Attached files
| file | filename |
|---|---|
| EX-32.2 - JPF EXHIBIT 32.2 - AMBASE CORP | jpfexh322.htm |
| EX-31.1 - RAB EXHIBIT 31.1 - AMBASE CORP | rabexh311.htm |
| EX-32.1 - RAB EXHIBIT 32.1 - AMBASE CORP | rabexh321.htm |
| EX-31.2 - JPF EXHIBIT 31.2 - AMBASE CORP | jpfexh312.htm |
| EXCEL - IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT - AMBASE CORP | Financial_Report.xls |
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
[X] Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2011
or
[ ] Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
Commission file number 1-7265
AMBASE CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
Delaware
(State of incorporation)
|
95-2962743
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
|
|
100 PUTNAM GREEN, 3RD FLOOR
GREENWICH, CONNECTICUT 06830
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)
(203) 532-2000
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
YES X NO ______
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definition of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer”, and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large Accelerated Filer Accelerated Filer Non-Accelerated Filer X Smaller Reporting Company ____
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
YES NO X .
At July 30, 2011, there were 43,075,410 shares outstanding of the registrant’s common stock, $0.01 par value per share.
AmBase Corporation
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
June 30, 2011
TABLE OF CONTENTS
|
PART I
|
FINANCIAL INFORMATION
|
Page
|
|
|
Item 1.
|
Financial Statements (unaudited)
|
1
|
|
|
Item 2.
|
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
|
14
|
|
|
Item 3.
|
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
|
16
|
|
|
Item 4T.
|
Controls and Procedures
|
17
|
|
|
PART II
|
OTHER INFORMATION
|
||
|
Item 1.
|
Legal Proceedings
|
18
|
|
|
Item 1A.
|
Risk Factors
|
18
|
|
|
Item 2.
|
Unregistered Sales of Equity and Securities and Use of Proceeds
|
18
|
|
|
Item 3.
|
Defaults Upon Senior Securities
|
18
|
|
|
Item 5.
|
Other Information
|
18
|
|
|
Item 6.
|
Exhibits
|
18
|
|
|
Signatures
|
19
|
PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
AMBASE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Balance Sheets
(Unaudited)
(in thousands, except for share and per share mounts)
|
Assets:
|
June 30,
2011
|
December 31,
2010
|
||||||
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
$ | 893 | $ | 1,334 | ||||
|
Held to maturity investments (market value $7,700 and $8,199, respectively)
|
7,700 | 8,200 | ||||||
|
Real estate owned:
|
||||||||
|
Land
|
554 | 554 | ||||||
|
Buildings
|
1,900 | 1,900 | ||||||
|
Real estate owned, gross
|
$ | 2,454 | 2,454 | |||||
|
Accumulated depreciation
|
(509 | ) | (485 | ) | ||||
|
Real estate owned, net
|
1,945 | 1,969 | ||||||
|
Other assets
|
296 | 259 | ||||||
|
Total assets
|
$ | 10,834 | $ | 11,762 | ||||
|
Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity:
|
||||||||
|
Liabilities:
|
||||||||
|
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities
|
$ | 138 | $ | 220 | ||||
|
Other liabilities
|
6 | 2 | ||||||
|
Total liabilities
|
144 | 222 | ||||||
|
Commitments and contingencies (Note 3)
|
||||||||
|
Stockholders’ equity:
|
||||||||
|
Common stock ($0.01 par value, 200,000,000 authorized, 46,410,007 issued and 43,075,410 outstanding in 2011 and 2010)
|
464 | 464 | ||||||
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
548,044 | 548,044 | ||||||
|
Accumulated deficit
|
(535,709 | ) | (534,859 | ) | ||||
|
Treasury stock, at cost - 3,334,597 shares
|
(2,109 | ) | (2,109 | ) | ||||
|
Total stockholders’ equity
|
10,690 | 11,540 | ||||||
|
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity
|
$ | 10,834 | $ | 11,762 | ||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
AMBASE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Statements of Operations
Second Quarter and Six Months Ended June 30
(Unaudited)
(in thousands, except per share data)
|
Second Quarter
|
Six Months
|
|||||||||||||||
|
2011
|
2010
|
2011
|
2010
|
|||||||||||||
|
Operating expenses:
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Compensation and benefits
|
$ | 336 | $ | 359 | $ | 668 | $ | 776 | ||||||||
|
Professional and outside services
|
84 | 101 | 137 | 151 | ||||||||||||
|
Property operating and maintenance
|
21 | 37 | 50 | 69 | ||||||||||||
|
Depreciation
|
12 | 12 | 24 | 25 | ||||||||||||
|
Insurance
|
11 | 17 | 19 | 24 | ||||||||||||
|
Other operating
|
20 | 22 | 47 | 52 | ||||||||||||
|
Total operating expenses
|
484 | 548 | 945 | 1,097 | ||||||||||||
|
Operating loss
|
(484 | ) | (548 | ) | (945 | ) | (1,097 | ) | ||||||||
|
Interest income
|
2 | 4 | 5 | 9 | ||||||||||||
|
Realized gains on sales of investment securities
|
9 | 9 | 15 | 19 | ||||||||||||
|
Other income
|
105 | - | 105 | - | ||||||||||||
|
Loss before income taxes
|
(368 | ) | (535 | ) | (820 | ) | (1,069 | ) | ||||||||
|
Income tax expense
|
(15 | ) | (11 | ) | (30 | ) | (22 | ) | ||||||||
|
Net loss
|
$ | (383 | ) | $ | (546 | ) | $ | (850 | ) | $ | (1,091 | ) | ||||
|
Net loss per share attributable to common stockholders - basic
|
$ | (0.01 | ) | $ | (0.01 | ) | $ | (0.02 | ) | $ | (0.02 | ) | ||||
|
Net loss per share attributable to common stockholders - assuming dilution
|
$ | (0.01 | ) | $ | (0.01 | ) | $ | (0.02 | ) | $ | (0.02 | ) | ||||
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding - Basic
|
43,075 | 43,075 | 43,075 | 43,075 | ||||||||||||
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding - Assuming dilution
|
43,075 | 43,075 | 43,075 | 43,075 | ||||||||||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
AMBASE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
Six Months Ended June 30
(Unaudited)
|
(in thousands)
|
2011
|
2010
|
||||||
|
Cash flows from operating activities:
|
||||||||
|
Net loss
|
$ | (850 | ) | $ | (1,091 | ) | ||
|
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used by operating activities:
|
||||||||
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
24 | 25 | ||||||
|
Realized gains on sales of investment securities
|
(15 | ) | (19 | ) | ||||
|
Changes in other assets and liabilities:
|
||||||||
|
Accrued interest receivable on investment securities
|
- | 8 | ||||||
|
Other assets
|
(37 | ) | 35 | |||||
|
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities
|
(82 | ) | (174 | ) | ||||
|
Other liabilities
|
4 | (5 | ) | |||||
|
Net cash used by operating activities
|
(956 | ) | (1,221 | ) | ||||
|
Cash flows from investing activities:
|
||||||||
|
Maturities of investment securities - held to maturity
|
16,096 | 19,384 | ||||||
|
Purchases of investment securities - held to maturity
|
(15,596 | ) | (18,394 | ) | ||||
|
Sales of investment securities
|
552 | 649 | ||||||
|
Purchases of investments securities
|
(537 | ) | (630 | ) | ||||
|
Investment in real estate limited partnership
|
- | (300 | ) | |||||
|
Net cash provided by investing activities
|
515 | 709 | ||||||
|
Net change in cash and cash equivalents
|
(441 | ) | (512 | ) | ||||
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year
|
1,334 | 1,715 | ||||||
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
|
$ | 893 | $ | 1,203 | ||||
|
Supplemental cash flow disclosure:
|
||||||||
|
Income taxes paid
|
$ | 41 | $ | 65 | ||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
AMBASE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 1 - Organization
The accompanying consolidated financial statements of AmBase Corporation and its wholly-owned subsidiaries (the “Company”) are unaudited and subject to year-end adjustments. All material intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated. In the opinion of management, the interim financial statements reflect all adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring adjustments unless otherwise disclosed, necessary for a fair presentation of the Company’s financial position, results of operations and cash flows. Results for interim periods are not necessarily indicative of results for the full year. The consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions, that it deems reasonable, that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from such estimates and assumptions. The unaudited interim financial statements presented herein are condensed and should be read in conjunction with the Company’s consolidated financial statements filed in its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010.
The Company’s assets currently consist primarily of cash and cash equivalents, investment securities, and real estate. The Company currently earns non-operating revenue principally consisting of earnings on investment securities and cash equivalents. The Company continues to evaluate a number of possible acquisitions, and is engaged in the management of its assets and liabilities, including the contingent assets, as described in Part II - Item 1. From time to time, the Company and its subsidiaries may be named as a defendant in various lawsuits or proceedings. The Company intends to aggressively contest all litigation and contingencies, as well as pursue all sources for contributions to settlements.
The Company’s management believes that operating cash needs for the next twelve months will be met principally by the Company’s current financial resources and to a lesser extent the receipt of earnings on investment securities and cash equivalents.
Note 2 – Recent Accounting Pronouncements
There are no new accounting pronouncements that would materially affect the Company’s financial statements.
AMBASE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 3 - Legal Proceedings
The information contained in Item 8 - Note 10 in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010, is incorporated by reference herein and the defined terms set forth below have the same meaning ascribed to them in that report. There have been no material developments in such legal proceedings, except as set forth below.
The Company is or has been a party in a number of lawsuits or proceedings, including the following:
Supervisory Goodwill Litigation - On February 12 and 17, 2009, the Court heard closing arguments. At the conclusion of closing arguments, the Court ruled that the FDIC and DOJ could file short supplemental briefs addressing certain limited issues by March 6, 2009, and that the Company could file a short responsive brief which was filed on March 25, 2009. In May 2009, the DOJ requested and simultaneously filed with the Court an additional supplemental brief. The Court granted the DOJ’s motion and permitted the DOJ’s additional supplemental brief. The Company subsequently requested and the Court allowed the Company to file a responsive supplemental brief to the DOJ brief which was filed in June 2009. The Company does not know when the Court will issue its final decision. The Company believes any decision rendered by Judge Smith on damages, as well as his decision relating to his authority to review and consider the validity of the alleged receivership deficit, will likely be appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.
Both the Court of Federal Claims and the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit have issued numerous decisions in cases that involve claims against the United States based upon its breach of its contracts with savings and loan institutions through its 1989 enactment of FIRREA. In particular, the Federal Circuit has issued decisions rejecting Takings Clause claims advanced by shareholders of failed thrifts. Examples of such decisions include Castle v. United States, 301 F.3d 1328 (Fed. Cir. 2002) and Bailey v. United States, 341 F. 3d 1342 (Fed. Cir 2003). In June 2004, the United States Supreme Court denied the petition for certiorari filed by Bailey. The Court of Federal Claims decisions and certain filings in the Company’s case, as well as other decisions in Winstar related cases, are publicly available on the Court of Federal Claims web site at www.uscfc.uscourts.gov. In addition, decisions in Winstar-related cases that have been issued by the U.S. Court of Appeals, the court that hears appeals from decisions by the Court of Federal Claims, may be found on that court’s website at www.cafc.uscourts.gov. Decisions in other Winstar related cases may be relevant to the Company’s Supervisory Goodwill claims, but are not necessarily indicative of the ultimate outcome of the Company’s actions. The Company can give no assurances regarding the ultimate outcome of the Supervisory Goodwill Litigation.
Federal income tax refund suit on Carryback Claims. In March 2000, the Company filed with the IRS several claims and amendments to previously filed claims with respect to the Carryback Claims, seeking refunds from the IRS of alternative minimum tax and other federal income taxes paid by the Company in prior years, plus applicable IRS interest, based on the filing of the 1992 Amended Return. In February 2005, the IRS formally disallowed the Carryback Claims. On April 29, 2008, the Company filed suit with respect to the Carryback Claims in the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut, seeking federal tax refunds for tax year 1989, plus interest. On September 29, 2009, the U.S. Department of Justice (“DOJ”), representing defendant United States in the suit, filed a Motion to Dismiss. In response, on October 19, 2009, the Company filed its opposition to the Government’s Motion to Dismiss, as well as the Company’s own Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. In June 2010, the Court issued a Memorandum Decision conditionally granting the United States’ Motion to Dismiss the case but allowing the Company to conduct limited discovery to establish whether the Court has jurisdiction. On August 30, 2010, the Company filed a Motion to Set Aside the Court’s Conditional Order of Dismissal. On February 28, 2011, the Court granted the Company’s motion and issued a Memorandum of Decision concluding that the Company had timely filed a refund claim for tax year 1992 seeking to adjust the amount of bad debt deduction and that the case should not be dismissed. In March 2011, the Company filed a Motion for Partial Summary Judgment based on the Court’s ruling that the Company’s refund claims were timely filed. In May 2011, the DOJ filed a Cross Motion for Summary Judgment and an opposition to the Company’s Summary Judgment Motion. In June 2011, the Company filed a Memorandum in Opposition to the Government’s Cross Motion for Summary Judgment and a Reply to the Governments Opposition to the Company’s Summary Judgment Motion, and the Government in June 2011, subsequently filed a response brief. The Court’s rulings to date are not dispositive of the case. The Company can give no assurances as to the final amount of refunds, if any, or when they might be received. See Note 8 – Income Taxes for further information.
Note 4 - Cash and Cash Equivalents
Highly liquid investments, consisting principally of funds held in short-term money market accounts with original maturities of less than three months, are classified as cash equivalents.
AMBASE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 5 - Investment Securities
Investment securities - held to maturity, consist of U.S. Treasury Bills with original maturities of three months or more and are carried at amortized cost (which includes accrued interest), based upon the Company’s intent and ability to hold these investments to maturity.
Investment securities consist of the following:
|
June 30, 2011
|
December 31, 2010
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
(in thousands)
|
Carrying Value
|
Cost or Amortized Cost
|
Fair Value
|
Carrying Value
|
Cost or Amortized Cost
|
Fair Value
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
Held to Maturity:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
U.S. Treasury Bills
|
$ | 7,700 | $ | 7,700 | $ | 7,700 | $ | 8,200 | $ | 8,200 | $ | 8,199 | ||||||||||||
The gross unrealized gains (losses) on investment securities consist of the following:
(in thousands)
|
Held to Maturity:
|
June 30, 2011
|
December 31, 2010
|
||||||
|
Gross unrealized gains (losses)
|
$ | - | $ | (1 | ) | |||
Realized gains on the sales of investment securities available for sale follow:
(in thousands)
|
($ in thousands)
|
Second Quarter Ending June 30
|
Year-to-Date June 30
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
2011
|
2010
|
2011
|
2010
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
Net sale proceeds
|
$ | 435 | $ | 440 | $ | 552 | $ | 649 | ||||||||||||
|
Cost basis
|
(426 | ) | (431 | ) | (537 | ) | (630 | ) | ||||||||||||
|
Realized gains
|
$ | 9 | $ | 9 | $ | 15 | $ | 19 | ||||||||||||
AMBASE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 6 – Property Owned
The Company owns one commercial office building in Greenwich, Connecticut that contains approximately 14,500 square feet. The Company utilizes approximately 3,500 square feet for its executive offices; the remaining space is currently unoccupied and available for lease. Depreciation expense for the building is calculated on a straight-line basis over 39 years. Tenant improvements, if any, would be depreciated over the lesser of the remaining life of the tenants’ lease or the estimated useful lives of the improvements.
Although the portion of the building not being utilized by the Company is currently unoccupied and available for lease, based on the Company’s analysis, the Company believes the property’s fair value exceeds the property’s current carrying value. The Company’s impairment analysis includes a comprehensive range of factors including but not limited to: the location of the property; property condition; current market conditions; comparable sales; current market rents in the area; new building zoning restrictions; raw land values; new building construction costs; building operating costs; leasing values; and cap rates for comparable buildings in the area. Varying degrees of weight are given each factor. Based on the Company’s analysis these factors taken together and/or considered individually form the basis for the Company’s analysis that no impairment condition exists.
The Company performs impairment tests if events or circumstances indicate that the property’s carrying value would not be recoverable. As noted above, based on the Company’s analysis the Company believes the carrying value of the property as of June 30, 2011, has not been impaired and; therefore, the carrying value of the asset is fully recoverable by the Company.
Note 7 - Income Taxes
The Company and its domestic subsidiaries file a consolidated federal income tax return. The Company recognizes both the current and deferred tax consequences of all transactions that have been recognized in the financial statements, calculated based on the provisions of enacted tax laws, including the tax rates in effect for current and future years. Net deferred tax assets are recognized immediately when a more likely than not criterion is met; that is, greater than 50% probability exists that the tax benefits will actually be realized sometime in the future.
The Company has calculated a net deferred tax asset of $40 million as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, arising primarily from net operating loss (“NOL”) carryforwards and alternative minimum tax (“AMT”) credits. This amount does not include the anticipated tax effects of NOL’s which could be generated from the Company’s investment in Carteret Savings Bank, F.A. and subsidiaries (“Carteret”), resulting from the election decision, as more fully described below. A valuation allowance has been established for the entire net deferred tax asset as management, at the current time, has no basis to conclude that realization is more likely than not.
There were no unrecognized tax benefits at June 30, 2011 or December 31, 2010. Further, no significant changes in unrecognized income tax benefits are currently expected to occur over the next year. Interest and/or penalties related to underpayments of income taxes, if applicable, would be included in interest expense and operating expenses, respectively. The accompanying financial statements do not include any amounts for any such interest and/or penalties. The Company’s federal income tax returns for the years subsequent to 1992 have not been reviewed by the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) or state authorities. In October 2009, the Company received notification from the IRS that they would be reviewing the Company’s 2007 federal income tax return. In connection with the IRS audit, in April 2010, the IRS issued the Company a Notice of Proposed Adjustment for tax year 2007, proposing to disallow approximately $16.6 million of deductions previously recognized by the Company on its 2007 Federal income tax return (the “IRS Proposed Adjustment”). The IRS Proposed Adjustment seeks to disallow the Company’s tax deduction for the payment made by the Company in 2007 in satisfaction of its Supplemental Retirement Plan obligation. This matter is currently ongoing. The Company has not been notified of any potential tax audits by any state or local tax authorities. As such, the Company believes the statute of limitations for federal and state purposes are generally closed for tax years prior to 2007.
AMBASE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Based upon the Company’s federal income tax returns as filed through 2009 (subject to IRS audit adjustments), excluding all effects of the inclusion of Carteret/Carteret FSB from December 4, 1992 forward, as further discussed herein, the Company has NOL carryforwards available to reduce future federal taxable income which expire if unused in the tax years as indicated below. The amounts as of June 30, 2011, are as follows:
|
Tax
Year Expiring
|
Amount
|
|||
|
2012
|
$ | 1,100,000 | ||
|
2018
|
5,400,000 | |||
|
2019
|
4,000,000 | |||
|
2020
|
2,600,000 | |||
|
2021
|
4,000,000 | |||
|
2022
|
3,200,000 | |||
|
2023
|
1,800,000 | |||
|
2024
|
700,000 | |||
|
2026
|
2,800,000 | |||
|
2027
|
3,100,000 | |||
|
2028
|
4,600,000 | |||
|
2029
|
2,400,000 | |||
|
Total
|
$ | 35,700,000 | ||
In addition to the NOL carryforwards noted herein, the Company currently estimates that, an additional $16.7 million of NOL carryforwards could be generated from the 2007 tax year which would expire if unused in the 2027 tax year, however, as discussed above, in connection with the IRS’s 2007 Federal income tax return audit, the IRS is proposing to disallow approximately $16.6 million of the NOL carry forwards generated from the 2007 tax year; this matter is ongoing. Additionally, approximately $2.0 million of NOL carryforwards could be generated from the 2010 tax year which would expire if unused in the 2030 tax year. In the 2010 tax year, approximately $5.3 million of NOL carryforwards originating from the 1995 tax year expired to the extent they remain unused and in the 2009 tax year, approximately $2.2 million of NOL carryforwards originating from the 1994 tax year expired to the extent they remain unused. The unused carryforwards will have expired unless they are utilized in prior tax years or absorbed in an earlier year based on inclusion of certain items in the consolidated group. The utilization of certain carryforwards and carrybacks is subject to limitations under U.S. federal income tax laws. In addition, the Company has approximately $21 million of AMT credit carryforwards (“AMT Credits”), which are not subject to expiration. Based on the filing of the Carryback Claims, as defined further above, the Company would seek to utilize approximately $8 million of the $21 million of AMT Credits.
As a result of the Office of Thrift Supervision’s December 4, 1992 placement of Carteret in receivership, under the management of the Resolution Trust Corporation (“RTC”)/Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”), and then proposed Treasury Reg. §1.597-4(g), the Company had previously filed its 1992 and subsequent federal income tax returns with Carteret disaffiliated from the Company’s consolidated federal income tax return. Based upon the impact of Treasury Reg. §1.597-4(g), which was issued in final form on December 20, 1995, a continuing review of the Company’s tax basis in Carteret, and the impact of prior year tax return adjustments on the Company’s 1992 federal income tax return as filed, the Company decided not to make an election pursuant to final Treasury Reg. §1.597-4(g) to disaffiliate Carteret from the Company’s consolidated federal income tax return effective as of December 4, 1992 (the “Election Decision”).
AMBASE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
The Company has made numerous requests to the RTC/FDIC for tax information pertaining to Carteret and the resulting successor institution, Carteret Federal Savings Bank (“Carteret FSB”); however all of the information still has not been received. The Company believes, as a result of remaining consolidated with Carteret FSB for federal income tax return purposes, that the Company’s tax basis in its investment in Carteret/Carteret FSB can be converted into NOL’s, as tax losses are incurred, which could be available to carryforward/carryback into various federal income tax return years. However; since all of the Carteret FSB tax information has not been received, the Company is unable to determine with certainty, the amount of or the years in which any NOL’s may ultimately be generated; if the NOL carryforwards/carrybacks will be utilized in prior federal income tax return years; or the final expiration dates of any of the NOL carryforwards/carrybacks ultimately generated.
Based on information received to date, and prior to the recognition of the 1992 tax losses reflected on the Company’s 1992 amended federal income tax return, as further described below, the Company estimated that as of December 1992 it had a remaining tax basis related to its investment in Carteret/Carteret FSB of approximately $158 million. Based on the Company’s Election Decision, described above, and the receipt of some of the requested information from the RTC/FDIC, the Company amended its 1992 consolidated federal income tax return to include the federal income tax effects of Carteret and Carteret FSB, (the “1992 Amended Return”). The Company is still in the process of reviewing its consolidated federal income tax returns for 1993 and subsequent years.
The Company expects that the 1992 Amended Return will generate approximately $56 million of NOL’s for tax year 1992, which the Company is seeking to carryback to prior tax years to produce refunds of tax previously paid. The 1992 Amended Return has not yet been accepted by the IRS. See “Carryback Claims,” below for further information. As part of the 1992 Amended Return, approximately $56 million, (of the $158 million), of Carteret/Carteret FSB tax basis is expected to be converted into NOL’s, (as tax losses are incurred) in tax year 1992, and will have expired in the 2007 tax year, unless they are utilized as part of the “Carryback Claims,” or absorbed in earlier years based on inclusion of certain items in the consolidated group.
The Carteret/Carteret FSB tax basis, of approximately $102 million, remaining after recognition of the 1992 Amended Return, may be converted into NOL carryforwards/carrybacks as additional tax losses are incurred by Carteret/Carteret FSB and may be carried back or carried forward to other tax years; may be utilized in other tax years; or could begin to expire no earlier than the 2008 tax year based upon the year any NOL’s are ultimately generated. The Company can give no assurances with regard to the 1992 Amended Return, subsequent year returns, or the final amount or expiration of NOL carryforwards/carrybacks ultimately generated, if any, from the Company’s tax basis in Carteret/Carteret FSB. Any NOL’s ultimately generated from the Company’s tax basis in Carteret/Carteret FSB, would be in addition to the NOL carryforwards/carrybacks generated based on the Company’s federal income tax returns as previously filed, as further detailed above.
In March 2000, the Company filed with the IRS several claims and amendments to previously filed claims with respect to the Carryback Claims, seeking refunds from the IRS of alternative minimum tax and other federal income taxes paid by the Company in prior years, plus applicable IRS interest, based on the filing of the 1992 Amended Return. In February 2005, the IRS formally disallowed the Carryback Claims. On April 29, 2008, the Company filed suit with respect to the Carryback Claims in the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut, seeking federal tax refunds for tax year 1989, plus interest. On September 29, 2009, the U.S. Department of Justice (“DOJ”), representing defendant United States in the suit, filed a Motion to Dismiss. In response, on October 19, 2009, the Company filed its opposition to the Government’s Motion to Dismiss, as well as the Company’s own Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. In June 2010, the Court issued a Memorandum Decision conditionally granting the United States’ Motion to Dismiss the case but allowing the Company to conduct limited discovery to establish whether the Court has jurisdiction. On August 30, 2010, the Company filed a Motion to Set Aside the Court’s Conditional Order of Dismissal. On February 28, 2011, the Court granted the Company’s motion and issued a Memorandum of Decision concluding that the Company had timely filed a refund claim for tax year 1992 seeking to adjust the amount of bad debt deduction and that the case should not be dismissed. In March 2011, the Company filed a Motion for Partial Summary Judgment based on the Court’s ruling that the Company’s refund claims were timely filed. In May 2011, the DOJ filed a Cross Motion for Summary Judgment and an opposition to the Company’s Summary Judgment Motion. In June 2011, the Company filed a Memorandum in Opposition to the Government’s Cross Motion for Summary Judgment and a Reply to the Governments Opposition to the Company’s Summary Judgment Motion, and the Government in June 2011, subsequently filed a response brief. The Court’s rulings to date are not dispositive of the case. The Company can give no assurances as to the final amount of refunds, if any, or when they might be received. See Note 3 – Legal Proceedings for further information.
AMBASE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
The FDIC has previously filed a federal income tax return for Carteret FSB for 1995 (as well as other years), which indicates that Carteret FSB allegedly could owe a 1995 federal income tax liability of $32 million, which including interest and penalty thereon, is alleged to be in excess of $120 million. The FDIC has stated to the United States Court of Federal Claims (“Court of Claims”) that the tax amounts are only estimates and are highly contingent. However, it is possible that the IRS may try to collect the alleged Carteret FSB federal income taxes from the Carteret FSB receivership.
The Company believes the Carteret FSB federal income tax returns filed by the FDIC were improperly filed and are neither accurate nor valid. The FDIC, as indicated above, continues to report the 1995 federal income tax liability, including interest and penalty, as a component of the alleged Carteret FSB receivership deficit. As part of the Supervisory Goodwill legal proceedings, the Company presented to the Court of Claims various arguments to support the position that no federal income tax would be owed as a result of the Carteret FSB receivership operations for tax year 1995; however, the Department of Justice and the FDIC have stated to the Court of Claims that they do not believe the Court of Claims has jurisdiction over that issue. The Supervisory Goodwill proceedings remain pending in the Court of Claims. Based on the information received to date, if the correct Carteret FSB federal income tax results were included with the Company’s originally filed federal income tax returns, the Company based upon consultation with its legal and tax advisors believes that no additional material federal income tax would be owed by the Company, although this cannot be assured because a contrary result is possible, given the uncertainty with various legal and factual assumptions underlying the Company’s beliefs. This assessment included among other items, a review of the Carteret FSB federal income tax returns as prepared by the FDIC and the correction of errors originally reported therein, the proper application of federal NOL carryforwards and carrybacks, and the adherence to statute of limitation provisions contained in the Internal Revenue Code, as amended.
As explained above, although the Company does not believe that Carteret FSB or the Company will have a material federal income tax liability related to Carteret FSB for tax year 1995 (or any other tax year), the Company can give no assurances of the final amounts, if any, of federal income taxes owed by the Carteret FSB receivership or by the Company as a result of the Carteret FSB receivership operations. The Company is continuing to try to resolve these matters as part of the Supervisory Goodwill legal process and is also continuing to review the Carteret FSB federal income tax returns and the results of their inclusion with the Company’s federal income tax returns as previously filed. The Company is pursuing the Carryback Claims, as further described above, which could have an impact on the analysis of the prior year tax information. For further information on the Supervisory Goodwill legal proceedings, see Note 3 herein. The discussion of the Carteret FSB federal income tax results is intended to provide details as to the potential inter-relationship of the Carteret FSB federal income tax returns with the Company’s federal income tax positions. It is not a reflection of any federal income tax liability of the Company arising from the Carteret receivership operations.
Note 8 – Stock-Based Compensation
Under the Company’s 1993 Stock Incentive Plan (the “1993 Plan”), the Company may grant to officers and employees of the Company and its subsidiaries, stock options (“Options”), stock appreciation rights (“SARs”), restricted stock awards (“Restricted Stock”), merit awards (“Merit Awards”) and performance share awards (“Performance Shares”), through May 28, 2018. An aggregate of 5,000,000 shares of the Company’s Common Stock are reserved for issuance under the 1993 Plan (upon the exercise of Options and Stock Appreciation Rights, upon awards of Restricted Stock and Performance Shares); however, of such shares, only 2,500,000 shares in the aggregate shall be available for issuance for Restricted Stock Awards and Merit Awards. Such shares shall be authorized but unissued shares of Common Stock. Options may be granted as incentive stock options (“ISOs”) intended to qualify for favorable tax treatment under Federal tax law or as nonqualified stock options (“NQSOs”). SARs may be granted with respect to any Options granted under the 1993 Plan and may be exercised only when the underlying Option is exercisable. The 1993 Plan requires that the exercise price of all Options and SARs be equal to or greater than the fair market value of the Company’s Common Stock on the date of grant of that Option. The term of any ISO or related SAR cannot exceed ten years from the date of grant, and the term of any NQSO cannot exceed ten years and one month from the date of grant. Subject to the terms of the 1993 Plan and any additional restrictions imposed at the time of grant, Options and any related SARs ordinarily will become exercisable commencing one year after the date of grant. Options granted generally have a ten year contractual life and generally have vesting terms of two years from the date of grant. In the case of a “Change of Control” of the Company (as defined in the 1993 Plan), Options granted pursuant to the 1993 Plan may become fully exercisable as to all optioned shares from and after the date of such Change of Control in the discretion of the Committee or as may otherwise be provided in the grantee’s Option agreement. Death, retirement, or absence for disability will not result in the cancellation of any Options.
AMBASE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
The fair values of option awards were estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes-Merton option valuation model (“Black-Scholes”) that uses certain assumptions at the time of valuation. Expected volatilities are based on historical volatility of the Company’s stock. The Company uses historical data to estimate option exercises and employee terminations within the valuation model. The expected term of options granted is estimated based on the contractual lives of option grants, option vesting period and historical data and represents the period of time that options granted are expected to be outstanding. The risk-free interest rate for periods within the contractual life of the option is based on the U.S. Treasury bond yield in effect at the time of grant.
The Black-Scholes option valuation model requires the input of highly subjective assumptions, including the expected life of the stock-based award and stock price volatility. The assumptions utilized were management’s best estimates, but these estimates involve inherent uncertainties and the application of management’s judgment. As a result, if other assumptions had been used, our recorded stock-based compensation expense could have been materially different from the amounts previously recorded. In addition, the Company is required to estimate the expected forfeiture rate and only recognize expense for those shares expected to vest. If our actual forfeiture rate is materially different from our estimate, the share-based compensation expense could be materially different. The Company believes that the use of the Black-Scholes model meets the fair value measurement objectives of accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and reflects all substantive characteristics of the instruments being valued.
Incentive plan activity during the year-to-date period is summarized as follows:
|
Number of Shares Under Option
|
Weighted Average Exercise Price
|
Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life (in years)
|
Intrinsic Value
|
||||||
|
Outstanding at January 1, 2011
|
836,000
|
$
|
0.87
|
||||||
|
Expired
|
(20,000
|
)
|
0.60
|
||||||
|
Outstanding at June 30, 2011
|
816,000
|
$
|
0.87
|
1.99
|
$
|
-
|
|||
|
Exercisable at June 30, 2011
|
816,000
|
$
|
0.87
|
1.99
|
$
|
-
|
|||
Information relating to the 1993 Plan as of the dates indicated below is as follows:
|
June 30,
2011
|
June 30,
2010
|
|||||||
|
Unamortized compensation cost relating to non-vested stock
options
|
$ | - | $ | - | ||||
|
Stock based compensation expense recorded for the year-to-date
period
|
$ | - | $ | - | ||||
|
Options to purchase shares of common stock which were excluded from computation of diluted earnings per share due to the effect of being anti-dilutive in the computation of earnings per share.
|
816,000 | 836,000 | ||||||
|
Shares available for future stock option grants
|
4,184,000 | |||||||
AMBASE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 9 - Pension and Savings Plans
The Company sponsors the AmBase 401(k) Savings Plan (the “Savings Plan”), which is a “Section 401(k) Plan” within the meaning of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”). The Savings Plan permits eligible employees to make contributions of up to 30% of compensation, which are matched by the Company at a percentage determined annually. Effective July 1, 2010, the employer match was reduced to 33% of the amount the employee elects to defer. Employee contributions to the Savings Plan are invested at the employee’s discretion, in various investment funds. The Company’s matching contributions are invested in the same manner as the compensation reduction contributions. All contributions are subject to maximum limitations contained in the Code. The Company’s matching contributions to the Savings Plan, charged to expense, were as follows
|
June 30, 2011
|
Six Months Ended June 30
|
|||||||||||||||
|
2011
|
2010
|
2011
|
2010
|
|||||||||||||
|
Company matching contributions
|
$ | 4,000 | $ | 6,000 | $ | 16,000 | $ | 41,000 | ||||||||
Note 10 - Common Stock Repurchase Plan
In January 2002, the Company announced a common stock repurchase plan (the “Repurchase Plan”) which allows for the repurchase by the Company of up to 10 million shares of its common stock in the open market.
The Repurchase Plan is conditioned upon favorable business conditions and acceptable prices for the common stock. Purchases under the Repurchase Plan may be made, from time to time, in the open market, through block trades or otherwise. Depending on market conditions and other factors, purchases may be commenced or suspended any time or from time to time without prior notice.
|
Total Number of Shares Purchased
|
Average Price Paid per Share (including Broker Commissions)
|
Total Number Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans
|
Maximum Number Shares that may yet be Purchased under the Plan
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
Beginning balance January 1, 2011
|
-
|
-
|
3,208,109
|
6,791,891
|
||||||||||||||||
|
January 1, 2011 - January 31, 2011
|
-
|
-
|
3,208,109
|
6,791,891
|
||||||||||||||||
|
February 1, 2011 - February 28, 2011
|
-
|
-
|
3,208,109
|
6,791,891
|
||||||||||||||||
|
March 1, 2011 - March 31, 2011
|
-
|
-
|
3,208,109
|
6,791,891
|
||||||||||||||||
|
April 1, 2011 – April 30, 2011
|
-
|
-
|
3,208,109
|
6,791,891
|
||||||||||||||||
|
May 1, 2011 – May 31, 2011
|
-
|
-
|
3,208,109
|
|
6,791,891
|
|||||||||||||||
|
June 1, 2011 – June 30, 2011
|
-
|
-
|
3,208,109
|
6,791,891
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Total
|
-
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Note 11 - Subsequent Events
The Company has performed a review of events subsequent to the balance sheet dated June 30, 2011, through the report issuance date.
AMBASE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS
This quarterly report, together with other statements and information publicly disseminated by the Company, may contain certain “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Act”), and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), or make oral statements that constitute forward-looking statements. The Company intends such forward-looking statements to be covered by the safe harbor provisions for forward-looking statements contained in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Forward-looking statements are inherently subject to risks and uncertainties, many of which cannot be predicted or quantified. The forward-looking statements may relate to such matters as anticipated financial performance, future revenues or earnings, business prospects, projected ventures, anticipated market performance, anticipated litigation results or the timing of pending litigation, and similar matters. When used in this Quarterly Report, the words “estimates,” “expects,” “anticipates,” “believes,” “plans,” “intends” and variations of such words and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. The Company cautions readers that a variety of factors could cause the Company’s actual results to differ materially from the anticipated results or other expectations expressed in the Company’s forward-looking statements. These risks and uncertainties, many of which are beyond the Company’s control, include, but are not limited to those set forth in “Item 1A, Risk Factors” and elsewhere in this report and in the Company’s other public filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, including but not limited to: (i) transaction volume in the securities markets; (ii) the volatility of the securities markets; (iii) fluctuations in interest rates; (iv) risks inherent in the real estate business, including, but not limited to tenant defaults, changes in occupancy rates or real estate values; (v) changes in regulatory requirements which could affect the cost of doing business; (vi) general economic conditions; (vii) changes in the rate of inflation and the related impact on the securities markets; (viii) changes in federal and state tax laws; and (ix) risks arising from unfavorable decisions in our current material litigation matters, or unfavorable decisions in other Supervisory Goodwill cases. These are not the only risks that we face. There may be additional risks that we do not presently know of or that we currently believe are immaterial which could also impair our business and financial position.
Undue reliance should not be placed on these forward-looking statements, which are applicable only as of the date hereof. The Company undertakes no obligation to revise or update these forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances that arise after the date of this quarterly report or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events. Accordingly, there is no assurance that the Company’s expectations will be realized.
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, which follows, should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and related notes, which are contained in Part I - Item 1, herein and the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010.
Item 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
BUSINESS OVERVIEW
AmBase Corporation (the “Company”) is a holding company which, through a wholly-owned subsidiary, owns a commercial office building in Greenwich, Connecticut. The Company previously owned an insurance company and a savings bank.
In February 1991, the Company sold its ownership interest in The Home Insurance Company and its subsidiaries. On December 4, 1992, Carteret Savings Bank, FA (“Carteret”) was placed in receivership by the Office of Thrift Supervision (“OTS”).
The Company’s assets currently consist primarily of cash and cash equivalents, investment securities, and real estate owned. The Company earns non-operating revenue consisting principally of investment earnings on investment securities and cash equivalents. The Company continues to evaluate a number of possible acquisitions and is engaged in the management of its assets and liabilities, including the contingent assets associated with its legal claims, as described in Part I – Item 1. Discussions and negotiations are ongoing with respect to certain of these matters. From time to time, the Company and its subsidiaries may be named as a defendant in various lawsuits or proceedings. The Company intends to aggressively contest all litigation and contingencies, as well as pursue all sources for contributions to settlements.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
The Company’s assets at June 30, 2011, aggregated $10,834,000, consisting principally of cash and cash equivalents of $893,000, investment securities of $7,700,000, and real estate owned of $1,945,000. At June 30, 2011, the Company’s liabilities aggregated $144,000. Total stockholders equity was $10,690,000.
For the six months ended June 30, 2011, cash of $956,000 was used by operations, due to the payment of operating expenses and prior year accruals. The cash needs of the Company for the six months ended June 30, 2011 were satisfied by the Company’s financial resources and to a lesser extent the receipt of investment earnings received on investment securities and cash equivalents. Management believes that the Company’s liquid assets are sufficient to continue operations for the next twelve months.
For the six months ended June 30, 2010, cash of $1,221,000 was used by operations, primarily due to the payment of legal expenses relating to the Supervisory Goodwill proceedings and to a lesser extent the payment of prior year accruals and operating expenses, partially offset by the receipt of interest income and investment earnings. The cash needs of the Company for the six months ended June 30, 2010 were satisfied by the Company’s financial resources and to a lesser extent receipt of investment earnings received on investment securities and cash equivalents.
Real estate owned consists of one commercial office building in Greenwich, Connecticut which the Company owns and manages. The building is approximately 14,500 square feet; approximately 3,500 square feet is utilized by the Company for its executive offices; the remaining space is currently unoccupied and available for lease. Although the portion of the building not being utilized by the Company is currently unoccupied and available for lease, based on the Company’s analysis, including but not limited to current market rents in the area, leasing values, and comparable property sales, the Company believes the property’s fair value exceeds the property’s current carrying value. Therefore, the Company believes the carrying value of the property as of June 30, 2011, has not been impaired.
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities as of June 30, 2011, decreased from December 31, 2010, principally as a result of the payment of prior year accruals.
There are no material commitments for capital expenditures as of June 30, 2011. Inflation has had no material impact on the business and operations of the Company.
The Company continues to evaluate a number of possible acquisitions and is engaged in the management of its assets and liabilities, including the contingent assets associated with its legal claims. Discussions and negotiations are ongoing with respect to certain of these matters. The Company intends to aggressively contest all litigation and contingencies, as well as pursue all sources for contributions to settlements. For a discussion of lawsuits and proceedings, including the Supervisory Goodwill litigation see Part I - Item 1 - Note 3.
Results of Operations for the Second Quarter and Six Months Ended June 30, 2011 vs. the Second Quarter and Six Months Ended June 30, 2010
The Company earns non-operating revenue consisting principally of investment earnings on investment securities and cash equivalents. The Company’s management believes that operating cash needs for the next twelve months will be met principally by the Company’s financial resources and to a lesser extent, the receipt of investment earnings on investment securities and cash equivalents.
Compensation and benefits decreased to $336,000 and $668,000 in the second quarter and six months ended June 30, 2011, compared to $359,000 and $776,000 in the respective 2010 periods. The decrease in the 2011 second quarter and six month periods is due to lower compensation expenses due to reduced staffing levels as well as a lower level of benefit costs in the 2011 periods versus the same 2010 periods.
No stock based compensation expense was recorded in the six months ended June 30, 2011 or June 30, 2010, as all previously granted outstanding options vested as of January 2, 2007. No stock option awards have been granted since January 2005.
Professional and outside services decreased slightly to $84,000 and $137,000 in the second quarter and six months ended June 30, 2011, respectively, compared to $101,000 and $151,000 in the respective 2010 periods. The decrease in the 2011 periods as compared to the 2010 periods is principally the result of a lower level of legal and professional fees principally relating to the Supervisory Goodwill litigation.
Property operating and maintenance expenses were $21,000 and $50,000 for the second quarter and six months ended June 30, 2011, respectively, compared to $37,000 and $69,000 in the respective 2010 periods. The decreased expenses in 2011 compared to the 2010 periods are due to a decrease in the overall level of repairs and maintenance expenses.
Insurance expenses decreased to $11,000 and $19,000 in the second quarter and six months ended June 30, 2011, respectively compared with $17,000 and $24,000 in the respective 2010 periods. The decrease is generally due to a decline in insurance premium costs due to cost containment efforts.
Other operating expenses decreased slightly to $20,000 and $47,000 in the second quarter and six months ended June 30, 2011, respectively, compared with $22,000 and $52,000 in the respective 2010 periods due to overall cost containment efforts.
Interest income in the second quarter and six months ended June 30, 2011, decreased to $2,000 and $5,000, respectively from $4,000 and $9,000 in the respective 2010 periods. The decreased interest income is principally due to a decreased investment yield in 2011, compared with 2010, and a lower level of cash equivalents and investment securities. See Item 3 - Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure about Market Risk for information concerning the Company’s weighted average interest rate yield on investment securities as of June 30, 2011.
Other income of $105,000 for the second quarter and six months ended June 30, 2011, is attributable to recovery of funds by the Company in May 2011, from items previously written off.
The Company recognized income tax provisions of $15,000 and $30,000 for the second quarter and six months ended June 30, 2011, respectively, as compared with income tax provisions of $11,000 and $22,000 for the second quarter and six months ended June 30, 2010, respectively. The income tax provisions for the 2011 and 2010 periods are primarily attributable to a provision for a minimum tax on capital imposed by the state of Connecticut. Income taxes applicable to operating income (loss) are generally determined by applying the estimated effective annual income tax rates to pretax income (loss) for the year-to-date interim period. Income taxes applicable to unusual or infrequently occurring items are provided in the period in which such items occur.
TABULAR DISCLOSURE OF CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS
|
(in thousands)
|
Payments Due by Period
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
Total
|
Less Than One Year
|
One to Three Years
|
Three to Five Years
|
More than Five Years
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Operating leases
|
$ | 15 | $ | 3 | $ | 12 | $ | - | $ | - | ||||||||||
|
Total
|
$ | 15 | $ | 3 | $ | 12 | $ | - | $ | - | ||||||||||
Item 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
The Company holds short-term investments as a source of liquidity. The Company’s interest rate sensitive investments with maturity dates of less than one year consist of the following:
|
($ in thousands)
|
June 30, 2011
|
December 31, 2010
|
||||||||||||||
|
Carrying Value
|
Fair Value
|
Carrying Value
|
Fair Value
|
|||||||||||||
|
U.S. Treasury Bills
|
$ | 7,700 | $ | 7,700 | $ | 8,200 | $ | 8,199 | ||||||||
|
Weighted average interest rate
|
0.60 | % | 0.09 | % | ||||||||||||
The Company’s current policy is to minimize the interest rate risk of its short-term investments by investing in U.S. Treasury Bills with maturities of less than one year. There were no significant changes in market exposures or the manner in which interest rate risk is managed during the year.
Due to current market factors, the Company has maintained its available cash resources in U.S. Treasury Bills, which are currently providing a low investment yield.
Item 4T. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Our disclosure controls and procedures include our controls and other procedures to ensure that information required to be disclosed in this and other reports under the Exchange Act of 1934 is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure and to ensure that such information is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods.
Our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have conducted an evaluation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of June 30, 2011. Based upon this evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) promulgated under the Exchange Act) are effective to ensure that the information required to be disclosed by us in the reports we file under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported with adequate timeliness.
There have been no changes during the most recent fiscal quarter in our internal control over financial reporting, as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) of the Exchange Act, that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
STOCKHOLDER INQUIRIES
Stockholder inquiries, including requests for the following: (i) change of address; (ii) replacement of lost stock certificates; (iii) Common Stock name registration changes; (iv) Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q; (v) Annual Reports on Form 10-K; (vi) proxy material; and (vii) information regarding stock holdings, should be directed to:
American Stock Transfer and Trust Company
59 Maiden Lane
New York, NY 10038
Attention: Shareholder Services
(800) 937-5449 or (718) 921-8200 Ext. 6820
As the Company does not maintain a website, copies of Quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, Annual Reports on Form 10-K and Proxy Statements can also be obtained directly from the Company free of charge by sending a request to the Company by mail as follows:
AmBase Corporation
100 Putnam Green, 3rd Floor
Greenwich, CT 06830
Attn: Shareholder Services
The Company is subject to the informational requirements of the Exchange Act. Accordingly, the Company’s public reports, including Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Annual Reports on Form 10-K and Proxy Statements, can be obtained through the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) EDGAR Database available on the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov. Materials filed with the SEC may also be read or copied by visiting the SEC’s Public Reference Room, 100 F Street, NE, Washington, DC 20549. Information on the operation of the Public Reference Room may be obtained by calling 1-800-SEC-0330.
PART II - OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
For a discussion of the Company’s legal proceedings, including a discussion of the Company’s Supervisory Goodwill litigation, see Part I - Item 1 - Note 3 - Legal Proceedings.
Item 1A. RISK FACTORS
There have been no material changes from risk factors previously disclosed in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 in response to Item 1A to Part I of Form 10-K.
Item 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS
None.
Item 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES
None.
Item 5. OTHER INFORMATION
None.
Item 6. EXHIBITS
Exhibit 31.1 Rule 13a-14(a) Certification of Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 31.2 Rule 13a-14(a) Certification of Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.1 Section 1350 Certification of Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 32.2 Section 1350 Certification of Chief Financial Officer
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
AMBASE CORPORATION
/s/ John P. Ferrara
By JOHN P. FERRARA
Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Controller
(Duly Authorized Officer and Principal Financial and
Accounting Officer)
Date: August 9, 2011