Attached files

file filename
EX-31.1 - CIGF6 EXHIBIT 31.1 033111 - Commonwealth Income & Growth Fund VIex31_1.htm
EX-32.2 - CIGF6 EXHIBIT 32.2 033111 - Commonwealth Income & Growth Fund VIex32_2.htm
EX-31.2 - CIGF6 EXHIBIT 31.2 033111 - Commonwealth Income & Growth Fund VIex31_2.htm
EX-32.1 - CIGF6 EXHIBIT 32.1 033111 - Commonwealth Income & Growth Fund VIex32_1.htm

 
 
 


 
 
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
 

FORM 10-Q

T QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED MARCH 31, 2011    or

¨ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 or 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Commission File Number:  333-131736

COMMONWEALTH INCOME & GROWTH FUND VI
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Pennsylvania
20-4115433
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
(I.R.S. Employer Identification Number)

Brandywine Bldg. One, Suite 200
2 Christy Drive
Chadds Ford, PA 19317
(Address, including zip code, of principal executive offices)

(484) 785-1480
(Registrant’s telephone number including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (i) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months, and (ii) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days: YES  T   NO  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).YES  ¨      NO  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definition of "accelerated filer, “large accelerated filer" and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large accelerated filer ¨
Accelerated filer ¨
Non-accelerated filer ¨
Smaller reporting company T
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company.)
 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).      YES ¨     NO T
 
 


 


 
1
 
 

 
 
 
FORM 10-Q
March 31, 2011

TABLE OF CONTENTS

  PART I
Item 1.
Financial Statements
  3
Item 2.
Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
  12
Item 3.
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
  15
Item 4.
Controls and Procedures
  15
  PART II
Item 1.
Legal Proceedings
  16
Item 1A.
Risk Factors
  16
Item 2.
Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
  16
Item 3.
Defaults Upon Senior Securities
  16
Item 5.
Other Information
  16
Item 6.
Exhibits
  16


2
 
 

 
 
 
Part I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements


Commonwealth Income & Growth Fund VI
 
Condensed Balance Sheets
 
             
             
             
   
March 31,
   
December 31,
 
   
2011
   
2010
 
   
(unaudited)
       
             
ASSETS
           
                 
Cash and cash equivalents
  $ 2,322,027     $ 2,114,823  
Lease income receivable, net of reserve of approximately $319,000 and $299,000
               
at March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively
    531,088       483,763  
Accounts receivable, Commonwealth Capital Corp.
    302,277       727,961  
Other receivables
    1,133       1,133  
Prepaid expenses
    14,133       7,703  
      3,170,658       3,335,383  
                 
Net investment in finance leases
    214,283       234,348  
                 
Technology equipment, at cost
    26,592,954       26,954,695  
Accumulated depreciation
    (12,023,287 )     (10,904,949 )
      14,569,667       16,049,746  
                 
Equipment acquisition costs and deferred expenses, net of
               
accumulated amortization of approximately $515,000 and $507,000 at March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively
    477,328       543,466  
Prepaid acquisition fees
    148,777       167,026  
      626,105       710,492  
                 
Total Assets
  $ 18,580,713     $ 20,329,969  
                 
LIABILITIES AND PARTNERS' CAPITAL
               
                 
LIABILITIES
               
Accounts payable
  $ 101,394     $ 97,520  
Accounts payable, General Partner
    41,760       30,407  
Other accrued expenses
    48,231       54,219  
Unearned lease income
    171,627       460,891  
Notes payable
    620,126       725,895  
Total Liabilities
    983,138       1,368,932  
                 
PARTNERS' CAPITAL
               
General Partner
    1,000       1,000  
Limited Partners
    17,596,575       18,960,037  
Total Partners' Capital
    17,597,575       18,961,037  
                 
Total Liabilities and Partners' Capital
  $ 18,580,713     $ 20,329,969  
                 
                 
see accompanying notes to condensed financial statements

 
3
 
 

 


Commonwealth Income & Growth Fund VI
Condensed Statements of Operations
(unaudited)
             
    Three Months Ended
             
     March 31,      March 31,  
   
2011
   
2010
 
             
Revenue
           
Lease
  $ 1,878,675     $ 1,777,155  
Interest and other
    15,695       16,759  
Gain (Loss) on sale of computer equipment
    60,282       177  
Total revenue
    1,954,652       1,794,091  
                 
Expenses
               
Operating, excluding depreciation
    459,658       402,849  
Equipment management fee, General Partner
    94,487       88,957  
Interest
    9,740       4,110  
Depreciation
    1,744,884       1,351,392  
Bad debt expense
    20,000       -  
Amortization of equipment acquisition costs and deferred expenses
    84,388       70,392  
Total expenses
    2,413,157       1,917,700  
                 
Net (loss)
  $ (458,505 )   $ (123,609 )
                 
Net (loss) allocated to Limited Partners
  $ (467,555 )   $ (132,659 )
                 
Net (loss) per equivalent limited partnership unit
  $ (0.26 )   $ (0.07 )
 
               
Weighted average number of equivalent
               
     limited partnership units outstanding
               
     during the year
    1,809,911       1,809,911  
                 
                 
  see accompanying notes to condensed financial statements  

 
4
 
 

 


Commonwealth Income & Growth Fund VI
 
Condensed Statements of Partners' Capital
 
(unaudited)
 
                               
   
General
   
Limited
                   
   
Partner
   
Partner
   
General
   
Limited
       
   
Units
   
Units
   
Partner
   
Partners
   
Total
 
Balance, January 1, 2011
    50       1,809,911       1,000       18,960,037       18,961,037  
Net income (loss)
    -       -       9,050       (467,555 )     (458,505 )
Distributions
    -       -       (9,050 )     (895,907 )     (904,957 )
Balance, March 31, 2011
    50       1,809,911     $ 1,000     $ 17,596,575     $ 17,597,575  
                                         
                                         
   
see accompanying notes to condensed financial statements
 

 
 
5
 
 

 
 

Commonwealth Income & Growth Fund VI
 
Condensed Statements of Cash Flows
 
(unaudited)
 
             
    Three Months Ended  
     
    March 31,      March 31,  
   
2011
   
2010
 
             
Net cash provided by operating activities
  $ 1,289,007     $ 972,469  
                 
Cash flows from investing activities
               
Capital expenditures
    (454,038 )     (2,307,084 )
Payment from finance leases
    27,677       4,836  
Net proceeds from the sale of computer equipment
    249,515       381  
Net cash (used in) investing activities
    (176,846 )     (2,301,867 )
                 
Cash flows from financing activities
               
Distributions to partners
    (904,957 )     (904,956 )
Net cash (used in) financing activities
    (904,957 )     (904,956 )
                 
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
    207,204       (2,234,354 )
                 
Cash and cash equivalents at at beginning of the period
    2,114,823       9,026,452  
                 
Cash and cash equivalents at end of the period
  $ 2,322,027     $ 6,792,098  
                 
                 
                 
  see accompanying notes to condensed financial statements  

 
 
6
 
 

 
 
NOTES TO CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

1. Business

Commonwealth Income & Growth Fund VI (the “Partnership”) is a limited partnership organized in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania on January 6, 2006.  The Partnership offered for sale up to 2,500,000 units of the limited partnership at the purchase price of $20 per unit (the “offering”).  The Partnership reached the minimum amount in escrow and commenced operations on May 10, 2007.  The offering terminated on March 6, 2009 with 1,810,311 units sold for a total of approximately $36,000,000 in limited partner contributions.

The Partnership uses the proceeds of the offering to acquire, own and lease various types of information technology equipment and other similar capital equipment, which will be leased primarily to U.S. corporations and institutions.  Commonwealth Capital Corp. (“CCC”), on behalf of the Partnership and other affiliated partnerships, acquires computer equipment subject to associated debt obligations and lease agreements and allocates a participation in the cost, debt and lease revenue to the various partnerships that it manages based on certain risk factors.

The Partnership’s General Partner is Commonwealth Income & Growth Fund, Inc. (the “General Partner”), a Pennsylvania corporation which is an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of CCC. CCC is a member of the Investment Program Association (IPA), Financial Planning Association (FPA), and the Equipment Leasing and Finance Association (ELFA).   Approximately ten years after the commencement of operations, the Partnership intends to sell or otherwise dispose of all of its equipment, make final distributions to partners, and to dissolve.  Unless sooner terminated or extended pursuant to the terms of its Limited Partnership Agreement, the Partnership will continue until December 31, 2018.

2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Basis of Presentation

The financial information presented as of any date other than December 31, 2010 has been prepared from the books and records without audit.  Financial information as of December 31, 2010 has been derived from the audited financial statements of the Partnership, but does not include all disclosures required by generally accepted accounting principles to be included in audited financial statements.  In the opinion of management, all adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring adjustments, necessary for a fair presentation of the financial information for the periods indicated, have been included.  For further information regarding the Partnership’s accounting policies, refer to the financial statements and related notes included in the Partnership’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010.  Operating results for the three months ended March 31, 2011 are not necessarily indicative of financial results that may be expected for the full year ended December 31, 2011.

Disclosure of Fair Value of Financial Instruments

Estimated fair value was determined by management using available market information and appropriate valuation methodologies.  However, judgment was necessary to interpret market data and develop estimated fair value. Cash, receivables, accounts payable and accrued expenses and other liabilities are carried at amounts which reasonably approximate their fair values as of March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010.

The Partnership’s long-term debt consists of notes payable, which are secured by specific computer equipment and are nonrecourse liabilities of the Partnership. The estimated fair value of this debt at March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010 approximates the carrying value of these instruments, due to the interest rates approximating current market values.

Disclosure about fair value of financial instruments is based on pertinent information available to management as of March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010. 
 
7
 
 

 
Cash and cash equivalents
 
We consider cash and cash equivalents to be cash on hand and highly liquid investments with an original maturity of 90 days or less.

At March 31, 2011, cash was held in a total of seven accounts maintained at two separate financial institutions with an aggregate balance of approximately $2,337,000. Bank accounts are federally insured up to $250,000, while pursuant to the Dodd/Frank Act of 2010, some accounts are fully insured by the FDIC.  At March 31, 2011, the total cash balance was as follows:
 
At March 31, 2011
 
Balance
 
Total bank balance
 
$
2,337,000
 
FDIC insured
   
(883,000)
 
Uninsured amount
 
$
1,454,000
 
         

The Partnership mitigates the risk of holding uninsured deposits by depositing funds with more than one institution and by only depositing funds with major financial institutions.  The Partnership deposits its funds with two institutions that are Moody's Aaa-and Aa3 Rated.   The Partnership has not experienced any losses in such accounts, and believes it is not exposed to any significant credit risk.  The amounts in such accounts will fluctuate throughout 2011 due to many factors, including the pace of additional cash receipts, equipment acquisitions and distributions to investors.
 
Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In April of 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-03 (“ASC Update 2011-03”), Reconsideration of Effective Control for Repurchase Agreements. This ASU is intended to improve financial reporting of repurchase agreements (“repos”) and other agreements that both entitle and obligate a transferor to repurchase or redeem financial assets before their maturity. The amendments in this Update are effective for the fiscal quarters and years that start on or after December 15, 2011. Early adoption is not permitted.  The Partnership is currently evaluating the effect this ASU will have on its financial statements.

In April 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-02 (“ASC Update 2011-02”) A Creditor’s Determination of Whether a Restructuring Is a Troubled Debt Restructuring.  This ASU provides additional guidance on a creditor’s evaluation of whether it has granted a concession and whether a debtor is experiencing financial difficulties.  The additional guidance is intended to create additional consistency in the application of generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) for debt restructuring. The amendments in this Update are effective for the first interim or annual period beginning on or after June 15, 2011, and should be applied retrospectively to the beginning of the annual period of adoption. The Partnership is currently evaluating the effect this ASU will have on its financial statements.

In January 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-01 (“ASC Update 2011-01”), Deferral of the Effective Date of Disclosures about Troubled Debt Restructurings in Update No. 2010-20.  This ASU temporarily delays the effective date for public entities of the disclosures about troubled debt restructurings (TDRs) in ASU No. 2010-20, Disclosures about the Credit Quality of Financing Receivables and the Allowance for Credit Losses.  Currently, that guidance is anticipated to be effective for interim and annual periods ending after June 15, 2011. The Partnership is currently evaluating the effect this ASU will have on its financial statements.
 
 
8
 
 

 
3. Information Technology Equipment

The Partnership is the lessor of equipment under leases with periods that generally will range from 12 to 48 months.  In general, associated costs such as repairs and maintenance, insurance and property taxes are paid by the lessee. The Partnership determined that no impairment analysis was necessary at March 31, 2011 and 2010 as no impairment indicators were noted.

Remarketing fees will be paid to the leasing companies from which the Partnership purchases leases.  These are fees that are earned by the leasing companies when the initial terms of the lease have been met.  The General Partner believes that this strategy adds value since it entices the leasing company to remain actively involved with the lessees and encourages potential extensions, remarketing or sale of equipment.  This strategy is designed to minimize any conflicts the leasing company may have with a new lessee and may assist in maximizing overall portfolio performance.  The remarketing fee is tied into lease performance thresholds and is a factor in the negotiation of the fee.  No such fees were paid for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010. 
 
The Partnership’s share of the equipment in which it participates with other partnerships at March 31, 2011 was approximately $13,878,000 and is included in the Partnership’s fixed assets on its balance sheet. The total cost of the equipment shared by the Partnership with other partnerships at March 31, 2011 was approximately $34,064,000. The Partnership’s share of the outstanding debt associated with this equipment at March 31, 2011 was approximately $604,000. The total outstanding debt related to the equipment shared by the Partnership at March 31, 2011 was approximately $1,618,000.

The Partnership’s share of the equipment in which it participates with other partnerships at December 31, 2010 was approximately $13,880,000 and is included in the Partnership’s fixed assets on its balance sheet. The total cost of the equipment shared by the Partnership with other partnerships at December 31, 2010 was approximately $34,067,000. The Partnership’s share of the outstanding debt associated with this equipment at December 31, 2010 was approximately $707,000. The total outstanding debt related to the equipment shared by the Partnership at December 31, 2010 was approximately $1,916,000.

As the Partnership and the other programs managed by the General Partner increase their overall portfolio size, opportunities for shared participation are expected to continue. Sharing in the acquisition of a lease portfolio gives the fund an opportunity to acquire additional assets and revenue streams, while allowing the fund to remain diversified and reducing its overall risk with respect to one portfolio.  Thus, total shared equipment and related debt should continue to trend higher for the remainder of 2011 as the Partnership builds its portfolio.
 
The following is a schedule of future minimum rentals on non-cancellable operating leases at March 31, 2011:

       
Nine Months ended December 31, 2011
  $ 4,759,000  
Year ended December 31, 2012
    3,725,000  
Year ended December 31, 2013
    1,132,000  
Year ended December 31, 2014
    2,000  
    $ 9,618,000  

The following lists the components of the net investment in direct finance leases at March 31, 2011:
 
   
Amount
 
Total minimum lease payments to be received
  $ 222,000  
Estimated residual value of leased equipment (unguaranteed)
    25,000  
Less: unearned income
    (33,000 )
Net investment in direct finance leases
  $ 214,000  
 

 
9
 
 

 
Our finance lease customers operate in various industries, and we have no significant customer concentration in any one industry. We assess credit risk for all of our customers, including those that lease under finance leases. This credit risk is assessed using an internally developed model which incorporates credits scores from third party providers and our own customer risk ratings and is periodically reviewed. Our internal ratings are weighted based on the industry that the customer operates in.  Factors taken into consideration when assessing risk includes both general and industry specific qualitative and quantitative metrics.  We separately take in to consideration payment history, open lawsuits, liens and judgments.  Typically, we will not extend credit to a company that has been in business for less than 5 years or that has filed for bankruptcy within the same period. Our internally based model may classify a company as high risk based on our analysis of their audited financial statements. Additional considerations of high risk may include history of late payments, open lawsuits and liens or judgments. In an effort to mitigate risk, we typically require deposits from those in this category. The following table presents the credit risk profile, by creditworthiness category, of our finance lease receivables at March 31, 2011:

 Risk Level
 
Percent of Total
 
Low
    - %
Moderate-Low
    - %
Moderate
    100 %
Moderate-High
    - %
High
    - %
Net finance lease receivable
    100 %

As of March 31, 2011 we determined that we did not have a need for an allowance for uncollectible accounts associated with any of our finance leases, as there was no material risk of default.

The following is a schedule of future minimum rentals on noncancelable direct financing leases at March 31, 2011:

   
Amount
 
Nine Months ended December 31, 2011
  $ 83,000  
Year ended December 31, 2012
    103,000  
Year ended December 31, 2013
    36,000  
    $ 222,000  
 
4. Related Party Transactions

Receivables/Payables

As of March 31, 2011, the Partnership’s related party receivables and payables are short term, unsecured, and non-interest bearing.
 
Three months ended March 31,
 
2011
   
2010
 
             
Reimbursable expenses
           
Reimbursable expenses, which are charged to the Partnership by CCC in connection with the administration and operation of the Partnership, are allocated to the Partnership based upon several factors including, but not limited to, the number of investors, compliance issues, and the number of existing leases.
  $ 418,000     $ 361,000  
                 
Equipment acquisition fee
               
The General Partner earned an equipment acquisition fee of 4% of the purchase price of each item of equipment purchased as compensation for the negotiation of the acquisition of the equipment and lease thereof or sale under a conditional sales contract.   At March 31, 2011, the remaining balance of prepaid acquisition fees was approximately $149,000, which is expected to be earned in future periods.
  $ 18,000     $ 92,000  
 
Equipment management fee
           
The General Partner is entitled to be paid a monthly fee equal to the lesser of (i) the fees which would be charged by an independent third party for similar services for similar equipment or (ii) the sum of (a) two percent of (1) the gross lease revenues attributable to equipment which is subject to full payout net leases which contain net lease provisions plus (2) the purchase price paid on conditional sales contracts as received by the Partnership and (b) 5% of the gross lease revenues attributable to equipment which is subject to operating and capital leases.
  $ 94,000     $ 89,000  
 
 
10
 
 

 
5. Notes Payable

Notes payable consisted of the following approximate amounts:

   
March 31, 2011
   
December 31, 2010
 
                 
Installment note payable to bank; interest at 5.75% due in quarterly installments of $37,927 including interest, with final payments in January 2011
   
-
     
38,000
 
                 
Installment note payable to bank; interest at 6.21% due in monthly installments of $585 including interest, with final payment in May 2012
   
16,000
     
19,000
 
                 
Installment note payable to bank; interest at 7.50% due in quarterly installments of $8,843 including interest, with final payment in October 2012
   
57,000
     
65,000
 
                 
Installment notes payable to bank; interest at 5.89% due in monthly installments from $7,104 to $9,514 including interest, with final payment in October 2012
   
301,000
     
331,000
 
                 
Installment note payable to bank; interest at 7.50% due in monthly installments of $10,666 including interest, with final payment in April 2013
   
246,000
     
273,000
 
   
$
620,000
   
$
726,000
 
                 

The notes are secured by specific computer equipment and are nonrecourse liabilities of the Partnership.  As such, the notes do not contain any debt covenants with which we must comply on either an annual or quarterly basis.  Aggregate maturities of notes payable for each of the periods subsequent to March 31, 2011 are as follows: 

   
Amount
 
Nine months ending December 31, 2011
  $ 273,000  
Year ended December 31, 2012
    305,000  
Year ended December 31, 2013
    42,000  
    $  620,000  
 
6. Supplemental Cash Flow Information

Other noncash activities included in the determination of net loss are as follows:

Three months ended March 31,
 
2011
   
2010
 
Lease revenue net of interest expense on notes payable realized as a result of direct payment of principal by lessee to bank
  $ 106,000     $ 61,000  

No interest or principal on notes payable was paid by the Partnership because direct payment was made by lessee to the bank in lieu of collection of lease income and payment of interest and principal by the Partnership.
 
Noncash investing and financing activities include the following:

Three months ended March 31,
 
2011
   
2010
 
Equipment acquisition fees earned by General Partner upon purchase of equipment from prepaid acquisition fees
  $ 18,000     $ 92,000  
 
 
11
 
 

 
7. Commitments and Contingencies

On June 18, 2010, Commonwealth Capital Corp. (the parent of our general partner) filed suit on our behalf against Allied Health Care Services Inc. (“Allied”).  Allied is a lessee of medical equipment, and has failed to make its monthly lease payments since March 2010.  Our suit for breach of contract against Allied and its owner, Charles K. Schwartz, pursuant to a partial personal guaranty, was filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey (Case No 2:10-cv-03135), seeking payment of all outstanding rents, the value of leased equipment, and all costs of collection, including attorney’s fees.

On August 19, 2010 our suit was automatically stayed when an involuntary petition for relief under Chapter 7 of the Bankruptcy Code was filed against Allied in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of New Jersey.  On September 3, 2010, Charles Schwartz, the owner of Allied, was arrested by the FBI for alleged mail fraud in connection with his medical equipment leasing business.  Additionally, Commonwealth was one of the petitioning creditors in an involuntary Chapter 7 bankruptcy petition filed against Mr. Schwartz personally on September 17, 2010, in the same court.

In an effort to reduce potential loss related to the Allied matter, we ceased booking revenues on the Allied leases completely in July 2010, thereby eliminating future equipment management fees on the Allied leases.

Due to the bankruptcy proceedings, management can not determine, at this time, the status of the equipment leased to Allied or the amounts that may ultimately be paid to us from the bankruptcy estates.   The timeline for identifying and recovering assets is uncertain, with resolution depending in large part upon the Trustee’s resolution of certain legal disputes and the cooperation of the various parties involved. Due to the complexity of the alleged fraud and the number of parties involved, we expect that completion of asset recovery and distribution to creditors will take place in excess of twelve months.

Our share of exposure related to the Allied default (if no rent is collected, the equipment is not paid for and/or we are unable to obtain performance under partial personal guaranty) is approximately $1,700,000 as of March 31, 2011 net of a reserve taken against substantially all the Allied receivables.
 
Item 2: Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS

Certain statements within this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q may constitute forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (“PSLRA”). These statements are being made pursuant to the PSLRA, with the intention of obtaining the benefits of the “safe harbor” provisions of the PSLRA, and, other than as required by law, we assume no obligation to update or supplement such statements. Forward-looking statements are those that do not relate solely to historical fact. They include, but are not limited to, any statement that may predict, forecast, indicate or imply future results, performance, achievements or events. You can identify these statements by the use of words such as “may,” “will,” “could,” “anticipate,” “believe,” “estimate,” “expects,” “intend,” “predict” or “project” and variations of these words or comparable words or phrases of similar meaning. These forward-looking statements reflect our current beliefs and expectations with respect to future events and are based on assumptions and are subject to risks and uncertainties and other factors outside our control that may cause actual results to differ materially from those projected.
 
12
 
 

 
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Our discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations are based upon our financial statements which have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States. The preparation of these financial statements requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses. We base these estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.

We believe that our critical accounting policies affect our more significant judgments and estimates used in the preparation of our financial statements.
 
INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY EQUIPMENT

CCC, on our behalf and on behalf of other affiliated partnerships, acquires information technology equipment subject to associated debt obligations and lease revenue and allocates a participation in the cost, debt and lease revenue to the various partnerships based on certain risk factors.  Depreciation on information technology equipment for financial statement purposes is based on the straight-line method estimated generally over useful lives of two to four years.

The Equipment Lease Finance Association (“ELFA”) Monthly Leasing and Finance Index which reports economic activity for the $521 billion equipment finance sector, showed overall new business volume for the 1st quarter of 2011 increasing 27% over the first quarter of 2010.  Credit quality continues to improve as the rate of receivables aged in excess of 60 days has improved on average by 33% from the 1st quarter of 2010 through the 1st quarter of 2011.  The increase in new business volume is due largely to companies replacing aging equipment and expanding capacity in response to a recovering economy.  For 2011-2012 ELFA has forecast a 12% increase in finance volume over 2010.

ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE

We monitor our accounts receivable to ensure timely and accurate payment by lessees.  Our Lease Relations department is responsible for monitoring accounts receivable and, as necessary, resolving outstanding invoices.

We review a customer’s credit history before extending credit. In the event of a default, we may establish a provision for uncollectible accounts receivable based upon the credit risk of specific customers, historical trends or other information.
 
REVENUE RECOGNITION

Through March 31, 2011, the Partnership’s leasing operations consisted of operating and direct finance leases.  Operating lease revenue is recognized on a monthly basis in accordance with the terms of the lease agreement. For finance leases, we record, at lease inception, unearned finance lease income which is calculated as follows: total lease payments, plus any residual value and initial direct costs, less the cost of the leased equipment. Interest income is earned on the finance lease receivable over the lease term using the interest method.  As required, at each reporting period, management evaluates the finance lease for impairment and considers any need for an allowance for credit losses.

Our leases do not contain any step-rent provisions or escalation clauses nor are lease revenues adjusted based on any index.

We review a customer’s credit history before extending credit. In the event of a default, we may establish a provision for uncollectible accounts receivable based upon the credit risk of specific customers, historical trends or other information. 
 
13
 
 

 
LONG-LIVED ASSETS

We evaluate our long-lived assets when events or circumstances indicate that the value of the asset may not be recoverable.  We determine whether impairment exists by estimating the undiscounted cash flows to be generated by each asset.  If the estimated undiscounted cash flows are less than the carrying value of the asset then impairment exists.  The amount of the impairment is determined based on the difference between the carrying value and the fair value.  The fair value is determined based on estimated discounted cash flows to be generated by the asset. We determined no impairment analysis was necessary at March 31, 2011 and 2010 as no impairment indicators were noted.

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

Sources and Uses of Cash

Our primary source of cash for the three months ended March 31, 2011 was cash provided by operating activities of approximately $1,289,000, and from net proceeds from the sale of computer equipment of approximately $250,000, compared to the three months ended March 31, 2010 where our primary source of cash was provided by operating activities of approximately $972,000.  Our primary use of cash for the three months ended March 31, 2011 was for the purchase of new information technology equipment of approximately $454,000 and also for distributions to partners of approximately $905,000.  For the three months ended March 31, 2010, capital expenditures were approximately $2,307,000, and distributions to partners were approximately $905,000.

Cash was provided by operating activities for the three months ended March 31, 2011 of approximately $1,289,000, which includes a net loss of approximately $439,000 and depreciation and amortization expenses of approximately $1,829,000.  For the three months ended March 31, 2010 cash was also provided by operating activities of approximately $972,000, which includes a net loss of approximately $124,000 and depreciation and amortization expenses of approximately $1,422,000.

As we continue to increase the size of our equipment portfolio, operating expenses will increase, which reflects the administrative costs of servicing the portfolio, but because of our investment strategy of leasing technology equipment primarily through triple-net leases, we avoid operating expenses related to equipment maintenance or taxes.  Depreciation expenses will likely increase more rapidly than operating expenses as we add technology equipment to our portfolio.
 
Capital expenditures and distributions are expected to continue to increase overall during the remainder of 2011, however, as management focuses on additional equipment acquisitions and funding limited partner distributions. We intend to invest approximately $4,000,000 in additional equipment during the remainder of 2011.  The acquisition of this equipment will be funded by the remaining cash which was raised through limited partner contributions during the initial offering period, lease revenues and debt financing. Any debt service will be funded from cash flows from lease rental payments.
 
We consider cash and cash equivalents to be cash on hand and highly liquid investments with an original maturity of 90 days or less.

At March 31, 2011, cash was held in a total of seven accounts maintained at two separate financial institutions with an aggregate balance of approximately $2,337,000. Bank accounts are federally insured up to $250,000, while pursuant to the Dodd/Frank Act of 2010, some accounts are fully insured by the FDIC.  At March 31, 2011, the total cash balance was as follows:
 
At March 31, 2011
 
Balance
 
Total bank balance
 
$
2,337,000
 
FDIC insured
   
(883,000)
 
Uninsured amount
 
$
1,454,000
 

We mitigate the risk of holding uninsured deposits by depositing funds with more than one institution and by only depositing funds with major financial institutions.  We have not experienced any losses in such accounts, and believe that we are not exposed to any significant credit risk.  The amounts in such accounts will fluctuate throughout 2011 due to many factors, including the pace of additional cash receipts, equipment acquisitions and distributions to investors.

Our investment strategy of acquiring computer equipment and generally leasing it under triple-net leases to operators who generally meet specified financial standards minimizes our operating expenses.  As of March 31, 2011, we had future minimum rentals on non-cancelable operating leases of approximately $4,759,000 for the balance of the year ending December 31, 2011 and approximately $4,859,000 thereafter. As of March 31, 2011, we had future minimum rentals on non-cancelable finance leases of approximately $83,000 for the balance of the year ending December 31, 2011 and approximately $139,000 thereafter.

As of March 31, 2011, our debt was approximately $620,000 with interest rates ranging from 5.89% to 7.50% and will be payable through April 2013.
 
14
 
 

 
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Three months ended March 31, 2011 compared to three months ended March 31, 2010

For the three months ended March 31, 2011, we recognized revenue of approximately $1,954,000 and expenses of approximately $2,3413,000, resulting in a net loss of approximately $459,000.  This net loss is primarily due to an increase in depreciation expenses, equipment management fees and operating expenses associated with a larger portfolio of equipment compared to the three months ended March 31, 2010. We also recorded $20,000 in bad debt expense for the three months ended March 31, 2011. For the three months ended March 31, 2010, we recognized revenue of approximately $1,794,000 and expenses of approximately $1,918,000, resulting in a net loss of approximately $124,000.

Our lease revenue increased to approximately $1,879,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2011, from approximately $1,777,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2010.  This increase was primarily due the acquisition of new lease agreements since the three months ended March 31, 2010.

We recognized gain on the sale of equipment of approximately $60,000 for the three months ended Mach 31, 2011. This compares to the three months ended March 31, 2010, when we recognized gain on the sale of computer equipment of approximately $200. The increase is primarily due to an increase in the amount of assets sold.

The balances in our revenue accounts will fluctuate throughout 2011 due to many factors, including the pace of cash receipts, equipment acquisitions and distributions to limited partners.

Our operating expenses, excluding depreciation, primarily consist of accounting and legal fees, outside service fees and reimbursement of expenses to CCC for administration and operation of the Partnership.  These expenses increased to approximately $460,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2011, from approximately $403,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2010.  This increase is primarily attributable to increases in administrative expenses as daily operations within the fund continue as the portfolio size was increased. 

We pay an equipment management fee to our general partner for managing our equipment portfolio. The equipment management fee is approximately 5% of the gross lease revenue attributable to equipment that is subject to operating leases and approximately 2% of the gross lease revenue attributable to equipment that is subject to direct financing leases. The equipment management fee increased to approximately $94,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2011 from approximately $89,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2010, which is consistent with the increase in lease volume and revenue. As offering proceeds continue to be utilized for the acquisition of equipment, management fees are expected to increase throughout the reminder of 2011 as our equipment portfolio grows.

Depreciation and amortization expenses consist of depreciation on computer equipment and amortization of equipment acquisition fees. These expenses increased to approximately $1,829,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2011, from $1,422,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2010. This increase was due to the acquisition of new equipment associated with the purchase of new leases.
 
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

N/A

Item 4.  Controls and Procedures

Our management, under the supervision and with the participation of the Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer, have evaluated the effectiveness of our controls and procedures related to our reporting and disclosure obligations as of March 31, 2011 which is the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.  Based on that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are effective to provide that (a) material information relating to us, including our consolidated affiliates is made known to these officers by us and our consolidated affiliates’ other employees, particularly material information related to the period for which this periodic report is being prepared; and (b) this information is recorded, processed, summarized, evaluated and reported, as applicable, within the time periods specified in the rules and forms promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission.  There were no changes in the Partnership’s internal control over financial reporting during the first quarter of 2011 that have materially affected or are reasonably likely to materially affect its internal control over financial reporting.
 
 
15
 
 

 
Part II:   OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1.  Legal Proceedings

On June 18, 2010, Commonwealth Capital Corp. (the parent of our general partner) filed suit on our behalf against Allied Health Care Services Inc. (“Allied”).  Allied is a lessee of medical equipment, and has failed to make its monthly lease payments since March 2010.  Our suit for breach of contract against Allied and its owner, Charles K. Schwartz, pursuant to a partial personal guaranty, was filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey (Case No 2:10-cv-03135), seeking payment of all outstanding rents, the value of leased equipment, and all costs of collection, including attorney’s fees.

On August 19, 2010 our suit was automatically stayed when an involuntary petition for relief under Chapter 7 of the Bankruptcy Code was filed against Allied in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of New Jersey.  On September 3, 2010, Charles Schwartz, the owner of Allied, was arrested by the FBI for alleged mail fraud in connection with his medical equipment leasing business.  Additionally, Commonwealth was one of the petitioning creditors in an involuntary Chapter 7 bankruptcy petition filed against Mr. Schwartz personally on September 17, 2010, in the same court.

In an effort to reduce potential loss related to the Allied matter, we ceased booking revenues on the Allied leases completely in July 2010, thereby eliminating future equipment management fees on the Allied leases.

Due to the bankruptcy proceedings, management can not determine, at this time, the status of the equipment leased to Allied or the amounts that may ultimately be paid to us from the bankruptcy estates.   The timeline for identifying and recovering assets is uncertain, with resolution depending in large part upon the Trustee’s resolution of certain legal disputes and the cooperation of the various parties involved. Due to the complexity of the alleged fraud and the number of parties involved, we expect that completion of asset recovery and distribution to creditors will take place in excess of twelve months.

Our share of exposure related to the Allied default (if no rent is collected, the equipment is not paid for and/or we are unable to obtain performance under partial personal guaranty) is approximately $1,700,000 as of March 31, 2011 net of a reserve taken against substantially all the Allied receivables.
 
Item 1A.   Risk Factors

Changes in economic conditions could materially and negatively affect our business.
 
Our business is directly impacted by factors such as economic, political, and market conditions, broad trends in industry and finance, legislative and regulatory changes, changes in government monetary and fiscal policies, and inflation, all of which are beyond our control.  Beginning in 2008 and continuing through 2010, general worldwide economic conditions experienced a downturn.  Although we are experiencing a modest improvement in the global economy in 2011, the economic recovery continues to remain somewhat weak, and a prolonged period of economic weakness could result in the following consequences, any of which could materially affect our business: lease delinquencies may increase; problem leases and defaults could increase; and demand for information technology products generally may decrease as businesses attempt to reduce expenses.
 
Item 2.     Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
 
       N/A

Item 3.     Defaults Upon Senior Securities
 
       N/A

Item 5.   Other Information
 
       N/A
 
Item 6.   Exhibits
 
 
 
16
 
 

 
 
SIGNATURES
 
 
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
 
 
COMMONWEALTH INCOME & GROWTH FUND VI
 
BY: COMMONWEALTH INCOME & GROWTH FUND, INC., General Partner
 
May 16, 2011
By: /s/ Kimberly A. Springsteen-Abbott
Date
Kimberly A. Springsteen-Abbott
 
Chief Executive Officer
   
   
May 16, 2011
By: /s/ Lynn A. Franceschina
Date
Lynn A. Franceschina
 
Executive Vice President, Chief Operating Officer