UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND
EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C.
20549
Form 10-K
|
|
|
þ
|
|
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
|
For the Fiscal Year Ended
June 30, 2011
|
OR
|
o
|
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
|
For the transition period
from to
|
Commission File Number
001-34540
UNILIFE
CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as
specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
|
|
27-1049354
|
(State or other jurisdiction
of
incorporation or organization)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
|
|
|
|
250 Cross Farm Lane, York,
Pennsylvania
|
|
17406
|
(Address of principal executive
offices)
|
|
(Zip Code)
|
Registrants
telephone number, including area code
(717) 384-3400
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the
Act:
|
|
|
Title of Each Class
|
|
Name of Each Exchange on Which Registered
|
|
Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share
|
|
The Nasdaq Stock Market, LLC
|
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the
Act:
None
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known
seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities
Act. Yes o No þ
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file
reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the
Act. Yes o No þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed
all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or
Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during
the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that
the registrant was required to file such reports), and
(2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the
past
90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted
electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any,
every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of
Regulation S-T
(§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding
12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant
was required to submit and post such
files). Yes o No o
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers
pursuant to Item 405 of
Regulation S-K
(§ 229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein,
and will not be contained, to the best of registrants
knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements
incorporated by reference in Part III of this
Form 10-K
or any amendment to this
Form 10-K. þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large
accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated
filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of
large accelerated filer, accelerated
filer and smaller reporting company in
Rule 12b-2
of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
|
Large
accelerated
filer o
|
Accelerated
filer þ
|
Non-accelerated
filer o
|
Smaller
reporting
company o
|
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
Indicated by check mark whether the registrant is a shell
company (as defined in
Rule 12b-2
of the Exchange
Act). Yes o No þ
The aggregate market value of the common equity held by
non-affiliates of the registrant as of December 31, 2010,
the last business day of the registrants most recently
completed second fiscal quarter was $310.4 million,
computed by reference to the closing sale price of the
Companys common stock. For purposes of the foregoing
calculation only, the registrant has assumed that all officers
and directors of the registrant are affiliates.
As of September 1, 2011, there were 64,058,508 shares
of registrants common stock outstanding.
DOCUMENTS
INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Portions of the registrants Definitive Proxy Statement to
be filed with the Commission pursuant to Regulation 14A in
connection with the registrants 2011 Annual Meeting of
Stockholders, to be filed subsequent to the date hereof, are
incorporated by reference into Part III of this Report.
Such Definitive Proxy Statement will be filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission not later than 120 days
after the conclusion of the registrants fiscal year ended
June 30, 2011.
UNILIFE
CORPORATION
FORM 10-K
FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2011
TABLE OF CONTENTS
2
Presentation
of Information
Unilife Corporation was incorporated in the State of Delaware on
July 2, 2009. On January 27, 2010, Unilife Medical
Solutions Limited, an Australian corporation (UMSL),
completed a redomiciliation from Australia to the State of
Delaware pursuant to which stockholders and option holders of
UMSL exchanged their interests in UMSL for equivalent interests
in Unilife Corporation, a Delaware corporation
(Unilife) and Unilife became the parent company of
UMSL and its subsidiaries. The redomiciliation was conducted by
way of schemes of arrangement under Australian law. The issuance
of Unilife common stock and stock options under the schemes of
arrangement was exempt from registration under
Section 3(a)(10) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.
The redomiciliation was approved by the Australian Federal
Court, and approved by UMSL shareholders and option holders.
In connection with the redomiciliation, holders of UMSL ordinary
shares or share options received one share of Unilife common
stock or an option to purchase one share of Unilife common
stock, for every six UMSL ordinary shares or share options,
respectively, held by such holders, unless the holder elected to
receive in lieu of Unilife common stock, Chess Depositary
Interests of Unilife, or CDIs (each representing one-sixth of
one share of Unilife common stock), in which case such holder
received one CDI for every UMSL ordinary share. All share and
per share amounts in this Annual Report on
Form 10-K
have been restated to reflect the one for six share
recapitalization effected in connection with the redomiciliation.
On February 16, 2010, Unilifes common stock began
trading on the Nasdaq Global Market under the symbol
UNIS.
References to the Company, we,
our or us include Unilife Corporation
and its consolidated subsidiaries, including UMSL, unless the
context otherwise requires. References to Unilife
are references solely to Unilife Corporation.
Trademarks,
Trade Names and Service Marks
Unilife®,
Unitract®
and
Unifill®
are registered trademarks of Unilife Corporation and its
subsidiaries.
Cautionary
Note Regarding Forward-Looking Information
This Annual Report on
Form 10-K
contains forward-looking statements. All statements that address
operating performance, events or developments that we expect or
anticipate will occur in the future are forward-looking
statements. The forward-looking statements are contained
principally in the sections entitled Business,
Risk Factors, and Managements Discussion
and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations. In some cases, you can identify
forward-looking statements by terms such as may,
will, should, could,
would, expects, plans,
anticipates, believes,
estimates, projects,
predicts, potential and similar
expressions intended to identify forward-looking statements.
These forward-looking statements are based on managements
beliefs and assumptions and on information currently available
to our management. However, you should not place undue reliance
on any such forward-looking statements because such statements
speak only as of the date when made. We do not undertake any
obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking
statements, whether as a result of new information, future
events or otherwise, except as required by law. In addition,
forward-looking statements are subject to certain risks and
uncertainties that could cause actual results, events and
developments to differ materially from our historical experience
and our present expectations or projections. These risks and
uncertainties include, but are not limited to, those described
in Item 1A. Risk Factors and elsewhere in this
Annual Report on
Form 10-K
and those described from time to time in our future reports
which we will file with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
You should read this Annual Report on
Form 10-K
and the documents that we have filed as exhibits to this Annual
Report on
Form 10-K
completely.
Currencies
Unless indicated otherwise in this Annual Report on
Form 10-K,
all references to $ or dollars refer to U.S. dollars.
References to A$ mean the lawful currency of the Commonwealth of
Australia. References to or euros are to the lawful
currency of the European Union.
3
Overview
We are a U.S. based developer and commercial supplier of a
diversified portfolio of advanced drug delivery systems. We
collaborate with pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies
seeking to optimize drug lifecycles and generate differentiation
for their brand in competitive therapeutic markets through the
use of innovative devices that can improve patient care, protect
healthcare workers and prevent disease. We have developed a
broad portfolio of drug delivery systems in direct response to
unmet market needs for macromolecule injectable drugs including
biologics.
Our
Unifill®
syringe, the worlds first and only known, commercially
available,
ready-to-fill
syringe with automatic, user-controlled safety features
integrated within the glass barrel, sits at the leading edge of
a proprietary platform of primary drug containers. The Unifill
syringe is designed to be supplied to pharmaceutical
manufacturers in a form that is ready for filling with an
injectable drug or vaccine of up to 1mL in dose volume. As a
primary drug container, the Unifill syringe has USP
Class Six compatible materials within the drug fluid path.
Following our supply of the Unifill syringe to the
pharmaceutical company, they are primarily responsible for the
filling, packaging, shipment, regulatory approval, clinical use
and marketing of the drug-device combination product. The
Unifill syringe is suitable for use by healthcare workers and by
patients that self-administer prescription medication outside of
healthcare facilities.
We have a strategic relationship with Sanofi, a large global
pharmaceutical company, pursuant to which it has paid to us
10.0 million euros under an exclusive licensing agreement
plus an additional 17.0 million euros during the
industrialization program for the Unifill syringe. Together,
these payments (equating to approximately $40 million in
total based upon currency rates at the time of payments) provide
Sanofi with the exclusive right to negotiate for the purchase of
the Unifill syringe within the main therapeutic classes of
anti-thrombotic agents, vaccines and four smaller confidential
sub-classes
until June 30, 2014.
We commenced initial production and supply of the Unifill
syringe to Sanofi and one other U.S. based pharmaceutical
company in July 2011. We are also in discussions with other
pharmaceutical companies regarding the supply of, and access to,
the Unifill syringe, within therapeutic drug classes outside of
those retained by Sanofi.
We expect that current and future customers will seek to utilize
initial units of the Unifill syringe for required compatibility
and stability studies with target injectable drugs and vaccines.
Our Unifill portfolio of
ready-to-fill
syringes with integrated safety features is now being expanded
to support the delivery of other prefilled injectable drugs and
vaccines. Our Unifill Select syringes are designed for the use
of interchangeable needles of up to
11/2
in length. They can be prefilled either with liquid stable drugs
for therapeutic classes such as vaccines where intramuscular
injections are commonly required, or with a diluent for use with
lyophilized drugs supplied in a vial for reconstitution at the
point of delivery. We have also developed and filed provisional
patent applications for the Unifill EZMix range of syringes with
multiple chambers that contain the lyophilized drug and the
diluent for reconstitution within the single delivery system.
Additional technology platforms that we have developed in
response to the unmet device needs of pharmaceutical companies
include patient self-administration systems including
auto-injectors and wearable subcutaneous pump infusion systems
for viscous, large-volume drugs, and other specialized devices
for targeted organ delivery. We also supply our Unitract 1mL
range of syringes to medical distributors for use within
healthcare facilities and by patients that self-administer
prescription medication.
These technology platforms may also facilitate the customization
of each device to address the specific pharmaceutical, molecular
and patient requirements of a target drug supplied in either a
liquid stable form or lyophilized for reconstitution. As our
devices can form an integral part of the drug-device combination
product that is submitted to regulatory agencies for approval,
our collaboration with pharmaceutical companies can begin during
the early clinical development of a pipeline drug and
potentially span its entire commercial lifecycle.
4
Our goal is to enter into commercial supply contracts with
pharmaceutical companies, as well as to enter into development
agreements under which a pharmaceutical company may fund the
development or customization of a Unilife device for use with
its drugs entering into scheduled clinical trials. Programs to
develop products suitable for use in scheduled clinical trials
are now ongoing with one pharmaceutical company.
We design and manufacture our devices out of a
state-of-the-art
global headquarters and production facility located in York,
Pennsylvania. We opened the 165,000 square foot facility in
December 2010 following a $32 million one-year construction
program. The facility includes a 100,000 square foot
production center that contains eleven cleanrooms, a product
development center, quality labs, machine shops and a fully
segregated warehouse. Activities undertaken at the site include
device design, rapid prototyping, pilot and commercial
production, bio-analytical testing, packaging, quality assurance
and supply chain. All activities are guided by business systems,
such as SAP ERP, that complement those of pharmaceutical
companies. Our Quality Management System is fully certified to
ISO 13485 and operates in compliance with
21 CRF 210/211 for pharmaceuticals and
21 CFR 820 for medical devices.
Market
Opportunity
The
Pharmaceutical Market for Pre-Filled Syringes
A
ready-to-fill
or prefilled syringe serves as a primary drug container for an
injectable drug or vaccine.
Prefilled syringes have a number of advantages over conventional
plastic syringes that typically draw medication from vials or
ampoules at the time of administration. First, prefilled
syringes help pharmaceutical companies improve manufacturing
efficiencies through the elimination of drug wastage commonly
associated with the overfilling of multi-use vials. Second,
healthcare workers often prefer prefilled syringes because they
can facilitate a relatively fast, accurate and convenient
administration of a drug. Furthermore, a pre-measured dose of an
injectable drug in a prefilled syringe can help reduce the risk
of dosing errors. Finally, the relative
ease-of-use
and accuracy of prefilled syringes can also make them suitable
for patient self-administration of many types of prescription
medication.
Prefilled syringes are supplied to a pharmaceutical company
ready for filling with an injectable drug or
vaccine, before it is packaged and shipped for administration by
either healthcare workers or by patients that self-administer
prescription medication outside of healthcare facilities.
Prefilled syringes are made of glass, with USP compliant
materials within the fluid path to support the compatibility and
stability of the target drug within the device for an average
period of at least two years. The majority of prefilled syringes
are used with drugs supplied in a liquid stable dose format of
up to 1mL in volume, and targeted for administration either by
subcutaneous or intramuscular injection. Some lyophilized drugs
requiring reconstitution at the point of delivery are also
supplied in a dual-chamber prefilled syringe where one container
is filled with a drug and another chamber with diluent.
We are aware of more than 50 drugs and vaccines that are
currently available in a prefilled syringe format from more than
20 pharmaceutical companies, and believe that a number of
pipeline drugs are likely to be supplied in this format in the
future. Greystone Associates, a medical and health care
technology consulting firm, has estimated that approximately
2.54 billion prefilled syringes were used globally in 2010,
and that this number will increase significantly in the coming
years. Another market research firm, MarketsandMarkets,
estimates that the market for prefilled syringes was valued at
$2.55 billion in 2010, and is projected to increase to
$4.806 billion in 2015, representing a compound average
growth rate of 13.5%.
Drugs targeted for use across more than a dozen therapeutic
classes that are currently supplied in a prefilled syringe
format include anti-coagulants to prevent and treat thrombosis,
anti-inflammatories to treat rheumatoid arthritis,
anti-infectives to treat hepatitis B and C, hematological drugs
to stimulate production of red or white blood cells to treat
anemia or fight infection, and vaccines which seek to prevent a
range of diseases. We expect that prefilled syringes will also
be increasingly used in the coming years as a drug delivery
device for other therapeutic drug classes including obstetrics,
oncology, osteoporosis and human growth hormone treatment.
5
Increased
Focus on Prevention of Needlestick Injuries
The World Health Organization estimates that 1.3 million
people die each year as a result of unsafe injection practices,
which can include syringe re-use and needlestick injuries.
Unsafe injection practices result in the transmission of a
number of blood-borne diseases such as HIV/AIDS and
hepatitis C. The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention estimates that 385,000 needlestick and other
sharps-related injuries are sustained by
U.S. hospital-based healthcare personnel each year. The
U.S. Occupational Safety and Health Administration, or
OSHA, estimates that when other secondary healthcare settings
are also taken into account, there are as many as 800,000
needlestick injuries to U.S. healthcare workers each year.
To help minimize the transmission of blood-borne pathogens
caused by unsafe injection practices, many international
healthcare and pharmaceutical markets are transitioning to the
mandatory use of safety syringes.
In many sophisticated healthcare markets, governments are
focused on the mandatory use of safety devices within healthcare
facilities to protect healthcare workers from the risk of
acquiring blood-borne pathogens via needlestick injuries. The
United States was the first nation to mandate the use of safety
syringes and other safety-engineered medical devices within
healthcare facilities, with the adoption of the Federal
Needlestick Prevention Act in 2000, or FNSPA, and the subsequent
revision to the Bloodborne Pathogens Standard (BPS).
The European Union has also introduced a directive in March 2010
requiring member countries to introduce laws within three years
requiring the use of needlestick prevention products within
healthcare facilities. Other countries such as Canada and
Australia have also taken steps to encourage the use of safety
syringes. As a result of this existing and proposed legislation,
safety syringes are now commonly used within the healthcare
facilities in a number of countries.
The United States represents the largest and most mature market
for safety syringes, with a substantial majority of hypodermic
syringes and needles used within acute-care facilities featuring
some type of needlestick prevention device. Notwithstanding the
increased use of safety syringes, we believe that current safety
syringe technologies are in several respects inadequate to fully
protect healthcare workers from infection risk caused by
needlestick injuries or other potential transmission modes.
First, most products currently available require operators to
manually slide an external plastic guard or sheath over the
needle after use, or retract the needle into the barrel at a
rapid, uncontrolled rate. Second, healthcare workers may choose
to remove or not activate the safety feature of some types of
safety syringe products. Moreover, activation of the needle
retraction mechanism in the open air for some retractable
syringes, rather than inside the body of the patient, may create
the potential risk of infection via needlestick injuries or
aerosol (splatter).
OSHA differentiates safety features in two primary ways. First,
it differentiates passive safety features which
remain in effect before, during and after use from
active devices which require the worker to activate
the safety mechanism. Second, OSHA regulations state that
products with an integrated safety design that is an
integral part of the device and cannot be removed are
usually preferred to those with an accessory safety device with
safety features that are external and
dependent on employee compliance. We believe the
majority of safety syringe products used in U.S. healthcare
facilities incorporate active safety features which are not
fully integrated within the barrel of the syringe.
We are not aware of any prefilled syringe with passive safety
features that are integrated within the glass barrel. To improve
compliance with legislation such as the FNSPA, a number of
pharmaceutical companies attach ancillary safety products onto
standard prefilled syringes following dose filling and prior to
packaging. We estimate that approximately half of the approved
drugs currently available in a prefilled syringe format are
supplied by the pharmaceutical manufacturer with some type of
ancillary safety device. The majority of these ancillary safety
products slide an external plastic sheath or guard over the
needle once the injection has been completed.
It is costly for pharmaceutical companies to purchase these
ancillary safety products and to operate the automated assembly
systems required to attach them onto a standard prefilled
syringe. The relatively large size of prefilled syringes
supplied with an ancillary safety device can also significantly
increase the shipping and packaging costs of pharmaceutical
companies. Furthermore, some of these prefilled syringes
supplied with an ancillary safety device require the removal of
the device from the body prior to activation of the safety
mechanism, creating the risk of infection via needlestick injury
or aerosol (splatter). Thus, we believe that there is a
significant
6
market opportunity for the Unifill syringe that has passive and
integrated safety features and is compatible with pharmaceutical
companies drug filling systems.
We also believe there are significant market opportunities for
the use of conventional and prefilled safety syringes outside of
mainstream healthcare facilities. In addition to insulin, a
range of other injectable drugs designed for the prevention
and/or
treatment of chronic or debilitating conditions such as
arthritis, multiple sclerosis and osteoporosis and thrombosis
are now available for self-administration. We believe the
popularity of safety syringes among patients who self-administer
prescription medication may increase due to their capacity to
prevent needlestick injuries to family members and encourage
safe, convenient disposal. When purchased with a prescription, a
number of insurance providers in the U.S. now cover safety
insulin syringes under the same tier level for reimbursement as
standard insulin syringes.
Increasing
Pharmaceutical Investment in Large-Molecule Drugs
The composition of clinical development pipelines is being
increasingly dominated by large-molecule injectable drugs, such
as biologics, with specific formulation and delivery
requirements. Biological drugs are created by biologic
processes, rather than being chemically synthesized. They are
used in the treatment of many acute and chronic diseases such as
cancer, rheumatoid arthritis, diabetes, multiple sclerosis and
growth hormone deficiency. The market for biologics has grown
from $60.3 billion in 2004 to $109.8 billion in 2010.
The injectable drug delivery market is being increasingly driven
by the increasing development and marketing of large-molecule
drugs and vaccines such as biologics by a number of top tier
pharmaceutical companies. According to MarketsandMarkets, the
biologics market is expected to grow from $109.8 billion in
2010 to $180.9 billion in 2015, representing a compound
annual growth rate of 10.5%. Based on available information, we
believe that there are more than a thousand large-molecule drugs
such as biologics now in the clinical and pre-clinical
development pipeline. Biologics are expected to account for
17.5% of total projected global drug sales in 2015.
Due to the protein based structure of biologics, most are
fragile in nature. As a result, the vast majority-of-biological
drugs is injected into the body and supplied in either a liquid
stable or lyophilized form for reconstitution. Due to the
specific molecular, formulation and patient requirements of
large-molecule drugs including biologics, pharmaceutical
companies will often seek to enter into collaborative
partnerships with device manufacturers to develop effective
drug- device combination products that can enable and enhance
their clinical use and commercialization.
In addition to the commercial supply of our devices for approved
drugs, we believe there are significant opportunities for us to
establish collaborative relationships with pharmaceutical
companies whereby we can develop delivery devices in parallel
with the clinical development of a target pipeline biological
drug. Based upon legal reviews of FDA guidance, we believe that
the development of devices that are designed or customized to
address the specific requirements of the target molecule can
generate unique claims for the drug-device combination product
that may make it non-substitutable for biosimilar competitors.
We are further aware of a number of biologics that are expected
to lose patent protection between 2011 and 2015, which may
create opportunities for us to collaborate with manufacturers of
biologic or biosimilar drugs to develop innovative or
differentiated devices that can potentially extend product
lifecycles within increasingly competitive therapeutic drug
classes.
Patient-Self-Administration
of Injectable Drugs
Increased prevalence of chronic and debilitating diseases such
as diabetes, rheumatoid arthritis, multiple sclerosis and
cancer, along with increased life expectancies, has created
increasing demand for ways to administer treatment outside of
healthcare facilities. The self-administration of injectable
medication by patients offers several significant benefits
including reduced financial and operational constraints on
healthcare facilities and improvements in patient care and
overall quality of life. Self-injection devices such as
prefilled syringes, auto-injectors, subcutaneous infusion
systems and pens are among the device categories that enhance
and enable the safe, simple and convenient administration of
prescription medications. MarketsandMarkets projects the patient
self-injection sector to increase to $1.2 billion by 2015.
Drug delivery devices that are intuitive to use and have minimal
steps of use can increase the overall value of the drug-device
combination product. In particular, we believe such devices can
help to enhance levels of patient
7
acceptance to improve adherence to therapy compliance. Such
device-related factors can play a significant role in the
selection of which drug a physician will prescribe for treatment
and its reimbursement. As a result, innovative, patient-friendly
devices can help to generate higher numbers of units sold, raise
the average selling price per dose, increase levels of market
share and generate brand differentiation within competitive
therapeutic classes.
Our
Solutions
We have developed a diversified and highly innovative portfolio
of advanced drug delivery systems in direct response to the
unmet needs of pharmaceutical companies, healthcare workers and
patients. We consider our devices to be differentiated by their
market-driven design and capacity to be developed to address the
specific molecular, formulation, clinical, regulatory, patient
and marketing requirements of a target drug. By supporting
pharmaceutical companies during the clinical development and
commercial lifecycles of their drugs, our devices are designed
to improve patient care, optimize product lifecycles and
generate powerful brand differentiation within competitive
therapeutic classes.
Proprietary
Technology Platforms
Our broad platform of primary drug containers and other device
technologies has been designed to support the administration of
injectable drugs and vaccines, including biologics, supplied in
a liquid stable or lyophilized form for reconstitution, across a
wide range of therapeutic classes. In our opinion, this
technology platform of prefilled syringes,
patient-self-injection systems and novel target organ delivery
systems represents one of the most diversified and
customer-focused device portfolios on the market for use with
drugs targeted for administration via common routes such as
subcutaneous and intramuscular injection. Our technology
platforms cover the following device categories:
Unifill:
Prefilled Syringes (Primary Drug Containers) with Integrated
Safety Features
We have developed a full platform of Unifill
ready-to-fill
(prefilled) syringes that are designed for use with a broad
range of liquid stable and lyophilized drugs and vaccines that
are targeted for use in a prefilled format. All Unifill products
within this proprietary platform utilize our unique automatic
retraction safety mechanism enabling operators to control the
speed of needle withdrawal directly from the body into the
barrel of the syringe. This combination of automatic,
operator-controlled needle retraction features fully integrated
within the barrel is designed to minimize the risk of infection
via potential transmission modes including needlestick injuries,
device reuse or aersolization (splatter). All components within
the fluid path feature USP-compliant materials, with the devices
designed to be supplied to customers for integration into their
existing fill-finish systems.
The Unifill syringe (see below) sits at the leading edge of this
proprietary platform. These devices are manufactured at our
FDA-registered facility in York, PA, and available for supply to
pharmaceutical companies. Other Unifill
ready-to-fill
syringes we have developed include primary and multi-container
systems featuring either staked (fixed) or interchangeable
needles.
Unifill Select syringes feature a primary drug container that
can either be utilized as a ready-for injection prefilled
delivery system for liquid stable drugs, or with a diluent for
use with lyophilized drugs supplied in a vial format for
reconstitution at the point of delivery. Interchangeable needles
of up to 1.5 inches in length can be attached onto Unifill
Select products. All Unifill syringes can be customized to
address the specific customer, molecular component and patient
requirements of a target drug.
Clinical
(Hypodermic) Syringes
We have developed a proprietary range of Unitract safety
syringes for use with liquid stable drugs supplied in a vial or
ampoule are targeted for common administration routes including
subcutaneous and intramuscular injection. All Unitract syringes
feature a unique combination of automatic and fully integrated
safety features that help to enable intuitive use and convenient
disposal by either healthcare workers or patients that
self-administer prescription medication. An audible, tactile
click signals the automatic (passive) activation of the needle
retraction mechanism upon the full injection of the dose.
Operators can control the speed at which the needle is withdrawn
8
directly from the body into the barrel of the syringe by
relieving thumb or finger pressure on the plunger. The plunger
is then locked to prevent needle re-exposure, product tampering
or device reuse.
At the leading edge of this platform is the Unitract range of
1mL safety syringes. Product variants including the Unitract
Insulin and Tuberculin syringes are approved and available for
use within a number of international markets including the U.S.,
Canada and the European Union. These devices are manufactured at
our FDA-registered facility in York, PA.
We have also developed an extended range of Unitract syringes
from 3mL in size designed for the intramuscular injection of
drugs and vaccines that require the attachment of needles up to
1.5 inches in length
Self-Injection
Systems
Auto-Injectors
Our Unifill Auto-Injector platform is designed for the
self-administration of injectable drugs by patients outside of
healthcare facilities. Designed for use with the Unifill
ready-to-fill
syringes, Unifill Auto-Injectors have been developed in
single-use disposable and re-usable configurations, and can be
customized to support a range of drug viscosities and patient
dexterity requirements.
Due to the integrated safety features of the Unifill syringe,
Unifill Auto-Injectors are highly compact in size compared to
comparable devices to provide easier portability, compact
handling and convenient disposal. We believe that because of its
utilization with the Unifill syringe, Unifill Auto-Injectors
also offer the first true
end-of-dose
indicator for the patient self-administration of injectable
drugs in an auto-injector format. An audible, tactile click
signals the injection of the full dose and the automatic
activation of the safety mechanism in the Unifill syringe, which
retracts the needle directly from the body into the cylinder.
This true
end-of-dose
indicator ensures the operator is able to intuitively and
accurately deliver the full volume of prescribed medication to
optimize therapy compliance.
Unifill Auto-Injectors also utilize fewer components than many
comparable devices over an equivalent standard prefilled syringe
due to its provision with the Unifill syringe.
Auto-Infusors
We have developed and filed a patent application for what we
consider to be a unique technology platform of single-use
wearable subcutaneous infusion pump systems enabling patients to
self-administer large-molecule injectable drugs between 3mL and
10mL in volume. Unifill Auto-Infusors are designed to serve as a
patient-centric delivery system for a number of emerging
therapies including biologics that require higher dose volumes,
less frequent dosing regimens, and the formulation of more
complex injectable molecules. Our range of Auto-Infusors is
designed to be worn by the patient for preset infusion times
that can span between minutes and hours in duration based upon
the requirements of the pharmaceutical company. After the
application of the device on or near the injection site and the
pushing of a button by the patient, the delivery of the
medication commences. Upon the completion of dose delivery, the
patient can remove the system from the body for convenient
disposal.
Auto-Infusors consist of a primary drug container, the standard
fluid path and a drive mechanism that are all modular in design
to enable customization to address the specific molecular,
viscosity and patient requirements of the target drug. For
clinical trial use, our Auto-Infusors can be filled at time of
use to eliminate the need for drug compatibility studies. We
expect the device will be used in clinical drug trials by
pharmaceutical companies scheduled to occur during the 2012
calendar year.
Novel
Devices for Targeted Organ Delivery
We have started working with pharmaceutical companies to develop
specialized drug delivery systems to administer biologics and
other macro-molecule drugs that require high-precision
administration to target organs of the human body. For these
projects, this collaboration with the pharmaceutical company can
occurs early in the clinical development phase. These close
relationships that we build with pharmaceutical companies can
help to
9
create unique drug-device combination products that can contain
and administer the dose to the target organ with high-precision
and reliability.
By addressing the specific device innovation needs in parallel
with the development of the target pipeline drug, the
specialized organ delivery systems that we develop can help to
support successful clinical trial outcomes and the filing of
regulatory applications with strong claims for the combination
product. As a result, our proprietary organ delivery systems may
help to generate powerful brand differentiation for the target
drug, to create a competitive advantage of over drugs offered by
other manufacturers of branded drugs or biosimilar or generic
competitors.
Business
Strategy
Our goal is to become established as a preferred partner to
pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies in the development
and commercial supply of innovative, differentiated delivery
systems for the administration of injectable drugs and vaccines.
In the near-term, our primary focus is to supply our lead
product, the Unifill syringe to pharmaceutical companies in
order for them to commence stability and compatibility studies
with target drugs.
Over the medium to long-term, we will seek to commercialize a
diversified portfolio of advanced drug delivery systems that can
help to enable the clinical development and, or enhance the
commercial lifecycles of branded, biosimilar and generic drugs
across a multitude of therapeutic drug classes. Unlike
conventional commodity products marketed by incumbent device
manufacturers, it is our goal to develop highly differentiated
devices that can be customized to address the specific molecular
and patient requirements of a drug and its target patient.
We do not intend to enter any market sectors with devices that
have equivalent features as conventional products. Our focus is
on innovative, high-value devices that will have unique
value-adding features over equivalent products. We can also
custom-design our devices, where required, to meet specific
needs of pharmaceutical companies. Where our proprietary devices
need to be developed or customized to meet the specific
requirements of a target drug, we will typically enter into a
development program with a pharmaceutical company under which
they will provide funding before, subject to regulatory
approval, entering into long-term contracts for commercial
supply. Through this strategy, we hope to develop and
commercially supply a diverse range of injectable drug delivery
systems that can help to enhance patient care, improve therapy
compliance, protect healthcare workers, prevent disease, reduce
healthcare costs and generate powerful brand differentiation for
brand-name, generic or biosimilar drugs marketed within
competitive therapeutic classes.
We believe we are well positioned to achieve this goal due to a
combination of factors that include:
|
|
|
|
|
Proprietary Safety Syringe Technology: We have
provisional or issued patents for an extensive portfolio of
safety syringe technologies that can be applied for use with
virtually all liquid-stable or lyophilized drugs and vaccines
that are supplied in a vial, ampoule or prefilled format. We are
not aware of any other technology platform that incorporates the
following safety features that are fully integrated within the
barrel of the syringe:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Automatic activation of the safety mechanism upon full dose
delivery to virtually eliminate the risk of needlestick injuries;
|
|
|
|
The ability for operators to control the speed of needle
retraction directly from the body into the barrel to minimize
the risk of aerosol (splatter); and
|
|
|
|
The automatic locking of the plunger inside the barrel to
prevent needle re-exposure, device reuse or product tampering.
|
|
|
|
Patents for our safety syringe technology extend from 2018 to
2030 for core features of our Unifill range of prefilled
syringes across multiple jurisdictions including the United
States, Europe, Canada, Japan, China and Australia.
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Unifill Syringe: The Unifill syringe is
the worlds first commercially available and only known,
prefilled syringe with safety features that are fully integrated
within the glass barrel. Designed to serve as a primary drug
container for a range of prefilled drugs and vaccines, the
Unifill syringe features USP compliant materials in the fluid
path to support drug compatibility and is supplied for
integration into fill-
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
finish lines currently used with conventional prefilled
syringes. Unlike ancillary safety devices now utilized by
pharmaceutical companies with their prefilled drugs to comply
with needlestick prevention laws, the Unifill syringe can
minimize the packaging, transport and storage costs of a
pharmaceutical company. Sharing similar steps of use to
equivalent standard prefilled syringes, the Unifill syringe is
suitable for use either by healthcare workers or by patients
that self-administer prescription medication.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diversified Portfolio of Advanced Drug Delivery Systems:
The successful development and commercialization of the
Unifill syringe has given us the operational capabilities,
expertise and industry credibility to expand our research and
development activities into a number of other high-value drug
delivery sectors where we have identified unmet market needs for
device innovation. In direct response to these unmet needs, we
have developed a broad and differentiated portfolio of primary
drug containers with integrated safety features, patient
self-injection systems and novel organ delivery devices.
|
|
|
|
Full Development and Commercial Supply
Partner: We have established our operational
capabilities to serve the device innovation requirements of
pharmaceutical companies from the clinical development phase of
pipeline drugs and then throughout their commercial lifecycles.
|
Our facilities in York, Pennsylvania have been designed to
function as an integrated center for device innovation, pilot
and commercial production and quality assurance. Activities
undertaken at the site include device design, rapid prototyping,
pilot and commercial production, bio-analytical testing,
packaging, quality assurance and supply chain. All activities at
Unilife are guided by advanced business systems, such as SAP
ERP, that complement those of pharmaceutical companies. Our
Quality Management System is fully certified to ISO 13485, and
in compliance with 21 CRF 210/211 for pharmaceuticals and 21 CFR
820 for medical devices.
Our
Products
Unifill
Syringe
The Unifill
ready-to-fill
syringe is the worlds first and only prefilled syringe
with automatic safety features fully integrated within the glass
barrel. Supplied and designed for integration into fill-finish
systems currently used for equivalent conventional prefilled
syringes, the Unifill syringe can streamline drug production
systems and significantly reduce transport, packaging and
storage costs associated with the attachment of ancillary safety
products. The Unifill syringe has USP compliant materials within
the drug fluid path that are sourced from established
pharmaceutical suppliers.
The Unifill syringe is designed for safe, simple and convenient
use by either healthcare workers or patients that
self-administer prescription medication. Upon the injection of
the full dose, an automatic safety mechanism is activated,
whereby operators can control the speed of needle retraction
directly from the body into the barrel of the syringe. The
combination of automatic, operator-controlled retraction
features within the Unifill syringe can helps to virtually
eliminate the risk of infection from needlestick injuries or
other potential transmission modes such as aersolization
(splatter). The plunger is then automatically locked to prevent
the re-use of the device, circumvent product tampering, and
encourage its convenient and compact disposal. The Unifill
syringe is now being produced at our production facilities in
York, Pennsylvania.
The Unifill syringe is a primary drug container with automatic
safety features that are fully integrated within the glass
barrel. We believe it is the only
ready-to-fill,
or prefilled, syringe with such integrated safety features.
Currently, many pharmaceutical companies marketing standard
(non-safety) prefilled syringes into markets requiring mandatory
compliance with needlestick prevention laws have two options.
They can either supply the prefilled syringe without a needle
into the market, whereby it becomes the responsibility of the
healthcare facility to comply with legislation. More commonly,
the pharmaceutical company will attach an ancillary safety
product over the prefilled syringe before it is packaged and
shipped for use. The Unifill syringe can eliminate the purchase
of ancillary safety products and their associated cost to
attachment it onto a standard prefilled syringe. The Unifill
syringe is also similar in size to an equivalent prefilled
syringe and significantly smaller than those with an attached
ancillary safety product thereby reducing packaging and
transportation costs and storage volumes.
As a primary container, all components within the fluid path
utilize materials that are USP compliant and can be sourced from
established pharmaceutical suppliers. The handling and
administration of the Unifill syringe is the
11
same as injections undertaken with an ordinary prefilled
syringe. Upon the delivery of a full dose using the Unifill, a
passive retraction mechanism is activated, whereupon operators
may control the speed of needle withdrawal directly from the
body into the barrel of the syringe to virtually eliminate the
risk of needlestick injury or aerosol (splatter). The plunger is
then automatically disabled to prevent needle re-exposure, and
to facilitate compact, convenient disposal.
The Unifill syringe has been designed in a staked (fixed) needle
format for use with therapeutic drugs which are primarily
administered via subcutaneous injection and targeted for use
either by healthcare workers or patients that self-administer
prescription medication outside of healthcare facilities.
The compact size, intuitive use, functionality and automatic
safety features of the Unifill syringe compared to other
prefilled syringes, including those supplied with an ancillary
safety product, may also help pharmaceutical companies optimize
product lifecycles, increase levels of market differentiation in
competitive therapeutic areas, and expand the marketability of
some drugs for convenient self-administration by patients
outside of the healthcare setting.
We intend to file a Type III Drug Master File for the
product with relevant regulatory authorities such as the FDA. It
is the ultimate responsibility of the pharmaceutical company to
obtain final approval of the combination drug-delivery device.
Unitract
1mL Syringes
The Unitract 1mL range of safety syringes is primarily designed
for the subcutaneous injection of drugs within healthcare
facilities and by patients who self-administer prescription
medication such as insulin. In addition to insulin and
tuberculin, or TB, variants, the Unitract 1mL range also
includes the Unitract Safe Syringe which is custom-designed for
use by governments that utilize harm reduction (needle exchange)
programs to prevent the reuse, sharing and unsafe disposal
practices of Injecting Drug Users (IDUs). Unlike the Unifill
ready-to-fill
syringe, the Unitract 1mL syringes require healthcare workers or
patients to draw up the dose from a vial or ampoule immediately
prior to the injection.
We have received regulatory certification for the marketing and
sale of various Unitract 1mL syringe products in the United
States, Australia and Canada and have received CE Mark approval
in the European Union.
Pipeline
Products
We have also developed additional pipeline products which we
intend to commercialize in the future, either independently or
in collaboration with pharmaceutical and biotechnology
companies. These pipeline products include:
Unifill
Select
The Unifill Select range of
ready-to-fill
syringes combines the benefits of automatic, fully integrated
safety features with the ability to attach interchangeable
needles of up to 1 and 1/2 inches in length. Unifill Select
syringes facilitate the use of injectable drugs and vaccines
between 0.2 and 1.5mL in volume that are supplied in either a
liquid stable form or lyophilized for reconstitution. Unifill
Select delivery systems are designed to be supplied for
integration into fill-finish systems used for equivalent
conventional 1mL standard, 1mL long or larger prefilled
syringes. As primary drug containers with USP class 6
compliant materials within the drug fluid path, Unifill Select
products are similar in size to equivalent prefilled syringes.
They can be supplied
ready-for-injection
in a kit format with one or more needles for intuitive and
convenient administration either directly into the patient or
into an IV port.
The Unifill Select can either be pre-filled with a liquid stable
drug or with a diluent for the reconstitution of lyophilized
drugs supplied in a vial. In a liquid stable format, the Unifill
Select may be selected for use with drugs and vaccines where it
is recommended that the healthcare worker select the length and
gauge of a needle based upon the age or size of the patient and
other specific delivery requirements of the drug. Vaccines are
one common therapeutic class where prefilled syringes are
commonly supplied with attachable needles, to facilitate their
intramuscular injection to the patient. In addition to its
targeted use with drugs supplied in a liquid stable format, the
12
Unifill Select can also be prefilled with a diluent and packaged
with a vial adaptor for use with lyophilized drugs requiring
reconstitution. As a unique delivery system for liquid stable
drugs targeted for intramuscular injection, or other lyophilized
drugs, Unifill Select syringes are ideally positioned to
generate brand differentiation for drugs marketed within target
competitive therapeutic classes to optimize product lifecycles.
Unifill
EZMix
Unifill EZMix syringes have been developed in direct response to
the unmet needs of pharmaceutical companies seeking an
innovative and convenient delivery system for the reconstitution
and administration of lyophilized drugs and vaccines. Unifill
EZmix syringes feature two or more primary drug containers
within a single delivery system to store a combination of liquid
stable or lyophilized drugs along with up to 1mL of diluent for
reconstitution.
In addition to being the worlds first and only known dual
or multi-chamber prefilled syringes with automatic (passive)
safety features fully integrated within the delivery system, the
Unifill EZMix syringe offers minimal steps of use for healthcare
workers and patients alike. The end-user simply advances the
plunger to mix the lyophilized powder with the diluent, before
swirling the device to complete reconstitution. An audible,
tactile click signals the injection of the full dose and the
activation of a passive safety system that allows operators to
control the speed of needle retraction directly from the body
into the barrel. The Unifill EZMix syringe has been designed for
development in either a fixed (staked) needle for drugs
indicated for subcutaneous injections, or with attachable
needles of up to 1 and 1/2 inches in length.
Unifill
Auto-Injectors
The Unifill range of auto-injectors has been designed for the
accurate, intuitive and convenient administration of injectable
drugs by patients outside of healthcare facilities. Developed
for use in conjunction with Unifill prefilled syringes, Unifill
Auto-Injectors are highly compact in size, and enable patients
to inject a measured dose of medication with the simple push of
a button. Unlike conventional auto-injector technologies that
are used with standard prefilled syringes, we believe the
incorporation of the Unifill syringe with its integrated safety
features gives Unifill Auto-Injectors several significant market
advantages including a relatively small diameter and a true
end-of-dose
indicator.
The Unifill Auto-Injector platform has been designed to
accommodate devices targeted for use in either single-use
disposable or re-usable configurations for use across a wide
spectrum of therapeutic drug classes. The devices can be
custom-designed to support a range of drug viscosities and
patient dexterity requirements. With the increasing
standardization of many injectable drugs across a number of
therapeutic classes in both a stand-alone prefilled syringe
format and supplied with an auto-injector, the combination of
the Unifill syringe and a compact, accurate auto-injector under
one
best-in-class
technology platform can streamline the pathway to commercial
launch and generate powerful brand differentiation during the
product lifecycle.
We believe that because of its utilization with the Unifill
syringe, Unifill Auto-Injectors also offer the first true
end-of-dose indicator for the patient self-administration of
injectable drugs in an auto-injector format. An audible, tactile
click signals the injection of the full dose and the automatic
activation of the safety mechanism in the Unifill syringe, which
retracts the needle directly from the body into the cylinder.
This true end-of-dose indicator ensures the operator is able to
intuitively and accurately deliver the full volume of prescribed
medication to optimize therapy compliance. Unifill
Auto-Injectors also utilize fewer components than many
comparable devices over an equivalent standard prefilled syringe
due to its provision with the Unifill syringe.
Auto-Infusors
We have developed our proprietary range of single-use,
disposable subcutaneous infusion systems for the patient
self-injection of drugs between 3mL and 10mL in volume. Our
Auto-Infusors are designed to serve as a wearable delivery
system for a number of emerging therapies that require large
dose volumes, less frequent dosing regimens, and the formulation
of more complex injectable molecules. Our Auto-Infusors can be
readily attached and conveniently worn by the patient for
pre-set infusion times that may span either minutes or hours in
duration
13
depending upon the requirements of the target drug. After the
application of the device onto the injection site and the
pushing of a button by the patient, the measured delivery of the
medication occurs over a designated period of time.
Our Auto-Infusors consist of a primary drug container, the
standard fluid path and a drive mechanism that are all modular
in design to enable customization to address the specific
molecular, viscosity and patient requirements of the target
drug. Upon administration of the full dose, the patient can
conveniently dispose of the device. For clinical trial purposes,
the AutoInfuser can either be filled at the time of use for the
convenience of pharmaceutical companies, or supplied in a
prefilled format.
Unitract
Clinical Range
In addition to the commercially available Unitract 1mL syringes,
we have developed other hypodermic variants with barrel sizes of
3mL or larger for use with drugs and vaccines supplied in a vial
or ampoule and targeted for intramuscular injection. The
technology platform behind the Unitract Clinical Range can be
used with either a fixed (staked) needle configuration or with
attachable needles up to
1 and 1/2 inches
in length. A range of attachable needle configurations has been
developed, including one Unitract variant suitable for use with
standard luer slip or luer lock cannulas (needles).
As with all Unitract 1mL or Unifill prefilled syringes, the
Unitract Clinical Range to be available in 3mL barrel sizes or
larger will include automatic and fully integrated safety
features. An audible-tactile click will signal the automatic
activation of the safety mechanism and the delivery of the full
dose. Operators can control the speed at which the needle is
withdrawn directly from the body into the barrel of the syringe
by relieving thumb or finger pressure on the plunger. Upon the
full retraction of the needle into the barrel, the plunger is
locked in place to enable convenient disposal and to prevent
syringe reuse, product tampering or needle re-exposure.
Novel
Device for Targeted Organ Delivery
Unilife has also developed its first novel, specialized device
for the administration of a drug to a target organ. Unilife is
collaborating with a pharmaceutical company to develop this
device for use with a target drug scheduled to enter clinical
trials during the 2012 fiscal year. Unilife may also develop
other novel devices for targeted organ delivery in conjunction
with pharmaceutical companies.
Commercial
Relationships
Sanofi
We started to collaborate with Sanofi in 2003 for the
development of the Unifill syringe as a next-generation drug
delivery safety device. Sanofi is a large, global pharmaceutical
company, whose products span multiple therapeutic areas,
including cardiovascular diseases, thrombosis, oncology,
metabolic diseases, internal medicine and vaccines. We believe
that Sanofi is currently the worlds largest purchaser of
prefilled syringes.
We have signed an exclusive licensing agreement with Sanofi.
Under the exclusive licensing agreement, we have granted Sanofi
an exclusive license to certain of our intellectual property in
order and solely to develop, in collaboration with us, the
Unifill syringe for use in and sale to the prefilled syringe
market within those therapeutic areas agreed upon between us,
and a non-exclusive license outside those therapeutic areas that
are exclusive to Sanofi or after the expiration of the exclusive
license with Sanofi.
We and Sanofi have agreed on a list of therapeutic drug classes
that are exclusive to Sanofi. These areas include the full
therapeutic classes of antithrombotic agents and vaccines and an
additional four smaller subgroups that fall within other
therapeutic classes that we believe represent new market
opportunities in the pharmaceutical use of prefilled syringes.
Sanofi will retain the exclusive right to negotiate to purchase
the product within these designated therapeutic drug classes
until June 30, 2014, subject to the extension described
below.
Pursuant to the exclusive licensing agreement, Sanofi paid to us
a 10.0 million euro upfront one-time fee in 2008. The
exclusive license granted thereunder has an initial term
expiring on June 30, 2014. If, during the term of the
exclusive license, Sanofi has purchased the Unifill syringe for
use with a particular drug product, Sanofi will receive a
ten-year extension of the term of the exclusive license within
the therapeutic sub-class in which that drug is
14
marketed. The extension will be reduced to five years if Sanofi
does not sell a minimum of 20 million units of the product
in any of the first five years of such ten-year extension period.
Under the exclusive licensing agreement, we are not precluded
from using certain of our intellectual property to develop,
license and sell any products in any market other than the
ready-to-fill
syringe market, or from entering into licensing or other
business arrangements with other pharmaceutical companies for
the
ready-to-fill
syringe market outside those therapeutic areas that are
exclusive to Sanofi, or after the expiration of the exclusive
license with Sanofi. If we grant a license to a third party in
respect of the
ready-to-fill
syringe market, then we are required to pay Sanofi 70% of any
access, license or other upfront fee received from such third
party for access to purchase the products until our payments to
Sanofi have totaled 10.0 million euros, following which we
are required to pay 30% of such fees we receive through the end
of the initial exclusivity period. We are also required to pay
Sanofi an annual royalty payment of 5% of the revenue generated
from any sale of the Unifill syringe to third parties, up to a
maximum amount of 17.0 million euros in such royalty
payments.
On June 30, 2009, we signed an industrialization agreement
with Sanofi. The industrialization agreement sets forth the
terms for the collaboration between the parties to design,
develop, scale up and industrialize the Unifill syringe,
including the timetable and milestones for the industrialization
program. Under the industrialization agreement, Sanofi agreed to
make payments of 17.0 million euros to us based on
milestones we achieved in our industrialization program. The
industrialization program began in July 2008 and was completed
in June 2011, with the initial supply of the Unifill syringe to
Sanofi in July 2011.
The supply agreement, if completed, will provide that Sanofi and
its affiliates will purchase the final product exclusively from
us, and the industrialization agreement provides that we are not
required to commit more than 30% of our expected installed
production capacity to Sanofi and its affiliates for the
12 months following the receipt of a purchase order. Orders
from Sanofi, that will exceed the 30% capacity limit will
require up to a maximum of 24 months lead time before we
are required to commence delivery of that order.
Pursuant to the industrialization agreement, if we agree to, or
propose to agree to, a change of control with a third party, we
must give written notice to Sanofi, who will be entitled, within
five business days, to make an offer on at least equivalent
terms. In the absence of an improved change of control proposal,
we must accept the matching offer of Sanofi subject to
shareholder approval. If we receive an improved change of
control offer from the third party, then we must give further
notice to Sanofi for it to make a further matching offer. In
addition, if during the term of the industrialization agreement,
a change of control that does not involve Sanofi, or its
affiliates, obtaining control of the company (i) is not
recommended by our board of directors, (ii) will cause harm
to Sanofi, as defined in the agreement or (iii) under which
Mr. Alan Shortall, our CEO and director, is not to continue
in such capacities for at least two years after the change of
control, then Sanofi will have the right to terminate the
industrialization agreement within ten business days after
receiving a notice from us, or after it otherwise becomes aware
of the change of control. Pursuant to the industrialization
agreement, a change of control means, in general terms, a change
in the ownership of 50% or more of our shares or the power to
determine the majority composition of our board of directors or
any other event that our board determines to be a change of
control event.
Other
Pharmaceutical Relationships
We are seeking to establish relationships with a number of
pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies regarding the supply
and use of the Unifill syringe with their injectable drugs
outside of those therapeutic classes retained by Sanofi. These
relationships may include the signing of commercial agreements
relating to the sale of the Unifill syringe, or the provision of
exclusive access to the device within designated therapeutic
sub-classes
in exchange for upfront fees or royalty payments.
We are also engaging in active discussions with many
pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies regarding the
development and use of other proprietary devices within our
portfolio of advanced drug delivery systems. These devices
include other primary drug containers within our Unifill family
of
ready-to-fill
syringes, as well as other patient-self injection systems, drug
reconstitution systems and target organ delivery devices. We
expect to enter into development programs with some of these
pharmaceutical companies to design, develop and supply devices
for initial use in scheduled clinical trials for target pipeline
drugs. Subject to the commercial approval of these drug-device
combination products by regulatory agencies, we intend to enter
into long-term supply agreements for the
15
production and sale of these devices to the pharmaceutical
company. These partnerships may also include the payment of
exclusivity or access fees to enable the pharmaceutical company
to generate brand differentiation within a therapeutic drug
class against other brand-name, generic or biosimilar
competitors.
As of September 1, 2011, Unilife had commenced the supply of the
Unifill syringe to one additional U.S. based pharmaceutical
company. In addition, we have developed a novel device for
targeted organ delivery that has already been selected by a
large global pharmaceutical company for use in upcoming clinical
trials in conjunction with a pipeline biologic.
Manufacturing
Our center of operations is a
state-of-the-art
manufacturing facility located in York, Pennsylvania. This
state-of-the-art
facility serves as an integrated center for device innovation,
bringing together the people, production systems, design
expertise and quality processes necessary to design and develop
best-in-class
drug delivery systems. Designed by architects who have
substantial experience in designing facilities used to develop,
produce and supply medical devices, the FDA-registered site
plays a key role in ensuring that we comply with stringent
internal and industry standards for quality and reliability.
Our 165,000-square-foot site includes eleven Class 7 and
Class 8 clean rooms totaling 40,000 square feet in
size. Environmental factors, including temperature, moisture and
particulates, are tightly controlled. Additional features
include a Water for Injection system, bio-analytical
and quality laboratories, a product development center, a
machine shop and a 20,000-square-foot warehouse. The facility
gives us the capacity to meet the immediate requirements of our
pharmaceutical companies, and to progressively expand in line
with the development and commercial launch of a series of
drug-device combination products.
Activities undertaken at the site include device design, rapid
prototyping, pilot and commercial production, bio-analytical
testing, packaging, quality assurance and supply chain. All
activities at Unilife are guided by advanced business systems,
such as SAP ERP, that complement those of pharmaceutical
companies. Our Quality Management System is fully certified to
ISO 13485 and operates in compliance with 21 CRF 210/211 for
pharmaceuticals and 21 CFR 820 for medical devices.
We source the production of components and other raw materials
utilized in the production of our proprietary devices under
written contracts with a variety of suppliers, all of which
specialize in the medical device and pharmaceutical sectors.
These components are shipped to our York, Pennsylvania facility
for quality review, assembly, qualification and packaging.
Due to an initial requirement for only limited production
volumes of components which comprise the Unifill syringe, we
currently receive a majority of components, such as rubber seals
and glass barrels, from a single-source supplier. To support the
industrialization program for this product and further
strengthen our supply chain in the long-term, we intend to
establish, wherever feasible, a dual-source strategy for the
production of key components, raw materials and related
services. The companies we expect to appoint for the production
and supply of items and related services pertaining to the
Unifill syringe all have an established presence in the
international drug delivery market, with the majority having
facilities in North America
and/or
Europe. It is our intention to utilize United States made
components whenever possible.
All of our proprietary devices are assembled by us at our York,
PA facility utilizing pilot or commercial assembly systems. The
automated assembly system used to manufacture our Unitract 1mL
syringes has an optimum capacity of up to 30 million units
per year, and was fully designed, developed, built and qualified
by our in-house team. The development of the automated assembly
lines used to manufacture the Unifill syringe was outsourced to
Mikron Assembly Technology, an established industry specialist.
The automated assembly system supplied to us by Mikron and now
located at our York, PA facility can support the commercial
production of up to 60 million units per year of the
Unifill syringe. Additional assembly lines, which will be
ordered in line with customer demands, are targeted to have an
annual manufacturing capacity of approximately 150 million
units per year.
16
Sales and
Marketing
Our primary target customers are pharmaceutical and
biotechnology companies which utilize our advanced drug delivery
systems to contain injectable drugs and vaccines supplied in a
liquid stable or lyophilized form for reconstitution at the
point of delivery. These devices are targeted for use within
healthcare facilities or by patients that self-administer
prescription medication. We are at various stages of discussion
with a number of pharmaceutical companies related to entering
commercial contracts regarding the development, commercial
supply and exclusive use of a variety of our devices.
For the Unifill syringe, we expect the supply of initial
production batches to pharmaceutical companies, will be utilized
for compatibility and stability studies with target drugs and
vaccines. These compatibility and stability studies seek to
determine that materials within the device fluid path are
compatible with the designated drug to attain a shelf-life of
two years or more. This data is utilized in the filing of
regulatory applications by the pharmaceutical companies seeking
approval of the drug-device combination product. We expect to
enter into supply agreements with pharmaceutical companies
relating to the use of the Unifill syringe with specific drugs
and vaccines during the course of compatibility and stability
studies to facilitate the building of product inventory in
anticipation of commercial launch of the drug-device combination
product.
For other pipeline drug delivery devices in our portfolio, we
expect to enter into development agreements with a
pharmaceutical company under which they will provide funding to
support its industrialization or customization for use with a
target drug or vaccine.
The majority of the pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies
with whom we are in active discussions are multinational
companies with headquarters located in the United States, Europe
or Asia. In the majority of cases, these pharmaceutical and
biotechnology companies are large multinational organizations
which are ranked as being among the top twenty in the world. The
majority of these pharmaceutical companies specialize in the
development of novel (brand-name) drugs and vaccines. However we
may also enter into relationships with pharmaceutical
manufacturers of generic or biosimilar drugs, which also
recognize the commercial opportunities of utilizing our
proprietary devices to generate market differentiation against
either the brand-name, other generic or biosimilar competition.
We expect the pharmaceutical company to be primarily responsible
for the sale, marketing and clinical use of the combination
drug-delivery device to target government agencies, healthcare
facilities or patients who self-administer prescription
medication within indicated therapeutic drug classes. We expect
to support pharmaceutical companies in the development of
documentation or marketing material pertaining to the
recommended clinical use of the device with the contained drug
or vaccine.
We may also enter into agreements for the supply of the Unitract
1mL syringes directly to pharmaceutical companies for use with
injectable drug products which are supplied in a vial and
marketed in a kit format. We also distribute our Unitract 1mL
syringes within the United States via distributors which
specialize in target markets such as long-term and acute care
healthcare facilities. We are also examining opportunities to
enter into relationships for our Unitract 1mL syringes with
group purchasing organizations, or GPOs, which secure
competitive pricing for items such as syringes on behalf of
members such as acute-care hospitals. Over the past decade, many
GPOs have introduced programs that encourage the expedient
evaluation and selection of innovative products developed by
smaller companies. However, we do not expect to fully penetrate
the acute-care hospital market until we complete the line of
Unitract Clinical Range of larger sizes and access a larger
network of customer support representatives and sales agents.
Outside of the United States, we have distributors to sell our
Unitract 1mL syringes in India, China, Japan and Taiwan where
they are applying for regulatory approval. We also expect to
appoint other distributors within other international healthcare
markets such as Western Europe and the Asia-Pacific region.
Furthermore, we intend to review opportunities to collaborate
with governments seeking to examine the use of our Unitract 1mL
syringes as a means of helping to prevent the re-use, sharing
and unsafe disposal of non-sterile syringes by IDUs.
We have a small internal team focused on the commercial
development, strategic marketing, clinical support and sale of
our proprietary devices to pharmaceutical and biotechnology
companies. Many members of this team have strong industry
expertise and deep relationships within the pharmaceutical
market, which are utilized to
17
generate and progress commercial discussions. In addition, we
also receive direct enquiries or Request for Proposals from
pharmaceutical companies regarding the potential use of our
devices with their target drugs. In some instances, we expect to
be approached by pharmaceutical companies with unmet needs for a
drug delivery system, whereby we will develop and customize the
device to address the specific molecular and patient requirement
of the target drug. We also attend a number of industry events,
trade shows and conferences, and advertise within selected
industry media publications whereby we exhibit, network and
promote our products and services to prospective customers.
Intellectual
Property
Patents, trademarks and other proprietary rights are very
important to our business. We also rely on a combination of
trade secrets and manufacturing know-how to protect our
intellectual property. We hold numerous patents and patent
applications covering our products and technologies. Our focus
is to safeguard the intellectual property surrounding our
devices, manufacturing processes and other related technologies
to protect not only our position, but that of our strategic
partners and customers.
As of July 2011, we had 45 issued patents relating to our safety
syringe and primary drug container platforms across 19 countries
including the United States and China. We have filed 66 patent
applications in 23 jurisdictions, including Europe, where the
applications are reviewed by the 30 countries that participate
under the Madrid Protocol. We have filed a significant number of
patent applications that are now pending in other countries
covered under the Patent Cooperation Treaty.
Our patents relating to our safety syringe technologies expire
at various dates between 2018 and 2030. Patents relating to the
Unifill syringe are expected to expire by 2030. We also enter
into non-disclosure agreements with certain vendors and
customers. It is also our policy to have employees sign
confidentiality, non-compete and intellectual property
assignment agreements.
We classify our patents and patent applications as they relate
to particular product categories including 1mL insulin and safe
syringes with an attached needle; clinical syringes which
include larger sizes and interchangeable luer needles; and our
Unifill syringe. Many of the features claimed in the insulin and
safe syringes patents, such as the mechanism allowing automatic
and controlled needle retraction within an integrated medical
device, also apply to our other safety syringe products,
including the Unifill syringe. Some key patents covering
countries such as Australia, the United States and Europe, as
well as some of our international patent applications, are
described below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Document
|
|
Patent Number
|
|
Application Number
|
|
Publication Number
|
|
Date
|
|
UNITRACT 1mL SYRINGE
|
Australia
|
|
|
PATENT 731159
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22 September 2018
|
|
USA
|
|
|
PATENT 6,083,199
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
22 September 2018
|
|
IPA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PCT/AU2004/000354
|
|
|
|
WO 2004/082747
|
|
|
|
|
|
Australia
|
|
|
PATENT 2004222676
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AU2004222676
|
|
|
|
19 March 2024
|
|
Canada
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2518360
|
|
|
|
CA2518360
|
|
|
|
|
|
China
|
|
|
PATENT ZL
200480007595.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CN1761497 -
CN100479876
|
|
|
|
19 March 2024
|
|
Europe
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
04721775.7
|
|
|
|
EP1608421
|
|
|
|
|
|
India
|
|
|
PATENT 228410
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19 March 2024
|
|
Japan
|
|
|
PATENT 4652326
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
JP2006520219 -
JP04652326
|
|
|
|
19 March 2024
|
|
USA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
US 10/549,710
|
|
|
|
US-2006-0235354
|
|
|
|
|
|
Taiwan
|
|
|
PATENT 253944
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TWI253944
|
|
|
|
19 March 2024
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Document
|
|
Patent Number
|
|
Application Number
|
|
Publication Number
|
|
Date
|
|
UNITRACT 3mL and 5mL RETRACTABLE SYRINGE with INTERCHANGEABLE
NEEDLE
|
IPA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PCT/AU2005/000107
|
|
|
|
WO 2005/072801
(11.08.2005
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Australia
|
|
|
PATENT 2005209014
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AU2005209014
|
|
|
|
28 January 2025
|
|
Canada
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2554196
|
|
|
|
CA2554196
|
|
|
|
|
|
China
|
|
|
PATENT 731869
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CN1929887A
|
|
|
|
28 January 2025
|
|
Europe
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
05700138.0
|
|
|
|
EP1708772
|
|
|
|
|
|
USA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10/587,705
|
|
|
|
US20080255513
|
|
|
|
|
|
Taiwan
|
|
|
PATENT I 290840
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TWI290840
|
|
|
|
28 January 2025
|
|
IPA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PCT/AU2006/000618
|
|
|
|
WO 2006/119570
(16-11-2006
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Australia
|
|
|
PATENT 2006246309
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AU2006246309
|
|
|
|
11 May 2026
|
|
Canada
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2607836
|
|
|
|
CA2607836
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PATENT ZL
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
China
|
|
|
200680016383.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CN101203258
|
|
|
|
10 May 2026
|
|
Europe
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
06721494.0
|
|
|
|
EP1879635 (23-01-2008
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
India
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8880/DELNP/2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
USA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11/914,092
|
|
|
|
20090221962
|
|
|
|
|
|
IPA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PCT/AU2010/001504
|
|
|
|
WO2011/057334
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Document
|
|
Patent Number
|
|
Application Number
|
|
Publication Number
|
|
Date
|
|
UNIFILL 1.0mL CONTROLLED RETRACTION
READY-TO-FILL
SYRINGE
|
IPA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PCT/AU2006/000516
|
|
|
|
WO 2006/108243
(19.10.2006
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Australia
|
|
|
PATENT 2006235224
|
|
|
|
2010210012
|
|
|
|
AU2006235224
|
|
|
|
18 April 2026
|
|
Canada
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2604322
|
|
|
|
CA2604322
|
|
|
|
|
|
China
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
200680019140.7
|
|
|
|
CN101203256A
(18-06-2008
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Europe
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
06721397.5
|
|
|
|
EP1868669 (26.12.2007
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
India
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4637/CHENP/2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Japan
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008-505695
|
|
|
|
JP2008 535589
(04-09-2008
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
USA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11/911,481
|
|
|
|
US2009093759
|
|
|
|
|
|
IPA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PCT/AU2008/000971
|
|
|
|
WO 2009/003234 A1
(08.01.2009
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Australia
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008271920
|
|
|
|
AU2008271920
|
|
|
|
|
|
Canada
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CA 2,692,968
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
China
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
200880021389.0
|
|
|
|
CN 101730558
(09-06-2010
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Europe
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
08757038.8
|
|
|
|
EP2162173
|
|
|
|
|
|
India
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7710/CHENP/2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Israel
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
202736
|
|
|
|
IL202736
|
|
|
|
|
|
Japan
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010-513584
|
|
|
|
JP2010-531679
(30.09.2010
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
US20110015572-A1
|
|
|
|
|
|
USA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12/666448
|
|
|
|
(20.01.2011
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Taiwan
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
97124808
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
IPA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PCT/AU2010/001677
|
|
|
|
WO 2011/075760 A1
(30.06.2011
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
IPA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PCT/AU2011/000515
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
IPA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PCT/AU2010/001505
|
|
|
|
WO 2011/057335 A1
|
|
|
|
|
|
19
We have registered trademarks including Unilife, Unitract and
Unifill in a number of key countries and regions including the
United States.
Government
Regulation
The development, manufacture, sale and distribution of medical
devices are subject to comprehensive government regulation. Our
medical devices and manufacturing operations are subject to
regulation under the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act, or the
FDC Act, as implemented and enforced by the FDA and various
other federal and state agencies and are also subject to
regulation by foreign governmental agencies. These laws and
regulations govern the development, testing, manufacturing,
labeling, advertising, marketing and distribution and market
surveillance of medical devices.
FDAs
Premarket Clearance and Approval Requirements
Unless an exemption applies, each medical device we wish to
distribute commercially in the United States will require either
prior 510(k) clearance or premarket approval from the FDA. The
FDA classifies medical devices intended for human use into three
classes: Class I, Class II and Class III.
Class I or Class II devices require the manufacturer
to submit to the FDA a premarket notification requesting
permission to commercially distribute the device. This process
is generally known as 510(k) clearance. Class III devices
require premarket approval. Our clinical ranges of syringes,
including our Unitract 1mL syringe, are Class II devices.
Our Unifill syringe does not require 510(k) clearance because it
will be sold to drug manufacturers in its component parts for
use as a primary packaging container.
There is a different regulatory process that will apply to our
Unifill syringe because it will not be distributed as a device.
It will be used as a primary container by drug manufacturers to
provide drugs in a prefilled format. In the case of the Unifill
syringe, it is the responsibility of the pharmaceutical company
who will use the Unifill syringe for its drug to obtain final
product approvals, either by submitting a new drug application
or abbreviated new drug application. In order to support the
pharmaceutical companys application, we intend to create
what is known as a Drug Master File (DMF). A DMF is
a submission to the FDA that may be used to provide information
about facilities, processes or articles used in the
manufacturing, packaging and storing of one or more human drugs.
The DMF will define the manufacturing and safety characteristics
of the Unifill syringe while protecting proprietary information
regarding its technical design.
510(k)
Clearance Pathway
When applying for 510(k) clearance, we must submit a premarket
notification demonstrating that our proposed device is
substantially equivalent to another legally marketed product
(i.e., that it has the same intended use and that it is as safe
and effective as a legally marketed, or predicate device and
does not raise different questions of safety or effectiveness
than does a predicate device). According to FDA regulations, the
FDA is required to clear or deny a 510(k) premarket notification
within 90 days of submission of the application, or
30 days in the case of an abbreviated 510(k) application
that may be filed for product line extensions. As a practical
matter, 510(k) clearance often takes between three and twelve
months.
We received 510(k) clearance for our Unitract 1mL insulin
syringe in October 2008 that covered the production of the
device by a contractor outside the United States. We received
510(k) clearance for the production of our Unitract 1mL insulin
syringe at our Pennsylvania manufacturing facility in March
2010. We received 510(k) clearance for the production of our
Unitract 1mL turberculin syringe at our Pennsylvania
manufacturing facility in September 2010.
Premarket
Approval Pathway
A premarket approval application must be submitted to the FDA if
the device cannot be cleared through the 510(k) process. A
premarket approval application must be supported by extensive
data, including, but not limited to, technical, preclinical,
clinical trials, manufacturing and labeling to demonstrate to
the FDAs satisfaction the safety and effectiveness of the
device. To the best of our knowledge, this process does not
apply to our current range of products.
20
Pervasive
and Continuing Regulation
After a device is placed on the market, numerous regulatory
requirements apply. These include:
|
|
|
|
|
quality system regulations, or QSR, which require manufacturers,
including third-party manufacturers, to follow stringent design,
testing, control, documentation and other quality assurance
procedures during all aspects of the manufacturing process;
|
|
|
|
labeling regulations and FDA prohibitions against the promotion
of products for uncleared, unapproved or off label
uses;
|
|
|
|
medical device reporting regulations, which require that
manufacturers report to the FDA if their device may have caused
or contributed to a death or serious injury or malfunctioned in
a way that would likely cause or contribute to a death or
serious injury if the malfunction were to occur; and
|
|
|
|
post-market surveillance regulations, which apply when necessary
to protect the public health or to provide additional safety and
effectiveness data for the device.
|
The FDA has broad post-market and regulatory enforcement powers.
We are subject to unannounced inspections by the FDA to
determine our compliance with the QSR and other regulations, and
these inspections may include the manufacturing facilities of
our manufacturing subcontractors.
Failure to comply with applicable regulatory requirements can
result in enforcement action by the FDA, which may include any
or all of the following sanctions:
|
|
|
|
|
fines, injunctions, consent decrees and civil penalties;
|
|
|
|
recall or seizure of our products;
|
|
|
|
operating restrictions, partial suspensions or total shutdown of
production;
|
|
|
|
refusing our requests for 510(k) clearance or premarket approval
of new products or new intended uses;
|
|
|
|
withdrawing 510(k) clearance or premarket approvals that are
already granted; and
|
|
|
|
criminal prosecution.
|
Regulation
in the European Union and Australia
The European Union has adopted numerous directives regulating
the design, manufacture, clinical trials, labeling and adverse
event reporting for medical devices. Devices that comply with
the requirements of the relevant directive will be entitled to
bear CE conformity marking, indicating that the device conforms
with the essential requirements of the applicable directives
and, accordingly, can be commercially distributed throughout the
member states of the European Union. The method of assessing
conformity varies depending on the type and class of the
product, but normally involves a combination of self-assessment
by the manufacturer and a third party assessment by a
Notified Body which is an independent and neutral
institution appointed by a country to conduct the conformity
assessment. This third-party assessment may consist of an audit
of the manufacturers quality system and specific testing
of the manufacturers device. An assessment by a Notified
Body in one member state of the European Union is required in
order for a manufacturer to commercially distribute the product
throughout these countries. ISO 9001 and ISO 13845 are voluntary
harmonized standards. Compliance establishes the presumption of
conformity with the essential requirements for CE Marking. In
July 2009, we received our ISO 13485:2003 quality system
certification. Our certification includes the design,
development, production and distribution or sterile syringes and
insulin syringes.
We have successfully completed a Notified Body audit to allow
our Unitract syringes to bear the CE mark resulting in CE
certification for our Unitract insulin and tuberculin 1mL
syringes.
In Australia, the Therapeutic Goods Administration, or TGA, is
responsible for administering the Australian Therapeutics Goods
Act. The Office of Devices, Blood and Tissues is the department
within the TGA responsible for medical devices. The Australian
Register of Therapeutic Goods, or ARTG, controls the legal
supply of therapeutic goods in Australia. The ARTG is the
register of information about therapeutic goods for human use
that
21
may be imported, supplied in, or exported from Australia. Any
use of an unapproved medical device in humans, even in pilot
trials, requires an exemption from the requirement for inclusion
on the ARTG. US manufacturers seeking to market product in
Australia must acquire CE certification and lodge manufacturer
evidence, including the CE certificate and a Declaration of
Conformity to Australian Requirements, with the TGA. The lodging
of this information with the TGA is completed by an Australian
sponsor, with the assistance/support of the manufacturer. Upon
TGA acceptance of the manufacturer evidence, the Australian
sponsor/manufacturer must create a medical device inclusion in
the ARTG and only is then able to release USA-manufactured
product in Australia. Our only product that is included on the
ARTG is our Unitract 1mL syringe that was previously
manufactured for us in China. During June 2010, we received our
CE certification for
U.S.-manufactured
stock of this product. We are currently completing the necessary
registration and listing documents for sale of this product in
Australia.
With regard to the regulatory process in the European Union and
Australia for the Unifill syringe, as in the case of the U.S.,
it is the responsibility of the pharmaceutical company who will
use the Unifill syringe for its drug to obtain final product
approvals.
Other
Regulations
We are also subject to various federal, state and local laws and
regulations, both in the United States and other international
territories where we conduct business, relating to such matters
as safe working conditions, laboratory and manufacturing
practices and the use, handling and disposal of hazardous or
potentially hazardous substances used in connection with our
research and development work. Although we believe we are in
compliance with these laws and regulations in all material
respects, we cannot provide assurance that we will not be
required to incur significant costs to comply with environmental
laws or regulations in the future.
We are subject to various federal, state and local laws in the
United States targeting fraud and abuse in the healthcare
industry, which generally prohibit us from soliciting, offering,
receiving or paying any remuneration in order to induce the
ordering or purchasing of items or services that are in any way
paid for by Medicare, Medicaid or other government-sponsored
healthcare programs. Healthcare costs have been and continue to
be a subject of study, investigation and regulation by
governmental agencies and legislative bodies around the world.
The U.S. federal government continues to scrutinize
potentially fraudulent practices affecting Medicare, Medicaid
and other government healthcare programs. Payers have become
more influential in the marketplace and increasingly are focused
on drug and medical device pricing, appropriate drug and medical
device utilization and the quality and costs of healthcare.
Violations of fraud and abuse-related laws are punishable by
criminal or civil sanctions, including substantial fines,
imprisonment and exclusion from participation in healthcare
programs such as Medicare and Medicaid and health programs
outside the United States.
Competition
The healthcare equipment, pharmaceutical and medical device
industry sectors in which we operate are highly competitive. We
compete with many companies, both public and private, that range
in size from small, highly focused businesses to large
diversified multinational manufacturers of healthcare and
pharmaceutical equipment, as more fully described below. Some of
the large and established companies we are aware of which are
active in the injectable drug delivery device market include
Becton Dickinson (BD), SCHOTT forma vitrum AG
(Schott), Baxter Biopharma, B. Braun, Gerresheimer
Bünde GmbH (Gerresheimer), Terumo, West Pharma,
Ypsomed and Owen Mumford. We believe that collectively, these
companies represent the significant majority of total revenues
for this market, with BD having the largest share. Most of these
companies are larger and better-capitalized than we are and have
an extensive base of pharmaceutical companies. However, we are
aware of very few, if any, other companies, that have developed
a broad and diversified portfolio of primary drug containers and
other advanced drug delivery systems that are suitable for drugs
and vaccines supplied in either a liquid stable or
reconstitution form for injection as Unilifes.
Ready-to-Fill
(Prefilled Syringes)
We do not believe there are any other companies that offer a
ready-to-fill
syringe with safety features which are fully integrated within
the glass barrel. However there is a highly concentrated market
for the production of standard
22
ready-to-fill
syringes for supply to pharmaceutical manufacturers. We are
aware of five companies which specialize in the production and
supply of glass
ready-to-fill
syringes. These companies are BD, Gerresheimer, MGlas AG, Schott
and Nuova Ompi. We estimate the market concentration rate for
these five companies to be approximately 95%. We believe
BDs market share to be in excess of 50%, as it has supply
relationships with most pharmaceutical companies and contract
manufacturing organizations. Of these five aforementioned
companies, we believe that BD is the only one which also markets
and supplies ancillary safety products for attachment onto
standard prefilled syringes to assist pharmaceutical companies
in their compliance with needle stick prevention laws. We are
aware of another specialist supplier of ancillary safety
products, Safety Syringes Inc, which has contracts with a number
of pharmaceutical manufacturers.
Hypodermic
Clinical Syringes Used with Vials
The global market for hypodermic clinical (non-pre-filled)
syringes is highly competitive, with at least 50 manufacturers
located across North America, Europe and the Asia-Pacific. The
market for clinical safety syringes is relatively less
competitive, yet highly concentrated. We believe BD is the
largest global supplier of clinical safety syringes. Other
companies which compete in this market sector include
Retractable Technologies, Inc, Covidien and Smiths Medical. All
of these companies offer a full range of clinical safety
syringes, operate a strong sales, distribution and customer
support network, and have existing supply relationships with
major healthcare buying groups.
Auto-Injectors
The global market for patient self-injection devices such as
auto-injectors is relatively consolidated, with BD and a handful
of other companies including Ypsomed, Owen Mumford and
SHL Group holding the majority of market share.
Subcutaneous
Pump Infusion Systems
The global market for subcutaneous drug infusion systems
targeted for the administration of large volume, highly viscous
biologics (outside of the diabetes class) is emerging. We are
not aware of any company that commercially markets these systems
in a volume size of 5mL or larger. Companies which are active in
the more general market for patch pump infusion systems targeted
for use with insulin include large established companies such as
BD and Medtronic, as well as smaller companies such as Insulet.
Research
and Development
During the fiscal years ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, we
invested approximately $9.6 million and $10.9 million,
respectively, on research and development of our technologies.
Research and development costs include activities related to the
research, development, design, testing, and manufacturing of
prototypes of our products. They also include clinical
activities and regulatory costs as well as expenses associated
with certain consultants engaged in research and development
activities along with a portion of the overhead costs we incur
to operate our manufacturing facility.
Employees
As of September 1, 2011, we had 129 employees and
associates, of whom 100 are engaged in operations activities
including research and development, quality assurance and
manufacturing activities, 7 are engaged in sales, marketing and
clinical activities and 22 are engaged in finance, legal and
other administrative functions. Most of our employees and all of
our executive officers are located at our York, Pennsylvania
facility. A small number of our employees, mainly focused on
research and development, are located in Radnor, Pennsylvania
and Australia. None of our employees are represented by a labor
union or covered by a collective bargaining agreement. We
consider our relations with our employees to be good.
23
Corporate
History
Unilife Corporation was incorporated in Delaware on July 2,
2009 as a wholly-owned subsidiary of UMSL. As we describe in
more detail under Managements Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations Redomiciliation., on
January 27, 2010, Unilife Corporation became the parent
company of UMSL upon completion of the redomiciliation and
UMSLs shareholders and option holders exchanged their
interests in UMSL for equivalent interests in Unilife
Corporation. Our principal executive offices are located at 250
Cross Farm Lane, York, Pennsylvania 17406. Our telephone number
is +1 717 384 3400.
UMSL was incorporated on June 28, 1985, in South Australia,
Australia. The registered office of UMSL is located at
Suite 3, Level 11, 1 Chifley Square, Sydney NSW 2000.
Originally known as Musgrave Block Holdings Limited, UMSL
acquired all of the issued shares of Unitract Pty Limited in
November 2002, and changed its name to Unitract Limited (now
Unilife Medical Solutions Limited), listed on the Australian
Securities Exchange, or ASX under the ticker UNI and
continued the business operations of Unitract Pty Limited and
the development of Unitract Pty Limiteds retractable
syringe project. In January 2007, in order to obtain a
manufacturing presence in the United States, UMSL acquired all
the stock of Integrated BioSciences, Inc., a Pennsylvania-based
company, which in February 2009 changed its corporate name to
Unilife Medical Solutions, Inc. At the time of its acquisition
by UMSL, Integrated BioSciences, Inc. was in the business of
contract manufacturing of syringes for third parties and
developing automated assembly equipment.
Financial
Information about Geographical Areas
See note 3 to our consolidated financial statements for
information regarding our sales by geographic area.
Available
Information
We maintain an internet website at www.unilife.com. Our
annual report on
Form 10-K,
quarterly reports on
Form 10-Q,
current reports on
Form 8-K,
and amendments to those reports are available free of charge
through the Investor Relations portion of our
website, as soon as reasonably practicable after they are filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The information
posted on our website is not incorporated into this Annual
Report on
Form 10-K.
Directors
and Executive Officers
The following table sets forth the name, age and position of
each of our directors and executive officers.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name
|
|
Age
|
|
Position
|
|
Slavko James Joseph Bosnjak
|
|
|
62
|
|
|
Chairman and Director
|
Alan Shortall
|
|
|
57
|
|
|
Director and Chief Executive Officer
|
John Lund
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
Director
|
William Galle
|
|
|
71
|
|
|
Director
|
Jeff Carter
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
Director
|
Mary Katherine Wold
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
Director
|
Marc S. Firestone
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
Director
|
Ramin Mojdehbakhsh
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
Chief Operating Officer and Executive Vice President
|
R. Richard Wieland II
|
|
|
66
|
|
|
Chief Financial Officer and Executive Vice President
|
Mark V. Iampietro
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
Vice President of Quality and Regulatory Affairs
|
Stephen Allan
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
Vice President of Marketing and Communications
|
J. Christopher Naftzger
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
Vice President, General Counsel, Corporate Secretary and Chief
Compliance Officer
|
Biographical
Summaries
Slavko James Joseph Bosnjak. Mr. Bosnjak
has served as a director of UMSL since February 2003 and of
Unilife Corporation since November 2009 and as Chairman of the
board of UMSL since April 2006 and of Unilife
24
Corporation since November 2009, Mr. Bosnjak has been a
co-owner and director of the Le Meridien Lav Hotel in Split,
Croatia since 2002 and is chairman and co-founder of Ultimate
Outdoor Ltd., an Australian outdoor advertising company,
Mr. Bosnjak is chairman, and has an indirect interest
through the family company Bosnjak Investment Group Pty Ltd, of
Chiron Commercial Vehicles Pty Ltd and its subsidiaries,
situated in Malaysia, a company which manufactures bus bodies
for export to Australia. Mr Bosnjak was a director of Bosnjak
Holdings Pty Ltd and its subsidiaries including Westbus Pty Ltd.
from 1975 to 2001 and the chairman of Westbus Pty Ltd, between
1990 and 2001. He has also held positions on Commonwealth and
New South Wales government advisory bodies, including the
Greater Western Sydney Economic Development Board, and the GROW
Employment Council. Mr. Bosnjak also served as the Chairman
of the Tourism Council of Australia and Bus 2000 Ltd, which
coordinated bus services for the Sydney 2000 Olympic Games.
Mr. Bosnjak was awarded an Order of Australia Medal in 1994
for his services to transport and the community, and also holds
an honorary doctorate from the University of Western Sydney for
his services related to employment growth and economic
development.
Alan Shortall. Mr. Shortall has served as
Chief Executive Officer and director of UMSL since September
2002 and of Unilife Corporation since July 2009.
Mr. Shortall founded Unilife in July 2002 and has guided
the growth of Unilife since then. In 2008, the trade magazine
Medical Device and Diagnostic Industry named him as one
of 100 Notable People in the medical device industry worldwide.
Mr. Shortall is the brother of Eugene Shortall, our Senior
Vice President of Business Development.
John Lund. Mr. Lund has served as a
director of UMSL and Unilife Corporation since November 2009.
Mr. Lund has also served as managing partner of M&A
Holdings, LLC, a private consulting company since July 2003, and
as Vice President Finance and Controller of
E-rewards,
Inc., an internet market research company since February 2009.
Mr. Lund also served as Vice President and Controller of
Nexstar Broadcasting Group, Inc., a NASDAQ listed television
broadcasting company, from March 2008 to November 2008, Vice
President of Finance and Corporate Controller of LQ Management,
LLC (LaQuinta) from November 2006 to March 2008, and Corporate
Controller of ExcellerateHRO from January 2005 to October 2006.
Prior to that, Mr. Lund held Controller and Chief Financial
Officer positions for various companies, and was a Manager at
KPMG.
William Galle. Mr. Galle has served as a
director of UMSL since June 2008 and of Unilife Corporation
since November 2009. Mr. Galle was also an independent
director of American Marketing Complex in New York City from
October 2007 to December 2009. Since 2009, Mr. Galle has
been affiliated with Bradley Woods, a 40 year-old New York
City-based independent research and investment banking firm
specializing in federal regulatory and legislative developments
impacting substantial investor portfolios. Mr. Galle is
President of Diversified Portfolio Strategies LLC in Washington
D.C. since 1993, which provides alternative investment advisory
services for institutions and substantial investors.
Mr. Galle is a graduate of Columbia University, Rutgers
University, and the New York Institute of Finance.
Jeff Carter. Mr. Carter has served as a
director of UMSL since April 2006 and of Unilife Corporation
since November 2009. From February 2005 until January 2009,
Mr. Carter served as Chief Financial Officer of UMSL. He
has also served as Company Secretary of UMSL from March 2007 to
July 2010. Mr. Carter is a chartered accountant and holds a
masters degree in applied finance from Macquarie
University of Sydney. Mr. Carter was a Chief Financial
Officer of various publicly listed healthcare companies prior to
joining UMSL. Also, Mr. Carter was Strategic Planning
Manager for
Coca-Cola
Amatil and Manager Corporate Development International for
Santos. He has international experience with these companies and
was formerly a Senior Manager of Touche Ross before moving into
investment banking with Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce.
Mary Katherine Wold. Ms. Wold has served
as a director of Unilife Corporation since May 2010.
Ms. Wold is President and Chief Executive Officer of the
Church Pension Group, which provides retirement, health, and
life insurance benefits to its clergy and lay employees of the
U.S. Episcopal Church. Ms. Wold served as Senior Vice
President of Finance from 2007 to 2009, Senior Vice President of
Tax and Treasury from 2005 to 2007 and Vice President of Tax
from 2002 to 2005, of Wyeth, a NYSE-listed pharmaceutical
company, which was acquired by Pfizer in October 2009. Prior
thereto, Ms. Wold spent 17 years with the
international law firm of Shearman & Sterling based in
New York, specializing in international tax planning for
multinational corporations and in the tax aspects of mergers and
acquisitions, capital markets and private equity transactions.
Ms. Wold received her law
25
degree from the University of Michigan and her Bachelor of Arts
degree from Hamline University in St. Paul, Minnesota.
Marc S. Firestone. Mr. Firestone has
served as a director of Unilife Corporation since July 2010.
Mr. Firestone serves as Executive Vice President and
General Counsel for Kraft Foods Inc., a Fortune
100 company. Prior to his position at Kraft Foods,
Mr. Firestone held senior executive positions for Philip
Morris Companies and its subsidiaries, including as Senior Vice
President and General Counsel, Philip Morris International, and
Senior Vice President of Regulatory Affairs, Phillip Morris
Companies. Before joining Philip Morris, he was an attorney with
Arnold & Porter in Washington, D.C. He holds a
juris doctorate from Tulane University School of Law in New
Orleans, and a bachelors degree from
Washington & Lee University in Virginia.
Ramin Mojdehbakhsh. Mr. Mojdehbakhsh has
served as Chief Operating Officer and Executive Vice President
since February 2011. Mr. Mojdehbakhsh served as Vice
President and General Manager of BD Pharmaceutical Systems,
North America between 2008 and 2010 and Worldwide Vice President
of Research and Development, BD Medical between 2002 and 2008.
Dr. Mojdehbakhsh received a Ph.D. in Computer Science from
the University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN and his MBA from
Kellogg Graduate School of Management, Northwestern University,
Evanston, Illinois.
R. Richard Wieland II. Mr. Wieland
has served as Chief Financial Officer and Executive Vice
President since June 2010. Mr. Wieland served as Chief
Financial Officer of Cytochroma Inc., a privately-held specialty
pharmaceutical company, from May 2008 to May 2009 and served as
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Advanced
Life Sciences Holdings, Inc., a Nasdaq-listed clinical-stage
biopharmaceutical company, from June 2004 to April 2008.
Mr. Wieland obtained his B.A. in Accounting and Economics
from Monmouth College and his M.B.A. from Washington University.
Mark V. Iampietro. Mr. Iampietro has
served as Vice President of Quality and Regulatory Affairs of
UMSL since October 2008 and of Unilife Corporation since
November 2009. From May 2002 to July 2008, Mr. Iampietro
was Vice President of Quality, Regulatory and Clinical
Operations at Spherics, Inc., a pharmaceutical manufacturer,
where he managed various phases of quality, regulatory, and
clinical programs. Mr. Iampietro holds American Society for
Quality certifications as both a quality and reliability
engineer and holds a Bachelor of Science degree in life sciences
with a minor in engineering from Worcester Polytechnic Institute.
Stephen Allan. Mr. Allan has served as
Vice President of Marketing and Communications of UMSL since
October 2008 and of Unilife Corporation since November 2009. He
served as our Director of Communications from November 2007 to
October 2008 and our Manager of Communications from July 2002 to
November 2007. Prior to joining Unilife, Mr. Allan owned
and operated his own Australian public relations firm, which
assisted in the management of media relations and government
liaison for industry groups in the transport, tourism and
economic development sectors. He managed media liaison
activities relating to bus transportation during the Sydney 2000
Olympic Games. He also spent five years as a journalist for
various Sydney-based newspaper groups. Mr. Allan holds a
Bachelor of Communications from Charles Sturt University.
J. Christopher
Naftzger. Mr. Naftzger has served as Vice
President, General Counsel, Corporate Secretary and Chief
Compliance Officer of Unilife Corporation since July 2010.
Mr. Naftzger served as Assistant General Counsel and
Assistant Secretary of Chesapeake Corporation, a NYSE-traded
packaging company for the pharmaceutical and healthcare
industries, from July 2007 to May 2009 and served as Senior
Counsel of Koch Industries, Inc., the second largest privately
held company in the U.S., from June 2006 to June 2007. Prior to
joining Koch, Mr. Naftzger was a partner at Blank Rome LLP,
an international Am Law 100 firm. Mr. Naftzger obtained his
B.A. in History and Political Science from Hampden-Sydney
College and his J.D. from the Willamette University College of
Law.
Our business faces many risks. We believe the
risks described below are the material risks facing the Company.
However, the risks described below may not be the only risks we
face. Additional unknown risks or risks that we currently
consider immaterial may also impair our business operations. If
any of the events or circumstances described below actually
occurs, our business, financial condition or results of
operations could suffer, and the
26
trading price of our shares of common stock could decline
significantly. Investors should consider the specific risk
factors discussed below, and the other information contained or
incorporated by reference herein and the other documents that we
file from time to time with the Securities and Exchange
Commission.
Risks
Relating to Our Business
We
need additional funding to meet our capital needs. Such funding
may not be available on favorable terms, if at all, and may be
dilutive to our existing stockholders.
We need to obtain additional funding for our product development
programs and commercialization efforts. We cannot provide
assurance that we will be able to raise additional funding, if
needed, on terms favorable to us, or at all. If we raise
additional funds from debt financing, we may be obligated to
abide by restrictive covenants contained in the debt financing
agreements, which may make it more difficult for us to operate
our business. If we raise additional funds through the issuance
of equity securities, our shares of common stock may suffer
dilution. If we are unable to secure additional funding, our
ability to continue our product development and
commercialization programs would be delayed, reduced or
eliminated.
We
have received an audit report that includes an explanatory
paragraph stating that our recurring losses from operations
raise substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going
concern on our 2011 consolidated financial
statements.
The continuation of our company as a going concern is dependent
upon our attaining and maintaining profitable operations
and/or
raising additional capital. Our independent registered public
accounting firm included, in their audit report on our
consolidated financial statements for the year ended
June 30, 2011, an explanatory paragraph regarding the
substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going
concern. Our consolidated financial statements contain
additional note disclosures describing our liquidity. As a
result of this uncertainty, we may have a more difficult time
obtaining necessary financing.
Our
success depends in large part on our ability to achieve
substantial commercial sales of the Unifill syringe to
customers. If we experience problems or delays in securing
favorable agreements to supply the Unifill syringe to customers,
our business, including our ability to generate significant
revenues, will be materially and adversely
affected.
The Unifill syringe is our primary product and, to date, we have
derived substantially all of our revenues from our exclusive
licensing and industrialization agreements with Sanofi related
to its development. However, we have completed the
industrialization program and our ability to generate
significant revenues will now depend on our ability to negotiate
successfully one or more supply agreements for the Unifill
syringe with Sanofi
and/or other
pharmaceutical companies and to begin supplying substantial
quantities of the product under such agreements. We cannot
predict with certainty if and when we will be able to enter into
any supply agreements for the Unifill syringe or what the terms
of any such agreements will be. If we are unable to secure
favorable supply agreements for the Unifill syringe in a timely
manner, our ability to generate significant revenues will be
materially and adversely affected.
We
have recently devoted significant attention and resources
towards the development of other advanced drug delivery systems.
We cannot assure you that we will be able to complete the
development of and successfully commercialize these
systems.
A significant element of our recent strategy focuses on
developing advanced drug delivery systems that deliver greater
benefits to pharmaceutical companies, healthcare workers and
patients. These new advanced drug delivery systems are a
response to changes in technologies, industry standards and the
needs of pharmaceutical companies. Other device companies, and
pharmaceutical companies, are attempting to develop alternative
therapies or drug administration systems such as needle-free or
intradermal injection technology for the treatment or prevention
of various diseases. Our success will depend on developing and
commercializing new advanced drug delivery systems in order to
meet the changing conditions of the marketplace. The development
of these advanced drug delivery
27
systems requires significant research and development, clinical
evaluations, regulatory approvals and expenditures of capital.
The results of our product development efforts may be affected
by a number of factors, including our ability to innovate,
develop and manufacture new products, complete clinical trials,
obtain regulatory approvals and secure customer orders for these
products. In addition, patents obtained by others can preclude
or delay our commercialization of a product. There can be no
assurance that any products now in development, or that we may
seek to develop in the future, will achieve technological
feasibility, obtain regulatory approval or gain market
acceptance. The development of new or improved products,
processes or technologies by other companies may render our
products or proposed products obsolete or less competitive.
We do
not expect to be profitable unless and until we negotiate
commercial supply agreements for the Unifill syringe and/or we
enter into commercial development agreements and commercial
supply agreements with our pharmaceutical partners for other
advanced drug delivery systems.
In addition to the expenses related to the completion of the
industrialization program for the Unifill syringe, we have
incurred and will continue to incur significant expenses related
to the development of other advanced drug delivery systems. We
will also incur general and administrative expenses related to
increasing our manufacturing operations, expanding our sales and
marketing capabilities, seeking regulatory approvals, and
complying with the requirements related to being a public
company in both the United States and Australia. We will not be
profitable unless we are successful in selling the Unifill
syringe
and/or
developing and commercializing our other advanced drug delivery
systems.
The
Unifill syringe has been designed to be compatible with the drug
manufacturing systems currently utilized by Sanofi, which may
hinder our ability to sell the product to other pharmaceutical
customers whose manufacturing processes may not be compatible
with our current product designs.
The Unifill syringe has been designed to be compatible with the
drug filling and packaging systems of Sanofi. To our knowledge,
the majority of fill-finish lines are designed and operated in a
similar way. However, while the standard glass barrels to be
used for the Unifill syringe are also currently utilized by most
pharmaceutical companies, the specific processes used by other
pharmaceutical companies to fill, manufacture or package
prefilled syringes with an injectable drug product may vary from
those of Sanofi. Furthermore, pharmaceutical companies may in
some cases require the use of materials which are biocompatible
with a particular drug compound and to which we do not have
access. Such events may require design, material or process
changes to our product, or restrict our ability to enter into
supply relationships with other pharmaceutical companies and
accordingly, may have a material adverse effect on our results
of operations and financial condition.
We may
encounter difficulties managing our growth, which could
materially harm our business.
We have rapidly expanded our operations, including our research
and development, product development, regulatory, manufacturing,
sales, marketing and administrative functions. This expansion
has placed, and is expected to continue to place, a significant
strain on our management, operational and financial resources.
To manage our growth and to develop and commercialize our
products, we will be required to improve existing, and implement
new, operational and financial systems, procedures and controls
and expand, train and manage our growing employee base. In
addition, we will need to manage relationships with various
manufacturers, suppliers, customers and other organizations. Our
failure to accomplish any of these tasks could materially harm
our business.
We
depend on our executive officers and key personnel and the loss
of them could adversely affect our business.
Our success depends upon the efforts and abilities of our
executive officers and other key personnel, particularly
Mr. Alan Shortall, our Chief Executive Officer, and
Dr. Ramin Mojdeh, our Chief Operating Officer, to provide
strategic direction, manage our operations and maintain a
cohesive and stable environment. Although we have employment
agreements with Mr. Shortall, Dr. Mojdeh and other key
personnel, as well as incentive compensation plans that provide
various economic incentives for them to remain with us, these
agreements and incentives may not be sufficient to retain them.
Our ability to operate successfully and manage our potential
future growth also depends significantly upon our ability to
attract, retain and motivate highly skilled and qualified
28
research, technical, clinical, regulatory, sales, marketing,
managerial and financial personnel. We face intense competition
for such personnel, and we may not be able to attract, retain
and motivate these individuals. The loss of our executive
officers or other key personnel for any reason or our inability
to hire, retain and motivate additional qualified personnel in
the future could prevent us from sustaining or growing our
business. In addition, we have a limited history of operations
under our current officers and directors. Our officers have not
worked together for an extensive length of time. If for any
reason our management members cannot work efficiently as a team,
our business will be adversely affected.
We
will continue to incur significant costs as a result of being a
public company in both the United States and
Australia.
We are subject to the periodic reporting requirements of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the Exchange
Act. Being a public reporting company in the United States
entails significant expense, including costs required for us to
comply with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. In addition, because
our shares of common stock are also listed on the Australian
Securities Exchange (ASX) in the form of CDIs, we
are also required to file financial information and make certain
other filings with the ASX. Our status as a reporting company in
both the United States and Australia makes some activities more
time-consuming and costly and causes us to incur legal,
accounting and other expenses that are higher than those that
are typically incurred by companies that are subject to only one
reporting authority.
Our
manufacturing facilities and the manufacturing facilities of our
suppliers must comply with applicable regulatory requirements.
If we or they fail to achieve or maintain regulatory approval
for these manufacturing facilities, our business and our results
of operations would be harmed.
Commercialization of our products requires access to, or the
development of, manufacturing facilities that meet applicable
regulatory standards to manufacture a sufficient supply of our
products. In addition, the FDA must approve facilities that
manufacture our products for US commercial purposes, as well as
the manufacturing processes and specifications for the product.
Suppliers of components of, and products used to manufacture,
our products must also comply with FDA and foreign regulatory
requirements, which often require significant time, money and
record-keeping and quality assurance efforts and subject us and
our suppliers to potential regulatory inspections and stoppages.
We and our suppliers may not satisfy these requirements. If we
or our suppliers do not achieve or maintain required regulatory
approval for our manufacturing operations, our commercialization
efforts could be delayed, which would harm our business and our
results of operations.
If we
experience interruptions in our manufacturing operations, our
business will suffer.
We currently manufacture our products at our York, Pennsylvania
facility, with no alternate facilities available. If we were to
experience a manufacturing disruption as a result of damage or
destruction of the building, equipment failure, acts of God or
other force majeure events, our ability to satisfy our
obligations to our customers would be adversely affected, which
would harm our business and our results of operations.
The
costs of raw materials have a significant impact on the level of
expenses that we incur. If the prices of raw materials and
related factors such as energy prices increase, and we cannot
pass those price increases on to our customers, our results of
operations and financial condition would suffer.
We use a number of raw materials including polymer plastics. The
prices of many of these raw materials, such as those sourced
from petroleum-based raw materials, are cyclical and volatile.
While we would generally attempt to pass along increased costs
to our customers in the form of sales price increases, we might
not be able to do so, for competitive or contract-related
reasons or otherwise. If we could not set our prices to reflect
the costs of our raw materials, our results of operations and
our financial condition would suffer.
29
Disruptions
in the supply of key raw materials and difficulties in the
supplier qualification process could adversely impact our
operations.
We employ a supply chain management strategy which seeks to
source components and materials from a number of established
third party companies. Where possible, we seek to establish dual
contracts for the supply of particular components or services.
However, there is a risk that our supply lines may be
interrupted in the event of a supplier production problem,
material recall or financial difficulties. If one of our
suppliers is unable to supply materials required for production
of our products or our strategies for managing these risks are
unsuccessful, we may be unable to complete the production of
sufficient quantities of product to fulfill customer orders, or
complete the qualification of new replacement materials for some
programs in time to meet future production requirements.
Prolonged disruptions in the supply of any of our key raw
materials, difficulty in completing qualification of new sources
of supply, or in implementing the use of replacement materials
or new sources of supply, could have a material adverse effect
on our results of operations, our financial condition or cash
flows.
Some
companies we may utilize for the supply of components are also
competitors, and they could elect to cease supply relationships
with us in the future for competitive reasons.
Some companies we may utilize for the supply of components for
the Unifill syringe also develop and market their own safety
products which can be attached onto standard prefilled syringes.
These companies may elect to cease supply relationships with us
in the future for competitive reasons. This may disrupt our
supply chain, cause difficulties in the qualification of new
sources of supply and impair our ability to supply customer
orders. Such events may have a material adverse effect on our
results of operations, our financial condition or cash flows.
The
medical device industry is very competitive.
Competition in the medical device industry is intense. We face
this competition from a wide range of companies. These include
large medical device companies, most of which have greater
financial and human resources, distribution channels and sales
and marketing capabilities than we do. Our ability to compete
effectively depends upon our ability to distinguish our company
and our products from our competitors and their products.
Factors affecting our competitive position include, for example,
product design and performance, product safety, sales, marketing
and distribution capabilities, success and timing of new product
development and introductions and intellectual property
protection.
We are
subject to extensive regulation.
We are subject to extensive regulation by the FDA pursuant to
the FDC Act, by comparable agencies in other countries, and by
other regulatory agencies and governing bodies. Our products
must receive clearance or approval from the FDA or counterpart
non-U.S. regulatory
agencies before they can be marketed or sold.
The process for obtaining marketing approval or clearance may
take a significant period of time and require the expenditure of
substantial resources. The process may also require changes to
our products or result in limitations on the indicated uses of
the products. As a result, our expectations with respect to
marketing approval or clearance may prove to be inaccurate and
we may not be able to obtain marketing approval or clearance in
a timely manner or at all. In addition, regulatory requirements
outside the U.S. change frequently, requiring prompt action
to maintain compliance, particularly when product modifications
are required. Following the introduction of a product, these
agencies also periodically review our manufacturing processes
and product performance. Our failure to comply with the
applicable good manufacturing practices, adverse event
reporting, clinical trial and other requirements of these
agencies could delay or prevent the production, marketing or
sale of our products and result in fines, delays or suspensions
of regulatory clearances, closure of manufacturing sites,
seizures or recalls of products and damage to our reputation.
The
FDA 510(k) clearance or premarket approval processes may impact
our ability to market and sell our products.
Before a new medical device, or a significant change involving a
new use of or claim for an existing medical device, can be
distributed commercially in the United States, it must receive
either 510(k) clearance or premarket
30
approval from the FDA, unless an exemption exists. Either
process can be expensive and lengthy. We have received 510(k)
clearance that covered the production of our Unitract 1mL
syringe by a contractor outside the United States as well as at
our Pennsylvania manufacturing facility. Our Unifill syringe
does not require 510(k) clearance because it will be sold to
drug manufacturers for use as drug packaging. The FDA may,
however, revise existing regulations or adopt additional
regulations, each of which could prevent or delay 510(k)
clearance or premarket approval of our new or modified devices,
or could impact our ability to market our currently cleared
devices. The FDA, for example, has recently announced its
intention to review the 510(k) process and consider enhancements
that could impact future 510(k) submissions. It has also
encouraged manufacturers to consult with the FDA as to the
appropriate 510(k) clearance process for any new product. Such
changes could result in additional scrutiny by the FDA of 510(k)
applications that we will submit for our new or modified devices
and could result in delays and increased costs in obtaining FDA
clearances, which could materially impact our business,
financial condition and results of operations.
We also may be required to obtain either 510(k) clearance or
premarket approval from the FDA for some of our new advanced
drug delivery systems. Obtaining such FDA clearances could
result in delays in bringing these new advanced drug delivery
systems to market and could materially impact our business,
financial condition and results of operations.
We may
face significant uncertainty in the industry due to government
healthcare reform.
The healthcare industry in the United States is subject to
fundamental changes due to the ongoing healthcare reform and the
political, economic and regulatory influences. In March 2010,
comprehensive healthcare reform legislation was signed into law
in the United States through the passage of the Patient
Protection and Affordable Health Care Act and the Health Care
and Education Reconciliation Act. Among other initiatives, the
legislation provides for a 2.3% annual excise tax on the sales
of certain medical devices in the United States, commencing in
January 2013. This enacted excise tax may adversely affect our
operating expenses and results of operations. In addition,
various healthcare reform proposals have also emerged at the
state level. We cannot predict with certainty what healthcare
initiatives, if any, will be implemented at the state level, or
what ultimate effect of federal healthcare reform or any future
legislation or regulation may have on us or on our
customers purchasing decisions regarding our products and
services.
We are
subject to regulation by governments around the world, and if
these regulations are not complied with, existing and future
operations may be curtailed, and we could be subject to
liability.
The design, development, manufacturing, marketing and labeling
of our products are subject to regulation by governmental
authorities in the United States, Europe and other countries,
including the FDA. The regulatory process can result in required
modification or withdrawal of existing products and a
substantial delay in the introduction of new products. Also, it
is possible that regulatory approval may not be obtained for a
new product. Our business may be adversely affected by changes
in the regulation of drug products and medical devices.
Our target pharmaceutical customers are also subject to
government regulations for the manufacturing, approval,
marketing and labeling of therapeutic drug products. An effect
of the governmental regulation of our customers drug
products and manufacturing processes is that compliance with
regulations makes it costly and time consuming to transition to
the use of our devices for existing products, or to secure
approval for pipeline products targeted for use with our
devices. If regulation of our customers products
incorporating our devices increases over time, it is likely that
this would adversely affect our sales and profitability.
Product
defects could adversely affect the results of our
operations.
The design, manufacture and marketing of medical devices involve
certain inherent risks. Manufacturing or design defects,
unanticipated use of our products, or inadequate disclosure of
risks relating to the use of the product can lead to injury or
other adverse events. These events could lead to recalls or
safety alerts relating to our products (either voluntary or
required by the FDA or similar governmental authorities in other
countries), and could result, in certain cases, in the removal
of a product from the market. Any recall could result in
significant costs, as well as negative publicity and damage to
our reputation that could reduce demand for our products.
Personal injuries
31
relating to the use of our products can also result in product
liability claims being brought against us. In some
circumstances, such adverse events could also cause delays in
new product approvals.
We may
be sued for product liability, which could adversely affect our
business.
The design, manufacture and marketing of medical devices carries
a significant risk of product liability claims. We may be held
liable if any product we develop and commercialize causes injury
or is found otherwise unsuitable during product testing,
manufacturing, marketing, sale or consumer use. In addition, the
safety studies we must perform and the regulatory approvals
required to commercialize our medical safety products will not
protect us from any such liability. We carry product liability
insurance. However, if there were to be product liability claims
against us, our insurance may be insufficient to cover the
expense of defending against such claims, or may be insufficient
to pay or settle such claims. Furthermore, we may be unable to
obtain adequate product liability insurance coverage for
commercial sales of any of our approved products. If such
insurance is insufficient to protect us, our results of
operations will suffer. If any product liability claim is made
against us, our reputation and future sales will be damaged,
even if we have adequate insurance coverage. We also intend to
seek product liability insurance for any approved products that
we may develop or acquire in the future. There is no guarantee
that such coverage will be available when we seek it or at a
reasonable cost to us.
We may
be unable to protect our intellectual property rights or may
infringe on the intellectual property rights of
others.
Our success depends in part on our ability to obtain and
maintain protection in the United States and other countries of
the intellectual property relating to or incorporated into our
technology and products. Our issued patents expire at various
dates between 2018 and 2030. Our pending and future patent
applications may not issue as patents or, if issued, may not
issue in a form that will provide us with any competitive
advantage or adequate protection. In particular, the advanced
drug delivery systems which we are developing and for which we
have filed patent applications are relatively new inventions,
and we cannot be sure that we will be able to obtain patents on
these inventions. Our issued and future patents may be
challenged, narrowed, invalidated or circumvented, which could
limit our ability to stop competitors from marketing similar
products or limit the length of terms of patent protection we
may have for our products. Changes in patent laws or their
interpretation in the United States and other countries could
also diminish the value of our intellectual property or narrow
the scope of our patent protection. In addition, the legal
systems of certain countries do not favor the aggressive
enforcement of patents, and the laws of foreign countries may
not protect our rights to the same extent as the laws of the
United States. As a result, our patent portfolio may not provide
us with sufficient rights to exclude others from commercializing
products similar or identical to ours. In order to preserve and
enforce our patent and other intellectual property rights, we
may need to make claims or file lawsuits against third parties.
This can entail significant costs to us and divert our
managements attention from developing and commercializing
our products.
There also can be no assurance that third parties will not
assert that our products infringe their patent or other
intellectual property rights. Any claims, with or without merit,
could be time-consuming, result in costly litigation, divert the
efforts of our technical and management personnel or require us
to pay substantial damages. If we are unsuccessful in defending
ourselves against these types of claims, we may be required to
do one or more of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
stop, delay or abandon our ongoing or planned commercialization
of the product that is the subject of the suit;
|
|
|
|
attempt to obtain a license to sell or use the relevant
technology or substitute technology, which license may not be
available on reasonable terms or at all;
|
|
|
|
redesign those products that use the relevant technology; or
|
|
|
|
pay substantial damages which could adversely impact our
financial condition and ability to execute our business plan and
operations.
|
32
If we
are unable to protect the confidentiality of our proprietary
information and know-how, the value of our technology and
products could be adversely affected.
In addition to patented technology, we rely on our unpatented
proprietary technology, trade secrets, processes and know-how.
We generally seek to protect this information by confidentiality
agreements with our employees, consultants, scientific advisors
and third parties. These agreements may be breached, and we may
not have adequate remedies for any such breach. In addition, our
trade secrets may otherwise become known or be independently
developed by competitors. To the extent that our employees,
consultants or contractors use intellectual property owned by
others in their work for us, disputes may arise as to the rights
in related or resulting know-how and inventions.
Impairment
of our goodwill, which represents a significant portion of our
total assets, would adversely affect our operating results and
we may never realize the full value of our
goodwill.
As of June 30, 2011, we had $13.3 million of goodwill
on our balance sheet, which represented 15% of our total assets.
We recorded this goodwill primarily from our historical
acquisition activities. Goodwill is subject to, at a minimum, an
annual impairment assessment of its carrying value. Any material
impairment of our goodwill would likely have a material adverse
impact on our results of operations.
Fluctuations
in foreign currency exchange rates could adversely affect our
financial condition and results of operations.
Currently, the majority of our revenues have been derived from
payments under our industrialization agreement with Sanofi which
provides that Sanofi will pay us in euros, while we incur most
of our operating expenses in U.S. dollars or Australian
dollars. Changes in foreign currency exchange rates can affect
the value of our assets and liabilities, and the amount of our
revenues and expenses. We do not currently try to mitigate our
exposure to currency exchange rate risks by using hedging
transactions. We cannot predict future changes in foreign
currency exchange rates, and as a result, we may suffer losses
as a result of future fluctuations.
Risk
Factors Related to Our Shares of Common Stock
The
trading price of our shares of common stock may fluctuate
significantly.
The price of our shares of common stock may be volatile, which
means that it could decline substantially within a short period
of time. The trading price of the shares may fluctuate, and
investors may experience a decrease in the value of the shares
that they hold, sometimes regardless of our operating
performance or prospects. The trading price of our common stock
could fluctuate significantly for many reasons, including the
following:
|
|
|
|
|
future announcements concerning our business and that of our
competitors including in particular, the progress of our
commercial sales for the Unifill syringe and the development
programs for the other advanced drug delivery devices;
|
|
|
|
regulatory developments, enforcement actions bearing on
advertising, marketing or sales of our current or pipeline
products;
|
|
|
|
quarterly variations in operating results;
|
|
|
|
introduction of new products or changes in product pricing
policies by us or our competitors;
|
|
|
|
acquisition or loss of significant customers, distributors or
suppliers;
|
|
|
|
business acquisitions or divestitures;
|
|
|
|
changes in third party reimbursement practices;
|
|
|
|
fluctuations of investor interest in the medical device
sector; and
|
|
|
|
fluctuations in the economy, world political events or general
market conditions.
|
33
If
there are substantial sales of our shares of common stock, our
share price could decline.
As of September 1, 2011, we had 64,058,508 shares of
common stock outstanding. All of those shares of common stock
other than 5,204,945 shares held by our affiliates are
freely tradable under the Securities Act. Shares held by our
affiliates are eligible for resale pursuant to Rule 144. If
our stockholders sell a large number of shares of common stock
the public market perceives that our stockholders might sell a
large number of shares, the prices at which our common stock
trades could decline significantly.
In addition, as of September 1, 2011,
13,069,398 shares of our common stock are subject to
outstanding stock options and warrants. We have registered the
shares issuable upon the exercise of options granted under our
2009 Stock Incentive Plan. In addition, we have effective
registration statements covering the resale of shares of our
common stock that are issuable upon the exercise of our
remaining options and warrants. If these options and warrants
are exercised and the holders choose to sell their shares, it
could have an adverse effect on the market price for our common
stock.
We do
not intend to pay cash dividends in the foreseeable
future.
For the foreseeable future, we do not intend to declare or pay
any dividends on our common stock. We intend to retain our
earnings, if any, to finance the development and expansion of
our business and product lines. Any future decision to declare
or pay dividends will be made by our board of directors and will
depend upon a number of factors including our financial
condition and results of operations. In addition, under our
current bank financing agreements, we are not permitted to pay
cash dividends without the prior written consent of the lender.
We may
be subject to arbitrage risks.
Investors may seek to profit by exploiting the difference, if
any, in the price of our shares of common stock on the Nasdaq
and our CDIs on the ASX. Such arbitrage activities could cause
our stock price in the market with the higher value to decrease
to the price set by the market with the lower value.
Our
certificate of incorporation, bylaws, the Delaware General
Corporation Law and the terms of our industrialization agreement
with Sanofi may delay or deter a change of control
transaction.
Certain provisions of our certificate of incorporation and
bylaws may have the effect of deterring takeovers, such as those
provisions authorizing our board of directors to issue, from
time to time, any series of preferred stock and fix the
designation, powers, preferences and rights of the shares of
such series of preferred stock; prohibiting stockholders from
acting by written consent in lieu of a meeting; requiring
advance notice of stockholder intention to put forth director
nominees or bring up other business at a stockholders
meeting; prohibiting stockholders from calling a special meeting
of stockholders; requiring a
662/3%
majority stockholder approval in order for stockholders to amend
our bylaws or adopt new bylaws; and providing that, subject to
the rights of preferred shares, the number of directors is to be
fixed exclusively by our board of directors. Section 203 of
the Delaware General Corporation Law, from which we did not
elect to opt out, provides that if a holder acquires 15% or more
of our stock without prior approval of our board of directors,
that holder will be subject to certain restrictions on its
ability to acquire us within three years. In addition, our
industrialization agreement with Sanofi provides to Sanofi the
right to match a change of control proposal and to terminate the
industrialization agreement under certain circumstances of a
change of control event. See Business
Commercial Relationships Sanofi. These
provisions may delay or deter a change of control of us, and
could limit the price that investors might be willing to pay in
the future for shares of our common stock.
|
|
Item 1B.
|
Unresolved
Staff Comments
|
None.
34
Our 165,000 square foot global headquarters and
manufacturing facility is located on 38 acres of land in
York, Pennsylvania. The facility includes 110,000 square
feet of production space and 54,000 square feet of office
space. The property is subject to a mortgage held by a local
bank.
We also have a short term lease for office space in Radnor,
Pennsylvania to support our research and development activities.
We also lease 1,100 square feet of office space in Sydney,
Australia which is used for certain finance and administrative
operations.
|
|
Item 3.
|
Legal
Proceedings
|
In the ordinary course of our business, we may be subject to
various claims, pending and potential legal actions for damages,
investigations relating to governmental laws and regulations and
other matters arising out of the normal conduct of our business.
We are not aware of any material pending legal proceedings to
which we or any of our subsidiaries is a party or of which any
of our properties is the subject.
|
|
Item 4.
|
Removed
and Reserved
|
|
|
Item 5.
|
Market
for Registrants Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters
and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
|
Market
Information
Commencing February 16, 2010, our shares of common stock
began trading on the Nasdaq Global Market under the symbol
UNIS. Our shares of common stock have also traded in
the form of CHESS Depositary Interests (CDIs), each
CDI representing one-sixth of a share of our common stock, on
the Australian Securities Exchange (ASX) under the
symbol UNS since January 18, 2010. Prior to
that date, the ordinary shares of our predecessor Unilife
Medical Solutions Limited (UMSL) were traded on the
ASX under the symbol UNI.
The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, the
high and low closing prices for our common stock on the Nasdaq
Global Market (commencing February 16, 2010), the high and
low closing prices for our CDIs on the ASX (from
January 18, 2010 through February 15, 2010) and
the high and low closing prices for the ordinary shares of UMSL
(prior to January 18, 2010). The prices of our CDIs (and
previously ordinary shares of UMSL) have been adjusted to give
effect to the six for one exchange ratio and have been converted
to U.S. dollars using the exchange rate on the last day of
each respective quarter.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period
|
|
High
|
|
Low
|
|
|
(US$)
|
|
(US$)
|
|
Fiscal Year 2011:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter
|
|
|
6.30
|
|
|
|
4.61
|
|
Second Quarter
|
|
|
6.25
|
|
|
|
5.24
|
|
Third Quarter
|
|
|
5.89
|
|
|
|
4.15
|
|
Fourth Quarter
|
|
|
5.86
|
|
|
|
4.24
|
|
Fiscal Year 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter
|
|
|
7.20
|
|
|
|
1.62
|
|
Second Quarter
|
|
|
6.30
|
|
|
|
4.68
|
|
Third Quarter
|
|
|
17.90
|
|
|
|
5.04
|
|
Fourth Quarter
|
|
|
8.04
|
|
|
|
5.28
|
|
Holders
As of September 1, 2011, we had 64,058,508 shares of
common stock outstanding, and there were 278 holders of record
of our common stock, including Chess Depositary Nominees which
held shares of our common stock on behalf of 8,429 CDI holders.
The closing sales price for our common stock on
September 1, 2011 was $4.34 as reported by the Nasdaq
Global Market.
35
Dividends
We currently intend to retain any earnings to finance research
and development and the operation and expansion of our business
and do not anticipate paying any cash dividends for the
foreseeable future. The declaration and payment of any dividends
in the future by us will be subject to the sole discretion of
our board of directors and will depend upon many factors,
including our financial condition, earnings, capital
requirements of our operating subsidiaries, covenants associated
with certain of our debt obligations, legal requirements,
regulatory constraints and other factors deemed relevant by our
board of directors. Moreover, if we determine to pay any
dividend in the future, there can be no assurance that we will
continue to pay such dividends. In addition, under our bank
financing agreements, we are not permitted to pay cash dividends
without the prior written consent of the lender.
Performance
Graph
The performance graph shown below compares the change in
cumulative total shareholder return on shares of common stock
with the Nasdaq Stock Market Index (US) and the NASDAQ Health
Care Index (US) from February 16, 2010, our first day of
trading on the Nasdaq Global Market, through our fiscal
2011 year ended June 30, 2011. The graph sets the
beginning value of shares of common stock and the indices at
$100, and assumes that all quarterly dividends were reinvested
at the time of payment. This graph does not forecast future
performance of shares of common stock.
|
|
Item 6.
|
Selected
Financial Data
|
The following table presents our selected consolidated financial
data as of and for each of the years in the five year period
ended June 30, 2011. The statements of operations data for
the years ended June 30, 2011, 2010 and 2009 and the
balance sheet data as of June 30, 2011 and 2010 have been
derived from our audited consolidated financial statements
included elsewhere in this Annual Report on
Form 10-K.
All such data should be read in conjunction with the information
under Managements Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations, and our
consolidated financial statements and the related notes thereto
included elsewhere in this report. The statements of operations
data for the year ended June 30, 2008 and 2007 and the
balance sheet data as of June 30, 2009, 2008 and 2007 have
been derived from our audited consolidated financial statements
not included in this Annual Report on
Form 10-K.
Historical results are not necessarily indicative of the results
to be expected in the future.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except share data)
|
|
|
Statements of Operations Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues(a)
|
|
$
|
6,650
|
|
|
$
|
11,422
|
|
|
$
|
19,976
|
|
|
$
|
3,500
|
|
|
$
|
2,070
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
(40,682
|
)
|
|
|
(29,748
|
)
|
|
|
(517
|
)
|
|
|
(8,537
|
)
|
|
|
(8,969
|
)
|
Basic and diluted loss per share
|
|
|
(0.70
|
)
|
|
|
(0.64
|
)
|
|
|
(0.02
|
)
|
|
|
(0.26
|
)
|
|
|
(0.38
|
)
|
Balance Sheet Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of June 30,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
89,478
|
|
|
$
|
64,817
|
|
|
$
|
32,212
|
|
|
$
|
18,499
|
|
|
$
|
16,926
|
|
Long-term debt, including current portion
|
|
|
22,687
|
|
|
|
2,741
|
|
|
|
3,133
|
|
|
|
7,209
|
|
|
|
4,261
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Includes $3.9 million, $8.9 million and
$16.1 million in connection with our exclusive licensing
agreement and our industrialization agreement with Sanofi in the
years ended June 30, 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively. |
|
|
Item 7.
|
Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations
|
The following discussion and analysis of our financial
condition and results of operations should be read in
conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and
related notes appearing elsewhere in this Annual Report on
Form 10-K.
This discussion and analysis includes certain forward-looking
statements that involve risks, uncertainties and assumptions.
You should review the Risk Factors section of this
Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for a discussion of important factors that could cause actual
results to differ materially from the results described in or
implied by such forward-looking statements. See Cautionary
Note Regarding Forward-Looking Information at the
beginning of this report. References to our fiscal year refer to
the fiscal year ending June 30.
Redomiciliation
On January 27, 2010, Unilife Medical Solutions Limited, an
Australian corporation (UMSL), completed a
redomiciliation from Australia to the State of Delaware pursuant
to which stockholders and option holders of UMSL exchanged their
interests in UMSL for equivalent interests in Unilife
Corporation, a Delaware corporation (Unilife) and
Unilife became the parent company of UMSL and its subsidiaries.
The redomiciliation was conducted by way of schemes of
arrangement under Australian law. The issuance of Unilife common
stock and stock options under the schemes of arrangement was
exempt from registration under Section 3(a)(10) of the
Securities Act of 1933, as amended. The redomiciliation was
approved by the Australian Federal Court, and approved by UMSL
shareholders and option holders.
In connection with the redomiciliation, holders of UMSL ordinary
shares or share options received one share of Unilife common
stock or an option to purchase one share of Unilife common
stock, for every six UMSL ordinary shares or share options,
respectively, held by such holders, unless the holder elected to
receive in lieu of Unilife common stock, Chess Depositary
Interests of Unilife, or CDIs (each representing one-sixth of
one share of Unilife common stock), in which case such holder
received one CDI for every UMSL ordinary share. All share and
per share amounts in this Annual Report on
Form 10-K
have been restated to reflect the one for six share
recapitalization effected in connection with the redomiciliation.
On February 16, 2010, Unilifes common stock began
trading on the Nasdaq Global Market under the symbol
UNIS.
Overview
We are a U.S. based developer and manufacturer of a
diversified portfolio of advanced drug delivery systems. We
collaborate with pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies
seeking to optimize drug lifecycles and generate differentiation
for their brand in competitive therapeutic markets through the
use of innovative devices that can improve patient care, protect
healthcare workers and prevent disease. We have developed a
broad portfolio of drug delivery systems in direct response to
unmet market needs for injectable drugs including macromolecule
biologics.
Our main product is the Unifill
ready-to-fill
syringe, which is designed to be supplied to pharmaceutical
manufacturers in a form that is ready for filling with their
injectable drugs and vaccines. We have a strategic partnership
with Sanofi, a large global pharmaceutical company, pursuant to
which Sanofi has paid us a 10.0 million euros exclusivity
fee and has paid us 17.0 million euros to fund our
industrialization program for the Unifill syringe. We are also
in discussions with other pharmaceutical companies that are
seeking to obtain access to the Unifill syringe.
37
In addition, we manufacture our Unitract 1mL insulin syringes at
our FDA-registered manufacturing facility in Pennsylvania, which
are designed for primarily for use in healthcare facilities and
by patients who self-administer prescription medication such as
insulin.
Recent
Developments
Equipment
Lease Agreement
On August 15, 2011, we entered into a Master Lease
Agreement with Varilease Finance, Inc. (Varilease).
Under the Master Lease Agreement, Varilease will provide up to
$10.0 million of lease financing for production equipment
for the Unifill
ready-to-fill
syringe. We have the option of selling and leasing back existing
equipment or using the facility to lease additional equipment.
Under the terms of the Master Lease Agreement, we will lease the
equipment from Varilease for a two-year base term, and we will
pay rent in equal monthly installments of up to
$0.4 million over the base term.
The Master Lease Agreement contains covenants and provisions for
events of default customarily found in lease agreements. We may
prepay the monthly rent payments without penalty. At the end of
the lease term, we have the option to extend the lease, return
the equipment or purchase the equipment, as defined in the
agreement.
Critical
Accounting Policies and Estimates
We prepare our consolidated financial statements in accordance
with accounting principles generally accepted in the United
States of America. This requires management to make certain
estimates, judgments and assumptions that could affect the
amounts reported in the consolidated financial statements and
accompanying notes. The following accounting policies require
significant estimates, judgments and assumptions.
Goodwill
Goodwill is the excess of purchase price over the fair value of
net assets acquired in business acquisitions. Goodwill is
subject to, at a minimum, an annual impairment assessment of its
carrying value. Additional impairment assessments would be
performed if events and circumstances warranted such additional
assessments during the year. Goodwill impairment is deemed to
exist if the net book value of our reporting unit exceeds its
estimated fair value. Estimated fair value of our reporting unit
is determined utilizing the value implied by our year end quoted
stock price. We did not record any goodwill impairments during
fiscal 2011, 2010 or 2009.
The Company has one reporting unit. The reporting unit is
comprised of our Unitract and Unifill syringe business, the base
technology which we obtained as part of our November 2002
acquisition of Unitract Syringe Pty Limited and the
manufacturing capability which we obtained in our January 2007
acquisition of Integrated BioSciences, Inc.
In estimating the reporting units fair value for purposes
of the Companys fiscal 2011 impairment assessment,
management compared the carrying value of our reporting unit to
our market capitalization as of June 30, 2011, which is our
annual impairment testing date. Our market capitalization of
$331.0 million, based on the quoted stock price on the
Nasdaq was in excess of our stockholders equity of
$53.6 million. Management also considered that market
capitalization through early September 2011 continued to be in
excess of the carrying value.
Share-Based
Compensation
We grant stock options, restricted stock and common stock as
compensation to our employees, directors and consultants.
Certain employee and director awards vest over stated vesting
periods and others also require achievement of specific
performance or market conditions. We expense the grant-date fair
value of awards to employees and directors over their respective
vesting periods. To the extent that employee and director awards
vest only upon the achievement of a specific performance
condition, expense is recognized over the period from the date
management determines that the performance condition is probable
of achievement through the date they are expected to be met.
Awards granted to consultants are sometimes granted for past
services, in which case their fair value is expensed on their
grant date, while other awards require future service, or the
achievement of performance or market conditions. Timing of
expense recognition for consultant awards is similar to that of
employee and director awards; however,
38
aggregate expense is re-measured each quarter end based on the
then fair value of the award through the vesting date of the
award. We estimate the fair value of stock options using the
Black-Scholes option-pricing model, with the exception of
market-based grants, which are valued based on Barrier and Monte
Carlo option-pricing models. Option pricing methods require the
input of highly subjective assumptions, including the expected
stock price volatility.
Revenue
Recognition
We recognize revenue from licensing fees, industrialization
efforts and products sales.
In June 2008, we entered into an exclusive licensing arrangement
to allow Sanofi to use certain of our intellectual property in
order and solely to develop in collaboration with us, our
Unifill syringe for use in and sale to the pre-filled syringe
market. The $10.0 million up-front, non-refundable fee paid
for this license is being amortized over the five year
expected life of the related agreement. In late fiscal 2009, we
entered into an industrialization agreement with Sanofi, under
which specific payment amounts and completion dates were
established for achievement of certain pre-defined milestones in
our development of the Unifill syringe. Revenue is recognized
upon achievement of the at risk milestone events,
which represents the culmination of the earnings process related
to such events. Milestones include specific phases of the
project such as product design, prototype availability, user
tests, manufacturing proof of principle and the various steps to
complete the industrialization of the product. Revenue
recognized is commensurate with the milestones achieved and we
have no future performance obligations related to previous
milestone payments as each milestone payment is non-refundable
when received.
We recognize revenue from sales of products at the time of
shipment and when title passes to the customer.
Results
of Operations
The following table summarizes our results of operations for the
fiscal years ended June 30, 2011, 2010 and 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(in thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
Revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Industrialization fees
|
|
$
|
1,350
|
|
|
$
|
6,318
|
|
|
$
|
13,601
|
|
Licensing fees
|
|
|
2,527
|
|
|
|
2,566
|
|
|
|
2,456
|
|
Product sales and other
|
|
|
2,773
|
|
|
|
2,538
|
|
|
|
3,919
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
|
6,650
|
|
|
|
11,422
|
|
|
|
19,976
|
|
Cost of product sales
|
|
|
2,597
|
|
|
|
2,471
|
|
|
|
3,426
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
4,053
|
|
|
|
8,951
|
|
|
|
16,550
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research and development
|
|
|
9,631
|
|
|
|
10,934
|
|
|
|
2,209
|
|
Selling, general and administrative
|
|
|
31,571
|
|
|
|
26,257
|
|
|
|
13,780
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
4,009
|
|
|
|
2,314
|
|
|
|
915
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
45,211
|
|
|
|
39,505
|
|
|
|
16,904
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating loss
|
|
|
(41,158
|
)
|
|
|
(30,554
|
)
|
|
|
(354
|
)
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
511
|
|
|
|
125
|
|
|
|
249
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
(399
|
)
|
|
|
(1,066
|
)
|
|
|
(361
|
)
|
Other (income) expense, net
|
|
|
(588
|
)
|
|
|
135
|
|
|
|
275
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
$
|
(40,682
|
)
|
|
$
|
(29,748
|
)
|
|
$
|
(517
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted loss per share
|
|
$
|
(0.70
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.64
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.02
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39
Fiscal
Year 2011 Compared to Fiscal Year 2010
Revenues. Revenues decreased by
$4.8 million or 42%. Revenues from our industrialization
agreement with Sanofi decreased from $6.3 million to
$1.4 million due to the achievement of a majority of the
related milestones during fiscal 2010. As of June 30, 2011,
there was one remaining milestone payment to be recognized which
was dependent upon the production of commercially viable units
of our Unifill syringe. This remaining milestone was achieved
during July 2011 and we received the related 1.0 million
euros during September 2011. Revenues from our exclusive
licensing agreement with Sanofi decreased from $2.6 million
to $2.5 million. We have recognized and will continue to
recognize revenue from the exclusive licensing agreement on a
straight-line basis over the remaining term of the agreement.
Since these revenues are based in euros, the $0.1 million
decrease resulted from fluctuations in foreign currency
translation rates. Revenues from product sales of our contract
manufacturing business increased from $2.5 million to
$2.8 million, primarily as a result of increased sales to
one of our most significant contract manufacturing customers
during the first and second quarters of fiscal 2011. We
discontinued contract manufacturing activities in December 2010
in order to focus our efforts on the Unifill syringe and our
additional drug delivery devices.
Cost of product sales. Cost of product sales
increased by $0.1 million or 5%, which was attributable to
a higher level of product sales under our contract manufacturing
sales activity. Our cost of product sales during fiscal 2011
includes amounts related to the write-off of obsolete inventory.
Research and development expenses. Research
and development expenses decreased by $1.3 million. During
fiscal 2010, we incurred a charge of $4.3 million in
connection with the issuance of 833,333 fully-vested shares of
common stock to certain employees in consideration of their
transfer to us of certain intellectual property rights. This
decrease was partially offset by an increase in expenditures
incurred to finalize the product specifications of our Unifill
syringe and develop our additional drug delivery devices.
Selling, general and administrative
expenses. Selling, general and administrative
expenses increased by $5.3 million or 20%. During fiscal
2011, we recorded $9.0 million of share-based compensation
expense, an increase of $3.3 million compared to fiscal
2010. Our share-based compensation expense during fiscal 2011
relates primarily to restricted stock and stock options issued
to new employees, directors and consultants under our 2009 Stock
Incentive Plan. Additionally, during fiscal 2010 and the first
half of fiscal 2011, we increased the workforce at our York,
Pennsylvania facility, and as a result, we incurred payroll
expenses and recruiting fees during the fiscal 2011 of
$11.0 million, an increase of $3.2 million compared to
fiscal 2010. These amounts were partially offset by a decrease
of $2.7 million in legal and consulting fees due to
significant costs incurred during fiscal 2010 in connection with
our redomiciliation to the United States.
Depreciation and amortization
expense. Depreciation and amortization expense
increased by $1.7 million or 73% which was attributable to
$4.0 million of machinery placed into service during
October 2009 relating to our 1mL syringe and the completion of
construction of our new headquarters and manufacturing facility.
Included in this amount is a $0.5 million loss on the
disposal of certain pieces of equipment during fiscal 2011. We
expect our depreciation and amortization expense to increase in
the future as a result of our purchases of machinery for the
Unifill syringe.
Interest expense. Interest expense increased
by $0.4 million, primarily as a result of interest related
to our $18.0 million in debt financing obtained in October
2010 for the construction of our new headquarters and
manufacturing facility.
Interest income. Interest income decreased by
$0.7 million, primarily as a result of lower cash balances
and lower interest rates during fiscal 2011.
Other (income) expense. Other income during
fiscal 2011 includes the receipt of a $0.5 million
opportunity grant from the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania.
Net loss and loss per share. Net loss for
fiscal 2011 and 2010 was $40.7 million and
$29.7 million, respectively. Basic and diluted loss per
share was $0.70 and $0.64, respectively, on weighted average
shares outstanding of 57,891,024 and 46,837,066, respectively.
The increase in the weighted average shares outstanding
40
was primarily due to the issuance of common stock in connection
with our October 2009 and December 2010 equity financings.
Fiscal
Year 2010 Compared to Fiscal Year 2009
Revenues. Revenues decreased by
$8.6 million or 43%. Revenues from our industrialization
agreement with Sanofi decreased from $13.6 million to
$6.3 million due to the nature and timing of milestones
achieved during fiscal 2010. Revenues from our exclusive
licensing agreement with Sanofi increased from $2.5 million
to $2.6 million. We have recognized and will continue to
recognize the revenue from the exclusive licensing agreement on
a straight-line basis over the remaining term of the agreement.
Since these revenues are based in euros, the $0.1 million
variation in revenues results from fluctuations in foreign
currency translation rates. Revenues from product sales of our
contract manufacturing business decreased from $3.9 million
to $2.5 million principally because most of our efforts
were devoted to the development of the Unifill syringe in fiscal
2010.
Cost of product sales. Cost of sales decreased
by $1.0 million or 28%. The decrease was attributable to a
reduction in product sales under our contract manufacturing
sales activity.
Research and development expenses. Research
and development expenses increased by $8.7 million,
primarily as a result of $4.3 million incurred in
connection with the issuance of 833,333 fully-vested shares of
common stock to certain employees in consideration of their
transfer to us of certain intellectual property rights. The
increase was also a result of additional expenditures to
finalize the product specifications of our Unifill syringe.
Selling, general and administrative
expenses. Selling, general and administrative
expenses increased by $12.5 million or 91%. During fiscal
2010, we increased the workforce at our Pennsylvania facility,
and as a result, we incurred payroll expenses and recruiting
fees during fiscal 2010 of $7.8 million, an increase of
$4.1 million compared to fiscal 2009. Additionally, during
fiscal 2010, we incurred legal and consulting fees of
$6.4 million, an increase of $3.4 million compared to
fiscal 2009. The increase was due primarily to expenses we
incurred related to our redomiciliation and Nasdaq listing.
Additionally, during fiscal 2010, we recorded $5.7 million
in share-based compensation expense, an increase of
$2.7 million compared to fiscal 2009. Our share-based
compensation expense during fiscal 2010 relates primarily to
restricted stock and stock options issued to employees and
consultants during the year. Our share-based compensation
expense during fiscal 2009 included $1.5 million recorded
in December 2008 for the issuance of 1.7 million shares of
common stock to our Chief Executive Officer.
Depreciation and amortization
expense. Depreciation and amortization expense
increased by $1.4 million or 153% which was primarily
attributable to $1.0 million of property plant and
equipment additions placed in service during fiscal 2010.
Additionally, during October 2009, we placed $4.0 million
of machinery to manufacture our 1mL syringe in service.
Interest expense. Interest expense decreased
by $0.1 million, primarily as a result of our lower levels
of outstanding debt.
Interest income. Interest income increased by
$0.7 million, primarily as a result of higher cash balances
during fiscal 2010.
Other (income) expense. Other (income) expense
decreased by $0.1 million primarily due to lower foreign
exchange losses as a result of the appreciation of the
U.S. dollar against the Australian dollar.
Net loss and loss per share. Net loss for
fiscal 2010 and 2009 was $29.7 million and
$0.5 million, respectively. Basic and diluted loss per
share was $0.64 and $0.02, respectively, on weighted average
shares outstanding of 46,837,066 and 34,426,353, respectively.
The increase in the weighted average shares outstanding was
primarily due to the issuance of common stock in connection with
our October 2009 equity financing.
Liquidity
and Capital Resources
To date, we have funded our operations primarily from a
combination of equity issuances, borrowings under our bank loans
and payments from Sanofi under our exclusive licensing and
industrialization agreements. As of June 30, 2011, cash and
cash equivalents were $17.9 million, restricted cash was
$2.4 million and our long-term debt was $22.7 million.
As of June 30, 2010, cash and cash equivalents were
$20.8 million and our long-term debt
41
was $2.7 million. During September 2011, we received
1.0 million euros from Sanofi related to the achievement of
the final milestone under the industrialization agreement.
During October 2010, we secured $18.0 million of external
financing from Metro Bank (Metro) for the
construction of our new manufacturing facility. We used
$6.9 million of the proceeds to repay amounts borrowed in
August 2010 under our credit agreement with Univest.
During December 2010, we received $2.25 million from the
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania in low-interest financing for land
and the construction of our new corporate headquarters and
manufacturing facility.
During December 2010 we raised $33.4 million, net of
issuance costs, through a private placement and share purchase
plan for our Australian and New Zealand stockholders.
During August 2011 we entered into an equipment lease which will
provide for up to $10.0 million of additional external
financing.
We believe that our cash and cash equivalents on hand are
sufficient to sustain planned operations through the third
quarter of fiscal 2012.
Our recurring losses from operations raise substantial doubt
about our ability to continue as a going concern. We anticipate
incurring additional losses until such time that we can generate
significant revenue from product sales.
The following table summarizes our cash flows during the fiscal
years ended June 30, 2011, 2010 and 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended June 30,
|
|
|
2011
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating activities
|
|
$
|
(28,521
|
)
|
|
$
|
(12,390
|
)
|
|
$
|
6,795
|
|
Investing activities
|
|
|
(30,037
|
)
|
|
|
(18,132
|
)
|
|
|
(2,912
|
)
|
Financing activities
|
|
|
53,838
|
|
|
|
49,488
|
|
|
|
(3,265
|
)
|
Fiscal
Year 2011 Compared to Fiscal Year 2010
Net Cash
Used in Operating Activities
Net cash used in operating activities during fiscal 2011 was
$28.5 million compared to $12.4 million during fiscal
2010. The decrease in cash flow was primarily due to
$10.3 million of higher net loss after adding back
depreciation and amortization, loss on disposal of property,
plant and equipment and share-based compensation expense.
Net Cash
Used in Investing Activities
Net cash used in investing activities during fiscal 2011 was
$30.0 million, primarily as a result of construction costs
incurred in connection with our new headquarters and
manufacturing facility, as well as costs incurred in connection
with the purchase of machinery and related equipment.
Net Cash
Provided by Financing Activities
Net cash provided by financing activities during fiscal 2011 was
$53.8 million compared to $49.5 million during fiscal
2010. During fiscal 2011, we received $33.4 million from
the issuance of common stock in connection with our December
2010 private placement and share purchase plan, as well as
$3.2 million upon the exercise of stock options.
Additionally, during fiscal 2011, we received $20.2 million
in aggregate proceeds from our external financing from Metro and
the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. During fiscal 2010, we
received $47.1 million in connection with our October 2009
private placement and share purchase plan, as well as
$2.3 million upon the exercise of stock options.
42
Fiscal
Year 2010 Compared to Fiscal Year 2009
Net Cash
(Used in) Provided by Operating Activities
Net cash used in operating activities during fiscal 2010 was
$12.4 million compared to net cash provided by operating
activities of $6.8 million during fiscal 2009. The decrease
in cash flow was primarily due to $20.8 million of higher
net loss after adding back depreciation and amortization and
share-based compensation expense.
Net Cash
Used in Investing Activities
Net cash used in investing activities was $18.1 million
during fiscal 2010, primarily as a result of $17.6 million
of costs incurred in connection with the purchase of machinery
related to the lines for our Unifill syringe as well as the
purchase of the land and construction costs in connection with
our new headquarters and manufacturing facility.
Net Cash
Provided by (Used in) Financing Activities
Net cash provided by financing activities during fiscal 2010 was
$49.5 million compared to net cash used in financing
activities of $3.3 million during fiscal 2009. During
fiscal 2010, we received $47.1 million from the issuance of
common stock related to our private placement and share purchase
plan, and $2.3 million upon the exercise of stock options.
During fiscal 2009, we elected to terminate a licensing
agreement that we determined was no longer consistent with our
business strategies, and, as a final settlement, we repaid
$2.3 million of the $3.0 million that we had
originally received in 2008 under the licensing agreement, while
retaining $0.7 million to cover related legal fees.
Contractual
Obligations
The following table provides information regarding our
contractual obligations as of June 30, 2011:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments Due by Period
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less Than
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
More Than
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
1 Year
|
|
|
1-3 Years
|
|
|
3-5 Years
|
|
|
5 Years
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Long-term debt and related interest
|
|
$
|
32,835
|
|
|
$
|
2,091
|
|
|
$
|
4,166
|
|
|
$
|
3,983
|
|
|
$
|
22,595
|
|
Capital leases
|
|
|
209
|
|
|
|
91
|
|
|
|
93
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating leases
|
|
|
112
|
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total contractual obligations
|
|
$
|
33,156
|
|
|
$
|
2,242
|
|
|
$
|
4,306
|
|
|
$
|
4,013
|
|
|
$
|
22,595
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our term loans bear interest at rates ranging from prime (3.25%
as of June 30, 2011) plus 1.50% to 6.0%. The future
contractual obligations for interest is based upon rates in this
range.
Off-Balance
Sheet Arrangements
We do not have any off-balance sheet arrangements as such term
is defined in the SEC rules.
Recently
Issued Accounting Pronouncements
In March 2010, the Financial Accounting Standards Board
(FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update
(ASU)
2010-17,
Milestone Method of Revenue Recognition, a consensus of
the FASB Emerging Issues Task Force (Issue
No. 08-9).
(ASU
2010-17).
ASU 2010-17
provides guidance about the criteria that must be met to use the
milestone method of revenue recognition. This ASU is effective
for milestones achieved in fiscal years and interim periods
within those years, beginning after June 15, 2010. We
adopted ASU
2010-17 on
July 1, 2010 and its adoption did not have a material
impact on our consolidated financial statements.
In June 2011, the FASB issued ASU
2011-05,
Comprehensive Income (ASU
2011-05).
ASU 2011-05
removes certain presentation options and requires entities to
report components of net income and comprehensive income in
either one continuous statement of comprehensive income or two
separate but consecutive statements. There is no change to the
items that are reported in other comprehensive income. ASU
2011-05 is
effective for
43
annual and interim periods beginning after December 15,
2011. Other than additional presentation of other comprehensive
loss outside of the statements of stockholders equity and
comprehensive loss, the adoption of ASU
2011-05 will
not have an impact on our consolidated financial statements.
|
|
Item 7A.
|
Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
|
We are exposed to market risk from changes in interest rates and
foreign currency exchange rates. Changes in these factors could
cause fluctuations in our results of operations and cash flows.
Interest
Rate Risk
Our exposure to interest rate risk is limited to our cash and
cash equivalents that are invested in money market funds with
highly liquid short term investments and our variable interest
rate term loans. We currently do not utilize derivative
instruments to mitigate changes in interest rates.
Foreign
Currency Exchange Rate Fluctuations
Certain of our revenues are derived from payments under our
industrialization agreement received in euros while we incur
most of our expenses in U.S. dollars and Australian
dollars. In addition, a portion of our cash and cash equivalents
and investments are held at Australian banking institutions and
are denominated in Australian dollars. We are exposed to foreign
currency exchange rate risks on these amounts. We currently do
not utilize options or forward contracts to mitigate changes in
foreign currency exchange rates. For U.S. reporting
purposes, we translate all assets and liabilities of our
non-U.S. entities
into U.S. dollars using the exchange rate as of the end of
the related period and we translate all revenues and expenses of
our
non-U.S. entities
using the average exchange rate during the applicable period.
44
|
|
Item 8.
|
Financial
Statements and Supplementary Data
|
INDEX TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page
|
|
Audited Consolidated Financial Statements
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
|
|
54
|
|
45
Managements
Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining
adequate internal control over financial reporting, as defined
in
Rules 13a-15(f)
and
15d-15(f)
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Our
internal control over financial reporting was designed to
provide reasonable assurance to management and our Board of
Directors regarding the reliability of financial reporting and
the fair presentation of our consolidated financial statements.
With the participation of our management, including our Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, we conducted an
evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control over
financial reporting based on the framework in Internal
Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of
Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).
Based on our evaluation, our management concluded that our
internal control over financial reporting was effective as of
June 30, 2011 to provide reasonable assurance regarding the
reliability of financial reporting and the fair presentation of
our consolidated financial statements.
KPMG LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm,
audited our internal control over financial reporting as of
June 30, 2011. Their audit report can be found on
page 47.
Alan Shortall
Chief Executive Officer
/s/ R.
Richard Wieland II
R. Richard Wieland II
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Dennis P. Pyers
Vice President, Controller and Chief Accounting Officer
September 13, 2011
46
Report of
Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The Board of Directors and Stockholders
Unilife Corporation:
We have audited Unilife Corporation and subsidiaries (the
Company) internal control over financial reporting as of
June 30, 2011, based on criteria established in Internal
Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of
Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The
Companys management is responsible for maintaining
effective internal control over financial reporting and for its
assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over
financial reporting, included in the accompanying
Managements Report on Internal Control Over Financial
Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the
Companys internal control over financial reporting based
on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control
over financial reporting was maintained in all material
respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of
internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk
that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the
design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on
the assessed risk. Our audit also included performing such other
procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We
believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our
opinion.
A companys internal control over financial reporting is a
process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the
reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of
financial statements for external purposes in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles. A companys
internal control over financial reporting includes those
policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance
of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly
reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the
company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions
are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial
statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company
are being made only in accordance with authorizations of
management and directors of the company; and (3) provide
reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of
unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the
companys assets that could have a material effect on the
financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over
financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements.
Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future
periods are subject to the risk that controls may become
inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree
of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
In our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material
respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as
of June 30, 2011, based on criteria established in
Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the
Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the
consolidated balance sheets of Unilife Corporation as of
June 30, 2011 and 2010, and the related consolidated
statements of operations, stockholders equity and
comprehensive loss, and cash flows for the years then ended, and
our report dated September 13, 2011 expressed an
unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements.
Our report dated September 13, 2011 contains an explanatory
paragraph that states there is substantial doubt about the
Companys ability to continue as a going concern. The
consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments
that might result from the outcome of that uncertainty.
Harrisburg, Pennsylvania
September 13, 2011
47
Report of
Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The Board of Directors and Stockholders
Unilife Corporation:
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of
Unilife Corporation and subsidiaries (the Company) as of
June 30, 2011 and 2010, and the related consolidated
statements of operations, stockholders equity and
comprehensive loss, and cash flows for the years then ended.
These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility
of the Companys management. Our responsibility is to
express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements
based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are
free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a
test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in
the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the
accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial
statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a
reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred
to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial
position of Unilife Corporation and subsidiaries as of
June 30, 2011 and 2010, and the results of their operations
and their cash flows for the years then ended, in conformity
with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been
prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going
concern. As discussed in note 2 to the consolidated
financial statements, the Company has incurred recurring losses
from operations and estimates that its existing cash and cash
equivalents will last only through the third quarter of fiscal
2012, which raises substantial doubt about its ability to
continue as a going concern. Managements plans in regard
to these matters are also described in note 2. The
consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments
that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the
effectiveness of the Companys internal control over
financial reporting as of June 30, 2011, based on criteria
established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework
issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the
Treadway Commission (COSO), and our report dated
September 13, 2011 expressed an unqualified opinion on the
effectiveness of the Companys internal control over
financial reporting.
Harrisburg, Pennsylvania
September 13, 2011
48
Report of
Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Board of Directors and Stockholders
Unilife Corporation
Lewisberry, Pennsylvania
We have audited the accompanying consolidated statements of
operations, stockholders equity and comprehensive loss and
cash flows of Unilife Corporation and subsidiaries for the year
ended June 30, 2009. These financial statements are the
responsibility of the Companys management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial
statements based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are
free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to
have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal
control over financial reporting. Our audit included
consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a
basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the
circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion
on the effectiveness of the Companys internal control over
financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An
audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence
supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial
statements, assessing the accounting principles used and
significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating
the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that
our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred
to above present fairly, in all material respects, the results
of operations and cash flows of Unilife Corporation and
subsidiaries for the year ended June 30, 2009 in conformity
with accounting principles generally accepted in the United
States of America.
/s/ BDO Audit (WA)
Pty Ltd
Perth, Western Australia
September 13, 2011
49
UNILIFE
CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except
|
|
|
|
share data)
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
Current Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
17,910
|
|
|
$
|
20,750
|
|
Restricted cash
|
|
|
2,400
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
1,556
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
626
|
|
|
|
797
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
|
|
|
381
|
|
|
|
637
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
21,330
|
|
|
|
23,740
|
|
Property, plant and equipment, net
|
|
|
54,020
|
|
|
|
29,972
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
13,265
|
|
|
|
10,792
|
|
Intangible assets, net
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
40
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
821
|
|
|
|
273
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
89,478
|
|
|
$
|
64,817
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
|
Current Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
$
|
2,405
|
|
|
$
|
6,044
|
|
Accrued expenses
|
|
|
2,696
|
|
|
|
2,911
|
|
Current portion of long-term debt
|
|
|
2,274
|
|
|
|
1,648
|
|
Deferred revenue
|
|
|
2,706
|
|
|
|
2,188
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
10,081
|
|
|
|
12,791
|
|
Long-term debt, less current portion
|
|
|
20,413
|
|
|
|
1,093
|
|
Deferred revenue
|
|
|
5,412
|
|
|
|
6,563
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
35,906
|
|
|
|
20,447
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and Contingencies (Note 8)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders Equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, $0.01 par value, 50,000,000 shares
authorized as of June 30, 2011; none issued or outstanding
as of June 30, 2011 and 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $0.01 par value, 250,000,000 shares
authorized as of June 30, 2011; 63,924,403 and
54,761,848 shares issued, and 63,905,053 and
54,761,848 shares outstanding as of June 30, 2011 and
2010, respectively
|
|
|
639
|
|
|
|
548
|
|
Additional
paid-in-capital
|
|
|
169,590
|
|
|
|
122,397
|
|
Accumulated deficit
|
|
|
(120,332
|
)
|
|
|
(79,650
|
)
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income
|
|
|
3,775
|
|
|
|
1,075
|
|
Treasury stock, at cost, 19,350 shares as of June 30,
2011
|
|
|
(100
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
|
53,572
|
|
|
|
44,370
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity
|
|
$
|
89,478
|
|
|
$
|
64,817
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.
50
UNILIFE
CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except share data)
|
|
|
Revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Industrialization fees
|
|
$
|
1,350
|
|
|
$
|
6,318
|
|
|
$
|
13,601
|
|
Licensing fees
|
|
|
2,527
|
|
|
|
2,566
|
|
|
|
2,456
|
|
Product sales and other
|
|
|
2,773
|
|
|
|
2,538
|
|
|
|
3,919
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
|
6,650
|
|
|
|
11,422
|
|
|
|
19,976
|
|
Cost of product sales
|
|
|
2,597
|
|
|
|
2,471
|
|
|
|
3,426
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
4,053
|
|
|
|
8,951
|
|
|
|
16,550
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research and development
|
|
|
9,631
|
|
|
|
10,934
|
|
|
|
2,209
|
|
Selling, general and administrative
|
|
|
31,571
|
|
|
|
26,257
|
|
|
|
13,780
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
4,009
|
|
|
|
2,314
|
|
|
|
915
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
45,211
|
|
|
|
39,505
|
|
|
|
16,904
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating loss
|
|
|
(41,158
|
)
|
|
|
(30,554
|
)
|
|
|
(354
|
)
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
511
|
|
|
|
125
|
|
|
|
249
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
(399
|
)
|
|
|
(1,066
|
)
|
|
|
(361
|
)
|
Other (income) expense, net
|
|
|
(588
|
)
|
|
|
135
|
|
|
|
275
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
$
|
(40,682
|
)
|
|
$
|
(29,748
|
)
|
|
$
|
(517
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted loss per share
|
|
$
|
(0.70
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.64
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.02
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.
51
UNILIFE
CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional-
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
|
Paid-In
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
Comprehensive
|
|
|
Treasury
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Capital
|
|
|
Deficit
|
|
|
Income
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except share data)
|
|
|
Balance as of July 1, 2008
|
|
|
34,295,718
|
|
|
$
|
343
|
|
|
$
|
53,835
|
|
|
$
|
(49,385
|
)
|
|
$
|
4,714
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
9,507
|
|
Comprehensive loss:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(517
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(517
|
)
|
Foreign currency translation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,854
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,854
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,371
|
)
|
Issuance of options and warrants to purchase common stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,059
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,059
|
|
Issuance of common stock upon exercise of stock options
|
|
|
97,532
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38
|
|
Issuance of common stock upon conversion of convertible notes
|
|
|
520,000
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
616
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
621
|
|
Issuance of common stock in connection with Employee Share Plan
|
|
|
45,885
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of stock options in connection with the acquisition of
Integrated BioSciences, Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
457
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
457
|
|
Grant of common stock to employee
|
|
|
1,666,667
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
(17
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of June 30, 2009
|
|
|
36,625,802
|
|
|
|
366
|
|
|
|
57,987
|
|
|
|
(49,902
|
)
|
|
|
2,860
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,311
|
|
Comprehensive loss:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(29,748
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(29,748
|
)
|
Foreign currency translation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,785
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,785
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(31,533
|
)
|
Issuance of options and warrants to purchase common stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,463
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,463
|
|
Issuance of restricted stock
|
|
|
1,818,000
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
2,236
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,254
|
|
Issuance of common stock in connection with private placement
and share purchase plan, net of issuance costs
|
|
|
10,544,961
|
|
|
|
106
|
|
|
|
47,011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
47,117
|
|
Issuance of common stock upon exercise of stock options
|
|
|
1,606,419
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
2,332
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,349
|
|
Issuance of common stock to employees
|
|
|
833,333
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
4,331
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,339
|
|
Issuance of common stock to former shareholders of Unitract
Syringe Pty Limited
|
|
|
3,333,333
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
5,037
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,070
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of June 30, 2010
|
|
|
54,761,848
|
|
|
|
548
|
|
|
|
122,397
|
|
|
|
(79,650
|
)
|
|
|
1,075
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
44,370
|
|
Comprehensive loss:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(40,682
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(40,682
|
)
|
Foreign currency translation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,700
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,700
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(37,982
|
)
|
Issuance of options and warrants to purchase common stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,071
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,071
|
|
Issuance of restricted stock, net of forfeitures
|
|
|
420,000
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
6,442
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,446
|
|
Issuance of common stock in connection with private placement
and share purchase plan, net of issuance costs
|
|
|
7,048,373
|
|
|
|
70
|
|
|
|
33,361
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33,431
|
|
Issuance of common stock upon exercise of stock options
|
|
|
1,670,998
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
3,193
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,210
|
|
Issuance of common stock to employees
|
|
|
23,184
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
126
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
126
|
|
Purchase of treasury stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(100
|
)
|
|
|
(100
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of June 30, 2011
|
|
|
63,924,403
|
|
|
$
|
639
|
|
|
$
|
169,590
|
|
|
$
|
(120,332
|
)
|
|
$
|
3,775
|
|
|
$
|
(100
|
)
|
|
$
|
53,572
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.
52
UNILIFE
CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except share data)
|
|
|
Cash flows from operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
$
|
(40,682
|
)
|
|
$
|
(29,748
|
)
|
|
$
|
(517
|
)
|
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash (used in) provided
by operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
3,482
|
|
|
|
2,314
|
|
|
|
915
|
|
Loss on disposal of property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
527
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
Share-based compensation expense
|
|
|
9,022
|
|
|
|
10,056
|
|
|
|
3,059
|
|
Changes in assets and liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
1,739
|
|
|
|
5,852
|
|
|
|
(6,172
|
)
|
Inventories
|
|
|
176
|
|
|
|
302
|
|
|
|
(40
|
)
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
|
|
|
266
|
|
|
|
(385
|
)
|
|
|
(126
|
)
|
Other assets
|
|
|
(552
|
)
|
|
|
270
|
|
|
|
(232
|
)
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
(515
|
)
|
|
|
863
|
|
|
|
586
|
|
Accrued expenses
|
|
|
543
|
|
|
|
656
|
|
|
|
(506
|
)
|
Deferred revenue
|
|
|
(2,527
|
)
|
|
|
(2,570
|
)
|
|
|
9,823
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities
|
|
|
(28,521
|
)
|
|
|
(12,390
|
)
|
|
|
6,795
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
(30,037
|
)
|
|
|
(17,562
|
)
|
|
|
(2,926
|
)
|
Proceeds from the sale of property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
Purchases of certificates of deposit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9,106
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from the redemption of certificates of deposit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,536
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities
|
|
|
(30,037
|
)
|
|
|
(18,132
|
)
|
|
|
(2,912
|
)
|
Cash flows from financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from the issuance of common stock, net of issuance costs
|
|
|
33,431
|
|
|
|
47,117
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from the exercise of options to purchase common stock
|
|
|
3,210
|
|
|
|
2,349
|
|
|
|
38
|
|
Proceeds from the issuance of long-term debt
|
|
|
20,190
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
88
|
|
Principal payments on long-term debt and capital lease agreements
|
|
|
(493
|
)
|
|
|
(411
|
)
|
|
|
(3,391
|
)
|
Proceeds from the issuance of note payable
|
|
|
6,900
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal payments on note payable
|
|
|
(6,900
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase of treasury stock
|
|
|
(100
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Increase) decrease in restricted cash
|
|
|
(2,400
|
)
|
|
|
433
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
|
|
|
53,838
|
|
|
|
49,488
|
|
|
|
(3,265
|
)
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash
|
|
|
1,880
|
|
|
|
(1,843
|
)
|
|
|
122
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
(2,840
|
)
|
|
|
17,123
|
|
|
|
740
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year
|
|
|
20,750
|
|
|
|
3,627
|
|
|
|
2,887
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year
|
|
$
|
17,910
|
|
|
$
|
20,750
|
|
|
$
|
3,627
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid for interest
|
|
$
|
514
|
|
|
$
|
135
|
|
|
$
|
183
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental disclosure of non-cash activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of property, plant and equipment in accounts payable
and accrued expenses
|
|
$
|
1,143
|
|
|
$
|
5,051
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of property, plant and equipment pursuant to capital
lease agreements
|
|
$
|
249
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of common stock to former shareholders of Unitract
Syringe Pty Limited
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
5,070
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of property, plant and equipment through the issuance
of warrants
|
|
$
|
1,621
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.
53
UNILIFE
CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
|
|
1.
|
Description
of Business
|
Unilife Corporation (collectively with its consolidated
subsidiaries, the Company) and subsidiaries is a
U.S. based developer and manufacturer of advanced drug
delivery systems. The primary target customers for the
Companys products include pharmaceutical and biotechnology
companies seeking to optimize drug lifecycles and generate
differentiation for their brand in competitive therapeutic
markets through the use of innovative devices that can improve
patient care, protect healthcare workers and prevent disease.
Customers also include suppliers of medical equipment to
healthcare facilities and distributors to patients who
self-administer prescription medication.
The Company has incurred recurring losses from operations and
anticipates incurring additional losses until such time that it
can generate sufficient sales of its proprietary range of
advanced drug delivery systems. Management estimates that cash
and cash equivalents of $17.9 million as of June 30,
2011 are sufficient to sustain planned operations only through
the third quarter of fiscal 2012.
Therefore, additional funding will be needed in fiscal 2012 by
the Company to support its operations and capital expenditure
requirements. Management has identified several possible funding
strategies which may be available. In addition to sales of its
Unitract and Unifill syringe products to existing partners, the
Company is also in discussions with additional pharmaceutical
companies pertaining to the Unifill syringe and other pipeline
products. Should the Company enter into commercial relationships
relating to the industrialization, commercial supply or
preferred use of a device within a particular therapeutic
market, the Company may pursue additional funding or revenue
streams. The Company may seek to raise additional funds through
the sale of additional equity or debt securities. There can be
no assurance that any such funding will be available when needed
or on acceptable terms. These various factors raise substantial
doubt about the Companys ability to continue as a going
concern.
The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been
prepared on a going concern basis, which contemplates the
realization of assets and satisfaction of liabilities in the
ordinary course of business. The consolidated financial
statements do not include any adjustments relating to the
recoverability and classification of recorded asset amounts or
the amounts and classification of liabilities that might result
from the outcome of this uncertainty.
During August 2011, the Company entered into an equipment lease
which will provide for up to $10.0 million of additional
external financing.
|
|
3.
|
Summary
of Significant Accounting Policies
|
Principles
of Consolidation
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of
Unilife Corporation and its wholly-owned subsidiaries. The
consolidated financial statements have been prepared in
accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States of America (GAAP.) All intercompany
accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
On September 1, 2009, Unilife Medical Solutions Limited, an
Australian Corporation (UMSL), entered into a Merger
Implementation Agreement with Unilife Corporation, a
newly-formed Delaware subsidiary of UMSL, pursuant to which
stockholders and option holders of UMSL would exchange their
existing interests in UMSL for equivalent interests in Unilife
Corporation and Unilife Corporation would become the parent or
ultimate parent of UMSL and its subsidiaries. The
redomiciliation transaction was approved by the Australian
Federal Court and the stockholders and option holders of UMSL
and was completed on January 27, 2010. In the
redomiciliation each holder of UMSL ordinary shares or share
options received one share of common stock or one stock option
of Unilife Corporation for every six UMSL ordinary shares or
share options, respectively, held by such holder, unless a
holder of UMSL ordinary shares elected to receive, in lieu of
common stock, Chess Depository Interests, or CDIs of Unilife
54
UNILIFE
CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
(each representing one-sixth of a share of Unilife common stock)
in which case such holder received one CDI of Unilife for each
ordinary share of UMSL. All share and per share data have been
retroactively restated to reflect the one for six share
recapitalization.
References to the Company include Unilife
Corporation and its consolidated subsidiaries, including UMSL,
unless the context otherwise requires. References to
Unilife are references solely to Unilife Corporation.
References to A$ mean the lawful currency of the Commonwealth of
Australia. References to or euros are to the lawful
currency of the European Union.
Use of
Estimates
The preparation of consolidated financial statements in
conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and
assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the consolidated
financial statements and accompanying notes. The estimates are
principally in the areas of revenue recognition and share-based
compensation expense. Management bases its estimates on
historical experience and various assumptions that are believed
to be reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results could
differ from those estimates.
Cash
and Cash Equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents consist primarily of cash on hand,
deposits at banks and other short-term highly liquid investments
with original maturities of three months or less. Cash
equivalents are stated at cost which approximates fair value.
Accounts
Receivable
Accounts receivable are stated at amounts due from customers,
which also represents the net realizable amount. The Company
evaluates the collectability of its accounts receivable on a
periodic basis and has historically not recorded an allowance
for doubtful accounts. In instances in which management becomes
aware of circumstances that may impair a particular
customers ability to meet its obligation, the related
receivable would be written off. Accounts receivable as of
June 30, 2010 consists principally of amounts due from a
single pharmaceutical company related to the achievement of
certain milestones under the related industrialization agreement
described in Note 13.
Inventories
Inventories consist primarily of plastic syringe components and
include direct materials, direct labor and manufacturing
overhead. Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market,
with cost determined using the first in, first out method. The
Company routinely reviews its inventory for obsolete, slow
moving or otherwise impaired inventory and records estimated
impairments in the periods in which they occur. Inventories
consist of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Raw materials
|
|
$
|
387
|
|
|
$
|
649
|
|
Work in process
|
|
|
210
|
|
|
|
148
|
|
Finished goods
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total inventories
|
|
$
|
626
|
|
|
$
|
797
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
55
UNILIFE
CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
Property,
Plant and Equipment
Property, plant and equipment, including significant
improvements, are recorded at cost, net of accumulated
depreciation and amortization. Repairs and maintenance are
expensed as incurred.
Depreciation and amortization expense is recorded on a
straight-line basis over the estimated useful life of the asset
as listed below:
|
|
|
Asset Category
|
|
Useful Lives
|
|
Building
|
|
40 years
|
Machinery and equipment
|
|
2 to 15 years
|
Computer software
|
|
3 to 7 years
|
Furniture and fixtures
|
|
7 years
|
Leasehold improvements
|
|
Shorter of leasehold improvement life or remaining term of lease
|
Interest expense incurred during the construction of the new
headquarters and manufacturing facility have been capitalized as
one of the elements of cost and are amortized over the useful
life of the building. Interest capitalized during the year ended
June 30, 2011 was $0.3 million with no such
capitalized interest during the years ended June 30, 2010
or 2009.
The Company reviews the carrying value of the long-lived assets
periodically to determine if facts and circumstances exist that
would suggest that assets might be impaired or that the useful
lives should be modified. Among the factors the Company
considers in making the evaluation are changes in market
position and profitability. If facts and circumstances exist
which may indicate impairment, the Company will prepare a
projection of the undiscounted cash flows of the asset group and
determine if the long-lived assets are recoverable based on
these undiscounted cash flows. If impairment is indicated, an
adjustment will be made to reduce the carrying amount of these
assets to their fair value.
Goodwill
and Intangible Assets
Goodwill is the excess of purchase price over the fair value of
net assets acquired in business acquisitions. Goodwill is
subject to, at a minimum, an annual impairment assessment of its
carrying value. Additional impairment assessments would be
performed if events and circumstances warranted such additional
assessments during the year. Goodwill impairment is deemed to
exist if the net book value of the Companys reporting unit
exceeds its estimated fair value. Estimated fair value of the
Companys reporting unit is determined utilizing the value
implied by the Companys year-end quoted stock price. The
Company performs its annual impairment test at the end of its
fiscal year. There were no impairments recorded on goodwill
during the years ended June 30, 2011, 2010 or 2009.
Definite-lived intangible assets include patents which are
amortized on a straight-line basis over their estimated useful
lives of 15 years. The Company reviews intangible assets
for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances
indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be
recoverable. When factors indicate a possible impairment, if the
sum of the estimated undiscounted future cash flows expected to
result from the use and eventual disposition of an asset is less
than the carrying amount of the asset, an impairment may be
recognized. Measurement of an impairment loss is based on the
excess of the carrying value of the asset over its fair value.
There were no impairments recorded on intangible assets during
the years ended June 30, 2011, 2010 or 2009.
Deferred
Financing Costs
Deferred financing costs are included in other assets on the
consolidated balance sheets and consist of costs incurred in
connection with debt financings. These costs are amortized over
the term of the related debt using the effective interest rate
method.
56
UNILIFE
CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
Income
Taxes
Income taxes are accounted for under the asset and liability
method. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for
the future tax consequences attributable to differences between
the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and
liabilities and their respective tax bases and operating loss
and tax credit carryforwards. Deferred tax assets and
liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to
apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary
differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect
on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates
is recognized in income in the period that includes the
enactment date. Deferred tax assets are recorded to the extent
the Company believes they will more likely than not be realized.
In making such determinations, the Company considers all
available positive and negative evidence, including future
reversals of existing temporary differences, projected future
taxable income, tax planning strategies and recent financial
operations. Valuation allowances are established, when
necessary, to reduce deferred tax assets to the amount expected
more likely than not to be realized.
The Company recognizes the effect of income tax positions only
if those positions are more likely than not of being sustained.
Recognized income tax positions are measured at the largest
amount that is greater than 50% likely of being realized.
Changes in recognition or measurement are reflected in the
period in which the change in judgment occurs. The
Companys policy is to include interest and penalties
related to uncertain tax positions within the provision
(benefit) for income taxes within the Companys
consolidated statements of operations.
Fair
Value of Financial Instruments
The carrying value of financial instruments such as accounts
receivable, accounts payable and accrued expenses are reasonable
estimates of their fair value because of the short maturity of
these items. The Company believes that the current carrying
amount of its long-term debt approximates fair value because the
interest rates on these instruments are similar to those rates
that the Company would currently be able to receive for similar
instruments of comparable maturity.
Share-Based
Compensation
The Company grants stock options, restricted stock and common
stock as compensation to its employees, directors and
consultants. Certain employee and director awards vest over
stated vesting periods and others also require achievement of
specific performance or market conditions. The Company expenses
the grant-date fair value of awards to employees and directors
over their respective vesting periods. To the extent that
employee and director awards vest only upon the achievement of a
specific performance condition, expense is recognized over the
period from the date management determines that the performance
condition is probable of achievement through the date they are
expected to be met. Awards granted to consultants are sometimes
granted for past services, in which case their fair value is
expensed on their grant date, while other awards require future
service, or the achievement of performance or market conditions.
Timing of expense recognition for consultant awards is similar
to that of employee and director awards; however, aggregate
expense is re-measured each quarter-end based on the then fair
value of the award through the vesting date of the award. The
Company estimates the fair value of stock options using the
Black-Scholes option-pricing model, with the exception of
market-based grants, which are valued based on Barrier and Monte
Carlo option pricing models. Option pricing methods require the
input of highly subjective assumptions, including the expected
stock price volatility. See Note 4 for additional
information regarding share-based compensation.
Foreign
Currency Translation
The Australian dollar (A$) is the functional
currency for the Companys Australian operations. Assets
and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies are translated
into U.S. dollars at the rate of exchange existing at the
end of the period. Revenues and expenses are translated at the
average exchange rates during the applicable period. Adjustments
resulting from these translations are recorded in accumulated
other comprehensive income within the
57
UNILIFE
CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
Companys consolidated balance sheets and will be included
in income upon sale or liquidation of the foreign investment.
Gains and losses from foreign currency transactions, denominated
in a currency other than the functional currency, are recorded
in other expense (income) within the Companys consolidated
statements of operations and aggregated $0.1 million,
$0.1 million and $0.3 million during the years ended
June 30, 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively.
Comprehensive
Income (Loss)
Comprehensive income (loss) includes net income (loss) and other
comprehensive income (loss). The Companys other
comprehensive income (loss) consists only of foreign currency
translation adjustments.
Revenue
Recognition
The Company recognizes revenue from licensing fees,
industrialization efforts and product sales.
In June 2008, the Company entered into an exclusive licensing
arrangement to allow its pharmaceutical partner to use certain
of the Companys intellectual property in order and solely
to develop in collaboration with the Company, the Companys
Unifill syringe for use in and sale to the pre-filled syringe
market. The 10.0 million euro up-front, non-refundable fee
paid for this license is being amortized over the 5 year
expected life of the related agreement. In late fiscal 2009, the
Company entered into an industrialization agreement with its
pharmaceutical partner, under which specific payment amounts and
completion dates were established for achievement of certain
pre-defined milestones in its development of the Unifill
syringe. Revenue is recognized upon achievement of the at
risk milestone events, which represents the culmination of
the earnings process related to such events. Milestones include
specific phases of the project such as product design, prototype
availability, user tests, manufacturing proof of principle and
the various steps to complete the industrialization of the
product. Revenue recognized is commensurate with the milestones
achieved and the Company has no future performance obligations
related to previous milestone payments as each milestone payment
is non-refundable when received.
The Company recognizes revenue from sales of products at the
time of shipment and when title passes to the customer. Product
sales from B. Braun, a customer who accounted for 10% or more of
the Companys revenue, were $2.5 million,
$2.5 million and $2.6 million during the years ended
June 30, 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively.
Advertising
Costs
Advertising costs are expensed in the period incurred. The
Company incurred total advertising costs of $0.6 million,
$0.5 million and $0.1 million during the years ended
June 30, 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively.
Research
and Development Costs
Research and development costs, which primarily consist of
salaries, benefits and contracted services are expensed as
incurred.
Earnings
(Loss) Per Share
Basic earnings (loss) per share is computed as net income (loss)
divided by the weighted average number of shares outstanding
during the period. Diluted earnings per share reflect the
potential dilution that could occur from common shares issued
through common stock equivalents. The dilutive effect of
potential common shares, consisting of non-participating
restricted stock and outstanding options to purchase common
stock, is calculated using the treasury stock method.
Unvested share-based payment awards that contain nonforfeitable
rights to dividends or dividend equivalents, whether paid or
unpaid, are considered participating securities and are included
in the computation of earnings (loss) per share according to the
two class method if the impact is dilutive. Shares of the
Companys unvested
58
UNILIFE
CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
restricted stock are considered participating securities.
However, in the event of a net loss, participating securities
are excluded from the calculation of both basic and diluted
earnings (loss) per share.
Government
Grants
Government grants are recognized when there is reasonable
assurance that the grant will be received and all attached
conditions will be complied with.
Business
Segments
The Company operates in one reportable segment, which includes
the design, development and manufacture of advanced drug
delivery systems. Sales by geographic location are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Domestic
|
|
$
|
2,773
|
|
|
$
|
2,538
|
|
|
$
|
3,919
|
|
International
|
|
|
3,877
|
|
|
|
8,884
|
|
|
|
16,057
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
6,650
|
|
|
$
|
11,422
|
|
|
$
|
19,976
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reclassifications
Certain amounts in the consolidated statements of operations
were reclassified from selling, general and administrative
expenses to research and development expenses during the years
ended June 30, 2010 and 2009. Management has determined
that activities performed by certain employees were more closely
associated with research and development activities and has
reclassified those items on the accompanying consolidated
statements of operations.
This reclassification did not affect the consolidated balance
sheets or consolidated statements of cash flows. Additionally,
the reclassification did not affect operating loss or net loss
on the consolidated statements of operations. The following
table summarizes the as reported and as adjusted amounts related
to the reclassification discussed above:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended June 30,
|
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Research and development as reported
|
|
$
|
8,495
|
|
|
$
|
1,048
|
|
Research and development as adjusted
|
|
$
|
10,934
|
|
|
$
|
2,209
|
|
Selling, general and administrative as reported
|
|
$
|
28,696
|
|
|
$
|
14,941
|
|
Selling, general and administrative as adjusted
|
|
$
|
26,257
|
|
|
$
|
13,780
|
|
Recently
Issued Accounting Pronouncements
In March 2010, the Financial Accounting Standards Board
(FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update
(ASU)
2010-17,
Milestone Method of Revenue Recognition, a consensus of
the FASB Emerging Issues Task Force (Issue
No. 08-9)
(ASU
2010-17).
ASU 2010-17
provides guidance about the criteria that must be met to use the
milestone method of revenue recognition. This ASU is effective
for milestones achieved in fiscal years and interim periods
within those years, beginning after June 15, 2010. The
Company adopted ASU
2010-17 on
July 1, 2010 and its adoption did not have a material
impact on its consolidated financial statements.
In June 2011, the FASB issued ASU
2011-05,
Comprehensive Income (ASU
2011-05).
ASU 2011-05
removes certain presentation options and requires entities to
report components of net income and comprehensive income in
either one continuous statement of comprehensive income or two
separate but consecutive statements.
59
UNILIFE
CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
There is no change to the items that are reported in other
comprehensive income. ASU
2011-05 is
effective for annual and interim periods beginning after
December 15, 2011. Other than additional presentation of
other comprehensive loss outside of the statements of
stockholders equity and comprehensive loss, the adoption
of ASU
2011-05 will
not have an impact on the Companys consolidated financial
statements.
|
|
4.
|
Equity
Transactions and Share-Based Compensation
|
In October and November 2009, the Company issued
10,544,961 shares of common stock and 3,145,767 options to
purchase common stock for aggregate proceeds of
A$50.9 million ($47.1 million), net of issuance costs,
through a combination of a U.S. and Australian private
placement and a share purchase plan for the Companys
Australian and New Zealand stockholders. Of these options, 50%
are exercisable at A$7.50 per share, and 50% are exercisable at
A$12.00 per share. The Company also issued 497,662 options to
purchase common stock to certain brokers as consideration for
their services in connection with the private placement, which
are exercisable at A$5.10 per share. All of the options
described above are immediately exercisable and will expire in
November 2012.
In November 2009, the Company issued 3,333,333 shares of
common stock to the former stockholders of Unitract Syringe Pty
Limited. These shares were issued in full satisfaction of the
Companys obligation for the purchase of that business
which had been accrued for on the date of purchase.
In January 2010, the Company issued 833,333 fully vested shares
of common stock to certain employees in consideration of their
transfer to the Company of certain intellectual property rights
and recognized $4.3 million of share-based compensation
expense classified in research and development expense.
In December 2010, the Company issued 7,048,373 shares of
common stock and 2,268,934 options to purchase common stock for
aggregate proceeds of A$34.1 million ($33.4 million),
net of issuance costs, through an Australian private placement
and a share purchase plan for the Companys Australian and
New Zealand stockholders. Of these options, 50% are exercisable
at A$7.50 per share, and 50% are exercisable at A$12.00 per
share. The options became exercisable in June 2011 and will
expire in December 2013.
The Company recognized share-based compensation expense related
to stock options, grants of restricted stock and common stock to
employees, directors and consultants of $9.0 million,
$10.1 million and $3.1 million during the years ended
June 30, 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively.
As of June 30, 2011, the total compensation cost related to
all non-vested awards not yet recognized is $10.3 million.
This amount is expected to be recognized over a remaining
weighted average period of 1.62 years.
Stock
Options and Warrants
The Company has granted stock options to certain employees and
directors under the Employee Share Option Plan (the
Plan). The Plan is designed to assist in the
motivation and retention of employees and to recognize the
importance of employees to the long-term performance and success
of the Company. The Company has also granted stock options to
certain consultants outside of the Plan. The majority of the
options to purchase common stock vest on the anniversary of the
date of grant, which ranges from one to three years.
Additionally, certain stock options vest upon the closing price
of the Companys common stock reaching certain minimum
levels, as defined in the agreements. Share-based compensation
expense related to options granted to employees is recognized on
a straight-line basis over the related vesting term. Share-based
compensation expense related to options granted to consultants
is recognized ratably over each vesting tranche of the options.
During the year ended June 30, 2010, the Company granted
383,333 options to purchase common stock to certain employees
and directors under the Plan. The options are exercisable at
prices ranging from A$2.10 to A$7.20 per share and vest over a
period of three years. The weighted average grant date fair
value of the options is $2.08 per share.
60
UNILIFE
CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
During the year ended June 30, 2010, the Company granted
3,643,429 options to purchase common stock outside of both the
Plan and the Stock Incentive Plan in connection with the
Companys November 2009 private placement as discussed
above.
In November 2009, the Company adopted the 2009 Stock Incentive
Plan (the Stock Incentive Plan). The Stock Incentive
Plan provides for a maximum of 6,000,000 shares of common
stock to be reserved for the issuance of stock options and other
stock-based awards. Commencing on January 1, 2011, and on
each January 1st thereafter, through January 1,
2019, the share reserve will automatically adjust so that it
will equal 12.5% of the weighted average number of shares of
common stock outstanding reduced by the sum of any shares of
common stock issued under the Stock Incentive Plan and any
shares of common stock subject to outstanding awards under the
Stock Incentive Plan.
In November 2009, the Companys compensation committee
approved a new incentive package for its Chief Executive
Officer, which included the issuance of 834,000 options to
purchase common stock under the Stock Incentive Plan. The
options were issued on February 3, 2010 following
stockholder approval of the incentive package. The options are
exercisable at $6.64 per share and vest upon the trading price
of the Companys common stock reaching certain minimum
levels on Nasdaq, which range from $9.45 to $17.82 per share.
The grant date fair value of the options was $3.18 per share and
the fair value of the options is being expensed on a
straight-line basis over a derived service period of
1.92 years.
In January 2010, the Company issued 1,000,000 options to
purchase common stock to a consultant under the Stock Incentive
Plan in consideration for various services to be performed for
the Company. The options to purchase common stock are
exercisable at A$6.33 per share and vest upon the trading price
of the Companys CDIs reaching certain minimum levels on
the Australian Securities Exchange, which range from A$1.75 to
A$3.22 per share. The options are re-measured each reporting
date and as of June 30, 2011 were valued at $2.29 per
option, which is being expensed ratably over the vesting period
of each tranche, which ranges from 1.30 years to
2.0 years. The options will be re-valued on a quarterly
basis and marked to market until exercised.
In June 2010, the Company issued 240,000 options to purchase
common stock to its Chief Financial Officer under the Stock
Incentive Plan. The options are exercisable at $5.28 per share
and vest upon the market capitalization of the Company reaching
certain minimum levels, ranging from $500.0 million to
$1,500.0 million. The grant date fair value of the options
was $2.38 per share and the fair value of the options is being
expensed on a straight-line basis over a derived service period
of 2.70 years.
During the year ended June 30, 2010, the Company granted
70,000 additional options to purchase common stock to certain
employees under the Stock Incentive Plan. The options are
exercisable at $5.80 per share and vest over a period of three
years. The weighted average grant date fair value of the options
was $2.71 per share.
In December 2010, the Company issued 375,000 warrants to
Keystone Redevelopment Group, LLC (Keystone) and
225,000 warrants to L2 Architecture (L2) outside of
both the Plan and the Stock Incentive Plan. The warrants issued
to Keystone were in partial consideration for managing the
development of the Companys new headquarters and
manufacturing facility and the warrants issued to L2 were in
partial consideration for the custom design of the facility. The
warrants issued to both Keystone and L2 are exercisable at $5.30
per warrant vested immediately upon issuance and were valued at
$2.70 per warrant. The aggregate fair value of the warrants of
$1.6 million has been capitalized and included as a
component of the cost of the building.
In December 2010, the Company issued 2,268,934 options to
purchase common stock outside of both the Plan and the Stock
Incentive Plan in connection with the Companys December
2010 private placement as discussed above.
In February 2011, the Company issued 300,000 options to purchase
common stock to its Chief Operating Officer under the Stock
Incentive Plan. The options are exercisable at $4.85 per share
and vest in eight equal installments based upon the achievement
of operational and product milestones as determined by the
compensation
61
UNILIFE
CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
committee of the board of directors. The weighted average grant
date fair value of the options was $2.73 per share and the fair
value of the options is being expensed on a straight-line basis
over a weighted average estimated service period of
1.31 years.
During year ended June 30, 2011, the Company granted
1,193,517 additional options to purchase common stock to certain
employees and directors under the Stock Incentive Plan. The
weighted average exercise price of the options was $5.75 per
share. The majority of the options vest over a period of three
years, with the exception of 360,000 options, which vest upon
meeting certain performance targets, as defined in the
agreements. The weighted average grant date fair value of the
options was $2.80 per share.
In April and May 2011, the Company granted 300,000 options to
purchase common stock to certain employees under the Stock
Incentive Plan, with a weighted average exercise price of $5.02
per share for which the performance-based vesting terms have not
been mutually agreed upon between the parties. Due to the fact
that material terms have not been mutually agreed upon between
the grantees and the Company, the criteria for establishing a
grant under Accounting Standards Codification (ASC)
Topic 718, Compensation Stock
Compensation has not been met. As a result, share-based
compensation expense recorded during the year ended
June 30, 2011 does not include any amounts related to these
awards.
The following is a summary of activity related to stock options
held by employees and board members during the year ended
June 30, 2011:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Remaining
|
|
|
Aggregate
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Exercise
|
|
|
Contractual Life
|
|
|
Intrinsic
|
|
|
|
Options
|
|
|
Price
|
|
|
(In Years)
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Outstanding as of July 1, 2010
|
|
|
4,058,701
|
|
|
$
|
3.70
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
1,493,517
|
|
|
|
5.57
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(573,031
|
)
|
|
|
2.14
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cancelled
|
|
|
(279,976
|
)
|
|
|
3.86
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding as of June 30, 2011
|
|
|
4,699,211
|
|
|
$
|
4.48
|
|
|
|
4.1
|
|
|
$
|
5,455
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable as of June 30, 2011
|
|
|
2,044,169
|
|
|
$
|
2.64
|
|
|
|
2.2
|
|
|
$
|
5,072
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following is a summary of activity related to stock options
and warrants held by non-employees during the year ended
June 30, 2011:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Remaining
|
|
|
Aggregate
|
|
|
|
Options and
|
|
|
Exercise
|
|
|
Contractual Life
|
|
|
Intrinsic
|
|
|
|
Warrants
|
|
|
Price
|
|
|
(In Years)
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Outstanding as of July 1, 2010
|
|
|
6,355,642
|
|
|
$
|
7.15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
2,868,934
|
|
|
|
9.28
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(1,097,967
|
)
|
|
|
2.07
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding as of June 30, 2011
|
|
|
8,126,609
|
|
|
$
|
8.59
|
|
|
|
2.2
|
|
|
$
|
1,759
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable as of June 30, 2011
|
|
|
7,126,609
|
|
|
$
|
8.85
|
|
|
|
2.0
|
|
|
$
|
1,759
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The aggregate intrinsic value is defined as the difference
between the market value of the Companys common stock as
of the end of the period and the exercise price of the
in-the-money
stock options. The total intrinsic value of
62
UNILIFE
CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
stock options exercised during the years ended June 30,
2011, 2010 and 2009 was $6.0 million, $5.8 million and
$93,000, respectively. Of the 3,655,042 non vested options,
1,000,000 are held by a consultant.
The Company currently uses authorized and unissued shares to
satisfy stock option exercises.
The weighted average fair value of stock options granted during
the years ended June 30, 2011, 2010 and 2009 was $2.65,
$3.13 and $0.62 per share, respectively. The weighted average
fair value of $2.65 per share during the year ended
June 30, 2011 does not include the weighted average fair
value of the stock options granted in connection with the
Companys 2010 private placement of $1.26 per share. The
weighted average fair value of $3.13 per share during the year
ended June 30, 2010 does not include the weighted average
fair value of the stock options granted in connection with the
Companys 2009 private placement of $2.49 per share.
The following is a summary of outstanding and exercisable stock
options held by employees and board members as of June 30,
2011:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding Options
|
|
|
Exercisable Options
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
Outstanding
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Exercisable
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
as of
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Remaining
|
|
|
as of
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Remaining
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
Exercise
|
|
|
Contractual
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
Exercise
|
|
|
Contractual
|
|
Range of Exercise Prices
|
|
2011
|
|
|
Price
|
|
|
Life (In Years)
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
Price
|
|
|
Life (In Years)
|
|
|
$0.00 $2.10
|
|
|
1,733,337
|
|
|
$
|
2.08
|
|
|
|
2.0
|
|
|
|
1,666,667
|
|
|
$
|
2.09
|
|
|
|
1.9
|
|
$2.11 $4.85
|
|
|
475,000
|
|
|
|
3.88
|
|
|
|
6.4
|
|
|
|
179,167
|
|
|
|
2.76
|
|
|
|
3.1
|
|
$4.86 $7.63
|
|
|
2,490,874
|
|
|
|
6.26
|
|
|
|
5.2
|
|
|
|
198,335
|
|
|
|
7.20
|
|
|
|
3.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,699,211
|
|
|
$
|
4.48
|
|
|
|
4.1
|
|
|
|
2,044,169
|
|
|
$
|
2.64
|
|
|
|
2.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following is a summary of outstanding and exercisable stock
options held by non-employees as of June 30, 2011:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding Options
|
|
|
Exercisable Options
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
Outstanding
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Exercisable
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
as of
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Remaining
|
|
|
as of
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Remaining
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
Exercise
|
|
|
Contractual
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
Exercise
|
|
|
Contractual
|
|
Range of Exercise Prices
|
|
2011
|
|
|
Price
|
|
|
Life (In Years)
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
Price
|
|
|
Life (In Years)
|
|
|
$0.00 $2.10
|
|
|
535,245
|
|
|
$
|
1.88
|
|
|
|
1.2
|
|
|
|
535,245
|
|
|
$
|
1.88
|
|
|
|
1.2
|
|
$2.11 $6.71
|
|
|
2,176,662
|
|
|
|
5.90
|
|
|
|
3.3
|
|
|
|
1,176,662
|
|
|
|
5.19
|
|
|
|
3.0
|
|
$6.72 $12.72
|
|
|
5,414,702
|
|
|
|
10.33
|
|
|
|
1.8
|
|
|
|
5,414,702
|
|
|
|
10.33
|
|
|
|
1.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,126,609
|
|
|
$
|
8.59
|
|
|
|
2.2
|
|
|
|
7,126,609
|
|
|
$
|
8.85
|
|
|
|
2.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company used the following weighted average assumptions in
calculating the fair value of options and warrants granted
during the year ended June 30, 2011, the period from
January 27, 2010 to June 30, 2010 (the period
63
UNILIFE
CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
subsequent to the Companys redomiciliation), the period
from July 1, 2009 to January 26, 2010 (the period
prior to the Companys redomiciliation) and the year ended
June 30, 2009 (prior to the Companys redomiciliation):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period From
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period From
|
|
July 1,
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
January 27, 2010 to
|
|
2009 to
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
June 30,
|
|
January 26,
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
2011
|
|
2010
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
Number of stock options granted
|
|
|
2,093,517
|
|
|
|
1,144,000
|
|
|
|
1,383,333
|
|
|
|
3,850,000
|
|
Expected dividend yield
|
|
|
0
|
%
|
|
|
0
|
%
|
|
|
0
|
%
|
|
|
0
|
%
|
Risk-free interest rate
|
|
|
1.96
|
%
|
|
|
2.35
|
%
|
|
|
4.10
|
%
|
|
|
4.76
|
%
|
Expected volatility
|
|
|
59
|
%
|
|
|
60
|
%
|
|
|
79
|
%
|
|
|
80
|
%
|
Expected life (in years)
|
|
|
5.15
|
|
|
|
3.99
|
|
|
|
4.23
|
|
|
|
4.4
|
|
The assumptions noted above for the year ended June 30,
2011 do not include amounts related to the 2,268,934 options
issued in the Companys December 2010 private placement as
discussed above. The assumptions noted above for the period from
July 1, 2009 to January 26, 2010 do not include
amounts related to the 3,643,429 options issued in the
Companys October 2009 private placement, as discussed
above.
Subsequent to the Companys redomiciliation, the fair value
of each stock option was estimated at the grant date using the
Black-Scholes option pricing model, with the exception of grants
subject to market conditions, which were valued using a Monte
Carlo option pricing model. The Company has not historically
paid dividends to its stockholders and, as a result, assumed a
dividend yield of 0%. The risk free interest rate is based upon
the rates of U.S. Treasury bonds with a term equal to the
expected term of the option. Due to the Companys limited
Nasdaq trading history, the expected volatility used to value
options granted after January 27, 2010 is based upon a
blended rate of the historical share price of the Companys
stock on the Australian Securities Exchange and the volatility
of peer companies traded on U.S. exchanges operating in the
same industry as the Company. The expected term of the options
to purchase common stock issued to employees and directors is
based upon the simplified method, which is the mid-point between
the vesting date of the option and its contractual term unless a
reasonable alternate term is estimated by management. The
expected term of the options to purchase common stock issued to
consultants is based on the contractual term of the awards.
Prior to the Companys redomiciliation, the fair value of
each stock option was estimated at the grant date using the
Black-Scholes option pricing model, with the exception of grants
subject to market conditions which were valued based on a
Barrier option pricing model. The Company has not historically
paid dividends to its stockholders and, as a result, assumed a
dividend yield of 0%. The risk free interest rate is based upon
the rates of Australian bonds with a term equal to the expected
term of the option. The expected volatility is based upon the
historical share price of the Companys common stock on the
Australian Securities Exchange. The expected term of the stock
options to purchase common stock is based upon the outstanding
contractual term of the stock option on the date of grant.
Restricted
Stock
The Company has granted shares of restricted stock to certain
employees and consultants under the Stock Incentive Plan. During
the period prior to vesting, the holder of the non-vested
restricted stock will have the right to vote and the right to
receive all dividends and other distributions declared. All
non-vested shares of restricted stock are reflected as
outstanding; however, they have been excluded from the
calculation of basic earnings per share.
For employees, the fair value of restricted stock is measured on
the date of grant using the closing price of the Companys
common stock on that date. Share-based compensation expense for
restricted stock issued to employees is recognized on a
straight-line basis over the requisite service period, which is
generally the longest vesting period. For restricted stock
granted to consultants, the fair value of the awards will be
re-valued on a quarterly basis and
64
UNILIFE
CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
marked to market until vested. Share-based compensation expense
for restricted stock issued to consultants is recognized ratably
over each vesting tranche.
In November 2009, the Companys compensation committee
approved the issuance of 1,166,000 shares of restricted
stock to the Companys Chief Executive Officer under the
Stock Incentive Plan. The shares were issued in February 2010
following stockholder approval. The shares of restricted stock
vest upon the satisfaction of certain performance targets, as
defined in the agreement. The grant date fair value of the
restricted shares was $6.64 per share.
In June 2010, the Company issued 80,000 shares of
restricted stock to the Companys Chief Financial Officer
under the Stock Incentive Plan. The shares of restricted stock
vest on certain anniversaries from the date of grant, ranging
from one to three years. The grant date fair value of the
restricted shares was $5.28 per share.
In March 2010, the Company issued 572,000 shares of
restricted stock to certain employees and a consultant. The
majority of the shares of restricted stock vest on certain
anniversaries from the date of grant, ranging from one to three
years. The remaining shares vest upon the satisfaction of
certain performance targets, as defined in the agreements. The
weighted average grant date fair value of the restricted shares
was $6.07 per share.
In February 2011, the Company issued 120,000 shares of
restricted stock to its Chief Operating Officer under the Stock
Incentive Plan. A total of 80,000 shares of the restricted
stock vest on certain anniversaries from the date of grant,
ranging from one to three years and a total of
40,000 shares of restricted stock vest upon the achievement
of certain performance conditions, as defined in the agreement.
The grant date fair value of the restricted shares was $4.85 per
share.
The following is a summary of activity related to restricted
stock awards during the year ended June 30, 2011.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Weighted Average
|
|
|
|
Restricted Stock
|
|
|
Grant Date Fair
|
|
|
|
Awards
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Unvested as of July 1, 2010
|
|
|
1,818,000
|
|
|
$
|
6.40
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
470,000
|
|
|
|
5.24
|
|
Vested
|
|
|
(281,000
|
)
|
|
|
6.07
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
(50,000
|
)
|
|
|
5.46
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unvested as of June 30 2011
|
|
|
1,957,000
|
|
|
$
|
6.19
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grants
of Common Stock to Employees
During the year ended June 30, 2009 the Company granted
45,885 shares of common stock to certain employees. The
Company recorded a charge to operations of $44,000 related to
the issuance of these awards.
During the year ended June 30, 2009, the Company granted
1,666,667 shares of common stock to its Chief Executive
Officer. The shares are subject to certain transfer restrictions
in which 833,333 cannot be sold until the first anniversary of
the date of grant and 833,334 cannot be sold until the second
anniversary of the date of grant. During the year ended
June 30, 2009, the Company recorded a charge to operations
of $1.5 million related to the issuance of these awards.
During the year ended June 30, 2011, the Company granted
23,184 shares of common stock to certain employees. The
Company recorded a charge to operations of $0.1 million
related to the issuance of these awards.
65
UNILIFE
CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
|
|
5.
|
Property,
Plant and Equipment and
Construction-in-Progress
|
Property, plant and equipment consist of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Building
|
|
$
|
31,866
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Machinery and equipment
|
|
|
16,130
|
|
|
|
10,848
|
|
Computer software
|
|
|
2,457
|
|
|
|
528
|
|
Furniture and fixtures
|
|
|
323
|
|
|
|
737
|
|
Construction in progress
|
|
|
5,734
|
|
|
|
18,560
|
|
Land
|
|
|
2,036
|
|
|
|
2,036
|
|
Leasehold improvements
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,026
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
58,546
|
|
|
|
33,735
|
|
Less: accumulated depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
(4,526
|
)
|
|
|
(3,763
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment, net
|
|
$
|
54,020
|
|
|
$
|
29,972
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Construction in progress as of June 30, 2011 consisted
primarily of amounts incurred in connection with machinery and
equipment. Construction in progress as of June 30, 2010
consisted primarily of amounts incurred in connection with the
construction of the Companys new manufacturing facility
and machinery and equipment.
|
|
6.
|
Goodwill
and Intangible Assets
|
The changes in the carrying amount of goodwill during the years
ended June 30, 2010 and 2011 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Balance as of July 1, 2009
|
|
$
|
10,235
|
|
Foreign currency translation
|
|
|
557
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of June 30, 2010
|
|
|
10,792
|
|
Foreign currency translation
|
|
|
2,473
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of June 30, 2011
|
|
$
|
13,265
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intangible assets consist of patents acquired in a business
acquisition of $0.1 million. Related accumulated
amortization as of June 30, 2011 and 2010 was $63,000 and
$40,000 respectively, and future amortization expense is
scheduled to be $7,000 annually.
Accrued expenses consist of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Accrued payroll and other employee related expenses
|
|
$
|
1,737
|
|
|
$
|
1,405
|
|
Accrued machinery and equipment costs
|
|
|
231
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued construction costs related to the new manufacturing
facility
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,003
|
|
Accrued other
|
|
|
728
|
|
|
|
503
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total accrued expenses
|
|
$
|
2,696
|
|
|
$
|
2,911
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
66
UNILIFE
CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
|
|
8.
|
Commitments
and Contingencies
|
The Company leases certain facilities, office equipment and
automobiles under non-cancellable operating leases. The future
minimum lease payments related to the Companys
non-cancellable operating lease commitments as of June 30,
2011 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
For the Year Ending June 30,
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
2012
|
|
$
|
60
|
|
2013
|
|
|
33
|
|
2014
|
|
|
14
|
|
2015
|
|
|
3
|
|
2016
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
112
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rental expenses under operating leases during the years ended
June 30, 2011, 2010 and 2009 was $0.7 million,
$0.6 million and $0.7 million, respectively.
From time to time, the Company is involved in various legal
proceedings, claims, suits and complaints arising out of the
normal course of business. Based on the facts currently
available to the Company, management believes that these claims,
suits and complaints are adequately provided for, covered by
insurance, without merit or not probable that an unfavorable
outcome will result.
Long-term debt consists of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Mortgage loans
|
|
$
|
17,940
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Bank term loans
|
|
|
2,095
|
|
|
|
2,393
|
|
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania financing authority loan
|
|
|
2,227
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania assisted machinery loans
|
|
|
237
|
|
|
|
332
|
|
Other
|
|
|
188
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,687
|
|
|
|
2,741
|
|
Less: current portion of long-term debt
|
|
|
2,274
|
|
|
|
1,648
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total long-term debt
|
|
$
|
20,413
|
|
|
$
|
1,093
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage
Loans
In October 2010, the Company entered into a loan agreement with
Metro Bank (Metro), pursuant to which Metro agreed
to provide the Company with two notes in the amounts of
$14.25 million and $3.75 million. The proceeds
received have been used to finance the purchase of the land and
construction of the Companys new corporate headquarters
and manufacturing facility in York, Pennsylvania, including the
repayment of a $6.9 million bridge construction loan with
Univest.
The $14.25 million term note matures 20 years from
completion of construction of the Companys new corporate
headquarters and manufacturing facility and the
$3.75 million term note matures on October 20, 2020.
During construction, the Company paid only interest on both term
notes at the Prime Rate plus 1.50% per annum,
67
UNILIFE
CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
with a floor of 4.50% per annum. For a period of five years
subsequent to construction, the Company will pay principal and
interest on both term notes, with interest at a fixed rate based
on the 5 year Treasury-bill plus 300 basis points per
annum, with a floor of 6.0% per annum. Commencing five years
subsequent to construction through the maturity dates for each
term note, the Company will pay principal and interest on both
term notes, with interest at a rate to be negotiated by the
parties, or if no rate is negotiated, based upon the Prime Rate
plus 1.0% per annum, with a floor not to exceed 250 basis
points over the Prime Rate. The Company will also pay one final
payment of principal and interest upon the maturity of each term
note.
The loan agreement contains certain customary covenants,
including the maintenance of a Debt Service Reserve Account in
the amount of $2.4 million, classified as restricted cash
on the consolidated balance sheet, which will remain in place
until the Company and Metro agree on the financial covenants.
The Company was in compliance with its debt covenants as of
June 30, 2011. However, the Company is not certain that it
will be able to maintain the Debt Service Reserve Account
balance for a period of 12 months from June 30, 2011. The
Company may prepay the loan, but will incur a prepayment penalty
of 2.0% during the first three years. The U.S. Department
of Agriculture has guaranteed $10.0 million of the loan.
As of June 30, 2011, $14.19 million was outstanding
under the $14.25 million note and the full amount was
outstanding under the $3.75 million note.
Bank
Term Loans
Bank term loans consist of two term loans payable. The loans
bear interest at a rate of prime (3.25% as of June 30,
2011) plus 1.50%. (4.75% as of June 30, 2011) per
annum and mature on dates ranging from December 2020 through
August 2021. The borrowings under the bank term loans are
collateralized by the Companys accounts receivable,
inventories and certain machinery and equipment. In February
2011, the bank term loan agreements were amended so that the
covenants are consistent with those under the Companys
mortgage loans as discussed above, thus removing the covenants
that were in violation as of June 30, 2010. Due to the
previous violation of the bank term loan covenants as of
June 30, 2010 and the uncertainty of being able to maintain
the Debt Service Reserve Account balance for a period of
12 months from June 30, 2011, the $1.2 million
long-term portion outstanding as of June 30, 2011 under
these bank term loans is classified in the current portion of
long-term debt.
Commonwealth
of Pennsylvania Financing Authority Loan
In October 2009, the Company accepted a $5.45 million offer
of assistance from the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania which
included up to $2.25 million in financing for land and the
construction of its new manufacturing facility. In December
2010, Unilife Cross Farm LLC, a subsidiary of the Company
(Cross Farm), received the $2.25 million loan
which bears interest at a rate of 5.0% per annum, matures in
January 2021 and is secured by a third mortgage on its new
facility. In connection with the loan agreement, Cross Farm
entered into an intercreditor agreement by which the
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania agreed that it would not exercise
its rights in the event of a default by Cross Farm without the
consent of Metro, who holds the first and second mortgages on
its new facility.
Commonwealth
of Pennsylvania Assisted Machinery Loans
The Company has qualified for two Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
assisted loans for the purchase of specific machinery and
equipment. These loans bear interest at rates ranging from 2.75%
to 3.25% per annum and mature on dates ranging from July 2011
through July 2013. The borrowings under these loans are
collateralized by the related equipment.
68
UNILIFE
CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
As of June 30, 2011, aggregate maturities of long-term
obligations are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
For the Year Ending June 30,
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
2012
|
|
$
|
1,121
|
|
2013
|
|
|
1,147
|
|
2014
|
|
|
1,154
|
|
2015
|
|
|
1,114
|
|
2016
|
|
|
1,152
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
16,999
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
22,687
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Companys net loss per share is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except share and per share data)
|
|
|
Numerator
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
$
|
(40,682
|
)
|
|
$
|
(29,748
|
)
|
|
$
|
(517
|
)
|
Denominator
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of shares used to compute basic loss per
share
|
|
|
57,891,024
|
|
|
|
46,837,066
|
|
|
|
34,426,353
|
|
Effect of dilutive options to purchase common stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of shares used to compute diluted loss
per share
|
|
|
57,891,024
|
|
|
|
46,837,066
|
|
|
|
34,426,353
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted loss per share
|
|
$
|
(0.70
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.64
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.02
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Due to the Companys net losses, unvested shares of
restricted stock (participating securities) totaling 1,959,828
and 489,178 were excluded from the calculation of basic and
diluted loss per share during the years ended June 30, 2011
and 2010, respectively. There were no shares of restricted stock
outstanding during the year ended June 30, 2009.
In addition, stock options (non-participating securities)
totaling 8,998,164, 8,234,060, and 5,362,310 during the years
ended June 30, 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively, were
excluded from the calculation of diluted loss per share as their
effect would have been anti-dilutive. Certain of these stock
options were excluded solely due to the Companys net loss
position. Had the Company reported net income during the years
ended June 30, 2011, 2010 and 2009, these shares would have
had an effect of 1,861,935, 2,316,360, and 237,610 diluted
shares, respectively, for purposes of calculating diluted loss
per share.
69
UNILIFE
CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
For the years ended June 30, 2011, 2010 and 2009, income
(loss) before income taxes consists of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Domestic
|
|
$
|
(41,529
|
)
|
|
$
|
(26,773
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,448
|
)
|
International
|
|
|
847
|
|
|
|
(2,975
|
)
|
|
|
931
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(40,682
|
)
|
|
$
|
(29,748
|
)
|
|
$
|
(517
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax
Rate Reconciliation
Income tax expense (benefit) is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
Current
|
|
|
Deferred
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Current
|
|
|
Deferred
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Current
|
|
|
Deferred
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
U.S. Federal
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(13,907
|
)
|
|
$
|
(13,907
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(8,692
|
)
|
|
$
|
(8,692
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(1,070
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,070
|
)
|
State
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,086
|
)
|
|
|
(4,086
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,554
|
)
|
|
|
(2,554
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(339
|
)
|
|
|
(339
|
)
|
International
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
279
|
|
|
|
279
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
553
|
|
|
|
553
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(663
|
)
|
|
|
(663
|
)
|
Changes in valuation allowance
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,714
|
|
|
|
17,714
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,693
|
|
|
|
10,693
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,072
|
|
|
|
2,072
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax provision
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax expense (benefit) was $0 for the years ended
June 30, 2011, 2010 and 2009 and differed from the amounts
computed by applying the U.S. federal income tax rate to
pretax income as a result of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Tax at U.S. statutory rate
|
|
|
(35
|
)%
|
|
|
(35
|
)%
|
|
|
(35
|
)%
|
State taxes, net of federal benefit
|
|
|
(10
|
)%
|
|
|
(9
|
)%
|
|
|
(11
|
)%
|
Non-deductible and non-taxable items
|
|
|
1
|
%
|
|
|
7
|
%
|
|
|
2
|
%
|
Change in valuation allowance
|
|
|
44
|
%
|
|
|
37
|
%
|
|
|
44
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0
|
%
|
|
|
0
|
%
|
|
|
0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
70
UNILIFE
CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
Significant
Components of Deferred Taxes
The tax effects of temporary differences and net operating
losses that give rise to significant portions of deferred tax
assets (liabilities) at June 30, 2011 and 2010 are
presented below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Net operating loss carryforwards
|
|
$
|
31,572
|
|
|
$
|
15,640
|
|
Share-based compensation expense
|
|
|
5,984
|
|
|
|
2,038
|
|
Deferred revenue
|
|
|
2,435
|
|
|
|
2,625
|
|
Depreciation differences
|
|
|
(677
|
)
|
|
|
(190
|
)
|
Valuation allowance
|
|
|
(39,314
|
)
|
|
|
(20,113
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred taxes
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The valuation allowance for deferred tax assets as of
June 30, 2011 and 2010 was $39.3 million and
$20.1 million, respectively. The net change in the total
valuation allowance was an increase of $19.2 million. In
assessing the realizability of deferred tax assets, management
considers whether it is more likely than not that some portion
or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. The
ultimate realization of deferred tax assets is dependent upon
the generation of future taxable income during the periods in
which those temporary differences become deductible or prior to
the expiration of the net operating loss carryforwards.
Management considers the scheduled reversal of deferred tax
liabilities (including the impact of available carryback and
carryforward periods), projected future taxable income, and
tax-planning strategies in making the assessment as to the
realizability of deferred tax assets. Based upon the level of
historical taxable income and uncertainty regarding projections
for future taxable income over the periods in which the deferred
tax assets are deductible or can be utilized, management does
not believe it is more likely than not that the Company will
realize the benefits of these net operating losses and
deductible temporary differences, as of June 30, 2011 and
2010. Therefore a full valuation allowance has been provided.
The amount of the net deferred tax assets considered realizable,
however, could change if estimates of future taxable income
during the carryforward period are increased.
As of June 30, 2011, the Company had net operating loss
carryforwards for U.S federal, state and Australian income tax
purposes of approximately $55.7 million, $55.7 million
and $23.5 million, respectively, which are available to
offset future taxable income. The U.S. federal and state
net operating loss carryforwards begin to expire in 2023. The
Australian net operating losses do not expire.
The Australian net operating loss carryforwards of approximately
$23.5 million as of June 30, 2011 are subject to
either the continuity of ownership or same business test (as
defined under Australian tax law) that could limit or
substantially eliminate the Companys ability to use these
carryforwards. If there have been or will be changes in the
Companys ownership or Australian business operations
before these net operating loss carryforwards are utilized, they
may be unavailable to reduce taxable income in the future.
Further, under provision of the Internal Revenue Code, the
utilization of a U.S corporations federal and state
net operating loss carryforwards may be significantly limited
following a change in ownership of greater than 50% within a
three-year period. The Companys federal and state net
operating loss carryforwards may, therefore, be subject to an
annual limitation. In addition, state net operating loss
carryforwards may be further limited in Pennsylvania, which has
a limitation equal to the greater of 20% of taxable income after
modifications and apportionment, or $3.0 million on state
net operating losses utilized in any one year.
The Company has adopted the provisions of Interpretation 48,
included in ASC Subtopic
740-10.
Management has evaluated the tax positions taken and has
concluded that no liability for unrecognized tax benefits was
required to be recorded for the years ended June 30, 2011,
2010 and 2009.
71
UNILIFE
CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
The Company files Australian, U.S. federal and state income
tax returns. The Company is not subject to examination in any
jurisdiction at this time. As a result of the net operating
losses in prior years, the statute of limitations will remain
open for a period following any utilization of net operating
loss carryforwards and as such these periods remain subject to
examination.
|
|
12.
|
Employee
Benefit Plan
|
The Company has a retirement savings 401(k) plan covering all
U.S. employees. Participating employees may contribute up
to 100% of their pre-tax earnings, subject to the statutory
limits. During the years ended June 30, 2011, 2010 and
2009, the Company did not match any employee contributions.
Sanofi
The Company signed an exclusive licensing agreement and an
industrialization agreement with Sanofi, a multinational
pharmaceutical company, between June 2008 and July 2009. Under
the terms of these agreements, Sanofi has agreed to pay the
Company an aggregate of approximately $36.4 million in
exclusivity fees and industrialization milestone payments for
the exclusive right to negotiate the purchase of the Unifill
ready-to-fill
(prefilled) syringe (Unifill syringe or product).
Pursuant to the exclusive licensing agreement, Sanofi has paid
the Company a 10.0 million euro ($13.0 million) up
front non-refundable one-time fee. During the year ended
June 30, 2009, the Company recognized $2.5 million of
this up-front payment as revenue and deferred
$10.6 million, which is being recognized on a straight-line
basis over the remaining term of the agreement.
Pursuant to the industrialization agreement, Sanofi has agreed
to pay the Company up to 17.0 million euros
($23.4 million) in milestone-based payments to fund the
completion of the Companys industrialization program for
the Unifill syringe. As of June 30, 2011 there is one
remaining milestone payment of 1.0 million euro to be
recognized under the industrialization agreement.
This exclusive right for Sanofi to negotiate for the purchase of
the Unifill syringe is limited to the therapeutic drug classes
of anti-thrombotic agents, vaccines and four confidential
sub-classes
until June 30, 2014 (exclusivity list). The Company is able
to negotiate with other pharmaceutical companies seeking to
utilize the Unifill syringe with drugs targeted for use in
therapeutic drug classes outside of those retained by Sanofi
under its exclusivity list. Upon mutual agreement by both
parties, Sanofi may add additional therapeutic
sub-classes
to the exclusivity list for the Unifill syringe provided the
Company has not previously signed exclusive terms for the
product to a third party. The Company is not obligated to sell
more than 30% of its annual production capacity for the Unifill
syringe to Sanofi without written notification up to two years
in advance.
Stason
Pharmaceuticals
In March 2010, the Company signed an exclusive five year
agreement with Stason Pharmaceuticals, a U.S. based
pharmaceutical company, to market its Unitract 1mL syringe in
Japan, China and Taiwan. Under the agreement, Stason
Pharmaceuticals is required to purchase a minimum of
1.0 million units of the Unitract 1mL syringe per year
during the term of the contract, subject to regulatory approval
of the Unitract 1mL in those markets, which is currently pending.
72
UNILIFE
CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
|
|
14.
|
Financial
Instruments
|
The Company does not hold or issue financial instruments for
trading purposes. The estimated fair values of the
Companys financial instruments are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2011
|
|
June 30, 2010
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
Estimated
|
|
Carrying
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
Amount
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
Assets :
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash equivalents certificates of deposit
|
|
$
|
1,000
|
|
|
$
|
1,000
|
|
|
$
|
18,629
|
|
|
$
|
18,629
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The carrying amount of the Companys cash equivalents,
which includes certificates of deposit, accounts receivable,
accounts payable and accrued expenses approximate their fair
value due to the short term maturities of these items. The
estimated fair value of the Companys debt approximates its
carrying value based upon the rates that the Company would
currently be able to receive for similar instruments of
comparable maturity.
The Company categorizes its assets and liabilities measured at
fair value into a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the
inputs used in pricing the asset or liability. The three levels
of the fair value hierarchy are as follows:
Level 1 Quoted prices in active markets
for identical assets or liabilities.
Level 2 Observable inputs other than
quoted prices included in Level 1, such as quoted prices
for similar assets and liabilities in active markets; quoted
prices for identical or similar assets and liabilities in
markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable
or can be corroborated by observable market data.
Level 3 Unobservable inputs that are
supported by little or no market activity and that are
significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities. This
includes certain pricing models, discounted cash flow
methodologies and similar techniques that use significant
unobservable inputs.
The levels in the fair value hierarchy within which a fair value
measurement in its entirety falls is based on the lowest level
input that is significant to the fair value measurement in its
entirety.
The following table presents the Companys assets that are
measured at fair value on a recurring basis for the periods
presented:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Based On
|
|
|
Quoted Market
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prices in Active
|
|
Significant
|
|
Significant
|
|
|
|
|
Markets for
|
|
Other
|
|
Unobservable
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Identical Assets
|
|
Observable Inputs
|
|
Inputs
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
(Level 1)
|
|
(Level 2)
|
|
(Level 3)
|
|
Measurements
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Cash equivalents certificates of deposit
(June 30, 2011)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,000
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash equivalents certificates of deposit
(June 30, 2010)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
18,629
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
18,629
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
73
UNILIFE
CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
|
|
15.
|
Quarterly
Results (unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended
|
|
Quarter Ended
|
|
Quarter Ended
|
|
Quarter Ended
|
|
|
September 30, 2010
|
|
December 31, 2010
|
|
March 31, 2011
|
|
June 30, 2011
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share data)
|
|
Year Ended June 30, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$
|
3,543
|
|
|
$
|
1,762
|
|
|
$
|
650
|
|
|
$
|
695
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
2,368
|
|
|
|
938
|
|
|
|
200
|
|
|
|
547
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
(7,246
|
)
|
|
|
(10,358
|
)
|
|
|
(12,533
|
)
|
|
|
(10,545
|
)
|
Basic and diluted loss per share
|
|
$
|
(0.14
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.19
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.20
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.17
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended
|
|
Quarter Ended
|
|
Quarter Ended
|
|
Quarter Ended
|
|
|
September 30, 2009
|
|
December 31, 2009
|
|
March 31, 2010
|
|
June 30, 2010
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share data)
|
|
Year Ended June 30, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$
|
3,108
|
|
|
$
|
3,245
|
|
|
$
|
2,417
|
|
|
$
|
2,652
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
2,279
|
|
|
|
2,771
|
|
|
|
1,885
|
|
|
|
2,016
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
(2,064
|
)
|
|
|
(5,915
|
)
|
|
|
(12,064
|
)
|
|
|
(9,705
|
)
|
Basic and diluted loss per share
|
|
$
|
(0.06
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.13
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.23
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.18
|
)
|
Per share amounts for the quarters may not add to the annual
amount due to differences in the weighted average common shares
outstanding during the periods.
On August 15, 2011, the Company entered into a Master Lease
Agreement with Varilease Finance, Inc. (Varilease).
Under the Master Lease Agreement, Varilease will provide up to
$10.0 million of lease financing for production equipment
for the Unifill
ready-to-fill
syringe. The Company has the option of selling and leasing back
existing equipment or using the facility to lease additional
equipment.
Under the terms of the Master Lease Agreement, the Company will
lease the equipment from Varilease for a two-year base term, and
the Company will pay rent in equal monthly installments of up to
$0.4 million over the base term.
The Master Lease Agreement contains covenants and provisions for
events of default customarily found in lease agreements. The
Company may prepay the monthly rent payments without penalty. At
the end of the lease term, the Company has the option to extend
the lease, return the equipment or purchase the equipment, as
defined in the agreement.
74
|
|
Item 9.
|
Changes
in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and
Financial Disclosure
|
None.
|
|
Item 9A.
|
Controls
and Procedures
|
Disclosure
Controls and Procedures
Our management, with the participation of our Chief Executive
Officer and our Chief Financial Officer, performed an evaluation
of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Rules 13a-15(e)
and
15d-15(e) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Exchange Act))
as of the end of the period covered by this Annual Report on
Form 10-K.
Our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer have
concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were
effective insofar as they are designed to ensure that
information required to be disclosed by us in the reports we
file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed,
summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in
the Commissions rules and forms, and they include, without
limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that
information required to be disclosed by us in the reports we
file or submit under the Exchange Act is accumulated and
communicated to our management, including our principal
executive and principal financial officers, or persons
performing similar functions, as appropriate to allow timely
decisions regarding required disclosure.
Managements Report on Internal Control over Financial
Reporting and the Report of Independent Registered Public
Accounting Firm is included in Item 8 of this Annual Report
on
Form 10-K.
Changes
in Internal Control
There has not been any change in our internal control over
financial reporting (as such term is defined in
Rules 13a-15(f)
and 15d 15(f) under the Exchange Act) during the
fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2011 that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our
internal control over financial reporting.
|
|
Item 9B.
|
Other
Information
|
None.
|
|
Item 10.
|
Directors,
Executive Officers and Corporate Governance
|
The information required by this Item 10 regarding
directors and corporate governance is incorporated by reference
to our definitive proxy statement for our 2011 Annual Meeting of
Stockholders (the 2011 Proxy Statement) under the
headings Election of Directors and Information
on our Board of Directors and Corporate Governance.
Information regarding executive officers is set forth in
Item 1 of Part I of this Report under the caption
Executive Officers.
|
|
Item 11.
|
Executive
Compensation
|
The information required by this Item 11 is incorporated by
reference to the 2011 Proxy Statement under the headings of
Executive Compensation and Director
Compensation.
|
|
Item 12.
|
Security
Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and
Related Stockholder Matters
|
Except as set forth below, the information required by
Item 12 is incorporated by reference to the 2011 Proxy
Statement under the heading Security Ownership of Certain
Beneficial Owners and Management, Equity
Compensation Plan Information, and Equity
Compensation Plan Information.
75
ASX-Required
Disclosure
Corporations
Act 2001 (Cth) and Repurchases of Securities
We are not subject to Chapters 6, 6A, 6B and 6C of the
Corporations Act dealing with the acquisition of our shares (in
particular, relating to substantial shareholdings and takeovers).
Under the Delaware General Corporation Law, we are generally
permitted to purchase or redeem our outstanding shares out of
funds legally available for that purpose without obtaining
stockholder approval, provided that (i) our capital is not
impaired; (ii) such purchase or redemption would not cause
our capital to become impaired; (iii) the purchase price
does not exceed the price at which the shares are redeemable at
our option and (iv) immediately following any such
redemption, we shall have outstanding one or more shares of one
or more classes or series of stock, which shares shall have full
voting powers. Our certificate of incorporation does not create
any further limitation on our purchase or redemption of our
shares.
Australian
Disclosure Requirements
As part of our ASX listing, we are required to comply with
various disclosure requirements as set out under the ASX Listing
Rules. The following information is intended to comply with the
ASX Listing Rules and is not intended to fulfill information
required by this Annual Report on
Form 10-K.
Comparative
Performance Graph
The performance graph shown below compares the change in
cumulative total stockholder return of Unilife
Corporations Chess Depository Interest (CDI), the ASX All
Ordinaries Index and the S&P/ASX 200 Health Care Index for
the five year period ended June 30, 2011. The graph sets
the beginning value of shares of CDIs and the indices at $100,
and assumes that all quarterly dividends were reinvested at the
time of payment. This graph does not forecast future performance
of shares of the Companys common stock or CDIs.
76
Distribution
of Common Stock and CDI Holders as of September 1,
2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
CDIs
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Shares of
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
|
Holders
|
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
|
Holders
|
|
|
CDIs
|
|
|
1 1,000
|
|
|
163
|
|
|
|
50,850
|
|
|
|
1,396
|
|
|
|
747,030
|
|
1,001 5,000
|
|
|
62
|
|
|
|
140,415
|
|
|
|
2,580
|
|
|
|
7,561,548
|
|
5,001 10,000
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
91,027
|
|
|
|
1,263
|
|
|
|
10,022,720
|
|
10,001 100,000
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
1,137,433
|
|
|
|
2,712
|
|
|
|
86,511,951
|
|
100,001 and over
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
62,658,133
|
|
|
|
478
|
|
|
|
160,943,796
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
278
|
|
|
|
64,077,858
|
|
|
|
8,429
|
|
|
|
265,787,045
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The number of stockholders holding less than a marketable parcel
of shares was 863 as of September 1, 2011.
There is no current on-market buy-back of the Companys
securities.
Twenty
Largest CDI Holders as of September 9, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
% of CDIs
|
|
Rank
|
|
|
Name
|
|
CDIs Held
|
|
|
Outstanding
|
|
|
|
1.
|
|
|
Merkaba Limited
|
|
|
7,263,588
|
|
|
|
2.74
|
|
|
2.
|
|
|
National Nominees Limited
|
|
|
5,289,512
|
|
|
|
2.00
|
|
|
3.
|
|
|
J P Morgan Nominees Australia Limited
|
|
|
4,560,594
|
|
|
|
1.72
|
|
|
4.
|
|
|
Admark Investments Pty Ltd <JS Pinto Super
Fund A/C>
|
|
|
3,937,047
|
|
|
|
1.49
|
|
|
5.
|
|
|
Joseph Kaal
|
|
|
3,833,990
|
|
|
|
1.45
|
|
|
6.
|
|
|
Penila Investments Pty Ltd <Hornung S/F A/C>
|
|
|
3,657,799
|
|
|
|
1.38
|
|
|
7.
|
|
|
Mr Bradley Gavin Downes
|
|
|
3,014,169
|
|
|
|
1.14
|
|
|
8.
|
|
|
Mr Dennis Banks + Mrs Janine Banks <Banks Super
Fund A/C>
|
|
|
2,580,591
|
|
|
|
0.97
|
|
|
9.
|
|
|
Citicorp Nominees Pty Limited
|
|
|
2,457,850
|
|
|
|
0.93
|
|
|
10.
|
|
|
Thorley Management Pty Ltd <Thorley Investment A/C>
|
|
|
2,322,498
|
|
|
|
0.88
|
|
|
11.
|
|
|
Omah Nominees Pty Ltd <The PJH A/C>
|
|
|
2,017,645
|
|
|
|
0.76
|
|
|
12.
|
|
|
Mr Dennis John Banks <The Banks Family A/C>
|
|
|
1,919,671
|
|
|
|
0.72
|
|
|
13.
|
|
|
ABN Amro Clearing Sydney Nominees Pty Ltd <Custodian
A/C>
|
|
|
1,841,026
|
|
|
|
0.69
|
|
|
14.
|
|
|
JP Morgan Nominees Australia Limited <Cash Income A/C>
|
|
|
1,673,814
|
|
|
|
0.63
|
|
|
15.
|
|
|
J & N Kaal Pty Ltd <Kaal Superfund A/C>
|
|
|
1,585,365
|
|
|
|
0.60
|
|
|
16.
|
|
|
Hertogs Investments Pty Limited
|
|
|
1,400,000
|
|
|
|
0.53
|
|
|
17.
|
|
|
Mr Peter Marcus Barr + Mrs Kay Ellen Barr <Regnal Super
Fund A/C>
|
|
|
1,322,427
|
|
|
|
0.50
|
|
|
18.
|
|
|
Mirrabooka Investments Limited
|
|
|
1,200,000
|
|
|
|
0.45
|
|
|
19.
|
|
|
KAS Investments & Development Pty Ltd <KAS
Investments S/F A/C>
|
|
|
1,054,890
|
|
|
|
0.40
|
|
|
20.
|
|
|
Mrs. Cherie Ann Lauder + Mr. John William Lauder <J&C
Lauder Family S/F A/C>
|
|
|
1,013,234
|
|
|
|
0.38
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
53,945,910
|
|
|
|
20.36
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General
Information
The name of the Company Secretary is Mr. J. Christopher
Naftzger.
The complete mailing address, including zip code, of our
principal executive offices is 250 Cross Farm Lane, York,
Pennsylvania 17406.
77
The address of the principal registered office in Australia is
Suite 3, Level 1, 1 Chifley Square, Sydney NSW 2000
and our telephone number there is +61 2 8346 6500. The ASX
Liaison Officer is Mr. Jeff Carter.
Registers of securities are held at Computershare Investor
Services Pty Limited, Level 2, 45 St Georges Terrace Perth
WA 6000 Australia, Investor Enquiries +61 8 9323 2000 (within
Australia) +61 3 9415 4677 (outside Australia).
Voting
Rights
Unilifes by-laws provide that each stockholder has one
vote for every share of common stock entitled to vote held of
record by such stockholder and a proportionate vote for each
fractional share of stock entitled to vote so held, unless
otherwise provided by Delaware General Corporation Law or in the
certificate of incorporation.
If holders of CDIs wish to attend Unilifes general
meetings, they will be able to do so. Under the ASX Listing
Rules, Unilife, as an issuer of CDIs, must allow CDI holders to
attend any meeting of the holders of the underlying securities
unless relevant U.S. law at the time of the meeting
prevents CDI holders from attending those meetings.
In order to vote at such meetings, CDI holders have the
following options:
(a) instructing CDN, as the legal owner, to vote the
Unilife Shares underlying their CDIs in a particular manner. The
instruction form must be completed and returned to
Unilifes share registry prior to the meeting;
(b) informing Unilife that they wish to nominate themselves
or another person to be appointed as CDNs proxy for the
purposes of attending and voting at the general meeting;
(c) converting their CDIs into a holding of Unilife and
voting these at the meeting (however, if thereafter the former
CDI holder wishes to sell their investment on ASX, it would be
necessary to convert Unilife Shares back to CDIs).
As holders of CDIs will not appear on Unilifes share
register as the legal holders of Unilife Shares, they will not
be entitled to vote at a Unilife stockholder meetings unless one
of the above steps is undertaken.
Proxy forms and details of these alternatives will be included
in each notice of meeting sent to CDI holders by Unilife.
Holders of options are not entitled to vote.
Australian
Corporate Governance Statement
The Board of Directors and employees of Unilife Corporation
(Unilife or the Company) are committed
to developing, promoting and maintaining a strong culture of
good corporate governance and ethical conduct.
The Board of Directors confirms that the Companys
corporate governance framework is generally consistent with the
Australian Securities Exchanges (ASX)
Corporate Governance Councils Corporate Governance
Principles and Recommendations (2nd Edition)
(ASX Governance Recommendations), other than as set
out below. To this end, the Company provides below a review of
its governance framework using the same numbering as adopted for
the Principles as set out in the ASX Governance Recommendations.
Copies of the Companys charters, codes and policies may be
downloaded from the corporate governance section of the Unilife
website (www.unilife.com).
The Company redomiciled to the United States in January 2010 and
listed on Nasdaq in February 2010. As a result and to meet
Nasdaq listing requirements, the policies and practices adopted
by the Company are predominantly
U.S.-focused.
78
Principle
1 Lay solid foundations for management and
oversight
Recommendation
1.1 Establish the functions reserved to the board
and those delegated to senior executives and disclose those
functions
The primary responsibility of:
(a) the Board of Directors is to exercise their business
judgment to act in what they reasonably believe to be in the
best interests of the Company and its stockholders; and
(b) the Chief Executive Officer is to oversee the
day-to-day
performance of Unilife (pursuant to Board delegated powers).
The Boards responsibilities are recognized and documented
on an aggregated basis via the Charter of the Board of
Directors, which is available on the corporate governance
section of the Companys website.
While
day-to-day
management has been delegated to the Chief Executive Officer, it
is noted that the following matters are specifically reserved
for the attention of the Board:
(a) providing input into and final approval of
managements development of corporate strategy and
performance objectives;
(b) reviewing, ratifying and monitoring systems of risk
management and internal control, codes of conduct, and legal
compliance;
(c) ensuring appropriate resources are available to senior
executives;
(d) approving and monitoring the progress of major capital
expenditure, capital management and acquisitions and
divestments; and
(e) approving and monitoring financial and other reporting.
Recommendation
1.2 Disclose the process for evaluating the
performance of senior executives
Information regarding executive compensation required by
Item 11 of
Form 10-K,
including a discussion in relation to the mechanics concerning
the evaluation of performance of the Companys senior
executives, including relevant benchmarking activities, will be
contained in the 2011 Proxy Statement under the caption
Executive Compensation, and is incorporated by
reference.
Recommendation
1.3 Disclosure of information under Principle 1 of
the ASX Governance Recommendations
Reporting
Requirement
The Company fully complied with Recommendation 1.1 to 1.3 during
the fiscal year ended June 30, 2011.
Principle
2 Structure the Board to add value
Recommendation
2.1 A majority of the board should be independent
directors
Recommendation
2.2 The chair should be an independent
director
Recommendation
2.3 The roles of Chairman and Chief Executive
Officer should not be exercised by the same individual
The Board of Directors is currently comprised of seven
directors. The seven directors include six non-executive
directors (including the Chairman of the Board) and one
executive director (being the Chief Executive Officer) with the
role of Chairman and Chief Executive Officer being exercised by
different individuals. Five of the six non-executive directors
are independent as defined in the Nasdaq listing
rules.
At the Companys expense, the Board collectively or
directors (acting as individuals) are entitled to seek advice
from independent external advisers in relation to any matter
which is considered necessary to fulfill their
79
relevant duties and responsibilities. Individual directors
seeking such advice must obtain the approval of the Chairman.
Any advice so obtained will be made available to the Board.
Recommendation
2.4 The board should establish a nomination
committee
The Company has established a Nominating and Corporate
Governance Committee which consists of all independent directors
(including the Chairman of the Nominating and Corporate
Governance Committee).The members of the Nominating and
Corporate Governance Committee are Mr. Bosnjak,
Mr. Lund, Mr. Galle and Mr. Firestone (Chair). A
copy of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee
Charter is available on the corporate governance section of the
Companys website.
Reporting
Requirement
The Company fully complied with Recommendation 2.1 to 2.4 during
the fiscal year ended June 30, 2011.
Recommendation
2.5 Disclose the process for evaluating the
performance of the Board, its committees and individual
directors
Reporting
Requirement
In connection with its upcoming 2011 Proxy Statement, the
Corporate Governance & Nominating Committee has
undertaken a formal review of the performance of the Board, its
committees and individual directors, which will be completed
prior to the nomination of the slate of the board of directors
for the upcoming proxy.
Recommendation
2.6 Disclosure of information under Principle 2 of
the ASX Governance Recommendations
Reporting
Requirement
Information regarding our directors, including biographical
information and share ownership information required by
Items 10 and 12 of
Form 10-K
will be included in the 2011 Proxy Statement under the captions
Election of Directors and Security Ownership
of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management.
Principle
3 Promote ethical and responsible
decision-making
Recommendation
3.1 Establish a Code of Conduct and disclose
it.
The Company has adopted a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics
which is available on the corporate governance section of the
Companys website.
Recommendation
3.2 Establish a policy concerning trading in Company
securities by directors, senior executives and employees and
disclose it
The Company has adopted an Insider Trading Policy which is
available on the corporate governance section of the
Companys website.
Recommendation
3.3 Disclosure of information under Principle 3 of
the ASX Governance Recommendations
Reporting
Requirement
The Company fully complied with Recommendation 3.1 to 3.3 during
the fiscal year ended June 30, 2011.
80
Principle
4 Safeguard integrity in financial
reporting
Recommendation
4.1 The Board should establish an Audit
Committee
Recommendation
4.2 The Audit Committee should: (a) consist of
non-executive directors only; (b) consist of a majority of
independent directors; (c) be chaired by an independent
chair who is not chair of the Board; and (d) have at least
three members
Recommendation
4.3 The Audit Committee should have a formal
charter
The Company has established an Audit Committee which consists
only of non-executive directors all of whom are independent
(including the Chairman of the Audit Committee). The members of
the Audit Committee are Mr. Bosnjak, Mr. Lund (Chair)
and Ms. Wold.
The Audit Committee Charter is available on the corporate
governance section of the Companys website.
Reporting
Requirement
The Company fully complied with Recommendation 4.1 to 4.3 during
the fiscal year ended June 30, 2011.
Recommendation
4.4 Disclosure of information under Principle 4 of
the ASX Governance Recommendations
Reporting
Requirement
Information regarding the skills, experience and expertise of
directors, including audit committee members in accordance with
U.S disclosure requirements, will be included in the 2011 Proxy
Statement.
In Item 9A of this Annual Report on
Form 10-K,
we have disclosed information regarding the Companys
Controls and Procedures, including managements evaluation
of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures
and managements evaluation of the effectiveness of our
internal control over financial reporting.
Principle
5 Make timely and balanced disclosure
Recommendation
5.1 Establish written policies designed to ensure
compliance with ASX Listing Rule disclosure requirements and to
ensure accountability at a senior executive level for that
compliance and disclose those policies
Recommendation
5.2 Disclosure of information under Principle 5 of
the ASX Governance Recommendations
Unilife is committed to providing timely and balanced disclosure
to the market and, in consequence, to meeting its continuous
disclosure requirements. The Company established a Disclosure
Committee for the purpose of ensuring significant matters
requiring public disclosure are communicated to management and
disclosed in a timely manner.
In accordance with its commitment to fully comply with its
continuous disclosure requirements, the Company has adopted a
Continuous Disclosure Policy, together with other internal
mechanisms and reporting requirements.
Reporting
Requirement
The Company fully complied with Recommendation 5.1 and 5.2
during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2011.
81
Principle
6 Respect the rights of shareholders
Recommendation
6.1 Design a communications policy for promoting
effective communication with shareholders and encourage their
participation at stockholders meetings and disclose those
policies
Recommendation
6.2 Disclosure of information under Principle 6 of
the ASX Governance Recommendations
While the Company has not adopted a formal communications policy
as recommended under Recommendation 6.1, the Company
communicates information to shareholders through a range of
media including annual reports, public (ASX and SEC)
announcements and via the Companys website. Key financial
information and stock performance are also available on the
Companys website. Shareholders can raise questions with
the Company by contacting the Company via telephone, facsimile,
post or email, with relevant contact details being available on
the Companys website.
All shareholders are invited to attend the Companys Annual
Meeting of Stockholders, either in person or by proxy. The Board
regards the Annual Meeting as an excellent forum in which to
discuss issues relevant to the Company and thereby encourages
full participation by shareholders. Shareholders have an
opportunity to submit questions to the Board and the
Companys auditors. The meeting is also webcast to provide
access to those shareholders who are unable to attend the Annual
Meeting.
Reporting
requirement
Save as set out above, the Company fully complied with
Recommendation 6.1 and 6.2 for the fiscal year ended
June 30, 2011.
Principle
7 Recognize and manage risk
Recommendation
7.1 Establish policies for the oversight and
management of material business risks and disclose it
The risks that the Company faces are continually changing in
line with the development of the Company. The primary risks
faced by the Company during the fiscal year ended June 30,
2011 included liquidity or funding risk and operational risks
associated with the finalization of the Companys
industrialization of its Unifill syringe.
The Company operates in an environment where it is required to
actively manage fundamental risks such as the integrity of the
Companys intellectual property portfolio, disaster
management, exchange rate risk and the risk of losing key
management personnel.
In simple terms, risk is inherent in all business activities
undertaken by Unilife. Unfortunately, many of these risks are
beyond the control of the Company and, as such, it is important
that risk be mitigated on a continuous basis, particularly if
the Company is to preserve shareholder value.
The Board of Directors has approved a Risk Management Policy,
which is designed to ensure that risks including, amongst
others, technology risks, economic risks, financial risks and
other operational risks are identified, evaluated and mitigated
to enable the achievement of the Companys goals.
Reporting
requirement
The Company fully complied with Recommendation 7.1 for the
fiscal year ended June 30, 2011.
Recommendation
7.2 Require management to design and implement the
risk management and internal control system to manage the
Companys material business risks and report to it whether
those risks are being managed effectively (and makes disclosures
therein); Disclose that management has reported to the Board as
to the effectiveness of the Companys management of its
material business risks
Management provides the Board with frequent (i.e. generally
monthly) updates on the state of the Companys business,
including the risks that the Company faces from
time-to-time.
This update includes
up-to-date
financial information, operational activity, clinical status and
competitor updates. These updates are founded on internal
82
communications that are fostered internally through weekly
management meetings and other internal communications. These
processes operate in addition to the Companys Quality
System, complaint handling processes, employee policies and
standard operating procedures.
The Risk Management Policy also requires that, the Chief
Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer will, at least
on an annual basis, provide written assurances to the Board in
writing that:
|
|
|
|
|
all assurances given by management in respect of the integrity
of financial statements are founded on sound systems of risk
management and internal compliance and control which implements
the policies adopted by the Board; and
|
|
|
|
the Companys risk management and internal compliance and
control system is operating efficiently and effectively in all
material respects.
|
In addition, the Board of Directors holds regular meetings for
the purposes of discussing and reviewing operational
developments.
The Company fully complied with Recommendation 7.2 for the
fiscal year ended June 30, 2011.
Recommendation
7.3 Disclose whether the Board has received
assurance from the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief
Financial Officer that the declaration under Section 295A
of the Corporations Act is founded on a sound system of risk
management and internal control and is operating effectively in
all material respects in relation to financial reporting
risks
Reporting
requirement
As the Company prepares and files its financial statements under
U.S. accounting practices and laws, management is required
to provide representations to the Board on a wide range of
issues, including in relation to the effectiveness of the
Companys disclosure controls and procedures as well as the
design or operation of internal control over financial
reporting. However, as the Company is incorporated in the US and
is not bound by certain financial reporting provisions under the
Australian Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) no declaration is
required under Section 295A of the Corporations Act. To
this end, shareholders attention is drawn to Item 9A.
of this Annual Report on
Form 10-K
and the certifications provided by the Chief Executive Officer
and the Chief Financial Officer at the end of the
Form 10-K.
As stated above, Item 9A of this Annual Report on
Form 10-K
discloses information regarding the Companys controls and
procedures, including managements evaluation of the
effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures and
managements evaluation of the effectiveness of our
internal control over financial reporting.
For the reasons stated above, the Company has complied with
Recommendation 7.3 for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2011.
Recommendation
7.4 Disclosure of information under Principle 7 of
the ASX Governance Recommendations
Reporting
requirement
Except as disclosed above, the Company believes that the
aforementioned reporting meets, or exceeds, the requirements of
Recommendation 7.2 to 7.4 for the fiscal year ended
June 30, 2011.
Principle
8 Remunerate fairly and responsibly
Recommendation
8.1 Establish a Remuneration Committee
The Company has established a Compensation Committee which
consists of solely independent directors (including the Chairman
of the Compensation Committee). The members of the Compensation
Committee are Mr. Bosnjak (Chair), Mr. Galle and
Mr. Lund. A copy of the Compensation Committee Charter is
available on the corporate governance section of the
Companys website.
83
Recommendation
8.2 Clearly distinguish the structure of
non-executive directors remuneration from that of
executive directors and senior executives
As noted above in the discussion regarding Recommendation 1.2,
Item 11 of this Annual Report on
Form 10-K
includes disclosure relating to the structure of non-executive
directors, executive directors and senior executives
remuneration practices and policies, including its annual
performance review process, its external benchmarking review and
its meritorious approach to employee performance.
Reporting
requirement
As previously disclosed no review or other form of assessment
has been undertaken in relation to the directors.
Recommendation
8.3 Disclosure of information under Principle 8 of
the ASX Governance Recommendations
With the exception noted above, the Company complied with the
Recommendation 8.1 to 8.3 during the year ended
June 30,2011.
This report is made in accordance with a resolution of the Board
of Directors.
|
|
Item 13.
|
Certain
Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director
Independence
|
The information required by this Item 13 is incorporated by
reference to the 2011 Proxy Statement under the headings
Information on our Board of Directors and Corporate
Governance and Certain Relationships and Related
Transactions.
|
|
Item 14.
|
Principal
Accountant Fees and Services
|
The information required by this Item 14 is incorporated
into this report by reference to the 2011 Proxy Statement under
the heading Ratification of Appointment of the Independent
Registered Public Accounting Firm.
|
|
Item 15.
|
Exhibits
and Financial Statement Schedules
|
(a) Documents files as part of this report:
(1) Financial Statements
The financial statements required by this Item 15 are set
forth in Part II, Item 8 of this report.
(b) Exhibits. The following Exhibits are filed as a part of
this report
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
|
Included
|
|
Incorporated by Reference Herein
|
No.
|
|
Description of Exhibit
|
|
Herewith
|
|
Form
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
Filing Date
|
|
|
2
|
.1
|
|
Amended and Restated Merger Implementation Agreement dated as of
September 1, 2009 between Unilife Medical Solutions Limited
and Unilife Corporation
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
2
|
.1
|
|
February 11, 2010
|
|
2
|
.2
|
|
Share Purchase Agreement among Unilife Medical Solutions
Limited, Edward Paukovits, Jr., Keith Bocchicchio, and Daniel
Adlon dated as of October 25, 2006 and amended as of
September 26, 2007
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
2
|
.2
|
|
January 6, 2010
|
|
3
|
.1
|
|
Certificate of Incorporation of Unilife Corporation
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
3
|
.1
|
|
November 12, 2009
|
|
3
|
.2
|
|
Amended and Restated Bylaws of Unilife Corporation
|
|
|
|
8-K
|
|
|
3
|
.1
|
|
August 17, 2010
|
84
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
|
Included
|
|
Incorporated by Reference Herein
|
No.
|
|
Description of Exhibit
|
|
Herewith
|
|
Form
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
Filing Date
|
|
|
4
|
.1
|
|
Form of Common Stock Certificate
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
4
|
.1
|
|
November 12, 2009
|
|
10
|
.1
|
|
Exclusive Agreement dated as of June 30, 2008 between
Unilife Medical Solutions Limited and Sanofi Winthrop Industrie
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
10
|
.1
|
|
November 12, 2009
|
|
10
|
.2*
|
|
First Amendment dated as of June 29, 2009 to Exclusive
Agreement dated as of June 30, 2008 between Unilife Medical
Solutions Limited and Sanofi Winthrop Industrie
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
10
|
.2
|
|
November 12, 2009
|
|
10
|
.3*
|
|
Industrialization Agreement dated as of June 30, 2009
between Unilife Medical Solutions Limited and Sanofi Winthrop
Industrie
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
10
|
.3
|
|
February 6, 2010
|
|
10
|
.4
|
|
Business Lease, dated as of August 17, 2005, between
Integrated BioSciences, Inc. and AMC Delancey Heartland
Partners, L.P.
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
10
|
.4
|
|
November 12, 2009
|
|
10
|
.5
|
|
Agreement dated as of September 15, 2003 between Integrated
BioSciences, Inc. and B. Braun Medical, Inc. and amendments
thereto
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
10
|
.5
|
|
February 1, 2010
|
|
10
|
.6
|
|
Promissory Note, dated as of December 30, 2005 between
Integrated BioSciences, Inc. and Commerce Bank
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
10
|
.6
|
|
November 12, 2009
|
|
10
|
.7
|
|
Promissory Note, dated as of August 25, 2006 between
Integrated BioSciences, Inc. and Commerce Bank
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
10
|
.7
|
|
November 12, 2009
|
|
10
|
.8
|
|
Employment Agreement, dated as of October 26, 2008 between
Unilife Medical Solutions Limited and Alan Shortall
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
10
|
.8
|
|
November 12, 2009
|
|
10
|
.9
|
|
Employment Agreement, dated as of February 15, 2005 between
Unilife Medical Solutions Limited and Jeff Carter
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
10
|
.9
|
|
November 12, 2009
|
|
10
|
.10
|
|
Employment Agreement, dated as of November 10, 2009 between
Unilife Medical Solutions, Inc. and Daniel Calvert
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
10
|
.10
|
|
November 12, 2009
|
|
10
|
.11
|
|
Employment Agreement, dated as of November 10, 2009 between
Unilife Medical Solutions, Inc. and Bernhard Opitz
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
10
|
.11
|
|
November 12, 2009
|
|
10
|
.12
|
|
Employment Agreement, dated as of November 10, 2009 between
Unilife Medical Solutions, Inc. and Mark Iampietro
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
10
|
.12
|
|
November 12, 2009
|
|
10
|
.13
|
|
Employment Agreement, dated as of November 10, 2009 between
Unilife Medical Solutions, Inc. and Stephen Allan
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
10
|
.13
|
|
November 12, 2009
|
|
10
|
.14
|
|
Employment Agreement, dated as of November 10, 2009 between
Unilife Medical Solutions, Inc. and Eugene Shortall
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
10
|
.14
|
|
November 12, 2009
|
|
10
|
.15
|
|
Consulting Agreement, dated as of January 22, 2009 between
Unilife Medical Solutions Limited and Joblak Pty Ltd
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
10
|
.15
|
|
November 12, 2009
|
|
10
|
.16
|
|
Deed of Mutual Release, dated January 12, 2009 between
Unilife Medical Solutions Limited and Jeff Carter
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
10
|
.16
|
|
November 12, 2009
|
85
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
|
Included
|
|
Incorporated by Reference Herein
|
No.
|
|
Description of Exhibit
|
|
Herewith
|
|
Form
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
Filing Date
|
|
|
10
|
.17
|
|
Unilife Corporation Employee Stock Option Plan
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
10
|
.17
|
|
November 12, 2009
|
|
10
|
.18
|
|
Unilife Corporation 2009 Stock Incentive Plan
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
10
|
.18
|
|
November 12, 2009
|
|
10
|
.19
|
|
Unilife Medical Solutions Limited Exempt Employee Share Plan
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
10
|
.19
|
|
November 12, 2009
|
|
10
|
.20
|
|
Agreement dated November 12, 2009 between Unilife Medical
Solutions, Inc. and Mikron Assembly Technology
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
10
|
.20
|
|
February 10, 2010
|
|
10
|
.21
|
|
Purchase and Mutual Indemnification Agreement dated
November 16, 2009 between Unilife Cross Farm LLC and
Greenspring Partners, LP
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
10
|
.21
|
|
January 6, 2010
|
|
10
|
.22
|
|
Offer of assistance dated October 16, 2009 from the
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania to Unilife Medical Solutions and
acceptance of the offer
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
10
|
.22
|
|
January 6, 2010
|
|
10
|
.23
|
|
Agreement Between Unilife Cross Farm LLC and L2 Architecture
dated as of December 29, 2009, as amended
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
10
|
.23
|
|
January 6, 2010
|
|
10
|
.24
|
|
Agreement between Unilife Cross Farm LLC and HSC
Builders & Construction Managers dated as of
December 14, 2009, as amended
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
10
|
.24
|
|
January 6, 2010
|
|
10
|
.25
|
|
Development Agreement, dated December 14, 2009 between
Unilife Cross Farm LLC and Keystone Redevelopment Group LLC
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
10
|
.25
|
|
February 1, 2010
|
|
10
|
.26
|
|
Amended and Restated Operating Agreement dated December 14,
2009 of Unilife Cross Farm LLC
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
10
|
.26
|
|
January 6, 2010
|
|
10
|
.27
|
|
Form of Share Purchase Agreement between Unilife Medical
Solutions Limited and each of the US investors in the October
and November 2009 private placement
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
10
|
.27
|
|
January 6, 2010
|
|
10
|
.28
|
|
Form of Subscription Agreement between Unilife Medical Solutions
Limited and each of the Australian investors in the October and
November 2009 private placement
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
10
|
.28
|
|
January 6, 2010
|
|
10
|
.29
|
|
2009 Share Purchase Plan Terms and Conditions
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
10
|
.29
|
|
January 6, 2010
|
|
10
|
.30
|
|
Offer Letter dated November 12, 2008 from Unilife Medical
Solutions Limited to Daniel Calvert
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
10
|
.30
|
|
February 1, 2010
|
|
10
|
.31
|
|
Offer Letter dated November 20, 2008 from the Coelyn Group,
on behalf of Unilife Medical Solutions Limited to Bernhard Opitz
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
10
|
.31
|
|
February 1, 2010
|
|
10
|
.32
|
|
Consulting Agreement between Unilife Medical Solutions Limited
and Medical Middle East Limited
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
10
|
.32
|
|
February 1, 2010
|
|
10
|
.33
|
|
Option Deed, dated January 21, 2010 between Unilife Medical
Solutions Limited and Edward Fine
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
10
|
.33
|
|
February 1, 2010
|
86
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
|
Included
|
|
Incorporated by Reference Herein
|
No.
|
|
Description of Exhibit
|
|
Herewith
|
|
Form
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
Filing Date
|
|
|
10
|
.34
|
|
Deed of Settlement and Release dated October 26, 2008 among
Unilife Medical Solutions Limited and Craig Thorley, Joseph
Kaal, Alan Shortall and Roger Williamson and notification
related thereto dated October 27, 2009
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
10
|
.34
|
|
February 10, 2010
|
|
10
|
.35
|
|
Deed of Confirmation of Intellectual Property Rights and
Confidentiality among Unilife Medical Solutions Limited,
Unitract Syringe Pty Limited, Craig Thorley and Joseph Kaal
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
10
|
.35
|
|
February 10, 2010
|
|
10
|
.36
|
|
Form of Restricted Stock Agreement under the Unilife Corporation
2009 Stock Incentive Plan between Unilife Corporation and Alan
Shortall
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
10
|
.36
|
|
February 1, 2010
|
|
10
|
.37
|
|
Form of Unilife Corporation Nonstatutory Stock Option Agreement
between Unilife Corporation and Alan Shortall
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
10
|
.37
|
|
February 1, 2010
|
|
10
|
.38
|
|
Membership Interest Purchase Agreement, dated December 14,
2009 between Unilife Cross Farm LLC and Cross Farm, LLC.
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
10
|
.38
|
|
February 1, 2010
|
|
10
|
.39
|
|
Letter Agreement dated January 29, 2010 between
sanofi-aventis and Unilife Medical Solutions.
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
10
|
.39
|
|
February 1, 2010
|
|
10
|
.40
|
|
Form of Restricted Stock Agreement Under the Unilife Corporation
2009 Stock Incentive Plan
|
|
|
|
10-Q
|
|
|
10
|
.1
|
|
March 24, 2010
|
|
10
|
.41
|
|
Form of Unilife Corporation Nonstatutory Stock Option Notice
|
|
|
|
10-Q
|
|
|
10
|
.2
|
|
March 24, 2010
|
|
10
|
.42*
|
|
Letter Agreement dated February 25, 2010 between
sanofi-aventis and Unilife Medical Solutions Limited
|
|
|
|
10-Q
|
|
|
10
|
.1
|
|
May 17, 2010
|
|
10
|
.43
|
|
Employment Agreement, dated as of June 8, 2010 between
Unilife Corporation and R Richard Wieland
|
|
|
|
8-K
|
|
|
10
|
.1
|
|
June 14, 2010
|
|
10
|
.44
|
|
Separation Agreement and General Release, dated as of
June 28, 2010 between Unilife Corporation and Daniel Calvert
|
|
|
|
8-K
|
|
|
10
|
.1
|
|
July 2, 2010
|
|
10
|
.45
|
|
Employment Agreement, dated as of July 6, 2010 between
Unilife Corporation and J. Christopher Naftzger
|
|
|
|
10-K
|
|
|
10
|
.45
|
|
September 28, 2010
|
|
10
|
.46
|
|
Employment Agreement, dated as of July 27, 2010 between
Unilife Corporation and Dennis P. Pyers
|
|
|
|
10-K
|
|
|
10
|
.46
|
|
September 28, 2010
|
|
10
|
.47
|
|
Non-revolving Credit Agreement dated August 13, 2010
between Unilife Cross Farm LLC and Univest National Bank and
Trust Co.
|
|
|
|
10-K
|
|
|
10
|
.47
|
|
September 28, 2010
|
|
10
|
.48
|
|
Non-revolving Promissory Note dated August 13, 2010 between
Unilife Cross Farm LLC and Univest National Bank and
Trust Co.
|
|
|
|
10-K
|
|
|
10
|
.48
|
|
September 28, 2010
|
|
10
|
.49
|
|
Surety dated August 13, 2010 between Unilife Corporation
and Univest National Bank and Trust Co.
|
|
|
|
10-K
|
|
|
10
|
.49
|
|
September 28, 2010
|
87
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
|
Included
|
|
Incorporated by Reference Herein
|
No.
|
|
Description of Exhibit
|
|
Herewith
|
|
Form
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
Filing Date
|
|
|
10
|
.50
|
|
Security and Control Agreement Regarding Reserve Account dated
August 13, 2010 between Unilife Corporation and Univest
National Bank and Trust Co.
|
|
|
|
10-K
|
|
|
10
|
.50
|
|
September 28, 2010
|
|
10
|
.51
|
|
Loan Agreement between Metro Bank and Unilife Cross Farm LLC
dated as of October 20, 2010
|
|
|
|
8-K
|
|
|
10
|
.1
|
|
October 26, 2010
|
|
10
|
.52
|
|
Term Note in the principal amount of $14,250,000 dated as of
October 20, 2010
|
|
|
|
8-K
|
|
|
10
|
.2
|
|
October 26, 2010
|
|
10
|
.53
|
|
Term Note in the principal amount of $3,750,000 dated as of
October 20, 2010
|
|
|
|
8-K
|
|
|
10
|
.3
|
|
October 26, 2010
|
|
10
|
.54
|
|
Guaranty and Suretyship Agreement dated October 20, 2010
(Unilife Corporation)
|
|
|
|
8-K
|
|
|
10
|
.4
|
|
October 26, 2010
|
|
10
|
.55
|
|
Guaranty and Suretyship Agreement dated October 20, 2010
(Unilife Medical Solutions, Inc.)
|
|
|
|
8-K
|
|
|
10
|
.5
|
|
October 26, 2010
|
|
10
|
.56
|
|
Form of Subscription Agreement between Unilife Corporation and
each investor in the December 2010 Regulation S placement
|
|
|
|
8-K
|
|
|
10
|
.1
|
|
December 2, 2010
|
|
10
|
.57
|
|
Form of Option Agreement between Unilife Corporation and each
investor in the December 2010 Regulation S placement
|
|
|
|
8-K
|
|
|
10
|
.2
|
|
December 2, 2010
|
|
10
|
.58
|
|
Form of Warrant issued to Keystone Redevelopment Group, LLC and
L2 Architecture on December 2, 2010
|
|
|
|
POS AM
|
|
|
10
|
.58
|
|
December 10, 2010
|
|
10
|
.59
|
|
Form of Subscription Agreement (the Company entered into
separate Subscription Agreements with the investors in
substantially the same form set forth in Exhibit 10.1)
|
|
|
|
8-K
|
|
|
10
|
.1
|
|
December 2, 2010
|
|
10
|
.60
|
|
Form of Option Agreement (the Company entered into separate
Option Agreements with the investors in substantially the same
form set forth in Exhibit 10.2)
|
|
|
|
8-K
|
|
|
10
|
.2
|
|
December 2, 2010
|
|
10
|
.61
|
|
2010 Unilife Share Purchase Plan Terms and Conditions
|
|
|
|
8-K
|
|
|
10
|
.1
|
|
January 6, 2011
|
|
10
|
.62
|
|
Separation Agreement and General Release between Unilife
Corporation and Bernhard Opitz
|
|
|
|
10-Q
|
|
|
10
|
.5
|
|
February 14, 2011
|
|
10
|
.63
|
|
Employment Agreement dated February 7, 2011 between Unilife
Corporation and Ramin Mojdehbakhsh, Ph.D.
|
|
|
|
8-K
|
|
|
10
|
.1
|
|
February 7, 2011
|
|
12
|
.1
|
|
Statement regarding computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed
Charges
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
List of subsidiaries of Unilife Corporation
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23
|
.1
|
|
Consent of KPMG LLP
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23
|
.2
|
|
Consent of BDO Audit (WA) Pty Ltd
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31
|
.1
|
|
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a)
Certification of Chief Executive Officer
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31
|
.2
|
|
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a)
Certification of Chief Financial Officer
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
88
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
|
Included
|
|
Incorporated by Reference Herein
|
No.
|
|
Description of Exhibit
|
|
Herewith
|
|
Form
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
Filing Date
|
|
|
32
|
.1
|
|
Section 1350 Certification
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32
|
.2
|
|
Section 1350 Certification
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Confidential treatment has been requested for certain provisions
of this Exhibit pursuant to
Rule 24b-2
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. |
89
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned,
thereunto duly authorized.
UNILIFE CORPORATION
Name: Alan Shortall
|
|
|
|
Title:
|
Chief Executive Officer
|
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons
on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the
dates indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name
|
|
Title
|
|
Date
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Alan
Shortall
Alan
Shortall
|
|
Director and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive
Officer)
|
|
September 13, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ R.
Richard Wieland II
R.
Richard Wieland
|
|
Chief Financial Officer and Executive Vice President
(Principal Financial Officer)
|
|
September 13, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Dennis
P. Pyers
Dennis
P. Pyers
|
|
Vice President, Controller and Chief Accounting Officer
(Principal Accounting Officer)
|
|
September 13, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ John
Lund
John
Lund
|
|
Director
|
|
September 13, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ William
Galle
William
Galle
|
|
Director
|
|
September 13, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Jeff
Carter
Jeff
Carter
|
|
Director
|
|
September 13, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Slavko
James Joseph Bosnjak
Slavko
James Joseph Bosnjak
|
|
Chairman and Director
|
|
September 13, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Mary
Katherine Wold
Mary
Katherine Wold
|
|
Director
|
|
September 13, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Marc
S. Firestone
Marc
S. Firestone
|
|
Director
|
|
September 13, 2011
|
90