Attached files

file filename
EX-32 - EX-32 - ALLSTATE LIFE INSURANCE COa11-9290_1ex32.htm
EX-15 - EX-15 - ALLSTATE LIFE INSURANCE COa11-9290_1ex15.htm
EX-10.2 - EX-10.2 - ALLSTATE LIFE INSURANCE COa11-9290_1ex10d2.htm
EX-31.I - EX-31.I - ALLSTATE LIFE INSURANCE COa11-9290_1ex31di.htm
EX-10.1 - EX-10.1 - ALLSTATE LIFE INSURANCE COa11-9290_1ex10d1.htm

 

 

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

 

FORM 10-Q

 

The Registrant meets the conditions set forth in General Instruction H (1)(a) and (b) of Form 10-Q and is therefore filing this Form with the reduced disclosure format.

 

x        QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF

THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2011

 

OR

 

o        TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

For the transition period from _____ to _____

 

Commission file number: 000-31248

 

ALLSTATE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

 

Illinois

 

36-2554642

(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)

 

(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

 

3100 Sanders Road, Northbrook, Illinois  60062

(Address of principal executive offices)  (Zip code)

 

(847) 402-5000

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

 

Yes  x     No  o

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).

 

Yes  o     No  o

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company.  See definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

 

Large accelerated filer o

 

Accelerated filer o

 

 

 

Non-accelerated filer x  (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

 

Smaller reporting company o

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

 

Yes  o     No  x

 

As of May 4, 2011, the registrant had 23,800 common shares, $227 par value, outstanding, all of which are held by Allstate Insurance Company.

 

 

 



 

ALLSTATE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY

INDEX TO QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q

March 31, 2011

 

 

 

PAGE

PART I

FINANCIAL INFORMATION

 

 

 

 

Item 1.

Financial Statements

 

 

 

 

 

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Three-Month Periods Ended March 31, 2011 and 2010 (unaudited)

1

 

 

 

 

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Financial Position as of March 31, 2011 (unaudited) and December 31, 2010

2

 

 

 

 

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Three-Month Periods Ended March 31, 2011 and 2010 (unaudited)

3

 

 

 

 

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)

4

 

 

 

 

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

38

 

 

 

Item 2.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

 

 

 

 

 

Operations Highlights

39

 

Operations

39

 

Investments Highlights

45

 

Investments

45

 

Capital Resources and Liquidity

65

 

 

 

Item 4.

Controls and Procedures

68

 

 

 

PART II

OTHER INFORMATION

 

 

 

 

Item 1.

Legal Proceedings

69

 

 

 

Item 1A.

Risk Factors

69

 

 

 

Item 6.

Exhibits

69

 



 

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

 

ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

ALLSTATE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

 

 

 

Three months ended
March 31,

 

($ in millions)

 

2011

 

2010

 

 

 

(unaudited)

 

Revenues

 

 

 

 

 

Premiums

 

$

171

 

$

153

 

Contract charges

 

247

 

246

 

Net investment income

 

662

 

707

 

Realized capital gains and losses:

 

 

 

 

 

Total other-than-temporary impairment losses

 

(82

)

(179

)

Portion of loss recognized in other comprehensive income

 

(7

)

14

 

Net other-than-temporary impairment losses recognized in earnings

 

(89

)

(165

)

Sales and other realized capital gains and losses

 

134

 

4

 

Total realized capital gains and losses

 

45

 

(161

)

 

 

1,125

 

945

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Costs and expenses

 

 

 

 

 

Contract benefits

 

382

 

364

 

Interest credited to contractholder funds

 

408

 

452

 

Amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs

 

124

 

67

 

Operating costs and expenses

 

77

 

86

 

Restructuring and related charges

 

(2

)

 

Interest expense

 

11

 

11

 

 

 

1,000

 

980

 

Gain on disposition of operations

 

2

 

1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Income (loss) from operations before income tax expense (benefit)

 

127

 

(34

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Income tax expense (benefit)

 

40

 

(16

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income (loss)

 

$

87

 

$

(18

)

 

See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

 

1



 

ALLSTATE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES

 

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF FINANCIAL POSITION

 

 

 

 

March 31,

 

December 31,

 

($ in millions, except par value data)

 

2011

 

2010

 

 

 

(unaudited)

 

 

 

Assets

 

 

 

 

 

Investments

 

 

 

 

 

Fixed income securities, at fair value (amortized cost $46,753 and $47,486)

 

$

47,629

 

$

48,214

 

Mortgage loans

 

6,461

 

6,553

 

Equity securities, at fair value (cost $154 and $164)

 

213

 

211

 

Limited partnership interests

 

1,357

 

1,272

 

Short-term, at fair value (amortized cost $822 and $1,257)

 

822

 

1,257

 

Policy loans

 

839

 

841

 

Other

 

1,186

 

1,094

 

Total investments

 

58,507

 

59,442

 

Cash

 

138

 

118

 

Deferred policy acquisition costs

 

2,931

 

2,982

 

Reinsurance recoverables

 

4,253

 

4,277

 

Accrued investment income

 

566

 

522

 

Other assets

 

633

 

420

 

Separate Accounts

 

8,603

 

8,676

 

Total assets

 

$

75,631

 

$

76,437

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Liabilities

 

 

 

 

 

Contractholder funds

 

$

45,148

 

$

46,458

 

Reserve for life-contingent contract benefits

 

12,815

 

12,752

 

Unearned premiums

 

25

 

27

 

Payable to affiliates, net

 

106

 

118

 

Other liabilities and accrued expenses

 

1,635

 

1,454

 

Deferred income taxes

 

769

 

643

 

Notes due to related parties

 

686

 

677

 

Separate Accounts

 

8,603

 

8,676

 

Total liabilities

 

69,787

 

70,805

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Commitments and Contingent Liabilities (Note 8)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Shareholder’s Equity

 

 

 

 

 

Redeemable preferred stock - series A, $100 par value, 1,500,000 shares authorized, none issued

 

 

 

Redeemable preferred stock - series B, $100 par value, 1,500,000 shares authorized, none issued

 

 

 

Common stock, $227 par value, 23,800 shares authorized and outstanding

 

5

 

5

 

Additional capital paid-in

 

3,189

 

3,189

 

Retained income

 

2,000

 

1,913

 

Accumulated other comprehensive income:

 

 

 

 

 

Unrealized net capital gains and losses:

 

 

 

 

 

Unrealized net capital losses on fixed income securities with OTTI

 

(103

)

(100

)

Other unrealized net capital gains and losses

 

691

 

587

 

Unrealized adjustment to DAC, DSI and insurance reserves

 

62

 

38

 

Total unrealized net capital gains and losses

 

650

 

525

 

Total accumulated other comprehensive income

 

650

 

525

 

Total shareholder’s equity

 

5,844

 

5,632

 

Total liabilities and shareholder’s equity

 

$

75,631

 

$

76,437

 

 

See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

 

2



 

ALLSTATE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES

 

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

 

 

 

Three months ended

 

 

 

March 31,

 

($ in millions)

 

2011

 

2010

 

 

 

(unaudited)

 

Cash flows from operating activities

 

 

 

 

 

Net income (loss)

 

$

87

 

$

(18

)

Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by operating activities:

 

 

 

 

 

Amortization and other non-cash items

 

(31

)

(41

)

Realized capital gains and losses

 

(45

)

161

 

Gain on disposition of operations

 

(2

)

(1

)

Interest credited to contractholder funds

 

408

 

452

 

Changes in:

 

 

 

 

 

Policy benefits and other insurance reserves

 

(133

)

(98

)

Unearned premiums

 

(2

)

(1

)

Deferred policy acquisition costs

 

48

 

(21

)

Reinsurance recoverables, net

 

(59

)

(81

)

Income taxes

 

42

 

490

 

Other operating assets and liabilities

 

(56

)

(37

)

Net cash provided by operating activities

 

257

 

805

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash flows from investing activities

 

 

 

 

 

Proceeds from sales

 

 

 

 

 

Fixed income securities

 

2,959

 

2,666

 

Equity securities

 

9

 

3

 

Limited partnership interests

 

39

 

34

 

Mortgage loans

 

26

 

3

 

Other investments

 

60

 

33

 

Investment collections

 

 

 

 

 

Fixed income securities

 

681

 

616

 

Mortgage loans

 

86

 

260

 

Other investments

 

55

 

13

 

Investment purchases

 

 

 

 

 

Fixed income securities

 

(2,961

)

(3,152

)

Equity securities

 

(8

)

 

Limited partnership interests

 

(115

)

(43

)

Mortgage loans

 

(26

)

(1

)

Other investments

 

(57

)

(41

)

Change in short-term investments, net

 

577

 

487

 

Change in other investments, net

 

(165

)

7

 

Net cash provided by investing activities

 

1,160

 

885

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash flows from financing activities

 

 

 

 

 

Contractholder fund deposits

 

472

 

672

 

Contractholder fund withdrawals

 

(1,869

)

(2,337

)

Net cash used in financing activities

 

(1,397

)

(1,665

)

Net increase in cash

 

20

 

25

 

Cash at beginning of period

 

118

 

145

 

Cash at end of period

 

$

138

 

$

170

 

 

See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

 

3



 

ALLSTATE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

 

1.   General

 

Basis of presentation

 

The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Allstate Life Insurance Company (“ALIC”) and its wholly owned subsidiaries (collectively referred to as the “Company”).  ALIC is wholly owned by Allstate Insurance Company (“AIC”), which is wholly owned by Allstate Insurance Holdings, LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of The Allstate Corporation (the “Corporation”).

 

The condensed consolidated financial statements and notes as of March 31, 2011, and for the three-month periods ended March 31, 2011 and 2010 are unaudited.  The condensed consolidated financial statements reflect all adjustments (consisting only of normal recurring accruals), which are, in the opinion of management, necessary for the fair presentation of the financial position, results of operations and cash flows for the interim periods.  These condensed consolidated financial statements and notes should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010.  The results of operations for the interim periods should not be considered indicative of results to be expected for the full year.

 

To conform to the current year presentation, certain amounts in the prior year condensed consolidated financial statements and notes have been reclassified.

 

Premiums and contract charges

 

The following table summarizes premiums and contract charges by product for the three months ended March 31.

 

($ in millions)

 

2011

 

2010

 

Premiums

 

 

 

 

 

Traditional life insurance

 

$

104

 

$

102

 

Immediate annuities with life contingencies

 

43

 

27

 

Accident and health insurance

 

24

 

24

 

Total premiums

 

171

 

153

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Contract charges

 

 

 

 

 

Interest-sensitive life insurance

 

238

 

233

 

Fixed annuities

 

9

 

13

 

Total contract charges

 

247

 

246

 

Total premiums and contract charges

 

$

418

 

$

399

 

 

Adopted accounting standards

 

Consolidation Analysis Considering Investments Held through Separate Accounts

 

In April 2010, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued guidance clarifying that an insurer is not required to combine interests in investments held in a qualifying separate account with its interests in the same investments held in the general account when performing a consolidation evaluation.  The adoption of this guidance as of January 1, 2011 had no impact on the Company’s results of operations or financial position.

 

Disclosure of Supplementary Pro Forma Information for Business Combinations

 

In December 2010, the FASB issued disclosure guidance for entities that enter into business combinations that are material.  The guidance specifies that if an entity presents comparative financial statements, the entity should disclose proforma revenue and earnings of the combined entity as though the business combination that occurred during the current year had occurred as of the beginning of the comparable prior annual reporting period only.  The guidance expands the supplemental pro forma disclosures to include a description of the nature and amount of material, nonrecurring pro forma adjustments directly attributable to the business combination.  The Company will apply the guidance to any business combinations entered into on or after January 1, 2011.

 

4



 

ALLSTATE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

 

Pending accounting standards

 

Accounting for Costs Associated with Acquiring or Renewing Insurance Contracts

 

In October 2010, the FASB issued guidance modifying the definition of the types of costs incurred by insurance entities that can be capitalized in the acquisition of new and renewal contracts.  The guidance specifies that the costs must be based on successful efforts.  The guidance also specifies that advertising costs should be included as deferred acquisition costs only when the direct-response advertising accounting criteria are met.  If application of the guidance would result in the capitalization of acquisition costs that had not been capitalized prior to adoption, the entity may elect not to capitalize those additional costs.  The new guidance is effective for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2011 and should be applied prospectively, with retrospective application permitted.  The Company is in the process of evaluating the impact of adoption on the Company’s results of operations and financial position.

 

Criteria for Classification as a Troubled Debt Restructuring (“TDR”)

 

In April 2011, the FASB issued clarifying guidance related to determining whether a loan modification or restructuring should be classified as a TDR.  The additional guidance provided pertains to the two criteria used to determine whether a TDR exists, specifically whether the creditor has granted a concession and whether the debtor is experiencing financial difficulties.  The new guidance is effective for reporting periods beginning on or after June 15, 2011 with early adoption permitted.  The guidance related to the identification of a TDR is to be applied retrospectively to the beginning of the annual period of adoption.  The measurement of impairment on a TDR identified under this guidance is effective prospectively.  Disclosures about the credit quality of financing receivables and the allowance for credit losses previously deferred for TDRs, is also effective for reporting periods beginning on or after June 15, 2011.  The Company is in the process of evaluating the impact of adoption, which is not expected to be material to the Company’s results of operations and financial position.

 

2.  Related Party Transactions

 

In March 2011, Road Bay Investments, LLC (“RBI”), a consolidated subsidiary of ALIC, entered into an asset purchase agreement with AIC, which allows RBI to purchase from AIC mortgage loans, participations in mortgage loans, bonds, or real estate acquired in connection with such loans, with an aggregate fair value of up to $25 million.  As consideration for the purchase of the assets, RBI issues notes to AIC.  In March 2011, RBI purchased from AIC real estate with a fair value of $10 million on the date of sale and issued a 5.75% note due March 24, 2018 to AIC for the same amount.  Since the transaction was between affiliates under common control, the real estate was recorded by RBI at AIC’s carrying value on the date of sale.  The real estate that was purchased was impaired; therefore, the carrying value on the date of sale equaled fair value.

 

3.  Supplemental Cash Flow Information

 

Non-cash investment exchanges, including modifications of certain mortgage loans (primarily refinances at maturity with no concessions granted to the borrower), fixed income securities, limited partnerships and other investments, as well as mergers completed with equity securities, totaled $49 million and $37 million for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively.

 

5



 

ALLSTATE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

 

Liabilities for collateral received in conjunction with the Company’s securities lending program and over-the-counter (“OTC”) derivatives are reported in other liabilities and accrued expenses or other investments.  The accompanying cash flows are included in cash flows from operating activities in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows along with the activities resulting from management of the proceeds, which for the three months ended March 31 are as follows:

 

($ in millions)

 

2011

 

2010

 

Net change in proceeds managed

 

 

 

 

 

Net change in short-term investments

 

$

(137

)

$

149

 

Operating cash flow (used) provided

 

$

(137

)

$

149

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net change in liabilities

 

 

 

 

 

Liabilities for collateral, beginning of year

 

$

(465

)

$

(617

)

Liabilities for collateral, end of period

 

(602

)

(468

)

Operating cash flow provided (used)

 

$

137

 

$

(149

)

 

4.             Investments

 

Fair values

 

The amortized cost, gross unrealized gains and losses and fair value for fixed income securities are as follows:

 

 

 

Amortized

 

Gross unrealized

 

Fair

 

($ in millions)

 

cost

 

Gains

 

Losses

 

value

 

March 31, 2011

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

U.S. government and agencies

 

$

2,310

 

$

213

 

$

(6

)

$

2,517

 

Municipal

 

4,888

 

95

 

(265

)

4,718

 

Corporate

 

28,755

 

1,418

 

(316

)

29,857

 

Foreign government

 

1,920

 

275

 

(9

)

2,186

 

Residential mortgage-backed securities (“RMBS”)

 

4,166

 

122

 

(360

)

3,928

 

Commercial mortgage-backed securities (“CMBS”)

 

2,060

 

60

 

(165

)

1,955

 

Asset-backed securities (“ABS”)

 

2,639

 

59

 

(245

)

2,453

 

Redeemable preferred stock

 

15

 

 

 

15

 

Total fixed income securities

 

$

46,753

 

$

2,242

 

$

(1,366

)

$

47,629

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

December 31, 2010

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

U.S. government and agencies

 

$

3,258

 

$

245

 

$

(9

)

$

3,494

 

Municipal

 

5,179

 

88

 

(294

)

4,973

 

Corporate

 

27,509

 

1,510

 

(369

)

28,650

 

Foreign government

 

1,962

 

303

 

(8

)

2,257

 

RMBS

 

4,674

 

132

 

(451

)

4,355

 

CMBS

 

2,121

 

56

 

(274

)

1,903

 

ABS

 

2,768

 

88

 

(289

)

2,567

 

Redeemable preferred stock

 

15

 

 

 

15

 

Total fixed income securities

 

$

47,486

 

$

2,422

 

$

(1,694

)

$

48,214

 

 

6



 

ALLSTATE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

 

Scheduled maturities

 

The scheduled maturities for fixed income securities are as follows as of March 31, 2011:

 

($ in millions) 

 

Amortized
cost

 

Fair
value

 

Due in one year or less

 

$

1,716

 

$

1,748

 

Due after one year through five years

 

12,629

 

13,189

 

Due after five years through ten years

 

12,223

 

12,948

 

Due after ten years

 

13,380

 

13,363

 

 

 

39,948

 

41,248

 

RMBS and ABS

 

6,805

 

6,381

 

Total

 

$

46,753

 

$

47,629

 

 

Actual maturities may differ from those scheduled as a result of prepayments by the issuers.  Because of the potential for prepayment on RMBS and ABS, they are not categorized by contractual maturity.  CMBS are categorized by contractual maturity because they generally are not subject to prepayment risk.

 

Net investment income

 

Net investment income for the three months ended March 31 is as follows:

 

($ in millions)

 

2011

 

2010

 

Fixed income securities

 

$

591

 

$

635

 

Mortgage loans

 

88

 

101

 

Equity securities

 

1

 

1

 

Limited partnership interests

 

5

 

3

 

Short-term investments

 

1

 

1

 

Other

 

3

 

(8

)

Investment income, before expense

 

689

 

733

 

Investment expense

 

(27

)

(26

)

Net investment income

 

$

662

 

$

707

 

 

Realized capital gains and losses

 

Realized capital gains and losses by asset type for the three months ended March 31 are as follows:

 

($ in millions)

 

2011

 

2010

 

Fixed income securities

 

$

17

 

$

(91

)

Mortgage loans

 

(2

)

(25

)

Equity securities

 

(2

)

 

Limited partnership interests

 

22

 

(15

)

Derivatives

 

4

 

(35

)

Other

 

6

 

5

 

Realized capital gains and losses

 

$

45

 

$

(161

)

 

Realized capital gains and losses by transaction type for the three months ended March 31 are as follows:

 

($ in millions)

 

2011

 

2010

 

Impairment write-downs

 

$

(47

)

$

(142

)

Change in intent write-downs

 

(42

)

(23

)

Net other-than-temporary impairment losses recognized in earnings

 

(89

)

(165

)

Sales

 

112

 

43

 

Valuation of derivative instruments

 

(2

)

(54

)

Settlements of derivative instruments

 

6

 

19

 

Equity method of accounting (“EMA”) limited partnership income

 

18

 

(4

)

Realized capital gains and losses

 

$

45

 

$

(161

)

 

7



 

ALLSTATE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

 

Gross gains of $126 million and $95 million and gross losses of $31 million and $49 million were realized on sales of fixed income securities during the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively.

 

Other-than-temporary impairment losses by asset type for the three months ended March 31 are as follows:

 

 

 

2011

 

2010

 

($ in millions)

 

Gross

 

Included
in OCI

 

Net

 

Gross

 

Included
in OCI

 

Net

 

Fixed income securities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Municipal

 

$

(12

)

$

(1

)

$

(13

)

$

(20

)

$

 

$

(20

)

Corporate

 

(4

)

1

 

(3

)

(40

)

2

 

(38

)

RMBS

 

(36

)

(5

)

(41

)

(60

)

13

 

(47

)

CMBS

 

(16

)

(4

)

(20

)

(26

)

 

(26

)

ABS

 

(6

)

2

 

(4

)

(3

)

(1

)

(4

)

Total fixed income securities

 

(74

)

(7

)

(81

)

(149

)

14

 

(135

)

Equity securities

 

(5

)

 

(5

)

 

 

 

Mortgage loans

 

(2

)

 

(2

)

(19

)

 

(19

)

Limited partnership interests

 

 

 

 

(11

)

 

(11

)

Other

 

(1

)

 

(1

)

 

 

 

Other-than-temporary impairment losses

 

$

(82

)

$

(7

)

$

(89

)

$

(179

)

$

14

 

$

(165

)

 

The total amount of other-than-temporary impairment losses included in accumulated other comprehensive income at the time of impairment for fixed income securities, which were not included in earnings, are presented in the following table.  The amount excludes $161 million and $213 million as of March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively, of net unrealized gains related to changes in valuation of the fixed income securities subsequent to the impairment measurement date.

 

($ in millions)

 

March 31,
2011

 

December 31,
2010

 

Municipal

 

$

(7

)

$

(17

)

Corporate

 

(2

)

(1

)

RMBS

 

(243

)

(258

)

CMBS

 

(42

)

(49

)

ABS

 

(26

)

(41

)

Total

 

$

(320

)

$

(366

)

 

Rollforwards of the cumulative credit losses recognized in earnings for fixed income securities held as of March 31 are as follows:

 

 

 

Three months ended
March 31

 

($ in millions)

 

2011

 

2010

 

Beginning balance

 

$

(701

)

$

(808

)

Additional credit loss for securities previously other-than-temporarily impaired

 

(19

)

(67

)

Additional credit loss for securities not previously other-than-temporarily impaired

 

(19

)

(51

)

Reduction in credit loss for securities disposed or collected

 

132

 

93

 

Reduction in credit loss for securities the Company has made the decision to sell or more likely than not will be required to sell

 

13

 

 

Change in credit loss due to accretion of increase in cash flows

 

1

 

 

Ending balance

 

$

(593

)

$

(833

)

 

The Company uses its best estimate of future cash flows expected to be collected from the fixed income security, discounted at the security’s original or current effective rate, as appropriate, to calculate a recovery value and determine whether a credit loss exists.  The determination of cash flow estimates is inherently subjective and methodologies may vary depending on facts and circumstances specific to the security.  All reasonably available information relevant to the collectability of the security, including past events, current conditions, and reasonable

 

8



 

ALLSTATE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

 

and supportable assumptions and forecasts, are considered when developing the estimate of cash flows expected to be collected.  That information generally includes, but is not limited to, the remaining payment terms of the security, prepayment speeds, foreign exchange rates, the financial condition and future earnings potential of the issue or issuer, expected defaults, expected recoveries, the value of underlying collateral, vintage, geographic concentration, available reserves or escrows, current subordination levels, third party guarantees and other credit enhancements.  Other information, such as industry analyst reports and forecasts, sector credit ratings, financial condition of the bond insurer for insured fixed income securities, and other market data relevant to the realizability of contractual cash flows, may also be considered.  The estimated fair value of collateral will be used to estimate recovery value if the Company determines that the security is dependent on the liquidation of collateral for ultimate settlement.  If the estimated recovery value is less than the amortized cost of the security, a credit loss exists and an other-than-temporary impairment for the difference between the estimated recovery value and amortized cost is recorded in earnings.  The portion of the unrealized loss related to factors other than credit remains classified in accumulated other comprehensive income.  If the Company determines that the fixed income security does not have sufficient cash flow or other information to estimate a recovery value for the security, the Company may conclude that the entire decline in fair value is deemed to be credit related and the loss is recorded in earnings.

 

Unrealized net capital gains and losses

 

Unrealized net capital gains and losses included in accumulated other comprehensive income are as follows:

 

 

 

Fair

 

Gross unrealized

 

Unrealized net

 

($ in millions)

 

value

 

Gains

 

Losses

 

gains (losses)

 

March 31, 2011

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fixed income securities

 

$

47,629

 

$

2,242

 

$

(1,366

)

$

876

 

Equity securities

 

213

 

60

 

(1

)

59

 

Short-term investments

 

822

 

 

 

 

Derivative instruments (1)

 

(26

)

 

(26

)

(26

)

EMA limited partnership interests (2)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

4

 

Unrealized net capital gains and losses, pre-tax

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

913

 

Amounts recognized for:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Insurance reserves (3)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(2

)

DAC and DSI (4)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

97

 

Amounts recognized

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

95

 

Deferred income taxes

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(358

)

Unrealized net capital gains and losses, after-tax

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

650

 

 


(1)

Included in the fair value of derivative instruments are $(4) million classified as assets and $22 million classified as liabilities.

(2)

Unrealized net capital gains and losses for limited partnership interests represent the Company’s share of EMA limited partnerships’ other comprehensive income. Fair value and gross gains and losses are not applicable.

(3)

The insurance reserves adjustment represents the amount by which the reserve balance would increase if the net unrealized gains in the applicable product portfolios were realized and reinvested at current lower interest rates, resulting in a premium deficiency. Although the Company evaluates premium deficiencies on the combined performance of life insurance and immediate annuities with life contingencies, the adjustment primarily relates to structured settlement annuities with life contingencies, in addition to annuity buy-outs and certain payout annuities with life contingencies.

(4)

The DAC and DSI adjustment balance represents the amount by which the amortization of DAC and DSI would increase or decrease if the unrealized gains or losses in the respective product portfolios were realized.

 

9



 

ALLSTATE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

 

 

 

Fair

 

Gross unrealized

 

Unrealized net

 

 

 

value

 

Gains

 

Losses

 

gains (losses)

 

December 31, 2010

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fixed income securities

 

$

48,214

 

$

2,422

 

$

(1,694

)

$

728

 

Equity securities

 

211

 

48

 

(1

)

47

 

Short-term investments

 

1,257

 

 

 

 

Derivative instruments (1)

 

(17

)

2

 

(19

)

(17

)

Unrealized net capital gains and losses, pre-tax

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

758

 

Amounts recognized for:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Insurance reserves

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(41

)

DAC and DSI

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

98

 

Amounts recognized

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

57

 

Deferred income taxes

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(290

)

Unrealized net capital gains and losses, after-tax

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

525

 

 


(1)

Included in the fair value of derivative instruments are $2 million classified as assets and $19 million classified as liabilities.

 

Change in unrealized net capital gains and losses

 

The change in unrealized net capital gains and losses for the three months ended March 31, 2011 is as follows:

 

($ in millions)

 

 

 

Fixed income securities

 

$

148

 

Equity securities

 

12

 

Derivative instruments

 

(9

)

EMA limited partnership interests

 

4

 

Total

 

155

 

Amounts recognized for:

 

 

 

Insurance reserves

 

39

 

DAC and DSI

 

(1

)

Increase in amounts recognized

 

38

 

Deferred income taxes

 

(68

)

Increase in unrealized net capital gains and losses

 

$

125

 

 

Portfolio monitoring

 

The Company has a comprehensive portfolio monitoring process to identify and evaluate each fixed income and equity security whose carrying value may be other-than-temporarily impaired.

 

For each fixed income security in an unrealized loss position, the Company assesses whether management with the appropriate authority has made the decision to sell or whether it is more likely than not the Company will be required to sell the security before recovery of the amortized cost basis for reasons such as liquidity, contractual or regulatory purposes.  If a security meets either of these criteria, the security’s decline in fair value is considered other than temporary and is recorded in earnings.

 

If the Company has not made the decision to sell the fixed income security and it is not more likely than not the Company will be required to sell the fixed income security before recovery of its amortized cost basis, the Company evaluates whether it expects to receive cash flows sufficient to recover the entire amortized cost basis of the security.  The Company calculates the estimated recovery value by discounting the best estimate of future cash flows at the security’s original or current effective rate, as appropriate, and compares this to the amortized cost of the security.  If the Company does not expect to receive cash flows sufficient to recover the entire amortized cost basis of the fixed income security, the credit loss component of the impairment is recorded in earnings, with the remaining amount of the unrealized loss related to other factors recognized in other comprehensive income.

 

For equity securities, the Company considers various factors, including whether it has the intent and ability to hold the equity security for a period of time sufficient to recover its cost basis.  Where the Company lacks the intent and ability to hold to recovery, or believes the recovery period is extended, the equity security’s decline in fair value is considered other than temporary and is recorded in earnings.  For equity securities managed by a third party, the

 

10



 

ALLSTATE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

 

Company has contractually retained its decision making authority as it pertains to selling equity securities that are in an unrealized loss position.

 

The Company’s portfolio monitoring process includes a quarterly review of all securities to identify instances where the fair value of a security compared to its amortized cost (for fixed income securities) or cost (for equity securities) is below established thresholds.  The process also includes the monitoring of other impairment indicators such as ratings, ratings downgrades and payment defaults.  The securities identified, in addition to other securities for which the Company may have a concern, are evaluated for potential other-than-temporary impairment using all reasonably available information relevant to the collectability or recovery of the security.  Inherent in the Company’s evaluation of other-than-temporary impairment for these fixed income and equity securities are assumptions and estimates about the financial condition and future earnings potential of the issue or issuer.  Some of the factors considered in evaluating whether a decline in fair value is other than temporary are: 1) the financial condition, near-term and long-term prospects of the issue or issuer, including relevant industry specific market conditions and trends, geographic location and implications of rating agency actions and offering prices; 2) the specific reasons that a security is in an unrealized loss position, including overall market conditions which could affect liquidity; and 3) the length of time and extent to which the fair value has been less than amortized cost or cost.

 

The following table summarizes the gross unrealized losses and fair value of fixed income and equity securities by the length of time that individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position.

 

 

 

Less than 12 months

 

12 months or more

 

Total

 

 

 

Number

 

Fair

 

Unrealized

 

Number

 

Fair

 

Unrealized

 

unrealized

 

($ in millions)

 

of issues

 

value

 

losses

 

of issues

 

value

 

losses

 

losses

 

March 31, 2011

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fixed income securities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

U.S. government and agencies

 

11

 

$

177

 

$

(6

)

 

$

 

$

 

$

(6

)

Municipal

 

125

 

1,415

 

(49

)

162

 

1,071

 

(216

)

(265

)

Corporate

 

423

 

4,881

 

(135

)

139

 

1,929

 

(181

)

(316

)

Foreign government

 

14

 

196

 

(9

)

1

 

10

 

 

(9

)

RMBS

 

144

 

171

 

(3

)

195

 

981

 

(357

)

(360

)

CMBS

 

11

 

120

 

(3

)

94

 

710

 

(162

)

(165

)

ABS

 

22

 

143

 

(3

)

121

 

1,256

 

(242

)

(245

)

Total fixed income securities

 

750

 

7,103

 

(208

)

712

 

5,957

 

(1,158

)

(1,366

)

Equity securities

 

3

 

17

 

(1

)

 

 

 

(1

)

Total fixed income and equity securities

 

753

 

$

7,120

 

$

(209

)

712

 

$

5,957

 

$

(1,158

)

$

(1,367

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Investment grade fixed income securities

 

653

 

$

6,485

 

$

(191

)

475

 

$

4,321

 

$

(588

)

$

(779

)

Below investment grade fixed income securities

 

97

 

618

 

(17

)

237

 

1,636

 

(570

)

(587

)

Total fixed income securities

 

750

 

$

7,103

 

$

(208

)

712

 

$

5,957

 

$

(1,158

)

$

(1,366

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

December 31, 2010

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fixed income securities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

U.S. government and agencies

 

13

 

$

348

 

$

(9

)

 

$

 

$

 

$

(9

)

Municipal

 

142

 

1,718

 

(55

)

170

 

1,145

 

(239

)

(294

)

Corporate

 

340

 

3,805

 

(144

)

143

 

1,951

 

(225

)

(369

)

Foreign government

 

16

 

191

 

(8

)

1

 

10

 

 

(8

)

RMBS

 

108

 

143

 

(3

)

246

 

1,266

 

(448

)

(451

)

CMBS

 

11

 

123

 

(2

)

114

 

836

 

(272

)

(274

)

ABS

 

33

 

262

 

(4

)

130

 

1,288

 

(285

)

(289

)

Total fixed income securities

 

663

 

6,590

 

(225

)

804

 

6,496

 

(1,469

)

(1,694

)

Equity securities

 

3

 

17

 

(1

)

 

 

 

(1

)

Total fixed income and equity securities

 

666

 

$

6,607

 

$

(226

)

804

 

$

6,496

 

$

(1,469

)

$

(1,695

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Investment grade fixed income securities

 

600

 

$

6,222

 

$

(209

)

559

 

$

4,853

 

$

(782

)

$

(991

)

Below investment grade fixed income securities

 

63

 

368

 

(16

)

245

 

1,643

 

(687

)

(703

)

Total fixed income securities

 

663

 

$

6,590

 

$

(225

)

804

 

$

6,496

 

$

(1,469

)

$

(1,694

)

 

As of March 31, 2011, $643 million of unrealized losses are related to securities with an unrealized loss position less than 20% of amortized cost or cost, the degree of which suggests that these securities do not pose a high risk of being other-than-temporarily impaired.  Of the $643 million, $528 million are related to unrealized losses on

 

11



 

ALLSTATE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

 

investment grade fixed income securities.  Investment grade is defined as a security having a rating of Aaa, Aa, A or Baa from Moody’s, a rating of AAA, AA, A or BBB from Standard & Poor’s (“S&P”), Fitch, Dominion or Realpoint, a rating of aaa, aa, a or bbb from A.M. Best, or a comparable internal rating if an externally provided rating is not available.  Unrealized losses on investment grade securities are principally related to widening credit spreads or rising interest rates since the time of initial purchase.

 

As of March 31, 2011, the remaining $724 million of unrealized losses are related to securities in unrealized loss positions greater than or equal to 20% of amortized cost or cost.  Investment grade fixed income securities comprising $251 million of these unrealized losses were evaluated based on factors such as expected cash flows and the financial condition and near-term and long-term prospects of the issue or issuer and were determined to have adequate resources to fulfill contractual obligations.  Of the $724 billion, $473 million are related to below investment grade fixed income securities.  Of these amounts, $424 million of the below investment grade fixed income securities had been in an unrealized loss position for a period of twelve or more consecutive months as of March 31, 2011.  Unrealized losses on below investment grade securities are principally related to RMBS, CMBS and ABS and were the result of wider credit spreads resulting from higher risk premiums since the time of initial purchase, largely due to macroeconomic conditions and credit market deterioration, including the impact of lower real estate valuations.

 

RMBS, CMBS and ABS in an unrealized loss position were evaluated based on actual and projected collateral losses relative to the securities’ positions in the respective securitization trusts, security specific expectations of cash flows, and credit ratings.  This evaluation also takes into consideration credit enhancement, measured in terms of (i) subordination from other classes of securities in the trust that are contractually obligated to absorb losses before the class of security the Company owns, (ii) the expected impact of other structural features embedded in the securitization trust beneficial to the class of securities the Company owns, such as overcollateralization and excess spread, and (iii) for RMBS and ABS in an unrealized loss position, credit enhancements from reliable bond insurers, where applicable.  Municipal bonds in an unrealized loss position were evaluated based on the quality of the underlying securities, taking into consideration credit enhancements from reliable bond insurers, where applicable.  Unrealized losses on equity securities are primarily related to equity market fluctuations.

 

As of March 31, 2011, the Company has not made the decision to sell and it is not more likely than not the Company will be required to sell fixed income securities with unrealized losses before recovery of the amortized cost basis.  As of March 31, 2011, the Company had the intent and ability to hold equity securities with unrealized losses for a period of time sufficient for them to recover.

 

Limited partnerships

 

As of March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the carrying value of equity method limited partnership interests totaled $660 million and $610 million, respectively.  The Company recognizes an impairment loss for equity method investments when evidence demonstrates that the loss is other than temporary.  Evidence of a loss in value that is other than temporary may include the absence of an ability to recover the carrying amount of the investment or the inability of the investee to sustain a level of earnings that would justify the carrying amount of the investment.  The Company had no write-downs related to equity method limited partnership interests for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010.

 

As of March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the carrying value for cost method limited partnership interests was $697 million and $662 million, respectively.  To determine if an other-than-temporary impairment has occurred, the Company evaluates whether an impairment indicator has occurred in the period that may have a significant adverse effect on the carrying value of the investment.  Impairment indicators may include: significantly reduced valuations of the investments held by the limited partnerships; actual recent cash flows received being significantly less than expected cash flows; reduced valuations based on financing completed at a lower value; completed sale of a material underlying investment at a price significantly lower than expected; or any other adverse events since the last financial statements received that might affect the fair value of the investee’s capital.  Additionally, the Company’s portfolio monitoring process includes a quarterly review of all cost method limited partnerships to identify instances where the net asset value is below established thresholds for certain periods of time, as well as investments that are performing below expectations, for further impairment consideration.  If a cost method limited partnership is other-than-temporarily impaired, the carrying value is written down to fair value, generally estimated to be equivalent to the reported net asset value of the underlying funds.  The Company had no write-downs related to

 

12



 

ALLSTATE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

 

cost method investments for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and write-downs of $11 million for the three months ended March 31, 2010.

 

Mortgage loans

 

Mortgage loans are evaluated for impairment on a specific loan basis through a quarterly credit monitoring process and review of key credit quality indicators.  Mortgage loans are considered impaired when it is probable that the Company will not collect the contractual principal and interest.  Valuation allowances are established for impaired loans to reduce the carrying value to the fair value of the collateral less costs to sell or the present value of the loan’s expected future repayment cash flows discounted at the loan’s original effective interest rate.  Impaired mortgage loans may not have a valuation allowance when the fair value of the collateral less costs to sell is higher than the carrying value.  Mortgage loan valuation allowances are charged off when there is no reasonable expectation of recovery.  The impairment evaluation is non-statistical in respect to the aggregate portfolio but considers facts and circumstances attributable to each loan.  It is not considered probable that additional impairment losses, beyond those identified on a specific loan basis, have been incurred as of March 31, 2011.

 

Accrual of income is suspended for mortgage loans that are in default or when full and timely collection of principal and interest payments is not probable.  Cash receipts on mortgage loans on nonaccrual status are generally recorded as a reduction of carrying value.

 

Debt service coverage ratio is considered a key credit quality indicator when mortgage loans are evaluated for impairment.  Debt service coverage ratio represents the amount of estimated cash flows from the property available to the borrower to meet principal and interest payment obligations.  Debt service coverage ratio estimates are updated annually or more frequently if conditions are warranted based on the Company’s credit monitoring process.  The following table reflects the carrying value of non-impaired fixed rate and variable rate mortgage loans summarized by debt service coverage ratio distribution:

 

 

 

March 31, 2011

 

December 31, 2010

 

($ in millions)

 

Fixed rate
mortgage
loans

 

Variable rate
mortgage
loans

 

Total

 

Fixed rate
mortgage
loans

 

Variable rate
mortgage
loans

 

Total

 

Debt service coverage ratio distribution

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Below 1.0

 

$

257

 

$

 

$

257

 

$

275

 

$

 

$

275

 

1.0 - 1.25

 

1,518

 

15

 

1,533

 

1,571

 

16

 

1,587

 

1.26 - 1.50

 

1,469

 

 

1,469

 

1,478

 

 

1,478

 

Above 1.50

 

2,521

 

518

 

3,039

 

2,484

 

546

 

3,030

 

Total non-impaired mortgage loans

 

$

5,765

 

$

533

 

$

6,298

 

$

5,808

 

$

562

 

$

6,370

 

 

Mortgage loans with a debt service coverage ratio below 1.0 that are not considered impaired primarily relate to instances where the borrower has the financial capacity to fund the revenue shortfalls from the properties for the foreseeable term, the decrease in cash flows from the properties is considered temporary, or there are other risk mitigating circumstances such as additional collateral, escrow balances or borrower guarantees.

 

The net carrying value of impaired mortgage loans is as follows:

 

($ in millions)

 

March 31,
2011

 

December 31,
2010

 

Impaired mortgage loans with a valuation allowance

 

$

141

 

$

168

 

Impaired mortgage loans without a valuation allowance

 

22

 

15

 

Total impaired mortgage loans

 

$

163

 

$

183

 

Valuation allowance on impaired mortgage loans

 

$

73

 

$

84

 

 

The average balance of impaired loans was $173 million during the three months ended March 31, 2011.

 

13



 

ALLSTATE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

 

The rollforward of the valuation allowance on impaired mortgage loans for the three months ended March 31, 2011 is as follows:

 

($ in millions)

 

 

 

Beginning balance

 

$

84

 

Net increase in valuation allowance

 

2

 

Charge offs

 

(13

)

Ending balance

 

$

73

 

 

The carrying value of past due mortgage loans is as follows:

 

($ in millions)

 

March 31,
2011

 

December 31,
2010

 

Less than 90 days past due

 

$

1

 

$

12

 

90 days or greater past due

 

65

 

78

 

Total past due

 

66

 

90

 

Current loans

 

6,395

 

6,463

 

Total mortgage loans

 

$

6,461

 

$

6,553

 

 

5.  Fair Value of Assets and Liabilities

 

Fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date.  The hierarchy for inputs used in determining fair value maximizes the use of observable inputs and minimizes the use of unobservable inputs by requiring that observable inputs be used when available.  Assets and liabilities recorded on the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Financial Position at fair value are categorized in the fair value hierarchy based on the observability of inputs to the valuation techniques as follows:

 

Level 1:

Assets and liabilities whose values are based on unadjusted quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in an active market that the Company can access.

 

 

Level 2:

Assets and liabilities whose values are based on the following:

 

 

 

(a)

Quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets;

 

(b)

Quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active; or

 

(c)

Valuation models whose inputs are observable, directly or indirectly, for substantially the full term of the asset or liability.

 

 

Level 3:

Assets and liabilities whose values are based on prices or valuation techniques that require inputs that are both unobservable and significant to the overall fair value measurement.  Unobservable inputs reflect the Company’s estimates of the assumptions that market participants would use in valuing the assets and liabilities.

 

The availability of observable inputs varies by instrument.  In situations where fair value is based on internally developed pricing models or inputs that are unobservable in the market, the determination of fair value requires more judgment.  The degree of judgment exercised by the Company in determining fair value is typically greatest for instruments categorized in Level 3.  In many instances, valuation inputs used to measure fair value fall into different levels of the fair value hierarchy.  The category level in the fair value hierarchy is determined based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement in its entirety.  The Company uses prices and inputs that are current as of the measurement date, including during periods of market disruption.  In periods of market disruption, the ability to observe prices and inputs may be reduced for many instruments.

 

The Company has two types of situations where investments are classified as Level 3 in the fair value hierarchy.  The first is where quotes continue to be received from independent third-party valuation service providers and all significant inputs are market observable; however, there has been a significant decrease in the volume and level of activity for the asset when compared to normal market activity such that the degree of market observability has declined to a point where categorization as a Level 3 measurement is considered appropriate.  The indicators considered in determining whether a significant decrease in the volume and level of activity for a specific asset has occurred include the level of new issuances in the primary market, trading volume in the secondary market, the level

 

14



 

ALLSTATE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

 

of credit spreads over historical levels, applicable bid-ask spreads, and price consensus among market participants and other pricing sources.

 

The second situation where the Company classifies securities in Level 3 is where specific inputs significant to the fair value estimation models are not market observable.  This occurs in two primary instances.  The first relates to the Company’s use of broker quotes.  The second relates to auction rate securities (“ARS”) backed by student loans for which a key input, the anticipated date liquidity will return to this market, is not market observable.

 

Certain assets are not carried at fair value on a recurring basis, including investments such as mortgage loans, limited partnership interests, bank loans and policy loans.  Accordingly, such investments are only included in the fair value hierarchy disclosure when the investment is subject to remeasurement at fair value after initial recognition and the resulting remeasurement is reflected in the condensed consolidated financial statements.  In addition, derivatives embedded in fixed income securities are not disclosed in the hierarchy as free-standing derivatives since they are presented with the host contracts in fixed income securities.

 

In determining fair value, the Company principally uses the market approach which generally utilizes market transaction data for the same or similar instruments.  To a lesser extent, the Company uses the income approach which involves determining fair values from discounted cash flow methodologies.  For the majority of Level 2 and Level 3 valuations, a combination of the market and income approaches is used.

 

Summary of significant valuation techniques for assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis

 

Level 1 measurements

 

·                  Fixed income securities:  Comprise U.S. Treasuries.  Valuation is based on unadjusted quoted prices for identical assets in active markets that the Company can access.

 

·                  Equity securities:  Comprise actively traded, exchange-listed U.S. and international equity securities. Valuation is based on unadjusted quoted prices for identical assets in active markets that the Company can access.

 

·                  Short-term:  Comprise actively traded money market funds that have daily quoted net asset values for identical assets that the Company can access.

 

·                  Separate account assets:  Comprise actively traded mutual funds that have daily quoted net asset values for identical assets that the Company can access.  Net asset values for the actively traded mutual funds in which the separate account assets are invested are obtained daily from the fund managers.

 

Level 2 measurements

 

·                  Fixed income securities:

 

U.S. government and agencies:  The primary inputs to the valuation include quoted prices for identical or similar assets in markets that are not active, contractual cash flows, benchmark yields and credit spreads.

 

Municipal:  The primary inputs to the valuation include quoted prices for identical or similar assets in markets that are not active, contractual cash flows, benchmark yields and credit spreads.

 

Corporate, including privately placed:  The primary inputs to the valuation include quoted prices for identical or similar assets in markets that are not active, contractual cash flows, benchmark yields and credit spreads.  Also included are privately placed securities valued using a discounted cash flow model that is widely accepted in the financial services industry and uses market observable inputs and inputs derived principally from, or corroborated by, observable market data.  The primary inputs to the discounted cash flow model include an interest rate yield curve, as well as published credit spreads for similar assets in markets that are not active that incorporate the credit quality and industry sector of the issuer.

 

Foreign government:  The primary inputs to the valuation include quoted prices for identical or similar assets in markets that are not active, contractual cash flows, benchmark yields and credit spreads.

 

RMBS - U.S. government sponsored entities (“U.S. Agency”), Prime residential mortgage-backed securities (“Prime”) and Alt-A residential mortgage-backed securities (“Alt-A”); ABS - other:  The primary inputs to the valuation include quoted prices for identical or similar assets in markets that are not

 

15



 

ALLSTATE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

 

active, contractual cash flows, benchmark yields, prepayment speeds, collateral performance and credit spreads.

 

CMBS:  The primary inputs to the valuation include quoted prices for identical or similar assets in markets that are not active, contractual cash flows, benchmark yields, collateral performance and credit spreads.

 

Redeemable preferred stock:  The primary inputs to the valuation include quoted prices for identical or similar assets in markets that are not active, contractual cash flows, benchmark yields, underlying stock prices and credit spreads.

 

·                  Equity securities:  The primary inputs to the valuation include quoted prices for identical or similar assets in markets that are not active.

 

·                  Short-term:  The primary inputs to the valuation include quoted prices for identical or similar assets in markets that are not active, contractual cash flows, benchmark yields and credit spreads.  For certain short-term investments, amortized cost is used as the best estimate of fair value.

 

·                  Other investments:  Free-standing exchange listed derivatives that are not actively traded are valued based on quoted prices for identical instruments in markets that are not active.

 

OTC derivatives, including interest rate swaps, foreign currency swaps, foreign exchange forward contracts, and certain credit default swaps, are valued using models that rely on inputs such as interest rate yield curves, currency rates, and counterparty credit spreads that are observable for substantially the full term of the contract.  The valuation techniques underlying the models are widely accepted in the financial services industry and do not involve significant judgment.

 

Level 3 measurements

 

·                  Fixed income securities:

 

Municipal:  ARS primarily backed by student loans that have become illiquid due to failures in the auction market are valued using a discounted cash flow model that is widely accepted in the financial services industry and uses significant non-market observable inputs, including estimates of future coupon rates if auction failures continue, the anticipated date liquidity will return to the market and illiquidity premium.  Also included are municipal bonds that are not rated by third party credit rating agencies but are rated by the National Association of Insurance Commissioners (“NAIC”), and other high-yield municipal bonds.  The primary inputs to the valuation of these municipal bonds include quoted prices for identical or similar assets in markets that exhibit less liquidity relative to those markets supporting Level 2 fair value measurements, contractual cash flows, benchmark yields and credit spreads.

 

Corporate, including privately placed:  Primarily valued based on non-binding broker quotes.  Also included are equity-indexed notes which are valued using a discounted cash flow model that is widely accepted in the financial services industry and uses significant non-market observable inputs, such as volatility.  Other inputs include an interest rate yield curve, as well as published credit spreads for similar assets that incorporate the credit quality and industry sector of the issuer.

 

RMBS - Subprime residential mortgage-backed securities (“Subprime”), Prime and Alt-A:  The primary inputs to the valuation include quoted prices for identical or similar assets in markets that exhibit less liquidity relative to those markets supporting Level 2 fair value measurements, contractual cash flows, benchmark yields, prepayment speeds, collateral performance and credit spreads.  Also included are Subprime, Prime and Alt-A securities that are valued based on non-binding broker quotes.  Due to the reduced availability of actual market prices or relevant observable inputs as a result of the decrease in liquidity that has been experienced in the market for these securities, Subprime and certain Alt-A securities are categorized as Level 3.

 

CMBS:  The primary inputs to the valuation include quoted prices for identical or similar assets in markets that exhibit less liquidity relative to those markets supporting Level 2 fair value measurements, contractual cash flows, benchmark yields, collateral performance and credit spreads.  Also included are CMBS that are valued based on non-binding broker quotes.  Due to the reduced availability of actual market prices or

 

16



 

ALLSTATE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

 

relevant observable inputs as a result of the decrease in liquidity that has been experienced in the market for these securities, certain CMBS are categorized as Level 3.

 

ABS - Collateralized debt obligations (“CDO”):  Valued based on non-binding broker quotes received from brokers who are familiar with the investments.  Due to the reduced availability of actual market prices or relevant observable inputs as a result of the decrease in liquidity that has been experienced in the market for these securities, all CDO are categorized as Level 3.

 

ABS - other:  The primary inputs to the valuation include quoted prices for identical or similar assets in markets that exhibit less liquidity relative to those markets supporting Level 2 fair value measurements, contractual cash flows, benchmark yields, prepayment speeds, collateral performance and credit spreads.  Also included are ABS that are valued based on non-binding broker quotes.  Due to the reduced availability of actual market prices or relevant observable inputs as a result of the decrease in liquidity that has been experienced in the market for these securities, certain ABS are categorized as Level 3.

 

·                  Other investments:  Certain OTC derivatives, such as interest rate caps and floors, certain credit default swaps and OTC options (including swaptions), are valued using models that are widely accepted in the financial services industry.  These are categorized as Level 3 as a result of the significance of non-market observable inputs such as volatility.  Other primary inputs include interest rate yield curves and credit spreads.

 

·                  Contractholder funds:  Derivatives embedded in certain life and annuity contracts are valued internally using models widely accepted in the financial services industry that determine a single best estimate of fair value for the embedded derivatives within a block of contractholder liabilities.  The models primarily use stochastically determined cash flows based on the contractual elements of embedded derivatives, projected option cost and applicable market data, such as interest rate yield curves and equity index volatility assumptions.  These are categorized as Level 3 as a result of the significance of non-market observable inputs.

 

Assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis

 

Mortgage loans written-down to fair value in connection with recognizing impairments are valued based on the fair value of the underlying collateral less costs to sell.  Limited partnership interests written-down to fair value in connection with recognizing other-than-temporary impairments are valued using net asset values.

 

17



 

ALLSTATE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

 

The following table summarizes the Company’s assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring and non-recurring basis as of March 31, 2011:

 

($ in millions)

 

Quoted prices
in active
markets for
identical assets

(Level 1)

 

Significant
other
observable
inputs
(Level 2)

 

Significant
unobservable
inputs
(Level 3)

 

Counterparty
and cash
collateral
netting

 

Balance
as of
March 31,
2011

 

Assets

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fixed income securities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

U.S. government and agencies

 

$

757

 

$

1,760

 

$

 

 

 

$

2,517

 

Municipal

 

 

4,174

 

544

 

 

 

4,718

 

Corporate

 

 

28,009

 

1,848

 

 

 

29,857

 

Foreign government

 

 

2,186

 

 

 

 

2,186

 

RMBS

 

 

2,944

 

984

 

 

 

3,928

 

CMBS

 

 

989

 

966

 

 

 

1,955

 

ABS

 

 

635

 

1,818

 

 

 

2,453

 

Redeemable preferred stock

 

 

14

 

1

 

 

 

15

 

Total fixed income securities

 

757

 

40,711

 

6,161

 

 

 

47,629

 

Equity securities

 

144

 

55

 

14

 

 

 

213

 

Short-term investments

 

95

 

727

 

 

 

 

822

 

Other investments:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Free-standing derivatives

 

 

589

 

9

 

$

(87

)

511

 

Separate account assets

 

8,603

 

 

 

 

 

8,603

 

Other assets

 

 

 

1

 

 

 

1

 

Total recurring basis assets

 

9,599

 

42,082

 

6,185

 

(87

)

57,779

 

Non-recurring basis (1)

 

 

 

37

 

 

 

37

 

Total assets at fair value

 

$

9,599

 

$

42,082

 

$

6,222

 

$

(87

)

$

57,816

 

% of total assets at fair value

 

16.6

%

72.8

%

10.8

%

(0.2

)%

100.0

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Liabilities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Contractholder funds:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Derivatives embedded in life and annuity contracts

 

$

 

$

 

$

(630

)

 

 

$

(630

)

Other liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Free-standing derivatives

 

 

(296

)

(73

)

$

87

 

(282

)

Total liabilities at fair value

 

$

 

$

(296

)

$

(703

)

$

87

 

$

(912

)

% of total liabilities at fair value

 

%

32.4

%

77.1

%

(9.5

)%

100.0

%

 


(1)

Includes $27 million of mortgage loans and $10 million of other investments written-down to fair value in connection with recognizing other-than-temporary impairments.

 

18



 

ALLSTATE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

 

The following table summarizes the Company’s assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring and non-recurring basis as of December 31, 2010:

 

($ in millions)

 

Quoted prices
in active
markets for
identical assets

(Level 1)

 

Significant
other
observable
inputs
(Level 2)

 

Significant
unobservable
inputs
(Level 3)

 

Counterparty
and cash
collateral
netting

 

Balance as of
December 31,
2010

 

Assets

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fixed income securities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

U.S. government and agencies

 

$

882

 

$

2,612

 

$

 

 

 

$

3,494

 

Municipal

 

 

4,372

 

601

 

 

 

4,973

 

Corporate

 

 

26,890

 

1,760

 

 

 

28,650

 

Foreign government

 

 

2,257

 

 

 

 

2,257

 

RMBS

 

 

3,166

 

1,189

 

 

 

4,355

 

CMBS

 

 

1,059

 

844

 

 

 

1,903

 

ABS

 

 

593

 

1,974

 

 

 

2,567

 

Redeemable preferred stock

 

 

14

 

1

 

 

 

15

 

Total fixed income securities

 

882

 

40,963

 

6,369

 

 

 

48,214

 

Equity securities

 

137

 

45

 

29

 

 

 

211

 

Short-term investments

 

72

 

1,185

 

 

 

 

1,257

 

Other investments:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Free-standing derivatives

 

 

602

 

10

 

$

(225

)

387

 

Separate account assets

 

8,676

 

 

 

 

 

8,676

 

Other assets

 

 

 

1

 

 

 

1

 

Total recurring basis assets

 

9,767

 

42,795

 

6,409

 

(225

)

58,746

 

Non-recurring basis (1)

 

 

 

117

 

 

 

117

 

Total assets at fair value

 

$

9,767

 

$

42,795

 

$

6,526

 

$

(225

)

$

58,863

 

% of total assets at fair value

 

16.6

%

72.7

%

11.1

%

(0.4

)%

100.0

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Liabilities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Contractholder funds:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Derivatives embedded in life and annuity contracts

 

$

 

$

 

$

(653

)

 

 

$

(653

)

Other liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Free-standing derivatives

 

 

(455

)

(87

)

$

221

 

(321

)

Total liabilities at fair value

 

$

 

$

(455

)

$

(740

)

$

221

 

$

(974

)

% of total liabilities at fair value

 

%

46.7

%

76.0

%

(22.7

)%

100.0

%

 


(1)

Includes $111 million of mortgage loans and $6 million of limited partnership interests written-down to fair value in connection with recognizing other-than-temporary impairments.

 

19



 

ALLSTATE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

 

The following table presents the rollforward of Level 3 assets and liabilities held at fair value on a recurring basis during the three months ended March 31, 2011.

 

 

 

 

 

Total realized and
unrealized gains (losses)
included in:

 

 

 

 

 

($ in millions)

 

Balance as of
December 31,
2010

 

Net
income (1)

 

OCI on
Statement
of Financial
Position

 

Transfers
into

Level 3

 

Transfers
out of
Level 3

 

Assets

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fixed income securities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Municipal

 

$

601

 

$

1

 

$

6

 

$

 

$

(1

)

Corporate

 

1,760

 

11

 

10

 

93

 

(36

)

RMBS

 

1,189

 

(38

)

71

 

 

(3

)

CMBS

 

844

 

(20

)

113

 

55

 

 

ABS

 

1,974

 

43

 

14

 

 

(95

)

Redeemable preferred stock

 

1

 

 

 

 

 

Total fixed income securities

 

6,369

 

(3

)

214

 

148

 

(135

)

Equity securities

 

29

 

(5

)

 

 

(10

)

Other investments:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Free-standing derivatives, net

 

(77

)

9

 

 

 

 

Other assets

 

1

 

 

 

 

 

Total recurring Level 3 assets

 

$

6,322

 

$

1

 

$

214

 

$

148

 

$

(145

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Liabilities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Contractholder funds:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Derivatives embedded in life and annuity contracts

 

$

(653

)

$

8

 

$

 

$

 

$

 

Total recurring Level 3 liabilities

 

$

(653

)

$

8

 

$

 

$

 

$

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Purchases

 

Sales

 

Issuances

 

Settlements

 

Balance as
of March 31,
2011

 

Assets

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fixed income securities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Municipal

 

$

10

 

$

(73

)

$

 

$

 

$

544

 

Corporate

 

35

 

(19

)

 

(6

)

1,848

 

RMBS

 

 

(184

)

 

(51

)

984

 

CMBS

 

 

(25

)

 

(1

)

966

 

ABS

 

25

 

(105

)

 

(38

)

1,818

 

Redeemable preferred stock

 

 

 

 

 

1

 

Total fixed income securities

 

70

 

(406

)

 

(96

)

6,161

 

Equity securities

 

 

 

 

 

14

 

Other investments:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Free-standing derivatives, net

 

10

 

 

 

(6

)

(64

)(2)

Other assets

 

 

 

 

 

1

 

Total recurring Level 3 assets

 

$

80

 

$

(406

)

$

 

$

(102

)

$

6,112

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Liabilities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Contractholder funds:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Derivatives embedded in life and annuity contracts

 

$

 

$

 

$

(14

)

$

29

 

$

(630

)

Total recurring Level 3 liabilities

 

$

 

$

 

$

(14

)

$

29

 

$

(630

)

 


(1)

The effect to net income totals $9 million and is reported in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations as follows: $(6) million in realized capital gains and losses, $7 million in net investment income, $37 million in interest credited to contractholder funds and $(45) million in contract benefits.

(2)

Comprises $9 million of assets and $73 million of liabilities.

 

20



 

ALLSTATE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

 

The following table presents the rollforward of Level 3 assets and liabilities held at fair value on a recurring basis during the three months ended March 31, 2010.

 

 

 

 

 

Total realized and
unrealized gains (losses)
included in:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

($ in millions)

 

Balance as of
December 31,
2009

 

Net
income (1)

 

OCI on
Statement of
Financial
Position

 

Purchases, sales,
issuances and
settlements, net

 

Transfers
into

Level 3

 

Transfers
out of
Level 3

 

Balance as of
March 31, 2010

 

Assets

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fixed income securities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Municipal

 

$

746

 

$

(5

)

$

7

 

$

(48

)

$

 

$

(19

)

$

681

 

Corporate

 

2,020

 

(16

)

91

 

(56

)

3

 

(75

)

1,967

 

Foreign government

 

20

 

 

 

(20

)

 

 

 

RMBS

 

1,052

 

(40

)

109

 

266

 

 

 

1,387

 

CMBS

 

1,322

 

(34

)

109

 

(179

)

24

 

(209

)

1,033

 

ABS

 

1,710

 

5

 

86

 

99

 

 

 

1,900

 

Redeemable preferred stock

 

1

 

 

 

 

 

 

1

 

Total fixed income securities

 

6,871

 

(90

)

402

 

62

 

27

 

(303

)

6,969

 

Equity securities

 

27

 

 

2

 

2

 

 

 

31

 

Other investments:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Free-standing derivatives, net

 

(53

)

(24

)

 

7

 

 

 

(70

)(2)

Other assets

 

2

 

 

 

 

 

 

2

 

Total recurring Level 3 assets

 

$

6,847

 

$

(114

)

$

404

 

$

71

 

$

27

 

$

(303

)

$

6,932

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Liabilities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Contractholder funds:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Derivatives embedded in life and annuity contracts

 

$

(110

)

$

18

 

$

 

$

2

 

$

 

$

 

$

(90

)

Total recurring Level 3 liabilities

 

$

(110

)

$

18

 

$

 

$

2

 

$

 

$

 

$

(90

)

 


(1)

The effect to net income totals $(96) million and is reported in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations as follows: $(144) million in realized capital gains and losses, $29 million in net investment income, $(1) million in interest credited to contractholder funds and $(18) million in contract benefits.

(2)

Comprises $20 million of assets and $90 million of liabilities.

 

Transfers between level categorizations may occur due to changes in the availability of market observable inputs, which generally are caused by changes in market conditions such as liquidity, trading volume or bid-ask spreads.  Transfers between level categorizations may also occur due to changes in the valuation source.  For example, in situations where a fair value quote is not provided by the Company’s independent third-party valuation service provider and as a result the price is stale or has been replaced with a broker quote, the security is transferred into Level 3.  Transfers in and out of level categorizations are reported as having occurred at the beginning of the quarter in which the transfer occurred.  Therefore, for all transfers into Level 3, all realized and changes in unrealized gains and losses in the quarter of transfer are reflected in the Level 3 rollforward table.

 

There were no transfers between Level 1 and Level 2 during the three months ended March 31, 2011 or 2010.

 

During the three months ended March 31, 2010, certain CMBS were transferred into Level 2 from Level 3 as a result of increased liquidity in the market and the availability of market observable quoted prices for similar assets.  When transferring these securities into Level 2, the Company did not change the source of fair value estimates or modify the estimates received from independent third-party valuation service providers or the internal valuation approach.  Accordingly, for securities included within this group, there was no change in fair value in conjunction with the transfer resulting in a realized or unrealized gain or loss.

 

Transfers into Level 3 during the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010 included situations where a fair value quote was not provided by the Company’s independent third-party valuation service provider and as a result the price was stale or had been replaced with a broker quote resulting in the security being classified as Level 3.  Transfers out of Level 3 during the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010 included situations where a broker quote was used in the prior period and a fair value quote became available from the Company’s independent third-party valuation service provider in the current period.  A quote utilizing the new pricing source was not available as of the prior period, and any gains or losses related to the change in valuation source for individual securities were not significant.

 

21



 

ALLSTATE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

 

The following table provides the total gains and (losses) included in net income during the three months ended March 31 for Level 3 assets and liabilities still held as of March 31.

 

($ in millions)

 

2011

 

2010

 

Assets

 

 

 

 

 

Fixed income securities:

 

 

 

 

 

Municipal

 

$

 

$

(4

)

Corporate

 

9

 

(18

)

RMBS

 

(24

)

(39

)

CMBS

 

(16

)

(23

)

ABS

 

1

 

 

Total fixed income securities

 

(30

)

(84

)

Equity securities

 

(5

)

 

Other investments:

 

 

 

 

 

Free-standing derivatives, net

 

4

 

(18

)

Total recurring Level 3 assets

 

$

(31

)

$

(102

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Liabilities

 

 

 

 

 

Contractholder funds:

 

 

 

 

 

Derivatives embedded in life and annuity contracts

 

$

8

 

$

18

 

Total recurring Level 3 liabilities

 

$

8

 

$

18

 

 

The amounts in the table above represent gains and losses included in net income for the period of time that the asset or liability was determined to be in Level 3.  These gains and losses total $(23) million for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and are reported in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations as follows: $(38) million in realized capital gains and losses, $7 million in net investment income, $37 million in interest credited to contractholder funds and $(45) million in contract benefits.  These gains and losses total $(84) million for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and are reported in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations as follows: $(130) million in realized capital gains and losses, $28 million in net investment income and $(18) million in contract benefits.

 

Presented below are the carrying values and fair value estimates of financial instruments not carried at fair value.

 

Financial assets

 

 

 

March 31, 2011

 

December 31, 2010

 

($ in millions)

 

Carrying
value

 

Fair
value

 

Carrying
value

 

Fair
value

 

Mortgage loans

 

$

6,461

 

$

6,367

 

$

6,553

 

$

6,312

 

Limited partnership interests - cost basis

 

697

 

806

 

662

 

719

 

Bank loans

 

296

 

293

 

322

 

314

 

Notes due from related party

 

275

 

247

 

275

 

245

 

 

The fair value of mortgage loans is based on discounted contractual cash flows, or if the loans are impaired due to credit reasons, the fair value of collateral less costs to sell.  Risk adjusted discount rates are selected using current rates at which similar loans would be made to borrowers with similar characteristics, using similar types of properties as collateral.  The fair value of limited partnership interests accounted for on the cost basis is determined using reported net asset values of the underlying funds.  The fair value of bank loans, which are reported in other investments, is based on broker quotes from brokers familiar with the loans and current market conditions.  The fair value of notes due from related party, which are reported in other investments, is based on discounted cash flow calculations using current interest rates for instruments with comparable terms.

 

22



 

ALLSTATE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

 

Financial liabilities

 

 

 

March 31, 2011

 

December 31, 2010

 

($ in millions)

 

Carrying
value

 

Fair
value

 

Carrying
value

 

Fair
value

 

Contractholder funds on investment contracts

 

$

33,771

 

$

32,904

 

$

35,040

 

$

34,056

 

Notes due to related parties

 

686

 

653

 

677

 

649

 

Liability for collateral

 

602

 

602

 

465

 

465

 

 

The fair value of contractholder funds on investment contracts is based on the terms of the underlying contracts utilizing prevailing market rates for similar contracts adjusted for the Company’s own credit risk.  Deferred annuities included in contractholder funds are valued using discounted cash flow models which incorporate market value margins, which are based on the cost of holding economic capital, and the Company’s own credit risk.  Immediate annuities without life contingencies and fixed rate funding agreements are valued at the present value of future benefits using market implied interest rates which include the Company’s own credit risk.

 

The fair value of notes due to related parties is based on discounted cash flow calculations using current interest rates for instruments with comparable terms and considers the Company’s own credit risk.  The liability for collateral is valued at carrying value due to its short-term nature.

 

6.  Derivative Financial Instruments

 

The Company primarily uses derivatives for risk management and asset replication.  In addition, the Company has derivatives embedded in non-derivative host contracts that are required to be separated from the host contracts and accounted for at fair value.  With the exception of non-hedge derivatives used for asset replication and non-hedge embedded derivatives, all of the Company’s derivatives are evaluated for their ongoing effectiveness as either accounting hedge or non-hedge derivative financial instruments on at least a quarterly basis.  The Company does not use derivatives for trading purposes.  Non-hedge accounting is generally used for “portfolio” level hedging strategies where the terms of the individual hedged items do not meet the strict homogeneity requirements to permit the application of hedge accounting.

 

Asset-liability management is a risk management strategy that is principally employed to balance the respective interest-rate sensitivities of the Company’s assets and liabilities.  Depending upon the attributes of the assets acquired and liabilities issued, derivative instruments such as interest rate swaps, caps, floors, swaptions and futures are utilized to change the interest rate characteristics of existing assets and liabilities to ensure the relationship is maintained within specified ranges and to reduce exposure to rising or falling interest rates. The Company uses financial futures and interest rate swaps to hedge anticipated asset purchases and liability issuances and futures and options for hedging the Company’s equity exposure contained in equity indexed life and annuity product contracts that offer equity returns to contractholders.  In addition, the Company also uses interest rate swaps to hedge interest rate risk inherent in funding agreements.

 

Credit default swaps are typically used to mitigate the credit risk within the Company’s fixed income portfolio.  The Company uses foreign currency swaps primarily to reduce the foreign currency risk associated with issuing foreign currency denominated funding agreements and holding foreign currency denominated investments.

 

When derivatives meet specific criteria, they may be designated as accounting hedges and accounted for as fair value, cash flow, foreign currency fair value or foreign currency cash flow hedges.  The Company designates certain of its interest rate and foreign currency swap contracts and certain investment risk transfer reinsurance agreements as fair value hedges when the hedging instrument is highly effective in offsetting the risk of changes in the fair value of the hedged item.  The Company designates certain of its foreign currency swap contracts as cash flow hedges when the hedging instrument is highly effective in offsetting the exposure of variations in cash flows for the hedged risk that could affect net income.  Amounts are reclassified to net investment income or realized capital gains and losses as the hedged item affects net income.

 

Asset replication refers to the “synthetic” creation of assets through the use of derivatives and primarily investment grade host bonds to replicate securities that are either unavailable in the cash markets or more economical to acquire in synthetic form.  The Company replicates fixed income securities using a combination of a credit default swap and one or more highly rated fixed income securities to synthetically replicate the economic characteristics of one or more cash market securities.

 

23



 

ALLSTATE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

 

The Company’s primary embedded derivatives are equity options in life and annuity product contracts, which provide equity returns to contractholders; equity-indexed notes containing equity call options, which provide a coupon payout that is determined using one or more equity-based indices; credit default swaps in synthetic collateralized debt obligations, which provide enhanced coupon rates as a result of selling credit protection; and conversion options in fixed income securities, which provide the Company with the right to convert the instrument into a predetermined number of shares of common stock.  Substantially all of the fixed income securities with conversion options were sold in March 2011.

 

The notional amounts specified in the contracts are used to calculate the exchange of contractual payments under the agreements and are generally not representative of the potential for gain or loss on these agreements.  However, the notional amounts specified in credit default swaps where the Company has sold credit protection represent the maximum amount of potential loss, assuming no recoveries.

 

Fair value, which is equal to the carrying value, is the estimated amount that the Company would receive or pay to terminate the derivative contracts at the reporting date.  The carrying value amounts for OTC derivatives are further adjusted for the effects, if any, of legally enforceable master netting agreements and are presented on a net basis, by counterparty agreement, in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Financial Position.  For certain exchange traded derivatives, the exchange requires margin deposits as well as daily cash settlements of margin accounts.  As of March 31, 2011, the Company pledged $7 million of cash and securities in the form of margin deposits.

 

For those derivatives which qualify for fair value hedge accounting, net income includes the changes in the fair value of both the derivative instrument and the hedged risk, and therefore reflects any hedging ineffectiveness.  For cash flow hedges, gains and losses are amortized from accumulated other comprehensive income and are reported in net income in the same period the forecasted transactions being hedged impact net income.  For embedded derivatives in fixed income securities, net income includes the change in fair value of the embedded derivative and accretion income related to the host instrument.  For non-hedge derivatives, net income includes changes in fair value and accrued periodic settlements, when applicable.

 

24



 

ALLSTATE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

 

The following table provides a summary of the volume and fair value positions of derivative instruments as well as their reporting location in the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Financial Position as of March 31, 2011.

 

 

 

Asset derivatives

 

 

 

 

 

Volume (1)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

($ in millions, except number of contracts)

 

Balance sheet location

 

Notional
amount

 

Number
of
contracts

 

Fair
value,
net

 

Gross
asset

 

Gross
liability

 

Derivatives designated as accounting hedging instruments

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest rate swap agreements

 

Other investments

 

$

252

 

n/a

 

$

(16

)

$

 

$

(16

)

Foreign currency swap agreements

 

Other investments

 

50

 

n/a

 

(4

)

3

 

(7

)

Total

 

 

 

$

302

 

n/a

 

$

(20

)

$

3

 

$

(23

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Derivatives not designated as accounting hedging instruments

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest rate contracts

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest rate swap agreements

 

Other investments

 

$

5,386

 

n/a

 

$

152

 

$

178

 

$

(26

)

Interest rate swaption agreements

 

Other investments

 

750

 

n/a

 

3

 

3

 

 

Interest rate cap and floor agreements

 

Other investments

 

1,352

 

n/a

 

(3

)

 

(3

)

Financial futures contracts and options

 

Other assets

 

n/a

 

702

 

 

 

 

Equity and index contracts

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Options, futures and warrants (2)

 

Other investments

 

142

 

18,916

 

381

 

381

 

 

Options, futures and warrants

 

Other assets

 

n/a

 

705

 

 

 

 

Foreign currency contracts

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Foreign currency swap agreements

 

Other investments

 

40

 

n/a

 

1

 

1

 

 

Embedded derivative financial instruments

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Conversion options

 

Fixed income securities

 

5

 

n/a

 

 

 

 

Equity-indexed call options

 

Fixed income securities

 

300

 

n/a

 

50

 

50

 

 

Credit default swaps

 

Fixed income securities

 

179

 

n/a

 

(86

)

 

(86

)

Credit default contracts

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Credit default swaps — buying protection

 

Other investments

 

48

 

n/a

 

(2

)

 

(2

)

Credit default swaps — selling protection

 

Other investments

 

30

 

n/a

 

(1

)

1

 

(2

)

Other contracts

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other contracts

 

Other investments

 

6

 

n/a

 

 

 

 

Other contracts

 

Other assets

 

5

 

n/a

 

1

 

1

 

 

Total

 

 

 

$

8,243

 

20,323

 

$

496

 

$

615

 

$

(119

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total asset derivatives

 

 

 

$

8,545

 

20,323

 

$

476

 

$

618

 

$

(142

)

 


(1)

Volume for OTC derivative contracts is represented by their notional amounts. Volume for exchange traded derivatives is represented by the number of contracts, which is the basis on which they are traded. (n/a = not applicable)

(2)

In addition to the number of contracts presented in the table, the Company held 837,100 stock warrants. Stock warrants can be converted to cash upon sale of those instruments or exercised for shares of common stock.

 

25



 

ALLSTATE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

 

 

 

Liability derivatives

 

 

 

 

 

Volume (1)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balance sheet location

 

Notional
amount

 

Number
of
contracts

 

Fair
value,
net

 

Gross
asset

 

Gross
liability

 

Derivatives designated as accounting hedging instruments

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest rate swap agreements

 

Other liabilities & accrued expenses

 

$

59

 

n/a

 

$

(4

)

$

 

$

(4

)

Foreign currency swap agreements

 

Other liabilities & accrued expenses

 

152

 

n/a

 

(22

)

 

(22

)

Total

 

 

 

$

211

 

n/a

 

$

(26

)

$

 

$

(26

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Derivatives not designated as accounting hedging instruments

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest rate contracts

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest rate swap agreements

 

Other liabilities & accrued expenses

 

$

1,018

 

n/a

 

$

17

 

$

26

 

$

(9

)

Interest rate cap and floor agreements

 

Other liabilities & accrued expenses

 

2,020

 

n/a

 

(18

)

2

 

(20

)

Financial futures contracts and options

 

Other liabilities & accrued expenses

 

n/a

 

440

 

 

 

 

Equity and index contracts

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Options and futures

 

Other liabilities & accrued expenses

 

4

 

19,427

 

(207

)

 

(207

)

Foreign currency contracts

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Foreign currency swap agreements

 

Other liabilities & accrued expenses

 

50

 

n/a

 

1

 

1

 

 

Embedded derivative financial instruments

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Guaranteed accumulation benefits

 

Contractholder funds

 

1,115

 

n/a

 

(58

)

 

(58

)

Guaranteed withdrawal benefits

 

Contractholder funds

 

761

 

n/a

 

(29

)

 

(29

)

Equity-indexed and forward starting options in life and annuity product contracts

 

Contractholder funds

 

4,624

 

n/a

 

(537

)

 

(537

)

Other embedded derivative financial instruments

 

Contractholder funds

 

85

 

n/a

 

(6

)

 

(6

)

Credit default contracts

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Credit default swaps — buying protection

 

Other liabilities & accrued expenses

 

61

 

n/a

 

 

1

 

(1

)

Credit default swaps — selling protection

 

Other liabilities & accrued expenses

 

277

 

n/a

 

(49

)

1

 

(50

)

Total

 

 

 

$

10,015

 

19,867

 

$

(886

)

$

31

 

$

(917

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total liability derivatives

 

 

 

$

10,226

 

19,867

 

$

(912

)

$

31

 

$

(943

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total derivatives

 

 

 

$

18,771

 

40,190

 

$

(436

)

 

 

 

 

 


(1) Volume for OTC derivative contracts is represented by their notional amounts.  Volume for exchange traded derivatives is represented by the number of contracts, which is the basis on which they are traded.  (n/a = not applicable)

 

26



 

ALLSTATE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

 

The following table provides a summary of the volume and fair value positions of derivative instruments as well as their reporting location in the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Financial Position as of December 31, 2010.

 

 

 

Asset derivatives

 

 

 

 

 

Volume (1)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

($ in millions, except number of contracts)

 

Balance sheet location

 

Notional
amount

 

Number
of
contracts

 

Fair
value,
net

 

Gross
asset

 

Gross
liability

 

Derivatives designated as accounting hedging instruments

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest rate swap agreements

 

Other investments

 

$

156

 

n/a

 

$

(18

)

$

 

$

(18

)

Foreign currency swap agreements

 

Other investments

 

64

 

n/a

 

2

 

3

 

(1

)

Total

 

 

 

$

220

 

n/a

 

$

(16

)

$

3

 

$

(19

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Derivatives not designated as accounting hedging instruments

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest rate contracts

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest rate swap agreements

 

Other investments

 

$

1,094

 

n/a

 

$

79

 

$

81

 

$

(2

)

Interest rate cap and floor agreements

 

Other investments

 

226

 

n/a

 

(2

)

1

 

(3

)

Financial futures contracts and options

 

Other assets

 

n/a

 

1,420

 

 

 

 

Equity and index contracts

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Options, futures and warrants (2)

 

Other investments

 

64

 

20,451

 

327

 

327

 

 

Foreign currency contracts

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Foreign currency swap agreements

 

Other investments

 

90

 

n/a

 

6

 

6

 

 

Embedded derivative financial instruments

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Conversion options

 

Fixed income securities

 

287

 

n/a

 

84

 

84

 

 

Equity-indexed call options

 

Fixed income securities

 

300

 

n/a

 

47

 

47

 

 

Credit default swaps

 

Fixed income securities

 

179

 

n/a

 

(87

)

 

(87

)

Credit default contracts

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Credit default swaps — buying protection

 

Other investments

 

66

 

n/a

 

(1

)

1

 

(2

)

Credit default swaps — selling protection

 

Other investments

 

42

 

n/a

 

(2

)

1

 

(3

)

Other contracts

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other contracts

 

Other investments

 

13

 

n/a

 

 

 

 

Other contracts

 

Other assets

 

5

 

n/a

 

1

 

1

 

 

Total

 

 

 

$

2,366

 

21,871

 

$

452

 

$

549

 

$

(97

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total asset derivatives

 

 

 

$

2,586

 

21,871

 

$

436

 

$

552

 

$

(116

)

 


(1) Volume for OTC derivative contracts is represented by their notional amounts.  Volume for exchange traded derivatives is represented by the number of contracts, which is the basis on which they are traded.  (n/a = not applicable)

(2) In addition to the number of contracts presented in the table, the Company held 837,100 stock warrants.  Stock warrants can be converted to cash upon sale of those instruments or exercised for shares of common stock.

 

27



 

ALLSTATE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

 

 

 

Liability derivatives

 

 

 

 

 

Volume (1)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balance sheet location

 

Notional
amount

 

Number
of
contracts

 

Fair
value,
net

 

Gross
asset

 

Gross
liability

 

Derivatives designated as accounting hedging instruments

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest rate swap agreements

 

Other liabilities & accrued expenses

 

$

3,345

 

n/a

 

$

(181

)

$

20

 

$

(201

)

Interest rate swap agreements

 

Contractholder funds

 

 

n/a

 

2

 

2

 

 

Foreign currency swap agreements

 

Other liabilities & accrued expenses

 

138

 

n/a

 

(20

)

 

(20

)

Foreign currency and interest rate swap agreements

 

Other liabilities & accrued expenses

 

435

 

n/a

 

34

 

34

 

 

Foreign currency and interest rate swap agreements

 

Contractholder funds

 

 

n/a

 

28

 

28

 

 

Total

 

 

 

$

3,918

 

n/a

 

$

(137

)

$

84

 

$

(221

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Derivatives not designated as accounting hedging instruments

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest rate contracts

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest rate swap agreements

 

Other liabilities & accrued expenses

 

$

3,642

 

n/a

 

$

66

 

$

96

 

$

(30

)

Interest rate swaption agreements

 

Other liabilities & accrued expenses

 

750

 

n/a

 

4

 

4

 

 

Interest rate cap and floor agreements

 

Other liabilities & accrued expenses

 

3,216

 

n/a

 

(22

)

1

 

(23

)

Financial futures contracts and options

 

Other liabilities & accrued expenses

 

n/a

 

150

 

 

 

 

Equity and index contracts

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Options and futures

 

Other liabilities & accrued expenses

 

64

 

20,752

 

(168

)

2

 

(170

)

Embedded derivative financial instruments

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Guaranteed accumulation benefits

 

Contractholder funds

 

1,067

 

n/a

 

(88

)

 

(88

)

Guaranteed withdrawal benefits

 

Contractholder funds

 

739

 

n/a

 

(47

)

 

(47

)

Equity-indexed and forward starting options in life and annuity product contracts

 

Contractholder funds

 

4,694

 

n/a

 

(515

)

 

(515

)

Other embedded derivative financial instruments

 

Contractholder funds

 

85

 

n/a

 

(3

)

 

(3

)

Credit default contracts

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Credit default swaps — buying protection

 

Other liabilities & accrued expenses

 

181

 

n/a

 

(3

)

4

 

(7

)

Credit default swaps — selling protection

 

Other liabilities & accrued expenses

 

267

 

n/a

 

(61

)

1

 

(62

)

Total

 

 

 

$

14,705

 

20,902

 

$

(837

)

$

108

 

$

(945

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total liability derivatives

 

 

 

$

18,623

 

20,902

 

$

(974

)

$

192

 

$

(1,166

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total derivatives

 

 

 

$

21,209

 

42,773

 

$

(538

)

 

 

 

 

 


(1) Volume for OTC derivative contracts is represented by their notional amounts.  Volume for exchange traded derivatives is represented by the number of contracts, which is the basis on which they are traded.  (n/a = not applicable)

 

28



 

ALLSTATE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

 

The following table provides a summary of the impacts of the Company’s foreign currency contracts in cash flow hedging relationships in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations and the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Financial Position for the three months ended March 31.  Amortization of net losses from accumulated other comprehensive income related to cash flow hedges is expected to be $5 million during the next twelve months.

 

($ in millions)

 

2011

 

2010

 

Effective portion

 

 

 

 

 

(Loss) gain recognized in OCI on derivatives during the period

 

$

(8

)

$

6

 

Loss recognized in OCI on derivatives during the term of the hedging relationship

 

(26

)

(13

)

Gain reclassified from AOCI into income (net investment income)

 

1

 

1

 

Gain reclassified from AOCI into income (realized capital gains and losses)

 

 

 

Ineffective portion and amount excluded from effectiveness testing

 

 

 

 

 

Gain recognized in income on derivatives (realized capital gains and losses)

 

 

 

 

The following tables present gains and losses from valuation, settlements and hedge ineffectiveness reported on derivatives used in fair value hedging relationships and derivatives not designated as accounting hedging instruments in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three months ended March 31.

 

 

 

2011

 

($ in millions)

 

Net
investment
income

 

Realized
capital
gains and
losses

 

Contract
benefits

 

Interest
credited to
contractholder
funds

 

Total gain
(loss)
recognized
in net
income on
derivatives

 

Derivatives in fair value accounting hedging relationships

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest rate contracts

 

$

1

 

$

(8

)

$

 

$

(5

)

$

(12

)

Foreign currency and interest rate contracts

 

 

 

 

(32

)

(32

)

Subtotal

 

1

 

(8

)

 

(37

)

(44

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Derivatives not designated as accounting hedging instruments

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest rate contracts

 

 

2

 

 

 

2

 

Equity and index contracts

 

 

 

 

38

 

38

 

Embedded derivative financial instruments

 

 

(1

)

45

 

(22

)

22

 

Credit default contracts

 

 

11

 

 

 

11

 

Other contracts

 

 

 

 

2

 

2

 

Subtotal

 

 

12

 

45

 

18

 

75

 

Total

 

$

1

 

$

4

 

$

45

 

$

(19

)

$

31

 

 

29



 

ALLSTATE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

 

 

 

2010

 

 

 

Net
investment
income

 

Realized
capital
gains and
losses

 

Contract
benefits

 

Interest
credited to
contractholder
funds

 

Total gain
(loss)
recognized
in net
income on
derivatives

 

Derivatives in fair value accounting hedging relationships

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest rate contracts

 

$

(41

)

$

 

$

 

$

(1

)

$

(42

)

Foreign currency and interest rate contracts

 

 

 

 

(24

)

(24

)

Subtotal

 

(41

)

 

 

(25

)

(66

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Derivatives not designated as accounting hedging instruments

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest rate contracts

 

 

(32

)

 

 

(32

)

Equity and index contracts

 

 

 

 

34

 

34

 

Embedded derivative financial instruments

 

 

(5

)

20

 

(2

)

13

 

Foreign currency contracts

 

 

4

 

 

 

4

 

Credit default contracts

 

 

(2

)

 

 

(2

)

Subtotal

 

 

(35

)

20

 

32

 

17

 

Total

 

$

(41

)

$

(35

)

$

20

 

$

7

 

$

(49

)

 

The following tables provide a summary of the changes in fair value of the Company’s fair value hedging relationships in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three months ended March 31.

 

($ in millions)

 

 

 

2011

 

 

 

Gain (loss) on derivatives

 

Gain (loss) on hedged risk

 

Location of gain or (loss) recognized
in net income on derivatives

 

Interest
rate
contracts

 

Foreign
currency &
interest rate
contracts

 

Contractholder
funds

 

Investments

 

Interest credited to contractholder funds

 

$

(7

)

$

(34

)

$

41

 

$

 

Net investment income

 

21

 

 

 

(21

)

Realized capital gains and losses

 

(8

)

 

 

 

Total

 

$

6

 

$

(34

)

$

41

 

$

(21

)

 

 

 

2010

 

 

 

Gain (loss) on derivatives

 

Gain (loss) on hedged risk

 

Location of gain or (loss) recognized
in net income on derivatives

 

Interest
rate
contracts

 

Foreign
currency &
interest rate
contracts

 

Contractholder
funds

 

Investments

 

Interest credited to contractholder funds

 

$

(1

)

$

(33

)

$

34

 

$

 

Net investment income

 

(13

)

 

 

13

 

Total

 

$

(14

)

$

(33

)

$

34

 

$

13

 

 

The Company manages its exposure to credit risk by utilizing highly rated counterparties, establishing risk control limits, executing legally enforceable master netting agreements (“MNAs”) and obtaining collateral where appropriate.  The Company uses MNAs for OTC derivative transactions, including interest rate swap, foreign currency swap, interest rate cap, interest rate floor, credit default swap, forward and certain option agreements (including swaptions).  These agreements permit either party to net payments due for transactions covered by the agreements.  Under the provisions of the agreements, collateral is either pledged or obtained when certain predetermined exposure limits are exceeded.  As of March 31, 2011, counterparties pledged $102 million in securities to the Company, and the Company pledged $77 million in securities to counterparties which includes $69 million of collateral posted under MNAs for contracts containing credit-risk-contingent provisions that are in a liability position and $8 million of collateral posted under MNAs for contracts without credit-risk-contingent liabilities.  The Company has not incurred any losses on derivative financial instruments due to counterparty nonperformance.  Other derivatives, including futures and certain option contracts, are traded on organized exchanges, which require margin deposits and guarantee the execution of trades, thereby mitigating any potential credit risk.

 

30



 

ALLSTATE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

 

Counterparty credit exposure represents the Company’s potential loss if all of the counterparties concurrently fail to perform under the contractual terms of the contracts and all collateral, if any, becomes worthless.  This exposure is measured by the fair value of OTC derivative contracts with a positive fair value at the reporting date reduced by the effect, if any, of legally enforceable master netting agreements.

 

The following table summarizes the counterparty credit exposure by counterparty credit rating as it relates to interest rate swap, foreign currency swap, interest rate cap, interest rate floor, free-standing credit default swap, forward and certain option agreements (including swaptions).

 

($ in millions)

 

 

 

March 31, 2011

 

December 31, 2010

 

Rating (1)

 

Number
of
counter-
parties

 

Notional
amount

 

Credit
exposure
(2)

 

Exposure,
net of
collateral
(2)

 

Number
of
counter-
parties

 

Notional
amount

 

Credit
exposure
(2)

 

Exposure,
net of
collateral
(2)

 

AA-

 

1

 

$

622

 

$

19

 

$

 

1

 

$

675

 

$

19

 

$

10

 

A+

 

2

 

3,389

 

37

 

 

2

 

951

 

14

 

10

 

A

 

4

 

4,034

 

45

 

3

 

3

 

772

 

10

 

10

 

A-

 

 

 

 

 

1

 

89

 

32

 

32

 

BBB+

 

1

 

5

 

33

 

33

 

 

 

 

 

Total

 

8

 

$

8,050

 

$

134

 

$

36

 

7

 

$

2,487

 

$

75

 

$

62

 

 


(1)             Rating is the lower of S&P or Moody’s ratings.

(2)             Only OTC derivatives with a net positive fair value are included for each counterparty.

 

Market risk is the risk that the Company will incur losses due to adverse changes in market rates and prices.  Market risk exists for all of the derivative financial instruments the Company currently holds, as these instruments may become less valuable due to adverse changes in market conditions.  To limit this risk, the Company’s senior management has established risk control limits.  In addition, changes in fair value of the derivative financial instruments that the Company uses for risk management purposes are generally offset by the change in the fair value or cash flows of the hedged risk component of the related assets, liabilities or forecasted transactions.

 

Certain of the Company’s derivative instruments contain credit-risk-contingent termination events, cross-default provisions and credit support annex agreements.  Credit-risk-contingent termination events allow the counterparties to terminate the derivative on certain dates if ALIC’s or Allstate Life Insurance Company of New York’s (“ALNY”) financial strength credit ratings by Moody’s or S&P fall below a certain level or in the event ALIC or ALNY are no longer rated by both Moody’s and S&P.  Credit-risk-contingent cross-default provisions allow the counterparties to terminate the derivative instruments if the Company defaults by pre-determined threshold amounts on certain debt instruments.  Credit-risk-contingent credit support annex agreements specify the amount of collateral the Company must post to counterparties based on ALIC’s or ALNY’s financial strength credit ratings by Moody’s or S&P, or in the event ALIC or ALNY are no longer rated by both Moody’s and S&P.

 

The following summarizes the fair value of derivative instruments with termination, cross-default or collateral credit-risk-contingent features that are in a liability position, as well as the fair value of assets and collateral that are netted against the liability in accordance with provisions within legally enforceable MNAs.

 

($ in millions)

 

March 31,
2011

 

December 31,
2010

 

Gross liability fair value of contracts containing credit-risk-contingent features

 

$

158

 

$

368

 

Gross asset fair value of contracts containing credit-risk-contingent features and subject to MNAs

 

(87

)

(212

)

Collateral posted under MNAs for contracts containing credit-risk-contingent features

 

(69

)

(147

)

Maximum amount of additional exposure for contracts with credit-risk-contingent features if all features were triggered concurrently

 

$

2

 

$

9

 

 

Credit derivatives - selling protection

 

Free-standing credit default swaps (“CDS”) are utilized for selling credit protection against a specified credit event.  A credit default swap is a derivative instrument, representing an agreement between two parties to exchange the credit risk of a specified entity (or a group of entities), or an index based on the credit risk of a group of entities (all commonly referred to as the “reference entity” or a portfolio of “reference entities”), in return for a periodic

 

31



 

ALLSTATE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

 

premium.  In selling protection, CDS are used to replicate fixed income securities and to complement the cash market when credit exposure to certain issuers is not available or when the derivative alternative is less expensive than the cash market alternative.  CDS typically have a five-year term.

 

The following table shows the CDS notional amounts by credit rating and fair value of protection sold as of March 31, 2011:

 

 

 

Notional amount

 

 

 

($ in millions)

 

AA

 

A

 

BBB

 

BB and
lower

 

Total

 

Fair
value

 

Single name

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Investment grade corporate debt

 

$

40

 

$

55

 

$

10

 

$

10

 

$

115

 

$

 

High yield debt

 

 

 

 

2

 

2

 

 

Municipal

 

25

 

 

 

 

25

 

(4

)

Subtotal

 

65

 

55

 

10

 

12

 

142

 

(4

)

Baskets

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Tranche

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Investment grade corporate debt

 

 

 

 

65

 

65

 

(16

)

First-to-default

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Municipal

 

 

100

 

 

 

100

 

(30

)

Subtotal

 

 

100

 

 

65

 

165

 

(46

)

Total

 

$

65

 

$

155

 

$

10

 

$

77

 

$

307

 

$

(50

)

 

The following table shows the CDS notional amounts by credit rating and fair value of protection sold as of December 31, 2010:

 

 

 

Notional amount

 

 

 

($ in millions)

 

AA

 

A

 

BBB

 

BB and
lower

 

Total

 

Fair
value

 

Single name

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Investment grade corporate debt

 

$

40

 

$

55

 

$

10

 

$

10

 

$

115

 

$

(1

)

High yield debt

 

 

 

 

4

 

4

 

 

Municipal

 

25

 

 

 

 

25

 

(6

)

Subtotal

 

65

 

55

 

10

 

14

 

144

 

(7

)

Baskets

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Tranche

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Investment grade corporate debt

 

 

 

 

65

 

65

 

(19

)

First-to-default

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Municipal

 

 

100

 

 

 

100

 

(37

)

Subtotal

 

 

100

 

 

65

 

165

 

(56

)

Total

 

$

65

 

$

155

 

$

10

 

$

79

 

$

309

 

$

(63

)

 

In selling protection with CDS, the Company sells credit protection on an identified single name, a basket of names in a first-to-default (“FTD”) structure or a specific tranche of a basket, or credit derivative index (“CDX”) that is generally investment grade, and in return receives periodic premiums through expiration or termination of the agreement.  With single name CDS, this premium or credit spread generally corresponds to the difference between the yield on the reference entity’s public fixed maturity cash instruments and swap rates at the time the agreement is executed.  With a FTD basket or a tranche of a basket, because of the additional credit risk inherent in a basket of named reference entities, the premium generally corresponds to a high proportion of the sum of the credit spreads of the names in the basket and the correlation between the names.  CDX index is utilized to take a position on multiple (generally 125) reference entities.  Credit events are typically defined as bankruptcy, failure to pay, or restructuring, depending on the nature of the reference entities.  If a credit event occurs, the Company settles with the

 

32



 

ALLSTATE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

 

counterparty, either through physical settlement or cash settlement.  In a physical settlement, a reference asset is delivered by the buyer of protection to the Company, in exchange for cash payment at par, whereas in a cash settlement, the Company pays the difference between par and the prescribed value of the reference asset.  When a credit event occurs in a single name or FTD basket (for FTD, the first credit event occurring for any one name in the basket), the contract terminates at the time of settlement.  When a credit event occurs in a tranche of a basket, there is no immediate impact to the Company until cumulative losses in the basket exceed the contractual subordination.  To date, realized losses have not exceeded the subordination.  For CDX index, the reference entity’s name incurring the credit event is removed from the index while the contract continues until expiration.  The maximum payout on a CDS is the contract notional amount.  A physical settlement may afford the Company with recovery rights as the new owner of the asset.

 

The Company monitors risk associated with credit derivatives through individual name credit limits at both a credit derivative and a combined cash instrument/credit derivative level.  The ratings of individual names for which protection has been sold are also monitored.

 

In addition to the CDS described above, the Company’s synthetic collateralized debt obligations contain embedded credit default swaps which sell protection on a basket of reference entities.  The synthetic collateralized debt obligations are fully funded; therefore, the Company is not obligated to contribute additional funds when credit events occur related to the reference entities named in the embedded credit default swaps.  The Company’s maximum amount at risk equals the amount of its aggregate initial investment in the synthetic collateralized debt obligations.

 

7.              Reinsurance

 

The effects of reinsurance on premiums and contract charges for the three months ended March 31 are as follows:

 

($ in millions)

 

2011

 

2010

 

Direct

 

$

573

 

$

551

 

Assumed

 

 

 

 

 

Affiliate

 

28

 

27

 

Non-affiliate

 

5

 

5

 

Ceded—non-affiliate

 

(188

)

(184

)

Premiums and contract charges, net of reinsurance

 

$

418

 

$

399

 

 

The effects of reinsurance on contract benefits for the three months ended March 31 are as follows:

 

($ in millions)

 

2011

 

2010

 

Direct

 

$

436

 

$

468

 

Assumed

 

 

 

 

 

Affiliate

 

20

 

17

 

Non-affiliate

 

4

 

4

 

Ceded—non-affiliate

 

(78

)

(125

)

Contract benefits, net of reinsurance

 

$

382

 

$

364

 

 

The effects of reinsurance on interest credited to contractholder funds for the three months ended March 31 are as follows:

 

($ in millions)

 

2011

 

2010

 

Direct

 

$

410

 

$

454

 

Assumed

 

 

 

 

 

Affiliate

 

3

 

2

 

Non-affiliate

 

3

 

3

 

Ceded—non-affiliate

 

(8

)

(7

)

Interest credited to contractholder funds, net of reinsurance

 

$

408

 

$

452

 

 

33



 

ALLSTATE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

 

8.              Guarantees and Contingent Liabilities

 

Guaranty funds

 

Under state insurance guaranty fund laws, insurers doing business in a state can be assessed, up to prescribed limits, for certain obligations of insolvent insurance companies to policyholders and claimants.  Amounts assessed to each company are typically related to its proportion of business written in each state.  The Company’s policy is to accrue assessments when the entity for which the insolvency relates has met its state of domicile’s statutory definition of insolvency and the amount of the loss is reasonably estimable.  In most states, the definition is met with a declaration of financial insolvency by a court of competent jurisdiction.  In certain states there must also be a final order of liquidation.

 

The New York Liquidation Bureau (the “Bureau”) has publicly reported that Executive Life Insurance Company of New York (“Executive Life”) is currently under its jurisdiction as part of a 1992 court-ordered rehabilitation plan. At this time, Executive Life continues to fully pay claims when due.  An Order to Show Cause dated December 17, 2010 from the New York Supreme Court mandates that the Bureau, Life Insurance Corporation of New York (“LICNY”) and other interested parties provide a proposed plan of liquidation by July 1, 2011; otherwise, the Superintendent of the New York State Insurance Department will be required to do so by August 1, 2011.  A public hearing on the proposed plan of liquidation is now scheduled for January 4, 2012.  The current publicly available estimated shortfall from the Bureau is $1.27 billion.

 

If Executive Life were to be declared insolvent in the future, it is reasonably possible that the Company will have exposure to future guaranty fund assessments.  The Company’s exposure will ultimately depend on the level of guaranty fund system participation.  New York law currently contains an aggregate limit on guaranty funds under LICNY of $500 million, of which approximately $40 million has been used.  Under current law, the Company may be allowed to recoup a portion of the amount of any additional guaranty fund assessment in periods subsequent to the recognition of the assessment by offsetting future premium taxes.  The Company’s three-year average market share for New York as of December 31, 2009, based on assessable premiums, was approximately 2.2%.

 

Guarantees

 

The Company owns certain fixed income securities that obligate the Company to exchange credit risk or to forfeit principal due, depending on the nature or occurrence of specified credit events for the reference entities.  In the event all such specified credit events were to occur, the Company’s maximum amount at risk on these fixed income securities, as measured by the amount of the aggregate initial investment, was $67 million as of March 31, 2011.  The obligations associated with these fixed income securities expire at various dates on or before March 11, 2018.

 

Related to the disposal through reinsurance of substantially all of the Company’s variable annuity business to Prudential in 2006, the Company and the Corporation have agreed to indemnify Prudential for certain pre-closing contingent liabilities (including extra-contractual liabilities of the Company and liabilities specifically excluded from the transaction) that the Company has agreed to retain.  In addition, the Company and the Corporation will each indemnify Prudential for certain post-closing liabilities that may arise from the acts of the Company and its agents, including in connection with the Company’s provision of transition services.  The reinsurance agreements contain no limitations or indemnifications with regard to insurance risk transfer, and transferred all of the future risks and responsibilities for performance on the underlying variable annuity contracts to Prudential, including those related to benefit guarantees.  Management does not believe this agreement will have a material adverse effect on results of operations, cash flows or financial position of the Company.

 

In the normal course of business, the Company provides standard indemnifications to contractual counterparties in connection with numerous transactions, including acquisitions and divestitures.  The types of indemnifications typically provided include indemnifications for breaches of representations and warranties, taxes and certain other liabilities, such as third party lawsuits.  The indemnification clauses are often standard contractual terms and are entered into in the normal course of business based on an assessment that the risk of loss would be remote.  The terms of the indemnifications vary in duration and nature.  In many cases, the maximum obligation is not explicitly stated and the contingencies triggering the obligation to indemnify have not occurred and are not expected to occur.  Consequently, the maximum amount of the obligation under such indemnifications is not determinable.  Historically, the Company has not made any material payments pursuant to these obligations.

 

The aggregate liability balance related to all guarantees was not material as of March 31, 2011.

 

34


 


 

ALLSTATE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

 

Regulation and Compliance

 

The Company is subject to changing social, economic and regulatory conditions.  From time to time, regulatory authorities or legislative bodies seek to impose additional regulations regarding agent and broker compensation, regulate the nature of and amount of investments, and otherwise expand overall regulation of insurance products and the insurance industry.  The Company has established procedures and policies to facilitate compliance with laws and regulations, to foster prudent business operations, and to support financial reporting.  The Company routinely reviews its practices to validate compliance with laws and regulations and with internal procedures and policies.  As a result of these reviews, from time to time the Company may decide to modify some of its procedures and policies.  Such modifications, and the reviews that led to them, may be accompanied by payments being made and costs being incurred.  The ultimate changes and eventual effects of these actions on the Company’s business, if any, are uncertain.

 

Legal and regulatory proceedings and inquiries

 

Background

 

The Company and certain affiliates are involved in a number of lawsuits, regulatory inquiries, and other legal proceedings arising out of various aspects of its business.  As background to the “Proceedings” subsection below, please note the following:

 

·      These matters raise difficult and complicated factual and legal issues and are subject to many uncertainties and complexities, including the underlying facts of each matter; novel legal issues; variations between jurisdictions in which matters are being litigated, heard, or investigated; differences in applicable laws and judicial interpretations; the length of time before many of these matters might be resolved by settlement, through litigation, or otherwise; the fact that some of the lawsuits are putative class actions in which a class has not been certified and in which the purported class may not be clearly defined; the fact that some of the lawsuits involve multi-state class actions in which the applicable law(s) for the claims at issue is in dispute and therefore unclear; and the current challenging legal environment faced by large corporations and insurance companies.

 

·      The outcome of these matters may be affected by decisions, verdicts, and settlements, and the timing of such decisions, verdicts, and settlements, in other individual and class action lawsuits that involve the Company, other insurers, or other entities and by other legal, governmental, and regulatory actions that involve the Company, other insurers, or other entities.  The outcome may also be affected by future state or federal legislation, the timing or substance of which cannot be predicted.

 

·      In the lawsuits, plaintiffs seek a variety of remedies which may include equitable relief in the form of injunctive and other remedies and monetary relief in the form of contractual and extra-contractual damages.  In some cases, the monetary damages sought may include punitive or treble damages.  Often specific information about the relief sought, such as the amount of damages, is not available because plaintiffs have not requested specific relief in their pleadings.  When specific monetary demands are made, they are often set just below a state court jurisdictional limit in order to seek the maximum amount available in state court, regardless of the specifics of the case, while still avoiding the risk of removal to federal court.  In the Company’s experience, monetary demands in pleadings bear little relation to the ultimate loss, if any, to the Company.

 

·      In connection with regulatory examinations and proceedings, government authorities may seek various forms of relief, including penalties, restitution, and changes in business practices.  The Company may not be advised of the nature and extent of relief sought until the final stages of the examination or proceeding.

 

·      For the reasons specified above, it is not possible to make meaningful estimates of the amount or range of loss that could result from the matters described below in the “Proceedings” subsection.  The Company reviews these matters on an ongoing basis and follows appropriate accounting guidance when making accrual and disclosure decisions.  When assessing reasonably possible and probable outcomes, the Company bases its decisions on its assessment of the ultimate outcome following all appeals.

 

·      Due to the complexity and scope of the matters disclosed in the “Proceedings” subsection below and the many uncertainties that exist, the ultimate outcome of these matters cannot be reasonably predicted.  In the

 

35



 

ALLSTATE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

 

event of an unfavorable outcome in one or more of these matters, the ultimate liability may be in excess of amounts currently reserved, if any, and may be material to the Company’s operating results or cash flows for a particular quarterly or annual period.  However, based on information currently known to it, management believes that the ultimate outcome of all matters described below, as they are resolved over time, is not likely to have a material adverse effect on the financial position of the Company.

 

Proceedings

 

Legal proceedings involving Allstate agencies and AIC may impact the Company, even when the Company is not directly involved, because the Company sells its products through a variety of distribution channels including Allstate agencies.  Consequently, information about the more significant of these proceedings is provided in the following paragraph.

 

AIC is defending certain matters relating to its agency program reorganization announced in 1999.  These matters are in various stages of development.

 

·   These matters include a lawsuit filed in 2001 by the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (“EEOC”) alleging retaliation under federal civil rights laws (the “EEOC I” suit) and a class action filed in 2001 by former employee agents alleging retaliation and age discrimination under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (“ADEA”), breach of contract and ERISA violations (the “Romero I” suit).  In 2004, in the consolidated EEOC I and Romero I litigation, the trial court issued a memorandum and order that, among other things, certified classes of agents, including a mandatory class of agents who had signed a release, for purposes of effecting the court’s declaratory judgment that the release is voidable at the option of the release signer.  The court also ordered that an agent who voids the release must return to AIC “any and all benefits received by the [agent] in exchange for signing the release.”  The court also stated that, “on the undisputed facts of record, there is no basis for claims of age discrimination.”  The EEOC and plaintiffs asked the court to clarify and/or reconsider its memorandum and order and in January 2007, the judge denied their request.  In June 2007, the court granted AIC’s motions for summary judgment.  Following plaintiffs’ filing of a notice of appeal, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit (“Third Circuit”) issued an order in December 2007 stating that the notice of appeal was not taken from a final order within the meaning of the federal law and thus not appealable at this time.  In March 2008, the Third Circuit decided that the appeal should not summarily be dismissed and that the question of whether the matter is appealable at this time will be addressed by the Third Circuit along with the merits of the appeal.  In July 2009, the Third Circuit vacated the decision which granted AIC’s summary judgment motions, remanded the cases to the trial court for additional discovery, and directed that the cases be reassigned to another trial court judge.  In January 2010, the cases were assigned to a new judge for further proceedings in the trial court.

 

·   A putative nationwide class action has also been filed by former employee agents alleging various violations of ERISA, including a worker classification issue.  These plaintiffs are challenging certain amendments to the Agents Pension Plan and are seeking to have exclusive agent independent contractors treated as employees for benefit purposes.  This matter was dismissed with prejudice by the trial court, was the subject of further proceedings on appeal, and was reversed and remanded to the trial court in 2005.  In June 2007, the court granted AIC’s motion to dismiss the case.  Following plaintiffs’ filing of a notice of appeal, the Third Circuit issued an order in December 2007 stating that the notice of appeal was not taken from a final order within the meaning of the federal law and thus not appealable at this time.  In March 2008, the Third Circuit decided that the appeal should not summarily be dismissed and that the question of whether the matter is appealable at this time will be addressed by the Third Circuit along with the merits of the appeal.  In July 2009, the Third Circuit vacated the decision which granted AIC’s motion to dismiss the case, remanded the case to the trial court for additional discovery, and directed that the case be reassigned to another trial court judge.  In January 2010, the case was assigned to a new judge for further proceedings in the trial court.

 

In these agency program reorganization matters, plaintiffs seek compensatory and punitive damages, and equitable relief.  AIC has been vigorously defending these lawsuits and other matters related to its agency program reorganization.

 

36



 

ALLSTATE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

 

Other Matters

 

Various other legal, governmental, and regulatory actions, including state market conduct exams, and other governmental and regulatory inquiries are pending from time to time that involve the Company and specific aspects of its conduct of business.  Like other members of the insurance industry, the Company is the target of a number of class action lawsuits and other types of proceedings, some of which involve claims for substantial or indeterminate amounts.  These actions are based on a variety of issues and target a range of the Company’s practices.  The outcome of these disputes is currently unpredictable.

 

One or more of these matters could have an adverse effect on the Company’s operating results or cash flows for a particular quarterly or annual period.  However, based on information currently known to it, management believes that the ultimate outcome of all matters described in this “Other Matters” subsection, in excess of amounts currently reserved, if any, as they are resolved over time, is not likely to have a material effect on the operating results, cash flows or financial position of the Company.

 

9.              Other Comprehensive Income

 

The components of other comprehensive income on a pre-tax and after-tax basis for the three months ended March 31 are as follows:

 

 

 

2011

 

2010

 

($ in millions)

 

Pre-tax

 

 Tax

 

After-
tax

 

Pre-tax

 

 Tax

 

After-
tax

 

Unrealized holding gains and losses arising during the period, net of related offsets

 

$

222

 

$

(78

)

$

144

 

$

723

 

$

(253

)

$

470

 

Less: reclassification adjustment of realized capital gains and losses

 

29

 

(10

)

19

 

(90

)

32

 

(58

)

Unrealized net capital gains and losses

 

193

 

(68

)

125

 

813

 

(285

)

528

 

Other comprehensive income

 

$

193

 

$

(68

)

125

 

$

813

 

$

(285

)

528

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income (loss)

 

 

 

 

 

87

 

 

 

 

 

(18

)

Comprehensive income

 

 

 

 

 

$

212

 

 

 

 

 

$

510

 

 

37



 

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

 

To the Board of Directors and Shareholder of

Allstate Life Insurance Company

Northbrook, IL 60062

 

We have reviewed the accompanying condensed consolidated statement of financial position of Allstate Life Insurance Company and subsidiaries (the “Company”), an affiliate of The Allstate Corporation, as of March 31, 2011, and the related condensed consolidated statements of operations for the three-month periods ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, and the condensed consolidated statements of cash flows for the three-month periods ended March 31, 2011 and 2010.  These interim financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management.

 

We conducted our reviews in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States).  A review of interim financial information consists principally of applying analytical procedures and making inquiries of persons responsible for financial and accounting matters.  It is substantially less in scope than an audit conducted in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the objective of which is the expression of an opinion regarding the financial statements taken as a whole.  Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion.

 

Based on our reviews, we are not aware of any material modifications that should be made to such condensed consolidated interim financial statements for them to be in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

 

We have previously audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated statement of financial position of Allstate Life Insurance Company and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2010, and the related consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income, shareholder’s equity, and cash flows for the year then ended (not presented herein); and in our report dated March 11, 2011, we expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements.  In our opinion, the information set forth in the accompanying condensed consolidated statement of financial position as of December 31, 2010 is fairly stated, in all material respects, in relation to the consolidated statement of financial position from which it has been derived.

 

 

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP

 

Chicago, Illinois

May 4, 2011

 

38



 

Item 2.           MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS FOR THE THREE-MONTH PERIODS ENDED MARCH 31, 2011 AND 2010

 

OVERVIEW

 

The following discussion highlights significant factors influencing the consolidated financial position and results of operations of Allstate Life Insurance Company (referred to in this document as “we”, “our”, “us”, or the “Company”).  It should be read in conjunction with the condensed consolidated financial statements and notes thereto found under Part I. Item 1. contained herein, and with the discussion, analysis, consolidated financial statements and notes thereto in Part I. Item 1. and Part II. Item 7. and Item 8. of the Allstate Life Insurance Company Annual Report on Form 10-K for 2010.  We operate as a single segment entity based on the manner in which we use financial information to evaluate business performance and to determine the allocation of resources.

 

OPERATIONS HIGHLIGHTS

 

·                  Net income was $87 million in the first quarter of 2011 compared to a net loss of $18 million in the first quarter of 2010.

·                  Premiums and contract charges on underwritten products, including traditional life, interest-sensitive life and accident and health insurance, totaled $366 million in 2011, an increase of 1.9% or $7 million from $359 million in 2010.

·                  During the first quarter of 2011, a $12 million pre-tax charge to income was recorded related to our annual comprehensive review of the deferred policy acquisition costs (“DAC”), deferred sales inducement costs (“DSI”) and secondary guarantee liability balances and assumptions for our interest-sensitive life, fixed annuities and other investment contracts.  This compares to a $13 million pre-tax credit to income in the first quarter of 2010.

·                  Net realized capital gains totaled $45 million in the first quarter of 2011 compared to net realized capital losses of $161 million in the first quarter of 2010.

·                  Investments as of March 31, 2011 totaled $58.51 billion, reflecting a decrease in carrying value of $935 million from $59.44 billion as of December 31, 2010.  Net investment income decreased 6.4% to $662 million in the first quarter of 2011 from $707 million in the first quarter of 2010.

·                  Contractholder funds as of March 31, 2011 totaled $45.15 billion, reflecting decreases of $1.31 billion from $46.46 billion as of December 31, 2010 and $4.13 billion from $49.28 billion as of March 31, 2010.

 

OPERATIONS

 

Summary analysis  Summarized financial data is presented in the following table.

 

 

 

Three months ended
March 31,

 

($ in millions)

 

2011

 

2010

 

Revenues

 

 

 

 

 

Premiums

 

$

171

 

$

153

 

Contract charges

 

247

 

246

 

Net investment income

 

662

 

707

 

Realized capital gains and losses

 

45

 

(161

)

Total revenues

 

1,125

 

945

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Costs and expenses

 

 

 

 

 

Contract benefits

 

(382

)

(364

)

Interest credited to contractholder funds

 

(408

)

(452

)

Amortization of DAC

 

(124

)

(67

)

Operating costs and expenses

 

(77

)

(86

)

Restructuring and related charges

 

2

 

 

Interest expense

 

(11

)

(11

)

Total costs and expenses

 

(1,000

)

(980

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Gain on disposition of operations

 

2

 

1

 

Income tax (expense) benefit

 

(40

)

16

 

Net income (loss)

 

$

87

 

$

(18

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Investments as of March 31

 

$

58,507

 

$

60,282

 

 

39



 

Net income in the first quarter of 2011 was $87 million compared to a net loss of $18 million in the first quarter of 2010.  The favorable change of $105 million was primarily due to net realized capital gains in the current year compared to net realized capital losses in the prior year, decreased interest credited to contractholder funds and higher premiums and contract charges, partially offset by higher amortization of DAC and lower net investment income.

 

Analysis of revenues  Total revenues increased 19.0% or $180 million in the first quarter of 2011 compared to the first quarter of 2010 due to net realized capital gains in the current year compared to net realized capital losses in the prior year and higher premiums and contract charges, partially offset by lower net investment income.

 

Premiums represent revenues generated from traditional life insurance, immediate annuities with life contingencies, and accident and health and insurance products that have significant mortality or morbidity risk.

 

Contract charges are revenues generated from interest-sensitive and variable life insurance and fixed annuities for which deposits are classified as contractholder funds or separate account liabilities.  Contract charges are assessed against the contractholder account values for maintenance, administration, cost of insurance and surrender prior to contractually specified dates.

 

 The following table summarizes premiums and contract charges by product.

 

 

 

Three months ended
March 31,

 

($ in millions)

 

2011

 

2010

 

Underwritten products

 

 

 

 

 

Traditional life insurance premiums

 

$

104

 

$

102

 

Accident and health insurance premiums

 

24

 

24

 

Interest-sensitive life insurance contract charges

 

238

 

233

 

Subtotal

 

366

 

359

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Annuities

 

 

 

 

 

Immediate annuities with life contingencies premiums

 

43

 

27

 

Other fixed annuity contract charges

 

9

 

13

 

Subtotal

 

52

 

40

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Premiums and contract charges (1)

 

$

418

 

$

399

 

 


(1)             Contract charges related to the cost of insurance totaled $160 million and $153 million, for the first quarter of 2011 and 2010, respectively.

 

Total premiums and contract charges increased 4.8% in the first quarter of 2011 compared to the first quarter of 2010 primarily due to higher sales of immediate annuities with life contingencies due to more competitive pricing and higher contract charges on interest-sensitive life insurance products resulting from a shift in the mix of policies in force to contracts with higher cost of insurance rates.

 

40



 

Contractholder funds represent interest-bearing liabilities arising from the sale of individual and institutional products, such as interest-sensitive life insurance, fixed annuities and funding agreements.  The balance of contractholder funds is equal to the cumulative deposits received and interest credited to the contractholder less cumulative contract maturities, benefits, surrenders, withdrawals and contract charges for mortality or administrative expenses.  The following table shows the changes in contractholder funds.

 

 

 

Three months ended
March 31,

 

($ in millions)

 

2011

 

2010

 

Contractholder funds, beginning balance

 

$

46,458

 

$

50,850

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Deposits

 

 

 

 

 

Fixed annuities

 

164

 

291

 

Interest-sensitive life insurance

 

308

 

374

 

Total deposits

 

472

 

665

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest credited

 

400

 

451

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Maturities, benefits, withdrawals and other adjustments

 

 

 

 

 

Maturities and retirements of institutional products

 

(487

)

(954

)

Benefits

 

(370

)

(391

)

Surrenders and partial withdrawals

 

(1,015

)

(994

)

Contract charges

 

(235

)

(226

)

Net transfers from separate accounts

 

3

 

2

 

Fair value hedge adjustments for institutional products

 

(34

)

(123

)

Other adjustments (1)

 

(44

)

1

 

Total maturities, benefits, withdrawals and other adjustments

 

(2,182

)

(2,685

)

Contractholder funds, ending balance

 

$

45,148

 

$

49,281

 

 


(1)             The table above illustrates the changes in contractholder funds, which are presented gross of reinsurance recoverables on the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Financial Position.  The table above is intended to supplement our discussion and analysis of revenues, which are presented net of reinsurance on the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations.  As a result, the net change in contractholder funds associated with products reinsured to third parties is reflected as a component of the other adjustments line.

 

Contractholder funds decreased 2.8% and 3.1% in the first quarter of 2011 and 2010, respectively.  Average contractholder funds decreased 8.5% in the first quarter of 2011 compared to the same period of 2010.

 

Contractholder deposits decreased 29.0% in the first quarter of 2011 compared to the same period of 2010 primarily due to lower deposits on fixed annuities.  Deposits on fixed annuities decreased 43.6% in the first quarter of 2011 compared to the same period of 2010 due to our decision to discontinue distributing fixed annuities through banks and broker dealers in the first quarter of 2010 and our goal to reduce our concentration in spread based products and improve returns on new business.

 

Maturities and retirements of institutional products decreased 49.0% to $487 million in the first quarter of 2011 from $954 million in the same period of 2010.

 

Surrenders and partial withdrawals on deferred fixed annuities and interest-sensitive life insurance products increased 2.1% to $1.02 billion in the first quarter of 2011 from $994 million in the same period of 2010 primarily due to higher surrenders and partial withdrawals on fixed annuities, partially offset by lower surrenders and partial withdrawals on interest-sensitive life insurance products.  The annualized surrender and partial withdrawal rate on deferred fixed annuities and interest-sensitive life insurance products, based on the beginning of year contractholder funds, was 10.5% in the first quarter of 2011 compared to 9.7% in the same period of 2010.

 

Analysis of costs and expenses  Total costs and expenses increased 2.0% or $20 million in the first quarter of 2011 compared to the same period of 2010 primarily due to higher amortization of DAC and contract benefits, partially offset by lower interest credited to contractholder funds and operating costs and expenses.

 

Contract benefits increased 4.9% or $18 million in the first quarter of 2011 compared to the same period of 2010 primarily due to higher contract benefits on immediate annuities with life contingencies, reflecting the increase in premiums on these products.

 

41



 

We analyze our mortality and morbidity results using the difference between premiums and contract charges earned for the cost of insurance and contract benefits excluding the portion related to the implied interest on immediate annuities with life contingencies (“benefit spread”).  This implied interest totaled $135 million and $139 million in the first quarter of 2011 and 2010, respectively.

 

The benefit spread by product group is disclosed in the following table.

 

 

 

Three months ended
March 31,

 

($ in millions) 

 

2011

 

2010

 

Life insurance

 

$

90

 

$

83

 

Accident and health insurance

 

6

 

8

 

Annuities

 

(12

)

(10

)

Total benefit spread

 

$

84

 

$

81

 

 

Benefit spread increased 3.7% or $3 million in the first quarter of 2011 compared to the same period of 2010.  The increase was primarily due to increased cost of insurance contract charges on interest-sensitive life insurance products.

 

Interest credited to contractholder funds decreased 9.7% or $44 million in the first quarter of 2011 compared to the same period of 2010 primarily due to lower average contractholder funds and lower interest crediting rates on interest-sensitive life insurance and immediate fixed annuities.  Additionally, valuation changes on derivatives embedded in equity-indexed annuity contracts that are not hedged decreased interest credited to contractholder funds by $12 million in the first quarter of 2011.

 

Amortization of DSI in the first quarter of 2011 was $10 million compared to $5 million in the same period of 2010.  The increase was primarily due to higher amortization resulting from realized capital gains on sales of fixed income securities in 2011.

 

In order to analyze the impact of net investment income and interest credited to contractholders on net income, we monitor the difference between net investment income and the sum of interest credited to contractholder funds and the implied interest on immediate annuities with life contingencies, which is included as a component of contract benefits on the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations (“investment spread”).

 

The investment spread by product group is shown in the following table.

 

 

 

Three months ended
March 31,

 

($ in millions) 

 

2011

 

2010

 

Annuities and institutional products

 

$

48

 

$

50

 

Life insurance

 

13

 

7

 

Accident and health insurance

 

2

 

2

 

Net investment income on investments supporting capital

 

56

 

57

 

Total investment spread

 

$

119

 

$

116

 

 

Investment spread increased 2.6% or $3 million in the first quarter of 2011 compared to the same period of 2010 primarily due to decreased interest credited to contractholder funds, partially offset by lower net investment income.

 

42



 

To further analyze investment spreads, the following table summarizes the weighted average investment yield on assets supporting product liabilities and capital, interest crediting rates and investment spreads for the three months ended March 31.

 

 

 

Weighted average
investment yield

 

Weighted average
interest crediting rate

 

Weighted average
investment spreads

 

 

 

2011

 

2010

 

2011

 

2010

 

2011

 

2010

 

Interest-sensitive life insurance

 

5.4

%

5.5

%

4.2

%

4.5

%

1.2

%

1.0

%

Deferred fixed annuities and institutional products

 

4.5

 

4.4

 

3.3

 

3.2

 

1.2

 

1.2

 

Immediate fixed annuities with and without life contingencies

 

6.2

 

6.4

 

6.2

 

6.5

 

 

(0.1

)

Investments supporting capital, traditional life and other products

 

3.8

 

3.7

 

n/a

 

n/a

 

n/a

 

n/a

 

 

The following table summarizes our product liabilities and indicates the account value of those contracts and policies in which an investment spread is generated.

 

 

 

March 31,

 

($ in millions)

 

2011

 

2010

 

Immediate fixed annuities with life contingencies

 

$

8,749

 

$

8,512

 

Other life contingent contracts and other

 

4,066

 

3,859

 

Reserve for life-contingent contract benefits

 

$

12,815

 

$

12,371

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest-sensitive life insurance

 

$

10,098

 

$

9,798

 

Deferred fixed annuities

 

28,558

 

31,540

 

Immediate fixed annuities without life contingencies

 

3,794

 

3,868

 

Institutional products

 

2,193

 

3,448

 

Market value adjustments related to fair value hedges and other

 

505

 

627

 

Contractholder funds

 

$

45,148

 

$

49,281

 

 

Amortization of DAC increased 85.1% or $57 million in the first quarter of 2011 compared to the same period of 2010.  The components of amortization of DAC are summarized in the following table.

 

 

 

Three months ended
March 31,

 

($ in millions)

 

2011

 

2010

 

Amortization of DAC before amortization relating to realized capital gains and losses and changes in assumptions

 

$

(76

)

$

(77

)

Amortization relating to realized capital gains and losses (1)

 

(35

)

(3

)

Amortization (acceleration) deceleration for changes in assumptions (“DAC unlocking”)

 

(13

)

13

 

Total amortization of DAC

 

$

(124

)

$

(67

)

 


(1)             The impact of realized capital gains and losses on amortization of DAC is dependent upon the relationship between the assets that give rise to the gain or loss and the product liability supported by the assets.  Fluctuations result from changes in the impact of realized capital gains and losses on actual and expected gross profits.

 

The increase of $57 million in the first quarter of 2011 was primarily due to increased amortization relating to realized capital gains and losses and an unfavorable change in amortization acceleration/deceleration for changes in assumptions.  DAC amortization relating to realized capital gains and losses primarily resulted from realized capital gains on sales of fixed income securities in the first quarter of 2011.

 

Our annual comprehensive review of the profitability of our products to determine DAC balances for our interest-sensitive life, fixed annuities and other investment contracts covers assumptions for investment returns, including capital gains and losses, interest crediting rates to policyholders, the effect of any hedges, persistency, mortality and expenses in all product lines.  In the first quarter of 2011, the review resulted in an acceleration of

 

43



 

DAC amortization (charge to income) of $13 million.  Amortization acceleration of $19 million related to interest-sensitive life insurance and was primarily due to an increase in projected expenses.  Amortization deceleration of $6 million related to fixed annuities and was primarily due to an increase in projected investment margins on equity-indexed annuities.

 

In the first quarter of 2010, the review resulted in a deceleration of DAC amortization (credit to income) of $13 million.  Amortization deceleration of $45 million related to variable life insurance and was primarily due to appreciation in the underlying separate account valuations.  Amortization acceleration of $31 million related to interest-sensitive life insurance and was primarily due to an increase in projected realized capital losses and lower projected renewal premium (which is also expected to reduce persistency), partially offset by lower expenses.

 

The following table provides the effect on DAC amortization of changes in assumptions relating to the gross profit components of investment margin, benefit margin and expense margin.

 

 

 

Three months ended
March 31,

 

($ in millions) 

 

2011

 

2010

 

Investment margin

 

$

2

 

$

15

 

Benefit margin

 

7

 

(45

)

Expense margin

 

(22

)

43

 

Net (acceleration) deceleration

 

$

(13

)

$

13

 

 

Operating costs and expenses decreased 10.5% or $9 million in the first quarter of 2011 compared to the same period of 2010.  The following table summarizes operating costs and expenses.

 

 

 

Three months ended
March 31,

 

($ in millions)

 

2011

 

2010

 

Non-deferrable acquisition costs

 

$

21

 

$

22

 

Other operating costs and expenses

 

56

 

64

 

Total operating costs and expenses

 

$

77

 

$

86

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Restructuring and related charges

 

$

(2

)

$

 

 

Non-deferrable acquisition costs decreased 4.5% or $1 million in the first quarter of 2011 compared to the same period of 2010 primarily due to lower non-deferrable commissions and premium tax expenses related to discontinuing sales through banks and broker dealers effective March 31, 2010.  Other operating costs and expenses decreased 12.5% or $8 million in the first quarter of 2011 compared to the same period of 2010 primarily due to increased reinsurance expense allowances, lower occupancy costs due to consolidation of office buildings and non-recurring offsets to certain administrative costs of $3 million.

 

Income tax expense of $40 million was recognized for the first quarter of 2011 compared to an income tax benefit of $16 million in the same period of 2010.  This change was due to the proportionate change in the income on which the income tax expense was determined.

 

44



 

INVESTMENTS HIGHLIGHTS

 

·                  Investments as of March 31, 2011 totaled $58.51 billion, a decrease of 1.6% from $59.44 billion as of December 31, 2010.

·                Unrealized net capital gains totaled $913 million as of March 31, 2011, improving from $758 million as of December 31, 2010.

·                As of March 31, 2011, the fair value for our below investment grade fixed income securities with gross unrealized losses totaled $2.25 billion compared to $2.01 billion as of December 31, 2010.  The gross unrealized losses for these securities totaled $587 million as of March 31, 2011, an improvement of 16.5% from $703 million as of December 31, 2010.

·                  Net investment income was $662 million in the first quarter of 2011, a decrease of 6.4% from $707 million in the first quarter of 2010.

·                  Net realized capital gains were $45 million in the first quarter of 2011 compared to net realized capital losses of $161 million in the first quarter of 2010.

·                  During the first quarter of 2011, our fixed income and mortgage loan portfolio generated $1.41 billion of cash flows from interest and maturities.

 

INVESTMENTS

 

Improved market fundamentals in combination with our risk mitigation and return optimization strategies have strengthened our capital position, enabling us to execute yield and return enhancement strategies, while continuing to manage interest rate, credit and real estate investment risks.  Consistent with our economic outlook, we modified the maturity profile of our fixed income portfolio through shifts out of longer term fixed rate and shorter term lower yielding securities into intermediate term maturity securities.  Additionally, we increased our exposure to below investment grade corporate fixed income securities through a higher targeted allocation and reinvestment of proceeds from the sale of lower rated structured securities.

 

The composition of the investment portfolio as of March 31, 2011 is presented in the table below.

 

($ in millions)

 

Investments

 

Percent
to total

 

Fixed income securities (1)

 

$

47,629

 

81.4

%

Mortgage loans

 

6,461

 

11.0

 

Equity securities (2)

 

213

 

0.4

 

Limited partnership interests (3)

 

1,357

 

2.3

 

Short-term (4)

 

822

 

1.4

 

Policy loans

 

839

 

1.5

 

Other

 

1,186

 

2.0

 

Total

 

$

58,507

 

100.0

%

 


(1)             Fixed income securities are carried at fair value.  Amortized cost basis for these securities was $46.75 billion.

(2)             Equity securities are carried at fair value.  Cost basis for these securities was $154 million.

(3)             We have commitments to invest in additional limited partnership interests totaling $736 million.

(4)             Short-term investments are carried at fair value.  Amortized cost basis for these investments was $822 million.

 

Total investments decreased to $58.51 billion as of March 31, 2011, from $59.44 billion as of December 31, 2010, primarily due to net reductions in contractholder obligations of $1.31 billion, partially offset by higher valuations for fixed income securities.  Valuations of fixed income securities are typically driven by a combination of changes in relevant risk-free interest rates and credit spreads over the period.  Risk-free interest rates are typically defined as the yield on U.S. Treasury securities, whereas credit spread is the additional yield on fixed income securities above the risk-free rate that market participants require to compensate them for assuming credit, liquidity and/or prepayment risks.  The increase in valuation for fixed income securities for the three months ended March 31, 2011 was mainly due to tightening of credit spreads in certain sectors.

 

45



 

Fixed income securities by type are listed in the table below.

 

($ in millions)

 

Fair value as of
March 31, 2011

 

Percent to
total
investments

 

Fair value as of
December 31, 2010

 

Percent to
total
investments

 

U.S. government and agencies

 

$

2,517

 

4.3

%

$

3,494

 

5.9

%

Municipal

 

4,718

 

8.1

 

4,973

 

8.4

 

Corporate

 

29,857

 

51.0

 

28,650

 

48.2

 

Foreign government

 

2,186

 

3.7

 

2,257

 

3.8

 

Residential mortgage-backed securities (“RMBS”)

 

3,928

 

6.7

 

4,355

 

7.3

 

Commercial mortgage-backed securities (“CMBS”)

 

1,955

 

3.4

 

1,903

 

3.2

 

Asset-backed securities (“ABS”)

 

2,453

 

4.2

 

2,567

 

4.3

 

Redeemable preferred stock

 

15

 

 

15

 

 

Total fixed income securities

 

$

47,629

 

81.4

%

$

48,214

 

81.1

%

 

As of March 31, 2011, 91.2% of the fixed income securities portfolio was rated investment grade, which is defined as a security having a rating of Aaa, Aa, A or Baa from Moody’s, a rating of AAA, AA, A or BBB from Standard and Poor’s (“S&P”), Fitch, Dominion, or Realpoint, a rating of aaa, aa, a or bbb from A.M. Best, or a comparable internal rating if an externally provided rating is not available.  All of our fixed income securities are rated by third party credit rating agencies, the National Association of Insurance Commissioners (“NAIC”), and/or internally rated.  Our initial investment decisions and ongoing monitoring procedures for fixed income securities are based on a thorough due diligence process which includes, but is not limited to, an assessment of the credit quality, sector, structure, and liquidity risks of each issue.

 

46



 

The following table summarizes the fair value and unrealized net capital gains and losses for fixed income securities by credit rating as of March 31, 2011.

 

 

 

Aaa

 

Aa

 

A

 

($ in millions)

 

Fair
value

 

Unrealized

gain/(loss)

 

Fair
value

 

Unrealized
gain/(loss)

 

Fair
value

 

Unrealized
gain/(loss)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

U.S. government and agencies

 

$

2,517

 

$

207

 

$

 

$

 

$

 

$

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Municipal

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Tax exempt

 

 

 

28

 

1

 

 

 

Taxable

 

179

 

 

2,497

 

2

 

1,036

 

(36

)

Auction rate securities (“ARS”)

 

349

 

(26

)

16

 

(3

)

34

 

(4

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Corporate

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Public

 

732

 

7

 

1,699

 

65

 

6,190

 

263

 

Privately placed

 

560

 

9

 

1,602

 

45

 

3,527

 

155

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Foreign government

 

1,366

 

215

 

146

 

4

 

377

 

29

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

RMBS

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

U.S. government sponsored entities (“U.S. Agency”)

 

2,036

 

88

 

 

 

 

 

Prime residential mortgage-backed securities (“Prime”)

 

318

 

8

 

61

 

 

139

 

1

 

Alt-A residential mortgage-backed securities (“Alt-A”)

 

13

 

 

46

 

(1

)

62

 

 

Subprime residential mortgage-backed securities (“Subprime”)

 

31

 

1

 

78

 

(18

)

37

 

(6

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

CMBS

 

989

 

38

 

284

 

1

 

157

 

(10

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

ABS

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Collateralized debt obligations (“CDO”)

 

9

 

 

530

 

(9

)

440

 

(40

)

Consumer and other asset-backed securities (“Consumer and other ABS”)

 

279

 

8

 

161

 

2

 

206

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Redeemable preferred stock

 

 

 

1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total fixed income securities

 

$

9,378

 

$

555

 

$

7,149

 

$

89

 

$

12,205

 

$

352

 

 

 

 

Baa

 

Ba or lower

 

Total

 

 

 

Fair
value

 

Unrealized
gain/(loss)

 

Fair
value

 

Unrealized
gain/(loss)

 

Fair
value

 

Unrealized
gain/(loss)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

U.S. government and agencies

 

$

 

$

 

$

 

$

 

$

2,517

 

$

207

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Municipal

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Tax exempt

 

32

 

2

 

 

 

60

 

3

 

Taxable

 

433

 

(71

)

59

 

(28

)

4,204

 

(133

)

ARS

 

42

 

(5

)

13

 

(2

)

454

 

(40

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Corporate

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Public

 

7,098

 

320

 

1,188

 

30

 

16,907

 

685

 

Privately placed

 

5,972

 

184

 

1,289

 

24

 

12,950

 

417

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Foreign government

 

297

 

18

 

 

 

2,186

 

266

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

RMBS

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

U.S. Agency

 

 

 

 

 

2,036

 

88

 

Prime   

 

6

 

 

237

 

2

 

761

 

11

 

Alt-A

 

31

 

(1

)

253

 

(42

)

405

 

(44

)

Subprime

 

63

 

(18

)

517

 

(252

)

726

 

(293

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

CMBS

 

341

 

(53

)

184

 

(81

)

1,955

 

(105

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

ABS

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

CDO

 

275

 

(57

)

426

 

(84

)

1,680

 

(190

)

Consumer and other ABS

 

102

 

(1

)

25

 

(5

)

773

 

4

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Redeemable preferred stock

 

14

 

 

 

 

15

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total fixed income securities

 

$

14,706

 

$

318

 

$

4,191

 

$

(438

)

$

47,629

 

$

876

 

 

47



 

Municipal Bonds, including tax exempt, taxable and ARS securities, totaled $4.72 billion as of March 31, 2011 with an unrealized net capital loss of $170 million.  The municipal bond portfolio includes general obligations of state and local issuers, revenue bonds and pre-refunded bonds, which are bonds for which an irrevocable trust has been established to fund the remaining payments of principal and interest.

 

The following table summarizes by state, the fair value, amortized cost and credit rating of our municipal bonds, excluding $33 million of pre-refunded bonds, as of March 31, 2011:

 

($ in millions)


State

 

State
general
obligation

 

Local general
obligation

 

Revenue (1)

 

Fair value

 

Amortized
cost

 

Average
credit
rating 
(2)

 

California

 

$

60

 

$

342

 

$

297

 

$

699

 

$

763

 

A

 

Texas

 

 

254

 

293

 

547

 

558

 

Aa

 

New York

 

16

 

4

 

346

 

366

 

373

 

Aa

 

New Jersey

 

120

 

21

 

121

 

262

 

272

 

Aa

 

Delaware

 

 

 

261

 

261

 

278

 

Aa

 

Illinois

 

 

92

 

120

 

212

 

220

 

Aa

 

Florida

 

24

 

56

 

116

 

196

 

196

 

Aa

 

Oregon

 

 

144

 

26

 

170

 

171

 

A

 

Ohio

 

 

78

 

79

 

157

 

154

 

Aa

 

Michigan

 

32

 

54

 

68

 

154

 

161

 

Aa

 

All others

 

204

 

249

 

1,208

 

1,661

 

1,713

 

A

 

Total

 

$

456

 

$

1,294

 

$

2,935

 

$

4,685

 

$

4,859

 

Aa

 

 


(1)

The nature of the activities supporting revenue municipals is highly diversified and includes transportation, health care, industrial development, housing, higher education, utilities, recreation/convention centers and other activities.

(2)

The municipal bonds are rated by third party credit rating agencies, the NAIC and/or internally rated.

 

Our practice for acquiring and monitoring municipal bonds is predominantly based on the underlying credit quality of the primary obligor.  We currently rely on the primary obligor to pay all contractual cash flows and are not relying on bond insurers for payments.  As a result of downgrades in the insurers’ credit ratings, the ratings of the insured municipal bonds generally reflect the underlying ratings of the primary obligor.  As of March 31, 2011, 99.1% of our insured municipal bond portfolio is rated investment grade.  Given the effects of the economic crisis on bond insurers, the value inherent in the insurance has declined.  Further, we believe the fair value of our insured municipal bond portfolio substantially reflects the decline in the value of the insurance.  We believe that the loss of the benefit of insurance would not result in a material adverse impact on our results of operations, financial position or liquidity.

 

Corporate bonds, including publicly traded and privately placed, totaled $29.86 billion as of March 31, 2011 with an unrealized net capital gain of $1.10 billion.  Privately placed securities primarily consist of corporate issued senior debt securities that are in unregistered form or are directly negotiated with the borrower.

 

 RMBS, CMBS and ABS are structured securities that are primarily collateralized by residential and commercial real estate loans and other consumer or corporate borrowings.  The cash flows from the underlying collateral paid to the securitization trust are generally applied in a pre-determined order and are designed so that each security issued by the trust, typically referred to as a “class”, qualifies for a specific original rating.  For example, the “senior” portion or “top” of the capital structure, or rating class, which would originally qualify for a rating of Aaa typically has priority in receiving principal repayments on the underlying collateral and retains this priority until the class is paid in full.  In a sequential structure, underlying collateral principal repayments are directed to the most senior rated Aaa class in the structure until paid in full, after which principal repayments are directed to the next most senior Aaa class in the structure until it is paid in full.  Senior Aaa classes generally share any losses from the underlying collateral on a pro-rata basis after losses are absorbed by classes with lower original ratings.  The payment priority and class subordination included in these securities serves as credit enhancement for holders of the senior or top portions of the structures.  These securities continue to retain the payment priority features that existed at the origination of the securitization trust.  Other forms of credit enhancement may include structural features embedded in the securitization trust, such as overcollateralization, excess spread and bond insurance.  The underlying collateral can have fixed interest rates, variable interest rates (such as adjustable rate mortgages (“ARM”)) or may contain features of both fixed and variable rate mortgages.

 

RMBS, including U.S. Agency, Prime, Alt-A and Subprime, totaled $3.93 billion, with 74.4% rated investment grade, as of March 31, 2011.  The RMBS portfolio is subject to interest rate risk, but unlike other fixed income securities, is additionally subject to significant prepayment risk from the underlying residential mortgage loans.  The

 

48



 

credit risk associated with our RMBS portfolio is mitigated due to the fact that 51.8% of the portfolio consists of securities that were issued by or have underlying collateral guaranteed by U.S. government agencies.  The unrealized net capital loss of $238 million as of March 31, 2011 was the result of wider credit spreads than at initial purchase on the non-U.S. Agency portion of our RMBS portfolio, largely due to higher risk premiums caused by macroeconomic conditions and credit market deterioration, including the impact of lower real estate valuations, which began to show signs of stabilization in certain geographic areas in 2010.  The following table shows our RMBS portfolio as of March 31, 2011 based upon vintage year of the issuance of the securities.

 

 

 

U.S. Agency

 

Prime

 

Alt-A

 

Subprime

 

Total RMBS

 

($ in millions)

 

Fair
value

 

Unrealized
gain/(loss)

 

Fair
value

 

Unrealized
gain/(loss)

 

Fair
value

 

Unrealized
gain/(loss)

 

Fair
value

 

Unrealized
gain/(loss)

 

Fair
value

 

Unrealized
gain/(loss)

 

2010

 

$

 

$

 

$

167

 

$

3

 

$

52

 

$

1

 

$

 

$

 

$

219

 

$

4

 

2009

 

392

 

6

 

47

 

1

 

8

 

 

 

 

447

 

7

 

2008

 

247

 

6

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

247

 

6

 

2007

 

77

 

3

 

131

 

7

 

32

 

(12

)

190

 

(108

)

430

 

(110

)

2006

 

98

 

7

 

96

 

(2

)

94

 

(12

)

162

 

(72

)

450

 

(79

)

2005

 

321

 

13

 

110

 

(3

)

95

 

(5

)

195

 

(72

)

721

 

(67

)

Pre-2005

 

901

 

53

 

210

 

5

 

124

 

(16

)

179

 

(41

)

1,414

 

1

 

Total

 

$

2,036

 

$

88

 

$

761

 

$

11

 

$

405

 

$

(44

)

$

726

 

$

(293

)

$

3,928

 

$

(238

)

 

Prime are collateralized by residential mortgage loans issued to prime borrowers.  As of March 31, 2011, $614 million of the Prime had fixed rate underlying collateral and $147 million had variable rate underlying collateral.

 

Alt-A includes securities collateralized by residential mortgage loans issued to borrowers who do not qualify for prime financing terms due to high loan-to-value ratios or limited supporting documentation, but have stronger credit profiles than subprime borrowers.  As of March 31, 2011, $331 million of the Alt-A had fixed rate underlying collateral and $74 million had variable rate underlying collateral.

 

Subprime includes securities collateralized by residential mortgage loans issued to borrowers that cannot qualify for Prime or Alt-A financing terms due in part to weak or limited credit history.  It also includes securities that are collateralized by certain second lien mortgages regardless of the borrower’s credit history.  The Subprime portfolio consisted of $538 million and $188 million of first lien and second lien securities, respectively.  As of March 31, 2011, $409 million of the Subprime had fixed rate underlying collateral and $317 million had variable rate underlying collateral.

 

CMBS totaled $1.96 billion, with 90.6% rated investment grade, as of March 31, 2011.  The CMBS portfolio is subject to credit risk, but unlike certain other structured securities, is generally not subject to prepayment risk due to protections within the underlying commercial mortgage loans.  Of the CMBS investments, 96.6% are traditional conduit transactions collateralized by commercial mortgage loans, broadly diversified across property types and geographical area.  The remainder consists of non-traditional CMBS such as small balance transactions, large loan pools and single borrower transactions.

 

The following table shows our CMBS portfolio as of March 31, 2011 based upon vintage year of the underlying collateral.

 

($ in millions) 

 

Fair
value

 

Unrealized
gain/(loss)

 

2007

 

$

285

 

$

(8

)

2006

 

608

 

(82

)

2005

 

321

 

(24

)

Pre-2005

 

741

 

9

 

Total CMBS

 

$

1,955

 

$

(105

)

 

The unrealized net capital loss of $105 million as of March 31, 2011 on our CMBS portfolio was the result of wider credit spreads than at initial purchase, largely due to the macroeconomic conditions and credit market deterioration, including the impact of lower real estate valuations, which began to show signs of stabilization in certain geographic areas in 2010.  While CMBS spreads tightened during 2009 and 2010, credit spreads in most rating classes remain wider than at initial purchase, which is particularly evident in our 2005-2007 vintage year CMBS.

 

49



 

ABS, including CDO and Consumer and other ABS, totaled $2.45 billion, with 81.6% rated investment grade, as of March 31, 2011.  Credit risk is managed by monitoring the performance of the underlying collateral.  Many of the securities in the ABS portfolio have credit enhancement with features such as overcollateralization, subordinated structures, reserve funds, guarantees and/or insurance.  The unrealized net capital loss of $186 million as of March 31, 2011 on our ABS portfolio was the result of wider credit spreads than at initial purchase.

 

CDO totaled $1.68 billion, with 74.6% rated investment grade, as of March 31, 2011.  CDO consist primarily of obligations collateralized by high yield and investment grade corporate credits including $1.28 billion of cash flow collateralized loan obligations (“CLO”) with unrealized losses of $97 million.  The remaining $402 million of securities consisted of synthetic CDO, trust preferred CDO, project finance CDO, market value CDO, collateralized bond obligations and other CLO with unrealized losses of $93 million.

 

Consumer and other ABS totaled $773 million, with 96.8% rated investment grade, as of March 31, 2011.  Consumer and other ABS consists of $369 million of consumer auto and $404 million of other ABS with unrealized gains of $4 million for consumer auto and no unrealized gains or losses for other ABS.

 

Mortgage loans  Our mortgage loan portfolio totaled $6.46 billion as of March 31, 2011, compared to $6.55 billion as of December 31, 2010, and primarily comprises loans secured by first mortgages on developed commercial real estate.  Key considerations used to manage our exposure include property type and geographic diversification by state and metropolitan area.

 

We recognized $2 million of realized capital losses related to net increases in the valuation allowances on impaired mortgage loans for the three months ended March 31, 2011, primarily due to deteriorating debt service coverage resulting from a decrease in occupancy and the risk associated with refinancing near-term maturities due to declining underlying collateral valuations.

 

For further detail on our mortgage loan portfolio, see Note 4 of the condensed consolidated financial statements.

 

Limited partnership interests consist of investments in private equity/debt funds, real estate funds, hedge funds and tax credit funds.  The limited partnership interests portfolio is well diversified across a number of characteristics including fund sponsors, vintage years, strategies, geography (including international), and company/property types.  The following table presents information about our limited partnership interests as of March 31, 2011.

 

($ in millions)

 

Private
equity/debt
funds

 

Real estate
funds

 

Hedge
funds

 

Tax
credit
funds

 

Total

 

Cost method of accounting (“Cost”)

 

$

554

 

$

143

 

$

 

$

 

$

697

 

Equity method of accounting (“EMA”)

 

380

 

161

 

2

 

117

 

660

 

Total

 

$

934

 

$

304

 

$

2

 

$

117

 

$

1,357

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Number of sponsors

 

80

 

29

 

1

 

6

 

 

 

Number of individual funds

 

127

 

54

 

2

 

6

 

 

 

Largest exposure to single fund

 

$

23

 

$

16

 

$

2

 

$

25

 

 

 

 

Our aggregate limited partnership exposure represented 2.3% and 2.1% of total invested assets as of March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively.

 

50



 

The following table shows the results from our limited partnership interests by fund type and accounting classification for the three months ended March 31.

 

 

 

2011

 

2010

 

($ in millions)

 

Cost

 

EMA

 

Total
income

 

Impairment
write-downs 
(1)

 

Cost

 

EMA

 

Total
income

 

Impairment
write-downs 
(1)

 

Private equity/debt funds

 

$

5

 

$

12

 

$

17

 

$

 

$

3

 

$

9

 

$

12

 

$

(2

)

Real estate funds

 

 

6

 

6

 

 

 

(18

)

(18

)

(9

)

Hedge funds

 

 

 

 

 

 

5

 

5

 

 

Total

 

$

5

 

$

18

 

$

23

 

$

 

$

3

 

$

(4

)

$

(1

)

$

(11

)

 


(1)

There were no impairment write-downs related to Cost limited partnerships in the three months ended March 31, 2011. Impairment write-downs related to Cost limited partnerships were $11 million in the three months ended March 31, 2010. There were no impairment write-downs related to EMA limited partnerships in the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010.

 

Limited partnership interests, excluding impairment write-downs, produced income of $23 million in the three months ended March 31, 2011 compared to losses of $1 million in the three months ended March 31, 2010.  Income on EMA limited partnerships is recognized on a delay due to the availability of the related financial statements.  The recognition of income on hedge funds is primarily on a one-month delay and the income recognition on private equity/debt funds, real estate funds and tax credit funds are generally on a three-month delay.  Income on Cost limited partnerships is recognized only upon receipt of amounts distributed by the partnership.

 

Unrealized net capital gains totaled $913 million as of March 31, 2011 compared to unrealized net capital gains of $758 million as of December 31, 2010.  The improvement since December 31, 2010 was primarily a result of tightening of credit spreads in certain sectors.  The following table presents unrealized net capital gains and losses, pre-tax and after-tax.

 

($ in millions)

 

March 31,
2011

 

December 31,
2010

 

U.S. government and agencies

 

$

207

 

$

236

 

Municipal

 

(170

)

(206

)

Corporate

 

1,102

 

1,141

 

Foreign government

 

266

 

295

 

RMBS

 

(238

)

(319

)

CMBS

 

(105

)

(218

)

ABS

 

(186

)

(201

)

Fixed income securities (1)

 

876

 

728

 

Equity securities

 

59

 

47

 

EMA limited partnership interests

 

4

 

 

Derivatives

 

(26

)

(17

)

Unrealized net capital gains and losses, pre-tax

 

913

 

758

 

Amounts recognized for:

 

 

 

 

 

Insurance reserves (2)

 

(2

)

(41

)

DAC and DSI (3)

 

97

 

98

 

Amounts recognized

 

95

 

57

 

Deferred income taxes

 

(358

)

(290

)

Unrealized net capital gains and losses, after-tax

 

$

650

 

$

525

 

 


(1)

Unrealized net capital gains and losses for fixed income securities as of March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010 comprise $(159) million and $(153) million, respectively, related to unrealized net capital losses on fixed income securities with other-than-temporary impairment and $1.04 billion and $881 million, respectively, related to other unrealized net capital gains and losses.

(2)

The insurance reserves adjustment represents the amount by which the reserve balance would increase if the net unrealized gains in the applicable product portfolios were realized and reinvested at current lower interest rates, resulting in a premium deficiency. Although we evaluate premium deficiencies on the combined performance of our life insurance and immediate annuities with life contingencies, the adjustment primarily relates to structured settlement annuities with life contingencies, in addition to annuity buy-outs and certain payout annuities with life contingencies.

(3)

The DAC and DSI adjustment balance represents the amount by which the amortization of DAC and DSI would increase or decrease if the unrealized gains or losses in the respective product portfolios were realized. Only the unrealized net capital gains and losses on the fixed annuity and interest-

 

51



 

 

sensitive life product portfolios are used in this calculation. The DAC and DSI adjustment balance, subject to limitations, is determined by applying the DAC and DSI amortization rate to unrealized net capital gains or losses. Recapitalization of the DAC and DSI balances is limited to the originally deferred costs plus interest.

 

The unrealized net capital gains for the fixed income portfolio totaled $876 million and comprised $2.24 billion of gross unrealized gains and $1.37 billion of gross unrealized losses as of March 31, 2011.  This is compared to unrealized net capital gains for the fixed income portfolio totaling $728 million, comprised of $2.42 billion of gross unrealized gains and $1.69 billion of gross unrealized losses as of December 31, 2010.

 

Gross unrealized gains and losses as of March 31, 2011 on fixed income securities by type and sector are provided in the table below.

 

 

 

Par

 

Amortized

 

Gross unrealized

 

Fair

 

Amortized
cost as a
percent of

 

Fair value
as a
percent of

 

($ in millions)

 

value (1)

 

cost

 

Gains

 

Losses

 

value

 

par value (2)

 

par value (2)

 

Corporate:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Banking

 

$

3,039

 

$

2,969

 

$

87

 

$

(101

)

$

2,955

 

97.7

%

97.2

%

Utilities

 

5,541

 

5,544

 

369

 

(60

)

5,853

 

100.1

 

105.6

 

Consumer goods (cyclical and non-cyclical)

 

4,948

 

5,019

 

211

 

(42

)

5,188

 

101.4

 

104.9

 

Financial services

 

2,522

 

2,530

 

103

 

(26

)

2,607

 

100.3

 

103.4

 

Capital goods

 

3,306

 

3,303

 

194

 

(23

)

3,474

 

99.9

 

105.1

 

Transportation

 

1,581

 

1,597

 

81

 

(22

)

1,656

 

101.0

 

104.7

 

Technology

 

1,137

 

1,148

 

44

 

(12

)

1,180

 

101.0

 

103.8

 

Basic industry

 

1,482

 

1,491

 

79

 

(10

)

1,560

 

100.6

 

105.3

 

Communications

 

1,660

 

1,661

 

84

 

(7

)

1,738

 

100.1

 

104.7

 

Energy

 

1,983

 

2,000

 

106

 

(5

)

2,101

 

100.9

 

106.0

 

Other

 

1,593

 

1,493

 

60

 

(8

)

1,545

 

93.7

 

97.0

 

Total corporate fixed income portfolio

 

28,792

 

28,755

 

1,418

 

(316

)

29,857

 

99.9

 

103.7

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

U.S. government and agencies

 

2,952

 

2,310

 

213

 

(6

)

2,517

 

78.3

 

85.3

 

Municipal

 

6,932

 

4,888

 

95

 

(265

)

4,718

 

70.5

 

68.1

 

Foreign government

 

2,375

 

1,920

 

275

 

(9

)

2,186

 

80.8

 

92.0

 

RMBS

 

4,539

 

4,166

 

122

 

(360

)

3,928

 

91.8

 

86.5

 

CMBS

 

2,083

 

2,060

 

60

 

(165

)

1,955

 

98.9

 

93.9

 

ABS

 

2,967

 

2,639

 

59

 

(245

)

2,453

 

88.9

 

82.7

 

Redeemable preferred stock

 

14

 

15

 

 

 

15

 

107.1

 

107.1

 

Total fixed income securities

 

$

50,654

 

$

46,753

 

$

2,242

 

$

(1,366

)

$

47,629

 

92.3

 

94.0

 

 


(1)

Included in par value are zero-coupon securities that are generally purchased at a deep discount to the par value that is received at maturity. These primarily included corporate, municipal, foreign government and U.S. government and agencies zero-coupon securities with par value of $683 million, $2.98 billion, $1.33 billion and $1.64 billion, respectively.

(2)

Excluding the impact of zero-coupon securities, the percentage of amortized cost to par value would be 100.4% for corporates, 98.9% for municipals, 104.0% for foreign governments and 103.9% for U.S. government and agencies. Similarly, excluding the impact of zero-coupon securities, the percentage of fair value to par value would be 104.2% for corporates, 97.9% for municipals, 109.7% for foreign governments and 107.4% for U.S. government and agencies.

 

The banking, utilities, consumer goods, financial services and capital goods sectors had the highest concentration of gross unrealized losses in our corporate fixed income securities portfolio as of March 31, 2011.  In general, credit spreads remain wider than at initial purchase for most of the securities with gross unrealized losses in these categories.

 

The unrealized net capital gain for the equity portfolio totaled $59 million and comprised $60 million of gross unrealized gains and $1 million of gross unrealized losses as of March 31, 2011.  This is compared to an unrealized net capital gain for the equity portfolio totaling $47 million, comprised of $48 million of gross unrealized gains and $1 million of gross unrealized losses as of December 31, 2010.

 

We have a comprehensive portfolio monitoring process to identify and evaluate each fixed income and equity security that may be other-than-temporarily impaired.  The process includes a quarterly review of all securities to identify instances where the fair value of a security compared to its amortized cost (for fixed income securities) or cost (for equity securities) is below established thresholds.  The process also includes the monitoring of other impairment indicators such as ratings, ratings downgrades and payment defaults.  The securities identified, in addition to other securities for which we may have a concern, are evaluated based on facts and circumstances for inclusion on our watch-list.  All investments in an unrealized loss position as of March 31, 2011 were included in our portfolio monitoring process for determining whether declines in value were other than temporary.

 

52



 

The extent and duration of a decline in fair value for fixed income securities have become less indicative of actual credit deterioration with respect to an issue or issuer.  While we continue to use declines in fair value and the length of time a security is in an unrealized loss position as indicators of potential credit deterioration, our determination of whether a security’s decline in fair value is other than temporary has placed greater emphasis on our analysis of the underlying credit and collateral and related estimates of future cash flows.

 

The following table summarizes the fair values and gross unrealized losses of fixed income securities by type and investment grade classification as of March 31, 2011.

 

 

 

Investment grade

 

Below investment grade

 

Total

 

($ in millions)

 

Fair
value

 

Unrealized
losses

 

Fair
value

 

Unrealized
losses

 

Fair
value

 

Unrealized
losses

 

U.S. government and agencies

 

$

177

 

$

(6

)

$

 

$

 

$

177

 

$

(6

)

Municipal

 

2,431

 

(234

)

55

 

(31

)

2,486

 

(265

)

Corporate

 

5,882

 

(265

)

928

 

(51

)

6,810

 

(316

)

Foreign government

 

206

 

(9

)

 

 

206

 

(9

)

RMBS

 

412

 

(48

)

740

 

(312

)

1,152

 

(360

)

CMBS

 

673

 

(80

)

157

 

(85

)

830

 

(165

)

ABS

 

1,025

 

(137

)

374

 

(108

)

1,399

 

(245

)

Total

 

$

10,806

 

$

(779

)

$

2,254

 

$

(587

)

$

13,060

 

$

(1,366

)

 

We have experienced declines in the fair values of fixed income securities primarily due to wider credit spreads resulting from higher risk premiums since the time of initial purchase, largely due to macroeconomic conditions and credit market deterioration, including the impact of lower real estate valuations, which began to show signs of stabilization in certain geographic areas in 2010.  Consistent with their ratings, our portfolio monitoring process indicates that investment grade securities have a low risk of default.  Securities rated below investment grade, comprising securities with a rating of Ba, B and Caa or lower, have a higher risk of default.

 

As of March 31, 2011, 66% of our below investment grade gross unrealized losses were concentrated in RMBS, specifically Alt-A and Subprime, and CMBS.  The fair value of these securities totaled $848 million, an increase of 6.8%, compared to $794 million as of December 31, 2010.  Gross unrealized losses on these securities totaled $385 million as of March 31, 2011, a decrease of 15.9%, compared to $458 million as of December 31, 2010, due to improved valuations, sales, impairment write-downs and principal collections, partially offset by the downgrade of certain securities to below investment grade during the first quarter of 2011.

 

Fair values for our structured securities are obtained from third-party valuation service providers and are subject to review as disclosed in our Application of Critical Accounting Estimates.  In accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”), when fair value is less than the amortized cost of a security and we have not made the decision to sell the security and it is not more likely than not we will be required to sell the security before recovery of its amortized cost basis, we evaluate if we expect to receive cash flows sufficient to recover the entire amortized cost basis of the security.  We calculate the estimated recovery value by discounting our best estimate of future cash flows at the security’s original or current effective rate, as appropriate, and compare this to the amortized cost of the security.  If we do not expect to receive cash flows sufficient to recover the entire amortized cost basis of the security, the credit loss component of the impairment is recorded in earnings, with the remaining amount of the unrealized loss related to other factors (“non-credit-related”) recognized in other comprehensive income (“OCI”).

 

The non-credit-related unrealized losses for our structured securities, including our below investment grade Alt-A, Subprime and CMBS, are heavily influenced by risk factors other than those related to our best estimate of future cash flows.  The difference between these securities’ original or current effective rates and the yields implied by their fair value indicates that a higher risk premium is included in the valuation of these securities than existed at initial issue or purchase.  This risk premium represents the return that a market participant requires as compensation to assume the risk associated with the uncertainties regarding the future performance of the underlying collateral.  The risk premium is comprised of: default risk, which reflects the probability of default and the uncertainty related to collection of contractual principal and interest; liquidity risk, which reflects the risk associated with exiting the investment in an illiquid market, both in terms of timeliness and cost; and volatility risk, which reflects the potential valuation volatility during an investor’s holding period.  Other factors reflected in the risk premium include the costs associated with underwriting, monitoring and holding these types of complex securities.  Certain aspects of the default risk are included in the development of our best estimate of future cash flows, as appropriate.  Other aspects

 

53



 

of the risk premium are considered to be temporary in nature and are expected to reverse over the remaining lives of the securities as future cash flows are received.

 

Other-than-temporary impairment assessment for below investment grade Alt-A and Subprime RMBS

 

As of March 31, 2011, the fair value of our below investment grade Alt-A securities with gross unrealized losses totaled $211 million, an increase of 25.6% compared to $168 million as of December 31, 2010.  As of March 31, 2011, gross unrealized losses for our below investment grade Alt-A portfolio totaled $47 million, an increase of 11.9% compared to $42 million as of December 31, 2010, due to downgrades of certain Alt-A securities to below investment grade during first quarter of 2011, partially offset by impairment write-downs.  For our below investment grade Alt-A securities with gross unrealized gains of $4 million, we have recognized cumulative write-downs in earnings totaling $4 million as of March 31, 2011.

 

As of March 31, 2011, the fair value of our below investment grade Subprime securities with gross unrealized losses totaled $480 million, a decrease of 2.0% compared to $490 million as of December 31, 2010.  As of March 31, 2011, gross unrealized losses for our below investment grade Subprime portfolio totaled $253 million, a decrease of 10.6% compared to $283 million as of December 31, 2010, due to improved valuations resulting from lower risk premiums, sales, impairment write-downs and principal collections, partially offset by downgrades of certain Subprime securities to below investment grade during the first quarter of 2011.  For our below investment grade Subprime with gross unrealized gains totaling $2 million, we have recognized cumulative write-downs in earnings totaling $63 million as of March 31, 2011.

 

The credit loss evaluation for Alt-A and Subprime securities with gross unrealized losses is performed in two phases.  The first phase estimates the future cash flows of the entire securitization trust from which our security was issued.  A critical part of this estimate involves forecasting default rates and loss severities of the residential mortgage loans that collateralize the securitization trust.  The factors that affect the default rates and loss severities include, but are not limited to, historical collateral performance, collateral type, transaction vintage year, geographic concentrations, borrower credit quality, origination practices of the transaction sponsor, and practices of the mortgage loan servicers.  Current loan-to-value ratios of underlying collateral are not consistently available and accordingly they are not a primary factor in our impairment evaluation.  While our projections are developed internally and customized to our specific holdings, they are informed by and benchmarked against credit opinions obtained from third parties, such as industry analysts, nationally recognized credit rating agencies and an RMBS loss modeling advisory service.  The default rate and loss severity forecasts result in an estimate of trust-level projected additional collateral loss.

 

We then analyze the actual cumulative collateral losses incurred to date by the securitization trust, our projected additional collateral losses expected to be incurred and the position of the class of securities we own in the securitization trust relative to the trust’s other classes to determine whether any of the collateral losses will be applied to our class.  If our class has remaining credit enhancement sufficient to withstand the projected additional collateral losses, no collateral losses will be realized by our class and we expect to collect all contractual principal and interest of the security we own.  Remaining credit enhancement is measured in terms of (i) subordination from other classes of securities in the trust that are contractually obligated to absorb losses before the class of security we own and (ii) the expected impact of other structural features embedded in the securitization trust beneficial to our class, such as overcollateralization and excess spread.

 

For securities where there is insufficient remaining credit enhancement for the class of securities we own, a recovery value is calculated based on our best estimate of future cash flows specific to that security.  This estimate is based on the contractual principal payments and current interest payments of the securities we own, adjusted for actual cumulative collateral losses incurred to date and the projected additional collateral losses expected to be incurred.  This estimate also takes into consideration additional secondary sources of credit support, such as reliable bond insurance.  For securities without secondary sources of credit support or for which the secondary sources do not fully offset the actual and projected additional collateral losses applied to them, a credit loss is recorded in earnings to the extent amortized cost exceeds recovery value.

 

94.9% and 5.1% of the fair value of our below investment grade Alt-A securities with gross unrealized losses were issued with Aaa and Aa original ratings and capital structure classifications, respectively.  74.7%, 21.3% and 4.0% of the fair value of our below investment grade Subprime securities with gross unrealized losses were issued with Aaa, Aa and A original ratings and capital structure classifications, respectively.  As described previously, Alt-A and Subprime securities with higher original ratings typically have priority in receiving the principal repayments

 

54



 

on the underlying collateral compared to those with lower original ratings.  While the projected cash flow assumptions for our below investment grade Alt-A and Subprime securities with gross unrealized losses have deteriorated since the securities were originated, as reflected by their current credit ratings, these securities continue to retain the payment priority features that existed at the origination of the securitization trust.

 

The following tables show trust-level, class-level and security-specific detailed information for our below investment grade Alt-A securities with gross unrealized losses, by credit rating.

 

 

 

March 31, 2011

 

 

 

With other-than-
temporary
impairments recorded
in earnings

 

Without other-than-temporary
impairments recorded in earnings

 

 

 

($ in millions)

 

Caa or
lower

 

Total

 

Ba

 

B

 

Caa or
lower

 

Total

 

Total

 

Trust-level

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Actual cumulative collateral losses incurred to date (1)

 

5.9

%

5.9

%

0.3

%

0.8

%

3.3

%

1.5

%

n/a

 

Projected additional collateral losses to be incurred (2)

 

21.2

%

21.2

%

5.5

%

10.2

%

15.5

%

10.2

%

n/a

 

Class-level

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Average remaining credit enhancement (3)

 

5.2

%

5.2

%

8.9

%

13.1

%

15.7

%

12.4

%

n/a

 

Security-specific

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Number of positions

 

16

 

16

 

4

 

4

 

4

 

12

 

28

 

Par value

 

$

220

 

$

220

 

$

37

 

$

20

 

$

32

 

$

89

 

$

309

 

Amortized cost

 

$

174

 

$

174

 

$

37

 

$

20

 

$

27

 

$

84

 

$

258

 

Fair value

 

$

140

 

$

140

 

$

34

 

$

15

 

$

22

 

$

71

 

$

211

 

Gross unrealized losses

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total

 

$

(34

)

$

(34

)

$

(3

)

$

(5

)

$

(5

)

$

(13

)

$

(47

)

12-24 months (4)

 

$

 

$

 

$

 

$

 

$

 

$

 

$

 

Over 24 months (5)

 

$

(34

)

$

(34

)

$

(2

)

$

(5

)

$

(5

)

$

(12

)

$

(46

)

Cumulative write-downs recognized (6)

 

$

(36

)

$

(36

)

$

 

$

 

$

 

$

 

$

(36

)

Principal payments received during the period (7)

 

$

3

 

$

3

 

$

 

$

 

$

1

 

$

1

 

$

4

 

 

 

 

December 31, 2010

 

 

 

With other-than-temporary
impairments recorded in earnings

 

Without other-than-temporary
impairments recorded in earnings

 

 

 

 

 

Ba

 

B

 

Caa or
lower

 

Total

 

Ba

 

B

 

Caa or
lower

 

Total

 

Total

 

Trust-level

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Actual cumulative collateral losses incurred to date (1)

 

0.5

%

0.7

%

5.9

%

5.7

%

0.1

%

1.2

%

2.5

%

1.8

%

n/a

 

Projected additional collateral losses to be incurred (2)

 

9.9

%

22.5

%

20.5

%

20.3

%

4.8

%

11.6

%

14.3

%

11.5

%

n/a

 

Class-level

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Average remaining credit enhancement (3)

 

9.9

%

19.0

%

4.6

%

4.9

%

5.3

%

24.0

%

17.6

%

14.0

%

n/a

 

Security-specific

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Number of positions

 

1

 

1

 

13

 

15

 

2

 

1

 

2

 

5

 

20

 

Par value

 

$

4

 

$

3

 

$

197

 

$

204

 

$

16

 

$

1

 

$

37

 

$

54

 

$

258

 

Amortized cost

 

$

4

 

$

2

 

$

154

 

$

160

 

$

16

 

$

1

 

$

33

 

$

50

 

$

210

 

Fair value

 

$

1

 

$

1

 

$

122

 

$

124

 

$

13

 

$

1

 

$

30

 

$

44

 

$

168

 

Gross unrealized losses

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total

 

$

(3

)

$

(1

)

$

(32

)

$

(36

)

$

(3

)

$

 

$

(3

)

$

(6

)

$

(42

)

12-24 months (4)

 

$

 

$

 

$

 

$

 

$

 

$

 

$

 

$

 

$

 

Over 24 months (5)

 

$

(3

)

$

(1

)

$

(32

)

$

(36

)

$

(3

)

$

 

$

(3

)

$

(6

)

$

(42

)

Cumulative write-downs recognized (6)

 

$

 

$

(1

)

$

(33

)

$

(34

)

$

 

$

 

$

 

$

 

$

(34

)

Principal payments received during the period (7)

 

$

 

$

 

$

13

 

$

13

 

$

1

 

$

 

$

2

 

$

3

 

$

16

 

 


(1)

Weighted average actual cumulative collateral losses incurred to date as of period end are based on the actual principal losses incurred as a percentage of the remaining principal amount of the loans in the trust. The weighting calculation is based on the par value of each security. Actual losses on the securities we hold are less than the losses on the underlying collateral as presented in this table. Actual cumulative realized principal losses on the below investment grade Alt-A securities we own, as reported by the trust servicers, were $4 million as of March 31, 2011.

(2)

Weighted average projected additional collateral losses to be incurred as of period end are based on our projections of future losses to be incurred by the trust, taking into consideration the actual cumulative collateral losses incurred to date, as a percentage of the remaining principal amount of the loans in the trust. Our projections are developed internally and customized to our specific holdings and are informed by and benchmarked against credit opinions obtained from third parties, such as industry analysts, nationally recognized credit rating agencies and an RMBS loss modeling advisory service. Projected additional collateral losses to be incurred are compared to average remaining credit enhancement for each security. For securities where the projected additional collateral losses exceed remaining credit enhancement, a

 

55



 

 

recovery value is calculated to determine whether impairment losses should be recorded in earnings. The weighting calculation is based on the par value of each security.

(3)

Weighted average remaining credit enhancement as of period end is based on structural subordination and the expected impact of other structural features existing in the securitization trust beneficial to our class and reflects our projection of future principal losses that can occur as a percentage of the remaining principal amount of the loans in the trust before the class of the security we own will incur its first dollar of principal loss. The weighting calculation is based on the par value of each security.

(4)

Includes total gross unrealized losses on securities in an unrealized loss position for a period of 12 to 24 consecutive months.

(5)

Includes total gross unrealized losses on securities in an unrealized loss position for a period more than 24 consecutive months. As of March 31, 2011, $16 million of unrealized losses on securities with other-than-temporary impairments recognized in earnings and $8 million of unrealized losses on securities without other-than-temporary impairments recognized in earnings have been greater than or equal to 20% of those securities’ amortized cost for a period of more than 24 consecutive months. As of December 31, 2010, $19 million of unrealized losses on securities with other-than-temporary impairments recognized in earnings and $1 million of unrealized losses on securities without other-than-temporary impairments recognized in earnings have been greater than or equal to 20% of those securities’ amortized cost for a period of more than 24 consecutive months.

(6)

Includes cumulative write-downs recorded in accordance with GAAP.

(7)

Reflects principal payments for the three months ended March 31, 2011 or the year ended December 31, 2010, respectively.

 

The above tables include information about our below investment grade Alt-A securities with gross unrealized losses as of each period presented.  The par value and composition of securities included can vary significantly from period to period due to changes in variables such as credit ratings, principal payments, sales, purchases and realized principal losses.

 

As of March 31, 2011, our below investment grade Alt-A securities with gross unrealized losses and without other-than-temporary impairments recorded in earnings had incurred actual cumulative collateral losses of 1.5%.  Our impairment evaluation forecasts more severe assumptions than the trusts are actually experiencing, including a projected weighted average underlying default rate of 25.7% and a projected weighted average loss severity of 41.0%, which resulted in projected additional collateral losses of 10.2%.  As the average remaining credit enhancement for these securities of 12.4% exceeds the projected additional collateral losses of 10.2%, these securities have not been impaired.

 

As of March 31, 2011, our below investment grade Alt-A securities with gross unrealized losses and with other-than-temporary impairments recorded in earnings had incurred actual cumulative collateral losses of 5.9%.  Our impairment evaluation forecasts more severe assumptions than the trusts are actually experiencing, including a projected weighted average underlying default rate of 37.5% and a projected weighted average loss severity of 55.5%, which resulted in projected additional collateral losses of 21.2%.  As the average remaining credit enhancement for these securities of 5.2% is insufficient to withstand the projected additional collateral losses, we have recognized cumulative write-downs in earnings on these securities as reflected in the table above using our calculated recovery value at the time of impairment.  The current average recovery value of these securities as a percentage of par was 79.5% and exceeded these securities’ current average amortized cost as a percentage of par of 79.1%, which demonstrates our conclusion that the nature of the remaining unrealized loss on these securities is temporary and will reverse over time.  The comparison indicates that recovery value exceeds amortized cost based on a comprehensive evaluation of financial, economic and capital markets assumptions developed for this reporting period.

 

We believe the unrealized losses on our Alt-A securities, including those over 24 months, result from the current risk premium on these securities, which should continue to reverse over the securities’ remaining lives, as demonstrated by improved valuations in 2010.  We expect to receive our estimated share of contractual principal and interest collections used to determine the securities’ recovery value.  As of March 31, 2011, we do not have the intent to sell and it is not more likely than not we will be required to sell these securities before the recovery of their amortized cost basis.  We believe that our valuation and impairment processes are comprehensive, employ the most current views about collateral and securitization trust financial positions, and demonstrate our recorded impairments and that the remaining unrealized losses on these positions are temporary.

 

56



 

The following tables show trust-level, class-level and security-specific detailed information for our below investment grade Subprime securities with gross unrealized losses that are not reliably insured, by credit rating.

 

 

 

March 31, 2011

 

 

 

With other-than-temporary
impairments recorded in earnings

 

Without other-than-temporary
impairments recorded in earnings

 

 

 

($ in millions)

 

B

 

Caa or
lower

 

Total

 

Ba

 

B

 

Caa or
lower

 

Total

 

Total

 

Trust-level

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Actual cumulative collateral losses incurred to date (1)

 

14.9

%

16.2

%

16.1

%

2.8

%

6.7

%

7.6

%

6.3

%

n/a

 

Projected additional collateral losses to be incurred

 

39.4

%

40.7

%

40.6

%

31.9

%

34.4

%

31.3

%

32.2

%

n/a

 

Class-level

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Average remaining credit enhancement

 

23.2

%

17.9

%

18.2

%

46.0

%

49.7

%

39.3

%

43.4

%

n/a

 

Security-specific

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Number of positions

 

4

 

55

 

59

 

5

 

9

 

26

 

40

 

99

 

Par value

 

$

31

 

$

577

 

$

608

 

$

46

 

$

53

 

$

111

 

$

210

 

$

818

 

Amortized cost

 

$

25

 

$

382

 

$

407

 

$

46

 

$

53

 

$

112

 

$

211

 

$

618

 

Fair value

 

$

16

 

$

253

 

$

269

 

$

36

 

$

34

 

$

59

 

$

129

 

$

398

 

Gross unrealized losses

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total

 

$

(9

)

$

(129

)

$

(138

)

$

(10

)

$

(19

)

$

(53

)

$

(82

)

$

(220

)

12-24 months

 

$

 

$

(1

)

$

(1

)

$

 

$

 

$

 

$

 

$

(1

)

Over 24 months (2)

 

$

(9

)

$

(128

)

$

(137

)

$

(10

)

$

(19

)

$

(53

)

$

(82

)

$

(219

)

Cumulative write-downs recognized

 

$

(5

)

$

(190

)

$

(195

)

$

 

$

 

$

 

$

 

$

(195

)

Principal payments received during the period

 

$

1

 

$

5

 

$

6

 

$

2

 

$

 

$

2

 

$

4

 

$

10

 

 

 

 

December 31, 2010

 

 

 

With other-than-temporary
impairments recorded in earnings

 

Without other-than-temporary
impairments recorded in earnings

 

 

 

 

 

B

 

Caa or
lower

 

Total

 

Ba

 

B

 

Caa or
lower

 

Total

 

Total

 

Trust-level

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Actual cumulative collateral losses incurred to date

 

14.2

%

15.6

%

15.5

%

12.0

%

12.2

%

10.8

%

11.3

%

n/a

 

Projected additional collateral losses to be incurred

 

38.9

%

41.2

%

41.1

%

44.7

%

42.1

%

38.8

%

40.6

%

n/a

 

Class-level

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Average remaining credit enhancement

 

24.5

%

19.2

%

19.5

%

69.9

%

65.3

%

49.0

%

56.4

%

n/a

 

Security-specific

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Number of positions

 

4

 

55

 

59

 

11

 

7

 

26

 

44

 

103

 

Par value

 

$

32

 

$

592

 

$

624

 

$

55

 

$

43

 

$

152

 

$

250

 

$

874

 

Amortized cost

 

$

27

 

$

376

 

$

403

 

$

55

 

$

43

 

$

152

 

$

250

 

$

653

 

Fair value

 

$

17

 

$

236

 

$

253

 

$

45

 

$

31

 

$

97

 

$

173

 

$

426

 

Gross unrealized losses

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total

 

$

(10

)

$

(140

)

$

(150

)

$

(10

)

$

(12

)

$

(55

)

$

(77

)

$

(227

)

12-24 months

 

$

 

$

(1

)

$

(1

)

$

 

$

 

$

 

$

 

$

(1

)

Over 24 months (2)

 

$

(10

)

$

(139

)

$

(149

)

$

(10

)

$

(12

)

$

(55

)

$

(77

)

$

(226

)

Cumulative write-downs recognized

 

$

(5

)

$

(209

)

$

(214

)

$

 

$

 

$

 

$

 

$

(214

)

Principal payments received during the period

 

$

4

 

$

16

 

$

20

 

$

13

 

$

1

 

$

5

 

$

19

 

$

39

 

 


(1)

Actual cumulative realized principal losses on the below investment grade Subprime securities we own, as reported by the trust servicers, were $18 million as of March 31, 2011.

(2)

As of March 31, 2011, $116 million of unrealized losses on securities with other-than-temporary impairments recognized in earnings and $73 million of unrealized losses on securities without other-than-temporary impairments recognized in earnings have been greater than or equal to 20% of those securities’ amortized cost for a period of more than 24 consecutive months. As of December 31, 2010, $123 million of unrealized losses on securities with other-than-temporary impairments recognized in earnings and $63 million of unrealized losses on securities without other-than-temporary impairments recognized in earnings have been greater than or equal to 20% of those securities’ amortized cost for a period of more than 24 consecutive months.

 

The above tables include information only about below investment grade Subprime securities with gross unrealized losses that are not reliably insured as of each period presented.  As such, the par value and composition of securities included can vary significantly from period to period due to changes in variables such as credit ratings, principal payments, sales, purchases and realized principal losses.

 

As of March 31, 2011, our Subprime securities that are reliably insured include 9 below investment grade Subprime securities with a total fair value of $82 million and aggregate gross unrealized losses of $33 million, all of which are rated B.  These securities are insured by one bond insurer rated B that we estimate has sufficient claims paying capacity to service its obligations on these securities.  The securitization trusts from which our securities were issued are currently receiving contractual payments from the bond insurer and considering the combination of expected future payments from the bond insurer and cash flows available from the underlying collateral, we expect

 

57



 

the trust to have adequate cash flows to make all contractual payments due to the class of securities we own.  As a result, our security-specific estimates of future cash flows indicate that these securities’ estimated recovery values equal or exceed their amortized cost.  Accordingly, no other-than-temporary impairments have been recognized on these securities.  As of December 31, 2010, our Subprime securities that are reliably insured included 9 below investment grade Subprime securities with a total fair value of $64 million and aggregate gross unrealized losses of $56 million.

 

As of March 31, 2011, our below investment grade Subprime securities with gross unrealized losses that are not reliably insured and without other-than-temporary impairments recorded in earnings had incurred actual cumulative collateral losses of 6.3%.  Our impairment evaluation forecasts more severe assumptions than the trusts are actually experiencing, including a projected weighted average underlying default rate of 46.7% and a projected weighted average loss severity of 69.8%, which resulted in projected additional collateral losses of 32.2%.  As the average remaining credit enhancement for these securities of 43.4% exceeds the projected additional collateral losses of 32.2%, these securities have not been impaired.

 

As of March 31, 2011, our below investment grade Subprime securities with gross unrealized losses that are not reliably insured and with other-than-temporary impairments recorded in earnings had incurred actual cumulative collateral losses of 16.1%.  Our impairment evaluation forecasts more severe assumptions than the trusts are actually experiencing, including a projected weighted average underlying default rate of 53.5% and a projected weighted average loss severity of 77.9%, which resulted in projected additional collateral losses of 40.6%.  As the average remaining credit enhancement for these securities of 18.2% is insufficient to withstand the projected additional collateral losses, we have recognized cumulative write-downs in earnings on the securities as reflected in the table above using our calculated recovery value at the time of impairment.  The current average recovery value of these securities as a percentage of par was 70.1% and exceeded these securities’ current average amortized cost as a percentage of par of 67.0%, which demonstrates our conclusion that the nature of the remaining unrealized loss on these securities is temporary and will reverse over time.  The comparison indicates that recovery value exceeds amortized cost based on a comprehensive evaluation of financial, economic and capital markets assumptions developed for this reporting period.

 

We believe the unrealized losses on our Subprime securities, including those over 24 months, result from the current risk premium on these securities, which should continue to reverse over the securities’ remaining lives, as demonstrated by improved valuations in 2010.  We expect to receive our estimated share of contractual principal and interest collections used to determine the securities’ recovery value.  As of March 31, 2011, we do not have the intent to sell and it is not more likely than not we will be required to sell these securities before the recovery of their amortized cost basis.  We believe that our valuation and impairment processes are comprehensive, employ the most current views about collateral and securitization trust financial positions, and demonstrate our recorded impairments and that the remaining unrealized losses on these positions are temporary.

 

Other-than-temporary impairment assessment for below investment grade CMBS

 

As of March 31, 2011, the fair value of our below investment grade CMBS with gross unrealized losses totaled $157 million compared to $136 million as of December 31, 2010.  As of March 31, 2011, gross unrealized losses for our below investment grade CMBS portfolio totaled $85 million, a decrease of 36.1% compared to $133 million as of December 31, 2010, due to improved valuations resulting from lower risk premiums, impairment write-downs, sales and principal collections, partially offset by downgrades of certain CMBS to below investment grade during the first quarter of 2011.  For our below investment grade CMBS with gross unrealized gains totaling $4 million, we have recognized cumulative write-downs in earnings totaling $9 million as of March 31, 2011.

 

The credit loss evaluation for CMBS with gross unrealized losses is performed in two phases.  The first phase estimates the future cash flows of the entire securitization trust from which our security was issued.  A critical part of this estimate involves forecasting the collateral losses of the commercial mortgage loans that collateralize the securitization trust.  Factors affecting these estimates include, but are not limited to, estimates of current and future commercial property prices, current and projected rental incomes, the propensity of the mortgage loans to default under these assumptions and loss severities in cases of default.  Estimates of future property prices and rental incomes consider specific property-type and geographic economic trends such as employment, property vacancy and rental rates, and forecasts of new supply in the commercial real estate markets.  Estimates of default rates and loss severities consider factors such as borrower payment history, the origination practices of the transaction sponsor, overall collateral quality and diversification, transaction vintage year, maturity date, overall transaction structure and other factors that may influence performance.  Realized losses in the CMBS market have historically been low and, we believe, are not predictive of future

 

58



 

losses.  Therefore, our projections of collateral performance rely on probability-weighted scenarios informed by credit opinions obtained from third parties, such as nationally recognized credit rating agencies, industry analysts and CMBS loss modeling advisory services.

 

We then analyze the actual cumulative collateral losses incurred to date by the securitization trust, our projected additional collateral losses expected to be incurred and the position of the class of securities we own in the securitization trust relative to the trust’s other classes to determine whether any of the collateral losses will be applied to our class.  If our class has remaining credit enhancement sufficient to withstand the projected additional collateral losses, no collateral losses will be realized by our class and we expect to collect all contractual principal and interest of the security we own.  Remaining credit enhancement is measured in terms of subordination from other classes of securities in the trust being contractually obligated to absorb losses before the class of security we own.

 

For securities where there is insufficient remaining credit enhancement for the class of securities we own, a recovery value is calculated based on our best estimate of future cash flows specific to that security.  This estimate is based on the contractual principal payments and current interest payments of the securities we own, adjusted for actual cumulative collateral losses incurred to date and the projected additional collateral losses expected to be incurred.  In instances where the recovery value of the security is less than its amortized cost, a credit loss is recorded in earnings.

 

15.2%, 74.7% and 7.3% of the fair value of our below investment grade CMBS with gross unrealized losses were issued with Aaa, Aa and A original ratings and capital structure classifications, respectively.  As described previously, CMBS with higher original ratings typically have priority in receiving the principal repayments on the underlying collateral compared to those with lower original ratings.  Tight credit markets and conservative underwriting standards continue to stress commercial mortgage borrowers’ ability to refinance obligations.  While the projected cash flow assumptions for our below investment grade CMBS with gross unrealized losses have deteriorated since the securities were originated, as reflected by their current credit ratings, these securities continue to retain the payment priority features that existed at the origination of the securitization trust.

 

The following tables show trust-level, class-level and security-specific detailed information for our below investment grade CMBS with gross unrealized losses, by credit rating.

 

 

 

March 31, 2011

 

 

 

With other-than-temporary
impairments recorded in earnings

 

Without other-than-temporary
impairments recorded in earnings

 

 

 

($ in millions)

 

Ba

 

B

 

Caa or
lower

 

Total

 

Ba

 

B

 

Caa or
lower

 

Total

 

Total

 

Trust-level

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Actual cumulative collateral losses incurred to date (1)

 

0.7

%

3.2

%

4.8

%

4.0

%

1.4

%

0.7

%

%

1.2

%

n/a

 

Projected additional collateral losses to be incurred

 

6.1

%

7.0

%

64.5

%

47.6

%

6.9

%

4.4

%

%

6.1

%

n/a

 

Class-level

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Average remaining credit enhancement

 

11.8

%

7.2

%

26.0

%

21.1

%

9.0

%

7.0

%

%

8.3

%

n/a

 

Security-specific

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Number of positions

 

3

 

1

 

4

 

8

 

12

 

6

 

1

 

19

 

27

 

Par value

 

$

13

 

$

16

 

$

69

 

$

98

 

$

118

 

$

54

 

$

3

 

$

175

 

$

273

 

Amortized cost

 

$

13

 

$

15

 

$

31

 

$

59

 

$

125

 

$

55

 

$

3

 

$

183

 

$

242

 

Fair value

 

$

10

 

$

11

 

$

12

 

$

33

 

$

88

 

$

35

 

$

1

 

$

124

 

$

157

 

Gross unrealized losses

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total

 

$

(3

)

$

(4

)

$

(19

)

$

(26

)

$

(37

)

$

(20

)

$

(2

)

$

(59

)

$

(85

)

12-24 months

 

$

 

$

 

$

 

$

 

$

 

$

 

$

 

$

 

$

 

Over 24 months (2)

 

$

(3

)

$

(4

)

$

(19

)

$

(26

)

$

(37

)

$

(20

)

$

(2

)

$

(59

)

$

(85

)

Cumulative write-downs recognized

 

$

(2

)

$

(2

)

$

(38

)

$

(42

)

$

 

$

 

$

 

$

 

$

(42

)

Principal payments received during the period

 

$

 

$

 

$

1

 

$

1

 

$

 

$

 

$

 

$

 

$

1

 

 

59



 

 

 

December 31, 2010

 

 

 

With other-than-temporary
impairments recorded in earnings

 

Without other-than-temporary
impairments recorded in earnings

 

 

 

 

 

Ba

 

B

 

Caa or
lower

 

Total

 

Ba

 

B

 

Caa or
lower

 

Total

 

Total

 

Trust-level

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Actual cumulative collateral losses incurred to date

 

0.6

%

3.2

%

2.5

%

2.3

%

1.1

%

0.3

%

0.4

%

0.9

%

n/a

 

Projected additional collateral losses to be incurred

 

12.2

%

7.0

%

38.1

%

29.2

%

7.0

%

4.4

%

7.2

%

6.4

%

n/a

 

Class-level

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Average remaining credit enhancement

 

12.5

%

7.0

%

25.5

%

20.7

%

9.1

%

7.5

%

9.0

%

8.7

%

n/a

 

Security-specific

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Number of positions

 

2

 

1

 

5

 

8

 

14

 

5

 

2

 

21

 

29

 

Par value

 

$

22

 

$

16

 

$

79

 

$

117

 

$

138

 

$

46

 

$

7

 

$

191

 

$

308

 

Amortized cost

 

$

17

 

$

15

 

$

39

 

$

71

 

$

143

 

$

47

 

$

8

 

$

198

 

$

269

 

Fair value

 

$

13

 

$

6

 

$

13

 

$

32

 

$

75

 

$

25

 

$

4

 

$

104

 

$

136

 

Gross unrealized losses

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total

 

$

(4

)

$

(9

)

$

(26

)

$

(39

)

$

(68

)

$

(22

)

$

(4

)

$

(94

)

$

(133

)

12-24 months

 

$

 

$

 

$

 

$

 

$

 

$

 

$

 

$

 

$

 

Over 24 months (2)

 

$

(4

)

$

(9

)

$

(26

)

$

(39

)

$

(68

)

$

(22

)

$

(4

)

$

(94

)

$

(133

)

Cumulative write-downs recognized

 

$

(5

)

$

(2

)

$

(41

)

$

(48

)

$

 

$

 

$

 

$

 

$

(48

)

Principal payments received during the period

 

$

 

$

 

$

1

 

$

1

 

$

 

$

1

 

$

 

$

1

 

$

2

 

 


(1)         There were no actual cumulative realized principal losses on the below investment grade CMBS we own, as reported by the trust servicers, as of March 31, 2011.

(2)         As of March 31, 2011, $25 million of unrealized losses on securities with other-than-temporary impairments recognized in earnings and $58 million of unrealized losses on securities without other-than-temporary impairments recognized in earnings have been greater than or equal to 20% of those securities’ amortized cost for a period of more than 24 consecutive months.  As of December 31, 2010, $39 million of unrealized losses on securities with other-than-temporary impairments recognized in earnings and $93 million of unrealized losses on securities without other-than-temporary impairments recognized in earnings have been greater than or equal to 20% of those securities’ amortized cost for a period of more than 24 consecutive months.

 

The above tables include information about below investment grade CMBS with gross unrealized losses as of each period presented.  The par value and composition of securities included can vary significantly from period to period due to changes in variables such as credit ratings, principal payments, sales and purchases.

 

Our impairment evaluation for CMBS forecasts more severe assumptions than the trusts are actually experiencing.  We assume that all loans delinquent 60 days or more default and project default rates on otherwise performing loans.  Projected loss severities are then applied against the resulting default rates, arriving at our projected additional collateral loss rates.  The projected additional collateral loss rates by vintage year of our CMBS portfolio range from a low of 1.9% for holdings with a vintage year of 2003 to a high of 12.3% for holdings with a vintage year of 2005.

 

As of March 31, 2011, our below investment grade CMBS with gross unrealized losses and without other-than-temporary impairments recorded in earnings had incurred actual cumulative collateral losses of 1.2%, and the projected additional collateral loss rate for these securities as of March 31, 2011 was 6.1%.  As the average remaining credit enhancement for these securities of 8.3% exceeds the projected additional collateral losses of 6.1%, these securities have not been impaired.

 

As of March 31, 2011, our below investment grade CMBS with gross unrealized losses and with other-than-temporary impairments recorded in earnings had incurred actual cumulative collateral losses of 4.0%.  The projected additional collateral loss rate for these securities as of March 31, 2011 was 47.6%.  As the average remaining credit enhancement for these securities of 21.1% is insufficient to withstand the projected additional collateral losses, we have recognized cumulative write-downs in earnings on these securities as reflected in the table above using our calculated recovery value at the time of impairment.  The current average recovery value of these securities as a percentage of par was 59.4% and exceeded these securities’ current average amortized cost as a percentage of par of 58.7%, which demonstrates our conclusion that the nature of the remaining unrealized loss on these securities is temporary and will reverse over time.  The comparison indicates that recovery value is in line with amortized cost as impairment write-downs were recorded in the reporting period based on a comprehensive evaluation of financial, economic and capital markets assumptions developed for this reporting period.

 

We believe the unrealized losses on our CMBS, including those over 24 months, result from the current risk premium on these securities, which should continue to reverse over the securities’ remaining lives, as demonstrated by improved valuations during 2010.  We expect to receive our estimated share of contractual principal and interest

 

60



 

collections used to determine the securities’ recovery value.  As of March 31, 2011, we do not have the intent to sell and it is not more likely than not we will be required to sell these securities before the recovery of their amortized cost basis.  We believe that our valuation and impairment processes are comprehensive, employ the most current views about collateral and securitization trust financial positions, and demonstrate our recorded impairments and that the remaining unrealized losses on these positions are temporary.

 

Problem, restructured, or potential problem securities

 

We also monitor the quality of our fixed income and bank loan portfolios by categorizing certain investments as “problem”, “restructured” or “potential problem.”  Problem fixed income securities and bank loans are in default with respect to principal or interest and/or are investments issued by companies that have gone into bankruptcy subsequent to our acquisition or loan.  Fixed income and bank loan investments are categorized as restructured when the debtor is experiencing financial difficulty and we grant a concession.  Potential problem fixed income or bank loan investments are current with respect to contractual principal and/or interest, but because of other facts and circumstances, we have concerns regarding the borrower’s ability to pay future principal and interest according to the original terms, which causes us to believe these investments may be classified as problem or restructured in the future.

 

The following table summarizes problem, restructured and potential problem fixed income securities and bank loans, which are reported in other investments.

 

($ in millions)

 

March 31, 2011

 

 

 

Par
value 
(1)

 

Amortized
cost 
(1)

 

Amortized
cost as a
percent of
par value

 

Fair
value (2)

 

Fair value as a
percent of

par value

 

Percent of
total fixed
income and
bank loan
portfolios

 

Restructured

 

$

68

 

$

53

 

77.9

%

$

55

 

80.9

%

0.1

%

Problem

 

354

 

81

 

22.9

 

66

 

18.6

 

0.1

 

Potential problem

 

1,726

 

811

 

47.0

 

654

 

37.9

 

1.4

 

Total

 

$

2,148

 

$

945

 

44.0

 

$

775

 

36.1

 

1.6

%

Cumulative write-downs recognized (3)

 

 

 

$

567

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

December 31, 2010

 

 

 

Par
value
 (1)

 

Amortized
cost
 (1)

 

Amortized
cost as a
percent of
par value

 

Fair
value (2)

 

Fair value as a
percent of

par value

 

Percent of
total fixed
income and
bank loan
portfolios

 

Restructured

 

$

68

 

$

52

 

76.5

%

$

55

%

80.9

%

0.1

%

Problem

 

414

 

92

 

22.2

 

77

 

18.6

 

0.2

 

Potential problem

 

2,468

 

867

 

35.1

 

687

 

27.8

 

1.4

 

Total

 

$

2,950

 

$

1,011

 

34.3

 

$

819

 

27.8

 

1.7

%

Cumulative write-downs recognized (3)

 

 

 

$

659

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


(1)         The difference between par value and amortized cost of $1.20 billion and $1.94 billion as of March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively, is primarily attributable to write-downs and a zero-coupon security.

(2)         Bank loans are reflected at amortized cost.

(3)         Cumulative write-downs recognized only reflect impairment write-downs related to investments within the problem, potential problem and restructured categories.

 

As of March 31, 2011, amortized cost for the problem category was $81 million and comprised $45 million of Subprime, $16 million of Alt-A, $7 million of municipal bonds, $6 million of corporates (primarily privately placed), $4 million of CDO, and $3 million of Consumer and other ABS.

 

As of March 31, 2011, amortized cost for the potential problem category was $811 million and comprised $371 million of Subprime, $178 million of Alt-A, $90 million of Prime, $62 million of CMBS, $55 million of CDO, $35 million of corporates (primarily privately placed), $14 million of municipal bonds, $3 million of bank loans and $3 million of Consumer and other ABS.

 

61



 

Net investment income The following table presents net investment income.

 

 

 

Three months ended
March 31,

 

($ in millions)

 

2011

 

2010

 

Fixed income securities

 

$

591

 

$

635

 

Mortgage loans

 

88

 

101

 

Equity securities

 

1

 

1

 

Limited partnership interests

 

5

 

3

 

Short-term investments

 

1

 

1

 

Other

 

3

 

(8

)

Investment income, before expense

 

689

 

733

 

Investment expense

 

(27

)

(26

)

Net investment income

 

$

662

 

$

707

 

 

Net investment income decreased 6.4% or $45 million to $662 million in the first quarter of 2011 from $707 million in the same period of 2010 primarily due to reduced average investment balances.  Net investment income was $683 million and $670 million in the third and fourth quarter of 2010, respectively.

 

Realized capital gains and losses  The following table presents the components of realized capital gains and losses and the related tax effect.

 

 

 

Three months ended
March 31,

 

($ in millions)

 

2011

 

2010

 

Impairment write-downs

 

$

(47

)

$

(142

)

Change in intent write-downs

 

(42

)

(23

)

Net other-than-temporary impairment losses recognized in earnings

 

(89

)

(165

)

Sales

 

112

 

43

 

Valuation of derivative instruments

 

(2

)

(54

)

Settlements of derivative instruments

 

6

 

19

 

EMA limited partnership income

 

18

 

(4

)

Realized capital gains and losses, pre-tax

 

45

 

(161

)

Income tax (expense) benefit

 

(15

)

57

 

Realized capital gains and losses, after-tax

 

$

30

 

$

(104

)

 

Impairment write-downs are presented in the following table.

 

 

 

Three months ended
March 31,

 

($ in millions)

 

2011

 

2010

 

Fixed income securities

 

$

(39

)

$

(118

)

Mortgage loans

 

(2

)

(13

)

Equity securities

 

(5

)

 

Limited partnership interests

 

 

(11

)

Other investments

 

(1

)

 

Impairment write-downs

 

$

(47

)

$

(142

)

 

Impairment write-downs for the three months ended March 31, 2011 were primarily driven by investments with commercial real estate exposure, including CMBS, equity securities and mortgage loans, which were impacted by lower real estate valuations or experienced deterioration in expected cash flows, and RMBS, which experienced deterioration in expected cash flows.  Impairment write-downs on below investment grade CMBS, RMBS and ABS for the three months ended March 31, 2011 were $20 million, $11 million and $2 million, respectively.

 

Impairment write-downs that were related primarily to securities subsequently disposed were $9 million for the three months ended March 31, 2011.  Of the remaining write-downs for the three months ended March 31, 2011, $24 million or 80.0% of the fixed income security write-downs related to impaired securities that were performing in line with anticipated or contractual cash flows but were written down primarily because of expected deterioration in the performance of the underlying collateral or our assessment of the probability of future default.  For these

 

62



 

securities, as of March 31, 2011, there were either no defaults or defaults only impacted classes lower than our position in the capital structure.  $6 million of the fixed income security write-downs for the three months ended March 31, 2011 related to securities experiencing a significant departure from anticipated cash flows; however, we believe they retain economic value.

 

Change in intent write-downs are presented in the following table.

 

($ in millions)

 

Three months ended
March 31,

 

 

 

2011

 

2010

 

Fixed income securities

 

$

(42

)

$

(17

)

Mortgage loans

 

 

(6

)

Change in intent write-downs

 

$

(42

)

$

(23

)

 

The change in intent write-downs in the three months ended March 31, 2011 were primarily a result of ongoing comprehensive reviews of our portfolios resulting in write-downs of individually identified investments, primarily lower yielding, floating rate RMBS and municipal bonds.

 

Sales generated $112 million of net realized gains for the three months ended March 31, 2011 primarily due to $20 million of net gains on the sale of our convertible bond portfolio and $71 million of net gains on sales of other corporate, U.S. and foreign government and ABS securities.

 

Valuation and settlement of derivative instruments net realized capital gains totaling $4 million for the three months ended March 31, 2011 included $2 million of losses on the valuation of derivative instruments and $6 million of gains on the settlement of derivative instruments.

 

Net realized capital gains and losses from our risk management derivative programs are primarily driven by changes in risk-free interest rates, volatility and credit spreads during a given period.  Net realized capital gains and losses from our income generation derivative programs are primarily driven by changes in the fair value of the reference entities or indices underlying the derivative instruments.

 

A changing interest rate environment will drive changes in our portfolio duration management which is established with an economic view of liabilities relative to a long-term investment portfolio view.  Tactical duration management is accomplished through both cash market transactions, sales and new purchases, and derivative activities that generate realized gains and losses.  As a component of our approach to managing portfolio duration, realized gains and losses on certain derivative instruments are most appropriately considered in conjunction with the unrealized gains and losses on the fixed income portfolio.  This approach mitigates the impacts of general interest rate changes to our overall financial condition.

 

As of March 31, 2011, our securities with embedded derivatives totaled $377 million, a decrease in fair value of $297 million from December 31, 2010, comprising net sales activity of $319 million primarily related to the sale of our convertible bond portfolio, realized capital losses on valuation of $1 million and unrealized net capital gains reported in OCI of $23 million for the host securities.  Unrealized net capital gains were further decreased by $1 million due to amortization of the host securities.  The change in fair value of embedded derivatives is bifurcated from the host securities, separately valued and reported in realized capital gains and losses, while the change in the difference between the fair value and the amortized cost of the host securities is reported in OCI.  Total fair value exceeded total amortized cost by $8 million as of March 31, 2011.  Valuation gains and losses for securities with embedded derivatives are converted into cash upon our election to sell these securities.  In the event the economic value of the embedded options is not realized, we will recover the par value if held to maturity unless the issuer of the security defaults.  In the event there are defaults by the referenced credit entities of the embedded credit default swap, our loss is limited to the par value of the combined fixed income security, net of applicable recoveries.  Total par value exceeded fair value by $107 million as of March 31, 2011.

 

63



 

The table below presents the realized capital gains and losses (pre-tax) on the valuation and settlement of derivative instruments shown by underlying exposure and derivative strategy.

 

($ in millions)

 

Three months ended March 31,

 

 

 

 

 

2011

 

2010

 

 

 

 

 

Valuation

 

Settlements

 

Total

 

Total

 

2011 Explanations

 

Risk reduction

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Duration gap management

 

$

(13

)

$

15

 

$

2

 

$

(43

)

Interest rate caps, floors, swaptions, swaps and interest rate futures are used to balance interest-rate sensitivities of its assets and liabilities. The contracts settle based on differences between current market rates and a contractually specified fixed rate through expiration. The contracts can be terminated and settled at any time with minimal additional cost. The maximum loss on caps, floors and swaptions is limited to the amount of premiums paid. The change in valuation reflects the changing value of expected future settlements from changing interest rates, which may vary over the period of the contracts. The futures contracts are exchange traded, daily cash settled and can be exited at any time for minimal additional cost. The 2011 valuation losses primarily relate to losses on interest rate swaps resulting from increasing interest rates in the current year and are offset by gains on settlements resulting from decreases in interest rates over the life of the interest rate swaps acquired prior to 2011. The valuation losses and settlement gains are offset in unrealized capital gains and losses of our fixed income securities in OCI to the extent it relates to changes in risk-free rates.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Anticipatory hedging

 

 

 

 

20

 

Futures and interest rate swaps are used to protect investment spread from interest rate changes during mismatches in the timing of cash flows between product sales and the related investment activity. The futures contracts are exchange traded, daily cash settled and can be exited at any time for minimal additional cost. If the cash flow mismatches are such that a positive net investment position is being hedged, there is an offset for the related investment’s unrealized loss in OCI.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Hedging of interest rate exposure in annuity contracts

 

 

 

 

(9

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Hedge ineffectiveness

 

3

 

(11

)

(8

)

 

The hedge ineffectiveness of $8 million includes $28 million in realized capital losses on swaps that were offset by $20 million in realized capital gains on the hedged risk.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Foreign currency contracts

 

 

 

 

4

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Credit risk reduction

 

(1

)

(1

)

(2

)

 

Losses are the result of tightening credit spreads on referenced credit entities.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total Risk reduction

 

(11

)

3

 

(8

)

(28

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Income generation

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Asset replication -credit exposure

 

10

 

3

 

13

 

(2

)

The 2011 changes in valuation are due to the tightening credit spreads on referenced credit entities. The gains are primarily on first-to-default credit default swaps (“CDS”) and single name CDS. The changes in valuation would only be converted to cash upon disposition, which can be done at any time, or if the credit event specified in the contract occurs. For further discussion on CDS, see Note 6 of the condensed consolidated financial statements.

 

Accounting

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Equity indexed notes

 

3

 

 

3

 

(4

)

Equity-indexed notes are fixed income securities that contain embedded options. The changes in valuation of the embedded equity indexed call options are reported in realized capital gains and losses. The results generally track the performance of underlying equity indices. Valuation gains and losses are converted into cash upon sale or maturity. In the event the economic value of the options is not realized, we will recover the par value of the host fixed income security if held to maturity unless the issuer of the note defaults. Par value exceeded fair value by $13 million as of March 31, 2011. Equity-indexed notes are subject to our comprehensive portfolio monitoring and watchlist processes to identify and evaluate when the carrying value may be other-than-temporarily impaired. The following table compares the March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010 holdings, respectively.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

($ in millions)

 

March 31,
2011

 

Change in
fair value

 

Change due
to net sale
activity

 

December 31,
2010

 

 

 

Par value

 

$

300

 

$

 

$

 

$

300

 

 

 

Amortized cost of host contract

 

$

227

 

$

3

 

$

 

$

224

 

 

 

Fair value of equity-indexed call option

 

50

 

3

 

 

47

 

 

 

Total amortized cost

 

$

277

 

$

6

 

$

 

$

271

 

 

 

Total fair value

 

$

287

 

$

8

 

$

 

$

279

 

 

 

Unrealized gain/loss

 

$

10

 

$

2

 

$

 

$

8

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Conversion options in fixed income securities

 

(5

)

 

(5

)

(1

)

We sold our convertible bond portfolio during the first quarter of 2011. As of March 31, 2011, the fair value of our holdings was $5 million.

 

 

64


 


 

($ in millions)

 

Three months ended March 31,

 

 

 

 

 

2011

 

2010

 

 

 

 

 

Valuation

 

Settlements

 

Total

 

Total

 

2011 Explanations

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

CDS in fixed income securities

 

1

 

 

1

 

 

Synthetic CDO’s are fixed income securities that contain embedded CDS. Changes in valuation of the embedded credit default swap are reported in realized capital gains and losses. The embedded credit default swap increases or decreases in value as referenced credit entities’ credit spreads tighten or widen, respectively. Credit events, changes in interest rates, correlations of the referenced entities and assumed recovery rates are among some of the other factors affecting the value of the embedded credit default swap. In the event a referenced credit entity experiences a credit event, our loss is limited to the par value of the fixed income security. Losses on credit events are net of recovery. Par value exceeded fair value by $94 million as of March 31, 2011. Synthetic CDO’s are subject to our comprehensive portfolio monitoring and watchlist processes to identify and evaluate when the carrying value may be other-than-temporarily impaired. The following table compares the March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010 holdings, respectively.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

($ in millions)

 

March 31,
2011

 

Change in
fair value

 

Change due
to net sale
activity

 

December 31,
2010

 

 

 

Par value

 

$

179

 

$

 

$

 

$

179

 

 

 

Amortized cost of host contract

 

$

173

 

$

(3

)

$

 

$

176

 

 

 

Fair value of credit default swap

 

(86

)

1

 

 

(87

)

 

 

Total amortized cost

 

$

87

 

$

(2

)

$

 

$

89

 

 

 

Total fair value

 

$

85

 

$

8

 

$

 

$

77

 

 

 

Unrealized gain/loss

 

$

(2

)

$

10

 

$

 

$

(12

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total Accounting

 

(1

)

 

(1

)

(5

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total

 

$

(2

)

$

6

 

$

4

 

$

(35

)

 

 

 

CAPITAL RESOURCES AND LIQUIDITY

 

Capital resources consist of shareholder’s equity and notes due to related parties, representing funds deployed or available to be deployed to support business operations.  The following table summarizes our capital resources.

 

($ in millions)

 

March 31,
2011

 

December 31,
2010

 

Common stock, retained income and additional capital paid-in

 

$

5,194

 

$

5,107

 

Accumulated other comprehensive income

 

650

 

525

 

Total shareholder’s equity

 

5,844

 

5,632

 

Notes due to related parties

 

686

 

677

 

Total capital resources

 

$

6,530

 

$

6,309

 

 

Shareholder’s equity increased in the first three months of 2011, due to increased unrealized net capital gains on investments and net income.

 

Financial ratings and strength  Our ratings are influenced by many factors including our operating and financial performance, asset quality, liquidity, asset/liability management, overall portfolio mix, financial leverage (i.e., debt), exposure to risks, the current level of operating leverage and Allstate Insurance Company’s (“AIC’s”) ratings.  There have been no changes to our insurance financial strength ratings from Moody’s, S&P and A.M. Best since December 31, 2010.

 

The Company, AIC and The Allstate Corporation (the “Corporation”) are party to the Amended and Restated Intercompany Liquidity Agreement (“Liquidity Agreement”) which allows for short-term advances of funds to be made between parties for liquidity and other general corporate purposes.  The Liquidity Agreement does not establish a commitment to advance funds on the part of any party.  The Company and AIC each serve as a lender and borrower and the Corporation serves only as a lender.  The Company also has a capital support agreement with AIC.  Under the capital support agreement, AIC is committed to provide capital to the Company to maintain an adequate capital level.  The maximum amount of potential funding under each of these agreements is $1.00 billion.

 

In addition to the Liquidity Agreement, the Company also has an intercompany loan agreement with the Corporation.  The amount of intercompany loans available to the Company is at the discretion of the Corporation.  The maximum amount of loans the Corporation will have outstanding to all its eligible subsidiaries at any given

 

65



 

point in time is limited to $1.00 billion.  The Corporation may use commercial paper borrowings, bank lines of credit and repurchase agreements to fund intercompany borrowings.

 

Liquidity sources and uses  We actively manage our financial position and liquidity levels in light of changing market, economic, and business conditions.  Liquidity is managed at both the entity and enterprise level across the Company, and is assessed on both base and stressed level liquidity needs.  We believe we have sufficient liquidity to meet these needs.  Additionally, we have existing intercompany agreements in place that facilitate liquidity management across the Company to enhance flexibility.

 

Allstate parent holding company capital capacity The Corporation has at the parent holding company level $3.65 billion of deployable invested assets as of March 31, 2011.  These assets include investments that are generally saleable within one quarter totaling $3.21 billion.  This provides funds for the parent company’s relatively low fixed charges.

 

The Company has access to additional borrowing to support liquidity through the Corporation as follows:

·                  A commercial paper facility with a borrowing limit of $1.00 billion to cover short-term cash needs.  As of March 31, 2011, there were no balances outstanding and therefore the remaining borrowing capacity was $1.00 billion; however, the outstanding balance can fluctuate daily.

·                  A primary credit facility is available for short-term liquidity requirements and backs the commercial paper facility.  The $1.00 billion unsecured revolving credit facility has an initial term of five years expiring in 2012 with two optional one-year extensions that can be exercised at the end of any of the remaining anniversary years of the facility upon approval of existing or replacement lenders providing more than two-thirds of the commitments to lend.  The program is fully subscribed among 11 lenders with the largest commitment being $185 million.  The commitments of the lenders are several and no lender is responsible for any other lender’s commitment if such lender fails to make a loan under the facility.  This facility contains an increase provision that would allow up to an additional $500 million of borrowing provided the increased portion could be fully syndicated at a later date among existing or new lenders.  This facility has a financial covenant requiring that the Corporation not exceed a 37.5% debt to capital resources ratio as defined in the agreement.  This ratio as of March 31, 2011 was 19.2%.  Although the right to borrow under the facility is not subject to a minimum rating requirement, the costs of maintaining the facility and borrowing under it are based on the ratings of the Corporation’s senior, unsecured, nonguaranteed long-term debt.  There were no borrowings under the credit facility during the first three months of 2011.  The total amount outstanding at any point in time under the combination of the commercial paper program and the credit facility cannot exceed the amount that can be borrowed under the credit facility.

·                  A universal shelf registration statement was filed by the Corporation with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 8, 2009.  The Corporation can use the current shelf registration to issue an unspecified amount of debt securities, common stock (including 376 million shares of treasury stock as of March 31, 2011), preferred stock, depositary shares, warrants, stock purchase contracts, stock purchase units and securities of trust subsidiaries.  The specific terms of any securities the Corporation issues under this registration statement will be provided in the applicable prospectus supplements.

 

66



 

Liquidity Exposure  Contractholder funds as of March 31, 2011 were $45.15 billion.  The following table summarizes contractholder funds by their contractual withdrawal provisions as of March 31, 2011.

 

($ in millions)

 

 

 

Percent
to total

 

Not subject to discretionary withdrawal

 

$

6,289

 

13.9

%

Subject to discretionary withdrawal with adjustments:

 

 

 

 

 

Specified surrender charges (1)

 

18,750

 

41.5

 

Market value adjustments (2)

 

7,534

 

16.7

 

Subject to discretionary withdrawal without adjustments (3) 

 

12,575

 

27.9

 

Total contractholder funds (4)

 

$

45,148

 

100.0

%

 

 

 

 

 

 


 

(1)        Includes $9.24 billion of liabilities with a contractual surrender charge of less than 5% of the account balance.

 

(2)        $6.28 billion of the contracts with market value adjusted surrenders have a 30-45 day period at the end of their initial and subsequent interest rate guarantee periods (which are typically 5 or 6 years) during which there is no surrender charge or market value adjustment.

 

(3)        68% of these contracts have a minimum interest crediting rate guarantee of 3% or higher.

 

(4)      Includes $1.16 billion of contractholder funds on variable annuities reinsured to The Prudential Insurance Company of America, a subsidiary of Prudential Financial, Inc., in 2006.

 

 

While we are able to quantify remaining scheduled maturities for our institutional products, anticipating retail product surrenders is less precise.  Retail life and annuity products may be surrendered by customers for a variety of reasons.  Reasons unique to individual customers include a current or unexpected need for cash or a change in life insurance coverage needs.  Other key factors that may impact the likelihood of customer surrender include the level of the contract surrender charge, the length of time the contract has been in force, distribution channel, market interest rates, equity market conditions and potential tax implications.  In addition, the propensity for retail life insurance policies to lapse is lower than it is for fixed annuities because of the need for the insured to be re-underwritten upon policy replacement.  Surrenders and partial withdrawals for our retail annuities increased 2.7% in the first three months of 2011 compared to the same period of 2010.  The annualized surrender and partial withdrawal rate on deferred annuities and interest-sensitive life insurance, based on the beginning of year contractholder funds, was 10.5% and 9.7% for the first three months of 2011 and 2010, respectively.  We strive to promptly pay customers who request cash surrenders, however, statutory regulations generally provide up to six months in most states to fulfill surrender requests.

 

Our institutional products are primarily funding agreements sold to unaffiliated trusts used to back medium-term notes.  As of March 31, 2011, total institutional products outstanding were $2.15 billion.  The following table presents the remaining scheduled maturities for our institutional products outstanding as of March 31, 2011.

 

($ in millions)

 

 

 

2011

 

$

275

 

2012

 

40

 

2013

 

1,750

 

2016

 

85

 

 

 

$

2,150

 

 

Our asset-liability management practices limit the differences between the cash flows generated by our investment portfolio and the expected cash flow requirements of our life insurance, annuity and institutional product obligations.

 

Cash Flows  As reflected in our Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, lower cash provided by operating cash flows in the first three months of 2011 compared to the first three months of 2010 was primarily due to income tax refunds in the first quarter of 2010.

 

Higher cash provided by investing activities in the first three months of 2011 compared to the first three months of 2010 were impacted by higher net sales of fixed income securities used to fund reductions in contractholder fund liabilities.

 

67


 


 

Lower cash used in financing activities in the first three months of 2011 compared to the first three months of 2010 were primarily due to decreased maturities and retirements of institutional products, partially offset by lower deposits on fixed annuities.

 

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

 

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures.  We maintain disclosure controls and procedures as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.  Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, we conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report.  Based upon this evaluation, the principal executive officer and the principal financial officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are effective in providing reasonable assurance that material information required to be disclosed in our reports filed with or submitted to the Securities and Exchange Commission under the Securities Exchange Act is made known to management, including the principal executive officer and the principal financial officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

 

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting.  During the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2011, there have been no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

 

68



 

PART II.  OTHER INFORMATION

 

Item 1.  Legal Proceedings

 

Information required for Part II, Item 1 is incorporated by reference to the discussion under the heading “Regulation and Compliance” and under the heading “Legal and regulatory proceedings and inquiries” in Note 8 of the condensed consolidated financial statements in Part I, Item 1 of this Form 10-Q.

 

Item 1A.  Risk Factors

 

This document contains “forward-looking statements” that anticipate results based on our estimates, assumptions and plans that are subject to uncertainty.  These statements are made subject to the safe-harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995.  We assume no obligation to update any forward-looking statements as a result of new information or future events or developments.

 

These forward-looking statements do not relate strictly to historical or current facts and may be identified by their use of words like “plans,” “seeks,” “expects,” “will,” “should,” “anticipates,” “estimates,” “intends,” “believes,” “likely,” “targets” and other words with similar meanings.  These statements may address, among other things, our strategy for growth, product development, investment results, regulatory approvals, market position, expenses, financial results, litigation and reserves.  We believe that these statements are based on reasonable estimates, assumptions and plans.  However, if the estimates, assumptions or plans underlying the forward-looking statements prove inaccurate or if other risks or uncertainties arise, actual results could differ materially from those communicated in these forward-looking statements.  Risk factors which could cause actual results to differ materially from those suggested by such forward-looking statements include but are not limited to those discussed or identified in this document, in our public filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, and those incorporated by reference in Part I, Item 1A of the Allstate Life Insurance Company Annual Report on Form 10-K for 2010.

 

Item 6.  Exhibits

 

(a)                                  Exhibits

 

An Exhibit Index has been filed as part of this report on page E-1.

 

69


 


 

SIGNATURE

 

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

 

 

Allstate Life Insurance Company

 

(Registrant)

 

 

 

 

May 4, 2011

 

 

By

/s/ Samuel H. Pilch

 

 

Samuel H. Pilch

 

 

(chief accounting officer and duly
authorized officer of Registrant)

 

70



 

Exhibit No.

 

Description

 

 

 

10.1

 

Form of Asset Purchase Agreement between Allstate Insurance Company and Road Bay Investments, LLC dated as of March 24, 2011.

 

 

 

10.2

 

Form of Pledge and Security Agreement between Road Bay Investments, LLC and Allstate Insurance Company dated as of March 24, 2011.

 

 

 

15

 

Acknowledgment of awareness from Deloitte & Touche LLP, dated May 4, 2011, concerning unaudited interim financial information.

 

 

 

31(i)

 

Rule 13a-14(a) Certification of Principal Executive Officer

 

 

 

31(i)

 

Rule 13a-14(a) Certification of Principal Financial Officer

 

 

 

32

 

Section 1350 Certifications

 

E-1