Attached files

file filename
EX-32.2 - EXHIBIT 32.2 - FEDERAL REALTY INVESTMENT TRUSTdex322.htm
EX-32.1 - EXHIBIT 32.1 - FEDERAL REALTY INVESTMENT TRUSTdex321.htm
EX-31.2 - EXHIBIT 31.2 - FEDERAL REALTY INVESTMENT TRUSTdex312.htm
EX-31.1 - EXHIBIT 31.1 - FEDERAL REALTY INVESTMENT TRUSTdex311.htm
EXCEL - IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT - FEDERAL REALTY INVESTMENT TRUSTFinancial_Report.xls
Table of Contents

 

 

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

 

 

FORM 10-Q

 

 

 

x QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO THE SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2011

OR

 

¨ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from              to             

Commission file number: 1-07533

 

 

FEDERAL REALTY INVESTMENT TRUST

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Declaration of Trust)

 

 

 

Maryland   52-0782497
(State of Organization)  

(IRS Employer

Identification No.)

1626 East Jefferson Street,

Rockville, Maryland

  20852
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)   (Zip Code)

(301) 998-8100

(Registrant’s Telephone Number, Including Area Code)

 

 

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    x  Yes    ¨  No

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).    x  Yes    ¨  No

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.:

 

Large Accelerated Filer   x    Accelerated Filer   ¨
Non-Accelerated Filer   ¨  (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)    Smaller reporting company   ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).     ¨  Yes    x  No

The number of Registrant’s common shares outstanding on July 29, 2011 was 62,805,852.

 

 

 


Table of Contents

FEDERAL REALTY INVESTMENT TRUST

QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q

QUARTER ENDED JUNE 30, 2011

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

     3   
Item 1.  

Financial Statements

     3   
 

Consolidated Balance Sheets as of June 30, 2011 (unaudited) and December 31, 2010

     4   
 

Consolidated Statements of Operations (unaudited) for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010

     5   
 

Consolidated Statement of Shareholders’ Equity (unaudited) for the six months ended June 30, 2011

     6   
 

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (unaudited) for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010

     7   
 

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)

     8   
Item 2.  

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

     15   
Item 3.  

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

     32   
Item 4.  

Controls and Procedures

     32   

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

     33   
Item 1.  

Legal Proceedings

     33   
Item 1A.  

Risk Factors

     33   
Item 2.  

Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

     33   
Item 3.  

Defaults Upon Senior Securities

     33   
Item 4.  

[Removed and Reserved]

     34   
Item 5.  

Other Information

     34   
Item 6.  

Exhibits

     34   

SIGNATURES

     35   

 

2


Table of Contents

PART I—FINANCIAL INFORMATION

 

ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

The following balance sheet as of December 31, 2010, which has been derived from audited financial statements, and unaudited interim financial statements have been prepared pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. Certain information and note disclosures normally included in annual financial statements prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) have been omitted pursuant to those rules and regulations, although the company believes that the disclosures made are adequate to make the information not misleading. It is suggested that these financial statements be read in conjunction with the financial statements and notes thereto included in the company’s latest Annual Report on Form 10-K. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal, recurring adjustments) necessary for a fair presentation for the periods presented have been included. The results of operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the full year.

 

3


Table of Contents

Federal Realty Investment Trust

Consolidated Balance Sheets

 

     June 30,
2011
    December 31,
2010
 
     (In thousands, except share data)  
     (Unaudited)        

ASSETS

    

Real estate, at cost

    

Operating (including $139,785 and $78,846 of consolidated variable interest entities, respectively)

   $ 3,795,754      $ 3,695,848   

Construction-in-progress

     180,740        163,200   

Assets held for sale/disposal (discontinued operations) (including $0 and $18,311 of consolidated variable interest entities, respectively)

     16,503        36,894   
                
     3,992,997        3,895,942   

Less accumulated depreciation and amortization (including $5,329 and $4,431 of consolidated variable interest entities, respectively)

     (1,084,806     (1,035,204
                

Net real estate

     2,908,191        2,860,738   

Cash and cash equivalents

     19,848        15,797   

Accounts and notes receivable, net

     73,917        68,997   

Mortgage notes receivable, net

     56,619        44,813   

Investment in real estate partnerships

     57,864        51,606   

Prepaid expenses and other assets

     98,339        110,686   

Debt issuance costs, net of accumulated amortization of $9,467 and $9,075, respectively

     5,890        6,916   
                

TOTAL ASSETS

   $ 3,220,668      $ 3,159,553   
                

LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY

    

Liabilities

    

Mortgages payable (including $22,455 and $22,785 of consolidated variable interest entities, respectively)

   $ 487,001      $ 529,501   

Capital lease obligations

     59,252        59,940   

Notes payable

     209,302        97,881   

Senior notes and debentures

     1,004,737        1,079,827   

Accounts payable and accrued expenses

     86,552        102,574   

Dividends payable

     42,452        41,601   

Security deposits payable

     11,865        11,751   

Other liabilities and deferred credits

     55,611        55,348   
                

Total liabilities

     1,956,772        1,978,423   

Commitments and contingencies (Note 8)

    

Shareholders’ equity

    

Preferred shares, authorized 15,000,000 shares, $.01 par: 5.417% Series 1 Cumulative Convertible Preferred Shares, (stated at liquidation preference $25 per share), 399,896 shares issued and outstanding

     9,997        9,997   

Common shares of beneficial interest, $.01 par, 100,000,000 shares authorized, 62,798,348 and 61,526,418 shares issued and outstanding, respectively

     628        615   

Additional paid-in capital

     1,767,529        1,666,803   

Accumulated dividends in excess of net income

     (545,589     (527,582
                

Total shareholders’ equity of the Trust

     1,232,565        1,149,833   

Noncontrolling interests

     31,331        31,297   
                

Total shareholders’ equity

     1,263,896        1,181,130   
                

TOTAL LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY

   $ 3,220,668      $ 3,159,553   
                

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated statements.

 

4


Table of Contents

Federal Realty Investment Trust

Consolidated Statements of Operations

(Unaudited)

 

     Three Months Ended
June 30,
    Six Months Ended
June 30,
 
     2011     2010     2011     2010  
     (In thousands, except per share data)  

REVENUE

        

Rental income

   $ 132,999      $ 129,636      $ 267,438      $ 260,461   

Other property income

     2,146        2,509        4,236        8,419   

Mortgage interest income

     1,134        1,071        2,255        2,137   
                                

Total revenue

     136,279        133,216        273,929        271,017   
                                

EXPENSES

        

Rental expenses

     25,132        25,511        54,535        55,304   

Real estate taxes

     15,547        14,828        30,954        29,855   

General and administrative

     6,395        6,016        12,446        11,505   

Depreciation and amortization

     31,871        31,020        62,287        59,793   
                                

Total operating expenses

     78,945        77,375        160,222        156,457   
                                

OPERATING INCOME

     57,334        55,841        113,707        114,560   

Other interest income

     20        33        35        215   

Interest expense

     (23,905     (25,418     (48,949     (51,380

Early extinguishment of debt

     —          —          296        (2,801

Income from real estate partnerships

     444        188        767        381   
                                

INCOME FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS

     33,893        30,644        65,856        60,975   

DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS

        

Discontinued operations - income

     509        314        930        537   

Discontinued operations - gain on deconsolidation of VIE

     2,026        —          2,026        —     

Discontinued operations - gain on sale of real estate

     43        1,000        43        1,000   
                                

Results from discontinued operations

     2,578        1,314        2,999        1,537   
                                

INCOME BEFORE GAIN ON SALE OF REAL ESTATE

     36,471        31,958        68,855        62,512   

Gain on sale of real estate

     —          410        —          410   
                                

NET INCOME

     36,471        32,368        68,855        62,922   

Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests

     (1,714     (1,254     (2,912     (2,588
                                

NET INCOME ATTRIBUTABLE TO THE TRUST

     34,757        31,114        65,943        60,334   

Dividends on preferred shares

     (135     (135     (271     (271
                                

NET INCOME AVAILABLE FOR COMMON SHAREHOLDERS

   $ 34,622      $ 30,979      $ 65,672      $ 60,063   
                                

EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE, BASIC

        

Continuing operations

   $ 0.51      $ 0.47      $ 1.01      $ 0.95   

Discontinued operations

     0.04        0.02        0.05        0.02   

Gain on sale of real estate

     —          0.01        —          0.01   
                                
   $ 0.55      $ 0.50      $ 1.06      $ 0.98   
                                

EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE, DILUTED

        

Continuing operations

   $ 0.51      $ 0.47      $ 1.00      $ 0.95   

Discontinued operations

     0.04        0.02        0.05        0.02   

Gain on sale of real estate

     —          0.01        —          0.01   
                                
   $ 0.55      $ 0.50      $ 1.05      $ 0.98   
                                

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated statements.

 

5


Table of Contents

Federal Realty Investment Trust

Consolidated Statement of Shareholders’ Equity

For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2011

(Unaudited)

 

     Shareholders’ Equity of the Trust              
     Preferred Shares      Common Shares      Additional
Paid-in
    Accumulated
Dividends in
Excess of Net
    Noncontrolling
    Total
Shareholders’
 
     Shares      Amount      Shares      Amount      Capital     Income     Interests     Equity  
     (In thousands, except share data)  

BALANCE AT DECEMBER 31, 2010

     399,896       $ 9,997         61,526,418       $ 615       $ 1,666,803      $ (527,582   $ 31,297      $ 1,181,130   

Net income/comprehensive income

     —           —           —           —           —          65,943        2,912        68,855   

Dividends declared to common shareholders

     —           —           —           —           —          (83,679     —          (83,679

Dividends declared to preferred shareholders

     —           —           —           —           —          (271     —          (271

Distributions declared to noncontrolling interests

     —           —           —           —           —          —          (2,403     (2,403

Common shares issued

     —           —           1,085,705         11         90,121        —          —          90,132   

Exercise of stock options

     —           —           82,716         1         5,439        —          —          5,440   

Shares issued under dividend reinvestment plan

     —           —           15,289         —           1,215        —          —          1,215   

Share-based compensation expense, net

     —           —           88,220         1         4,047        —          —          4,048   

Conversion and redemption of OP units

     —           —           —           —           (96     —          (55     (151

Deconsolidation of VIE

     —           —           —           —           —          —          (420     (420
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

BALANCE AT JUNE 30, 2011

     399,896       $ 9,997         62,798,348       $ 628       $ 1,767,529      $ (545,589   $ 31,331      $ 1,263,896   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated statements.

 

6


Table of Contents

Federal Realty Investment Trust

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

(Unaudited)

 

     Six Months Ended
June 30,
 
     2011     2010  
     (In thousands)  

OPERATING ACTIVITIES

  

Net income

   $ 68,855      $ 62,922   

Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities

    

Depreciation and amortization, including discontinued operations

     62,632        60,110   

Gain on sale of real estate

     (43     (1,410

Gain on deconsolidation of VIE

     (2,026     —     

Early extinguishment of debt

     (296     2,801   

Income from real estate partnerships

     (767     (381

Other, net

     1,675        1,018   

Changes in assets and liabilities, net of effects of acquisitions and dispositions

    

(Increase) decrease in accounts receivable

     (2,921     2,418   

Decrease in prepaid expenses and other assets

     10,579        5,645   

Decrease in accounts payable and accrued expenses

     (16,868     (1,835

Decrease in security deposits and other liabilities

     (2,122     (1,943
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net cash provided by operating activities

     118,698        129,345   

INVESTING ACTIVITIES

    

Acquisition of real estate

     (19,196     —     

Capital expenditures - development and redevelopment

     (35,971     (19,063

Capital expenditures - other

     (19,031     (9,850

Proceeds from sale of real estate

     1,497        —     

Investment in real estate partnerships

     (6,947     (16,720

Distribution from real estate partnership in excess of earnings

     511        258   

Leasing costs

     (6,335     (4,712

Repayment (issuance) of mortgage and other notes receivable, net

     8,712        (11,858
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net cash used in investing activities

     (76,760     (61,945

FINANCING ACTIVITIES

    

Net borrowings under revolving credit facility, net of costs

     112,000        (450

Issuance of senior notes, net of costs

     —          148,457   

Purchase and retirement of senior notes

     (75,000     —     

Issuance of mortgages, capital leases and notes payable, net of costs

     —          9,950   

Repayment of mortgages, capital leases and notes payable

     (86,021     (256,403

Issuance of common shares

     96,787        3,489   

Dividends paid to common and preferred shareholders

     (83,098     (81,165

Distributions to noncontrolling interests

     (2,555     (3,110
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net cash used in financing activities

     (37,887     (179,232
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents

     4,051        (111,832

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year

     15,797        135,389   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents at end of period

   $ 19,848      $ 23,557   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated statements.

 

7


Table of Contents

Federal Realty Investment Trust

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

June 30, 2011

(Unaudited)

NOTE 1—BUSINESS AND ORGANIZATION

Federal Realty Investment Trust (the “Trust”) is an equity real estate investment trust (“REIT”) specializing in the ownership, management, and redevelopment of retail and mixed-use properties. Our properties are located primarily in densely populated and affluent communities in strategically selected metropolitan markets in the Mid-Atlantic and Northeast regions of the United States, as well as in California. As of June 30, 2011, we owned or had a majority interest in community and neighborhood shopping centers and mixed-use properties which are operated as 86 predominantly retail real estate projects.

We operate in a manner intended to enable us to qualify as a REIT for federal income tax purposes. A REIT that distributes at least 90% of its taxable income to its shareholders each year and meets certain other conditions is not taxed on that portion of its taxable income which is distributed to its shareholders. Therefore, federal income taxes on our taxable income have been and are generally expected to be immaterial. We are obligated to pay state taxes, generally consisting of franchise or gross receipts taxes in certain states. Such state taxes also have not been material.

NOTE 2—SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Principles of Consolidation

Our consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Trust, its corporate subsidiaries, and all entities in which the Trust has a controlling interest or has been determined to be the primary beneficiary of a variable interest entity (“VIE”). The equity interests of other investors are reflected as noncontrolling interests. All significant intercompany transactions and balances are eliminated in consolidation. We account for our interests in joint ventures, which we do not control or manage, using the equity method of accounting. Certain 2010 amounts have been reclassified to conform to current period presentation.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, referred to as “GAAP,” requires management to make estimates and assumptions that in certain circumstances affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities, and revenues and expenses. These estimates are prepared using management’s best judgment, after considering past, current and expected events and economic conditions. Actual results could differ from these estimates.

Acquisition of Real Estate

Our methodology of allocating the cost of acquisitions to assets acquired and liabilities assumed is based on estimated fair values, replacement cost and appraised values. When we acquire operating real estate properties, the purchase price is allocated to land, building, improvements, intangibles such as in-place leases, and to current assets and liabilities acquired, if any. The value allocated to in-place leases is amortized over the related lease term and reflected as rental income in the statement of operations. We consider qualitative and quantitative factors in evaluating the likelihood of a tenant exercising a below market renewal option and include such renewal options in the calculation of in-place lease value when we consider these to be bargain renewal options. If the value of below market lease intangibles includes renewal option periods, we include such renewal periods in the amortization period utilized. If a tenant vacates its space prior to contractual termination of its lease, the unamortized balance of any in-place lease value is written off to rental income.

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

In May 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU “) 2011-04, “Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820): Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in U.S. GAAP and IFRSs.” The pronouncement was issued to provide a uniform framework for fair value measurements and related disclosures between U.S. GAAP and International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRS”). ASU 2011-04 changes certain fair value measurement principles and enhances the disclosure requirements particularly for level 3 fair value measurements. This pronouncement is effective for us in the first quarter of 2012 and is not expected to have a significant impact to our consolidated financial statements.

In June 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-05, “Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Presentation of Comprehensive Income.” ASU 2011-05 eliminates the option to present components of other comprehensive income as part of the statement of shareholders’ equity and requires the presentation of components of net income and components of other comprehensive

 

8


Table of Contents

income either in a single continuous statement of comprehensive income or in two separate but consecutive statements. This pronouncement is effective for us in the first quarter of 2012 and will not have a significant impact to our consolidated financial statements.

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows—Supplemental Disclosures

The following table provides supplemental disclosures related to the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows:

 

     Six Months Ended June 30,  
     2011     2010  
     (In thousands)  

SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES:

    

Total interest costs incurred

   $ 52,585      $ 54,370   

Interest capitalized

     (3,636     (2,990
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Interest expense

   $ 48,949      $ 51,380   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Cash paid for interest, net of amounts capitalized

   $ 50,197      $ 48,830   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Cash paid for income taxes

   $ 537      $ 86   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

NON-CASH INVESTING AND FINANCING TRANSACTIONS:

    

Mortgage loan assumed with acquisition

   $ 42,938      $ —     

Deconsolidation of VIE

   $ 18,311      $ —     

NOTE 3—REAL ESTATE

On January 19, 2011, we acquired the fee interest in Tower Shops located in Davie, Florida for a net purchase price of $66.1 million which includes the assumption of a mortgage loan with a face amount of $41.0 million and a fair value of approximately $42.9 million. The property contains approximately 372,000 square feet of gross leasable area on 67 acres and is shadow-anchored by Home Depot and Costco. Approximately $1.2 million and $4.4 million of net assets acquired were allocated to other assets for “above market leases” and other liabilities for “below market leases”, respectively. We incurred a total of $0.4 million of acquisition costs of which $0.2 million were incurred in 2011 and are included in “general and administrative expenses” for the six months ended June 30, 2011.

In conjunction with the acquisition, we entered into a reverse Section 1031 like-kind exchange agreement with a third party intermediary which is for a maximum of 180 days and allows us, for tax purposes, to defer gains on sale of other properties identified and sold within this period. Until July 12, 2011, the third party intermediary was the legal owner of the property. However, we control the activities that most significantly impact the property and retain all of the economic benefits and risks associated with the property. Therefore, we have determined we are the primary beneficiary of this VIE and consolidated the property and its operations as of January 19, 2011.

On July 12, 2011, we sold Feasterville Shopping Center located in Feasterville, Pennsylvania for a sales price of $20.0 million. The operations of this property are included in “discontinued operations” in the consolidated statements of operations and included in “assets held for sale/disposal” in our consolidated balance sheets for all periods presented. The sale was completed as a Section 1031 tax deferred exchange transaction with the acquisition of Tower Shops.

NOTE 4—MORTGAGE NOTES RECEIVABLE

Prior to June 30, 2011, we were the lender on a first and second mortgage loan on a shopping center and an adjacent commercial building in Norwalk, Connecticut. Our carrying amount of the loans was approximately $18.3 million. The loans were in default and foreclosure proceedings had been filed, however, we were in negotiations with the borrower to refinance the loans. On June 30, 2011, we refinanced the existing loans with a first mortgage loan which has a principal balance of $11.9 million, bears interest at 6.0%, and matures on June 30, 2014, subject to a one year extension option. The loan is secured by the shopping center in Norwalk, Connecticut. As part of the refinancing, we received approximately $8.7 million in cash.

 

9


Table of Contents

Because the loans were in default, we had certain rights under the first mortgage loan agreement that gave us the ability to direct the activities that most significantly impacted the shopping center. Although we did not exercise those rights, the existence of those rights in the loan agreement resulted in the entity being a VIE. Additionally, given our investment in both the first and second mortgage on the property, the overall decline in fair market value since the loans were initiated, and the default status of the loans, we also had the obligation to absorb losses or rights to receive benefits that could potentially be significant to the VIE. Consequently, we were the primary beneficiary of this VIE and consolidated the shopping center and adjacent building from March 30, 2010 to June 29, 2011. Our investment in the property is included in “assets held for sale/disposal” in the consolidated balance sheet at December 31, 2010 and the operations of the entity are included in “discontinued operations” for all periods presented.

In conjunction with the refinancing of the loans, we re-evaluated our status as the primary beneficiary of the VIE. As the loan is not in default, we no longer have certain rights that give us the ability to control the activities that most significantly impact the shopping center. Our current involvement in the property is solely as the lender on the $11.9 million mortgage loan with protective rights as the lender. Therefore, we are no longer the primary beneficiary and deconsolidated the entity as of June 30, 2011. We recognized a $2.0 million gain on deconsolidation as part of the refinancing which is included in “discontinued operations - gain on deconsolidation of VIE” for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011. The mortgage loan receivable was recorded at its estimated fair value of $11.9 million and is included in “mortgage notes receivable” on the balance sheet at June 30, 2011. The $11.9 million also reflects our maximum exposure to loss related to this investment.

The change in design of the entity including the refinancing of the loan was a VIE reconsideration event. Given that the loan is no longer in default, we, as lender, do not have the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact the entity, and the additional equity investment at risk provided by the entity’s equity holders, the entity is no longer a VIE.

NOTE 5—REAL ESTATE PARTNERSHIPS

Federal/Lion Venture LP

We have a joint venture arrangement (the “Partnership”) with affiliates of a discretionary fund created and advised by ING Clarion Partners (“Clarion”). We own 30% of the equity in the Partnership and Clarion owns 70%. We hold a general partnership interest, however, Clarion also holds a general partnership interest and has substantive participating rights. We cannot make significant decisions without Clarion’s approval. Accordingly, we account for our interest in the Partnership using the equity method. As of June 30, 2011, the Partnership owned seven retail real estate properties. We are the manager of the Partnership and its properties, earning fees for acquisitions, dispositions, management, leasing, and financing. Intercompany profit generated from fees is eliminated in consolidation. We also have the opportunity to receive performance-based earnings through our Partnership interest. Accounting policies for the Partnership are similar to accounting policies followed by the Trust. The Partnership is subject to a buy-sell provision which is customary for real estate joint venture agreements and the industry. Either partner may initiate this provision at any time, which could result in either the sale of our interest or the use of available cash or borrowings to acquire Clarion’s interest.

The following tables provide summarized operating results and the financial position of the Partnership:

 

     Three Months Ended
June 30,
     Six Months Ended
June 30,
 
     2011      2010      2011      2010  
     (In thousands)  

OPERATING RESULTS

           

Revenue

   $ 4,676       $ 4,523       $ 9,644       $ 9,178   

Expenses

           

Other operating expenses

     1,228         1,380         2,984         3,342   

Depreciation and amortization

     1,290         1,244         2,568         2,512   

Interest expense

     848         850         1,696         1,702   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total expenses

     3,366         3,474         7,248         7,556   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Net income

   $ 1,310       $ 1,049       $ 2,396       $ 1,622   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Our share of net income from real estate partnership

   $ 444       $ 353       $ 801       $ 546   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

10


Table of Contents
     June 30,
2011
     December 31,
2010
 
     (In thousands)  

BALANCE SHEETS

     

Real estate, net

   $ 179,481       $ 181,565   

Cash

     3,679         3,054   

Other assets

     6,340         7,336   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total assets

   $ 189,500       $ 191,955   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Mortgages payable

   $ 57,481       $ 57,584   

Other liabilities

     4,829         5,439   

Partners’ capital

     127,190         128,932   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total liabilities and partners’ capital

   $ 189,500       $ 191,955   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Our share of unconsolidated debt

   $ 17,244       $ 17,275   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Our investment in real estate partnership

   $ 34,963       $ 35,504   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Taurus Newbury Street JV II Limited Partnership

In May 2010, we formed Taurus Newbury Street JV II Limited Partnership (“Newbury Street Partnership”), a joint venture limited partnership with an affiliate of Taurus Investment Holdings, LLC (“Taurus”), which plans to acquire, operate and redevelop up to $200 million of properties located primarily in the Back Bay section of Boston, Massachusetts. We hold an 85% limited partnership interest in Newbury Street Partnership and Taurus holds a 15% limited partnership interest and serves as general partner. As general partner, Taurus is responsible for the operation and management of the properties, subject to our approval on major decisions. We have evaluated the entity and determined that it is not a VIE. Accordingly, given Taurus’ role as general partner, we account for our interest in Newbury Street Partnership using the equity method. Accounting policies for the Newbury Street Partnership are similar to accounting policies followed by the Trust. Intercompany profit generated from interest income on loans we have provided to the partnership is eliminated in consolidation. All amounts contributed and advanced to Newbury Street Partnership are included in “Investment in real estate partnerships” in the consolidated balance sheets.

Newbury Street Partnership is subject to a buy-sell provision which is customary for real estate joint venture agreements and the industry. The buy-sell can be exercised only in certain circumstances through May 2014 and may be initiated by either party at anytime thereafter which could result in either the sale of our interest or the use of available cash or borrowings to acquire Taurus’ interest.

On May 26, 2011, Newbury Street Partnership acquired the fee interest in a 6,700 square foot building located on Newbury Street for a purchase price of $6.2 million. We contributed approximately $2.8 million towards the acquisition and provided a $3.1 million interest-only loan secured by the building. This loan and the $8.8 million loan secured by the other two buildings owned by the partnership bear interest at LIBOR plus 400 basis points and mature in May 2012, subject to a one-year extension option. This purchase increases Newbury Street Partnership’s portfolio to three buildings all located on Newbury Street with a total of approximately 39,000 square feet of mixed-use gross leasable area. Our investment in Newbury Street Partnership was $22.9 million and $16.1 million, respectively, at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010.

Due to the timing of receiving financial information from the general partner, our share of operating earnings is recorded one quarter in arrears. Consequently, the following tables provide summarized operating results for the six months ended March 31, 2011, and the financial position of the Newbury Street Partnership as of March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010:

 

OPERATING RESULTS (in thousands)

  

Revenue

   $ 548   

Expenses

  

Other operating expenses

     379   

Depreciation and amortization

     176   

Interest expense

     194   
  

 

 

 

Total expenses

     749   
  

 

 

 

Net loss

   $ (201
  

 

 

 

Our share of net loss from real estate partnership

   $ (34
  

 

 

 

 

11


Table of Contents
     March 31,
2011
     December 31,
2010
 
     (In thousands)  

BALANCE SHEETS

     

Real estate, net

   $ 17,463       $ 17,121   

Cash

     379         264   

Other assets

     365         358   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total assets

   $ 18,207       $ 17,743   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Mortgages payable

   $ 8,750       $ 8,750   

Other liabilities

     816         393   

Partners’ capital

     8,641         8,600   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total liabilities and partners’ capital

   $ 18,207       $ 17,743   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

NOTE 6—DEBT

In connection with the acquisition of Tower Shops on January 19, 2011, we assumed a mortgage loan with a face amount of $41.0 million and a fair value of approximately $42.9 million. The mortgage loan bore interest at 6.52%, had a scheduled maturity in July 2015 and was contractually pre-payable after June 2011 with a 3% prepayment premium. On March 24, 2011, the lender unexpectedly allowed us to repay the $41.0 million mortgage loan prior to the permitted prepayment date including the 3% prepayment premium of $1.2 million. The $0.3 million of income from early extinguishment of debt in the six months ended June 30, 2011, relates to the early payoff of this loan and includes the write-off of the unamortized debt premium of $1.7 million net of the 3% prepayment premium and unamortized debt fees. The mortgage loan was repaid with funds borrowed on our $300.0 million revolving credit facility.

On February 15, 2011, we repaid our $75.0 million 4.50% senior notes on the maturity date using funds borrowed on our $300.0 million revolving credit facility.

On April 29, 2011, we repaid the $31.7 million mortgage loan on Federal Plaza which had an original maturity date of June 1, 2011. This loan was repaid with funds borrowed on our $300.0 million revolving credit facility.

On June 1, 2011, we repaid the $5.6 million mortgage loan on Tysons Station which had an original maturity date of September 1, 2011. This loan was repaid with funds borrowed on our $300.0 million revolving credit facility.

During the three and six months ended June 30, 2011, the maximum amount of borrowings outstanding under our $300.0 million revolving credit facility was $265.0 million for both periods, the weighted average amount of borrowings outstanding was $220.3 million and $186.6 million, respectively, and the weighted average interest rate, before amortization of debt fees, was 0.66% and 0.68%, respectively. At June 30, 2011, there was $189.0 million outstanding on our revolving credit facility.

Our revolving credit facility and certain notes require us to comply with various financial covenants, including the maintenance of minimum shareholders’ equity and debt coverage ratios and a maximum ratio of debt to net worth. As of June 30, 2011, we were in compliance with all loan covenants.

NOTE 7—FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

Except as disclosed below, the carrying amount of our financial instruments approximates their fair value. The fair value of our mortgages payable, notes payable and senior notes and debentures is sensitive to fluctuations in interest rates. Quoted market prices were used to estimate the fair value of our marketable senior notes and debentures and discounted cash flow analysis is generally used to estimate the fair value of our mortgages and notes payable. Considerable judgment is necessary to estimate the fair value of financial instruments. The estimates of fair value presented herein are not necessarily indicative of the amounts that could be realized upon disposition of the financial instruments. A summary of the carrying amount and fair value of our mortgages payable, notes payable and senior notes and debentures is as follows:

 

     June 30, 2011      December 31, 2010  
   Carrying
Value
     Fair Value      Carrying
Value
     Fair Value  
   (In thousands)  

Mortgages and notes payable

   $ 696,303       $ 760,107       $ 627,382       $ 685,552   

Senior notes and debentures

   $ 1,004,737       $ 1,105,001       $ 1,079,827       $ 1,168,679   

 

12


Table of Contents

NOTE 8—COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

We are currently a party to various legal proceedings. Other than as described below, we do not believe that the ultimate outcome of these matters, either individually or in the aggregate, could have a material adverse effect on our financial position or overall trends in results of operations; however, litigation is subject to inherent uncertainties. Also under our leases, tenants are typically obligated to indemnify us from and against all liabilities, costs and expenses imposed upon or asserted against us (1) as owner of the properties due to certain matters relating to the operation of the properties by the tenant, and (2) where appropriate, due to certain matters relating to the ownership of the properties prior to their acquisition by us.

In March 2011, we paid the final judgment of $16.2 million related to a previously disclosed lawsuit regarding a parcel of land located adjacent to Santana Row. The final judgment was previously accrued and is included in “accounts payable and accrued expenses” in our consolidated balance sheet at December 31, 2010.

Under the terms of certain partnership agreements, the partners have the right to exchange their operating partnership units for cash or the same number of our common shares, at our option. A total of 360,314 operating partnership units are outstanding which have a total fair value of $30.7 million, based on our closing stock price on June 30, 2011.

NOTE 9—SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY

The following table provides a summary of dividends declared and paid per share:

 

     Six Months Ended June 30,  
     2011      2010  
     Declared      Paid      Declared      Paid  

Common shares

   $ 1.340       $ 1.340       $ 1.320       $ 1.320   

5.417% Series 1 Cumulative Convertible Preferred

   $ 0.677       $ 0.677       $ 0.677       $ 0.677   

On February 24, 2011, we entered into an at the market (“ATM”) equity program in which we may from time to time offer and sell common shares having an aggregate offering price of up to $300.0 million. We intend to use the net proceeds to fund potential acquisition opportunities, fund our development and redevelopment pipeline, repay amounts outstanding under our revolving credit facility and/or for general corporate purposes. For the three months ended June 30, 2011, we issued 493,022 common shares at a weighted average price per share of $86.93 for net cash proceeds of $42.2 million and paid $0.6 million in commissions related to the sales of these common shares. For the six months ended June 30, 2011, we issued 1,085,611 common shares at a weighted average price per share of $84.48 for net cash proceeds of $90.1 million and paid $1.4 million in commissions related to the sales of these common shares.

NOTE 10—COMPONENTS OF RENTAL INCOME

The principal components of rental income are as follows:

 

     Three Months Ended
June  30,
     Six Months Ended
June  30,
 
     2011      2010      2011      2010  
     (In thousands)  

Minimum rents

           

Retail and commercial

   $ 98,232       $ 94,777       $ 194,968       $ 188,276   

Residential (1)

     5,687         5,357         11,212         10,650   

Cost reimbursement

     25,538         26,089         54,369         54,839   

Percentage rent

     1,530         994         2,925         2,450   

Other

     2,012         2,419         3,964         4,246   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total rental income

   $ 132,999       $ 129,636       $ 267,438       $ 260,461   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

(1) Residential minimum rents consist of the rental amounts for residential units at Rollingwood Apartments, The Crest at Congressional Plaza Apartments, Santana Row and Bethesda Row.

 

13


Table of Contents

Minimum rents include the following:

 

     Three Months Ended
June  30,
    Six Months Ended
June  30,
 
     2011     2010     2011     2010  
     (In millions)  

Straight-line rents

   $ 1.3      $ 1.3      $ 2.3      $ 2.5   

Amortization of above market leases

   $ (0.6   $ (0.5   $ (1.2   $ (1.0

Amortization of below market leases

   $ 1.0      $ 1.0      $ 1.9      $ 1.9   

NOTE 11—DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS

Results of properties disposed or held for disposal which meet certain requirements, constitute discontinued operations and as such, the operations of these properties are classified as discontinued operations for all periods presented. A summary of the financial information for the discontinued operations is as follows:

 

     Three Months Ended
June  30,
     Six Months Ended
June  30,
 
     2011      2010      2011      2010  
     (In millions)  

Revenue from discontinued operations

   $ 1.0       $ 0.6       $ 2.0       $ 1.3   

Income from discontinued operations

   $ 0.5       $ 0.3       $ 0.9       $ 0.5   

NOTE 12—SHARE-BASED COMPENSATION PLANS

A summary of share-based compensation expense included in net income is as follows:

 

     Three Months Ended
June  30,
    Six Months Ended
June 30,
 
     2011     2010     2011     2010  
     (In thousands)  

Share-based compensation incurred

        

Grants of common shares

   $ 1,651      $ 1,198      $ 3,586      $ 2,752   

Grants of options

     208        290        462        562   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 
     1,859        1,488        4,048        3,314   

Capitalized share-based compensation

     (176     (191     (358     (384
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Share-based compensation expense

   $ 1,683      $ 1,297      $ 3,690      $ 2,930   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

NOTE 13—EARNINGS PER SHARE

We have calculated earnings per share (“EPS”) under the two-class method. The two-class method is an earnings allocation methodology whereby EPS for each class of common stock and participating securities is calculated according to dividends declared and participation rights in undistributed earnings. We had 0.3 million weighted average unvested shares outstanding for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 and 0.2 million weighted average unvested shares outstanding for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010 which are considered participating securities. Therefore, we have allocated our earnings for basic and diluted EPS between common shares and unvested shares; the portion of earnings allocated to the unvested shares is reflected as “earnings allocated to unvested shares” in the reconciliation below.

In the dilutive EPS calculation, dilutive stock options were calculated using the treasury stock method consistent with prior periods; stock options of 0.1 million and 0.3 million for the three months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively, and stock options of 0.1 million and 0.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively, have been excluded as they were anti-dilutive. The conversions of downREIT operating partnership units and 5.417% Series 1 Cumulative Convertible Preferred Shares are anti-dilutive for all periods presented and accordingly, have been excluded from the weighted average common shares used to compute diluted EPS.

 

14


Table of Contents
     Three Months Ended
June  30,
    Six Months Ended
June 30,
 
     2011     2010     2011     2010  
     (In thousands, except per share data)  

NUMERATOR

        

Income from continuing operations

   $ 33,893      $ 30,644      $ 65,856      $ 60,975   

Less: Preferred share dividends

     (135     (135     (271     (271

Less: Income from continuing operations attributable to noncontrolling interests

     (1,504     (1,254     (2,692     (2,588

Less: Earnings allocated to unvested shares

     (125     (133     (316     (267
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Income from continuing operations available for common shareholders

     32,129        29,122        62,577        57,849   

Results from discontinued operations attributable to the Trust

     2,368        1,314        2,779        1,537   

Gain on sale of real estate

     —          410        —          410   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net income available for common shareholders, basic and diluted

   $ 34,497      $ 30,846      $ 65,356      $ 59,796   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

DENOMINATOR

        

Weighted average common shares outstanding—basic

     62,214        61,169        61,844        61,129   

Effect of dilutive securities:

        

Stock options

     177        142        168        137   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Weighted average common shares outstanding—diluted

     62,391        61,311        62,012        61,266   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE, BASIC

        

Continuing operations

   $ 0.51      $ 0.47      $ 1.01      $ 0.95   

Discontinued operations

     0.04        0.02        0.05        0.02   

Gain on sale of real estate

     —          0.01        —          0.01   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 
   $ 0.55      $ 0.50      $ 1.06      $ 0.98   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE, DILUTED

        

Continuing operations

   $ 0.51      $ 0.47      $ 1.00      $ 0.95   

Discontinued operations

     0.04        0.02        0.05        0.02   

Gain on sale of real estate

     —          0.01        —          0.01   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 
   $ 0.55      $ 0.50      $ 1.05      $ 0.98   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Income from continuing operations attributable to the Trust

   $ 32,389      $ 29,390      $ 63,164      $ 58,387   

NOTE 14—SUBSEQUENT EVENT

On July 7, 2011, we replaced our existing $300.0 million revolving credit facility with a new $400.0 million unsecured revolving credit facility. This new revolving credit facility matures on July 6, 2015, subject to a one-year extension at our option, and bears interest at LIBOR plus 115 basis points. The spread over LIBOR is subject to adjustment based on our credit rating.

 

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Forward-Looking Statements

The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the consolidated interim financial statements and notes thereto appearing in Item 1 of this report and the more detailed information contained in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) on February 15, 2011.

This Form 10-Q contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. When we refer to forward-looking statements or information, sometimes we use words such as “may,” “will,” “could,” “should,” “plans,” “intends,” “expects,” “believes,” “estimates,” “anticipates” and “continues.” Forward-looking statements are not historical facts or guarantees of future performance and involve certain known and unknown risks, uncertainties, and other factors, many of which are outside our control, that could cause actual results to differ materially from those we describe.

Given these uncertainties, readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on any forward-looking statements that we make, including those in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. Except as may be required by law, we make no promise to update any

 

15


Table of Contents

of the forward-looking statements as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. You should carefully review the risks and the risk factors included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 and under Part II, Item 1A in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, before making any investments in us.

Overview

We are an equity real estate investment trust (“REIT”) specializing in the ownership, management, and redevelopment of high quality retail and mixed-use properties located primarily in densely populated and affluent communities in strategically selected metropolitan markets in the Northeast and Mid-Atlantic regions of the United States, as well as in California. As of June 30, 2011, we owned or had a majority interest in community and neighborhood shopping centers and mixed-use properties which are operated as 86 predominantly retail real estate projects comprising approximately 18.6 million square feet. In total, the real estate projects were 93.4% leased and 92.7% occupied at June 30, 2011. A joint venture in which we own a 30% interest owned seven retail real estate projects totaling approximately 1.0 million square feet as of June 30, 2011. In total, the joint venture properties in which we own a 30% interest were 90.8% leased and 90.2% occupied at June 30, 2011.

2011 Significant Property Acquisition and Dispositions

On January 19, 2011, we acquired the fee interest in Tower Shops located in Davie, Florida for a net purchase price of $66.1 million which includes the assumption of a mortgage loan with a face amount of $41.0 million and a fair value of approximately $42.9 million. The property contains approximately 372,000 square feet of gross leasable area on 67 acres and is shadow-anchored by Home Depot and Costco. Approximately $1.2 million and $4.4 million of net assets acquired were allocated to other assets for “above market leases” and other liabilities for “below market leases”, respectively. We incurred a total of $0.4 million of acquisition costs of which $0.2 million were incurred in 2011 and are included in “general and administrative expenses” for the six months ended June 30, 2011.

In conjunction with the acquisition, we entered into a reverse Section 1031 like-kind exchange agreement with a third party intermediary which is for a maximum of 180 days and allows us, for tax purposes, to defer gains on sale of other properties identified and sold within this period. Until July 12, 2011, the third party intermediary was the legal owner of the property. However, we control the activities that most significantly impact the property and retain all of the economic benefits and risks associated with the property. Therefore, we have determined we are the primary beneficiary of this VIE and consolidated the property and its operations as of January 19, 2011.

On May 26, 2011, Newbury Street Partnership acquired the fee interest in a 6,700 square foot building located on Newbury Street in Boston, Massachusetts, for a purchase price of $6.2 million. We contributed approximately $2.8 million towards the acquisition and provided a $3.1 million interest-only loan secured by the building. The loan bears interest at LIBOR plus 400 basis points and matures in May 2012, subject to a one-year extension option. This purchase increases Newbury Street Partnership’s portfolio to three buildings all located on Newbury Street with a total of approximately 39,000 square feet of mixed-use gross leasable area.

On July 12, 2011, we sold Feasterville Shopping Center located in Feasterville, Pennsylvania for a sales price of $20.0 million. The operations of this property are included in “discontinued operations” in the consolidated statements of operations and included in “assets held for sale/disposal” in our consolidated balance sheets for all periods presented. The sale was completed as a Section 1031 tax deferred exchange transaction with the acquisition of Tower Shops.

2011 Significant Debt, Equity and Other Transactions

In connection with the acquisition of Tower Shops on January 19, 2011, we assumed a mortgage loan with a face amount of $41.0 million and a fair value of approximately $42.9 million. The mortgage loan bore interest at 6.52%, had a scheduled maturity in July 2015 and was contractually pre-payable after June 2011 with a 3% prepayment premium. On March 24, 2011, the lender unexpectedly allowed us to repay the $41.0 million mortgage loan prior to the permitted prepayment date including the 3% prepayment premium of $1.2 million. The $0.3 million of income from early extinguishment of debt in the six months ended June 30, 2011, relates to the early payoff of this loan and includes the write-off of the unamortized debt premium of $1.7 million net of the 3% prepayment premium and unamortized debt fees. The mortgage loan was repaid with funds borrowed on our $300.0 million revolving credit facility.

 

16


Table of Contents

On February 15, 2011, we repaid our $75.0 million 4.50% senior notes on the maturity date using funds borrowed on our $300.0 million revolving credit facility.

On February 24, 2011, we entered into an at the market (“ATM”) equity program in which we may from time to time offer and sell common shares having an aggregate offering price of up to $300.0 million. We intend to use the net proceeds to fund potential acquisition opportunities, fund our development and redevelopment pipeline, repay amounts outstanding under our revolving credit facility and/or for general corporate purposes. For the three months ended June 30, 2011, we issued 493,022 common shares at a weighted average price per share of $86.93 for net cash proceeds of $42.2 million and paid $0.6 million in commissions related to the sales of these common shares. For the six months ended June 30, 2011, we issued 1,085,611 common shares at a weighted average price per share of $84.48 for net cash proceeds of $90.1 million and paid $1.4 million in commissions related to the sales of these common shares.

In March 2011, we paid the final judgment of $16.2 million related to a previously disclosed lawsuit regarding a parcel of land located adjacent to Santana Row. The final judgment was previously accrued and is included in “accounts payable and accrued expenses” in our consolidated balance sheet at December 31, 2010.

On April 29, 2011, we repaid the $31.7 million mortgage loan on Federal Plaza which had an original maturity date of June 1, 2011. This loan was repaid with funds borrowed on our $300.0 million revolving credit facility.

On June 1, 2011, we repaid the $5.6 million mortgage loan on Tysons Station which had an original maturity date of September 1, 2011. This loan was repaid with funds borrowed on our $300.0 million revolving credit facility.

On July 7, 2011, we replaced our existing $300.0 million revolving credit facility with a new $400.0 million unsecured revolving credit facility. This new revolving credit facility matures on July 6, 2015, subject to a one-year extension at our option, and bears interest at LIBOR plus 115 basis points. The spread over LIBOR is subject to adjustment based on our credit rating.

Mortgage Loan Receivable Refinancing

Prior to June 30, 2011, we were the lender on a first and second mortgage loan on a shopping center and an adjacent commercial building in Norwalk, Connecticut. Our carrying amount of the loans was approximately $18.3 million. The loans were in default and foreclosure proceedings had been filed, however, we were in negotiations with the borrower to refinance the loans. On June 30, 2011, we refinanced the existing loans with a first mortgage loan which has a principal balance of $11.9 million, bears interest at 6.0%, and matures on June 30, 2014, subject to a one year extension option. The loan is secured by the shopping center in Norwalk, Connecticut. As part of the refinancing, we received approximately $8.7 million in cash.

Because the loans were in default, we had certain rights under the first mortgage loan agreement that gave us the ability to direct the activities that most significantly impacted the shopping center. Although we did not exercise those rights, the existence of those rights in the loan agreement resulted in the entity being a VIE. Additionally, given our investment in both the first and second mortgage on the property, the overall decline in fair market value since the loans were initiated, and the default status of the loans, we also had the obligation to absorb losses or rights to receive benefits that could potentially be significant to the VIE. Consequently, we were the primary beneficiary of this VIE and consolidated the shopping center and adjacent building from March 30, 2010 to June 29, 2011. Our investment in the property is included in “assets held for sale/disposal” in the consolidated balance sheet at December 31, 2010 and the operations of the entity are included in “discontinued operations” for all periods presented.

In conjunction with the refinancing of the loans, we re-evaluated our status as the primary beneficiary of the VIE. As the loan is not in default, we no longer have certain rights that give us the ability to control the activities that most significantly impact the shopping center. Our current involvement in the property is solely as the lender on the $11.9 million mortgage loan with protective rights as the lender. Therefore, we are no longer the primary beneficiary and deconsolidated the entity as of June 30, 2011. We recognized a $2.0 million gain on deconsolidation as part of the refinancing which is included in “discontinued operations - gain on deconsolidation of VIE” for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011. The mortgage loan receivable was recorded at its estimated fair value of $11.9 million and is included in “mortgage notes receivable” on the balance sheet at June 30, 2011. The $11.9 million also reflects our maximum exposure to loss related to this investment.

The change in design of the entity including the refinancing of the loan was a VIE reconsideration event. Given that the loan is no longer in default, we, as lender, do not have the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact the entity, and the additional equity investment at risk provided by the entity’s equity holders, the entity is no longer a VIE.

 

17


Table of Contents

Capitalized Costs

We capitalized external and internal costs related to both development and redevelopment activities of $33 million and $2 million, respectively, for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and $22 million and $2 million, respectively, for the six months ended June 30, 2010. We capitalized external and internal costs related to other property improvements of $20 million and $1 million, respectively, for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and $9 million and $1 million, respectively, for the six months ended June 30, 2010. We capitalized external and internal costs related to leasing activities of $4 million and $2 million, respectively, for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and $3 million and $2 million, respectively, for the six months ended June 30, 2010. The amount of capitalized internal costs for salaries and related benefits for development and redevelopment activities, other property improvements, and leasing activities were $1 million, less than $1 million, and $2 million, respectively, for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and $1 million, less than $1 million, and $2 million, respectively, for the six months ended June 30, 2010.

Outlook

We seek growth in earnings, funds from operations, and cash flows primarily through a combination of the following:

 

   

growth in our portfolio from property redevelopments,

 

   

expansion of our portfolio through property acquisitions, and

 

   

growth in our same-center portfolio.

Our properties are located in densely populated or affluent areas with high barriers to entry which allow us to take advantage of redevelopment opportunities that enhance our operating performance through renovation, expansion, reconfiguration, and/or retenanting. We evaluate our properties on an ongoing basis to identify these types of opportunities. In 2011 and 2012, we expect to have redevelopment projects stabilizing with projected costs of approximately $47 million and $59 million, respectively.

Additionally, we continue to invest in the development at Assembly Row which is a long-term development project we expect to be involved in over the coming years. The carrying value of the development portion of this project at June 30, 2011 is approximately $121 million. The project currently has zoning entitlements to build 2.3 million square feet of commercial-use buildings, 2,100 residential units, and a 200 room hotel. We expect that we will structure any future development in a manner designed to mitigate our risk which may include transfers of entitlements or co-developing with other companies. We have entered into a preliminary agreement with a residential developer for the first phase of development and continue our current predevelopment work and infrastructure work. We expect to invest between $20 million and $40 million related to the development in 2011. However, we do not intend to move forward with construction of the first phase of the project until the Massachusetts Bay Transit Authority (“MBTA”) has received qualified bids from contractors showing that a new orange line T-stop can be built at the property for no more than the public and private funding that has been committed for this T-stop and the contingencies to releasing those funds have been satisfied. If the MBTA does not receive qualified bids demonstrating that the T-stop can be built for the amount committed for construction or the contingencies to releasing those funds are not satisfied, it is unlikely we would commence construction and be able to recover our basis in the property and as a result, would be required to record an impairment.

We continue to review acquisition opportunities in our primary markets that complement our portfolio and provide long-term opportunities. Generally, our acquisitions do not initially contribute significantly to earnings growth; however, they provide long-term re-leasing growth, redevelopment opportunities, and other strategic opportunities. Any growth from acquisitions is contingent on our ability to find properties that meet our qualitative standards at prices that meet our financial hurdles. Changes in interest rates may affect our success in achieving earnings growth through acquisitions by affecting both the price that must be paid to acquire a property, as well as our ability to economically finance the property acquisition. Generally, our acquisitions are initially financed by available cash and/or borrowings under our revolving credit facility which may be repaid later with funds raised through the issuance of new equity or new long-term debt. On occasion we also finance our acquisitions through the issuance of common shares, preferred shares, or downREIT units as well as through assumed mortgages.

Our same-center growth is primarily driven by increases in rental rates on new leases and lease renewals and changes in portfolio occupancy. Over the long-term, the infill nature and strong demographics of our properties provide a strategic advantage allowing us to maintain relatively high occupancy and increase rental rates. The current economic environment may, however, impact our ability to increase rental rates in the short-term and may require us to decrease some rental rates. This will have a long-term impact over the contractual term of the lease agreement, which on average is between five and ten years. We expect to continue to see small changes in occupancy over the short term and expect increases in occupancy to be a driver of our same-center growth over the long term as we are able to re-lease vacant spaces. We seek to maintain a mix of strong national, regional, and local retailers. At June 30, 2011, no single tenant accounted for more than 2.6% of annualized base rent.

 

18


Table of Contents

The current economic environment has impacted the success of our tenants’ retail operations and therefore the amount of rent and expense reimbursements we receive from our tenants. While we believe the locations of our centers and diverse tenant base mitigates the negative impact of the economic environment, any reduction in our tenants’ abilities to pay base rent, percentage rent or other charges, will adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations. We expect our occupancy rate will decrease in the short term as we seek to re-lease approximately 103,000 square feet of space that became vacant in April 2011 due to the rejection of three leases by Borders Group and the rejection of five leases by Blockbuster in their respective bankruptcy proceedings. Additionally, Borders Group recently announced the closing of their remaining stores in late 2011 which includes our remaining Borders location totaling approximately 27,000 square feet. We are currently working to re-lease the spaces but expect the leasing and final occupancy of the spaces to take several quarters. Since the latter part of 2010, we have seen signs of improvement for some of our tenants as well as increased interest from prospective tenants for our retail spaces; however, there can be no assurance that these positive signs will continue. We continue to monitor our tenants’ operating performances as well as trends in the retail industry to evaluate any future impact.

At June 30, 2011, the leasable square feet in our properties was 92.7% occupied and 93.4% leased. The leased rate is higher than the occupied rate due to leased spaces that are being redeveloped or improved or that are awaiting permits and, therefore, are not yet ready to be occupied. Our occupancy and leased rates are subject to variability over time due to factors including acquisitions, the timing of the start and stabilization of our redevelopment projects, lease expirations and tenant bankruptcies.

Lease Rollovers

In second quarter 2011, we signed leases for a total of 396,000 square feet of retail space including 370,000 square feet of comparable space leases (leases for which there was a prior tenant) at an average rental increase of 6% on a cash basis and 16% on a straight-line basis. New leases for comparable spaces were signed for 136,000 square feet at an average rental increase of 12% on a cash basis and 18% on a straight-line basis. Renewals for comparable spaces were signed for 234,000 square feet at an average rental increase of 3% on a cash basis and 15% on a straight-line basis.

For the six months ended June 30, 2011, we signed leases for a total of 777,000 square feet of retail space including 709,000 square feet of comparable space leases (leases for which there was a prior tenant) at an average rental increase of 8% on a cash basis and 20% on a straight-line basis. New leases for comparable spaces were signed for 281,000 square feet at an average rental increase of 16% on a cash basis and 26% on a straight-line basis. Renewals for comparable spaces were signed for 428,000 square feet at an average rental increase of 4% on a cash basis and 16% on a straight-line basis.

The rental increases associated with comparable spaces generally include all leases signed in arms-length transactions reflecting market leverage between landlords and tenants during the period. The comparison between average rent for expiring leases and new leases is determined by including minimum rent and percentage rent paid on the expiring lease and minimum rent and in some instances, projections of first lease year percentage rent, to be paid on the new lease. In some instances, management exercises judgment as to how to most effectively reflect the comparability of spaces reported in this calculation. The change in rental income on comparable space leases is impacted by numerous factors including current market rates, location, individual tenant creditworthiness, use of space, market conditions when the expiring lease was signed, capital investment made in the space and the specific lease structure.

The leases signed in second quarter 2011 generally become effective over the following two years though some may not become effective until 2014 and beyond. Further, there is risk that some new tenants will not ultimately take possession of their space and that tenants for both new and renewal leases may not pay all of their contractual rent due to operating, financing or other matters. However, these increases do provide information about the tenant/landlord relationship and the potential increase we may achieve in rental income over time.

In 2011, we expect a similar level of leasing activity compared to prior years with overall positive increases in rental income. However, changes in rental income associated with individual signed leases on comparable spaces may be positive or negative, and we can provide no assurance that the rents on new leases will continue to increase at the above disclosed levels, if at all.

 

19


Table of Contents

Same-Center

Throughout this section, we have provided certain information on a “same-center” basis. Information provided on a same-center basis includes the results of properties that we owned and operated for the entirety of both periods being compared except for properties for which significant redevelopment or expansion occurred during either of the periods being compared and properties classified as discontinued operations.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS—THREE MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2011 AND 2010

 

                 Change  
     2011     2010     Dollars     %  
     (Dollar amounts in thousands)  

Rental income

   $ 132,999      $ 129,636      $ 3,363        2.6

Other property income

     2,146        2,509        (363     -14.5

Mortgage interest income

     1,134        1,071        63        5.9
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

Total property revenue

     136,279        133,216        3,063        2.3
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

Rental expenses

     25,132        25,511        (379     -1.5

Real estate taxes

     15,547        14,828        719        4.8
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

Total property expenses

     40,679        40,339        340        0.8
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

Property operating income

     95,600        92,877        2,723        2.9

Other interest income

     20        33        (13     -39.4

Income from real estate partnerships

     444        188        256        136.2

Interest expense

     (23,905     (25,418     1,513        -6.0

General and administrative expense

     (6,395     (6,016     (379     6.3

Depreciation and amortization

     (31,871     (31,020     (851     2.7
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

Total other, net

     (61,707     (62,233     526        -0.8
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

Income from continuing operations

     33,893        30,644        3,249        10.6

Discontinued operations - income

     509        314        195        62.1

Discontinued operations – gain on deconsolidation of VIE

     2,026        —          2,026        100.0

Discontinued operations - gain on sale of real estate

     43        1,000        (957     -95.7

Gain on sale of real estate

     —          410        (410     -100.0
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

Net income

     36,471        32,368        4,103        12.7

Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests

     (1,714     (1,254     (460     36.7
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

Net income attributable to the Trust

   $ 34,757      $ 31,114      $ 3,643        11.7
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

Property Revenues

Total property revenue increased $3.1 million, or 2.3%, to $136.3 million in the three months ended June 30, 2011 compared to $133.2 million in the three months ended June 30, 2010. The percentage occupied at our shopping centers decreased to 92.7% for June 30, 2011 compared to 93.4% for June 30, 2010. Changes in the components of property revenue are discussed below.

Rental Income

Rental income consists primarily of minimum rent, cost reimbursements from tenants and percentage rent. Rental income increased $3.4 million, or 2.6%, to $133.0 million in the three months ended June 30, 2011 compared to $129.6 million in the three months ended June 30, 2010 due primarily to the following:

 

   

an increase of $2.1 million attributable to properties acquired in 2010 and 2011, and

 

   

an increase of $1.2 million at redevelopment properties due primarily to increased occupancy and rental rates on new leases.

 

20


Table of Contents

Other Property Income

Other property income decreased $0.4 million, or 14.5%, to $2.1 million in the three months ended June 30, 2011 compared to $2.5 million in the three months ended June 30, 2010. Included in other property income are items which, although recurring, tend to fluctuate more than rental income from period to period, such as lease termination fees. This decrease is primarily due to a decrease in lease termination fees at same-center properties.

Property Expenses

Total property expenses increased $0.3 million, or 0.8%, to $40.7 million in the three months ended June 30, 2011 compared to $40.3 million in the three months ended June 30, 2010. Changes in the components of property expenses are discussed below.

Rental Expenses

Rental expenses decreased $0.4 million, or 1.5%, to $25.1 million in the three months ended June 30, 2011 compared to $25.5 million in the three months ended June 30, 2010. This decrease is primarily due to the following:

 

   

a decrease of $1.5 million in bad debt expense at same-center and redevelopment properties, and

 

   

a decrease of $0.6 million in ground rent due to the fourth quarter 2010 purchases of the fee interest in the land under Pentagon Row and a portion of Bethesda Row,

partially offset by

 

   

an increase of $0.5 million in marketing expense primarily due to our Assembly Row project and other redevelopment properties,

 

   

an increase of $0.5 million in other operating costs at same-center and redevelopment properties primarily due to higher demolition costs, and

 

   

an increase of $0.4 million related to properties acquired in 2010 and 2011.

As a result of the changes in rental income, other property income and rental expenses as discussed above, rental expenses as a percentage of rental income plus other property income decreased to 18.6% in the three months ended June 30, 2011 from 19.3% in the three months ended June 30, 2010.

Real Estate Taxes

Real estate tax expense increased $0.7 million, or 4.8% to $15.5 million in the three months ended June 30, 2011 compared to $14.8 million in the three months ended June 30, 2010 due primarily to properties acquired in 2010 and 2011 and higher assessments at same-center properties.

Property Operating Income

Property operating income increased $2.7 million, or 2.9%, to $95.6 million in the three months ended June 30, 2011 compared to $92.9 million in the three months ended June 30, 2010. This increase is primarily due to properties acquired in 2010 and 2011 and growth in earnings at same-center properties.

Other

Interest Expense

Interest expense decreased $1.5 million, or 6.0%, to $23.9 million in the three months ended June 30, 2011 compared to $25.4 million in the three months ended June 30, 2010. This decrease is due primarily to the following:

 

   

a decrease of $2.8 million due to a lower overall weighted average borrowing rate, and

 

   

an increase of $0.4 million in capitalized interest,

partially offset by

 

   

an increase of $1.7 million due to higher borrowings.

Gross interest costs were $25.8 million and $26.9 million in the three months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. Capitalized interest was $1.9 million and $1.5 million in the three months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively.

 

21


Table of Contents

General and Administrative Expense

General and administrative expense increased $0.4 million, or 6.3%, to $6.4 million in the three months ended June 30, 2011 from $6.0 million in the three months ended June 30, 2010. This increase is due primarily to higher personnel related costs, higher acquisition costs as a result of expensing all transaction costs on higher acquisitions volume partially offset by lower legal fees primarily as a result of litigation regarding certain rights to acquire the land under Pentagon Row which was fully resolved in fourth quarter 2010.

Depreciation and Amortization

Depreciation and amortization expense increased $0.9 million, or 2.7%, to $31.9 million in the three months ended June 30, 2011 from $31.0 million in the three months ended June 30, 2010. This increase is due primarily to 2010 and 2011 acquisitions, accelerated depreciation due to the change in use of certain redevelopment buildings, and capital improvements at same-center and redevelopment properties.

Discontinued Operations— Income

Income from discontinued operations represents the operating income of properties that have been disposed or will be disposed, which is required to be reported separately from results of ongoing operations. The reported operating income of $0.5 million and $0.3 million for the three months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively, primarily represents the operating income for the period during which we owned properties sold/disposed of or held for sale in 2011 and 2010.

Discontinued Operations— Gain on Deconsolidation of VIE

The $2.0 million gain on deconsolidation of VIE for the three months ended June 30, 2011, is the result of the refinancing of a mortgage note receivable on a shopping center in Norwalk, Connecticut, resulting in us no longer being the primary beneficiary of the VIE. See Note 4 to the consolidated financial statements for further discussion of this transaction.

Discontinued Operations—Gain on Sale of Real Estate

The $1.0 million gain on sale of real estate from discontinued operations for the three months ended June 30, 2010 relates to the final settlement reached with the contractors responsible for performing defective work in previous years related to the work done in connection with the sale of certain condominium units at Santana Row.

Gain on Sale of Real Estate

The $0.4 million gain on sale of real estate for the three months ended June 30, 2010 is due to condemnation proceeds, net of costs, at one of our Northern Virginia properties in order to expand a local road.

 

22


Table of Contents

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS—SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2011 AND 2010

 

                 Change  
     2011     2010     Dollars     %  
     (Dollar amounts in thousands)  

Rental income

   $ 267,438      $ 260,461      $ 6,977        2.7

Other property income

     4,236        8,419        (4,183     -49.7

Mortgage interest income

     2,255        2,137        118        5.5
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

Total property revenue

     273,929        271,017        2,912        1.1
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

Rental expenses

     54,535        55,304        (769     -1.4

Real estate taxes

     30,954        29,855        1,099        3.7
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

Total property expenses

     85,489        85,159        330        0.4
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

Property operating income

     188,440        185,858        2,582        1.4

Other interest income

     35        215        (180     -83.7

Income from real estate partnerships

     767        381        386        101.3

Interest expense

     (48,949     (51,380     2,431        -4.7

Early extinguishment of debt

     296        (2,801     3,097        -110.6

General and administrative expense

     (12,446     (11,505     (941     8.2

Depreciation and amortization

     (62,287     (59,793     (2,494     4.2
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

Total other, net

     (122,584     (124,883     2,299        -1.8
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

Income from continuing operations

     65,856        60,975        4,881        8.0

Discontinued operations - income

     930        537        393        73.2

Discontinued operations - gain on deconsolidation of VIE

     2,026        —          2,026        100.0

Discontinued operations - gain on sale of real estate

     43        1,000        (957     -95.7

Gain on sale of real estate

     —          410        (410     -100.0
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

Net income

     68,855        62,922        5,933        9.4

Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests

     (2,912     (2,588     (324     12.5
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

Net income attributable to the Trust

   $ 65,943      $ 60,334      $ 5,609        9.3
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

Property Revenues

Total property revenue increased $2.9 million, or 1.1%, to $273.9 million in the six months ended June 30, 2011 compared to $271.0 million in the six months ended June 30, 2010. The percentage occupied at our shopping centers decreased to 92.7% for June 30, 2011 compared to 93.4% for June 30, 2010. Changes in the components of property revenue are discussed below.

Rental Income

Rental income consists primarily of minimum rent, cost reimbursements from tenants and percentage rent. Rental income increased $7.0 million, or 2.7%, to $267.4 million in the six months ended June 30, 2011 compared to $260.5 million in the six months ended June 30, 2010 due primarily to the following:

 

   

an increase of $4.0 million attributable to properties acquired in 2010 and 2011,

 

   

an increase of $2.2 million at redevelopment properties due primarily to increased occupancy and rental rates on new leases, and

 

   

an increase of $0.8 million at same-center properties due primarily to higher rental rates on new and renewal leases partially offset by lower recoveries.

Other Property Income

Other property income decreased $4.2 million, or 49.7%, to $4.2 million in the six months ended June 30, 2011 compared to $8.4 million in the six months ended June 30, 2010. Included in other property income are items which, although recurring, tend to fluctuate more than rental income from period to period, such as lease termination fees. This decrease is primarily due to a decrease in lease termination fees at same-center and redevelopment properties.

 

23


Table of Contents

Property Expenses

Total property expenses increased $0.3 million, or 0.4%, to $85.5 million in the six months ended June 30, 2011 compared to $85.2 million in the six months ended June 30, 2010. Changes in the components of property expenses are discussed below.

Rental Expenses

Rental expenses decreased $0.8 million, or 1.4%, to $54.5 million in the six months ended June 30, 2011 compared to $55.3 million in the six months ended June 30, 2010. This decrease is primarily due to the following:

 

   

a decrease of $2.1 million in bad debt expense at same-center and redevelopment properties, and

 

   

a decrease of $1.2 million in ground rent due to the fourth quarter 2010 purchases of the fee interest in the land under Pentagon Row and a portion of Bethesda Row,

partially offset by

 

   

an increase of $1.0 million in marketing expense primarily due to our Assembly Row project and other redevelopment properties,

 

   

an increase of $0.9 million related to properties acquired in 2010 and 2011, and

 

   

an increase of $0.8 million in other operating costs at same-center and redevelopment properties primarily due to higher legal and demolition costs.

As a result of the changes in rental income, other property income and rental expenses as discussed above, rental expenses as a percentage of rental income plus other property income decreased to 20.1% in the six months ended June 30, 2011 from 20.6% in the six months ended June 30, 2010.

Real Estate Taxes

Real estate tax expense increased $1.1 million, or 3.7% to $31.0 million in the six months ended June 30, 2011 compared to $29.9 million in the six months ended June 30, 2010 due primarily to properties acquired in 2010 and 2011 and higher assessments at same-center and redevelopment properties.

Property Operating Income

Property operating income increased $2.6 million, or 1.4%, to $188.4 million in the six months ended June 30, 2011 compared to $185.9 million in the six months ended June 30, 2010. This increase is primarily due to growth in earnings at same-center properties and properties acquired in 2010 and 2011 partially offset by a decrease in lease termination fees at redevelopment properties.

Other

Interest Expense

Interest expense decreased $2.4 million, or 4.7%, to $48.9 million in the six months ended June 30, 2011 compared to $51.4 million in the six months ended June 30, 2010. This decrease is due primarily to the following:

 

   

a decrease of $4.7 million due to a lower overall weighted average borrowing rate, and

 

   

an increase of $0.6 million in capitalized interest,

partially offset by

 

   

an increase of $2.9 million due to higher borrowings.

Gross interest costs were $52.6 million and $54.4 million in the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. Capitalized interest was $3.6 million and $3.0 million in the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively.

Early Extinguishment of Debt

The $0.3 million of income from early extinguishment of debt in the six months ended June 30, 2011 is due to the write-off of unamortized debt premium net of a 3% prepayment premium and unamortized debt fees related to the payoff of our mortgage loan on Tower Shops prior to its contractual prepayment date. The $2.8 million early extinguishment of debt expense in the six months ended June 30, 2010 is due to the write-off of unamortized debt fees related to the $250.0 million payoff of the term loan prior to its maturity date.

 

24


Table of Contents

General and Administrative Expense

General and administrative expense increased $0.9 million, or 8.2%, to $12.4 million in the six months ended June 30, 2011 from $11.5 million in the six months ended June 30, 2010. This increase is due primarily to higher personnel related costs, higher acquisition costs as a result of expensing all transaction costs on higher acquisitions volume partially offset by lower legal fees primarily as a result of litigation regarding certain rights to acquire the land under Pentagon Row which was fully resolved in fourth quarter 2010.

Depreciation and Amortization

Depreciation and amortization expense increased $2.5 million, or 4.2%, to $62.3 million in the six months ended June 30, 2011 from $59.8 million in the six months ended June 30, 2010. This increase is due primarily to 2010 and 2011 acquisitions, accelerated depreciation due to the change in use of certain redevelopment buildings, and capital improvements at same-center and redevelopment properties.

Discontinued Operations— Income

Income from discontinued operations represents the operating income of properties that have been disposed or will be disposed, which is required to be reported separately from results of ongoing operations. The reported operating income of $0.9 million and $0.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively, primarily represents the operating income for the period during which we owned properties sold/disposed of or held for sale in 2011 and 2010.

Discontinued Operations— Gain on Deconsolidation of VIE

The $2.0 million gain on deconsolidation of VIE for the six months ended June 30, 2011, is the result of the refinancing of a mortgage note receivable on a shopping center in Norwalk, Connecticut, resulting in us no longer being the primary beneficiary of the VIE. See Note 4 to the consolidated financial statements for further discussion of this transaction.

Discontinued Operations—Gain on Sale of Real Estate

The $1.0 million gain on sale of real estate from discontinued operations for the six months ended June 30, 2010 relates to the final settlement reached with the contractors responsible for performing defective work in previous years related to the work done in connection with the sale of certain condominium units at Santana Row.

Gain on Sale of Real Estate

The $0.4 million gain on sale of real estate for the six months ended June 30, 2010 is due to condemnation proceeds, net of costs, at one of our Northern Virginia properties in order to expand a local road.

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

In May 2011, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU “) 2011-04, “Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820): Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in U.S. GAAP and IFRSs.” The pronouncement was issued to provide a uniform framework for fair value measurements and related disclosures between U.S. GAAP and International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRS”). ASU 2011-04 changes certain fair value measurement principles and enhances the disclosure requirements particularly for level 3 fair value measurements. This pronouncement is effective for us in the first quarter of 2012 and is not expected to have a significant impact to our consolidated financial statements.

In June 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-05, “Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Presentation of Comprehensive Income.” ASU 2011-05 eliminates the option to present components of other comprehensive income as part of the statement of shareholders’ equity and requires the presentation of components of net income and components of other comprehensive income either in a single continuous statement of comprehensive income or in two separate but consecutive statements. This pronouncement is effective for us in the first quarter of 2012 and will not have a significant impact to our consolidated financial statements.

 

25


Table of Contents

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Due to the nature of our business and strategy, we typically generate significant amounts of cash from operations. The cash generated from operations is primarily paid to our common and preferred shareholders in the form of dividends. As a REIT, we must generally make annual distributions to shareholders of at least 90% of our taxable income.

Our short-term liquidity requirements consist primarily of normal recurring operating expenses, obligations under our capital and operating leases, regular debt service requirements (including debt service relating to additional or replacement debt, as well as scheduled debt maturities), recurring expenditures, non-recurring expenditures (such as tenant improvements and redevelopments) and dividends to common and preferred shareholders. Our long-term capital requirements consist primarily of maturities under our long-term debt agreements, development and redevelopment costs and potential acquisitions.

We intend to operate with and maintain a conservative capital structure that will allow us to maintain strong debt service coverage and fixed-charge coverage ratios as part of our commitment to investment-grade debt ratings. In the short and long term, we may seek to obtain funds through the issuance of additional equity, unsecured and/or secured debt financings, joint venture relationships relating to existing properties or new acquisitions, and property dispositions that are consistent with this conservative structure.

On February 24, 2011, we entered into an ATM equity program in which we may from time to time offer and sell common shares having an aggregate offering price of up to $300.0 million. Through June 30, 2011, we have issued 1,085,611 common shares for net cash proceeds of $90.1 million under the program.

Cash and cash equivalents increased $4.1 million to $19.8 million at June 30, 2011; however, cash and cash equivalents are not the only indicator of our liquidity. We also had a $300.0 million unsecured revolving credit facility which had an outstanding balance of $189.0 million at June 30, 2011. On July 7, 2011 we replaced the $300.0 million facility with a new $400.0 million unsecured revolving credit facility. This new revolving credit facility matures on July 6, 2015, subject to a one-year extension at our option, and bears interest at LIBOR plus 115 basis points. The spread over LIBOR is subject to adjustment based on our credit rating. In addition, we have an option to increase the credit facility through an accordion feature to $800 million.

For the six months ended June 30, 2011, the maximum amount of borrowings outstanding under our $300.0 million revolving credit facility was $265.0 million, the weighted average amount of borrowings outstanding was $186.6 million and the weighted average interest rate, before amortization of debt fees, was 0.68%. Also, as of June 30, 2011, we had the capacity to issue up to $208.3 million in common shares under our ATM equity program. As of June 30, 2011, we have no debt maturities related to mortgages payable or senior notes and debentures during the remainder of 2011. We currently believe that cash flows from operations, cash on hand, our ATM equity program and our revolving credit facility will be sufficient to finance our operations and fund our capital expenditures.

Our overall capital requirements during the remainder of 2011 will depend upon acquisition opportunities, the level of improvements and redevelopments on existing properties and the timing and cost of development of Assembly Row and future phases of existing properties. While the amount of future expenditures will depend on numerous factors, we expect to incur at least similar levels of capital expenditures in 2011 compared to prior periods which will be funded on a short-term basis with cash flow from operations, cash on hand, our revolving credit facility and/or shares issued under our ATM equity program, and on a long-term basis, with long-term debt or equity. If necessary, we may access the debt or equity capital markets to finance significant acquisitions. Given our past success as well as the status of the capital markets, we expect debt or equity to be available to us. Although there is no intent at this time, if market conditions deteriorate, we may also delay the timing of certain development and redevelopment projects as well as limit future acquisitions, reduce our operating expenditures, or re-evaluate our dividend policy.

In addition to conditions in the capital markets which could affect our ability to access those markets, the following factors could affect our ability to meet our liquidity requirements:

 

   

restrictions in our debt instruments or preferred shares may limit us from incurring debt or issuing equity at all, or on acceptable terms under then-prevailing market conditions; and

 

   

we may be unable to service additional or replacement debt due to increases in interest rates or a decline in our operating performance.

 

26


Table of Contents

Summary of Cash Flows

 

     Six Months Ended June 30,  
     2011     2010  
     (In thousands)  

Cash provided by operating activities

   $ 118,698      $ 129,345   

Cash used in investing activities

     (76,760     (61,945

Cash used in financing activities

     (37,887     (179,232
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents

     4,051        (111,832

Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year

     15,797        135,389   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents, end of period

   $ 19,848      $ 23,557   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net cash provided by operating activities decreased $10.6 million to $118.7 million during the six months ended June 30, 2011 from $129.3 million during the six months ended June 30, 2010. The decrease was primarily attributable to the $16.2 million payment of the final judgment related to a previously disclosed lawsuit offset by higher net income before certain non-cash items.

Net cash used in investing activities increased $14.8 million to $76.8 million during the six months ended June 30, 2011 from $61.9 million during the six months ended June 30, 2010. The increase was primarily attributable to:

 

   

$26.1 million increase in capital investments, and

 

   

$18.9 million related to the acquisition of Tower Shops in January 2011,

partially offset by

 

   

$10.5 million acquisition of a first mortgage loan in March 2010,

 

   

$9.8 million decrease in contributions to the Newbury Street Partnership due to the $16.7 million initial investment in 2010, and

 

   

$8.7 million payment received in June 2011 related to the refinancing of a mortgage loan receivable.

Net cash used in financing activities decreased $141.3 million to $37.9 million during the six months ended June 30, 2011 from $179.2 million during the six months ended June 30, 2010. The decrease was primarily attributable to:

 

   

$170.4 million decrease in repayment of mortgages, capital leases and notes payable due substantially to the $250.0 million payoff of our term loan in 2010 offset by the payoff of two mortgages totaling $37.4 million in 2011,

 

   

$112.0 million increase in net borrowings on our revolving credit facility, and

 

   

$93.3 million increase in net proceeds from the issuance of common shares due primarily to the sale of 1.1 million shares under our ATM equity program entered into in February 2011,

partially offset by

 

   

$148.5 million in net proceeds from the issuance of 5.90% senior notes in March 2010 and no issuances in 2011,

 

   

$75.0 million repayment of 4.50% senior notes in February 2011, and

 

   

$10.0 million in public funding received for the development at Assembly Row in April 2010.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We have a joint venture arrangement (the “Partnership”) with affiliates of a discretionary fund created and advised by ING Clarion Partners (“Clarion”). We own 30% of the equity in the Partnership and Clarion owns 70%. We hold a general partnership interest, however, Clarion also holds a general partnership interest and has substantive participating rights. We cannot make significant decisions without Clarion’s approval. Accordingly, we account for our interest in the Partnership using the equity method. As of June 30, 2011, the Partnership owned seven retail real estate properties. We are the manager of the Partnership and its properties, earning fees for acquisitions, management, leasing and financing. We also have the opportunity to receive performance-based earnings through our Partnership interest. The Partnership is subject to a buy-sell provision which is customary in real estate joint venture agreements and the industry. Either partner may initiate this provision at any time, which could result in either the sale of our interest or the use of available cash or borrowings to acquire Clarion’s interest. Accounting policies for the Partnership are similar to accounting policies followed by the Trust. At June 30, 2011, our investment in the Partnership was $35.0 million and the Partnership had approximately $57.5 million of mortgages payable outstanding. Our share of principal and interest payments is as follows:

 

     Joint Venture Commitments Due by Period  
   Total      Less Than
1 Year
     1-3
Years
     3-5
Years
     After 5
Years
 
   (In thousands)  

Fixed rate debt (principal and interest)

   $ 21,586       $ 528       $ 2,112       $ 8,272       $ 10,674   

 

27


Table of Contents

In May 2010, we formed Taurus Newbury Street JV II Limited Partnership (“Newbury Street Partnership”), a joint venture limited partnership with an affiliate of Taurus Investment Holdings, LLC (“Taurus”), which plans to acquire, operate and redevelop up to $200 million in properties located primarily in the Back Bay section of Boston, Massachusetts. We hold an 85% limited partnership interest in Newbury Street Partnership and Taurus holds a 15% limited partnership interest and serves as general partner. As general partner, Taurus is responsible for the operation and management of the properties, subject to our approval on major decisions. We have evaluated the entity and determined that it is not a VIE. Accordingly, given Taurus’ role as general partner, we account for our interest in Newbury Street Partnership using the equity method. Accounting policies for the Newbury Street Partnership are similar to accounting policies followed by the Trust. The entity is subject to a buy-sell provision which is customary for real estate joint venture agreements and the industry. The buy-sell can be exercised only in certain circumstances through May 2014 and may be initiated by either party at anytime thereafter which could result in either the sale of our interest or the use of available cash or borrowings to acquire Taurus’ interest.

On May 26, 2011, Newbury Street Partnership acquired the fee interest in a 6,700 square foot building located on Newbury Street for a purchase price of $6.2 million. We contributed approximately $2.8 million towards the acquisition and provided a $3.1 million interest-only loan secured by the building. This loan and the $8.8 million loan secured by the other two buildings owned by the partnership bear interest at LIBOR plus 400 basis points and mature in May 2012, subject to a one-year extension option. This purchase increases Newbury Street Partnership’s portfolio to three buildings all located on Newbury Street with a total of approximately 39,000 square feet of mixed-use gross leasable area. At June 30, 2011, we had invested approximately $23.7 million in Newbury Street Partnership including $11.8 million in mortgage loans.

 

28


Table of Contents

Debt Financing Arrangements

The following is a summary of our total debt outstanding as of June 30, 2011:

 

Description of Debt

   Original
Debt
Issued
     Principal Balance
as  of
June 30, 2011
    Stated Interest Rate
as  of
June 30, 2011
    Maturity Date  
     (Dollars in thousands)              

Mortgages payable (1)

         

Secured fixed rate

         

Courtyard Shops

     Acquired         7,169        6.87     July 1, 2012   

Bethesda Row

     Acquired         19,994        5.37     January 1, 2013   

Bethesda Row

     Acquired         4,090        5.05     February 1, 2013   

White Marsh Plaza (2)

     Acquired         9,434        6.04     April 1, 2013   

Crow Canyon

     Acquired         20,174        5.40     August 11, 2013   

Idylwood Plaza

     16,910         16,413        7.50     June 5, 2014   

Leesburg Plaza

     29,423         28,558        7.50     June 5, 2014   

Loehmann’s Plaza

     38,047         36,928        7.50     June 5, 2014   

Pentagon Row

     54,619         53,012        7.50     June 5, 2014   

Melville Mall (3)

     Acquired         22,703        5.25     September 1, 2014   

THE AVENUE at White Marsh

     Acquired         57,211        5.46     January 1, 2015   

Barracks Road

     44,300         39,431        7.95     November 1, 2015   

Hauppauge

     16,700         14,864        7.95     November 1, 2015   

Lawrence Park

     31,400         27,949        7.95     November 1, 2015   

Wildwood

     27,600         24,566        7.95     November 1, 2015   

Wynnewood

     32,000         28,483        7.95     November 1, 2015   

Brick Plaza

     33,000         29,099        7.42     November 1, 2015   

Rollingwood Apartments

     24,050         23,402        5.54     May 1, 2019   

Shoppers’ World

     Acquired         5,520        5.91     January 31, 2021   

Mount Vernon (4)

     13,250         10,749        5.66     April 15, 2028   

Chelsea

     Acquired         7,712        5.36     January 15, 2031   
     

 

 

     

Subtotal

        487,461       

Net unamortized discount

        (460    
     

 

 

     

Total mortgages payable

        487,001       
     

 

 

     

Notes payable

         

Unsecured fixed rate

         

Various (5)

     15,308         10,902        3.37     Various through 2013   

Unsecured variable rate

         

Revolving credit facility (6)

     300,000         189,000        LIBOR + 0.425     July 27, 2011   

Escondido (Municipal bonds) (7)

     9,400         9,400        0.21     October 1, 2016   
     

 

 

     

Total notes payable

        209,302       
     

 

 

     

Senior notes and debentures

         

Unsecured fixed rate

         

6.00% notes

     175,000         175,000        6.00     July 15, 2012   

5.40% notes

     135,000         135,000        5.40     December 1, 2013   

5.95% notes

     150,000         150,000        5.95     August 15, 2014   

5.65% notes

     125,000         125,000        5.65     June 1, 2016   

6.20% notes

     200,000         200,000        6.20     January 15, 2017   

5.90% notes

     150,000         150,000        5.90     April 1, 2020   

7.48% debentures

     50,000         29,200        7.48     August 15, 2026   

6.82% medium term notes

     40,000         40,000        6.82     August 1, 2027   
     

 

 

     

Subtotal

        1,004,200       

Net unamortized premium

        537       
     

 

 

     

Total senior notes and debentures

        1,004,737       
     

 

 

     

Capital lease obligations

         

Various

        59,252        Various        Various through 2106   
     

 

 

     

Total debt and capital lease obligations

      $ 1,760,292       
     

 

 

     

 

29


Table of Contents

 

1) Mortgages payable do not include our 30% share ($17.2 million) of the $57.5 million debt of the partnership with a discretionary fund created and advised by ING Clarion Partners. It also excludes $11.8 million in mortgage loans on our Newbury Street Partnership for which we are the lender.
2) The interest rate of 6.04% represents the weighted average interest rate for two mortgage loans secured by this property. The loan balance represents an interest only loan of $4.4 million at a stated rate of 6.18% and the remaining balance at a stated rate of 5.96%.
3) We acquired control of Melville Mall through a 20-year master lease and secondary financing. Because we control the activities that most significantly impact this property and retain substantially all of the economic benefit and risk associated with it, this property is consolidated and the mortgage loan is reflected on the balance sheet, though it is not our legal obligation.
4) The interest rate is fixed at 5.66% for the first ten years and then will be reset to a market rate in 2013. The lender has the option to call the loan on April 15, 2013 or any time thereafter.
5) The interest rate of 3.37% represents the weighted average interest rate for three unsecured fixed rate notes payable. These notes mature between April 1, 2012 and January 31, 2013.
6) The maximum amount drawn under our revolving credit facility during the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 was $265.0 million. The weighted average effective interest rate on borrowings under our revolving credit facility, before amortization of debt fees, was 0.66% and 0.68% for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011, respectively. On July 7, 2011, we replaced our existing revolving credit facility with a new $400.0 million unsecured revolving credit facility. This new revolving credit facility matures on July 6, 2015, subject to a one-year extension at our option, and bears interest at LIBOR plus 115 basis points.
7) The bonds require monthly interest only payments through maturity. The bonds bear interest at a variable rate determined weekly, which would enable the bonds to be remarketed at 100% of their principal amount. The property is not encumbered by a lien.

Our revolving credit facility and other debt agreements include financial and other covenants that may limit our operating activities in the future. As of June 30, 2011, we were in compliance with all of the financial and other covenants. If we were to breach any of our debt covenants and did not cure the breach within an applicable cure period, our lenders could require us to repay the debt immediately and, if the debt is secured, could immediately begin proceedings to take possession of the property securing the loan. Many of our debt arrangements, including our public notes and our revolving credit facility, are cross-defaulted, which means that the lenders under those debt arrangements can put us in default and require immediate repayment of their debt if we breach and fail to cure a default under certain of our other debt obligations. As a result, any default under our debt covenants could have an adverse effect on our financial condition, our results of operations, our ability to meet our obligations and the market value of our shares. Our organizational documents do not limit the level or amount of debt that we may incur.

The following is a summary of our scheduled principal repayments as of June 30, 2011:

 

     Unsecured     Secured      Capital Lease      Total  
     (In thousands)  

Remainder of 2011

   $ 189,145 (1)    $ 4,857       $ 715       $ 194,717   

2012

     185,727        17,380         1,500         204,607   

2013

     135,030        72,107         1,609         208,746   

2014

     150,000        156,364         1,725         308,089   

2015

     —          203,398         1,851         205,249   

Thereafter

     553,600        33,355         51,852         638,807   
  

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 
   $ 1,213,502      $ 487,461       $ 59,252       $ 1,760,215 (2) 
  

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

1) Our $300.0 million revolving credit facility was scheduled to mature on July 27, 2011. As of June 30, 2011, there was $189.0 million drawn under this credit facility. On July 7, 2011, we replaced our existing revolving credit facility with a new $400.0 million unsecured revolving credit facility that matures on July 6, 2015, subject to a one-year extension at our option.
2) The total debt maturities differs from the total reported on the consolidated balance sheet due to the unamortized net premium or discount on certain mortgage loans, senior notes and debentures as of June 30, 2011.

Interest Rate Hedging

We had no hedging instruments outstanding during the three and six months ended June 30, 2011. We may use derivative instruments to manage exposure to variable interest rate risk. We generally enter into interest rate swaps to manage our

 

30


Table of Contents

exposure to variable interest rate risk and treasury locks to manage the risk of interest rates rising prior to the issuance of debt. We enter into derivative instruments that qualify as cash flow hedges and do not enter into derivative instruments for speculative purposes.

Funds From Operations

Funds from operations (“FFO”) is a supplemental non-GAAP financial measure of real estate companies’ operating performance. The National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts (“NAREIT”) defines FFO as follows: net income, computed in accordance with the U.S. GAAP, plus depreciation and amortization of real estate assets and excluding extraordinary items and gains and losses on the sale of real estate. We compute FFO in accordance with the NAREIT definition, and we have historically reported our FFO available for common shareholders in addition to our net income and net cash provided by operating activities. It should be noted that FFO:

 

   

does not represent cash flows from operating activities in accordance with GAAP (which, unlike FFO, generally reflects all cash effects of transactions and other events in the determination of net income);

 

   

should not be considered an alternative to net income as an indication of our performance; and

 

   

is not necessarily indicative of cash flow as a measure of liquidity or ability to fund cash needs, including the payment of dividends.

We consider FFO available for common shareholders a meaningful, additional measure of operating performance primarily because it excludes the assumption that the value of the real estate assets diminishes predictably over time, as implied by the historical cost convention of GAAP and the recording of depreciation. We use FFO primarily as one of several means of assessing our operating performance in comparison with other REITs. Comparison of our presentation of FFO to similarly titled measures for other REITs may not necessarily be meaningful due to possible differences in the application of the NAREIT definition used by such REITs.

An increase or decrease in FFO available for common shareholders does not necessarily result in an increase or decrease in aggregate distributions because our Board of Trustees is not required to increase distributions on a quarterly basis unless necessary for us to maintain REIT status. However, we must distribute at least 90% of our taxable income to remain qualified as a REIT. Therefore, a significant increase in FFO will generally require an increase in distributions to shareholders although not necessarily on a proportionate basis.

The reconciliation of net income to FFO available for common shareholders is as follows:

 

     Three Months Ended
June  30,
    Six Months Ended
June 30,
 
     2011     2010     2011     2010  
     (In thousands, except per share data)  

Net income

   $ 36,471      $ 32,368      $ 68,855      $ 62,922   

Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests

     (1,714     (1,254     (2,912     (2,588

Gain on sale of real estate

     (43     (1,410     (43     (1,410

Gain on deconsolidation of VIE

     (2,026     —          (2,026     —     

Depreciation and amortization of real estate assets

     28,463        27,797        56,052        53,884   

Amortization of initial direct costs of leases

     2,813        2,561        5,053        4,797   

Depreciation of joint venture real estate assets

     431        345        858        696   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Funds from operations

     64,395        60,407        125,837        118,301   

Dividends on preferred shares

     (135     (135     (271     (271

Income attributable to operating partnership units

     241        244        484        489   

Income attributable to unvested shares

     (228     (201     (508     (392
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Funds from operations available for common shareholders

   $ 64,273      $ 60,315      $ 125,542      $ 118,127   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Weighted average number of common shares, diluted (1)

     62,752        61,680        62,373        61,636   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Funds from operations available for common shareholders, per diluted share

   $ 1.02      $ 0.98      $ 2.01      $ 1.92   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

(1) For the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, the weighted average common shares used to compute FFO per diluted common share includes operating partnership units that were excluded from the computation of diluted EPS. Conversion of these operating partnership units is dilutive in the computation of FFO per diluted common share but is anti-dilutive for the computation of diluted EPS for the periods presented.

 

31


Table of Contents
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

Our use of financial instruments, such as debt instruments, subjects us to market risk which may affect our future earnings and cash flows, as well as the fair value of our assets. Market risk generally refers to the risk of loss from changes in interest rates and market prices. We manage our market risk by attempting to match anticipated inflow of cash from our operating, investing and financing activities with anticipated outflow of cash to fund debt payments, dividends to common and preferred shareholders, investments, capital expenditures and other cash requirements.

As of June 30, 2011, we were not party to any open derivative financial instruments. We may enter into certain types of derivative financial instruments to further reduce interest rate risk. We use interest rate protection and swap agreements, for example, to convert some of our variable rate debt to a fixed-rate basis or to hedge anticipated financing transactions. We use derivatives for hedging purposes rather than speculation and do not enter into financial instruments for trading purposes.

Interest Rate Risk

The following discusses the effect of hypothetical changes in market rates of interest on interest expense for our variable rate debt and on the fair value of our total outstanding debt, including our fixed-rate debt. Interest rate risk amounts were determined by considering the impact of hypothetical interest rates on our debt. Quoted market prices were used to estimate the fair value of our marketable senior notes and debentures and discounted cash flow analysis is generally used to estimate the fair value of our mortgages and notes payable. Considerable judgment is necessary to estimate the fair value of financial instruments. This analysis does not purport to take into account all of the factors that may affect our debt, such as the effect that a changing interest rate environment could have on the overall level of economic activity or the action that our management might take to reduce our exposure to the change. This analysis assumes no change in our financial structure.

Fixed Interest Rate Debt

The majority of our outstanding debt obligations (maturing at various times through 2031 or through 2106 including capital lease obligations) have fixed interest rates which limit the risk of fluctuating interest rates. However, interest rate fluctuations may affect the fair value of our fixed rate debt instruments. At June 30, 2011, we had $1.5 billion of fixed-rate debt outstanding and $59.3 million of capital lease obligations. If market interest rates used to calculate the fair value on our fixed-rate debt instruments at June 30, 2011 had been 1.0% higher, the fair value of those debt instruments on that date would have decreased by approximately $61.7 million. If market interest rates used to calculate the fair value on our fixed-rate debt instruments at June 30, 2011 had been 1.0% lower, the fair value of those debt instruments on that date would have increased by approximately $65.7 million.

Variable Interest Rate Debt

Generally, we believe that our primary interest rate risk is due to fluctuations in interest rates on our variable rate debt. At June 30, 2011, we had $198.4 million of variable rate debt outstanding which consisted of $189.0 million outstanding on our revolving credit facility and $9.4 million of municipal bonds. Based upon this amount of variable rate debt and the specific terms, if market interest rates increased 1.0%, our annual interest expense would increase by approximately $2.0 million, and our net income and cash flows for the year would decrease by approximately $2.0 million. Conversely, if market interest rates decreased 1.0%, our annual interest expense would decrease by approximately $1.1 million with a corresponding increase in our net income and cash flows for the year.

 

ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Periodic Evaluation and Conclusion of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

An evaluation has been performed, under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of June 30, 2011. Based on this evaluation, our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of June 30, 2011 to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed in our reports filed or submitted under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the rules and forms of the SEC.

 

32


Table of Contents

Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

There has been no change in our internal controls over financial reporting during the quarterly period covered by this report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

PART II—OTHER INFORMATION

 

ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

None.

 

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS

There have been no material changes to the risk factors previously disclosed in our Annual Report for the year ended December 31, 2010 filed with the SEC on February 15, 2011. These factors include, but are not limited to, the following:

 

   

risks that our tenants will not pay rent, may vacate early or may file for bankruptcy or that we may be unable to renew leases or re-let space at favorable rents as leases expire;

 

   

risks that we may not be able to proceed with or obtain necessary approvals for any redevelopment or renovation project, and that completion of anticipated or ongoing property redevelopment or renovation projects that we do pursue may cost more, take more time to complete or fail to perform as expected;

 

   

risks that the number of properties we acquire for our own account, and therefore the amount of capital we invest in acquisitions, may be impacted by our real estate partnerships;

 

   

risks normally associated with the real estate industry, including risks that:

 

   

occupancy levels at our properties and the amount of rent that we receive from our properties may be lower than expected,

 

   

new acquisitions may fail to perform as expected,

 

   

competition for acquisitions could result in increased prices for acquisitions,

 

   

costs associated with the periodic maintenance and repair or renovation of space, insurance and other operations may increase;

 

   

environmental issues may develop at our properties and result in unanticipated costs, and

 

   

because real estate is illiquid, we may not be able to sell properties when appropriate;

 

   

risks that our growth will be limited if we cannot obtain additional capital;

 

   

risks associated with general economic conditions, including local economic conditions in our geographic markets;

 

   

risks of financing, such as our ability to consummate additional financings or obtain replacement financing on terms which are acceptable to us, our ability to meet existing financial covenants and the limitations imposed on our operations by those covenants, and the possibility of increases in interest rates that would result in increased interest expense; and

 

   

risks related to our status as a REIT, for federal income tax purposes, such as the existence of complex tax regulations relating to our status as a REIT, the effect of future changes in REIT requirements as a result of new legislation, and the adverse consequences of the failure to qualify as a REIT.

 

ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS

Under the terms of various operating partnership agreements of certain of our affiliated limited partnerships, the interests of limited partners in those limited partnerships may be redeemed, subject to certain conditions, for cash or an equivalent number of our common shares, at our option. On April 4, 2011, we redeemed 2,000 operating partnership units for cash.

 

ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES

None.

 

33


Table of Contents
ITEM 4. [REMOVED AND RESERVED]

 

ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION

None.

 

ITEM 6. EXHIBITS

A list of exhibits to this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q is set forth on the Exhibit Index immediately preceding such exhibits and is incorporated herein by reference.

 

34


Table of Contents

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto authorized.

 

  FEDERAL REALTY INVESTMENT TRUST
August 3, 2011  

/s/    Donald C. Wood        

  Donald C. Wood,
  President, Chief Executive Officer and Trustee
  (Principal Executive Officer)
August 3, 2011  

/s/    Andrew P. Blocher        

  Andrew P. Blocher,
  Senior Vice President -
  Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
  (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)

 

35


Table of Contents

EXHIBIT INDEX

 

Exhibit

No.

  

Description

  3.1    Declaration of Trust of Federal Realty Investment Trust dated May 5, 1999 as amended by the Articles of Amendment of Declaration of Trust of Federal Realty Investment Trust dated May 6, 2004, as corrected by the Certificate of Correction of Articles of Amendment of Declaration of Trust of Federal Realty Investment Trust dated June 17, 2004, as amended by the Articles of Amendment of Declaration of Trust of Federal Realty Investment Trust dated May 6, 2009 (previously filed as Exhibit 3.1 to the Trust’s Registration Statement on Form S-3 (File No. 333-160009) and incorporated herein by reference)
  3.2    Amended and Restated Bylaws of Federal Realty Investment Trust dated February 12, 2003, as amended October 29, 2003, May 5, 2004, February 17, 2006 and May 6, 2009 (previously filed as Exhibit 3.2 to the Trust’s Registration Statement on Form S-3 (File No. 333-160009) and incorporated herein by reference)
  4.1    Specimen Common Share certificate (previously filed as Exhibit 4(i) to the Trust’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1999 (File No. 1-07533) and incorporated herein by reference)
  4.2    Articles Supplementary relating to the 5.417% Series 1 Cumulative Convertible Preferred Shares of Beneficial Interest (previously filed as Exhibit 4.1 to the Trust’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on March 13, 2007, (File No. 1-07533) and incorporated herein by reference)
  4.3    Amended and Restated Rights Agreement, dated March 11, 1999, between the Trust and American Stock Transfer & Trust Company (previously filed as Exhibit 1 to the Trust’s Registration Statement on Form 8-A/A filed on March 11, 1999 (File No. 1-07533) and incorporated herein by reference)
  4.4    First Amendment to Amended and Restated Rights Agreement, dated as of November 2003, between the Trust and American Stock Transfer & Trust Company (previously filed as Exhibit 4.5 to the Trust’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003 (File No. 1-07533) and incorporated herein by reference)
  4.5    Second Amendment to Amended and Restated Rights Agreement, dated as of March 11, 2009, between the Trust and American Stock Transfer & Trust Company (previously filed as Exhibit 4.3 to the Trust’s current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 001-07533) and incorporated herein by reference)
  4.6    Indenture dated December 1, 1993 related to the Trust’s 7.48% Debentures due August 15, 2026; and 6.82% Medium Term Notes due August 1, 2027; (previously filed as Exhibit 4(a) to the Trust’s Registration Statement on Form S-3 (File No. 33-51029), and amended on Form S-3 (File No. 33-63687), filed on December 13, 1993 and incorporated herein by reference)
  4.7    Indenture dated September 1, 1998 related to the Trust’s 5.65% Notes due 2016; 6.00% Notes due 2012; 6.20% Notes due 2017; 5.40% Notes due 2013; 5.95% Notes due 2014 and the 5.90% Notes due 2020 (previously filed as Exhibit 4(a) to the Trust’s Registration Statement on Form S-3 (File No. 333-63619) filed on September 17, 1998 and incorporated herein by reference)
  4.8    Pursuant to Regulation S-K Item 601(b)(4)(iii), the Trust by this filing agrees, upon request, to furnish to the Securities and Exchange Commission a copy of other instruments defining the rights of holders of long-term debt of the Trust
10.1    Amended and Restated 1993 Long-Term Incentive Plan, as amended on October 6, 1997 and further amended on May 6, 1998 (previously filed as Exhibit 10.26 to the Trust’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1998 (File No. 1-07533) and incorporated herein by reference)
10.2    Severance Agreement between the Trust and Donald C. Wood dated February 22, 1999 (previously filed as a portion of Exhibit 10 to the Trust’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 1999 (File No. 1-07533) (the “1999 1Q Form 10-Q”) and incorporated herein by reference)
10.3    Executive Agreement between Federal Realty Investment Trust and Donald C. Wood dated February 22, 1999 (previously filed as a portion of Exhibit 10 to the 1999 1Q Form 10-Q and incorporated herein by reference)
10.4    Amendment to Executive Agreement between Federal Realty Investment Trust and Donald C. Wood dated February 16, 2005 (previously filed as Exhibit 10.12 to the Trust’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004 (File No. 1-07533) (the “2004 Form 10-K”) and incorporated herein by reference)

 

36


Table of Contents

Exhibit

No.

  

Description

10.5    Split Dollar Life Insurance Agreement dated August 12, 1998 between the Trust and Donald C. Wood (previously filed as a portion of Exhibit 10 to the Trust’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2000 (File No. 1-07533) and incorporated herein by reference)
10.6    Severance Agreement between the Trust and Jeffrey S. Berkes dated March 1, 2000 (previously filed as a portion of Exhibit 10 to the Trust’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001 (File No. 1-07533) and incorporated herein by reference)
10.7    Amendment to Severance Agreement between Federal Realty Investment Trust and Jeffrey S. Berkes dated February 16, 2005 (previously filed as Exhibit 10.17 to the 2004 Form 10-K and incorporated herein by reference)
10.8    2001 Long-Term Incentive Plan (previously filed as Exhibit 99.1 to the Trust’s S-8 Registration Number 333-60364 filed on May 7, 2001 and incorporated herein by reference)
10.9    Health Coverage Continuation Agreement between Federal Realty Investment Trust and Donald C. Wood dated February 16, 2005 (previously filed as Exhibit 10.26 to the 2004 Form 10-K and incorporated herein by reference)
10.10    Severance Agreement between the Trust and Dawn M. Becker dated April 19, 2000 (previously filed as Exhibit 10.26 to the Trust’s 2005 2Q Form 10-Q and incorporated herein by reference)
10.11    Amendment to Severance Agreement between the Trust and Dawn M. Becker dated February 16, 2005 (previously filed as Exhibit 10.27 to the 2004 Form 10-K and incorporated herein by reference)
10.12    Form of Restricted Share Award Agreement for awards made under the Trust’s 2003 Long-Term Incentive Award Program for shares issued out of 2001 Long-Term Incentive Plan (previously filed as Exhibit 10.28 to the 2004 Form 10-K and incorporated herein by reference)
10.13    Form of Restricted Share Award Agreement for awards made under the Trust’s Annual Incentive Bonus Program for shares issued out of 2001 Long-Term Incentive Plan (previously filed as Exhibit 10.29 to the 2004 Form 10-K and incorporated herein by reference)
10.14    Form of Option Award Agreement for options awarded under 2001 Long-Term Incentive Plan (previously filed as Exhibit 10.30 to the 2004 Form 10-K and incorporated herein by reference)
10.15    Form of Option Award Agreement for awards made under the Trust’s 2003 Long-Term Incentive Award Program for shares issued out of the 2001 Long-Term Incentive Plan (previously filed as Exhibit 10.32 to the 2005 Form 10-K and incorporated herein by reference)
10.16    Credit Agreement dated as of July 28, 2006, by and between the Trust, Wachovia Capital Markets LLC, Wachovia Bank, National Association and various other financial institutions (previously filed as Exhibit 10.20 to the Trust’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2010 (File No. 1-07533) and incorporated herein by reference)
10.17    Amended and Restated 2001 Long-Term Incentive Plan (previously filed as Exhibit 10.34 to the Trust’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2008 (File No. 1-07533) and incorporated herein by reference)
10.18    Change in Control Agreement between the Trust and Andrew P. Blocher dated February 12, 2007 (previously filed as Exhibit 10.27 to the Trust’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2008 (File No. 1-07533) and incorporated herein by reference)
10.19    Amendment to Severance Agreement between the Trust and Donald C. Wood dated January 1, 2009 (previously filed as Exhibit 10.26 to the Trust’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 (File No. 1-07533) (“the 2008 Form 10-K”) and incorporated herein by reference)
10.20    Second Amendment to Executive Agreement between the Trust and Donald C. Wood dated January 1, 2009 (previously filed as Exhibit 10.27 to the Trust’s 2008 Form 10-K and incorporated herein by reference)
10.21    Amendment to Health Coverage Continuation Agreement between the Trust and Donald C. Wood dated January 1, 2009 (previously filed as Exhibit 10.28 to the Trust’s 2008 Form 10-K and incorporated herein by reference)
10.22    Second Amendment to Severance Agreement between the Trust and Jeffrey S. Berkes dated January 1, 2009 (previously filed as Exhibit 10.29 to the Trust’s 2008 Form 10-K and incorporated herein by reference)

 

37


Table of Contents

Exhibit

No.

  

Description

10.23    Second Amendment to Severance Agreement between the Trust and Dawn M. Becker dated January 1, 2009 (previously filed as Exhibit 10.30 to the Trust’s 2008 Form 10-K and incorporated herein by reference)
10.24    Amendment to Change in Control Agreement between the Trust and Andrew P. Blocher dated January 1, 2009 (previously filed as Exhibit 10.31 to the Trust’s 2008 Form 10-K and incorporated herein by reference)
10.25    Amendment to Stock Option Agreements between the Trust and Andrew P. Blocher dated February 17, 2009 (previously filed as Exhibit 10.32 to the Trust’s 2008 Form 10-K and incorporated herein by reference)
10.26    Restricted Share Award Agreement between the Trust and Andrew P. Blocher dated February 17, 2009 (previously filed as Exhibit 10.33 to the Trust’s 2008 Form 10-K and incorporated herein by reference)
10.27    Combined Incentive and Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement between the Trust and Andrew P. Blocher dated February 17, 2009 (previously filed as Exhibit 10.34 to the Trust’s 2008 Form 10-K and incorporated herein by reference)
10.28    Severance Agreement between the Trust and Andrew P. Blocher dated February 17, 2009 (previously filed as Exhibit 10.35 to the Trust’s 2008 Form 10-K and incorporated herein by reference)
10.29    2010 Performance Incentive Plan (previously filed as Appendix A to the Trust’s Definitive Proxy Statement for the 2010 Annual Meeting of Shareholders (File No. 01-07533) and incorporated herein by reference)
10.30    Amendment to 2010 Performance Incentive Plan (“the 2010 Plan”) (previously filed as Appendix A to the Trust’s Proxy Supplement for the 2010 Annual Meeting of Shareholders (File No. 01-07533) and incorporated herein by reference)
10.31    Restricted Share Award Agreement between the Trust and Donald C. Wood dated October 12, 2010 (previously filed as Exhibit 10.36 to the Trust’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2010 (File No. 01-07533) and incorporated herein by reference)
10.32    Form of Restricted Share Award Agreement for awards made under the Trust’s Long-Term Incentive Award Program and the Trust’s Annual Incentive Bonus Program and basic awards with annual vesting for shares issued out of the 2010 Plan (previously filed as Exhibit 10.34 to the Trust’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 (File No. 1-07533) (the “2010 Form 10-K”) and incorporated herein by reference)
10.33    Form of Restricted Share Award Agreement for long-term vesting and retention awards made under the Trust’s Long-Term Incentive Award Program for shares issued out of the 2010 Plan (previously filed as Exhibit 10.35 to the Trust’s 2010 Form 10-K (File No. 1-07533) and incorporated herein by reference)
10.34    Form of Restricted Share Award Agreement for front loaded awards made under the Trust’s Long-Term Incentive Award Program for shares issued out of the 2010 Plan (previously filed as Exhibit 10.36 to the Trust’s 2010 Form 10-K (File No. 1-07533) and incorporated herein by reference)
10.35    Form of Performance Share Award Agreement for awards made under the Trust’s Long-Term Incentive Award Program for shares issued out of the 2010 Plan (previously filed as Exhibit 10.37 to the Trust’s 2010 Form 10-K (File No. 1-07533) and incorporated herein by reference)
10.36    Form of Option Award Agreement for awards made under the Trust’s Long-Term Incentive Award Program for shares issued out of the 2010 Plan (previously filed as Exhibit 10.38 to the Trust’s 2010 Form 10-K (File No. 1-07533) and incorporated herein by reference)
10.37    Form of Option Award Agreement for front loaded awards made under the Trust’s Long-Term Incentive Award Program for shares issued out of the 2010 Plan (previously filed as Exhibit 10.39 to the Trust’s 2010 Form 10-K (File No. 1-07533) and incorporated herein by reference)
10.38    Form of Option Award Agreement for basic options awarded out of the 2010 Plan (previously filed as Exhibit 10.40 to the Trust’s 2010 Form 10-K (File No. 1-07533) and incorporated herein by reference)

 

38


Table of Contents

Exhibit

No.

  

Description

  10.39    Form of Restricted Share Award Agreement, dated as of February 10, 2011, between the Trust and each of Dawn M. Becker, Jeffrey S. Berkes and Andrew P. Blocher (previously filed as Exhibit 10.41 to the Trust’s 2010 Form 10-K (File No. 1-07533) and incorporated herein by reference)
  10.40    Credit Agreement dated as of July 7, 2011, by and among the Trust, as Borrower, the financial institutions party thereto and their permitted assignees under Section 12.6., as Lenders, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Administrative Agent, PNC Bank, National Association, as Syndication Agent, Wells Fargo Securities, LLC, as a Lead Arranger and Book Manager, and PNC Capital Markets LLC, as a Lead Arranger and Book Manager (previously filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Trust’s Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 1-07533), filed on July 11, 2011 and incorporated herein by reference)
  31.1    Rule 13a-14(a) Certification of Chief Executive Officer (filed herewith)
  31.2    Rule 13a-14(a) Certification of Chief Financial Officer (filed herewith)
  32.1    Section 1350 Certification of Chief Executive Officer (filed herewith)
  32.2    Section 1350 Certification of Chief Financial Officer (filed herewith)
    101    The following materials from Federal Realty Investment Trust’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2011, formatted in XBRL (Extensible Business Reporting Language): (1) the Consolidated Balance Sheets, (2) the Consolidated Statements of Operations, (3) the Consolidated Statement of Shareholders’ Equity, (4) the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, and (5) Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements that have been detail tagged.

 

39