2

Table of Contents

3

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

 This Annual Report on Form 10-K contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”) and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). These forward-looking statements are not historical facts but rather are based on current expectations, estimates and projections. We may use words such as “anticipate,” “expect,” “intend,” “plan,” “believe,” “foresee,” “estimate” and variations of these words and similar expressions to identify forward-looking statements. These statements are not guarantees of future performance and are subject to certain risks, uncertainties and other factors, some of which are beyond our control, are difficult to predict and could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed or forecasted. These risks and uncertainties include the following:

·

The availability and adequacy of our cash flow to meet our requirements;

·

Economic, competitive, demographic, business and other conditions in our local and regional markets;

·

Changes or developments in laws, regulations or taxes in our industry;

·

Actions taken or omitted to be taken by third parties including our suppliers and competitors, as well as legislative, regulatory, judicial and other governmental authorities;

·

Competition in our industry;

·

The loss of or failure to obtain any license or permit necessary or desirable in the operation of our business;

·

Changes in our business strategy, capital improvements or development plans;

·

The availability of additional capital to support capital improvements and development; and

·

Other risks identified in this report and in our other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission or the SEC.

This report should be read completely and with the understanding that actual future results may be materially different from what we expect. The forward looking statements included in this report are made as of the date of this report and should be evaluated with consideration of any changes occurring after the date of this Report. We will not update forward-looking statements even though our situation may change in the future and we assume no obligation to update any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.

Use of Term

Except as otherwise indicated by the context, references in this report to “Company”, “FEGR”, “we”, “us” and “our” are references to Friendly Energy Exploration.  All references to “USD” or United States Dollars refer to the legal currency of the United States of America.

4

ITEM 1.   

Formation and Corporate History

Friendly Energy Exploration (the “Company”) was formed under the laws of the State of Nevada on January 7, 1993, under the name Eco-Systems Marketing (“Eco-Systems”). Eco-Systems subsequently changed its name to Rama Financial Corporation in August 1997. In April 1999, the Company’s name changed to Friendly Energy Corporation and then again to Friendly Energy Exploration in March 2008.  The Company is a fully reporting public company.

On October 12, 2010, the Company's common stock was approved by FINRA for trading on the OTC Bulletin Board (“OTCBB”), and began trading on the OTCBB on October 12, 2010 under the symbol FEGR.OB.

On November 12, 2010, we filed an Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation with the Nevada Secretary of State to increase the number of shares that the Company is authorized to issue from 110,000,000, of which 100,000,000 shares are common stock and 10,000,000 are preferred stock, to 310,000,000 shares, of which 290,000,000 are common stock and 20,000,000 are preferred stock.  On November 11, 2010, the Company received approval to file the Amended and Restated Articles from holders of 55.22% of the issued and outstanding common stock of the Company.

Our Business

The Company was originally incorporated to engage in any lawful activity for which corporations may be organized under the General Corporation Law of Nevada.  From its inception in 1993 until 2005, the Company was primarily engaged in establishing itself as an electric service provider (“ESP”) for electricity in California after the State deregulated power. A few years later, the State reversed course and put ESPs out of business.  Subsequently, the Company began marketing cogeneration equipment to companies concerned about high electricity prices and brownouts. For several years the Company was dormant and then in 2005, it began investing in oil and gas joint ventures.

The Company is now in the business of oil and gas exploration and operations and has found a niche market acquiring leases in established, low risk oil fields which have been poorly operated and shut-in.  In 2009, the Company acquired four oil and gas leases in central Texas with twenty-five wells totaling 1,036 acres, of which approximately 560 acres are in defined oil and gas fields. The Company is a registered, “bonded” operator in Texas (Operator No. 286572). Therefore, we are in full control of all operations.  In the first quarter of 2010, the Company acquired a fifth oil and gas lease in Central Texas totaling 1,000 acres with twenty-four wells.

Overview and Mission

The following has been accomplished in 2010:

·

In the first quarter of 2010, the Company acquired a fifth oil and gas lease in Central Texas totally 1,000 acres with twenty-four wells.

·

Refurbished and replaced infrastructure on the leases including tank farms and water injection wells.

·

Reworked 24 wells.  Most of these wells are now producing, but some need additional infrastructure to be completed before producing.

The Company plans the following activities in 2011:

5

·

Complete refurbishment and replacement of infrastructure.

·

Rework several additional wells.

·

Recomplete one Fry well in the deeper Marble Falls formation (this well was drilled to the Marble Falls but never completed in this formation).

·

Drill up to ten new in-fill wells.

·

Acquire additional leases.

Our Oil and Gas Properties

 There are several oil & gas zones underlying the five leases in Central Texas.  On the Panther and Byler Leases, the wells are mostly completed as Fry or Gray sands wells at a depth of approximately 1,200 feet.  Four wells are completed in the Marble Falls sands at a depth of approximately 2,700 feet.  None of the wells on the leases were completed in the Caddo gas zone, which is approximately 300 feet below the Fry sands.  We may want to recomplete some of the Fry wells as Caddo wells.  About one-half mile from our Panther Creek lease, a Caddo well was completed in 2009 with an initial potential of 14 BBL/day and 150 MCF/day.  None of our wells have been completed in the Barnett Shale gas zone, which lies a little below the Marble Falls zone; this zone has not been explored much in Brown County.  On the South Thrifty, the wells are completed in the Chappel Reef and Ellenburger formations at a depth of approximately 2,500 feet.

Spacing for Fry and Gray wells has been reduced to 5 acres and spacing for Marble Falls and Chappel Reef wells has been reduced to 10 acres, representing half of the old spacing.  Many in-fill wells could be drilled on the leases.

Panther Creek Lease: The Panther Creek lease totals 115 acres of which approximately 70% is in defined Fry sand oil field. Of the 13 wells, one is a water supply well, three are water injection wells and nine are Fry sand wells. The water supply well is 2,885 feet deep. The Company expects to re-complete this well as a Marble Falls Limestone well or possibly a Barnett Shale well. The original Fry sand well was drilled to 2,680 feet; we expect to re-complete as a Marble Falls Limestone well or possibly a Barnett Shale well. It may be feasible to deepen and re-complete some of the other Fry wells in the Caddo Limestone or Marble Falls Limestone. Panther Creek has a 630 barrel tank farm and all infra-structure is completed.  

Mud Creek Lease: The Mud Creek lease totals 355 acres of which approximately 56% is in a defined Fry Sand oil field. Eight wells that had been producing were plugged several years ago at the mineral owners’ request to get rid of a fraudulent operator. We expect to reenter all eight wells, but for planning purposes we have assumed reentry of five wells. It may be feasible to recomplete some of these Fry wells in the Caddo or Marble Falls. A new tank farm and other infrastructure are needed on the Mud Creek lease.

Hutchins Lease: The Hutchins lease totals 194 acres of which approximately 30% is in defined oil fields.  There are four Fry Sand wells and one Chappel Reef well.  The latter well was the discovery well for the Chappel Reef and has 300 feet of sands.  There were good oil shows, which were estimated could produce 35 to 40 barrels of oil per day, but the gas was even better—maximum open flow potential was 2,500 MCF per day.  In production it did 500 MCF per day with gradual decline.  These wells were plugged in 2001 when the operator had financial problems and oil and gas prices were very low.  We expect to reenter the Chappel Reef well and one of the Fry Sand

6

wells. There is still very good potential for oil and gas production from these wells.  There is very good potential for in-field drilling.  A new tank farm and other infrastructure are needed on the Hutchins lease.

South Thrifty Lease: The South Thrifty lease totals 1,000 acres of which approximately 54% is in defined oil fields.  There are five Chappel Reef and Ellenberger oil wells and eighteen Chappel Reef gas wells.  There is also a water injection well.  Nineteen of the wells are currently producing.  The other five wells need some work.  One of the wells had an initial potential of 792 barrels per day.  Cheap and used casing was installed, which created a hole after only a short time and reduced production to 50 barrels per day.  There is very good potential for in-field drilling.  The South Thrifty lease has five tank farms.

Competition

The oil and gas exploration and production industry is highly competitive. The Company expects to encounter competition from other oil and gas companies in all areas of its operations, including acquisition of leases.

Competitors include major integrated oil and natural gas companies, natural gas pipeline companies, numerous independent oil and natural gas companies, individuals and drilling and income programs. Many of the Company's competitors are large, well-established companies with substantially larger operating staffs and greater capital resources than the Company has and which, in many instances, have been engaged in the energy and/or natural resource production and development business for a much longer time than the Company. These companies may be able to offer more attractive rates for natural gas gathering commitments and to pay more for productive oil and natural gas properties and exploratory prospects than the Company's financial or human resources would permit. The Company's ability to acquire additional properties, discover reserves and attract experienced joint venture partners in the future will be dependent on its ability to evaluate and select suitable properties and to consummate transactions in this highly competitive environment. In addition, joint venture partners may not be available to the Company on terms or at prices which the Company can afford.

The Company will be focusing on smaller projects generally involving shallow wells in overlooked areas of established oil and gas fields. This will substantially reduce competition and will likely eliminate any completion from major oil and natural gas exploration companies.

Patents, Trademarks, and Licenses

The Company has not applied for any patents or trademarks and does not intend to do so in the foreseeable future.

Government Regulation

The Company's operations are and will be affected by extensive regulation by various federal, state and local laws and regulations relating to the exploration and possible development, production, gathering and marketing of oil and gas. Matters subject to regulation include discharge permits for drilling operations, drilling and abandonment bonds or other financial responsibility requirements, reports concerning operations, wells, unitization and pooling of properties, and taxation. From time to time, regulatory agencies have imposed price controls and limitations on production by restricting the rate of flow of oil and gas wells below actual production capacity in order to conserve supplies of oil and gas. The Company anticipates the main federal, state and local laws, rules and regulations which will apply to its planned exploration and operation activities will be mainly environmental and regulatory relating to oil spills, contamination of aquifers and streams, use of hazardous materials, trash accumulation and disposal and surface damage.

Environmental Laws

Operations of the Company are also subject to numerous environmental laws, including, but not limited to, those governing management of waste, protection of water, air quality, the discharge of materials into the environment, and preservation of natural resources. Non-compliance with environmental laws and the discharge of oil, gas, or other materials into the air, soil or water may give rise to liabilities to the government and third parties, including civil and criminal penalties, and may require the Company to incur costs to remedy the discharge. Laws and regulations protecting the environment have become more stringent in recent years, and may in certain circumstances impose retroactive, strict, and joint and several liability rendering entities liable for environmental

7

damage without regard to negligence or fault. From time-to-time the Company may have to agree to indemnify sellers of producing properties, from whom the Company has acquired reserves, against certain liabilities for environmental claims associated with such properties. There can be no assurance that new laws or regulations, or modifications of or new interpretations of existing laws and regulations, will not increase substantially the cost of compliance or otherwise adversely affect the Company's operations and financial condition or that material indemnity claims will not arise against the Company with respect to properties acquired by or from the Company. While the Company does not anticipate incurring material costs in connection with environmental compliance and remediation, it cannot guarantee that material costs will not be incurred. The Company estimates that any costs of complying with environmental laws, rules and regulations will mainly be associated with short delays and minimal costs in time and labor. Some of the most significant environmental regulations which will affect the Company's proposed operations will be avoiding archeological sites, avoiding damage to grasslands and avoiding oil spills.

WHERE YOU CAN GET ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

The public may read and copy any materials filed with the SEC at the SEC's Public Reference Room at 450 Fifth Street NW, Washington, D.C. 20549. The public may also obtain information on the operation of the Public Reference Room by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. The SEC maintains an Internet site that contains reports, proxy and information statements, and other information regarding issuers that file electronically with the SEC. The address of that site is http://www.sec.gov.

ITEM 1A.   

RISK FACTORS

We are a smaller reporting company as defined by Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and are not required to provide the information under this item.

ITEM 1B.   

UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS

None.

ITEM 2.      

PROPERTIES

Our corporate office is located at 4601 N. Highway 279, Brownwood, Texas 76801.  Our telephone number is (325) 752-6222. The Company does not presently own any interests in real estate.

As of the dates specified in the following table, the Company held the following property in the following amounts:

The Company defines cash equivalents as all highly liquid investments with a maturity of 3 months or less when purchased.

8

Proven Reserves:  The oil & gas leases acquired in 2010 have a number of existing wells, many of which were shut-in.  We are in the process of re-working these existing wells.  All of these leases are in Texas.  At this time, we do not have proven developed or undeveloped reserve estimates for these leases, but plan to have proven reserve estimates made in 2011.

Products Sold:  The Company has sold $52,440 worth of oil & gas products during the last three fiscal years.

Drilling Activities:  No exploratory or development wells have been drilled by the Company during the last three fiscal years.  

Present Activities:  The Company has no wells in the process of being drilled.  Several of the Company’s existing wells are in the process of being re-worked.

Delivery Commitments:  The Company has no commitments to provide a fixed and determinable quantity of oil or gas in the near future under existing contracts or arrangements.

Oil & Gas Properties, Wells, Operations and Acreage:  The following table shows the number of wells and acres as of December 31, 2010.

“Gross” means the Company owns an interest.  “Net” is the fractional ownership based on the percentage of the working interest owned by the Company.  In this case, the Company owns 100% of the working interest so the “gross” and “net” are the same.  “Productive” means a producing well or a well mechanically capable of production.  “Developed Acreage” is based on the legal well spacing for productive wells.  “Undeveloped Acreage” is based on leased acres on which wells have not been drilled or completed to a point that would permit the production of economic quantities of oil or gas.   None of the wells have multiple completions.

Lease Terms:  The Panther Creek lease is held by production into the tank farm.  The Byler Lease requires that production from an existing well bore commence by April 14, 2010 (production into the tank farm began in early April 2010 and the lease is now held by production).  The Mud Creek lease requires that production from re-entering a plugged well or drilling a new well commence by April 1, 2011.  The Hutchins lease requires that production from drilling a new well commence by December 31, 2010.

ITEM 3.      

LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

We know of no material, existing or pending legal proceedings against our company, nor are we involved as a plaintiff in any material proceeding or pending litigation. There are no proceedings in which our director, officer or any affiliates, or any registered or beneficial shareholder, is an adverse party or has a material interest adverse to our interest.

ITEM 4.     

[REMOVED AND RESERVED]

ITEM 5.

MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

Common Stock

On October 12, 2010, the Company's common stock was approved by FINRA for trading on the OTC Bulletin Board (“OTCBB”), and began trading on the OTCBB on October 12, 2010 under the symbol FEGR.OB. Prior to October 12, 2010, our stock was traded on the Pink Sheets under the symbol “FEGR.PK”.  Because we are

9

quoted on OTC Bulletin Board, our securities may be less liquid, receive less coverage by security analysts and news media, and generate lower prices than might otherwise be obtained if they were listed on a national securities exchange. The reported high and low bid and ask prices for the common stock are shown below for the period from January 1, 2009 through December 31, 2010. 

(1)

Our stock was traded on the Pink Sheets under the symbol “FEGR.PK” until October 12, 2010.

As of December 31, 2010, an aggregate of 70,238,790 shares of our common stock were issued and outstanding and were owned by approximately 580 holders of record, based on information provided by our transfer agent.

Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities

During the year ended December 31, 2010, we did not issue any unregistered securities other than as previously disclosed.

Dividends

We have not paid any cash dividends on our common stock since inception and presently anticipate that all earnings, if any, will be retained for development of our business and that no dividends on our common stock will be declared in the foreseeable future. Any future dividends will be subject to the discretion of our Board of Directors and will depend upon, among other things, future earnings, operating and financial condition, capital requirements, general business conditions and other pertinent facts. Therefore, there can be no assurance that any dividends on our common stock will be paid in the future.

Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

On March 31, 2010, the Company entered into a Stock Repurchase Agreement (the "Agreements") with each of Douglas B. Tallant, our CEO and President, Donald L. Trapp, our CFO and Secretary, and Merus Energy Corp. ("Merus"), a company controlled by Sean Tallant, the son of our CEO (collectively, the "Parties"). Per the terms of the Agreements, the Company shall re-purchase certain shares of preferred stock previously issued to each of the Parties in exchange for newly issued Promissory Notes.

In exchange for 350,000 shares of the Company’s preferred shares (per the terms of the Stock Repurchase Agreement), the Company issued a promissory note to Douglas B. Tallant. The promissory note is in the principal amount of $35,000 and bears interest at 8% per annum. The promissory note is due on April 1, 2011.  

In exchange for 950,000 shares of the Company’s preferred shares (per the terms of the Stock Repurchase Agreement), the Company issued a promissory note to Donald L. Trapp. The promissory note is in the principal amount of $106,000 and bears interest at 8% per annum. The promissory note is due on April 1, 2011.  

10

In exchange for 2,900,000 shares of the Company’s preferred shares (per the terms of the Stock Repurchase Agreement), the Company issued a promissory note to Merus. The promissory note is in the principal amount of $301,000 and bears interest at 8% per annum. The promissory note is due on April 1, 2011.  

ITEM 6.   

SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

We are a smaller reporting company as defined by Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and are not required to provide the information under this item.

ITEM 7.  

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

This Annual Report on Form 10-K contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”) and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). These forward-looking statements are not historical facts but rather are based on current expectations, estimates and projections. We may use words such as “anticipate,” “expect,” “intend,” “plan,” “believe,” “foresee,” “estimate” and variations of these words and similar expressions to identify forward-looking statements. These statements are not guarantees of future performance and are subject to certain risks, uncertainties and other factors, some of which are beyond our control, are difficult to predict and could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed or forecasted. You should read this report completely and with the understanding that actual future results may be materially different from what we expect. The forward looking statements included in this report are made as of the date of this report and should be evaluated with consideration of any changes occurring after the date of this Report. We will not update forward-looking statements even though our situation may change in the future and we assume no obligation to update any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.

Cash Requirements

Our cash on hand as of December 31, 2010 is -$1,814. We do not have sufficient cash on hand to pay the costs of our operations as projected to twelve (12) months or less or to fund our operations for that same period of time. We will require additional financing in order to proceed with some or all of our goals as projected over the next twelve (12) months. We presently do not have any arrangements for additional financing, and no potential lines of credit or sources of financing are currently available for the purpose of proceeding with any of our goals projected over the next twelve (12) months and beyond.

Any additional growth of the Company will require additional cash infusions. We may face expenses or other circumstances such that we will have additional financing requirements. In such event, the amount of additional capital we may need to raise will depend on a number of factors. These factors primarily include the extent to which we can achieve revenue growth, the profitability of such revenues, operating expenses, research and development expenses, and capital expenditures. Given the number of programs that we have ongoing and not complete, it is not possible to predict the extent or cost of these additional financing requirements.

Notwithstanding the numerous factors that our cash requirements depend on, and the uncertainties associated with each of the major revenue opportunities that we have, we believe that our plan of operation can build long-term value if we are able to demonstrate clear progress toward our objectives.

Progress in the development of our business plan will likely lend credibility to our plan to achieve profitability.

The failure to secure any necessary outside funding could have an adverse affect on our development and results there from and a corresponding negative impact on shareholder liquidity.

Results of Operations

We realized $52,440 in revenue from operations during 2010 from the oil and gas zones underlying our five leases in Central Texas.  During the year ended December 31, 2010, the loss from operations is $879,328 (2009

11

- $783,179). This increase in loss was due primarily to the bad debt expense for the notes that were written off and to oil well operations costs for reworking oil wells of the Central Texas leases and for upgrading and repairing infrastructure on the leases. From February 11, 2005 (inception of oil and gas exploration operations) to December 31, 2010, the Company has incurred cumulative net operating losses of $3,677,520.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

As at December 31, 2010, we had total assets of $205,036, compared to $86,006 as at December 31, 2009.  The increase in total assets is attributed to acquisition of oil and gas leases of $67,500 as well as capitalization of oil field equipment of $67,392.

As at December 31, 2010, we had total liabilities of $2,944,363, compared to $1,588,281 as at December 31, 2009.  The increase in total liabilities is attributed to $180,000 in salaries payable to directors and officers of the Company, an increase in accounts payable and accrued liabilities of $56,478, issuances of loans payable of $814,113, and an increase in amounts owing to related parties of $186,523.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We have no significant off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on our financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources that are material to stockholders.

Contractual Obligations

We are a smaller reporting company as defined by Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and are not required to provide the information under this item.

Going Concern

We have not attained profitable operations and are dependent upon obtaining financing to pursue any extensive acquisitions and activities. For these reasons, our auditors stated in their report on our audited financial statements that they have substantial doubt that we will be able to continue as a going concern without further financing.

Future Financings

We will continue to rely on equity sales of our common shares in order to continue to fund our business operations. Issuances of additional shares will result in dilution to existing stockholders. There is no assurance that we will achieve any additional sales of the equity securities or arrange for debt or other financing to fund planned acquisitions and exploration activities.

Critical Accounting Policies

Our financial statements and accompanying notes have been prepared in accordance with United States generally accepted accounting principles applied on a consistent basis. The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods.

We regularly evaluate the accounting policies and estimates that we use to prepare our financial statements. A complete summary of these policies is included in Note 2 of the notes to our financial statements. In general, management's estimates are based on historical experience, on information from third party professionals, and on various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the facts and circumstances. Actual results could differ from those estimates made by management.

12

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

In May 2010, the FASB (Financial Accounting Standards Board) issued Accounting Standards Update 2010-19 (ASU 2010-19), Foreign Currency (Topic 830): Foreign Currency Issues: Multiple Foreign Currency Exchange Rates.  The amendments in this Update are effective as of the announcement date of March 18, 2010.  The Company does not expect the provisions of ASU 2010-19 to have any effect on the Company’s reported financial position or results of operations.  

In April 2010, the FASB issued ASU No. 2010-17, "Revenue Recognition - Milestone Method (Topic 605): Milestone Method of Revenue Recognition" (codified within ASC 605 - Revenue Recognition).  ASU 2010-17 provides guidance on defining a milestone and determining when it may be appropriate to apply the milestone method of revenue recognition for research or development transactions.  ASU 2010-17 is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after June 15, 2010.  The adoption of this statement had no effect on the Company’s reported financial position or results of operations.

In March 2010, the FASB issued ASU No. 2010-11, "Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815): Scope Exception Related to Embedded Credit Derivatives" (codified within ASC 815 - Derivatives and Hedging).  ASU 2010-11 improves disclosures originally required under SFAS No. 161.  ASU 2010-11 is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after June 15, 2010.  The adoption of this statement had no effect on the Company’s reported financial position or results of operations.

In February 2010, the FASB Accounting Standards Update 2010-10 (ASU 2010-10), “Consolidation (Topic 810): Amendments for Certain Investment Funds.”  The amendments in this Update are effective as of the beginning of a reporting entity’s first annual period that begins after November 15, 2009 and for interim periods within that first reporting period. Early application is not permitted.  The Company’s adoption of provisions of ASU 2010-10 did not have a material effect on the financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

In February 2010, the FASB issued ASU No. 2010-09 “Subsequent Events (ASC Topic 855) “Amendments to Certain Recognition and Disclosure Requirements” (“ASU No. 2010-09”). ASU No. 2010-09 requires an entity that is an SEC filer to evaluate subsequent events through the date that the financial statements are issued and removes the requirement for an SEC filer to disclose a date, in both issued and revised financial statements, through which the filer had evaluated subsequent events. The adoption did not have an impact on the Company’s financial position and results of operations.

In January 2010, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2010-06, “Improving Disclosures about Fair Value Measurements.” ASU No. 2010-06 amends FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 820 and clarifies and provides additional disclosure requirements related to recurring and non-recurring fair value measurements and employers’ disclosures about postretirement benefit plan assets. This ASU is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2009. The adoption of ASU 2010-06 did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial statements.

In January 2010, the FASB issued an amendment to ASC 505, Equity, where entities that declare dividends to shareholders that may be paid in cash or shares at the election of the shareholders are considered to be a share issuance that is reflected prospectively in EPS, and is not accounted for as a stock dividend.  This standard is effective for interim and annual periods ending on or after December 15, 2009 and is to be applied on a retrospective basis.  The adoption of this standard is not expected to have a significant impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.  

In January 2010, the FASB issued an amendment to ASC 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosure, to require reporting entities to separately disclose the amounts and business rationale for significant transfers in and out of Level 1 and Level 2 fair value measurements and separately present information regarding purchase, sale, issuance, and settlement of Level 3 fair value measures on a gross basis.  This standard, for which the Company is currently assessing the impact, is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2009 with the exception of disclosures regarding the purchase, sale, issuance, and settlement of Level 3 fair value measures which are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2010.  The adoption of this standard is not expected to have a significant impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.  

13

In October 2009, FASB issued an amendment to the accounting standards related to the accounting for revenue in arrangements with multiple deliverables including how the arrangement consideration is allocated among delivered and undelivered items of the arrangement. Among the amendments, this standard eliminated the use of the residual method for allocating arrangement considerations and requires an entity to allocate the overall consideration to each deliverable based on an estimated selling price of each individual deliverable in the arrangement in the absence of having vendor-specific objective evidence or other third party evidence of fair value of the undelivered items. This standard also provides further guidance on how to determine a separate unit of accounting in a multiple-deliverable revenue arrangement and expands the disclosure requirements about the judgments made in applying the estimated selling price method and how those judgments affect the timing or amount of revenue recognition. This standard, for which the Company is currently assessing the impact, will become effective on January 1, 2011.

In October 2009, the FASB issued an amendment to the accounting standards related to certain revenue arrangements that include software elements. This standard clarifies the existing accounting guidance such that tangible products that contain both software and non-software components that function together to deliver the product’s essential functionality, shall be excluded from the scope of the software revenue recognition accounting standards. Accordingly, sales of these products may fall within the scope of other revenue recognition standards or may now be within the scope of this standard and may require an allocation of the arrangement consideration for each element of the arrangement. This standard, for which the Company is currently assessing the impact, will become effective on January 1, 2011.

In August 2009, FASB issued an amendment to the accounting standards related to the measurement of liabilities that are recognized or disclosed at fair value on a recurring basis. This standard clarifies how a company should measure the fair value of liabilities and that restrictions preventing the transfer of a liability should not be considered as a factor in the measurement of liabilities within the scope of this standard. This standard is effective for the Company on October 1, 2009. The adoption of this amendment did not have a material effect on the Company’s financial statements.

In June 2009, the FASB issued guidance now codified as FASB ASC Topic 105, Generally Accepted Accounting Principles, as the single source of authoritative accounting principles recognized by the FASB to be applied by nongovernmental entities in the preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP, aside from those issued by the SEC. ASC 105 does not change current U.S. GAAP, but is intended to simplify user access to all authoritative U.S. GAAP by providing all authoritative literature related to a particular topic in one place. The adoption of ASC 105 did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements, but did eliminate all references to pre-codification standards.

In May 2009, FASB issued ASC 855, Subsequent Events, which establishes general standards of for the evaluation, recognition and disclosure of events and transactions that occur after the balance sheet date. Although there is new terminology, the standard is based on the same principles as those that currently exist in the auditing standards. The standard, which includes a new required disclosure of the date through which an entity has evaluated subsequent events, is effective for interim or annual periods ending after June 15, 2009. The adoption of ASC 855-10 did not have a material effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements. Refer to Note 5.

The Company has implemented all new accounting pronouncements that are in effect. These pronouncements did not have any material impact on the financial statements unless otherwise disclosed, and the Company does not believe that there are any other new accounting pronouncements that have been issued that might have a material impact on its financial position or results of operations.

ITEM 7A.   

QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

We are a smaller reporting company as defined by Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and are not required to provide the information under this item.

14

ITEM 8.   

Friendly Energy Exploration

 (An Exploration Stage Company)

December 31, 2010

Index

F-1

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

F-2

Balance Sheet

F-3

Statement of Operations

F-4

Statement of Stockholders’ Deficit

F-5

Statement of Cash Flows

 F-6

Notes to the Financial Statements

F-7

F-1

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To:  The Board of Directors and Shareholders

Friendly Energy Exploration

502 North Division Street

Carson City, Nevada  92684

I have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of Friendly Energy Exploration as of December 31, 2010 and 2009 and the related consolidated statements of operations and of cash flows for the years then ended, and I have audited the period from inception of the development stage (January 7, 1993) through February 10, 2005 and the period from inception of the exploration stage (February 11, 2005) through December 31, 2010. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management.  My responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on my audit.

I conducted my audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States).  Those standards require that I plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement.  An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements.  An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.  I believe that my audit provides a reasonable basis for my opinion.

In my opinion, based on my audit, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Friendly Energy Exploration as of December 31, 2010 and 2009, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, and the period from inception of the development stage (January 7, 1993) through February 10. 2005 and the period from inception of the exploration stage (February 11, 2005) through December 31, 2010, in conformity with United States generally accepted accounting principles.

The accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern.  As discussed in Note 2 to the financial statements, the Company has suffered recurring losses.  This raises substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.  Management’s plans in regard to these matters are also described in Note 2.  The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

The Company has determined that it is not required to have, nor was I engaged to perform, an audit of the effectiveness of its documented internal controls over financial reporting.

/ s /

John Kinross-Kennedy

Certified Public Accountant

Irvine, California

April 5, 2011

F-2

FRIENDLY ENERGY EXPLORATION

(An Exploration Stage Company)

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET

F-3

FRIENDLY ENERGY EXPLORATION

(An Exploration Stage Company)

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

F-6

FRIENDLY ENERGY EXPLORATION

 (AN EXPLORATION STAGE COMPANY)

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - 2010

1.

DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS AND HISTORY

Friendly Energy Corp., a Nevada corporation, (hereinafter referred to as the “Company” or “Friendly Energy”) was incorporated in the State of Nevada on January 7, 1993 under the name Eco-Systems Marketing.  The company was originally in the business of selling electric power and related services to small and medium sized businesses in a newly deregulated California market.  The Company is now in the business of oil and gas exploration and operations.  In 2009, the Company acquired four oil and gas leases in central Texas totaling 1,036 acres with twenty-five wells.  In the first quarter of 2010, the Company acquired a fifth oil and gas lease in Central Texas totally 1,000 acres with twenty-four wells  

The Company is considered an exploration stage company in accordance with by Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 915, Development Stage Entities.  The Company entered the oil and gas exploration business in February 2005, so the cumulative columns in the financial statements include activities for the development stage prior to February 2005 and for the exploration stage beginning February 2005.

On March 9, 2000, the Company formed a wholly owned subsidiary named Friendly Energy Services, Inc.  All oil and gas activities are conducted through this subsidiary except for work over and drilling operations.  On March 3, 2010, the Company formed a wholly owned subsidiary named Friendly Energy Drilling, Inc.  All work over and drilling operations are conducted through this subsidiary.

2.

SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

The ability of the Company to continue as a going concern is dependent on additional sources of capital and the success of the Company’s plan.  The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might be necessary if the Company is unable to continue as a going concern.

Year end – The Company’s yearend is December 31.

Principles of consolidation – The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its subsidiaries.  All significant intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated.

Use of estimates – The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting period.  Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Oil and Gas Properties – The Company utilizes the full-cost method of accounting for petroleum and natural gas properties. Under this method, the Company capitalizes all costs associated with acquisition, exploration and development of oil and natural gas reserves, including leasehold acquisition costs, geological and geophysical expenditures, lease rentals on undeveloped properties and costs of drilling of productive and non-productive wells into the full cost pool on a country by country basis. When the Company obtains proven oil and gas reserves, capitalized costs, including estimated future costs to develop the reserves proved and estimated abandonment costs, net of salvage, will be depleted on the units-of-production method using estimates of proved reserves. The costs of unproved properties are not amortized until it is determined whether or not proved reserves can be assigned to the properties. Until such determination is made the Company assesses annually

F-7

whether impairment has occurred, and includes in the amortization base drilling exploratory dry holes associated with unproved properties.

The Company applies a ceiling test to the capitalized cost in the full cost pool. The ceiling test limits such cost to the estimated present value, using a ten percent discount rate, of the future net revenue from proved reserves, based on current economic and operating conditions. Specifically, the Company computes the ceiling test so that capitalized cost, less accumulated depletion and related deferred income tax, do not exceed an amount (the ceiling) equal to the sum of: (A) The present value of estimated future net revenue computed by applying current prices of oil and gas reserves (with consideration of price changes only to the extent provided by contractual arrangements) to estimated future production of proved oil and gas reserves as of the date of the latest balance sheet presented, less estimated future expenditures (based on current cost) to be incurred in developing and producing the proved reserves computed using a discount factor of ten percent and assuming continuation of existing economic conditions; plus (B) the cost of property not being amortized; plus (C) the lower of cost or estimated fair value of unproven properties included in the costs being amortized; less (D) income tax effects related to differences between the book and tax basis of the property.

For unproven properties, the Company excludes from capitalized costs subject to depletion, all costs directly associated with the acquisition and evaluation of the unproved property until it is determined whether or not proved reserves can be assigned to the property. Until such a determination is made, the Company assesses the property at least annually to ascertain whether impairment has occurred. In assessing impairment the Company considers factors such as historical experience and other data such as primary lease terms of the property, average holding periods of unproved property, and geographic and geologic data. The Company adds the amount of impairment assessed to the cost to be amortized subject to the ceiling test.

Asset Retirement Obligations – The Company follows the provisions of ASC 410, Asset Retirement and Environmental Obligations, which establishes standards for the initial measurement and subsequent accounting for obligations associated with the sale, abandonment or other disposal of long-lived tangible assets arising from the acquisition, construction or development and for normal operations of such assets.

Property and equipment – Property and equipment are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation.  Depreciation is provided principally on the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets, which are generally 3 to 27 years.  The amounts of depreciation provided are sufficient to charge the cost of the related assets to operations over their estimated useful lives.  

The Company periodically evaluates whether events and circumstances have occurred that may warrant revision of the estimated useful life of fixed assets or whether the remaining balance of fixed assets should be evaluated for possible impairment. The Company uses an estimate of the related undiscounted cash flows over the remaining life of the fixed assets in measuring their recoverability.

Income taxes – Potential benefits of income tax losses are not recognized in the accounts until realization is more likely than not. The Company has adopted ASC 740, Accounting for Income Taxes, as of its inception. Pursuant to ASC 740, the Company is required to compute tax asset benefits for net operating losses carried forward. The potential benefits of net operating losses have not been recognized in these financial statements because the Company cannot be assured it is more likely than not it will utilize the net operating losses carried forward in future years.

Net loss per common share – The Company computes net income (loss) per share in accordance with ASC 260, Earning per Share.  ASC 260 requires presentation of both basic and diluted earnings per share (EPS) on the face of the income statement. Basic EPS is computed by dividing net income (loss) available to common shareholders (numerator) by the weighted average number of shares outstanding (denominator) during the period. Diluted EPS gives effect to all dilutive potential common shares outstanding during the period using the treasury stock method and convertible preferred stock using the if-converted method. In computing Diluted EPS, the average stock price for the period is used in determining the number of shares assumed to be purchased from the exercise of stock options or warrants. Diluted EPS excludes all dilutive potential shares if their effect is anti dilutive.

Stock-Based Compensation – The Company records stock-based compensation in accordance with ASC 718, Share-Based Payments, using the fair value method. All transactions in which goods or services are the

F-8

consideration received for the issuance of equity instruments are accounted for based on the fair value of the consideration received or the fair value of the equity instrument issued, whichever is more reliably measurable. Equity instruments issued to employees and the cost of the services received as consideration are measured and recognized based on the fair value of the equity instruments issued.

Concentration of risk – A significant amount of the Company’s assets and resources are currently dependent on the financial support of Douglas Tallant and Donald Trapp.  Should they determine to no longer finance the operations of the company before new capital is raised, it may be unlikely for the company to continue.

Revenue recognition – The Company has had revenues of $68,734 to date from its operations.  Revenue is recognized as it is received.

Financial Instruments – Pursuant to ASC 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures and ASC 825, Financial Instruments, an entity is required to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. ASC 820 and 825 establishes a fair value hierarchy based on the level of independent, objective evidence surrounding the inputs used to measure fair value. A financial instrument’s categorization within the fair value hierarchy is based upon the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. ASC 820 and 825 prioritizes the inputs into three levels that may be used to measure fair value:

Level 1

Level 1 applies to assets or liabilities for which there are quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.

Level 2

Level 2 applies to assets or liabilities for which there are inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets; quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in markets with insufficient volume or infrequent transactions (less active markets); or model-derived valuations in which significant inputs are observable or can be derived principally from, or corroborated by, observable market data.

Level 3

Level 3 applies to assets or liabilities for which there are unobservable inputs to the valuation methodology that are significant to the measurement of the fair value of the assets or liabilities.

The Company’s financial instruments consist principally of cash, notes receivable, investment, accounts payable, payroll tax liabilities, judgment payable, deferred salaries, interest payable, loans payables, and amounts due to related parties.   Pursuant to ASC 820 and 825, the fair value of cash is determined based on “Level 1” inputs, which consist of quoted prices in active markets for identical assets. The recorded values of all other financial instruments approximate their current fair values because of their nature and respective maturity dates or durations.

Recent accounting pronouncements

In May 2010, the FASB (Financial Accounting Standards Board) issued Accounting Standards Update 2010-19 (ASU 2010-19), Foreign Currency (Topic 830): Foreign Currency Issues: Multiple Foreign Currency Exchange Rates.  The amendments in this Update are effective as of the announcement date of March 18, 2010.  The Company does not expect the provisions of ASU 2010-19 to have any effect on the Company’s reported financial position or results of operations.  

In April 2010, the FASB issued ASU No. 2010-17, "Revenue Recognition - Milestone Method (Topic 605): Milestone Method of Revenue Recognition" (codified within ASC 605 - Revenue Recognition).  ASU 2010-17 provides guidance on defining a milestone and determining when it may be appropriate to apply the milestone method of revenue recognition for research or development transactions.  ASU 2010-17 is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after June 15, 2010.  The adoption of this statement had no effect on the Company’s reported financial position or results of operations.

F-9

In March 2010, the FASB issued ASU No. 2010-11, "Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815): Scope Exception Related to Embedded Credit Derivatives" (codified within ASC 815 - Derivatives and Hedging).  ASU 2010-11 improves disclosures originally required under SFAS No. 161.  ASU 2010-11 is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after June 15, 2010.  The adoption of this statement had no effect on the Company’s reported financial position or results of operations.

In February 2010, the FASB Accounting Standards Update 2010-10 (ASU 2010-10), “Consolidation (Topic 810): Amendments for Certain Investment Funds.”  The amendments in this Update are effective as of the beginning of a reporting entity’s first annual period that begins after November 15, 2009 and for interim periods within that first reporting period. Early application is not permitted.  The Company’s adoption of provisions of ASU 2010-10 did not have a material effect on the financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

In February 2010, the FASB issued ASU No. 2010-09 “Subsequent Events (ASC Topic 855) “Amendments to Certain Recognition and Disclosure Requirements” (“ASU No. 2010-09”). ASU No. 2010-09 requires an entity that is an SEC filer to evaluate subsequent events through the date that the financial statements are issued and removes the requirement for an SEC filer to disclose a date, in both issued and revised financial statements, through which the filer had evaluated subsequent events. The adoption did not have an impact on the Company’s financial position and results of operations.

In January 2010, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2010-06, “Improving Disclosures about Fair Value Measurements.” ASU No. 2010-06 amends FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 820 and clarifies and provides additional disclosure requirements related to recurring and non-recurring fair value measurements and employers’ disclosures about postretirement benefit plan assets. This ASU is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2009. The adoption of ASU 2010-06 did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial statements.

In January 2010, the FASB issued an amendment to ASC 505, Equity, where entities that declare dividends to shareholders that may be paid in cash or shares at the election of the shareholders are considered to be a share issuance that is reflected prospectively in EPS, and is not accounted for as a stock dividend.  This standard is effective for interim and annual periods ending on or after December 15, 2009 and is to be applied on a retrospective basis.  The adoption of this standard is not expected to have a significant impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.  

In January 2010, the FASB issued an amendment to ASC 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosure, to require reporting entities to separately disclose the amounts and business rationale for significant transfers in and out of Level 1 and Level 2 fair value measurements and separately present information regarding purchase, sale, issuance, and settlement of Level 3 fair value measures on a gross basis.  This standard, for which the Company is currently assessing the impact, is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2009 with the exception of disclosures regarding the purchase, sale, issuance, and settlement of Level 3 fair value measures which are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2010.  The adoption of this standard is not expected to have a significant impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.  

In October 2009, FASB issued an amendment to the accounting standards related to the accounting for revenue in arrangements with multiple deliverables including how the arrangement consideration is allocated among delivered and undelivered items of the arrangement. Among the amendments, this standard eliminated the use of the residual method for allocating arrangement considerations and requires an entity to allocate the overall consideration to each deliverable based on an estimated selling price of each individual deliverable in the arrangement in the absence of having vendor-specific objective evidence or other third party evidence of fair value of the undelivered items. This standard also provides further guidance on how to determine a separate unit of accounting in a multiple-deliverable revenue arrangement and expands the disclosure requirements about the judgments made in applying the estimated selling price method and how those judgments affect the timing or amount of revenue recognition. This standard, for which the Company is currently assessing the impact, will become effective on January 1, 2011.

In October 2009, the FASB issued an amendment to the accounting standards related to certain revenue arrangements that include software elements. This standard clarifies the existing accounting guidance such that tangible products that contain both software and non-software components that function together to deliver the product’s essential functionality, shall be excluded from the scope of the software revenue recognition accounting

F-10

standards. Accordingly, sales of these products may fall within the scope of other revenue recognition standards or may now be within the scope of this standard and may require an allocation of the arrangement consideration for each element of the arrangement. This standard, for which the Company is currently assessing the impact, will become effective on January 1, 2011.

In August 2009, FASB issued an amendment to the accounting standards related to the measurement of liabilities that are recognized or disclosed at fair value on a recurring basis. This standard clarifies how a company should measure the fair value of liabilities and that restrictions preventing the transfer of a liability should not be considered as a factor in the measurement of liabilities within the scope of this standard. This standard is effective for the Company on October 1, 2009. The adoption of this amendment did not have a material effect on the Company’s financial statements.

In June 2009, the FASB issued guidance now codified as FASB ASC Topic 105, Generally Accepted Accounting Principles, as the single source of authoritative accounting principles recognized by the FASB to be applied by nongovernmental entities in the preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP, aside from those issued by the SEC. ASC 105 does not change current U.S. GAAP, but is intended to simplify user access to all authoritative U.S. GAAP by providing all authoritative literature related to a particular topic in one place. The adoption of ASC 105 did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements, but did eliminate all references to pre-codification standards.

In May 2009, FASB issued ASC 855, Subsequent Events, which establishes general standards of for the evaluation, recognition and disclosure of events and transactions that occur after the balance sheet date. Although there is new terminology, the standard is based on the same principles as those that currently exist in the auditing standards. The standard, which includes a new required disclosure of the date through which an entity has evaluated subsequent events, is effective for interim or annual periods ending after June 15, 2009. The adoption of ASC 855-10 did not have a material effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements. Refer to Note 5.

The Company has implemented all new accounting pronouncements that are in effect. These pronouncements did not have any material impact on the financial statements unless otherwise disclosed, and the Company does not believe that there are any other new accounting pronouncements that have been issued that might have a material impact on its financial position or results of operations.

3.

OIL & GAS PROPERTIES

The Panther Lease is reduced by $2,481 in depletion, and the South Thrifty Lease is reduced by $5,385 in depletion.

Byler Lease – In 2009, the Company purchased, through its wholly-owned subsidiary, a 100% interest in oil and gas properties in central Texas for $33,650.  In 2010, there were additional lease costs of $333.  The property totals 372 acres and consists of 17 wells.  The Company remits a 22% royalty payment.  As at December 31,

F-11

2010, there was production on the property from two wells.  Six additional wells are waiting for equipment before production begins.

Hutchins Lease - In 2009, the Company purchased, through its wholly-owned subsidiary, a 100% interest in oil and gas properties in central Texas for $2,400.  The property totals 194 acres.  Upon production, the Company will remit a 15.125% royalty payment.  As at December 31, 2010, there was no production on the property.  

Mud Creek Lease - In 2009, the Company purchased, through its wholly-owned subsidiary, a 100% interest in oil and gas properties in central Texas for $10,000.  The property totals 355 acres.  Upon production, the Company will remit a 22% royalty payment with production expected to commence by July 2010.  As at December 31, 2010, there was no production on the property.    

Panther Creek Lease - In 2009, the Company purchased, through its wholly-owned subsidiary, a 100% interest in oil and gas properties in central Texas for $15,000.  The property totals 155 acres.  The Company remits a 22% royalty payment.  As at December 31, 2010, there was production on the property from four wells.  

South Thrifty Lease - In the first quarter of 2010, the Company purchased, through its wholly-owned subsidiary, a 50% interest in oil and gas properties in central Texas for $67,500.  The property totals 1,000 acres.  The Company remits approximately a 22% royalty payment (the royalty payment varies for the wells).  As at December 31, 2010, there was production on the property from eighteen wells.

4.

PROPERTY & EQUIPMENT

Property and equipment consist of the following as of December 31, 2010 and 2009:

5.

RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

In 2010, the officers agreed with the Company to defer their salaries totaling $240,000, see note 7.

As of December 31, 2010 and 2009, loans payable from related parties consists of the following:

6.

OTHER CURRENT LIABILITIES

The company has accrued for unpaid federal payroll taxes in the amounts of $124,252 and $110,431 for the quarters ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively.  $37,268 is owed from 2000 and 2001 unpaid federal payroll taxes; the Company has filed the payroll taxes with the Internal Revenue Service.  $86,984 is owed for accrued payroll taxes on deferred salaries; the Company has yet to file the payroll tax forms with the Internal Revenue Service or related state taxing authorities.

F-12

The company has accrued deferred salaries owed to three officers in the amount of $1,068,000 and 828,000 for the quarters ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively.  

The company has accrued interest in the amount of $272,528 and $189,366 for the quarters ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively.  The accrued interest includes interest on unpaid payroll taxes and related party loans.

The company increased its borrowings from another company and from a related party in the first quarter of 2010 through the repurchase of preferred shares.  

7.

STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIT

Common Shares:  As of December 31, 2010 and 2009, there were 52,568,790 and 52,568,790 70,238,790 shares of common stock outstanding (restated for 25-for-1 reverse split in March 2008).

a)

On September 25, 2009, the Company issued 1,000,000 shares of common stock for cash at $0.02 per share.

b)

During 2009, 3,000,000 shares of the company’s preferred stock were converted to 30,000,000 shares of common stock.

c)

On June 25, 2010, the Company issued 1,000,000 shares of common stock for cash at $0.0075 per share.

d)

On June 25 2010, the Company issued 500,000 shares of common stock for cash at $0.028 per share.

e)

On July 6, 2010, the Company issued 1,770,000 shares of common stock for services at $0.028 per share.

f)

On November 9, 2010, the Company issued 2,000,000 shares of common stock for services at $0.033 per share.

g)

During 2010, 1,240,000 shares of the company’s preferred stock were converted to 12,400,000 shares of common stock.

Preferred Shares:   Each share of preferred stock is convertible into ten shares of common stock and has voting rights equal to ten shares of common stock.  Holders of preferred stock are entitled to twenty votes for each share of record on all matters to be voted on by shareholders.

As of December 31, 2010 and 2009 there were 3,577,302 and 8,842,302 shares of preferred stock outstanding.

a)

On January 26, 2009, the company issued 200,000 shares of preferred stock to an officer for cash at $0.075 per share.

b)

On July24, 2009, the company issued 2,500,000 shares of preferred stock in stock in satisfaction of debt valued at $0.056 per share.

c)

On November 30, 2009, the company issued 275,000 shares of preferred stock for cash at $0.182 per share.

d)

On December 30, 2009, the company issued 1,200,000 shares of preferred stock in stock in satisfaction of debt valued at $0.21 per share.

e)

On January 29, 2010, the company issued 25,000 shares of preferred stock for cash at $0.20 per share.

f)

On February 16, 2010, the company issued 75,000 shares of preferred stock for cash at $0.20 per share.

g)

On March 31, 2010, the company repurchased 4,200,000 shares of preferred stock for cash at $0.1052 per share.

h)

On December 14, 2010, the company issued 75,000 shares of preferred stock for cash at $0.21 per share.

F-13

During 2010, as noted above in the common shares section, 1,240,000 shares of preferred stock were converted to 12,400,000 shares of common stock.

During 2000, 11,000 shares of preferred stock were cancelled.  As of December 31, 2009 the issue was not completely resolved and the stock agent had not received the returned share certificates.  Therefore the 11,000 shares are still reflected in the preferred stock balance.

8.

STOCK OPTIONS

The Company granted no options under the Company’s Stock Option Plan in 2010. During 2010, stock-based compensation expense of $4,212 was charged to operations for options that vested in 2010.

The following table summarizes stock option plan activities:

Additional information regarding stock options as of December 31, 2010, is as follows:

As of December 31, 2010, the Company had no unrecognized compensation expense relating to unvested options.  

9.

COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

Employment contracts –

Douglas Tallant - The Company entered into an employment agreement with Douglas Tallant effective January 1, 2007.  Pursuant to the terms of the agreement, Mr. Tallant is to be paid an annual salary of $180,000 in consideration of which Mr. Tallant agreed to act as the Company’s President.  The term of the agreement is for an indefinite period, unless otherwise terminated pursuant to the terms of the agreement.

Donald Trapp - The Company entered into an employment agreement with Donald Trapp effective February 1, 2005.  Pursuant to the terms of the agreement, Mr. Trapp is to be paid an annual salary of $60,000 in consideration of which Mr. Trapp agreed to act as the Company’s Corporate Secretary and Treasurer.  The term of the agreement is for an indefinite period, unless otherwise terminated pursuant to the terms of the agreement.  

10.

LITIGATION

In 2005, an employee received a defaulted judgment against the Company concerning the case Bowers v. Friendly Energy Corporation, San Diego Superior Court Case No. 775084.  The default judgment in the principle sum of $434,211.50 was reduced to a principal amount of $110,000, with interest from October 13, 2000.  With accrued interest and less principal paid of $50,000, the balance at December 31, 2010 is $213,250, as reported in the liability section of the balance sheet.

F-14

ITEM 9.

CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL

None.

ITEM 9A.

CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES.

Disclosure Controls and Procedures

We maintain disclosure controls and procedures, as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Exchange Act"), that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission's rules and forms and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

We carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of December 31, 2010. Based on the evaluation of these disclosure controls and procedures, and in light of the material weaknesses found in our internal controls over financial reporting, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective.

Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(f). The Company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

Under the supervision and with the participation of management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, the Company conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2010 using the criteria established in “Internal Control - Integrated Framework” issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission ("COSO").  

A material weakness is a deficiency, or combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the Company’s annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. In its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2010, the Company determined that there were control deficiencies that constituted material weaknesses, as described below.

Accordingly, the Company concluded that these control deficiencies resulted in a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis by the company’s internal controls.

As a result of the material weaknesses described above, management has concluded that the Company did not maintain effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2010 based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by COSO. 

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

This annual report does not include an attestation report of the Company’s registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting.  Managements report was not subject to attestation by the Company’s registered public accounting firm pursuant to temporary rules of the SEC that permit the Company to provide only management’s report in this annual report.

Continuing Remediation Efforts to address deficiencies in Company’s Internal Control over Financial Reporting

Once the Company is engaged in a business of merit and has sufficient personnel available, then our Board of Directors, in particular and in connection with the aforementioned deficiencies, will establish the following remediation measures:

ITEM 9B.  

OTHER INFORMATION.

None.

30

PART III

ITEM 10.   

DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS.

Identification of Directors and Executive Officers

The following table sets forth the names and ages of our current directors and executive officers:

Term of Office

Each of our officers is elected by the Company’s Board of Directors and their terms of office are at the discretion of the Board.  Our officers serve until the earlier occurrence of the election of his or her successor at the next meeting of stockholders, death, resignation or removal by the Board of Directors.  At the present time, members of the Board of Directors are not compensated for their services to the Board.  

Background and Business Experience

The business experience during the past five years of each of the persons presently listed above as an Officer or Director of the Company is as follows:

Mr. Douglas Tallant - Mr. Tallant is the Company’s President, Chief Executive Officer and is a member of the Board of Directors.  He has years of experience as an owner of several businesses including the largest automobile dealership in Denver and physical therapy clinics in Denver and Oklahoma City.  In addition to being a successful business owner, Mr. Tallant has gained significant executive experience while managing several public companies including Questex, the developer of the original breathalyzer, and Entec, the developer of a toxic water remediation process that was sold to Bechtel Corporation.  Mr. Tallant was appointed as the Company’s Chief Executive Officer, President and a Director due to his extensive experience managing and owning various businesses.  

Mr. Donald Trapp – Mr. Trapp is the Company’s Chief Financial Officer, Secretary and Treasurer and a member of the Board of Directors.  He has a strong educational background in engineering as well as years of practical experience working in the oil and gas industry, buying and selling oil and gas leases, operating two oil wells, and serving as the General Partner of four oil and gas partnerships in New Mexico.  Mr. Trapp has a Bachelor of Science degree in Nuclear Engineering from M.I.T.  In light of Mr. Trapp’s in-depth knowledge and experience in the oil and gas industry, the Board of Directors concluded that it was in the Company’s best interest for him to serve as an officer and director.  

Identification of Significant Employees

We have no significant employees other than Douglas Tallant, our President, Chief Executive Officer and Director, and Donald Trapp, our Chief Financial Officer, Secretary, Treasurer and Director.

Family Relationship

We currently do not have any officers or directors of our Company who are related to each other.   

Involvement in Certain Legal Proceedings

31

Involvement in certain legal proceedings.

During the past ten years no director, executive officer, promoter or control person of the Company has been involved in the following:

(1)

A petition under the Federal bankruptcy laws or any state insolvency law which was filed by or against, or a receiver, fiscal agent or similar officer was appointed by a court for the business or property of such person, or any partnership in which he was a general partner at or within two years before the time of such filing, or any corporation or business association of which he was an executive officer at or within two years before the time of such filing;

(2)

Such person was convicted in a criminal proceeding or is a named subject of a pending criminal proceeding (excluding traffic violations and other minor offenses);

(3)

Such person was the subject of any order, judgment, or decree, not subsequently reversed, suspended or vacated, of any court of competent jurisdiction, permanently or temporarily enjoining him from, or otherwise limiting, the following activities:

i.

Acting as a futures commission merchant, introducing broker, commodity trading advisor, commodity pool operator, floor broker, leverage transaction merchant, any other person regulated by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, or an associated person of any of the foregoing, or as an investment adviser, underwriter, broker or dealer in securities, or as an affiliated person, director or employee of any investment company, bank, savings and loan association or insurance company, or engaging in or continuing any conduct or practice in connection with such activity;

ii.

Engaging in any type of business practice; or

iii.

Engaging in any activity in connection with the purchase or sale of any security or commodity or in connection with any violation of Federal or State securities laws or Federal commodities laws;

(2)

Such person was the subject of any order, judgment or decree, not subsequently reversed, suspended or vacated, of any Federal or State authority barring, suspending or otherwise limiting for more than 60 days the right of such person to engage in any activity described in paragraph (f)(3)(i) of this section, or to be associated with persons engaged in any such activity;

(4)

Such person was found by a court of competent jurisdiction in a civil action or by the Commission to have violated any Federal or State securities law, and the judgment in such civil action or finding by the Commission has not been subsequently reversed, suspended, or vacated;

(3)

Such person was found by a court of competent jurisdiction in a civil action or by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission to have violated any Federal commodities law, and the judgment in such civil action or finding by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission has not been subsequently reversed, suspended or vacated;

(4)

Such person was the subject of, or a party to, any Federal or State judicial or administrative order, judgment, decree, or finding, not subsequently reversed, suspended or vacated, relating to an alleged violation of:

i.

Any Federal or State securities or commodities law or regulation; or

ii.

Any law or regulation respecting financial institutions or insurance companies including, but not limited to, a temporary or permanent injunction, order of disgorgement or restitution, civil money penalty or temporary or permanent cease-and-desist order, or removal or prohibition order; or

iii.

Any law or regulation prohibiting mail or wire fraud or fraud in connection with any business entity; or

32

(5)

Such person was the subject of, or a party to, any sanction or order, not subsequently reversed, suspended or vacated, of any self-regulatory organization (as defined in Section 3(a)(26) of the Exchange Act (15 U.S.C. 78c(a)(26))), any registered entity (as defined in Section 1(a)(29) of the Commodity Exchange Act (7 U.S.C. 1(a)(29))), or any equivalent exchange, association, entity or organization that has disciplinary authority over its members or persons associated with a member.

Audit Committee and Audit Committee Financial Expert

The Company does not have an audit committee or an audit committee financial expert (as defined in Item 407 of Regulation S-K) serving on its Board of Directors. All current members of the Board of Directors lack sufficient financial expertise for overseeing financial reporting responsibilities.  The Company has not yet employed an audit committee financial expert on its Board due to the inability to attract such a person.

The Company intends to establish an audit committee of the board of directors, which will consist of independent directors. The audit committee’s duties will be to recommend to the Company’s board of directors the engagement of an independent registered public accounting firm to audit the Company’s financial statements and to review the Company’s accounting and auditing principles. The audit committee will review the scope, timing and fees for the annual audit and the results of audit examinations performed by the internal auditors and independent registered public accounting firm, including their recommendations to improve the system of accounting and internal controls. The audit committee will at all times be composed exclusively of directors who are, in the opinion of the Company’s board of directors, free from any relationship which would interfere with the exercise of independent judgment as a committee member and who possess an understanding of financial statements and generally accepted accounting principles.

Code of Ethics

Our board of directors has not adopted a code of ethics due to the fact that we presently only have two directors and we are in the development stage of our operations. We anticipate that we will adopt a code of ethics when we increase either the number of our directors and officers or the number of our employees.

Compliance with Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act

Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 requires our directors and executive officers and persons who beneficially own more than ten percent of a registered class of our equity securities to file with the SEC initial reports of ownership and reports of change in ownership of common stock and other equity securities of the Company. Officers, directors and greater than ten percent stockholders are required by SEC regulations to furnish us with copies of all Section 16(a) forms they file. Based solely upon a review of Forms 3 and 4 and amendments thereto furnished to us under Rule 16a-3(e) during the year ended December 31, 2010, Forms 5 and any amendments thereto furnished to us with respect to the year ended December 31, 2010, and the representations made by the reporting persons to us, we believe that during the year ended December 31, 2010, our executive officers and directors and all persons who own more than ten percent of a registered class of our equity securities complied with all Section 16(a) filing requirements.

33

ITEM 11.       

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

The following table sets forth the compensation paid to our executive officers during the twelve month periods ended December 31, 2010 and 2009: 

Summary Compensation Table

Long-Term Incentive Plans

There are no arrangements or plans in which we provide pension, retirement or similar benefits for directors or executive officers.  

Compensation Committee

We currently do not have a compensation committee of the Board of Directors. The Board of Directors as a whole determines executive compensation.

Compensation of Directors

Our directors who are also our employees receive no extra compensation for their service on our Board of Directors.  We do not pay members of the Board of Directors any set fees for attendance at the Board meetings or similar remuneration or reimburse them for any out-of-pocket expenses incurred by them in connection with our business.

Securities Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans

On October 18, 2010, the Company registered on Form S-8, the 2010 Share Incentive Plan, under which the Company is authorized to issue up to fifteen million (15,000,000) shares of the Company’s common stock to the Company’s employees, executives and consultants.

ITEM 12.      

SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT

AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS.

Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners

The following table sets forth certain information concerning the number of shares of our common stock owned beneficially as of March 30, 2011 by: (i) each of our directors; (ii) each of our named executive officers; and (iii) each person or group known by us to beneficially own more than 5% of our outstanding shares of common stock.  Unless otherwise indicated, the shareholders listed below possess sole voting and investment power with respect to the shares they own.

(1)

The number and percentage of shares beneficially owned is determined under rules of the SEC and the information is not necessarily indicative of beneficial ownership for any other purpose. Under such rules, beneficial ownership includes any shares as to which the individual has sole or shared voting power or investment power and also any shares which the individual has the right to acquire within 60 days through the exercise of any

35

stock option or other right. The persons named in the table have sole voting and investment power with respect to all shares of common stock shown as beneficially owned by them, subject to community property laws where applicable and the information contained in the footnotes to this table.

(2)

Based on 72,238,790 issued and outstanding shares of common stock as of March 30, 2011.

(3)

Douglas Tallant is a Director and the Company's President and CEO. His beneficial ownership includes 19,820,673 common shares, as well as options to purchase 1,260,000 common shares that will vest within the next 60 days.

(4)

Donald Trapp is a Director and the Company's CFO, Treasurer and Secretary. His beneficial ownership includes 1,197,002 common shares, as well as options to purchase 640,000 common shares that will vest within the next 60 days.

Changes in Control

There are no present arrangements or pledges of the Company’s securities which may result in a change in control of the Company.

ITEM 13.

CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE.

Related Party Transactions

As at December 31, 2010, the Company owes $210,400 (2009 - $23,877) to directors and officers of the Company.  The amounts are unsecured, due interest at 8% per annum, and due on demand.  

Other than the foregoing transaction, none of the directors or executive officers of the Company, nor any person who owned of record or was known to own beneficially more than 5% of the Company’s outstanding shares of its Common Stock, nor any associate or affiliate of such persons or companies, has any material interest, direct or indirect, in any transaction that has occurred during the past fiscal year, or in any proposed transaction, which has materially affected or will affect the Company.

Director Independence

For purposes of determining director independence, we have applied the definitions set out in NASDAQ Rule 5605(a)(2).  The OTCBB on which shares of Common Stock are quoted does not have any director independence requirements.  The NASDAQ definition of “Independent Officer” means a person other than an Executive Officer or employee of the Company or any other individual having a relationship which, in the opinion of the Company's Board of Directors, would interfere with the exercise of independent judgment in carrying out the responsibilities of a director.  According to the NASDAQ definition, neither Douglas Tallant nor Donald Trapp are independent directors of the Company.

Review, Approval or Ratification of Transactions with Related Persons

We are a smaller reporting company as defined by Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and are not required to provide the information under this item.

ITEM 14.    

PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES.

36

Audit Fees

During the fiscal years ended December 31, 2010, we incurred approximately $4,000 in fees to our principal independent accountants for professional services rendered in connection with the audit and reviews of our financial statements for fiscal years ended December 31, 2010.

During the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009, we incurred approximately $4,000 in fees to our principal independent accountants for professional services rendered in connection with the audit and reviews of our financial statements for fiscal year ended December 31, 2009.

Audit-Related Fees

The aggregate fees billed during the fiscal years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009 for assurance and related services by our principal independent accountants that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of our financial statements (and are not reported under Item 9(e)(1) of Schedule 14A was $0 and $0, respectively.

Tax Fees

The aggregate fees billed during the fiscal years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009 for professional services rendered by our principal accountant tax compliance, tax advice and tax planning were $nil and $nil, respectively.

All Other Fees

The aggregate fees billed during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010 for products and services provided by our principal independent accountants (other than the services reported in Items 9(e)(1) through 9(e)(3) of Schedule 14A was $0 and $0, respectively.

PART IV

ITEM 15.     

EXHIBITS.

(a)

Exhibits.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

FRIENDLY ENERGY EXPLORATION

Dated:  April 5, 2011

/s/ Douglas Tallant

By: Douglas Tallant

Its: President and Principal Executive Officer

Dated:  April 5, 2011

/s/ Donald Trapp

By: Donald Trapp

Its:  Chief Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer

Pursuant to the requirement of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated:

Dated:  April 5, 2011

/s/ Douglas Tallant

Douglas Tallant, Director

Dated:  April 5, 2011

/s/ Donald Trapp

Donald Trapp, Director

38

39