Attached files
U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
x | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2011
o | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from
Commission File No. 333-140236
ZENTRIC, INC.
(Exact name of small business issuer as specified in its charter)
Nevada |
|
(State or other jurisdiction of Incorporation or organization) | (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
Unit C2, 802 Southdown Road,
Mississauga, Ontario, Canada, L5J 2Y4
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)
(416) 245-8000
(Issuer’s telephone number)
(Former name, address and fiscal year, if changed since last report)
Check whether the issuer (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Exchange Act during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the issuer was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes x No o
Check whether the registrant has filed all documents and reports required to be filed by Sections 12, 13, or 15 (d) of the Exchange Act subsequent to the distribution of securities under a plan confirmed by a court. Yes o No x
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company filer. See definition of “accelerated filer” and “large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act (Check one):
Large Accelerated Filer o Accelerated Filer o Non-Accelerated Filer o Smaller Reporting Company x
State the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common equity, as of May 16, 2011: 60,973,219 shares of common stock.
Transitional Small Business Disclosure Format Yes o No x
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act).
o Yes x No
1
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. | Financial Statements | 3 |
Item 2. | Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations | 9 |
Item 3 | Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk | 10 |
Item 4T. | Control and Procedures | 10 |
PART II-- OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1 | Legal Proceedings | 12 |
Item 2. | Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds | 12 |
Item 3. | Defaults Upon Senior Securities | 12 |
Item 4. | Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders | 12 |
Item 5. | Other Information | 12 |
Item 6. | Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K | 12 |
2
ZENTRIC, INC.
(A Development Stage Company)
BALANCE SHEETS
|
| March 31, 2011 (Unaudited) |
|
| December 31, 2010 (Audited) | ||
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Current Assets |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Cash |
| $ | 724 |
|
| $ | 3,367 |
Prepaid Expense |
|
| - |
|
|
| 100 |
Total Assets |
| $ | 724 |
|
| $ | 3,467 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities |
| $ | 21,321 |
|
| $ | 37,687 |
Interest Payable |
|
| 19,118 |
|
|
| 14,981 |
Advances from shareholder |
|
| 90,608 |
|
|
| 55,018 |
Note payable, net of discount |
|
| 90,018 |
|
|
| 90,042 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Liabilities |
|
| 221,065 |
|
|
| 197,738 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders' Deficit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock: $0.001 par value, 100,000,000 common shares authorized, 60,973,219 and 60,973,219 common shares outstanding as of March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively |
|
| 60,973 |
|
|
| 60,973 |
Additional paid-in capital |
|
| 697,143 |
|
|
| 696,002 |
Deficit accumulated during the development stage |
|
| (978,457 | ) |
|
| (951,246) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Stockholders' Deficit |
|
| (220,341) |
|
|
| (194,271) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Liabilities and Stockholders' Deficit |
| $ | 724 |
|
| $ | 3,467 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part to these financial statements.
3
ZENTRIC, INC.
(A Development Stage Company)
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Unaudited)
|
| Three Months Ended | Three Months Ended | For The Period From July 21, 2008 (Inception) to | |
|
|
|
| ||
REVENUE |
| $ - | $ - | $ - | |
EXPENSES |
|
|
| ||
Office an General | 7,002 | 6,284 | 59,653 | ||
Professional fees |
| 4,059 | 1,700 | 56,275 | |
Interest Expense |
| 5,254 | 4,266 | 35,786 | |
Consulting and subcontracting |
| 10,869 | 25,000 | 752,965 | |
Bank charges |
| 27 | - | 457 | |
Loss on settlement | - | - | 73,321 | ||
| 27,211 | 37,250 | 978,457 | ||
NET LOSS |
| ($27,211) | ($37,250) | ($978,457) | |
LOSS PER WEIGHTED NUMBER OF SHARES OUTSTANDING - BASIC AND DILUTED | ($0.00) | ($0.00) |
| ||
WEIGHTED AVERAGE NUMBER OF SHARES OUTSTANDING - BASIC AND DILUTED | 60,973,219 | 49,132,494 |
| ||
The accompanying notes are an integral part to these financial statements.
4
ZENTRIC, INC.
(A Development Stage Company)
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
| Three Months Ended | Three Months Ended | For the Period From July 21, 2008 (Inception) to March 31, 2011 |
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES |
|
|
|
Net loss | $ (27,211) | $ (37,250) | $ (978,457) |
Adjustment to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities: |
|
|
|
Common stock issued for services | - | - | 586,865 |
Imputed interest on advance from shareholder | 1,141 | 3,334 | 6,737 |
Amortization on note discount | - | 400 | 2,125 |
Loss on settlement of debt | - | - | 73,321 |
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: |
|
|
|
Prepaid Expenses | 100 | 4,767 | - |
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities | (12,263) | 75 | 47,738 |
NET CASH USED IN OPERATING ACTIVITIES | (38,233) | (28,674) | (261,677) |
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES |
|
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of common stock | - |
| 6,795 |
Advances from related party | 35,590 | 3,774 | 125,588 |
Borrowings on debt - related party | - | 25,000 | 130,018 |
CASH FLOWS (USED IN) PROVIDED BY FINANCING ACTIVITIES | 35,590 | 28,774 | 262,401 |
NET (DECREASE) INCREASE IN CASH | (2,643) | 100 | 724 |
CASH, BEGINNING OF PERIOD | 3,367 | - | - |
CASH, END OF PERIOD | $ 724 | $ 100 | $ 724 |
|
|
|
|
SUPLLEMENTAL CASH FLOW INFORMATION |
|
|
|
Interest paid | - | - | - |
Income taxes paid | - | - | - |
Non-cash investment and financing activities Forgiveness of related party debt | - | - | 35,000 |
Shares issued as incentive for debt | - | - | 2,100 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part to these financial statements.
5
ZENTRIC, INC.
(A Development Stage Company)
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
March 31, 2011 (unaudited)
1. | ORGANIZATION AND NATURE OF BUSINESS |
Zentric, Inc. (the "Company"), was incorporated on July 21, 2008, under the laws of the State of Nevada as Constant Environment, Inc. and changed it’s name to Zentric, Inc. on December 16, 2009. The company is an advanced battery technology company based on a new and revolutionary technology that incorporates high voltages dual electrolytes to produce higher voltages and power. The business of “Constant Environment” remains as a division of Zenrtic. The division is a separate business that provides microclimate systems to specialty markets, who have a need to protect and preserve rare and/or valuable items
2. | GOING CONCERN |
The accompanying financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America with the assumption that the Company will be able to realize its assets and discharge its liabilities in the normal course of business. The Company has had limited revenues and has an accumulated deficit which raises substantial doubt about the Company's ability to continue as a going concern. The financial statements do not include any adjustments to the amounts and classifications of assets and liabilities that might be necessary should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern.
The Company's ability to continue as a going concern is contingent upon its ability to complete public equity financing and generate profitable operations in the future. Management's plan in this regard is to secure additional funds through equity financing and through loans made by the Company's stockholders.
3. SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Basis of Presentation
These financial statements and related notes are presented in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States, and are expressed in U.S. dollars. The Company’s fiscal year end is December 31.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. The Company regularly evaluates estimates and assumptions related to the deferred income tax asset valuation allowances. The Company bases its estimates and assumptions on current facts, historical experience and various other factors that it believes to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities and the accrual of costs and expenses that are not readily apparent from other sources. The actual results experienced by the Company may differ materially and adversely from the Company’s estimates. To the extent there are material differences between the estimates and the actual results, future results of operations will be affected.
Interim Financial Statements
These interim financial statements have been prepared on the same basis as the annual financial statements and in the opinion of management, reflect all adjustments, which include only normal recurring adjustments, necessary to present fairly the Company’s financial position, results of operations and cash flows for the periods shown. The results of operations for such periods are not necessarily indicative of the results expected for a full year or for any future period.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
The Company considers all highly liquid instruments with maturity of three months or less at the time of issuance to be cash equivalents. As at December 31, 2010 and March 31, 2011, there were no cash equivalents.
Financial Instruments
Pursuant to ASC 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures and ASC 825, Financial Instruments, an entity is required to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. ASC 820 and 825 establishes a fair value hierarchy based on the level of independent, objective evidence surrounding the inputs used to measure fair value. A financial instrument’s categorization within the fair value hierarchy is based upon the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. ASC 820 and 825 prioritizes the inputs into three levels that may be used to measure fair value:
6
Level 1
Level 1 applies to assets or liabilities for which there are quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.
Level 2
Level 2 applies to assets or liabilities for which there are inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets; quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in markets with insufficient volume or infrequent transactions (less active markets); or model derived valuations in which significant inputs are observable or can be derived principally from, or corroborated by, observable market data.
Level 3
Level 3 applies to assets or liabilities for which there are unobservable inputs to the valuation methodology that are significant to the measurement of the fair value of the assets or liabilities.
We believe that the recorded values of all of our other financial instruments approximate their current fair values because of their nature and respective maturity dates or durations.
Loss per Share
The Company computes net loss per share in accordance with ASC 260, Earnings per Share. ASC 260 requires presentation of both basic and diluted earnings per share (“EPS”) on the face of the income statement. Basic EPS is computed by dividing net loss available to common shareholders (numerator) by the weighted average number of shares outstanding (denominator) during the period. Diluted EPS gives effect to all dilutive potential common shares outstanding during the period using the treasury stock method and convertible preferred stock using the if-converted method. In computing diluted EPS, the average stock price for the period is used in determining the number of shares assumed to be purchased from the exercise of stock options or warrants. Diluted EPS excludes all dilutive potential shares if their effect is anti dilutive.
Comprehensive Income
ASC 220, Comprehensive Income, establishes standards for the reporting and display of comprehensive loss and its components in the financial statements. As at September 30 and March 31, 2011, the Company has no items that represent a comprehensive loss and, therefore, has not included a schedule of comprehensive loss in the financial statements.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In March 2010, the FASB (Financial Accounting Standards Board) issued Accounting Standards Update 2010-11 (ASU
2010-11), “Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815): Scope Exception Related to Embedded Credit Derivatives.” The amendments in this Update are effective for each reporting entity at the beginning of its first fiscal quarter beginning after
June 15, 2010. Early adoption is permitted at the beginning of each entity’s first fiscal quarter beginning after issuance of this Update. The Company does not expect the provisions of ASU 2010- 11 to have a material effect on the financial position, results of operations or cash flows of the Company.
In February 2010, the FASB Accounting Standards Update 2010-10 (ASU 2010-10), “Consolidation (Topic 810): Amendments for Certain Investment Funds.” The amendments in this Update are effective as of the beginning of a reporting entity’s first annual period that begins after November 15, 2009 and for interim periods within that first reporting period. Early application is not permitted. The Company’s adoption of provisions of ASU 2010-10 did not have a material effect on the financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
In February 2010, the FASB issued ASU No. 2010-09 “Subsequent Events (ASC Topic 855) “Amendments to Certain Recognition and Disclosure Requirements” (“ASU No. 2010-09”). ASU No. 2010-09 requires an entity that is an SEC filer to evaluate subsequent events through the date that the financial statements are issued and removes the requirement for an SEC filer to disclose a date, in both issued and revised financial statements, through which the filer had evaluated subsequent events. The adoption did not have an impact on the Company’s financial position and results of operations.
In January 2010, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2010-06, “Improving Disclosures about Fair Value Measurements.” ASU No. 2010-06 amends FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 820 and clarifies and provides additional disclosure requirements related to recurring and non-recurring fair value measurements and employers’ disclosures about postretirement benefit plan assets. This ASU is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2009. The adoption of ASU 2010-06 did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial statements.
7
In January 2010, the FASB issued an amendment to ASC 505, Equity, where entities that declare dividends to shareholders that may be paid in cash or shares at the election of the shareholders are considered to be a share issuance that is reflected prospectively in EPS, and is not accounted for as a stock dividend. This standard is effective for interim and annual periods ending on or after December 15, 2009 and is to be applied on a retrospective basis. The adoption of this standard is not expected to have a significant impact on the Company’s financial statements.
In January 2010, the FASB issued an amendment to ASC 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosure, to require reporting entities to separately disclose the amounts and business rationale for significant transfers in and out of Level 1 and Level 2 fair value measurements and separately present information regarding purchase, sale, issuance, and settlement of Level 3 fair value measures on a gross basis. This standard, for which the Company is currently assessing the impact, is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2009 with the exception of disclosures regarding the purchase, sale, issuance, and settlement of Level 3 fair value measures which are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2010. The adoption of this standard is not expected to have a significant impact on the Company’s financial statements.
In October 2009, the FASB issued an amendment to the accounting standards related to certain revenue arrangements that include software elements. This standard clarifies the existing accounting guidance such that tangible products that contain both software and non-software components that function together to deliver the product’s essential functionality, shall be excluded from the scope of the software revenue recognition accounting standards. Accordingly, sales of these products may fall within the scope of other revenue recognition standards or may now be within the scope of this standard and may require an allocation of the arrangement consideration for each element of the arrangement. This standard, for which the Company is currently assessing the impact, will become effective on January 1, 2011.
In October 2009, FASB issued an amendment to the accounting standards related to the accounting for revenue in arrangements with multiple deliverables including how the arrangement consideration is allocated among delivered and undelivered items of the arrangement. Among the amendments, this standard eliminated the use of the residual method for allocating arrangement considerations and requires an entity to allocate the overall consideration to each deliverable based on an estimated selling price of each individual deliverable in the arrangement in the absence of having vendor-specific objective evidence or other third party evidence of fair value of the undelivered items. This standard also provides further guidance on how to determine a separate unit of accounting in a multiple-deliverable revenue arrangement and expands the disclosure requirements about the judgments made in applying the estimated selling price method and how those judgments affect the timing or amount of revenue recognition. This standard, for which the Company is currently assessing the impact, will become effective on January 1, 2011.
The Company has implemented all new accounting pronouncements that are in effect. These pronouncements did not have any material impact on the financial statements unless otherwise disclosed, and the Company does not believe that there are any other new accounting pronouncements that have been issued that might have a material impact on its financial position or results of operations.
8
ZENTRIC, INC.
(A Development Stage Company)
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
March 31, 2011 (unaudited)
4. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
Related party transactions are in the normal course of operations and are recorded at amounts established and agreed between the related parties. Related party transactions not disclosed elsewhere in these financial statements are as follows:
The Company have received cash advanced of $35,590 and $125,588 for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and from inception to March 31, 2011, respectively from a director and shareholder.
Interest has been imputed at 7% resulting in interest expense of $1,141 and $6,737 for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and from July 21, 2008 (Inception) to March 31, 2011 respectively.
5. STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
On July 15, 2009, the Company's board of directors declared a four-for-one forward stock split on the shares of the Company's common stock. Each shareholder of record on August 6, 2009 received four additional shares of common stock for each share of common stock then held. The Company retained the current par value of $0.001 per share for all shares of common stock. All references in the financial statements to the number of shares outstanding, per share amounts, common stock, additional paid-in capital and stock option data of the Company's common stock have been restated retroactively to reflect the effect of the stock split for all periods presented.
On July 27, 2009 we entered into a Loan Agreement with Lucilla Ho wherein she agreed to loan us $20,000 and she received 20,000 shares of our common stock.
On August 7, 2009 we entered into a Loan Agreement with 1456146 Ontario Limited wherein the entity agreed to loan us $50,000 and she received 100,000 shares of our common stock.
On August 15, 2009 the Company entered into a Loan Agreement with Ricky Wu wherein he agreed to loan the Company $20,000 and he will receive 40,000 shares of the Company's common stock.
On March 25, 2010 the Company entered into a Loan Agreement with Lucilla Ho wherein she agreed to loan the Company $25,000 and she will receive 50,000 shares of the Company's common stock as a loan incentive value at $0.01 per share which was the last price that shares was purchased for with cash. The shares issued resulted in a discount which is being amortized straight-line over the term of the note.
On September 30, 2010 the Company received Conversion Notice from note holder to settle outstanding debt of $20,000 principal and $3,799 accrued interest by issuing 1,189,950 shares of common stock at a price of $0.02 per share. The total fair value of the shares was $60,687 based on the closing price per share, resulting in a loss of extinguishment of debt of $36,888. The shares remain unissued as quarter ended.
On September 30, 2010 the Company received Conversion Notice from note holder to settle outstanding debt of $20,000 principal and $3,505 accrued interest by issuing 1,175,250 shares of common stock at a price of $0.02 per share. The total fair value of the shares was $59,938 based on the closing price per share, resulting in a loss of extinguishment of debt of $36,433.
On October 1, 2010, holders of the Company’s notes elected to convert loans into 2,365,219 shares of our common stock for $47,130 of principal and interest. Shares were valued based on fair market value of conversion and as a result the company recorded a loss of $73,321on conversion of debt.
On October 1, 2010, the Company issued 9,200,000 shares of our common stock for $460,000 consulting services. Shares were valued based on fair market value on the date of authorization.
On December 1 2010, the Company’s board of directors declared to issue 230,000 shares of our common stock for $23,000 consulting services. Shares were valued based on fair market value on the date of authorization.
Holders of common stock are entitled to one vote for each share held. There are no restrictions that limit the Company's ability to pay dividends on its common stock. The Company has not declared any dividends since incorporation.
9
ZENTRIC, INC.
(A Development Stage Company)
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
March 31, 2011 (unaudited)
6. NOTE PAYABLE
On July 27, 2009 we entered into a Loan Agreement with a shareholder wherein they agreed to loan us $20,000 bearing 15% interest rate and due in one year. As an incentive to providing the loan to the company, 20,000 shares of common stock was issued at a value of $.01 per share, which was the last price per share that shares was purchased with cash, resulting in a discount of $200 which is being amortized using straight-line during the term of the loan. On September 30, 2010 the Company received Conversion Notice from note holder to settle outstanding debt of $20,000 principal and $3,799 accrued interest by issuing 1,189,950 shares of common stock at a price of $0.02 per share. The total fair value of the shares was $60,687 based on the closing price per share, resulting in a loss of extinguishment of debt of $36,888.
On August 7, 2009 we entered into a Loan Agreement with a shareholder wherein they agreed to loan us $50,000 bearing 15% interest rate and due in two year. As an incentive to providing the loan to the company, 100,000 shares of common stock was issued at a value of $.01 per share, which was the last price that shares was purchased with cash, resulting in a discount of $1,000 which is being amortized using straight-line during the term of the loan.
On August 15, 2009 we entered into a Loan Agreement with a shareholder wherein they agreed to loan us $20,000 bearing 15% interest rate and due in one year. As an incentive to providing the loan to the company, 40,000 shares of common stock was issued at a value of $.01 per share, which was the last price per share that shares was purchased with cash, resulting in a discount of $400 which is being amortized using straight-line during the term of the loan. On September 30, 2010 the Company received Conversion Notice from note holder to settle outstanding debt of $20,000 principal and $3,505 accrued interest by issuing 1,175,250 shares of common stock at a price of $0.02 per share. The total fair value of the shares was $59,938 based on the closing price per share, resulting in a loss of extinguishment of debt of $36,433.
On March 25, 2010 we entered into a Loan Agreement with a shareholder wherein they agreed to loan us $25,000 bearing 15% interest rate due in one year. As an incentive in providing the loan to the company, 50,000 shares of common stock was issued at a value of $0.01 per share, which was the last price that shares was purchased with cash, resulting in a discount of $500 which is being amortized using straight-line during the term of the loan.
On April 20, 2010 we entered into a standard Loan Agreement with a company wherein they agreed to loan us $8,000 bearing 15% interest rate due in one year. The note is currently not convertible to common stock or any other instrument.
On July 27, 2010 we entered into a standard Loan Agreement with a company wherein they agreed to loan us $2,018 bearing 15% interest rate due in one year. The note is currently not convertible to common stock or any other instrument.
On October 1, 2010, $47,130 of principal and accrued interest was converted into 2,365,219 shares of our common stock Shares were valued based on fair market value of conversion and as a result the company recorded a loss of $73,321on conversion of debt.
On November 3, 2010 we entered into a Loan Agreement for $5,000 bearing 15% interest rate.
Interest accrual for all loans outstanding as of December 31, 2010 and March 31, 2011 are $19,118 and $14, 981, respectively.
10
Item 2: Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with our Financial Statements and notes appearing elsewhere in this report. The following discussion contains forward-looking statements that reflect our plans, estimates and beliefs. Our actual results could differ materially from those discussed in the forward looking statements. Factors that could cause or contribute to such differences include, but are not limited to those discussed below and elsewhere in this report. Our financial statements are stated in United States Dollars and are prepared in accordance with United States Generally Accepted Accounting Principles.
Zentric, Inc. (the "Company"), was incorporated on July 21, 2008, under the laws of the State of Nevada as Constant Environment, Inc. and changed it’s name to Zentric, Inc. on December 16, 2009. The company is an advanced battery technology company based on a new and revolutionary technology that incorporates high voltages dual electrolytes to produce higher voltages and power.
Business Division
The business of “Constant Environment” remains as a division of Zenrtic. The division is a separate business that provides microclimate systems to specialty markets, who have a need to protect and preserve rare and/or valuable items.
Employees
Presently our two officers are contributing their services without payment and certain consultants have accepted shares for services.
In the future, we plan to hire five full time employees and two part-time employees. From time to time, we may employ additional independent contractors to support our development, marketing, sales, support and administrative organization. We also intend to hire 2 sales/marketing staff, 1 administrative assistant, and 2 microclimate technicians. Competition for qualified personnel in the industry in which we compete is intense. We believe that our future success will depend in part on our continued ability to attract, hire or acquire and retain qualified employees.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2011 AND MARCH 31, 2010.
The Company did not generate any revenues for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and March 31, 2010.
Professional fees include legal and accounting fees and filing fees. Professional fees for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and March 31, 2010 was $4,059 and $1,700 respectively.
Consulting and subcontracting fees for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and March 31, 2010 was $10,869 and $25,000 respectively.
Office and general expense for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and March 31, 2010 was $7,002 and $6,284 respectively.
Interest expense for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and March 31, 2010 was $5,254 and $4,266 respectively.
Bank charges expense was $27 and nil for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and March 31, 2010 respectively.
Net loss for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and March 31, 2010 was $27,211 and $37,250 respectively. The loss was primarily due to the consulting fees, professional fees and interest expenses.
Loss per share was $0.00 for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and March 31, 2010.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
As of March 31, 2011, we had a working capital deficiency of $220,341, which represented a working capital decrease of $26,070 as compared to the working capital deficiency position of $194,271 as of December 31, 2010. The decrease is mainly due to the increase of our accounts payable. We did not raise any cash from issuance of common stock.
Cash flows used in operating activities for the three month period ended March 31, 2011and 2010 was ($38,232) and (28,674), respectively.
11
Cash flows used in financing activities for the three month period ended March 31, 2011 and 2010 was $35,590 and $28,774, respectively, which was due to loans.
On July 27, 2009 the Company entered into a Loan Agreement with Lucilla Ho wherein she agreed to loan the Company $20,000 and she will receive 5,000 shares of the Company’s common stock. On September 30, 2010 holder have choose to convert principal and interest into 1,189,950 shares of common stock at the price of $0.02 per share.
On August 7, 2009 the Company entered into a Loan Agreement with 1456146 Ontario Limited of which Fred Lai is the principal. The 1456146 Ontario Limited agreed to loan the Company $50,000 and 1456146 Ontario Limited will receive 100,000 shares of the Company’s common stock.
On August 15, 2009 the Company entered into a Loan Agreement with Ricky Wu wherein he agreed to loan the Company $20,000 and he will receive 40,000 shares of the Company's common stock. On September 30, 2010 holder have choose to convert principal and interest into 1,175,250 shares of common stock at the price of $0.02 per share.
On March 21, 2010 the Company entered into a Loan Agreement with Lucilla Ho wherein she agreed to loan the Company $25,000 and she will receive 50,000 shares of the Company’s common stock.
On April 20, 2010 we entered into a Loan Agreement with a company wherein they agreed to loan us $8,000 bearing 15% interest rate due in one year.
On July 27, 2010 we entered into a Loan Agreement with a company wherein they agreed to loan us $2,018 bearing 15% interest rate due in one year.
GOING CONCERN
Due to the uncertainty of our ability to meet our current operating and capital expenses, in their report on our audited financial statements for the period ended December 31,2010, our independent registered public accountants included an explanatory paragraph expressing substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern. Our financial statements contain additional note disclosures describing the circumstances that lead to this disclosure by our independent auditors.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES
Our most critical accounting policies, which are those that require significant judgment, include: income taxes and revenue recognition. In-depth descriptions of these can be found in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010. There have been no material changes in our existing accounting policies from the disclosures included in our 2010 Annual Report on Form 10-K.
OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS
We do not have any off-balance sheet guarantees, interest rate swap transactions or foreign currency contracts. We do not engage in trading activities involving non-exchange traded contracts.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risks
We conduct our business in United States dollars. Our market risk is limited to the United States domestic, economic and regulatory factors.
Item 4T. Controls and Procedures
Management's evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures
The management of the company is required to maintain disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our reports under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"), is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Commission's rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer (one individual) as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
12
In designing and evaluating disclosure controls and procedures, management recognizes that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute assurance of achieving the desired objectives. Also, the design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, have been detected. These inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty and that breakdowns can occur because of simple error or mistake. The design of any system of controls is based, in part, upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions.
As of the end of the period covered by this report, the Company conducted an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of its principal executive officer and principal financial officer, of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures. Based on their evaluation, the principal executive officer and principal financial officer concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures need improvement and were not adequately effective as of March 31, 2011 to cause the information required to be disclosed in reports that the Company files or submits under the Exchange Act to be recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods prescribed by the SEC, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to management, including the principal executive officer and principal financial officer, as appropriate, to ensure timely decisions regarding required disclosure. Management is in the process of identifying deficiencies with respect to the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures and implementing corrective measures.
Changes in Internal Controls
There was no change in our internal controls over financial reporting identified in connection with the requisite evaluation that occurred during our last fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
13
PART II – OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings.
None
Item 2. Changes in Securities.
None
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities.
None
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders.
None.
Item 5. Other Information
None
Item 6. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K
(A) Exhibits
31.1 | |
|
|
32.1 |
(B) Reports on Form 8-K
Form 8-K Filed on January 15, 2010 reporting a name change.
Form 8-K Filed on October 19, 2010 reporting a joint venture agreement.
14
SIGNATURES
In accordance with Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Exchange Act, the registrant caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, there unto duly authorized.
| ZENTRIC, INC. |
| Registrant |
|
|
Date: May 16, 2011 | By: /s/ Jeff Mak |
| Jeff Mak |
| President, Chief Executive Officer, Principal Accounting Officer and Director |
15