UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

Form 10-K/A

(Mark One)

þ		ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

o		TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Commission file number: 000-19001

VAPOR CORP.

(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)

Nevada		84-1070932
(State or other jurisdiction		(I.R.S. Employer Identification
of incorporation or organization)		No.)
3001 Griffin Road
Dania Beach, FL		33312
(Address of principal executive offices)		(Zip Code)

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: None

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.

Yes o No þ

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.

Yes o No þ

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Yes þ No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§229.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).

Yes o No o

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (section 229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of the registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. þ

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer o		Accelerated filer o		Non-accelerated filer o		Smaller Reporting Company þ
				(Do not check if smaller reporting company)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act).

Yes o No þ

The aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant, as of March 31, 2011, was approximately $20,098,122 based upon the closing price reported for such date on the Over the Counter Bulletin Board market. For purposes of this disclosure, shares of common stock held by persons who hold more than 5% of the outstanding shares of common stock and shares held by executive officers and directors of the registrant have been excluded because such persons may be deemed to be affiliates. This determination of executive officer or affiliate status is not necessarily a conclusive determination for other purposes.

60,135,344 shares of Common Stock Issued and Outstanding as of March 30, 2011

 

 

EXPLANATORY NOTE

Vapor Corp. (the “Company”) is amending its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 (the “Original Filing”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) on March 30, 2011, to restate its audited consolidated financial statements as of December 31, 2010 and 2009 and for the years then ended to reflect the effects of accounting and reporting errors, to include stock based compensation expense for employee and non-employee stock options issued on October 1, 2009 and January 1, 2010, and to correct the weighted average number of common shares outstanding. These accounting and reporting errors and the related adjustments resulted in an understatement of net loss and additional paid in capital of $901,536 and $1,190,661, respectively, and an overstatement of retained earnings of $1,190,661 for the year ended December 31, 2010. These accounting and reporting errors and the related adjustments resulted in an understatement of net loss and additional paid in capital of $289,125 and $289,125, respectively, and an overstatement of retained earnings of $289,125 for the year ended December 31, 2009.

In addition, the Company has concluded that these accounting and reporting errors constitute a material weakness in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2010 and that its disclosure controls and procedures were ineffective at December 31, 2010 (see Item 9A(T) of Part II, “Controls and Procedures (Restated)” and “Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting (Restated)”.

Except as required to reflect the effects of the restatement for the items above and the correction of various typographical errors, no additional modifications or updates in this Amendment No. 1 have been made to the Original Filing. Information not affected by the restatement remains unchanged and reflects the disclosures made at the time of the Original Filing. This Amendment No. 1 does not describe other events occurring after the Original Filing, including exhibits, or modify or update those disclosures affected by subsequent events. This Amendment No. 1 should be read in conjunction with the Company’s filings made with the SEC subsequent to the filing of the Original Filing, as those filings may have been amended, as information in such reports and documents may update or supersede certain information contained in this Amendment No. 1. Accordingly, this Amendment No. 1 only amends and restates the Risk Factor entitled “We Depend On The Efforts Of our Management. Our Management Team Lacks Experience In Managing A Public Company and the Obligations Incident to Being a Public Company Will Place Significant Demands on Our Management. We Have Existing Material Weaknesses In Our Internal Control Over Financial Reporting and Are Trying to Remediate these Material Weaknesses” contained in Item 1A of Part I, Items 7 and 9A(T) of Part II, Item 11 of Part III and Item 15 of Part IV of the Original Filing, in each case, solely as a result of, and to reflect, the restatement, and no other information in the Original Filing is amended hereby. Additionally, pursuant to the rules of the SEC, Item 15 of Part IV of the Original Filing has been amended to contain currently dated certifications pursuant Sections 302 and 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, which are attached to this Amendment No. 1 as Exhibits 31.1, 31.2 and 32.1 and an updated signature page. As noted above, this Amendment No. 1 corrects various typographical errors contained in the Original Filing.

VAPOR, CORP.
TABLE OF CONTENTS

PART I			2
Item 1. Business			2
Item 1A. Risk Factors (Restated)			8
Item 2. Properties			23
Item 3. Legal Proceedings			23
PART II			24
Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities			24
Item 7. Management’s Discussion And Analysis of Financial Condition And Results of Operations (Restated)			25
Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure			30
Item 9A. Controls and Procedures (Restated)			30
Item 9B. Other Information			32
PART III			33
Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance			33
Item 11. Executive Compensation (Restated)			34
Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters (Restated)			35
Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence			36
Item 14. Principal Accounting Fees and Services			36
PART IV			36
Item 15. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules (Restated)			36
EXHIBIT INDEX			51
SIGNATURES (RESTATED)			52
Exhibit 21.1
Exhibit 31.1(Restated)
Exhibit 31.2(Restated)
Exhibit 32.1(Restated)

The Business section and other parts of this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A (“Form 10-K/A”) contain forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. Many of the forward-looking statements are located in “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.” Forward-looking statements provide current expectations of future events based on certain assumptions and include any statement that does not directly relate to any historical or current fact. Forward-looking statements can also be identified by words such as “anticipates,” “believes,” “estimates,” “expects,” “intends,” “plans,” “predicts,” and similar terms. Forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and the Company’s actual results may differ significantly from the results discussed in the forward-looking statements. Factors that might cause such differences include, but are not limited to, those discussed in the subsection entitled “Risk Factors” under Part I, Item 1A of this Form 10-K/A, which are incorporated herein by reference. The Company assumes no obligation to revise or update any forward-looking statements for any reason, except as required by law.

PART I

Item 1. Business

Company Background

Vapor Corp. and its wholly owned subsidiaries (collectively “Vapor” or the “Company”) design, market, and distribute electronic cigarettes, under the Fifty-One^®, Krave^®, EZ Smoker^®, Smoke Star^® and Green Puffer^® brands. “Electronic cigarettes” or “e-cigarettes,” are battery-powered products that enable users to inhale nicotine vapor without smoke, tar, ash, or carbon monoxide. Designed to look like a traditional cigarette, each e-cigarette consists of three parts: the nicotine cartridge, the atomizer or heating element, and the battery and electronics.

The Company sells its products through its online stores, its direct response television marketing efforts, to retail channels through its direct sales force, and through third-party wholesalers, retailers, and value-added resellers. The Company’s fiscal year is the 52 or 53-week period that ends on the last day of December. Unless otherwise stated, all information presented in this Form 10-K is based on the Company’s fiscal calendar. The Company was originally incorporated as Miller Diversified Corp in 1987 as a Nevada corporation, and operated in the commercial cattle feeding business until October 31, 2003 when the company sold substantially all of its assets and became a discontinued operation. On September 1, 2009, the Company acquired Smoke Anywhere USA, Inc. in a reverse triangular merger; and as a result of the merger Smoke Anywhere became our sole operating business. On January 7, 2010 the Company changed its name to Vapor Corp. Our corporate website is located at www.vapor-corp.com.

The Electronic Cigarette

Electronic cigarettes are electronic devices, the functional elements include: 1) a small plastic cartridge that contains a liquid nicotine solution,2) the atomizer, which is a heating element that vaporizes the liquid nicotine so that it can be inhaled, and; 3) the electronics, which include: a rechargeable lithium-ion battery and an LED which illuminates to indicate use.

When a user draws air through the device, the air flow is detected by a sensor, which activates a heating element that vaporizes the solution stored in the mouthpiece/cartridge, the solution is then vaporized and it is this vapor that is inhaled by the user. The solution depending on the model may or may not contain nicotine and may or not be flavored. We sell our products in a kit, or as separate components. We also offer for sale replacement cartridges to be used with our non-disposable electronic cigarettes when the cartridges become depleted.

We sell a variety of electronic cigarettes; rechargeable and disposable. E-cigarettes are available in two varieties, a two-piece unit which we market under our DUO^® product line and our three-piece unit, which we market under our TRIO^® product line.

The DUO^®

The DUO’s 2-part construction (battery component and cartridge) features a disposable all-in-one atomized cartridge (also known as a “cartomizer”). This cartomizer is replaced when the nicotine solution is depleted from use. The all-in-one configuration eliminates the need for maintenance of a separate atomizer.

The TRIO^®

The TRIO’s 3-part construction (battery component, atomizer, and cartridge)features a separate atomizer from the cartridge;the atomizer is reused and requires separate maintenance over its useful life. Replacement atomizers are available for sale and are easily serviceable by the user. In the TRIO, the only thing that needs to be replaced is the nicotine cartridge.

Cartridges and Accessories

We also market, refill cartridges in an assortment of flavors and nicotine levels, including a no nicotine cartridge. In addition to other accessories including but not limited to USB, home and car charging devices; carrying cases, replacement parts and other accessories.

Our products are relatively new to market, as is the industry in which we operate. Regulations are emerging that will shape the manner and form in which we operate our business and develop our business plans and strategies going forward. We expect our products will be regulated by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), state and municipal government, and foreign governmental agencies for those respective countries in which we sell our products. Complying with said regulations will be a critical element of our business operations and success.

The Market for Our Products

We market our e-cigarettes as an alternative to traditional tobacco cigarettes. Electronic cigarettes offer a “smoking” experience without the burning of tobacco leaf and as a result, electronic cigarettes offer its users the ability to satisfy their nicotine cravings without smoke, tar, ash or carbon monoxide, and in many cases electronic cigarettes may be used where tobacco burning cigarettes may not.

According to the American Heart Association, there are approximately 45 million smokers in the United States and the World health Organization reports that globally, approximately 15 billion cigarettes are smoked on a daily basis. In 2009, based on industry estimates, electronic cigarette sales were estimated at $100 million, with more than half a million consumers in the U.S. alone (according to the Electronic Cigarette Association, a Washington D.C. based industry trade group, formed in May, 2009,) which equates to approximately 0.1% of the $86.8 billion of cigarette and cigar sold in the U.S in 2006 according to the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.

Our products, in addition to being sold online and through our direct response television marketing campaigns, are currently sold in convenience stores, tobacco shops and at kiosk locations in shopping malls throughout the country. We believe that electronic cigarettes offer smokers a superior experience to tobacco burning cigarettes and are far more convenient when they can be used where traditional cigarettes cannot.

Electronic cigarettes, since their introduction to the US market have largely been sold online, while tobacco products, most notably cigarettes are currently sold in approximately 150,000 retail locations. We believe that future growth of electronic cigarettes is dependent on higher volume, lower margin sales channels, like the broad based distribution network through which cigarettes are sold, and as such, We are focusing on growing our retail distribution reach by entering into distribution agreements with large and established value added resellers and by focusing our sales efforts on regional and national retail chains. We believe that these higher volume lower margin opportunities are critical towards broadening the reach and appeal of e-cigarettes and as electronic cigarettes become more widely known and available,the market for our products will grow.

Distribution and Sales

The distribution and sales strategy for our products is tailored to the characteristics of each market, whether it is geographical or demographical.

Our sales and distribution channels are:

	•		Internet affiliate marketing through independent sales persons.
	•		Direct Sales and Distribution, where we have set up our own distribution directly to retailers.
	•		Single independent distributors who are responsible for distribution within a single market.
	•		Exclusive Territory and Exclusive Channel Distribution, where distributors have an exclusive territory within a country or an exclusive right to sell within a distribution channel (e.g. gas station.)
	•		Distribution through wholesalers, where we supply either national or regional wholesalers who then service retailers.
	•		Internet/E-commerce Sales, where we sell directly to end users through one of our internet websites and or landing pages.
	•		Internet/E-commerce Sales, where we sell directly to end users through one of our internet websites and or landing pages.
	•		Direct response television marketing.

Our distribution and sales channels are supported by internal sales and customer service personnel.

We generate sales and leads through domestic and international trade-shows, telesales, Internet marketing, Internet affiliates and direct response television marketing. We depend on a network of internal and external sales representatives to maintain and grow our business and the revenues we generate.

Competition

We compete with other sellers of electronic cigarettes; the nature of our competitors is varied as the market is highly fragmented and the barriers to entry into the business are low. Our direct competitors sell products that are substantially similar to ours and through the same channels through which we sell our electronic cigarette products. We compete with these direct competitors for sales through distributors, wholesalers and retailers, including but not limited to national chain stores, tobacco shops, gas stations, travel stores, shopping mall kiosks, in addition to direct to public sales through the Internet, mail order and telesales.

As a general matter, we have access to and market and sell the similar electronic cigarettes as our competitors and since we sell our products at substantially similar prices as our competitors; accordingly, the key competitive factors for our success is the quality of service we offer our customers, the scope and effectiveness of our marketing efforts, including media advertising campaigns and, increasingly, the ability to identify and develop new sources of customers.

Part of our business strategy focuses on the establishment of contractual relationships with distributors. We are aware that e-cigarette competitors in the industry are also seeking to enter into such contractual relationships. In many cases, competitors for such contracts may have greater management, human, and financial resources than we do for entering into such contracts and for attracting distributor relationships.

Certain of our electronic cigarette competitors may have better control of their supply and distribution, be, better established, larger and better financed than our Company, however we believe that as a public company we will have better access to capital, management and resources needed to build our business and pursue any regulatory approvals that may be needed in connection with future sales of our products, as the law demands it.

We also compete with the world’s largest tobacco companies “Big Tobacco” as our products deliver nicotine like traditional cigarette and tobacco products. Big Tobacco has nearly limitless resources, global distribution networks in place and a customer base that is fiercely loyal to their brands. Additionally, if tobacco companies seek to compete against us in offering alternative products to traditional cigarettes, namely e-cigarettes or similar alternatives, (i.e.R.J. Reynolds have filed a patent application for an e-cigarette-like device which they refer to as a “Tobacco-Containing Smoking Article”) our ability to differentiate ourselves based on the uniqueness of our product offering will be gone and competing against them will be an even greater challenge.

Moreover, based on consumer use and demand we may find ourselves competing with not only the world’s largest tobacco companies but the world’s largest pharmaceutical companies as well, “Big pharma.” Both big pharma and big tobacco have limitless resources with which to compete against us and both have far greater resources than us and we would be hard pressed to compete successfully against either industry’s participants.

Source and Availability of Raw Materials

We believe that an adequate supply of product and raw materials will be available to us as needed and from multiple sources and suppliers.

Trademarks

We have been awarded trademarks on certain of our brands, including: Krave^®, EZsmoker^®, Smoke Star^®, Fifty-One^® and Green Puffer^®. We have and continue to market, develop and invest in each of these brands.

Government Regulation

On January 24, 2011, The United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit denied a petition for an en banc review of the Court’s December 7, 2010 opinion which affirmed the United States District Court for the District of Columbia’s January 14, 2010 opinion and ordered that”...the FDA cannot regulate customarily marketed tobacco products under the FDCA’s [Food Drug and Cosmetic Act] drug/device provisions, that it can regulate tobacco products marketed for therapeutic purposes under those provisions, and that it can regulate customarily marketed tobacco products under the Tobacco Act” [Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act — FSPTCA] and that “...Regarding harm to third parties and to the public interest, the district court observed that the FDA had cited no evidence to show that electronic cigarettes harmed anyone.” To this end, the Court further ordered that the FDA’s motion to reinstate stay of preliminary injunction be dismissed as moot setting aside import alert 66-41, which the FDA issued, in early 2009, which sought to restrict imports of electronic cigarettes into the United States.

The Tobacco Act, in its construction does not speak directly to electronic cigarettes and as such, we have contacted the FDA for guidance on how to comply with the FSPTCA. To date the FDA has not provided us guidance nor have they published any materials, which would suggest how to comply with the Tobacco Act. We anticipate that regulations and guidance will be forthcoming and we intend, within the best of our abilities, to operate in accordance with FDA regulations.

Presently, several municipal and state governments are contemplating, enacting and or have enacted legislation which recognizes electronic cigarettes as tobacco products and imposes on their sales and use, similar and or the same restrictions that are presently applied to traditional tobacco cigarettes; which include a prohibition on sales to minors and restrictions as to where electronic cigarettes may be used.

There are several pieces of legislation that currently regulate cigarettes and other tobacco products, namely, The Prevent All Cigarette Trafficking Act (the PACT Act,) Jenkins ACT and the Federal Cigarette Labeling and Advertising Act. Currently, none of these acts specifically apply to electronic cigarettes, however should these acts be amended to include electronic cigarettes we would be subjected to regulations that would significantly affect our current business operations and likely result in significant costs to the company in its efforts to comply with each of these Acts.

Employees

We employ 21 full-time and 3 part-time employees. Our employees are not unionized and we believe we have good relations with our employees.

Available Information

The Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K/A Amendment 1, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q and 10-Q/A, Current Reports on Form 8-K, and amendments to reports filed pursuant to Sections 13(a) and 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (“Exchange Act”), are filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”). Such reports and other information filed by the Company with the SEC are available free of charge on the Company’s website at www.vapor-corp.com when such reports are available on the SEC website. The public may read and copy any materials filed by the Company with the SEC at the SEC’s Public Reference Room at 100 F Street, NE, Room 1580, Washington, DC 20549. The public may obtain information on the operation of the Public Reference Room by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. The SEC maintains an Internet site that contains reports, proxy and information statements and other information regarding issuers that file electronically with the SEC at www.sec.gov. The contents of these websites are not incorporated into this filing. Further, the Company’s references to the URLs for these websites are intended to be inactive textual references only.

Item 1A. Risk Factors

Risks Related to Our Business

We Market a Single Class of Products, Which may be Subject to Certain Government Regulations, Whose Approval We may or may not be Able to Achieve.

Electronic cigarettes, which are our sole product offering, are new to the marketplace and may be subject to regulation as a tobacco product and possibly as a drug and drug device if marketed using therapeutic claims. Most E-cigarettes are sold as a means of delivering nicotine to the body. The Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”) is the regulatory agency which oversees tobacco products; however at present it is unclear what, if any regulatory process is required to import, market, manufacture and or distribute-cigarettes. To date the FDA has not established a definitive policy regulating electronic cigarettes.

We intend to use reasonable efforts to file for the appropriate approvals to allow us to sell our product in the United States, however we have no indication that at present we will be able to afford to pursue regulatory approval and that if we are able to pursue said approval we have no assurances that the outcome of said approval process will result in our products being approved by the FDA. Moreover, if the FDA establishes a regulatory process that we are unable or unwilling to comply with our business, results of operations, financial condition and prospects would be adversely affected. (See section “Government Regulation.”)

We Depend On The Efforts Of our Management. Our Management Team Lacks Experience In Managing A Public Company and the Obligations Incident to Being a Public Company Will Place Significant Demands on Our Management. We Have Existing Material Weaknesses In Our Internal Control Over Financial Reporting and Are Trying to Remediate these Material Weaknesses. (Restated)

Our officers lack experience in running a public company. Our success is substantially dependent on the performance of our executive officers. In particular, our success depends substantially on the continued efforts of our executive officers and our Board of Directors.

As a public reporting company, we are required to comply with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and the related rules and regulations of the SEC, including periodic reports, disclosures and more complex accounting rules. As directed by Section 404 of Sarbanes-Oxley, the SEC adopted rules requiring public companies to include a report of management on a company’s internal control over financial reporting in their Annual Report on Form 10-K. Based on current rules, we are required to report under Section 404(a) of Sarbanes-Oxley regarding the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting. As described in Item 9A(T) of this report, we have material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting and disclosure controls and our management has concluded that we did not maintain effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2010. As further described in Item 9A(T) of this report, we have taken steps to remediate the material weaknesses. However, there is no assurance that our remediation efforts will be successful on a timely basis or at all. If these material weaknesses persist, it may be necessary to make further restatements of our consolidated financial statements and investors will not be able to rely on the completeness and accuracy of the financial information contained in our filings with the SEC and this could potentially subject us to sanctions or investigations by the SEC or other regulatory authorities or stockholder litigation.

Currently, we do not have key person life insurance on Mr. Frija our sole executive officer and board member and may be unable to obtain such insurance in the near future due to high cost or other reasons. The loss of the services of Mr. Frija or any of our key employees could have a material adverse effect on our business, if we are unable to find suitable replacements.

The Former Shareholder of Smoke Anywhere USA Are Controlling Stockholders, Our Stockholders May Be Unable To Affect Corporate Activity Without The Support Of These Individuals.

The former shareholders of Smoke Anywhere USA, Inc. as a result of our reverse merger collectively own a majority of our outstanding common stock and, therefore, are able to control all matters requiring approval of our stockholders. Accordingly, our other stockholders may not be able to effect corporate action after this offering without the supporting vote of one or more of these individuals.

Our Limited Operating History Makes it Difficult to Evaluate Our Future Performance.

Our limited operating history makes it difficult to evaluate our current business and our prospects. The likelihood of our future success must be viewed in light of the problems, expenses, difficulties, delays and complications often encountered in the operation of a new business and new industry and product category, where failures of new companies and products are common. We are subject to the risks inherent in the ownership and operation of a development stage company, including regulatory setbacks and delays, fluctuations in expenses, competition and government regulation. If we fail to address these risks and uncertainties our business, results of operations, financial condition and prospects would be adversely affected.

We Cannot Predict Our Future Capital Needs And We May Not Be Able To Secure Additional Financing.

We believe that the cash we have on hand, together with anticipated revenues from operations will be sufficient to meet our presently anticipated working capital and capital expenditure requirements for existing operations for at least the next twelve months, however our belief is based on our operating plan which in turn is based on assumptions, which may prove to be incorrect. As a result, our financial resources may not be sufficient to satisfy our capital requirements for this period.

However, we may require additional working capital to support our operations during any regulatory period, as established by the FDA under the Tobacco Act, wherein we may be precluded from marketing and or selling electronic cigarettes. We expect to raise any required additional funds through public or private equity offerings, debt financings, corporate collaborations, governmental research grants may in some cases be available to us. We may also seek to raise additional capital to fund additional product development efforts, even if we have sufficient funds for our planned operations.

There can be no assurance that any such required additional funding will be available to us at all or available on terms acceptable to us. Further, we currently have no credit facility or similar financing currently available. And any debt financing, if available, may involve restrictive covenants, which may limit our operating flexibility with respect to certain business matters. If additional funds are raised through the issuance of equity securities, the percentage ownership of our existing stockholders will be reduced and our stockholders will experience additional dilution in net tangible book value per share. If adequate funds are not available on acceptable terms, we may be unable to successfully market our products, take advantage of future opportunities, repay debt obligations as they become due or respond to competitive pressures, any and all of which would have an adverse effect on our business.

Our Product Faces Intense Media Attention and Public Pressure

Our product is new to the marketplace and since its introduction certain members of the media, politicians, government regulators and advocate groups, including independent doctors have called for an outright ban of all electronic cigarettes, pending regulatory review and a demonstration of safety. A ban of this type would likely have the effect of terminating our United States’ sales and marketing efforts, of certain products, which we may currently market or have, plans to market in the future. Such a ban would also likely cause public confusion as to which products are the subject of the ban and which are not and would have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and performance.

Our Products Contain Nicotine Which is Considered to be a Highly Addictive Substance.

Certain of our electronic cigarette and electronic cigarette cartridges contain nicotine, a chemical found in cigarettes and other tobacco products which is considered to be highly addictive. The Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act, empowers the FDA to regulate the amount of nicotine found in tobacco products, but may not require the reduction of nicotine yields of a tobacco product to zero. Any FDA regulation may require us to reformulate, recall and or discontinue certain of the products we may sell from time to time, which may have a material adverse effect on our ability to market our products and have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, cash flows and/or future prospects.

The Market For Electronic Cigarettes Is Uncertain And Is Still Evolving.

Electronic cigarettes having recently been introduced to market, are at an early stage of development and are evolving rapidly and are characterized by an increasing number of market entrants. Our future revenues and any future profits are substantially dependent upon the widespread acceptance and use of e-cigarettes. Rapid growth in the use of, and interest in, e-cigarettes is a recent phenomenon, and may not continue on a lasting basis. The demand and market acceptance for these products is subject to a high level of uncertainty.

Our Products may not Serve their Intended Purpose.

An independent study of certain brands of electronic cigarettes, not including our brands, found that the electronic cigarettes tested, delivered little to no measurable nicotine. We are not aware of the methods or protocols of this study used to test the electronic cigarettes and have not independently verified the study’s results. Nor have we conducted our own empirical studies to determine the delivered nicotine in the vapor drawn from our products. We also do not know if the electronic cigarettes tested were manufactured in the same factories in which are products are manufactured. If our products are found to not serve their intended purpose, including delivering nicotine to their users, we may face a decline in sales of our products, an upsurge of requests for refunds, private civil actions and or state or federal unfair business practices actions; any of which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, cash flows and/or future prospects.

Our Business may be Affected if we are Taxed Like Other Tobacco Products or if we are Required to Collect and Remit Sales Tax on Certain of our Internet Sales

Presently our products are not taxed like cigarettes or other tobacco products, all of which have faced significant increases in the amount of taxes collected on the sale of their products. Should state and federal governments and or taxing authorities impose taxes similar to those levied against cigarettes and tobacco products on our products, it may have a material adverse effect on the demand for our products. Moreover we may be unable to establish the systems and processes needed to track and submit the taxes we collect through Internet sales, which would limit our ability to market our products through our websites which would have a material adverse effect on our revenues, operation and financial condition.

States such as New York, Hawaii, Rhode Island and North Carolina have begun collecting taxes on Internet sales where companies have used independent contractors in those states to solicit sales from residents of that state. The requirement to collect track and remit taxes based on independent affiliate sales may require us to increase our prices, which may effect demand for our products or conversely reduce our net profit margin; either of which would have a material adverse effect on our revenues, financial condition and operating results.

Downturns In The Economy May Affect the Demand for our Products and our Financial Performance

Electronic cigarettes are new to market and may be regarded by users as a novelty item and expendable as such demand for our products may be extra sensitive to economic conditions. When economic conditions are prosperous, discretionary spending increases; conversely, when economic conditions are unfavorable, discretionary spending declines. Any significant decline in general corporate conditions or the economy that affect consumer spending could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business and consequently, upon an investment in the Common Stock of our Company.

We may Become Dependent on Foreign Sales to Maintain Our Business.

If the FDA or other state or Federal government agencies restrict or prohibit the sale electronic cigarettes in the United States, in part or in whole, our ability to maintain our business will become dependent on our ability to successfully commercialize our product and brands in foreign jurisdictions where our product can be sold. Our inability to establish distribution in foreign jurisdictions, specifically those that allow for the sale of e-cigarettes will deprive us of the operating revenue we require to fund any domestic regulatory approval effort and continue to maintain our business operations.

Foreign Commercialization Will Result in Additional Costs and Expenses.

Commercializing our product in foreign countries will likely require us to expend additional resources which may reduce our profit margins; additional expenses including but not limited to, local language advertising and marketing materials, packaging, translating product documentation, additionally we may be required to retain foreign counsel to ensure compliance with foreign laws, regulations and taxing regimes, in addition to drafting and enforcing contracts with foreign distributors.

If we fail to commercialize our products in foreign jurisdictions we may find ourselves at a competitive disadvantage not only in those foreign jurisdictions but also in each market in which we have a presence. If we are unable to be competitive we risk losing market share, a decrease in operating revenues all of which would have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and our ability to operate our business.

Our Success is Dependent Upon Our Marketing Efforts.

We have limited marketing experience in marketing electronic cigarettes and limited financial, personnel and other resources to undertake extensive marketing activities. If we are unable to generate significant market awareness for our products and our brands our operations may not generate sufficient revenues for us to execute our business plan, generate revenues and achieve profitable operations.

We Rely on the Efforts of Our Outside Independent Sales Force to Generate Sales.

We rely, in part, on the efforts of our independent sales distributors to purchase and distribute our product to wholesalers and or retailers to generate revenues. No single distributor currently accounts for a material percentage of our revenues and we believe that should any of these relationships terminate we would be able to find suitable replacements, however any change in distributors or our ability to timely replace any given distributor would have a material adverse effect on our business, prospects, financial condition and results of operations.

We rely, in part, on the efforts of outside independent salespersons and Internet sales affiliates to generate sales for our company. No single independent salesperson of Internet affiliate currently accounts for a material percentage of our revenues and we believe that should any of these relationships terminate we would be able to find suitable replacements, however any loss of these independent sales persons or our Internet sales affiliates could have a material adverse effect on our business, prospects, financial condition and results of operations.

We May Not Be Able to Adapt to Trends In our Industry.

We may not be able to adapt as the e-cigarette industry and customer demand evolves; whether attributable to regulatory constraints, mismanagement or a lack of financial resources or, our failure to respond in a timely manner; to new technologies, customer preferences, changing market conditions or new developments in our industry. Any of the failures to adapt or inabilities described herein or otherwise would have a material adverse effect on our business, prospects, financial condition and results of operations.

Existing or Pending Patents Could Prevent Us From Operating Our Business In Its Present Form.

Ruyan, a Chinese company, has made certain public claims as to their ownership of a Chinese patent relating to an “Atomizing Electronic Cigarette.” We currently purchase our products from Chinese manufacturers other than Ruyan. Should Ruyan’s patent be valid and enforceable and cover the devices we purchase from our suppliers, we may be forced to pay more for our products or we may be cutoff from our supply. We may also face a potential action by Ruyan, which we may be forced to defend and which we may ultimately lose. Should any of these events occur, they are likely to have a material adverse effect on our ability to operate our business as a going concern.

R. J. Reynolds one of the largest tobacco companies in the world has filed a patent application for a “Tobacco-Containing Smoking Article.” If R.J. Reynolds patent is awarded and our products are found to be infringing on their patent, our business, prospects, financial condition and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected.

Neither Ruyan or R.J. Reynolds has contacted us regarding any possible infringement of their intellectual property rights nor has any party commenced or threatened to commence any legal action against us. If we are required to participate in litigation we may not have the resources to fund the required litigation costs, which may adversely affect our business prospects, financial condition and results of operations.

In the event that either Ruyan or R. J. Reynolds’ patents are enforceable against us, we may be required to obtain a license to the covered intellectual property or substantially modify or redesign our existing product line in order to continue operations. We can offer no assurance that a license would be available on acceptable terms or at all, or that we will be able to revise our business model economically, efficiently or at all.

We Depend On Third Party Suppliers and Manufacturers For Our Electronic Cigarette Products.

We do not own or control our supply chain our suppliers or our suppliers’ suppliers, therefore we are unable to control or ensure our supply of products or the consistency of those products. We depend on third-party suppliers and manufacturers for our electronic cigarettes, which includes, but is not limited to, our electrical components, technology, flavorings and essences. Our customers associate certain characteristics of our products including the weight, feel, draw, flavor, packaging and other unique attributes of our products to the brands we market, distribute and sell. Any interruption in supply and or consistency of our products may harm our relationships and goodwill with customers, and have a materially adverse affect on our cash flow and our operations.

Although we believe that several alternative sources for our products are available, any failure to obtain the components, chemicals constituents and manufacturing services necessary for the production of our products would have a material adverse effect on our business and prevent us from timely execution of our business plan and may result in additional expenditures of time and money in seeking viable new sources of supply and manufacturer alternatives.

Moreover our inability to replicate those certain characteristics of our products, which our customers associate and enjoy, which are unique to our brands, may cause a loss of customer loyalty, patronage and goodwill and which may have a material adverse effect on our business.

We Use Chinese Manufacturers for the Production of Our Products.

Our suppliers and product manufacturers are based in China. Certain Chinese factories and the products they export have recently been the source of safety concerns and recalls, which is generally attributed to lax regulatory, quality control and safety standards. Should Chinese factories continue to draw public criticism for exporting unsafe products, whether those products relate to us or not we may be adversely and materially affected by the stigma associated with Chinese production, which would effect our business operation, our revenues and our financial projections and prospects.

Moreover, products manufactured by our Chinese suppliers that are not considered safe and or those products that do not comply with U.S. safety and health standards may cause significant harm and or death to persons who use the product and subject us to liability and potential legal claims and cause injury to our reputation, goodwill and operating results.

Product Exchanges, Returns, Warranty Claims, Defect and Recalls May Adversely Affect Our Business

Any and all products are subject to customer service claims, malfunctions and defects, which may subject us to requests for product exchanges, returns, warranty claims and recalls. If we are unable to maintain an acceptable degree of quality control of our products we will incur costs of replacing and or recalling our products and servicing our customers. Any product returns, exchanges, and or recalls we may make will have a material adverse effect on our business, our operations and our profitability and will likely result in the loss of customers and goodwill. Moreover products that do not meet our quality control standards and or those products that do not comply with U.S. safety and health standards or that may be defective may reduce the effectiveness, enjoyment and or cause harm to property, person and or death to persons who use the product. Any such instance will likely result in claims against us and potentially subject us to liability and legal claims which may cause injury to our reputation, goodwill and operating results.

We May Be Unable To Promote And Maintain Our Brands.

We believe that establishing and maintaining the brand identities of our products is a critical aspect of attracting and expanding a large client base. Promotion and enhancement of our brands will depend largely on our success in continuing to provide high quality products. If our customers and end users do not perceive our products to be of high quality, or if we introduce new products or enter into new business ventures that are not favorably received by our customers and end users, we will risk diluting our brand identities and decreasing their attractiveness to existing and potential customers.

Moreover, in order to attract and retain customers and to promote and maintain our brand equity in response to competitive pressures, we may have to increase substantially our financial commitment to creating and maintaining a distinct brand loyalty among our customers. If we incur significant expenses in an attempt to promote and maintain our brands, our profitability will likely be impaired.

We Depend on Our Intellectual Property Rights to Distinguish our Brands and Products.

Our current and future business activities, products and brands may infringe upon the proprietary rights of others, and third parties may assert infringement claims against us. Any such claims and resulting litigation could subject us to significant liability for damages and could result in the invalidation of our proprietary rights. Even if not meritorious, such claims could be time-consuming, expensive to defend and could result in the diversion of our management’s time and attention. In addition, this diversion of managerial resources could have a material adverse effect on our business, prospects, financial condition and results of operations.

We Expect that New Products and/or Brands We Develop will Expose Us to Risks That May be Difficult to Identify Until Such Products and/or Brands are Launched.

We are currently developing, and in the future will continue to develop, new products and brands, the risks of which will be difficult to ascertain until these products and or brands are commercially launched. For example, we are developing new formulations, packaging and distribution channels. Any negative events or results that may arise as we develop new products or brands may adversely affect our reputation, business, financial condition and results of operations.

Our Ability to Implement our Strategy of Attracting and Retaining Employees may be Impaired by the Uncertainty in our Business due to the FDA’s public Statements.

Recent FDA statements with respect to electronic cigarette products, the uncertainty of present and future regulations is likely to injure our ability to compete for talented employees and managers, who may be drawn to more established companies and as a result, we may be unable to attract talented employees, managers, consultants and contractors to help us grow our business.

We may Encounter Difficulties in Managing Our Growth, Which Would Adversely Affect Our Results of Operations.

If we are successful in growing our business we will need to significantly expand our operations, which could put significant strain on our management and our operational and financial resources. To manage future growth, we will need to hire, train, and manage additional employees. Concurrent with expanding our operational and marketing capabilities, we will also need to increase our product development activities. We may not be able to support, financially or otherwise, future growth, or hire, train, motivate, and manage the required personnel. Our failure to manage growth effectively could limit our ability to achieve our goals.

Our success in managing our growth will depend in part on the ability of our executive officers to continue to implement and improve our operational, management, information and financial control systems and to expand, train and manage our employee base, and particularly to attract, expand, train, manage and retain a sales force to market our products on acceptable terms. Our inability to manage growth effectively could cause our operating costs to grow at a faster pace than we currently anticipate, and could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.

We Face a Risk of Product Liability Claims and may not be Able to Obtain Adequate Insurance.

Our business exposes us to potential liability risks that may arise from the sale and use of our products. Liability claims may be expensive to defend and result in large judgments against us. We currently carry liability insurance, however there is no assurance that it will continue to be available to us at an affordable price if at all. Our insurance may not reimburse us, or the coverage may not be sufficient to cover claims made against us. We cannot predict any or all of the possible harms or side effects that may result from the use of our current products or any future products and, therefore, the amount of insurance coverage we currently hold may not be adequate to cover all liabilities we might incur. If we are sued for any injury allegedly caused by our products, our liability could exceed our ability to pay the liability. Whether or not we are ultimately successful in any adverse litigation, such litigation could consume substantial amounts of our financial and managerial resources, all of which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, prospects and stock price.

We do not presently carry product recall insurance and there is no assurance that it would be available to us at a reasonable cost or at all. In the event we were required to recall certain products due to defects or safety concerns, the costs associated with recalling those products, might be greater than we can afford and as a result could have a material adverse effect on our abilities to maintain operations.

We Face Substantial And Increasing Competition.

We face intense competition from direct and indirect competitors, including “big pharma,” “big tobacco” and other known and established or yet to be formed electronic cigarette companies, each of whom pose a competitive threat to our current business and future prospects. We expect competition to intensify in the future. Certain of these companies are either currently competing with us or are focusing significant resources on providing products that will compete with our electronic cigarette product offerings in the future.

There can be no assurance that we will be able to compete successfully against any of our competitors, some of whom have far greater resources, capital, experience, market penetration, sales and distribution channels than us. We have no assurances that we will be able to compete with these competitors and that we will be successful in operating our business and ever achieving profitability. Our inability to successfully compete against these or any of our competitors will have a material adverse effect our business, results of operations and financial condition.

We Face Competition from Foreign Importers Who Do Not Comply With Government Regulation

We face competition from foreign sellers of electronic cigarettes who may illegally ship their products in to the United States for direct delivery to customers. These market participants will not have the added cost and expense of complying with U.S. regulations and taxes and as a result will be able to offer their product at a more competitive price than us and potentially capture market share. Moreover, should we be unable to sell certain of our products during any regulatory approval process we have no assurances that we will be able to recapture those customers that we lost to our foreign domiciled competitors during any “blackout” periods, wherein we were not permitted to sell our products. This competitive disadvantage may have a material adverse impact on our ability to compete with competitors, which may result in a loss of revenue and market share and hamper our ability to generate revenue and continue to operate as a going concern.

Internet Security Poses a Risk To Our E-Commerce Sales.

At present we generate a portion of our revenues through the sale of our products through our websites. We manage our websites and e-commerce platform internally and as a result any compromise of our security or misappropriation of proprietary information could have a material adverse effect on our business, prospects, financial condition and results of operations. We rely on encryption and authentication technology licensed from other companies to provide the security and authentication necessary to effect secure Internet transmission of confidential information, such as credit and other proprietary information. Advances in computer capabilities, new discoveries in the field of cryptography or other events or developments may result in a compromise or breach of the technology used by us to protect client transaction data. Anyone who is able to circumvent our security measures could misappropriate proprietary information or cause material interruptions in our operations. We may be required to expend significant capital and other resources to protect against security breaches or to minimize problems caused by security breaches. To the extent that our activities or the activities of others involve the storage and transmission of proprietary information, security breaches could damage our reputation and expose us to a risk of loss or litigation and possible liability. For example the storage and loss of credit card numbers, that may reside on our servers and be used directly by us or by our service suppliers (ex. merchant account processors). Our security measures may not prevent security breaches. Our failure to prevent these security breaches may result in consumer distrust and may result in a loss of sales and resultantly a loss of revenues.

Our Earnings Could be Adversely Affected by Currency Exchange Rates and Currency Devaluations.

The bulk of our revenues are currently generated in U.S. dollars, however our manufacturers and suppliers are located in China. Fluctuations in exchange rates between our respective currencies could result in higher production and supply costs to us which would have an adverse effect on our profit margins and our business operation if we re not willing or able to pass those costs on to our customers or effectively hedge our currency exposure.

Moreover, if we attempt to hedge our risk in the currency markets and are unsuccessful and or if our competitors are more successful arbitraging the currency risk we may find ourselves at a competitive disadvantage to other market participants which would have a material adverse effect on our business operations.

Risks Related to Government Regulation

Restrictions On the Use of Our Products may Reduce the Attractiveness and Demand for Our Electronic Cigarettes.

Our product since it emits no smoke and no smell can be used in places where the use of traditional tobacco burning cigarettes is prohibited. Should city, state or federal regulators, municipalities, local governments and private industry likewise restrict the use of e-cigarettes from use in those same places where cigarettes can not be smoked, our customers may reduce or otherwise cease using our products entirely, which would have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and performance.

Regulation of Tobacco Products by State and Local Government.

State and local governments currently legislate and regulate tobacco products, including what is considered a tobacco product, how tobacco taxes are calculated and collected, to whom tobacco products can be sold and by whom, in addition to where tobacco products, specifically cigarettes may be smoked and where they may not. Certain municipalities have enacted local ordinances which preclude the use of e-cigarettes where traditional tobacco burning cigarettes cannot be used and certain states have proposed legislation that would categorize electronic cigarettes as tobacco products, equivalent to their tobacco burning counterparts. If these bills become laws, electronic cigarettes may lose their appeal as an alternative to cigarettes; which may have the effect of reducing the demand for our products and as a result have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.

State Actions Against Us May have a Material Effect on our Ability to Sell Our Products.

On February 15, 2010, in response to a civil investigative demand from the Office of the Attorney General of the State of Maine, we voluntarily executed a assurance of discontinuance, with the state of Maine, which restricts our ability to sell electronic cigarettes in the state of Maine until such time as we obtain a retail tobacco license in the state. While suspending sales to residents of Maine is not material to our operations, other electronic cigarette companies have entered into similar agreements with other states, such as the state of Oregon. If numerous states and or more populous states or states in which we generate significant revenues bring actions to restrict sales of our products, by us or our re-sale customers, and if we are unable to satisfactorily responded to their concerns and or acquire the necessary licenses, permissions or permits and or if those licenses permissions or permits are overly burdensome or costly to obtain and or if those licenses, permissions or permits are not available to us; we may be required to cease sales and distribution of our products to those states, which would have a material adverse effect on our business operations.

FDA Authority Under the Food Drug and Cosmetics Act; Prohibition Against Therapeutic Claims.

Electronic cigarettes, if marketed or sold in connection with therapeutic claims, (i.e. smoking cessation claims, claims to cure treat or mitigate a disease) would be subject to the FDA’s regulatory authority under the Food Drug and Cosmetics Act. We do not make therapeutic claims in connection with our marketing and or sales of our electronic cigarettes. Any violation of law with respect to the company’s marketing materials, and or labeling could expose the Company to liability including but not limited to fines, sanctions, administrative actions, detention and seizure of product, penalties, civil actions and or criminal prosecution each of which could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, reputation, results of operations and financial condition.

The Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act Grants the FDA Authority to Regulate Tobacco Products and How they are Marketed and Sold.

On June 22, 2009 the Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act (the “Act”) was signed into law. The effect of this legislation on our business is presently unknown and may place limits on our ability to market and or distribute our products and or bring new products to market. The legislation may impose costly and resource intensive processes to gain regulatory approval to market our products and there is no certainty that we will have the capital, resources necessary to comply with the regulation or that we would be ultimately successful in receiving the necessary approvals to continue marketing our product under the provisions of the Act. Specifically the Act grants the FDA the authority to regulate tobacco products including but not limited to how they are marketed, the level of nicotine and the method for introducing new tobacco products to market. The legislation eliminates all flavoring other than menthol for cigarettes, yet under the legislation the FDA is not empowered to ban certain tobacco products or require that the nicotine in tobacco products be reduced to zero. While the legislation does not mention electronic cigarettes, the Act and a U.S. Federal District Appellate court have suggested that the FDA may regulate electronic cigarettes as tobacco products under the Act. Until the FDA establishes the regulatory processes to regulate electronic cigarettes under the Act, we do not know how and to what degree we will be regulated. Moreover, if the FDA establishes a regulatory process that we are unable or unwilling to comply with our business, results of operations, financial condition and prospects would be adversely and materially affected. See section “Government Regulation.”

The FDA has Issued an Import Alert, Which has Limited Our Ability to Import Certain of Our Products

As a result of FDA import alert 66-41 US Customs has from time to time temporarily and in some instances indefinitely detained products sent to us by our Chinese suppliers. If the FDA and or customs modifies the import alert from its current form which allows US customs’ discretion to release our products to us, to a mandatory and definitive hold we will no longer be able to ensure a supply of product for US sales, which will have material adverse effect on our ability to generate revenues, as domestic sales currently account for a significant portion of our revenue.

Actions by the FDA Adverse to Our Company and Our Products may Restrict our Ability to do Business Domestically and Internationally.

When the United States Food and Drug Administration, the largest and most pervasive health regulator in the world sought to categorize and regulate electronic cigarettes as a drug and medical device, it had a chilling effect on health regulators of foreign governments who similarly sought to regulate e-cigarettes in the same manner. Although, the FDA can no longer regulate e-cigarettes as a drug device, absent therapeutic claims, other foreign health regulators have not modified their policies toward e-cigarettes. In the event that other foreign government agencies do not alter their position on electronic cigarettes to conform with US policies, we would be precluded from selling efforts in those respective countries, which would have a material adverse effect on our growth prospects, which would limit our sales and revenue potentials.

Federal Cigarette and Tobacco Laws, if Applied to Electronic Cigarettes Would Materially Affect Our Business

While none of the following cigarette laws currently apply to electronic cigarettes, any such amendment that would require compliance by us with the: The Prevent All Cigarette Trafficking Act (the PACT Act) which prohibits the use of the Postal Service to mail most tobacco products and which amends the Jenkins Act, which would require individuals and businesses that make interstate sales of cigarettes or smokeless tobacco to comply with state tax laws and the Federal Cigarette Labeling and Advertising Act, which governs how cigarettes can be advertised and marketed, would have a material effect on how we operate our business, how we market our products, and derive revenue. Each of these laws, if applied to electronic cigarettes would significantly increase our cost of compliance, our profit margins, the attractiveness to consumers of or products and all of which would have a material adverse effect on our revenues, financial condition and operating results.

Changes in Governmental Regulation May Affect the Countries in Which we Sell Our products

Foreign jurisdiction have varying policies and laws with respect to the use of electronic cigarettes that vaporize nicotine, countries such as the United Kingdom do not restrict its use while other countries such as Thailand have instituted a total ban. If countries such as the United Kingdom reverse their stance or should other countries who have a neutral stance move towards prohibition, it will have a direct impact on our ability to market our products and will have a material adverse effect on our business.

We may Face the Same Governmental Actions Aimed at Cigarettes and Other Tobacco Products.

Tobacco industry expects significant regulatory developments to take place over the next few years, driven principally by the World Health Organization’s Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (“FCTC”). The FCTC is the first international public health treaty on tobacco, and its objective is to establish a global agenda for tobacco regulation with the purpose of reducing initiation of tobacco use and encouraging cessation. Regulatory initiatives that have been proposed, introduced or enacted include:

	•		the levying of substantial and increasing tax and duty charges;
	•		restrictions or bans on advertising, marketing and sponsorship;
	•		the display of larger health warnings, graphic health warnings and other labeling requirements;
	•		restrictions on packaging design, including the use of colors and generic packaging;
	•		restrictions or bans on the display of tobacco product packaging at the point of sale, and restrictions or bans on cigarette vending machines;
	•		requirements regarding testing, disclosure and performance standards for tar, nicotine, carbon monoxide and other smoke constituents levels;
	•		requirements regarding testing, disclosure and use of tobacco product ingredients;
	•		increased restrictions on smoking in public and work places and, in some instances, in private places and outdoors;
	•		elimination of duty free allowances for travelers; and
	•		encouraging litigation against tobacco companies.

Operating income could be significantly affected by any significant decrease in demand for our products, any significant increase in the cost of complying with new regulatory requirements.

Risks Related to Ownership of Our Stock

Our Board of Directors is Authorized to Issue Additional Shares of Our Stock Which Would Dilute Existing Shareholders.

We are currently authorized to authorize up to 250,000,000 shares of common stock, of which 60,135,344 shares are currently issued and outstanding. Additional shares of our common stock may be issued by our board of directors for such consideration as they may consider sufficient without seeking stockholder approval. The issuance of additional shares of common stock in the future will reduce the proportionate ownership and voting power of current stockholders.

Your Percentage Ownership of our Common Shares may be Diluted by Future Share Issuances

To the extent we issue new shares to fund acquisitions, to raise additional capital, to compensate employees and other persons your percentage ownership of our shares will be diluted.

We Do Not Intend To Pay Future Cash Dividends.

We currently do not anticipate paying cash dividends on our common stock at any time in the near future. We may never pay cash dividends or distributions on our common stock. Any credit agreements which we may enter into with institutional lenders may restrict our ability to pay dividends. Whether we pay cash dividends in the future will be at the discretion of our board of directors and will be dependent upon our financial condition, results of operations, capital requirements and any other factors that the board of directors decides is relevant.

Our Common Stock is Illiquid And Should A Market For Our Securities Develop The Price Of Our Securities May Be Volatile.

Our shares are currently listed on the Over the Counter Bulletin Board, the market for our securities is and will likely remain illiquid. This means that as an investor you will likely have a difficult time selling our Common Stock at market. Furthermore because of the small amount of shares that will be outstanding and or in the public float, the market price of our common stock may experience significant volatility. Other factors that may contribute to volatility should a market for our Common Stock develop are, our quarterly results, announcements by us or our competitors regarding acquisitions or dispositions, loss of existing clients, new procedures or technology, litigation, changes in general conditions in the economy and general market conditions could cause the market price of the common stock to fluctuate substantially. In addition, the stock market has experienced significant price and volume fluctuations that have particularly affected the trading prices of equity securities of many technology and Internet companies. Frequently, these price and volume fluctuations have been unrelated to the operating performance of the affected companies.

Future Sales Of Our Common Stock May Depress Our Stock Price.

If our controlling stockholders sell substantial amounts of our common stock in the public market following this merger or at any time in the future, the market price of our common stock could fall.

Existing Shareholders beneficially hold approximately 60,135,344 Shares of which approximately 41,871,088 shares are in the public float and are eligible to be sold free of any restrictions. All other Shares are held by affiliates of the Company. The Company can make no prediction as to the effect, if any, that sale of Shares, or the availability of Shares for future sale, will have on the market price of the Shares prevailing from time to time. Sales of substantial amounts of Shares in the public market, or the perception that such sales could occur, could depress prevailing market prices for the Shares. Such sales may also make it more difficult for the Company to sell equity securities or equity-related securities in the future at a time and price, which it deems appropriate.

Broker-Dealers may be discouraged from effecting transactions in our common stock because they may be considered a “Penny Stock” and are subject to the applicable Penny Stock rules.

Rules 15g-1 through 15g-9 promulgated under the Exchange Act impose sales practice and disclosure requirements on certain brokers-dealers who engage in certain transactions involving a “penny stock.” Subject to certain exceptions, a penny stock generally includes any non-NASDAQ equity security that has a market price of less than $5.00 per share. There is currently no established price quotation for our shares, however, we expect that initial quotations will not exceed $5.00 and there is the possibility that the

quoted shares price may never exceed $5.00, and that our common stock will be deemed penny stock for the purposes of the Exchange Act. The additional sales practice and disclosure requirements imposed upon brokers-dealers may discourage broker-dealers from effecting transactions in our common stock, which could severely limit the market liquidity of the stock and impede the sale of our stock in the secondary market. Specifically, any broker-dealer selling penny stock to anyone other than an established customer or “accredited investor,” generally, an individual with net worth in excess of $1,000,000 or an annual income exceeding $200,000, or $300,000 together with his or her spouse, must make a special suitability determination for the purchaser and must receive the purchaser’s written consent to the transaction prior to sale, unless the broker-dealer or the transaction is otherwise exempt. In addition, the penny stock regulations require the broker-dealer to deliver, prior to any transaction involving a penny stock, a disclosure schedule prepared by the United States Securities and Exchange Commission relating to the penny stock market, unless the broker-dealer or the transaction is otherwise exempt. A broker-dealer is also required to disclose commissions payable to the broker-dealer and the registered representative and current quotations for the securities. Finally, a broker-dealer is required to send monthly statements disclosing recent price information with respect to the penny stock held in a customer’s account and information with respect to the limited market in penny stocks.

Item 2. Properties.

Our principal executive offices are located at 3101 Hallandale Beach Boulevard #100, Pembroke Park, Florida 33009. We are currently leasing approximately 1,750 sq. ft. for $2,756 per month on a month-to-month lease.

We lease additional warehouse space, which is currently owned in part by Mr. Frija, our PEO and PFO and certain of our affiliates, at a price, which we believe is more favorable than we could otherwise, secure. We believe that existing facilities are suitable and adequate for our current needs. If we require additional space, we believe that we will be able to secure such space on commercially reasonable terms without undue operational disruption.

Item 3 Legal Proceedings.

As of December 31, 2010, the end of the annual period covered by this report, the Company was subject to the various legal proceedings and claims discussed below, as well as certain other legal proceedings and claims that have not been fully resolved and that have arisen in the ordinary course of business. In the opinion of management, the Company does not have a potential liability related to any current legal proceedings and claims that would individually or in the aggregate materially adversely affect its financial condition or operating results. However, the results of legal proceedings cannot be predicted with certainty. Should the Company fail to prevail in any of these legal matters or should several of these legal matters be resolved against the Company in the same reporting period, the operating results of a particular reporting period could be materially adversely affected.

Smoke Anywhere USA, Inc. v. TransFirst

On February 23, 2010 Smoke Anywhere USA, Inc., our wholly owned subsidiary, filed an arbitration against TransFirst, a company providing us credit card transaction processing services, as required, in the event of a dispute under the services contract by and between the parties. We are seeking to have certain fees and fines levied on the company reversed, in addition to demanding that certain monies held by TransFirst, be released to the Company.

PART II

Item 5 Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

The Company’s common stock is traded on the Over-the-Counter Bulletin Board market under the symbol VPCO. For purposes of this Item the existence of limited or sporadic quotations should not of itself be deemed to constitute an established public trading market.

Price Range of Common Stock

The price range per share of common stock presented below represents the highest and lowest sales prices for the Company’s common stock on the over-the-counter Bulletin Board market during each quarter of the two most recent years. The quotations listed below reflect sporadic trading activity in the company’s stock and does not represent the existence of an established public trading market for our securities.

		Fourth				Third				Second				First
		Quarter				Quarter				Quarter				Quarter
Fiscal 2009 price range per common share		$	1.275-0.15			$	0.75-.25			$	0.475-0.0375			$	0.075-0.0375
Fiscal 2010 price range per common share		$	0.20-0.60			$	0.15- 0.40			$	0.14-0.49			$	0.14-0.90

Holders

As of March 31, 2011, there were 1,425 shareholders of record.

Dividends

The Company did not declare or pay cash dividends in either 2010 or 2009. The Company anticipates that for the foreseeable future it will retain any earnings for use in the operation of its business.

Purchases of Equity Securities by the Issuer and Affiliated Purchasers

None.

ITEM 7. Management’s Discussion And Analysis Of Financial Condition And Results Of Operation(Restated)

Our Management’s Discussion and Analysis should be read in conjunction with our audited consolidated financial statements and related notes included elsewhere in this report.

Forward-Looking Statements

This current report contains forward-looking statements and information relating to us that are based on the beliefs of our management as well as assumptions made by, and information currently available to, our management. When used in this report, the words “believe,” “anticipate,” “expect,” “estimate,” “intend”, “plan” and similar expressions, as they relate to us or our management, are intended to identify forward-looking statements. These statements reflect management’s current view of us concerning future events and are subject to certain risks, uncertainties and assumptions, including among many others: a general economic downturn; a downturn in the securities markets; federal or state laws or regulations having an adverse effect on proposed transactions that we desire to effect; Securities and Exchange Commission regulations which affect trading in the securities of “penny stocks,”; and other risks and uncertainties. Should any of these risks or uncertainties materialize, or should underlying assumptions prove incorrect, actual results may vary materially from those described in this report as anticipated, estimated or expected. The accompanying information contained herein, including, without limitation, the information set forth under the heading “Risk Factors” identifies important additional factors that could materially adversely affect actual results and performance. You are urged to carefully consider these factors. All forward-looking statements attributable to us are expressly qualified in their entirety by the foregoing cautionary statement. The terms “Vapor Corp.,” “Vapor,” “we,” “us,” “our,” and the “Company” refer to Vapor Corp. and the terms “Smoke Anywhere USA,” and “Smoke” refer to our wholly owned subsidiary Smoke Anywhere USA, Inc.”

Executive Overview

The Company designs, markets, and distribute electronic cigarettes, under the Fifty-One^®, Krave^®, EZ Smoker^®, Smoke Star^® and Green Puffer^® brands. “Electronic cigarettes” or “e-cigarettes,” are battery-powered products that enable users to inhale nicotine vapor without fire, smoke, tar, ash, or carbon monoxide.

The Company participates directly in the highly competitive and fragmented e-cigarette market, but also faces competition from tobacco companies. Electronic cigarettes are relatively new products and the Company is continually working to introduce its product and brands to customers. The Company believes increased investment in marketing and advertising programs is critical to increasing product and brand awareness and that sales of its innovative and differentiated products are enhanced by knowledgeable salespersons who can convey the value and benefits electronic cigarettes have to offer over traditional tobacco burning cigarettes.

The Company’s business strategy leverages its unique ability to design market and develop multiple e-cigarette brands and to bring those brands to market through its multiple distribution channels. The Company sells its products through its online stores, its direct response television marketing efforts, to retail channels through its direct sales force, and through third-party wholesalers, retailers, and value-added resellers.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

This discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations are based upon our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The preparation of these consolidated financial statements requires us to make significant estimates and judgments that affect the amounts reported in the consolidated financial statements and the accompanying notes. These items are regularly monitored and analyzed by management for changes in facts and circumstances, and material changes in these estimates could occur in the future. Changes in estimates are recorded in the period in which they become known. The estimates are based on historical experience and various other assumptions that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results may differ from the estimates.

Revenue Recognition

Net sales consist primarily of revenue from the sale of electronic cigarettes, replacement cartridges, components for electronic cigarettes and related accessories. We recognize revenue from product sales when the persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, delivery has occurred and collect-ability is reasonably assured. Product sales and shipping revenues, net of promotional discounts, rebates, and return allowances, are recorded when the products are shipped and title passes to customers. Retail items sold to customers are made pursuant to sales contracts that generally provide for transfer of both title and risk of loss upon our delivery to the carrier. Return allowances, which reduce product revenue by our best estimate of expected product returns, are estimated using historical experience. Revenue from product sales and services rendered is recorded net of sales taxes.

Stock-Based Compensation

We account for stock-based compensation under ASC Topic 718, “Compensation-Stock Compensation (“ASC Topic 18”). These standards define a fair value based method of accounting for stock-based compensation. In accordance with ASC Topic 718, the cost of stock-based compensation is measured at the grant date based on the value of the award and is recognized over the vesting period. The value of the stock-based award is determined using the Black-Scholes-Merton valuation model, whereby compensation cost is the excess of the fair value of the award as determined by the valuation model at the grant date or other measurement date over the amount that must be paid to acquire the stock. The resulting amount is charged to expense on the straight-line basis over the period in which we expect to receive the benefit, which is generally the vesting period.

Income Taxes

We record valuation allowances against our deferred tax assets. Realization of deferred tax assets (such as net operating loss carry-forwards) is dependent on future taxable earnings and is therefore uncertain. At least quarterly, we assess the likelihood that our deferred tax asset balance will be recovered from future taxable income. To the extent we believe that recovery is not likely, we establish a valuation allowance against our deferred tax asset, which increases our income tax expense in the period when such determination is made.

In addition, we do not plan to record U.S. income tax expense for foreign earnings that we have determined to be indefinitely reinvested offshore, thus reducing our overall income tax expense. The amount of earnings designated as indefinitely reinvested offshore is based upon the actual deployment of such earnings in our offshore assets and our expectations of the future cash needs of our U.S. and foreign entities. Income tax considerations are also a factor in determining the amount of foreign earnings to be indefinitely reinvested offshore.

We carefully review all factors that drive the ultimate disposition of foreign earnings determined to be reinvested offshore, and apply stringent standards to overcoming the presumption of repatriation. Despite this approach, because the determination involves our future plans and expectations of future events, the possibility exists that amounts declared as indefinitely reinvested offshore may ultimately be repatriated. For instance, the actual cash needs of our U.S. entities may exceed our current expectations, or the actual cash needs of our foreign entities may be less than our current expectations. This would result in additional income tax expense in the year we determined that amounts were no longer indefinitely reinvested offshore. Conversely, our approach may also result in a determination that accumulated foreign earnings (for which U.S. income taxes have been provided) will be indefinitely reinvested offshore. In this case, our income tax expense would be reduced in the year of such determination.

On an interim basis, we estimate what our effective tax rate will be for the full fiscal year. The estimated annual effective tax rate is then applied to the year-to-date pre-tax income excluding infrequently occurring or unusual items, to determine the year-to-date tax expense. The income tax effects of infrequent or unusual items are recognized in the interim period in which they occur. As the fiscal year progresses, we continually refine our estimate based upon actual events and earnings by jurisdiction during the year. This continual estimation process periodically results in a change to our expected effective tax rate for the fiscal year. When this occurs, we adjust the income tax provision during the quarter in which the change in estimate occurs so that the year-to-date provision equals the expected annual rate.

We account for uncertain tax positions on a quarterly basis, we reevaluate the probability that a tax position will be effectively sustained and the appropriateness of the amount recognized for uncertain tax positions based on factors including changes in facts or circumstances, changes in tax law, settled audit issues and new audit activity. Changes in our assessment may result in the recognition of a tax benefit or an additional charge to the tax provision in the period our assessment changes. We recognize interest and penalties related to income tax matters in income tax expense.

Other Contingencies

In the ordinary course of business, we are involved in legal proceedings regarding contractual and employment relationships, product liability claims, trademark rights, and a variety of other matters. We record contingent liabilities resulting from claims against us, including related legal costs, when a loss is assessed to be probable and the amount of the loss is reasonably estimable. Assessing probability of loss and estimating probable losses requires analysis of multiple factors, including in some cases judgments about the potential actions of third party claimants and courts. Recorded contingent liabilities are based on the best information available and actual losses in any future period are inherently uncertain. If future adjustments to estimated probable future losses or actual losses exceed our recorded liability for such claims, we would record additional charges as other (income) expense, net during the period in which the actual loss or change in estimate occurred. In addition to contingent liabilities recorded for probable losses, we disclose contingent liabilities when there is a reasonable possibility that the ultimate loss will materially exceed the recorded liability. Currently, we do not believe that any of our pending legal proceedings or claims will have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations.

Results of Operations for the Year ended December 31, 2010 Compared to the Year ended December 31, 2009

During the year ended December 31, 2010, we had $10,917,101 in revenues. This was an increase of $2,959,854 or approximately 37% from the year ended December 31, 2009. Several factors contributed positively to these increases, including the following:

	•		Greater consumer demand for our electronic cigarette products;
	•		An increase in repeat orders from our distributors and wholesale customers;
	•		Residual orders for replacement cartridges from our existing customer base;
	•		Positive returns from an increase in our advertising and sales efforts.

Revenues did not increase proportionate to our cost of sales due to the fact that gross margins shrank as a result of a proportionate increase in lower margin sales to value added re-sellers such as wholesalers and distributors, over direct to consumer sales, through our online store and our direct response television marketing. We believe the growth of our sales channel mix, represents a maturation of electronic cigarettes as a product category and we believe that future growth will come through an expansion of our distribution network, building towards the 150,000 locations that currently sell tobacco products.

Our operating expenses increased by $4,208,684 or 54.6% for the year ended December 31, 2010 to $11,918,325 from $7,709,641 from the year ended December 31, 2009. Our cost of sales increased by $3,018,996 to $6,058,297 for the year ended December 31, 2010. This was an increase of 99%, as compared to cost of sales of $3,039,301 for the year ended December 31, 2009. The increase in our cost of sales is a result of an increase in units purchased for re-sale. The increase is attributable to an increase in the number of units purchased and not the cost of the units purchased, moreover costs per unit decreased year over year due in part to, efficiencies at our suppliers, industry pricing pressures and negotiations based on volume discounts. As discussed above, lower margin sales accounted for a disproportionate increase in revenues relative to the amount of product we sold.

Selling, general and administrative expenses for the year ended December 31, 2010 were $4,958,492 compared to selling general and administrative expenses of $4,381,215 for the year ended December 31, 2009. This increase included $124,214 in professional fees and lobbying costs incurred in our efforts to identify and comply with a yet to be established FDA regulatory framework for electronic cigarette products and a one time payment of $288,000 paid ratably over 12 months to the former shareholders of Smoke Anywhere for services rendered during the transition period, $216,000 of which was paid in the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010.

During the year ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, we recognized stock-based compensation expense of $901,536 and $289,125, respectively. The increase in stock-based compensation expense relates to amortization of stock options granted to our President and Chief Executive Officer to purchase 900,000 shares of our common stock in October 2009 valued at $231,300 and from the granting of options to our employees and consultants to purchase 3,600,000 shares of our common stock in October 2009, valued at $925,200.

During the year ended December 31, 2010, we had $0 in research and development costs. This was unchanged from the period ended December 31, 2009.

We had net loss of ($1,002,224) for the year ended December 31, 2010, as compared to net income of $45,606 for the year ended December 31, 2009. The decrease in net income was primarily due to the $612,411 increase in stock-based compensation expense and the $340,214 we paid in consulting fees, $216,000 of which was a one-time charge against earnings and we expect that the costs associated with our lobbying efforts will decrease and eventually end once the regulatory framework for electronic cigarettes is established.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

During the year ended December 31, 2010, we had total assets of $1,799,132 compared to $1,359,300 of total assets for the year ended December 31, 2009. This was an increase of $439,832 or 32% which is attributable to an increase in inventory, a cash reserve related to product sold and monies held by our credit card payment processor and an increase in accounts receivable as a result of year over year sales growth.

During the year ended December 31, 2010, we had total liabilities of $1,174,593 as compared to total liabilities of $655,823 for the year ended December 31, 2009. This was an increase of $538,364 or 82%. Liabilities for the period include monies due to factories for inventory, advertising and media purchases, insurance, accounting fees, unpaid commissions and unpaid consulting fees.

During the year ended December 31, 2010, we had additional paid in capital of $1,537,776, an accumulated deficit of ($973,372) and total stockholders’ equity of $624,539, as compared to year ended December 31, 2009, we had additional paid in capital of $614,625, retained earnings of $28,852 and total stockholder’s equity of $703,477.

Our net cash provided by operating activities was $64,893 for the year ended December 31, 2010 which included net loss of $1,002,224, stock-based compensation expense of $901,536 and accounts payable and accrued expenses of $547,332. Net cash used in operating activities for the year ended December 31, 2009 was $320,921, which included net income of $45,606, stock-based compensation expense of $289,125, and accounts payable and accrued expenses of $445,896. For the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, the acquisition and purchase of inventories was $97,397 and $816,099, respectively.

We believe that our cash on hand and anticipated cash flow from operations will provide sufficient liquidity and capital resources for our anticipated working capital and capital expenditure requirements for at least the next twelve months. However, we may need to raise capital in the form of equity or debt financing. There are no assurances that we will be able to raise capital, if needed, on terms acceptable to us or at all.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We do not have any off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on our financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources that is material to investors.

Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure.

None.

Item 9A. Controls and Procedures (Restated)

Restatement

As discussed elsewhere in this Amendment No. 1 and in Note 8 to the audited consolidated financial statements contained in Part IV, Item 15 hereof, the Company has amended its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 to restate its audited consolidated financial statements as of December 31, 2010 and 2009 and for the years then ended to reflect the effects of accounting and reporting errors, to include stock based compensation expense for employee and non-employee stock options issued on October 1, 2009, and to correct the weighted average number of common shares outstanding.

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures (Restated)

In our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 (the “Original Filing”), as filed with the SEC on March 30, 2011, our chief executive officer and chief financial officer (principal executive officer and principal financial officer) evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as such term is defined in Rule 13a-15(e) promulgated under the Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”)) as of the end of the period covered by the Original Filing. Based on that evaluation, our management initially concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective in reaching a reasonable level of assurance that information required to be included in our reports filed or submitted under the Exchange Act as of such time was recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time period specified in the SEC’s rules and forms and such information was accumulated and communicated as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures. Disclosure controls and procedures are defined as those controls and other procedures of an issuer that are designed to ensure that the information required to be disclosed by the issuer in the reports it files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the Commission’s rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by an issuer in the reports that it files or submits under the Act is accumulated and communicated to the issuer’s management, including its principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

In connection with the restatement discussed above, our chief executive officer and chief financial officer (principal executive officer and principal financial officer) reevaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of December 31, 2010 pursuant to SEC Rule 13a-15(b) under the Exchange Act. As a result of such reevaluation and the material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting described below, our management has now concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective as of December 31, 2010.

Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting (Restated)

Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act). In the Original Filing, management concluded that we maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2010. However, in connection with the restatement discussed in Note 8 to our audited consolidated financial statements included elsewhere herein, management has subsequently determined that the following material weakness existed as of December 31, 2010. The material weaknesses in our disclosure control procedures are as follows:

	1.		We did not maintain effective controls over its accounting for stock-based compensation expense for employee and non-employee stock options in accordance with ASC Topic 718, “Compensation-Stock Compensation.
	2.		We did not properly calculate the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the year ending December 31, 2010.

As a result of this material weakness, management has concluded that the Company did not maintain effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2010 based on the criteria set forth in Internal Control — Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Accordingly, management has restated its report on internal control over financial reporting.

We have taken steps to remediate the identified material weaknesses and we intend to continue to implement measures to remediate the identified material weaknesses including, but not necessarily limited to, the following:

We are actively seeking to hire additional, qualified finance and accounting staff with significant depth and expertise to supplement existing personnel, including a Chief Financial Officer. During the third quarter of 2011, we retained an independent financial consultant to advise us on the organization and composition of the finance and accounting department. We will establish a formal review process of significant accounting transactions that includes participation of the Chief Executive Officer, the Chief Financial Officer and the Company’s corporate legal counsel.

There is no assurance that our remediation efforts will be successful on a timely basis or at all. If these material weaknesses persist, it may be necessary to make further restatements of our consolidated financial statements and investors will not be able to rely on the completeness and accuracy of the financial information contained in our filings with the SEC and this could potentially subject us to sanctions or investigations by the SEC or other regulatory authorities or stockholder litigation.

Item 9B. Other Information.

None.

PART III

Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance.

Directors

The names of our director(s) and certain information about them, as of December 31, 2010, are set forth below:

Name of Director

Age

Position with Company

Director since

Kevin Frija

39

Director

June 9, 2009

Executive Officers

The names of our executive officer(s) and certain information about them, as of December 31, 2010, are set forth below:

Name of Officer

Age

Position with Company

Officer since

Kevin Frija

39

Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer

November 5, 2009

Kevin Frija

Mr. Kevin Frija is the company’s CEO, CFO and Chairman of the Board of Directors, Mr. Frija is the Company’s sole executive officer and director and has been such, since June 9, 2009. Kevin has over 20 years of experience, particularly in the areas of sourcing, manufacturing, supply chain management, marketing, advertising, and licensing. Prior to Kevin’s involvement in the Company, Kevin operated and Ingear, Inc. a swim and resort wear company based in Miami, Florida. Kevin, currently and on a limited basis assists Ingear in a managerial capacity.

Board Committees

The Board does not have a standing Audit and Finance Committee (the “Audit Committee”), or Compensation Committee and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee (the “Nominating Committee”). Since the Board is comprised solely of our sole executive officer, we do not have any independent board members or an independent board.

Director Compensation

We do not currently have any non-employee directors and no additional compensation is currently paid to Mr. Frija in connection with his directorship over and above his employee-based compensation.

Code of Ethics

The Company has a code of ethics, “Business Conduct: “Code of Conduct and Policy,” that applies to all of the Company’s employees, including its principal executive officer, principal financial officer and principal accounting officer, and the Board. A copy of this code is available on the Company’s website at www.vapor-corp. The Company intends to disclose any changes in or waivers from its code of ethics by posting such information on its website or by filing a Current Report on Form 8-K.

Item 11. Executive Compensation (Restated)

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE

																						Nonequity				Nonqualified
																						incentive				deferred
Name & Principal														Stock				Option				plan				compensation				All Other
Position(1)(2)		Year				Salary $				Bonus $				Awards $				Awards $				compensation $				earnings $				Compensation $				Total $
Kevin Frija PEO, PAO and Director			2010				72,000				26,000				—				—				—				—				—				98,000
Kevin Frija PEO, PAO and Director			2009				27,000				12,000				—			$	231,300	(1)			—				—				—				270,300

Arrangements with Named Executive Officer

Effective October 1, 2009, we entered into an employment agreement with Mr. Frija to serve as our Chief Executive and sole director. The agreement expired on September 10, 2010 and we have continued to employ Mr. Frija in such positions at the same annual base salary and on at-will basis. The agreement provided for the payment of $72,000 in annual base salary, a one-time bonus of $48,000 payable ratably over a 12 month period and an award of stock options to purchase up to 900,000 shares of our common stock, which vested monthly on a pro-rata basis over 12 months, and are exercisable at $0.45 per share.

Outstanding Equity Awards at 2010 Year-End

The following table presents information regarding the outstanding equity awards held by each of the named executive officers as of December 31, 2010, including the vesting dates for the portions of these awards that had not vested as of that date.

OUTSTANDING EQUITY AWARDS AT FISCAL YEAR-END

OPTION AWARDS

STOCK AWARDS

Equity

Equity

Incentive

Incentive

Plan

Market

Plan

Awards:

Value

Awards:

Market or

Equity

Equity

Number

of

Number

Payout Value

Incentive

Incentive

of

Shares

of

of

Plan

Plan

Shares

or

Unearned

Unearned

Awards:

Awards:

or

Units

Shares,

Shares,

Number

Number of

Number of

Units of

of

Units or

Units

Of

Securities

Securities

Stock

Stock

Other

or other

Securities

Underlying

Underlying

that

that

Rights

Rights

Underlying

Unexercised

Unexercised

Option

Option

have

Have

that

that

Unexercised

Options

Unearned

Exercise

Expiration

not

not

have not

have not

Options

Unexercisable

Options

Price

Date

Vested

Vested

Vested

Vested

Name

Exercisable

(#)

(#)

($)

($)

(#)

($)

(#)

($)

(a)

(#) (b)

(c)

(d)

(e)

(f)

(g)

(h)

(i)

(j)

Kevin Frija, PEO

900,000

—

—

0.45

10/01/2015

—

—

—

—

Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters. Securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans.

Equity Compensation Plan Information

Number of securities

Number of securities to be

Weighted-average exercise

remaining available

issued

price of

for future issuance under

upon exercise of outstanding

outstanding options, warrants and

equity compensation plans

Plan category

options, warrants and rights

rights

(excluding securities reflected in column

(a))

(a)

(b)

(c)

Equity compensation plans approved by security holders

708,000

$

0.375

99,292,000

Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders

4,500,000

$

0.45

—

Total

5,208,000

$

0.439

99,292,000

SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT

Security ownership of certain beneficial owners. The following table provides the names and addresses of each person known to own directly or beneficially more than 5% of our outstanding Common Stock (as determined in accordance with Rule 13d-3 under the Exchange Act) as of December 31, 2010.

		Shares				Percentage of
		Beneficially				Beneficial
Name and address of beneficial owner		Owned(1)				Ownership(1)
5% Stockholders
Adam Frija			4,464,720				7.43	%
Tamar Galazan			5,900,000				9.813	%
Named Executive Officers& Directors
Kevin Frija			4,314,000				7.19	%
Isaac Galazan			4,169,640				16.95	%
Jeffrey Holman			5,625,548				9.36	%
Doron Ziv			6,945,120				11.55	%
All Current Officers and Directors As a Group (4 person)			21,054,308				35.01	%

Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence.

The Company has entered into indemnity agreements its sole officer and director which provides, among other things, that the Company will indemnify such officer or director, under the circumstances and to the extent provided for therein, for expenses, judgments, fines and settlements such officer or director may be required to pay in actions or proceedings which they are or may be made a party by reason of their position as a director, officer or other agent of the Company, and otherwise to the full extent permitted under Nevada law and the Amended and Restated Bylaws of the Company.

We currently contract for warehousing and certain fulfillment services with a company that is jointly owned by our president, Kevin Frija and our shareholder Jacob Levy. Services are rendered on an at will basis and can be cancelled at anytime without notice. We believe that we are receiving more favorable terms than we would be able to receive from an unrelated third party.

Director Independence

The company is currently traded on the FINRA (formerly NASD) Over the Counter Bulletin Board. The OTCBB does not have any director independence requirements. Mr. Frija is presently our sole executive officer and director and as such we do not have an independent board of directors.

We have indemnification agreements with our current director, the directors of our wholly owned and operating subsidiary, our sole officer and some of our key employees.

Other than as described above under this section “Certain Relationships and Related Transactions,” since the beginning of our last fiscal year, we have not entered into any transactions, nor are there any currently proposed transactions, between us and a related party where the amount involved exceeds, or would exceed, $120,000, and in which any related person had or will have a direct or indirect material interest. We believe the terms of the transactions described above were comparable to terms we could have obtained in arm’s length dealings with unrelated third parties.

Item 14. Principal Accounting Fees and Services.

AUDIT FEES

The aggregate fees billed by our auditors, Paritz & Company, P.A., for professional services rendered for the audit of our annual financial statements for fiscal year ended December 31, 2010 and review of our interim financial statements for the third quarter of 2010 was approximately $10,039.

The aggregate fees billed by our auditors for professional services rendered for the audit of our annual financial statements for fiscal year ended December 31, 2010 was approximately $6,274.

AUDIT RELATED FEES

During the last two fiscal years, no fees were billed or incurred for assurance or related services by our auditors that were reasonably related to the audit or review of financial statements reported above.

TAX FEES

Tax preparation fees billed for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2009 was approximately $1,980, we have not yet accrued any tax preparation fees for the Year ending December 31, 2010.

ALL OTHER FEES

During the last two fiscal years, no other fees were billed or incurred for services by our auditors other than the fees noted above.

PART IV

Item 15. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules

(a) Documents filed as part of this report

(1) All financial statements

Index to Audited Consolidated Financial Statements

Audited Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009 (Restated)			39
Audited Consolidated Statements of Operations for the two years ended December 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009 (Restated)			40
Audited Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’ Equity for the two years ended December 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009 (Restated)			41
Audited Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the two years ended December 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009 (Restated)			42
Notes to Audited Consolidated Financial Statements			44
Report of Paritz & Company, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm			38

(2) Financial Statement Schedules

All financial statement schedules have been omitted, since the required information is not applicable or is not present in amounts sufficient to require submission of the schedule, or because the information required is included in the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto.

(b) Exhibits required by Item 601 of Regulation S-K

The information required by this Item is set forth on the exhibit index that follows the signature page of this report.

Paritz & Company, P.A.

VAPOR CORP.
(FORMERLY MILLER DIVERSIFIED CORPORATION)

CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(RESTATED)
(NOTE 8)
WITH
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED ACCOUNTING FIRM

As of DECEMBER 31, 2010 AND 2009

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED ACCOUNTING FIRM

Board of Directors
Vapor Corp.
(formerly Miller Diversified Corporation)
Hallandale, Florida

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Vapor Corp. (formerly Miller Diversified Corporation) (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2010 and 2009 and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity and cash flows for the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audit included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

As discussed in Note 8 to the consolidated financial statements, the accompanying consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2010 and 2009 and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity and cash flows for the years then ended have been restated.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Vapor Corp. (formerly Miller Diversified Corporation), as of December 31, 2010 and 2009 and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the year then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

PARITZ & COMPANY, P.A.

Hackensack, New Jersey

March 26, 2011(except for the effect of the restatement discussed in Note 8 to the consolidated financial statements, for which the date is August 18, 2011).

VAPOR CORP.
(FORMERLY MILLER DIVERSIFIED CORPORATION)

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

		DECEMBER 31,
		2010				2009
		(Restated)				(Restated)
ASSETS
CURRENT ASSETS:
Cash		$	65,734			$	841
Due from merchant credit card processor, net of reserve for charge-backs of $80,000 and $60,000, respectively			499,485				361,623
Accounts receivable, net of allowance of $5,000			304,391				—
Vendor deposits			—				169,424
Inventories			924,809				827,412
Sundry current assets			4,713				—
TOTAL CURRENT ASSETS			1,799,132				1,359,300
TOTAL ASSETS		$	1,799,132			$	1,359,300
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
CURRENT LIABILITIES:
Accounts payable and accrued expenses		$	1,001,122			$	453,823
Income taxes payable			173,471				202,000
TOTAL CURRENT LIABILITIES			1,174,593				655,823
STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY:
Preferred stock, $.001 par value, 1,000,000 shares authorized, none issued			—				—
Common stock, $.001 par value, 250,000,000 shares authorized 60,135,344 and 60,000,344 shares issued and outstanding, in 2010 and 2009, respectively			60,135				60,000
Additional paid-in capital			1,537,776				614,625
(Accumulated deficit) retained earnings			(973,372	)			28,852
TOTAL STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY			624,539				703,477
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY		$	1,799,132			$	1,359,300

See notes to audited consolidated financial statements

VAPOR CORP.
(FORMERLY MILLER DIVERSIFIED CORPORATION)

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME

		YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
		2010				2009
		(Restated)				(Restated)
SALES		$	10,917,101			$	7,957,247
COSTS AND EXPENSES:
Cost of sales			6,058,297				3,039,301
Selling, general and administrative			4,958,492				4,381,215
Stock-based compensation expense			901,536				289,125
TOTAL COSTS AND EXPENSES			11,918,325				7,709,641
(LOSS) INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAXES			(1,001,224	)			247,606
Income taxes			1,000				202,000
NET (LOSS) INCOME		$	(1,002,224	)		$	45,606
BASIC AND DILUTED NET (LOSS) INCOME PER COMMON SHARE		$	(0.02	)		$	0.00
WEIGHTED AVERAGE NUMBER OF COMMON SHARES OUTSTANDING — BASIC AND DILUTED			60,040,015				60,000,344

See notes to audited consolidated financial statements

VAPOR CORP.
(FORMERLY MILLER DIVERSIFIED CORPORATION)

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (RESTATED)

										Additional				(Accumulated Deficit)
		Common Shares								Paid-In				Retained
		Number				Amount				Capital				Earnings				Total
BALANCE — JANUARY 1, 2009			100			$	100			$	375,400			$	(16,754	)		$	358,746
Elimination of Miller Diversified Corporation equity and common stock in connection with reverse merger			60,000,244				59,900				(59,900	)			—				—
Additional investment by stockholder			—				—				10,000				—				10,000
Stock-based compensation expense											289,125								289,125
Net income			—				—				—				45,606				45,606
BALANCE — DECEMBER 31, 2009			60,000,344				60,000				614,625				28,852				703,477
Stock-based compensation expense											901,536
Stock issued for services			135,000				135				21,615				—				21,750
Net loss			—				—				—				(1,002,224	)			(1,0002,224	)
BALANCE — DECEMBER 31, 2010			60,135,344			$	60,135			$	1,537,776			$	(973,372	)		$	624,539

See notes to audited consolidated financial statements

VAPOR CORP.
(FORMERLY MILLER DIVERSIFIED CORPORATION)

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

		YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
		2010				2009
		(Restated)				(Restated)
OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net (loss) income		$	(1,002,224	)		$	45,606
Adjustments to reconcile net (loss) income to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities:
Stock-based compensation expense			901,536				289,125
Reserve for charge-backs			20,000				30,000
Stock issued for services			21,750				—
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Due from merchant credit card processor			(137,862	)			(391,623	)
Accounts receivable			(324,391	)
Vendor deposits			169,424				(109,424	)
Inventories			(97,397	)			(816,099	)
Sundry current assets			(4,713	)			4,755
Accounts payable and accrued expenses			547,332				445,929
Income taxes payable			(28,562	)			202,000
Customer deposits			—				(21,190	)
NET CASH PROVIDED BY (USED IN) OPERATING ACTIVITIES			64,893				(320,921	)
FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Additional investment by shareholder			—				10,000
NET CASH PROVIDED BY FINANCING ACTIVITIES			—				10,000
INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH			64,893				(310,921	)
CASH — BEGINNING OF YEAR			841				311,762
CASH — END OF YEAR		$	65,734			$	841

See notes to audited consolidated financial statements

VAPOR CORP.
(FORMERLY MILLER DIVERSIFIED CORPORATION)

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

DECEMBER 31, 2010 and 2009

1

SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

		Business description
		Vapor Corp. (formerly Miller Diversified Corporation) (“Miller”) is the holding company for its wholly owned subsidiary Smoke Anywhere U.S.A., Inc. (“Smoke”). The Company markets and distributes electronic cigarettes under the Fifty-OneTM, KraveTM, EZ SmokerTM and Green PufferTM brands.
		On September 1, 2009 Miller on entered into a definitive agreement with Smoke, a Florida Corporation, whereby Miller acquired 100% of the issued and outstanding shares of Smoke. As a result of the transaction, Smoke became a wholly owned subsidiary of Miller. On November 5, 2009 Miller and Smoke completed, subject to certain post-closing undertakings, the transaction. For accounting purposes, this transaction is being accounted for as a reverse merger, since the stockholders of Smoke own a majority of the issued and outstanding shares of common stock of Miller and the directors and executive officers of Smoke now own and control in excess of 80% of Miller’s outstanding stock.
		The merger has been accounted for as a reverse merger under the acquisition method of accounting because there was a change of control. Accordingly, Smoke is treated as the continuing entity for accounting purposes, whereas the entity formally known as Miller is the legal surviving entity.
		Use of estimates in the preparation of financial statements
		The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of net revenue and expenses during each reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
		Cash
		The Company maintains cash balances at various financial institutions. Accounts at each institution are insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation up to $250,000. The Company’s accounts at these institutions may, at times, exceed the Federally insured limits. The Company has not experienced any losses in such accounts.

		Inventories
		Inventories, consisting of merchandise purchased for resale, are valued at the lower of cost (determined on the first-in, first-out basis) or market (replacement cost).
		Revenue recognition
		The Company recognizes revenue from product sales or services rendered when the following four revenue recognition criteria are met: persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, delivery has occurred or services have been rendered, the selling price is fixed or determinable, and collectability is reasonably assured.
		Product sales and shipping revenues, net of promotional discounts, rebates, and return allowances, are recorded when the products are shipped and title passes to customers. Retail sales to customers are made pursuant to a sales contract that provides for transfer of both title and risk of loss upon the Company’s delivery to the carrier. Return allowances, which reduce product revenue, are estimated using historical experience. Revenue from product sales and services rendered is recorded net of sales and consumption taxes.
		The Company periodically provides incentive offers to its customers to encourage purchases. Such offers include current discount offers, such as percentage discounts off current purchases, inducement offers, such as offers for future discounts subject to a minimum current purchase, and other similar offers. Current discount offers, when accepted by the Company’s customers, are treated as a reduction to the purchase price of the related transaction, while inducement offers, when accepted by its customers, are treated as a reduction to purchase price based on estimated future redemption rates. Redemption rates are estimated using the Company’s historical experience for similar inducement offers. Current discount offers and inducement offers are presented as a net amount in “net sales.”
		Advertising
		The Company expenses advertising as incurred. As of December 31, 2010 and 2009, the Company incurred advertising expenses of $1,830,000 and $970,806, respectively.
		Stock-Based Compensation
		The Company accounts for stock-based compensation under ASC Topic 718, “Compensation-Stock Compensation (“ASC Topic 718”). These standards define a fair value based method of accounting for stock-based compensation. In accordance with ASC Topic 718, the cost of stock-based compensation is measured at the grant date based on the value of the award and is recognized over the vesting period. The value of the stock-based award is determined using the Black-Scholes-Merton valuation model, whereby compensation cost is the excess of the fair value of the award as determined by the valuation model at the grant date or other measurement date over the amount that must be paid to acquire the stock. The resulting amount is charged to expense on the straight-line basis over the period in which the Company expects to receive the benefit,

		which is generally the vesting period. During the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, the Company recognized stock based compensation expense of $901,536 and $289,125, respectively. The $901,536 and $289,125 relates to the amortization expense associated with the granting of options to its President and Chief Executive Officer to purchase 900,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at an exercise price of $0.45 per share in October 2009 which vested in 12 equal monthly installments valued at $231,300 and from the granting of options to employees and consultants to purchase 3,600,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at an exercise price of $0.45 per share in October 2009 which vested in 12 equal monthly installments valued at $925,000 and 708,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at an exercise price of $0.375 per share in January 2010 which vest in 4 equal annual installments valued at $136,644.
		Reverse Stock Split
		On February 10, 2010, the Company effected a 2.5:1 reverse stock split on its then outstanding shares of common stock. As a result of the reverse stock split, the outstanding shares of the Company’s common stock were reduced to 10,000,000 from 50,000,000. In connection therewith, fractional shares were rounded up to whole shares and as a result, an additional 344 shares of common stock were issued to certain stockholders of the Company. No consideration was received by the Company for the shares of its common stock issued as a result of rounding up the fractional shares. All share amounts in the accompanying audited consolidated financial statements have been adjusted to give effect to this reverse stock split.
		New accounting pronouncements
		From time to time, new accounting pronouncements are issued by the Financial Accounting Standards Board or other standard setting bodies that may have an impact on the Company’s accounting and reporting. The Company believes that such recently issued accounting pronouncements and other authoritative guidance for which the effective date is in the future either will not have an impact on its accounting or reporting or that such impact will not be material to its financial position, results of operations and cash flows when implemented.

2

DUE FROM MERCHANT CREDIT CARD PROCESSOR

Due from merchant credit card processor represents monies held in reserve by the Company’s former credit card processors. The funds are expected to be released to the Company no later than June 30, 2011 pending satisfaction of their reserve requirements and expiration of charge backs/refunds from customers.

3

INCOME TAXES

The income tax expense (benefit) consists of the following:

		—Year ended December 31,—
		2010				2009
Federal:
Current		$	900			$	173,000
Deferred			(3,000	)			—
State:
Current			100				29,000
Deferred			(1,000	)			—
Change in valuation allowance			4,000				—
Income tax expense		$	1,000			$	202,000

		—Year ended December 31,—
		2010				2009
U.S. Federal statutory rate			-2	%			34	%
State income tax, net of Federal benefits			-1	%			4	%
Increase in valuation allowance			4	%			—
Income tax expense			1	%			38	%

		—Year ended December 31,—
		2010				2009
Deferred tax asset
Net operating loss		$	4,000			$	—
Total deferred tax asset			4,000				—
Valuation allowance			(4,000	)			—
Deferred tax asset, net of valuation allowance		$	—			$	—

4

RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

The Company utilizes the services of an entity that is owned 50% by the CEO of the Company. The entity performs fulfillment services and leasing of warehouse space for the Company at a cost that is approximately equal to what these services would cost from an unrelated third party. Amounts paid to this entity for the year ended December 31, 2010 approximately $65,000.

5

LEASE COMMITMENTS

		The Company is obligated under an operating lease for its Florida office, which calls for minimum annual rentals of $23,000. The lease expires in December 2010.
		Rental expense charged to operations for the year ended December 31, 2010 aggregated approximately $26,000.

6

CONTINGENCIES, LITIGATION AND GENERAL COMMENTS

The Company is subject to various legal proceedings and claims, which have arisen in the ordinary course of its business and have not been fully adjudicated. These actions, when ultimately concluded and determined, will not, in the opinion of management, have a material adverse effect on results of operations or the financial condition of the Company.

7

SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

Management evaluated all activity of the Company through March 26, 2011 (the issue date of the financial statements). There were no material subsequent events as of that date.

8

RESTATEMENT

The Company has restated its consolidated financial statements as at December 31, 2010 and 2009 because the Company failed to record stock-based compensation expense for employee and non-employee stock options in accordance with ASC Topic 718, “Compensation-Stock Compensation and the Company failed to properly calculate the weighted average number of common shares outstanding. This error and the related adjustments resulted in an understatement of net loss and additional paid in capital of $901,536 and $1,190,661, respectively, and an overstatement of retained earnings of $1,190,661 for the year ended December 31, 2010. This error and the related adjustments resulted in an understatement of net loss and additional paid in capital of $289,125 and $289,125, respectively, and an overstatement of retained earnings of $289,125 for the year ended December 31, 2009. Accordingly, the Company’s consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2010 and 2009 have been restated to correct for these errors.

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet impact —

The following table sets forth the effects of the restatement adjustments on the Company’s condensed consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2010 and 2009:

VAPOR CORP.
f/k/a MILLER DIVERSIFIED CORPORATION
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

		As of December 31, 2010								As of December 31, 2009
		As Previously								As Previously
		Recorded				As Restated				Recorded				As Restated
TOTAL ASSETS		$	1,799,132			$	1,799,132			$	1,359,300			$	1,359,300
TOTAL LIABILITIES		$	1,174,593			$	1,174,593			$	655,823			$	655,823
STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Preferred Stock, $0.001 par value, 1,000,000 shares authorized, none issued			—				—				—				—
Common stock, .001 par value; 250,000,000 shares authorized, 60,135,344 and 60,000,344 issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively			60,135				60,135				60,000				60,000
Additional paid-in capital			347,115				1,537,776				325,500				614,625
Retained earnings (deficit)			217,289				(973,372	)			317,977				28,852
TOTAL STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY			624,539				624,539				703,477				703,477
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDER EQUITY		$	1,799,132			$	1,799,132			$	1,359,300			$	1,359,300

Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations impact —

The following table set forth the effects of the restatement adjustments on the Company’s condensed consolidated statements of operations for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, 2010:

VAPOR CORP.
f/k/a MILLER DIVERSIFIED CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATEDSTATEMENT OF OPERATIONS

		YEAR ENDED								YEAR ENDED
		DECEMBER 31, 2010								DECEMBER 31, 2009
		As Previously								As Previously
		Recorded				As Restated				Recorded				As Restated
Stock-based compensation expense		$	—			$	901,536			$	—			$	289,125
TOTAL COSTS AND EXPENSES			11,016,789				11,918,325				7,420,516				7,709,641
INCOME (LOSS) BEFORE INCOME TAXES			(99,688	)			(1,001,224	)			536,731				247,606
NET INCOME (LOSS)		$	(100.688	)		$	(1,002,224	)		$	334,731			$	45,606
BASIC AND DILUTED NET INCOME (LOSS) PER COMMON SHARE		$	(0.002	)		$	(0.02	)		$	0.014			$	0.00
Weighted average common shares outstanding — basic and diluted			60,039,436				60,040,015				24,301,159				60,000,344

Condensed Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows impact —

The following table set forth the effects of the restatement adjustments on the Company’s condensed consolidated statement of cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009:

VAPOR CORP.
f/k/a MILLER DIVERSIFIED CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATEDSTATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

		YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2010								YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2009
		As Previously								As Previously
		Recorded				As Restated				Recorded				As Restated
NET INCOME (LOSS)		$	(100,688	)		$	(1,002,224	)		$	334,731			$	45,606
Stock-based compensation expense			—				901,536				—				289,125
NET CASH PROVIDED BY (USED IN) OPERATING ACTIVITIES		$	64,893			$	64,893			$	(320,921	)		$	(320,921	)

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’ Equity impact-

The following table set forth the effects of the restatement adjustments on the Company’s condensed consolidated statements of shareholders’ equity for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009:

VAPOR CORP.
f/k/a MILLER DIVERSIFIED CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATEDSTATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

		YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2009
		As Previously Recorded								As Restated
		Additional				Retained				Additional				Retained
		Paid-In				Earnings				Paid-In				Earnings
		Capital				(Deficit)				Capital				(Deficit)
Stock-based compensation expense		$	—			$	—			$	289,125			$	—
NET INCOME			—				334,731				—				45,606
BALANCE — DECEMBER 31, 2009		$	325,500			$	317,977			$	614,625			$	28,852

		YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2010
		As Previously Recorded								As Restated
		Additional				Retained				Additional				Retained
		Paid-In				Earnings				Paid-In				Earnings
		Capital				(Deficit)				Capital				(Deficit)
Stock-based compensation expense		$	—			$	—			$	901,536			$	—
NET (LOSS)			—				(100,688	)			—				(1,002,224	)
BALANCE — DECEMBER 31, 2010		$	347,115			$	217,289			$	1,537,776			$	(973,372	)

EXHIBIT INDEX

				Incorporated by Reference
						Filing Date/
Exhibit						Period End
Number		Exhibit Description		Form		Date
3.1		Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation, filed with the Secretary of State of the State of Nevada on January 4, 2010.		DEF-14C		12/10/09
3.2		By-Laws of the Registrant, as amended.		8-K		01/10/86
4.1		Form of Stock Certificate of the Registrant.		10-Q		12/30/06
10.1*		VAPOR CORP Equity Incentive Plan.		DEF-14C		12/10/09
14.1		Code of Ethics		10-K		03/31/2010
21.1**		Subsidiaries of the Registrant.
24.1**		Power of Attorney (included on the Signature Page of this Annual Report on Form 10-K).
31.1**		Rule 13a-14(a) / 15d-14(a) Certification of Chief Executive Officer. (Restated)
31.2**		Rule 13a-14(a) / 15d-14(a) Certification of Chief Financial Officer. (Restated)
32.1**		Section 1350 Certifications of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer. (Restated)

SIGNATURES (RESTATED)

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, this 24th day of August 2011.

Power of Attorney

KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS, that each person whose signature appears below constitutes and appoints Kevin Frija attorney-in-fact, each with the power of substitution, for him in any and all capacities, to sign any amendments to this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A, and to file the same, with exhibits thereto and other documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission, hereby ratifying and confirming all that each of said attorneys-in-fact, or his substitute or substitutes, may do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated:

Name		Title		Date
/s/ Kevin Frija   KEVIN FRIJA		Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Director (Principal Executive Officer & Principal Financial Officer)		August 24 , 2011