HOMEFED CORP - FORM 10-Q

Attached files

file	filename
EXCEL - IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT - HOMEFED CORP	Financial_Report.xls
EX-32.2 - ERIN N. RUHE EXHIBIT 32.2 - HOMEFED CORP	ruheexhibit322.htm
EX-31.2 - ERIN N. RUHE EXHIBIT 31.2 - HOMEFED CORP	ruheexhibit312.htm
EX-32.1 - PAUL J. BORDEN EXHIBIT 32.1 - HOMEFED CORP	bordenexhibit321.htm
EX-31.1 - PAUL J. BORDEN EXHIBIT 31.1 - HOMEFED CORP	bordenexhibit311.htm

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

__________

FORM 10-Q

[X] QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2011

[ ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from to

Commission File Number 1-10153

HOMEFED CORPORATION

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its Charter)

Delaware (State or other jurisdiction of	33-0304982 (I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization)	Identification Number)
1903 Wright Place, Suite 220, Carlsbad, California (Address of principal executive offices)	92008 (Zip Code)

(760) 918-8200

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

N/A

(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)

______________________

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

YES X NO _____

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this Chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).

YES X NO _____

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer o		Accelerated filer x
Non-accelerated filer o	(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)	Smaller reporting company o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

YES _____ NO X

APPLICABLE ONLY TO CORPORATE ISSUERS:

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date. On July 25, 2011, there were 7,879,500 outstanding shares of the Registrant’s Common Stock, par value $.01 per share.


Part I -FINANCIAL INFORMATION


Item 1. Financial Statements.

HOMEFED CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Balance Sheets
June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010
(Dollars in thousands, except par value)

	June 30,			December 31,
	2011			2010
	(Unaudited)

ASSETS
Real estate	$	98,101		$	87,909
Cash and cash equivalents		23,722			43,788
Investments available for sale (amortized cost of $43,290 and $38,282)		43,296			38,287
Accounts receivable, deposits and other assets		2,133			1,219
Net deferred tax asset		13,402			13,307

TOTAL	$	180,654		$	184,510

LIABILITIES
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities	$	2,125		$	3,940
Non-refundable option payments		1,850			650
Liability for environmental remediation		9,311			9,652
Income taxes payable		-			1,902
Other liabilities		258			254

		13,544			16,398

COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

EQUITY
Common stock, $.01 par value; 25,000,000 shares authorized;
7,879,500 shares outstanding, after deducting 395,409 shares held in treasury		79			79
Additional paid-in capital		376,226			376,110
Accumulated other comprehensive income		4			3
Accumulated deficit		(224,539	)		(223,197	)
Total HomeFed Corporation common shareholders' equity		151,770			152,995
Noncontrolling interest		15,340			15,117
Total equity		167,110			168,112

TOTAL	$	180,654		$	184,510


See notes to interim consolidated financial statements.


HOMEFED CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Statements of Operations
For the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2011 and 2010
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
(Unaudited)

	For the Three Month						For the Six Month
	Period Ended June 30,						Period Ended June 30,
	2011			2010			2011			2010

REVENUES
Sales of real estate	$	420		$	1,257		$	7,420		$	3,236
Co-op marketing and advertising fees		48			-			80			-
		468			1,257			7,500			3,236

EXPENSES
Cost of sales		380			1,070			4,019			2,685
General and administrative expenses		1,829			2,283			4,202			4,194
Administrative services fees to Leucadia National
Corporation		45			45			90			90
		2,254			3,398			8,311			6,969

Loss from operations		(1,786	)		(2,141	)		(811	)		(3,733	)

Interest and other income (expense), net		(531	)		(434	)		(1,051	)		(1,009	)

Loss before income taxes and noncontrolling interest		(2,317	)		(2,575	)		(1,862	)		(4,742	)
Income tax benefit		936			1,042			743			1,918

Net loss		(1,381	)		(1,533	)		(1,119	)		(2,824	)
Net income (loss) attributable to the noncontrolling
interest		(95	)		(86	)		223			18

Net loss attributable to HomeFed Corporation
common shareholders	$	(1,286	)	$	(1,447	)	$	(1,342	)	$	(2,842	)

Basic and diluted loss per common share
attributable to HomeFed Corporation common shareholders	$	(0.16	)	$	(0.18	)	$	(0.17	)	$	(0.36	)
















See notes to interim consolidated financial statements.


HOMEFED CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Equity
For the six month periods ended June 30, 2011 and 2010
(In thousands, except par value)
(Unaudited)

	HomeFed Corporation Common Shareholders
	Common				Accumulated
	Stock		Additional		Other
	$.01 Par		Paid-In		Comprehensive			Accumulated						Noncontrolling
	Value		Capital		Income			Deficit			Subtotal			Interest		Total

Balance, January 1, 2010	$	79	$	375,917	$	43		$	(226,726	)	$	149,313		$	14,226	$	163,539

Comprehensive loss:
Net change in unrealized gain (loss)
on investments, net of tax benefit of $26						(39	)					(39	)				(39	)
Net loss									(2,842	)		(2,842	)		18		(2,824	)
Comprehensive loss												(2,881	)		18		(2,863	)
Share-based compensation expense				75								75					75

Balance, June 30, 2010	$	79	$	375,992	$	4		$	(229,568	)	$	146,507		$	14,244	$	160,751

Balance, January 1, 2011	$	79	$	376,110	$	3		$	(223,197	)	$	152,995		$	15,117	$	168,112

Comprehensive loss:
Net change in unrealized gain (loss)
on investments, net of tax benefit of $0						1						1					1
Net loss									(1,342	)		(1,342	)		223		(1,119	)
Comprehensive loss												(1,341	)		223		(1,118	)
Share-based compensation expense				116								116					116

Balance, June 30, 2011	$	79	$	376,226	$	4		$	(224,539	)	$	151,770		$	15,340	$	167,110


See notes to interim consolidated financial statements.


HOMEFED CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
For the six month periods ended June 30, 2011 and 2010
(In thousands)
(Unaudited)

	2011			2010
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:

Net loss	$	(1,119	)	$	(2,824	)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used for operating activities:
Benefit for deferred income taxes		(95	)		(1,471	)
Share-based compensation expense		116			75
Depreciation and amortization of property, equipment and leasehold improvements		122			131
Net securities gains		-			(1	)
Accretion of discount on investments available for sale		(32	)		(79	)
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Real estate		758			(221	)
Accounts receivable, deposits and other assets		(37	)		(487	)
Non-refundable option payments		1,200			-
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities		(1,815	)		17
Liability for environmental remediation		(341	)		(152	)
Income taxes receivable/payable		(2,851	)		(911	)
Other liabilities		4			101
Net cash used for operating activities		(4,090	)		(5,822	)

CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Acquisition of real estate		(11,000	)		-
Purchases of investments (other than short-term)		(43,276	)		(65,743	)
Proceeds from maturities of investments-available for sale		38,300			67,020
Proceeds from sale of investments		-			14,197
Net cash provided by (used for) investing activities		(15,976	)		15,474

Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents		(20,066	)		9,652

Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period		43,788			9,127

Cash and cash equivalents, end of period	$	23,722		$	18,779

Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information:
Cash paid for interest (net of amounts capitalized)	$	-		$	-
Cash paid for income taxes	$	2,200		$	443

See notes to interim consolidated financial statements.

HOMEFED CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Interim Consolidated Financial Statements

1. Significant Accounting Policies

The unaudited interim consolidated financial statements, which reflect all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring items or items discussed herein) that management believes necessary to fairly state results of interim operations, should be read in conjunction with the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (including the Summary of Significant Accounting Policies) included in the Company’s audited consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2010, which are included in the Company’s Annual Report filed on Form 10-K for such year (the “2010 10-K”). Results of operations for interim periods are not necessarily indicative of annual results of operations. The consolidated balance sheet at December 31, 2010 was extracted from the Company’s audited annual financial statements and does not include all disclosures required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) for annual financial statements.

In April 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued guidance to improve the accounting for repurchase agreements and other agreements that both entitle and obligate a transferor to repurchase or redeem financial assets before their maturity. The amendments remove from the assessment of effective control the criterion requiring the transferor to have the ability to repurchase or redeem the financial assets on substantially the agreed terms, even in the event of default by the transferee, and the collateral maintenance implementation guidance related to that criterion. The guidance, which is effective for the first interim or annual period beginning on or after December 15, 2011, is not expected to have a significant impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In May 2011, the FASB issued guidance to improve the comparability of fair value measurements presented and disclosed in financial statements issued in accordance with GAAP and International Financial Reporting Standards. The amendment includes requirements for measuring fair value and for disclosing information about fair value measurements, but does not require additional fair value measurements and is not intended to establish valuation standards or affect valuation practices outside of financial reporting. The guidance, which is effective during interim or annual periods beginning after December 15, 2011, is not expected to have a significant impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In June 2011, the FASB issued amended guidance on the presentation of comprehensive income. This amendment eliminates the current option to report other comprehensive income and its components in the statement of changes in equity; instead, it requires the presentation of comprehensive income, the components of net income and the components of other comprehensive income either in a single continuous statement of comprehensive income or in two separate but consecutive statements. This amendment, which must be applied retrospectively, is effective for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2011, and early adoption is permitted. Adoption of this amendment will change the presentation of the Company’s consolidated financial statements but will not have any impact on its consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

Certain amounts for prior periods have been reclassified to be consistent with the 2011 presentation.

2.	Income Taxes

The aggregate amount of unrecognized tax benefits related to uncertain tax positions reflected in the Company’s consolidated balance sheet at June 30, 2011 was $150,000 (including $60,000 for interest); if recognized, such amounts would lower the Company’s effective tax rate. Unrecognized tax benefits were not materially different at December 31, 2010. Over the next twelve months, the Company believes it is reasonably possible that the liability for unrecognized tax benefits will decrease by an additional $150,000 upon the expiration of the statute of limitations. The statute of limitations with respect to the Company’s federal income tax returns has expired for all years through 2006, and with respect to California state income tax returns through 2005.

3.	Loss Per Common Share

Basic and diluted loss per share amounts were calculated by dividing net loss by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding. The numerators and denominators used to calculate basic and diluted loss per share for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 are as follows (in thousands):

	For the three months						For the six months
	ended June 30,						ended June 30,
	2011			2010			2011			2010
Numerator – net loss attributable to HomeFed Corporation common shareholders	$	(1,286	)	$	(1,447	)	$	(1,342	)	$	(2,842	)

Denominator for basic and diluted loss per share– weighted average shares		7,880			7,880			7,880			7,880

For the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, there is no difference between basic and diluted loss per share amounts because the effect of increasing the weighted average number of common shares for incremental shares issuable upon exercise of outstanding options is antidilutive.

4.	Related Party Transactions

Pursuant to an administrative services agreement, Leucadia National Corporation (“Leucadia”) provides administrative and accounting services, including providing the services of the Company’s Secretary. Administrative services fee expenses were $45,000 and $90,000 for each of the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. The administrative services agreement automatically renews for successive annual periods unless terminated in accordance with its terms. The Company subleases office space to Leucadia under a sublease agreement until February 2013. Amounts reflected in other income pursuant to this agreement were $3,000 for each of the three month periods ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, and $6,000 for each of the six month periods ended June 30, 2011 and 2010.

5.	Interest and Other Income (Expense), net

Interest and other income (expense), net includes interest income of $50,000 and $70,000 for the three month periods ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively, and $130,000 and $160,000 for the six month periods ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively.

Rental income aggregated $110,000 for each of the three month periods ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, and $210,000 and $190,000 for the six month periods ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively.

Farming expenses, net at the Rampage property were $700,000 and $650,000 for the three month periods ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively, and $1,550,000 and $1,400,000 for the six month periods ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively.

6.	Financial Instruments

The Company’s material financial instruments include cash and cash equivalents and investments classified as available for sale; investments classified as available for sale are the only assets or liabilities that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis. All of the Company’s investments mature in one year or less. The par value, amortized cost, gross unrealized gains and losses and estimated fair value of investments classified as available for sale as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 are as follows (in thousands):

									Fair Value Measurements Using

									Quoted Prices in		Significant
									Active Markets		Other
					Gross		Gross		for Identical		Observable		Total
	Par		Amortized		Unrealized		Unrealized		Assets		Inputs		Fair Value
	Value		Cost		Gains		Losses		(Level 1)		(Level 2)		Measurements

June 30, 2011
U.S. Treasury securities	$	43,300	$	43,290	$	6	$	-	$	43,296	$	-	$	43,296

December 31, 2010
U.S. Treasury securities	$	38,300	$	38,282	$	5	$	-	$	38,287	$	-	$	38,287

As of June 30, 2011, the Company did not have any assets or liabilities measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis. As more fully discussed in the 2010 10-K, during the fourth quarter of 2010 the Company recorded an impairment charge for certain real estate assets at the San Elijo Hills Towncenter (“Towncenter”) which reduced the carrying amount of those assets to their fair value of $1,200,000 at December 31, 2010.

For cash and cash equivalents, the carrying amounts of such financial instruments approximate their fair values.

The Company does not invest in any derivatives or engage in any hedging activities.

7.	Real Estate Acquisitions

In January 2011, the Company acquired in a foreclosure sale the Fanita Ranch property, a 2,600 acre parcel of vacant land located in Santee, California. The aggregate purchase price of $12,350,000 consisted of cash consideration of $11,000,000 and the assumption of certain payables. Fanita Ranch is partially entitled for approximately 1,400 residential units. The Company acquired the property with the intention of completing the necessary entitlements to develop the property as a master-planned community, although there can be no assurance that the Company will be successful in these efforts. If successful, obtaining all the entitlements is expected to take several years.

8.	Real Estate Sales Agreements

During the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2011, the Company sold one residential condominium unit at the Towncenter for gross cash proceeds of $400,000 and recognized a gain of $40,000. During the six month period ended June 30, 2011, the Company sold 32 single family lots at San Elijo Hills to a homebuilder for aggregate cash proceeds of $7,000,000, pursuant to which it had previously received a non-refundable option payment of $650,000 in 2009, and recognized a gain of $3,350,000.

During the three and six month period ended June 30, 2010, the Company sold three residential condominium units at the Towncenter for gross cash proceeds of $1,250,000 and recognized a gain of $200,000. During the six month period ended June 30, 2010, the Company sold seven residential condominium units at the Towncenter for gross cash proceeds of $3,250,000 and recognized a gain of $550,000.

In July 2011, the Company sold a Towncenter commercial lot to a bank for cash proceeds of $1,400,000, and will recognize a gain of $1,150,000 during the third quarter of 2011.

As of July 25, 2011, the Company has entered into agreements to sell 59 single family residential lots to a homebuilder for cash proceeds of $17,750,000, and to sell a Towncenter commercial lot to a daycare operator for cash proceeds of $550,000, both of which have not closed. During the second quarter of 2011, the Company received non-refundable option deposits of $1,800,000 from the homebuilder and $50,000 from the buyer of the Towncenter commercial lot. These option payments are non-refundable if the Company fulfills its obligations under the agreements, and will be applied to reduce the amount due from the purchaser at closing. Although these agreements are binding on the purchasers, should the Company fulfill its obligations under the agreements within the specified timeframes and the purchasers decide not to close, the Company’s recourse will be primarily limited to retaining the option payments.

9.	Litigation

As previously disclosed, in June 2009, a lawsuit entitled Walter E. Wolf v. Paul J. Borden, et al. was filed against the Company, its President and certain affiliates of the Company by a minority stockholder of the Company's subsidiary, CDS Devco, Inc. The action alleges, among other things, breach of fiduciary duty, fraud, breach of contract and intentional interference with contract and seeks unspecified monetary damages and other relief.

In March 2010, the Court dismissed certain of the plaintiff’s claims and on April 11, 2011, the Court granted summary judgment in favor of all defendants on all remaining claims. Judgment was entered in favor of the Company and all of its officers and affiliates on May 26, 2011. On July 22, 2011, the plaintiff served a notice of appeal. The Company believes that the judgment should be affirmed on appeal and will continue to vigorously defend itself.

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Interim Operations.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

For the six month periods ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, net cash was used for operating activities, principally for real estate expenditures at the San Elijo Hills and Otay Ranch projects, general and administrative expenses, farming operations at the Rampage property and estimated federal and state tax payments. The Company’s principal sources of funds are proceeds from the sale of real estate, fee income from the San Elijo Hills project, dividends and tax sharing payments from its subsidiaries, borrowings from or repayment of advances by its subsidiaries and cash and cash equivalents and investments. As of June 30, 2011, the Company had aggregate cash, cash equivalents and investments of $67,000,000 to meet its current liquidity needs and for future investment opportunities.

As of June 30, 2011, the remaining land at the San Elijo Hills project to be developed and sold or leased consisted of the following (including real estate under contract for sale or real estate sold subsequent to June 30, 2011):

Single family lots			325
Multi-family units			30
Square footage of commercial space			51,200

In July 2011, the Company sold a Towncenter commercial lot to a bank for cash proceeds of $1,400,000, and will recognize a gain of $1,150,000 during the third quarter of 2011.

As more fully discussed in the 2010 10-K, residential property sales volume, prices and new building starts have declined significantly in many U.S. markets, including California and the greater San Diego region, which have negatively affected sales and profits at the San Elijo Hills project. The slowdown in residential sales has been exacerbated by the turmoil in the mortgage lending and credit markets, which has resulted in stricter lending standards and reduced liquidity for prospective home buyers. Sales of new homes and re-sales of existing homes have declined substantially from the early years of the project’s development.

The Company has substantially completed development of all of its remaining residential single family lots at the San Elijo Hills project, many of which are “premium” lots which are expected to command premium prices if, and when, the market fully recovers. Although recent homebuilder interest and sales activity in the project are encouraging, it is too soon to determine if the long slump in the housing market is coming to an end, or when the Company will be able to sell its remaining inventory. The Company believes that by exercising patience and waiting for market conditions to improve it can best maximize shareholder value with its remaining residential lot inventory. However, on an ongoing basis the Company evaluates the local real estate market and economic conditions in general, and updates its expectations of future market conditions as it continues to assess the best time to market its remaining residential lot inventory for sale.

The Towncenter includes multi-family residential units and commercial space, which are being constructed in phases. The Company has completed construction of the first phase of the Towncenter, which includes 12 residential condominium units and 11,000 square feet of commercial space. Ten of the twelve condominium units have been sold. The Company has entered into leases for seven of the nine phase one retail spaces covering 8,800 square feet; all of the tenants have opened for business. The Company is currently evaluating design options for phase two of the Towncenter.

Results of Operations

Real Estate Sales Activity

San Elijo Hills Project:

During the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, the Company closed on sales of real estate and recognized revenues as follows:

	For the three month periods ended				For the six month periods ended
	June 30, 2011		June 30, 2010		June 30, 2011		June 30, 2010

Single family units		-		-		32		-
Multi-family units		-		-		-		-
Residential condominium units		1		3		1		7
Sales price	$	400,000	$	1,250,000	$	7,400,000	$	3,250,000

During the three month periods ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, cost of sales of real estate aggregated $400,000 and $1,050,000, respectively, and during the six month periods ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, cost of sales of real estate aggregated $4,000,000 and $2,700,000, respectively.

Otay Ranch Project:

There was no real estate sales activity at the Otay Ranch project during the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010. As discussed in the 2010 10-K, the Company continues to evaluate how to maximize the value of this investment while pursuing land sales and processing further entitlements on portions of its property. The Otay Ranch Project is in the early stages of development; as a result, the Company does not expect any sales activity in the near future.

Other Results of Operations Activity

The Company recorded co-op marketing and advertising fees of $50,000 and $80,000 for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2011, respectively. There were no co-op marketing and advertising fees recorded during the three month and six month periods ended June 30, 2010. The Company records these fees when the San Elijo Hills project builders sell homes, and are generally based upon a fixed percentage of the homes’ selling price. These fees provide the Company with funds to conduct its marketing activities.

General and administrative expenses decreased during the three month period ended June 30, 2011 as compared to the same period in 2010 primarily due to lower legal expenses. Legal expenses decreased by $400,000 principally due to lower legal fees associated with litigation brought by a minority shareholder against one of the Company's subsidiaries related to the San Elijo Hills project, as well as lower legal fees related to corporate matters and decreased litigation activity at the Otay Ranch project.

The change in interest and other income (expense), net for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2011 as compared to the same periods in 2010 primarily reflects an increase in farming expenses at the Rampage property of $50,000 and $150,000 for the three and six month 2011 periods, respectively, resulting from increased vineyard rejuvenation, replanting and repairs, and for the six month 2011 period $150,000 of income relating to proceeds received from the settlement of a contract dispute.

The Company’s effective income tax rate is higher than the federal statutory rate due to California state income taxes.

Cautionary Statement for Forward-Looking Information

Statements included in this Report may contain forward-looking statements. Such statements may relate, but are not limited, to projections of revenues, income or loss, development expenditures, plans for growth and future operations, competition and regulation, as well as assumptions relating to the foregoing. Such forward-looking statements are made pursuant to the safe-harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995.

Forward-looking statements are inherently subject to risks and uncertainties, many of which cannot be predicted or quantified. When used in this Report, the words “estimates,” “expects,” “anticipates,” “believes,” “plans,” “intends” and variations of such words and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. Future events and actual results could differ materially from those set forth in, contemplated by or underlying the forward-looking statements.

Factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from any results projected, forecasted, estimated or budgeted or may materially and adversely affect the Company’s actual results include but are not limited to the following: the performance of the real estate industry in general; changes in mortgage interest rate levels or changes in consumer lending practices that reduce demand for housing; recent turmoil in the mortgage lending markets; the economic strength of the Southern California region where our business is currently concentrated; changes in domestic laws and government regulations or in the implementation and/or enforcement of government rules and regulations; demographic changes in the United States generally and California in particular that reduce the demand for housing; increases in real estate taxes and other local government fees; significant competition from other real estate developers and homebuilders; delays in construction schedules and cost overruns; increased costs for land, materials and labor; imposition of limitations on our ability to develop our properties resulting from condemnations, environmental laws and regulations and developments in or new applications thereof; earthquakes, fires and other natural disasters where our properties are located; construction defect liability on structures we build or that are built on land that we develop; our ability to insure certain risks economically; shortages of adequate water resources and reliable energy sources in the areas where we own real estate projects; changes in the composition of our assets and liabilities through acquisitions or divestitures; the actual cost of environmental liabilities concerning our land could exceed liabilities recorded; opposition from local community or political groups at our development projects; and our ability to generate sufficient taxable income to fully realize our deferred tax asset. For additional information see Part I, Item 1A. Risk Factors in the 2010 10-K.

Undue reliance should not be placed on these forward-looking statements, which are applicable only as of the date hereof. The Company undertakes no obligation to revise or update these forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances that arise after the date of this Report or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events.

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.

Information required under this Item is contained in Item 7A of the 2010 10-K, and is incorporated by reference herein.

Item 4. Controls and Procedures.

The Company’s management evaluated, with the participation of the Company’s principal executive and principal financial officers, the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”)), as of June 30, 2011. Based on their evaluation, the Company’s principal executive and principal financial officers concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of June 30, 2011.

There has been no change in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) that occurred during the Company’s fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2011, that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

PART II – OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings.

For a description of our legal proceedings, see Note 9 Litigation in the notes to the interim consolidated financial statements in Item 1 of Part I of this Form 10-Q, which is incorporated herein by reference.

Item 6. Exhibits.

31.1

Certification of President pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

31.2

Certification of Vice President, Treasurer and Controller pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

32.1

Certification of Principal Executive Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

32.2

Certification of Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

101

Financial statements from the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of HomeFed Corporation for the quarter ended June 30, 2011, formatted in Extensible Business Reporting Language (XBRL): (i) the Consolidated Balance Sheets, (ii) the Consolidated Statements of Operations, (iii) the Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders Equity, (iv) the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, and (v) the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, tagged as blocks of text.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

	HOMEFED CORPORATION
		(Registrant)

Date: July 28, 2011	By:	/s/ Erin N. Ruhe
		Name: Erin N. Ruhe
		Title: Vice President, Treasurer and Controller
		(Principal Accounting Officer)

EXHIBIT INDEX

Exhibit Number Description