Exhibit 99.1
Financial Report
January - March 2011
|
|
|
Sales: |
|
$2,109 million |
|
|
Operating margin: |
|
12.1% |
|
|
EPS: |
|
$1.93 |
(Stockholm, April 20, 2011)
For the three-month period ended March 31, 2011, Autoliv Inc. (NYSE: ALV and SSE: ALIV) the worldwide leader in automotive safety systems reported record quarterly sales, operating income, net income and earnings per
share.
Compared to the same quarter 2010, consolidated net sales increased by 23% to $2,109 million with the organic sales portion growing at
a rate of 14%, significantly outperforming global light vehicle production (LVP) which grew by 5%.
Operating income improved by 30% to $255
million, income before taxes by 34% to $240 million, net income by 42% to $182 million and earnings per share assuming dilution by 39% to $1.93.
Operating margin increased to 12.1% from 11.4% for the same quarter 2010.
Cash flow from
operations amounted to $141 million and to $63 million before financing.
For the second quarter of 2011, the Company expects organic sales to
be flat as compared to the same quarter 2010 and consolidated net sales to rise by approximately 9%. An operating margin of around 9% is expected for the quarter. For the full year, the current indications are a sales increase of approximately 15%
with organic sales growing by about 8% and an operating margin of around 11.5%. These forecasts are uncertain due to the difficulties in predicting disruptions at vehicle assembly lines due to unexpected component shortages after the earthquake in
Japan.
An earnings conference call will be held at 3:00 p.m. (CET) today April 20. To follow the webcast or to obtain your pin code
and phone number, please access www.autoliv.com.
Q1 Report 2011
Market Overview
During the three-month period January - March 2011, global light vehicle production (LVP) is estimated by IHS to have increased by 5% compared to the same quarter 2010. This was 1 percentage point (pp)
less than expected by IHS at the beginning of the quarter, due to the earthquake/tsunami in Japan.
In Europe (including Eastern
Europe), where Autoliv derives almost 40% of its revenues, LVP is estimated to have increased by 8%. In Western Europe, the estimated increase was 4% and Eastern Europe 19%.
In The Americas, which accounts for more than 30% of revenues, LVP increased by 14%. Chrysler, General Motors (GM) and Ford increased their North American production by 27%, 18% and
15%, respectively, while the Asian and European vehicle manufacturers increased their North American production by 11%.
In
China, which accounts for just over one tenth of consolidated sales, LVP grew by 9% which was 6 pp more than IHSs expectation in January.
In Japan, which accounts for slightly less than one tenth of Autolivs consolidated sales, LVP dropped by 32%. Before the earthquake in March, Japanese LVP was expected to decline by
7%.
In the Rest of Asia (RoA), which accounts for one tenth of sales, LVP grew by 17%, which was 4 pp more than
expected. This was primarily due to a 22% increase in India. The important South Korean market grew by 14%.
Consolidated Sales
Consolidated sales increased by 23% to $2,109 million compared to the same quarter 2010. Acquisitions (see Significant Events) added 6%
and currency effects 3%. Consequently, organic sales (non-U.S. GAAP measure, see enclosed table) increased by 14%. At the beginning of the quarter, organic sales were expected to increase by more than 10%.
Sales were better than expected in all regions except in Japan, where component shortages caused by the earthquake/tsunami have halted vehicle
production. This reduced Autolivs organic sales by slightly more than $30 million.
Autolivs organic sales growth, which was
nearly three times as much as the LVP growth, was mainly driven by new vehicle models that were launched last year and in which Autoliv has a high supply value.
Sales by Product
Sales of airbag products (including steering wheels and
passive safety electronics) rose by 23% to $1,385 million compared to the same quarter 2010. Acquisitions added slightly less than 6% and currency effects less than 3%. Organic sales of airbag products grew by almost 15%. This was three times as
much as the 5% increase in global LVP. Sales were driven by strong demand for side airbags and electronics for passive safety, and by strong performance with Chrysler, GM and Ford, as well as with Hyundai, Mercedes, Great Wall and Wuling.
Sales of seatbelt products grew by slightly more than 19% to $686 million. Acquisitions added slightly less than 7% and
currency effects less than 3%. The organic
sales increase of just over 10% was twice as much as the 5% increase in global LVP. Sales were driven by
new business, mainly in Europe, China and North America.
Sales of active safety products (automotive radar and night vision
systems) increased by 93% to $37 million and organically by 92%, mainly due to new radar business with Chrysler, higher take-rates at Mercedes and by higher take-rates for night vision systems at BMW and Audi.
Sales by Region
Sales from
Autolivs European companies increased by 12% to $826 million including favorable currency effects of 1%. Organic sales growth of 11% compares favorably with the 8% increase in European LVP. Autolivs strong performance was
primarily due to several new business contracts and vehicle launches (such as the new Ford C-max and Focus; and the Audi A8, A7 and A1), as well as to volume increases for BMWs 5-series and Mini
Countryman; Opels Astra and the Mercedes C-class.
Sales from Autolivs companies in The
Americas rose by 29% to $671 million including favorable currency effects that added 2%. Organic sales growth of 27% was nearly twice as much as the 14% increase in the regions LVP. This was primarily due to a favorable LVP mix
and strong performance of several new models with high safety content such as Fords Edge and new Focus; Chryslers 200 and 300; Dodges Charger; Chevrolets Cruze, Volt and
Impala and Fiats launch of the 500 US.
Sales from Autolivs companies in China rose by 31% to
$230 million. Acquisitions added slightly less than 5% and currency effects less than 4%. Organic sales growth of almost 23% was more than twice as much as Chinese LVP, driven by several vehicle models such as Nissans Qashqai and
Teana; Great Walls Voleex C30; Geelys Emgrand EC7 and EC8; BMWs 5-series, Mercedes E-class; Peugeots 206+ and 308; Hyundais ix35 and Verna;
Chevrolets Cruze; Buicks Excel; Toyotas Reiz and LandCruiser Prado; and the recently launched Wuling Hongguang.
Sales from Autolivs companies in Japan decreased by 5% to $185 million despite the fact that currency effects added 10%. However, the organic sales decline of 15% was 17 pp less than
the drop in Japanese LVP of 32%. This was due to strong sales performance before the earthquake of several recently launched vehicle models with high safety content from Autoliv. Some of these include the Lexus CT; Hondas CRV and
Life; Nissans Safari; Toyotas Ractis and Mazdas CX. Sales were also driven by export sales to South Korea.
Sales from Autolivs companies in the Rest of Asia (RoA) jumped by 107% to $197 million, primarily due to acquisitions that boosted sales by 94%. Excluding the effect of acquisitions
and of currencies that added 3%, organic sales rose by 10%, which was 7% less than the increase in the regions LVP. This reflects an unfavorable LVP mix in India, Thailand and Indonesia where LVP is heavily skewed towards low-end vehicles with
low safety content. This was mitigated by sales in the important South Korean market where organic sales grew in line with the LVP increase.
Q1 Report 2011
Earnings
For the first quarter 2011, Autoliv reported the highest quarterly gross profit, operating income, income before taxes and net income in the Companys history, despite the negative effect from the
earthquake/tsunami in Japan. The all-time-high results are due to the Companys strong sales performance and the results of our restructuring efforts initiated in July 2008.
Gross profit improved by 21% or $82 million to $466 million compared to the same quarter in 2010 due to the sales improvement. However, gross margin declined to 22.1% from 22.3% in the first quarter 2010
due to higher raw material prices that had almost a 1 percentage point (pp) negative effect.
Operating income improved by 30% or $59 million
to $255 million due to the gross profit improvement and $9 million lower operating expense due to less restructuring needs. These favorable effects were partially offset by $23 million higher Research, Development and Engineering (R,D&E)
expense, net and a $10 million higher Selling, General & Administrative (S,G&A) expense, partially due to currency effects and acquisitions. However, in relation to sales, S,G&A expense declined to 4.3% from 4.7% and R,D&E
expense, net increased only by 0.1 pp to 5.4%. Operating margin improved to 12.1% from 11.4% despite an estimated 0.5 pp negative impact from the Japanese earthquake/tsunami.
Income before taxes improved by 34% or $61 million to $240 million, virtually in line with the $59 million improvement in operating income. Earnings in affiliates was an income of $1 million instead of a
loss in the same amount in the corresponding quarter 2010.
Net income attributable to controlling interest improved by 44% or $55 million to
$181million. The effective tax rate was 23.9% compared to 28.5% in the same quarter 2010. Discrete tax items reduced the effective tax rate by 3.2% in the quarter. Discrete items were not material in the first quarter 2010.
Earnings per share assuming dilution rose by 39% or $0.54 to $1.93. The positive discrete tax items had a favorable impact of 8 cents, while more shares
outstanding had a negative effect of 7 cents. The weighted average number of shares outstanding, assuming dilution, increased by 3% to 93.9 million from the same quarter 2010.
The return on capital employed improved to 33% from 25% and the return on equity to 24% from 21% during the first quarter 2010.
Cash Flow and Balance Sheet
Cash flow from operations amounted to $141 million. In the
same quarter 2010, operations generated $149 million in cash.
Cash flow before financing (non-U.S. GAAP measures, see enclosed table)
amounted to $63 million compared to $53 million during the same quarter 2010. Capital expenditures, net of $80 million were $15 million more than depreciation and amortization in the quarter and $44 million more than the unusually low capital
expenditures during the first quarter 2010.
During the quarter, operating working capital (non-U.S. GAAP measure) increased to 6.8% of sales
from an unusually low level of 5.4% at the end of previous quarter.
The Company has the policy that working capital in relation to last 12-month sales should not exceed 10%.
Account receivables increased by 19% and in relation to sales to 70 days outstanding from 66 at the end of the previous quarter, but
declined from 72 days on March 31, 2010. During the quarter, inventories increased by 8% while days inventory outstanding decreased to 29 days from 31 days due to higher sales.
Despite the positive cash flow, net debt (non-U.S. GAAP measure, see table) increased during the quarter by $2 million to $129 million at the end of the quarter. This was mainly due to negative currency
translation effects of $36 million and dividend payments of $36 million. Gross interest-bearing debt increased during the quarter by $22 million to $747 million due to currency translation effects.
Autolivs policy is to maintain a leverage ratio significantly below 3.0 times and an interest-coverage ratio significantly above 2.75 times. During
the quarter, the Companys leverage ratio stood unchanged at 0.1 times as on December 31, 2010, while the interest coverage ratio increased to 14.8 times from 14.1 times at the end of the previous quarter. Leverage ratio is measured as
adjusted net debt in relation to EBITDA (Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation and Amortization). Interest coverage is defined as operating income (excluding amortization of intangibles) in relation to interest expense, net. Adjusted net
debt includes pension liabilities but excludes the debt from equity units since these funds are regarded as equity by Standard & Poors due to the fact that the purchase contracts of the equity units are binding and not revocable. Net
debt to capitalization ratio stood unchanged at 4% on March 31, 2011 as at the end of December 2010.
During the quarter, total equity
increased by $174 million to $3,114 million mainly due to net income of $182 million, favorable currency effects of $23 million and common stock incentives of $7 million. This was partially offset by a $38 million accrual for the declared dividend
which will be paid in the second quarter. Total parent shareholders equity was $3,101 million corresponding to $34.76 per share.
Launches in the
1st Quarter
|
|
|
Chevrolets new Aveo: Side airbags, inflatable curtains and seatbelts with pretensioners. |
|
|
|
Chryslers new 300: Seatbelts with pretensioners and radar for blind-spot detection. |
|
|
|
Dodges new Charger: Steering wheel, driver airbag, seatbelts with pretensioners and radar for blind-spot detection.
|
|
|
|
Fiats new 500 US: Steering wheel, driver airbag, passenger airbag, knee airbag, side airbags, inflatable curtains and seatbelts with
pretensioners. |
|
|
|
Hyundais new Grandeur: Driver airbag, passenger airbag, knee airbag, side airbags, inflatable curtains and safety electronics.
|
|
|
|
Mitsubishis new i-MiEV: Side airbags and inflatable curtains. |
|
|
|
Peugeots new 508: Side airbags, inflatable curtains and seatbelts with pretensioners.
|
Q1 Report 2011
Headcount
Total headcount (permanent employees and temporary personnel) increased by 2,400 during the quarter to 45,700, primarily due to an increase of 1,700 in low-cost countries (LCC). In high-cost countries
(HCC), headcount increased by less than 700, of which nearly 600 were temporary personnel.
Currently, 63% of total headcount is in low-cost
countries, 71% are direct workers in manufacturing and 22% are temporary personnel. A year ago, these ratios were 60%, 69% and 22%, respectively.
Outlook
Based on Autolivs current call-offs from customers, we expect the
Companys second quarter organic sales to remain unchanged compared to the same quarter 2010. However, due to the difficulties in accurately assessing the stability in deliveries of components from Japan, our customers may unexpectedly change
their production plans during the quarter for one or several vehicle models. Inevitably, this makes our sales and margin guidance very uncertain. Currency effects are expected to add slightly more than 8% to sales, provided that current exchange
rates prevail while acquisitions, net are expected to add less than 1%. Based on these assumptions, consolidated sales are expected to increase by approximately 9% in the second quarter and operating margin is expected to reach approximately 9%.
For the full year 2011, IHS currently indicates in their most recent forecasts that global LVP could increase by 4% compared to 2010, despite
LVP in Japan dropping by 21%. This is based not only on the uncertain production situation in the second quarter, but also on IHSs assumption that almost all of the loss in global LVP in the second quarter could be recovered during the fall.
However, there will be significant differences among vehicle manufacturers in their recovery levels. Based on these assumptions, Autolivs organic sales would grow by approximately 8% and consolidated sales for the full year would increase by
about 15%, provided that current exchange rates prevail. Acquisitions are expected to add 2% to sales. Current assumptions also indicate that the Company would still reach an operating margin around 11.5% for the full year 2011 despite higher raw
material prices and the Japanese earthquake, but due to the high uncertainty in LVP plans the risk has increased since the beginning of the year when the indication was to reach an operating margin of at least 11.5%.
The projected effective tax rate for the remainder of the year, excluding any discrete tax items that might arise, is estimated to be around 28%.
Other Significant Events
|
|
|
The quarterly comparisons have been impacted by the former Delphi contracts in Asia that were re-sourced to Autoliv at the end of March 2010.
|
|
|
|
One of Autolivs four plants in Japan suffered minor damages from the earthquake but was brought back to operations before vehicle manufacturers
could resume their production. Autolivs own manufacturing is not hampered by component shortages, but some vehicle models to which Autoliv is a supplier can not currently be produced at volumes previously anticipated.
|
|
|
|
Autoliv has announced four additions to its manufacturing capacity in China. In Northern China, a
|
|
|
new facility is under construction in Changchun that will replace the existing plant in the city and double Autolivs airbag and seatbelt assembly capacity in Northern China. Also in
Nanjing, a completely new plant is under construction. This plant will increase Autolivs seatbelt capacity in the Shanghai area by 50%. In Southern China, the existing airbag and seatbelt plant in Guangzhou will be expanded by more than 50%.
In addition, as previously announced, Autoliv is extending its Chinese manufacturing facility for safety electronics by 50%. |
|
|
|
Autoliv secured a new revolving credit facility (RCF) that will replace the existing RCF which matures in November 2012. Both facilities amount to $1.1
billion. The new facility has a maturity of five years, with extension options of two more years. The refinancing offer was significantly oversubscribed. As for all of the Companys significant debt, the new RCF does not have any financial
covenants (i.e. performance-related restrictions). |
|
|
|
Autoliv has acquired technologies for camera-based forward-looking systems from Hella, the German manufacturer of lighting technologies and
electronics, and signed a cooperation agreement for further development of these technologies. They are used in Traffic Sign Recognition (TSR) systems to help the driver keep the correct speed, Lane Departure Warning (LDW) systems and for
automatically dipping head lights in Light Source Recognition systems. |
|
|
|
Autoliv has received Toyotas Excellence Award for outstanding performance during 2010. |
Annual General Meeting of Shareholders
The 2011 Annual Meeting of Shareholders will be held in Chicago on May 10. Holders of record at the close of business on March 14 are entitled
to be present and vote at the Meeting. A Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Material was mailed to shareholders in the end of March.
Dividend
As previously announced, the Company has decided to increase once again the
quarterly dividend to shareholders. This time the dividend was increased by 8%, which follows upon increases of 14% and 17% in the latest quarterly dividend announcements.
The new dividend will be 43 cents per share which will be paid on Thursday, June 2, 2011 to shareholders of record on May 5. The ex-date, when the shares will trade without the right to the
dividend, will be May 3, 2011.
As a result of this additional increase, the total dividend paid is expected to be $38 million, 23%
higher than the highest dividend amount paid before the crisis.
Next Report
Autoliv intends to publish the quarterly report for the second quarter 2011 on Thursday July 21.
Definitions and SEC Filings
Please refer to www.autoliv.com or to the Annual Report for
definitions of terms used in this report. Filings with the SEC of Autolivs annual report, 10-K report, quarterly reports in the form of 10-Q, proxy statements, management certifications, press releases in the form of 8-K and other documents
can also be obtained free of charge from Autoliv at the Companys address. These documents are also available at the SECs website www.sec.gov and at Autolivs corporate website www.autoliv.com
Q1 Report 2011
Safe Harbor Statement
This report contains statements that are not historical facts but rather forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (PSLRA). All such statements
are based upon our current expectations, various assumptions, and data available from third parties and apply only as of the date of this report. Our expectations and assumptions are expressed in good faith and we believe there is a reasonable basis
for them. However, there can be no assurance that forward-looking statements will materialize or prove to be correct as these assumptions are inherently subject to risks and uncertainties such as without limitation, changes in general industry and
market conditions, changes in and the successful execution of cost reduction initiatives and market reaction thereto, increased competition, changes in consumer preferences for end products, customer losses, bankruptcies, consolidations or
restructuring, divestiture of customer brands, fluctuation in vehicle production schedules for which the Company is a supplier, continued
uncertainty in program awards and performance, costs or difficulties related to the integration of any new or acquired businesses or technologies, pricing negotiations with customers, our ability
to be awarded new business, product liability, warranty and recall claims and other litigation and customer reaction thereto, possible adverse results of pending or future litigation or infringement claims, legislative or regulatory changes,
dependence on customers and suppliers, as well the risks identified in Item 1A Risk Factors in our Annual Report and Quarterly Report on Forms 10-K and 10-Q. Except for the Companys ongoing obligation to disclose information
under the U.S. federal securities laws, the Company undertakes no obligation to update publicly any forward-looking statements whether as a result of new information or future events. For any forward-looking statements contained in this or any other
document, we claim the protection of the safe harbor for forward-looking statements contained in the PSLR.
Q1 Report 2011
KEY RATIOS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter January-March |
|
|
Latest 12 Months |
|
|
Full Year |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
April 10 March 11 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Earnings per share, basic |
|
$ |
2.04 |
|
|
$ |
1.48 |
|
|
$ |
7.31 |
|
|
$ |
6.77 |
|
Earnings per share, diluted 1) |
|
$ |
1.93 |
|
|
$ |
1.39 |
|
|
$ |
6.94 |
|
|
$ |
6.39 |
|
Total parent shareholders equity per share |
|
|
34.76 |
|
|
|
29.24 |
|
|
|
34.76 |
|
|
|
32.89 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash dividend paid per share |
|
|
0.40 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.05 |
|
|
|
0.65 |
|
Operating working capital, $ in millions 2) |
|
|
513 |
|
|
|
426 |
|
|
|
513 |
|
|
|
388 |
|
Capital employed, $ in millions 3) |
|
|
3,243 |
|
|
|
3,153 |
|
|
|
3,243 |
|
|
|
3,066 |
|
Net debt, $ in millions 2) |
|
|
129 |
|
|
|
619 |
|
|
|
129 |
|
|
|
127 |
|
Net debt to capitalization, % 4) |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross margin, % 5) |
|
|
22.1 |
|
|
|
22.3 |
|
|
|
22.2 |
|
|
|
22.2 |
|
Operating margin, % 6) |
|
|
12.1 |
|
|
|
11.4 |
|
|
|
12.3 |
|
|
|
12.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Return on total equity, % 7) |
|
|
24.1 |
|
|
|
20.6 |
|
|
|
23.2 |
|
|
|
22.3 |
|
Return on capital employed, % 8) |
|
|
32.5 |
|
|
|
24.9 |
|
|
|
29.9 |
|
|
|
28.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average no. of shares in millions 1) |
|
|
93.9 |
|
|
|
90.8 |
|
|
|
93.0 |
|
|
|
92.4 |
|
No. of shares at period-end in millions 9) |
|
|
89.2 |
|
|
|
85.3 |
|
|
|
89.2 |
|
|
|
89.0 |
|
No. of employees at period-end |
|
|
35,531 |
|
|
|
31,010 |
|
|
|
35,531 |
|
|
|
34,590 |
|
Headcount at period-end10) |
|
|
45,729 |
|
|
|
39,699 |
|
|
|
45,729 |
|
|
|
43,325 |
|
Days receivables outstanding 11) |
|
|
70 |
|
|
|
72 |
|
|
|
77 |
|
|
|
69 |
|
Days inventory outstanding 12) |
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
32 |
|
1) |
Assuming dilution and net of treasury shares. |
2) |
Non-GAAP measure; for reconciliation see enclosed tables below. |
3) |
Total equity and net debt. |
4) |
Net debt in relation to capital employed. |
5) |
Gross profit relative to sales. |
6) |
Operating income relative to sales. |
7) |
Net income relative to average total equity. |
8) |
Operating income and equity in earnings of affiliates, relative to average capital employed. |
9) |
Excluding dilution and net of treasury shares. |
10) |
Includes temporary hourly personnel. |
11) |
Outstanding receivables relative to average daily sales. |
12) |
Outstanding inventory relative to average daily sales. |
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(Dollars in millions, except per share
data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter January - March |
|
|
Latest 12 Months |
|
|
Full Year |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
April 10 March 11 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Net sales |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- Airbag products |
|
$ |
1,385.4 |
|
|
$ |
1,126.8 |
|
|
$ |
4,981.1 |
|
|
$ |
4,722.5 |
|
- Seatbelt products |
|
|
686.3 |
|
|
|
574.8 |
|
|
|
2,474.9 |
|
|
|
2,363.4 |
|
- Active safety products |
|
|
36.9 |
|
|
|
19.2 |
|
|
|
102.4 |
|
|
|
84.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net sales |
|
|
2,108.6 |
|
|
|
1,720.8 |
|
|
|
7,558.4 |
|
|
|
7,170.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of sales |
|
|
(1,642.6 |
) |
|
|
(1,337.3 |
) |
|
|
(5,883.8 |
) |
|
|
(5,578.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
|
466.0 |
|
|
|
383.5 |
|
|
|
1,674.6 |
|
|
|
1,592.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general & administrative expenses |
|
|
(90.9 |
) |
|
|
(81.1 |
) |
|
|
(337.0 |
) |
|
|
(327.2 |
) |
Research, development & engineering expenses, net |
|
|
(114.5 |
) |
|
|
(91.6 |
) |
|
|
(384.2 |
) |
|
|
(361.3 |
) |
Amortization of intangibles |
|
|
(3.7 |
) |
|
|
(4.3 |
) |
|
|
(17.4 |
) |
|
|
(18.0 |
) |
Other income (expense), net |
|
|
(2.1 |
) |
|
|
(11.1 |
) |
|
|
(7.4 |
) |
|
|
(16.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
|
254.8 |
|
|
|
195.4 |
|
|
|
928.6 |
|
|
|
869.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity in earnings of affiliates, net of tax |
|
|
1.3 |
|
|
|
(1.2 |
) |
|
|
8.0 |
|
|
|
5.5 |
|
Interest income |
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
|
3.5 |
|
|
|
3.4 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
(15.4 |
) |
|
|
(14.5 |
) |
|
|
(55.2 |
) |
|
|
(54.3 |
) |
Loss on extinguishment of debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12.3 |
) |
|
|
(12.3 |
) |
Other financial items, net |
|
|
(1.8 |
) |
|
|
(1.3 |
) |
|
|
(6.5 |
) |
|
|
(6.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes |
|
|
239.8 |
|
|
|
179.2 |
|
|
|
866.1 |
|
|
|
805.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income taxes |
|
|
(57.3 |
) |
|
|
(51.0 |
) |
|
|
(216.3 |
) |
|
|
(210.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
182.5 |
|
|
$ |
128.2 |
|
|
$ |
649.8 |
|
|
$ |
595.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less; Net income attributable to non-controlling interests |
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
1.7 |
|
|
|
4.2 |
|
|
|
4.9 |
|
Net income attributable to controlling interests |
|
$ |
181.5 |
|
|
$ |
126.5 |
|
|
$ |
645.6 |
|
|
$ |
590.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share 1) |
|
$ |
1.93 |
|
|
$ |
1.39 |
|
|
$ |
6.94 |
|
|
$ |
6.39 |
|
1) |
Assuming dilution and net of treasury shares. |
Q1 Report 2011
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(Dollars in millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31 |
|
|
December 31 |
|
|
September 30 |
|
|
June 30 |
|
|
March 31 |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash & cash equivalents |
|
$ |
605.2 |
|
|
$ |
587.7 |
|
|
$ |
487.2 |
|
|
$ |
459.4 |
|
|
$ |
302.3 |
|
Receivables, net |
|
|
1,625.2 |
|
|
|
1,367.6 |
|
|
|
1,453.1 |
|
|
|
1,358.9 |
|
|
|
1,315.4 |
|
Inventories, net |
|
|
609.1 |
|
|
|
561.7 |
|
|
|
564.3 |
|
|
|
505.7 |
|
|
|
510.0 |
|
Other current assets |
|
|
185.1 |
|
|
|
171.6 |
|
|
|
166.9 |
|
|
|
131.5 |
|
|
|
161.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
3,024.6 |
|
|
|
2,688.6 |
|
|
|
2,671.5 |
|
|
|
2,455.5 |
|
|
|
2,289.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant & equipment, net |
|
|
1,075.6 |
|
|
|
1,025.8 |
|
|
|
1,016.8 |
|
|
|
962.1 |
|
|
|
1,012.2 |
|
Investments and other non-current assets |
|
|
231.6 |
|
|
|
228.1 |
|
|
|
226.2 |
|
|
|
227.6 |
|
|
|
228.9 |
|
Goodwill assets |
|
|
1,620.7 |
|
|
|
1,612.3 |
|
|
|
1,615.1 |
|
|
|
1,601.2 |
|
|
|
1,610.1 |
|
Intangible assets, net |
|
|
106.8 |
|
|
|
109.7 |
|
|
|
114.0 |
|
|
|
117.3 |
|
|
|
122.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
6,059.3 |
|
|
$ |
5,664.5 |
|
|
$ |
5,643.6 |
|
|
$ |
5,363.7 |
|
|
$ |
5,262.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term debt |
|
$ |
107.1 |
|
|
$ |
87.1 |
|
|
$ |
156.2 |
|
|
$ |
169.6 |
|
|
$ |
134.5 |
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
1,130.9 |
|
|
|
1,003.1 |
|
|
|
981.1 |
|
|
|
948.4 |
|
|
|
873.0 |
|
Other current liabilities |
|
|
809.8 |
|
|
|
744.3 |
|
|
|
774.1 |
|
|
|
675.7 |
|
|
|
691.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
2,047.8 |
|
|
|
1,834.5 |
|
|
|
1,911.4 |
|
|
|
1,793.7 |
|
|
|
1,698.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
639.9 |
|
|
|
637.7 |
|
|
|
680.0 |
|
|
|
708.8 |
|
|
|
792.5 |
|
Pension liability |
|
|
140.2 |
|
|
|
136.0 |
|
|
|
118.3 |
|
|
|
113.4 |
|
|
|
113.5 |
|
Other non-current liabilities |
|
|
117.8 |
|
|
|
117.1 |
|
|
|
126.8 |
|
|
|
126.3 |
|
|
|
124.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-current liabilities |
|
|
897.9 |
|
|
|
890.8 |
|
|
|
925.1 |
|
|
|
948.5 |
|
|
|
1,030.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total parent shareholders equity |
|
|
3,100.6 |
|
|
|
2,927.3 |
|
|
|
2,798.0 |
|
|
|
2,617.6 |
|
|
|
2,494.0 |
|
Non-controlling interest |
|
|
13.0 |
|
|
|
11.9 |
|
|
|
9.1 |
|
|
|
3.9 |
|
|
|
39.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total equity |
|
|
3,113.6 |
|
|
|
2,939.2 |
|
|
|
2,807.1 |
|
|
|
2,621.5 |
|
|
|
2,533.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and equity |
|
$ |
6,059.3 |
|
|
$ |
5,664.5 |
|
|
$ |
5,643.6 |
|
|
$ |
5,363.7 |
|
|
$ |
5,262.4 |
|
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Dollars in millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter January - March |
|
|
Latest 12 months |
|
|
Full Year |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
April 10 March 11 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Net income |
|
$ |
182.5 |
|
|
$ |
128.2 |
|
|
$ |
649.8 |
|
|
$ |
595.5 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
65.4 |
|
|
|
73.4 |
|
|
|
273.7 |
|
|
|
281.7 |
|
Other, net |
|
|
2.4 |
|
|
|
24.3 |
|
|
|
35.8 |
|
|
|
57.7 |
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities |
|
|
(108.9 |
) |
|
|
(77.0 |
) |
|
|
(42.4 |
) |
|
|
(10.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
141.4 |
|
|
|
148.9 |
|
|
|
916.9 |
|
|
|
924.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures, net |
|
|
(80.1 |
) |
|
|
(36.1 |
) |
|
|
(268.4 |
) |
|
|
(224.4 |
) |
Acquisitions of businesses and other, net |
|
|
1.9 |
|
|
|
(59.6 |
) |
|
|
(11.3 |
) |
|
|
(72.8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(78.2 |
) |
|
|
(95.7 |
) |
|
|
(279.7 |
) |
|
|
(297.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash before financing 1) |
|
|
63.2 |
|
|
|
53.2 |
|
|
|
637.2 |
|
|
|
627.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in short-term debt |
|
|
9.8 |
|
|
|
(182.0 |
) |
|
|
(86.8 |
) |
|
|
(278.6 |
) |
Issuance of long-term debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19.8 |
|
|
|
19.8 |
|
Repayments and other changes in long-term debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(29.2 |
) |
|
|
(141.6 |
) |
|
|
(170.8 |
) |
Dividends paid |
|
|
(35.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(93.3 |
) |
|
|
(57.7 |
) |
Cash paid for extinguishment of debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8.3 |
) |
|
|
(8.3 |
) |
Common stock options exercised |
|
|
7.1 |
|
|
|
3.5 |
|
|
|
32.8 |
|
|
|
29.2 |
|
Acquisition of subsidiary shares from non- controlling interests |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13.3 |
) |
|
|
(50.4 |
) |
|
|
(63.7 |
) |
Capital contribution from non-controlling interests |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
|
1.2 |
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash |
|
|
(27.0 |
) |
|
|
(2.6 |
) |
|
|
(7.7 |
) |
|
|
16.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
17.5 |
|
|
|
(170.4 |
) |
|
|
302.9 |
|
|
|
115.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at period-start |
|
|
587.7 |
|
|
|
472.7 |
|
|
|
302.3 |
|
|
|
472.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at period-end |
|
$ |
605.2 |
|
|
$ |
302.3 |
|
|
$ |
605.2 |
|
|
$ |
587.7 |
|
1) |
Non GAAP measure comprised of Net cash provided by operating activities and Net cash used in investing activities.
|
Q1 Report 2011
RECONCILIATION OF NON-U.S. GAAP MEASURES TO U.S. GAAP
(Dollars in millions, except per share data)
In this report we sometimes refer to non-U.S. GAAP measures that we and securities analysts use in measuring Autolivs performance. We believe that these measures assist investors and management in
analyzing trends in the Companys business for the reasons given below. Investors should not consider these non-U.S. GAAP measures as substitutes, but rather as additions to, financial reporting measures prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP.
It should be noted that these measures, as defined, may not be comparable to similarly titled measures used by other companies.
OPERATING WORKING CAPITAL
Due to the need to optimize cash generation to create value for shareholders, management focuses on operationally derived working capital as defined in
the table below. The reconciling items used to derive this measure are, by contrast, managed as part of our overall management of cash and debt, but they are not part of the responsibilities of day-to-day operations management.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31 2011 |
|
|
December 31 2010 |
|
|
September 30 2010 |
|
|
June 30 2010 |
|
|
March 31 2010 |
|
Total current assets |
|
$ |
3,024.6 |
|
|
$ |
2,688.6 |
|
|
$ |
2,671.5 |
|
|
$ |
2,455.5 |
|
|
$ |
2,289.0 |
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
(2,047.8 |
) |
|
|
(1,834.5 |
) |
|
|
(1,911.4 |
) |
|
|
(1,793.7 |
) |
|
|
(1,698.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Working capital |
|
|
976.8 |
|
|
|
854.1 |
|
|
|
760.1 |
|
|
|
661.8 |
|
|
|
590.5 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
(605.2 |
) |
|
|
(587.7 |
) |
|
|
(487.2 |
) |
|
|
(459.4 |
) |
|
|
(302.3 |
) |
Short-term debt |
|
|
107.1 |
|
|
|
87.1 |
|
|
|
156.2 |
|
|
|
169.6 |
|
|
|
134.5 |
|
Derivative asset and liability, current |
|
|
(4.1 |
) |
|
|
(0.7 |
) |
|
|
6.9 |
|
|
|
7.7 |
|
|
|
2.8 |
|
Dividends payable |
|
|
38.3 |
|
|
|
35.6 |
|
|
|
31.0 |
|
|
|
25.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating working capital |
|
$ |
512.9 |
|
|
$ |
388.4 |
|
|
$ |
467.0 |
|
|
$ |
405.3 |
|
|
$ |
425.5 |
|
NET DEBT
As part of efficiently managing the Companys overall cost of funds, we routinely enter into debt-related derivatives
(DRD) as part of our debt management. Creditors and credit rating agencies use net debt adjusted for DRD in their analyses of the Companys debt. By adjusting for DRD, the total economic liability of net debt is disclosed without grossing it up
with currency or interest fair market values that are offset by DRD reported in other balance sheet captions.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31 2011 |
|
|
December 31 2010 |
|
|
September 30 2010 |
|
|
June 30 2010 |
|
|
March 31 2010 |
|
Short-term debt |
|
$ |
107.1 |
|
|
$ |
87.1 |
|
|
$ |
156.2 |
|
|
$ |
169.6 |
|
|
$ |
134.5 |
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
639.9 |
|
|
|
637.7 |
|
|
|
680.0 |
|
|
|
708.8 |
|
|
|
792.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total debt |
|
|
747.0 |
|
|
|
724.8 |
|
|
|
836.2 |
|
|
|
878.4 |
|
|
|
927.0 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
(605.2 |
) |
|
|
(587.7 |
) |
|
|
(487.2 |
) |
|
|
(459.4 |
) |
|
|
(302.3 |
) |
Debt-related derivatives |
|
|
(12.4 |
) |
|
|
(10.0 |
) |
|
|
(11.2 |
) |
|
|
(2.2 |
) |
|
|
(5.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net debt |
|
$ |
129.4 |
|
|
$ |
127.1 |
|
|
$ |
337.8 |
|
|
$ |
416.8 |
|
|
$ |
619.3 |
|
COMPONENTS
IN SALES INCREASE/DECREASE
Since the Company generates almost 80% of sales in currencies other than in the reporting currency (i.e. U.S.
dollars) and currency rates have proven to be very volatile, and due to the fact that the Company has historically made several acquisitions and divestitures, we analyze the Companys sales trends and performance as changes in organic
sales growth. This presents the increase or decrease in the overall U.S. dollar net sales on a comparable basis, allowing separate discussions of the impact of acquisitions/divestitures and exchange rates. The tabular reconciliations below
presents changes in organic sales growth as reconciled to the change in total U.S. GAAP net sales.
Quarter
January - March
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Europe |
|
|
Americas |
|
|
Japan |
|
|
China |
|
|
RoA |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
% |
|
|
$ |
|
|
% |
|
|
$ |
|
|
% |
|
|
$ |
|
|
% |
|
|
$ |
|
|
% |
|
|
$ |
|
|
% |
|
|
$ |
|
Organic change |
|
|
11.1 |
|
|
$ |
81.3 |
|
|
|
27.0 |
|
|
$ |
140.9 |
|
|
|
(14.7 |
) |
|
$ |
(28.4 |
) |
|
|
22.6 |
|
|
$ |
39.6 |
|
|
|
10.3 |
|
|
$ |
9.8 |
|
|
|
14.1 |
|
|
$ |
243.2 |
|
Currency effects |
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
6.5 |
|
|
|
1.5 |
|
|
|
7.9 |
|
|
|
10.2 |
|
|
|
19.7 |
|
|
|
3.8 |
|
|
|
6.6 |
|
|
|
2.9 |
|
|
|
2.7 |
|
|
|
2.5 |
|
|
|
43.4 |
|
Acquisitions/divestitures |
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
3.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.8 |
|
|
|
8.4 |
|
|
|
94.0 |
|
|
|
89.6 |
|
|
|
5.9 |
|
|
|
101.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reported change |
|
|
12.4 |
|
|
$ |
91.0 |
|
|
|
28.5 |
|
|
$ |
148.8 |
|
|
|
(4.5 |
) |
|
$ |
(8.7 |
) |
|
|
31.2 |
|
|
$ |
54.6 |
|
|
|
107.2 |
|
|
$ |
102.1 |
|
|
|
22.5 |
|
|
$ |
387.8 |
|