UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)
[X]	QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended: June 30, 2011
Or
[  ]	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
Commission File Number: 0-54309
SMTP, Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware		05-0502529
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)		(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
One Broadway, 14th Floor Cambridge, Massachusetts		02142
(Address of principal executive offices)		(Zip Code)
617-500-8635
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.     Yes x No  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Website, if any, every Interactive Date File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).  Yes x No  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company.  See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act (Check one):

Large accelerated filer	¨	Accelerated filer	¨
Non-accelerated filer	¨	Smaller reporting company	x

i

---

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.)  Yes ¨ No  x

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date:  13,840,264 shares of common stock as of August 1, 2011.

ii

---

SMTP, INC.

Table of Contents

	Page
PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION	1
Item 1. Financial Statements:.	2
Condensed Balance Sheets as of June 30, 2011(unaudited) and December 31, 2010	2
Unaudited Condensed Statements of Operations   for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011	3
Unaudited Condensed Statements of Cash Flows   for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010	4
Notes to the Unaudited Condensed Financial Statements	5
Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of  Operations	11
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure About Market Risk	14
Item 4. Controls and Procedures	14
PART II – OTHER INFORMATION	14
Item 1. Legal Proceedings.	14
Item 1A. Risk Factors.	14
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	14
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities	14
Item 4. (Removed and Reserved)	14
Item 5. Other Information.	14
Item 6. Exhibits	15
SIGNATURES	16

iii

---

PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Forward-Looking Information

This report on Form 10-Q contains forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties, such as statements about our plans, objectives, expectations, assumptions or future events. In some cases, you can identify forward-looking statements by terminology such as “anticipate,” “estimate,” “plan,” “project,” “continuing,” “ongoing,” “expect,” “we believe,” “we intend,” “may,” “should,” “will,” “could” and similar expressions denoting uncertainty or an action that may, will or is expected to occur in the future. These statements involve estimates, assumptions, known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from any future results, performances or achievements expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements.

Examples of forward-looking statements include:

·

the timing of the development of future products;

·

projections of costs, revenue, earnings, capital structure and other financial items;

·

statements of our plans and objectives;

·

statements regarding the capabilities of our business operations;

·

statements of expected future economic performance;

·

statements regarding competition in our market; and

·

assumptions underlying statements regarding us or our business.

The ultimate correctness of these forward-looking statements depends upon a number of known and unknown risks and events. We discuss our known material risks under Item 1.A “Risk Factors contained in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010. Many factors could cause our actual results to differ materially from the forward-looking statements. In addition, we cannot assess the impact of each factor on our business or the extent to which any factor, or combination of factors, may cause actual results to differ materially from those contained in any forward-looking statements.

The forward-looking statements speak only as of the date on which they are made, and, except as required by law, we undertake no obligation to update any forward-looking statement to reflect events or circumstances after the date on which the statement is made or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events.

1

---

Item 1.

Financial Statements.

SMTP, INC.

CONDENSED BALANCE SHEETS

		June 30,		December 31,
		2011		2010
		(unaudited)
Assets
Cash and cash equivalents		$ 934,527		$ 591,063
Accounts receivable		11,700		15,577
Deferred income taxes		151,765		157,962
Other current assets		34,373		28,250
Total current assets		1,132,365		792,852
Property and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation of
$8,052 and $6,555		50,746		4,019
Intangibles, net of accumulated amortization of $6,764
and $6,264		102,236		2,736
Deferred income taxes		1,047		709
Deposits		29,995		69,400
Total assets		$ 1,316,389		$ 869,716
Liabilities and Shareholders' Equity
Deferred revenue		$ 348,570		$ 297,158
Income taxes payable		80,435		100,306
Allowance for refunds and chargebacks		7,025		2,166
Accrued expenses and other		25,675		172,282
Total current liabilities		461,705		571,912
Shareholders' equity:
Preferred stock, $0.001 par value, 5,000,000 shares authorized,
no shares issued or outstanding at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively		-		-
Common stock, $0.001 par value, 50,000,000 shares authorized,
13,841,500 and 13,440,000 shares issued and outstanding at June 30, 2011    and December 31, 2010, respectively		13,842		13,440
Additional paid in capital		253,344		57,155
Retained earnings		587,498		227,209
Total shareholders' equity		854,684		297,804
Total liabilities and shareholders' equity		$ 1,316,389		$ 869,716

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed financial statements.

2

---

SMTP, INC.

UNAUDITED CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

		Three Months Ended June 30,				Six Months Ended June 30,
		2011		2010		2011		2010
Net revenues		$ 1,000,555		$ 616,240		$ 1,932,813		$ 1,182,579
Cost of services		181,634		159,979		377,480		313,039
	Gross profit	818,921		456,261		1,555,333		869,540
Operating expenses:
Sales and marketing		83,429		82,569		154,234		147,379
General and administrative		248,676		190,826		567,046		372,323
Research and development		102,862		47,948		178,857		94,265
Total operating expenses		434,967		321,343		900,137		613,967
Operating income		383,954		134,918		655,196		255,573
Other income:
Interest income		259		-		443		-
Total other income		259		-		443		-
Income before income taxes		384,213		134,918		655,639		255,573
Provision for income tax		181,286		59,407		295,350		111,677
Net income		202,927		75,511		360,289		143,896
Net income per share:
Basic		$ 0.01		$ 0.01		$ 0.03		$ 0.01
Diluted		$ 0.01		$ 0.01		$ 0.02		$ 0.01
Weighted average common shares outstanding
Basic		13,840,264		13,440,000		13,703,743		13,440,000
Diluted		15,484,904		13,440,000		14,886,013		13,440,000

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed financial statements.

3

---

SMTP, INC.

UNAUDITED CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

		Six Months Ended June 30,
		2011		2010
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income		$ 360,289		$ 143,896
Adjustments to reconcile net income to
net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization		1,998		1,559
Stock-based compensation		99,775		-
Allowance for refunds and chargebacks		4,859		5,229
Deferred income taxes		5,859		10,404
Changes in assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable		3,877		-
Other current assets		(6,123)		(69,400)
Deposits		39,405		-
Income taxes payable		(19,871)		58,975
Accrued expenses and other		(146,607)		844
Deferred revenue		51,412		(34,324)
Net cash provided by operating activities		394,873		117,183
Cash flows from investing activities:
Expenditures for intangible assets		(100,000)		-
Purchases of property and equipment		(48,225)		(3,164)
Net cash used in investing activities		(148,225)		(3,164)
Cash flows from financing activities:
Proceeds from issuance of common stock, net of offering costs		96,816		-
Short term loan to shareholder		-		(100,000)
Net cash provided by (used) in financing activities		96,816		(100,000)
Change in cash and cash equivalents		343,464		14,019
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period		591,063		122,664
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period		$ 934,527		$ 136,683
Supplemental cash flow disclosures:
Cash paid for income taxes		$ 309,362		$ 14,196

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed financial statements.

4

---

SMTP, INC.

NOTES TO THE UNAUDITED CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Note 1:

Organization and Basis of Presentation

Background

The Company was incorporated in Massachusetts on October 14, 1998 as EMUmail, Inc. and changed its name on April 1, 2010 to SMTP.com, Inc.  The Company focuses on the execution of email delivery for marketing and enterprise application customers.  The Company has customers for both corporate and personal email delivery. The Company’s services are marketed directly by the Company and through reseller partners.

On November 23, 2010, the Company formed a Delaware corporation, SMTP, Inc. for the purpose of changing the structure of the Company from a Massachusetts corporation to a Delaware corporation and to increase the number of authorized shares outstanding.  Also on November 23, 2010, the Company entered into a Merger agreement between SMTP, Inc. and SMTP.com, Inc. whereby the surviving corporation would be SMTP, Inc. (the “Surviving Corporation”), the newly formed Delaware corporation.  The Surviving Corporation has an authorized capital structure of 50,000,000 shares of common stock, par value $0.001 per share and 5,000,000 shares of preferred stock, par value $0.001 per share.  Under the terms of the Merger agreement, the Company’s existing 100 shares of ownership (which are held by a sole shareholder) were exchanged for 13,440,000 shares of common stock in the Surviving Corporation.  All financial statements have been retroactively restated to show the effects of this recapitalization.  

Basis of Presentation

In the opinion of management, the accompanying unaudited condensed financial statements include all adjustments, consisting of only normal recurring accruals, necessary for a fair statement of financial position, results of operations, and cash flows. The information included in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and the accompanying notes included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010. The accounting policies are described in the “Notes to the Financial Statements” in the 2010 Annual Report on Form 10-K and updated, as necessary, in this Form 10-Q. The year-end balance sheet data presented for comparative purposes was derived from audited financial statements, but does not include all disclosures required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. The results of operations for the six months ended June 30, 2011 are not necessarily indicative of the operating results for the full year or for any other subsequent interim period.

Certain reclassifications have been made to prior reported period amounts to conform to current year presentations.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

U.S. GAAP establishes a fair value hierarchy which has three levels based on the reliability of the inputs to determine the fair value. These levels include: Level 1, defined as inputs such as unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities; Level 2, defined as inputs other than quoted prices in active markets that are either directly or indirectly observable; and Level 3, defined as unobservable inputs for use when little or no market data exists, therefore requiring an entity to develop its own assumptions.

The Company’s financial instruments consist of cash, accounts receivable and accounts payable. The carrying amount of cash, accounts receivable and accounts payable approximates fair value because of the short-term nature of these items.

Intangibles

Our intangible assets consist of a domain name and a software license.  All such assets are capitalized at their original cost and amortized over their estimated useful lives.  The Company evaluates its intangibles for impairment whenever events or circumstances indicate that impairment may have occurred in accordance with the provisions of FASB ASC 350 “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets”.  

5

---

Income Taxes

Provision for income taxes are based on taxes payable or refundable for the current year and deferred taxes on temporary differences between the amount of taxable income and pretax financial income and between the tax bases of assets and liabilities and their reported amounts in the financial statements. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are included in the financial statements at currently enacted income tax rates applicable to the period in which the deferred tax assets and liabilities are expected to be realized or settled as prescribed in FASB ASC 740, Accounting for Income Taxes. As changes in tax laws or rates are enacted, deferred tax assets and liabilities are adjusted through the provision for income taxes. A valuation allowance is established to reduce deferred tax assets if it is more likely than not that a deferred tax asset will not be realized.

The Company applies the authoritative guidance in accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in the financial statements. This guidance prescribes a two-step process to determine the amount of tax benefit to be recognized. First, the tax position must be evaluated to determine the likelihood that it will be sustained upon external examination. If the tax position is deemed “more-likely-than-not” to be sustained, the tax position is then assessed to determine the amount of benefit to recognize in the financial statements. The amount of the benefit that may be recognized is the largest amount that has a greater than 50% likelihood of being realized upon ultimate settlement. There are no uncertain tax positions taken by the Company on its tax returns. Tax years subsequent to 2006 remain open to examination by U.S. federal and state tax jurisdictions.  

In determining the quarterly provision for income taxes, the Company uses an estimated annual effective tax rate, statutory tax rates and tax planning opportunities available to the Company in the jurisdictions in which it operates.  This includes recognition of deferred tax assets and liabilities for the expected future tax consequences of events that have been included in the financial statements or tax returns to the extent pervasive evidence exists that they will be realized in future periods. The deferred tax balances are adjusted to reflect tax rates by tax jurisdiction, based on currently enacted tax laws, which are expected to be in effect in the years in which the temporary differences are expected to reverse. In accordance with the Company’s income tax policy, significant or unusual items are separately recognized in the quarter in which they occur.

Revenue Recognition

The Company recognizes revenue from its services when it is probable that the economic benefits associated with the transactions will flow to the Company and the amount of revenue can be measured reliably. This is normally demonstrated when: (i) persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists; (ii) the fee is fixed or determinable; (iii) performance of service has been delivered; and (iv) collection is reasonably assured.

The Company provides Internet-based services to facilitate email deliverability, including bulk and transactional sending, reputation management, compliance auditing, abuse processing and diagnostics.  The Company’s services are offered over various contractual periods for a fixed fee that varies based on a maximum volume of transactions.  Revenues are typically paid by clients via credit card, check or wire payments at the inception of the contractual period.  Revenue is recognized on a straight-line basis over the contractual period.

The Company offers refunds on a pro-rata basis at any time during the contractual period.  The Company also experiences credit card chargebacks relating to cardholder disputes that are commonly experienced by businesses that accept credit cards.  The Company makes estimates for refunds and credit card chargebacks based on historical experience.

Net Income Per Share

Basic net income per share is computed using the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted net income per share is computed using the weighted average number of common shares and, if dilutive, potential common shares outstanding during the period.  For periods prior to March 31, 2011, the Company’s options and warrants to purchase shares of common stock were excluded from the calculation of net income per share because the average market price of the underlying shares during the period was not greater than the exercise price of the options.  

6

---

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

In October 2009, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2009-13, “Revenue Recognition (Topic 605): Multiple-Deliverable Revenue Arrangements—a consensus of the FASB Emerging Issues Task Force” (“ASU 2009-13”), which provides guidance on whether multiple deliverables exist, how the arrangement should be separated, and the consideration allocated. ASU 2009-13 requires an entity to allocate revenue in an arrangement using estimated selling prices of deliverables if a vendor does not have vendor-specific objective evidence or third-party evidence of selling price. ASU 2009-13 was effective for the first annual reporting period beginning on or after June 15, 2010 and could be applied retrospectively for all periods presented or prospectively to arrangements entered into or materially modified after the adoption date. Early adoption was permitted provided that the revised guidance was retroactively applied to the beginning of the year of adoption. ASU 2009-13 was effective for the Company on January 1, 2011. The adoption of these amendments did not have any impact on the consolidated financial statements.  

In May 2011, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2011-04, Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in U.S. GAAP and International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRSs”), which amends ASC 820, Fair Value Measurement. ASU 2011-04 does not extend the use of fair value accounting, but provides guidance on how it should be applied where its use is already required or permitted by other standards within U.S. GAAP or IFRSs. ASU 2011-04 changes the wording used to describe many requirements in U.S. GAAP for measuring fair value and for disclosing information about fair value measurements. Additionally, ASU 2011-04 clarifies the FASB’s intent about the application of existing fair value measurements. ASU 2011-04 is effective for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2011, and is applied prospectively.  The Company is in the process of evaluating the impact that the adoption of ASU 2011-04 will have on the financial statements.

In June 2011, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2011-05, “Presentation of Comprehensive Income” (ASU 2011-05). The provisions of ASU 2011-05 amend FASB ASC Topic 220 “Comprehensive Income” to eliminate the current option to present the components of other comprehensive income in the statement of changes in equity, and require the presentation of net income and other comprehensive income (and their respective components) either in a single continuous statement or in two separate but consecutive statements. The amendments do not alter any current recognition or measurement requirements with respect to items of other comprehensive income. ASU 2011-05 is effective for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2011, with early adoption permitted. The Company is in the process of evaluating the impact that the adoption of ASU 2011-05 will have on the financial statements.

Note 2:

Intangible Assets

Intangible assets that are subject to amortization are reviewed for potential impairment whenever events or circumstances indicate that carrying amounts may not be recoverable.  Impairment is determined to exist if the anticipated future cash flow attributable to the asset is less than its carrying value.  The asset is then reduced to the net present value of the anticipated future cash flow.  

Domain Name

Domain name represents the cost of an internet domain.  The cost is amortized on the straight-line method over its estimated useful life of fifteen (15) years.

		June 30, 2011		December 31, 2010
Cost basis		$ 9,000		$ 9,000
Less: accumulated amortization		(6,764)		(6,002)
		$ 2,236		$ 2,998

Amortization expense for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 was $334 and $762 respectively, and for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010 was $334 and $668, respectively.  Estimated amortization expense for each of the ensuing years through December 31, 2014 is $1,336 per year.

7

---

Software License

Software license represents an amount paid to a third party for use of their software.  The license will be amortized on the straight-line method over five (5) years.

		June 30, 2011		December 31, 2010
Cost basis		$ 100,000		$ -
Less: accumulated amortization		-		-
		$ 100,000		$ -

The Company has not amortized any of the licenses costs as of June 30, 2011.

Note 3:

Shareholders’ Equity

During February and March of 2011, the Company issued and sold 400,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at $0.25 per share.  The sale of the common stock resulted in gross proceeds of $100,000 and net proceeds of $96,816 to the Company after deducting offering costs of $3,184.  The Company has used a portion of, and intends to continue to use, the proceeds of their initial public offering for product development expenses.

Note 4:

Net Income Per Share

Computation of net income per share is as follows:

	Three Months Ended June 30,				Six Months Ended June 30,
	2011		2010		2011		2010
Net income (loss) attributable to SMTP.com	$ 202,927		$ 75,511		$ 360,289		$ 143,896
Basic and diluted weighted average common shares outstanding	13,840,264		13,440,000		13,703,743		13,440,000
Add incremental shares for:
Warrants	547,089				330,957
Stock options	1,097,552		-		851,313		-
Diluted weighted average common shares outstanding	15,484,904		13,440,000		14,886,013		13,440,000
Net income (loss) per share:
Basic	$ 0.01		$ 0.01		$ 0.03		$ 0.01
Diluted	$ 0.01		$ 0.01		$ 0.02		$ 0.01

Note 5:

Stock-Based Compensation

The Company has historically granted stock options to certain vendors and employees.  On January 26, 2011, the Company granted 384,000 stock options at a strike price of $0.25 that vest equally over a four year period.  The grant date fair value of the awards was $54,736 (net of estimated forfeitures of 10%) which was determined using a Black-Scholes option pricing model using the following assumptions:  volatility of 68%, risk-free rate of return of 2.4%, stock price of $0.25 and expected term of 6.25 years.  The options expire in 2021.

The volatility used was based on historical volatility of similar sized companies due to lack of historical data of the Company’s stock price.  The risk free interest rate was determined based on treasury securities with maturities equal to the expected term of the underlying award.  The expected term was determined based on the simplified method outlined in Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 110.

Stock option awards are expensed on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period.  During the three and six months ended June 30, 2011, the Company recognized expense of $11,662 and $25,288, respectively, associated with stock option awards.  There was no stock option expense recognized during the three and six months ended

8

---

June 30, 2010. At June 30, 2011, future stock compensation expense (net of estimated forfeitures) not yet recognized was $151,222 and will be recognized over a weighted average remaining vesting period of 1.6 years.  The following summarizes stock option activity for the six months ended June 30, 2011:

		Number of Units		Weighted- Average Exercise Price		Weighted- Average Fair Value		Weighted- Average Remaining Contractual Term (in years)
		960,000		$ 0.25		$ 0.16
Grants		384,000		0.25		0.16
Forfeitures		-		-		-
Exercises		-		-		-
		1,344,000		$ 0.25		$ 0.16		9.2
		183,333		$ 0.25		$ 0.16		9.0

The intrinsic value of the Company’s stock options outstanding was $1,478,900 at June 30, 2011.

Note 6:

Warrants

On March 23, 2011, in connection with a consulting agreement, the Company issued 800,000 warrants to purchase common stock at an exercise price of $0.625 per share with a term of 5 years.  The warrants were fully vested at the date of grant and the Company recognized an expense of $73,768 equal to the grant date fair value of the warrants using the following assumptions: volatility of 68%; risk-free interest rate of 2.07%; and expected term of 5 years.  The fair value of the warrants was determined using the Black-Scholes option valuation model. The warrants expire on March 23, 2016 and have a remaining contractual life of 4.73 years as of June 30, 2011.  There are no other warrants outstanding as of June 30, 2011.  The intrinsic value of the Company’s warrants outstanding was $580,000 at June 30, 2011.

Note 7:

Commitments and Contingencies

Litigation

The Company may from time to time be involved in legal proceedings arising from the normal course of business.  There are no pending or threatened legal proceedings as of June 30, 2011.

Operating Leases and Service Contracts

The Company rents its facilities on a month-to-month basis.  Most of its service contracts are also on a month-to-month basis.  However, the Company entered into a couple of noncancelable service contracts during the three months ended June 30, 2011.   Future minimum payments under noncancelable service contracts are as follows for the years ended December 31:

2011		$ 8,010
2012		16,020
2013		16,020
2014		5,905
2015		-
Thereafter		-
Total		$ 45,955

9

---

Note 8:

Related Party Transactions

Amounts Due to Shareholder

In February 2010, the Company provided a loan of $100,000 at an annualized interest rate of 3% to one of its shareholders.  The loan, plus $1,000 in interest, was repaid by the shareholder in July 2010.

Note 9:

Income Taxes

During the quarter ended June 30, 2011, the Company made certain true up entries to reflect the finalization of the tax return for the year ended December 31, 2010 and to adjust the effective tax rate on deferred tax assets.  The effects of these entries were to increase tax expense by $26,197 in the three and six months ended June 30, 2011.

10

---

Item 2.

Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

Except for the historical information contained in this report on Form 10-Q, the matters discussed herein are forward-looking statements. Words such as “anticipates,” “believes,” “expects,” “future,” and “intends,” and similar expressions are used to identify forward-looking statements. These and other statements regarding matters that are not historical are forward-looking statements. These matters involve risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those in the forward-looking statements. Factors that could cause or contribute to such differences in results and outcomes include without limitation those discussed below as well as those discussed elsewhere in this report. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which reflect management’s analysis only as of the date hereof. We assume no obligation to update these forward-looking statements to reflect actual results or changes in factors or assumptions affecting such forward-looking statements.  This information should also be read in conjunction with our audited historical financial statements which are included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 31, 2011.

Background Overview

 

We provide Internet-based services to facilitate email deliverability, including bulk and transactional sending, reputation management, compliance auditing, abuse processing and diagnostics. Our services provide customers with the ability to increase the deliverability of email with less time, cost and complexity than handling it themselves. We believe our growth since inception has been driven by the compelling value proposition for our services. Our stock is publicly traded on the Over-the-Counter Bulletin Board, under the trading symbol SMTP (OTCBB:SMTP).

Results of Operations

Net Revenues

		Net Revenues
		2011		2010		Change		Percent
Three Months Ended June 30,		$ 1,000,555		$ 616,240		$ 384,315		62%
Six Months Ended June 30,		$ 1,932,813		$ 1,182,579		$ 750,234		63%

Revenues increased for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 as compared to the three and six months ended June 30, 2010, due to increased sales of our email service products to consumers.  Revenue growth is attributable primarily to an increase in our number of subscribers of these products.  Most of this growth is attributable to organic growth in our customer base, specifically our larger business users who require dedicated computer and software systems and typically pay a higher average monthly fee.  

Cost of Services

		Cost of Services
		2011		2010		Change		Percent
Three Months Ended June 30,		$ 181,634		$ 159,979		$ 21,655		14%
Six Months Ended June 30,		$ 377,480		$ 313,039		$ 64,441		21%

Cost of services increased for the three months ended June 30, 2011 as compared to the three months ended June 30, 2010 primarily due to increased revenues.  As a percentage of revenues, cost of services were 18% and 20% of net revenues for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011, respectively, as compared to 26% and 26% for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010, respectively.  This decrease in cost of services as a percentage of revenues is due to decreased partner share commissions during 2011 as a lower volume of customers were provided by our resellers.  Also, there were subcontractor costs for customer technical support that occurred during the three and six months ended June 30, 2010 that did not occur during the three and six months ended June 30, 2011.  

11

---

Sales and Marketing

		Sales and Marketing
		2011		2010		Change		Percent
Three Months Ended June 30,		$ 83,429		$ 82,569		$ 860		1%
Six Months Ended June 30,		$ 154,234		$ 147,379		$ 6,855		5%

Sales and marketing expenses did not substantially change for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 as compared to the three and six months ended June 30, 2010.  Although we have been able to maintain our marketing budget, we have experienced substantial increases in our net revenues during the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 as compared to the three and six months ended June 30, 2010 due to improved marketing and sales strategies.   

General and Administrative

		General and Administrative
		2011		2010		Change		Percent
Three Months Ended June 30,		$ 248,676		$ 190,826		$ 57,850		30%
Six Months Ended June 30,		$ 567,046		$ 372,323		$ 194,723		52%

General and administrative expenses increased for the three months ended June 30, 2011 as compared to the three months ended June 30, 2010 based on the following:

 

·

An increase of approximately $37,000 in facilities and other general costs as we develop our infrastructure for future growth;

·

An increase of approximately $48,000 of professional services related to our newly acquired status as a publicly traded company;

·

An increase in stock compensation expense of approximately $12,000 related to stock options issued; partially offset by a

·

A decrease in payroll and related costs of approximately $38,000 as we have reduced payroll due to outsourcing arrangements and improvements in productivity.

Research and Development

		Research and Development
		2011		2010		Change		Percent
Three Months Ended June 30,		$ 102,862		$ 47,948		$ 54,914		115%
Six Months Ended June 30,		$ 178,857		$ 94,265		$ 84,592		90%

Research and development expenses increased for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 as compared to the three and six months ended June 30, 2010 as we utilized more subcontractors devoted to research and development.  Our research and development efforts are focused around expanding our service offerings and improving the functionality of our products.  

12

---

Provision for Income Tax

		Provision for Income Tax
		2011		2010		Change		Percent
Three Months Ended June 30,		$ 181,286		$ 59,407		$ 121,879		205%
Six Months Ended June 30,		$ 295,350		$ 111,677		$ 183,673		164%

Changes in our income tax expense related primarily to an increase in pretax income.  Our effective tax rate was 47% and 45% during the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 as compared to 44% and 44% during the three and six months ended June 30, 2010.  The increase in effective tax rates are due to true-ups to our income tax returns that were filed during the three months ended June 30, 2011.   

Net Income

		Net Income
		2011		2010		Change		Percent
Three Months Ended June 30,		$ 202,927		$ 75,511		$ 127,416		169%
Six Months Ended June 30,		$ 360,289		$ 143,896		$ 216,393		150%

Net income increased for the three and six months  ended June 30, 2011 as compared to the three and six months ended June 30, 2010, respectively, primarily due to revenue growth partially offset by increases in cost of services, operating expenses and income taxes related to the growth in our business, each of which is described above.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Our primary source of cash inflows are net remittances from customers for email services.  Such payments are typically received in advance of providing the services, yielding a deferred revenue liability on our balance sheet.  

Our primary sources of cash outflows include payroll, income tax payments and payments to vendors and third party service providers.  With the exception of income taxes, which occur on a periodic basis, cash outflows typically occur in close proximity of expense recognition.  

Net cash generated by operating activities increased approximately $278,000, or 237%, to $394,873 for the six months ended June 30, 2011, compared to $117,183 for the six months ended June 30, 2010.  The increase of cash generated by operating activities was attributable to an increase in net income of $216,000 and an increase in noncash charges of approximately $95,000, partially offset by $38,000 in reductions in working capital and other net operating assets.

  

Net cash used in investing activities was $(148,225) and $(3,164) during the six months ended June 30, 2011, and 2010, respectively, consisting of investments in computers, servers, other equipment and licensed software.  

Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities was $96,816 and $(100,000) during the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively.  During February and March of 2011, we issued and sold 400,000 shares of our common stock and received net proceeds of $96,816 after deducting offering costs of $3,184.  In February 2010, we provided a loan of $100,000 to one of our shareholders.  The loan was repaid by the shareholder in July 2010.

We had net working capital of $670,660 and $220,940 as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively.  Our increase in net working capital from December 31, 2010 to June 30, 2011  primarily attributable to our increased cash, which increased to $934,527 at June 30, 2011 compared to $591,063 at December 31, 2010 and our reduced accrued liabilities, which decreased to $25,675 at June 30, 2011 compared to $172,282 at December 31, 2010.

13

---

Off-balance sheet arrangements

We did not have any off-balance sheet arrangements at June 30, 2011 or December 31, 2010.

Item 3.

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure About Market Risk

Not applicable.

Item 4.

Controls and Procedures.  

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures.  The Company’s management, with the participation of the Company’s Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer, evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) as of June 30, 2011.  Based on this evaluation, the Company’s Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer concluded that, as of June 30, 2011 the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective, in that they provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports that it files or submits under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms, and is accumulated and communicated to the Company’s management, including the Company’s Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

This quarterly report does not include a report of management’s assessment regarding internal control over financial reporting due to a transition period established by rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission for newly public companies.

PART II – OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1.

Legal Proceedings.

Not applicable.

Item 1A. Risk Factors.

Not applicable.

Item 2.

Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.

Not applicable.

Item 3.

Defaults Upon Senior Securities.

Not applicable.

Item 4.

Removed and Reserved.

Not applicable.

Item 5.

Other Information.

Not applicable.

14

---

Item 6.

Exhibits.

INDEX TO EXHIBITS
SEC Reference Number	Title of Document	Location
3.1	Articles of Incorporation	*
3.2	Bylaws	*
3.3	Plan of Merger	*
10.1	2010 Stock Incentive Plan	*
31.1	Certification of Principal Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002	Filed herewith
31.2	Certification of Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002	Filed herewith
32.1	Certification of Principal Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002	Filed herewith
32.2	Certification of Principal Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002	Filed herewith
101.	The following financial information from SMTP, Inc.'s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2011, formatted in XBRL (eXtensible Business Reporting Language): (i) Condensed Balance Sheets (ii) Condensed Statements of Operations (iii) Condensed Statements of Cash Flows, and (iv) the Notes to Condensed Financial Statements.	Filed herewith

*Incorporated by reference to Registration Statement on Form S-1 filed on December 2, 2010.

All other Exhibits called for by Rule 601 of Regulation S-K are not applicable to this filing. Information pertaining to our common stock is contained in our Certificate of Incorporation and By-Laws.

15

---

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

Dated:  August 2, 2011

Dated:  August 2, 2011

16