PGT Innovations, Inc. - FORM 10-Q

PGT Innovations, Inc. - FORM 10-Q - August 12, 2011

Attached files

Attached files

PGT Innovations, Inc. Reports

Attached files

PGT Innovations, Inc. Reports

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

file	filename
EXCEL - IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT - PGT Innovations, Inc.	Financial_Report.xls
EX-32.1 - CERT - PGT Innovations, Inc.	dex321.htm
EX-31.2 - CERT - PGT Innovations, Inc.	dex312.htm
EX-31.1 - CERT - PGT Innovations, Inc.	dex311.htm

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

x	QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended July 2, 2011

¨	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from to

Commission file number 000-52059

PGT, Inc.

1070 Technology Drive

North Venice, FL 34275

Registrant’s telephone number: 941-480-1600


State of Incorporation		IRS Employer Identification No.
Delaware		20-0634715

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x No ¨*

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of accelerated filer and large accelerated filer in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No x

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.

Common Stock, $0.01 par value – 53,670,135 shares, as of July 29, 2011.

PGT, INC.

TABLE OF CONTENTS


		Page Number
Part I. Financial Information

Item 1.	Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)
	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations		3
	Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets		4
	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows		5
	Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements		6

Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations		18

Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk		26

Item 4.	Controls and Procedures		26

Part II. Other Information

Item 1.	Legal Proceedings		27

Item 1A.	Risk Factors		27

Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use Of Proceeds		27

Item 3.	Defaults Upon Senior Securities		27

Item 4.	Removed and Reserved		27

Item 5.	Other Information		27

Item 6.	Exhibits		27

PART I — FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

PGT, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(in thousands, except per share amounts)


	Three Months Ended					Six Months Ended
	July 2,			July 3,		July 2,			July 3,
	2011			2010		2011			2010
	(unaudited)					(unaudited)
Net sales	$	45,171		$	49,006	$	85,816		$	89,522
Cost of sales		36,100			33,760		68,419			62,953


Gross margin		9,071			15,246		17,397			26,569

Selling, general and administrative expenses		12,597			13,904		25,631			25,833


(Loss) income from operations		(3,526	)		1,342		(8,234	)		736

Interest expense, net		1,050			1,264		2,173			2,738
Other expense (income), net		461			—		419			(20	)


(Loss) income before income taxes		(5,037	)		78		(10,826	)		(1,982	)

Income tax expense		—			77		—			77


Net (loss) income	$	(5,037	)	$	1	$	(10,826	)	$	(2,059	)


Net (loss) income per common share:
Basic	$	(0.09	)	$	0.00	$	(0.20	)	$	(0.04	)


Diluted	$	(0.09	)	$	0.00	$	(0.20	)	$	(0.04	)


Weighted average shares outstanding:
Basic		53,659			53,649		53,658			46,694


Diluted		53,659			54,334		53,658			46,694

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

PGT, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(in thousands except per share amounts)


	July 2, 2011			January 1, 2011
	(unaudited)

ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	7,677		$	22,012
Accounts receivable, net		18,565			13,687
Inventories		11,581			10,535
Prepaid expenses		1,104			881
Other current assets		3,341			3,589
Assets held for sale		—			657


Total current assets		42,268			51,361

Property, plant and equipment, net		50,697			52,863
Intangible assets, net		61,040			64,291
Deferred financing costs		1,838			59
Other assets, net		248			545


Total assets	$	156,091		$	169,119


LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities	$	15,396		$	16,696
Deferred income taxes		185			185
Current portion of long-term debt and capital lease obligations		1,296			245


Total current liabilities		16,877			17,126

Long-term debt and capital lease obligations		46,811			49,918
Deferred income taxes		17,130			17,130
Other liabilities		2,158			1,903


Total liabilities		82,976			86,077


Commitments and contingencies (Note 11)		—			—


Shareholders’ equity:
Preferred stock; par value $.01 per share; 10,000 shares authorized; none outstanding		—			—
Common stock; par value $.01 per share; 200,000 shares authorized; 53,670 and 53,670 shares issued and 53,659 and 53,654 shares outstanding at July 2, 2011 and January 1, 2011, respectively		537			537
Additional paid-in-capital, net of treasury stock		272,119			271,038
Accumulated other comprehensive loss		(1,426	)		(1,243	)
Accumulated deficit		(198,115	)		(187,290	)


Total shareholders’ equity		73,115			83,042


Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity	$	156,091		$	169,119

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

PGT, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(in thousands)


	Six Months Ended
	July 2, 2011			July 3, 2010
	(unaudited)

Cash flows from operating activities:
Net loss	$	(10,826	)	$	(2,059	)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:
Depreciation		3,774			4,895
Amortization		3,251			2,992
Provision for allowances of doubtful accounts		440			603
Amortization and write off of deferred financing costs		803			360
Stock-based compensation		1,081			973
Loss (gain) on disposal of assets		38			(2	)
Change in operating assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable		(4,959	)		(5,083	)
Inventories		(1,046	)		(1,639	)
Prepaid and other assets		107			3,406
Accounts payable, accrued and other liabilities		(1,401	)		263


Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities		(8,738	)		4,709


Cash flows from investing activities:
Purchases of property, plant and equipment		(1,652	)		(1,049	)
Proceeds from assets held for sale and sales of equipment		663			8
Net change in margin account for derivative financial instruments		(200	)		(371	)


Net cash used in investing activities		(1,189	)		(1,412	)


Cash flows from financing activities:
Net proceeds from issuance of common stock		—			27,257
Payments of long-term debt		(50,000	)		(15,000	)
Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt		48,000			—
Payments of financing costs		(2,352	)		(897	)
Acquisition of treasury stock		—			(4	)
Payments of capital leases		(56	)		(52	)


Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities		(4,408	)		11,304


Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents		(14,335	)		14,601
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period		22,012			7,417

Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	7,677		$	22,018

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

PGT, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(unaudited)

NOTE 1. BASIS OF PRESENTATION

The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of PGT, Inc. and its wholly-owned subsidiary, PGT Industries, Inc. (collectively the “Company”) after elimination of intercompany accounts and transactions. These statements have been prepared in accordance with the instructions to Form 10-Q and do not include all of the information and footnotes required by United States Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (“GAAP”) for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting only of normal recurring accruals) considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. Operating results for the interim period are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the remainder of the current year or for any future periods. Each of our Company’s fiscal quarters ended July 2, 2011 and July 3, 2010 consisted of 13 weeks.

The condensed consolidated balance sheet as of January 1, 2011 is derived from the audited consolidated financial statements but does not include all disclosures required by GAAP. The condensed consolidated balance sheet as of January 1, 2011 and the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements as of July 2, 2011, should be read in conjunction with the more detailed audited consolidated financial statements for the year ended January 1, 2011 included in the Company’s most recent annual report on Form 10-K. Accounting policies used in the preparation of these unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements are consistent with the accounting policies described in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in the Company’s Form 10-K.

NOTE 2. CONSOLIDATION AND RESTRUCTURINGS

On December 3, 2010, we announced that our Salisbury, North Carolina operations would be transferred to Venice, Florida to consolidate our window and door production at our Florida plant. All operations have been moved as of the end of the second quarter. As a result of this consolidation, we recorded consolidation charges of $1.4 million, which includes $0.1 million of severance expense and $1.3 million of moving expenses. The classification of these charges were $1.2 million within costs of goods sold and the remaining $0.2 million within selling, general and administrative expenses in the accompanying condensed consolidated statement of operations for the three months ended July 2, 2011. We recorded consolidation charges of $4.0 million, which includes $1.3 million of severance expense and $2.7 million of moving expenses. The classification of the charges were $3.3 million within costs of goods sold, and the remaining $0.7 million, within selling, general and administrative expenses in the accompanying condensed consolidated statement of operations for the six months ended July 2, 2011. The charges relate primarily to employee separation costs and moving expenses. The total charges recorded through July 2, 2011 for the consolidation are $6.1 million, $2.1 million having been recorded in December 2009, of which $0.1 million and $1.8 million are unpaid as of July 2, 2011 and January 1, 2011, respectively, and are classified in accounts payable and accrued liabilities within the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets. The unpaid severance expenses, as of July 2, 2011, is expected to be disbursed prior to the end of 2011. We anticipate incurring an additional $0.5 million of expense during the last six months of 2011, to complete the consolidation of the operations.

On September 24, 2009 and November 12, 2009, we announced restructurings based on the results of our continued analysis of target markets, internal structure, projected run-rate, and efficiency. The charges from these restructurings totaled $2.4 million, of which $0.1 million was unpaid as of July 3, 2010, and are classified within accounts payable and accrued liabilities in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets. The unpaid amount as of July 3, 2010 was disbursed in 2010.

The following table provides information with respect to our accrual for severance costs incurred in connection with the consolidation and restructuring costs:


	Beginning of Period		Charged to Expense		Disbursed in Cash			End of Period
(in thousands)

Three months ended July 2, 2011:
2010 Consolidation	$	1,359	$	114	$	(1,345	)	$	128

Three months ended July 3, 2010:
2009 Restructurings	$	238	$	—	$	(128	)	$	110

Six months ended July 2, 2011:
2010 Consolidation	$	1,812	$	1,294	$	(2,978	)	$	128

Six months ended July 3, 2010:
2009 Restructurings	$	898	$	—	$	(788	)	$	110

NOTE 3. WARRANTY

Most of our manufactured products are sold with warranties. Warranty periods, which vary by product component, generally range from 1 to 10 years. However, the majority of the products sold have warranties on components which range from 1 to 3 years. The reserve for warranties is based on management’s assessment of the cost per service call and the number of service calls expected to be incurred to satisfy warranty obligations on recorded net sales. The reserve is determined after assessing our warranty history and estimating our future warranty obligations.

The following table provides information with respect to our warranty accrual:


Accrued Warranty	Beginning of Period		Charged to Expense		Adjustments			Settlements			End of Period
(in thousands)
Three months ended July 2, 2011	$	3,860	$	678	$	64		$	(635	)	$	3,967
Three months ended July 3, 2010	$	3,844	$	734	$	108		$	(621	)	$	4,065
Six months ended July 2, 2011	$	4,103	$	1,287	$	(195	)	$	(1,228	)	$	3,967
Six months ended July 3, 2010	$	4,041	$	1,343	$	(42	)	$	(1,277	)	$	4,065

NOTE 4. INVENTORIES

Inventories consist principally of raw materials purchased for the manufacture of our products. We have limited finished goods inventory since all products are custom, made-to-order and usually ship upon completion. Finished goods inventory costs include direct materials, direct labor, and overhead. All inventories are stated at the lower of cost (first-in, first-out method) or market value. Inventories consisted of the following:


	July 2, 2011		January 1, 2011
	(in thousands)

Raw materials	$	10,142	$	9,273
Work in progress		323		293
Finished goods		1,116		969


	$	11,581	$	10,535

NOTE 5. STOCK COMPENSATION EXPENSE

We record compensation expense over an award’s vesting period based on the award’s fair value at the date of grant. We recorded compensation expense for stock based awards of $0.5 million for the second quarter of 2011 and $0.9 million for the second quarter of 2010. We recorded compensation expense for stock based awards of $1.1 million for the first six months of 2011 and $1.0 million for the first six months of 2010. As of July 2, 2011, there was $2.3 million and less than $0.1 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested stock option agreements and non-vested restricted share awards, respectively, including the repriced and exchanged options as described in Item 8, in footnote 17 under the titles “2010 Equity Exchange” and “2010 Issuer Tender Offer” in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended January 1, 2011, as filed on March 21, 2011. These costs are expected to be recognized in earnings on a straight-line basis over the weighted average remaining vesting period of 2.4 years.

New Issuances

In February 2011, we issued 30,000 options to certain non-executive employees of the Company. On each of five anniversary dates beginning February 2012, 20% of these options will vest. These options have an exercise price of $2.31 based on the NASDAQ market price of the underlying common stock on the close of business on the day the options were granted.

NOTE 6. 2010 RIGHTS OFFERING

On January 29, 2010, the Company filed Amendment No. 1 to the Registration Statement on Form S-1 filed on December 24, 2009 relating to a previously announced offering of rights to purchase 20,382,326 shares of the Company’s common stock with an aggregate value of approximately $30.6 million. The registration statement relating to the rights offering was declared effective by the United States Securities and Exchange Commission on February 10, 2010, and the Company distributed to each holder of record of the Company’s common stock as of close of business on February 8, 2010, at no charge, one (1) non-transferable subscription right for every one and three-quarters (1.75) shares of common stock held by such holder under the basic subscription privilege. Each whole subscription right entitled its holder to purchase one share of PGT’s common stock at the subscription price of $1.50 per share. The rights offering also contained an over-subscription privilege that permitted all basic subscribers to purchase additional shares of the Company’s common stock up to an amount equal to the amount available to each such holder under the basic subscription privilege. Shares issued to each participant in the over-subscription were determined by calculating each subscriber’s percentage of the total shares over-subscribed, multiplied by the number of shares available in the over-subscription privilege. The rights offering expired on March 12, 2010.

The rights offering was 90.0% subscribed resulting in the Company distributing 18,336,368 shares of its common stock, including 15,210,184 shares under the basic subscription privilege and 3,126,184 under the over-subscription privilege, representing a 74.6% basic subscription participation rate. There were requests for 3,126,184 shares under the over-subscription privilege representing an allocation rate of 100% to each over-subscriber. Of the 18,336,368 shares issued, 13,333,332 shares were issued to JLL Partners Fund IV (“JLL”) the Company’s majority shareholder, including 10,719,389 shares issued under the basic subscription privilege and 2,613,943 shares issued under the over-subscription privilege. Prior to the rights offering, JLL held 18,758,934 shares, or 52.6%, of the Company’s outstanding common stock. With the completion of the rights offering, the Company had 54,005,439 total shares of common stock outstanding, of which JLL holds 59.4%.

Net proceeds of $27.5 million from the rights offering were used to repay a portion of the outstanding indebtedness under our amended credit agreement in the amount of $15.0 million, and for general corporate purposes in the amount of $12.5 million.

NOTE 7. NET (LOSS) INCOME PER COMMON SHARE

Basic EPS is determined using the two-class method and is computed by dividing net income available to common shareholders by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted EPS reflects the dilutive effect of potential common shares from securities such as stock options.

Due to the net losses in the three and six month periods of 2011, as well as the six month period of 2010 presented herein, the dilutive effect of stock-based compensation plans is anti-dilutive. For the three months ended July 2, 2011 and July 3, 2010, there were 5,173,649 and 4,140,798 potential shares of common stock for the second quarter of 2011 and 2010, respectively relating to stock option agreements excluded from the computation of diluted EPS as their effect would have been anti-dilutive. For the six months ended July 2, 2011 and July 3, 2010, there were 5,119,824 and 2,709,748 potential shares of common stock, respectively, relating to stock option agreements excluded from the computation of diluted EPS as their effect would have been anti-dilutive.

The table below presents the calculation of EPS and a reconciliation of weighted average common shares used in the calculation of basic and diluted EPS for our Company:


	Three Months Ended					Six Months Ended
	July 2, 2011			July 3, 2010		July 2, 2011			July 3, 2010
	(in thousands, except per share amounts)					(in thousands, except per share amounts)

Net (loss)/income	$	(5,037	)	$	1	$	(10,826	)	$	(2,059	)


Weighted-average common shares - Basic		53,659			53,649		53,658			46,694
Add: Dilutive effect of stock compensation plans		—			685		—			—


Weighted-average common shares - Diluted		53,659			54,334		53,658			46,694


Net (loss)/income per common share:
Basic	$	(0.09	)	$	0.00	$	(0.20	)	$	(0.04	)


Diluted	$	(0.09	)	$	0.00	$	(0.20	)	$	(0.04	)

NOTE 8. INTANGIBLE ASSETS

Intangible assets are as follows:


	July 2, 2011			January 1, 2011			Original Useful Life (in years)
	(in thousands)
Intangible assets:
Trademarks	$	44,400		$	44,400		indefinite


Customer relationships		55,700			55,700		10
Less: Accumulated amortization		(41,348	)		(38,562	)


Subtotal		14,352			17,138


Hurricane intellectual assets		2,797			2,797		3
Less: Accumulated amortization		(509	)		(44	)


Subtotal		2,288			2,753


Intangible assets, net	$	61,040		$	64,291

Indefinite Lived Intangible Asset

The impairment evaluation of the carrying amount of intangible assets with indefinite lives is conducted annually, or more frequently, if events or changes in circumstances indicate that an asset might be impaired. The evaluation is performed by comparing the carrying amounts of these assets to their estimated fair values. If the estimated fair value is less than the carrying amount of the intangible assets, then an impairment charge is recorded to reduce the asset to its estimated fair value. The estimated fair value is determined using the relief from royalty method that is based upon the discounted projected cost savings (value) attributable to ownership of our trademarks, our only indefinite lived intangible assets.

In estimating fair value, the method we use requires us to make assumptions, the most material of which are net sales projections attributable to products sold with these trademarks, the anticipated royalty rate we would pay if the trademarks were not owned (as a percent of net sales), and a weighted average discount rate. These assumptions are subject to change based on changes in the markets in which these products are sold, which impact our projections of future net sales and the assumed royalty rate. Factors affecting the weighted average discount rate include assumed debt to equity ratios, risk-free interest rates and equity returns, each for market participants in our industry.

No impairment test was conducted as of July 2, 2011. Our year-end test of trademarks, performed as of January 1, 2011, utilized a weighted average royalty rate of 4.0% and a discount rate of 16.8%. Projected net sales used in the analysis were based on historical experience and a continuance of the recent decline in sales in the near future, followed by modest growth beginning in 2012. As of January 1, 2011, the estimated fair value of the trademarks exceeded book value by approximately 15%, or $6.6 million. We believe our projected sales are reasonable based on available information regarding our industry. We also believe the royalty rate is appropriate and could improve over time based on market trends and information, including that which is set forth above. The weighted average discount rate was based on current financial market trends and will remain dependent on such trends in the future. Absent offsetting changes in other factors, a 1% increase in the discount rate would decrease the estimated fair value of our trademarks by approximately $3.6 million but would not result in an impairment.

Amortizable Intangible Assets

We perform an impairment test on our amortizable intangible assets anytime that impairment indicators exist. Such assets include our customer relationships asset and the intellectual property assets acquired upon exercise of the option to purchase the Hurricane Window and Door Technology assets in December 2010. No such impairment and indicators were identified in 2011. We will continue to monitor and evaluate potential impairment indicators, including further declines in the housing market, which could result in impairment.

NOTE 9. LONG-TERM DEBT

On June 23, 2011, PGT Industries, Inc., entered into a credit agreement (the “Credit Agreement”) with three lenders. The Credit Agreement replaces the Company’s second amended and restated credit agreement, dated as of February 14, 2006 (the “Old Credit Agreement”). The Credit Agreement provides for a $15.0 million revolving credit facility, a $48.0 million term loan facility and an uncommitted incremental facility in an amount of up to $25.0 million. The revolving credit facility commitment and the term loans under the Credit Agreement will mature five years from the date of the execution of the Credit Agreement. As of July 2, 2011, there were $2.6 million of letters of credit outstanding and $12.4 million available on the revolver.

All borrowings under the Credit Agreement bear interest, at our option, at either: (a) a “base rate” equal to the highest of: (i) 0.50% per year above the weighted average of the rates on overnight federal funds transactions with members of the Federal Reserve System, (ii) the annual rate of interest in effect for that day as publicly announced as the “prime rate” and (iii) the one-month “eurodollar rate” (not to be less than 1.25%) or (b) a “eurodollar base rate” equal to the higher of (i) 1.25% and (ii) (adjusted for reserve requirements, deposit insurance assessment rates and other regulatory costs for eurodollar liabilities) the rate at which eurodollar deposits in dollars for the relevant interest period (which will be one, two, three or six months or, subject to availability, nine or twelve months, as selected by us) are offered in the interbank eurodollar market plus, in each case, a rate dependent on the ratio of our funded debt as compared to our adjusted consolidated EBITDA, ranging from 3.5% to 2.0% per year for borrowings bearing interest at the “base rate” and from 4.5% to 3.0% per year for borrowings bearing interest at the “eurodollar rate” (such rate added to the “eurodollar rate,” the “Eurodollar Margin”).

In accordance with Credit Agreement we will pay quarterly fees on the unused portion of the revolving credit facility at a rate equal to 0.50% as well as a quarterly letter of credit fee at a rate per annum equal to the Eurodollar Margin for revolving loans based on the maximum undrawn face amount of any outstanding letters of credit. We also pay customary transaction charges in connection with any letters of credit. In connection with this refinancing, we wrote off $0.4 million of deferred financing costs from our previous credit agreement, which is classified within other expense (income), net in the condensed consolidated statements of operations for the three and six months ended July 2, 2011.

Commencing in our third quarter, the $48.0 million term loan facility will be subject to quarterly repayments of 0.625% through our fiscal quarter ending on June 30, 2012, 1.25% through our fiscal quarter ending on July 4, 2015, and 1.875% thereafter, on a scheduled basis set forth in the Credit Agreement, with the final payment of all amounts outstanding (including accrued interest) being due five years from the date of the execution of the Credit Agreement.

The Credit Agreement imposes certain restrictions on us, including restrictions on our ability to: incur debt or provide guarantees; grant or suffer to exist liens; sell our assets; pay dividends or make other distributions in respect of capital stock; prepay certain indebtedness, make loans, advances, investments and acquisitions; change our line of business; engage in affiliate transactions; consummate mergers, consolidations or other fundamental transactions; and enter into agreements with negative pledge clauses. Commencing with the fiscal quarter ending on October 1, 2011, the Credit Agreement also requires us to maintain certain minimum interest coverage ratios and maximum leverage ratios, which are tested at the end of each fiscal quarter, and further provides for customary affirmative covenants (including obligations to hedge a portion of our interest rate risk) and events of default.

PGT, Inc. has unconditionally guaranteed all loans and other obligations under the Credit Agreement and related documents and such guarantee is secured by a lien on the assets of our wholly owned subsidiary, PGT Industries, Inc., subject to certain limitations. PGT, Inc. has no operations or assets independent of its subsidiary.

Contractual future maturities of long-term debt and capital leases as of July 2, 2011 are as follows (in thousands):


Remainder of 2011	$	0.7
2012		1.8
2013		2.4
2014		2.4
2015		3.0
2016		37.8


Total	$	48.1

The Old Credit Agreement consisted of $235 million senior secured credit facility (“Terminated Facility”) and a $115 million second lien term loan due February 14, 2012, with a syndicate of banks. The Terminated Facility was composed of a $25 million revolving credit facility, having been reduced from $30 million as a result of the third amendment discussed below, and initially, a $205 million first lien term loan. The second lien term loan was fully repaid with proceeds from our IPO in 2006. The outstanding balance of the first lien term loan on April 2, 2011 was $50.0 million. During 2010, we prepaid $18.0 million of long-term debt with cash generated from operations and from the net proceeds of the rights offering.

On December 24, 2009, we announced that we entered into a third amendment to the Terminated Facility. The amendment, among other things, provided a leverage covenant holiday for 2010, increased the maximum leverage amount for the first quarter of 2011 to 6.25 times (then dropping 0.25X per quarter starting the second quarter until the end of the term), extended the due date on the revolver loan until the end of 2011, increased the applicable rate on any outstanding revolver loan by 25 basis points, and set a base rate floor of 4.25%. The effectiveness of the amendment was conditioned, among other things, on the repayment of at least $17 million of the term loan under the Terminated Facility no later than March 31, 2010, of which no more than $2 million was permitted to come from cash on hand. In December 2009, the Company used cash generated from operations to prepay $2 million of outstanding borrowings under the Terminated Facility. Using proceeds from the 2010 rights offering, the Company made an additional prepayment of $15.0 million on March 17, 2010, bringing total prepayments of debt at that time to $17.0 million. Fees paid to the administrative agent and lenders totaled $1.0 million. Such fees were being amortized using the effective interest method over the remaining term of the Terminated Facility. Having made the total required prepayment and having satisfied all other conditions to bring the amendment into effect, the amendment became effective on March 17, 2010.

Under the third amendment, the first lien term loan bore interest at a rate equal to an adjusted LIBOR rate plus a margin ranging from 3.5% per annum to 5% per annum or a base rate plus a margin ranging from 2.5% per annum to 4.0% per annum, at our option. The margin in either case is dependent on our leverage ratio. The loans under the Terminated Facility bore interest at a rate equal to an adjusted LIBOR rate plus a margin depending on our leverage ratio ranging from 3.00% per annum to 5.00% per annum or a base rate plus a margin ranging from 2.00% per annum to 4.00% per annum, at our option. The amendment established a floor of 4.25% for base rate loans, and continued the 3.25% floor for adjusted LIBOR established in the previous amendment.

NOTE 10. COMPREHENSIVE LOSS AND ACCUMULATED OTHER COMPREHENSIVE LOSS

The following table shows the components of comprehensive loss for the three and six month periods ended July 2, 2011 and July 3, 2010:


	Three Months Ended						Six Months Ended
	July 2, 2011			July 3, 2010			July 2, 2011			July 3, 2010
	(in thousands)						(in thousands)
Net (loss)/income	$	(5,037	)	$	1		$	(10,826	)	$	(2,059	)

Other comprehensive loss, net of taxes:
Change related to forward contracts for aluminum, net of tax expense of $0 and $0 for the three month periods ended July 2, 2011 and July 3, 2010, respectively, and net of tax expense of $0 and $0 for the six month periods ended July 2, 2011 and July 3, 2010, respectively		(309	)		(702	)		(183	)		(715	)


Total comprehensive loss	$	(5,346	)	$	(701	)	$	(11,009	)	$	(2,774	)

The following table shows the components of accumulated other comprehensive loss for the three and six month periods ended July 2, 2011 and July 3, 2010:


(in thousands)	Aluminum Forward Contracts			Valuation Allowance			Total
Balance at April 2, 2011	$	(1,553	)	$	436		$	(1,117	)
Changes in fair value		(65	)		0			(65	)
Reclassification to earnings		(244	)		0			(244	)
Tax effect		121			(121	)		—

Balance at July 2, 2011	$	(1,741	)	$	315		$	(1,426	)


(in thousands)	Aluminum Forward Contracts			Valuation Allowance			Total
Balance at April 3, 2010	$	(1,509	)	$	465		$	(1,044	)
Changes in fair value		(572	)		0			(572	)
Reclassification to earnings		(130	)		0			(130	)
Tax effect		274			(274	)		—

Balance at July 3, 2010	$	(1,937	)	$	191		$	(1,746	)


(in thousands)	Aluminum Forward Contracts			Valuation Allowance			Total
Balance at January 1, 2011	$	(1,631	)	$	388		$	(1,243	)
Changes in fair value		194			0			194
Reclassification to earnings		(377	)		0			(377	)
Tax effect		73			(73	)		—

Balance at July 2, 2011	$	(1,741	)	$	315		$	(1,426	)


(in thousands)	Aluminum Forward Contracts			Valuation Allowance			Total
Balance at January 2, 2010	$	(1,501	)	$	470		$	(1,031	)
Changes in fair value		(504	)		—			(504	)
Reclassification to earnings		(211	)		—			(211	)
Tax effect		279			(279	)		—

Balance at July 3, 2010	$	(1,937	)	$	191		$	(1,746	)

NOTE 11. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

Litigation

Our Company is a party to various legal proceedings in the ordinary course of business. Although the ultimate disposition of those proceedings cannot be predicted with certainty, management believes the outcome of any claim that is pending or threatened, either individually or in the aggregate, will not have a materially adverse effect on our operations, financial position or cash flows.

NOTE 12. FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS AND DERIVATIVE FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

Financial Instruments

Our financial instruments, not including derivative financial instruments discussed below, include cash, accounts receivable and accounts payable whose carrying amounts approximate their fair values due to their short-term nature. Our financial instruments also include long-term debt. As the refinancing was completed on June 23, 2011, the fair value is approximately equal to the carrying value as of July 2, 2011. Based on bid prices for our debt, the fair value of our long-term debt was approximately $48 million as of January 1, 2011.

Derivative Financial Instruments

We enter into aluminum forward contracts to hedge the fluctuations in the purchase price of aluminum extrusion we use in production. Our contracts are designated as cash flow hedges since they are highly effective in offsetting changes in the cash flows attributable to forecasted purchases of aluminum.

Guidance under the Financial Instruments topic of the Codification requires us to record our hedge contracts at fair value and consider our credit risk for contracts in a liability position, and our counter-parties’ credit risk for contracts in an asset position, in determining fair value. We assess our counter-parties’ risk of non-performance when measuring the fair value of financial instruments in an asset position by evaluating their financial position, including cash on hand, as well as their credit ratings. We assess our risk of non-performance when measuring the fair value of our financial instruments in a liability position by evaluating our credit ratings, our current liquidity including cash on hand and availability under our revolving credit facility as compared to the maturities of the financial liabilities. In addition, we entered into an arrangement with our commodities broker that provides for, among other things, the close-out netting of exchange-traded transactions in the event of the insolvency of either party.

We do not maintain a line of credit to cover the liability position of open contracts for the purchase of aluminum in the event that the price of aluminum falls. Should the price of aluminum fall to a level which causes us to switch to a liability position for open aluminum contracts, we would be required to fund daily margin calls to cover the excess.

At July 2, 2011, the fair value of our aluminum forward contracts was in an asset position of $425 thousand including $304 thousand of cash on deposit with our commodity broker. We had 12 outstanding forward contracts for the purchase of 1.7 million pounds of aluminum, approximately 39% of our anticipated need for the third and fourth quarter of 2011, at an average price of $1.08 per pound with maturity dates of between less than one month and 5 months through December 2011. We assessed the risk of non-performance of the counter-party to these contracts and recorded an immaterial adjustment to fair value as of July 2, 2011. When margin calls are required, we net cash collateral from payments of margin calls on deposit with our commodities broker against the liability position of open contracts for the purchase of aluminum on a first-in, first-out basis. For statement of cash flows presentation, we present net cash receipts from and payments to the margin account as investing activities.

In addition, as of July 2, 2011, we had entered into six zero cost collars with a ceiling of $2,700 per metric ton and a concurrent floor at $2,295 per metric ton that hedge 0.9 million pounds, approximately 22% of our remaining 2011 third and fourth quarter anticipated needs. Should prices fall within the range upon settlement, there is no cost to the collars. If aluminum is above $2,700 per metric ton we would be able to purchase at $2,700 per ton. If aluminum is below $2,295 per metric ton we would be required to purchase at $2,295 per metric ton. As of July 2, 2011, aluminum is priced between our ceiling and floor and the net fair value of the instruments was insignificant.

The fair value of our aluminum hedges is classified in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets as follows (in thousands):


		July 2,		January 1,
		2011		2011

Derivatives in a net asset position	Balance Sheet Location
Hedging instruments:
Aluminum forward contracts	Other Current Assets	$	121	$	300
Cash on deposit related to payments of margin calls	Other Current Assets		304		250


Total hedging instruments		$	425	$	550

Aluminum forward contracts identical to those held by us trade on the London Metal Exchange (“LME”). The LME provides a transparent forum and is the world’s largest center for the trading of futures contracts for non-ferrous metals. The prices are used by the metals industry worldwide as the basis for contracts for the movement of physical material throughout the production cycle. Based on this high degree of volume and liquidity in the LME, the valuation price at any measurement date for contracts with identical terms as to prompt date, trade date and trade price as those we hold at any time we believe represents a contract’s exit price to be used for purposes of determining fair value. We categorize these aluminum forward contracts as being valued using Level 2 inputs as follows:


	Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date
	of Net Asset Using:
			Quoted		Significant		Significant
			Prices in		Other Observable		Unobservable
	July 2,		Active Markets		Inputs		Inputs
Description	2011		(Level 1)		(Level 2)		(Level 3)
	(in thousands)

Aluminum forward contracts	$	121	$	0	$	121	$	0

Cash on deposit related to payments of margin calls		304

Aluminum forward contracts, net asset	$	425


Description	January 1, 2011		Quoted Prices in Active Markets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
	(in thousands)

Aluminum forward contracts	$	300	$	—	$	300	$	—

Cash on deposit related to payments of margin calls		250

Aluminum forward contracts, net asset	$	550

Our aluminum hedges qualify as highly effective for reporting purposes. For the three and six month periods ended July 2, 2011, and July 3, 2010, the ineffective portion of the hedging instruments was not significant. Effectiveness of aluminum forward contracts is determined by comparing the change in the fair value of the forward contract to the change in the expected cash to be paid for the hedged item. At July 2, 2011, these contracts were designated as effective. The effective portion of the gain or loss on our aluminum forward contracts is reported as a component of other comprehensive income and is reclassified into earnings in the same line item in the income statement as the hedged item in the same period or periods during which the transaction affects earnings. For the three and six month periods ended July 2, 2011, and July 3, 2010, no amounts were reclassified to earnings because of the discontinuance of a cash flow hedge because it was probable that the original forecasted transaction would not occur. The ending accumulated balance related to the fair value of the aluminum forward contracts included in accumulated other comprehensive income, net of tax, is $0.1 million as of July 2, 2011, all of which is expected to be reclassified into earnings over the next twelve months.

The following represents the gains (losses) on derivative financial instruments for the three and six month periods ended July 2, 2011 and July 3, 2010, and their classifications within the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements (in thousands):

Derivatives in Cash Flow Hedging Relationships

Amount of Gain or (Loss)
Recognized in OCI on
Derivatives (Effective Portion)

Location of Gain or (Loss)
Reclassified from
Accumulated OCI into
Income (Effective
Portion)

Amount of Gain or (Loss)
Reclassified from Accumulated
OCI into Income (Effective
Portion)

Three Months Ended

July 2,

July 3,

July 2,

July 3,

2011

2010

2011

2010

Aluminum contracts

(65

)

(572

)

Cost of sales

285

130

Derivatives in Cash Flow Hedging Relationships

Location of Gain or (Loss)
Recognized in Income on
Derivatives (Ineffective
Portion)

Amount of Gain or (Loss)
Recognized in Income on
Derivatives (Ineffective
Portion)

Three Months Ended

July 2,
2011

July 3,
2010

Aluminum contracts

Other income or other
expense

(41

)

Derivatives in Cash Flow Hedging Relationships

Amount of Gain or (Loss)
Recognized in OCI on
Derivatives (Effective Portion)

Location of Gain or (Loss)
Reclassified from
Accumulated OCI into
Income (Effective
Portion)

Amount of Gain or (Loss)
Reclassified from Accumulated
OCI into Income (Effective
Portion)

Six Months Ended

July 2,
2011

July 3,
2010

July 2,
2011

July 3,
2010

Aluminum contracts

194

(504

)

Cost of sales

377

191

Derivatives in Cash Flow Hedging Relationships

Location of Gain or (Loss)
Recognized in Income on
Derivatives (Ineffective
Portion)

Amount of Gain or (Loss)
Recognized in Income on
Derivatives (Ineffective
Portion)

Six Months Ended

July 2,
2011

July 3,
2010

Aluminum contracts

Other income or other
expense

NOTE 13. ASSETS HELD FOR SALE

In the first quarter of 2010, we entered into an agreement to list the Lexington, North Carolina facility for sale with an agent. We determined the fair value by obtaining recommendations of value from various local real estate agents and by reviewing data from comparable sales and leases executed in the recent past.

As of January 1, 2011, we reviewed the relevant factors affecting the value of this facility and determined that the value remained appropriate. This facility’s fair value was determined using Level 2 inputs as follows:


	Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date of Asset Using:
Description	January 1, 2011		Quoted Prices in Active Markets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
	(in thousands)

Lexington Property	$	657	$	—	$	657	$	—

In January 2011, we accepted an offer to sell the property. The purchase price less estimated closing cost resulted in an additional impairment of less than $0.1 million, which was recorded in the fourth quarter of 2010. The sale of this building closed in the second quarter of 2011 at approximately the net book value as recorded.

NOTE 14. GOVERNMENT INCENTIVE

In February 2011 we received a government incentive of $0.6 million in cash from our local county authority to assist in the consolidation of operations into our Florida facilities. Under the terms of the agreement we must, among other things, move the majority of our equipment from North Carolina to Florida and lease at least one building in Sarasota County, both of which were accomplished by April 2, 2011. In addition, we must add 400 employees by December 1, 2015. If we have not hired or do not have open positions for 400 additional employees on December 1, 2015, we will be required to repay $1,500 for each employee under 400 that we have not hired or have an open position for at that date. The agreement also requires us to repay a pro-rata portion of the grant if we relocate operations outside of the county before December 1, 2015.

We believe that based on the number of employees hired to date and our plans for future hiring, as well as the completion of other terms noted above, we have reasonable assurance that a substantial majority of the grant will be retained on December 1, 2015. Due to the existence of the performance obligations extending over a 5-year period, we will recognize the reasonably assured portion of the grant over the life of the agreement as an offset to the payroll of the employees hired, which is included in cost of goods sold. This amount is expected to result in an immaterial amount recognized each quarter through December 1, 2015. As of July 2, 2011, the deferred portion of the grant of $0.6 million has been classified as $0.1 million in accounts payable and accrued liabilities and $0.5 million in other liabilities within the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet.

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The following discussion of our financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with the Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto for the year ended January 1, 2011 included in our most recent annual report on Form 10-K.

Special Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements

This document includes forward-looking statements regarding, among other things, our financial condition and business strategy. Forward-looking statements provide our current expectations and projections about future events. Forward-looking statements include statements about our expectations, beliefs, plans, objectives, intentions, assumptions, and other statements that are not historical facts. As a result, all statements other than statements of historical facts included in this discussion and analysis and located elsewhere in this document regarding the prospects of our industry and our prospects, plans, financial position, and business strategy may constitute forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 21E of the Exchange Act. In addition, forward-looking statements generally can be identified by the use of forward-looking terminology such as “may,” “could,” “expect,” “intend,” “estimate,” “anticipate,” “plan,” “foresee,” “believe,” or “continue,” or the negatives of these terms or variations of them or similar terminology, but the absence of these words does not necessarily mean that a statement is not forward-looking.

Forward-looking statements are subject to known and unknown risks and uncertainties and are based on potentially inaccurate assumptions that could cause actual results to differ materially from those expected or implied by the forward-looking statements. Although we believe that the expectations reflected in these forward-looking statements are reasonable, we can give no assurance that these expectations will occur as predicted. All subsequent written and oral forward-looking statements attributable to us or persons acting on our behalf are expressly qualified in their entirety by the cautionary statements included in this document. These forward-looking statements speak only as of the date of this report. We undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statement to reflect circumstances or events after the date of this report or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events, except as may be required by applicable securities laws.

Risks associated with our business, an investment in our securities, and with achieving the forward-looking statements contained in this report or in our news releases, Web sites, public filings, investor and analyst conferences or elsewhere, include, but are not limited to, the risk factors described in our most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Any of the risk factors described therein could cause our actual results to differ materially from expectations and could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations. We may not succeed in addressing these challenges and risks.

EXECUTIVE OVERVIEW

Sales and Operations

On August 3, we issued a press release and held a conference call on August 4, 2011 to review the results of operations for our second quarter and first six months ended July 2, 2011. During the call, we also discussed current market conditions and progress made regarding certain business initiatives and our plant consolidation. The overview and estimates contained in this report are consistent with those given in our press release and our conference call remarks. We are neither updating nor confirming that information.

In the second quarter of 2011, housing starts in our core market were down 5%. Multi-family starts were up 9%, but single family starts decreased 8%, each compared to a year ago. Market conditions remain difficult and are not expected to turn around significantly in 2011.

Sales in the second quarter decreased $3.8 million or 7.8% from a year ago. This includes a reduction in WinGuard sales which were down $1.8 million or 5.9%, mainly as a result of temporary capacity constraints. In April 2011, our Vinyl WinGuard lines were able to produce approximately 50% of the units that were produced in April 2010. This was due to the shutdown in North Carolina, the line move to Florida and the subsequent ramp up of the line. As a result, these lines could not meet demand, and Vinyl WinGuard sales were down $400 thousand or 8% from prior year. That product line had year over year sales growth in each of the previous 4 quarters.

We did experience improvement on these lines during the second quarter. In June, that line produced 90% of the units produced in June 2010.

Although our Aluminum WinGuard lines were already located in Florida, production was negatively affected by the increased pressure on our glass operations. In order to meet demand we extended our lead times during April. This increase in lead time, along with the shift towards vinyl products, contributed to the decline in Aluminum WinGuard sales, which were down $1.4 million, or 6%, for the quarter. Lead times for product on this line returned to 10 days at the end of July.

Our vinyl non-impact products, including SpectraGuard, reported a $1.6 million decline in sales, or 33%, due both to our decreased sales efforts out of state as well as capacity constraints caused by moving these lines during the second quarter.

We also experienced a $1.6 million decrease in Architectural Systems sales due to ongoing softness in the commercial market.

Our PremierVue line of high end vinyl impact products continues to grow with a $1.1 million increase in sales to $2.2 million for the second quarter. The growth of this line shows that consumers in Florida are interested in energy efficient products meeting the highest structural demands.

In terms of sales by region, out of state sales were down $3.0 million, or 39%. This decline was not unexpected, as we have intentionally decreased our sales efforts out of state, and narrowed our focus to Florida, international, and coastal markets.

Sales into Florida were down $1.1 million, or 2.8%, from a year ago due mainly to temporary capacity constraints described above.

International sales have increased 17%, or $0.3 million, over prior year. Our recently added resources are already making an impact in a territory in which we believe there is a strong demand for our impact products.

Our decline in overall sales occurred both in new construction, down 11%, and in repair and remodeling (R&R), down 5%. As a percentage of total sales for the second quarter of 2011, R&R sales accounted for 78% and new construction sales accounted for 22% of sales.

Liquidity and Cash Flow

On June 23, 2011 we refinanced our long-term debt which was going to be due in February 2012. This agreement, which was filed as part of an 8-K with the SEC on June 23, 2011, among other things, extends the due date of our debt to June 2016 and reduces the interest rate on the debt by 100 basis points (5.75 percent initially with the potential for a further improvement as our leverage decreases). In connection with this refinancing, we paid down our outstanding debt by $2 million to $48 million.

Consolidation and Restructuring

On December 3, 2010, we announced that our Salisbury, North Carolina operations would be transferred to Venice, Florida to consolidate our window and door production at our Florida plant. All operations have been moved as of the end of the second quarter. As a result of this consolidation, we recorded consolidation charges of $1.4 million, which include $0.1 million of severance expense and $1.3 million of moving expenses. The classification of these charges were $1.2 million within costs of goods sold and the remaining $0.2 million within selling, general and administrative expenses in the accompanying condensed consolidated statement of operations for the three months ended July 2, 2011. We recorded consolidation charges of $4.0 million, which includes $1.3 million of severance expense and $2.7 million of moving expenses. The classification of these charges were $3.3 million within costs of goods sold and the remaining $0.7 million within selling, general and administrative expenses in the accompanying condensed consolidated statement of operations for the six months ended July 2, 2011. The charges relate primarily to employee separation costs and moving expenses. The total charges recorded through July 2, 2011 for the consolidation are $6.1 million, $2.1 million having been recorded in December 2009, of which $0.1 million and $1.8 million are unpaid as of July 2, 2011 and January 1, 2011, respectively, and are classified in accounts payable and accrued liabilities within the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets. The unpaid severance expense as of July 2, 2011 are expected to be disbursed prior to the end of 2011. The Company anticipates incurring an additional $0.5 million of expense during the third and fourth quarter of 2011, to complete the consolidation of the operations.

The following table provides information with respect to our accrual for severance costs incurred in connection with the consolidation and restructuring costs:


	Beginning of Period		Charged to Expense		Disbursed in Cash			End of Period
(in thousands)

Three months ended July 2, 2011:
2010 Consolidation	$	1,359	$	114	$	(1,345	)	$	128

Three months ended July 3, 2010:
2009 Restructurings	$	238	$	—	$	(128	)	$	110

Six months ended July 2, 2011:
2010 Consolidation	$	1,812	$	1,294	$	(2,978	)	$	128

Six months ended July 3, 2010:
2009 Restructurings	$	898	$	—	$	(788	)	$	110

Selected Financial Data

The following table presents financial data derived from our unaudited statements of operations as a percentage of total revenues for the periods indicated.


	Three Months Ended						Six Months Ended
	July 2,			July 3,			July 2,			July 3,
	2011			2010			2011			2010

Net sales		100.0	%		100.0	%		100.0	%		100.0	%
Cost of sales		79.9	%		68.9	%		79.7	%		70.3	%

Gross margin		20.1	%		31.1	%		20.3	%		29.7	%
Selling, general and administrative expenses		27.9	%		28.4	%		29.9	%		28.9	%

(Loss) income from operations		(7.8	%)		2.7	%		(9.6	%)		0.8	%
Interest expense, net		2.4	%		2.5	%		2.5	%		3.0	%
Other expense		1.0	%		0.0	%		0.5	%		0.0	%

(Loss) income before income taxes		(11.2	%)		0.2	%		(12.6	%)		(2.2	%)
Income tax expense		0.0	%		0.2	%		0.0	%		0.1	%

Net (loss) income		(11.2	%)		0.0	%		(12.6	%)		(2.3	%)

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED JULY 2, 2011 AND JULY 3, 2010

Net sales

Net sales were $45.2 million in the second quarter of 2011, which represented a decrease of $3.8 million, or 7.8%, compared to the 2010 second quarter. The following table shows net sales classified by major product category (sales in millions):


	Three Months Ended
	July 2, 2011					July 3, 2010
	Sales		% of sales			Sales		% of sales			% change
Product category:
Impact Window and Door Products	$	32.3		71.5	%	$	34.5		70.4	%		(6.4	%)
Other Window and Door Products		12.9		28.5	%		14.5		29.6	%		(11.0	%)


Total net sales	$	45.2		100.0	%	$	49.0		100.0	%		(7.8	%)

Net sales of impact window and door products, which includes our WinGuard, PremierVue and Architectural Systems product lines, were $32.3 million for the second quarter of 2011, a decrease of $2.2 million, or 6.4%, from $34.5 million in net sales for the 2010 second quarter. The decrease was due mainly to a decrease of $1.6 million in our Architectural Systems products sales due to the softness of the commercial market, and a decrease of $1.8 million in WinGuard product sales. Aluminum WinGuard sales were down $1.4 million due in part to a switch from aluminum to vinyl products in some of our Florida markets, as well as temporary capacity constraints as a result of our consolidation. Vinyl WinGuard sales were also down $0.4 million despite the switch to vinyl products, as a result of the temporary capacity constraints caused by our plant consolidation completed in the second quarter. These constraints required us to temporarily increase lead times on several lines including WinGuard. This was offset by an increase in PremierVue sales of $1.1 million when compared to prior year. PremierVue sales are continuing to gain traction in markets where impact resistance and energy efficiency are both important to the consumer. All of our impact product sales have also been affected, to some extent, by the lack of storm activity during the four most recent hurricane seasons in the coastal markets of Florida served by the Company. WinGuard product sales represented 63% and 62% of our net sales for the second quarter of 2011 and 2010, respectively.

Net sales of Other Window and Door Products were $12.9 million for the second quarter of 2011, a decrease of $1.6 million, or 11.0%, from $14.5 million in net sales for the 2010 second quarter. This decrease was due mainly to a decrease in sales of our non-impact vinyl products whose sales were down $1.6 million, as a result of our decision to concentrate our sales efforts on Florida, international, and coastal markets, as well as temporary capacity constraints as a result of the consolidation.

Gross margin

Gross margin was $9.1 million, or 20.1% of sales, for the second quarter of 2011, a decrease of $6.2 million, or 40.5%, from $15.2 million, or 31.1% of sales, for the second quarter of 2010. The 2011 second quarter margin was impacted by $1.2 million in consolidation costs and $3.4 million related to the temporary excess labor and scrap expense incurred as a result of the consolidation. This temporary excess labor and scrap was calculated by comparing actual quarter results to a normalized pre-consolidation quarter. We expect to return to normal operating efficiencies, by the end of the third quarter. Adjusting for these charges, gross margin would have been 30.1% in the second quarter of 2011. The 1.0% decrease in adjusted gross margin as a percent of sales is mainly a result of lower absorption consistent with lower volume (2.3%) and an increase in the cost of materials (1.8%). This was partially offset by the effect of the price increase announced in the first quarter (2.1%), slightly improved mix (0.2%), and lower overhead spending (0.8%).

Selling, general and administrative expenses

Selling, general and administrative expenses were $12.6 million for the second quarter of 2011, a decrease of $1.3 million from $13.9 million for the 2010 second quarter. Selling, general, and administrative expense includes charges of $0.2 million in 2011 related to our plant consolidation. Excluding the consolidation charges in 2011, selling, general and administrative expenses decreased $1.5 million and as a percentage of sales was 27.4% in the second quarter of 2011 compared to 28.4% in the second quarter of 2010. The decrease in adjusted SG&A was due mainly to a decrease in selling and marketing expenses, a $0.4 million decrease in non-cash stock compensation and depreciation expense of $0.2 million.

Interest expense, net

Interest expense, net was $1.1 million in the second quarter of 2011, a decrease of $0.2 million from $1.3 million for the second quarter of 2010. The decrease was due to lower debt levels outstanding during the second quarter and the effect of the lower interest rate for the last part of the quarter.

Other expense ( income), net

Other expense (income), net was $0.5 million in the second quarter of 2011. The increase was due to a $0.4 million write-off of deferred financing costs in connection with our refinancing that closed in the second quarter of 2011, and less than $0.1 million relating to the ineffective portions of aluminum hedges.

Income tax benefit

We had an effective tax rate of 0.0% in the second quarter of 2011 due to the full valuation allowances that we apply to our deferred tax assets. We recorded $77 thousand in tax expense during the second quarter of 2010 to true up the provision recorded at the end of 2009 year to the tax return as filed. Absent that entry, we had an effective tax rate of 0.0% in the second quarter of 2010. Changes in deferred tax assets and liabilities during the second quarter of 2011 and 2010 were offset by changes in the valuation allowance for deferred tax assets.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JULY 2, 2011 AND JULY 3, 2010

Net sales

Net sales were $85.8 million in the first six months of 2011, which represented a decrease of $3.7 million, or 4.1%, compared to the 2010 first six months. The following table shows net sales classified by major product category (sales in millions):


	Six Months Ended
	July 2, 2011					July 3, 2010
	Sales		% of sales			Sales		% of sales			% change
Product category:
Impact Window and Door Products	$	60.7		70.7	%	$	62.3		69.6	%		(2.6	%)
Other Window and Door Products		25.1		29.3	%		27.2		30.4	%		(7.7	%)


Total net sales	$	85.8		100.0	%	$	89.5		100.0	%		(4.1	%)

Net sales of impact window and door products, which includes our WinGuard, PremierVue and Architectural Systems product lines, were $60.7 million for the first six months of 2011, a decrease of $1.6 million, or 2.6%, from $62.3 million in net sales for the 2010 first six months. The decrease was due mainly to a decrease of $2.1 million in our Architectural Systems products sales due to the softness of the commercial market and a decrease of $1.0 million in WinGuard product sales. Aluminum WinGuard sales were down $1.4 million, or 3.1% due in part to a switch from aluminum to vinyl products in some of our Florida markets, as well as temporary capacity constraints as a result of our consolidation. Vinyl WinGuard sales were up $0.5 million, or 5.5%, however these sales were negatively impacted by the temporary capacity constraints, that arose in the second quarter as a result of the consolidation. These constraints required us to temporarily increase lead times on several lines including WinGuard. These decreases were offset by an increase in PremierVue sales of $1.6 million, or 87%, when compared to prior year. PremierVue sales are continuing to gain traction in markets where impact resistance and energy efficiency are both important to the consumer. All of our impact product sales have also been affected, to some extent, by the lack of storm activity during the four most recent hurricane seasons in the coastal markets of Florida served by the Company. WinGuard product sales represented 63% and 62% our net sales for the first six months of 2011 and 2010, respectively.

Net sales of Other Window and Door Products were $25.1 million for the first six months of 2011, a decrease of $2.1 million, or 7.7%, from $27.2 million in net sales for the first six months of 2010. This decrease was due mainly to a decrease in sales of our non-impact vinyl products whose sales were down $1.8 million, or 19.4%, as a result of our decision to concentrate our sales efforts on Florida, international and coastal markets, as well as temporary capacity constraints as a result of the consolidation.

Gross margin

Gross margin was $17.4 million, or 20.3% of sales, for the first six months of 2011, a decrease of $9.2 million, or 34.5%, from $26.6 million, or 29.7% of sales, for the first six months of 2010. The 2011 first six months margin was impacted by $3.3 million in consolidation costs and $3.4 million related to the temporary excess labor and scrap expense incurred as a result of the consolidation. This temporary excess labor and scrap was calculated by comparing actual quarter results to a normalized pre-consolidation quarter. We expect to return to normal operating efficiencies, by the end of the third quarter. Adjusting for these charges, gross margin would have been 28.0% in the first six months of 2011. The 1.7% decrease in adjusted gross margin as a percent of sales is mainly a result of lower absorption consistent with lower volume (1.2%) and an increase in the cost of materials (1.7%). This was partially offset by the effect of the price increase implemented in the first quarter (1.1%).

Selling, general and administrative expenses

Selling, general and administrative expenses were $25.6 million for the first six months of 2011, a decrease of $0.2 million, from $25.8 million for the first six months of 2010. Selling, general, and administrative express includes charges of $0.7 million in 2011 related to our plant consolidation. Excluding the consolidation charges in 2011, selling, general and administrative expenses decreased $0.9 million and as a percentage of sales was 29.0% in the first six months of 2011 compared to 28.9% in the first six months of 2010. The decrease in adjusted SG&A was due mainly to a decrease in depreciation expense of $0.5 million and lower selling and marketing expenses.

Interest expense, net

Interest expense, net was $2.2 million in the first six months of 2011, a decrease of $0.5 million from $2.7 million for the first six months of 2010. The decrease is the result of lower overall debt levels during the first six months of 2011, as a result of the prepayment made during 2010.

Other expense (income), net

Other expense (income), net was $0.4 million for the first six months of 2011, which included a write-off of deferred financing costs in connection with our refinancing that closed in the second quarter of 2011.

Income tax benefit

We had an effective tax rate of 0.0% in the first six months of 2011 due to the full valuation allowances that we apply to our deferred tax assets. We recorded $77 thousand in tax expense during the first six months of 2010 to true up the provision recorded at the end of 2009 to the tax return as filed. Absent that entry, we have an effective tax rate of 0.0% in the first six months of 2010. Changes in deferred tax assets and liabilities during the first six months of 2011 and 2010 were offset by changes in the valuation allowance for deferred tax assets.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Our principal source of liquidity is cash flow generated by operations, supplemented by borrowings under our credit facilities. This cash generating capability provides us with financial flexibility in meeting operating and investing needs. Our primary capital requirements are to fund working capital needs, meet required debt payments, including debt service payments on our credit facilities, and fund capital expenditures.

2010 Rights Offering

The rights offering was 90.0% subscribed resulting in the Company distributing 18,336,368 shares of its common stock, including 15,210,184 shares under the basic subscription privilege and 3,126,184 under the over-subscription privilege. There were requests for 3,126,184 shares under the over-subscription privilege representing an allocation rate of 100% to each over-subscriber. Of the 18,336,368 shares issued, 13,333,332 shares were issued to JLL Partners Fund IV (“JLL”) the Company’s majority shareholder, including 10,719,389 shares issued under the basic subscription privilege and 2,613,943 shares issued under the over-subscription privilege. Prior to the rights offering, JLL held 18,758,934 shares, or 52.6%, of the Company’s outstanding common stock. With the completion of the rights offering, JLL holds 59.4% of our outstanding common stock.

Consolidated Cash Flows

Operating activities. Cash used in operating activities was $8.7 million in the first half of 2011 compared to cash provided of $4.7 million in the first half of 2010. This is due to our use of cash related to working capital primarily for the payment of $2.8 million in employee bonuses earned in 2010 and an increase in receivables of $4.9 million. In addition, we paid $9.1 million in consolidation expenses and temporary excess labor and scrap incurred as a result of the consolidation in the first half of 2011.

Direct cash flows from operations for the first half of 2011 and 2010 are as follows:


	Direct Cash Flows
	Six Months Ended
(in millions)	July 2, 2011			July 3, 2010
Collections from customers	$	82.2		$	86.3
Other collections of cash		1.9			1.2
Disbursements to vendors		(54.0	)		(53.9	)
Personnel related disbursements		(37.0	)		(30.3	)
Debt service costs		(1.8	)		(2.3	)
Other cash activity, net		(-0-	)		3.7


Cash used in operations	$	(8.7	)	$	4.7

Other collections of cash for in the first half of 2011 includes $0.6 million from the Sarasota County Economic Development grant. The remaining amount for the first half of 2011 and 2010 primarily represent scrap aluminum sales.

Days sales outstanding (DSO), which we calculate as accounts receivable divided by average daily sales, was 41 days at July 2, 2011, and 42 days at January 1, 2011, compared to 40 days at July 3, 2010, and 41 days at January 2, 2010, respectively. The gross amount of receivables from two customers on payment plans, at July 2, 2011, was $1.0 million, of which $0.8 million was reserved. During the quarter ended July 2, 2011, we received payments pursuant to these payment plans of less than $0.1 million.

Inventory on hand as of July 2, 2011, increased $1.5 million compared to July 3, 2010. Inventory turns during the first six months of 2011, increased to 11.5 from 11.2 when compared to the first six months of 2010.

We monitor and evaluate raw material inventory levels based on the need for each discrete item to fulfill short-term requirements calculated from current order patterns and to provide appropriate safety stock. Because all of our products are made-to-order, we have only a small amount of finished goods and work in process inventory. Because of these factors, our inventories are not excessive, and we believe the value of such inventories will be realized through sale.

Investing activities. Cash used for investing activities was $1.2 million for the first half of 2011, compared to cash used of $1.4 million for the first half of 2010. The decrease of $0.2 million in cash used in investing activities was due to proceeds from the sale of the Lexington facility offset by higher levels of capital spending.

Financing activities. Cash used in financing activities was $4.4 million in the first half of 2011, compared to cash provided by financing activities of $11.3 million in the first half of 2010. The cash provided by financing activities in the first half of 2010, include the $27.3 million in net proceeds from the rights offering, offset by the $15.0 million term debt prepayment made on March 17, 2010, and the $0.9 million in debt amendment fees.

Debt Covenants

In accordance with the Credit Agreement, defined below, we are required to maintain certain financial covenants the most restrictive of which is a maximum ratio of Total Long-Term Debt to Adjusted EBITDA for the trailing four quarters. Beginning with the quarter ended October 1, 2011, the maximum ratio allowed is 3.9 times, and is lowered every subsequent quarter. Adjusted EBITDA as defined in the agreement; Net Income/(Loss) plus interest expense (net of interest income), income taxes, depreciation, amortization, as well as other non-reoccurring items such as restructuring charges, plant consolidation costs, manufacturing inefficiencies incurred in connection with the plant consolidation, and non-cash stock compensation. We closely monitor compliance with our various debt covenants.

Capital Resources

On June 23, 2011, PGT Industries, Inc. entered into a credit agreement (the “Credit Agreement”) with three lenders. The Credit Agreement replaces the Company’s second amended and restated credit agreement, dated as of February 14, 2006 (the “Old Credit Agreement”). The Credit Agreement provides for a $15.0 million revolving credit facility, a $48.0 million term loan facility and an uncommitted incremental facility in an amount of up to $25.0 million. The revolving credit facility commitment and the term loans under the Credit Agreement will mature five years from the date of the execution of the Credit Agreement. As of July 2, 2011, there were $2.6 million of letters of credit outstanding and $12.4 million available on the revolver.

In accordance with this Credit Agreement we will pay quarterly fees on the unused portion of the revolving credit agreement at a rate equal to 0.50% as well as a quarterly letter of credit fee at a rate per annum equal to the Eurodollar Margin for revolving loans based on the maximum undrawn face amount of any outstanding letters of credit. We also pay customary transaction charges in connection with any letters of credit. In connection with this refinancing, we wrote-off $0.4 million of deferred financing costs from our previous credit agreements, which is classified within other expense (income), net in the condensed consolidated statement of operations for the three and six months ended July 2, 2011.

scheduled basis set forth in the Credit Agreement, with the final payment of all amounts outstanding (including accrued interest) being due five years from the date of the execution of the Credit Agreement.

PGT Inc. has guaranteed all loans and other obligations under the Credit Agreement and related documents and such guarantee is secured by a lien on the assets of the our wholly owned subsidiary PGT Industries, Inc., subject to certain limitations PGT Inc. has no operations or assets independent of its subsidiary.

Capital Expenditures. Capital expenditures vary depending on prevailing business factors, including current and anticipated market conditions. For the first six months of 2011, capital expenditures were $1.7 million, compared to $1.0 million for the first six months of 2010. During the past several years and continuing into 2011, we reduced certain discretionary capital spending to conserve cash. We expect to spend nearly $5.3 million on capital expenditures in 2011, including capital expenditures related to product line expansions targeted at increasing sales. We anticipate that cash flows from operations and liquidity from the revolving credit facility, if needed, will be sufficient to execute our business plans.

Hedging. We enter into aluminum forward contracts to hedge the fluctuations in the purchase price of aluminum extrusion we use in production. The Company enters into these contracts by trading on the London Metal Exchange (“LME”). The Company trades on the LME using an international commodities broker that offers global access to all major markets. The Company does not currently maintain a line of credit with its commodities broker to cover the liability position of open contracts for the purchase of aluminum in the event that the price of aluminum falls. Should the price of aluminum fall to a level which causes the Company to have a net liability position for open aluminum contracts, the Company is required to fund daily margin calls to cover the excess.

Contractual Obligations

Other than the debt refinancing as described in “Liquidity and Capital Resources” above, there have been no significant changes to our “Disclosures of Contractual Obligations and Commercial Commitments” table in Part II, Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended January 1, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 21, 2011.

Significant Accounting Policies and Critical Accounting Estimates

Our consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Significant accounting policies are those that are both important to the accurate portrayal of a Company’s financial condition and results and require subjective or complex judgments, often as a result of the need to make estimates about the effect of matters that are inherently uncertain. We make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in our financial statements and accompanying notes. Certain estimates are particularly sensitive due to their significance to the financial statements and the possibility that future events may be significantly different from our expectations.

We identified our significant accounting policies in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended January 1, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 21, 2011. There have been no changes to our critical accounting policies during the first six months of 2011.

ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

We experience changes in interest expense when market interest rates change. We are exposed to changes in LIBOR or the base rate. We do not currently use interest rate swaps, caps or futures contracts to mitigate this risk, although we will enter into such an agreement in the third quarter of 2011, for at least 50% of our outstanding debt in accordance with requirements related to the Credit Agreement. Changes in our debt could also increase these risks. Based on debt outstanding at July 2, 2011, a 1% increase (decrease) in interest rates above our interest rate floor established in the Credit Agreement, would result in approximately $0.5 million of additional (reduced) interest expense annually.

We utilize derivative financial instruments to hedge price movements in aluminum materials used in our manufacturing process. We entered into aluminum hedging instruments that settle at various times through the end of 2011 and cover approximately 39% of our anticipated needs for the third and fourth quarter of 2011 at an average price of $1.08 per pound. For forward contracts for the purchase of aluminum at July 2, 2011, a 10% decrease in the price of aluminum per pound would decrease the fair value of our forward contacts of aluminum by $0.2 million. This calculation utilizes our actual commitment of 1.7 million pounds under contract (to be settled throughout 2011) and the market price of aluminum as of July 2, 2011, which was approximately $1.12 per pound.

In addition, as of July 2, 2011, we had entered into zero cost collars with a ceiling of $2,700 per metric ton and a concurrent floor at $2,295 per metric ton that hedge 0.9 million pounds approximately 22% of our remaining 2011 third and fourth quarter anticipated needs. Should prices fall within the range upon settlement, there is no cost to the collars. If aluminum is above $2,700 per metric ton we would be able to purchase at $2,700 per ton. If aluminum is below $2,295 per metric ton, we would be required to purchase at $2,295 per metric ton. As of July 2, 2011, aluminum is priced between our ceiling and floor and a 10% decrease in the price of aluminum would have a minimal effect, if any at all, on the net fair value of our collars as the price of aluminum would fall right around the floor of $2,295 per metric ton.

ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures. Disclosure controls and procedures are controls and other procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the Company’s reports filed or submitted under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms.

A control system, however, no matter how well conceived and operated, can at best provide reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. Additionally, a control system reflects the fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to costs. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of error or fraud, if any, within our Company have been detected, and due to these inherent limitations, misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and not be detected.

Our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, with the assistance of management, evaluated the design, operation and effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act) as of the end of the period covered by this report (the “Evaluation Date”). Based on that evaluation, our chief executive officer and chief financial officer concluded that, as of the Evaluation Date, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective for the purposes of ensuring that information required to be disclosed in our reports filed under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to management, including our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting. During the period covered by this report, there have been no changes in our internal control over financial reporting identified in connection with the evaluation described above that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

PART II — OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

We are involved in various claims and lawsuits incidental to the conduct of our business in the ordinary course. We carry insurance coverage in such amounts in excess of our self-insured retention as we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances and that may or may not cover any or all of our liabilities with respect to claims and lawsuits. We do not believe that the ultimate resolution of these matters will have a material adverse impact on our financial position or results of operations.

Although our business and facilities are subject to federal, state and local environmental regulation, environmental regulation does not have a material impact on our operations. We believe that our facilities are in material compliance with such laws and regulations. As owners and lessees of real property, we can be held liable for the investigation or remediation of contamination on such properties, in some circumstances without regard to whether we knew of or were responsible for such contamination. Our current expenditures with respect to environmental investigation and remediation at our facilities are minimal, although no assurance can be provided that more significant remediation may not be required in the future as a result of spills or releases of petroleum products or hazardous substances or the discovery of previously unknown environmental conditions.

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS

In addition to the other information set forth in this report, you should carefully consider the factors discussed in Part 1, “Item 1A. Risk Factors” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended January 1, 2011, which could materially affect our business, financial condition or future results. The risks described in our Annual Report on Form 10-K are not the only risks facing our Company. Additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to us or that we currently deem to be immaterial also may materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and/or operating results.

ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS

Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities

None.

Use of Proceeds

Not applicable.

ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES

None.

ITEM 4. REMOVED AND RESERVED

ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION

None.

ITEM 6. EXHIBITS

The following items are attached or incorporated herein by reference:


3.1		Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of PGT, Inc. (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 18, 2010, Registration No. 000-52059)

3.2		Amended and Restated By-Laws of PGT, Inc. (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 18, 2010, Registration No. 000-52059)

4.1		Form of Specimen Certificate (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Amendment No. 2 to the Registration Statement of the Company on Form S-1, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 26, 2006, Registration No. 333-132365)


4.2		Amended and Restated Security Holders’ Agreement, by and among PGT, Inc., JLL Partners Fund IV, L.P., and the stockholders named therein, dated as of June 27, 2006 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 11, 2006, Registration No. 000-52059)

4.3		PGT Savings Plan (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.5 to the Company’s Form S-8 Registration Statement, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on October 15, 2007, Registration No. 000-52059)

10.1		Credit Agreement between PGT, Inc., PGT Industries, Inc., General Electric Capital Corporation, as administrative agent, collateral agent, swing line lender, L/C issuer and lender, GE Capital Markets, Inc. and SunTrust Robinson Humphrey, Inc. as joint lead arrangers and bookrunners, and SunTrust Bank, as syndication agent, L/C issuer, and lender, and the other lender named therein, dated as of June 23, 2011 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Current Report on Form 8-K dated June 23, 2011 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 23, 2011, Registration No. 000-52059.

10.2		PGT, Inc. 2004 Stock Incentive Plan, as amended (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to Amendment No. 1 to the Registration Statement of the Company on Form S-1, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 21, 2006, Registration No. 333-132365)

10.3		Form of PGT, Inc. 2004 Stock Incentive Plan Stock Option Agreement (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.6 to Amendment No. 1 to the Registration Statement of the Company on Form S-1, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 21, 2006, Registration No. 333-132365)

10.4		PGT, Inc. Amended and Restated 2006 Equity Incentive Plan (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.7 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 18, 2010, Registration No. 000-52059)

10.5		Form of PGT, Inc. 2006 Equity Incentive Plan Non-qualified Stock Option Agreement (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.8 to Amendment No. 3 to the Registration Statement of the Company on Form S-1, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 8, 2006, Registration No. 333-132365)

10.6		Form of Employment Agreement, dated February 20, 2009, between PGT Industries, Inc. and, individually, Rodney Hershberger, Jeffery T. Jackson, Mario Ferrucci III, Deborah L. LaPinska, Monte Burns, and David B. McCutcheon (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Current Report on Form 8-K dated February 20, 2009, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 26, 2009, Registration No. 000-52059)

10.7		Form of Director Indemnification Agreement (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.17 to Amendment No. 3 to the Registration Statement of the Company on Form S-1, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 8, 2006, Registration No. 333-132365)

10.8		Form of PGT, Inc. Rollover Stock Option Agreement (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.18 to Amendment No. 1 to the Registration Statement of the Company on Form S-1, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 21, 2006, Registration No. 333-132365)

10.9		Market Alliance Agreement between PGT Industries, Inc. and E.I. du Pont de Nemours and Company, dated February 27, 2009, with portions omitted pursuant to a request for confidential treatment (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Current Report on Form 8-K dated February 27, 2009, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 5, 2009, Registration No. 000-52059)

10.10		Form of PGT, Inc. 2006 Management Incentive Plan (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.23 to Amendment No. 3 to the Registration Statement of the Company on Form S-1, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 8, 2006, Registration No. 333-132365)



10.11		Form of PGT, Inc. 2006 Equity Incentive Plan Restricted Stock Award Agreement (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.24 to Amendment No. 3 to the Registration Statement of the Company on Form S-1, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 8, 2006, Registration No. 333-132365)

10.12		Form of PGT, Inc. 2006 Equity Incentive Plan Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.25 to Amendment No. 3 to the Registration Statement of the Company on Form S-1, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 8, 2006, Registration No. 333-132365)

10.13		Form of PGT, Inc. 2006 Equity Incentive Plan Incentive Stock Option Agreement (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.26 to Amendment No. 3 to the Registration Statement of the Company on Form S-1, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 8, 2006, Registration No. 333-132365

10.14		Form of PGT, Inc. 2006 Equity Incentive Plan Replacement Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.17 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 18, 2010, Registration No. 000-5205

10.15		Sales Contract, effective as of April 1, 2010, by and between E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company, through its Packaging & Industrial Polymers business and PGT Industries, Inc. (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Current Report on Form 8-K dated May 4, 2010 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 6, 2010, Registration No. 000-52059)

31.1*		Certification of chief executive officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

31.2*		Certification of chief financial officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

32.1**		Certification of chief executive officer and chief financial officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

101.INS		XBRL Instance Document**

101.SCH		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema**

101.CAL		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase**

101.LAB		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase**

101.PRE		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase**

*	Filed herewith.

**	Furnished herewith.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.


		PGT, INC.
		(Registrant)

Date: August 12, 2011		/s/ Rodney Hershberger
		Rodney Hershberger
		President and Chief Executive Officer

Date: August 12, 2011		/s/ Jeffrey T. Jackson
		Jeffrey T. Jackson
		Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

EXHIBIT INDEX


3.1		Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of PGT, Inc. (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 18, 2010, Registration No. 000-52059)

3.2		Amended and Restated By-Laws of PGT, Inc. (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 18, 2010, Registration No. 000-52059)

4.1		Form of Specimen Certificate (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Amendment No. 2 to the Registration Statement of the Company on Form S-1, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 26, 2006, Registration No. 333-132365)

4.2		Amended and Restated Security Holders’ Agreement, by and among PGT, Inc., JLL Partners Fund IV, L.P., and the stockholders named therein, dated as of June 27, 2006 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 11, 2006, Registration No. 000-52059)

4.3		PGT Savings Plan (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.5 to the Company’s Form S-8 Registration Statement, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on October 15, 2007, Registration No. 000-52059)

10.1		Credit Agreement between PGT, Inc., PGT Industries, Inc., General Electric Capital Corporation, as administrative agent, collateral agent, swing line lender, L/C issuer and lender, GE Capital Markets, Inc. and SunTrust Robinson Humphrey, Inc. as joint lead arrangers and bookrunners, and SunTrust Bank, as syndication agent, L/C issuer, and lender, and the other lender named therein, dated as of June 23, 2011 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Current Report on Form 8-K dated June 23, 2011 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 23, 2011, Registration No. 000-52059.

10.2		PGT, Inc. 2004 Stock Incentive Plan, as amended (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to Amendment No. 1 to the Registration Statement of the Company on Form S-1, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 21, 2006, Registration No. 333-132365)

10.3		Form of PGT, Inc. 2004 Stock Incentive Plan Stock Option Agreement (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.6 to Amendment No. 1 to the Registration Statement of the Company on Form S-1, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 21, 2006, Registration No. 333-132365)

10.4		PGT, Inc. Amended and Restated 2006 Equity Incentive Plan (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.7 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 18, 2010, Registration No. 000-52059)

10.5		Form of PGT, Inc. 2006 Equity Incentive Plan Non-qualified Stock Option Agreement (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.8 to Amendment No. 3 to the Registration Statement of the Company on Form S-1, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 8, 2006, Registration No. 333-132365)

10.6		Form of Employment Agreement, dated February 20, 2009, between PGT Industries, Inc. and, individually, Rodney Hershberger, Jeffery T. Jackson, Mario Ferrucci III, Deborah L. LaPinska, Monte Burns, and David B. McCutcheon (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Current Report on Form 8-K dated February 20, 2009, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 26, 2009, Registration No. 000-52059)


10.7		Form of Director Indemnification Agreement (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.17 to Amendment No. 3 to the Registration Statement of the Company on Form S-1, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 8, 2006, Registration No. 333-132365)

10.8		Form of PGT, Inc. Rollover Stock Option Agreement (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.18 to Amendment No. 1 to the Registration Statement of the Company on Form S-1, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 21, 2006, Registration No. 333-132365)

10.9		Market Alliance Agreement between PGT Industries, Inc. and E.I. du Pont de Nemours and Company, dated February 27, 2009, with portions omitted pursuant to a request for confidential treatment (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Current Report on Form 8-K dated February 27, 2009, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 5, 2009, Registration No. 000-52059)

10.10		Form of PGT, Inc. 2006 Management Incentive Plan (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.23 to Amendment No. 3 to the Registration Statement of the Company on Form S-1, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 8, 2006, Registration No. 333-132365)

10.11		Form of PGT, Inc. 2006 Equity Incentive Plan Restricted Stock Award Agreement (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.24 to Amendment No. 3 to the Registration Statement of the Company on Form S-1, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 8, 2006, Registration No. 333-132365)

10.12		Form of PGT, Inc. 2006 Equity Incentive Plan Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.25 to Amendment No. 3 to the Registration Statement of the Company on Form S-1, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 8, 2006, Registration No. 333-132365)

10.13		Form of PGT, Inc. 2006 Equity Incentive Plan Incentive Stock Option Agreement (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.26 to Amendment No. 3 to the Registration Statement of the Company on Form S-1, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 8, 2006, Registration No. 333-132365

10.14		Form of PGT, Inc. 2006 Equity Incentive Plan Replacement Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.17 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 18, 2010, Registration No. 000-5205

10.15		Sales Contract, effective as of April 1, 2010, by and between E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company, through its Packaging & Industrial Polymers business and PGT Industries, Inc. (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Current Report on Form 8-K dated May 4, 2010 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 6, 2010, Registration No. 000-52059)

31.1*		Certification of chief executive officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

31.2*		Certification of chief financial officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

32.1**		Certification of chief executive officer and chief financial officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

101.INS		XBRL Instance Document**

101.SCH		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema**

101.CAL		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase**

101.LAB		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase**

101.PRE		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase**

*	Filed herewith.

**	Furnished herewith.

Large accelerated filer

Accelerated filer

Non-accelerated filer

x (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

Smaller reporting company