Wintahenderson International, Inc. - FORM 10-K

Attached files

file	filename
EXCEL - IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT - Wintahenderson International, Inc.	Financial_Report.xls
EX-31.1 - CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002. - Wintahenderson International, Inc.	f10k2011ex31i_europaacq1.htm
EX-32.1 - CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO 18 U.S. C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES OXLEY ACT OF 2002. - Wintahenderson International, Inc.	f10k2011ex32i_europaacq1.htm

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

x ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended June 30, 2011

¨ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from ____________ to ____________

Commission File Number: 000-54038

EUROPA ACQUISITION I, INC.

(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)

NEVADA		27-3819552
(State or other jurisdiction of		(IRS Employer Identification No.)
incorporation or organization)

5 Penn Plaza, 14th fl
New York, NY		10001
(Address of principal executive offices)		(Zip Code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (732) 409-1212

Securities registered under Section 12(b) of the Act:

Title of each class registered:		Name of each exchange on which registered:
None		None

Securities registered under Section 12(g) of the Act:

Common Stock, no par value

(Title of class)

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes ¨ No x

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes ¨ No x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company.

Large accelerated filer	¨	Accelerated filer	¨

Non-accelerated filer	¨	Smaller reporting company	x
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes x No ¨

Aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates as of December 31, 2010: None.

As of September 27, 2011, there were approximately 100,000 shares of the registrant’s common stock outstanding.

TABLE OF CONTENTS


PART I		PAGE
Item 1.	Business.	1
Item 1A.	Risk Factors.	2
Item 2.	Properties.	3
Item 3.	Legal Proceedings.	3
Item 4.	(Removed and Reserved).	3

PART II
Item 5.	Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities.	3
Item 6.	Selected Financial Data.	3
Item 7.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operation.	3
Item 7A.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.	6
Item 8.	Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.	F-1
Item 9.	Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure.	7
ITEM 9A.	Controls and Procedures.	7
ITEM 9B.	Other Information.	7

PART III
Item 10.	Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance.	7
Item 11.	Executive Compensation.	9
Item 12.	Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters.	9
Item 13.	Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence.	9
Item 14.	Principal Accounting Fees and Services.	10

PART IV
Item 15.	Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules.	11

SIGNATURES

CAUTIONARY STATEMENT ON FORWARD-LOOKING INFORMATION

This Annual Report on Form 10-K (this “Report”) contains “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). Forward-looking statements discuss matters that are not historical facts. Because they discuss future events or conditions, forward-looking statements may include words such as “anticipate,” “believe,” “estimate,” “intend,” “could,” “should,” “would,” “may,” “seek,” “plan,” “might,” “will,” “expect,” “predict,” “project,” “forecast,” “potential,” “continue” negatives thereof or similar expressions. Forward-looking statements speak only as of the date they are made, are based on various underlying assumptions and current expectations about the future and are not guarantees. Such statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause our actual results, level of activity, performance or achievement to be materially different from the results of operations or plans expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements.

We cannot predict all of the risks and uncertainties. Accordingly, such information should not be regarded as representations that the results or conditions described in such statements or that our objectives and plans will be achieved and we do not assume any responsibility for the accuracy or completeness of any of these forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements are found at various places throughout this Report and include information concerning possible or assumed future results of our operations, including statements about potential acquisition or merger targets; business strategies; future cash flows; financing plans; plans and objectives of management, any other statements regarding future acquisitions, future cash needs, future operations, business plans and future financial results, and any other statements that are not historical facts.

These forward-looking statements represent our intentions, plans, expectations, assumptions and beliefs about future events and are subject to risks, uncertainties and other factors. Many of those factors are outside of our control and could cause actual results to differ materially from the results expressed or implied by those forward-looking statements. In light of these risks, uncertainties and assumptions, the events described in the forward-looking statements might not occur or might occur to a different extent or at a different time than we have described. You are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date of this Report. All subsequent written and oral forward-looking statements concerning other matters addressed in this Report and attributable to us or any person acting on our behalf are expressly qualified in their entirety by the cautionary statements contained or referred to in this Report.

Except to the extent required by law, we undertake no obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events, a change in events, conditions, circumstances or assumptions underlying such statements, or otherwise.

CERTAIN TERMS USED IN THIS REPORT

When this report uses the words “we,” “us,” “our,” and the “Company,” they refer to Europa Acquisition I, Inc. “SEC” refers to the Securities and Exchange Commission.

PART I

Item 1.

Business.

Business Development

The Company was incorporated in the State of Nevada on June 30, 2010. The Company was formed as a vehicle to pursue a business combination and has made no efforts to identify a possible business combination. Since inception, the Company has been engaged in organizing efforts and obtaining initial financing. As a result, the Company has not conducted negotiations or entered into a letter of intent concerning any target business.

On October 1, 2010 (the “Closing Date”), the Company entered into a Stock Purchase Agreement (the “Agreement”) by and among the Company, Peter Reichard and Peter Coker, each a former stockholder of the Company, and Beige Holdings, LLC (“Beige”) and Marlin Financial Group, Inc. (“Marlin”) pursuant to which Beige and Marlin acquired all of the Company’s then outstanding shares of common stock in exchange for payment by Beige and Marlin to Messrs. Reichard and Coker in the aggregate amount of $15,000 (the “October Transaction”). Such shares represented all of our then outstanding shares of common stock.

Upon the closing of the October Transaction, Mr. Reichard resigned as our President, effective immediately, and Gregory Schwartz was appointed as our President and Chief Executive Officer, effectively immediately. In addition, Mr. Reichard resigned as a member of our Board of Directors and Mr. Schwartz was appointed as the Chairman of the Board of Directors. In accordance with Rule 14f-1 under the Exchange Act, Mr. Reichard’s resignation from, and Mr. Schwartz’s appointment to, our Board of Directors became effective on October 18, 2010.

On January 13, 2011, the Company, Beige, Marlin and Allan C. Schwartz entered into a stock purchase agreement pursuant to which Beige and Marlin sold an aggregate of 90,000 shares of our common stock, which represented 90% of the then outstanding shares of our common stock, to Allan C. Schwartz for a total purchase price of $18,750 (the “January Transaction”). In addition, the Company and Allan C. Schwartz covenanted to Beige that Gregory Schwartz shall not be removed from any of his positions with the Company without the prior written consent by Beige.

Business of Issuer

The Company is a “blank check” company. The SEC defines those companies as “any development stage company that is issuing a penny stock, within the meaning of Section 3 (a)(51) of the Exchange Act, and that has no specific business plan or purpose, or has indicated that its business plan is to merge with an unidentified company or companies.” Pursuant to Rule 12b-2 under the Exchange Act, the Company also qualifies as a “shell company,” because it has no or nominal assets (other than cash) and no or nominal operations. Many states have enacted statutes, rules and regulations limiting the sale of securities of “blank check” companies in their respective jurisdictions. Management does not intend to undertake any efforts to cause a market to develop in our securities, either debt or equity, until we have successfully concluded a business combination. The Company intends to comply with the periodic reporting requirements of the Exchange Act for so long as it is subject to those requirements.

The Company was organized as a vehicle to investigate and, if such investigation warrants, acquire a target company or business seeking the perceived advantages of being a publicly held corporation. The Company’s principal business objective for the next 12 months and beyond such time will be to achieve long-term growth potential through a combination with a business rather than immediate, short-term earnings. The Company will not restrict its potential candidate target companies to any specific business, industry or geographical location and, thus, may acquire any type of business.

The analysis of new business opportunities will be undertaken by or under the supervision of Gregory Schwartz, our sole officer and director. As of this date the Company has not entered into any definitive agreement with any party, nor have there been any specific discussions with any potential business combination candidate regarding business opportunities for the Company. The Company has unrestricted flexibility in seeking, analyzing and participating in potential business opportunities. In its efforts to analyze potential acquisition targets, the Company will consider the following factors:

·	Potential for growth, indicated by new technology, anticipated market expansion or new products;

·	Competitive position as compared to other firms of similar size and experience within the industry segment as well as within the industry as a whole;

·	Strength and diversity of management, either in place or scheduled for recruitment;

·	Capital requirements and anticipated availability of required funds, to be provided by the Company or from operations, through the sale of additional securities, through joint ventures or similar arrangements or from other sources;

·	The cost of participation by the Company as compared to the perceived tangible and intangible values and potentials;

·	The extent to which the business opportunity can be advanced;

·	The accessibility of required management expertise, personnel, raw materials, services, professional assistance and other required items; and

·	Other relevant factors.

In applying the foregoing criteria, no one of which will be controlling, management will attempt to analyze all factors and circumstances and make a determination based upon reasonable investigative measures and available data. Potentially available business opportunities may occur in many different industries, and at various stages of development, all of which will make the task of comparative investigation and analysis of such business opportunities extremely difficult and complex. Due to the Company’s limited capital available for investigation, the Company may not discover or adequately evaluate adverse facts about the opportunity to be acquired.

Form of Acquisition

The manner in which the Company participates in an opportunity will depend upon the nature of the opportunity, the respective needs and desires of the Company and the promoters of the opportunity, and the relative negotiating strength of the Company and such promoters. We do not intend to solicit prospective investors for any transaction. We will rely on word of mouth to locate potential merger candidates.

It is likely that the Company will acquire its participation in a business opportunity through the issuance of common stock or other securities of the Company. Although the terms of any such transaction cannot be predicted, it should be noted that in certain circumstances the criteria for determining whether or not an acquisition is a so-called “tax free” reorganization under Section 368(a)(1) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”) depends upon whether the owners of the acquired business own 80% or more of the voting stock of the surviving entity. If a transaction were structured to take advantage of these provisions rather than other “tax free” provisions provided under the Code, all prior stockholders would in such circumstances retain 20% or less of the total issued and outstanding shares of the surviving entity. Under other circumstances, depending upon the relative negotiating strength of the parties, prior stockholders may retain substantially less than 20% of the total issued and outstanding shares of the surviving entity. This could result in substantial additional dilution to the equity of those who were stockholders of the Company prior to such reorganization.

The present stockholders of the Company will likely not have control of a majority of the voting securities of the Company following a reorganization transaction. As part of such a transaction, all, or a majority of, the Company’s directors may resign and one or more new directors may be appointed without any vote by stockholders.

In the case of an acquisition, the transaction may be accomplished upon the sole determination of management without any vote or approval by stockholders. In the case of a statutory merger or consolidation directly involving the Company, it will likely be necessary to call a stockholders’ meeting and obtain the approval of the holders of a majority of the outstanding securities. The necessity to obtain such stockholder approval may result in delay and additional expense in the consummation of any proposed transaction and will also give rise to certain appraisal rights to dissenting stockholders. Most likely, management will seek to structure any such transaction so as not to require stockholder approval. Notwithstanding same since we currently have only 2 shareholders, we intend to provide our shareholders with complete disclosure concerning a possible target entity and its business, including audited financial statements (if available to us) prior to any merger or acquisition.

It is anticipated that the investigation of specific business opportunities and the negotiation, drafting and execution of relevant agreements, disclosure documents and other instruments will require substantial management time and attention and substantial cost for accountants, attorneys and others. If a decision is made not to participate in a specific business opportunity, the costs theretofore incurred in the related investigation might not be recoverable. Furthermore, even if an agreement is reached for the participation in a specific business opportunity, the failure to consummate that transaction may result in the loss to the Company of the related costs incurred.

We presently have no employees apart from our management. Our officers and directors are engaged in outside business activities and anticipate that they will devote to our business very limited time until the acquisition of a successful business opportunity has been identified. We expect no significant changes in the number of our employees other than such changes, if any, incident to a business combination.

Item 1A. Risk Factors.

Smaller reporting companies are not required to provide the information required by this item.

Item 2. Properties.

The Company neither rents nor owns any properties. We utilize the office space and equipment of our management at no cost. Management estimates such amounts to be immaterial. We currently have no policy with respect to investments or interests in real estate, real estate mortgages or securities of, or interests in, persons primarily engaged in real estate activities.

Item 3. Legal Proceedings.

We are currently not involved in any litigation that we believe could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition or results of operations. There is no action, suit, proceeding, inquiry or investigation before or by any court, public board, government agency, self-regulatory organization or body pending or, to the knowledge of the executive officers of our company or any of our subsidiaries, threatened against or affecting our company, our common stock, any of our subsidiaries or of our companies or our subsidiaries’ officers or directors in their capacities as such, in which an adverse decision could have a material adverse effect.

Item 4. (Removed and Reserved).

PART II

Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities.

No established public trading market exists for the Company’s common stock. There are no plans, proposals, arrangements or understandings with any person with regard to the development of a trading market in any of the Company’s common stock.

Common Stock

Our Certificate of Incorporation authorizes the issuance of up to 100,000,000 shares of common stock, par value $0.001 per share. The Common Stock is not listed on a publicly-traded market. As of September 27, 2011, there was one stockholder of record holding an aggregate of 100,000 shares of common stock.

Preferred Stock

Our certificate of incorporation authorizes the issuance of up to 10,000,000 shares of preferred stock, par value $0.001 per share. As of September 27, 2011, there were no shares of preferred stock issued and outstanding.

Dividends

To date, we have not declared or paid any dividends on our common stock. We currently do not anticipate paying any cash dividends in the foreseeable future on our common stock, when issued pursuant to this offering. Although we intend to retain our earnings, if any, to finance the exploration and growth of our business, our Board of Directors will have the discretion to declare and pay dividends in the future.

Payment of dividends in the future will depend upon our earnings, capital requirements, and other factors, which our Board of Directors may deem relevant.

Securities Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans

We presently do not have any equity based or other long-term incentive programs. In the future, we may adopt and establish an equity-based or other long-term incentive plan if it is in the best interest of the Company and our stockholders to do so.

Item 6. Selected Financial Data.

Smaller reporting companies are not required to provide the information required by this item.

Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operation.

The following discussion provides information which management believes is relevant to an assessment and understanding of our results of operations and financial condition. The discussion should be read along with our financial statements and notes thereto contained elsewhere in this Report. The following discussion and analysis contains forward-looking statements, which involve risks and uncertainties. Our actual results may differ significantly from the results, expectations and plans discussed in these forward-looking statements. See “Cautionary Statement On Forward-Looking Information.”

Plan of Operation

We were organized as a vehicle to investigate and, if such investigation warrants, acquire a target company or business seeking the perceived advantages of being a publicly held corporation. Our principal business objective for the next 12 months and beyond such time will be to achieve long-term growth potential through a combination with a business rather than immediate, short-term earnings. We will not restrict our potential candidate target companies to any specific business, industry or geographical location and, thus, may acquire any type of business.

We do not currently engage in any business activities that provide cash flow. The costs of investigating and analyzing business combinations for the next 12 months and beyond such time will be paid with money in our treasury or with additional amounts, as necessary, to be loaned to or invested in us by our stockholders, management or other investors.

During the next 12 months we anticipate incurring costs related to filing of Exchange Act reports and consummating an acquisition.

We believe we will be able to meet these costs through use of funds in our treasury and additional amounts, as necessary, to be loaned by or invested in us by our stockholders, management or other investors.

We are in the development stage and have negative working capital, negative stockholders’ equity and have not earned any revenues from operations to date. These conditions raise substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern. We are currently devoting our efforts to locating merger candidates. Our ability to continue as a going concern is dependent upon our ability to develop additional sources of capital, locate and complete a merger with another company, and ultimately, achieve profitable operations.

We may consider a business which has recently commenced operations, is a developing company in need of additional funds for expansion into new products or markets, is seeking to develop a new product or service, or is an established business which may be experiencing financial or operating difficulties and is in need of additional capital. In the alternative, a business combination may involve the acquisition of, or merger with, a company which does not need substantial additional capital, but which desires to establish a public trading market for its shares, while avoiding, among other things, the time delays, significant expense, and loss of voting control which may occur in a public offering.

Our officers and directors have not had any preliminary contact or discussions with any representative of any other entity regarding a business combination with us. Any target business that is selected may be a financially unstable company or an entity in its early stages of development or growth, including entities without established records of sales or earnings. In that event, we will be subject to numerous risks inherent in the business and operations of financially unstable and early stage or potential emerging growth companies. In addition, we may effect a business combination with an entity in an industry characterized by a high level of risk, and, although our management will endeavor to evaluate the risks inherent in a particular target business, there can be no assurance that we will properly ascertain or assess all significant risks.

Our management anticipates that it will likely be able to effect only one business combination, due primarily to our limited financing and the dilution of interest for present and prospective stockholders, which is likely to occur as a result of our management’s plan to offer a controlling interest to a target business in order to achieve a tax-free reorganization. This lack of diversification should be considered a substantial risk in investing in us, because it will not permit us to offset potential losses from one venture against gains from another.

We anticipate that the selection of a business combination will be complex and extremely risky. Because of general economic conditions, rapid technological advances being made in some industries and shortages of available capital, our management believes that there are numerous firms seeking even the limited additional capital which we will have and/or the perceived benefits of becoming a publicly traded corporation. Such perceived benefits of becoming a publicly traded corporation include, among other things, facilitating or improving the terms on which additional equity financing may be obtained, providing liquidity for the principals of and investors in a business, creating a means for providing incentive stock options or similar benefits to key employees, and offering greater flexibility in structuring acquisitions, joint ventures and the like through the issuance of stock. Potentially available business combinations may occur in many different industries and at various stages of development, all of which will make the task of comparative investigation and analysis of such business opportunities extremely difficult and complex.

Recent Developments

On October 1, 2010, Messrs. Reichard and Coker sold an aggregate of 75,000 shares of our common stock to Beige and an aggregate of 25,000 shares of our common stock to Marlin for an aggregate purchase price of $15,000. Such shares represented all of our then outstanding shares of common stock. In addition, Mr. Reichard resigned as our President, effective immediately, and Mr. Schwartz was appointed as our President and Chief Executive Officer, effectively immediately. In addition, Mr. Reichard resigned as a member of our Board of Directors and Mr. Schwartz was appointed as the Chairman of the Board of Directors. In accordance with Rule 14f-1 under the Exchange Act, Mr. Reichard’s resignation from, and Mr. Wang’s appointment to, our Board of Directors became effective on October 18, 2010.

On January 13, 2011, the Company, Beige, Marlin and Allan C. Schwartz entered into a stock purchase agreement pursuant to which Beige and Marlin sold an aggregate of 90,000 shares of our common stock, which represented 90% of the then outstanding shares of our common stock, to Allan C. Schwartz for a total purchase price of $18,750. In addition, the Company and Allan C. Schwartz covenanted to Beige that Gregory Schwartz shall not be removed from any of his positions with the Company without the prior written consent by Beige.

Results of Operation

We did not have any operating income from inception through June 30, 2011. For the fiscal year ended June 30, 2011, we recognized a net loss of $27,944. Expenses for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2011 were comprised of costs mainly associated with legal, accounting and office expense.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

At June 30, 2011, we had cash of $2,864. We intend to rely upon the issuance of common stock and loans from shareholders to fund administrative expenses pending acquisition of an operating company. However, our shareholders are under no obligation to provide such funding.

Management anticipates seeking out a target company through solicitation. Such solicitation may include newspaper or magazine advertisements, mailings and other distributions to law firms, accounting firms, investment bankers, financial advisors and similar persons, the use of one or more internet sites and similar methods. No estimate can be made as to the number of persons who will be contacted or solicited. Management may engage in such solicitation directly or may employ one or more other entities to conduct or assist in such solicitation. Management and its affiliates will pay referral fees to consultants and others who refer target businesses for mergers into public companies in which management and its affiliates have an interest. Payments are made if a business combination occurs, and may consist of cash or a portion of the stock in the Company retained by management and its affiliates, or both.

As discussed above, we incurred a net loss of $27,944 for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2011. Cash used in operating activities during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2011 was $24,764. As of June 30, 2011, we had a stockholders’ deficiency of $13,626. Accordingly, there is substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern. Our ability to continue as a going concern is dependent on our ability to raise additional capital and implement our business plan. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might be necessary if we are unable to continue as a going concern.

Management believes that actions presently being taken to obtain additional funding and implement its strategic plans provide the opportunity for us to continue as a going concern

Gregory Schwartz will supervise the search for target companies as potential candidates for a business combination. Gregory Schwartz will pay, at his own expense, any costs he incurs in supervising the search for a target company. Gregory Schwartz may enter into agreements with other consultants to assist in locating a target company and may share stock received by it or cash resulting from the sale of its securities with such other consultants.

Critical Accounting Policies

We have identified the policies outlined below as critical to our business operations and an understanding of our results of operations. The list is not intended to be a comprehensive list of all of our accounting policies. In many cases, the accounting treatment of a particular transaction is specifically dictated by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States, with no need for management's judgment in their application.

The Company accounts for income taxes under FASB Codification Topic 740-10-25 (“ASC 740-10-25”). Under ASC 740-10-25, deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. Under ASC 740-10-25, the effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date of operations, financial position or liquidity for the periods presented in this report.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In June 2003, the SEC adopted final rules under Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (“Section 404”), as amended by SEC Release No. 33-9072 on October 13, 2009. Commencing with the Company’s Annual Report for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2011, the Company is required to include a report of management on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. The internal control report must include a statement of management’s responsibility for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting for the Company; of management’s assessment of the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of year end; of the framework used by management to evaluate the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting; and that the Company’s independent accounting firm has issued an attestation report on management’s assessment of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting, which report is also required to be filed as part of the Annual Report on Form 10-K.

In January 2010, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued FASB Accounting Standards Update No. 2010-01 “Equity Topic 505 – Accounting for Distributions to Shareholders with Components of Stock and Cash”, which clarifies that the stock portion of a distribution to shareholders that allows them to elect to receive cash or stock with a potential limitation on the total amount of cash that all shareholders can elect to receive in the aggregate is considered a share issuance that is reflected in EPS prospectively and is not a stock dividend for purposes of applying Topics 505 and 260 (Equity and Earnings Per Share (“EPS”)). Those distributions should be accounted for and included in EPS calculations in accordance with paragraphs 480-10-25- 14 and 260-10-45-45 through 45-47 of the FASB Accounting Standards codification. The amendments in this Update also provide a technical correction to the Accounting Standards Codification. The correction moves guidance that was previously included in the Overview and Background Section to the definition of a stock dividend in the Master Glossary. That guidance indicates that a stock dividend takes nothing from the property of the corporation and adds nothing to the interests of the stockholders. It also indicates that the proportional interest of each shareholder remains the same, and is a key factor to consider in determining whether a distribution is a stock dividend.

In January 2010, FASB issued FASB Accounting Standards Update No. 2010-02 “Consolidation Topic 810 – Accounting and Reporting for Decreases in Ownership of a Subsidiary – a Scope Clarification”, which provides amendments to Subtopic 810-10 and related guidance within U.S. GAAP to clarify that the scope of the decrease in ownership provisions of the Subtopic and related guidance applies to the following:

	1.	A subsidiary or group of assets that is a business or nonprofit activity

	2.	A subsidiary that is a business or nonprofit activity that is transferred to an equity method investee or joint venture

	3.	An exchange of a group of assets that constitutes a business or nonprofit activity for a noncontrolling interest in an entity (including an equity method investee or joint venture).

The amendments in this Update also clarify that the decrease in ownership guidance in Subtopic 810-10 does not apply to the following transactions even if they involve businesses:

	1.	Sales of in substance real estate. Entities should apply the sale of real estate guidance in Subtopics 360-20 (Property, Plant, and Equipment) and 976-605 (Retail/Land) to such transactions.

	2.	Conveyances of oil and gas mineral rights. Entities should apply the mineral property conveyance and related transactions guidance in Subtopic 932-360 (Oil and Gas-Property, Plant, and Equipment) to such transactions.

If a decrease in ownership occurs in a subsidiary that is not a business or nonprofit activity, an entity first needs to consider whether the substance of the transaction causing the decrease in ownership is addressed in other U.S. GAAP, such as transfers of financial assets, revenue recognition, exchanges of nonmonetary assets, sales of in substance real estate, or conveyances of oil and gas mineral rights, and apply that guidance as applicable. If no other guidance exists, an entity should apply the guidance in Subtopic 810-10.

Management does not believe that any other recently issued, but not yet effective accounting pronouncements, if adopted, would have a material effect on the accompanying financial statements.

Off Balance Sheet Arrangements

None.

Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.

Smaller reporting companies are not required to provide the information required by this item.

Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.

INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Reports of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firms	F-2
Balance Sheets	F-4
Statements of Operations	F-5
Statements of Cash Flows	F-6
Statement of Stockholders’ Equity (Deficiency)	F-7
Notes to Financial Statements	F-8

F-1

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Directors and

Stockholders of Europa Acquisition I, Inc.

We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Europa Acquisition I, Inc. (a development stage Company) (the “Company”) as of June 30, 2011 and the related statements of operations, stockholders’ deficit, and cash flows for the period June 30, 2010 (inception) through June 30, 2011. These financial statements are the responsibility of the company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. The company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audit included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Europa Acquisition I, Inc. (a development stage Company) as of June 30, 2011, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the period June 30, 2010 (inception) through June 30, 2011, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

The accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed further in Note 6, the Company has been in the development stage since its inception (June 30, 2010) and continues to incur significant losses. The Company’s viability is dependent upon its ability to obtain future financing and the success of its future operations. These factors raise substantial doubt as to the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. Management’s plan in regard to these matters is also described in Note 1. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

/s/Lake & Associates, CPA’s LLC

Lake & Associates, CPA’s LLC

Schaumburg, Illinois

September 12, 2011

F-2

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Directors of:

Europa Acquisition I, Inc.

(A Development Stage Company)

We have audited the accompanying balance sheet of Europa Acquisition I, Inc. (a development stage company) (the “Company”) as of June 30, 2010 and the related statements of operations, changes in stockholders’ deficiency and cash flows for the one day period ending June 30, 2010 (inception). These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly in all material respects, the financial position of Europa Acquisition I, Inc. (a development stage company) as of June 30, 2010 and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the one day period ending June 30, 2010 (inception) in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

The accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 4 to the financial statements, the Company is in the development stage with limited operations, a net loss of $2,250 for the one day period ending June 30, 2010 (inception) and a working capital and stockholders' deficiency of $1,250 as of June 30, 2010. These factors raise substantial doubt about the Company's ability to continue as a going concern. Management's plans concerning these matters are also described in Note 4. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

/s/ WEBB & COMPANY, P.A.

WEBB & COMPANY, P.A.

Certified Public Accountants

Boynton Beach, Florida

July 14, 2010

F-3

Europa Acquisition I, Inc
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)
BALANCE SHEETS
June 30, 2011


ASSETS
	June 30, 2011			June 30, 2010
CURRENT ASSETS:
Cash & equivalents	$	2,864		$	-

Total Assets	$	2,864		$	-



LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' DEFICIT

CURRENT LIABILITIES:
Accounts payable	$	4,430		$	1,250
Loan payable		12,060			-

Total Liabilities		16,490			1,250

SHAREHOLDERS' DEFICIT
Preferred stock $0.001 par value; 10,000,0000 shares authorized
none issued and outstanding		-			-
Common stock (no par value, 100,000,000 shares authorized;
100,000 issued and outstanding)		100			100
Additional paid-in-capital		16,468			900
Deficit accumulated during the development stage		(30,194	)		(2,250	)
	$	(13,626	)	$	(1,250	)

Total Liabilities and Shareholders' Deficit	$	2,864		$	-

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited financial statements

F-4

Europa Acquisition I, Inc.
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS



					For the period from				Cumulative from
	For the twelve months				Inception (June 30, 2010)				From June 30, 2010 (Inception)
	ended June 30, 2011				to June 30, 2010				to June 30, 2011

Revenue:		$	-			$	-			$	-

Operating Expenses:
Professional Fees			13,550				1,000				14,550
General and Administrative			14,394				1,250				15,644
Total Operating Expenses			27,944				2,250				30,194

Net loss		$	(27,944	)		$	(2,250	)		$	(30,194	)

Basic and diluted net loss per share		$	(0.28	)		$	(0.02	)		$	(0.30	)

Weighted average number of shares used in calculating
basic and diluted net loss per share			100,000				100,000				100,000

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited financial statements

F-5

Europa Acquisition I, Inc.
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

				For the period from			Cumulative from
	For the year			Inception (June 30, 2010)			From June 30, 2010 (Inception)
	ended June 30, 2011			to June 30, 2010			to June 30, 2011
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net loss	$	(27,944	)	$	(2,250	)	$	(30,194	)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operations
Changes in operating assets and liabilites
Increase (decrease) in accounts payable		3,180			1,250			4,430

Net cash used in operating activities		(24,764	)		(1,000	)		(25,764	)

CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Loan payable		12,060			-			12,060
Shareholder contributions		15,568			-			15,568
Proceeds from issuance of 100,000 shares common stock		-			1,000			1,000

Net cash provided by financing activities		27,628			1,000			28,628


NET INCREASE IN CASH & CASH EQUIVALENTS		2,864			-			2,864

CASH & CASH EQUIVALENTS, BEGINNING BALANCE		-			-			-

CASH & CASH EQUIVALENTS, ENDING BALANCE	$	2,864		$	-		$	2,864

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited financial statements

F-6

Europa Acquisition I, Inc.
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)
STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (DEFICIENCY)



									Deficit
									Accumulated
						Additional			During the
	Common Stock					Paid-in			Development
	Shares		Amount			Capital			Stage				Total

Inception - June 30, 2010		-		$	-		$	-		$	-			$	-

Common shares issued for		100,000			100			900			-				1,000
cash at $0.001 per share (par value $0.0001)
Loss for the period from inception		-			-			-			(2,250	)			(2,250	)
on June 30, 2010 to June 30, 2010
Balance - June 30, 2010		100,000			100			900			(2,250	)			(1,250	)

Investment		-			-			15,568			-				15,568

Loss for the period ended June 30, 2011		-			-			-			(27,944	)			(27,944	)

Balance June 30, 2011		100,000		$	100		$	16,468		$	(30,194	)		$	(13,626	)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited financial statements

F-7

EUROPA ACQUISITION I, INC.

(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

AS OF JUNE 30, 2011

NOTE 1 - DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS AND DEVELOPMENT STAGE RISK

ORGANIZATION

Europa Acquisition I, Inc. (a development stage company) (the "Company") was incorporated under the laws of the State of Nevada on June 30, 2010. The Company was organized to provide business services and financing to emerging growth entities.

The Company was formed to engage in any lawful corporate undertaking, including, but not limited to, selected mergers and acquisitions. It has been in the developmental stage since inception and has no operations to date. It will attempt to locate and negotiate with a business entity for the combination of that target company with us. The combination will normally take the form of a merger, stock-for-stock exchange or stock-for-assets exchange. In most instances, the target company will wish to structure the business combination to be within the definition of a tax-free reorganization under Section 351 or Section 368 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. No assurances can be given that it will be successful in locating or negotiating with any target company.

Activities during the development stage include developing the business plan and raising capital.

Going Concern

The Company’s financial statements are prepared using generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America applicable to a going concern, which contemplates the realization of assets and the satisfaction of liabilities in the normal course of business. The Company has not yet established an ongoing source of revenues sufficient to cover its operating costs and allow it to continue as a going concern. The ability of the Company to continue as a going concern is dependent on the Company obtaining adequate capital to fund operating losses until it becomes profitable. If the Company is unable to obtain adequate capital, it could be forced to cease operations. The accompanying financial statements do not include any adjustments that might be necessary if the Company is unable to continue as a going concern.

Management’s Plan to Continue as a Going Concern

The Company has met its historical working capital requirements from the sale of its capital shares and loans from shareholders. In order to continue as a going concern, the Company will need, among other things, additional capital resources. Management’s plans to obtain such resources for the Company include (1) obtaining capital from management and significant shareholders sufficient to meet its minimal operating expenses, and (2) seeking out and completing a merger with an existing operating company. However, management cannot provide any assurance that the Company will be successful in accomplishing any of its plans.

The ability of the Company to continue as a going concern is dependent upon its ability to successfully accomplish the plans described in the preceding paragraph and eventually secure other sources of financing and attain profitable operations. In order to minimize the financial burden on the Company, Narayan Capital Funding Corp., the Company’s majority shareholder, has agreed to provide non-interest bearing demand loans to the Company to pay the Company’s annual audit fees, filing costs, legal fees and other costs as long as the Board of Directors of the Company and Narayan Capital Funding Corp. deem it necessary. The Company will account for each such payment as a demand loan and, accordingly, be recorded as a current liability on the Company’s books. There can be no assurance that such financial support shall be ongoing or available on terms or conditions acceptable to the Company.

F-8

Development Stage Risk

Since its inception, the Company has been dependent upon the receipt of capital investment to fund its continuing activities. In addition to the normal risks associated with a new business venture, there can be no assurance that the Company's business plan will be successfully executed. Our ability to execute our business plan will depend on our ability to obtain additional financing and achieve a profitable level of operations. There can be no assurance that sufficient financing will be obtained. Further, we cannot give any assurance that we will generate substantial revenues or that our business operations will prove to be profitable.

NOTE 2 – ACCOUNTING POLICIES

BASIS OF PRESENTATION – DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY

The Company has not earned any revenue from operations. Accordingly, the Company’s activities have been accounted for as those of a “Development Stage Enterprise” as set forth in ASC 915 “Development Stage Entities”, which was previously Financial Accounting Standards Board Statement No. 7. Among the disclosures required by ASC 915 are that the Company’s financial statements be identified as those of a development stage company, and that the statements of operations, stockholders’ equity/(deficit) and cash flows disclose activity since the date of the Company’s inception.

CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS

The Company considers all highly liquid debt instruments with original maturities of three months or less to be cash equivalents.

EARNINGS PER SHARE

The Company computes earnings per share in accordance with the Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 260 “Earnings per Share” which was previously Statement of Accounting Standards No. 128, "Earnings per Share”. Under the provisions of ASC 260, basic earnings per share is computed by dividing the net income (loss) for the period by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per share is computed by dividing the net income (loss) for the period by the weighted average number of common and potentially dilutive common shares outstanding during the period. There were no potentially dilutive common shares outstanding during the period.

USE OF ESTIMATES

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect certain reported amounts and disclosures. Accordingly, actual results could differ from those estimates.

INCOME TAXES

The Company accounts for income taxes as outlined in ASC 740 “Income Taxes”, which was previously Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes.” Under the asset and liability method of ASC 740, deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the estimated future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates in effect for the year in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled.

FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

The Company considers that the carrying amount of financial instruments, including accounts payable, approximates fair value because of the short maturity of these instruments.

F-9

RELATED PARTIES

Related parties, which can be a corporation, individual, investor or another entity are considered to be related if the party has the ability, directly or indirectly, to control the other party or exercise significant influence over the Company in making financial and operating decisions. Companies are also considered to be related if they are subject to common control or common significant influence. The Company has these relationships.

RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS

The company has adopted all recently issued accounting pronouncements. The adoption of the accounting pronouncements, including those not yet effective, is not anticipated to have a material effect on the financial position or results of operations of the Company.

NOTE 3 – SHAREHOLDERS’ DEFICIENCY

On June 30, 2010, the Company issued 100,000 shares of common stock to its founders having a fair value of $1,000 ($0.01/share) in exchange for services provided (See Note 4).

NOTE 4 - RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

On June 30, 2010, the Company issued 100,000 shares of common stock to its founders having a fair value of $1,000 ($0.01/share) in exchange for services provided (See Note 3).

F-10

Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure.

None.

Item 9A. Controls and Procedures.

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

Pursuant to Rule 13a-15(b) under the Exchange Act, the Company carried out an evaluation, with the participation of the Company’s management, including its principal executive officer and principal financial officer, of the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined under Rule 13a-15(e) under the Exchange Act) as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based upon that evaluation, the Company’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures are effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports that the Company files or submits under the Exchange Act, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to the Company’s management, including the Company’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

A system of controls, no matter how well designed and operated, cannot provide absolute assurance that the objectives of the system of controls are met, and no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within a company have been detected.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

No changes were made to our internal control over financial reporting during our most recently completed fiscal quarter that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

This Report does not include a report of management’s assessment regarding internal control over financial reporting or an attestation report of the Company’s registered public accounting firm due to a transition period established by rules of the SEC for newly public companies.

Item 9B. Other Information.

None.

PART III

Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance.

Our sole director and officer, as of September 27, 2011, is set forth below. On October 1, 2010, Mr. Reichard resigned as our President, effective immediately, and Mr. Schwartz was appointed as our President and Chief Executive Officer, effectively immediately. In addition, Mr. Reichard resigned as a member of our Board of Directors and Mr. Schwartz was appointed as the Chairman of the Board of Directors. In accordance with Rule 14f-1 under the Exchange Act, Mr. Reichard’s resignation from, and Mr. Schwartz’s appointment to, our Board of Directors became effective on October 18, 2010.

Name		Age		Position and Offices Held
Gregory Schwartz		23		Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer

GREGORY SCHWARTZ grew up in New York City, where he graduated from Hunter College (Bcs.) Cum Laude. After graduation Mr. Schwartz worked as an analyst at Beige Group, a diversified merchant bank. During his tenure, Mr. Schwartz was responsible for market research and complex financial modeling.

Employment Agreements

We currently do not have an employment agreement with Mr. Schwartz.

However, as disclosed above, on January 13, 2011, the Company, Beige, Marlin and Allan C. Schwartz entered into a stock purchase agreement pursuant to which the Company and Allan C. Schwartz covenanted to Beige that Gregory Schwartz shall not be removed from any of his positions with the Company without the prior written consent by Beige.

Certain Legal Proceedings

To the best of our knowledge, none of our directors or executive officers has, during the past ten years:

·	been convicted in a criminal proceeding or been subject to a pending criminal proceeding (excluding traffic violations and other minor offenses);

·	had any bankruptcy petition filed by or against the business or property of the person, or of any partnership, corporation or business association of which he was a general partner or executive officer, either at the time of the bankruptcy filing or within two years prior to that time;

been subject to any order, judgment, or decree, not subsequently reversed, suspended or vacated, of any court of competent jurisdiction or federal or state authority, permanently or temporarily enjoining, barring, suspending or otherwise limiting, his involvement in any type of business, securities, futures, commodities, investment, banking, savings and loan, or insurance activities, or to be associated with persons engaged in any such activity;

·	been found by a court of competent jurisdiction in a civil action or by the Commission or the Commodity Futures Trading Commission to have violated a federal or state securities or commodities law, and the judgment has not been reversed, suspended, or vacated;

been the subject of, or a party to, any federal or state judicial or administrative order, judgment, decree, or finding, not subsequently reversed, suspended or vacated (not including any settlement of a civil proceeding among private litigants), relating to an alleged violation of any federal or state securities or commodities law or regulation, any law or regulation respecting financial institutions or insurance companies including, but not limited to, a temporary or permanent injunction, order of disgorgement or restitution, civil money penalty or temporary or permanent cease-and-desist order, or removal or prohibition order, or any law or regulation prohibiting mail or wire fraud or fraud in connection with any business entity; or

been the subject of, or a party to, any sanction or order, not subsequently reversed, suspended or vacated, of any self-regulatory organization (as defined in Section 3(a)(26) of the Exchange Act), any registered entity (as defined in Section 1(a)(29) of the Commodity Exchange Act), or any equivalent exchange, association, entity or organization that has disciplinary authority over its members or persons associated with a member.

Except as set forth in our discussion below in “Certain Relationships and Related Transactions,” none of our directors or executive officers has been involved in any transactions with us or any of our directors, executive officers, affiliates or associates which are required to be disclosed pursuant to the rules and regulations of the SEC.

Compliance with Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act

Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires our directors and executive officers and persons who beneficially own more than 10% of our common stock to file initial reports of ownership and changes in ownership with the SEC. To the Company’s knowledge based on a review of copies of such reports furnished to us, all of the Company’s current directors, executive officers and beneficial owners of more than 10% of our common stock have complied with all Section 16(a) filing requirements with respect to the fiscal year ended June 30, 2011, other than as set forth below.

Peter Reichard, our former sole director and officer and a former beneficial owner of more than 10% of our common stock, failed to file (A) a Form 3 upon the effectiveness of the Company’s registration statement on Form 10 under the Exchange Act filed with the SEC and (B) a Form 4 to report the sale of 60,000 shares of our common stock pursuant to the October Transaction;

Peter Coker, a former beneficial owner or more than 10% of our common stock, failed to file (A) a Form 3 upon the effectiveness of the Company’s registration statement on Form 10 under the Exchange Act filed with the SEC and (B) a Form 4 to report the sale of 40,000 shares of our common stock pursuant to the to the October Transaction

·	Marlin, a former beneficial owner or more than 10% of our common stock, failed to file a Form 4 to report the sale of 25,000 shares pursuant to the January Transaction.

·	Beige, a current beneficial owner of more than 10% of our common stock, did not timely file a Form 4 to report the sale of 65,000 shares of our common stock pursuant to the January Transaction..

Code of Ethics

We have not adopted a code of ethics that applies to our principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer, or persons performing similar functions, because of the small number of persons involved in the management of the Company.

Board Committees

Our Board of Directors has no separate committees and our Board of Directors acts as the audit committee and the compensation committee. We do not have an audit committee financial expert serving on our Board of Directors.

Item 11. Executive Compensation.

Neither our current nor our former officers and directors have received any compensation for services rendered to us, have received compensation from us in the past, and are not accruing any compensation pursuant to any agreement with us. However, our officers and directors anticipate receiving benefits as a beneficial stockholder of us and, possibly, in other ways.

No retirement, pension, profit sharing, stock option or insurance programs or other similar programs have been adopted by us for the benefit of our employees. We had no options outstanding as of June 30, 2011.

It is possible that, after the Company successfully consummates a business combination with an unaffiliated entity, that entity may desire to employ or retain one or a number of members of our management for the purposes of providing services to the surviving entity. However, the Company has adopted a policy whereby the offer of any post-transaction employment to members of management will not be a consideration in our decision whether to undertake any proposed transaction. There are no understandings or agreements regarding compensation our management will receive after a business combination or otherwise.

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

Our Board of Directors does not have a compensation committee and the entire Board of Directors performs the functions of a compensation committee. No member of our Board of Directors has a relationship that would constitute an interlocking relationship with our executive officers or directors or another entity.

Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management.

The following table sets forth certain information as of September 27, 2011 with respect to the holdings of: (1) each person known to us to be the beneficial owner of more than 5% of our common stock; (2) each of our directors and named executive officers; and (3) all directors and executive officers as a group. To the best of our knowledge, each of the persons named in the table below as beneficially owning the shares set forth therein has sole voting power and sole investment power with respect to such shares, unless otherwise indicated. Unless otherwise specified, the address of each of the persons set forth below is in care of the Company.

Name and Address	Amount and Nature of Beneficial Ownership	Percentage of Class
Directors and named executive officers
Gregory Schwartz	0	*
All directors and executive officers as a group (1 person)	0	*

Beneficial owners of more than 5% of our common stock
Beige Holdings, LLC	10,000	10%
Allan C. Schwartz (1)	90,000	90%

* Denotes less than 1%

(1) Allan C. Schwartz is the father of Gregory Schwartz.

We are not aware of any arrangements which may at a subsequent date result in a change of control of the Company.

Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence.

Transactions with Related Persons

There have been no transactions since the beginning of the fiscal year ended June 30, 2011, nor are there any currently proposed transactions, in which the Company was a participant and the amount exceeds $120,000 and in which any “related person” as such term is defined in Item 404 of Regulation S-K promulgated by the SEC had or will have a direct or indirect material interest.

Director Independence

We do not have any independent directors. Because our common stock is not currently listed on a national securities exchange, we have used the definition of “independence” of The NASDAQ Stock Market to make this determination. NASDAQ Listing Rule 5605(a)(2) provides that an “independent director” is a person other than an officer or employee of the company or any other individual having a relationship which, in the opinion of the Company’s Board of Directors, would interfere with the exercise of independent judgment in carrying out the responsibilities of a director. The NASDAQ listing rules provide that a director cannot be considered independent if:

·	the director is, or at any time during the past three years was, an employee of the company;

the director or a family member of the director accepted any compensation from the company in excess of $120,000 during any period of 12 consecutive months within the three years preceding the independence determination (subject to certain exclusions, including, among other things, compensation for board or board committee service);

·	a family member of the director is, or at any time during the past three years was, an executive officer of the company;

the director or a family member of the director is a partner in, controlling stockholder of, or an executive officer of an entity to which the company made, or from which the company received, payments in the current or any of the past three fiscal years that exceed 5% of the recipient’s consolidated gross revenue for that year or $200,000, whichever is greater (subject to certain exclusions);

·	the director or a family member of the director is employed as an executive officer of an entity where, at any time during the past three years, any of the executive officers of the company served on the compensation committee of such other entity; or

·	the director or a family member of the director is a current partner of the company’s outside auditor, or at any time during the past three years was a partner or employee of the company’s outside auditor, and who worked on the company’s audit.

Gregory Schwartz is not considered independent because he is an executive officer of the Company.

We do not currently have a separately designated audit, nominating or compensation committee.

Item 14. Principal Accounting Fees and Services.

Audit Fees

For the Company’s fiscal years ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, we were billed approximately $4,500 and 3,000, respectively for professional services rendered for the audit and reviews of our financial statements.

Audit Related Fees

The Company did not incur any audit related fees, other than the fees discussed in Audit Fees, above, for services related to our audit for the fiscal years ended June 30, 2011 and 2010.

Tax Fees

For the Company’s fiscal years ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, we were not billed for professional services rendered for tax compliance, tax advice, and tax planning.

All Other Fees

The Company did not incur any other fees related to services rendered by our principal accountant for the fiscal years ended June 30, 2011 and 2010.

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

Effective May 6, 2003, the Securities and Exchange Commission adopted rules that require that before our auditor is engaged by us to render any auditing or permitted non-audit related service, the engagement be:

·	approved by our audit committee; or

entered into pursuant to pre-approval policies and procedures established by the audit committee, provided the policies and procedures are detailed as to the particular service, the audit committee is informed of each service, and such policies and procedures do not include delegation of the audit committee’s responsibilities to management.

We do not have an audit committee. Our entire board of directors pre-approves all services provided by our independent auditors. The pre-approval process has just been implemented in response to the new rules. Therefore, our board of directors does not have records of what percentage of the above fees were pre-approved. However, all of the above services and fees were reviewed and approved by the entire board of directors either before or after the respective services were rendered.

PART IV

Item 15. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules.

(a) The following documents are filed as part of this report:

Financial Statements: See “Index to Consolidated Financial Statements” in Part II, Item 8 of this Report.

Exhibits: The exhibits listed in the accompanying index to exhibits are filed or incorporated by reference as part of this Report.

(b) The following are exhibits to this Report and, if incorporated by reference, we have indicated the document previously filed with the SEC in which the exhibit was included.

Certain of the agreements filed as exhibits to this Report contain representations and warranties by the parties to the agreements that have been made solely for the benefit of the parties to the agreement. These representations and warranties:

·	may have been qualified by disclosures that were made to the other parties in connection with the negotiation of the agreements, which disclosures are not necessarily reflected in the agreements;

·	may apply standards of materiality that differ from those of a reasonable investor; and

·	were made only as of specified dates contained in the agreements and are subject to subsequent developments and changed circumstances.

Accordingly, these representations and warranties may not describe the actual state of affairs as of the date that these representations and warranties were made or at any other time. Investors should not rely on them as statements of fact.

Exhibit Number		Description
3.1		Certificate of Incorporation [incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form 10 filed with the SEC on July 20, 2010 (“Form 10”)]
3.2		Bylaws [incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to the Form 10]
10.1		Description of Verbal Management Consulting Agreement Between Europa Acquisition I, Inc., and Peter Reichard [incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Form 10]
10.2		Stock Purchase Agreement by and among the Company, Peter Reichard, Peter Coker, Beige Holdings, LLC and Marlin Financial Group, Inc. effective October 1, 2010 [incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on October 7, 2010]
31.1		Certification of principal executive officer and principal financial officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Exchange Act
32.1	*	Certification of principal executive officer and principal financial officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) of the Exchange Act and Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
101.INS	+	XBRL Instance Document
101.SCH	+	XBRL Taxonomy Schema
101.CAL	+	XBRL Taxonomy Calculation Linkbase
101.DEF	+	XBRL Taxonomy Definition Linkbase
101.LAB	+	XBRL Taxonomy Label Linkbase
101.PRE	+	XBRL Taxonomy Presentation Linkbase

* Furnished herewith.

+ XBRL (eXtensible Business Reporting Language) information is furnished and not filed or a part of a registration statement or prospectus for purposes of Sections 11 or 12 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, is deemed not filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and otherwise is not subject to liability under these sections.

SIGNATURES

In accordance with Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act, the registrant caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

	EUROPA ACQUISITION I, INC.

Dated: September 28, 2011	By:	/s/ Gregory Schwartz
		Gregory Schwartz President and Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

Name	Title	Date

/s/Gregory Schwartz	President, Chief Executive Officer and Director	September 28, 2011
Gregory Schwartz

Wintahenderson International, Inc. - FORM 10-K - September 28, 2011

Attached files

Wintahenderson International, Inc. Reports