Attached files
file | filename |
---|---|
EXCEL - IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT - Reef Global Energy VII, L.P. | Financial_Report.xls |
EX-32.2 - EX-32.2 - Reef Global Energy VII, L.P. | a11-14231_1ex32d2.htm |
EX-31.2 - EX-31.2 - Reef Global Energy VII, L.P. | a11-14231_1ex31d2.htm |
EX-32.1 - EX-32.1 - Reef Global Energy VII, L.P. | a11-14231_1ex32d1.htm |
EX-31.1 - EX-31.1 - Reef Global Energy VII, L.P. | a11-14231_1ex31d1.htm |
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
x |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the Quarterly Period Ended June 30, 2011
or
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the Transition Period from to
Commission File Number: 333-122935-02
REEF GLOBAL ENERGY VII, L.P.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Nevada (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) |
|
20-3963203 (I.R.S. employer identification no.) |
|
|
|
1901 N. Central Expressway, Suite 300 Richardson, Texas (Address of principal executive offices) |
|
75080-3610 (Zip code) |
(972)-437-6792
Registrants telephone number, including area code
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer o |
|
Accelerated filer o |
|
|
|
Non-accelerated filer o |
|
Smaller reporting company x |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No x
As of August 10, 2011, the registrant had 48.620 units of general partner interest held by the managing general partner, and 923.783 units of limited partner interest outstanding.
Reef Global Energy VII, L.P.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Reef Global Energy VII, L.P.
|
|
June 30, |
|
December 31, |
| ||
|
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
| ||
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Assets |
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Current assets: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
78,649 |
|
$ |
63,713 |
|
Accounts receivable from affiliates |
|
205,013 |
|
214,208 |
| ||
Total current assets |
|
283,662 |
|
277,921 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Oil and gas properties, full cost method of accounting: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Proved properties, net of accumulated depletion of $20,971,468 and $20,819,321 |
|
1,041,038 |
|
1,160,430 |
| ||
Net oil and gas properties |
|
1,041,038 |
|
1,160,430 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Total assets |
|
$ |
1,324,700 |
|
$ |
1,438,351 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Liabilities and partnership equity |
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Current liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Accounts payable |
|
$ |
6,316 |
|
$ |
12,081 |
|
Total current liabilities |
|
6,316 |
|
12,081 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Long-term liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Asset retirement obligation |
|
320,930 |
|
312,104 |
| ||
Total long-term liabilities |
|
320,930 |
|
312,104 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Partnership equity: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Limited partners |
|
854,047 |
|
966,390 |
| ||
Managing general partner |
|
143,407 |
|
147,776 |
| ||
Partnership equity |
|
997,454 |
|
1,114,166 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Total liabilities and partnership equity |
|
$ |
1,324,700 |
|
$ |
1,438,351 |
|
See accompanying notes to condensed financial statements (unaudited).
Reef Global Energy VII, L.P.
Condensed Statements of Operations
(Unaudited)
|
|
For the three months ended |
|
For the six months ended |
| ||||||||
|
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Oil, gas and NGL sales |
|
$ |
384,798 |
|
$ |
341,646 |
|
$ |
734,364 |
|
$ |
781,087 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Costs and expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Lease operating expenses |
|
78,720 |
|
46,566 |
|
156,126 |
|
112,725 |
| ||||
Production taxes |
|
30,008 |
|
(21,039 |
) |
53,021 |
|
(5,498 |
) | ||||
Depreciation, depletion and amortization |
|
72,371 |
|
139,479 |
|
152,147 |
|
296,301 |
| ||||
Accretion of asset retirement obligation |
|
4,451 |
|
4,053 |
|
8,826 |
|
8,044 |
| ||||
General and administrative |
|
74,414 |
|
74,172 |
|
139,593 |
|
166,731 |
| ||||
Total costs and expenses |
|
259,964 |
|
243,231 |
|
509,713 |
|
578,303 |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Income from operations |
|
124,834 |
|
98,415 |
|
224,651 |
|
202,784 |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Other income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Interest income |
|
22 |
|
62 |
|
45 |
|
125 |
| ||||
Total other income |
|
22 |
|
62 |
|
45 |
|
125 |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Net income |
|
$ |
124,856 |
|
$ |
98,477 |
|
$ |
224,696 |
|
$ |
202,909 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Net income per limited partner unit |
|
$ |
107.24 |
|
$ |
76.63 |
|
$ |
190.87 |
|
$ |
157.14 |
|
Net income per managing general partner unit |
|
$ |
530.45 |
|
$ |
569.50 |
|
$ |
994.99 |
|
$ |
1,187.66 |
|
See accompanying notes to condensed financial statements (unaudited).
Reef Global Energy VII, L.P.
Condensed Statements of Cash Flows
(Unaudited)
|
|
For the six months ended |
| ||||
|
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Cash flows from operating activities |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Net income |
|
$ |
224,696 |
|
$ |
202,909 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Adjustments for non-cash transactions: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Depreciation, depletion and amortization |
|
152,147 |
|
296,301 |
| ||
Accretion of asset retirement obligation |
|
8,826 |
|
8,044 |
| ||
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Accounts receivable |
|
|
|
3,471 |
| ||
Accounts receivable from affiliates |
|
9,195 |
|
236,077 |
| ||
Accounts payable |
|
|
|
(1,017 |
) | ||
Accounts payable to affiliates |
|
(5,765 |
) |
(70,096 |
) | ||
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
389,099 |
|
675,689 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Cash flows from investing activities |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Property acquisition and development |
|
(32,755 |
) |
(204,939 |
) | ||
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
(32,755 |
) |
(204,939 |
) | ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Cash flows from financing activities |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Partner distributions |
|
(341,408 |
) |
(470,536 |
) | ||
Net cash used in financing activities |
|
(341,408 |
) |
(470,536 |
) | ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents |
|
14,936 |
|
214 |
| ||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
|
63,713 |
|
63,432 |
| ||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
|
$ |
78,649 |
|
$ |
63,646 |
|
See accompanying notes to condensed financial statements (unaudited).
Reef Global Energy VII, L.P.
Notes to Condensed Financial Statements (unaudited)
June 30, 2011
1. Organization and Basis of Presentation
The condensed financial statements of Reef Global Energy VII, L.P. (the Partnership) have been prepared pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the SEC). Certain information and footnote disclosure normally included in annual financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States have been condensed or omitted pursuant to those rules and regulations. We have recorded all transactions and adjustments necessary to fairly present the financial statements included in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (this Quarterly Report). The adjustments are normal and recurring. The following notes describe only the material changes in accounting policies, account details, or financial statement notes during the first six months of 2011. Therefore, please read these condensed financial statements and notes to condensed financial statements together with the audited financial statements and notes to financial statements contained in the Partnerships Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2010 (the Annual Report).
2. Summary of Accounting Policies
Oil and Gas Properties
The Partnership follows the full cost method of accounting for oil and gas properties. Under this method, all direct costs and certain indirect costs associated with acquisition of properties and successful as well as unsuccessful exploration and development activities are capitalized. Depreciation, depletion, and amortization of capitalized oil and gas properties and estimated future development costs, excluding unproved properties, are based on the unit-of-production method using estimated proved reserves, as determined by independent petroleum engineers. For these purposes, proved natural gas reserves are converted to equivalent barrels of crude oil at a rate of 6 Mcf to 1 Bbl.
In applying the full cost method, the Partnership performs a quarterly ceiling test on the capitalized costs of oil and gas properties, whereby the capitalized costs of oil and gas properties are limited to the sum of the estimated future net revenues from proved reserves using prices that are the 12-month un-weighted arithmetic average of the first-day-of-the-month price for crude oil and natural gas held constant and discounted at 10%, plus the lower of cost or estimated fair value of unproved properties, if any. If capitalized costs exceed the ceiling, an impairment loss is recognized for the amount by which the capitalized costs exceed the ceiling, and is shown as a reduction of oil and gas properties and as property impairment expense on the Partnerships statements of operations. No gain or loss is recognized upon sale or disposition of oil and gas properties, unless such a sale would significantly alter the rate of depletion and amortization. During the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, the Partnership recognized no property impairment expense of proved properties.
Estimates of Proved Oil and Gas Reserves
Estimates of the Partnerships proved reserves at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 have been prepared and presented in accordance with SEC rules and accounting standards which require SEC reporting entities to prepare their reserve estimates using pricing based upon the un-weighted arithmetic average of the first-day-of-the-month commodity prices over the preceding 12-month period and current costs. Future prices and costs may be materially higher or lower than these prices and costs, which would impact the estimate of reserves and future cash flows.
Reserves and their relation to estimated future net cash flows impact the Partnerships depletion and impairment calculations. As a result, adjustments to depletion and impairment are made concurrently with changes to reserve estimates. If proved reserve estimates decline, the rate at which depletion expense is recorded increases, reducing net income. A decline in estimated proved reserves and future cash flows also reduces the capitalized cost ceiling and may result in increased impairment expense.
Restoration, Removal, and Environmental Liabilities
The Partnership is subject to extensive Federal, state and local environmental laws and regulations. These laws regulate the discharge of materials into the environment and may require the Partnership to remove or mitigate the environmental effects of the disposal or release of petroleum substances at various sites. Environmental expenditures are expensed or capitalized depending on their future economic benefit. Expenditures that relate to an existing condition caused by past operations and that have no future economic benefit are expensed.
Liabilities for expenditures of a non-capital nature are recorded when environmental assessments and/or remediation is probable, and the costs can be reasonably estimated. Such liabilities are generally undiscounted values unless the timing of cash payments for the liability or component is fixed or reliably determinable.
Asset retirement costs and liabilities associated with future site restoration and abandonment of long-lived assets are initially measured at fair value, which approximates the cost a third party would incur in performing the tasks necessary to retire such assets. The fair value is recognized in the financial statements as the present value of expected future cash expenditures for site restoration and abandonment. Subsequent to the initial measurement, the effect of the passage of time on the liability for the net asset retirement obligation (accretion expense) and the amortization of the asset retirement cost are recognized in the results of operations.
The following table summarizes the Partnerships asset retirement obligation for the six month period ended June 30, 2011 and the year ended December 31, 2010.
|
|
Six months ended |
|
Year Ended |
| ||
|
|
June 30, 2011 |
|
December 31, 2010 |
| ||
Beginning asset retirement obligation |
|
$ |
312,104 |
|
$ |
289,494 |
|
Additions related to well conversion |
|
|
|
6,162 |
| ||
Accretion expense |
|
8,826 |
|
16,448 |
| ||
Ending asset retirement obligation |
|
$ |
320,930 |
|
$ |
312,104 |
|
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
The estimated fair values for financial instruments have been determined at discrete points in time based on relevant market information. These estimates involve uncertainties and cannot be determined with precision. The estimated fair value of cash, accounts receivable, accounts receivable from affiliates, and accounts payable approximates their carrying value due to their short-term nature.
3. Transactions with Affiliates
The Partnership has no employees. Reef Exploration, L.P. (RELP), an affiliate of Reef Oil & Gas Partners, L.P. (Reef), the managing general partner of the Partnership, employs a staff including geologists, petroleum engineers, landmen and accounting personnel who administer all of the Partnerships operations. The Partnership reimburses RELP for technical and administrative services at cost. During the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2011, the Partnership incurred administrative costs totaling $36,339 and $78,859, respectively. The Partnership incurred no technical services costs during the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2011. During the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2010, the Partnership incurred technical services costs of $2,401 and $2,401, respectively, and administrative costs of $33,274 and $106,078, respectively. Technical services costs are capitalized as project costs on the condensed balance sheets. Administrative costs are included as general and administrative expenses on the condensed statements of operations.
Reef contributed 1% of all leasehold, drilling, and completion costs when incurred during the drilling and completion phases of Partnership operations. Reef contributed $202,585 in connection with this obligation. Reef also purchased 5% of the Partnership units and paid 5% of the 99% of these costs paid by the unit holders (4.95%).
RELP processes joint interest billings and revenue payments on behalf of the Partnership. At June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, RELP owed the Partnership $205,013 and $214,208, respectively, for net revenues processed in excess of joint interest and technical and administrative services charges. The cash associated with net revenues processed by RELP is normally received by RELP from oil and gas purchasers 30-60 days after the end of the month to which the revenues pertain. The Partnership settles its balances with Reef and RELP on at least a quarterly basis.
4. Commitments and Contingencies
On August 26, 2010, Frank Stevenson (Stevenson) filed a lawsuit, styled Stevenson v. Wayne Kirk, Michael J. Mauceli, Reef Global Energy Ventures II, et al., Cause No. 10-10647, in the 191st Judicial District Court, Dallas County, Texas. The suit also names as defendants Reef Global Energy VII, L.P. and multiple other Reef-sponsored ventures and limited partnerships, as well as Reef Securities, Inc., among others. On September 22, 2010, James and Carol Estle (the Estles) and Nancy Dykes Thurmond Antolic (Antolic) joined the suit as additional plaintiffs. On January 27, 2011, Donna Stevenson (Frank Stevensons spouse) and Jaimie Davis (Davis) joined the suit as additional plaintiffs. With respect to Daviss claims, specifically, Reef Securities, Inc. did not offer or sell the interests in the Reef program that Davis purchased. Rather, she purchased her interests through an unaffiliated broker/dealer. In the First Amended Petition, plaintiffs alleged that, collectively, they were seeking in excess of $1 million in compensatory damages as well as exemplary damages, attorneys fees, pre- and post-judgment interest, and costs. In the Second Amended Petition, plaintiffs seek an undisclosed, unspecified amount of damages. Plaintiffs assert claims of fraud, rescission under the Texas Securities Act, control person liability under the Texas Securities Act, and breach of fiduciary duty. Plaintiff Davis asserts against defendant Reef Oil & Gas Income and Development Fund, L.P. a claim for tortious interference with an existing contract. Defendants believe plaintiffs claims are meritless, and with respect to many of the Reef programs named in the petition, defendants believe that the claims for fraud are barred by limitations, as are any claims for rescission or breach of fiduciary duty with respect to those programs. In addition, with respect to all Reef programs in which plaintiffs participated, each plaintiff received offering documents that thoroughly disclosed all material facts and risks associated with participation in such programs, particularly the fact that no guarantees or promises could be made or relied upon. Defendants (including Reef Global Energy VII, L.P.) intend to vigorously defend the lawsuit and may seek damages from plaintiffs based upon, among other things, breaches of representations and warranties made by them as well as the indemnification provisions of the documents executed by each of them. As of this time, no substantive discovery has been conducted, and no trial date has been set. As of June 30, 2011 the Partnership has accrued no amounts related to this litigation.
5. Partnership Equity
Information regarding the number of units outstanding and the net income per type of Partnership unit for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2011 is detailed below:
For the three months ended June 30, 2011
Type of Unit |
|
Number of |
|
Net income |
|
Net income |
| ||
Managing general partner units |
|
48.620 |
|
$ |
25,790 |
|
$ |
530.45 |
|
Limited partner units |
|
923.783 |
|
99,066 |
|
$ |
107.24 |
| |
Total |
|
972.403 |
|
$ |
124,856 |
|
|
|
For the six months ended June 30, 2011
Type of Unit |
|
Number of |
|
Net income |
|
Net income |
| ||
Managing general partner units |
|
48.620 |
|
$ |
48,377 |
|
$ |
994.99 |
|
Limited partner units |
|
923.783 |
|
176,319 |
|
$ |
190.87 |
| |
Total |
|
972.403 |
|
$ |
224,696 |
|
|
|
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
The following is a discussion of the Partnerships financial condition, results of operations, liquidity and capital resources. This discussion should be read in conjunction with our financial statements and the related notes thereto, included in the Annual Report.
This Quarterly Report contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. You should exercise extreme caution with respect to all forward-looking statements made in this Quarterly Report. Specifically, the following statements are forward-looking:
· statements regarding the state of the oil and gas industry and the opportunity to profit within the oil and gas industry, competition, pricing, level of production, or the regulations that may affect the Partnership;
· statements regarding the plans and objectives of Reef for future operations, including, without limitation, the uses of Partnership funds and the size and nature of the costs the Partnership expects to incur and people and services the Partnership may employ;
· any statements using the words anticipate, believe, estimate, expect and similar such phrases or words; and
· any statements of other than historical fact.
Reef believes that it is important to communicate its future expectations to the partners. Forward-looking statements reflect the current view of management with respect to future events and are subject to numerous risks, uncertainties and assumptions, including, without limitation, the risk factors listed in the section captioned RISK FACTORS contained in the Partnerships Annual Report. Although Reef believes that the expectations reflected in such forward-looking statements are reasonable, Reef can give no assurance that such expectations will prove to have been correct. Should any one or more of these or other risks or uncertainties materialize or should any underlying assumptions prove incorrect, actual results are likely to vary materially from those described herein. There can be no assurance that the projected results will occur, that these judgments or assumptions will prove correct or that unforeseen developments will not occur.
Reef does not intend to update its forward-looking statements. All subsequent written and oral forward-looking statements attributable to Reef or persons acting on its behalf are expressly qualified in their entirety by the applicable cautionary statements.
Overview
Reef Global Energy VII, L.P. is a Nevada limited partnership formed to acquire, explore, develop and produce crude oil, natural gas, and natural gas liquids for the benefit of its investor partners. The Partnerships primary purposes are to generate revenues from the production of crude oil and natural gas, distribute cash flow to investors, and provide tax benefits to investors. The Partnership purchased working interests in five developmental prospects and participated in the drilling of ten successful developmental wells and three unsuccessful developmental wells on those prospects. All ten successful wells are productive at June 30, 2011. The Partnership purchased a working interest in the Sand Dunes developmental prospect in Eddy County, New Mexico, and has participated in the drilling of eight developmental wells on this prospect (see below). The Partnership purchased working interests in seven exploratory prospects and participated in the drilling of one successful exploratory well, six unsuccessful exploratory wells, and one successful developmental well on those prospects. The successful exploratory well ceased production during 2007. The Partnership completed its drilling program during the second quarter of 2008, having participated in the drilling of twenty-nine wells using the original capital raised by the Partnership. Subsequent to initial drilling operations, the Partnership is permitted to conduct additional drilling on existing Partnership prospects. The Partnership has not participated in and currently has no plans for participating in additional drilling activities.
In this Quarterly Report, we use the term successful to refer to wells that are drilled, tested, and either capable of or actually producing in commercial quantities. We use the term unsuccessful to refer to wells that do not meet one or more of these criteria.
The Partnership participated in the drilling of eight developmental wells on the Sand Dunes prospect located in Eddy County, New Mexico during the fourth quarter of 2007 and the first quarter of 2008. Initial testing confirmed the presence of crude oil and natural gas in all eight wells. However, the field was temporarily shut-in because of the lack of electric service and because of the high cost of trucking offsite the salt water volumes associated with the production of the crude oil and natural gas from the wells. Electrical service to the eight Sand Dunes wells was connected in September 2008. Based upon initial testing, larger bottom hole pumps were placed below the well perforations in three of the wells and testing was resumed in late September 2008 to determine the three wells commercial productivity. Water continued to be trucked offsite, and RELP applied for and received a permit which would allow for the conversion of one of the existing eight Sand Dunes wells into a water disposal well. RELP also explored the possibility of drilling a ninth well as a salt water disposal well for the field. Testing results on two of the three wells were positive, and salt water production volumes declined as a result of pumping off the wells using the larger bottom hole pumps. However, the price of crude oil also declined at a rapid rate while testing was being conducted. In late December 2008, two of the three testing wells were shut-in again. Crude oil prices continued declining to a level below $40 per barrel. In February 2009, following a mechanical failure in the third testing well, RELP, as operator, shut-in the field. The eight wells could not be commercially productive without efficient salt water disposal capabilities, and none of the options regarding salt water disposal were economically viable at first quarter 2009 commodity prices. As of December 31, 2008, the eight Sand Dunes wells were considered temporarily non-commercial until the conversion of one of the eight wells into a salt water disposal well was completed and commodity prices recovered.
Beginning with March 2009, oil prices increased from levels below $40 per barrel to between $60 and $70 per barrel by the third quarter of 2009. As a result of this increase in prices, in October 2009, Reef approved the conversion of one of the eight wells on the Sand Dunes development prospect located in Eddy County, New Mexico to a salt water disposal well. The conversion work on the well began in March 2010 and was completed during April 2010. Upon completion of the disposal facilities, the new disposal well became operational during August 2010. Based on the disposal capacity of the converted well, all of the remaining seven Sand Dunes wells were placed into production as of December 31, 2010. The cost of the well conversion to this Partnership was approximately $191,152. This cost was paid for by the Partnership by retaining a portion of the funds normally paid out in distributions to the partners. As of December 31, 2010, there were 2,350 BBL of crude oil and 2,650 Mcf of natural gas reserves net to the Partnerships interest for the wells placed on full time production during 2010.
As of June 30, 2011, four of the Sand Dunes wells were shut-in. Repair and maintenance work was performed on one shut-in well and it was returned to production during the third quarter of 2011. Reef continues to evaluate the remaining three shut-in wells.
Critical Accounting Policies
There have been no changes from the Critical Accounting Policies described in the Annual Report.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
The Partnership was funded with initial capital contributions totaling $24,127,769. Reef purchased 48.620 general partner units, or 5% of the total units sold, for $1,033,179. Investor partners purchased 741.001 units of general partner interest and 182.783 units of limited partner interest for $23,094,590. Reef also contributed $202,585 in connection with its obligation to pay 1% of all leasehold, drilling, and completion costs. Organization and offering costs totaled $3,464,188, leaving capital contributions of $20,866,166 available for Partnership activities. The Partnership expended $21,574,409 on prospect and property acquisitions, drilling and completion costs in connection with its participation in the drilling of twenty-nine wells and expended $137,512 on general and administrative expenses during its drilling and completion phase of operations. Expenditures in excess of available Partnership capital have been recovered from the cash flow from successful wells by reducing Partnership
distributions. Any additional capital expenditures will also be recovered from cash flow by reducing Partnership distributions. The Partnership does not operate in any other industry segment, and operates solely in the United States.
The Partnership has working capital of $277,346 at June 30, 2011. Subsequent to expending the initial available Partnership capital contributions on prospect acquisitions and drilling and completion costs of Partnership wells, the Partnerships working capital consists primarily of cash flows from productive properties utilized to pay cash distributions to investors.
Results of Operations
The following is a comparative discussion of the results of operations for the periods indicated. It should be read in conjunction with the unaudited condensed financial statements and the related notes to the unaudited condensed financial statements included in this Quarterly Report.
The following table provides information about sales volumes and crude oil and natural gas prices for the periods indicated. Equivalent barrels of oil (EBO) are computed by converting 6 Mcf of natural gas to 1 barrel of crude oil.
|
|
For the three months |
|
For the six months |
| ||||||||
|
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
| ||||
Sales volumes: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Crude oil (Barrels) |
|
3,099 |
|
3,270 |
|
6,143 |
|
6,957 |
| ||||
Natural gas (Mcf) |
|
12,262 |
|
24,959 |
|
29,122 |
|
52,608 |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Average sales prices received: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Crude oil (Barrels) |
|
$ |
100.77 |
|
$ |
71.84 |
|
$ |
93.66 |
|
$ |
72.23 |
|
Natural gas (Mcf) |
|
$ |
5.92 |
|
$ |
4.28 |
|
$ |
5.46 |
|
$ |
5.30 |
|
The estimated net proved crude oil and natural gas reserves as of June 30, 2011 and 2010 are summarized below. The quantities of proved crude oil and natural gas reserves discussed in this section include only the amounts which the Partnership reasonably expects to recover in the future from known oil and gas reservoirs under the current economic and operating conditions. Proved reserves include only quantities that the Partnership expects to recover commercially using current prices, costs, existing regulatory practices, and technology. Therefore, any changes in future prices, costs, regulations, technology or other unforeseen factors could materially increase or decrease the proved reserve estimates.
Net proved reserves |
|
Oil (Bbl) |
|
Gas (Mcf) |
|
June 30, 2011 |
|
42,539 |
|
188,743 |
|
June 30, 2010 |
|
40,682 |
|
163,620 |
|
Three months ended June 30, 2011 compared to the three months ended June 30, 2010
The Partnership had net income of $124,856 for the three month period ended June 30, 2011, compared to net income of $98,477 for the three month period ended June 30, 2010. Higher sales prices and lower depreciation, depletion, and amortization expense were the primary causes of the increase in net income.
Sales volumes declined during the three month period ended June 30, 2011 compared to the three month period ended June 30, 2010, primarily due to a natural decline in production volumes from the HBR A Big Gas well (HBR A). The HBR A well experienced an 85.9% decline in gas volumes from approximately 12,069 Mcf during the
three month period ended June 30, 2010 to approximately 1,707 Mcf during the three month period ended June 30, 2011. Sales volumes from the two most significant wells in which the Partnership has an interest, the Rob L RA SUA CL&F #1 (Gumbo II) and the HBR A, totaled 1,934 barrels of crude oil and 9,266 Mcf of natural gas, or 62.4% and 75.6% of sales volumes for the three month period ended June 30, 2011, respectively. During the three month period ended June 30, 2010, the Partnerships share of sales volumes from these two wells totaled 1,954 barrels of crude oil and 21,589 Mcf of natural gas, or 59.8% and 86.5% of the Partnerships total sales volumes, respectively. The natural decline in production volumes from the wells in which the Partnership owns an interest will lead to continuing declines in sales volumes in future periods. The current estimated reserve life of the HBR A well is estimated to be approximately 30 months using current prices and costs.
Sales prices for crude oil rose by 40.3%, to an average price of $100.77 per Bbl for the three month period ended June 30, 2011, compared to an average price of $71.84 for the three month period ended June 30, 2010. Sales prices for natural gas increased by 38.3%, to an average price of $5.92 per Mcf during the three month period ended June 30, 2011, compared to an average price of $4.28 received for during the three month period ended June 30, 2010. As a result, sales revenues increased by approximately $43,000, or 12.6% on a comparative basis, despite the decline in sales volumes.
Lease operating expenses increased from $46,566 during the three month period ended June 30, 2010 to $78,720 during the three month period ended June 30, 2011, primarily due to increased salt water disposal costs, direct labor costs, and workover expenses on the eight Cole Ranch wells. In addition, operating costs also increased as a result of returning the Sand Dunes wells to production during the third and fourth quarters of 2010.
Production taxes increased during the three month period ended June 30, 2011 compared to the three month period ended June 30, 2010 due to the timing of an adjustment received from the operator of the Gumbo II well. During the second quarter of 2010, the Partnership received a severance tax credit from the operator of the Gumbo II well, because the well obtained a severance tax exemption from the State of Louisiana for the period from inception through February 2010. This one time tax adjustment resulted in the Partnership showing a negative amount for severance taxes during the second quarter of 2010.
The Partnership incurred $72,371 of depletion, depreciation, and amortization expense during the three month period ended June 30, 2011 compared to $139,749 of depletion, depreciation, and amortization expense during the three month period ended June 30, 2010. This decrease is primarily due to the combination of declining production and rising oil prices between the comparative periods.
General and administrative costs increased slightly from $74,172 incurred during the three month period ended June 30, 2010 to $74,414 incurred during the three month period ended June 30, 2011. Increased professional fees were offset by decreased legal fees and overhead charges from RELP. The allocation of RELPs overhead to partnerships is based upon several factors, including the level of drilling activity, revenues, and capital and operating expenditures of each partnership compared to the total levels of all partnerships. The administrative overhead charge to the Partnership decreased from $33,745 for the three month period ended June 30, 2010 to $32,987 for the three month period ended June 30, 2011.
Six months ended June 30, 2011 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2010
The Partnership had net income of $224,696 for the six month period ended June 30, 2011, compared to net income of $202,909 for the six month period ended June 30, 2010. Lower depletion, depreciation, and amortization expenses offset a decline in sales revenues and increases in lease operating and production tax expenses.
Sales volumes declined during the six month period ended June 30, 2011 compared to the six month period ended June 30, 2010, primarily due to decreased volumes from the HBR A Big Gas Unit (HBR A). The HBR A well experienced an 80.1% decline in gas volumes from approximately 26,871 Mcf during the six month period ended June 30, 2010 to approximately 5,356 Mcf during the six month period ended June 30, 2011. Sales volumes from the two most significant wells in which the Partnership has an interest, the Rob L RA SUA CL&F #1 (Gumbo II) and the HBR A, totaled 3,934 barrels of crude oil and 22,786 Mcf of natural gas, or 64.0% and 78.2% of sales volumes for the six month period ended June 30, 2011, respectively. During the six month period ended June 30, 2010, the
Partnerships share of sales volumes from these two wells totaled 4,088 barrels of crude oil and 45,574 Mcf of natural gas, or 58.8% and 86.6% of the Partnerships total sales volumes, respectively. Because the Partnership has completed its drilling program and is currently just producing its reserves, it is expected that natural declines in production from existing Partnership wells will continue to result in quarterly declines in sales volumes. The current estimated reserve life of the HBR A well is estimated to be approximately 30 months using current prices and costs.
Sales prices for crude oil rose by 29.7%, to an average price of $93.66 per Bbl for the six month period ended June 30, 2011, compared to an average price of $72.23 for the six month period ended June 30, 2010. Sales prices for natural gas increased by 3.0%, to an average price of $5.46 per Mcf during the six month period ended June 30, 2011, compared to an average price of $5.30 received for during the six month period ended June 30, 2010. The increase in prices was not enough to offset the decline in volumes, and total sales revenues decreased by 6.0% for the six month period ended June 30, 2011. The Partnership has not and is currently not engaged in commodity futures trading, hedging activities, or derivative financial instrument transactions for trading or other speculative purposes. The Partnership sells a vast majority of its production from successful oil and gas wells on a month-to-month basis at current spot market prices. Accordingly, the Partnership is at risk for the volatility in commodity prices inherent in the oil and gas industry, and the level of commodity prices has a significant impact on the Partnerships results of operations. Oil prices have subsequently moved downward from the high point achieved during the second quarter of 2011.
Lease operating expenses increased from $112,725 during the six month period ended June 30, 2010 to $156,126 during the six month period ended June 30, 2011, primarily due to increased repairs and maintenance and workover expenses on the eight Cole Ranch wells, and increased marketing and gathering expenses on the Gumbo II well. In addition, operating costs also increased as a result of returning the Sand Dunes wells to production during the third and fourth quarters of 2010.
Production taxes increased during the six month period ended June 30, 2011 compared to the six month period ended June 30, 2010 due to a one time severance tax adjustment received from the operator of the Gumbo II well. During the second quarter of 2010, the Partnership received a severance tax credit from the operator of the Gumbo II well, because the well obtained a severance tax exemption from the State of Louisiana for the period from inception through February 2010. This one time tax adjustment resulted in the Partnership showing a negative amount for severance taxes during the six month period ended June 30, 2010.
The Partnership incurred $152,147 of depletion, depreciation, and amortization expense during the six month period ended June 30, 2011 compared to $296,301 of depletion, depreciation, and amortization expense during the six month period ended June 30, 2010. This decrease is primarily due to the combination of declining production and rising oil prices between the comparative periods.
General and administrative costs decreased from $166,731 incurred during the six month period ended June 30, 2010 to $139,593 incurred during the six month period ended June 30, 2011, primarily due to decreased overhead charges from RELP. The allocation of RELPs overhead to partnerships is based upon several factors, including the level of drilling activity, revenues, and capital and operating expenditures of each partnership compared to the total levels of all partnerships. The administrative overhead charge to the Partnership decreased from $96,372 for the six month period ended June 30, 2010 to $68,490 for the six month period ended June 30, 2011.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
The Partnership is a smaller reporting company as defined by Rule 12b-2 promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act), and as such, is not required to provide the information required under this Item.
Item 4T. Controls and Procedures
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
As the managing general partner of the Partnership, Reef maintains a system of controls and procedures designed to provide reasonable assurance as to the reliability of the financial statements and other disclosures included in this
report, as well as to safeguard assets from unauthorized use or disposition. The Partnership, under the supervision and with participation of its management, including the principal executive officer and principal financial officer, evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of its disclosure controls and procedures as such term is defined in Rule 13a-15(e) promulgated under the Exchange Act, as of the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report. Based on that evaluation, the principal executive officer and principal financial officer have concluded that the Partnerships disclosure controls and procedures are effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Partnership in reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in SEC rules and forms, and includes controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in such reports is accumulated and communicated to our management, including the principal executive officer and principal financial officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding financial disclosure.
Changes in Internal Controls
There have not been any changes in the Partnerships internal controls over financial reporting during the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2011 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Partnerships internal control over financial reporting.
On August 26, 2010, Frank Stevenson (Stevenson) filed a lawsuit, styled Stevenson v. Wayne Kirk, Michael J. Mauceli, Reef Global Energy Ventures II, et al., Cause No. 10-10647, in the 191st Judicial District Court, Dallas County, Texas. The suit also names as defendants Reef Global Energy VII, L.P. and multiple other Reef-sponsored ventures and limited partnerships, as well as Reef Securities, Inc., among others. On September 22, 2010, James and Carol Estle (the Estles) and Nancy Dykes Thurmond Antolic (Antolic) joined the suit as additional plaintiffs. On January 27, 2011, Donna Stevenson (Frank Stevensons spouse) and Jaimie Davis (Davis) joined the suit as additional plaintiffs. With respect to Daviss claims, specifically, Reef Securities, Inc. did not offer or sell the interests in the Reef program that Davis purchased. Rather, she purchased her interests through an unaffiliated broker/dealer. In the First Amended Petition, plaintiffs alleged that, collectively, they were seeking in excess of $1 million in compensatory damages as well as exemplary damages, attorneys fees, pre- and post-judgment interest, and costs. In the Second Amended Petition, plaintiffs seek an undisclosed, unspecified amount of damages. Plaintiffs assert claims of fraud, rescission under the Texas Securities Act, control person liability under the Texas Securities Act, and breach of fiduciary duty. Plaintiff Davis asserts against defendant Reef Oil & Gas Income and Development Fund, L.P. a claim for tortious interference with an existing contract. Defendants believe plaintiffs claims are meritless, and with respect to many of the Reef programs named in the petition, defendants believe that the claims for fraud are barred by limitations, as are any claims for rescission or breach of fiduciary duty with respect to those programs. In addition, with respect to all Reef programs in which plaintiffs participated, each plaintiff received offering documents that thoroughly disclosed all material facts and risks associated with participation in such programs, particularly the fact that no guarantees or promises could be made or relied upon. Defendants (including Reef Global Energy VII, L.P.) intend to vigorously defend the lawsuit and may seek damages from plaintiffs based upon, among other things, breaches of representations and warranties made by them as well as the indemnification provisions of the documents executed by each of them. As of this time, no substantive discovery has been conducted, and no trial date has been set. As of June 30, 2011, the Partnership has accrued no amounts related to this litigation.
There were no material changes in the Risk Factors applicable to the Partnership as set forth in the Annual Report.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
None.
Item 3. Default Upon Senior Securities
None.
Item 4. (Removed and Reserved)
None.
Exhibits |
|
|
|
|
|
31.1 |
|
Certification of Principal Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
31.2 |
|
Certification of Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
32.1 |
|
Certification of the Principal Executive Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
32.2 |
|
Certification of the Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
101.INS |
|
XBRL Instance Document |
|
|
|
101.SCH |
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document |
|
|
|
101.CAL |
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document |
|
|
|
101.LAB |
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Labels Linkbase Document |
|
|
|
101.PRE |
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document |
|
|
|
101.DEF |
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document |
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
REEF GLOBAL ENERGY VII, L.P. | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
By: |
Reef Oil & Gas Partners, L.P. |
|
|
|
Managing General Partner |
|
|
|
|
|
|
By: |
Reef Oil & Gas Partners, GP, LLC, |
|
|
|
its general partner |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dated: |
August 11, 2011 |
By: |
/s/ Michael J. Mauceli |
|
|
|
Michael J. Mauceli |
|
|
|
Manager and Member |
|
|
|
(Principal Executive Officer) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dated: |
August 11, 2011 |
By: |
/s/ Daniel C. Sibley |
|
|
|
Daniel C. Sibley |
|
|
|
Chief Financial Officer and General Counsel of |
|
|
|
Reef Exploration, L.P. |
|
|
|
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) |
|
|
|
|
EXHIBIT INDEX
Exhibits |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
31.1 |
|
Certification of Principal Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
|
|
31.2 |
|
Certification of Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
|
|
32.1 |
|
Certification of the Principal Executive Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
|
|
32.2 |
|
Certification of the Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
|
|
101.INS |
|
XBRL Instance Document |
|
|
|
|
|
101.SCH |
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document |
|
|
|
|
|
101.CAL |
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document |
|
|
|
|
|
101.LAB |
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Labels Linkbase Document |
|
|
|
|
|
101.PRE |
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document |
|
|
|
|
|
101.DEF |
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document |