Table of Contents

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

x      QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2011

o         TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from                 to                

Commission File Number: 001-33494

KapStone Paper and Packaging Corporation

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)

KapStone Paper and Packaging Corporation

1101 Skokie Blvd., Suite 300

Northbrook, IL 60062

(Address of Principal Executive Offices including zip code)

Registrant’s Telephone Number, including area code (847) 239-8800

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.  Yes x No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).  Yes x No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Yes o No x

There were 46,322,812 shares of the Registrant’s Common Stock, $0.0001 par value, outstanding as of July 26, 2011, excluding 40,000 shares held as treasury shares.

Table of Contents

KapStone Paper and Packaging Corporation Index to Form 10-Q

TABLE OF CONTENTS

i

Table of Contents

PART 1. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1. - FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

KapStone Paper and Packaging Corporation

Consolidated Balance Sheets

(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)

See notes to consolidated financial statements

1

KapStone Paper and Packaging Corporation

Consolidated Statements of Income

(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)

(unaudited)

See notes to consolidated financial statements

2

KapStone Paper and Packaging Corporation

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

(In thousands)

(unaudited)

See notes to consolidated financial statements

3

KAPSTONE PAPER AND PACKAGING CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)

(unaudited)

1.                        Financial Statements

The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements of KapStone Paper and Packaging Corporation (the “Company,” “we,” “us,” “our” or “KapStone”) have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles for interim financial information, the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by generally accepted accounting principles for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of a normal recurring nature) considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. Operating results for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending December 31, 2011. For further information, refer to the consolidated financial statements and related footnotes included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010.

2.                        Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In June 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standard Update (“ASU”) No. 2011-05, “Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Presentation of Comprehensive Income,” which amends current comprehensive income presentation guidance.  The new guidance requires an entity to present comprehensive income in either a single continuous statement containing both net income and other comprehensive income or in two separate but consecutive statements. The guidance eliminates the option to present the components of other comprehensive income as part of the statement of changes in stockholders’ equity. The guidance is effective for annual and interim reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2011 and should be applied retrospectively. The Company does not expect the implementation of this standard to have a material impact on the consolidated financial statements.

In May 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-04, “Fair Value Measurements (Topic 820): Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in U.S. GAAP and IFRSs,” which amends ASC 820, “Fair Value Measurement”. The amended guidance clarifies the application of existing fair value measurement requirements and expands the disclosures for fair value measurements that use significant unobservable (Level 3) inputs. The guidance is effective for annual and interim reporting periods beginning on or after December 15, 2011. The Company does not expect the implementation of this standard to have a material impact on the consolidated financial statements.

In December 2010, the FASB issued ASU No. 2010-29, “Business Combinations: Disclosure of Supplementary Pro Forma Information for Business Combinations,” to clarify the reporting of pro forma financial information related to business combinations of public entities and to expand certain supplemental pro forma disclosures.  This guidance is effective prospectively for business combinations that occur on or after the beginning of the first annual reporting period beginning on or after December 15, 2010. No business combinations occurred during the six months ended June 30, 2011. The implementation of this standard did not have a material impact on the consolidated financial statements.

3.                        KPB Acquisition Earn-out Payment

On January 4, 2011, the Company negotiated the early settlement of its final contingent earn-out payment to International Paper Company relating to the Company’s 2007 acquisition of the Kraft Papers Business (“KPB”). The Company paid $49.7 million to settle this liability in January 2011, approximately $5.3 million less than the maximum contractual amount that the Company could have been required to pay had it settled the earn-out payment in April 2012 under the original contract terms.  The payment, representing additional acquisition consideration, was recorded as an addition to goodwill during the quarter ended March 31, 2011.  The Company amended its Senior Credit Agreement to allow for the early settlement of the earn-out and paid an amendment fee of $0.2 million.

4

4.                        Alternative Fuel Mixture Tax Credit

The Company recognized $22.2 million of alternative fuel mixture tax credits in the six months ended June 30, 2010 as a reduction of cost of goods sold. The tax credit expired on December 31, 2009.

5.                        Planned Maintenance Outage

Cost of sales for the six months ended June 30, 2010 included approximately $6.8 million for the tri-annual planned maintenance outage for the Company’s South Carolina unbleached kraft paper facility.   There were no annual planned maintenance outages during the six months ended June 30, 2011.

6.                        Inventories

Inventories consist of the following at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively:

7.                        Debt and Other Borrowings

Effective January 1, 2011, the Company entered into a financing agreement of $2.3 million at an annual interest rate of 1.75 percent for its annual property insurance premiums. The agreement requires the Company to pay consecutive monthly payments of $0.2 million through the term of the financing agreement ending on December 1, 2011.  As of June 30, 2011, $1.0 million was outstanding.

At June 30, 2011 the carrying amount and fair value of the Company’s debt was $102.9 million and $94.7 million, respectively.  At December 31, 2010 the carrying amount and fair value of the Company’s debt was $111.7 million and $95.2 million, respectively. The fair value of the Company’s long-term debt was estimated using an income approach based on current interest rates available to the Company for debt of similar terms and maturities. The debt was valued using Level 3 inputs in the fair value hierarchy which are significant unobservable inputs.

8.                        Income Taxes

The Company’s U.S. federal statutory income tax rate is 35 percent for 2011 and 2010. The Company’s effective tax rate for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 was 38.6 percent and 34.8 percent, respectively.  The effective tax rate increased in 2011 due to a lower expected benefit from the domestic manufacturing deduction. The 2010 effective tax rate also included a benefit related to a refundable tax credit from the inorganic content of black liquor burned in 2009.

The differences between the effective tax rate and the federal statutory tax rate for the six months ended June 30, 2011 were due to the impact of state tax net of the federal tax benefit and the benefit from the domestic manufacturing deduction. The differences between the effective tax rate and the federal statutory tax rate for the six months ended June 30, 2010 were due to the impact of state tax net of the federal tax benefit, the benefit related to a refundable tax credit from the inorganic content of the black liquor burned in 2009 and the benefit from the domestic manufacturing deduction.

Gross unrecognized tax benefits, including interest, as of June 30, 2011 increased by $0.6 million to $68.3 million from December 31, 2010.  Unrecognized tax benefits of $68.3 million are included in other long-term liabilities in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets.

In the normal course of business, the Company is subject to examination by taxing authorities. The Company’s open tax years are 2006 through 2009. The Internal Revenue Service’s audit of the Company’s income tax returns for 2007, 2008 and 2009 is ongoing.

5

9.                        Net Income Per Share

Basic and diluted net income per share is calculated as follows:

Unexercised stock options totaling 0.3 million were outstanding during the three and six months ended June 30, 2011, but were not included in the computation of diluted earnings per share because the options were anti-dilutive.

10.                 Pension Plan and Post Retirement Benefits

Defined Benefit Pension Plan

The KapStone Paper and Packaging Corporation Defined Benefit Pension Plan (the “Pension Plan”) provides benefits for approximately 1,000 union employees.

Net pension cost recognized for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 for the Pension Plan, is as follows:

KapStone funds the Pension Plan according to IRS funding requirements. Based on those limitations, KapStone funded $1.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and expects to fund an additional $1.3 million to the Pension Plan in 2011.

Defined Contribution Plans

The KapStone Defined Contribution Plan (the “Contribution Plan”) covers all eligible employees. The amount of the Company’s monthly contributions to the Contribution Plan are based on the matching of employee contributions, vest immediately for salaried, non-bargained hourly and certain union employees, and vest after three years for other union employees. For the three months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, the Company recognized expense of $1.0 million and $0.9 million, respectively, for matching contributions. For the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, the Company recognized expense of $2.4 million and $1.9 million, respectively, for matching contributions.

6

The Company’s Retirement Savings Plan, which covers all eligible salaried and non-bargained hourly employees, provides for an annual contribution based on an employee’s salary and age.  The Company contributions vest 100 percent after three years. For the three months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, the Company recognized expense of $0.6 million and $0.5 million, respectively. For the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, the Company recognized expense of $1.2 million and $1.0 million, respectively.

11.                 Stock-Based Compensation

On March 3, 2011, the Compensation Committee of the board of directors approved stock awards to executive officers, certain employees and directors. The 2011 awards included 285,461 stock option grants and 114,199 restricted stock units.

The Company accounts for stock awards in accordance with ASC 718, Compensation — Stock Compensation, which requires that the cost resulting from all share-based payment transactions be recognized as compensation cost over the vesting period based on the fair value of the instrument on the date of grant.

Total stock-based compensation expense related to the stock option and restricted stock unit grants for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 is as follows:

Total unrecognized stock-based compensation cost related to the stock option grants and restricted stock units as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 is as follows:

As of June 30, 2011, total unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested stock options and restricted stock units is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 1.8 years and 2.2 years, respectively.

Stock Options

Stock option awards vest as follows: 50% on the second anniversary of the grant date and the remaining 50% on the third anniversary of the grant date or upon the retirement of a grantee of such stock options who has reached the age 65.  Stock options awarded in 2011 have a contractual term of ten years and are subject to forfeiture should the recipient terminate his or her employment with the Company for certain reasons prior to vesting in his or her awards, or the occurrence of certain other events such as termination with cause. The exercise price of these stock options is based on the closing market price of our common stock on the date of grant ($16.61 for the 2011 awards described above) and compensation expense is recorded on an accelerated basis over the awards’ vesting periods.

The weighted average fair value of the KapStone stock options granted in March 2011 was $7.65. The fair value was calculated using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model based on the market price at the grant date and the weighted average assumptions specific to the underlying options. The expected volatility assumption is based on volatility of related industry stocks. The Company uses the “simplified method”, defined in Securities and Exchange Commission Staff Accounting Bulletin (“SAB”) No. 107, to determine the expected life assumption for all of its options.  The Company uses the “simplified method”, as permitted by SAB No. 110, as it does not have historical exercise data to provide a reasonable basis upon which to estimate expected life due

7

to the limited time its equity shares have been publicly traded. The risk-free interest rate was selected based upon yields of U.S. Treasury issues with a term similar to the expected life of the stock options.

The assumptions utilized for calculating the fair value of stock options during the period are as follows:

The following table summarizes stock options amounts and activity:

For the three and six months ended June 30, 2011, exercises of employee stock options totaled 82,013 shares and 107,920 shares, respectively, with cash proceeds to the Company of $0.4 million and $0.6 million, respectively.

Restricted Stock

Restricted stock units are restricted as to transferability until they vest three years from the grant date or upon the retirement of the grantee who has reached the age 65. These restricted stock units are subject to forfeiture should these employees terminate their employment with the Company for certain reasons prior to vesting in their award, or upon the occurrence of certain other events. The value of these restricted stock units is based on the closing market price of our common stock on the date of grant and compensation expense is recorded on a straight-line basis over the awards’ vesting periods.

The following table summarizes restricted stock units amounts and activity:

8

12.                 Contingencies

We are party to two legal claims arising from an accident which occurred during our 2009 annual planned maintenance outage.  While it is not possible to predict the outcome of this matter, based on our assessment of the facts and circumstances now known, we do not believe that this matter will have a material adverse effect on our financial position. The Company maintains insurance that may limit its financial exposure for defense costs, as well as liability, if any, for claims covered by the insurance.  However, actual outcomes may be different from those expected and could have a material effect on our results of operations or cash flows in a particular period.

We are subject to various legal proceedings arising from our operations. We establish reserves for claims and proceedings when it is probable that liabilities exist and where reasonable estimates can be made.  Based on our assessment of the facts and circumstances now known, we do not believe that these matters will have a material adverse effect on our financial position.

Item 2. — MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q includes forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. We have based these forward-looking statements on our current expectations and projections about future events. These forward-looking statements are subject to known and unknown risks, uncertainties and assumptions about us that may cause our actual results, levels of activity, performance or achievements to be materially different from any future results, levels of activity, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. In some cases, you can identify forward-looking statements by terminology such as “may,” “should,” “could,” “would,” “expect,” “plan,” “anticipate,” “believe,” “estimate,” “continue,” or the negative of such terms or other similar expressions. Factors that might cause or contribute to such a discrepancy include, but are not limited to, those described in Part I Item 1A of our Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010 and in our other Securities and Exchange Commission filings.  The information contained in this Form 10-Q represents our best judgment at the date of this report based on information currently available.  In providing forward-looking statements, KapStone does not intend, and does not undertake any duty or obligations, to update its statements as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.

The Company has one reportable segment. The Company manufactures and sells kraft paper, linerboard, saturating kraft (sold under the DuraSorb® brand name) and unbleached folding carton board (sold under the Kraftpak® brand name). These products are sold to domestic and export customers who convert into end market finished products.

The following discussion should be read in conjunction with our Consolidated Financial Statements and related Notes thereto included elsewhere in this report.

Comparison of Results of Operations for the Three Months Ended June 30, 2011 and the Three Months Ended June 30, 2010

9

Net sales for the quarter ended June 30, 2011 were $214.8 million compared to $199.1 million for the second quarter of 2010, an increase of $15.7 million or 7.9 percent. The increase in net sales was driven by $15.8 million of higher average selling prices in the second quarter of 2011 compared to the second quarter of 2010, mainly due to full realization of price increases announced in 2010 and partial realization of price increases announced in 2011. Average selling price per ton for the quarter ended June 30, 2011 was $633 compared to $585 for the prior year’s second quarter. Net sales also increased by $2.0 million due to higher unit sales partially offset by $1.9 million of a less favorable product mix and $2.1 million of lower lumber sales. Exchange rates positively impacted net sales by $1.9 million.

The following represents the Company’s tons of paper sold by product line:

Tons of paper sold for the quarter ended June 30, 2011 were 329,081 tons compared to 325,657 tons for the quarter ended June 30, 2010, an increase of 3,424 tons or 1.1 percent. Export linerboard sales volume increased by 14.1 percent reflecting higher demand in Europe. DuraSorb® sales volume declined 9.2 percent due to lower demand in Asia.

Cost of sales, excluding depreciation and amortization expense, for the quarter ended June 30, 2011 was $143.1 million compared to $146.7 million for the second quarter of 2010, a decrease of $3.6 million, or 2.4 percent. The decrease in cost of sales was mainly due to $4.4 million from productivity gains partially offset by $0.9 million of higher sales volume.

Freight and distribution expenses for the quarter ended June 30, 2011 totaled $19.7 million compared to $20.0 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2010. The decrease of $0.3 million was primarily due to $0.9 million of lower warehousing costs and $0.3 million as a result of a higher percentage of export linerboard shipments in which freight costs are paid by the customer.  Partially offsetting the decrease in freight and distribution expenses was $0.5 million due to inflation on fuel costs and $0.4 million of higher sales volume and other cost increases.

Selling, general and administrative expenses for each of the quarters ended June 30, 2011 and June 30, 2010 totaled $8.9 million. Selling, general and administrative expenses for the second quarter of 2011 included $1.1 million of lower stock compensation expense as the 2010 stock award grants occurred in May compared to March in 2011 offset by $0.5 million of due diligence expenses and higher compensation and benefit cost expenses. For the quarter ended June 30, 2011, selling, general and administrative expenses as a percentage of net sales decreased to 4.1 percent from 4.5 percent in the quarter ended June 30, 2010.

Depreciation and amortization expenses for the quarter ended June 30, 2011 totaled $12.8 million compared to $11.1 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2010. The increase of $1.7 million was primarily due to $38.3 million of capital spending in 2010 and $0.7 million of accelerated depreciation.

Foreign exchange gains for the quarter ended June 30, 2011 were negligible compared to a foreign exchange loss of $0.5 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2010. The change reflects the weakening of the U.S. dollar compared to the Euro in the quarter ended June 30, 2011.

Interest expense for the quarters ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 was $1.1 million and $1.3 million, respectively. Interest expense reflects interest on the Company’s senior credit agreement and amortization of debt issuance costs. Interest expense was $0.2 million lower in the quarter ended June 30, 2011 primarily due to lower term loan balances.

10

Table of Contents

Provision for income taxes for the quarters ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 was $11.4 million and $3.6 million, respectively, reflecting an effective tax rate of 38.6 percent for the quarter ended June 30, 2011 compared to 33.7 percent for the similar period in 2010. The higher provision for income taxes in the second quarter of 2011 primarily reflects an $18.9 million increase in pre-tax income and a higher effective tax rate.  The effective tax rate increased in 2011 due to a lower expected benefit from the domestic manufacturing deduction. The 2010 effective tax rate also included a benefit related to a refundable tax credit from the inorganic content of black liquor.

Comparison of Results of Operations for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2011 and the Six Months Ended June 30, 2010

Net sales for the six months ended June 30, 2011 were $421.5 million compared to $375.6 million for the first six months of 2010, an increase of $45.9 million or 12.2 percent. The increase in net sales was driven by $41.3 million of higher average selling prices in the first six months of 2011 compared to the first six months of 2010, mainly due to full realization of price increases announced in 2010 and partial realization of price increases announced in 2011. Average selling price per ton for the first six months of 2011 was $626 compared to $560 for the first six months of 2010. Net sales also increased by $6.0 million due to higher unit sales partially offset by $0.6 million of a less favorable product mix and $2.4 million of lower lumber sales. Exchange rates positively impacted net sales by $1.6 million.

The following represents the Company’s tons of paper sold by product line:

Tons of paper sold for the first six months of 2011 was 652,454 tons compared to 641,962 tons for the first six months of 2010, an increase of 10,492 tons or 1.6 percent. Domestic linerboard sales volume increased by 7.6 percent reflecting higher demand for lightweight grades. The 7.3 percent increase in Kraftpak® sales volume reflects a combination of new customers and new product applications with existing customers. DuraSorb® sales volume declined 5.1 percent due to lower demand in Asia.

11

Table of Contents

Cost of sales, excluding depreciation and amortization expense, for the six months ended June 30, 2011 was $285.8 million compared to $277.0 million for the first six months of 2010, an increase of $8.8 million, or 3.2 percent. The increase in cost of sales was mainly due to a $22.2 million decrease in alternative fuel mixture tax credits (which expired on December 31, 2009) and $1.5 million of higher sales volume. Partially offsetting the increase in cost of sales was $6.8 million related to the 2010 Charleston mill planned maintenance outage, $5.7 million from productivity gains and $2.2 million due to deflation on input costs.

Freight and distribution expenses for the six months ended June 30, 2011 totaled $37.5 million compared to $36.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2010. The increase of $1.4 million was primarily due to $1.2 million of inflation on fuel costs and $1.1 million of higher sales volume and mix changes partially offset by $0.9 million of lower warehousing costs.

Selling, general and administrative expenses for the six months ended June 30, 2011 totaled $18.2 million compared to $16.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2010. The increase of $2.2 million reflects $0.6 million of higher compensation and benefit cost expenses, $0.6 million of due diligence expenses and $1.0 million of other cost increases. For the six months ended June 30, 2011 and June 30, 2010, selling, general and administrative expenses as a percentage of net sales was 4.3 percent.

Depreciation and amortization expenses for the six months ended June 30, 2011 totaled $24.6 million compared to $22.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2010. The increase of $2.1 million was primarily due to $38.3 million of capital spending in 2010 and $0.7 million of accelerated depreciation.

Foreign exchange gains for the six months ended June 30, 2011 were $0.3 million compared to a foreign exchange loss of $0.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2010. The change reflects the weakening of the U.S. dollar compared to the Euro in the first six months of 2011.

Interest expense for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 was $2.2 million and $2.9 million, respectively. Interest expense reflects interest on the Company’s senior credit agreement and amortization of debt issuance costs. Interest expense was $0.7 million lower in the first six months of 2011 primarily due to $0.4 million of lower amortization of debt issuance costs and $0.3 million due to lower term loan balances.

Provision for income taxes for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 was $20.9 million and $7.2 million, respectively, reflecting an effective tax rate of 38.6 percent for the six months ended June 30, 2011 compared to 34.8 percent for the similar period in 2010. The higher provision for income taxes in the first half of 2011 primarily reflects a $33.5 million increase in pre-tax income and a higher effective tax rate.  The effective tax rate increased in 2011 due to a lower expected benefit from the domestic manufacturing deduction. The 2010 effective tax rate also included a benefit related to the refundable tax credit from the inorganic content of black liquor.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

KPB Acquisition Earn-Out Payment

On January 4, 2011, the Company negotiated the early settlement of its final contingent earn-out payment to International Paper Company (“IP”) relating to the Company’s previous acquisition of the Kraft Papers Business. The Company paid $49.7 million to settle this liability in January 2011, approximately $5.3 million less than the maximum contractual amount that the Company could have been required to pay had it settled the earn-out payment in April 2012 under the original contract terms.  The payment, representing additional acquisition consideration, was recorded as an addition to goodwill during the six months ended June 30, 2011.  The Company has fully settled its contingent earn-out liability with IP and this payment will not recur in the future.

Senior Credit Agreement

The Company’s Senior Credit Agreement provides for an aggregate of up to $515 million consisting of a $390 million term A loan facility, a $25 million term B loan facility and a $100 million revolving credit facility, including a letter of credit subfacility (collectively, the “Senior Credit Facilities”).  The Senior Credit Facilities are guaranteed by KapStone Kraft and our other domestic subsidiaries and are secured by substantially all of our assets, the capital stock of our guarantor subsidiaries and up to 66% of the capital stock of our foreign subsidiaries.

12

Table of Contents

For the six months ended June 30, 2011, the Company borrowed and repaid $7.6 million from its revolving credit facility. The Company utilizes its revolving credit facility for general business purposes.

Debt Covenants

At June 30, 2011, the Company was in compliance with all applicable covenants in the Senior Credit Agreement.

Other Borrowings

Effective January 1, 2011, the Company entered into a financing agreement of $2.3 million at an annual interest rate of 1.75 percent for the Company’s annual property insurance premium. The agreement requires the Company to pay consecutive monthly payments of $0.2 million through the term of the financing agreement ending on December 1, 2011.  As of June 30, 2011, $1.0 million was outstanding.

Income taxes

The Company has recorded a $68.3 million tax contingency reserve at June 30, 2011 for an unrecognized tax benefit relating to the taxability of alternative fuel mixture tax credits (“AFMTC”). The Company has taken the position that the AFMTC is similar to a federal excise tax and as a result is not taxable. To date, the Internal Revenue Service has not issued guidance concerning the taxability of the AFMTC.

The Company does not expect to pay federal cash taxes during 2011.

Sources and Uses of Cash

Cash and cash equivalents decreased by $17.5 million from December 31, 2010, reflecting $53.1 million of net cash provided by operating activities, $62.6 million of net cash used in investing activities and $8.0 million of net cash used in financing activities.

Net cash provided by operating activities was $53.1 million primarily due to net income of $33.3 million for the first six months of 2011 and $41.7 million of non-cash charges. Changes in operating assets and liabilities used $21.9 million of cash. Net cash provided by operating activities decreased by $4.9 million in the six months ended June 30, 2011 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2010 due to a $33.7 million decrease in operating assets and liabilities partially offset by $19.8 million of increased net income and $9.0 million of higher non-cash charges.  The $33.7 million decrease of operating assets and liabilities was mainly due to $13.2 million of tax refunds received in June 2010, $13.1 million of AFMTC payments received in the first six months of 2010 and $9.7 million of incentive compensation paid in 2011. Non-cash charges increased by $9.0 million primarily due to $7.6 million of higher deferred income taxes.

Net cash used in investing activities was $62.6 million reflecting a $49.7 million contingent earn-out payment made to IP and $12.9 million of capital expenditures. For the six months ended June 30, 2011, capital expenditures were mainly spent on equipment upgrades and replacements at the paper mills.  Net cash used in investing activities increased by $47.7 million in the six months ended June 30, 2011 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2010 mainly due to the $49.7 million contingent earn-out payment.

Net cash used in financing activities was $8.0 million and reflects $9.4 million of net term loan repayments partially offset by $1.0 million of net other borrowings and $0.6 million of proceeds from exercises of stock options. Net cash used in financing activities decreased by $15.7 million in the six months ended June

13

30, 2011 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2010 due to a lower amount of debt repayments in the first six months of 2011.

Future Cash Needs

We expect that cash generated from operating activities, and if needed, the ability to draw from our revolving credit facility, which has a current availability of $88.6 million, will be sufficient to meet anticipated 2011 cash needs. The Company expects to spend approximately $28.0 million on capital expenditures for the balance of 2011. In addition, the Company has $9.4 million of required long-term debt repayments for the balance of 2011 and expects to fund an additional $1.3 million to its pension plan in 2011.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We have not entered into any off-balance sheet financing arrangements and have not established any special purpose entities. We have not guaranteed any debt or commitments of other entities or entered into any options on non-financial assets.

Item 3. — QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

Market risk is the sensitivity of income to changes in interest rates, commodity prices, equity prices, and other market-driven rates or prices.

Under KapStone Kraft’s Senior Credit Facilities, we have two term loans totaling $105.5 million outstanding at June 30, 2011.  The maturity date is June 12, 2013 with respect to the term A loan facility and the revolving credit facility, and June 12, 2015 with respect to the term B loan facility, provided that the maturity date will not be so accelerated if, among other things, the total leverage ratio as of the end of the then most recent fiscal quarter, is less than 2.0 to 1.0.

Changes in market rates may impact the base rate in our Senior Credit Agreement. For instance, if the bank’s LIBOR rate was to increase or decrease by one percentage point (1.0%), our annual interest expense would change by approximately $1.0 million based upon our expected future monthly loan balances per our existing repayment schedule.

We are exposed to price fluctuations of certain commodities used in production. Key raw materials and energy used in the production process include roundwood and woodchips, fuel oil, electricity and caustic soda. We purchase these raw materials and energy at market prices, and do not use forward contracts or other financial instruments to hedge our exposure to price risk related to these commodities. We have two contracts to purchase coal at fixed prices with one expiring on December 31, 2011 and the other on December 31, 2012.

We are exposed to price fluctuations in the price of our finished goods. The prices we charge for our products are primarily based on market conditions.

We are exposed to currency fluctuations as we invoice certain European customers in Euros. The Company did not use forward contracts to reduce the impact of currency fluctuations during the six months ended June 30, 2011.  No such contracts were outstanding at June 30, 2011.

Item 4. — CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

As of the end of the period covered by this report, our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer carried out an evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures, as required by Rule 13a-15(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Based upon that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of June 30, 2011.

There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting during the three months ended June 30, 2011 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

14

PART II. — OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1.

LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

There have been no material changes in the legal proceedings described in our Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010.

ITEM 1A.

RISK FACTORS

There have been no material changes from the Risk Factors described in our Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010.

ITEM 2.

UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS

None.

ITEM 3.

DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES

None.

ITEM 4.

Removed and Reserved

ITEM 5.

OTHER INFORMATION

None.

15

Table of Contents

ITEM 6.

EXHIBITS

The following Exhibits are filed as part of this report.

16

Table of Contents

SIGNATURE

In accordance with the requirements of the Exchange Act, the registrant caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

17