Use these links to rapidly review the document
TABLE OF CONTENTS

Table of Contents

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

---

Form 10-Q

Commission file number 333-92047-03

---

EME HOMER CITY GENERATION L.P.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Registrant's telephone number, including area code: (724) 479-9011

---

        Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. YES ý    NO o

        Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). YES o    NO o

        Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of "large accelerated filer," "accelerated filer" and "smaller reporting company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

        Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). YES o    NO ý

        Number of shares outstanding of the registrant's ownership interests as of November 2, 2011: Not applicable.

---

Table of Contents

TABLE OF CONTENTS

i

---

Table of Contents

ii

---

Table of Contents

iii

---

Table of Contents

GLOSSARY

When the following terms and abbreviations appear in the text of this report, they have the meanings indicated below.

iv

---

Table of Contents

PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

EME HOMER CITY GENERATION L.P.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

1

---

Table of Contents

EME HOMER CITY GENERATION L.P.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

2

---

Table of Contents

EME HOMER CITY GENERATION L.P.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

3

---

Table of Contents

EME HOMER CITY GENERATION L.P.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

4

---

Table of Contents

EME HOMER CITY GENERATION L.P.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

5

---

Table of Contents

EME HOMER CITY GENERATION L.P.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
SEPTEMBER 30, 2011
(Unaudited)

Note 1. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Basis of Presentation

EME Homer City Generation L.P.'s (Homer City's) significant accounting policies were described in "Note 1—Summary of Significant Accounting Policies" on page 52 of Homer City's annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010. Homer City follows the same accounting policies for interim reporting purposes, with the exception of accounting principles adopted as of January 1, 2011, as discussed below in "—New Accounting Guidance." This quarterly report should be read in conjunction with such financial statements and notes.

In the opinion of management, all adjustments, including recurring accruals, have been made that are necessary to fairly state the financial position and results of operations and cash flows in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAP) for the periods covered by this quarterly report on Form 10-Q. The results of operations for the three-and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2011 are not necessarily indicative of the operating results for the full year.

Certain prior year reclassifications have been made to conform to the current year financial statement presentation pertaining to immaterial items.

The December 31, 2010 condensed balance sheet data was derived from audited financial statements, but does not include all disclosures required by GAAP.

Cash Equivalents

Cash equivalents included money market funds totaling $4 million and $31 million at September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively. The carrying value of cash equivalents equals the fair value as all investments have maturities of less than three months.

New Accounting Guidance

Accounting Guidance Adopted in 2011

Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures

The Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued an accounting standards update modifying the disclosure requirements related to fair value measurements. Under these requirements, purchases and settlements for Level 3 fair value measurements are presented on a gross basis, rather than net. Homer City adopted this guidance effective January 1, 2011.

6

---

Table of Contents

Accounting Guidance Not Yet Adopted

Fair Value Measurement

In May 2011, the FASB issued an accounting standards update modifying the fair value measurement and disclosure guidance. This guidance prohibits grouping of financial instruments for purposes of fair value measurement and requires the value be based on the individual security. This amendment also results in new disclosures primarily related to Level 3 measurements including quantitative disclosure about unobservable inputs and assumptions, a description of the valuation processes and a narrative description of the sensitivity of the fair value to changes in unobservable inputs. Homer City will adopt this guidance effective January 1, 2012 and does not expect the adoption of this standard will have a material impact on Homer City's results of operations, financial position or cash flows.

Presentation of Comprehensive Income

In June 2011, the FASB issued an accounting standards update on the presentation of comprehensive income. An entity can elect to present items of net income and other comprehensive income in one continuous statement, referred to as the statement of comprehensive income, or in two separate but consecutive statements. Homer City will adopt this guidance effective January 1, 2012. Homer City currently presents the statement of comprehensive income immediately following the statement of income and expects to continue to do so. The adoption of this accounting standards update does not change the items that constitute net income and other comprehensive income.

Note 2. Fair Value Measurements

Recurring Fair Value Measurements

Fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date (referred to as an "exit price"). Fair value of an asset or a liability should consider assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability, including assumptions about nonperformance risk. The fair value of derivative assets' nonperformance risk was not material as of September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010.

Homer City categorizes financial assets and liabilities into a fair value hierarchy based on valuation inputs used to derive fair value. The hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted market prices in active markets for identical assets and liabilities (Level 1 measurements) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3 measurements).

7

---

Table of Contents

The following table sets forth Homer City's assets and liabilities that were accounted for at fair value by level within the fair value hierarchy:

Homer City determines the fair value of transfers in and out of each level at the end of each reporting period. There were no significant transfers between levels during the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010.

Valuation Techniques used to Determine Fair Value

Level 1

Level 1 includes financial assets and liabilities where unadjusted quoted prices in active markets are available at the measurement date for identical assets and liabilities. Financial assets and liabilities classified as Level 1 include exchange-traded derivatives and money market funds.

Level 2

Level 2 pricing inputs include quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets and inputs that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly, for substantially the full term of the derivative instrument. Financial assets and liabilities utilizing Level 2 inputs include over-the-counter derivatives.

Derivative contracts that are over-the-counter traded are valued using pricing models and are generally classified as Level 2. Inputs to the pricing models include forward published or posted clearing prices from exchanges (New York Mercantile Exchange and Intercontinental Exchange) for similar instruments and discount rates. Forward market prices are developed based on the source that best represents trade activity in each market. Broker quotes or prices from exchanges are used to validate and corroborate the primary source. These price quotations reflect mid-market prices (average of bid and ask) and are obtained from sources believed to provide the most liquid market for the commodity. Broker quotes are incorporated when corroborated with other information which may include a combination of prices from exchanges, other brokers, and comparison to executed trades.

8

---

Table of Contents

Level 3

Level 3 includes financial assets and liabilities where fair value is determined using techniques that require significant unobservable inputs. Over-the-counter options, bilateral contracts, capacity contracts, qualifying facilities contracts, derivative contracts that trade infrequently (such as financial transmission rights), and derivative contracts with counterparties that have significant nonperformance risks are classified as Level 3. In circumstances where Edison Mission Marketing & Trading, Inc. (EMMT) cannot verify fair value with observable market transactions, it is possible that a different valuation model could produce a materially different estimate of fair value. As markets continue to develop and more pricing information becomes available, EMMT continues to assess valuation methodologies used to determine fair value.

For derivative contracts that trade infrequently (illiquid financial transmission rights), changes in fair value are based on the hypothetical sale of illiquid positions. Objective criteria are reviewed, including system congestion and other underlying drivers and fair value is adjusted when it is concluded that a change in objective criteria would result in a new valuation that better reflects fair value. For illiquid long-term power agreements, fair value is based upon a discounting of future electricity and natural gas prices derived from a proprietary model using the risk free discount rate for a similar duration contract, adjusted for credit risk and market liquidity. Changes in fair value are based on changes to forward market prices, including forecasted prices for illiquid forward periods. The fair value of the majority of Homer City's derivatives that are classified as Level 3 is determined using uncorroborated non-binding broker quotes and models that may require EMMT to extrapolate short-term observable inputs in order to calculate fair value. Broker quotes are obtained from several brokers and compared against each other for reasonableness.

Long-term Debt

The carrying amount of Homer City's subordinated loan with an affiliate was $490 million at September 30, 2011 and $479 million at December 31, 2010. It is not practicable to estimate the fair value of this financial instrument due to the subordination features of the loan and the provisions of the sale-leaseback agreements for the Homer City plant.

Note 3. Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities

Homer City uses derivative instruments to reduce its exposure to market risks that arise from price fluctuations of electricity, capacity, fuel, emission allowances, and transmission rights. The derivative financial instruments vary in duration, ranging from a few days to several years, depending upon the instrument. To the extent that Homer City does not use derivative instruments to hedge these market risks, the unhedged portions will be subject to the risks and benefits of spot market price movements.

Risk management positions may be designated as cash flow hedges or economic hedges, which are derivatives that are not designated as cash flow hedges. Economic hedges are accounted for at fair value on Homer City's balance sheets with offsetting changes recorded on the statements of operations. For derivative instruments that qualify for hedge accounting treatment, the fair value is recognized, to the extent effective, on Homer City's balance sheets with offsetting changes in fair value recognized in accumulated other comprehensive loss until the related forecasted transaction occurs. The results of derivative activities are recorded in cash flows from operating activities on the statements of cash flows.

Where Homer City's derivative instruments are subject to a master netting agreement and the criteria of authoritative guidance are met, Homer City presents its derivative assets and liabilities on a net basis on its balance sheets.

9

---

Table of Contents

Notional Volumes of Derivative Instruments

The following table summarizes the notional volumes of derivatives used for hedging activities:

 

10

---

Table of Contents

Fair Value of Derivative Instruments

The following table summarizes the fair value of commodity derivative instruments for non-trading purposes reflected on Homer City's balance sheets:

Income Statement Impact of Derivative Instruments

The following table provides the cash flow hedge activity as part of accumulated other comprehensive loss:

For additional information, see Note 8—Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss.

The portion of a cash flow hedge that does not offset the change in the value of the transaction being hedged, which is commonly referred to as the ineffective portion, is immediately recognized in earnings. Homer City recorded net gains (losses) of $2 million and $3 million during the third quarters of 2011 and 2010, respectively, and $4 million and $(4) million during the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively, in operating revenues on the statements of operations representing the amount of cash flow hedge ineffectiveness.

11

---

Table of Contents

The effect of realized and unrealized gains (losses) from derivative instruments used for non-trading purposes on the statements of operations is presented below:

Note 4. Income Taxes

Homer City had an effective income tax rate of 41% and 37% for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. Homer City's effective income tax rate varies from the federal statutory rate of 35% due to state income taxes.

Bonus Depreciation Impact

The Small Business Jobs Act of 2010 and the Tax Relief, Unemployment Insurance Reauthorization and Job Creation Act of 2010 (2010 Tax Relief Act) extended 50% bonus depreciation for qualifying property through 2012 and created a new 100% bonus depreciation for qualifying property placed in service between September 9, 2010 and December 31, 2011. Subject to updated Internal Revenue Service regulations clarifying the definitions of capital expenditures that qualify for 100% bonus depreciation, Homer City's capital expenditures are expected to qualify, accelerating federal tax deductions in 2010 and 2011.

Note 5. Compensation and Benefit Plans

Pension Plans and Postretirement Benefits Other Than Pensions

Pension Plans

During the nine months ended September 30, 2011, Homer City made contributions of $2 million, and during the remainder of 2011, expects to make $0.6 million of additional contributions.

The following were components of pension expense:

Postretirement Benefits Other Than Pensions

During the nine months ended September 30, 2011, Homer City made contributions of $0.6 million, and during the remainder of 2011, expects to make $0.2 million of additional contributions.

12

---

Table of Contents

The following were components of postretirement benefits expense:

Note 6. Commitments and Contingencies

Commitments

Fuel Supply Contracts and Coal Transportation Agreements

At September 30, 2011, Homer City had commitments to purchase coal from third-party suppliers at fixed prices, subject to adjustment clauses. These commitments, together with estimated transportation costs under existing agreements, are estimated to aggregate $314 million, which consists of: $117 million for the remainder of 2011, $144 million in 2012 and $53 million in 2013.

Capital Commitments

At September 30, 2011, Homer City had firm commitments to spend approximately $1 million during the remainder of 2011 and $1 million in 2012 for capital expenditures related to non-environmental improvements. Homer City intends to fund these expenditures with cash generated from operations.

Guarantees and Indemnities

Environmental Indemnity Related to the Homer City Plant

In connection with the acquisition of the Homer City plant, Homer City agreed to indemnify the sellers with respect to specified environmental liabilities before and after the date of sale. Edison Mission Energy (EME) guaranteed this obligation of Homer City. Also, in connection with the sale-leaseback transaction related to the Homer City plant, Homer City agreed to indemnify the lessors for specified environmental liabilities. Due to the nature of the obligations under these indemnity provisions, they are not subject to a maximum potential liability and do not have expiration dates. Homer City has not recorded a liability related to this indemnity. For a discussion of the New Source Review lawsuit filed against Homer City, see "—Contingencies—New Source Review and Other Litigation."

Indemnities Provided under Sale-Leaseback Agreement

In connection with the sale-leaseback transaction related to the Homer City plant, Homer City and its indirect parent, EME, entered into tax indemnity agreements. Under these tax indemnity agreements, Homer City agreed to indemnify the equity investors in the sale-leaseback transaction for specified adverse tax consequences that could result from certain situations set forth in the tax indemnity agreements, including specified defaults under the respective leases The potential indemnity obligation under these tax indemnity agreements could be significant. Due to the nature of these potential

13

---

Table of Contents

obligations, Homer City cannot determine a maximum potential liability and has not recorded a liability related to these indemnities.

EME agreed to indemnify the lessors in the sale-leaseback transaction related to the Homer City plant for certain negative federal income tax consequences should the rent payments be "levelized" for tax purposes and for potential foreign tax credit losses in the event that the lessor's debt is characterized as recourse, rather than non-recourse. This indemnity covers a limited range of possible tax consequences that are unrelated to performance under the lease.

Other Indemnities

Homer City provides other indemnifications through contracts entered into in the normal course of business. Homer City's obligations under these agreements may or may not be limited in terms of time and/or amount, and in some instances Homer City may have recourse against third parties. Homer City has not recorded a liability related to these indemnities. The overall maximum amount of the obligations under these indemnifications cannot be reasonably estimated.

Contingencies

In addition to the matters disclosed in these notes, Homer City is involved in other legal, tax and regulatory proceedings before various courts and governmental agencies regarding matters arising in the ordinary course of business. Homer City believes the outcome of these other proceedings will not materially affect its results of operations or liquidity.

New Source Review and Other Litigation

In January 2011, the United States Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA) filed a complaint in the Western District of Pennsylvania against Homer City, the sale-leaseback owner participants of the Homer City plant, and two prior owners of the Homer City plant. The complaint alleged violations of the Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD) and Title V provisions of the Clean Air Act (CAA), as a result of projects in the 1990s performed by prior owners without PSD permits and the subsequent failure to incorporate emissions limitations that meet best available control technology (BACT) into the station's Title V operating permit. In addition to seeking penalties ranging from $32,500 to $37,500 per violation, per day, the complaint called for an injunction ordering Homer City to install controls sufficient to meet BACT emission rates at all units subject to the complaint and for other remedies. The Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection (PADEP), the State of New York and the State of New Jersey intervened in the lawsuit.

Also in January 2011, two residents filed a complaint in the Western District of Pennsylvania, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, against Homer City, the sale-leaseback owner participants of the Homer City plant, two prior owners of the Homer City plant, EME, and Edison International, claiming that emissions from the Homer City plant had adversely affected their health and property values. The plaintiffs sought to have their suit certified as a class action and requested injunctive relief, the funding of a health assessment study and medical monitoring, as well as compensatory and punitive damages.

On October 12, 2011, all of the claims in the US EPA's lawsuit were dismissed with prejudice. On October 13, 2011, the claims in the purported class action lawsuit that were based on the federal CAA were dismissed with prejudice, while state law statutory and common law claims were dismissed without prejudice to re-file in state court should the plaintiffs choose to do so. Homer City does not know whether the US EPA and the other plaintiffs in these cases will appeal the dismissal of these cases, or

14

---

Table of Contents

whether plaintiffs in the purported class action lawsuit will file a complaint in state court. If the plaintiffs are able to revive the lawsuits, adverse decisions in these cases could involve penalties, remedial actions and damages that could have a material impact on the financial condition and results of operations of Homer City.

Ash Disposal Site

Homer City's ash disposal site is a permitted Class I Residual Waste Landfill, the most stringently regulated of the three categories of residual waste landfills authorized by the regulations of the PADEP. Homer City's permit allows it to dispose of coal combustion by-products, including fly ash, bottom ash, pyrites, gypsum, and miscellaneous plant wastes at the landfill. The wastes are deposited in compacted layers within lifts, or sections. Each lift where coal ash is disposed must be capped and covered when it reaches final grade. Homer City must also monitor groundwater quality at and adjacent to the ash disposal site through a network of monitoring wells and report the results to the PADEP on a periodic basis. In the event that a disposal facility's groundwater monitoring identifies degradation in any of its wells, the PADEP's regulations require the facility to first confirm the existence and nature of the degradation by conducting a groundwater assessment. If the assessment confirms groundwater degradation in excess of the applicable regulatory standards, the facility is then required to prepare and implement an abatement plan that could include measures such as installing a liner in a previously unlined area. To date, no degradation has been found in the groundwater monitoring system at Homer City that would require the development of an assessment or abatement plan. Homer City also provides financial assurance in the form of a surety bond to guarantee its closure and post-closure obligations at the landfill. The estimated closure date is 2018. Based on the remaining capacity of the landfill and the estimated material requiring future disposal, Homer City has begun permitting additional areas for expansion of the landfill. Management does not believe that the costs of maintaining and closing the ash disposal site will have a material impact on Homer City's financial statements under current regulations.

Insurance

Homer City maintains insurance policies that it believes are comparable to those carried by other electric generating facilities of a similar size. The insurance program includes all-risk real and personal property insurance, including coverage for losses from boiler and machinery breakdowns, and the perils of earthquake and flood, subject to certain sublimits. The property insurance program currently covers losses up to $1.6 billion. Under the terms of the participation agreements entered into as part of Homer City's sale-leaseback transaction, Homer City is required to maintain specified minimum insurance coverages with insurers having specific minimum ratings if and to the extent that such insurance is available on a commercially reasonable basis. Some of the insurers providing Homer City's insurance do not meet the minimum ratings required under the participation agreements. Homer City has obtained a waiver under the participation agreements which permits it to maintain its current insurance through June 1, 2012. Homer City also carries general liability insurance covering liabilities to third parties for bodily injury or property damage resulting from operations, automobile liability insurance and excess liability insurance. Limits and deductibles in respect of these insurance policies are consistent with the requirements of the participation agreements. However, some insurers providing general liability coverage do not meet the minimum ratings requirements under the participation agreements. The waiver obtained permits Homer City to retain these insurers for all of its insurance coverages.

15

---

Table of Contents

Note 7. Environmental Developments

Cross-State Air Pollution Rule

On July 6, 2011, the US EPA adopted the Cross-State Air Pollution Rule (CSAPR). CSAPR is the final form of a previously proposed replacement for the Clean Air Interstate Rule (CAIR), originally called the Clean Air Transport Rule that was released in 2010. CSAPR establishes emissions reductions for annual sulfur dioxide (SO₂) emissions and annual and ozone season nitrogen oxide (NO_x) emissions in two phases: a first phase effective January 1, 2012 and, in most states subject to the program (including Pennsylvania), a second phase effective January 1, 2014 that requires additional reductions in annual SO₂ emissions.

CSAPR, like the CAIR, is an allowance-based regulation that provides for emissions trading. Under CSAPR, the amount of actual SO₂ or NO_x emissions from operations will need to be matched by a sufficient amount of SO₂ or NO_x allowances that are either allocated or purchased in the open market. In connection with CSAPR, the US EPA has, for each phase, established SO₂ and NO_x allowance allocations for each state and each generating unit subject to the regulation, and at the close of the annual or seasonal compliance period, units must surrender allowances for each ton of SO₂ and NO_x emitted or face penalties. While trading of allowances is permitted within designated groups of states, the rule provides for penalties against a unit with emissions in excess of its predefined "assurance level," but only if the state in which it is located also exceeds its budgeted emissions level. On October 6, 2011, the US EPA announced a proposed revision to the rule that would effectively eliminate such penalties in the first phase.

The SO₂ allowances allocated to Homer City in CSAPR Phase I (25,797 tons in 2012 and 2013) are significantly lower than the amount that would be required based on Homer City's historical emissions (2010 SO₂ emissions were 112,951 tons). Therefore, pending installation of additional equipment for Units 1 and 2 (Homer City's Unit 3 is equipped with a wet scrubber flue gas desulfurization system to meet environmental standards), Homer City expects that it will be required to procure additional allowances. It is unclear at this time whether Homer City will be able to acquire allowances for 2012 and 2013 in sufficient quantity to cover its normal operations and whether it will be able to pass through the cost of such allowances in the marketplace. Also, Homer City's SO₂ emissions could exceed its assurance level, and, therefore, unless the US EPA's proposed revision to the rule is adopted, Homer City could be subject to penalties depending on whether, collectively, emissions from all of the subject electrical generating facilities in Pennsylvania exceed the state's budgeted emissions level. Accordingly, Homer City is evaluating alternative options, including reduced dispatch and fuel modifications, for complying with Phase I of CSAPR. The cost of allowances, together with possible operational impacts or reductions of output that may be required to comply with Phase I of CSAPR, could have a material effect on Homer City.

Homer City has begun work on designing SO₂ and particulate emissions control equipment for Units 1 and 2. While the Phase II SO₂ emission allowances under CSAPR (11,068 tons) are less than were contemplated under the proposed Clean Air Transport Rule, the additional reductions are not expected to materially change the design for the SO₂ controls at Units 1 and 2. The installation of those SO₂ controls will require capital commitments for the Homer City plant well in advance of the 2014 effective date, including some expenditures in 2011, in order to meet regulatory deadlines. Given the relatively short period of time before Phase II of CSAPR takes effect in 2014, there is no assurance that Homer City will be able to complete all the work that will be required before the deadline. Homer City is continuing to review technologies available to reduce SO₂ and mercury emissions; however, it has not determined the most effective and efficient technology to meet all requirements that may be

16

---

Table of Contents

imposed on it. Consequently, the timing, selection of technology and ultimate capital costs remain uncertain. Based on preliminary estimates, Homer City currently believes the cost of such equipment may be between $600 million and $700 million. An application for a construction permit to install the additional controls was filed on October 3, 2011 with the PADEP.

Homer City does not currently have sufficient capital and does not expect to generate sufficient funds from operations to complete such retrofits and will have to seek third-party financing, which will be subject to decisions by Homer City's lessors, holders of bonds who provided financing for the sale-leaseback transaction and new providers of capital funding. There is no assurance that sufficient financing will be obtained or will not result in significant dilution of Homer City's interest in the Homer City plant.

In July 2011, EME asked the US EPA to stay the effectiveness of CSAPR pending judicial review, and in October 2011, Homer City asked the US EPA to reconsider the rule. In August 2011, Homer City asked the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia to review CSAPR and requested a stay of the rule while its motion is pending. Numerous similar challenges have been filed by other industry participants and by several states.

Proposed Hazardous Air Pollutant Regulations

In March 2011, the US EPA proposed National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants, limiting emissions of hazardous air pollutants from coal- and oil-fired electrical generating units. This regulation is expected to be finalized by December 2011. Based on its continuing review, Homer City does not expect that these standards, if adopted as proposed, would require it to make additional capital requirements beyond those that would be required to comply with CSAPR.

Ozone and Particulates

In September 2011, President Obama announced that the proposed revision to the National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) for ozone, which was expected to have set a more stringent standard for primary ozone and a distinct secondary standard to protect sensitive vegetation and ecosystems, was being withdrawn. The ozone NAAQS established in 2008 remains in place, but the implementation process must be completed before the 0.075 parts-per-million standard can be enforced. The US EPA has indicated that it intends to issue initial area designations of attainment, nonattainment and unclassifiable areas across the nation in 2012. States will then be required to develop and submit state implementation plans outlining how compliance with the 2008 NAAQS will be achieved. New primary and secondary ozone standards are expected in 2014.

Water Quality—Clean Water Act

In March 2011, the US EPA proposed standards under the federal Clean Water Act which would affect cooling water intake structures at generating facilities. The standards are intended to protect aquatic organisms by reducing capture in screens attached to cooling water intake structures (impingement) and in the water volume brought into the facilities (entrainment). The regulations are expected to be finalized by July 2012. Homer City is evaluating the proposed standards and believes, from a preliminary review, that compliance with the proposed standards will be achievable without incurring material additional capital expenditures or operating costs.

17

---

Table of Contents

Greenhouse Gas Litigation Developments

In June 2011, the U.S. Supreme Court dismissed public nuisance claims against five power companies, ruling that the CAA and the US EPA actions it authorizes displace federal common law nuisance claims that might arise from of the emission of greenhouse gases. The court also affirmed the Second Circuit's determination that at least some of the plaintiffs had standing to bring the case. The court did not address whether the CAA also preempts state law claims arising from the same circumstances.

Parties to the case brought by the Alaskan Native Village of Kivalina against Edison International and other defendants, the appeal of which was deferred before the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals pending the Supreme Court's ruling described above, have requested that the appeal recommence and have asked for permission to file additional briefs on the impact of the Supreme Court's ruling. The stay of the appeal has now been lifted and argument before the Ninth Circuit is scheduled for November 2011. Kivalina is seeking damages of up to $400 million for the cost of relocating the village.

On May 27, 2011, private citizens filed a purported class action complaint in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi, naming a large number of defendants, including Edison International and several of its subsidiaries. Homer City was not named. Plaintiffs allege that the defendants' activities resulted in emissions of substantial quantities of greenhouse gases that have contributed to climate change and sea level rise, which in turn are alleged to have increased the destructive force of Hurricane Katrina. The lawsuit alleges causes of action for negligence, public and private nuisance, and trespass, and seeks unspecified compensatory and punitive damages. The claims in this lawsuit are nearly identical to a subset of the claims that were raised against many of the same defendants in a previous lawsuit that was filed in, and dismissed by, the same federal district court where the current case has been filed. Edison International was dismissed as a defendant in this complaint in July 2011.

Note 8. Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss

Accumulated other comprehensive loss consisted of the following:

Unrealized gains on cash flow hedges, net of tax, at September 30, 2011, consist of futures and forward electricity contracts that qualify for hedge accounting. These gains arise because current forecasts of future electricity prices are lower than Homer City's contract prices. Approximately $4 million of unrealized gains on cash flow hedges, net of tax, are expected to be reclassified into earnings during the next 12 months. Management expects that reclassification of net unrealized gains will increase energy revenues recognized at market prices. Actual amounts ultimately reclassified into earnings over the next 12 months could vary materially from this estimated amount as a result of changes in market conditions. The maximum period over which a commodity cash flow hedge is designated is May 31, 2014.

18

---

Table of Contents

Note 9. Supplemental Cash Flows Information

19

---

Table of Contents

ITEM 2.    MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

This quarterly report on Form 10-Q contains "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These statements reflect Homer City's current expectations and projections about future events based on Homer City's knowledge of present facts and circumstances and assumptions about future events and include any statement that does not directly relate to a historical or current fact. Other information distributed by Homer City that is incorporated in this report, or that refers to or incorporates this report, may also contain forward-looking statements. In this quarterly report on Form 10-Q, the words "expects," "believes," "anticipates," "estimates," "projects," "intends," "plans," "probable," "may," "will," "could," "would," "should," and variations of such words and similar expressions, or discussions of strategy or plans, are intended to identify forward-looking statements. Such statements necessarily involve risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those anticipated. Some of the risks, uncertainties and other important factors that could cause results to differ from those currently expected, or that otherwise could impact Homer City, include but are not limited to:

•

Homer City's ability to borrow funds and access the capital markets on reasonable terms;

•

environmental laws and regulations, at both state and federal levels, or changes in the application of those laws, that could require additional expenditures or otherwise affect Homer City's cost and manner of doing business, including compliance with CSAPR and the proposed National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants;

•

supply and demand for electric capacity and energy, and the resulting prices and dispatch volumes, in the wholesale markets to which Homer City's generating units have access;

•

the cost and availability of fuel and fuel transportation services;

•

the cost and availability of emission credits or allowances;

•

transmission congestion in and to each market area and the resulting differences in prices between delivery points;

•

the difficulty of predicting wholesale prices, transmission congestion, energy demand, and other aspects of the complex and volatile markets in which Homer City participates;

•

the availability and creditworthiness of counterparties, and the resulting effects on liquidity in the power and fuel markets in which Homer City operates and/or the ability of counterparties to pay amounts owed in excess of collateral provided in support of their obligations;

•

governmental, statutory, regulatory or administrative changes or initiatives affecting Homer City or the electricity industry generally, including market structure rules and price mitigation strategies adopted by independent system operators and regional transmission organizations;

•

market volatility and other market conditions that could increase Homer City's obligations to post collateral beyond the amounts currently expected, and the potential effect of such conditions on the ability of Homer City to provide sufficient collateral in support of its hedging activities and purchases of fuel;

•

weather conditions, natural disasters and other unforeseen events;

20

---

Table of Contents

•

the extent of additional supplies of capacity, energy and ancillary services from current competitors or new market entrants, including the development of new generation facilities, and technologies that may be able to produce electricity at a lower cost than Homer City's generating facilities and/or increased access by competitors to Homer City's markets as a result of transmission upgrades;

•

operating risks, including equipment failure, availability, heat rate, output, costs of repairs and retrofits, and availability and cost of spare parts;

•

creditworthiness of suppliers and their ability to deliver goods and services under their contractual obligations to Homer City or to pay damages if they fail to fulfill those obligations;

•

effects of legal proceedings, changes in or interpretations of tax laws, rates or policies, and changes in accounting standards; and

•

general political, economic and business conditions.

Additional information about risks and uncertainties, including more detail about the factors described above, is contained throughout this MD&A and in "Item 1A. Risk Factors" on page 16 of Homer City's annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010. Readers are urged to read this entire quarterly report on Form 10-Q and the annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010, including the information incorporated by reference, and to carefully consider the risks, uncertainties and other factors that affect Homer City's business. Forward-looking statements speak only as of the date they are made, and Homer City is not obligated to publicly update or revise forward-looking statements. Readers should review future reports filed by Homer City with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

This MD&A discusses material changes in the results of operations, financial condition and other developments of Homer City since December 31, 2010, and as compared to the third quarter of 2010 and the nine months ended September 30, 2010. This discussion presumes that the reader has read or has access to the MD&A included in Item 7 of Homer City's annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010.

MANAGEMENT'S OVERVIEW

Homer City is a Pennsylvania limited partnership engaged in the business of operating and selling energy and capacity from its three coal-fired electric generating units and related facilities located near Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania with an aggregate capacity of 1,884 MW. The profitability of Homer City has been significantly lower in 2011 compared to 2010 as a result of outages at the Homer City plant and higher fuel costs. In addition, the profitability of Homer City may be adversely impacted by new environmental regulations discussed further below. For discussion of energy and fuel price risks, see "Market Risk Exposures—Commodity Price Risk" and refer to "Market Risks" in Item 1A on page 17 of Homer City's annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010. As a result, Homer City may incur net losses during 2011 and in subsequent years unless energy and capacity prices increase or its costs decline.

Highlights of Operating Results

Homer City's net income for the third quarter ended September 30, 2011 decreased $12 million compared to the corresponding period of 2010. The third quarter decrease in earnings was primarily due to lower capacity revenues and higher coal costs. Homer City's net loss for the nine months ended

21

---

Table of Contents

September 30, 2011 was $38 million, compared to net income of $16 million in the corresponding period of 2010. The year-to-date decrease in earnings was primarily due to lower energy revenues driven by lower generation, lower capacity revenues and higher plant maintenance costs from outages. Partially offsetting the decrease were unrealized derivative gains of $2 million in 2011 compared to losses of $13 million in 2010.

Cross-State Air Pollution Rule

On July 6, 2011, the US EPA adopted the CSAPR. CSAPR is the final form of a previously proposed replacement for the CAIR, originally called the Clean Air Transport Rule that was released in 2010. CSAPR establishes emissions reductions for annual SO₂ emissions and annual and ozone season NO_x emissions in two phases: a first phase effective January 1, 2012 and, in most states subject to the program (including Pennsylvania), a second phase effective January 1, 2014 that requires additional reductions in annual SO₂ emissions.

CSAPR, like the CAIR, is an allowance-based regulation that provides for emissions trading. Under CSAPR, the amount of actual SO₂ or NO_x emissions from operations will need to be matched by a sufficient amount of SO₂ or NO_x allowances that are either allocated or purchased in the open market. In connection with CSAPR, the US EPA has, for each phase, established SO₂ and NO_x allowance allocations for each state and each generating unit subject to the regulation, and at the close of the annual or seasonal compliance period, units must surrender allowances for each ton of SO₂ and NO_x emitted or face penalties. While trading of allowances is permitted within designated groups of states, the rule provides for penalties against a unit with emissions in excess of its predefined "assurance level," but only if the state in which it is located also exceeds its budgeted emissions level. On October 6, 2011, the US EPA announced a proposed revision to the rule that would effectively eliminate such penalties in the first phase.

The SO₂ allowances allocated to Homer City in CSAPR Phase I (25,797 tons in 2012 and 2013) are significantly lower than the amount that would be required based on Homer City's historical emissions (2010 SO₂ emissions were 112,951 tons). Therefore, pending installation of additional equipment for Units 1 and 2 (Homer City's Unit 3 is equipped with a wet scrubber flue gas desulfurization system to meet environmental standards), Homer City expects that it will be required to procure additional allowances. It is unclear at this time whether Homer City will be able to acquire allowances for 2012 and 2013 in sufficient quantity to cover its normal operations and whether it will be able to pass through the cost of such allowances in the marketplace. Also, Homer City's SO₂ emissions could exceed its assurance level, and, therefore, unless the US EPA's proposed revision to the rule is adopted, Homer City could be subject to penalties depending on whether, collectively, emissions from all of the subject electrical generating facilities in Pennsylvania exceed the state's budgeted emissions level. Accordingly, Homer City is evaluating alternative options, including reduced dispatch and fuel modifications, for complying with Phase I of CSAPR. The cost of allowances, together with possible operational impacts or reductions of output that may be required to comply with Phase I of CSAPR, could have a material effect on Homer City.

Homer City has begun work on designing SO₂ and particulate emissions control equipment for Units 1 and 2. While the Phase II SO₂ emission allowances under CSAPR (11,068 tons) are less than were contemplated under the proposed Clean Air Transport Rule, the additional reductions are not expected to materially change the design for the SO₂ controls at Units 1 and 2. The installation of those SO₂ controls will require capital commitments for the Homer City plant well in advance of the 2014 effective date, including some expenditures in 2011, in order to meet regulatory deadlines. Given the relatively short period of time before Phase II of CSAPR takes effect in 2014, there is no assurance that Homer City will be able to complete all the work that will be required before the deadline. Homer

22

---

Table of Contents

City is continuing to review technologies available to reduce SO₂ and mercury emissions; however, it has not determined the most effective and efficient technology to meet all requirements that may be imposed on it. Consequently, the timing, selection of technology and ultimate capital costs remain uncertain. Based on preliminary estimates, Homer City currently believes the cost of such equipment may be between $600 million and $700 million. An application for a construction permit to install the additional controls was filed on October 3, 2011 with the PADEP.

Capital Needs and Liquidity

Homer City does not currently have sufficient capital and does not expect to generate sufficient funds from operations to complete retrofits effectively required by CSAPR Phase II. EME is under no legal obligation to, and has chosen not to, provide funding. Homer City expects to fund $13 million of project costs during the remainder of 2011. However, Homer City will need third-party capital to undertake the retrofits required by 2014 under CSAPR and to fund capital costs beginning in 2012 in order to complete the requisite retrofits by early 2014. However, restrictions under the agreements entered into as part of Homer City's 2001 sale-leaseback transaction affect, and in some cases significantly limit or prohibit, Homer City's ability to incur indebtedness or make capital expenditures. Consequently, Homer City's ability to install environmental compliance equipment will be dependent on approvals by its lessors and holders of bonds who provided financing for the sale-leaseback transaction, and upon its ability to obtain new capital funding.

Homer City has engaged a financial advisor and commenced a process to obtain capital funding from third parties to install the environmental improvements. Homer City's objective is to maximize the value of its leasehold interest while obtaining the incremental capital needed to make such improvements. There can be no assurance that Homer City will be able to raise the financing necessary to install the required SO₂ control equipment in a timely manner or on terms that will not result in a significant dilution of its interest in the Homer City plant.

Homer City believes that the persistence of low power prices, combined with the outages suffered earlier this year and the possible impacts of compliance with CSAPR Phase I in 2012, will make it unlikely that Homer City will meet the covenant requirements of its sale-leaseback documents relating to the payment of equity rent at April 1, 2012. Under the sale-leaseback documents, rent payments are comprised of two components, senior rent and equity rent. Senior rent is used exclusively for debt service to holders of senior secured bonds issued in connection with the sale-leaseback transaction, while equity rent is paid to the owner-lessors. In order to pay equity rent, among other requirements, Homer City must meet historical and projected senior rent service coverage ratios of 1.7 to 1 (subject to reduction to 1.3 to 1 under certain circumstances). A failure to pay equity rent does not entitle the owner-lessors to foreclose upon Homer City's leasehold interest, but it does result in the suspension of Homer City's ability to make permitted distributions. Moreover, the ability to make permitted distributions would be permanently frozen if a failure to pay equity rent when due was not cured within nine months, or even if timely cured, there occurred more than one additional failure to pay equity rent when due at any future time during the term of the lease. Homer City is not subject to any minimum historical and projected senior rent service coverage ratios except as conditions to distributions and equity rent payments. Also, failure by Homer City to pay equity rent when due in April 2012 could trigger termination of the $47 million senior rent reserve letter of credit. Homer City would then be required to fund the senior rent reserve, and failure to do so could entitle counterparties to seek available remedies under the sale-leaseback documents, including termination or foreclosure upon the leasehold interest.

EME's subsidiary, EMMT, enters into energy and capacity transactions on behalf of Homer City pursuant to an intercompany agreement. Those transactions are generally back-to-back transactions in

23

---

Table of Contents

which EMMT enters into a transaction with a third party as a principal and then enters into an equivalent transaction with Homer City. Homer City would be required to indemnify EMMT for losses arising out of its default or nonperformance under the intercompany agreement. In the case of energy and capacity sales, this could include losses incurred by EMMT to fulfill its third-party obligations through market transactions. In the case of capacity sales, it could also include penalties under the PJM tariffs in an amount (excluding a refund of any capacity payments received by EMMT) equal to the greater of 20% of the capacity payments or $20 per MW-day.

Failure of Homer City to find an economic manner to continue plant operations, by installing the required equipment or otherwise, could result in a foreclosure on its leasehold interest and/or a curtailment of plant operations. Curtailment of plant operations or a significant reduction of the value of Homer City's interest in the plant could have an adverse effect on future financial results, cash flow, financial flexibility and assets of Homer City compared to historical levels.

24

---

Table of Contents

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Summary

The table below summarizes total revenues as well as key performance measures related to coal-fired generation, which represents the majority of Homer City's operations.

Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Disclosures and Statistical Definitions

Average Realized Energy Price

The average realized energy price reflects the average price at which energy is sold into the market including the effects of hedges, real-time and day-ahead sales and PJM fees and ancillary services. It is determined by dividing (i) operating revenues less unrealized gains (losses) and other non-energy related revenues by (ii) generation as shown in the table below. Revenues related to capacity sales are excluded from the calculation of average realized energy price.

The average realized energy price is presented as an aid in understanding the operating results of the Homer City plant. Average realized energy price is a non-GAAP performance measure since such statistical measure excludes unrealized gains or losses recorded as operating revenues. Management

25

---

Table of Contents

believes that the average realized energy price is meaningful for investors as this information reflects the impact of hedge contracts at the time of actual generation in period-over-period comparisons or as compared to real-time market prices.

Statistical Definitions

•

Equivalent availability reflects the impact of the unit's inability to achieve full load, referred to as derating, as well as outages which result in a complete unit shutdown. The coal plants are not available during periods of planned and unplanned maintenance. The equivalent availability factor is defined as the number of MWh the coal plants are available to generate electricity divided by the product of the capacity of the coal plants (in MW) and the number of hours in the period.

•

The capacity factor indicates how much power a unit generated compared to the maximum amount of power that could be generated according to its rating. It is defined as the actual number of MWh generated by the coal plants divided by the product of the capacity of the coal plants (in MW) and the number of hours in the period.

•

The load factor indicates how much power a unit generated compared to the maximum amount of power that a unit was available to generate electricity. It is determined by dividing capacity factor by the equivalent availability factor.

•

The forced outage rate refers to forced outages and deratings excluding events outside of management's control as defined by NERC. Examples include floods, tornado damage and transmission outages.

Seasonality

Due to fluctuations in electric demand resulting from warm weather during the summer months and cold weather during the winter months, electric revenues from the Homer City plant normally vary substantially on a seasonal basis. In addition, maintenance outages generally are scheduled during periods of lower projected electric demand (spring and fall), further reducing generation and increasing major maintenance costs which are recorded as an expense when incurred. Accordingly, earnings from the Homer City plant are seasonal and have significant variability from quarter to quarter. Seasonal fluctuations may also be affected by changes in market prices. For further discussion regarding market prices, see "Market Risk Exposures—Commodity Price Risk—Energy Price Risk."

Operating Income

Operating income from the Homer City plant decreased $22 million and $95 million for the third quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2011, respectively, compared to the corresponding periods of 2010. The third quarter decrease in operating income was primarily attributable to lower capacity revenues and higher coal costs. The year-to-date decrease was attributable to lower energy revenues driven by lower generation, lower capacity revenues, and higher plant maintenance and equipment retirement costs related to outages at Units 1 and 2. These decreases were partially offset by unrealized gains in 2011 compared to unrealized losses in 2010 related to hedge contracts and lower fuel costs. The decline in fuel costs was primarily due to lower generation, mostly offset by higher coal costs. Included in fuel costs were net costs of emission allowances of $2 million and $1 million during the third quarters of 2011 and 2010, respectively, and $3 million and $6 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively.

26

---

Table of Contents

Included in operating revenues were unrealized gains (losses) from hedge activities of $(3) million and $1 million for the third quarters of 2011 and 2010, respectively, and $2 million and $(13) million for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. Unrealized gains (losses) in 2011 were attributable to both economic hedge contracts that are accounted for at fair value with offsetting changes recorded on the statements of operations and the ineffective portion of forward and futures contracts which are derivatives that qualify as cash flow hedges. Unrealized gains (losses) in 2010 were attributable to the ineffective portion of forwards and futures contracts. The ineffective portion of hedge contracts at Homer City was attributable to changes in the difference between energy prices at PJM West Hub (the settlement point under forward contracts) and the energy prices at the Homer City busbar (the delivery point where power generated by the Homer City plant is delivered into the transmission system).

Income Taxes

Homer City had an effective income tax rate of 41% and 37% for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. Homer City's effective income tax rate varies from the federal statutory rate of 35% due to state income taxes.

New Accounting Guidance

For a discussion of new accounting guidance affecting Homer City, see "EME Homer City Generation L.P. Notes to Financial Statements—Note 1. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies—New Accounting Guidance."

27

---

Table of Contents

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

Liquidity

The use of Homer City's cash generated from operations is restricted by the sale-leaseback agreements.

Homer City Outage

During the first half of 2011, Homer City Units 1 and 2 were off line due to a steam pipe rupture at Unit 1 and precautionary maintenance at Unit 2. While Unit 1 returned to service on April 5, 2011 and Unit 2 on May 25, 2011, the outages and the continuation of low power prices impacted Homer City's liquidity. As a result, in order to have sufficient working capital available for operating expenses and to pay the equity portion of Homer City's rent payment that was due April 1, 2011 to the owner-lessors, Homer City had to defer certain fuel deliveries, arrange for accelerated payments by EMMT for future energy deliveries under an intercompany arrangement in place between EMMT and Homer City, and draw $12 million from the $20 million equity rent reserve established under its sale-leaseback transaction documents. At September 30, 2011, the equity rent reserve balance was restored back to $20 million, and Homer City had delivered energy sufficient to eliminate the accelerated payments by EMMT. Homer City must continue to make equity rent payments in order to be entitled to make future distributions. Effective April 1, 2011, EMMT allocated to Homer City the benefit of an arrangement that allows EMMT to deliver power into the NYISO from Homer City. Accordingly, since April 1, 2011, these revenues have been recorded as part of Homer City's revenues in lieu of their prior classification as EMMT trading revenues. EMMT realized trading revenues of $28 million under this arrangement in 2010.

The actions described above also resulted in Homer City being in compliance with the covenant requirements of its sale-leaseback documents relating to the payment of equity rent at April 1, 2011. For additional discussion regarding Homer City's liquidity, see "Management's Overview—Cross-State Air Pollution Rule," "Management's Overview—Capital Needs and Liquidity" and "—Payments Made Under Subordinated Revolving Loan and Tax Payments—Key Ratio Affecting Distributions."

Capital Investment Plan

Forecasted capital expenditures through 2013 are as follows:

The capital investment plan set forth in the previous table does not include environmental capital expenditures that Homer City will be required to undertake to meet the requirements of CSAPR. The timing, selection of technology and ultimate capital costs remain uncertain. For a discussion of environmental regulations, see "Management's Overview—Cross-State Air Pollution Rule," "Management's Overview—Capital Needs and Liquidity," and refer to "Environmental Matters and Regulations" in Item 1 on page 10 of Homer City's annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010.

28

---

Table of Contents

Plant capital expenditures relate to non-environmental projects such as upgrades to boiler and turbine controls, replacement of major boiler components, development of a coal-cleaning plant refuse site and a new ash disposal site. Homer City plans to fund these expenditures with cash on hand or cash generated from operations.

Cash Flow

At September 30, 2011, Homer City had cash and cash equivalents of $108 million compared to $132 million at December 31, 2010. Net cash provided by operating activities decreased $57 million in the first nine months of 2011, compared to the first nine months of 2010. The 2011 decrease was primarily due to net losses in 2011 compared to net income in 2010 and a reduction in amounts due to affiliate related to the tax-allocation agreement, partially offset by an increase in interest payable to affiliate under the subordinated revolving loan agreement.

Net cash used in financing activities increased $17 million in the first nine months of 2011 compared to the first nine months of 2010. During 2011, Homer City paid $8 million higher lease financing payments and borrowed $9 million, net less under the affiliate subordinated revolving loan agreement compared to the same period in 2010.

Net cash used in investing activities decreased $4 million in the first nine months of 2011 compared to the first nine months of 2010. During 2011, Homer City spent $5 million less for capital expenditures in 2011.

Credit Ratings

Overview

Homer City is not currently rated. Credit ratings for EME and EMMT as of September 30, 2011 were as follows:

All the above ratings are on negative outlook. Homer City cannot provide assurance that the current credit ratings above will remain in effect for any given period of time or that one or more of these ratings will not be lowered. Homer City notes that these credit ratings are not recommendations to buy, sell or hold securities and may be revised at any time by a rating agency.

Credit Rating of EMMT

For a discussion of the effect of EMMT's credit rating on Homer City's ability to sell forward the output of its plant through EMMT, refer to "Credit Ratings" in Item 7 on page 32 of Homer City's annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010.

Payments Made Under Subordinated Revolving Loan and Tax Payments

The following table summarizes the payments by Homer City under its subordinated revolving loan with Edison Mission Finance Co., a subsidiary of EME, that constitute permitted distributions pursuant

29

---

Table of Contents

to the terms of the sale-leaseback transaction or any payments made pursuant to tax-allocation agreements.

Key Ratio Affecting Distributions

Set forth below is the key ratio required under the lease covenants contained in Homer City's sale-leaseback agreements for the 12 months ended September 30, 2011:

As indicated above, the actual senior rent service coverage ratio was below the covenant threshold for the 12 months ended September 30, 2011, which currently precludes Homer City from making distributions, including repayment of certain intercompany loans. For additional information, see "Management's Overview—Capital Needs and Liquidity" and "—Liquidity—Homer City Outage."

For a more detailed description of the restrictions binding Homer City refer to "Capital Expenditures and Lease Covenants" in Item 7 on page 29 of Homer City's annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010.

Contractual Obligations and Contingencies

Fuel Supply Contracts and Coal Transportation Agreements

For a discussion of fuel supply contracts and coal transportation agreements, see "EME Homer City Generation L.P. Notes to Financial Statements—Note 6. Commitments and Contingencies—Commitments—Fuel Supply Contracts and Coal Transportation Agreements."

New Source Review and Other Litigation

For a discussion of the New Source Review lawsuit, see "EME Homer City Generation L.P. Notes to Financial Statements—Note 6. Commitments and Contingencies—Contingencies—New Source Review and Other Litigation."

Environmental Matters and Regulations

For a discussion of Homer City's environmental matters, refer to "Environmental Matters and Regulations" in Item 1 on page 10 of Homer City's annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010. There have been no significant developments with respect to environmental matters specifically affecting Homer City since the filing of Homer City's annual report, except as set forth in "EME Homer City Generation L.P. Notes to Financial Statements—Note 7. Environmental Developments."

30

---

Table of Contents

MARKET RISK EXPOSURES

For a detailed discussion of Homer City's market risk exposures, including commodity price risk, credit risk and interest rate risk, refer to "Market Risk Exposures" in Item 7 on page 34 of Homer City's annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010.

Derivative Instruments

Unrealized Gains and Losses

Homer City classifies unrealized gains and losses from derivative instruments (other than the effective portion of derivatives that qualify for hedge accounting) as part of operating revenues. The following table summarizes unrealized gains (losses):

At September 30, 2011, cumulative unrealized losses of $3 million were recognized from non-qualifying hedge contracts or the ineffective portion of cash flow hedges related to the remainder of 2011.

Fair Value Disclosures

In determining the fair value of Homer City's derivative positions, Homer City uses third-party market pricing where available. For further explanation of the fair value hierarchy and a discussion of Homer City's derivative instruments, see "EME Homer City Generation L.P. Notes to Financial Statements—Note 2. Fair Value Measurements" and "—Note 3. Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities," respectively.

Commodity Price Risk

Energy Price Risk

Energy and capacity from the Homer City plant are sold under terms, including price, duration and quantity, arranged by EMMT with customers through a combination of bilateral agreements (resulting from negotiations or from auctions), forward energy sales and spot market sales. Power is sold into PJM at spot prices based upon locational marginal pricing. Hedging transactions related to generation at the Homer City plant are generally entered into at the PJM West Hub. In addition, energy hedging transactions may be entered into using natural gas.

31

---

Table of Contents

The following table depicts the average historical market prices for energy per megawatt-hour at the locations indicated for the first nine months of 2011 and 2010:

The following table sets forth the forward market prices for energy per megawatt-hour as quoted for sales into the PJM West Hub at September 30, 2011:

Forward market prices at the PJM West Hub fluctuate as a result of a number of factors, including natural gas prices, transmission congestion, changes in market rules, electricity demand (which in turn is affected by weather, economic growth and other factors), plant outages in the region, and the amount of existing and planned power plant capacity. The actual spot prices for electricity delivered by the Homer City plant into these markets may vary materially from the forward market prices set forth in the preceding table.

EMMT engages in hedging activities for the Homer City plant to hedge the risk of future change in the price of electricity. The following table summarizes Homer City's hedge positions (including load requirements services contracts and forward contracts accounted for on the accrual basis) at September 30, 2011 for electricity expected to be generated during the remainder of 2011 and in 2012 and 2013:

32

---

Table of Contents

Capacity Price Risk

The following table summarizes the status of capacity sales for Homer City at September 30, 2011:

Basis Risk

During the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, prices at the Homer City busbar were lower than the PJM West Hub by an average of 9% and 15%, respectively, due to transmission congestion in PJM.

Coal Price Risk

The Homer City plant purchases coal primarily from mines located near the facilities in Pennsylvania. Coal purchases are made under a variety of supply agreements. The following table summarizes the amount of coal under contract at September 30, 2011 for the remainder of 2011 and the following two years:

Homer City is subject to price risk for purchases of coal that are not under contract. Prices of Northern Appalachian (NAPP) coal are related to the price of coal purchased for the Homer City plant. The market price of NAPP coal (with 13,000 Btu per pound heat content and <3.0 pounds of SO₂ per MMBtu sulfur content) increased to a price of $77.25 per ton at September 30, 2011, compared to a price of $70 per ton at December 31, 2010, as reported by the Energy Information Administration.

33

---

Table of Contents

Emission Allowances Price Risk

Under CSAPR, beginning January 1, 2012, the amount of SO₂ that a plant emits in its operation will need to be matched by a sufficient amount of SO₂ allowances designated under this program (CSAPR SO₂ allowances) that are either allocated to the plant under the CSAPR program or purchased in the open market. SO₂ allowances under the federal Acid Rain Program cannot be used to satisfy the requirements under CSAPR. Homer City will be impacted by market prices for additional CSAPR SO₂ allowances required, but availability and market prices are uncertain. For additional information on CSAPR, see "Management's Overview—Cross-State Air Pollution Rule" and "EME Homer City Generation L.P. Notes to Financial Statements—Note 7. Environmental Developments—Cross-State Air Pollution Rule."

Credit Risk

Homer City derives a significant source of its operating revenues from electric power sold into the PJM market by EMMT. Sales into PJM accounted for approximately 91% of Homer City's operating revenues for the nine months ended September 30, 2011.

Interest Rate Risk

Homer City has mitigated the risk of interest rate fluctuations by obtaining fixed rate financing on its subordinated revolving loan with Edison Mission Finance. Homer City does not believe that interest rate fluctuations will have a material adverse effect on its financial position or results of operations.

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING ESTIMATES AND POLICIES

For a discussion of Homer City's critical accounting policies, refer to "Critical Accounting Estimates and Policies" in Item 7 on page 39 of Homer City's annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010.

ITEM 3.    QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

For a discussion of market risk sensitive instruments, refer to "Market Risk Exposures" in Item 7 on page 34 of Homer City's annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010. For an update to that disclosure, see "Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Market Risk Exposures."

ITEM 4.    CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Disclosure Controls and Procedures

Homer City's management, under the supervision and with the participation of the partnership's principal executive officer and principal financial officer, has evaluated the effectiveness of Homer City's disclosure controls and procedures (as that term is defined in Rules 13a-15(e) or 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act")) as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on that evaluation, the principal executive officer and principal financial officer concluded that, as of the end of the period, Homer City's disclosure controls and procedures were effective.

34

---

Table of Contents

Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

There were no changes in Homer City's internal control over financial reporting (as that term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) or 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) during the period to which this report relates that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, Homer City's internal control over financial reporting.

35

---

Table of Contents

PART II – OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1.    LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

For a discussion of Homer City's legal proceedings, refer to "Contingencies" in Item 8 on page 80 of Homer City's annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010. There have been no significant developments with respect to legal proceedings specifically affecting Homer City since the filing of Homer City's annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010, except as follows:

New Source Review and Other Litigation

On October 12, 2011, all of the claims in the US EPA's New Source Review litigation were dismissed with prejudice. On October 13, 2011, the claims in the purported class action that were based on the federal CAA were dismissed with prejudice, while state law statutory and common law claims were dismissed without prejudice to re-file in state court should the plaintiffs choose to do so.

ITEM 1A.    RISK FACTORS

For a discussion of the risks, uncertainties, and other important factors which could materially affect Homer City's business, financial condition, or future results, refer to "Item 1A. Risk Factors" on page 16 of Homer City's annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010. The risks described in Homer City's annual report on Form 10-K and in this report are not the only risks facing Homer City. Additional risks and uncertainties that are not currently known, or that are currently deemed to be immaterial, also may materially adversely affect Homer City's business, financial condition or future results.

ITEM 4.    REMOVED AND RESERVED

ITEM 6.    EXHIBITS

36

---

Table of Contents

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

37

---