Attached files

file filename
EX-31 - EX-31 - Sentio Healthcare Properties Inca59506exv31.htm
EX-32 - EX-32 - Sentio Healthcare Properties Inca59506exv32.htm
Table of Contents

 
 
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
     
þ   QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2011
or
     
o   TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from                      to                     
Commission File Number 000-53969
CORNERSTONE HEALTHCARE PLUS REIT, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
     
MARYLAND   20-5721212
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)   (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
     
1920 MAIN STREET, SUITE 400, IRVINE, CA   92614
(Address of principal executive offices)   (Zip Code)
949-852-1007
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
Not Applicable
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)
          Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
þ Yes     o No
          Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (Sec.232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
o Yes     o No
          Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See definition of “accelerated filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
             
Large accelerated filer o   Accelerated filer o   Non-accelerated filer o   Smaller reporting company þ
          Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
o Yes     þ No
     As of May 10, 2011, there were 13,079,203 shares of common stock of Cornerstone Healthcare Plus REIT, Inc. outstanding.
 
 

 


 

PART I — FINANCIAL INFORMATION
FORM 10-Q
Cornerstone Healthcare Plus REIT, Inc.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
         
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
       
 
       
Item 1. Financial Statements:
       
    3  
 
       
    4  
 
       
    5  
 
       
    6  
 
       
    7  
 
       
    22  
 
       
    28  
 
       
    29  
 
       
    29  
 
       
    29  
 
       
    31  
 
       
    35  
 
       
    36  
 EX-31
 EX-32

2


Table of Contents

CORNERSTONE HEALTHCARE PLUS REIT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(Unaudited)
                 
    March 31,     December 31,  
    2011     2010  
ASSETS
               
Cash and cash equivalents
  $ 37,937,000     $ 29,819,000  
Investments in real estate
               
Land
    20,269,000       18,949,000  
Buildings and improvements, net
    109,468,000       87,933,000  
Furniture, fixtures and equipment, net
    2,617,000       2,410,000  
Development costs and construction in progress
    288,000       13,669,000  
Intangible lease assets, net
    7,718,000       5,907,000  
 
           
 
    140,360,000       128,868,000  
 
               
Deferred financing costs, net
    1,266,000       1,382,000  
Tenant and other receivables
    1,629,000       1,462,000  
Receivable from related parties, net (Note 13)
           
Deferred costs and other assets
    1,562,000       554,000  
Restricted cash
    2,824,000       2,942,000  
Goodwill
    5,606,000       5,329,000  
 
           
Total assets
  $ 191,184,000     $ 170,356,000  
 
           
 
               
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
               
Liabilities:
               
Notes payable
  $ 90,885,000     $ 80,792,000  
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities
    8,525,000       4,886,000  
Payable to related parties
    1,000       65,000  
Prepaid rent and security deposits
    1,403,000       1,127,000  
Distributions payable
    807,000       722,000  
 
           
Total liabilities
    101,621,000       87,592,000  
 
               
Commitments and contingencies (Note 14)
               
 
               
Equity:
               
STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
               
Preferred stock, $0.01 par value per share; 20,000,000 shares authorized; no shares were issued or outstanding at March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010
           
Common stock, $0.01 par value per share; 580,000,000 shares authorized; 12,827,244 and 11,592,883 shares issued and outstanding at March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively
    128,000       116,000  
Additional paid-in capital
    100,046,000       91,588,000  
Accumulated deficit
    (13,315,000 )     (11,722,000 )
 
           
Total stockholders’ equity
    86,859,000       79,982,000  
Noncontrolling interests
    2,704,000       2,782,000  
 
           
Total equity
    89,563,000       82,764,000  
 
           
Total liabilities and equity
  $ 191,184,000     $ 170,356,000  
 
           
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated interim financial statements.

3


Table of Contents

CORNERSTONE HEALTHCARE PLUS REIT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Unaudited)
                 
    Three Months Ended  
    March 31,  
    2011     2010  
Revenues:
               
Rental revenues
  $ 7,560,000     $ 2,437,000  
Resident services and fee income
    1,702,000       495,000  
Tenant reimbursements and other income
    323,000       110,000  
 
           
 
    9,585,000       3,042,000  
Expenses:
               
Property operating and maintenance expenses
    5,688,000       1,860,000  
General and administrative expenses
    664,000       528,000  
Asset management fees and expenses
    431,000       165,000  
Real estate acquisition costs and earn out costs
    1,127,000       458,000  
Depreciation and amortization
    1,861,000       640,000  
 
           
 
    9,771,000       3,651,000  
 
           
Loss from operations
    (186,000 )     (609,000 )
 
               
Other income (expense):
               
Interest income
    4,000       3,000  
Interest expense
    (1,476,000 )     (337,000 )
 
           
 
               
Net loss
    (1,658,000 )     (943,000 )
Less: Net (loss) income attributable to the noncontrolling interests
    (65,000 )     4,000  
 
           
Net loss attributable to common stockholders
  $ (1,593,000 )   $ (947,000 )
 
           
 
               
Basic and diluted net loss per common share attributable to common stockholders
  $ (0.13 )   $ (0.17 )
 
           
 
               
Weighted average number of common shares
    12,207,623       5,414,179  
 
               
Distribution declared, per common share
  $ 0.19     $ 0.19  
 
           
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated interim financial statements.

4


Table of Contents

CORNERSTONE HEALTHCARE PLUS REIT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EQUITY
For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2011 and 2010
(Unaudited)
                                                         
    Common Stock              
            Common     Additional             Total              
    Number of     Stock Par     Paid-In     Accumulated     Stockholders’     Noncontrolling        
    Shares     Value     Capital     Deficit     Equity     Interests     Total Equity  
Balance — December 31, 2010
    11,592,883     $ 116,000     $ 91,588,000     $ (11,722,000 )   $ 79,982,000     $ 2,782,000     $ 82,764,000  
Issuance of common stock
    1,278,151       13,000       12,682,000             12,695,000             12,695,000  
Redeemed shares
    (43,790 )     (1,000 )     (409,000 )           (410,000 )           (410,000 )
Noncontrolling interest contribution
                                         
Offering costs
                (1,539,000 )           (1,539,000 )           (1.539,000 )
Distributions
                (2,276,000 )           (2,276,000 )     (13,000 )     (2,289,000 )
Net (loss) income
                      (1,593,000 )     (1,593,000 )     (65,000 )     (1,658,000 )
 
                                         
Balance — March 31, 2011
    12,827,244     $ 128,000     $ 100,046,000     $ (13,315,000 )   $ 86,859,000     $ 2,704,000     $ 89,563,000  
 
                                         
                                                         
    Common Stock              
            Common     Additional             Total              
    Number of     Stock Par     Paid-In     Accumulated     Stockholders’     Noncontrolling        
    Shares     Value     Capital     Deficit     Equity     Interests     Total Equity  
Balance — December 31, 2009
    4,993,751     $ 50,000     $ 39,551,000     $ (5,403,000 )   $ 34,198,000     $     $ 34,198,000  
Issuance of common stock
    1,403,524       14,000       13,997,000             14,011,000             14,011,000  
Redeemed shares
    (10,209 )           (98,000 )           (98,000 )           (98,000 )
Noncontrolling interest contribution
                                  886,000       886,000  
Offering costs
                (1,546,000 )           (1,546,000 )           (1,546,000 )
Distributions
                (1,031,000 )           (1,031,000 )     (4,000 )     (1,035,000 )
Net (loss) income
                      (947,000 )     (947,000 )     4,000       (943,000 )
 
                                         
Balance — March 31, 2010
    6,387,066     $ 64,000     $ 50,873,000     $ (6,350,000 )   $ 44,587,000     $ 886,000     $ 45,473,000  
 
                                         
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated interim financial statements.

5


Table of Contents

CORNERSTONE HEALTHCARE PLUS REIT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
                 
    Three Months Ended  
    March 31,  
    2011     2010  
Cash flows from operating activities:
               
Net loss
  $ (1,658,000 )   $ (943,000 )
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities (net of acquisitions):
               
Amortization of deferred financing costs
    154,000       9,000  
Depreciation and amortization
    1,861,000       640,000  
Straight-line rent amortization
    (200,000 )     (73,000  
Real estate earn out costs
    521,000        
Bad debt expense
    1,630,000        
Change in operating assets and liabilities:
               
Tenant and other receivables
    34,000       240,000  
Deferred costs and deposits
          (69,000 )
Prepaid expenses and other assets
    (731,000 )     44,000  
Restricted cash
    264,000          
Prepaid rent and tenant security deposits
    276,000       56,000  
Payable to related parties
    (38,000 )     (206,000 )
Receivable from related parties
    (1,630,000 )      
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities
    1,100,000       350,000  
 
           
Net cash provided by operating activities
    1,583,000       48,000  
 
               
Cash flows from investing activities:
               
Real estate acquisitions
    (10,750,000 )      
Additions to real estate
    (179,000 )     (7,000 )
Restricted cash
    (146,000 )     (750,000 )
Development of real estate
    (779,000 )     (2,243,000 )
Acquisition deposits
    (170,000 )     (535,000 )
 
           
Net cash used in investing activities
    (12,024,000 )     (3,535,000 )
 
               
Cash flows from financing activities:
               
Proceeds from issuance of common stock
    11,609,000       13,545,000  
Redeemed shares
    (410,000 )     (98,000 )
Repayment of note payable
    (209,000 )     (46,000 )
Proceeds from notes payable
    10,302,000       1,000  
Offering costs
    (1,565,000 )     (1,692,000 )
Deferred financing costs
    (50,000 )     (10,000 )
Noncontrolling interest contribution
          886,000  
Distributions paid to stockholders
    (1,105,000 )     (484,000 )
Distributions paid to noncontrolling interests
    (13,000 )     (4,000 )
 
           
Net cash provided by financing activities
    18,559,000       12,098,000  
 
           
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents
    8,118,000       8,611,000  
Cash and cash equivalents — beginning of period
    29,819,000       14,900,000  
 
           
Cash and cash equivalents — end of period
  $ 37,937,000     $ 23,511,000  
 
               
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:
               
Cash paid for interest
  $ 1,260,000     $ 219,000  
Supplemental disclosure of non-cash financing and investing activities:
               
Distributions declared not paid
  $ 807,000     $ 386,000  
Distribution reinvested
  $ 1,086,000     $ 466,000  
Capitalized interest
  $ 19,000     $  
Payable to related parties
  $     $ 104,000  
Accrued acquisition fees
  $     $ 30,000  
Accrued promote monetization liability
  $ 2,018,000     $  
Deferred financing amortization capitalized to real estate development
  $ 12,000     $  
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated interim financial statements.

6


Table of Contents

CORNERSTONE HEALTHCARE PLUS REIT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
March 31, 2011
(UNAUDITED)
1. Organization
Cornerstone Healthcare Plus REIT, Inc. (formerly known as Cornerstone Growth & Income REIT, Inc.), a Maryland corporation, was formed on October 16, 2006 under the Maryland General Corporation Law for the purpose of engaging in the business of investing in and owning commercial real estate. As used in this report, the “Company”, “we”, “us” and “our” refer to Cornerstone Healthcare Plus REIT, Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries, except where context otherwise requires. We are recently formed and are subject to the general risks associated with a start-up enterprise, including the risk of business failure. Subject to certain restrictions and limitations, our business is managed by an affiliate, Cornerstone Leveraged Realty Advisors, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company that was formed on October 16, 2006 (the “Advisor”), pursuant to an advisory agreement.
Cornerstone Healthcare Plus Operating Partnership, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership (the “Operating Partnership”), was formed on October 17, 2006. At March 31, 2011, we owned approximately a 99.8% general partner interest in the Operating Partnership while the Advisor owned approximately a 0.2% limited partnership interest. In addition, the Advisor owned approximately a 0.9% limited partnership interest in CGI Healthcare Operating Partnership, L.P., a subsidiary of the Operating Partnership. We anticipate that we will conduct all or a portion of our operations through the Operating Partnership. Our financial statements and the financial statements of the Operating Partnership are consolidated in the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements. All intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
For federal income tax purposes, we have elected to be taxed as a real estate investment trust under Sections 856 through 860 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), beginning with our taxable year ended December 31, 2008. REIT status imposes limitations related to operating assisted-living properties. Generally, to qualify as a REIT, we cannot directly operate assisted-living facilities. However, such facilities may generally be operated by a taxable REIT subsidiary (“TRS”) pursuant to a lease with the Company. Therefore, we have formed Master HC TRS, LLC (“Master TRS”), a wholly owned subsidiary of CGI Healthcare Operating Partnership, LP, to lease any assisted-living properties we acquire and to operate the assisted-living properties pursuant to contracts with unaffiliated management companies. Master TRS and the Company have made the applicable election for Master TRS to qualify as a TRS. Under the management contracts, the management companies will have direct control of the daily operations of these assisted-living properties.
2. Public Offering
On November 14, 2006, Terry G. Roussel purchased 100 shares of common stock for $1,000 and became our initial stockholder. Our charter authorizes the issuance of up to 580,000,000 shares of common stock with a par value of $0.01 per share and 20,000,000 shares of preferred stock with a par value of $0.01 per share.
On June 20, 2008, we commenced an initial public offering of up to 50,000,000 shares of our common stock, consisting of 40,000,000 shares for sale pursuant to a primary offering and 10,000,000 shares for sale pursuant to our distribution reinvestment plan. We stopped making offers under our initial public offering on February 3, 2011 after raising gross offering proceeds of approximately $123.9 million from the sale of approximately 12.4 million shares, including shares sold under the distribution reinvestment plan.
On February 4, 2011, the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) declared the registration statement for our follow-on offering effective and we commenced a follow-on offering of up to 55,000,000 shares of our common stock, consisting of 44,000,000 shares for sale pursuant to a primary offering and 11,000,000 shares for sale pursuant to our dividend reinvestment plan.
As of March 31, 2011, we had sold a total of approximately 12.5 million shares of our common stock for aggregate gross proceeds of approximately $124.5 million. We intend to use the net proceeds of our offerings to invest in real estate including healthcare, multi-tenant industrial, net-leased retail properties and other real estate investments where we believe there are opportunities to enhance cash flow and value.

7


Table of Contents

On April 29, 2011 we informed our stockholders that our Independent Directors Committee had directed us to suspend our follow-on offering, our dividend reinvestment program and our stock repurchase program (except repurchases due to death) because of the uncertainty associated with our Independent Directors Committee consideration of various strategic alternatives to enhance our stockholders’ value. One of the alternatives under consideration is the hiring of a new dealer manager for our follow-on offering; however, the Independent Directors Committee has made no determination regarding whether or when our follow-on offering may be recommenced. In addition, the Independent Directors Committee is continuing to evaluate possible changes to our advisory relationships.
3. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
For more information regarding our critical accounting policies and estimates, please refer to “Summary of Significant Accounting Policies” contained in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of our financial statements requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses. We base these estimates on various assumptions that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances, and these estimates form the basis for our judgments concerning the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. We periodically evaluate these estimates and judgments based on available information and experience. Actual results could differ from our estimates under different assumptions and conditions. If actual results significantly differ from our estimates, our financial condition and results of operations could be materially impacted.
Interim Financial Information
The accompanying interim condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared by our management in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) and in conjunction with the rules and regulations of the SEC. Certain information and note disclosures required for annual financial statements have been condensed or excluded pursuant to SEC rules and regulations. Accordingly, the interim condensed consolidated financial statements do not include all of the information and notes required by GAAP for complete financial statements. The accompanying financial information reflects all adjustments which are, in the opinion of our management, of a normal recurring nature and necessary for a fair presentation of our financial position, results of operations and cash flows for the interim periods. Operating results for the three months ended March 31, 2011 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending December 31, 2011. Our accompanying interim condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with our audited condensed consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto included on our 2010 Annual Report on Form 10-K, as filed with the SEC.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) FASB ASC 825-10, “Financial Instruments”, requires the disclosure of fair value information about financial instruments, whether or not recognized on the face of the balance sheet, for which it is practical to estimate that value.
We generally determine or calculate the fair value of financial instruments using quoted market prices in active markets when such information is available or using appropriate present value or other valuation techniques, such as discounted cash flow analyses, incorporating available market discount rate information for similar types of instruments and our estimates for non-performance and liquidity risk. These techniques are significantly affected by the assumptions used, including the discount rate, credit spreads, and estimates of future cash flow.
Our balance sheets include the following financial instruments: cash and cash equivalents, tenant and other receivables, restricted cash, deferred costs and other assets, prepaid rent and security deposits, accounts payable and accrued liabilities, distributions payable, and notes payable. With the exception of notes payable discussed below, we consider the carrying values of our financial instruments to approximate fair value because of the short period of time between origination of the instruments and their expected payment.
The fair value of notes payable is estimated using lending rates available to us for financial instruments with similar terms and maturities. As of March 31, 2011 and 2010, the fair value of notes payable was approximately $91.9 million and $20.2 million, compared to the carrying value of approximately $90.9 million and $20.2 million, respectively.

8


Table of Contents

4. Investment in Real Estate
The following table provides summary information regarding our current property portfolio.
                                             
                                March 31,     March 31,  
        Date     Gross Square     Purchase     2011     2011  
Property   Location   Purchased     Feet     Price     Debt     % Occupancy  
Caruth Haven Court
  Highland Park, TX     01/22/09       74,647     $ 20,500,000     $ 9,875,000       95.60 %
The Oaks Bradenton
  Bradenton, FL     05/01/09       18,172     $ 4,500,000     $ 2,728,000       100.00 %
GreenTree at Westwood (1)
  Columbus, IN     12/30/09       50,249     $ 5,150,000     $ 2,832,000       94.83 %
Mesa Vista Inn Health Center
  San Antonio, TX     12/31/09       55,525     $ 13,000,000     $ 7,282,000       100.00 %
Rome LTACH Project
  Rome, GA     01/12/10       53,000       (2 )   $ 10,122,000       100.00 %
Oakleaf Village Portfolio
                              $ 17,794,000          
Oakleaf Village at — Lexington
  Lexington, SC     04/30/10       67,000     $ 14,512,000     $       86.20 %
Oakleaf Village at — Greenville
  Greer, SC     04/30/10       65,000     $ 12,488,000     $       73.10 %
Global Rehab Inpatient Rehab Facility
  Dallas, TX     08/19/10       40,000     $ 14,800,000     $ 7,506,000       100.00 %
Terrace at Mountain Creek (3)
  Chattanooga, TN     09/03/10       109,643     $ 8,500,000     $ 5,700,000       88.89 %
Littleton Specialty Rehabilitation Facility
  Littleton, CO     12/16/10       26,808 (4)     (5 )   $ 1,000        
Carriage Court of Hilliard
  Hilliard, OH     12/22/10       69,184     $ 17,500,000     $ 13,550,000       80.95 %
Hedgcoxe Health Plaza
  Plano, TX     12/22/10       32,109     $ 9,094,000     $ 5,060,000       94.90 %
River’s Edge of Yardley
  Yardley, PA     12/22/10       26,146     $ 4,500,000     $ 2,500,000       97.96 %
Forestview Manor
  Meredith, NH     01/14/11       34,270     $ 10,750,000     $ 5,935,000       92.00 %
 
(1)   The earn-out agreement associated with this acquisition was estimated to have a fair value of $0.7 million and $0.4 million as of March 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively. For the three months ended March 31, 2011, the expense of approximately $0.3 million related to the increased liability has been included in the condensed consolidated statements of operations under real estate acquisition costs and earn out costs.
 
(2)   Rome LTACH Project was completed in February 2011 and its first tenant moved in on February 1, 2011. As of March 31, 2011 we had recorded approximately $16.1 million in real estate assets. For the three months ended March 31, 2011, the expense related to the promote feature was approximately $0.2 million, which has been included in the condensed consolidated statements of operations under real estate acquisition costs and earn out costs.
 
(3)   The earn-out agreement associated with this acquisition was estimated to have a fair value of $1.0 million as of March 31, 2011. During the first quarter of 2011, we received the earn-out request from seller and we expect to pay the earn-out in the amount of $1.0 million during the second quarter of 2011.
 
(4)   Represents estimated gross square footage upon completion of development.
 
(5)   As of March 31, 2011, a total of approximately $0.8 million of equity had been invested in this project.
As of March 31, 2011, cost and accumulated depreciation and amortization related to real estate assets and related lease intangibles were as follows:
                                         
                            Development        
                            costs and        
            Buildings and     Furniture, fixtures     construction in     Intangible lease  
    Land     improvements     and equipment     progress     assets  
Cost
  $ 20,269,000     $ 112,025,000     $ 3,140,000     $ 288,000     $ 11,937,000  
Accumulated depreciation and amortization
          (2,557,000 )     (523,000 )           (4,219,000 )
 
                             
Net
  $ 20,269,000     $ 109,468,000     $ 2,617,000     $ 288,000     $ 7,718,000  
 
                             
As of December 31, 2010, accumulated depreciation and amortization related to investments in real estate and related lease intangibles were as follows:
                                         
                            Development        
                            costs and        
            Buildings and     Furniture, fixtures     construction in     Intangible lease  
    Land     improvements     and equipment     progress     assets  
Cost
  $ 18,949,000     $ 89,719,000     $ 2,780,000     $ 13,669,000     $ 9,187,000  
Accumulated depreciation and amortization
          (1,786,000 )     (370,000 )           (3,280,000 )
 
                             
Net
  $ 18,949,000     $ 87,933,000     $ 2,410,000     $ 13,669,000     $ 5,907,000  
 
                             

9


Table of Contents

Depreciation expense associated with buildings and improvements, site improvements and furniture and fixtures for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010 was approximately $0.9 million and $0.2 million, respectively.
Amortization associated with the intangible assets for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010 was $0.9 million and $0.4 million, respectively.
Estimated amortization for April 1, 2011 through December 31, 2011 and each of the subsequent years is as follows:
         
    Intangible  
    assets  
April 2011 — December 2011
  $ 1,845,000  
2012
  $ 836,000  
2013
  $ 468,000  
2014
  $ 408,000  
2015
  $ 408,000  
2016
  $ 408,000  
2017 and thereafter
  $ 3,345,000  
The estimated useful lives for intangible assets range from approximately one to twenty years. As of March 31, 2011, the weighted-average amortization period for intangible assets was 7.0 years.
5. Investments in Joint Ventures
Oakleaf Joint Venture
On April 30, 2010, we invested approximately $21.6 million to acquire 80% equity interests in Royal Cornerstone South Carolina Portfolio, LLC (“Portfolio LLC”) and Royal Cornerstone South Carolina Tenant Portfolio, LLC (“Tenant LLC”) (collectively, we refer to the Portfolio LLC and the Tenant LLC as the “Oakleaf Joint Venture”). The Oakleaf Joint Venture owns and operates two assisted-living properties located in Lexington and Greenville, South Carolina. As of March 31, 2011, total net assets related to Oakleaf Joint Venture were approximately $26.8 million, which includes approximately $25.3 million of real estate assets and total liabilities were approximately $18.3 million, which includes an approximately $17.8 million of secured mortgage debt. We may be required to fund additional capital contributions, including funding of any capital expenditures deemed necessary to continue to operate the entity, and any operating cash shortfalls that the entity may experience.
Rome LTACH Project
On January 12, 2010, we funded an investment in a joint venture with affiliates of The Cirrus Group, an unaffiliated entity, to develop a $16.3 million free-standing medical facility on the campus of the Floyd Medical Center in Rome, Georgia. We contributed approximately $2.7 million of capital to acquire a 75.0% limited partnership interest in Rome LTH Partners, LP. Cornerstone Private Equity Fund Operating Partnership, LP, an affiliate of our sponsor, contributed approximately $0.5 million of capital to acquire a 15.0% limited partnership interest in Rome LTH Partners, LP. Three affiliates of The Cirrus Group contributed an aggregate of approximately $0.3 million to acquire an aggregate 9.5% limited partnership interest in the Rome LTH Partners, LP. A fourth affiliate of the Cirrus Group acts as the general partner and holds the remaining 0.5% interest in the Rome LTH Partners LP. As of both March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, we owned a 75.0% of limited partnership interest in Rome LTH Partners, LP.
Under the terms of this joint venture, we may be obligated to monetize a portion of our partners’ interest in the appreciation of value in the joint venture property. These obligations may be exercised by our partners at their sole discretion between years two and four of the joint ventures. At March 31, 2011, the construction of the free-standing medical facility on the campus of the Floyd Medical Center in Rome, Georgia was completed. As of March 31, 2011, we believe that payments under these obligations are probable; accordingly, we have recorded approximately $2.2 million with respect to the monetization feature which had been included in accounts payable and accrued liabilities on our condensed consolidated balance sheet. The amount to be paid upon monetization is based on a number of factors, including the value of the property, net income earned by the property and payment of preferred returns on equity. Of the $2.2 million, we capitalized approximately $1.8 million and $0.2 million incurred during the construction period which are included in the intangible lease assets and building and improvements, respectively, of our condensed consolidated balance sheet and expensed post construction period approximately $0.2 million which had been included in real estate acquisition costs and earn out costs of our condensed consolidated statement of operations. We determined the fair value of this obligation using discounted cash flow analysis, incorporating market discount rate information for similar types of obligations, projected net income earned by the property and preferred return payments. As of March 31, 2011, total assets related to this project were approximately

10


Table of Contents

$16.6 million, which includes approximately $16.1 million of real estate assets and total liabilities were approximately $13.2 million, which includes an approximately $10.1 million of secured mortgage debt.
ASC 820-10 establishes a three-tiered fair value hierarchy that prioritizes valuation technique input. Level 1 inputs (“observable inputs”) are quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities and are given the highest priority. Level 2 inputs (“other observable input”) are either observable directly or through corroborative with observable market data. Level 3 inputs (“unobservable inputs”) are unobservable in the market, such as internally developed valuation models. As of December 31, 2010, we had not recorded a liability with respect to the monetization feature of this joint venture. As of March 31, 2011, we measured the payments with respect to the monetization feature at approximately $2.2 million on a recurring basis using Level 3 inputs.
Littleton Specialty Rehabilitation Facility
On December 16, 2010, we funded an investment in a joint venture with affiliates of The Cirrus Group, an unaffiliated entity, to develop a $7.3 million specialty rehabilitation facility in Littleton, CO. We agreed to contribute approximately $1.6 million of capital to acquire a 90% limited partnership interest in Littleton Med Partners, LP. Three affiliates of The Cirrus Group contributed an aggregate of approximately $0.2 million to acquire an aggregate 9.5% limited partnership interest in the Littleton Med Partners, LP. A fourth affiliate of the Cirrus Group acts as the general partner and holds the remaining 0.5% interest in the Littleton Med Partners, LP. As of both March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, we owned a 90.0% of limited partnership interest in Littleton Med Partners, LP.
Under the terms of this joint venture, we may be obligated to monetize a portion of our partners’ interest in the appreciation of value in the joint venture property. These obligations may be exercised by our partners at their sole discretion between years two and four of the joint ventures. The amount that would be paid upon monetization is subject to change based on a number of factors, including the value of the property, net income earned by the property and payment of preferred returns on equities. At March 31, 2011, the specialty rehabilitation facility in Littleton, CO has not started construction and we have determined that sufficient uncertainty exists with respect to exercise of the monetization features that the probability of payment under the monetization obligation is not determinable; accordingly, we have not recognized the obligation in our March 31, 2011 condensed consolidated financial statements. As of the date of this report, the amount of contingent liability with respect to the monetization feature with regards to the development in Littleton, CO is inestimable.
6. Allowance for Doubtful Accounts
As of both March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, we had recorded $35,000 as an allowance for tenants and other receivables doubtful accounts and have fully reserved for a receivable from related parties.
7. Concentration of Risks
Financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to a concentration of credit risk are primarily cash investments; cash is generally invested in investment-grade short-term instruments. On July 21, 2010, President Obama signed into law the “Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act” that includes provisions that made permanent the $250,000 limit for federal deposit insurance and increase the cash limit of Securities Investor Protection Corporation protection from $100,000 to $250,000, and provide unlimited federal deposit insurance until January 1, 2013 for non-interest bearing demand transaction accounts at all insured depository institutions. As of March 31, 2011, we had cash accounts in excess of Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation insured limits. We believe this risk is not significant.
Concentrations of credit risks arise when a number of operators, tenants or obligors related to our investments are engaged in similar business activities, or activities in the same geographic region, or have similar economic features that would cause their ability to meet contractual obligations, including those to the Company, to be similarly affected by changes in economic conditions. We regularly monitor various segments of our portfolio to assess potential concentrations of risks. Management believes the current portfolio is reasonably diversified across healthcare related real estate and does not contain any other significant concentration of credit risks, except as disclosed herein.
Our senior living operations segment accounted for approximately 83.6% and 84.0% of total revenues for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively. The following table provides information about our senior living operation segment concentration for the three months ended March 31, 2011:

11


Table of Contents

                 
    Percentage of     Percentage of  
Operators   Segment Revenues     Total Revenues  
Good Neighbor Care
    24.6 %     20.6 %
Royal Senior Care
    21.6 %     18.0 %
Woodbine Senior Living
    21.4 %     17.9 %
12 Oaks Senior Living
    21.1 %     17.6 %
Provision Living
    5.9 %     5.0 %
Legend Senior Living
    5.4 %     4.5 %
 
           
 
    100.0 %     83.6 %
Our triple-net leased segment accounted for approximately 13.7% and 16.0% of total revenues for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively. The following table provides information about our triple-net leased segment for the year ended March 31, 2011:
                 
    Percentage of     Percentage of  
Tenant   Segment Revenues     Total Revenues  
Babcock PM Management
    37.4 %     5.1 %
Global Rehab Hospitals
    32.7 %     4.5 %
The Specialty Hospital
    27.1 %     3.7 %
Floyd Healthcare Management
    2.8 %     0.4 %
 
           
 
    100.0 %     13.7 %
Our medical office building segment accounted for approximately 2.7% and 0% of total revenues for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively.
As of March 31, 2011, we owned 14 properties, geographically located in ten states. The following table provides information about our geographic risks by operating segment for the three months ended March 31, 2011:
                 
    Percentage of     Percentage of  
State   Segment Revenues     Total Revenues  
Senior living operations
               
South Carolina
    21.6 %     18.0 %
Texas
    21.1 %     17.6 %
Ohio
    14.3 %     12.0 %
Pennsylvania
    10.9 %     9.1 %
New Hampshire
    10.5 %     8.8 %
Tennessee
    10.3 %     8.6 %
Indiana
    5.9 %     5.0 %
Florida
    5.4 %     4.5 %
 
               
Triple net leased properties
               
Texas
    70.1 %     9.6 %
Georgia
    29.9 %     4.1 %
Colorado (1)
    %     %
 
               
Medical office building
               
Texas
    100.0 %     2.7 %
 
(1)   Under construction as of March 31, 2011
8. Income Taxes
For federal income tax purposes, we have elected to be taxed as a REIT, under Sections 856 through 860 of the Code beginning with our taxable year ended December 31, 2008, which imposes limitations related to operating assisted-living properties. As of March 31, 2011, we had acquired nine assisted-living facilities and formed nine wholly owned taxable REIT subsidiaries, or TRSs, which includes a Master TRS that consolidates our wholly owned TRSs.

12


Table of Contents

Each TRS is a tax paying component for purposes of classifying deferred tax assets and liabilities. We record net deferred tax assets to the extent we believe these assets will more likely than not be realized. In making such determination, we consider all available positive and negative evidence, including future reversals of existing taxable temporary differences, projected future taxable income, tax planning strategies and recent financial operations. In the event we were to determine that we would not be able to realize our deferred income tax assets in the future in excess of their net recorded amount, we would establish a valuation allowance which would reduce the provision for income taxes.
The consolidated income tax benefit for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010 was approximately $0.2 million and $0 million, respectively, which has been included in general and administrative expenses of our condensed consolidated financial statements,. Realization of a deferred tax benefit is dependent in part upon generating sufficient taxable income in future periods. Our net operating loss carryforwards were utilized in 2010 with respect to the TRS entities. Net deferred tax assets related to the TRS entities totaled approximately $0.6 million and $0 million at March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively, related primarily to book and tax basis differences for straight-line rent and accrued liabilities. These deferred tax assets are included in deferred costs and other assets of our condensed consolidated balance sheets.
9. Payable to Related Parties
Payable to related parties at March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010 was $1,000 and $65,000, respectively, which consists of offering costs, acquisition fees, expense reimbursement payable, sales commissions and dealer manager fees to our Advisor and PCC.
10. Segment Reporting
As of March 31, 2011, we operated in three reportable business segments: senior living operations, triple-net leased properties, and medical office building (“MOB”) properties. Our senior living operations segment primarily consists of investments in senior housing communities located in the United States for which we engage independent third-party managers. Our triple-net leased properties segment consists of investments in skilled nursing and hospital facilities in the United States. These facilities are leased to healthcare operating companies under long-term “triple-net” or “absolute-net” leases, which require the tenants to pay all property-related expenses. Our medical office building operations segment primarily consists of investing in medical office buildings and leasing those properties to healthcare providers under long-term leases, which may require tenants to pay property-related expenses.
On December 22, 2010, we completed the purchase of Hedgcoxe Health Plaza, a multi-tenant medical office building in Plano, TX. With the addition of Hedgcoxe Health Plaza, we determined that segregating our MOB operations into its own reporting segment would be useful in assessing the performance of this portion of our business as a business segment consistent with management’s focus in assessing performance and operating decisions. Prior to the Hedgcoxe Health Plaza acquisition, we operated in two reportable segments: senior living operations and triple-net leased properties.
We evaluate performance of the combined properties in each segment based on net operating income. Net operating income is defined as total revenue less property operating and maintenance expenses. There are no intersegment sales or transfers. We use net operating income to evaluate the operating performance of our real estate investments and to make decisions concerning the operation of the property. We believe that net operating income is useful to investors in understanding the value of income-producing real estate. Net income is the GAAP measure that is most directly comparable to net operating income; however, net operating income should not be considered as an alternative to net income as the primary indicator of operating performance as it excludes certain items such as depreciation and amortization, asset management fees and expenses, real estate acquisition costs, interest expense and corporate general and administrative expenses. Additionally, net operating income as we define it may not be comparable to net operating income as defined by other REITs or companies.

13


Table of Contents

The following tables reconcile the segment activity to consolidated net income for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010:
                                 
    For the three months ended March 31, 2011  
    Senior living     Triple-net leased     Medical office        
    operations     properties     building     Consolidated  
Rental revenues
  $ 6,200,000     $ 1,159,000     $ 201,000     $ 7,560,000  
Resident services and fee income
    1,702,000                   1,702,000  
Tenant reimbursements and other income
    110,000       158,000       55,000       323,000  
 
                       
 
  $ 8,012,000     $ 1,317,000     $ 256,000     $ 9,585,000  
Property operating and maintenance expenses
    5,445,000       173,000       70,000       5,688,000  
 
                       
Net operating income
  $ 2,567,000     $ 1,144,000     $ 186,000     $ 3,897,000  
 
                       
General and administrative expenses
                            664,000  
Asset management fees and expenses
                            431,000  
Real estate acquisition costs and earn out costs
                            1,127,000  
Depreciation and amortization
                            1,861,000  
Interest income
                            (4,000 )
Interest expense
                            1,476,000  
 
                             
Net loss
                          $ (1,658,000 )
Net loss attributable to the noncontrolling interests
                            (65,000 )
 
                             
Net loss attributable to common stockholders
                          $ (1,593,000 )
 
                             
                                 
    For the three months ended March 31, 2010  
    Senior living     Triple-net leased     Medical office        
    operations     properties     building     Consolidated  
Rental revenues
  $ 1,990,000     $ 447,000     $     $ 2,437,000  
Resident services and fee income
    495,000                   495,000  
Tenant reimbursements and other income
    70,000       40,000             110,000  
 
                       
 
  $ 2,555,000     $ 487,000     $     $ 3,042,000  
Property operating and maintenance expenses
    1,820,000       40,000             1,860,000  
 
                       
Net operating income
  $ 735,000     $ 447,000     $     $ 1,182,000  
 
                       
General and administrative expenses
                            528,000  
Asset management fees and expenses
                            165,000  
Real estate acquisition costs and earn out costs
                            458,000  
Depreciation and amortization
                            640,000  
Interest income
                            (3,000 )
Interest expense
                            337,000  
 
                             
Net loss
                          $ (943,000 )
Net income attributable to the noncontrolling interests
                            4,000  
 
                             
Net loss attributable to common stockholders
                          $ (947,000 )
 
                             
The following table reconciles the segment activity to consolidated financial position as of March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010.
                 
    March 31, 2011     December 31, 2010  
Assets
               
Investment in real estate:
               
Senior living operations
  $ 87,811,000     $ 78,722,000  
Triple-net leased properties
    43,911,000       41,433,000  
Medical office building
    8,638,000       8,713,000  
 
           
Total reportable segments
  $ 140,360,000     $ 128,868,000  
Reconciliation to consolidated assets:
               
Cash and cash equivalents
    37,937,000       29,819,000  
Deferred financing costs, net
    1,266,000       1,382,000  
Tenant and other receivables, net
    1,629,000       1,462,000  
Deferred costs and other assets
    1,562,000       554,000  
Restricted cash
    2,824,000       2,942,000  
Goodwill
    5,606,000       5,329,000  
 
           
Total assets
  $ 191,184,000     $ 170,356,000  
 
           

14


Table of Contents

As of March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, goodwill had a balance of approximately $5.6 million and $5.3 million, respectively, all related to senior living operations segment. During the first quarter of 2011, due to an acquisition in our senior living operations segment, we recorded approximately $0.3 million of goodwill.
11. Notes Payable
Notes payable were approximately $90.9 million and $80.8 million as of March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively. As of March 31, 2011, we had fixed and variable rate secured mortgage loans with effective interest rates ranging from 2.5% to 6.5% per annum and a weighted average effective interest rate of 6.08% per annum. As of March 31, 2011, we had $40.6 million of fixed rate debt, or approximately 45% of notes payable, at a weighted average interest rate of 4.90% per annum and $50.3 million of variable rate debt, or approximately 55% of notes payable, at a weighted average interest rate of 5.99% per annum. As of December 31, 2010, we had fixed and variable rate mortgage loans with effective interest rates ranging from 2.50% to 6.50% per annum and a weighted average effective interest rate of 6.09% per annum.
We are required by the terms of the applicable loan documents to meet certain financial covenants, such as debt service coverage ratios, rent coverage ratios and reporting requirements. As of March 31, 2011, we were in compliance with all such covenants and requirements.
                                     
                    Outstanding     Outstanding      
                    Principal Balance     Principal Balance      
            Interest   as of March 31,     as of December 31,      
Property Name   Payment Type   Rate   2011(1)     2010(1)     Maturity Date
Carriage Court of Hilliard
  Principal and interest at a 35-year amortization rate   5.40% — fixed   $ 13,550,000     $ 13,586,000     August 1, 2044
Caruth Haven Court
  Principal and interest at a 30-year amortization rate   6.43% — fixed   $ 9,875,000     $ 9,904,000     December 16, 2019
Greentree
  Interest Only   30-day LIBOR +4.00% with a 2% LIBOR floor   $ 2,832,000           November 18, 2012
Forestview Manor
  Interest Only   30-day LIBOR +4.00% with a 2% LIBOR floor   $ 5,935,000           November 18, 2012
Global Rehab Inpatient Rehab Facility
  Principal and interest at a 30-year amortization rate   6.25% — fixed for 3 years; thereafter the greater of 6.25% and 3yr LIBOR + 3.25%   $ 7,506,000     $ 7,530,000     December 22, 2016
Hedgcoxe Health Plaza
  Interest Only   30-day LIBOR +4.00% with a 2% LIBOR floor   $ 5,060,000     $ 5,060,000     November 18, 2012
Mesa Vista Inn Health Center
  Principal and interest at a 20-year amortization rate   6.50% — fixed   $ 7,282,000     $ 7,336,000     January 5, 2015
Oakleaf Village Portfolio
  (2)   (2)   $ 17,794,000     $ 17,849,000     April 30, 2015
Oakleaf Village at Lexington
                 
Oakleaf Village at Greenville
                 
River’s Edge of Yardley
  Interest Only   30-day LIBOR +4.00% with a 2% LIBOR floor   $ 2,500,000     $ 2,500,000     November 18, 2012
Rome LTACH Project (3)
  Month 1-24 Interest-only Month 25 on Principal and interest at a 25-year amortization rate   1Mo LIBOR + 3.00% with a 6.15% floor   $ 10,122,000     $ 8,588,000     December 18, 2012
Littleton Specialty Rehabilitation
Facility (4)
  Month 1-18 Interest-only Month 19 on Principal and interest at a 20-year amortization rate   6.0% fixed   $ 1,000     $ 1,000     December 22, 2015
The Oaks Bradenton
  (5)   (5)   $ 2,728,000     $ 2,738,000     May 1, 2014
Terrace at Mountain Creek
  Month 1-24 interest only. Month 25 to 36 Principal and interests at a 25-year amortization rate   3Mo LIBOR + 3.50% with a 5.5% floor   $ 5,700,000     $ 5,700,000     September 1, 2013
 
                               
 
                  $ 90,885,000     $ 80,792,000      
 
                               

15


Table of Contents

 
(1)   As of March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, all notes payable are secured by the underlying real estate.
 
(2)   The aggregate loan amount is composed of a restatement date balance of approximately $12.9 million outstanding with respect to a prior loan (the “Initial Loan”), and an additional amount of approximately $5.1 million disbursed on the closing date (the “Restatement Date Loan”). From June 1, 2010 through the maturity date, payments on the Restatement Date Loan are due monthly and based upon a 30-year amortization schedule. From June 1, 2010 through January 10, 2011, payments on the Initial Loan were due monthly based upon a 25-year amortization schedule, thereafter through maturity, payments on the Initial Loan are due monthly based upon a 30-year amortization schedule. The Restatement Date Loan bears interest at a variable rate equal to 5.45% per annum plus the greater of 1.0% or the 3-month LIBOR rate (the “Contract Rate”). The outstanding balance of the Initial Loan bore interest at a rate of 6.62% per annum until January 10, 2011 and thereafter bears interest at the Contract Rate. In connection with our Oakleaf Village Portfolio financing, we incurred financing costs of $3,000 for the year ended December 31, 2010.
 
(3)   For the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010 we had incurred approximately $0.1 million and $0 of interest expense related to the Rome LTACH Project. For the three months ended March 31, 2010, interest expense and deferred financing fees of $19,000 and $5,000, respectively, were capitalized.
 
(4)   For the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010 we had not incurred any interest expense related to the Littleton Specialty Rehabilitation Facility. For the three months ended March 31, 2010, deferred financing fees of $8,000 was capitalized.
 
(5)   Of the total loan amount, $2.4 million bears a fixed interest rate of 6.25% per annum. The remaining $0.4 million bears a variable interest rate equivalent to the prevailing market certificate of deposit rate plus a 1.5% margin. Monthly payments for the first twelve months will be interest-only. Monthly payments beginning the thirteenth month will include interest and principal based on a 25-year amortization period.
In November 2010, we entered into an agreement with KeyBank National Association, an unaffiliated financial institution, to obtain a $25,000,000 revolving credit facility. The credit facility may be increased in the future in incremental amounts of at least $25.0 million at our request subject to attaining certain portfolio size targets. The initial term of the credit facility is 24 months, maturing on November 18, 2012, and may be extended by six months subject to satisfaction of certain conditions, including payment of an extension fee. The actual amount of credit available under the credit facility is a function of certain loan to cost, loan to value and debt service coverage ratios contained in the credit facility. The credit facility will be secured by first priority liens on our eligible real property assets that make up the borrowing base (as such term is defined) for the credit facility. The interest rate for this credit facility is one-month LIBOR plus a margin of 400 basis points, with a floor of 200 basis points for one-month LIBOR. The credit facility also requires payment of a fee of up to 25 basis points related to unused credit available to us under the credit facility. We are entitled to prepay the obligations at any time without penalty. The facility includes a financial covenant requiring us to raise at least $20 million in our public offering in the six-month period ending June 30, 2011, and to raise an additional $20 million in net offering proceeds during each six-month calendar period thereafter. Because we suspended our public offering on April 29, 2011, we will be not be able to satisfy this covenant; however, we expect to negotiate a waiver of the covenant with the lender or to pay off the outstanding balance under the credit facility using currently available cash. As of March 31, 2011, the credit facility had a balance of approximately $16.3 million and we were in compliance with the covenants of the credit agreement.
The principal payments due on our notes payable for April 1, 2011 to December 31, 2011 and each of the subsequent years is as follows:
         
    Principal  
Year   amount  
April 1, 2011 to December 31, 2011
  $ 588,000  
2012
  $ 27,298,000  
2013
  $ 6,572000  
2014
  $ 3,499,000  
2015
  $ 23,852,000  
2016 and thereafter
  $ 29,076,000  
Interest Expense and Deferred Financing Cost
The following table sets forth our gross interest expense and deferred financing cost amortization for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010. The capitalized amount is a cost of development and increases the carrying value of construction in progress.

16


Table of Contents

                 
    Three Months Ended  
    March 31,  
    2011     2010  
Gross interest expense and deferred financing cost amortization
  $ 1,508,000     $ 370,000  
Capitalized interest expense and deferred financing cost amortization
    (32,000 )     (33,000 )
 
           
Interest expense
  $ 1,476,000     $ 337,000  
 
           
As of March 31,2011 and December 31, 2010, our net deferred financing costs were approximately $1.3 million and $1.4 million, respectively. All deferred amortized financing costs are capitalized and amortized over the life of the agreements.
12. Stockholders’ Equity
Common Stock
Our charter authorizes the issuance of 580,000,000 shares of common stock with a par value of $0.01 per share and 20,000,000 shares of preferred stock with a par value of $0.01 per share. As of March 31, 2011, including distributions reinvested, we had issued approximately 13.0 million shares of common stock for a total of approximately $129.3 million of gross proceeds in our initial and follow-on public offering. As of March 31, 2010, including distributions reinvested, we had issued approximately 6.4 million shares of common stock for total gross proceeds of approximately $64.0 million in our initial public offering.
Distributions
We have adopted a distribution reinvestment plan that allows our stockholders to have dividends and other distributions otherwise distributable to them invested in additional shares of our common stock at their election. We have registered 10,000,000 shares of our common stock for sale pursuant to the distribution reinvestment plan. The purchase price per share is 95% of the price paid by the purchaser for our common stock, but not less than $9.50 per share. As of March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, approximately 509,000 and 394,000 shares, respectively, had been issued under the distribution reinvestment plan.
On April 29, 2011, we informed our stockholders that our Independent Directors Committee had directed us to suspend our offering, our dividend reinvestment plan and our stock repurchase program (except repurchases due to death) because of the uncertainty associated with our Independent Directors Committee consideration of various strategic alternatives to enhance our stockholders’ value. As a result, we suspended our distribution reinvestment plan effective as of May 10, 2011.
The following are the distributions declared during the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010:
                         
    Distribution Declared  
Period   Cash     Reinvested     Total  
First quarter 2010 (1)
  $ 525,000     $ 506,000     $ 1,031,000  
 
                       
First quarter 2011
  $ 1,152,000     $ 1,124,000     $ 2,276,000  
 
(1)   Distributions declared represented a return of capital for tax purposes. In order to meet the requirements for being treated as a REIT under the Internal Revenue Code, we must pay distributions to our stockholders each taxable year equal to at least 90% of our net ordinary taxable income. Some of our distributions have been paid from sources other than operating cash flow, such as offering proceeds. Until proceeds from our offering are fully invested and generating operating cash flow sufficient to fully cover distributions to stockholders, we intend to pay all or a portion of our distributions from the proceeds of our offering or from borrowings in anticipation of future cash flow.
The declaration of distributions is at the discretion of our board of directors and our board will determine the amount of distributions on a regular basis. The amount of distributions will depend on our funds from operations, financial condition, capital requirements, annual distribution requirements under the REIT provisions of the Internal Revenue Code and other factors our board of directors deems relevant.

17


Table of Contents

From our inception in October 2006 through March 31, 2011, we declared aggregate distributions of $10.5 million and our cumulative net loss during the same period was $13.3 million.
Stock Repurchase Program
We adopted a stock repurchase program for investors who have held their shares for at least one year, unless the shares are being repurchased in connection with a stockholder’s death. Under our stock repurchase program, the repurchase price varies depending on the purchase price paid by the stockholder and the number of years the shares are held. Our board of directors may amend, suspend or terminate the program at any time on 30 days prior notice to stockholders. We have no obligation to repurchase our stockholders’ shares. Our board of directors waived the one-year holding period in the event of the death of a stockholder and adjusted the repurchase price to 100% of such stockholders purchase price if the stockholder held the shares for less than three years. Our board of directors reserves the right in its sole discretion at any time and from time to time, upon 30 days prior notice to our stockholders, to adjust the repurchase price for our shares of stock, or suspend or terminate our stock repurchase program.
During the three months ended March 31, 2011, we repurchased shares pursuant to our stock repurchase program as follows:
                 
    Total Number     Average  
    of Shares     Price Paid  
Period   Redeemed     per Share  
January
    1,194     $ 9.88  
February
    17,379     $ 9.42  
March
    25,217     $ 9.29  
 
             
 
    43,790          
 
             
During the three months ended March 31, 2010, we repurchased 10,209 shares pursuant to our stock repurchase program.
During the three months ended March 31, 2011, we received requests to have an aggregate of 89,261 shares repurchased pursuant to our stock repurchase program. Of these requests 1,525 shares were not able to be repurchased due to the limitations contained in the terms of our stock repurchase program.
Our board of directors may modify our stock repurchase program so that we can repurchase stock using the proceeds from the sale of our real estate investments or other sources. On April 29, 2011, we informed our stockholders that our Independent Directors Committee had directed us to suspend our offering, our dividend reinvestment program and our stock repurchase program (except repurchases due to death) because of the uncertainty associated with our Independent Directors Committee consideration of various strategic alternatives to enhance our stockholder value. As a result, we suspended our stock repurchase program effective as of May 29, 2011.
13. Related Party Transactions
The Company has no employees. Our Advisor is primarily responsible for managing our business affairs and carrying out the policies established by our board of directors. We have an advisory agreement with the Advisor and dealer manager agreements with Pacific Cornerstone Capital, Inc. (“PCC”) related to our initial and follow-on public offerings, which entitle the Advisor and PCC to specified fees upon the provision of certain services to us, as well as reimbursement for organizational and offering costs incurred by the Advisor and PCC on our behalf and reimbursement of certain costs and expenses incurred by the Advisor in providing services to us.
Advisory Agreement
Under the terms of the advisory agreement, the Advisor is required to use commercially reasonable efforts to present to us investment opportunities to provide a continuing and suitable investment program consistent with the investment policies and objectives adopted by our board of directors. The advisory agreement calls for the Advisor to provide for our day-to-day management and to retain property managers and leasing agents, subject to the authority of our board of directors, and to perform other duties.
The fees and expense reimbursements payable to the Advisor under the advisory agreement are described below.

18


Table of Contents

Organizational and Offering Costs. Organizational and offering costs of our offerings paid by the Advisor on our behalf are being reimbursed to the Advisor from the proceeds of our offerings. Organizational and offering costs consist of all expenses (other than sales commissions and the dealer manager fee) to be paid by us in connection with our offerings, including our legal, accounting, printing, mailing and filing fees, charges of our escrow holder and other accountable offering expenses, including, but not limited to, (i) amounts to reimburse the Advisor for all marketing related costs and expenses such as salaries and direct expenses of employees of the Advisor and its affiliates in connection with registering and marketing our shares; (ii) technology costs associated with the offering of our shares; (iii) our costs of conducting our training and education meetings; (iv) our costs of attending retail seminars conducted by participating broker-dealers; and (v) payment or reimbursement of bona fide due diligence expenses. At times during our offering stage, the amount of organization and offering expenses that we incur, or that the Advisor and its affiliates incur on our behalf, may exceed 3.5% of the gross offering proceeds then raised, but our Advisor is required to reimburse us to the extent that our organization and offering expenses exceed 3.5% of aggregate gross offering proceeds at the conclusion of our offering. In addition, the Advisor will also pay any organization and offering expenses to the extent that such expenses, plus sales commissions and the dealer manager fee (but not the acquisition fees or expenses) are in excess of 13.5% of gross offering proceeds. In no event will we have any obligation to reimburse the Advisor for organizational and offering costs totaling in excess of 3.5% of the gross proceeds from our primary offerings. As of March 31, 2011, the Advisor and its affiliates had incurred organizational and offering costs totaling approximately $5.0 million, including approximately $0.1 million of organizational costs that have been expensed and approximately $4.9 million of offering costs that reduce net proceeds of our offerings. Of this amount $4.0 million reduced the net proceeds of our initial public offering and $0.9 million reduced the net proceeds of our follow-on offering. As of December 31, 2010, the advisor and its affiliates had incurred organizational and offering costs totaling approximately $4.6 million, including approximately $0.1 million of organizational costs that have been expensed and approximately $4.5 million of offering costs which reduce net proceeds of our offerings.
Acquisition Fees and Expenses. The advisory agreement requires us to pay the Advisor acquisition fees in an amount equal to 2.0% of the investments acquired, including any debt attributable to such investments. A portion of the acquisition fees will be paid upon receipt of offering proceeds, and the balance will be paid at the time we acquire a property. However, if the advisory agreement is terminated or not renewed, the Advisor must return acquisition fees not yet allocated to one of our investments. In addition, we are required to reimburse the Advisor for direct costs the Advisor incurs and amounts the Advisor pays to third parties in connection with the selection and acquisition of a property, whether or not ultimately acquired. For the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, the Advisor earned approximately $0.3 million and $0.4 million in acquisition fees, respectively. As of March 31, 2011, the amount of acquisition fees that have been paid to the advisor, but have not yet been allocated to one of our investments is $0.9 million, that have been expensed and included in real estate acquisition costs and earn out costs in our condensed consolidated statements of operations.
Management Fees. The advisory agreement requires us to pay the Advisor a monthly asset management fee of one-twelfth of 1.0% of the sum of the aggregate basis in book carrying values of our assets invested, directly or indirectly, in equity interests in and loans secured by real estate before reserves for depreciation or bad debts or other similar non-cash reserves, calculated in accordance with GAAP. In addition, we have historically reimbursed the Advisor for the direct and indirect costs and expenses incurred by the Advisor in providing asset management services to us, including personnel and related employment costs related to providing asset management services on our behalf and amounts paid by our Advisor to Servant Investments, LLC and Servant Healthcare Investments, LLC for portfolio management services provided on our behalf. These fees and expenses are in addition to management fees that we expect to pay to third party property managers. For the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, the Advisor earned approximately $0.4 million and $0.2 million of management fees, respectively, which were expensed. For the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, the Advisor incurred $172,000 and $55,000, respectively, of such direct and indirect costs and expenses, which are included in asset management fees and expenses in the condensed consolidated statement of operations.
Operating Expenses. The advisory agreement provides for reimbursement of the Advisor’s direct and indirect costs of providing administrative and management services to us. For the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, approximately $0.4 million and $0.2 million of such costs, respectively, were reimbursed and included in general and administrative expenses on our condensed consolidated statements of operations. Consistent with limitations set forth in our charter, the advisory agreement further provides that, commencing four fiscal quarters after the acquisition of our first real estate asset, we shall not reimburse the Advisor at the end of any fiscal quarter management fees and expenses and operating expenses that, in the four consecutive fiscal quarters then ended exceed (the “Excess Amount”) the greater of 2% of our average invested assets or 25% of our net income for such year (the “2%/25% Guidelines”) unless the Independent Directors Committee of our board of directors determines that such excess was justified, based on unusual and nonrecurring factors which it deems sufficient. If the Independent Directors Committee does not approve such excess as being so justified, the advisory agreement requires that any Excess Amount paid to the Advisor during a fiscal quarter shall be repaid to the Company. In addition, our charter provides that, if the Independent Directors Committee does not determine that the Excess Amount is justified, the Advisor shall reimburse us the amount by which the aggregate annual expenses paid to the Advisor during the four consecutive fiscal quarters then ended exceed the 2%/25% Guidelines. For the four quarters

19


Table of Contents

ended March 31, 2011, our management fees and expenses and operating expenses exceeded the greater of 2% of our average invested assets and 25% of our net income and our Independent Directors Committee has determined that $0.2 million of the Excess Amount was justified as unusual and non-recurring. The Excess Amount for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2011 was approximately $0.6 million. The Excess Amount for the four fiscal quarters ended March 31, 2011 was approximately $1.8 million. In accordance with our charter, the Independent Directors Committee instructed us to record a receivable from the Advisor for $1.6 million reflecting the Excess Amount for the four quarters ended March 31, 2011 less the amount determined by the Independent Directors Committee to be justified as unusual and non-recurring. Our March 31, 2011 financial statements include a receivable for this amount and a corresponding reserve for the full amount related to our evaluation of various factors related to collectability. The Advisor has informed us that it disputes the amount of this liability.
Disposition Fee. The advisory agreement provides that if the Advisor or its affiliate provides a substantial amount of the services (as determined by a majority of our directors, including a majority of our independent directors) in connection with the sale of one or more properties, we will pay the Advisor or such affiliate at closing a disposition fee up to 3% of the sales price of such property or properties. This disposition fee may be paid in addition to real estate commissions paid to non-affiliates, provided that the total real estate commissions (including such disposition fee) paid to all persons by us for each property shall not exceed an amount equal to the lesser of (i) 6% of the aggregate contract sales price of each property or (ii) the competitive real estate commission for each property. We will pay the disposition fees for a property at the time the property is sold.
Subordinated Participation Provisions. The Advisor is entitled to receive a subordinated participation upon the sale of our properties, listing of our common stock or termination of the Advisor, as follows:
    After we pay stockholders cumulative distributions equal to their invested capital plus a 6% cumulative, non-compounded return, the Advisor will be paid a subordinated participation in net sale proceeds ranging from a low of 5% of net sales provided investors have earned annualized return of 6% to a high of 15% of net sales proceeds if investors have earned annualized returns of 10% or more.
 
    Upon termination of the advisory agreement, the Advisor will receive the subordinated performance fee due upon termination. This fee ranges from a low of 5% of the amount by which the sum of the appraised value of our assets minus our liabilities on the date the advisory agreement is terminated plus total distributions (other than stock distributions) paid prior to termination of the advisory agreement exceeds the amount of invested capital plus annualized returns of 6%, to a high of 15% of the amount by which the sum of the appraised value of our assets minus its liabilities plus all prior distributions (other than stock distributions) exceeds the amount of invested capital plus annualized returns of 10% or more.
 
    In the event we list our stock for trading, the Advisor will receive a subordinated incentive listing fee instead of a subordinated participation in net sales proceeds. This fee ranges from a low of 5% of the amount by which the market value of our common stock plus all prior distributions (other than stock distributions) exceeds the amount of invested capital plus annualized returns of 6%, to a high of 15% of the amount by which the sum of the market value of our stock plus all prior distributions (other than stock distributions) exceeds the amount of invested capital plus annualized returns of 10% or more.
Dealer Manager Agreements
PCC, as dealer manager for our initial and follow-on public offerings, is entitled to receive a sales commission of up to 7% of gross proceeds from sales in the primary offerings. PCC is also entitled to receive a dealer manager fee equal to up to 3% of gross proceeds from sales in the primary offerings. PCC is also entitled to receive a reimbursement of bona fide due diligence expenses up to 0.5% of the gross proceeds from sales in the primary offerings. The advisory agreement requires the Advisor to reimburse us to the extent that offering expenses including sales commissions, dealer manager fees and organization and offering expenses (but excluding acquisition fees and acquisition expenses discussed above) are in excess of 13.5% of gross proceeds from our primary offerings. For the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, our dealer manager earned sales commission and dealer manager fee of approximately $1.1 million and $1.3 million, respectively. Dealer manager fees and sales commissions paid to PCC are a cost of capital raised and, as such, are included as a reduction of additional paid in capital in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets.

20


Table of Contents

14. Commitments and Contingencies
We monitor our properties for the presence of hazardous or toxic substances. While there can be no assurance that a material environment liability does not exist, we are not currently aware of any environmental liability with respect to the properties that we believe would have a material effect on our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows. Further, we are not aware of any environmental liability or any unasserted claim or assessment with respect to an environmental liability that we believe would require additional disclosure or the recording of a loss contingency.
Our commitments and contingencies include the usual obligations of real estate owners and operators in the normal course of business. In the opinion of management, these matters are not expected to have a material impact on our condensed consolidated financial position, cash flows and results of operations. We are not presently subject to any material litigation nor, to our knowledge, is any material litigation threatened against the Company which if determined unfavorably to us would have a material adverse effect on our cash flows, financial condition or results of operations.
At the recommendation of our advisor, the Independent Directors Committee of our board of directors is considering various strategic alternatives to enhance value for our stockholders. One of the alternatives under consideration is the hiring of a new dealer manager for our public offering of common stock, which was suspended on April 29, 2011. In addition, the Independent Directors Committee is continuing to evaluate possible changes to our advisory relationships. We may have difficulty finding a new qualified dealer manager and/or advisor, and any change in the dealer manager and/or advisor would disrupt our operations and our ability to raise capital in our public offering.
15. Business Combinations
On January 14, 2011, through a wholly-owned subsidiary, we purchased an assisted-living property, Forestview Manor, from 153 Parade Road, LLC a non-related party, for a purchase price of approximately $10.8 million. The acquisition was funded with our revolving credit facility from KeyBank National Association and with proceeds from our initial public offering.
The following summary provides the allocation of the acquired assets and liabilities as of the acquisition date. We have accounted for the acquisition as business combination under U.S. GAAP. Under business combination accounting, the assets and liabilities of the acquired property were recorded as of the acquisition date, at their respective fair values, and consolidated in our financial statements. The detail of the purchase price of the acquired property is set forth below:
         
    Forestview  
    Manor  
Land
  $ 1,320,000  
Buildings & improvements
    6,803,000  
Site improvements
    1,040,000  
Furniture & fixtures
    350,000  
Intangible assets
    960,000  
Goodwill
    277,000  
 
     
Real estate acquisitions
  $ 10,750,000  
 
     
 
       
Acquisition expenses
  $ 131,000  
We did not complete any acquisitions during the first quarter of 2010. The following unaudited pro forma information for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010 has been prepared to reflect the incremental effect of the acquisition as if such acquisition had occurred on January 1, 2010.
                 
    Three months     Three months  
    Ended     Ended  
    March 31, 2011     March 31, 2010  
Revenues
  $ 9,783,000     $ 3,992,000  
Net loss
  $ (1,594,000 )   $ (979,000 )
Basic and diluted net loss per common share attributable to common stockholders
  $ (0.13 )   $ (0.16 )
The Company recorded revenues and net income for the three months ended March 31, 2011 of approximately $0.8 million and $0.1 million, respectively, related to the acquisitions during the first quarter of 2011.

21


Table of Contents

16. Subsequent Events
On April 14, 2011, we purchased an assisted-living property, Sunrise of Allentown, from an affiliate of Sunrise Senior Living, Inc., a non-related party, for a purchase price of $9.0 million. The property will be rebranded as Woodland Terrace at the Oaks Senior Living (“Woodland Terrace”). The acquisition was funded with proceeds from our initial public offering and with proceeds from a mortgage loan from an unaffiliated lender that funded subsequent to the closing.
Sale of Shares of Common Stock
As of April 29, 2011, we had raised approximately $127.0 million through the issuance of approximately 12.7 million shares of our common stock under our initial and follow-on public offerings, excluding approximately 551,000 shares that were issued pursuant to our distribution reinvestment plans reduced by approximately 202,000 shares repurchased pursuant to our stock repurchase program.
Suspension of Offering, Dividend Reinvestment Plan and Stock Repurchase Program.
On April 29, 2011, we informed our stockholders that our Independent Directors Committee had directed us to suspend our follow-on offering, our dividend reinvestment program and our stock repurchase program (except repurchases due to death) because of the uncertainty associated with our Independent Directors Committee consideration of various strategic alternatives to enhance our stockholders’ value. One of the alternatives under consideration is the hiring of a new dealer manager for our follow-on offering; however, the Independent Directors Committee has made no determination regarding whether or when our follow-on offering may be recommenced.
Departure and Election of Certain Officers
On May 21, 2011, Terry G. Roussel, the President, Chief Executive Officer, Chairman of the board of directors and a director of the Company, informed the Company that he had resigned from his positions as President, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the board of directors effective as of May 21, 2011. Mr. Roussel remains a director of the Company and continues to serve as a member of the investment committee of the board of directors.
In response to the resignation of Mr. Roussel, our board of directors has elected Sharon C. Kaiser to serve as our President, effective as of May 23, 2011.
Item 2.   Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
The following “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” should be read in conjunction with our financial statements and notes thereto contained elsewhere in this report. This section contains forward-looking statements, including estimates, projections, statements relating to our business plans, objectives and expected operating results, and the assumptions upon which those statements are based. These forward-looking statements generally are identified by the words “believes,” “project,” “expects,” “anticipates,” “estimates,” “intends,” “strategy,” “plan,” “may,” “will,” “would,” “will be,” “will continue,” “will likely result,” and similar expressions. Forward-looking statements are based on current expectations and assumptions that are subject to risks and uncertainties which may cause actual results to differ materially from the forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements that were true at the time made may ultimately prove to be incorrect or false. We undertake no obligation to update or revise publicly any forward —looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. All forward-looking statements should be read in light of the risks identified in Part I, Item 1A of our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the SEC, and the risks identified in Part II, Item 1A of this quarterly report.
Our actual future results and trends may differ materially from expectations depending on a variety of factors discussed in our filings with the SEC. These factors include without limitation:
    the possibility of changes in our advisory and dealer-manager relationships as further described in the Risk Factors section of this quarterly report on Form 10-Q;
 
    changes in economic conditions generally and the real estate and healthcare markets specifically;

22


Table of Contents

    legislative and regulatory changes impacting the healthcare industry, including the implementation of the healthcare reform legislation enacted in 2010;
 
    legislative and regulatory changes impacting real estate investment trusts, or REITs, including their taxation;
 
    the availability of debt and equity capital;
 
    changes in interest rates;
 
    competition in the real estate industry;
 
    the supply and demand for operating properties in our proposed market areas;
 
    changes in accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, or GAAP; and
 
    the risk factors in our Annual Report for the year ended December 31, 2010 and this quarterly report on Form 10-Q.
Overview
We were incorporated on October 16, 2006 for the purpose of engaging in the business of investing in and owning commercial real estate. We intend to invest the net proceeds from our offerings primarily in investment real estate including health care, multi-tenant industrial, net-leased retail properties and other real estate related assets located in major metropolitan markets in the United States. As of March 31, 2011, we raised approximately $124.5 million of gross proceeds from the sale of approximately 12.5 million shares of our common stock in our initial and follow-on public offerings.
On April 29, 2011, we informed our stockholders that our Independent Directors Committee had directed us to suspend our follow-on offering, our dividend reinvestment program and our stock repurchase program (except repurchases due to death) because of the uncertainty associated with our Independent Directors Committee evaluation of various strategic alternatives to enhance our stockholders’ value. One of the alternatives under consideration is the hiring of a new dealer manager for our follow-on offering, however the Independent Directors Committee has made no determination regarding whether or when our follow-on offering may be recommenced. In addition, the Independent Directors Committee is continuing to evaluate possible changes to our advisory relationships.
Our revenues, which will be comprised largely of rental income, will include rents reported on a straight-line basis over the initial term of the lease. Our growth depends, in part, on our ability to (i) increase rental income and other earned income from leases by increasing rental rates and occupancy levels; (ii) maximize tenant recoveries given the underlying lease structures; and (iii) control operating and other expenses. Our operations are impacted by property specific, market-specific, general economic and other conditions.
Highlights for the Three Months Ended March 31, 2011
    We completed one acquisition for an aggregate purchase price of approximately $10.8 million. See Note 15.
 
    We increased our borrowing on the KeyBank credit facility by approximately $5.9 million in connection with the acquisition of Forestview Manor.
Status of Our Offering
    Prior to the suspension of our follow-on offering on April 29, 2011, we had raised approximately $127.0 million through the issuance of approximately 12.7 million shares of our common stock under our initial and follow-on offerings, excluding approximately 551,000 shares that were issued pursuant to our distribution reinvestment plan, reduced by approximately 202,000 shares repurchased pursuant to our stock repurchase program.

23


Table of Contents

Market Outlook — Real Estate and Real Estate Finance Markets
In recent years, both the national and most global economies have experienced substantially increased unemployment and a downturn in economic activity. Despite certain recent positive economic indicators and improved stock market performance, the aforementioned conditions, combined with low consumer confidence, have resulted in an unprecedented global recession and continue to contribute to a challenging economic environment that may delay the implementation of our business strategy or force us to modify it.
Despite the economic conditions discussed above, the demand for health care services is projected to continue to grow for the foreseeable future. The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services projects that national health expenditures will rise to $3.4 trillion in 2015, or 17.7% of gross domestic product (“GDP”), up from $2 trillion or 15.7% of GDP in 2005. The elderly are an important component of health care utilization, especially independent living services, assisted-living services, skilled nursing services, inpatient and outpatient hospital services and physician ambulatory care. The elderly population aged 65 and over is projected to increase by 76.6% through 2030.
Critical Accounting Policies
There have been no material changes to our critical accounting policies as previously disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010, as filed with the SEC.
Results of Operations
As of March 31, 2011, we operated in three reportable business segments: senior living operations, triple-net leased properties, and medical office building (“MOB”) properties. Our senior living operations segment invests in and operates assisted-living, memory care and other senior housing communities located in the United States. We engage independent third party managers to operate these properties. Our triple-net leased properties segment invests in healthcare properties in the United States leased under long-term “triple-net” or “absolute-net” leases, which require the tenants to pay all property-related expenses. Our MOB segment invests in medical office buildings and leases those properties to healthcare providers under long-term “full service” leases which may require tenants to reimburse property related expenses to us.
We began accepting subscriptions for shares under our initial public offering on June 20, 2008. We purchased our first senior housing property in January 2009, and as of March 31, 2011, we owned 14 properties. These properties included nine assisted-living facilities which comprise our senior housing segment, one medical office building, which comprises our MOB segment, and four operating healthcare facilities and one development healthcare facility, which comprise our triple-net leased segment. During the three months ended March 31, 2010, we owned five properties, including three senior housing facilities, one net leased facility and one development project. Accordingly, the results of our first quarter 2011 and 2010 operations are not directly comparable.
Comparison of the Three Months Ended March 31, 2011 and 2010
                                 
    Three Month Ended              
    March 31,              
    2011     2010     $ Change     % Change  
Net operating income, as defined (1)
                               
 
                               
Senior living operations
  $ 2,567,000     $ 735,000     $ 1,832,000       249  
Triple-net leased properties
    1,144,000       447,000       697,000       156  
Medical office building
    186,000             186,000       N/A  
 
                       
Total portfolio net operating income
  $ 3,897,000     $ 1,182,000     $ 2,715,000       230  
 
                       
 
                               
Reconciliation to net loss:
                               
Net operating income, as defined (1)
  $ 3,897,000     $ 1,182,000     $ 2,715,000       229  
Unallocated (expenses) income:
                               
General and administrative expenses
    (664,000 )     (528,000 )     136,000       26  
Asset management fees and expenses
    (431,000 )     (165,000 )     266,000       161  
Real estate acquisitions costs and earn out costs
    (1,127,000 )     (458,000 )     669,000       146  
Depreciation and amortization
    (1,861,000 )     (640,000 )     1,221,000       191  
Interest income
    4,000       3,000       1,000       33  
Interest expense
    (1,476,000 )     (337,000 )     1,139,000       338  
 
                       
Net loss
  $ (1,658,000 )   $ (943,000 )   $ 715,000       76  
 
                       

24


Table of Contents

 
(1)   Net operating income, a non-GAAP supplemental measure, is defined as total revenue less property operating and maintenance expenses. We use net operating income to evaluate the operating performance of our real estate investments and to make decisions concerning the operation of the property. We believe that net operating income is useful to investors in understanding the value of income-producing real estate. Net income is the GAAP measure that is most directly comparable to net operating income; however, net operating income should not be considered as an alternative to net income as the primary indicator of operating performance as it excludes certain items such as depreciation and amortization, interest expense and corporate general and administrative expenses. Additionally, net operating income as we define it may not be comparable to net operating income as defined by other REITs or companies.
Senior Living Operations
Total revenue for senior living operations includes rental revenue and resident fees and service income. Property operating and maintenance expenses include labor, food, utilities, marketing, management and other property operating costs. Net operating income for the three months ended March 31, 2011 increased to $2.6 million from $0.7 million for the three months ended March 31, 2010. The increase is primarily due to acquisitions completed during 2010.
                                 
    Three Months Ended              
    March 31,              
    2011     2010     $ Change     % Change  
Senior Living Operations — Net operating income
                               
 
                               
Total revenues
                               
Rental revenue
  $ 6,200,000     $ 1,990,000     $ 4,210,000       212  
Resident services and fee income
    1,702,000       495,000       1,207,000       244  
Tenant reimbursement and other income
    110,000       70,000       40,000       57  
Less:
                               
Property operating and maintenance expenses
    5,445,000       1,820,000       3,625,000       199  
 
                       
Total portfolio net operating income
  $ 2,567,000     $ 735,000     $ 1,832,000       249  
 
                       
Triple-Net Leased Properties
Total revenue for triple-net leased properties includes rental revenue and expense reimbursements from tenants. Property operating and maintenance expenses include insurance and property taxes and other operating expenses reimbursed by our tenants. Net operating income increased to $1.1 million for the three months ended March 31, 2011 compared to $0.4 million for the three months ended March 31, 2010 due to the acquisitions completed in 2010.
                                 
    Three Months Ended              
    March 31,              
    2011     2010     $ Change     % Change  
Triple-Net Leased Properties — Net operating income
                               
 
                               
Total revenues
                               
Rental revenue
  $ 1,159,000     $ 447,000     $ 712,000       159  
Tenant reimbursement and other income
    158,000       40,000       118,000       295  
Less:
                               
Property operating and maintenance expenses
    173,000       40,000       133,000       333  
 
                       
Total portfolio net operating income
  $ 1,144,000     $ 447,000     $ 697,000       156  
 
                       
Medical Office Buildings
Total revenue for medical office buildings includes rental revenue and expense reimbursements from tenants. Property operating and maintenance expenses include utilities, repairs and maintenance, insurance and property taxes. Net operating income increased to

25


Table of Contents

$0.2 million for the three months ended March 31, 2011 from $0 compared to the three months ended March 31, 2010, due to the acquisition completed in December 2010.
                                 
    Three Months Ended              
    March 31,              
    2011     2010     $ Change     % Change  
Medical Office Buildings — Net operating income
                               
 
                               
Total revenues
                               
Rental revenue
  $ 201,000     $     $ 201,000       N/A  
Tenant reimbursement and other income
    55,000             55,000       N/A  
Less:
                               
Property operating and maintenance expenses
    70,000             70,000       N/A  
 
                       
Total portfolio net operating income
  $ 186,000     $     $ 186,000       N/A  
Unallocated (expenses) income
General and administrative expenses increased to $0.7 million for the three months ended March 31, 2011 from $0.5 million for the three months ended March 31, 2010. The increase was principally due to higher reimbursements to the Advisor for the direct and indirect costs of providing administrative and management services and higher professional fees, resulting from the growth of the investment portfolio since March 31, 2010.
As a result of the acquisitions in 2010, asset management fees and expenses for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010 increased to $0.4 million from $0.2 million and depreciation and amortization for the same periods increased to $1.9 million from $0.6 million.
For the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, real estate acquisition costs and earn out costs, consisting of fees paid to the Advisor, acquisition costs paid directly to third-parties, earn out provision related to GreenTree at Westwood and promote provision related to Rome LTACH, were $1.1 million and $0.5 million, respectively. The 2011 increase in acquisition costs was due to higher third party expenses related to transactions closed or in process during the first quarter of 2011, partially offset by lower acquisition fees related to lower equity raised in the first quarter of 2011. Additionally, the increase is due to increases in the estimated amounts to be paid in connection with the Greentree acquisition earn out and the Rome LTACH promote provision. A portion of the acquisition fees due to our Advisor are paid upon receipt of offering proceeds and the balance is paid at the time of investment acquisition.
Interest income was comparable for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010.
Interest expense for the three months ended March 31, 2011 increased to $1.5 million from $0.4 million for the three months ended March 31, 2010 due to increased real estate acquisition financing in 2010 and during the first quarter of 2011.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
On April 29, 2011, we informed our stockholders that our Independent Directors Committee had directed us to suspend our offering, our dividend reinvestment program and our stock repurchase program (except repurchases due to death) because of the uncertainty associated with their consideration of various strategic alternatives to enhance our stockholders’ value. One of the alternatives under consideration is the hiring of a new dealer manager for our follow-on offering, however the Independent Directors Committee has made no determination regarding whether or when our follow-on offering may be recommenced. In addition, the Independent Directors Committee is also continuing to evaluate possible changes to our advisory relationships. In addition to uncertainties associated with potentially engaging a new dealer manager or advisor and possibly restarting our public offering, financial markets have recently experienced unusual volatility and uncertainty. Liquidity has tightened in all financial markets, including the debt and equity markets. Our ability to fund property acquisitions or development projects, as well as our ability to repay or refinance debt maturities, could be adversely affected by an inability to successfully resume our public offering and to secure financing at reasonable terms, if at all.

26


Table of Contents

We expect that primary sources of capital over the long-term will include net proceeds from the sale of our common stock and net cash flows from operations. We expect that our primary uses of capital will be for property acquisitions, for the payment of tenant improvements, for the payment of operating expenses, including interest expense on any outstanding indebtedness, reducing outstanding indebtedness and for the payment of distributions.
We expect to have sufficient cash available from cash on hand and operations to fund capital improvements and principal payments due on our borrowings, including amounts which may become due on our Key Bank credit facility, in the next twelve months. We expect to fund stockholder distributions from the excess of cash on hand and from operations over required capital improvements and debt payments. This excess may be insufficient to make distributions at the current level or at all.
As of March 31, 2011, we had approximately $37.9 million in cash and cash equivalents on hand. Our liquidity will increase if additional subscriptions for shares are accepted in our follow-on public offering and decrease as net offering proceeds are expended in connection with the acquisition, operation of properties and distributions made in excess of cash available from operating cash flows.
As of March 31, 2011, a total of approximately 12.5 million shares of our common stock had been sold in our initial and follow-on public offerings for aggregate gross proceeds of approximately $124.5 million.
We intend to own our core plus properties with low to moderate levels of debt financing. We will incur moderate to high levels of indebtedness when acquiring our value-added and opportunistic properties and possibly other real estate investments. The debt levels on core plus properties during the offering period may exceed the long-term target range of debt percentages on these types of properties. However, we intend to reduce the percentage to fall within the 40% to 60% range no later than the end of our offering stage. To the extent sufficient proceeds from our public offering, debt financing, or a combination of the two are unavailable to repay acquisition debt financing down to the target ranges within a reasonable time as determined by our board of directors, we will endeavor to raise additional equity or sell properties to repay such debt so that we will own our properties with low to moderate levels of permanent financing. In the event that our public offering is not fully sold, our ability to diversify our investments may be diminished.
On November 19, 2010, we entered into an agreement with KeyBank National Association, an unaffiliated financial institution, to obtain a $25.0 million revolving credit facility (the “Facility”). The Facility may be increased in the future in incremental amounts of at least $25.0 million at our request subject to attaining certain portfolio size targets. The initial term of the Facility is 24 months, maturing on November 18, 2012, and may be extended by six months subject to satisfaction of certain conditions, including payment of an extension fee. The actual amount of credit available under the Facility is a function of certain loan-to-cost, loan-to-value and debt service coverage ratios contained in the Facility. The Facility will be secured by first priority liens on our eligible real property assets that make up the borrowing base (as such term is defined) for the Facility. The interest rate for this Facility is one-month LIBOR plus a margin of 400 basis points, with a floor of 200 basis points for one-month LIBOR. The Facility also requires payment of a fee of up to 25 basis points related to unused credit available to us under the Facility. We are entitled to prepay the obligations at any time without penalty. The facility includes a financial covenant requiring us to raise at least $20 million in our public offering in the six month period ending June 30, 2011, and to raise an additional $20 million in net offering proceeds during each six month calendar period thereafter. Because we suspended our public offering on April 29, 2011, we will not be able to satisfy this covenant; however, we expect to negotiate a waiver of the covenant with the lender or to pay off the outstanding balance under the credit facility using currently available cash. As of March 31, 2011, the credit facility had a balance of approximately $16.3 million.
We will not rely on advances from our Advisor to acquire properties but our Advisor and its affiliates may loan funds to special purposes entities that may acquire properties on our behalf pending our raising sufficient proceeds from our offerings to purchase the properties from the special purpose entity.
There may be a delay between the sale of our shares and the purchase of properties. During this period, our public offering net offering proceeds will be temporarily invested in short-term, liquid investments that could yield lower returns than investments in real estate.
Potential future sources of capital include proceeds from future equity offerings, proceeds from secured or unsecured financings from banks or other lenders, proceeds from the sale of properties and undistributed funds from operations.
Distributions
Some or all of our distributions have been paid from sources other than operating cash flow, such as offering proceeds and proceeds from loans, including those secured by our assets. Currently, we make cash distributions to our stockholders at an annualized rate of

27


Table of Contents

7.5%, based on a $10.00 per share purchase price. Until proceeds from our public offering are invested and generating operating cash flow sufficient to make distributions to stockholders, we intend to pay all or a substantial portion of our distributions from the proceeds of our public offering or from borrowings in anticipation of future cash flow, reducing the amount of funds that would otherwise be available for investment.
Historically, we have used a portion of the proceeds from our distribution reinvestment plan for general corporate purposes, including capital expenditures on our real estate investments, tenant improvement costs and leasing costs related to our investments in real estate properties; reserves required by financings of our investments in real estate properties; and the repayment of debt. Because our distribution reinvestment plan was suspended on May 10, 2011, we will no longer have distribution reinvestment plan proceeds available for such general corporate purposes. Because such funds will not be available from the distribution reinvestment plan offering, we may have to use a greater proportion of our cash flow from operations to meet our general cash requirements, which would reduce cash available for distributions.
                                 
    Distributions Declared     Cash Flow from  
Period   Cash     Reinvested     Total     Operations  
First quarter 2010
  $ 525,000     $ 506,000     $ 1,031,000     $ 48,000  
 
                               
First quarter 2011
  $ 1,152,000     $ 1,124,000     $ 2,276,000     $ 1,583,000  
From our inception in October 2006 through March 31, 2011, we declared aggregate distributions of $10.5 million and our cumulative net loss during the same period was $13.3 million.
Contractual Obligations
The following table reflects our contractual obligations as of March 31, 2011, specifically our obligations under long-term debt agreements and purchase obligations:
                                         
    Payment due by period  
            Less than 1                     More than  
Contractual Obligations   Total     year     1-3 years     3-5 years     5 years  
Long-Term Debt Obligations (1)
  $ 90,885,000     $ 793,000     $ 33,902,000     $ 27,229,000     $ 28,961,000  
Interest expense related to long-term debt (2)
  $ 31,664,000     $ 4,595,000     $ 7,439,000     $ 4,875,000     $ 14,755,000  
Payable to related parties (3)
  $ 1,000     $ 1,000     $     $     $  
Acquisition commitment (4)
  $ 8,730,000     $ 8,730,000     $     $     $  
Performance based earn outs (5)
  $ 1,741,000     $ 1,000,000     $ 741,000     $     $  
 
(1)   Represents principal amount owed on all outstanding debt as of March 31, 2011.
 
(2)   Represents interest expense related to various loan agreements in connection with all acquisitions as of March 31, 2011. The information in the table above reflects our projected interest rate obligations for these loan agreements based on the contract interest rates, interest payment dates, and scheduled maturity dates.
 
(3)   Payable to related parties consists of offering costs, acquisition fees, expense reimbursement payable, sales commissions and dealer manager fees to our Advisor and PCC.
 
(4)   On March 25, 2011, we became obligated under a purchase and sale agreement to acquire Sunrise of Allentown. The acquisition was initially funded with proceeds from our public offering. Subsequent to closing, we placed a mortgage debt of approximately $5.8 million from an unaffiliated lender.
 
(5)   Represents the earn out agreement related to the Greentree at Westwood and Terrance at Mountain Creek.
Item 3.   Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
Market risk includes risks that arise from changes in interest rates, foreign currency exchange rates, commodity prices, equity prices and other market changes that affect market sensitive instruments. We invest our cash and cash equivalents in government-backed securities and FDIC-insured savings accounts, which, by their nature, are subject to interest rate fluctuations. However, we believe that the primary market risk to which we will be exposed is interest rate risk relating the variable portion of our debt financing. As of March 31, 2011, we had approximately $50.3 million of variable rate debt, the majority of which is at a rate tied to the 3-month LIBOR. A 1.0% change in 3-Month LIBOR would result in a change in annual interest expense of approximately $503,000 per year. Our interest rate risk management objectives will be to monitor and manage the impact of interest rate changes on earnings and cash

28


Table of Contents

flows by using certain derivative financial instruments such as interest rate swaps and caps in order to mitigate our interest rate risk on variable rate debt. We will not enter into derivative or interest rate transactions for speculative purposes.
In addition to changes in interest rates, the fair value of our real estate is subject to fluctuations based on changes in the real estate capital markets, market rental rates for healthcare facilities, local, regional and national economic conditions and changes in the credit worthiness of tenants. All of these factors may also affect our ability to refinance our debt if necessary.
Item 4.   Controls and Procedures
We maintain disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our Exchange Act reports is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our senior management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. Our President and Chief Financial Officer has reviewed the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures and has concluded that the disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of the end of the period covered by this report.
Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our President and Chief Financial Officer, we evaluated our disclosure controls and procedures, as such term is defined under Rule 13a-15(e) promulgated under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934. In designing and evaluating the disclosure controls and procedures, management recognizes that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives, and management is required to apply its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures. Based on her evaluation as of the end of the period covered by this report, our President and Chief Financial Officer has concluded that we maintained effective internal control over financial reporting, at the reasonable assurance level, as of the end of the period covered by this report.
There have been no changes in our internal control over financial reporting during our most recent fiscal quarter that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
PART II — OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1A.   Risk Factors
The following risk supplements the risks disclosed in Part I, Item 1A if our annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010.
We are dependent upon our advisor and its affiliates to conduct our operations. Our advisor is losing money with respect to its management and operation of our business, which could require us to find alternative service providers. In addition, at our advisor’s recommendation, we are considering engaging a new dealer manager for our public offering, which is currently suspended, and this may also entail engaging a new advisor. We may have difficulty finding a qualified dealer manager and/or advisor, and any successor dealer manager or advisor may not be as well suited to manage us or our offering. These potential changes could result in a significant disruption of our business and may adversely affect the value of our stockholders’ investment in us.
At the recommendation of our advisor, the Independent Directors Committee of our board of directors is considering various strategic alternatives to enhance value for our stockholders. One of the alternatives under consideration is the hiring of a new dealer manager for our public offering of common stock, which was suspended on April 29, 2011. However, the Independent Directors Committee has made no determination regarding whether or when our follow-on offering may be recommenced. We may have difficulty finding a new qualified dealer manager, and any change in the dealer manager will require our public offering to remain suspended until regulatory approvals are obtained. Such a suspension could last months, and we cannot assure you that the necessary regulatory approvals would be obtained. In addition, any new dealer manager we engage may fail to raise significant capital. If we fail to raise significant capital, our portfolio will be less diversified and the value of our stockholders’ investment in us will vary more greatly with changes in the value of any one asset. Moreover, our general and administrative expenses will be greater in proportion to our assets, which will adversely affect our stockholders’ returns.
The strategic alternatives under consideration may also involve changes to our advisory relationships, including the possibility of a replacement of our advisor. As previously reported, our advisor has been losing money with respect to the services it provides to us. In addition, the financial condition of our advisor has been further weakened by the recent determination of our Independent Directors Committee that only approximately $0.2 million of the total Excess Amount (as defined in our charter) of total operating

29


Table of Contents

expenses for the four quarters ended March 31, 2011 was justified. The effect of this determination is to obligate the advisor to repay to us the balance of the total Excess Amount in the amount of approximately $1.6 million, which it may not have the resources to do. In addition, the amount of this repayment obligation is disputed by our advisor. If our advisor cannot meet its obligations as they arise, or if we are unable to resolve the current dispute regarding repayment of excess operating expenses, we may have to find another advisor. Moreover, adverse changes in the financial condition of our advisor could entitle Servant Healthcare Investments LLC, on which our advisor relies to source and manage our healthcare investments, to end its relationship with our advisor and to work with another program.
If we are required to find a new advisor, or if we seek to alter our advisory relationships in connection with a change in dealer manager as described above, we may have difficulty doing so, and any successor dealer manager or advisor may not be as well suited to manage us or our public offering. In addition, our revolving credit facility with KeyBank National Association, and mortgage indebtedness secured by certain of our properties, contain covenants that restrict our ability to change advisors without the consent of the lenders. If we were required to change advisors and are not able to obtain consent to do so from one or more of our lenders, we would be in breach of such covenants. Such breaches could result in acceleration of our repayment obligations under the affected loans. As we have no employees and are entirely dependent on our advisor to manage our operations, these potential changes could result in a significant disruption of our business.
Although our Independent Directors Committee is monitoring our relationships with our advisors closely and will exercise care to try to minimize significant disruptions to our business, we cannot assure you that these disruptions can be avoided or that your investment in us will not suffer in connection with any of the potential changes in our advisory relationships.
We have paid, and may in the future pay, distributions from sources other than cash provided from operations.
Until proceeds from our offerings are invested and generating operating cash flow sufficient to support distributions to stockholders, we intend to pay a substantial portion of our distributions from the proceeds of our offerings or from borrowings in anticipation of future cash flow. Our organizational documents do not limit the amount of distributions we can fund from sources other than from operating cash flow. To the extent that we use offering proceeds to fund distributions to stockholders, the amount of cash available for investment in properties will be reduced. For the four quarters ended March 31, 2011, our cash outflow from operations was approximately $1.6 million. During that period we paid distributions to investors of approximately $6.9 million, of which approximately $3.4 million was reinvested pursuant to our distribution reinvestment plan and approximately $3.5 million was paid to investors in cash from our offering proceeds.
We will no longer have funds available from the distribution reinvestment plan offering to use for general corporate purposes; therefore, we may have to use a greater proportion of our cash flow from operations to meet our general cash requirements, which would reduce cash available for distributions.
Historically, we have used a portion of the proceeds from our distribution reinvestment plan for general corporate purposes, including capital expenditures on our real estate investments, tenant improvement costs and leasing costs related to our investments in real estate properties; reserves required by financings of our investments in real estate properties; and the repayment of debt. Because our distribution reinvestment plan was suspended on May 10, 2011, we will no longer have distribution reinvestment plan proceeds available for such general corporate purposes. Because such funds will not be available from the distribution reinvestment plan offering, we may have to use a greater proportion of our cash flow from operations to meet our general cash requirements, which would reduce cash available for distributions. As a consequence, we may not have sufficient cash available to maintain our current level of distributions.
Our revolving credit facility with KeyBank National Association contains a debt covenant that requires us to raise at least $20 million in net offering proceeds in our public offering by June 30, 2011. Because we suspended our public offering on April 29, 2011, we are likely to breach this covenant unless we are able to negotiate a waiver with the lender or we pay off the outstanding balance under the credit facility. If we are not able to negotiate a waiver of the covenant or pay off the outstanding balance, the lender is likely to accelerate our obligations under the credit facility, which could materially adversely affect the value of your investment in us.
In November 2010, we entered into a revolving credit facility with KeyBank National Association, as lead arranger, a lender and agent, under which we may borrow up to $25 million. The facility includes a financial covenant requiring us to raise at least $20 million in our public offering during the six months ended June 30, 2011, and to raise an additional $20 million in net offering proceeds during each six-month calendar period thereafter. Should we not raise this amount of capital, we will be in breach under the facility. Because we suspended our public offering on April 29, 2011, we will not be able to satisfy this covenant unless we are able to negotiate a waiver of the covenant with the lender or we pay off the outstanding balance under the credit facility. Such a breach

30


Table of Contents

could result in an acceleration of the repayment date. If we did not have sufficient cash to repay the facility at that time, the lenders under the facility could foreclose on any of our properties securing the facility. Such foreclosure could result in a material loss for us and would adversely affect the value of our stockholders’ investment in us.
We are dependent on services provided to us by Servant Healthcare Investments, LLC (“SHI”) pursuant to a sub-advisory arrangement between SHI and affiliates of our advisor. In the event that we are required to find an alternative advisor, the services provided to us by SHI may be disrupted, which could have a significant adverse impact on our business and could reduce the value of an investment in us.
We rely on SHI and its key personnel to provide acquisition and asset management services for our portfolio of properties. We do not contract directly with SHI for the provision of these services; rather SHI provides these services to us pursuant to a sub-advisory arrangement between SHI and affiliates of our advisor. If we are required to engage an alternative advisor, either as a result of the deteriorating financial condition of our current advisor or as a result of our pursuit of strategic alternatives that would entail engaging a new advisor, the services currently being provided to us by SHI and its personnel could be disrupted. Because we have no employees and are entirely dependent on the personnel of our advisor and SHI to manage our operations, a disruption in the services provided by SHI could have a significant adverse impact on our business and could reduce the value of our stockholders’ investments in us.
Item 2.   Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
(a)   We did not sell any equity securities that we did not registered under the Securities Act of 1933 during the period covered by this Form 10-Q.
 
(b)   On August 10, 2007, our Registration Statement on Form S-11 (File No. 333-139704), covering a public offering of up to 40,000,000 shares of common stock for an aggregate offering amount of $400.0 million was declared effective under the Securities Act of 1933. The offering has not terminated yet. As of March 31, 2011, we had sold approximately 12.5 million shares of common stock in our ongoing public offering and raised gross offering proceeds of approximately $124.5 million. From this amount, we incurred approximately $12.2 million in selling commissions and dealer manager fees payable to our dealer manager and approximately $3.9 million in acquisition fees payable to the Advisor. We had acquired 13 properties and one development project as of March 31, 2011.
 
(c)   During the three months ended March 31, 2011, we repurchased shares pursuant to our stock repurchase program as follows:
                 
    Total Number     Average  
    of Shares     Price Paid  
Period   Redeemed     per Share  
January
    1,194     $ 9.88  
February
    17,379     $ 9.42  
March
    25,217     $ 9.29  
 
             
 
    43,790          
 
             
Item 5.   Other Information
Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
The annual meeting of stockholders of Cornerstone Healthcare Plus REIT, Inc. was held on May 12, 2011. The matters submitted to the stockholders for a vote were:
  1.   To elect seven directors to hold office for one-year terms expiring in 2012. The nominees submitted for election as directors were Terry G. Roussel, William A. Bloomer, Romeo R. Cefalo, Barry A. Chase, Steven M. Pearson, Ronald Shuck, and James M. Skorheim.
 
  2.   To approve the following proposed amendments to our charter:
  a.   Amendments to the definition of independent director in our charter;
 
  b.   Amendments to the charter provision relating to the issuance of preferred stock;
 
  c.   Amendments to the charter provision relating to acquisition fees;

31


Table of Contents

  d.   Amendments to the charter provision relating to the approval of acquisitions;
 
  e.   Amendments to the charter provision relating to limitations on sales to affiliates;
 
  f.   Amendments to the charter provision relating to limitations on joint venture;
 
  g.   Amendments to the charter provision relating to limitations on other transactions involving affiliates;
 
  h.   Amendments to the charter provision relating to limitations on loans;
 
  i.   Amendments to the charter provision relating to roll-up transactions;
 
  j.   Amendments to the charter provision relating to meetings of our stockholders;
 
  k.   Amendments to the charter provision relating to voting limitations on shares held by our Advisor, directors and their affiliates;
 
  l.   Amendments to the charter provision relating to access to our stockholder list; and
 
  m.   Amendments to the charter provision relating to reports to our stockholders.
  3.   To approve, by a non-binding advisory vote, the compensation paid to our named executive officers.
 
  4.   To select, by a non-binding advisory vote, the frequency at which the stockholders will be asked to approve, by a non-binding advisory vote, the compensation paid to our named executive officers.
Voting results
Proposal 1
The following are the voting results (in number of shares) with respect to the election of directors:
                 
Name   For     Withhold  
Terry G. Roussel
    7,177,661       200,061  
William A. Bloomer
    7,196,711       181,011  
Romeo R. Cefalo
    7,199,368       178,354  
Barry A. Chase
    7,196,864       100,858  
Steven M. Pearson
    7,203,553       174,169  
Ronald Shuck
    7,203,553       174,169  
James M. Skorheim
    7,201,077       176,645  
A majority of the votes present in person or by proxy at the meeting was required for the election of the directors. As a result, all of the nominees were elected to serve as directors for one-year terms and until their successors are duly elected and qualified.

32


Table of Contents

Proposal 2
The following are the voting results (in number of shares) with respect to the proposed amendments to our charter:
                         
Proposal   For     Against     Abstain  
2.a.
    6,941,500       134,731       301,491  
2.b.
    6,921,588       147,080       309,054  
2.c.
    6,909,006       164,415       304,301  
2.d.
    6,938,888       127,567       311,267  
2.e.
    6,968,882       105,064       303,776  
2.f.
    6,947,143       122,613       307,966  
2.g.
    6,939,822       129,303       308,598  
2.h.
    6,934,225       147,418       296,078  
2.i.
    6,929,054       147,128       301,541  
2.j.
    6,951,151       125,374       301,197  
2.k.
    6,959,181       126,079       292,461  
2.l.
    6,955,476       126,699       295,548  
2.m.
    6,975,301       110,022       292,399  
The affirmative vote of the holders of at least a majority of our outstanding shares of common stock entitled to vote on the proposals is required to approve the amendments to our charter. Abstentions and broker non-votes have the same effect as votes against the proposals to amend our charter. As result, all of the proposed amendments to our charter have been approved.
Proposal 3
The following are the voting results (in number of shares) with respect to the non-binding advisory vote regarding the compensation paid to our named executive officers:
         
For   Against   Abstain
6,504,593
  408,773   464,357
The affirmative vote of a majority of the total votes cast at the annual meeting for or against this proposal is required to approve the compensation paid to our named executive officers. Abstentions and broker non-votes are not considered votes cast and have no

33


Table of Contents

effect on the outcome of this matter. As a result, the non-binding advisory vote has approved the compensation paid to our named executive officers.
Proposal 4
The following are the voting results (in number of shares) with respect to the the frequency at which the stockholders will be asked to approve, by a non-binding advisory vote, the compensation paid to our named executive officers:
             
One Year   Two Years   Three Years   Abstain
928,492   462,669   5,642,195   344,366
The selection of the frequency of the advisory vote on the compensation paid to our named executive officers is decided by a plurality of the votes cast for the frequency periods available. Abstentions and broker non-votes are not considered votes cast and have no effect on the outcome of this matter. As a result, the non-binding advisory vote has approved a triennial frequency for non-binding advisory votes to approve the compensation paid to our named executive officers.

34


Table of Contents

Item 6.   Exhibits
         
  3.1    
Articles of Amendment and Restatement of the Registrant (incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009).
       
 
  3.2    
Articles of Amendment of the Registrant, dated as of December 29, 2009 (incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009).
       
 
  3.3    
Amended and Restated Bylaws (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to Pre-Effective Amendment No. 1 to the Registration Statement on Form S-11 (No. 333-139704), filed on March 21, 2007).
       
 
  4.1    
Subscription Agreement (incorporated by reference to Appendix A to the Registrant’s prospectus filed on February 7, 2011).
       
 
  4.2    
Statement regarding restrictions on transferability of shares of common stock (to appear on stock certificate or to be sent upon request and without charge to stockholders issued shares without certificates) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to Pre-Effective Amendment No. 2 to the Registration Statement on Form S-11 (No. 333-139704) filed on June 15, 2007).
       
 
  4.3    
Distribution Reinvestment Plan (incorporated by reference to Appendix B to the Registrant’s prospectus filed on February 7, 2011).
       
 
  31    
Certification of Principal Executive and Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
       
 
  32    
Certification of Principal Executive and Principal Financial Officer and Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec.1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

35


Table of Contents

SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this quarterly report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized this 27th day of May 2011.
         
  CORNERSTONE HEALTHCARE PLUS REIT, INC.
 
 
  By:   /s/ SHARON C. KAISER    
    Sharon C. Kaiser, President and Chief Financial Officer   
    (Principal Executive Officer, Principal Financial Officer and
Principal Accounting Officer)
 
 
 

36