Attached files
file | filename |
---|---|
EX-32.1 - EX-32.1 - SHERIDAN GROUP INC | a11-11804_1ex32d1.htm |
EX-31.2 - EX-31.2 - SHERIDAN GROUP INC | a11-11804_1ex31d2.htm |
EX-31.1 - EX-31.1 - SHERIDAN GROUP INC | a11-11804_1ex31d1.htm |
EX-10.57.A - EX-10.57.A - SHERIDAN GROUP INC | a11-11804_1ex10d57da.htm |
EX-10.57.B - EX-10.57.B - SHERIDAN GROUP INC | a11-11804_1ex10d57db.htm |
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, DC 20549
FORM 10Q
x |
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED MARCH 31, 2011
o |
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
FOR THE TRANSITION PERIOD FROM TO
COMMISSION FILE NUMBER 333110441
THE SHERIDAN GROUP, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Maryland |
|
521659314 |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) |
|
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
|
|
|
11311 McCormick Road, Suite 260 |
|
|
Hunt Valley, Maryland |
|
210311437 |
(Address of principal executive offices) |
|
(Zip Code) |
4107857277
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes o No x
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes o No o
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of large accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer o |
|
Accelerated filer o |
|
|
|
Non-accelerated filer x (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
|
Smaller reporting company o |
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.) Yes o No x
There was 1 share of Common Stock outstanding as of May 13, 2011.
The Sheridan Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Quarterly Report
For the Quarter Ended March 31, 2011
PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION
THE SHERIDAN GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(Unaudited)
|
|
March 31, |
|
December 31, |
| ||
|
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
| ||
Assets |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Current assets |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
5,304,186 |
|
$ |
13,717,082 |
|
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $2,392,434 and $2,261,252, respectively |
|
27,534,429 |
|
25,470,633 |
| ||
Inventories, net |
|
15,911,545 |
|
15,809,053 |
| ||
Other current assets |
|
5,007,201 |
|
5,962,519 |
| ||
Due from parent |
|
529,609 |
|
|
| ||
Total current assets |
|
54,286,970 |
|
60,959,287 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Property, plant and equipment, net |
|
114,056,388 |
|
112,044,062 |
| ||
Intangibles, net |
|
31,047,644 |
|
32,168,520 |
| ||
Goodwill |
|
33,978,641 |
|
33,978,641 |
| ||
Deferred financing costs, net |
|
282,132 |
|
516,286 |
| ||
Other assets |
|
1,474,619 |
|
1,843,739 |
| ||
Total assets |
|
$ |
235,126,394 |
|
$ |
241,510,535 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Current liabilities |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Accounts payable |
|
$ |
15,730,529 |
|
$ |
16,305,544 |
|
Accrued expenses |
|
13,526,610 |
|
15,541,858 |
| ||
Current portion of notes payable |
|
|
|
142,923,740 |
| ||
Due to parent |
|
|
|
534,440 |
| ||
Total current liabilities |
|
29,257,139 |
|
175,305,582 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Notes payable |
|
142,917,313 |
|
|
| ||
Deferred income taxes and other liabilities |
|
27,208,716 |
|
28,106,160 |
| ||
Total liabilities |
|
199,383,168 |
|
203,411,742 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Stockholders Equity |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Common stock, $0.01 par value; 100 shares authorized; 1 share issued and outstanding |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Additional paid-in capital |
|
42,083,037 |
|
42,075,908 |
| ||
Accumulated deficit |
|
(6,339,811 |
) |
(3,977,115 |
) | ||
Total stockholders equity |
|
35,743,226 |
|
38,098,793 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
$ |
235,126,394 |
|
$ |
241,510,535 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the condensed consolidated financial statements.
THE SHERIDAN GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2011 and 2010
(Unaudited)
|
|
Three Months Ended |
| ||||
|
|
March 31, |
| ||||
|
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Net sales |
|
$ |
68,188,990 |
|
$ |
68,298,350 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Cost of sales |
|
56,603,052 |
|
53,524,116 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Gross profit |
|
11,585,938 |
|
14,774,234 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Selling and administrative expenses |
|
9,955,602 |
|
9,382,979 |
| ||
Loss on disposition of fixed assets |
|
23,991 |
|
33,343 |
| ||
Restructuring costs |
|
377,229 |
|
72,368 |
| ||
Amortization of intangibles |
|
1,120,876 |
|
349,504 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Total operating expenses |
|
11,477,698 |
|
9,838,194 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Operating income |
|
108,240 |
|
4,936,040 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Other (income) expense: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Interest expense |
|
3,929,619 |
|
3,948,813 |
| ||
Interest income |
|
(890 |
) |
(12,862 |
) | ||
Other, net |
|
(9,916 |
) |
(37,320 |
) | ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Total other expense |
|
3,918,813 |
|
3,898,631 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
(Loss) income before income taxes |
|
(3,810,573 |
) |
1,037,409 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Income tax benefit |
|
(1,447,877 |
) |
(509,040 |
) | ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Net (loss) income |
|
$ |
(2,362,696 |
) |
$ |
1,546,449 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the condensed consolidated financial statements.
THE SHERIDAN GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2011 and 2010
(Unaudited)
|
|
March 31, |
|
March 31, |
| ||
|
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
| ||
Cash flows (used in) provided by operating actvities: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Net (loss) income |
|
$ |
(2,362,696 |
) |
$ |
1,546,449 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net (loss) income to net cash (used in) provided by operating activities |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Depreciation |
|
5,684,472 |
|
4,351,882 |
| ||
Amortization of intangible assets |
|
1,120,876 |
|
349,504 |
| ||
Provision for doubtful accounts |
|
183,673 |
|
662,198 |
| ||
Provision for inventory realizability |
|
25,906 |
|
86,839 |
| ||
Stock-based compensation |
|
7,129 |
|
|
| ||
Amortization of deferred financing costs and debt discount, included in interest expense |
|
227,727 |
|
244,168 |
| ||
Deferred income tax benefit |
|
(398,641 |
) |
(1,080,092 |
) | ||
Loss on disposition of fixed assets |
|
23,991 |
|
33,343 |
| ||
Changes in operating assets and liabilities |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Accounts receivable |
|
(2,247,469 |
) |
(160,768 |
) | ||
Inventories |
|
(128,398 |
) |
(844,136 |
) | ||
Other current assets |
|
958,883 |
|
167,821 |
| ||
Other assets |
|
369,120 |
|
101,847 |
| ||
Accounts payable |
|
(496,367 |
) |
(430,462 |
) | ||
Accrued expenses |
|
(2,015,248 |
) |
(3,685,495 |
) | ||
Due to parent, net |
|
(1,064,049 |
) |
439,941 |
| ||
Other liabilities |
|
(502,368 |
) |
(256,007 |
) | ||
Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities |
|
(613,459 |
) |
1,527,032 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Cash flows used in investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Purchases of property, plant and equipment |
|
(7,806,204 |
) |
(1,163,740 |
) | ||
Proceeds from sale of fixed assets |
|
6,767 |
|
30,475 |
| ||
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
(7,799,437 |
) |
(1,133,265 |
) | ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents |
|
(8,412,896 |
) |
393,767 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
|
13,717,082 |
|
4,109,740 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
|
$ |
5,304,186 |
|
$ |
4,503,507 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Non-cash investing and financing activities |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Asset additions in accounts payable |
|
$ |
709,345 |
|
$ |
275,552 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the condensed consolidated financial statements.
THE SHERIDAN GROUP, INC. and SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
1. Company Information and Significant Accounting Policies
The accompanying unaudited financial statements of The Sheridan Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries (together, the Company) have been prepared by us pursuant to the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the SEC). In our opinion, the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements contain all adjustments necessary to present fairly, in all material respects, our financial position as of March 31, 2011 and our results of operations and our cash flows for the three month periods ended March 31, 2011 and 2010. All such adjustments are deemed to be of a normal and recurring nature and all material intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated. The year-end condensed balance sheet data was derived from audited financial statements, but does not include all disclosures required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
These condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the annual consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto of The Sheridan Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries included in our Annual Report on Form 10K for the year ended December 31, 2010. Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America have been condensed or omitted. The results of operations for the three months ended March 31, 2011 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full fiscal year.
The preparation of condensed consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Certain previously reported amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current year presentation.
New Accounting Standards
In December 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-29, an amendment to the disclosure of supplementary pro forma information for business combinations (EITF Issue 10-G; ASC 805, Business Combinations). This amendment specified that if a public entity presents comparative financial statements, the entity should disclose revenue and earnings of the combined entity as though the business combination(s) that occurred during the current year had occurred as of the beginning of the comparable prior annual reporting period only. The amendment also expanded the supplemental pro forma disclosures under ASC 805 to include a description of the nature and amount of material, nonrecurring pro forma adjustments directly attributable to the business combination included in the reported pro forma revenue and earnings. This is effective prospectively for business combinations for which the acquisition date is on or after the beginning of the first annual reporting period beginning on or after December 15, 2010. Early adoption is permitted. The adoption of this amendment did not have an impact on our financial statements.
In December 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-28, an amendment to the goodwill impairment test for reporting units with zero or negative carrying amounts (EITF Issue 10-A; ASC 350, Intangibles-Goodwill and Other). The amendment affects all entities that have recognized goodwill and have one or more reporting units whose carrying amount for purposes of performing Step 1 of the goodwill impairment test is zero or negative. As a result, the amendment eliminates an entitys ability to assert that a reporting unit is not required to perform Step 2 because the carrying amount of the reporting unit is zero or negative despite the existence of qualitative factors that indicate the goodwill is more likely than not impaired. For public entities, the amendment is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2010. Early adoption is not permitted. Upon adoption of the amendments, an entity with reporting units that have carrying amounts that are zero or negative is required to assess whether it is more likely than not that the reporting units goodwill is impaired. If the entity determines that it is more likely than not that the goodwill of one or more of its reporting units is impaired, the entity should perform Step 2 of the goodwill impairment test for those reporting unit(s). Any resulting goodwill impairment should be recorded as a cumulative-effect adjustment to beginning retained earnings in the period of adoption. Any goodwill impairments occurring after the initial adoption of the amendments should be included in earnings as required by Section 350-20-35. The adoption of this amendment did not have an impact on our financial statements.
2. Inventory
Components of net inventories at March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010 were as follows:
|
|
March 31, |
|
December 31, |
| ||
|
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
| ||
Work-in-process |
|
$ |
6,093,096 |
|
$ |
6,617,642 |
|
Raw materials (principally paper) |
|
10,121,559 |
|
9,494,521 |
| ||
|
|
16,214,655 |
|
16,112,163 |
| ||
Excess of current cost over LIFO inventory value |
|
(303,110 |
) |
(303,110 |
) | ||
|
|
$ |
15,911,545 |
|
$ |
15,809,053 |
|
3. Notes Payable and Working Capital Facility
On April 15, 2011, we completed a private debt offering, the proceeds of which, net of discount, along with borrowings under the working capital facility and cash on hand were used to repurchase and redeem all of our outstanding debt, as discussed as a subsequent event in Note 11. As such, we have classified our outstanding debt as long-term as of March 31, 2011 because we refinanced our debt on a long-term basis.
On August 21, 2003, we completed a private debt offering of 10.25% senior secured notes totaling $105.0 million, priced to yield 10.50%, that mature August 15, 2011 (the 2003 Notes). On May 25, 2004, we completed a private debt offering of 10.25% senior secured notes totaling $60.0 million, priced to yield 9.86%, that mature August 15, 2011 (the 2004 Notes). The 2004 Notes have identical terms to the 2003 Notes. During the year ended December 31, 2009, we paid $15.0 million, which included $0.5 million of accrued interest, to repurchase 2003 Notes and 2004 Notes with a face value of $22.1 million. The carrying value of the 2003 Notes and the 2004 Notes was $142.9 million as of March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010.
The 2003 Notes and the 2004 Notes are collateralized by security interests in substantially all of our assets, subject to permitted liens. The capital stock, securities and other payment rights of our subsidiaries will constitute collateral for the 2003 Notes and the 2004 Notes only to the extent that Rule 3-10 and Rule 3-16 of Regulation S-X under the Securities Act do not require separate financial statements of a subsidiary to be filed with the SEC. Payment obligations under the 2003 Notes and the 2004 Notes are guaranteed jointly and severally, fully and unconditionally, by all of our subsidiaries. The Sheridan Group, Inc. (the stand-alone parent company) owns 100% of the outstanding stock of all of its subsidiaries and has no material independent assets or operations. There are no restrictions on the ability of The Sheridan Group, Inc. (the stand-alone parent company) to obtain funds by dividend, advance or loan from its subsidiaries.
Concurrent with the offering of the 2003 Notes, we entered into a working capital facility agreement. On June 16, 2009, we executed an agreement to amend our working capital facility. Terms of the working capital facility allow for revolving debt of up to $20.0 million, including letters of credit commitments of up to $5.0 million, subject to a borrowing base test. The interest rate on borrowings under the working capital facility is a fluctuating rate equal to the highest of (a) the Federal Funds Rate plus 0.50%, (b) the banks prime rate, or (c) the LIBOR rate plus a margin of 3.75%. At our option, we can elect a LIBOR option for a specified period. Any such borrowings bear interest at the specified LIBOR rate plus a margin of 3.75%. We have agreed to pay an annual commitment fee on the unused portion of the working capital facility at a rate of 0.50%. In addition, we have agreed to pay an annual fee of 3.875% on all letters of credit outstanding. The working capital facility is scheduled to mature on May 25, 2011. As of March 31, 2011, we had no borrowings outstanding under the working capital facility, had unused amounts available of $18.7 million and had $1.3 million in outstanding letters of credit.
Borrowings under the working capital facility are collateralized by the assets of the Company and our subsidiaries, subject to permitted liens. The working capital facility contains various covenants including provisions that restrict our ability to incur or prepay indebtedness, including the 2003 Notes and the 2004 Notes, or pay dividends. It also requires us to satisfy financial tests, such as an interest coverage ratio and the maintenance of a minimum amount of earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (as defined in the working capital facility agreement). We have complied with all of the restrictive covenants as of March 31, 2011.
4. Accrued Expenses
Accrued expenses as of March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010 consisted of the following:
|
|
March 31, |
|
December 31, |
| ||
|
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
| ||
Payroll and related expenses |
|
$ |
4,330,245 |
|
$ |
3,177,493 |
|
Profit sharing accrual |
|
231,033 |
|
435,874 |
| ||
Accrued interest |
|
1,853,777 |
|
5,517,147 |
| ||
Customer prepayments |
|
3,377,461 |
|
3,298,520 |
| ||
Self-insured health and workers compensation accrual |
|
1,684,461 |
|
1,631,830 |
| ||
Other |
|
2,049,633 |
|
1,480,994 |
| ||
|
|
$ |
13,526,610 |
|
$ |
15,541,858 |
|
5. Business Segments
We are a specialty printer offering a full range of printing and value-added support services for the journal, catalog, magazine and book markets. We operate in three business segments: Publications, Specialty Catalogs and Books. The Publications segment is focused on the production of short-run journals, medium-run journals and specialty magazines and is comprised of the assets and operations of The Sheridan Press, Dartmouth Printing, United Litho and Dartmouth Journal Services. Our Books segment is focused on the production of short-run books and is comprised of the assets and operations of Sheridan Books. The Specialty Catalogs segment, which is comprised of the assets and operations of The Dingley Press, is focused on catalog merchants that require run lengths between 50,000 and 8,500,000 copies.
The accounting policies of the operating segments are the same as those described in Note 2 Summary of Significant Accounting Policies in the consolidated financial statements in our most recent Annual Report on Form 10K for the year ended December 31, 2010. The results of each segment include certain allocations for general, administrative and other shared costs. However, certain costs, such as corporate profit sharing and bonuses, are not allocated to the segments. Our customer base resides in the continental United States, and our manufacturing, warehouse and office facilities are located throughout the East Coast and Midwest.
We had no customer that accounted for 10.0% or more of our net sales for the three month periods ended March 31, 2011 and 2010.
The following table provides segment information as of March 31, 2011 and 2010 and for the three month periods then ended:
|
|
Three months ended March 31, |
| ||||
(in thousands) |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Net sales |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Publications |
|
$ |
36,198 |
|
$ |
37,766 |
|
Specialty catalogs |
|
18,276 |
|
17,032 |
| ||
Books |
|
13,793 |
|
13,502 |
| ||
Intersegment sales elimination |
|
(78 |
) |
(2 |
) | ||
Consolidated total |
|
$ |
68,189 |
|
$ |
68,298 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Operating income |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Publications |
|
$ |
492 |
|
$ |
3,704 |
|
Specialty catalogs |
|
(221 |
) |
788 |
| ||
Books |
|
691 |
|
892 |
| ||
Corporate expenses |
|
(854 |
) |
(448 |
) | ||
Consolidated total |
|
$ |
108 |
|
$ |
4,936 |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
December 31, |
| ||
|
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
| ||
Assets |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Publications |
|
$ |
134,250 |
|
$ |
140,566 |
|
Specialty catalogs |
|
58,373 |
|
51,669 |
| ||
Books |
|
40,235 |
|
46,519 |
| ||
Corporate |
|
2,268 |
|
2,757 |
| ||
Consolidated total |
|
$ |
235,126 |
|
$ |
241,511 |
|
A reconciliation of total segment operating income to consolidated (loss) income before income taxes is as follows:
|
|
Three months ended March 31, |
| ||||
(in thousands) |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Total operating income (as shown above) |
|
$ |
108 |
|
$ |
4,936 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Interest expense |
|
(3,930 |
) |
(3,949 |
) | ||
Interest income |
|
1 |
|
13 |
| ||
Other, net |
|
10 |
|
37 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
(Loss) income before income taxes |
|
$ |
(3,811 |
) |
$ |
1,037 |
|
6. Income Taxes
We recorded income tax benefit during the three months ended March 31, 2011 based on an estimated effective income tax rate for the year ended December 31, 2011 of approximately 40%, which was partially offset by discrete adjustments resulting in an effective tax rate of approximately 38%. We recorded income tax expense during the three months ended March 31, 2010 based on an estimated effective income tax rate of approximately 27%. Certain adjustments for items discrete to the three months ended March 31, 2010 were recognized which exceeded the tax expense recorded during the period, resulting in a net income tax benefit of approximately $0.5 million. The most significant discrete item was a change in the apportionment rules which resulted in a decrease in the income taxes we pay to the State of Maine.
We file consolidated tax returns with TSG Holdings Corp. (Parent), our parent company, for Federal and certain state jurisdictions. We classify the current tax assets as Due from parent and the current tax liabilities as Due to parent, as appropriate, on the consolidated balance sheets.
7. Fair Value Measurements
Certain of our assets and liabilities must be recorded at fair value. Fair value is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date (an exit price). Accounting guidance outlines a valuation framework and creates a fair value hierarchy in order to increase the consistency and comparability of fair value measurements and the related disclosures and prioritizes the inputs used in measuring fair value as follows:
Level 1: Observable inputs such as quoted prices in active markets;
Level 2: Inputs, other than quoted prices in active markets, that are observable either directly or indirectly; and
Level 3: Unobservable inputs in which there is little or no market data which require the reporting entity to develop its own assumptions.
Our financial instruments consist of long-term investments in marketable securities (held in trust for payment of non-qualified deferred compensation) and long-term debt. We are permitted to measure certain financial assets and financial liabilities at fair value that were not previously required to be measured at fair value. We have elected not to measure any financial assets or financial liabilities, including long-term debt, at fair value which were not previously required to be measured at fair value. We classify the investments in marketable securities within level 1 of the hierarchy since they are invested in publicly traded mutual funds with quoted market prices that are available in active markets.
8. Related Party Transactions
Under the terms of a management agreement with our principal equity sponsors, we paid an annual management fee equal to the greater of $500,000 or 2% of EBITDA (as defined in the management agreement) plus reasonable outofpocket expenses. We expensed $0.5 million and $0.2 million in such fees for the three month periods ended March 31, 2011 and 2010.
On April 15, 2011, the management agreement was terminated, and there will be no amounts expensed in connection with the management agreement subsequent to the three month period ended March 31, 2011.
9. Contingencies
We are party to legal actions as a result of various claims arising in the normal course of business. We believe that the disposition of these matters will not have a material adverse effect on the financial condition, results of operations or liquidity of the Company.
10. Restructuring and Other Exit Costs
Due to continued adverse trends in the specialty magazine business (within our Publications segment) as a result of the weak economy, on January 19, 2011, our Board of Directors approved a restructuring plan to consolidate all specialty magazine printing operations into one site. We will consolidate the printing of specialty magazines at Dartmouth Printing Company in Hanover, New Hampshire and close the United Litho facility in Ashburn, Virginia. Approximately 80 positions will be eliminated as a result of the closure. It is expected that approximately 20 employees in the Customer Service and Sales areas will be retained by Dartmouth Printing Company.
We recorded $0.4 million of restructuring charges during the three months ended March 31, 2011, including $0.3 million of charges related to severance and other personnel costs and $0.1 million of other exit costs. We estimate approximately $1.7 million of additional restructuring charges resulting in future cash expenditures will be incurred during 2011, including $1.1 million of charges related to severance and other personnel costs and $0.6 million of other exit costs. We had a liability of $0.3 million related to this restructuring outstanding as of March 31, 2011.
The table below shows the restructuring accrual balance and activity (in thousands):
Restructuring accrual at December 31, 2010 |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Restructuring costs expensed |
|
377 |
| |
Restructuring costs paid |
|
(86 |
) | |
|
|
|
| |
Restructuring accrual at March 31, 2011 |
|
$ |
291 |
|
We recorded a non-cash charge of $0.7 million during the three months ended March 31, 2011 associated with the accelerated amortization of the United Litho trade name based on updated estimates of useful life. We estimate that we will incur approximately $0.9 million in additional non-cash charges in 2011 associated with the accelerated amortization of the trade name.
We also recorded a non-cash charge of approximately $1.3 million during the three months ended March 31, 2011 associated with the accelerated depreciation of equipment, based on updated estimates of remaining useful life and estimated residual value, equal to the lower of carrying value or best estimate of selling price, less costs to sell. We estimate that we will incur approximately $1.7 million in additional non-cash charges in 2011 associated with the accelerated amortization of the equipment.
On February 3, 2011, we entered into a contract to sell the Ashburn, Virginia facility for $4.2 million, which after deducting related closing costs; we estimate our net proceeds to be approximately $3.8 million. We are accelerating the depreciation of the property, which had a net book value of approximately $3.9 million as of December 31, 2010, down to the amount of the estimated net proceeds, over the expected remaining service period prior to consolidating the operations at the Dartmouth Printing Company facility. We estimate the remaining depreciation expense to be less than $0.1 million. Consummation of the transaction is conditioned upon satisfaction of specific terms and conditions and delivery of specific documents, which are customary for similar transactions. The closing is scheduled for October 31, 2011.
The assets will be classified as held-for-sale, at their estimated net realizable values, once they are available for immediate sale after ceasing operations.
11. Subsequent Events
On April 15, 2011, we completed a private debt offering of senior secured notes totaling $150.0 million in aggregate principal amount (the 2011 Notes). The 2011 Notes, which were issued by The Sheridan Group, Inc. (the Issuer) under an indenture (the Indenture), will mature on April 15, 2014 and bear interest payable in cash in arrears at the fixed interest rate of 12.5% per year. Interest on the 2011 Notes will be payable semi-annually on April 15 and October 15 of each year, commencing on October 15, 2011. Proceeds of the offering of $141.0 million, net of discount, together with cash on hand and borrowings under our working capital facility, were used to repurchase all of our existing notes payable, the 2003 Notes and 2004 Notes, and to pay related fees and expenses. We will recognize a loss on the repurchase of the 2003 Notes and 2004 Notes of approximately $1.4 million.
The 2011 Notes are fully and unconditionally guaranteed on a senior secured basis by all of our current subsidiaries.
The 2011 Notes and the related guarantees rank equally in right of payment with all of the Issuers and the guarantors senior obligations and senior to all of the Issuers and the guarantors subordinated obligations.
The 2011 Notes and the related guarantees, respectively, are secured by a lien on substantially all of the Issuers and the guarantors current and future assets (other than certain excluded assets), subject to permitted liens and other limitations, and by a limited recourse pledge of all of the Issuers capital stock by Parent.
The Issuers and the guarantors obligations under our working capital facility are secured by a lien on substantially all of the Issuers and the guarantors assets. Pursuant to an intercreditor agreement between the trustee under the Indenture and the lender under our working capital facility, (1) in the case of real property, fixtures and equipment that secure the 2011 Notes and guarantees, the lien securing the notes and the guarantees will be senior to the lien securing borrowings, other credit extensions and guarantees under our working capital facility and (2) in the case of the other assets of the Issuer and the guarantors (including the shares of stock of the Issuer and the guarantors) that secure the 2011 Notes and guarantees, the lien securing the 2011 Notes and the related guarantees is contractually subordinated to the lien thereon securing borrowings, other credit extensions and guarantees under our working capital facility. Consequently, the 2011 Notes and
the related guarantees are effectively subordinated to the borrowings, other credit extensions and guarantees under our working capital facility to the extent of the value of such other assets.
The Indenture requires that we maintain certain minimum Consolidated EBITDA (as defined in the Indenture) levels for any period of four consecutive fiscal quarters, taken as one accounting period, and prohibits us from making capital expenditures in amounts exceeding certain thresholds for the period beginning on April 15, 2011 and ending on December 31, 2011 and for each fiscal year thereafter. In addition, the Indenture contains covenants that, subject to a number of important exceptions and qualifications, limit the Issuers ability and the ability of our restricted subsidiaries to, among other things: pay dividends, redeem stock or make other distributions or restricted payments; incur indebtedness; make certain investments; create liens; agree to restrictions on the payment of dividends; consolidate or merge; sell or otherwise transfer or dispose of assets, including equity interests of our restricted subsidiaries; enter into transactions with our affiliates; designate our subsidiaries as unrestricted subsidiaries; use the proceeds of permitted sales of our assets; and change business lines. If an event of default, as specified in the Indenture, shall occur and be continuing, either the trustee or the holders of a specified percentage of the 2011 Notes may accelerate the maturity of all the 2011 Notes.
If the Ashburn, Virginia property of United Litho is sold on or prior to December 31, 2011, we will be required to use the net proceeds of such sale to redeem 2011 Notes at 100% of their principal amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest (and liquidated damages, if any) to the redemption date. In addition, if we sell certain assets (other than such specified property) or experience an event of loss and we do not use the proceeds for specified purposes, we may be required to use the proceeds to repurchase the 2011 Notes at a repurchase price equal to 100% of their principal amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest (and liquidated damages, if any) to the date of repurchase.
Subject to certain conditions, we are required to make an offer to purchase 2011 Notes with 75% of our Excess Cash Flow (as defined in the Indenture) following the end of each of (1) the fiscal year ending on December 31, 2011, (2) the fiscal year ending on December 31, 2012 and (3) the three consecutive fiscal quarters ended September 30, 2013 at a repurchase price equal to 100% of their principal amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest (and liquidated damages, if any) to the date of repurchase.
We may redeem some or all of the 2011 Notes at any time prior to April 15, 2012 by paying a make-whole premium, plus accrued and unpaid interest (and liquidated damages, if any) to the redemption date. In addition, at any time prior to April 15, 2012, we may use the net proceeds of certain equity offerings to redeem up to 35% of the principal amount of the 2011 Notes at a redemption price equal to 112.5% of their principal amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest (and liquidated damages, if any) to the redemption date; provided that at least 65% of the aggregate principal amount of such 2011 Notes originally issued remain outstanding immediately following such redemption and such redemption occurs within 90 days of such equity offering. Furthermore, if we experience specific kinds of change of control, the holders of the 2011 Notes will have the right to require us to repurchase their 2011 Notes at a repurchase price equal to 101% of their principal amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest (and liquidated damages, if any) to the date of repurchase.
We may also redeem the notes, in whole or in part, at the redemption prices specified in the Indenture, plus accrued and unpaid interest (and liquidated damages, if any) to the redemption date.
Under a registration rights agreement we have agreed to (1) file, no later than 90 days after the issue date of the 2011 Notes, a registration statement with the SEC with respect to a registered offer to exchange the 2011 Notes for new notes having terms substantially identical in all material respects to the 2011 Notes (except that the new notes will not contain terms with respect to transfer restrictions), (2) use our reasonable best efforts to cause the registration statement to become effective within 240 days of the issue date of the 2011 Notes and (3) use our reasonable best efforts to commence and complete the exchange offer promptly, but no later than 30 days after the date on which the registration statement has become effective.
In addition, we have agreed, in some circumstances, to file a shelf registration statement that would allow some or all of the 2011 Notes to be offered to the public. If we do not comply with our obligations under the registration rights agreement, we will be required to pay the liquidated damages specified in the registration rights agreement to holders of the 2011 Notes.
On April 15, 2011, we entered into an agreement to amend and restate our working capital facility to, among other things, extend the scheduled maturity to April 15, 2013. Terms of the amended and restated working capital facility allow for revolving debt of up to $15.0 million, including letters of credit commitments of up to $5.0 million, subject to a borrowing base test. The interest rate on borrowings under the working capital facility is the base rate plus a margin of 3.25%. The base rate is a fluctuating rate equal to the highest of (a) the Federal Funds Rate plus 0.50%, (b) the banks prime rate, and (c) the specified LIBOR rate plus 1.00%. At our option, we can elect for borrowings to bear interest for specified periods at the specified LIBOR rate in effect for such periods plus a margin of 4.25%.
We have agreed to pay an annual commitment fee on the unused portion of the working capital facility at a rate of 0.75% and an annual fee of 4.25% on all letters of credit outstanding. In addition, we paid an upfront fee of $0.3 million at closing.
The working capital facility is secured as described above.
The working capital facility requires us to maintain certain minimum Consolidated EBITDA (as defined in the working capital facility) levels for any period of four consecutive fiscal quarters, taken as one accounting period, and prohibits us from making capital expenditures in amounts exceeding certain thresholds for the period beginning on April 15, 2011 and ending on December 31, 2011 and for each fiscal year thereafter. In addition, the working capital facility contains affirmative and negative covenants, representations and warranties, borrowing conditions, events of default and remedies for the lender. The aggregate loan or any individual loan made under the working capital facility may be prepaid at any time subject to certain restrictions.
In accordance with the terms of the working capital facility, payment of the borrowings may be accelerated at the option of the lender if an event of default, as defined in the working capital facility agreement, occurs. Events of default include, without limitation, nonpayment of principal and interest by the due date; failure to perform or observe certain specific covenants; material breach of representations or warranties; default as to other indebtedness (including under the notes); certain events of bankruptcy and insolvency; inability or failure to pay debts as they come due; the entry of certain judgments against us; certain liabilities with regard to ERISA plans; the invalidity of any documents in connection with the working capital facility; a change in control of the Company; or an event effecting the subordination of certain indebtedness.
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
The following discussion should be read in conjunction with, and is qualified in its entirety by reference to, our historical consolidated financial statements and related notes included in the Annual Report on Form 10K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010. References to the Company refer to The Sheridan Group, Inc. The terms we, us, our and other similar terms refer to the consolidated businesses of the Company and all of its subsidiaries.
ForwardLooking Statements
This Quarterly Report on Form 10Q includes forwardlooking statements. Forwardlooking statements are those that do not relate solely to historical fact. They include, but are not limited to, any statement that may predict, forecast, indicate or imply future results, performance, achievements or events. They may contain words such as anticipate, believe, continue, could, estimate, expect, intend, likely, may, plan, predict, project, should, will, would or words or phrases of similar meaning. They may relate to, among other things:
· our liquidity and capital resources, including our ability to refinance our debt;
· competitive pressures and trends in the printing industry;
· prevailing interest rates;
· legal proceedings and regulatory matters;
· general economic conditions;
· the liquidity and capital resources of our customers and potential customers;
· predictions of net sales, expenses or other financial items;
· future operations, financial condition and prospects; and
· our plans, objectives, strategies and expectations for the future.
Forwardlooking statements involve risks and uncertainties that may cause actual results to differ materially from the forwardlooking statements, might cause us to modify our plans or objectives, may affect our ability to pay timely amounts due under our outstanding notes and/or may affect the value of our outstanding notes. New risk factors can emerge from time to time. It is not possible for us to predict all of these risks, nor can we assess the extent to which any factor, or combination of factors, may cause actual results to differ from those contained in forwardlooking statements. Given these risks and uncertainties, actual future results may be materially different from what we plan or expect. We caution you that any forwardlooking statement reflects only our belief at the time the statement is made. We will not update these forwardlooking statements even if our situation changes in the future.
Overview
Company Background
We are a leading specialty printer offering a full range of printing and value-added support services for the journal, catalog, magazine and book markets. We provide a wide range of printing services and value-added support services that supplement the core printing operations such as page composition, electronic copy-editing, digital proofing, electronic publishing systems, subscriber services, digital media distribution, custom publishing and back issue fulfillment. We utilize a decentralized management structure, which provides our customers with access to the resources of a large company, while maintaining the high level of service and flexibility of a smaller company.
2011 Notes and Amended and Restated Working Capital Facility
On April 15, 2011, we completed a private debt offering of senior secured notes totaling $150.0 million in aggregate principal amount (the 2011 Notes). The 2011 Notes will mature on April 15, 2014 and bear interest payable in cash in arrears at the fixed interest rate of 12.5% per year. On the same date, we entered into an agreement to amend and restate our working capital facility to, among other things, extend the scheduled maturity to April 15, 2013. Terms of the amended and restated working capital facility allow for revolving debt of up to $15.0 million, including letters of credit commitments of up to $5.0 million, subject to a borrowing base test.
Proceeds of the 2011 Notes offering of $141.0 million, net of discount, together with cash on hand and borrowings under our working capital facility were used to repurchase all of our existing 2003 Notes and 2004 Notes (due in 2011) and to pay related fees and expenses.
Restructuring costs and facility shutdown
Due to continued adverse trends in the specialty magazine business (within our Publications segment) as a result of the weak economy, on January 19, 2011, our Board of Directors approved a restructuring plan to consolidate all specialty magazine printing operations into one site. We will consolidate the printing of specialty magazines at Dartmouth Printing Company in Hanover, New Hampshire and close the United Litho facility in Ashburn, Virginia. Approximately 80 positions will be eliminated as a result of the closure. It is expected that approximately 20 employees in the Customer Service and Sales areas will be retained by Dartmouth Printing Company.
We recorded $0.4 million of restructuring charges during the three months ended March 31, 2011, including $0.3 million of charges related to severance and other personnel costs and $0.1 million of other exit costs. We estimate approximately $1.7 million of additional restructuring charges resulting in future cash expenditures will be incurred during 2011, including $1.1 million of charges related to severance and other personnel costs and $0.6 million of other exit costs. We had a liability of $0.3 million related to this restructuring outstanding as of March 31, 2011.
The table below shows the restructuring accrual balance and activity (in thousands):
Restructuring accrual at December 31, 2010 |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Restructuring costs expensed |
|
377 |
| |
Restructuring costs paid |
|
(86 |
) | |
|
|
|
| |
Restructuring accrual at March 31, 2011 |
|
$ |
291 |
|
We recorded a non-cash charge of $0.7 million during the three months ended March 31, 2011 associated with the accelerated amortization of the United Litho trade name. We estimate that we will incur approximately $0.9 million in additional non-cash charges in 2011 associated with the accelerated amortization of the trade name.
We also recorded a non-cash charge of approximately $1.3 million during the three months ended March 31, 2011 associated with the accelerated depreciation of equipment, based on updated estimates of remaining useful life and estimated residual value, equal to the lower of carrying value or best estimate of selling price, less costs to sell. We estimate that we will incur approximately $1.7 million in additional non-cash charges in 2011 associated with the accelerated amortization of the equipment.
On February 3, 2011, we entered into a contract to sell the Ashburn, Virginia facility for $4.2 million, which after deducting related closing costs; we estimate our net proceeds to be approximately $3.8 million. We are accelerating the depreciation of the property, which had a net book value of approximately $3.9 million as of December 31, 2010, down to the amount of the estimated net proceeds, over the expected remaining service period prior to consolidating the operations at the Dartmouth Printing Company facility. We estimate the remaining depreciation expense to be less than $0.1 million. Consummation of the transaction is conditioned upon satisfaction of specific terms and conditions and delivery of specific documents, which are customary for similar transactions. The closing is scheduled for October 31, 2011.
Critical Accounting Estimates
In the ordinary course of business, we make a number of estimates and assumptions relating to the reporting of results of operations and financial position in the preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles. We believe the estimates, assumptions and judgments described in the section Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations - Critical Accounting Estimates included in our most recent Annual Report on Form 10K for the year ended December 31, 2010, have the greatest potential impact on our financial statements, so we consider these to be our critical accounting policies. These policies include our accounting for allowances for doubtful accounts, impairment of goodwill and other identifiable intangibles, income taxes and selfinsurance. These policies require us to exercise judgments that are often difficult, subjective and complex due to the necessity of estimating the effect of matters that are inherently uncertain. Actual results could differ significantly from those estimates under different assumptions and conditions. We believe the consistent application of these policies enables us to provide readers of our financial statements with useful and
reliable information about our operating results and financial condition.
Results of Operations
Our business includes three reportable segments comprised of Publications, Specialty Catalogs and Books. The Publications business segment is focused on the production of short-run journals, medium-run journals and specialty magazines and is comprised of the assets and operations of The Sheridan Press, Dartmouth Printing, Dartmouth Journal Services and United Litho. Our Books segment is focused on the production of short-run books and is comprised of the assets and operations of Sheridan Books. The Specialty Catalogs segment, which is comprised of the assets and operations of The Dingley Press, is focused on catalog merchants that require run lengths between 50,000 and 8,500,000 copies.
The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, information derived from our condensed consolidated statements of operations, the relative percentage that those amounts represent to total net sales (unless otherwise indicated), and the percentage change in those amounts from period to period. This table should be read in conjunction with the commentary that follows it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent of revenue |
| |||||
|
|
Three months ended March 31, |
|
Increase (decrease) |
|
Three months ended March 31, |
| |||||||||
(in thousands) |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
Dollars |
|
Percentage |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
| |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Net sales |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Publications |
|
$ |
36,198 |
|
$ |
37,766 |
|
$ |
(1,568 |
) |
(4.2 |
)% |
53.1 |
% |
55.3 |
% |
Specialty catalogs |
|
18,276 |
|
17,032 |
|
1,244 |
|
7.3 |
% |
26.8 |
% |
24.9 |
% | |||
Books |
|
13,793 |
|
13,502 |
|
291 |
|
2.2 |
% |
20.2 |
% |
19.8 |
% | |||
Intersegment sales elimination |
|
(78 |
) |
(2 |
) |
(76 |
) |
nm |
|
(0.1 |
)% |
|
| |||
Total net sales |
|
68,189 |
|
68,298 |
|
(109 |
) |
(0.2 |
)% |
100.0 |
% |
100.0 |
% | |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Cost of sales |
|
56,603 |
|
53,524 |
|
3,079 |
|
5.8 |
% |
83.0 |
% |
78.4 |
% | |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Gross profit |
|
11,586 |
|
14,774 |
|
(3,188 |
) |
(21.6 |
)% |
17.0 |
% |
21.6 |
% | |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Selling and administrative expenses |
|
9,956 |
|
9,383 |
|
573 |
|
6.1 |
% |
14.6 |
% |
13.7 |
% | |||
Loss on disposition of fixed assets |
|
24 |
|
33 |
|
(9 |
) |
(27.3 |
)% |
|
|
0.1 |
% | |||
Restructuring costs |
|
377 |
|
72 |
|
305 |
|
423.6 |
% |
0.6 |
% |
0.1 |
% | |||
Amortization of intangibles |
|
1,121 |
|
350 |
|
771 |
|
220.3 |
% |
1.6 |
% |
0.5 |
% | |||
Total operating expenses |
|
11,478 |
|
9,838 |
|
1,640 |
|
16.7 |
% |
16.8 |
% |
14.4 |
% | |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Operating income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Publications |
|
492 |
|
3,704 |
|
(3,212 |
) |
(86.7 |
)% |
1.4 |
% |
9.8 |
% | |||
Specialty catalogs |
|
(221 |
) |
788 |
|
(1,009 |
) |
nm |
|
(1.2 |
)% |
4.6 |
% | |||
Books |
|
691 |
|
892 |
|
(201 |
) |
(22.5 |
)% |
5.0 |
% |
6.6 |
% | |||
Corporate expenses |
|
(854 |
) |
(448 |
) |
(406 |
) |
(90.4 |
)% |
nm |
|
nm |
| |||
Total operating income |
|
108 |
|
4,936 |
|
(4,828 |
) |
(97.8 |
)% |
0.2 |
% |
7.2 |
% | |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Other (income) expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Interest expense |
|
3,930 |
|
3,949 |
|
(19 |
) |
(0.5 |
)% |
5.8 |
% |
5.8 |
% | |||
Interest income |
|
(1 |
) |
(13 |
) |
12 |
|
92.3 |
% |
|
|
|
| |||
Other, net |
|
(10 |
) |
(37 |
) |
27 |
|
(73.0 |
)% |
|
|
(0.1 |
)% | |||
Total other expense |
|
3,919 |
|
3,899 |
|
20 |
|
0.5 |
% |
5.8 |
% |
5.7 |
% | |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
(Loss) income before income taxes |
|
(3,811 |
) |
1,037 |
|
(4,848 |
) |
nm |
|
(5.6 |
)% |
1.5 |
% | |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Income tax benefit |
|
(1,448 |
) |
(509 |
) |
(939 |
) |
nm |
|
(2.1 |
)% |
(0.7 |
)% | |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Net (loss) income |
|
$ |
(2,363 |
) |
$ |
1,546 |
|
$ |
(3,909 |
) |
nm |
|
(3.5 |
)% |
2.2 |
% |
nm - not meaningful
Commentary:
Our sales for the first quarter of 2011 were virtually unchanged versus the first quarter of 2010 as the impact of higher pass through paper costs (approximately $1.0 million) were offset by pricing and volume reductions versus a year ago. Net sales for the Publications segment decreased $1.6 million or 4.2% in the first quarter of 2011 compared to the same period a year ago due primarily to: (i) sales declines in journals due to the loss of work from certain customers, pricing concessions and the continued migration to digital from offset printing, and (ii) sales declines in magazines due primarily to pricing reductions. Net sales for the Specialty Catalogs segment increased $1.2 million or 7.3% in the first quarter of 2011 compared with the same period a year ago with the majority of the increase due to increases in paper pass through costs and the
balance attributable to increased volume from new and existing customers. Net sales for the Books segment increased $0.3 million or 2.2% in the first quarter of 2011 compared with the same period a year ago due primarily to higher paper costs which were passed on to our customers.
Gross profit for the first quarter of 2011 decreased by $3.2 million or 21.6% compared to the first quarter of 2010. Gross margin of 17.0% of net sales for the first quarter of 2011 reflected a 4.6 margin point decrease versus the first quarter of 2010. The decreases in our gross profit and margin were due principally to the decline in sales, excluding pass through costs, coupled with the acceleration of depreciation expense in connection with the shutdown of ULI and higher people-related costs including healthcare claims.
Operating income of $0.1 million for the first quarter of 2011 represented a decrease of $4.8 million or 97.8% as compared to operating income of $4.9 million for the first quarter of 2010. The reduction in operating income was due primarily to the acceleration of depreciation and amortization expense as well as the restructuring costs recorded in connection with the shutdown of ULI and higher people-related costs, including healthcare claims. Additionally, the decline in sales, excluding pass through items, also contributed to the operating income reduction. Publications operating income decreased by $3.2 million in the first quarter of 2011 compared to the first quarter of 2010 due principally to the impact of lower sales, the acceleration of depreciation and amortization expense as well as the restructuring costs recorded in connection with the shutdown of ULI. Additionally increases in healthcare costs and corporate technology development cost allocations were partially offset by decreases in bad debt expense and equipment rental expense. Specialty Catalogs had an operating loss of $0.2 million in the first quarter of 2011 as compared to operating income of $0.8 million in the first quarter of 2010, a decrease of $1.0 million. This decrease was primarily due to higher people-related costs as well as increases in supplies and materials. Operating income for the Books segment decreased $0.2 million in the first quarter of 2011 compared with the same period last year due principally to slightly lower sales, excluding pass through costs, and increased corporate technology development cost allocations. An increase in corporate expenses decreased operating income by $0.4 million in the first quarter of 2011 as compared with the same period last year due primarily to an increase in the management fee paid to our principal equity sponsors coupled with certain non-capitalizable legal fees incurred in connection with negotiations to refinance our debt.
The loss before income taxes of $3.8 million for the first quarter of 2011 represented a $4.8 million decrease as compared to the same period last year. The decrease was due primarily to the higher expenses mentioned previously.
We recorded income tax benefit during the three months ended March 31, 2011 based on an estimated effective income tax rate of approximately 40%, which was partially offset by discrete adjustments resulting in an effective tax rate of approximately 38%. We recorded income tax expense during the three months ended March 31, 2010 based on an estimated effective income tax rate of approximately 27%. Certain adjustments for items discrete to the three months ended March 31, 2010 were recognized which exceeded the tax expense recorded during the period, resulting in a net income tax benefit of approximately $0.5 million. The most significant discrete item was a change in the apportionment rules which resulted in a decrease in the income taxes we pay to the State of Maine.
Net loss of $2.4 million for the first quarter of 2011 represented a $3.9 million decrease as compared to net income of $1.5 million for the first quarter of 2010 due to the factors mentioned previously.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
As further described below under Indebtedness, on April 15, 2011, we completed the 2011 Notes offering and entered into an agreement to amend and restate our working capital facility. Proceeds of the 2011 Notes offering of $141.0 million, net of discount, together with cash on hand and borrowings under our working capital facility, were used to repurchase all of our existing 2003 Notes and 2004 Notes (due in 2011) and to pay related fees and expenses.
Our principal sources of liquidity are expected to be cash flow generated from operations and borrowings under our working capital facility. Our principal uses of cash are expected to be to meet debt service requirements, finance our capital expenditures and provide working capital. We estimate that our capital expenditures for the remainder of 2011will total about $7.3 million. Based on our current level of operations, we believe that our cash flow from operations, available cash and available borrowings under our working capital facility will be adequate to meet our future short-term and long-term liquidity needs.
We had cash of $5.3 million as of March 31, 2011 compared to $13.7 million as of December 31, 2010. During the first three months of 2011, we utilized cash on hand to fund operations, make investments in new plant and equipment and make the semi-annual interest payments on the senior secured notes.
Operating Activities
Net cash used in operating activities was $0.6 million for the first three months of 2011 compared to cash provided by operating activities of $1.5 million for the first three months of 2010. This $2.1 million decrease was primarily due to a decrease in net income of $3.9 million which was partially offset by net non-cash expenses of $2.2 million coupled with unfavorable changes in working capital and other assets and liabilities that totaled $0.4 million. The major working capital changes included:
· an unfavorable change of $2.1 million from accounts receivable due primarily to the timing of sales during the first quarter of 2011 as compared to the fourth quarter of 2010;
· a favorable change of $1.7 million from accrued expenses due primarily to the timing of payments for payroll and customer incentives.
Investing Activities
Net cash used in investing activities was $7.8 million for the first three months of 2011 compared to $1.1 million for the first three months of 2010. This $6.7 million increase in cash used was primarily the result of $6.6 million of higher capital spending in the first quarter of 2011 as compared to the same period last year due primarily to the expansion of Dartmouth Printing Company as part of the United Litho consolidation plan.
Indebtedness
2011 Notes and Amended and Restated Working Capital Facility
On April 15, 2011, we completed the offering of the 2011 Notes pursuant to an indenture, by and among the Company, the subsidiaries of the Company named on the signature pages thereto, as guarantors, and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as trustee (the Indenture). The 2011 Notes will mature on April 15, 2014 and bear interest payable in cash in arrears at the fixed interest rate of 12.5% per year. Interest on the 2011 Notes will be payable semi-annually on April 15 and October 15 of each year, commencing on October 15, 2011. The 2011 Notes are fully and unconditionally guaranteed on a senior secured basis by all of our current subsidiaries.
The Indenture requires that we maintain certain minimum Consolidated EBITDA levels (as discussed further below) for any period of four consecutive fiscal quarters, taken as one accounting period, and prohibits us from making capital expenditures in amounts exceeding certain thresholds for the period beginning on April 15, 2011 and ending on December 31, 2011 and for each fiscal year thereafter. In addition, the Indenture contains covenants that, subject to a number of important exceptions and qualifications, limit our ability and the ability of our restricted subsidiaries to, among other things: pay dividends, redeem stock or make other distributions or restricted payments; incur indebtedness; make certain investments; create liens; agree to restrictions on the payment of dividends; consolidate or merge; sell or otherwise transfer or dispose of assets, including equity interests of our restricted subsidiaries; enter into transactions with our affiliates; designate our subsidiaries as unrestricted subsidiaries; use the proceeds of permitted sales of our assets; and change business lines. If an event of default, as specified in the Indenture, shall occur and be continuing, either the trustee or the holders of a specified percentage of the 2011 Notes may accelerate the maturity of all the 2011 Notes.
On April 15, 2011, we entered into an agreement to amend and restate our working capital facility to, among other things, extend the scheduled maturity to April 15, 2013. Terms of the amended and restated working capital facility allow for revolving debt of up to $15.0 million, including letters of credit commitments of up to $5.0 million, subject to a borrowing base test. The interest rate on borrowings under the working capital facility is the base rate plus a margin of 3.25%. The base rate is a fluctuating rate equal to the highest of (a) the Federal Funds Rate plus 0.50%, (b) the banks prime rate, and (c) the specified LIBOR rate plus 1.00%. At our option, we can elect for borrowings to bear interest for specified periods at the specified LIBOR rate in effect for such periods plus a margin of 4.25%. We have agreed to pay an annual commitment fee on the unused portion of the working capital facility at a rate of 0.75% and an annual fee of 4.25% on all letters of credit outstanding. In addition, we paid an upfront fee of $0.3 million at closing.
Both the 2011 Notes and the related guarantees and our and the guarantors obligations under the working capital facility are secured by a lien in substantially all of our and the guarantors assets. Pursuant to an intercreditor agreement between the trustee under the Indenture and the lender under the working capital facility, (1) in the case of real property, fixtures and equipment that secure the 2011 Notes and guarantees, the lien securing the notes and the guarantees will be senior to the lien securing borrowings, other credit extensions and guarantees under the working capital facility and (2) in the case of the other assets of the Company and the guarantors (including the shares of stock of the Company and the guarantors) that secure the 2011 Notes and guarantees, the lien securing the 2011 Notes and the related guarantees is contractually subordinated to the lien thereon securing borrowings, other credit extensions and guarantees under the working capital facility. Consequently, the 2011 Notes and the related guarantees are effectively subordinated to the borrowings, other credit extensions and guarantees under the working capital facility to the extent of the value of such other assets.
Proceeds of the 2011 Notes offering of $141.0 million, net of discount, together with cash on hand and borrowings under the working capital facility were used to repurchase all of our existing 2003 Notes and 2004 Notes (due in 2011) and to pay related fees and expenses. We have significant interest payments due on the 2011 Notes as well as interest payments due on borrowings under our working capital facility. Total cash interest payments related to our working capital facility and the 2011 Notes are expected to be in excess of $18.7 million on an annual basis.
Each of the Indenture and the working capital facility agreement requires that we maintain certain minimum consolidated EBITDA amounts for any period of four consecutive quarters, taken as one accounting period, as follows:
Period |
|
Amount |
April 15, 2011 to March 31, 2012 |
|
$32.00 million |
April 1, 2012 to March 31, 2012 |
|
$34.00 million |
April 1, 2013 and thereafter |
|
$35.00 million |
Consolidated EBITDA has the same meaning under each of the Indenture and the working capital facility agreement and generally consists of net income (loss) before interest expense, income taxes, depreciation, amortization, restructuring charges and certain other non-cash items. Pursuant to the Indenture and the working capital facility agreement, Consolidated EBITDA for the period of four consecutive fiscal quarters ended (i) March 31, 2011 will be deemed to equal our Consolidated EBITDA for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2011 plus $28,869,000, (ii) June 30, 2011 will be deemed to equal our consolidated EBITDA for the two consecutive fiscal quarters ended June 30, 2011 plus $18,896,000 and (iii) September 30, 2011 will be deemed to equal our consolidated EBITDA for the three consecutive fiscal quarters ended September 30, 2011 plus $9,485,000. Failure to satisfy the minimum consolidated EBITDA amounts will constitute a default under each of the Indenture and the working capital facility agreement. For the twelve months ended March 31, 2011, our consolidated EBITDA was $36.8 million.
Consolidated EBITDA is used for purposes of calculating our compliance with the minimum consolidated EBITDA covenants in each of the Indenture and the working capital facility agreement and to evaluate our operating performance and determine management incentive payments. Consolidated EBITDA is not an indicator of financial performance or liquidity under generally accepted accounting principles and may not be comparable to similarly captioned information reported by other companies. In addition, it should not be considered as an alternative to, or more meaningful than, income before income taxes, cash flows from operating activities or other traditional indicators of operating performance.
The following table provides a reconciliation of Consolidated EBITDA to cash flows from operating activities for the three month period ended March 31, 2011 (in thousands). The Consolidated EBITDA covenants under each of the Indenture and the working capital facility agreement are based upon a rolling twelve months. Therefore, Consolidated EBITDA for the twelve months ended March 31, 2011 includes the amounts presented in the following table as well as an assumed amount of $28,869,000 as required under the terms of each of the Indenture and the working capital facility agreement (as described above).
|
|
Three Months |
| |
|
|
Ended |
| |
|
|
March 31, |
| |
|
|
2011 |
| |
|
|
|
| |
Net cash used in operating activities |
|
$ |
(613 |
) |
|
|
|
| |
Accounts receivable |
|
2,248 |
| |
Inventories |
|
128 |
| |
Other current assets |
|
(959 |
) | |
Other assets |
|
(369 |
) | |
Accounts payable |
|
496 |
| |
Accrued expenses |
|
2,015 |
| |
Due to parent, net |
|
1,064 |
| |
Other liabilities |
|
502 |
| |
Provision for doubtful accounts |
|
(184 |
) | |
Deferred income tax benefit |
|
399 |
| |
Provision for inventory realizability and LIFO value |
|
(26 |
) | |
Loss on disposition of fixed assets, net |
|
(24 |
) | |
Income tax benefit |
|
(1,448 |
) | |
Cash interest expense |
|
3,702 |
| |
Management fees |
|
491 |
| |
Non cash adjustments: |
|
|
| |
Increase in market value of investments |
|
(3 |
) | |
Amortization of prepaid lease costs |
|
|
| |
Loss on disposition of fixed assets |
|
31 |
| |
Restructuring costs |
|
377 |
| |
Non capitalizable debt costs |
|
101 |
| |
|
|
|
| |
Consolidated EBITDA |
|
$ |
7,928 |
|
Contractual Obligations
As described above under Indebtedness, in April 2011, we repurchased and redeemed the 2003 Notes and 2004 Notes utilizing proceeds of the offering of the 2011 Notes, cash on hand and borrowings under our working capital facility. As of April 30, 2011, we had borrowings under the working capital facility of approximately $3.7 million.
Off Balance Sheet Arrangements
At March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, we did not have any relationships with unconsolidated entities or financial partnerships, such as entities often referred to as structured finance or special purpose entities, which would have been established for the purpose of facilitating offbalance sheet arrangements or other contractually narrow or limited purposes. We therefore are not materially exposed to any financing, liquidity, market or credit risk that could arise if we had engaged in such relationships.
New Accounting Standards
In December 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-29, an amendment to the disclosure of supplementary pro forma information for business combinations (EITF Issue 10-G; ASC 805, Business Combinations). This amendment specified that if a public entity presents comparative financial statements, the entity should disclose revenue and earnings of the combined entity as though the business combination(s) that occurred during the current year had occurred as of the beginning of the comparable prior annual reporting period only. The amendment also expanded the supplemental pro forma disclosures under ASC 805 to include a description of the nature and amount of material, nonrecurring pro forma adjustments directly attributable to the business combination included in the reported pro forma revenue and earnings. This is effective prospectively for business combinations for which the acquisition date is on or after the beginning of the first annual reporting period beginning on or after December 15, 2010. Early adoption is permitted. The adoption of this amendment did not have an impact on our financial statements.
In December 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-28, an amendment to the goodwill impairment test for reporting units with zero or negative carrying amounts (EITF Issue 10-A; ASC 350, Intangibles-Goodwill and Other). The amendment affects all entities that have recognized goodwill and have one or more reporting units whose carrying amount for purposes of performing Step 1 of the goodwill impairment test is zero or negative. As a result, the amendment eliminates an entitys ability to assert that a reporting unit
is not required to perform Step 2 because the carrying amount of the reporting unit is zero or negative despite the existence of qualitative factors that indicate the goodwill is more likely than not impaired. For public entities, the amendment is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2010. Early adoption is not permitted. Upon adoption of the amendments, an entity with reporting units that have carrying amounts that are zero or negative is required to assess whether it is more likely than not that the reporting units goodwill is impaired. If the entity determines that it is more likely than not that the goodwill of one or more of its reporting units is impaired, the entity should perform Step 2 of the goodwill impairment test for those reporting unit(s). Any resulting goodwill impairment should be recorded as a cumulative-effect adjustment to beginning retained earnings in the period of adoption. Any goodwill impairments occurring after the initial adoption of the amendments should be included in earnings as required by Section 350-20-35. The adoption of this amendment did not have an impact on our financial statements.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
Market risk represents the risk of changes in value of a financial instrument, derivative or nonderivative, caused by fluctuations in interest rates, foreign exchange rates and equity prices. Changes in these factors could cause fluctuations in results of our operations and cash flows. In the ordinary course of business, we are exposed to foreign currency and interest rate risks. These risks primarily relate to the purchase of products and services from foreign suppliers and changes in interest rates on our longterm debt.
Foreign Exchange Rate Market Risk
We consider the U.S. dollar to be the functional currency for all of our entities. All of our net sales and virtually all of our expenses in the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010 were denominated in U.S. dollars. Therefore, foreign currency fluctuations had a negligible impact on our financial results in those periods.
Interest Rate Market Risk
We are exposed to changes in interest rates because our working capital facility is variable rate debt. Interest rate changes generally do not affect the market value of such debt but do impact the amount of our interest payments and, therefore, our future earnings and cash flows, assuming other factors are held constant. While we did not have any borrowings under our working capital facility during the first three months of 2011, in April 2011 we utilized borrowings under our working capital facility to fund the repurchase and redemption of the 2003 Notes and 2004 Notes. As of April 30, 2011, we had borrowings under the working capital facility of approximately $3.7 million. All of our other debt carries fixed interest rates.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
As of the end of the period covered by this report, we conducted an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our principal executive officer (CEO) and principal financial officer (CFO), of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a15(e) and 15d15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Exchange Act)). Based on this evaluation, the CEO and CFO concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are effective to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed by us in reports we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the rules and forms of the Securities and Exchange Commission and that information required to be disclosed in the reports we file or submit under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to our management, including the CEO and CFO, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures.
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
There was no change in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by this report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
From time to time, we are party to various legal actions in the ordinary course of our business. In our opinion, these matters are not expected to have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations.
In addition to the other information set forth in this report, you should carefully consider the factors discussed in Part I, Item 1A. Risk Factors in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010, which could materially affect our business, financial condition or future results. The risks described in our Annual Report on Form 10-K are not the only risks
facing us. Additional risk and uncertainties not currently known to us or that we currently deem to be immaterial also may materially adversely affect our business, financial condition or operating results.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
None.
Item 3. Defaults upon Senior Securities
None.
None.
None.
Exhibits |
|
|
|
|
|
10.57.a |
|
Contract of Sale by and between United Litho, Inc. and Beaumeade Development Partners LLC, dated as of February 3, 2011, relating to the sale of the facility in Ashburn, VA. |
10.57.b |
|
First Amendment to Contract of Sale by and between United Litho, Inc. and Beaumeade Development Partners LLC, dated as of April 19, 2011, relating to the sale of the facility in Ashburn, VA. |
31.1 |
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a14(a) or 15d14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the SarbanesOxley Act of 2002. |
31.2 |
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a14(a) or 15d14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the SarbanesOxley Act of 2002. |
32.1 |
|
Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the SarbanesOxley Act of 2002, executed by John A. Saxton, President and Chief Executive Officer of The Sheridan Group, Inc. and Robert M. Jakobe, Chief Financial Officer of The Sheridan Group, Inc. |
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
The Sheridan Group, Inc. | |||
|
Registrant | |||
|
|
| ||
|
|
| ||
|
By: |
/s/ Robert M. Jakobe | ||
|
|
Robert M. Jakobe | ||
|
|
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer | ||
|
|
| ||
Date: |
May 13, 2011 |
|
|
|