HSBC
Finance Corporation
EXHIBIT 99.01
Report of
Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The Board of Directors and Shareholder
HSBC Finance Corporation:
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of
HSBC Finance Corporation, an indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of
HSBC Holdings plc, and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2010
and 2009 and the related consolidated statements of income
(loss), changes in shareholders equity, and cash flows for
each of the years in the three-year period ended
December 31, 2010. These consolidated financial statements
are the responsibility of HSBC Finance Corporations
management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these
consolidated financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are
free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining on a
test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in
the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the
accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial
statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a
reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred
to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial
position of HSBC Finance Corporation and subsidiaries as of
December 31, 2010 and 2009, and the results of their
operations and their cash flows for each of the years in the
three-year period ended December 31, 2010 in conformity
with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), HSBC
Finance Corporations internal control over financial
reporting as of December 31, 2010, based on criteria
established in Internal Control Integrated
Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring
Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO), and our report
dated February 28, 2011 expressed an unqualified opinion on
the effectiveness of HSBC Finance Corporations internal
control over financial reporting.
Chicago, Illinois
February 28, 2011, except as to Note 24
which is as of May 27, 2011
1
HSBC Finance Corporation
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENT OF INCOME (LOSS)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
|
Finance and other interest income
|
|
$
|
7,208
|
|
|
$
|
8,887
|
|
|
$
|
13,616
|
|
Interest expense on debt held by:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
HSBC affiliates
|
|
|
147
|
|
|
|
246
|
|
|
|
499
|
|
Non-affiliates
|
|
|
2,876
|
|
|
|
3,583
|
|
|
|
5,181
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income
|
|
|
4,185
|
|
|
|
5,058
|
|
|
|
7,936
|
|
Provision for credit losses
|
|
|
6,180
|
|
|
|
9,650
|
|
|
|
12,410
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income (loss) after provision for credit
losses
|
|
|
(1,995
|
)
|
|
|
(4,592
|
)
|
|
|
(4,474
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Insurance revenue
|
|
|
274
|
|
|
|
334
|
|
|
|
417
|
|
Investment income
|
|
|
99
|
|
|
|
109
|
|
|
|
124
|
|
Net
other-than-temporary
impairment
losses(1)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(25
|
)
|
|
|
(54
|
)
|
Derivative related income (expense)
|
|
|
(379
|
)
|
|
|
300
|
|
|
|
(306
|
)
|
Gain (loss) on debt designated at fair value and related
derivatives
|
|
|
741
|
|
|
|
(2,125
|
)
|
|
|
3,160
|
|
Fee income
|
|
|
188
|
|
|
|
650
|
|
|
|
1,687
|
|
Enhancement services revenue
|
|
|
404
|
|
|
|
484
|
|
|
|
700
|
|
Gain on bulk receivable sales to HSBC affiliates
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Gain on receivable sales to HSBC affiliates
|
|
|
540
|
|
|
|
469
|
|
|
|
260
|
|
Servicing and other fees from HSBC affiliates
|
|
|
666
|
|
|
|
748
|
|
|
|
545
|
|
Lower of cost or fair value adjustment on receivables held for
sale
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
(374
|
)
|
|
|
(514
|
)
|
Other income (expense)
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
92
|
|
|
|
(68
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other revenues
|
|
|
2,567
|
|
|
|
712
|
|
|
|
5,951
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salaries and employee benefits
|
|
|
597
|
|
|
|
1,119
|
|
|
|
1,594
|
|
Occupancy and equipment expenses, net
|
|
|
92
|
|
|
|
182
|
|
|
|
238
|
|
Other marketing expenses
|
|
|
314
|
|
|
|
184
|
|
|
|
350
|
|
Real estate owned expenses
|
|
|
274
|
|
|
|
199
|
|
|
|
342
|
|
Other servicing and administrative expenses
|
|
|
814
|
|
|
|
947
|
|
|
|
1,020
|
|
Support services from HSBC affiliates
|
|
|
1,092
|
|
|
|
925
|
|
|
|
922
|
|
Amortization of intangibles
|
|
|
143
|
|
|
|
157
|
|
|
|
178
|
|
Goodwill and other intangible asset impairment charges
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
2,308
|
|
|
|
329
|
|
Policyholders benefits
|
|
|
152
|
|
|
|
197
|
|
|
|
199
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses
|
|
|
3,478
|
|
|
|
6,218
|
|
|
|
5,172
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from continuing operations before income tax benefit
|
|
|
(2,906
|
)
|
|
|
(10,098
|
)
|
|
|
(3,695
|
)
|
Income tax benefit
|
|
|
1,007
|
|
|
|
2,632
|
|
|
|
1,087
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from continuing operations
|
|
|
(1,899
|
)
|
|
|
(7,466
|
)
|
|
|
(2,608
|
)
|
Discontinued Operations (Note 3);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) gain from discontinued operations before income tax
|
|
|
(26
|
)
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
(227
|
)
|
Income tax benefit (expense)
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) income from discontinued operations
|
|
|
(17
|
)
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
(175
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
$
|
(1,916
|
)
|
|
$
|
(7,450
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2,783
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
During 2009, $36 million of
gross
other-than-temporary
impairment losses on securities
available-for-sale
were recognized, of which $11 million was recognized in
accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) (AOCI).
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated
financial statements.
2
HSBC Finance Corporation
CONSOLIDATED
BALANCE SHEET
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions,
|
|
|
|
except share data)
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
$
|
175
|
|
|
$
|
289
|
|
Interest bearing deposits with banks
|
|
|
1,016
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
Securities purchased under agreements to resell
|
|
|
4,311
|
|
|
|
2,850
|
|
Securities
available-for-sale
|
|
|
3,371
|
|
|
|
3,187
|
|
Receivables, net (including $6.3 billion and
$6.8 billion at December 31, 2010 and 2009,
respectively, collateralizing long-term debt)
|
|
|
61,333
|
|
|
|
74,308
|
|
Receivables held for sale
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
Intangible assets, net
|
|
|
605
|
|
|
|
748
|
|
Properties and equipment, net
|
|
|
202
|
|
|
|
201
|
|
Real estate owned
|
|
|
962
|
|
|
|
592
|
|
Derivative financial assets
|
|
|
75
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Deferred income taxes, net
|
|
|
2,491
|
|
|
|
2,887
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
1,791
|
|
|
|
4,563
|
|
Assets of discontinued operations
|
|
|
196
|
|
|
|
4,908
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
76,532
|
|
|
$
|
94,553
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Due to affiliates (including $436 million at
December 31, 2010 carried at fair value)
|
|
$
|
8,255
|
|
|
$
|
9,043
|
|
Commercial paper
|
|
|
3,156
|
|
|
|
4,291
|
|
Long-term debt (including $20.8 billion and
$26.7 billion at December 31, 2010 and 2009,
respectively, carried at fair value and $4.1 billion and
$4.7 billion at December 31, 2010 and 2009,
respectively, collateralized by receivables)
|
|
|
54,616
|
|
|
|
68,880
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total debt
|
|
|
66,027
|
|
|
|
82,214
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Insurance policy and claim reserves
|
|
|
982
|
|
|
|
996
|
|
Derivative related liabilities
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
60
|
|
Liability for postretirement benefits
|
|
|
265
|
|
|
|
268
|
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
1,519
|
|
|
|
1,822
|
|
Liabilities of discontinued operations
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
814
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
68,812
|
|
|
|
86,174
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Redeemable preferred stock:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Series B (1,501,100 shares authorized, $0.01 par
value, 575,000 shares issued)
|
|
|
575
|
|
|
|
575
|
|
Series C (1,000 shares authorized, $0.01 par
value, 1,000 shares issued)
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Common shareholders equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock ($0.01 par value, 100 shares authorized;
66 shares and 65 shares issued at December 31,
2010 and 2009, respectively)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
23,321
|
|
|
|
23,119
|
|
Accumulated deficit
|
|
|
(16,685
|
)
|
|
|
(14,732
|
)
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
|
|
|
(491
|
)
|
|
|
(583
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total common shareholders equity
|
|
|
6,145
|
|
|
|
7,804
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and shareholders equity
|
|
$
|
76,532
|
|
|
$
|
94,553
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated
financial statements.
3
HSBC Finance Corporation
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
(dollars are in millions)
|
|
|
Preferred stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at the beginning of period
|
|
|
575
|
|
|
|
575
|
|
|
|
575
|
|
Issuance of Series C preferred stock
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at the end of period
|
|
$
|
1,575
|
|
|
$
|
575
|
|
|
$
|
575
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common shareholders equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning and end of period
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of period
|
|
$
|
23,119
|
|
|
$
|
21,485
|
|
|
$
|
18,227
|
|
Excess of book value over consideration received on sale of U.K.
Operations to an HSBC affiliate
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(196
|
)
|
Excess of book value over consideration received on sale of
Canadian Operations to an HSBC affiliate
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(46
|
)
|
Capital contribution from parent
|
|
|
200
|
|
|
|
2,685
|
|
|
|
3,500
|
|
Return of capital to parent
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(1,043
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
Employee benefit plans, including transfers and other
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of period
|
|
$
|
23,321
|
|
|
$
|
23,119
|
|
|
$
|
21,485
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Accumulated deficit) retained earnings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of period
|
|
$
|
(14,732
|
)
|
|
$
|
(7,245
|
)
|
|
$
|
(4,423
|
)
|
Net loss
|
|
|
(1,916
|
)
|
|
|
(7,450
|
)
|
|
|
(2,783
|
)
|
Dividend equivalents on HSBCs Restricted Share Plan
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
Dividends:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock
|
|
|
(37
|
)
|
|
|
(37
|
)
|
|
|
(37
|
)
|
Common stock
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of period
|
|
$
|
(16,685
|
)
|
|
$
|
(14,732
|
)
|
|
$
|
(7,245
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of period
|
|
$
|
(583
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,378
|
)
|
|
$
|
(220
|
)
|
Net change in unrealized gains (losses), net of tax, on:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives classified as cash flow hedges
|
|
|
57
|
|
|
|
684
|
|
|
|
(610
|
)
|
Securities
available-for-sale,
not other-than temporarily impaired
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
92
|
|
|
|
(53
|
)
|
Other-than-temporarily
impaired debt securities
available-for-sale(1)
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
Postretirement benefit plan adjustment, net of tax
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
Foreign currency translation adjustments, net of tax
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
(120
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax
|
|
|
92
|
|
|
|
795
|
|
|
|
(784
|
)
|
Reclassification of foreign currency translation and pension
adjustments to additional paid-in capital resulting from sale of
U.K. Operations
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(380
|
)
|
Reclassification of foreign currency translation and pension
adjustments to additional paid-in capital resulting from sale of
Canadian Operations
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of period
|
|
$
|
(491
|
)
|
|
$
|
(583
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,378
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total common shareholders equity
|
|
$
|
6,145
|
|
|
$
|
7,804
|
|
|
$
|
12,862
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income ( loss)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
$
|
(1,916
|
)
|
|
$
|
(7,450
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2,783
|
)
|
Other comprehensive income (loss)
|
|
|
92
|
|
|
|
795
|
|
|
|
(784
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income (loss)
|
|
$
|
(1,824
|
)
|
|
$
|
(6,655
|
)
|
|
$
|
(3,567
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of shares at beginning of period
|
|
|
575,000
|
|
|
|
575,000
|
|
|
|
575,000
|
|
Number of shares of Series C preferred stock issued
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of shares at the end of period
|
|
|
576,000
|
|
|
|
575,000
|
|
|
|
575,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of shares at beginning of period
|
|
|
65
|
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
|
57
|
|
Number of shares of common stock issued to parent
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of shares at end of period
|
|
|
66
|
|
|
|
65
|
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
During 2010, gross
other-than-temporary
impairment (OTTI) recoveries on
available-for-sale
securities totaled $4 million, all relating to the
non-credit component of OTTI previously recorded in accumulated
other comprehensive income (AOCI). During 2009,
$36 million of gross OTTI losses on securities
available-for-sale
were recognized, of which $11 million were recognized in
AOCI.
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated
financial statements.
4
HSBC Finance Corporation
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
|
Cash flows from operating activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
$
|
(1,916
|
)
|
|
$
|
(7,450
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2,783
|
)
|
Loss from discontinued operations
|
|
|
(17
|
)
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
(175
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from continuing operations
|
|
|
(1,899
|
)
|
|
|
(7,466
|
)
|
|
|
(2,608
|
)
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by
(used in) operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for credit losses
|
|
|
6,180
|
|
|
|
9,650
|
|
|
|
12,410
|
|
Gain on bulk sale of receivables to HSBC Bank USA, National
Association (HSBC Bank USA)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(50
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
Gain on receivable sales to HSBC affiliates
|
|
|
(540
|
)
|
|
|
(469
|
)
|
|
|
(260
|
)
|
Goodwill and other intangible impairment charges
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
2,308
|
|
|
|
329
|
|
Loss on sale of real estate owned, including lower of cost or
market adjustments
|
|
|
128
|
|
|
|
101
|
|
|
|
229
|
|
Insurance policy and claim reserves
|
|
|
(53
|
)
|
|
|
(18
|
)
|
|
|
(41
|
)
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
179
|
|
|
|
202
|
|
|
|
243
|
|
Mark-to-market
on debt designated at fair value and related derivatives
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
|
2,880
|
|
|
|
(2,924
|
)
|
Gain on sale of Visa Class B shares
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
Deferred income tax (benefit) provision
|
|
|
315
|
|
|
|
(247
|
)
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
Net change in other assets
|
|
|
2,813
|
|
|
|
(754
|
)
|
|
|
(206
|
)
|
Net change in other liabilities
|
|
|
(306
|
)
|
|
|
(584
|
)
|
|
|
(804
|
)
|
Originations of loans held for sale
|
|
|
(33,799
|
)
|
|
|
(38,089
|
)
|
|
|
(24,884
|
)
|
Sales and collections on loans held for sale
|
|
|
34,343
|
|
|
|
38,786
|
|
|
|
25,114
|
|
Foreign exchange and derivative movements on long-term debt and
net change in non-FVO related derivative assets and liabilities
|
|
|
(630
|
)
|
|
|
(594
|
)
|
|
|
(161
|
)
|
Change in accrued finance income related to December 2009
charge-off policy changes and nonaccrual policy change for
re-aged loans
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
541
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Other-than-temporary
impairment on securities
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
54
|
|
Lower of cost or fair value adjustments on receivables held for
sale
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
374
|
|
|
|
514
|
|
Other, net
|
|
|
438
|
|
|
|
185
|
|
|
|
148
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash provided by operating activities-continuing operations
|
|
|
7,215
|
|
|
|
6,781
|
|
|
|
7,129
|
|
Cash provided by operating activities-discontinued operations
|
|
|
609
|
|
|
|
593
|
|
|
|
1,496
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities
|
|
|
7,824
|
|
|
|
7,374
|
|
|
|
8,625
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchased
|
|
|
(1,051
|
)
|
|
|
(536
|
)
|
|
|
(452
|
)
|
Matured
|
|
|
452
|
|
|
|
363
|
|
|
|
538
|
|
Sold
|
|
|
216
|
|
|
|
166
|
|
|
|
175
|
|
Net change in short-term securities
available-for-sale
|
|
|
274
|
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
|
(510
|
)
|
Net change in securities purchased under agreements to resell
|
|
|
(1,461
|
)
|
|
|
(1,825
|
)
|
|
|
481
|
|
Net change in interest bearing deposits with banks
|
|
|
(999
|
)
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
251
|
|
Proceeds from sale of affiliate preferred shares to HSBC
Holdings Plc
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
242
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Proceeds from sale of Low Income Housing Tax Credit Investment
Funds to HSBC Bank USA
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
106
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Proceeds from sale of Visa Class B shares
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
Receivables:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (originations) collections
|
|
|
4,623
|
|
|
|
6,170
|
|
|
|
4,452
|
|
Purchases and related premiums
|
|
|
(45
|
)
|
|
|
(43
|
)
|
|
|
(48
|
)
|
Proceeds from sales of real estate owned
|
|
|
1,338
|
|
|
|
1,467
|
|
|
|
1,591
|
|
Proceeds from bulk sale of receivables to HSBC Bank USA
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
6,045
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Proceeds from sales of real estate secured receivables held in
portfolio to a third party
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1,116
|
|
Properties and equipment:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases
|
|
|
(15
|
)
|
|
|
(51
|
)
|
|
|
(77
|
)
|
Sales
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash provided by (used in) investing activities-continuing
operations
|
|
|
3,332
|
|
|
|
12,164
|
|
|
|
7,578
|
|
Cash provided by (used in) investing activities-discontinued
operations
|
|
|
3,613
|
|
|
|
5,227
|
|
|
|
2,622
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities
|
|
|
6,945
|
|
|
|
17,391
|
|
|
|
10,200
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5
HSBC Finance Corporation
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net change in short-term debt
|
|
|
(1,135
|
)
|
|
|
(5,348
|
)
|
|
|
1,914
|
|
Net change in due to affiliates
|
|
|
(1,553
|
)
|
|
|
(4,225
|
)
|
|
|
2,184
|
|
Long-term debt issued
|
|
|
1,714
|
|
|
|
4,078
|
|
|
|
4,075
|
|
Long-term debt retired
|
|
|
(14,734
|
)
|
|
|
(19,312
|
)
|
|
|
(29,029
|
)
|
Issuance of preferred stocks
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Insurance:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Policyholders benefits paid
|
|
|
(80
|
)
|
|
|
(95
|
)
|
|
|
(95
|
)
|
Cash received from policyholders
|
|
|
66
|
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
|
54
|
|
Capital contribution from parent
|
|
|
200
|
|
|
|
2,410
|
|
|
|
3,500
|
|
Return of capital to parent
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(1,043
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
Shareholders dividends
|
|
|
(37
|
)
|
|
|
(37
|
)
|
|
|
(37
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash provided by (used in) financing activities-continuing
operations
|
|
|
(14,559
|
)
|
|
|
(23,514
|
)
|
|
|
(17,434
|
)
|
Cash provided by (used in) financing activities-discontinued
operations
|
|
|
(346
|
)
|
|
|
(1,195
|
)
|
|
|
(1,893
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
|
|
|
(14,905
|
)
|
|
|
(24,709
|
)
|
|
|
(19,327
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(26
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net change in cash
|
|
|
(136
|
)
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
|
(528
|
)
|
Cash at beginning of
period(1)
|
|
|
311
|
|
|
|
255
|
|
|
|
783
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash at end of
period(2)
|
|
$
|
175
|
|
|
$
|
311
|
|
|
$
|
255
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental Cash Flow Information:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest paid
|
|
$
|
3,222
|
|
|
$
|
4,183
|
|
|
$
|
6,069
|
|
Income taxes paid during period
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
98
|
|
|
|
46
|
|
Income taxes refunded during period
|
|
|
4,135
|
|
|
|
1,030
|
|
|
|
264
|
|
Supplemental Noncash Activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of properties added to real estate owned
|
|
$
|
1,834
|
|
|
$
|
1,275
|
|
|
$
|
2,137
|
|
Transfer of receivables to held for sale
|
|
|
2,910
|
|
|
|
609
|
|
|
|
19,335
|
|
Transfer of receivables to held for investment
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1,294
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Extinguishment of indebtedness related to bulk receivable sale
|
|
|
(431
|
)
|
|
|
(6,077
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
Issuance of subordinated debt exchanged for senior debt
|
|
|
1,939
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Extinguishment of senior debt exchanged for subordinated debt
|
|
|
(1,797
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Redemption of junior subordinated notes underlying the
mandatorily redeemable preferred securities of the Household
Capital Trust VIII for common stock
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(275
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Cash at beginning of period
includes $22 million, $17 million and
$204 million for discontinued operations as of
December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
|
|
(2) |
|
Cash at end of period includes
$22 million and $17 million for discontinued
operations as of December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated
financial statements.
6
HSBC
Finance Corporation
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
HSBC Finance Corporation is an indirect wholly owned subsidiary
of HSBC North America Holdings Inc. (HSBC North
America), which is an indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of
HSBC Holdings plc (HSBC). HSBC Finance Corporation
and its subsidiaries may also be referred to in these notes to
the consolidated financial statements as we,
us or our. HSBC Finance Corporation
provides middle-market consumers with several types of loan
products in the United States. Our lending products currently
include MasterCard, Visa, American Express and Discover credit
card receivables (Credit Card) as well as private
label receivables. A portion of new credit card and all new
private label originations are sold on a daily basis to HSBC
Bank USA, National Association (HSBC Bank USA). We
also offer specialty insurance products in the United States and
Canada. Historically, our lending products have also included
real estate secured, auto finance and personal non-credit card
receivables in the United States, the United Kingdom and
Canada and tax refund anticipation loans and related products in
the United States. Additionally, we also previously offered
credit and specialty insurance in the United Kingdom. We have
two reportable segments: Card and Retail Services and Consumer.
Our Card and Retail Services segment includes our credit card
operations, including private label credit cards. Our Consumer
segment consists of our run-off Consumer Lending and Mortgage
Services businesses.
|
|
2.
|
Summary
of Significant Accounting Policies and New Accounting
Pronouncements
|
Summary
of Significant Accounting Policies
Basis of Presentation The consolidated
financial statements have been prepared on the basis that we
will continue as a going concern. Such assertion contemplates
the significant loss recognized in recent years and the
challenges we anticipate with respect to a near-term return to
profitability under prevailing and forecasted economic
conditions. HSBC continues to be fully committed and has the
capacity to continue to provide the necessary capital and
liquidity to fund continuing operations.
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of
HSBC Finance Corporation and all subsidiaries including all
variable interest entities (VIEs) in which we are
the primary beneficiary. HSBC Finance Corporation and its
subsidiaries may also be referred to in these notes to
consolidated financial statements as we,
us, or our.
On January 1, 2010, we adopted new guidance issued by the
Financial Accounting Standards Board in June 2009 related to
VIEs. The new guidance eliminated the concept of qualifying
special purpose entities (QSPEs) that were
previously exempt from consolidation and changed the approach
for determining the primary beneficiary of a VIE, which is
required to consolidate the VIE, from a quantitative approach
focusing on risk and reward to a qualitative approach focusing
on (a) the power to direct the activities of the VIE and
(b) the obligation to absorb losses
and/or the
right to receive benefits that could be significant to the VIE.
We assess whether an entity is a VIE and, if so, whether we are
its primary beneficiary at the time of initial involvement with
the entity and on an ongoing basis. A VIE must be consolidated
by its primary beneficiary, which is the entity with the power
to direct the activities of a VIE that most significantly impact
its economic performance and the obligation to absorb losses of,
or the right to receive benefits from, the VIE that could
potentially be significant to the VIE. We are involved with VIEs
primarily in connection with our collateralized funding
transactions. See Note 15, Long-Term Debt, for
additional discussion of those activities and the use of VIEs.
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with
accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States of America requires management to make
estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in
the financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results
could differ from those estimates. Unless otherwise indicated,
information included in these notes to consolidated financial
statements relates to continuing operations for all periods
presented. In 2010, we completed the sale of our auto finance
receivable servicing operations and auto finance receivables
portfolio to Santander Consumer USA and we exited the Taxpayer
Financial Services business. As a result, both of these
businesses are now reported as discontinued operations. See
7
HSBC Finance Corporation
Note 3, Discontinued Operations, for further
details. Certain reclassifications have been made to prior
period amounts to conform to the current year presentation.
Securities purchased under agreements to
resell Securities purchased under agreements
to resell are treated as collateralized financing transactions
and are carried at the amounts at which the securities were
acquired plus accrued interest. Interest income earned on these
securities is included in net interest income.
Securities We maintain investment
portfolios of debt securities (comprised primarily of corporate
debt securities) in both our noninsurance and insurance
operations. Our entire investment securities portfolio is
classified as
available-for-sale.
Available-for-sale
investment securities are intended to be invested for an
indefinite period but may be sold in response to events we
expect to occur in the foreseeable future. These investments are
carried at fair value with changes in fair value recorded as
adjustments to common shareholders equity in other
comprehensive income (loss), net of income taxes.
When the fair value of a security has declined below its
amortized cost basis, we evaluate the decline to assess if it is
considered
other-than-temporary.
To the extent that such a decline is deemed to be
other-than-temporary,
an
other-than-temporary
impairment loss is recognized in earnings equal to the
difference between the securitys cost and its fair value
except that beginning in 2009, only the credit loss component of
such a decline is recognized in earnings for a debt security
that we do not intend to sell and for which it is not
more-likely-than-not that we will be required to sell prior to
recovery of its amortized cost basis. A new cost basis is
established for the security that reflects the amount of the
other-than-temporary
impairment loss recognized in earnings.
Cost of investment securities sold is determined using the
specific identification method. Realized gains and losses from
the investment portfolio are recorded in investment income.
Interest income earned on the noninsurance investment portfolio
is classified in the statements of income in net interest
income, while investment income from the insurance portfolio is
recorded in investment income. Accrued investment income is
classified with investment securities.
For cash flow presentation purposes, we consider
available-for-sale
securities with original maturities less than 90 days as
short term, and thus any purchases, sales and maturities are
presented on a net basis.
Receivables Held for Sale Receivables
are classified as held for sale when management does not have
the intent to hold the receivable for the foreseeable future.
Such receivables are carried at the lower of aggregate cost or
fair value with any subsequent write downs or recoveries charged
to other income. Unearned income, unamortized deferred fees and
costs on originated receivables, and discounts on purchased
receivables are recorded as an adjustment of the cost of the
receivable and are not reflected in earnings until the
receivables are sold.
Receivables Finance receivables are
carried at amortized cost, which represents the principal amount
outstanding, net of any unearned income, charge-offs,
unamortized deferred fees and costs on originated loans,
purchase accounting fair value adjustments and premiums or
discounts on purchased loans. Finance receivables are further
reduced by credit loss reserves and unearned credit insurance
premiums and claims reserves applicable to credit risk on our
consumer receivables. Finance income, which includes interest
income, unamortized deferred fees and costs on originated
receivables and premiums or discounts on purchased receivables,
is recognized using the effective yield method. Premiums and
discounts, including purchase accounting adjustments on
receivables, are recognized as adjustments to the yield of the
related receivables. Origination fees, which include points on
real estate secured loans, are deferred and generally amortized
to finance income over the estimated life of the related
receivables, except to the extent they offset directly related
lending costs.
Provision and Credit Loss
Reserves Provision for credit losses on
receivables is made in an amount sufficient to maintain credit
loss reserves at a level considered adequate, but not excessive,
to cover probable incurred losses of principal, accrued interest
and fees, including late, over limit and annual fees, in the
existing loan portfolio. We estimate probable incurred losses
for consumer receivables using a roll rate migration analysis
that estimates the likelihood that a loan will progress through
the various stages of delinquency and ultimately charge-off.
This analysis considers delinquency status, loss experience and
severity and takes into account whether loans are in bankruptcy,
have been re-aged, or are subject to forbearance, an external
debt management plan, hardship,
8
HSBC Finance Corporation
modification, extension or deferment. Our credit loss reserves
also take into consideration the loss severity expected based on
the underlying collateral, if any, for the loan in the event of
default based on historical and recent trends. Delinquency
status may be affected by customer account management policies
and practices, such as the re-age of accounts, forbearance
agreements, extended payment plans, modification arrangements,
and deferments. When customer account management policies, or
changes thereto, shift loans from a higher
delinquency bucket to a lower delinquency bucket,
this will be reflected in our roll rate statistics. To the
extent that restructured accounts have a greater propensity to
roll to higher delinquency buckets, this will be captured in the
roll rates. Since the loss reserve is computed based on the
composite of all these calculations, this increase in roll rate
will be applied to receivables in all respective buckets, which
will increase the overall reserve level. In addition, loss
reserves on consumer receivables are maintained to reflect our
judgment of portfolio risk factors which may not be fully
reflected in the statistical roll rate calculation. Risk factors
considered in establishing loss reserves on consumer receivables
include product mix, bankruptcy trends, geographic
concentrations, loan product features such as adjustable rate
loans, economic conditions such as national and local trends in
unemployment, housing markets and interest rates, portfolio
seasoning, account management policies and practices, current
levels of charge-offs and delinquencies, changes in laws and
regulations and other items which can affect consumer payment
patterns on outstanding receivables such as natural disasters
and global pandemics.
While our credit loss reserves are available to absorb losses in
the entire portfolio, we specifically consider the credit
quality and other risk factors for each of our products. We
recognize the different inherent loss characteristics in each of
our products, and for certain products their vintages, as well
as customer account management policies and practices and risk
management/collection practices. Charge-off policies are also
considered when establishing loss reserve requirements. We also
consider key ratios such as reserves to nonperforming loans,
reserves as a percentage of net charge-offs, reserves as a
percentage of two-months-and-over contractual delinquency and
months coverage ratios in developing our loss reserve estimate.
Loss reserve estimates are reviewed periodically and adjustments
are reported in earnings when they become known. As these
estimates are influenced by factors outside our control, such as
consumer payment patterns and economic conditions, there is
uncertainty inherent in these estimates, making it reasonably
possible that they could change.
Provisions for credit losses on consumer loans for which we have
modified the terms of the loan as part of a troubled debt
restructuring (TDR Loans) are determined using a
discounted cash flow impairment analysis. Loans which have been
granted a permanent modification, a twelve-month or longer
modification, or two or more consecutive six-month modifications
are considered TDR Loans as it is generally believed that the
borrower is experiencing financial difficulty and a concession
has been granted. Modifications may include changes to one or
more terms of the loan, including but not limited to, a change
in interest rate, an extension of the amortization period, a
reduction in payment amount and partial forgiveness or deferment
of principal. TDR Loans are considered to be impaired loans.
Interest income on TDR Loans is recognized in the same manner as
loans which are not TDRs. Once a loan is classified as a TDR, it
continues to be reported as such until it is paid off or
charged-off.
9
HSBC Finance Corporation
Charge-Off and Nonaccrual Policies and
Practices Our consumer charge-off and
nonaccrual policies vary by product and are summarized below:
|
|
|
|
|
Product
|
|
Charge-off Policies and Practices
|
|
Nonaccrual Policies and
Practices(1)
|
|
|
Real estate
secured(2)
|
|
Beginning in December 2009, carrying value in excess of net
realizable value less cost to sell are generally charged-off at
or before the time foreclosure is completed or settlement is
reached with the borrower but, in any event, generally no later
than the end of the month in which the account becomes six
months contractually delinquent. If foreclosure is not pursued
(which frequently occurs on loans in the second lien position)
and there is no reasonable expectation for recovery (insurance
claim, title claim, pre-discharge bankrupt account), the account
is generally charged-off no later than the end of the month in
which the account becomes six months contractually delinquent.
|
|
Interest income accruals are suspended when principal or
interest payments are more than three months contractually past
due. Beginning in October 2009, interest accruals are resumed
and suspended interest is recognized when the customer makes the
equivalent of six qualifying payments under the terms of the
loan, while maintaining a current payment status at the point of
the sixth payment. If the re-aged receivable again becomes more
than three months contractually delinquent, any interest accrued
beyond three months delinquency is reversed.
|
|
|
Prior to December 2009, carrying values in excess of net
realizable value were charged-off at or before the time
foreclosure was completed or when settlement was reached with
the borrower. If foreclosure was not pursued and there was no
reasonable expectation for recovery, generally the account was
charged-off no later than by the end of the month in which the
account became eight months contractually delinquent.
|
|
Prior to October 2009, upon re-age interest accruals were
resumed and all suspended interest was recognized. For Consumer
Lending, if the re-aged receivable again became more than three
months contractually delinquent, any interest accrued beyond
three months delinquency was reversed.
|
Auto
finance(3)
|
|
Carrying values in excess of net realizable value are charged off at the earlier of the following:
the collateral has been repossessed and sold,
the collateral has been in our possession for more than 30 days, or
the loan becomes 120 days contractually delinquent (prior to January 2009, 150 days contractually delinquent).
|
|
Interest income accruals are suspended and the portion of
previously accrued interest expected to be uncollectible is
written off when principal payments are more than two months
contractually past due and resumed when the receivable becomes
less than two months contractually past due.
|
10
HSBC Finance Corporation
|
|
|
|
|
Product
|
|
Charge-off Policies and Practices
|
|
Nonaccrual Policies and
Practices(1)
|
|
|
Credit card
|
|
Generally charged-off by the end of the month in which the
account becomes six months contractually delinquent.
|
|
Interest generally accrues until charge-off.
|
Personal non-credit
card(4)
|
|
Beginning in December 2009, accounts are generally charged-off by the end of the month in which the account becomes six months contractually delinquent.
Prior to December 2009, accounts were generally charged-off the month following the month in which the account became nine months contractually delinquent and no payment was received in six months, but in no event exceeded 12 months contractually delinquent (except in our discontinued United Kingdom business which did not include a recency factor).
|
|
Interest income accruals are suspended when principal or interest payments are more than three months contractually past due. Interest subsequently received is generally recorded as collected and accruals are not resumed upon a re-age when the receivable becomes less than three months contractually delinquent.
For PHLs prior to October 2009 upon re-age, interest accruals were resumed and suspended interest accruals were recognized. If the receivable again becomes more than three months contractually delinquent, any interest accrued beyond three months delinquency is reversed.
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
For our discontinued United Kingdom
business, interest income accruals were suspended when principal
or interest payments were more than three months contractually
delinquent.
|
|
(2) |
|
For our discontinued United Kingdom
business, real estate secured carrying values in excess of net
realizable value were charged-off at the time of sale.
|
|
(3) |
|
Our Auto Finance business is now
reported as discontinued operations as a result of the sale of
our auto finance receivable servicing operations and auto
finance receivables during 2010. See Note 3,
Discontinued Operations, for additional information.
For our discontinued Canadian business, interest income accruals
on auto loans were suspended and the portion of previously
accrued interest expected to be uncollectible was written off
when principal payments are more than three months contractually
past due and resumed when the receivables become less than three
months contractually past due.
|
|
(4) |
|
For our discontinued Canadian
business, delinquent personal non-credit card receivables were
charged off when no payment is received in six months but in no
event is an account to exceed 12 months contractually
delinquent.
|
Charge-off involving a bankruptcy for our credit card
receivables occurs by the end of the month at the earlier of
60 days after notification or 180 days delinquent. For
auto finance receivables, bankrupt accounts were charged off at
the earlier of (i) 60 days past due and 60 days
after notification, or (ii) the end of the month in which
the account becomes 120 days contractually delinquent.
Prior to January 2009, auto finance accounts involving a
bankruptcy were charged-off no later than the end of the month
in which the loan became 210 days contractually delinquent.
Delinquency status for loans is determined using the contractual
method which is based on the status of payments under the loan.
An account is generally considered to be contractually
delinquent when payments have not been made in accordance with
the loan terms. Delinquency status may be affected by customer
account management policies and practices such as the
restructure, re-age or modification of accounts.
Payments applied to nonaccrual loans are generally applied first
to reduce the current interest on the earliest payment due with
any remainder applied to reduce the principal balance associated
with that payment due.
Transfers of Financial Assets and
Securitizations Transfers of financial assets
in which we have surrendered control over the transferred assets
are accounted for as sales. In assessing whether control has
been surrendered, we consider whether the transferee would be a
consolidated affiliate, the existence and extent of any
continuing involvement in the transferred financial assets and
the impact of all arrangements or agreements made
11
HSBC Finance Corporation
contemporaneously with, or in contemplation of, the transfer,
even if they were not entered into at the time of transfer.
Control is generally considered to have been surrendered when
(i) the transferred assets have been legally isolated from
us and our consolidated affiliates, even in bankruptcy or other
receivership, (ii) the transferee (or, if the transferee is
an entity whose sole purpose is to engage in securitization or
asset-backed financing that is constrained from pledging or
exchanging the assets it receives, each third-party holder of
its beneficial interests) has the right to pledge or exchange
the assets (or beneficial interests) it received without any
constraints that provide more than a trivial benefit to us, and
(iii) neither we nor our consolidated affiliates and agents
have (a) both the right and obligation under any agreement
to repurchase or redeem the transferred assets before their
maturity, (b) the unilateral ability to cause the holder to
return specific financial assets that also provides us with a
more-than-trivial
benefit (other than through a cleanup call) and (c) an
agreement that permits the transferee to require us to
repurchase the transferred assets at a price so favorable that
it is probable that it will require us to repurchase them.
If the sale criteria are met, the transferred financial assets
are removed from our balance sheet and a gain or loss on sale is
recognized. If the sale criteria are not met, the transfer is
recorded as a secured borrowing in which the assets remain on
our balance sheet and the proceeds from the transaction are
recognized as a liability (a secured financing). For
the majority of financial asset transfers, it is clear whether
or not we have surrendered control. For other transfers, such as
in connection with complex transactions or where we have
continuing involvement such as servicing responsibilities, we
generally obtain a legal opinion as to whether the transfer
results in a true sale by law.
We have used collateral funding transactions for certain real
estate secured, credit card and personal non-credit card
receivables where it provides an attractive source of funding.
All collateralized funding transactions remaining on our balance
sheet have been structured as secured financings.
Properties and Equipment,
Net Properties and equipment are recorded at
cost, net of accumulated depreciation and amortization. For
financial reporting purposes, depreciation is provided on a
straight-line basis over the estimated useful lives of the
assets which generally range from 3 to 40 years. Leasehold
improvements are amortized over the lesser of the useful life of
the improvement or the term of the lease. Maintenance and
repairs are expensed as incurred.
Repossessed Collateral Collateral
acquired in satisfaction of a loan is initially recognized at
the lower of amortized cost or its fair value less estimated
costs to sell and reported as either real estate owned or within
other assets depending on the collateral. A valuation allowance
is created to recognize any subsequent declines in fair value
less estimated costs to sell. These values are periodically
reviewed and adjusted against the valuation allowance but not in
excess of cumulative losses previously recognized subsequent to
the date of repossession. Adjustments to the valuation
allowance, costs of holding repossessed collateral, and any gain
or loss on disposition are credited or charged to operating
expense.
Insurance Insurance revenues on monthly
premium insurance policies are recognized when billed. Insurance
revenues on the remaining insurance contracts are recorded as
unearned premiums and recognized into income based on the nature
and terms of the underlying contracts. Liabilities for credit
insurance policies are based upon estimated settlement amounts
for both reported and incurred but not yet reported losses.
Liabilities for future benefits on annuity contracts and
specialty and corporate owned life insurance products are based
on actuarial assumptions as to investment yields, mortality and
withdrawals.
Intangible Assets Intangible assets
currently consist of purchased credit card relationships and
related programs, other loan related relationships, technology
and customer lists. Intangible assets are amortized over their
estimated useful lives on a straight-line basis. These useful
lives range from 7 years for certain technology and other
loan related relationships to approximately 10 years for
certain purchased credit card relationships and related
programs. Intangible assets are reviewed for impairment using
discounted cash flows annually, or earlier if events indicate
that the carrying amounts may not be recoverable. We consider
significant and long-term changes in industry and economic
conditions to be our primary indicator of potential impairment.
Impairment charges, when required, are calculated using
discounted cash flow models, using inputs and assumptions
consistent with those used by market participants.
12
HSBC Finance Corporation
Goodwill Goodwill represents the excess
purchase price over the fair value of identifiable assets
acquired less liabilities assumed from business combinations.
Goodwill is not amortized, but is reviewed for impairment
annually using a discounted cash flow methodology. This
methodology utilizes cash flow estimates based on internal
forecasts updated to reflect current economic conditions and
revised economic projections at the review date and discount
rates that we believe adequately reflect the risk and
uncertainty in our internal forecasts and are appropriate based
on the implicit market rates in current comparable transactions.
Impairment may be reviewed as of an interim date if
circumstances indicate that the carrying amount may not be
recoverable. We consider significant and long-term changes in
industry and economic conditions to be our primary indicator of
potential impairment.
The goodwill impairment analysis is a two step process. The
first step, used to identify potential impairment, involves
comparing each reporting units fair value to its carrying
value, including goodwill. If the fair value of a reporting unit
exceeds its carrying value, including allocated goodwill, there
is no indication of impairment and no further procedures are
required. If the carrying value including allocated goodwill
exceeds fair value, the second step is performed to quantify the
impairment amount, if any. If the implied fair value of
goodwill, as determined using the same methodology as used in a
business combination, is less than the carrying value of
goodwill, an impairment charge is recorded for the excess. An
impairment recognized cannot exceed the amount of goodwill
assigned to a reporting unit. Subsequent reversals of goodwill
impairment are not permitted. As of December 31, 2009, all
of the goodwill previously recorded has been written off.
Derivative Financial Instruments All
derivatives are recognized on the balance sheet at their fair
value. At the inception of a hedging relationship, we designate
the derivative as a fair value hedge, a cash flow hedge, or if
the derivative does not qualify in a hedging relationship, a
non-hedging derivative. Fair value hedges include hedges of the
fair value of a recognized asset or liability and certain
foreign currency hedges. Cash flow hedges include hedges of the
variability of cash flows to be received or paid related to a
recognized asset or liability and certain foreign currency
hedges.
Changes in the fair value of derivatives designated as fair
value hedges, along with the change in fair value on the hedged
risk, are recorded as derivative related income (expense) in the
current period. Changes in the fair value of derivatives
designated as cash flow hedges, to the extent effective as a
hedge, are recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income
(loss) and reclassified into net interest margin in the period
during which the hedged item affects earnings. Changes in the
fair value of derivative instruments not designated as hedging
instruments and ineffective portions of changes in the fair
value of hedging instruments are recognized in other revenue as
derivative related income (expense) in the current period.
Realized gains and losses as well as changes in the fair value
of derivative instruments associated with fixed rate debt we
have designated at fair value are recognized in other revenues
as gain (loss) on debt designated at fair value and related
derivatives in the current period.
For derivative instruments designated as qualifying hedges, we
formally document all relationships between hedging instruments
and hedged items. This documentation includes our risk
management objective and strategy for undertaking various hedge
transactions, as well as how hedge effectiveness and
ineffectiveness will be measured. This process includes linking
derivatives to specific assets and liabilities on the balance
sheet. We also formally assess, both at the hedges
inception and on a quarterly basis, whether the derivatives that
are used in hedging transactions are highly effective in
offsetting changes in fair values or cash flows of hedged items.
This assessment is conducted using statistical regression
analysis. When as a result of the quarterly assessment, it is
determined that a derivative is not expected to continue to be
highly effective as a hedge or that it has ceased to be a highly
effective hedge, we discontinue hedge accounting as of the
beginning of the quarter in which such determination was made.
When hedge accounting is discontinued because it is determined
that the derivative no longer qualifies as an effective hedge,
the derivative will continue to be carried on the balance sheet
at its fair value, with changes in its fair value recognized in
current period earnings. For fair value hedges, the formerly
hedged asset or liability will no longer be adjusted for changes
in fair value and any previously recorded adjustments to the
carrying value of the hedged asset or liability will be
amortized in the same manner that the hedged item affects
income. For cash flow hedges, amounts previously recorded in
accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) will be
reclassified into income in the same manner that the hedged item
affects income.
13
HSBC Finance Corporation
If the hedging instrument is terminated early, the derivative is
removed from the balance sheet. Accounting for the adjustments
to the hedged asset or liability or adjustments to accumulated
other comprehensive income (loss) are the same as described
above when a derivative no longer qualifies as an effective
hedge.
If the hedged asset or liability is sold or extinguished, the
derivative will continue to be carried on the balance sheet
until termination at its fair value, with changes in its fair
value recognized in current period earnings. The hedged item,
including previously recorded
mark-to-market
adjustments, is derecognized immediately as a component of the
gain or loss upon disposition.
Foreign Currency Translation Effects of
foreign currency translation in the statements of cash flows,
primarily a result of the specialty insurance products we offer
in Canada, were offset against the cumulative foreign currency
adjustment within accumulated other comprehensive income, except
for the impact on cash. Foreign currency transaction gains and
losses are included in income as they occur.
Prior to the sale of our U.K. and Canadian Operations in 2008,
the functional currency for each of these foreign subsidiaries
was its local currency. Assets and liabilities of these
subsidiaries were translated at the rate of exchange in effect
on the balance sheet date. Translation adjustments resulting
from this process were accumulated in common shareholders
equity as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income
(loss). Income and expenses were translated at the average rate
of exchange prevailing during the year.
Share-Based Compensation We account for
all awards of HSBC stock granted to employees under various
share option, restricted share, restricted stock units and
employee stock purchase plans using the fair value based
measurement method of accounting. The fair value of the rewards
granted is recognized as expense over the requisite service
period (e.g., vesting period), generally one, three or five
years for options and three years for restricted share awards.
The fair value of each option granted, measured at the grant
date, is calculated using a methodology that is based on the
underlying assumptions of the Black-Scholes option pricing model.
Compensation expense relating to restricted share awards is
based upon the fair value of the shares on the date of grant.
Pension and Other Postretirement
Benefits We recognize the funded status of
our postretirement benefit plans on the consolidated balance
sheets with the offset to accumulated other comprehensive income
(loss), net of tax. Net postretirement benefit cost charged to
current earnings related to these plans is based on various
actuarial assumptions regarding expected future experience.
Certain of our employees are participants in various defined
contribution and other non-qualified supplemental retirement
plans. Our contributions to these plans are charged to current
earnings.
Through various subsidiaries, we maintain various 401(k) plans
covering substantially all employees. Employer contributions to
the plan, which are charged to current earnings, are based on
employee contributions.
Income Taxes HSBC Finance Corporation
is included in HSBC North Americas consolidated federal
income tax return and in various combined state income tax
returns. As such, we have entered into a tax allocation
agreement with HSBC North America and its subsidiary entities
(the HNAH Group) included in the consolidated
returns which governs the current amount of taxes to be paid or
received by the various entities included in the consolidated
return filings. Generally, such agreements allocate taxes to
members of the HNAH Group based on the calculation of tax on a
separate return basis, adjusted for the utilization or
limitation of tax credits of the consolidated group. To the
extent all the tax attributes available cannot be currently
utilized by the consolidated group, the proportionate share of
the utilized attribute is allocated based on each
affiliates percentage of the available attribute computed
in a manner that is consistent with the taxing
jurisdictions laws and regulations regarding the ordering
of utilization. In addition, we file some unconsolidated state
tax returns.
We recognize deferred tax assets and liabilities for the future
tax consequences related to differences between the financial
statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities
and their respective tax bases, and for tax credits and net
operating and other losses. Deferred tax assets and liabilities
are measured using the enacted tax rates and laws that will be
in effect when the deferred tax items are expected to be
realized. If applicable, valuation
14
HSBC Finance Corporation
allowances are recorded to reduce deferred tax assets to the
amounts we conclude are more-likely-than-not to be realized.
Since we are included in HSBC North Americas consolidated
federal tax return and various combined state tax returns, the
related evaluation of the recoverability of the deferred tax
assets is performed at the HSBC North America legal entity
level. We look at the HNAH Groups consolidated deferred
tax assets and various sources of taxable income, including the
impact of HSBC and HNAH Group tax planning strategies, in
reaching conclusions on recoverability of deferred tax assets.
The HNAH Group evaluates deferred tax assets for recoverability
using a consistent approach which considers the relative impact
of negative and positive evidence, including historical
financial performance, projections of future taxable income,
future reversals of existing taxable temporary differences, tax
planning strategies and any available carryback capacity. In
evaluating the need for a valuation allowance, the HNAH Group
estimates future taxable income based on management approved
business plans, future capital requirements and ongoing tax
planning strategies, including capital support from HSBC
necessary as part of such plans and strategies. This process
involves significant management judgment about assumptions that
are subject to change from period to period. Only those tax
planning strategies that are both prudent and feasible, and for
which management has the ability and intent to implement, are
incorporated into our analysis and assessment.
Where a valuation allowance is determined to be necessary at the
HNAH consolidated level, such allowance is allocated to
principal subsidiaries within the HNAH Group in a manner that is
systematic, rational and consistent with the broad principles of
accounting for income taxes. The methodology allocates the
valuation allowance to the principal subsidiaries based
primarily on the entitys relative contribution to the
growth of the HNAH consolidated deferred tax asset against which
the valuation allowance is being recorded.
Further evaluation is performed at the HSBC Finance Corporation
legal entity level to evaluate the need for a valuation
allowance where we file separate company state income tax
returns. Investment tax credits generated by leveraged leases
are accounted for using the deferral method. Changes in
estimates of the basis in our assets and liabilities or other
estimates recorded at the date of our acquisition by HSBC are
recorded through earnings. Prior to the adoption on
January 1, 2009 of guidance issued by the FASB with respect
to business combinations, these changes in estimates were
adjusted against goodwill when it was determined that the
difference pertained to a balance originating prior to our
acquisition by HSBC.
Transactions with Related Parties In
the normal course of business, we enter into transactions with
HSBC and its subsidiaries. These transactions occur at
prevailing market rates and terms and include funding
arrangements, derivative execution, purchases and sales of
receivables, sales of businesses, servicing arrangements,
information technology services, item processing and statement
processing services, banking and other miscellaneous services,
human resources, corporate affairs and other shared services in
North America and beginning in 2010 also included tax, finance,
compliance and legal.
New
Accounting Pronouncements Adopted
Accounting for Transfers of Financial
Assets In June 2009, the FASB issued guidance
which amended the accounting for transfers of financial assets
by eliminating the concept of a qualifying special-purpose
entity (QSPE) and provided additional guidance with
regard to the accounting for transfers of financial assets. The
guidance became effective for all interim and annual periods
beginning after November 15, 2009. The adoption of this
guidance on January 1, 2010 did not have any impact on our
financial position or results of operations.
Accounting for Consolidation of Variable Interest
Entities In June 2009, the FASB issued
guidance which amended the accounting rules related to the
consolidation of variable interest entities (VIE).
The guidance changed the approach for determining the primary
beneficiary of a VIE from a quantitative risk and reward model
to a qualitative model, based on control and economics. The
guidance became effective for all interim and annual periods
beginning after November 15, 2009. The adoption of this
guidance on January 1, 2010 did not have an impact on our
financial position or results of operations. See Note 25,
Variable Interest Entities, in these consolidated
financial statements for additional information.
15
HSBC Finance Corporation
Improving Disclosures about Fair Value
Measurements In January 2010, the FASB issued
guidance to improve disclosures about fair value measurements.
The guidance requires entities to disclose separately the
amounts of significant transfers in and out of Level 1 and
Level 2 fair measurements and describe the reasons for
those transfers. It also requires the Level 3
reconciliation to be presented on a gross basis, while
disclosing purchases, sales, issuances and settlements
separately. The guidance became effective for interim and annual
financial periods beginning after December 15, 2009 except
for the requirement to present the Level 3 reconciliation
on a gross basis, which is effective for interim and annual
periods beginning after December 15, 2010. We adopted the
new disclosure requirements in their entirety effective
January 1, 2010. See Note 26, Fair Value
Measurements in these consolidated financial statements.
Subsequent Events In February 2010, the
FASB amended certain recognition and disclosure requirements for
subsequent events. The guidance clarified that an entity that
either (a) is an SEC filer, or (b) is a conduit bond
obligor for conduit debt securities that are traded in a public
market is required to evaluate subsequent events through the
date the financial statements are issued and in all other cases
through the date the financial statements are available to be
issued. The guidance eliminated the requirement to disclose the
date through which subsequent events are evaluated for an SEC
filer. The guidance was effective upon issuance. Adoption did
not have an impact on our financial position or results of
operations.
Derivatives and Hedging In March 2010,
the FASB issued a clarification on the scope exception for
embedded credit derivatives. The guidance eliminated the scope
exception for credit derivatives embedded in interests in
securitized financial assets, unless the credit derivative is
created solely by subordination of one financial debt instrument
to another. The guidance became effective beginning in the third
quarter of 2010. Adoption did not have any impact to our
financial position or results of operations.
Loan Modifications In April 2010, the
FASB issued guidance affecting the accounting for loan
modifications for those loans that are acquired with
deteriorated credit quality and are accounted for on a pool
basis. It clarified that the modifications of such loans do not
result in the removal of those loans from the pool even if the
modification of those loans would otherwise be considered a
troubled debt restructuring. An entity will continue to be
required to consider whether the pool of assets in which the
loan is included is impaired if expected cash flows of the pool
change. The new guidance became effective prospectively for
modifications to loans acquired with deteriorating credit
quality and accounted for on a pool basis occurring in the first
interim or annual period ending on or after July 15, 2010.
Adoption did not have any impact on our financial position or
results of operations.
Credit Quality and Allowance for Credit Losses
Disclosures In July 2010, the FASB issued
guidance to provide more transparency about an entitys
allowance for credit losses and the credit quality of its
financing receivables. The guidance amends the existing
disclosure requirements by requiring an entity to provide a
greater level of disaggregated information to assist financial
statement users in assessing its credit risk exposures and
evaluating the adequacy of its allowance for credit losses.
Additionally, the update requires an entity to disclose credit
quality indicators, past due information, and modification of
its financing receivables. The amendment is effective beginning
interim and annual reporting periods ending on or after
December 15, 2010. However, in January 2011, the FASB
delayed the disclosure requirements regarding troubled debt
restructurings. The new disclosures about troubled debt
restructurings are anticipated to be effective for interim and
annual periods ending after June 15, 2011. We adopted the
new disclosures in the amendment, excluding the disclosures
related to troubled debt restructurings which have been delayed,
during the year ended December 31, 2010. For purposes of
our credit quality and allowance for credit losses disclosures,
we have determined we have one portfolio segment (consumer
receivables) and our products within this portfolio segment
represent our receivable classes. See Note 7,
Receivables, and Note 9, Credit Loss
Reserves, in these consolidated financial statements for
the expanded disclosure.
|
|
3.
|
Discontinued
Operations
|
2010
Discontinued Operations:
Taxpayer Financial Services During the third quarter of
2010, the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) announced
it would stop providing information regarding certain unpaid
obligations of a taxpayer (the Debt Indicator),
which
16
HSBC Finance Corporation
has historically served as a significant part of our
underwriting process in our Taxpayer Financial Services
(TFS) business. We determined that, without use of
the Debt Indicator, we could no longer offer the product that
has historically accounted for the substantial majority of our
TFS loan production and that we might not be able to offer the
remaining products available under the program in a safe and
sound manner. As a result, in December 2010, it was determined
that we would not offer any tax refund anticipation loans or
related products for the 2011 tax season and we exited the TFS
business. As a result of this decision, our TFS business, which
was previously considered a non-core business, is now reported
in discontinued operations. During the fourth quarter of 2010 we
recorded closure costs of $25 million which primarily
reflect severance costs and the write off of certain pre-paid
assets which are included as a component of loss from
discontinued operations. As a result of this transaction, our
TFS business, previously included in the All Other
caption within our segment reporting, is now reported as
discontinued operations.
The following summarizes the operating results of our TFS
business for the periods presented:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
Net interest income and other
revenues(1)
|
|
$
|
68
|
|
|
$
|
106
|
|
|
$
|
158
|
|
Income from discontinued operations before income tax
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
62
|
|
|
|
103
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Interest expense, which is included
as a component of net interest income, has been allocated to
discontinued operations in accordance with our existing internal
transfer pricing policy. This policy uses match funding based on
the expected lives of the assets and liabilities of the business
at the time of origination, subject to periodic review, as
demonstrated by the expected cash flows and re-pricing
characteristics of the underlying assets.
|
The following summarizes the assets and liabilities of our TFS
business at December 31, 2010 and 2009 which are now
reported as Assets of discontinued operations and Liabilities of
discontinued operations in our consolidated balance sheet.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31,
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
|
Deferred income tax, net
|
|
$
|
3
|
|
|
$
|
4
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
|
76
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets of discontinued operations
|
|
$
|
58
|
|
|
$
|
80
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other liabilities
|
|
$
|
10
|
|
|
$
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities of discontinued operations
|
|
$
|
10
|
|
|
$
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Auto Finance In March 2010, we sold our auto finance
receivable servicing operations as well as auto finance
receivables with a carrying value of $927 million, of which
$379 million was purchased at estimated fair value from
HSBC Bank USA immediately prior to the sale, to Santander
Consumer USA Inc. (SC USA) for $930 million in
cash. Under the terms of the agreement, our auto finance
servicing facilities in San Diego, California and
Lewisville, Texas were assigned to SC USA at the time of close
and the majority of the employees from those locations were
offered the opportunity to transfer to SC USA. SC USA then
serviced the remainder of our auto finance receivable portfolio.
As the receivables sold were previously classified as held for
sale and written down to fair value, we recorded a gain of
$5 million ($3 million after-tax) during the first
quarter of 2010 which primarily related to the sale of the auto
servicing platform and reversal of certain accruals related to
leases assumed by SC USA.
In August 2010, we sold the remainder of our auto finance
receivable portfolio with an outstanding principal balance of
$2.6 billion at the time of sale and other related assets
to SC USA. The aggregate sales price for the auto finance
receivables and other related assets was $2.5 billion which
included the transfer of $431 million of indebtedness
secured by auto finance receivables, resulting in net cash
proceeds of $2.1 billion. We recorded a net loss as a
result of this transaction of $43 million ($28 million
after-tax) during the third quarter of 2010. This net loss
17
HSBC Finance Corporation
is included as a component of loss from discontinued operations.
Severance costs recorded as a result of this transaction were
less than $1 million and are included as a component of
loss from discontinued operations. As a result of this
transaction, our Auto Finance business, previously included in
our Consumer Segment, is now reported as discontinued operations.
The following summarizes the operating results of our Auto
Finance business for the periods presented:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
Net interest income and other
revenues(1)
|
|
$
|
219
|
|
|
$
|
548
|
|
|
$
|
960
|
|
Loss from discontinued operations before income tax
|
|
|
(46
|
)
|
|
|
(33
|
)
|
|
|
(324
|
)
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Interest expense, which is included
as a component of net interest income, has been allocated to
discontinued operations in accordance with our existing internal
transfer pricing policy. This policy uses match funding based on
the expected lives of the assets and liabilities of the business
at the time of origination, subject to periodic review, as
demonstrated by the expected cash flows and re-pricing
characteristics of the underlying assets.
|
The following summarizes the assets and liabilities of our Auto
Finance business at December 31, 2010 and 2009 which are
now reported as Assets of discontinued operations and
Liabilities of discontinued operations in our consolidated
balance sheet. Other assets of discontinued operations at
December 31, 2010 reflects current income taxes receivable
on our Auto Finance business for the 2010 tax year.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31,
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
22
|
|
Receivables, net of credit loss reserves of $172 million at
December 31, 2009
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
3,823
|
|
Receivables held for sale
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
533
|
|
Deferred income tax, net
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
123
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
134
|
|
|
|
327
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets of discontinued operations
|
|
$
|
138
|
|
|
$
|
4,828
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
778
|
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities of discontinued operations
|
|
$
|
7
|
|
|
$
|
807
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prior to the sale of our remaining auto finance receivable
portfolio as discussed above, in January 2009, we sold certain
auto finance receivables with an aggregate outstanding principal
balance of $3.0 billion to HSBC Bank USA for an aggregate
sales price of $2.8 billion. The sales price was based on
an independent valuation opinion based on the fair values of the
receivable in September 2008, the date the transaction terms
were agreed upon. As a result, in the first quarter of 2009 we
recorded a gain of $7 million ($4 million after-tax)
on the sale of these auto finance receivables which is now
reflected as a component of loss from discontinued operations.
We continued to service these auto finance receivables for HSBC
Bank USA for a fee until the sale of our auto finance servicing
operations in March 2010.
2008
Discontinued Operations:
United Kingdom In May 2008, we sold all of the common
stock of Household International Europe, the holding company for
our United Kingdom operations (U.K. Operations) to
HSBC Overseas Holdings (UK) Limited (HOHU), a
subsidiary of HSBC. The sales price was GBP 181 million
(equivalent to approximately $359 million at the time of
sale). At the time of the sale, the assets of the U.K.
Operations consisted primarily of net receivables of
$4.6 billion and the liabilities consisted primarily of
amounts due to HSBC affiliates of $3.6 billion. As a result
of this transaction, HOHU assumed the liabilities of our U.K.
Operations outstanding at the time of the sale. Because the sale
was between affiliates under common control, the book value of
the investment in our U.K. Operations in
18
HSBC Finance Corporation
excess of the consideration received at the time of sale which
totaled $576 million was recorded as a decrease to common
shareholders equity. Of this amount, $196 million was
reflected as a decrease to additional
paid-in-capital
and $380 million was reflected as a decrease to other
comprehensive income (loss), primarily related to foreign
currency translation adjustments. There was no tax benefit
recorded as a result of this transaction. Our U.K. Operations
were previously reported in the International Segment.
Prior to the sale of our entire U.K. operations in May 2008, we
had disposed of our U.K. insurance operations in November 2007
and our European operations in November 2006 which were part of
our U.K. Operations as well as our U.K. credit card business in
December 2005. None of these individual transactions previously
qualified for discontinued operations presentation. However, as
a result of reclassifying our entire remaining U.K. Operations
as discontinued, the results of these previous dispositions are
now included in our discontinued operation results for all
historical periods.
The following summarizes the operating results of our U.K.
Operations for the periods presented:
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
Net interest income and other revenues
|
|
$
|
190
|
|
Loss from discontinued operations before income tax
|
|
|
(14
|
)
|
Canada On November 30, 2008, we sold the common
stock of HSBC Financial Corporation Limited, the holding company
for our Canadian business (Canadian Operations) to
HSBC Bank Canada. The sales price was approximately
$279 million (based on the exchange rate on the date of
sale). At the time of the sale, the assets of the Canadian
Operations consisted primarily of net receivables of
$3.1 billion,
available-for-sale
securities of $98 million and goodwill of $65 million.
Liabilities at the time of the sale consisted primarily of
long-term debt of $3.1 billion. As a result of this
transaction, HSBC Bank Canada assumed the liabilities of our
Canadian Operations outstanding at the time of the sale.
However, we continue to guarantee the long-term and medium-term
notes issued by our Canadian business prior to the sale. As of
December 31, 2010, the outstanding balance of the
guaranteed notes was $1.5 billion and the latest scheduled
maturity of the notes is May 2012. Because the sale was between
affiliates under common control, the book value of the
investment in our Canadian Operations in excess of the
consideration received at the time of sale which totaled
$40 million was recorded as a decrease to common
shareholders equity. Of this amount, $46 million was
reflected as a decrease to additional
paid-in-capital
and $6 million was reflected as an increase to other
comprehensive income (loss), primarily related to foreign
currency translation adjustments. There was no tax benefit
recorded as a result of this transaction. Our Canadian
Operations were previously reported in the International Segment.
The following summarizes the operating results of our Canadian
Operations for the periods presented:
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
Net interest income and other revenues
|
|
$
|
486
|
|
Income from discontinued operations before income tax
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
4.
|
Receivable
Portfolio Sales to HSBC Bank USA
|
In January 2009, we sold our General Motors MasterCard
receivable portfolio (GM Portfolio) and our Union
Plus MasterCard/Visa receivable portfolio (UP
Portfolio) with an aggregate outstanding principal balance
of $6.3 billion and $6.1 billion, respectively, to
HSBC Bank USA. The aggregate sales price for the GM and UP
Portfolios was $12.2 billion which included the transfer of
approximately $6.1 billion of indebtedness, resulting in
net cash proceeds of $6.1 billion. The sales price was
determined based on independent valuation opinions based on the
fair values of the pool of receivables in late November and
early December 2008, the dates the transaction terms were agreed
upon, respectively. As a result, during the first quarter of
2009 we recorded a gain of $130 million ($84 million
after-tax) on the sale of the GM and UP Portfolios. This gain
was partially offset by a loss of $(80) million
($(51) million after-tax) recorded on the termination of
cash flow hedges associated with the
19
HSBC Finance Corporation
$6.1 billion of indebtedness transferred to HSBC Bank USA
as part of these transactions. We retained the customer account
relationships and by agreement we sell additional receivable
originations generated under existing and future accounts to
HSBC Bank USA on a daily basis at a sales price for each type of
portfolio determined using a fair value which is calculated
semi-annually. We continue to service the receivables sold to
HSBC Bank USA for a fee.
As it relates to our discontinued auto finance operations, in
January 2009, we sold certain auto finance receivables with an
aggregate outstanding principal balance of $3.0 billion to
HSBC Bank USA for an aggregate sales price of $2.8 billion.
See Note 3, Discontinued Operations, for
additional information.
See Note 23, Related Party Transactions, for
further discussion of the daily receivable sales to HSBC Bank
USA and how fair value is determined.
As discussed in prior filings, in prior years we performed
several comprehensive evaluations of the strategies and
opportunities of our operations. As a result of these various
evaluations, we discontinued all new customer account
originations except in our credit card business. There were no
strategic initiatives during 2010 related to our continuing
operations. Summarized below are a number of strategic actions
which were undertaken in mid-2007, 2008 and 2009 for our
continuing operations as a result of our evaluations:
2009
Strategic
Initiatives During
2009, we undertook a number of actions including the following:
|
|
|
|
>
|
Throughout 2009, we decided to exit certain lease arrangements
and consolidate a variety of locations across the United States.
The process of closing and consolidating these facilities, which
began during the second quarter of 2009, was completed during
the fourth quarter of 2010. As a result, we have exited certain
facilities
and/or
significantly reduced our occupancy space in the following
locations: Bridgewater, New Jersey; Minnetonka, Minnesota; Wood
Dale, Illinois; Elmhurst, Illinois; Sioux Falls, South Dakota
and Tampa, Florida. Additionally, we have consolidated our
operations in Virginia Beach, Virginia into our Chesapeake,
Virginia facility and consolidated certain servicing functions
previously performed in Brandon, Florida to facilities in
Buffalo, New York and Elmhurst, Illinois.
|
|
|
>
|
In late February 2009, we decided to discontinue new customer
account originations for all products by our Consumer Lending
business and close all branch offices.
|
20
HSBC Finance Corporation
Summary of restructuring liability related to 2009
strategic initiatives The following
summarizes the changes in the restructure liability during the
year ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively,
relating to actions implemented during 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One-Time
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Termination and
|
|
|
Lease Termination
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Employee
|
|
|
and Associated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefits
|
|
|
Costs
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restructuring liability at January 1, 2010
|
|
$
|
10
|
|
|
$
|
12
|
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
|
$
|
24
|
|
Restructuring costs recorded during the period
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
Restructuring costs paid during the period
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(17
|
)
|
Adjustments to the restructure liability during the period
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restructure liability at December 31, 2010
|
|
$
|
4
|
|
|
$
|
6
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restructuring liability at January 1, 2009
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
Restructuring costs recorded during the period
|
|
|
79
|
|
|
|
57
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
147
|
|
Restructuring costs paid during the period
|
|
|
(69
|
)
|
|
|
(45
|
)
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
|
(123
|
)
|
Adjustments to the restructure liability during the period
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restructure liability at December 31, 2009
|
|
$
|
10
|
|
|
$
|
12
|
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
|
$
|
24
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 Strategic Initiatives During 2008,
we undertook a number of actions including the following:
|
|
|
|
>
|
During the third quarter of 2008, closed servicing facilities
located in Jacksonville, Florida and White Marsh, Maryland in
our Card and Retail Services business and redeployed these
activities to other facilities in our Card and Retail Services
business.
|
|
|
>
|
Reduced headcount in our Card and Retail Services business
during the fourth quarter of 2008; and
|
|
|
>
|
Ceased operations of Solstice Capital Group, Inc, a subsidiary
of our Consumer Lending business which originated real estate
secured receivables for resale.
|
21
HSBC Finance Corporation
Summary of Restructuring Liability Related to 2008
Strategic Initiatives The following
summarizes the changes in the restructure liability during the
years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008 relating to
the actions implemented during 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One-Time
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Termination and
|
|
|
Lease Termination
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Employee
|
|
|
and Associated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefits
|
|
|
Costs
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restructure liability at January 1, 2010
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
Restructuring costs paid during the period
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restructure liability at December 31, 2010
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restructure liability at January 1, 2009
|
|
$
|
6
|
|
|
$
|
4
|
|
|
$
|
10
|
|
Restructuring costs paid during the period
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
Adjustments to the restructuring liability during the period
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restructure liability at December 31, 2009
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restructure liability at January 1, 2008
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
Restructuring costs recorded during the period
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
Restructuring costs paid during the period
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restructure liability at December 31, 2008
|
|
$
|
6
|
|
|
$
|
4
|
|
|
$
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007 Strategic Initiatives Beginning in
mid-2007 we undertook a number of actions including the
following:
|
|
|
|
>
|
Discontinued correspondent channel acquisitions of our Mortgage
Services business;
|
|
|
>
|
Ceased operations of Decision One Mortgage Company;
|
|
|
>
|
Reduced Consumer Lending branch network to approximately 1,000
branches at December 31, 2007; and
|
|
|
>
|
Closed our loan underwriting, processing and collections center
in Carmel, Indiana.
|
22
HSBC Finance Corporation
Summary of Restructuring Liability Related to 2007
Strategic Initiatives The following
summarizes the changes in the restructure liability during the
years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008 relating to
the actions implemented during 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One-Time
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Termination and
|
|
|
Lease Termination
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Employee
|
|
|
and Associated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefits
|
|
|
Costs
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restructure liability at January 1, 2010
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
14
|
|
|
$
|
14
|
|
Adjustments to the restructure liability during the period
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(14
|
)
|
|
|
(14
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restructure liability at December 31, 2010
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restructure liability at January 1, 2009
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
17
|
|
|
$
|
18
|
|
Restructuring costs paid during the period
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restructure liability at December 31, 2009
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
14
|
|
|
$
|
14
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restructure liability at January 1, 2008
|
|
$
|
17
|
|
|
$
|
37
|
|
|
$
|
54
|
|
Restructuring costs recorded during the period
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
Restructuring costs paid during the period
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
|
(21
|
)
|
|
|
(30
|
)
|
Adjustments to the restructure liability during the period
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restructure liability at December 31, 2008
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
17
|
|
|
$
|
18
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23
HSBC Finance Corporation
Summary of Strategic Initiatives The
following table summarizes the net cash and non-cash expenses
recorded for all restructuring activities during the years ended
December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One-Time
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Termination and
|
|
|
Lease Termination
|
|
|
|
|
|
and Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Employee
|
|
|
and Associated
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Cash
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefits(1)
|
|
|
Costs(2)
|
|
|
Other(3)
|
|
|
Adjustments(4)
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 Facility Closures
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
5
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
5
|
|
2009 Consumer Lending Closure
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
2007 Mortgage Services initiatives
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(14
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(14
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total expense (expense release)
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
(10
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2
|
)
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
(11
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 Facility Closures
|
|
$
|
6
|
|
|
$
|
4
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
3
|
|
|
$
|
13
|
|
2009 Consumer Lending
Closure(5)
|
|
|
73
|
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
151
|
|
2008 Card and Retail Services initiatives
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total expense (expense release)
|
|
$
|
79
|
|
|
$
|
55
|
|
|
$
|
11
|
|
|
$
|
17
|
|
|
$
|
162
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 Card and Retail Services initiatives
|
|
$
|
9
|
|
|
$
|
6
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
15
|
|
2008 Solstice Closure
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
2007 Mortgage Services initiatives
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
2007 Consumer Lending initiatives
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
2007 Carmel Facility closure
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total expense (expense release)
|
|
$
|
3
|
|
|
$
|
7
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
One-time termination and other
employee benefits are included as a component of Salaries and
employee benefits in the consolidated statement of income (loss).
|
|
(2) |
|
Lease termination and associated
costs are included as a component of Occupancy and equipment
expenses in the consolidated statement of income (loss).
|
|
(3) |
|
The other expenses are included as
a component of Other servicing and administrative expenses in
the consolidated statement of income (loss).
|
|
(4) |
|
Includes $32 million fixed
asset write-offs during 2009, which were recorded as a component
of Other servicing and administrative expenses in the
consolidated statement of income (loss). Other expenses during
2009 also includes $3 million relating to stock based
compensation and other benefits, a curtailment gain of
$16 million and a reduction of pension expense of
$2 million which were recorded as a component of Salaries
and employee benefits in the consolidated statement of income
(loss).
|
|
(5) |
|
Excludes intangible asset
impairment charges of $14 million recorded during 2009.
|
24
HSBC Finance Corporation
Securities consisted of the following
available-for-sale
investments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Credit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Component
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized
|
|
|
of OTTI
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
December 31, 2010
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Securities(4)
|
|
|
Gains
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury
|
|
$
|
341
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
8
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
349
|
|
U.S. government sponsored
enterprises(1)
|
|
|
282
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
285
|
|
U.S. government agency issued or guaranteed
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
Obligations of U.S. states and political subdivisions
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
Asset-backed
securities(2)
|
|
|
65
|
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
60
|
|
U.S. corporate debt
securities(3)
|
|
|
1,714
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
94
|
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
1,802
|
|
Foreign debt
securities(5)
|
|
|
424
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
442
|
|
Equity securities
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
Money market funds
|
|
|
353
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
353
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal
|
|
|
3,227
|
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
129
|
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
3,341
|
|
Accrued investment income
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total securities
available-for-sale
|
|
$
|
3,257
|
|
|
$
|
(7
|
)
|
|
$
|
129
|
|
|
$
|
(8
|
)
|
|
$
|
3,371
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Credit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Component
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized
|
|
|
of OTTI
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
December 31, 2009
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Securities(4)
|
|
|
Gains
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury
|
|
$
|
196
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
(1
|
)
|
|
$
|
196
|
|
U.S. government sponsored
enterprises(1)
|
|
|
95
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
97
|
|
U.S. government agency issued or guaranteed
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
Obligations of U.S. states and political subdivisions
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
Asset-backed
securities(2)
|
|
|
94
|
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
83
|
|
U.S. corporate debt
securities(3)
|
|
|
1,684
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
|
(20
|
)
|
|
|
1,724
|
|
Foreign debt
securities(5)
|
|
|
351
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
366
|
|
Equity securities
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
Money market funds
|
|
|
627
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
627
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal
|
|
|
3,110
|
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
|
|
83
|
|
|
|
(24
|
)
|
|
|
3,158
|
|
Accrued investment income
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total securities
available-for-sale
|
|
$
|
3,139
|
|
|
$
|
(11
|
)
|
|
$
|
83
|
|
|
$
|
(24
|
)
|
|
$
|
3,187
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes $33 million and
$65 million of mortgage-backed securities issued by the
Federal National Mortgage Association and the Federal Home Loan
Mortgage Corporation as of December 31, 2010 and 2009,
respectively.
|
|
(2) |
|
At December 31, 2010 and 2009,
the majority of our asset-backed securities are residential
mortgage-backed securities.
|
|
(3) |
|
At December 31, 2010 and 2009,
the majority of our U.S. corporate debt securities represent
investments in the financial services, consumer products,
healthcare and industrials sectors.
|
25
HSBC Finance Corporation
|
|
|
(4) |
|
For
available-for-sale
debt securities which are
other-than-temporarily
impaired, the non-credit loss component of
other-than-temporary
impairment is recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income
beginning in 2009.
|
|
(5) |
|
There were no foreign debt
securities issued by the governments of Portugal, Ireland,
Italy, Greece or Spain at December 31, 2010 or 2009.
|
A summary of gross unrealized losses and related fair values as
of December 31, 2010 and 2009, classified as to the length
of time the losses have existed follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less Than One Year
|
|
|
Greater Than One Year
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
Aggregate
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
Aggregate
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Fair Value of
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Fair Value of
|
|
December 31, 2010
|
|
Securities
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Investments
|
|
|
Securities
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
(dollars are in millions)
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
25
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
U.S. government sponsored enterprises
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
139
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
U.S. government agency issued or guaranteed
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Obligations of U.S. states and political subdivisions
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Asset-backed securities
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
18
|
|
U.S. corporate debt securities
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
209
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
23
|
|
Foreign debt securities
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Equity Securities
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
143
|
|
|
$
|
(7
|
)
|
|
$
|
438
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
$
|
(8
|
)
|
|
$
|
41
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less Than One Year
|
|
|
Greater Than One Year
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
Aggregate
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
Aggregate
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Fair Value of
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Fair Value of
|
|
December 31, 2009
|
|
Securities
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Investments
|
|
|
Securities
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
(dollars are in millions)
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
$
|
(1
|
)
|
|
$
|
97
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
U.S. government sponsored enterprises
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
4
|
|
U.S. government agency issued or guaranteed
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Obligations of U.S. states and political subdivisions
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Asset-backed securities
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
34
|
|
U.S. corporate debt securities
|
|
|
59
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
170
|
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
(17
|
)
|
|
|
150
|
|
Foreign debt securities
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
96
|
|
|
$
|
(5
|
)
|
|
$
|
315
|
|
|
|
70
|
|
|
$
|
(30
|
)
|
|
$
|
188
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross unrealized losses decreased during 2010 primarily due to
the impact of lower interest rates. We have reviewed our
securities for which there is an unrealized loss in accordance
with our accounting policies for
other-than-temporary
impairment (OTTI). As a result of this review, OTTI
of less than $1 million was recognized in earnings on
certain debt securities during 2010. In addition, we recognized
a recovery in accumulated other comprehensive income relating to
the non-credit component of
other-than-temporary
impairment previously recognized in accumulated other
comprehensive income totaling $4 million during 2010.
Our decision in the first quarter of 2009 to discontinue new
customer account originations in our Consumer Lending business
adversely impacted certain insurance subsidiaries that held
perpetual preferred securities. Therefore,
26
HSBC Finance Corporation
during the first quarter of 2009 we determined it was
more-likely-than-not that we would be required to sell the
portfolio of perpetual preferred securities prior to recovery of
amortized cost and, therefore, these securities were deemed to
be
other-than-temporarily
impaired. We subsequently sold our entire portfolio of perpetual
preferred securities during the second quarter of 2009. During
2009, we recorded $20 million of impairment losses related
to these perpetual preferred securities as a component of
investment income. The entire unrealized loss was recorded in
earnings in accordance with new accounting guidance which we
early adopted effective January 1, 2009 related to the
recognition of
other-than-temporary
impairment and is described more fully below, as we determined
it was more-likely-than-not that we would be required to sell
the portfolio of perpetual preferred securities prior to
recovery of amortized cost. Additionally, during the fourth
quarter of 2009, certain asset-backed securities were determined
to be
other-than-temporarily
impaired which resulted in an
other-than-temporary
impairment of $16 million being recognized on these
investments. The credit loss component of the impairment on
these debt securities which totaled $5 million was recorded
as a component of OTTI losses in the consolidated statement of
income (loss), while the remaining non-credit portion of the
OTTI loss which totaled $11 million was recognized in other
comprehensive income (loss).
We do not consider any other securities to be
other-than-temporarily
impaired because we expect to recover the entire amortized cost
basis of the securities and we neither intend to nor expect to
be required to sell the securities prior to recovery, even if
that equates to holding securities until their individual
maturities. However, additional
other-than-temporary
impairments may occur in future periods if the credit quality of
the securities deteriorates.
On-Going Assessment for
Other-Than-Temporary
Impairment On a quarterly basis, we perform
an assessment to determine whether there have been any events or
economic circumstances to indicate that a security with an
unrealized loss has suffered
other-than-temporary
impairment. A debt security is considered impaired if the fair
value is less than its amortized cost basis at the reporting
date. If impaired, we then assess whether the unrealized loss is
other-than-temporary.
An unrealized loss is generally deemed to be
other-than-temporary
and a credit loss is deemed to exist if the present value of the
expected future cash flows is less than the amortized cost basis
of the debt security. As a result, the credit loss component of
an
other-than-temporary
impairment write-down for debt securities is recorded in
earnings while the remaining portion of the impairment loss is
recognized net of tax in other comprehensive income (loss)
provided we do not intend to sell the underlying debt security
and it is more-likely-than-not that we would not have to sell
the debt security prior to recovery.
For all our debt securities, as of the reporting date we do not
have the intention to sell these securities and believe we will
not be required to sell these securities for contractual,
regulatory or liquidity reasons.
We consider the following factors in determining whether a
credit loss exists and the period over which the debt security
is expected to recover:
|
|
|
|
|
The length of time and the extent to which the fair value has
been less than the amortized cost basis;
|
|
|
|
The level of credit enhancement provided by the structure which
includes, but is not limited to, credit subordination positions,
overcollateralization, protective triggers and financial
guarantees provided by monoline wraps;
|
|
|
|
Changes in the near term prospects of the issuer or underlying
collateral of a security, such as changes in default rates, loss
severities given default and significant changes in prepayment
assumptions;
|
|
|
|
The level of excess cash flows generated from the underlying
collateral supporting the principal and interest payments of the
debt securities; and
|
|
|
|
Any adverse change to the credit conditions of the issuer or the
security such as credit downgrades by the rating agencies.
|
At December 31, 2010, approximately 92 percent of our
corporate debt securities are rated A- or better and
approximately 66 percent of our asset-backed securities,
which totaled $60 million are rated AAA.
Although
27
HSBC Finance Corporation
OTTI of less than $1 million was recorded in earnings
during 2010, without a sustained economic recovery, additional
other-than-temporary
impairments may occur in future periods.
Proceeds from the sale, call or redemption of
available-for-sale
investments totaled $216 million, $171 million and
$229 million during 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively. We
realized gross gains of $7 million, $13 million and
$5 million during 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively. We
realized gross losses of less than $1 million,
$3 million and $14 million during during 2010, 2009
and 2008, respectively.
Contractual maturities and yields on investments in debt
securities for those with set maturities were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Due
|
|
|
After 1
|
|
|
After 5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Within
|
|
|
but Within
|
|
|
but Within
|
|
|
After
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2010
|
|
1 Year
|
|
|
5 Years
|
|
|
10 Years
|
|
|
10 Years
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
(dollars are in millions)
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized cost
|
|
$
|
108
|
|
|
$
|
232
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
341
|
|
Fair value
|
|
|
109
|
|
|
|
239
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
349
|
|
Yield(1)
|
|
|
.81
|
%
|
|
|
2.19
|
%
|
|
|
4.96
|
%
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1.76
|
%
|
U.S. government sponsored enterprises:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized cost
|
|
$
|
109
|
|
|
$
|
114
|
|
|
$
|
32
|
|
|
$
|
27
|
|
|
$
|
282
|
|
Fair value
|
|
|
109
|
|
|
|
113
|
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
285
|
|
Yield(1)
|
|
|
.26
|
%
|
|
|
1.34
|
%
|
|
|
4.71
|
%
|
|
|
4.80
|
%
|
|
|
1.64
|
%
|
U.S. government agency issued or guaranteed:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized cost
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
10
|
|
|
$
|
10
|
|
Fair value
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
Yield(1)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
5.01
|
%
|
|
|
5.01
|
%
|
Obligations of U.S. states and political subdivisions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized cost
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
11
|
|
|
$
|
18
|
|
|
$
|
29
|
|
Fair value
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
Yield(1)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
4.09
|
%
|
|
|
4.06
|
%
|
|
|
4.07
|
%
|
Asset-backed securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized cost
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
27
|
|
|
$
|
5
|
|
|
$
|
33
|
|
|
$
|
65
|
|
Fair value
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
60
|
|
Yield(1)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
4.86
|
%
|
|
|
6.06
|
%
|
|
|
2.12
|
%
|
|
|
3.56
|
%
|
U.S. corporate debt securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized cost
|
|
$
|
112
|
|
|
$
|
834
|
|
|
$
|
212
|
|
|
$
|
556
|
|
|
$
|
1,714
|
|
Fair value
|
|
|
114
|
|
|
|
879
|
|
|
|
224
|
|
|
|
585
|
|
|
|
1,802
|
|
Yield(1)
|
|
|
4.58
|
%
|
|
|
4.12
|
%
|
|
|
4.56
|
%
|
|
|
5.35
|
%
|
|
|
4.61
|
%
|
Foreign debt securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized cost
|
|
$
|
18
|
|
|
$
|
319
|
|
|
$
|
42
|
|
|
$
|
45
|
|
|
$
|
424
|
|
Fair value
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
332
|
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
|
442
|
|
Yield(1)
|
|
|
3.09
|
%
|
|
|
3.73
|
%
|
|
|
3.97
|
%
|
|
|
6.26
|
%
|
|
|
4.00
|
%
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Computed by dividing annualized
interest by the amortized cost of respective investment
securities.
|
28
HSBC Finance Corporation
Receivables consisted of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31,
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
|
Real estate secured:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First lien
|
|
$
|
43,859
|
|
|
$
|
51,988
|
|
Second lien
|
|
|
5,477
|
|
|
|
7,547
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total real estate secured
|
|
|
49,336
|
|
|
|
59,535
|
|
Credit card
|
|
|
9,897
|
|
|
|
11,626
|
|
Personal non-credit card
|
|
|
7,117
|
|
|
|
10,486
|
|
Commercial and other
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total receivables
|
|
|
66,383
|
|
|
|
81,697
|
|
HSBC acquisition purchase accounting fair value adjustments
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
Accrued finance income
|
|
|
1,521
|
|
|
|
1,895
|
|
Credit loss reserve for owned receivables
|
|
|
(6,491
|
)
|
|
|
(9,091
|
)
|
Unearned credit insurance premiums and claims reserves
|
|
|
(123
|
)
|
|
|
(182
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total receivables, net
|
|
$
|
61,333
|
|
|
$
|
74,308
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
HSBC acquisition purchase accounting fair value adjustments
represent adjustments which have been pushed down to
record our receivables at fair value at the date of acquisition
by HSBC.
Net deferred origination fees, excluding MasterCard and Visa,
totaled $277 million and $359 million at
December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. MasterCard and
Visa annual fees are netted with direct lending costs, deferred,
and amortized on a straight-line basis over one year. Deferred
MasterCard and Visa annual fees, net of direct lending costs
related to these receivables, for continuing operations totaled
$161 million and $140 million at December 31,
2010 and 2009, respectfully.
At December 31, 2010 and 2009, we had a net unamortized
premium on our receivables of $254 million and
$369 million, respectively. Unearned income on personal
non-credit card receivables totaled $30 million and
$96 million at December 31, 2010 and 2009,
respectively.
Purchased Receivable Portfolios In November
2006, we acquired $2.5 billion of real estate secured
receivables from Champion Mortgage (Champion) a
division of KeyBank, N.A. Receivables purchased for which at the
time of acquisition there was evidence of deterioration in
credit quality since origination, for which it was probable that
all contractually required payments would not be collected and
for which the associated line of credit had been closed, if
applicable, were recorded at an amount dependent upon the cash
flows expected to be collected at the time of acquisition
(Purchased Credit-Impaired Receivables). The
carrying amount of Champion real estate secured receivables
subject to these accounting requirements was $48 million
and $36 million at December 31, 2010 and 2009,
respectively, and is included in the real estate secured
receivables in the table above. The remaining accretable yield
for the Champion real estate secured receivables subject to
these accounting requirements was $17 million and
$13 million at December 31, 2010 and 2009,
respectively.
Collateralized Funding Transactions We
currently have secured conduit credit facilities with commercial
banks which provide for secured financings of receivables on a
revolving basis totaling $650 million and $400 million
at December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. At
December 31, 2010 and 2009, $455 million and
$400 million, respectively, were available under these
facilities. These facilities mature in the second quarter of
2011 and are renewable at the banks option. The amount
available under these facilities will vary based on the timing
and volume of secured financing transactions and as part of our
ongoing liquidity management plans.
29
HSBC Finance Corporation
Secured financings issued under our current conduit credit
facilities as well as secured financings previously issued under
public trusts of $4.1 billion at December 31, 2010 are
secured by $6.3 billion of closed-end real estate secured
and credit card receivables. Secured financings of
$4.7 billion at December 31, 2009 are secured by
$6.8 billion of closed-end real estate secured receivables.
Age Analysis of Past Due Receivables The
following table summarizes the past due status of our
receivables at December 31, 2010. The aging of past due
amounts are determined based on the contractual delinquency
status of payments made under the receivable. An account is
generally considered to be contractually delinquent when
payments have not been made in accordance with the loan terms.
Delinquency status may be affected by customer account
management policies and practices such as re-age or
modification. Additionally, delinquency status is also impacted
by payment percentage requirements which vary between servicing
platforms.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Days Past
Due(1)
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
129 days
|
|
|
3089 days
|
|
|
>90 days
|
|
|
Past
Due(1)
|
|
|
Current
|
|
|
Receivables
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
|
Real estate secured:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First lien
|
|
$
|
7,024
|
|
|
$
|
4,909
|
|
|
$
|
5,977
|
|
|
$
|
17,910
|
|
|
$
|
25,949
|
|
|
$
|
43,859
|
|
Second lien
|
|
|
935
|
|
|
|
568
|
|
|
|
421
|
|
|
|
1,924
|
|
|
|
3,553
|
|
|
|
5,477
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total real estate secured
|
|
|
7,959
|
|
|
|
5,477
|
|
|
|
6,398
|
|
|
|
19,834
|
|
|
|
29,502
|
|
|
|
49,336
|
|
Credit card
|
|
|
473
|
|
|
|
363
|
|
|
|
437
|
|
|
|
1,273
|
|
|
|
8,624
|
|
|
|
9,897
|
|
Personal non-credit card
|
|
|
968
|
|
|
|
604
|
|
|
|
507
|
|
|
|
2,079
|
|
|
|
5,038
|
|
|
|
7,117
|
|
Commercial and other
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total receivables
|
|
$
|
9,400
|
|
|
$
|
6,444
|
|
|
$
|
7,342
|
|
|
$
|
23,186
|
|
|
$
|
43,197
|
|
|
$
|
66,383
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The receivable balances included in
this table reflects the principal amount outstanding on the loan
and various basis adjustments to the loan such as deferred fees
and costs on originated loans, purchase accounting fair value
adjustments and premiums or discounts on purchased loans.
However, these basis adjustments to the loans are excluded in
other presentations regarding delinquent account balances.
|
Contractual maturities Contractual maturities
of our receivables were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
2013
|
|
|
2014
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
|
Real estate secured
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First lien
|
|
$
|
117
|
|
|
$
|
33
|
|
|
$
|
55
|
|
|
$
|
100
|
|
|
$
|
118
|
|
|
$
|
43,436
|
|
|
$
|
43,859
|
|
Second lien
|
|
|
76
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
5,263
|
|
|
|
5,477
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total real estate secured
|
|
|
193
|
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
|
91
|
|
|
|
145
|
|
|
|
152
|
|
|
|
48,699
|
|
|
|
49,336
|
|
Credit
card(1)
|
|
|
5,236
|
|
|
|
1,974
|
|
|
|
1,009
|
|
|
|
568
|
|
|
|
346
|
|
|
|
764
|
|
|
|
9,897
|
|
Personal non-credit card
|
|
|
278
|
|
|
|
190
|
|
|
|
188
|
|
|
|
95
|
|
|
|
59
|
|
|
|
6,307
|
|
|
|
7,117
|
|
Commercial and other
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
5,717
|
|
|
$
|
2,220
|
|
|
$
|
1,288
|
|
|
$
|
808
|
|
|
$
|
557
|
|
|
$
|
55,793
|
|
|
$
|
66,383
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
As credit card receivables do not
have stated contractual maturities, the table reflects estimates
based on historical repayment patterns.
|
As a substantial portion of consumer receivables, based on our
experience, will be renewed or repaid prior to contractual
maturity, the above maturity schedule should not be regarded as
a forecast of future cash collections.
30
HSBC Finance Corporation
The following table summarizes contractual maturities of
receivables due after one year by repricing characteristic:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Over 1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
But Within
|
|
|
Over
|
|
At December 31, 2010
|
|
5 Years
|
|
|
5 Years
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
|
Receivables at predetermined interest rates
|
|
$
|
1,641
|
|
|
$
|
47,121
|
|
Receivables at floating or adjustable rates
|
|
|
3,225
|
|
|
|
8,679
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
4,866
|
|
|
$
|
55,800
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonaccrual receivables Nonaccrual consumer
receivables reflect all non-credit card receivables which are 90
or more days contractually delinquent and totaled
$6.9 billion and $8.0 billion at December 31,
2010 and 2009, respectively. Nonaccrual receivables do not
include receivables which have made qualifying payments and have
been re-aged and the contractual delinquency status reset to
current as such activity, in our judgment, evidences continued
payment probability. If a re-aged loan subsequently experiences
payment default and becomes 90 or more days contractually
delinquent, it will be reported as nonaccrual. Nonaccrual
receivable also do not include credit card receivables which,
consistent with industry practice, continue to accrue until
charge-off. Interest income that was not recorded but would have
been recorded if such nonaccrual receivables had been current
and in accordance with contractual terms was approximately
$339 million in 2010 and $302 million in 2009.
Interest income that was included in finance and other interest
income prior to these loans being placed on nonaccrual status
was approximately $489 million in 2010 and
$620 million in 2009 of which portions have been
written-off. For an analysis of reserves for credit losses, see
Note 9, Credit Loss Reserves.
Nonaccrual receivables and accruing receivables 90 or more days
delinquent are summarized in the following table.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31,
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
|
Nonaccrual receivables:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate
secured(1)(2)
|
|
$
|
6,356
|
|
|
$
|
6,989
|
|
Personal non-credit card
|
|
|
530
|
|
|
|
998
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-accrual receivables
|
|
|
6,886
|
|
|
|
7,987
|
|
Nonaccrual receivables held for sale
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
Accruing credit card receivables 90 or more days
delinquent(3)
|
|
|
447
|
|
|
|
890
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total nonperforming receivables
|
|
$
|
7,337
|
|
|
$
|
8,883
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credit loss reserves as a percent of nonperforming
receivables-continuing
operations(4)
|
|
|
88.5
|
%
|
|
|
102.4
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
At December 31, 2010 and 2009,
non-accrual real estate secured receivables includes
$4.1 billion and $3.3 billion, respectively, of
receivables that are carried at the lower of cost or net
realizable value.
|
|
(2) |
|
Nonaccrual real estate secured
receivables, excluding receivables held for sale, are comprised
of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31,
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate secured:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Closed-end:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First lien
|
|
$
|
5,906
|
|
|
$
|
6,298
|
|
Second lien
|
|
|
320
|
|
|
|
510
|
|
Revolving:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First lien
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
Second lien
|
|
|
124
|
|
|
|
179
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total real estate secured
|
|
$
|
6,356
|
|
|
$
|
6,989
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3) |
|
Credit card receivables continue to
accrue interest after they become 90 or more days delinquent,
consistent with industry practice.
|
31
HSBC Finance Corporation
|
|
|
(4) |
|
Ratio represents credit loss
reserves divided by the corresponding outstanding balance of
total nonperforming receivables. Nonperforming receivables
include accruing loans contractually past due 90 days or
more, but excludes nonperforming receivables associated with
receivable portfolios which are considered held for sale as
these receivables are carried at the lower of cost or fair value
with no corresponding credit loss reserves.
|
Troubled Debt Restructurings The following
table presents information about our TDR Loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31,
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
|
TDR
Loans(1)(2):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate secured:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First lien
|
|
$
|
8,697
|
|
|
$
|
8,379
|
|
Second lien
|
|
|
647
|
|
|
|
747
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total real estate
secured(3)(4)
|
|
|
9,344
|
|
|
|
9,126
|
|
Credit card
|
|
|
427
|
|
|
|
461
|
|
Personal non-credit card
|
|
|
704
|
|
|
|
726
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total TDR Loans
|
|
$
|
10,475
|
|
|
$
|
10,313
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31,
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
|
Credit loss reserves for TDR Loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate secured:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First lien
|
|
$
|
1,728
|
|
|
$
|
1,766
|
|
Second lien
|
|
|
258
|
|
|
|
373
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total real estate secured
|
|
|
1,986
|
|
|
|
2,139
|
|
Credit card
|
|
|
154
|
|
|
|
158
|
|
Personal non-credit card
|
|
|
395
|
|
|
|
353
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total credit loss reserves for TDR
Loans(1)(5)
|
|
$
|
2,535
|
|
|
$
|
2,650
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
TDR Loans are considered to be
impaired loans regardless of accrual status. We use certain
assumptions and estimates to compile our TDR balances and future
cash flow estimates relating to these loans.
|
|
(2) |
|
The TDR Loan balances included in
the table above reflect the current carrying amount of TDR Loans
and includes all basis adjustments on the loan, such as unearned
income, unamortized deferred fees and costs on originated loans
and premiums or discounts on purchased loans. The following
table reflects the unpaid principal balance of TDR Loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31,
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
|
Real estate secured:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First lien
|
|
$
|
9,650
|
|
|
$
|
8,915
|
|
Second lien
|
|
|
709
|
|
|
|
767
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total real estate secured
|
|
|
10,359
|
|
|
|
9,682
|
|
Credit card
|
|
|
434
|
|
|
|
473
|
|
Personal non-credit card
|
|
|
705
|
|
|
|
726
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total TDR Loans
|
|
$
|
11,498
|
|
|
$
|
10,881
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3) |
|
At December 31, 2010 and 2009,
TDR Loans totaling $1.5 billion and $773 million,
respectively, are recorded at net realizable value less cost to
sell and, therefore, generally do not have credit loss reserves
associated with them.
|
32
HSBC Finance Corporation
|
|
|
(4) |
|
The following table summarizes real
estate secured TDR Loans for our Mortgage Services and Consumer
Lending businesses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31,
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
|
Mortgage Services
|
|
$
|
4,114
|
|
|
$
|
4,350
|
|
Consumer Lending
|
|
|
5,230
|
|
|
|
4,776
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total real estate secured
|
|
$
|
9,344
|
|
|
$
|
9,126
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5) |
|
Included in credit loss reserves.
|
Additional information relating to TDR Loans is presented in the
table below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
|
Average balance of TDR
Loans(1):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate secured
|
|
$
|
9,534
|
(2)
|
|
$
|
5,743
|
|
|
$
|
3,521
|
|
Credit card
|
|
|
467
|
|
|
|
287
|
|
|
|
398
|
|
Personal non-credit card
|
|
|
736
|
|
|
|
731
|
|
|
|
530
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total average balance of TDR Loans
|
|
$
|
10,737
|
|
|
$
|
6,761
|
|
|
$
|
4,449
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income recognized on TDR Loans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate secured:
|
|
$
|
446
|
(2)
|
|
$
|
323
|
|
|
$
|
266
|
|
Credit card
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
Personal non-credit card
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest income recognized on TDR Loans
|
|
$
|
543
|
|
|
$
|
399
|
|
|
$
|
332
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
As previously disclosed in our 2009
Form 10-K,
modified loans which otherwise qualified as a TDR have
historically continued to be reported as a TDR until such loans
left a qualifying modification status. This was the result of
our financial accounting systems not having the ability to track
and report modified real estate secured loans which previously
had been considered a TDR once they left a qualifying
modification status. During the second half of 2009, we
developed enhanced tracking capabilities which enabled us to
identify and report certain modified customer loans which had
qualified as a TDR, but did not remain in compliance with the
modified loan terms and were subsequently removed from
modification status. Additionally, during the fourth quarter of
2009 we also discovered that certain loans which should have
been identified and reported as TDRs prior to the fourth quarter
of 2009 were not being captured in our disclosure. The impact of
these system changes resulted in an increase in real estate
secured and personal non-credit card TDR Loans reported during
the second half of 2009 and impacts the comparability of the
average balance of TDR Loans between the periods reported above.
|
|
(2) |
|
The following summarizes the
average balance of real estate secured TDR Loans and interest
income recognized on real estate secured TDR Loans split between
first and second lien loans for the year ended December 31,
2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First
|
|
Second
|
|
Total Real
|
|
|
Lien
|
|
Lien
|
|
Estate Secured
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
Average balance of real estate secured TDR Loans
|
|
$
|
8,832
|
|
|
$
|
702
|
|
|
$
|
9,534
|
|
Interest income recognized on real estate secured TDR Loans
|
|
|
407
|
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
|
446
|
|
Consumer Receivable Credit Quality
Indicators Credit quality indicators used for
consumer receivables include a loans delinquency status,
whether the loan is performing and whether the loan is
considered a TDR Loan.
33
HSBC Finance Corporation
Delinquency The following table summarizes dollars of
two-months-and-over contractual delinquency and as a percent of
total receivables and receivables held for sale
(delinquency ratio) for our loan portfolio:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2010
|
|
|
December 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
Dollars of
|
|
|
Delinquency
|
|
|
Dollars of
|
|
|
Delinquency
|
|
|
|
Delinquency
|
|
|
Ratio
|
|
|
Delinquency
|
|
|
Ratio
|
|
|
|
|
|
(dollars are in millions)
|
|
|
Real estate secured:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First lien
|
|
$
|
7,504
|
|
|
|
17.11
|
%
|
|
$
|
8,372
|
|
|
|
16.10
|
%
|
Second lien
|
|
|
667
|
|
|
|
12.18
|
|
|
|
1,023
|
|
|
|
13.56
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total real estate secured
|
|
|
8,171
|
|
|
|
16.56
|
|
|
|
9,395
|
|
|
|
15.78
|
|
Credit card receivables
|
|
|
612
|
|
|
|
6.18
|
|
|
|
1,211
|
|
|
|
10.41
|
|
Personal non-credit card
|
|
|
779
|
|
|
|
10.94
|
|
|
|
1,432
|
|
|
|
13.65
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
9,562
|
|
|
|
14.41
|
%
|
|
$
|
12,038
|
|
|
|
14.74
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonperforming The status of our consumer
receivable portfolio are summarized in the following table:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accruing Loans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contractually Past
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Performing
|
|
|
Nonaccrual
|
|
|
Due 90 days or
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans
|
|
|
Loans
|
|
|
More(1)
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
|
At December 31, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate secured
|
|
$
|
42,976
|
|
|
$
|
6,360
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
49,336
|
|
Credit Cards
|
|
|
9,450
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
447
|
|
|
|
9,897
|
|
Personal non-credit card
|
|
|
6,587
|
|
|
|
530
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
7,117
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
59,013
|
|
|
$
|
6,890
|
|
|
$
|
447
|
|
|
$
|
66,350
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate secured
|
|
$
|
52,540
|
|
|
$
|
6,995
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
59,535
|
|
Credit Cards
|
|
|
10,736
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
890
|
|
|
|
11,626
|
|
Personal non-credit card
|
|
|
9,488
|
|
|
|
998
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
10,486
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
72,764
|
|
|
$
|
7,993
|
|
|
$
|
890
|
|
|
$
|
81,647
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Credit card receivables continue to
accrue interest after they become 90 days or more
delinquent, consistent with industry practice.
|
Troubled debt restructurings See discussion of TDR Loans
above for further details on this credit quality indicator.
|
|
8.
|
Changes
in Charge-off Policies During 2009
|
We have historically maintained charge-off policies within our
Consumer Lending and Mortgage Services businesses that were
developed in consideration of the historical consumer finance
customer profile. As such, these policies focused on maximizing
the amount of cash collected while avoiding excessive collection
expenses on loans which would likely become uncollectible. Our
historical real estate secured charge-off policies reflected
consideration of customer behavior in that initiation of
foreclosure or repossession activities often served to prompt
repayment of delinquent balances and, therefore, were designed
to avoid ultimate foreclosure or repossession whenever it was
economically reasonable. Charge-off policies for our personal
non-credit card receivables were designed to be responsive to
customer needs and collection experience which justified a
longer collection and work out period for the consumer finance
customer. Therefore, the charge-off policies for these products
were historically longer than bank competitors who served a
different market.
34
HSBC Finance Corporation
The impact of the economic turmoil which began in 2007 resulted
in a change to the customer behavior patterns described above
and it became clear in 2009 that the historical behavior
patterns will not be re-established for the foreseeable future,
if at all. As a result of these changes in customer behavior and
resultant payment patterns, in December 2009 we elected to adopt
more bank-like charge-off policies for our real estate secured
and personal non-credit card receivables. As a result, real
estate secured receivables are now written down to net
realizable value less cost to sell generally no later than the
end of the month in which the account becomes 180 days
contractually delinquent. For personal non-credit card
receivables, charge-off now occurs generally no later than the
end of the month in which the account becomes 180 days
contractually delinquent.
The impact of the changes in our charge-off policies adopted
during the fourth quarter of 2009 resulted in an increase to our
net loss of $227 million as summarized below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Personal
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real Estate
|
|
|
Non-Credit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Secured
|
|
|
Card
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
|
Net interest income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reversal of accrued interest income on charged-off
accounts(1)
|
|
$
|
246
|
|
|
$
|
105
|
|
|
$
|
351
|
|
Provision for credit losses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Charge-offs to comply with charge-off policy changes
|
|
|
2,402
|
|
|
|
1,071
|
|
|
|
3,473
|
|
Release of credit loss reserves associated with principal and
accrued interest income
|
|
|
(2,594
|
)
|
|
|
(878
|
)
|
|
|
(3,472
|
)
|
Tax benefit
|
|
|
(19
|
)
|
|
|
(106
|
)
|
|
|
(125
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reductions to net income
|
|
$
|
35
|
|
|
$
|
192
|
|
|
$
|
227
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Accrued interest income is reversed
against finance and other interest income.
|
An analysis of credit loss reserves for continuing operations
was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
|
Credit loss reserves at beginning of period
|
|
$
|
9,091
|
|
|
$
|
12,030
|
|
|
$
|
10,127
|
|
Provision for credit losses
|
|
|
6,180
|
|
|
|
9,650
|
|
|
|
12,410
|
(1)
|
Charge-offs
|
|
|
(9,500
|
)
|
|
|
(13,087
|
)(2)
|
|
|
(9,975
|
)
|
Recoveries
|
|
|
720
|
|
|
|
498
|
|
|
|
646
|
|
Reserves on receivables transferred to held for sale
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(1,168
|
)
|
Other, net
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credit loss reserves at end of period
|
|
$
|
6,491
|
|
|
$
|
9,091
|
|
|
$
|
12,030
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes $191 million in 2008
related to the lower of cost or fair value adjustment
attributable to credit for receivables transferred to held for
sale. See Note 10, Receivables Held for Sale,
for further discussion.
|
|
(2) |
|
Includes $3.5 billion related
to the changes in charge-off polices for real estate secured and
personal non-credit card receivables in December 2009. See
Note 8, Changes to Charge-off Policies During
2009, for additional information.
|
35
HSBC Finance Corporation
The following table summarizes the changes in credit loss
reserves by product/class and the related receivable balance by
product during the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and
2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real Estate Secured
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First
|
|
|
Second
|
|
|
Credit
|
|
|
Private
|
|
|
Personal Non-
|
|
|
Comml
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lien
|
|
|
Lien
|
|
|
Card
|
|
|
Label
|
|
|
Credit Card
|
|
|
and Other
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credit loss reserve balances at beginning of period
|
|
$
|
3,997
|
|
|
$
|
1,430
|
|
|
$
|
1,816
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
1,848
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
9,091
|
|
Provision for credit losses
|
|
|
3,126
|
|
|
|
789
|
|
|
|
834
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1,431
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
6,180
|
|
Charge-offs
|
|
|
(3,811
|
)
|
|
|
(1,456
|
)
|
|
|
(1,905
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(2,328
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(9,500
|
)
|
Recoveries
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
|
69
|
|
|
|
233
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
375
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
720
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net charge-offs
|
|
|
(3,768
|
)
|
|
|
(1,387
|
)
|
|
|
(1,672
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(1,953
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(8,780
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credit loss reserve balance at end of period
|
|
$
|
3,355
|
|
|
$
|
832
|
|
|
$
|
978
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
1,326
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
6,491
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance: collectively evaluated for impairment
|
|
$
|
1,611
|
|
|
$
|
571
|
|
|
$
|
824
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
931
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
3,937
|
|
Ending balance: individually evaluated for
impairment(3)
|
|
|
1,728
|
|
|
|
258
|
|
|
|
154
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
395
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
2,535
|
|
Ending balance: loans acquired with deteriorated credit quality
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total credit loss reserves
|
|
$
|
3,355
|
|
|
$
|
832
|
|
|
$
|
978
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
1,326
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
6,491
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Receivables:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Collectively evaluated for impairment
|
|
$
|
31,556
|
|
|
$
|
4,762
|
|
|
$
|
9,470
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
6,413
|
|
|
$
|
33
|
|
|
$
|
52,234
|
|
Individually evaluated for
impairment(3)
|
|
|
7,240
|
|
|
|
635
|
|
|
|
427
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
704
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
9,006
|
|
Receivables carried at net realizable value
|
|
|
5,022
|
|
|
|
73
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
5,095
|
|
Receivables acquired with deteriorated credit quality
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total receivables
|
|
$
|
43,859
|
|
|
$
|
5,477
|
|
|
$
|
9,897
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
7,117
|
|
|
$
|
33
|
|
|
$
|
66,383
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credit loss reserve balances at beginning of period
|
|
$
|
4,998
|
|
|
$
|
2,115
|
|
|
$
|
2,249
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
2,668
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
12,030
|
|
Provision for credit losses
|
|
|
3,354
|
|
|
|
1,558
|
|
|
|
1,746
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
2,992
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
9,650
|
|
Charge-offs(1)
|
|
|
(4,381
|
)
|
|
|
(2,282
|
)
|
|
|
(2,385
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(4,039
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(13,087
|
)
|
Recoveries
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
|
206
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
227
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
498
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net charge-offs
|
|
|
(4,355
|
)
|
|
|
(2,243
|
)
|
|
|
(2,179
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(3,812
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(12,589
|
)
|
Receivables transferred to held for sale
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credit loss reserve balance at end of period
|
|
$
|
3,997
|
|
|
$
|
1,430
|
|
|
$
|
1,816
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
1,848
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
9,091
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance: collectively evaluated for impairment
|
|
$
|
2,206
|
|
|
$
|
1,051
|
|
|
$
|
1,658
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
1,495
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
6,410
|
|
Ending balance: individually evaluated for
impairment(3)
|
|
|
1,766
|
|
|
|
373
|
|
|
|
158
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
353
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
2,650
|
|
Ending balance: loans acquired with deteriorated credit quality
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total credit loss reserves
|
|
$
|
3,997
|
|
|
$
|
1,430
|
|
|
$
|
1,816
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
1,848
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
9,091
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36
HSBC Finance Corporation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real Estate Secured
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First
|
|
|
Second
|
|
|
Credit
|
|
|
Private
|
|
|
Personal Non-
|
|
|
Comml
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lien
|
|
|
Lien
|
|
|
Card
|
|
|
Label
|
|
|
Credit Card
|
|
|
and Other
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
Receivables:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Collectively evaluated for impairment
|
|
$
|
40,972
|
|
|
$
|
6,753
|
|
|
$
|
11,165
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
9,760
|
|
|
$
|
50
|
|
|
$
|
68,700
|
|
Individually evaluated for
impairment(3)
|
|
|
7,613
|
|
|
|
741
|
|
|
|
461
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
726
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
9,541
|
|
Receivables carried at net realizable value
|
|
|
3,374
|
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
3,420
|
|
Receivables acquired with deteriorated credit quality
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total receivables
|
|
$
|
51,988
|
|
|
$
|
7,547
|
|
|
$
|
11,626
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
10,486
|
|
|
$
|
50
|
|
|
$
|
81,697
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of period
|
|
$
|
2,350
|
|
|
$
|
2,604
|
|
|
$
|
2,635
|
|
|
$
|
26
|
|
|
$
|
2,511
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
10,127
|
|
Provision for credit losses
|
|
|
4,684
|
|
|
|
1,978
|
|
|
|
3,333
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
2,396
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
12,410
|
|
Charge-offs
|
|
|
(1,956
|
)
|
|
|
(2,362
|
)
|
|
|
(3,147
|
)
|
|
|
(35
|
)
|
|
|
(2,474
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(9,975
|
)
|
Recoveries
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
|
369
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
222
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
646
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net charge-offs
|
|
|
(1,946
|
)
|
|
|
(2,323
|
)
|
|
|
(2,778
|
)
|
|
|
(29
|
)
|
|
|
(2,252
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(9,329
|
)
|
Receivables transferred to held for sale
|
|
|
(80
|
)
|
|
|
(144
|
)
|
|
|
(944
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(1,168
|
)
|
Release of credit loss reserves related to loan sales
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of period
|
|
$
|
4,998
|
|
|
$
|
2,115
|
|
|
$
|
2,246
|
|
|
$
|
16
|
(2)
|
|
$
|
2,655
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
12,030
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes $2.0 billion for
first lien real estate secured receivables, $434 million
for second lien real estate secured receivables and
$1.1 billion for personal non-credit card receivables
related to the December 2009 Charge-off Policy Changes.
|
|
(2) |
|
In the first quarter of 2009, we
began reporting our liquidating private label receivable
portfolio, which consists primarily of the liquidating retail
sales contracts in our Consumer Lending business prospectively
within our personal non-credit card receivable portfolio.
Accordingly, beginning in the first quarter of 2009, we have
also begun reporting the associated credit loss reserves for
these receivables with the appropriate receivable product,
primarily personal non-credit card receivables.
|
|
(3) |
|
These amounts represent TDR Loans
for which we evaluate reserves using a discounted cash flow
methodology. Each loan is individually identified as a TDR Loan
and then grouped together with other TDR Loans with similar
characteristics. The discounted cash flow impairment analysis is
then applied to these groups of TDR Loans.
|
Credit loss reserves at December 31, 2009 were
significantly impacted by changes in our charge-off policies for
real estate secured, personal non-credit card and auto finance
receivables. See Note 8, Changes in Charge-off
Policies During 2009, for further discussion.
|
|
10.
|
Receivables
Held for Sale
|
Receivables held for sale, which are carried at the lower of
cost or fair value, consisted of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
|
Real estate secured receivables held for
sale(1)
|
|
$
|
4
|
|
|
$
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
These receivables were originated
with the intent to sell.
|
37
HSBC Finance Corporation
The following table shows the activity in receivables held for
sale during 2010 and 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
|
Receivables held for sale at beginning of period
|
|
$
|
3
|
|
|
$
|
13,894
|
|
Receivable sales
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(12,112
|
)
|
Additional lower of cost or fair value adjustment subsequent to
transfer to receivables held for sale
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
(374
|
)
|
Transfer into receivables held for investment at the lower of
cost or fair value:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate secured
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(216
|
)
|
Credit card
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(1,078
|
)
|
Net change in receivable balance
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(111
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Receivables held for sale at end of period
|
|
$
|
4
|
|
|
$
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In January 2009, we sold our GM and UP Portfolios to HSBC Bank
USA. See Note 4, Receivable Portfolio Sales to HSBC
Bank USA, and Note 23, Related Party
Transactions, for details of these transactions.
In March and September 2009, we transferred real estate secured
receivables previously classified as receivables held for sale
to receivables held for investment as we now intend to hold
these receivables for the foreseeable future, generally twelve
months for real estate secured receivables. These receivables
were transferred at their current fair market value of
$216 million.
In June and December 2009, we transferred credit card
receivables previously classified as receivables held for sale
to receivables held for investment as we now intend to hold
these receivables for the foreseeable future. These receivables
were transferred at their current fair market value of
$1.1 billion.
The following table summarizes the components of the lower of
cost or fair value adjustments recorded at the date of transfer
to receivables held for sale during 2010, 2009 and 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
|
Provision for credit
losses(1)
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
191
|
|
Lower of cost or fair value adjustment recorded as a component
of other
income(2)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
200
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total lower of cost or fair value adjustment
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
391
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The portion of the lower of cost or
fair value adjustment attributable to credit was recorded as a
provision for credit losses. This was determined by giving
consideration to the impact of
over-the-life
credit loss estimates as compared to the existing credit loss
reserves prior to our decision to transfer to receivables held
for sale.
|
|
(2) |
|
Reflects the impact on value caused
by current marketplace conditions including changes in interest
rates and illiquidity.
|
The valuation allowance on receivables held for sale was
$3 million and $7 million at December 31, 2010
and 2009, respectively.
As it relates to our discontinued auto finance operations, in
June and September 2009, we transferred auto finance receivables
with a combined fair value of $533 million to receivables
held for sale and recorded a lower of cost or fair value
adjustment of $44 million during 2009 attributable to
credit and marketplace conditions and is included as a component
loss from discontinued operations. These receivables were sold
to SC USA during March 2010. Additionally, in July 2010, we
transferred auto finance receivables to held for sale with an
outstanding principal balance of $2.9 billion at the time
of transfer and recorded a lower of cost or fair value
adjustment of $87 million attributable to credit which was
included as a component of loss from discontinued operations.
These receivables were sold to SC USA in August 2010. See
Note 3, Discontinued Operations, for additional
information on these transactions.
38
HSBC Finance Corporation
|
|
11.
|
Properties
and Equipment
|
Property and Equipment consisted of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciable
|
At December 31,
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Life
|
|
|
|
(dollars are in millions)
|
|
Land
|
|
$
|
13
|
|
|
$
|
13
|
|
|
-
|
Buildings and improvements
|
|
|
257
|
|
|
|
233
|
|
|
10-40 years
|
Furniture and equipment
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
3-10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
313
|
|
|
|
293
|
|
|
|
Accumulated depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
(111
|
)
|
|
|
(92
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Properties and equipment, net
|
|
$
|
202
|
|
|
$
|
201
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization expense for continuing operations
totaled $29 million, $38 million and $56 million
in 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
Intangible assets consisted of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cumulative
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impairment
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
At December 31, 2010
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
Charges
|
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
|
Purchased credit card relationships and related
programs(1)
|
|
$
|
1,736
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
1,131
|
|
|
$
|
605
|
|
Consumer loan related relationships
|
|
|
333
|
|
|
|
163
|
|
|
|
170
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Technology, customer lists and other contracts
|
|
|
261
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
252
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
2,330
|
|
|
$
|
172
|
|
|
$
|
1,553
|
|
|
$
|
605
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cumulative
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impairment
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
December 31, 2009
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
Charges
|
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
|
Purchased credit card relationships and related
programs(1)
|
|
$
|
1,736
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
992
|
|
|
$
|
744
|
|
Consumer loan related relationships
|
|
|
333
|
|
|
|
163
|
|
|
|
170
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Technology, customer lists and other contracts
|
|
|
261
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
248
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
2,330
|
|
|
$
|
172
|
|
|
$
|
1,410
|
|
|
$
|
748
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Purchased credit card relationships
are being amortized to their estimated residual value of
$162 million at December 31, 2010 and 2009.
|
During the third quarter of 2010, we completed our annual
impairment testing of intangible assets. As a result of this
testing, we determined that the fair value of each remaining
intangible asset exceeded its carrying value. Therefore, we
concluded that none of our intangible assets were impaired.
The weighted-average amortization period for our purchased
credit card relationships and related programs as of
December 31, 2010 was 106 months.
39
HSBC Finance Corporation
Intangible amortization expense totaled totaled
$143 million, $157 million and $178 million in
2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively. Estimated amortization
expense associated with our intangible assets for each of the
following years is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ending December 31,
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
|
2011
|
|
$
|
138
|
|
2012
|
|
|
135
|
|
2013
|
|
|
99
|
|
2014
|
|
|
71
|
|
Changes in the carrying amount of goodwill for continuing
operations are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of year
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
2,294
|
|
Goodwill impairment related to the Insurance Services business
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(260
|
)
|
Goodwill impairment related to the Card and Retail Services
business
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(2,034
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of year
|
|
$
|
-
|
(1)
|
|
$
|
-
|
(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
At December 31, 2010 and 2009,
accumulated impairment losses on goodwill totaled
$6.0 billion.
|
As a result of the continuing deterioration of economic
conditions throughout 2008 and into 2009 as well as the adverse
impact to our Insurance Services business which resulted from
the closure of all of our Consumer Lending branches, we wrote
off all of our remaining goodwill balance during the first half
of 2009.
40
HSBC Finance Corporation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial
|
|
|
Paper
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
December 31, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
Balance
|
|
$
|
3,156
|
|
Highest aggregate month-end balance
|
|
|
4,864
|
|
Average borrowings
|
|
|
3,732
|
|
Weighted-average interest rate:
|
|
|
|
|
At year-end
|
|
|
.3
|
%
|
Paid during year
|
|
|
.3
|
|
December 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
Balance
|
|
$
|
4,291
|
|
Highest aggregate month-end balance
|
|
|
6,973
|
|
Average borrowings
|
|
|
5,412
|
|
Weighted-average interest rate:
|
|
|
|
|
At year-end
|
|
|
.4
|
%
|
Paid during year
|
|
|
.9
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
Balance
|
|
$
|
9,639
|
|
Highest aggregate month-end balance
|
|
|
11,901
|
|
Average borrowings
|
|
|
7,853
|
|
Weighted-average interest rate:
|
|
|
|
|
At year-end
|
|
|
1.0
|
%
|
Paid during year
|
|
|
2.6
|
|
Interest expense for commercial paper totaled $11 million
in 2010, $49 million in 2009 and $207 million in 2008.
We maintain various bank credit agreements primarily to support
commercial paper borrowings. We had committed
back-up
lines of credit totaling $6.3 billion and $7.8 billion
at December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. At
December 31, 2009, one of these facilities totaling
$2.5 billion was with an HSBC affiliate to support our
issuance of commercial paper. This $2.5 billion credit
facility was renewed in September 2010 as a new
$2.0 billion
back-up
credit facility, split evenly between 364 day and two year
tenors. Credit lines expire at various dates through 2012.
Borrowings under these lines generally are available at a spread
over LIBOR.
Our third party
back-up line
agreements contain a financial covenant which requires us to
maintain a minimum tangible common equity to tangible assets
ratio of 6.75 percent. Additionally, we are required to
maintain a minimum of $6.0 billion of debt extended to us
from affiliates through June 30, 2011 and $5.0 billion
thereafter. At December 31, 2010, we were in compliance
with all applicable financial covenants.
Annual commitment fee expenses to support availability of these
lines during 2010, 2009 and 2008 totaled $33 million,
$18 million and $8 million, respectively, and included
$16 million, $9 million and $2 million,
respectively, for the HSBC lines.
41
HSBC Finance Corporation
Long-term debt consisted of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31,
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
|
Senior debt:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed rate:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Secured financings:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.00% to 5.99%; due 2019 to 2021
|
|
|
373
|
|
|
|
488
|
|
Other fixed rate senior debt:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.00% to 1.99%; due 2013
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
2.00% to 2.99%; due 2010 to 2032
|
|
|
697
|
|
|
|
1,269
|
|
3.00% to 3.99%; due 2010 to 2015
|
|
|
440
|
|
|
|
152
|
|
4.00% to 4.99%; due 2010 to 2023
|
|
|
4,069
|
|
|
|
6,442
|
|
5.00% to 5.49%; due 2010 to 2021
|
|
|
11,613
|
|
|
|
13,226
|
|
5.50% to 5.99%; due 2010 to 2020
|
|
|
6,281
|
|
|
|
8,972
|
|
6.00% to 6.49%; due 2010 to 2033
|
|
|
6,165
|
|
|
|
7,261
|
|
6.50% to 6.99%; due 2010 to 2033
|
|
|
2,111
|
|
|
|
2,162
|
|
7.00% to 7.49%; due 2011 to 2032
|
|
|
1,864
|
|
|
|
2,109
|
|
7.50% to 7.99%; due 2012 to 2032
|
|
|
1,075
|
|
|
|
1,646
|
|
8.00% to 9.00%; due 2010
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1,178
|
|
Variable interest rate:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Secured financings .32% to 2.76%; due 2010 to 2023
|
|
|
3,704
|
|
|
|
4,190
|
|
Other variable interest rate senior debt .33% to
5.89%; due 2010 to 2016
|
|
|
13,004
|
|
|
|
18,719
|
|
Subordinated debt
|
|
|
2,208
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Junior subordinated notes issued to capital trusts
|
|
|
1,031
|
|
|
|
1,031
|
|
Unamortized discount
|
|
|
(89
|
)
|
|
|
(99
|
)
|
Obligation under capital lease
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
HSBC acquisition purchase accounting fair value
adjustments
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
116
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total long-term debt
|
|
$
|
54,616
|
|
|
$
|
68,880
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
HSBC acquisition purchase accounting fair value adjustments
represent adjustments which have been pushed down to
record our long-term debt at fair value at the date of our
acquisition by HSBC.
At December 31, 2010, long-term debt included carrying
value adjustments relating to derivative financial instruments
which increased the debt balance by $34 million and a
foreign currency translation adjustment relating to our foreign
denominated debt which increased the debt balance by
$2.1 billion. At December 31, 2009, long-term debt
included carrying value adjustments relating to derivative
financial instruments which increased the debt balance by
$55 million and a foreign currency translation adjustment
relating to our foreign denominated debt which increased the
debt balance by $2.3 billion.
At December 31, 2010 and 2009, we have elected fair value
option accounting for certain of our fixed rate debt issuances.
See Note 16, Fair Value Option, for further
details. At December 31, 2010 and 2009, long-term debt
totaling $20.8 billion and $26.7 billion,
respectively, was carried at fair value.
Weighted-average interest rates on long-term debt were
4.6 percent and 4.1 percent at December 31, 2010
and 2009, respectively (excluding HSBC acquisition purchase
accounting adjustments). Interest expense for long-term debt was
$2.9 billion in 2010, $3.5 billion in 2009 and
$5.0 billion in 2008. There are no restrictive financial
covenants in any of our long-term debt agreements. Debt
denominated in a foreign currency is included in the applicable
rate category based on the effective U.S. dollar equivalent
rate as summarized in Note 17, Derivative Financial
Instruments.
During the fourth quarter of 2010, we offered noteholders of
certain series of our debt the ability to exchange their
existing senior notes for newly issued subordinated debt. As a
result, we issued $1.9 billion in new
10-year
fixed rate
42
HSBC Finance Corporation
subordinated debt in exchange for tendered debt totaling
$1.8 billion. Of the newly issued subordinated debt,
$1.2 billion was recorded in long-term debt and
$731 million was recorded in due to affiliates. In December
2010, we issued an additional $1.0 billion of
10-year
fixed rate subordinated debt to institutional investors.
During 2010, we redeemed $1.0 billion of retail medium-term
notes in four phases of approximately $250 million each.
These redemptions were funded through a new $1.0 billion
364-day
uncommitted revolving credit agreement with HSBC North America
which was also executed during the third quarter of 2010 and
allowed for borrowings with maturities of up to 15 years.
During 2010, we borrowed $1.0 billion under this credit
agreement with scheduled maturities between 2022 and 2025. In
November 2010, we replaced the $1.0 billion outstanding
under this loan through the issuance of preferred stock to HSBC
Investments (North America) Inc. (HINO). See
Note 19, Redeemable Preferred Stock, for
additional information regarding this issuance of preferred
stock.
Receivables we have sold in collateralized funding transactions
structured as secured financings remain on our balance sheet.
The entities used in these transactions are VIEs and we are
deemed to be their primary beneficiary because we hold
beneficial interests that expose us to the majority of their
expected losses. Accordingly, we consolidate these entities and
report the debt securities issued by them as secured financings
in long-term debt. Secured financings previously issued under
public trusts of $3.9 billion at December 31, 2010 are
secured by $5.9 billion of closed-end real estate secured
receivables, which are reported as receivables in the
consolidated balance sheet. Secured financings previously issued
under public trusts of $4.7 billion at December 31,
2009 are secured by $6.8 billion of closed-end real estate
secured receivables. The holders of debt instruments issued by
consolidated VIEs have recourse only to the receivables securing
those instruments and have no recourse to our general credit.
The following table summarizes our junior subordinated notes
issued to capital trusts (Junior Subordinated Notes)
and the related company obligated mandatorily redeemable
preferred securities (Preferred Securities):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
HSBC Finance Capital
|
|
|
Trust IX
|
|
|
(HFCT IX)
|
|
|
|
(dollars are
|
|
|
in millions)
|
|
Junior Subordinated Notes:
|
|
|
|
|
Principal balance
|
|
$
|
1,031
|
|
Interest rate
|
|
|
5.91
|
%
|
Redeemable by issuer
|
|
|
November 2015
|
|
Stated maturity
|
|
|
November 2035
|
|
Preferred Securities:
|
|
|
|
|
Rate
|
|
|
5.91
|
%
|
Face value
|
|
$
|
1,000
|
|
Issue date
|
|
|
November 2005
|
|
The Preferred Securities must be redeemed when the Junior
Subordinated Notes are paid. The Junior Subordinated Notes have
a stated maturity date, but are redeemable by us, in whole or in
part, beginning on the dates indicated above at which time the
Preferred Securities are callable at par ($25 per Preferred
Security) plus accrued and unpaid dividends. Dividends on the
Preferred Securities are cumulative, payable quarterly in
arrears, and are deferrable at our option for up to five years.
We cannot pay dividends on our preferred and common stocks
during such deferments. The Preferred Securities have a
liquidation value of $25 per preferred security. Our obligations
with respect to the Junior Subordinated Notes, when considered
together with certain undertakings of HSBC Finance Corporation
with respect to HFCT IX, constitute full and unconditional
guarantees by us of HFCT IXs obligations under the
Preferred Securities.
43
HSBC Finance Corporation
Maturities of long-term debt at December 31, 2010,
including secured financings, conduit facility renewals and
capital lease obligations were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
|
|
|
2011(1)
|
|
$
|
12,904
|
|
2012
|
|
|
11,373
|
|
2013
|
|
|
6,981
|
|
2014
|
|
|
2,931
|
|
2015
|
|
|
5,291
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
15,136
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
54,616
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Weighted average interest rate on
long-term debt maturing in 2011 is 5.1%.
|
Certain components of our long-term debt may be redeemed prior
to its stated maturity.
We have elected FVO reporting for certain of our fixed rate debt
issuances. At December 31, 2010, fixed rate debt accounted
for under FVO totaled $21.3 billion, of which
$20.8 billion is included as a component of long-term debt
and $436 million is included as a component of due to
affiliates. At December 31, 2010, we had not elected FVO
for $16.8 billion of fixed rate long-term debt carried on
our balance sheet. Fixed rate debt accounted for under FVO at
December 31, 2010 has an aggregate unpaid principal balance
of $20.4 billion which included a foreign currency
translation adjustment relating to our foreign denominated FVO
debt which increased the debt balance by $404 million.
Long-term debt at December 31, 2009 includes
$26.7 billion of fixed rate debt accounted for under FVO.
At December 31, 2009, we did not elect FVO for
$18.2 billion of fixed rate long-term debt currently
carried on our balance sheet. Fixed rate debt accounted for
under FVO at December 31, 2009 had an aggregate unpaid
principal balance of $25.9 billion which includes a foreign
currency translation adjustment relating to our foreign
denominated FVO debt which increased the debt balance by
$488 million.
We determine the fair value of the fixed rate debt accounted for
under FVO through the use of a third party pricing service. Such
fair value represents the full market price (credit and interest
rate impact) based on observable market data for the same or
similar debt instruments. See Note 26, Fair Value
Measurements, for a description of the methods and
significant assumptions used to estimate the fair value of our
fixed rate debt accounted for under FVO.
The components of gain (loss) on debt designated at fair value
and related derivatives are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
|
Mark-to-market
on debt designated at fair
value(1):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate component
|
|
$
|
(269
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,063
|
|
|
$
|
(1,957
|
)
|
Credit risk component
|
|
|
109
|
|
|
|
(3,334
|
)
|
|
|
3,106
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
mark-to-market
on debt designated at fair value
|
|
|
(160
|
)
|
|
|
(2,271
|
)
|
|
|
1,149
|
|
Mark-to-market
on the related
derivatives(1)
|
|
|
112
|
|
|
|
(609
|
)
|
|
|
1,775
|
|
Net realized gains on the related derivatives
|
|
|
789
|
|
|
|
755
|
|
|
|
236
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain (loss) on debt designated at fair value and related
derivatives
|
|
$
|
741
|
|
|
$
|
(2,125
|
)
|
|
$
|
3,160
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Mark-to-market
on debt designated at fair value and related derivatives
excludes market value changes due to fluctuations in foreign
currency exchange rates. Foreign currency translation gains
(losses) recorded in derivative related income associated with
debt designated at fair value was a gain of $84 million
during 2010 compared to a loss of $75 million during 2009.
Offsetting gains (losses) recorded in derivative related income
associated with the related derivatives was a loss of
$84 million during 2010 compared to a gain of
$75 million during 2009.
|
44
HSBC Finance Corporation
The movement in the fair value reflected in gain (loss) on debt
designated at fair value and related derivatives includes the
effect of credit spread changes and interest rate changes,
including any economic ineffectiveness in the relationship
between the related swaps and our debt and any realized gains or
losses on those swaps. With respect to the credit component, as
credit spreads widen accounting gains are booked and the reverse
is true if credit spreads narrow. Differences arise between the
movement in the fair value of our debt and the fair value of the
related swap due to the different credit characteristics and
differences in the calculation of fair value for debt and
derivatives. The size and direction of the accounting
consequences of such changes can be volatile from period to
period but do not alter the cash flows intended as part of the
documented interest rate management strategy. On a cumulative
basis, we have recorded fair value option adjustments which
increased the value of our debt by $873 million and
$842 million at December 31, 2010 and 2009,
respectively.
The change in the fair value of the debt and the change in value
of the related derivatives reflects the following:
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate curve Interest rates in the
U.S. decreased during 2010 resulting in a loss in the
interest rate component on the
mark-to-market
of the debt and a gain on the
mark-to-market
of the related derivative. An increase in long-term
U.S. interest rates during 2009 resulted in gains in the
interest rate component on the
mark-to-market
of the debt and losses on the
mark-to-market
of the related derivative. Changes in the value of the interest
rate component of the debt as compared to the related derivative
are also affected by differences in cash flows and valuation
methodologies for the debt and the derivatives. Cash flows on
debt are discounted using a single discount rate from the bond
yield curve for each bonds applicable maturity while
derivative cash flows are discounted using rates at multiple
points and multiple rates along an interest rate curve. The
impacts of these differences vary as short-term and long-term
interest rates shift and time passes. Furthermore, certain
derivatives have been called by the counterparty resulting in
certain FVO debt having no related derivatives. As a result,
approximately 7 percent of our FVO debt does not have a
corresponding derivative at both December 31, 2010 and
2009, respectively. Income from net realized gains increased
during 2010 due to reduced short-term U.S. interest rates.
|
|
|
|
Credit During 2010 we experienced an overall
gain in the credit component of our debt primarily resulting
from widening of credit spreads in our longer-dated debt, which
was partially offset by the tightening of credit spreads in our
shorter-dated debt. During 2009, our credit spreads tightened
due to increased market confidence and improvements in
marketplace liquidity resulting in a loss in the credit
component of debt recorded at fair value.
|
Net income volatility, whether based on changes in the interest
rate or credit risk components of the
mark-to-market
on debt designated at fair value and the related derivatives,
impacts the comparability of our reported results between
periods. Accordingly, gain (loss) on debt designated at fair
value and related derivatives for 2010 should not be considered
indicative of the results for any future periods.
|
|
17.
|
Derivative
Financial Instruments
|
Our business activities involve analysis, evaluation, acceptance
and management of some degree of risk or combination of risks.
Accordingly, we have comprehensive risk management policies to
address potential financial risks, which include credit risk,
liquidity risk, market risk, and operational risks. Our risk
management policy is designed to identify and analyze these
risks, to set appropriate limits and controls, and to monitor
the risks and limits continually by means of reliable and
up-to-date
administrative and information systems. Our risk management
policies are primarily carried out in accordance with practice
and limits set by the HSBC Group Management Board. The HSBC
Finance Corporation Asset Liability Committee (ALCO)
meets regularly to review risks and approve appropriate risk
management strategies within the limits established by the HSBC
Group Management Board. Additionally, our Audit and Risk
Committee receives regular reports on our interest rate and
liquidity risk positions in relation to the established limits.
In accordance with the policies and strategies established by
ALCO, in the normal course of business, we enter into various
transactions involving derivative financial instruments. These
derivative financial instruments primarily are used as economic
hedges to manage risk.
45
HSBC Finance Corporation
Objectives for Holding Derivative Financial
Instruments Market risk (which includes interest
rate and foreign currency exchange risks) is the possibility
that a change in interest rates or foreign exchange rates will
cause a financial instrument to decrease in value or become more
costly to settle. Prior to our ceasing originations in our
Consumer Lending business and ceasing purchase activities in our
Mortgage Services business, customer demand for our loan
products shifted between fixed rate and floating rate products,
based on market conditions and preferences. These shifts in loan
products resulted in different funding strategies and produced
different interest rate risk exposures. Additionally, the mix of
receivables on our balance sheet and the corresponding market
risk is changing as we manage the liquidation of several of our
receivable portfolios. We maintain an overall risk management
strategy that utilizes interest rate and currency derivative
financial instruments to mitigate our exposure to fluctuations
caused by changes in interest rates and currency exchange rates
related to our debt liabilities. We manage our exposure to
interest rate risk primarily through the use of interest rate
swaps with the main objective of better matching the duration of
our liabilities to the duration of our assets. We manage our
exposure to foreign currency exchange risk primarily through the
use of cross currency interest rate swaps. We do not use
leveraged derivative financial instruments.
Interest rate swaps are contractual agreements between two
counterparties for the exchange of periodic interest payments
generally based on a notional principal amount and
agreed-upon
fixed or floating rates. The majority of our interest rate swaps
are used to manage our exposure to changes in interest rates by
converting floating rate debt to fixed rate or by converting
fixed rate debt to floating rate. We have also entered into
currency swaps to convert both principal and interest payments
on debt issued from one currency to the appropriate functional
currency.
We do not manage credit risk or the changes in fair value due to
the changes in credit risk by entering into derivative financial
instruments such as credit derivatives or credit default swaps.
Control Over Valuation Process and
Procedures A control framework has been established
which is designed to ensure that fair values are either
determined or validated by a function independent of the
risk-taker. To that end, the ultimate responsibility for the
determination of fair values rests with the HSBC Finance
Valuation Committee. The HSBC Finance Valuation Committee
establishes policies and procedures to ensure appropriate
valuations. Fair values for derivatives are determined by
management using valuation techniques, valuation models and
inputs that are developed, reviewed, validated and approved by
the Quantitative Risk and Valuation Group of an affiliate, HSBC
Bank USA. These valuation models utilize discounted cash flows
or an option pricing model adjusted for counterparty credit risk
and market liquidity. The models used apply appropriate control
processes and procedures to ensure that the derived inputs are
used to value only those instruments that share similar risk to
the relevant benchmark indexes and therefore demonstrate a
similar response to market factors. In addition, a validation
process is followed which includes participation in peer group
consensus pricing surveys, to ensure that valuation inputs
incorporate market participants risk expectations and risk
premium.
Credit Risk By utilizing derivative financial
instruments, we are exposed to counterparty credit risk.
Counterparty credit risk is our primary exposure on our interest
rate swap portfolio. Counterparty credit risk is the risk that
the counterparty to a transaction fails to perform according to
the terms of the contract. We manage the counterparty credit (or
repayment) risk in derivative instruments through established
credit approvals, risk control limits, collateral, and ongoing
monitoring procedures. We utilize an affiliate, HSBC Bank USA,
as the primary provider of domestic derivative products. We have
never suffered a loss due to counterparty failure.
At December 31, 2010 and 2009, substantially all of our
existing derivative contracts are with HSBC subsidiaries, making
them our primary counterparty in derivative transactions. Most
swap agreements require that payments be made to, or received
from, the counterparty when the fair value of the agreement
reaches a certain level. Generally, third-party swap
counterparties provide collateral in the form of cash which is
recorded in our balance sheet as derivative related liabilities.
At December 31, 2010 and 2009, we provided third party swap
counterparties with $33 million and $46 million of
collateral, respectively, in the form of cash. When the fair
value of our agreements with affiliate counterparties requires
the posting of collateral, it is provided in either the form of
cash and recorded on the balance sheet, consistent with third
party arrangements, or in the form of securities which are not
recorded on our balance sheet. At December 31, 2010 and
2009, the fair value of our agreements with affiliate
counterparties required the affiliate to provide collateral of
$2.5 billion and $3.4 billion, respectively, all of
which was provided in
46
HSBC Finance Corporation
cash. These amounts are offset against the fair value amount
recognized for derivative instruments that have been offset
under the same master netting arrangement and recorded in our
balance sheet as a component of derivative financial asset or
derivative related liabilities. At December 31, 2010, we
had derivative contracts with a notional value of
$50.5 billion, including $49.9 billion outstanding
with HSBC Bank USA. At December 31, 2009, we had derivative
contracts with a notional value of approximately
$59.7 billion, including $58.6 billion outstanding
with HSBC Bank USA. Derivative financial instruments are
generally expressed in terms of notional principal or contract
amounts which are much larger than the amounts potentially at
risk for nonpayment by counterparties.
To manage our exposure to changes in interest rates, we entered
into interest rate swap agreements and currency swaps which have
been designated as fair value or cash flow hedges under
derivative accounting principles or are treated as
non-qualifying hedges. We currently utilize the long-haul method
to assess effectiveness of all derivatives designated as hedges.
In the tables that follow below, the fair value disclosed does
not include swap collateral that we either receive or deposit
with our interest rate swap counterparties. Such swap collateral
is recorded on our balance sheet at an amount which approximates
fair value and is netted on the balance sheet with the fair
value amount recognized for derivative instruments.
Fair Value Hedges Fair value hedges include
interest rate swaps to convert our fixed rate debt to variable
rate debt and currency swaps to convert debt issued from one
currency into U.S. dollar variable debt. All of our fair
value hedges are associated with debt. We recorded fair value
adjustments for fair value hedges which increased the carrying
value of our debt by $51 million and $85 million at
December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. The following
table provides information related to the location of derivative
fair values in the consolidated balance sheet for our fair value
hedges.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset Derivatives Fair Value
|
|
|
Liability Derivatives Fair Value
|
|
|
|
as of December 31,
|
|
|
as of December 31,
|
|
|
|
Balance Sheet
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance Sheet
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Location
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Location
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
|
Interest rate swaps
|
|
Derivative financial assets
|
|
$
|
(4
|
)
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
Derivative related liabilities
|
|
$
|
18
|
|
|
$
|
39
|
|
Currency swaps
|
|
Derivative financial assets
|
|
|
124
|
|
|
|
312
|
|
|
Derivative related liabilities
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total fair value hedges
|
|
|
|
$
|
120
|
|
|
$
|
312
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
18
|
|
|
$
|
39
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table presents fair value hedging information,
including the gain (loss) recorded on the derivative and where
that gain (loss) is recorded in the consolidated statement of
income (loss) as well as the offsetting gain (loss) on the
hedged item that is recognized in current earnings, the net of
which represents hedge ineffectiveness.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Location of Gain
|
|
Amount of Gain (Loss)
|
|
|
Amount of Gain (Loss)
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) Recognized
|
|
Recognized in Income
|
|
|
Recognized in Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
in Income on Hedged
|
|
on the Derivative
|
|
|
on Hedged Item
|
|
|
|
Hedged Item
|
|
Item and Derivative
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swaps
|
|
Fixed rate borrowings
|
|
Derivative related income
|
|
$
|
17
|
|
|
$
|
(13
|
)
|
|
$
|
35
|
|
|
$
|
7
|
|
|
$
|
21
|
|
|
$
|
(47
|
)
|
Currency swaps
|
|
Fixed rate borrowings
|
|
Derivative related income
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
112
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
(34
|
)
|
|
|
(88
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
4
|
|
|
$
|
22
|
|
|
$
|
147
|
|
|
$
|
19
|
|
|
$
|
(13
|
)
|
|
$
|
(135
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flow Hedges Cash flow hedges include
interest rate swaps to convert our variable rate debt to fixed
rate debt and to fix future interest rate resets of floating
rate debt as well as currency swaps to convert debt issued from
one currency into U.S. dollar fixed rate debt. Gains and
losses on unexpired derivative instruments designated as cash
flow hedges are reported in accumulated other comprehensive
income (loss) (OCI) net of tax and totaled a loss of
$492 million and $490 million at December 31,
2010 and 2009, respectively. We expect $408 million
($264 million after-tax) of currently unrealized net losses
will be reclassified to earnings within one year. However, these
reclassed unrealized losses will be offset by decreased interest
expense associated with the variable cash flows of the
47
HSBC Finance Corporation
hedged items and will result in no significant net economic
impact to our earnings. The following table provides information
related to the location of derivative fair values in the
consolidated balance sheet for our cash flow hedges.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset Derivatives Fair Value
|
|
|
Liability Derivatives Fair Value
|
|
|
|
as of December 31,
|
|
|
as of December 31,
|
|
|
|
Balance Sheet
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance Sheet
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Location
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Location
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
|
Interest rate swaps
|
|
Derivative financial assets
|
|
$
|
(437
|
)
|
|
$
|
(358
|
)
|
|
Derivative related liabilities
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
Currency swaps
|
|
Derivative financial assets
|
|
|
985
|
|
|
|
1,362
|
|
|
Derivative related liabilities
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cash flow hedges
|
|
|
|
$
|
548
|
|
|
$
|
1,004
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table provides the gain or loss recorded on our
cash flow hedging relationships.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain (Loss)
|
|
|
|
Gain (Loss)
|
|
|
Location of Gain
|
|
Gain (Loss) Reclassed
|
|
|
Location of Gain
|
|
Recognized
|
|
|
|
Recognized in OCI
|
|
|
(Loss) Reclassified
|
|
From AOCI
|
|
|
(Loss) Recognized
|
|
in Income
|
|
|
|
on Derivative (Effective
|
|
|
from AOCI into
|
|
into Income
|
|
|
in Income
|
|
on Derivative
|
|
|
|
Portion)
|
|
|
Income
|
|
(Effective Portion)
|
|
|
on the Derivative
|
|
(Ineffective Portion)
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
(Effective Portion)
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
(Ineffective Portion)
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swaps
|
|
$
|
(65
|
)
|
|
$
|
473
|
|
|
$
|
(567
|
)
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
$
|
(62
|
)
|
|
$
|
(24
|
)
|
|
$
|
(12
|
)
|
|
Derivative related income
|
|
$
|
(1
|
)
|
|
$
|
12
|
|
|
$
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
Gain on bulk
receivable sale to
HSBC affiliates
Interest expense
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(80
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Currency swaps
|
|
|
70
|
|
|
|
441
|
|
|
|
(478
|
)
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(34
|
)
|
|
|
(51
|
)
|
|
|
(89
|
)
|
|
Derivative related income
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
82
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
5
|
|
|
$
|
914
|
|
|
$
|
(1,045
|
)
|
|
|
|
$
|
(96
|
)
|
|
$
|
(155
|
)
|
|
$
|
(101
|
)
|
|
|
|
$
|
(8
|
)
|
|
$
|
94
|
|
|
$
|
18
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Qualifying Hedging Activities We
may enter into interest rate and currency swaps which are not
designated as hedges under derivative accounting principles.
These financial instruments are economic hedges but do not
qualify for hedge accounting and are primarily used to minimize
our exposure to changes in interest rates and currency exchange
rates through more closely matching both the structure and
projected duration of our liabilities to the structure and
duration of our assets. The following table provides information
related to the location and derivative fair values in the
consolidated balance sheet for our non-qualifying hedges:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset Derivatives Fair Value
|
|
|
Liability Derivatives Fair Value
|
|
|
|
as of December 31,
|
|
|
as of December 31,
|
|
|
|
Balance Sheet
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance Sheet
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Location
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Location
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
|
Interest rate swaps
|
|
Derivative financial assets
|
|
$
|
165
|
|
|
$
|
188
|
|
|
Derivative related liabilities
|
|
$
|
5
|
|
|
$
|
12
|
|
Currency swaps
|
|
Derivative financial assets
|
|
|
67
|
|
|
|
72
|
|
|
Derivative related liabilities
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
$
|
232
|
|
|
$
|
260
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
5
|
|
|
$
|
21
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
48
HSBC Finance Corporation
The following table provides detail of the realized and
unrealized gain or loss recorded on our non-qualifying hedges:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount of Gain (Loss)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recognized
|
|
|
|
Location of Gain (Loss)
|
|
in Derivative Related Income
|
|
|
|
Recognized in
|
|
(Expense)
|
|
|
|
Income on Derivative
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
|
Interest rate contracts
|
|
Derivative related income
|
|
$
|
(394
|
)
|
|
$
|
200
|
|
|
$
|
(361
|
)
|
Currency contracts
|
|
Derivative related income
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
$
|
(394
|
)
|
|
$
|
197
|
|
|
$
|
(336
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We have elected the fair value option for certain issuances of
our fixed rate debt and have entered into interest rate and
currency swaps related to debt carried at fair value. The
interest rate and currency swaps associated with this debt are
non-qualifying hedges but are considered economic hedges and
realized gains and losses are reported as Gain (loss) on
debt designated at fair value and related derivatives
within other revenues. The derivatives related to fair value
option debt are included in the tables below. See Note 16,
Fair Value Option, for further discussion.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset Derivatives Fair Value
|
|
|
Liability Derivatives Fair Value
|
|
|
|
as of December 31,
|
|
|
as of December 31,
|
|
|
|
Balance Sheet
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance Sheet
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Location
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Location
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
|
Interest rate swaps
|
|
Derivative financial assets
|
|
$
|
907
|
|
|
$
|
1,034
|
|
|
Derivative related liabilities
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
Currency swaps
|
|
Derivative financial assets
|
|
|
739
|
|
|
|
752
|
|
|
Derivative related liabilities
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,646
|
|
|
$
|
1,786
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table provides the gain or loss recorded on the
derivatives related to fair value option debt primarily due to
changes in interest rates:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount of Gain (Loss)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recognized
|
|
|
|
|
|
in Derivative Related Income
|
|
|
|
Location of Gain (Loss)
|
|
(Expense)
|
|
|
|
Recognized in Income on Derivative
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
|
Interest rate contracts
|
|
Gain (loss) on debt designated at fair value and related
derivatives
|
|
$
|
719
|
|
|
$
|
(39
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,703
|
|
Currency contracts
|
|
Gain (loss) on debt designated at fair value and related
derivatives
|
|
|
182
|
|
|
|
185
|
|
|
|
308
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
$
|
901
|
|
|
$
|
146
|
|
|
$
|
2,011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
49
HSBC Finance Corporation
Notional Value of Derivative Contracts The
following table summarizes the notional values of derivative
contracts:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31,
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
|
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swaps
|
|
$
|
8,917
|
|
|
$
|
11,585
|
|
Currency swaps
|
|
|
10,018
|
|
|
|
15,373
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,935
|
|
|
|
26,958
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-qualifying economic hedges:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Swaps
|
|
|
11,449
|
|
|
|
7,081
|
|
Purchased caps
|
|
|
173
|
|
|
|
682
|
|
Foreign exchange:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Swaps
|
|
|
1,221
|
|
|
|
1,291
|
|
Forwards
|
|
|
123
|
|
|
|
349
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,966
|
|
|
|
9,403
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives associated with debt carried at fair value:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swaps
|
|
|
15,212
|
|
|
|
19,169
|
|
Currency swaps
|
|
|
3,376
|
|
|
|
4,122
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,588
|
|
|
|
23,291
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
50,489
|
|
|
$
|
59,652
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total income taxes were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
|
Provision (benefit) for income taxes related to continuing
operations
|
|
$
|
(1,007
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2,632
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,087
|
)
|
Income taxes related to adjustments included in common
shareholders equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized gains (losses) on securities
available-for-sale,
not
other-than-temporarily
impaired, net
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
|
(31
|
)
|
Unrealized gains (losses) on
other-than-temporarily
impaired debt securities
available-for-sale
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
Unrealized gains (losses) on cash flow hedging instruments
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
|
387
|
|
|
|
(370
|
)
|
Changes in funded status of pension and post retirement benefit
plans
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
Foreign currency translation adjustments
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
(46
|
)
|
Exercise of stock based compensation
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
Valuation allowance
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
(944
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2,190
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,506
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50
HSBC Finance Corporation
Provisions for income taxes related to our continuing operations
were:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
|
Current provision (benefit):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States
|
|
$
|
(1,322
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2,386
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,085
|
)
|
Foreign
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current provision (benefit)
|
|
|
(1,322
|
)
|
|
|
(2,385
|
)
|
|
|
(1,074
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred provision (benefit):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States
|
|
|
315
|
|
|
|
(247
|
)
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred provision (benefit)
|
|
|
315
|
|
|
|
(247
|
)
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total income provision (benefit)
|
|
$
|
(1,007
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2,632
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,087
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The significant components of deferred provisions attributable
to income from continuing operations were:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
|
Deferred income tax (benefit) provision (excluding the effects
of other components)
|
|
$
|
274
|
|
|
$
|
(204
|
)
|
|
$
|
(291
|
)
|
Increase in valuation allowance
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
|
209
|
|
|
|
316
|
|
Change in operating loss carryforwards
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
(282
|
)
|
|
|
(107
|
)
|
Adjustment to statutory tax rate
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
69
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred income tax provision
|
|
$
|
315
|
|
|
$
|
(247
|
)
|
|
$
|
(13
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A reconciliation of income tax expense (benefit) compared with
the amounts at the U.S. federal statutory rates was as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
(dollars are in millions)
|
|
|
Tax benefit at the U.S. federal statutory income tax rate
|
|
$
|
(1,017
|
)
|
|
|
(35.0
|
)%
|
|
$
|
(3,534
|
)
|
|
|
(35.0
|
)%
|
|
$
|
(1,293
|
)
|
|
|
(35.0
|
)%
|
Increase (decrease) in rate resulting from:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
State and local taxes, net of Federal benefit
|
|
|
(15
|
)
|
|
|
(.5
|
)
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
.3
|
|
|
|
(52
|
)
|
|
|
(1.4
|
)
|
State rate change effect on net deferred taxes
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
.3
|
|
|
|
70
|
|
|
|
1.9
|
|
Non-deductible goodwill
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
798
|
|
|
|
7.9
|
|
|
|
115
|
|
|
|
3.1
|
|
Low income housing and other tax credits
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(19
|
)
|
|
|
(.2
|
)
|
|
|
(50
|
)
|
|
|
(1.4
|
)
|
Leveraged leases
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
|
1.7
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
.2
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
.9
|
|
Other
|
|
|
(23
|
)
|
|
|
(.9
|
)
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
.4
|
|
|
|
89
|
|
|
|
2.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total income tax benefit
|
|
$
|
(1,007
|
)
|
|
|
(34.7
|
)%
|
|
$
|
(2,632
|
)
|
|
|
(26.1
|
)%
|
|
$
|
(1,087
|
)
|
|
|
(29.4
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The effective tax rate for continuing operations in 2010 was
primarily impacted by state taxes, including states where we
file combined unitary state tax returns with other HSBC
affiliates and amortization of purchase accounting adjustments
on leveraged leases that matured in December 2010. The effective
tax rate for continuing operations in 2009 was significantly
impacted by the non-tax deductible impairment of goodwill, the
relative level of pretax book loss, increase in the state and
local income tax valuation allowance, and a decrease in low
income housing credits. The effective tax in 2008 was
significantly impacted by the non-deductible goodwill
impairment, an increase in the state and local income tax
valuation allowance as well as a change in estimate in the state
tax rate for jurisdictions where we file combined unitary state
tax returns with other HSBC affiliates.
51
HSBC Finance Corporation
Temporary differences which gave rise to a significant portion
of deferred tax assets and liabilities were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31,
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
|
Deferred Tax Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credit loss reserves
|
|
$
|
2,497
|
|
|
$
|
2,837
|
|
Unused tax benefit carryforwards
|
|
|
796
|
|
|
|
790
|
|
Market value adjustment
|
|
|
318
|
|
|
|
586
|
|
Other
|
|
|
516
|
|
|
|
658
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred tax assets
|
|
|
4,127
|
|
|
|
4,871
|
|
Valuation allowance
|
|
|
(720
|
)
|
|
|
(671
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred tax assets net of valuation allowance
|
|
|
3,407
|
|
|
|
4,200
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred Tax Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fee income
|
|
|
412
|
|
|
|
626
|
|
Deferred loan origination costs
|
|
|
290
|
|
|
|
306
|
|
Intangibles
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
185
|
|
Receivables sold
|
|
|
99
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Leveraged leases
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
73
|
|
Other
|
|
|
115
|
|
|
|
123
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred tax liabilities
|
|
|
916
|
|
|
|
1,313
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred tax asset
|
|
$
|
2,491
|
|
|
$
|
2,887
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The decrease in the credit loss reserves component of the
deferred tax asset in 2010 reflects increased levels of
charge-offs recorded during the year.
The deferred tax valuation allowance is attributed to the
following deferred tax assets that based on the available
evidence it is more-likely-than-not that the deferred tax asset
will not be realized:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31,
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
|
State tax benefit loss limitations
|
|
$
|
537
|
|
|
$
|
480
|
|
Deferred capital loss on sale to affiliates
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
|
49
|
|
Foreign tax credit carryforward
|
|
|
127
|
|
|
|
127
|
|
Other
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
720
|
|
|
$
|
671
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of
unrecognized tax benefits is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of year
|
|
$
|
196
|
|
|
$
|
199
|
|
Additions based on tax positions related to the current year
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
Additions for tax positions of prior years
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
Reductions for tax positions of prior years
|
|
|
(27
|
)
|
|
|
(21
|
)
|
Settlements
|
|
|
(33
|
)
|
|
|
(17
|
)
|
Reductions for lapse of statute of limitations
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of year
|
|
$
|
169
|
|
|
$
|
196
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
52
HSBC Finance Corporation
The state tax portion of these amounts is reflected gross and
not reduced by the federal tax effect. The total amount of
unrecognized tax benefits that, if recognized, would affect the
effective tax rate was $96 million and $110 million at
December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively.
It is our policy to recognize accrued interest related to
unrecognized tax benefits in interest expense in the
consolidated statement of income (loss) and to recognize
penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits as a component of
other servicing and administrative expenses in the consolidated
statement of income (loss). We had accruals for the payment of
interest and penalties associated with uncertain tax positions
of $76 million and $78 million at December 31,
2010 and 2009, respectively. We decreased our accrual for the
payment of interest and penalties associated with uncertain tax
positions by $2 million and $1 million during 2010 and
2009, respectively.
HSBC North America Consolidated Income
Taxes We are included in HSBC North Americas
consolidated Federal income tax return and in various combined
state income tax returns. As such, we have entered into a tax
allocation agreement with HSBC North America and its subsidiary
entities (the HNAH Group) included in the
consolidated returns which govern the current amount of taxes to
be paid or received by the various entities included in the
consolidated return filings. As a result, we have looked at the
HNAH Groups consolidated deferred tax assets and various
sources of taxable income, including the impact of HSBC and HNAH
Group tax planning strategies, in reaching conclusions on
recoverability of deferred tax assets. Where a valuation
allowance is determined to be necessary at the HSBC North
America consolidated level, such allowance is allocated to the
principal subsidiaries within the HNAH Group as described below
in a manner that is systematic, rational and consistent with the
broad principles of accounting for income taxes.
The HNAH Group evaluates deferred tax assets for recoverability
using a consistent approach which considers the relative impact
of negative and positive evidence, including historical
financial performance, projections of future taxable income,
future reversals of existing taxable temporary differences, tax
planning strategies and any available carryback capacity.
In evaluating the need for a valuation allowance, the HNAH Group
estimates future taxable income based on management approved
business plans, future capital requirements and ongoing tax
planning strategies, including capital support from HSBC
necessary as part of such plans and strategies. The HNAH Group
has continued to consider the impact of the economic environment
on the North American businesses and the expected growth of the
deferred tax assets. This evaluation process involves
significant management judgment about assumptions that are
subject to change from period to period.
In conjunction with the HNAH Group deferred tax evaluation
process, based on our forecasts of future taxable income, which
include assumptions about the depth and severity of home price
depreciation and the U.S. economic downturn, including
unemployment levels and their related impact on credit losses,
we currently anticipate that our results of future operations
will generate sufficient taxable income to allow us to realize
our deferred tax assets. However, since these market conditions
have created losses in the HNAH Group in recent periods and
volatility on our pre-tax book income, our analysis of the
realizability of the deferred tax assets significantly discounts
any future taxable income expected from continuing operations
and relies to a greater extent on continued capital support from
our parent, HSBC, including tax planning strategies implemented
in relation to such support. HSBC has indicated they remain
fully committed and have the capacity and willingness to provide
capital as needed to run operations, maintain sufficient
regulatory capital, and fund certain tax planning strategies.
Only those tax planning strategies that are both prudent and
feasible, and which management has the ability and intent to
implement, are incorporated into our analysis and assessment.
The primary and most significant strategy is HSBCs
commitment to reinvest excess HNAH Group capital to reduce debt
funding or otherwise invest in assets to ensure that it is more
likely than not that the deferred tax assets will be utilized.
Currently, it has been determined that the HNAH Groups
primary tax planning strategy, in combination with other tax
planning strategies, provides support for the realization of the
net deferred tax assets recorded for the HNAH Group. Such
determination is based on HSBCs business forecasts and
assessment as to the most efficient and effective deployment of
HSBC capital, most importantly including the length of time such
capital will need to be maintained in the U.S. for purposes
of the tax planning strategy.
53
HSBC Finance Corporation
Notwithstanding the above, the HNAH Group has valuation
allowances against certain specific tax attributes such as
foreign tax credits, certain state related deferred tax assets
and certain tax loss carryforwards for which the aforementioned
tax planning strategies do not provide appropriate support.
HNAH Group valuation allowances are allocated to the principal
subsidiaries, including us. The methodology allocates the
valuation allowance to the principal subsidiaries based
primarily on the entitys relative contribution to the
growth of the HSBC North America consolidated deferred tax asset
against which the valuation allowance is being recorded.
If future results differ from the HNAH Groups current
forecasts or the primary tax planning strategy were to change, a
valuation allowance against the remaining net deferred tax
assets may need to be established which could have a material
adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition
and capital position. The HNAH Group will continue to update its
assumptions and forecasts of future taxable income, including
relevant tax planning strategies, and assess the need for such
incremental valuation allowances.
Absent the capital support from HSBC and implementation of the
related tax planning strategies, the HNAH Group, including us,
would be required to record a valuation allowance against the
remaining deferred tax assets.
HSBC Finance Corporation Income Taxes We
recognize deferred tax assets and liabilities for the future tax
consequences related to differences between the financial
statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities
and their respective tax bases, and for tax credits and net
operating and other losses. Our net deferred tax assets,
including deferred tax liabilities and valuation allowances,
totaled $2.5 billion and $2.9 billion as of
December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively.
We remain subject to Federal income tax examination for years
1998 and forward and state income tax examinations for years
1996 and forward. It is reasonably possible that there could be
a change in the amount of our unrecognized tax benefits within
the next 12 months due to settlements or statutory
expirations in various tax jurisdictions.
In November 2009, President Obama signed into law The
Worker, Homeownership, and Business Assistance Act of 2009
which allows for an extended carryback period for certain
federal tax net operating losses. Our deferred tax asset related
to such losses was reduced by $1.6 billion as a result of
this legislation during 2009.
In May 2008, we sold all of the common stock of Household
International Europe, the holding company for our U.K.
Operations to HSBC Overseas Holdings (UK) Limited for a loss. No
tax benefit was recognized on the loss on sale because the sale
was between affiliates under common control, the capital loss
was deferred and a valuation allowance was established on the
$49 million deferred tax asset relating to the future
realization of the deferred tax capital loss. The deferred tax
capital loss could be recognized if the stock of Household
International Europe is sold to an unaffiliated third party.
Capital losses may only be offset by capital gains and have a
five-year carryforward period. In November 2008, we transferred
the common stock of HSBC Financial Corporation Limited, the
holding company for our Canadian Operations to HSBC Bank Canada
(HBCA). No tax benefit was recognized on the
transfer due to loss disallowance rules.
54
HSBC Finance Corporation
At December 31, 2010, we had net operating loss
carryforwards of $10.1 billion for state tax purposes which
expire as follows: $151 million in
2011-2015;
$356 million in
2016-2020;
$1.9 billion in
2021-2025;
and $7.7 billion in 2026 and forward.
At December 31, 2010, we had foreign tax credit
carryforwards of $127 million for federal income tax
purposes which expire as follows: $43 million in 2015;
$36 million in 2016; and $21 million in 2017; and
$27 million in 2018.
At December 31, 2010, we had general business tax credit
carryforwards of $87 million for federal income tax
purposes which expire as follows: $18 million in 2026;
$50 million in 2028; and $19 million in 2029.
|
|
19.
|
Redeemable
Preferred Stock
|
In November 2010, we issued 1,000 shares of
8.625 percent Non-Cumulative Preferred Stock, Series C
(Series C Preferred Stock) to our parent, HINO,
for a cash purchase price of $1.0 billion. Dividends on the
Series C Preferred Stock are non-cumulative and payable
quarterly at a rate of 8.625 percent. The Series C
Preferred Stock may be redeemed at our option after
November 30, 2025 at $1,000,000 per share, plus accrued
dividends. The redemption and liquidation value is $1,000,000
per share plus accrued and unpaid dividends. The holders of
Series C Preferred Stock are entitled to payment before any
capital distribution is made to the common shareholder and have
no voting rights except for the right to elect two additional
members to the board of directors in the event that dividends
have not been declared and paid for six quarters, or as
otherwise provided by law. Additionally, as long as any shares
of the Series C Preferred Stock are outstanding, the
authorization, creation or issuance of any class or series of
stock that would rank prior to the Series C Preferred Stock
with respect to dividends or amounts payable upon liquidation or
dissolution of HSBC Finance Corporation must be approved by the
holders of at least two-thirds of the shares of Series C
Preferred Stock outstanding at that time. Dividend payments will
begin during the first quarter of 2011.
In June 2005, we issued 575,000 shares of 6.36 percent
Non-Cumulative Preferred Stock, Series B
(Series B Preferred Stock). Dividends on the
Series B Preferred Stock are non-cumulative and payable
quarterly at a rate of 6.36 percent. The Series B
Preferred Stock may be redeemed at our option after
June 23, 2010 at $1,000 per share, plus accrued dividends.
The redemption and liquidation value is $1,000 per share plus
accrued and unpaid dividends. The holders of Series B
Preferred Stock are entitled to payment before any capital
distribution is made to the common shareholder and have no
voting rights except for the right to elect two additional
members to the board of directors in the event that dividends
have not been declared and paid for six quarters, or as
otherwise provided by law. Additionally, as long as any shares
of the Series B Preferred Stock are outstanding, the
authorization, creation or issuance of any class or series of
stock which would rank prior to the Series B Preferred
Stock with respect to dividends or amounts payable upon
liquidation or dissolution of HSBC Finance Corporation must be
approved by the holders of at least two-thirds of the shares of
Series B Preferred Stock outstanding at that time. In 2010
and 2009, we declared dividends totaling $37 million on the
Series B Preferred Stock which were paid prior to
December 31, 2010 and 2009.
55
HSBC Finance Corporation
|
|
20.
|
Accumulated
Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) (AOCI)
includes certain items that are reported directly within a
separate component of shareholders equity. The following
table presents changes in accumulated other comprehensive income
balances.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
|
Unrealized gains (losses) on cash flow hedging
instruments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of period
|
|
$
|
(632
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,316
|
)
|
|
$
|
(718
|
)
|
Other comprehensive income for period:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net gains (losses) arising during period, net of tax of
$41 million, $329 million and $(381) million,
respectively
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
|
585
|
|
|
|
(675
|
)
|
Reclassification adjustment for (gains) losses realized in net
income, net of tax of $2 million, $56 million and
$36 million, respectively
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
99
|
|
|
|
65
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other comprehensive income for period
|
|
|
57
|
|
|
|
684
|
|
|
|
(610
|
)
|
Reclassification adjustment due to sale of Canadian Operations
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of period
|
|
|
(575
|
)
|
|
|
(632
|
)
|
|
|
(1,316
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized gains (losses) on securities
available-for-sale,
not other-than temporarily impaired:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of period
|
|
$
|
38
|
|
|
$
|
(54
|
)
|
|
$
|
(13
|
)
|
Other comprehensive income for period:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net unrealized holding gains (losses) arising during period, net
of tax of $25 million, $48 million and
$(31) million, respectively
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
|
85
|
|
|
|
(59
|
)
|
Reclassification adjustment for (gains) losses realized in net
income, net of tax of $(3) million, $3 million and
$2 million, respectively
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other comprehensive income for period
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
92
|
|
|
|
(53
|
)
|
Reclassification adjustment due to sale of Canadian Operations
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of period
|
|
|
78
|
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
|
(54
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized gains (losses) on
other-than-temporarily
impaired debt securities
available-for-sale:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of period
|
|
$
|
(7
|
)
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
Other comprehensive income for period:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other-than-temporary
impairment on debt securities
available-for-sale
recognized in other comprehensive income, net of tax of
$1 million, $(6) million and $- million, respectively
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
Reclassification adjustment for (gains) losses realized in net
income, net of tax of $- million, $2 million and $-
million, respectively
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other comprehensive loss for period
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of period
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
56
HSBC Finance Corporation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
|
Pension liability:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of period
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
Other comprehensive income for period:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Postretirement benefit plan adjustment, net of tax of
$(5) million, $2 million and $(4) million,
respectively
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other comprehensive income for period
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
Reclassification adjustment due to sale of U.K. Operations
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
Reclassification adjustment due to sale of Canadian Operations
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of period
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency translation adjustments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of period
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
514
|
|
Other comprehensive loss for period:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Translation gains (losses), net of tax of $2 million,
$8 million and $(43) million, respectively
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
(120
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other comprehensive income for period
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
(120
|
)
|
Reclassification adjustment due to sale of U.K. Operations
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(370
|
)
|
Reclassification adjustment due to sale of Canadian Operations
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(36
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of period
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total accumulated other comprehensive loss at end of period
|
|
$
|
(491
|
)
|
|
$
|
(583
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,378
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted Share Plans Subsequent to our
acquisition by HSBC, key employees have been provided awards in
the form of restricted shares (RSRs) and restricted
stock units (RSUs) under the Group Share Plan. These
shares have been granted as both time vested (3 year
vesting)
and/or
performance contingent (3 and 4 year vesting) awards. We
also issue a small number of off-cycle grants each year for
recruitment and retention. These RSR awards vest over a varying
period of time depending on the nature of the award, the longest
of which vests over a five year period. Annual awards to
employees in 2004 vested over five years contingent upon the
achievement of certain company performance targets.
Information with respect to RSR and RSUs awarded under
HSBCs Restricted Share Plan/Group Share Plan, all of which
are in HSBC ordinary shares, is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
|
RSR and RSUs awarded
|
|
|
964,927
|
|
|
|
4,618,923
|
|
|
|
3,566,510
|
|
Weighted-average fair market value per share
|
|
$
|
10.36
|
|
|
$
|
8.78
|
|
|
$
|
16.45
|
|
RSR and RSUs outstanding at December 31
|
|
|
4,038,870
|
|
|
|
9,559,886
|
|
|
|
12,102,259
|
|
Compensation cost: (in millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pre-tax
|
|
$
|
14
|
|
|
$
|
27
|
|
|
$
|
37
|
|
After-tax
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
Employee Stock Purchase Plans The HSBC Holdings
Savings-Related Share Option Plan (the HSBC Sharesave
Plan), allows eligible employees to enter into savings
contracts to save up to the equivalent of 250 pounds sterling
per month, with the option to use the savings to acquire
ordinary shares of HSBC at the end of the contract period. There
are currently three types of plans offered which allow the
participant to select savings contracts of 1, 3 or 5 year
length. The options for the 1 year plan are automatically
exercised if the current share price is at or above the strike
price, which is at a 15 percent discount to the fair market
value of the shares on grant date. If the current share
57
HSBC Finance Corporation
price is below the strike price, the participants have the
ability to exercise the option during the three months following
the maturity date if the share price rises. The options under
the 3 and 5 year plans are exercisable within six months
following the third or fifth year, respectively, of the
commencement of the related savings contract, at a
20 percent discount for options granted. HSBC ordinary
shares granted and the related fair value of the options for
2010, 2009 and 2008 are presented below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
|
HSBC
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
HSBC
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
HSBC
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Ordinary
|
|
Per Share of
|
|
Ordinary
|
|
Per Share of
|
|
Ordinary
|
|
Per Share of
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
Shares
|
|
Shares
|
|
Shares
|
|
Shares
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
Granted
|
|
Granted
|
|
Granted
|
|
Granted
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
1 year vesting period
|
|
|
115,205
|
|
|
$
|
2.00
|
|
|
|
425,259
|
|
|
$
|
2.07
|
|
|
|
305,147
|
|
|
$
|
3.10
|
|
3 year vesting period
|
|
|
120,591
|
|
|
|
2.57
|
|
|
|
738,859
|
|
|
|
2.41
|
|
|
|
660,727
|
|
|
|
3.93
|
|
5 year vesting period
|
|
|
31,276
|
|
|
|
2.76
|
|
|
|
379,170
|
|
|
|
2.19
|
|
|
|
208,019
|
|
|
|
4.18
|
|
Compensation expense related to the grants under the HSBC
Sharesave Plan totaled $1 million in 2010, $3 million
in 2009 and $3 million in 2008. As of December 31,
2010, future compensation cost related to grants which have not
yet fully vested is approximately $9 million. This amount
is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of
0.94 years.
The fair value of each option granted under the HSBC Sharesave
Plan was estimated as of the date of grant using a third party
option pricing model. The significant assumptions used to
estimate the fair value of the options granted by year are as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Risk-free interest rate
|
|
.47 - 2.63%
|
|
.52 - 2.10%
|
|
1.85 - 3.03%
|
Expected life
|
|
1, 3 or 5 years
|
|
1, 3 or 5 years
|
|
1, 3 or 5 years
|
Expected volatility
|
|
30%
|
|
50%, 35%, 30%
|
|
25%
|
Stock Option Plans The HSBC Holdings Group Share
Option Plan (the Group Share Option Plan), which
replaced the former Household stock option plans, was a
long-term incentive compensation plan available to certain
employees prior to 2005. Grants were usually made annually. At
the 2005 HSBC Annual Meeting of Stockholders, the shareholders
approved and HSBC adopted the HSBC Share Plan (Group Share
Plan) to replace this plan. Since 2004, no further options
have been granted to employees although stock option grants from
previous years remain in effect subject to the same conditions
as before. In lieu of options, these employees received grants
of shares of HSBC stock subject to certain vesting conditions as
discussed further above. If the performance conditions are not
met by year 5, the options will be forfeited. Options granted to
employees in 2004 vest 100 percent upon the attainment of
certain company performance conditions which were met in 2009
and expire ten years from the date of grant. Such options were
granted at market value. There was no compensation expense
related to the Group Share Option Plan during 2010 or 2009.
58
HSBC Finance Corporation
Information with respect to the Group Share Option Plan is as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-
|
|
|
|
HSBC
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
HSBC
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
HSBC
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
Ordinary
|
|
|
Price per
|
|
|
Ordinary
|
|
|
Price per
|
|
|
Ordinary
|
|
|
Price per
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Share
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Share
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Share
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at beginning of year
|
|
|
6,633,653
|
|
|
$
|
13.05
|
|
|
|
5,780,800
|
|
|
$
|
14.96
|
|
|
|
6,060,800
|
|
|
$
|
14.97
|
|
Options granted due to HSBC plc rights
issuance(1)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
852,853
|
|
|
|
13.05
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Transferred
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(175,000
|
)
|
|
|
15.31
|
|
Expired or canceled
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(105,000
|
)
|
|
|
14.82
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at end of year
|
|
|
6,633,653
|
|
|
|
13.05
|
|
|
|
6,633,653
|
|
|
|
13.05
|
|
|
|
5,780,800
|
|
|
|
14.96
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable at end of year
|
|
|
6,633,653
|
|
|
$
|
13.05
|
|
|
|
6,633,653
|
|
|
$
|
13.05
|
|
|
|
3,654,800
|
|
|
$
|
15.31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
As a result of the HSBC plc share
rights offering, existing holders of share options were granted
additional options of a value such that the rights offering
would not be dilutive to their individual positions.
|
The following table summarizes information about stock options
outstanding under the Group Share Option Plan at
December 31, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options Outstanding
|
|
Options Exercisable
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-
|
|
Weighted-
|
|
|
|
Weighted-
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
Average
|
Range of
|
|
Number
|
|
Remaining
|
|
Exercise
|
|
Number
|
|
Exercise
|
Exercise Prices
|
|
Outstanding
|
|
Life
|
|
Price
|
|
Outstanding
|
|
Price
|
|
|
$12.51 15.00
|
|
|
6,633,653
|
|
|
|
2.98
|
|
|
$
|
13.05
|
|
|
|
6,633,653
|
|
|
$
|
13.05
|
|
Prior to our acquisition by HSBC, certain employees were
eligible to participate in the former Household stock option
plan. Employee stock options generally vested equally over four
years and expired 10 years from the date of grant. Upon
completion of our acquisition by HSBC, all options granted prior
to November 2002 vested and became outstanding options to
purchase HSBC ordinary shares. Options granted under the former
Household plan subsequent to October 2002 were converted into
options to purchase ordinary shares of HSBC, but did not vest
under the change in control. No compensation expense related to
the former Household plan was recorded in 2010, 2009 or 2008 as
all shares under the former Household plan are fully vested.
Information with respect to stock options granted under the
former Household plan is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-
|
|
|
|
HSBC
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
HSBC
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
HSBC
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
Ordinary
|
|
|
Price per
|
|
|
Ordinary
|
|
|
Price per
|
|
|
Ordinary
|
|
|
Price per
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Share
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Share
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Share
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at beginning of year
|
|
|
17,101,975
|
|
|
$
|
16.28
|
|
|
|
19,525,710
|
|
|
$
|
18.23
|
|
|
|
21,159,911
|
|
|
$
|
18.04
|
|
Options granted due to HSBC plc rights
issuance(1)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
2,880,667
|
|
|
|
15.88
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(306,964
|
)
|
|
|
9.29
|
|
|
|
(20,000
|
)
|
|
|
10.66
|
|
|
|
(262,437
|
)
|
|
|
13.35
|
|
Transferred in/(out)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(719,846
|
)
|
|
|
18.29
|
|
Expired or canceled
|
|
|
(6,052,842
|
)
|
|
|
16.10
|
|
|
|
(5,284,402
|
)
|
|
|
14.61
|
|
|
|
(651,918
|
)
|
|
|
14.16
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at end of year
|
|
|
10,742,169
|
|
|
$
|
16.58
|
|
|
|
17,101,975
|
|
|
$
|
16.28
|
|
|
|
19,525,710
|
|
|
$
|
18.23
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable at end of year
|
|
|
10,742,169
|
|
|
$
|
16.58
|
|
|
|
17,101,975
|
|
|
$
|
16.28
|
|
|
|
19,525,710
|
|
|
$
|
18.23
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
As a result of the HSBC plc share
rights offering, existing holders of share options were granted
additional options of a value such that the rights offering
would not be dilutive to their individual positions.
|
59
HSBC Finance Corporation
The following table summarizes information about the number of
HSBC ordinary shares subject to outstanding stock options under
the former Household plan, at December 31, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options Outstanding
|
|
Options Exercisable
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-
|
|
Weighted-
|
|
|
|
Weighted-
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
Average
|
Range of
|
|
Number
|
|
Remaining
|
|
Exercise
|
|
Number
|
|
Exercise
|
Exercise Prices
|
|
Outstanding
|
|
Life
|
|
Price
|
|
Outstanding
|
|
Price
|
|
|
$9.01 $12.50
|
|
|
2,345,452
|
|
|
|
1.87
|
|
|
$
|
9.29
|
|
|
|
2,345,452
|
|
|
$
|
9.29
|
|
$17.51 $20.00
|
|
|
8,396,717
|
|
|
|
.87
|
|
|
|
18.62
|
|
|
|
8,396,717
|
|
|
|
18.62
|
|
|
|
22.
|
Pension
and Other Postretirement Benefits
|
Defined Benefit Pension Plan Effective
January 1, 2005, our previously separate qualified defined
benefit pension plan was combined with that of HSBC Bank
USAs into a single HSBC North America qualified defined
benefit pension plan (either the HSBC North America
Pension Plan or the Plan) which facilitates
the development of a unified employee benefit policy and unified
employee benefit plan administration for HSBC companies
operating in the U.S.
The table below reflects the portion of pension expense and its
related components of the HSBC North America Pension Plan which
has been allocated to us and is recorded in our consolidated
statement of income (loss).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
|
Service cost benefits earned during the period
|
|
$
|
18
|
|
|
$
|
27
|
|
|
$
|
46
|
|
Interest cost on projected benefit obligation
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
|
64
|
|
|
|
66
|
|
Expected return on assets
|
|
|
(57
|
)
|
|
|
(45
|
)
|
|
|
(77
|
)
|
Partial plan
termination(1)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Recognized losses
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension expense
|
|
$
|
54
|
|
|
$
|
88
|
|
|
$
|
36
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Effective September 30, 2009,
HSBC North America voluntarily chose to allow all plan
participants whose employment was terminated as a result of the
strategic restructuring of its businesses between 2007 and 2009
to become fully vested in their accrued pension benefit,
resulting in a partial termination of the plan. In accordance
with interpretations of the Internal Revenue Service relating to
partial plan terminations, plan participants who voluntarily
left the employment of HSBC North America or its subsidiaries
during this period were also deemed to have vested in their
accrued pension benefit through the date their employment ended.
As a result, incremental pension expense of $9 million,
representing our share of the partial plan termination cost, was
recognized during 2009.
|
Pension expense declined during 2010 due to lower service cost
and interest cost as a result of reduced headcount. Also
contributing to lower pension expense was an increase in the
expected return of plan assets primarily due to higher asset
levels.
During the first quarter of 2010, we announced that the Board of
Directors of HSBC North America had approved a plan to cease all
future benefit accruals for legacy participants under the final
average pay formula components of the HSBC North America Pension
Plan effective January 1, 2011. Future accruals to legacy
participants under the Plan will thereafter be provided under
the cash balance based formula which is now used to calculate
benefits for employees hired after December 31, 1999.
Furthermore, all future benefit accruals under the Supplemental
Retirement Income Plan will also cease effective January 1,
2011.
The aforementioned changes to the Plan have been accounted for
as a negative plan amendment and, therefore, the reduction in
our share of HSBC North Americas projected benefit
obligation as a result of this decision will be amortized to net
periodic pension cost over the future service periods of the
affected employees. The changes to the Supplemental Retirement
Income Plan have been accounted for as a plan curtailment, which
resulted in no significant immediate recognition of income or
expense.
60
HSBC Finance Corporation
The assumptions used in determining pension expense of the HSBC
North America Pension Plan are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Discount rate
|
|
|
5.60
|
%
|
|
|
7.15
|
%
|
|
|
6.55
|
%
|
Salary increase assumption
|
|
|
2.90
|
|
|
|
3.50
|
|
|
|
3.75
|
|
Expected long-term rate of return on Plan assets
|
|
|
7.70
|
|
|
|
8.00
|
|
|
|
8.00
|
|
Long-term historical rates of return in conjunction with our
current outlook of return rates over the term of the pension
obligation are considered in determining an appropriate
long-term rate of return on Plan assets. In this regard, a
best estimate range of expected rates of return on
Plan assets is established by actuaries based on a portfolio of
passive investments considering asset mix upon which a
distribution of compound average returns for such portfolio is
calculated over a 20 year horizon. This approach, however,
ignores the characteristics and performance of the specific
investments the pension plan is invested in, their historical
returns and their performance against industry benchmarks. In
evaluating the range of potential outcomes, a best
estimate range is established between the 25th and
75th percentile. In addition to this analysis, we also seek
the input of the firm which provides us pension advisory
services. This firm performs an analysis similar to that done by
our actuaries, but instead uses real investment types and
considers historical fund manager performance. In this regard,
we also focus on the range of possible outcomes between the
25th and 75th percentile, with a focus on the
50th percentile. The combination of these analyses creates
a range of potential long-term rate of return assumptions from
which we determine an appropriate rate.
Given the Plans current allocation of equity and fixed
income securities and using investment return assumptions which
are based on long term historical data, the long term expected
return for plan assets is reasonable.
Investment Strategy for Plan Assets The
primary objective of the HSBC North America Pension Plan is to
provide eligible employees with regular pension benefits. Since
the plan is governed by the Employee Retirement Security Act of
1974 (ERISA), ERISA regulations serve as guidance
for the management of plan assets. In this regard, an Investment
Committee (the Committee) for the Plan has been
established and its members have been appointed by the Chief
Executive Officer as authorized by the Board of Directors of
HSBC North America. The Committee is responsible for
establishing the funding policy and investment objectives
supporting the Plan including allocating the assets of the Plan,
monitoring the diversification of the Plans investments
and investment performance, assuring the Plan does not violate
any provisions of ERISA and the appointment, removal and
monitoring of investment advisers and the trustee. Consistent
with prudent standards for preservation of capital and
maintenance of liquidity, the goal of the Plan is to earn the
highest possible total rate of return consistent with the
Plans tolerance for risk as periodically determined by the
Committee. A key factor shaping the Committees attitude
towards risk is the generally long term nature of the underlying
benefit obligations. The asset allocation decision reflects this
long term horizon as well as the ability and willingness to
accept some short-term variability in the performance of the
portfolio in exchange for the expectation of competitive
long-term investment results for its participants.
The Plans investment committee utilizes a proactive
approach to managing the Plans overall investment
strategy. During the past year, this resulted in the Committee
conducting four quarterly meetings including two strategic
reviews and two in-depth manager performance reviews. These
quarterly meetings are supplemented by the pension support staff
tracking actual investment manager performance versus the
relevant benchmark and absolute return expectations on a monthly
basis. The pension support staff also monitors adherence to
individual investment manager guidelines via a quarterly
compliance certification process. A
sub-committee
consisting of the pension support staff and two members of the
investment committee, including the chairman, are delegated
responsibility for conducting in-depth reviews of managers
performing below expectation. This
sub-committee
also provides replacement recommendations to the Committee when
manager performance fails to meet expectations for an extended
period. During the two strategic reviews in 2010, the Committee
re-examined the Plans asset allocation levels, interest
rate hedging strategy and investment menu options. In October
2010, the Committee unanimously agreed to maintain the
Plans target asset allocation mix in 2010 at
60 percent equity securities, 39 percent fixed income
securities and 1 percent cash. Further, the Committee
agreed to gradually shift to 40 percent equity securities,
59 percent fixed income securities and 1 percent cash
over a 24 month period. Should interest rates rise
61
HSBC Finance Corporation
faster than currently projected by the Committee, the shift to a
higher percentage of fixed income securities will be accelerated.
In order to achieve the return objectives of the Plan,
investment diversification is employed to ensure that adverse
results from one security or security class will not have an
unduly detrimental effect on the entire portfolio.
Diversification is interpreted to include diversification by
type, characteristic, and number of investments as well as
investment style of investment managers and number of investment
managers for a particular investment style. Equity securities
are invested in large, mid and small capitalization domestic
stocks as well as international, global and emerging market
stocks. Fixed income securities are invested in
U.S. Treasuries (including Treasury Inflation Protected
Securities), agencies, corporate bonds, and mortgage and other
asset backed securities. Without sacrificing returns or
increasing risk, the Committee prefers a limited number of
investment manager relationships which improves efficiency of
administration while providing economies of scale with respect
to fees.
Prior to 2009, both third party and affiliate investment
consultants were used to provide investment consulting services
such as recommendations on the type of funds to be utilized,
appropriate fund managers, and the monitoring of the performance
of those fund managers. In 2009, the Committee approved the use
of a third party investment consultant exclusively. Fund
performance is measured against absolute and relative return
objectives. Results are reviewed from both a short-term (less
than 1 year) and intermediate term (three to five year i.e.
a full market cycle) perspective. Separate account fund managers
are prohibited from investing in all HSBC Securities, restricted
stock (except Rule 144(a) securities which are not
prohibited investments), short-sale contracts, non-financial
commodities, investments in private companies, leveraged
investments and any futures or options (unless used for hedging
purposes and approved by the Committee). Commingled account and
limited partnership fund managers however are allowed to invest
in the preceding to the extent allowed in each of their offering
memoranda. As a result of the current low interest rate
environment and expectation that interest rates will rise in the
future, the Committee mandated the suspension of its previously
approved interest rate hedging strategy in June 2009. Outside of
the approved interest rate hedging strategy, the use of
derivative strategies by investment managers must be explicitly
authorized by the Committee. Such derivatives may be used only
to hedge an accounts investment risk or to replicate an
investment that would otherwise be made directly in the cash
market.
The Committee expects total investment performance to exceed the
following long-term performance objectives:
|
|
|
|
|
A long-term return of 7.25 percent;
|
|
|
|
A passive, blended index comprised of 19.5 percent S&P
500, 12 percent Russell 2000, 11 percent EAFE,
8 percent MSCI AC World Free Index, 2 percent
S&P/Citigroup Extended Market World Ex-US, 7.5 percent
MSCI Emerging Markets, 29 percent Barclays Long Gov/Credit,
10 percent Barclays Treasury Inflation Protected Securities
and 1 percent
90-day
T-Bills; and
|
|
|
|
Above median performance of peer corporate pension plans.
|
62
HSBC Finance Corporation
HSBC North Americas overall investment strategy for Plan
assets is to achieve a mix of at least 95 percent of
investments for long-term growth and up to 5 percent for
near-term benefit payments with a wide diversification of asset
types, fund strategies, and fund managers. The target sector
allocations of Plan assets at December 31, 2010 are as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage of
|
|
|
|
Plan Assets at
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
Domestic Large/Mid-Cap Equity
|
|
|
17.9
|
%
|
Domestic Small Cap Equity
|
|
|
11.0
|
|
International Equity
|
|
|
11.9
|
|
Global Equity
|
|
|
7.3
|
|
Emerging Market Equity
|
|
|
6.9
|
|
Fixed Income Securities
|
|
|
44.0
|
|
Cash or Cash Equivalents
|
|
|
1.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
Plan Assets A reconciliation of beginning and
ending balances of the fair value of net assets associated with
the HSBC North America Pension Plan is shown below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
|
Fair value of net Plan assets at beginning of year
|
|
$
|
2,141
|
|
|
$
|
1,978
|
|
Cash contributions by HSBC North America
|
|
|
187
|
|
|
|
241
|
|
Actual return on Plan assets
|
|
|
397
|
|
|
|
129
|
|
Benefits paid
|
|
|
(161
|
)
|
|
|
(207
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of net Plan assets at end of year
|
|
$
|
2,564
|
|
|
$
|
2,141
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As a result of the capital markets improving since December
2009, as well as the $187 million contribution to the Plan
during 2010, the fair value of Plan assets at December 31,
2010 increased approximately 20 percent compared to 2009.
The Pension Protection Act of 2006 requires companies to meet
certain pension funding requirements by January 1, 2015. As
a result, during the third quarter of 2009, the Committee
revised the Pension Funding Policy to better reflect current
marketplace conditions and ensure the Plans ability to
continue to make lump some payments to retiring participants.
The revised Pension Funding Policy requires HSBC North America
to annually contribute the greater of:
|
|
|
|
|
The minimum contribution required under ERISA guidelines;
|
|
|
|
An amount necessary to ensure the ratio of the Plans
assets at the end of the year as compared to the Plans
accrued benefit obligation is equal to or greater than
90 percent;
|
|
|
|
Pension expense for the year as determined under current
accounting guidance; or
|
|
|
|
$100 million which approximates the actuarial present value
of benefits earned by Plan participants on an annual basis.
|
As a result, during 2010 HSBC North America made a contribution
to the Plan of $187 million. Additional contributions
during 2011 are anticipated.
Accounting principles related to fair value measurements provide
a framework for measuring fair value and focuses on an exit
price in the principal (or alternatively, the most advantageous)
market accessible in an orderly transaction between willing
market participants (the Fair Value Framework). The
Fair Value Framework establishes a three-
63
HSBC Finance Corporation
tiered fair value hierarchy with Level 1 representing
quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical
assets or liabilities. Fair values determined by Level 2
inputs are inputs that are observable for the identical asset or
liability, either directly or indirectly. Level 2 inputs
include quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in
active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar assets or
liabilities in markets that are inactive, and inputs other than
quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability,
such as interest rates and yield curves that are observable at
commonly quoted intervals. Level 3 inputs are unobservable
inputs for the asset or liability and include situations where
there is little, if any, market activity for the asset or
liability. Transfers between leveling categories are recognized
at the end of each reporting period.
The following table presents the fair values associated with the
major categories of Plan assets and indicates the fair value
hierarchy of the valuation techniques utilized to determine such
fair values as of December 31, 2010 and 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurement at December 31, 2010
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
(Level 1)
|
|
|
(Level 2)
|
|
|
(Level 3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
|
Investments at Fair Value:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and short term investments
|
|
$
|
128
|
|
|
$
|
128
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
Equity Securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Large-cap
Growth(1)
|
|
|
485
|
|
|
|
478
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
U.S. Small-cap
Growth(2)
|
|
|
295
|
|
|
|
215
|
|
|
|
80
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
International
Equity(3)
|
|
|
280
|
|
|
|
119
|
|
|
|
161
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Global Equity
|
|
|
203
|
|
|
|
84
|
|
|
|
119
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Emerging Market Equity
|
|
|
203
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
203
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
U.S. Treasury
|
|
|
519
|
|
|
|
519
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
U.S. Government agency issued or guaranteed
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Obligations of U.S. states and political subdivisions
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Asset-backed securities
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
U.S. corporate debt
securities(4)
|
|
|
287
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
287
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Corporate stocks preferred
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Foreign debt securities
|
|
|
116
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
99
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
Other Investments
|
|
|
59
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
59
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Accrued interest
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investments
|
|
|
2,693
|
|
|
|
1,557
|
|
|
|
1,091
|
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Receivables:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Receivables from sale of investments in process of settlement
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Derivative financial
asset(5)
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total receivables
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Assets
|
|
|
2,746
|
|
|
|
1,593
|
|
|
|
1,108
|
|
|
|
45
|
|
Liabilities
|
|
|
(182
|
)
|
|
|
(80
|
)
|
|
|
(102
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Net Assets
|
|
$
|
2,564
|
|
|
$
|
1,513
|
|
|
$
|
1,006
|
|
|
$
|
45
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
64
HSBC Finance Corporation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurement at December 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
(Level 1)
|
|
|
(Level 2)
|
|
|
(Level 3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
|
Investments at Fair Value:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and short term investments
|
|
$
|
78
|
|
|
$
|
78
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
Equity Securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
U.S. Large-cap
Growth(1)
|
|
|
518
|
|
|
|
510
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
U.S. Small-cap
Growth(2)
|
|
|
317
|
|
|
|
205
|
|
|
|
112
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
International
Equity(3)
|
|
|
287
|
|
|
|
158
|
|
|
|
129
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Global Equity
|
|
|
180
|
|
|
|
166
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Emerging Market Equity
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
U.S. Treasury
|
|
|
382
|
|
|
|
382
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
U.S. Government agency issued or guaranteed
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Obligations of U.S. states and political subdivisions
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
Asset-backed securities
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
U.S. corporate debt
securities(4)
|
|
|
274
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
273
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Corporate stocks preferred
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Foreign debt securities
|
|
|
96
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
95
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Accrued interest
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investments
|
|
|
2,276
|
|
|
|
1,508
|
|
|
|
747
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Receivables:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Receivables from sale of investments in process of settlement
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Derivative financial
asset(5)
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total receivables
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Assets
|
|
|
2,317
|
|
|
|
1,528
|
|
|
|
768
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
Liabilities
|
|
|
(176
|
)
|
|
|
(22
|
)
|
|
|
(154
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Net Assets
|
|
$
|
2,141
|
|
|
$
|
1,506
|
|
|
$
|
614
|
|
|
$
|
21
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
This category comprises actively managed enhanced index
investments that track the S&P 500 and actively managed
U.S. investments that track the Russell 1000.
|
|
(2)
|
This category comprises actively managed U.S. investments that
track the Russell 2000.
|
|
(3)
|
This category comprises actively managed equity investments in
non-U.S. and
Canada developed markets that generally track the MSCI EAFE
index. MSCI EAFE is an equity market index of 22 developed
market countries in Europe, Australia, Asia and the Far East
including Australia, Austria, Belgium, Denmark, Finland, France,
Germany, Greece, Hong Kong, Ireland, Israel, Italy, Japan, the
Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Portugal, Singapore, Spain,
Sweden, Switzerland, and the United Kingdom.
|
|
(4)
|
This category represents predominantly investment grade bonds of
U.S. issuers from diverse industries.
|
|
(5)
|
This category is comprised completely of interest rate swaps.
|
The following table provides additional detail regarding the
rating of our U.S. corporate debt securities at
December 31, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Level 2
|
|
|
Level 3
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
|
AAA to
AA(1)
|
|
$
|
23
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
23
|
|
A+ to
A-(1)
|
|
|
106
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
106
|
|
BBB+ to
Unrated(1)
|
|
|
158
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
158
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
287
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
287
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
We obtain ratings on our U.S. corporate debt securities from
both Moodys Investor Services and Standard and Poors
Corporation. In the event the ratings we obtain from these
agencies differ, we utilize the lower of the two ratings.
|
65
HSBC Finance Corporation
Significant Transfers Between Level 1 and
Level 2 There were no significant transfers
between Levels 1 and 2 during 2010.
Information on Level 3 Assets and
Liabilities The following table summarizes additional
information about changes in the fair value of Level 3
assets during 2010 and 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Gains and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Losses)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Period
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Included in
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Plan
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transfers
|
|
|
Transfers
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
|
Jan 1,
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comp.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Into
|
|
|
Out of
|
|
|
Dec. 31,
|
|
|
Gains
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Income
|
|
|
Income
|
|
|
Purchases
|
|
|
Settlement
|
|
|
Level 3
|
|
|
Level 3
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
(Losses)
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
|
Obligations of U.S. states and political subdivisions
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
(2
|
)
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
Asset-backed securities
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
Foreign debt securities
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
21
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
|
$
|
16
|
|
|
$
|
(1
|
)
|
|
$
|
9
|
|
|
$
|
(2
|
)
|
|
$
|
45
|
|
|
$
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Gains and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Losses)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Period
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Included in
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Plan
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transfers
|
|
|
Transfers
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
|
Jan 1,
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comp.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Into
|
|
|
Out of
|
|
|
Dec. 31,
|
|
|
Gains
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Income
|
|
|
Income
|
|
|
Purchases
|
|
|
Settlement
|
|
|
Level 3
|
|
|
Level 3
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
(Losses)
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
|
International equity
|
|
$
|
12
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
(2
|
)
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
(10
|
)
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
Global equity
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(15
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
U.S. Treasury
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
U.S. governmental agency issued or guaranteed
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Obligations of U.S. states and political subdivisions
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Asset-backed securities
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
U.S. corporate debt securities
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Foreign debt securities
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
67
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
9
|
|
|
$
|
(18
|
)
|
|
$
|
8
|
|
|
$
|
(46
|
)
|
|
$
|
21
|
|
|
$
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Valuation Techniques for Plan Assets Following is a
description of valuation methodologies used for significant
categories of Plan assets recorded at fair value.
Securities: Fair value of securities is generally
determined by a third party valuation source. The pricing
services generally source fair value measurements from quoted
market prices and if not available, the security is valued based
on quotes from similar securities using broker quotes and other
information obtained from dealers and market participants. For
securities which do not trade in active markets, such as fixed
income securities, the pricing services generally utilize
various pricing applications, including models, to measure fair
value. The pricing applications are based on market convention
and use inputs that are derived principally from or corroborated
by observable market data by correlation or other means. The
following summarizes the valuation methodology used for the
major security types of our pension plan assets:
|
|
|
|
|
Equity securities Since most of our securities are
transacted in active markets, fair value measurements are
determined based on quoted prices for the identical security.
Equity securities and derivative contracts that
|
66
HSBC Finance Corporation
|
|
|
|
|
are non-exchange traded are primarily investments in common
stock funds. The funds permit investors to redeem the ownership
interests back to the issuer at
end-of-day
for the net asset value (NAV) per share and there
are no significant redemption restrictions. Thus the
end-of-day
NAV is considered observable.
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury, U.S. government agency issued or
guaranteed and Obligations of U.S. States and political
subdivisions As these securities transact in an
active market, the pricing services source fair value
measurements from quoted prices for the identical security or
quoted prices for similar securities with adjustments as
necessary made using observable inputs which are market
corroborated.
|
|
|
|
U.S. government sponsored enterprises For
certain government sponsored mortgage-backed securities which
transact in an active market, the pricing services source fair
value measurements from quoted prices for the identical security
or quoted prices for similar securities with adjustments as
necessary made using observable inputs which are market
corroborated. For government sponsored mortgage-backed
securities which do not transact in an active market, fair value
is determined using discounted cash flow models and inputs
related to interest rates, prepayment speeds, loss curves and
market discount rates that would be required by investors in the
current market given the specific characteristics and inherent
credit risk of the underlying collateral.
|
|
|
|
Asset-backed securities Fair value is determined
using discounted cash flow models and inputs related to interest
rates, prepayment speeds, loss curves and market discount rates
that would be required by investors in the current market given
the specific characteristics and inherent credit risk of the
underlying collateral.
|
|
|
|
U.S. corporate and foreign debt securities For
non-callable corporate securities, a credit spread scale is
created for each issuer. These spreads are then added to the
equivalent maturity U.S. Treasury yield to determine
current pricing. Credit spreads are obtained from the new issue
market, secondary trading levels and dealer quotes. For
securities with early redemption features, an option adjusted
spread (OAS) model is incorporated to adjust the
spreads determined above. Additionally, the pricing services
will survey the broker/dealer community to obtain relevant trade
data including benchmark quotes and updated spreads.
|
|
|
|
Corporate stocks preferred In general,
fair value for preferred securities is calculated using an
appropriate spread over a comparable U.S. Treasury security
for each issue. These spreads represent the additional yield
required to account for risk including credit, refunding and
liquidity. The inputs are derived principally from or
corroborated by observable market data.
|
|
|
|
Derivatives Derivatives are recorded at fair value.
Asset and liability positions in individual derivatives that are
covered by legally enforceable master netting agreements,
including cash collateral are offset and presented net in
accordance accounting principles which allow the offsetting of
amounts relating to certain contracts. Derivatives traded on an
exchange are valued using quoted prices. OTC derivatives, which
comprise a majority of derivative contract positions, are valued
using valuation techniques. The fair value for the majority of
our derivative instruments are determined based on internally
developed models that utilize independently-sourced market
parameters, including interest rate yield curves, option
volatilities, and currency rates. For complex or long-dated
derivative products where market data is not available, fair
value may be affected by the choice of valuation model and the
underlying assumptions about, among other things, the timing of
cash flows and credit spreads. The fair values of certain
structured derivative products are sensitive to unobservable
inputs such as default correlations and volatilities. These
estimates are susceptible to significant change in future
periods as market conditions change.
|
67
HSBC Finance Corporation
Projected Benefit Obligation A reconciliation of
beginning and ending balances of the projected benefit
obligation of the defined benefit pension plan is shown below
and reflects the projected benefit obligation of the merged HSBC
North American plan.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
|
Projected benefit obligation at beginning of year
|
|
$
|
3,113
|
|
|
$
|
3,018
|
|
Service cost
|
|
|
76
|
|
|
|
83
|
|
Interest cost
|
|
|
174
|
|
|
|
182
|
|
Gain on curtailment
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(24
|
)
|
Actuarial losses
|
|
|
326
|
|
|
|
43
|
|
Special termination benefits
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
Plan
amendment(1)
|
|
|
(144
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
Benefits paid
|
|
|
(161
|
)
|
|
|
(207
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Projected benefit obligation at end of year
|
|
$
|
3,384
|
|
|
$
|
3,113
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
The Plan amendment relates to the approval in the first quarter
of 2010 to cease all future benefit accruals for legacy
participants under the final average pay formula as previously
discussed.
|
The accumulated benefit obligation for the HSBC North America
Pension Plan was $3.4 billion and $2.9 billion at
December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. As the projected
benefit obligation and the accumulated benefit obligation relate
to the HSBC North America Pension Plan, only a portion of this
deficit should be considered our responsibility.
The curtailment gain recognized in 2009 resulted from our
decision to discontinue new customer account originations by our
Consumer Lending business and to close the Consumer Lending
branch offices.
The assumptions used in determining the projected benefit
obligation of the HSBC North America Pension Plan at December 31
are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Discount rate
|
|
|
5.45
|
%
|
|
|
5.95
|
%
|
|
|
6.05
|
%
|
Salary increase assumption
|
|
|
2.75
|
|
|
|
3.50
|
|
|
|
3.50
|
|
Estimated future benefit payments for the HSBC North America
Pension Plan are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
HSBC
|
|
|
North America
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
2011
|
|
$
|
167
|
|
2012
|
|
|
175
|
|
2013
|
|
|
182
|
|
2014
|
|
|
189
|
|
2015
|
|
|
195
|
|
2016-2020
|
|
|
1,053
|
|
Supplemental Retirement Plan We also offer a
non-qualified supplemental retirement plan. This plan, which is
currently unfunded, provides eligible employees defined pension
benefits outside the qualified retirement plan. Benefits are
based on average earnings, years of service and age at
retirement. The projected benefit obligation was
$81 million and 79 million at December 31, 2010
and 2009, respectively. Pension expense related to the
supplemental retirement plan was $12 million in 2010,
$10 million in 2009 and $25 million in 2008.
68
HSBC Finance Corporation
Foreign Defined Benefit Pension Plans Prior
to the sale of our U.K. and Canadian operations, we sponsored
defined benefit pension plans for our foreign based employees.
Pension expense for our foreign operations was $3 million
in 2008 and is reflected as a component of Loss from
discontinued operations in our consolidated statement of
income (loss). These plans were transferred as part of the sale
of our U.K. and Canadian operations.
Defined Contribution Plans We participate in
the HSBC North America 401(k) savings plan and profit sharing
plan which exist for employees meeting certain eligibility
requirements. Under these plans, each participants
contribution is matched up to a maximum of 6 percent of the
participants compensation. Contributions are in the form
of cash. Total expense for these plans for HSBC Finance
Corporation was $17 million in 2010, $32 million in
2009 and $52 million in 2008.
Postretirement Plans Other Than Pensions Our
employees also participate in plans which provide medical,
dental and life insurance benefits to retirees and eligible
dependents. These plans cover substantially all employees who
meet certain age and vested service requirements. We have
instituted dollar limits on our payments under the plans to
control the cost of future medical benefits.
The net postretirement benefit cost included the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
|
Service cost benefits earned during the period
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
Interest cost
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
Gain on curtailment
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(16
|
)
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
Recognized gains
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net periodic postretirement benefit cost (income)
|
|
$
|
11
|
|
|
$
|
(6
|
)
|
|
$
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During 2009, we recorded a curtailment gain of $16 million
due to a reduction in the benefits to be provided by the
postretirement benefit plan as a result of the decision to
discontinue new customer account originations by our Consumer
Lending business and to close the Consumer Lending branch
offices.
The assumptions used in determining the net periodic
postretirement benefit cost for our postretirement benefit plans
are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Discount rate
|
|
|
5.20
|
%
|
|
|
7.15
|
%
|
|
|
5.90
|
%
|
Salary increase assumption
|
|
|
2.90
|
|
|
|
3.50
|
|
|
|
3.75
|
|
A reconciliation of the beginning and ending balances of the
accumulated postretirement benefit obligation is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
|
Accumulated benefit obligation at beginning of year
|
|
$
|
189
|
|
|
$
|
207
|
|
Service cost
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
Interest cost
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
Transferred to HSBC Technology and Services (USA) Inc.
(HTSU)(1)
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
Actuarial losses
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
Gain on curtailment
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(16
|
)
|
Benefits paid, net
|
|
|
(15
|
)
|
|
|
(14
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated benefit obligation at end of year
|
|
$
|
184
|
|
|
$
|
189
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Reflects the impact of the transfer of certain support functions
to HTSU. See Note 23, Related Party
Transactions, for additional information on the
centralization of support functions within HTSU.
|
69
HSBC Finance Corporation
Our postretirement benefit plans are funded on a pay-as-you-go
basis. We currently estimate that we will pay benefits of
approximately $16 million relating to our postretirement
benefit plans in 2011. The funded status of our postretirement
benefit plans was a liability of $184 million and
$189 million at December 31, 2010 and 2009,
respectively.
Estimated future benefit payments for our postretirement benefit
plans are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
$
|
16
|
|
2012
|
|
|
16
|
|
2013
|
|
|
16
|
|
2014
|
|
|
16
|
|
2015
|
|
|
16
|
|
2016-2020
|
|
|
71
|
|
The assumptions used in determining the benefit obligation of
our postretirement benefit plans at December 31 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Discount rate
|
|
|
4.95
|
%
|
|
|
5.60
|
%
|
|
|
6.05
|
%
|
Salary increase assumption
|
|
|
2.75
|
|
|
|
3.50
|
|
|
|
3.50
|
|
A 7.7 percent annual rate of increase in the gross cost of
covered health care benefits for participants under the age of
65 and a 7.2 percent annual rate for participants over the
age of 65 was assumed for 2010. This rate of increase is assumed
to decline gradually to 4.50 percent in 2027.
Assumed health care cost trend rates have an effect on the
amounts reported for health care plans. A one-percentage point
change in assumed health care cost trend rates would increase
(decrease) service and interest costs and the postretirement
benefit obligation as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One Percent
|
|
One Percent
|
|
|
Increase
|
|
Decrease
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
Effect on total of service and interest cost components
|
|
$
|
.1
|
|
|
$
|
(.1
|
)
|
Effect on postretirement benefit obligation
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
70
HSBC Finance Corporation
23. Related
Party Transactions
In the normal course of business, we conduct transactions with
HSBC and its subsidiaries. These transactions occur at
prevailing market rates and terms and include funding
arrangements, derivative execution, purchases and sales of
receivables, servicing arrangements, information technology and
some centralized support services, item and statement processing
services, banking and other miscellaneous services. The
following tables present related party balances and the income
and (expense) generated by related party transactions for
continuing operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31,
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
|
Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
$
|
168
|
|
|
$
|
273
|
|
Interest bearing deposits with banks
|
|
|
1,009
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
Securities purchased under agreements to resell
|
|
|
2,060
|
|
|
|
1,550
|
|
Derivative related assets
|
|
|
64
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
126
|
|
|
|
123
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
3,427
|
|
|
$
|
1,951
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Due to affiliates (includes $436 million at
December 31, 2010 carried at fair value)
|
|
$
|
8,255
|
|
|
$
|
9,043
|
|
Derivative related liability
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
56
|
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
70
|
|
|
|
186
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
$
|
8,327
|
|
|
$
|
9,285
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
71
HSBC Finance Corporation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
Income/(Expense):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income from HSBC affiliates
|
|
$
|
7
|
|
|
$
|
7
|
|
|
$
|
33
|
|
Interest expense paid to HSBC
affiliates(1)
|
|
|
(764
|
)
|
|
|
(1,103
|
)
|
|
|
(1,024
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Interest income (loss)
|
|
|
(757
|
)
|
|
|
(1,096
|
)
|
|
|
(991
|
)
|
Net gain on bulk sale of receivables to HSBC Bank USA
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Gain/(loss) on FVO debt with affiliate
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Dividend income from affiliate preferred stock
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
HSBC affiliate income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on receivable sales to HSBC affiliates:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Daily sales of private label receivable originations
|
|
|
197
|
|
|
|
90
|
|
|
|
115
|
|
Daily sales of credit card receivables
|
|
|
343
|
|
|
|
377
|
|
|
|
142
|
|
Sales of real estate secured receivables
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total gain on receivable sales to HSBC affiliates
|
|
|
540
|
|
|
|
469
|
|
|
|
260
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain (Loss) on sale of other assets to HSBC affiliates
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Loss on sale of affiliate preferred stock
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
Servicing and other fees from HSBC affiliates:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
HSBC Bank USA:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate secured servicing and related fees
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
Private label and card receivable servicing and related fees
|
|
|
625
|
|
|
|
635
|
|
|
|
436
|
|
Other servicing, processing, origination and support revenues
from HSBC Bank USA and other HSBC affiliates
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
|
40
|
|
HSBC Technology and Services (USA) Inc. (HTSU)
administrative fees and rental
revenue(2)
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
59
|
|
|
|
63
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total servicing and other fees from HSBC affiliates
|
|
|
666
|
|
|
|
748
|
|
|
|
545
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Support services from HSBC affiliates
|
|
|
(1,092
|
)
|
|
|
(925
|
)
|
|
|
(922
|
)
|
Stock based compensation expense with HSBC
|
|
|
(14
|
)
|
|
|
(29
|
)
|
|
|
(36
|
)
|
Insurance commission paid to HSBC Bank Canada
|
|
|
(33
|
)
|
|
|
(18
|
)
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
(1)
|
Includes interest expense paid to HSBC affiliates for debt held
by HSBC affiliates as well as net interest paid to or received
from HSBC affiliates on risk management positions related to
non-affiliated debt.
|
|
(2)
|
During 2010, changes were made in the methodology used to
allocate rental expense between us and HTSU. Rental revenue from
HTSU totaled $3 million during 2010, $47 million
during 2009 and 2008, respectively.
|
Transactions
with HSBC Bank USA:
|
|
|
In January 2009, we sold our GM and UP Portfolios to HSBC Bank
USA with an outstanding principal balance of $12.4 billion
at the time of sale and recorded a gain on the bulk sale of
these receivables of $130 million. This gain was partially
offset by a loss of $80 million recorded on the termination
of cash flow hedges associated with the $6.1 billion of
indebtedness transferred to HSBC Bank USA as part of these
transactions. We retained the customer account relationships and
by agreement sell on a daily basis all new credit card
receivable originations for the GM and UP Portfolios to HSBC
Bank USA. We continue to service the GM and UP receivables for
HSBC Bank USA for a fee. Information regarding these receivables
is summarized in the table below.
|
|
|
In July 2004 we purchased the account relationships associated
with $970 million of credit card receivables from HSBC Bank
USA and on a daily basis, we sell new receivable originations on
these credit card accounts to HSBC
|
72
HSBC Finance Corporation
|
|
|
Bank USA. We continue to service these loans for a fee.
Information regarding these receivables is summarized in the
table below.
|
|
|
|
In December 2004, we sold to HSBC Bank USA our private label
receivable portfolio (excluding retail sales contracts at our
Consumer Lending business). We continue to service the sold
private label and credit card receivables and receive servicing
and related fee income from HSBC Bank USA. We retained the
customer account relationships and by agreement sell on a daily
basis all new private label receivable originations and new
receivable originations on these credit card accounts to HSBC
Bank USA. Information regarding these receivables is summarized
in the table below.
|
|
|
In 2003 and 2004, we sold approximately $3.7 billion of
real estate secured receivables to HSBC Bank USA. We continue to
service these receivables for a fee. Information regarding these
receivables is summarized in the table below.
|
The following table summarizes the private label, credit card
(including the GM and UP Portfolios) and real estate secured
receivables we are servicing for HSBC Bank USA at
December 31, 2010 and 2009 as well as the receivables sold
on a daily basis during 2010, 2009 and 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credit Cards
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Private
|
|
General
|
|
Union
|
|
|
|
Real Estate
|
|
|
|
|
Label
|
|
Motors
|
|
Privilege
|
|
Other
|
|
Secured
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(in billions)
|
|
Receivables serviced for HSBC Bank USA:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2010
|
|
$
|
13.5
|
|
|
$
|
4.5
|
|
|
$
|
4.1
|
|
|
$
|
2.0
|
|
|
$
|
1.5
|
|
|
$
|
25.6
|
|
December 31, 2009
|
|
|
15.6
|
|
|
|
5.4
|
|
|
|
5.3
|
|
|
|
2.1
|
|
|
|
1.8
|
|
|
|
30.2
|
|
Total of receivables sold on a daily basis to HSBC Bank USA
during:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
$
|
14.6
|
|
|
$
|
13.5
|
|
|
$
|
3.2
|
|
|
$
|
4.1
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
35.4
|
|
2009
|
|
|
15.7
|
|
|
|
14.5
|
|
|
|
3.5
|
|
|
|
4.3
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
38.0
|
|
2008
|
|
|
19.6
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
4.8
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
24.4
|
|
Fees received for servicing these loan portfolios totaled
$630 million, $641 million and $442 million
during 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
The GM and UP credit card receivables as well as the private
label receivables are sold to HSBC Bank USA on a daily basis at
a sales price for each type of portfolio determined using a fair
value calculated semi-annually in April and October by an
independent third party based on the projected future cash flows
of the receivables. The projected future cash flows are
developed using various assumptions reflecting the historical
performance of the receivables and adjusted for key factors such
as the anticipated economic and regulatory environment. The
independent third party uses these projected future cash flows
and a discount rate to determine a range of fair values. We use
the mid-point of this range as the sales price.
|
|
|
In the second quarter of 2008, our Consumer Lending business
launched a new program with HSBC Bank USA to sell real estate
secured receivables to the Federal Home Loan Mortgage
Corporation (Freddie Mac). Our Consumer Lending
business originated the loans in accordance with Freddie
Macs underwriting criteria. The loans were then sold to
HSBC Bank USA, generally within 30 days. HSBC Bank USA
repackaged the loans and sold them to Freddie Mac under their
existing Freddie Mac program. During the three months ended
March 31, 2009, we sold $51 million of real estate
secured loans to HSBC Bank USA for a gain on sale of
$2 million. This program was discontinued in late February
2009 as a result of our decision to discontinue new customer
account originations in our Consumer Lending business.
|
|
|
HSBC Bank USA serviced a portfolio of real estate secured
receivables for us with an outstanding principal balance of
$1.5 billion at December 31, 2009. During 2010,
servicing of these receivables was transferred back to us. Fees
paid relating to the servicing of this portfolio totaled
$1 million during 2010 prior to the transfer of servicing
to us compared to $6 million and $12 million during
2009 and 2008, respectively. These fees are
|
73
HSBC Finance Corporation
|
|
|
reported in Support services from HSBC affiliates. The decrease
during 2010 reflects a renegotiation of servicing fees for this
portfolio.
|
|
|
|
In the third quarter of 2009, we sold $86 million of Low
Income Housing Tax Credit Investment Funds to HSBC Bank USA for
a loss on sale of $15 million (after-tax).
|
|
|
Under multiple service level agreements, we also provide various
services to HSBC Bank USA, including real estate and credit card
servicing and processing activities and other operational and
administrative support. Fees received for these services are
reported as Servicing and other fees from HSBC affiliates. Fees
received for auto finance loan servicing are included as a
component of Loss from discontinued Auto operations.
|
|
|
In the fourth quarter of 2009, an initiative was begun to
streamline the servicing of real estate secured receivables
across North America. As a result, certain functions that we had
previously performed for our mortgage customers are now being
performed by HSBC Bank USA for all North America mortgage
customers, including our mortgage customers. Additionally, we
are currently performing certain functions for all North America
mortgage customers where these functions had been previously
provided separately by each entity. During 2010 and 2009, we
paid $8 million and $5 million for services we
received from HSBC Bank USA and received $7 million and
$1 million for services we provided.
|
|
|
In July 2010, we transferred certain employees in our real
estate secured receivable servicing department to a subsidiary
of HSBC Bank USA. These employees continue to service our real
estate secured receivable portfolio and we pay a fee to HSBC
Bank USA for these services.
|
|
|
We have extended revolving lines of credit to subsidiaries of
HSBC Bank USA for an aggregate total of $1.0 billion. No
balances were outstanding under any of these lines of credit at
either December 31, 2010 or 2009.
|
|
|
HSBC Bank USA extended a secured $1.5 billion uncommitted
credit facility to certain of our subsidiaries in December 2008.
This is a 364 day credit facility which was renewed in
November 2010. There were no balances outstanding at
December 31, 2010 or 2009.
|
|
|
HSBC Bank USA extended a $1.0 billion committed unsecured
credit facility to HSBC Bank Nevada (HOBN), a
subsidiary of HSBC Finance Corporation, in December 2008. This
364 day credit facility was renewed in December 2010. There
were no balances outstanding at December 31, 2010 or 2009.
|
|
|
As it relates to our TFS operations, which terminated in the
fourth quarter of 2010, HSBC Bank USA and HSBC
Trust Company (Delaware) (HTCD) originated the
loans on behalf of our TFS business for clients of a single
third party tax preparer. We historically purchased the loans
originated by HSBC Bank USA and HTCD daily for a fee. During the
first quarter of 2010, we began purchasing a smaller portion of
these loans. The loans which we previously purchased were
retained by HSBC Bank USAs balance sheet. In the event any
of the loans which HSBC Bank USA continued to hold on its
balance sheet reached a defined delinquency status, we purchased
the delinquent loans at par value as we assumed all credit risk
associated with this program. We received a fee from HSBC Bank
USA for both servicing the loans and assuming the credit risk
associated with these loans which totaled $58 million
during 2010 and is included as a component of loss from
discontinued operations. For the loans which we continued to
purchase from HTCD, we received taxpayer financial services
revenue and paid an origination fee to HTCD. Fees paid for
originations totaled $4 million in 2010, $11 million
in 2009 and $13 million in 2008 and are included as a
component of loss from discontinued operations.
|
|
|
As it relates to our discontinued auto finance operations, in
January 2009, we sold certain auto finance receivables with an
outstanding principal balance of $3.0 billion at the time
of sale to HSBC Bank USA and recorded a gain on the bulk sale of
these receivables of $7 million which is included as a
component of Loss from discontinued auto operations for 2009. In
March 2010, we repurchased $379 million of these auto
finance receivables from HSBC Bank USA and immediately sold them
to SC USA. Prior to the sale of our receivable servicing
operations to SC USA in March 2010, we serviced these auto
finance receivables for HSBC Bank USA for a fee, which is
included as a component of Loss from discontinued auto
operations. In August 2010, we sold the remainder of our auto
finance receivable portfolio to SC USA.
|
74
HSBC Finance Corporation
Transactions
with HSBC Holdings plc:
|
|
|
A commercial paper back-stop credit facility of
$2.0 billion and $2.5 billion from HSBC at
December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively, supported our
domestic issuances of commercial paper. No balances were
outstanding under this credit facility at December 31, 2010
or 2009. The annual commitment fee requirement to support
availability of this line is included as a component of Interest
expense HSBC affiliates in the consolidated
statement of income (loss).
|
|
|
During the second quarter of 2009, we sold to HSBC
$248 million of affiliate preferred stock which we had
received on the sale of our U.K. credit card business. As a
result, we recorded a loss on sale of $6 million which is
included as a component of other income during 2009.
|
|
|
In late February 2009, we effectively converted
$275 million of mandatorily redeemable preferred securities
of the Household Capital Trust VIII which had been issued
during 2003 to common stock by redeeming the junior subordinated
notes underlying the preferred securities and then issuing
common stock to HSBC Investments (North America) Inc.
(HINO). Interest expense recorded on the underlying
junior subordinated notes totaled $3 million in 2009 and
$18 million in 2008. This interest expense is included in
Interest expense HSBC affiliates in the consolidated
statement of income (loss).
|
|
|
Employees of HSBC Finance Corporation participate in one or more
stock compensation plans sponsored by HSBC. These expenses are
recorded in Salary and employee benefits and are reflected in
the above table as Stock based compensation expense with HSBC.
As of December 31, 2010, our share of future compensation
cost related to grants which have not yet fully vested is
approximately $9 million. This amount is expected to be
recognized over a weighted-average period of 0.94 years.
|
Transactions
with other HSBC affiliates:
|
|
|
HSBC North Americas technology and certain centralized
support services including human resources, corporate affairs,
risk management and other shared services and beginning in
January 2010, legal, compliance, tax and finance are centralized
within HTSU. Technology related assets are generally capitalized
and recorded on our consolidated balance sheet. HTSU also
provides certain item processing and statement processing
activities to us. The fees we pay HTSU for the centralized
support services and processing activities are included in
support services from HSBC affiliates. We also receive fees from
HTSU for providing them certain administrative services, such as
internal audit, as well as receiving rental revenue from HTSU
for certain office space. The fees and rental revenue we receive
from HTSU are recorded as a component of servicing and other
fees from HSBC affiliates.
|
|
|
We use HSBC Global Resourcing (UK) Ltd., an HSBC affiliate
located outside of the United States, to provide various support
services to our operations including among other areas, customer
service, systems, collection and accounting functions. The
expenses related to these services of $125 million in 2010,
$161 million in 2009 and $159 million in 2008 are
included as a component of Support services from HSBC affiliates
in the table above. Beginning in 2010, the expenses for these
services for all HSBC North America operations are billed
directly to HTSU who is providing oversight and review of the
majority of all of our intercompany transactions and then bills
these services to the appropriate HSBC affiliate who benefited
from the services.
|
|
|
During the fourth quarter of 2008, we sold miscellaneous assets
to HTSU for a purchase price equal to the book value of these
assets of $41 million.
|
|
|
The notional value of derivative contracts outstanding with HSBC
subsidiaries totaled $49.9 billion and $58.6 billion
at December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. When the fair
value of our agreements with affiliate counterparties requires
the posting of collateral, it is provided in either the form of
cash and recorded on the balance sheet or in the form of
securities which are not recorded on our balance sheet. The fair
value of our agreements with affiliate counterparties required
the affiliate to provide collateral of $2.5 billion and
$3.4 billion at December 31, 2010 and 2009,
respectively, all of which was received in cash. These amounts
are offset against
|
75
HSBC Finance Corporation
|
|
|
the fair value amount recognized for derivative instruments that
have been offset under the same master netting arrangement.
|
|
|
|
Due to affiliates includes amounts owed to subsidiaries of HSBC
as a result of direct debt issuances. At December 31, 2010,
due to affiliates includes $436 million carried at fair
value under FVO reporting. During 2010, loss on debt designated
at fair value and related derivatives includes $4 million
related to these debt issuances.
|
|
|
During 2010, we executed a $1.0 billion
364-day
uncommitted revolving credit agreement with HSBC North America
which allowed for borrowings with maturities of up to
15 years, and borrowed the full amount available under this
agreement during 2010. During the fourth quarter of 2010, we
replaced this loan to HSBC North America with the issuance of
1,000 shares of Series C preferred stock to HINO for
$1.0 billion. See Note 19, Redeemable Preferred
Stock, for further discussion of the Series C
preferred stock.
|
|
|
In December 2010, we made a deposit totaling $1.0 billion
with HSBC Bank plc (HBEU) at current market rates.
The deposit can be withdrawn anytime after June 3, 2011
with 185 days notice, and matures on March 1, 2012.
Interest income earned on this deposit, which was immaterial
during 2010, is included in interest income from HSBC affiliates
in the table above.
|
|
|
In September 2008, we borrowed $1.0 billion from an
existing uncommitted credit facility with HBEU. The borrowing
was for 60 days and matured in November 2008. We renewed
this borrowing for an additional 95 days. The borrowing
matured in February 2009 and we chose not to renew it at that
time. Interest expense on this borrowing totaled $5 million
in 2009 and $11 million in 2008.
|
|
|
In October 2008, we borrowed $1.2 billion from an
uncommitted money market facility with a subsidiary of HSBC Asia
Pacific (HBAP). The borrowing was for six months,
matured in April 2009 and we chose not to renew it at that time.
Interest expense on this borrowing totaled $19 million in
2009 and $16 million in 2008.
|
|
|
We purchase from HSBC Securities (USA) Inc. (HSI)
securities under an agreement to resell. Interest income
recognized on these securities totaled $6 million in 2010,
$5 million in 2009 and $16 million in 2008 and is
reflected as Interest income from HSBC affiliates in the table
above.
|
|
|
Support services from HSBC affiliates also includes banking
services and other miscellaneous services provided by other
subsidiaries of HSBC, including HSBC Bank USA.
|
|
|
Domestic employees of HSBC Finance Corporation participate in a
defined benefit pension plan and other post-retirement benefit
plans sponsored by HSBC North America. See Note 22,
Pension and Other Post-retirement Benefits, for
additional information on this pension plan.
|
|
|
We have utilized HSBC Markets (USA) Inc, (HMUS) to
lead manage the underwriting of a majority of our ongoing debt
issuances as well as manage the debt exchange which occurred
during 2010. During 2010, fees paid to HMUS for such services
totaled $13 million. There were no fees paid to HMUS for
such services during 2009 or 2008. For debt not accounted for
under the fair value option, these fees are amortized over the
life of the related debt and included as a component of interest
expense.
|
|
|
As previously discussed in Note 3, Discontinued
Operations, in May 2008 we sold all of the common stock of
the holding company of our U.K. Operations to HOHU for GBP
181 million (equivalent to approximately
$359 million). The results of operations for our U.K.
Operations have been reclassified as income from discontinued
operations for all periods presented.
|
|
|
As previously discussed in Note 3, Discontinued
Operations, in November 2008 we sold all of the common
stock of the holding company of our Canadian Operations to HSBC
Bank Canada for approximately $279 million (based on the
exchange rate on the date of sale). While HSBC Bank Canada
assumed the liabilities of our Canadian Operations as a result
of this transaction, we continue to guarantee the external
long-term and medium-term notes issued by our Canadian business
prior to the sale for a fee. We recorded $5 million in
2010, $6 million in 2009 and $10 million in 2008 for
providing this guarantee. As of December 31, 2010, the
outstanding balance of the guaranteed notes was
$1.5 billion and the latest scheduled maturity of the notes
is May 2012. The sale
|
76
HSBC Finance Corporation
|
|
|
agreement with HSBC Bank Canada allows us to continue to
distribute various insurance products through the branch network
for a fee. Fees paid to HSBC Bank Canada for distributing
insurance products through this network totaled $33 million
in 2010, $18 million in 2009 and $7 million in 2008
and are included in Insurance Commission paid to HSBC Bank
Canada. The results of operations for our Canadian Operations
have been reclassified as Income from discontinued operations
for all periods presented.
|
24. Business
Segments
We have two reportable segments: Card and Retail Services and
Consumer. Our segments are managed separately and are
characterized by different middle-market consumer lending
products, origination processes, and locations. Our segment
results are reported on a continuing operations basis.
Our Card and Retail Services segment includes our MasterCard,
Visa, private label and other credit card operations. The Card
and Retail Services segment offers these products throughout the
United States primarily via strategic affinity and co-branding
relationships, merchant relationships and direct mail. We also
offer products and provide customer service through the
Internet. The private label receivables, along with the GM and
UP receivables are sold daily to HSBC Bank USA which we continue
to service for a fee.
Our Consumer segment consists of our run-off Consumer Lending
and Mortgage Services businesses. The Consumer segment provided
real estate secured and personal non-credit card loans with both
revolving and closed-end terms and with fixed or variable
interest rates. Loans were originated through branch locations
and direct mail. Products were also offered and customers
serviced through the Internet. Prior to the first quarter of
2007, we acquired loans from correspondent lenders and prior to
September 2007 we also originated loans sourced through mortgage
brokers. While these businesses are operating in run-off mode,
they have not been reported as discontinued operations because
we continue to generate cash flow from the ongoing collections
of the receivables, including interest and fees.
The All Other caption includes our Insurance and Commercial
business. Each of these businesses falls below the quantitative
threshold tests under segment reporting accounting principles
for determining reportable segments. The All Other
caption also includes our corporate and treasury activities,
which includes the impact of FVO debt. Certain fair value
adjustments related to purchase accounting resulting from our
acquisition by HSBC and related amortization have been allocated
to corporate, which is included in the All Other
caption within our segment disclosure including goodwill arising
from our acquisition by HSBC.
As discussed in Note 3, Discontinued
Operations, our Auto Finance business, which was
previously reported in our Consumer segment, and our TFS
business which was previously included in the All
Other caption, are now reported as discontinued operations
and are no longer included in our segment presentation.
We report results to our parent, HSBC, in accordance with its
reporting basis, International Financial Reporting Standards
(IFRSs). Our segment results are presented on an
IFRSs legal entity basis (IFRS Basis) (a
non-U.S. GAAP
financial measure) as operating results are monitored and
reviewed and trends are evaluated on an IFRS Basis. However, we
continue to monitor capital adequacy, establish dividend policy
and report to regulatory agencies on a U.S. GAAP basis.
For segment reporting purposes, intersegment transactions have
not been eliminated. We generally account for transactions
between segments as if they were with third parties.
A summary of the significant differences between U.S. GAAP
and IFRSs as they impact our results are summarized below:
Net
Interest Income
Effective interest rate The calculation of
effective interest rates under IAS 39, Financial
Instruments: Recognition and Measurement (IAS 39),
requires an estimate of all fees and points paid or
recovered between parties to the contract that are an
integral part of the effective interest rate be included.
U.S. GAAP
77
HSBC Finance Corporation
generally prohibits recognition of interest income to the extent
the net investment in the loan would increase to an amount
greater than the amount at which the borrower could settle the
obligation. Under U.S. GAAP, prepayment penalties are
generally recognized as received. U.S. GAAP also includes
interest income on loans originated as held for sale which is
included in other revenues for IFRSs.
Deferred loan origination costs and fees Loan
origination cost deferrals under IFRSs are more stringent and
result in lower costs being deferred than permitted under
U.S. GAAP. In addition, all deferred loan origination fees,
costs and loan premiums must be recognized based on the expected
life of the receivables under IFRSs as part of the effective
interest calculation while under U.S. GAAP they may be
recognized on either a contractual or expected life basis.
Net interest income Under IFRSs, net interest
income includes the interest element for derivatives which
correspond to debt designated at fair value. For U.S. GAAP,
this is included in Gain (loss) on debt designated at fair value
and related derivatives which is a component of other revenues.
Additionally, under IFRSs, insurance investment income is
included in net interest income instead of as a component of
other revenues under U.S. GAAP.
Other
Operating Income (Total Other Revenues)
Present value of long-term insurance
contracts Under IFRSs, the present value of an
in-force (PVIF) long-term insurance contract is
determined by discounting future cash flows expected to emerge
from business currently in force using appropriate assumptions
plus a margin in assessing factors such as future mortality,
lapse rates and levels of expenses, and a discount rate that
reflects the risk free rate plus a margin for operational risk.
Movements in the PVIF of long-term insurance contracts are
included in other operating income. Under U.S. GAAP,
revenue is recognized over the life insurance policy term.
During the second quarter of 2009, we refined the income
recognition methodology in respect to long-term insurance
contracts. This resulted in the recognition of a revenue item on
an IFRSs basis of $66 million ($43 million after-tax).
Approximately $43 million ($28 million after-tax)
would have been recorded prior to January 1, 2009 if the
refinement in respect of income recognition had been applied at
that date.
Policyholder benefits Other revenues under
IFRSs include policyholder benefits expense which is classified
as other expense under U.S. GAAP.
Loans held for sale IFRSs requires loans
designated as held for sale at the time of origination to be
treated as trading assets and recorded at their fair value.
Under U.S. GAAP, loans designated as held for sale are
reflected as loans and recorded at the lower of amortized cost
or fair value. Under IFRSs, the income and expenses related to
receivables held for sale are reported in other operating
income. Under U.S. GAAP, the income and expenses related to
receivables held for sale are reported similarly to loans held
for investment.
For receivables transferred to held for sale subsequent to
origination, IFRSs requires these receivables to be reported
separately on the balance sheet but does not change the
recognition and measurement criteria. Accordingly, for IFRSs
purposes such loans continue to be accounted for in accordance
with IAS 39 with any gain or loss recorded at the time of sale.
U.S. GAAP requires loans that meet the held for sale
classification requirements be transferred to a held for sale
category at the lower of amortized cost or fair value. Under
U.S. GAAP, the component of the lower of amortized cost or
fair value adjustment related to credit risk is recorded in the
statement of income (loss) as provision for credit losses while
the component related to interest rates and liquidity factors is
reported in the statement of income (loss) in other revenues.
Certain receivables that were previously classified as held for
sale under U.S. GAAP have now been transferred to held for
investment as we now intend to hold for the foreseeable future.
Under U.S. GAAP, these receivables were subject to lower of
amortized cost or fair value adjustments while held for sale and
have been transferred to held for investment at the lower of
amortized cost or fair value. Since these receivables were not
classified as held for sale under IFRSs, these receivables were
always reported within loans and the measurement criteria did
not change. As a result, loan impairment charges are now being
recorded under IFRSs which were essentially included as a
component of the lower of cost or fair value adjustments under
U.S. GAAP.
78
HSBC Finance Corporation
Extinguishment of debt During the fourth
quarter of 2010, we exchanged $1.8 billion in senior debt
for $1.9 billion in new fixed rate subordinated debt. Under
IFRSs, the population of debt exchanged which qualified for
extinguishment treatment was larger than under U.S. GAAP
which resulted in a gain on extinguishment of debt under IFRSs
compared to a small loss under U.S. GAAP.
Securities Under IFRSs, securities include
HSBC shares held for stock plans at fair value. These shares are
recorded at fair value through other comprehensive income. If it
is determined these shares have become impaired, the fair value
loss is recognized in profit and loss and any fair value loss
recorded in other comprehensive income is reversed. There is no
similar requirement under U.S. GAAP.
During the second quarter of 2009, under IFRSs we recorded
income for the value of additional shares attributed to HSBC
shares held for stock plans as a result of HSBCs rights
offering earlier in 2009. During 2010, under IFRSs we recorded
additional gains as these shares vest. The additional shares are
not recorded under U.S. GAAP.
Other-than-temporary
impairments Under U.S. GAAP we are allowed
to evaluate perpetual preferred securities for potential
other-than-temporary
impairment similar to a debt security provided there has been no
evidence of deterioration in the credit of the issuer and record
the unrealized losses as a component of other comprehensive
income. There are no similar provisions under IFRSs as all
perpetual preferred securities are evaluated for
other-than-temporary
impairment as equity securities.
Effective January 1, 2009 under U.S. GAAP, the credit
loss component of an
other-than-temporary
impairment of a debt security is recognized in earnings while
the remaining portion of the impairment loss is recognized in
other comprehensive income provided a company concludes it
neither intends to sell the security nor concludes that it is
more-likely-than-not that it will have to sell the security
prior to recovery. Under IFRSs, there is no bifurcation of
other-than-temporary
impairment and the entire decline in value is recognized in
earnings.
REO expense Other revenues under IFRSs
includes losses on sale and the lower of amortized cost or fair
value adjustments on REO properties which are classified as
other expense under U.S. GAAP.
Loan
Impairment Charges (Provision for Credit Losses)
IFRSs requires a discounted cash flow methodology for estimating
impairment on pools of homogeneous customer loans which requires
the incorporation of the time value of money relating to
recovery estimates. Also under IFRSs, future recoveries on
charged-off loans are accrued for on a discounted basis and a
recovery asset is recorded. Subsequent recoveries are recorded
to earnings under U.S. GAAP, but are adjusted against the
recovery asset under IFRSs. Interest is recorded based on
collectibility under IFRSs.
As discussed above, under U.S. GAAP the credit risk
component of the lower of amortized cost or fair value
adjustment related to the transfer of receivables to held for
sale is recorded in the statement of income (loss) as provision
for credit losses. There is no similar requirement under IFRSs.
Operating
Expenses
Goodwill impairments Goodwill impairment
under IFRSs was higher than that under U.S. GAAP due to
higher levels of goodwill established under IFRSs as well as
differences in how impairment is measured as U.S. GAAP
requires a two-step impairment test which requires the fair
value of goodwill to be determined in the same manner as the
amount of goodwill recognized in a business combination.
Policyholder benefits Operating expenses
under IFRSs are lower as policyholder benefits expenses are
reported as an offset to other revenues as discussed above.
Pension costs Net income under U.S. GAAP
is lower than under IFRSs as a result of the amortization of the
amount by which actuarial losses exceed gains beyond the
10 percent corridor. Furthermore, in 2010
changes to future accruals for legacy participants under the
HSBC North America Pension Plan were accounted for as a plan
curtailment under IFRSs, which resulted in immediate income
recognition. Under U.S. GAAP, these changes were considered
to be a negative plan amendment which resulted in no immediate
income recognition.
79
HSBC Finance Corporation
Assets
Customer loans (Receivables) On an IFRSs
basis, loans designated as held for sale at the time of
origination and accrued interest are classified as trading
assets. However, the accounting requirements governing when
receivables previously held for investment are transferred to a
held for sale category are more stringent under IFRSs than under
U.S. GAAP. Unearned insurance premiums are reported as a
reduction to receivables on a U.S. GAAP basis but are
reported as insurance reserves for IFRSs.
Other In addition to the differences
discussed above, derivative financial assets are higher under
IFRSs than under U.S. GAAP as U.S. GAAP permits the
netting of certain items. No similar requirement exists under
IFRSs.
Reconciliation of our IFRS Basis segment results to the
U.S. GAAP consolidated totals are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Card and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustments/
|
|
|
IFRS Basis
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. GAAP
|
|
|
|
Retail
|
|
|
|
|
|
All
|
|
|
Reconciling
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
IFRS
|
|
|
IFRS
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
|
Services
|
|
|
Consumer
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Items
|
|
|
Totals
|
|
|
Adjustments(2)
|
|
|
Reclassifications(4)
|
|
|
Totals
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income
|
|
$
|
2,185
|
|
|
$
|
2,316
|
|
|
$
|
832
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
5,333
|
|
|
$
|
(284
|
)
|
|
$
|
(864
|
)
|
|
$
|
4,185
|
|
Other operating income (Total other revenues)
|
|
|
1,762
|
|
|
|
(30
|
)
|
|
|
(305
|
)
|
|
|
(25
|
)(1)
|
|
|
1,402
|
|
|
|
(73
|
)
|
|
|
1,238
|
|
|
|
2,567
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating income (loss)
|
|
|
3,947
|
|
|
|
2,286
|
|
|
|
527
|
|
|
|
(25
|
)
|
|
|
6,735
|
|
|
|
(357
|
)
|
|
|
374
|
|
|
|
6,752
|
|
Loan impairment charges (Provision for credit losses)
|
|
|
1,002
|
|
|
|
5,686
|
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
6,683
|
|
|
|
(500
|
)
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
6,180
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,945
|
|
|
|
(3,400
|
)
|
|
|
532
|
|
|
|
(25
|
)
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
|
143
|
|
|
|
377
|
|
|
|
572
|
|
Operating expenses
|
|
|
1,886
|
|
|
|
883
|
|
|
|
225
|
|
|
|
(25
|
)
|
|
|
2,969
|
|
|
|
132
|
|
|
|
377
|
|
|
|
3,478
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Profit (loss) before tax
|
|
$
|
1,059
|
|
|
$
|
(4,283
|
)
|
|
$
|
307
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
(2,917
|
)
|
|
$
|
11
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
(2,906
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intersegment revenues
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
73
|
|
|
|
(76
|
)
|
|
|
(25
|
)(1)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
68
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
62
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
132
|
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
179
|
|
Expenditures for long-lived
assets(3)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
Balances at end of period:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Customer loans (Receivables)
|
|
$
|
10,145
|
|
|
$
|
56,650
|
|
|
$
|
2,303
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
69,098
|
|
|
$
|
(491
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2,224
|
)
|
|
$
|
66,383
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
9,710
|
|
|
|
57,460
|
|
|
|
12,654
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
79,824
|
|
|
|
(3,364
|
)
|
|
|
(124
|
)
|
|
|
76,336
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income
|
|
$
|
2,595
|
|
|
$
|
2,544
|
|
|
$
|
1,024
|
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
|
$
|
6,165
|
|
|
$
|
(367
|
)
|
|
$
|
(740
|
)
|
|
$
|
5,058
|
|
Other operating income (Total other revenues)
|
|
|
2,629
|
|
|
|
71
|
|
|
|
(2,374
|
)
|
|
|
(26
|
)(1)
|
|
|
300
|
|
|
|
(714
|
)
|
|
|
1,126
|
|
|
|
712
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating income (loss)
|
|
|
5,224
|
|
|
|
2,615
|
|
|
|
(1,350
|
)
|
|
|
(24
|
)
|
|
|
6,465
|
|
|
|
(1,081
|
)
|
|
|
386
|
|
|
|
5,770
|
|
Loan impairment charges (Provision for credit losses)
|
|
|
2,355
|
|
|
|
7,927
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
10,297
|
|
|
|
(642
|
)
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
9,650
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,869
|
|
|
|
(5,312
|
)
|
|
|
(1,365
|
)
|
|
|
(24
|
)
|
|
|
(3,832
|
)
|
|
|
(439
|
)
|
|
|
391
|
|
|
|
(3,880
|
)
|
Operating expenses
|
|
|
2,409
|
|
|
|
1,278
|
|
|
|
2,630
|
(5)
|
|
|
(27
|
)
|
|
|
6,290
|
|
|
|
(463
|
)
|
|
|
391
|
|
|
|
6,218
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Profit (loss) before tax
|
|
$
|
460
|
|
|
$
|
(6,590
|
)
|
|
$
|
(3,995
|
)
|
|
$
|
3
|
|
|
$
|
(10,122
|
)
|
|
$
|
24
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
(10,098
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intersegment revenues
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
127
|
|
|
|
(106
|
)
|
|
|
(26
|
)(1)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
69
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
64
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
163
|
|
|
|
71
|
|
|
|
(32
|
)
|
|
|
202
|
|
Expenditures for long-lived
assets(3)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
51
|
|
Balances at end of period:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Customer loans (Receivables)
|
|
$
|
12,042
|
|
|
$
|
70,202
|
|
|
$
|
1,347
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
83,591
|
|
|
$
|
(594
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,300
|
)
|
|
$
|
81,697
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
11,031
|
|
|
|
71,298
|
|
|
|
11,610
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
93,938
|
|
|
|
(4,143
|
)
|
|
|
(150
|
)
|
|
|
89,645
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
80
HSBC Finance Corporation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Card and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustments/
|
|
|
IFRS Basis
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. GAAP
|
|
|
|
Retail
|
|
|
|
|
|
All
|
|
|
Reconciling
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
IFRS
|
|
|
IFRS
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
|
Services
|
|
|
Consumer
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Items
|
|
|
Totals
|
|
|
Adjustments(2)
|
|
|
Reclassifications(4)
|
|
|
Totals
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income
|
|
$
|
3,711
|
|
|
$
|
4,540
|
|
|
$
|
218
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
8,469
|
|
|
$
|
(221
|
)
|
|
$
|
(312
|
)
|
|
$
|
7,936
|
|
Other operating income (Total other revenues)
|
|
|
3,084
|
|
|
|
(85
|
)
|
|
|
2,523
|
|
|
|
(21
|
)(1)
|
|
|
5,501
|
|
|
|
(323
|
)
|
|
|
773
|
|
|
|
5,951
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating income (loss)
|
|
|
6,795
|
|
|
|
4,455
|
|
|
|
2,741
|
|
|
|
(21
|
)
|
|
|
13,970
|
|
|
|
(544
|
)
|
|
|
461
|
|
|
|
13,887
|
|
Loan impairment charges (Provision for credit losses)
|
|
|
3,770
|
|
|
|
9,084
|
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
12,891
|
|
|
|
(443
|
)
|
|
|
(38
|
)
|
|
|
12,410
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,025
|
|
|
|
(4,629
|
)
|
|
|
2,704
|
|
|
|
(21
|
)
|
|
|
1,079
|
|
|
|
(101
|
)
|
|
|
499
|
|
|
|
1,477
|
|
Operating expenses
|
|
|
2,191
|
|
|
|
1,562
|
|
|
|
1,406
|
(5)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
5,159
|
|
|
|
(486
|
)
|
|
|
499
|
|
|
|
5,172
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Profit (loss) before tax
|
|
$
|
834
|
|
|
$
|
( 6,191
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,298
|
|
|
$
|
(21
|
)
|
|
$
|
(4,080
|
)
|
|
$
|
385
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
(3,695
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intersegment revenues
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
183
|
|
|
|
(214
|
)
|
|
|
(4
|
)(1)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
65
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
76
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
169
|
|
|
|
90
|
|
|
|
(16
|
)
|
|
|
243
|
|
Expenditures for long-lived
assets(3)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
75
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
77
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
77
|
|
Balances at end of period:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Customer loans (Receivables)
|
|
$
|
15,331
|
|
|
$
|
87,404
|
|
|
$
|
81
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
102,816
|
|
|
$
|
(497
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,696
|
)
|
|
$
|
100,623
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
26,280
|
|
|
|
85,605
|
|
|
|
13,192
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
125,077
|
|
|
|
(4,720
|
)
|
|
|
(239
|
)
|
|
|
120,118
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
530
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
2,385
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
2,915
|
|
|
|
(621
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
2,294
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
Eliminates intersegment revenues.
|
|
(2)
|
IFRS Adjustments, which have been described more fully above,
consist of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Profit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
|
|
|
For
|
|
|
Costs
|
|
|
(Loss)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Credit
|
|
|
and
|
|
|
Before
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
Income
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Expenses
|
|
|
Tax
|
|
|
Receivables
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives and hedge accounting
|
|
$
|
12
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
12
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
(3,453
|
)
|
Goodwill and intangible assets
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
|
(54
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
223
|
|
Purchase accounting
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(31
|
)
|
|
|
74
|
|
|
|
48
|
|
Deferred loan origination costs and premiums
|
|
|
(40
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(14
|
)
|
|
|
(26
|
)
|
|
|
108
|
|
|
|
70
|
|
Credit loss impairment provisioning
|
|
|
(322
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(452
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
130
|
|
|
|
(580
|
)
|
|
|
(232
|
)
|
Loans held for resale
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
(75
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
78
|
|
|
|
(73
|
)
|
|
|
(50
|
)
|
Interest recognition
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
Other
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
|
(57
|
)
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
87
|
|
|
|
(94
|
)
|
|
|
(33
|
)
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
(284
|
)
|
|
$
|
(73
|
)
|
|
$
|
(500
|
)
|
|
$
|
132
|
|
|
$
|
11
|
|
|
$
|
(491
|
)
|
|
$
|
(3,364
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives and hedge accounting
|
|
$
|
6
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
6
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
(4,113
|
)
|
Goodwill and intangible assets
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(541
|
)
|
|
|
541
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
258
|
|
Purchase accounting
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
(83
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
81
|
|
|
|
105
|
|
|
|
68
|
|
Deferred loan origination costs and premiums
|
|
|
(137
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(15
|
)
|
|
|
(122
|
)
|
|
|
154
|
|
|
|
87
|
|
Credit loss impairment provisioning
|
|
|
(261
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
|
(310
|
)
|
|
|
(748
|
)
|
|
|
(348
|
)
|
Loans held for resale
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
(637
|
)
|
|
|
(548
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(68
|
)
|
|
|
(141
|
)
|
|
|
(88
|
)
|
Interest recognition
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
Other
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
(67
|
)
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
|
(98
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(30
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
(367
|
)
|
|
$
|
(714
|
)
|
|
$
|
(642
|
)
|
|
$
|
(463
|
)
|
|
$
|
24
|
|
|
$
|
(594
|
)
|
|
$
|
(4,143
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
81
HSBC Finance Corporation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Profit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
|
|
|
For
|
|
|
Costs
|
|
|
(Loss)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Credit
|
|
|
and
|
|
|
Before
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
Income
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Expenses
|
|
|
Tax
|
|
|
Receivables
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securitizations
|
|
$
|
(6
|
)
|
|
$
|
5
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
(2
|
)
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
Derivatives and hedge accounting
|
|
|
(30
|
)
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(4,426
|
)
|
Goodwill and intangible assets
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(481
|
)
|
|
|
481
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(140
|
)
|
Purchase accounting
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(17
|
)
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
Deferred loan origination costs and premiums
|
|
|
(165
|
)
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(71
|
)
|
|
|
(93
|
)
|
|
|
279
|
|
|
|
260
|
|
Credit loss impairment provisioning
|
|
|
(71
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(65
|
)
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
|
(49
|
)
|
|
|
(518
|
)
|
|
|
(246
|
)
|
Loans held for resale
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(453
|
)
|
|
|
(435
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(20
|
)
|
|
|
(230
|
)
|
|
|
(103
|
)
|
Interest recognition
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
(50
|
)
|
|
|
(50
|
)
|
Other
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
81
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(37
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
(221
|
)
|
|
$
|
(323
|
)
|
|
$
|
(443
|
)
|
|
$
|
(486
|
)
|
|
$
|
385
|
|
|
$
|
(497
|
)
|
|
$
|
(4,720
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3)
|
Includes goodwill associated with purchase business combinations
other than the HSBC merger as well as capital expenditures.
|
|
(4)
|
Represents differences in balance sheet and income statement
presentation between IFRS and U.S. GAAP.
|
|
(5)
|
In the first half of 2009, we recorded a goodwill impairment
charge on an IFRSs basis of $2.4 billion which represented
the entire remaining balance of goodwill. In the fourth quarter
of 2008, we recorded a goodwill impairment charge on an IFRSs
basis of $900 million which represents a portion of the
goodwill allocated to our Credit and Retail Services business.
|
25. Variable
Interest Entities
On January 1, 2010, we adopted the new guidance which
amends the accounting for the consolidation of variable interest
entities. The new guidance changed the approach for determining
the primary beneficiary of a VIE from a quantitative approach
focusing on risk and reward to a qualitative approach focusing
on the power to direct the activities of the VIE and the
obligation to absorb losses
and/or the
right to receive benefits of the VIE. The adoption of the new
guidance has not resulted in any changes to consolidated
entities for us.
Variable Interest Entities We consolidate
VIEs in which we are deemed to be the primary beneficiary
through our holding of a variable interest which is determined
as a controlling financial interest. The controlling financial
interest is evidenced by the power to direct the activities of a
VIE that most significantly impact its economic performance and
obligations to absorb losses of, or the right to receive
benefits from, the VIE that could be potentially significant to
the VIE. We take into account all of our involvements in a VIE
in identifying (explicit or implicit) variable interests that
individually or in the aggregate could be significant enough to
warrant our designation as the primary beneficiary and hence
require us to consolidate the VIE or otherwise require us to
make appropriate disclosures. We consider our involvement to be
significant where we, among other things, (i) provide
liquidity facilities to support the VIEs debt issuances,
(ii) enter into derivative contracts to absorb the risks
and benefits from the VIE or from the assets held by the VIE,
(iii) provide a financial guarantee that covers assets held
or liabilities issued, (iv) design, organize and structure
the transaction and (v) retain a financial or servicing
interest in the VIE.
We are required to evaluate whether to consolidate a VIE when we
first become involved and on an ongoing basis. In almost all
cases, a qualitative analysis of our involvement in the entity
provides sufficient evidence to determine whether we are the
primary beneficiary. In rare cases, a more detailed analysis to
quantify the extent of variability to be absorbed by each
variable interest holder is required to determine the primary
beneficiary.
Consolidated VIEs In the ordinary course of
business, we have organized special purpose entities
(SPEs) primarily to meet our own funding needs
through collateralized funding transactions. We transfer certain
receivables to these trusts which in turn issue debt instruments
collateralized by the transferred receivables. The entities used
in these transactions are VIEs and we are deemed to be their
primary beneficiary because we hold beneficial interests that
expose us to the majority of their expected losses. Accordingly,
we consolidate these entities
82
HSBC Finance Corporation
and report the debt securities issued by them as secured
financings in long-term debt. This has not changed as a result
of the new accounting guidance effective January 1, 2010.
As a result, all receivables transferred in these secured
financings have remained and continue to remain on our balance
sheet and the debt securities issued by them have remained and
continue to be included in long-term debt.
The following table summarizes the assets and liabilities of
these consolidated secured financing VIEs as of
December 31, 2010 and 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2010
|
|
|
December 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
Liabilities
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
|
Real estate collateralized funding vehicles:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Receivables, net
|
|
$
|
5,354
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
6,404
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
Available-for-sale
investments
|
|
|
104
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
3,882
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
4,678
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal
|
|
|
5,458
|
|
|
|
3,882
|
|
|
|
6,417
|
|
|
|
4,678
|
|
Credit card collateralized funding vehicles:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Receivables, net
|
|
|
1,970
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1,821
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
195
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal
|
|
|
1,970
|
|
|
|
195
|
|
|
|
1,821
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
7,428
|
|
|
$
|
4,077
|
|
|
$
|
8,238
|
|
|
$
|
4,678
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The assets of the consolidated VIEs serve as collateral for the
obligations of the VIEs. The holders of the debt securities
issued by these vehicles have no recourse to our general assets.
Prior to December 31, 2010, we disclosed as part of our
unconsolidated VIEs, a leverage lease which matured on
December 31, 2010. At December 31, 2010, the only
remaining asset of this leverage lease owned by the VIE was a
building. At December 31, 2010 we have now consolidated
this building with a carrying value of $16 million which is
included as a component of properties and equipment, net in our
consolidated balance sheet. At December 31, 2010, the fair
market value of this building is $19 million.
Unconsolidated VIEs We are involved with VIEs
related to low income housing partnerships, leveraged leases and
investments in community partnerships that were not consolidated
at December 31, 2010 or 2009 because we are not the primary
beneficiary. At December 31, 2010, we have assets totaling
$9 million on our consolidated balance sheet which
represents our maximum exposure to loss for these VIEs.
Additionally, we are involved with other VIEs which currently
provide funding to HSBC Bank USA through collateralized funding
transactions. We have not consolidated these VIEs at
December 31, 2010 or 2009 because we are not the primary
beneficiary as our relationship with these VIEs is limited to
servicing certain credit card and private label receivables of
the related trusts.
26. Fair
Value Measurements
Accounting principles related to fair value measurements provide
a framework for measuring fair value and focuses on an exit
price in the principal (or alternatively, the most advantageous)
market accessible in an orderly transaction between willing
market participants (the Fair Value Framework). The
Fair Value Framework establishes a three-tiered fair value
hierarchy with Level 1 representing quoted prices
(unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or
liabilities. Fair values determined by Level 2 inputs are
inputs that are observable for the identical asset or liability,
either directly or indirectly. Level 2 inputs include
quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active
markets, quoted prices for identical or similar assets or
liabilities in markets that are inactive, and inputs other than
quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability,
such as interest rates and yield curves that are observable
83
HSBC Finance Corporation
at commonly quoted intervals. Level 3 inputs are
unobservable inputs for the asset or liability and include
situations where there is little, if any, market activity for
the asset or liability. Transfers between leveling categories
are recognized at the end of each reporting period.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments The fair
value estimates, methods and assumptions set forth below for our
financial instruments, including those financial instruments
carried at cost, are made solely to comply with disclosures
required by generally accepted accounting principles in the
United States and should be read in conjunction with the
financial statements and notes included in this quarterly
report. The following table summarizes the carrying values and
estimated fair value of our financial instruments at
December 31, 2010 and 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2010
|
|
|
December 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
|
Financial assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
$
|
175
|
|
|
$
|
175
|
|
|
$
|
289
|
|
|
$
|
289
|
|
Interest bearing deposits with banks
|
|
|
1,016
|
|
|
|
1,016
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
Securities purchased under agreements to resell
|
|
|
4,311
|
|
|
|
4,311
|
|
|
|
2,850
|
|
|
|
2,850
|
|
Securities
|
|
|
3,371
|
|
|
|
3,371
|
|
|
|
3,187
|
|
|
|
3,187
|
|
Consumer receivables:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage Services:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First lien
|
|
|
12,425
|
|
|
|
8,810
|
|
|
|
15,244
|
|
|
|
8,824
|
|
Second lien
|
|
|
1,791
|
|
|
|
492
|
|
|
|
2,331
|
|
|
|
672
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Mortgage Services
|
|
|
14,216
|
|
|
|
9,302
|
|
|
|
17,575
|
|
|
|
9,496
|
|
Consumer Lending:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First lien
|
|
|
28,083
|
|
|
|
20,589
|
|
|
|
32,751
|
|
|
|
20,918
|
|
Second lien
|
|
|
2,859
|
|
|
|
691
|
|
|
|
3,791
|
|
|
|
1,149
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Consumer Lending real estate secured receivables
|
|
|
30,942
|
|
|
|
21,280
|
|
|
|
36,542
|
|
|
|
22,067
|
|
Non-real estate secured receivables
|
|
|
5,720
|
|
|
|
4,409
|
|
|
|
8,543
|
|
|
|
5,620
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Consumer Lending
|
|
|
36,662
|
|
|
|
25,689
|
|
|
|
45,085
|
|
|
|
27,687
|
|
Credit card
|
|
|
8,988
|
|
|
|
8,963
|
|
|
|
9,905
|
|
|
|
9,358
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total consumer receivables
|
|
|
59,866
|
|
|
|
43,954
|
|
|
|
72,565
|
|
|
|
46,541
|
|
Receivables held for sale
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
Due from affiliates
|
|
|
126
|
|
|
|
126
|
|
|
|
123
|
|
|
|
123
|
|
Derivative financial assets
|
|
|
75
|
|
|
|
75
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Financial liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial paper
|
|
|
3,156
|
|
|
|
3,156
|
|
|
|
4,291
|
|
|
|
4,291
|
|
Due to affiliates carried at fair value
|
|
|
436
|
|
|
|
436
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Due to affiliates
|
|
|
7,819
|
|
|
|
7,518
|
|
|
|
9,043
|
|
|
|
9,259
|
|
Long-term debt carried at fair value
|
|
|
20,844
|
|
|
|
20,844
|
|
|
|
26,745
|
|
|
|
26,745
|
|
Long-term debt not carried at fair value
|
|
|
33,772
|
|
|
|
32,924
|
|
|
|
42,135
|
|
|
|
40,346
|
|
Insurance policy and claim reserves
|
|
|
982
|
|
|
|
1,184
|
|
|
|
996
|
|
|
|
1,092
|
|
Derivative financial liabilities
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
|
60
|
|
84
HSBC Finance Corporation
Receivable values presented in the table above were determined
using the Fair Value Framework for measuring fair value, which
is based on our best estimate of the amount within a range of
values we believe would be received in a sale as of the balance
sheet date (i.e. exit price). The secondary market demand and
estimated value for our receivables has been heavily influenced
by the deteriorating economic conditions during the past few
years, including house price depreciation, rising unemployment,
changes in consumer behavior, changes in discount rates and the
lack of financing options available to support the purchase of
receivables. Many investors are non-bank financial institutions
or hedge funds with high equity levels and a high cost of debt.
For certain consumer receivables, investors incorporate numerous
assumptions in predicting cash flows, such as higher charge-off
levels
and/or
slower voluntary prepayment speeds than we, as the servicer of
these receivables, believe will ultimately be the case. The
investor discount rates reflect this difference in overall cost
of capital as well as the potential volatility in the underlying
cash flow assumptions, the combination of which may yield a
significant pricing discount from our intrinsic value. The
estimated fair values at December 31, 2010 and 2009 reflect
these market conditions.
Assets and Liabilities Recorded at Fair Value on a
Recurring Basis The following table presents
information about our assets and liabilities measured at fair
value on a recurring basis as of December 31, 2010 and
2009, and indicates the fair value hierarchy of the valuation
techniques utilized to determine such fair value.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total of
|
|
|
|
Quoted Prices in
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
Active Markets for
|
|
|
Significant Other
|
|
|
Significant
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Liabilities)
|
|
|
|
Identical Assets
|
|
|
Observable Inputs
|
|
|
Unobservable Inputs
|
|
|
|
|
|
Measured at
|
|
|
|
(Level 1)
|
|
|
(Level 2)
|
|
|
(Level 3)
|
|
|
Netting(1)
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
|
December 31, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative financial assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swaps
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
1,220
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
1,220
|
|
Currency swaps
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
2,067
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
2,067
|
|
Derivative netting
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(3,212
|
)
|
|
|
(3,212
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total derivative financial assets
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
3,287
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(3,212
|
)
|
|
|
75
|
|
Available-for-sale
securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury
|
|
|
349
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
349
|
|
U.S. government sponsored enterprises
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
284
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
285
|
|
U.S. government agency issued or guaranteed
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
Obligations of U.S. states and political subdivisions
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
Asset-backed securities
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
60
|
|
U.S. corporate debt securities
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1,799
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1,802
|
|
Foreign debt securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Government
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
84
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
98
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
344
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
344
|
|
Equity securities
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
Money market funds
|
|
|
353
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
353
|
|
Accrued interest
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
available-for-sale
securities
|
|
|
726
|
|
|
|
2,621
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
3,371
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
726
|
|
|
$
|
5,908
|
|
|
$
|
24
|
|
|
$
|
(3,212
|
)
|
|
$
|
3,446
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt carried at fair value
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
(21,281
|
)
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
(21,281
|
)
|
Derivative related liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swaps
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(611
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(611
|
)
|
Currency swaps
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(151
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(151
|
)
|
Foreign Exchange Forward
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
Derivative netting
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
763
|
|
|
|
763
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total derivative related liabilities
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(765
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
763
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
(22,046
|
)
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
763
|
|
|
$
|
(21,283
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
85
HSBC Finance Corporation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total of
|
|
|
|
Quoted Prices in
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
Active Markets for
|
|
|
Significant Other
|
|
|
Significant
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Liabilities)
|
|
|
|
Identical Assets
|
|
|
Observable Inputs
|
|
|
Unobservable Inputs
|
|
|
|
|
|
Measured at
|
|
|
|
(Level 1)
|
|
|
(Level 2)
|
|
|
(Level 3)
|
|
|
Netting(1)
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
|
December 31, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative financial assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swaps
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
1,288
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
1,288
|
|
Currency swaps
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
2,616
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
2,616
|
|
Derivative netting
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(3,904
|
)
|
|
|
(3,904
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total derivative financial assets
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
3,904
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(3,904
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
Available-for-sale
securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury
|
|
|
196
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
196
|
|
U.S. government sponsored enterprises
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
74
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
97
|
|
U.S. government agency issued or guaranteed
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
Obligations of U.S. states and political subdivisions
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
Asset-backed securities
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
57
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
83
|
|
U.S. corporate debt securities
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1,704
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1,724
|
|
Foreign debt securities
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
356
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
366
|
|
Equity securities
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
Money market funds
|
|
|
627
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
627
|
|
Accrued interest
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
available-for-sale
securities
|
|
|
855
|
|
|
|
2,283
|
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
3,187
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
855
|
|
|
$
|
6,187
|
|
|
$
|
49
|
|
|
$
|
(3,904
|
)
|
|
$
|
3,187
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt carried at fair value
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
(26,745
|
)
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
(26,745
|
)
|
Derivative related liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swaps
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(473
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(473
|
)
|
Currency swaps
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(117
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(117
|
)
|
Foreign Exchange Forward
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
Derivative netting
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
540
|
|
|
|
540
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total derivative related liabilities
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(600
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
540
|
|
|
|
(60
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
(27,345
|
)
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
540
|
|
|
$
|
(26,805
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Represents counterparty and swap collateral netting which allow
the offsetting of amounts relating to certain contracts when
certain conditions are met.
|
The following table provides additional detail regarding the
rating of our U.S. corporate debt securities at
December 31, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Level 2
|
|
|
Level 3
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
|
AAA to
AA(1)
|
|
$
|
381
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
381
|
|
A+ to
A-(1)
|
|
|
1,280
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1,280
|
|
BBB+ to
Unrated(1)
|
|
|
139
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
142
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
We obtain ratings on our U.S.
corporate debt securities from both Moodys Investor
Services and Standard and Poors Corporation. In the event
the ratings we obtain from these agencies differ, we utilize the
lower of the two ratings.
|
Significant Transfers Between Level 1 and
Level 2 Transfers from Level 1 (quoted
unadjusted prices in active markets for identical assets or
liabilities) to Level 2 (using inputs that are observable
for the identical asset or liability, either directly or
indirectly) totaled $59 million during 2010 and transfers
from Level 2 to Level 1 totaled $9 million during
2010 as a result of reclassifications in certain product
groupings. There were no transfers between Level 1 and
Level 2 during 2009 and 2008.
86
HSBC Finance Corporation
Information on Level 3 Assets and
Liabilities The table below reconciles the beginning
and ending balances for assets recorded at fair value using
significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) during 2010
and 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Gains and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Losses)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transfers
|
|
|
Transfers
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Included in
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Out of
|
|
|
Out of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Level 2
|
|
|
Level 3
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Period
|
|
|
|
Jan. 1,
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comp.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and Into
|
|
|
and Into
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Income
|
|
|
Income
|
|
|
Purchases
|
|
|
Issuances
|
|
|
Settlement
|
|
|
Level 3
|
|
|
Level 2
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Gains (Losses)
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
|
Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities
available-for-sale:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Government sponsored enterprises
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
(1
|
)
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
|
$
|
(2
|
)
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
Obligations of U.S. states and political subdivisions
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Asset-backed securities
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
U.S. corporate debt securities
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
(25
|
)
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
49
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
(9
|
)
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
(1
|
)
|
|
$
|
12
|
|
|
$
|
(27
|
)
|
|
$
|
24
|
|
|
$
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Gains and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Losses)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Included in
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transfers
|
|
|
Transfers
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Period
|
|
|
|
Jan. 1,
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comp.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Into
|
|
|
Out of
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Income
|
|
|
Income
|
|
|
Purchases
|
|
|
Issuances
|
|
|
Settlement
|
|
|
Level 3
|
|
|
Level 3
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Gains (Losses)
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
|
Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities
available-for-sale:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Government sponsored enterprises
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
4
|
|
|
$
|
(2
|
)
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
Obligations of U.S. states and political subdivisions
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Asset-backed securities
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
(32
|
)
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
U.S. corporate debt securities
|
|
|
84
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
102
|
|
|
|
(172
|
)
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Foreign debt securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Equity Securities
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(49
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Accrued interest
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
175
|
|
|
$
|
(5
|
)
|
|
$
|
(7
|
)
|
|
$
|
10
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
(49
|
)
|
|
$
|
138
|
|
|
$
|
(213
|
)
|
|
$
|
49
|
|
|
$
|
13
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets and Liabilities Recorded at Fair Value on a
Non-recurring Basis The following table presents
information about our assets and liabilities measured at fair
value on a non-recurring basis as of December 31, 2010 and
2009, and indicates the fair value hierarchy of the valuation
techniques utilized to determine such fair value.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Gains
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Losses) for the
|
|
|
|
Non-Recurring Fair Value Measurements as of
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2010
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
Level 1
|
|
|
Level 2
|
|
|
Level 3
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
|
Real estate secured receivables held for sale at fair value
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
4
|
|
|
$
|
4
|
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate
owned(1)
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
1,056
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
1,056
|
|
|
$
|
(224
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
87
HSBC Finance Corporation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Gains
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Losses) for the
|
|
|
|
Non-Recurring Fair Value Measurements as of
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2009
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
Level 1
|
|
|
Level 2
|
|
|
Level 3
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
|
Real estate secured
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
3
|
|
|
$
|
3
|
|
|
$
|
(9
|
)
|
Credit cards
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(367
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total receivables held for sale at fair value
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
3
|
|
|
$
|
3
|
|
|
$
|
(376
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate
owned(1)
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
688
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
688
|
|
|
$
|
(222
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill(2)
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
(2,294
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intangible
assets(2)
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
(14
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Real estate owned is required to be
reported on the balance sheet net of transactions costs. The
real estate owned amounts in the table above reflect the fair
value of the underlying asset unadjusted for transaction costs.
|
|
(2) |
|
During 2009, goodwill with a
carrying amount of $260 million allocated to our Insurance
Services business and $2,034 million allocated to our Card
and Retail Services businesses was written down to its implied
fair value of $0 million. Additionally, during 2009
technology, customer lists and customer loan related
relationship intangible assets totaling $34 million were
written down to their implied fair value of $20 million.
|
Valuation Techniques The following summarizes the
valuation methodologies used for assets and liabilities recorded
at fair value and for estimating fair value for financial
instruments not recorded at fair value but for which fair value
disclosures are required.
Cash: Carrying value approximates fair value due to
cashs liquid nature.
Interest bearing deposits with banks: Carrying value
approximates fair value due to the assets liquid nature.
Securities purchased under agreements to resell: The
fair value of securities purchased under agreements to resell
approximates carrying value due to the short-term maturity of
the agreements.
Securities: Fair value for our
available-for-sale
securities is generally determined by a third party valuation
source. The pricing services generally source fair value
measurements from quoted market prices and if not available, the
security is valued based on quotes from similar securities using
broker quotes and other information obtained from dealers and
market participants. For securities which do not trade in active
markets, such as fixed income securities, the pricing services
generally utilize various pricing applications, including
models, to measure fair value. The pricing applications are
based on market convention and use inputs that are derived
principally from or corroborated by observable market data by
correlation or other means. The following summarizes the
valuation methodology used for our major security types:
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury, U.S. government agency issued or
guaranteed and Obligations of U.S. States and political
subdivisions As these securities transact in an
active market, the pricing services source fair value
measurements from quoted prices for the identical security or
quoted prices for similar securities with adjustments as
necessary made using observable inputs which are market
corroborated.
|
|
|
|
U.S. government sponsored enterprises For
certain government sponsored mortgage-backed securities which
transact in an active market, the pricing services source fair
value measurements from quoted prices for the identical security
or quoted prices for similar securities with adjustments as
necessary made using observable inputs which are market
corroborated. For government sponsored mortgage-backed
securities which do not transact in an active market, fair value
is determined using discounted cash flow models and inputs
related to interest rates, prepayment speeds, loss curves and
market discount rates that would be required by investors in the
current market given the specific characteristics and inherent
credit risk of the underlying collateral.
|
88
HSBC Finance Corporation
|
|
|
|
|
Asset-backed securities Fair value is determined
using discounted cash flow models and inputs related to interest
rates, prepayment speeds, loss curves and market discount rates
that would be required by investors in the current market given
the specific characteristics and inherent credit risk of the
underlying collateral.
|
|
|
|
U.S. corporate and foreign debt securities For
non-callable corporate securities, a credit spread scale is
created for each issuer. These spreads are then added to the
equivalent maturity U.S. Treasury yield to determine
current pricing. Credit spreads are obtained from the new issue
market, secondary trading levels and dealer quotes. For
securities with early redemption features, an option adjusted
spread (OAS) model is incorporated to adjust the
spreads determined above. Additionally, the pricing services
will survey the broker/dealer community to obtain relevant trade
data including benchmark quotes and updated spreads.
|
|
|
|
Preferred equity securities In general, for
perpetual preferred securities, fair value is calculated using
an appropriate spread over a comparable U.S. Treasury
security for each issue. These spreads represent the additional
yield required to account for risk including credit, refunding
and liquidity. The inputs are derived principally from or
corroborated by observable market data.
|
|
|
|
Money market funds Carrying value approximates fair
value due to the assets liquid nature.
|
Significant inputs used in the valuation of our investment
securities include selection of an appropriate risk-free rate,
forward yield curve and credit spread which establish the
ultimate discount rate used to determine the net present value
of estimated cash flows. For asset-backed securities, selection
of appropriate prepayment rates, default rates and loss
severities also serve as significant inputs in determining fair
value. We perform validations of the fair values sourced from
the independent pricing services at least quarterly. Such
validation principally includes sourcing security prices from
other independent pricing services or broker quotes. The
validation process provides us with information as to whether
the volume and level of activity for a security has
significantly decreased and assists in identifying transactions
that are not orderly. Depending on the results of the
validation, additional information may be gathered from other
market participants to support the fair value measurements. A
determination will be made as to whether adjustments to the
observable inputs are necessary as a result of investigations
and inquiries about the reasonableness of the inputs used and
the methodologies employed by the independent pricing services.
Receivables and receivables held for sale: The
estimated fair value of our receivables was determined by
developing an approximate range of value from a mix of various
sources as appropriate for the respective pool of assets. These
sources include, among other items, value estimates from an HSBC
affiliate which reflect
over-the-counter
trading activity; forward looking discounted cash flow models
using assumptions we believe are consistent with those which
would be used by market participants in valuing such
receivables; trading input from other market participants which
includes observed primary and secondary trades; where
appropriate, the impact of current estimated rating agency
credit tranching levels with the associated benchmark credit
spreads; and general discussions held directly with potential
investors.
Model inputs include estimates of future interest rates,
prepayment speeds, default and loss curves, and market discount
rates reflecting managements estimate of the rate of
return that would be required by investors in the current market
given the specific characteristics and inherent credit risk of
the receivables. Some of these inputs are influenced by home
price changes and unemployment rates. To the extent available,
such inputs are derived principally from or corroborated by
observable market data by correlation and other means. We
perform periodic validations of our valuation methodologies and
assumptions based on the results of actual sales of such
receivables. In addition, from time to time, we will engage a
third party valuation specialist to measure the fair value of a
pool of receivables. Portfolio risk management personnel provide
further validation through discussions with third party brokers.
Since an active market for these receivables does not exist, the
fair value measurement process uses unobservable significant
inputs which are specific to the performance characteristics of
the various receivable portfolios.
Real estate owned: Fair value is determined based on
third party appraisals obtained at the time we take title to the
property and, if less than the carrying value of the loan, the
carrying value of the loan is adjusted to the fair value.
89
HSBC Finance Corporation
The carrying value is further reduced, if necessary, on a
quarterly basis to reflect observable local market data,
including local area sales data.
Due from affiliates: Carrying value approximates
fair value because the interest rates on these receivables
adjust with changing market interest rates.
Commercial paper: The fair value of these
instruments approximates existing carrying value because
interest rates on these instruments adjust with changes in
market interest rates due to their short-term maturity or
repricing characteristics.
Due to affiliates: The estimated fair value of our
fixed rate and floating rate debt due to affiliates was
determined using discounted future expected cash flows at
current interest rates and credit spreads offered for similar
types of debt instruments.
Long-term debt: Fair value was primarily determined
by a third party valuation source. The pricing services source
fair value from quoted market prices and, if not available,
expected cash flows are discounted using the appropriate
interest rate for the applicable duration of the instrument
adjusted for our own credit risk (spread). The credit spreads
applied to these instruments were derived from the spreads
recognized in the secondary market for similar debt as of the
measurement date. Where available, relevant trade data is also
considered as part of our validation process.
Insurance policy and claim reserves: The fair value
of insurance reserves for periodic payment annuities was
estimated by discounting future expected cash flows at estimated
market interest rates.
Derivative financial assets and
liabilities: Derivative values are defined as the
amount we would receive or pay to extinguish the contract using
a market participant as of the reporting date. The values are
determined by management using a pricing system maintained by
HSBC Bank USA. In determining these values, HSBC Bank USA uses
quoted market prices, when available, principally for
exchange-traded options. For non-exchange traded contracts, such
as interest rate swaps, fair value is determined using
discounted cash flow modeling techniques. Valuation models
calculate the present value of expected future cash flows based
on models that utilize independently-sourced market parameters,
including interest rate yield curves, option volatilities, and
currency rates. Valuations may be adjusted in order to ensure
that those values represent appropriate estimates of fair value.
These adjustments are generally required to reflect factors such
as market liquidity and counterparty credit risk that can affect
prices in arms-length transactions with unrelated third parties.
Finally, other transaction specific factors such as the variety
of valuation models available, the range of unobservable model
inputs and other model assumptions can affect estimates of fair
value. Imprecision in estimating these factors can impact the
amount of revenue or loss recorded for a particular position.
Counterparty credit risk is considered in determining the fair
value of a financial asset. The Fair Value Framework specifies
that the fair value of a liability should reflect the
entitys non-performance risk and accordingly, the effect
of our own credit risk (spread) has been factored into the
determination of the fair value of our financial liabilities,
including derivative instruments. In estimating the credit risk
adjustment to the derivative assets and liabilities, we take
into account the impact of netting
and/or
collateral arrangements that are designed to mitigate
counterparty credit risk.
27. Commitments
and Contingent Liabilities
Lease Obligations We lease certain offices, buildings and
equipment for periods which generally do not exceed
25 years. The leases have various renewal options. The
office space leases generally require us to pay certain
operating expenses. Net rental expense under operating leases
was $32 million in 2010, $96 million in 2009 and
$96 million in 2008. During 2010, changes were made in the
methodology used to allocate rental expense between us and HTSU.
See Note 23, Related Party Transactions, for
additional information.
We have lease obligations on certain office space which has been
subleased through the end of the lease period. Under these
agreements, the sublessee has assumed future rental obligations
on the lease.
90
HSBC Finance Corporation
Future net minimum lease commitments under noncancelable
operating lease arrangements were:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minimum
|
|
|
Minimum
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rental
|
|
|
Sublease
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ending December 31,
|
|
Payments
|
|
|
Income
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
|
2011
|
|
$
|
36
|
|
|
$
|
(4
|
)
|
|
$
|
32
|
|
2012
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
22
|
|
2013
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
17
|
|
2014
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
16
|
|
2015
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
14
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
76
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
73
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net minimum lease commitments
|
|
$
|
195
|
|
|
$
|
(21
|
)
|
|
$
|
174
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As a result of the strategic actions undertaken since mid-2007
and continuing in to 2009, we have recorded a liability of
$6 million at December 31, 2010 related to certain
noncancelable leases for which are no longer using the
properties. See Note 5, Strategic Initiatives,
for further discussion of the various actions as well as the
total restructuring liabilities outstanding.
Litigation and Regulatory Matters In addition to the
matters described below, in the ordinary course of business, we
are routinely named as defendants in, or as parties to, various
legal actions and proceedings relating to activities of our
current
and/or
former operations. These actual or threatened legal actions and
proceedings may include claims for substantial or indeterminate
compensatory or punitive damages, or for injunctive relief. In
the ordinary course of business, we also are subject to
governmental and regulatory examinations, information-gathering
requests, investigations and proceedings (both formal and
informal), certain of which may result in adverse judgments,
settlements, fines, penalties, injunctions or other relief. In
connection with formal and informal inquiries by these
regulators, we receive numerous requests, subpoenas and orders
seeking documents, testimony and other information in connection
with various aspects of our regulated activities.
In view of the inherent unpredictability of litigation and
regulatory matters, particularly where the damages sought are
substantial or indeterminate or the proceedings or
investigations are in the early stages, we cannot determine with
any degree of certainty the timing or ultimate resolution of
litigation and regulatory matters or the eventual loss, fines,
penalties or business impact, if any, that may result. We
establish reserves for litigation and regulatory matters when
those matters present loss contingencies that are both probable
and can be reasonably estimated. The actual costs of resolving
litigation and regulatory matters, however, may be substantially
higher or lower than the amounts reserved for those matters.
We believe that the eventual outcome of litigation and
regulatory matters, unless otherwise noted below, would not be
likely to have a material adverse effect on our consolidated
financial condition. However, given the substantial or
indeterminate amounts sought in certain of these matters, and
the inherent unpredictability of such matters, an adverse
outcome in certain of these matters could have a material
adverse effect on our consolidated results of operations or cash
flows in particular quarterly or annual periods.
Litigation
Card Services Litigation Since June 2005, HSBC Finance
Corporation, HSBC North America, and HSBC, as well as other
banks and Visa Inc. and Master Card Incorporated, were named as
defendants in four class actions filed in Connecticut and the
Eastern District of New York; Photos Etc. Corp. et
al. v. Visa U.S.A., Inc., et al. (D. Conn.
No. 3:05-CV-01007
(WWE)): National Association of Convenience Stores, et
al. v. Visa U.S.A., Inc., et al.(E.D.N.Y.
No. 05-CV
4520 (JG)); Jethro Holdings, Inc., et al. v. Visa
U.S.A., Inc. et al. (E.D.N.Y.
No. 05-CV-4521
(JG)); and American Booksellers Assn v. Visa
U.S.A., Inc. et al. (E.D.N.Y.
No. 05-CV-5391
(JG)). Numerous other complaints containing similar allegations
(in which no HSBC entity is named) were filed across the country
against Visa Inc., MasterCard Incorporated and other banks.
These actions principally allege that the imposition of a
no-surcharge
91
HSBC Finance Corporation
rule by the associations
and/or the
establishment of the interchange fee charged for credit card
transactions causes the merchant discount fee paid by retailers
to be set at supracompetitive levels in violation of the Federal
antitrust laws. These suits have been consolidated and
transferred to the Eastern District of New York. The
consolidated case is: In re Payment Card Interchange Fee and
Merchant Discount Antitrust Litigation, MDL 1720, E.D.N.Y.
(MDL 1720). A consolidated, amended complaint
was filed by the plaintiffs on April 24, 2006 and a second
consolidated amended complaint was filed on January 29,
2009. The parties are engaged in discovery, motion practice and
mediation. On February 7, 2011, MasterCard Incorporated,
Visa Inc., the other defendants, including HSBC Finance
Corporation, and certain affiliates of the defendants entered
into settlement and judgment sharing agreements (the
Agreements) that provide for the apportionment of
certain defined costs and liabilities that the defendants,
including HSBC Finance Corporation and our affiliates, may
incur, jointly
and/or
severally, in the event of an adverse judgment or global
settlement of one or all of these actions. The Agreements also
cover any other potential or future actions that are transferred
for coordinated pre-trial proceedings with MDL 1720. We continue
to defend the claims in this action vigorously and our entry
into the Agreements in no way serves as an admission as to the
validity of the allegations in the complaints. Similarly, the
Agreements have had no impact on our ability to quantify the
potential impact from this action, if any, and we are unable to
do so at this time.
Securities Litigation As a result of an August 2002
restatement of previously reported consolidated financial
statements and other corporate events, including the 2002
settlement with 46 states and the District of Columbia
relating to real estate lending practices, Household
International and certain former officers were named as
defendants in a class action lawsuit, Jaffe v. Household
International, Inc., et al., No. 02 C 5893 (N.D. Ill.,
filed August 19, 2002). The complaint asserted claims under
§ 10 and § 20 of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, on behalf of all persons who acquired and disposed of
Household International common stock between July 30, 1999
and October 11, 2002. The claims alleged that the
defendants knowingly or recklessly made false and misleading
statements of material fact relating to Households
Consumer Lending operations, including collections, sales and
lending practices, some of which ultimately led to the
2002 state settlement agreement, and facts relating to
accounting practices evidenced by the restatement. A jury trial
concluded on April 30, 2009 and the jury rendered a verdict
on May 7 partially in favor of the plaintiffs with respect to
Household International and three former officers. A second
phase of the case was to proceed to determine the actual
damages, if any, due to the plaintiff class and issues of
reliance. On November 22, 2010 the Court issued a ruling on
the second phase of the case. On the issue of reliance, the
Court ruled that claim forms will be mailed to class members.
Class members who file claims will be asked to check a
YES or NO box to a question that asks
whether they would have purchased Household stock had they known
false and misleading statements inflated the stock price. As for
damages, the Court set out a method for calculating damages for
class members who file claims. The defendants filed a motion for
reconsideration from the Courts November 22 ruling. On
January 14, 2011, the Court partially granted that motion:
slightly modifying the claim form; allowing defendants to take
certain discovery on the issue of reliance; and reserving on the
issue whether the defendants would ultimately be entitled to a
jury trial on the issues of reliance and damages. On
January 31, 2011, the Court issued another ruling further
modifying the decision on the scope of discovery. Plaintiffs
have mailed the claim forms with the modified language and class
members will have until May 24 to file claims.
Given the complexity and uncertainties associated with the
actual determination of damages, including, but not limited to
the number of class members that may file valid claims, the
number of claims that can be substantiated by class members by
providing adequate documentation, the reduction of trading
losses by any trading gains made over the relevant period, the
determination of reliance by class members on the financial
statements, and whether any given class member was the
beneficial owner of the shares, we are unable at this time to
reasonably estimate the amount of any damages award, or range of
possible awards, that could arise as a result of the ruling and
the ultimate resolution of this matter. In filings with the
Court, plaintiffs lawyers have estimated that damages
could range somewhere between $2.4-$3.2 billion to
class members, before pre-judgment interest. Although it
is not reasonably possible to estimate the financial impact of
the ultimate resolution of this matter, the financial impact
could be material.
The date on which the court may enter a final judgment is not
known at this time. When a final judgment is entered by the
District Court, the parties have 30 days in which to appeal
the verdict to the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals.
92
HSBC Finance Corporation
Based on our discussions with outside counsel, we continue to
believe that neither Household nor its former officers committed
or engaged in any wrongdoing and we have meritorious grounds for
appeal of one or more of the rulings in the case.
Governmental
and Regulatory Matters
State and federal officials are investigating the procedures
followed by mortgage servicing companies and banks, including
HSBC Finance Corporation and certain of our affiliates, relating
to foreclosures. We and our affiliates have responded to all
related inquiries and cooperated with all applicable
investigations, including a joint examination by staffs of the
Federal Reserve Board (the Federal Reserve) and the
Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (the OCC)
as part of their broad horizontal review of industry foreclosure
practices. Following the examination, the Federal Reserve issued
a supervisory letter to HSBC Finance and HSBC North America
noting certain deficiencies in the processing, preparation and
signing of affidavits and other documents supporting
foreclosures and in governance of and resources devoted to our
foreclosure processes, including the evaluation and mentoring of
third party law firms retained to effect our foreclosures.
Certain other processes were deemed adequate. The OCC issued a
similar supervisory letter to HSBC Bank USA. We have suspended
foreclosures until such time as we have substantially addressed
the noted deficiencies in our processes. We are also reviewing
foreclosures where judgment has not yet been entered and will
correct deficient documentation and re-file affidavits where
necessary.
We and our affiliates are engaged in discussions with the
Federal Reserve and the OCC regarding the terms of consent cease
and desist orders, which will prescribe actions to address the
deficiencies noted in the joint examination. We expect the
consent orders will be finalized shortly after the date this
Form 10-K
is filed. While the impact of the Federal Reserve consent order
on HSBC Finance Corporation depends on the final terms, we
believe it has the potential to increase our operational,
reputational and legal risk profiles and expect implementation
of its provisions will require significant financial and
managerial resources. In addition, the consent orders will not
preclude further actions against HSBC Finance Corporation or our
affiliates by bank regulatory or other agencies, including the
imposition of fines and civil money penalties. We are unable at
this time, however, to determine the likelihood of any further
action or the amount of penalties or fines, if any, that may be
imposed by the regulators or agencies.
28. Concentration
of Credit Risk
A concentration of credit risk is defined as a significant
credit exposure with an individual or group engaged in similar
activities or having similar economic characteristics that would
cause their ability to meet contractual obligations to be
similarly affected by changes in economic or other conditions.
We have historically served non-conforming and non-prime
consumers. Such customers are individuals who have limited
credit histories, modest incomes, high
debt-to-income
ratios or have experienced credit problems caused by occasional
delinquencies, prior charge-offs, bankruptcy or other credit
related actions. The majority of our secured receivables and
receivables held for sale have high
loan-to-value
ratios. Our receivables and receivables held for sale portfolios
include the following types of loans:
|
|
|
Interest-only loans A loan which allows a customer
to pay the interest-only portion of the monthly payment for a
period of time which results in lower payments during the
initial loan period. However, subsequent events affecting a
customers financial position could affect their ability to
repay the loan in the future when the principal payments are
required.
|
|
|
ARM loans A loan which allows the lender to adjust
pricing on the loan in line with interest rate movements. A
customers financial situation and the general interest
rate environment at the time of the interest rate reset could
affect the customers ability to repay or refinance the
loan after adjustment.
|
|
|
Stated income loans Loans underwritten based upon
the loan applicants representation of annual income, which
is not verified by receipt of supporting documentation.
|
93
HSBC Finance Corporation
The following table summarizes the outstanding balances of
interest-only loans, ARM loans and stated income loans in our
receivable portfolios at December 31, 2010 and 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31,
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(in billions)
|
|
Interest-only loans
|
|
$
|
1.3
|
|
|
$
|
1.8
|
|
ARM
loans(1)(2)
|
|
|
7.5
|
|
|
|
9.8
|
|
Stated income loans
|
|
|
2.7
|
|
|
|
3.7
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Receivable classification as ARM
loans is based on the classification at the time of receivable
origination and does not reflect any changes in the
classification that may have occurred as a result of any loan
modification.
|
|
(2) |
|
We do not have any option ARM loans
in our portfolio.
|
At December 31, 2010 and 2009, interest-only, ARM and
stated income loans comprise 18 percent and 20 percent
of real estate secured receivables, including receivables held
for sale, respectively.
Because we primarily lend to individual consumers, we do not
have receivables from any industry group that equal or exceed
10 percent of total receivables at December 31, 2010
and 2009. We lend nationwide and our receivables, including
receivables held for sale, are distributed as follows at
December 31, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent of Total
|
State/Region
|
|
Receivables
|
|
|
California
|
|
|
10
|
%
|
Midwest (IL, IN, IA, KS, MI, MN, MO, NE, ND, OH, SD, WI)
|
|
|
23
|
|
Southeast (AL, FL, GA, KY, MS, NC, SC, TN)
|
|
|
21
|
|
West (AK, CO, HI, ID, MT, NV, OR, UT, WA, WY)
|
|
|
8
|
|
Middle Atlantic (DE, DC, MD, NJ, PA, VA, WV)
|
|
|
17
|
|
Southwest (AZ, AR, LA, NM, OK, TX)
|
|
|
9
|
|
Northeast (CT, ME, MA, NH, NY, RI, VT)
|
|
|
12
|
|
The following table reflects the percentage of consumer
receivables by state, including receivables held for sale, which
individually account for 5 percent or greater of our
portfolio.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage of Portfolio Receivables at
|
|
Percent of
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2010
|
|
Total Receivables
|
|
Unemployment
|
|
|
Credit
|
|
Real Estate
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
December 31,
|
|
Rates for
|
|
|
Cards
|
|
Secured
|
|
Other
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
Dec.
2010(1)
|
|
|
California
|
|
|
10.6
|
%
|
|
|
9.9
|
%
|
|
|
5.8
|
%
|
|
|
9.6
|
%
|
|
|
10.4
|
%
|
|
|
12.5
|
%
|
New York
|
|
|
7.4
|
|
|
|
7.0
|
|
|
|
6.8
|
|
|
|
7.0
|
|
|
|
6.8
|
|
|
|
8.2
|
|
Florida
|
|
|
6.9
|
|
|
|
6.3
|
|
|
|
5.7
|
|
|
|
6.3
|
|
|
|
6.6
|
|
|
|
12.0
|
|
Pennsylvania
|
|
|
4.2
|
|
|
|
5.9
|
|
|
|
6.4
|
|
|
|
5.7
|
|
|
|
5.5
|
|
|
|
8.5
|
|
Ohio
|
|
|
4.2
|
|
|
|
5.5
|
|
|
|
6.0
|
|
|
|
5.4
|
|
|
|
5.2
|
|
|
|
9.6
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The U.S. national unemployment rate
for December 2010 was 9.4 percent.
|
94