Attached files
Table of Contents
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form 10-K
x | Annual Report under Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 |
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010
Commission File No. 000-25227
CAPITOL CITY BANCSHARES, INC.
(Name of Issuer as Specified in Its Charter)
Georgia | 58-1994305 | |
(State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization) |
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
562 Lee Street, S.W. Atlanta, Georgia |
30311 | |
(Address of Principal Executive Offices) | (Zip Code) |
(404) 752-6067
Issuers Telephone Number, Including Area Code
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: None.
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
COMMON STOCK, $1.00 PAR VALUE
(Title of Class)
Name of each exchange on which registered: None.
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes ¨ No x
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes ¨ No x
Check whether the issuer: (1) filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for past 90 days. Yes x No ¨
Table of Contents
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes ¨ No ¨
Check if there is no disclosure of delinquent filers in response to Item 405 of Regulation S-K in this form, and no disclosure will be contained, to the best of registrants knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. x
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of large accelerated filer, accelerated filer, and smaller reporting company, in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer | ¨ | Accelerated filer | ¨ | |||
Non-accelerated filer | ¨ (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) | Smaller reporting company | x |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes ¨ No x
State the aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by nonaffiliates computed by reference to the price at which the common equity was last sold, or the average bid and asked prices of such common equity, as of June 30, 2010: $17,752,570 (based on the stock price of $2.50 as of that date).
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuers classes of common equity, as of the latest practicable date: 9,810,456 shares of $1.00 par value common stock as of March 30, 2011.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Registrants definitive Proxy Statement, which is to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Regulation 14A not later than 120 days after the end of the fiscal year covered by this 10-K Annual Report, is incorporated by reference into Part III of this 10-K Annual Report.
Table of Contents
3
Table of Contents
Forward Looking Statement Disclosure
Statements in this Annual Report regarding future events or performance are forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (the PSLRA) and are made pursuant to the safe harbors of the PSLRA. Actual results of Capitol City Bancshares, Inc. (the Company) could be quite different from those expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements. Any statements containing the words could, may, will, should, plan, believes, anticipates, estimates, predicts, expects, projections, potential, continue, or words of similar import, constitute forward-looking statements, as do any other statements that expressly or implicitly predict future events, results, or performance. Factors that could cause results to differ from results expressed or implied by our forward-looking statements include, among others, risks discussed in the text of this Annual Report as well as the following specific items:
| General economic conditions, whether national or regional, that could affect the demand for loans or lead to increased loan losses; |
| Competitive factors, including increased competition with community, regional, and national financial institutions, that may lead to pricing pressures that reduce yields the Company achieves on loans and increase rates the Company pays on deposits, loss of the Companys most valued customers, defection of key employees or groups of employees, or other losses; |
| Increasing or decreasing interest rate environments, including the shape and level of the yield curve, that could lead to decreases in net interest margin, lower net interest and fee income, including lower gains on sales of loans, and changes in the value of the Companys investment securities; |
| Changing business or regulatory conditions or new legislation, affecting the financial services industry that could lead to increased costs, changes in the competitive balance among financial institutions, or revisions to our strategic focus; |
| Changes or failures in technology or third party vendor relationships in important revenue production or service areas, or increases in required investments in technology that could reduce our revenues, increase our costs or lead to disruptions in our business. |
| Our ability to meet the conditions outlined in the Consent Order including our ability to raise capital consistent with our capital plan. |
Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on our forward-looking statements, which reflect managements analysis only as of the date of the statements. The Company does not intend to publicly revise or update forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances that arise after the date of this report.
Readers should carefully review all disclosures we file from time to time with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the SEC).
4
Table of Contents
ITEM 1. | BUSINESS |
Business Overview
On April 14, 1998, Capitol City Bancshares, Inc. (the Company) was incorporated under the laws of the State of Georgia for the purpose of serving as a bank holding company for Capitol City Bank and Trust Company (the Bank).
The Companys common stock was initially authorized and issued in connection with the acquisition of 100% of the stock of the Bank, a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, on December 22, 1998.
In connection with that acquisition, the Company filed a Registration Statement under the Securities Act of 1933 as a successor issuer to the Bank, and filed a Form 8-A pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 for registration of the Companys common stock under the 1934 Act.
Capitol City Bank and Trust Company (the Bank) is a state banking institution chartered under the laws of the State of Georgia on June 30, 1994. Since opening on October 3, 1994, the Bank has continued a general banking business and presently serves its customers from eight locations: the main office located at 562 Lee Street, S.W., Atlanta, Georgia 30310; and service branches located at 2358 Cascade Road, Atlanta, Georgia 30311; Hartsfield-Jackson International Airport, Atlanta, Georgia; 5674 Memorial Drive, Stone Mountain, Georgia 30083; 301 W. Oglethorpe Boulevard, Albany, Georgia 31707; 339 Martin Luther King, Jr. Blvd., Savannah, Georgia 31401; 1268 Broad Street, Augusta, Georgia 30901; and 94 Peachtree Street, Atlanta, Georgia 30303.
The Bank operates a full-service banking business and engages in a broad range of commercial banking activities, including accepting customary types of demand and timed deposits, making individual, consumer, commercial, and installment loans, money transfers, safe deposit services, and making investments in U.S. government and municipal securities.
The data processing work of the Bank is processed with Fidelity National Information Services. The Bank offers its customers a variety of checking and savings accounts. The installment loan department makes both direct consumer loans and also purchases retail installment contracts from sellers of consumer goods.
The Bank serves the residents of the City of Atlanta and Fulton, DeKalb, Chatham, Richmond and Dougherty Counties. Each of these areas has a diverse commerce, including manufacturing, financial and service sector economies. Atlanta also serves as the capital of the State of Georgia, with a significant number of residents employed in government.
Neither the Company nor the Bank generates a material amount of revenue from foreign
5
Table of Contents
countries, nor does either have material long-lived assets, customer relationships, mortgages or servicing rights, deferred policy acquisition costs, or deferred tax assets in foreign countries. Thus, the Company has no significant risks attributable to foreign operations.
As of December 31, 2010, the Bank had correspondent relationships with SunTrust Bank of Atlanta, Georgia, Independent Bankers Bank and The Federal Home Loan Bank of Atlanta. The correspondent banks provide certain services to the Bank, buying and selling federal funds, handling money fund transfers and exchanges, shipping coins and currency, providing security and safekeeping of funds and other valuable items, handling loan participation and furnishing management investment advice on the Banks securities portfolio.
Bank Operations
Capitol City Bancshares, Inc.
Capitol City Bancshares, Inc. (the Company) owns 100% of the capital stock of the Bank. The Company also owns 100% of the capital stock of, and operates as its subsidiary, a mortgage company called Capitol City Home Loans, Inc. The principal role of the Company is to supervise and coordinate the activities of its subsidiaries.
Capitol City Bank and Trust Company
The Bank offers demand accounts, savings accounts, money market accounts, certificates of deposit and IRA accounts to customers. Loans are made to consumers and small businesses. Approximately 60% of the loan portfolio are loans to small businesses and include loans made through the Small Business Administration. Consumer loans include first and second mortgage loans, home equity loans, auto loans and signature loans.
Competition
The banking business in the City of Atlanta and Fulton, DeKalb, Chatham, Richmond and Dougherty Counties is highly competitive. The Bank competes with numerous other financial institutions in the market it represents. In addition to large national banks (and branches of regional banks), there are many finance companies, credit union offices, and other non-traditional providers of service that compete in the Banks markets.
Capitol City Home Loans, Inc.
The mortgage company has offices in the Stone Mountain area and in the Savannah branch of the Bank and provides mortgage loan origination services in the same primary market areas as the Bank. The mortgage company was incorporated in 2002 and has until recently originated mortgage loans and brokered those loans to independent investors. Capitol City Home Loans, Inc., has suspended its loan origination activities until such time as the mortgage market becomes more stable.
6
Table of Contents
Employees
As of December 31, 2010, the Company had 70 full-time employees and 16 part time employees. The Company is not a party to any collective bargaining agreements.
Supervision and Regulation
Bank holding companies and banks are regulated under both federal and state law. The following is a brief summary of certain statutes and rules and regulations affecting the Company, the Bank, and to a more limited extent the Companys subsidiaries.
This summary is qualified in its entirety by reference to the particular statute and regulatory provision referred to and is not intended to be an exhaustive description of the statutes or regulations applicable to the business of the Company and its subsidiaries. The scope of regulation and permissible activities of the Company and its subsidiaries is subject to change by future federal and state legislation. Supervision, regulation and examination of the Company and the Bank by the bank regulatory agencies are intended primarily for the protection of depositors rather than shareholders of the Company.
Regulation of the Company
The Company is a registered holding company under the Federal Bank Holding Company Act and the Georgia Bank Holding Company Act and is regulated under such Act by the Federal Reserve and by the Georgia Department of Banking and Finance (GDB&F), respectively.
Reporting and Examination
As a bank holding company, the Company is required to file annual reports with the Federal Reserve and the GDB&F and to provide such additional information as the applicable regulator may require pursuant to the Federal and Georgia Bank Holding Company Acts. The Federal Reserve and the GDB&F may also conduct examinations of the Company to determine whether the Company is in compliance with Bank Holding Company Acts and regulations promulgated thereunder.
Regulatory Order
On January 13, 2010, Capitol City Bank & Trust Company (the Bank), the wholly-owned subsidiary bank of Capitol City Bancshares, Inc., entered into a Stipulation to the Issuance of a Consent Order (the Stipulation) with the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (the FDIC) and the Georgia Department of Banking and Finance (the GDB&F), whereby the Bank consented to the issuance of a Consent Order (the Order). A copy of the Order was attached to the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on January 20, 2010.
The Order is based on findings of the FDIC during the on-site visitation and resulting report dated September 15, 2009. Since the completion of the visitation and report, the Board of Directors has aggressively taken an active role in working with the FDIC and the GDB&F to improve the
7
Table of Contents
condition of the Bank. In entering into the Order, the Bank did not concede to the findings or admit to any of the assertions therein.
Under the terms of the Order, the Bank cannot declare dividends without the prior written approval of the FDIC and the GDB&F. Other material provisions of the order require the Bank to: (i) increase its board of directors participation in the affairs and operations of the Bank, (ii) assess managements ability to comply with the Order and restore all aspects of the Bank to a safe and sound condition, (iii) establish a committee to oversee the Banks compliance with the Order, (iv) maintain specified minimum capital ratios of Tier I capital of 8% of total assets and Total risk-based capital of 10% of total risk-based assets, (v) improve the Banks lending and collection policies and procedures, (vi) eliminate from its books, by charge off or collection, all assets classified as loss and 50% of all assets classified as doubtful, (vii) perform risk segmentation analysis with respect to concentrations of credit, (viii) receive a brokered deposit waiver from the FDIC prior to accepting, rolling over or renewing any brokered deposits, (xi) establish and review a comprehensive policy for the adequacy of the Banks allowance for loan and lease losses, (x) formulate and fully implement a written plan and comprehensive budget for all categories of income and expense, and (xi) prepare and submit progress reports to the FDIC and the GDB&F. The FDIC order will remain in effect until modified or terminated by the FDIC and the GDB&F.
Acquisitions
The Federal Bank Holding Company Act requires every bank holding company to obtain the prior approval of the Federal Reserve before: (1) acquiring direct or indirect ownership or control of more than 5% of the voting shares of any bank; (2) acquiring all or substantially all of the assets of a bank; and (3) before merging or consolidating with another bank holding company.
The GDB&F requires similar approval prior to the acquisition of any additional banks from every Georgia bank holding company. A Georgia bank holding company is generally prohibited from acquiring ownership or control of 5% or more of the voting shares of a bank unless the bank being acquired is either a bank for purposes of the Federal Bank Holding Company Act, or a federal or state savings and loan association or savings bank or federal savings bank whose deposits are insured by the Federal Savings and Loan Insurance Corporation and such bank has been in existence and continuously operating as a bank for a period of five years or more prior to the date of application to the GDB&F for approval of such acquisition.
Source of Strength to Subsidiary Banks
The Federal Reserve (pursuant to regulation and published statements) has maintained that a bank holding company must serve as a source of financial strength to its subsidiary banks. In adhering to the Federal Reserve policy, the Company may be required to provide financial support to the Bank at a time when, absent such Federal Reserve policy, the Company may not deem it advisable to provide such assistance. Similarly, the Federal Reserve also monitors the financial performance and prospects of non-bank subsidiaries with an inspection process to ascertain whether such non-banking subsidiaries enhance or detract from the Companys ability to serve as a source of strength for the Bank.
8
Table of Contents
Capital Requirements
We are required to comply with the capital adequacy standards established by the federal banking agencies. There are two basic measures of capital adequacy for bank holding companies that have been promulgated by the Federal Reserve: a risk-based measure and a leverage measure. All applicable capital standards must be satisfied for a bank holding company to be considered in compliance.
The risk-based capital standards are designed to make regulatory capital requirements more sensitive to differences in risk profiles among banks and bank holding companies, to account for off-balance-sheet exposure, and to minimize disincentives for holding liquid assets. Assets and off-balance-sheet items are assigned to broad risk categories, each with appropriate weights. The resulting capital ratios represent capital as a percentage of total risk-weighted assets and off-balance-sheet items.
The minimum guideline for the ratio of Total Capital to risk-weighted assets (including certain off-balance-sheet items, such as standby letters of credit) is 8.0%. Total Capital consists of Tier 1 Capital, which is comprised of common stock, undivided profits, minority interests in the equity accounts of consolidated subsidiaries and non-cumulative perpetual preferred stock, less goodwill and certain other intangible assets, and Tier 2 Capital, which consists of subordinated debt, other preferred stock, and a limited amount of loan loss reserves. At December 31, 2010, our consolidated Total Capital Ratio and our Tier 1 Capital Ratio were 6.21% and 4.96%, respectively, resulting in our being classified as undercapitalized under the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action. For a more detailed analysis of the Company and the Banks regulatory requirements, please see Note 20 to the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
In addition, the Federal Reserve has established minimum leverage ratio guidelines for bank holding companies. These guidelines provide for a minimum ratio (the Leverage Ratio) of Tier 1 Capital to average assets, less goodwill and certain other intangible assets, of 3.0% for bank holding companies that meet certain specified criteria, including those having the highest regulatory rating. All other bank holding companies generally are required to maintain a Leverage Ratio of at least 3.0%, plus an additional cushion of 200 basis points. Our Leverage Ratio at December 31, 2010 was 4.17%, which is below the minimum 8% required in the Consent Order. The guidelines also provide that bank holding companies experiencing internal growth or making acquisitions will be expected to maintain strong capital positions substantially above the minimum supervisory levels without significant reliance on intangible assets. Furthermore, the Federal Reserve has indicated that it will consider a tangible Tier 1 Capital Leverage Ratio (deducting all intangibles) and other indicators of capital strength in evaluating proposals for expansion or new activities.
The Bank is subject to risk-based and leverage capital requirements adopted by its federal banking regulators, which are substantially similar to those adopted by the Federal Reserve for bank holding companies.
9
Table of Contents
Failure to meet capital guidelines could subject a bank or bank holding company to a variety of enforcement remedies, including issuance of a capital directive, the termination of deposit insurance by the FDIC, a prohibition on the taking of brokered deposits, and certain other restrictions on its business. As described below, substantial additional restrictions can be imposed upon FDIC-insured depository institutions that fail to meet applicable capital requirements. See Prompt Corrective Action.
The federal bank agencies continue to indicate their desire to raise capital requirements applicable to banking organizations beyond their current levels. In this regard, the Federal Reserve and the FDIC require regulators to consider interest rate risk (when the interest rate sensitivity of an institutions assets does not match the sensitivity of its liabilities or its off-balance-sheet position) in the evaluation of a banks capital adequacy. The regulatory agencies have proposed a methodology for evaluating interest rate risk that would require banks with excessive interest rate risk exposure to hold additional amounts of capital against such exposures.
Prompt Corrective Action
The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Improvement Act of 1991 (FDICIA) established a system of prompt corrective action to resolve the problems of undercapitalized institutions. Under this system, the federal banking regulators have established five capital categories (well capitalized, adequately capitalized, undercapitalized, significantly undercapitalized and critically undercapitalized), and are required to take certain mandatory supervisory actions, and are authorized to take other discretionary actions, with respect to institutions in the three undercapitalized categories. The severity of the action will depend upon the capital category in which the institution is placed. Generally, subject to a narrow exception, the banking regulator must appoint a receiver or conservator for an institution that is critically undercapitalized. The federal banking agencies have specified by regulation the relevant capital level for each category.
An institution that is categorized as undercapitalized, significantly undercapitalized, or critically undercapitalized is required to submit an acceptable capital restoration plan to its appropriate federal banking agency. A bank holding company must guarantee that a subsidiary depository institution meets its capital restoration plan, subject to certain limitations. The controlling holding companys obligation to fund a capital restoration plan is limited to the lesser of 5.0% of an undercapitalized subsidiarys assets or the amount required to meet regulatory capital requirements. An undercapitalized institution is also generally prohibited from increasing its average total assets, making acquisitions, establishing any branches or engaging in any new line of business, except under an accepted capital restoration plan or with FDIC approval. In addition, the appropriate federal banking agency may treat an undercapitalized institution in the same manner as it treats a significantly undercapitalized institution if it determines that those actions are necessary.
Payment of Dividends
The Company is a legal entity separate and distinct from the Bank. Most of the revenue of the Company results from dividends paid to it by the Bank. There are statutory and regulatory requirements applicable to the payment of dividends by the Bank, as well as by the Company to its
10
Table of Contents
shareholders.
Under the regulations of the GDB&F, dividends may not be declared out of the retained earnings of a state bank without first obtaining the written permission of the GDB&F, unless such bank meets all the following requirements:
(a) | total classified assets as of the most recent examination of the bank do not exceed 80% of equity capital (as defined by regulation); |
(b) | the aggregate amount of dividends declared or anticipated to be declared in the calendar year does not exceed 50% of the net profits after taxes but before dividends for the previous calendar year; and |
(c) | the ratio of equity capital to adjusted assets is not less than 6%. |
The payment of dividends by the Company and the Bank may also be affected or limited by other factors, such as the requirement to maintain adequate capital above regulatory guidelines. In addition, if, in the opinion of the applicable regulatory authority, a bank under its jurisdiction is engaged in or is about to engage in an unsafe or unsound practice (which, depending upon the financial condition of the bank, could include the payment of dividends), such authority may require, after notice and hearing, that such bank cease and desist from such practice. The FDIC has issued a policy statement providing that insured banks should generally only pay dividends out of current operating earnings. In addition to the formal statutes and regulations, regulatory authorities consider the adequacy of the Banks total capital in relation to its assets, deposits and other such items. In 2008, the Company declared cash dividends to common stockholders of $.08 per common share. We did not pay a dividend during 2009 or 2010 and we do not intend to pay a dividend in 2011 due to continued pressure on earnings and capital and as a result of the Consent Order.
The Riegle-Neal Interstate Banking and Branching Efficiency Act
The Riegle-Neal Interstate Banking and Branching Efficiency Act of 1994 (the Interstate Banking Act) regulates the interstate activities of banks and bank holding companies. Generally speaking, under the Interstate Banking Act, a bank holding company located in one state may lawfully acquire a bank located in any other state, subject to deposit-percentage, aging requirements and other restrictions. The Interstate Banking Act also generally provides that national and state-chartered banks may, subject to applicable state law, branch interstate through acquisitions of banks in other states. The Interstate Banking Act and related California laws have increased competition in the environment in which the Bank operates to the extent that out-of-state financial institutions directly or indirectly enter the Banks market areas. It appears that the Interstate Banking Act has contributed to the accelerated consolidation of the banking industry.
The Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act of 1999
Effective March 11, 2000, the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act, also known as the Financial Modernization Act, enabled full affiliations to occur among banks and securities firms, insurance companies, and other financial service providers, and enabled full affiliations to occur between such entities. This legislation permits bank holding companies that are well-capitalized and well-managed
11
Table of Contents
and meet other conditions can elect to become financial holding companies. As financial holding companies, they and their subsidiaries are permitted to acquire or engage in activities that were not previously allowed by bank holding companies such as insurance underwriting, securities underwriting and distribution, travel agency activities, broad insurance agency activities, merchant banking and other activities that the Federal Reserve determines to be financial in nature or complementary to these activities. Financial holding companies continue to be subject to the overall oversight and supervision of the Federal Reserve, but the Financial Modernization Act applies the concept of functional regulation to the activities conducted by subsidiaries. For example, insurance activities would be subject to supervision and regulation by state insurance authorities. The Company has no current intention of becoming a financial holding company, but may do so at some point in the future if deemed appropriate in view of opportunities or circumstances at the time.
The Financial Modernization Act also imposed new requirements on financial institutions with respect to consumer privacy. The statute generally prohibits disclosure of consumer information to non-affiliated third parties unless the consumer has been given the opportunity to object and has not objected to such disclosure. Financial institutions are further required to disclose their privacy policies to consumers annually. Financial institutions, however, will be required to comply with state law if it is more protective of consumer privacy than the Financial Modernization Act. The statute also directed federal regulators, including the Federal Reserve and the FDIC, to prescribe standards for the security of consumer information. The Company and the Bank are subject to such standards, as well as standards for notifying consumers in the event of a security breach.
Regulation of the Bank
As a state-chartered bank, the Bank is examined and regulated by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) and the GDB&F.
The major functions of the FDIC with respect to insured banks include paying depositors to the extent provided by law in the event an insured bank is closed without adequately providing for payment of the claim of depositors, acting as a receiver of state banks placed in receivership when so appointed by state authorities, and preventing the continuance or development of unsound and unsafe banking practices. In addition, the FDIC also approves conversions, mergers, consolidations, and assumption of deposit liability transactions between insured banks and noninsured banks or institutions to prevent capital or surplus diminution in such transactions where the resulting, continued or assumed bank is an insured nonmember state bank.
Subsidiary banks of a bank holding company are subject to certain restrictions imposed by the Federal Bank Holding Company Act on any extension of credit to the bank holding company or any of its subsidiaries, on investment in the stock or other securities thereof and on the taking of such stock or securities as collateral for loans to any borrower. In addition, a bank holding company and its subsidiaries are prohibited from engaging in certain tie-in arrangements in connection with any extension of credit or provision of any property or services.
The GDB&F regulates all areas of the banks banking operations, including mergers,
12
Table of Contents
establishment of branches, loans, interest rates, and reserves. The Bank must have the approval of the Commissioner to pay cash dividends, unless at the time of such payment:
a. the total classified assets at the most recent examination of such bank do not exceed 80% of Tier 1 capital plus Allowance for Loan Losses as reflected at such examination;
b. the aggregate amount of dividends declared or anticipated to be declared in the calendar year does not exceed 50% of the net profits, after taxes but before dividends, for the pervious calendar year; and
c. the ratio of Tier 1 Capital to Adjusted Total Assets shall not be less than six (6) percent.
The Bank is also subject to State of Georgia banking and usury laws restricting the amount of interest which it may charge in making loans or other extensions of credit.
Expansion through Branching, Merger or Consolidation
With respect to expansion, the Bank was previously prohibited from establishing branch offices or facilities outside of the county in which its main office was located, except:
(i) | in adjacent counties in certain situations, or |
(ii) | by means of merger or consolidation with a bank which has been in existence for at least five years. |
In addition, in the case of a merger or consolidation, the acquiring bank must have been in existence for at least 24 months prior to the merger. However, effective July 1, 1996, Georgia permits the subsidiary bank(s) of any bank holding company then engaged in the banking business in the State of Georgia to establish, de novo, upon receipt of required regulatory approval, an aggregate of up to three additional branch banks in any county within the State of Georgia. Effective July 1, 1998, this same Georgia law permits, with required regulatory approval, the establishment of de novo branches in an unlimited number of counties within the State of Georgia by the subsidiary bank(s) of bank holding companies then engaged in the banking business in the State of Georgia. This law may result in increased competition in the Banks market area.
Capital Requirements
The FDIC adopted risk-based capital guidelines that went into effect on December 31, 1990 for all FDIC insured state chartered banks that are not members of the Federal Reserve System. Beginning December 31, 1992, all banks were required to maintain a minimum ratio of total capital to risk weighted assets of eight (8) percent of which at least four (4) percent must consist of Tier 1 capital. Tier 1 capital of state chartered banks (as defined by the regulation) generally consists of: (i) common stockholders equity; (ii) qualifying noncumulative perpetual preferred stock and related surplus; and (iii) minority interests in the equity accounts of consolidated subsidiaries. In addition,
13
Table of Contents
the FDIC adopted a minimum ratio of Tier 1 capital to total assets of banks, referred to as the leverage capital ratio of three (3) percent if the FDIC determines that the institution is not anticipating or experiencing significant growth and has well-diversified risk, including no undue interest rate exposure, excellent asset quality, high liquidity, good earnings and, in general is considered a strong banking organization, rated Composite 1 under the Uniform Financial Institutions Rating System (the CAMEL rating system) established by the Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council. All other financial institutions are required to maintain leverage ratio of four (4) percent.
Effective October 1, 1998, the FDIC amended its risk-based and leverage capital rules as follows: (1) all servicing assets and purchase credit card relationships (PCCRs) that are included in capital are each subject to a ninety (90) percent of fair value limitation (also known as a ten (10) percent haircut); (2) the aggregate amount of all servicing assets and PCCRs included in capital cannot excess 100% of Tier I capital; (3) the aggregate amount of nonmortgage servicing assets (NMSAs) and PCCRS included in capital cannot exceed 25% of Tier 1 capital; and (4) all other intangible assets (other than qualifying PCCRS) must be deducted from Tier 1 capital.
Amounts of servicing assets and PCCRs in excess of the amounts allowable must be deducted in determining Tier 1 capital. Interest-only Strips receivable, whether or not in security form, are not subject to any regulatory capital limitation under the amended rule.
U.S. Treasurys Troubled Asset Relief Program Capital Purchase Program
On October 3, 2008, the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008 (EESA) was enacted that provides the U.S. Secretary of the Treasury with broad authority to implement certain actions to help restore stability and liquidity to U.S. markets. One of the provisions resulting from the legislation is the Troubled Asset Relief Program Capital Purchase Program (CPP), which provides direct equity investment in perpetual preferred stock by the U.S. Treasury Department in qualified financial institutions. The program is voluntary and requires an institution to comply with a number of restrictions and provisions, including limits on executive compensation, stock redemptions and declaration of dividends. The CPP provides for a minimum investment of one percent of total risk-weighted assets and a maximum investment equal to the lesser of three percent of total risk-weighted assets or $25 billion. Participation in the program is not automatic and is subject to approval by the U.S. Treasury Department. The Company did not participate in the CPP.
Temporary Liquidity Guarantee Program
On October 14, 2008, the FDIC announced a new program the Temporary Liquidity Guarantee Program. This program has two components The Debt Guarantee Program and the Transaction Account Guarantee Program. The Debt Guarantee Program guarantees newly issued senior unsecured debt of a participating organization, up to certain limits established for each institution, issued between October 14, 2008 and June 30, 2009. The FDIC will pay the unpaid principal and interest on an FDIC-guaranteed debt instrument upon the uncured failure of the participating entity to make a timely payment of principal or interest in accordance with the terms of the instrument. The guarantee will remain in effect until June 30, 2012. In return for the FDICs guarantee, participating institutions will pay the FDIC a fee based on the amount and maturity of the debt. The Bank and the Company have opted not to participate in the Debt Guarantee Program.
14
Table of Contents
The Transaction Account Guarantee Program provides full federal deposit insurance coverage for non-interest bearing transaction deposit accounts, regardless of dollar amount, until December 31, 2009. An annualized 10 basis point assessment on balances in noninterest-bearing transaction accounts that exceed the existing deposit insurance limit of $250,000 will be assessed on a quarterly basis to insured depository institutions that have not opted out of this component of the Temporary Liquidity Guarantee Program. The Bank has opted to participate in the Transaction Account Guarantee Program.
The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010
The Dodd-Frank Act was enacted on July 21, 2010 and created a new Consumer Financial Protection Bureau with power to promulgate and enforce consumer protection laws. Smaller depository institutions, those with $10 billion or less in assets, will be subject to the Consumer Financial Protection Bureaus rulewriting authority, and existing depository institution regulatory agencies will retain examination and enforcement authority for such institutions. The Dodd-Frank Act also establishes a Financial Stability Oversight Council chaired by the Secretary of the Treasury with authority to identify institutions and practices that might pose a systemic risk and, among other things, includes provisions affecting (1) corporate governance and executive compensation of all companies whose securities are registered with the SEC, (2) FDIC insurance assessments, (3) interchange fees for debit cards, which would be set by the Federal Reserve under a restrictive reasonable and proportional cost per transaction standard, (4) minimum capital levels for bank holding companies, subject to a grandfather clause for financial institutions with less than $15 billion in assets, (5) derivative and proprietary trading by financial institutions, and (6) the resolution of large financial institutions.
FDIC Insurance Assessments
The FDIC establishes rates for the payment of premiums by federally insured banks and thrifts for deposit insurance. Member institutions pay deposit insurance assessments to the Deposit Insurance Fund (the DIF). The FDIC recently amended its risk-based assessment system to implement authority that the FDIC was granted under the Federal Deposit Insurance Reform Act of 2005 (the Reform Act). Under the revised system, insured institutions are assigned to one of four risk categories based on a supervisory evaluations, regulatory capital levels and other factors. The new regulation allows the FDIC to more closely tie each financial institutions deposit insurance premiums to the risk it poses to the DIF. The assessment rate of an institution depends upon the category to which it is assigned. Risk Category I contains the least risky depository institutions and Risk Category IV contains the most risky depository institutions. The Risk Category is based on whether the institution is Well Capitalized, Adequately Capitalized, or Undercapitalized in regard to the institutions capital ratios. The CAMELS rating of the institution is also used in the determination of the Risk Category. Risk Category I, unlike the other risk categories, contains further risk differentiation based on the FDICs analysis of financial ratios, examination components and other information. In the first quarter of 2009, the FDIC increased the amount to be assessed from financial institutions by increasing its risk-based deposit insurance assessment scale uniformly due to the increased and anticipated number of bank failures, Thus, the assessment scale ranges from twelve basis points of assessable deposits for the strongest institutions (Risk Category I) to forty-five basis
15
Table of Contents
points for the weakest (Risk Category IV). In 2008 the FDIC increased the amount of deposits it insures from $100,000 to $250,000.
In addition to the assessment for deposit insurance, institutions are requires to make payments on bonds which were issued in the late 1980s by the Financing Corporation in order to recapitalize the predecessor to the Savings Association Insurance Fund. During 2008, Financing Corporation payments for Savings Association Insurance Fund members approximated 1.12 basis points of assessable deposits. These assessments, which are adjusted quarterly, will continue until the Financing Corporation bonds mature in 2017.
The FDIC may terminate its insurance of deposits if it finds that the institution has engaged in unsafe and unsound practices, is in an unsafe or unsound condition to continue operations or has violated any applicable law, regulation, rule, order or condition imposed by the FDIC.
On November 9, 2010, the FDIC issued a Final Rule implementing section 343 of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act that made permanent the increase in FDIC insurance for deposit accounts to $250,000, and provides for unlimited insurance coverage of noninterest-bearing transaction accounts. Beginning December 31, 2010 through December 31, 2012, all noninterest-bearing transaction accounts and Interest on Lawyer Trust Accounts (IOLTA) are fully insured, regardless of the balance of the account, at all FDIC-insured institutions. The unlimited insurance coverage is available to all depositors, including consumers, businesses, and government entities. This unlimited insurance coverage is separate from, and in addition to, the insurance coverage provided to a depositors other deposit accounts held at an FDIC-insured institution. Money Market Deposit Accounts (MMDAs) and Negotiable Order of Withdrawal (NOW) accounts are not eligible for this unlimited insurance coverage, regardless of the interest rate, even if no interest is paid on the account.
Community Reinvestment Act
The Company and the Bank are subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act of 1977, as amended (the CRA) and the federal banking agencies regulations issued thereunder. Under the CRA, all banks and thrifts have a continuing and affirmative obligation, consistent with its safe and sound operation to help meet the credit needs for their entire communities, including low- and moderate-income neighborhoods. The CRA does not establish specific lending requirements or programs for financial institutions, nor does it limit an institutions discretion to develop the types of products and services that it believes are best suited to its particular community, consistent with the CRA.
The CRA requires a depository institutions primary federal regulator, in connection with its examination of the institution, to assess the institutions record of assessing and meeting the credit needs of the community served by that institution, including low- and moderate-income neighborhoods. The regulatory agencys assessment of the institutions record is made available to the public. In the case of a bank holding company applying for approval to acquire a bank or other bank holding company, the Federal Reserve will assess the records of each subsidiary depository institution of the applicant bank holding company, and such records may be the basis for denying the
16
Table of Contents
application.
The evaluation system used to judge an institutions CRA performance consists of three tests: (1) a lending test; (2) an investment test; and (3) a service test. Each of these tests will be applied by the institutions primary federal regulator taking into account such factors as: (i) demographic data about the community; (ii) the institutions capacity and constraints; (iii) the institutions product offerings and business strategy; and (iv) data on the prior performance of the institution and similarly-situated lenders.
In addition, a financial institution will have the option of having its CRA performance evaluated based on a strategic plan of up to five years in length that it had developed in cooperation with local community groups. In order to be rated under a strategic plan, the institution will be required to obtain the prior approval of its federal regulator.
The interagency CRA regulations provide that an institution evaluated under a given test will receive one of five ratings for the test: (1) outstanding; (2) high satisfactory; (3) low satisfactory; (4) needs to improve; and (5) substantial noncompliance. An institution will receive a certain number of points for its rating on each test, and the points are combined to produce an overall composite rating. Evidence of discriminatory or other illegal credit practices would adversely affect an institutions overall rating. As a result of the Banks most recent CRA examination, the Bank received a satisfactory CRA rating.
Commercial Real Estate Lending and Concentrations
On December 12, 2006, the federal bank regulatory agencies published final guidance on Concentration in Commercial Real Estate Lending, Sound Risk Management Practices (the Guidance). This Guidance is intended to remind financial institutions that strong risk management practices and appropriate levels of capital are important elements of a sound commercial real estate (CRE) lending program. The Guidance does not establish specific CRE lending limits. CRE loans include those loans with risk profiles sensitive to the condition of the general CRE market. CRE loans are: land development and construction loans (including 1- to 4-family residential and commercial construction loans), other land loans, loans secured by multifamily property, and nonfarm nonresidential property where the primary source of repayment is derived from rental income associated with the property (that is, loans for which 50% or more of the source of repayment comes from third party, nonaffiliated, rental income) or the proceeds of the sale, refinancing, or permanent financing of the property.
Although the Guidance does not define a CRE concentration, it does describe the criteria that the regulatory agencies will use as high-level indicators to identify institutions potentially exposed to CRE concentration risk. Financial institutions may be identified for further supervisory analysis of the level and nature of its CRE concentration risk if it has experienced rapid growth in CRE lending, has notable exposure to a specific type of CRE, or is approaching or exceeds the following supervisory criteria:
| Total reported loans for construction, land development, and other land represent 100% or more of the institutions total capital; or |
17
Table of Contents
| Total CRE loans represent 300% or more of the institutions total capital, and the outstanding balance of the institutions CRE loan portfolio has increased by 50% or more during the previous 36 months. |
Where these criteria are identified, a financial institution will need to implement enhanced strategic planning, CRE underwriting policies, risk management and internal controls, portfolio stress testing, risk exposure limits, and other policies, including management compensation and incentives, to address the CRE risks. Higher allowances for loan losses and capital levels may also be appropriate.
For a summary of the Companys loan concentrations, see Note 5 and Note 19 to the consolidated financial statements attached hereto.
Monetary Policy
The results of operations of the Company and the Bank are affected by credit policies of monetary authorities, particularly the Federal Reserve. The instruments of monetary policy employed by the Federal Reserve include open market operations in U.S. Government securities, changes in the discount rate on member bank borrowings, changes in reserve requirements against member bank deposits and limitations on interest rates which member banks may pay on time and savings deposits. In view of the changing conditions in the foreign and national economy, as well as the effect of policies and actions taken by monetary and fiscal authorities, including the Federal Reserve, no prediction can be made as to possible future changes in interest rates, deposit levels, loan demand or the business and earnings of the Company.
Anti-Terrorism Legislation
In the wake of the tragic events of September 11th, on October 26, 2001, the President signed the Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism (the USA PATRIOT Act) Act of 2001. Under the USA PATRIOT Act, financial institutions are subject to prohibitions against specified financial transactions and account relationships as well as enhanced due diligence and know your customer standards in their dealings with foreign financial institutions and foreign customers. For example, the enhanced due diligence policies, procedures, and controls generally require financial institutions to take reasonable steps:
| to conduct enhanced scrutiny of account relationships to guard against money laundering and report any suspicious transaction; |
| to ascertain the identity of the nominal and beneficial owners of, and the source of funds deposited into, each account as needed to guard against money laundering and report any suspicious transactions; |
18
Table of Contents
| to ascertain for any foreign bank, the shares of which are not publicly traded, the identity of the owners of the foreign bank, and the nature and extent of the ownership interest of each such owner; and |
| to ascertain whether any foreign bank provides correspondent accounts to other foreign banks and, if so, the identity of those foreign banks and related due diligence information. |
The USA PATRIOT Act requires financial institutions to establish anti-money laundering programs. The USA PATRIOT Act sets forth minimum standards for these programs, including:
| the development of internal policies, procedures, and controls; |
| the designation of a compliance officer; |
| an ongoing employee training program; and |
| an independent audit function to test the programs. |
In addition, the USA PATRIOT Act authorizes the Secretary of the Treasury to adopt rules increasing the cooperation and information sharing between financial institutions, regulators, and law enforcement authorities regarding individuals, entities and organizations engaged in, or reasonably suspected based on credible evidence of engaging in, terrorist acts or money laundering activities. Any financial institution complying with these rules will not be deemed to have violated the privacy provisions of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act, as discussed above.
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Sarbanes-Oxley) was enacted to increase corporate responsibility, provide for enhanced penalties for accounting and auditing improprieties at publicly traded companies, and protect investors by improving the accuracy and reliability of disclosures pursuant to the securities laws. Sarbanes-Oxley includes important new requirements for public companies in the areas of financial disclosure, corporate governance, and the independence, composition and responsibilities of audit committees. Among other things, Sarbanes-Oxley mandates chief executive and chief financial officer certifications of periodic financial reports, additional financial disclosures concerning off-balance sheet items, and speedier transaction reporting requirements for executive officers, directors and 10% shareholders. In addition, penalties for non-compliance with the Exchange Act were heightened. SEC rules promulgated pursuant to Sarbanes-Oxley impose obligations and restrictions on auditors and audit committees intended to enhance their independence from management, and include extensive additional disclosure, corporate governance and other related rules. Sarbanes-Oxley represents significant federal involvement in matters traditionally left to state regulatory systems, such as the regulation of the accounting profession, and to state corporate law, such as the relationship between a Board of Directors and Management and between a Board of Directors and its committees.
19
Table of Contents
We have not experienced any significant difficulties in complying with Sarbanes-Oxley. However, we have incurred, and expect to continue to incur, significant costs in connection with compliance with Section 404 of Sarbanes-Oxley, which requires Management to undertake an assessment of the adequacy and effectiveness of our internal controls over financial reporting and which will require in 2009 our auditors to attest to, and report on, Managements assessment and the operating effectiveness of these controls.
Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses
On December 13, 2006, the federal bank regulatory agencies released Interagency Policy Statement on the Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses (ALLL), which revises and replaces the banking agencies 1993 policy statement on the ALLL. The revised statement was issued to ensure consistency with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) and more recent supervisory guidance. The revised statement extends the applicability of the policy to credit unions. Additionally, the agencies issued 16 FAQs to assist institutions in complying with both GAAP and ALLL supervisory guidance.
Highlights of the revised statement include the following:
| The revised statement emphasizes that the ALLL represents one of the most significant estimates in an institutions financial statements and regulatory reports and that an assessment of the appropriateness of the ALLL is critical to an institutions safety and soundness. |
| Each institution has a responsibility to develop, maintain, and document a comprehensive, systematic, and consistently applied process for determining the amounts of the ALLL. An institution must maintain an ALLL that is sufficient to cover estimated credit losses on individual impaired loans as well as estimated credit losses inherent in the remainder of the portfolio. |
| The revised statement updates the previous guidance on the following issues regarding ALLL: (1) responsibilities of the board of directors, management, and bank examiners; (2) factors to be considered in the estimation of ALLL; and (3) objectives and elements of an effective loan review system. |
Competition
The banking industry is highly competitive. Banks generally compete with other financial institutions through the banking products and services offered, the pricing of services, the level of service provided, the convenience and availability of services, and the degree of expertise and the personal manner in which services are offered. The Bank encounters competition from most of the financial institutions in the Banks primary service area. In the conduct of certain areas of its banking business, the Bank also competes with credit unions, consumer finance companies, insurance companies, money market mutual funds and other financial institutions, some of which are not subject to the same degree of regulation and restrictions imposed upon the Bank.
20
Table of Contents
Management believes that competitive pricing and personalized service will provide it with a method to compete effectively in the primary service area.
Proposed Legislation
Legislation is regularly considered and adopted by both the United States Congress and the Georgia General Assembly. Such legislation could result in regulatory changes and changes in competitive relationships for banks and bank holding companies. The effect of such legislation on the business of the Company and the Bank cannot be predicted.
ITEM 2. | PROPERTIES |
The Companys main offices are located at 562 Lee Street, S.W., Atlanta, Georgia 30310. The main office, which is owned by the Bank, consists of approximately 7,000 square feet, four drive-in windows and adjacent parking lot.
Banking operations are also conducted from a branch located at 2358 Cascade Road, Atlanta, Georgia 30311. This branch is owned by the Bank and has been in continuous operation since it opened in October 3, 1994. The branch is a single story building with approximately 3,000 square feet, one drive-in window and an adjacent parking lot.
The Bank maintains a branch at Hartsfield-Jackson International Airport. The Hartsfield branch has two teller windows and a customer service desk. The branch is approximately 475 square feet, and is open seven days a week. The Bank leases the space for the Hartsfield branch from the airport. With regard to the Hartsfield lease, see also Note 6 to Financial Statements, located in Item 8 of this Form 10-K, below.
The Bank maintains a branch it owns at 5674 Memorial Drive, Stone Mountain, Georgia 30083. The building is a two-story building with 4,706 square feet with a drive-in window.
On July 16, 2002, the Bank opened a branch at 301 W. Oglethorpe Boulevard, Albany, Georgia 31707. It is a two-story building with 6,174 square feet and a drive-thru window.
In January, 2003, the Bank purchased two parcels of land in downtown Savannah, Georgia, one with a 5,724 square foot building, the other across the street, and 1,820 square foot parking garage. The address for the office is 339 Martin Luther King, Jr. Boulevard, Savannah, Georgia 31401. The office opened in January, 2004 as a full-service banking location.
In July, 2004, the Bank purchased property in downtown Augusta, Georgia for a future branch site. The site contains a 5,000 square foot building previously operated as a Wachovia branch. The address is 1268 Broad Street, Augusta, Georgia 30901. The office opened in January, 2005 as a full-service banking location.
In May 2006, the Company purchased property located at 94 Peachtree Street, Atlanta,
21
Table of Contents
Georgia for the purpose of opening an eighth branch office. The branch opened in August 2008.
ITEM 3. | LEGAL PROCEEDINGS |
The Companys nature of business is such that it ordinarily results in a certain amount of litigation. In the opinion of management for the Company, there is no litigation in which the outcome will have a material effect on the consolidated financial statements.
ITEM 4. | (RESERVED) |
ITEM 5. | MARKET FOR REGISTRANTS COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES |
Stock Prices and Dividends
The common stock of the Company is not traded in the over-the-counter market or on any stock exchange, nor is the Companys common stock actively traded. There is thus no established trading market for the Companys common stock. The Company has maintained records of share prices based on actual transactions when such information has been disclosed by persons either purchasing or selling the Companys common stock. These records reflect prices for transactions in the Companys common stock to the best knowledge of management.
The following table reflects the high and low trades of shares of the Company for each quarterly period during the last two years based on such limited available information.
YEAR |
HIGH SELLING PRICE* |
LOW SELLING PRICE* |
||||||
2009 |
||||||||
First Quarter |
$ | 10.00 | $ | 10.00 | ||||
Second Quarter |
$ | 10.00 | $ | 10.00 | ||||
Third Quarter |
$ | 10.00 | $ | 10.00 | ||||
Fourth Quarter |
$ | 10.00 | $ | 10.00 |
22
Table of Contents
YEAR |
HIGH SELLING PRICE* |
LOW SELLING PRICE* |
||||||
2010 |
||||||||
First Quarter |
$ | 10.0 | $ | 10.00 | ||||
Second Quarter |
$ | 10.00 | $ | 10.00 | ||||
Third Quarter |
$ | 2.50 | $ | 2.50 | ||||
Fourth Quarter |
$ | 2.50 | $ | 2.50 |
*Prices are adjusted to reflect the 4-for-1 stock split effective June 22, 2010.
As of December 31, 2010, the Company had approximately 1646 shareholders of record of the Companys common stock.
Under the Financial Institutions Code of Georgia, the Bank may from time to time declare and thereupon pay dividends on its outstanding shares in cash, property or its own shares unless, after giving effect to such distribution, the Bank would not be able to pay its debts as they become due in the usual course of business or the Bank would have insufficient cash market value assets to pay liabilities to depositors and other creditors. Moreover, the Bank may declare and pay dividends in cash or property only out of the retained earnings of the Bank, the Bank may not declare and pay dividends at any time the Bank does not have paid-in capital and appropriated retained earnings equal or exceeding 20% of its capital stock, the Bank may not declare and pay dividends in excess of 50% of net profits after taxes for the previous fiscal year without the prior approval of the GDB&F. The Bank is also allowed to declare and pay dividends in authorized but unissued shares of its stock, provided there is transferred to capital stock an amount equal to the value of the shares distributed and provided further that after payment of the dividend the Bank continues to maintain required levels of paid-in capital and appropriated retained earnings. The Company paid dividends in 2008 of $.08 per share and no dividends in 2009 or 2010.
On February 8, 2005, the Company approved a 4-for-1 stock split of its common shares. The split entitled each shareholder of record at the close of business on March 1, 2005, to receive four shares for every one share of stock of the Company owned by the shareholder. The stock split was implemented and the stock was distributed in the form of a stock dividend.
On July 13, 2010, the Company approved 4-for-1 stock split of its common shares. The split entitled each shareholder of record at the close of business on June 22, 2010 to receive four shares for every one share of stock of the Company owed by the shareholder. The stock split was implemented and the stock was distributed in the form of a stock dividend. The par value was changed from $1.50 to $1.00 per share.
The Company offered up to 1,500,000 shares of its common stock in a registered public offering. The final Prospectus was filed with the SEC on May 8, 2008 and contained the specifics of the offering. The Company has sold 1,009,812 shares and received $4,176,204 into its capital
23
Table of Contents
account. The offering is ongoing and will end on May 7, 2011. The Company did not purchase any of its common stock during 2010.
On July 13, 2010, the Company filed Articles of Amendment to the Articles of Incorporation to increase the number of preferred shares the Company is authorized to issue to 5,000,000 shares of preferred stock of the Company. The amendment was approved by a majority vote of the shareholders at the Companys 2010 Annual Meeting of Shareholders. The articles previously limited to the amount of authorized preferred stock to $5,000,000. The Company has currently issued 10,000 shares of Series A preferred stock and 6,078 shares of Series B preferred stock, for a total of $1,607,800 outstanding. The amendment eliminated the maximum dollar amount limitation and now provides for a maximum number of shares that are available to be issued, which is 5,000,000 shares.
The actual effect of the issuance of any additional shares of the preferred stock upon the rights of holders of common stock cannot be stated until the Board of directors determines the specific rights of any shares of the preferred stock. However, the effects might include, among other things, restricting dividends on the common stock, diluting the voting power of the common stock, reducing the market price of the common stock or impairing the liquidation rights of the common stock without further action by the shareholders. Holders of Capitol Citys common stock do not have preemptive rights with respect to the preferred stock.
The amendment also grants the Board of Directors the discretion to establish the terms of any future preferred stock issuance, including the number of shared issued, the dividend rate of the shares, whether the dividends are cumulative, whether the shares are voting or non-voting, whether the shares are convertible to common stock and if so, the terms of conversion, whether the shares are redeemable and if so the terms of redemption, sinking fund requirements, liquidation rights and all other relative rights of the preferred shares.
Unregistered Sale of Equity Securities
On September 28, 2009, Capitol City Bancshares, Inc. entered into an agreement to sell 6,078 shares of Series B cumulative, nonvoting, $100 par value preferred stock to an institutional investor for cash consideration of $607,800. The terms of the preferred stock issuance are shown on the Amendment to the Articles of Incorporation attached as Exhibit 3.1(E) to the Companys Quarterly Report filed with the SEC on November 13, 2009. No underwriting discounts or commissions were paid. The transaction is exempt from registration under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, in reliance on Section 4(2) thereof, as a transaction by an issuer not involving a public offering.
24
Table of Contents
ITEM 7. | MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATION |
General
The purpose of this discussion is to focus on information about our financial condition and results of operations which are not otherwise apparent from the consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report. Reference should be made to those statements and the selected financial data presented elsewhere in this report for an understanding of the following discussion and analysis. Historical results of operations and any trends which may appear are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected in future years.
Forward-Looking Statements
This annual report contains certain forward-looking statements which are based on certain assumptions and describe future plans, strategies, and our expectations. These forward-looking statements are generally identified by use of the words believe, expect, intend, anticipate, estimate, project, or similar expressions. Our ability to predict results or the actual effect of future plans or strategies is inherently uncertain. Factors which could have a material adverse effect on our operations include, but are not limited to, changes in interest rates, general economic conditions, legislation and regulation, monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. Government, including policies of the U.S. Treasury and the Federal Reserve Board, the quality or composition of our loan or securities portfolio, demand for loan products, deposit flows, competition, demand for financial services in our market area, and accounting principles and guidelines. You should consider these risks and uncertainties in evaluating forward-looking statements and should not place undue reliance on such statements. We will not publicly release the result of any revisions which may be made to any forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date of such statements or to reflect the occurrence of anticipated or unanticipated events.
Summary
During 2010, we experienced decreases in total assets, total loans, and total deposits. As of December 31, 2010, we reported total assets of $295.3 million, a decline of 7.0% over 2009. Total interest-earning assets decreased by $27.6 million, or 10.1%, and total deposits decreased by $4.8 million, or 1.7% from 2009 to 2010. Total loans decreased by $5.2 million, or 2.2%, as compared to the same period in 2009. We had net income of $37,000 for the year ended December 31, 2010 as compared to net losses of $10.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2009.
Critical Accounting Policies
We have established policies to govern the application of accounting principles in the preparation of our financial statements. Our significant accounting policies are described in Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements. Certain accounting policies involve assumptions and decisions by management which may have a material impact on the carrying value of certain assets and liabilities, and the results of operations. We consider these accounting policies to be our critical accounting policies. The assumptions and decisions used by management are based on current historical data as well as other factors which are believed to be reasonable considering the circumstances.
Allowance for Loan Losses
We believe the allowance for loan losses is a critical accounting policy that requires the most significant decisions and estimates used in the preparation of our consolidated financial statements. The allowance for loan losses represents managements estimate of probable loan losses inherent in the loan portfolio.
The allowance is an amount that management believes will be adequate to absorb estimated losses relating to specifically identified loans, as well as probable credit losses inherent in the balance of the loan portfolio. The allowance for loan losses is evaluated on a regular basis by management and is based upon managements periodic review of the collectibility of loans in light of historical experience, the nature and volume of the loan portfolio, overall portfolio quality, review of specific problem loans, current economic conditions that may affect the borrowers ability to pay, estimated value of underlying collateral and prevailing economic conditions. This evaluation is inherently subjective as it requires estimates that are susceptible to significant revision as more information becomes available.
A substantial portion of our loan portfolio is secured by commercial real estate and residential real estate, with a concentration in church loans. The majority of those loans are secured by real estate in our primary market areas. The ultimate collectibility of a substantial portion of our loan portfolio is susceptible to changes to market conditions in our primary market areas.
25
Table of Contents
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Liquidity management involves the matching of the cash flow requirements of customers who may be either depositors desiring to withdraw funds or borrowers needing assurance that sufficient funds will be available to meet their credit needs and our ability to meet those needs. We seek to meet liquidity requirements primarily through management of federal funds sold, securities available for sale, monthly amortizing loans, and the repayment of maturing single payment loans. We also maintain relationships with correspondent banks which can provide funds on short notice.
Our liquidity and capital resources are monitored on a periodic basis by management and state and federal regulatory authorities. At December 31, 2010, our liquidity ratio was considered less than satisfactory at 7.1%, which is lower than our policy minimum of 15%. We review liquidity on a periodic basis to monitor and adjust liquidity as necessary. We have the ability to adjust liquidity by selling securities available for sale, selling participations in loans and accessing available funds through various borrowing arrangements with correspondent banks.
At December 31, 2010, our capital to asset ratios were considered under capitalized based on guidelines established by regulatory authorities. During 2010, our total equity decreased by $811,000. This decrease consists of dividends declared of $62,000 and a decrease in accumulated other comprehensive income of $1 million, offset by issuances of common stock of $260,000 and net income of $37,000. At December 31, 2010, our total stockholders equity was $9.2 million.
The primary source of funds available to the holding company is the payment of dividends by our subsidiaries. Banking regulations limit the amount of the dividends that may be paid by our bank subsidiary without prior approval of the Banks regulatory agency. Currently, no dividends can be paid by the Bank to the holding company without regulatory approval. The payment of dividends is decided by the Board of Directors based on factors available to them at the time of declaration.
Banking regulations require us to maintain minimum capital levels in relation to assets. At December 31, 2010, the Companys and Banks capital ratios were considered under capitalized based on regulatory minimum capital requirements. The minimum capital requirements and the actual capital ratios on a consolidated basis and for the Bank at December 31, 2010 are as follows:
Company | Bank | Minimum Requirement for Compliance with Consent Order |
||||||||||
Leverage capital ratio |
4.17 | % | 4.31 | % | 8.00 | % | ||||||
Risk-based capital ratios: |
||||||||||||
Tier 1 capital |
4.96 | % | 5.12 | % | N/A | |||||||
Total capital |
6.21 | % | 6.38 | % | 10.00 | % |
We are not aware of any other recommendations by the regulatory authorities, events or trends, which, if they were to be implemented, would have a material effect on our liquidity, capital resources, or operations.
Contractual Obligations and Off-Balance Sheet Commitments
The Bank, in the normal course of business, commits to extend credit in the form of letters of credit and lines of credit. The amount of outstanding loan commitments and letters of credit at December 31, 2010 and 2009 were $7.4 and $10.9 million, respectively. Commitments to extend credit generally have fixed expiration dates or other termination provisions and may require payment of a fee. Since many of the commitments expire without being drawn upon, the total commitment amounts do not necessarily represent future cash requirements.
26
Table of Contents
The following table presents the Companys contractual obligations as of December 31, 2010.
Payments Due After December 31, 2010 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Total | 1 Year or Less |
1-3 Years |
4-5 Years |
After 5 Years |
||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in Thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Note payable |
$ | 275 | $ | 275 | $ | | $ | | $ | | ||||||||||
Company guaranteed trust-preferred securities |
3,403 | | | | 3,403 | |||||||||||||||
Total contractual cash obligations |
$ | 3,678 | $ | 275 | $ | | $ | | $ | 3,403 | ||||||||||
We did not have any material commitments for capital expenditures at December 31, 2010.
Effects of Inflation
The impact of inflation on banks differs from its impact on non-financial institutions. Banks, as financial intermediaries, have assets which are primarily monetary in nature and which tend to fluctuate in concert with inflation. A bank can reduce the impact of inflation if it can manage its rate sensitivity gap. This gap represents the difference between rate sensitive assets and rate sensitive liabilities. We, through our asset-liability committee, attempt to structure the assets and liabilities and manage the rate sensitivity gap, thereby seeking to minimize the potential effects of inflation. For information on the management of our interest rate sensitive assets and liabilities, see the Asset/Liability Management section.
BALANCE SHEETS
Total assets decreased approximately $22.1 million or 7.0% from 2009 to 2010 compared to an increase of $16.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2009. The most significant decrease was in total securities which decreased by $15.3 million. Our loan to deposit ratio was 85.6% at December 31, 2010 compared to 86% at December 31, 2009.
Total deposits decreased by $4.8 million or 1.17% as compared to a $10.2 million increase in 2009. The decrease was made up of a decrease in interest-bearing deposits of $1.7 million and a decrease in noninterest-bearing deposits of $3.1 million. Time deposits of $100,000 or more increased during this same time period by $65.3 million, to $113.0 million, while other time deposits decreased during the period by $65.5 million, to $103.0 million. Noninterest-bearing deposits accounted for 8.9% and 9.9% of total deposits at December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. Brokered certificates of deposit decreased $18.0 million to $19.6 million as of December 31, 2010.
Average total assets decreased $2.4 million from 2009 to 2010. Average interest-earning assets decreased $2.6 million from 2009 to 2010, including an increase in average total loans of $3.0 million, and an increase in federal funds sold of $2.4 million, offset by a decrease in securities of $8.1 million. Average interest-bearing liabilities increased during the same period by $4.4 million from $268.0 to $272.4 million, largely due to an increase of $2.8 million in average Federal Home Loan Bank advances and $2.2 million in average interest bearing deposits. These increases and decreases in average balances for the year ended December 31, 2010 reflect managements attempts to maximize interest-earning assets and the overall margin.
The specific economic and credit risks associated with our loan portfolio, especially the real estate portfolio, include, but are not limited to, a general downturn in the economy which could affect unemployment rates in our market areas, general real estate market deterioration, interest rate fluctuations, deteriorated collateral, title defects, inaccurate appraisals, and financial deterioration of borrowers. Construction and development lending can also present other specific risks to the lender such as whether developers can find builders to buy lots for home construction, whether the builders can obtain financing for the construction, whether the builders can sell the home to a buyer, and whether the buyer can obtain permanent financing. Currently, real estate values and employment trends in our market areas have remained stable.
We constantly attempt to reduce economic and credit risks not only by adherence to loan to value guidelines, but also by investigating the creditworthiness of our borrowers and monitoring the borrowers financial position. Also, we periodically review our lending policies and procedures to insure that we are complying with external rules and regulations as well as internal policies. State banking regulations limit exposure by prohibiting secured loan relationships that exceed 25% of our statutory capital and unsecured loan relationships that exceed 15% of statutory capital.
27
Table of Contents
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Our profitability is determined by our ability to effectively manage interest income and expense, to minimize loan and securities losses, to generate noninterest income, and to control noninterest expense. Because interest rates are determined by market forces and economic conditions beyond our control, the ability to generate net interest income is dependent upon our ability to obtain an adequate spread between the rate earned on interest-earning assets and the rate paid on interest-bearing liabilities. Thus, the key performance measure for net interest income is the interest margin or net yield, which is net interest income divided by total average interest-earning assets. Interest-earning assets consist of interest-bearing deposits at other financial institutions, loans, securities, and federal funds sold. Interest-bearing liabilities consist of interest-bearing deposits, note payable, federal funds purchased, Federal Home Loan Bank advances, securities sold under repurchase agreements, and trust preferred securities.
The yield on interest-earning assets decreased by 34 basis points to 5.83% in 2010, as compared to 6.17% in 2009. The decrease in the yield on interest-earning assets is primarily the result of the decrease in the yield on average loans of 29 basis points to 6.66% in 2010 as compared to 6.95% in 2009 and the decrease in the yield on average taxable securities of 82 basis points to 2.25% as compared to 3.07% in 2009. Average loans represented 81.6% and 79.7% of total interest-earning assets at December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. The net effect on net interest income was an increase of $1.8 million, or 29% as compared to 2009. The net yield on average interest-earning assets increased 70 basis points to 3.02% during 2010 from 2.32% during 2009. The yield on average interest-bearing liabilities decreased 112 basis points to 2.75% in 2010 compared to 3.87% in 2009. Brokered deposits typically demand higher rates which has directly impacted our net interest margin. Brokered deposits are a secondary source of funding loan demand, and management has worked to reduce dependency on this funding source. The yield on interest-earning assets and rates paid on interest-bearing liabilities is impacted by the 400 basis point decrease in Prime Rate since December 31, 2007, and the fact that Prime has not changed since December 2008.
The allowance for loan losses represents an allowance for potential losses in the loan portfolio. The provision for loan losses is a charge to operations which we determine is necessary to adequately fund the allowance for loan losses. The allowance is based on a number of factors including the growth of the loan portfolio, net charge-offs incurred, past experience, and our review and evaluation of potential losses in the loan portfolio. The provision for loan losses decreased for the year ended December 31, 2010 from $9.5 million to $470,000, or by $9.0 million.
Total loan charge-offs decreased by $5.2 million from $7.4 million in 2009 to $2.2 million for the year ended 2010, and recoveries increased from $105,000 to $270,000, resulting in net charge-offs of $1.9 million and $7.2 million for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. The decrease in net charge-offs of $5.2 million resulted in a net charge-off to average loans ratio of 0.78% in 2010 as compared to 3.05% in 2009.
Our allowance for loan loss was $5.2 and $6.6 million at December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. The allowance as a percentage of total loans decreased to 2.21% in 2010 as compared to 2.76% in 2009. As of December 31, 2010, there were $50.4 million of impaired loans as compared to $36.6 million in 2009. Impaired loans consist of non-accrual loans and other loans specifically identified as impaired, and we have determined that a valuation allowance of approximately $2.0 million is required for these loans as of December 31, 2010. Due to collateral values on the underlying loans, we do not anticipate significant additional losses related to identified impaired loans. Past due loans greater than 90 days and still accruing interest increased at December 31, 2010 as compared to 2009, from $2,000 to $620,000. In addition to non-accrual loans, the Company also has foreclosed real estate, which is considered a nonperforming asset. At December 31, 2010, the balance in foreclosed real estate was $8.9 compared to $6.3 million at December 31, 2009. Foreclosed real estate consists of several pieces of property which are being carried at fair value. Management does not anticipate any significant additional losses related to foreclosed real estate. Considering all these circumstances and the provisions for loan losses recognized in 2010, we believe that the allowance for loan losses is adequate to cover any potential losses in the loan portfolio at December 31, 2010.
Other income decreased $257,000 or 9.0% compared to and increase of $185,000 in 2009. Included in other income are service charges on deposit accounts which include monthly service charges on transaction accounts, insufficient funds charges, and other miscellaneous maintenance fees. The amount of service charges fluctuates with the volume of transaction accounts and the volume of NSF activity. Approximately 68% and 70% of the service charge income is generated from insufficient funds charges for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively.
Other expenses decreased $1.7 million or 14.6% during 2010. This decrease is primarily a result of other operating expenses decreasing $1.2 million, and a decrease in salaries and benefits of $537,000. The decrease in other operating expenses is largely due to decreases of $1.1 million in expenses related to other real estate owned. The decrease in salaries and benefits is due to reductions in the number of employees, reductions in certain benefits, and salary cuts taken by certain employees. The number of employees decreased in 2010 from 88 to 78. Occupancy and equipment expenses decreased by $24,000. We continue to be a high volume, consumer oriented bank. This strategy continues to be beneficial to us in many ways; however, with high volume generally comes increased expenses, costs and operating losses. We closely monitor these activities and the related costs.
28
Table of Contents
During 2010 and 2009, we recognized income tax benefits of $- and $1.7 million, respectively. The effective tax rate was (-%) and (14%) for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009. We continue to invest in tax-free securities as a means of minimizing our tax expense.
SELECTED FINANCIAL INFORMATION AND STATISTICAL DATA
The tables and schedules on the following pages set forth certain significant financial information and statistical data with respect to: the distribution of assets, liabilities and stockholders equity; interest rates and interest differentials; interest rate sensitivity gap ratios; the security portfolio; the loan portfolio, including types of loans, maturities and sensitivities to changes in interest rates and risk elements; summary of the loan loss experience and allowance for loan losses; types of deposits; and the return on equity and assets.
Average Balances
The condensed average balance sheets for the periods included are presented below.(1)
December 31, | ||||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
(Dollars in Thousands) | ||||||||
ASSETS | ||||||||
Cash and due from banks |
$ | 8,654 | $ | 7,540 | ||||
Interest-bearing deposits in other financial institutions |
182 | 19 | ||||||
Taxable securities |
45,863 | 52,872 | ||||||
Nontaxable securities |
536 | 1,626 | ||||||
Unrealized gains on securities available for sale |
644 | 258 | ||||||
Federal funds sold |
2,449 | 64 | ||||||
Loans (2)(3) |
217,778 | 214,797 | ||||||
Allowance for loan losses |
(5,812 | ) | (3,872 | ) | ||||
Other assets |
44,327 | 43,686 | ||||||
Total assets |
$ | 314,621 | $ | 316,990 | ||||
Total interest-earning assets |
$ | 266,808 | $ | 269,378 | ||||
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY | ||||||||
Deposits: |
||||||||
Noninterest-bearing demand |
$ | 28,327 | $ | 28,607 | ||||
Interest-bearing demand and savings |
35,999 | 34,942 | ||||||
Time |
219,120 | 218,022 | ||||||
Total deposits |
283,446 | 281,571 | ||||||
Federal funds purchased |
1,339 | 579 | ||||||
Federal Home Loan Bank advances |
10,657 | 7,818 | ||||||
Note payable |
275 | 335 | ||||||
Securities sold under repurchase agreements |
1,612 | 2,937 | ||||||
Company guaranteed trust preferred securities |
3,403 | 3,403 | ||||||
Other liabilities |
4,107 | 2,529 | ||||||
Total liabilities |
304,839 | 299,172 | ||||||
Stockholders equity (4) |
9,782 | 17,818 | ||||||
$ | 314,621 | $ | 316,990 | |||||
Total interest-bearing liabilities |
$ | 272,406 | $ | 268,037 | ||||
(1) | Average balances were determined using the daily average balances. |
(2) | Nonaccrual loans of $23.8 million and $22.5 million are included in the average balances of loans for 2010 and 2009, respectively. |
(3) | Loans are net of deferred loan fees and unearned interest. |
(4) | Includes average unrealized losses on securities available for sale, net of tax. |
29
Table of Contents
Interest Income and Interest Expense
The following table sets forth the amount of our interest income or interest expense for each category of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities and the average interest rate for total interest-earning assets and total interest-bearing liabilities, net interest spread and net yield on average interest-earning assets.
Years Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||||
Interest | Average Rate |
Interest | Average Rate |
|||||||||||||
(Dollars in Thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
INTEREST INCOME: |
||||||||||||||||
Interest on loans(1) |
$ | 14,497 | 6.66 | % | $ | 14,937 | 6.95 | % | ||||||||
Interest on deposits in banks |
3 | 1.64 | | | ||||||||||||
Interest on taxable securities |
1,029 | 2.24 | 1,624 | 3.07 | ||||||||||||
Interest on nontaxable securities(2) |
18 | 3.32 | 59 | 3.61 | ||||||||||||
Interest on federal funds sold |
5 | 0.20 | | | ||||||||||||
Total interest income |
15,552 | 5.83 | 16,620 | 6.17 | ||||||||||||
INTEREST EXPENSE: |
||||||||||||||||
Interest on interest-bearing demand and savings deposits |
380 | 1.05 | % | 647 | 1.85 | % | ||||||||||
Interest on time deposits |
6,833 | 3.12 | 9,476 | 4.35 | ||||||||||||
Interest on federal funds purchased |
21 | 1.57 | 9 | 1.51 | ||||||||||||
Interest on Federal Home Loan Bank advances |
92 | 0.86 | 62 | 0.79 | ||||||||||||
Interest on note payable |
17 | 6.30 | 19 | 5.72 | ||||||||||||
Interest on securities sold under repurchase agreements |
22 | 1.36 | 18 | 0.61 | ||||||||||||
Interest on company guaranteed trust preferred securities |
127 | 3.74 | 140 | 4.13 | ||||||||||||
Total interest expense |
7,492 | 2.75 | 10,371 | 3.87 | ||||||||||||
NET INTEREST INCOME |
$ | 8,060 | $ | 6,249 | ||||||||||||
Net interest spread |
3.08 | % | 2.30 | % | ||||||||||||
Net yield on average interest-earning assets |
3.02 | % | 2.32 | % | ||||||||||||
(1) | Interest on loans includes approximately $1.3 million and $1.6 million of loan fee income for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009. |
(2) | Yields on nontaxable securities are not presented on a tax-equivalent basis. |
Rate and Volume Analysis
The following table describes the extent to which changes in interest rates and changes in volume of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities have affected our interest income and expense during the year indicated. For each category of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities, information is provided on changes attributable to (1) change in volume (change in volume multiplied by old rate); (2) change in rate (change in rate multiplied by old volume); and (3) a combination of change in rate and change in volume. The changes in interest income and interest expense attributable to both volume and rate have been allocated proportionately to the change due to volume and the change due to rate.
30
Table of Contents
2010 vs. 2009 Changes Due To: |
||||||||||||
Rate | Volume | Increase (Decrease) |
||||||||||
(Dollars in Thousands) | ||||||||||||
Increase (decrease) in: |
||||||||||||
Interest on loans |
$ | (642 | ) | $ | 201 | $ | (441 | ) | ||||
Interest on deposits in banks |
| 3 | 3 | |||||||||
Interest on taxable securities |
(399 | ) | (195 | ) | (594 | ) | ||||||
Interest on nontaxable securities |
(5 | ) | (36 | ) | (41 | ) | ||||||
Interest on federal funds sold |
| 5 | 5 | |||||||||
Total interest income |
(1,046 | ) | (22 | ) | (1,068 | ) | ||||||
Interest on interest-bearing demand and savings deposits |
(287 | ) | 20 | (267 | ) | |||||||
Interest on time deposits |
(2,691 | ) | 48 | (2,643 | ) | |||||||
Interest on federal funds purchased |
| 12 | 12 | |||||||||
Interest on Federal Home Loan Bank advances |
6 | 24 | 30 | |||||||||
Interest on note payable |
2 | (4 | ) | (2 | ) | |||||||
Interest on securities sold under repurchase agreements |
15 | (11 | ) | 4 | ||||||||
Interest on company guaranteed trust preferred securities |
(13 | ) | | (13 | ) | |||||||
Total interest expense |
(2,968 | ) | 89 | (2,879 | ) | |||||||
Net interest income |
$ | 1,922 | $ | (111 | ) | $ | 1,811 | |||||
Asset/Liability Management
Our objective is to manage assets and liabilities to provide a satisfactory, consistent level of profitability within the framework of established cash, loan, investment, and capital policies. Certain officers are charged with the responsibility for monitoring policies and procedures that are designed to ensure acceptable composition of the asset/liability mix. It is the overall philosophy of management to support asset growth primarily through growth of core deposits of all categories deposited by individuals and corporations in our primary market area.
Our asset/liability mix is monitored on a regular basis. The objective of this policy is to monitor interest rate sensitive assets and liabilities so as to minimize the impact of substantial movements in interest rates on earnings. An asset or liability is considered to be interest rate-sensitive if it will reprice or mature within the time period analyzed, usually one year or less. The interest rate-sensitivity gap is the difference between the interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities scheduled to mature or reprice within such time period. A gap is considered positive when the amount of interest rate-sensitive assets exceeds the amount of interest rate-sensitive liabilities. A gap is considered negative when the amount of interest rate-sensitive liabilities exceeds the interest rate-sensitive assets. During a period of rising interest rates, a negative gap would tend to adversely affect net interest income, while a positive gap would tend to result in an increase in net interest income. Conversely, during a period of falling interest rates, a negative gap would tend to result in an increase in net interest income, while a positive gap would tend to adversely affect net interest income. If our assets and liabilities were equally flexible and move concurrently, the impact of any increase or decrease in interest rates on net interest income would be minimal.
A simple interest rate gap analysis by itself may not be an accurate indicator of how net interest income will be affected by changes in interest rates. Accordingly, we also evaluate how the repayment of particular assets and liabilities is impacted by changes in interest rates.
Income associated with interest-earning assets and costs associated with interest-bearing liabilities may not be affected uniformly by changes in interest rates. In addition, the magnitude and duration of changes in interest rates may have a significant impact on net interest income. For example, although certain assets and liabilities may have similar maturities or periods of repricing, they may react in different degrees to changes in market interest rates. Interest rates on certain types of assets and liabilities fluctuate in advance of changes in general market rates, while interest rates on other types may lag behind changes in general market rates. In addition, certain assets, such as adjustable rate mortgage loans, have features (generally referred to as interest rate caps and floors) which limit the amount of changes in interest rates. Prepayment and early withdrawal levels also could deviate significantly from those assumed in calculating the interest rate gap. The ability of many borrowers to service their debts also may decrease during periods of rising interest rates.
31
Table of Contents
Changes in interest rates also affect our liquidity position. We currently price deposits in response to market rates and it is our intention to continue this policy. If deposits are not priced in response to market rates, a loss of deposits could occur which would negatively affect our liquidity position.
At December 31, 2010, our cumulative one year interest rate sensitivity gap ratio was 66%. The Companys targeted ratio is 80% to 120% in this time horizon. This indicates that our interest-bearing liabilities will reprice during this period at a rate faster than our interest-earning assets.
The following table sets forth the distribution of the repricing of our interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities as of December 31, 2010, as well as the interest rate sensitivity gap (i.e., interest rate sensitive assets less interest rate sensitive liabilities), the cumulative interest rate sensitivity gap, the interest rate sensitivity gap ratio (i.e., interest rate sensitive assets divided by interest rate sensitive liabilities) and the cumulative interest rate sensitivity gap ratio. The table also sets forth the time periods in which interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities will mature or may reprice in accordance with their contractual terms. However, the table does not necessarily indicate the impact of general interest rate movements on the net interest margin since the repricing of various categories of assets and liabilities is subject to competitive pressures and the needs of our customers. In addition, various assets and liabilities indicated as repricing within the same period may in fact reprice at different times within such period and at different rates.
Within Three Months |
After Three Months But Within One Year |
After One Year But Within Five Years |
After Five Years |
Total | ||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in Thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Interest-earning assets: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Interest-bearing deposits |
$ | 455 | $ | | $ | | $ | | $ | 455 | ||||||||||
Federal funds sold |
730 | | | | 730 | |||||||||||||||
Securities available for sale |
50 | | | 36,962 | 37,012 | |||||||||||||||
Restricted equity securities |
1,025 | | | | 1,025 | |||||||||||||||
Loans(1) |
81,120 | 23,949 | 97,550 | 3,379 | 205,998 | |||||||||||||||
83,380 | 23,949 | 97,550 | 40,341 | 245,220 | ||||||||||||||||
Interest-bearing liabilities: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Interest-bearing demand deposits and savings |
34,666 | | | | 34,666 | |||||||||||||||
Certificates, less than $100,000 |
20,001 | 35,346 | 47,625 | | 102,972 | |||||||||||||||
Certificates, $100,000 and over |
16,514 | 51,035 | 45,471 | | 113,020 | |||||||||||||||
Note payable |
| 275 | | | 275 | |||||||||||||||
Federal Home Loan Bank advances |
| 5,500 | | | 5,500 | |||||||||||||||
Company guaranteed trust preferred securities |
| | | 3,403 | 3,403 | |||||||||||||||
71,181 | 92,156 | 93,096 | 3,403 | 259,836 | ||||||||||||||||
Interest rate sensitivity gap |
$ | 12,199 | $ | (68,207 | ) | $ | 4,454 | $ | 36,938 | |||||||||||
Cumulative interest rate sensitivity gap |
$ | 12,199 | $ | (56,008 | ) | $ | (51,554 | ) | $ | (14,616 | ) | |||||||||
Interest rate sensitivity gap ratio |
1.17 | 0.26 | 1.05 | |||||||||||||||||
Cumulative interest rate sensitivity gap ratio |
1.17 | 0.66 | 0.80 | 0.94 | ||||||||||||||||
(1) | Excludes nonaccrual loans of $29.5 million. |
32
Table of Contents
We have included all interest-bearing demand deposits and savings deposits in the three month maturity category because these deposits can be withdrawn immediately and reprice immediately. However, based on our experience, the majority of these deposits are expected to remain in the Bank regardless of interest rate movements.
We actively manage the mix of asset and liability maturities to control the effects of changes in the general level of interest rates on net interest income. Except for its effect on the general level of interest rates, inflation does not have a material impact on us due to the rate variability and short-term maturities of our earning assets. In particular, approximately 51% of the loan portfolio is comprised of loans that mature or reprice within one year.
SECURITIES PORTFOLIO
Types of Securities
The carrying values of securities at the dates indicated are summarized as follows:
December 31, | ||||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
(Dollars in Thousands) | ||||||||
U.S. Government and federal agencies (includes U.S. Treasury securities) |
$ | 34,127 | $ | 51,548 | ||||
State and municipal securities |
2,208 | | ||||||
Other securities, including equity securities(1) |
1,703 | 1,851 | ||||||
$ | 38,038 | $ | 53,399 | |||||
(1) | For presentation purposes, the equity securities are not included in the maturity table below because they have no contractual date. |
Maturities
The amounts of debt securities in each category as of December 31, 2010 are shown in the following table according to contractual maturity classifications (1) one year or less, (2) after one through five years, (3) after five through ten years and (4) greater than ten years.
U.S. Government
and Federal Agencies (Includes U.S. Treasury Securities) |
State and Municipal Securities |
Other Securities | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Amount | Yield (1) | Amount | Yield | Amount | Yield | |||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in Thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
After one through five years |
$ | | | % | $ | | | % | $ | | | % | ||||||||||||
After five through ten years |
| | 980 | 2.94 | 525 | 9.50 | ||||||||||||||||||
Greater than ten years |
34,127 | 3.49 | 1,228 | 3.86 | 103 | 3.59 | ||||||||||||||||||
$ | 34,127 | 3.49 | % | $ | 2,208 | 3.45 | % | $ | 628 | 8.53 | % | |||||||||||||
(1) | Yields were computed using coupon interest, adding discount accretion or subtracting premium amortization, as appropriate, on a ratable basis over the life of each security. |
For the purpose of the maturity table, mortgage-backed securities, which are not due at a single maturity date, have been allocated over maturity groupings based on the weighted-average contractual maturities of underlying collateral. The mortgage-backed securities may mature earlier than their weighted-average contractual maturities because of principal prepayments.
33
Table of Contents
LOAN PORTFOLIO
Types of Loans
The amount of total loans outstanding at the indicated dates is shown in the following table according to type of loans.
December 31, | ||||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
(Dollars in Thousands) | ||||||||
Unsecured |
$ | 883 | $ | 1,073 | ||||
Cash value |
4,825 | 5,391 | ||||||
Residential real estate |
38,448 | 36,964 | ||||||
Commercial real estate |
186,282 | 189,191 | ||||||
Business assets |
3,386 | 6,278 | ||||||
Vehicles |
2,586 | 2,973 | ||||||
Other |
106 | 109 | ||||||
$ | 236,516 | $ | 241,979 | |||||
The following is a category detail of our allowance percentage and reserve balance by loan type at December 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009:
Loan Group Description |
December 31, 2010 Calculated Reserves |
December 31, 2010 Reserve % |
December 31, 2009 Calculated Reserves |
December 31, 2009 Reserve % |
||||||||||||
Unsecured |
$ | 63,020 | 7.14 | % | $ | 121,061 | 12.31 | % | ||||||||
Cash value |
5,210 | 0.11 | % | 68,835 | 1.28 | % | ||||||||||
Residential real estate |
2,258,833 | 5.88 | % | 2,945,465 | 7.35 | % | ||||||||||
Commercial real estate |
2,234,925 | 1.20 | % | 2,821,151 | 1.48 | % | ||||||||||
Business assets |
316,844 | 9.36 | % | 483,536 | 7.60 | % | ||||||||||
Vehicles |
141,759 | 5.48 | % | 209,172 | 7.02 | % | ||||||||||
Other |
5 | | % | 41 | 0.04 | % | ||||||||||
Unallocated |
203,168 | | % | | | % | ||||||||||
Total allowance for loan loss |
$ | 5,223,764 | 2.21 | % | $ | 6,649,261 | 2.76 | % | ||||||||
Maturities and Sensitivities to Changes in Interest Rates
Total loans as of December 31, 2010 are shown in the following table according to maturity classifications (1) one year or less (2) after one through five years and (3) after five years.
Dollars in Thousands | ||||
Commercial |
||||
One year or less |
$ | 6,214 | ||
After one through five years |
1,810 | |||
After five years |
2 | |||
$ | 8,026 | |||
Construction |
||||
One year or less |
$ | 16,986 | ||
After one through five years |
4,340 | |||
After five years |
1 | |||
$ | 21,327 | |||
Other |
||||
One year or less |
$ | 107,625 | ||
After one through five years |
97,091 | |||
After five years |
2,447 | |||
$ | 207,163 | |||
$ | 236,516 | |||
34
Table of Contents
The following table summarizes loans at December 31, 2010 with due dates after one year which have predetermined interest rates or floating or adjustable interest rates.
Dollars in Thousands | ||||
Predetermined interest rates |
$ | 53,715 | ||
Floating or adjustable interest rates |
51,976 | |||
$ | 105,691 | |||
Risk Elements
The following table presents, at the dates indicated, the aggregate of nonperforming loans for the categories indicated.
December 31, | ||||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
(Dollars in Thousands) | ||||||||
Loans accounted for on a nonaccrual basis |
$ | 29,547 | $ | 22,511 | ||||
Installment loans and term loans contractually past due ninety days or more as to interest or principal payments and still accruing |
619 | 2 | ||||||
Loans, the terms of which have been renegotiated to provide a reduction or deferral of interest or principal because of deterioration in the financial position of the borrower |
19,807 | 13,777 | ||||||
Loans accruing about which there are serious doubts as to the ability of the borrower to comply with present loan repayment terms (excludes nonaccrual) |
20,855 | 15,743 |
A loan is placed on nonaccrual status when, in the opinion of management, the collection of interest income is considered doubtful. Interest on loans that are classified as nonaccrual is recognized when received. In some cases, where borrowers are experiencing financial difficulties, loans may be restructured to provide terms significantly different from the original contractual terms.
The reduction in interest income associated with nonaccrual loans as of December 31, 2010 is as follows:
Interest income that would have been recorded on nonaccrual loans under original terms |
$ | 1,878,357 | ||
Interest income that was recorded on nonaccrual loans |
$ | 407,877 |
In the opinion of management, any loans classified by regulatory authorities as doubtful, substandard or special mention that have not been disclosed above do not (i) represent or result from trends or uncertainties which management reasonably expects will materially impact future operating results, liquidity, or capital resources, or (ii) represent material credits about which management is aware of any information which causes management to have serious doubts as to the ability of such borrowers to comply with the loan repayment terms. Any loans classified by regulatory authorities as loss have been charged off.
SUMMARY OF LOAN LOSS EXPERIENCE
The provision for loan losses is created by direct charges to operations. Losses on loans are charged against the allowance in the period in which such loans, in managements opinion, become uncollectible. Recoveries during the period are credited to this allowance. The factors that influence managements judgment in determining the amount charged to operating expense are: composition of the loan portfolio, evaluation of possible future losses, current economic conditions, past experience, and other relevant factors. The allowance for loan losses is reviewed periodically and based on managements evaluation of current risk characteristics of the loan portfolio, as well as the impact of prevailing and expected economic business conditions. Management considers the allowance for loan losses adequate to cover possible loan losses on the loans outstanding.
35
Table of Contents
The following table summarizes average loan balances for each year determined using the daily average balances during the year; changes in the allowance for loan losses arising from loans charged off; additions to the allowance which have been recovered or charged to operating expense; and the ratio of net charge-offs during the year to average loans.
December 31, | ||||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
(Dollars in Thousands) | ||||||||
Average balance of loans outstanding |
$ | 242,979 | $ | 237,297 | ||||
Balance of allowance for loan losses at beginning of year |
$ | 6,649 | $ | 4,369 | ||||
Charge-offs: |
||||||||
Installment |
(80 | ) | (199 | ) | ||||
Commercial |
(11 | ) | (659 | ) | ||||
Real estate |
(2,074 | ) | (6,497 | ) | ||||
(2,165 | ) | (7,355 | ) | |||||
Recoveries: |
||||||||
Installment |
29 | 58 | ||||||
Commercial |
44 | 6 | ||||||
Real estate |
197 | 41 | ||||||
270 | 105 | |||||||
Net charge-offs |
(1,895 | ) | (7,250 | ) | ||||
Addition to allowance charged to operating expenses |
470 | 9,530 | ||||||
Balance of allowance for loan losses |
$ | 5,224 | $ | 6,649 | ||||
Ratio of net loan charge-offs to average loans |
0.78 | % | 3.05 | % | ||||
DEPOSITS
Average amount of deposits and average rate paid thereon, classified as to noninterest-bearing demand deposits, interest-bearing demand and savings deposits and time deposits, for the year indicated is presented below.
Years Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||||
Amount | Rate | Amount | Rate | |||||||||||||
(Dollars in Thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
Noninterest-bearing demand |
$ | 28,327 | | % | $ | 28,607 | | % | ||||||||
Interest-bearing demand and savings |
35,999 | 1.05 | 34,942 | 1.85 | ||||||||||||
Time deposits |
219,120 | 3.12 | 218,022 | 4.35 | ||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 283,446 | 2.83 | $ | 281,571 | 4.00 | ||||||||||
The following table presents the maturities of time deposits of $100,000 or more as of December 31, 2010 for the periods indicated.
(Dollars in Thousands) | ||||
Three months or less |
$ | 16,514 | ||
Over three through twelve months |
51,035 | |||
Over twelve months |
45,471 | |||
Total |
$ | 113,020 | ||
36
Table of Contents
RETURN ON EQUITY AND ASSETS
The following table shows return on assets, return on equity, dividend payout ratio and stockholders equity to assets ratio for the years indicated.
Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
Return on assets (1) |
0.01 | % | (3.33 | )% | ||||
Return on equity (2) |
0.37 | (59.31 | ) | |||||
Dividend payout (3) |
| | ||||||
Equity to assets (4) |
3.11 | 5.62 |
(1) | Net income (loss) divided by average total assets. |
(2) | Net income (loss) divided by average equity. |
(3) | Dividends declared per share of common stock divided by basic loss per share. |
(4) | Average equity divided by average total assets. |
37
Table of Contents
ITEM 8. | FINANCIAL STATEMENTS |
The following consolidated financial statements of the Registrant and its subsidiaries are included on Exhibit 13.1 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K:
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm on Financial Statements
Consolidated Balance SheetsDecember 31, 2010 and 2009
Consolidated Statements of OperationsDecember 31, 2010 and 2009
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive LossDecember 31, 2010 and 2009
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders EquityDecember 31, 2010 and 2009
Consolidated Statements of Cash FlowsDecember 31, 2010 and 2009
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Independent Registered Public Accounting Firms Report on Supplementary Information
Consolidating Balance SheetDecember 31, 2010
Consolidating Statement of OperationsDecember 31, 2010
ITEM 9. | CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURES |
None.
ITEM 9A. | CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES |
As of the end of the period covered by this report, we carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and the Principal Financial and Accounting Officer, of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures. Based on this evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial and Accounting Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are effective.
Managements Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
The management of Capitol City Bancshares, Inc. and subsidiaries is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. This internal control system has been designed to provide reasonable assurance to the Companys management and board
38
Table of Contents
of directors regarding the preparation and fair presentation of the Companys published financial statements.
All internal control systems, no matter how well designed, have inherent limitations. Therefore, even those systems determined to be effective can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation and presentation.
The management of Capitol City Bancshares, Inc. and subsidiaries has assessed the effectiveness of the Companys internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2010. To make this assessment, we used the criteria for effective internal control over financial reporting described in Internal Control-Integrated Framework, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.
Based on our assessment, we believe that, as of December 31, 2010, the Companys internal control over financial reporting met those criteria and is effective.
This annual report does not include an attestation report of the Companys registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting. Managements report was not subject to attestation by the Companys registered public accounting firm pursuant to the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission that permit the Company to provide only managements report in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
ITEM 9B. | OTHER INFORMATION |
None.
39
Table of Contents
ITEM 10. | DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE |
Code of Ethics
Upon written request, the Companys Code of Ethics Policy shall be furnished to shareholders without charge. Please direct your written request to George Andrews, Capitol City Bancshares, Inc., 562 Lee Street, S.W., Atlanta, Georgia 30311.
The remaining information required by this Item is incorporated by reference to the Companys Definitive Proxy Statement to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Regulation 14A within 120 days after the end of the fiscal year covered by this Annual Report.
ITEM 11. | EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION |
The information required by this Item is incorporated by reference to the Companys Definitive Proxy Statement to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Regulation 14A within 120 days after the end of the fiscal year covered by this Annual Report.
ITEM 12. | SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS |
The information required by this Item is incorporated by reference to the Companys Definitive Proxy Statement to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Regulation 14A within 120 days after the end of the fiscal year covered by this Annual Report.
ITEM 13. | CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE |
The information required by this Item is incorporated by reference to the Companys Definitive Proxy Statement to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Regulation 14A within 120 days after the end of the fiscal year covered by this Annual Report.
ITEM 14. | PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES |
The information required by this Item is incorporated by reference to the Companys Definitive Proxy Statement to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Regulation 14A within 120 days after the end of the fiscal year covered by this Annual Report.
40
Table of Contents
ITEM 15. | EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES |
(a) | The following documents are filed as a part of this report: |
(1) Financial Statements: The consolidated balance sheets of Capitol City Bancshares, Inc., and its subsidiaries as of December 31, 2010 and 2009, and the related consolidated statements of operations, consolidated statements of comprehensive income, consolidated statements of stockholders equity and consolidated statements of cash flows for each of the years in the two-year period ended December 31, 2010, together with the related notes and the report of the independent registered public accounting firm, of Nichols Cauley & Associates, LLC.
(2) Financial Statement Schedules: All schedules are omitted as the required information is inapplicable or the information is presented in the financial statements or related notes.
(3) Exhibits: A list of the Exhibits as required by Item 601 of Regulation S-K to be filed as part of this Annual Report is shown on the Exhibit Index filed herewith.
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized on April 15, 2011.
CAPITOL CITY BANCSHARES, INC. | ||
BY: | /s/ George G. Andrews | |
GEORGE G. ANDREWS, PRESIDENT AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER |
41
Table of Contents
POWER OF ATTORNEY
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that each person whose signature appears below constitutes and appoints George G. Andrews and William Thomas, and each of them, his or her attorney-in-fact, each with full power of substitution, for him or her in his or her name, place and stead, in any and all capacities, to sign any amendment to this Annual Report on Form 10-K, and to file the same, with exhibits thereto, and other documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission and hereby ratifies and confirms all that said attorneys-in-fact, or his or her substitute or substitutes, may do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed by the following persons in the capacities indicated on April 15, 2011.
Signature |
Title | |||
/s/ George G. Andrews |
||||
George G. Andrews | Director, President and Chief Executive Officer | |||
/s/ Dr. Gloria Campbell-DHue |
||||
Dr. Gloria Campbell-DHue | Director | |||
/s/ Charles W. Harrison |
||||
Charles W. Harrison | Director | |||
/s/ Robert A. Holmes |
||||
Robert A. Holmes | Director | |||
/s/ Moses M. Jones |
||||
Moses M. Jones | Director | |||
/s/ Marian S. Jordan |
||||
Marian S. Jordan | Director |
[REMAINING SIGNATURES ON NEXT PAGE]
42
Table of Contents
/s/ Roy W. Sweat |
||||
Roy W. Sweat | Director | |||
/s/ William Thomas |
||||
William Thomas | Chairman | |||
/s/ Cordy T. Vivian |
||||
Cordy T. Vivian | Director | |||
/s/ Shelby Wilkes |
||||
Shelby Wilkes | Director | |||
/s/ Tarlee W. Brown |
||||
Tarlee W. Brown | Director | |||
/s/ John T. Harper |
||||
John T. Harper | Director | |||
/s/ Pratape Singh |
||||
Pratape Singh | Director | |||
/s/ Tatina Brooks |
||||
Tatina Brooks | Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) |
43
Table of Contents
Exhibit No. |
Document Description | |
2.1 | Plan of Reorganization and Agreement of Merger, dated April 14, 1998, by and between Capitol City Bancshares, Inc., Capitol City Bank and Trust, and Capitol City Interim, Inc., which Agreement is included as Appendix A to the Proxy Statement included in this Registration Statement filed by Registrant on Form S-4 on September 30, 1998, Registration No. 333-64789 (incorporated by reference as Exhibit 2.1 to the Registrants 10-KSB filed on March 31, 1999). | |
3.1 | Articles of Incorporation of Registrant (incorporated by reference as Exhibit 3.1 to the Registrants 10-KSB filed on March 31, 1999). | |
3.1(A) | Amendment to the Articles of Incorporation of Registrant (incorporated by reference as Exhibit 3.1(A) to the Registrants Annual Report on Form 10-KSB filed on March 31, 2005). | |
3.1(B) | Articles of Amendment to the Articles of Incorporation of the Registrant filed February 9, 2008 (incorporation by referenced as Exhibit 3.1(B) to the Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K filed on February 15, 2008). | |
3.1(C) | Articles of Amendment to the Articles of Incorporation of the Registrant filed February 12, 2008 (incorporation by referenced as Exhibit 3.1(C) to the Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K filed on February 15, 2008). | |
3.1(D) | Articles of Amendment to the Articles of Incorporation of the Registrant filed February 15, 2008 (incorporation by referenced as Exhibit 3.1(D) to the Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K filed on February 15, 2008). | |
3.1(E) | Articles of Amendment to the Articles of Incorporation of the Registrant filed October 14, 2009 (incorporated by reference as Exhibit 3.1(E) to the Registrants Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on November 13, 2009). | |
3.1(F) | Articles of Amendment to the Articles of Incorporation of the Registrant filed July 13, 2010 (incorporated by reference as Exhibit 3.9 to the Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K filed on July 16, 2010). | |
3.2 | Bylaws of Registrant (incorporated by reference as Exhibit 3.2 to the Registrants 10-KSB filed on March 31, 1999). | |
10.1 | Capitol City Bancshares, Inc. Stock Option Plan, executed July 13, 1999 (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to Capitol City Bancshares, Inc. Annual Report on Form 10-KSB, filed with the Commission on March 30, 2000 and incorporated herein by reference). |
44
Table of Contents
10.2 | Stock Option Agreement under the Capitol City Bancshares, Inc. Stock Option Plan between Capitol City Bancshares, Inc. and George Andrews, executed July 13, 1999 (filed as Exhibit 10.2 to Capitol City Bancshares, Inc. Annual Report on Form 10-KSB, filed with the Commission on March 30, 2000 and incorporated herein by reference). | |
10.3 | Stock Option Agreement under the Capitol City Bancshares, Inc. Stock Option Plan between Capitol City Bancshares, Inc. and J. Al Cochran, executed July 13, 1999 that is a sample of the option agreements issued to all directors (filed as Exhibit 10.3 to Capitol City Bancshares, Inc. Annual Report on Form 10-KSB, filed with the Commission on March 30, 2000 and incorporated herein by reference). | |
13.1 | Consolidated Financial Statements. | |
21.1 | Subsidiaries of the Company. | |
23.1 | Consent of Nichols Cauley & Associates, LLC | |
24.1 | Power of Attorney (on signature page). | |
31.1 | Certification of the Registrants Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. | |
31.2 | Certification of the Registrants Principal Financial and Accounting Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. | |
32.1 | 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 Certifications of the Registrants Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial and Accounting Officer. |
45