Attached files
file | filename |
---|---|
EXCEL - IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT - Park Sterling Corp | Financial_Report.xls |
EX-32.1 - EXHIBIT 32.1 - Park Sterling Corp | c19335exv32w1.htm |
EX-31.1 - EXHIBIT 31.1 - Park Sterling Corp | c19335exv31w1.htm |
EX-32.2 - EXHIBIT 32.2 - Park Sterling Corp | c19335exv32w2.htm |
EX-31.2 - EXHIBIT 31.2 - Park Sterling Corp | c19335exv31w2.htm |
Table of Contents
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D. C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
þ | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2011
or
o | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission File Number 001-35032
PARK STERLING CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
NORTH CAROLINA | 27-4107242 | |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) |
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
|
1043 E. Morehead Street, Suite 201 | ||
Charlotte, North Carolina | 28204 | |
(Address of principal executive offices) | (Zip Code) |
(704) 716-2134
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports),
and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every
Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the
preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller
reporting company. See the definitions of large accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2
of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer o | Accelerated Filer o | Non-accelerated filer o | Smaller reporting company þ | |||
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No þ
As
of August 3, 2011, the registrant had outstanding 28,619,358 shares of common stock, $1.00 par value per share.
PARK STERLING CORPORATION
Table of Contents
Table of Contents
PARK STERLING CORPORATION
Part I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. | Financial Statements |
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(Unaudited)
(Dollars in thousands)
(Dollars in thousands)
June 30, | December 31, | |||||||
2011 | 2010* | |||||||
ASSETS |
||||||||
Cash and due from banks |
$ | 14,349 | $ | 2,433 | ||||
Interest-earning balances at banks |
8,571 | 5,040 | ||||||
Federal funds sold |
44,060 | 57,905 | ||||||
Investment securities available-for-sale, at fair value |
146,734 | 140,590 | ||||||
Loans held for sale |
1,600 | | ||||||
Loans |
380,365 | 399,829 | ||||||
Allowance for loan losses |
(11,277 | ) | (12,424 | ) | ||||
Net loans |
369,088 | 387,405 | ||||||
Federal Home Loan Bank stock |
1,882 | 1,757 | ||||||
Premises and equipment, net |
4,862 | 4,477 | ||||||
Accrued interest receivable |
1,462 | 1,640 | ||||||
Other real estate owned |
3,470 | 1,246 | ||||||
Other assets |
14,590 | 13,615 | ||||||
Total assets |
$ | 610,668 | $ | 616,108 | ||||
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY |
||||||||
Deposits: |
||||||||
Noninterest-bearing demand deposits |
$ | 42,156 | $ | 36,333 | ||||
Money market, NOW and savings deposits |
110,874 | 71,666 | ||||||
Time deposits of less than $100,000 |
59,969 | 78,242 | ||||||
Time deposits of $100,000 through $250,000 |
68,049 | 79,020 | ||||||
Time deposits of more than $250,000 |
122,858 | 142,559 | ||||||
Total deposits |
403,906 | 407,820 | ||||||
Short-term borrowings |
1,661 | 874 | ||||||
FHLB advances |
20,000 | 20,000 | ||||||
Subordinated debt |
6,895 | 6,895 | ||||||
Accrued interest payable |
201 | 290 | ||||||
Accrued expenses and other liabilities |
4,421 | 3,128 | ||||||
Total liabilities |
437,084 | 439,007 | ||||||
Shareholders equity: |
||||||||
Preferred stock, no par value
5,000,000 shares authorized; -0- issued and outdstanding at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively |
| | ||||||
Common stock, $1.00 par value
200,000,000 shares authorized at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010; 28,619,358 and 28,051,098 shares outstanding at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively |
28,619 | 28,051 | ||||||
Additional paid-in capital |
159,890 | 159,489 | ||||||
Accumulated deficit |
(15,502 | ) | (9,501 | ) | ||||
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) |
577 | (938 | ) | |||||
Total shareholders equity |
173,584 | 177,101 | ||||||
Total liabilities and shareholders equity |
$ | 610,668 | $ | 616,108 | ||||
* | Derived from audited financial statements. |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
2
Table of Contents
PARK STERLING CORPORATION
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME (LOSS)
(Unaudited)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
June 30, | June 30, | |||||||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | |||||||||||||
Interest income |
||||||||||||||||
Loans, including fees |
$ | 4,450 | $ | 5,169 | $ | 9,208 | $ | 10,312 | ||||||||
Federal funds sold |
33 | 9 | 63 | 18 | ||||||||||||
Taxable investment securities |
684 | 285 | 1,365 | 611 | ||||||||||||
Tax-exempt investment securities |
181 | 160 | 352 | 320 | ||||||||||||
Interest on deposits at banks |
11 | 15 | 25 | 28 | ||||||||||||
Total interest income |
5,359 | 5,638 | 11,013 | 11,289 | ||||||||||||
Interest expense |
||||||||||||||||
Money market, NOW and savings deposits |
176 | 89 | 317 | 172 | ||||||||||||
Time deposits |
1,080 | 1,460 | 2,306 | 2,944 | ||||||||||||
Short-term borrowings |
1 | 3 | 1 | 8 | ||||||||||||
FHLB advances |
141 | 141 | 282 | 279 | ||||||||||||
Subordinated debt |
189 | 189 | 379 | 379 | ||||||||||||
Total interest expense |
1,587 | 1,882 | 3,285 | 3,782 | ||||||||||||
Net interest income |
3,772 | 3,756 | 7,728 | 7,507 | ||||||||||||
Provision for loan losses |
3,245 | 1,094 | 7,707 | 2,625 | ||||||||||||
Net interest income (loss) after provision for loan losses |
527 | 2,662 | 21 | 4,882 | ||||||||||||
Noninterest income |
||||||||||||||||
Service charges on deposit accounts |
25 | 15 | 51 | 29 | ||||||||||||
Gain on sale of securities available-for-sale |
1 | 1 | 20 | 19 | ||||||||||||
Other noninterest income |
18 | 8 | 45 | 14 | ||||||||||||
Total noninterest income |
44 | 24 | 116 | 62 | ||||||||||||
Noninterest expense |
||||||||||||||||
Salaries and employee benefits |
2,975 | 1,299 | 5,482 | 2,551 | ||||||||||||
Occupancy and equipment |
301 | 224 | 557 | 430 | ||||||||||||
Advertising and promotion |
87 | 96 | 125 | 153 | ||||||||||||
Legal and professional fees |
1,205 | 83 | 1,512 | 159 | ||||||||||||
Deposit charges and FDIC insurance |
196 | 182 | 483 | 358 | ||||||||||||
Data processing and outside service fees |
128 | 100 | 251 | 193 | ||||||||||||
Director fees |
45 | 47 | 86 | 47 | ||||||||||||
Net cost of operation of other real estate |
93 | 239 | 328 | 275 | ||||||||||||
Other noninterest expense |
444 | 207 | 884 | 353 | ||||||||||||
Total noninterest expense |
5,474 | 2,477 | 9,708 | 4,519 | ||||||||||||
Income (loss) before income taxes |
(4,903 | ) | 209 | (9,571 | ) | 425 | ||||||||||
Income tax expense (benefit) |
(1,789 | ) | 36 | (3,570 | ) | 95 | ||||||||||
Net income (loss) |
$ | (3,114 | ) | $ | 173 | $ | (6,001 | ) | $ | 330 | ||||||
Basic earnings (loss) per common share |
$ | (0.11 | ) | $ | 0.03 | $ | (0.21 | ) | $ | 0.07 | ||||||
Diluted earnings (loss) per common share |
$ | (0.11 | ) | $ | 0.03 | $ | (0.21 | ) | $ | 0.07 | ||||||
Weighted-average common shares outstanding |
||||||||||||||||
Basic |
28,051,098 | 4,951,098 | 28,051,098 | 4,951,098 | ||||||||||||
Diluted |
28,051,098 | 4,951,098 | 28,051,098 | 4,951,098 | ||||||||||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
3
Table of Contents
PARK STERLING CORPORATION
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
(Unaudited)
Six Months Ended June 30, 2011 and 2010
(Dollars in thousands)
Six Months Ended June 30, 2011 and 2010
(Dollars in thousands)
Accumulated | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Additional | Other | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Common Stock | Paid-In | Accumulated | Comprehensive | Shareholders | ||||||||||||||||||||
Shares | Amount | Capital | Deficit | Income (Loss) | Equity | |||||||||||||||||||
Balance at December 31, 2009 |
4,951,098 | $ | 23,023 | $ | 23,496 | $ | (1,642 | ) | $ | 1,218 | $ | 46,095 | ||||||||||||
Share-based compensation expense |
| | 190 | | | 190 | ||||||||||||||||||
Comprehensive income (loss): |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net income |
| | | 330 | | 330 | ||||||||||||||||||
Unrealized holding gains on
available-for-sale securities,
net of taxes |
| | | | 469 | 469 | ||||||||||||||||||
Unrealized holding losses on
interest rate swaps, net of taxes |
| | | | (394 | ) | (394 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Total comprehensive income (loss) |
| | | | | 405 | ||||||||||||||||||
Balance at June 30, 2010 |
4,951,098 | $ | 23,023 | $ | 23,686 | $ | (1,312 | ) | $ | 1,293 | $ | 46,690 | ||||||||||||
Balance at December 31, 2010 |
28,051,098 | $ | 28,051 | $ | 159,489 | $ | (9,501 | ) | $ | (938 | ) | $ | 177,101 | |||||||||||
Issuance of restricted stock
grants |
568,260 | 568 | (568 | ) | | | | |||||||||||||||||
Share-based compensation expense |
| | 969 | | | 969 | ||||||||||||||||||
Comprehensive income (loss): |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net loss |
| | | (6,001 | ) | | (6,001 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Unrealized holding gains on
available-for-sale securities,
net of taxes |
| | | | 1,797 | 1,797 | ||||||||||||||||||
Unrealized holding losses on
interest rate swaps, net of taxes |
| | | | (282 | ) | (282 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Total comprehensive income (loss) |
| | | | | (4,486 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Balance at June 30, 2011 |
28,619,358 | $ | 28,619 | $ | 159,890 | $ | (15,502 | ) | $ | 577 | $ | 173,584 | ||||||||||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements.
4
Table of Contents
PARK STERLING CORPORATION
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
(Dollars in thousands)
(Dollars in thousands)
Six Months Ended | ||||||||
June 30, | ||||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
Cash flows from operating activities |
||||||||
Net income (loss) |
$ | (6,001 | ) | $ | 330 | |||
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net
cash provided by operating activities: |
||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
771 | 233 | ||||||
Provision for loan losses |
7,707 | 2,625 | ||||||
Share-based compensation expense |
969 | 190 | ||||||
Income on termination of swap |
| (352 | ) | |||||
Gain on sales of investment securities available-for-sale |
(20 | ) | (19 | ) | ||||
Gain (loss) on sales of other real estate |
(3 | ) | 223 | |||||
Writedowns to other real estate |
301 | | ||||||
Loans held for sale |
(1,600 | ) | | |||||
Change in assets and liabilities: |
||||||||
Decrease in accrued interest receivable |
178 | 117 | ||||||
Decrease in other assets |
(2,383 | ) | (327 | ) | ||||
Decrease in accrued interest payable |
(89 | ) | (146 | ) | ||||
Increase in accrued expenses and other liabilities |
1,293 | 87 | ||||||
Net cash provided by operating activities |
1,123 | 2,961 | ||||||
Cash flows from investing activities |
||||||||
Net decrease (increase) in loans |
6,924 | (4,621 | ) | |||||
Purchases of bank premises and equipment |
(573 | ) | (109 | ) | ||||
Purchases of investment securities available-for-sale |
(46,940 | ) | (4,233 | ) | ||||
Proceeds from sales of investment securities available-for-sale |
24,316 | 5,163 | ||||||
Proceeds from maturities and call of investment securities available-for-sale |
18,931 | 2,052 | ||||||
Proceeds from sale of other real estate |
1,073 | 2,655 | ||||||
Improvements to other real estate |
| (93 | ) | |||||
Purchase of Federal Home Loan Bank stock |
(125 | ) | | |||||
Net cash provided by investing activities |
3,606 | 814 | ||||||
Cash flows from financing activities |
||||||||
Net (decrease) increase in deposits |
(3,914 | ) | 19,150 | |||||
Increase (decrease) in short-term borrowings |
787 | (5,227 | ) | |||||
Net cash (used by) provided by financing activities |
(3,127 | ) | 13,923 | |||||
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents |
1,602 | 17,698 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning |
65,378 | 23,237 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents, ending |
$ | 66,980 | $ | 40,935 | ||||
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information: |
||||||||
Cash paid for interest |
$ | 3,374 | $ | 3,928 | ||||
Cash paid for income taxes |
| 64 | ||||||
Supplemental disclosure of noncash investing and financing activities: |
||||||||
Change in unrealized gain on available-for-sale securities, net of tax |
$ | 1,797 | $ | 469 | ||||
Change in unrealized loss on swap, net of tax |
(282 | ) | (394 | ) | ||||
Loans transferred to other real estate owned |
3,595 | 1,769 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
5
Table of Contents
PARK STERLING CORPORATION
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
Note 1 Basis of Presentation
Park Sterling Corporation (the Company) was formed on October 6, 2010 to serve as the
holding company for Park Sterling Bank (the Bank) and is a bank holding company registered with
the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (the Federal Reserve Board) under the Bank
Holding Company Act (the BHC Act). On January 1, 2011, the Company acquired all of the
outstanding stock of the Bank in a statutory exchange transaction (the Reorganization). Prior to
January 1, 2011, the Company conducted no operations other than obtaining regulatory approval for
the Reorganization. The information in the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements
and accompanying notes for all periods prior to January 1, 2011 is that of the Bank on a
stand-alone basis.
The Bank was incorporated on September 8, 2006, as a North Carolina-chartered commercial bank
and began operations in October 2006. The Banks primary focus is to provide banking services to
small and mid-sized businesses, owner-occupied and income producing real estate owners,
professionals and other customers doing business or residing within its target markets. The Bank
operates under the banking laws of North Carolina and the rules and regulations of the Federal
Deposit Insurance Corporation (the FDIC) and the State of North Carolina Office of the
Commissioner of Banks (the NC Commissioner). The Bank undergoes periodic examinations by those
regulatory authorities.
On March 30, 2011, the Company and Community Capital Corporation (Community Capital) entered
into an Agreement and Plan of Merger, pursuant to which Community Capital will be merged with and
into the Company, with the Company as the surviving entity. The merger has been unanimously
approved by the board of directors of each company and the Company has received approval of the
merger from the Federal Reserve Board and the South Carolina State Board of Financial Institutions
(the SC Board). The merger is subject to customer closing conditions, including Community Capital
shareholder approval. If the merger is completed, each outstanding share of Community Capital
common stock will be exchanged for either 0.6667 of a share of Company common stock or $3.30 in
cash, subject to the limitation that the total consideration will consist of 40.0% in cash and
60.0% in shares of Company common stock.
The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements and notes have been
prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (GAAP)
for interim financial information and the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation
S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information or footnotes necessary for a complete
presentation of financial position, results of operations and cash flows in conformity with GAAP.
Because the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements do not include all
of the information and footnotes required by GAAP, they should be read in conjunction with the
Companys audited consolidated financial statements and accompanying footnotes (the 2010 Audited
Financial Statements) included in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year
ended December 31, 2010 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) on March 31, 2011
(the 2010 Form 10-K).
In managements opinion, the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial
statements reflect all normal, recurring adjustments necessary to present fairly the financial
position of the Company as of June 30, 2011, and the results of operations and cash flows for the
three- and six-months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010. Operating results for the six-month period
ended June 30, 2011 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year
or for other interim periods.
Tabular information, other than share and per share data, is presented in thousands of
dollars.
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make
estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the unaudited condensed consolidated
financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Material estimates that are susceptible to significant change in the near term are the valuation of
the allowance for loan losses, determination of the need for a deferred tax asset valuation
allowance and the fair value of financial instruments and other accounts.
Certain amounts reported in prior periods have been reclassified to conform to the current
period presentation.
6
Table of Contents
PARK STERLING CORPORATION
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
Note 2 Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In January 2010, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards
Update Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (Topic 820): Improving Disclosures about Fair Value
Measurement (ASU No. 2010-06). ASU No. 2010-06 requires some new disclosures and clarifies some
existing disclosure requirements about fair value measurement as set forth in FASB Accounting
Standards Codification Subtopic 820-10. The FASBs objective is to improve these disclosures and,
thus, increase transparency in financial reporting.
Specifically, ASU No. 2010-06 amends Codification Subtopic 820-10 to now require that: (1) a
reporting entity disclose separately the amounts of significant transfers in and out of Level 1 and
Level 2 fair value measurements and describe the reasons for the transfers; and (2) a reporting
entity present separately information about purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements in the
reconciliation for fair value measurements using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3). In
addition, ASU No. 2010-06 clarifies the requirements for purposes of reporting fair value
measurement for each class of assets and liabilities, and that a reporting entity needs to use
judgment in determining the appropriate classes of assets and liabilities and should provide
disclosures about the valuation techniques and inputs used to measure fair value for both recurring
and nonrecurring fair value measurements. ASU No. 2010-06 became effective for interim and annual
reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2009, except for the disclosures about purchases,
sales, issuances, and settlements in the roll forward of activity in Level 3 fair value
measurements which are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2010, and for
interim periods within those fiscal years. The Company adopted the fair value disclosures guidance
on January 1, 2010, except for the gross presentation of the Level 3 rollforward information, which
was adopted by the Company on January 1, 2011. The adoption of the gross presentation disclosures
did not have an impact on the Companys financial position or results of operations.
In July 2010, the FASB issued ASU No. 2010-20, Disclosures about the Credit Quality of
Financing Receivables and the Allowance for Credit Losses (Topic 310) (ASU No. 2010-20). ASU No.
2010-20 will require the Company to provide a greater level of disaggregated information about the
credit quality of the Companys loans and the Allowance for Loan Losses (the Allowance). ASU No.
2010-20 requires the Company to disclose additional information related to credit quality
indicators, past due information, and information related to loans modified in a troubled debt
restructuring. The provisions of ASU No. 2010-20 were effective for the Companys reporting period
ending December 31, 2010. As this ASU amends only the disclosure requirements for loans and the
Allowance, the adoption had no material impact on the Companys financial condition or results of
operations.
In April 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-02, A Creditors Determination of Whether a
Restructuring Is a Troubled Debt Restructuring (Topic 310) (ASU No. 2011-02). ASU No. 2011-02
provides greater clarity and guidance to assist creditors in determining whether a creditor has
granted a concession and whether a debtor is experiencing financial difficulties for purposes of
determining whether a restructuring constitutes a troubled debt restructuring. As a result of
applying these amendments, the Company may identify receivables that are newly considered impaired.
For purposes of measuring impairment of those receivables, the amendments will be applied
prospectively for the first interim or annual period beginning on or after June 15, 2011. The
Company will be required to disclose the total amount of receivables and the allowance for credit
losses as of the end of the period of adoption related to those receivables that are newly
considered impaired under Section 310-10-35 (FAS 114) for which impairment was previously measured
under Subtopic 450-20, Contingencies: Loss Contingencies (FAS 5). The provisions of ASU No. 2011-02
are effective for the Companys reporting period ending September 30, 2011. Management is still
evaluating the impact of this ASU on the Companys financial condition.
7
Table of Contents
PARK STERLING CORPORATION
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
In June 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-05, Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Presentation
of Comprehensive Income (ASU No. 2011-05). ASU No. 2011-05 requires an entity to present the
total of comprehensive income, the components of net income and the components of other
comprehensive income either in a single continuous statement of comprehensive income or in two
separate but consecutive statements. ASU 2011-05 eliminates the option to present the components of
other comprehensive income as part of the statement of equity. ASU 2011-05 is effective for fiscal
years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning on or after December 15, 2011, with
early adoption permitted. Management is evaluating the impact of this ASU on the Companys
consolidated financial statements.
Note 3 Shareholders Equity
Common Stock
On May 4, 2010, the Banks shareholders approved an amendment to the Articles of Incorporation
of the Bank to increase the number of authorized shares of common stock to 200,000,000.
On August 18, 2010, in connection with its public offering of common stock (the Public
Offering), the Bank consummated the issuance and sale of 23,100,000 shares of common stock at
$6.50 per share, for a gross aggregate offering price of $150.2 million. The Bank incurred
underwriting fees of $6.0 million and related expenses of $0.9 million resulting in net proceeds of
$143.2 million being received by the Bank of which $140.2 was recorded in shareholders equity.
Additional underwriting fees equal to $3.0 million will be payable in the future if the common
stock price closes at a price equal to or above 125% of the offering price, or $8.125 per share,
for a period of 30 consecutive days. A liability for the $3.0 million contingent underwriting fee
has been accrued and is included in other liabilities in the accompanying balance sheet at June 30,
2011.
On January 1, 2011, in conjunction with the Companys acquisition of the Bank in a statutory
exchange transaction, the par value of authorized common stock of the Company, which was
established in the Companys Articles of Incorporation at $1.00 per share, replaced the previously
reported par value of $4.65 per share of common stock of the Bank. This transaction was given
retroactive effect in the financial statements. As such, the par value of the common stock
reflected in the consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2010 reflects a $102.4 million
reclassification from common stock to additional paid-in capital as a result of the Reorganization.
Share-Based Plans
The Company may grant share-based compensation to employees and non-employee directors in the
form of stock options, restricted stock or other stock-based awards. Share-based compensation
expense is measured based on the fair value of the award at the date of grant and is charged to
earnings on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period, which is currently up to seven
years. The fair value of stock options is estimated at the date of grant using a Black-Scholes
option-pricing model and related assumptions. The amortization of share-based compensation reflects
estimated forfeitures, adjusted for actual forfeiture experience. The fair value of restricted
stock awards, subject to share price performance vesting requirements, is estimated using a Monte
Carlo simulation and related estimated assumptions for volatility and a risk free interest rate.
8
Table of Contents
PARK STERLING CORPORATION
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
The Company maintains equity-based compensation plans for directors and employees. During
2010, the Board of Directors of the Bank adopted and shareholders approved the Park Sterling Bank
2010 Stock Option Plan for Directors and the Park Sterling Bank 2010 Employee Stock Option Plan
(the 2010 Plans). The 2010 Plans are substantially similar to the Banks 2006 option plans for
directors and employees, which provided for an aggregate of 990,000 of common shares reserved for
options. The 2010 Plans provide for an aggregate of 1,859,550 of common shares reserved for
options. Upon effectiveness of the Reorganization, the Company assumed all outstanding options
under the 2010 plans and the 2006 plans, and the Companys common stock was substituted as the
stock issuable upon the exercise of options under these plans.
Also during 2010, the Board of Directors of the Company adopted and shareholders approved the
Park Sterling Corporation 2010 Long-Term Incentive Plan for directors and employees (the LTIP),
which was effective upon the Reorganization and replaced the 2010 Plans. The LTIP provides for an
aggregate of 1,016,400 of common shares reserved for issuance to employees and directors in
connection with stock options, stock appreciation rights and other stock-based awards (including,
without limitation, restricted stock awards).
Activity in the Companys shared based plans is summarized in the following table:
Outstanding Options | Nonvested Restricted Shares | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Shares | Weighted | Weighted | Weighted | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Available | Average | Average | Average | Aggregate | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
for Future | Number | Exercise | Contractual | Intrinsic | Number | Grant Date | Intrinsic | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Grants | Outstanding | Price | Term (Years) | Value | Outstanding | Fair Value | Value | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
At December 31, 2010 |
525,918 | 2,323,632 | $ | 7.83 | 8.50 | $ | | | $ | | $ | | ||||||||||||||||||||
Replacement of 2010 Plans |
(525,918 | ) | | | | | | | | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Approved for issuance |
1,016,400 | | | | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Options Granted |
(109,340 | ) | 109,340 | 5.56 | | 1,205 | | | | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Restricted Shares Granted |
(568,260 | ) | | | | | 568,260 | 3.91 | 2,818,570 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Exercised |
| | | | | | | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Expired and forfeited |
| (242,908 | ) | 7.21 | | | | | | |||||||||||||||||||||||
At June 30, 2011 |
338,800 | 2,190,064 | $ | 7.78 | 8.08 | $ | 1,205 | 568,260 | $ | 3.91 | $ | 2,818,570 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Exercisable at June 30, 2011 |
726,827 | $ | 10.49 | 5.81 | $ | |
The fair value of options is estimated at the date of the grant using the Black-Scholes
option-pricing model and expensed over the options vesting periods. The following weighted-average
assumptions were used in valuing options issued during the six months ended June 30, 2011.
Assumptions in Estimating Option Values
Weighted-average volatility |
31.13 | % | ||
Expected dividend yield |
0 | % | ||
Risk-free interest rate |
3.95 | % | ||
Expected life |
7 years |
Approximately 7,750 options vested during the six months ended June 30, 2011; no options
vested for the six months ended June 30, 2010. The compensation expense for stock option plans was
$256 thousand and $87 thousand for the three months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively, and
$566 thousand and $190 thousand for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. At
June 30, 2011, unrecognized compensation cost related to nonvested stock options of $2.7 million is
expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 1.20 years.
9
Table of Contents
PARK STERLING CORPORATION
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
No shares of restricted stock vested during the six months ended June 30, 2011. The
compensation expense for restricted shares was $267 thousand and $403 thousand for the three and
six months ended June 30, 2011, respectively. At June 30, 2011, unrecognized compensation cost
related to nonvested restricted shares of $2.0 million is expected to be recognized over a
weighted-average period of 3.23 years. There were no shares of restricted stock granted as of June
30, 2010.
Note 4 Investment Securities
The amortized cost, unrealized gains and losses, and estimated fair value of securities
available-for-sale at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 are as follows:
Amortized Cost and Fair Value of Investment Portfolio
Gross | Gross | |||||||||||||||
Amortized | Unrealized | Unrealized | Fair | |||||||||||||
Cost | Gains | Losses | Value | |||||||||||||
June 30, 2011 |
||||||||||||||||
Securities available-for-sale: |
||||||||||||||||
U.S. Government agencies |
$ | 15,524 | $ | 50 | $ | | $ | 15,574 | ||||||||
Residential mortgage-backed securities |
59,819 | 797 | (137 | ) | 60,479 | |||||||||||
Collateralized agency mortgage obligations |
54,440 | 278 | (479 | ) | 54,239 | |||||||||||
Municipal securities |
15,512 | 533 | (3 | ) | 16,042 | |||||||||||
Corporate and other securities |
500 | | (100 | ) | 400 | |||||||||||
Total investment securities |
$ | 145,795 | $ | 1,658 | $ | (719 | ) | $ | 146,734 | |||||||
December 31, 2010 |
||||||||||||||||
Securities available-for-sale: |
||||||||||||||||
U.S. Government agencies |
$ | 13,075 | $ | 181 | $ | (96 | ) | $ | 13,160 | |||||||
Residential mortgage-backed securities |
52,342 | 495 | (438 | ) | 52,399 | |||||||||||
Collateralized agency mortgage obligations |
60,711 | 111 | (2,103 | ) | 58,719 | |||||||||||
Municipal securities |
13,771 | 183 | (146 | ) | 13,808 | |||||||||||
Corporate and other securities |
2,675 | 5 | (176 | ) | 2,504 | |||||||||||
Total investment securities |
$ | 142,574 | $ | 975 | $ | (2,959 | ) | $ | 140,590 | |||||||
The amortized cost and fair values of securities available-for-sale at June 30, 2011 by
contractual maturity are shown below. Expected maturities will differ from contractual maturities
because borrowers may have the right to call or prepay obligations with or without call or
prepayment penalties. All of the Companys residential mortgage-backed securities are backed by an
agency of the U.S. government. The Company did not own any commercial mortgage-backed securities as
of June 30, 2011 or December 31, 2010.
10
Table of Contents
PARK STERLING CORPORATION
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
Maturities of Investment Portfolio
June 30, 2011 | ||||||||
Amortized | Fair | |||||||
Cost | Value | |||||||
U.S. Government agencies |
||||||||
Due one year or less |
$ | 14,999 | $ | 15,000 | ||||
Due after five years through ten years |
525 | 574 | ||||||
Residential mortgage-backed securities |
||||||||
Due after five years through ten years |
1,225 | 1,255 | ||||||
Due after ten years |
58,594 | 59,224 | ||||||
Collateralized agency mortgage obligations |
||||||||
Due after ten years |
54,440 | 54,239 | ||||||
Municipal securities |
||||||||
Due after ten years |
15,512 | 16,042 | ||||||
Corporate and other securities |
||||||||
Due after five years through ten years |
500 | 400 | ||||||
Due after ten years |
| | ||||||
Total investment securites |
$ | 145,795 | $ | 146,734 | ||||
Management periodically evaluates each investment security for other than temporary
impairment, relying primarily on industry analyst reports, observation of market conditions and
interest rate fluctuations. The following table shows gross unrealized losses and fair value,
aggregated by investment category and length of time that the individual securities have been in a
continuous unrealized loss position, for investment securities with unrealized losses at June 30,
2011 and December 31, 2010. The unrealized losses relate to debt securities that have incurred fair
value reductions due to market volatility and uncertainty since the securities were purchased.
Management believes that the unrealized losses are more likely than not to reverse as confidence
returns to investment markets. Since none of the unrealized losses relate to the marketability of
the securities or the issuers ability to honor redemption obligations, and it is more likely than
not that the Company will not have to sell the investments before recovery of their amortized cost
basis, none of the securities are deemed to be other than temporarily impaired. One corporate debt
security has been in a loss position for twelve months or more at June 30, 2011. At December 31,
2010, two corporate debt securities were in a loss position for twelve months or more.
11
Table of Contents
PARK STERLING CORPORATION
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
Investment Portfolio Gross Unrealized Losses and Fair Value
Less Than 12 Months | 12 Months or More | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Fair | Unrealized | Fair | Unrealized | Fair | Unrealized | |||||||||||||||||||
Value | Losses | Value | Losses | Value | Losses | |||||||||||||||||||
June 30, 2011 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Securities available-for-sale: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Residential Mortgage-backed securities |
$ | 17,491 | $ | (137 | ) | $ | | $ | | $ | 17,491 | $ | (137 | ) | ||||||||||
Collateralized mortgage obligations |
24,519 | (479 | ) | | | 24,519 | (479 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Municipal securities |
509 | (3 | ) | | | 509 | (3 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Corporate and other securities |
| | 400 | (100 | ) | 400 | (100 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Total temporarily impaired
securities |
$ | 42,519 | $ | (619 | ) | $ | 400 | $ | (100 | ) | $ | 42,919 | $ | (719 | ) | |||||||||
December 31, 2010 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Securities available-for-sale: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
U.S. Government agencies |
$ | 9,904 | $ | (96 | ) | $ | | $ | | $ | 9,904 | $ | (96 | ) | ||||||||||
Residential Mortgage-backed securities |
37,052 | (438 | ) | | | 37,052 | (438 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Collateralized mortgage obligations |
53,232 | (2,103 | ) | | | 53,232 | (2,103 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Municipal securities |
6,215 | (146 | ) | | | 6,215 | (146 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Corporate and other securities |
| | 1,475 | (176 | ) | 1,475 | (176 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Total temporarily impaired
securities |
$ | 106,403 | $ | (2,783 | ) | $ | 1,475 | $ | (176 | ) | $ | 107,878 | $ | (2,959 | ) | |||||||||
Securities with a fair value of $4.2 million and $4.2 million at June 30, 2011 and
December 31, 2010, respectively, were pledged to secure an interest rate swap and securities sold
under agreements to repurchase. During the six months ended June 30, 2011, the Company sold $24.3
million of securities available-for-sale, resulting in a gross gain of $0.02 million. Securities
available-for-sale with a book value of $5.2 million were sold in the six months ended June 30,
2010 resulting in a gross gain of $0.02 million.
The aggregate cost of the Companys cost method investments totaled $2.0 million at June 30,
2011 and $2.3 million at December 31, 2010. Cost method investments at June 30, 2011 included $1.9
million in Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB) stock and $0.1 million of other investments which are
included in other assets. All cost method investments were evaluated for impairment as of June 30,
2011 and December 31, 2010. The following factors have been considered in determining the carrying
amount of FHLB stock: 1) managements current belief that the Company has sufficient liquidity to
meet all operational needs in the foreseeable future and would not need to dispose of the stock
below recorded amounts, 2) managements belief that the FHLB has the ability to absorb economic
losses given the expectation that the FHLB has a high degree of government support and 3)
redemptions and purchases of the stock are at the discretion of the FHLB. At June 30, 2011 and
December 31, 2010, the Company estimated that the fair values of cost method investments equaled or
exceeded the cost of each of these investments, and, therefore, the investments were not impaired.
12
Table of Contents
PARK STERLING CORPORATION
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
Note 5 Loans and Allowance for Loan Losses
The following is a summary of the loan portfolio at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010:
June 30, | December 31, | |||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
Commercial: |
||||||||
Commercial and industrial |
$ | 45,056 | $ | 48,401 | ||||
Commercial real estate owner-occupied |
61,878 | 55,089 | ||||||
Commercial real estate investor income producing |
111,349 | 110,407 | ||||||
Acquisition, construction and development |
64,662 | 87,846 | ||||||
Other commercial |
6,840 | 3,225 | ||||||
Total commercial loans |
289,785 | 304,968 | ||||||
Consumer: |
||||||||
Residential mortgage |
21,767 | 21,716 | ||||||
Home equity lines of credit |
56,481 | 56,968 | ||||||
Residential construction |
6,048 | 9,051 | ||||||
Other loans to individuals |
6,494 | 7,245 | ||||||
Total consumer loans |
90,790 | 94,980 | ||||||
Total loans |
380,575 | 399,948 | ||||||
Deferred fees |
(210 | ) | (119 | ) | ||||
Total loans, net of deferred fees |
$ | 380,365 | $ | 399,829 | ||||
At June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the carrying value of loans pledged as collateral
on FHLB borrowings totaled $50.5 million and $43.8 million, respectively.
Concentrations of Credit Loans are primarily made in the Charlotte and Wilmington regions of
North Carolina. Real estate loans can be affected by the condition of the local real estate market.
Commercial and industrial loans can be affected by the local economic conditions. The commercial
loan portfolio has concentrations in business loans secured by real estate and real estate
development loans. Primary concentrations in the consumer loan portfolio include home equity lines
of credit and residential mortgages. At June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the Company had no
loans outstanding with non-U.S. entities.
Allowance for Loan Losses The following table presents, by portfolio segment, the activity
in the allowance for loan losses for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011. The following
table also presents, by portfolio segment, the balance in the allowance for loan losses
disaggregated based on the Companys impairment measurement method and the related recorded
investment in loans at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010.
13
Table of Contents
PARK STERLING CORPORATION
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
Commercial | Consumer | Unallocated | Total | |||||||||||||
For the three months ended June 30, 2011 |
||||||||||||||||
Allowance for Loan Losses: |
||||||||||||||||
Balance, beginning of period |
$ | 8,034 | $ | 1,875 | $ | 1,859 | $ | 11,768 | ||||||||
Provision for loan losses |
3,138 | 103 | 4 | 3,245 | ||||||||||||
Charge-offs |
(3,486 | ) | (610 | ) | | (4,096 | ) | |||||||||
Recoveries |
350 | 10 | | 360 | ||||||||||||
Net charge-offs |
(3,136 | ) | (600 | ) | | (3,736 | ) | |||||||||
Ending balance |
$ | 8,036 | $ | 1,378 | $ | 1,863 | $ | 11,277 | ||||||||
For the six months ended June 30, 2011 |
||||||||||||||||
Allowance for Loan Losses: |
||||||||||||||||
Balance, beginning of period |
$ | 9,165 | $ | 1,375 | $ | 1,884 | $ | 12,424 | ||||||||
Provision for loan losses |
5,842 | 1,886 | (21 | ) | 7,707 | |||||||||||
Charge-offs |
(7,781 | ) | (1,896 | ) | | (9,677 | ) | |||||||||
Recoveries |
810 | 13 | | 823 | ||||||||||||
Net charge-offs |
(6,971 | ) | (1,883 | ) | | (8,854 | ) | |||||||||
Ending balance |
$ | 8,036 | $ | 1,378 | $ | 1,863 | $ | 11,277 | ||||||||
At June 30, 2011 |
||||||||||||||||
Allowance for Loan Losses: |
||||||||||||||||
Individually evaluated for impairment |
$ | 1,871 | $ | 80 | $ | | $ | 1,951 | ||||||||
Collectively evaluated for impairment |
6,108 | 1,355 | 1,863 | 9,326 | ||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 7,979 | $ | 1,435 | $ | 1,863 | $ | 11,277 | ||||||||
Recorded Investment in Loans: |
||||||||||||||||
Individually evaluated for impairment |
$ | 24,565 | $ | 1,000 | $ | | $ | 25,565 | ||||||||
Collectively evaluated for impairment |
265,220 | 89,790 | | 355,010 | ||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 289,785 | $ | 90,790 | $ | | $ | 380,575 | ||||||||
At December 31, 2010 |
||||||||||||||||
Allowance for Loan Losses: |
||||||||||||||||
Individually evaluated for impairment |
$ | 4,092 | $ | 115 | $ | | $ | 4,207 | ||||||||
Collectively evaluated for impairment |
5,073 | 1,260 | 1,884 | 8,217 | ||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 9,165 | $ | 1,375 | $ | 1,884 | $ | 12,424 | ||||||||
Recorded Investment in Loans: |
||||||||||||||||
Individually evaluated for impairment |
$ | 37,451 | $ | 3,460 | $ | | $ | 40,911 | ||||||||
Collectively evaluated for impairment |
267,517 | 91,520 | | 359,037 | ||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 304,968 | $ | 94,980 | $ | | $ | 399,948 | ||||||||
A summary of the activity in the allowance for loan losses for the three- and six-month
periods ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 follows:
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
June 30, | June 30, | |||||||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | |||||||||||||
Balance, beginning of period |
$ | 11,768 | $ | 8,380 | $ | 12,424 | $ | 7,402 | ||||||||
Provision for loan losses |
3,245 | 1,094 | 7,707 | 2,625 | ||||||||||||
Charge-offs |
(4,096 | ) | (502 | ) | (9,677 | ) | (1,056 | ) | ||||||||
Recoveries |
360 | 2 | 823 | 3 | ||||||||||||
Net charge-offs |
(3,736 | ) | (500 | ) | (8,854 | ) | (1,053 | ) | ||||||||
Balance, end of period |
$ | 11,277 | $ | 8,974 | $ | 11,277 | $ | 8,974 | ||||||||
14
Table of Contents
PARK STERLING CORPORATION
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
The Companys loan loss allowance methodology includes a comprehensive qualitative
component. Qualitative reserves represent an estimate of the amount for which it is probable that
environmental factors will cause the quantitatively determined loss contingency estimate to differ
from historical results or other assumptions. The Company has identified six environmental factors
for inclusion in its allowance methodology at this time, aggregating $1.9 million at June 30, 2011
and December 31, 2010, including (i) portfolio trends, (ii) portfolio concentrations, (iii)
economic and market trends, (iv) changes in lending practices, (v) regulatory environment, and (vi)
other factors. The first three factors are believed by management to present the most significant
risk to the portfolio, and are therefore associated with both higher absolute and range of
potential reserve percentages. The reserve percentages for each of the six factors are derived
from available industry information combined with management judgment. The Company may consider
both trends and absolute levels of such factors, if applicable.
The Company evaluates and estimates off-balance sheet credit exposure at the same time it
estimates credit losses for loans by a similar process. These estimated credit losses are not
recorded as part of the allowance for loan losses, but are recorded to a separate liability account
by a charge to income, if material. Loan commitments, unused lines of credit and standby letters
of credit make up the off-balance sheet items reviewed for potential credit losses. These
estimated credit losses were not material at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010.
Credit Quality Indicators The Company uses several credit quality indicators to manage
credit risk in an ongoing manner. The Companys primary credit quality indicator is an internal
credit risk rating system that categorizes loans into pass, special mention, or classified
categories. Credit risk ratings are applied individually to those classes of loans that have
significant or unique credit characteristics that benefit from a case-by-case evaluation. These are
typically loans to businesses or individuals in the classes that comprise the commercial portfolio
segment. Groups of loans that are underwritten and structured using standardized criteria and
characteristics, such as statistical models (e.g., credit scoring or payment performance), are
typically risk rated and monitored collectively. These are typically loans to individuals in the
classes that comprise the consumer portfolio segment.
The following are the definitions of the Companys credit quality indicators:
Pass:
|
Loans in classes that comprise the commercial and consumer portfolio segments that are not adversely rated, are contractually current as to principal and interest, and are otherwise in compliance with the contractual terms of the loan agreement. Management believes there is a low likelihood of loss related to those loans that are considered pass. | |
Special Mention:
|
Loans in classes that comprise the commercial and consumer portfolio segments that have potential weaknesses that deserve managements close attention. If not addressed, these potential weaknesses may result in deterioration of the repayment prospects for the loan. Management believes there is a moderate likelihood of some loss related to those loans that are considered special mention. | |
Classified:
|
Loans in the classes that comprise the commercial portfolio segment that are inadequately protected by the sound worth and paying capacity of the borrower or of the collateral pledged, if any. Classified loans are also those in the classes that comprise the consumer portfolio segment that are past due 90 days or more as to principal or interest. Residential mortgage and home equity loans may be current as to principal and interest, but may be considered classified for a period of up to six months. Following a period of demonstrated performance in accordance with contractual terms, the loan may be removed from classified status. Management believes that there is a distinct possibility that the Company will sustain some loss if the deficiencies related to classified loans are not corrected in a timely manner. |
15
Table of Contents
PARK STERLING CORPORATION
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
The Companys credit quality indicators are periodically updated on a case-by-case basis.
The following tables present the recorded investment in the Companys loans as of June 30, 2011 and
December 31, 2010, by loan class and by credit quality indicator.
As of June 30, 2011 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Commercial | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Commercial | Real Estate | CRE-Investor | Acquisition, | |||||||||||||||||||||
and | (CRE)-Owner | Income | Construction | Other | Total | |||||||||||||||||||
Industrial | Occupied | Producing | and Development | Commercial | Commercial | |||||||||||||||||||
Pass |
$ | 41,356 | $ | 56,294 | $ | 98,506 | $ | 27,065 | $ | 6,840 | $ | 230,061 | ||||||||||||
Special mention |
2,760 | 1,103 | 3,964 | 13,317 | | 21,144 | ||||||||||||||||||
Classified |
940 | 4,481 | 8,879 | 24,280 | | 38,580 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 45,056 | $ | 61,878 | $ | 111,349 | $ | 64,662 | $ | 6,840 | $ | 289,785 | ||||||||||||
Residential | Home Equity | Residential | Other Loans to | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||
Mortgage | Lines of Credit | Construction | Individuals | Consumer | ||||||||||||||||||||
Pass |
$ | 19,613 | $ | 53,930 | $ | 5,954 | $ | 6,384 | $ | 85,881 | ||||||||||||||
Special mention |
945 | 838 | | | 1,783 | |||||||||||||||||||
Classified |
1,209 | 1,713 | 94 | 110 | 3,126 | |||||||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 21,767 | $ | 56,481 | $ | 6,048 | $ | 6,494 | $ | 90,790 | ||||||||||||||
Total Recorded
Investment in Loans |
$ | 380,575 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
As of December 31, 2010 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Commercial | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Commercial | Real Estate | CRE-Investor | Acquisition, | |||||||||||||||||||||
and | (CRE)-Owner | Income | Construction | Other | Total | |||||||||||||||||||
Industrial | Occupied | Producing | and Development | Commercial | Commercial | |||||||||||||||||||
Pass |
$ | 46,888 | $ | 52,746 | $ | 98,195 | $ | 37,435 | $ | 3,225 | $ | 238,489 | ||||||||||||
Special mention |
262 | | 9,520 | 14,289 | | 24,071 | ||||||||||||||||||
Classified |
1,251 | 2,343 | 2,692 | 36,122 | | 42,408 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 48,401 | $ | 55,089 | $ | 110,407 | $ | 87,846 | $ | 3,225 | $ | 304,968 | ||||||||||||
Residential | Home Equity | Residential | Other Loans to | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||
Mortgage | Lines of Credit | Construction | Individuals | Consumer | ||||||||||||||||||||
Pass |
$ | 19,160 | $ | 53,839 | $ | 7,951 | $ | 7,245 | $ | 88,195 | ||||||||||||||
Special mention |
1,359 | 1,607 | | | 2,966 | |||||||||||||||||||
Classified |
1,197 | 1,522 | 1,100 | | 3,819 | |||||||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 21,716 | $ | 56,968 | $ | 9,051 | $ | 7,245 | $ | 94,980 | ||||||||||||||
Total Recorded
Investment in Loans |
$ | 399,948 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
16
Table of Contents
PARK STERLING CORPORATION
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
Aging Analysis of Accruing and Non-Accruing Loans The Company considers a loan to be
past due or delinquent when the terms of the contractual obligation are not met by the borrower.
The following presents by class, an aging analysis of the Companys accruing and non-accruing loans
as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010.
30-59 | 60-89 | Past Due | ||||||||||||||||||
Days | Days | 90 Days | ||||||||||||||||||
Past Due | Past Due | or More | Current | Total Loans | ||||||||||||||||
As of June 30, 2011 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Commercial: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Commercial and industrial |
$ | | $ | | $ | | $ | 45,056 | $ | 45,056 | ||||||||||
Commercial real estate owner-occupied |
| | | 61,878 | 61,878 | |||||||||||||||
Commercial real estate investor income
producing |
633 | | | 110,716 | 111,349 | |||||||||||||||
Acquisition, construction and development |
| 888 | 9,064 | 54,710 | 64,662 | |||||||||||||||
Other commercial |
| | | 6,840 | 6,840 | |||||||||||||||
Total commercial loans |
633 | 888 | 9,064 | 279,200 | 289,785 | |||||||||||||||
Consumer: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Residential mortgage |
| | | 21,767 | 21,767 | |||||||||||||||
Home equity lines of credit |
| | | 56,481 | 56,481 | |||||||||||||||
Residential construction |
| | | 6,048 | 6,048 | |||||||||||||||
Other loans to individuals |
| | | 6,494 | 6,494 | |||||||||||||||
Total consumer loans |
| | | 90,790 | 90,790 | |||||||||||||||
Total loans |
$ | 633 | $ | 888 | $ | 9,064 | $ | 369,990 | $ | 380,575 | ||||||||||
As of December 31, 2010 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Commercial: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Commercial and industrial |
$ | | $ | 593 | $ | 111 | $ | 47,697 | $ | 48,401 | ||||||||||
Commercial real estate owner-occupied |
717 | | | 54,372 | 55,089 | |||||||||||||||
Commercial
real estate investor income producing |
| | 261 | 110,146 | 110,407 | |||||||||||||||
Acquisition, construction and development |
4,025 | 4,188 | 5,676 | 73,957 | 87,846 | |||||||||||||||
Other commercial |
| | | 3,225 | 3,225 | |||||||||||||||
Total commercial loans |
4,742 | 4,781 | 6,048 | 289,397 | 304,968 | |||||||||||||||
Consumer: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Residential mortgage |
| | 374 | 21,342 | 21,716 | |||||||||||||||
Home equity lines of credit |
1,000 | | | 55,968 | 56,968 | |||||||||||||||
Residential construction |
| 1,000 | | 8,051 | 9,051 | |||||||||||||||
Other loans to individuals |
| | | 7,245 | 7,245 | |||||||||||||||
Total consumer loans |
1,000 | 1,000 | 374 | 92,606 | 94,980 | |||||||||||||||
Total loans |
$ | 5,742 | $ | 5,781 | $ | 6,422 | $ | 382,003 | $ | 399,948 | ||||||||||
Impaired Loans All classes of loans are considered impaired when, based on current
information and events, it is probable the Company will be unable to collect all amounts due in
accordance with the original contractual terms of the loan agreement, including scheduled principal
and interest payments. Impaired loans may include all classes of nonaccruing loans and loans
modified in a troubled debt restructuring (TDR). If a loan is impaired, a specific valuation
allowance is allocated, if necessary, so that the loan is reported net, at the present value of
estimated future cash flows using the loans existing rate or at the fair value of collateral if
repayment is expected solely from the collateral. Interest payments on impaired loans are typically
applied to principal unless collectability of the principal amount is reasonably assured, in which
case interest is recognized on a cash basis. Impaired loans, or portions thereof, are charged off
when deemed uncollectible.
17
Table of Contents
PARK STERLING CORPORATION
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
Information for impaired loans, none of which are accruing interest, at and for the
periods ended June 30, 2011 is set forth in the following table:
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
June 30, | June 30, | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Unpaid | Related | Average | Interest | Average | Interest | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Recorded | Principal | Allowance For | Recorded | Income | Recorded | Income | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Investment | Balance | Loan Losses | Investment | Recognized | Investment | Recognized | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Impaired Loans with No Related
Allowance Recorded: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Commercial: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Commercial and industrial |
$ | 11 | $ | 860 | $ | | $ | 315 | $ | | $ | 715 | $ | | ||||||||||||||
CRE owner-occupied |
| | | 153 | | 428 | | |||||||||||||||||||||
CRE investor income producing |
317 | 514 | | 755 | | 902 | | |||||||||||||||||||||
Acquisition, construction and
development |
17,160 | 24,532 | | 23,988 | | 22,678 | | |||||||||||||||||||||
Other commercial |
| | | | | | | |||||||||||||||||||||
Total commercial loans |
17,488 | 25,906 | | 25,211 | | 24,723 | | |||||||||||||||||||||
Consumer: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Residential mortgage |
| | | 1,059 | | 972 | | |||||||||||||||||||||
Home equity lines of credit |
| 1,700 | | 12 | | 289 | | |||||||||||||||||||||
Residential construction |
95 | 380 | | 902 | | 980 | | |||||||||||||||||||||
Other loans to individuals |
| 10 | | | | | | |||||||||||||||||||||
Total consumer loans |
95 | 2,090 | | 1,973 | | 2,241 | | |||||||||||||||||||||
Total impaired loans with
no related
allowance recorded |
$ | 17,583 | $ | 27,996 | $ | | $ | 27,184 | $ | | $ | 26,964 | $ | | ||||||||||||||
Impaired Loans with an
Allowance Recorded: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Commercial: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Commercial and industrial |
$ | 443 | $ | 443 | $ | 222 | $ | | $ | | $ | | $ | | ||||||||||||||
CRE owner-occupied |
| | | | | | | |||||||||||||||||||||
CRE investor income producing |
455 | 468 | 112 | 465 | | 472 | | |||||||||||||||||||||
Acquisition, construction and
development |
6,179 | 6,273 | 1,537 | 6,235 | | 4,124 | | |||||||||||||||||||||
Other commercial |
| | | | | | | |||||||||||||||||||||
Total commercial loans |
7,077 | 7,184 | 1,871 | 6,700 | | 4,596 | | |||||||||||||||||||||
Consumer: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Residential mortgage |
405 | 407 | 10 | 138 | | 70 | | |||||||||||||||||||||
Home equity lines of credit |
500 | 500 | 70 | | | | | |||||||||||||||||||||
Residential construction |
| | | | | | | |||||||||||||||||||||
Other loans to individuals |
| | | | | | | |||||||||||||||||||||
Total consumer loans |
905 | 907 | 80 | 138 | | 70 | | |||||||||||||||||||||
Total impaired loans with an
allowance recorded |
$ | 7,982 | $ | 8,091 | $ | 1,951 | $ | 6,838 | $ | | $ | 4,666 | $ | | ||||||||||||||
Impaired Loans: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Commercial |
$ | 24,565 | $ | 33,090 | $ | 1,871 | $ | 31,911 | $ | | $ | 29,319 | $ | | ||||||||||||||
Consumer |
1,000 | 2,997 | 80 | 2,111 | | 2,311 | | |||||||||||||||||||||
Total impaired loans |
$ | 25,565 | $ | 36,087 | $ | 1,951 | $ | 34,022 | $ | | $ | 31,630 | $ | | ||||||||||||||
18
Table of Contents
PARK STERLING CORPORATION
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
Information for impaired loans, none of which are accruing interest, at and for the year
ended December 31, 2010 is set forth in the following table:
Unpaid | Related | Average | Interest | |||||||||||||||||
Recorded | Principal | Allowance For | Recorded | Income | ||||||||||||||||
Investment | Balance | Loan Losses | Investment | Recognized | ||||||||||||||||
Impaired Loans with No Related
Allowance Recorded: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Commercial: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Commercial and industrial |
$ | 722 | $ | 913 | $ | | $ | 69 | $ | | ||||||||||
CRE owner-occupied |
| | | | | |||||||||||||||
CRE investor income producing |
583 | 841 | | 15 | | |||||||||||||||
Acquisition, construction and
development |
19,054 | 25,909 | | 3,753 | | |||||||||||||||
Other commercial |
| | | | | |||||||||||||||
Total commercial loans |
20,359 | 27,663 | | 3,837 | | |||||||||||||||
Consumer: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Residential mortgage |
1,197 | 1,255 | | 111 | | |||||||||||||||
Home equity lines of credit |
164 | 165 | | 3 | | |||||||||||||||
Residential construction |
1,100 | 2,174 | | 27 | | |||||||||||||||
Other loans to individuals |
| | | | ||||||||||||||||
Total consumer loans |
2,461 | 3,594 | | 141 | | |||||||||||||||
Total impaired loans with
no related
allowance recorded |
$ | 22,820 | $ | 31,257 | $ | | $ | 3,978 | $ | | ||||||||||
Impaired Loans with an
Allowance Recorded: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Commercial: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Commercial and industrial |
$ | 437 | $ | 437 | $ | 280 | $ | 2 | $ | | ||||||||||
CRE owner-occupied |
717 | 741 | 136 | 393 | | |||||||||||||||
CRE investor income producing |
1,119 | 1,209 | 277 | 404 | | |||||||||||||||
Acquisition, construction and
development |
14,818 | 14,828 | 3,399 | 328 | | |||||||||||||||
Other commercial |
| | | | ||||||||||||||||
Total commercial loans |
17,091 | 17,215 | 4,092 | 1,127 | | |||||||||||||||
Consumer: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Residential mortgage |
| | | | | |||||||||||||||
Home equity lines of credit |
1,000 | 1,000 | 115 | 22 | | |||||||||||||||
Residential construction |
| | | | | |||||||||||||||
Other loans to individuals |
| | | | | |||||||||||||||
Total consumer loans |
1,000 | 1,000 | 115 | 22 | | |||||||||||||||
Total impaired loans with an
allowance recorded |
$ | 18,091 | $ | 18,215 | $ | 4,207 | $ | 1,149 | $ | | ||||||||||
Impaired Loans: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Commercial |
$ | 37,450 | $ | 44,878 | $ | 4,092 | $ | 4,964 | $ | | ||||||||||
Consumer |
3,461 | 4,594 | 115 | 163 | | |||||||||||||||
Total impaired loans |
$ | 40,911 | $ | 49,472 | $ | 4,207 | $ | 5,127 | $ | | ||||||||||
During the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, the Company did not
recognize any interest income, including interest income recognized on a cash basis, within the
period that loans were impaired.
19
Table of Contents
PARK STERLING CORPORATION
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
Nonaccrual and Past Due Loans It is the general policy of the Company to stop accruing
interest income when a loan is placed on nonaccrual status and any interest previously accrued but
not collected is reversed against current income. Generally, a loan is placed on nonaccrual status
when it is over 90 days past due and there is reasonable doubt that all principal will be
collected. The recorded investment in nonaccrual loans at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010
follows:
June 30, | December 31, | |||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
Commercial: |
||||||||
Commercial and industrial |
$ | 454 | $ | 1,159 | ||||
CRE owner-occupied |
| 717 | ||||||
CRE investor income producing |
772 | 1,702 | ||||||
Acquisition, construction and development |
23,339 | 33,872 | ||||||
Other commercial |
| | ||||||
Total commercial loans |
24,565 | 37,450 | ||||||
Consumer: |
||||||||
Residential mortgage |
405 | 1,197 | ||||||
Home equity lines of credit |
500 | 1,164 | ||||||
Residential construction |
95 | 1,100 | ||||||
Other loans to individuals |
| | ||||||
Total consumer loans |
1,000 | 3,461 | ||||||
Total nonaccrual loans |
$ | 25,565 | $ | 40,911 | ||||
Nonaccrual loans at June 30, 2011 include $12.9 million of TDR loans of which $12.0
million is in the acquisition, construction and development portfolio. There was no recorded
allowance for these loans as of June 30, 2011. Nonaccrual loans at December 31, 2010 include $24.9
million of TDR loans of which $23.7 million is in the acquisition, construction and development
portfolio. The December 31, 2010 recorded allowance for these loans was $2.4 million.
At June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, there were no loans 90 days or more past due and
accruing interest.
Related Party Loans From time to time, the Company engages in loan transactions with its
directors, executive officers and their related interests (collectively referred to as related
parties). Such loans are made in the ordinary course of business and on substantially the same
terms and collateral as those for comparable transactions prevailing at the time and do not involve
more than the normal risk of collectability or present other unfavorable features. A summary of
activity in loans to related parties is as follows:
Six Months Ended | ||||
June 30, | ||||
2011 | ||||
Beginning balance |
$ | 5,075 | ||
Disbursements |
524 | |||
Repayments |
(1,088 | ) | ||
Ending balance |
$ | 4,511 | ||
At June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the Company had pre-approved but unused lines of
credit totaling $3.5 million to related parties.
20
Table of Contents
PARK STERLING CORPORATION
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
Note 6 Income Taxes
Income taxes are provided based on the asset-liability method of accounting, which includes
the recognition of deferred tax assets and liabilities for the temporary differences between
carrying amounts and tax bases of assets and liabilities, computed using enacted tax rates. In
general, the Company records deferred tax assets when the event giving rise to the tax benefit has
been recognized in the consolidated financial statements.
A valuation allowance is recognized to reduce any deferred tax assets for which, based upon
available information, it is more likely than not that all or any portion will not be realized.
Assessing the need for, and amount of, a valuation allowance for deferred tax assets requires
significant judgment and evaluation. In most cases, the realization of deferred tax assets is
dependent upon the Company generating a sufficient level of taxable income in future periods, which
can be difficult to predict. Management has prepared a forecast which includes judgmental and
quantitative elements that may be subject to significant change. If the Companys forecast of
taxable income within the carryforward periods available under applicable law is not sufficient to
cover the amount of net deferred assets, such assets may be impaired. Based on its forecast and
other judgmental elements, management determined no valuation allowances were needed at either June
30, 2011 or December 31, 2010.
In evaluating whether the Company will realize the full benefit of its net deferred tax asset,
it considered projected earnings, asset quality, liquidity, capital position, which will enable it
to deploy capital to generate taxable income, growth plans, etc. In addition, the Company also
considered the previous twelve quarters of income (loss) before income taxes in determining the
need for a valuation allowance, which is called the cumulative loss test. In the second quarter and
for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and for the year ended 2010, the Company incurred a loss, primarily
as a result of the increased provision for loan losses, which resulted in the failure of the
cumulative loss test. Significant negative trends in credit quality, losses from operations, etc.
could affect the realizability of the deferred tax asset in the future. After considering the above
factors, both positive and negative, management believes that the Companys deferred assets are
more likely than not to be realized.
Note 7 Per Share Results
Basic and diluted net earnings (loss) per common share are computed based on the
weighted-average number of shares outstanding during each period. Diluted net earnings (loss) per
common share reflect the potential dilution that could occur if all dilutive stock options were
exercised and all restricted shares were vested.
Basic and diluted net earnings (loss) per common share have been computed based upon net
income (loss) as presented in the accompanying consolidated statements of income (loss) divided by
the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding or assumed to be outstanding as summarized
below:
Weighted-Average Shares for Earnings Per Share Calculation
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
June 30 | June 30 | |||||||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | |||||||||||||
Weighted-average number of common
shares outstanding |
28,051,098 | 4,951,098 | 28,051,098 | 4,951,098 | ||||||||||||
Effect of dilutive stock options and
restricted shares |
| | | | ||||||||||||
Weighted-average number of common
shares and dilutive
potential common
shares outstanding |
28,051,098 | 4,951,098 | 28,051,098 | 4,951,098 | ||||||||||||
21
Table of Contents
PARK STERLING CORPORATION
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
There were 2,190,064 outstanding stock options that were anti-dilutive for each of the
three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2011. For the three- and six-month periods ended June
30, 2010, 781,652 outstanding stock options were anti-dilutive. In all periods, the anti-dilution
was due to the exercise price exceeding the average market price for the periods and all such
options were omitted from the calculation of diluted earnings per share for their respective
periods.
There were 568,260 outstanding restricted shares that were anti-dilutive for each of the
three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2011, due to the vesting price exceeding the average
market price for the period, and were omitted from the calculation. The restricted shares will
vest one-third each when the Companys share price achieves, for 30 consecutive trading days,
$8.125, $9.10 and $10.40, respectively.
Note 8 Total Comprehensive Income (Loss)
The components of comprehensive income (loss) and related tax effects during the periods ended
June 30, 2011 and 2010 are as follows:
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
June 30, | June 30, | |||||||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | |||||||||||||
Net income (loss) |
(3,114 | ) | 173 | (6,001 | ) | 330 | ||||||||||
Unrealized holding gains on
available-for-sale securities |
$ | 2,476 | $ | 294 | $ | 2,943 | $ | 782 | ||||||||
Tax effect |
(954 | ) | (113 | ) | (1,134 | ) | (301 | ) | ||||||||
Reclassification of gain
recognized
in net income |
(1 | ) | (1 | ) | (20 | ) | (19 | ) | ||||||||
Tax effect |
| | 8 | 7 | ||||||||||||
1,521 | 180 | 1,797 | 469 | |||||||||||||
Unrealized holding loss on swaps |
(188 | ) | (134 | ) | (458 | ) | (289 | ) | ||||||||
Tax effect |
72 | (36 | ) | 176 | (105 | ) | ||||||||||
(116 | ) | (170 | ) | (282 | ) | (394 | ) | |||||||||
Total comprehensive income
(loss) |
$ | (1,709 | ) | $ | 183 | $ | (4,486 | ) | $ | 405 | ||||||
Note 9 Derivative Financial Instruments and Hedging Activities
During May 2008, the Company entered into an interest rate swap agreement with a notional
amount of $40.0 million that matured on May 16, 2011. The derivative instrument was used to protect
certain designated variable rate loans from the downward effects of their repricing in the event of
a decreasing rate environment. It had been accounted for as a cash flow
hedge and the Company recognized no additional gain as a result of this maturity. The fair market
value of this swap at December 31, 2010 was $0.5 million. Changes in fair value of the swap that
are deemed effective are recorded in other comprehensive income net of tax. Changes in fair value
for the ineffective portion of the swap are recorded in interest income; such amounts were
insignificant for each of the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010. The Company
recorded interest income on the swap of $0.1 million and $0.4 million in each of the three and six
months ended June 30, 2011, and $0.3 million and $0.6 million in each of the three and six months
ended June 30, 2010.
22
Table of Contents
PARK STERLING CORPORATION
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
At June 30, 2011, the Company had seven loan swaps, including one forward-starting swap. The
fair value mark on that swap will be offset when the associated loan closes and is marked to
fair value in the fourth quarter of 2011. The total original notional amount of these loan swaps
was $17.4 million. These derivative instruments are used to protect the Company from interest rate
risk caused by changes in the LIBOR curve in relation to certain designated fixed rate loans and
are accounted for as fair value hedges. The derivative instruments are used to convert these fixed
rate loans to an effective floating rate. If the LIBOR rate is below the stated fixed rate of the
loan for a given period, the Company will owe the floating rate payer the notional amount times the
difference between LIBOR and the stated fixed rate. If LIBOR is above the stated rate for any given
period during the term of the contract, the Company will receive payments based on the notional
amount times the difference between LIBOR and the stated fixed rate. These derivative instruments
are carried at a fair market value of $(0.6) and $(0.5) million and are included in loans at June
30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively. The loans being hedged are also recorded at fair
value. The Company recorded interest expense on these loan swaps of $0.2 million and $0.3 million
in each of the three and six months ended June 30, 2011, and $0.1 million and $0.2 million in each
of the three and six months ended June 30, 2010.
See table below for information on the individual loan swaps at June 30, 2011:
Individual Loan Swap Information
Original | Current | Rate | ||||||||||||||||
Notional | Notional | Termination | Fixed | Floating | Payer | |||||||||||||
Amount | Amount | Date | Rate | Rate | Spread | |||||||||||||
$ | 2,670 | $ | 2,427 | 04/10/13 | 5.85 | % | USD-LIBOR-BBA | 2.38 | % | |||||||||
1,800 | 434 | 04/09/13 | 5.80 | % | USD-LIBOR-BBA | 2.33 | % | |||||||||||
1,100 | 1,001 | 03/10/13 | 6.04 | % | USD-LIBOR-BBA | 2.27 | % | |||||||||||
3,775 | 3,532 | 02/15/13 | 5.90 | % | USD-LIBOR-BBA | 2.20 | % | |||||||||||
1,870 | 1,585 | 02/15/13 | 5.85 | % | USD-LIBOR-BBA | 2.25 | % | |||||||||||
2,555 | 2,555 | 10/10/15 | 5.50 | % | USD-LIBOR-BBA | 2.88 | % | |||||||||||
3,595 | 3,574 | 04/27/17 | 5.25 | % | USD-LIBOR-BBA | 2.73 | % | |||||||||||
$ | 17,365 | $ | 15,108 | |||||||||||||||
Note 10 Fair Value Measurements
The Company is required to disclose the estimated fair value of financial instruments, both
assets and liabilities on and off the balance sheet, for which it is practicable to estimate fair
value. These fair value estimates are made at each balance sheet date, based on relevant market
information and information about the financial instruments. Fair value estimates are intended to
represent the price at which an asset could be sold or the price for which a liability could be
settled in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. However,
given there is no active market or observable market transactions for many of the Companys
financial instruments, the Company has made estimates of many of these fair values which are
subjective in nature, involve uncertainties and matters of significant judgment and therefore
cannot be determined with precision. Changes in assumptions could significantly affect the
estimated values. The methodologies used for estimating the fair value of financial assets and
financial liabilities are discussed below:
Cash and Cash Equivalents
The carrying amounts of cash and short-term instruments including due from banks and federal
funds sold approximate their fair value.
Investment Securities
Fair value for investment securities is based on the quoted market price if such information
is available. If a quoted market price is not available, fair values are based on quoted
market prices of comparable instruments.
23
Table of Contents
PARK STERLING CORPORATION
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
Loan Held for Sale
The fair value of loans held for sale is determined, when possible, using quoted secondary
market prices. If no such quoted prices exist, the fair value of the loan is determined
using quoted prices for a similar loan or loans, adjusted for the specific attributes of the
loan.
FHLB Stock
The Bank, as a member of the FHLB, is required to maintain an investment in FHLB capital
stock and the carrying amount is estimated to be fair value.
Loans, net of allowance
For certain homogenous categories of loans, such as residential mortgages, fair value is
estimated using the quoted market prices for securities backed by similar loans, adjusted
for differences in loan characteristics. The fair value of other types of loans is estimated
by discounting the future cash flows using the current rates at which similar loans would be
made to borrowers with similar credit ratings and for the same remaining maturities. Further
adjustments are made to reflect current market conditions. There is no discount for
liquidity included in the expected cash flow assumptions.
Accrued Interest Receivable
The carrying amount is a reasonable estimate of fair value.
Deposits
The fair value of deposits that have no stated maturities, including demand deposits,
savings, money market and NOW accounts, is the amount payable on demand at the reporting
date. The fair value of deposits that have stated maturity dates, primarily time deposits,
is estimated by discounting expected cash flows using the rates currently offered for
instruments of similar remaining maturities.
Borrowings
The fair values of short-term and long-term borrowings are based on discounting expected
cash flows at the interest rate for debt with the same or similar remaining maturities and
collateral requirements.
Accrued Interest Payable
The carrying amount is a reasonable estimate of fair value.
Derivative Instruments
Derivative instruments, including interest rate swaps and swap fair value hedges, are
recorded at fair value on a recurring basis. Fair value measurement is based on discounted
cash flow models. All future floating cash flows are projected and both floating and fixed
cash flows are discounted to the valuation date.
Financial Instruments with Off-Balance Sheet Risk
With regard to financial instruments with off-balance sheet risk discussed in Note K of the
2010 Audited Financial Statements, it is not practicable to estimate the fair value of
future financing commitments.
24
Table of Contents
PARK STERLING CORPORATION
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
The carrying amounts and estimated fair values of the Companys financial instruments, none of
which are held for trading purposes, at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 are as follows:
Financial Instruments Carrying Amounts and Estimated Fair Values
June 30, 2011 | December 31, 2010 | |||||||||||||||
Carrying | Estimated | Carrying | Estimated | |||||||||||||
Amount | Fair Value | Amount | Fair Value | |||||||||||||
Financial assets: |
||||||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 66,980 | $ | 66,980 | $ | 65,378 | $ | 65,378 | ||||||||
Investment securities |
146,734 | 146,734 | 140,590 | 140,590 | ||||||||||||
Loans held for sale |
1,600 | 1,600 | | | ||||||||||||
Loans, net of allowance |
369,088 | 364,747 | 387,405 | 382,854 | ||||||||||||
FHLB stock |
1,882 | 1,882 | 1,757 | 1,757 | ||||||||||||
Interest rate swap |
| | 459 | 459 | ||||||||||||
Accrued interest receivable |
1,462 | 1,462 | 1,640 | 1,640 | ||||||||||||
Financial liabilities: |
||||||||||||||||
Deposits with no stated
maturity |
$ | 153,030 | $ | 153,030 | $ | 107,999 | $ | 107,999 | ||||||||
Deposits with stated maturities |
250,876 | 251,671 | 299,821 | 300,393 | ||||||||||||
Swap fair value hedge |
601 | 601 | 569 | 569 | ||||||||||||
Borrowings |
28,556 | 27,778 | 27,769 | 26,913 | ||||||||||||
Accrued interest payable |
201 | 201 | 290 | 290 |
The Company utilizes fair value measurements to record fair value adjustments to certain
assets and liabilities and to determine fair value disclosures. Securities available-for-sale are
recorded at fair value on a recurring basis. Additionally, from time to time, the Company may be
required to record other assets at fair value on a nonrecurring basis. These nonrecurring fair
value adjustments typically involve application of lower of cost or market accounting or
write-downs of individual assets.
The Company groups assets and liabilities at fair value in three levels, based on the markets
in which the assets and liabilities are traded and the reliability of the assumptions used to
determine fair value.
Level 1
|
Valuation is based upon quoted prices for identical instruments traded in active markets. | |
Level 2
|
Valuation is based upon quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active and model-based valuation techniques for which all significant assumptions are observable in the market. | |
Level 3
|
Valuation is generated from model-based techniques that use at least one significant assumption not observable in the market. These unobservable assumptions reflect estimates of assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability. Valuation techniques may include the use of option pricing models, discounted cash flow models and similar techniques. |
Following is a description of valuation methodologies used for assets and liabilities recorded
at fair value:
Investment Securities Available-for-Sale
Investment securities available-for-sale are recorded at fair value on a recurring basis.
Fair value measurement is based upon quoted prices, if available. If quoted prices are not
available, fair values are measured using independent pricing models or other model-based
valuation techniques such as present value of future cash flows, adjusted for the
securitys credit rating, prepayment assumptions and other factors such as credit loss
assumptions. Level 1 securities include those traded on an active exchange, such as the
New York Stock Exchange, U.S. Treasury securities that are traded by dealers or brokers in
active over-the-counter
25
Table of Contents
PARK STERLING CORPORATION
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
markets and money market funds. Level 2 securities include
mortgage-backed securities issued by government-sponsored entities, municipal bonds and corporate debt
securities that are valued using quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets.
Securities classified as Level 3 include a corporate debt security in a less liquid market
whose value is determined by reference to the going rate of a similar debt security if it
were to enter the market at period end. The derived market value requires significant
management judgment and is further substantiated by discounted cash flow methodologies.
Derivative Instruments
Derivative instruments held or issued by the Company for risk management purposes are
traded in over-the-counter markets where quoted market prices are not readily available.
For those derivatives, the Company uses a third party to measure the fair value. The
Company classifies derivatives instruments held or issued for risk management purposes as
Level 2. As of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the Companys derivative instruments
consist of interest rate swaps and swap fair value hedges.
Loans
Loans for which it is probable that payment of interest and principal will not be made in
accordance with the contractual terms of the loan agreement are considered impaired. Once
a loan is identified as individually impaired, management measures it for the estimated
impairment. The fair value of impaired loans is estimated using one of several methods,
including collateral value, a loans observable market price and discounted cash flows.
Those impaired loans not requiring a specific allowance represent loans for which the fair
value exceeds the recorded investments in such loans. Impaired loans where a specific
allowance is established based on the fair value of collateral require classification in
the fair value hierarchy. When the fair value of the collateral is based on an observable
market price or a current appraised value, the Company records the impaired loan as
nonrecurring Level 2. When an appraised value is not available or management determines
the fair value of the collateral is further impaired below the appraised value and there
is no observable market price for the collateral, the Company records the impaired loan as
nonrecurring Level 3.
At June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, substantially all of the total impaired loans were
evaluated based on the fair value of the collateral. The Company recorded the six loans
involved in fair value hedges at fair market value on a recurring basis. The Company does
not record other loans at fair value on a recurring basis.
Other real estate owned
Other real estate owned (OREO) is adjusted to fair value upon transfer of the loans to
OREO. Subsequently, OREO is carried at the lower of carrying value or fair value. Fair
value is based upon independent market prices, appraised values of the collateral or
managements estimation of the value of the collateral. When the fair value of the
collateral is based on an observable market price or a current appraised value, the
Company records the foreclosed asset as nonrecurring Level 2. When an appraised value is
not available or management determines the fair value of the collateral is further
impaired below the appraised value and there is not an observable market price for the
collateral, the Company records the OREO as nonrecurring Level 3.
26
Table of Contents
PARK STERLING CORPORATION
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
Assets and Liabilities Recorded at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis
The table below presents, by level, the recorded amount of assets and liabilities at June 30,
2011 and December 31, 2010 measured at fair value on a recurring basis:
Fair Value on a Recurring Basis
Quoted Prices in | Significant | |||||||||||||||
Active Markets for | Other | Significant | ||||||||||||||
Identical Assets | Observable Inputs | Unobservable Inputs | Assets/Liabilities | |||||||||||||
Description | (Level 1) | (Level 2) | (Level 3) | at Fair Value | ||||||||||||
June 30, 2011 |
||||||||||||||||
U.S. Government agencies |
$ | | $ | 15,574 | $ | | $ | 15,574 | ||||||||
Residential mortgage-backed securities |
| 60,479 | | 60,479 | ||||||||||||
Collateralized agency mortgage
obligations |
| 54,239 | | 54,239 | ||||||||||||
Municipal securities |
| 16,042 | | 16,042 | ||||||||||||
Debt Securities |
| | 400 | 400 | ||||||||||||
Loans held for sale |
| 1,600 | | 1,600 | ||||||||||||
Fair value loans |
| 15,709 | | 15,709 | ||||||||||||
Swap fair value hedge |
| (601 | ) | | (601 | ) | ||||||||||
December 31, 2010 |
||||||||||||||||
U.S. Government agencies |
$ | | $ | 13,160 | $ | | $ | 13,160 | ||||||||
Residential mortgage-backed securities |
| 52,399 | | 52,399 | ||||||||||||
Collateralized agency mortgage
obligations |
| 58,719 | | 58,719 | ||||||||||||
Municipal securities |
| 13,808 | | 13,808 | ||||||||||||
Debt Securities |
| | 350 | 350 | ||||||||||||
Corporate and other Securities |
| 2,154 | | 2,154 | ||||||||||||
Interest rate swap |
| 459 | | 459 | ||||||||||||
Fair value loans |
| 9,702 | | 9,702 | ||||||||||||
Swap fair value hedge |
| (569 | ) | (569 | ) |
There were no transfers between valuation levels during the three or six months
ended June 30, 2011 or June 30, 2010.
The following are reconciliations of the beginning and ending balances for assets measured at
fair value on a recurring basis using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) during the six
months ended June 30, 2011 and June 30, 2010.
Level 3 Assets Reconciliation
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
June 30, | June 30, | |||||||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | |||||||||||||
Debt Securities: |
||||||||||||||||
Balance, beginning of
period |
$ | 353 | $ | 400 | $ | 350 | $ | 400 | ||||||||
Decrease in unrealized loss |
47 | 8 | 50 | 8 | ||||||||||||
Balance, end of period |
$ | 400 | $ | 408 | $ | 400 | $ | 408 | ||||||||
27
Table of Contents
PARK STERLING CORPORATION
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
Assets Recorded at Fair Value on a Nonrecurring Basis
Assets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010
are included in the table below by level:
Fair Value on a Nonrecurring Basis
Quoted Prices | ||||||||||||||||
in Active | Significant | |||||||||||||||
Markets for | Other | Significant | ||||||||||||||
Identical | Observable | Unobservable | Assets/ | |||||||||||||
Assets | Inputs | Inputs | (Liabilities) | |||||||||||||
Description | (Level 1) | (Level 2) | (Level 3) | at Fair Value | ||||||||||||
June 30, 2011 |
||||||||||||||||
OREO |
$ | | $ | 3,470 | $ | | $ | 3,470 | ||||||||
Impaired loans: |
||||||||||||||||
Commercial and industrial |
| | 221 | 221 | ||||||||||||
CRE investor income
producing |
| | 343 | 343 | ||||||||||||
Acquisition, construction and
development |
| | 4,642 | 4,642 | ||||||||||||
Residential mortgage |
| | 395 | 395 | ||||||||||||
Home equity lines of credit |
| | 430 | 430 | ||||||||||||
December 31, 2010 |
||||||||||||||||
OREO |
$ | | $ | 1,246 | $ | | $ | 1,246 | ||||||||
Impaired loans: |
||||||||||||||||
Commercial and industrial |
| | 157 | 157 | ||||||||||||
CRE owner-occupied |
| | 581 | 581 | ||||||||||||
CRE investor income
producing |
| | 842 | 842 | ||||||||||||
Acquisition, construction and
development |
| | 11,419 | 11,419 | ||||||||||||
Home equity lines of credit |
| | 885 | 885 |
The carrying value of OREO is periodically reviewed and written down to fair value and
any loss is included in earnings. During the six months ended June 30, 2011, OREO with a carrying
value of $1.0 million was written down by $0.3 million to $0.7 million. There were no write downs
of OREO during the six months ended June 30, 2010.
There were no transfers between valuation levels for any accounts for the three and six months
ended June 30, 2011 and June 30, 2010. If different valuation techniques are deemed necessary, the
Company would consider those transfers to occur at the end of the period that the accounts are
valued.
28
Table of Contents
PARK STERLING CORPORATION
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
Note 11 Commitments and Contingencies
In the normal course of business, there are various outstanding commitments and contingent
liabilities, such as commitments to extend credit, which are not reflected in the accompanying
unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements. At June 30, 2011, the Company had $7.8
million of loan commitments outstanding, $66.4 million of pre-approved but unused lines of credit
and $4.0 million of standby letters of credit and financial guarantees. At December 31, 2010, the
Company had $3.8 million of loan commitments outstanding, $69.6 million of pre-approved but unused
lines of credit and $2.9 million of standby letters of credit and financial guarantees. In
managements opinion, these commitments represent no more than normal lending risk to the Company
and will be funded from normal sources of liquidity.
As of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the Company has a commitment to fund $0.6
million related to an agreement with the Small Business Investment Corporation.
29
Table of Contents
CAUTIONARY STATEMENT REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This report contains, and Park Sterling Corporation (the Company) and its management
may make, certain statements that constitute forward-looking statements within the meaning of the
Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These statements can be identified by the fact
that they do not relate strictly to historical or current facts and often use words such as may,
plan, contemplate, anticipate, believe, intend, continue, expect, project,
predict, estimate, could, should, would, will, goal, target and similar
expressions. The forward-looking statements express managements current expectations, plans or
forecasts of future events, results and condition, including expectations regarding the proposed
merger with Community Capital, the general business strategy of engaging in bank mergers, organic
growth and anticipated asset size, additional branch openings, refinement of the loan loss
allowance methodology, recruiting of key leadership positions, decreases in construction and
development loans and other changes in loan mix, changes in deposit mix, capital and liquidity
levels, net interest income, credit trends and conditions, including loan losses, allowance,
charge-offs, delinquency trends and nonperforming loan and asset levels, and other similar matters.
These statements are not guarantees of future results or performance and by their nature involve
certain risks and uncertainties that are based on managements beliefs and assumptions and on the
information available to management at the time that these disclosures were prepared. Actual
outcomes and results may differ materially from those expressed in, or implied by, any of these
forward-looking statements.
You should not place undue reliance on any forward-looking statement and should consider all
of the following uncertainties and risks, as well as those more fully discussed in the 2010 Form
10-K and the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended March 31, 2011 and in any of the Companys subsequent filings with the SEC: failure of Community
Capitals shareholders to approve the merger; failure to realize synergies and other financial
benefits from the proposed Community Capital merger within the expected time frame; increases in
expected costs or difficulties related to integration of the Community Capital merger; fluctuation
in the trading price of the Companys stock prior to the closing of the proposed Community Capital
merger, which would affect the total value of the proposed merger transaction; inability to
successfully open new branches or loan production offices, including the Companys inability to
attract and maintain customers; inability to identify and successfully negotiate and complete
additional combinations with potential merger partners or to successfully integrate such businesses
into the Company, including the Companys ability to realize the benefits and cost savings from and
limit any unexpected liabilities acquired as a result of any such business combination; the impact
of deterioration of the United States credit standing; the effects of negative
economic conditions, including stress in the commercial real estate markets or delay or failure of
recovery in the residential real estate markets; changes in consumer and investor confidence and
the related impact on financial markets and institutions; changes in interest rates; failure of
assumptions underlying the establishment of its allowance; deterioration in the credit quality of
its loan portfolios or in the value of the collateral securing those loans; deterioration in the
value of securities held in its investment securities portfolio; legal and regulatory developments;
increased competition from both banks and nonbanks; changes in accounting standards, rules and
interpretations, inaccurate estimates or assumptions in accounting and the impact on the Companys
financial statements; the Companys ability to attract new employees; and managements ability to
effectively manage credit risk, market risk, operational risk, legal risk, and regulatory and
compliance risk.
Forward-looking statements speak only as of the date they are made, and the Company undertakes
no obligation to update any forward-looking statement to reflect the impact of circumstances or
events that arise after the date the forward-looking statement was made.
30
Table of Contents
Item 2. | Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
The purpose of this discussion and analysis is to focus on significant changes in the
Companys financial condition as of and results of operations during the three- and six-month
period ended June 30, 2011. This discussion and analysis highlights and supplements information
contained elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, particularly the preceding unaudited
condensed consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes.
Executive Overview
The second quarter of 2011 was marked by significant progress in advancing the Companys
growth strategy. The Company received regulatory approvals from the Federal Reserve Board and the
SC Board for the planned merger with
Community Capital. The merger, which is subject to customary
closing conditions, including Community Capital shareholder approval, currently is expected to close either
late in the third quarter of 2011 or early in the fourth quarter of 2011. Organic growth
initiatives during the second quarter included the addition of veteran, in-market bankers in
Charleston, South Carolina, the Upstate region of South Carolina and the Research Triangle region
of North Carolina. Additionally, the Company added a newly formed Asset-Based Lending (ABL) line
of business to help drive growth and further diversify the loan portfolio across the franchise.
Asset quality continued to improve during the second quarter. Nonperforming loans decreased
$7.7 million, or 22%, to $27.6 million, or 7.25% of total loans, compared to $35.2 million, or
9.07% of total loans, as of March 31, 2011. Nonperforming assets decreased $4.2 million, or 11%,
to $32.6 million, or 5.34% of total assets, down from $36.8 million, or 5.85% of total assets, as
of March 31, 2011. The provision for loan losses decreased $1.2 million, or 27%, to $3.2 million,
compared to the first quarter of 2011. Net charge-offs decreased $1.4 million, or 27%, to $3.7
million, representing 3.93% of average loans on an annualized basis, compared to $5.1 million, or
5.27% of average loans (annualized) in the prior quarter.
Net interest income decreased slightly to $3.8 million compared to $4.0 million in the first
quarter of 2011, and the net interest margin decreased 8 basis points during the same time period
to 2.60%. The decrease in the net interest margin related in part to a 3% decrease in average loan
balances, resulting from the resolution of problem credits and a managed decrease in construction
and development exposure to improve the loan mix. It was also impacted by a $170 thousand decrease
in swap income from a matured portfolio hedge and a negative $88 thousand mark from a
forward-starting swap (the then prevailing mark on which will reverse out when the associated loan
closes in the fourth quarter). These negative factors were partially offset by a 16 basis point
improvement in funding costs as a result of improved deposit mix and pricing.
Noninterest expense increased $1.2 million, or 29% to $5.5 million compared to $4.2 million in
the first quarter of 2011. This increase in noninterest expense included $557,000 in incremental
merger-related expenses and $68,000 in incremental start-up costs associated with becoming
a new public company, both of which related primarily to legal and professional fees. The increase
also included $334,000 in incremental costs associated with the new de novo offices and ABL
capabilities, related primarily to personnel and occupancy costs. Positive items included a
$91,000 decrease in FDIC insurance premiums and a $142,000 decrease in OREO-related expenses.
Total assets decreased $17.7 million, or 3%, compared to the first quarter of 2011, primarily
due to a $7.8 million reduction in loan balances. The decrease in loans resulted primarily from a
2% reduction in income-producing commercial real estate loans and a 15% decrease in construction
and development loans (both commercial and residential). These declines were partially offset by a
6% increase in combined commercial and industrial and owner occupied loans and a 5% increase in
home equity lines of credit. Total exposure to
construction and development loans decreased to 19% of gross loans, down from 21% in the first
quarter of 2011.
31
Table of Contents
Total deposits decreased $17.6 million, or 4%, compared to the first quarter of 2011. This
decrease in deposits was primarily due to a managed 10% decrease in time deposits, as management
both allowed higher-priced special rates to roll-off and reduced brokered deposits. The decrease
was offset by a 3% increase in money market, NOW and savings deposits, and a 14% increase in demand
deposits. Core deposits, which exclude brokered deposits, as a percentage of total deposits were
76%, compared to 78% in the first quarter of 2011.
Shareholders equity decreased $1.2 million to $173.6 million compared to $174.8 million at
March 31, 2011, primarily resulting from the second quarter 2011 net loss of $3.1 million. Tier 1
leverage ratio was 27.07%, a slight decrease from 28.36% at March 31, 2011.
Business Overview
The Company was formed on October 6, 2010 to serve as the holding company for the Bank and is
a bank holding company registered with the Federal Reserve Board under the BHC Act. At present, the
Companys primary operations and business are that of owning the Bank, its sole subsidiary. The
Companys offices are located at 1043 E. Morehead Street, Suite 201, Charlotte, North Carolina,
28204 and its phone number is (704) 716-2134.
The Bank was incorporated on September 8, 2006 as a North Carolina-chartered commercial bank
and is the wholly owned subsidiary of the Company. The Bank opened for business on October 25, 2006
at 1043 E. Morehead Street, Suite 201, Charlotte, North Carolina. The Bank opened a branch in
Wilmington, North Carolina, in October 2007, in the SouthPark neighborhood of Charlotte in July
2008, and in Charleston, South Carolina in June 2011. Also in June 2011, the Company opened loan
production offices in Raleigh, North Carolina and Greenville, South Carolina. In July 2011, the
Company submitted its application to the NC Commissioner seeking regulatory approval to open a
full service branch in Greenville, South Carolina and currently expects, as soon as it is practicable, to
seek regulatory approval to open a full service branch in Raleigh, North Carolina. The Bank
currently anticipates that it will open additional branch offices and/or loan production offices in
its target markets in the future.
On January 1, 2011, the Company acquired all of the outstanding common stock of the Bank in
the Reorganization, which was effected under North Carolina law and in accordance with the terms of
an Agreement and Plan of Reorganization and Share Exchange dated October 22, 2010. This agreement
and the Reorganization were approved by the Banks shareholders at a special meeting of the Banks
shareholders held on November 23, 2010. Pursuant to the Reorganization, shares of the Banks
common stock were exchanged for shares of the Companys common stock on a one-for-one basis. As a
result, the Bank became the sole subsidiary of the Company, the Company became the holding company
for the Bank and the shareholders of the Bank became shareholders of the Company. The unaudited
condensed consolidated financial statements, discussions of those statements, market data and all
other operating data presented herein for periods prior to January 1, 2011 are those of the Bank on
a stand-alone basis.
In August 2010, the Bank conducted the Public Offering, which raised gross proceeds of $150.2
million to facilitate a change in its business plan from primarily organic growth at a moderate
pace over the next few years to seeking to acquire regional and community banks in the Carolinas
and Virginia. The Company intends to become a regional-sized multi-state banking franchise through
acquisitions and organic growth, seeking to reach a consolidated asset size of between $8 billion
and $10 billion over the next several years. The Company expects that typically it would fund any
such acquisitions through a combination of the issuance of stock and cash as payment of the
consideration in such acquisition. Depending on the timing and magnitude of any particular future
acquisition,
the Company anticipates that in the future it likely will seek additional equity capital or
issue indebtedness at some point to fund its growth strategy, although it currently has no plans
with respect to any such issuance.
32
Table of Contents
As part of the Banks change in strategy, immediately following the Public Offering, the Bank
reduced the size of its board of directors from thirteen members to six members, maintaining two of
the sitting directors, Larry W. Carroll and Thomas B. Henson, and adding four new directors, Walter
C. Ayers, Leslie M. (Bud) Baker, James C. Cherry and Jeffrey S. Kane. Mr. Baker was named Chairman
of the board of directors upon becoming a member. In March 2011, the board of directors of the
Company, which mirrors that of the Bank, approved expanding its membership to seven and appointed
Jean E. Davis as a director.
The Bank also reorganized its management team following the Public Offering. The new
executive management team includes James C. Cherry, who became the Chief Executive Officer; David
L. Gaines, who became the Chief Financial Officer; Nancy J. Foster, who became the Chief Risk
Officer; and Bryan F. Kennedy, III, who was the President and Chief Executive Officer and remains
the President.
As part of its operations, the Company regularly evaluates the potential acquisition of, and
holds discussions with, various financial institutions eligible for bank holding company ownership
or control. As a general rule, the Company expects to publicly announce material transactions when
a definitive agreement has been reached.
On March 30, 2011, the Company and Community Capital entered into an Agreement and Plan of
Merger, pursuant to which Community Capital will be merged with and into the Company, with the
Company as the surviving entity. The merger has been unanimously approved by the board of directors
of each company and the Company has received approval of the merger from the Federal Reserve Board
and the SC Board. The merger is subject to customary closing conditions, including Community
Capital shareholder approval. If the merger is completed, each outstanding share of Community
Capital common stock will be exchanged for either 0.6667 of a share of Company common stock or
$3.30 in cash, subject to the limitation that the total consideration will consist of 40.0% in cash
and 60.0% in shares of Company common stock. As of June 30, 2011, Community Capital, which is
headquartered in Greenwood, South Carolina, had $637.1 million in assets and operated 17 full
service branches and one drive-through facility throughout South Carolina.
Market Area
The Company provides banking services to small and mid-sized businesses, owner-occupied and
income producing real estate owners, real estate developers and builders, professionals and
consumers doing business or residing within its target markets. Through its offices, the Bank
provides a wide range of banking products, including personal and business checking accounts,
individual retirement accounts, business and personal money market accounts, certificates of
deposit, overdraft protection, safe deposit boxes and online banking. The Companys lending
activities include a range of short to medium-term commercial, real estate, residential mortgage
and home equity and personal loans. Its objective since inception has been to provide the strength
and product diversity of a larger bank and the service and relationship attention that
characterizes a community bank. The Company strives to develop a personal relationship with its
customers while at the same time offering traditional deposit and loan banking services.
The Companys primary market area consists of the Charlotte and
Wilmington,
North Carolina metropolitan statistical area (MSAs). The Company also operates a branch
office in Charleston, South Carolina and loan production offices in Raleigh, North Carolina and
Greenville, South Carolina. Additional information regarding each of these locations is provided
below.
Charlotte. Charlotte, the largest city in North or South Carolina, anchors an MSA with a total
population of approximately 1.8 million in 2010, according to the Charlotte Chamber of Commerce.
According to the U.S. Census Bureau, the population for the Charlotte-Gastonia-Rock Hill MSA
increased 34.8% from 2000 to
2010. This population is expected to grow 14.8% between 2010 and 2015. Charlotte is a significant
financial center and is currently home to nine Fortune 500 companies. Charlotte also has
concentrations in the transportation, utilities, education, professional services and construction
sectors. The 2010 median household income for the Charlotte MSA was $62,215 and is projected to
grow 13.2% over the next five years.
Wilmington. Wilmington, a historic seaport and the largest city on the coast of North
Carolina, anchors a metropolitan area covering New Hanover, Brunswick and Pender counties with a
2010 population of 367,101. The U.S. Census Bureau estimates that Wilmingtons MSA is expected to
grow 13.2% from 2010 to 2015. Wilmingtons economy is diversified and includes tourism, shipping,
pharmaceutical development, chemical and aircraft component manufacturing, and fiber optic
industries. Wilmington is also a regional retail and medical center, with the New Hanover Regional
Medical Center/Cape Fear Hospital ranking in the top ten largest medical facilities in the state.
The median household income in 2010 for the Wilmington MSA was $49,403 and is projected to increase
13.2% over the next five years.
33
Table of Contents
Charleston. Charleston, the second largest city in South Carolina, is located on the states
coastline. According to the U.S. Census Bureau, the population for the Charleston-North
Charleston-Summerville MSA was 671,833, a 22.3% increase since 2000. The areas population is
projected to grow 10.3% from 2010 to 2015. Charleston is the largest business and financial center
for the southeastern section of South Carolina. The city is a popular tourist destination, with a
large number of restaurants, hotels and retail stores. The manufacturing, shipping and medical
industries are also key economic sectors in Charleston. The 2010 median household income for the
Charleston MSA was $51,065 and is expected to grow 12.6% from 2010 to 2015.
Raleigh. Raleigh, the capital city of North Carolina, is located in the metropolitan area
covering Wake, Johnston, and Franklin counties. The Raleigh-Cary MSA had a total population of
approximately 1.2 million in 2010, and is expected to grow 19.4% over the next five years. Raleigh
is part of North Carolinas Research Triangle, an eight-county region that is home to numerous
high-tech companies and enterprises. Other industries present in the economy include
banking/financial services, electrical and medical equipment, wholesale distribution, and
pharmaceuticals. The median household income in 2010 for the Raleigh-Cary MSA was $68,373 and is
projected to increase 15.4% over the next five years.
Greenville. Greenville, located within the largest county in South Carolina, is on the
Interstate 85 corridor, approximately halfway between Atlanta and Charlotte. According to the U.S.
Census Bureau, the population for the Greenville-Mauldin-Easley MSA was 644,096, a 15.0% increase
since 2000. The areas population is projected to grow 7.4% between 2010 and 2015. Greenvilles
economy, formerly based largely around textiles, is now dominated by the manufacturing, automotive
research, and healthcare industries. The city is the home of Michelins North American
headquarters. The 2010 median household income for the Greenville MSA was $50,114 and is expected
to grow 11.4% by 2015.
Competition
The Company competes for deposits in its banking markets with other commercial banks, savings
banks and other thrift institutions, credit unions, agencies issuing U.S. government securities and
all other organizations and institutions engaged in money market transactions. In its lending
activities, the Company competes with all other financial institutions, as well as consumer finance
companies, mortgage companies and other. Commercial banking in the Charlotte and Wilmington
markets, and in its targeted markets of the Carolinas and Virginia generally, is extremely
competitive.
Interest rates, both on loans and deposits, and prices of fee-based services, are significant
competitive factors among financial institutions generally. Other important competitive factors
include office location, office hours, the quality of customer service, community reputation,
continuity of personnel and services, and in the case of larger commercial customers, relative
lending limits and the ability to offer sophisticated cash management and other commercial banking
services. Many of the Banks competitors have greater resources, broader geographic markets and
higher lending limits than the Bank does, and they can offer more products and services and can
better afford and make more effective use of media advertising, support services and electronic
technology than can the Bank. To counter these competitive disadvantages, the Bank depends on its
reputation as a community bank in its
local markets, its direct customer contact, its ability to make credit and other business
decisions locally, and its personalized customer service.
In recent years, federal and state legislation has heightened the competitive environment in
which all financial institutions conduct their business, and the potential for competition among
financial institutions of all types has increased significantly. Additionally, with the elimination
of restrictions on interstate banking, a North Carolina commercial bank may be required to compete
not only with other North Carolina-based financial institutions, but also with out-of-state
financial institutions which may acquire North Carolina institutions, establish or acquire branch
offices in North Carolina, or otherwise offer financial services across state lines, thereby adding
to the competitive atmosphere of the industry in general. In terms of assets, the Bank is currently
one of the smaller commercial banks in North Carolina.
34
Table of Contents
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
See Note 2 to the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements included in this
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for a description of recent accounting pronouncements including the
respective expected dates of adoption and effects on results of operations and financial condition.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
In the preparation of its financial statements, the Company has adopted various accounting
policies that govern the application of accounting principles generally accepted in the United
States and in accordance with general practices within the banking industry. The Companys
significant accounting policies are described in Note B Summary of Significant Accounting
Policies to the 2010 Audited Financial Statements. While all of these policies are important to
understanding the Companys Financial Statements, certain accounting policies described below
involve significant judgment and assumptions by management of the Company that have a material
impact on the carrying value of certain assets and liabilities. The Company considers these
accounting policies to be critical accounting policies. The judgment and assumptions the Company
uses are based on historical experience and other factors, which the it believes to be reasonable
under the circumstances. Because of the nature of the judgment and assumptions the Company makes,
actual results could differ from these judgments and assumptions that could have a material impact
on the carrying values of its assets and liabilities and its results of operations.
Allowance for Loan Losses. The allowance for loan losses is based upon managements ongoing
evaluation of the loan portfolio and reflects an amount considered by management to be its best
estimate of known and inherent losses in the portfolio as of the balance sheet date. The
determination of the allowance for loan losses involves a high degree of judgment and complexity.
In making the evaluation of the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses, management considers
current economic conditions, statutory examinations of the loan portfolio by regulatory agencies,
independent loan reviews performed periodically by third parties, delinquency information,
managements internal review of the loan portfolio, and other relevant factors. While management
uses the best information available to make evaluations, future adjustments to the allowance may be
necessary if conditions differ substantially from the assumptions used in making the evaluations.
In addition, regulatory examiners may require the Company to recognize changes to the allowance for
loan losses based on their judgments about information available to them at the time of their
examination. Although provisions have been established by loan segment, based upon managements
assessment of their differing inherent loss characteristics, the entire allowance for losses on
loans is available to absorb further loan losses in any segment. Further information regarding the
Companys policies and methodology used to estimate the allowance for possible loan losses is
presented in Note D Loans to the Companys 2010 Audited Financial Statements.
Income Taxes. Income taxes are provided based on the asset-liability method of accounting,
which includes the recognition of deferred tax assets and liabilities for the temporary differences
between carrying amounts and tax bases of assets and liabilities, computed using enacted tax rates.
In general, the Company records deferred tax assets when the event giving rise to the tax benefit
has been recognized in the consolidated financial statements.
A valuation allowance is recognized to reduce any deferred tax assets for which, based upon
available information, it is more likely than not that all or any portion will not be realized.
Assessing the need for, and amount of, a valuation allowance for deferred tax assets requires
significant judgment and evaluation. In most cases, the realization of deferred tax assets is
dependent upon the Company generating a sufficient level of taxable income in future periods, which
can be difficult to predict. Management has prepared a forecast which includes judgmental and
quantitative elements that may be subject to significant change. If the Companys forecast of
taxable income within the carryforward periods available under applicable law is not sufficient to
cover the amount of net deferred assets, such assets may be impaired. Based on its forecast and
other judgmental elements, management determined no valuation allowances were needed at either June
30, 2011 or December 31, 2010.
35
Table of Contents
In evaluating whether the Company will realize the full benefit of its net deferred tax asset,
it considered projected earnings, asset quality, liquidity, capital position, which will enable it
to deploy capital to generate taxable income, growth plans, etc. In addition, the Company also
considered the previous twelve quarters of income (loss) before income taxes in determining the
need for a valuation allowance, which is called the cumulative loss test. In the second quarter and
for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and for the year ended 2010, the Company incurred a loss,
primarily as a result of the increased provision for loan losses, which resulted in the failure of
the cumulative loss test. Significant negative trends in credit quality, losses from operations,
etc. could affect the realizability of the deferred tax asset in the future. After considering the
above factors, both positive and negative, management believes that the Companys deferred assets
are more likely than not to be realized.
Fair Value Measurements. As a financial services company, the carrying value of certain
financial assets and liabilities is impacted by the application of fair value measurements, either
directly or indirectly. In certain cases, an asset or liability is measured and reported at fair
value on a recurring basis, such as available-for-sale investment securities. In other cases,
management must rely on estimates or judgments to determine if an asset or liability not measured
at fair value warrants an impairment write-down or whether a valuation reserve should be
established. Given the inherent volatility, the use of fair value measurements may have a
significant impact on the carrying value of assets or liabilities, or result in material changes to
the financial statements, from period to period.
Detailed information regarding fair value measurements can be found in Note M Fair Value of
Financial Instruments to the Companys 2010 Audited Financial Statements. The following is a summary of
those assets that may be affected by fair value measurements, as well as a brief description of the
current accounting practices and valuation methodologies employed by the Company:
Available-for-Sale Investment Securities. Investment securities classified as
available-for-sale are measured and reported at fair value on a recurring basis. For most
securities, the fair value is based upon quoted market prices or determined by pricing models that
consider observable market data. However, the fair value of certain investment securities must be
based upon unobservable market data, such as nonbinding broker quotes and discounted cash flow
analysis or similar models, due to the absence of an active market for these securities. As a
result, managements determination of fair value for these securities is highly dependent on
subjective or complex judgments, estimates and assumptions, which could change materially between
periods.
Impaired Loans. For loans considered impaired, the amount of impairment loss recognized is
determined based on a discounted cash flow analysis or the fair value of the underlying collateral
if repayment is expected
solely from the sale of the collateral. The vast majority of the collateral securing impaired
loans is real estate, although it may also include accounts receivable and equipment, inventory or
similar personal property.
36
Table of Contents
Financial Condition at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010
Total assets declined by $5.4 million, or 0.9%, from $616.1 million at December 31, 2010 to
$610.7 million at June 30, 2011. At June 30, 2011, interest-earning assets were $581.3 million,
which included $380.4 million in gross loans, $146.7 million in investment securities
available-for-sale, $44.0 million in overnight investments, $8.6 million in interest-bearing
deposits in other banks and $1.6 million in loans held for sale. Interest-earning assets at
December 31, 2010 totaled $603.3 million and consisted of $399.8 million in gross loans, $140.6
million in investment securities available-for-sale, $57.9 million in overnight investments and
$5.0 million in interest-bearing deposits in other banks.
Shareholders equity equaled $173.6 million at June 30, 2011 compared to $177.1 million at
December 31, 2010. This decrease of $3.5 million was a result of the year-to-date loss of $6.0
million, offset by a $1.5 million increase, net of taxes, in accumulated other comprehensive income
relating to unrealized gains on investments available-for-sale and swaps and $1.0 million of
additional paid in capital relating to the share-based compensation expense.
The following table reflects selected ratios for the Company for the six months ended June 30,
2011 and 2010 and for the year ended December 31, 2010:
Selected Ratios
Six months ended | ||||||||||||
June 30, | For the year | |||||||||||
(annualized and unaudited) | ended December 31, | |||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | 2010* | ||||||||||
Return on Average Assets |
-1.95 | % | 0.14 | % | -2.81 | % | ||||||
Return on Average Equity |
-6.82 | % | 1.41 | % | -9.75 | % | ||||||
Period End Equity to Total Assets |
28.43 | % | 9.56 | % | 28.75 | % |
* | Derived from audited financial statements. |
Investments and Other Interest-earning Assets
The Companys investment portfolio consists of U.S. government agency securities, residential
mortgage-backed securities, municipal securities and other debt instruments. All of the residential
mortgage-backed securities held by the Company are backed by an agency of the U.S. government. All
of the Companys investment securities are categorized as available-for-sale. Securities
available-for-sale are carried at market value, with unrealized holding gains and losses reported
in other comprehensive income, net of tax. Investment securities were $146.7 million at June 30,
2011. This was a $6.1 million increase from the $140.6 million balance at December 31, 2010 and is
a result of the net purchase of $3.7 million of securities available for sale and a $2.4 million
improvement in the fair market value of the portfolio.
At the end of the second quarter of 2011, the Companys portfolio had a net unrealized gain of
$1.0 million compared to a $2.0 million net unrealized loss at December 31, 2010. The Company has
no securities with an unrealized loss deemed to be other than temporary at June 30, 2011. In
addition, there were no securities with an unrealized loss deemed to be other than temporary at
December 31, 2010.
At June 30, 2011, the Company had $44.0 million in federal funds sold, and $8.6 million in
interest-bearing deposits with other FDIC-insured financial institutions. This compares with $57.9
million in federal funds and $5.0 million in interest-bearing deposits at other FDIC-insured
financial institutions at December 31, 2010.
37
Table of Contents
Loans
The Company considers asset quality to be of primary importance, and employs a formal internal
loan review process to ensure adherence to the lending policy as approved by its board of
directors. Since its inception, the Company has promoted the separation of loan underwriting from
the loan production staff through its credit department. Currently, credit administration analysts
are responsible for underwriting and assigning proper risk grades for all loans with a total
exposure in excess of $500,000.
Underwriting is completed on standardized forms including a loan approval form and separate
credit memorandum. The credit memorandum includes a summary of the loans structure and a detailed
analysis of loan purpose, borrower strength (including individual and global cash flow worksheets),
repayment sources, collateral positions and guarantor strength. The memorandum further identifies
exceptions to policy and/or regulatory limits, total exposure, loan to value and risk grades. Loans
are approved or denied by varying levels of signature authority based on total exposure. Prior to
December 31, 2010, the Company employed an approval system consisting of individual signature
authorities, dual-signature authorities and a board-level loan committee. The approval structure
was revised as of January 1, 2011 to rely more heavily on approvals from a loan committee.
The Companys loan underwriting policy contains loan-to-value (LTV) limits that are at or
below levels required under regulatory guidance, when such guidance is available, including
limitations for non-real estate collateral, such as accounts receivable, inventory and marketable
securities. When applicable, the Company compares LTV with loan-to-cost (LTC) guidelines and
ultimately limits loan amounts to the lower of the two ratios. The Company also considers FICO
scores and strives to uphold a high standard when extending loans to individuals. LTV limits have
been selectively reduced in response to the recent economic cycle. In particular, loans
collateralized with 1-4 family properties have seen a reduction in their maximum LTV. The Company
has not underwritten any subprime, hybrid, no-documentation or low-documentation products.
All acquisition, construction and development loans, commercial and consumer, are subject to
the Companys policy, guidelines and procedures specifically designed to properly identify, monitor
and mitigate the risk associated with these loans. Loan officers receive and review a cost budget
from the borrower at the time a construction and development loan is originated. Loan draws are
monitored against the budgeted line items during the development period in order to identify
potential cost overruns. Individual draw requests are verified through review of supporting
invoices as well as site inspections performed by an external inspector. Additional periodic site
inspections are performed by loan officers at times that do not coincide with draw requests in
order to keep abreast of ongoing project conditions. Project status is reported to senior
management on an ongoing basis via the Companys monthly C&D and watch meetings. Reports generated
regarding acquisition, construction and development loans include status of the project, summary of
customer correspondence, site visit update when performed, review of risk grade and impairment
analysis, if applicable. As of June 30, 2011, approximately 80% of the Companys acquisition,
construction and development loan portfolio, commercial and consumer, falls under the watch list.
The Companys second mortgage exposure is primarily attributable to its home equity lines of
credit (HELOC) portfolio, which totals approximately
$55 million as of June 30, 2011. Approximately 60% of the
portfolio
is secured by second mortgages and approximately 40% is secured by first mortgages. For HELOCs in North Carolina,
which comprise the majority of the portfolio, the Company records a Request for Copy of Notice of
Sale with the county in which the property is located. All loans are assigned an internal risk
grade by the loan officer and monitored by the credit administration function in the same fashion
as commercial loans. Aside from loan committee, loan review and watch list meetings, loans are also
monitored for delinquency through bi-weekly past due meetings. As of June 30, 2011, there were no
accruing delinquent HELOCs in the Companys portfolio.
At June 30, 2011, total loans were $380.4 million compared to $399.8 million at December 31,
2010. This decrease included a $23.2 million reduction in the construction and development
portfolio, consistent with the Companys general intention and actions over the past ten months to
reduce residential construction and development exposure in its portfolio.
38
Table of Contents
The following table presents a summary of the loan portfolio at June 30, 2011 and at December
31, 2010, 2009, 2008, 2007 and 2006 (dollars in thousands).
Summary of Loans By Segment and Class
June 30, | December 31, | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2011 | % | 2010 | % | 2009 | % | 2008 | % | 2007 | % | 2006* | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Commercial: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Commercial and industrial |
$ | 45,056 | 12 | % | $ | 48,401 | 12 | % | $ | 41,980 | 11 | % | $ | 37,266 | 9 | % | $ | 23,011 | 6 | % | $ | 5,044 | 1 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Commercial real estate
owner occupied |
61,878 | 16 | % | 55,089 | 14 | % | 50,693 | 13 | % | 29,734 | 7 | % | 7,181 | 2 | % | 48 | 0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Commercial real estate -
investor income
producing |
111,349 | 29 | % | 110,407 | 28 | % | 112,508 | 28 | % | 90,172 | 23 | % | 55,759 | 14 | % | 11,403 | 3 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Acquisition, construction
and development |
64,662 | 17 | % | 87,846 | 22 | % | 100,668 | 25 | % | 123,759 | 31 | % | 88,666 | 22 | % | 17,887 | 4 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other commercial |
6,840 | 2 | % | 3,225 | 1 | % | 1,115 | 0 | % | 257 | 0 | % | 6,189 | 2 | % | | 0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total commercial loans |
289,785 | 76 | % | 304,968 | 76 | % | 306,964 | 77 | % | 281,188 | 76 | % | 180,806 | 80 | % | 34,382 | 81 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Consumer: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Residential mortgage |
21,767 | 6 | % | 21,716 | 5 | % | 20,577 | 5 | % | 13,916 | 3 | % | 2,490 | 1 | % | 522 | 0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Home equity lines of
credit |
56,481 | 15 | % | 56,968 | 14 | % | 52,026 | 13 | % | 48,625 | 12 | % | 25,829 | 6 | % | 6,800 | 2 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Residential construction |
6,048 | 1 | % | 9,051 | 2 | % | 11,639 | 3 | % | 19,873 | 5 | % | 9,816 | 2 | % | 575 | 0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other loans to individuals |
6,494 | 2 | % | 7,245 | 2 | % | 6,471 | 2 | % | 7,888 | 2 | % | 7,809 | 2 | % | 392 | 0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total consumer loans |
90,790 | 24 | % | 94,980 | 24 | % | 90,713 | 23 | % | 90,302 | 24 | % | 45,944 | 20 | % | 8,289 | 19 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total loans |
380,575 | 100 | % | 399,948 | 100 | % | 397,677 | 100 | % | 371,490 | 100 | % | 226,750 | 100 | % | 42,671 | 100 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Deferred fees |
(210 | ) | 0 | % | (119 | ) | 0 | % | (113 | ) | 0 | % | (218 | ) | 0 | % | (209 | ) | 0 | % | (24 | ) | 0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total loans, net
of deferre |
$ | 380,365 | 100 | % | $ | 399,829 | 100 | % | $ | 397,564 | 100 | % | $ | 371,272 | 100 | % | $ | 226,541 | 100 | % | $ | 42,647 | 100 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
* | - Park Sterling Bank commenced operations on October 25, 2006. |
Substantially all of the Companys loans are to customers in its immediate markets. In
the Charlotte market, the Company has a diversified mix of commercial real estate, owner-occupied
commercial real estate, commercial and small business loans, and a significant portfolio of HELOCs.
The Companys Wilmington operation has a heavier concentration of real estate related loans with a
smaller proportion of construction and development loans than Charlotte. Wilmington, like most
coastal markets, is heavily dependent on real estate and tourism to drive its economy. The Company
expects future growth in its newer markets of Charleston, Greenville and Raleigh. The Company
believes it is not dependent on any single customer or group of customers whose insolvency would
have a material adverse effect on its financial condition or results of operations.
Asset Quality and Allowance for Loan Losses
Due to unprecedented asset quality challenges and the global economic recession, the U.S.
banking industry has been experiencing significant financial challenges. The Companys senior
management works closely with credit administration and lending staff to ensure that adequate
resources are in place to proactively manage through the current slowdown in the real estate market
and overall economy. When a problem is identified, management is committed to assessing the
situation and moving quickly to minimize losses, while being sensitive to the borrowers
effectiveness as an operator, the long-term viability of the business or project and the borrowers
commitment to working with the Company to achieve an acceptable resolution of the credit.
39
Table of Contents
As a given loans credit quality changes, the responsibility for changing the borrowers risk
grade accordingly lies first with the Companys lending staff, and second with the credit
administration department. The process of determining the allowance for loan losses is
fundamentally driven by the risk grade system. In determining the allowance for loan losses and any
resulting provision to be charged against earnings, particular emphasis is placed on the results of
the loan review process. Consideration is also given to the value and adequacy of collateral,
economic conditions in the Companys market areas and other factors.
During the third quarter of 2010, the Company introduced refinements to its loan loss
allowance methodology. The principal change was the addition of a more comprehensive qualitative
component, which evaluates six environmental factors, including portfolio trends, portfolio
concentrations, general economic and market trends, changes in lending practices, regulatory
environment and other factors. Further details about this component of the Companys loan loss
allowance are outlined below. These refinements are intended to help management recognize expected
losses that may not be identified through the quantitative analysis of the Companys historical
loss experience. For loans determined to be impaired, the allowance is based on discounted cash
flows using the loans initial effective interest rate or the fair value of the collateral for
certain collateral dependent loans. This discounted cash flow analysis is inherently subjective, as
it requires material estimates, including the amounts and timing of future cash flows expected to
be received on impaired loans that may be susceptible to significant change. The allowance for loan
losses represents managements estimate of the appropriate level of reserve to provide for the risk
inherent in the Companys loan portfolio. The determination of the allowance for loan losses
involves a high degree of judgment and complexity.
The evaluation of the allowance for loan losses, which generally occurs at the end of each
quarter, consists of three components, as follows:
1) Specific Reserve Component. Specific reserves represent the current impairment estimate
on specific loans, which is an estimate of the amount for which it is probable that the
Company will be unable to collect all amounts due on such loans, if any, according to
contractual terms based on current information and events. Impairment measurement reflects
only a deterioration of credit quality and not changes in market rates that may cause a
change in the fair value of the impaired loan. The amount of impairment may be measured in
one of three ways, including (i) calculating the present value of expected future cash
flows, discounted at the loans interest rate and deducting estimated selling costs, if any;
(ii) observing quoted market prices for identical or similar instruments traded in active
markets, or employing model-based valuation techniques for which all significant assumptions
are observable in the market; and (iii) determining the fair value of collateral, for both
collateral dependent loans and for loans when foreclosure is probable.
2) Quantitative Reserve Component. Quantitative reserves represent the current loss
contingency estimate on pools of loans, which is an estimate of the amount for which it is
probable that the Company will be unable to collect all amounts due on homogeneous groups of
loans according to contractual terms should one or more events occur, excluding those loans
specifically identified above. Given the limited operating history of the Company, this
component of the allowance for loan losses is currently based on the historical loss
experience of comparable institutions. This comparable institution loss experience was
obtained by surveying peer group institutions, which include North Carolina-based community
banks that management believes originate similar types of loans to those originated by the
Company, as supplemented by discussions with peers and industry professionals. The estimated
historical loss rates are grouped into loans with similar risk characteristics by utilizing
the Companys internal risk grades applied on a consistent basis across all loan types.
Management is beginning the process of collecting and evaluating internal loan loss data for
the purpose of validating and/or modifying the current quantitative reserve calculation and
expects to have that work completed by the end of 2011.
40
Table of Contents
3) Qualitative Reserve Component. Qualitative reserves represent an estimate of the
amount for which it is probable that environmental factors will cause the aforementioned
loss contingency estimate to differ from historical results or other assumptions. The
Company has identified the following six environmental factors for inclusion in its
allowance methodology at this time:
i. | Portfolio trends, which may relate to such factors as type or level of loan origination activity, changes in asset quality (i.e., past due, special mention, non-performing) and/or changes in collateral values; |
ii. | Portfolio concentrations, which may relate to individual borrowers and/or guarantors, geographic regions, industry sectors, loan types and/or other factors; |
iii. | Economic and market trends, which may relate to trends and/or levels of gross domestic production, unemployment, bankruptcies, foreclosures, housing starts, housing prices, equity prices, competitor activities and/or other factors; |
iv. | Changes in lending practices, which may relate to changes in credit policies, procedures, systems or staff; |
v. | Regulatory environment, which may relate to modification and/or expansion of regulatory requirements or supervisory practices; and |
vi. | Other factors, which is intended to capture environmental factors not specifically identified above. |
Management believes that each of the above environmental factors addresses and provides for
the additional uncertainty when current conditions are not consistent with the conditions
prevailing in the prior periods utilized in the calculation of historical loss estimates. This
additional uncertainty may be heightened during periods of unusual market and/or economic
volatility, such as exists today.
Each qualitative component is evaluated on at least a quarterly basis by the Companys
Allowance Committee and is ranked as being Low, Moderate, High, or Very High. The first
three factors portfolio trends, portfolio concentrations and economic and market trends are
believed by management to present the most significant risk to the portfolio and are therefore
associated with both higher absolute and range of potential reserve percentage (from 0.05% to 0.15%
of outstanding performing loans). The last three factors changes in lending practices,
regulatory environment and other factors carry a slightly lower absolute and range of potential
reserve percentage (from 0.025% to 0.10% of outstanding performing loans). The reserve percentages
for each of the six factors are derived from available industry information combined with
management judgment. The Company may consider both trends and absolute levels of such factors, if
applicable.
Qualitative reserves represented 0.525% of outstanding performing loans as of June 30, 2011,
accounting for $1.9 million, or 17%, of the Companys allowance for loan losses. There was no
provision expense related to this component of allowance for the first six months of 2011 given
that outstanding performing loans declined during the period. Qualitative reserves represented
0.525% of outstanding performing loans as of December 31, 2010, accounting for $1.9 million, or
15%, of the Companys allowance for loan losses. Approximately $94 thousand, or 1%, of fourth
quarter 2010 provision expense related to this component of the allowance.
The Companys policy regarding past due loans normally requires a loan be placed on nonaccrual
status at 90 days past due. Charge-off to the allowance for loan losses may ensue following timely
collection efforts and a thorough review of payment sources. Further efforts are then pursued
through various means available. Loans carried in a nonaccrual status are generally secured by
collateral, which is considered in the determination of the allowance for loan losses, through the
impaired loan process.
The allowance for loan losses as a percentage of total loans increased to 2.96% at June 30,
2011 from 2.25% at June 30, 2010. The increase related to a refinement in allowance methodology to
incorporate a more comprehensive qualitative component, the effects of extended economic weakness
on portfolio trends, and specific reserves related to impaired loans. The allowance for loan losses
as a percentage of total loans decreased from 3.11% at December 31, 2010, due to the recognition of
loss on loans. The Company had net charge-offs of $8.9 million in the first six months of
2011 compared to $1.1 million in the same period of 2010 and $12.0 million for the year ended
December 31, 2010.
41
Table of Contents
While management believes that it uses the best information available to determine the
allowance for loan losses, and that its allowance for loan losses is maintained at a level
appropriate in light of the risk inherent in the Companys loan portfolio based on an assessment of
various factors affecting the loan portfolio, unforeseen market conditions could result in
adjustments to the allowance for loan losses, and net income could be significantly affected, if
circumstances differ substantially from the assumptions used in making the final determination. The
allowance for loan losses to total loans may further increase in 2011 if the Companys loan
portfolio deteriorates due to economic conditions or other factors.
The following table presents a summary of changes in the allowance for loan losses and
includes information regarding charge-offs, and selected coverage ratios for the six month period
ended June 30, 2011 and the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009, 2008, 2007 and 2006 (dollars in
thousands):
Allowance for Loan Losses
June 30, | December 31, | |||||||||||||||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006* | |||||||||||||||||||
Balance, beginning of period |
$ | 12,424 | $ | 7,402 | $ | 5,568 | $ | 3,398 | $ | 640 | $ | | ||||||||||||
Provision for loan losses |
7,707 | 17,005 | 3,272 | 2,544 | 2,758 | 640 | ||||||||||||||||||
Charge-offs: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Commercial: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Commercial and industrial |
$ | (506 | ) | $ | (1,338 | ) | $ | (8 | ) | $ | | $ | | $ | | |||||||||
Commercial real estate owner-occupied |
(136 | ) | (105 | ) | | | | | ||||||||||||||||
Commercial real estate investor income
producing |
(62 | ) | (840 | ) | | | | | ||||||||||||||||
Acquisition, construction and development |
(4,948 | ) | (7,752 | ) | (631 | ) | (374 | ) | | | ||||||||||||||
Other commercial |
(2,129 | ) | | | | | | |||||||||||||||||
Consumer: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Residential mortgage |
(571 | ) | (154 | ) | (720 | ) | | | | |||||||||||||||
Home equity lines of credit |
(1,103 | ) | (1,496 | ) | (33 | ) | | | | |||||||||||||||
Residential construction |
(222 | ) | (347 | ) | | | | | ||||||||||||||||
Other loans to individuals |
| (10 | ) | (46 | ) | | | | ||||||||||||||||
Total Charge-offs |
(9,677 | ) | (12,042 | ) | (1,438 | ) | (374 | ) | | | ||||||||||||||
Recoveries: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Commercial: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Commercial and industrial |
$ | 202 | $ | 2 | $ | | $ | | $ | | $ | | ||||||||||||
Commercial real estate owner-occupied |
| 16 | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||
Commercial real estate investor income
producing |
177 | 1 | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||
Acquisition, construction and development |
428 | 35 | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||
Other commercial |
3 | | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||
Consumer: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Residential mortgage |
5 | 4 | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||
Home equity lines of credit |
2 | 1 | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||
Residential construction |
| | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||
Other loans to individuals |
6 | | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||
Total Recoveries |
823 | 59 | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||
Net charge-offs |
(8,854 | ) | (11,983 | ) | (1,438 | ) | (374 | ) | | | ||||||||||||||
Balance, end of period |
$ | 11,277 | $ | 12,424 | $ | 7,402 | $ | 5,568 | $ | 3,398 | $ | 640 | ||||||||||||
Net charge-offs to total loans |
4.66 | % | 3.00 | % | 0.36 | % | 0.10 | % | 0.00 | % | 0.00 | % | ||||||||||||
Allowance for loan losses to total loans |
2.96 | % | 3.11 | % | 1.86 | % | 1.50 | % | 1.50 | % | 1.50 | % |
* | - Park Sterling Bank commenced operations on October 25, 2006 |
42
Table of Contents
Allocation of the Allowance for Loan Losses
June 30, | December 31, | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2011 | % | 2010 | % | 2009 | % | 2008 | % | 2007 | % | 2006 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Commercial: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Commercial and industrial |
$ | 922 | 12 | % | $ | 896 | 12 | % | $ | 529 | 11 | % | $ | | 10 | % | $ | | 10 | % | $ | | 12 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Commercial real estate
owner-occupied |
1,419 | 16 | % | 1,061 | 14 | % | 627 | 13 | % | | 8 | % | | 3 | % | | 0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Commercial real estate
investor income
producing |
2,489 | 29 | % | 2,105 | 28 | % | 1,496 | 28 | % | | 24 | % | | 25 | % | | 27 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Acquisition, construction
and development |
2,752 | 17 | % | 4,695 | 22 | % | 3,149 | 25 | % | | 33 | % | | 39 | % | | 42 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other commercial |
912 | 2 | % | 408 | 1 | % | | 0 | % | | 0 | % | | 3 | % | | 0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Consumer: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Residential mortgage |
300 | 6 | % | 320 | 5 | % | 547 | 5 | % | | 4 | % | | 1 | % | | 1 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Home equity lines of
credit |
910 | 15 | % | 871 | 14 | % | 835 | 13 | % | | 13 | % | | 12 | % | | 16 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Residential construction |
83 | 1 | % | 98 | 2 | % | 144 | 3 | % | | 6 | % | | 4 | % | | 1 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other loans to
individuals |
85 | 2 | % | 86 | 2 | % | 75 | 2 | % | | 2 | % | | 3 | % | | 1 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Unallocated |
1,405 | 0 | % | 1,884 | 0 | % | | 0 | % | 5,568 | 0 | % | 3,398 | 0 | % | 640 | 0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
$ | 11,277 | 100 | % | $ | 12,424 | 100 | % | $ | 7,402 | 100 | % | $ | 5,568 | 100 | % | $ | 3,398 | 100 | % | $ | 640 | 100 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
* | - Park Sterling Bank commenced operations on October 25, 2006 |
Nonperforming Assets
The Company grades loans with a risk grade scale of 1-9, with grades 1-5 representing pass
credits, and grades 6, 7, 8, and 9 representing special mention, substandard, doubtful, and
loss credit grades, respectively. Loans are reviewed on a regular basis internally and at least
annually by an external loan review group to ensure loans are graded appropriately. Credits are
reviewed for past due trends, declining cash flows, significant decline in collateral value,
weakened guarantor financial strength, management concerns, market conditions and other factors
that could jeopardize the repayment performance of the loan. Documentation deficiencies, to include
collateral perfection and outdated or inadequate financial information, are also considered in
grading loans.
All loans graded 6 or worse are included on the Companys list of watch loans, which
represent potential problem loans, and are updated and reported to both management and the loan and
risk committee of the board of directors on a monthly basis. Additionally, the watch list committee
may review other loans with more favorable ratings if there are concerns that the loan may become a
problem in the future. Due to unfavorable economic conditions, the Company currently includes a
special review of all grade 5 loans greater than $250,000 in its watch list committee. Impairment
analysis has been performed on all loans graded substandard (risk grade of 7 or worse) and
selected other loans as deemed appropriate. At June 30, 2011, the Company maintained watch loans
totaling $108.1 million, including $22.2 million of grade 5 loans, compared to $102.9 million at
December 31, 2010, including $33.6 million of grade 5 loans. Currently all loans on the
Companys watch list carry a risk grade of 5 or worse. The future level of watch loans cannot be
predicted, but rather will be determined by several factors, including overall economic conditions
in the markets served. It is the general policy of the Company to stop accruing interest income
when a loan is placed on nonaccrual status and any interest previously accrued but not collected is
reversed against current income. Generally, a loan is placed on nonaccrual status when it is over
90 days past due and there is reasonable doubt that all principal will be collected.
The Company employs one of three potential methods to determine the fair value of impaired
loans.
1) Fair value of collateral method. This is the most common method and is used when the
loan is
collateral dependent. In most cases, the Company will obtain an as is appraisal from a
third-party appraisal group. The fair value from that appraisal may be adjusted downward for
liquidation discounts for foreclosure or quick sale scenarios, as well as any applicable selling
costs.
43
Table of Contents
2) Cash flow method. This method is used when the loan is not collateral dependent and
involves the calculation of the net present value of the expected future cash flow from the loan,
discounted at the nominal interest rate of the loan.
3) Loan market value method. This is the method used least often by the Company. Fair value is
based on the offering price from a note buyer, in either the local community or a national loan
sale advisor.
With respect to nonaccruing commercial and consumer acquisition, construction and development
loans, the Company typically utilizes an as-is, or discounted, value to determine an
appropriate fair value. When appraising projects with an expected cash flow to be received over a
period of time, such as A&D/land development loans, fair value is determined using a discounted
cash flow methodology. When appropriate, the Company also requests that the appraiser include a
three- or six-month liquidation value in order to examine quick sale scenario proceeds. The Company
also accounts for expected selling cost when determining an appropriate property value.
Nonperforming loans, which consist of nonaccrual loans, accruing TDRs and accruing loans
for which payments are 90 days or more past due, decreased $7.7 million, or 22%, to $27.6 million,
or 7.25% of total loans at June 30, 2011 compared to $42.1 million, or 10.53%, of total loans at
December 31, 2010. Nonperforming assets, which consist of nonperforming loans, OREO and loans held for
sale decreased $10.8 million, or 24.9%, to $32.6 million at June 30, 2011 from $43.4 million at
December 31, 2010. There were no loans past due 90 days or more and still accruing interest at June
30, 2011, December 31, 2010 or June 30, 2010.
Nonaccrual loans were $25.6 million at June 30, 2011, a decrease of $15.3 million, or 37.4%,
from nonaccrual loans of $40.9 million at December 31, 2010. These nonaccrual loans consisted
primarily of loans involving commercial and consumer acquisition, construction and development
activity, which totaled $23.3 million, or 91.0%, of total nonaccrual loans at June 30, 2011
compared to $35.0 million, or 85.5%, of total nonaccrual loans at December 31, 2010. Nonaccruing
TDRs are included in the nonaccrual loan amounts noted. At June 30, 2011, nonaccruing TDR loans
were $12.9 million and had no recorded allowance. At December 31, 2010, nonaccruing TDR loans were
$24.9 million and had a recorded allowance of $2.4 million. Accruing TDRs totaled $2.0 million at
June 30, 2011, and $1.2 million at December 31, 2010.
Prior to being discontinued in the second half of 2010, the Companys underwriting policy
permitted interest reserves to be partially or fully funded by loan proceeds as a means to support
acquisition, construction and development loans. As of June 30, 2011, there are no acquisition,
construction and development loans kept current with bank-funded reserves.
At June 30, 2011, OREO totaled $3.5 million, which represented five residential lots, five
residential properties and two nonresidential properties, all of which are recorded at values based
on the Companys most recent appraisals. At December 31, 2010, OREO was $1.2 million. All OREO
properties have been written down to their respective fair values.
44
Table of Contents
The following table summarizes nonperforming assets at June 30, 2011 and December 31,
2010, 2009, 2008, 2007 and 2006 (dollars in thousands):
Nonperforming Assets
June 30, | December 31, | |||||||||||||||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006* | |||||||||||||||||||
Nonaccrual loans |
$ | 25,565 | $ | 40,911 | $ | 2,688 | $ | | $ | | $ | | ||||||||||||
Past due 90 days or more and accruing |
| | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||
Troubled debt restructuring |
2,002 | 1,198 | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||
Total nonperforming loans |
27,567 | 42,109 | 2,688 | | | | ||||||||||||||||||
Other real estate owned |
3,470 | 1,246 | 1,550 | 1,431 | | | ||||||||||||||||||
Loans held for sale |
1,600 | | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||
Total nonperforming assets |
$ | 32,637 | $ | 43,355 | $ | 4,238 | $ | 1,431 | $ | | $ | | ||||||||||||
Nonperforming loans to total loans |
7.25 | % | 10.53 | % | 0.68 | % | 0.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 0.00 | % | ||||||||||||
Nonperforming assets to total assets |
5.34 | % | 7.04 | % | 0.89 | % | 0.33 | % | 0.00 | % | 0.00 | % | ||||||||||||
Allowance for loan losses to
nonperforming assets |
34.55 | % | 28.66 | % | 175.00 | % | 389.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 0.00 | % |
* | - Park Sterling Bank commenced operations on October 25, 2006 |
Deposits and Other Borrowings
The Company offers a broad range of deposit instruments, including personal and business
checking accounts, individual retirement accounts, business and personal money market accounts and
certificates of deposit at competitive interest rates. Deposit account terms vary according to the
minimum balance required, the time periods the funds must remain on deposit and the interest rate,
among other factors. The Company regularly evaluates the internal cost of funds, surveys rates
offered by competing institutions, reviews cash flow requirements for lending and liquidity and
executes rate changes when deemed appropriate.
Total deposits decreased by $3.9 million, or 1.0%, from December 31, 2010 to June 30, 2011.
Core deposits (excluding brokered time deposits) increased $5.9 million, or 1.9%, while brokered
time deposits decreased by $9.8 million, or 9.2%. The increase in core deposits resulted from a
continued effort by management to obtain additional deposits from existing relationships and
shareholders along with targeted calling efforts by associates and board members.
Borrowed funds totaled $28.6 million at June 30, 2011, compared to $27.8 million at December
31, 2010.
45
Table of Contents
Results of Operations
The following table summarizes components of income and expense and the changes in those
components for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 (dollars in thousands):
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income (Loss)
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
June 30, | June 30, | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | Change | 2011 | 2010 | Change | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Unaudited) | $ | % | (Unaudited) | $ | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Gross interest income |
$ | 5,359 | $ | 5,638 | $ | (279 | ) | -4.9 | % | $ | 11,013 | $ | 11,289 | $ | (276 | ) | -2.4 | % | ||||||||||||||
Gross interest expense |
1,587 | 1,882 | (295 | ) | -15.7 | % | 3,285 | 3,782 | (497 | ) | -13.1 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
Net interest income |
3,772 | 3,756 | 16 | 0.4 | % | 7,728 | 7,507 | 221 | 2.9 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Provision for loan losses |
3,245 | 1,094 | 2,151 | 196.6 | % | 7,707 | 2,625 | 5,082 | 193.6 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Noninterest income |
44 | 24 | 20 | 83.3 | % | 116 | 62 | 54 | 87.1 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Noninterest expense |
5,474 | 2,477 | 2,997 | 121.0 | % | 9,708 | 4,519 | 5,189 | 114.8 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Net income (loss) before
taxes |
(4,903 | ) | 209 | (5,112 | ) | -2445.9 | % | (9,571 | ) | 425 | (9,996 | ) | -2352.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||
Income tax expense (benefit) |
(1,789 | ) | 36 | (1,825 | ) | -5069.4 | % | (3,570 | ) | 95 | (3,665 | ) | -3857.9 | % | ||||||||||||||||||
Net income (loss) |
$ | (3,114 | ) | $ | 173 | $ | (3,287 | ) | -1900.0 | % | $ | (6,001 | ) | $ | 330 | $ | (6,331 | ) | -1918.5 | % | ||||||||||||
Net Income (Loss). The net loss for the three months ended June 30, 2011 was $3.1 million
compared to net income of $0.2 million for the same period in 2010. This decrease of $3.3 million
resulted primarily from a $2.1 million increase in provision for loan losses and an increase in
noninterest expense of $3.0 million, partially offset by a $1.8 million increase in tax benefits.
The net loss for the six months ended June 30, 2011 was $6.0 million compared to net income of $0.3
million for the same period in 2010. This decrease of $6.3 million resulted primarily from a $5.1
million increase in provision for loan losses and an increase in noninterest expense of $5.2
million, partially offset by a $3.7 million increase in tax benefits and $0.3 million in increased
net interest and noninterest income.
Annualized return on average assets decreased during the six-month period ended June 30, 2011
to (1.95)% from .14% for the same period ended June 30, 2010. Annualized return on average equity
also decreased from 1.41% for the six-month period ended June 30, 2010 to (6.82)% for the same
period in 2011.
Net Interest Income. The Companys largest source of earnings is net interest income, which is
the difference between interest income on interest-earning assets and interest paid on deposits and
other interest-bearing liabilities. The primary factors that affect net interest income are changes
in volume and yields of earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities, which are affected, in
part, by managements responses to changes in interest rates through asset/liability management.
Net interest income increased modestly to $3.8 million for the three-month periods ended June 30,
2011 from $3.7 million for the same period in 2010. During the six-month period ended June 30,
2011, net interest income was $7.7 million as compared to $7.5 million in 2010, an increase of $0.2
million, or 2.7%.
Total average interest-earning assets increased by $118.0 million, or 25.4%, to $582.2 million
for the three months ended June 30, 2011 from $464.2 million for the same period in the previous
year. The Company experienced growth in the average balances of interest-earning assets,
specifically federal funds sold and investment securities available-for-sale, due to the investment
of the net proceeds from the Public Offering. The average balance of federal funds sold increased
$39.8 million along with an increase in average balance of investment securities available-for-sale
of $91.2 million.
46
Table of Contents
Total average interest-earning assets increased by $125.0 million, or 27.1%, to $586.3 million
for the six months ended June 30, 2011 from $461.3 million for the same period in the previous
year. The Company experienced growth in the average balances of interest-earning assets,
specifically federal funds sold and investment securities available-for-sale, due to the investment
of the net proceeds from the Public Offering. The average balance of federal funds sold increased
$38.6 million along with an increase in average balance of investment securities available-for-sale
of $92.3 million.
Average balances of total interest-bearing liabilities increased nominally in the second
quarter of 2011, with average total interest-bearing deposit balances increasing by $2.2 million,
or 0.6%, to $404.5 million from $402.3 million for the same period in 2010. Average brokered
deposits declined by $32.8 million from the previous year as management reduced the Companys
wholesale funding. This decline in brokered deposits was more than offset by an increase in other
average deposits of $49.6 million in the first six months of 2011 as compared to the same period in
2010. This increase in other average deposits includes an increase in average noninterest-bearing
deposits of $10.8 million, or 37.2%, to $39.7 million at June 30, 2011 and an increase in average
savings and money market deposits of $50.5 million, or 112.1%, to $95.5 million at June 30, 2011.
The Companys net interest margin decreased from 3.25% in the three-month period ended June
30, 2010 to 2.60% in the same period in 2011 as a result of lower yields on investments and the
loss of income on nonaccrual loans. Interest paid on funding sources for the three months ended
June 30, 2011 totaled $1.6 million, reflecting a 1.57% cost of interest-bearing liabilities. For
the same period in 2010, interest of $1.9 million was paid at a cost of interest-bearing
liabilities of 1.88%.
Average balances of total interest-bearing liabilities decreased in the first half of 2011,
with average total interest-bearing deposit balances decreasing by $2.7 million, or 0.7%, to $398.4
million in 2011 from $401.1 million for the same period in 2010. Average brokered deposits declined
by $32.1 million from the previous year as management reduced the Companys wholesale funding. This
decline in brokered deposits was more than offset by an increase in other average deposits of $45.3
million in the first half of 2011 as compared to the same period in 2010. This increase in other
average deposits includes an increase in average noninterest-bearing deposits of $10.9 million, or
40.0%, to $38.4 million at June 30, 2011 and an increase in average savings and money market
deposits of $39.8 million, or 92.6%, to $82.7 million at June 30, 2011.
The Companys net interest margin decreased from 3.28% in the six-month period ended June 30,
2010 to 2.66% in the same period in 2011 as a result of lower yields on investments and the loss of
income on nonaccrual loans. Interest paid on funding sources for the six months ended June 30, 2011
totaled $3.3 million, reflecting a 1.66% cost of interest-bearing liabilities. For the same period
in 2010, interest of $3.8 million was paid at a cost of interest-bearing liabilities of 1.90%.
47
Table of Contents
The following tables summarize net interest income and average yields and rates paid for the
periods indicated (dollars in thousands):
Average Balance Sheets and Net Interest Analysis
For the Three Months Ended June 30, | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Average | Income/ | Yield/ | Average | Income/ | Yield/ | |||||||||||||||||||
Balance | Expense | Rate | Balance | Expense | Rate | |||||||||||||||||||
Assets |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest-earning assets: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Loans, including fees (1) |
$ | 385,893 | $ | 4,450 | 4.63 | % | $ | 400,076 | $ | 5,169 | 5.18 | % | ||||||||||||
Federal funds sold |
56,611 | 33 | 0.23 | % | 16,813 | 9 | 0.21 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Taxable investment securities |
117,414 | 684 | 2.33 | % | 28,093 | 285 | 4.06 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Tax-exempt investment securities |
15,988 | 181 | 4.53 | % | 14,253 | 160 | 4.49 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Other interest-earning assets |
6,248 | 11 | 0.71 | % | 4,932 | 15 | 1.22 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Total interest-earning assets |
582,154 | 5,359 | 3.69 | % | 464,167 | 5,638 | 4.87 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Allowance for loan losses |
(11,684 | ) | (8,463 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Cash and due from banks |
29,415 | 8,014 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Premises and equipment |
4,705 | 4,621 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Other assets |
17,689 | 9,917 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Total assets |
$ | 622,279 | $ | 478,256 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Liabilities and stockholders equity |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest-bearing liabilities: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest-bearing demand |
$ | 11,968 | $ | 4 | 0.13 | % | $ | 11,113 | $ | 2 | 0.07 | % | ||||||||||||
Savings and money market |
95,548 | 172 | 0.72 | % | 45,053 | 87 | 0.77 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Time deposits core |
169,072 | 644 | 1.53 | % | 181,574 | 874 | 1.93 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Time deposits brokered |
99,553 | 436 | 1.76 | % | 132,394 | 586 | 1.78 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Total interest-bearing deposits |
376,141 | 1,256 | 1.34 | % | 370,134 | 1,549 | 1.68 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Federal Home Loan Bank advances |
20,000 | 141 | 2.83 | % | 20,000 | 141 | 2.83 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Other borrowings |
8,376 | 190 | 9.10 | % | 12,166 | 192 | 6.33 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Total borrowed funds |
28,376 | 331 | 4.68 | % | 32,166 | 333 | 4.15 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Total interest-bearing liabilities |
404,517 | 1,587 | 1.57 | % | 402,300 | 1,882 | 1.88 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Net interest rate spread |
3,772 | 2.12 | % | 3,756 | 3.00 | % | ||||||||||||||||||
Noninterest-bearing demand deposits |
39,711 | 28,939 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Other liabilities |
2,985 | 255 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Stockholders equity |
175,066 | 46,762 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Total liabilities and stockholders
equity |
$ | 622,279 | $ | 478,256 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Net interest margin |
2.60 | % | 3.25 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
(1) | Average loan balances include nonaccrual loans. |
48
Table of Contents
Average Balance Sheets and Net Interest Analysis
For the Six Months Ended June 30, | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Average | Income/ | Yield/ | Average | Income/ | Yield/ | |||||||||||||||||||
Balance | Expense | Rate | Balance | Expense | Rate | |||||||||||||||||||
Assets |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest-earning assets: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Loans, including fees (1) |
$ | 391,449 | $ | 9,208 | 4.74 | % | $ | 397,771 | $ | 10,312 | 5.23 | % | ||||||||||||
Federal funds sold |
54,679 | 63 | 0.23 | % | 16,044 | 18 | 0.23 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Taxable investment securities |
119,408 | 1,365 | 2.29 | % | 28,267 | 611 | 4.32 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Tax-exempt investment securities |
15,346 | 352 | 4.59 | % | 14,168 | 320 | 4.52 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Other interest-earning assets |
5,431 | 25 | 0.93 | % | 5,061 | 28 | 1.12 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Total interest-earning assets |
586,313 | 11,013 | 3.79 | % | 461,311 | 11,289 | 4.93 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Allowance for loan losses |
(12,012 | ) | (8,076 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Cash and due from banks |
19,014 | 7,839 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Premises and equipment |
4,590 | 4,631 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Other assets |
16,740 | 9,903 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Total assets |
$ | 614,645 | $ | 475,608 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Liabilities and stockholders equity |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest-bearing liabilities: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest-bearing demand |
$ | 11,213 | $ | 7 | 0.13 | % | $ | 9,300 | $ | 3 | 0.07 | % | ||||||||||||
Savings and money market |
82,706 | 310 | 0.76 | % | 42,939 | 169 | 0.79 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Time deposits core |
175,702 | 1,383 | 1.59 | % | 183,022 | 1,809 | 1.99 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Time deposits brokered |
100,618 | 923 | 1.85 | % | 132,710 | 1,135 | 1.72 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Total interest-bearing deposits |
370,239 | 2,623 | 1.43 | % | 367,971 | 3,116 | 1.71 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Federal Home Loan Bank advances |
20,000 | 282 | 2.84 | % | 20,000 | 279 | 2.81 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Other borrowings |
8,203 | 380 | 9.34 | % | 13,131 | 387 | 5.94 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Total borrowed funds |
28,203 | 662 | 4.73 | % | 33,131 | 666 | 4.05 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Total interest-bearing liabilities |
398,442 | 3,285 | 1.66 | % | 401,102 | 3,782 | 1.90 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Net interest rate spread |
7,728 | 2.13 | % | 7,507 | 3.03 | % | ||||||||||||||||||
Noninterest-bearing demand deposits |
38,387 | 27,429 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Other liabilities |
1,781 | 331 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Stockholders equity |
176,035 | 46,746 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Total liabilities and stockholders
equity |
$ | 614,645 | $ | 475,608 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Net interest margin |
2.66 | % | 3.28 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
(1) | Average loan balances include nonaccrual loans. |
49
Table of Contents
Provision for Loan Losses. The Companys provision for loan losses increased $2.2
million, or 196.6%, to $3.2 million during the three months ended June 30, 2011, from $1.1 million
during the corresponding period in 2010 and $5.1 million, or 193.6%, to $7.7 million during the six
months ended June 30, 2011, from $2.6 million during the corresponding period in 2011. The increase
in the provision resulted from the credit deterioration due to the continuing softening economy,
significant decline in real estate values and a refinement to the Companys allowance for loan loss
methodology, which introduced a more comprehensive qualitative component. The Company had $3.7
million in net charge-offs during the three months ended June 30, 2011 compared to $0.5 million
during the corresponding period in 2010. Year-to-date net charge-offs were $8.9 million compared to
$1.1 million during the first six months of 2010.
The ratio of the allowance for loan losses to total loans was 2.96% and 2.25% at June 30, 2011
and 2010, respectively. Management periodically evaluates its credit policies and procedures to
confirm that they effectively manage risk and facilitate appropriate internal controls.
Noninterest Income. Noninterest income has not historically been a major component of the
Companys earnings. The Company has a minimal amount of noninterest income from service charges.
Noninterest income increased from $24 thousand for the three months ended June 30, 2010 to $44
thousand for the same period in 2011. Noninterest income increased from $62 thousand for the six
months ended June 30, 2010 to $116 thousand for the same period in 2011. The growth in non-interest
income was primarily related to increased service charges due to deposit growth and gains on the
sale of bank vehicles.
Noninterest Expense. The level of noninterest expense substantially affects the Companys
profitability. Total noninterest expense was $5.5 million for the three months ended June 30, 2011
compared to $2.5 million for the same period in 2010. The increase of $3.0 million, or 121.0%, in
the three months ended June 30, 2011 compared to 2010 includes an increase in salaries and benefits
in the amount of $1.7 million as a result of an increase in full time equivalent employees
(FTEs), reflecting the Companys change in strategy. FTEs increased from 67 at March 31, 2011 to
82 at June 30, 2011, compared to an increase of 3 from 46 at March 31, 2010 to 49 at June 30, 2010.
The increase in noninterest expense for the three months ended June 30, 2011 also included $1.1
million of legal and professional fees of which approximately $0.6 million was merger-related.
Total noninterest expense was $9.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011 compared to
$4.5 million for the same period in 2010. The increase of $5.2 million, or 114.8%, in the six
months ended June 30, 2011 compared to 2010 includes an increase in salaries and benefits in the
amount of $2.9 million as a result of an increase in FTEs, reflecting the Companys change in
strategy. FTEs increased from 62 at December 31, 2010 to 82 June 30, 2011, compared to an increase
of 6 from 43 at December 31, 2009 to 49 at June 30, 2010. Legal and professional fees increased by
$1.4 million primarily as a result of the Company becoming a public entity. In addition,
approximately $0.6 million of these fees was merger-related.
50
Table of Contents
The following table presents components of noninterest expense for the three and six months
ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 (dollars in thousands):
Noninterest Expense
Three months ended | Six months ended | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
June 30, | June 30, | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | Change | 2011 | 2010 | Change | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Unaudited) | $ | % | (Unaudited) | $ | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Salaries and benefits |
$ | 2,975 | $ | 1,299 | $ | 1,676 | 129.0 | % | $ | 5,482 | $ | 2,551 | $ | 2,931 | 114.9 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Occupancy and equipment |
301 | 224 | 77 | 34.4 | % | 557 | 430 | 127 | 29.5 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Advertising and promotion |
87 | 96 | (9 | ) | -9.4 | % | 125 | 153 | (28 | ) | -18.3 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
Legal and professional fees |
1,205 | 83 | 1,122 | 1351.8 | % | 1,512 | 159 | 1,353 | 850.9 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Deposit charges and FDIC insurance |
196 | 182 | 14 | 7.7 | % | 483 | 358 | 125 | 34.9 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Data processing and outside |
128 | 100 | 28 | 28.0 | % | 251 | 193 | 58 | 30.1 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
service fees |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Directors fees |
45 | 47 | (2 | ) | 100.0 | % | 86 | 47 | 39 | 100.0 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||
Other real estate owned expense |
93 | 239 | (146 | ) | -61.1 | % | 328 | 275 | 53 | 19.3 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||
Other expenses |
444 | 207 | 237 | 114.5 | % | 884 | 353 | 531 | 150.4 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Total noninterest expense |
$ | 5,474 | $ | 2,477 | $ | 2,997 | 121.0 | % | $ | 9,708 | $ | 4,519 | $ | 5,189 | 114.8 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Income Taxes. The Company generates significant amounts of non-taxable income from
tax-exempt investment securities. Accordingly, the level of such income in relation to income
before taxes significantly affects the Companys effective tax rate. For the three months ended
June 30, 2011, the Company recognized an income tax benefit of $1.8 million compared to an income
tax expense of $0.04 million for the same period in 2010. For the six months ended June 30, 2011,
the Company recognized an income tax benefit of $3.6 million compared to an income tax expense of
$0.1 million for the same period in 2010. The effective tax rate for the six months ended June 30,
2011 is 37.30% compared to 22.35% for the same period in 2010. The change in the effective tax rate
was due to the amount of tax-exempt income relative to the size of pre-tax income. A tax benefit is
recorded if non-taxable income exceeds income before taxes, resulting in a reduction of total
income subject to income taxes.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Liquidity refers to the ability to manage future cash flows to meet the needs of depositors
and borrowers and to fund operations. Management strives to maintain sufficient liquidity to fund
future loan demand and to satisfy fluctuations in deposit levels. This is achieved primarily in the
form of available lines of credit from various correspondent banks, the FHLB, the Federal Reserve
Discount Window, and through an investment portfolio. In addition, the Company occasionally has
short-term investments at its primary correspondent bank in the form of federal funds sold.
Liquidity is governed by a board of directors approved Asset Liability Policy, administered by an
internal Senior Management Risk Committee (the Committee). The Committee reports on a monthly
basis asset/liability related matters to the Board of Directors Loan and Risk Committee.
The Companys internal liquidity ratio was 53.1% at June 30, 2011 compared to 50.5% at
December 31, 2010. In addition, at June 30, 2011, the Company had an additional $30.5 million of
credit available from the FHLB, $36.7 million from the Federal Reserve Discount Window, and
available lines of credit totaling $70.0 million from correspondent banks.
At June 30, 2011, the Company had $7.8 million of loan commitments outstanding, $66.4 million
of pre-approved but unused lines of credit and $4.0 million of standby letters of credit and
financial guarantees. In managements opinion, these commitments represent no more than normal
lending risk to the Company and will be funded from normal sources of liquidity. At December 31,
2010, the Company had $3.8 million of loan commitments outstanding, $69.6 million of pre-approved
but unused lines of credit and $2.9 million of standby letters of credit and financial guarantees.
51
Table of Contents
The Companys capital position is reflected in its shareholders equity, subject to certain
adjustments for regulatory purposes. Shareholders equity, or capital, is a measure of the
Companys net worth, soundness and viability. Shareholders equity on June 30, 2011 was $173.6
million compared to the December 31, 2010 balance of $177.1 million. In August 2010, the Company
completed its public offering of 23,100,000 shares of common stock at an initial purchase price of
$6.50 per share for an aggregate offering price of approximately $150.2 million. As a result of the
offering, the Company received net proceeds of approximately $140.2 million, after $9.0 million in
underwriting fees, including the $3.0 million in contingent fees (described in Note 3 to the
unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements included in this Form 10-Q), and
approximately $0.9 million in related expenses. Remaining proceeds have been invested in accordance
with the Companys investment policies.
Risk-based capital regulations adopted by the Federal Reserve Board and the FDIC require bank
holding companies and banks to achieve and maintain specified ratios of capital to risk-weighted
assets. The risk-based capital rules are designed to measure Tier 1 capital (consisting
generally of common shareholders equity, a limited amount of qualifying perpetual preferred stock and
trust preferred securities, and minority interests in consolidated subsidiaries, net of goodwill
and other intangible assets and certain other items) and total capital (consisting of Tier 1
capital and Tier 2 capital, which generally includes certain preferred stock, mandatory convertible
debt securities and term subordinated debt) in relation to the credit risk of both on- and
off-balance sheet items. Under the guidelines, one of four risk weights is applied to the different
on-balance sheet items. Off-balance sheet items, such as loan commitments, are also subject to risk
weighting after conversion to balance sheet equivalent amounts. All banks must maintain a minimum
total capital to total risk weighted assets ratio of 8.00%, at least half of which must be in the
form of core, or Tier 1, capital. These guidelines also specify that banks that are experiencing
internal growth or making acquisitions will be expected to maintain capital positions substantially
above the minimum supervisory levels. At June 30, 2011, the Company and the Bank satisfied the
respective minimum regulatory capital requirements, and were well capitalized within the meaning
of federal regulatory requirements. The Companys risk-weighted assets at June 30, 2011 and
December 31, 2010 were $413.9 million and $431.3 million, respectively. Actual capital levels and
minimum levels at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 were (dollars in thousands):
52
Table of Contents
Capital Ratios
To Be Well | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
For Capital | Capitalized Under | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Adequacy | Prompt Corrective | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Actual | Purposes | Actions Provisions | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Amount | Ratio | Amount | Ratio | Amount | Ratio | |||||||||||||||||||
Park Sterling Corporation |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
June 30, 2011 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Risk-Based Capital
Ratio |
$ | 178,905 | 43.23 | % | $ | 33,108 | 8.00 | % | $ | 41,385 | 10.00 | % | ||||||||||||
Tier 1 Capital Ratio |
166,762 | 40.30 | % | 16,554 | 4.00 | % | 24,831 | 6.00 | % | |||||||||||||||
Tier 1 Leverage Ratio |
166,762 | 27.07 | % | 24,641 | 4.00 | % | 30,802 | 5.00 | % | |||||||||||||||
December 31, 2010* |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Risk-Based Capital
Ratio |
$ | 185,768 | 43.06 | % | $ | 34,035 | 8.00 | % | $ | 42,543 | 10.00 | % | ||||||||||||
Tier 1 Capital Ratio |
173,395 | 40.20 | % | 17,017 | 4.00 | % | 25,525 | 6.00 | % | |||||||||||||||
Tier 1 Leverage Ratio |
173,395 | 27.39 | % | 22,227 | 4.00 | % | 27,784 | 5.00 | % | |||||||||||||||
Park Sterling Bank |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
June 30, 2011 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Risk-Based Capital
Ratio |
$ | 103,432 | 25.30 | % | $ | 32,710 | 8.00 | % | $ | 40,887 | 10.00 | % | ||||||||||||
Tier 1 Capital Ratio |
91,350 | 22.34 | % | 16,355 | 4.00 | % | 24,532 | 6.00 | % | |||||||||||||||
Tier 1 Leverage Ratio |
91,350 | 16.92 | % | 21,601 | 4.00 | % | 27,001 | 5.00 | % | |||||||||||||||
December 31, 2010 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Risk-Based Capital
Ratio |
$ | 185,768 | 43.06 | % | $ | 34,035 | 8.00 | % | $ | 42,543 | 10.00 | % | ||||||||||||
Tier 1 Capital Ratio |
173,395 | 40.20 | % | 17,017 | 4.00 | % | 25,525 | 6.00 | % | |||||||||||||||
Tier 1 Leverage Ratio |
173,395 | 27.39 | % | 22,227 | 4.00 | % | 27,784 | 5.00 | % |
* | The consolidated capital ratios presented herein, as of December 31, 2010, are those of the Bank, prior to the effectiveness of the Reorganization on January 1, 2011. |
The Bank has committed to its regulators to maintain a Tier 1 Leverage Ratio of at
least 10.00% for the three years following the Public Offering.
Disclosure of Contractual Obligations, Commitments and Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
In the ordinary course of operations, the Company enters into certain contractual obligations.
Such obligations include the funding of operations through debt issuances as well as leases for
premises and equipment.
Information about the Companys off-balance sheet risk exposure is presented in Note K of the
2010 Audited Financial Statements. As part of ongoing business, the Company has not participated in
transactions that generate relationships with unconsolidated entities or financial partnerships,
such as entities often referred to as special purpose entities (SPEs), which are generally
established for facilitating off-balance sheet arrangements or other contractually narrow or
limited purposes. As of June 30, 2011, the Company was not involved in any unconsolidated SPE
transactions.
53
Table of Contents
Impact of Inflation and Changing Prices
The Company has an asset and liability make-up that is distinctly different from that of an
entity with substantial investments in plant and inventory because the major portions of a
commercial banks assets are monetary in nature. As a result, the Companys performance may be
significantly influenced by changes in
interest rates. Although the Company and the banking industry are more affected by changes in
interest rates than by inflation in the prices of goods and services, inflation is a factor that
may influence interest rates. However, the frequency and magnitude of interest rate fluctuations do
not necessarily coincide with changes in the general inflation rate. Inflation does affect
operating expenses in that personnel expenses and the cost of supplies and outside services tend to
increase more during periods of high inflation.
Interest Rate Sensitivity
The Committee actively evaluates and manages interest rate risk using a process developed by
the Company. The Committee is also responsible for approving the Companys asset/liability
management policies, overseeing the formulation and implementation of strategies to improve balance
sheet positioning and earnings, and reviewing the Companys interest rate sensitivity position.
The primary measures that management uses to evaluate short-term interest rate risk include
(i) cumulative gap summary, which measures potential changes in cash flows should interest rates
rise or fall; (ii) net interest income at risk, which projects the impact of different interest
rate scenarios on net interest income over one-year and two-year time horizons; (iii) net income at
risk, which projects the impact of different interest rate scenarios on net income over one-year
and two-year time horizons; and (iv) economic value of equity at risk, which measures potential
long-term risk in the balance sheet by valuing the Companys assets and liabilities at market
under different interest rate scenarios.
These measures have historically been calculated under a simulation model prepared by an
independent correspondent bank assuming incremental 100 basis point shocks (or immediate shifts) in
interest rates up to a total increase or decrease of 300 basis points. These simulations estimate
the impact that various changes in the overall level of interest rates over a one- and two- year
time horizon would have on net interest income. The results help the Company develop strategies for
managing exposure to interest rate risk. Like any forecasting technique, interest rate simulation
modeling is based on a large number of assumptions. In this case, the assumptions relate primarily
to loan and deposit growth, asset and liability prepayments, interest rates and balance sheet
management strategies. Management believes that the assumptions are reasonable, both individually
and in the aggregate. Nevertheless, the simulation modeling process produces only a sophisticated
estimate, not a precise calculation of exposure. The overall interest rate risk management process
is subject to annual review by an outside professional services firm to ascertain its effectiveness
as required by federal regulations.
The Companys current guidelines for risk management call for preventive measures if a 300
basis point shock or immediate increase or decrease in short term rates over the next 12 months
would affect net interest income over the same period by more than 30.0%. The Company currently
operates well within these guidelines. As of June 30, 2011, based on the results of the simulation
model, the Company could expect net interest income to decrease by approximately 7.5% over 12
months if short-term interest rates immediately decreased by 300 basis points, which is unlikely
based on current rate levels. If short-term interest rates increased by 300 basis points, net
interest income could be expected to increase by approximately 8.2% over 12 months. At December 31,
2010, the simulation model results showed that the Company could expect net interest income to
decrease by approximately 4.8% over 12 months if short-term interest rates decreased by 300 basis
points, and if short-term interest rates increased by 300 basis points, net interest income could
be expected to increase by approximately 6.6% over 12 months.
The Company uses multiple interest rate swap agreements, accounted for as either cash flow or
fair value hedges, as part of the management of interest rate risk. During the three months ended
June 30, 2011, the Companys interest rate swap that was accounted for as a cash flow hedge
terminated. The swap had a notional amount of $40.0 million that was purchased on May 16, 2008 to
protect the Company from falling rates. The
Company received 6.22% fixed for a period of three years, and paid prime rate for the same
period, currently at 3.25%. During the three months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, the Company
recorded $0.1 million and $0.4 million of income, respectively, from this instrument. During the
six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, the Company recorded $0.3 million and $0.6 million of
income, respectively, from this instrument.
54
Table of Contents
The Company has entered into seven loan swaps, including one forward-starting swap, accounted
for as fair value hedges. The fair value mark on the forward-starting swap will be offset
when the associated loan closes and is marked to fair value in the fourth quarter of 2011. The
total original notional amount of these swaps was $17.4 million. These derivative instruments are
used to protect the Company from interest rate risk caused by changes in the LIBOR curve in
relation to certain designated fixed rate loans. These derivative instruments are carried at a fair
market value of $(0.6) million at June 30, 2011. The Company recorded interest expense on these
loan swaps of $0.2 million and $0.3 million in each of the three and six months ended June 30,
2011, and $0.1 million and $0.2 million in each of the three and six months ended June 30, 2010.
For cash flow hedges, the Company uses the dollar-offset method for assessing effectiveness
using the cumulative approach. The dollar-offset method compares the dollar amount of the change in
anticipated future cash flows of the hedging instrument with the dollar amount of the changes in
anticipated future cash flows of the risk being hedged over the assessment period. The cumulative
approach involves comparing the cumulative changes in the hedging instruments anticipated future
cash flows to the cumulative changes in the hedged transactions anticipated future cash flows.
Because the floating index and reset dates are based on identical terms, management believes that
the hedge relationship of the cumulative changes in expected future cash flow from the hedging
derivative and the cumulative changes in expected interest cash flows from the hedged exposure will
be highly effective.
Consistent with the risk management objective and the hedge accounting designation, management
measures the degree of hedge effectiveness by comparing the cumulative change in anticipated
interest cash flows from the hedged exposure over the hedging period to the cumulative change in
anticipated cash flows from the hedging derivative. Any difference between these two measures will
be deemed hedge ineffectiveness and recorded in current earnings. Management utilizes the
Hypothetical Derivative Method to compute the cumulative change in anticipated interest cash
flows from the hedged exposure. To the extent that the cumulative change in anticipated cash flows
from the hedging derivative offsets from 80% to 125% of the cumulative change in anticipated
interest cash flows from the hedged exposure, the hedge is deemed effective.
For fair value hedges, Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) Topic 815 requires that
the method selected for assessing hedge effectiveness must be reasonable, be defined at the
inception of the hedging relationship and be applied consistently throughout the hedging
relationship. The Company uses the dollar-offset method for assessing effectiveness using the
cumulative approach. The dollar-offset method compares the fair value of the hedging derivative
with the fair value of the hedged exposure. The cumulative approach involves comparing the
cumulative changes in the hedging derivatives fair value to the cumulative changes in the hedged
exposures fair value. The calculation of dollar offset is the change in clean fair value of
hedging derivative, divided by the change in fair value of the hedged exposure attributable to
changes in the LIBOR curve. To the extent that the cumulative change in fair value of the hedging
derivative offsets from 80% to 125% of the cumulative change in fair value of the hedged exposure,
the hedge will be deemed effective. The change in fair value of the hedging derivative and the
change in fair value of the hedged exposure are recorded in earnings. Any hedge ineffectiveness is
also reflected in current earnings.
Prime rate swaps (pay floating, received fixed) are recorded on the balance sheet in other
assets or liabilities at fair market value. Loan swaps (pay fixed, receive floating) are carried at
fair market value and are included in loans. Changes in fair value of the hedged loans have been
completely offset by the fair value changes in the derivatives, which are in contra asset accounts
included in loans.
See Note L of the 2010 Audited Financial Statements and Note 9 of the Companys unaudited
condensed financial statements included in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for further
discussion on the Companys derivative financial instruments and hedging activities.
55
Table of Contents
Financial institutions are subject to interest rate risk to the degree that their
interest-bearing liabilities, primarily deposits, mature or reprice more or less frequently, or on
a different basis, than their interest-earning assets, primarily loans and investment securities.
The match between the scheduled repricing and maturities of the Companys interest-earning assets
and liabilities within defined periods is referred to as gap analysis. At June 30, 2011, the
Companys cumulative one-year gap was a positive, or asset sensitive, $114.1 million, or 18.7% of
total assets. The Companys cumulative one-year gap at December 31, 2010 was $42.9 million, or
7.0%, of total assets.
The following table reflects the Companys rate sensitive assets and liabilities by maturity
as of June 30, 2011 (dollars in thousands). Variable rate loans are shown in the category of due
within three months because they reprice with changes in the prime lending rate. Fixed rate loans
are presented assuming the entire loan matures on the final due date, although payments are
actually made at regular intervals and are not reflected in this schedule.
56
Table of Contents
Interest Rate Gap Sensitivity
Within | Three | One Year | ||||||||||||||||||
Three | Months to | to Five | After | |||||||||||||||||
Months | One Year | Years | Five Years | Total | ||||||||||||||||
At June 30, 2011: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Interest-earning assets: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Interest-bearing deposits |
$ | 8,571 | $ | | $ | | $ | | $ | 8,571 | ||||||||||
Federal funds sold |
44,060 | | | | 44,060 | |||||||||||||||
Securities |
20,039 | 12,458 | 54,978 | 59,259 | 146,734 | |||||||||||||||
Loan held for sale |
| | | 1,600 | 1,600 | |||||||||||||||
Loans |
223,014 | 46,147 | 109,450 | 1,754 | 380,365 | |||||||||||||||
Other interest-earning assets |
| | | | | |||||||||||||||
Total interest-earning assets |
295,684 | 58,605 | 164,428 | 62,613 | 581,330 | |||||||||||||||
Interest-bearing liabilities: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Demand deposits |
2,726 | | 6,232 | 4,674 | 13,632 | |||||||||||||||
MMDA and savings |
97,242 | | | | 97,242 | |||||||||||||||
Time deposits |
61,580 | 93,821 | 95,475 | | 250,876 | |||||||||||||||
Short term borrowings |
1,661 | | | | 1,661 | |||||||||||||||
Long term borrowings |
| | 20,000 | 6,895 | 26,895 | |||||||||||||||
Total interest-bearing liabilities |
163,209 | 93,821 | 121,707 | 11,569 | 390,306 | |||||||||||||||
Derivatives |
14,279 | 2,555 | (13,238 | ) | (3,596 | ) | | |||||||||||||
Interest sensitivity gap |
$ | 146,754 | $ | (32,661 | ) | $ | 29,483 | $ | 47,448 | $ | 191,024 | |||||||||
Cummulative interest sensitivity
gap |
$ | 146,754 | $ | 114,093 | $ | 143,576 | $ | 191,024 | ||||||||||||
Percentage of total assets |
18.68 | % | ||||||||||||||||||
At December 31, 2010: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Interest-earning assets: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Interest bearing deposits |
$ | 5,040 | $ | | $ | | $ | | $ | 5,040 | ||||||||||
Federal funds sold |
57,905 | | | | 57,905 | |||||||||||||||
Securities |
| | 12,590 | 128,000 | 140,590 | |||||||||||||||
Loans |
245,364 | 16,532 | 133,416 | 4,517 | 399,829 | |||||||||||||||
Other interest-earning assets |
| | | 2,275 | 2,275 | |||||||||||||||
Total interest-earning assets |
308,309 | 16,532 | 146,006 | 134,792 | 605,639 | |||||||||||||||
Interest-bearing liabilities: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Demand deposits |
9,372 | | | | 9,372 | |||||||||||||||
MMDA and savings |
62,293 | | | | 62,293 | |||||||||||||||
Time deposits |
74,505 | 145,549 | 79,767 | | 299,821 | |||||||||||||||
Short term borrowings |
874 | | | | 874 | |||||||||||||||
Long term borrowings |
| | 20,000 | 6,895 | 26,895 | |||||||||||||||
Total interest-bearing liabilities |
147,044 | 145,549 | 99,767 | 6,895 | 399,255 | |||||||||||||||
Derivatives |
(29,316 | ) | 40,000 | (7,036 | ) | (3,648 | ) | | ||||||||||||
Interest sensitivity gap |
$ | 131,949 | $ | (89,017 | ) | $ | 39,203 | $ | 124,249 | $ | 206,384 | |||||||||
Cummulative interest sensitivity
gap |
$ | 131,949 | $ | 42,932 | $ | 82,135 | $ | 206,384 | ||||||||||||
Percentage of total assets |
6.97 | % | ||||||||||||||||||
57
Table of Contents
Item 3. | Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk. |
See Interest Rate Sensitivity in the Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations in Part I, Item 2 for disclosures about market risk.
Item 4. | Controls and Procedures |
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
As of the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, the management of
the Company, under the supervision and with the participation of the Companys Chief Executive
Officer and Chief Financial Officer, carried out an evaluation of the effectiveness of the
Companys disclosure controls and procedures as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Based on that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and the
Chief Financial Officer concluded that the Companys disclosure controls and procedures were
effective as of such date.
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
There was no change in the Companys internal control over financial reporting that occurred
during the second fiscal quarter of 2011 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the Companys internal control over financial reporting.
Part II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. | Legal Proceedings |
In the ordinary course of business, the Company may be a party to various legal proceedings from
time to time. There are no pending material legal proceedings to which the Company is a party or of
which any of its property is subject. In addition, the Company is not aware of any threatened
litigation, unasserted claims or assessments that could have a material adverse effect on its
business, operating results or financial condition.
Item 1A | Risk Factors |
The following risk factor is being provided in addition to the risk factors previously
disclosed in the 2010 Form 10-K and the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter
ended March 31, 2011.
A deterioration in the U.S. governments sovereign credit rating could result in an adverse
impact on the Companys business, financial condition and results of operations.
In July 2011, Moodys Investor Services and Standard & Poors Ratings
Services placed their U.S. sovereign debt rating on negative watch, actions believed to have been
influenced by the recent political impasse concerning the U.S.
statutory debt limit. In addition, on August 2, 2011 Fitch
Ratings, Inc. affirmed the U.S. sovereign debt rating but noted that
the rating was under review as the U.S. governments debt
obligations have increased at a pace that is not consistent with an
AAA sovereign credit rating. Even with an agreement
for the medium-term statutory debt limit, there is an underlying risk that lower growth, continued fiscal
challenges and a general lack of political consensus will result in a deterioration of the U.S. credit standing
over the longer term. Also, it is foreseeable that the ratings and
perceived creditworthiness of institutions, agencies or
instrumentalities directly linked to the U.S. government could also be adversely affected by any such downgrade. U.S. Treasury and agency securities are
key assets on the balance sheets of financial institutions, including the Company, and are widely used as collateral
by financial institutions to meet their day-to-day cash flows in the short-term debt market. A downgrade of the U.S.
sovereign credit ratings and perceived creditworthiness of U.S. government-related obligations could impact the
market value of such instruments as well as the ability to obtain funding that is collateralized by affected
instruments and the pricing of that funding when available. While the potential effects of a downgrade of the
U.S. sovereign debt rating are broad and impossible to accurately predict, they could include a widening of
sovereign and corporate credit spreads, devaluation of the U.S. dollar and a general market move away
from riskier assets, all of which could have a material adverse effect on the solvency of financial
institutions, including the Company.
58
Table of Contents
Item 2. | Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds |
During the three months ended June 30, 2011, the Company did not have any unregistered sales
of equity securities or repurchases of its common stock.
Item 3. | Defaults Upon Senior Securities |
Not applicable.
Item 4. | [Removed and Reserved] |
Item 5. | Other Information |
Not applicable.
59
Table of Contents
Item 6. | Exhibits |
The following documents are filed or furnished as exhibits to this report:
Exhibit | ||||
Number | Description of Exhibits | |||
2.1 | Agreement and Plan of Merger dated as of March 30, 2011 by
and between Park Sterling Corporation and Community Capital
Corporation, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 of
the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K (File No.
001-35032) filed April 5, 2011 |
|||
3.1 | Articles of Incorporation of the Company, incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 3.1 of the Companys Current Report on
Form 8-K (File No. 001-35032) filed January 13, 2011 |
|||
3.2 | Bylaws of the Company, incorporated by reference to Exhibit
3.2 of the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K (File No.
001-35032) filed January 13, 2011 |
|||
31.1 | Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to
Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
|||
31.2 | Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to
Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
|||
32.1 | Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
|||
32.2 | Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
|||
101 | Interactive data files pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation
S-T: (i) Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of June
30, 2011 and December 31, 2010; (ii) Condensed Consolidated
Statements of Income (Loss) for the three and six months
ended June 30, 2011 and 2010; (iii) Condensed Consolidated
Statements of Changes in Shareholders Equity for the six
months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010; (iv) Condensed
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the six months
ended June 30, 2011 and 2010; and (v) Notes to Condensed
Consolidated Financial Statements* |
* | The information is furnished and not filed for purposes of Sections 11 and 12 of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 |
60
Table of Contents
SIGNATURES
Under the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Company has duly caused this
report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
PARK STERLING CORPORATION |
||||
Date: August 4, 2011 | By: | /s/ James C. Cherry | ||
James C. Cherry | ||||
Chief Executive Officer (authorized officer) | ||||
Date: August 4, 2011 | By: | /s/ David L. Gaines | ||
David L. Gaines | ||||
Chief Financial Officer |
61
Table of Contents
Exhibit Index
Exhibit | ||||
Number | Description of Exhibits | |||
2.1 | Agreement and Plan of Merger as of dated March 30, 2011 by
and between Park Sterling Corporation and Community Capital
Corporation, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 of
the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K (File No.
001-35032) filed April 5, 2011 |
|||
3.1 | Articles of Incorporation of the Company, incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 3.1 of the Companys Current Report on
Form 8-K (File No. 001-35032) filed January 13, 2011 |
|||
3.2 | Bylaws of the Company, incorporated by reference to Exhibit
3.2 of the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K (File No.
001-35032) filed January 13, 2011 |
|||
31.1 | Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to
Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
|||
31.2 | Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to
Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
|||
32.1 | Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
|||
32.2 | Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
|||
101 | Interactive data files pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation
S-T: (i) Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of June
30, 2011 and December 31, 2010; (ii) Condensed Consolidated
Statements of Income (Loss) for the three and six months
ended June 30, 2011 and 2010; (iii) Condensed Consolidated
Statements of Changes in Shareholders Equity for the six
months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010; (iv) Condensed
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the six months
ended June 30, 2011 and 2010; and (v) Notes to Condensed
Consolidated Financial Statements* |
* | The information is furnished and not filed for purposes of Sections 11 and 12 of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 |
62