WILSON BANK HOLDING CO - FORM 10-Q

Attached files

file	filename
EXCEL - IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT - WILSON BANK HOLDING CO	Financial_Report.xls
EX-31.1 - EX-31.1 SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION OF THE CEO - WILSON BANK HOLDING CO	c20298exv31w1.htm
EX-32.2 - EX-32.2 SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION OF THE CFO - WILSON BANK HOLDING CO	c20298exv32w2.htm
EX-32.1 - EX-32.1 SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION OF THE CEO - WILSON BANK HOLDING CO	c20298exv32w1.htm
EX-31.2 - EX-31.2 SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION OF THE CFO - WILSON BANK HOLDING CO	c20298exv31w2.htm

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)


þ		QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2011


o		TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from to

Commission File Number 0-20402

WILSON BANK HOLDING COMPANY

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)


Tennessee		62-1497076

(State or other jurisdiction of		(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
incorporation or organization)

623 West Main Street, Lebanon, TN		37087

(Address of principal executive offices)		Zip Code

(615) 444-2265

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Not Applicable

(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes þ No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.


Large accelerated filer o	Accelerated filer þ	Non-accelerated filer o	Smaller reporting company o
		(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). YES o NO þ

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.

Common stock outstanding: 7,306,324 shares at August 8, 2011


*Part I: FINANCIAL INFORMATION*

Item 1. Financial Statements				3

The unaudited consolidated financial statements of the Company and its subsidiaries are as follows:

Consolidated Balance Sheets — June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010				3

Consolidated Statements of Earnings — For the three months and six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010				4

Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Earnings — For the three months and six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010				5

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows — For the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010				6

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations				25

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk				37

Disclosures required by Item 3 are incorporated by reference to Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operation

Item 4. Controls and Procedures				38

*Part II: OTHER INFORMATION*

Item 1. Legal Proceedings				39

Item 1A. Risk Factors				39

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds				39

Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities				39

Item 4. (Removed and Reserved)				39

Item 5. Other Information				39

Item 6. Exhibits				40

Signatures				41

EX-31.1 SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION OF THE CEO
EX-31.2 SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION OF THE CFO
EX-32.1 SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION OF THE CEO
EX-32.2 SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION OF THE CFO
EX-101 INSTANCE DOCUMENT
EX-101 SCHEMA DOCUMENT
EX-101 CALCULATION LINKBASE DOCUMENT
EX-101 LABELS LINKBASE DOCUMENT
EX-101 PRESENTATION LINKBASE DOCUMENT

Part I. Financial Information


Item 1.		Financial Statements

WILSON BANK HOLDING COMPANY

Consolidated Balance Sheets
June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010

(Unaudited)


	June 30,			December 31,
	2011			2010
	(Dollars in Thousands
	Except Per Share Amounts)

Assets
Loans	$	1,121,067		$	1,095,268
Less: Allowance for loan losses		(23,429	)		(22,177	)

Net loans		1,097,638			1,073,091

Securities:
Held to maturity, at cost (market value $15,227 and $13,690, respectively)		14,738			13,396
Available-for-sale, at market (amortized cost $245,350 and $282,453, respectively)		244,804			277,032

Total securities		259,542			290,428


Loans held for sale		6,407			7,845
Restricted equity securities		3,012			3,012
Federal funds sold		26,730			3,225

Total earning assets		1,393,329			1,377,601

Cash and due from banks		37,536			35,057
Bank premises and equipment, net		32,918			31,941
Accrued interest receivable		6,007			6,252
Deferred income tax asset		7,811			9,629
Other real estate		14,175			13,741
Other assets		8,082			8,572
Goodwill		4,805			4,805
Other intangible assets, net		310			508


Total assets	$	1,504,973		$	1,488,106


Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity
Deposits	$	1,339,267		$	1,331,282
Securities sold under repurchase agreements		6,302			6,536
Accrued interest and other liabilities		7,524			5,955

Total liabilities		1,353,093			1,343,773


Shareholders’ equity:
Common stock, $2.00 par value; authorized 15,000,000 shares, issued 7,267,067 and 7,225,088 shares, respectively		14,534			14,450
Additional paid-in capital		45,321			43,790
Retained earnings		92,362			89,439

Net unrealized losses on available-for-sale securities, net of income taxes of $209 and $2,075, respectively		(337	)		(3,346	)

Total shareholders’ equity		151,880			144,333

Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity	$	1,504,973		$	1,488,106

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements (unaudited).

WILSON BANK HOLDING COMPANY

Consolidated Statements of Earnings
Three Months and Six Months Ended June 30, 2011 and 2010

(Unaudited)


	Three Months Ended					Six Months Ended
	June 30,					June 30,
	2011		2010			2011		2010
	(Dollars in Thousands
	Except per Share Amounts)
Interest income:
Interest and fees on loans	$	16,585	$	17,056		$	32,824	$	33,891
Interest and dividends on securities:
Taxable securities		1,385		2,385			2,846		4,577
Exempt from Federal income taxes		104		115			214		234
Interest on loans held for sale		51		50			105		80
Interest on Federal funds sold		27		23			42		41
Interest and dividends on restricted securities		29		40			65		62

Total interest income		18,181		19,669			36,096		38,885


Interest expense:
Interest on negotiable order of withdrawal accounts		556		697			1,107		1,327
Interest on money market and savings accounts		736		834			1,426		1,675
Interest on certificates of deposit		3,151		4,739			6,593		9,969
Interest on securities sold under repurchase agreements		13		17			27		40
Interest on Federal Home Loan Bank advances		—		1			—		1
Interest on Federal funds purchased		—		—			2		—

Total interest expense		4,456		6,288			9,155		13,012


Net interest income before provision for loan losses		13,725		13,381			26,941		25,873
Provision for loan losses		2,618		6,073			4,587		8,179

Net interest income after provision for loan losses		11,107		7,308			22,354		17,694


Non-interest income:
Service charges on deposit accounts		1,330		1,374			2,618		2,666
Other fees and commissions		1,811		1,562			3,451		2,935
Gain on sale of loans		418		402			718		721
Gain on sale of securities		—		211			—		261

Total non-interest income		3,559		3,549			6,787		6,583


Non-interest expense:
Salaries and employee benefits		5,649		3,814			10,981		8,865
Occupancy expenses, net		619		608			1,191		1,180
Furniture and equipment expense		281		359			528		725
Data processing expense		369		286			683		603
Directors’ fees		173		171			373		381
Other operating expenses		2,842		2,779			6,066		5,347
Loss on sale of other real estate		449		158			1,000		262
(Gain) loss on sale of other assets		1		(1	)		6		8

Total non-interest expense		10,383		8,174			20,828		17,371


Earnings before income taxes		4,283		2,683			8,313		6,906
Income taxes		1,668		1,028			3,222		2,666

Net earnings		2,615		1,655			5,091		4,240


Weighted average number of shares outstanding-basic		7,268,537		7,185,208			7,263,342		7,178,453

Weighted average number of shares outstanding-diluted		7,276,085		7,193,199			7,270,286		7,185,482


Basic earnings per common share	$	.36	$	.23		$	.70	$	.59

Diluted earnings per common share	$	.36	$	.23		$	.70	$	.59


Dividends per share	$	—	$	—		$	.30	$	.30

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements (unaudited).

WILSON BANK HOLDING COMPANY

Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Earnings

Three Months and Six Months Ended June 30, 2011 and 2010

(Unaudited)


	Three Months Ended					Six Months Ended
	June 30,					June 30,
	2011		2010			2011		2010
	(In Thousands)

Net earnings	$	2,615	$	1,655		$	5,091	$	4,240


Other comprehensive earnings, net of tax:
Unrealized gains on available-for-sale securities arising during period, net of taxes of $990, $149, $1,866 and $340, respectively		1,596		240			3,009		546

Reclassification adjustment for net gains included in net earnings, net of taxes of $0, $81, $0, and $100, respectively		—		(130	)		—		(161	)

Other comprehensive earnings		1,596		110			3,009		385


Comprehensive earnings	$	4,211	$	1,765		$	8,100	$	4,625

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements (unaudited).

WILSON BANK HOLDING COMPANY

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
Six Months Ended June 30, 2011 and 2010

Increase (Decrease) in Cash and Cash Equivalents
(Unaudited)


	2011			2010
	(In Thousands)
Cash flows from operating activities:
Interest received	$	37,228		$	40,779
Fees and commissions received		6,069			5,601
Proceeds from sale of loans held for sale		40,071			42,540
Origination of loans held for sale		(37,915	)		(45,864	)
Interest paid		(10,285	)		(13,751	)
Cash paid to suppliers and employees		(15,672	)		(13,962	)
Income taxes paid		(3,348	)		(5,271	)

Net cash provided by operating activities		16,148			10,072


Cash flows from investing activities:
Proceeds from maturities, calls, and principal payments of held-to- maturity securities		1,515			1,112
Proceeds from maturities, calls, and principal payments of available-for-sale securities		74,866			228,157
Purchase of held-to-maturity securities		(2,891	)		(2,595	)
Purchase of available-for-sale securities		(38,616	)		(281,778	)
Loans made to customers, net of repayments		(33,400	)		4,061
Purchase of premises and equipment		(1,661	)		(967	)
Proceeds from sale of other real estate		2,785			1,540
Proceeds from sale of other assets		52			83


Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities		2,650			(50,387	)


Cash flows from financing activities:
Net increase in non-interest bearing, savings and NOW deposit accounts		1,186			59,669
Net increase (decrease) in time deposits		6,799			(1,604	)
Decrease in securities sold under repurchase agreements		(234	)		(870	)
Net decrease in advances from Federal Home Loan Bank		—			(11	)
Dividends paid		(2,168	)		(2,144	)
Proceeds from sale of common stock		1,626			1,529
Proceeds from exercise of stock options		71			67
Repurchase of common stock		(94	)		(225	)

Net cash provided by financing activities		7,186			56,411


Net increase in cash and cash equivalents		25,984			16,096

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period		38,282			31,512


Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	64,266		$	47,608

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements (unaudited).

WILSON BANK HOLDING COMPANY
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, Continued
Six Months Ended June 30, 2011 and 2010
Increase in Cash and Cash Equivalents
(Unaudited)


	2011			2010
	(In Thousands)

Reconciliation of net earnings to net cash provided by operating activities:
Net earnings	$	5,091		$	4,240
Adjustments to reconcile net earnings to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation, amortization, and accretion		1,769			1,891
Provision for loan losses		4,587			8,179
Stock option compensation		12			10
Loss on sale of other real estate		1,000			262
Loss on sale of other assets		6			8
Security gains		—			(261	)
Decrease (increase) in loans held for sale		1,438			(4,045	)
Decrease in interest receivable		245			1,074
Increase in deferred tax assets		(48	)		(278	)
Decrease (increase) in other assets, net		315			(888	)
Decrease in taxes payable		(78	)		(2,327	)
Increase in other liabilities		2,941			2,946
Decrease in interest payable		(1,130	)		(739	)

Total adjustments		11,057			5,832


Net cash provided by operating activities	$	16,148		$	10,072


Supplemental schedule of non-cash activities:

Unrealized gain in values of securities available-for-sale, net of taxes of $990 and $240, for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively	$	3,009		$	385


Non-cash transfers from loans to other real estate	$	8,191		$	9,572


Non-cash transfers from other real estate to loans	$	3,972		$	404


Non-cash transfers from loans to other assets	$	47		$	94

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements (unaudited).

WILSON BANK HOLDING COMPANY
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)

Note 1. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Nature of Business — Wilson Bank Holding Company (the “Company”) is a bank holding company whose primary business is conducted by its wholly-owned subsidiary, Wilson Bank & Trust (the “Bank”). The Bank is a commercial bank headquartered in Lebanon, Tennessee. The Bank provides a full range of banking services in its primary market areas of Wilson, Davidson, Rutherford, Trousdale, Sumner, Dekalb, and Smith Counties, Tennessee.

Basis of Presentation — The accompanying unaudited, consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with instructions to Form 10-Q and therefore do not include all information and footnotes necessary for a fair presentation of financial position, results of operations, and cash flows in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. All adjustments consisting of normally recurring accruals that, in the opinion of management, are necessary for a fair presentation of the financial position and results of operations for the periods covered by the report have been included. The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the Company’s consolidated financial statements and related notes appearing in the 2010 Annual Report previously filed on Form 10-K.

These consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly-owned subsidiary. Significant intercompany transactions and accounts are eliminated in consolidation.

Use of Estimates — The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities as of the balance sheet date and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Material estimates that are particularly susceptible to significant change in the near term include the determination of the allowance for loan losses, the valuation of deferred tax assets, determination of any impairment of intangibles, other-than-temporary impairment of securities, the valuation of other real estate, and the fair value of financial instruments.

Loans — Loans are reported at their outstanding principal balances less unearned income, the allowance for loan losses and any deferred fees or costs on originated loans. Interest income on loans is accrued based on the principal balance outstanding. Loan origination fees, net of certain loan origination costs, are deferred and recognized as an adjustment to the related loan yield using a method which approximates the interest method.

Loans are charged off when management believes that the full collectability of the loan is unlikely. As such, a loan may be partially charged-off after a “confirming event” has occurred which serves to validate that full repayment pursuant to the terms of the loan is unlikely.

Loans are placed on nonaccrual status when there is a significant deterioration in the financial condition of the borrower, which often is determined when the principal or interest is more than 90 days past due, unless the loan is both well-secured and in the process of collection. Generally, all interest accrued but not collected for loans that are placed on nonaccrual status, is reversed against current income. Interest income is subsequently recognized only to the extent cash payments are received while the loan is classified as nonaccrual, but interest income recognition is reviewed on a case-by-case basis. A nonaccrual loan is returned to accruing status once the loan has been brought current and collection is reasonably assured or the loan has been “well-secured” through other techniques. Past due status is determined based on the contractual due date per the underlying loan agreement.

All loans that are placed on nonaccrual are further analyzed to determine if they should be classified as impaired loans. At December 31, 2010 and at June 30, 2011, there were no loans classified as nonaccrual that were not also deemed to be impaired. A loan is considered to be impaired when it is probable the Company will be unable to collect all principal and interest payments due in accordance with the contractual terms of the loan. This determination is made using a variety of techniques, which include a review of the borrower’s financial condition, debt-service coverage ratios, global cash flow analysis, guarantor support, other loan file information, meetings with borrowers, inspection or reappraisal of collateral and/or consultation with legal counsel as well as results of reviews of other similar industry credits (e.g. builder loans, development loans, church loans, etc). Generally, loans with an identified weakness and principal balance of $100,000 or more are subject to individual identification for impairment. Individually identified impaired loans are measured based on the present value of expected payments using the loan’s original effective rate as the discount rate, the loan’s observable market price, or the fair value of the collateral if the loan is collateral dependent. If the recorded investment in the impaired loan exceeds the measure of fair value, a specific valuation allowance is established as a component of the allowance for loan losses or, in the case of collateral dependent loans, the excess is charged off. Changes to the valuation allowance are recorded as a component of the provision for loan losses. Any subsequent adjustments to present value calculations for impaired loan valuations as a result of the passage of time, such as changes in the anticipated payback period for repayment, are recorded as a component of the provision for loan losses. For loans less than $100,000, the Company assigns a valuation allowance to these loans utilizing an allocation rate equal to the allocation rate calculated for loans of a similar type greater than $100,000.

Allowance for Loan Losses —The allowance for loan losses is maintained at a level that management believes to be adequate to absorb probable losses in the loan portfolio. Loan losses are charged against the allowance when they are known. Subsequent recoveries are credited to the allowance. Management’s determination of the adequacy of the allowance is based on an evaluation of the portfolio, current economic conditions, volume, growth, composition of the loan portfolio, homogeneous pools of loans, risk ratings of specific loans, historical loan loss factors, loss experience of various loan segments, identified impaired loans and other factors related to the portfolio. This evaluation is performed quarterly and is inherently subjective, as it requires material estimates that are susceptible to significant change including the amounts and timing of future cash flows expected to be received on any impaired loans.

In assessing the adequacy of the allowance, we also consider the results of our ongoing independent loan review process. We undertake this process both to ascertain whether there are loans in the portfolio whose credit quality has weakened over time and to assist in our overall evaluation of the risk characteristics of the entire loan portfolio. Our loan review process includes the judgment of management, independent loan reviewers, and reviews that may have been conducted by third-party reviewers. We incorporate relevant loan review results in the loan impairment determination. In addition, regulatory agencies, as an integral part of their examination process, will periodically review the Company’s allowance for loan losses, and may require the Company to record adjustments to the allowance based on their judgment about information available to them at the time of their examinations.

Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements

In April 2011, FASB issued ASU No. 2011-02 A Creditor’s Determination of Whether a Restructuring Is a Troubled Debt Restructuring, intended to provide additional guidance to assist creditors in determining whether a restructuring of a receivable meets the criteria to be considered a troubled debt restructuring. The amendments in this ASU are effective for the first interim or annual period beginning on or after June 15, 2011, and are to be applied retrospectively to the beginning of the annual period of adoption. As a result of applying these amendments, an entity may identify receivables that are newly considered troubled debt restructurings. The Company is continuing to evaluate the impact of adoption of this ASU.

Note 2. Loans and Allowance for Loan Losses

For financial reporting purposes, the Company classifies its loan portfolio based on the underlying collateral utilized to secure each loan. This classification is consistent with those utilized in the Quarterly Report of Condition and Income filed with the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”).

The following schedule details the loans of the Company at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010:


	(In Thousands)
	June 30,			December 31,
	2011			2010

Mortgage Loans on real estate
Residential 1-4 family	$	351,294			351,237
Multifamily		9,251			8,711
Commercial		392,483			347,381
Construction and land developement		178,643			176,842
Farmland		35,991			38,369
Second mortgages		14,467			15,373
Equity lines of credit		36,283			36,861


Total mortgage loans on real estate		1,018,412			974,774


Commercial loans		48,088			57,249


Agricultural loans		2,819			3,017


Consumer installment loans
Personal		44,527			52,574
Credit cards		3,060			3,160

Total consumer installment loans		47,587			55,734


Other loans		6,005			5,841

		1,122,911			1,096,615


Net deferred loan fees		(1,844	)		(1,347	)


Total loans		1,121,067			1,095,268


Less: Allowance for loan losses		(23,429	)		(22,177	)


Net Loans	$	1,097,638		$	1,073,091

The adequacy of the allowance for loan losses is assessed at the end of each calendar quarter. The level of the allowance is based upon evaluation of the loan portfolio, past loan loss experience, current asset quality trends, known and inherent risks in the portfolio, adverse situations that may affect the borrowers’ ability to repay (including the timing of future payment), the estimated value of any underlying collateral, composition of the loan portfolio, economic conditions, historical loss experience, industry and peer bank loan quality indications and other pertinent factors, including regulatory recommendations.

Transactions in the allowance for loan losses for the quarter ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 are summarized as follows:


	In Thousands
	Residential					Commercial									Second			Equity Lines									Installment
	1-4 Family			Multifamily		Real Estate			Construction			Farmland			Mortgages			of Credit			Commercial			Agricultural			and Other			Total

June 30, 2011

Allowance for loan losses:

Beginning balance	$	5,140			46		7,285			5,558			988			276			767			1,163			67			887			22,177
Provision		1,063			5		1,076			1,787			450			44			(54	)		443			(23	)		(203	)		4,588
Charge-offs		(810	)		—		(1,195	)		(961	)		—			(75	)		(87	)		(250	)		(1	)		(241	)		(3,620	)
Recoveries		52			—		8			41			—			7			16			11			—			149			284

Ending balance	$	5,445			51		7,174			6,425			1,438			252			642			1,367			43			592			23,429


Ending balance individually evaluated for impairment	$	1,131			—		2,778			2,512			850			9			—			864			—			—			8,144


Ending balance collectively evaluated for impairment	$	4,314			51		4,396			3,913			588			243			642			503			43			592			15,285


Ending balance loans acquired with deteriorated credit quality	$	—			—		—			—			—			—			—			—			—			—			—


Loans:

Ending balance	$	351,294			9,251		392,483			178,643			35,991			14,467			36,283			48,088			2,819			53,592			1,122,911


Ending balance individually evaluated for impairment	$	11,204			414		19,759			20,193			4,782			766			—			864			—			—			57,982


Ending balance collectively evaluated for impairment	$	340,090			8,837		372,724			158,450			31,209			13,701			36,283			47,224			2,819			53,592			1,064,929


Ending balance loans acquired with deteriorated credit quality	$	—			—		—			—			—			—			—			—			—			—			—


June 2010

Allowance for loan losses:

Beginning balance	$	4,268			25		4,499			3,412			151			521			788			1,625			38			1,320			16,647
Provision		2,224			20		1,407			1,780			2,072			115			599			(305	)		(6	)		273			8,179
Charge-offs		(585	)		—		(10	)		(763	)		(700	)		(164	)		(621	)		(177	)		—			(443	)		(3,463	)
Recoveries		18			—		—			—			—			2			—			5			2			97			124

Ending balance	$	5,925			45		5,896			4,429			1,523			474			766			1,148			34			1,247			21,487


Ending balance individually evaluated for impairment	$	2,922			—		2,179			2,928			402			91			157			440			—			—			9,119


Ending balance collectively evaluated for impairment	$	3,003		$	45	$	3,717		$	1,501		$	1,121		$	383		$	609		$	708		$	34		$	1,247			12,368


Ending balance loans acquired with deteriorated credit quality	$	—			—		—			—			—			—			—			—			—			—			—


Loans:

Ending balance	$	359,997			8,734		325,262			182,874			43,024			16,386			37,045			58,397			3,241			65,041			1,100,001


Ending balance individually evaluated for impairment	$	11,032			—		20,344			12,382			3,092			192			302			475			—			—			47,819


Ending balance collectively evaluated for impairment	$	348,965			8,734		304,918			170,492			39,932			16,194			36,743			57,922			3,241			65,041			1,052,182


Ending balance loans acquired with deteriorated credit quality	$	—			—		—			—			—			—			—			—			—			—			—

At June 30, 2011, the Company had certain impaired loans of $18,904,000 which were on non accruing interest status. At December 31, 2010, the Company had certain impaired loans of $22,161,000 which were on non accruing interest status. In each case, at the date such loans were placed on nonaccrual status, the Company reversed all previously accrued interest income against current year earnings. The following table presents the Company’s impaired loans at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010.


	In Thousands
			Unpaid				Average		Interest
	Recorded		Principal		Related		Recorded		Income
	Investment		Balance		Allowance		Investment		Recognized

June 30, 2011

With no related allowance recorded:
Residential 1-4 family	$	3,360		3,360		—		3,141		79
Multifamily		414		414		—		414		11
Commercial real estate		4,069		4,069		—		2,858		68
Construction		5,450		5,450		—		6,992		106
Farmland		1,571		1,571		—		2,109		14
Second mortgages		606		606		—		606		—
Equity lines of credit		—		—		—		101		—
Commercial		—		—		—		101		—
Agricultural		—		—		—		—		—

	$	15,470		15,470		—		16,322		278


With allowance recorded:
Residential 1-4 family	$	7,844		7,844		1,131		8,461		154
Multifamily		—		—		—		—		—
Commercial real estate		15,690		15,690		2,778		15,070		324
Construction		14,743		14,743		2,512		14,932		162
Farmland		3,211		3,211		850		2,629		37
Second mortgages		160		160		9		161		—
Equity lines of credit		—		—		—		435		—
Commercial		864		864		864		887		18
Agricultural		—		—		—		78		—

	$	42,512		42,512		8,144		42,653		695


Total
Residential 1-4 family		11,204		11,204		1,131		11,602		233
Multifamily		414		414		—		414		11
Commercial real estate		19,759		19,759		2,778		17,928		392
Construction		20,193		20,193		2,512		21,924		268
Farmland		4,782		4,782		850		4,738		51
Second mortgages		766		766		9		767		—
Equity lines of credit		—		—		—		536		—
Commercial		864		864		864		988		18
Agricultural		—		—		—		78		—

	$	57,982		57,982		8,144		58,975		973


	In Thousands
			Unpaid				Average		Interest
	Recorded		Principal		Related		Recorded		Income
	Investment		Balance		Allowance		Investment		Recognized

December 31, 2010

With no related allowance recorded:
Residential 1-4 family	$	3,811		3,811		—		5,876		472
Multifamily		406		406		—		464		26
Commercial real estate		3,760		4,260		—		4,780		136
Construction		10,522		10,844		—		6,950		256
Farmland		—		—		—		1,790		—
Second mortgages		706		706		—		644		1
Equity lines of credit		—		—		—		601		—
Commercial		204		204		—		689		11
Agricultural		—		—		—		39		—

	$	19,409		20,231		—		21,833		902


With allowance recorded:
Residential 1-4 family	$	7,818		7,890		1,275		9,890		351
Multifamily		—		—		—		—		—
Commercial real estate		18,686		18,686		3,816		15,027		347
Construction		8,546		8,914		1,782		8,426		392
Farmland		1,866		1,866		231		3,848		68
Second mortgages		164		164		15		337		—
Equity lines of credit		869		869		159		418		32
Commercial		910		910		670		569		25
Agricultural		155		155		25		39		10

	$	39,014		39,454		7,973		38,554		1,225


Total
Residential 1-4 family		11,629		11,701		1,275		15,766		823
Multifamily		406		406		—		464		26
Commercial real estate		22,446		22,946		3,816		19,807		483
Construction		19,068		19,758		1,782		15,376		648
Farmland		1,866		1,866		231		5,638		68
Second mortgages		870		870		15		981		1

Equity lines of credit		869		869		159		1,019		32
Commercial		1,114		1,114		670		1,258		36
Agricultural		155		155		25		78		10

	$	58,423		59,685		7,973		60,387		2,127

Impaired loans also include loans that the Company may elect to formally restructure due to the weakening credit status of a borrower such that the restructuring may facilitate a repayment plan that minimizes the potential losses that the Company may have to otherwise incur. These loans are classified as impaired loans and, if on non accruing status as of the date of restructuring, the loans are included in the nonperforming loan balances noted above. Not included in nonperforming loans are loans that have been restructured that were performing as of the restructure date. At June 30, 2011, there were $7.2 million of accruing restructured loans that remain in a performing status. At December 31, 2010, there were $8.8 million of accruing restructured loans.

Potential problem loans, which include nonperforming assets, amounted to approximately $66.1 million at June 30, 2011 compared to $63.2 million at December 31, 2010. Potential problem loans represent those loans with a well defined weakness and where information about possible credit problems of borrowers has caused management to have serious doubts about the borrower’s ability to comply with present repayment terms. This definition is believed to be substantially consistent with the standards established by the FDIC, the Company’s primary regulator, for loans classified as special mention, substandard, or doubtful, excluding the impact of nonperforming loans.

The following table presents our loan balances by primary loan classification and the amount classified within each risk rating category. Pass rated loans include all credits other than those included in special mention, substandard and doubtful which are defined as follows:

	•		Special Mention loans have potential weaknesses that deserve management’s close attention. If left uncorrected, these potential weaknesses may result in deterioration of the repayment prospects for the asset or in the Company’s credit position at some future date.

	•		Substandard loans are inadequately protected by the current sound worth and paying capacity of the obligor or of the collateral pledged, if any. Assets so classified must have a well-defined weakness or weaknesses that jeopardize liquidation of the debt. Substandard loans are characterized by the distinct possibility that the Company will sustain some loss if the deficiencies are not corrected.

	•		Doubtful loans have all the characteristics of substandard loans with the added characteristic that the weaknesses make collection or liquidation in full, on the basis of currently existing facts, conditions and values, highly questionable and improbable. The Company considers all doubtful loans to be impaired and places the loan on nonaccrual status.


	In Thousands
	Residential				Commercial						Second		Equity Lines						Installment
	1-4 Family		Multifamily		Real Estate		Construction		Farmland		Mortgages		of Credit		Commercial		Agricultural		and Other		Total

Credit Risk Profile by Internally Assigned Grade

June 30, 2011

Pass	$	334,361	$	8,755	$	372,484	$	158,187	$	31,027	$	13,001	$	35,978	$	47,131	$	2,795	$	53,064		1,056,783
Special mention		9,299		—		9,091		3,612		1,638		423		126		42		—		177		24,408
Substandard		7,634		496		10,908		16,844		3,326		1,043		179		915		24		351		41,720
Doubtful		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—

Total	$	351,294		9,251		392,483		178,643		35,991		14,467		36,283		48,088		2,819		53,592		1,122,911


December 31, 2010

Pass	$	333,971		8,226		324,880		160,457		36,333		13,838		35,834		56,053		2,852		61,005		1,033,449
Special mention		9,567		—		5,873		726		340		588		276		50		155		166		17,741
Substandard		7,699		485		16,628		15,659		1,696		947		751		1,146		10		404		45,425
Doubtful		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—

Total	$	351,237		8,711		347,381		176,842		38,369		15,373		36,861		57,249		3,017		61,575		1,096,615

Note 3. Debt and Equity Securities

Debt and equity securities have been classified in the consolidated balance sheet according to management’s intent. Debt and equity securities at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 are summarized as follows:


	June 30, 2011
	Securities Available-For-Sale
	In Thousands
			Gross		Gross		Estimated
	Amortized		Unrealized		Unrealized		Market
	Cost		Gains		Losses		Value
U.S. Government and Federal agencies	$	2,001	$	4	$	—	$	2,005
U.S. Government-sponsored enterprises (GSEs)*		127,277		168		887		126,558
Mortgage-backed:
GSE residential		114,550		580		472		114,658
Obligations of states and political
Subdivisions		1,522		61		—	$	1,583

	$	245,350	$	813	$	1,359	$	244,804


			June 30, 2011
	Securities Held-To-Maturity
	In Thousands
			Gross		Gross		Estimated
	Amortized		Unrealized		Unrealized		Market
	Cost		Gains		Losses		Value
Mortgage-backed:
GSE residential	$	2,611	$	70	$	—	$	2,681
Obligations of states and political
Subdivisions		12,127		434		15		12,546

	$	14,738	$	504	$	15	$	15,227


*		Such as Federal National Mortgage Association, Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation, Federal Home Loan Banks, Federal Farm Credit Banks, and Government National Mortgage Association.


	December 31, 2010
	Securities Available-For-Sale
	In Thousands
			Gross		Gross		Estimated
	Amortized		Unrealized		Unrealized		Market
	Cost		Gains		Losses		Value
U.S. Government and Federal Agencies	$	2,004	$	8	$	—	$	2,012
U.S. Government-sponsored enterprises (GSEs)*		157,089		235		2,646		154,678
Mortgage-backed:
GSE residential		121,838		31		3,069		118,800
Obligations of states and political subdivisions		1,522		27		7		1,542


	$	282,453	$	301	$	5,722	$	277,032


	December 31, 2010
	Securities Held-To-Maturity
	In Thousands
			Gross		Gross		Estimated
	Amortized		Unrealized		Unrealized		Market
	Cost		Gains		Losses		Value
Mortgage-backed:
GSE residential	$	1,637	$	19	$	6	$	1,650
Obligations of states and political subdivisions		11,759		369		88		12,040

	$	13,396	$	388	$	94	$	13,690


*		Such as Federal National Mortgage Association, Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation, Federal Home Loan Banks, Federal Farm Credit Banks, and Government National Mortgage Association.

The amortized cost and estimated market value of debt securities at June 30, 2011, by contractual maturity, are shown below. Expected maturities will differ from contractual maturities because borrowers may have the right to call or prepay obligations with or without call or prepayment penalties.


	Held-to-Maturity				Available-for-sale
	In Thousands
			Estimated				Estimated
	Amortized		Market		Amortized		Market
	Cost		Value		Cost		Value

Due in one year or less	$	521	$	527	$	2,252	$	2,259
Due after one year through five years		6,451		6,730		73,051		72,919
Due after five years through ten years		3,211		3,333		85,808		85,209
Due after ten years		4,555		4,637		84,239		84,417


	$	14,738	$	15,227	$	245,350	$	244,804

The following table shows the gross unrealized losses and fair value of the Company’s investments with unrealized losses that are not deemed to be other-than-temporarily impaired, aggregated by investment category and length of time that individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010.


	In Thousands, Except Number of Securities
	Less than 12 Months						12 Months or More						Total
					Number						Number
					of						of
	Fair		Unrealized		Securities		Fair		Unrealized		Securities		Fair		Unrealized
June 30, 2011	Value		Losses		Included		Value		Losses		Included		Value		Losses
Held to Maturity Securities:
Debt securities:
Mortgage-backed:
GSE residential	$	—	$	—		—	$	—	$	—		—	$	—	$	—

Obligations of states and political subdivisions		2,099		15		9		—		—		—		2,099		15


	$	2,099	$	15		9	$	—		—		—	$	2,099	$	15


Available-for-Sale Securities:
Debt securities:
U.S. Government and Federal agencies	$	—	$	—		—	$	—	$	—		—	$	—	$	—

GSEs		103,340		887		36		—		—		—		103,340		887

Mortgage-backed:
GSE residential		55,944		450		15		3,693		22		2		59,637		472

Obligations of states and political subdivisions		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—


	$	159,284	$	1,337		51	$	3,693	$	22		2	$	162,977	$	1,359


	In Thousands, Except Number of Securities
	Less than 12 Months						12 Months or More						Total
					Number						Number
					of						of
	Fair		Unrealized		Securities		Fair		Unrealized		Securities		Fair		Unrealized
December 31, 2010	Value		Losses		Included		Value		Losses		Included		Value		Losses
Held to Maturity Securities:
Debt securities:
Mortgage-backed:
GSE residential	$	1,034	$	6		1	$	—	$	—		—	$	1,034	$	6

Obligations of states and political subdivisions		3,278		88		14		—		—		—		3,278		88


	$	4,312	$	94		15	$	—	$	—		—	$	4,312	$	94


Available-for-Sale Securities:
Debt securities:
U.S. Government and Federal agencies	$	—	$	—		—	$	—	$	—		—	$	—	$	—

GSEs		102,458		2,646		36		—		—		—		102,458		2,646

Mortgage-backed:
GSE residential		113,512		3,069		34		—		—		—		113,512		3,069

Obligations of states and political subdivisions		345		7		1		—		—		—		345		7


	$	216,315	$	5,722		71	$	—	$	—		—	$	216,315	$	5,722

Because the Company does not intend to sell these securities and it is not more likely than not that the Company will be required to sell the securities before recovery of their amortized cost bases, which may be maturity, the Company does not consider these securities to be other-than-temporarily impaired at June 30, 2011.

The carrying values of the Company’s investment securities could decline in the future if the financial condition of issuers deteriorate and management determines it is probable that the Company will not recover the entire amortized cost bases of the securities. As a result, there is a risk that other-than-temporary impairment charges may occur in the future given the current economic environment.

Note 4. Earnings Per Share

The computation of basic earnings per share is based on the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. The computation of diluted earnings per share for the Company begins with the basic earnings per share plus the effect of common shares contingently issuable from stock options.

The following is a summary of components comprising basic and diluted earnings per share (“EPS”) for the three months and six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010:


	Three Months Ended				Six Months Ended
	June 30,				June 30,
	2011		2010		2011		2010
	(Dollars in Thousands				(Dollars in Thousands
	Except Per Share Amounts)				Except Per Share Amounts)

Basic EPS Computation:
Numerator — Earnings available to common Stockholders	$	2,615	$	1,655	$	5,091	$	4,240


Denominator — Weighted average number of common shares outstanding		7,268,537		7,185,208		7,263,342		7,178,453


Basic earnings per common share	$	.36	$	.23	$	.70	$	.59


Diluted EPS Computation:
Numerator — Earnings available to common Stockholders	$	2,615	$	1,655	$	5,091	$	4,240


Denominator — Weighted average number of common shares outstanding		7,268,537		7,185,208		7,263,342		7,178,453
Dilutive effect of stock options		7,548		7,991		6,944		7,029

		7,276,085		7,193,199		7,270,286		7,185,482


Diluted earnings per common share	$	.36	$	.23	$	.70	$	.59

Note 5. Income Taxes

Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 740, Income Taxes, defines the threshold for recognizing the benefits of tax return positions in the financial statements as “more-likely-than-not” to be sustained by the taxing authority. This section also provides guidance on the derecognition, measurement and classification of income tax uncertainties, along with any related interest and penalties, and includes guidance concerning accounting for income tax uncertainties in interim periods. As of June 30, 2011, the Company had no unrecognized tax benefits related to Federal or State income tax matters and does not anticipate any material increase or decrease in unrecognized tax benefits relative to any tax positions taken prior to June 30, 2011.

As of June 30, 2011, the Company has accrued no interest and no penalties related to uncertain tax positions. The Company’s policy is to recognize interest and/or penalties related to income tax matters in income tax expense.

The Company and its subsidiaries file consolidated U.S. Federal and state of Tennessee income tax returns. The Company is currently open to audit under the statute of limitations by the state of Tennessee for the years ended December 31, 2007 through 2010.

Note 6. Commitments and Contingent Liabilities

In the normal course of business, the Company has entered into off-balance sheet financial instruments which include commitments to extend credit (i.e., including unfunded lines of credit) and standby letters of credit. Commitments to extend credit are usually the result of lines of credit granted to existing borrowers under agreements that the total outstanding indebtedness will not exceed a specific amount during the term of the indebtedness. Typical borrowers are commercial concerns that use lines of credit to supplement their treasury management functions, thus their total outstanding indebtedness may fluctuate during any time period based on the seasonality of their business and the resultant timing of their cash flows. Other typical lines of credit are related to home equity loans granted to consumers. Commitments to extend credit generally have fixed expiration dates or other termination clauses and may require payment of a fee.

Standby letters of credit are generally issued on behalf of an applicant (our customer) to a specifically named beneficiary and are the result of a particular business arrangement that exists between the applicant and the beneficiary. Standby letters of credit have fixed expiration dates and are usually for terms of two years or less unless terminated beforehand due to criteria specified in the standby letter of credit. A typical arrangement involves the applicant routinely being indebted to the beneficiary for such items as inventory purchases, insurance, utilities, lease guarantees or other third party commercial transactions. The standby letter of credit would permit the beneficiary to obtain payment from the Company under certain prescribed circumstances. Subsequently, the Company would then seek reimbursement from the applicant pursuant to the terms of the standby letter of credit.

The Company follows the same credit policies and underwriting practices when making these commitments as it does for on-balance sheet instruments. Each customer’s creditworthiness is evaluated on a case-by-case basis, and the amount of collateral obtained, if any, is based on management’s credit evaluation of the customer. Collateral held varies but may include cash, real estate and improvements, marketable securities, accounts receivable, inventory, equipment, and personal property.

The contractual amounts of these commitments are not reflected in the consolidated financial statements and would only be reflected if drawn upon. Since many of the commitments are expected to expire without being drawn upon, the contractual amounts do not necessarily represent future cash requirements. However, should the commitments be drawn upon and should our customers default on their resulting obligation to us, the Company’s maximum exposure to credit loss, without consideration of collateral, is represented by the contractual amount of those instruments.

A summary of the Company’s total contractual amount for all off-balance sheet commitments at June 30, 2011 is as follows:


Commitments to extend credit	$	175,564,000
Standby letters of credit		19,219,000

The Company originates residential mortgage loans, sells them to third-party purchasers, and does not retain the servicing rights. These loans are originated internally and are primarily to borrowers in the Company’s geographic market footprint. These sales are typically on a best efforts basis to investors that follow conventional government sponsored entities (GSE) and the Department of Housing and Urban Development/U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (HUD/VA) guidelines. Generally, loans sold to the HUD/VA are underwritten by the Company while the majority of the loans sold to other investors are underwritten by the purchaser of the loans.

Each purchaser has specific guidelines and criteria for sellers of loans, and the risk of credit loss with regard to the principal amount of the loans sold is generally transferred to the purchasers upon sale. While the loans are sold without recourse, the purchase agreements require the Company to make certain representations and warranties regarding the existence and sufficiency of file documentation and the absence of fraud by borrowers or other third parties such as appraisers in connection with obtaining the loan. If it is determined that the loans sold were in breach of these representations or warranties, The Company has obligations to either repurchase the loan for the unpaid principal balance and related investor fees or make the purchaser whole for the economic benefits of the loan.

To date, repurchase activity pursuant to the terms of these representations and warranties has been insignificant and has resulted in insignificant losses to the Company.

Based on information currently available, management believes that it does not have significant exposure to contingent losses that may arise relating to the representations and warranties that it has made in connection with its mortgage loan sales.

Various legal claims also arise from time to time in the normal course of business. In the opinion of management, the resolution of these claims outstanding at June 30, 2011 will not have a material impact on the Company’s financial statements.

Note 7. Fair Value Measurements

In September 2006, the FASB issued ASC 820, “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures.” FASB ASC 820, which defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in U.S. generally accepted accounting principles and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. FASB ASC 820 applies only to fair-value measurements that are already required or permitted by other accounting standards and is expected to increase the consistency of those measurements. The definition of fair value focuses on the exit price, i.e., the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date, not the entry price, i.e., the price that would be paid to acquire the asset or received to assume the liability at the measurement date. The statement emphasizes that fair value is a market-based measurement, not an entity-specific measurement. Therefore, the fair value measurement should be determined based on the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability.

Valuation Hierarchy

FASB ASC 820 establishes a three-level valuation hierarchy for disclosure of fair value measurements. The valuation hierarchy is based upon the transparency of inputs to the valuation of an asset or liability as of the measurement date. The three levels are defined as follows:

• Level 1 —inputs to the valuation methodology are quoted prices (unadjusted) for identical assets or liabilities in active markets.

• Level 2 —inputs to the valuation methodology include quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets, and inputs that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly, for substantially the full term of the financial instrument.

• Level 3 —inputs to the valuation methodology are unobservable and significant to the fair value measurement.

A financial instrument’s categorization within the valuation hierarchy is based upon the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. Following is a description of the valuation methodologies used for assets and liabilities measured at fair value, as well as the general classification of such assets and liabilities pursuant to the valuation hierarchy.

Assets

Securities available for sale — Where quoted prices are available in an active market, securities are classified within Level 1 of the valuation hierarchy. Level 1 securities include highly liquid government securities and certain other products. If quoted market prices are not available, then fair values are estimated by using pricing models, quoted prices of securities with similar characteristics, or discounted cash flows and are classified within Level 2 of the valuation hierarchy. In certain cases where there is limited activity or less transparency around inputs to the valuation, securities are classified within Level 3 of the valuation hierarchy.

Impaired loans — A loan is considered to be impaired when it is probable the Company will be unable to collect all principal and interest payments due in accordance with the contractual terms of the loan agreement. Impaired loans are measured based on the present value of expected payments using the loan’s original effective rate as the discount rate, the loan’s observable market price, or the fair value of the collateral if the loan is collateral dependent. If the recorded investment in the impaired loan exceeds the measure of fair value, a valuation allowance may be established as a component of the allowance for loan losses or the expense is recognized as a charge-off. Impaired loans are classified within Level 3 of the hierarchy.

Other real estate — Other real estate, consisting of properties obtained through foreclosure or in satisfaction of loans, is initially recorded at fair value, determined on the basis of current appraisals, comparable sales, and other estimates of value obtained principally from independent sources, adjusted for estimated selling costs. At the time of foreclosure, any excess of the loan balance over the fair value of the real estate held as collateral is treated as a charge against the allowance for loan losses. Gains or losses on sale and any subsequent adjustments to the fair value are recorded as a component of foreclosed real estate expense. Other real estate is included in Level 3 of the valuation hierarchy.

Other assets — Included in other assets are certain assets carried at fair value, including the cash surrender value of bank owned life insurance policies. The carrying amount of the cash surrender value of bank owned life insurance is based on information received from the insurance carriers indicating the financial performance of the policies and the amount the Company would receive should the policies be surrendered. The Company reflects these assets within Level 3 of the valuation hierarchy.

The following tables present the financial instruments carried at fair value as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, by caption on the consolidated balance sheets and by FASB ASC 820 valuation hierarchy (as described above) (dollars in thousands)

Assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis are summarized below:

Fair Value Measurements at June 30, 2011


	Carrying		Quoted Prices in
	Value at		Active Markets		Significant Other		Significant
	June 30,		for Identical		Observable		Unobservable
(in Thousands)	2011		Assets (Level 1)		Inputs (Level 2)		Inputs (Level 3)
Assets:
Available-for-sale securities	$	244,804	$	2,006	$	242,798	$	—
Cash surrender value of life insurance		1,584		—		—		1,584

Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2010


	Carrying		Quoted Prices in
	Value at		Active Markets		Significant Other		Significant
	December 31,		for Identical		Observable		Unobservable
(in Thousands)	2010		Assets (Level 1)		Inputs (Level 2)		Inputs (Level 3)
Assets:
Available-for-sale securities	$	277,032	$	2,012	$	275,020	$	—
Cash surrender value of life insurance		1,554		—		—		1,554

Assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis are summarized below:

Fair Value Measurements at June 30, 2011


	Carrying		Quoted Prices in
	Value at		Active Markets		Significant Other		Significant
	June 30,		for Identical		Observable		Unobservable
(in Thousands)	2011		Assets (Level 1)		Inputs (Level 2)		Inputs (Level 3)
Assets:
Impaired loans	$	49,838	$	—	$	—	$	49,838
Other real estate		14,175		—		—		14,175
Repossesed assets		30		—		—		30

Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2010


	Carrying		Quoted Prices in
	Value at		Active Markets		Significant Other		Significant
	December 31,		for Identical		Observable		Unobservable
(in Thousands)	2010		Assets (Level 1)		Inputs (Level 2)		Inputs (Level 3)
Assets:
Impaired loans	$	50,450	$	—	$	—	$	50,450
Other real estate		13,741		—		—		13,741
Repossesed assets		41		—		—		41

Changes in level 3 fair value measurements

The table below includes a roll forward of the balance sheet amounts for the six months ended June 30, 2011 (including the change in fair value) for financial instruments classified by the Company within Level 3 of the valuation hierarchy for assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis. When a determination is made to classify a financial instrument within Level 3 of the valuation hierarchy, the determination is based upon the significance of the unobservable factors to the overall fair value measurements. However, since Level 3 financial instruments typically include, in addition to the unobservable or Level 3 components, observable components (that is, components that are actively quoted and can be validated to external sources), the gains and losses in the table below include changes in fair value due in part to observable factors that are part of the valuation methodology.

Six months ended, June 30, 2011 (in thousands)


	Assets		Liabilities
Fair Value, January 1, 2011	$	1,554	$	—
Total realized gains included in income		30		—
Purchases, issuances and settlements, net		—		—
Transfers in and/or (out) of Level 3		—		—

Fair Value, June 30, 2011	$	1,584	$	—

Total realized gains (losses) included in income related to financial assets and liabilities still on the consolidated balance sheet at June 30, 2011	$	—	$	—

The following methods and assumptions were used by the Company in estimating its fair value disclosures for financial instruments that are not measured at fair value. In cases where quoted market prices are not available, fair values are based on estimates using discounted cash flow models. Those models are significantly affected by the assumptions used, including the discount rates and estimates of future cash flows. In that regard, the derived fair value estimates cannot be substantiated by comparison to independent markets and, in many cases, could not be realized in immediate settlement of the instrument. The use of different methodologies may have a material effect on the estimated fair value amounts. The fair value estimates presented herein are based on pertinent information available to management as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010. Such amounts have not been revalued for purposes of these consolidated financial statements since those dates and, therefore, current estimates of fair value may differ significantly from the amounts presented herein.

Cash, Due From Banks and Federal Funds Sold —The carrying amounts of cash, due from banks, and federal funds sold approximate their fair value.

Securities held to maturity and available for sale —Estimated fair values for securities held to maturity are based on quoted market prices where available. If quoted market prices are not available, estimated fair values are based on quoted market prices of comparable instruments.

Loans —For variable-rate loans that reprice frequently and have no significant change in credit risk, fair values approximate carrying values. For other loans, fair values are estimated using discounted cash flow models, using current market interest rates offered for loans with similar terms to borrowers of similar credit quality. Fair values for impaired loans are estimated using discounted cash flow models or based on the fair value of the underlying collateral.

Mortgage loans held-for-sale —Mortgage loans held-for-sale are carried at the lower of cost or fair value and are classified within Level 2 of the valuation hierarchy. The inputs for valuation of these assets are based on the anticipated sales price of these loans as the loans are usually sold within a few weeks of their origination.

Deposits, Securities Sold Under Agreements to Repurchase, Federal Home Loan Bank Advances —The carrying amounts of demand deposits, savings deposits, securities sold under agreements to repurchase, floating rate advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank and floating rate subordinated debt approximate their fair values. Fair values for certificates of deposit and fixed rate advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank are estimated using discounted cash flow models, using current market interest rates offered on certificates, advances and other borrowings with similar remaining maturities.

The carrying value and estimated fair values of the Company’s financial instruments at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 are as follows:


	In Thousands
	June 30, 2011				December 31, 2010
	Carrying				Carrying
	Amount		Fair Value		Amount		Fair Value

Financial assets:
Cash and short-term Investments	$	64,266		64,266	$	38,282		38,282
Securities available-for-sale		244,804		244,804		277,032		277,032
Securities, held to maturity		14,738		15,227		13,396		13,690
Loans, net of unearned Interest		1,121,067				1,095,268
Less: allowance for loan Losses		23,429				22,177

Loans, net of allowance		1,097,638		1,096,580		1,073,091		1,075,663


Loans held for sale		6,407		6,407		7,845		7,845
Restricted equity securities		3,012		3,012		3,012		3,012
Cash surrender value of life insurance		1,584		1,584		1,554		1,554
Other real estate		14,175		14,175		13,741		13,741

Financial liabilities:
Deposits		1,339,267		1,345,580		1,331,282		1,339,747
Securities sold under repurchase agreements		6,302		6,302		6,536		6,536

Unrecognized financial instruments:
Commitments to extend credit		—		—		—		—
Standby letters of credit		—		—		—		—


*Item 2.*		*Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations*

Forward-Looking Statements

This Form 10-Q contains certain forward-looking statements regarding, among other things, the anticipated financial and operating results of the Company. Investors are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date hereof. The Company undertakes no obligation to publicly release any modifications or revisions to these forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances occurring after the date hereof or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events.

In connection with the “safe harbor” provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, the Company cautions investors that future financial and operating results may differ materially from those projected in forward-looking statements made by, or on behalf of, the Company. The words “expect,” “intend,” “should,” “may,” “could,” “believe,” “suspect,” “anticipate,” “seek,” “plan,” “estimate” and similar expressions are intended to identify such forward-looking statements, but other statements not based on historical fact may also be considered forward-looking. Such forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks and uncertainties, including, but not limited to those described in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010, as updated in the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2011 and also includes, without limitation, (i) deterioration in the financial condition of borrowers resulting in significant increases in loan losses and provisions for these losses, (ii) greater than anticipated deterioration in the real estate market conditions in the Company’s market areas, (iii) increased competition with other financial institutions, (iv) the deterioration of the economy in the Company’s market area, (v) continuation of the extremely low short-term interest rate environment or rapid fluctuations in short-term interest rates, (vi) significant downturns in the business of one or more large customers, (vii) changes in state or Federal regulations, policies, or legislation applicable to banks and other financial service providers, including regulatory or legislative developments arising out of current unsettled conditions in the economy, including implementation of the Dodd Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, (vii) changes in capital levels and loan underwriting, credit review or loss reserve policies associated with economic conditions, examination conclusions, or regulatory developments, (ix) inadequate allowance for loan losses, (x) the effectiveness of the Company’s activities in improving, resolving or liquidating lower quality assets, (xi) results of regulatory examinations, and (xii) loss of key personnel. These risks and uncertainties may cause the actual results or performance of the Company to be materially different from any future results or performance expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. The Company’s future operating results depend on a number of factors which were derived utilizing numerous assumptions that could cause actual results to differ materially from those projected in forward-looking statements.

The purpose of this discussion is to provide insight into the financial condition and results of operations of the Company and its bank subsidiary. This discussion should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements. Reference should also be made to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 for a more complete discussion of factors that impact liquidity, capital and the results of operations.

Critical Accounting Estimates

The accounting principles we follow and our methods of applying these principles conform with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles and with general practices within the banking industry. In connection with the application of those principles, we have made judgments and estimates which, in the case of the determination of our allowance for loan losses and the assessment of impairment of the intangibles resulting from our mergers with Dekalb Community Bank and Community Bank of Smith County in 2005 have been critical to the determination of our financial position and results of operations.

Allowance for Loan Losses (“allowance”). Our management assesses the adequacy of the allowance prior to the end of each calendar quarter. This assessment includes procedures to estimate the allowance and test the adequacy and appropriateness of the resulting balance. The level of the allowance is based upon management’s evaluation of the loan portfolio, past loan loss experience, current asset quality trends, known and inherent risks in the portfolio, adverse situations that may affect the borrower’s ability to repay (including the timing of future payment), the estimated value of any underlying collateral, composition of the loan portfolio, economic conditions, industry and peer bank loan quality indications and other pertinent factors, including regulatory recommendations. This evaluation is inherently subjective as it requires material estimates including the amounts and timing of future cash flows expected to be received on impaired loans that may be susceptible to significant change. Loan losses are charged off when management believes that the full collectability of the loan is unlikely. A loan may be partially charged-off after a “confirming event” has occurred which serves to validate that full repayment pursuant to the terms of the loan is unlikely. Allocation of the allowance may be made for specific loans, but the entire allowance is available for any loan that, in management’s judgment, is deemed to be uncollectible.

A loan is impaired when, based on current information and events, it is probable that we will be unable to collect all amounts due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement. Collection of all amounts due according to the contractual terms means that both the interest and principal payments of a loan will be collected as scheduled in the loan agreement.

An impairment allowance is recognized if the fair value of the loan is less than the recorded investment in the loan (recorded investment in the loan is the principal balance plus any accrued interest, net of deferred loan fees or costs and unamortized premium or discount). The impairment is recognized through the allowance. Loans that are impaired are recorded at the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate, or if the loan is collateral dependent, impairment measurement is based on the fair value of the collateral, less estimated disposal costs. If the measure of the impaired loan is less than the recorded investment in the loan, the Company recognizes an impairment by creating a valuation allowance with a corresponding charge to the provision for loan losses or by adjusting an existing valuation allowance for the impaired loan with a corresponding charge or credit to the provision for loan losses. Management believes it follows appropriate accounting and regulatory guidance in determining impairment and accrual status of impaired loans.

The level of allowance maintained is believed by management to be adequate to absorb probable losses inherent in the portfolio at the balance sheet date. The allowance is increased by provisions charged to expense and decreased by charge-offs, net of recoveries of amounts previously charged-off.

In assessing the adequacy of the allowance, we also consider the results of our ongoing loan review process. We undertake this process both to ascertain whether there are loans in the portfolio whose credit quality has weakened over time and to assist in our overall evaluation of the risk characteristics of the entire loan portfolio. Our loan review process includes the judgment of management, the input from our independent loan reviewers, and reviews that may have been conducted by bank regulatory agencies as part of their usual examination process. We incorporate loan review results in the determination of whether or not it is probable that we will be able to collect all amounts due according to the contractual terms of a loan.

As part of management’s quarterly assessment of the allowance, management divides the loan portfolio into twelve segments based on bank call reporting requirements. Each segment is then analyzed such that an allocation of the allowance is estimated for each loan segment.

The allowance allocation begins with a process of estimating the probable losses in each of the twelve loan segments. The estimates for these loans are based on our historical loss data for that category over the last eight quarters.

The estimated loan loss allocation for all twelve loan portfolio segments is then adjusted for several “environmental” factors. The allocation for environmental factors is particularly subjective and does not lend itself to exact mathematical calculation. This amount represents estimated probable inherent credit losses which exist, but have not yet been identified, as of the balance sheet date, and are based upon quarterly trend assessments in delinquent and nonaccrual loans, unanticipated charge-offs, credit concentration changes, prevailing economic conditions, changes in lending personnel experience, changes in lending policies or procedures and other influencing factors. These environmental factors are considered for each of the twelve loan segments and the allowance allocation, as determined by the processes noted above for each component, is increased or decreased based on the incremental assessment of these various environmental factors.

We then test the resulting allowance by comparing the balance in the allowance to industry and peer information. Our management then evaluates the result of the procedures performed, including the result of our testing, and concludes on the appropriateness of the balance of the allowance in its entirety. The board of directors reviews and approves the assessment prior to the filing of quarterly and annual financial information.

Impairment of Intangible Assets. Long-lived assets, including purchased intangible assets subject to amortization, such as our core deposit intangible asset, are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. Recoverability of assets to be held and used is measured by a comparison of the carrying amount of an asset to estimated undiscounted future cash flows expected to be generated by the asset. If the carrying amount of an asset exceeds its estimated future cash flows, an impairment charge is recognized by the amount by which the carrying amount of the asset exceeds the fair value of the asset. Assets to be disposed of would be separately presented in the balance sheet and reported at the lower of the carrying amount or fair value less costs to sell, and are no longer depreciated.

Goodwill and intangible assets that have indefinite useful lives are evaluated for impairment annually and are evaluated for impairment more frequently if events and circumstances indicate that the asset might be impaired. That annual assessment date is December 31. An impairment loss is recognized to the extent that the carrying amount exceeds the asset’s fair value. The goodwill impairment analysis is a two-step test. The first step, used to identify potential impairment, involves comparing each reporting unit’s estimated fair value to its carrying value, including goodwill. If the estimated fair value of a reporting unit exceeds its carrying value, goodwill is considered not to be impaired. If the carrying value exceeds estimated fair value, there is an indication of potential impairment and the second step is performed to measure the amount of impairment.

If required, the second step involves calculating an implied fair value of goodwill for each reporting unit for which the first step indicated potential impairment. The implied fair value of goodwill is determined in a manner similar to the amount of goodwill calculated in a business combination, by measuring the excess of the estimated fair value of the reporting unit, as determined in the first step, over the aggregate estimated fair values of the individual assets, liabilities and identifiable intangibles as if the reporting unit was being acquired in a business combination. If the implied fair value of goodwill exceeds the carrying value of goodwill assigned to the reporting unit, there is no impairment. If the carrying value of goodwill assigned to a reporting unit exceeds the implied fair value of the goodwill, an impairment charge is recorded for the excess. An impairment loss cannot exceed the carrying value of goodwill assigned to a reporting unit, and the loss establishes a new basis in the goodwill.

Results of Operations

Net earnings increased 20.1% to $5,091,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2011 from $4,240,000 in the first six months of 2010. Net earnings were $2,615,000 for the quarter ended June 30, 2011, an increase of $960,000, or 58.0%, from $1,655,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2010 and an increase of $139,000, or 5.6%, over the quarter ended March 31, 2011. The increase in net earnings during the six months ended June 30, 2011 as compared to the prior year period was primarily due to a 4.1% increase in net interest income and a 3.1% increase in non-interest income, offset in part by a 19.9% increase in non-interest expense. Net earnings for the six months ended June 30, 2011 compared to June 30, 2010 were positively impacted by a $3,592,000, or 43.9%, decrease in provision for loan losses over the prior year’s comparable period. See “Provision for Loan Losses” for further explanation. Net interest spread for the six months ended June 30, 2011 was 3.64% as compared to 3.38% for the first six months of 2010 and the net yield on earning assets was 3.83% for the quarter ended June 30, 2011 compared to 3.63% for the six months ended June 30, 2010. The increase in net interest spread for the six months ended June 30, 2011, is primarily the result of the Company’s ability to continue to reduce cost of funds, primarily deposit rates, while also growing its funding base.

The average balances, interest, and average rates for the six-month periods ended June 30, 2011 and June 30, 2010 are presented in the following table:


	June 30, 2011								June 30, 2010
	Average			Interest			Income/		Average			Interest			Income/
	Balance			Rate			Expense		Balance			Rate			Expense

Loans, net of unearned interest	$	1,100,888			5.96	%		32,824		1,099,086			6.17	%		33,891

Investment securities — taxable		259,049			2.20			2,846		278,185			3.29			4,577

Investment securities — tax exempt		12,908			3.32			214		12,947			3.61			234

Taxable equivalent adjustment		—			1.99			110		—			1.99			120

Total tax-exempt investment securities		12,908			5.02			324		12,947			5.48			354


Total investment securities		271,957			2.33			3,170		291,132			3.39			4,931


Loans held for sale		5,613			3.74			105		5,390			2.97			80

Federal funds sold		32,521			.26			42		32,827			.25			41

Restricted equity securities		3,012			4.32			65		3,012			4.12			62


Total earning assets		1,413,991			5.12	%		36,206		1,431,447			5.45	%		39,005


Cash and due from banks		23,779								22,665

Allowance for loan losses		(22,664	)							(18,400	)

Bank premises and equipment		32,332								30,599

Other assets		44,504								36,720


Total assets	$	1,491,942								1,503,031


	June 30, 2011							June 30, 2010
	Average		Interest			Income/		Average		Interest			Income/
	Balance		Rate			Expense		Balance		Rate			Expense
Deposits:
Negotiable order of withdrawal accounts	$	238,851		0.93	%		1,107		210,402		1.26	%		1,327
Money market demand accounts		263,682		0.80			1,050		234,574		1.15			1,353
Individual retirement accounts		96,315		2.20			1,061		93,651		2.84			1.330
Other savings deposits		66,823		1.13			376		43,921		1.47			322
Certificates of deposit $100,000 and over		270,565		2.06			2,786		345,632		2.39			4,126
Certificates of deposit under $100,000		293,887		1.87			2,746		323,294		2.79			4,513

Total interest-bearing deposits		1,230,123		1.48			9,126		1,251,474		2.07			12,971

Securities sold under repurchase agreements		5,784		0.93			27		5,497		1.46			40
Federal funds purchased		414		0.97			2		—		—			—
Advances from Federal Home Loan Bank		—		—			—		6		—			1

Total interest-bearing liabilities		1,236,321		1.48			9,155		1,256,977		2.07			13,012


Demand deposits		104,410							101,278

Other liabilities		6,674							6,788

Stockholders’ equity		144,537							137,812

Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	1,491,942						$	1,502,853


Net interest income						$	27,051						$	25,993


Net yield on earning assets (1)				3.83	%						3.63	%


Net interest spread (2)				3.64	%						3.38	%


(1)		Net interest income divided by average earning assets.

(2)		Average interest rate on earning assets less average interest rate on interest-bearing liabilities.

Net Interest Income

Net interest income represents the amount by which interest earned on various earning assets exceeds interest paid on deposits and other interest-bearing liabilities and is the most significant component of the Company’s earnings. The Company’s total interest income, excluding tax equivalent adjustments relating to tax exempt securities, decreased $2,789,000, or 7.2%, during the six months ended June 30, 2011 as compared to the same period in 2010. The decrease in total interest income was $1,488,000, or 7.6%, for the quarter ended June 30, 2011 as compared to the quarter ended June 30, 2010. Interest income for the second quarter of 2011 increased $266,000, or 1.5%, over the first three months of 2011. The decrease in the first six months of 2011 was primarily attributable to the continuing impact of low interest rate policies initiated by the Federal Reserve Board and the negative impact of higher non-accrual loan balances offset in part by the increases in earning assets. The ratio of average earning assets to total average assets was 94.8% and 95.2% for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and June 30, 2010, respectively.

Interest expense decreased $3,857,000, or 29.6%, for the six months ended June 30, 2011 as compared to the same period in 2010. The decrease was $1,832,000, or 29.1%, for the three months ended June 30, 2011 as compared to the same period in 2010. Interest expense decreased $243,000, or 5.2%, for the quarter ended June 30, 2011 over the first three months of 2011. The decrease for the quarter ended June 30, 2011 and for the six months ended June 30, 2011 as compared to the prior year’s comparable periods was primarily due to a decrease in the rates paid on deposits, particularly time deposits, reflecting the low interest rate environment and a shift in the mix of deposits from certificate of deposits to transaction and money market accounts.

The foregoing resulted in an increase in net interest income, before the provision for loan losses, of $1,068,000, or 4.1%, for the first six months of 2011 as compared to the same period in 2010. The increase was $344,000, or 2.6%, for the quarter ended June 30, 2011 compared to the quarter ended June 30, 2010. When compared to the first quarter of 2011, the Company experienced an increase of $509,000, or 3.9% in net interest income.

Provision for Loan Losses

The provision for loan losses was $4,587,000 and $8,179,000 for the first six months of 2011 and 2010, respectively. The provision for loan losses during the three month periods ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 was $2,618,000 and $6,073,000, respectively. The decrease in the provision in the second quarter of 2011 and first six months of 2011 was primarily related to management’s quarterly assessment of the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses. The allowance for loan losses is based on past loan experience and other factors which, in management’s judgment, deserve current recognition in estimating possible loan losses. Such factors include growth and composition of the loan portfolio, review of specific problem loans, review of updated appraisals and borrower financial information, the recommendations of the Company’s regulators, and current economic conditions that may affect the borrower’s ability to repay. Management has in place a system designed for monitoring its loan portfolio and identifying potential problem loans. The provision for loan losses raised the allowance for loan losses (net of charge-offs and recoveries) to $23,429,000, an increase of 5.7% from $22,177,000 at December 31, 2010 and an increase of $1,381,000, or 6.3%, from March 31, 2011. The allowance for loan losses was 2.09%, 2.01%, and 2.02% of total loans at June 30, 2011, March 31, 2011, and December 31, 2010, respectively.

Management believes the allowance for loan losses at June 30, 2011 to be adequate, but if economic conditions continue to deteriorate beyond management’s current expectations and additional charge-offs are incurred, the allowance for loan losses may require an increase through additional provision for loan losses which would negatively impact earnings.

Non-Interest Income

The components of the Company’s non-interest income include service charges on deposit accounts, other fees and commissions and gain on sale of loans. Total non-interest income for the six months ended June 30, 2011 increased 3.1% to $6,787,000 from $6,583,000 for the same period in 2010. Total non-interest income increased $10,000, or 0.3%, during the quarter ended June 30, 2011 compared to the second quarter in 2010 and there was an increase of $331,000, or 10.3%, over the first three months of 2011. Gain on sale of loans decreased $3,000, or 0.4%, during the six months ended June 30, 2011 compared to the same periods in 2010. Gain on sale of loans increased $16,000, or 4.0%, during the quarter ended June 30, 2011 compared to the same quarter in 2010. The Company’s non-interest income in 2011 was reduced from the first six months of 2010 in part due to gains recognized on sale of investments from portfolio restructuring in the 2010 period. Service charges on deposit accounts decreased $48,000, or 1.8%, during the six months ended June 30, 2011 compared to the same period in 2010 and decreased $44,000, or 3.2%, during the quarter ended June 30, 2011 compared to the second quarter of 2010 as a result of consumers continuing to slow their spending due to the current economic environment. Other fees and commissions increased $516,000, or 17.6%, during the six months ended June 30, 2011 compared to the same period in 2010. The increase was $249,000, or 15.9%, during the quarter ended June 30, 2011 compared to the second quarter of 2010 and there was an increase of $171,000, or 10.4%, over the first three months of 2011. Other fees and commissions include income on brokerage accounts, insurance policies sold and various other fees.

Non-Interest Expenses

Non-interest expenses consist primarily of employee costs, occupancy expenses, furniture and equipment expenses, data processing expenses, director’s fees, loss on sale of other assets, loss on sale of real estate and other operating expenses. Total non-interest expense increased $3,457,000, or 19.9%, during the first six months of 2011 compared to the same period in 2010. The increase for the quarter ended June 30, 2011 was $2,209,000, or 27.0%, as compared to the comparable quarter in 2010. The Company experienced a decrease of $62,000, or 0.6%, in non-interest expenses in the second quarter of 2011 as compared to the first three months of 2011. The increase in non-interest expenses when compared to the comparable period in 2010 is primarily attributable to an increase in employee salaries and benefits as the Company has expanded with the opening of two new offices during the first six months of 2011. Other operating expenses for the six months ended June 30, 2011 increased to $6,066,000 from $5,347,000 for the comparable period in 2010. Other operating expenses increased $63,000, or 2.3%, during the quarter ended June 30, 2011 as compared to the same period in 2010. The increase in other operating expenses for the six months ended June 30, 2011 is primarily attributable to an increase in other real estate owned caused by an increase in costs associated with the disposal and maintenance of other real estate.

Income Taxes

The Company’s income tax expense was $3,222,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2011, an increase of $556,000 over the comparable period in 2010. Income tax expense was $1,668,000 for the quarter ended June 30, 2011, an increase of $640,000 over the same period in 2010. The percentage of income tax expense to net income before taxes was 38.8% for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 38.6% for the six months ended June 30 2010, respectively, and 39.0% and 38.3% for the quarters ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. The percentage of income tax expense to net income before taxes was 38.6% for the first three months of 2011.

Financial Condition

Balance Sheet Summary

The Company’s total assets increased 1.1% to $1,504,973,000 during the six months ended June 30, 2011 from $1,488,106,000 at December 31, 2010. Total assets increased $5,232,000 during the three-month period ended June 30, 2011 and increased $11,635,000, or 0.8%, during the three-month period ended March 31, 2011. Loans, net of allowance for loan losses, totaled $1,097,638,000 at June 30, 2011, a 2.3% increase compared to $1,073,091,000 at December 31, 2010. Loans increased $21,943,000, or 2.0%, during the three months ended June 30, 2011. Securities decreased $30,886,000, or 10.6%, to $259,542,000 at June 30, 2011 from $290,428,000 at December 31, 2010. Securities decreased $6,989,000, or 2.6%, during the three months ended June 30, 2011. Federal funds sold increased to $26,730,000 at June 30, 2011 from $3,225,000 at December 31, 2010, resulting from a growth in deposits that exceeded loan growth and a reduction in securities.

Total liabilities increased by 0.7% to $1,353,093,000 at June 30, 2011 compared to $1,343,773,000 at December 31, 2010. For the quarter ended June 30, 2011 total liabilities increased $1,084,000, or 0.1%. The increase in total liabilities for the six months ended June 30, 2011, was comprised primarily of a $7,985,000, or 0.6%, increase in total deposits, offset by a decrease of $234,000, or 3.6%, in securities sold under repurchase agreements during the six months ended June 30, 2011.

Non Performing Assets

The following tables present the Company’s non-accrual loans and past due loans as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010.

Loans on Nonaccrual Status


	In Thousands
	2011		2010

Residential 1-4 family	$	3,159		3,611
Multifamily		—		—
Commercial real estate		332		7,465
Construction		11,765		7,850
Farmland		2,723		1,308
Second mortgages		686		770
Equity lines of credit		—		667
Commercial		239		490
Installment and other		—		—

Total	$	18,904	$	22,161


	In Thousands
													Recorded
													Investment
	30-59		60-89		Greater								Greater Than
	Days		Days		Than		Total				Total		90 Days and
	Past Due		Past Due		90 Days		Past Due		Current		Loans		Accruing

June 30, 2011

Residential 1-4 family	$	4,052		1,542		4,789		10,383		340,911		351,294		1,630
Multifamily		—		—		—		—		9,251		9,251		—
Commercial real estate		423		462		5,135		6,020		386,463		392,483		4,803
Construction		205		3,841		14,497		18,543		160,100		178,643		2,733
Farmland		183		—		2,925		3,108		32,883		35,991		202
Second mortgages		320		131		695		1,146		13,321		14,467		9
Equity lines of credit		25		—		37		62		36,221		36,283		37
Commercial		139		100		527		766		47,322		48,088		288
Agricultural, installment and other		418		119		130		667		55,744		56,411		130

Total	$	5,765		6,195		28,735		40,695		1,082,216		1,122,911		9,832


December 31, 2010

Residential 1-4 family	$	5,714		1,080		5,141		11,935		339,302		351,237		1,530
Multifamily		53		—		79		132		8,579		8,711		79
Commercial real estate		558		200		7,673		8,431		338,950		347,381		208
Construction		1,830		160		8,028		10,018		166,824		176,842		178
Farmland		1,572		188		1,651		3,411		34,958		38,369		343
Second mortgages		215		48		890		1,153		14,220		15,373		120
Equity lines of credit		73		—		667		740		36,121		36,861		—
Commercial		330		2		492		824		56,425		57,249		2
Agricultural, installment and other		872		159		108		1,139		63,453		64,592		108

Total	$	11,217		1,837		24,729		37,783		1,058,832		1,096,615		2,568

Generally, at the time a loan is placed on nonaccrual status, all interest accrued on the loan in the current fiscal year is reversed from income, and all interest accrued and uncollected from the prior year is charged off against the allowance for loan losses. Thereafter, interest on nonaccrual loans is recognized as interest income only to the extent that cash is received and future collection of principal is not in doubt. A nonaccrual loan may be restored to accruing status when principal and interest are no longer past due and unpaid and future collection of principal and interest on a timely basis is not in doubt.

Non-performing loans, which included non-accrual loans and loans 90 days past due, at June 30, 2011 totaled $28,735,000, an increase from $24,729,000 at December 31, 2010. The increase in non-performing loans during the six months ended June 30,2011 of $4,006,000 is due primarily to an increase in non-performing construction real estate mortgage loans of $6,469,000, an increase in non-performing commercial loans of $35,000, an increase in non-performing consumer loans of $22,000, off-set in part by a decrease in non-performing real estate mortgage loans of $2,520,000. The increase in non-performing loans relates primarily to an increase in commercial real estate loans and construction loans that are 90 days past due and still accruing. Management believes that it is probable that it will incur losses on these loans but believes that these losses should not exceed the amount in the allowance for loan losses already allocated to these loans, unless there is further deterioration of local real estate values.

Other loans may be classified as impaired when the current net worth and financial capacity of the borrower or of the collateral pledged, if any, is viewed as inadequate. Such loans generally have a well-defined weakness or weaknesses that jeopardize the liquidation of the debt, and if such deficiencies are not corrected, there is a probability that the Company will sustain some loss. In such cases, interest income continues to accrue as long as the loan does not meet the Company’s criteria for nonaccrual status.

The decrease in impaired loans in the six months ended June 30, 2011 was primarily due to foreclosure and subsequent sale of one large commercial real estate loan. The Company’s market areas continue to experience a weakened residential and commercial real estate market. Home builders and developers continue to experience stress during the current challenging economic environment due to a combination of reduced demand for residential real estate and the resulting price and collateral value declines. Housing starts in the Company’s market areas are at very low levels. The allowance for loan loss related to impaired loans was measured based upon the estimated fair value of related collateral.

Loans are charged-off in the month when the determination is made that a loss will be incurred. Net charge-offs for the six months ended June 30, 2011 were $3,336,000 as compared to $3,339,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2010.

The collateral values securing potential problem loans, including impaired loans, based on estimates received by management, total approximately $106,265,000 ($106,225,000 related to real property and $40,000 related to various other types of loans). The internally classified loans have increased $2,962,000, or 4.7%, from $63,166,000 at December 31, 2010. Loans are listed as classified when information obtained about possible credit problems of the borrower has prompted management to question the ability of the borrower to comply with the repayment terms of the loan agreement. The loan classifications do not represent or result from trends or uncertainties which management expects will materially impact future operating results, liquidity or capital resources.

The largest category of internally graded loans at June 30, 2011 was real estate mortgage loans. Included within this category are residential real estate construction and development loans, including loans to home builders and developers of land, as well as one to four family mortgage loans, and commercial real estate loans. Residential real estate loans, including construction and land development loans, that are internally classified totaled $39,656,000 and $36,698,000 at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively. These loans have been graded accordingly due to bankruptcies, inadequate cash flows and delinquencies. Borrowers within this segment have continued to experience stress during the current recession due to a combination of declining demand for residential real estate and the resulting price and collateral declines. In addition, housing starts in the Company’s market areas are at very low levels. An extended recessionary period will likely cause the Company’s real estate mortgage loans to continue to underperform and may result in increased levels of internally graded loans which, if they continue to deteriorate, may negatively impact the Company’s results of operation. Management does not anticipate losses on these loans to exceed the amount already allocated to loan losses, unless there is further deterioration of local real estate values.

Liquidity and Asset Management

The Company’s management seeks to maximize net interest income by managing the Company’s assets and liabilities within appropriate constraints on capital, liquidity and interest rate risk. Liquidity is the ability to maintain sufficient cash levels necessary to fund operations, meet the requirements of depositors and borrowers, and fund attractive investment opportunities. Higher levels of liquidity bear corresponding costs, measured in terms of lower yields on short-term, more liquid earning assets and higher interest expense involved in extending liability maturities.

Liquid assets include cash and cash equivalents and securities and money market instruments that will mature within one year. At June 30, 2011, the Company’s liquid assets totaled $215,655,000. The Company maintains a formal asset and liability management process to quantify, monitor and control interest rate risk and to assist management in maintaining stability in the net interest margin under varying interest rate environments. The Company accomplishes this process through the development and implementation of lending, funding and pricing strategies designed to maximize net interest income under varying interest rate environments subject to specific liquidity and interest rate risk guidelines.

Analysis of rate sensitivity and rate gap analysis are the primary tools used to assess the direction and magnitude of changes in net interest income resulting from changes in interest rates. Included in the analysis are cash flows and maturities of financial instruments held for purposes other than trading, changes in market conditions, loan volumes and pricing and deposit volume and mix. These assumptions are inherently uncertain, and, as a result, net interest income can not be precisely estimated nor can the impact of higher or lower interest rates on net interest income be precisely predicted. Actual results will differ due to timing, magnitude and frequency of interest rate changes and changes in market conditions and management’s strategies, among other factors.

The Company’s primary source of liquidity is a stable core deposit base. In addition to loan payments, investment security maturities and short-term borrowings provide a secondary source of liquidity.

Interest rate risk (sensitivity) focuses on the earnings risk associated with changing interest rates. Management seeks to maintain profitability in both immediate and long-term earnings through funds management/interest rate risk management. The Company’s rate sensitivity position has an important impact on earnings. Senior management of the Company meets monthly to analyze the rate sensitivity position of the Company’s bank subsidiary. These meetings focus on the spread between the Company’s cost of funds and interest yields generated primarily through loans and investments.

The Company’s securities portfolio consists of earning assets that provide interest income. For those securities classified as held-to-maturity, the Company has the ability and intent to hold these securities to maturity or on a long-term basis. Securities classified as available-for-sale include securities intended to be used as part of the Company’s asset/liability strategy and/or securities that may be sold in response to changes in interest rate, prepayment risk, the need or desire to increase capital and similar economic factors. Securities totaling approximately $2.8 million mature or will be subject to rate adjustments within the next twelve months.

A secondary source of liquidity is the Company’s loan portfolio. At June 30, 2011, loans totaling approximately $309.9 million either will become due or will be subject to rate adjustments within twelve months from the respective date. Continued emphasis will be placed on structuring adjustable rate loans.

As for liabilities, certificates of deposit of $100,000 or greater totaling approximately $208.2 million will become due or reprice during the next twelve months. Historically, there has been no significant reduction in immediately withdrawable accounts such as negotiable order of withdrawal accounts, money market demand accounts, demand deposit accounts and regular savings accounts. Management anticipates that there will be no significant withdrawals from these accounts in the future.

Management believes that with present maturities, the anticipated growth in deposit base, and the efforts of management in its asset/liability management program, liquidity will not pose a problem in the near term future. At the present time there are no known trends or any known commitments, demands, events or uncertainties that will result in or that are reasonably likely to result in the Company’s liquidity changing in a materially adverse way.

Capital Position and Dividends

At June 30, 2011, total stockholders’ equity was $151,880,000, or 10.1% of total assets, which compares with $144,333,000, or 9.7% of total assets, at December 31, 2010. The dollar increase in stockholders’ equity during the six months ended June 30, 2011 results from the Company’s net income of $5,091,000, proceeds from the issuance of common stock related to exercise of stock options of $71,000, the net effect of a $4,875,000 unrealized gain on investment securities net of applicable income taxes of $1,866,000, cash dividends declared of $2,168,000 of which $1,626,000 was reinvested under the Company’s dividend reinvestment plan, $94,000 relating to the repurchase of 2,336 shares of common stock by the Company, and $12,000 related to stock option compensation.

The Company and the Bank are subject to regulatory capital requirements administered by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, the Federal Reserve and the Tennessee Department of Financial Institutions. Failure to meet minimum capital requirements can initiate certain mandatory and possibly additional discretionary actions by regulators that, if undertaken, could have a direct material effect on the Company’s and Bank’s financial statements. Under capital adequacy guidelines and the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action, the Company and the Bank must meet specific capital guidelines that involve quantitative measures of their assets, liabilities and certain off-balance sheet items as calculated under regulatory accounting practices. The capital amounts and classification are also subject to qualitative judgments by the regulators about components, risk weightings, and other factors. Prompt corrective action provisions are not applicable to bank holding companies.

Quantitative measures established by regulation to ensure capital adequacy require the Company and the Bank to maintain minimum amounts and ratios (set forth in the following table) of total and Tier 1 capital (as defined in the regulations) to risk-weighted assets (as defined) and of Tier 1 capital (as defined) to average assets (as defined).

As of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the Company and the Bank are considered to be well capitalized under regulatory definitions. To be categorized as well capitalized, an institution must maintain minimum total risk-based, Tier 1 risk-based and Tier 1 leverage ratios as set forth in the following tables.

The Company’s and the Bank’s actual capital amounts and ratios as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, are also presented in the tables:


											Minimum To Be Well
											Capitalized Under
						Minimum Capital					Prompt Corrective
	Actual					Requirement					Action Provisions
	Amount		Ratio			Amount		Ratio			Amount		Ratio
	(dollars in thousands)

June 30, 2011:
*Total capital to risk weighted assets:*
*Consolidated*	$	161,885		13.8	%	$	93,846		8.0	%		N/A		N/A
*Wilson Bank*		159,328		13.6			93,722		8.0		$	117,153		10.0	%

*Tier 1 capital to risk weighted assets:*
*Consolidated*		147,102		12.5			47,073		4.0			N/A		N/A
*Wilson Bank*		144,555		12.3			47,010		4.0			70,515		6.0

*Tier 1 capital to average assets:*
*Consolidated*		147,102		9.9			59,435		4.0			N/A		N/A
*Wilson Bank*		144,555		9.7			59,610		4.0			74,513		5.0


											Minimum To Be Well
											Capitalized Under
						Minimum Capital					Prompt Corrective
	Actual					Requirement					Action Provisions
	Amount		Ratio			Amount		Ratio			Amount		Ratio
	(dollars in thousands)

December 31, 2010:
*Total capital to risk weighted assets:*
*Consolidated*	$	157,373		13.2	%	$	95,378		8.0	%		N/A		N/A
*Wilson Bank*		154,156		12.9			95,601		8.0		$	119,501		10.0	%

*Tier 1 capital to risk weighted assets:*
*Consolidated*		142,366		11.9			47,854		4.0			N/A		N/A
*Wilson Bank*		139,132		11.7			47,566		4.0			71,350		6.0

*Tier 1 capital to average assets:*
*Consolidated*		142,366		9.6			59,319		4.0			N/A		N/A
*Wilson Bank*		139,132		9.3			59,842		4.0			74,802		5.0

Impact of Inflation

Although interest rates are significantly affected by inflation, the inflation rate is immaterial when reviewing the Company’s results of operations.


*Item 3.*		*Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk*

The Company’s primary component of market risk is interest rate volatility. Fluctuations in interest rates will ultimately impact both the level of income and expense recorded on a large portion of the Company’s assets and liabilities, and the market value of all interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities, other than those which possess a short term to maturity. Based upon the nature of the Company’s operations, the Company is not subject to foreign currency exchange or commodity price risk.

Interest rate risk (sensitivity) management focuses on the earnings risk associated with changing interest rates. Management seeks to maintain profitability in both immediate and long-term earnings through funds management/interest rate risk management. The Company’s rate sensitivity position has an important impact on earnings. Senior management of the Company meets monthly to analyze the rate sensitivity position. These meetings focus on the spread between the cost of funds and interest yields generated primarily through loans and investments.

There have been no material changes in reported market risks during the six months ended June 30, 2011.


*Item 4.*		*Controls and Procedures*

The Company maintains disclosure controls and procedures, as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”), that are designated to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms and that such information is accumulated and communicated to the Company’s management, including its Chief Executive Officer and its Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. The Company carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of its management, including its Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of its disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on the evaluation of these disclosure controls and procedures, its Chief Executive Officer and its Chief Financial Officer concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective.

There were no changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting during the Company’s fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2011 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION


*Item 1.*		*LEGAL PROCEEDINGS*

None


*Item 1A.*		*RISK FACTORS*

There were no material changes to the Company’s risk factors as previously disclosed in Part I, Item 1A of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010 other than as set forth in the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2011.


*Item 2.*		*UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS*

	(a)		None


	(b)		Not applicable.


	(c)		The table below sets forth the number of shares repurchased by the registrant during the second quarter of 2011 and the average prices at which these shares were repurchased.


					Total Number of		Maximum Number
					Shares Purchased		of Shares that May
			Average Price		as Part of Publicly		Yet Be Purchased
	Total Shares		Paid per		Announced Plans		under the Plans
	Purchased		Share		or Programs		or Programs

April 1 – April 30, 2011		—		—		—		—
May 1 – May 31, 2011		—		—		—		—
June 1 – June 30, 2011		2,336	$	40.25		—		—


*Item 3.*		*DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES*

(a)

None

(b)

Not applicable


*Item 4.*		*(REMOVED AND RESERVED)*


*Item 5.*		*OTHER INFORMATION*

None


*Item 6.*		*EXHIBITS*

Exhibits


	31.1			Certification of the Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

	31.2			Certification of the Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

	32.1			Certification of the Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

	32.2			Certification of the Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

	101			Interactive Data File.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.


	WILSON BANK HOLDING COMPANY (Registrant)
DATE: August 8, 2011	/s/ Randall Clemons
	Randall Clemons
	President and Chief Executive Officer

DATE: August 8, 2011	/s/ Lisa Pominski
	Lisa Pominski
	Senior Vice President & Chief Financial Officer

WILSON BANK HOLDING CO - FORM 10-Q - August 8, 2011

Attached files

WILSON BANK HOLDING CO Reports

Also read