, we refinanced and decreased the loan secured by the Loews Santa Monica Beach Hotel to $110.0 million with interest payable monthly at one-month LIBOR plus 3.85%. The loan has a maturity date of July 14, 2015, with three, one-year extension options, subject to certain conditions.

On July 6, 2011, we refinanced and decreased the loan secured by the InterContinental Miami hotel to $85.0 million with interest payable monthly at one-month LIBOR plus 3.50%. The loan has a maturity date of July 6, 2016, with two, one-year extension options, subject to certain conditions.

On June 29, 2011, we repaid the $76.5 million mortgage loan secured by the Ritz-Carlton Half Moon Bay hotel, which became one of the borrowing base properties under the $300.0 million bank credit facility agreement.

On May 5, 2010, we refinanced the loans secured by the Fairmont Chicago and Westin St. Francis hotels. Prior to the refinancing, the two loans included a $220.0 million loan secured by the Westin St. Francis hotel and a $123.8 million loan secured by the Fairmont Chicago hotel. The refinanced loans are cross-collateralized with a total principal amount of $317.8 million, allocated $220.0 million to the Westin St. Francis and $97.8 million to the Fairmont Chicago. Principal of $26.0 million related to the Fairmont Chicago was repaid at the time of the refinancing. The loans were converted from LIBOR-based variable-rate loans to fixed-rate loans with interest payable monthly at an annual interest rate of 6.09%. The maturities of the loans have been extended until 2017.

Cash Tender Offer of Exchangeable Notes. On May 10, 2010, we announced a cash tender offer to purchase any and all of the Exchangeable Notes outstanding. On June 7, 2010, we completed the tender offer and accepted for purchase, at par, $180.0 million of the principal amount of our outstanding Exchangeable Notes. The aggregate consideration for the Exchangeable Notes accepted for purchase was approximately $181.2 million, which included accrued and unpaid interest of approximately $1.2 million.

Sale of Interest in BuyEfficient. On January 21, 2011, we sold our 50.0% interest in BuyEfficient for $9.0 million and recognized a gain of $2.6 million.

 

42


Table of Contents

Comparison of Three Months Ended September 30, 2011 to Three Months Ended September 30, 2010

Operating Results

The following table presents the operating results for the three months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, including the amount and percentage change in these results between the two periods of our Total Portfolio and Same Store Assets (in thousands, except operating data).

 

     Total Portfolio     Same Store Assets  
     2011     2010     Change ($)
Favorable/
(Unfavorable)
    Change (%)
Favorable/
(Unfavorable)
    2011     2010     Change ($)
Favorable/
(Unfavorable)
    Change (%)
Favorable/
(Unfavorable)
 

Revenues:

                

Rooms

   $ 110,048      $ 94,995      $ 15,053        15.8   $ 101,024      $ 91,457      $ 9,567        10.5

Food and beverage

     58,664        54,028        4,636        8.6     53,785        50,215        3,570        7.1

Other hotel operating revenue

     19,939        18,762        1,177        6.4     16,019        17,282        (1,263     (7.3 )% 

Lease revenue

     1,255        1,108        147        13.3     1,255        1,108        147        13.3
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

     

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

Total revenues

     189,906        168,893        21,013        12.4     172,083        160,062        12,021        7.5

Operating Costs and Expenses:

                

Hotel operating expenses

     144,537        135,855        (8,682     (6.4 )%      130,486        123,879        (6,607     (5.3 )% 

Lease expense

     1,249        1,106        (143     (12.9 )%      1,249        1,106        (143     (12.9 )% 

Depreciation and amortization

     25,526        32,209        6,683        20.7     24,095        25,971        1,876        7.2

Corporate expenses

     (2,228     8,679        10,907        125.7     —          —          —          —     
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

     

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

Total operating costs and expenses

     169,084        177,849        8,765        4.9     155,830        150,956        (4,874     (3.2 )% 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

     

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

Operating income (loss)

     20,822        (8,956     29,778        332.5   $ 16,253      $ 9,106      $ 7,147        78.5
          

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

Interest expense, net

     (21,797     (22,054     257        1.2        

Loss on early extinguishment of debt

     (399     (39     (360     (923.1 )%         

Equity in (losses) earnings of unconsolidated affiliates

     (1,867     3,001        (4,868     (162.2 )%         

Foreign currency exchange loss

     (209     (132     (77     (58.3 )%         

Other income, net

     355        1,605        (1,250     (77.9 )%         
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

           

Loss before income taxes and discontinued operations

     (3,095     (26,575     23,480        88.4        

Income tax expense

     (867     (68     (799     (1,175.0 )%         
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

           

Loss from continuing operations

     (3,962     (26,643     22,681        85.1        

Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax

     19        (4,143     4,162        100.5        
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

           

Net loss

     (3,943     (30,786     26,843        87.2        

Net loss attributable to the noncontrolling interests in SHR’s operating partnership

     16        192        (176     (91.7 )%         

Net income attributable to the noncontrolling interests in consolidated affiliates

     (254     (1,086     832        76.6        
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

           

Net loss attributable to SHR

   $ (4,181   $ (31,680   $ 27,499        86.8        
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

           

Reconciliation of Same Store Assets Operating Income to Total Portfolio Operating Income (Loss):

  

   

Same Store Assets operating income

           $ 16,253      $ 9,106      $ 7,147        78.5

Corporate expenses

             2,228        (8,679     10,907        125.7

Corporate depreciation and amortization

             (350     (379     29        7.7

Non-Same Store Assets operating income (loss)

             2,691        (9,004     11,695        129.9
          

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

Total Portfolio operating income (loss)

           $ 20,822      $ (8,956   $ 29,778        332.5
          

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

Operating Data (1):

                

Number of hotels

     15        14            13        13       

Number of rooms

     6,356        6,681            6,032        6,032       

 

(1) Operating data includes the leasehold interest in Marriott Hamburg and excludes unconsolidated affiliates and properties included in discontinued operations.

 

43


Table of Contents

Rooms. For the Total Portfolio, rooms revenue increased $15.1 million, or 15.8%, for the three months ended September 30, 2011 from the three months ended September 30, 2010. RevPAR from our Total Portfolio for the three months ended September 30, 2011 increased by 22.1% from the three months ended September 30, 2010. The components of RevPAR from our Total Portfolio for the three months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010 are summarized as follows:

 

     Three Months Ended
September 30,
 
     2011     2010     Change (%)
Favorable/
(Unfavorable)
 

Occupancy

     78.14     73.77     5.9

ADR

   $ 253.29      $ 219.75        15.3

RevPAR

   $ 197.91      $ 162.12        22.1

Our Same Store Assets contributed to a $9.6 million, or 10.5%, increase in rooms revenue, which is more fully explained below as part of our rooms revenue Same Store Assets analysis. RevPAR from our Same Store Assets for the three months ended September 30, 2011 increased by 10.5% from the three months ended September 30, 2010. The components of RevPAR from our Same Store Assets for the three months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010 are summarized as follows:

 

     Three Months Ended
September 30,
 
     2011     2010     Change (%)
Favorable/
(Unfavorable)
 

Occupancy

     78.34     77.10     1.6

ADR

   $ 245.04      $ 225.42        8.7

RevPAR

   $ 191.97      $ 173.79        10.5

The increase in RevPAR for the Same Store Assets resulted from the combination of an 8.7% increase in ADR and a 1.24 percentage-point increase in occupancy. Rooms revenue increased at all but one of our Same Store Assets for the three months ended September 30, 2011 when compared to the three months ended September 30, 2010 due to improving market conditions. The Four Seasons Punta Mita Resort was the only consolidated hotel that experienced a decrease in rooms revenue due to declining demand resulting from safety concerns in Mexico.

The increase in Total Portfolio rooms revenue also includes $9.0 million of additional rooms revenue generated by the Four Seasons Silicon Valley and the Four Seasons Jackson Hole hotels that we acquired in March 2011, which was partially offset by a decrease of $3.5 million in rooms revenue related to the Fairmont Scottsdale Princess hotel, which became an unconsolidated affiliate in the second quarter of 2011 (see “—Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements – Fairmont Scottsdale Princess Venture”).

Food and Beverage. Food and beverage revenue increased $4.6 million, or 8.6%, for the Total Portfolio when comparing the three months ended September 30, 2011 to the three months ended September 30, 2010. Our Same Store Assets contributed to a $3.6 million, or 7.1%, increase in food and beverage revenue. The primary factor increasing food and beverage revenue at the Same Store Assets was an increase in revenues at our hotels’ food and beverage outlets, which included increased revenues at the Westin St. Francis hotel resulting from a change in the terms of a restaurant agreement, and the opening of the Michael Jordan Steakhouse at the InterContinental Chicago hotel. The increase in Total Portfolio food and beverage revenue also includes $4.8 million of additional revenue generated by the Four Seasons Silicon Valley and the Four Seasons Jackson Hole hotels, which we acquired in March 2011. These increases in Total Portfolio food and beverage revenue were partially offset by a $3.8 million decrease in food and beverage revenue related to the Fairmont Scottsdale Princess hotel, which became an unconsolidated affiliate in the second quarter of 2011.

 

44


Table of Contents

Other Hotel Operating Revenue. Other hotel operating revenue at the Total Portfolio increased $1.2 million, or 6.3%, for the three months ended September 30, 2011 from the three months ended September 30, 2010. The increase in Total Portfolio other hotel operating revenue includes $3.9 million of additional revenue generated by the Four Seasons Silicon Valley and the Four Seasons Jackson Hole hotels that we acquired in March 2011, which was partially offset by a $1.4 million decrease in other hotel operating revenue related to the Fairmont Scottsdale Princess hotel, which became an unconsolidated affiliate in the second quarter of 2011. In addition, there was a decrease in of $1.3 million, or 7.3%, in other hotel operating revenue related to the Same Store Assets, which was primarily due lower cancellation and attrition revenues and lower occupancy at the Four Seasons Punta Mita Resort.

Hotel Operating Expenses. The following table presents the components of our hotel operating expenses for the three months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, including the amount and percentage changes in these expenses between the two periods (in thousands):

 

     Total Portfolio     Same Store Assets  
     2011      2010      Change($)
Favorable/
(Unfavorable)
    Change (%)
Favorable/
(Unfavorable)
    2011      2010      Change($)
Favorable/
(Unfavorable)
    Change (%)
Favorable/
(Unfavorable)
 

Hotel operating expenses:

                    

Rooms

   $ 29,283       $ 27,364       $ (1,919     (7.0 )%    $ 26,969       $ 25,706       $ (1,263     (4.9 )% 

Food and beverage

     45,345         40,947         (4,398     (10.7 )%      41,550         37,334         (4,216     (11.3 )% 

Other departmental expenses

     51,358         49,701         (1,657     (3.3 )%      45,765         44,592         (1,173     (2.6 )% 

Management fees

     5,879         5,222         (657     (12.6 )%      5,258         4,781         (477     (10.0 )% 

Other hotel expenses

     12,672         12,621         (51     (0.4 )%      10,944         11,466         522        4.6
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

     

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

Total hotel operating expenses

   $ 144,537       $ 135,855       $ (8,682     (6.4 )%    $ 130,486       $ 123,879       $ (6,607     (5.3 )% 
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

     

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

For the Total Portfolio, hotel operating expenses increased by $8.7 million, or 6.4%, for the three months ended September 30, 2011 when compared to the three months ended September 30, 2010, which includes approximately $14.0 million of expenses related to the Four Seasons Silicon Valley and Four Seasons Jackson Hole hotels, which we acquired in March 2011. This increase in Total Portfolio hotel operating expenses was partially offset by a decrease of $12.0 million of expenses related to the Fairmont Scottsdale Princess hotel, which became an unconsolidated affiliate in the second quarter of 2011. Our Same Store Assets contributed to a $6.6 million, or 5.3%, increase in hotel operating expenses. For the Same Store Assets, hotel operating expenses were primarily impacted by $4.3 million higher payroll costs resulting from higher occupancy and general wage increases at the hotels, $1.2 million higher food and beverage costs due to increased food and beverage consumption and the change in terms of a restaurant agreement at the Westin St. Francis, $0.5 million higher credit card and travel agent commissions, which increased due to higher occupancy and rates, $0.5 million higher management fees, $0.5 million higher insurance costs due to higher premiums, and $0.3 million of pre-opening costs related to the Michael Jordan Steakhouse at the InterContinental Chicago hotel, partially offset by a decrease in real estate taxes of $1.2 million primarily due to lower taxes at the Fairmont Chicago and InterContinental Chicago hotels.

Depreciation and Amortization. For the Total Portfolio, depreciation and amortization decreased $6.7 million, or 20.7%, for the three months ended September 30, 2011 when compared to the three months ended September 30, 2010. There was a decrease in depreciation expense of $5.9 million related to the Fairmont Scottsdale Princess hotel due to an impairment of certain assets in the fourth quarter of 2010, which decreased depreciation expense subsequent to the impairment and due to the hotel becoming an unconsolidated affiliate during the second quarter of 2011. This decrease was partially offset by a $1.1 million increase in depreciation expense due to the Four Seasons Silicon Valley and Four Seasons Jackson Hole hotels, which we acquired in March 2011. In addition, the depreciation and amortization for the Same Store Assets decreased by $1.9 million primarily due to assets becoming fully depreciated early in the third quarter of 2011.

 

45


Table of Contents

Corporate Expenses. Corporate expenses decreased $10.9 million, or 125.7%, for the three months ended September 30, 2011 when compared to the same period in 2010. These expenses consist primarily of payroll and related costs, professional fees, travel expenses and office rent. The decrease in corporate expenses is primarily due to a $6.9 million credit related to the Value Creation Plan recorded during the three months ended September 20, 2011 compared to $3.8 million of expense recorded during the same period in the prior year. See “Item 1. Financial Statements – 10. Share-Based Employee Compensation Plans – Value Creation Plan” for further description of this plan. The amounts recorded in corporate expenses related to the Value Creation Plan are based on the fair value of the Value Creation Plan awards, which are based directly on our market capitalization and fluctuate as a result of changes in our stock price and issuances of shares of our common stock.

Interest Expense, Net. The $0.3 million, or 1.2%, decrease in interest expense, net for the three months ended September 30, 2011 when compared to the three months ended September 30, 2010, was primarily due to:

 

   

a $3.8 million decrease in expense related to the mark to market of certain interest rate swaps,

 

   

a $3.1 million decrease attributable to lower average borrowings,

 

   

a $0.7 million decrease in the amortization of deferred financing costs, and

 

   

a $0.1 million increase in capitalized interest, partially offset by

 

   

a $7.4 million increase due to the net impact of higher average interest rates offset by a decrease in amortization of interest rate swap costs.

The components of interest expense, net for the three months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010 are summarized as follows (in thousands):

 

     Three Months  Ended
September 30,
 
     2011     2010  

Mortgages and other debt

   $ (16,515   $ (9,304

Bank credit facility

     (567     (898

Amortization of deferred financing costs

     (894     (1,581

Amortization of interest rate swap costs

     (2,995     (5,512

Mark to market of certain interest rate swaps

     (1,146     (4,983

Interest income

     41        64   

Capitalized interest

     279        160   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total interest expense, net

   $ (21,797   $ (22,054
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

The weighted average debt outstanding for the three months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010 amounted to $1.00 billion and $1.16 billion, respectively. At September 30, 2011, including the effect of interest rate swaps, approximately 97.8% of our total debt had fixed interest rates.

Loss on Early Extinguishment of Debt. During the three months ended September 30, 2011, we recognized a loss on early extinguishment of debt of $0.4 million primarily due to write offs of unamortized deferred financing costs and other closing costs related to the refinancing of certain mortgages.

 

46


Table of Contents

Equity in (Losses) Earnings of Unconsolidated Affiliates. The following tables present equity in (losses) earnings and certain components included in the calculation of equity in (losses) earnings resulting from our unconsolidated affiliates.

Three months ended September 30, 2011 (in thousands):

 

     Fairmont
Scottsdale Princess
Venture (1)
    Hotel del Coronado
Venture (2)
     Four Seasons
RCPM
    Total  

Equity in (losses) earnings

   $ (3,326   $ 1,533       $ (74   $ (1,867

Depreciation and amortization

     1,806        1,941         23        3,770   

Interest expense

     198        3,078         25        3,301   

Income tax expense (benefit)

     —          125         (32     93   

Three months ended September 30, 2010 (in thousands):

 

     Hotel /North
Beach Venture (3)
     Four Seasons
RCPM
     BuyEfficient (4)      Total  

Equity in earnings

   $ 2,773       $ 25       $ 203       $ 3,001   

Depreciation and amortization

     2,015         32         —           2,047   

Interest expense

     1,988         16         —           2,004   

Income tax expense

     272         8         —           280   

 

(1) On June 9, 2011, the Fairmont Scottsdale Princess Venture, which consists of FMT Scottsdale Holdings, L.L.C. and Walton/SHR FPH Holdings, L.L.C., was formed. See “—Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements—Fairmont Scottsdale Princess Venture” for further detail regarding the ownership of the Fairmont Scottsdale Princess hotel.

 

(2) The Hotel del Coronado Venture is BSK Del Partners, L.P., the owner of the Hotel del Coronado as of February 4, 2011. See “- Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements—Hotel and North Beach Ventures” for further detail regarding the ownership of the Hotel del Coronado.

 

(3) These ventures include SHC KSL Partners, LP (Hotel Venture), the owner of the Hotel del Coronado through February 3, 2011, and HdC North Beach Development, LLLP (North Beach Venture), the owner of a residential condominium-hotel development adjacent to the hotel. See “- Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements – Hotel and North Beach Ventures” for further detail regarding the ownership of the Hotel del Coronado.

 

(4) On January 21, 2011, we sold our 50.0% interest in BuyEfficient for $9.0 million.

We recorded $1.9 million of equity in losses during the three months ended September 30, 2011, which is a $4.9 million increase in losses from the $3.0 million equity in earnings recorded during the three months ended September 30, 2010. The increase in losses is primarily due to operating losses incurred at the Fairmont Scottsdale Princess, which became an unconsolidated affiliate during the second quarter of 2011, a higher interest rate on the new Hotel del Coronado loan secured as part of the recapitalization in the first quarter of 2011, and the sale of BuyEfficient.

Other Income, Net. Other income, net includes asset management fee income, non-income related state, local and franchise taxes, as well as miscellaneous income and expenses. The decrease in other income of $1.3 million for the three months ended September 30, 2011 when compared to the same period in the prior year is primarily due to a refund of local taxes related to the Fairmont Scottsdale Princess hotel in 2010.

 

47


Table of Contents

Income (Loss) from Discontinued Operations, Net of Tax. We sold our leasehold interest in the Paris Marriott hotel during the second quarter of 2011. We sold the InterContinental Prague hotel during the fourth quarter of 2010. The results of operations of these hotels were reclassified as discontinued operations for the periods presented.

The loss from discontinued operations, net of tax, of $4.1 million for the three months ended September 30, 2010 consisted of the operating results of the Paris Marriott and InterContinental Prague hotels.

Net Loss Attributable to the Noncontrolling Interests in SHR’s Operating Partnership. We record net loss or income attributable to noncontrolling interests in SHR’s operating partnership based on the percentage of SH Funding we do not own. Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interests in SHR’s operating partnership decreased $0.2 million for the three months ended September 30, 2011 when compared to the same period in the prior year. This change was primarily due to a decrease in net loss recognized during the three months ended September 30, 2011 when compared to the three months ended September 30, 2010. Additionally, our ownership percentage of SH Funding increased when compared to the prior period due to the issuance of shares of common stock in connection with i) the acquisition of interests in the InterContinental Chicago and Hyatt Regency La Jolla hotels in June 2011, ii) the acquisition of the Four Seasons Silicon Valley and Four Seasons Jackson Hole hotels in March 2011, and iii) a private placement in March 2011.

Net Income Attributable to the Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Affiliates. We record net loss or income attributable to noncontrolling interests in consolidated affiliates for the non-ownership interests in hotels that we partially own. Net income attributable to the noncontrolling interests in consolidated affiliates decreased $0.8 million for the three months ended September 30, 2011 when compared to the same period in the prior year primarily due to our acquisition of the remaining interest in the InterContinental Chicago in June 2011, which gave us 100.0% ownership of the hotel.

 

48


Table of Contents

Comparison of Nine Months Ended September 30, 2011 to Nine Months Ended September 30, 2010

Operating Results

The following table presents the operating results for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, including the amount and percentage change in these results between the two periods of our Total Portfolio and Same Store Assets (in thousands, except operating data).

 

     Total Portfolio     Same Store Assets  
     2011     2010     Change ($)
Favorable/
(Unfavorable)
    Change (%)
Favorable/
(Unfavorable)
    2011     2010     Change ($)
Favorable/
(Unfavorable)
    Change (%)
Favorable/
(Unfavorable)
 

Revenues:

                

Rooms

   $ 310,330      $ 268,674      $ 41,656        15.5   $ 273,576      $ 245,987      $ 27,589        11.2

Food and beverage

     195,987        172,423        23,564        13.7     168,652        150,998        17,654        11.7

Other hotel operating revenue

     59,860        57,285        2,575        4.5     47,986        49,930        (1,944     (3.9 )% 

Lease revenue

     3,747        3,383        364        10.8     3,747        3,383        364        10.8
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

     

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

Total revenues

     569,924        501,765        68,159        13.6     493,961        450,298        43,663        9.7
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

           

Operating Costs and Expenses:

                

Hotel operating expenses

     441,294        404,711        (36,583     (9.0 )%      381,327        357,808        (23,519     (6.6 )% 

Lease expense

     3,702        3,396        (306     (9.0 )%      3,702        3,396        (306     (9.0 )% 

Depreciation and amortization

     86,222        98,195        11,973        12.2     76,287        79,613        3,326        4.2

Corporate expenses

     24,206        22,098        (2,108     (9.5 )%      —          —          —          —     
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

     

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

Total operating costs and expenses

     555,424        528,400        (27,024     (5.1 )%      461,316        440,817        (20,499     (4.7 )% 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

     

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

Operating income (loss)

     14,500        (26,635     41,135        154.4   $ 32,645      $ 9,481      $ 23,164        244.3
          

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

Interest expense, net

     (67,024     (68,119     1,095        1.6        

Loss on early extinguishment of debt

     (1,237     (925     (312     (33.7 )%         

Loss on early termination of derivative financial instruments

     (29,242     (18,263     (10,979     (60.1 )%         

Equity in (losses) earnings of unconsolidated affiliates

     (6,266     2,900        (9,166     (316.1 )%         

Foreign currency exchange gain (loss)

     77        (1,394     1,471        105.5        

Other income, net

     4,716        2,299        2,417        105.1        
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

           

Loss before income taxes and discontinued operations

     (84,476 )       (110,137     25,661        23.3        

Income tax expense

     (279     (296     17        5.7        
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

           

Loss from continuing operations

     (84,755     (110,433     25,678        23.3        

Income from discontinued operations, net of tax

     101,215        6,474        94,741        1,463.4        
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

           

Net income (loss)

     16,460        (103,959     120,419        115.8        

Net (income) loss attributable to the noncontrolling interests in SHR’s operating partnership

     (70     879        (949     (108.0 )%         

Net income attributable to the noncontrolling interests in consolidated affiliates

     (997     (858     (139     (16.2 )%         
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

           

Net income (loss) attributable to SHR

   $ 15,393      $ (103,938   $ 119,331        114.8        
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

         

Reconciliation of Same Store Assets Operating Income to Total Portfolio Operating Income (Loss):

  

   

Same Store Assets operating income

         $ 32,645      $ 9,481      $ 23,164        244.3

Corporate expenses

           (24,206     (22,098     (2,108     (9.5 )% 

Corporate depreciation and amortization

           (1,083     (1,129     46        4.1

Non-Same Store Assets operating income (loss)

           7,144        (12,889     20,033        155.4
          

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

Total Portfolio operating income (loss)

         $ 14,500      $ (26,635   $ 41,135        154.4
          

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

Operating Data (1):

              

Number of hotels

     15        14            13        13       

Number of rooms

     6,356        6,681            6,032        6,032       

 

(1) Operating data includes the leasehold interest in Marriott Hamburg and excludes unconsolidated affiliates and properties included in discontinued operations.

 

49


Table of Contents

Rooms. For the Total Portfolio, rooms revenue increased $41.7 million, or 15.5%, for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 from the nine months ended September 30, 2010. RevPAR from our Total Portfolio for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 increased by 16.0% from the nine months ended September 30, 2010. The components of RevPAR from our Total Portfolio for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010 are summarized as follows:

 

     Nine Months Ended
September 30,
 
     2011     2010     Change (%)
Favorable/
(Unfavorable)
 

Occupancy

     72.88     68.88     5.8

ADR

   $ 245.85      $ 224.20        9.7

RevPAR

   $ 179.18      $ 154.42        16.0

Our Same Store Assets contributed to a $27.6 million, or 11.2%, increase in rooms revenue. RevPAR from our Same Store Assets for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 increased by 11.2% from the nine months ended September 30, 2010. The components of RevPAR from our Same Store Assets for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010 are summarized as follows:

 

     Nine Months Ended
September 30,
 
     2011     2010     Change (%)
Favorable/
(Unfavorable)
 

Occupancy

     72.80     69.24     5.1

ADR

   $ 240.48      $ 227.33        5.8

RevPAR

   $ 175.07      $ 157.41        11.2

The increase in RevPAR for the Same Store Assets resulted from the combination of a 5.8% increase in ADR and a 3.56 percentage-point increase in occupancy. Rooms revenue increased across all but one of our Same Store Assets for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 when compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2010 due to improving market conditions. The Four Seasons Punta Mita Resort was the only consolidated hotel that experienced a significant decrease in rooms revenue due to declining demand resulting from safety concerns in Mexico. The increase in Total Portfolio rooms revenue also includes $16.6 million of additional rooms revenue generated by the Four Seasons Silicon Valley and the Four Seasons Jackson Hole hotels, which we acquired in March 2011. The increase in rooms revenue was partially offset by a decrease of $2.5 million in rooms revenue related to the Fairmont Scottsdale Princess hotel, which became an unconsolidated affiliate in the second quarter of 2011.

Food and Beverage. Food and beverage revenue increased $23.6 million, or 13.7%, for the Total Portfolio when comparing the nine months ended September 30, 2011 to the nine months ended September 30, 2010. Our Same Store Assets contributed to a $17.7 million, or 11.7%, increase in food and beverage revenue. The primary factor increasing food and beverage revenue at the Same Store Assets was an increase in group occupancy, which generated higher banquet revenue when compared to prior year, and increased revenue at the hotels’ food and beverage outlets, which included increased revenues at the Westin St. Francis hotel resulting from a change in the terms of a restaurant agreement, and the opening of the Michael Jordan Steakhouse at the InterContinental Chicago hotel. The increase in Total Portfolio food and

 

50


Table of Contents

beverage revenue also includes $10.3 million of additional revenue generated by the Four Seasons Silicon Valley and Four Seasons Jackson Hole hotels, which we acquired in March 2011. These increases in Total Portfolio food and beverage revenue were partially offset by a $4.4 million decrease in food and beverage revenue related to the Fairmont Scottsdale Princess hotel, which became an unconsolidated affiliate in the second quarter of 2011.

Other Hotel Operating Revenue. Other hotel operating revenue increased $2.6 million, or 4.5%, for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 from the nine months ended September 30, 2010. The increase in Total Portfolio other hotel operating revenue includes $6.5 million of additional revenue generated by the Four Seasons Silicon Valley and the Four Seasons Jackson Hole hotels that we acquired in March 2011, which was partially offset by a $2.0 million decrease in other hotel operating revenue related to the Fairmont Scottsdale Princess hotel, which became an unconsolidated affiliate in the second quarter of 2011. In addition, there was a decrease of $1.9 million, or 3.9%, in other hotel operating revenue related to the Same Store Assets, which was primarily due lower cancellation and attrition revenues and lower occupancy at the Four Seasons Punta Mita Resort.

Hotel Operating Expenses. The following table presents the components of our hotel operating expenses for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, including the amount and percentage changes in these expenses between the two periods (in thousands):

 

     Total Portfolio     Same Store Assets  
                   Change($)     Change (%)                   Change($)     Change (%)  
                   Favorable/     Favorable/                   Favorable/     Favorable/  
     2011      2010      (Unfavorable)     (Unfavorable)     2011      2010      (Unfavorable)     (Unfavorable)  

Hotel operating expenses:

                    

Rooms

   $ 85,728       $ 77,938       $ (7,790     (10.0 )%    $ 76,364       $ 71,108       $ (5,256     (7.4 )% 

Food and beverage

     142,010         124,038         (17,972     (14.5 )%      124,476         110,385         (14,091     (12.8 )% 

Other departmental expenses

     155,856         145,869         (9,987     (6.8 )%      132,463         127,071         (5,392     (4.2 )% 

Management fees

     18,203         16,818         (1,385     (8.2 )%      14,975         14,246         (729     (5.1 )% 

Other hotel expenses

     39,497         40,048         551        1.4     33,049         34,998         1,949        5.6
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

     

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

Total hotel operating expenses

   $ 441,294       $ 404,711       $ (36,583     (9.0 )%    $ 381,327       $ 357,808       $ (23,519     (6.6 )% 
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

     

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

For the Total Portfolio, hotel operating expenses increased by $36.6 million, or 9.0%, for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 when compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2010, primarily due to our Same Store Assets which contributed to an increase of $23.5 million, or 6.6%. For the Same Store Assets, hotel operating expenses were impacted by $14.0 million higher payroll costs resulting from higher occupancy and wage increases at the hotels, $4.3 million higher food and beverage costs due to increased food and beverage consumption and the change in terms of a restaurant agreement at the Westin St. Francis, $1.9 million higher credit card and travel agent commissions, which increased due to higher occupancy, rates and food and beverage volume, $0.7 million higher utility costs, $0.7 higher management fees, and $0.5 million of pre-opening costs related to the Michael Jordan Steakhouse at the InterContinental Chicago hotel, partially offset by a decrease in real estate taxes of $2.8 million primarily due to lower taxes at the Fairmont Chicago and InterContinental Chicago hotels and a tax refund at the Westin St. Francis. Additionally, the Total Portfolio hotel operating expenses includes approximately $27.9 million of expenses related to the Four Seasons Silicon Valley and Four Seasons Jackson Hole hotels, which we acquired in March 2011. The increase in Total Portfolio hotel operating expenses was partially offset by a $14.7 million decrease related to the Fairmont Scottsdale Princess hotel, which became an unconsolidated affiliate in the second quarter of 2011.

Depreciation and Amortization. For the Total Portfolio, depreciation and amortization decreased $12.0 million, or 12.2%, for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 when compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2010. This was primarily driven by a decrease in depreciation expense of $11.1 million related to the Fairmont Scottsdale Princess hotel due to an impairment of certain assets in the fourth quarter of 2010, which decreased depreciation expense subsequent to the impairment, and the hotel becoming an unconsolidated affiliated in the second quarter of 2011. In addition, the depreciation and amortization for the Same Store Assets decreased by $3.3 million primarily due to assets becoming fully depreciated.

 

51


Table of Contents

Corporate Expenses. Corporate expenses increased $2.1 million, or 9.5%, for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 when compared to the same period in 2010. These expenses consist primarily of payroll and related costs, professional fees, travel expenses and office rent. The increase in corporate expenses is primarily due to a $2.2 million increase in the charge related to the Value Creation Plan. See “Item 1. Financial Statements – 10. Share-Based Employee Compensation Plans – Value Creation Plan” for further description of this plan. The amounts recorded in corporate expenses related to the Value Creation Plan are based on the fair value of the Value Creation Plan awards, which are based directly on our market capitalization and fluctuate as a result of changes in our stock price and issuances of shares of our common stock.

Interest Expense, Net. The $1.1 million, or 1.6%, decrease in interest expense, net for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 when compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2010 was primarily due to:

 

   

a $16.2 million decrease attributable to lower average borrowings,

 

   

a $10.0 million decrease in expense related to the mark to market of certain interest rate swaps,

 

   

a $2.2 million decrease in the amortization of deferred financing costs, and

 

   

a $0.3 million increase in capitalized interest, partially offset by

 

   

a $27.4 million increase due to the net impact of higher average interest rates offset by a decrease in amortization of interest rate swap costs, and

 

   

a $0.2 million decrease in interest income.

The components of interest expense, net for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010 are summarized as follows (in thousands):

 

     Nine Months Ended
September 30,
 
     2011     2010  

Mortgages and other debt

   $ (50,256   $ (25,263

Bank credit facility

     (1,957     (4,653

Exchangeable Notes

     —          (2,783

Amortization of Exchangeable Notes discount

     —          (1,865

Amortization of deferred financing costs

     (2,816     (5,045

Amortization of interest rate swap costs

     (13,431     (19,819

Mark to market of certain interest rate swaps

     487        (9,549

Interest income

     124        369   

Capitalized interest

     825        489   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total interest expense, net

   $ (67,024   $ (68,119
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

The weighted average debt outstanding for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010 amounted to $1.08 billion and $1.35 billion, respectively. At September 30, 2011, including the effect of interest rate swaps, approximately 97.8% of our total debt had fixed interest rates.

 

52


Table of Contents

Loss on Early Extinguishment of Debt. During the nine months ended September 30, 2011, we recognized a loss on early extinguishment of debt of $1.2 million primarily due to write offs of unamortized deferred financing costs and other closing costs related to refinancing of certain mortgages and a new bank credit facility. During the nine months ended September 30, 2010, we tendered all outstanding Exchangeable Notes and recognized a loss on early extinguishment of debt of $0.9 million.

Loss on Early Termination of Derivative Financial Instruments. During the nine months ended September 30, 2011, we recorded a charge in loss on early termination of derivative financial instruments of $27.3 million, which included the immediate write-off of $25.5 million previously recorded in accumulated OCL related to interest rate swaps that were designated to hedge cash flows that are no longer probable of occurring and $1.8 million of mark to market adjustments related to the terminated interest rate swaps. In addition, based on changes in the forecasted levels of LIBOR-based debt, we de-designated one interest rate swap as a cash flow hedge. We recorded an additional charge in loss on early termination of derivative financial instruments of $2.0 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 to write off amounts previously recorded in accumulated OCL related to this swap.

During the nine months ended September 30, 2010, we terminated five interest rate swaps and recognized a charge of $18.3 million, which included amounts previously recorded in accumulated OCL related to these swaps.

Equity in (Losses) Earnings of Unconsolidated Affiliates. The following tables present equity in (losses) earnings and certain components included in the calculation of equity in (losses) earnings resulting from our unconsolidated affiliates.

Nine months ended September 30, 2011 (in thousands):

 

     Fairmont
Scottsdale
Princess
Venture
    Hotel del
Coronado
Venture
    Hotel/North
Beach
Ventures
    Four
Seasons
RCPM
    Total  

Equity in losses

   $ (4,743   $ (1,005   $ (511   $ (7   $ (6,266

Depreciation and amortization

     2,257        5,152        544        69        8,022   

Interest expense

     248        7,733        778        76        8,835   

Income tax expense (benefit)

     —          115        (669     (10     (564

Nine months ended September 30, 2010 (in thousands):

 

     Hotel /North
Beach Venture
    Four Seasons
RCPM
     BuyEfficient      Total  

Equity in earnings

   $ 2,156      $ 253       $ 491       $ 2,900   

Depreciation and amortization

     6,003        96         —           6,099   

Interest expense

     5,740        76         —           5,816   

Income tax (benefit) expense

     (111     85         —           (26

We recorded $6.3 million of equity in losses during the nine months ended September 30, 2011, which is a $9.2 million increase in losses from the $2.9 million equity in earnings recorded during the nine months ended September 30, 2010. The increase in losses is primarily due to legal costs incurred as part of the Hotel del Coronado recapitalization, a higher interest rate on the new loan secured as part of the Hotel del Coronado recapitalization, mark to market of interest rate caps purchased as part of the Hotel del Coronado recapitalization, operating losses at the Fairmont Scottsdale Princess, which became an unconsolidated affiliate during the second quarter of 2011, and the sale of BuyEfficient.

Foreign Currency Exchange Gain (Loss). We recorded a foreign currency exchange gain of $77,000 during the nine months ended September 30, 2011, which is a $1.5 million increase from the $1.4 million foreign currency exchange loss recorded in the same period in the prior year. The change was primarily related to changing foreign exchange rates related to a GBP-denominated loan associated with the Marriott London Grosvenor Square.

 

53


Table of Contents

Other Income, Net. Other income, net includes asset management fee income, non-income related state, local and franchise taxes, as well as miscellaneous income and expenses. The increase in other income, net of $2.4 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 when compared to the same period in the prior year is primarily due to a $2.6 million gain we recognized on the sale of our interest in BuyEfficient and an increase in asset management fee income, which includes financing and other fees we received related to the Hotel del Coronado, which was partially offset by a refund of local taxes related to the Fairmont Scottsdale Princess hotel received in 2010.

Income from Discontinued Operations, Net of Tax. We sold our leasehold interest in the Paris Marriott hotel during the second quarter of 2011. We sold the InterContinental Prague hotel during the fourth quarter of 2010. The results of operations of these hotels were reclassified as discontinued operations for the periods presented.

The income from discontinued operations, net of tax of $101.2 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 consisted primarily of a $100.9 million gain recognized on the sale of the Paris Marriott hotel resulting from the recognition of a deferred gain. The income from discontinued operations, net of tax, of $6.5 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 primarily consisted of the operating results of the Paris Marriott and the InterContinental Prague hotels and the recognition of a $1.8 million deferred gain related to the sale of the Hyatt Regency New Orleans hotel.

Net (Income) Loss Attributable to the Noncontrolling Interests in SHR’s Operating Partnership. We record net loss or income attributable to noncontrolling interests in SHR’s operating partnership based on the percentage of SH Funding we do not own. Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests in SHR’s operating partnership for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 was $70,000, an increase of $0.9 million, from net loss attributable to noncontrolling interests in SHR’s operating partnership of $0.9 million in the same period in the prior year. This change was primarily due to an increase to net income recognized during the nine months ended September 30, 2011 when compared to the net loss recognized during the nine months ended September 30, 2010. Additionally, our ownership percentage of SH Funding increased when compared to the prior period due to the issuance of shares of common stock in connection with i) the acquisition of interests in the InterContinental Chicago and Hyatt Regency La Jolla hotels in June 2011, ii) the acquisition of the Four Seasons Silicon Valley and Four Seasons Jackson Hole hotels in March 2011, and iii) a private placement and common stock offering in March 2011 and May 2010, respectively.

Net Income Attributable to the Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Affiliates. We record net loss or income attributable to noncontrolling interests in consolidated affiliates for the non-ownership interests in hotels that are partially owned by us. Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests in consolidated affiliates increased by $0.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 when compared to the same period in the prior year due to an increase in net income of our consolidated affiliates in 2011 when compared to 2010. Additionally, we acquired the remaining interest in the InterContinental Chicago in June 2011, which gave us 100.0% ownership of the hotel.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Our short-term liquidity requirements consist primarily of funds necessary to pay for operating expenses and other expenditures. Historically, we have satisfied our short-term liquidity requirements through our existing working capital, cash provided by operations, and our bank credit facility. On June 30, 2011, we entered into a new $300.0 million bank credit facility agreement, which includes a $100.0 million accordion feature. The new facility provides sufficient borrowing capacity to meet our short-term liquidity requirements during 2011 and thereafter. As of September 30, 2011, we were in compliance with our financial and other restrictive covenants contained in the bank credit facility.

 

54


Table of Contents

Our available capacity under the bank credit facility and compliance with financial covenants in future periods will depend substantially on the financial results of our hotels, and in particular, the operating results and appraised values of the borrowing base assets, which include the Four Seasons Punta Mita Resort, the Ritz-Carlton Half Moon Bay, the Marriott Lincolnshire, and the Ritz-Carlton Laguna Niguel hotels. As of November 2, 2011, the outstanding borrowings and letters of credit in the aggregate were $2.1 million.

In the second quarter of 2010, we completed a common stock offering and raised net proceeds of approximately $331.8 million. These proceeds were used to fund our tender offer for Exchangeable Notes and repay existing indebtedness under the previous bank credit facility. In the fourth quarter of 2010, we sold the InterContinental Prague for net sales proceeds of $3.6 million, in which the buyer assumed the mortgage debt and related interest rate swap liability. On March 11, 2011 we acquired the Four Seasons Silicon Valley and the Four Seasons Jackson Hole hotels in exchange for an aggregate of 15.2 million shares of our common stock at a price of $6.08 per share based on our March 11, 2011 common share closing price and concurrently privately placed and issued an additional 8.0 million shares of our stock to an affiliate of the seller of the two hotels at a price of $6.25 per share. The net proceeds from the concurrent private placement were used to repay existing indebtedness under the previous bank credit facility. On April 6, 2011, we sold our leasehold interest in the Paris Marriott hotel for consideration of €29.2 million ($41.6 million) and received an additional €10.1 million ($14.5 million) related to a security deposit that was released back to us and other closing adjustments. We received an additional €1.5 million ($2.0 million) on October 11, 2011. In July 2011, we refinanced certain of our mortgage loans whereby we staggered and extended maturities through 2021 (see – “Mortgages and other debt payable” below). We believe that the measures we have taken, as described above, should be sufficient to satisfy our liquidity needs for the next 12 months.

In February 2009, our board of directors elected to suspend the quarterly dividend to holders of Series A, B and C Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock as a measure to preserve liquidity. Factors contributing to this decision were the declining economic environment for hotel operations, no projected taxable distribution requirement for 2009 under the REIT rules, and uncertainty regarding operating cash flows in 2009. In November 2008, our board of directors elected to suspend the quarterly dividend to holders of shares of our common stock beginning in the fourth quarter of 2008. As of September 30, 2011, unpaid cumulative preferred dividends totaled $84.9 million and these dividends continue to accrue at approximately $7.7 million per quarter.

In our continued evaluation of the reinstatement of the payment of the preferred dividends, we have focused on addressing the majority of our 2011 and 2012 debt maturities and ensuring that our current and forecasted future operating results are sufficient to sustain payment of the quarterly preferred dividends on an ongoing basis. We have successfully completed a series of transactions including the sale of assets, equity offerings, and debt refinancings and restructurings. The result of these transactions have reduced our total outstanding debt, extended the maturities of existing debt well into the future, and strategically staggered all of our future debt maturities.

While operations at our hotels have substantially improved and we currently anticipate that trend to continue, we are currently in the process of reviewing our internal forecast of operations as part of our budgeting process for 2012. The board of directors will continue to evaluate the dividend policy in light of the REIT provisions of the Tax Code, restrictions under the bank credit facility, and the overall economic climate.

Capital expenditures for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010 amounted to $38.4 million and $26.5 million, respectively. Included in the 2011 and 2010 amounts were $0.8 million and $0.5 million of capitalized interest, respectively. For the remainder of the year ending December 31, 2011, we expect to spend approximately $6.0 million on hotel property and equipment replacement projects in accordance with hotel management or lease agreements and up to approximately $1.8 million on owner-funded projects.

 

55


Table of Contents

Bank credit facility. On June 30, 2011, we entered into a $300.0 million bank credit facility agreement. The agreement contains an accordion feature allowing for additional borrowing capacity up to $400.0 million, subject to the satisfaction of customary conditions set forth in the agreement. The following summarizes key financial terms and conditions of the bank credit facility:

 

   

interest on the facility is payable monthly at LIBOR plus an applicable margin in the case of each LIBOR loan and base-rate plus an applicable margin in the case of each base rate loan whereby the applicable margins are dependent on the ratio of consolidated debt to gross asset value (Leverage Ratio) as follows:

 

Leverage Ratio

   Applicable Margin of
each LIBOR Loan
(% per annum)
    Applicable Margin of
each Base Rate Loan
(% per annum)
 

Greater than or equal to 60%

     3.75     2.75

Greater than or equal to 55% but less than 60%

     3.50     2.50

Greater than or equal to 50% but less than 55%

     3.25     2.25

Greater than or equal to 45% but less than 50%

     3.00     2.00

Less than 45%

     2.75     1.75

 

   

an unused commitment fee is payable monthly based on the unused revolver balance at a rate of 0.45% per annum in the event that the bank credit facility usage is less than 50% and a rate of 0.25% per annum in the event that the bank credit facility usage is equal to or greater than 50%;

 

   

maturity date of June 30, 2014, with the right to extend the maturity date for an additional one-year period with an extension fee equal to 25 basis points, subject to certain conditions;

 

   

lenders received collateral in the form of mortgages over four borrowing base properties, which initially include the Ritz-Carlton Laguna Niguel, the Ritz-Carlton Half Moon Bay, the Four Seasons Punta Mita Resort, and the Marriott Lincolnshire, in addition to pledges of the Company’s interest in SH Funding and SH Funding’s interest in certain subsidiaries and guarantees of the loan from the Company and certain of its subsidiaries;

 

   

maximum availability is determined by the lesser of 60% advance rate against the appraised value of the borrowing base properties (provided at any time the total fixed charge coverage ratio is less than 1.25 times, the percentage shall be reduced to 55%) or a 1.20 times debt service coverage on the borrowing base properties (based on the trailing 12 months net operating income for these assets divided by the greater of the in-place interest rate or 7.0% debt constant on the balance outstanding under the bank credit facility) provided not more than 40% of aggregate appraised value and 40% of trailing 12 month net operating income is attributable to borrowing base properties located outside the United States;

 

56


Table of Contents
   

minimum corporate fixed charge coverage of 1.00 times from the closing date through the fourth quarter of 2012, 1.10 times through 2013, 1.20 times from the first quarter of 2014 through the initial maturity date, and 1.30 times during the extension year, which will permanently increase to 1.35 times if cash dividends are reinstated on SHR’s common stock;

 

   

maximum corporate leverage of 65% during the initial term and 60% during any extension period;

 

   

minimum tangible net worth of $700.0 million, excluding goodwill and currency translation adjustments, plus an amount equal to 75% of the net proceeds of any new issuances of SHR’s common stock, which is not used to reduce indebtedness or used in a transaction or series of transactions to redeem outstanding capital stock;

 

   

restrictions on SHR and SH Funding’s ability to pay dividends. Such restrictions include:

 

   

prohibitions on SHR and SH Funding and their respective subsidiaries’ ability to pay any dividends unless certain ratios and other conditions are met; and

 

   

prohibitions on SHR and SH Funding’s ability to issue dividends in cash or in kind at any time an event of default shall have occurred.

Notwithstanding the dividend restrictions described above, for so long as the Company qualifies, or has taken all other actions necessary to qualify as a REIT, SH Funding may authorize, declare, and pay quarterly cash dividends to the Company when and to the extent necessary for the Company to distribute cash dividends to its shareholders generally in an aggregate amount not to exceed the minimum amount necessary for the Company to maintain its tax status as a REIT, unless certain events of default exist. In addition, provided no event of default exists, the Company is permitted to pay the outstanding cumulative accrued but unpaid preferred dividends at any time on or prior to June 30, 2012. Subsequent to June 30, 2012, provided no event of default exists, the Company is permitted to pay the outstanding cumulative accrued but unpaid preferred dividends subject to certain conditions set forth in the credit facility agreement.

Other terms and conditions exist including provisions to release assets from the borrowing base and limitations on our ability to incur costs for discretionary capital programs and redeem, retire or repurchase common stock. Under the agreement, SH Funding has a letter of credit sub-facility of $75.0 million, which is secured by the $300.0 million bank credit facility. Letters of credit reduce the borrowing capacity under the bank credit facility.

 

57


Table of Contents

Mortgages and other debt payable. The following table summarizes our outstanding debt and scheduled maturities, related to mortgages and other debt payable as of September 30, 2011, including extension options (in thousands):

 

     Balance as of
September 30,
2011
     Remainder
of
2011
     2012      2013      2014      2015      Thereafter  

Mortgages payable

                    

Hyatt Regency La Jolla, LIBOR plus 1.00%

   $ 97,500       $ —         $ 97,500       $ —         $ —         $ —         $ —     

Marriott London Grosvenor Square, 3-month GBP LIBOR plus 1.10% (1)

     113,980         —           3,210         110,770         —           —           —     

Four Seasons Washington, D.C., LIBOR plus 3.15% (1)(2)

     130,000         —           —           —           —           —           130,000   

Fairmont Chicago, 6.09% (1)

     97,750         —           2,583         2,745         2,917         3,099         86,406   

Westin St. Francis, 6.09% (1)

     220,000         —           5,814         6,178         6,564         6,976         194,468   

Loews Santa Monica Beach Hotel, LIBOR plus 3.85% (1)(2)

     110,000         —           —           1,000         2,000         2,000         105,000   

InterContinental Miami, LIBOR plus 3.50% (1)(2)

     85,000         —           —           —           422         889         83,689   

InterContinental Chicago, 5.61% (1)(2)

     145,000         —           —           943         1,969         2,082         140,006   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total mortgages payable

     999,230         —           109,107         121,636         13,872         15,046         739,569   

Other debt, 5.00% (3)

     1,476         —           —           1,476         —           —           —     
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total mortgages and other debt payable

   $ 1,000,706       $ —         $ 109,107       $ 123,112       $ 13,872       $ 15,046       $ 739,569   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

(1) These loan agreements require maintenance of financial covenants, all of which we were in compliance with at September 30, 2011.

 

(2) In July 2011, we refinanced or executed mortgage loans related to these hotels. See “Item 1. Financial Statements – 7. Indebtedness – Mortgages and Other Debt Payable for further details related to these mortgage loans.

 

(3) The North Beach Venture (see “—Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements – Hotel and North Beach Ventures”) assumed the mortgage loan on a hotel-condominium unit, which is secured by the hotel-condominium unit.

Our long-term liquidity requirements consist primarily of funds necessary to pay for scheduled debt maturities, renovations, expansions and other non-recurring capital expenditures that need to be made periodically to our properties and the costs associated with acquisitions of properties. In addition, we may use cash to buy back outstanding debt or common or preferred securities from time to time when market conditions are favorable through open market purchases, privately negotiated transactions, or a tender offer, although the terms of our bank credit facility may impose certain conditions or restrictions in connection therewith.

Historically, we have satisfied our long-term liquidity requirements through various sources of capital, including our existing working capital, cash provided by operations, sales of properties, long-term property mortgage indebtedness, bank credit facilities, issuance of senior unsecured debt instruments and through the issuance of additional equity securities. Credit markets have improved and access to mortgage and corporate level debt is more readily available. However, the capital markets continue to be fragile and there are no guarantees our maturing debt will be readily refinanced. Our ability to raise funds through the issuance of equity securities is dependent upon, among other things, general market conditions for both REITs in general and us specifically, including market perceptions regarding the Company.

On May 19, 2010, we completed a public offering of 75.9 million shares of common stock at a price of $4.60 per share and raised net proceeds of approximately $331.8 million. In addition, on March 11, 2011, we issued 8.0 million shares of common stock in a private placement at a price of $6.25 per share and raised net proceeds of approximately $49.7 million and concurrently issued 15.2 million shares of common stock at a price of $6.08 based on our March 11, 2011 common share closing price to acquire the Four Seasons Silicon Valley and Four Seasons Jackson Hole hotels for $92.4 million. On June 9, 2011, we completed a recapitalization of the Fairmont Scottsdale Princess hotel, whereby we contributed the assets and liabilities of the hotel and cash of $34.9 million in exchange for a 50% ownership interest in the Fairmont Scottsdale Princess Venture. On June 24, 2011, we acquired the remaining 49% interest in the

 

58


Table of Contents

InterContinental Chicago hotel and an additional 2.5% ownership interest in the Hyatt Regency La Jolla hotel for total consideration of approximately $90.2 million, which included the issuance of an aggregate of approximately 10.8 million shares of common stock at a price of $6.51 per share based on our June 24, 2011 common share closing price, approximately $19.4 million of cash which includes our pro-rata share of working capital and post-closing adjustments of $0.5 million. We will continue to analyze which source of capital is most advantageous to us at any particular point in time, but equity and debt financing may not be consistently available to us on terms that are attractive or at all.

Equity Securities

As of September 30, 2011, we had 1,668,981 RSUs outstanding, of which 524,115 were vested. In addition, we had 669,797 options to purchase shares of SHR common stock (Options) outstanding.

The following table presents the changes in our issued and outstanding shares of common stock and SH Funding operating partnership units (OP Units) since December 31, 2010 (excluding RSUs):

 

     Common Shares      OP Units Represented
by Noncontrolling
Interests
    Total  

Outstanding at December 31, 2010

     151,305,314         954,571        152,259,885   

RSUs redeemed for shares of our common stock

     221,929         —          221,929   

OP Units redeemed for shares of our common stock

     101,110         (101,110     —     

Common stock issued

     33,998,846         —          33,998,846   
  

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

 

Outstanding at September 30, 2011

     185,627,199         853,461        186,480,660   
  

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

 

Cash Flows

Operating Activities. Net cash provided by operating activities was $46.4 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 compared to $57.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010. Cash flows from operations decreased from 2010 to 2011 primarily due to higher cash interest payments in 2011 when compared to 2010 and working capital changes, partially offset by an increase in hotel operating income in 2011 when compared to 2010.

Investing Activities. Net cash used in investing activities was $57.6 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 compared to $42.0 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010. The significant investing activities during these periods are summarized below:

 

   

We sold our 50.0% interest in BuyEfficient for $9.0 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2011.

 

   

We sold our leasehold interest in the Paris Marriott during the nine months ended September 30, 2011 for $55.2 million.

 

   

We paid $93.2 million related to the recapitalization of the Hotel and North Beach Ventures and the Fairmont Scottsdale Princess Venture during the nine months ended September 30, 2011.

 

59


Table of Contents
   

We acquired unrestricted cash of $30.6 million through the recapitalization of the Hotel and North Beach Ventures and acquisition of the Four Seasons Silicon Valley and Four Seasons Jackson Hole hotels during the nine months ended September 30, 2011.

 

   

We disbursed $38.4 million and $26.5 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively, for capital expenditures primarily related to room renovations and food and beverage facilities.

 

   

Restricted cash and cash equivalents increased by $13.7 million and $18.6 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively.

Financing Activities. Net cash provided by financing activities was $16.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 compared to net cash used in financing activities of $58.7 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010. The significant financing activities during these periods are summarized below:

 

   

We received proceeds from a private placement and common stock offering, net of offering costs, of approximately $49.2 million and $331.8 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively.

 

   

We made net payments of $28.0 million and $142.0 million on our bank credit facility during the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively.

 

   

During the nine months ended September 30, 2011, we received net proceeds of $61.0 million on mortgages and other debt. During the nine months ended September 30, 2010, we made payments of $32.5 million on mortgages and other debt.

 

   

We paid $33.3 million and $35.2 million to terminate and buy down interest rate swaps during the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively.

 

   

We purchased the remaining 49% interest in the InterContinental Chicago hotel and an additional 2.5% interest in the Hyatt Regency La Jolla hotel for common stock and cash of $19.5 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2011.

 

   

During the nine months ended September 30, 2011, we paid financing costs of $12.5 million.

 

   

During the nine months ended September 30, 2010, we tendered the outstanding Exchangeable Notes for $180.0 million.

Dividend Policy

We generally intend to distribute each year substantially all of our taxable income (which does not necessarily equal net income as calculated in accordance with GAAP) to our shareholders so as to comply with REIT provisions of the Tax Code. If necessary for REIT qualification purposes, we may need to distribute any taxable income in cash or by a special dividend. Our dividend policy is subject to revision at the discretion of our board of directors. All distributions will be made at the discretion of our board of directors and will depend on our taxable income, our financial condition, our maintenance of REIT status and other factors as our board of directors deems relevant.

For the nine months ended September 30, 2011, our board of directors has continued the suspension of the quarterly dividend to holders of shares of our common and preferred stock as a measure to preserve liquidity due to the uncertainty in the economic environment and no projected taxable distribution requirement. Based on our current forecasts, we would not be required to make any distributions during 2011 in order to maintain our REIT status. The board of directors will continue to evaluate the dividend policy in light of the REIT provisions of the Tax Code, restrictions under the bank credit facility, and the overall economic climate.

 

60


Table of Contents

Contractual Obligations

The following table summarizes our future payment obligations and commitments as of September 30, 2011 (in thousands):

 

     Payments Due by Period  
     Total      Less than
1 year (1)
     1 to 3 years      4 to 5 years      More than 5
years
 

Long-term debt obligations (2)

   $ 1,000,706       $ —         $ 246,091       $ 160,906       $ 593,709   

Interest on long-term debt obligations (3)

     341,793         17,054         188,890         82,891         52,958   

Operating lease obligations—ground leases and office space

     9,461         170         2,096         1,474         5,721   

Operating leases –Marriott Hamburg

     91,721         1,223         14,675         9,784         66,039   

Construction contracts

     4,437         2,137         2,300         —           —     
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total

   $ 1,448,118       $ 20,584       $ 454,052       $ 255,055       $ 718,427   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

(1) These amounts represent obligations that are due within fiscal year 2011.

 

(2) Long-term debt obligations include our mortgages and other debt and bank credit facility. Maturity dates assume all extension options are exercised, including conditional options.

 

(3) Interest on variable-rate debt obligations is calculated based on the variable rates at September 30, 2011 and includes the effect of our interest rate swaps.

Reserve Funds for Capital Expenditures

We maintain each of our hotels in excellent condition and in conformity with applicable laws and regulations and in accordance with the agreed upon requirements in our management agreements with our preferred operators.

We are obligated to maintain reserve funds for capital expenditures at the majority of our hotels (including the periodic replacement or refurbishment of furniture, fixtures and equipment) as determined pursuant to the management agreements with our preferred operators. As of September 30, 2011, $18.1 million was in restricted cash reserves for future capital expenditures. Generally, our agreements with hotel operators require us to reserve funds at amounts ranging between 4.0% and 5.0% of the individual hotel’s annual revenues and require the funds to be set aside in restricted cash. Expenditures are capitalized as incurred and depreciation begins when the related asset is placed in service. Any unexpended amounts will remain our property upon termination of the management and operating contracts.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

Fairmont Scottsdale Princess Venture

On June 9, 2011, we completed a recapitalization of the Fairmont Scottsdale Princess hotel. We entered into agreements with an unaffiliated third party, an affiliate of Walton Street Capital, L.L.C. (Walton Street), to form FMT Scottsdale Holdings, L.L.C. and Walton/SHR FPH Holdings, L.L.C. (together, the Fairmont Scottsdale Princess Venture) to own the Fairmont Scottsdale Princess hotel. We contributed the assets and liabilities of the hotel and cash of approximately $34.9 million in exchange for a 50% ownership interest in the Fairmont Scottsdale Princess Venture and now account for our investment under the equity method of accounting. We jointly control the venture with Walton Street and serve as the managing member. We also continue to serve as the hotel’s asset manager and earn a quarterly base management fee equal to 1.0% of total revenues during years one and two following the formation of the Fairmont Scottsdale Princess Venture, 1.25% of total revenues during years three and four, and 1.5% of total revenues thereafter, as well as certain project management fees. In connection with the Fairmont Scottsdale Princess Venture, we are entitled to certain promote payments after Walton Street achieves a specified return.

 

61


Table of Contents

As part of the recapitalization, the Fairmont Scottsdale Princess Venture retired the hotel’s $40.0 million mezzanine debt. In addition, the hotel’s $140.0 million first mortgage was amended and extended. The amendment included a $7.0 million principal payment and the debt was extended through December 2013 with an option for a second extension through April 9, 2015, subject to certain conditions. Interest remains payable monthly at LIBOR plus 0.36%. Our investment in the Fairmont Scottsdale Princess Venture amounted to $27.7 million as of September 30, 2011. Our equity in losses of the Fairmont Scottsdale Princess Venture was $(4.7) million for the nine months ended September 30, 2011.

Hotel and North Beach Ventures

Prior to February 4, 2011, we had a 45.0% ownership interest in the Hotel Venture, the then owner of the Hotel del Coronado in San Diego, California, and the North Beach Venture, the owner of an adjacent residential condominium-hotel development. We accounted for our investments in the Hotel and North Beach Ventures under the equity method of accounting. Our investment in the Hotel and North Beach Ventures amounted to $7.8 million as of December 31, 2010. We recognized equity in (losses) earnings related to the Hotel and North Beach Ventures of $(0.5) million for the period from January 1, 2011 through February 3, 2011 and $2.2 million for nine months ended September 30, 2010. We earned asset management, development and financing fees under agreements with the Hotel and North Beach Ventures. We recognized income of 55.0% of these fees, representing the percentage of the Hotel and North Beach Ventures not owned by us.

The Hotel Venture obtained $610.0 million of non-recourse mortgage and mezzanine debt financings and a $20.0 million non-recourse revolving credit facility, which were secured by, among other things, a mortgage on the Hotel del Coronado. In December 2010, the Hotel Venture purchased a $37.5 million mezzanine layer of the debt structure for a discounted payoff of $13.0 million. The remaining principal on the mortgage and mezzanine debt financings and revolving credit facility had a maturity date of January 7, 2011. On January 7, 2011, the Hotel Venture obtained an extension of the maturity date to February 9, 2011.

On February 4, 2011, the Hotel and North Beach Ventures completed a recapitalization (the Transaction) through a series of contemporaneous transactions. Under the terms of the Transaction, we acquired the ownership interest of an existing member of the Hotel and North Beach Ventures, and, along with the remaining members of the Hotel Venture, formed a partnership, BSK Del Partners, L.P. (Hotel del Coronado Venture) with an unaffiliated third party, an affiliate of Blackstone Real Estate Advisors VI L.P. (Blackstone), to own the Hotel del Coronado. As part of the Transaction, we contributed $57.4 million of cash drawn from our bank credit facility to fund our contribution. This payment included the purchase of the existing member’s ownership in the Hotel and North Beach Ventures and is net of a $1.7 million financing fee earned as part of the Transaction. The Hotel Venture contributed substantially all of the assets and liabilities to the Hotel del Coronado Venture. The Hotel del Coronado Venture then settled all contributed debts outstanding by paying balances off in full or agreeing to convert debt to equity. In connection with the Transaction, we also acquired our partner’s interest in HdC DC Corporation, a taxable corporation, with assets of $25.6 million and an existing deferred tax liability of approximately $48.6 million. As a result of the Transaction, we recorded an equity method investment of $97.6 million. Pursuant to the terms of the Transaction, Blackstone is the general partner of the Hotel del Coronado Venture with a 60.0% ownership interest and we are a limited partner with an indirect 34.3% ownership interest. Our investment in the Hotel del Coronado Venture amounted to $96.8 million as of September 30, 2011. Our equity in losses of the Hotel del Coronado Venture was $(1.0) million for the nine months ended September 30, 2011.

The Hotel del Coronado Venture secured $425.0 million of five-year debt financing at a weighted average rate of LIBOR plus 480 basis points, subject to a 1.0% LIBOR floor. After the third year of the loan, the final two one-year extensions require payment to the lender of a 25 basis point extension fee. Additionally, the Hotel del Coronado Venture purchased a two-year 2.0% LIBOR cap, which was required by the loan.

 

62


Table of Contents

We continue to act as asset manager and earn a quarterly asset management fee equal to 1.0% of gross revenue, certain development fees, and when applicable, an incentive fee equal to one-third of the incentive fee paid to the hotel operator under the hotel management agreement. As part of the Hotel del Coronado Venture with Blackstone, the remaining members of the Hotel Venture earn a profit-based incentive fee of 20.0% of all distributions of the Hotel del Coronado Venture that exceed both a 20.0% internal rate of return and two times return on invested equity.

Four Seasons RCPM

We own a 31.0% interest in and act as asset manager for a venture with two unaffiliated parties that is developing the Four Seasons RCPM, a luxury vacation home product sold in fractional ownership interests on the property adjacent to our Four Seasons Punta Mita Resort hotel in Mexico. We account for this investment under the equity method of accounting. At September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, our investment in the unconsolidated affiliate amounted to $3.9 million and $4.0 million, respectively. Our equity in (losses) earnings of the unconsolidated affiliate was $(7,000) and $0.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively.

BuyEfficient

We owned a 50.0% interest in an electronic purchasing platform venture called BuyEfficient with an unaffiliated third party. This platform allows members to procure food, operating supplies, furniture, fixtures and equipment. We accounted for this investment under the equity method of accounting. At December 31, 2010, our investment in the unconsolidated affiliate amounted to $6.3 million. Our equity in earnings of the unconsolidated affiliate was $0.5 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010. On January 21, 2011, we sold our 50.0% interest in this venture for $9.0 million.

Related Party Transactions

We have in the past engaged in and currently engage in transactions with related parties. See “Item 1. Financial Statements – 11. Related Party Transactions” for a discussion of our transactions with related parties.

Critical Accounting Policies

Our discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations is based upon our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with GAAP. The preparation of these financial statements requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities.

We evaluate our estimates on an ongoing basis. We base our estimates on historical experience, information that is currently available to us and on various other assumptions that we believe are reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions. We believe the following critical accounting policies affect the most significant judgments and estimates used in the preparation of our consolidated financial statements.

 

   

Impairment

Long-Lived Assets. We review our long-lived assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. The recoverability of assets to be held and used is measured by a comparison of the carrying amount of an asset to future undiscounted net cash flows expected to be generated by the asset. If such assets are considered to be impaired, the impairment recognized is measured by the amount by

 

63


Table of Contents

which the carrying amount of the assets exceeds the estimated fair value of the assets. In our analysis of fair value, we use discounted cash flow analysis to estimate the fair value of our properties taking into account each property’s expected cash flow from operations, holding period and proceeds from disposing of the property. In addition to the discounted cash flow analysis, management also considers external independent appraisals to estimate fair value. The analysis and appraisals used by management are consistent with those used by a market participant. The factors addressed in determining estimated proceeds from disposition include anticipated operating cash flow in the year of disposition, terminal capitalization rate and selling price per room. Judgment is required in determining the discount rate applied to estimated cash flows, growth rate of the properties, the need for capital expenditures, as well as specific market and economic conditions. Additionally, the classification of assets as held for sale requires the recording of assets at their net realizable value which can affect the amount of impairment recorded.

There were no indicators of potential impairment during the nine months ended September 30, 2011, and we did not record any non-cash long-lived asset impairment charges. However, if deterioration in economic and market conditions occurs, it may present a potential for impairment charges on our hotel properties subsequent to September 30, 2011. Any such adjustments could be material, but will be non-cash.

Goodwill. We review goodwill for impairment at least annually as of December 31 and whenever circumstances or events indicate potential impairment. Goodwill has an indefinite useful life that should not be amortized but should be reviewed annually for impairment, or more frequently if events or changes in circumstances indicate that goodwill might be impaired. The measurement of impairment of goodwill consists of two steps. In the first step, we compare the fair value of each reporting unit, which in our case is each hotel property, to its carrying value. In the second step of the impairment test, the impairment loss is determined by comparing the implied fair value of goodwill to the recorded amount of goodwill. The activities in the second step include hypothetically allocating the fair value of the reporting unit used in step one to all of the assets and liabilities, including all intangible assets, even if no intangible assets are currently recorded, of that reporting unit as if the reporting unit had been acquired in a business combination and the fair value of the reporting unit was the price paid to acquire the reporting unit.

There were no indicators of potential impairment during the nine months ended September 30, 2011, and we did not record any non-cash goodwill impairment charges. However, if deterioration in economic and market conditions occurs, it may present a potential for impairment charges on our hotel properties with goodwill subsequent to September 30, 2011. Any such adjustments could be material, but will be non-cash.

Investment in Unconsolidated Affiliates. A series of operating losses of an investee or other factors may indicate that a decrease in value of a company’s investment in unconsolidated affiliates has occurred which is other-than-temporary. Accordingly, the investment in each of the unconsolidated affiliates is evaluated periodically and as deemed necessary for recoverability and valuation declines that are other-than-temporary. If the investment is other than temporarily impaired, the investment is written down to its estimated fair value. Also taken into consideration when testing for impairment is the value of the underlying real estate investments, the ownership and distribution preferences and limitations and rights to sell and repurchase of its ownership interests. There were no other-than-temporary declines in value of investments in unconsolidated affiliates during the nine months ended September 30, 2011. However, if deterioration in economic and market conditions occurs, it may present a potential for other-than-temporary declines in value subsequent to September 30, 2011. Any such adjustments could be material, but will be non-cash.

 

64


Table of Contents
   

Acquisition Related Assets and Liabilities. Accounting for the acquisition of a hotel property as a purchase transaction requires an allocation of the purchase price to the assets acquired and the liabilities assumed in the transaction at their respective estimated fair values. The most difficult estimations of individual fair values are those involving long-lived assets, such as property and equipment and intangible assets. We use all available information to make these fair value determinations and, for hotel acquisitions, engage an independent valuation specialist to assist in the fair value determination of the acquired long-lived assets. Due to inherent subjectivity in determining the estimated fair value of long-lived assets, we believe that the recording of acquired assets and liabilities is a critical accounting policy. We acquired the Four Seasons Silicon Valley and Four Seasons Jackson Hole hotels during the nine months ended September 30, 2011.

 

   

Depreciation and Amortization Expense. Depreciation expense is based on the estimated useful life of our assets. The life of the assets is based on a number of assumptions, including cost and timing of capital expenditures to maintain and refurbish the asset, as well as specific market and economic conditions. While management believes its estimates are reasonable, a change in the estimated lives could affect depreciation expense and net income or the gain or loss on the sale of any of the assets.

 

   

Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities. Derivative instruments and hedging activities require management to make judgments on the nature of its derivatives and their effectiveness as hedges. These judgments determine if the changes in fair value of the derivative instruments are reported in our consolidated statements of operations as a component of net income or as a component of comprehensive income and as a component of equity on our consolidated balance sheets. While management believes its judgments are reasonable, a change in a derivative’s effectiveness as a hedge could affect expenses, net income and equity.

If the notional amount of the derivative instruments exceeds the forecasted LIBOR-based debt, an over-hedged position results. To alleviate the over-hedged position, the derivative instruments may be terminated and/or de-designated as hedges. Future changes to our overall floating rate debt could have implications to our overall hedging position. In February 2011, we paid $4.2 million to terminate three interest rate swaps with a combined notional amount of $125.0 million. There were no immediate charges to earnings in February 2011 based on our forecasted levels of LIBOR-based debt at the time of the transaction. In June 2011, we paid $29.7 million to terminate five interest rate swaps with a combined notional amount of $300.0 million. We also de-designated one interest rate swap with a notional amount of $100.0 million as a cash flow hedge. We recorded a charge of $29.2 million, which included the immediate write-off of $27.4 million previously recorded in accumulated OCL related to interest rate swaps that were designated to hedge cash flows that are no longer probable of occurring and $1.8 million of mark to market adjustments related to the terminated interest rate swaps. The charge was recorded in loss on early termination of derivative financial instruments in the consolidated statements of operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2011. Changes in the market value of the de-designated interest rate swap will be recorded in earnings subsequent to the de-designation. Depending on the capital markets and the availability of floating rate debt, the remaining swap portfolio may need to be reassessed in the future for additional terminations.

 

   

Disposal of Long-Lived Assets. We classify assets as held for sale in accordance with GAAP. Assets identified as held for sale are reclassified on our balance sheet and the related results of operations are reclassified as discontinued operations on our statement of operations. While these classifications do not have an effect on total assets, net equity or net income, they affect the classifications within each statement. Additionally, a determination to classify an asset as held for sale affects depreciation expense as long-lived assets are not depreciated while classified as held for sale. We classified the Paris Marriott’s assets and liabilities as held for sale as of December 31, 2010.

 

65


Table of Contents

Seasonality

The lodging business is seasonal in nature, and we experience some seasonality in our business. Revenues for hotels in tourist areas, those with significant group business, and in areas driven by greater climate changes are generally seasonal. Quarterly revenues also may be adversely affected by events beyond our control, such as extreme weather conditions and other acts of nature, terror attacks or alerts, airline strikes, economic factors and other considerations affecting travel.

The Marriott domestic hotels report their results of operations using a fiscal year consisting of thirteen four-week periods. As a result, for our domestic Marriott branded property, for all years presented, the first three quarters consist of 12 weeks each and the fourth quarter consists of 16 weeks.

To the extent that cash flows from operations are insufficient during any quarter, due to temporary or seasonal fluctuations in revenues, we may have to enter into short-term borrowings to pay operating expenses and make distributions to our stockholders.

New Accounting Guidance

In September 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) amended its guidance on the testing of goodwill impairment to allow an entity the option to first assess qualitative factors to determine whether the current two-step process is necessary. Under the amended guidance, the calculation of the reporting unit’s fair value (step one of the goodwill impairment test) is not required unless, as a result of the qualitative assessment, it is more likely than not that the fair value of the reporting unit is less than the unit’s carrying amount. If it is not more likely than not that the fair value of the reporting unit is less than the carrying amount, further testing of goodwill for impairment would not be performed. The amendment is effective for fiscal years and interim periods within such years beginning after December 15, 2011, which for us will be our 2012 first quarter, with early adoption permitted. The adoption of this guidance is not expected to have a material impact on our financial statements.

In June 2011, the FASB issued new guidance that amends current comprehensive income guidance. The new guidance eliminates the option to present the components of other comprehensive income as part of the statement of shareholders’ equity. Instead, we must report comprehensive income in either a single continuous statement of comprehensive income which contains two sections, net income and other comprehensive income, or in two separate but consecutive statements. Additionally, the guidance requires an entity to present on the face of the financial statements reclassification adjustments for items that are reclassified from other comprehensive income to net income in the statement(s) where the components of net income and the components of other comprehensive income are presented. The new guidance will be effective January 1, 2012. The adoption of the new guidance will not have a material impact on our financial statements.

In December 2010, the FASB issued new guidance that amends the criteria for performing the second step of the goodwill impairment test for reporting units with zero or negative carrying amounts and requires performing the second step if qualitative factors indicate that it is more likely than not that a goodwill impairment exists. We adopted the new guidance on January 1, 2011, and determined that it did not have a material impact on our financial statements.

Non-GAAP Financial Measures

We present five non-GAAP financial measures that we believe are useful to management and investors as key measures of our operating performance: FFO; FFO—Fully Diluted; Comparable FFO; EBITDA; and Comparable EBITDA. Amounts presented in accordance with our definitions of FFO, FFO—Fully Diluted, Comparable FFO, EBITDA, and Comparable EBITDA may not be comparable to similar measures

 

66


Table of Contents

disclosed by other companies, since not all companies calculate these non-GAAP measures in the same manner. FFO, FFO—Fully Diluted, Comparable FFO, EBITDA, and Comparable EBITDA should not be considered as an alternative measure of our net income (loss) or operating performance. FFO, FFO—Fully Diluted, Comparable FFO, EBITDA, and Comparable EBITDA may include funds that may not be available for our discretionary use due to functional requirements to conserve funds for capital expenditures and property acquisitions and other commitments and uncertainties. Although we believe that FFO, FFO—Fully Diluted, Comparable FFO, EBITDA, and Comparable EBITDA can enhance the understanding of our financial condition and results of operations, these non-GAAP financial measures, when viewed individually, are not necessarily better indicators of any trend as compared to comparable GAAP measures such as net income (loss) attributable to SHR common shareholders. In addition, adverse economic and market conditions might negatively impact our cash flow. We have provided a quantitative reconciliation of FFO, FFO—Fully Diluted, Comparable FFO, EBITDA, and Comparable EBITDA to the most directly comparable GAAP financial performance measure, which is net income (loss) attributable to SHR common shareholders.

EBITDA and Comparable EBITDA

EBITDA represents net income (loss) attributable to SHR common shareholders excluding: (i) interest expense, (ii) income taxes, including deferred income tax benefits and expenses applicable to our foreign subsidiaries and income taxes applicable to sale of assets; (iii) depreciation and amortization; and (iv) preferred stock dividends. EBITDA also excludes interest expense, income taxes and depreciation and amortization of our unconsolidated affiliates. EBITDA is presented on a full participation basis, which means we have assumed conversion of all redeemable noncontrolling interests of our operating partnership into our common stock. We believe this treatment of noncontrolling interests provides more useful information for management and our investors and appropriately considers our current capital structure. We also present Comparable EBITDA, which eliminates the effect of realizing deferred gains on our sale leasebacks, as well as the effect of gains or losses on sales of assets, early extinguishment of debt, impairment losses, foreign currency exchange gains or losses and certain other charges that are highly variable from year to year.

We believe EBITDA and Comparable EBITDA are useful to management and investors in evaluating our operating performance because they provide management and investors with an indication of our ability to incur and service debt, to satisfy general operating expenses, to make capital expenditures and to fund other cash needs or reinvest cash into our business. We also believe they help management and investors meaningfully evaluate and compare the results of our operations from period to period by removing the impact of our asset base (primarily depreciation and amortization) from our operating results. Our management also uses EBITDA and Comparable EBITDA as measures in determining the value of acquisitions and dispositions.

 

67


Table of Contents

The following table provides a reconciliation of net loss attributable to SHR common shareholders to Comparable EBITDA (in thousands):

 

     Three Months Ended     Nine Months Ended  
     September 30,     September 30,  
     2011     2010     2011     2010  

Net loss attributable to SHR common shareholders

   $ (11,902   $ (39,401   $ (7,771   $ (127,102

Depreciation and amortization – continuing operations

     25,526        32,209        86,222        98,195   

Depreciation and amortization – discontinued operations

     —          1,859        —          5,413   

Interest expense – continuing operations

     21,838        22,118        67,148        68,488   

Interest expense – discontinued operations

     —          2,378        —          7,716   

Income taxes – continuing operations

     867        68        279        296   

Income taxes – discontinued operations

     —          329        379        736   

Noncontrolling interests

     (16     (192     70        (879

Adjustments from consolidated affiliates

     (1,248     (1,978     (5,431     (5,596

Adjustments from unconsolidated affiliates

     7,162        4,332        16,293        11,890   

Preferred shareholder dividends

     7,721        7,721        23,164        23,164   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

EBITDA

     49,948        29,443        180,353        82,321   

Realized portion of deferred gain on sale leaseback – continuing operations

     (42     (51     (151     (154

Realized portion of deferred gain on sale leaseback – discontinued operations

     —          (1,088     (1,214     (3,321

Gain on sale of assets – continuing operations

     —          —          (2,640     —     

Loss (gain) on sale of assets – discontinued operations

     35        —          (100,930     (1,237

Loss on early extinguishment of debt

     399        39        1,237        925   

Loss on early termination of derivative financial instruments

     —          —          29,242        18,263   

Foreign currency exchange loss (gain) – continuing operations

     209        132        (77     1,394   

Foreign currency exchange loss (gain) – discontinued operations

     —          5,096        (51     (7,490

Adjustment for Value Creation Plan

     (6,921     3,844        9,078        6,871   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Comparable EBITDA

   $ 43,628      $ 37,415      $ 114,847      $ 97,572   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

FFO, FFO-Fully Diluted, and Comparable FFO

We compute FFO in accordance with standards established by the National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts, or NAREIT, which adopted a definition of FFO in order to promote an industry-wide standard measure of REIT operating performance. NAREIT defines FFO as net income (or loss) (computed in accordance with GAAP) excluding losses or gains from sales of depreciable property plus real estate-related depreciation and amortization, and after adjustments for our portion of these items related to unconsolidated affiliates. We also present FFO—Fully Diluted, which is FFO plus income or loss on income attributable to redeemable noncontrolling interests of our operating partnership. We also present Comparable FFO, which is FFO—Fully Diluted excluding the impact of any gains or losses on early extinguishment of debt, impairment losses, foreign currency exchange gains or losses and certain other charges that are highly variable from year to year.

We believe that the presentation of FFO, FFO—Fully Diluted and Comparable FFO provides useful information to management and investors regarding our results of operations because they are measures of our ability to fund capital expenditures and expand our business. In addition, FFO is widely used in the real estate industry to measure operating performance without regard to items such as depreciation and amortization.

 

68


Table of Contents

The following table provides a reconciliation of net loss attributable to SHR common shareholders to Comparable FFO (in thousands):

 

     Three Months Ended     Nine Months Ended  
     September 30,     September 30,  
     2011     2010     2011     2010  

Net loss attributable to SHR common shareholders

   $ (11,902   $ (39,401   $ (7,771   $ (127,102

Depreciation and amortization – continuing operations

     25,526        32,209        86,222        98,195   

Depreciation and amortization – discontinued operations

     —          1,859        —          5,413   

Corporate depreciation

     (279     (304     (868     (914

Gain on sale of assets – continuing operations

     —          —          (2,640     —     

Loss (gain) on sale of assets – discontinued operations

     35        —          (100,930     (1,237

Realized portion of deferred gain on sale leaseback – continuing operations

     (42     (51     (151     (154

Realized portion of deferred gain on sale leaseback – discontinued operations

     —          (1,088     (1,214     (3,321

Deferred tax expense on realized portion of deferred gain on sale leasebacks

     —          340        379        1,036   

Noncontrolling interests adjustments

     (134     (230     (440     (937

Adjustments from consolidated affiliates

     (663     (1,342     (3,822     (4,644

Adjustments from unconsolidated affiliates

     3,770        2,047        8,023        6,099   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

FFO

     16,311        (5,961     (23,212     (27,566

Redeemable noncontrolling interests

     118        38        510        58   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

FFO – Fully Diluted

     16,429        (5,923     (22,702     (27,508

Non-cash mark to market of interest rate swaps

     1,146        5,597        (487     9,778   

Loss on early extinguishment of debt

     399        39        1,237        925   

Loss on early termination of derivative financial instruments

     —          —          29,242        18,263   

Foreign currency exchange loss (gain) – continuing operations

     209        132        (77     1,394   

Foreign currency exchange loss (gain), net of tax – discontinued operations

     —          5,085        (51     (7,515

Adjustment for Value Creation Plan

     (6,921     3,844        9,078        6,871   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Comparable FFO

   $ 11,262      $ 8,774      $ 16,240      $ 2,208   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

  ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK.

Interest Rate Risk

Our future income, cash flows and fair values relevant to financial instruments are dependent upon prevailing market interest rates. Market risk refers to the risk of loss from adverse changes in market prices and interest rates. The majority of our outstanding debt, after considering the effect of interest rate swaps, has a fixed interest rate. We use derivative financial instruments to manage, or hedge, interest rate risks related to our borrowings, from lines of credit to medium- and long-term financings. We generally require that hedging derivative instruments be effective in reducing the interest rate risk exposure that they are designed to hedge. We do not use derivatives for trading or speculative purposes and only enter into contracts with major financial institutions based on their credit rating and other factors. We use methods which incorporate standard market conventions and techniques such as discounted cash flow analysis and option pricing models to determine fair value. All methods of estimating fair value result in general approximation of value and such value may or may not actually be realized.

See “Item 1. Financial Statements 9. Derivatives” for information on our interest rate cap and swap agreements outstanding as of September 30, 2011.

As of September 30, 2011, our total outstanding mortgages and other debt and indebtedness under the bank credit facility totaled approximately $1.0 billion, of which approximately 97.8% was fixed-rate debt when including the effect of interest rate swaps.

Currency Exchange Risk

As we have international operations, currency exchange risk arises as a normal part of our business. In particular, we are subject to fluctuations due to changes in foreign exchange rates in the British pound, euro and Mexican peso. We reduce this risk by transacting our international business in local currencies. In this manner, assets and liabilities are matched in the local currency, which reduces the need for dollar conversion. Generally, we do not enter into forward or option contracts to manage our currency exchange risk exposure applicable to net operating cash flows.

 

69


Table of Contents

To manage the currency exchange risk applicable to equity positions in foreign hotels, we may use long-term mortgage debt denominated in the local currency. In addition, we may enter into forward or option contracts. We do not currently have any currency forward or option contracts.

Our exposure to foreign currency exchange rates relates primarily to our foreign hotels. For our foreign hotels, exchange rates impact the U.S. dollar value of our reported earnings, our investments in the hotels and the intercompany transactions with the hotels.

For the nine months ended September 30, 2011, approximately 9.4% of our total revenues, were generated outside of the United States, with approximately 4.1% of total revenues generated from the Four Seasons Punta Mita Resort (which uses the Mexican peso), approximately 4.6% of total revenues generated from the Marriott London Grosvenor Square (which uses the British pound), and approximately 0.7% of total revenues generated from the Marriott Hamburg (which uses the euro). As a result, fluctuations in the value of foreign currencies against the U.S. dollar may have a significant impact on our reported results. Revenues and expenses denominated in foreign currencies are translated into U.S. dollars at a weighted average exchange rate for the period. Consequently, as the value of the U.S. dollar changes relative to the currencies of these markets, our reported results vary.

If the U.S. dollar had strengthened an additional 10.0% during the nine months ended September 30, 2011, total revenues and operating income or loss would have changed from the amounts reported by (in millions):

 

     Mexican
Peso
    British
Pound
    Euro     Total  

Decrease in total revenues

   $ (2.4   $ (2.6   $ (0.4   $ (5.4

Decrease in operating income

   $  —        $ (0.3   $  —        $ (0.3

Fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates also impact the U.S. dollar amount of our shareholders’ equity. The assets and liabilities of our non-U.S. hotels are translated into U.S. dollars at exchange rates in effect at the end of the period. The resulting translation adjustments are recorded in shareholders’ equity as a component of accumulated other comprehensive loss. If the U.S. dollar had strengthened by 10.0% as of September 30, 2011, resulting translation adjustments recorded in shareholders’ equity would have increased by approximately $2.4 million from the amounts reported.

 

70


Table of Contents
ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES.

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

An evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our “disclosure controls and procedures” (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act), as of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report on Form 10-Q was made under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our chief executive officer and our chief financial officer. Based upon this evaluation, as of September 30, 2011, our chief executive officer and our chief financial officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in reports filed or submitted under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms and that information required to be disclosed by us in reports filed or submitted under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

There have been no changes in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) during the quarter ended September 30, 2011 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal controls over financial reporting.

PART II.     OTHER INFORMATION

 

ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS.

We are not involved in any material litigation nor, to our knowledge, is any material litigation threatened against us, other than routine litigation arising in the ordinary course of business or which is expected to be covered by insurance.

 

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS.

There were no material changes from the risk factors previously disclosed in our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010.

A copy of those risk factors, updated for this quarterly report on Form 10-Q, are attached as Exhibit 99.1 to this quarterly report on Form 10-Q.

 

ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS.

None.

 

ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES.

In February 2009, our board of directors elected to suspend the quarterly dividend beginning with the first quarter of 2009 to holders of shares of our 8.50% Series A Cumulative Preferred Stock, 8.25% Series B Cumulative Preferred Stock, and 8.25% Series C Cumulative Preferred Stock. Dividends on the preferred stock are cumulative. As of the date of the filing of this report, unpaid cumulative dividends on our preferred stock were $84,935,000.

 

ITEM 4. (REMOVED AND RESERVED).

 

ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION.

None.

 

71


Table of Contents
ITEM 6. EXHIBITS.

The information in the Exhibit Index appearing after the signature page of this Form 10-Q is incorporated by reference.

 

72


Table of Contents

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

 

  STRATEGIC HOTELS & RESORTS, INC.
November 3, 2011   By:  

/s/ Laurence S. Geller             

  Laurence S. Geller
 

President, Chief Executive Officer and Director

(principal executive officer)

November 3, 2011   By:  

/s/ Diane M. Morefield             

  Diane M. Morefield
 

Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

(principal financial officer)

 

73


Table of Contents

Exhibit Index

 

Exhibit No.

 

Description of Exhibit

3.1.a   Articles of Amendment and Restatement of the Company (filed as Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Amendment No. 3 to the Registration Statement on Form S-11 (File No. 333-112846), filed with the SEC on June 8, 2004 and incorporated herein by reference).
3.1.b   Articles of Amendment relating to the Company’s name change to Strategic Hotels & Resorts, Inc. (filed as Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 001-32223), filed with the SEC on March 15, 2006 and incorporated herein by reference).
3.1.c   Articles of Amendment (filed as Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 001-32223), filed with the SEC on May 19, 2010 and incorporated herein by reference).
3.1.d   Articles Supplementary relating to the Company’s 8.50% Series A Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock (filed as Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 001-32223), filed with the SEC on March 18, 2005 and incorporated herein by reference).
3.1.e   Certificate of Correction relating to the Company’s 8.50% Series A Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock (filed as Exhibit 3.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 001-32223), filed with the SEC on March 18, 2005 and incorporated herein by reference).
3.1.f   Articles Supplementary relating to the Company’s 8.25% Series B Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock (filed as Exhibit 3.5 to the Company’s Form 8-A (File No. 001-32223), filed with the SEC on January 13, 2006 and incorporated herein by reference).
3.1.g   Articles Supplementary relating to the Company’s 8.25% Series C Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock (filed as Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 001-32223), filed with the SEC on April 21, 2006 and incorporated herein by reference).
3.1.h   Articles Supplementary relating to the Company’s Series D Junior Participating Preferred Stock (filed as Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 001-32223), filed with the SEC on November 18, 2008 and incorporated herein by reference).
3.1.i   Articles Supplementary relating to the Company’s Series D Junior Participating Preferred Stock (filed as Exhibit 3.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 001-32223), filed with the SEC on May 19, 2010 and incorporated herein by reference).
3.2   By-Laws of the Company (filed as Exhibit 3.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 001-32223), filed with the SEC on November 18, 2008 and incorporated herein by reference).
10.1   Loan Agreement, dated as of July 28, 2011, by and among SHC Michigan Avenue, LLC, New DTRS Michigan Avenue, LLC and JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 001-32223), filed with the SEC on July 29, 2011 and incorporated herein by reference).
10.2   Promissory Note, dated as of July 28, 2011 (filed as Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 001-32223), filed with the SEC on July 29, 2011 and incorporated herein by reference).

 

74


Table of Contents
  10.3    Amended and Restated Loan and Security Agreement, dated as of July 20, 2011, by and among SHC Washington, L.L.C., Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, the lenders from time to time party thereto and Deutsche Bank Securities Inc. (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 001-32223), filed with the SEC on July 25, 2011 and incorporated herein by reference).
  10.4    Amended, Restated and Consolidated Note, dated as of July 20, 2011 (filed as Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 001-32223), filed with the SEC on July 25, 2011 and incorporated herein by reference).
  10.5    Loan Agreement, dated as of July 14, 2011, by and among New Santa Monica Beach Hotel, L.L.C., DTRS Santa Monica, L.L.C., the lenders signatories thereto, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, and Wells Fargo Securities, LLC (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 001-32223), filed with the SEC on July 15, 2011 and incorporated herein by reference).
  10.6    Secured Promissory Note, dated as of July 14, 2011 (filed as Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 001-32223), filed with the SEC on July 15, 2011 and incorporated herein by reference).
  10.7    Loan Agreement, dated as of July 6, 2011, by and among SHC Chopin Plaza, LLC, DTRS InterContinental Miami, LLC and Aareal Capital Corporation (filed as Exhibit 10.8 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (File No. 001-32223), filed with the SEC on August 4, 2011 and incorporated herein by reference).
  10.8    Promissory Note, made as of July 6, 2011, in favor of Aareal Capital Corporation (filed as Exhibit 10.9 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (File No. 001-32223), filed with the SEC on August 4, 2011 and incorporated herein by reference).
* 31.1    Certification of Laurence S. Geller, Chief Executive Officer, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
* 31.2    Certification of Diane M. Morefield, Chief Financial Officer, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
+ 32.1    Certification of Laurence S. Geller, Chief Executive Officer, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
+ 32.2    Certification of Diane M. Morefield, Chief Financial Officer, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
* 99.1    Forward-Looking Information and Risk Factors.
  101.INS    XBRL Instance Document **
  101.SCH    XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document **
  101.CAL    XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document **
  101.LAB    XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document **
  101.PRE    XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document **
  101.DEF    XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document **

 

75


Table of Contents

 

* Filed herewith.

 

+ This exhibit shall not be deemed “filed” for puposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act), or otherwise subject to the liability of that Section. Such exhibit shall not be deemed incorporated into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the Securities Act), or the Exchange Act.

 

** Attached as Exhibit 101 to this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q are the following materials, formatted in XBRL (Extensible Business Reporting Language): (i) the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets at September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010; (ii) the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010; (iii) the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010; and (iv) Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements tagged as blocks of text.

The XBRL related information in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, Exhibit 101, is not deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 11 or 12 of the Securities Act, or Section 18 of the Exchange Act, or otherwise subject to the liabilities of those sections, and is not part of any registration statement to which it may relate, and is not incorporated by reference into any registration statement or other document filed under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, except as is expressly set forth by specific reference in such filing or document.

 

76