Attached files

file filename
EXCEL - IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT - Sanomedics, Inc.Financial_Report.xls
EX-31.2 - EXHIBIT 31.2 - Sanomedics, Inc.ex312.htm
EX-32.1 - EXHIBIT 32.1 - Sanomedics, Inc.ex321.htm
EX-31.1 - EXHIBIT 31.1 - Sanomedics, Inc.ex311.htm
EX-10.25 - EXHIBIT 10.25 - Sanomedics, Inc.ex1025.htm
EX-10.27 - EXHIBIT 10.27 - Sanomedics, Inc.ex1027.htm
EX-10.28 - EXHIBIT 10.28 - Sanomedics, Inc.ex1028.htm
EX-10.24 - EXHIBIT 10.24 - Sanomedics, Inc.ex1024.htm
EX-10.23 - EXHIBIT 10.23 - Sanomedics, Inc.ex1023.htm
EX-10.26 - EXHIBIT 10.26 - Sanomedics, Inc.ex1026.htm
EX-10.29 - EXHIBIT 10.29 - Sanomedics, Inc.ex1029.htm
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

x
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
   
 
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2011
   
 
OR
   
o
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
   
 
For the transition period from ________________ to ________________

Commission file number: 000-54167

Sanomedics International Holdings, Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)


Delaware
 
27-3320809
(State or other jurisdiction of
 
(I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization)
 
Identification No.)
     
80 SW 8th Street, Suite 2180, Miami, Florida
 
33180
(Address of principal executive offices)
 
(Zip Code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (305) 433-7814

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes x                       No  o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
Yes o                       No   o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company.  See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer o
Accelerated filer   o
   
Non-accelerated filer   o   (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
Smaller reporting company   x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Yes o                       No   x

Class
 
Outstanding at August 15, 2011
Common Stock, $0.001 par value per share
 
13,636,939 shares

 
1

 
 
TABLE OF CONTENTS
 


     
PAGE
 
         
PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION
 
         
Item 1.    
Financial Statements
   
3
 
           
 
Balance Sheets – As of June 30, 2011 (Unaudited) and December 31, 2010
   
3
 
           
 
Statements of Operations – For the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2011 and 2010(Unaudited)
   
4
 
           
 
Statements of Cash Flows – For the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2011 and 2010(Unaudited)
   
5
 
           
 
Notes to Financial Statements (Unaudited)
   
6-10
 
           
Item 2.    
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
   
11
 
           
Item 3.
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
   
16
 
           
Item 4.     
Controls and Procedures
   
16
 
           
Item 4T.  
Controls and Procedures
   
16
 
           
           
PART II – OTHER INFORMATION
 
 Item 1. 
Legal Proceedings
       
           
Item 1A.   
Risk Factors
   
17
 
           
Item 2.    
Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
   
17
 
           
Item 3.
Defaults Upon Senior Securities
   
17
 
           
Item 4.  
(Removed and Reserved)
   
17
 
           
Item 5.  
Other Information
   
17
 
           
Item 6.
Exhibits
   
17
 
           
Signatures
     
18
 
 
 
 
2

 
 
PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION
 
Item 1.
Financial Statements.
 
Sanomedics International Holdings, Inc.
Consolidated Balance Sheets
 
 
   
June 30,
   
December 31,
 
   
2011
   
2010
 
   
(Unaudited)
       
Assets
           
             
Current Assets
           
Cash in bank
  $ 21,431     $ 2,837  
Accounts receivable
    2,537       7,371  
Inventory
    175,170       193,153  
Other current assets
    -       -  
Total Current Assets
    199,138       203,361  
                 
Fixed assets, net
    23,934       24,201  
                 
Other assets
    46,647       48,824  
                 
Total Assets
  $ 269,719     $ 276,386  
                 
Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity (Deficit)
               
                 
Current Liabilities
               
Accrued salaries payable
    827,631       635,131  
Accounts payable and other liabilities
    80,593       18,090  
Accrued interest payable
    187,052       107,411  
Short term portion of notes payable - related party
    853,787       1,925,629  
Total Current Liabilities
    1,949,063       2,686,261  
                 
Notes payable - related party
    1,458,925       -  
                 
Stockholders’ Deficit
               
Preferred stock, $0.001 par value: 1,000 shares authorized,
               
issued and outstanding.
    1       1  
Common stock, $0.001 par value: 250,000,000 shares authorized,
               
13,635,939 issued and outstanding as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010.
    13,636       13,636  
Additional paid in capital
    1,426,764       1,426,764  
Stock subscription receivable
    (20,000 )     (20,000 )
Accumulated deficit
    (4,558,670 )     (3,830,276 )
Total Stockholders’ Deficit
    (3,138,269 )     (2,409,875 )
                 
Total Liabilities and Stockholders' Deficit
  $ 269,719     $ 276,386  

 
3

 
 
Sanomedics International Holdings, Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Operations
Unaudited
 
 
                         
   
For the Three Months Ended June 30,
   
For the Six Months Ended June 30,
 
   
2011
   
2010
   
2011
   
2010
 
   
(Unaudited)
   
(Unaudited)
   
(Unaudited)
   
(Unaudited)
 
                         
Revenues, net
  $ 10,225     $ 46,827     $ 32,165     $ 57,967  
                                 
Cost of goods sold
    9,582       35,900       24,482       52,689  
                                 
Gross profit
    643       10,927       7,683       5,278  
                                 
Operating expenses
                               
General and administrative
    272,016       273,597       515,401       1,110,638  
Research and development
    67,709       50,802       135,879       110,990  
Depreciation and Amortization
    1,838       291       5,125       405  
Total operating expenses
    341,563       324,690       656,405       1,222,033  
                                 
Loss from operations
    (340,920 )     (313,763 )     (648,722 )     (1,216,755 )
                                 
Other expense
                               
Interest expense
    (45,021 )     (16,902 )     (79,672 )     (28,538 )
Total other expense
    (45,021 )     (16,902 )     (79,672 )     (28,538 )
                                 
Net loss before provision (benefit) for income taxes
    (385,941 )     (330,665 )     (728,394 )     (1,245,293 )
Provision(benefit) for income taxes
    -       -       -       -  
Net loss
  $ (385,941 )   $ (330,665 )   $ (728,394 )   $ (1,245,293 )
                                 
Net loss per share - basic and diluted
  $ (0.03 )   $ (0.02 )   $ (0.05 )   $ (0.09 )
                                 
Weighted average number of shares outstanding during the period - basic and diluted
    13,635,939       13,385,939       13,635,939       13,156,540  

 
 
4

 
 
Sanomedics International Holdings, Inc
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
Unaudited
 
   
For the Six Months Ended June 30,
 
   
2011
   
2010
 
   
(Unaudited)
 
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES
           
Net loss
  $ (728,394 )   $ (1,245,293 )
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities
               
Depreciation
    1,998       405  
Amortization
    3,127       -  
Stock based compensation
    -       734,750  
Changes in operating assets and liabilities
               
Accounts receivable
    4,834       (10,430 )
Inventory
    17,983       (79,632 )
Other current assets
    -       2,653  
Accrued salaries payable
    192,500       143,334  
Accrued interest payable
    79,641       28,537  
Accounts payable and other liabilities
    62,502       12,358  
Net Cash Used In Operating Activities
    (365,809 )     (413,318 )
                 
CASH FLOWS USED FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES
               
Purchase of fixed assets
    (1,730 )     (7,045 )
Purchase of intangible assets
    (950 )     (23,373 )
Net Cash Used In Investing Activities
    (2,680 )     (30,418 )
                 
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES
               
Increase in notes payable - related party
    387,083       455,439  
Proceeds from sale of common stock
    -       13,699  
Net Cash Provided By Financing Activities
    387,083       469,138  
                 
Net increase in cash
    18,594       25,402  
                 
Cash - beginning of period
    2,837       779  
                 
Cash - end of period
  $ 21,431     $ 26,181  
                 
Supplemental Disclosure of Cash Flow Information
               
Cash paid during the period for:
               
    Income taxes
  $ -     $ -  
    Interest
  $ -     $ -  
                 
Non Cash Transactions
               
Conversion of accrued liabilities to Convertible debt
     -       464,994  

 
5

 

Sanomedics International Holdings, Inc.
Notes to Financial Statements
June 30, 2011
(Unaudited)
 
NOTE 1 – BASIS OF PRESENTATION
 
The accompanying unaudited financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and the rules and regulations of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission for interim financial information.  Accordingly, they do not include all the information and footnotes necessary for a comprehensive presentation of financial position, results of operations, or cash flows. It is management's opinion, however, that all material adjustments (consisting of normal recurring adjustments) have been made which are necessary for a fair financial statement presentation. The results for the interim period are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full year.

The unaudited interim financial statements should be read in conjunction with the Company’s annual report on Form 10K, which contains the audited financial statements and notes thereto, together with the Management’s Discussion and Analysis, for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010.  The interim results for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 are not necessarily indicative of the results for the full fiscal year.

NOTE 2 – SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
 
Principles of Consolidation

All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

Liquidity and Going Concern

The financial statements have been prepared on a going concern basis, and do not reflect any adjustments related to the uncertainty surrounding our recurring losses or accumulated deficit.

The Company currently has limited revenue and is incurring losses. These factors raise substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern. Management has financed the Company's operations principally through loans from an affiliate of the Company’s CEO, who is also one of the principal shareholders.  It is the Company's intent to continue to obtain funds in this manner unless and until it can raise funds through the sale of equity securities. However, management cannot provide any assurances that the Company will be successful in accomplishing any of its plans.

Since its inception , the Company has obtained its liquidity principally from approximately $1.8 million principal amount of cash advances from an affiliate of Craig Sizer, the Chairman and CEO and one of the Company's principal shareholders.  The Company has executed promissory notes totaling approximately $1.8 million as of June 30, 2011, with CLSS Holdings, LLC (“CLSS”).  (See Note 3) .

The ability of the Company to continue as a going concern is dependent upon its ability to successfully accomplish the plans described in the preceding paragraph and eventually secure other sources of financing in addition to those funds provided by Mr. Sizer's affiliate and attain profitable operations. The accompanying financial statements do not include any adjustments that might be necessary if the Company is unable to continue as a going concern.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect reported amounts of assets and liabilities, disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
 
Cash Equivalents

For purposes of reporting cash flows, the Company considers all short-term investments with an original maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalent.
 
 
6

 
 
NOTE 2 – SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued)

Revenue Recognition

Certain product sales are subject to rights of return.  Such rights include the right to return defective items within 30 days and with certain large accounts a right to return unsold product.  For products sold where the buyer has the right to return the product, the Company recognizes revenue at the time of sale only if (1) the Company’s price to the buyer is substantially fixed or determinable at the date of sale, (2) the buyer has paid the Company, or the buyer is obligated to pay the seller and the obligation is not contingent on resale of the product, (3) the buyer’s obligation to the Company would not be changed in the event of theft or physical destruction or damage of the product, (4) the buyer acquiring the product for resale has economic substance apart from that provided by the seller, (5) the Company does not have significant obligations for future performance to directly bring about resale of the product by the buyer, and (6) the amount of future returns can be reasonably estimated. The Company recognizes such product revenues when either it has met all the above criteria, including the ability to reasonably estimate the right of return of unsold items, or when it can reasonably estimate that the return privilege has expired.

Product Sales —  Revenue from sales of the Company’s products is recorded when title and risk of loss have passed to the buyer and provided the criteria for revenue recognition are met. The Company sells its products to individual consumers and resellers upon receipt of a written order. The Company has a limited return policy for defective items that requires the customer to give the Company notice within 30 days after receipt of the product; however, such risk is passed to the manufacturer and therefore the Company recognizes revenue at the time of delivery without providing any reserve. For sales made by certain large accounts with a right to return unsold items, the Company provides for a reserve for the estimated amount of unsold items.
 
Concentration of Credit Risk

Financial instruments which subject the Company to concentrations of credit risk include cash and cash equivalents. The Company maintains its cash in well-known banks selected based upon management's assessment of the banks’ financial stability. Balances may periodically exceed the $250,000 federal depository insurance limit; however, the Company has not experienced any losses on deposits. The Company extends credit based on an evaluation of the customer's financial condition, without collateral. Exposure to losses on receivables is principally dependent on each customer's financial condition. The Company monitors its exposure for credit losses and maintains allowances for anticipated losses, as required.

Inventories
 
Inventories are stated at the lower of cost (on a first-in, first-out basis) or market value. The stated cost is comprised of finished goods of non-invasive thermometers.  Reserves, if necessary, are recorded to reduce inventory to market value based on assumptions about consumer demand, current inventory levels and product life cycles for the various inventory items. These assumptions are evaluated quarterly and are based on the Company’s business plan and from feedback from customers and the product development team; however, as the Company has a fairly limited operating history, estimates can vary significantly.

Reserves for Warranty

The Company records a reserve at the time product revenue is recorded based on historical rates.  The reserve is reviewed during the year and is adjusted, if appropriate, to reflect new product offerings or changes in experience. Actual warranty claims are tracked by product line. The warranty reserve was approximately $1,000 at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010.

Fixed Assets

Fixed assets are stated at cost, less accumulated depreciation. Depreciation is provided principally on the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets, which is generally 3 to 10 years. The cost of repairs and maintenance is charged to expense as incurred. Expenditures for property betterments and renewals are capitalized. Upon sale or other disposition of a depreciable asset, cost and accumulated depreciation are removed from the accounts and any gain or loss is reflected in other income or expense.

The Company will periodically evaluate whether events and circumstances have occurred that may warrant revision of the estimated useful lives of fixed assets or whether the remaining balance of fixed assets should be evaluated for possible impairment. The Company  uses an estimate of the related undiscounted cash flows over the remaining life of the fixed assets in measuring their recoverability.
 
 
7

 
 
NOTE 2 – SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued)

Advertising Costs

Advertising costs are expensed as incurred.
 
 Shipping and Handling

Costs incurred by the Company for shipping and handling are included in costs of revenues.

Income Taxes

The Company accounts for income taxes under ASC 740, formerly Financial Accounting Standards No. 109 "Accounting for Income Taxes". Under ASC 740, deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period, which includes the enactment date.

In June 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued FASB Interpretation No. 48 (FIN-48), Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes--An interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109 and codified into ASC 740. FIN-48 clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in an entity's financial statements in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No.109, Accounting for Income Taxes. This Interpretation prescribed a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. In addition, FIN-48 provides guidance on de-recognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure, and transition. The Company adopted the provisions of FIN-48 and they had no impact on its financial position, results of operations, and cash flows.

Based on its evaluation, the Company has concluded that there are no significant uncertain tax positions requiring recognition in its financial statements. The Company's evaluation was performed for the tax years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009 for U.S. Federal Income Tax, for the State of Florida Corporate Income Tax, the years which remain subject to examination by major tax jurisdictions as of December 31, 2010 and 2009.

Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance when, in the opinion of management, it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are adjusted for the effects of changes in tax laws and rates on the date of enactment.
  
Research and Development Expense

Costs related to research and development, which primarily consists of salaries and benefits, stock compensation and consulting, are charged to expense as incurred

Patents

We capitalize external costs, such as filing fees and associated attorney fees, incurred to obtain issued patents and patent license rights. We expense costs associated with maintaining and defending patents subsequent to their issuance in the period incurred. We amortize capitalized patent costs for internally generated patents on a straight-line basis over five to  ten years, which represents the estimated useful lives of the patents. The estimated useful life for internally generated patents is based on our assessment of such factors as the length of license agreements, if any, for such patents and the expected product life of the product. We assess the potential impairment to all capitalized net patent costs when events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of our patents  may not be recoverable. As of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, patents totaled $46,647 and $48,824, respectively, net of accumulated amortization of $3,127 and $0, respectively.
 
 
8

 
 
NOTE 2 – SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued)

Basic and Diluted Net Loss Per Share
 
The Company computes net income (loss) per share in accordance with ASC Topic 260, Earning per Share, formerly Statement of Accounting Standards SFAS No. 128, "Earnings per Share", which requires presentation of both basic and diluted earnings per share ("EPS") on the face of the income statement. Basic EPS is computed by dividing net income (loss) available to common shareholders (numerator) before and after discontinued operations, by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding (denominator) during the period, including contingently issuable shares where the contingency has been resolved. Diluted EPS gives effect to all dilutive potential common shares outstanding during the period using the treasury stock method and convertible preferred stock using the if-converted method. In computing diluted EPS, the average stock price for the period is used in determining the number of shares assumed to be purchased from the exercise of stock options or warrants. Diluted loss per share excludes all dilutive potential shares as their effect is anti-dilutive. For the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, outstanding stock options, warrants, and shares issuable upon conversion of convertible notes were anti-dilutive because of net losses, and, as such, their effect has not been included in the calculation of diluted net loss per share. Potentially dilutive shares of 18.1 million and 13.7 million, respectively, have been excluded from the denominator in the computation of diluted EPS for three and six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively, because they are anti-dilutive.

Stock Based Compensation

The Company applies the fair value method of ASC 718, Share Based Payment, formerly Statement of Financial Accounting Standards ("SFAS") No. l23R "Accounting for Stock Based Compensation", in accounting for its stock based compensation. This standard states that compensation cost is measured at the grant date based on the value of the award and is recognized over the service period, which is usually the vesting period, if any. As the Company does not have sufficient, reliable and readily determinable values relating to its common stock, the Company has used the stock value pursuant to its most recent private sale of stock by an affiliate of our CEO, for purposes of valuing stock based compensation. The Company believes that the market price of the Company's stock is not indicative of value as the stock is not widely held and trades infrequently.
 
NOTE 3 – NOTES PAYABLE -RELATED PARTY

Notes payable consists of the following:
 
 
June 30, 2011
   
December 31,
2010
 
Secured Convertible Promissory Note - CLSS Holdings, LLC, dated September 8, 2009.  Note accrues interest at 9% per annum, due and payable on August 1, 2012
 
$
407,151
   
$
407,151
 
Secured Convertible Promissory Note - CLSS Holdings, LLC, dated December 7, 2009.  Note accrues interest at 9% per annum, due and payable on August 1, 2012
   
117,164
     
117,164
 
Secured Convertible Promissory Note - CLSS Holdings, LLC, dated April 6, 2010.  Note accrues interest at 9% per annum, due and payable on August 1, 2012
   
245,116
     
245,116
 
Secured Convertible Promissory Note - CLSS Holdings, LLC, dated June 30, 2010.  Note accrues interest at 9% per annum, due and payable on August 1, 2012
   
223,500
     
223,500
 
Convertible Promissory Note - Craig Sizer dated June 30, 2010, Note accrues interest at 7.5% per annum due and payable on August 1, 2012
   
225,000
     
225,000
 
Convertible Promissory Note - Keith Houlihan dated June 30, 2010, Note accrues interest at 7.5% per annum due and payable on August 1, 2012
   
239,994
     
239,994
 
Secured Convertible Promissory Note - CLSS Holdings, LLC, dated September 30, 2010.  Note accrues interest at 9% per annum, due and payable on October 1, 2011
   
181,000
     
181,000
 
Secured Convertible Promissory Note - CLSS Holdings, LLC, dated March 12, 2011.  Note accrues interest at 9% per annum, due and payable on March 11, 2012
   
367,000
     
 
Secured Convertible Promissory Note - CLSS Holdings, LLC, dated June 30, 2011.  Note accrues interest at 9% per annum, due and payable on June 30, 2012
   
220,000
     
 
    Total Notes
   
2,225,925
     
1,638,925
 
Other advances from CLSS Holdings, Inc, LLC, not evidenced by a promissory Note
   
85,787
     
286,704
 
     
2,311,712
   
$
1,925,629
 
Less: Current portion
   
853,787
     
1,925,629
 
   
$
1,458,925
   
$
 

The secured convertible promissory notes above are secured by substantially all the assets of the Company and are convertible, at the holder's option, into common shares of the Company at a fixed conversion price ranging from  $0.25 to $0.50 per share.   CLSS Holdings, LLC is wholly owned by the Company's CEO who also is a principal shareholder of the Company.

On June 30, 2010, the Company evidenced its obligations to pay accrued salaries to its Chief Executive Officer and its President in the amount of $225,000 and $239,994, respectively, by issuing promissory notes.  The notes are due on August 1, 2011 bearing an interest rate of 7.5% per annum. At the executives’ option, the notes can be converted into common shares at a fixed conversion price $0.50 per share.

As of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, interest accrued on the notes amounted to $187,052 and $107,411, respectively.
 
 
9

 
 
The above notes, with the exception of the March 11, 2011 note,  were amended on December 20, 2010 to remove the variable component of the notes which allowed for the conversion of the above notes into common shares of the Company at the lesser of $0.25 or a 45% discount to the average closing bid price of its common stock for the three trading days prior to the conversion. There was no beneficial conversion feature associated with these notes as the variable and fixed conversion price of these notes were in excess of the fair market value of the Company's common stock.

On August 1, 2011, the Company and an affiliate of Craig Sizer agreed to further extend the maturity dates of the Secured Promissory Notes dated September 8, 2009, December 7, 2009, April 6, 2010 and June 30, 2010 to August 1, 2012.
 
Also on August 1, 2011, the Company, Craig Sizer and Keith Houlihan agreed to extend the maturity dates of the convertible Promissory Notes dated June 30, 2010 to August 1, 2012.

Maturities of notes payable for the years subsequent to December 31, 2010 are as follows:
 
Year
 
Amount
 
2011
   
1,638,925
 
2012
   
587,000
 
Thereafter
   
 
   
$
2,225,925
 

NOTE 4 – COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

From time to time, the Company may become involved in various lawsuits and legal proceedings, which arise in the ordinary course of business. However, litigation is subject to inherent uncertainties, and an adverse result in these or other matters may arise from time to time that may harm its business.

The Company has employment agreements with three executive officers: the President, the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Technology Officer.  The President and Chief Executive Officer have deferred their salary and all three have deferred their bonuses until such time as the Company receives financing and or there is a change of control. As of June 30, 2011, the Company has deferred approximately $525,250 in salaries and $302,000 in bonuses under these agreements.
 

 
10

 
 
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
 
The following discussion highlights the principal factors that have affected our financial condition, results of operations, liquidity and capital resources for the periods described. This discussion should be read in conjunction with our Consolidated Financial Statements and the related notes in Item 8 of this report. This discussion contains forward-looking statements. Please see “Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements” for the risks, uncertainties and assumptions associated with these forward-looking statements.
 
OVERVIEW

We design, develop, market and sell a line of non-contact infrared thermometers principally for consumer home healthcare for children and, under the “ThermoPet” brand name, for pet dogs.  Our research efforts are focused on a second generation product with improved accuracy, and if our development is successful we intend to introduce our second generation product line into the consumer market as well as launch it commercially into the “professional” market (medical and veterinary professionals and institutions), a market in which we conducted limited test-marketing during 2010. 

For the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2011, our thermometer for pet dogs accounted for 84.3% and 27.1%, respectively, of all thermometer unit sales and 86.0% and 41.7%, respectively, of our gross revenues of $57,967 and $32,165, respectively.  For the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2011, our thermometer for children accounted for 10.9% and 70.8%, respectively, of all thermometer unit sales and 34.8% and 53.3%, respectively, of our gross revenues of $57,967 and $32,165, respectively.  For the six months ended June 30, 2011, test-marketing of our “professional” model accounted for 2.1% of unit sales and 5.0% of gross revenues.   We market our products principally on the Internet on Amazon.com and in the online catalogs of Frontgate.com (ThermoPet model only), and Hammacher.com (ThermoPet model only), Amazon and Hammacher.com accounted for 40.9% and  25.0% of our total sales for the six months ended June 30, 2011.  We have agreements with a distributor, commissioned independent sales representatives, and resellers.

 Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
 
The methods, estimates and judgments we use in applying our accounting policies have a significant impact on the results we report in our financial statements and which we discussed above in this Item 2. Some of our accounting policies require us to make difficult and subjective judgments, often as a result of the need to make estimates of matters that are inherently uncertain. We believe our critical accounting policies are those described below.

Revenue Recognition

The Company recognizes revenue at the time the following criteria are met: (1) persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists; (2) delivery has occurred or services have been rendered; (3) the fee is fixed or determinable; and (4) collectibility is reasonably assured.

Certain product sales are subject to rights of return. Such rights include the right to return defective items within 30 days and with certain large accounts a right to return unsold product.  For products sold where the buyer has the right to return the product, the Company recognizes revenue at the time of sale only if (1) the Company’s price to the buyer is substantially fixed or determinable at the date of sale, (2) the buyer has paid the Company, or the buyer is obligated to pay the seller and the obligation is not contingent on resale of the product, (3) the buyer’s obligation to the Company would not be changed in the event of theft or physical destruction or damage of the product, (4) the buyer acquiring the product for resale has economic substance apart from that provided by the seller, (5) the Company does not have significant obligations for future performance to directly bring about resale of the product by the buyer, and (6) the amount of future returns can be reasonably estimated. The Company recognizes such product revenues when either it has met all the above criteria, including the ability to reasonably estimate future returns, when it can reasonably estimate that the return privilege has expired.

Product Sales —  Revenue from sales of the Company’s products is recorded when title and risk of loss have passed to the buyer and provided the criteria for revenue recognition are met. The Company sells its products to individual consumers and resellers upon receipt of a written order. The Company has a limited return policy for defective items that requires that the customer give the Company notice within 30 days after receipt of the product; however, such risk is passed to the manufacturer and therefore, the Company recognizes revenue at the time of delivery without providing any reserve. For sales made by certain large accounts with a right to return unsold items, the Company provides for a reserve for the estimated amount of unsold items.
 
 
11

 
 
Inventories
 
Inventories are stated at the lower of cost (on a first-in, first-out basis) or market value. The stated cost is comprised of finished goods of non-invasive medical devices. Reserves, if necessary, are recorded to reduce inventory to market value based on assumptions about consumer demand, current inventory levels and product life cycles for the various inventory items, as follows:

·  
Consumer demand – our products have only recently come to market, with the first sale in September 2009, Marketing efforts have been limited during 2010 due to our limited financial resources and the expected redesign of our product line in 2011 via our second generation models.  We do not want to deplete our inventory of current products too quickly in order to avoid an out-of-stock condition before our new line is ready.  We anticipate that we will reduce our retail price to sell the remaining inventory in bulk sometime prior to the expected release of our new line in 2011.  We anticipate that the discounted price will be well above our cost.

·  
Current inventory levels – we have approximately 11,500 units remaining as of June 30, 2011. We sold 1,165 units January 1, 2011 to June 30, 2011, which is a fairly consistent sales rate over the preceding period.  At this rate, we have approximately 48 months of inventory on hand.  However, as noted above, it is our intent is to sell the remainder at a discount, but above cost, prior to our new product line becoming available.

·  
Product life cycles – although we are redesigning our current line of products, we still consider them readily marketable consumer products.

Stock-Based Compensation

The Company applies the fair value method of ASC 718, Share Based Payment, formerly Statement of Financial Accounting Standards ("SFAS") No. 123R "Accounting for Stock Based Compensation", in accounting for its stock based compensation. This standard states that compensation cost is measured at the grant date based on the value of the award and is recognized over the service period, which is usually the vesting period, if any. As the Company does not have sufficient, reliable and readily determinable values relating to its common stock, the Company has used the stock value pursuant to its most recent private sale of stock for purposes of valuing stock based compensation. The Company believes that the market price of the Company's stock is not indicative of value as the stock is not widely held and trades infrequently.

Income Taxes

The Company accounts for income taxes under ASC 740, formerly Financial Accounting Standards No. 109 "Accounting for Income Taxes". Under ASC 740, deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period, which includes the enactment date.

In June 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued FASB Interpretation No. 48 (FIN-48), Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes--An interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109 and codified into ASC 740. FIN-48 clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in an entity's financial statements in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes. This Interpretation prescribed a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. In addition, FIN-48 provides guidance on derecognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure, and transition. The Company adopted the provisions of FIN-48 and they had no impact on its financial position, results of operations, and cash flows.

Based on its evaluation, the Company has concluded that there are no significant uncertain tax positions requiring recognition in its financial statements. The Company's evaluation was performed for the tax years ended December 31, 2010 for U.S. Federal Income Tax, for the State of Florida Corporate Income Tax, the years which remain subject to examination by major tax jurisdictions as of December 31, 2010.  
 
 
12

 
 
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
 
The following table summarizes our consolidated operating results as a percentage of net sales revenue for the periods indicated:
 
   
Three Months Ended
 June 30,
 
   
2011
   
2010
 
Net sales revenue
   
100.0
%
   
100.0
%
                 
Costs and expenses:
               
Cost of goods sold
   
93.7
     
76.7
 
Research and development
   
662.2
     
108.5
 
Selling, general and administrative
   
2,660.3
     
584.3
 
Depreciation and Amortization
   
18.0
     
0.6
 
     
3,434.2
     
770.1
 
                 
Loss from operations
   
(3334.2
)
   
(770.1
)
                 
Other income (expense):
               
Interest expense
   
(440.3
)
   
(36.1
)
                 
Loss before provision for income taxes
   
(3,774.5
)
   
(706.1
)
Provision for income taxes
   
     
 
                 
Net loss
   
(3,774.5
)%
   
(706.1
)%
 
Results of Operations
 
Three Months Ended June 30, 2011 compared to the Three Months Ended June 30, 2010

Revenues:  Revenues for the three months ended June 30, 2011 were approximately $10,000 as compared to approximately $47,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2010.  The decrease was attributable to the gradual phasing out of the current product line.

Cost of Revenues: Cost of revenues, which consist of product, shipping and other costs, totaled approximately $9,600 for the three months ended June 30, 2011 as compared to approximately $24,500 of such costs during the same period in 2010.   The decrease is primarily a result of the decrease in sales volumes noted above.

Gross Profit: Gross profit was approximately $643 for the three months ended as compared to approximately 11,000 during the same period in 2010, due primarily to the reasons stated above.

Operating Expenses: Operating expenses consist of general and administrative expenses, stock compensation, depreciation, research and development, and selling expenses.  Operating expenses remained consistent from period to period and totaled approximately $272,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2011 as compared to approximately $274,000 for the same period in 2010.  

Net Loss: Net loss for the three months ended June 30, 2011 was approximately $341,000 compared to approximately $314,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2010 an increase of approximately $27,000 primarily as a result of a decrease in gross profit due to declining sales volume.

Six Months Ended June 30, 2011 compared to the Six Months Ended June 30, 2010

Revenues:  Revenues for the six months ended June 30, 2011 were approximately $32,000 as compared to approximately $58,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2010.  The decrease was attributable to the gradual phasing out of the current product line.

Cost of Revenues: Cost of revenues, which consist of product, shipping and other costs, totaled approximately $25,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2011 as compared to approximately $53,000 of such costs during the same period in 2010.   The decrease is primarily a result of the decrease in sales volumes noted above.

Gross Profit: Gross profit was approximately $7,700 for the six months ended as compared to approximately $5,300 during the same period in 2010, due primarily to the reasons stated above and due to the 2010 margins impacted by higher transportation and related costs incurred in bringing inventory to the US from China.

Operating Expenses: Operating expenses consist of general and administrative expenses, stock compensation, depreciation, research and development, and selling expenses.  Operating costs totaled approximately $656,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2011 as compared to approximately $1.2 million for the same period in 2010. The decrease was due to primarily to stock compensation expense of $734,750 recorded during 2010 with no corresponding expense in 2011. 

Net Loss: Net loss for the six months ended June 30, 2011 was approximately $728,000 compared to approximately $1.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2010 an increase of approximately $517,000 primarily as a result of a an increase in operating expenses as described above.
 
 
13

 
 
Financial Condition

June 30, 2011 (unaudited) compared to December 31, 2010

Assets.  At June 30,2011 as compared December 31, 2010 our total assets decreased by approximately $7,000 or 32.4%, to approximately $270,000. This was primarily attributable to an decrease of approximately $138,000 in inventory, a $5,000 decrease in accounts receivable, a $3,000 decrease in fixed and other asset. offset by a $418,000 increase in cash.

Liabilities.  At June 30, 2011, our total liabilities increased by approximately $7,223,,000 or 26.94%, to approximately $3.04 million, attributable primarily to an increase of approximately $387,000 in borrowings from an affiliate of Craig Sizer, our Chairman and CEO and principal shareholder, increases of approximately $193,000 in accrued salaries and bonuses owed to our Management as of June 30, 2011 and an increase in accounts payable and other liabilities of approximately $63,000

Stockholders’ Deficit.  At June 30, 2011, our stockholders’ deficit increased by approximately $728,000 , or 30.2%, to approximately $3.81 million, primarily due to our net loss of approximately $728,000.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

At June 30, 2011 our cash on hand was approximately $20,000.

During 2009, 2010 and 2011 we obtained our liquidity principally from approximately $1.8 million principal amount of cash advances from an affiliate of Craig Sizer, our Chairman and CEO and one of our principal shareholders.  The Company has executed promissory notes totaling approximately $1.8 million as of June 30, 2011, with CLSS Holdings, LLC (“CLSS”). Each note (a) bears 9% annual interest (20% upon the occurrence, and during the continuance, of an event of default), is convertible into our common stock at a fixed conversion prices ranging from $0.25 to $0.50, and is not prepayable by us, and (b) is subject to a security agreement under which all of our assets secure our loan repayment obligation.  The notes made on or before September 30, 2010 originally were  due and payable between March 7, 2011 and October 1, 2011; however, by amendments made on March 10, 2011, the maturities (March 7, 2010 and April 6, 2010) of the 2009 notes and the April and June 2010 notes were extended to August 1, 2011 and on August 1, 2011 by further amendment the maturities were extended to August 1, 2012.

Although we intend to increase our revenue by engaging in more aggressive sales, marketing and advertising activity designed to increase awareness of our products, we still need substantial additional capital to finance our business activities on an ongoing basis, as our revenue is insufficient to fund our operations.

Mr. Sizer has advised us that, absent the Company completing a debt or equity financing, he intends, through his affiliate, to provide additional loans to us of up to an additional $600,000, which is sufficient cash for an additional 9 months of operations at our current burn rate of approximately $65,000 per month.  We have not yet taken any steps to initiate any debt or equity financing, so we are relying on Mr. Sizer for additional funding.  However, even though Mr. Sizer is our CEO and our controlling shareholder and has been funding us for approximately two years, his verbal statement of intent to have his affiliate provide additional funding to us is not a binding agreement and therefore it is not legally enforceable and cannot be relied upon.  In the absence of a cash infusion by Mr. Sizer’s affiliate, based on our current sales rate, our current cash on hand would be depleted by the end of August 2011 and our ability to conduct business would be materially adversely effected.

Even if we do receive additional financing through Mr. Sizer, we still will require  substantial additional funds to finance our business activities on an ongoing basis. We are seeking substantial additional funds to finance our business activities on an ongoing basis.   However, we do not have any commitments or arrangements with any person or entity to obtain any equity or debt financing, and there can be no assurance that the additional financing we require would be available on reasonable terms, if at all; and if available, any such financing likely would result in a material and substantial dilution of the equity interests of our current shareholders.  The unavailability of such additional financing could require us to delay, scale back or terminate our business activities, which would have a material adverse effect on our viability and prospects.  We also intend to seek to have our common stock listed on the OTC Bulletin Board, which we believe would make it easier for us to raise capital from institutional investors and others. However, we do not have any commitments or arrangements to obtain any additional equity capital, and there can be no assurance that the additional financing we require would be available on reasonable terms, if at all.  The unavailability of additional financing could require us to delay, scale back or terminate our acquisition efforts as well as our own business activities, which would have a material adverse effect on our company and its viability and prospects.
 
 
14

 
 
Summary of Cash Flow for the six months ended June 30, 2011

Our cash flows for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010:

   
Six Months Ended
June 30, 2011
 
   
2011
   
2010
 
Net cash (used) by operating activities
 
$
(365,808
)
 
$
(413,318
)
Net cash (used) by investing activities
   
(2,680
)
   
(30,418
)
Net cash  provided by financing activities
 
$
387,083
   
$
469,138
 

Operating Activities

Our total cash used by operating activities decreased by approximately $48,000 or 11.5% to approximately $366,000 for the six months ended, compared to approximately $413,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2010. The increase is due to various factors, but primarily due to a lower loss during the six months ended June 30, 2011 as compared to 2010

Investing Activities

Our total cash used by investing activities decreased by approximately $28,000, to  approximately $3,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2011, compared to approximately $30,000 for the six months  June 30, 2010. The decrease is due to less capitalized intangible patent assets, put into service during the period as compared to the same period a year ago.

Financing Activities

Our total cash provided for financing activities decreased by approximately $82,000, or 17.5%, to approximately $387,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2011, compared to approximately $469,000 for the six months June 30, 2010. The decrease is primarily due to a decrease in funds borrowed from an affiliate of Craig Sizer, our Chairman and CEO and principal shareholder and by a decrease in proceeds of approximately $14,000 from the sale of our common stock to an affiliate of one of our distributors.

Current Commitments for Expenditures

Our current cash commitments for expenditures are mainly operational and SEC compliance in nature. We seek to use current revenue to pay vendors for materials for contracts, for payroll, and related employment expenditures (i.e. benefits).

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We do not have any off balance sheet arrangements that are reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on our financial condition, revenues, and results of operations, liquidity or capital expenditures.

 
15

 
 
Cautionary Note Regarding Forward Looking Statements

This report contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 including its liquidity.  Forward-looking statements can be identified by words such as “anticipates,” “intends,” “plans,” “seeks,” “believes,” “estimates,” “expects” and similar references to future periods.

Forward-looking statements are based on our current expectations and assumptions regarding our business, the economy and other future conditions.  Because forward-looking statements relate to the future, they are subject to inherent uncertainties, risks and changes in circumstances that are difficult to predict.  Our actual results may differ materially from those contemplated by the forward-looking statements.  We caution you therefore against relying on any of these forward-looking statements.  They are neither statements of historical fact nor guarantees or assurances of future performance.  Important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those in the forward-looking statements include the conditions of the global credit and capital markets.

Further information on our risk factors is contained in our filings with the SEC, including our 2010 annual report on Form 10-K filed on April 14, 2011.  Any forward-looking statement made by us in this report speaks only as of the date on which it is made.  Factors or events that could cause our actual results to differ may emerge from time to time, and it is not possible for us to predict all of them.  We undertake no obligation to publicly update any forward-looking statement, whether as a result of new information, future developments or otherwise, except as may be required by law.
 
Item 3.
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.

Not applicable to smaller reporting companies.
Item 4.
Controls and Procedures.

Not applicable to smaller reporting companies.
Item 4T.
Controls and Procedures.

Disclosure Controls. We carried out an evaluation with the participation of our Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer, required by Rule 13a-15 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Exchange Act.  Based on their evaluation, our management has concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of the end of the period covered by this report to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms and is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

Changes in Internal Controls Over Financial Reporting.  There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act that occurred during the period covered by this report that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
 
 
16

 
 
PART II – OTHER INFORMATION
 
Item 1.
Legal Proceedings.
 
We are not currently a party in any legal proceeding or governmental proceeding nor are we currently aware of any pending legal proceeding or governmental proceeding proposed to be initiated against us except as described below. There are no proceedings in which any of our current directors, executive officers or affiliates, or any registered or beneficial shareholder, is an adverse party or has a material interest adverse to us.

On October 26, 2010, we filed a complaint against American Scientific Resources, Incorporated and Kidz-Med, Inc. (collectively “American Scientific”) in the United Stated District Court, Southern District of Florida. On November 18, 2010, American Scientific filed its answer, affirmative defenses and counterclaim. On December 9, 2010, we answered American Scientific’s counterclaim.  On January 27, 2010, we filed an amended complaint adding as defendants Christopher F. Tirotta (American Scientific’s CEO), Rycom Electron Technology Limited and another company.  On February 7, 2011, American Scientific answered our amended complaint and asserted affirmative defenses and a counterclaim, and on February 28, 2011 we answered.

In our amended complaint, we allege that American Scientific, a competitor selling non-contact thermometers for human use, wrongfully obtained proprietary non-contact infrared thermometer technology from us and used this technology to manufacture its own thermometers through Rycom, in violation of the exclusive manufacturing agreement we have with Rycom and in violation of an issued U.S. design patent that we hold, and that Rycom wrongfully manufactured and sold thermometers to American Scientific.  We asserted claims of patent infringement, false designation of origin and trade dress infringement under Federal law. We also asserted claims for intentional interference with contract, intentional interference with business relationship, conversion, and breach of contract under Florida state law. We are seeking a permanent injunction to prevent Rycom’s continued manufacture and distribution of American Scientific’s thermometers, and for money damages. If we succeed on our claim of willful and deliberate violation of our patent, we may be entitled to treble damages.

American Scientific has denied any wrongdoing, and has asserted as a defense that Rycom independently developed the disputed thermometer technology and design, that Rycom has valid European, Chinese and U.S. design patents on the thermometers it manufactured, and that we obtained our U.S. design patent fraudulently. American Scientific seeks to have our subject United States design patent declared invalid and unenforceable, and in its counterclaim it seeks compensation for its attorneys’ fees.  We have not yet served our amended complaint on Rycom.

The Court has ordered  the matter submitted to mediation and on March 14, 2011 a mediator was designated.  This case is in the pre-discovery stage.  A declaration by the Court that our design patent is invalid or unenforceable could have a material and adverse effect on our business.
 
In May 2010 Registrant reached an agreement with each of the defendants who entered an appearance in this case. Registrant agreed to dismiss without prejudice (1) each of the answering defendants (with the exception of Greenwood Group, who was dismissed with prejudice), with each party bearing its own costs and attorneys' fees and, (2) foreign defendant Rycom Electron Technology, which was never served and did not enter an appearance.

Item 1A.   
Risk Factors.
 
Not applicable to smaller reporting companies.
Item 2.
Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.
 
None

Item 3.
Defaults Upon Senior Securities.
 
None
 
Item 4.
(Removed and Reserved).
 
Item 5.
Other Information.
 
None

Item 6.
Exhibits.

Exhibit
     
Incorporated by Reference
 
Filed or Furnished
#
 
Exhibit Description
 
Form
 
Date
 
Number
 
Herewith
10.23   Note Extension Agreement for note dated April 6, 2010 with CLSS Holdings LLC dated August 1, 2011               Filed
10.24   Note Extension Agreement for note dated December 7, 2009 with CLSS Holdings LLC dated August 1, 2011               Filed
10.25   Note Extension Agreement for note dated June 30, 2010 with CLSS Holdings LLC dated August 1, 2011               Filed
10.26  
Note Extension Agreement for note dated September 8, 2009 with CLSS Holdings LLC dated August 1, 2011
              Filed
10.27   Note Extension Agreement with Craig Sizer dated August 1, 2011               Filed
10.28   Note Extension Agreement with Keith Houlihan dated August 1, 2011               Filed
10.29  
$220,000 Secured Convertible Promissory Note dated June 30, 2011 to CLSS Holdings LLC
              Filed
31.1
 
Certification of Principal Financial Officer (Section 302)
             
Filed
31.2
 
Certification of Principal Financial Officer (Section 302)
             
Filed
32.1
 
Certification of Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer (Section 906)
             
Furnished
EX-101.INS   XBRL INSTANCE DOCUMENT               Filed
EX-101.SCH   XBRL TAXONOMY EXTENSION SCHEMA DOCUMENT               Filed
EX-101.CAL   XBRL TAXONOMY EXTENSION CALCULATION LINKBASE               Filed
EX-101.DEF   XBRL TAXONOMY EXTENSION DEFINITION LINKBASE               Filed
EX-101.LAB   XBRL TAXONOMY EXTENSION LABELS LINKBASE               Filed
EX-101.PRE   XBRL TAXONOMY EXTENSION PRESENTATION LINKBASE               Filed
 
Copies of this report (including the financial statements) and any of the exhibits referred to above will be furnished at no cost to our shareholders who make a written request to Sanomedics International Holdings Inc., 80 SW 8th Street, Suite 2180, Miami, Florida, 33180.
 
 
17

 
 
SIGNATURES
 
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

   
Sanomedics International Holdings, Inc.
     
August 16, 2011
  
/s/ Craig Sizer
   
Craig Sizer
   
Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
     
August 16, 2011
 
/s/ Steven L. Relis 
   
Steven L. Relis
   
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)
 










18