Attached files
file | filename |
---|---|
EX-31.1 - EX-31.1 - PARKVALE FINANCIAL CORP | l42724aexv31w1.htm |
EX-31.2 - EX-31.2 - PARKVALE FINANCIAL CORP | l42724aexv31w2.htm |
EX-32.1 - EX-32.1 - PARKVALE FINANCIAL CORP | l42724aexv32w1.htm |
Table of Contents
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
þ | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 | |
FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED MARCH 31, 2011 |
COMMISSION FILE NO: 0-17411
PARKVALE FINANCIAL CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Pennsylvania | 25-1556590 | |
(State of incorporation) | (I.R.S. Employer Identification Number) |
4220 William Penn Highway, Monroeville, Pennsylvania 15146
(Address of principal executive offices; zip code)
Registrants telephone number, including area code: (412) 373-7200
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months and (2)
has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (Section 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12
months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
Yes o No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer or
a non-accelerated filer. See definition of accelerated filer and large accelerated filer in Rule
12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated filer o | Accelerated filer o | Non-accelerated filer o (Do not check if smaller reporting company) |
Smaller reporting company þ |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act). Yes o No þ
The closing sales price of the Registrants Common Stock on May 16, 2011 was $10.30 per share.
Number of shares of Common Stock outstanding as of May 16, 2011 was 5,582,846.
PARKVALE FINANCIAL CORPORATION
INDEX
2
Table of Contents
Item 1.
PARKVALE FINANCIAL CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
(Dollar amounts in thousands, except share data)
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
(Dollar amounts in thousands, except share data)
March 31, | June 30, | |||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
(Unaudited) | ||||||||
ASSETS |
||||||||
Cash and noninterest-earning deposits |
$ | 15,492 | $ | 17,736 | ||||
Federal funds sold |
156,218 | 135,773 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
171,710 | 153,509 | ||||||
Interest-earning deposits in other banks |
3,835 | 801 | ||||||
Investment securities available for sale at fair value (cost of
$5,501 at March 31 and $65,778 at June 30) |
5,243 | 65,770 | ||||||
Investment securities held to maturity (fair value
of $481,082 at March 31 and $437,931 at June 30) |
484,223 | 443,452 | ||||||
Federal Home Loan Bank Stock, at cost |
12,958 | 14,357 | ||||||
Loans, net of allowance of $19,030 at March 31
and $19,209 at June 30 |
998,936 | 1,032,363 | ||||||
Foreclosed real estate, net |
9,390 | 8,637 | ||||||
Office properties and equipment, net |
17,144 | 17,374 | ||||||
Goodwill |
25,634 | 25,634 | ||||||
Intangible assets |
2,195 | 2,877 | ||||||
Prepaid expenses and other assets |
70,024 | 77,606 | ||||||
Total assets |
$ | 1,801,292 | $ | 1,842,380 | ||||
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY |
||||||||
LIABILITIES |
||||||||
Deposits |
$ | 1,480,886 | $ | 1,488,073 | ||||
Advances from Federal Home Loan Bank |
150,862 | 185,973 | ||||||
Term debt |
21,875 | 23,750 | ||||||
Other debt |
12,925 | 13,865 | ||||||
Advance payments from borrowers for taxes and insurance |
6,775 | 7,526 | ||||||
Other liabilities |
4,105 | 4,249 | ||||||
Total liabilities |
1,677,428 | 1,723,436 | ||||||
SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY |
||||||||
Preferred stock ($1.00 par value, liquidation preference $1,000;
5,000,000 shares authorized; 31,762 shares issued) |
31,762 | 31,762 | ||||||
Common stock ($1.00 par value; 10,000,000 shares
authorized; 6,734,894 shares issued) |
6,735 | 6,735 | ||||||
Additional paid-in capital |
2,151 | 2,734 | ||||||
Treasury stock at cost (1,152,048 shares at March 31
and 1,205,683 shares at June 30) |
(24,072 | ) | (25,193 | ) | ||||
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
(13,516 | ) | (13,413 | ) | ||||
Retained earnings |
120,804 | 116,319 | ||||||
Total shareholders equity |
123,864 | 118,944 | ||||||
Total liabilities and shareholders equity |
$ | 1,801,292 | $ | 1,842,380 | ||||
3
Table of Contents
PARKVALE FINANCIAL CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Dollar amounts in thousands, except per share data)
(Unaudited)
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Dollar amounts in thousands, except per share data)
(Unaudited)
Three months ended | Nine months ended | |||||||||||||||
March 31, | March 31, | |||||||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | |||||||||||||
Interest income: |
||||||||||||||||
Loans |
$ | 12,408 | $ | 13,745 | $ | 38,269 | $ | 42,768 | ||||||||
Investments |
3,497 | 4,799 | 10,631 | 14,895 | ||||||||||||
Federal funds sold |
77 | 88 | 284 | 291 | ||||||||||||
Total interest income |
15,982 | 18,632 | 49,184 | 57,954 | ||||||||||||
Interest expense: |
||||||||||||||||
Deposits |
4,543 | 6,464 | 14,538 | 21,843 | ||||||||||||
Borrowings |
2,340 | 2,754 | 7,476 | 8,289 | ||||||||||||
Total interest expense |
6,883 | 9,218 | 22,014 | 30,132 | ||||||||||||
Net interest income |
9,099 | 9,414 | 27,170 | 27,822 | ||||||||||||
Provision for loan losses |
691 | 1,164 | 2,740 | 4,851 | ||||||||||||
Net interest income after
provision for losses |
8,408 | 8,250 | 24,430 | 22,971 | ||||||||||||
Noninterest Income: |
||||||||||||||||
Other-than-temporary impairment losses
recognized in earnings |
(255 | ) | (6,536 | ) | (4,236 | ) | (12,537 | ) | ||||||||
Non-credit related losses recognized in
other comprehensive income |
| 5,492 | 2,039 | 7,950 | ||||||||||||
Net impairment losses recognized in earnings |
(255 | ) | (1,044 | ) | (2,197 | ) | (4,587 | ) | ||||||||
Service charges on deposit accounts |
1,628 | 1,487 | 5,052 | 4,754 | ||||||||||||
Other fees and service charges |
339 | 376 | 1,101 | 1,102 | ||||||||||||
Net gain on sale of assets |
| 167 | 1,366 | 2,372 | ||||||||||||
Other |
507 | 521 | 1,799 | 1,575 | ||||||||||||
Total noninterest income |
2,219 | 1,507 | 7,121 | 5,216 | ||||||||||||
Noninterest Expense: |
||||||||||||||||
Compensation and employee benefits |
3,649 | 3,804 | 11,049 | 11,236 | ||||||||||||
Office occupancy |
1,158 | 1,243 | 3,272 | 3,449 | ||||||||||||
Marketing |
78 | 78 | 256 | 238 | ||||||||||||
FDIC insurance |
918 | 769 | 2,716 | 1,982 | ||||||||||||
Office supplies, telephone and postage |
477 | 479 | 1,487 | 1,412 | ||||||||||||
Other |
1,555 | 1,494 | 4,757 | 4,456 | ||||||||||||
Total noninterest expense |
7,835 | 7,867 | 23,537 | 22,773 | ||||||||||||
Income before income taxes |
2,792 | 1,890 | 8,014 | 5,414 | ||||||||||||
Income tax expense |
845 | 472 | 2,003 | 716 | ||||||||||||
Net income |
1,947 | 1,418 | 6,011 | 4,698 | ||||||||||||
Less: Preferred stock dividend |
397 | 397 | 1,191 | 1,191 | ||||||||||||
Income available to common shareholders |
$ | 1,550 | $ | 1,021 | $ | 4,820 | $ | 3,507 | ||||||||
Net income per common basic share |
$ | 0.28 | $ | 0.18 | $ | 0.87 | $ | 0.64 | ||||||||
Net income per common diluted share |
$ | 0.28 | $ | 0.18 | $ | 0.87 | $ | 0.64 |
4
Table of Contents
PARKVALE FINANCIAL CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Dollar amounts in thousands)
(Unaudited)
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Dollar amounts in thousands)
(Unaudited)
Nine months ended | ||||||||
March 31, | ||||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
Cash flows from operating activities: |
||||||||
Interest received |
$ | 50,262 | $ | 57,544 | ||||
Loan fees received |
444 | 242 | ||||||
Other fees and commissions received |
7,148 | 6,604 | ||||||
Interest paid |
(22,182 | ) | (30,260 | ) | ||||
Cash paid to suppliers and others |
(17,302 | ) | (39,447 | ) | ||||
Income taxes refund (paid) |
3,748 | (1,718 | ) | |||||
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities |
22,118 | (7,035 | ) | |||||
Cash flows from investing activities: |
||||||||
Proceeds from sale of investment securities available for sale |
51,308 | 2,331 | ||||||
Proceeds from maturities of investment securities held to maturity |
207,469 | 280,366 | ||||||
Purchase of investment securities held to maturity |
(242,235 | ) | (332,140 | ) | ||||
(Purchase) maturity of deposits in other banks |
(3,034 | ) | 3,318 | |||||
Principal collected on loans |
209,781 | 181,473 | ||||||
Loans made to customers, net of loans in process |
(169,186 | ) | (121,120 | ) | ||||
Purchase of loans |
(10,722 | ) | | |||||
Proceeds from loans sold |
| 7,527 | ||||||
Other |
(412 | ) | (178 | ) | ||||
Net cash provided by investing activities |
42,969 | 21,577 | ||||||
Cash flows from financing activities: |
||||||||
Net increase in checking and savings accounts |
34,679 | 58,945 | ||||||
Net (decrease) in certificates of deposit |
(41,867 | ) | (56,751 | ) | ||||
Repayment of FHLB advances |
(35,014 | ) | (19 | ) | ||||
Repayment of term debt |
(1,875 | ) | (625 | ) | ||||
Net (decrease) in other borrowings |
(940 | ) | (6,683 | ) | ||||
Net (decrease) in borrowers advances for taxes and insurance |
(751 | ) | (759 | ) | ||||
Dividends paid |
(1,690 | ) | (2,009 | ) | ||||
Contribution to benefit plans |
572 | 712 | ||||||
Net cash (used in) financing activities |
(46,886 | ) | (7,189 | ) | ||||
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents |
18,201 | 7,353 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
153,509 | 165,891 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
$ | 171,710 | $ | 173,244 | ||||
Reconciliation of net income to net cash provided by operating activities: |
||||||||
Net income |
$ | 6,011 | $ | 4,698 | ||||
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: |
||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
1,324 | 1,439 | ||||||
(Accretion) and amortization of loan fees and discounts |
488 | (1,296 | ) | |||||
Loan fees collected and deferred (premiums paid) |
60 | (45 | ) | |||||
Provision for loan losses |
2,740 | 4,851 | ||||||
Loss on writedown of assets |
2,197 | 4,587 | ||||||
Gain on sale of assets |
(1,366 | ) | (2,372 | ) | ||||
Decrease in accrued interest receivable |
460 | 797 | ||||||
Decrease (increase) in other assets |
7,124 | (16,327 | ) | |||||
(Decrease) increase in accrued interest payable |
(52 | ) | 43 | |||||
Increase (decrease) in other liabilities |
3,132 | (3,410 | ) | |||||
Total adjustments |
16,107 | (11,733 | ) | |||||
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities |
$ | 22,118 | $ | (7,035 | ) | |||
For purposes of reporting cash flows, cash and cash equivalents include cash and noninterest
earning deposits, and federal funds sold. Generally, federal funds are sold for one-day periods.
Loans transferred to foreclosed assets aggregated $7.4 million for the nine months ended March 31,
2011 and $8.0 million for the nine months ended March 31, 2010, and is included in the principal
collected on loans component of the consolidated statements of cash flows. Loans were transferred
to foreclosed assets at the lesser of their carrying value or indicated fair value, less costs to
sell.
5
Table of Contents
PARKVALE FINANCIAL CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
(Dollars in thousands, except share data)
(Unaudited)
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
(Dollars in thousands, except share data)
(Unaudited)
Accumulated | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Additional | Other | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Preferred | Common | Paid-in | Treasury | Comprehensive | Retained | Shareholders | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock | Stock | Capital | Stock | Income (Loss) | Earnings | Equity | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance, June 30, 2010 |
$ | 31,762 | $ | 6,735 | $ | 2,734 | ($25,193 | ) | ($13,413 | ) | $ | 116,319 | $ | 118,944 | ||||||||||||||
Net income, nine months ended
March 31, 2011 |
6,011 | 6,011 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive
income (loss): |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Change in swap liability, net of tax |
(238 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Change in unrealized gain (loss)
on securities, net of deferred
tax benefit of $236 |
675 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reclassification adjustment, net
of taxes of $(291) |
(540 | ) | (103 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Comprehensive income |
5,908 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dividends declared on common
stock at $0.06 per share |
(335 | ) | (335 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dividends on preferred stock |
(1,191 | ) | (1,191 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sale of treasury stock to |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ESOP & Benefit Plans |
(633 | ) | 1,121 | 488 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Recognition of stock option
compensation expense |
50 | 50 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance, March 31, 2011 |
$ | 31,762 | $ | 6,735 | $ | 2,151 | ($24,072 | ) | ($13,516 | ) | $ | 120,804 | $ | 123,864 | ||||||||||||||
Balance, June 30, 2009 |
$ | 31,762 | $ | 6,735 | $ | 4,116 | ($27,314 | ) | ($10 | ) | $ | 135,471 | $ | 150,760 | ||||||||||||||
Net income, nine months ended
March 31, 2010 |
4,698 | 4,698 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive
Income (loss): |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Change in swap liability |
452 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Change in unrealized gain (loss)
on securities, net of deferred
tax benefit of $(2,713) |
(4,273 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reclassification adjustment, net
of taxes of $(808) |
(1,407 | ) | (5,228 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Comprehensive loss |
(530 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dividends declared on common
stock at $0.15 per share |
(823 | ) | (823 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dividends on preferred stock |
(1,191 | ) | (1,191 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sale of treasury stock to |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ESOP & Benefit Plans |
(1,409 | ) | 2,121 | 712 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Recognition of stock option
compensation expense |
27 | 27 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance, March 31, 2010 |
$ | 31,762 | $ | 6,735 | $ | 2,734 | ($25,193 | ) | ($5,238 | ) | $ | 138,155 | $ | 148,955 | ||||||||||||||
6
Table of Contents
NOTES TO UNAUDITED INTERIM CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollar amounts in thousands, except share data)
(Dollar amounts in thousands, except share data)
NOTE 1. STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
The statements of operations for the nine months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010 are unaudited, but
in the opinion of management reflect all adjustments (consisting of only normal recurring accruals)
necessary for a fair presentation of the results of operations for those periods. The results of
operations for the nine months ending March 31, 2011 are not necessarily indicative of the results
that may be expected for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2011. The Annual Report on Form 10-K for
the year ended June 30, 2010 contains additional information and should be read in conjunction with
this report.
NOTE 2. RECLASSIFICATION
Certain amounts in prior period financial statements have been reclassified to conform to the
current period presentation. The reclassifications had no significant effect on Parkvales
financial condition or results of operations.
NOTE 3. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
The Corporation evaluated and disclosed all material subsequent events that provide evidence about
conditions that existed as of March 31, 2011 through the date the consolidated financial statements
were filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
7
Table of Contents
NOTES TO UNAUDITED INTERIM CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Dollar amounts in thousands, except share data)
(Dollar amounts in thousands, except share data)
NOTE 4. LOANS AND THE ALLOWANCE FOR LOAN LOSS
Loans are summarized as follows:
March 31, 2011 | June 30, 2010 | |||||||
Mortgage loans: |
||||||||
1-4 Family |
$ | 633,105 | $ | 660,685 | ||||
Commercial |
159,435 | 159,991 | ||||||
792,540 | 820,676 | |||||||
Consumer loans: |
||||||||
Home Equity |
145,479 | 147,567 | ||||||
Automobile |
28,047 | 34,817 | ||||||
Other Consumer |
9,571 | 7,250 | ||||||
183,097 | 189,634 | |||||||
Commercial business loans |
41,429 | 40,445 | ||||||
Total gross loans |
1,017,066 | 1,050,755 | ||||||
Less: Loans in process |
3 | 135 | ||||||
Allowance for loan losses |
19,030 | 19,209 | ||||||
Unamortized premiums and deferred loan fees |
(903 | ) | (952 | ) | ||||
Loans, net |
$ | 998,936 | $ | 1,032,363 | ||||
The loans receivable portfolio is segmented into mortgage loans, consumer loans and commercial
business loans. The mortgage loan segment has two classes, 1-4 family first lien residential
mortgage loans and commercial mortgage loans, which are comprised of commercial real estate,
multi-family and acquisition and development loans. The consumer loan segment consists of three
classes, home equity loans, automobile loans and other loans. The commercial segment consists of
one class, commercial and industrial loans.
Portfolio Risk Characteristics:
A loan is considered impaired when, based on current information and events, it is probable that
the Corporation will be unable to collect the scheduled payments of principal or interest when due
according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement. Factors considered by management in
determining impairment include payment status, collateral value and the probability of collecting
scheduled principal and interest payments when due. Loans that experience insignificant payment
delays and payment shortfalls generally are not classified as impaired. Management determines the
significance of payment delays and payment shortfalls on a case-by-case basis, taking into
consideration all of the known circumstances surrounding the loan and the borrower, including the
length of the delay, the reasons for the delay, the borrowers prior payment record and the amount
of the shortfall in relation to the principal and interest owed. Impairment is measured on a loan
by loan basis for commercial business loans and commercial mortgage loans by either the present
value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loans effective interest rate or the fair
value of the collateral if the loan is collateral dependent.
An allowance for loan losses is established for an impaired loan if its carrying value exceeds its
estimated fair value. The estimated fair values of substantially all of the Corporations impaired
loans are measured based on the estimated fair value of the loans collateral.
8
Table of Contents
NOTES TO UNAUDITED INTERIM CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Dollar amounts in thousands, except share data)
(Dollar amounts in thousands, except share data)
For commercial loans secured by real estate, estimated fair values are determined primarily
through third-party appraisals. When a real estate secured loan becomes impaired, a decision is
made regarding whether an updated certified appraisal of the real estate is necessary. This
decision is based on various considerations, including the age of the most recent appraisal, the
loan-to-value ratio based on the original appraisal and the condition of the property. Appraised
values are discounted to arrive at the estimated selling price of the collateral, which is
considered to be the estimated fair value. The discounts also include estimated costs to sell the
property.
For commercial business loans secured by non-real estate collateral, such as accounts receivable,
inventory and equipment, estimated fair values are determined based on the borrowers financial
statements, inventory reports, accounts receivable agings or equipment appraisals or invoices.
Indications of value from these sources are generally discounted based on the age of the financial
information or the quality of the assets.
Large groups of smaller balance homogeneous loans are collectively evaluated for impairment.
Accordingly, the Corporation does not separately identify individual 1-4 family mortgage loans or
consumer loans for impairment disclosures, unless such loans are the subject of a troubled debt
restructuring agreement.
Loans whose terms are modified are classified as troubled debt restructurings if the Corporation
grants such borrowers concessions and it is deemed that those borrowers are experiencing financial
difficulty. Concessions granted under a troubled debt restructuring generally involve a temporary
reduction in interest rate or an extension of a loans stated maturity date. Non-accrual troubled
debt restructurings are restored to accrual status if a pattern of consistent principal and
interest payments under the modified terms is demonstrated after modification. Loans classified as
troubled debt restructurings are designated as impaired.
1-4 family loans include residential first mortgage loans originated by Parkvale Bank in the
greater Pittsburgh Metropolitan area, which comprises its primary market area, and loans purchased
from other financial institutions in the secondary market, which are geographically diversified. We
currently originate fixed-rate, fully amortizing mortgage loans with maturities of 15 to 30 years.
We also offer adjustable rate mortgage (ARM) loans where the interest rate either adjusts on an
annual basis or is fixed for the initial one, three or five years and then adjusts annually. We
underwrite 1 to 4 family residential mortgage loans with loan-to-value ratios of up to 95%,
generally provided that the borrower obtains private mortgage insurance on loans that exceed 80% of
the appraised value or sales price, whichever is less, of the secured property. We also require
that title insurance, hazard insurance and, if appropriate, flood insurance be maintained on all
properties securing real estate loans. We require that a licensed appraiser from our list of
approved appraisers perform and submit to us an appraisal on all properties secured by a first
mortgage on 1 to 4 family first mortgage loans. In underwriting 1-4 family residential mortgage
loans, the Corporation evaluates both the borrowers ability to make monthly payments and the value
of the property securing the loan. Real estate loans originated by the Corporation generally
contain a due upon sale clause allowing the Corporation to declare the unpaid principal balance
due and payable upon the sale of the property. The Corporation has not engaged in
9
Table of Contents
NOTES TO UNAUDITED INTERIM CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Dollar amounts in thousands, except share data)
(Dollar amounts in thousands, except share data)
sub-prime residential mortgage loan originations. Our single-family residential mortgage loans
generally are underwritten on terms and documentation conforming to guidelines issued by Freddie
Mac. All of Parkvales lending activities, including loan purchases, are subject to written
underwriting standards and loan origination procedures approved by the Board of Directors.
Commercial mortgage loans include commercial real estate, multi-family and other loans that are
secured by non-farm nonresidential properties. Commercial and multi-family real estate loans
generally present a higher level of risk than loans secured by 1-4 family residences. This greater
risk is due to several factors, including the concentration of principal in a limited number of
loans and borrowers, the effect of general economic conditions on income producing properties and
the increased difficulty of evaluating and monitoring these types of loans. Furthermore, the
repayment of loans secured by commercial and multi-family real estate is typically dependent upon
the successful operation of the related real estate project. If the cash flow from the project is
reduced (for example, if leases are not obtained or renewed, or a bankruptcy court modifies a lease
term, or a major tenant is unable to fulfill its lease obligations), the borrowers ability to
repay the loan may be impaired.
Consumer loans include home equity loans secured by first or second liens on residential property,
automobile loans and other unsecured consumer loans. The Corporation currently originates most of
its consumer loans in its primary market area and surrounding areas. The Corporation originates
consumer loans primarily on a direct basis. Consumer loans generally have higher interest rates and
shorter terms than residential mortgage loans; however, they have additional credit risk due to the
type of collateral securing the loan.
Consumer loans may entail greater credit risk than do residential mortgage loans, particularly in
the case of consumer loans secured by rapidly depreciable assets, such as automobiles. In such
cases, any repossessed collateral for a defaulted consumer loan may not provide an adequate source
of repayment of the outstanding loan balance as a result of the greater likelihood of damage, loss
or depreciation. In addition, consumer loan collections are dependent on the borrowers continuing
financial stability, and thus are more likely to be affected by adverse personal circumstances.
Furthermore, the application of various federal and state laws, including bankruptcy and insolvency
laws, may limit the amount that can be recovered on such loans.
Commercial business loans are primarily short term facilities extended to small businesses and
professionals located within the communities served by Parkvale, and are generally secured by
business assets of the borrower. The commercial business loans which we originated may be either a
revolving line of credit or for a fixed term of generally 10 years or less. Interest rates are
adjustable, indexed to a published prime rate of interest, or fixed. Generally, equipment,
machinery, real property or other corporate assets secure such loans. Personal guarantees from the
business principals are generally obtained as additional collateral.
10
Table of Contents
NOTES TO UNAUDITED INTERIM CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Dollar amounts in thousands, except share data)
(Dollar amounts in thousands, except share data)
The following table presents the classes of the loan portfolio summarized by the aggregate
pass rating and the classified ratings of special mention, substandard and doubtful within the
Corporations internal risk rating system as of March 31, 2011:
Pass | Special Mention |
Substandard | Doubtful | Total | ||||||||||||||||
Mortgage loans: |
||||||||||||||||||||
1-4 family |
$ | 608,879 | $ | 3,958 | $ | 20,268 | $ | | $ | 633,105 | ||||||||||
Commercial |
155,647 | 1,101 | 2,687 | | 159,435 | |||||||||||||||
Consumer loans: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Home Equity |
144,671 | | 780 | 28 | 145,479 | |||||||||||||||
Automobile |
27,929 | | 118 | | 28,047 | |||||||||||||||
Other Consumer |
9,567 | | | 4 | 9,571 | |||||||||||||||
Commercial business
loans |
38,655 | 1,140 | 1,634 | | 41,429 | |||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 985,348 | $ | 6,199 | $ | 25,487 | $ | 32 | $ | 1,017,066 | ||||||||||
Pass-rated loans consist of facilities that do not currently expose the Bank to sufficient
risk to warrant classifications. Special mention loans have potential weaknesses requiring
managements close attention that if uncorrected, may result in deterioration of the repayment
prospects. Substandard loans have a well-defined weakness that jeopardizes liquidation of the debt,
and includes loans that are inadequately protected by the current net worth and paying capacity of
the obligor or of the collateral pledged, if any. Doubtful loans have all the weaknesses inherent
with substandard facilities with the added characteristic that collection or liquidation in full,
on the basis of current conditions and facts, is highly improbable.
The following table presents nonaccrual loans by class of the loan portfolio as of March 31, 2011:
Mortgage loans: |
||||
1-4 family |
$ | 23,324 | ||
Commercial |
1,425 | |||
Consumer loans: |
||||
Home Equity |
503 | |||
Automobile |
136 | |||
Other Consumer |
4 | |||
Commercial business loans |
1,259 | |||
Total |
$ | 26,651 | ||
11
Table of Contents
NOTES TO UNAUDITED INTERIM CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Dollar amounts in thousands, except share data)
(Dollar amounts in thousands, except share data)
A loan is considered impaired when, based on current information and events, it is probable
that Parkvale will not be able to collect the scheduled payments of principal and interest when due
according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement. The following table summarizes
information regarding impaired loans by loan portfolio class as of March 31, 2011:
Net Recorded | Unpaid Principal | Related | Average Recorded | Interest Income | ||||||||||||||||
Investment | Balance | Allowance | Investment | Recognized | ||||||||||||||||
With no related allowance
recorded: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Mortgage loans: |
||||||||||||||||||||
1-4 family |
$ | 20,289 | $ | 20,289 | $ | | $ | 19,871 | $ | 263 | ||||||||||
Commercial |
| | | | | |||||||||||||||
Consumer loans: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Home Equity |
| | | | | |||||||||||||||
Automobile |
| | | | | |||||||||||||||
Other Consumer |
| | | | | |||||||||||||||
Commercial business loans |
799 | 799 | | 1,735 | | |||||||||||||||
With an allowance recorded: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Mortgage loans: |
||||||||||||||||||||
1-4 family |
$ | 8,550 | $ | 13,802 | $ | 5,252 | $ | 9,744 | $ | | ||||||||||
Commercial |
1,394 | 2,013 | 619 | 1,369 | 14 | |||||||||||||||
Consumer loans: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Home Equity |
406 | 564 | 158 | 399 | | |||||||||||||||
Automobile |
113 | 228 | 115 | 134 | | |||||||||||||||
Other Consumer |
| 27 | 27 | | | |||||||||||||||
Commercial business loans |
| 49 | 49 | | | |||||||||||||||
Total: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Mortgage loans: |
||||||||||||||||||||
1-4 family |
$ | 28,839 | $ | 34,091 | $ | 5,252 | $ | 29,615 | $ | 263 | ||||||||||
Commercial |
1,394 | 2,013 | 619 | 1,369 | 14 | |||||||||||||||
Consumer loans: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Home Equity |
406 | 564 | 158 | 399 | | |||||||||||||||
Automobile |
113 | 228 | 115 | 134 | | |||||||||||||||
Other Consumer |
| 27 | 27 | | | |||||||||||||||
Commercial business loans |
799 | 848 | 49 | 1,735 | |
12
Table of Contents
NOTES TO UNAUDITED INTERIM CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Dollar amounts in thousands, except share data)
(Dollar amounts in thousands, except share data)
At March 31, 2011, modifications have been performed at market terms on 126 loans totaling
$20,289 primarily related to extension of maturity dates and extension of interest-only payment
periods of thirty-six months or less. These modified loans, which are all performing at March 31,
2011, are included in the reported $20,289 of impaired loans without a related allowance for loan
losses amount above. The discounted cash flow analysis related to these modifications results in an
insignificant impact over the life of the loan.
The performance and credit quality of the loan portfolio is monitored by analyzing the age of the
loans receivable as determined by the length of time a recorded payment is past due. The following
table presents the classes of the loan portfolio summarized by the past due status as of March 31,
2011:
Loans | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
60-89 | Total | Receivable | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
30-59 Days | Days | Greater than | Past | Total Loans | > 90 Days | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Past Due | Past Due | 90 Days | Due | Current | Receivables | and Accruing | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Mortgage loans: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1-4 family |
$ | 5,774 | $ | 4,655 | $ | 23,324 | $ | 33,753 | $ | 599,352 | $ | 633,105 | $ | | ||||||||||||||
Commercial |
3,111 | 419 | 1,425 | 4,955 | 154,480 | 159,435 | | |||||||||||||||||||||
Consumer loans: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Home Equity |
681 | 256 | 503 | 1,440 | 144,039 | 145,479 | | |||||||||||||||||||||
Automobile |
205 | 41 | 136 | 382 | 27,665 | 28,047 | | |||||||||||||||||||||
Other Consumer |
8 | 10 | 4 | 22 | 9,549 | 9,571 | | |||||||||||||||||||||
Commercial business
loans |
117 | 208 | 1,259 | 1,584 | 39,845 | 41,429 | | |||||||||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 9,896 | $ | 5,589 | $ | 26,651 | $ | 42,136 | $ | 974,930 | $ | 1,017,066 | $ | | ||||||||||||||
The adequacy of the allowance for loan loss is determined by management through evaluation of
the loss probable on individual nonperforming, delinquent and high dollar loans, economic and
business trends, growth and composition of the loan portfolio and historical loss experience, as
well as other relevant factors.
The following summarizes the allowance for loan loss activity for the nine month period ended March
31, 2010
Beginning balance |
$ | 17,960 | ||
Provision for losses mortgage loans |
4,727 | |||
Provision for losses consumer loans |
127 | |||
Provision for (recovery of) losses commercial business loans |
(3 | ) | ||
Loans recovered |
34 | |||
Loans charged off |
(5,188 | ) | ||
Ending balance |
$ | 17,657 | ||
13
Table of Contents
NOTES TO UNAUDITED INTERIM CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Dollar amounts in thousands, except share data)
(Dollar amounts in thousands, except share data)
The following table presents the Allowance for Loan Losses and Recorded Investment in
Financing Receivables at March 31, 2011:
Commercial | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1-4 family | Commercial | Home | Other | Business | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mortgage | Mortgage | Equity | Automobile | Consumer | Loans | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Allowance for Loan Losses: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Beginning balance
at June 30, 2010: |
$ | 10,440 | $ | 3,340 | $ | 2,091 | $ | 907 | $ | 155 | $ | 2,276 | $ | 19,209 | ||||||||||||||
Charge-offs |
(2,593 | ) | (46 | ) | (183 | ) | (46 | ) | (69 | ) | (58 | ) | (2,995 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Recoveries |
15 | | | 34 | | 27 | 76 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Provisions |
2,106 | 537 | 64 | 33 | | | 2,740 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Ending balance at
March 31, 2011 |
$ | 9,968 | $ | 3,831 | $ | 1,972 | $ | 928 | $ | 86 | $ | 2,245 | $ | 19,030 | ||||||||||||||
Ending balance:
individually
evaluated for
impairment |
$ | 5,252 | $ | 619 | $ | 158 | $ | 115 | $ | 27 | $ | 49 | $ | 6,220 | ||||||||||||||
Ending balance:
collectively
evaluated for
impairment |
$ | 4,716 | $ | 3,212 | $ | 1,814 | $ | 813 | $ | 59 | $ | 2,196 | $ | 12,810 | ||||||||||||||
Ending balance:
loans acquired with
deteriorated
credit quality |
$ | | $ | | $ | | $ | | $ | | $ | | $ | | ||||||||||||||
Recorded Investment: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ending balance |
$ | 633,105 | $ | 159,435 | $ | 145,479 | $ | 28,047 | $ | 9,571 | $ | 41,429 | $ | 1,017,066 | ||||||||||||||
Ending balance:
individually
evaluated for
impairment |
$ | 34,091 | $ | 2,013 | $ | 564 | $ | 228 | $ | 27 | $ | 848 | $ | 37,771 | ||||||||||||||
Ending balance:
collectively
evaluated for
impairment |
$ | 599,014 | $ | 157,422 | $ | 144,915 | $ | 27,819 | $ | 9,544 | $ | 40,581 | $ | 979,295 |
NOTE 5. COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
Sources of comprehensive income (loss) not included in net income are unrealized gains and losses
on certain investments in equity securities, mortgage-backed securities, corporate debt and swaps
on interest rate contracts. For the nine months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, total comprehensive
income (loss) amounted to $5,908 and $(530), respectively.
14
Table of Contents
NOTES TO UNAUDITED INTERIM CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Dollar amounts in thousands, except share data)
(Dollar amounts in thousands, except share data)
NOTE 6. FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
US GAAP requires a hierarchal disclosure framework associated with the level of pricing
observations utilized in measuring assets and liabilities at fair value. This hierarchy requires
the use of observable market data when available. The three broad levels of hierarchy are as
follows:
Level I | Quoted prices are available in the active markets for identical assets or liabilities as of the measurement date. | |
Level II | Pricing inputs are other than quoted prices in active markets, which are either directly or indirectly observable as of the measurement date. The nature of these assets and liabilities includes items for which quoted prices are available but traded less frequently, and items that are fair valued using other financial instruments, the parameters of which can be directly observed. | |
Level III | Valuations derived from valuation techniques in which one or more significant inputs or significant value drivers are unobservable. Level III valuations incorporate certain assumptions and projections in determining the fair value assigned to such assets or liabilities. |
The following table presents the assets and liabilities reported on the consolidated statements of
financial condition at their fair value as of March 31, 2011 by level within the fair value
hierarchy. Financial assets and liabilities are classified in their entirety based on the lowest
level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. Equity securities in the
available-for-sale (AFS) security portfolio are measured at fair value using quoted market prices
and classified within Level I of the valuation hierarchy. Mutual funds in the available-for-sale
security portfolio are measured at fair value using Level II valuation hierarchy. Interest rate
swaps are priced using other similar financial instruments and are classified as Level II.
Financial Instruments Measured on a recurring basis
March 31, 2011 | June 30, 2010 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Level I | Level II | Level III | Total | Level I | Level II | Level III | Total | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Available for sale
securities: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
CMOs Non
Agency
(Residential) |
$ | | $ | | $ | | $ | | $ | | $ | 59,804 | $ | | $ | 59,804 | ||||||||||||||||
Common Equities |
1 | | | 1 | 682 | | | 682 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mutual Fund
ARM mortgages |
| 5,242 | | 5,242 | | 5,284 | | 5,284 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest rate swaps |
| 403 | | 403 | | 494 | | 494 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 1 | $ | 5,645 | $ | | $ | 5,646 | $ | 682 | $ | 65,582 | $ | | $ | 66,264 | ||||||||||||||||
15
Table of Contents
NOTES TO UNAUDITED INTERIM CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Dollar amounts in thousands, except share data)
(Dollar amounts in thousands, except share data)
The following table presents the assets measured on a nonrecurring basis on the consolidated
statements of financial condition at their fair value as of March 31, 2011. In cases where
valuation techniques included inputs that are unobservable and are based on estimates and
assumptions developed by the reporting entity based on the best information available under each
circumstance, the asset valuation is classified as Level III inputs. Pooled trust preferred
securities and impaired loans are measured using Level III valuation hierarchy. Our pooled trust
preferred securities are collateralized by the trust preferred securities of individual banks,
thrifts and bank holding companies, and to a lesser extent, insurance companies. There has been
little or no active trading in these securities for approximately twenty-four months; therefore it
was more appropriate to determine estimated fair value using a discounted cash flow analysis. The
discount rate applied to the cash flows is determined by evaluating the current market yields for
comparable corporate and structured credit products along with an evaluation of the risks
associated with the cash flows of the comparable security. Due to the fact that there is no active
market for the pooled trust preferred collateralized debt obligations, one key reference point is
the market yield for the single issue trust preferred securities issued by banks and thrifts for
which there is more activity than for the pooled securities. Adjustments are then made to reflect
the credit and structural differences between these two security types.
The estimated fair value of impaired loans is based upon the estimated fair value of the collateral
less estimated selling costs when the loan is collateral dependent, or based upon the present value
of expected future cash flows available to pay the loan. Collateral values are generally based upon
appraisals from approved, independent state certified appraisers.
The estimated fair value of foreclosed real estate is comprised of commercial and residential real
estate properties obtained in partial or total satisfaction of loan obligations. Foreclosed real
estate acquired in settlement of indebtedness is recorded at the lower of the carrying amount of
the loan or fair value less costs to sell. Subsequently, these assets are carried at the lower of
the carrying value or fair value less costs to sell. Accordingly, it may be necessary to record
nonrecurring fair value adjustments. Fair value, when recorded, is generally based upon appraisals
by licensed or certified appraisers and is classified as Level II.
Level I | Level II | Level III | Total | |||||||||||||
Assets Measured on a Nonrecurring Basis: |
||||||||||||||||
Other than temporarily
impaired (OTTI) Held to
maturity trust preferred
securities |
$ | | $ | | $ | 11,016 | $ | 11,016 | ||||||||
Impaired loans |
| | 10,463 | 10,463 | ||||||||||||
Impaired foreclosed real estate |
| 3,575 | | 3,575 |
The carrying value of impaired loans was $16,683 with an allowance for loss of $6,220 at March
31, 2011. The carrying value of the foreclosed real estate was $4,399 with an allowance of $824 at
March 31, 2011, and the charge to earnings during the March 31, 2011 quarter related to impaired
foreclosed real estate was $120.
US GAAP requires the determination of fair value for certain assets, liabilities and contingent
liabilities. The carrying amount approximates fair value for the following categories:
16
Table of Contents
NOTES TO UNAUDITED INTERIM CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Dollar amounts in thousands, except share data)
(Dollar amounts in thousands, except share data)
Cash and Noninterest-Bearing Deposits, which includes noninterest-bearing demand deposits
Federal Funds Sold
Interest-Earning Deposits in Other Banks
Accrued interest
Cash Surrender Value (CSV) of Bank Owned Life Insurance (BOLI)
Checking, savings and money market accounts
Federal Funds Sold
Interest-Earning Deposits in Other Banks
Accrued interest
Cash Surrender Value (CSV) of Bank Owned Life Insurance (BOLI)
Checking, savings and money market accounts
The following methods and assumptions were used to estimate the fair value of other classes of
financial instruments as of March 31, 2011 and June 30, 2010.
Investment Securities: The fair values of investment securities are obtained from the Interactive
Data Corporation pricing service and various investment brokers for securities not available from
public sources. Prices on certain trust preferred securities were calculated using a discounted
cash flow model based upon market spreads for longer term securities as permitted for Level III
assets when market quotes are not available. See accompanying notes for additional information on
investment securities.
Loans Receivable: Fair values were estimated by discounting contractual cash flows using interest
rates currently being offered for loans with similar credit quality adjusted for prepayment
assumptions.
Deposit Liabilities: Fair values of commercial investment agreements and fixed-maturity
certificates of deposit are estimated using a discounted cash flow calculation that applies
interest rates currently being offered on commercial investment agreements or time deposits of
similar remaining maturities.
Advances from Federal Home Loan Bank: Fair value is determined by discounting the advances using
estimated incremental borrowing rates for similar types of borrowing arrangements.
Term Debt and Other Debt: Fair value is determined by discounting the term and other debt using
estimated incremental borrowing rates for similar types of borrowing arrangements.
Off-Balance-Sheet Instruments: Fair value for off-balance-sheet instruments (primarily loan
commitments) are estimated using internal valuation models and are limited to fees charged to enter
into similar agreements, taking into account the remaining terms of the agreements and the
counterparties credit standing. Unused consumer and commercial lines of credit are assumed equal
to the outstanding commitment amount due to the variable interest rate attached to these lines of
credit.
17
Table of Contents
NOTES TO UNAUDITED INTERIM CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Dollar amounts in thousands, except share data)
(Dollar amounts in thousands, except share data)
The following table presents additional information about financial assets and liabilities
measured at fair value:
March 31, 2011 | June 30, 2010 | |||||||||||||||
Carrying | Carrying | |||||||||||||||
Fair Value | Value | Fair Value | Value | |||||||||||||
Financial Assets: |
||||||||||||||||
Cash and non-interest-earning deposits |
$ | 15,492 | $ | 15,492 | $ | 17,736 | $ | 17,736 | ||||||||
Federal funds sold |
156,218 | 156,218 | 135,773 | 135,773 | ||||||||||||
Interest-earning deposits in other banks |
3,835 | 3,835 | 801 | 801 | ||||||||||||
Investment securities available for sale |
5,243 | 5,243 | 65,770 | 65,770 | ||||||||||||
Investment securities held to maturity |
481,082 | 484,223 | 437,931 | 443,452 | ||||||||||||
FHLB stock |
12,958 | 12,958 | 14,357 | 14,357 | ||||||||||||
Loans receivable |
1,043,996 | 1,017,066 | 1,087,009 | 1,050,755 | ||||||||||||
Accrued interest receivable |
5,738 | 5,738 | 7,409 | 7,409 | ||||||||||||
Cash surrender value of BOLI |
26,093 | 26,093 | 25,288 | 25,288 | ||||||||||||
Financial Liabilities: |
||||||||||||||||
Checking, savings and money market accounts |
$ | 730,713 | $ | 730,713 | $ | 696,364 | $ | 696,364 | ||||||||
Certificates of deposit |
772,013 | 750,173 | 812,339 | 791,709 | ||||||||||||
Advances from Federal Home Loan Bank |
167,638 | 150,862 | 204,699 | 185,973 | ||||||||||||
Term debt |
22,279 | 21,875 | 24,244 | 23,750 | ||||||||||||
Other debt |
12,280 | 12,925 | 13,156 | 13,865 | ||||||||||||
Interest rate swap |
402 | 402 | 494 | 494 | ||||||||||||
Accrued interest payable |
850 | 850 | 902 | 902 | ||||||||||||
Off-balance sheet loan instruments |
$ | 19 | $ | | $ | 118 | $ | |
NOTE 7. INVESTMENT SECURITIES
Investment significant accounting policies are as follows:
Securities Held to Maturity, Available for Sale and Other than Temporary Impairment
Certain debt securities that management has the positive intent and ability to hold to maturity are
classified as held to maturity and recorded at amortized cost. Trading securities are recorded at
fair value with changes in fair value included in earnings. Securities not classified as held to
maturity or trading, including equity securities with readily determinable fair values, are
classified as available for sale and recorded at fair value, with unrealized gains and losses
excluded from earnings and reported in other comprehensive income. Purchase premiums and discounts
are recognized in interest income using the interest method over the terms of the securities. Gains
and losses on the sale of securities are recorded on the trade date and are determined using the
specific identification method.
18
Table of Contents
NOTES TO UNAUDITED INTERIM CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Dollar amounts in thousands, except share data)
(Dollar amounts in thousands, except share data)
The recent accounting guidance amends the recognition guidance for other-than-temporary
impairments of debt securities and expands the financial statement disclosures for
other-than-temporary impairment losses on debt and equity securities. The recent guidance replaced
the intent and ability indication in current guidance by specifying that (a) if a company does
not have the intent to sell a debt security prior to recovery and (b) it is more likely than not
that it will not have to sell the debt security prior to recovery, the security would not be
considered other-than-temporarily impaired unless there is a credit loss. When an entity does not
intend to sell the security, and it is more likely than not the entity will not have to sell the
security before recovery of its cost basis, it will recognize the credit component of an
other-than-temporary impairment of a debt security in earnings and the remaining portion in other
comprehensive income. For held-to-maturity debt securities, the amount of an other-than-temporary
impairment recorded in other comprehensive income for the noncredit portion of a previous
other-than-temporary impairment should be amortized prospectively over the remaining life of the
security on the basis of the timing of future estimated cash flows of the security.
As a result of this guidance, Parkvales consolidated statements of operations as of March 31, 2011
and March 31, 2010 reflect the full impairment (that is, the difference between the securitys
amortized cost basis and fair value) on debt securities that Parkvale intends to sell or would
more-likely-than-not be required to sell before the expected recovery of the amortized cost basis.
For available-for-sale and held-to-maturity debt securities that management has no intent to sell
and believes that it more-likely-than-not will not be required to sell prior to recovery, only the
credit loss component of the impairment is recognized in earnings, while the non-credit loss is
recognized in other comprehensive income, net of applicable taxes.
For equity securities, when Parkvale has decided to sell an impaired available-for-sale security
and Parkvale does not expect the fair value of the security to fully recover before the expected
time of sale, the security is deemed other-than-temporarily impaired in the period in which the
decision to sell is made. Parkvale recognizes an impairment loss when the impairment is deemed
other-than-temporary even if a decision to sell has not been made.
19
Table of Contents
NOTES TO UNAUDITED INTERIM CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Dollar amounts in thousands, except share data)
(Dollar amounts in thousands, except share data)
Federal Home Loan Bank Stock
Parkvale, as a member of the Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB) system, is required to maintain an
investment in capital stock of the FHLB. Based on redemption provisions of the FHLB, the stock has
no quoted market value and is carried at cost. In December 2008, the FHLB declared a moratorium on
the redemption of its stock. At its discretion, the FHLB may declare dividends on the stock.
However, since 2009 the FHLB suspended its dividend. Management reviews for impairment based on the
ultimate recoverability of the cost basis in the FHLB stock.
Members do not purchase stock in the FHLB for the same reasons that traditional equity investors
acquire stock in an investor-owned enterprise. Rather, members purchase stock to obtain access to
the low-cost products and services offered by the FHLB. Unlike equity securities of traditional
for-profit enterprises, the stock of FHLB does not provide its holders with an opportunity for
capital appreciation because, by regulation, FHLB stock can only be purchased, redeemed and
transferred at par value.
The Banks FHLB stock totaled $12,958 at March 31, 2011 and $14,357 at June 30, 2010. The Bank
accounts for the stock based on U.S. GAAP, which requires the investment to be carried at cost and
evaluated for impairment based on the ultimate recoverability of the par value.
The Bank periodically evaluates its FHLB investment for possible impairment based on, among other
things, the capital adequacy of the FHLB and its overall financial condition. The FHLB exceeds all
regulatory capital requirements established by the Federal Housing Finance Agency, the regulator of
the FHLB. Failure by the FHLB to meet this regulatory capital requirement would require an in-depth
analysis of other factors including:
| the members ability to access liquidity from the FHLB; | ||
| the members funding cost advantage with the FHLB compared to alternative sources of funds; | ||
| a decline in the market value of FHLBs net assets relative to book value which may or may not affect future financial performance or cash flow; | ||
| the FHLBs ability to obtain credit and source liquidity, for which one indicator is the credit rating of the FHLB; | ||
| the FHLBs commitment to make payments taking into account its ability to meet statutory and regulatory payment obligations and the level of such payments in relation to the FHLBs operating performance; and | ||
| the prospects of amendments to laws that affect the rights and obligations of the FHLB. |
The Bank believes its holdings in the stock are ultimately recoverable at par value at March 31,
2011 and, therefore, determined that FHLB stock was not other-than-temporarily impaired. In
addition, the Bank has ample liquidity and does not require redemption of its FHLB stock in the
foreseeable future.
20
Table of Contents
NOTES TO UNAUDITED INTERIM CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Dollar amounts in thousands, except share data)
(Dollar amounts in thousands, except share data)
At March 31, 2011 and June 30, 2010, the following comprises Parkvales investment portfolio:
March 31, 2011 | June 30, 2010 | |||||||||||||||
Available for Sale Investments | Amortized Cost | Fair Value | Amortized Cost | Fair Value | ||||||||||||
CMOs Non Agency (Residential) |
| | $ | 59,804 | $ | 59,804 | ||||||||||
Mutual Funds ARM mortgages |
5,500 | 5,242 | 5,500 | 5,284 | ||||||||||||
Common equities |
1 | 1 | 474 | 682 | ||||||||||||
Total available for sale investments |
$ | 5,501 | $ | 5,243 | $ | 65,778 | $ | 65,770 | ||||||||
March 31, 2011 | June 30, 2010 | |||||||||||||||
Held to Maturity Investments | Amortized Cost | Fair Value | Amortized Cost | Fair Value | ||||||||||||
U.S. Government and agency obligations |
$ | 148,232 | $ | 148,135 | $ | 194,248 | $ | 195,920 | ||||||||
Municipal obligations |
27,478 | 27,881 | 21,641 | 22,345 | ||||||||||||
Corporate debt: |
||||||||||||||||
Short to medium term corporate debt |
30,607 | 31,539 | 27,112 | 28,352 | ||||||||||||
Pooled trust preferred securities |
21,182 | 17,590 | 24,229 | 16,849 | ||||||||||||
Individual trust preferred securities |
9,340 | 8,459 | 9,322 | 7,977 | ||||||||||||
Mortgage-backed securities: |
||||||||||||||||
Agency |
179,412 | 180,076 | 93,248 | 95,055 | ||||||||||||
Agency Collateralized Mortgage Obligations
(CMOs) |
8,124 | 8,262 | 10,357 | 10,630 | ||||||||||||
CMOs non agency |
59,848 | 59,140 | 63,295 | 60,803 | ||||||||||||
Total held to maturity investments |
$ | 484,223 | $ | 481,082 | $ | 443,452 | $ | 437,931 | ||||||||
The amortized cost and fair value of debt securities at March 31, 2011, by contractual
maturity, is included in the table below. Expected maturities will differ from contractual
maturities because the borrowers may have the right to call or prepay the obligation.
Amortized | ||||||||
Cost | Fair Value | |||||||
Due in one year or less |
$ | 12,515 | $ | 12,665 | ||||
Due after one year through five years |
96,887 | 98,440 | ||||||
Due after five years through ten years |
125,706 | 125,058 | ||||||
Due after ten years |
249,115 | 244,919 | ||||||
Total debt securities |
$ | 484,223 | $ | 481,082 | ||||
Liquidity concerns in the financial markets have made it difficult to obtain reliable market
quotations on some infrequently traded securities that are held to maturity. Corporate debt has
been valued using financial models permitted by guidance in Accounting Standards Codification
(ASC) 820 for Level III (see Fair Value Note) assets as active markets did not exist at March 31,
2011 and June 30, 2010 to provide reliable market quotes. The assets included in Level III pricing
relate to pooled trust preferred securities. The trust preferred market has been severely impacted
by the deteriorating economy and the lack of liquidity in the credit markets.
21
Table of Contents
NOTES TO UNAUDITED INTERIM CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Dollar amounts in thousands, except share data)
(Dollar amounts in thousands, except share data)
The unrealized losses on investments are primarily the result of volatility in interest rates,
changes in spreads over treasuries and certain investments falling out of favor with investors due
to illiquidity in the financial markets. Based on the credit-worthiness of the issuers and
discounted cash flow analyses, management determined that the remaining investments in debt and
equity securities were not other-than-temporarily impaired. The following table represents gross
unrealized losses and fair value of investments aggregated by investment category and length of
time that individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position at March 31,
2011:
Less than 12 months | Greater than 12 months | |||||||||||||||||||||||
of unrealized losses | of unrealized losses | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Unrealized | Unrealized | Unrealized | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Available for Sale Investments | Fair Value | loss | Fair Value | loss | Fair Value | loss | ||||||||||||||||||
Mutual funds ARM mortgages |
$ | | $ | | $ | 5,242 | $ | 258 | $ | 5,242 | $ | 258 | ||||||||||||
Held to Maturity Investments |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
U.S. Government and agency
obligations |
86,742 | 862 | | | 86,742 | 862 | ||||||||||||||||||
Municipal obligations |
10,668 | 116 | | | 10,668 | 116 | ||||||||||||||||||
Corporate debt |
9,167 | 69 | | | 9,167 | 69 | ||||||||||||||||||
Pooled trust preferred securities |
431 | 124 | 8,129 | 6,516 | 8,560 | 6,640 | ||||||||||||||||||
Individual trust preferred securities |
| | 5,109 | 1,020 | 5,109 | 1,020 | ||||||||||||||||||
Non agency CMOs |
104 | 31 | 19,915 | 2,977 | 20,019 | 3,008 | ||||||||||||||||||
Mortgage-backed securities |
101,292 | 1,326 | 22 | 1 | 101,314 | 1,327 | ||||||||||||||||||
Totals |
$ | 208,404 | $ | 2,528 | $ | 38,417 | $ | 10,772 | $ | 246,821 | $ | 13,300 | ||||||||||||
The following table represents gross unrealized losses and fair value of investments
aggregated by investment category and length of time that individual securities have been in a
continuous unrealized loss position at June 30, 2010:
Less than 12 months | Greater than 12 months | |||||||||||||||||||||||
of unrealized losses | of unrealized losses | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Unrealized | Unrealized | Unrealized | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Available for Sale Investments | Fair Value | loss | Fair Value | loss | Fair Value | loss | ||||||||||||||||||
Mutual funds ARM mortgages |
$ | | $ | | $ | 4,760 | $ | 240 | $ | 4,760 | $ | 240 | ||||||||||||
Held to Maturity Investments |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
U.S. Government and agency
obligations |
29,990 | 9 | | | 29,990 | 9 | ||||||||||||||||||
Pooled trust preferred securities |
| | 10,197 | 7,380 | 10,197 | 7,380 | ||||||||||||||||||
Individual trust preferred securities |
| | 5,054 | 1,550 | 5,054 | 1,550 | ||||||||||||||||||
Non agency CMOs |
| | 18,024 | 4,879 | 18,024 | 4,879 | ||||||||||||||||||
Mortgage-backed securities |
5,300 | 47 | | | 5,300 | 47 | ||||||||||||||||||
Totals |
$ | 35,290 | $ | 56 | $ | 38,035 | $ | 14,049 | $ | 73,325 | $ | 14,105 | ||||||||||||
22
Table of Contents
NOTES TO UNAUDITED INTERIM CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Dollar amounts in thousands, except share data)
(Dollar amounts in thousands, except share data)
Available for sale investments.
Mutual Funds. Parkvale has investments in two adjustable rate mortgage mutual funds with an
aggregate amortized cost of $5,500 at March 31, 2011. The larger of the two investments, which had
a fair value of $5,242 at March 31, 2011, has had an unrealized loss in excess of one year of $258
and $240 at March 31, 2011 and at June 30, 2010, respectively. Parkvale evaluated the near-term
prospects of the issuer of the mutual fund in relation to the severity and duration of the
impairment. Based on this evaluation and Parkvales ability to hold the investment for a reasonable
period of time sufficient for a forecasted recovery of fair value, Parkvale does not consider the
remaining value of this investment to be other-than-temporarily impaired at March 31, 2011.
Common Equities. At March 31, 2011, Parkvale had investments in three different common equities,
which had an aggregate amortized cost of $1 and an aggregate fair value of $1 at March 31, 2011 and
an aggregate amortized cost of $474 and an aggregate fair value of $682 at June 30, 2010.
Held to maturity securities.
U.S. Government and Agency Obligations. At March 31, 2011, the $148,135 fair value of Parkvales
investments in U.S. Government and Agency obligations was slightly lower than the $148,232
amortized cost of such investments. Certain of these investments show unrealized losses of less
than one year of $862 at the balance sheet date. The contractual terms of those investments do not
permit the issuer to settle the securities at a price less than the face value of the investment.
Parkvale intends to hold these securities to the contractual maturity of such investments and it is
more likely than not that Parkvale will not be required to sell the investments before recovery of
its amortized cost.
Trust Preferred Securities. Trust preferred securities are very long-term (usually 30-year
maturity) instruments with characteristics of both debt and equity. Most of the Corporations
investments in trust preferred securities are of pooled issues, each made up of 23 or more
companies with geographic and size diversification. Unless otherwise noted, the Corporations
pooled trust preferred securities are substantially secured by bank and thrift holding companies
(approximately 85% in the aggregate) and by insurance companies (approximately 15% in the
aggregate). No single company represents more 5% of any individual pooled offering. While certain
companies are in more than one pool, no single company represents more than a 5% interest in the
aggregate pooled investments. The pooled trust preferred investments were all investment grade at
purchase with an initial average investment grade rating of A. As a result of the overall credit
market and the number of underlying issuers deferring interest payments, as well as issuers
defaulting, the rating agencies have downgraded the securities to below investment grade as of
March 31, 2011. All of these investments are classified as held to maturity.
23
Table of Contents
NOTES TO UNAUDITED INTERIM CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Dollar amounts in thousands, except share data)
(Dollar amounts in thousands, except share data)
Management believes trust preferred valuations have been negatively affected by an inactive
market and concerns that the underlying banks and insurance companies may have significant exposure
to losses from sub-prime mortgages, defaulted collateralized debt obligations or other concerns.
When evaluating these investments, a determination is made of the credit portion and the noncredit
portion of impairment. The credit portion is recognized in earnings and represents the expected
shortfall in future cash flows. The noncredit portion is recognized in other comprehensive income
and represents the difference between the fair value of the security and the amount of credit
related impairment, which is discussed in the following paragraphs. A discounted cash flow analysis
provides the best estimate of the credit related portion of the impairment for these securities.
Parkvales pooled trust preferred collateralized debt obligations are measured for other than
temporary impairment within the scope of US GAAP, by determining whether it is probable that an
adverse change in estimated cash flows has occurred. The discounted cash flow analysis is
considered to be the primary evidence when determining whether credit related impairment exists.
Managements estimates and results of a discounted cash flow test are significantly affected by
other variables such as the estimate of future cash flows, credit worthiness of the underlying
banks and insurance companies (issuer) and determination of probability of default of the
underlying collateral. Changes in the variable assumptions could produce different conclusions for
each security. Current available information is evaluated in estimating the future cash flows of
these securities and a determination is made regarding whether or not there have been favorable or
adverse changes in estimated cash flows from the cash flows previously projected. Consideration is
given to the structure and term of the pool and the financial condition of the underlying issuers.
Specifically, the evaluation incorporates factors such as over-collateralization and interest
coverage tests, interest rates and appropriate risk premiums, the timing and amount of interest and
principal payments and the allocation of payments to the various tranches. Current estimates of
cash flows are based on the most recent trustee reports, announcements of deferrals or defaults,
and assumptions regarding expected future default rates, prepayment and recovery rates and other
relevant information. In constructing these assumptions, the following is considered:
| that current defaults would have no recovery; | ||
| that some individually analyzed deferrals will cure at rates varying from 10% to 90% after the deferral period ends; | ||
| recent historical performance metrics, including profitability, capital ratios, loan charge-offs and loan reserve ratios, for the underlying institutions that would indicate a higher probability of default by the institution; | ||
| that institutions identified as possessing a higher probability of default would recover at a rate of 10% for banks and 15% for insurance companies; | ||
| that financial performance of the financial sector continues to be affected by the economic environment resulting in an expectation of additional deferrals and defaults in the future; | ||
| whether the security is currently deferring interest; and | ||
| the external rating of the security and recent changes to its external rating. |
24
Table of Contents
NOTES TO UNAUDITED INTERIM CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Dollar amounts in thousands, except share data)
(Dollar amounts in thousands, except share data)
In addition to the above factors, the excess subordination levels for each pooled trust
preferred security are calculated. The results of this excess subordination allows management to
identify those pools that are a greater risk for a future break in cash flows so that issuers in
those pools can be monitored more closely for potential deterioration of credit quality.
A significant portion of the Corporations unrealized losses relate primarily to investments in
trust preferred securities, which consist of single issuer and pooled securities. The portfolio of
trust preferred collateralized debt obligations consists of 16 pooled issues and 8 single issuer
securities. The single issuer securities are primarily from Pennsylvania regional banks.
Investments in pooled securities are primarily mezzanine tranches, except for 2 investments in
senior tranches, and are secured by over-collateralization or default protection provided by
subordinated tranches.
At March 31, 2011, the 16 pooled trust preferred securities have an amortized cost basis of $21,182
and an estimated fair value of $17,590, while the single-issuer trust preferred securities have an
amortized cost basis of $9,340 and an estimated fair value of $8,459. The net unrealized losses on
the trust preferred securities at March 31, 2011, which aggregated $3,592 on the pooled securities
and $881 on the individual securities, are attributable to temporary illiquidity and the
uncertainty affecting these markets, as well as changes in interest rates.
At March 31, 2011, as permitted by the debt instruments, there are 11 pooled trust preferred
securities with an amortized cost basis of $7,982 that have for one reason or another chosen to
defer payments. Interest payments aggregating $465 have been capitalized to the balance of the
securities as permitted by the underlying trust agreement and interest payments aggregating $2,078
have been deferred since the respective securities began to defer payments. Deferred payments are
not included in interest income. Interest payments totaling $267 were deferred during the quarter
ended March 31, 2011 and no payments were capitalized during the quarter.
Contractual terms of the investments do not permit debtors to settle the security at a price less
than the face value of the investments and as such, it is expected that the remaining trust
preferred securities will not be settled at a price less than the current carrying value of the
investments. The Corporation has concluded from detailed cash flow analysis performed as of March
31, 2011 that it is probable that all contractual principal and interest payments will be collected
on all of its single-issuer and pooled trust preferred securities, except for those on which OTTI
was recognized on the pooled trust preferred securities.
Because Parkvale has the ability and intent to hold the investments until a recovery of fair value,
which may be maturity, and it is more likely than not that Parkvale will not be required to sell
the investments before recovery of its amortized cost, Parkvale does not consider the remaining
value of these assets to be other-than-temporarily impaired at March 31, 2011. However, continued
interest deferrals and/or insolvencies by participating issuers could result in a further writedown
of one or more of the trust preferred investments in the future.
25
Table of Contents
NOTES TO UNAUDITED INTERIM CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Dollar amounts in thousands, except share data)
(Dollar amounts in thousands, except share data)
The following table provides information relating to the Corporations trust preferred securities
as of March 31, 2011.
Excess | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Expected | Subordination | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Actual | Defaults | (as a % of | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Unrealized Gain | Lowest Credit | # of | Actual | Deferral % | (% of performing | performing | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Deal | Note Class | Par Value | Amortized Cost | Fair Value | (Loss) | Ratings | Issuers | Default % (1) | (1) (2) | collateral) (3) | collateral) (4) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pooled Investments |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
P1 |
C1 | 5,000 | 350 | 777 | 427 | C | 69 | 20.5 | % | 19.0 | % | 14.0 | % | 0.0 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
P2 |
A2A | 5,000 | 2,020 | 2,517 | 497 | CCC- | 64 | 1.8 | % | 22.0 | % | 13.9 | % | 9.5 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
P3 |
C1 | 4,592 | 736 | 1,145 | 409 | C | 85 | 1.6 | % | 7.4 | % | 14.8 | % | 0.0 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
P4 |
C1 | 5,058 | 354 | 1,062 | 708 | C | 72 | 0.0 | % | 11.2 | % | 14.8 | % | 0.0 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
P5 |
C1 | 5,023 | 151 | 348 | 197 | C | 93 | 13.3 | % | 17.4 | % | 14.2 | % | 0.0 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
P6 |
C1 | 3,075 | 31 | 62 | 31 | C | 68 | 19.1 | % | 16.9 | % | 15.0 | % | 0.0 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
P8 |
C | 3,219 | 128 | 190 | 62 | C | 56 | 1.2 | % | 18.6 | % | 13.3 | % | 0.0 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
P9 |
B | 2,008 | 80 | 424 | 344 | C | 54 | 12.2 | % | 26.4 | % | 11.8 | % | 0.0 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
P10 |
B1 | 5,000 | 4,885 | 2,580 | (2,305 | ) | CCC | 24 | 0.0 | % | 5.8 | % | 11.1 | % | 11.3 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
P11 |
Mezz | 1,500 | 555 | 431 | (124 | ) | C | 23 | 18.8 | % | 21.1 | % | 8.4 | % | 0.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
P12 |
B2 | 1,005 | 293 | 323 | 30 | C | 33 | 14.6 | % | 16.1 | % | 11.4 | % | 0.0 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
P13 |
B | 3,909 | 3,759 | 1,080 | (2,679 | ) | C | 45 | 14.4 | % | 16.2 | % | 13.5 | % | 0.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
P14 |
A1 | 4,618 | 4,301 | 2,913 | (1,388 | ) | CCC | 50 | 20.3 | % | 9.2 | % | 13.9 | % | 28.2 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
P15 |
B | 5,000 | 1,700 | 1,556 | (144 | ) | C | 34 | 25.5 | % | 12.2 | % | 16.7 | % | 0.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
P16 |
C1 | 5,000 | 1,089 | 1,089 | | C | 45 | 17.2 | % | 11.1 | % | 10.9 | % | 0.0 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
P17 |
C1 | 5,000 | 750 | 1,093 | 343 | C | 42 | 18.5 | % | 15.5 | % | 10.6 | % | 0.0 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subtotal |
16 | 64,007 | 21,182 | 17,590 | (3,592 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Single Issuer
Investments |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
S1 |
N/A | 1,000 | 931 | 770 | (161 | ) | BB+ | 1 | 0.0 | % | 0.0 | % | 0.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
S2 |
N/A | 2,000 | 1,970 | 1,541 | (429 | ) | BB+ | 1 | 0.0 | % | 0.0 | % | 0.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
S3 |
N/A | 3,000 | 2,781 | 2,443 | (338 | ) | A- | 1 | 0.0 | % | 0.0 | % | 0.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
S4 |
N/A | 500 | 447 | 355 | (92 | ) | BB- | 1 | 0.0 | % | 0.0 | % | 0.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
S5 |
N/A | 1,000 | 1,005 | 1,082 | 77 | NR | 1 | 0.0 | % | 0.0 | % | 0.0 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
S6 |
N/A | 700 | 710 | 722 | 12 | NR | 1 | 0.0 | % | 0.0 | % | 0.0 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
S7 |
N/A | 529 | 496 | 540 | 44 | B+ | 1 | 0.0 | % | 0.0 | % | 0.0 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
S8 |
N/A | 1,000 | 1,000 | 1,006 | 6 | BB+ | 1 | 0.0 | % | 0.0 | % | 0.0 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subtotal |
8 | 9,729 | 9,340 | 8,459 | (881 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Grand total of
Trust Preferred
holdings |
73,736 | 30,522 | 26,049 | (4,473 | ) |
The above listings do not include 7 trust preferred investments written off in prior periods.
Notes:
(1) | As a percentage of the total collateral. | |
(2) | Includes deferrals that have not paid current interest payments as permitted by the debt instruments. | |
(3) | Expected defaults are determined by an analysis of each security. | |
(4) | Excess subordination measures the performing collateral coverage of the outstanding liabilities (as a % of performing collateral). |
26
Table of Contents
NOTES TO UNAUDITED INTERIM CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Dollar amounts in thousands, except share data)
(Dollar amounts in thousands, except share data)
Non agency CMOs. The non agency CMO securities of $59,848 at March 31, 2011 are supported by
underlying collateral that was originated as follows:
Year originated | Amortized Cost | Fair Value | ||||||
2003 |
$ | 18,609 | $ | 20,222 | ||||
2004 |
27,778 | 26,619 | ||||||
2005 |
3,934 | 4,125 | ||||||
2007 |
5,787 | 4,433 | ||||||
2008 |
3,740 | 3,741 | ||||||
$ | 59,848 | $ | 59,140 | |||||
The non agency CMO portfolio at March 31, 2011 contains investments that were all rated AAA at
the time of purchase. The amortized cost and fair value by their latest investment rating at March
31, 2011 is as follows:
Amortized | ||||||||
Cost | Fair Value | |||||||
AAA by Moodys, S&P, or Fitch |
$ | 22,327 | $ | 23,301 | ||||
AA by Moodys or S&P |
5,882 | 6,328 | ||||||
A by Moodys, S&P, or Fitch |
3,740 | 3,741 | ||||||
Baa by Moodys |
4,871 | 5,751 | ||||||
BB by S&P |
17,106 | 15,482 | ||||||
B by Finch |
3,178 | 2,689 | ||||||
CCC by Fitch |
2,609 | 1,744 | ||||||
D by S&P |
135 | 104 | ||||||
$ | 59,848 | $ | 59,140 | |||||
To date, with the exception of one security with an amortized cost of $134, all such
securities have made scheduled payments of principal and interest on a timely basis with additional
collateral provided by support tranches in these structured debt obligations. OTTI charges of
$1,800 were recognized in prior periods regarding the security for which scheduled payments were
not received.
General. At March 31, 2011, Parkvale has unrealized losses that are greater than one year
aggregating $10,514 on held to maturity securities. These unrealized losses over one year relate
primarily to investments in pooled and individual trust preferred securities and non-agency CMOs as
detailed in the preceding tables. The unrealized losses relate to illiquidity and the uncertainty
affecting these markets, interest rate changes, higher spreads to treasuries at March 31, 2011
compared to the purchase dates and concerns of future bank failures. Pooled trust preferred
securities with unrealized losses for more than 12 months relate to 4 pooled trust preferred
securities aggregating $14,645, representing $8,129 of fair value with $6,516 of unrealized losses.
Individual trust preferred securities with unrealized losses for more than 12 months relate to 4
individual securities aggregating $6,129, representing $5,109 of fair value with $1,020 of
unrealized losses.
27
Table of Contents
NOTES TO UNAUDITED INTERIM CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Dollar amounts in thousands, except share data)
(Dollar amounts in thousands, except share data)
Other-Than-Temporary- Impairment
Securities with a remaining carrying value as of March 31, 2011 that have incurred OTTI charges are
summarized as follows:
Unadjusted | OTTI | OTTI | 3/31/11 | 3/31/11 | ||||||||||||||||
Carrying | Charge to | Charge to | Carrying | Fair | ||||||||||||||||
Security | Value | earnings | OCI | Value | Value | |||||||||||||||
Pooled trust preferred security |
$ | 48,857 | $ | 19,904 | $ | 20,718 | $ | 8,236 | $ | 11,016 |
The following chart shows the balance of other comprehensive income
charges related to fair value:
Pooled trust | ||||
preferred securities | ||||
Balance at June 30, 2010 |
$ | 19,868 | ||
Total losses realized/unrealized |
3,046 | |||
Included as a charge to earnings |
(2,197 | ) | ||
Change to other comprehensive income |
| |||
Balance at March 31, 2011 |
$ | 20,717 | ||
The following table displays the cumulative credit component of OTTI charges recognized in
earnings on debt securities for which a portion of an OTTI is recognized in other comprehensive
income at March 31, 2011:
Pooled trust | ||||
preferred securities | ||||
Balance at June 30, 2010 |
$ | 17,707 | ||
Addition for the credit component on
debt securities in which OTTI was not
previously recognized |
2,197 | |||
Balance at March 31, 2011 |
$ | 19,904 | ||
The amount of securities with OTTI charges to earnings are as follows: |
||||
Recorded in September 30, 2010 quarter |
$ | 996 | ||
Recorded in December 31, 2010 quarter |
946 | |||
Recorded in March 31, 2011 quarter |
255 |
During the March 31, 2010 quarter, two pooled trust preferred securities and three non agency
CMO securities considered to be other than temporarily impaired were written down to fair value
with a net charge to earnings of $1,044. During the three months ended March 31, 2011, charges of
$255 on OTTI investments were recognized as net impairment losses in earnings. The current quarter
charges were due to OTTI related to two pooled trust preferred securities. Write-downs were based
on individual securities credit performance and the issuers inability to make its contractual
principal and interest payments. Should credit quality continue to deteriorate, it is possible that
additional write-downs may be required. Based on the credit worthiness of the issuers, management
determined that the remaining investments in debt and equity securities were not
other-than-temporarily impaired at March 31, 2011.
28
Table of Contents
NOTES TO UNAUDITED INTERIM CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Dollar amounts in thousands, except share data)
(Dollar amounts in thousands, except share data)
NOTE 8. GOODWILL AND MARKET VALUATION
Goodwill of $25,634 shown on the Statement of Financial Condition relates to acquisitions in fiscal
2002 (Masontown) and 2005 (Advance). The operations of both acquisitions have been fully integrated
into Parkvales operations. All of the offices and business activities of both Masontown and
Advance have been retained, remain open and are performing as expected. The market price of
Parkvales common stock was $9.75 per share at March 31, 2011, which is below the book value of
$16.50 at such date. The difference between the market value and the book value at March 31, 2011
is primarily related to the significant deterioration in the financial markets, a weakening economy
and a near global credit crisis. Goodwill is tested on an annual basis as of June 30 of each year
in conjunction with the Corporations fiscal year end but can be tested for impairment at any time
if circumstances warrant.
Because the market value of Parkvales common stock has been below the book value during fiscal
2011, an independent third party was retained during the December 31, 2010 quarter to assist in
determining whether an impairment of goodwill was appropriate. In a report dated January 13, 2011,
the third party certified goodwill non-impairment based on the discounted cash flow estimate of
fair value, and deal value to book value of equity ratios observed in recent comparable banking
sector merger and acquisition transactions. Anecdotal evidence for goodwill non-impairment is also
seen in the strong underlying financial foundations for Parkvales fair value. The third party
reviewed the premiums paid in acquisitions of financial institutions that were announced or
completed between October 1, 2007 and November 30, 2010. The third party reviewed the premiums paid
in 41 acquisitions in the mid-Atlantic states during such period, as well as 363 acquisitions
nationwide during such period. In addition to reviewing the book value multiples of all
acquisitions announced or completed during the above period, the third party also reviewed the
multiples for those acquisitions announced or completed since June 30, 2008, which were lower than
the multiples for the entire period noted above.
Based on the above report, management determined that goodwill was not impaired at March 31, 2011
or December 31, 2010. The annual testing of goodwill as required was performed as of June 30, 2010
and in a similar report issued by the independent third party on July 23, 2010, goodwill
non-impairment was certified as of June 30, 2010. If Parkvales stock continues to trade
significantly below its book value, if discounted cash flow estimates materially decline, or if the
multiples in other acquisitions of financial institutions continue to decline, then a goodwill
impairment charge may become appropriate in a future quarter.
29
Table of Contents
NOTES TO UNAUDITED INTERIM CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Dollar amounts in thousands, except share data)
(Dollar amounts in thousands, except share data)
NOTE 9. EARNINGS PER SHARE (EPS)
The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted earnings per share for the
three and nine months ended March 31:
Three months ended | Nine months ended | |||||||||||||||
March 31, | March 31, | |||||||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | |||||||||||||
Numerator for basic and diluted EPS: |
||||||||||||||||
Net income |
$ | 1,947 | $ | 1,418 | $ | 6,011 | $ | 4,698 | ||||||||
Less: Preferred stock dividend |
397 | 397 | 1,191 | 1,191 | ||||||||||||
Net income to common stockholders |
$ | 1,550 | $ | 1,021 | $ | 4,820 | $ | 3,507 | ||||||||
Denominator: |
||||||||||||||||
Weighted average shares for basic EPS |
5,582,407 | 5,527,818 | 5,547,111 | 5,461,373 | ||||||||||||
Effect of dilutive stock options |
2,808 | | 1,369 | | ||||||||||||
Weighted average shares for dilutive EPS |
5,585,215 | 5,527,818 | 5,548,480 | 5,461,373 | ||||||||||||
Net income per common share: |
||||||||||||||||
Basic |
$ | 0.28 | $ | 0.18 | $ | 0.87 | $ | 0.64 | ||||||||
Diluted |
$ | 0.28 | $ | 0.18 | $ | 0.87 | $ | 0.64 | ||||||||
NOTE 10. NEW ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
In July 2010, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards
Update (ASU) 2010-20, Receivables (Topic 310): Disclosures about the Credit Quality of Financing
Receivables and the Allowance for Credit Losses. The disclosures will provide financial statement
users with additional information about the nature of credit risks inherent in entities financing
receivables, how credit risk is analyzed and assessed when determining the allowance for credit
losses and the reasons for the change in the allowance for credit losses. This requirement is
effective for all periods ending on or after December 15, 2010, although certain disclosures will
have a deferred effective date. Parkvale has adopted the additional accounting standards and the
required additional disclosure, which have no impact on the consolidated financial statements.
On January 19, 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-10: Receivables (Topic 310) Deferral of the Effective
Date of Disclosures about Troubled Debt Restructurings in Update 2010 -20. The disclosures
associated with ASU 2010-20 were originally scheduled to be effective for public entities for the
periods beginning on or after December 15, 2010. Due to significant stakeholder concerns, the
disclosures relating to Troubled Debt Restructuring have been deferred to a later date, anticipated
to be effective for interim and annual periods ending after June 15, 2011. The adoption of this
standard is not anticipated to have a material effect on the financial statements, results of
operations or liquidity of the Corporation.
On April 5, 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-02: A Creditors Determination of Whether a
Restructuring is a Troubled Debt Restructuring. The ASU is clarifying when a loan modification or
restructuring is considered a troubled debt restructuring. The guidance is effective for the first
interim period beginning on or after June 15, 2011, and should be applied retrospectively to the
beginning of the annual period of adoption. For purposes of measuring impairment on newly
considered impaired receivables an entity should apply the guidance prospectively in the first
interim period beginning on or after June 15, 2011. The disclosures relating to troubled debt
restructurings will be required in the first interim period beginning on or after June 15, 2011.
The adoption of this ASU is not expected to have a material impact on the Corporations
consolidated financial statements.
30
Table of Contents
On December 20, 2010, the FASB issued ASU No. 2010-28, Intangibles-Goodwill and Other (Topic 350),
When to Perform Step 2 of the Goodwill Impairment Test for Reporting Units with Zero or Negative
Carrying Amounts. This ASU is a consensus of the FASB Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF). The
amendments are effective for public entities for fiscal years, and interim periods, beginning after
December 15, 2010. Early adoption is not permitted. Non-public entities have an additional year to
comply (December 15, 2011). For public entities, the disclosures as of the end of a reporting
period are effective for interim and annual reporting periods ending on or after December 15, 2010.
The disclosures about activity that occurs during a reporting period are effective for interim and
annual reporting periods beginning on or after December 15, 2010. The adoption of this standard is
not anticipated to have a material effect on the financial statements, results of operations or
liquidity of the Corporation.
Item 2.
PARKVALE FINANCIAL CORPORATION
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following is managements discussion and analysis of the significant changes in the results of
operations, capital resources and liquidity presented in the accompanying consolidated financial
statements for Parkvale Financial Corporation. The Corporations consolidated financial condition
and results of operations consist almost entirely of Parkvale Banks financial condition and
results of operations. Current performance does not guarantee, and may not be indicative of,
similar performance in the future. The financial statements as of and for the quarter ended March
31, 2011 are unaudited and, as such, are subject to year-end audit review.
Forward-Looking Statements:
In addition to historical information, this filing may contain forward-looking statements. We have
made forward-looking statements in this document that are subject to risks and uncertainties.
Forward-looking statements include the information concerning possible or assumed future results of
operations of the Corporation and its subsidiaries. When we use words such as believe, expect,
anticipate or similar expressions, we are making forward-looking statements.
The statements in this filing that are not historical fact are forward-looking statements.
Forward-looking information should not be construed as guarantees of future performance. Actual
results may differ from expectations contained in such forward-looking information as a result of
various factors, including but not limited to the interest rate environment, economic policy or
conditions, federal and state banking and tax regulations and competitive factors in the
marketplace. Each of these factors could affect estimates, assumptions, uncertainties and risks
considered in the development of forward-looking information and could cause actual results to
differ materially from managements expectations regarding future performance.
Shareholders should note that many factors, some of which are discussed elsewhere in this document,
could affect the future financial results of the Corporation and its subsidiaries and could cause
those results to differ materially from those expressed in our forward-looking statements contained
in this document. These factors include the following: operating, legal and regulatory risks;
economic, political and competitive forces affecting our businesses; and the risk that our analyses
of these risks and forces could be incorrect and/or that the strategies developed to address them
could be unsuccessful.
31
Table of Contents
Critical Accounting Policies, Judgments and Estimates:
The accounting and reporting policies of the Corporation and its subsidiaries conform to accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America (U.S. GAAP) and general practices
within the financial services industry. All significant inter-company transactions are eliminated
in consolidation, and certain reclassifications are made when necessary to conform the previous
years financial statements to the current years presentation. In preparing the consolidated
financial statements, management is required to make estimates and assumptions that affect the
reported amount of assets and liabilities as of the dates of the balance sheets and revenues and
expenditures for the periods presented. Therefore, actual results could differ significantly from
those estimates. Accounting policies involving significant judgments and assumptions by management,
which have or could have a material impact on the carrying value of certain assets or comprehensive
income, are considered critical accounting policies. The Corporation recognizes the following as
critical accounting policies: Allowance for Loan Loss, Carrying Value of Investment Securities,
Valuation of Foreclosed Real Estate, Carrying Value of Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets and
Valuation Allowance of Deferred Tax Asset.
The Corporations critical accounting policies and judgments disclosures are contained in the
Corporations June 30, 2010 Annual Report filed on September 13, 2010, as amended on November 12,
2010. Management believes that there have been no material changes since June 30, 2010 except for
adoption of FASB ASU 2010-20 during the quarter ended December 31, 2010. The Corporation has not
substantively changed its application of the foregoing policies, and there have been no material
changes in assumptions or estimation techniques used as compared to prior periods.
Balance Sheet Data:
March 31, | ||||||||
(Dollar amounts in thousands, except per share data) | 2011 | 2010 | ||||||
Total assets |
$ | 1,801,292 | $ | 1,896,225 | ||||
Loans, net |
998,936 | 1,033,004 | ||||||
Interest-earning deposits and federal funds sold |
160,053 | 152,621 | ||||||
Total investments |
489,466 | 571,495 | ||||||
Deposits |
1,480,886 | 1,513,442 | ||||||
FHLB advances |
150,862 | 186,030 | ||||||
Shareholders equity |
123,864 | 148,955 | ||||||
Book value per common share |
$ | 16.50 | $ | 21.19 |
Statistical Profile:
Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
March 31, (1) | March 31, (1) | |||||||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | |||||||||||||
Average yield earned on all interest-earning assets
|
3.85 | % | 4.20 | % | 3.91 | % | 4.32 | % | ||||||||
Average rate paid on all interest-bearing liabilities
|
1.65 | 2.07 | 1.74 | 2.30 | ||||||||||||
Average interest rate spread
|
2.20 | 2.13 | 2.17 | 2.02 | ||||||||||||
Net yield on average interest-earning assets
|
2.19 | 2.12 | 2.16 | 2.07 | ||||||||||||
Other expenses to average assets
|
1.74 | 1.65 | 1.72 | 1.59 | ||||||||||||
Taxes to pre-tax income
|
30.27 | 24.97 | 24.99 | 13.22 | ||||||||||||
Dividend payout ratio
|
7.14 | 27.78 | 6.90 | 23.44 | ||||||||||||
Return on average assets
|
0.43 | 0.30 | 0.44 | 0.33 | ||||||||||||
Return on average equity
|
5.71 | 3.68 | 5.95 | 4.10 | ||||||||||||
Average equity to average total assets
|
7.58 | 8.11 | 7.39 | 7.99 | ||||||||||||
Dividends per share
|
$ | 0.02 | $ | 0.05 | $ | 0.06 | $ | 0.15 |
32
Table of Contents
At March 31, | ||||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
One year gap to total assets
|
9.58 | % | 13.12 | % | ||||
Intangibles to total equity
|
22.47 | 19.29 | ||||||
Ratio of nonperforming loans and foreclosed real estate to total assets
|
1.76 | 1.79 | ||||||
Number of full-service offices
|
47 | 47 |
(1) | The applicable income and expense figures have been annualized in calculating the percentages. |
Nonperforming Loans and Foreclosed Real Estate:
A weak national economy and to a lesser extent local housing sector and credit markets contributed
towards an increased level of non-performing assets, which peaked at September 30, 2009.
Nonperforming loans (delinquent 90 days or more) and real estate owned in the aggregate represented
1.76%, 1.91% and 1.79% of total assets at March 31, 2011, June 30, 2010 and March 31, 2010,
respectively. Such non-performing assets at March 31, 2011 have decreased to $31.8 million from
$35.2 million at June 30, 2010, and include $22.3 million of non-accrual loans. Please refer to the
loan charts and analysis in the notes to unaudited interim consolidated financial statements that
precede this section.
As of March 31, 2011, single-family mortgage loans delinquent 90 days or more include 50 loans
aggregating $20.4 million purchased from others and serviced by national service providers with a
cost basis ranging from $40,000 to $728,000 and 40 loans aggregating $2.9 million in Parkvales
retail market area. Of these total 90 loans, 9 have a cost basis of $500,000 or greater. Management
believes that the delinquent 1-4 family mortgage loans are adequately collateralized with the
exception of 39 loans aggregating $13.8 million, which have the necessary related allowances for
losses provided. Loans 180 days or more delinquent are individually evaluated for collateral values
in accordance with banking regulations with specific reserves recorded as appropriate.
At March 31, 2011, modifications have been performed at market terms on 126 1-4 family mortgage
loans totaling $20.3 million, primarily related to extension of maturity dates and extension of
interest-only payment periods of thirty-six months or less. These modified loans are all performing
at March 31, 2011. The discounted cash flow analysis related to these modifications results in an
insignificant impact over the life of the loan.
Commercial business loans 90 days or more delinquent of $1.2 million at March 31, 2011 include a
$799,000 relationship to a coal extraction and reclamation entity. The commercial relationship is
in the process of collection and management believes the facility is adequately collateralized.
Parkvale has $25.5 million of loans classified as substandard at March 31, 2011. The substandard
loans have exhibited signs of weakness, or have been recently modified or refinanced and are being
monitored to assess if new payment terms are followed by the borrowers. These loans have exhibited
characteristics which warrant special monitoring. Examples of these concerns include irregular
payment histories, questionable collateral values, investment properties having cash flows
insufficient to service debt, and other financial inadequacies of the borrower. These loans are
regularly monitored with efforts being directed towards resolving the underlying concerns and
achieving a performing status classification of such loans.
33
Table of Contents
Foreclosed real estate of $9.4 million at March 31, 2011 consists of $5.6 million of
single-family dwellings, including three units in a single-family residential development with a
net book value of $856,000. At March 31, 2011, foreclosed real estate also includes eight
commercial real estate properties with an aggregate value of $3.8 million, including two commercial
real estate properties with a net book value of $1.1 million formerly used as automobile
dealerships, a medical facility with a net book value of $1.1 million and a hospital with a net
book value of $982,000 that has ceased business operations. Foreclosed real estate properties are
recorded at the lower of the carrying amount or fair value of the property less costs to sell, with
reserves established when deemed necessary.
Loans are placed on nonaccrual status when, in managements judgment, the probability of collection
of principal and interest is deemed to be insufficient to warrant further accrual. When a loan is
placed on nonaccrual status, previously accrued but unpaid interest is deducted from interest
income. As a result, uncollected interest income is not included in earnings for nonaccrual loans.
The amount of interest income on nonaccrual loans that had not been recognized in interest income
was $1.3 million at March 31, 2011 and $1.1 million at March 31, 2010. Parkvale provides an
allowance for the loss of accrued but uncollected interest on mortgage, consumer and commercial
business loans that are 90 days or more contractually past due.
Allowance for Loan Losses:
The allowance for loan losses was $19.0 million at March 31, 2011, $19.2 million at June 30, 2010
and $17.7 million at March 31, 2010 or 1.87%, 1.83% and 1.68% of gross loans respectively. The
adequacy of the allowance for loan loss is determined by management through evaluation of the loss
probable on individual nonperforming, delinquent and high dollar loans, economic and business
trends, growth and composition of the loan portfolio and historical loss experience, as well as
other relevant factors.
Parkvale continually monitors the loan portfolio to identify potential portfolio risks and to
detect potential credit deterioration in the early stages. Reserves are then established based upon
the evaluation of the inherent risks in the loan portfolio. Changes to the levels of reserves are
made quarterly based upon perceived changes in risk. When evaluating the risk elements within the
loan portfolio, Parkvale has a substantial portion of the loans secured by real estate as noted in
the loan footnote. In addition to the $633.1 million of 1-4 family mortgage loans, the majority of
the consumer loans represent either second mortgages in the form of term loans and home equity
lines of credit or first lien positions on home loans. The Bank does not underwrite subprime loans,
negative amortization loans or discounted teaser rates on ARM loans. Included in the 1-4 family
mortgage portfolio is $471.1 of amortizing loans and $162.0 million of interest only loans as of
March 31, 2011. The initial interest only period for $62.0 million of the aggregate $162.0 million
has expired, and the loans are contractually amortizing at March 31, 2011. Originated adjustable
1-4 family mortgage loans are made at competitive market rates in the primary lending areas of the
Bank with add-on margins ranging from 250 to 300 basis points to either the constant maturity
treasury yields or Libor. Adjustable-rate 1-4 family mortgage loans purchased in the secondary
market that are serviced by national service providers are prudently underwritten with emphasis
placed on loans to value of less than 80% combined with high FICO scores. The purchased loan
portfolio is geographically diversified throughout the United States and is generally considered
well collateralized. Aside from the states where Parkvale has offices, no other state exceeds 5% of
the mortgage loan portfolio. While management believes the allowance is adequate to absorb
estimated credit losses in its existing loan portfolio, future adjustments may be necessary in
circumstances where economic conditions change and affect the assumptions used in evaluating the
adequacy of the allowance for loan losses.
34
Table of Contents
Liquidity and Capital Resources:
Federal funds sold increased $20.4 million or 15.1% from June 30, 2010 to March 31, 2011.
Investment securities held to maturity increased $40.8 million or 9.2% from June 30, 2010 to March
31, 2011, primarily due to purchases of agency mortgage-backed securities. Interest-earning
deposits in other institutions increased $3.0 million or 378.8%. Loans, net of allowance, decreased
$33.4 million or 3.2% from June 30, 2010 to March 31, 2011. The decrease in the loan portfolio was
primarily due to a $27.6 million or 4.2% decline in one-to-four family residential loans and a
decrease of $6.8 million or 19.4% in automobile loans. Deposits decreased $7.2 million or 0.5% from
June 30, 2010 to March 31, 2011, FHLB advances decreased $35.1 million or 18.8% due to the maturity
of six advances aggregating $35 million at costs of 4.12% to 6.05%, escrow for taxes and insurance
decreased $751,000 or 10.0% and other debt decreased $940,000 or 6.8%. Parkvale Banks FHLB advance
available maximum borrowing capacity is $706.6 million at March 31, 2011. If Parkvale were to
experience a deposit decrease in excess of the available cash resources and cash equivalents, the
FHLB and Federal Reserve could be utilized to fund a rapid decrease in deposits.
TARP Capital Purchase Program: On October 14, 2008, the United States Department of the Treasury
(the Treasury) announced a voluntary Capital Purchase Program (the CPP) under which the
Treasury will purchase senior preferred shares from qualifying financial institutions. The plan is
part of the $700 billion Emergency Economic Stabilization Act signed into law in October 2008.
On December 23, 2008, pursuant to the CPP established by the Treasury, Parkvale entered into a
Letter Agreement, which incorporates by reference the Securities Purchase Agreement Standard
Terms, with the Treasury (the Agreement), pursuant to which Parkvale issued and sold to the
Treasury for an aggregate purchase price of $31,762,000 in cash (i) 31,762 shares of its Fixed Rate
Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock, Series A, par value $1.00 per share, having a liquidation
preference of $1,000 per share (the Series A Preferred Stock), and (ii) a ten-year warrant to
purchase up to 376,327 shares of common stock, par value $1.00 per share, of Parkvale (Common
Stock), at an initial exercise price of $12.66 per share, subject to certain anti-dilution and
other adjustments (the Warrant).
The Series A Preferred Stock pays cumulative dividends at a rate of 5% per annum on the liquidation
preference for the first five years, and thereafter at a rate of 9% per annum. The Series A
Preferred Stock has no maturity date and ranks senior to the Common Stock (and pari passu with
Parkvales other authorized shares of preferred stock, of which no shares are currently
outstanding) with respect to the payment of dividends and distributions and amounts payable in the
unlikely event of any future liquidation or dissolution of Parkvale. Parkvale may redeem the Series
A Preferred Stock at a price of $1,000 per share plus accrued and unpaid dividends, subject to the
concurrence of the Treasury and its federal banking regulators. Prior to December 23, 2011, unless
the Corporation has redeemed the Series A Preferred Stock or the Treasury has transferred the
Series A Preferred Stock to a third party, the consent of the Treasury will be required for the
Corporation to increase its Common Stock dividend or repurchase its Common Stock or other equity or
capital securities, other than in certain circumstances specified in the Agreement.
The Warrant is immediately exercisable. The Warrant provides for an adjustment of the exercise
price and the number of shares of Common Stock issuable upon exercise pursuant to customary
anti-dilution provisions, such as upon stock splits or distributions of securities or other assets
to holders of Common Stock, and upon certain issuances of Common Stock at or below a specified
price relative to the then-current market price of Common Stock. The Warrant expires ten years from
the issuance date. Pursuant
35
Table of Contents
to the Agreement, the Treasury has agreed not to exercise voting power with respect to any shares
of Common Stock issued upon exercise of the Warrant.
Term Debt: On December 30, 2008, the Corporation entered into a Loan Agreement with PNC Bank,
National Association (PNC) for a term loan in the amount of $25.0 million (the Loan). The Loan
pays interest at a rate equal to LIBOR plus three hundred and twenty five basis points, payable
quarterly. Principal on the Loan is due and payable in fifteen consecutive quarterly payments of
$625,000, commencing on March 31, 2010, with the remaining outstanding balance, which is scheduled
to be $15,625,000, due and payable on December 31, 2013 (the Maturity Date). The outstanding
balance due under the credit facility may be repaid, at any time, in whole or in part at the
Corporations option. In connection with the Loan, the Corporation executed a Term Note, dated
December 30, 2008, to evidence the Loan and a Pledge Agreement, dated December 30, 2008, whereby
the Corporation granted PNC a security interest in the outstanding capital stock of Parkvale
Savings Bank, the wholly owned subsidiary of the Corporation. The Loan Agreement contains customary
and standard provisions regarding representations and warranties of the Corporation, covenants and
events of default. If the Corporation has an event of default, the interest rate of the loan may
increase by 2% during the period of default. The Corporation was in compliance with all terms and
conditions of the Loan Agreement, as amended, at March 31, 2011.
On January 7, 2009, the Corporation entered into swap arrangements with PNC to convert portions of
the LIBOR floating interest rates to fixed interest rates for three and five years. Under the swap
agreements after the effects of the add-on of 325 basis points to LIBOR, $5.0 million matures on
December 31, 2011 at a rate of 4.92% to 6.92% and an additional $15.0 million matures on December
31, 2013 at a rate of 5.41% to 7.41%.
In January 2009, the Corporation entered into interest rate swap contracts to modify the interest
rate characteristics of designated debt instruments from variable to fixed in order to reduce the
impact of changes in future cash flows due to interest rate changes. The Corporation hedged its
exposure to the variability of future cash flows for all forecasted transactions for a maximum of
three to five years for hedges converting an aggregate of $20.0 million in floating-rate debt to
fixed. The fair value of these derivatives, net of taxes, totals a loss of $262,000 at March 31,
2011, and is reported as a contra account in other liabilities and offset in accumulated other
comprehensive income for the effective portion of the derivatives. Ineffectiveness of these swaps,
if any, is recognized immediately in earnings. The change in value of these derivatives during the
quarter ended March 31, 2011 resulted in no adjustment to current earnings, as the swaps were
measured as effective.
Interest rate swap contracts involve the risk of dealing with counterparties and their ability to
meet contractual terms. When the fair value of a derivative instrument contract is positive, this
generally indicates that the counterparty or customer owes the Corporation, and results in credit
risk to the Corporation. When the fair value of a derivative instrument contract is negative, the
Corporation owes the customer or counterparty and therefore, has no credit risk.
Capital: Of the $56.8 million of gross proceeds from the sale of the Series A Preferred Stock and
the Loan from PNC, the Corporation contributed $50 million to the Bank as additional Tier 1 capital
at the Bank. As noted above, the PNC Loan is being repaid quarterly, with a final principal payment
of $15.6 million due on December 31, 2013, and the dividend rate on the Series A Preferred Stock
will increase from 5% to 9% per annum after the five-year anniversary date of the issuance of such
stock. The Bank
36
Table of Contents
may not pay any dividends to the Corporation unless the Bank receives prior non-objection of its
regulators.
Shareholders equity was $123.9 million or 6.88% of total assets at March 31, 2011. During the nine
months ended March 31, 2011, shareholders equity increased by $4.9 million due primarily to net
income of $6.0 million, offset by declaration of common and preferred stock dividends of $1.5
million. The other comprehensive loss is due primarily to non-credit related OTTI charges
recognized on held to maturity investment securities. The Corporation is restricted from
repurchasing additional shares of its Common Stock prior to December 23, 2011 unless it either
redeems the Series A Preferred Stock or receives the written consent of the Treasury.
The Bank is required to maintain Tier 1 (Core) capital equal to at least 4% of the institutions
adjusted total assets and Total (Supplementary) Risk-Based capital equal to at least 8% of its
risk-weighted assets. At March 31, 2011, Parkvale Bank was in compliance with all applicable
regulatory requirements, with Tier 1 Core, Tier 1 Risk-Based and Total Risk-Based ratios of 6.73%,
10.50% and 11.63%, respectively. The regulatory capital ratios for Parkvale Bank at March 31, 2011
are calculated as follows:
(Dollars in 000s)
Tier 1 | Tier 1 | Total | ||||||||||
Core | Risk-Based | Risk-Based | ||||||||||
Capital | Capital | Capital | ||||||||||
Equity capital (1) |
$ | 142,072 | $ | 142,072 | $ | 142,072 | ||||||
Less non-allowable intangible assets |
(27,829 | ) | (27,829 | ) | (27,829 | ) | ||||||
Less non-allowable deferred tax asset |
(7,883 | ) | (7,883 | ) | (7,883 | ) | ||||||
Plus permitted valuation allowances (2) |
| | 12,810 | |||||||||
Plus accumulated other comprehensive income |
13,097 | 13,097 | 13,097 | |||||||||
Total regulatory capital |
119,457 | 119,457 | 132,267 | |||||||||
Minimum required capital |
71,040 | 45,501 | 91,002 | |||||||||
Excess regulatory capital |
$ | 48,417 | $ | 73,956 | $ | 41,265 | ||||||
Adjusted total assets (1) |
$ | 1,776,005 | $ | 1,137,519 | $ | 1,137,519 | ||||||
Regulatory capital as a percentage |
6.73 | % | 10.50 | % | 11.63 | % | ||||||
Minimum capital required as a percentage |
4.00 | % | 4.00 | % | 8.00 | % | ||||||
Excess regulatory capital as a percentage |
2.73 | % | 6.50 | % | 3.63 | % | ||||||
Well capitalized requirement |
5.00 | % | 6.00 | % | 10.00 | % | ||||||
(1) | Represents amounts for the consolidated Bank as reported to the Pennsylvania Department of Banking and FDIC on Form 041 for the quarter ended March 31, 2011. | |
(2) | Limited to 1.25% of risk adjusted total assets. |
Results of Operations Comparison of Three Months Ended March 31, 2011 and 2010:
For the three months ended March 31, 2011, net income was $1.9 million, representing a 37.3%
increase compared to net income of $1.4 million for the quarter ended March 31, 2010. Income
available to common shareholders, after the payment of dividends on preferred stock, was $1.6
million or $0.28 per diluted common share for the quarter ended March 31, 2011 compared to income
available to common shareholders of $1.0 million or $0.18 per diluted common share for the quarter
ended March 31, 2010. The $529,000 increase in income available to common shareholders for the
March 31, 2011 quarter reflects a $789,000 decrease in non-cash debt security impairment charges
and a $473,000 decrease in the provision for loan losses. These factors were partially offset by a
$315,000 decrease in net interest income and a $373,000 increase in income tax expense, reflecting
a higher level of pre-tax income.
37
Table of Contents
Interest Income:
Parkvale had interest income of $16.0 million during the three months ended March 31, 2011 versus
$18.6 million during the comparable period in 2010. The $2.7 million or 14.2% decrease is the
result of a 35 basis point decrease in the average yield from 4.20% in the March 2010 quarter to
3.85% in the current quarter and a $112.0 million or 6.3% decrease in the average balance of
interest-earning assets. Interest income from loans decreased $1.4 million or 9.7%, resulting from
a decrease in the average outstanding loan balances of $34.0 million or 3.3% and a 35 basis point
decrease in the average yield from 5.26% in 2010 to 4.91% in 2011. The decrease in the loan
portfolio was primarily due to a decline in single-family residential mortgage loans. The average
loan yield decreased due to lower prevailing rates on new loans along with ARM loans repricing down
due to lower indices for periodic rate adjustments. Investment interest income decreased by $1.3
million or 27.1% due to a decrease of $59.4 million or 10.2% in the average balance and a 62 basis
point decrease in the average yield from 3.28% in 2010 to 2.66% in 2011. Interest income earned on
federal funds sold decreased by $11,000 or 12.5% from the 2010 quarter due to a decrease of $18.6
million or 13.0% in the average balance. The current Federal Reserve target rate is 0.25%. The
weighted average yield on all interest-earning assets was 3.81% at March 31, 2011 and 4.11% at
March 31, 2010.
Interest Expense:
Interest expense decreased $2.3 million or 25.3% from the 2010 to the 2011 quarter. The decrease
was due to a 42 basis point decrease in the average rate paid on deposits and borrowings from 2.07%
in 2010 to 1.65% in 2011 and a decrease in the average deposits and borrowings of $74.3 million or
4.3%. At March 31, 2011, the average rate payable on liabilities was 1.22% for deposits, 4.65% for
borrowings, 5.14% for term debt and 1.61% for combined deposits, borrowings and debt.
Net Interest Income:
Net interest income was $9.1 million for the quarter ended March 31, 2011 compared to $9.4 million
for the quarter ended March 31, 2010. The $315,000 decrease is attributable to a net decrease of
$37.7 million of net earning assets, partially offset by a 7 basis point increase in the average
interest rate spread from 2.13% in 2010 to 2.20% in 2011.
Provision for Loan Losses:
The provision for loan losses is an amount added to the allowance against which loan losses are
charged. The provision for loan losses for the quarter ended March 31, 2011 decreased by $473,000
or 40.6% from the 2010 quarter based upon an analysis of credit factors related to the Banks
portfolio and related reserve levels as of March 31, 2011. Aggregate valuation allowances were
1.87%, 1.83% and 1.68% of gross loans at March 31, 2011, June 30, 2010 and March 31, 2010,
respectively.
Nonperforming loans, impaired loans and real estate owned (net of reserves) aggregated $31.8
million, $35.2 million and $33.9 million at March 31, 2011, June 30, 2010 and March 31, 2010,
representing 1.76%, 1.91% and 1.79% of total assets at the respective balance sheet dates. Total
loan loss reserves at March 31, 2011 were $19.0 million, compared to $19.2 million at June 30, 2010
and $17.7 million at March 31, 2010. Management considers loan loss reserves sufficient when
compared to the value of the underlying collateral. See Nonperforming Loans and Foreclosed Real
Estate and Allowance for Loan Losses concerning trends experienced. Collateral is considered and
evaluated when establishing the provision for loan losses and the sufficiency of the allowance for
loan losses. Management believes the allowance for loan losses is adequate to cover the amount of
probable loan losses.
38
Table of Contents
Noninterest Income:
Total noninterest income for the March 31, 2011 quarter increased by $712,000 or 47.2%, primarily
due to lower levels of non-cash debt security impairment charges recognized in earnings, which
decreased to $255,000 during the March 31, 2011 quarter compared to $1.0 million during the prior
year period. The March 31, 2011 quarter writedowns were due to the other than temporary impairment
of two pooled trust preferred securities resulting primarily from the deterioration of and payment
deferral by underlying issuers during the current quarter. The impairment charge recognized during
the March 31, 2010 quarter related to two pooled trust preferred and three non agency CMO
securities. The net gain on sale of assets decreased by $167,000 compared to the March 2010
quarter, as there were no sales in the March 2011 quarter. Noninterest income included an increase
of $141,000 or 9.5% of service charges on deposit accounts, and decreases of $37,000 or 9.8% of
service charges and other fees, and $14,000 or 2.7% of other income. Annuity fee and commission
income included in other income was $224,000 in the 2011 quarter compared to $238,000 in the 2010
quarter.
Noninterest Expense:
Total noninterest expense decreased by $32,000 or 0.4% for the three months ended March 31, 2011
compared to the March 31, 2010 quarter, due to decreases of $155,000 or 4.1% of compensation and
employee benefits expense, and $85,000 or 6.8% in office occupancy offset by an increase of
$149,000 or 16.2% in FDIC insurance related to a higher premium rate charged by the FDIC and a
$61,000 or 3.9% increase in other expenses. Annualized noninterest expense as a percentage of
average assets was 1.74% for the quarter ended March 31, 2011 and 1.65% for the quarter ended March
31, 2010, reflecting lower levels of average assets during the March 2011 quarter.
Income Tax Expense:
Income tax expense for the three months ended March 31, 2011 was $845,000 compared to $472,000 for
the March 2010 quarter, primarily due to a higher level of pre-tax income. The overall effective
tax rates were 30.3% and 25.0% for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively.
The effective rates in both March 2011 and 2010 are lower than the federal statutory rate of 35.0%
due to tax benefits resulting from tax-exempt instruments.
Results of Operations Comparison of Nine Months Ended March 31, 2011 and 2010:
For the nine month period ended March 31, 2011, net income was $6.0 million compared to net income
of $4.7 million for the nine month period ended March 31, 2010. After giving effect to the
dividends on the preferred stock, the income available to common shareholders was $4.8 million or
$0.87 per diluted common share for the nine months ended March 31, 2011 compared to income
available to common shareholders of $3.5 million or $0.64 per diluted common share for the nine
months ended March 31, 2010. The $1.3 million increase in income available to common shareholders
for the nine months ended March 31, 2011 reflects a $2.4 million decrease in non-cash debt security
impairment charges, a $2.1 million decrease in the provision for loan losses and a $521,000
increase in other non-interest income. These factors were partially offset by a $1.3 million
increase in income tax expense, a $1.0 million decrease in gain on sale of assets, a $734,000
increase in FDIC insurance premiums and a $652,000 decrease in net interest income. The increase in
income tax expense reflects a higher level of pre-tax income for the nine months ended March 31,
2011.
Interest Income:
Parkvale had interest income of $49.2 million during the nine months ended March 31, 2011 versus
$58.0 million during the comparable period in 2010. The decrease of $8.8 million or 15.1% is
attributable to a 41 basis point decrease in the average yield from 4.32% in 2010 to 3.91% in 2010
and a decrease in the
39
Table of Contents
average interest-earning asset portfolio of $109.0 million or 6.1%. Interest income from loans
decreased by $4.5 million or 10.5% due to a decrease in the average loan balance of $48.3 million
or 4.5% and a 33 basis point decrease in the average yield from 5.34% in 2010 to 5.01% in 2011. The
average loan yield decreased due to lower prevailing rates on new loans along with ARM loans
repricing down due to lower indices for periodic rate adjustments. Income from investments
decreased by $4.3 million or 28.6% from 2010 due to a 72 basis point decrease in the average yield
from 3.50% in 2010 to 2.78% in 2011 and a decrease of $57.3 million or 10.1% in the average
investment balance. Interest income earned on federal funds sold decreased by $7,000 or 2.4% from
the nine months ended March 31, 2010 due to a decrease in the average Federal Fund balance of $3.4
million or 2.2%.
Interest Expense:
Interest expense decreased by $8.1 million or 26.9% during the nine months ended March 31, 2011
versus 2010. The decrease was due to a 56 basis point decrease in the average rate paid from 2.30%
in 2010 to 1.74% in 2011 as a result of lower prevailing market rates for retail deposits and a
decrease in the average deposits and borrowings of $55.5 million or 3.2%.
Net Interest Income:
Net interest income decreased to $27.2 million for the nine months ended March 31, 2011 compared to
$27.8 million for the nine months ended March 31, 2010. The $652,000 or 2.3% decrease is
attributable to a net decrease of $53.5 million or 123.9% in net earning assets, offset by a 15
basis point increase in the average interest rate spread from 2.02% in 2010 to 2.17% in 2011.
Provision for Loan Losses:
Provision for loan losses decreased by $2.1 million or 43.5% from the nine-month period ended March
31, 2010 to the nine months ended March 31, 2011. Aggregate valuation allowances were 1.87% of
gross loans at March 31, 2011, 1.83% of gross loans at June 30, 2010 and 1.68% of gross loans at
March 31, 2010. Total loan loss reserves at March 31, 2011 were $19.0 million.
Noninterest Income:
Noninterest income increased by $1.9 million or 36.5% for the nine months ended March 31, 2011 from
the nine months ended March 31, 2010 due primarily to a lower level of writedowns of investment
securities. The net impairment loss recognized in earnings for the nine months ended March 31, 2011
was $2.2 million compared to $4.6 million for the nine months ended March 31, 2010. The prior
period writedowns include $3.6 million of pooled trust preferred securities and $962,000 of
collateralized mortgage obligations. Net gain on sale of assets decreased by $1.0 million due to
prior period gains of $2.3 million of recovery on sale of previously written down securities and a
$108,000 gain on sale of tail-end mortgage-backed securities. Service charges on deposits increased
by $298,000 or 6.3%. Other fees and service charges for all types of products decreased by $1,000
or 0.1%. Other income increased by $224,000 or 14.2%. Annuity fee and commission income included in
other income was $776,000 for the nine months ended March 31, 2011 compared to $645,000 for the
nine months ended March 31, 2010.
Noninterest Expense:
Noninterest expenses increased by $764,000 or 3.4% for the nine-month period ended March 31, 2011
from the comparable period in 2010. The increase in noninterest expense is primarily attributable
to an increase in FDIC insurance expense of $734,000 or 37.0% due to a higher premium rate charged
by the FDIC. Other expense increased by $301,000 or 6.8% primarily due to increased costs
associated with maintaining foreclosed real estate. These increases were offset by a decrease of
$187,000 or 1.7% in compensation and employee benefits due to a reduction in the amount of
incentive compensation being accrued.
40
Table of Contents
Parkvale is not able to pay or accrue any cash bonuses to its five most highly compensated
employees until the Series A Preferred Stock is redeemed, and other benefits are also being
reduced. Office occupancy expense decreased by $177,000 or 5.1% compared to the prior period.
Marketing expense increased by $18,000 or 7.6%. Annualized noninterest expenses as a percentage of
average assets were 1.72% for the nine months ended March 31, 2011 compared to 1.59% for the nine
months ended March 31, 2010.
Income Tax Expense:
Income tax expense for the nine months ended March 31, 2011 was $2.0 million compared to $716,000
for the previous nine months ended March 31, 2010. The $1.3 million increase is primarily due to
higher pre-tax income in the current nine months, compounded by a higher level of tax valuation
allowance reversals in fiscal 2010. The lower level of pre-tax income in the nine months ended
March 31, 2010 was due to higher security writedowns and loan loss provisions. The effective tax
rates are 25.0% and 13.2% for the nine months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively. The
effective tax rate in the nine months of fiscal 2011 is lower than the statutory rate of 35% due to
a tax refund, a reversal of tax valuation allowance from the sale of equity securities, and the tax
benefits resulting from tax-exempt instruments. The effective tax rate in the nine months of fiscal
2010 is lower than the statutory rate of 35% primarily due to reversal of a $734,000 tax valuation
allowance from the sale of preferred stock investments, combined with the tax benefits from
tax-exempt instruments.
Impact of Inflation and Changing Prices:
The financial statements and related data presented herein have been prepared in accordance with
U.S. GAAP, which requires the measurement of financial position and operating results in terms of
historical dollars without considering changes in the relative purchasing power of money over time
due to inflation. Unlike most industrial companies, substantially all of the assets and
liabilities of a financial institution are monetary in nature. As a result, interest rates have a
more significant impact on a financial institutions performance than the effects of general levels
of inflation. Interest rates do not necessarily move in the same direction or in the same magnitude
as the prices of goods and services as measured by the consumer price index.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
Quantitative and qualitative disclosures about market risk are presented at June 30, 2010 in Item 7A of Parkvale Financial Corporations Form 10-K, filed with the SEC on September 13, 2010, as amended on November 12, 2010. |
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
Disclosure controls and procedures are monitored and supervised by Parkvales management, including the CEO and Chief Financial Officer, regarding the effectiveness of the design and operation of Parkvales disclosure controls and procedures. Parkvales management, including the CEO and Chief Financial Officer, concluded that Parkvales disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of March 31, 2011. There have been no changes in Parkvales internal controls or in other factors that materially affected, or that are reasonably likely to materially affect, Parkvales internal controls. |
41
Table of Contents
PART II OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
None |
Item 1A. Risk Factors
Risk factor disclosures are presented at June 30, 2010 in Item 1A of the Corporations Form 10-K, filed with the SEC on September 13, 2010, as amended on November 12, 2010. Management believes that there have been no material changes in Parkvales risk factors since June 30, 2010. |
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
(a) | During the quarter, Parkvale Financial Corporation sold from Treasury shares 6,683 shares at a market price of $9.18 to the Executive Deferred Compensation Plan and 484 shares at a market price of $10.98 to the Supplemental Executive Benefit Plan. | |
(b) | Not applicable | |
(c) | Not applicable |
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities
None |
Item 4. Reserved
N/A |
Item 5. Other Information
None |
Item 6. Exhibits. The following exhibits are filed herewith:
31.1 | Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. | ||
31.2 | Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. | ||
32.1 | Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
42
Table of Contents
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
Parkvale Financial Corporation |
||||
DATE: May 20, 2011 | By: | /s/ Gilbert A. Riazzi | ||
Gilbert A. Riazzi | ||||
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
||||
DATE: May 20, 2011 | By: | /s/ Robert J. McCarthy, Jr. | ||
Robert J. McCarthy, Jr. | ||||
President and Chief Executive Officer | ||||
43