Attached files

file filename
EXCEL - IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT - LNB BANCORP INCFinancial_Report.xls
EX-32.2 - EX-32.2 - LNB BANCORP INCl43011exv32w2.htm
EX-31.1 - EX-31.1 - LNB BANCORP INCl43011exv31w1.htm
EX-32.1 - EX-32.1 - LNB BANCORP INCl43011exv32w1.htm
EX-31.2 - EX-31.2 - LNB BANCORP INCl43011exv31w2.htm
Table of Contents

 
 
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
     
þ   QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2011
OR
     
o   TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from            to
Commission file number: 0-13203
LNB Bancorp, Inc.
(Exact name of the registrant as specified on its charter)
     
Ohio
(State of Incorporation)
  34-1406303
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
     
457 Broadway, Lorain, Ohio   44052-1769
(Address of principal executive offices)   (Zip Code)
(440) 244-6000
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
Not Applicable
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)
     Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes þ No o
     Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes þ No o
     Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
             
Large accelerated filer o   Accelerated filer o   Non-accelerated filer þ (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)   Smaller reporting company o
     Indicate by checkmark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Yes o No þ
The number of common shares of the registrant outstanding on August 3, 2011 was 7,882,249.
 
 

 


 

LNB Bancorp, Inc.
Table of Contents
         
       
       
    3  
    4  
    5  
    6  
    7  
    28  
    46  
    48  
    48  
    48  
    49  
    49  
    49  
 EX-31.1
 EX-31.2
 EX-32.1
 EX-32.2
 EX-101 INSTANCE DOCUMENT
 EX-101 SCHEMA DOCUMENT
 EX-101 CALCULATION LINKBASE DOCUMENT
 EX-101 LABELS LINKBASE DOCUMENT
 EX-101 PRESENTATION LINKBASE DOCUMENT
 EX-101 DEFINITION LINKBASE DOCUMENT

2


Table of Contents

Part I — FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements.
Consolidated Balance Sheets
                 
    June 30, 2011     December 31, 2010  
    (unaudited)          
    (Dollars in thousands except share amounts)  
ASSETS
               
Cash and due from banks (Note 3)
  $ 26,463     $ 17,370  
Federal funds sold and interest bearing deposits in banks
    6,018       31,198  
 
           
Cash and cash equivalents
    32,481       48,568  
Securities available for sale, at fair value (Note 5)
    231,025       221,725  
Restricted stock
    5,741       5,741  
Loans held for sale
    1,308       5,105  
Loans: (Note 6)
               
Portfolio loans
    830,312       812,579  
Allowance for loan losses (Note 6)
    (17,351 )     (16,136 )
 
           
Net loans
    812,961       796,443  
 
           
Bank premises and equipment, net
    9,206       9,645  
Other real estate owned
    2,277       3,119  
Bank owned life insurance
    17,495       17,146  
Goodwill, net (Note 4)
    21,582       21,582  
Intangible assets, net (Note 4)
    801       868  
Accrued interest receivable
    3,628       3,519  
Other assets
    18,839       19,076  
 
           
Total Assets
  $ 1,157,344     $ 1,152,537  
 
           
 
               
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
               
Deposits: (Note 7)
               
Demand and other noninterest-bearing
  $ 130,210     $ 115,476  
Savings, money market and interest-bearing demand
    337,569       318,434  
Time deposits
    514,258       544,616  
 
           
Total deposits
    982,037       978,526  
 
           
Short-term borrowings (Note 8)
    756       932  
Federal Home Loan Bank advances (Note 9)
    42,499       42,501  
Junior subordinated debentures (Note 10)
    16,238       16,238  
Accrued interest payable
    1,379       1,434  
Accrued taxes, expenses and other liabilities
    2,938       3,442  
 
           
Total Liabilities
    1,045,847       1,043,073  
 
           
Shareholders’ Equity
               
Preferred stock, Series A Voting, no par value, authorized 150,000 shares, none issued at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010.
           
Preferred stock, Series B, no par value, $1,000 liquidation value, 25,223 shares authorized and issued at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010.
    25,223       25,223  
Discount on Series B preferred stock
    (109 )     (116 )
Warrant to purchase common stock
    146       146  
Common stock, par value $1 per share, authorized 15,000,000 shares, issued 8,212,943 shares at June 30, 2011 and 8,172,943 at December 31, 2010.
    8,213       8,173  
Additional paid-in capital
    39,507       39,455  
Retained earnings
    41,714       40,668  
Accumulated other comprehensive income
    2,895       2,007  
Treasury shares at cost, 328,194 shares at June 30, 2011 and at December 31, 2010
    (6,092 )     (6,092 )
 
           
Total Shareholders’ Equity
    111,497       109,464  
 
           
Total Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity
  $ 1,157,344     $ 1,152,537  
 
           
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

3


Table of Contents

Consolidated Statements of Income (unaudited)
                                 
    Three Months Ended June 30,     Six Months Ended June 30,  
    2011     2010     2011     2010  
    (Dollars in thousands except share and per share amounts)  
Interest and Dividend Income
                               
Loans
  $ 10,523     $ 10,580     $ 21,039     $ 21,372  
Securities:
                               
U.S. Government agencies and corporations
    1,612       2,070       3,089       4,206  
State and political subdivisions
    257       245       513       491  
Trading securities
                      49  
Other debt and equity securities
    71       69       143       130  
Federal funds sold and interest on deposits in banks
    9       11       23       20  
 
                       
Total interest and dividend income
    12,472       12,975       24,807       26,268  
Interest Expense
                               
Deposits
    2,204       2,745       4,487       5,725  
Federal Home Loan Bank advances
    261       316       527       634  
Short-term borrowings
    1       1       2       2  
Junior subordinated debentures
    170       216       341       431  
 
                       
Total interest expense
    2,636       3,278       5,357       6,792  
 
                       
Net Interest Income
    9,836       9,697       19,450       19,476  
Provision for Loan Losses (Note 6)
    3,345       2,109       5,445       4,218  
 
                       
Net interest income after provision for loan losses
    6,491       7,588       14,005       15,258  
Noninterest Income
                               
Investment and trust services
    470       563       873       1,008  
Deposit service charges
    1,000       1,094       1,916       2,033  
Other service charges and fees
    819       826       1,725       1,620  
Income from bank owned life insurance
    175       173       349       344  
Other income
    41       69       120       162  
 
                       
Total fees and other income
    2,505       2,725       4,983       5,167  
Securities gains, net
    88             500       38  
Gains on sale of loans
    238       195       417       387  
Loss on sale of other assets, net
    (27 )     (24 )     (25 )     (45 )
 
                       
Total noninterest income
    2,804       2,896       5,875       5,547  
Noninterest Expense
                               
Salaries and employee benefits
    4,072       3,911       8,163       7,829  
Furniture and equipment
    798       917       1,478       1,850  
Net occupancy
    588       581       1,200       1,196  
Professional fees
    445       595       931       1,148  
Marketing and public relations
    275       326       546       572  
Supplies, postage and freight
    289       302       561       644  
Telecommunications
    169       211       384       423  
Ohio franchise tax
    298       281       596       562  
FDIC assessments
    399       557       973       1,085  
Other real estate owned
    207       71       797       152  
Electronic banking expenses
    223       238       432       422  
Loan and collection expense
    310       450       752       773  
Other expense
    449       518       898       995  
 
                       
Total noninterest expense
    8,522       8,958       17,711       17,651  
 
                       
Income before income tax expense
    773       1,526       2,169       3,154  
Income tax expense
    61       283       327       580  
 
                       
Net Income
  $ 712     $ 1,243     $ 1,842     $ 2,574  
 
                       
Dividends and accretion on preferred stock
    318       318       637       637  
 
                       
Net Income Available to Common Shareholders
  $ 394     $ 925     $ 1,205     $ 1,937  
 
                       
 
                               
Net Income Per Common Share (Note 2)
                               
Basic
  $ 0.05     $ 0.12     $ 0.15     $ 0.26  
Diluted
    0.05       0.12       0.15       0.26  
Dividends declared
    0.01       0.01       0.02       0.02  
Average Common Shares Outstanding
                               
Basic
    7,884,749       7,363,161       7,878,119       7,343,023  
Diluted
    7,884,934       7,363,161       7,878,224       7,343,023  
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements

4


Table of Contents

Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’ Equity (unaudited)
                                                                 
    Preferred                                     Accumulated              
    Stock     Warrant to             Additional             Other              
    (Net of     Purchase     Common     Paid-In     Retained     Comprehensive     Treasury        
    Discount)     Common Stock     Stock     Capital     Earnings     Income     Stock     Total  
    (Dollars in thousands except share and per share amounts)  
Balance, January 1, 2010
  $ 25,092     $ 146     $ 7,624     $ 37,862     $ 36,883     $ 2,626     $ (6,092 )   $ 104,141  
Comprehensive income:
                                                               
Net Income
                                    2,574                       2,574  
Other comprehensive income, net of tax:
                                                               
Change in unrealized gains and losses on securities
                                            1,160               1,160  
 
                                                             
Total comprehensive income
                                                            3,734  
Share-based compensation
                            42                               42  
Restricted shares granted (67,498 shares)
                    67       (67 )                              
Preferred dividends and accretion of discount
    7                               (637 )                     (630 )
Common dividends declared, $.02 per share
                                    (148 )                     (148 )
 
                                               
 
                                                               
Balance, June 30, 2010
  $ 25,099     $ 146     $ 7,691     $ 37,837     $ 38,672     $ 3,786     $ (6,092 )   $ 107,139  
 
                                                               
Balance, January 1, 2011
  $ 25,107     $ 146     $ 8,173     $ 39,455     $ 40,668     $ 2,007     $ (6,092 )   $ 109,464  
Comprehensive income:
                                                               
Net Income
                                    1,842                       1,842  
Other comprehensive income, net of tax:
                                                               
Change in unrealized gains and losses on securities
                                            888               888  
 
                                                             
Total comprehensive income
                                                            2,730  
Share-based compensation
                            92                               92  
Restricted shares granted (40,000 shares)
                    40       (40 )                             -  
Preferred dividends and accretion of discount
    7                               (637 )                     (630 )
Common dividends declared, $.02 per share
                                    (159 )                     (159 )
 
                                               
Balance, June 30, 2011
  $ 25,114     $ 146     $ 8,213     $ 39,507     $ 41,714     $ 2,895     $ (6,092 )   $ 111,497  
 
                                               
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements

5


Table of Contents

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (unaudited)
                 
    Six Months Ended June 30,  
    2011     2010  
    (Dollars in thousands)  
Operating Activities
               
Net income
  $ 1,842     $ 2,574  
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
               
Provision for loan losses
    5,445       4,218  
Depreciation and amortization
    636       727  
Amortization of premiums and discounts
    675       829  
Amortization of intangibles
    67       67  
Amortization of loan servicing rights
    26       98  
Amortization of deferred loan fees and costs
    (140 )     37  
Federal deferred income tax expense (benefit)
    637       (844 )
Securities gains, net
    (500 )     (38 )
Share-based compensation
    92       42  
Loans originated for sale
    (35,116 )     (38,075 )
Proceeds from sales of loan originations
    39,330       40,330  
Net gain from loan sales
    (417 )     (387 )
Net loss on sale of other assets
    25       45  
Net decrease (increase) in accrued interest receivable and other assets
    (1,339 )     3,276  
Net decrease in accrued interest payable, taxes and other liabilities
    (560 )     (1,275 )
 
           
Net cash provided by operating activities
    10,703       11,624  
 
           
Investing Activities
               
Proceeds from sales of available-for-sale securities
    24,664       4,170  
Proceeds from maturities of available-for-sale securities
    23,826       41,368  
Purchase of available-for-sale securities
    (56,621 )     (41,091 )
Proceeds from maturities of trading securities
          436  
Proceeds from sale of trading securities
          7,338  
Purchase of Federal Reserve Bank Stock
          (756 )
Net (increase) decrease in loans made to customers
    (23,843 )     3,155  
Proceeds from the sale of other real estate owned
    2,837       117  
Purchase of bank premises and equipment
    (197 )     (276 )
 
           
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities
    (29,334 )     14,461  
Financing Activities
               
Net increase (decrease) in demand and other noninterest-bearing
    14,734       (2,816 )
Net increase in savings, money market and interest-bearing demand
    19,135       2,515  
Net increase (decrease) in time deposits
    (30,358 )     2,758  
Net increase (decrease) in short-term borrowings
    (175 )     268  
Proceeds from Federal Home Loan Bank advances
    15,000       30,000  
Payment of Federal Home Loan Bank advances
    (15,003 )     (30,002 )
Dividends paid
    (789 )     (778 )
 
           
Net cash provided by financing activities
    2,544       1,945  
 
           
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
    (16,087 )     28,030  
Cash and cash equivalents, January 1
    48,568       26,946  
 
           
Cash and cash equivalents, June 30
  $ 32,481     $ 54,976  
 
           
Supplemental cash flow information
               
Interest paid
  $ 5,412     $ 6,930  
Income taxes paid
    610        
Loans transferred to other real estate owned
    2,295       1,366  
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements

6


Table of Contents

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in thousands except per share amounts)
(1) Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
     Basis of Presentation
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of LNB Bancorp, Inc. (the “Corporation”) and its primary wholly-owned subsidiary, The Lorain National Bank (the “Bank”). The consolidated financial statements also include the accounts of North Coast Community Development Corporation, which is a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Bank. All intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated in consolidation.
The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements were prepared in accordance with instructions for Form 10-Q and, therefore, do not include information or footnote disclosures necessary for a complete presentation of financial position, results of operations and cash flows in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“US GAAP”). Accordingly, these financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto of the Corporation included in the Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010. However, all adjustments (consisting only of normal recurring accruals) which, in the opinion of the Corporation’s management (“Management”), are necessary for a fair presentation of the consolidated financial statements have been included. The results of operations for the six month period ended June 30, 2011, are not necessarily indicative of the results which may be expected for a full year.
     Use of Estimates
LNB Bancorp Inc. prepares its financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), which requires Management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Areas involving the use of Management’s estimates and assumptions include the allowance for loan losses, the valuation of goodwill, the realization of deferred tax assets, fair values of certain securities, mortgage servicing rights, net periodic pension expense, and accrued pension costs recognized in the Corporation’s consolidated financial statements. Estimates that are more susceptible to change in the near term include the allowance for loan losses and the fair value of certain assets and liabilities.
     Segment Information
The Corporation’s activities are considered to be a single industry segment for financial reporting purposes. LNB Bancorp, Inc. is a financial holding company engaged in the business of commercial and retail banking, investment management and trust services with operations conducted through its main office and banking centers located throughout Lorain, Erie, Cuyahoga, and Summit counties of Ohio. This market provides the source for substantially all of the Bank’s deposit, loan and trust activities. The majority of the Bank’s income is derived from a diverse base of commercial, mortgage and retail lending activities and investments.
     Statement of Cash Flows
For purposes of reporting in the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, cash and cash equivalents include currency on hand, amounts due from banks, Federal funds sold, and securities purchased under resale agreements. Generally, Federal funds sold and securities purchased under resale agreements are for one day periods.
     Securities
Securities that are bought and held for the sole purpose of being sold in the near term are deemed trading securities with any related unrealized gains and losses reported in earnings. As of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the Corporation did not hold any trading securities. Securities that the Corporation has a positive intent and ability to hold to maturity are classified as held to maturity. As of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, LNB Bancorp, Inc. did not hold any securities classified as held to maturity. Securities that are not classified as trading or held to maturity are classified as available for sale. Securities classified as available for sale are carried at their fair value with unrealized gains and losses, net of tax, included as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income. Interest and dividends on securities, including amortization of premiums and accretion of discounts using the effective interest method over the period to maturity or call, are included in interest income.
Management evaluates securities for other-than-temporary impairment (“OTTI”) on a quarterly basis, and more frequently when economic or market conditions warrant such an evaluation. When evaluating investment securities,

7


Table of Contents

consideration is given to the length of time and the extent to which the fair value has been less than cost, the financial condition and near-term prospects of the issuer, whether the market decline was affected by macroeconomic conditions and whether the Corporation has the intent to sell the debt security or more likely than not will be required to sell the debt security before its anticipated recovery. In analyzing an issuer’s financial condition, the Corporation may consider whether the securities are issued by the federal government or its agencies, or U.S. Government sponsored enterprises, whether downgrades by bond rating agencies have occurred, and the results of reviews of the issuer’s financial condition. The assessment of whether an other-than-temporary decline exists involves a high degree of subjectivity and judgment and is based on the information available to Management at a point in time.
When OTTI occurs, the amount of the OTTI recognized in earnings depends on whether the Corporation intends to sell the security or it is more likely than not it will be required to sell the security before recovery of its amortized cost basis. If the Corporation decides to sell or it is more likely than not that it will be required to sell the security before recovery of its amortized cost basis, the OTTI will be recognized in earnings equal to the entire difference between the investment’s amortized cost basis and its fair value at the balance sheet date. The previous amortized cost basis less the OTTI recognized in earnings becomes the new amortized cost basis of the investment. If a security is determined to be other-than-temporarily impaired, but the Corporation does not intend to sell the security, only the credit portion of the estimated loss is recognized in earnings, with the other portion of the loss recognized in other comprehensive income.
     Restricted Stock
The Bank is a member of the Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB) system. Members are required to own a certain amount of stock based on the level of borrowings and other factors, and may invest in additional amounts. The Bank is also a member of and owns stock in the Federal Reserve Bank. The Corporation also owns stock in Bankers Bancshares Inc., an institution that provides correspondent banking services to community banks. Stock in these institutions is classified as restricted stock and is recorded at redemption value which approximates fair value. The Corporation periodically evaluates the restricted stock for impairment based on ultimate recovery of par value. Both cash and stock dividends are reported as income.
     Loans Held For Sale
Held for sale loans are carried at the lower of amortized cost or estimated fair value, determined on an aggregate basis for each type of loan. Net unrealized losses are recognized by charges to income. Gains and losses on loan sales (sales proceeds minus carrying value) are recorded in the noninterest income section of the consolidated statement of income.
     Loans
Loans are reported at the principal amount outstanding, net of unearned income and premiums and discounts. Loans acquired through business combinations are valued at fair market value on or near the date of acquisition. The difference between the principal amount outstanding and the fair market valuation is amortized over the aggregate average life of each class of loan. Unearned income includes deferred fees, net of deferred direct incremental loan origination costs. Unearned income is amortized to interest income, over the contractual life of the loan, using the interest method. Deferred direct loan origination fees and costs are amortized to interest income, over the contractual life of the loan, using the interest method.
Loans are generally placed on nonaccrual status when they are 90 days past due for interest or principal or when the full and timely collection of interest or principal becomes uncertain. When a loan has been placed on nonaccrual status, the accrued and unpaid interest receivable is reversed against interest income. Placement of an account on nonaccrual status includes a reversal of all previously accrued but uncollected interest against interest income. When doubt exists as to the collectability of the principal portion of the loan, payments received must be applied to principal to the extent necessary to eliminate such doubt.
While in nonaccrual status, some or all of the cash interest payments may be treated as interest income on a cash basis as long as the remaining principal (after charge-off of identified losses, if any) is deemed to be fully collectible. The determination as to the ultimate collectability must be supported by a current, well-documented credit evaluation of the borrower’s financial condition and prospects for repayment, including consideration of the borrower’s historical repayment performance and other relevant factors. Generally, a loan is returned to accrual status when all delinquent interest and principal becomes current under the terms of the loan agreement and when the collectability is no longer doubtful.
A loan is impaired when full payment of principal and interest under the original loan terms is not expected. Impairment is evaluated in total for smaller-balance loans of similar nature such as real estate mortgages and

8


Table of Contents

installment loans, and on an individual loan basis for commercial loans that are graded substandard or below. Factors considered by Management in determining impairment include payment status, collateral value, and the probability of collecting scheduled principal and interest payments when due. Loans that experience insignificant payment delays and payment shortfalls generally are not classified as impaired. Management determines the significance of payment delays and payment shortfalls on a case-by-case basis. If a loan is impaired, a portion of the allowance may be allocated so that the loan is reported, net, at the present value of estimated future cash flows using the loan’s existing rate or at the fair value of collateral if repayment is expected solely from the collateral.
     Allowance for Loan Losses
The allowance for loan losses is Management’s estimate of credit losses inherent in the loan portfolio at the balance sheet date. Management’s determination of the allowance, and the resulting provision, is based on judgments and assumptions, including general economic conditions, loan portfolio composition, loan loss experience, Management’s evaluation of credit risk relating to pools of loans and individual borrowers, sensitivity analysis and expected loss models, value of underlying collateral, and observations of internal loan review staff or banking regulators.
The provision for loan losses is determined based on Management’s evaluation of the loan portfolio and the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses under current economic conditions and such other factors which, in Management’s judgment, deserve current recognition. Additional information can be found in Note 6 (Loans and Allowance for Loan Losses).
     Servicing
Servicing assets are recognized as separate assets when rights are acquired through sale of financial assets. Capitalized servicing rights are reported in other assets and are amortized into noninterest income in proportion to, and over the period of, the estimated future net servicing income of the underlying financial assets. Servicing assets are evaluated for impairment on a quarterly basis based upon the fair value of the rights as compared to amortized cost. Impairment is determined by stratifying rights by predominant characteristics, such as interest rates and terms. Fair value is determined using prices for similar assets with similar characteristics, when available, or based upon discounted cash flows using market-based assumptions. Impairment is recognized through a valuation allowance for an individual stratum, to the extent that fair value is less than the capitalized amount for the stratum.
     Bank Premises and Equipment
Bank premises and equipment are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation and amortization. Depreciation and amortization are computed generally on the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets. Upon the sale or other disposition of assets, the cost and related accumulated depreciation are retired and the resulting gain or loss is recognized. Maintenance and repairs are charged to expense as incurred, while renewals and improvements are capitalized. Software costs related to externally developed systems are capitalized at cost less accumulated amortization. Amortization is computed on the straight-line method over the estimated useful life.
     Goodwill and Core Deposit Intangibles
Intangible assets arise from acquisitions and include goodwill and core deposit intangibles. Goodwill is the excess of purchase price over the fair value of identified net assets in acquisitions. Core deposit intangibles represent the value of depositor relationships purchased. Goodwill is tested at least annually for impairment or whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable. The Corporation tests for goodwill impairment annually as of November 30th of each year. Core deposit intangible assets are amortized using the straight-line method over ten years and are subject to annual impairment testing.
     Other Real Estate Owned
Other real estate owned (OREO) is comprised of property acquired through a foreclosure proceeding or acceptance of a deed-in-lieu of foreclosure, and loans classified as in-substance foreclosure. Other real estate owned is recorded at the lower of the recorded investment in the loan at the time of acquisition or the fair value of the underlying property collateral, less estimated selling costs. Any write-down in the carrying value of a property at the time of acquisition is charged to the allowance for loan losses. Any subsequent write-downs to reflect current fair market value, as well as gains and losses on disposition and revenues and expenses incurred in maintaining such properties, are treated as period costs. Other real estate owned also includes bank premises formerly but no longer used for banking. Banking premises are transferred at the lower of carrying value or estimated fair value, less estimated selling costs.

9


Table of Contents

     Split-Dollar Life Insurance
The Corporation recognizes a liability and related compensation costs for endorsement split-dollar life insurance policies that provide a benefit to certain employees extending to post-retirement periods. Based on the present value of expected future cash flows, the liability is recognized based on the substantive agreement with the employee.
     Investment and Trust Services Assets and Income
Property held by the Corporation in fiduciary or agency capacity for its customers is not included in the Corporation’s financial statements as such items are not assets of the Corporation. Income from the Investment and Trust Services Division is reported on an accrual basis.
     Income Taxes
The Corporation and its wholly-owned subsidiary file an annual consolidated Federal income tax return. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be removed or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date. A valuation allowance is recorded when necessary to reduce deferred tax assets to amounts which are deemed more likely than not to be realized.
     Comprehensive Income
Comprehensive income consists of net income and other comprehensive income. Other comprehensive income includes unrealized gains and losses on securities available for sale and changes in the funded status of the pension plan, which are also recognized as separate components of shareholders’ equity.
Unrealized gains on the Corporation’s available-for-sale securities (after applicable income tax expense) totaling $4,366 and $3,479 at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively, and the minimum pension liability adjustment (after applicable income tax benefit) totaling $1,472 for both June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 are included in accumulated other comprehensive income.
     Preferred Stock
The Corporation is authorized to issue up to 1,000,000 shares of Voting Preferred Stock, no par value. As of June 30, 2011, the Corporation had authorized 150,000 Series A Voting Preferred Shares. No Series A Voting Preferred Shares have been issued.
As of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, 25,223 shares of the Corporation’s Fixed Rate Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock, Series B (“Series B preferred stock”) have been issued. The Board of Directors of the Corporation is authorized to provide for the issuance of one or more series of Voting Preferred Stock and establish the dividend rate, dividend dates, whether dividends are cumulative, liquidation prices, redemption rights and prices, sinking fund requirements, conversion rights, and restrictions on the issuance of any series of Voting Preferred Stock. The Voting Preferred Stock may be issued with conversion rights to common stock and may rank prior to the common stock in dividends, liquidation preferences, or both. In connection with the Corporation’s sale of $25.2 million of its Series B preferred stock to the U.S. Treasury in conjunction with the Capital Purchase Program, the Corporation also issued a warrant to purchase 561,343 of its common shares at an exercise price of $6.74.
     New Accounting Pronouncements
ASC Topic 310: Disclosures about the Credit Quality of Financing Receivables and the Allowance for Credit Losses. On April 5, 2011, the FASB issued a final standard to assist creditors in determining whether a modification of the terms of a receivable meets the definition of a troubled debt restructuring (TDR). The final standard, Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2011-02, “Receivables (Topic 310): A Creditor’s Determination of Whether a Restructuring Is a Troubled Debt Restructuring,” was issued as a result of stakeholders questioning whether additional guidance or clarification was needed to assist creditors with determining whether a modification is a TDR. The final standard does not change the long-standing guidance that a restructuring of a debt constitutes a TDR “if the creditor for economic or legal reasons related to the debtor’s financial difficulties grants a concession to the debtor that it would not otherwise consider.” In other words, the creditor must conclude that both the restructuring constitutes a concession, and the debtor is experiencing financial difficulties. The new guidance will be effective for interim and annual periods beginning on or after June 15, 2011, and should be applied retrospectively to restructurings occurring on or after the beginning of the fiscal year of adoption. See Note 6, Loans and Allowance for Loan Losses, for additional information.

10


Table of Contents

ASC Topic 220: Comprehensive Income: Presentation of Comprehensive Income. On June 16, 2011, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) 2011-05. This ASU is intended to increase the prominence of other comprehensive income in financial statements. The new guidance does not change whether items are reported in net income or in other comprehensive income or whether and when items of other comprehensive income are reclassified to net income. ASU 2011-05 eliminates the option in current U.S. generally accepted accounting principles that permits the presentation of other comprehensive income in the statement of changes in equity. The new guidance in the ASU requires that an entity report comprehensive income in either a single continuous statement that presents the components of net income or a separate but consecutive statement. The new guidance is to be applied retrospectively. For public entities, the amendments are effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2011. The adoption of this pronouncement is not expected to have a material impact on the Corporation’s financial statements.
     Reclassification
Certain amounts appearing in the prior year’s financial statements have been reclassified to conform to the current period’s financial statements.
(2) Earnings Per Share
Basic earnings per share are computed by dividing income available to common shareholders by the weighted average number of shares outstanding during the year. Diluted earnings per share is computed based on the weighted average number of shares outstanding plus the effects of dilutive stock options and warrants outstanding during the year. Basic and diluted earnings per share are calculated as follows:
                                 
    Three Months Ended June 30,     Six Months Ended June 30,  
    2011     2010     2011     2010  
    (Dollars in thousands except per share amounts)  
Weighted average shares outstanding used in Basic Earnings per Common Share
    7,884,749       7,363,161       7,878,119       7,343,023  
Dilutive effect of incentive stock options and warrants
    185             105        
 
                       
Weighted average shares outstanding used in Diluted Earnings Per Common Share
    7,884,934       7,363,161       7,878,224       7,343,023  
 
                       
 
Net Income
  $ 712     $ 1,243     $ 1,842     $ 2,574  
Dividends and accretion on preferred stock
    318       318       637       637  
 
                       
Income Available to Common Shareholders
  $ 394     $ 925     $ 1,205     $ 1,937  
 
                       
Basic Earnings Per Common Share
  $ 0.05     $ 0.12     $ 0.15     $ 0.26  
 
                       
Diluted Earnings Per Common Share
  $ 0.05     $ 0.12     $ 0.15     $ 0.26  
 
                       
Options for 197,000 common shares and common stock warrants for 561,343 shares were considered in computing diluted earnings per common share for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2011. Stock options for 2,500 common shares were considered dilutive and the remaining stock options and the stock warrants were antidilutive for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2011. Stock options for 198,000 common shares and common stock warrants of 561,343 were considered in computing diluted earnings per common share for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2010. All stock options and warrants were antidilutive for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2010.
(3) Cash and Due from Banks
Federal Reserve Board regulations require the Bank to maintain reserve balances on deposits with the Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland. The required ending reserve balance was $933 on June 30, 2011 and $1,195 on December 31, 2010.

11


Table of Contents

(4) Goodwill and Intangible Assets
The Corporation has goodwill of $21,582 primarily from an acquisition completed in 2007. The Corporation assesses goodwill for impairment annually and more frequently in certain circumstances. Goodwill is assessed using the Bank as the reporting unit. The Corporation considers several methodologies in determining the fair value of the reporting unit, including the discounted estimated future net cash flows, price to tangible book value, and core deposit premium values. Primary reliance is placed on the discounted estimated future net cash flow approach. The key assumptions used to determine the fair value of the Corporation subsidiary include: (a) cash flow period of 5 years; (b) capitalization rate of 10.0%; and (c) a discount rate of 13.0%, which is based on the Corporation’s average cost of capital adjusted for the risk associated with its operations. A variance in these assumptions could have a significant effect on the determination of goodwill impairment. The Corporation cannot predict the occurrences of certain future events that might adversely affect the reported value of goodwill. Such events include, but are not limited to, strategic decisions in response to economic and competitive conditions, the effect of the economic environment on the Corporation’s customer base or a material negative change in the relationship with significant customers.
Core deposit intangibles are amortized over their estimated useful life of 10 years. A summary of core deposit intangible assets follows:
                 
    June 30, 2011     December 31, 2010  
    (Dollars in thousands)  
Core deposit intangibles
  $ 1,367     $ 1,367  
Less: accumulated amortization
    566       499  
 
           
Carrying value of core deposit intangibles
  $ 801     $ 868  
 
           
(5) Securities
The amortized cost, gross unrealized gains and losses and fair values of securities available for sale at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 is as follows:
                                 
    At June 30, 2011  
    Amortized     Unrealized     Unrealized     Fair  
    Cost     Gains     Losses     Value  
            (Dollars in thousands)          
Securities available for sale:
                               
U.S. Government agencies and corporations
  $ 63,152     $ 187     $ (6 )   $ 63,333  
Mortgage backed securities
    105,213       4,518             109,731  
Collateralized mortgage obligations
    32,323       916             33,239  
State and political subdivisions
    23,721       1,043       (42 )     24,722  
 
                       
Total securities available for sale
  $ 224,409     $ 6,664     $ (48 )   $ 231,025  
 
                       
                                 
    At December 31, 2010  
    Amortized     Unrealized     Unrealized     Fair  
    Cost     Gains     Losses     Value  
            (Dollars in thousands)          
Securities available for sale:
                               
U.S. Government agencies and corporations
  $ 56,239     $ 511     $ (682 )   $ 56,068  
Mortgage backed securities
    91,793       4,128       (30 )     95,891  
Collateralized mortgage obligations
    44,297       1,249       (27 )     45,519  
State and political subdivisions
    24,125       522       (400 )     24,247  
 
                       
Total Securities available for sale
  $ 216,454     $ 6,410     $ (1,139 )   $ 221,725  
 
                       
The carrying value of securities pledged to secure trust deposits, public deposits, line of credit, and for other purposes required by law amounted to $148,535 and $152,079 at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 respectively.

12


Table of Contents

The amortized cost and fair value of the debt securities portfolio are shown by expected maturity. Expected maturities may differ from contractual maturities if issuers have the right to call or prepay obligations with or without call or prepayment penalties. U.S. Government agencies and corporations include callable and bullet agency issues and agency-backed mortgage backed securities. Mortgage backed securities and collateralized mortgage obligations are not due at a single maturity date and are shown separately.
                 
    At June 30, 2011  
    (Dollars in thousands)  
    Amortized     Fair  
    Cost     Value  
Securities available for sale:
               
Due in one year or less
  $     $  
Due from one year to five years
    25,834       26,137  
Due from five years to ten years
    21,895       22,597  
Due after ten years
    39,144       39,320  
Mortgage backed securities and collateralized mortgage obligations
    137,536       142,971  
 
           
Total
  $ 224,409     $ 231,025  
 
           
Realized gains and losses related to securities available-for-sale at June 30, 2011 and 2010 is as follows:
                 
    (Dollars in thousands)  
Gross realized gains
  $ 500     $ 138  
Gross realized losses
          (100 )
 
           
Net securities gains
  $ 500     $ 38  
 
           
Proceeds from the sale of available for sale securities
  $ 24,664     $ 4,170  
 
           
The securities portfolio contained $5,590 and $6,721 in non-rated securities of state and political subdivisions at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively. Based upon yield, term to maturity and market risk, the fair value of these securities was estimated to be $5,824 and $6,784 at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively. Management reviewed these non-rated securities and has determined that there was no other-than-temporary impairment to their value at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010.
The following is a summary of securities that had unrealized losses at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010. The information is presented for securities that have been in an unrealized loss position for less than 12 months and for more than 12 months. At June 30, 2011 there were 11 securities with unrealized losses totaling $48 and at December 31, 2010, the Corporation held 33 securities with unrealized losses totaling $1,139. Factors that are temporary in nature may result in securities being valued at less than amortized cost. For example, when the current levels of interest rates offered on securities are higher compared to the coupon interest rates on the securities held by the Corporation or when impairment is not due to credit deterioration, securities will be valued at less than amortized cost. The Corporation has the ability and the intent to hold these securities until their value recovers.
                                                 
    At June 30, 2011  
    Less than 12 months     12 months or longer     Total  
    Fair Value     Unrealized Losses     Fair Value     Unrealized Losses     Fair Value     Unrealized Losses  
                    (Dollars in thousands)                  
U.S. Government agencies and corporations
  $ 19,986     $ (6 )   $     $     $ 19,986     $ (6 )
State and political subdivisions
    2,700       (42 )                 2,700       (42 )
 
                                   
Total
  $ 22,686     $ (48 )   $     $     $ 22,686     $ (48 )
 
                                   

13


Table of Contents

                                                 
    At December 31, 2010  
    Less than 12 months     12 months or longer     Total  
            Unrealized             Unrealized             Unrealized  
    Fair Value     Losses     Fair Value     Losses     Fair Value     Losses  
                    (Dollars in thousands)                  
U.S. Government agencies and corporations
  $ 29,352     $ (682 )   $     $     $ 29,352     $ (682 )
Mortgage backed securities
    14,617       (30 )                 14,617       (30 )
Collateralized mortgage obligations
    10,027       (27 )                 10,027       (27 )
State and political subdivisions
    1,633       (400 )                 1,633       (400 )
 
                                   
Total
  $ 55,629     $ (1,139 )   $     $     $ 55,629     $ (1,139 )
 
                                   
(6) Loans and Allowance for Loan Losses
The allowance for loan losses is maintained by the Corporation at a level considered by Management to be adequate to cover probable credit losses inherent in the loan portfolio. The amount of the provision for loan losses charged to operating expenses is the amount necessary, in the estimation of Management, to maintain the allowance for loan losses at an adequate level. While Management’s periodic analysis of the allowance for loan losses may dictate portions of the allowance be allocated to specific problem loans, the entire amount is available for any loan charge-offs that may occur. Loan losses are charged off against the allowance when Management believes that the full collectability of the loan is unlikely. Recoveries of amounts previously charged-off are credited to the allowance.
The allowance is comprised of a general allowance and a specific allowance for identified problem loans. The general allowance is determined by applying estimated loss factors to the credit exposures from outstanding loans. The methodology applies to the Corporation’s total loan portfolio including the performing portion of commercial and commercial real estate loans, real estate, and all types of other loans. The loss factors are applied accordingly on a portfolio basis. Loss factors are based on the Corporation’s historical loss experience and are reviewed for appropriateness on a quarterly basis, along with other factors affecting the collectability of the loan portfolio. These other factors include but are not limited to: changes in lending policies and procedures, including underwriting standards and collection, charge-off and recovery practices; changes in national and local economic and business conditions, including the condition of various market segments; changes in the nature and volume of the portfolio; changes in the experience, ability, and depth of lending management and staff; changes in the volume and severity of past due and classified loans, the volume of nonaccrual loans, troubled debt restructurings and other loan modifications; the existence and effect of any concentrations of credit, and changes in the level of such concentrations; and the effect of external factors, such as legal and regulatory requirements, on the level of estimated credit losses in the Corporation’s current portfolio. Specific allowances are established for all impaired loans when Management has determined that, due to identified significant conditions, it is probable that a loss will be incurred.
Activity in the loan balances and the allowance for loan losses by segment at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 are summarized as follows:
                                                         
            Commercial             Home                    
June 30, 2011   Commercial     Real Estate     Residential     Equity Loans     Indirect     Consumer     Total  
                    (Dollars in thousands)                  
Allowance for loan losses:
                                                       
 
Balance, beginning of period
  $ 1,317     $ 11,127     $ 805     $ 1,512     $ 904     $ 471     $ 16,136  
Losses charged off
    (224 )     (2,092 )     (1,026 )     (686 )     (338 )     (245 )     (4,611 )
Recoveries
    35       216       10       2       72       46       381  
Provision charged to expense
    54       2,430       1,460       1,063       283       155       5,445  
 
                                         
Balance, end of period
  $ 1,182     $ 11,681     $ 1,249     $ 1,891     $ 921     $ 427     $ 17,351  
 
                                         
 
                                                       
Ending allowance balance attributable to loans:
                                                       
Individually evaluated for impairment
  $ 166     $ 5,602     $ 302     $     $     $     $ 6,070  
Collectively evaluated for impairment
    1,016       6,079       947       1,891       921       427       11,281  
 
                                         
Total ending allowance balance
  $ 1,182     $ 11,681     $ 1,249     $ 1,891     $ 921     $ 427     $ 17,351  
 
                                         
 
                                                       
Loans:
                                                       
Individually evaluated for impairment
  $ 771     $ 35,349     $ 2,126     $     $     $     $ 38,246  
Collectively evaluated for impairment
    71,908       351,542       66,711       130,143       158,885       12,877       792,066  
 
                                         
Total ending loans balance
  $ 72,679     $ 386,891     $ 68,837     $ 130,143     $ 158,885     $ 12,877     $ 830,312  
 
                                         

14


Table of Contents

                                                         
            Commercial             Home                    
December 31, 2010   Commercial     Real Estate     Residential     Equity Loans     Indirect     Consumer     Total  
                            (Dollars in thousands)                          
Allowance for loan losses:
                                                       
 
Balance, beginning of year
  $ 862     $ 14,390     $ 528     $ 1,591     $ 799     $ 622     $ 18,792  
Losses charged off
    (1,507 )     (8,508 )     (1,491 )     (1,091 )     (455 )     (573 )     (13,625 )
Recoveries
    157       87       30       39       293       138       744  
Provision charged to expense
    1,805       5,158       1,738       973       267       284       10,225  
 
                                         
Balance, end of year
  $ 1,317     $ 11,127     $ 805     $ 1,512     $ 904     $ 471     $ 16,136  
 
                                         
 
                                                       
Ending allowance balance attributable to loans:
                                                       
Individually evaluated for impairment
  $ 206     $ 6,865     $ 46     $     $     $     $ 7,117  
Collectively evaluated for impairment
    1,111       4,262       759       1,512       904       471       9,019  
 
                                         
Total ending allowance balance
  $ 1,317     $ 11,127     $ 805     $ 1,512     $ 904     $ 471     $ 16,136  
 
                                         
 
                                                       
Loans:
                                                       
Individually evaluated for impairment
  $ 1,333     $ 38,853     $ 4,482     $     $     $     $ 44,668  
Collectively evaluated for impairment
    64,329       336,950       70,203       132,536       150,031       13,862       767,911  
 
                                         
Total ending loans balance
  $ 65,662     $ 375,803     $ 74,685     $ 132,536     $ 150,031     $ 13,862     $ 812,579  
 
                                         
Delinquencies
Delinquencies are a sign of weakness in credit quality. Lending staff at the Corporation monitor the financial performance and delinquency of borrowers in its portfolios. Lenders are responsible for managing delinquencies by following up with borrowers and arranging for payments. The Corporation determines if a commercial or commercial real estate loan is delinquent based on the number of days past due according to the contractual terms of the loan. For residential, home equity and consumer loans, the Corporation considers the borrower delinquent if they are in arrears by two or more monthly payments. The following procedure is followed in managing delinquent accounts:
15-30 days past due- a collection notice is sent reminding the customer of past due status and the urgency of bringing the account current.
45 days past due- a default letter is sent declaring the loan in default and advising the customer that legal action will be necessary if the account is not brought current immediately.
60 days past due- an “attorney letter” accelerating the loan is sent advising the borrower that legal proceedings to collect the debt will begin immediately.
Management monitors delinquencies and potential problem loans on a recurring basis. At June 30, 2011 there was $36,837 in total past due loans or 4.44% of total loans compared to $36,316 or 4.48% of total loans at December 31, 2010. A table showing total loan delinquencies as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 by loan segment is as follows:
Age Analysis of Past Due Loans
as of June 30, 2011
                                                         
                                                    Recorded  
            60-89     Greater                             Investment >  
    30-59 Days     Days     than     Total                     90 Days and  
(Dollars in thousands)   Past Due     Past Due     90 Days     Past Due     Current     Total Loans     Accruing  
Commercial
  $ 232     $ 13     $ 784     $ 1,029     $ 71,650     $ 72,679     $  
Commercial Real Estate
    3,716       2,134       19,618       25,468       361,423       386,891        
Residential
    540       827       5,320       6,687       62,150       68,837        
Home Equity Loans
    609       1,184       1,133       2,926       127,217       130,143        
Indirect
    426       74       31       531       158,354       158,885          
Consumer
    82       114             196       12,681       12,877        
 
                                         
Total
  $ 5,605     $ 4,346     $ 26,886     $ 36,837     $ 793,475     $ 830,312     $  
 
                                         

15


Table of Contents

Age Analysis of Past Due Loans
as of December 31, 2010
                                                         
                                                    Recorded  
            60-89     Greater                             Investment>  
    30-59 Days     Days     than     Total Past                     90 Days and  
(Dollars in thousands)   Past Due     Past Due     90 Days     Due     Current     Total Loans     Accruing  
Commercial
  $ 31     $ 211     $ 793     $ 1,035     $ 64,627     $ 65,662     $  
Commercial Real Estate
    1,906       856       19,970       22,732       353,071       375,803        
Residential
    1,018       1,284       7,172       9,474       65,211       74,685        
Home Equity Loans
    776       235       1,130       2,141       130,395       132,536        
Indirect
    612       123       112       847       149,184       150,031          
Consumer
    61             26       87       13,775       13,862        
 
                                         
Total
  $ 4,404     $ 2,709     $ 29,203     $ 36,316     $ 776,263     $ 812,579     $  
 
                                         
Impaired Loans
     A loan is considered impaired when it is probable that not all principal and interest amounts will be collected according to the loan contract. Residential mortgage, installment and other consumer loans are evaluated collectively for impairment. Individual commercial loans are evaluated for impairment. Impaired loans are written down by the establishment of a specific allowance where necessary. Information regarding impaired loans as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 is as follows:
                                         
            Unpaid             Average     Interest  
    Recorded     Principal     Related     Recorded     Income  
At June 30, 2011   Investment     Balance     Allowance     Balance     Recognized  
(Dollars in thousands)                                        
With no related allowance recorded:
                                       
Commercial
  $ 252     $ 507     $     $ 368     $  
Commercial Real Estate
    9,139       14,384             10,575       171  
Residential
    1,177       1,227             1,771        
Home Equity Loans
                             
Indirect
                             
Consumer
                             
With allowance recorded:
                                       
Commercial
    519       993       166       531        
Commercial Real Estate
    26,210       29,317       5,602       26,667        
Residential
    949       949       302       662        
Home Equity Loans
                             
Indirect
                             
Consumer
                             
 
                             
Total
  $ 38,246     $ 47,377     $ 6,070     $ 40,574     $ 171  
 
                             

16


Table of Contents

                                         
            Unpaid             Average     Interest  
    Recorded     Principal     Related     Recorded     Income  
At December 31, 2010   Investment     Balance     Allowance     Balance     Recognized  
(Dollars in thousands)                                        
With no related allowance recorded:
                                       
Commercial
  $ 549     $ 549     $     $ 600     $ 16  
Commercial Real Estate
    6,393       10,367             8,643       133  
Residential
    3,102       3,432             3,211        
Home Equity Loans
                             
Indirect
                             
Consumer
                             
With allowance recorded:
                                       
Commercial
    784       1,432       206       1,143        
Commercial Real Estate
    32,460       35,483       6,865       29,946       6  
Residential
    1,380       1,416       46       1,420        
Home Equity Loans
                             
Indirect
                             
Consumer
                             
 
                             
Total
  $ 44,668     $ 52,679     $ 7,117     $ 44,963     $ 155  
 
                             
Nonaccrual loans at June 30, 2011 were $37,954, compared to $41,831 at December 31, 2010.
Loans On NonAccrual Status
                 
    June 30, 2011     December 31, 2010  
    (Dollars in thousands)  
Commercial
  $ 1,069     $ 1,333  
Commercial Real Estate
    24,532       25,941  
Residential
    8,678       11,052  
Home Equity Loans
    2,855       2,372  
Indirect
    579       667  
Consumer
    241       466  
 
           
Total Nonaccrual Loans
  $ 37,954     $ 41,831  
 
           
 
               
Percentage of nonaccrual loans to portfolio loans
    4.57 %     5.15 %
Percentage of nonaccrual loans to total assets
    3.28 %     3.63 %
Troubled Debt Restructuring
     A restructuring of a debt constitutes a troubled debt restructuring if the creditor, for economic or legal reasons related to the debtor’s financial difficulties, grants a concession to the debtor that it would not otherwise consider. That concession either stems from an agreement between the creditor and the debtor or is imposed by law or a court. The Corporation adheres to ASC 310-40, Troubled Debt Restructurings by Creditors, to determine whether a troubled debt structuring applies in a particular instance. As of June 30, 2011, the Corporation had three loans that were classified as troubled debt restructurings which totaled $2,169. As of December 31, 2010, the Corporation had one loan that was classified as a troubled debt restructuring in the amount of $636. The Corporation has allocated $123 and $0 of specific reserves to customers whose loan terms have been modified in troubled debt restructurings as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively. There are no commitments to lend additional amounts to borrowers with loans that are classified as troubled debt restructurings at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010. At June 30, 2011 the borrowers have made timely payments of principal and interest on those loans per the modified agreements.
Credit Risk Grading
     Sound credit systems, practices and procedures such as credit risk grading systems; effective credit review and examination processes; effective loan monitoring, problem identification, and resolution processes; and a conservative loss recognition process and charge-off policy are integral to Management’s proper assessment of the adequacy of the allowance. Many factors are considered when grades are assigned to individual loans such as current and historic delinquency, financial statements of the borrower, current net realizable value of collateral and

17


Table of Contents

the general economic environment and specific economic trends affecting the portfolio. Commercial, commercial real estate and residential construction loans are assigned internal credit risk grades. The loan’s internal credit risk grade is reviewed on at least an annual basis and more frequently if needed based on specific borrower circumstances. Credit quality indicators used in Management’s periodic analysis of the adequacy of the allowance include the Corporation’s internal credit risk grades which are described below and are included in the table below for June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010:
      Grades 1 -5: defined as “Pass” credits — loans which are protected by the borrower’s current net worth and paying capacity or by the value of the underlying collateral. Pass credits are current or have not displayed a significant past due history.
      Grade 6: defined as “Special Mention” credits — loans where a potential weakness or risk exists, which could cause a more serious problem if not monitored. Loans listed for special mention generally demonstrate a history of repeated delinquencies, which may indicate a deterioration of the repayment abilities of the borrower.
      Grade 7: defined as “Substandard” credits — loans that have a well-defined weakness based on objective evidence and are characterized by the distinct possibility that the Corporation will sustain some loss if the deficiencies are not corrected.
      Grade 8: defined as “Doubtful” credits — loans classified as doubtful have all the weaknesses inherent in a substandard asset. In addition, these weaknesses make collection or liquidation in full highly questionable and improbable.
      Grade 9: defined as “Loss” credits — loans classified as a loss are considered uncollectible, or of such value that continuance as an asset is not warranted.
For residential, home equity, indirect and consumer loan segments, the Corporation monitors credit quality using a combination of the delinquency status of the loan and/or the Corporation’s internal credit risk grades as indicated above.
The following table presents the recorded investment of commercial, commercial real estate and residential construction loans by internal credit risk grade and the recorded investment in residential, home equity, indirect and consumer loans based on delinquency status as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010:
                                                         
            Commercial Real             Home Equity                    
    Commercial     Estate     Residential*     Loans     Indirect     Consumer     Total  
Commercial Credit Exposure     June 30, 2011    
                            (Dollars in thousands)                          
Loans graded by internal credit risk grade:
                                                       
Grade 1 - Minimal
  $ 3,172     $     $     $     $     $     $ 3,172  
Grade 2 - Modest
                                         
Grade 3 - Better than average
    149       2,935                               3,084  
Grade 4 - Average
    8,033       52,231       264                         60,528  
Grade 5 - Acceptable
    57,590       263,494       4,054                         325,138  
 
                                         
Total Pass Credits
    68,944       318,660       4,318                         391,922  
Grade 6 - Special mention
    2,689       17,038       377                         20,104  
Grade 7 - Substandard
    1,046       51,193       1,628                         53,867  
Grade 8 - Doubtful
                                         
Grade 9 - Loss
                                         
 
                                         
Total loans internally credit risk graded
    72,679       386,891       6,323                         465,893  
Loans not monitored by internal risk grade:
                                                       
Current loans not internally risk graded
                56,657       127,217       158,354       12,681       354,909  
30-59 days past due loans not internally risk graded
                540       609       426       82       1,657  
60-89 days past due loans not internally risk graded
                827       1,184       74       114       2,199  
90+ days past due loans not internally risk graded
                4,490       1,133       31             5,654  
 
                                         
Total loans not internally credit risk graded
                62,514       130,143       158,885       12,877       364,419  
 
                                         
Total loans internally and not internally credit risk graded
  $ 72,679     $ 386,891     $ 68,837     $ 130,143     $ 158,885     $ 12,877     $ 830,312  
 
                                         

18


Table of Contents

                                                         
            Commercial             Home Equity                    
    Commercial     Real Estate     Residential*     Loans     Indirect     Consumer     Total  
Commercial Credit Exposure     December 31, 2010  
                            (Dollars in thousands)                          
Loans graded by internal credit risk grade:
                                                       
Grade 1 - Minimal
  $ 3,124     $     $     $     $     $     $ 3,124  
Grade 2 - Modest
                                         
Grade 3 - Better than average
    162       3,055                               3,217  
Grade 4 - Average
    8,343       59,651       267                         68,261  
Grade 5 - Acceptable
    49,727       246,475       5,733                         301,935  
 
                                         
Total Pass Credits
    61,356       309,181       6,000                         376,537  
Grade 6 - Special mention
    2,599       13,807       170                         16,576  
Grade 7 - Substandard
    1,707       52,815       2,516                         57,038  
Grade 8 - Doubtful
                                         
Grade 9 - Loss
                                         
 
                                         
Total loans internally credit risk graded
    65,662       375,803       8,686                         450,151  
Loans not monitored by internal risk grade:
                                                       
Current loans not internally risk graded
                57,389       130,395       149,184       13,775       350,743  
30-59 days past due loans not internally risk graded
                1,018       776       612       61       2,467  
60-89 days past due loans not internally risk graded
                1,032       235       123             1,390  
90+ days past due loans not internally risk graded
                6,560       1,130       112       26       7,828  
 
                                         
Total loans not internally credit risk graded
                65,999       132,536       150,031       13,862       362,428  
 
                                         
Total loans internally and not internally credit risk graded
  $ 65,662     $ 375,803     $ 74,685     $ 132,536     $ 150,031     $ 13,862     $ 812,579  
 
                                         
 
*   Residential loans include conventional 1-4 family residential property loans and conventional 1-4 family residential property loans used to finance the cost of construction when upon completion of construction the loan converts into a permanent mortgage.
The Corporation adheres to underwriting standards consistent with its Loan Policy for indirect and consumer loans. Final approval of a consumer credit depends on the repayment ability of the borrower. Repayment ability generally requires the determination of the borrower’s capacity to meet current and proposed debt service requirements. A borrower’s repayment ability is monitored based on delinquency, generally for time periods of 30 to 59 days past due, 60 to 89 days past due and greater than 90 days past due. This information is provided in the above delinquent loan table. Additionally, a good indicator of repayment ability is a borrower’s credit history. A borrower’s credit history is evaluated though the use of credit reports and/or an automated underwriting system. A borrower’s credit score is an indication of a person’s creditworthiness that is used to access the likelihood that a borrower will repay their debts. A credit score is generally based upon a person’s past credit history and is a number between 300 and 850 — the higher the number, the more creditworthy the person is deemed to be.
Below is a table that shows the weighted average credit scores for residential, home equity, indirect and consumer loans for the six and twelve months ended June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010.
                 
Consumer Credit Score Migration   June 30, 2011     December 31, 2010  
Total residential
    703       701  
Total home equity loans
    751       750  
Total loans to individuals
    728       728  
Total indirect
    770       771  
Total revolving lines
    713       713  

19


Table of Contents

(7) Deposits
Deposit balances at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 are summarized as follows:
                 
    June 30, 2011     December 31, 2010  
    (Dollars in thousands)  
Demand and other noninterest-bearing
  $ 130,210     $ 115,476  
Interest checking
    141,592       134,375  
Savings
    97,277       91,882  
Money market accounts
    98,700       92,177  
Consumer time deposits
    454,721       464,860  
Public time deposits
    59,537       79,756  
 
           
Total deposits
  $ 982,037     $ 978,526  
 
           
The aggregate amount of certificates of deposit in denominations of $100,000 or more amounted to $224,677 and $240,127 at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively.
The maturity distribution of certificates of deposit as of June 30, 2011 follows:
                                         
            After 12 months     After 36 months              
    Within     but within 36     but within 60              
    12 months     months     months     After 5 years     Total  
    (Dollars in thousands)
Consumer time deposits
  $ 326,776     $ 97,185     $ 30,760     $     $ 454,721  
Public time deposits
    49,659       7,347       2,531             59,537  
 
                             
Total time deposits
  $ 376,435     $ 104,532     $ 33,291     $     $ 514,258  
 
                             
(8) Short-Term Borrowings
The Corporation has a line of credit for advances and discounts with the Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland. The amount of this line of credit varies on a monthly basis. The line is equal to 50% of the balances of qualified home equity lines of credit that are pledged as collateral. At June 30, 2011, the Bank had pledged approximately $88,289 in qualifying home equity lines of credit, resulting in an available line of credit of approximately $44,145. No amounts were outstanding at June 30, 2011 or December 31, 2010. The Corporation also has a $4,000 line of credit with an unaffiliated financial institution. The balance of this line of credit was $0 as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010.
Short-term borrowings include securities sold under repurchase agreements and Federal funds purchased from correspondent banks. Securities sold under repurchase agreements at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 were $756 and $932, respectively. The interest rate paid on these borrowings was 0.25% at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010. No Federal Funds were purchased as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010.
(9) Federal Home Loan Bank Advances
Federal Home Loan Bank advances amounted to $42,499 and $42,501 at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively. All advances are bullet maturities with no call features. At June 30, 2011, collateral pledged for FHLB advances consisted of qualified real estate mortgage loans and investment securities of $56,041 and $31,252, respectively. The maximum borrowing capacity of the Bank at June 30, 2011 was $50,084 with unused collateral borrowing capacity of $6,051. The Bank maintains a $40,000 cash management line of credit (CMA) with the FHLB. The amount outstanding was $0 for the CMA line of credit as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010.
Maturities of FHLB advances outstanding at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 are as follows.

20


Table of Contents

                 
    June 30, 2011     December 31, 2010  
    (Dollars in thousands)  
Maturities January 2011 through February 2011, with fixed rates ranging from 3.17% to 3.67%
  $     $ 15,000  
Maturity January 2012, fixed rate 2.37%
    15,000       15,000  
Maturities January 2014 though August 2014, fixed rates ranging from 2.06% to 3.55%
    15,034       10,040  
Maturity January 2015 fixed rate 2.00% and July 2015, fixed rate 4.76%
    12,465       2,461  
 
           
Total FHLB advances
  $ 42,499     $ 42,501  
 
           
(10) Trust Preferred Securities
In May 2007, LNB Trust I (“Trust I”) and LNB Trust II (“Trust II”) each sold $10,000 of preferred securities to outside investors and invested the proceeds in junior subordinated debentures issued by the Corporation. The Corporation used the proceeds from the debentures to fund the cash portion of its acquisition of Morgan Bancorp, Inc. Trust I and Trust II are wholly-owned unconsolidated subsidiaries of the Corporation. The Corporation’s obligations under the transaction documents, taken together, have the effect of providing a full guarantee by the Corporation, on a subordinated basis, of the payment obligation of the Trusts.
The subordinated notes mature in 2037. Trust I bears a floating interest rate (current three-month LIBOR plus 148 basis points). Trust II bears a fixed rate of 6.64% through June 15, 2017, and then becomes a floating interest rate (current three-month LIBOR plus 148 basis points). Interest on the notes is payable quarterly. The interest rates in effect as of the last determination date in 2011 were 1.79% and 6.64% for Trust I and Trust II, respectively. At June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, accrued interest payable for Trust I was $6 and $6 and for Trust II was $22 and $30, respectively.
The subordinated notes are redeemable in whole or in part, without penalty, at the Corporation’s option on or after June 15, 2012 and mature on June 15, 2037. The notes are junior in right of payment to the prior payment in full of all Senior Indebtedness of the Corporation, whether outstanding at the date of the indenture governing the notes or thereafter incurred. At June 30, 2011, the balance of the subordinated notes payable to Trust I and Trust II were each $8,119.
In August 2010, the Corporation entered into an agreement with certain holders of its currently non-pooled trust preferred securities to exchange up to $2,125 in principal amount of the securities issued by Trust I and $2,125 in principal amount of the securities issued by Trust II for up to 525,000 newly issued shares of the Corporation’s common stock. The Corporation issued 462,234 shares of common stock at a volume-weighted average price of $4.41 per share in exchange for the $4,250 in aggregate principal amount of tendered Trust I and Trust II trust preferred securities and recorded a gain on extinguishment of debt of $2,210.
(11) Commitments, Credit Risk, and Contingencies
In the normal course of business, the Bank enters into commitments that involve off-balance sheet risk to meet the financing needs of its customers. These instruments are currently limited to commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit. Commitments to extend credit involve elements of credit risk and interest rate risk in excess of the amount recognized in the consolidated balance sheets. The Bank’s exposure to credit loss in the event of nonperformance by the other party to the commitment is represented by the contractual amount of the commitment. The Bank uses the same credit policies in making commitments as it does for on-balance sheet instruments. Interest rate risk on commitments to extend credit results from the possibility that interest rates may have moved unfavorably from the position of the Bank since the time the commitment was made.
Commitments to extend credit are agreements to lend to a customer as long as there is no violation of any condition established in the contract. Commitments generally have fixed expiration dates of 30 to 120 days or other termination clauses and may require payment of a fee. Since some of the commitments may expire without being drawn upon, the total commitment amounts do not necessarily represent future cash requirements.
The Bank evaluates each customer’s credit worthiness on a case-by-case basis. The amount of collateral obtained by the Bank upon extension of credit is based on Management’s evaluation of the applicant’s credit. Collateral held is generally single-family residential real estate and commercial real estate. Substantially all of the obligations to extend credit are variable rate. Standby letters of credit are conditional commitments issued to guarantee the

21


Table of Contents

performance of a customer to a third party. Payments under standby letters of credit generally are contingent upon the failure of the customer to perform according to the terms of the underlying contract with the third party.
A summary of the contractual amount of commitments at June 30, 2011 follows:
         
    June 30, 2011  
    (Dollars in thousands)  
Commitments to extend credit
  $ 64,818  
Home equity lines of credit
    78,354  
Standby letters of credit
    8,295  
 
     
Total
  $ 151,467  
 
     
(12) Estimated Fair Value of Financial Instruments
The Corporation discloses estimated fair values for its financial instruments. Fair value estimates, methods and assumptions are set forth below for the Corporation’s financial instruments.
The following methods and assumptions were used to estimate the fair value of each class of financial instruments for which it is practicable to estimate that value:
    The carrying value of cash and due from banks, Federal funds sold, short-term investments, interest-bearing deposits in other banks and accrued interest receivable and other financial assets is a reasonable estimate of fair value due to the short-term nature of the asset.
 
    The fair value of investment securities is based on quoted market prices, where available. If quoted market prices are not available, fair value is estimated using the quoted market prices of comparable instruments.
 
    For variable rate loans with interest rates that may be adjusted on a quarterly, or more frequent basis, the carrying amount is a reasonable estimate of fair value. The fair value of other types of loans is estimated by discounting future cash flows using the current rates at which similar loans would be made to borrowers with similar credit ratings and for the same remaining maturities.
 
    The carrying value approximates the fair value for bank owned life insurance.
 
    The fair value of deposits with no stated maturity, such as noninterest-bearing demand deposits, savings, money market, checking and interest-bearing checking, is equal to the amount payable on demand as of the balance sheet date, for each year presented. The fair value of fixed-maturity certificates of deposit is estimated using the rates currently offered for deposits of similar remaining maturities. For variable rate certificates of deposit, the carrying amount is a reasonable estimate of fair value.
 
    Securities sold under repurchase agreements, other short-term borrowings, accrued interest payable and other financial liabilities approximate fair value due to the short-term nature of the liability.
 
    The fair value of Federal Home Loan Bank advances is estimated by discounting future cash flows using current FHLB rates for the remaining term to maturity.
 
    The fair value of junior subordinated debentures is based on the discounted value of contractual cash flows using rates currently offered for similar maturities.
 
    The fair value of commitments to extend credit approximates the fees charged to make these commitments; since rates and fees of the commitment contracts approximates those currently charged to originate similar commitments. The carrying amount and fair value of off-balance sheet instruments is not significant as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010.
 
      Limitations
Estimates of fair value are made at a specific point in time, based on relevant market information and information about the financial instrument. These estimates are subjective in nature and involve uncertainties and matters of significant judgment and, therefore, cannot be determined with precision. Changes in assumptions could significantly affect the estimates.
Estimates of fair value are based on existing on-and-off balance sheet financial instruments without attempting to estimate the value of anticipated future business and the value of assets and liabilities that are not considered

22


Table of Contents

financial instruments. For example, the Corporation has a substantial Investment and Trust Services Division that contributes net fee income annually. The Investment and Trust Services Division is not considered a financial instrument and its value has not been incorporated into the fair value estimates. Other significant assets and liabilities that are not considered financial instruments include property, plant and equipment, goodwill and deferred tax liabilities. In addition, it is not practicable for the Corporation to estimate the tax ramifications related to the realization of the unrealized gains and losses and they have not been reflected in any of the estimates of fair value. The impact of these tax ramifications can have a significant effect on estimates of fair value.
The estimated fair values of the Corporation’s financial instruments at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 are summarized as follows:
                                 
    June 30, 2011     December 31, 2010  
    Carrying     Estimated Fair     Carrying     Estimated Fair  
    Value     Value     Value     Value  
            (Dollars in thousands)          
Financial assets
                               
Cash and due from banks, federal funds sold and interest-bearing deposits in banks
  $ 32,481     $ 32,481     $ 48,568     $ 48,568  
Securities
    231,025       231,025       221,725       221,725  
Portfolio loans, net
    812,961       817,541       796,443       801,585  
Loans held for sale
    1,308       1,308       5,105       5,105  
Accrued interest receivable
    3,628       3,628       3,519       3,519  
Financial liabilities
                               
Deposits:
                               
Demand, savings and money market
    467,779       467,779       433,910       433,910  
Time deposits
    514,258       520,902       544,616       551,832  
 
                       
Total deposits
    982,037       988,681       978,526       985,742  
 
                       
Short-term borrowings
    756       756       932       932  
Federal Home Loan Bank advances
    42,499       44,149       42,501       43,613  
Junior subordinated debentures
    16,238       15,949       16,238       15,746  
Accrued interest payable
    1,379       1,379       1,434       1,434  
The fair value of financial assets and liabilities is categorized in three levels. The valuation hierarchy is based upon the transparency of inputs to the valuation of an asset or liability as of the measurement date. These levels are:
   Level 1 —Valuations based on quoted prices in active markets, such as the New York Stock Exchange. Valuations are obtained from readily available pricing sources for market transactions involving identical assets or liabilities.
   Level 2 —Valuations of assets and liabilities traded in less active dealer or broker markets. Valuations include quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities traded in the same market; quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active; and model-derived valuations whose inputs are observable or whose significant value drivers are observable. Valuations may be obtained from, or corroborated by, third-party pricing services.
   Level 3 —Assets and liabilities with valuations that include methodologies and assumptions that may not be readily observable, including option pricing models, discounted cash flow models, yield curves and similar techniques. Level 3 valuations incorporate certain assumptions and projections in determining the fair value assigned to such assets or liabilities, but in all cases are corroborated by external data, which may include third-party pricing services.
In instances where inputs used to measure fair value fall into different levels in the above fair value hierarchy, fair value measurements in their entirety are categorized based on the lowest level input that is significant to the valuation. The Corporation’s assessment of the significance of particular inputs to these fair value measurements requires judgment and considers factors specific to each asset or liability.
The following information pertains to assets measured by fair value on a recurring basis (in thousands):

23


Table of Contents

                                 
            Quoted Prices in              
            Active Markets for     Significant Other     Significant  
    Fair Value as of     Identical Assets     Other Observable Inputs     Unobservable Inputs  
Description   June 30, 2011     (Level 1)     (Level 2)     (Level 3)  
(Dollars in thousands)                                
Securities available for sale:
                               
U.S. Government agencies and corporations
  $ 63,333     $     $ 63,333     $  
Mortgage backed securities
    109,731             109,731        
Collateralized mortgage obligations
    33,239             33,239        
State and political subdivisions
    24,722             24,722        
 
                       
Total
  $ 231,025     $     $ 231,025     $  
 
                       
                                 
            Quoted Prices in              
            Active Markets for     Significant Other     Significant  
    Fair Value as of     Identical Assets     Other Observable Inputs     Unobservable Inputs  
Description   December 31, 2010     (Level 1)     (Level 2)     (Level 3)  
(Dollars in thousands)                                
Securities available for sale:
                               
U.S. Government agencies and corporations
  $ 56,068     $     $ 56,068     $  
Mortgage backed securities
    95,891             95,891        
Collateralized mortgage obligations
    45,519             45,519        
State and political subdivisions
    24,247             24,247        
 
                       
Total
  $ 221,725     $     $ 221,725     $  
 
                       
There were no transfers between Levels 1 and 2 of the fair value hierarchy during the six months ended June 30, 2011. For the available for sale securities, the Corporation obtains fair value measurements from an independent third party service and or from independent brokers.
The following tables present the balances of assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010:
                                 
            Internal     Internal        
    Quoted     Models with     Models with        
    Market     Significant     Significant        
    Prices in     Observable     Unobservable        
    Active     Market     Market        
    Markets     Parameters     Parameters        
June 30, 2011   (Level 1)     (Level 2)     (Level 3)     Total  
(Dollars in thousands)                                
Impaired loans
  $     $     $ 38,246     $ 38,246  
Other real estate owned
                2,277       2,277  
Mortgage servicing rights
                    840       840  
 
                       
Total assets at fair value on a nonrecurring basis
  $     $     $ 41,363     $ 41,363  
 
                       

24


Table of Contents

                                 
            Internal     Internal        
    Quoted     Models with     Models with        
    Market     Significant     Significant        
    Prices in     Observable     Unobservable        
    Active     Market     Market        
    Markets     Parameters     Parameters        
December 31, 2011   (Level 1)     (Level 2)     (Level 3)     Total  
(Dollars in thousands)                                
Impaired loans
  $     $     $ 44,668     $ 44,668  
Other real estate owned
                3,119       3,119  
Mortgage servicing rights
                    758       758  
 
                       
Total assets at fair value on a nonrecurring basis
  $     $     $ 48,545     $ 48,545  
 
                       
The Corporation has assets that, under certain conditions, are subject to measurement at fair value on a non-recurring basis. The fair value of collateral-dependent impaired loans and other real estate owned is determined through the use of an independent third-party appraisal (Level 3 input), once a loan is identified as impaired or the Corporation takes ownership of a property. The Corporation maintains a disciplined approach of obtaining updated independent third-party appraisals relating to such loans or property on at least an annual basis, at which time the determination of fair value is updated as necessary to reflect the appraisal. In addition, Management reviews the fair value of those collateral-dependent impaired loans in amounts that it considers to be material ($250,000 or greater) on a monthly basis and makes necessary adjustments to the fair value based on individual facts and circumstances, which review may include obtaining new third-party appraisals.
Mortgage Servicing Rights (MSR). The Corporation carries its mortgage servicing rights at lower of cost or fair value, and therefore, can be subject to fair value measurements on a nonrecurring basis. Since sales of mortgage servicing rights occur in private transactions and the precise terms and conditions of the sales are typically not readily available (Level 3), there is a limited market to refer to in determining the fair value of mortgage servicing rights. As such the Corporation utilizes a third party vendor to perform a valuation on the mortgage servicing rights to estimate the fair value. The Corporation reviews the estimated fair values and assumptions used by the third party vendor on a quarterly basis.
Impaired Loans. Impaired loans valued using Level 3 inputs consist of non-homogeneous loans that are considered impaired. The Corporation estimates the fair value of these loans based on the estimated realizable values of available collateral, which is typically based on current independent third-party appraisals.
Other Real Estate Owned. Other real estate owned (“OREO”) is measured and reported at fair value when the current book value exceeds the estimated fair value of the property. Management’s determination of the fair value for these loans uses a market approach representing the estimated net proceeds to be received from the sale of the property based on observable market prices and market value provided by independent, licensed or certified appraisers (Level 3 Inputs).
(13) Share-Based Compensation
A broad-based stock option incentive plan, the 2006 Stock Incentive Plan, was adopted by the Corporation’s shareholders on April 18, 2006. As of June 30, 2011, outstanding awards granted under this Plan consisted of stock options granted in 2007, 2008 and 2009 and long-term restricted shares issued in 2010 and 2011. In addition, the Corporation has nonqualified stock option agreements outside of the 2006 Stock Incentive Plan. Grants under the nonqualified stock option agreements have been made from 2005 to 2007.
     Stock Options
The expense recorded for stock options was $0 and $9 for the first six months of June 30, 2011 and June 30, 2010, respectively. The maximum option term is ten years and the options generally vest over three years as follows: one-third after one year from the grant date, two-thirds after two years and completely after three years.

25


Table of Contents

Options outstanding at June 30, 2011 were as follows:
                                 
    Outstanding     Exercisable  
            Weighted                
            Average                
            Remaining             Weighted  
            Contractual Life             Average  
    Number     (Years)     Number     Exercise Price  
Range of Exercise Prices                          
$5.34-$5.34
    2,500       7.88       1,667     $ 5.34  
$14.47-$15.34
    82,000       6.60       82,000       14.47  
$15.35-$16.50
    52,500       5.71       52,500       15.78  
$16.51-$19.10
    30,000       4.59       30,000       19.10  
$19.11-$19.17
    30,000       3.59       30,000       19.17  
 
                           
Outstanding at end of period
    197,000       5.62       196,167     $ 16.17  
 
                           
A summary of the status of stock options at June 30, 2011 and June 30, 2010 and changes during the six months then ended is presented in the table below:
                                 
    2011     2010  
            Weighted             Weighted  
            Average Exercise             Average Exercise  
    Options     Price per Share     Options     Price per Share  
Outstanding at beginning of period
    197,000     $ 16.12       198,000     $ 16.12  
Granted
                       
Forfeited or expired
                       
Exercised
                       
Stock dividend or split
                       
 
                       
Outstanding at end of period
    197,000     $ 16.12       198,000     $ 16.12  
 
                       
Exercisable at end of period
    196,167     $ 16.17       161,996     $ 16.54  
 
                       
There were no options exercised during the first six months of 2011, therefore the total intrinsic value of options exercised was $0. The total intrinsic value of all options outstanding for the first six months of 2011 was $0.
A summary of the status of nonvested stock options at June 30, 2011 is presented in the table below:
                 
            Weighted Average  
    Nonvested     Exercise Price per  
    Shares     share  
Nonvested at January 1, 2011
    29,004     $ 13.95  
Granted
           
Vested
    28,171       14.20  
Forfeited or expired
           
Nonvested at June 30, 2011
    833       5.34  
     Restricted Shares
In January 2011, the Corporation issued 40,000 shares of long-term restricted stock at the current market price of the Corporation’s stock on the date of grant which was $5.28 per share. In 2010, the Corporation issued 86,852 shares of long-term restricted stock at a weighted average price of $4.42 per share. Shares of long-term restricted stock generally vest in two equal installments on the second and third anniversaries of the date of grant, or upon the earlier death or disability of the recipient or a qualified change of control of the Corporation. The expense recorded for long-term restricted stock for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 was $92 and $33, respectively.

26


Table of Contents

The market price of the Corporation’s common shares at the date of grant is used to estimate the fair value of restricted stock awards. A summary of the status of restricted shares at June 30, 2011 is presented in the table below:
                 
            Weighted Average
            Grant Date Fair
    Nonvested Shares   Value
Nonvested at January 1, 2011
    86,852     $ 4.42  
Granted
    40,000       5.28  
Vested
             
Forfeited or expired
           
Nonvested at June 30, 2011
    126,852       4.69  
     Stock Appreciation Rights (“SAR”)
In 2006, the Corporation issued an aggregate of 30,000 stock appreciation rights (“SAR”) at $19.00 per share, 15,500 of which have expired due to employee terminations. The SAR vest over three years as follows: one-third after one year from the grant date, two-thirds after two years and completely after three years. Any unexercised portion of the SAR shall expire at the end of the stated term which is decided at the date of grant and shall not exceed ten years. The SAR issued in 2006 will expire in January 2016. The expense recorded for SAR for the first half of 2011 and 2010 was $0.

27


Table of Contents

ITEM 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
The following commentary presents a discussion and analysis of the Corporation’s financial condition and results of operations by its management (“Management”). This Management’s Discussion and Analysis (“MD&A”) section discusses the financial condition and results of operations of the Corporation for the six months ended June 30, 2011. This MD&A should be read in conjunction with the financial information contained in the Corporation’s Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010 and in the accompanying consolidated financial statements and notes contained in this Form 10-Q. The objective of this financial review is to enhance the reader’s understanding of the accompanying tables and charts, the consolidated financial statements, notes to the financial statements and financial statistics appearing elsewhere in the report. Where applicable, this discussion also reflects Management’s insights as to known events and trends that have or may reasonably be expected to have a material effect on the Corporation’s operations and financial condition.
Summary
The Corporation is a bank holding company headquartered in Lorain, Ohio, deriving substantially all of its revenue from the Bank. The Corporation provides a range of products and services to commercial customers and the community, and currently operates 20 banking centers throughout Lorain, Erie, Cuyahoga and Summit counties in Ohio.
Net income was $712 for the second quarter of 2011. Net income available to common shareholders was $394 or $0.05 per diluted common share. This compares to net income available to common shareholders of $925 or $0.12 per diluted common share for the second quarter of 2010. Earnings per diluted common share for 2011 reflect the issuance of common shares in exchange for a portion of the Corporation’s outstanding trust preferred securities during the third quarter of 2010.
Net interest income on a fully taxable equivalent (FTE) basis for the second quarter of 2011 was $9,969, a 1.46% increase, compared to $9,826 for the second quarter of 2010. Net interest income increased $143 compared to one year ago mainly due to the effect of lower market interest rates on the funding side as well as a favorable change in the mix of average earning assets. As a result, the net interest margin improved from 3.61% for the second quarter of 2010 to 3.64% for the second quarter of 2011.
The provision for loan losses was $3,345 for the quarter ended June 30, 2011 compared to $2,109 for the quarter ended June 30, 2010.
Noninterest income in the second quarter totaled $2,804 compared to $2,896 for the second quarter of 2010. Gains on the sale of loans increased $43 for the second quarter of 2011 compared to the same period a year ago. Trust income and service charges on deposits were down from a year ago primarily as a result of the Corporation exiting the retail investment business and the negative impact of new federal regulations regarding certain bank overdraft fees and charges, respectively.
Noninterest expense was $8,522 for the second quarter of 2011, compared to $8,958 for the second quarter of 2010, a decrease of $436, or 4.87%. The decrease was driven primarily by reduced equipment expense, professional fees, FDIC assessments and loan and collection expense. Other real estate owned expenses increased as further write-downs in the valuation of properties were incurred related to the disposition of several properties. The efficiency ratio, which is a measure of the cost to generate revenue, decreased from 70.41% in the second quarter of 2010 to 66.72% in the second quarter of 2011.
During the second quarter of 2011, loan demand improved as total portfolio loans ended the quarter at $830,312, a 2.18% increase compared to $812,579 at December 31, 2010. Total assets for the second quarter ended at $1,157,344 compared to $1,152,537 at the end of 2010. Total deposits grew to $982,037 at the end of the second quarter of 2011, up from $978,526 at December 31, 2010. The growth in deposits primarily came in the form of core deposits, which improved liquidity while reducing costs.
In addition to the effect of the overall economy and the level of unemployment, a significant factor impacting asset quality has been the lower market valuation of the underlying collateral, primarily in construction and development and commercial real estate loans, and additional allowances provided as a result of these lower valuations. Given the current economic conditions, the Corporation continues to work through asset quality challenges. The Corporation’s

28


Table of Contents

non-performing loans totaled $37,954 at June 30, 2011, or 4.57% of total loans, an improvement from $41,831, or 5.15%, at December 31, 2010.
The allowance for possible loan losses was $17,351 at June 30, 2011 compared to $16,136 at December 31, 2010, equaling 2.09% of total loans at June 30, 2011 compared to 1.99% at December 31, 2010. Annualized net charge-offs to average loans for the six months ended June 30, 2011 was 1.05% compared to 1.62% for December 31, 2010.

29


Table of Contents

Table 1: Condensed Consolidated Average Balance Sheets
Interest, Rate, and Rate/ Volume differentials are stated on a Fully-Tax Equivalent (FTE) Basis.
Table 1 presents the condensed average balance sheets for the three months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010. Rates are computed on a tax equivalent basis and nonaccrual loans are included in the average loan balances.
                                                 
    Three Months Ended  
    June 30, 2011     June 30, 2010  
    Average                     Average              
    Balance     Interest     Rate     Balance     Interest     Rate  
    (Dollars in thousands)  
Assets:
                                               
U.S. Govt agencies and corporations
  $ 219,146     $ 1,612       2.95 %   $ 229,497     $ 2,070       3.62 %
State and political subdivisions
    25,282       370       5.89       23,266       355       6.11  
Federal funds sold and interest-bearing deposits in banks
    29,183       9       0.11       36,849       12       0.13  
Restricted stock
    5,741       71       4.96       5,650       69       4.90  
Commercial loans
    453,346       5,970       5.28       441,755       5,845       5.31  
Real estate mortgage loans
    61,962       852       5.51       73,262       982       5.38  
Home equity lines of credit
    109,228       1,062       3.90       109,065       1,072       3.94  
Installment loans
    195,167       2,659       5.46       170,974       2,699       6.33  
 
                                   
Total Earning Assets
  $ 1,099,055     $ 12,605       4.60 %   $ 1,090,318     $ 13,104       4.82 %
 
                                   
Allowance for loan loss
    (17,995 )                     (19,346 )                
Cash and due from banks
    23,423                       16,883                  
Bank owned life insurance
    17,380                       16,668                  
Other assets
    53,112                       54,455                  
 
                                           
                                                 
Total Assets
  $ 1,174,975                     $ 1,158,978                  
 
                                           
 
                                               
Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity
                                               
Consumer time deposits
  $ 464,623     $ 1,947       1.68 %   $ 465,642     $ 2,397       2.06 %
Public time deposits
    59,782       64       0.43       91,515       149       0.65  
Money market accounts
    100,383       82       0.33       90,988       97       0.43  
Savings deposits
    96,978       40       0.17       87,157       42       0.19  
Interest-bearing demand
    155,806       74       0.19       133,392       61       0.18  
Short-term borrowings
    855             0.22       1,778       1       0.25  
FHLB advances
    42,499       260       2.45       42,503       316       2.98  
Trust preferred securities
    16,324       169       4.16       20,728       215       4.17  
 
                                   
Total Interest-Bearing Liabilities
  $ 937,250     $ 2,636       1.13 %   $ 933,703     $ 3,278       1.41 %
 
                                   
Noninterest-bearing deposits
    120,731                       112,223                  
Other liabilities
    5,499                       6,484                  
Shareholders’ Equity
    111,495                       106,568                  
 
                                           
Total Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity
  $ 1,174,975                     $ 1,158,978                  
 
                                           
Net interest Income (FTE)
          $ 9,969       3.64 %           $ 9,826       3.61 %
Taxable Equivalent Adjustment
            (132 )     (0.05 )             (129 )     (0.04 )
 
                                       
Net Interest Income Per Financial Statements
          $ 9,837                     $ 9,697          
 
                                           
Net Yield on Earning Assets
                    3.59 %                     3.57 %
 
                                           

30


Table of Contents

Results of Operations
Three Months Ended June 30, 2011 versus Three Months Ended June 30, 2010 Net Interest Income Comparison
Net interest income is the difference between interest income earned on interest-earning assets and the interest expense paid on interest-bearing liabilities. Net interest income is the Corporation’s principal source of revenue, accounting for 77.82% of the Corporation’s revenues for the three months ended June 30, 2011. The amount of net interest income is affected by changes in the volume and mix of earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities, the level of rates earned or paid on those assets and liabilities and the amount of loan fees earned. The Corporation reviews net interest income on a fully taxable equivalent (FTE) basis, which presents interest income with an adjustment for tax-exempt interest income on an equivalent pre-tax basis assuming a 34% statutory Federal tax rate. These rates may differ from the Corporation’s actual effective tax rate. The net interest margin is net interest income as a percentage of average earning assets.
Net interest income, before provision for loan losses, was $9,836 for the second quarter of 2011 compared to $9,697 during the same quarter of 2010. Adjusting for tax-exempt income, net interest income FTE, before provision for loan losses, for the second quarter of 2011 and 2010 was $9,969 and $9,826, respectively. The net interest margin FTE, determined by dividing tax equivalent net interest income by average earning assets, was 3.64% for the three months ended June 30, 2011 compared to 3.61% for the three months ended June 30, 2010.
Average earning assets for the second quarter of 2011 were $1,099,055. This was an increase of $8,737, or 0.80%, compared to the same quarter last year. The current prolonged period of lower market interest rates has impacted the yield on average earning assets, which totaled 4.60% in the second quarter of 2011 compared to 4.82% for the same period a year ago. The yield on average loans during the second quarter of 2011 was 5.16%, which was 19 basis points lower than the yield on average loans during the second quarter of 2010 of 5.35%. Interest income from securities was $1,982 (FTE) for the three months ended June 30, 2011, compared to $2,425 during the second quarter of 2010. The yield on average securities was 3.25% and 3.85% for these periods, respectively.
The cost of interest-bearing liabilities was 1.13% during the second quarter of 2011 compared to 1.41% during the same period in 2010. This decrease is primarily due to an improved deposit mix with noninterest bearing accounts of $120,731, increasing 7.58% when compared to the same period a year ago. Total average interest-bearing liabilities for the quarter ended June 30, 2011 increased $3,547, or 0.38%, compared to June 30, 2010. Average core deposits for the quarter ended June 30, 2011 increased $17,386, or 1.77%, compared to the same period of 2010. The average cost of trust preferred securities was 4.16% for the second quarter of 2011, compared to 4.17% for the second quarter of 2010. One half of the Corporation’s outstanding trust preferred securities accrues dividends at a fixed rate of 6.64% and the other half accrues dividends at LIBOR plus 1.48%.
Net interest income may also be analyzed by comparing the volume and rate components of interest income and interest expense. Table 2 is an analysis of the changes in interest income and expense between the quarters ended June 30, 2011 and June 30, 2010. The table is presented on a fully tax-equivalent basis.

31


Table of Contents

Table 2: Rate/Volume Analysis of Net Interest Income (FTE)
                         
    Three Months Ended June 30,  
    Increase (Decrease) in Interest Income/Expense  
            in 2011 over 2010        
    Volume     Rate     Total  
            (Dollars in thousands)          
U.S. Govt agencies and corporations
  $ (76 )   $ (382 )   $ (458 )
State and political subdivisions
    30       (15 )     15  
Federal funds sold and interest-bearing
                       
deposits in banks
    (2 )     (1 )     (3 )
Restricted stock
    1       1       2  
Commercial loans
    153       (28 )     125  
Real estate mortgage loans
    (155 )     25       (130 )
Home equity lines of credit
    2       (12 )     (10 )
Installment loans
    330       (370 )     (40 )
 
                 
Total Interest Income
    283       (782 )     (499 )
 
                 
Consumer time deposits
    (4 )     (446 )     (450 )
Public time deposits
    (29 )     (56 )     (85 )
Money market accounts
    8       (23 )     (15 )
Savings deposits
    4       (6 )     (2 )
Interest bearing demand
    11       2       13  
Short-term borrowings
    (1 )           (1 )
FHLB advances
          (56 )     (56 )
Trust preferred securities
    (46 )           (46 )
 
                 
Total Interest Expense
    (57 )     (585 )     (642 )
 
                 
Net Interest Income (FTE)
  $ 340     $ (197 )   $ 143  
 
                 
Net interest income (FTE) for the second quarter 2011 and 2010 was $9,969 and $9,826, respectively. Interest income (FTE) for the second quarter of 2011 decreased $499 in comparison to the same period in 2010. This decrease is primarily attributable to a $782 decrease due to rate and an increase of $283 due to volume. Interest income on securities of U.S. Government agencies and corporations decreased $458, mainly as a result of the continued low interest rate environment. Interest income on commercial loans increased $125, primarily due to increasing loan demand. The $130 decrease in interest income on real estate mortgage loans was primarily attributable to the refinancing in the existing seasoned mortgage portfolio given the low interest rate environment and the Corporation’s practice of selling new mortgage production into the secondary market. The $450 and $85 decreases in consumer time deposits and public time deposits, respectively, were due primarily to lower market interest rates. Total interest expense decreased $642, with the decrease being attributable to a $585 decrease due to rate and a decrease due to volume of $57. Overall, the total increase in net interest income (FTE) of $143 was mainly attributable to an increase in volume of $340 offset by a $197 reduction due to rate which is the difference between interest income and interest expense.

32


Table of Contents

Table 3: Condensed Consolidated Average Balance Sheets
Interest, Rate, and Rate/ Volume differentials are stated on a Fully-Tax Equivalent (FTE) Basis.
Table 1 presents the condensed average balance sheets for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010. Rates are computed on a tax equivalent basis and nonaccrual loans are included in the average loan balances.
                                                 
    Six Months Ended  
    June 30, 2011     June 30, 2010  
    Average                     Average              
    Balance     Interest     Rate     Balance     Interest     Rate  
    (Dollars in thousands)  
Assets:
                                               
U.S. Govt agencies and corporations
  $ 209,418     $ 3,089       3.00 %   $ 228,826     $ 4,255       3.75 %
State and political subdivisions
    24,848       739       6.13       23,222       709       6.16  
Federal funds sold and interest-bearing deposits in banks
    36,208       23       0.13       34,779       20       0.12  
Restricted stock
    5,741       143       5.09       5,319       130       4.93  
Commercial loans
    450,778       11,807       5.28       444,597       11,887       5.39  
Real estate mortgage loans
    63,305       1,766       5.73       75,004       2,014       5.41  
Home equity lines of credit
    109,291       2,129       3.96       108,882       2,141       3.96  
Installment loans
    194,506       5,368       5.67       168,583       5,364       6.42  
 
                                   
Total Earning Assets
  $ 1,094,095     $ 25,064       4.64 %   $ 1,089,212     $ 26,520       4.91 %
 
                                   
Allowance for loan loss
    (17,240 )                     (19,249 )                
Cash and due from banks
    20,295                       17,559                  
Bank owned life insurance
    17,293                       16,582                  
Other assets
    53,504                       54,355                  
 
                                           
Total Assets
  $ 1,167,947                     $ 1,158,459                  
 
                                           
 
                                               
Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity
                                               
Consumer time deposits
  $ 466,746     $ 3,960       1.74 %   $ 471,958     $ 5,021       2.15 %
Public time deposits
    63,216       139       0.46       88,202       320       0.73  
Money market accounts
    99,175       166       0.35       88,978       175       0.40  
Savings deposits
    95,032       78       0.17       85,161       81       0.19  
Interest-bearing demand
    149,835       145       0.20       134,246       128       0.19  
Short-term borrowings
    880       1       0.25       1,688       2       0.24  
FHLB advances
    42,500       527       2.54       43,343       634       2.95  
Trust preferred securities
    16,323       341       4.24       20,727       431       4.19  
 
                                   
Total Interest-Bearing Liabilities
  $ 933,707     $ 5,357       1.19 %   $ 934,303     $ 6,792       1.47 %
 
                                   
Noninterest-bearing deposits
    118,409                       111,740                  
Other liabilities
    5,046                       6,614                  
Shareholders’ Equity
    110,785                       105,802                  
 
                                           
Total Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity
  $ 1,167,947                     $ 1,158,459                  
 
                                           
Net interest Income (FTE)
          $ 19,707       3.63 %           $ 19,728       3.65 %
Taxable Equivalent Adjustment
            (125 )     (0.05 )             (252 )     (0.04 )
 
                                       
Net Interest Income Per Financial Statements
          $ 19,582                     $ 19,476          
 
                                           
Net Yield on Earning Assets
                    3.58 %                     3.61 %
 
                                           
Six Months Ended June 30, 2011 versus Six Months Ended June 30, 2010 Net Interest Income Comparison
Net interest income accounted for 76.80% of the Corporation’s revenues for the six months ended June 30, 2011. The amount of net interest income is affected by changes in the volume and mix of earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities, the level of rates earned or paid on those assets and liabilities and the amount of loan fees earned. The Corporation reviews net interest income on a fully taxable equivalent (FTE) basis, which presents interest

33


Table of Contents

income with an adjustment for tax-exempt interest income on an equivalent pre-tax basis assuming a 34% statutory Federal tax rate. These rates may differ from the Corporation’s actual effective tax rate. The net interest margin is net interest income as a percentage of average earning assets.
Net interest income, before provision for loan losses, was $19,450 for the first half of 2011 compared to $19,476 during the same period of 2010. Adjusting for tax-exempt income, net interest income FTE, before provision for loan losses, for the first half of 2011 and 2010 was $19,707 and $19,728, respectively. The net interest margin FTE, determined by dividing tax equivalent net interest income by average earning assets, was 3.63% for the six months ended June 30, 2011 compared to 3.65% for the six months ended June 30, 2010. This decrease is mainly attributable to the lower interest rate environment which continues to reduce the Corporation’s yield on its investment portfolio and as a result, negatively impacts the net interest margin.
Average earning assets for the first half of 2011 were $1,094,095. This was an increase of $4,883, or 0.45%, compared to the same period last year. Due in part to the current extended period of lower market interest rates, the yield on average earning assets was 4.64% in the first half of 2011 compared to 4.91% for the same period last year. The yield on average loans during the first half of 2011 was 5.20%. This was 22 basis points lower than that of the first half of 2010 at 5.42%. Interest income from securities was $3,828 (FTE) for the six months ended June 30, 2011, compared to $4,965 during the first half of 2010. The yield on average securities was 3.30% and 3.99% for these periods, respectively.
The cost of interest-bearing liabilities was 1.19% during the first half of 2011 compared to 1.47% during the same period in 2010. Total average interest-bearing liabilities as of June 30, 2011 remained relatively constant compared to June 30, 2010. Average core deposits increased 1.24% as of June 30, 2011 compared to the same period of 2010. The average cost of trust preferred securities was 4.24% for the first half of 2011, compared to 4.19% for the first half of 2010.
Net interest income may also be analyzed by comparing the volume and rate components of interest income and interest expense. Table 4 is an analysis of the changes in interest income and expense between the six months ended June 30, 2011 and June 30, 2010. The table is presented on a fully tax-equivalent basis.

34


Table of Contents

Table 4: Rate/Volume Analysis of Net Interest Income (FTE)
                         
    Six Months Ended June 30,  
    Increase (Decrease) in Interest Income/Expense  
            in 2011 over 2010        
    Volume     Rate     Total  
      (Dollars in thousands)  
U.S. Govt agencies and corporations
  $ (286 )   $ (880 )   $ (1,166 )
State and political subdivisions
    48       (18 )     30  
Federal funds sold and interest-bearing deposits in banks
    1       2       3  
Restricted stock
    11       2       13  
Commercial loans
    162       (242 )     (80 )
Real estate mortgage loans
    (326 )     78       (248 )
Home equity lines of credit
    8       (20 )     (12 )
Installment loans
    715       (711 )     4  
 
                 
Total Interest Income
    333       (1,789 )     (1,456 )
 
                 
Consumer time deposits
    (44 )     (1,017 )     (1,061 )
Public time deposits
    (55 )     (126 )     (181 )
Money market accounts
    17       (26 )     (9 )
Savings deposits
    8       (11 )     (3 )
Interest bearing demand
    15       2       17  
Short-term borrowings
    (1 )           (1 )
FHLB advances
    (10 )     (97 )     (107 )
Trust preferred securities
    (91 )     1       (90 )
 
                 
Total Interest Expense
    (161 )     (1,274 )     (1,435 )
 
                 
Net Interest Income (FTE)
  $ 494     $ (515 )   $ (21 )
 
                 
Net interest income (FTE) for the first half 2011 and 2010 was $19,707 and $19,728, respectively. Interest income (FTE) for the first half of 2011 decreased $1,456 in comparison to the same period in 2010. This decrease is attributable to $1,789 decrease due to rate and an increase of $333 due to volume. For the same period, interest expense decreased $1,435, with the decrease being primarily attributable to a $1,274 decrease due to rate and a decrease due to volume of $161. Overall, the total decrease in net interest income (FTE) of $21 was mainly attributable to an increase in volume of $494 offset by a $515 reduction due to rate which is the difference between interest income and interest expense.

35


Table of Contents

     Noninterest Income
Table 5: Details on Noninterest Income
                                 
    Three Months Ended June 30,     Six Months Ended June 30,  
    2011     2010     2011     2010  
    (Dollars in thousands)     (Dollars in thousands)  
Investment and trust services
  $ 470     $ 563     $ 873     $ 1,008  
Deposit service charges
    1,000       1,094       1,916       2,033  
Electronic banking fees
    819       826       1,725       1,620  
Income from bank owned life insurance
    175       173       349       344  
Other income
    41       69       120       162  
 
                       
Total fees and other income
    2,505       2,725       4,983       5,167  
 
                       
Gain on sale of securities
    88             500       38  
Gain on sale of loans
    238       195       417       387  
Gains (losses) on sale of other assets
    (27 )     (24 )     (25 )     (45 )
 
                       
Total noninterest income
  $ 2,804     $ 2,896     $ 5,875     $ 5,547  
 
                       
Three Months Ended June 30, 2011 versus Three Months Ended June 30, 2010 Noninterest Income Comparison
Total fees and other income for the three months ended June 30, 2011 was $2,505, a decrease of $220, or 8.07%, over the same period 2010. Income earned on investment and trust services declined $93 compared to the prior period primarily as a result of the discontinuation of the Corporation’s brokerage division which occurred during the third quarter of 2010. Deposit service charges decreased by $94 when compared to a year ago and continued to be impacted by the economic environment and new regulations regarding overdrafts.
Total net gains recorded during the second quarter of 2011 increased $131 over the second quarter of 2010. This increase was mainly attributable to the $88 gain on sale of securities. Gains on the sale of loans increased $43, primarily as a result of the higher volume of indirect consumer loan sales during the second quarter of 2011 compared to the same period of 2010. A total of $13,309 of indirect consumer loans were sold during the second quarter of 2011 compared to $9,397 for second quarter 2010, an increase of 41.63%.
Six Months Ended June 30, 2011 versus Six Months Ended June 30, 2010 Noninterest Income Comparison
Total fees and other income for the six months ended June 30, 2011 was $4,983, a decrease of $184, or 3.56%, over the same period of 2010. Income earned on investment and trust services decreased $135, or 13.39% compared to 2010, mainly as a result of discontinuation of the Corporation’s brokerage division however this decrease was mitigated by higher market valuation fees and increased trust account fees. Fees from electronic banking increased $105 compared to the same period last year. Service charges on deposits decreased $117, which resulted primarily from both the economic environment and the new regulations regarding overdrafts.
Total net gains recorded during the first half of 2011 increased $492 over the first half of 2010. Of this increase, $462 was attributable to the sale of securities and $30 was attributable to the sale of loans. Sales of bank owned property resulted in a loss of $25 during the first half of 2011.

36


Table of Contents

     Noninterest Expense
Table 6: Details on Noninterest Expense
                                 
    Three Months Ended June 30,     Six Months Ended June 30,  
    2011     2010     2011     2010  
    (Dollars in thousands)     (Dollars in thousands)  
Salaries and employee benefits
  $ 4,072     $ 3,911     $ 8,163     $ 7,829  
Furniture and equipment
    798       917       1,478       1,850  
Net occupancy
    588       581       1,200       1,196  
Professional fees
    445       595       931       1,148  
Marketing and public relations
    275       326       546       572  
Supplies, postage and freight
    289       302       561       644  
Telecommunications
    169       211       384       423  
Ohio Franchise tax
    298       281       596       562  
FDIC Assessments
    399       557       973       1,085  
Other real estate owned
    207       71       797       152  
Electronic banking expenses
    223       238       432       422  
Loan and Collection Expense
    310       450       752       773  
Other expense
    449       518       898       995  
 
                       
Total noninterest expense
  $ 8,522     $ 8,958     $ 17,711     $ 17,651  
 
                       
Three Months Ended June 30, 2011 versus Three Months Ended June 30, 2010 Noninterest Expense Comparison
Noninterest expense for the second quarter of 2011 decreased $436, or 4.87%, compared to the same period of 2010. The decline in noninterest expense was mainly attributable to lower FDIC assessments relative to the second quarter of 2010, due to the new risk-based assessment system adopted by the FDIC during the second quarter of 2011. Professional fees and loan and collection expense declined $290, or 15.10%, compared to the second quarter of 2010, primarily as a result of the Corporation’s establishment of an internal legal function. Other real estate costs increased $136 for the second quarter of 2011 compared to 2010, mainly due to higher costs associated with foreclosure proceedings and valuation allowances recorded for these properties.
Six Months Ended June 30, 2011 versus Six Months Ended June 30, 2010 Noninterest Expense Comparison
Noninterest expense increased slightly by $60, or 0.34%, for the first half of 2011 over the same period 2010. FDIC assessments decreased $112 compared to the same period of 2010. Furniture and equipment expense decreased $372, or 20.11%, compared to the prior period. The decrease in furniture and equipment expense was mainly as a result of the consolidation of data servicing centers during the first quarter of 2010. Professional fees decreased $217, or 18.90%, compared to the same period a year ago, mainly due to the establishment of the Corporation’s internal legal function. Offsetting these decreases, salaries and employee benefits increased $334, or 4.27%, compared to the same period of 2010. The Corporation also experienced an increase of $645 in other real estate costs primarily due to higher costs associated with foreclosure proceedings and valuation allowances recorded for these properties.
     Income taxes
Three Months Ended June 30, 2011 versus Three Months Ended June 30, 2010 Income Taxes Comparison
The Corporation recognized income tax expense of $61 and $283 for the second quarter of 2011 and 2010, respectively. Included in net income for the three months ended June 30, 2011 and June 30, 2010 was $430 and $415 of nontaxable income, including $145 and $142 related to life insurance policies and $285 and $273 of tax-exempt investment and loan interest income, respectively. The new market tax credit generated by North Coast Community Development Corporation, a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Bank, also had a significant impact on income tax expense and contributes to a lower effective tax rate for the Corporation. After considering the tax-exempt income and relatively small nondeductible expenses, income subject to tax for the quarter was significantly less than income before income tax expense.

37


Table of Contents

Six Months Ended June 30, 2011 versus Six Months Ended June 30, 2010 Income Taxes Comparison
The Corporation recognized income tax expense of $327 and $580 during the first half of 2011 and 2010, respectively. Included in net income for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and June 30, 2010 was $843 and $826 of nontaxable income, including $287 and $282 related to life insurance policies and $556 and $544 of tax-exempt investment and loan interest income, respectively. The new market tax credit generated by North Coast Community Development Corporation, a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Bank, also had a significant impact on income tax expense and contributes to a lower effective tax rate for the Corporation. After considering the tax-exempt income and relatively small nondeductible expenses, income subject to tax for the six month period was significantly less than income before income tax expense.
Financial Condition
     Overview
The Corporation’s assets at June 30, 2011 were $1,157,344 compared to $1,152,537 at December 31, 2010. This is an increase of $4,807, or 0.42%. Total securities increased $9,300, or 4.19%, compared to December 31, 2010, mainly as a result of the Corporation’s purchase of U.S. Government agency securities and U.S. agency mortgage backed securities. Portfolio loans increased $17,733, or 2.18%, from December 31, 2010 due to increased loan demand. Total deposits at June 30, 2011 were $982,037 compared to $978,526 at December 31, 2010. The growth in deposits primarily came in the form of core deposits which generally tends to improve liquidity while reducing costs.
     Securities
The composition of the Corporation’s securities portfolio at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 is presented in Note 5 to the Consolidated Financial Statements contained within this Form 10-Q. The Corporation continues to employ its securities portfolio to manage interest rate risk and to manage its liquidity needs. As of June 30, 2011 the portfolio was comprised of 97.58% available for sale securities and 2.42% restricted stock. Available for sale securities were comprised of 27.41% U.S. Government agencies, 47.50% U.S. agency mortgage backed securities, 14.39% U.S. agency collateralized mortgage obligations and 10.70% municipal securities. At June 30, 2011, the available for sale securities had a net temporary unrealized gain of $6,616, representing 2.95% of the total amortized cost of the Bank’s available for sale securities.
     Loans
The detail of loan balances are presented in Note 6 to the Consolidated Financial Statements contained within this Form 10-Q. Table 7 provides detail by loan segment.
Table 7: Details on Loan Balances
                 
    June 30, 2011     December 31, 2010  
    (Dollars in thousands)  
Commercial real estate
  $ 386,891     $ 375,803  
Commercial
    72,679       65,662  
Real estate mortgage
    68,837       74,685  
Home equity loans
    130,143       132,536  
Indirect
    158,885       150,031  
Consumer
    12,877       13,862  
 
           
Total Loans
    830,312       812,579  
Allowance for loan losses
    (17,351 )     (16,136 )
 
           
Net Loans
  $ 812,961     $ 796,443  
 
           
Despite the limited availability of quality loan opportunities throughout the financial industry, the Corporation significantly increased its commercial real estate, commercial and indirect loan portfolios during the second quarter of 2011. Commercial real estate loans increased by $11,088, or 2.95%, compared to December 31, 2010 and

38


Table of Contents

commercial loans increased by $7,017, or 10.69%, compared to December 31, 2010. Indirect loans increased by $8,854, or 5.90%, compared to December 31, 2010. The decline of $5,848 in real estate mortgages is mainly attributable to refinancing activity in the existing seasoned mortgage portfolio given the low interest rate environment and the Corporation’s practice of selling new mortgage production into the secondary market. Home equity loans declined $2,393 or 1.81%, compared to December 31, 2010. Consumer loans did not change significantly compared to December 31, 2010.
Total portfolio loans at June 30, 2011 were $830,312. This is an increase of $17,733 from December 31, 2010. At June 30, 2011, commercial and commercial real estate loans represented 55.35% of total portfolio loans. Real estate mortgages and home equity loans comprise 8.29% and 15.67% of total portfolio loans, respectively. Indirect and consumer loans were 20.69% of total portfolio loans. Consumer loans are made to borrowers on both secured and unsecured terms, depending on the maturity and nature of the loan.
Loans held for sale, and not included in portfolio loans, were $1,308 at June 30, 2011. Mortgage loans held for sale accounted for the majority of the loans held for sale. The Corporation has a practice of retaining the servicing rights on loans that are sold.
Expected cash flow and interest rate information for loans is presented in the following table:
Table 8: Cash Flow and Interest Rate Information for Loans:
         
    As of  
    June 30, 2011  
Due in one year or less
  $ 260,739  
Due after one year but within five years
    292,958  
Due after five years
    276,615  
 
     
Totals
  $ 830,312  
 
     
 
       
Due after one year with a predetermined fixed interest rate
  $ 484,700  
Due after one year with a floating interest rate
    84,873  
 
     
Totals
  $ 569,573  
 
     
     Provision and Allowance for Loan Losses
The allowance for loan losses is maintained by the Corporation at a level considered by Management to be adequate and appropriate to cover probable credit losses inherent in the Corporation’s loan portfolio. The amount of the provision for loan losses charged to operating expenses is the amount necessary, in the estimation of Management, to maintain the allowance for loan losses at an adequate level. Management determines the adequacy of the allowance based upon past experience, changes in portfolio size and mix, trends in delinquency, relative quality of the loan portfolio and the rate of loan growth, assessments of current and future economic conditions, and information about specific borrower situations, including their financial position and collateral values, and other factors, which are subject to change over time. While Management’s periodic analysis of the allowance for loan losses may dictate portions of the allowance be allocated to specific problem loans, the entire amount is available for any loan charge-offs that may occur. Table 9 presents the detailed activity in the allowance for loan losses and related charge-off activity for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2011 and 2010.

39


Table of Contents

Table 9: Analysis of Allowance for Loan Losses
                                 
    Three Months Ended     Six Months Ended  
    June 30, 2011     June 30, 2010     June 30, 2011     June 30, 2010  
    (Dollars in thousands)     (Dollars in thousands)  
Balance at beginning of period
  $ 17,315     $ 19,183     $ 16,136     $ 18,792  
Charge-offs:
                               
Commercial real estate
    1,862       1,593       2,092       2,549  
Commercial & industrial
    224       4       224       44  
Real estate mortgage
    753       77       1,026       139  
Home equity lines of credit
    341       329       686       758  
Indirect
    143       143       338       414  
Consumer
    134             167       43  
DDA Overdrafts
    42       42       78       92  
 
                       
Total charge-offs
    3,499       2,188       4,611       4,039  
 
                       
Recoveries:
                               
Commercial real estate
    114       69       216       71  
Commercial & industrial
    4       133       35       134  
Real estate mortgage
    6             10        
Home equity lines of credit
    1             2        
Indirect
    47       113       72       216  
Consumer
    5       6       14       12  
DDA Overdrafts
    13       10       32       31  
 
                       
Total Recoveries
    190       331       381       464  
 
                       
Net Charge-offs
    3,309       1,857       4,230       3,575  
 
                       
Provision for loan losses
    3,345       2,109       5,445       4,218  
Balance at end of period
  $ 17,351     $ 19,435     $ 17,351     $ 19,435  
 
                       
 
Loans outstanding at end of period
  $ 830,312     $ 795,451     $ 830,312     $ 795,451  
 
                       
Allowance for loan losses as a percent of loans outstanding at the end of the period
    2.09 %     2.44 %     2.09 %     2.44 %
                                 
Average Loans Outstanding
  $ 815,618     $ 792,132     $ 813,300     $ 794,076  
 
                       
                                 
Annualized ratio to average loans:
                               
Net Charge-offs
    1.63 %     0.94 %     2.09 %     1.81 %
Provision for loan losses
    1.64 %     1.07 %     2.69 %     2.13 %
Due to the overall economic conditions and increasing levels of problem loans experienced industry wide, primarily commercial and commercial real estate loans, the Corporation created a dedicated loan workout group early in the fourth quarter of 2009 staffed with new hires with workout experience. During 2010, as the group became familiar with the Corporation’s problem loans, a segment of commercial and commercial real estate loans which had previously been identified as having higher risk factors in accordance with ASC 450 (FAS 5) was designated as impaired in accordance with ASC 310-10-35 (FAS 114). In addition, the Corporation improved the timeliness of recognizing liquidation as the primary source of repayment of the problem loans. These loans were then charged-down to their net realizable values, less costs to sell, in accordance with ASC 310-10-35 (FAS 114). As a result, the Corporation experienced an increase in charge-offs in 2010, primarily with respect to commercial and commercial real estate loans, which in turn reduced the level of specific reserves provided for these loans under ASC 310-10-35 (FAS 114). During the same period and in response to increasing levels of problem loans experienced by the Corporation, the level of the portion of the Corporation’s allowance for loan losses allocated to loans having high risk factors in accordance with ASC 450 (FAS 5) increased.
The allowance for loan losses at June 30, 2011 was $17,351, or 2.09%, of outstanding loans, compared to $19,435, or 2.44%, of portfolio loans at June 30, 2010 and $16,136, or 1.99%, of outstanding loans at December 31, 2010. The allowance for loan losses was 45.72% and 41.87% of nonperforming loans at June 30, 2011 and June 30, 2010, respectively.
The provision for loan losses for the quarter ended June 30, 2011 was $3,345 compared to provision for loan losses of $2,109 one year ago and for the six months ended June 30, 2011 was $5,445 compared to $4,218 for the six

40


Table of Contents

months ended June 30, 2010. Net charge-offs for the three months ended June 30, 2011 were $3,309, compared to $1,857 for the three months ended June 30, 2010. Net charge-offs for the six months ended June 30, 2011 were $4,230, compared to $3,575 for the six months ended June 30, 2010. Annualized net charge-offs as a percent of average loans for the second quarter and first half of 2011 were 1.63% and 1.05% respectively, compared to 0.94% and 0.91% for the same periods in 2010. The provision for loan losses for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2011 was, in the opinion of Management, adequate when balancing the charge-off levels with the level of nonperforming loans, the level of potential problem loans and delinquency. The resulting allowance for loan losses is, in the opinion of Management, sufficient given its analysis of the information available about the portfolio at June 30, 2011. The Corporation continues to aggressively address potential problem loans, and underwriting standards continue to be adjusted in response to trends and asset review findings.
     Deposits
Table 10: Deposits and Borrowings
                                 
    Average Balances Outstanding     Average Rates Paid  
            For the three months ended        
    June 30, 2011     December 31, 2010     June 30, 2011     December 31, 2010  
            (Dollars in thousands)                  
Demand deposits
  $ 120,731     $ 112,810       0.00 %     0.00 %
Interest checking
    155,806       141,974       0.19       0.17  
Savings deposits
    96,978       89,982       0.16       0.17  
Money Market Accounts
    100,383       93,502       0.32       0.41  
Consumer time deposits
    464,623       464,924       1.66       1.81  
Public time deposits
    59,782       80,990       0.42       0.54  
 
                       
Total Deposits
    998,303       984,182       0.88       0.98  
Short-term borrowings
    855       1,852       0.21       0.25  
FHLB borrowings
    42,499       42,501       2.43       2.98  
Junior subordinated debentures
    16,324       16,322       4.12       3.18  
 
                       
Total borrowings
    59,678       60,675       2.86       2.95  
 
                       
Total funding
  $ 1,057,981     $ 1,044,857       0.99 %     1.23 %
 
                       
Average deposits for the three months ended June 30, 2011 were $998,303 compared to average deposits of $984,182 for the three months ended December 31, 2010. Deposit accounts and the generation of deposit accounts continued to be the primary source of funds for the Corporation. As indicated in the table above, growth in transaction core deposits has reduced the Corporation’s reliance on public certificate of deposit accounts and has maintained the net interest margin. The Corporation offers various deposit products to both retail and business customers. The Corporation also has available its business sweep accounts to generate funds as well as the brokered CD market to provide funding comparable to other national market borrowings, which include the Federal Home Loan Bank of Cincinnati and the Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland.
The following table summarizes total consumer and public time deposits greater than or equal to $100,000 as of June 30, 2011 by remaining maturity:
Table 11: Consumer and Public Time Deposits Greater Than $100,000
         
  June 30, 2011  
  (Dollars in thousands)  
Less than 3 months
  $ 39,015  
3 to 6 months
    52,946  
6 to 12 months
    91,526  
Over 12 months
    49,033  
 
     
Total
  $ 232,520  
 
     

41


Table of Contents

     Borrowings
The Corporation utilizes both short-term and long-term borrowings to assist in the growth of earning assets. For the Corporation, short-term borrowings include federal funds purchased and repurchase agreements. As of June 30, 2011, the Corporation had $756 of short-term borrowings. There were no federal funds purchased at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010. Long-term borrowings for the Corporation consist of Federal Home Loan Bank advances of $42,499 and junior subordinated debentures of $16,238. Federal Home Loan Bank advances were $42,501 at December 31, 2010. Maturities of long-term Federal Home Loan Bank advances are presented in Note 9 to the Consolidated Financial Statements contained within this Form 10-Q.
During the second quarter of 2007, the Corporation completed a private offering of trust preferred securities, as described in Note 10 to the Consolidated Financial Statements contained within this Form 10-Q. The securities were issued in two $10 million tranches, one of which pays dividends at a fixed rate of 6.64% per annum and the other of which pays dividends at LIBOR plus 1.48% per annum. During the third quarter of 2010, the Corporation exchanged and retired $4,250 principal amount of its non-pooled trust preferred securities for approximately 462,000 newly issued shares of the Corporation’s common stock.
     Regulatory Capital
The Corporation continued to maintain an appropriate capital position. Total shareholders’ equity was $111,497 at June 30, 2011. This is an increase of 1.86% over December 31, 2010. For the six months ended June 30, 2011, total shareholders’ equity was increased by net income of $1,842, $92 for share-based compensation and a $888 increase in accumulated other comprehensive gain resulting from an increase in the fair value of available for sale securities. Factors decreasing shareholders’ equity were cash dividends payable to common shareholders in the amount of $159 and cash dividends payable to preferred shareholders in the amount of $637. The Corporation held 328,194 shares of common stock as treasury stock at June 30, 2011, at a cost of $6,092.
The Corporation and the Bank continue to monitor balance sheet growth in an effort to stay within the guidelines established by applicable regulatory authorities. At June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the Corporation and Bank maintained capital ratios consistent with current guidelines to be deemed well-capitalized under Federal banking regulations.
On July 28, 2005, the Corporation announced a share repurchase program of up to 5 percent, or approximately 332,000, of its common shares outstanding. Repurchased shares can be used for a number of corporate purposes, including the Corporation’s stock option and employee benefit plans. The share repurchase program provides that share repurchases are to be made primarily on the open market from time-to-time until the 5 percent maximum is repurchased or the earlier termination of the repurchase program by the Board of Directors, at the discretion of Management based upon market, business, legal and other factors. However, the terms of the Corporation’s sale of $25,223 of its Series B Preferred Stock to the U.S. Treasury in December 2008 in conjunction with the TARP Capital Purchase Program include limitations on the Corporation’s ability to repurchase its common shares. For three years after the issuance or until the U.S. Treasury no longer holds any Series B Preferred Stock, the Corporation will not be able to repurchase any of its common shares or preferred stock without, among other things, U.S. Treasury approval or the availability of certain limited exceptions, e.g., purchases in connection with the Corporation’s benefit plans. Furthermore, as long as the Series B Preferred Stock issued to the U.S. Treasury is outstanding, repurchases or redemptions relating to certain equity securities, including the Corporation’s common shares, are prohibited until all accrued and unpaid dividends are paid on such preferred stock, subject to certain limited exceptions. As of June 30, 2011, the Corporation had repurchased an aggregate of 202,500 shares under this program.
Forward-Looking Statements
This Form 10-Q contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the “Safe Harbor” provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Terms such as “will,” “should,” “plan,” “intend,” “expect,” “continue,” “believe,” “anticipate” and “seek,” as well as similar comments, are forward-looking in nature. Actual results and events may differ materially from those expressed or anticipated as a result of risks and uncertainties which include but are not limited to:
    increases in interest rates or further weakening economic conditions that could constrain borrowers’ ability to repay outstanding loans or diminish the value of the collateral securing those loans;

42


Table of Contents

 
    asset price deterioration, which has had and may continue to have a negative effect on the valuation of certain asset categories represented on the Corporation’s balance sheet;
 
    general economic conditions, either nationally or regionally (especially in northeastern Ohio), becoming less favorable than expected resulting in, among other things, further deterioration in credit quality of assets;
 
    significant increases in competitive pressure in the banking and financial services industries;
 
    changes in the interest rate environment which could reduce anticipated or actual margins;
 
    changes in political conditions or the legislative or regulatory environment, including new or heightened legal standards and regulatory requirements, practices or expectations, which may impede profitability or affect the Corporation’s financial condition (such as, for example, the Dodd-Frank Wall Street reform and Consumer Protection Act and rules and regulations that may be promulgated under the Act);
 
    persisting volatility and limited credit availability in the financial markets, particularly if limitations on the Corporation’s ability to raise funding to the extent required by banking regulators or otherwise; or if initiatives undertaken by the U.S. government do not have the intended effect on the financial markets;
 
    limitations on the Corporation’s ability to return capital to shareholders and dilution of the Corporation’s common shares that may result from the terms of the Capital Purchase Program (“CPP”), pursuant to which the Corporation issued securities to the United States Department of the Treasury (the “U.S. Treasury”);
 
    limitations on the Corporation’s ability to pay dividends;
 
    adverse effects on the Corporation’s ability to engage in routine funding transactions as a result of the actions and commercial soundness of other financial institutions;
 
    increases in deposit insurance premiums or assessments imposed on the Corporation by the FDIC;
 
    difficulty attracting and/or retaining key executives and/or relationship managers at compensation levels necessary to maintain a competitive market position;
 
    changes occurring in business conditions and inflation;
 
    changes in technology;
 
    changes in trade, monetary, fiscal and tax policies;
 
    changes in the securities markets, in particular, continued disruption in the fixed income markets and adverse capital market conditions;
 
    continued disruption in the housing markets and related conditions in the financial markets; and
 
    changes in general economic conditions and competition in the geographic and business areas in which the Corporation conducts its operations; as well as the risks and uncertainties described from time to time in the Corporation’s reports as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
The Corporation’s consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The Corporation follows general practices within the banking industry and application of these principles requires Management to make assumptions, estimates and judgments that affect the financial statements and accompanying notes. These assumptions, estimates and judgments are based on information available as of the date of the financial statements.
The most significant accounting policies followed by the Corporation are presented in Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements contained within this Form 10-Q. These policies are fundamental to the understanding of results of operation and financial conditions.
The accounting policies considered by Management to be critical are as follows:
Allowance for Loan Losses
The allowance for loan losses is an amount that Management believes will be adequate to absorb probable credit losses inherent in the loan portfolio taking into consideration such factors as past loss experience, changes in the nature and volume of the portfolio, overall portfolio quality, loan concentrations, specific problem loans and current

43


Table of Contents

economic conditions that affect the borrower’s ability to pay. Determination of the allowance is subjective in nature. Loan losses are charged off against the allowance when Management believes that the full collectability of the loan is unlikely. Recoveries of amounts previously charged-off are credited to the allowance.
A loan is considered impaired when it is probable that not all principal and interest amounts will be collected according to the loan contract. Residential mortgage, installment and other consumer loans are evaluated collectively for impairment. Individual commercial loans exceeding size thresholds established by Management are evaluated for impairment. Impaired loans are written down by the establishment of a specific allowance where necessary. The fair value of all loans currently evaluated for impairment is collateral-dependent and therefore the fair value is determined by the fair value of the underlying collateral.
The Corporation maintains the allowance for loan losses at a level adequate to absorb Management’s estimate of probable credit losses inherent in the loan portfolio. The allowance is comprised of a general allowance, a specific allowance for identified problem loans and an unallocated allowance representing estimations pursuant to either Statement of Financial Accounting Standards ASC 450, “Accounting for Contingencies,” or ASC 310-10-45, “Accounting by Creditors for Impairment of a Loan.”
The general allowance is determined by applying estimated loss factors to the credit exposures from outstanding loans. For commercial and commercial real estate loans, loss factors are applied based on internal risk grades of these loans. Many factors are considered when these grades are assigned to individual loans such as current and past delinquency, financial statements of the borrower, current net realizable value of collateral and the general economic environment and specific economic trends affecting the portfolio. For residential real estate, installment and other loans, loss factors are applied on a portfolio basis. Loss factors are based on the Corporation’s historical loss experience and are reviewed for appropriateness on a quarterly basis, along with other factors affecting the collectability of the loan portfolio.
Specific allowances are established for all classified loans when Management has determined that, due to identified significant conditions, it is probable that a loss has been incurred that exceeds the general allowance loss factor from these loans. The unallocated allowance recognizes the estimation risk associated with the allocated general and specific allowances and incorporates Management’s evaluation of existing conditions that are not included in the allocated allowance determinations. These conditions are reviewed quarterly by Management and include general economic conditions, credit quality trends and internal loan review and regulatory examination findings.
Management believes that it uses the best information available to determine the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses. However, future adjustments to the allowance may be necessary and the results of operations could be significantly and adversely affected if circumstances differ substantially from the assumptions used in making the determinations.
Income Taxes
The Corporation’s income tax expense and related current and deferred tax assets and liabilities are presented as prescribed in ASC 740, “Accounting for Income Taxes”. The accounting requires the periodic review and adjustment of tax assets and liabilities based on many assumptions. These assumptions include predictions as to the Corporation’s future profitability, as well as potential changes in tax laws that could impact the deductibility of certain income and expense items. Since financial results could be significantly different than these estimates, future adjustments may be necessary to tax expense and related balance sheet accounts.

44


Table of Contents

Goodwill
The goodwill impairment test is a two-step process that requires Management to make judgments in determining what assumptions to use in the calculation. The first step in impairment testing is to estimate the fair value based on valuation techniques including a discounted cash flow model with revenue and profit forecasts and comparing those estimated fair values with the carrying values, which includes the allocated goodwill. If the carrying value exceeds its fair value, goodwill impairment may be indicated and a second step is performed to compute the amount of the impairment by determining an “implied fair value” of goodwill. The determination of an “implied fair value” of goodwill requires the Corporation to allocate fair value to the assets and liabilities. Any unallocated fair value represents the “implied fair value” of goodwill, which is compared to its corresponding carrying value. An impairment loss would be recognized as a charge to earnings to the extent the carrying amount of the goodwill exceeds the implied fair value of the goodwill. See Note 4 (Goodwill and Intangible Assets) for further detail.
New Accounting Pronouncements
Management is not aware of any proposed regulations or current recommendations by the Financial Accounting Standards Board or by regulatory authorities, which, if they were implemented, would have a material effect on the liquidity, capital resources, or operations of the Corporation.

45


Table of Contents

ITEM 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.
RISK ELEMENTS
Risk management is an essential aspect in operating a financial services company successfully and effectively. The most prominent risk exposures, for a financial services company, are credit, operational, interest rate, market, and liquidity risk. Credit risk involves the risk of uncollectible interest and principal balance on a loan when it is due. Fraud, legal and compliance issues, processing errors, technology and the related disaster recovery, and breaches in business continuation and internal controls are types of operational risks. Changes in interest rates affecting net interest income are considered interest rate risks. Market risk is the risk that a financial institution’s earnings and capital or its ability to meet its business objectives are adversely affected by movements in market rates or prices. Such movements include fluctuations in interest rates, foreign exchange rates, equity prices that affect the changes in value of available-for-sale securities, credit spreads and commodity prices. The inability to fund obligations due to investors, borrowers or depositors is liquidity risk. For the Corporation, the dominant risks are market, credit and liquidity risk.
     Credit Risk Management
Uniform underwriting criteria, ongoing risk monitoring and review processes and well-defined, centralized credit policies dictate the management of credit risk for the Corporation. As such, credit risk is managed through the Corporation’s allowance for loan loss policy which requires the loan officer, lending officers, and the loan review committee to manage loan quality. The Corporation’s credit policies are reviewed and modified on an ongoing basis in order to remain suitable for the management of credit risks within the loan portfolio as conditions change. The Corporation uses a loan rating system to properly classify and assess the credit quality of individual commercial loan transactions. The loan rating system is used to determine the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses for regulatory reporting purposes and to assist in the determination of the frequency of review for credit exposures.
     Nonperforming Assets
Total nonperforming assets consist of nonperforming loans and other foreclosed assets. A loan is considered nonperforming if it is 90 days past due and/or in Management’s estimation the collection of interest on the loan is doubtful. Nonperforming loans no longer accrue interest and are accounted for on a cash basis. The ratio of nonperforming loans to total loans decreased from 5.15% at December 31, 2010 to 4.57% at June 30, 2011. This is the result of Management’s continued focus on asset quality. Nonperforming loans at June 30, 2011 were $37,954 compared to $41,831 at December 31, 2010, a decrease of $3,877. Of this total, commercial real estate loans were $24,532 or 64.64% of total nonperforming loans compared to $25,941 or 62.01% of total nonperforming loans at December 31, 2010. These loans are primarily secured by real estate and, in some cases, by SBA guarantees, and have either been charged-down to their realizable value or a specific reserve has been established for any collateral short-fall. All nonperforming loans are being actively managed.
Other foreclosed assets were $2,277 as of June 30, 2011 compared to $3,119 at December 31, 2010. The $2,277 is comprised of $1,025 in residential properties and $1,252 in commercial real estate properties. This compares to $1,935 in residential properties and $1,184 in commercial real estate properties as of December 31, 2010.
Table 12 sets forth nonperforming assets at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010.

46


Table of Contents

Table 12: Nonperforming Assets
                 
    June 30, 2011     December 31, 2010  
    (Dollars in thousands)  
Commercial loans
  $ 26,404     $ 28,613  
Real estate mortgage
    6,661       8,853  
Home equity lines of credit
    2,880       2,398  
Installment loans
    2,009       1,967  
 
           
Total nonperforming loans
    37,954       41,831  
 
           
Other foreclosed assets
    2,277       3,119  
 
           
Total nonperforming assets
  $ 40,231     $ 44,950  
Loans 90 days past due accruing interest
  $     $  
Total nonperforming loans to total loans
    4.57 %     5.21 %
         
Allowance for loan losses to nonperforming assets
    43.13 %     35.90 %
         
     Market Risk Management
The Corporation manages market risk through its Asset/Liability Management Committee (“ALCO”) at the Bank level governed by policies set forth and established by the Board of Directors. This committee assesses interest rate risk exposure through two primary measures: rate sensitive assets divided by rate sensitive liabilities and earnings-at-risk simulation of net interest income over the one year planning cycle and the longer term strategic horizon in order to provide a stable and steadily increasing flow of net interest income.
The difference between a financial institution’s interest rate sensitive assets and interest rate sensitive liabilities is referred to as the interest rate gap. An institution that has more interest rate sensitive assets than interest rate sensitive liabilities in a given period is said to be asset sensitive or has a positive gap. This means that if interest rates rise, a corporation’s net interest income may rise and if interest rates fall, its net interest income may decline. If interest sensitive liabilities exceed interest sensitive assets then the opposite impact on net interest income may occur. The usefulness of the gap measure is limited. It is important to know the gross dollars of assets and liabilities that may re-price in various time horizons, but without knowing the frequency and basis of the potential rate changes the predictive power of the gap measure is limited.
Two more useful tools in managing market risk are net interest income at risk simulation and economic value of equity simulation. A net interest income-at-risk analysis is a modeling approach that combines the repricing information from gap analysis, with forecasts of balance sheet growth and changes in future interest rates. The result of this simulation provides Management with a range of possible net interest margin outcomes. Trends that are identified in net interest income at risk simulation can help identify product and pricing decisions that can be made currently to assure stable net interest income performance in the future. Using a rolling 12 month forecast, at June 30, 2011, a “shock” treatment of the balance sheet, in which a parallel shift in the yield curve occurs and all rates increase immediately, indicates that in a +200 basis point shock, net interest income would increase $239, or 0.60%, and in a -200 basis point shock, net interest income would decrease $2,667, or 6.70%. The reason for the lack of symmetry in these results is the implied floors in many of the Corporation’s core funding which limits their downward adjustment from current offering rates. This analysis is done to describe a best or worst case scenario. Factors such as non-parallel yield curve shifts, Management pricing changes, customer preferences and other factors are likely to produce different results.
The Economic Value of Equity at Risk (EVE) is the difference between the present value of all asset cash flows and the present value of all liability cash flows. EVE at risk is an estimate of the Corporation’s capital at risk to adverse changes in interest rates and represents the structural mismatch between the rate sensitivity of the assets versus the liabilities. It is a comprehensive measure for assessing and managing the Corporation’s interest rate risk exposure. At June 30, 2011, this analysis indicated that a +200 basis point change in rates would reduce the value of the Corporation’s equity by 14.80% while a -200 basis point change in rates would increase the value of the Corporation’s equity by 8.30%.
     Liquidity Risk Management
Liquidity risk is the possibility of the Corporation being unable to meet current and future financial obligations in a timely manner. Liquidity is managed to ensure stable, reliable and cost-effective sources of funds to satisfy demand

47


Table of Contents

for credit, deposit withdrawals and investment opportunities. The Corporation relies on a large, stable core deposit base and a diversified base of wholesale funding sources to manage liquidity risk.
The Corporation’s primary source of liquidity is its core deposit base, raised though its retail branch system, along with unencumbered, or unpledged, investment securities. The Corporation also has available unused wholesale sources of liquidity, including advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank of Cincinnati, borrowings through the discount window at the Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland and access to certificates of deposit issued through brokers. Liquidity is also provided by unencumbered, or unpledged, investment securities that totaled $94,490 at June 30, 2011.
ITEM 4. Controls and Procedures
The Corporation’s Management carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Corporation’s disclosure controls and procedures (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) as of June 30, 2011, pursuant to the evaluation of these controls and procedures required by Rule 13a-15 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
Based upon that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer along with the Chief Financial Officer concluded that the Corporation’s disclosure controls and procedures as of June 30, 2011 were: (1) designed to ensure that material information relating to the Corporation and its subsidiaries is made known to the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer by others within the entities, and (2) effective, in that they provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed by the Corporation in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms. No change in the Corporation’s internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15(d)-15(f) under the Exchange Act) occurred during the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2011 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Corporation’s internal control over financial reporting.
PART II — OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
On April 18, 2008, the Corporation and Richard M. Osborne and certain other parties entered into a settlement agreement (the “Settlement Agreement”) to settle certain contested matters relating to the Corporation’s 2008 annual meeting of shareholders. Under the Settlement Agreement, among other things, Mr. Osborne agreed not to seek representation on the Corporation’s Board of Directors or to solicit proxies with respect to the voting of the Corporation’s common shares for a period of at least 18 months after April 18, 2008. In proxy materials filed with the SEC on March 20, 2010, Mr. Osborne indicated his intent to solicit proxies in favor of the election of two nominees for election as directors at the Corporation’s 2010 annual meeting of shareholders. On March 24, 2010, the Corporation filed a complaint against Mr. Osborne for a declaratory judgment and preliminary and permanent injunctive relief in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio, Eastern Division, to restrain Mr. Osborne from (a) engaging in any solicitation of proxies or consents, (b) seeking to advise, encourage or influence any person or entity with respect to the voting of any voting securities of the Corporation, (c) initiating, proposing or otherwise soliciting shareholders of the Corporation for the approval of shareholder proposals, (d) entering into any discussions, negotiations, agreements, arrangements or understanding with any third party with respect to any of the foregoing and (e) disseminating his proposed proxy materials to shareholders of the Corporation. The Corporation also sought an order from the Court temporarily restraining Mr. Osborne from engaging in any of the foregoing activities. On March 28, 2010, the Court issued an order granting the Corporation’s motion for a temporary restraining order. On April 3, 2010, the Court issued an order granting the Corporation’s motion for a preliminary injunction restraining Mr. Osborne from engaging in any of the foregoing activities. On February 15, 2010, Mr. Osborne filed a motion to dissolve the preliminary injunction, which the Corporation opposed. On March 23, 2010, the Court denied Mr. Osborne’s motion to dissolve the preliminary injunction. Prior to the Court’s decision, on March 19, 2010, Mr. Osborne filed a motion for summary judgment and the Corporation filed a motion for partial summary judgment. On April 14, 2010, Mr. Osborne filed an interlocutory appeal of the denial of his motion to dissolve the preliminary injunction with the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals. Proceedings in the District Court have been stayed pending resolution of Mr. Osborne’s appeal by the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals. On July 25, 2011, the Sixth Circuit affirmed the decision of the District Court and refused to dissolve the preliminary injunction. Once the Sixth Circuit makes its decision, the case will now be remanded to the District Court for the filing of dispositive motions and, if necessary, a trial on the merits.

48


Table of Contents

Item 1A. Risk Factors
In addition to the other information set forth in this report, you should carefully consider the risk factors disclosed in Item 1A of the Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.
Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
On July 28, 2005, the Corporation announced a share repurchase program of up to 5 percent, or about 332,000, of its common shares outstanding. Repurchased shares can be used for a number of corporate purposes, including the Corporation’s stock option and employee benefit plans. The share repurchase program provides that share repurchases are to be made primarily on the open market from time-to-time until the 5 percent maximum is repurchased or the earlier termination of the repurchase program by the Board of Directors, at the discretion of Management based upon market, business, legal and other factors. However, the terms of the Corporation’s sale of $25,223 of its series B preferred stock to the U.S. Treasury in December 2008 in conjunction with the TARP Capital Purchase Program include limitations on the Corporation’s ability to repurchase its common shares. For three years after the issuance or until the U.S. Treasury no longer holds any series B preferred stock, the Corporation will not be able to repurchase any of its common shares or preferred stock without, among other things, U.S. Treasury approval or the availability of certain limited exceptions, e.g., purchases in connection with the Corporation’s benefit plans. Furthermore, as long as the series B preferred stock issued to the U.S. Treasury is outstanding, repurchases or redemptions relating to certain equity securities, including the Corporation’s common shares, are prohibited until all accrued and unpaid dividends are paid on such preferred stock, subject to certain limited exceptions. As of June 30, 2011, the Corporation had repurchased an aggregate of 202,500 shares under this program.
Item 6. Exhibits.
     (a) The exhibits to this Form 10-Q are referenced in the Exhibit Index attached hereto.

49


Table of Contents

SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
         
  LNB BANCORP, INC.
(Registrant)
 
 
Date: August 8, 2011  /s/ Gary J. Elek    
  Gary J. Elek   
  Chief Financial Officer
(Duly Authorized Officer, and Principal
Financial and Accounting Officer) 
 

50


Table of Contents

         
Exhibit Index
     
Exhibit No.   Exhibit
31.1
  Chief Executive Officer Rule 13a -14(a)/15d -14(a) Certification.
 
   
31.2
  Chief Financial Officer Rule 13a -14(a)/15d -14(a) Certification.
 
   
32.1
  Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as enacted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
 
   
32.2
  Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as enacted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
 
   
101
  Financial statements from the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of LNB Bancorp, Inc. for the quarter ended June 30, 2011, formatted in XBRL (eXtensible Business Reporting Language): (i) Consolidated Balance Sheets at June 30, 2011 (unaudited) and December 31, 2010; (ii) Consolidated Statements of Income (unaudited) for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010; (iii) Consolidated Statements of Shareholders' Equity (unaudited) for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010; (iv) Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (unaudited) for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010; and (v) Notes to the Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements.

51