As filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 19,
2011
Registration
No. 333-
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C.
20549
FORM S-1
REGISTRATION
STATEMENT
UNDER
THE SECURITIES ACT OF
1933
AMBIENT CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as
specified in its charter)
|
|
|
|
|
DELAWARE
|
|
4813
|
|
98-0166007
|
|
(State or other jurisdiction
of
incorporation or organization)
|
|
(Primary Standard Industrial
Classification Code Number)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification Number)
|
7 WELLS AVENUE
NEWTON, MASSACHUSETTS 02459
(617) 332-0004
(Address, including zip code,
and telephone number, including area code, of registrants
principal executive offices)
JOHN J. JOYCE
7 WELLS AVENUE
NEWTON, MASSACHUSETTS 02459
(617) 332-0004
(Name, address, including zip
code, and telephone number, including area code, of agent for
service)
Copies to:
|
|
|
Donna L. Brooks, Esq.
Michael J. Fritz, Esq.
Shipman & Goodwin LLP
One Constitution Plaza
Hartford, Connecticut 06103
Telephone:
(860) 251-5000
Facsimile:
(860) 251-5211
|
|
Robert S. Kant, Esq.
Brian H. Blaney, Esq.
Derek J. Mirza, Esq.
Greenberg Traurig, LLP
2375 East Camelback Road, Suite 700
Phoenix, Arizona 85016
Telephone: (602) 445-8000
Facsimile: (602) 445-8100
|
Approximate Date of Proposed Sale to the
Public: As soon as practicable after this
Registration Statement becomes effective.
If any of the securities being registered on this Form are to be
offered on a delayed or continuous basis pursuant to
Rule 415 under the Securities Act of 1933, check the
following
box. o
If this Form is filed to register additional securities for an
offering pursuant to Rule 462(b) under the Securities Act,
please check the following box and list the Securities Act
registration statement number of the earlier effective
registration statement for the same
offering. o
If this Form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to
Rule 462(c) under the Securities Act, check the following
box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of
the earlier effective registration statement for the same
offering. o
If this Form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to
Rule 462(d) under the Securities Act, check the following
box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of
the earlier effective registration statement for the same
offering. o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large
accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated
filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of
large accelerated filer, accelerated
filer and smaller reporting company in Rule
12b-2 of the
Exchange Act.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated
filer o
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accelerated
filer o
|
Non-accelerated
filer o
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Smaller reporting
company þ
|
CALCULATION
OF REGISTRATION FEE
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proposed Maximum
|
|
|
Amount of
|
Title of Each Class of
|
|
|
Aggregate Offering
|
|
|
Registration
|
Securities to be Registered
|
|
|
Price(1)(2)
|
|
|
Fee
|
Common Stock, par value $0.001 per share
|
|
|
$
|
57,500,000
|
|
|
|
$
|
6,675.75
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Includes shares that the
underwriters have an option to purchase to cover
over-allotments, if any.
|
|
(2)
|
|
Estimated solely for the purpose of
calculating the registration fee pursuant to Rule 457(o) of the
Securities Act of 1933, as amended.
|
The Registrant hereby amends this Registration Statement on
such date or dates as may be necessary to delay its effective
date until the Registrant shall file a further amendment which
specifically states that this Registration Statement shall
thereafter become effective in accordance with Section 8(a)
of the Securities Act of 1933 or until this Registration
Statement shall become effective on such date as the Securities
and Exchange Commission, acting pursuant to said
Section 8(a), may determine.
The information in
this preliminary prospectus is not complete and may be changed.
We may not sell these securities until the registration
statement filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission is
effective. This preliminary prospectus is not an offer to sell
these securities, and it is not soliciting an offer to buy these
securities, in any state or jurisdiction where the offer or sale
is not permitted.
|
SUBJECT TO COMPLETION, DATED
AUGUST 19, 2011
PRELIMINARY
PROSPECTUS
Shares
Common Stock
$
per share
We are
offering shares
of our common stock. Our common stock is listed on the NASDAQ
Capital Market under the symbol AMBT. On
August 18, 2011, the last reported sale price of our common
stock on the NASDAQ Capital Market was $8.20 per share.
Investing in our common stock involves risks. See Risk
Factors beginning on page 11.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per Share
|
|
Total
|
|
Public offering price
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Underwriting discount
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Proceeds, before expenses, to us
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
We have granted the underwriters a
30-day
option to purchase up to an
additional shares
of common stock to cover over-allotments, if any.
Delivery of the shares is expected to be made on or
about ,
2011.
Neither the Securities and Exchange Commission nor any
state securities commission has approved or disapproved of these
securities or passed upon the adequacy or accuracy of this
prospectus. Any representation to the contrary is a criminal
offense.
Stifel Nicolaus
Weisel
|
|
Needham &
Company, LLC |
ThinkEquity LLC |
The date of this prospectus
is ,
2011.
TABLE OF
CONTENTS
You should rely only on the information contained in this
prospectus, any free writing prospectus prepared by us or
information to which we have referred you in this prospectus
when you make a decision about whether to invest in our common
stock. We have not, and the underwriters have not, authorized
anyone to provide you with additional information or information
different from that contained in this prospectus. This
prospectus is not an offer to sell, nor is it seeking offers to
buy, shares of our common stock in any circumstance under which
the offers, sales or solicitations are unlawful or in
jurisdictions where offers, sales or solicitations are not
permitted. The information contained in this prospectus is
accurate only as of the date of this prospectus, regardless of
the time of delivery of this prospectus or of any sale of shares
of our common stock. Our business, prospects, financial
condition and results of operations may have changed since that
date.
In this prospectus, company, we,
us, and our refer to Ambient Corporation
and its subsidiary.
The market data and certain other statistical information used
throughout this prospectus are based on independent industry
publications, governmental publications, reports by market
research firms or other independent sources. Some data are also
based on our good faith estimates.
PROSPECTUS
SUMMARY
You should read the following summary together with the more
detailed information concerning our company, the common stock
being sold in this offering, and our financial statements
appearing elsewhere in this prospectus. Because this is only a
summary, you should read this entire prospectus carefully,
especially the risks described under Risk Factors
beginning on page 11, before you invest in our common
stock.
Overview
We are a leading provider of a smart grid communications
platform that enables utilities to effectively deploy, integrate
and communicate with multiple smart grid applications within the
electric power grid. Our smart grid communications platform
significantly improves the ability of utilities to use advanced
technologies to upgrade their electric power grids, effectively
making the grids more intelligent.
The term smart grid refers to the use of advanced
technologies to upgrade the electric power grid, or the grid,
effectively making the grid more intelligent and efficient. The
grid was largely designed and built decades ago to reliably
distribute electricity from generators to customers in a manner
resulting in sizable capital investments and operating costs. A
number of factors are increasingly straining the grid, including
rapidly growing electricity demand, two-way power flow, the
implementation of renewable and distributed energy sources and
advanced pricing plans. As such, the aging grid is prone to
reliability, security, availability and power quality issues,
costing utilities and consumers billions of dollars each year.
Technology is now revolutionizing the grid and transforming it
into an efficient, communicating energy service platform. We
believe that the smart grid will address the current
shortcomings of the grid and deliver significant benefits to
utilities and consumers of energy, including reduced costs,
increased power reliability and quality, accommodation of
renewable energy technologies, consumer empowerment over energy
consumption and a platform for continued integration of new
technologies.
The Ambient Smart
Grid®
communications platform, which includes hardware, software and
firmware, enables utilities to effectively manage smart grid
applications. Our communications platform provides utilities
with a secure, two-way, flexible and open Internet protocol, or
IP, architecture that efficiently networks smart grid
applications and different technologies within each application
and supports multiple communications technologies currently used
by utilities, such as Wi-Fi, radio frequency, cellular
technologies, power line communications, serial and Ethernet.
Today, our communications platform enables the simultaneous
integration and parallel communication of multiple smart grid
applications provided by a variety of vendors, including smart
metering, demand response and distribution automation. We
believe that the Ambient Smart
Grid®
communications platform delivers significant benefits to
utilities, including support of a single network; an open,
scalable and interoperable platform; preservation of utility
investments; third-party application hosting; remote and
distributed intelligence; secure communications; and reduced
overall implementation and operating costs.
The Ambient Smart
Grid®
products and services include communications nodes; a network
management system,
AmbientNMS®;
integrated applications; and maintenance and consulting
services. The communications nodes, our principal product, are
physical boxes that contain the hardware and software needed for
communications and data collection in support of smart grid
assets. We have configured our communications nodes to act as
individual data processors and collectors that receive signals
from other networked devices, enabling smart grid applications.
Duke Energy, our premier customer, has deployed approximately
55,000 of our communications nodes that receive data from smart
electric and gas meters, using a variety of communications
technologies, and process and transmit these data to the utility
back office over a cellular carrier network for further
processing. Furthermore, our communications nodes, in the fourth
generation of development, also accommodate integrated
applications that include our own developed technology and
1
third-party technology, thereby substantially increasing their
functionality. By enabling such system interoperability, our
communications platform both reduces implementation and ongoing
communications costs and improves overall power management
efficiencies. We believe that, to date, no other single solution
or technology has provided the necessary flexibility in a
cost-effective manner, enabling a comprehensive digital
communications platform while leveraging standards-based
technologies. We developed our communications platform to
specifically fill this void.
Our long-standing relationship with Duke Energy, which we
believe has one of the most forward-looking smart grid
initiatives in North America, has led to rapid growth in our
business. We entered into a long-term agreement in September
2009 with Duke Energy, currently our sole customer, to supply
Duke Energy with our Ambient Smart
Grid®
communications platform and license our
AmbientNMS®
through 2015. We increased revenue from $2.2 million in
2009 to $20.4 million in 2010 and generated
$28.0 million of additional revenue in the first six months
of 2011. As of June 30, 2011, we had backlog of
approximately $68 million, consisting of products that we
expect to deliver into 2012. We believe that there exists a
significant opportunity for growth with Duke Energy and with
Progress Energy, upon the anticipated completion of the proposed
merger of Duke Energy and Progress Energy announced in January
2011. We also intend to leverage our success with Duke Energy to
secure additional customers.
Industry
Overview
The
Electric Power Distribution Grid
The grid was largely designed and built decades ago. As a
result, the aging grid is prone to reliability, security,
availability and power quality issues, costing utilities and
consumers billions of dollars each year. The following factors
highlight the deficiencies of todays grid:
Increasing Energy Demand. Worldwide economies and
populations are expanding and that expansion and the
proliferation of electronic devices require more, and higher
quality, electricity. The increased energy demand has already
begun, and will increasingly continue, to strain the reliability
and integrity of the grid.
Severely Strained and Aging Grid. The strain on the
grid has led to efficiency losses, service interruptions, higher
electricity rates and costly unplanned maintenance and repair
expenses. As consumers and industries increase their reliance on
electronic devices, these disturbances and quality issues will
become more disruptive and more costly.
Inability of the Grid to Support Proliferation of Renewable
Energy and Related Technologies. Over the past few years,
utilities and consumers have increased their adoption of
centralized and distributed renewable energy, such as wind,
solar and energy storage technologies, as a source of
electricity. Furthermore, expected growth in electric vehicles
will create the need for charging stations, placing additional
strain on the grid. The grid will not be able to accommodate all
of these renewable energy initiatives.
Limited Real-Time Operational Insight, Communication and
Analysis. The century-old grid in the United States
consists of over 300,000 miles of transmission lines and
over 1,000,000 megawatts of generating capacity. The importance
of todays grid to modern society is unquestionable;
however, it remains largely untouched by modern networking and
communications technologies. The lack of these technologies has
also had a limiting effect on the ability of utilities to engage
with their customers and for customers to take an active role in
their consumption and cost of energy and resources.
2
The Smart
Grid
We believe that the smart grid transformation will address the
shortcomings of the current grid as well as deliver significant
benefits to utilities and consumers of energy. The smart grid
encompasses multiple technologies and applications and
represents significantly more than just smart electric meters.
The term smart grid refers to the use of advanced
communications technologies and modern computing capabilities to
upgrade the electric power grid (and even other utility
infrastructures, such as gas and water), effectively making the
grid more intelligent and efficient. We believe that the
implementation of intelligent and seamless communication across
the grid represents the largest expected wave of information
technology spending, similar to the previous telecommunications
and Internet investment cycles.
Smart
Grid Requirements
The success of the smart grid, with its promise of delivering
significant benefits to utilities, consumers and the
environment, will depend upon the successful implementation of
smart grid applications that rely on a network communications
infrastructure. Key requirements of the smart grid include the
following:
Communications Platform. A secure, flexible and open
communications platform is required to enable the smart grid.
The communications platform provides real-time, two-way
information flow from multiple smart grid applications to a
network management system at a utilitys operations center,
providing the critical foundation upon which a utility deploys
its smart grid applications.
Interoperability. Various agencies, including the
U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology and the
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, are
developing specific smart grid standards that will allow for
software and hardware components from different applications,
vendors and technologies to seamlessly work together.
Scalability. As utilities incorporate millions of
smart grid devices into the grid, all of which will generate
vast amounts of information, the communications platform must
both support all connected applications in parallel and allow
for quick and cost-effective deployment of new smart grid
devices and new applications.
Security. With increasing threats of cyber-attacks
and the corresponding increased sophistication of malicious
technology, communications infrastructure must provide security
to protect the assets of the utility, preserve the reliability
of the grid and protect consumers.
Cost Effectiveness. An interoperable, scalable and
flexible communications platform allows a utility to deploy a
single platform for all smart grid applications, reducing
operation and maintenance costs associated with running separate
networks. A flexible communications platform also allows
utilities to avoid stranding assets by incorporating legacy
technologies into more advanced systems, while also providing a
platform for future technologies.
Smart
Grid Benefits
The following represent some of the most significant benefits of
the smart grid:
Reduces Costs for Utilities and Consumers. To meet
the growing demand for electricity, utilities will need to
invest substantial capital for added generation and transmission
and distribution infrastructure. However, utilities can save
costs associated with this investment through increased energy
efficiency with the grid, reducing transmission congestion and
preserving reserve capacity resulting from the deployment of
smart grid applications.
3
Increases Power Reliability and Quality. The smart
grids two-way communications capabilities provide
real-time information about the grids electricity
characteristics, such as current and voltage, allowing grid
operators and smart devices to identify and optimize how
electricity flows through the grid.
Accommodates Renewable Energy Sources and Electric
Vehicles. Utilities need smart grid technologies to
support the widespread adoption of renewable energy sources,
electric vehicles and other clean technology solutions. The
intermittent nature of renewable electricity, the developing
energy storage technologies and the demand of electric vehicles
all create challenges for utilities in matching energy
generating sources with demand.
Facilitates Consumer Empowerment. Two-way
communication will allow consumers to proactively monitor and
control the way in which they consume electricity, which will
ultimately help consumers to lower their electricity bills.
Utilities can also develop improved pricing practices aimed at
creating a more efficient pricing structure that addresses
potential pricing inequalities during normal and peak demand
cycles.
Provides a Platform for Technology Innovation. The
smart grid will allow for the seamless integration of new
technologies into the grid without the need to substantially
change existing infrastructure, thereby avoiding significant
capital costs required to support ever-evolving technologies.
Our
Solution
The
Ambient Smart
Grid®
Communications Platform
The Ambient Smart
Grid®
communications platform, which includes hardware, software and
firmware, enables utilities to both effectively manage smart
grid applications and directly integrate certain applications
into our products themselves. Our communications platform
provides a utility with a secure, two-way, flexible and open IP
architecture that efficiently networks smart grid applications
and different technologies within each application and supports
multiple communications technologies currently used by
utilities, such as Wi-Fi, radio frequency, cellular
technologies, power line communications, serial and Ethernet.
Our communications platform enables the integration of smart
grid applications, such as smart metering, demand response,
distribution automation and monitoring, and direct load control.
It also provides an open and flexible platform allowing for the
addition of multiple applications, as well as enhancements and
future applications.
Our Ambient Smart
Grid®
communications nodes are attached on or near a utilitys
transformer and they support applications and connectivity to
devices that comprise the smart grid. These communications nodes
are physical boxes we designed for use in the harsh, outdoor
environments in which utilities operate. Our network management
system, known as
AmbientNMS®,
manages the large numbers of devices on a smart grid network. By
enabling such system interoperability, our communications
platform both reduces implementation and ongoing communications
costs and improves overall power management efficiencies.
Furthermore, our communications nodes also accommodate smart
grid applications installed directly into the communications
nodes, which include our own developed technology and
third-party technology, thereby substantially increasing their
functionality.
Ambient
Smart
Grid®
Benefits
Our products offer the following benefits to utilities:
Support of a Single Network Through Flexible
Communications. Our communications nodes support
multiple communication technologies simultaneously, allowing a
utility to leverage a single communications
4
platform to support many smart grid applications that rely on
different communication technologies, such as cellular, Wi-Fi,
900MHz radio frequency, power line carrier, serial and Ethernet,
all operating in parallel in a single communications node.
Open Platform for Scalability and
Interoperability. The
AmbientNMS,®
or third-party management systems, can manage our open
communications platform. Our communications platform offers
flexibility that allows utilities to deploy multiple smart grid
applications from multiple vendors, including our competitors,
and it can evolve with new technologies.
Preservation of Utility Smart Grid Investments. The
flexibility and open architecture of our communications platform
protect a utility against stranding existing assets, including
an investment in our communications platform itself. It is a
major impediment for utility smart grid investment if a utility
is not able to recover, or is concerned about recovering, the
costs of previously deployed assets. As utilities gradually
replace legacy smart grid assets with current technologies
throughout the natural replacement cycle, they can seamlessly
integrate into our existing communications nodes and
communications platform, eliminating the need for a costly,
wholesale deployment as smart grid technologies and applications
continue to evolve.
Local Application Hosting and Development
Framework. We have designed our communications nodes to
host both Ambient-developed applications and third-party
applications. By leveraging our open communications platform,
excess processing power and flash memory, we can integrate smart
grid applications for utilities directly into our communications
nodes, expanding their overall functionality.
Remote and Distributed Intelligence. Our
communications nodes are equipped with powerful processing
capabilities that allow for local management and control of
smart grid data, which may be aggregated from multiple smart
grid applications. Processing and storage capabilities within
the communications nodes allow a utility to more efficiently
manage a vast amount of distributed data.
Secure Communications. We secure our communications
platform through the use of both physical tamper detection
features and secure protocols that encrypt data traffic.
Reduced Overall Communications Implementation and Operating
Costs. We deliver our communications platform
completely preconfigured to the needs of the utility, allowing
for a rapid and simplified deployment. Furthermore, there is no
need for a utility to develop and invest in separate,
application-specific communications platforms in order to
integrate all smart grid-related assets because our
communications platform provides for a single network that can
accommodate a variety of applications and technologies in
parallel.
Duke
Energy Relationship
Since 2005, we have been a key strategic partner of Duke Energy
and we believe the leading supplier of its smart grid
communications technology in connection with its smart grid
implementation. With what we believe is one of the most
forward-looking smart grid initiatives in North America, Duke
Energy announced plans to invest $1 billion over the next
five years in smart grid equipment for its service territories,
including Ohio, Indiana, Kentucky and the Carolinas.
We believe that we are the predominant provider of
communications nodes and network management system software for
Duke Energys Ohio deployment and we believe that Duke
Energy will continue to predominantly use our communications
platform for the remainder of its Ohio smart grid deployment.
Throughout the past five years, we have worked with Duke Energy
to develop our communications platform, which has enabled Duke
Energys ability to rapidly deploy its smart grid
initiatives. Through July 2011, Duke
5
Energy has deployed approximately 55,000 of our communications
nodes, primarily relating to its Ohio Smart grid implementation.
We believe that we have a substantial opportunity to grow our
business with Duke Energy. In January 2011, Duke Energy and
Progress Energy announced a proposed merger that is subject to
stockholder and regulatory approval. Together, Duke Energy and
Progress Energy have committed to spend a combined
$1.5 billion in smart grid initiatives, partially funded by
approximately $400 million in total grants awarded to them
in 2010 under the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of
2009, or ARRA, and required to be spent by 2013. In addition to
the 130,000 communications nodes scheduled for deployment in
Ohio, we estimate that Duke Energy would require over 670,000
communications nodes if it implements a full deployment of smart
grid communications nodes in Indiana, Kentucky and the
Carolinas. If Duke Energy and Progress Energy complete their
proposed merger and the combined company adopts Duke
Energys deployment strategy relating to smart grid
initiatives, we estimate a potential deployment of 620,000
additional communications nodes in Progress Energys
territories in Florida and the Carolinas.
Competitive
Strengths
We believe that the following competitive strengths help us to
maintain a leading position in providing smart grid
communications solutions to utilities:
Proven Technology. Since 2008, Duke Energy has
successfully deployed our communications platform. With the
deployment of approximately 55,000 communications nodes
providing the connectivity for a variety of smart grid
applications, we have demonstrated that our technology is
quickly scalable and highly reliable.
Premier Utility Customer. Duke Energy is one of the
largest utilities in the United States with what we believe to
be one of the most forward-looking smart grid initiatives in
North America. We have served as a strategic partner of Duke
Energys smart grid programs since 2005. We believe that
other utilities will adopt Duke Energys vision of
implementing a communications platform that can accommodate a
variety of smart grid applications and communications
technologies, moving beyond a focus on smart meters, in order to
realize the full benefits of the smart grid.
Communications Focused. Since 2000, we have
maintained a focus on the development of a communications
platform that meets the needs of utilities. Our commitment to
this market segment allows us to focus all research and
development and engineering efforts on meeting the challenges of
this market and rapidly responding to customer needs. Our focus,
experience and industry know-how, built over three increasingly
robust generations of our current communications platform, allow
us to quickly react to the ever-changing and individualized
needs of utilities.
Purpose-Built Products. Our substantial industry
experience and relationship with Duke Energy have led to the
development of products that are purpose-built for the harsh,
outdoor environments in which utilities must operate. We have
designed our equipment for direct placement onto the
distribution infrastructure, which exposes it to the natural
elements, without the need for an additional enclosure. Further,
the internal elements of our communications nodes which includes
hardened components, battery backups, excess surge protection
and other components. Preconfigured and self-registering
communications nodes allow for rapid and safe installation and
eliminate the need for on-site field engineers, reducing
installation time and cost.
6
Our
Growth Strategy
Our objective is to maintain our market leadership position in
providing a communications and application platform that enables
a utilitys comprehensive smart grid initiatives. The
following key initiatives comprise our growth strategy:
Expand Our Relationship with Duke Energy. We plan to
expand our relationship with Duke Energy as it continues its
smart grid deployment initiatives in additional service
territories and with additional applications. We expect that, as
Duke Energy deploys smart grid assets in other regions,
including Indiana, Kentucky and the Carolinas, a significant
opportunity exists for us to provide hundreds of thousands of
our communications nodes. Finally, if Duke Energy and Progress
Energy complete their proposed merger, we believe that we will
have further expansion opportunities.
Secure New Utility Customers. We intend to leverage
our successful commercial deployment with Duke Energy to secure
new domestic and international customers that are evaluating
communications platforms to accommodate and integrate a variety
of smart grid applications. These new customers may include
utilities that have already deployed smart meter-centric systems
and utilities that are still developing their smart grid plans.
Establish Strategic Relationships. We plan to form
additional strategic relationships with smart grid application
vendors, including meter manufacturers, distribution automation
equipment manufacturers, communications providers and other key
value-added providers in the smart grid industry. By
establishing such relationships, we believe that we can
accelerate the sales of our products.
Continue Product Innovation and Development. We will
continue to invest in the development of new capabilities for
our communications platform in order to meet the evolving needs
of utilities. We have released three generations of our Ambient
Smart
Grid®
products, and we are currently in the final testing stages of
our fourth generation products, which we expect to begin
shipping in the first half of 2012. With our commitment to
research and development, we believe that we will provide
significantly improved products with greater functionality
delivered at lower cost than previously released products.
Selected
Risk Factors
Our business is subject to a number of risks that you should
understand before making an investment decision. We more fully
discuss these risks in the Risk Factors section of
this prospectus. These risks include the following:
|
|
|
|
|
We currently depend on one customer, Duke Energy, for
substantially all of our revenue, and any material delay,
reduction or cancellation of orders from this customer would
significantly reduce our revenue and have a material negative
impact on our business.
|
|
|
We have never achieved profitability on an annual basis, and we
may be unable to achieve or maintain profitability in future
periods.
|
|
|
Utility industry sales cycles can be lengthy and unpredictable,
which can negatively impact our ability to expand the deployment
of our products with Duke Energy and to secure new customers.
|
|
|
The market for our products and services, and smart grid
technology generally, is still developing and we will have
difficulty expanding our business and securing new customers if
the market develops less extensively or more slowly than we
expect.
|
|
|
Because the markets for our products are highly competitive, we
may lose sales to our competitors, which would harm our revenue
and operating results.
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
If we are unable to keep pace with technological innovations and
are unable to continue to develop new products and product
enhancements, we may be unable to expand our business with Duke
Energy or secure new customers.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our inability to protect our intellectual property could impair
our competitive advantage, reduce our revenue and increase our
costs.
|
|
|
Our principal stockholder will continue to be able to exert
substantial influence over us.
|
Our
Corporate Information
Ambient is a Delaware corporation that was incorporated in 1996.
Our principal offices are located at 7 Wells Avenue, Newton,
Massachusetts 02459, and our telephone number is
(617) 332-0004.
Our common stock is listed on the NASDAQ Capital Market under
the symbol AMBT. We maintain a website at
www.ambientcorp.com. Information contained on our website
is not part of this prospectus, and the inclusion of our website
address in this prospectus is an inactive textual reference only.
THE
OFFERING
|
|
|
Common stock offered by us |
|
shares |
|
Over-allotment option offered by us |
|
shares |
|
Common stock to be outstanding after this offering |
|
shares |
|
Use of proceeds |
|
We intend to use the net proceeds from this offering for general
corporate purposes, which may include working capital and
capital expenditures. |
|
Risk factors |
|
You should read the Risk Factors section of this
prospectus for a discussion of the factors to consider carefully
before deciding to invest in shares of our common stock. |
|
NASDAQ Capital Market symbol |
|
AMBT |
The number of shares of our common stock outstanding after this
offering is based on 16,532,228 shares outstanding as of
August 15, 2011 and excludes:
|
|
|
|
|
an aggregate of 1,174,715 shares issuable upon the exercise
of then outstanding stock options at a weighted average exercise
price of $11.18 per share;
|
|
|
an aggregate of 1,151,807 shares issuable upon the exercise
of then outstanding warrants at a weighted average exercise
price of $16.29 per share; and
|
|
|
an aggregate of 2,322,916 shares reserved for issuance
under our 2000 Equity Incentive Plan and 2002 Non-Employee
Directors Stock Option Plan.
|
Unless otherwise indicated, all information in this prospectus
assumes no exercise of the underwriters over-allotment
option and has been adjusted to reflect the
1-for-100
reverse stock split of our common stock that became effective on
July 18, 2011.
8
SUMMARY
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL DATA
The following consolidated financial data should be read
together with our consolidated financial statements and related
notes and Managements Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations appearing
elsewhere in this prospectus. We have derived the following
consolidated statement of operations data and cash flow data for
the years ended December 31, 2008, 2009 and 2010 and
consolidated balance sheet data as of December 31, 2009 and
2010 from our audited consolidated financial statements included
elsewhere in this prospectus. We have derived the following
consolidated statement of operations data and cash flow data for
the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2007 and consolidated
balance sheet data as of December 31, 2006, 2007 and 2008
from our audited financial statements which are not included in
this prospectus. We have derived the following consolidated
statement of operations data and cash flow data for the six
months ended June 30, 2010 and 2011 and the consolidated
balance sheet data as of June 30, 2011 from our unaudited
consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this
prospectus. We have derived the consolidated balance sheet data
as of June 30, 2010 from our unaudited consolidated
financial statements which are not included in this prospectus.
The unaudited consolidated financial statements include, in our
opinion, all adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring
adjustments that we consider necessary for the fair presentation
of the financial information set forth in those statements.
Share and per share information have been adjusted to reflect
the
1-for-100
reverse stock split of our common stock that became effective on
July 18, 2011. Our historical results are not necessarily
indicative of our results to be expected for the remainder of
2011 or in any future period.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS DATA:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue
|
|
$
|
2,337
|
|
|
$
|
2,265
|
|
|
$
|
12,622
|
|
|
$
|
2,193
|
|
|
$
|
20,358
|
|
|
$
|
6,258
|
|
|
$
|
27,993
|
|
Cost of goods sold
|
|
|
1,751
|
|
|
|
1,806
|
|
|
|
9,942
|
|
|
|
1,836
|
|
|
|
12,023
|
|
|
|
3,782
|
|
|
|
15,963
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
586
|
|
|
|
459
|
|
|
|
2,680
|
|
|
|
357
|
|
|
|
8,335
|
|
|
|
2,476
|
|
|
|
12,030
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research and development expenses
|
|
|
3,559
|
|
|
|
3,675
|
|
|
|
4,351
|
|
|
|
4,946
|
|
|
|
6,314
|
|
|
|
2,975
|
|
|
|
4,893
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
3,530
|
|
|
|
4,012
|
|
|
|
3,600
|
|
|
|
4,662
|
|
|
|
5,239
|
|
|
|
2,305
|
|
|
|
3,507
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
7,089
|
|
|
|
7,687
|
|
|
|
7,951
|
|
|
|
9,608
|
|
|
|
11,553
|
|
|
|
5,280
|
|
|
|
8,400
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating (loss) income
|
|
|
(6,503
|
)
|
|
|
(7,228
|
)
|
|
|
(5,271
|
)
|
|
|
(9,251
|
)
|
|
|
(3,218
|
)
|
|
|
(2,804
|
)
|
|
|
3,630
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest (expense) income, net
|
|
|
(482
|
)
|
|
|
(1,102
|
)
|
|
|
(3,116
|
)
|
|
|
(4,963
|
)
|
|
|
(214
|
)
|
|
|
(213
|
)
|
|
|
12
|
|
Amortization of beneficial conversion feature of convertible debt
|
|
|
(2,194
|
)
|
|
|
(2,657
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of deferred financing costs
|
|
|
(3,560
|
)
|
|
|
(4,943
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss on extinguishment of debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,789
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income (expense), net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
174
|
|
|
|
(118
|
)
|
|
|
(32
|
)
|
|
|
246
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other (loss) income
|
|
|
(6,236
|
)
|
|
|
(8,528
|
)
|
|
|
(6,023
|
)
|
|
|
(4,995
|
)
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
(213
|
)
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
109
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income
|
|
$
|
(12,739
|
)
|
|
$
|
(15,756
|
)
|
|
$
|
(11,294
|
)
|
|
$
|
(14,246
|
)
|
|
$
|
(3,186
|
)
|
|
$
|
(3,017
|
)
|
|
$
|
3,533
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income per share (basic)
|
|
$
|
(7.29
|
)
|
|
$
|
(6.55
|
)
|
|
$
|
(3.75
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1.81
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.21
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.20
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.21
|
|
Net (loss) income per share (diluted)
|
|
$
|
(7.29
|
)
|
|
$
|
(6.55
|
)
|
|
$
|
(3.75
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1.81
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.21
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.20
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.21
|
|
Weighted average shares used in computing basic net (loss)
income per share
|
|
|
1,747
|
|
|
|
2,405
|
|
|
|
3,016
|
|
|
|
7,891
|
|
|
|
15,385
|
|
|
|
15,022
|
|
|
|
16,496
|
|
Weighted average shares used in computing diluted net (loss)
income per share
|
|
|
1,747
|
|
|
|
2,405
|
|
|
|
3,016
|
|
|
|
7,891
|
|
|
|
15,385
|
|
|
|
15,022
|
|
|
|
16,936
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31,
|
|
As of June 30,
|
|
|
2006
|
|
2007
|
|
2008
|
|
2009
|
|
2010
|
|
2010
|
|
2011
|
|
BALANCE SHEET DATA:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
2,386
|
|
|
$
|
546
|
|
|
$
|
8,012
|
|
|
$
|
987
|
|
|
$
|
6,987
|
|
|
$
|
1,374
|
|
|
$
|
12,545
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
5,429
|
|
|
|
2,816
|
|
|
|
10,622
|
|
|
|
3,393
|
|
|
|
10,573
|
|
|
|
3,041
|
|
|
|
16,798
|
|
Working capital, net(1)
|
|
|
2,197
|
|
|
|
(253
|
)
|
|
|
7,688
|
|
|
|
(225
|
)
|
|
|
5,577
|
|
|
|
(411
|
)
|
|
|
10,203
|
|
Convertible debt (current and long-term portion)
|
|
|
1,164
|
|
|
|
2,672
|
|
|
|
755
|
|
|
|
9,816
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity (deficit)
|
|
|
2,795
|
|
|
|
(1,465
|
)
|
|
|
7,454
|
|
|
|
(9,535
|
)
|
|
|
6,136
|
|
|
|
109
|
|
|
|
11,109
|
|
CASH FLOW DATA:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from operations
|
|
|
(6,362
|
)
|
|
|
(6,697
|
)
|
|
|
(5,549
|
)
|
|
|
(7,720
|
)
|
|
|
(1,592
|
)
|
|
|
(1,969
|
)
|
|
|
5,940
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities
|
|
|
(360
|
)
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
(576
|
)
|
|
|
(269
|
)
|
|
|
(527
|
)
|
|
|
(264
|
)
|
|
|
(511
|
)
|
Cash flows from financing activities
|
|
|
8,713
|
|
|
|
4,807
|
|
|
|
13,591
|
|
|
|
964
|
|
|
|
8,119
|
|
|
|
2,620
|
|
|
|
129
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Excluding current portion of convertible debt |
10
RISK
FACTORS
An investment in our common stock involves a substantial risk
of loss. You should read and carefully consider the following
risks, together with the financial and other information
contained in this prospectus, before you decide to invest in
shares of our common stock. Our business, operating results and
financial condition may be materially and adversely affected by
any of these risks. As a result, the market price of our common
stock could decline, and you could lose all or part of your
investment.
Risks
Related to our Business
We
currently depend on one customer for substantially all of our
revenue, and any material delay, reduction or cancellation of
orders from this customer would significantly reduce our revenue
and have a material negative impact on our business.
Duke Energy accounted for substantially all of our revenue for
each of our last five fiscal years and for the first six months
of our current fiscal year. Any material delay, reduction or
cancellation of orders from Duke Energy would have a material
adverse effect on our business, including significantly reduced
revenue, unabsorbed overhead and incurred net losses.
Although we have a long-term contract that stipulates the
general terms of our relationship, Duke Energy does not provide
us with firm purchase commitments for the duration of the
contract. Instead, Duke Energy provides us with
12-month
rolling order forecasts and monthly purchase orders. Duke
Energy, can delay, reduce or cancel purchase orders at any time
prior to the anticipated lead time for delivery of the products
(typically three months), subject to Duke Energys payment
of a cancellation fee not to exceed the price of the products
cancelled. Duke Energy may also delay, reduce or cancel its
purchase orders without penalty if we are unable to deliver the
products ordered thereunder within a specified time from the
scheduled delivery date.
Our immediate business opportunities continue to be primarily
dependent on the success of our deployments with Duke Energy and
the future decisions of Duke Energy relating to its smart grid
deployment in its service territories. Our goal is to increase
our business with Duke Energy and to attract new customers. We
may not achieve this goal within an acceptable period of time or
at all. The failure to increase our business with Duke Energy or
to attract new customers would have a material adverse effect on
our business and prospects.
In January 2011, Duke Energy and Progress Energy announced a
proposed merger that is subject to stockholder and regulatory
approval. Since the merger of Duke Energy and Progress Energy is
complex and each company has its own smart grid related
investment plans, we are unable to assess the effects, if any,
that the proposed merger will have on our business. We cannot
assure you that the post-merger entity will continue or expand
its business with us.
We have
never achieved profitability on an annual basis, and we may be
unable to achieve or maintain profitability in future
periods.
We have never achieved profitability on an annual basis. We
incurred net losses of $15.8 million in 2007,
$11.3 million in 2008, $14.2 million in 2009 and
$3.2 million in 2010. At December 31, 2010, we had an
accumulated deficit of $143.4 million. We had net income of
$1.1 million in the first quarter of our current fiscal
year and $2.4 million in the second quarter of our current
fiscal year. We may not, however, be able to maintain
profitability in our current or future fiscal years. To grow our
revenue and customer base, we also plan to increase spending
associated with technology and business development, thereby
increasing our operating expenses. These increased costs may
cause us to incur net losses in the foreseeable future, and we
may be unable to grow our revenue and expand our customer base
to become profitable on an annual basis.
11
We depend
on factors affecting the utility industry.
We expect to continue to derive substantially all of our revenue
from sales of products to utilities. Purchases of our products
may be deferred as a result of many factors, including economic
downturns, slowdowns in new residential and commercial
construction, access to capital at acceptable terms, utility
specific financial circumstances, mergers and acquisitions,
regulatory decisions, weather conditions and interest rates. We
may experience variability in operating results on an annual and
a quarterly basis as a result of these factors.
Utility
industry sales cycles can be lengthy and unpredictable, which
can negatively impact our ability to expand the deployment of
our products with Duke Energy and to secure new
customers.
Sales cycles for smart grid projects are generally long and
unpredictable due to budgeting, procurement and regulatory
approval processes that can take up to several years to
complete. Utility customers typically issue requests for quotes
and proposals, establish evaluation committees, review different
technical options, require pilot programs prior to commercial
deployments, analyze cost and benefit metrics, consider
regulatory factors and follow their normal budget approval
processes. In addition, many electric utilities tend to be risk
averse and tend to follow industry trends rather than be the
first to purchase new products or services. These tendencies can
extend the lead time for, or prevent acceptance of, new products
or services, including those for smart grid initiatives despite
the support of the federal government through grants and other
incentives.
Accordingly, potential customers may take longer to reach a
decision to initiate smart grid programs or to purchase our
products or services. It is not unusual for a utility customer
to go through the entire sales process and not accept any
proposal or quote. This extended sales process requires the
dedication of significant time by our personnel to develop
relationships at various levels and within various departments
of utilities and our use of significant financial resources,
with no certainty of success or recovery of our related
expenses. Long and unpredictable sales cycles with utility
customers could have a material adverse effect on our business,
operating results or our financial condition.
The
market for our products and services, and smart grid technology
generally, is still developing and we will have difficulty
expanding our business and securing new customers if the market
develops less extensively or more slowly than we
expect.
The market for our products and services, and smart grid
technology generally, is still developing, and it is uncertain
whether our products and services will achieve and sustain high
levels of demand and market acceptance. Our success will depend
to a substantial extent on the willingness and ability of
utilities to implement smart grid technology. Many utilities
lack the financial resources
and/or
technical expertise required to evaluate, deploy and operate
smart grid technology. Regulatory agencies, including public
utility commissions, govern utilities activities, and they
may not create a regulatory environment that is conducive to the
implementation of smart grid technologies in a particular
jurisdiction. Furthermore, some utilities may be reluctant or
unwilling to adopt smart grid technology because they may be
unable to develop a business case to justify the up-front and
ongoing expenditures. If utilities do not widely adopt smart
grid technologies or do so more slowly than we expect, we will
have difficulty expanding our business and securing new
customers, which will adversely affect our business and
operating results.
Because
the markets for our products are highly competitive, we may lose
sales to our competitors, which would harm our revenue and
operating results.
Competition in the smart grid market is intense and involves
rapidly changing technologies, evolving industry standards,
frequent new product introductions, changes in customer or
regulatory requirements and localized market requirements.
Competitive pressures require us to keep pace with the evolving
needs of utilities; to continue to develop and introduce new
products, features and services in a timely, efficient and
cost-effective manner; and to stay abreast of regulatory factors
affecting the utility industry.
12
We compete with a wide array of manufacturers, vendors,
strategic alliances, systems developers and other businesses,
including other smart grid communications technology companies,
ranging from relatively smaller companies focusing mainly on
communications technology to large Internet and software-based
companies. In addition, some providers of smart meters may add
communications capabilities to their existing business in the
future, which could decrease our base of potential customers and
could decrease our revenue and profitability. Early
adopters, or customers that have sought out new
technologies and services, have largely comprised the target
market for our products. Because the number of early adopters is
limited, we will need to expand our target markets by marketing
and selling our products to mainstream customers to continue our
growth.
Some of our present and potential future competitors have, or
may have, greater name recognition, experience and customer
bases as well as substantially greater financial, technical,
sales, marketing, manufacturing and other resources than we
possess and that afforded them competitive advantages. These
potential competitors may undertake more extensive marketing
campaigns, adopt more aggressive pricing policies, obtain more
favorable pricing from suppliers and manufacturers and exert
more influence on sales channels than we do. Competitors may
sell products at lower prices in order to obtain market share.
Competitors may be able to respond more quickly than we can to
new or emerging technologies and changes in customer
requirements. Competitors may also be able to devote greater
resources to the development, promotion and sale of their
products and services than we can. Competitors may introduce
products and services that are more cost-efficient, provide
superior performance or achieve greater market acceptance than
our products and services. Our competitors may make strategic
acquisitions or establish cooperative relationships among
themselves or with third parties that enhance their ability to
address the needs of our prospective customers. It is possible
that new competitors or alliances among current and new
competitors may emerge and rapidly gain significant market
share. Other companies may also drive technological innovation
and develop products that are equal or superior in quality and
performance to our products and render our products
non-competitive or obsolete.
Any of these competitive factors could make it more difficult
for us to attract and retain customers, cause us to lower our
prices in order to compete and reduce our market share and
revenue, any of which could have a material adverse effect on
our operating results and financial condition. If we fail to
compete successfully with current or future competitors, we
could experience material adverse effects on our business,
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
If we are
unable to keep pace with technological innovations and are
unable to continue to develop new products and product
enhancements, we may be unable to expand our business with Duke
Energy or secure new customers.
We operate in a new and evolving market. Technological
advances, the introduction of new products, evolving industry
standards, changing industry preferences and changes in utility
industry regulatory requirements could adversely affect our
business unless we are able to adapt to the changing conditions.
Technological advances or changing industry preferences could
render our products less desirable or obsolete, and we may not
be able to respond effectively to the requirements of evolving
market conditions. As a result, we may need to commit
significant financial and other resources to the following:
|
|
|
|
|
engaging additional engineering and other technical personnel;
|
|
|
continuing research and development activities on existing and
potential products;
|
|
|
maintaining and enhancing our technological capabilities;
|
|
|
pursuing innovative development of new products and technologies;
|
|
|
designing and developing new products and product enhancements
that appeal to customers;
|
|
|
meeting the expectations of our customers in terms of product
design, cost, performance and service;
|
|
|
responding to changing industry preferences;
|
|
|
maintaining efficient, timely and cost-effective manufacturing
resources of our products; and
|
|
|
achieving customer acceptance of our products and technologies.
|
Our future success depends on our ability to address the
changing market needs by developing and introducing new products
and product updates that compare favorably on the basis of
timely introduction, cost and performance
13
with the products of competitive suppliers and evolving
technologies. We must also extend and keep pace with
technological developments and emerging industry standards that
address the needs of customers. We intend to commit substantial
resources to developing new products, product enhancements and
technological advances for the smart grid market. The smart grid
market is relatively new, and industry standards for this market
are evolving and changing. If the smart grid market does not
develop as anticipated, or if demand for our products in this
market does not materialize or occurs more slowly than we
expect, we will have expended substantial resources and capital
without realizing sufficient revenue, which will adversely
affect our business and operating results.
Existing
and future regulations concerning the electric utility industry
may present technical, regulatory and economic barriers that may
significantly impact future demand for our products.
International, federal, state and local government regulations
and policies, as well as internal policies and regulations
promulgated by electric utilities, heavily influence the market
for the electric utility industry. These regulations and
policies often relate to investment initiatives, including
decisions relating to investment in smart grid technologies, as
well as building codes, public safety regulations and licensing
requirements. In addition, certain of our contracts with our
potential utility customers may be subject to approval by
federal, state or local regulatory agencies, which may not be
obtained or be issued on a timely basis. In the United States
and in a number of other countries, these regulations and
policies are being modified and may continue to be modified and
have a substantial impact on the market for our and other smart
grid related technologies. If such regulations or policies do
not continue to gain acceptance for smart grid initiatives or
the adoption of such initiatives takes substantially longer than
expected, our prospects for developing new customers could be
significantly limited.
Duke
Energy and some potential utility customers have applied for
government grants and may also seek to participate in other
government incentive programs, and if those grants or other
incentives are not received or are significantly delayed, our
results of operations could suffer.
Many utilities, including Duke Energy and some of our potential
utility customers, have applied for grants and may seek to
participate in other government incentive programs designed to
stimulate the U.S. economy and support environmental
initiatives, including smart grid technologies. In certain
cases, such as with the American Reinvestment and Recovery Act
of 2009, or ARRA, the U.S. government has approved the
funds, and the government and the utilities have entered into
agreements under which the government has agreed to award funds
to the utilities, but significant portions of the funds have not
yet been distributed. Duke Energy has applied for and been
granted funding under ARRA programs, which may account for a
significant portion of our current and anticipated future
revenue and billings. Duke Energy and our potential utility
customers that seek these government grants or incentives may
delay or condition the purchase of our products and services
upon receipt of such funds or upon their confidence in the
future disbursement and tax treatment of those funds. If Duke
Energy and our potential utility customers do not receive these
funds or if their receipt of funds is significantly delayed, our
operating results could suffer. Similarly, the receipt of
government funds or incentives may be conditioned upon utilities
meeting milestones and other requirements, some of which may not
be known until a future point in time. If our products and
services do not meet the requirements necessary for receipt of
government funds or other incentives, Duke Energy and our
potential utility customers may delay or condition the purchase
of our products and services until they meet these requirements,
and our results of operations could suffer. Furthermore, there
may not be government funds or incentives for utilities in
future periods. As a result, Duke Energy and our potential
utility customers may not have the resources or incentives to
purchase our products and services in those future periods.
The
adoption of industry standards applicable to our products or
services could limit our ability to compete in the
marketplace.
Standards bodies, which are formal and informal associations
that seek to establish voluntary, non-governmental product and
technology standards, are influential in the United States and
abroad. We participate in voluntary standards organizations in
order to both help promote non-proprietary, open standards for
interoperability with our products and to prevent the adoption
of exclusionary standards. However, we are not able to control
the content of adopted voluntary standards and do not have the
resources to participate in all voluntary standards processes
that
14
may affect our markets. The adoption, or expected adoption, of
voluntary standards that are incompatible with our products or
technology or that favor our competitors products or
technology could limit the market opportunity for our products
and services or render them obsolete, any of which could
materially and adversely affect our revenue, results of
operations and financial condition.
If we
become subject to product returns and product liability claims
resulting from defects in our products, we may fail to achieve
market acceptance of our products, and our business could be
harmed.
We develop complex products for use in an evolving marketplace
and generally warrant our products for a period of
12 months from the date of sale. Despite testing by us and
customers, our products may contain or may be alleged to contain
undetected errors or failures. In addition, a customer or its
installation partners may improperly install or implement our
products. The integration of our products in smart grid networks
or applications may entail the risk of product liability or
warranty claims based on disruption to these networks or
applications. Any such manufacturing errors or product defects
could result in a delay in recognition or loss of revenue, loss
of market share or failure to achieve market acceptance.
Additionally, these defects could result in financial or other
damages to a customer; cause us to incur significant warranty,
support and repair costs; and divert the attention of our
engineering personnel from our product development efforts. A
product liability claim brought against us, even if
unsuccessful, would likely be time-consuming and costly to
defend. The occurrence of these problems would likely harm our
business.
We currently maintain property, general commercial liability,
errors and omissions and other lines of insurance. Such
insurance may be insufficient in amount to cover any particular
claim, or we might not carry insurance that covers a specific
claim. In addition, such insurance may not be available in the
future or the cost of such insurance may increase substantially.
Our
ability to provide bid bonds, performance bonds or letters of
credit may be limited and could negatively affect our ability to
bid on or enter into significant long-term agreements.
We may be required to provide bid bonds or performance bonds to
secure our performance under customer contracts or, in some
cases, as a prerequisite to submit a bid on a potential project.
Our ability to obtain such bonds will depend upon our
capitalization, working capital, past performance, management
expertise and reputation, and external factors beyond our
control, including the overall capacity of the surety market.
Surety companies consider those factors in relation to the
amount of our tangible net worth and other underwriting
standards that may change from time to time. Surety companies
may require that we collateralize a percentage of the bond with
our cash or other form of credit enhancement. Events that affect
surety markets generally may result in bonding becoming more
difficult to obtain in the future, or being available only at a
significantly greater cost. In addition, utilities may require
collateral guarantees in the form of letters of credit to secure
performance or to fund possible damages as the result of an
event of default under any contracts with them. If we enter into
significant long-term agreements that require the issuance of
letters of credit, our liquidity could be negatively impacted.
Our inability to obtain adequate bonding or letters of credit
and, as a result, to bid or enter into significant long-term
agreements, could have a material adverse effect on our ability
to effectively compete and could impact our future business.
We
currently rely on a single contract manufacturer to produce our
products, and a loss of our sole contract manufacturer or its
inability to satisfy our quality and other requirements could
severely disrupt the production and supply of our
products.
We utilize one contract manufacturer for all of our production
requirements. This manufacturing is conducted in China by a
U.S.-based company that also performs services for numerous
other companies. We depend on our manufacturer to maintain high
levels of productivity and satisfactory delivery schedules. Our
reliance on our manufacturer reduces our control over the
manufacturing process, exposing us to risks, including reduced
control over quality assurance, product costs and product
supply. Any financial, operational or other difficulties
involving our manufacturer could adversely affect us. We provide
our manufacturer with up to
12-month
rolling forecasts of our production requirements. We do not,
however, have long-term agreements with our manufacturer that
15
guarantees production capacity, prices, lead times or delivery
schedules. Since our manufacturer serves other customers, a
number of which have greater production requirements than we do,
our manufacturer could determine to prioritize production
capacity for other customers or reduce or eliminate production
for us on short notice. We could also encounter lower
manufacturing productivity and longer delivery schedules in
commencing volume production of new products. Any of these
problems could result in our inability to deliver our products
in a timely manner and adversely affect our operating results.
The loss of our relationship with our manufacturer or its
inability to conduct its manufacturing services for us as
anticipated in terms of cost, quality and timeliness could
adversely affect our ability to fill customer orders in
accordance with required delivery, quality and performance
requirements. If this were to occur, the resulting decline in
revenue would harm our business.
If any one of these risks materializes, it could significantly
impact our operations and our ability to fulfill our obligations
under purchase orders with Duke Energy as well as future orders
from Duke Energy or other customers. Qualifying new
manufacturers is time consuming and might result in unforeseen
manufacturing and operational problems. If we had to transition
to an alternative contract manufacturer we could experience
operational delays, increased product costs and increased
operating costs which could irreparably harm our relationship
with Duke Energy, harm our reputation and could potentially
impact our ability to secure new customers.
Shortages
of components and materials may delay or reduce our sales and
increase our costs, thereby harming our results of
operations.
The inability of our manufacturer to obtain sufficient
quantities of components and other materials necessary for the
production of our products could result in reduced or delayed
sales or lost orders. Any delay in or loss of sales could
adversely impact our operating results. Some of the materials
used in the production of our products are available from a
limited number of foreign suppliers, particularly suppliers
located in Asia. In most cases, neither we nor our manufacturer
has long-term supply contracts with these suppliers. As a
result, we are subject to increased costs, supply interruptions
and difficulties in obtaining materials.
Security
breaches involving our smart grid products or services,
publicized breaches in smart grid products and services offered
by others or the public perception of security risks or
vulnerability created by the deployment of the smart grid in
general, whether or not valid, could harm our
business.
The security technologies we have integrated into our
communications platform and products that are designed to detect
unauthorized activity and prevent or minimize security breaches
may not function as expected and our products and services,
those of other companies with whose products our products and
services are integrated or interact, or even the products of
other smart grid solutions providers may be subject to
significant real or perceived security breaches.
Our communications platform allows utilities to monitor, compile
and analyze sensitive information related to consumers
energy usage, as well as the performance of different parts of
the electric power distribution grid. As part of our data
transfer and managed services, we may store
and/or come
into contact with sensitive consumer information and data when
we perform operational, installation or maintenance functions
for a utility customer. If, in handling this information, we,
our partners or a utility customer fails to comply with privacy
or security laws, we could face significant legal and financial
exposure to claims of government agencies, utility customers and
consumers whose privacy is compromised. Even the perception that
we, our partners or a utility customer has improperly handled
sensitive, confidential information could have a negative effect
on our business. In addition, third parties may, through
computer viruses, physical or electronic break-ins and other
means, attempt to breach our security measures or
inappropriately use or access our
AmbientNMS®
or the communications nodes we have in the field. If a breach is
successful, sensitive information may be improperly obtained,
manipulated or corrupted, and we may face legal and financial
exposure. In addition, a breach could lead to a loss of
confidence in our products and services, and our business could
suffer.
Our current and anticipated future products and services allow
authorized personnel to remotely control equipment at
residential and commercial locations, as well as at various
points on the grid. For example, our software could allow a
utility to remotely connect and disconnect electricity at
specific customer locations. If an
16
unauthorized third party were to breach our security measures
and disrupt, gain access to, or take control of, any of our
products or services, our business and reputation could be
severely harmed.
Our products and services may also be integrated or interface
with products and services sold by third parties, and rely on
the security of those products and their secure transmission of
proprietary data over the Internet and other networks. Because
we do not have control over the security measures implemented by
third parties in their products or in the transmission of data
over the Internet and other networks, we cannot ensure the
complete integrity or security of such third-party products and
transmissions.
Concerns about security or customer privacy may result in the
adoption of state or federal legislation that restricts the
implementation of smart grid technology or requires us to make
modifications to our products, which could significantly limit
the deployment of our technologies or result in significant
expense to modify our products.
Any real or perceived security breach could seriously harm our
reputation and result in significant legal and financial
exposure, inhibit market acceptance of our products and
services, halt or delay the deployment by utilities of our
products and services, cause us to lose sales, trigger
unfavorable legislation and regulatory action and inhibit the
growth of the overall market for smart grid products and
services. Any of these risks could have a material adverse
effect on our business, operating results and financial
condition.
Developments
in data protection laws and regulations may affect technology
relating to smart grid products and solutions, which could
adversely affect the demand for our products and
services.
Our products and services may be subject to data protection laws
and regulations that impose a general framework for the
collection, processing and use of personal data. Our
communications platform relies on the transfer of data relating
to individual energy use and may be affected by these laws and
regulations. It is unclear how the regulations governing the
transfer of personal data in connection with privacy
requirements will further develop in the United States and
internationally, and to what extent this may affect technology
relating to smart grid products and services. This could have a
material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and
results of operations.
We use
some open source software in our products and services that may
subject our products and services to general release or require
us to re-engineer our products and services, which may cause
harm to our business.
We use some open source software in connection with our products
and services. From time to time, companies that incorporate open
source software into their products have faced claims
challenging the ownership of open source software
and/or
compliance with open source license terms. Therefore, we could
be subject to suits by parties claiming ownership of what we
believe to be open source software or noncompliance with open
source licensing terms. Some open source software licenses
require users who distribute open source software as part of
their software to publicly disclose all or part of the source
code to such software
and/or make
available any derivative works of the open source code on
unfavorable terms or at no cost. We monitor the use of open
source software in our products and services and try to ensure
that none of the open source software is used in a manner that
would require us to disclose the source code to the related
product or that would otherwise breach the terms of an open
source agreement. However, such use could inadvertently occur
and we may be required to release our proprietary source code,
pay damages for breach of contract, re-engineer our products,
discontinue the sale of our products in the event re-engineering
cannot be accomplished on a timely basis or take other remedial
action that may divert resources away from our development
efforts, any of which could adversely affect our business,
operating results and financial condition.
17
Our
quarterly results are inherently unpredictable and subject to
substantial fluctuations, and, as a result, we may fail to meet
the expectations of securities analysts and investors, which
could adversely affect the trading price of our common
stock.
Our revenue and other operating results may vary significantly
from quarter to quarter as a result of a number of factors, many
of which are outside of our control. While our revenue has
increased in recent periods, there can be no assurances that our
revenue will continue to increase or will not decrease on a
quarterly or annual basis.
The factors that may affect the unpredictability of our
quarterly results and cause our stock price to fluctuate include
the following:
|
|
|
|
|
long, and sometimes unpredictable, sales and customer deployment
cycles;
|
|
|
changes in the mix of products and services sold;
|
|
|
our dependence on a single customer;
|
|
|
changing market conditions;
|
|
|
changes in the competitive environment;
|
|
|
failures of our products or components that we use in our
products that delay deployments, harm our reputation or result
in high warranty costs, contractual penalties or terminations;
|
|
|
product or project failures by third-party vendors, utility
customers or competitors that result in the cancellation,
slowing down or deferring of projects;
|
|
|
liquidated damage provisions in our current or future contracts,
which could result in significant penalties if triggered or,
even if not triggered, could affect our ability to recognize
revenue in a given period;
|
|
|
the ability of our suppliers and manufacturers to deliver
supplies and products to us on a timely basis;
|
|
|
delays associated with government funding programs for smart
grid projects;
|
|
|
political and consumer sentiment and the related impact on the
scope and timing of smart grid deployment; and
|
|
|
economic, regulatory and political conditions in the markets
where we operate or anticipate operating.
|
As a result, we believe that quarter to quarter comparisons of
operating results are not necessarily indicative of what our
future performance will be. In future quarters, our operating
results may be below the expectations of securities analysts or
investors, in which case the price of our common stock may
decline.
Negative
economic conditions in the United States and globally may have a
material and adverse effect on our operating results, cash flow
and financial condition.
The economies in the United States and countries around the
world have been recovering from a global financial crisis and
recession, which began in 2008, but financial markets and world
economies continue to be volatile. Significant long-term effects
will likely result from the financial crisis and recession,
including slower and more volatile future global economic growth
than during the years prior to the financial crisis of 2008. A
lower future economic growth rate could result in reductions in
sales of our products and services, slower adoption of new
technologies and an increase price competition. Any of these
events would likely harm our business, results of operations and
financial condition.
International
manufacturing and sales risks could adversely affect our
operating results.
Our products are produced in China by a U.S.-based, third-party
contract manufacturer. We may also expand our addressable market
by pursuing opportunities to sell our products in international
markets. We have had no experience operating in markets outside
of the United States. Accordingly, new markets may require us to
respond to new and unanticipated regulatory, marketing, sales
and other challenges. We may not be successful in responding to
these and other challenges that we may face as we enter and
attempt to expand in international markets. International
operations also entail a variety of other risks. The manufacture
of our products abroad and our
18
potential expansion into international markets expose us to
various economic, political and other risks that could adversely
affect our operations and operating results, including the
following:
|
|
|
|
|
potentially reduced protection for intellectual property rights;
|
|
|
political, social or economic instability in certain parts of
the world;
|
|
|
unexpected changes in legislature or regulatory requirements of
foreign countries;
|
|
|
differing labor regulations;
|
|
|
tariffs and duties and other trade barrier restrictions;
|
|
|
possible employee turnover or labor unrest;
|
|
|
the burdens and costs of compliance with a variety of foreign
laws;
|
|
|
currency exchange fluctuations;
|
|
|
potentially adverse tax consequences; and
|
|
|
potentially longer payment cycles and greater difficulty in
accounts receivable collections.
|
International operations are also subject to general
geopolitical risks, such as political, social and economic
instability and changes in diplomatic and trade relations. One
or more of these factors could adversely affect any
international operations and result in lower revenue than we
expect and could significantly affect our profitability.
Growth in
our business may be impacted if international trade is hindered,
disrupted or economically disadvantaged.
Political and economic conditions abroad may adversely affect
the foreign production of our products as well as the sale of
our products if we expand our business internationally.
Protectionist trade legislation in either the United States or
foreign countries, such as a change in the current tariff
structures, export or import compliance laws or other trade
policies, could adversely affect our ability to obtain product
production from foreign manufacturers and to sell our products
in foreign countries.
Changes in policies by the U.S. or foreign governments
resulting in, among other things, higher taxation, currency
conversion limitations, restrictions on the transfer of funds or
the expropriation of private enterprises also could have a
material adverse effect on us. Any actions by countries in which
we conduct business to reverse policies that encourage foreign
investment or foreign trade also could adversely affect our
operating results. In addition, U.S. trade policies, such
as most favored nation status and trade preferences
for certain Asian nations, could affect the attractiveness of
our services to our U.S. customers and adversely impact our
operating results.
Our
operating results could be adversely affected by fluctuations in
the value of the U.S. dollar against foreign
currencies.
We currently transact business in U.S. dollars with our
U.S.-based manufacturer that produces our products in China. A
weakening of the dollar could cause our overseas manufacturer to
require renegotiation of either the prices or currency we pay
for its services. In the future, our manufacturer and
international customers, if any, could negotiate pricing and
make or require payments in
non-U.S. currencies.
If our overseas vendors or customers require us to transact
business in
non-U.S. currencies,
fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates could affect our
cost of goods, operating expenses and operating margins and
could result in exchange losses. In addition, currency
devaluation can result in a loss to us if we hold deposits of
that currency. Hedging foreign currencies can be difficult,
especially if the currency is not freely traded. We cannot
predict the impact of future exchange rate fluctuations on our
operating results. We currently do not hedge any foreign
currencies.
19
Our
inability to protect our intellectual property could impair our
competitive advantage, reduce our revenue and increase our
costs.
Our success and ability to compete depend in part on our ability
to maintain the proprietary aspects of our technologies and
products. We rely on a combination of trade secrets, patents,
copyrights, trademarks, confidentiality agreements and other
contractual provisions to protect our intellectual property, but
these measures may provide only limited protection. We generally
enter into written confidentiality and non-disclosure agreements
with our employees, consultants, customers, manufacturers and
other recipients of our technologies and products and assignment
of invention agreements with our employees and consultants. We
may not always be able to enforce these agreements and may fail
to enter into any such agreement in every instance when
appropriate. We license from third parties certain technology
used in and for our products. These third-party licenses are
granted with restrictions; therefore, such third-party
technology may not remain available to us on terms beneficial to
us. Our failure to enforce and protect our intellectual property
rights or obtain from third parties the right to use necessary
technology could have a material adverse effect on our business,
operating results and financial condition. In addition, the laws
of some foreign countries do not protect proprietary rights as
fully as do the laws of the United States.
Patents may not issue from the patent applications that we have
filed or may file in the future. Our issued patents may be
challenged, invalidated or circumvented, and claims of our
patents may not be of sufficient scope or strength, or issued in
the proper geographic regions, to provide meaningful protection
or any commercial advantage. We have not applied for, and do not
have, any copyright registration on our technologies or
products. We have applied to register certain of our trademarks
in the United States and other countries. We cannot assure you
that we will obtain registrations of principle or other
trademarks in key markets. Failure to obtain registrations could
compromise our ability to protect fully our trademarks and
brands and could increase the risk of challenge from third
parties to our use of our trademarks and brands.
We may be
required to incur substantial expenses and divert management
attention and resources in defending intellectual property
litigation against us.
We cannot be certain that our technologies and products do not
and will not infringe issued patents or other proprietary rights
of others. While we are not currently subject to any
infringement claim, any future claim, with or without merit,
could result in significant litigation costs and diversion of
resources, including the attention of management, and could
require us to enter into royalty and licensing agreements, any
of which could have a material adverse effect on our business.
We may not be able to obtain such licenses on commercially
reasonable terms, if at all, or the terms of any offered
licenses may be unacceptable to us. If forced to cease using
such technology, we may be unable to develop or obtain alternate
technology. Accordingly, an adverse determination in a judicial
or administrative proceeding or failure to obtain necessary
licenses could prevent us from manufacturing, using or selling
certain of our products, which could have a material adverse
effect on our business, operating results, and financial
condition.
Furthermore, parties making such claims could secure a judgment
awarding substantial damages, as well as injunctive or other
equitable relief that could effectively block our ability to
make, use or sell our products in the United States or abroad.
Such a judgment could have a material adverse effect on our
business, operating results and financial condition. In
addition, we are obligated under certain agreements to indemnify
the other party in connection with infringement by us of the
proprietary rights of third parties. In the event we are
required to indemnify parties under these agreements, it could
have a material adverse effect on our business, financial
condition and results of operations.
We may
incur substantial expenses and divert management resources in
prosecuting others for their unauthorized use of our
intellectual property rights.
Other companies, including our competitors, may develop
technologies that are similar or superior to our technologies,
duplicate our technologies or design around our patents and may
have or obtain patents or other
20
proprietary rights that would prevent, limit or interfere with
our ability to make, use or sell our products. Effective
intellectual property protection may be unavailable or limited
in some foreign countries in which we may do business, such as
China. Unauthorized parties may attempt to copy or otherwise use
aspects of our technologies and products that we regard as
proprietary. Our means of protecting our proprietary rights in
the United States or abroad may not be adequate or competitors
may independently develop similar technologies. If our
intellectual property protection is insufficient to protect our
intellectual property rights, we could face increased
competition in the market for our technologies and products.
Should any of our competitors file patent applications or obtain
patents that claim inventions also claimed by us, we may choose
to participate in an interference proceeding to determine the
right to a patent for these inventions because our business
would be harmed if we fail to enforce and protect our
intellectual property rights. Even if the outcome is favorable,
this proceeding could result in substantial cost to us and
disrupt our business.
In the future, we also may need to file lawsuits to enforce our
intellectual property rights, to protect our trade secrets or to
determine the validity and scope of the proprietary rights of
others. This litigation, whether successful or unsuccessful,
could result in substantial costs and diversion of resources,
which could have a material adverse effect on our business,
financial condition and results of operations.
We depend
on key personnel who would be difficult to replace, and our
business will likely be harmed if we lose their services or
cannot hire additional qualified personnel.
Our success depends substantially on the efforts and abilities
of our senior management and key personnel. The competition for
qualified management and key personnel, especially engineers, is
intense. Although we maintain noncompetition and nondisclosure
covenants with most of our key personnel, we do not have
employment agreements with most of them. The loss of services of
one or more of our key employees or the inability to hire, train
and retain key personnel, especially engineers and technical
support personnel, could delay the development and sale of our
products, disrupt our business and interfere with our ability to
execute our business plan.
Potential
strategic alliances may not achieve their objectives, and the
failure to do so could impede our growth.
We anticipate that we will enter into strategic alliances. Among
other matters, we continually explore strategic alliances
designed to enhance or complement our technology or to work in
conjunction with our technology; to provide necessary know-how,
components or supplies; to attract additional customers; and to
develop, introduce and distribute products utilizing our
technology. Any strategic alliances may not achieve their
intended objectives, and parties to our strategic alliances may
not perform as contemplated. The failure of these alliances may
impede our ability to introduce new products and expand our
business.
Any
acquisitions that we undertake could be difficult to integrate,
disrupt our business, dilute stockholder value and harm our
operating results.
We may pursue opportunities to acquire other businesses and
technologies in order to complement our products, expand the
breadth of our business, enhance our technical capabilities or
otherwise grow our business. While we have no current definitive
agreements underway, we may acquire businesses, products or
technologies in the future. If we make any future acquisitions,
we could issue stock that would dilute existing
stockholders percentage ownership, incur substantial debt,
assume contingent liabilities or experience higher operating
expenses. We have no experience in acquiring other businesses or
technologies. Potential acquisitions also involve numerous
risks, including the following:
|
|
|
|
|
problems assimilating the purchased operations, technologies or
products;
|
|
|
unanticipated costs associated with the acquisition;
|
|
|
diversion of managements attention from our core
businesses;
|
21
|
|
|
|
|
adverse effects on existing business relationships with
suppliers and customers;
|
|
|
risks associated with new ventures with respect to which we have
little or no prior experience; and
|
|
|
potential loss of key employees of purchased organizations.
|
We cannot assure you that we would be successful in overcoming
problems encountered in connection with any acquisitions, and
our inability to do so could disrupt our operations and
adversely affect our business.
Our
compliance with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and SEC rules
concerning internal controls may be time consuming, difficult
and costly, and the failure to achieve and maintain effective
internal controls in accordance with Section 404 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act could have a material adverse effect on our
ability to produce accurate financial statements and on our
stock price.
Under SEC regulations adopted pursuant to Section 404 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, we anticipate that we will be
required to furnish a report by our management on our internal
control over financial reporting with our
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2012 that includes
a statement that our independent auditors have issued an
attestation report on managements assessment of internal
control over financial reporting. We have not previously been
required to provide an attestation report of our independent
auditors. While we have spent considerable time and effort in
documenting and testing our internal control procedures in order
to provide managements assessment of our internal control
over financial reporting, we may need to spend additional
financial and other resources improving our processes, which may
result in increased general and administrative expenses and may
shift management time and attention from revenue-generating
activities to compliance activities. Despite our efforts, we can
provide no assurance as to our independent auditors
conclusions with respect to the effectiveness of our internal
control over financial reporting. There is a risk that our
independent auditors will not be able to conclude that our
internal controls over financial reporting are effective.
If we fail to comply in a timely manner with the requirements of
Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 regarding
internal control over financial reporting or to remedy any
material weaknesses in our internal controls that we may
identify, such failure could result in material misstatements in
our financial statements, cause investors to lose confidence in
our reported financial information, limit our ability to raise
needed capital and have a negative effect on the trading price
of our common stock.
We expect
to incur increased costs as a result of our recent NASDAQ
listing, this offering and our anticipated loss of our SEC
filing status as a smaller reporting company.
We expect to incur increased legal, accounting and other
expenses as a result of our NASDAQ listing, the additional
stockholders and other consequences of this offering and our
anticipated loss of our SEC filing status as a smaller reporting
company. Our NASDAQ listing will require changes in our
corporate governance practices. We expect these rules and
regulations to increase our legal and financial compliance costs
and to make some activities more time consuming and costly. We
will incur additional costs associated with our expanded public
company reporting requirements. These new rules and regulations
may make it more difficult and more expensive for us to obtain
director and officer liability insurance, and we may be required
to accept reduced policy limits and coverage or incur
substantially higher costs to obtain our desired coverage. As a
result, it may be more difficult for us to attract and retain
qualified persons to serve on our board of directors or as
executive officers.
We may
not be able to secure additional financing on favorable terms,
or at all, to meet our future capital needs.
In the future, we may require additional capital to respond to
business opportunities, challenges, acquisitions or unforeseen
circumstances and may determine to engage in equity or debt
financings or enter into credit facilities for other reasons. We
may not be able to secure additional debt or equity financing in
a timely basis or on favorable terms, or at all. Any debt
financing obtained by us in the future could involve restrictive
covenants relating to our capital raising activities and other
financial and operational matters, which may make it more
difficult for us to obtain additional capital and to pursue
business opportunities. If we raise additional funds through
further issuances
22
of equity, convertible debt securities or other securities
convertible into equity, our existing stockholders could suffer
significant dilution in their percentage ownership of our
company, and any new equity securities we issue could have
rights, preferences and privileges senior to those of holders of
our common stock, including shares of common stock sold in this
offering. If we are unable to obtain adequate financing or
financing on terms satisfactory to us, when we require it, our
ability to continue to grow or support our business and to
respond to business challenges could be significantly limited.
Risks
Related to Our Common Stock
Our
principal stockholder will continue to be able to exert
substantial influence over us.
Vicis Capital Master Fund, or Vicis, owns approximately 84% of
the outstanding shares of our common stock. Immediately after
consummation of this offering, Vicis will beneficially own
approximately % of our outstanding
shares of common stock. Consequently, Vicis will be able to
exert substantial influence over our company and control matters
requiring approval by our stockholders, including the election
of all our directors, approving any amendments to our
certificate of incorporation, increasing our authorized capital
stock, effecting a merger or sale of our assets and determining
the number of shares available for issuance under our stock
plans. As a result of Vicis control, no change of control
of our company can occur without Vicis consent.
Vicis voting control may discourage transactions involving
a change of control of our company, including transactions in
which you as a holder of our common stock might otherwise
receive a premium for your shares over the then current market
price. Vicis is not prohibited from selling a controlling
interest in our company to a third party and may do so without
your approval and without providing for a purchase of your
shares of common stock. Accordingly, your shares of common stock
may be worth less than they would be if Vicis did not maintain
voting control over us.
If you
purchase our common stock in this offering, you will incur
immediate and substantial dilution in the book value of your
shares.
If you purchase shares of our common stock in this offering,
your interest will be diluted by the amount by which the
offering price per share exceeds our pro forma net tangible book
value per share following this offering. Net tangible book value
equals total tangible assets minus total liabilities. As of
June 30, 2011, our net tangible book value was $0.67 per
share. After giving effect to this offering and assuming an
offering price of $ , our pro forma
net tangible book value would be $
per share, or $ per share if the
underwriters exercise their over-allotment option in full. This
represents an immediate dilution of
$ per share to new investors
purchasing shares of common stock in this offering, or
$ per share if the underwriters
exercise their over-allotment option in full. The exercise of
substantial options and future equity issuances, including
future public offerings or private placements of equity
securities and any additional shares issuances in connection
with any acquisitions, could result in further dilution to
investors.
Because
there has not been an active trading market for our common
stock, the offering price in this offering may not be indicative
of the market price of our common stock after this offering,
which may decrease significantly.
Prior to this offering, there has not been an active public
market for our common stock. Our common stock was quoted on the
OTC Bulletin Board until August 3, 2011 when our
common stock was listed on the NASDAQ Capital Market. The weekly
trading volume of our common stock averaged approximately
18,425 shares per week during 2010 and approximately
14,030 shares per week during the first six months of 2011.
We cannot predict the extent to which investor interest in our
company will lead to the development of an active trading market
on the NASDAQ Capital Market or otherwise or how liquid that
market might become. The lack of an active market may reduce the
value of your shares and impair your ability to sell your shares
at the time or price at which you wish to sell them. An inactive
market may also impair our ability to raise capital by selling
our common stock and may impair our ability to acquire or invest
in other companies, products or technologies by using our common
stock as consideration.
23
The
market price of our common stock may be volatile, which could
result in substantial losses for investors.
The market price of our common stock is likely to be volatile
and could fluctuate widely in response to various factors, many
of which are beyond our control, including the following:
|
|
|
|
|
our ability to execute our business plan;
|
|
|
the gain or loss of significant orders;
|
|
|
volume and timing of customer orders;
|
|
|
actual or anticipated changes in our operating results;
|
|
|
changes in expectations relating to our products, plans and
strategic position or those of our competitors or customers;
|
|
|
market conditions and trends within the utilities industry and
the smart grid market;
|
|
|
introductions of new products of new pricing policies by us or
by our competitors;
|
|
|
the gain or loss of significant customers;
|
|
|
industry developments;
|
|
|
regulatory, legislative or other developments affecting us or
the utilities industry in general or the smart grid market in
particular;
|
|
|
economic and other external factors;
|
|
|
general global economic and political instability;
|
|
|
changes in laws or regulations affecting the utilities industry;
|
|
|
announcements of technological innovations or new products by us
or our competitors;
|
|
|
acquisitions or strategic alliances by us or by our competitors;
|
|
|
litigation involving us, the utilities industry or the smart
grid market;
|
|
|
recruitment or departure of key personnel;
|
|
|
future sales of our common stock;
|
|
|
price and volume fluctuations it the overall stock market from
time to time;
|
|
|
changes in investor perception;
|
|
|
the level and quality of any research analyst coverage of our
common stock;
|
|
|
changes in earnings estimates or investment recommendations by
securities analysts;
|
|
|
the financial guidance we may provide to the public, any changes
in such guidance or our failure to meet such guidance; and
|
|
|
trading volume of our common stock or the sale of stock by our
parent, management team or directors.
|
In addition, the securities markets have experienced extreme
price and volume fluctuations that often have been unrelated or
disproportionate to the operating performance of particular
companies. Public announcements by various companies concerning,
among other things, their performance, accounting practices or
legal problems could cause the market price of our common stock
to decline regardless of our actual operating performance.
We will
have broad discretion over the use of proceeds from this
offering and could spend or invest those proceeds in ways with
which you might not agree.
We will have broad discretion with respect to the use of the net
proceeds of this offering, and you will be relying on the
judgment of our management regarding the application of these
proceeds. We currently expect to use these proceeds for general
corporate purposes, which may include working capital and
capital expenditures.
Future
sales of common stock by Vicis or others or other dilutive
events may adversely affect the market price of our common
stock, even if our business is doing well.
Immediately after consummation of this offering, we will have
outstanding shares
of common stock outstanding. Vicis and our directors and
officers have agreed with the underwriters, subject to certain
exceptions, not to dispose of or hedge any of their common stock
or securities convertible into or exchangeable for shares of
common stock during the
180-day
period beginning on the date of this prospectus, except with the
prior written consent of Stifel, Nicolaus & Company,
Incorporated. All of our outstanding shares are freely
transferable except to
24
the extent covered by the
180-day
lock-up and
if held by affiliates such as Vicis subject to additional
restrictions as to the manner of sale and volume of shares that
may be sold in any three month period. Subject to these various
restrictions, our existing stockholders could sell any or all of
the shares of common stock owned by them from time to time for
any reason. Issuance of additional shares upon exercise of
options and warrants will further dilute your ownership in the
company.
Future sales of substantial amounts of our common stock in the
public market, or the perception that such sales could occur,
could adversely affect prevailing trading prices of our common
stock and could impair our ability to raise capital through
future offerings of equity or equity-related securities. We
cannot predict what effect, if any, future sales of our common
stock, or the availability of shares for future sales, will have
on the market price of our stock. As of August 15, 2011, we
had the following outstanding securities:
|
|
|
|
|
16,532,228 shares of common stock outstanding;
|
|
|
an aggregate of 1,174,715 shares of common stock issuable
upon the exercise of then outstanding stock options at a
weighted average exercise price of $11.18 per share;
|
|
|
an aggregate of 1,151,807 shares of common stock issuable
upon the exercise of then outstanding warrants at a weighted
average exercise price of $16.29 per share; and
|
|
|
an aggregate of 2,322,916 shares of common stock reserved
for issuance under our 2000 Equity Incentive Plan and 2002
Non-Employee Directors Stock Option Plan.
|
We do not
expect to pay any dividends for the foreseeable
future.
We have never declared or paid cash dividends on our common
stock, and we do not anticipate doing so in the foreseeable
future. We currently intend to return future earnings, if any,
to fund our operations and support our growth strategies.
Accordingly, you may have to sell some or all of your common
stock in order to generate cash flow from your investment. You
may not receive a gain on your investment when you sell our
common stock and may lose some or all of the amount of your
investment. Any determination to pay dividends in the future
will be made at the discretion of our board of directors and
will depend on our results of operations, financial conditions,
contractual restrictions, restrictions imposed by applicable
law, capital requirements and other factors our board of
directors deems relevant.
Our
ability to use U.S. net operating loss carryforwards might be
limited, subjecting our corporate income to earlier
taxation.
At December 31, 2010, we had available approximately
$77 million of net operating loss carryforwards, for
U.S. income tax purposes which expire in the years 2016
through 2029. However, due to changes in stock ownership
resulting from historical investments provided by Vicis, we
expect that the use of the U.S. net operating loss
carryforwards are significantly limited under Section 382
of the Internal Revenue Code. As such, we estimate that
$61 million or more of our net operating loss carryforwards
will expire and will not be available to use against future tax
liabilities. In addition, our ability to utilize the current net
operating loss carryforwards might be further limited by the
issuance of common stock in this offering. To the extent our use
of net operating loss carryforwards is significantly limited,
our income could be subject to corporate income tax earlier than
it would if we were able to use net operating loss
carryforwards, which could result in lower profits.
25
SPECIAL
NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
Certain statements included in this prospectus are
forward-looking statements within the meaning of
Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended,
which we refer to as the Securities Act. Such forward-looking
statements are contained principally in the sections entitled
Prospectus Summary, Risk Factors,
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations and Our
Business. In some cases, you can identify forward-looking
statements by terms such as may, might,
will, objective, intend,
should, could, can,
would, expect, believe,
estimate, predict, project,
potential, plan, continue,
anticipate, appear or the negative of
these terms, and similar expressions intended to identify
forward-looking statements. These statements reflect our current
views with respect to future events and are based on assumptions
and subject to risks and uncertainties. Given these
uncertainties, you should not place undue reliance on these
forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements include,
but are not limited to, statements about:
|
|
|
|
|
our ability to retain and attract customers, particularly in
light of our dependence on a single customer for substantially
all of our revenue;
|
|
|
our expectations regarding our expenses and revenue, including
our expectations that our research and development expenses and
selling, general and administrative expenses may increase in
absolute dollars;
|
|
|
anticipated trends and challenges in our business and the
markets in which we operate, including the market for smart grid
technologies;
|
|
|
our expectations regarding competition as more and larger
companies enter our markets and as existing competitors improve
or expand their product offerings;
|
|
|
our plans for future products and enhancements of existing
products;
|
|
|
our anticipated cash needs and our estimates regarding our
capital requirements; and
|
|
|
our anticipated growth strategies.
|
These statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties
and other factors that may cause our actual results, performance
or achievements to be materially different from any future
results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by the
forward-looking statements. We discuss many of these risks in
this prospectus in greater detail under the heading Risk
Factors.
These forward-looking statements represent our estimates and
assumptions only as of the date of this prospectus. Unless
required by U.S. federal securities laws, we do not intend
to update any of these forward-looking statements to reflect
circumstances or events that occur after the statement is made.
You should read this prospectus and the documents that we
reference in this prospectus and have filed as exhibits to the
registration statement, of which this prospectus is a part,
completely and with the understanding that our actual future
results may be materially different from what we expect. We
qualify all of our forward-looking statements by these
cautionary statements.
USE OF
PROCEEDS
We estimate that we will receive net proceeds from this
offering, after deducting the underwriting discount and
estimated offering expenses payable by us, of approximately
$ million (or approximately
$ million, if the
underwriters exercise their over-allotment option in full). A
$1.00 increase (decrease) in the assumed public offering price
of $ per share would increase
(decrease) the net proceeds to us from this offering by
$ million, assuming the
number of shares offered by us, as set forth on the cover of
this prospectus, remains the same, after deducting the
underwriting discount and estimated offering expenses payable by
us.
We intend to use the net proceeds from this offering for general
corporate purposes, which may include working capital and
capital expenditures. If the opportunity arises, we may use a
portion of the net proceeds from this offering to acquire or
invest in businesses, products or technologies that are
complementary to our own, although we have no commitments with
respect to any such acquisition or investment at this time.
26
Pending the use of proceeds from this offering, we intend to
invest the net proceeds in short-term, interest-bearing,
investment-grade securities. We will have broad discretion in
the application of the net proceeds from this offering, and
investors will be relying on our judgment regarding the
application of the proceeds.
PRICE
RANGE OF COMMON STOCK
Our common stock has been listed on the NASDAQ Capital Market
under the symbol AMBT since August 3, 2011.
Prior to August 3, 2011, our common stock was quoted on the
OTC Bulletin Board under the symbol ABTG.
Although trading in our common stock has occurred on a
relatively consistent basis, the volume of shares traded has
been sporadic. There can be no assurance that an established
trading market will develop, that the current market will be
maintained or that a liquid market for our common stock will be
available in the future. Investors should not rely on historical
stock price performance as an indication of future stock price
performance.
The following table shows the quarterly high and low bid prices
or sales prices for our common stock over the last two completed
fiscal years and subsequent interim periods, as quoted on the
OTC Bulletin Board (prior to August 3, 2011) and as
reported on the NASDAQ Capital Market (beginning on
August 3, 2011). In the case of OTC Bulletin Board quotes,
the prices represent quotations by dealers without adjustments
for retail
mark-ups,
mark-downs or commissions and may not represent actual
transactions. The last reported sale price of our common stock
on August 18, 2011 was $8.20 per share.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Low
|
|
High
|
|
Year Ending December 31, 2011:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Third Quarter (through August 18, 2011)
|
|
$
|
7.00
|
|
|
$
|
13.98
|
|
Second Quarter
|
|
|
7.00
|
|
|
|
9.50
|
|
First Quarter
|
|
|
7.60
|
|
|
|
11.90
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fourth Quarter
|
|
|
8.00
|
|
|
|
15.30
|
|
Third Quarter
|
|
|
6.00
|
|
|
|
10.40
|
|
Second Quarter
|
|
|
6.20
|
|
|
|
10.70
|
|
First Quarter
|
|
|
10.10
|
|
|
|
20.00
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fourth Quarter
|
|
|
11.00
|
|
|
|
26.00
|
|
Third Quarter
|
|
|
13.60
|
|
|
|
18.60
|
|
Second Quarter
|
|
|
9.00
|
|
|
|
21.80
|
|
First Quarter
|
|
|
1.90
|
|
|
|
11.50
|
|
As of August 15, 2011, there were 137 holders of record of
our common stock. Other than our shares held by Vicis, a
significant number of shares of our common stock are held in
either nominee name or street name brokerage accounts, and
consequently, we are unable to determine the number of
beneficial owners of our stock.
DIVIDEND
POLICY
We have paid no dividends on our common stock and do not expect
to pay cash dividends in the foreseeable future. We plan to
retain all earnings to provide funds for the growth of our
company. In the future, our board of directors will decide
whether to declare and pay dividends based upon our earnings,
financial condition, capital requirements and other factors that
our board of directors may consider relevant. We are not under
any contractual restriction as to present or future ability to
pay dividends.
27
CAPITALIZATION
The following table sets forth our cash and cash equivalents and
capitalization as of June 30, 2011:
|
|
|
|
|
on an actual basis; and
|
|
|
on an as adjusted basis to reflect the sale
of shares
in this offering at an assumed public offering price of
$ per share, which was the
last reported sales price of our common stock
on ,
2011, after deducting the underwriting discount and estimated
offering expenses payable by us.
|
The information below is illustrative only, and our
capitalization following the completion of this offering will be
adjusted based on the actual public offering price and other
terms of this offering determined at pricing. You should read
this table together with Managements Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
and our consolidated financial statements and the related notes
appearing elsewhere in this prospectus.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of June 30, 2011
|
|
|
|
Actual
|
|
|
As Adjusted(1)
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except share and par value data)
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
12,545
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total long-term debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $0.001 par value, 100,000,000 shares
authorized, 16,532,228 shares issued and 16,522,228
outstanding,
actual; shares
issued
and outstanding,
as adjusted
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
151,190
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated deficit
|
|
|
(139,897
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Treasury stock; 10,000 shares at cost
|
|
|
(200
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
|
11,109
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total capitalization
|
|
$
|
11,109
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
A $1.00 increase (decrease) in the assumed public offering price
of $ per share would increase
(decrease) each of cash and cash equivalents, total
stockholders equity and total capitalization by
$ million, after deducting
the underwriting discount and estimated offering expenses
payable by us. |
28
DILUTION
If you invest in our common stock in this offering, your
interest will be diluted to the extent of the difference between
the public offering price per share of our common stock and the
pro forma net tangible book value per share of our common stock
after this offering. As of June 30, 2011, our net tangible
book value was approximately $11.1 million, or $0.67 per
share of common stock. Our net tangible book value per share
represents the amount of our total tangible assets reduced by
the amount of our total liabilities and divided by the total
number of 16,522,228 shares of our common stock outstanding
as of June 30, 2011. After giving effect to our sale in
this offering of shares of our common stock at the public
offering price of $ per share,
after deducting the underwriting discount and estimated offering
expenses payable by us, our pro forma net tangible book value as
of June 30, 2011 would have been approximately
$ million, or
$ per share of our common stock.
This amount represents an immediate increase in net tangible
book value of $ per share to our
existing stockholders and an immediate dilution of
$ per share to new investors
purchasing shares of common stock in this offering. The
following table illustrates this per share dilution:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assumed public offering price per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Net tangible book value per share as of June 30, 2011,
before giving effect to this offering
|
|
$
|
0.67
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase in net tangible book value per share attributable to
new investors in this offering
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma net tangible book value per share after giving effect
to this offering
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dilution per share to new investors in this offering
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A $1.00 increase (decrease) in the assumed public offering price
of $ per share would increase
(decrease) the pro forma net tangible book value, as adjusted to
give effect to this offering, by $
per share and the dilution to new investors by
$ per share, assuming the number
of shares offered, as set forth on the cover of this prospectus,
remains the same and after deducting the underwriting discount
and estimated offering expenses payable by us. Similarly, each
increase (decrease) of one million shares in the number of
shares of common stock offered by us would increase (decrease)
the pro forma net tangible book value, as adjusted to give
effect to this offering, by $ per
share and the dilution to new investors by
$ per share, assuming the assumed
public offering price remains the same and after deducting the
underwriting discount and estimated offering expenses payable by
us.
The following table sets forth, on the pro forma basis described
above, at June 30, 2011, the difference between the number
of shares of common stock purchased, the total consideration
paid and the average price per share paid by the existing
stockholders and by new investors in this offering at an assumed
public offering price of $ per
share, before deducting the underwriting discount and estimated
offering expenses payable by us.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
Shares Purchased
|
|
|
Total Consideration
|
|
|
Price per
|
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
Share
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Existing stockholders
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
$
|
|
|
New investors
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The above discussion and tables also assume no exercise of any
outstanding stock options or warrants. As of June 30, 2011,
there were
|
|
|
|
|
an aggregate of 1,141,465 shares issuable upon the exercise
of then outstanding options at a weighted average exercise price
of $11.20 per share; and
|
|
|
an aggregate of 1,161,807 shares issuable upon the exercise
of then outstanding warrants at a weighted average exercise
price of $16.18 per share.
|
If the underwriters exercise their over-allotment option in
full, the pro forma net tangible book value, as adjusted to give
effect to this offering would be $
per share, and the dilution to investors would be
$ per share.
29
SELECTED
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL DATA
The following consolidated financial data should be read
together with our consolidated financial statements and related
notes and Managements Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations appearing
elsewhere in this prospectus. We have derived the following
consolidated statement of operations data and cash flow data for
the years ended December 31, 2008, 2009 and 2010 and
consolidated balance sheet data as of December 31, 2009 and
2010 from our audited consolidated financial statements included
elsewhere in this prospectus. We have derived the following
consolidated statement of operations data and cash flow data for
the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2007 and consolidated
balance sheet data as of December 31, 2006, 2007 and 2008
from our audited financial statements which are not included in
this prospectus. We have derived the following consolidated
statement of operations data and cash flow data for the six
months ended June 30, 2010 and 2011 and the consolidated
balance sheet data as of June 30, 2011 from our unaudited
consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this
prospectus. We have derived the consolidated balance sheet data
as of June 30, 2010 from our unaudited consolidated
financial statements which are not included in this prospectus.
The unaudited consolidated financial statements include, in our
opinion, all adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring
adjustments that we consider necessary for the fair presentation
of the financial information set forth in those statements.
Share and per share information have been adjusted to reflect
the
1-for-100
reverse stock split of our common stock that became effective on
July 18, 2011. Our historical results are not necessarily
indicative of our results to be expected for the remainder of
2011 or in any future period.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS DATA:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue
|
|
$
|
2,337
|
|
|
$
|
2,265
|
|
|
$
|
12,622
|
|
|
$
|
2,193
|
|
|
$
|
20,358
|
|
|
$
|
6,258
|
|
|
$
|
27,993
|
|
Cost of goods sold
|
|
|
1,751
|
|
|
|
1,806
|
|
|
|
9,942
|
|
|
|
1,836
|
|
|
|
12,023
|
|
|
|
3,782
|
|
|
|
15,963
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
586
|
|
|
|
459
|
|
|
|
2,680
|
|
|
|
357
|
|
|
|
8,335
|
|
|
|
2,476
|
|
|
|
12,030
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research and development expenses
|
|
|
3,559
|
|
|
|
3,675
|
|
|
|
4,351
|
|
|
|
4,946
|
|
|
|
6,314
|
|
|
|
2,975
|
|
|
|
4,893
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
3,530
|
|
|
|
4,012
|
|
|
|
3,600
|
|
|
|
4,662
|
|
|
|
5,239
|
|
|
|
2,305
|
|
|
|
3,507
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
7,089
|
|
|
|
7,687
|
|
|
|
7,951
|
|
|
|
9,608
|
|
|
|
11,553
|
|
|
|
5,280
|
|
|
|
8,400
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating (loss) income
|
|
|
(6,503
|
)
|
|
|
(7,228
|
)
|
|
|
(5,271
|
)
|
|
|
(9,251
|
)
|
|
|
(3,218
|
)
|
|
|
(2,804
|
)
|
|
|
3,630
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest (expense) income, net
|
|
|
(482
|
)
|
|
|
(1,102
|
)
|
|
|
(3,116
|
)
|
|
|
(4,963
|
)
|
|
|
(214
|
)
|
|
|
(213
|
)
|
|
|
12
|
|
Amortization of beneficial conversion feature of convertible debt
|
|
|
(2,194
|
)
|
|
|
(2,657
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of deferred financing costs
|
|
|
(3,560
|
)
|
|
|
(4,943
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss on extinguishment of debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,789
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income (expense), net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
174
|
|
|
|
(118
|
)
|
|
|
(32
|
)
|
|
|
246
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other (loss) income
|
|
|
(6,236
|
)
|
|
|
(8,528
|
)
|
|
|
(6,023
|
)
|
|
|
(4,995
|
)
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
(213
|
)
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
109
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income
|
|
$
|
(12,739
|
)
|
|
$
|
(15,756
|
)
|
|
$
|
(11,294
|
)
|
|
$
|
(14,246
|
)
|
|
$
|
(3,186
|
)
|
|
$
|
(3,017
|
)
|
|
$
|
3,533
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income per share (basic)
|
|
$
|
(7.29
|
)
|
|
$
|
(6.55
|
)
|
|
$
|
(3.75
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1.81
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.21
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.20
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.21
|
|
Net (loss) income per share (diluted)
|
|
$
|
(7.29
|
)
|
|
$
|
(6.55
|
)
|
|
$
|
(3.75
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1.81
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.21
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.20
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.21
|
|
Weighted average shares used in computing basic net (loss)
income per share
|
|
|
1,747
|
|
|
|
2,405
|
|
|
|
3,016
|
|
|
|
7,891
|
|
|
|
15,385
|
|
|
|
15,022
|
|
|
|
16,496
|
|
Weighted average shares used in computing diluted net (loss)
income per share
|
|
|
1,747
|
|
|
|
2,405
|
|
|
|
3,016
|
|
|
|
7,891
|
|
|
|
15,385
|
|
|
|
15,022
|
|
|
|
16,936
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31,
|
|
As of June 30,
|
|
|
2006
|
|
2007
|
|
2008
|
|
2009
|
|
2010
|
|
2010
|
|
2011
|
|
BALANCE SHEET DATA:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
2,386
|
|
|
$
|
546
|
|
|
$
|
8,012
|
|
|
$
|
987
|
|
|
$
|
6,987
|
|
|
$
|
1,374
|
|
|
$
|
12,545
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
5,429
|
|
|
|
2,816
|
|
|
|
10,622
|
|
|
|
3,393
|
|
|
|
10,573
|
|
|
|
3,041
|
|
|
|
16,798
|
|
Working capital, net(1)
|
|
|
2,197
|
|
|
|
(253
|
)
|
|
|
7,688
|
|
|
|
(225
|
)
|
|
|
5,577
|
|
|
|
(411
|
)
|
|
|
10,203
|
|
Convertible debt (current and long-term portion)
|
|
|
1,164
|
|
|
|
2,672
|
|
|
|
755
|
|
|
|
9,816
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity (deficit)
|
|
|
2,795
|
|
|
|
(1,465
|
)
|
|
|
7,454
|
|
|
|
(9,535
|
)
|
|
|
6,136
|
|
|
|
109
|
|
|
|
11,109
|
|
CASH FLOW DATA:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from operations
|
|
|
(6,362
|
)
|
|
|
(6,697
|
)
|
|
|
(5,549
|
)
|
|
|
(7,720
|
)
|
|
|
(1,592
|
)
|
|
|
(1,969
|
)
|
|
|
5,940
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities
|
|
|
(360
|
)
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
(576
|
)
|
|
|
(269
|
)
|
|
|
(527
|
)
|
|
|
(264
|
)
|
|
|
(511
|
)
|
Cash flows from financing activities
|
|
|
8,713
|
|
|
|
4,807
|
|
|
|
13,591
|
|
|
|
964
|
|
|
|
8,119
|
|
|
|
2,620
|
|
|
|
129
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Excluding current portion of convertible debt |
31
MANAGEMENTS
DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
You should read the following discussion in conjunction with
our consolidated financial statements and the notes related to
those statements. Some of our discussion is forward-looking and
involves risks and uncertainties. For more information regarding
risk factors that could have a material adverse effect on our
business, refer to the Risk Factors section of this
prospectus. For a general overview of our business, refer to the
Our Business section of this prospectus.
Overview
We are a leading provider of a smart grid communications
platform that enables utilities to effectively deploy, integrate
and communicate with multiple smart grid applications within the
electric power grid. Our smart grid communications platform
significantly improves the ability of utilities to use advanced
technologies to upgrade their electric power grids, effectively
making the grids more intelligent.
Company
History
We were incorporated in 1996 in the state of Delaware. Through
the third quarter of 2008, we were a development stage company.
We are focused on the development of a communications platform
that meets the needs of utilities, including specifically for
the implementation of smart grid applications.
Duke
Energy Relationship
Since 2005, we have been a key strategic partner of Duke Energy
and we believe the leading supplier of its smart grid
communications technology in connection with its smart grid
implementation. With what we believe is one of the most
forward-looking smart grid initiatives in North America, Duke
Energy has announced plans to invest $1 billion over the
next five years in smart grid equipment for its service
territories, including Ohio, Indiana, Kentucky and the
Carolinas. Specifically, Duke Energys smart grid
deployment includes digital and automated technology, such as
communications nodes, smart meters and automated power delivery
equipment.
Duke Energy is actively deploying our communications nodes and
is licensing our
AmbientNMS®
for its deployment in Ohio. We believe that we are the
predominant provider of communications nodes and network
management system software for Duke Energys Ohio
deployment.
We believe that we have demonstrated that our technology is
secure, two-way, flexible, open, scalable, reliable and
cost-effective through the total deployment of approximately
55,000 communications nodes in the field with Duke Energy, and
we believe that Duke Energy will continue to predominantly use
our communications platform for the remainder of its Ohio smart
grid deployment. Furthermore, Duke Energys pilot
deployment of approximately 3,000 communications nodes in the
Carolinas predominantly uses our communications platform as
well. Throughout the past five years, we have worked with Duke
Energy to develop our communications platform, which has enabled
Duke Energys ability to rapidly deploy its smart grid
initiatives. Duke Energy has accelerated its historical
deployment rates and is presently deploying approximately 6,000
of our communications nodes each month.
We believe that we have a substantial opportunity to grow our
business with Duke Energy. In January 2011, Duke Energy and
Progress Energy announced a proposed merger that is subject to
stockholder and regulatory approval. Together, Duke Energy and
Progress Energy have committed to spend a combined
$1.5 billion in smart grid initiatives, partially funded by
approximately $400 million in total grants awarded to them
in 2010 under the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of
2009, or ARRA, and required to be spent by 2013. In addition to
the 130,000 communications nodes scheduled for deployment in
Ohio, we estimate that Duke Energy would require over 670,000
communications nodes if it implements a full deployment of smart
grid communications nodes in
32
Indiana, Kentucky and the Carolinas. According to Duke Energy,
it is currently working through the planning process to finalize
full-scale deployment plans in Kentucky and the Carolinas and
has filed with the North Carolina Public Utilities Commission
for the required approvals. Duke Energy is using information
from its North Carolina pilot programs and its Ohio
deployment to enhance its customer experience in its other
service territories. We believe that substantially all
communications nodes deployed by Duke Energy to date are our
communications nodes. If Duke Energy and Progress Energy
complete their proposed merger and the combined company adopts
Duke Energys deployment strategy relating to smart grid
initiatives, we estimate a potential deployment of 620,000
additional communications nodes in Progress Energys
territories in Florida and the Carolinas.
Revenue
History
We have grown total revenue from $2.2 million in 2009 to
$20.4 million in 2010 and to $28.0 million for the
six-month period ended June 30, 2011 due to increased sales
of our communications nodes to Duke Energy. Our total revenue of
$2.2 million in 2009 declined from $12.6 million in
2008 due mainly to the impact of the introduction of the ARRA.
Although the ARRA was passed in September 2009, by late 2008 and
early 2009, there was widespread speculation that a significant
amount of funding would be made available for smart grid related
initiatives. As a result, many utilities with smart grid
projects underway, including Duke Energy, substantially slowed
their spending until there was further clarity regarding the
amount of funding available under the federal program.
Furthermore, the language of the Smart Grid Investment Grants,
which are part of the ARRA, also provided initial guidance
regarding certain technical criteria required for grant
eligibility. As such, utilities needed further clarity that the
technology in their smart grid programs would qualify for
funding. As soon as the ARRA was passed in September 2009, sales
of our communications nodes to Duke Energy increased
significantly as Duke Energy resumed its smart grid
implementation in Ohio. Correspondingly, our total revenue
realized for the end of 2009 also began to increase. This
phenomenon impacted revenue trends across the entire smart grid
sector.
Backlog
We define our backlog as products that we are obligated to
deliver based on firm commitments relating to purchase orders
received from customers, currently solely Duke Energy. As of
June 30, 2011, we had backlog of approximately
$68 million, consisting of products that we expect to
deliver into 2012.
Capitalization
History
Since inception, we have primarily funded our operations with
proceeds from the sale of our securities and with revenue from
the sale of our products. Until the third quarter of 2008, we
were a development stage company focused on developing and
piloting our technology with utilities. Since 1998, we have
raised a total of $69.5 million in gross proceeds from
financing transactions to fund our operations and development
efforts. Of the $69.5 million in total gross proceeds
raised to date, approximately $4.2 million was raised from
our initial public offering of our common stock in 1998,
approximately $33.8 million in gross proceeds from the sale
of shares of our common stock and the issuance of convertible
debt from 2000 to 2006 and approximately $31.5 million in
gross proceeds from the sale of shares of our common stock and
the issuance of convertible debt to Vicis Capital Master Fund,
or Vicis, from 2007 to 2010. As of December 31, 2010, all
convertible debt had converted into common stock. Vicis is
currently our largest stockholder, owning approximately 84% of
our outstanding common stock before taking into account the
effect of this offering.
Critical
Accounting Policies and Use of Estimates
The discussion and analysis of our financial condition and
results of operations are based upon our consolidated financial
statements, which have been prepared in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles in the United States.
The preparation of these financial statements requires
management to make estimates and judgments that affect the
reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses,
and related disclosure of contingent
33
assets and liabilities. On an on-going basis, we evaluate our
estimates, including those related to revenue recognition, bad
debts, investments, intangible assets and income taxes. Our
estimates are based on historical experience and on various
other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the
circumstances. Actual results may differ from these estimates.
We have identified the accounting policies below as critical to
our business operations and the understanding of our results of
operations.
Revenue Recognition. Hardware sales consist of smart
grid communications nodes as well as system software embedded in
the communications nodes. The system software embedded in our
communications nodes is used solely in connection with the
operation of the products. Upon the sale and shipment of our
products, we are not required to update the embedded software
for newer versions that are subsequently developed. In addition,
we do not offer or provide any free post-contract customer
support. There is an original warranty period, which may run for
a period of up to 12 months from the sale of the products,
in which we may repair or replace products when and if
appropriate. As such, we recognize revenue from the sales of our
products upon delivery to the customer.
Our proprietary software consists of
AmbientNMS®,
which may be sold on a stand-alone basis. The sale or license of
AmbientNMS®
does not include post-contract customer support unless the
customer enters into a maintenance agreement with us. As a
result, we recognize revenue from the sale of this software
product when shipped. We classify amounts billed to customers
before software is shipped as deferred revenue.
We offer maintenance service, on a fee basis, that entitles the
purchasers of our products and
AmbientNMS®
software to benefits including telephone support, updates and
upgrades to our products. We amortize such revenue when received
over the appropriate period based on the terms of individual
agreements and contracts.
Inventory Valuation. We value inventory at the lower
of cost or market determined on a
first-in,
first-out basis. Certain factors may impact the net realizable
value of our inventory, including technological changes, market
demand, new product introductions and significant changes to our
cost structure. We make estimates of reserves for obsolescence
based on the current product mix on hand and its expected net
realizable value. If actual market conditions are less favorable
or other factors arise that are significantly different than
those anticipated by us, additional inventory write-downs or
increases in obsolescence reserves may be required. We consider
lower of cost or market adjustments and inventory reserves as an
adjustment to the cost basis of the underlying inventory.
Accordingly, we do not record favorable changes in market
conditions to inventory in subsequent periods.
Software Development Costs. We have historically
expensed costs incurred in the research and development of new
software products and enhancements to existing software products
as incurred. After we establish technological feasibility, we
capitalize additional development costs. No software development
costs have been capitalized as of December 31, 2009 or 2010.
Stock-Based Compensation. We account for stock-based
compensation in accordance with accounting guidance now codified
as Financial Accounting Standards Board, or FASB, Accounting
Standards Codification, or ASC, 718,
Compensation Stock Compensation (formerly
known as SFAS No. 123(R)). Under the fair value
recognition provision of ASC 718, stock-based compensation
cost is estimated at the grant date based on the fair value of
the award. We estimate the fair value of stock options granted
using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. Key input
assumptions used to estimate the fair value of stock options
include the exercise price of the award, the expected option
term, the expected volatility of our stock over the
options expected term, the risk-free interest rate over
the stock options expected term and the annual dividend
yield.
Deferred Income Taxes. We recognize deferred income
taxes for the tax consequences of temporary
differences by applying enacted statutory rates applicable
to future years to differences between the financial statement
carrying amounts and the tax basis of existing assets and
liabilities. At December 31, 2010, our deferred income tax
assets consisted primarily of net operating loss carryforwards
and stock-based compensation charges that have been fully offset
with a valuation allowance due to the uncertainty that a tax
benefit will be realized from the assets in the
34
future. At December 31, 2010, we had available
approximately $77 million of net operating loss
carryforwards, for U.S. income tax purposes which expire in
the years 2016 through 2029. However, due to changes in stock
ownership resulting from historical investments provided by
Vicis, we expect that the use of the U.S. net operating
loss carryforwards are significantly limited under
Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code. As such, we
estimate that $61 million or more of our net operating loss
carryforwards will expire and will not be available to use
against future tax liabilities.
Warranties. We account for our warranties under the
FASB ASC 450, Contingencies. We generally
warrant that our products will be free from defects in material
and workmanship for a period of one year from the date of
initial acceptance by our customers. The warranty does not cover
any losses or damage that occur as a result of improper
installation, misuse or neglect or repair or modification by
anyone other than us or our authorized repair agent. Our policy
is to accrue anticipated warranty costs based upon historical
percentages of items returned for repair within one year of the
initial sale. Because the repair rate of products under warranty
has been minimal, we have not established an historical
percentage; therefore, we have not provided for any warranty
liability reserves. We continue to monitor the rate of actual
product returns each quarter to determine whether a provision
for such warranty liability is required.
Our software license agreements generally include provisions for
indemnifying customers against liabilities if our software
infringes upon a third partys intellectual property
rights. We have not provided for any reserves for such warranty
liabilities. Our software license agreements also generally
include a warranty that our software will substantially operate
as described in the applicable program documentation. We also
warrant that we will perform services in a manner consistent
with industry standards. To date, we have not incurred any
material costs associated with these product and service
performance warranties, and as such we have not provided for any
reserves for any such warranty liabilities in our operating
results.
35
Results
of Operations
The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, our
results of operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
Total revenue
|
|
$
|
12,622
|
|
|
$
|
2,193
|
|
|
$
|
20,358
|
|
|
$
|
6,258
|
|
|
$
|
27,993
|
|
Cost of goods sold
|
|
|
9,942
|
|
|
|
1,836
|
|
|
|
12,023
|
|
|
|
3,782
|
|
|
|
15,963
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
2,680
|
|
|
|
357
|
|
|
|
8,335
|
|
|
|
2,476
|
|
|
|
12,030
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research and development expenses
|
|
|
4,351
|
|
|
|
4,946
|
|
|
|
6,314
|
|
|
|
2,975
|
|
|
|
4,893
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
3,600
|
|
|
|
4,662
|
|
|
|
5,239
|
|
|
|
2,305
|
|
|
|
3,507
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
7,951
|
|
|
|
9,608
|
|
|
|
11,553
|
|
|
|
5,280
|
|
|
|
8,400
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating (loss) income
|
|
|
(5,271
|
)
|
|
|
(9,251
|
)
|
|
|
(3,218
|
)
|
|
|
(2,804
|
)
|
|
|
3,630
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest (expense) income, net
|
|
|
(3,116
|
)
|
|
|
(4,963
|
)
|
|
|
(214
|
)
|
|
|
(213
|
)
|
|
|
12
|
|
Loss on extinguishment of debt
|
|
|
(2,789
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other (expense) income, net
|
|
|
(118
|
)
|
|
|
(32
|
)
|
|
|
246
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other (loss) income
|
|
|
(6,023
|
)
|
|
|
(4,995
|
)
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
(213
|
)
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
109
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income
|
|
$
|
(11,294
|
)
|
|
$
|
(14,246
|
)
|
|
$
|
(3,186
|
)
|
|
$
|
(3,017
|
)
|
|
$
|
3,533
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income per share (basic)
|
|
$
|
(3.75
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1.81
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.21
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.20
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.21
|
|
Net (loss) income per share (diluted)
|
|
$
|
(3.75
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1.81
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.21
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.20
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.21
|
|
Weighted average shares used in computing basic net (loss)
income per share
|
|
|
3,016
|
|
|
|
7,891
|
|
|
|
15,385
|
|
|
|
15,022
|
|
|
|
16,496
|
|
Weighted average shares used in computing diluted net (loss)
income per share
|
|
|
3,016
|
|
|
|
7,891
|
|
|
|
15,385
|
|
|
|
15,022
|
|
|
|
16,936
|
|
36
The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, our
results of operations expressed as a percentage of total revenue:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
Total revenue
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
Cost of goods sold
|
|
|
79
|
%
|
|
|
84
|
%
|
|
|
59
|
%
|
|
|
60
|
%
|
|
|
57
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
21
|
%
|
|
|
16
|
%
|
|
|
41
|
%
|
|
|
40
|
%
|
|
|
43
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research and development expenses
|
|
|
34
|
%
|
|
|
226
|
%
|
|
|
31
|
%
|
|
|
48
|
%
|
|
|
17
|
%
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
29
|
%
|
|
|
213
|
%
|
|
|
26
|
%
|
|
|
37
|
%
|
|
|
13
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
63
|
%
|
|
|
438
|
%
|
|
|
57
|
%
|
|
|
85
|
%
|
|
|
30
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating (loss) income
|
|
|
(42
|
)%
|
|
|
(422
|
)%
|
|
|
(16
|
)%
|
|
|
(45
|
)%
|
|
|
13
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest (expense) income, net
|
|
|
(25
|
)%
|
|
|
(226
|
)%
|
|
|
(1
|
)%
|
|
|
(3
|
)%
|
|
|
0
|
%
|
Loss on extinguishment of debt
|
|
|
(22
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other (expense) income, net
|
|
|
(1
|
)%
|
|
|
(2
|
)%
|
|
|
1
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other (loss) income
|
|
|
(48
|
)%
|
|
|
(228
|
)%
|
|
|
0
|
%
|
|
|
(3
|
)%
|
|
|
0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income
|
|
|
(90
|
)%
|
|
|
(650
|
)%
|
|
|
(16
|
)%
|
|
|
(48
|
)%
|
|
|
13
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comparison
of the Six Months Ended June 30, 2011 and the Six Months
Ended June 30, 2010
Total Revenue. Total revenue for the six months
ended June 30, 2011 was approximately $28.0 million,
an increase of approximately 344% from approximately
$6.3 million for the corresponding period in 2010. The
increase in total revenue during each of the three and six
months ended June 30, 2011, as compared with the
corresponding periods in 2010, reflected a substantial increase
in the number of communications nodes delivered as part of Duke
Energys Ohio smart grid initiative, as well as increased
software maintenance fees related to our
AmbientNMS®.
Cost of Goods Sold. Cost of goods sold for the six
months ended June 30, 2011 was approximately
$16.0 million, an increase of $12.2 million from
$3.8 million for the corresponding period in 2010. The
increase in cost of goods sold was due primarily to the increase
in sales volume associated with increased activity related to
the Duke Energy Ohio smart grid initiative.
Our policy is to accrue anticipated warranty costs based upon
historical percentages of items returned for repair within one
year of the initial sale. Because the repair rate of products
under warranty has been minimal, we have not established an
historical percentage; therefore, we have not provided for any
warranty liability reserves for the six months ended
June 30, 2010 and 2011.
Gross Profit. Gross profit for the six months ended
June 30, 2011 was approximately $12.0 million, an
increase of $9.5 million from approximately
$2.5 million for the corresponding period in 2010. Our
overall gross margin for the six months ended June 30, 2011
increased to approximately 43% compared with approximately 40%
for the corresponding period in 2010. Gross margin improved over
2010 primarily because of improved manufacturing costs
associated primarily with increased volumes.
Research and Development Expenses. Research and
development expenses for the six months ended June 30, 2011
were approximately $4.9 million, an increase of
$1.9 million from approximately $3.0 million for the
corresponding period in 2010. The increase in research and
development during the 2011 periods was due primarily to
increased personnel and consultant expenses for the continued
development of our fourth generation
37
communications platform, and the enhancement of our
AmbientNMS®.
We believe that our continued development efforts are critical
to our strategic objectives of enhancing our technology while
reducing costs, and therefore, we expect that our research and
development expenses will increase over the next 12 months
as we continue to focus our efforts on developing more robust
solutions and providing additional value-added functionality for
our communications platform. Research and development expenses
consisted of expenses incurred primarily in designing,
developing and field testing our smart grid communications
platform. These expenses consisted primarily of salaries and
related expenses for personnel, contract design and testing
services, supplies used and consulting and license fees paid to
third parties.
Selling, General and Administrative
Expenses. Selling, general and administrative expenses
for the six months ended June 30, 2011 were approximately
$3.5 million, an increase of $1.2 million from
approximately $2.3 million for the corresponding period in
2010. The increase in selling, general and administrative
expenses was due primarily to increased personnel costs and
increased activity regarding our efforts to market the Ambient
Smart
Grid®
communications platform. Selling, general and administrative
expenses consisted primarily of salaries and other related costs
for personnel in executive and other administrative functions.
Other significant costs included professional fees for legal,
accounting and other services. We expect that selling, general
and administrative expenses will increase over the next
12 months as we hire additional personnel associated with
business development activities, incur more expenses associated
with our listing on the NASDAQ Capital Market, incur increased
costs associated with compliance with Sarbanes-Oxley and
increase activity associated with marketing programs targeted at
increasing our overall brand awareness.
Interest Income and Expense. Net interest income for
the six months ended June 30, 2011 was approximately
$11,500 as compared with net interest expense of approximately
$213,000 for the corresponding period in 2010. Interest expense
during the six months ended June 30, 2010 related primarily
to our 8% Secured Convertible Promissory Notes, which were
issued in July and November of 2007 and January 2008 and
included non-cash charges associated with the amortization of
the beneficial conversion features and deferred financing costs
incurred in connection with the placement of the convertible
promissory notes. As of January 31, 2010, all of the
outstanding convertible promissory notes were converted into
shares of our common stock, for which we will no longer incur
interest expenses.
Provision for Income Taxes. As a result of our net
income of approximately $3.5 million for the six months
ended June 30, 2011, we recorded a provision for income
taxes of approximately $109,000 for the six months ended
June 30, 2011. The provision reflected federal alternative
minimum taxes. At December 31, 2010, we had available
approximately $77 million of net operating loss
carryforwards for federal income tax purposes, which expire in
the years 2016 through 2029. However, due to changes in stock
ownership resulting from historical investments provided by
Vicis, we expect that the use of the U.S. net operating
loss carryforwards are significantly limited under
Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code. As such, we
estimate that $61 million or more of our net operating loss
carryforwards will expire and will not be available to use
against future tax liabilities.
Comparison
of the Year Ended December 31, 2010 and the Year Ended
December 31, 2009
Total Revenue. Total revenue for 2010 was
$20.4 million compared with $2.2 million for 2009.
Total revenue for each of 2009 and 2010 represented the sale of
products and license of software to, and maintenance fees from,
Duke Energy. The increase in total revenue for 2010 compared
with 2009 reflected an increase in the number of communications
nodes delivered as part of Duke Energys Ohio smart grid
initiative as well as increased software license fees from the
licensing of our
AmbientNMS®.
Costs of Goods Sold. Cost of goods sold for 2010 was
$12.0 million compared with $1.8 million for 2009. The
increase in cost of goods sold during 2010 primarily reflected
the increase in sales volume to Duke Energy. Cost of goods sold
included all costs related to the manufacture of our products by
a contract manufacturer. The contract manufacturer is
responsible for all aspects of manufacturing, including
procuring most of the key components required for assembly.
Additionally, we recorded approximately $152,000 in charges
associated with the write-off of obsolete inventory during 2009.
38
Our policy is to accrue anticipated warranty costs based upon
historical percentages of items returned for repair within one
year of the initial sale. Because the repair rate of products
under warranty has been minimal, we have not established an
historical percentage; therefore, we have not provided for any
warranty liability reserves for the years ended
December 31, 2010 and 2009.
Gross Profit. Gross profit for 2010 was
$8.3 million compared with $357,000 for 2009. Gross margin
for 2010 increased to approximately 41% compared with
approximately 16% for 2009. The increase in the gross margin for
2010 compared with 2009 was a reflection of the maturing of our
product offering and more stable manufacturing costs, our
enhanced ability to plan production and scale based on increased
lead-time and transparency in the forecasting and purchasing
process of our customer, and a stable and productive
relationship with our contract manufacturer.
Research and Development Expenses. Research and
development expenses were approximately $6.3 million for
2010 compared with $4.9 million for 2009. Research and
development expenses were incurred primarily in designing,
developing and field testing our smart grid communications
platform and consisted primarily of salaries and related
expenses for personnel, contract design and testing services,
supplies used and consulting and license fees paid to third
parties. The increase in research and development during 2010
was primarily due to increased personnel and consultant expenses
required for the continued development of our fourth generation
communications nodes and enhancement of our
AmbientNMS®.
We believe that our continued development efforts are critical
to our strategic objectives of enhancing our technology while
simultaneously reducing costs. We expect that our research and
development expenses will increase in 2011 as we continue to
develop and improve our communications platform.
Selling, General and Administrative
Expenses. Selling, general and administrative expenses
for 2010 were approximately $5.2 million compared with
$4.7 million for 2009. The selling, general and
administrative expenses consisted primarily of salaries and
other related costs for personnel in executive and other
administrative functions. Other significant costs included
professional fees for legal, accounting and other services. The
increase in selling, general and administrative expenses for
2010 compared with 2009 was due to increased efforts to market
and commercialize our communications platform. In 2011, we
expect our selling, general and administrative expenses to
increase as we continue to increase our efforts to market and
commercialize our communication platform.
Interest Income and Expense. We incurred interest
expense of approximately $32,000 for 2010 compared with
approximately $617,000 for 2009. Interest expense related
primarily to our 8% Secured Convertible Promissory Notes, which
were issued in July 2007, and November 2007 and January 2008.
Additionally, we incurred non-cash interest expense of
approximately $184,000 and approximately $4.4 million, for
2010 and 2009, respectively. This non-cash interest expense
related to the amortization of the beneficial conversion
features and deferred financing costs incurred in connection
with the placement of our convertible promissory notes with
Vicis. These costs were amortized to the date of maturity of the
debt unless converted earlier. In January 2010, Vicis converted
the remaining $10 million outstanding on the notes.
Following the conversion of the notes, we no longer had any
long-term debt outstanding. In addition, on June 30, 2009,
we agreed to modify the terms of the expiring Class A
warrants. Under the new terms, the warrants were exercisable
through August 31, 2009 and the exercise prices were
reduced from $20.00 to $15.00 per share. The resulting charge of
approximately $1.1 million due to this modification was
reflected as additional interest expense during 2009.
Comparison
of the Year Ended December 31, 2009 and the Year Ended
December 31, 2008
Total Revenue. Total revenue for 2009 was
approximately $2.2 million compared with approximately
$12.6 million for 2008. Total revenue for 2009 was
attributable to the sales of equipment, software and services to
Duke Energy. Total revenue of $2.2 million in 2009 declined
from $12.6 million in 2008 due mainly to the impact of the
introduction of the ARRA. Although the ARRA was passed in
September 2009, by late 2008 and early 2009, there was
widespread speculation that a significant amount of funding
would be made available for smart grid related initiatives. As a
result, many utilities with smart grid projects underway,
including Duke Energy, substantially slowed their spending until
there was further clarity regarding the amount of funding
available under the federal program. Furthermore, the language
of the Smart Grid Investment Grants, which are part
39
of the ARRA, also provided initial guidance regarding certain
technical criteria required in order for grant eligibility. As
such, utilities needed further clarity that the technology in
their smart grid programs would qualify for funding. As soon as
the ARRA was passed in September 2009, sales of our
communications nodes to Duke Energy increased significantly as
Duke Energy resumed its smart grid implementation in Ohio.
Correspondingly, our total revenue realized for the end of 2009
also began to increase. This phenomena impacted revenue trends
across the entire smart grid sector.
Cost of Goods Sold. Cost of goods sold for 2009 was
approximately $1.8 million compared with approximately
$9.9 million for 2008. The decrease in cost of goods sold
during 2009 was due primarily to a decrease in sales volume
compared with 2008. For 2008 and 2009, cost of goods sold
included inventory write-offs of approximately $482,000 and
approximately $152,000, respectively, for excess, obsolete and
surplus inventory resulting from the transition from the second
generation to the third generation of our technology.
Our policy is to accrue anticipated warranty costs based upon
historical percentages of items returned for repair within one
year of the initial sale. Because the repair rate of products
under warranty has been minimal, we have not established an
historical percentage; therefore, we have not provided for any
warranty liability reserves for the years ended
December 31, 2009 and 2008.
Gross Profit. Gross profit for 2009 was
approximately $357,000 compared with approximately
$2.7 million for 2008. Our overall gross margin also
decreased to 16% in 2009 from 21% in 2008. The decrease in gross
margin in 2009 compared with 2008 was primarily due to changes
to our product mix, higher associated cost of our older
generation products and higher inventory markdowns.
Research and Development Expenses. Research and
development expenses were approximately $4.9 million for
2009 compared with $4.4 million for 2008. The increase in
research and development expenses during 2009 was primarily due
to the increased personnel and consultant expenses for the
development of our X-3100 communications nodes. Research and
development expenses consisted of expenses incurred primarily in
designing, developing and field testing our smart grid
communications platform. These expenses consisted primarily of
salaries and related expenses for personnel, contract design and
testing services, supplies used and consulting and license fees
paid to third parties.
Selling, General and Administrative
Expenses. Selling, general and administrative expenses
consisted primarily of salaries and other related costs for
personnel in executive and other functions. Other significant
costs included insurance and professional fees for legal,
accounting and other services. General and administrative
expenses for 2009 were approximately $4.7 million compared
with $3.6 million for 2008. The increase in operating,
general and administrative expenses was due to the increase in
efforts to market and commercialize our communications platform.
Interest Income and Expense. Interest expense
totaled approximately $5.0 million and $3.1 million,
respectively for 2009 and 2008. Interest totaling approximately
$617,000 for 2009 and approximately $674,000 for 2008 related
primarily to our 8% Secured Convertible Promissory Notes, which
were issued in July 2007, November 2007 and January 2008, and
our 8% Convertible Debentures, which were issued in May
2006 and were retired in their entirety as of January 2,
2008. Additionally, for 2009 and 2008, we incurred non-cash
interest expense of approximately $4.4 million and
$2.5 million, respectively. This interest related to the
amortization of the beneficial conversion features and deferred
financing costs incurred in connection with the placement of our
convertible debentures and notes. These costs were amortized to
the date of maturity of the debt unless converted earlier. In
addition, on June 30, 2009, we agreed to modify the terms
of the expiring Class A warrants. Under the new terms, the
warrants were exercisable through August 31, 2009 and the
exercise prices were reduced from $20.00 to $15.00 per share.
The resulting charge due to the modification was approximately
$1.1 million and was reflected as additional interest
expense.
Loss on Extinguishment of Debt. We accounted for the
November 2008 modification of the convertible promissory notes
that we issued to Vicis between July 2007 and January 2008 as an
extinguishment of debt. We deemed the terms of the amendment to
be substantially different and treated the notes as extinguished
and
40
exchanged for new notes. As such, it was necessary to reflect
the convertible promissory notes at fair market value and record
a loss on extinguishment of debt of approximately
$2.8 million.
Liquidity
and Capital Resources
Since inception, we have primarily funded our operations with
proceeds from the sale of our securities and, most recently,
with revenue from sales of our products. At June 30, 2011,
we had working capital of $10.2 million, including cash and
cash equivalents of $12.5 million. Our cash and cash
equivalents were $8.1 million, $1.0 million and
$7.0 million as of December 31, 2008, 2009 and 2010,
respectively.
Net cash used in operating activities during the years ended
December 31, 2008, 2009 and 2010 was approximately
$5.6 million, $7.7 million and $1.6 million,
respectively. Cash used in operations for the years ended
December 31, 2008, 2009 and 2010 was primarily due to
funding operating losses attributed to spending in research and
development and general and administrative expenses associated
with the development of our technologies and products and to
support the growth of our business. Cash provided by operating
activities was $5.9 million for the six months ended
June 30, 2011 compared with net cash used in operating
activities of $2.0 million for the corresponding period in
2010. Cash provided by operating activities for the six months
ended June 30, 2011 was primarily due to an increase in
product revenue of $21.7 million over the corresponding
period in 2010, thereby significantly increasing gross profit
and generating cash to pay our ongoing operating expenses.
Net cash used in investing activities during the years ended
December 31, 2008, 2009 and 2010 was approximately
$576,000, $269,000 and $527,000, respectively. Net cash used in
investing activities for the six months ended June 30, 2010
and 2011 was approximately $264,000 and $511,000, respectively.
Net cash used in investing activities for all periods was
primarily for additions to fixed assets.
Net cash provided by financing activities during the years ended
December 31, 2008, 2009 and 2010 was approximately
$13.6 million, $964,000 and $8.1 million,
respectively. Net cash provided by financing activities for the
six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2011 was approximately
$2.6 million and $129,000, respectively. Net cash provided
by financing activities for all periods consisted primary of
sales of our securities, which are described in more detail in
the section titled Capitalization History.
We believe that our business plan will provide sufficient
liquidity to fund our operating needs for the next
12 months. However, there are factors that can impact our
ability continue to fund our operating needs, including:
|
|
|
|
|
Our ability to maintain product pricing as expected,
particularly in light of increased competition and its unknown
effects on market dynamics;
|
|
|
Our and our contract manufacturers ability to reduce
manufacturing costs as expected;
|
|
|
Our ability to expand sales volume, which is highly dependent on
the smart grid implementation plans of Duke Energy and other
utilities; and
|
|
|
The need for us to continue to invest in operating activities in
order to remain competitive or acquire other businesses and
technologies in order to complement our products, expand the
breadth of our business, enhance our technical capabilities or
otherwise offer growth opportunities.
|
If we cannot effectively manage these factors, we may need to
raise additional capital in order to fund our operating needs.
We currently do not have any commitments for additional funding.
If we are unable to obtain adequate financing or financing on
terms satisfactory to us when we require it, our ability to
continue to grow or support our business and to respond to
business challenges could be significantly limited.
Off-Balance
Sheet Arrangements
As of December 31, 2009 and 2010, we did not have any
relationships with unconsolidated entities or financial
partnerships, such as entities often referred to as structured
finance or special purpose entities, which would have been
established for the purpose of facilitating off-balance sheet
arrangements or other contractually narrow or
41
limited purposes. Other than our operating leases for office
space and certain other capital lease obligations, we do not
engage in off-balance sheet financing arrangements. In addition,
we do not engage in trading activities involving non-exchange
traded contracts. As such, we are not materially exposed to any
financing, liquidity, market or credit risk that could arise if
we had engaged in these relationships.
Contractual
Obligations and Commitments
The following table summarizes our contractual obligations as of
December 31, 2010. These contractual obligations require us
to make future cash payments.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments Due By Period
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less than 1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
More than 5
|
|
Contractual Obligations
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Year
|
|
|
1 - 3 Years
|
|
|
3 - 5 Years
|
|
|
Years
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Short-Term Debt Obligations
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Capital Lease Obligations
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Lease Obligations
|
|
|
794
|
|
|
|
390
|
|
|
|
404
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase Obligations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Long-Term Liabilities Reflected on the Companys
Balance Sheet under GAAP
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
805
|
|
|
$
|
401
|
|
|
$
|
404
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
Foreign Currency Exchange Risk. We bill our
customers predominately in U.S. dollars and receive payment
predominately in U.S. dollars. Additionally, although our
products are manufactured by our contract manufacturer in China,
we pay our obligations to it in U.S. dollars. Accordingly,
our results of operations and cash flows are not materially
subject to fluctuations due to changes in foreign currency
exchange rates. If we increase sales of our products outside of
the United States, our contracts with foreign customers may be
denominated in foreign currency and may become subject to
changes in currency exchange rates.
Interest Rate Sensitivity. Interest income and
expense are sensitive to changes in the general level of
U.S. interest rates. However, based on the nature and
current level of our investments, which are primarily cash and
cash equivalents, we believe there is no material risk of
exposure.
Seasonality
Historically, we have not experienced significant seasonal
fluctuations or variations in sales. Since our communications
nodes are physical devices that are manually installed by
utilities, weather conditions may temporarily impact the timing
of deployment. However, we do not expect that adverse weather
conditions will result in substantial fluctuations or variations
of sales in any particular reporting period.
Recently
Issued Accounting Pronouncements
The FASB ratified Accounting Statement Update, or ASU,
2009-13,
Revenue
Recognition-Milestone
Method (Topic 605): Multiple-Deliverable Revenue
Arrangements, which eliminates the residual method of
allocation, and instead requires companies to use the relative
selling price method when allocating revenue in a multiple
deliverable arrangement. When applying the relative selling
price method, the selling price for each deliverable shall be
determined using vendor specific objective evidence of selling
price, if it exists, and otherwise using third-party evidence of
selling price. If neither vendor specific objective evidence nor
third-party evidence of selling price exists for a deliverable,
companies shall use their best estimate of the selling price for
that deliverable when applying the relative selling price
method. ASU
2009-13
shall be effective in fiscal years beginning on or after
June 15, 2010, with earlier application permitted.
Companies may elect to adopt this guidance prospectively for all
42
revenue arrangements entered into or materially modified after
the date of adoption, or retrospectively for all periods
presented. We have adopted this standard effective
January 1, 2011. We do not expect the provisions of ASU
2010-13 to
have a material effect on our financial position, results of
operations or cash flows.
In April 2010, the FASB issued ASU
2010-17, or
ASU 2010-17,
Revenue
Recognition-Milestone
Method (Topic 605): Milestone Method of Revenue
Recognition. The amendments in this update are effective
on a prospective basis for milestones achieved in fiscal years,
and interim periods within those years, beginning on or after
June 15, 2010. Early adoption is permitted. If a vendor
elects early adoption and the period of adoption is not the
beginning of the entitys fiscal year, the entity should
apply the amendments retrospectively from the beginning of the
year of adoption. We have adopted this standard effective
January 1, 2011. We do not expect the provisions of ASU
2010-17 to
have a material effect on our financial position, results of
operations or cash flows.
We do not believe that any other recently issued, but not yet
effective, accounting standard if currently adopted would have a
material effect on the accompanying financial statements.
Quarterly
Results of Operations
The following tables set forth selected unaudited quarterly
statements of operations data for the last ten quarters. The
information for each of these quarters has been prepared on the
same basis as the audited annual financial statements included
elsewhere in this prospectus and, in our opinion, includes all
adjustments, which consist only of normal recurring adjustments,
necessary for the fair presentation of the results of operations
for these periods. This data should be read in conjunction with
our audited consolidated financial statements and related notes
included elsewhere in this prospectus. These quarterly operating
results are not necessarily indicative of our operating results
for any future period.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
Mar. 31
|
|
|
June 30
|
|
|
Sept. 30
|
|
|
Dec. 31
|
|
|
Mar. 31
|
|
|
June 30
|
|
|
Sept. 30
|
|
|
Dec. 31
|
|
|
Mar. 31
|
|
|
June 30
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
Total revenue
|
|
$
|
826
|
|
|
$
|
31
|
|
|
$
|
61
|
|
|
$
|
1,275
|
|
|
$
|
1,684
|
|
|
$
|
4,574
|
|
|
$
|
4,976
|
|
|
$
|
9,124
|
|
|
$
|
12,007
|
|
|
$
|
15,986
|
|
Cost of goods sold
|
|
|
731
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
178
|
|
|
|
901
|
|
|
|
1,141
|
|
|
|
2,641
|
|
|
|
2,998
|
|
|
|
5,243
|
|
|
|
6,801
|
|
|
|
9,162
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
95
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
(117
|
)
|
|
|
374
|
|
|
|
543
|
|
|
|
1,933
|
|
|
|
1,978
|
|
|
|
3,881
|
|
|
|
5,206
|
|
|
|
6,824
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research and development expenses
|
|
|
1,082
|
|
|
|
1,109
|
|
|
|
1,342
|
|
|
|
1,413
|
|
|
|
1,577
|
|
|
|
1,398
|
|
|
|
1,273
|
|
|
|
2,066
|
|
|
|
2,088
|
|
|
|
2,805
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
1,215
|
|
|
|
1,226
|
|
|
|
1,146
|
|
|
|
1,075
|
|
|
|
1,175
|
|
|
|
1,130
|
|
|
|
1,270
|
|
|
|
1,664
|
|
|
|
2,011
|
|
|
|
1,496
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
2,297
|
|
|
|
2,335
|
|
|
|
2,488
|
|
|
|
2,488
|
|
|
|
2,752
|
|
|
|
2,528
|
|
|
|
2,543
|
|
|
|
3,730
|
|
|
|
4,099
|
|
|
|
4,301
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating (loss) income
|
|
|
(2,202
|
)
|
|
|
(2,330
|
)
|
|
|
(2,605
|
)
|
|
|
(2,114
|
)
|
|
|
(2,209
|
)
|
|
|
(595
|
)
|
|
|
(565
|
)
|
|
|
151
|
|
|
|
1,107
|
|
|
|
2,523
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest (expense) income, net
|
|
|
(1,832
|
)
|
|
|
(2,493
|
)
|
|
|
(429
|
)
|
|
|
(209
|
)
|
|
|
(213
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
Other (expense) income, net
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(22
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
252
|
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other (loss) income
|
|
|
(1,841
|
)
|
|
|
(2,493
|
)
|
|
|
(430
|
)
|
|
|
(231
|
)
|
|
|
(213
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
252
|
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
81
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income
|
|
$
|
(4,043
|
)
|
|
$
|
(4,823
|
)
|
|
$
|
(3,035
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2,345
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2,422
|
)
|
|
$
|
(595
|
)
|
|
$
|
(313
|
)
|
|
$
|
144
|
|
|
$
|
1,085
|
|
|
$
|
2,448
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income per share (basic)
|
|
$
|
(0.56
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.67
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.37
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.26
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.17
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.04
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.02
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.01
|
|
|
$
|
0.07
|
|
|
$
|
0.15
|
|
Net (loss) income per share (diluted)
|
|
$
|
(0.56
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.67
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.37
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.26
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.17
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.04
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.02
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.01
|
|
|
$
|
0.06
|
|
|
$
|
0.14
|
|
Weighted average shares used in computing basic net (loss)
income per share
|
|
|
7,200
|
|
|
|
7,209
|
|
|
|
8,167
|
|
|
|
8,974
|
|
|
|
14,162
|
|
|
|
15,871
|
|
|
|
15,932
|
|
|
|
15,988
|
|
|
|
16,486
|
|
|
|
16,505
|
|
Weighted average shares used in computing diluted net (loss)
income per share
|
|
|
7,200
|
|
|
|
7,209
|
|
|
|
8,167
|
|
|
|
8,974
|
|
|
|
14,162
|
|
|
|
15,871
|
|
|
|
15,932
|
|
|
|
16,513
|
|
|
|
16,946
|
|
|
|
16,909
|
|
43
OUR
BUSINESS
Overview
We are a leading provider of a smart grid communications
platform that enables utilities to effectively deploy, integrate
and communicate with multiple smart grid applications within the
electric power grid. Our smart grid communications platform
significantly improves the ability of utilities to use advanced
technologies to upgrade their electric power grids, effectively
making the grids more intelligent.
The term smart grid refers to the use of advanced
technologies to upgrade the electric power grid, or the grid,
effectively making the grid more intelligent and efficient. The
grid was largely designed and built decades ago to reliably
distribute electricity from generators to customers in a manner
resulting in sizable capital investments and operating costs. A
number of factors are increasingly straining the grid, including
rapidly growing electricity demand, two-way power flow, the
implementation of renewable and distributed energy sources and
advanced pricing plans. As such, the aging grid is prone to
reliability, security, availability and power quality issues,
costing utilities and consumers billions of dollars each year.
Technology is now revolutionizing the grid and transforming it
into an efficient, communicating energy service platform. We
believe that the smart grid will address the current
shortcomings of the grid and deliver significant benefits to
utilities and consumers of energy, including reduced costs,
increased power reliability and quality, accommodation of
renewable energy technologies, consumer empowerment over energy
consumption and a platform for continued integration of new
technologies.
The Ambient Smart
Grid®
communications platform, which includes hardware, software and
firmware, enables utilities to effectively manage smart grid
applications. Our communications platform provides utilities
with a secure, two-way, flexible and open Internet protocol, or
IP, architecture that efficiently networks smart grid
applications and different technologies within each application
and supports multiple communications technologies currently used
by utilities, such as Wi-Fi, radio frequency, cellular
technologies, power line communications, serial and Ethernet.
Today, our communications platform enables the simultaneous
integration and parallel communication of multiple smart grid
applications provided by a variety of vendors, including smart
metering, demand response and distribution automation. We
believe that the Ambient Smart
Grid®
communications platform delivers significant benefits to
utilities, including support of a single network; an open,
scalable and interoperable platform; preservation of utility
investments; third-party application hosting; remote and
distributed intelligence; secure communications; and reduced
overall implementation and operating costs.
The Ambient Smart
Grid®
products and services include communications nodes; a network
management system,
AmbientNMS®;
integrated applications; and maintenance and consulting
services. The communications nodes, our principal product, are
physical boxes that contain the hardware and software needed for
communications and data collection in support of smart grid
assets. We have configured our communications nodes to act as
individual data processors and collectors that receive signals
from other networked devices, enabling smart grid applications.
Duke Energy, our premier customer, has deployed approximately
55,000 of our communications nodes that receive data from smart
electric and gas meters, using a variety of communications
technologies, and process and transmit these data to the utility
back office over a cellular carrier network for further
processing. Furthermore, our communications nodes, in the fourth
generation of development, also accommodate integrated
applications that include our own developed technology and
third-party technology, thereby substantially increasing their
functionality. By enabling such system interoperability, our
communications platform both reduces implementation and ongoing
communications costs and improves overall power management
efficiencies. We believe that, to date, no other single solution
or technology has provided the necessary flexibility in a
cost-effective manner, enabling a comprehensive digital
communications platform while leveraging standards-based
technologies. We developed our communications platform to fill
this void.
Our long-standing relationship with Duke Energy, which we
believe has one of the most forward-looking smart grid
initiatives in North America, has led to rapid growth in our
business. We entered into a long-term agreement in September
2009 with Duke Energy, currently our sole customer, to supply
Duke Energy with our Ambient Smart
Grid®
communications platform and license our
AmbientNMS®
through 2015. We increased revenue from
44
$2.2 million in 2009 to $20.4 million in 2010 and
generated $28.0 million of additional revenue in the first
six months of 2011. As of June 30, 2011, we had backlog of
approximately $68 million, consisting of products that we
expect to deliver into 2012. We believe that there exists a
significant opportunity for growth with Duke Energy and with
Progress Energy, upon the anticipated completion of the proposed
merger of Duke Energy and Progress Energy announced in January
2011. We also intend to leverage our success with Duke Energy to
secure additional customers.
Industry
Overview
The
Electric Power Distribution Grid
The grid was largely designed and built decades
ago. Rapidly growing electricity demand and the
implementation of renewable and distributed energy sources,
among other factors, are increasingly straining the grid.
According to the U.S. Department of Energy, or DOE, in the
United States 70% of transmission lines are 25 years old or
older; 70% of power transformers are 25 years old or older;
and 60% of circuit breakers are 30 years old or older. The
current grid infrastructure, both in the United States and
abroad, simply is not designed to accommodate the dynamic
electricity distribution requirements of today or the future. As
a result, the aging grid is prone to reliability, security,
availability and power quality issues, costing utilities and
consumers billions of dollars each year. For example, according
to the Electrical Power Research Institute, or EPRI, power
disturbances and quality problems alone cost
U.S. businesses between $119 billion and
$188 billion each year.
The following factors highlight the deficiencies of todays
grid:
Increasing Energy Demand. Worldwide economies and
populations are expanding and that expansion and the
proliferation of electronic devices require more, and higher
quality, electricity. According to the U.S. Energy
Information Administration, or EIA, demand for electricity in
the United States is projected to grow 30% by 2030, requiring
approximately $1.5 trillion in generating and distribution
infrastructure investment. Electrical generation worldwide is
expected to increase approximately 87% from 2007 to 2035. In
comparison, between the years of 1990 and 2003, worldwide
electricity demand increased by only 25%. The increased energy
demand has already begun, and will increasingly continue, to
strain the reliability and integrity of the grid.
Severely Strained and Aging Grid. The strain on the
grid has led to efficiency losses, service interruptions, higher
electricity rates and costly unplanned maintenance and repair
expenses. According to the EPRI, power quality issues alone
already cost between $15 billion and $24 billion per
year in the United States. As consumers and industries increase
their reliance on electronic devices, these disturbances and
quality issues will become more disruptive and more costly.
Increased grid efficiency will help reduce the capital required
for added grid infrastructure.
Inability of the Grid to Support Proliferation of Renewable
Energy and Related Technologies. Over the past few years,
utilities and consumers have increased their adoption of
centralized and distributed renewable energy, such as wind,
solar and energy storage technologies, as a source of
electricity. According to the EIA, renewable energy sources will
account for 23% of total electricity generation worldwide in
2035. Furthermore, expected growth in electric vehicles will
create the need for charging stations, placing additional strain
on the grid. The grid will not be able to accommodate all of
these renewable energy initiatives. Moreover, approximately half
of the states in the United States have some form of renewable
portfolio standards, which require that specified amounts of
electricity are sourced from renewable sources, resulting in a
substantial anticipated increase in the need for grid
modernization. This is a global trend evidenced, in part, by the
European Union, or EU, climate energy goals. The EU has adopted
aggressive climate and energy goals the
20-20-20
targets that aim to reduce EU greenhouse gas
emissions at least 20% below 1990 levels, derive 20% of EU
energy consumption from renewable resources and create a 20%
reduction in primary energy use compared with projected levels
through improving energy efficiency, in each case, by 2020.
45
Limited Real-Time Operational Insight, Communication and
Analysis. The century-old grid in the United States
consists of over 300,000 miles of transmission lines and
over 1,000,000 megawatts of generating capacity. The importance
of todays grid to modern society is unquestionable;
however, it remains largely untouched by modern networking and
communications technologies. For example, power outages are
still manually reported for the majority of the grid. The lack
of communications technologies represents a significant limiting
factor in the amount of information and control available to
both utility operators and their customers. The lack of these
technologies has also had a limiting effect on the ability of
utilities to engage with their customers and for customers to
take an active role in their consumption and cost of energy and
resources.
The Smart
Grid
We believe that the smart grid transformation will address the
shortcomings of the current grid as well as deliver significant
benefits to utilities and consumers of energy. The smart grid
encompasses multiple technologies and applications, and
represents significantly more than just smart electric meters.
The U.S. Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007
provided the following, thorough definition of the smart grid:
The term smart grid refers to a modernization of the
electricity delivery system so it monitors, protects and
automatically optimizes the operation of its interconnected
elements from the central and distributed generator
through the high-voltage network and distribution system, to
industrial users and building automation systems, to energy
storage installations and to end-use consumers and their
thermostats, electric vehicles, appliances and other household
devices. The smart grid will be characterized by a two-way flow
of electricity and information to create an automated, widely
distributed energy delivery network. It incorporates into the
grid the benefits of distributed computing and communications to
deliver real-time information and enable the near-instantaneous
balance of supply and demand at the device level.
In brief, the term smart grid refers to the use of
advanced communications technologies and modern computing
capabilities to upgrade the electric power grid (and even other
utility infrastructures, such as gas and water), effectively
making the grid more intelligent and efficient. We believe that
the implementation of intelligent and seamless communication
across the grid represents the largest expected wave of
information technology spending, similar to the previous
telecommunications and Internet investment cycles.
Smart
Grid Applications
The smart grid will connect millions of devices that generate,
distribute, control, monitor and use energy, thereby enabling
utilities and consumers to dynamically interact with the energy
supply chain. The smart grid is more than just smart meters, and
we believe that fully realizing the benefits of the smart grid
will require the implementation of a variety of technologies and
applications. For all smart grid applications to work seamlessly
together, a flexible and open communications platform is needed
for the interoperability of each connected smart grid
application, including the following:
Smart Meters. Smart meters encompass the meters
themselves, related communications equipment and data management
systems that record and monitor real-time energy consumption
information at regular intervals. Smart meters allow for two-way
communication of data between the smart meter and a
utilitys back office, providing utilities with valuable
information to measure and control production, transmission and
distribution more efficiently and providing consumers with
information to make informed choices regarding energy
consumption. This technology further enables a utility to reduce
the costs of operating its distribution system by automating
various functions that are currently performed manually, such as
reading customer meters and turning power on and off at the
customer meter.
Demand Response. Demand response is an initiative in
which utilities provide incentives to consumers to reduce energy
usage during times of peak demand. Demand response includes
technology that can manage the consumption of electricity in
conjunction with supply and demand fluctuations, enabling
variable pricing and
46
providing information to encourage consumers to make more active
decisions about their energy usage. Utilities can use demand
response to enable consumers to reduce, or provide direct
utility control of, electricity use, particularly during high
price/demand periods, by sending time-differentiated prices to
customers via the meter and recording customers actual
real-time usage. Demand response technology enables utilities to
better manage their distribution network, delivering electricity
more efficiently and potentially reducing peak and baseload
generation requirements.
Distribution Automation. Distribution automation
encompasses utilities deploying control devices and
communications infrastructure to monitor and control energy
distribution in real time, enabling intelligent control over
grid functions at the distribution level. Utilities use
distribution automation applications to directly control the
flow of electricity from individual substations to consumers in
order to improve the quality of power generation, reduce the
frequency, duration and scale of power outages, reduce energy
losses and ultimately optimize operating efficiency and
reliability of the grid.
Network Management Systems. Utilities require back
office software and computer hardware systems to monitor and
manage the vast numbers of devices and information collected by
those devices from various smart grid applications. Network
management systems control smart grid devices and collect and
process data in the back office relying on two-way
communications.
Smart
Grid Requirements
The success of the smart grid, with its promise of delivering
significant benefits to utilities, consumers and the
environment, will depend upon the successful implementation of
smart grid applications that rely on a network communications
infrastructure. Due to the varied nature of applications,
technologies and communication methods, the dedicated
communications infrastructure requires ample flexibility in
order to accommodate and support all connected applications. Key
requirements of the smart grid include the following:
Communications Platform. A secure, flexible and open
communications platform is required to enable the smart grid.
The communications platform provides real-time, two-way
information flow from multiple smart grid applications to a
network management system at a utilitys operations center,
providing the critical foundation upon which a utility deploys
its smart grid applications. A flexible, purpose-built
communications platform accommodates different functional
requirements of each smart grid application, allows different
communications technologies to work in parallel and allows a
utility to rapidly scale a large number of smart grid
applications.
Interoperability. Various agencies, including the
U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology and the
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, are
developing specific smart grid standards that will allow for
software and hardware components from different applications,
vendors and technologies to seamlessly work together.
Interoperability standards, and an open communications platform
that supports them, will allow for growth of the smart grid that
is not predicated on any one proprietary network architecture or
communication technology.
Scalability. As utilities incorporate millions of
smart grid devices into the grid, all of which will generate
vast amounts of information, the communications platform must
both support all connected applications in parallel and allow
for quick and cost-effective deployment of new smart grid
devices and new applications. A communications platform that
cannot scale or is limited with latency or bandwidth issues
seriously curtails realizing the full benefits of a smart grid.
Security. With increasing threats of cyber-attacks
and the corresponding increased sophistication of malicious
technology, communications infrastructure must provide security
to protect the assets of the utility, preserve the reliability
of the grid and protect consumers. Secure,
IP-based
communication protocols are an integral part of any
communications platform.
47
Cost Effectiveness. An interoperable, scalable and
flexible communications platform allows a utility to deploy a
single platform for all smart grid applications, reducing
operation and maintenance costs associated with running separate
networks. A flexible communications platform also allows
utilities to avoid stranding assets by incorporating legacy
technologies into more advanced systems, while also providing a
platform for future technologies.
Anticipated
Smart Grid Investment
Pike Research forecasts that smart grid investment will total
$52 billion in North America by 2015, $80 billion in
Europe by 2020 and $171 billion in Asia by 2015. The
U.S. government is a substantial proponent of smart grid
technologies, primarily through the American Recovery and
Reinvestment Act of 2009, or ARRA, which awarded more than
$3.4 billion in stimulus funding for smart grid technology
development and demonstration, plus $615 million for smart
grid storage, across 99 smart grid initiatives to be spent by
2013. Due to the cost-share nature of the awards,
U.S. investment in smart grid technologies associated with
the ARRA reached approximately $8 billion in projects to be
completed by 2015. The rollout of smart meters, one specific
smart grid application, is currently a driving factor in the
deployment of the smart grid. According to EIA, approximately 7%
of all electric meters in the United States are smart meters,
illustrating a large remaining opportunity for smart meters
alone.
We expect that distribution automation, another important smart
grid application, may represent the fastest growing and
potentially largest area of smart grid investment. According to
SBI Energy, the global substation automation product market is
expected to reach $106 billion by 2015, where a bulk of the
growth is expected to come from countries that are working to
modernize their electricity networks and accommodate smart grid
technologies. We expect future investment in all smart grid
applications and technologies to substantially increase.
Smart
Grid Benefits
The following represent some of the most significant benefits of
the smart grid:
Reduces Costs for Utilities and Consumers. To meet
the growing demand for electricity, utilities will need to
invest substantial capital for added generation and transmission
and distribution infrastructure. However, according to the DOE,
utilities in the United States can save up to $163 billion
through 2025 in costs associated with this investment through
increased energy efficiency with the grid, reducing transmission
congestion and preserving reserve capacity resulting from the
deployment of smart grid applications. By avoiding such
substantial costs, utilities can therefore better mitigate
anticipated consumer rate increases. Moreover, the two-way
communication facilitated by smart grid technologies will
enhance utilities ability to balance supply and demand of
electricity, allowing them to more efficiently utilize their
generation assets and reduce the amount of expensive peak demand
assets. According to the EPRI, an investment of $338 to
$476 billion in smart grid initiatives over the next
20 years will provide overall benefits valued between $1.3
and $2.0 trillion.
Increases Power Reliability and Quality. The smart
grids two-way communications capabilities provide
real-time information about the grids electricity
characteristics, such as current and voltage, allowing grid
operators and smart devices to identify and optimize how
electricity flows through the grid. Smart grid technologies,
such as distributed capacitor banks and Volt/VAR controls, can
smooth out the overall quality of electricity as well as protect
grid elements and customers against sudden power surges and
other transient power events, all while decreasing line loss.
According to the EPRI, power quality issues cost between
$15 billion and $24 billion per year in the United
States, costs that we believe can be substantially avoided by
utilizing the smart grid.
Accommodates Renewable Energy Sources and Electric
Vehicles. Utilities need smart grid technologies to
support the widespread adoption of renewable energy sources,
electric vehicles and other clean technology solutions. The
intermittent nature of renewable electricity, the developing
energy storage technologies and the demand of electric vehicles
all create challenges for utilities in matching energy
generating sources with demand. We believe that each of these
issues is effectively addressed with a full smart grid
implementation.
48
Facilitates Consumer Empowerment. Two-way
communication will allow consumers to proactively monitor and
control the way in which they consume electricity, which will
ultimately help consumers to lower their electricity bills.
According to Energy Insights, 70% of respondents to a survey
conducted in the United States indicated a high interest in
implementing technology in their homes that would keep them
informed of their energy use. Utilities can also develop
improved pricing practices aimed at creating a more efficient
pricing structure that addresses potential pricing inequalities
during normal and peak demand cycles.
Provides a Platform for Technology Innovation. The
development of new smart grid applications and technologies and
their continued integration into the grid are critical to full
development of the smart grid. The smart grid will allow for the
seamless integration of new technologies into the grid without
the need to substantially change existing infrastructure,
thereby avoiding significant capital costs required to support
ever-evolving technologies.
Our
Solution
The
Ambient Smart
Grid®
Communications Platform
The Ambient Smart
Grid®
communications platform, which includes hardware, software and
firmware, enables utilities to both effectively manage smart
grid applications and directly integrate certain applications
into our products themselves. Our communications platform
provides a utility with a secure, two-way, flexible and open IP
architecture that efficiently networks smart grid applications
and different technologies within each application and supports
multiple communications technologies currently used by
utilities, such as Wi-Fi, radio frequency, cellular
technologies, power line communications, serial and Ethernet.
Our communications platform enables the integration of smart
grid applications, such as smart metering, demand response,
distribution automation and monitoring, and direct load control.
It also provides an open and flexible platform allowing for the
addition of multiple applications, as well as enhancements and
future applications.
Our Ambient Smart
Grid®
communications nodes are attached on or near a utilitys
transformer, and they support applications and connectivity to
devices that comprise the smart grid. These communications nodes
are physical boxes we designed for use in the harsh, outdoor
environments in which utilities operate. Our network management
system, known as
AmbientNMS®,
manages the large numbers of devices on a smart grid network. By
enabling such system interoperability, our communications
platform both reduces implementation and ongoing communications
costs, and improves overall power management efficiencies.
Furthermore, our communications nodes also accommodate smart
grid applications installed directly into the communications
nodes, which include our own developed technology and
third-party technology, thereby substantially increasing their
functionality.
The following diagram depicts our products in the utility
infrastructure:
49
Ambient
Smart
Grid®
Benefits
Our products offer the following benefits to utilities:
Support of a Single Network Through Flexible
Communications. Our communications nodes support
multiple communication technologies simultaneously, allowing a
utility to leverage a single communications platform to support
many smart grid applications that rely on different
communication technologies, such as cellular, Wi-Fi, 900MHz
radio frequency, power line carrier, serial and Ethernet, all
operating in parallel in a single communications node.
Open Platform for Scalability and
Interoperability. Our
AmbientNMS®,
or third-party management systems, can manage our open
communications platform. Our communications platform offers
flexibility that allows utilities to deploy multiple smart grid
applications from multiple vendors, including our competitors,
and it can evolve with new technologies.
Preservation of Utility Smart Grid Investments. The
flexibility and open architecture of our communications platform
protect a utility against stranding existing assets, including
an investment in our communications platform itself. It is a
major impediment for utility smart grid investment if a utility
is not able to recover, or is concerned about recovering, the
costs of previously deployed assets. For example, our
communications nodes can support the collection of data from
legacy, one-way communicating meters, which many utilities have
previously installed and carry significant undepreciated value
on their balance sheets. It is generally not cost effective for
utilities to replace these legacy meters with current, two-way
communicating smart meters; however, they can use our
communications nodes to increase the intelligence/functionality
of the existing system and eliminate costly, time-delayed manual
data collection routines, such as drive-by meter readings. As
utilities gradually replace legacy smart grid assets with
current technologies throughout the natural replacement cycle,
they can seamlessly integrate into our existing communications
nodes and communications platform, eliminating the need for a
costly, wholesale deployment as smart grid technologies and
applications continue to evolve.
Local Application Hosting and Development
Framework. We have designed our communications nodes to
host both Ambient-developed applications and third-party
applications. By leveraging our open communications platform,
excess processing power and flash memory, we can integrate smart
grid applications for utilities directly into our communications
nodes, expanding their overall functionality. Our open framework
and flexibility provide an environment for new applications and
the ability to add newly developed or tailored applications to
our communications nodes even after they have been deployed.
Utilities can perform central updates to our communications
nodes, eliminating the need for deploying human and equipment
capital, thereby providing for quick and inexpensive software
updates.
Remote and Distributed Intelligence. Our
communications nodes are equipped with powerful processing
capabilities that allow for local management and control of
smart grid data, which may be aggregated from multiple smart
grid applications. Processing and storage capabilities within
our communications nodes allow a utility to more efficiently
manage a vast amount of distributed data.
Secure Communications. We secure our communications
platform through the use of both physical tamper detection
features and secure protocols that encrypt data traffic.
Additionally, we are active participants in helping to establish
industry standards regarding security and other technical
requirements, allowing us to continually improve the security of
our products.
Reduced Overall Communications Implementation and Operating
Costs. We deliver our communications platform
completely preconfigured to the needs of the utility, allowing
for a rapid and simplified deployment. Simplifying the
deployment process of smart grid applications saves utilities
time and cost because the deployments of smart grid applications
require a substantial human effort. Our communications nodes are
deployed preconfigured and are capable of communicating with
several different applications via a variety of communication
technologies. As a result, no other follow-on effort is required
in order to become active
50
within a utilitys communications network. Furthermore,
there is no need for a utility to develop and invest in
separate, application-specific communications platforms in order
to integrate all smart grid-related assets because our
communications platform provides for a single network that can
accommodate a variety of applications and technologies in
parallel.
Our
Products and Services
We designed an open and flexible communications platform to
ensure interoperability and longevity of smart grid applications
on a cost-effective basis, regardless of environment or
location. Our communications nodes can integrate applications
without the need for further investment in multiple
communications equipment, saving a utility considerable
deployment time and cost. To date, no other single solution or
technology has provided the necessary flexibility in a
cost-effective manner enabling a comprehensive digital
communications platform while leveraging standards-based
technologies. We developed our communications platform to
specifically fill this void. Our communications platform
includes the following:
Ambient Smart
Grid®
Communications Nodes. Communications nodes are
physical boxes that contain the hardware and software needed for
communications and data collection in support of smart grid
assets. We configured our communications nodes to act as
individual data processors and collectors that receive signals
from other networked devices, enabling smart grid applications.
Our communications nodes can also contain our own or third-party
embedded smart grid applications. We are currently in final
testing and evaluation of our fourth-generation communications
nodes. The following is a graphical depiction of how our
communications nodes interact and connect with smart grid
applications and the utility.
AmbientNMS®. AmbientNMS®
is a network management system that manages large numbers of
communications nodes, devices and customers on a smart grid
network. A utility can use the
AmbientNMS®
to effectively manage its entire smart grid distribution system,
providing valuable information over a single communications
network. We customize
AmbientNMS®,
providing a utility with the tools necessary to tailor its
monitoring and processing and to act upon vast amounts of
information on a real-time basis.
AmbientNMS®
also provides the functionality to predict, and precisely
control, the amount of data traffic to be used by individual
devices and the communications network as a whole. Utilities can
systematically push software updates to deployed communications
nodes and other downstream devices.
Ambient Energy Sensing Solution. Our Energy Sensing
Solution monitors critical aspects of a utilitys
distribution network through measurement of current and voltage
characteristics. Having the capability of measuring and
monitoring power quality allows a utility to obtain real-time
insight into characteristics such as power factor and general
power quality, as well as the ability to quickly identify
problem areas from a central location without having to deploy
equipment and human capital to do so. Real-time power quality
monitoring also
51
allows utilities to better interface with their customers who
may have strict tolerances associated with their power
requirements, and it also can provide critical information for
outage notification and restoration systems. The hardware and
software used in our Energy Sensing Solution are incorporated
directly into our communications nodes, creating a much more
efficient use of capital and utility pole real estate.
Partial Discharge Monitoring. The same Energy
Sensing technology that allows our communications platform to
pull current information from the medium voltage distribution
lines, also allows our communications nodes to monitor the
health of the power lines. Real-time information regarding the
health of buried power lines is not generally available today.
Our communications platform offers utilities this information,
thereby allowing utilities the ability to more-effectively
maintain their underground distribution lines and manage their
replacement schedules.
Maintenance and Consulting Services. We provide
maintenance and implementation services to maintain the software
installed within our communications platform. We can remotely
distribute software upgrades and added features to deployed
communications nodes within the network. We also provide a
variety of consulting services relating to product development,
network management services and smart grid deployment
strategies. We provide maintenance and consulting services to
provide a turnkey offering of our communications platform.
Duke
Energy Relationship
Since 2005, we have been a key strategic partner of Duke Energy
and we believe the leading supplier of its smart grid
communications technology in connection with its smart grid
implementation. With what we believe is one of the most
forward-looking smart grid initiatives in North America, Duke
Energy announced plans to invest $1 billion over the next
five years in smart grid equipment for its service territories
including Ohio, Indiana, Kentucky and the Carolinas.
Specifically, Duke Energys smart grid deployment includes
digital and automated technology, such as communications nodes,
smart meters and automated power delivery equipment. The
following table summarizes the evolution of our relationship
with Duke Energy:
|
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
Security and safety testing of our communications nodes
|
2006
|
|
|
|
Delivery of approximately 700 communications nodes for pilot
deployment
|
2008
|
|
|
|
Commercial agreement for 9,000 communications nodes
|
2009
|
|
|
|
Award to Duke Energy of $204 million in ARRA digital grid
stimulus funds and Duke Energy announcement of plans to invest a
total of $1 billion in smart grid deployment initiatives over
five years
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term supply agreement with Duke Energy to supply our
communications nodes and services through 2015
|
2010
|
|
|
|
Full-scale smart grid deployment by Duke Energy in Ohio, which
includes smart meters, automated power distribution equipment
and a communications network encompassing more than 130,000 of
our communications nodes, 700,000 electric meters and 450,000
gas meters
|
|
|
|
|
Deployment by Duke Energy of approximately 20,000 of our
communications nodes
|
2011
|
|
|
|
Cumulative pilot deployment by Duke Energy of approximately
3,000 of our communications nodes in the Carolinas
|
|
|
|
|
Cumulative total of approximately 55,000 communications nodes
deployed
|
|
|
|
|
Ambient total backlog of approximately $68 million, as of June
30, 2011.
|
Duke Energy is actively deploying our communications nodes and
is licensing the
AmbientNMS®
system, specifically for its deployment in Ohio. We believe that
we are the predominant provider of communications nodes and
network management system software for Duke Energys Ohio
deployment.
We believe that we have demonstrated that our technology is
secure, two-way, flexible, open, scalable, reliable and
cost-effective through the total deployment of approximately
55,000 communications nodes in the field with Duke Energy. We
believe that Duke Energy will continue to predominantly use our
communications platform for the remainder of its Ohio smart grid
deployment. Furthermore, Duke Energys pilot deployment of
approximately 3,000 communications nodes in the Carolinas
predominantly uses our communications platform as well.
Throughout the past five years, we have worked with Duke Energy
to develop our communications platform,
52
which has enabled Duke Energys ability to rapidly deploy
its smart grid initiatives. Duke Energy has accelerated its
historical deployment rates and is presently deploying
approximately 6,000 of our communications nodes each month.
We believe that we have a substantial opportunity to grow our
business with Duke Energy. In January 2011, Duke Energy and
Progress Energy announced a proposed merger that is subject to
stockholder and regulatory approval. Together, Duke Energy and
Progress Energy have committed to spend a combined
$1.5 billion in smart grid initiatives, partially funded by
approximately $400 million in total grants awarded to them
in 2010 under the ARRA and required to be spent by 2013. In
addition to the 130,000 communications nodes scheduled for
deployment in Ohio, we estimate that Duke Energy would require
over 670,000 communications nodes if it implements a full
deployment of smart grid communications nodes in Indiana,
Kentucky and the Carolinas. According to Duke Energy, it is
currently working through the planning process to finalize
full-scale deployment plans in Kentucky and the Carolinas and
has filed with the North Carolina Public Utilities Commission
for the required approvals. Duke Energy is using information
from its North Carolina pilot programs and its Ohio deployment
to enhance its customer experience in its other service
territories. We believe that substantially all communications
nodes deployed by Duke Energy to date are our communications
nodes. If Duke Energy and Progress Energy complete their
proposed merger and the combined company adopts Duke
Energys deployment strategy relating to smart grid
initiatives, we estimate a potential deployment of 620,000
additional communications nodes in Progress Energys
territories in Florida and the Carolinas.
Competitive
Strengths
We believe that the following competitive strengths help us to
maintain a leading position in providing smart grid
communications solutions to utilities:
Proven Technology. Since 2008, Duke Energy has
successfully deployed our communications platform. With the
deployment of approximately 55,000 communications nodes
providing the connectivity for a variety of smart grid
applications, we have demonstrated that our technology is
quickly scalable and highly reliable. We believe that our
communications nodes have met all of the strict reliability
requirements of Duke Energy and have proven reliable through
years of exposure to the elements. We believe that our continued
ability to satisfy Duke Energys rigorous qualification
standards and testing, as well as our proven ability to scale,
provides us with an advantage over many of our competitors.
Premier Utility Customer. Duke Energy is one of the
largest utilities in the United States with what we believe to
be one of the most forward-looking smart grid initiatives in
North America. We have served as a strategic partner of Duke
Energys smart grid programs since 2005. Duke Energy has
successfully deployed our products on a commercial scale. We
believe that other utilities will adopt Duke Energys
vision of implementing a communications platform that can
accommodate a variety of smart grid applications and
communications technologies, moving beyond a focus on smart
meters, in order to realize the full benefits of the smart grid.
Communications Focused. Since 2000, we have
maintained a focus on the development of a communications
platform that meets the needs of utilities. Our commitment to
this market segment allows us to focus all research and
development and engineering efforts on meeting the challenges of
this market and rapidly responding to customer needs. We do not
design or provide equipment such as meters or home area network
devices. Rather, we focus on the communications platform that
enables these devices. Our focus, experience and industry
know-how, built over three increasingly robust generations of
our current communications platform, allow us to quickly react
to the ever-changing and individualized needs of utilities,
thereby providing a competitive edge over our competitors with
products that may not represent their core competency.
Purpose-Built Products. Our substantial industry
experience and relationship with Duke Energy have led to the
development of products that are purpose-built for the harsh,
outdoor environments in which utilities must operate. We have
designed our equipment for direct placement onto the
distribution infrastructure, which exposes it to the natural
elements, without the need for an additional enclosure. Further,
the internal elements of our communications
53
nodes include, which includes hardened components, battery
backups, excess surge protection and other components.
Preconfigured and self-registering communications nodes allow
for rapid and safe installation and eliminate the need for
on-site field engineers, reducing installation time and cost.
Our
Growth Strategy
Our objective is to maintain our market leadership position in
providing a communications and application platform that enables
a utilitys comprehensive smart grid initiatives. The
following key initiatives comprise our growth strategy:
Expand Our Relationship with Duke Energy. We plan to
expand our relationship with Duke Energy as it continues its
smart grid deployment initiatives in additional service
territories and with additional applications. We expect that, as
Duke Energy deploys smart grid assets in other regions,
including Indiana, Kentucky and the Carolinas, a significant
opportunity exists for us to provide hundreds of thousands of
our communications nodes. Furthermore, as we continue to work
with Duke Energy, we expect that we will be able to develop and
provide additional product offerings. Finally, if Duke Energy
and Progress Energy complete their proposed merger, we believe
that we will have further expansion opportunities.
Secure New Utility Customers. We intend to leverage
our successful commercial deployment with Duke Energy to secure
new domestic and international customers that are evaluating
communications platforms to accommodate and integrate a variety
of smart grid applications. These new customers may include
utilities that have already deployed smart meter-centric systems
and utilities that are still developing their smart grid plans.
We intend to use this industry momentum in promoting our
communications platform to the many utilities with whom we have
relationships, as well as other utilities interested in an open
communications architecture. We will also promote our
communications platform to utilities that are limited by legacy
metering technology. We believe that our technology can help
utilities expand the functionality of their previously deployed
smart metering initiatives, and we intend to pursue this market
segment. To facilitate this initiative, we expect to
substantially increase our investment in business development
activities, including investing in initiatives aimed at
penetrating both domestic and international markets.
Establish Strategic Relationships. We plan to form
additional strategic relationships with smart grid application
vendors, including meter manufacturers, distribution automation
equipment manufacturers, communications providers and other key
value-added providers in the smart grid industry. By
establishing such relationships, we believe that we can
accelerate the sales of our products. Further, by incorporating
our communications platform into existing smart grid
applications, we can help such providers offer a complete smart
grid solution in addition to the equipment that they offer,
while lowering the overall cost of deployment for a utility.
Continue Product Innovation and Development. We will
continue to invest in the development of new capabilities for
our communications platform in order to meet the evolving needs
of utilities. For example, we have already developed Energy
Sensing Solutions and Partial Discharge Monitoring that are
directly integrated into our communications nodes. We will also
continue to invest in expanding the functionality of our
communications platform to accommodate the proprietary
technologies of our competitors, thereby providing utilities
with the added flexibility of utilizing multiple vendors. We
have released three generations of our Ambient Smart
Grid®
products, and we are currently in the final testing stages of
our fourth generation products, which we expect to begin
shipping in the first half of 2012. With our commitment to
research and development, we believe that we will provide
significantly improved products with greater functionality
delivered at lower cost than previously released products.
Sales and
Marketing
We believe that the successful deployment of Duke Energys
smart grid implementation in Ohio, which includes our
communications platform, will result in other utilities adopting
similar smart grid strategies to fully realize the benefits of
the smart grid. We expect to leverage this success in order to
acquire new utility customers. We expect to
54
increase selling, marketing and business development activities,
including the hire of additional personnel, to secure new
customers domestically and internationally.
Given the strategic impact of smart grid applications on a
utility, a utilitys decision-making processes typically
involves top-level executives and large multi-functional teams
across many organizational layers. Utilities generally undertake
extensive budgeting, procurement, competitive bidding, technical
and performance review activities. Additionally, the regulatory
approval processes can be lengthy. A typical sales cycle with a
new utility can take 12 months or more, depending on the
size of the utility and the smart grid initiatives it intends to
deploy. Utilities generally conduct both lab testing and field
pilots to verify the functionality of products prior to awarding
a contract for a larger deployment. However, based upon our
experience with pilot programs with Duke Energy and the flexible
nature of our communications platform, we believe that we are
well positioned to effectively execute such pilot programs.
Furthermore, new customers can learn how our technology is
deployed within Duke Energys territories. For example, our
communications platform is profiled at Duke Energys
Envision Center in Ohio where prospective customers can observe
the integration of our technology into Duke Energys smart
grid initiatives.
Strategic
Alliances and Relationships
We believe that we possess the internal resources for the
further development of our technology. However, we have, and
will continue to develop, relationships with certain suppliers,
smart grid equipment manufacturers and wireless communication
providers to ensure that we can offer competitive products to
support our business development initiatives. Specifically, we
have established relationships with certain component suppliers,
such as Qualcomm, Sierra Wireless and Novatel Wireless. We have
also entered into joint marketing agreements with certain
wireless communication providers, including Verizon Wireless and
Sprint.
As an example of our efforts to improve the interoperability of
our communications platform with various smart grid
applications, we have entered into an Interoperability and
Co-Marketing Agreement with Tollgrade Communications, Inc., a
leading provider of network assurance solutions for the
telecommunications and utility industries, which allows us to
incorporate its
LightHousetm
centralized remote monitoring system for electric power
utilities and also provides for the opportunity to develop
additional technologies.
Research
and Development
The majority of our employees are engaged in product research
and development activities. We also engage independent
contractors to provide research and development services.
Research and development is critical to ensure the continued
success and growth of our business. We plan to expand our
research and development activities, including hiring additional
personnel. We also intend to continue to work with our customers
so that we can continue to develop and provide additional
product offerings.
We incurred research and development expenses of approximately
$4.4 million in 2008, $4.9 million in 2009,
$6.3 million in 2010 and $4.9 million for the six
months ended June 30, 2011.
Intellectual
Property
We currently rely upon a combination of trade secrets, patents,
copyrights and trademarks, as well as non-disclosure agreements
and invention assignment agreements, to protect our technologies
and other proprietary company information. As of June 30,
2011, our intellectual property portfolio included 25 patents
issued or allowed by the United States Patent and Trademark
Office, or USPTO, and we have 5 pending patent applications in
the United States. We have also filed many of our U.S. patents
in various foreign jurisdictions, and expect that we will file
our U.S. pending patent applications in foreign jurisdictions as
well. Approximately half of our issued and pending U.S. patents
relate to our legacy utilities communications technologies, and
the other half relate to our communications platform, including
our Energy Sensing Solution. Our issued U.S. patents will expire
between 2020 and 2029.
Ambient®,
Ambient Smart
Grid®,
Communications for a Smarter
Grid®
and
AmbientNMS®
are registered trademarks of Ambient Corporation with the USPTO.
We have other marks pending with the USPTO.
55
Our policy is to require our employees, consultants, advisors
and collaborators to execute confidentiality agreements.
Additionally, we require our employees and consultants to
execute assignment of invention agreements upon the commencement
of employment, consulting or advisory relationships. These
agreements generally provide that all confidential information
developed or made known to a party by us during the course of
the partys association with our company is to be kept
confidential and not to be disclosed to third parties except in
specific circumstances. In the case of employees and
consultants, the agreements also provide that all inventions
conceived by the individuals in the course of their employment
or consulting relationship will be our exclusive property.
Employees
As of August 15, 2011, we had 79 full-time
employees. Almost of all of our employees are located at
our Newton, Massachusetts headquarters, and we have three field
engineers located at various Duke Energy locations. None of our
employees are covered by collective bargaining agreements. We
have never experienced any work stoppages and consider our
relations with our employees to be good.
We have a contract with Insperity, formerly known as
Administaff, which is a professional employment organization.
Pursuant to this contract, we and Insperity are co-employers of
our personnel. Insperity is responsible for paying the salaries
and wages of our personnel and providing our personnel with
health, dental and various other types of insurance and benefits
at favorable rates for which we would not otherwise qualify.
Insperity pays salaries and wages of our personnel directly from
our bank accounts, and we pay Insperity a fee for its services.
Manufacturing
and Assembly
We have a Master Supply and Alliance Agreement with Bel Fuse
Inc., a global producer of high-quality electronic components,
for the manufacture and assembly of our communications nodes. We
leverage the capabilities of Bel Fuse Inc. with respect to its
low-cost, global manufacturing capabilities, supply-chain
management and engineering expertise. As we continue to value
engineer our communications nodes, deliver higher volumes and
source alternative key components, we believe that we will
continue to reduce our production costs.
Our products are made to order and are shipped directly to our
customers warehouses in the United States. We purchase
components, such as power cords, brackets and other accessories,
which typically are shipped directly to our customer. In order
to minimize total cost and limit our exposure of excess
inventory, we typically do not hold significant amounts of
finished goods or component materials at any given time.
Competition
Competition in the smart grid market is increasing and involves
evolving technologies, developing industry standards, frequent
new product introductions, changes in customer or regulatory
requirements and localized market requirements. Competitive
pressures require us to keep pace with the evolving needs of
utilities; to continue to develop and introduce new products,
features and services in a timely, efficient and cost-effective
manner; and to stay abreast of regulatory factors affecting the
utility industry.
We compete with a wide array of manufacturers, vendors,
strategic alliances, systems developers and other businesses.
These include smart grid communications technology companies,
ranging from relatively smaller companies focusing mainly on
communications technology to large Internet, hardware and
software companies. In addition, some providers of smart meters
may add communications capabilities in the future to provide
some level of connectivity to the utilitys back office.
Some of our present and potential future competitors have, or
may have, greater name recognition, experience and customer
bases, as well as substantially greater financial, technical,
sales, marketing, manufacturing and other resources than we
possess and that afford them competitive advantages. These
potential competitors may undertake more extensive marketing
campaigns, adopt more aggressive pricing policies, obtain more
favorable pricing from
56
suppliers and manufacturers and exert more influence on sales
channels than we do. Competitors may sell products at lower
prices in order to obtain market share. Competitors may be able
to respond more quickly than we can to new or emerging
technologies and changes in customer requirements. Competitors
may also be able to devote greater resources to the development,
promotion and sale of their products and services than we can.
Competitors may introduce products and services that are more
cost-efficient, provide superior performance or achieve greater
market acceptance than our products and services. Other
companies may also drive technological innovation and develop
products that are equal or superior in quality and performance
to our products and render our products non-competitive or
obsolete.
We believe that we compete effectively in the market based on a
number of factors. These factors include the proven technology
of our communications platform, our successful commercial
deployments with Duke Energy, our focus on our communications
platform, our scalable and interoperable products that we have
purpose-built for the utility environment and our competitive
cost of ownership. However, we may have to change our product
offerings, invest more heavily in research and development or
business development or acquire complementary technologies in
order to remain competitive in the future.
Properties
We do not own any real property. Our corporate office in Newton,
Massachusetts consists of approximately 20,242 square feet
used for office and research and development purposes. The lease
term for the premises commenced in September 2009 and continues
through December 2012. At our request, the landlord agreed that
we could commence the lease earlier, and we completed the move
into our headquarters in August 2009.
Legal
Proceedings
We are not involved in any pending legal proceedings that we
believe could result in a material adverse effect on our
business or operations.
57
MANAGEMENT
The following table sets forth the name, age, and position of
each of our named executive officers and directors:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name
|
|
Age
|
|
Position
|
|
John J. Joyce(1)
|
|
|
59
|
|
|
Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer, President and
Director
|
Ramdas Rao
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
Chief Technology Officer and Senior Vice President
|
Mark L. Fidler
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
Chief Financial Officer, Vice President and Treasurer
|
Michael L. Widland(2)
|
|
|
70
|
|
|
Director
|
D. Howard Pierce(3)(4)
|
|
|
70
|
|
|
Director
|
Thomas Michael Higgins(3)(4)
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
Director
|
Shad L. Stastney(1)
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
Director
|
Francesca E. Scarito(2)(3)
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Member of the finance committee. |
|
(2) |
|
Member of the compensation committee. |
|
(3) |
|
Member of the audit committee. |
|
(4) |
|
Member of the nominating and corporate governance committee. |
John J. Joyce has been the Chairman of our board of
directors and President and Chief Executive Officer since
September 2001, and served as our Chief Operating Officer from
November 2000 through August 2001. Since September 2010,
Mr. Joyce has served on the finance committee. Prior to
August 2011, Mr. Joyce also served as our Treasurer. From
September 1996 to October 2000, Mr. Joyce served as Senior
Vice President of ABB Financial Services Inc. and President of
ABB Financial Consulting, the Americas, where he also led the
global energy consulting practice within Financial Services.
Mr. Joyce developed the Americas branch of ABB Financial
Consulting, the financial management consultancy business of ABB
Financial Services. From December 1993 to August 1996,
Mr. Joyce served with The Capital Markets &
Treasury Practice of Price Waterhouse LLP. Returning to the firm
he had previously served for more than five years in the general
audit practice, Mr. Joyce assumed the responsibilities of
Manager, in which he advised corporations on a variety of
business issues and strategies. Mr. Joyce was promoted to
Director in June 1995. Mr. Joyce brings to our board
significant experience in the energy industry and a deep
knowledge of our business and our customers, and contributes a
perspective based on his previous career in both finance and
accounting.
Ramdas Rao has been our Chief Technology Officer and
Senior Vice President since October 2010, has served as our
Chief Technology Officer since July 2006 and served as our
Chief Network Architect from September 2000 through
July 2006. From March 2000 until September 2000,
Mr. Rao was the Chief Information Officer at Mullen, a
large advertising agency in North America. From November 1995
until February 2000, he was the President and Co-Founder of
Gaialinks Inc., a company engaged in the development of network
management software tools and providing network analysis and
consulting services for large heterogeneous, multi-vendor,
multi-protocol networks and systems. From January 1990 through
November 1995, he was affiliated with Boston University where he
was Associate Director (from January 1995 through November
1995) and a Network Systems Manager (from July 1990 through
December 1994).
Mark L. Fidler joined us as our Principal Financial
Officer and Vice President in June 2011 and became our Chief
Financial Officer, effective as of August 4, 2011, upon the
listing of our common stock on the NASDAQ Capital Market on
August 3, 2011. Mr. Fidler has also served as our
Treasurer since August 15, 2011. Prior to joining our
company, Mr. Fidler spent the last ten years at Evergreen
Solar Inc. in positions of increasing responsibility, first as
Corporate Controller from 2001 to 2006 and most recently as Vice
President of Finance and Treasurer. Prior to his tenure at
Evergreen Solar, Mr. Fidler held various senior finance
roles at The Boston Consulting Group from 1998 to 2001 and
Hampshire Chemical, a division of Dow Chemical, from 1996 to
1998. From 1992 to 1995, Mr. Fidler was with the audit
practice of Coopers & Lybrand. Mr. Fidler brings
to our company significant public company
58
experience within clean technology and provides us with
financial and strategic leadership for our growing company.
Michael L. Widland has served on our board of directors
since November 2000 and serves on the compensation committee as
its chair (since March 2001). Mr. Widland has been actively
practicing law since 1965 and is presently a partner at
Shipman & Goodwin LLP of Stamford, Connecticut.
Mr. Widland practices in the areas of commercial and
corporate transactions, including financing. He is a former
Connecticut Chairman of the Public Contract Section and Business
Law Section of the American Bar Association and a member of the
Association of Commercial Finance Attorneys.
Mr. Widlands academic degrees combined with his
extensive professional experience in corporate law provide our
board with valuable resources in its work to ensure that we
comply with rules and regulations applicable to us.
D. Howard Pierce has served on our board of
directors since November 2004 and serves on the audit committee
(since November 2004) and nominating and corporate
governance committee as its chair (since July 2011). Until his
retirement in June 2001, he served as President and CEO of ABB,
Inc., a $5 billion U.S. subsidiary of global
industrial, energy and automation provider ABB, Ltd. Prior to
assuming leadership of ABB, Inc., Mr. Pierce served in a
number of key executive positions, including President of
ABBs Steam Power Plants and Environmental Systems and
President of ABB China Ltd. In addition to serving on our board,
Mr. Pierce serves on the board of directors of Harsco
Corporation, a publicly traded, New York Stock Exchange-listed
company, where he also serves as chairman of the audit and
compensation committees. Mr. Pierces executive
experience in the international business community with a
specific focus on serving the utility industry while at ABB
provides our board with a business perspective and insight that
is beneficial to a small cap company, especially when
establishing relationships and negotiating agreements with the
larger industrial companies in the utility and communications
industry.
Thomas Michael Higgins has served on our board of
directors since September 2006 and serves on the audit committee
as its chair (since September 2006) and the nominating and
corporate governance committee (since July 2011).
Mr. Higgins has served as the Senior Vice President for
Finance and Chief Financial Officer of the College Board since
June 2003. Prior to the College Board, Mr. Higgins was a
partner in the New York City accounting firm of Silverman Linden
Higgins LLP from February 1993 to June 2003. Mr. Higgins
also worked in the New Jersey offices of Coopers &
Lybrand LLP from January 1992 to January 1993 and at
Ernst & Young LLP from 1977 to 1991. Mr. Higgins
is a member of the American Institute of Certified Public
Accountants as well as the New Jersey and New York State Society
of Certified Public Accountants. Mr. Higgins
extensive experience as a certified public accountant was
instrumental in his appointment to the audit committee of our
board of directors and provides our board with a critical
accounting perspective.
Shad L. Stastney has served on our board of directors
since June 2008. He has also served on the finance committee
since September 2010 and as its chair since August 2011.
Mr. Stastney is a founding partner of Vicis Capital, LLC,
the investment advisor to Vicis Capital Master Fund, or Vicis, a
multi-strategy hedge fund. Mr. Stastney has served as Chief
Operating Officer of Vicis Capital since June 2004. Prior to
Vicis Capital, from July 2001 through May 2004,
Mr. Stastney served in the same capacity at Victus Capital.
Before Victus Capital, Mr. Stastney was a Director at
Credit Suisse First Boston in New York. Mr. Stastney
currently serves on the boards of directors of China
Hydroelectric Corp., China New Energy Group Company, OptimizeRx
Corporation, The Amacore Group, Inc., Master Silicon Carbide
Industries, Inc., Deer Valley Corporation, Infusion Brands
International, Inc., and Zurvita Holdings, Inc. and formerly
served on the board of MDWerks, Inc. and Medical Solutions
Management, Inc. Mr. Stastneys background and
business experience provide our board with a greater
understanding of financial and investor relations.
Francesca E. Scarito has served on our board of directors
since June 2011 and serves on the audit committee (since July
2011) and compensation committee (since July 2011).
Ms. Scarito is President of RS Finance &
Consulting, LLC, a boutique investment bank located in Boston,
Massachusetts. Ms. Scarito has been an investment banker
for over 20 years and has extensive experience in private
capital, equity capital markets and mergers and acquisitions.
Prior to joining RS Finance & Consulting, LLC in April
2009, Ms. Scarito was a Managing Director of Canaccord Adams
Inc. from May 2007 through October 2008. Ms. Scarito also
was a Managing Director at Legacy Partners Group LLC from July
2004 through February 2007 and at its successor Friedman
Billings Ramsey from
59
February 2007 through April 2007. Ms. Scaritos
extensive experience advising corporate executives and boards of
directors on strategic initiatives, financings and capital
markets strategy make her a valuable, objective resource for our
company on these matters.
Our executive officers are appointed by, and serve at the
discretion of, our board of directors. There are no family
relationships between any of the above executive officers or
directors or any other person nominated or chosen to become an
executive officer or a director. Pursuant to the terms of the
employment agreement between us and Mr. Joyce, so long as
the employment agreement remains in effect, Mr. Joyce will
be nominated to the board of directors as part of
managements slate of directors. Additionally, pursuant to
the terms of a securities purchase agreement, dated
July 31, 2007, between us and Vicis, so long as Vicis
fully diluted ownership of the company is 10% or greater, Vicis
is entitled to designate one member to our board of directors.
Board of
Directors
Our board of directors currently consists of six directors. All
directors hold office until the next annual meeting of
stockholders. At each annual meeting of stockholders, the
successors to directors whose terms then expire are elected to
serve from the time of election and qualification until the next
annual meeting following election.
Director
Independence
Our board of directors has determined that four of our six
directors are independent directors within the meaning of the
independent director guidelines of the NASDAQ Listing Rules. The
independent directors are Messrs. Pierce, Higgins and
Widland and Ms. Scarito.
Board
Committees
Our board of directors has established an audit committee, a
compensation committee and a nominating and corporate governance
committee, with each comprised of independent directors. Our
board of directors has also established a finance committee.
Each committee operates under a charter that has been approved
by our board of directors. Copies of our committee charters are
available, without charge, upon request in writing to Ambient
Corporation, 7 Wells Avenue, Newton, Massachusetts 02459, Attn:
Secretary and are posted on the investor relations section of
our website, which is located at www.ambientcorp.com. The
inclusion of our website address in this prospectus does not
include or incorporate by reference the information on our
website into this prospectus.
Audit
Committee
The members of our audit committee are Messrs. Higgins and
Pierce and Ms. Scarito. Mr. Higgins is the chair of
the audit committee and is also an audit committee
financial expert, as defined in applicable SEC rules. The
audit committees responsibilities include the following:
|
|
|
|
|
appointing, approving the compensation of, and assessing the
independence of our independent registered public accounting
firm;
|
|
|
overseeing the work of our independent registered public
accounting firm, including through the receipt and consideration
of reports from such firm;
|
|
|
reviewing and discussing with management and the independent
registered public accounting firm our annual and quarterly
financial statements and related disclosures;
|
|
|
monitoring our internal control over financial reporting,
disclosure controls and procedures and code of business conduct
and ethics;
|
|
|
discussing our risk management policies;
|
|
|
establishing policies regarding hiring employees from the
independent registered public accounting firm and procedures for
the receipt and retention of accounting related complaints and
concerns;
|
|
|
meeting independently with our independent registered public
accounting firm and management;
|
|
|
reviewing and approving or ratifying any related person
transactions; and
|
60
|
|
|
|
|
preparing the audit committee report required by SEC rules.
|
Our audit committee must approve in advance audit and non-audit
services, other than de minimis non-audit services, to be
provided to us by our independent registered public accounting
firm.
Compensation
Committee
The members of our compensation committee are Mr. Widland
and Ms. Scarito. Mr. Widland is the chair of the
compensation committee. The compensation committees
responsibilities include the following:
|
|
|
|
|
reviewing and approving, or making recommendations to our board
with respect to the compensation of our executive officers;
|
|
|
overseeing an evaluation of our senior executives;
|
|
|
reviewing and making recommendations to our board with respect
to cash and equity incentive plans;
|
|
|
administering our equity incentive plans;
|
|
|
reviewing and making recommendations to our board with respect
to director compensation;
|
|
|
reviewing and discussing annually with management our
Compensation Discussion and Analysis disclosure as
and when required by SEC rules; and
|
|
|
preparing the annual compensation committee report required by
SEC rules.
|
Nominating
and Corporate Governance Committee
The members of our nominating and corporate governance committee
are Messrs. Pierce and Higgins. Mr. Pierce is the
chair of the nominating and corporate governance committee. The
nominating and corporate governance committees
responsibilities include the following:
|
|
|
|
|
identifying individuals qualified to become members of our board;
|
|
|
recommending to our board the persons to be nominated for
election as directors and to each of our boards committees;
|
|
|
reviewing and making recommendations to our board with respect
to management succession planning;
|
|
|
developing and recommending to our board corporate governance
principles; and
|
|
|
overseeing an annual evaluation of our board.
|
Finance
Committee
The members of our finance committee are Mr. Joyce and
Mr. Stastney. Mr. Stastney is the chair of the finance
committee. The finance committees responsibilities include
the following:
|
|
|
|
|
reviewing the finance policies and strategies used by our
company to achieve our objectives, including the performance of,
and risk relating to, such policies and strategies;
|
|
|
reviewing the investment policies and strategies used by our
company to achieve our objectives, including the performance of,
and risk relating to, such policies and strategies; and
|
|
|
considering both the ongoing financing needs of our company and
alternative financing mechanisms available to our company, as
well as, making recommendations to the board of directors
regarding the implementation of appropriate financing mechanisms.
|
Our board of directors may from time to time establish other
committees.
Code of
Business Conduct and Ethics
Our board of directors has adopted a written code of business
conduct and ethics that applies to our directors, officers and
employees, including our principal executive officer, principal
financial officer, principal accounting officer or controller,
or persons performing similar functions. Copies of our code of
business conduct and ethics are
61
available, without charge, upon request in writing to Ambient
Corporation, 7 Wells Avenue, Newton, Massachusetts 02459, Attn:
Secretary and are posted on the investor relations section of
our website, which is located at www.ambientcorp.com. The
inclusion of our website address in this prospectus does not
include or incorporate by reference the information on our
website into this prospectus. We also intend to disclose any
amendments to the Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, or any
waivers of its requirements, on our website.
Director
Compensation
The following table presents the total compensation for each
person who served as a non-employee member of our board of
directors for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010.
Mr. Joyce, who is our President and Chief Executive
Officer, receives no compensation for his service as a director.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fees Earned or
|
|
|
Option
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paid in Cash
|
|
|
Awards
|
|
|
Total
|
|
Director Name
|
|
($)
|
|
|
($)(1)
|
|
|
($)
|
|
|
Michael L. Widland
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
|
|
425,383
|
|
|
|
435,383
|
|
D. Howard Pierce
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
|
|
413,567
|
|
|
|
423,567
|
|
Thomas Michael Higgins
|
|
|
16,000
|
|
|
|
374,180
|
|
|
|
390,180
|
|
Shad L. Stastney
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Amounts in this column reflect the aggregate grant date fair
value computed in accordance with FASB ASC 718 with respect
to stock options issued during 2010 under our 2002 Non-Employee
Directors Stock Option Plan. The assumptions used to calculate
the fair value of stock options granted were expected holding
period of 3.75 years, risk free interest rate of .8457%, no
dividend yield and volatility of 157.7% for 2010. |
Compensation
Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation
During 2010, our compensation committee consisted of
Mr. Widland. Mr. Widland has not at any time in the
last year been one of our officers or employees; however,
Mr. Widland is a partner of Shipman & Goodwin
LLP, a law firm which provides legal services for our company
from time to time. Please see Certain Relationships and
Related Party Transactions for more information about our
relationship with Shipman & Goodwin LLP. None of our
executive officers has served as a member of the board of
directors, or as a member of the compensation or similar
committee, of any entity that has one or more executive officers
who served on our board of directors or compensation committee
during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010.
62
EXECUTIVE
COMPENSATION
Summary
Compensation Table
The following table sets forth the total compensation received
for services rendered in all capacities to our company for the
last three fiscal years, which was awarded to, earned by, or
paid to our Chief Executive Officer, Principal Financial Officer
and each of our other most highly compensated executive officers
whose total compensation exceeded $100,000 during 2010, which we
refer to collectively as our Named Executive Officers.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Option
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salary
|
|
Bonus
|
|
Awards
|
|
Total
|
Name and Principal Position
|
|
Year
|
|
($)
|
|
($)
|
|
($)(1)
|
|
($)(2)
|
|
John J. Joyce,
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
360,457
|
|
|
|
60,000
|
|
|
|
1,165,280
|
|
|
|
1,585,737
|
|
President and Chief Executive
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
349,538
|
|
|
|
50,000
|
|
|
|
148,890
|
|
|
|
548,428
|
|
Officer and Principal Financial Officer
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
338,760
|
|
|
|
50,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
388,760
|
|
Ramdas Rao,
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
255,000
|
|
|
|
60,000
|
|
|
|
1,059,345
|
|
|
|
1,374,345
|
|
Chief Technology Officer and
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
245,192
|
|
|
|
50,000
|
|
|
|
148,890
|
|
|
|
444,082
|
|
Senior Vice President
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
213,000
|
|
|
|
50,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
263,000
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Amounts in this column reflect the aggregate grant date fair
value computed in accordance with FASB ASC 718 with respect
to employee stock options issued during 2010, 2009 and 2008
under our 2000 Equity Incentive Plan. The assumptions used to
calculate the fair value of stock option grant were: for 2010:
expected holding period of 5.75 years, risk free interest
rate of 1.475%, no dividend yield and volatility of 154.9% and
for 2009: expected holding period of 5.50 years, risk free
interest rate of 1.44%, no dividend yield and volatility of
162.4%. |
|
(2) |
|
The Named Executive Officers received certain perquisites and
other personal benefits during the periods indicated, the
aggregate value of which did not exceed $10,000. |
Mark L. Fidler joined us as our Principal Financial Officer and
Vice President in June 2011 and became our Chief Financial
Officer effective as of August 4, 2011. Mr. Fidler is
also our Treasurer. Mr. Fidler receives an annual salary of
$250,000, and he received a signing bonus of $12,500. We also
granted to Mr. Fidler a stock option to purchase
20,000 shares of common stock under our 2000 Equity
Incentive Plan at an exercise price of $7.50 per share, which
options will vest in equal installments of 1,667 shares at
the end of each 90 day period, with the first installment
vesting on September 27, 2011. When Mr. Fidler became
Chief Financial Officer, we entered into an employment agreement
with Mr. Fidler, paid him an additional $12,500 bonus and
granted him an additional stock option to purchase
30,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of
$10.40 per share, which options will vest in equal installments
of 2,500 shares at the end of each 90 day period, with the
first installment vesting on October 31, 2011.
Grants of
Plan-Based Awards in 2010
The following table sets forth information on grants of
plan-based awards in 2010 to our Named Executive Officers.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock Awards:
|
|
Grant Date/
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
|
|
Shares of
|
|
of Stock and
|
|
|
|
|
Stock or
|
|
Option Awards
|
Name
|
|
Grant Date
|
|
Units (#)
|
|
($)
|
|
John J. Joyce,
President and Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial
Officer
|
|
|
10/18/2010
|
|
|
|
110,000
|
|
|
|
1,165,280
|
|
Ramdas Rao,
Chief Technology Officer and Senior Vice President
|
|
|
10/18/2010
|
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
|
|
1,059,345
|
|
63
Outstanding
Equity Awards at December 31, 2010
The following table sets forth information concerning equity
awards held by each of our Named Executive Officers as of
December 31, 2010.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Option Awards
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities
|
|
Securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Underlying
|
|
Underlying
|
|
Option
|
|
|
|
|
Options (#)
|
|
Options (#)
|
|
Exercise Price
|
|
Option
|
Name
|
|
Exercisable
|
|
Unexercisable
|
|
($)
|
|
Expiration Date
|
|
John J. Joyce,
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
50.00
|
|
|
|
11/16/2011
|
|
President and Chief Executive Officer and
|
|
|
3,750
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
10.00
|
|
|
|
09/11/2012
|
|
Principal Financial Officer
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
20.00
|
|
|
|
01/26/2014
|
|
|
|
|
5,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
30.00
|
|
|
|
07/20/2014
|
|
|
|
|
5,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
50.00
|
|
|
|
07/20/2014
|
|
|
|
|
25,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
4.50
|
|
|
|
11/15/2017
|
|
|
|
|
45,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
3.50
|
|
|
|
01/13/2019
|
|
|
|
|
13,750
|
|
|
|
96,250
|
|
|
$
|
12.00
|
|
|
|
10/18/2020
|
|
Ramdas Rao,
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
20.00
|
|
|
|
01/15/2012
|
|
Chief Technology Officer and
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
20.00
|
|
|
|
09/11/2012
|
|
Senior Vice President
|
|
|
8,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
20.00
|
|
|
|
01/26/2014
|
|
|
|
|
3,750
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
20.00
|
|
|
|
08/11/2014
|
|
|
|
|
3,750
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
20.00
|
|
|
|
08/11/2014
|
|
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
4.50
|
|
|
|
11/15/2017
|
|
|
|
|
45,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
3.50
|
|
|
|
01/13/2019
|
|
|
|
|
12,500
|
|
|
|
87,500
|
|
|
$
|
12.00
|
|
|
|
10/18/2020
|
|
When he joined our company on June 27, 2011, we granted to
Mark L. Fidler a stock option to purchase 20,000 shares of
common stock under our 2000 Equity Incentive Plan at an exercise
price of $7.50 per share, which options will vest in equal
installments of 1,667 shares at the end of each 90 day
period, with the first installment vesting on September 27,
2011. In connection with the execution of Mr. Fidlers
employment agreement, we granted Mr. Fidler an additional
stock option to purchase 30,000 shares of common stock at
an exercise price of 10.40 per share, which options will vest in
equal installments of 2,500 shares at the end of each 90
day period, with the first installment vesting on
October 31, 2011.
Option
Exercises and Stock Vested in 2010
None of our Named Executive Officers acquired shares upon
exercise of options, or had any stock awards vest, during 2010.
Employment
Agreements
We and John J. Joyce entered into an amended and restated
employment agreement dated as of December 30, 2008 pursuant
to which Mr. Joyce serves as our Chief Executive Officer.
Under the agreement, Mr. Joyce is entitled to be paid an
annual salary of $330,000, subject to an annual review and
adjustments. By its terms, the agreement provided for an initial
term ending December 31, 2010. After expiration of the
initial term, the agreement automatically renews for successive
two-year terms unless terminated by us upon written notice given
not less than 90 days prior to the expiration of the
then-current term. As no such notice has been given, the
agreement remains in effect through December 31, 2012. The
agreement also contains certain provisions for early
termination, including in the event of a change in control,
which may result in a severance payment equal to two years of
base salary then in effect and the continuation of certain
benefits. These severance benefits are discussed in more detail
below under Potential Payments upon Change of Control or
Termination following a Change of Control.
64
We and Ramdas Rao entered into an amended and restated
employment agreement dated as of June 2, 2008, pursuant to
which Mr. Rao serves as our Senior Vice President and Chief
Technology Officer at an annual salary of $225,000, subject to
review. The employment agreement had an initial term that
extended through December 31, 2009, subject to renewal for
successive one-year terms unless either party gives notice of
that partys election to not renew to the other at least
60 days prior to the expiration of the then-current term.
The agreement was renewed through December 31, 2010 and has
been further renewed through December 31, 2011. The
agreement also contains certain provisions for early
termination, which may result in a severance payment equal to
one year of base salary then in effect. These severance benefits
are discussed in more detail below under Potential
Payments upon Change of Control or Termination following a
Change of Control.
We and Mark L. Fidler entered into an employment agreement dated
as of August 4, 2011, pursuant to which Mr. Fidler
serves as our Chief Financial Officer at an annual salary of
$250,000, subject to review. We are obligated to pay
Mr. Fidler, within 10 days of the execution of the
agreement, a $12,500 bonus, less all required deductions.
Further, upon entering into the agreement, we granted
Mr. Fidler a non-qualified stock option to purchase
30,000 shares of our common stock under the 2000 Equity
Incentive Plan. The stock option will vest in equal installments
of 2,500 shares at the end of each 90 day period, with the
first installment vesting on October 31, 2011 and has an
exercise price of $10.40 per share. The agreement also contains
certain provisions for early termination, which may result in a
severance payment equal to one year of base salary then in
effect.
Each of these agreements includes certain confidentiality and
non-compete provisions that prohibit the executive from
competing with us for one year, or soliciting our employees for
one year, following the termination of his employment.
Potential
Payments upon Change of Control or Termination following a
Change of Control
Automatic Acceleration of Vesting Following a Change of
Control. The following table provides the intrinsic
value (that is, the value based upon our closing stock price on
December 31, 2010 of $10.40, less any applicable exercise
price) of stock options of our Named Executive Officers that
would become exercisable or vested as a result of a change of
control as of December 31, 2010.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
Payments
|
|
|
Value of
|
|
and Value of
|
|
|
Unvested
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
Stock Options
|
|
Awards
|
|
|
($)
|
|
($)
|
|
John J. Joyce,
President and Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial
Officer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ramdas Rao,
Vice President and Chief Technology Officer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Automatic Acceleration of Vesting upon an Involuntary
Termination Following a Change of Control. Assuming the
employment of our Named Executive Officers was terminated
involuntarily and without cause, or such officers resigned with
good reason, during the 12 months following a change of
control occurring on December 31, 2010, in accordance with
the terms of the employment agreements with the Named Executive
Officers, our Named Executive Officers would be entitled to cash
payments in the amounts set forth opposite their names in the
below table, subject to any deferrals required under
Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as
amended, or the Code, as well as acceleration of vesting for
outstanding equity awards, as set forth in the below table. The
following table provides the value of compensation and benefits
payable and intrinsic value (that is, the value based upon our
closing stock price on December 31, 2010 of $10.40, less
any applicable exercise price) of stock options
65
that would become exercisable or vested as a result of a
termination occurring immediately following a change of control
as of December 31, 2010.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued
|
|
Value of
|
|
Payments and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuation
|
|
Vacation
|
|
Unvested
|
|
Value of
|
|
|
Base Salary
|
|
Bonus
|
|
of Benefits
|
|
Pay
|
|
Stock Options
|
|
Equity Awards
|
|
|
($)
|
|
($)
|
|
($)
|
|
($)
|
|
($)
|
|
($)
|
|
John J. Joyce,
President and Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial
Officer
|
|
|
759,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
59,115
|
|
|
|
14,596
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
832,711
|
|
Ramdas Rao,
Vice President and Chief Technology Officer
|
|
|
250,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,410
|
|
|
|
9,615
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
271,025
|
|
Risk
Assessment of Compensation Policies and Practices
Our board of directors is responsible for reviewing our policies
and practices with respect to risk assessment and risk
management. In certain circumstances, board committees assist
our board of directors in fulfilling its oversight role in
certain areas of risk. For example, pursuant to its charter, the
audit committee reviews our policies with respect to risk
assessment and risk management associated with the accumulation,
reporting and disclosure of our quarterly and annual historical
financial information.
We have assessed the compensation policies and practices with
respect to our employees, including our executive officers, and
have concluded that they do not create risks that are reasonably
likely to have a material adverse effect on our company. We will
continue to monitor our compensation policies and practices to
determine whether the incentives they create meet our risk
management objectives.
2000
Equity Incentive Plan
The following is a summary of certain material terms of the 2000
Equity Incentive Plan:
Plan Administration. The 2000 Equity Incentive Plan
is administered by our board of directors or, at the discretion
of the board of directors, by a committee composed of at least
one member of the board of directors. The compensation committee
of the board of directors administers the 2000 Equity Incentive
Plan. The compensation committee is authorized, among other
things, to construe, interpret and implement the provisions of
the 2000 Equity Incentive Plan, to select the key employees to
whom awards will be granted, to determine the terms and
conditions of such awards and to make all other determinations
deemed necessary or advisable for the administration of the 2000
Equity Incentive Plan.
Shares Available. The aggregate number of
shares of common stock available for issuance, subject to
adjustment as described below, under the 2000 Equity Incentive
Plan is 2,750,000 after giving effect to an increase in shares
recently approved by our board of directors and majority
stockholder. Such shares may be authorized and unissued shares
or treasury shares. Shares reserved for issuance for grants
under the 2000 Equity Incentive Plan represent approximately
11.1% of our companys issued and outstanding common stock
as of June 30, 2011. Together with the shares reserved for
issuance under the 2002 Non-Employee Directors Stock Option Plan
described below, the shares reserved for issuance under these
plans will represent approximately 14.3% of our companys
outstanding common stock as of June 30, 2011. If any shares
of common stock subject to an award are forfeited or an award is
settled in cash or otherwise terminates for any reason
whatsoever without an actual distribution of shares, the shares
subject to such award will again be available for awards. If any
performance units awarded under the 2000 Equity Incentive Plan
are forfeited or canceled, the performance units will again be
available for awards. If the compensation committee determines
that any stock dividend, recapitalization, split,
reorganization, merger, consolidation, combination, repurchase
or other similar corporate transaction or event, affects the
common stock or the book value of our company such that an
66
adjustment is appropriate in order to prevent dilution or
enlargement of the rights of participants, then the compensation
committee shall adjust any or all of (i) the number and
kind of shares of common stock that may thereafter be issued in
connection with awards, (ii) the number and kind of shares
of common stock issuable in respect of outstanding awards,
(iii) the aggregate number and kind of shares of common
stock available, (iv) the number of performance units which
may thereafter be granted and the book value of our company with
respect to outstanding performance units, and (v) the
exercise price, grant price or purchase price relating to any
award. If deemed appropriate, the compensation committee may
also provide for cash payments relating to outstanding awards;
provided, however, in each case that no adjustment shall be made
which would cause the plan to violate Section 422(b)(1) of
the Code with respect to incentive stock options or would
adversely affect the status of a performance-based award as
performance based compensation under
Section 162(m) of the Code. The compensation committee may
also adjust performance conditions and other terms of awards in
response to unusual or nonrecurring events or to changes in
applicable laws, regulations or accounting principles, except to
the extent that such adjustment would adversely affect the
status of any outstanding performance-based awards as
performance-based compensation under
Section 162(m) of the Code.
Eligibility. Persons eligible to participate in the
2000 Equity Incentive Plan include all key employees and
consultants of our company and its subsidiaries, including our
Named Executive Officers and other senior management as
determined by the compensation committee.
Awards. The 2000 Equity Incentive Plan is designed
to give the compensation committee the maximum flexibility in
providing incentive compensation to key employees and
consultants. The 2000 Equity Incentive Plan provides for the
grant of incentive stock options (which may no longer be granted
under the plan since it was established more than ten years
ago), nonqualified stock options, stock appreciation rights,
restricted stock, bonus stock, awards in lieu of cash
obligations, other stock-based awards and performance units. The
2000 Equity Incentive Plan also permits cash payments either as
a separate award or as a supplement to a stock-based award, and
for the income and employment taxes imposed on a participant in
respect of any award.
Stock Options and Stock Appreciation Rights. The
compensation committee is currently authorized to grant
nonqualified stock options. The compensation committee can also
grant stock appreciation rights entitling the participant to
receive the excess of the fair market value of a share of common
stock on the date of exercise over the grant price of the SAR.
The exercise price per share of common stock subject to an
option and the grant price of an SAR are determined by the
compensation committee, provided that the exercise price of an
incentive stock option or SAR may not be less than the fair
market value (110% of the fair market value in the case of an
incentive stock option granted to a 10% stockholder) of the
common stock on the date of grant. However, the 2000 Equity
Incentive Plan also allows the compensation committee to grant
an option, an SAR or other award allowing the purchase of common
stock at an exercise price or grant price less than fair market
value when it is granted in substitution for some other award or
retroactively in tandem with an outstanding award. In those
cases, the exercise or grant price may be the fair market value
at that date, at the date of the earlier award or at that date
reduced to reflect the fair market value of the award required
to be surrendered as a condition to the receipt of the
substitute award. The terms of each option or SAR, the times at
which each option or SAR will be exercisable, and provisions
requiring forfeiture of unexercised options or SARs and relating
to exercisability or following termination of employment will be
fixed by the compensation committee. However, no incentive stock
option or SAR granted in tandem will have a term exceeding ten
years (or shorter period applicable under Section 422 of
the Code). Options may be exercised by payment of the exercise
price in cash or in common stock, outstanding awards or other
property (including notes or obligations to make payment on a
deferred basis, or through cashless exercises)
having a fair market value equal to the exercise price, as the
compensation committee may determine from time to time. The
compensation committee also determines the methods of exercise
and settlement and certain other terms of the SARs.
Restricted Stock. The 2000 Equity Incentive Plan
also authorizes the compensation committee to grant restricted
stock. Restricted stock is an award of shares of common stock
which may not be disposed of by participants and which may be
forfeited in the event of certain terminations of employment or
certain other events prior to the end of a restriction period
established by the compensation committee. Such an award
entitles the
67
participant to all of the rights of a stockholder of our
company, including the right to vote the shares and the right to
receive any dividends thereon, unless otherwise determined by
the compensation committee.
Other Stock-Based Awards, Bonus Stock and Awards in lieu of
Cash Obligations. In order to enable us to respond to
business and economic developments and trends in executive
compensation practices, the 2000 Equity Incentive Plan
authorizes the compensation committee to grant awards that are
denominated or payable in, or valued in whole or in part by
reference to the value of, our common stock. The compensation
committee will determine the terms and conditions of such
awards, including consideration to be paid to exercise awards in
the nature of purchase rights, the period during which awards
will be outstanding and forfeiture conditions and restrictions
on awards. In addition, the compensation committee is authorized
to grant shares as a bonus, free of restrictions, or to grant
shares or other awards in lieu of our obligations to pay cash or
deliver other property under other plans or compensatory
arrangements, subject to such terms as the compensation
committee may specify.
Cash Payments. The compensation committee may grant
the right to receive cash payments whether as a separate award
or as a supplement to any stock-based awards. Also, to encourage
participants to retain awards payable in stock by providing a
source of cash sufficient to pay the income and employment taxes
imposed as a result of a payment pursuant to, or the exercise or
vesting of, any award, the 2000 Equity Incentive Plan authorizes
the compensation committee to grant a tax bonus in respect of
any award.
Performance Units. The compensation committee is
also authorized to grant performance units. A performance unit
is a right to receive a payment in cash equal to the increase in
the book value of our company if specified performance goals
during a specified time period are met. The compensation
committee has the discretion to establish the performance goals
and the performance periods relating to each performance unit. A
performance goal is a goal expressed in terms of growth in book
value, earnings per share, return on equity or any other
financial or other measurement selected by the compensation
committee, in its discretion, and may relate to the operations
of our company as a whole or any subsidiary, division or
department, and the performance periods may be of such length as
the compensation committee may select. Neither the performance
goals nor the performance periods need be identical for all
performance units awarded at any time or from time to time.
Performance-Based Awards. The compensation committee
may grant awards pursuant to the 2000 Equity Incentive Plan to a
participant who, in the year of grant, may be among our Chief
Executive Officer and the two other most highly compensated
executive officers which are intended to qualify as a
performance-based award. If the compensation committee grants an
award as a performance-based award, the right to receive payment
of such award, other than stock options and SARs granted at not
less than fair market value on the date of grant, will be
conditional upon the achievement of performance goals
established by the compensation committee in writing at the time
such performance-based award is granted. Such performance goals
may vary from participant to participant and performance-based
award to performance-based award. The goals will be based upon
(i) the attainment of specific amounts of, or increases in,
one or more of the following, any of which may be measured
either in absolute terms or as compared to another company or
companies: revenue, earnings, cash flow, net worth, book value,
stockholders equity, financial return ratios, market
performance or total stockholder return,
and/or
(ii) the completion of certain business or capital
transactions. Before any performance-based award is paid, the
compensation committee will certify in writing that the
performance goals applicable to the performance-based award were
in fact satisfied.
Other Terms of Awards. The maximum amount that may
be granted as performance-based awards to any participant in any
calendar year shall not exceed (i) 500,000 performance
units, (ii) a tax bonus payable with respect to the
stock-based awards and performance units and (iii) cash
payments (other than tax bonuses) of $1,000,000. The
compensation committee has the discretion to grant an award to a
participant who may be a Covered Employee which is not a
performance-based award.
In the discretion of the compensation committee, awards may be
settled in cash, common stock, other awards or other property.
The compensation committee may require or permit participants to
defer the distribution of all or part of an award in accordance
with such terms and conditions as the compensation committee may
establish,
68
including payment of reasonable interest on any amounts deferred
under the 2000 Equity Incentive Plan. Awards granted under the
2000 Equity Incentive Plan may not be pledged or otherwise
encumbered. Generally, unless the compensation committee
determines otherwise, awards are not transferable except by will
or by the laws of descent and distribution, or (except in the
case of an incentive stock option) otherwise if permitted under
Rule 16b-3
of the Exchange Act and by the compensation committee. The 2000
Equity Incentive Plan grants the compensation committee broad
discretion in the operation and administration of the 2000
Equity Incentive Plan. This discretion includes the authority to
make adjustments in the terms and conditions of, and the
criteria included in performance conditions related to, any
awards in recognition of unusual or nonrecurring events
affecting our company or in response to changes in applicable
laws, regulations or accounting principles. However, no such
adjustment may adversely affect the status of any outstanding
award as a performance-based award. The compensation committee
can waive any condition applicable to any award, and may adjust
any performance condition specified in connection with any
award, if such adjustment is necessary, to take account of a
change in our companys strategy, performance of comparable
companies or other circumstances. However no adjustment may
adversely affect the status of any outstanding award as a
performance-based award. Awards under the 2000 Equity Incentive
Plan generally will be granted for no consideration other than
services. The compensation committee may, however, grant awards
alone, in addition to, in tandem with, or in substitution for,
any other award under the 2000 Equity Incentive Plan, other
awards under other company plans or other rights to payment from
our company. Awards granted in addition to or in tandem with
other awards may be granted either at the same time or at
different times. If an award is granted in substitution for
another award, the participant must surrender such other award
in consideration for the grant of the new award.
Change of Control. In the event of a change of
control of the company, all awards granted under the 2000 Equity
Incentive Plan (including performance-based awards) that are
outstanding and not yet vested or exercisable or which are
subject to restrictions, will become immediately 100% vested in
each participant or will be free of any restrictions, and will
be exercisable for the remaining duration of the award. All
awards that are exercisable as of the effective date of the
change of control will remain exercisable for the remaining
duration of the award. Under the 2000 Equity Incentive Plan, a
change of control occurs upon any of the following events:
(i) the acquisition, in one or more transactions, of
beneficial ownership by any person or group (other than a
trustee or other fiduciary holding securities under an employee
benefit plan of our company or a subsidiary), of any securities
of the company such that, as a result of such acquisition, such
person or group, either (A) beneficially owns, directly or
indirectly, more than 50% of our companys outstanding
voting securities entitled to vote on a regular basis for a
majority of the members of the board of directors or
(B) otherwise has the ability to elect, directly or
indirectly, a majority of the members of the board of directors;
(ii) a change in the composition of the board of directors
such that a majority of the members of the board of directors
are not Continuing Directors (as defined in the 2000
Equity Incentive Plan); or (iii) our stockholders approve a
merger or consolidation of our company with any other
corporation, other than a merger or consolidation which would
result in the voting securities of our company outstanding
immediately prior thereto continuing to represent (either by
remaining outstanding or by being converted into voting
securities of the surviving entity) at least 50% of the total
voting power represented by the voting securities of our company
or such surviving entity outstanding immediately after such
merger or consolidation, or the stockholders of the company
approve a plan of complete liquidation of our company or an
agreement for the sale or disposition by the company, in one or
more transactions, of all or substantially all our
companys assets. The foregoing events will not be deemed
to be a change of control if the transactions causing such
change are approved in advance by the affirmative vote of at
least a majority of the Continuing Directors.
Amendment and Termination. The 2000 Equity Incentive
Plan is of indefinite duration, continuing until all shares and
performance units reserved therefor have been issued or until
terminated by the board of directors. The board of directors may
amend, alter, suspend, discontinue or terminate the 2000 Equity
Incentive Plan or the compensation committees authority to
grant awards thereunder without further stockholder approval or
the consent of the participants, except stockholder approval
must be obtained within one year after the effectiveness of such
action if required by law or regulation or under the rules of
the securities exchange on which the common stock is then quoted
or listed or as otherwise required by
Rule 16b-3
under the Exchange Act. Notwithstanding the foregoing, unless
approved by the stockholders, no amendment will: (i) change
the class of persons eligible to receive awards;
69
(ii) materially increase the benefits accruing to
participants under the 2000 Equity Incentive Plan; or
(iii) increase the number of shares of common stock subject
to the 2000 Equity Incentive Plan.
2002
Non-Employee Directors Stock Option Plan
The following is a summary of certain material terms of the 2002
Non-Employee Directors Stock Option Plan:
Plan Administration. The 2002 Non-Employee Directors
Stock Option Plan is administered by the board of directors or,
if so determined by our board of directors, by a committee
consisting solely of two or more non-employee directors of our
company. The body administrating the 2002 Non-Employee Directors
Stock Option Plan is referred to as the Administrative
Body. The Administrative Body is authorized to construe,
interpret and implement the provisions of the 2002 Non-Employee
Directors Stock Option Plan, to select the non-employee
directors to whom awards will be granted, to determine the
amount, terms and conditions of such awards and to make all
other determinations deemed necessary or advisable for the
administration of the 2002 Non-Employee Directors Stock Option
Plan. The shares available for grant under the 2002 Non-Employee
Directors Stock Option Plan may be authorized and unissued
shares or treasury shares. If any shares of common stock subject
to an award are forfeited or the award otherwise terminates for
any reason whatsoever without an actual distribution of shares,
the shares subject to such award will again be available for
awards. Only directors not employed by our company or any of its
subsidiaries are eligible to participate in the 2002
Non-Employee Directors Stock Option Plan.
Shares Available. The aggregate number of
shares of common stock available for issuance, subject to
adjustment as described below, under the 2002 Non-Employee
Directors Stock Option Plan is 750,000 shares after giving
effect to an increase in shares recently approved by our board
of directors and majority stockholder. The number of shares
available for issuance under the plan and the number of options
and prices at which they are exercisable are subject to
adjustment in the case of certain transactions such as mergers,
recapitalizations, stock splits or stock dividends.
Awards. Under the 2002 Non-Employee Directors Stock
Option Plan, the Administrative Body may issue only
non-qualified options. Each option granted under the 2002
Non-Employee Directors Stock Option Plan will, unless earlier
terminated as provided in the 2002 Non-Employee Directors Stock
Option Plan, expire six years from the date of grant. If a
non-employee director ceases to serve as a director of our
company, options issued to such a director under the 2002
Non-Employee Directors Stock Option Plan will: (i) in the
case of removal for cause, terminate immediately; (ii) in
the case of death or disability, terminate two years after the
date on which such director ceased to serve; and (iii) in
all other the cases (including failure to be renominated or
reelected), terminate 12 months after such director ceased
to serve. The exercise price of the option will be the fair
market value of the common stock on the date of the grant of the
option.
Amendment and Termination. The 2002 Non-Employee
Directors Stock Option Plan continues in effect through
December 31, 2012. The board of directors may amend, alter,
suspend, discontinue or terminate the 2002 Non-Employee
Directors Stock Option Plan. Notwithstanding the foregoing, any
such amendment, alteration, suspension, discontinuation or
termination shall be subject to the approval of our
companys stockholders if such approval is required by any
applicable law or regulation or any applicable stock exchange
rule. Additionally, without the consent of the an affected
non-employee director, no amendment, alteration, suspension,
discontinuation or termination of the 2002 Non-Employee
Directors Stock Option Plan may materially, adversely affect the
rights of such non-employee director under any option previously
granted.
70
PRINCIPAL
STOCKHOLDERS
The following table sets forth certain information, as of
August 15, 2011, concerning the ownership of our common
stock by: (a) each person who, to our knowledge,
beneficially owned on that date more than 5% of our outstanding
common stock; (b) each of our directors and the Named
Executive Officers; and (c) all of our current directors
and executive officers as a group.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Shares
|
|
Percent Beneficially Owned(2)
|
Name of Beneficial Owner(1)
|
|
Beneficially Owned(2)
|
|
Before this Offering
|
|
After this Offering
|
|
Directors and Executive Officers:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
John J. Joyce(3)
|
|
|
168,150
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
Ramdas Rao(4)
|
|
|
142,650
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
Mark L. Fidler(5)
|
|
|
1,667
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
Michael L. Widland(6)
|
|
|
58,133
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
D. Howard Pierce(7)
|
|
|
57,000
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
Thomas Michael Higgins(8)
|
|
|
57,000
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
Shad L. Stastney
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Francesca E. Scarito
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All directors and executive officers as a group
(8 persons)(9)
|
|
|
484,750
|
|
|
|
2.7
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
5% Stockholders:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vicis Capital Master Fund(10)
|
|
|
14,837,117
|
|
|
|
84.8
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Indicates less than 1% |
|
(1) |
|
Unless otherwise indicated, the address of each person listed is
c/o Ambient
Corporation, 7 Wells Avenue, Newton, Massachusetts 02459. |
|
(2) |
|
Beneficial ownership is determined in accordance with the rules
of the SEC and generally includes voting or investment power
with respect to securities. In accordance with SEC rules, shares
of common stock issuable upon the exercise of options or
warrants that are currently exercisable or that become
exercisable within 60 days following August 15, 2011
are deemed to be beneficially owned by, and outstanding with
respect to, the holder of such option or warrant. Except as
indicated by footnote, and subject to community property laws
where applicable, to our knowledge, each person listed is
believed to have sole voting and investment power with respect
to all shares of common stock beneficially owned by such person. |
|
(3) |
|
Represents (i) 9,400 shares of common stock, and
(ii) 158,750 shares of common stock issuable upon the
exercise of vested options issued under our 2000 Equity
Incentive Plan. Does not include 55,000 shares of common
stock issuable upon exercise of unvested options issued under
our 2000 Equity Incentive Plan. |
|
(4) |
|
Represents (i) 10,150 shares of common stock, and
(ii) 132,500 shares of common stock issuable upon
exercise of vested options issued under our 2000 Equity
Incentive Plan. Does not include 50,000 shares of common
stock issuable upon exercise of unvested options issued under
our 2000 Equity Incentive Plan. |
|
(5) |
|
Represents 1,667 shares of common stock issuable upon
exercise of vested options issued under our 2000 Equity
Incentive Plan. Does not include 48,333 shares of common stock
issuable upon exercise of unvested options issued under our 2000
Equity Incentive Plan. |
|
(6) |
|
Represents (i) 1,333 shares of common stock, and
(ii) 56,800 shares of common stock issuable upon
exercise of vested options issued under our 2002 Directors
Plan. Does not include 21,600 shares of common stock
issuable upon exercise of unvested options issued under our
2002 Directors Plan. |
|
(7) |
|
Represents (i) 2,000 shares of common stock, and
(ii) 55,000 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise
of vested options issued under our 2002 Directors Plan.
Does not include 21,000 shares of common stock issuable
upon exercise of unvested options issued under our
2002 Directors Plan. |
|
(8) |
|
Represents 57,000 shares of common stock issuable upon
exercise of vested options issued under our 2002 Directors
Plan. Does not include 19,000 shares of common stock
issuable upon exercise of unvested options issued under our
2002 Directors Plan. |
71
|
|
|
(9) |
|
Represents (i) 23,033 shares of common stock,
(ii) 292,917 shares of common stock issuable upon
exercise of vested options issued under our 2000 Equity
Incentive Plan, and (iii) 168,800 shares of common
stock issuable upon exercise of vested options issued under the
2002 Directors Plan. Does not include 153,333 shares
of common stock issuable upon exercise of unvested options
issued under our 2000 Equity Incentive Plan and
61,600 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of
unvested options issued under our 2002 Directors Plan. |
|
(10) |
|
Represents (i) 13,882,084 shares of common stock, and
(ii) 955,033 shares of common stock issuable upon
exercise of warrants. All securities are held directly by Vicis
Capital Master Fund, for which Vicis Capital LLC acts as
investment advisor. Vicis Capital LLC may be deemed to
beneficially own shares held by Vicis Capital Master Fund and
any shares issuable to Vicis Capital Master Fund upon exercise
of the warrants within the meaning of
Rule 13d-3
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, by virtue of
the voting and dispositive power over such shares granted by
Vicis Capital Master Fund to Vicis Capital LLC. The voting and
dispositive power granted to Vicis Capital LLC by Vicis Capital
Master Fund may be revoked at any time. Vicis Capital LLC
disclaims beneficial ownership of any shares reported herein.
Shad L. Stastney, a member of our board of directors and a
founder and principal of Vicis Capital LLC, John Succo and Sky
Lucas share voting and dispositive control of these securities.
No single natural person can exercise voting or investment power
with respect to the securities owed by Vicis Capital Master Fund
and investment decisions with respect to these securities are
made by a majority of these persons. Vicis address is 445
Park Avenue,
19th
Floor, Suite 1901, New York, New York 10022. |
CERTAIN
RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
Director
Relationships
We retain the law firm of Shipman & Goodwin LLP, or
S&G, of which Mr. Michael Widland, a non-employee
director and chair of the compensation committee, is a partner,
to perform legal services from time to time. We paid S&G
$88,797 and $57,161 for legal services rendered during 2009 and
2010, respectively.
Mr. Shad Stastney, a director, is a founding partner of
Vicis Capital Master Fund, which holds, as of the date of this
prospectus, approximately 84% of our outstanding stock. The
shares are held directly by Vicis Capital Master Fund, for which
Vicis Capital LLC acts as investment advisor. Vicis Capital LLC
may be deemed to beneficially own the shares within the meaning
of
Rule 13d-3
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, by virtue of
the voting and dispositive power over such shares granted by
Vicis Capital Master Fund to Vicis Capital LLC. The voting and
dispositive power granted to Vicis Capital LLC by Vicis Capital
Master Fund may be revoked at any time. Vicis Capital LLC
disclaims beneficial ownership of any shares reported herein.
Registration
Rights
In connection with the purchase of certain of our securities, we
have granted Vicis registration rights for our common stock,
including shares which may be issued upon conversion of
debentures or exercise of warrants. See Description of
Capital Stock Registration Rights.
Employment
Agreements
We have entered into employment agreements with
Messrs. Joyce, Rao and Fidler. See Executive
Compensation Employment Agreements for
additional information.
Policy
for Approval of Related Party Transactions
The charter of our audit committee requires it to review our
policies and procedures for reviewing and approving or ratifying
related person transactions and to recommend any
changes to our board of directors. In accordance with NASDAQ
rules, the audit committee must conduct appropriate review and
oversight of all related person
72
transactions for potential conflict of interest situations on an
ongoing basis. The audit committee has not adopted policies or
procedures for review of, or standards for approval of, these
transactions.
DESCRIPTION
OF CAPITAL STOCK
The following description briefly summarizes information about
our capital stock. This information does not purport to be
complete and is subject to, and qualified in its entirety by
reference to, the terms of our restated certificate of
incorporation, as amended, and our bylaws, and the applicable
provisions of Delaware law, the state in which we are
incorporated. We urge you to read our restated certificate of
incorporation, as amended, and our bylaws, which are exhibits to
the registration statement of which this prospectus forms a part.
Authorized
Capital Stock
Our authorized capital stock consists of 100,000,000 shares
of common stock, $0.001 par value per share, and
5,000,000 shares of preferred stock, $0.001 par value
per share.
As of August 15, 2011, there were 16,532,228 shares of
common stock outstanding held by approximately 137 stockholders
of record of our common stock. As of August 15, 2011, there
were no shares of preferred stock outstanding.
Common
Stock
Voting. Except as otherwise required by Delaware
law, holders of our common stock are entitled to one vote for
each share held of record on all matters submitted to a vote of
the stockholders. There is no cumulative voting in the election
of directors.
Dividend Rights. Dividends or other distributions in
cash, securities or other property of our company may be
declared from time to time by our board of directors out of
assets and funds legally available for dividend payments. To
date, we have not paid any dividends on our common stock. See
Dividend Policy.
Liquidation and Preemptive Rights. In the event of
our liquidation, dissolution or
winding-up,
holders of our common stock are entitled to share equally on a
per share basis in all assets remaining after payment or
provision of payment of our debts. Holders of our common stock
have no conversion, exchange, preemptive or other subscription
rights. There are no redemption or sinking fund provisions
applicable to our common stock.
Listing. Our common stock is listed on the NASDAQ
Capital Market under the symbol AMBT.
Transfer Agent and Registrar. The transfer agent and
registrar for our common stock is American Stock
Transfer & Trust Company, LLC. Its address is
6201 15th
Avenue, Brooklyn, New York, 11219, and its telephone number is
(718) 921-8200.
Preferred
Stock
We have 5,000,000 shares of preferred stock authorized, but
we have not designated the rights and preferences of these
shares. Our stockholders would have to approve the rights and
preferences of any class or series of preferred stock.
Registration
Rights
Holders of 15,043,891 shares of common stock outstanding and
issuable upon exercise of various warrants are entitled to
specific rights to register those shares in the public market.
These registration rights are set forth in the registration
rights agreement, dated July 31, 2007, as amended on
November 1, 2007, January 15, 2008, April 23,
73
2008 and November 21, 2008, and the registration rights
agreement dated November 16, 2009, in each case, between us
and Vicis and, in some circumstances, in warrants issued by us.
The following description of the terms of the registration
rights agreements and amendments is intended as a summary only
and is qualified in its entirety by reference to the
registration rights agreements and amendments filed as exhibits
to the registration statement, of which this prospectus forms a
part.
Demand Registration Rights. At any time after the
expiration of the
lock-up
agreement with Vicis (see Shares Eligible for Future
Sale
Lock-up
Agreements) Vicis may, pursuant to a registration rights
agreement dated July 31, 2007, which was amended by a
debenture amendment agreement, dated November 21, 2008
between us and Vicis and a registration rights agreement dated
November 16, 2009 between us and Vicis, request that we
register certain registrable shares, including shares issuable
upon conversion of notes and exercise of warrants, for sale
under the Securities Act. Pursuant to this agreement, we will be
required to file a registration statement covering such
registrable securities within 120 days of Vicis
request.
Piggyback Registration Rights. After the completion
of this offering, in the event that we propose to register any
of our securities under the Securities Act (except for the
registration of securities to be offered pursuant to an employee
benefit plan on
Form S-8
or pursuant to a registration made on
Form S-4
or any successor forms then in effect), we are required to
include in these registrations all securities with respect to
which we have received written requests for inclusion under our
registration rights agreements, subject to certain limitations.
Expenses of Registration. We will pay all
registration expenses, other than underwriting discounts and
commissions and any transfer taxes related to any registration.
Indemnification. The registration rights agreements
contain indemnification provisions pursuant to which we are
obligated to indemnify the selling stockholders and any person
who might be deemed to control any selling stockholder in the
event of violation of securities laws or untrue or alleged
untrue statement of material fact attributable to us contained
in the registration statement, any prospectus or form of
prospectus or in any amendment or supplement thereto. The
registration rights agreements require that, as a condition to
including their securities in any registration statement filed
pursuant to demand or piggyback registration rights, the selling
stockholders indemnify us for material misstatements or
omissions attributable to them.
Additionally, the holders of certain warrants are entitled to
registration rights with respect to the shares of our common
stock issuable upon exercise of the warrants. Pursuant to the
terms of these warrants, in the event that we propose to
register any of our securities under the Securities Act (other
than on a registration statement on
Form S-4,
S-8 or other
limited purpose form), we are required, subject to certain
limitations, to include in the registration statement all shares
of our common stock issuable upon exercise of the warrants with
respect to which we have received written requests for inclusion
of such shares under our warrants. An aggregate amount of
1,161,807 shares of our common stock are issuable upon
exercise of warrants containing these registration rights.
SHARES ELIGIBLE
FOR FUTURE SALE
We cannot predict the effect, if any, that market sales of
shares of our common stock or the availability of shares of our
common stock for sale will have on the market price of our
common stock prevailing from time to time. Sales of substantial
amounts of our common stock in the public market, including
shares issued upon exercise of outstanding options and warrants
or in the public market after this offering, or the anticipation
of these sales, could adversely affect the market prices of our
common stock and could impair our future ability to raise
capital through the sale of our equity securities.
Upon completion of this offering, based on our outstanding
shares as of June 30, 2011, we will have outstanding an
aggregate
of shares
of our common stock
( shares
if the underwriters over-allotment is exercised in full).
All of these shares and all of the shares sold in this offering
(plus any shares sold as a result of the underwriters
exercise of the over-allotment option) will be freely tradable
without restriction or further registration
74
under the Securities Act, unless those shares are held by our
affiliates as that term is defined in Rule 144 under the
Securities Act.
Lock-Up
Agreements
In connection with this offering, Vicis and our officers and
directors holding an aggregate of 13,904,967 shares of our
common stock and options and warrants to purchase an aggregate
of 1,631,683 shares of our common stock issuable upon
exercise of outstanding options and warrants, have entered into
lock-up
agreements pursuant to which they have agreed, subject to
limited exceptions, not to offer, sell or otherwise transfer or
dispose of, directly or indirectly, any shares of common stock
or securities convertible into or exchangeable or exercisable
for shares of common stock for a period of 180 days from
the date of this prospectus without the prior written consent of
Stifel, Nicolaus & Company, Incorporated. We have
agreed, subject to limited exceptions, that for a period of
180 days from the date of this prospectus, we will not,
without the prior written consent of Stifel,
Nicolaus & Company, Incorporated, offer, sell or
otherwise transfer or dispose of any shares of common stock or
securities convertible into or exchangeable or exercisable for
shares of common stock, except for the shares of common stock
offered in this offering and the shares of common stock issuable
upon exercise or conversion of options, warrants or securities
outstanding on the date of this prospectus and the awards that
may be granted under our 2000 Equity Incentive Plan and 2002
Non-Employee Directors Stock Option Plan and shares of our
common stock that are issued upon exercise of such awards. There
are no contractually specified conditions for the waiver of
lock-up
restrictions, and any waiver is at the sole discretion of
Stifel, Nicolaus & Company, Incorporated, which may be
granted or denied by Stifel, Nicolaus & Company,
Incorporated for any reason. After the
lock-up
period, these shares may be sold, subject to applicable
securities laws. See Underwriting.
Rule 144
In general, under Rule 144 under the Securities Act of
1933, as amended, as currently in effect, a person who is not
deemed to have been one of our affiliates for purposes of the
Securities Act at any time during the three months preceding a
sale and who has beneficially owned the shares proposed to be
sold for at least six months, including the holding period of
any prior owner other than our affiliates, is entitled to sell
those shares without complying with the manner of sale, volume
limitation or notice provisions of Rule 144, subject to
compliance with the public information requirements of
Rule 144. If such a person has beneficially owned the
shares proposed to be sold for at least one year, including the
holding period of any prior owner other than our affiliates,
then that person is entitled to sell those shares without
complying with any of the requirements of Rule 144.
In general, under Rule 144, as currently in effect, our
affiliates or persons selling shares on behalf of our affiliates
are entitled to sell upon expiration of the
lock-up
agreements described above, within any three-month period
beginning 180 days after the date of this prospectus, a
number of shares that does not exceed the greater of the
following:
|
|
|
|
|
1% of the number of shares of our common stock then
outstanding; or
|
|
|
the average weekly trading volume of the common stock during the
four calendar weeks preceding the filing of a notice on
Form 144 with respect to that sale.
|
Sales under Rule 144 by our affiliates are also subject to
manner of sale provisions and notice requirements and to the
availability of current public information about us.
Stock
Options
We have filed registration statements on
Form S-8
under the Securities Act covering all of the shares of our
common stock subject to options outstanding or reserved for
issuance under our stock incentive plans. Unless subject to a
lock-up
agreement, the shares registered on a
Form S-8
will be eligible for resale at any time.
75
Registration
Rights
After the completion of this offering, holders of
15,043,891 shares of common stock outstanding and issuable
upon exercise of various warrants will be entitled to specific
rights to register those shares for sale in the public market
upon expiration of applicable
lock-up
agreements. See Description of Capital Stock
Registration Rights. Registration of these shares under
the Securities Act would result in the shares becoming freely
tradable without restriction under the Securities Act, except
for shares purchased by affiliates, immediately upon the
effectiveness of the registration statement relating to such
shares.
On August 18, 2011, Vicis executed and delivered to us a
Waiver and Consent, pursuant to which Vicis, among other things,
waived its rights to include its shares of common stock and any
shares of common stock covered by warrants that it holds in the
registration statement of which this prospectus forms a part.
MATERIAL
U.S. FEDERAL INCOME TAX CONSIDERATIONS FOR
NON-U.S.
HOLDERS
OF OUR COMMON STOCK
The following discussion summarizes certain material
U.S. federal income and estate tax considerations relating
to the acquisition, ownership and disposition of our common
stock purchased pursuant to this offering by a
non-U.S.
holder (as defined below). This discussion is based on the
provisions of the U.S. Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as
amended, final, temporary and proposed U.S. Treasury
regulations promulgated thereunder and current administrative
rulings and judicial decisions, all as in effect as of the date
hereof. All of these authorities may be subject to differing
interpretations or repealed, revoked or modified, possibly with
retroactive effect, which could materially alter the tax
consequences to
non-U.S. holders
described in this prospectus.
There can be no assurance that the Internal Revenue Service, or
IRS, will not take a contrary position to the tax consequences
described herein or that such position will not be sustained by
a court. No ruling from the IRS or opinion of counsel has been
obtained with respect to the U.S. federal income or estate
tax consequences to a
non-U.S. holder
of the purchase, ownership or disposition of our common stock.
This discussion is for general information only and is not
tax advice. All prospective
non-U.S. holders
of our common stock should consult their own tax advisors with
respect to the U.S. federal, state, local and
non-U.S. tax
consequences of the purchase, ownership and disposition of our
common stock.
As used in this discussion, the term
non-U.S. holder
means a beneficial owner of our common stock that is not any of
the following for U.S. federal income tax purposes:
|
|
|
|
|
an individual who is a citizen or a resident of the United
States;
|
|
|
a corporation or other entity taxable as a corporation for
U.S. federal income tax purposes that was created or
organized in or under the laws of the United States, any state
thereof or the District of Columbia;
|
|
|
an estate whose income is subject to U.S. federal income
taxation regardless of its source;
|
|
|
a trust (a) if a U.S. court is able to exercise
primary supervision over the trusts administration and one
or more U.S. persons have the authority to control all of
the trusts substantial decisions or (b) that has a
valid election in effect under applicable U.S. Treasury
regulations to be treated as a U.S. person; or
|
|
|
an entity that is disregarded as separate from its owner if all
of its interests are owned by a single person described above.
|
An individual may be treated, for U.S. federal income tax
purposes, as a resident of the United States in any calendar
year by being present in the United States on at least
31 days in that calendar year and for an aggregate of at
least 183 days during a three-year period ending in the
current calendar year. The
183-day test
is determined by counting all of the days the individual is
treated as being present in the current year, one-third of such
days in the immediately preceding year and one-sixth of such
days in the second preceding year. Residents are subject to
U.S. federal income tax as if they were U.S. citizens.
Certain individuals may avoid classification as a resident alien
76
under various statutory exceptions or, in the case of
individuals who would be classified as income tax residents of
the United States and a country with a treaty with the United
States, tie breaker rules set forth in applicable tax treaties.
This discussion assumes that a prospective
non-U.S. holder
will hold shares of our common stock as a capital asset
(generally, property held for investment). This discussion does
not address all aspects of U.S. federal income and estate
taxation that may be relevant to a particular
non-U.S. holder
in light of that
non-U.S. holders
individual circumstances. In addition, this discussion does not
address any aspect of U.S. state or local or
non-U.S. taxes,
or the special tax rules applicable to particular
non-U.S. holders,
such as the following:
|
|
|
|
|
insurance companies and financial institutions;
|
|
|
tax-exempt organizations;
|
|
|
controlled foreign corporations and passive foreign investment
companies;
|
|
|
partnerships or other pass-through entities;
|
|
|
regulated investment companies or real estate investment trusts;
|
|
|
pension plans;
|
|
|
persons who received our common stock as compensation;
|
|
|
brokers and dealers in securities;
|
|
|
owners that hold our common stock as part of a straddle, hedge,
conversion transaction, synthetic security or other integrated
investment; and
|
|
|
former citizens or residents of the United States subject to tax
as expatriates.
|
If a partnership or other entity treated as a partnership for
U.S. federal income tax purposes is a beneficial owner of
our common stock, the treatment of a partner in the partnership
generally will depend on the status of the partner and the
activities of the partnership. We urge any beneficial owner of
our common stock that is a partnership and partners in that
partnership to consult their tax advisors regarding the
U.S. federal income tax consequences of acquiring, owning
and disposing of our common stock.
Distributions
on Our Common Stock
Any distribution on our common stock paid to
non-U.S. holders
will generally constitute a dividend for U.S. federal
income tax purposes to the extent paid from our current or
accumulated earnings and profits, as determined under
U.S. federal income tax principles. Distributions in excess
of our current and accumulated earnings and profits will
generally constitute a return of capital to the extent of the
non-U.S. holders
adjusted tax basis in our common stock, and will be applied
against and reduce the
non-U.S. holders
adjusted tax basis. Any remaining excess will be treated as
capital gain, subject to the tax treatment described below in
Gain on Sale, Exchange or Other Disposition of
Our Common Stock.
Dividends paid to a
non-U.S. holder
that are not treated as effectively connected with the
non-U.S. holders
conduct of a trade or business in the United States generally
will be subject to withholding of U.S. federal income tax
at a rate of 30% on the gross amount paid, unless the
non-U.S. holder
is entitled to an exemption from or reduced rate of withholding
under an applicable income tax treaty. In order to claim the
benefit of a tax treaty or to claim an exemption from
withholding, a
non-U.S. holder
must provide an IRS-approved certificate of eligibility prior to
payment of the dividends. For most individuals and corporations,
such certificate will be a properly completed and executed IRS
Form W-8BEN
(or successor form). For most partnerships or other pass-through
entities, a certificate of eligibility may consist of a
completed, signed IRS
Form W-8IMY.
A
non-U.S. holder
eligible for a reduced rate of withholding pursuant to an income
tax treaty may be eligible to obtain a refund of any excess
amounts withheld by timely filing an appropriate claim for a
refund with the IRS.
Dividends paid to a
non-U.S. holder
that are treated as effectively connected with a trade or
business conducted by the
non-U.S. holder
within the United States (and, if an applicable income tax
treaty so provides, are also attributable to a permanent
establishment or a fixed base maintained within the United
States by the
non-U.S. holder)
are generally exempt from the 30% withholding tax if the
non-U.S. holder
satisfies applicable certification and
77
disclosure requirements. To obtain the exemption, a
non-U.S. holder
must provide us with a properly executed IRS
Form W-8ECI
(or successor form) prior to the payment of the dividend.
Dividends received by a
non-U.S. holder
that are treated as effectively connected with a U.S. trade
or business generally are subject to U.S. federal income
tax at rates applicable to U.S. persons. A
non-U.S. holder
that is a corporation may, under certain circumstances, be
subject to an additional branch profits tax imposed
at a rate of 30%, or such lower rate as specified by an
applicable income tax treaty between the United States and such
holders country of residence.
A
non-U.S. holder
who provides us with an IRS
Form W-8BEN,
Form W-8IMY
or
Form W-8ECI
must update the form or submit a new form, as applicable, if
there is a change in circumstances that makes any information on
such form incorrect.
All
non-U.S. holders
are encouraged to consult with their tax advisors regarding
U.S. tax return filing requirements in connection with
distributions on our common stock. In some cases, if there is
adequate withholding at the source, the
non-U.S. holder
may be exonerated from having to file a return.
Gain on
Sale, Exchange or Other Disposition of Our Common
Stock
In general, a
non-U.S. holder
will not be subject to any U.S. federal income tax or
withholding on any gain realized from the
non-U.S. holders
sale, exchange or other disposition of shares of our common
stock except as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
the gain is effectively connected with a U.S. trade or
business (and, if an applicable income tax treaty so provides,
is also attributable to a permanent establishment or a fixed
base maintained within the United States by the
non-U.S. holder),
in which case the gain will be taxed on a net income basis
generally in the same manner as if the
non-U.S. holder
were a U.S. person, and, if the
non-U.S. holder
is a corporation, the additional branch profits tax described
above in Distributions on Our Common
Stock may also apply;
|
|
|
the
non-U.S. holder
is an individual who is present in the United States for
183 days or more in the taxable year of the disposition and
certain other conditions are met, in which case the
non-U.S. holder
will, unless exempted by an applicable tax treaty, be subject to
a 30% tax on the net gain derived from the disposition, which
may be offset by
U.S.-source
capital losses of the
non-U.S. holder
(for that year only), if any;
|
|
|
the
non-U.S. holder
is an entity that fails to meet certain disclosure requirements
imposed under the Hiring Incentives to Restore Employment Act of
2010 described below in Backup Withholding and Information
Reporting; or
|
|
|
we are, or have been at any time during the five-year period
preceding such disposition (or the
non-U.S. holders
holding period, if shorter), a United States real property
holding corporation.
|
Generally, we will be a United States real property
holding corporation if the fair value of our
U.S. real property interests equals or exceeds 50% of the
sum of the fair values of our worldwide real property interests
and other assets used or held for use in a trade or business,
all as determined under applicable U.S. Treasury
regulations. We believe that we have not been and are not
currently, and do not anticipate becoming in the future, a
United States real property holding corporation for
U.S. federal income tax purposes.
Backup
Withholding and Information Reporting
We must report annually to the IRS and to each
non-U.S. holder
the amount of distributions paid to such holder and the amount
of tax withheld, if any. Copies of the information returns filed
with the IRS to report the distributions and withholding also
may be made available to the tax authorities in a country in
which the
non-U.S. holder
is a resident under the provisions of an applicable income tax
treaty or agreement.
The United States imposes a backup withholding tax on the gross
amount of dividends and certain other types of payments
(currently at a rate of 28%). Dividends paid to a
non-U.S. holder
will not be subject to backup withholding if proper
certification of foreign status is provided, (usually on IRS
Form W-8BEN)
and we do not have actual knowledge or reason to know that the
non-U.S. holder
is a U.S. person. In addition, no backup withholding or
78
information reporting will be required regarding the proceeds of
a disposition of our common stock made by a
non-U.S. holder
within the United States or conducted through certain
U.S. financial intermediaries if we receive the
certification of foreign status described in the preceding
sentence and we do not have actual knowledge or reason to know
that such
non-U.S. holder
is a U.S. person or the
non-U.S. holder
otherwise establishes an exemption.
Non-U.S. holders
should consult their own tax advisors regarding the application
of the information reporting and backup withholding rules to
them.
Backup withholding is not an additional tax. Amounts withheld
under the backup withholding rules from a payment to a
non-U.S. holder
can be refunded or credited against the
non-U.S. holders
U.S. federal income tax liability, if any, provided that
certain required information is furnished to the IRS in a timely
manner.
In addition to backup withholding, the Hiring Incentives to
Restore Employment Act of 2010, or the HIRE Act, requires that
dividends and certain other payments made after
December 31, 2012 to
non-U.S. entities
(including without limitation foreign financial institutions and
foreign corporations) be subject to a 30% withholding tax if the
non-U.S. entity
does not meet certain disclosure requirements. If the
non-U.S. entity
is a foreign financial institution, the 30% withholding tax
would apply to dividends and to gains on the sale, exchange or
other disposition of our common stock unless the foreign
financial institution enters a written agreement with the IRS to
provide information and disclosure regarding certain accounts
owned by U.S. persons held with such financial institution
including written annual reports regarding such accounts and the
U.S. account holders. If the
non-U.S. entity
is not a financial institution, the 30% withholding tax would
apply to dividends and to gains on the sale, exchange or other
disposition of our common stock unless such
non-U.S. entity
certifies to us (on an IRS-approved form) that such entity does
not have a substantial U.S. owner or otherwise provides the
name, current address and U.S. taxpayer identification
number of each substantial U.S. owner. Certain
non-financial foreign entities, including publicly traded
corporations, are not required to provide such certification. We
will require compliance with the HIRE Act on or before
December 31, 2012 from all
non-U.S. entities
holding our common stock or will impose the mandatory 30%
withholding tax (regardless of receipt of a properly completed
IRS
Form W-8BEN
noted above).
All
non-U.S. holders
are encouraged to consult with their tax advisors regarding
possible implications of backup withholding or the HIRE Act.
U.S.
Federal Estate Tax
An individual
non-U.S. holder
who is treated as the owner, or who has made certain lifetime
transfers, of an interest in our common stock may be required to
include the value of the common stock in his or her gross estate
for U.S. federal estate tax purposes, and may be subject to
U.S. federal estate tax unless an applicable estate tax
treaty provides otherwise. Under current U.S. federal law,
individual
non-U.S. holders
of our common stock may be subject to U.S. federal estate
tax at a maximum rate of 35% on taxable U.S. assets that
exceed $60,000 in value (a U.S. federal estate tax return
may be required for amounts below $60,000 if the decedent made
substantial lifetime gifts of U.S. property). This federal
estate tax would apply to any individual
non-U.S. holder
if such person owned our common stock at the time of his or her
death on or after January 1, 2011.
79
UNDERWRITING
Subject to the terms and conditions set forth in an underwriting
agreement, each of the underwriters named below has severally
agreed to purchase from us the aggregate number of shares of
common stock set forth opposite its name below:
|
|
|
|
|
Underwriters
|
|
Number of Shares
|
|
|
Stifel, Nicolaus & Company, Incorporated
|
|
|
|
|
Needham & Company, LLC
|
|
|
|
|
ThinkEquity LLC
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The underwriting agreement provides that the obligations of the
several underwriters are subject to various conditions,
including approval of legal matters by counsel. The nature of
the underwriters obligations commits them to purchase and
pay for all of the shares of common stock listed above if any
shares are purchased.
The underwriting agreement provides that we will indemnify the
underwriters against liabilities specified in the underwriting
agreement under the Securities Act, or will contribute to
payments that the underwriters may be required to make relating
to these liabilities.
Stifel, Nicolaus & Company, Incorporated expects to
deliver the shares of common stock to purchasers on or
about ,
2011.
Over-Allotment
Option
We have granted a
30-day
over-allotment option to the underwriters to purchase up to a
total of additional shares of our
common stock from us at the public offering price, less the
underwriting discount payable by us, as set forth on the cover
page of this prospectus. If the underwriters exercise this
option in whole or in part, then each of the underwriters will
be separately committed, subject to the conditions described in
the underwriting agreement, to purchase the additional shares of
our common stock in proportion to their respective commitments
set forth in the table above.
Underwriting
Discount
The underwriters propose to offer the shares of common stock
directly to the public at the public offering price set forth on
the cover page of this prospectus, and at this price less a
concession not in excess of $ per
share of common stock to other dealers specified in a master
agreement among underwriters who are members of the Financial
Industry Regulatory Authority, Inc. After this offering, the
offering price, concessions and other selling terms may be
changed by the underwriters. Our common stock is offered subject
to receipt and acceptance by the underwriters and to other
conditions, including the right to reject orders in whole or in
part.
The following table summarizes the compensation to be paid to
the underwriters by us and the proceeds, before expenses,
payable to us:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
Without
|
|
With
|
|
|
Per Share
|
|
Over-Allotment
|
|
Over-Allotment
|
|
Public offering price
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Underwriting discount
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds, before expenses, to us
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We estimate that the expenses in this offering payable by us,
not including the underwriting discount, will be approximately
$ .
80
Indemnification
of Underwriters
We will indemnify the underwriters against some civil
liabilities, including liabilities under the Securities Act and
liabilities arising from breaches of our representations and
warranties contained in the underwriting agreement. If we are
unable to provide this indemnification, we will contribute to
payments the underwriters may be required to make in respect of
those liabilities.
No Sales
of Similar Securities
The underwriters will require all of our directors and officers
and our majority stockholder, Vicis, to agree not to offer,
sell, agree to sell, directly or indirectly, or otherwise
dispose of any shares of common stock or any securities
convertible into or exchangeable for shares of common stock
except for the shares of common stock offered in this offering
without the prior written consent of Stifel,
Nicolaus & Company, Incorporated for a period of
180 days after the date of this prospectus.
We have agreed, subject to limited exceptions, that for a period
of 180 days from the date of this prospectus, we will not,
without the prior written consent of Stifel,
Nicolaus & Company, Incorporated, offer, sell or
otherwise transfer or dispose of any shares of common stock or
securities convertible into or exchangeable or exercisable for
shares of common stock, except for the shares of common stock
offered in this offering and the shares of common stock issuable
upon exercise or conversion of options, warrants or securities
outstanding on the date of this prospectus and the awards that
may be granted under our 2000 Equity Incentive Plan and 2002
Non-Employee Directors Stock Option Plan and shares of our
common stock that are issued upon exercise of such awards. There
are no contractually specified conditions for the waiver of
lock-up
restrictions, and any waiver is at the sole discretion of
Stifel, Nicolaus & Company, Incorporated, which may be
granted or denied by Stifel, Nicolaus & Company,
Incorporated for any reason.
NASDAQ
Capital Market Listing
Our common stock is listed on the NASDAQ Capital Market under
the symbol AMBT.
Short
Sales, Stabilizing Transactions, and Penalty Bids
In order to facilitate this offering, persons participating in
this offering may engage in transactions that stabilize,
maintain or otherwise affect the price of our common stock
during and after this offering. Specifically, the underwriters
may engage in the following activities in accordance with the
rules of the SEC.
Short Sales. Short sales involve the sales by the
underwriters of a greater number of shares than they are
required to purchase in the offering. Covered short sales are
short sales made in an amount not greater than the
underwriters over-allotment option to purchase additional
shares from us in this offering. The underwriters may close out
any covered short position by either exercising their
over-allotment option to purchase shares or purchasing shares in
the open market. In determining the source of shares to close
out the covered short position, the underwriters will consider,
among other things, the price of shares available for purchase
in the open market as compared to the price at which they may
purchase shares through the over-allotment option. Naked short
sales are any short sales in excess of such over-allotment
option. The underwriters must close out any naked short position
by purchasing shares in the open market. A naked short position
is more likely to be created if the underwriters are concerned
that there may be downward pressure on the price of the common
stock in the open market after pricing that could adversely
affect investors who purchase in this offering.
Stabilizing Transactions. The underwriters may make
bids for or purchases of the shares for the purpose of pegging,
fixing or maintaining the price of the shares, so long as
stabilizing bids do not exceed a specified maximum.
81
Penalty Bids. If the underwriters purchase shares in
the open market in a stabilizing transaction or syndicate
covering transaction, they may reclaim a selling concession from
the underwriters and selling group members who sold those shares
as part of this offering. Stabilization and syndicate covering
transactions may cause the price of the shares to be higher than
it would be in the absence of these transactions. The imposition
of a penalty bid might also have an effect on the price of the
shares if it discourages presales of the shares.
The transactions above may occur on the NASDAQ Capital Market or
otherwise. Neither we nor the underwriters make any
representation or prediction as to the effect that the
transactions described above may have on the price of the
shares. If these transactions are commenced, they may be
discontinued without notice at any time.
LEGAL
MATTERS
Shipman & Goodwin LLP, Hartford, Connecticut, which
has acted as our counsel in connection with this offering, will
pass on the validity of the common stock being offered by this
prospectus. Mr. Michael L. Widland, a non-employee
director, is a partner in the law firm Shipman &
Goodwin LLP, and owns 1,333 shares of our common stock and
holds options to purchase 78,400 shares of our common stock
at various prices. Greenberg Traurig, LLP, Phoenix, Arizona, is
acting as counsel to the underwriters.
EXPERTS
The financial statements as of, and for the years ended,
December 31, 2009 and 2010 included in this prospectus have
been so included in reliance on the report of Rotenberg Meril
Solomon Bertiger & Guttilla, P.C., independent
registered public accounting firm, given on the authority of
said firm as experts in auditing and accounting.
WHERE YOU
CAN FIND MORE INFORMATION
We file annual, quarterly and current reports, proxy statements
and other information with the SEC. You may read and copy any
reports, statements or other information we file with the SEC at
the SECs Public Reference Room at 100 F Street,
NE, Washington, D.C. 20549. You may obtain information on
the operation of the Public Reference Room by calling the SEC at
1-800-SEC-0330.
In addition, the SEC maintains a website at www.sec.gov
containing reports, proxy and information statements and
other information regarding registrants that file electronically
with the SEC, including us.
We have filed with the SEC under the Securities Act a
Registration Statement on
Form S-1,
of which this prospectus is a part, with respect to the shares
offered hereby. This prospectus, which constitutes a part of the
Registration Statement, does not contain all of the information
set forth in the Registration Statement, certain items of which
are contained in exhibits and schedules as permitted by the
rules and regulations of the SEC. You can obtain a copy of the
Registration Statement from the SEC at the address listed above
or from the SECs Internet website at www.sec.gov.
Statements made in this prospectus as to the contents of any
contract, agreement or other document referred to herein are not
necessarily complete. With respect to each contract, agreement
or other document filed as an exhibit to the Registration
Statement or in a filing incorporated by reference herein or
otherwise, reference is made to the exhibit for a more complete
description of the matters involved, and each statement shall be
deemed qualified in its entirety by this reference.
82
AMBIENT
CORPORATION
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page
|
|
|
|
|
F-2
|
|
Audited Consolidated Financial Statements:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-3
|
|
|
|
|
F-4
|
|
|
|
|
F-5
|
|
|
|
|
F-6
|
|
|
|
|
F-7
|
|
Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-22
|
|
|
|
|
F-23
|
|
|
|
|
F-24
|
|
|
|
|
F-25
|
|
F-1
REPORT OF
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of
Ambient Corporation:
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of
Ambient Corporation and Subsidiary (the Company) as
of December 31, 2009 and 2010, and the related consolidated
statements of operations, changes in stockholders equity
(deficit) and cash flows for the years ended December 31,
2008, 2009 and 2010. The consolidated financial statements are
the responsibility of the Companys management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial
statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are
free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to
have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal
control over financial reporting. Our audits included
consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a
basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the
circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion
on the effectiveness of the Companys internal control over
financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An
audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence
supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial
statements, assessing the accounting principles used and
significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating
the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that
our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred
to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial
position of the Company as of December 31, 2009 and 2010
and the results of its operations and cash flows for the years
ended December 31, 2008, 2009 and 2010 in conformity with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America.
/s/ ROTENBERG MERIL SOLOMON BERTIGER &
GUTTILLA, P.C.
ROTENBERG MERIL SOLOMON BERTIGER & GUTTILLA, P.C.
Saddle Brook, New Jersey
February 23, 2011, except Note 2 relating to the
reverse
stock split, which is July 18, 2011
F-2
AMBIENT
CORPORATION
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
(Audited)
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except share and per share data)
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
987
|
|
|
$
|
6,987
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
1,239
|
|
|
|
1,731
|
|
Inventory
|
|
|
361
|
|
|
|
834
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
|
|
|
203
|
|
|
|
276
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
2,790
|
|
|
|
9,828
|
|
Fixed assets, net
|
|
|
603
|
|
|
|
745
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
3,393
|
|
|
$
|
10,573
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and stockholders (deficit) equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
$
|
2,016
|
|
|
$
|
3,608
|
|
Accrued expenses
|
|
|
829
|
|
|
|
633
|
|
Deferred revenue
|
|
|
159
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital lease obligations, current portion
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
Convertible debt, current portion (net of discount)
|
|
|
9,816
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
12,831
|
|
|
|
4,251
|
|
Deferred rent
|
|
|
85
|
|
|
|
186
|
|
Capital lease obligations, less current portion
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
12,928
|
|
|
|
4,437
|
|
Stockholders (deficit) equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $0.001 par value, 20,000,000 shares
authorized, 8,990,397 and 16,493,764 shares issued; and
8,980,397 and 16,483,764 shares outstanding, respectively
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
130,898
|
|
|
|
149,748
|
|
Accumulated deficit
|
|
|
(140,242
|
)
|
|
|
(143,428
|
)
|
Less: treasury stock; 10,000 shares at cost
|
|
|
(200
|
)
|
|
|
(200
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders (deficit) equity
|
|
|
(9,535
|
)
|
|
|
6,136
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders (deficit) equity
|
|
$
|
3,393
|
|
|
$
|
10,573
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Audited Consolidated Financial Statements.
F-3
AMBIENT
CORPORATION
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
(Audited)
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
Total revenue
|
|
$
|
12,622
|
|
|
$
|
2,193
|
|
|
$
|
20,358
|
|
Cost of goods sold
|
|
|
9,942
|
|
|
|
1,836
|
|
|
|
12,023
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
2,680
|
|
|
|
357
|
|
|
|
8,335
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research and development expenses
|
|
|
4,351
|
|
|
|
4,946
|
|
|
|
6,314
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
3,600
|
|
|
|
4,662
|
|
|
|
5,239
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
7,951
|
|
|
|
9,608
|
|
|
|
11,553
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating loss
|
|
|
(5,271
|
)
|
|
|
(9,251
|
)
|
|
|
(3,218
|
)
|
Interest (expense) income, net
|
|
|
(3,116
|
)
|
|
|
(4,963
|
)
|
|
|
(214
|
)
|
Loss on extinguishment of debt
|
|
|
(2,789
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other (expense) income, net
|
|
|
(118
|
)
|
|
|
(32
|
)
|
|
|
246
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other (loss) income
|
|
|
(6,023
|
)
|
|
|
(4,995
|
)
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
$
|
(11,294
|
)
|
|
$
|
(14,246
|
)
|
|
$
|
(3,186
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss per share
|
|
$
|
(3.75
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1.81
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.21
|
)
|
Weighted average shares used in computing net loss per share
|
|
|
3,016
|
|
|
|
7,891
|
|
|
|
15,385
|
|
See Notes to Audited Consolidated Financial Statements.
F-4
AMBIENT
CORPORATION
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
|
Paid-in
|
|
|
Treasury
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Capital
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
|
Deficit
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(Audited)
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except share data)
|
|
|
Balance January 1, 2008
|
|
|
2,556,157
|
|
|
$
|
256
|
|
|
$
|
113,181
|
|
|
$
|
(200
|
)
|
|
$
|
(114,702
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,465
|
)
|
Common stock issued upon exercise of warrants
|
|
|
4,643,651
|
|
|
|
464
|
|
|
|
(222
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
242
|
|
Issuance of warrants in connection with convertible promissory
note
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,146
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,146
|
|
Beneficial conversion feature of convertible promissory note
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,541
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,541
|
|
Issuance of warrants
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,955
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,955
|
|
Share-based compensation expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
329
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
329
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11,294
|
)
|
|
|
(11,294
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance December 31, 2008
|
|
|
7,199,808
|
|
|
$
|
720
|
|
|
$
|
132,930
|
|
|
$
|
(200
|
)
|
|
$
|
(125,996
|
)
|
|
$
|
7,454
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock issued upon exercise of warrants
|
|
|
116,422
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
940
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
952
|
|
Common stock issued upon exercise of options
|
|
|
7,500
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
Common stock issued upon conversion of convertible debt
|
|
|
1,666,667
|
|
|
|
167
|
|
|
|
2,333
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,500
|
|
Remeasurement of beneficial conversion feature of convertible
promissory note
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8,333
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8,333
|
)
|
Warrant repricing
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,147
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,147
|
|
Share-based compensation expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
967
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
967
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(14,246
|
)
|
|
|
(14,246
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance December 31, 2009
|
|
|
8,990,397
|
|
|
$
|
899
|
|
|
$
|
130,008
|
|
|
$
|
(200
|
)
|
|
$
|
(140,242
|
)
|
|
$
|
(9,535
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock issued upon exercise of warrants
|
|
|
28,590
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
97
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
Common stock issued upon exercise of options
|
|
|
8,110
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
Proceeds from sale of common stock
|
|
|
800,000
|
|
|
|
80
|
|
|
|
7,920
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,000
|
|
Common stock issued upon conversion of convertible debt
|
|
|
6,666,667
|
|
|
|
667
|
|
|
|
9,333
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
Share-based compensation expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
725
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
725
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,186
|
)
|
|
|
(3,186
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance December 31, 2010
|
|
|
16,493,764
|
|
|
$
|
1,649
|
|
|
$
|
148,115
|
|
|
$
|
(200
|
)
|
|
$
|
(143,428
|
)
|
|
$
|
6,136
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Audited Consolidated Financial Statements.
F-5
AMBIENT
CORPORATION
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
(Audited)
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Cash flows from operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
$
|
(11,294
|
)
|
|
$
|
(14,246
|
)
|
|
$
|
(3,186
|
)
|
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating
activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
307
|
|
|
|
303
|
|
|
|
380
|
|
Amortization of note discount
|
|
|
1,235
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of beneficial conversion feature of convertible debt
|
|
|
1,247
|
|
|
|
3,228
|
|
|
|
184
|
|
Financing costs related to warrant modification
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,147
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing, consulting and other expenses paid via the
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
issuance of common stock and warrants
|
|
|
329
|
|
|
|
967
|
|
|
|
725
|
|
Gain (loss) on conversion and extinguishment of debt
|
|
|
2,789
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(252
|
)
|
Gain on disposition of property and equipment
|
|
|
118
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Increase) decrease in:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivables
|
|
|
(1,475
|
)
|
|
|
430
|
|
|
|
(492
|
)
|
Inventory
|
|
|
376
|
|
|
|
(263
|
)
|
|
|
(473
|
)
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
|
(28
|
)
|
|
|
(74
|
)
|
Increase (decrease) in:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
320
|
|
|
|
682
|
|
|
|
1,592
|
|
Deferred rent
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
85
|
|
|
|
101
|
|
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities
|
|
|
342
|
|
|
|
(108
|
)
|
|
|
56
|
|
Deferred revenue
|
|
|
108
|
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
|
(159
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in operating activities
|
|
|
(5,549
|
)
|
|
|
(7,720
|
)
|
|
|
(1,592
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Redemption of marketable securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
125
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of marketable securities
|
|
|
(125
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additions to property and equipment
|
|
|
(451
|
)
|
|
|
(394
|
)
|
|
|
(527
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities
|
|
|
(576
|
)
|
|
|
(269
|
)
|
|
|
(527
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of common stock
|
|
|
242
|
|
|
|
976
|
|
|
|
8,000
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of warrants
|
|
|
3,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
Proceeds from exercise of stock options
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
Finance costs relating to the issuance of warrants
|
|
|
(45
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of notes payable
|
|
|
2,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds related to the adjustment of terms of convertible
debentures
|
|
|
8,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repayment of convertible debentures
|
|
|
(103
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments of capitalized lease obligations
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by financing activities
|
|
|
13,591
|
|
|
|
964
|
|
|
|
8,119
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
7,466
|
|
|
|
(7,025
|
)
|
|
|
6,000
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year
|
|
|
546
|
|
|
|
8,012
|
|
|
|
987
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year
|
|
$
|
8,012
|
|
|
$
|
987
|
|
|
$
|
6,987
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-cash financing and investing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of common stock in connection with conversion of debt
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
10,000
|
|
Issuance of warrants in connection with issuance of notes payable
|
|
|
3,146
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition of property and equipment financed by capital lease
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental cash flow information:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest paid
|
|
$
|
115
|
|
|
$
|
675
|
|
|
$
|
226
|
|
See Notes to Audited Consolidated Financial Statements.
F-6
AMBIENT
CORPORATION
|
|
NOTE 1
|
DESCRIPTION
OF BUSINESS
|
Ambient Corporation (Ambient, the
Company, we or us) is a
leading provider of a smart grid communications platform that
enables utilities to effectively deploy, integrate and
communicate with multiple smart grid applications within the
electrical power distribution grid. The Ambient Smart
Grid®
communications platform, which includes hardware, software and
firmware, today enables the simultaneous integration and
parallel communication of multiple smart grid applications
provided by a variety of vendors, including smart metering,
demand response and distribution automation.
Our long-standing relationship with Duke Energy, which we
believe has one of the most forward-looking smart grid
investment initiatives in North America, has led to rapid growth
in our business. We entered into a long-term agreement in
September 2009 with Duke Energy, currently our sole customer, to
supply Duke Energy our Ambient Smart
Grid®
communications nodes and license our
AmbientNMS®
through 2015.
|
|
NOTE 2
|
SUMMARY
OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
|
Reverse
Stock Split
All share and per share data have been adjusted to reflect the
1-for-100
reverse stock split of our common stock that became effective on
July 18, 2011.
Principles
of Consolidation
The consolidated financial statements include our accounts and
our inactive, wholly-owned subsidiary, Insulated Connections
Corporation Limited. The subsidiary has been inactive since
2001. All inter-company balances and transactions have been
eliminated in consolidation.
Use of
Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with
generally accepted accounting principles requires management to
make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts
of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets
and liabilities at the dates of the financial statements. Actual
results may differ from those estimates.
Cash and
Cash Equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents consist of cash and short-term
investments with insignificant interest rate risk and original
maturities of 90 days or less.
Fair
Value of Financial Instruments
Substantially all of our financial instruments, consisting
primarily of cash, accounts receivable, accounts payable and
accrued expenses, other current liabilities and convertible
debentures, are carried at, or approximate, fair value because
of their short-term nature or because they carry market rates of
interest.
Stock-Based
Compensation
We account for stock-based compensation in accordance with
accounting guidance now codified as Financial Accounting
Standards Board (FASB) Accounting Standards
Codification (ASC) 718,
Compensation Stock
F-7
AMBIENT
CORPORATION
NOTES TO
AUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Compensation. Under the fair value recognition provision
of financial stock-based compensation cost is estimated at the
grant date based on the fair value of the award. We estimate the
fair value of stock options granted using the
Black-Scholes-Merton option pricing model.
Net Loss
per Share
Basic loss per share is computed by dividing net loss available
to common stockholders by the weighted-average number of common
shares outstanding during the period. Diluted loss per share
adjusts basic loss per share for the effects of convertible
securities, stock options and other potentially dilutive
instruments, only in the periods in which such effect is
dilutive. The following securities have been excluded from the
calculation of net loss per share, as their effect would be
anti-dilutive.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
2009
|
|
2010
|
|
Stock options
|
|
|
323,870
|
|
|
|
585,370
|
|
|
|
1,129,465
|
|
Warrants
|
|
|
1,292,167
|
|
|
|
788,278
|
|
|
|
1,559,688
|
|
Convertible debentures
|
|
|
8,333,333
|
|
|
|
6,666,667
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property
and Equipment
Equipment, furniture and fixtures are recorded at cost and
depreciated using the straight-line method over the estimated
useful lives of the assets, which range from one to five years.
Revenue
Recognition
Hardware sales consist of our smart grid communications nodes as
well as system software embedded in the communications nodes.
System software embedded in our communications nodes is used
solely in connection with the operation of the product. Upon the
sale and shipment of our products, we are not required to update
the embedded software for newer versions that are subsequently
developed. In addition, we do not offer or provide any free
post-contract customer support. There is an original warranty
period, which may run for a period of up to 12 months from
sale of product, in which we will provide fixes for the
communications nodes when and if appropriate. As such, we
recognize revenue from the sales of the Nodes upon delivery to
the customer.
Our proprietary software consists of the
AmbientNMS®,
a network management system that may be sold on a stand-alone
basis. A purchaser of our communications nodes is not required
to purchase this system as our communications nodes could be
managed with independently developed management software. The
sale of the
AmbientNMS®
does not include post-contract customer support, unless the
customer enters into a maintenance agreement with us. As such,
we recognize revenue from the sale of this software when
shipped. We classify amounts billed to customers before software
is shipped as deferred revenue.
We offer maintenance service on a fee basis that entitles the
purchasers of our communications nodes and Ambient
NMS®
software to benefits including telephone support, as well as
updates and upgrades to our products. We amortize such revenue,
when received over the appropriate period based on the terms of
individual agreements.
Accounts
Receivable
We record accounts receivable net of an allowance for doubtful
accounts based upon managements analysis of the
collectability of the balances. At December 31, 2009 and
2010, management believed that no allowance was necessary.
At December 31, 2009 and 2010, one customer accounted for
100% of accounts receivable. See Note 10.
F-8
AMBIENT
CORPORATION
NOTES TO
AUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Inventory
We value inventory at the lower of cost or market determined on
the
first-in,
first-out (FIFO) basis. Market, with respect to direct
materials, is replacement cost and is net realizable value for
finished goods. We adjust the value of the inventory for
estimated obsolescence or unmarketable inventory equal to the
difference between the cost of inventory and the estimated
market value based upon assumptions about future demand and
market conditions.
Research
and Development and Patent Costs
We expense both research and development costs and patent costs
to operations as incurred.
Software
Development Costs
We have historically expensed as incurred costs incurred in the
research and development of new software products and
enhancements to existing software products. After technological
feasibility is established, we capitalize additional development
costs. We have not capitalized any software development costs as
of December 31, 2009 and 2010.
Employees
We have a contract with Insperity (formerly known as
Administaff), which is a professional employer organization.
Pursuant to this contract, we and Insperity are co-employers of
our personnel. Insperity is responsible for paying the salaries
and wages of our personnel and providing our personnel with
health, dental and various other types of insurance and benefits
at favorable rates for which we would not otherwise qualify.
Insperity pays salaries and wages of our personnel directly from
our bank accounts, and we pay Insperity a fee for its services.
We record these payments using the same classifications as if we
made all payments directly to our personnel.
Income
Taxes
We account for income taxes in accordance with accounting
guidance now codified as FASB ASC 740, Income
Taxes, which requires that we recognize deferred tax
liabilities and assets based on the differences between the
financial statement carrying amounts and the tax bases of assets
and liabilities, using enacted tax rates in effect in the years
the differences are expected to reverse. Deferred income tax
benefit (expense) results from the change in net deferred tax
assets or deferred tax liabilities. We record a valuation
allowance when it is more likely than not that some or all
deferred tax assets will not be realized.
We have adopted the provisions of FASB
ASC 740-10-05,
Accounting for Uncertainties in Income Taxes. The
ASC clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes
recognized in an enterprises financial statements. The ASC
prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for
the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax
position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. The ASC
provides guidance on de-recognition, classification, interest
and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure and
transition.
Warranties
We account for our warranties under the FASB ASC 450
Contingencies. We generally warrant that our
products are free from defects in material and workmanship for a
period of one year from the date of initial acceptance by our
customers. The warranty does not cover any losses or damage that
occurs as a result of improper installation, misuse
F-9
AMBIENT
CORPORATION
NOTES TO
AUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
or neglect or repair or modification by anyone other than the
Company or our authorized repair agent. Our policy is to accrue
anticipated warranty costs based upon historical percentages of
items returned for repair within one year of the initial sale.
Our repair rate of products under warranty has been minimal so
that we have not established an historical percentage. We have
not provided for any reserves for such warranty liability.
Our software license agreements generally include certain
provisions for indemnifying customers against liabilities if our
software products infringe upon a third partys
intellectual property rights. We have not provided for any
reserves for such warranty liabilities.
Our software license agreements also generally include a
warranty that our software products will substantially operate
as described in the applicable program documentation. We also
warrant that we will perform services in a manner consistent
with industry standards. To date, we have not incurred any
material costs associated with these product and service
performance warranties, and as such we have not provided for any
reserves for any such warranty liabilities in our operating
results.
Impairment
of Long-Lived Assets
We review our long-lived assets for impairment whenever events
or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of
an asset may not be recoverable from future undiscounted cash
flows. We record impairment losses for the excess, if any, of
the carrying value over the fair value of the long-lived assets.
We did not record an impairment charge in 2009 and 2010.
Fair
Value Measurements
FASB ASC Topic 820, Fair Value Measurements and
Disclosures (ASC 820), defines fair value as
the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid
to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most
advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly
transaction between market participants on the measurement date.
ASC 820 also establishes a fair value hierarchy that
requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and
minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair
value. The standard describes three levels of inputs that may be
used to measure fair value:
Level 1 Quoted prices in active markets for
identical assets or liabilities.
Level 2 Observable inputs other than
Level 1 prices, such as quoted prices for similar assets or
liabilities; quoted prices in markets that are not active; or
other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by
observable market data for substantially the full term of the
assets or liabilities.
Level 3 Unobservable inputs that are supported
by little or no market activity and that are significant to the
fair value of the assets or liabilities.
Recently
Issued Accounting Pronouncements
The Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) ratified
Accounting Statement Update (ASU)
2009-13 (ASU
2009-13),
Revenue Recognition (Topic 605): Multiple-Deliverable
Revenue Arrangements, which eliminates the residual method
of allocation, and instead requires companies to use the
relative selling price method when allocating revenue in a
multiple deliverable arrangement. When applying the relative
selling price method, the selling price for each deliverable
shall be determined using vendor specific objective evidence of
selling price, if it exists and otherwise using third-party
evidence of selling price. If neither vendor specific objective
evidence nor third-party evidence of selling price exists for a
deliverable, companies shall use their best estimate of the
selling
F-10
AMBIENT
CORPORATION
NOTES TO
AUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
price for that deliverable when applying the relative selling
price method. ASU
2009-13
shall be effective in fiscal years beginning on or after
June 15, 2010, with earlier application permitted.
Companies may elect to adopt this guidance prospectively for all
revenue arrangements entered into or materially modified after
the date of adoption, or retrospectively for all periods
presented. We adopted this standard effective January 1,
2011. We do not expect the provisions of ASU
2009-13 to
have a material effect on our financial position, results of
operations or cash flows.
In April 2010, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update
2010-17 (ASU
2010-17),
Revenue
Recognition-Milestone
Method (Topic 605): Milestone Method of Revenue
Recognition. The amendments in this Update are effective
on a prospective basis for milestones achieved in fiscal years,
and interim periods within those years, beginning on or after
June 15, 2010. Early adoption is permitted. If a vendor
elects early adoption and the period of adoption is not the
beginning of the entitys fiscal year, the entity should
apply the amendments retrospectively from the beginning of the
year of adoption. We do not expect the provisions of ASU
2010-17 to
have a material effect on our financial position, results of
operations or cash flows.
Management does not believe that any other recently issued, but
not yet effective, accounting standard if currently adopted
would have a material effect on the accompanying audited
consolidated financial statements.
Inventory consisted of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Raw material
|
|
$
|
137
|
|
|
$
|
139
|
|
Finished goods
|
|
|
224
|
|
|
|
695
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
361
|
|
|
$
|
834
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOTE 4
|
PROPERTY
AND EQUIPMENT
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Computers
|
|
$
|
163
|
|
|
$
|
309
|
|
Software
|
|
|
368
|
|
|
|
505
|
|
Software (capital lease)
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
Machinery and equipment
|
|
|
539
|
|
|
|
627
|
|
Furniture and office equipment
|
|
|
161
|
|
|
|
196
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,261
|
|
|
|
1,667
|
|
Less accumulated depreciation
|
|
|
658
|
|
|
|
922
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
603
|
|
|
$
|
745
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation expense was $307,476, $302,871 and $380,256 for the
years ended December 31, 2008, 2009 and 2010, respectively.
F-11
AMBIENT
CORPORATION
NOTES TO
AUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
NOTE 5
|
ACCRUED
EXPENSES AND OTHER CURRENT LIABILITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Accrued interest
|
|
$
|
690
|
|
|
$
|
244
|
|
Accrued payroll and payroll taxes
|
|
|
83
|
|
|
|
139
|
|
Accrued professional fees
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
Accrued liabilities
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
218
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
829
|
|
|
$
|
633
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued interest represents amounts owed to Vicis Capital Master
Fund (Vicis) on secured convertible promissory
notes. See Note 7.
|
|
NOTE 6
|
CAPITAL
LEASE OBLIGATION
|
We lease software under a capital lease expiring in 2011. The
asset and liability under the capital lease are recorded at the
lower of the present value of the minimum lease payments or the
fair value of the asset. The asset is amortized over its
estimated productive life. Amortization of assets under capital
leases is included in depreciation expense.
Minimum future lease payments under capital leases as of
December 31, 2010 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Net minimum lease payments 2011
|
|
$
|
11
|
|
Amount representing interest
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Present value of net minimum lease payments
|
|
$
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The interest rate on the capitalized lease is 9.1%. Interest is
computed based on the lower of our incremental borrowing rate at
the inception of lease or the lessors implicit rate of
return.
|
|
NOTE 7
|
CONVERTIBLE
DEBT
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Secured Convertible Promissory Note payable interest
at 8%, due July 31, 2010(i)
|
|
$
|
7,500,000
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Secured Convertible Promissory Note payable interest
at 8%, due November 1, 2010(ii)
|
|
|
2,500,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
Secured Convertible Promissory Note payable interest
at 8%, due January 15, 2011 (iii)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
10,000,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: Discount
|
|
|
(183,609
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,816,391
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less Current Portion
|
|
|
9,816,391
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-12
AMBIENT
CORPORATION
NOTES TO
AUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Securities
Purchase Agreements
(i) On July 31, 2007, we entered into the Securities
Purchase Agreement (the July 07 Purchase Agreement)
with Vicis, pursuant to which Vicis purchased our Secured
Convertible Promissory Note in aggregate principal amount of
$7,500,000 (the July 07 Note). The July 07 Note had
a term of three years and was scheduled to become due on
July 31, 2010. The outstanding principal amount of the July
07 Note was convertible at the option of the holder into shares
of our common stock at an initial conversion price of $7.50 per
share, subject to certain adjustments. The conversion price was
adjusted to $1.50 in connection with the various Agreements
discussed below. Amounts owing under the July 07 Note were
secured by substantially all of our assets. In January 2010, the
July 07 Note was converted into 5,000,000 shares of common
stock.
Pursuant to the July 07 Purchase Agreement, we issued common
stock purchase warrants (the July 07 Warrants) to
Vicis, exercisable through July 31, 2012, to purchase up to
1,500,000 shares of common stock at original exercise
prices between of $6.00 and $7.50 per share. The exercise prices
were adjusted to $0.10 in connection with the April 08 Purchase
Agreement discussed below. All of the July 07 Warrants were
exercised on November 24, 2008.
In connection with this financing, we paid fees to a registered
broker dealer of $570,000 and issued warrants to purchase up to
173,500 shares of our common stock at a per share exercise
price of $3.50 for 166,000 shares and $7.50 for
7,500 shares.
For financial reporting purposes, we recorded a discount of
$3,959,362 to reflect the value of the warrants and an
additional discount of $2,310,886 to reflect the beneficial
conversion feature of the July 07 Note. The estimated value of
the warrants was determined using the Black-Scholes option
pricing model under the following weighted average assumptions:
life of 5 years, risk free interest rate of 4.88%, a
dividend yield of 0% and volatility of 130.22%. The discounts
were being amortized to the date of maturity unless converted
earlier. As discussed below, we and Vicis entered into a
Debenture Amendment Agreement. As a result, all of the remaining
unamortized discounts were expensed in 2008.
(ii) On November 1, 2007, we entered into a Securities
Purchase Agreement (the November 07 Purchase
Agreement) with Vicis pursuant to which Vicis purchased
our Secured Convertible Promissory Note in the principal amount
of $2,500,000 (the November 07 Note). The November
07 Note had a term of three years and was scheduled to become
due on November 1, 2010. The outstanding principal amount
of the November 07 Note was convertible at the option of the
holder into shares of common stock at an initial conversion
price of $4.50 per share. In connection with the Debenture
Amendment Agreement discussed below, the conversion price was
adjusted to $1.50 per share. Amounts owing under the November 07
Note were secured by substantially all of our assets. In January
2010, the November 07 Note was converted into
1,666,667 shares of common stock.
In connection with the issuance of the November 07 Note, we
issued common stock purchase warrants (the November 07
Warrants) to Vicis, exercisable through October 31,
2012, to purchase up to 833,333 shares of common stock at
original exercise prices between $4.50 per share and $5.00. The
exercise prices were adjusted to $0.10 in connection with the
April 08 Purchase Agreement discussed below. All of the November
07 Warrants were exercised on November 24, 2008.
For financial reporting purposes, we recorded a discount of
$1,127,634 to reflect the value of the November 07 Warrants and
an additional discount of $294,301 to reflect the beneficial
conversion feature of November 07 Note. The estimated value of
the warrants was determined using the Black-Scholes option
pricing model under the following weighted average assumptions:
life of 5 years, risk free interest rate of 3.67%, a
dividend yield of 0% and volatility of 127.4%. The discounts
were being amortized to the date of maturity unless converted
earlier. As
F-13
AMBIENT
CORPORATION
NOTES TO
AUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
discussed below, we and Vicis entered into a Debenture Amendment
Agreement. As a result, all of the remaining unamortized
discounts were expensed in 2008.
(iii) On January 15, 2008, we entered into a
Securities Purchase Agreement (the January 2008 Purchase
Agreement) with Vicis pursuant to which Vicis purchased
our Secured Convertible Promissory Note in the principal amount
of $2,500,000 (the January 08 Note; together with
the November 07 Note and the July 07 Note, the
Notes). The January 08 Note had a term of three
years and was scheduled to become due on January 15, 2011.
The outstanding principal amount of the January 08 Note was
convertible at the option of the holder into shares of common
stock at an initial conversion price of $3.50 per share. In
connection with the Debenture Amendment Agreement discussed
below, the conversion price was adjusted to $1.50 per share.
Amounts owing under the January 08 Note were secured by
substantially all of our assets. In August 2009, the January 08
Note was converted into 1,666,667 shares of common stock.
In connection with the issuance of the January 08 Note, we
issued common stock purchase warrants (the January 08
Warrants) to Vicis, exercisable through January 15,
2013, to purchase up to 1,071,429 shares of common stock at
an original exercise price of $3.50 per share. The exercise
price was adjusted to $0.10 in connection with the April 08
Purchase Agreement discussed below. All of the January 08
Warrants were exercised on November 24, 2008.
In connection with the financing, we issued, as compensation to
a registered broker dealer, warrants to purchase up to
149,999 shares of our common stock at a per share exercise
price of $3.50.
For financial reporting purposes, we recorded a discount of
$1,459,189 to reflect the value of the warrants and an
additional discount of $1,040,811 to reflect the beneficial
conversion feature of January 08 Note. The estimated value of
the warrants was determined using the Black-Scholes option
pricing model under the following weighted average assumptions:
life of 5 years, risk free interest rate of 3%, a dividend
yield of 0% and volatility of 127.4%. The discounts were being
amortized to the date of maturity unless converted earlier. As
discussed below, we and Vicis entered into a Debenture Amendment
Agreement. As a result, all of the remaining unamortized
discounts were expensed in 2008.
We determined and adjusted the amount of accrued interest owed
to Vicis after the notes were converted as discussed above. For
the year ended December 31, 2010, we recorded a gain on the
conversion of the debentures totaling $251,840. Such gain
represents the reversal of accrued interest recorded in previous
periods.
At December 31, 2009 and 2010, accrued interest owed to
Vicis amounted to $690,027 and $244,262, respectively. See
Note 5.
Debt
Modification
On November 21, 2008, we and Vicis entered into a Debenture
Amendment Agreement (the Debenture Amendment
Agreement), pursuant to which Vicis invested in us an
additional $8 million. In consideration of the investment,
we reduced the conversion price on the Notes referred to above
to $1.50 per share. We and Vicis also agreed that in the event
that on the trading day immediately preceding June 1, 2009,
the closing per share price of the common stock was less than
$10.00, then the per share conversion price with respect to any
amount then outstanding under the Notes would automatically be
further adjusted to $1.00. The price of the common stock was
greater than $10.00 on the trading day immediately preceding
June 1, 2009, and therefore no further adjustment of the
conversion price was effected.
We accounted for the modification of the Convertible Promissory
Notes, as described above, as an extinguishment of debt. We
deemed the terms of the amendment to be substantially different
and treated the
F-14
AMBIENT
CORPORATION
NOTES TO
AUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Convertible Promissory Notes as extinguished and exchanged for
new notes. As such, it was necessary to reflect the Convertible
Promissory Notes at fair market value and record a loss on
extinguishment of debt of approximately $2.8 million.
The fair value of the Convertible Promissory Notes was
determined utilizing Level 3 inputs. The fair value of the
Convertible Promissory Notes was calculated utilizing the fully
diluted market value of our invested capital immediately before
and after the date of the debt modification. The fair value was
determined to be the face value of the Notes at the date of the
debt modification.
For financial reporting purposes, we recorded an initial
discount of $12,500,000, based upon a conversion price of $1.00
to reflect the beneficial conversion feature related to the
Debenture Modification Agreement. The discount was being
amortized to the date of maturity of the various Notes unless
converted earlier. On June 1, 2009, the beneficial
conversion feature was re-measured based on the final conversion
price being set at $1.50. This resulted in a reduction in the
initial value of the beneficial conversion feature of $8,333,333
and a like reduction to additional paid-in capital.
Interest incurred on the Notes amounted to $671,461, $614,827
and $28,296 for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2009 and
2010, respectively.
On June 30, 2009, we agreed to modify the terms of the
expiring Class A warrants. Under the new terms the warrants
were exercisable through August 31, 2009 and the exercise
prices were reduced from $20.00 to $15.00 per share. The
resulting charge due to the modification was $1,147,167 and is
reflected as additional interest expense in the year ended
December 31, 2009. As a result of the debt conversions of
the July 07 Note and the January 08 Note in January 2010, the
unamortized debt discounts totaling $183,609 were charged to
interest expense in fiscal 2010. Amortization of the discounts
related to the Notes totaled $2,482,288, $3,228,600 and $183,609
for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2009 and 2010.
|
|
NOTE 8
|
STOCKHOLDERS
EQUITY
|
Security
Purchase Agreement
On November 16, 2009, we and Vicis entered into an
agreement, which was subsequently amended in January 2010,
pursuant to which Vicis furnished to us access to a $8,000,000
equity based credit line. Pursuant to the arrangement, Vicis
deposited into an escrow account $8,000,000. From time to time
as our cash resources fell below $1,500,000 (the
Cash Balance Condition Precedent), we were
entitled to receive $500,000 from the account in consideration
of which we would issue to Vicis 50,000 shares of common
stock and warrants for a corresponding number of shares of
common stock. Between January 19 and December 29, 2010, we
effected six draw-downs in the amount of the $3,000,000 and
issued 300,000 shares of our common stock.
On December 30, 2010, we and Vicis further amended the
arrangement described above (2nd amendment)
pursuant to which Vicis applied the $5 million then
remaining in the escrow account to the purchase of Company
securities (the Investment). Vicis made the
Investment despite the fact that the Cash Balance Condition
Precedent had not been met. In consideration of the Investment,
we issued to Vicis 500,000 shares of our common stock as
well as Series G Warrants to purchase, over a two year
period from the date of issuance, an additional
500,000 share of common stock. Under the terms of the
2nd Amendment, the per share exercise price of the
Series G Warrants issuable in connection with the
Investment was set at $20.00 (rather than the $25.00 per share
exercise price provided under the original terms of the
agreement).
F-15
AMBIENT
CORPORATION
NOTES TO
AUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Stock
Option Plans
In November 2000, we adopted the 2000 Equity Incentive Plan. The
2000 Equity Incentive Plan provides for the grant of incentive
stock options, nonqualified stock options, stock appreciation
rights, restricted stock, bonus stock, awards in lieu of cash
obligations, other stock-based awards and performance units. The
2000 Equity Incentive Plan also permits cash payments under
certain conditions. As of December 31, 2007, the number of
shares of common stock reserved for issuance under the 2000
Incentive Plan was 250,000. On June 27, 2008, the number of
shares reserved for issuance was further increased to
500,000 shares. On February 4, 2010, the number of
shares reserved for issuance was further increased to
1,100,000 shares.
The compensation committee of the board of directors is
responsible for determining the type of award, when and to whom
awards are granted, the number of shares and the terms of the
awards and exercise prices. The options are exercisable for a
period not to exceed ten years from the date of grant. Vesting
periods range from immediately to four years.
In December 2002, we adopted the 2002 Non-Employee Directors
Stock Option Plan (the 2002 Directors Plan)
providing for the issuance of shares of common stock to
non-employee directors. Under the 2002 Directors Plan, only
non-qualified options may be issued, and they will be
exercisable for a period of six years from the date of grant. As
of December 31, 2007, the number of shares of common stock
reserved for issuance under the 2002 Directors Plan was
60,000 shares. On June 27, 2008, the number of shares
reserved for issuance was increased to 120,000 shares. On
February 4, 2010, the number of shares of common stock
reserved for issuance was further increased to
250,000 shares.
Employee
Options
In January and February 2010, we issued options to employees
from the 2000 Equity Incentive Plan to purchase up to a total of
2,000 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of
$15.00. The options will be fully vested as of December 1,
2011.
In February and March 2010, we issued a total of
2,250 shares of common stock upon the exercise of stock
options previously issued to employees from the 2000 Equity
Incentive Plan.
In February, 2011, we issued options to employees from the 2000
Equity Incentive Plan to purchase up to a total of
3,000 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of
$10.00 per share. The options will be fully vested as of
February 15, 2013.
Other
Option Grants (2008)
In addition to the options granted under the stock option plans
discussed above (the Plans), we have issued options
outside of the Plans, pursuant to various employment, consulting
and separation agreements.
F-16
AMBIENT
CORPORATION
NOTES TO
AUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Option activity for 2008, 2009 and 2010 is summarized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise
|
|
|
|
Plan
|
|
|
Non-plan
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Price
|
|
|
Options outstanding, January 1, 2008
|
|
|
285,870
|
|
|
|
37,220
|
|
|
|
32,307
|
|
|
$
|
25.00
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
17,000
|
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
|
|
19,000
|
|
|
|
3.00
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
(16,750
|
)
|
|
|
(1,450
|
)
|
|
|
18,200
|
|
|
|
16.00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options outstanding, December 31, 2008
|
|
|
286,120
|
|
|
|
37,750
|
|
|
|
323,870
|
|
|
|
17.00
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
274,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
274,500
|
|
|
|
4.00
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(7,500
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,500
|
)
|
|
|
6.00
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
(4,000
|
)
|
|
|
(1,500
|
)
|
|
|
(5,500
|
)
|
|
|
13.00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options outstanding, December 31, 2009
|
|
|
549,120
|
|
|
|
36,250
|
|
|
|
585,370
|
|
|
|
11.00
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
581,450
|
|
|
|
15,000
|
|
|
|
596,450
|
|
|
|
10.40
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(8,110
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8,110
|
)
|
|
|
4.00
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
(44,245
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(44,245
|
)
|
|
|
13.00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options outstanding, December 31, 2010
|
|
|
1,078,215
|
|
|
|
51,250
|
|
|
|
1,129,465
|
|
|
$
|
11.40
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares of Common Stock available for future grant under the plans
|
|
|
240,166
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aggregate intrinsic value
|
|
$
|
2,268,461
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The aggregate intrinsic value was calculated based on the
positive difference between the closing market price of common
stock and the exercise price of the underlying options.
The following table summarizes information about stock options
outstanding at December 31, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average
|
|
|
Options Exercisable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remaining
|
|
|
Weighted Average
|
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
Contractual
|
|
|
Exercise
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
Exercise
|
|
Exercise Price Range
|
|
Outstanding
|
|
|
Life
|
|
|
Price
|
|
|
Exercisable
|
|
|
Price
|
|
|
$ 3.00 $ 5.00
|
|
|
350,815
|
|
|
|
6.92
|
|
|
$
|
3.80
|
|
|
|
350,815
|
|
|
$
|
3.80
|
|
$ 6.00 $ 9.50
|
|
|
3,000
|
|
|
|
8.64
|
|
|
|
8.30
|
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
|
6.00
|
|
$10.00 $12.00
|
|
|
581,900
|
|
|
|
8.77
|
|
|
|
12.00
|
|
|
|
68,454
|
|
|
|
11.90
|
|
$15.00 $20.00
|
|
|
160,750
|
|
|
|
2.95
|
|
|
|
19.80
|
|
|
|
158,500
|
|
|
|
19.80
|
|
$25.00 $30.00
|
|
|
10,750
|
|
|
|
4.51
|
|
|
|
27.90
|
|
|
|
10,750
|
|
|
|
27.90
|
|
$50.00
|
|
|
22,250
|
|
|
|
1.54
|
|
|
|
50.00
|
|
|
|
22,250
|
|
|
|
50.00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ 3.00 $50.00
|
|
|
1,129,465
|
|
|
|
7.18
|
|
|
$
|
11.40
|
|
|
|
611,769
|
|
|
$
|
10.90
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share based compensation The fair values of stock
options granted were estimated using the Black-Scholes
option-pricing model with the following assumptions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
2009
|
|
2010
|
|
Risk free interest rate
|
|
|
1.45%-1.87%
|
|
|
|
1.07%-2.66%
|
|
|
|
0.85%-2.38%
|
|
Expected life
|
|
|
1.5-5.75
|
|
|
|
3.5-5.75
|
|
|
|
3.5-5.75
|
|
Expected volatility
|
|
|
133%-162%
|
|
|
|
162%-169%
|
|
|
|
155%-168%
|
|
Dividend yield
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average grant date fair value per share
|
|
$
|
1.90
|
|
|
$
|
3.50
|
|
|
$
|
10.40
|
|
F-17
AMBIENT
CORPORATION
NOTES TO
AUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
As of December 31, 2010, there was $5,387,846 of
unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested options
granted. That cost is expected to be recognized over a
weighted-average period of 19.2 months.
Warrants
On April 23, 2008, we entered into a Securities Purchase
Agreement (the April 08 Purchase Agreement) with
Vicis pursuant to which we issued, in consideration of an
investment of $3,000,000, warrants (the April 2008
Warrants), exercisable through April 2013, to purchase up
to 1,350,000 shares of our common stock, at a per share
exercise price of $0.10.
In connection with the financing, a registered broker dealer
received $45,000 as compensation payment and was issued warrants
to purchase up to 10,000 shares of our common stock at a
per share exercise price of $3.50.
On November 24, 2008, we issued 4,643,651 shares of
our common stock to Vicis upon its exercise of all outstanding
Investor Warrants through a combination of cashless
exercises as well as for cash exercises. We
received cash proceeds of $242,143 from the cash exercises.
In March 2010, we issued 21,440 shares of common stock upon
the exercise of finder warrants previously issued in connection
with the July 2007 financing.
A summary of the warrants outstanding at December 31, 2010
is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise
|
|
Expiration
|
Warrants
|
|
Price
|
|
Date
|
|
384,522
|
|
$
|
3.50
|
|
|
2012 - 2013
|
7,500
|
|
$
|
7.50
|
|
|
2012
|
500,000
|
|
$
|
20.00
|
|
|
2012
|
667,667
|
|
$
|
25.00
|
|
|
2011 - 2012
|
In February 2011, we issued 4,500 shares of common stock
upon the exercise of finder warrants previously issued from an
April 2008 funding.
Warrant
Modification
In May 2006, we raised net proceeds of $8.986 million in a
private placement of $10,000,000 in principal amount of our
two-year 8% Convertible Debentures (the 2006
Debentures). We repaid the balance in its entirety by
January 2008. Investors in the private placement also received
Class A warrants, exercisable through June 30, 2009,
to purchase up to 333,333 shares of our common stock at a
per share exercise price of $20.00 and Class B warrants,
exercisable through June 30, 2011, to purchase up to
333,333 shares of our common stock at a per share exercise
price of $25.00.
In connection with the placement of the 2006 Debentures, we
issued to a registered broker dealer that acted as placement
agent warrants consisting of (x) warrants to purchase an
aggregate of 66,667 shares of common stock having an
initial exercise price equal to $15.00, (y) warrants to
purchase an aggregate of 33,333 shares of common stock
having an initial exercise price equal to $20.00, and
(z) warrants to purchase an aggregate of 33,333 shares
of common stock having an initial exercise price equal to
$25.00. Except as specifically noted, these warrants otherwise
are on substantially the same terms and conditions as the
investor warrants.
F-18
AMBIENT
CORPORATION
NOTES TO
AUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
On June 30, 2009, we modified the terms of the expiring
Class A warrants. Under the new terms, the warrants were
exercisable though August 31, 2009 and the exercise prices
were reduced from $20.00 to $15.00 per share. We valued the
warrant modification at $1,147,167 using the Black-Scholes
pricing model and the following assumptions: contractual term of
0.167 years, an average risk-free interest rate of 0.19% a
dividend yield of 0% and volatility of 93%. The resulting of
$1,147,167 is reflected in the Statement of Operations for 2009
as interest expense.
Following the modification, Class A warrants for an
aggregate of 62,833 shares of our common stock were
exercised for total net cash exercise proceeds of $848,250
through August 31, 2009, and 303,833 Class A warrants
expired.
At December 31, 2010, we had available $77 million of
net operating loss carryforwards, for U.S. income tax
purposes which expire in the years 2016 through 2029. However,
due to changes in stock ownership, the use of the U.S. net
operating loss carryforwards is severely limited under
Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code. As such,
approximately $61 million of these net operating loss
carryforwards will expire as worthless. We have ceased our
foreign operations and have abandoned the foreign net operating
loss carryforwards.
Due to the uncertainty of their realization, we have not
recorded any income tax benefit for these loss carryforwards as
valuation allowances have been established for any such benefits.
Significant components of our deferred tax assets for
U.S. income taxes are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Net operating loss carryforwards
|
|
$
|
2,735
|
|
|
$
|
6,568
|
|
|
$
|
6,828
|
|
Stock-based compensation
|
|
|
356
|
|
|
|
735
|
|
|
|
1,025
|
|
Other
|
|
|
555
|
|
|
|
584
|
|
|
|
615
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred tax assets
|
|
|
3,646
|
|
|
|
7,887
|
|
|
|
8,468
|
|
Valuation allowance
|
|
|
(3,646
|
)
|
|
|
(7,887
|
)
|
|
|
(8,468
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred tax assets
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The increase in the valuation allowance was due to the increases
in the items in the table above.
The following is a reconciliation of the federal statutory tax
rate of 35% for 2008, 2009 and 2010, with the provision for
income taxes:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Statutory tax rate
|
|
|
(35
|
)%
|
|
|
(35
|
)%
|
|
|
(35
|
)%
|
Valuation allowance
|
|
|
35
|
%
|
|
|
35
|
%
|
|
|
35
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effective federal tax rate
|
|
|
0
|
%
|
|
|
0
|
%
|
|
|
0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2008, 2009 and 2010, we had no material
unrecognized tax benefits, and no adjustments to liabilities or
operations were required. We do not expect that our unrecognized
tax benefits will materially increase within the next
12 months. We did not recognize any interest or penalties
related to uncertain tax positions at December 31, 2008,
2009 and 2010.
F-19
AMBIENT
CORPORATION
NOTES TO
AUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
We file U.S. and state income tax returns in jurisdictions
with varying statutes of limitations. The 2006 through 2010 tax
years generally remain subject to examination by federal and
most state tax authorities.
Cash
Cash is maintained with major financial institutions in the
United States. At December 31, 2008, 2009 and 2010, no
amounts were in excess of insured amounts.
Sales and
Major Customers
Revenue for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2009 and
2010 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Hardware
|
|
$
|
12,136
|
|
|
$
|
2,128
|
|
|
$
|
20,283
|
|
Software and services
|
|
|
486
|
|
|
|
65
|
|
|
|
75
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
12,622
|
|
|
$
|
2,193
|
|
|
$
|
20,358
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Duke Energy accounted for 100% of hardware, software and
services revenue for the years ended December 31, 2008,
2009 and 2010, respectively.
Major
Supplier
In 2008, 2009 and 2010, we used one contract manufacturer to
produce our communications nodes. Should our relationship with
the manufacturer deteriorate or terminate or should this
supplier lose some or all of its access to the products or
components that comprise all or part of the communications nodes
that we purchase from it, our performance could be adversely
affected. Under such circumstances, we would be required to seek
alternative sources of supply for these products, and there can
be no assurance that we would be able to obtain such products
from alternative sources on the same terms. A failure to obtain
such products on as favorable terms would have an adverse effect
on our revenue
and/or gross
margin.
|
|
NOTE 11
|
OPERATING
LEASES
|
We do not own any real property. Our corporate office in
Newton, Massachusetts consists of two floors comprised of
approximately 20,242 square feet. The lease term for the
premises was scheduled to commence on September 1, 2009 and
continues through December 31, 2012. At our request, the
landlord agreed that we could commence the lease earlier, and we
completed the move into our new headquarters in August 2009.
The lease provides for an initial period of the lease to be rent
free and includes scheduled rent escalations. Accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America
require that the total rent expense to be incurred over the term
of the lease be recognized on a straight-line basis. Deferred
rent represents the cumulative excess of the straight-line
expense over the payments made. The average annual rent expense
over the term of the lease is approximately $304,000.
Rent expense for 2008, 2009 and 2010 was $233,315, $290,430 and
$304,000, respectively.
F-20
AMBIENT
CORPORATION
NOTES TO
AUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Future minimum annual rentals through 2012 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
2011
|
|
$
|
390
|
|
2012
|
|
|
404
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
794
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOTE 12
|
SUBSEQUENT
EVENTS
|
The Company reviewed subsequent events through the date of this
filing.
F-21
AMBIENT
CORPORATION
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except share and per share data)
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
6,987
|
|
|
$
|
12,545
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
1,731
|
|
|
|
478
|
|
Inventory
|
|
|
834
|
|
|
|
2,452
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
|
|
|
276
|
|
|
|
274
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
9,828
|
|
|
|
15,749
|
|
Fixed assets, net
|
|
|
745
|
|
|
|
1,049
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
10,573
|
|
|
$
|
16,798
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and stockholders equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
$
|
3,608
|
|
|
$
|
4,630
|
|
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities (including
related party interest of $0 and $244,262 respectively)
|
|
|
633
|
|
|
|
696
|
|
Deferred revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
107
|
|
Income taxes payable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
109
|
|
Capital lease obligations, current portion
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
4,251
|
|
|
|
5,546
|
|
Non-current Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred rent
|
|
|
186
|
|
|
|
143
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
$
|
4,437
|
|
|
$
|
5,689
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $.001 par value; 20,000,000 and
100,000,000 shares authorized; 16,493,764 and 16,532,228
issued; 16,483,764 and 16,522,228 outstanding, respectively
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
149,748
|
|
|
|
151,190
|
|
Accumulated deficit
|
|
|
(143,428
|
)
|
|
|
(139,897
|
)
|
Less: treasury stock; 10,000 shares at cost
|
|
|
(200
|
)
|
|
|
(200
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
$
|
6,136
|
|
|
$
|
11,109
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity
|
|
$
|
10,573
|
|
|
$
|
16,798
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements.
F-22
AMBIENT
CORPORATION
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
Total revenue
|
|
$
|
6,258
|
|
|
$
|
27,993
|
|
Cost of goods sold
|
|
|
3,782
|
|
|
|
15,963
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
2,476
|
|
|
|
12,030
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research and development expenses
|
|
|
2,975
|
|
|
|
4,893
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
2,305
|
|
|
|
3,507
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
5,280
|
|
|
|
8,400
|
|
Operating (loss) income
|
|
|
(2,804
|
)
|
|
|
3,630
|
|
Interest and finance expense
|
|
|
(213
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
Interest income
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) income before income taxes
|
|
|
(3,017
|
)
|
|
|
3,642
|
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
109
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income
|
|
$
|
(3,017
|
)
|
|
$
|
3,533
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income per share (basic)
|
|
$
|
(0.20
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.21
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income per share (diluted)
|
|
$
|
(0.20
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.21
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares used in computing basic net (loss)
income per share
|
|
|
15,022
|
|
|
|
16,496
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares used in computing diluted net (loss)
income per share
|
|
|
15,022
|
|
|
|
16,936
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements.
F-23
AMBIENT
CORPORATION
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Cash flows from operating activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income
|
|
$
|
(3,017
|
)
|
|
$
|
3,533
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net (loss) income to net cash provided
by (used in) operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
182
|
|
|
|
206
|
|
Amortization of beneficial conversion feature of convertible debt
|
|
|
184
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-based compensation
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
1,306
|
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivables
|
|
|
748
|
|
|
|
1,253
|
|
Inventory
|
|
|
(271
|
)
|
|
|
(1,618
|
)
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
117
|
|
|
|
1,022
|
|
Deferred rent
|
|
|
75
|
|
|
|
(43
|
)
|
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities
|
|
|
96
|
|
|
|
63
|
|
Income taxes payable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
109
|
|
Deferred revenue
|
|
|
(121
|
)
|
|
|
107
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities
|
|
|
(1,969
|
)
|
|
|
5,940
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of property and equipment
|
|
|
(264
|
)
|
|
|
(511
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities
|
|
|
(264
|
)
|
|
|
(511
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of common stock
|
|
|
2,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from exercise of warrants
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
106
|
|
Proceeds from exercise of options
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
Payments of capitalized lease obligations
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by financing activities
|
|
|
2,620
|
|
|
|
129
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
387
|
|
|
|
5,558
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents beginning of period
|
|
|
987
|
|
|
|
6,987
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents end of period
|
|
$
|
1,374
|
|
|
$
|
12,545
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-cash financing and investing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of common stock in connection with conversion of debt
|
|
$
|
10,000
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental cash flow information:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest paid
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
246
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements.
F-24
AMBIENT
CORPORATION
|
|
NOTE 1
|
BASIS OF
PRESENTATION
|
The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements of
Ambient Corporation and its subsidiary (collectively, the
Company, we or our) have
been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States of America (GAAP) for
interim financial information and with
Article 8-03
of
Regulation S-X.
Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and
notes required by GAAP for complete financial statements. In our
opinion, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring
accruals) considered necessary for a fair presentation have been
included. Operating results for the six months ended
June 30, 2011 are not necessarily indicative of the results
that may be expected for the year ending December 31, 2011.
These unaudited consolidated financial statements should be read
in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial
statements and notes thereto included elsewhere in this
prospectus.
We are a leading provider of a smart grid communications
platform that enables utilities to effectively deploy, integrate
and communicate with multiple smart grid applications within the
electrical power distribution grid. The Ambient Smart
Grid®
communications platform, which includes hardware, software and
firmware, today enables the simultaneous integration and
parallel communication of multiple smart grid applications
provided by a variety of vendors, including smart metering,
demand response and distribution automation.
Our long-standing relationship with Duke Energy, which has one
of the most forward-looking smart grid investment initiatives in
North America, has led to rapid growth in our business. We
entered into a long-term agreement in September 2009 with Duke
Energy, currently our sole customer, to supply Duke Energy our
Ambient Smart
Grid®
communications nodes and license our
AmbientNMS®
through 2015.
On July 18, 2011, we effected a reverse stock split of our
outstanding shares of common stock at a ratio of
1-for-100 shares
and reduced the number of authorized shares of common stock that
the we are authorized to issue from time to time to
100,000,000 shares.
|
|
NOTE 2
|
RECENTLY
ISSUED ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
|
On January 1, 2011, we adopted Accounting Statement Update
(ASU)
2009-13 (ASU
2009-13),
Revenue Recognition (Topic 605):
Multiple-Deliverable Revenue Arrangements, which
eliminates the residual method of allocation, and instead
requires companies to use the relative selling price method when
allocating revenue in a multiple deliverable arrangement. When
applying the relative selling price method, the selling price
for each deliverable shall be determined using vendor specific
objective evidence of selling price, if it exists and otherwise
using third-party evidence of selling price. If neither vendor
specific objective evidence nor third-party evidence of selling
price exists for a deliverable, companies shall use their best
estimate of the selling price for that deliverable when applying
the relative selling price method. We have elected to adopt this
guidance prospectively for all revenue arrangements entered into
or materially modified after the date of adoption. Our adoption
of ASU
2009-13 did
not have a material effect on our financial position, results of
operations or cash flows.
On January 1, 2011, we adopted ASU
2010-17 (ASU
2010-17),
Revenue
Recognition-Milestone
Method (Topic 605): Milestone Method of Revenue
Recognition. The amendments in this update are effective
on a prospective basis for milestones achieved in fiscal 2011
and thereafter. Our adoption of ASU
2010-17 did
not have a material effect on our financial position, results of
operations or cash flows.
We do not believe that any other recently issued, but not yet
effective, accounting standard if currently adopted would have a
material effect on the accompanying consolidated financial
statements.
F-25
AMBIENT
CORPORATION
NOTES TO
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
NOTE 3
|
FAIR
VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
|
Substantially all of our financial instruments, consisting
primarily of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable,
accounts payable, accrued expenses and other current
liabilities, are carried at, or approximate, fair value because
of their short-term nature.
NOTE 4
STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION
The following table presents stock-based compensation expense
included in our consolidated statements of operations for the
six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2011:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
Cost of goods sold
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
56
|
|
Research and development expenses
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
439
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
$
|
18
|
|
|
$
|
811
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stock-based compensation
|
|
$
|
35
|
|
|
$
|
1,306
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOTE 5
|
NET
INCOME (LOSS) PER SHARE
|
Basic earnings per share are computed based on the
weighted-average number of shares of our common stock
outstanding. Diluted earnings per share are computed based on
the weighted-average number of shares of our common stock,
including common stock equivalents outstanding. Certain common
shares consisting of stock options and warrants that would have
an anti-dilutive effect were not included in the diluted
earnings per share attributable to common stockholders for the
six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2011.
The following is a reconciliation of the denominators of the
basic and diluted earnings per share computations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
Denominators:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average shares outstanding used to compute basic
earnings per share
|
|
|
15,022
|
|
|
|
16,496
|
|
Effect of dilutive stock options and warrants
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
440
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average shares outstanding and dilutive securities used
to compute dilutive earnings per share
|
|
|
15,022
|
|
|
|
16,936
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2011, there were
approximately 1.6 million shares of outstanding potential
common stock equivalents, respectively, which were excluded from
the computation of diluted earnings per share because the effect
would have been anti-dilutive. These potential dilutive common
stock equivalents may be dilutive to future diluted earnings per
share.
F-26
AMBIENT
CORPORATION
NOTES TO
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
NOTE 6
|
SALES AND
MAJOR CUSTOMER
|
Total revenue for the six months ended June 30, 2010 and
2011 was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
Products
|
|
$
|
6,220
|
|
|
$
|
27,911
|
|
Software maintenance
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
|
82
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue
|
|
$
|
6,258
|
|
|
$
|
27,993
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Duke Energy accounted for 100% of the product and software
maintenance revenue for the 2010 and 2011 periods and 100% of
the accounts receivable balance at December 31, 2010 and
June 30, 2011.
Inventory is valued at the lower of cost or market and is
determined on
first-in-first-out
method (FIFO) basis. Market is determined as replacement cost
for direct materials and the net realizable value for finished
goods. Finished primarily consists of shipments in transit which
represent the cost of finished goods inventory shipped for which
title has not yet passed to our customer. We adjust the value of
our inventory for estimated obsolescence or unmarketable
inventory equal to the difference between the cost of inventory
and the estimated market value based upon assumptions about
future demand and market conditions. Inventory consisted of the
following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
Raw materials
|
|
$
|
139
|
|
|
$
|
322
|
|
Finished goods
|
|
|
695
|
|
|
|
2,130
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
834
|
|
|
$
|
2,452
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The provision for income taxes at June 30, 2011 was
comprised of federal alternative minimum tax.
Significant components of deferred tax assets include net
operating loss carryforwards and stock-based compensation. Due
to the uncertainty of their realization, we have not recorded
any income tax benefit as we have established valuation
allowances for any such benefits.
|
|
NOTE 9
|
STOCKHOLDERS
EQUITY
|
Employee
Stock Options
For the six months ended June 30, 2011, we issued a total
of 46,500 stock options from our 2000 Equity Incentive Plan at
exercise prices between $8.50 and $10.00 per share, and we
issued a total of 8,250 shares of our common stock upon the
exercise of stock options for total proceeds of $30,375.
Additionally, in July and August 2011, we issued a total of
33,250 stock options from our 2000 Equity Incentive Plan at
exercise prices between $10.40 and $11.75 per share.
F-27
AMBIENT
CORPORATION
NOTES TO
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Warrant
Exercises
For the six months ended June 30, 2011, we issued
30,214 shares of common stock upon the exercise of warrants
for total proceeds of $105,750. Additionally, in July 2011, we
issued 10,000 shares of common stock upon the exercise of
warrants for total proceeds of $35,000.
As of June 30, 2011, we had 1,161,807 warrants outstanding
with a weighted average exercise price of approximately $16.18
per share, of which approximately 955,033 are held by Vicis with
a weighted average exercise price of approximately $18.89 per
share.
|
|
NOTE 10
|
SUBSEQUENT
EVENTS
|
On August 3, 2011, our common stock was listed on the
NASDAQ Capital Market under the symbol AMBT.
F-28
Shares
Common Stock
PROSPECTUS
,
2011
Stifel Nicolaus
Weisel
Needham & Company,
LLC
ThinkEquity LLC
PART II
INFORMATION NOT REQUIRED IN PROSPECTUS
|
|
ITEM 13.
|
OTHER
EXPENSES OF ISSUANCE AND DISTRIBUTION
|
The following table sets forth the costs and expenses, other
than the underwriting discount, payable by the Company in
connection with the sale of the shares offered hereby. All
amounts shown are estimates except for the SEC and FINRA filing
fees.
|
|
|
|
|
SEC filing fee
|
|
$
|
6,675.75
|
|
FINRA filing fee
|
|
|
6,250.00
|
|
Legal fees and expenses
|
|
|
|
*
|
Accounting fees and expenses
|
|
|
|
*
|
Printing and engraving expenses
|
|
|
|
*
|
Miscellaneous expenses
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
To be completed by amendment. |
|
|
ITEM 14.
|
INDEMNIFICATION
OF DIRECTORS AND OFFICERS
|
Section 145 of the General Corporation Law of the State of
Delaware (the Delaware Corporation Law) empowers a
Delaware corporation to indemnify any person who was or is a
party or is threatened to be made a party to any threatened,
pending or completed action, suit or proceeding, whether civil,
criminal, administrative or investigative (other than an action
by or in the right of the corporation) by reason of the fact
that the person is or was a director, officer, employee or agent
of the corporation, or is or was serving at the request of the
corporation as a director, officer, employee or agent of another
corporation, partnership, joint venture, trust or other
enterprise, against expenses (including attorneys fees),
judgments, fines and amounts paid in settlement actually and
reasonably incurred by the person in connection with such
action, suit or proceeding if the person acted in good faith and
in a manner the person reasonably believed to be in or not
opposed to the best interests of the corporation, and with
respect to any criminal action or proceeding had no reasonable
cause to believe the persons conduct was unlawful. The
termination of any action, suit or proceeding by judgment,
order, settlement, conviction, or upon plea of nolo contendere
or its equivalent, does not, of itself, create a presumption
that the person did not act in good faith and in a manner which
he reasonably believed to be in or not opposed to the best
interests of the corporation, and, with respect to any criminal
action or proceeding, had reasonable cause to believe that his
or her conduct was lawful.
In the case of an action by or in the right of the corporation,
Section 145 of the Delaware Corporation Law empowers a
corporation to indemnify any person who was or is a party or is
threatened to be made a party to any threatened, pending or
complete action in any of the capacities set forth above against
expenses (including attorneys fees) actually and
reasonably incurred by the person in connection with the defense
or settlement of such action or suit if he or she acted in good
faith and in a manner the person reasonably believed to be in
and not opposed to the best interests of the corporation, except
that indemnification is not permitted in respect of any claim,
issue or matter as to which such person is adjudged to be liable
to the corporation unless and only to the extent that the Court
of Chancery or the court in which such action or suit was
brought determines upon application that, despite the
adjudication of liability, but in view of all of the
circumstances of the case, such person is fairly and reasonably
entitled to indemnity for such expenses which the Court of
Chancery or such court deems proper.
Section 145 of the Delaware Corporation Law further
provides that a Delaware corporation is required to indemnify a
director, officer, employee or agent against expenses (including
attorneys fees) actually and reasonably incurred by such
person in connection with any action, suit or proceeding or in
defense of any claim, issue or matter therein as to which such
person has been successful on the merits or otherwise; that
indemnification provided for by Section 145 not be deemed
exclusive of any other rights to which the indemnified party may
be entitled; that indemnification provided for by
Section 145 shall, unless otherwise provided when
II-1
authorized or ratified, continue as to a person who has ceased
to be a director, officer, employee or agent and shall inure to
the benefit of such persons heirs, executors and
administrators; and empowers the corporation to purchase and
maintain insurance on behalf of a director or officer against
any such liability asserted against such person in any such
capacity or arising out of the persons status as such
whether or not the corporation would have the power to indemnify
such person against liability under Section 145. A Delaware
corporation may provide indemnification only as authorized in
the specific case upon a determination that indemnification of
the director, officer, employee or agent is proper in the
circumstances because the person has met the applicable standard
of conduct. Such determination is to be made (i) by a
majority vote of the directors who are not parties to such
action, suit or proceeding, even through less than a quorum
(ii) by a committee of such directors designated by a
majority vote of such directors, even though less than a quorum
(iii) if there are no such directors, or if such directors
so direct, by independent legal counsel in a written opinion or
(iv) by the stockholders. As permitted by
Section 145(g) of the Delaware Corporation Law, we have
secured and maintain, on behalf of our directors and officers, a
directors and officers insurance policy for
liability arising out of his or her actions in connection with
their services to us.
Section 102(b)(7) of the Delaware Corporation Law provides
that the certificate of incorporation of a Delaware corporation
may contain a provision eliminating or limiting the personal
liability of a director to the corporation or its stockholders
for monetary damages for breach of fiduciary duty as a director,
provided that such provision shall not eliminate or limit the
liability of a director for (i) any breach of the
directors duty of loyalty to the corporation or its
stockholders, (ii) acts or omissions not in good faith or
which involve intentional misconduct or a knowing violation of
law, (iii) the payment of unlawful dividends or the making
of unlawful stock purchases or redemptions or (iv) any
transaction from which the director derived an improper personal
benefit.
The companys restated certificate of incorporation, as
amended, provides that its directors will not be personally
liable to the company or its stockholders for monetary damages
resulting from breaches of the directors fiduciary duties.
Article NINTH of the companys restated certificate of
incorporation, as amended, provides that:
To the fullest extent permitted by the Delaware General
Corporation Law, a director of the Corporation shall not be
liable to the Corporation or its stockholders for monetary
damages for breach of fiduciary duty as a director. Any repeal
or modification of the foregoing provisions of this
Article NINTH by the stockholders of the Corporation shall
not adversely affect any right or protection of a director of
the Corporation existing at the time of such repeal or
modification.
|
|
ITEM 15.
|
RECENT
SALES OF UNREGISTERED SECURITIES
|
The following paragraphs set forth certain information with
respect to all securities sold by us within the past three years
without registration under the Securities Act of 1933, as
amended (share numbers and per share exercise prices are stated
giving effect to our
1-for-100
reverse stock split of our common stock which become effective
on July 18, 2011):
1. In January 2008, the Company issued Senior Secured
Convertible Notes in the original principal amount of
$2.5 million and common stock purchase warrants to Vicis
Capital Master Fund, or Vicis, receiving net proceeds of
approximately $2.5 million after the payment of offering
related fees. In connection therewith, the Company issued to
such investor warrants to purchase up to 1,071,429 shares
of common stock at an exercise price of $3.50 per share.
2. In January 2008, in connection with the sale of the
senior secured convertible notes described in paragraph 1
above, the Company issued to a placement agent, as compensation,
warrants to purchase up to 149,999 shares of the
Companys common stock at an exercise price of $3.50 per
share.
3. In April 2008, the Company sold warrants to purchase up
to 1,350,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of
$0.10 to Vicis, receiving net proceeds of approximately
$2.95 million.
4. In April 2008, in connection with the sale of the senior
secured convertible notes described in paragraph 1 above,
the Company issued to a placement agent, as compensation,
warrants to purchase up to 10,000 shares of the
Companys common stock at an exercise price of $3.50 per
share.
II-2
5. In November 2008, the Company agreed to reduce the
conversion price of the senior secured convertible notes
referred to in paragraph 1 to $1.50, in consideration of
which it received $8.0 million.
6. In November 2008, the Company issued
2,421,429 shares of common stock to Vicis upon the exercise
of the warrants referred to in paragraphs 1 and 3 above,
receiving $242,193 in gross proceeds.
7. In November 2008, the Company issued
2,222,222 shares of common stock to Vicis upon cashless
exercise of warrants held by Vicis.
8. In April 2009, the Company issued 15,646 shares of
common stock to Brasshorn Limited and 8,388 shares of
common stock to Double U Master Fund, in each case, upon the
cashless exercise of warrants held by Brasshorn Limited and
Double U Master Fund.
9. In July 2009, the Company issued 8,333 shares of
common stock to Marvin Mermelstein and 850 shares of common
stock to Ellis International, in each case upon the exercise of
warrants held by Mr. Mermelstein and Ellis International,
receiving $137,750 in gross proceeds.
10. In August 2009, the Company issued
1,666,667 shares of common stock to Vicis upon its
conversion of $2.5 million in principal amount of
outstanding notes.
11. In August 2009, the Company issued 50,000 shares
of common stock to Double U Master Fund, 3,333 shares of
common stock to Bursteine and Lindsay Securities Corporation and
317 shares of common stock to Ellis International, in each
case upon the exercise of warrants held by Double U Master Fund,
Bursteine and Lindsay Securities Corporation and Ellis
International, receiving $804,750 in gross proceeds.
12. In October 2009, the Company issued 18,260 shares
of common stock to Kuhns Brothers Inc., 6,730 shares of
common stock to John Kuhns and 4,565 shares of common stock
to Mary Fellows, in each case upon the exercise of warrants held
by Kuhns Brothers Inc., Mr. Kuhns and Ms. Fellows,
receiving $103,443 in gross proceeds.
13. In January 2010, the Company issued
6,666,667 shares of common stock to Vicis upon its
conversion of $10.0 million in principal amount of
outstanding notes.
14. In January 2010, the Company issued to Vicis
50,000 shares of common stock and warrants, exercisable
through the second anniversary of issuance, to purchase an
additional 50,000 shares of common stock at an exercise
price of $25.00 per share, upon draw-down in the amount of the
$500,000 from the escrowed amounts in the holdback account set
up by the Company and Vicis.
15. In February 2010, the Company issued 14,290 shares
of common stock to Kuhns Brothers Inc. upon the exercise of
warrants held by Kuhns Brothers Inc., receiving $50,015 in gross
proceeds.
16. In March 2010, the Company issued to Vicis
100,000 shares of common stock and warrants, exercisable
through the second anniversary of issuance, to purchase an
additional 100,000 shares of common stock at an exercise
price of $25.00 per share, upon draw-down in the amount of the
$1.0 million from the escrowed amounts in the holdback
account set up by the Company and Vicis.
17. In March 2010, the Company issued 7,150 shares of
common stock to John Kuhns upon the exercise of warrants held by
Mr. Kuhns, receiving $25,025 in gross proceeds.
18. In April 2010, the Company issued to Vicis
50,000 shares of common stock and warrants, exercisable
through the second anniversary of issuance, to purchase an
additional 50,000 shares of common stock at an exercise
price of $25.00 per share, upon draw-down in the amount of the
$500,000 from the escrowed amounts in the holdback account set
up by the Company and Vicis.
II-3
19. In April 2010, the Company issued 7,150 shares of
common stock to John Kuhns upon the exercise of warrants held by
Mr. Kuhns, receiving $25,025 in gross proceeds.
20. In June 2010, the Company issued to Vicis
50,000 shares of common stock and warrants, exercisable
through the second anniversary of issuance, to purchase an
additional 50,000 shares of common stock at an exercise
price of $25.00 per share, upon draw-down in the amount of the
$500,000 from the escrowed amounts in the holdback account set
up by the Company and Vicis.
21. In September 2010, the Company issued to Vicis
50,000 shares of common stock and warrants, exercisable
through the second anniversary of issuance, to purchase an
additional 50,000 shares of common stock at an exercise
price of $25.00 per share, upon draw-down in the amount of the
$500,000 from the escrowed amounts in the holdback account set
up by the Company and Vicis.
22. In December 2010, the Company issued to Vicis
500,000 shares of common stock and warrants, exercisable
through the second anniversary of issuance, to purchase an
additional 500,000 shares of common stock at an exercise
price of $20.00 per share, upon draw-down in the amount of the
$5.0 million from the escrowed amounts in the holdback
account set up by the Company and Vicis.
23. In February 2011, the Company issued 4,500 shares
of common stock to Gregory Dryer upon the exercise of warrants
held by Mr. Dryer, receiving $15,750 in gross proceeds.
24. In April 2011, the Company issued 5,714 shares of
common stock to Gregory Dryer upon the exercise of warrants held
by Mr. Dryer, receiving $20,000 in gross proceeds.
25. In May 2011, the Company issued 10,000 shares of
common stock to Gregory Dryer upon the exercise of warrants held
by Mr. Dryer, receiving $35,000 in gross proceeds.
26. In June 2011, the Company issued 10,000 shares of
common stock to Gregory Dryer upon the exercise of warrants held
by Mr. Dryer, receiving $35,000 in gross proceeds.
27. In July 2011, the Company issued 10,000 shares of
common stock to Gregory Dryer upon the exercise of warrants held
by Mr. Dryer, receiving $35,000 in gross proceeds.
All of the securities issued in the transactions described above
were issued without registration under the Securities Act in
reliance upon the exemption provided in Section 4(2) of the
Securities Act or Regulation D under Securities Act. The
recipients of securities in each such transaction acquired the
securities for investment only and not with a view to or for
sale in connection with any distribution thereof. Appropriate
legends were affixed to the share certificates issued in all of
the above transactions. The Company believes the recipients were
all accredited investors within the meaning of
Rule 501(a) of Regulation D under the Securities Act,
or had such knowledge and experience in financial and business
matters as to be able to evaluate the merits and risks of an
investment in its common stock. All recipients had adequate
access to information about the Company. None of the
transactions described above involved any underwriters,
underwriting discounts or commissions, any general solicitation,
advertising or public offering.
II-4
|
|
ITEM 16.
|
EXHIBITS AND
FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
|
(a) Exhibits. The following exhibits are
included herein or are incorporated herein by reference:
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
Number
|
|
Description
|
|
|
1
|
.1*
|
|
Form of Underwriting Agreement
|
|
3
|
.1
|
|
Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Ambient Corporation, as
amended
|
|
3
|
.2
|
|
Bylaws of Ambient Corporation
|
|
4
|
.1
|
|
Specimen Stock Certificate
|
|
4
|
.2
|
|
Common Stock Purchase Warrant (Series A) (filed as
Exhibit 4.2 to the Current Report of Ambient Corporation on
Form 8-K,
filed July 31, 2007).(1)
|
|
4
|
.3
|
|
Common Stock Purchase Warrant (Series B) (filed as
Exhibit 4.3 to the Current Report of Ambient Corporation on
Form 8-K,
filed July 31, 2007).(1)
|
|
4
|
.4
|
|
Common Stock Purchase Warrant (Series C) (filed as
Exhibit 4.2 to the Current Report of Ambient Corporation on
Form 8-K,
filed July 31, 2007).(1)
|
|
4
|
.5
|
|
Common Stock Purchase Warrant (Series D) (filed as
Exhibit 4.3 to the Current Report of Ambient Corporation on
Form 8-K,
filed November 5, 2007).(1)
|
|
4
|
.6
|
|
Common Stock Purchase Warrant (Series E) (filed as
Exhibit 4.2 to the Current Report of Ambient Corporation on
Form 8-K,
filed January 17, 2008).(1)
|
|
4
|
.7
|
|
Warrant issued as of April 23, 2008 (filed as
Exhibit 4.1 to the Quarterly Report of Ambient Corporation
on
Form 10-Q
for the three month period ended June 30, 2008, filed
August 14, 2008).(1)
|
|
4
|
.8
|
|
Common Stock Purchase Warrant (Series G) (filed as
Exhibit 4.1 to the Quarterly Report of Ambient Corporation
on
Form 10-Q
for the three month period ended September 30, 2009, filed
November 16, 2009).(1)
|
|
5
|
.1*
|
|
Opinion of Shipman & Goodwin LLP
|
|
10
|
.1
|
|
Ambient Corporation 2000 Equity Incentive Plan (filed as
Appendix A to the Definitive Information Statement of
Ambient Corporation on Schedule 14C, filed
December 24, 2009).(1)+
|
|
10
|
.2
|
|
Ambient Corporation 2002 Non-Employee Directors Stock Option
Plan (filed as Appendix B to the Definitive Information
Statement of Ambient Corporation on Schedule 14C, filed
December 24, 2009).(1)
|
|
10
|
.3
|
|
Amended and Restated Employment Agreement effective as of
December 30, 2008 between Ambient Corporation and John
Joyce (filed as Exhibit 10.4 to the Quarterly Report of
Ambient Corporation on
Form 10-Q
for the three month period ended March 31, 2008, filed
May 15, 2008).(1)+
|
|
10
|
.4
|
|
Amended and Restated Employment Agreement effective as of
June 2, 2008 between Ambient Corporation and Ramdas Rao
(filed as Exhibit 10.5 to the Quarterly Report of Ambient
Corporation on
Form 10-Q
for the three month period ended March 31, 2008, filed
May 15, 2008).(1)+
|
|
10
|
.5
|
|
Employment Agreement effective as of August 4, 2011 between
Ambient Corporation and Mark L. Fidler (filed as
Exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report of Ambient Corporation
on
Form 8-K,
filed on August 8, 2011).(1)+
|
|
10
|
.6
|
|
Securities Purchase Agreement dated as of May 26, 2006
among Ambient Corporation and certain investors (filed as
Exhibit 10.8 to the Registration Statement of Ambient
Corporation on
Form SB-2,
filed June 8, 2006, as File
No. 333-134872).(1)
|
|
10
|
.7
|
|
Registration Rights Agreement dated as of May 26, 2006
among Ambient Corporation and certain investors (filed as
Exhibit 10.9 to the Registration Statement of Ambient
Corporation on
Form SB-2,
filed June 8, 2006, as File
No. 333-134872).(1)
|
|
10
|
.8
|
|
Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of July 31, 2007,
between Ambient Corporation and Vicis Capital Master Fund (filed
as Exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report of Ambient
Corporation on
Form 8-K,
filed on July 31, 2007).(1)
|
|
10
|
.9
|
|
Securities Purchase Agreement, dated as of July 31, 2007
between Ambient Corporation and Vicis Capital Master Fund (filed
as Exhibit 10.2 to the Current Report of Ambient
Corporation on
Form 8-K,
filed on July 31, 2007).(1)
|
|
10
|
.10
|
|
Security Agreement, dated as of July 31, 2007 between
Ambient Corporation and Vicis Capital Master Fund (filed as
Exhibit 10.3 to the Current Report of Ambient Corporation
on
Form 8-K,
filed on July 31, 2007).(1)
|
II-5
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
Number
|
|
Description
|
|
|
10
|
.11
|
|
Securities Purchase Agreement dated as of November 1, 2007,
between Ambient Corporation and Vicis Capital Master Fund (filed
as Exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report of Ambient
Corporation on
Form 8-K,
filed on November 5, 2007).(1)
|
|
10
|
.12
|
|
First Amendment dated as of November 1, 2007 to
Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of July 31, 2007,
between Ambient and Vicis Capital Master Fund (filed as
Exhibit 10.2 to the Current Report of Ambient Corporation
on
Form 8-K,
filed on November 5, 2007).(1)
|
|
10
|
.13
|
|
First Amendment dated as of November 1, 2007 to Securities
Purchase Agreement, dated as of July 31, 2007 between
Ambient Corporation and Vicis Capital Master Fund (filed as
Exhibit 10.3 to the Current Report of Ambient Corporation
on
Form 8-K,
filed on November 5, 2007).(1)
|
|
10
|
.14
|
|
Securities Purchase Agreement dated as of January 15, 2008,
between Ambient Corporation and Vicis Capital Master Fund (filed
as Exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report of Ambient
Corporation on
Form 8-K,
filed on January 17, 2008).(1)
|
|
10
|
.15
|
|
Second Amendment dated as of January 15, 2008 to
Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of July 31, 2007,
between Ambient Corporation and Vicis Capital Master Fund (filed
as Exhibit 10.2 to the Current Report of Ambient
Corporation on
Form 8-K,
filed on January 17, 2008).(1)
|
|
10
|
.16
|
|
First Amendment dated as of January 15, 2008 to Securities
Purchase Agreement, dated as of November 1, 2007 between
Ambient Corporation and Vicis Capital Master Fund (filed as
Exhibit 10.3 to the Current Report of Ambient Corporation
on
Form 8-K,
filed on January 17, 2008).(1)
|
|
10
|
.17
|
|
Second Amendment dated as of January 15, 2008 to Securities
Purchase Agreement, dated as of July 31, 2007 between
Ambient Corporation and Vicis Capital Master Fund (filed as
Exhibit 10.4 to the Current Report of Ambient Corporation
on
Form 8-K,
filed on January 17, 2008).(1)
|
|
10
|
.18
|
|
Securities Purchase Agreement dated as of April 23, 2008
between Ambient Corporation and Vicis Capital Master Fund (filed
as Exhibit 10.1 to the Quarterly Report of Ambient
Corporation on
Form 10-Q
for the three month period ended June 30, 2008, filed
August 14, 2008).(1)
|
|
10
|
.19
|
|
Amendment and Waiver dated as of April 23, 2008 between
Ambient Corporation and Vicis Capital Master Fund (filed as
Exhibit 10.2 to the Quarterly Report of Ambient Corporation
on
Form 10-Q
for the three month period ended June 30, 2008, filed
August 14, 2008).(1)
|
|
10
|
.20
|
|
Debenture Amendment Agreement dated as of November 21, 2008
between Ambient Corporation and Vicis Capital Master Fund (filed
as Exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report of Ambient
Corporation on
Form 8-K,
filed November 24, 2008).(1)
|
|
10
|
.21
|
|
Securities Purchase Agreement, dated as of November 16,
2009 between Ambient Corporation and Vicis Capital Master Fund
(filed as Exhibit 10.2 to the Quarterly Report of Ambient
Corporation on
Form 10-Q
for the three month period ended September 30, 2009, filed
November 16, 2009).(1)
|
|
10
|
.22
|
|
Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of November 16,
2009 between Ambient Corporation and Vicis Capital Master Fund
(filed as Exhibit 10.3 to the Quarterly Report of Ambient
Corporation on
Form 10-Q
for the three month period ended September 30, 2009, filed
November 16, 2009).(1)
|
|
10
|
.23
|
|
Amendment to Securities Purchase Agreement dated as of
January 15, 2010, between Ambient and Vicis Capital Master
Fund (filed as Exhibit 10.26 to the Annual Report of
Ambient Corporation on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2009, filed March 31,
2010).(1)
|
|
10
|
.24
|
|
Commercial Deployment Agreement dated as of March 31, 2008
between Ambient Corporation and Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC
(filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Quarterly Report of Ambient
Corporation on
Form 10-Q
for the three month period ended March 31, 2008, filed
May 15, 2008). (Pursuant to Rule 24b-2 under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has requested
confidential treatment of the portion of this exhibit deleted
from the filed copy).(1)
|
|
10
|
.25
|
|
Master Supply and Alliance Agreement dated as of
February 17, 2009 between Ambient Corporation and Bel Fuse
Inc. (Pursuant to Rule 406 under the Securities Act of
1933, the registrant has requested confidential treatment of the
portion of this exhibit deleted from the filed copy).
|
|
10
|
.26
|
|
Product Sales, Services & Software Agreement between
Ambient Corporation and Duke Energy business Services LLC on its
own behalf and as agent for and on behalf of Duke Energy
Carolinas, LLC, Duke Energy Indiana, Inc, Duke Energy Ohio,
Inc., Duke Energy Kentucky, Inc., and certain after acquired
affiliates (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Quarterly Report
of Ambient Corporation on
Form 10-Q
for the three month period ended September 30, 2009, filed
November 16, 2009). (Pursuant to
Rule 24b-2
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has
requested confidential treatment of portions of this exhibit
deleted from the filed copy.)(1)
|
II-6
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
Number
|
|
Description
|
|
|
10
|
.27
|
|
Office Lease Agreement dated as of May 21, 2009, between
Ambient Corporation and NS 7/57 Acquisition LLC (filed as
Exhibit 10.1 to the Quarterly Report of Ambient Corporation
on
Form 10-Q
for the three month period ended June 30, 2009, filed
August 7, 2009).(1)
|
|
21
|
|
|
Subsidiaries
|
|
23
|
.1
|
|
Consent of Rotenberg Meril Solomon Bertiger &
Guttilla, P.C.
|
|
23
|
.2*
|
|
Consent of Shipman & Goodwin LLP, included in opinion
filed as Exhibit 5.1
|
|
24
|
.1
|
|
Power of Attorney (See Signatures to this
Form S-1)
|
|
101
|
.INS*
|
|
XBRL Instance Document
|
|
101
|
.SCH*
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema
|
|
101
|
.CAL*
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase
|
|
101
|
.DEF*
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase
|
|
101
|
.LAB*
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase
|
|
101
|
.PRE*
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase
|
|
|
|
* |
|
To be filed by amendment |
|
+ |
|
Management Agreement |
|
|
|
Pursuant to Rule 406T of
Regulation S-T,
these interactive data files are deemed not filed or part of a
registration statement or prospectus for purposes of
Sections 11 or 12 of the Securities Act of 1933 or
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and
otherwise are not subject to liability. |
|
(1) |
|
Incorporated by reference |
(b) Financial Statement Schedules. All
financial statement schedules have been omitted because they are
not required by
Regulation S-X
or are not applicable or the required information is included in
the registrants financial statements or notes thereto.
Insofar as indemnification for liabilities arising under the
Securities Act of 1933 may be permitted to directors,
officers and controlling persons of the registrant pursuant to
the foregoing provisions, or otherwise, the registrant has been
advised that in the opinion of the Securities and Exchange
Commission such indemnification is against public policy as
expressed in the Act and is, therefore, unenforceable. In the
event that a claim for indemnification against such liabilities
(other than the payment by the registrant of expenses incurred
or paid by a director, officer or controlling person of the
registrant in the successful defense of any action, suit or
proceeding) is asserted by such director, officer or controlling
person in connection with the securities being registered, the
registrant will, unless in the opinion of its counsel the matter
has been settled by controlling precedent, submit to a court of
appropriate jurisdiction the question whether such
indemnification by it is against public policy as expressed in
the Act and will be governed by the final adjudication of such
issue.
The undersigned registrant hereby undertakes that:
(1) For purposes of determining any liability under the
Securities Act of 1933, the information omitted from the form of
prospectus filed as part of this registration statement in
reliance upon Rule 430A and contained in a form of
prospectus filed by the registrant pursuant to
Rule 424(b)(1) or (4) or 497(h) under the Securities
Act shall be deemed to be part of this registration statement as
of the time it was declared effective.
(2) For the purposes determining any liability under the
Securities Act of 1933, each post-effective amendment that
contains a form of prospectus shall be deemed to be a new
registration statement relating to the securities offered
therein, and the offering of such securities at that time shall
be deemed to be the initial bona fide offering thereof.
II-7
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, the
registrant has duly caused this registration statement to be
signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly
authorized, in the City of Newton, State of Massachusetts, on
August 19, 2011.
AMBIENT CORPORATION
JOHN J. JOYCE
PRESIDENT and
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
POWER OF
ATTORNEY
Each person whose signature appears below hereby constitutes and
appoints John J. Joyce and Mark L. Fidler, and each of them, as
his or her attorney-in-fact and agent, with full power of
substitution and resubstitution for him/her in any and all
capacities, to sign any or all amendments or post-effective
amendments to this registration statement, or any registration
statement for the same offering that is to be effective upon
filing pursuant to Rule 462(b) under the Securities Act of
1933, and to file the same, with exhibits thereto and other
documents in connection therewith or in connection with the
registration of the shares of common stock under the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, with the Securities and
Exchange Commission, granting unto such attorney-in-fact and
agent full power and authority to do and perform each and every
act and thing requisite and necessary in connection with such
matters and hereby ratifying and confirming all that such
attorney-in-fact and agent or his substitutes may do or cause to
be done by virtue hereof.
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, this
registration statement has been signed by the following persons
in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SIGNATURE
|
|
TITLE
|
|
DATE
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ John
J. Joyce
John
J. Joyce
|
|
PRESIDENT, CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD and
DIRECTOR
(Principal Executive Officer)
|
|
August 19, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Mark
L. Fidler
Mark
L. Fidler
|
|
VICE PRESIDENT, CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER and TREASURER
(Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)
|
|
August 19, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Michael
L. Widland
Michael
L. Widland
|
|
DIRECTOR
|
|
August 19, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ D.
Howard Pierce
D.
Howard Pierce
|
|
DIRECTOR
|
|
August 19, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Thomas
Michael Higgins
Thomas
Michael Higgins
|
|
DIRECTOR
|
|
August 19, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Shad
L. Stastney
Shad
L. Stastney
|
|
DIRECTOR
|
|
August 19, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Francesca
E. Scarito
Francesca
E. Scarito
|
|
DIRECTOR
|
|
August 19, 2011
|
S-1
EXHIBIT INDEX
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
Number
|
|
Description
|
|
|
1
|
.1*
|
|
Form of Underwriting Agreement
|
|
3
|
.1
|
|
Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Ambient Corporation, as
amended
|
|
3
|
.2
|
|
Bylaws of Ambient Corporation
|
|
4
|
.1
|
|
Specimen Stock Certificate
|
|
4
|
.2
|
|
Common Stock Purchase Warrant (Series A) (filed as
Exhibit 4.2 to the Current Report of Ambient Corporation on
Form 8-K,
filed July 31, 2007).(1)
|
|
4
|
.3
|
|
Common Stock Purchase Warrant (Series B) (filed as
Exhibit 4.3 to the Current Report of Ambient Corporation on
Form 8-K,
filed July 31, 2007).(1)
|
|
4
|
.4
|
|
Common Stock Purchase Warrant (Series C) (filed as
Exhibit 4.2 to the Current Report of Ambient Corporation on
Form 8-K,
filed July 31, 2007).(1)
|
|
4
|
.5
|
|
Common Stock Purchase Warrant (Series D) (filed as
Exhibit 4.3 to the Current Report of Ambient Corporation on
Form 8-K,
filed November 5, 2007).(1)
|
|
4
|
.6
|
|
Common Stock Purchase Warrant (Series E) (filed as
Exhibit 4.2 to the Current Report of Ambient Corporation on
Form 8-K,
filed January 17, 2008).(1)
|
|
4
|
.7
|
|
Warrant issued as of April 23, 2008 (filed as
Exhibit 4.1 to the Quarterly Report of Ambient Corporation
on
Form 10-Q
for the three month period ended June 30, 2008, filed
August 14, 2008).(1)
|
|
4
|
.8
|
|
Common Stock Purchase Warrant (Series G) (filed as
Exhibit 4.1 to the Quarterly Report of Ambient Corporation
on
Form 10-Q
for the three month period ended September 30, 2009, filed
November 16, 2009).(1)
|
|
5
|
.1*
|
|
Opinion of Shipman & Goodwin LLP
|
|
10
|
.1
|
|
Ambient Corporation 2000 Equity Incentive Plan (filed as
Appendix A to the Definitive Information Statement of
Ambient Corporation on Schedule 14C, filed
December 24, 2009).(1)+
|
|
10
|
.2
|
|
Ambient Corporation 2002 Non-Employee Directors Stock Option
Plan (filed as Appendix B to the Definitive Information
Statement of Ambient Corporation on Schedule 14C, filed
December 24, 2009).(1)
|
|
10
|
.3
|
|
Amended and Restated Employment Agreement effective as of
December 30, 2008 between Ambient Corporation and John
Joyce (filed as Exhibit 10.4 to the Quarterly Report of
Ambient Corporation on
Form 10-Q
for the three month period ended March 31, 2008, filed
May 15, 2008).(1)+
|
|
10
|
.4
|
|
Amended and Restated Employment Agreement effective as of
June 2, 2008 between Ambient Corporation and Ramdas Rao
(filed as Exhibit 10.5 to the Quarterly Report of Ambient
Corporation on
Form 10-Q
for the three month period ended March 31, 2008, filed
May 15, 2008).(1)+
|
|
10
|
.5
|
|
Employment Agreement effective as of August 4, 2011 between
Ambient Corporation and Mark L. Fidler (filed as
Exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report of Ambient Corporation
on
Form 8-K,
filed on August 8, 2011).(1)+
|
|
10
|
.6
|
|
Securities Purchase Agreement dated as of May 26, 2006
among Ambient Corporation and certain investors (filed as
Exhibit 10.8 to the Registration Statement of Ambient
Corporation on
Form SB-2,
filed June 8, 2006, as File
No. 333-134872).(1)
|
|
10
|
.7
|
|
Registration Rights Agreement dated as of May 26, 2006
among Ambient Corporation and certain investors (filed as
Exhibit 10.9 to the Registration Statement of Ambient
Corporation on
Form SB-2,
filed June 8, 2006, as File
No. 333-134872).(1)
|
|
10
|
.8
|
|
Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of July 31, 2007,
between Ambient Corporation and Vicis Capital Master Fund (filed
as Exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report of Ambient
Corporation on
Form 8-K,
filed on July 31, 2007).(1)
|
|
10
|
.9
|
|
Securities Purchase Agreement, dated as of July 31, 2007
between Ambient Corporation and Vicis Capital Master Fund (filed
as Exhibit 10.2 to the Current Report of Ambient
Corporation on
Form 8-K,
filed on July 31, 2007).(1)
|
|
10
|
.10
|
|
Security Agreement, dated as of July 31, 2007 between
Ambient Corporation and Vicis Capital Master Fund (filed as
Exhibit 10.3 to the Current Report of Ambient Corporation
on
Form 8-K,
filed on July 31, 2007).(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
Number
|
|
Description
|
|
|
10
|
.11
|
|
Securities Purchase Agreement dated as of November 1, 2007,
between Ambient Corporation and Vicis Capital Master Fund (filed
as Exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report of Ambient
Corporation on
Form 8-K,
filed on November 5, 2007).(1)
|
|
10
|
.12
|
|
First Amendment dated as of November 1, 2007 to
Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of July 31, 2007,
between Ambient and Vicis Capital Master Fund (filed as
Exhibit 10.2 to the Current Report of Ambient Corporation
on
Form 8-K,
filed on November 5, 2007).(1)
|
|
10
|
.13
|
|
First Amendment dated as of November 1, 2007 to Securities
Purchase Agreement, dated as of July 31, 2007 between
Ambient Corporation and Vicis Capital Master Fund (filed as
Exhibit 10.3 to the Current Report of Ambient Corporation
on
Form 8-K,
filed on November 5, 2007).(1)
|
|
10
|
.14
|
|
Securities Purchase Agreement dated as of January 15, 2008,
between Ambient Corporation and Vicis Capital Master Fund (filed
as Exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report of Ambient
Corporation on
Form 8-K,
filed on January 17, 2008).(1)
|
|
10
|
.15
|
|
Second Amendment dated as of January 15, 2008 to
Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of July 31, 2007,
between Ambient Corporation and Vicis Capital Master Fund (filed
as Exhibit 10.2 to the Current Report of Ambient
Corporation on
Form 8-K,
filed on January 17, 2008).(1)
|
|
10
|
.16
|
|
First Amendment dated as of January 15, 2008 to Securities
Purchase Agreement, dated as of November 1, 2007, between
Ambient Corporation and Vicis Capital Master Fund (filed as
Exhibit 10.3 to the Current Report of Ambient Corporation
on
Form 8-K,
filed on January 17, 2008).(1)
|
|
10
|
.17
|
|
Second Amendment dated as of January 15, 2008 to Securities
Purchase Agreement, dated as of July 31, 2007, between
Ambient Corporation and Vicis Capital Master Fund (filed as
Exhibit 10.4 to the Current Report of Ambient Corporation
on
Form 8-K,
filed on January 17, 2008).(1)
|
|
10
|
.18
|
|
Securities Purchase Agreement dated as of April 23, 2008
between Ambient Corporation and Vicis Capital Master Fund (filed
as Exhibit 10.1 to the Quarterly Report of Ambient
Corporation on
Form 10-Q
for the three month period ended June 30, 2008, filed
August 14, 2008).(1)
|
|
10
|
.19
|
|
Amendment and Waiver dated as of April 23, 2008 between
Ambient Corporation and Vicis Capital Master Fund (filed as
Exhibit 10.2 to the Quarterly Report of Ambient Corporation
on
Form 10-Q
for the three month period ended June 30, 2008, filed
August 14, 2008).(1)
|
|
10
|
.20
|
|
Debenture Amendment Agreement dated as of November 21, 2008
between Ambient Corporation and Vicis Capital Master Fund (filed
as Exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report of Ambient
Corporation on
Form 8-K,
filed November 24, 2008).(1)
|
|
10
|
.21
|
|
Securities Purchase Agreement, dated as of November 16,
2009 between Ambient Corporation and Vicis Capital Master Fund
(filed as Exhibit 10.2 to the Quarterly Report of Ambient
Corporation on
Form 10-Q
for the three month period ended September 30, 2009, filed
November 16, 2009).(1)
|
|
10
|
.22
|
|
Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of November 16,
2009 between Ambient Corporation and Vicis Capital Master Fund
(filed as Exhibit 10.3 to the Quarterly Report of Ambient
Corporation on
Form 10-Q
for the three month period ended September 30, 2009, filed
November 16, 2009).(1)
|
|
10
|
.23
|
|
Amendment to Securities Purchase Agreement dated as of
January 15, 2010, between Ambient and Vicis Capital Master
Fund (filed as Exhibit 10.26 to the Annual Report of
Ambient Corporation on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2009, filed March 31,
2010).(1)
|
|
10
|
.24
|
|
Commercial Deployment Agreement dated as of March 31, 2008
between Ambient Corporation and Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC
(filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Quarterly Report of Ambient
Corporation on
Form 10-Q
for the three month period ended March 31, 2008, filed
May 15, 2008). (Pursuant to Rule 24b-2 under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has requested
confidential treatment of the portion of this exhibit deleted
from the filed copy).(1)
|
|
10
|
.25
|
|
Master Supply and Alliance Agreement dated as of
February 17, 2009 between Ambient Corporation and Bel Fuse
Inc. (Pursuant to Rule 406 under the Securities Act of
1933, the registrant has requested confidential treatment of the
portion of this exhibit deleted from the filed copy).
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
Number
|
|
Description
|
|
|
10
|
.26
|
|
Product Sales, Services & Software Agreement between
Ambient Corporation and Duke Energy business Services LLC on its
own behalf and as agent for and on behalf of Duke Energy
Carolinas, LLC, Duke Energy Indiana, Inc, Duke Energy Ohio,
Inc., Duke Energy Kentucky, Inc., and certain after acquired
affiliates (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Quarterly Report
of Ambient Corporation on
Form 10-Q
for the three month period ended September 30, 2009, filed
November 16, 2009). (Pursuant to
Rule 24b-2
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has
requested confidential treatment of portions of this exhibit
deleted from the filed copy.)(1)
|
|
10
|
.27
|
|
Office Lease Agreement dated as of May 21, 2009, between
Ambient Corporation and NS 7/57 Acquisition LLC (filed as
Exhibit 10.1 to the Quarterly Report of Ambient Corporation
on
Form 10-Q
for the three month period ended June 30, 2009, filed
August 7, 2009).(1)
|
|
21
|
|
|
Subsidiaries
|
|
23
|
.1
|
|
Consent of Rotenberg Meril Solomon Bertiger &
Guttilla, P.C.
|
|
23
|
.2*
|
|
Consent of Shipman & Goodwin LLP, included in opinion
filed as Exhibit 5.1
|
|
24
|
.1
|
|
Power of Attorney (see Signatures to this
Form S-1)
|
|
101
|
.INS*
|
|
XBRL Instance Document
|
|
101
|
.SCH*
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema
|
|
101
|
.CAL*
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase
|
|
101
|
.DEF*
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase
|
|
101
|
.LAB*
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase
|
|
101
|
.PRE*
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase
|
|
|
|
* |
|
To be filed by amendment |
|
+ |
|
Management Agreement |
|
|
|
Pursuant to Rule 406T of
Regulation S-T,
these interactive data files are deemed not filed or part of a
registration statement or prospectus for purposes of
Sections 11 or 12 of the Securities Act of 1933 or
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and
otherwise are not subject to liability. |
|
(1) |
|
Incorporated by reference |