UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D. C. 20549

FORM 10-K

þ		ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

o		TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Commission file number: 000-52891

CORPORATE PROPERTY ASSOCIATES 17 — GLOBAL INCORPORATED

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Maryland		20-8429087
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)		(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
50 Rockefeller Plaza
New York, New York		10020
(Address of principal executive offices)		(Zip code)

Registrant’s telephone numbers, including area code:
Investor Relations (212) 492-8920
(212) 492-1100

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: None

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
Common Stock, Par Value $0.001 Per Share

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes o No þ

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes o No þ

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes o No o

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer o		Accelerated filer o		Non-accelerated filer þ		Smaller reporting company o
				(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes o No þ

Registrant has no active market for its common stock. Non-affiliates held 109,513,611 shares of common stock at June 30, 2010.

As of March 14, 2011, there were 158,445,703 shares of common stock of registrant outstanding.

The registrant incorporates by reference its definitive Proxy Statement with respect to its 2011 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission within 120 days following the end of its fiscal year, into Part III of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

 

 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PART I
Item 1. Business			2
Item 1A. Risk Factors			13
Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments			30
Item 2. Properties			30
Item 3. Legal Proceedings			30
Item 4. Removed and Reserved			30
PART II
Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities			31
Item 6. Selected Financial Data			32
Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations			33
Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk			52
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data			55
Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure			107
Item 9A. Controls and Procedures			107
Item 9B. Other Information			107
PART III
Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance			108
Item 11. Executive Compensation			108
Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters			108
Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence			108
Item 14. Principal Accountant Fees and Services			108
PART IV
Item 15. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules			108
SIGNATURES			111
Exhibit 21.1
Exhibit 31.1
Exhibit 31.2
Exhibit 32

Forward-Looking Statements

This Annual Report on Form 10-K, including Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations in Item 7 of Part II of this Report, contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the federal securities laws. These forward-looking statements generally are identified by the words “believe,” “project,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “estimate,” “intend,” “strategy,” “plan,” “may,” “should,” “will,” “would,” “will be,” “will continue,” “will likely result,” and similar expressions. It is important to note that our actual results could be materially different from those projected in such forward-looking statements. You should exercise caution in relying on forward-looking statements as they involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may materially affect our future results, performance, achievements or transactions. Information on factors which could impact actual results and cause them to differ from what is anticipated in the forward-looking statements contained herein is included in this Report as well as in our other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”), including but not limited to those described in Item 1A. Risk Factors of this Report. We do not undertake to revise or update any forward-looking statements. Additionally, a description of our critical accounting estimates is included in the Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations section of this Report.

CPA^®:17 2010 10-K — 1

PART I

Item 1. Business.

(a) General Development of Business

Overview:

Corporate Property Associates 17 — Global Incorporated (together with its consolidated subsidiaries, “we”, “us” or “our”) is a publicly owned, non-listed real estate investment trust (“REIT”) and was formed as a Maryland corporation in February 2007 for the purpose of investing in a diversified portfolio of income-producing commercial properties and other real estate related assets, both domestically and outside the United States (“U.S.”). As a REIT, we are not subject to U.S. federal income taxation as long as we satisfy certain requirements, principally relating to the nature of our income, the level of our distributions and other factors. We conduct substantially all of our investment activities and own all of our assets through CPA^®:17 Limited Partnership, our operating partnership. We are a general partner and a limited partner and own a 99.985% capital interest in the operating partnership. W. P. Carey Holdings, LLC (“Carey Holdings”), an indirect subsidiary of W. P. Carey & Co. LLC (“WPC”), holds a special general partner interest in the operating partnership.

Our core investment strategy is to acquire, own and manage a portfolio of commercial properties leased to a diversified group of companies on a single tenant net lease basis. Our net leases generally require the tenant to pay substantially all of the costs associated with operating and maintaining the property, such as maintenance, insurance, taxes, structural repairs and other operating expenses. Leases of this type are referred to as triple-net leases. We may also seek to expand our portfolio to include other types of real estate investments as opportunities arise.

We are externally managed by WPC through certain of its wholly-owned subsidiaries (collectively, the “advisor”). WPC is a publicly-traded company listed on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol “WPC.” The advisor provides both strategic and day-to-day management services for us, including capital funding services, investment research and analysis, investment financing and other investment related services, asset management, disposition of assets, investor relations and administrative services. The advisor also provides office space and other facilities for us. We pay asset management fees and certain transactional fees to the advisor and also reimburse the advisor for certain expenses, including broker-dealer commissions the advisor pays on our behalf, marketing costs and personnel provided for administration of our operations. The advisor also currently serves in this capacity for other REITs that it formed under the Corporate Property Associates brand: Corporate Property Associates 14 Incorporated (“CPA^®:14”), Corporate Property Associates 15 Incorporated (“CPA^®:15”) and Corporate Property Associates 16 — Global Incorporated (“CPA^®:16 — Global”), collectively, including us, the “CPA^® REITs.” The advisor also serves as the advisor to Carey Watermark Investors Incorporated (“CWI”), which was formed in March 2008 for the purpose of acquiring interests in lodging and lodging-related properties.

In February 2007, WPC purchased 22,222 shares of our common stock for $0.2 million and was admitted as our initial shareholder. WPC purchased its shares at $9.00 per share, net of commissions and fees that would have otherwise been payable to Carey Financial, LLC (“Carey Financial”), a subsidiary of WPC. In addition, in July 2008, Carey Holdings made a capital contribution to us of $0.3 million.

In November 2007, our registration statement on Form S-11 (File No. 333-140842), covering an initial public offering of up to 200,000,000 shares of common stock at $10.00 per share, was declared effective by the SEC under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”). The registration statement also covers the offering of up to 50,000,000 shares of common stock at $9.50 pursuant to our distribution reinvestment and stock purchase plan. Our shares are initially being offered on a “best efforts” basis by Carey Financial and selected other dealers.

In November 2007, our articles of incorporation were amended to increase the number of shares authorized to 450,000,000 consisting of 400,000,000 shares of common stock, $0.001 par value per share and 50,000,000 shares of preferred stock, $0.001 par value per share.

Our principal executive offices are located at 50 Rockefeller Plaza, New York, NY 10020 and our telephone number is (212) 492-1100. We have no employees. At December 31, 2010, the advisor employed 170 individuals who are available to perform services for us.

CPA^®:17 2010 10-K — 2

Significant Developments during 2010:

Acquisition Activity — During 2010, we completed fifteen investments, including nine domestic investments and six international investments at a total cost of approximately $1.0 billion. This investment activity included an investment with General Parts Inc. and Carquest Canada Ltd (collectively, “CARQUEST”) in North America totaling $259.7 million, two investments in Croatia with Agrokor d.d. (“Agrokor”) totaling $164.8 million and three investments in Spain totaling $189.5 million, comprised of two investments with Eroski Sociedad Cooperativa (“Eroski”) totaling $76.9 million and an investment with Distribuidora de Television Digital S.A. (“Sogecable”) totaling $112.6 million.

Additionally, during 2010, we purchased for $50.1 million a participation in the limited-recourse mortgage loan outstanding related to our New York Times venture, which had a balance of $117.7 million on that date.

Financing Activity — During 2010, we obtained mortgage financing totaling $431.7 million with a weighted average annual interest rate and term of up to 5.93% and 8.8 years, respectively. Additionally, our share of financing obtained by one unconsolidated venture totaled $14.5 million, with an annual interest rate and term of 5.91% and 10 years, respectively.

Public Offering — Since beginning fundraising in December 2007, we have raised more than $1.5 billion through the date of this Report, of which $593.1 million and $160.8 million were raised during 2010 and 2011, respectively.

In October 2010, we filed a registration statement with the SEC for a possible continuous public offering of up to an additional $1.0 billion of common stock, which we currently expect will commence after our initial public offering terminates. We refer to the possible public offering as the “follow-on offering.” There can be no assurance that we will actually commence the follow-on offering or successfully sell the full number of shares registered. Our initial public offering will terminate on the earlier of the date on which the registration statement for the follow-on offering becomes effective or May 2, 2011.

Proposed Asset Purchase — On December 13, 2010, two of our affiliates, CPA^®:14 and CPA^®:16 — Global, entered into a definitive agreement pursuant to which CPA^®:14 will merge with and into a subsidiary of CPA^®:16 — Global (the “Proposed Merger”), subject to the approval of the shareholders of CPA^®:14 and other closing conditions. In connection with the Proposed Merger, we have agreed to purchase three properties from CPA^®:14, for an aggregate purchase price of $57.4 million, plus the assumption of approximately $153.9 million of indebtedness. CPA^®:16 — Global already is a joint venture partner in the properties being sold to us and does not wish to increase its ownership interest in them. This asset sale to us is contingent upon the approval of the Proposed Merger by shareholders of CPA^®:14.

(b) Financial Information About Segments

We operate in one industry segment, real estate ownership, with domestic and foreign investments. Refer to Note 16 in the accompanying consolidated financial statements for financial information about this segment.

(c) Narrative Description of Business

Business Objectives and Strategy

Our objectives are to:

	•		provide attractive risk-adjusted returns for our shareholders;
	•		generate sufficient cash flow over time to provide investors with increasing distributions;
	•		seek investments with potential for capital appreciation; and
	•		use leverage to enhance the returns on our investments.

We seek to achieve these objectives by investing in a portfolio of income-producing commercial properties leased to a diversified group of companies on a net lease basis.

CPA^®:17 2010 10-K — 3

As opportunities arise, we may also seek to expand our portfolio to include other types of real estate investments, such as the following:

	•		equity investments in real properties that are not net leased to a single tenant under long-term leases and may include partially leased properties, multi-tenanted properties, vacant or undeveloped properties and properties subject to short-term net leases, among others;
	•		mortgage loans secured by commercial real properties;
	•		subordinated interests in first mortgage real estate loans, or B Notes;
	•		mezzanine loans related to commercial real estate that are senior to the borrower’s equity position but subordinated to other third-party financing;
	•		commercial mortgage-backed securities (“CMBS”);
	•		equity and debt securities (including preferred equity and other higher-yielding structured debt and equity investments) and other interests issued by entities that are engaged in real-estate related businesses, including real estate funds and other REITs; and
	•		credit-based investments.

We intend our portfolio to be diversified by property type, geography, tenant, and industry. We are not required to meet any diversification standards and have no specific policies or restrictions regarding the geographic areas where we make investments, the industries in which our tenants or borrowers may conduct business or the percentage of our capital that we may invest in a particular asset type.

Our Portfolio

At December 31, 2010, our portfolio was comprised of our full or partial ownership interests in 135 fully-occupied properties, substantially all of which were triple-net leased to 35 tenants, and totaled approximately 15 million square feet (on a pro rata basis). Our portfolio has the following property and lease characteristics:

Geographic Diversification

Information regarding the geographic diversification of our properties at December 31, 2010 is set forth below (dollars in thousands):

		Consolidated Investments								Equity Investments in Real Estate (b)
		Annualized				% of Annualized				Annualized				% of Annualized
		Contractual				Contractual				Contractual				Contractual
		Minimum				Minimum				Minimum				Minimum
Region		Base Rent (a)				Base Rent				Base Rent (a)				Base Rent
United States
East		$	34,211				25	%		$	720				10	%
South			22,819				17				—				—
Midwest			17,607				13				2,710				36
West			12,057				9				—				—
Total U.S.			86,694				64				3,430				46
International
Europe (c)			47,126				35				4,050				54
Canada			1,354				1				—				—
Total		$	135,174				100	%		$	7,480				100	%

CPA^®:17 2010 10-K — 4

Property Diversification

Information regarding our property diversification at December 31, 2010 is set forth below (dollars in thousands):

		Consolidated Investments								Equity Investments in Real Estate (b)
		Annualized				% of Annualized				Annualized				% of Annualized
		Contractual				Contractual				Contractual				Contractual
		Minimum				Minimum				Minimum				Minimum
Property Type		Base Rent (a)				Base Rent				Base Rent (a)				Base Rent
Office		$	50,960				38	%		$	—				—	%
Warehouse/Distribution			37,881				28				4,050				54
Industrial			22,557				16				3,430				46
Retail			20,259				15				—				—
Education			2,495				2				—				—
Other Properties (c)			1,022				1				—				—
Total		$	135,174				100	%		$	7,480				100	%

CPA^®:17 2010 10-K — 5

Tenant Diversification

Information regarding our tenant diversification at December 31, 2010 is set forth below (dollars in thousands):

		Consolidated Investments								Equity Investments in Real Estate (c)
		Annualized				% of Annualized				Annualized				% of Annualized
		Contractual				Contractual				Contractual				Contractual
		Minimum				Minimum				Minimum				Minimum
Tenant Industry (a)		Base Rent (b)				Base Rent				Base Rent (b)				Base Rent
Media: Printing and Publishing		$	33,297				25	%		$	—				—	%
Retail Stores			29,789				22				4,050				54
Beverages, Food, and Tobacco			18,142				13				—				—
Electronics			7,502				6				—				—
Healthcare, Education and Childcare			6,119				4				—				—
Leisure, Amusement, Entertainment			5,887				4				—				—
Consumer Services			5,197				4				—				—
Textiles, Leather, and Apparel			4,718				3				—				—
Business and Commercial Services			4,000				3				—				—
Machine (Manufacturing)			3,883				3				—				—
Banking			3,821				3				—				—
Transportation — Cargo			3,202				2				—				—
Automobile			2,880				2				—				—
Chemicals, Plastics, Rubber, and Glass			2,534				2				3,430				46
Transportation — Personal			2,105				2				—				—
Other (d)			2,098				2				—				—
Total		$	135,174				100	%		$	7,480				100	%

CPA^®:17 2010 10-K — 6

Lease Expirations

At December 31, 2010, lease expirations at our properties were as follows (dollars in thousands):

		Consolidated Investments								Equity Investments in Real Estate (b)
		Annualized				% of Annualized				Annualized				% of Annualized
		Contractual				Contractual				Contractual				Contractual
		Minimum				Minimum				Minimum				Minimum
Year of Lease Expiration		Base Rent (a)				Base Rent				Base Rent (a)				Base Rent
2011-2023		$	3,536				3	%		$	—				—	%
2024			35,414				26				3,333				44
2025-2027			4,710				3				—				—
2028			18,126				13				—				—
2029			10,308				8				—				—
2030			41,418				31				717				10
2031			17,023				13				—				—
2032-2034			4,639				3				3,430				46
Total		$	135,174				100	%		$	7,480				100	%

Asset Management

Our advisor is responsible for all aspects of our operations, including selecting our investments, formulating and evaluating the terms of each proposed acquisition, arranging for the acquisition of the investment, negotiating the terms of borrowings, managing our day-to-day operations and arranging for and negotiating sales of assets. With respect to our net lease investments, asset management functions include restructuring transactions to meet the evolving needs of current tenants, re-leasing properties, refinancing debt, selling assets and utilizing knowledge of the bankruptcy process. The advisor monitors, on an ongoing basis, compliance by tenants with their lease obligations and other factors that could affect the financial performance of any of our properties. Monitoring involves verifying that each tenant has paid real estate taxes, assessments and other expenses relating to the properties it occupies and confirming that appropriate insurance coverage is being maintained by the tenant. For international compliance, the advisor also utilizes third-party asset managers. The advisor reviews financial statements of our tenants and undertakes regular physical inspections of the condition and maintenance of our properties. Additionally, the advisor periodically analyzes each tenant’s financial condition, the industry in which each tenant operates and each tenant’s relative strength in its industry. With respect to other real estate related assets such as mortgage loans, B Notes and mezzanine loans, asset management operations include evaluating potential borrowers’ creditworthiness, operating history and capital structure. With respect to any investments in CMBS or other mortgage related instruments that we may make, the advisor will be responsible for selecting, acquiring and facilitating the acquisition or disposition of such investments, including monitoring the portfolio on an ongoing basis. Our advisor also monitors our portfolio to ensure that investments in equity and debt securities of companies engaged in real estate activities do not require us to register as an “investment company.”

Our board of directors has authorized our advisor to retain one or more subadvisors with expertise in our target asset classes to assist our advisor with investment decisions and asset management. If our advisor retains any subadvisor, our advisor will pay the subadvisor a portion of the fees that it receives from us.

Holding Period

We intend to hold our investments in real property for an extended period depending on the type of investment. We may dispose of other types of investments, such as investments in securities, more frequently. The determination of whether a particular asset should be sold or otherwise disposed of will be made after consideration of relevant factors, including prevailing economic conditions, with a view to achieving maximum capital appreciation for our shareholders or avoiding increases in risk. No assurance can be given that this objective will be realized.

CPA^®:17 2010 10-K — 7

Our intention is to consider alternatives for providing liquidity for our shareholders generally commencing eight years following the investment of substantially all of the net proceeds of our initial public offering. We may provide liquidity for our shareholders through sales of assets, either on a portfolio basis or individually, a listing of our shares on a stock exchange, a merger (which may include a merger with one or more of our affiliated CPA^® REITs and/or with the advisor) or another transaction approved by our board of directors and, if required by law, our shareholders. We are under no obligation to liquidate our portfolio within any particular period since the precise timing will depend on real estate and financial markets, economic conditions of the areas in which the properties are located and tax effects on shareholders that may prevail in the future. Furthermore, there can be no assurance that we will be able to consummate a liquidity event. In the most recent instances in which CPA^® REIT shareholders were provided with liquidity, the liquidating entity merged with another, later-formed CPA^® REIT. In each of these transactions, shareholders of the liquidating entity were offered the opportunity to exchange their shares either for shares of the merged entity or for cash or a short-term note.

Financing Strategies

Our strategy is to borrow, generally, on a non-recourse basis. We will generally borrow in the same currency in which we receive income from the investment or in which we make an investment for which we are seeking financing. This will enable us to mitigate a portion of our currency risk on international investments. We currently estimate that we will borrow, on average, approximately 50%-60% of the value of our investments. Aggregate borrowings on our portfolio as a whole may not exceed, on average, the lesser of 75% of the total costs of all investments or 300% of our net assets unless the excess is approved by a majority of the independent directors and disclosed to shareholders in our next quarterly report, along with the reason for the excess. Net assets are our total assets (other than intangibles), valued at cost before deducting depreciation, reserves for bad debts and other non-cash reserves, less total liabilities.

A lender on non-recourse mortgage debt generally has recourse only to the asset collateralizing such debt and not to any of our other assets, while unsecured financing would give a lender recourse to all of our assets. The use of non-recourse debt, therefore, helps us to limit the exposure of our assets to any one debt obligation. Lenders may, however, have recourse to our other assets in limited circumstances not related to the repayment of the indebtedness, such as under an environmental indemnity or in the case of fraud. Lenders may also seek to include in the terms of mortgage loans change of control provisions making the termination or replacement of the advisor an event of default or an event requiring the immediate repayment of the full outstanding balance of the loan. We will attempt to negotiate loan terms allowing us to replace or terminate the advisor. Even if we are successful in negotiating such provisions, the replacement or termination of the advisor may require the prior written consent of the mortgage lenders.

The advisor may refinance properties or defease a loan when a decline in interest rates makes it profitable to prepay an existing loan, when an existing loan matures or if an attractive investment becomes available and the proceeds from the refinancing can be used to purchase such an investment. The benefits of the refinancing may include an increased cash flow resulting from reduced debt service requirements, an increase in distributions from proceeds of the refinancing, if any, and/or an increase in property ownership if some refinancing proceeds are reinvested in real estate. The prepayment of loans may require us to pay a yield maintenance premium to the lender in order to pay off a loan prior to its maturity.

A majority of our financing requires us to make a lump-sum or “balloon” payment at maturity. At December 31, 2010, scheduled balloon payments for the next five years were as follows (in thousands):

2011		$	—
2012			—
2013			—
2014			105,913	(a)
2015			43,285	(a)

CPA^®:17 2010 10-K — 8

Target Investments

We currently expect that, for at least the first few years of our operations, most of our investments will be long-term net leases. As opportunities arise, we may also seek to expand our portfolio to include other types of real estate investments, as described below.

Real Estate Properties

Long-Term Net Leased Assets

We intend to invest primarily in income-producing properties that are, upon acquisition, improved or being developed or that are to be developed within a reasonable period after acquisition.

Most of our acquisitions will be through long-term net leased assets, many of which are through sale-leaseback transactions, in which we acquire properties from companies that simultaneously lease the properties back from us. These sale-leaseback transactions provide the lessee company with a source of capital that is an alternative to other financing sources such as corporate borrowing, mortgaging real property, or selling shares of common stock.

Our sale-leaseback transactions may occur in conjunction with acquisitions, recapitalizations or other corporate transactions. We may act as one of several sources of financing for these transactions by purchasing real property from the seller and net leasing it back to the seller or its successor in interest (the lessee).

In analyzing potential net lease investment opportunities, the advisor will review all aspects of a transaction, including the creditworthiness of the tenant or borrower and the underlying real estate fundamentals to determine whether a potential acquisition satisfies our acquisition criteria. The advisor may consider the following aspects of each transaction:

Tenant/Borrower Evaluation - The advisor evaluates each potential tenant or borrower for their creditworthiness, typically considering factors such as management experience; industry position and fundamentals; operating history and capital structure, as well as other factors that may be relevant to a particular investment. The advisor seeks opportunities in which it believes the tenant may have a stable or improving credit profile or the credit profile has not been recognized by the market. In evaluating a possible investment, the creditworthiness of a tenant or borrower often is a more significant factor than the value of the underlying real estate, particularly if the underlying property is specifically suited to the needs of the tenant; however, in certain circumstances where the real estate is attractively valued, the creditworthiness of the tenant may be a secondary consideration. Whether a prospective tenant or borrower is creditworthy will be determined by the advisor’s investment department and its investment committee, as described below. Creditworthy does not mean “investment grade.”

Properties Important to Tenant/Borrower Operations — The advisor focuses on properties that it believes are essential or important to the ongoing operations of the tenant. The advisor believes that these properties provide better protection in the event of a bankruptcy, since a tenant/borrower is less likely to risk the loss of a critically important lease or property in a bankruptcy proceeding or otherwise.

Diversification — The advisor attempts to diversify our portfolio to avoid dependence on any one particular tenant, borrower, collateral type, geographic location or tenant/borrower industry. By diversifying our portfolio, the advisor seeks to reduce the adverse effect of a single under-performing investment or a downturn in any particular industry or geographic region.

Lease Terms — Generally, the net leased properties in which we invest are leased on a full recourse basis to our tenants or their affiliates. In addition, the advisor seeks to include a clause in each lease that provides for increases in rent over the term of the lease. These increases are fixed or tied generally to increases in indices such as the Consumer Price Index (“CPI”), or other similar indices in the jurisdiction in which the property is located, but may contain caps or other limitations either on an annual or overall basis. Further, in some jurisdictions (notably Germany), these clauses must provide for rent adjustments based on increases or decreases in the relevant index. In the case of retail stores and hotels, the lease may provide for participation in gross revenues of the tenant at the property above a stated level. Alternatively, a lease may provide for mandated rental increases on specific dates and we may adopt other methods in the future.

Collateral Evaluation — The advisor reviews the physical condition of the property and conducts a market evaluation to determine the likelihood of replacing the rental stream if the tenant defaults or of a sale of the property in such circumstances. The advisor will also generally engage a third-party to conduct, or require the seller to conduct, Phase I or similar environmental site assessments (including a visual inspection for the potential presence of asbestos) in an attempt to identify potential environmental liabilities

CPA^®:17 2010 10-K — 9

associated with a property prior to its acquisition. If potential environmental liabilities are identified, the advisor will generally require that identified environmental issues be resolved by the seller prior to property acquisition or, where such issues cannot be resolved prior to acquisition, require tenants contractually to assume responsibility for resolving identified environmental issues post-closing and provide indemnification protections against any potential claims, losses or expenses arising from such matters. Although the advisor generally relies on its own analysis in determining whether to make an investment, each real property purchased by us will be appraised by an appraiser that is independent of the advisor, prior to acquisition. All independent appraisers must be approved by our independent directors. The contractual purchase price (plus acquisition fees, but excluding acquisition expenses, payable to the advisor) for a real property we acquire will not exceed its appraised value, unless approved by our independent directors. The appraisals may take into consideration, among other things, the terms and conditions of the particular lease transaction, the quality of the lessee’s credit and the conditions of the credit markets at the time the lease transaction is negotiated. The appraised value may be greater than the construction cost or the replacement cost of a property, and the actual sale price of a property if sold by us may be greater or less than the appraised value. In cases of special purpose real estate, a property is examined in light of the prospects for the tenant/borrower’s enterprise and the financial strength and the role of that asset in the context of the tenant/borrower’s overall viability. Operating results of properties and other collateral may be examined to determine whether or not projected income levels are likely to be met.

Transaction Provisions to Enhance and Protect Value — The advisor attempts to include provisions in our leases it believes may help protect our investment from changes in the operating and financial characteristics of a tenant that may affect its ability to satisfy its obligations to us or reduce the value of our investment, such as requiring our consent to specified tenant activity, requiring the tenant to provide indemnification protections, and requiring the tenant to satisfy specific operating tests. The advisor may also seek to enhance the likelihood of a tenant’s lease obligations being satisfied through a guaranty of obligations from the tenant’s corporate parent or other entity or a letter of credit. This credit enhancement, if obtained, provides us with additional financial security. However, in markets where competition for net lease transactions is strong, some or all of these provisions may be difficult to negotiate. In addition, in some circumstances, tenants may require a right to purchase the property leased by the tenant. The option purchase price is generally the greater of the contract purchase price and the fair market value of the property at the time the option is exercised.

Other Equity Enhancements — The advisor may attempt to obtain equity enhancements in connection with transactions. These equity enhancements may involve warrants exercisable at a future time to purchase stock of the tenant or borrower or their parent. If warrants are obtained, and become exercisable, and if the value of the stock subsequently exceeds the exercise price of the warrant, equity enhancements can help us to achieve our goal of increasing investor returns.

Real Estate Related Assets

Opportunistic Investments

There may be opportunities to purchase non-long-term net leased real estate assets from corporations and other owners due to our market presence in the corporate real estate market-place. These may include short-term net leases, vacant property, land, multi-tenanted property, non-commercial property and property leased to non-related tenants.

Mortgage Loans Secured by Commercial Real Properties

We have invested in, and may in the future invest in, commercial mortgages and other commercial real estate interests consistent with the requirements for qualification as a REIT. We may originate or acquire interests in mortgage loans, which may pay fixed or variable interest rates or have “participating” features. We may also invest in secured corporate loans, which are loans collateralized by real property, personal property connected to real property (i.e., fixtures) and/or personal property, on which another lender may hold a first priority lien.

B Notes

We may purchase from third parties, and may retain from mortgage loans we originate and securitize or sell, subordinated interests referred to as B Notes. B Notes share certain credit characteristics with second mortgages, in that both are subject to greater credit risk with respect to the underlying mortgage collateral than the corresponding first mortgage or A Note, and in consequence generally carry a higher rate of interest. When we acquire and/or originate B Notes, we may earn income on the investment, in addition to interest payable on the B Note, in the form of fees charged to the borrower under that note. Our ownership of a B Note with controlling class rights may, in the event the financing fails to perform according to its terms, cause us to elect to pursue our remedies as owner of the B Note, which may include foreclosure on, or modification of, the note. As a result, our economic and business interests may diverge from the interests of the holders of the A Note. These divergent interests among the holders of each investment may result in conflicts of interest.

CPA^®:17 2010 10-K — 10

We may also retain or acquire interests in A Notes and notes sometimes referred to as “C Notes,” which are junior to the B Notes.

Mezzanine Loans

We may invest in mezzanine loans. Investments in mezzanine loans take the form of subordinated loans secured by second mortgages on the underlying property or loans secured by a pledge of the ownership interests in the entity that directly or indirectly owns the property. Mezzanine loans may have elements of both debt and equity instruments, offering fixed returns in the form of interest payments and principal payments associated with senior debt, while providing lenders an opportunity to participate in the capital appreciation of a borrower, if any, through an equity interest. Due to their higher risk profile, and often less restrictive covenants as compared to senior loans, mezzanine loans generally earn a higher return than senior secured loans.

Commercial Mortgage-Backed Securities

We have invested in, and may in the future invest in, mortgage-backed securities and other mortgage related or asset-backed instruments, including CMBS issued or guaranteed by agencies of the U.S. Government, non-agency mortgage instruments, and collateralized mortgage obligations that are fully collateralized by a portfolio of mortgages or mortgage related securities to the extent consistent with the requirements for qualification as a REIT. In most cases, mortgage-backed securities distribute principal and interest payments on the mortgages to investors. Interest rates on these instruments can be fixed or variable. Some classes of mortgage-backed securities may be entitled to receive mortgage prepayments before other classes do. Therefore, the prepayment risk for a particular instrument may be different than for other mortgage-related securities. We have designated our CMBS investments as securities held to maturity. On a quarterly basis, we evaluate our CMBS to determine if they have experienced an other-than temporary decline in value.

Equity and Debt Securities of Companies Engaged in Real Estate Activities, including other REITs

We may invest in equity and debt securities (including common and preferred stock, as well as limited partnership or other interests) of companies engaged in real estate activities. Companies engaged in real estate activities and real estate related investments may include, for example, companies engaged in the net lease business, REITs that either own properties or make construction or mortgage loans, real estate developers, companies with substantial real estate holdings and other companies whose products and services are related to the real estate industry, such as building supply manufacturers, mortgage lenders or mortgage servicing companies. Such securities may or may not be readily marketable and may or may not pay current dividends or other distributions. We may acquire all or substantially all of the securities or assets of companies engaged in real estate related activities where such investment would be consistent with our investment policies and our status as a REIT. In any event, we do not intend that our investments in securities will require us to register as an “investment company” under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “Investment Company Act”), and we intend to generally divest appropriate securities before any such registration would be required.

Investment Decisions

The advisor’s investment department, under the oversight of its chief investment officer, is primarily responsible for evaluating, negotiating and structuring potential investment opportunities for us, the CPA^® REITs and WPC. Before an investment is made, the transaction is reviewed by the advisor’s investment committee, except under the circumstances described below. The investment committee is not directly involved in originating or negotiating potential investments, but instead functions as a separate and final step in the acquisition process. The advisor places special emphasis on having experienced individuals serve on its investment committee. The advisor generally will not invest in a transaction on our behalf unless it is approved by the investment committee, except that investments with a total purchase price of $10.0 million or less may be approved by either the chairman of the investment committee or the advisor’s chief investment officer (up to, in the case of investments other than long-term net leases, a cap of $30.0 million or 5% of our estimated net asset value (“NAV”), whichever is greater, provided that such investments may not have a credit rating of less than BBB-). For transactions that meet the investment criteria of more than one CPA^® REIT, the chief investment officer has discretion to allocate the investment to or among the CPA^® REITs. In cases where two or more CPA^® REITs (or one or more CPA^® REIT and WPC) will hold the investment, a majority of the independent directors of each CPA^® REIT investing in the property must also approve the transaction.

CPA^®:17 2010 10-K — 11

The following people currently serve on the investment committee:

	•		Nathaniel S. Coolidge, Chairman — Former senior vice president and head of the bond and corporate finance department of John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance (currently known as John Hancock Life Insurance Company). Mr. Coolidge’s responsibilities included overseeing its entire portfolio of fixed income investments.
	•		Axel K.A. Hansing — Currently serving as a senior partner at Coller Capital, Ltd., a global leader in the private equity secondary market, and responsible for investment activity in parts of Europe, Turkey and South Africa.
	•		Frank J. Hoenemeyer — Former vice chairman and chief investment officer of the Prudential Insurance Company of America. As chief investment officer, he was responsible for all of Prudential Insurance Company of America’s investments including stocks, bonds and real estate.
	•		Jean Hoysradt — Currently serving as the chief investment officer of Mousse Partners Limited, an investment office based in New York.
	•		Dr. Lawrence R. Klein — Currently serving as professor emeritus of economics and finance at the University of Pennsylvania and its Wharton School. Recipient of the 1980 Nobel Prize in economic sciences and former consultant to both the Federal Reserve Board and the President’s Council of Economic Advisors.
	•		Richard C. Marston — Currently the James R.F. Guy professor of economics and finance at the University of Pennsylvania and its Wharton School.
	•		Nick J.M. van Ommen — Former chief executive officer of the European Public Real Estate Association (EPRA), currently serves on the supervisory boards of several companies, including Babis Vovos International Construction SA, a listed real estate company in Greece, Intervest Retail and Intervest Offices, listed real estate companies in Belgium, BUWOG / ESG, a residential leasing and development company in Austria and IMMOFINANZ, a listed real estate company in Austria.
	•		Dr. Karsten von Köller — Currently chairman of Lone Star Germany GMBH, a U.S. private equity firm (“Lone Star”), Chairman of the Supervisory Board of Düsseldorfer Hypothekenbank AG, a subsidiary of Lone Star, and Vice Chairman of the Supervisory Boards of IKB Deutsche Industriebank AG, Corealcredit Bank AG and MHB Bank AG.

The advisor is required to use its best efforts to present a continuing and suitable investment program to us but is not required to present to us any particular investment opportunity, even if it is of a character that, if presented, could be taken by us.

Segments

We operate in one industry segment, real estate ownership, with domestic and foreign investments. The New York Times Company represented 29% of our total 2010 lease revenues, inclusive of noncontrolling interests. Berry Plastics Corporation, Berry Plastics Holding Corporation and Berry Plastics Acquisition Corporation VII (collectively, “Berry Plastics”) are the tenants of three properties pursuant to a net lease with BPLAST LANDLORD (DE) LLC, which was a material equity investment of the Company for 2008. As a result, separate financial statements of BPLAST LANDLORD (DE) LLC are included in this Report. See Item 15 (a) (2).

Competition

In raising funds for investment, we face active competition from other funds with similar investment objectives that seek to raise funds from investors through publicly registered, non-traded funds, publicly-traded funds and private funds such as hedge funds. In addition, we face broad competition from other forms of investment.

We face active competition from many sources for investment opportunities in commercial properties net leased to major corporations both domestically and internationally. In general, we believe the advisor’s experience in real estate, credit underwriting and transaction structuring should allow us to compete effectively for commercial properties and other real estate related assets. However, competitors may be willing to accept rates of return, lease terms, other transaction terms or levels of risk that we may find unacceptable.

CPA^®:17 2010 10-K — 12

Environmental Matters

We will generally invest in properties that are currently or historically used for commercial purposes, including industrial, manufacturing and commercial properties. Under various federal, state and local environmental laws and regulations, current and former owners and operators of property may have liability for the cost of investigating, cleaning up or disposing of hazardous materials released at, on, under, in or from the property. These laws typically impose responsibility and liability without regard to whether the owner or operator knew of or was responsible for the presence of hazardous materials or contamination, and liability under these laws is often joint and several. Third parties may also make claims against owners or operators of properties for personal injuries and property damage associated with releases of hazardous materials. As part of our efforts to mitigate these risks, we typically engage third parties to perform assessments of potential environmental risks when evaluating a new acquisition of property, and we intend to frequently obtain contractual protection (indemnities, cash reserves, letters of credit or other instruments) from property sellers, tenants, a tenant’s parent company or another third-party to address known or potential environmental issues.

Transactions with Affiliates

We have entered, and expect in the future to enter, into transactions with our affiliates, including the other CPA^® REITs and WPC or its affiliates, if we believe that doing so is consistent with our investment objectives and we comply with our investment policies and procedures. These transactions typically take the form of jointly-owned ventures, direct purchases of assets, mergers or another type of transaction. Like us, the other CPA^® REITs intend to consider alternatives for providing liquidity for their shareholders some years after they have invested substantially all of the net proceeds from their initial public offerings. Ventures with affiliates of WPC are permitted only if a majority of our directors (including a majority of our independent directors) not otherwise interested in the transaction approve the allocation of the transaction among the affiliates as being fair and reasonable to us and the affiliate makes its investment on substantially the same terms and conditions as us.

(d) Financial Information About Geographic Areas

See Our Portfolio above and Note 16 of the consolidated financial statements for financial information pertaining to our geographic operations.

(e) Available Information

All filings we make with the SEC, including our Annual Report on Form 10-K, our quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, and our current reports on Form 8-K, and any amendments to those reports, are available for free on our website, http://www.cpa17global.com, as soon as reasonably practicable after they are filed with or furnished to the SEC. Our SEC filings are available to be read or copied at the SEC’s Public Reference Room at 100 F Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20549. Information regarding the operation of the Public Reference Room can be obtained by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. Our filings can also be obtained for free on the SEC’s Internet site at http://www.sec.gov. We are providing our website address solely for the information of investors. We do not intend our website to be an active link or to otherwise incorporate the information contained on our website into this report. We will supply to any shareholder, upon written request and without charge, a copy of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the SEC.

Item 1A. Risk Factors.

Our business, results of operations, financial condition and ability to pay distributions at the current rate could be materially adversely affected by various risks and uncertainties, including the conditions below. These risk factors may have affected, and in the future could affect, our actual operating and financial results and could cause such results to differ materially from those in any forward-looking statements. You should not consider this list exhaustive. New risk factors emerge periodically, and we cannot assure you that the factors described below list all risks that may become material to us at any later time.

The recent financial and economic crisis adversely affected our business, and the continued uncertainty in the global economic environment may adversely affect our business in the future.

Although we have seen signs of modest improvement in the global economy following the significant distress in 2008 and 2009, the economic recovery remains weak, and our business is still dependent on the speed and strength of that recovery, which cannot be predicted at the present time. To date, its effects on our business have been somewhat limited. At the date of this Report, we have one tenant, Waldaschaff Automotive GmbH, who has filed for bankruptcy and is making significantly reduced rent payments.

Depending on the strength of the recovery, we could in the future experience a number of additional effects on our business, including higher levels of default in the payment of rent by our tenants, additional bankruptcies and impairments in the value of our property investments, as well as difficulties in refinancing existing loans as they come due. Any of these conditions may negatively affect our earnings, as well as our cash flow and, consequently, our ability to sustain the payment of dividends at current levels.

CPA^®:17 2010 10-K — 13

Our earnings or cash flow may also be adversely affected by other events, such as increases in the value of the U.S. Dollar relative to other currencies in which we receive rent, as well as the need to expend cash to fund increased redemptions. Additionally, our ability to make new investments will be affected by the availability of financing as well as our ability to raise new funds.

Deterioration in the credit markets could adversely affect our ability to finance or refinance investments and the ability of our tenants to meet their obligations, which could affect our ability to meet our financial objectives.

During the recent economic crisis, loans backed by real estate became increasingly difficult to obtain, and where obtainable, rates increased and terms became more onerous, as compared with prior years. Although we have recently seen a gradual improvement in capital market conditions, any reduction in available financing will affect our ability to achieve our financial objectives. Among other things, we may be unable to finance future acquisitions, which could cause potential acquisitions to fail to meet our investment criteria or, even if we determine that such criteria are met, reduce our returns until such time, if ever, as we are able to obtain financing for such investments. Even where we are able to obtain financing, higher costs of borrowing may negatively affect our profitability and cash flow. In addition, failure to obtain financing, or obtaining financing at reduced leverage ratios, will adversely affect our ability to achieve diversification in our overall portfolio, as the number of different investments we can make with our capital will be reduced.

In addition, the creditworthiness of some of our tenants was adversely affected by the recent credit crisis, and others may be adversely affected in the future if the lack of credit and available financing to fund their business operations returns. Any such effects could adversely impact our tenants’ ability to meet their ongoing lease obligations to us, which could in turn adversely affect our ability to make distributions.

Our distributions have exceeded, and may in the future exceed, our earnings in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) and our adjusted cash flow from operating activities and may be paid from offering proceeds, borrowing proceeds and other sources, without limitation, particularly during the period before we have substantially invested the remaining net proceeds from our offering.

Over the life of our company, the regular quarterly cash distributions we pay are expected to be principally sourced by adjusted cash flow from operating activities. Adjusted cash flow from operating activities represents GAAP cash flow from operating activities, adjusted primarily to reflect timing differences between the period an expense is incurred and paid, to add cash distributions we receive from equity investments in real estate in excess of equity income and to subtract cash distributions we pay to our noncontrolling partners in real estate joint ventures that we consolidate. However, we have funded a portion of our cash distributions paid to date using net proceeds from our initial public offering and may do so in the future, particularly until we have substantially invested the offering net proceeds. In addition, our distributions paid to date have exceeded our GAAP earnings and future distributions may do the same, particularly until we have substantially invested the net proceeds of our offering. If our properties are not generating sufficient cash flow or our other expenses require it, we may need to sell properties or other assets, incur indebtedness or use offering proceeds if necessary to satisfy the REIT requirement that we distribute at least 90% of our REIT net taxable income, excluding net capital gains, and to avoid the payment of federal income tax. If we fund distributions from financings, then such financings will need to be repaid, and if we fund distributions from offering proceeds, then we will have fewer funds available for the acquisition of properties, which may affect our ability to generate future cash flows from operations and, therefore, reduce your overall return.

For U.S. federal income tax purposes, portions of the distributions we make may represent return of capital to our shareholders if they exceed our earnings and profits.

We were incorporated in February 2007 and have a limited operating history; therefore, there is no assurance that we will be able to achieve our investment objectives.

We were incorporated in February 2007 and have a limited operating history and a limited number of assets. We are subject to all of the business risks and uncertainties associated with any relatively new business, including the risk that we will not achieve our investment objectives as described in this Report and that the value of your investment could decline substantially. Our financial condition and results of operations will depend on many factors, including the availability of opportunities for the acquisition of assets, readily accessible short and long-term financing, conditions in the financial markets, economic conditions generally, and the performance of our advisor. There can be no assurance that we will be able to generate sufficient cash flow over time to pay our operating expenses and make distributions to shareholders.

CPA^®:17 2010 10-K — 14

The offering price for shares being offered in our ongoing public offering and through our distribution reinvestment plan was determined by our board of directors and may not be indicative of the price at which the shares would trade if they were listed on an exchange or were actively traded by brokers.

The offering price of the shares being offered in our ongoing public offering and through our distribution reinvestment plan was determined by our board of directors in the exercise of its business judgment. This price may not be indicative of the price at which shares would trade if they were listed on an exchange or actively traded by brokers nor of the proceeds that a shareholder would receive if we were liquidated or dissolved or of the value of our portfolio at the time you purchased shares.

A delay in investing funds may adversely affect or cause a delay in our ability to deliver expected returns to investors and may adversely affect our performance.

We have not yet identified most of the assets to be purchased with the remaining proceeds of our ongoing public offering and our distribution reinvestment plan; therefore, there could be a substantial delay between the time you invest in shares and the time substantially all the proceeds are invested by us. Delays in investing our capital could also arise from the fact that our advisor is simultaneously seeking to locate suitable investments for the other operating CPA^® REITs managed by our advisor and its affiliates. We currently expect that, if the entire offering is subscribed for, it may take up to two years after commencement of the offering or one year after the termination of our offering, if later, until our capital is substantially invested. Pending investment, the balance of the proceeds of our offering will be invested in permitted temporary investments, which include short-term U.S. government securities, bank certificates of deposit and other short term liquid investments. The rate of return on those investments, which affects the amount of cash available to make distributions to shareholders, has been extremely low in recent years and most likely will be less than the return obtainable from real property or other investments. Therefore, delays in our ability to invest the proceeds of our offering could adversely affect our ability to pay distributions to our shareholders and adversely affect your total return. If we fail to timely invest the net proceeds of our offering or to invest in quality assets, our ability to achieve our investment objectives could be materially adversely affected. In addition, because we have not identified most of the assets to be purchased with the remaining net proceeds of our offering, uncertainty and risk is increased to you as you will be unable to evaluate the manner in which the net proceeds are to be invested.

We may recognize substantial impairment charges on our properties.

We have incurred, and may in the future incur, substantial impairment charges, which we are required to recognize whenever we sell a property for less than its carrying value or we determine that the carrying amount of the property is not recoverable and exceeds its fair value (or, for direct financing leases, that the unguaranteed residual value of the underlying property has declined). By their nature, the timing or extent of impairment charges are not predictable. We may incur impairment charges in the future, which may reduce our net income, although it will not necessarily affect our cash flow from operations.

Our board of directors may change our investment policies without shareholder approval, which could alter the nature of your investment.

Our charter requires that our independent directors review our investment policies at least annually to determine that the policies we are following are in the best interest of our shareholders. These policies may change over time. The methods of implementing our investment policies may also vary, as new investment techniques are developed. Our investment policies, the methods for their implementation, and our other objectives, policies and procedures may be altered by a majority of the directors (which must include a majority of the independent directors), without the approval of our shareholders. As a result, the nature of your investment could change without your consent. A change in our investment strategy may, among other things, increase our exposure to interest rate risk, default risk and commercial real property market fluctuations, all of which could materially adversely affect our ability to achieve our investment objectives.

We are not required to meet any diversification standards; therefore, our investments may become subject to concentration of risk.

Subject to our intention to maintain our qualification as a REIT, there are no limitations on the number or value of particular types of investments that we may make. Although we attempt to do so, we are not required to meet any diversification standards, including geographic diversification standards. If we raise less money in our public offering than anticipated, we will have fewer assets and less diversification. Our investments may become concentrated in type or geographic location, which could subject us to significant concentration of risk with potentially adverse effects on our investment objectives. Approximately 29% of our lease revenue in 2010 was derived from our net financing lease with The New York Times Company. A failure by The New York Times to meet its obligations to us could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations and on our ability to pay distributions to our shareholders.

CPA^®:17 2010 10-K — 15

Our success will be dependent on the performance of our advisor.

Our ability to achieve our investment objectives and to pay distributions will be largely dependent upon the performance of our advisor in the acquisition of investments, the selection of tenants, the determination of any financing arrangements, and the management of our assets. The advisory agreement has a one year term and may be renewed at our option upon expiration. The past performance of partnerships and CPA^® REITs managed by our advisor may not be indicative of our advisor’s performance with respect to us. We cannot guarantee that our advisor will be able to successfully manage and achieve liquidity for us to the extent it has done so for prior REITs.

We may invest in assets outside our advisor’s core expertise and incur losses as a result.

We are not restricted in the types of investments we may make and we may invest in assets outside our advisor’s core expertise of long-term net leased properties. Our advisor may not be as familiar with the potential risks of investments outside net leased properties. If we invest in assets outside our advisor’s core expertise, the fact that our advisor does not have the same level of experience in evaluating investments outside its core business could result in such investments performing more poorly than long-term net lease investments, which in turn could adversely affect our revenues, NAV’s, and distributions to shareholders.

Our advisor has limited experience managing a REIT that has a broad investment strategy such as ours.

Our advisor has limited experience managing a REIT that has a broad investment strategy such as ours. The experience of our advisor consists mainly of making investments on behalf of the CPA^® REITs in net leased properties. If we invest in other asset classes, our advisor’s lack of investing experience could cause increased investment expenses or lower quality investments than anticipated and therefore could adversely affect our revenues and distributions to our shareholders.

WPC and our sales agent are parties to a settlement agreement with the SEC and are subject to a federal court injunction.

In 2008, WPC and Carey Financial, the sales agent for this offering, settled all matters relating to an investigation by the SEC, including matters relating to payments by certain CPA^® REITs other than us during 2000-2003 to broker-dealers that distributed their shares, which were alleged by the SEC to be undisclosed underwriting compensation, which WPC and Carey Financial neither admitted nor denied. In connection with implementing the settlement, a federal court injunction has been entered against WPC and Carey Financial enjoining them from violating a number of provisions of the federal securities laws. Any further violation of these laws by WPC or Carey Financial could result in civil remedies, including sanctions, fines and penalties, which may be more severe than if the violation had occurred without the injunction being in place. Additionally, if WPC or Carey Financial breaches the terms of the injunction, the SEC may petition the court to vacate the settlement and restore the SEC’s original action to the active docket for all purposes.

The settlement is not binding on other regulatory authorities, including the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (“FINRA”), which regulates Carey Financial, state securities regulators, or other regulatory organizations, which may seek to commence proceedings or take action against WPC or its affiliates on the basis of the settlement or otherwise.

Additional regulatory action, litigation or governmental proceedings could adversely affect us by, among other things, distracting WPC and Carey Financial from their duties to us, resulting in significant monetary damages to WPC and Carey Financial which could adversely affect their ability to perform services for us, or resulting in injunctions or other restrictions on WPC’s or Carey Financial’s ability to act as our advisor and sales agent, respectively, in the U.S. or in one or more states.

Exercising our right to repurchase all or a portion of Carey Holdings’ interests in our operating partnership upon certain termination events could be prohibitively expensive and could deter us from terminating the advisory agreement.

The termination of Carey Asset Management as our advisor, including by non-renewal of the advisory agreement, and replacement with an entity that is not an affiliate of Carey Asset Management, or the resignation of our advisor for good reason, all after two years from the start of operations of our operating partnership, would give our operating partnership the right, but not the obligation, to repurchase all or a portion of Carey Holdings’ interests in our operating partnership at the fair market value of those interests on the date of termination, as determined by an independent appraiser. This repurchase could be prohibitively expensive, could require the

CPA^®:17 2010 10-K — 16

operating partnership to have to sell assets to raise sufficient funds to complete the repurchase and could discourage or deter us from terminating the advisory agreement. Alternatively, if our operating partnership does not exercise its repurchase right and Carey Holdings’ interest is converted into a special limited partnership interest, we might be unable to find another entity that would be willing to act as our advisor while Carey Holdings owns a significant interest in the operating partnership. If we do find another entity to act as our advisor, we may be subject to higher fees than the fees charged by Carey Asset Management.

The repurchase of Carey Holdings’ special general partner interest in our operating partnership upon the termination of Carey Asset Management as our advisor may discourage a takeover attempt if our advisory agreement would be terminated and Carey Asset Management not replaced by an affiliate of Carey Asset Management as our advisor in connection therewith.

In the event of a merger in which our advisory agreement is terminated and Carey Asset Management is not replaced by an affiliate of Carey Asset Management as our advisor, the operating partnership must either repurchase all or a portion of Carey Holdings’ special general partner interest in our operating partnership or obtain the consent of Carey Holdings to the merger. This obligation may deter a transaction that could result in a merger in which we are not the survivor. This deterrence may limit the opportunity for shareholders to receive a premium for their shares of common stock that might otherwise exist if an investor attempted to acquire us through a merger.

The termination or replacement of our advisor could trigger a default or repayment event under our financing arrangements for some of our assets.

Lenders for certain of our assets may request change of control provisions in the loan documentation that would make the termination or replacement of WPC or its affiliates as our advisor an event of default or an event requiring the immediate repayment of the full outstanding balance of the loan. If an event of default or repayment event occurs with respect to any of our assets, our revenues and distributions to our shareholders may be adversely affected.

Payment of fees to our advisor, and distributions to our special general partner, will reduce cash available for investment and distribution.

Our advisor will perform services for us in connection with the offer and sale of our shares, the selection and acquisition of our investments, the management and leasing of our properties and the administration of our other investments. Unless our advisor elects to receive our common stock in lieu of cash compensation, we will pay our advisor substantial cash fees for these services. In addition, our special general partner is entitled to certain distributions from our operating partnership. The payment of these fees and distributions will reduce the amount of cash available for investments or distribution to our shareholders.

Our advisor may be subject to conflicts of interest.

Our advisor manages our business and selects our investments. Our advisor has some conflicts of interest in its management of us, which arise primarily from the involvement of our advisor in other activities that may conflict with us and the payment of fees by us to our advisor. Circumstances under which a conflict could arise between us and our advisor include:

	•		the receipt of compensation by our advisor for acquisitions of investments, leases, sales and financing for us, which may cause our advisor to engage in transactions that generate higher fees, rather than transactions that are more appropriate or beneficial for our business;
	•		agreements between us and our advisor, including agreements regarding compensation, will not be negotiated on an arm’s-length basis as would occur if the agreements were with unaffiliated third parties;
	•		acquisitions of single assets or portfolios of assets from affiliates, including the other operating CPA® REITs, subject to our investment policies and procedures, which may take the form of a direct purchase of assets, a merger or another type of transaction;
	•		competition with certain affiliates for investment acquisitions, which may cause our advisor and its affiliates to direct investments suitable for us to other related entities;
	•		a decision by our advisor (on our behalf) of whether to hold or sell an asset. This decision could impact the timing and amount of fees payable to our advisor as well as allocations and distributions payable to Carey Holdings pursuant to its special general partner interests. On the one hand, our advisor receives asset management fees and may decide not to sell an asset. On the other hand, Carey Holdings will be entitled to certain profit allocations and cash distributions based upon sales of assets as a result of its operating partnership profits interest;

CPA^®:17 2010 10-K — 17

	•		a recommendation by our advisor that we declare distributions at a particular rate because our advisor and Carey Holdings may begin collecting subordinated fees and subordinated distributions once the applicable preferred return rate has been met; and
	•		disposition fees based on the sale price of assets and interests in disposition proceeds based on net cash proceeds from sale, exchange or other disposition of assets may cause a conflict between the advisor’s desire to sell an asset and our plans to hold or sell the asset.

We delegate our management functions to the advisor.

We delegate our management functions to the advisor, for which it earns fees pursuant to an advisory agreement. Although at least a majority of our board of directors must be independent, because the advisor earns fees from us and has an ownership interest in us, we have limited independence from the advisor.

We face competition from affiliates of our advisor in the purchase, sale, lease and operation of properties.

WPC and its affiliates specialize in providing lease financing services to corporations and in sponsoring funds, such as the CPA^® REITs, and to a lesser extent CWI, that invest in real estate. The other operating CPA^® REITs have investment policies and return objectives that are similar to ours and CWI is currently actively seeking opportunities to invest capital. Therefore, WPC and its affiliates, including other operating CPA^® REITs, CWI, and future entities advised by WPC, may compete with us with respect to properties, potential purchasers, sellers and lessees of properties, and mortgage financing for properties. We do not have a non-competition agreement with WPC, the other operating CPA^® REITs, or CWI and there are no restrictions on WPC’s ability to sponsor or manage funds or other investment vehicles that may compete with us in the future. Some of the entities formed and managed by WPC may be focused specifically on particular types of investments and receive preference in the allocation of those types of investments.

If we internalize our management functions, the percentage of our outstanding common stock owned by our other stockholders could be reduced, and we could incur other significant costs associated with being self-managed.

In the future, our board of directors may consider internalizing the functions performed for us by our advisor by, among other methods, acquiring our advisor’s assets. The method by which we could internalize these functions could take many forms. There is no assurance that internalizing our management functions will be beneficial to us and our shareholders. An acquisition of our advisor could also result in dilution of your interests as a shareholder and could reduce earnings per share and funds from operation per share. Additionally, we may not realize the perceived benefits or we may not be able to properly integrate a new staff of managers and employees or we may not be able to effectively replicate the services provided previously by our advisor, property manager or their affiliates. Internalization transactions, including without limitation, transactions involving the acquisition of advisors or property managers affiliated with entity sponsors have also, in some cases, been the subject of litigation. Even if these claims are without merit, we could be forced to spend significant amounts of money defending claims which would reduce the amount of funds available for us to invest in properties or other investments and to pay distributions. All of these factors could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition and ability to pay distributions.

Our advisor may hire subadvisors in areas where our advisor is seeking additional expertise. Shareholders will not be able to review these subadvisors, and our advisor may not have sufficient expertise to monitor the subadvisors.

Our advisor has the right to appoint one or more subadvisors with expertise in our target asset classes to assist our advisor with investment decisions and asset management. We do not have control over which subadvisors our advisor may choose and our advisor may not have the necessary expertise to effectively monitor the subadvisors’ investment decisions.

We do not fully control the management of our properties.

The tenants or managers of net leased properties are responsible for maintenance and other day-to-day management of the properties. If a property is not adequately maintained in accordance with the terms of the applicable lease, we may incur expenses for deferred maintenance expenditures or other liabilities once the property becomes free of the lease. A bankrupt or financially troubled tenant may be more likely to defer maintenance and it may be more difficult to enforce remedies, including those provided in the applicable lease, against such a tenant. In addition, to the extent tenants are unable to conduct their operation of the property on a financially

CPA^®:17 2010 10-K — 18

successful basis, their ability to pay rent may be adversely affected. Monitoring, on an ongoing basis, compliance by tenants with their lease obligations and other factors that could affect the financial performance of our properties, may not in all circumstances ascertain or forestall deterioration either in the condition of a property or the financial circumstances of a tenant.

We may incur material losses on some of our investments.

Our objective is to generate attractive risk adjusted returns, which means that we will take on risk in order to achieve higher returns. We expect that we will incur losses on some of our investments. Some of those losses could be material.

A potential change in U.S. accounting standards regarding operating leases may make the leasing of facilities less attractive to our potential domestic tenants, which could reduce overall demand for our leasing services.

Under current authoritative accounting guidance for leases, a lease is classified by a tenant as a capital lease if the significant risks and rewards of ownership are considered to reside with the tenant. This situation is considered to be met if, among other things, the non-cancellable lease term is more than 75% of the useful life of the asset or if the present value of the minimum lease payments equals 90% or more of the leased property’s fair value. Under capital lease accounting for a tenant, both the leased asset and liability are reflected on their balance sheet. If the lease does not meet any of the criteria for a capital lease, the lease is considered an operating lease by the tenant and the obligation does not appear on the tenant’s balance sheet; rather, the contractual future minimum payment obligations are only disclosed in the footnotes thereto. Thus, entering into an operating lease can appear to enhance a tenant’s balance sheet in comparison to direct ownership. In response to concerns caused by a 2005 SEC study that the current model does not have sufficient transparency, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) and the International Accounting Standards Board conducted a joint project to re-evaluate lease accounting. In August 2010, the FASB issued a Proposed Accounting Standards Update titled “Leases,” providing its views on accounting for leases by both lessees and lessors. The FASB’s proposed guidance may require significant changes in how leases are accounted for by both lessees and lessors. As of the date of this Report, the FASB has not finalized its views on accounting for leases. Changes to the accounting guidance could affect both our accounting for leases as well as that of our tenants. These changes may affect how the real estate leasing business is conducted both domestically and internationally. For example, if the accounting standards regarding the financial statement classification of operating leases are revised, then companies may be less willing to enter into leases in general or desire to enter into leases with shorter terms because the apparent benefits to their balance sheets could be reduced or eliminated. This in turn could make it more difficult for us to enter into leases on terms we find favorable.

Our net tangible book value may be adversely affected if we are required to adopt certain fair value accounting provisions.

In June 2007, the Accounting Standards Executive Committee of the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (“AICPA”) issued accounting guidance that addresses when the accounting principles of the AICPA Audit and Accounting Guide “Investment Companies” must be applied by an entity and whether investment company accounting must be retained by a parent company in consolidation or by an investor in the application of the equity method of accounting. In addition, this guidance includes certain disclosure requirements for parent companies and equity method investors in investment companies that retain investment company accounting in the parent company’s consolidated financial statements or the financial statements of an equity method investor. In February 2008, the effective date of this guidance was indefinitely delayed, and adoption of the guidance was prohibited for any entity that had not previously adopted it. Additionally, in its investment properties project, the FASB is currently considering whether certain entities should measure investment property at fair value. As currently proposed, an entity would need to meet certain criteria related to its business purpose, activities, and capital structure to be within the scope of the guidance. Entities within the scope of the guidance would report all their investment properties at fair value on a recurring basis. We will assess the potential impact the adoption of these standards would have on our financial position and results of operations if we are required to adopt them.

While we maintain an exemption from the Investment Company Act, and are therefore not regulated as an investment company, we may be required to adopt fair value accounting provisions. Under these provisions, our investments would be recorded at fair value with changes in value reflected in our earnings, which may result in significant fluctuations in our results of operations and net tangible book value. Net tangible book value per share may be reduced by any declines in the fair value of our investments.

Our participation in joint ventures creates additional risk.

From time to time we participate in joint ventures and purchase assets jointly with the other operating CPA^® REITs and/or WPC and may do so as well with third parties. There are additional risks involved in joint venture transactions. As a co-investor in a joint venture, we would not be in a position to exercise sole decision-making authority relating to the property, joint venture or other entity.

CPA^®:17 2010 10-K — 19

In addition, there is the potential of our joint venture partner becoming bankrupt and the possibility of diverging or inconsistent economic or business interests of us and our partner. These diverging interests could result in, among other things, exposing us to liabilities of the joint venture in excess of our proportionate share of these liabilities. The partition rights of each owner in a jointly-owned property could reduce the value of each portion of the divided property. In addition, the fiduciary obligation that our advisor or members of our board may owe to our partner in an affiliated transaction may make it more difficult for us to enforce our rights.

Our operations could be restricted if we become subject to the Investment Company Act and your investment return, if any, may be reduced if we are required to register as an investment company under the Investment Company Act.

A person will generally be deemed to be an “investment company” for purposes of the Investment Company Act if:

	•		it is or holds itself out as being engaged primarily, or proposes to engage primarily, in the business of investing, reinvesting or trading in securities; or
	•		it owns or proposes to acquire investment securities having a value exceeding 40% of the value of its total assets (exclusive of U.S. government securities and cash items) on an unconsolidated basis, which is referred to as the “40% test.”

We believe that we are engaged primarily in the business of acquiring and owning interests in real estate. We hold ourselves out as a real estate firm and do not propose to engage primarily in the business of investing, reinvesting or trading in securities. Accordingly, we do not believe that we are, or following this offering will be, an “orthodox” investment company as defined in section 3(a)(1)(A) of the Investment Company Act and described in the first bullet point above. Further, following this offering, we will have no material assets other than our 99.97% ownership interest in the operating partnership. Excepted from the term “investment securities” for purposes of the 40% test described above, are securities issued by majority-owned subsidiaries, such as our operating partnership, that are not themselves investment companies and are not relying on the exception from the definition of investment company set forth in Section 3(c)(1) or Section 3(c)(7) of the Investment Company Act.

Our operating partnership relies upon the exemption from registration as an investment company pursuant to Section 3(c)(5)(C) of the Investment Company Act, which is available for entities “primarily engaged in the business of purchasing or otherwise acquiring mortgages and other liens on and interests in real estate.” This exemption generally requires that at least 55% of the operating partnership’s assets must be comprised of qualifying real estate assets and at least 80% of its portfolio must be comprised of qualifying real estate assets and real estate-related assets. Qualifying assets for this purpose include mortgage loans and other assets, including certain mezzanine loans, B Notes and C Notes, that the SEC staff in various no-action letters has affirmed can be treated as qualifying assets. We treat as real estate-related assets CMBS, debt and equity securities of companies primarily engaged in real estate businesses and securities issued by pass through entities of which substantially all the assets consist of qualifying assets and/or real estate-related assets. We rely on guidance published by the SEC staff or on our analyses of guidance published with respect to other types of assets to determine which assets are qualifying real estate assets and real estate-related assets. To the extent that the SEC staff publishes new or different guidance with respect to these matters, we may be required to adjust our strategy accordingly. In addition, we may be limited in our ability to make certain investments and these limitations could result in the operating partnership holding assets we might wish to sell or selling assets we might wish to hold.

We may use derivative financial instruments to hedge against interest rate and currency fluctuations, which could reduce the overall returns on your investment.

We may use derivative financial instruments to hedge exposures to changes in interest rates and currency rates. These instruments involve risk, such as the risk that counterparties may fail to perform under the terms of the derivative contract or that such arrangements may not be effective in reducing our exposure to interest rate changes. In addition, the possible use of such instruments may reduce the overall return on our investments. These instruments may also generate income that may not be treated as qualifying REIT income for purposes of the 75% or 95% REIT income test.

International investment risks may adversely affect our operations and our ability to make distributions.

We have purchased and may in the future purchase properties and/or assets secured by properties or interests in properties located outside the U.S. Foreign real estate investments involve certain risks not generally associated with investments in the U.S. These risks include unexpected changes in regulatory requirements, political and economic instability in certain geographic locations, potential imposition of adverse or confiscatory taxes, possible challenges to the anticipated tax treatment of the structures through which we acquire and hold investments, possible currency transfer restrictions, expropriation, the difficulty in enforcing obligations in other countries and the burden of complying with a wide variety of foreign laws. Each of these risks might adversely affect our performance

CPA^®:17 2010 10-K — 20

and impair our ability to make distributions to our shareholders required to maintain our REIT qualification. In addition, there is less publicly available information about foreign companies and a lack of uniform financial accounting standards and practices (including the availability of information in accordance with GAAP) which could impair our ability to analyze transactions and receive timely and accurate financial information from tenants necessary to meet our reporting obligations to financial institutions or governmental or regulatory agencies. Certain of these risks may be greater in emerging markets and less developed countries.

We may invest in new geographic areas that have risks that are greater or less well known to us, and we may incur losses as a result.

We may purchase properties and assets secured by properties located outside the U.S. and Europe. Our advisor’s expertise to date is primarily in the U.S. and Europe and our advisor does not have the same expertise in other international markets. Our advisor may not be as familiar with the potential risks to our investments outside the U.S. and Europe, and we may incur losses as a result.

We will incur debt to finance our operations, which may subject us to an increased risk of loss.

We will incur debt to finance our operations. The leverage we employ will vary depending on our ability to obtain credit facilities, the loan-to-value and debt service coverage ratios of our assets, the yield on our assets, the targeted leveraged return we expect from our investment portfolio and our ability to meet ongoing covenants related to our asset mix and financial performance. Our return on our investments and cash available for distribution to our shareholders may be reduced to the extent that changes in market conditions cause the cost of our financing to increase relative to the income that we can derive from the assets we acquire.

Debt service payments may reduce the net income available for distributions to our shareholders. Moreover, we may not be able to meet our debt service obligations and, to the extent that we cannot, we risk the loss of some or all of our assets to foreclosure or sale to satisfy our debt obligations. Our charter or bylaws do not restrict the form of indebtedness we may incur.

The inability of a tenant in a single tenant property to pay rent will reduce our revenues and increase our expenses.

We expect that most of our commercial real estate properties will each be occupied by a single tenant, and therefore the success of our investments is materially dependent on the financial stability of such tenants. Lease payment defaults by tenants could cause us to reduce the amount of distributions to our shareholders. A default of a tenant on its lease payments to us would cause us to lose the revenue from the property and cause us to have to find an alternative source of revenue to meet any mortgage payment and prevent a foreclosure if the property is subject to a mortgage. In the event of a default, we may experience delays in enforcing our rights as landlord and may incur substantial costs in protecting our investment and re-letting our property. If a lease is terminated, there is no assurance that we will be able to lease the property for the rent previously received or sell the property without incurring a loss. Approximately 29% of our lease revenue in 2010 was derived from our net financing lease with The New York Times Company. A failure by The New York Times to meet its obligations to us could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations and our ability to pay distributions to our shareholders.

The bankruptcy or insolvency of tenants or borrowers may cause a reduction in revenue.

Bankruptcy or insolvency of a tenant or borrower could cause:

	•		the loss of lease or interest payments;
	•		an increase in the costs incurred to carry the asset;
	•		litigation;
	•		a reduction in the value of our shares; and
	•		a decrease in distributions to our shareholders.

Under U.S. bankruptcy law, a tenant who is the subject of bankruptcy proceedings has the option of assuming or rejecting any unexpired lease. If the tenant rejects the lease, any resulting claim we have for breach of the lease (excluding collateral securing the claim) will be treated as a general unsecured claim. The maximum claim will be capped at the amount owed for unpaid rent prior to the bankruptcy unrelated to the termination, plus the greater of one year’s lease payments or 15% of the remaining lease payments payable under the lease (but no more than three years’ lease payments). In addition, due to the long-term nature of our leases and terms providing for the repurchase of a property by the tenant, a bankruptcy court could recharacterize a net lease transaction as a secured lending transaction. If that were to occur, we would not be treated as the owner of the property, but might have rights as a secured creditor. Those rights would not include a right to compel the tenant to timely perform its obligations under the lease but may instead entitle us to “adequate protection,” a bankruptcy concept that applies to protect against a decrease in the value of the property if the value of the property is less than the balance owed to us.

CPA^®:17 2010 10-K — 21

Insolvency laws outside of the U.S. may not be as favorable to reorganization or to the protection of a debtor’s rights as tenants under a lease as are the laws in the U.S. Our rights to terminate a lease for default may be more likely to be enforceable in countries other than the U.S., in which a debtor/ tenant or its insolvency representative may be less likely to have rights to force continuation of a lease without our consent. Nonetheless, such laws may permit a tenant or an appointed insolvency representative to terminate a lease if it so chooses.

However, in circumstances where the bankruptcy laws of the U.S. are considered to be more favorable to debtors and to their reorganization, entities that are not ordinarily perceived as U.S. entities may seek to take advantage of the U.S. bankruptcy laws if they are eligible. An entity would be eligible to be a debtor under the U.S. bankruptcy laws if it had a domicile (state of incorporation or registration), place of business or assets in the U.S. If a tenant became a debtor under the U.S. bankruptcy laws, then it would have the option of assuming or rejecting any unexpired lease. As a general matter, after the commencement of bankruptcy proceedings and prior to assumption or rejection of an expired lease, U.S. bankruptcy laws provide that until an unexpired lease is assumed or rejected, the tenant (or its trustee if one has been appointed) must timely perform obligations of the tenant under the lease. However, under certain circumstances, the time period for performance of such obligations may be extended by an order of the bankruptcy court.

We and the other CPA^® REITs managed by our advisor or its affiliates have had tenants file for bankruptcy protection and have been involved in litigation (including internationally). Four prior CPA^® REITs reduced the rate of distributions to their investors as a result of adverse developments involving tenants.

Similarly, if a borrower under our loan transactions declares bankruptcy, there may not be sufficient funds to satisfy its payment obligations to us, which may adversely affect our revenue and distributions to our shareholders. The mortgage loans in which we may invest and the mortgage loans underlying the commercial mortgage-backed securities in which we may invest will be subject to delinquency, foreclosure and loss, which could result in losses to us.

In connection with entering into bankruptcy administration, a former tenant, Wagon Automotive GmbH, terminated its lease with us in May 2009 and a successor company, Waldaschaff Automotive GmbH, took over the business and has been paying rent to us, albeit at a significantly reduced rate. In April 2010, Waldaschaff Automotive GmbH executed a temporary lease under which monthly rent is unchanged but real estate expenses are now reimbursed by the tenant. Waldaschaff Automotive GmbH contributed $0.7 million of our lease revenue for the year ended December 31, 2010, inclusive of amounts attributable to noncontrolling interests of $0.2 million.

Our leases may permit tenants to purchase a property at a predetermined price, which could limit our realization of any appreciation.

Based upon our advisor’s past experience, we expect that a significant number of our future leases will include provisions under which the tenant will have a right to purchase the property it leases. The purchase price may be a fixed price or it may be based on a formula or the market value at the time of exercise. If a tenant exercises its right to purchase the property and the property’s market value has increased beyond that price, we would be limited in fully realizing the appreciation on that property. Additionally, if the price at which the tenant can purchase the property is less than our purchase price or carrying value (for example, where the purchase price is based on an appraised value), we may incur a loss.

Highly leveraged tenants may have a higher possibility of filing for bankruptcy or insolvency.

Highly leveraged tenants that experience downturns in their operating results due to adverse changes to their business or economic conditions may have a higher possibility of filing for bankruptcy or insolvency. In bankruptcy or insolvency, a tenant may have the option of vacating a property instead of paying rent. Until such a property is released from bankruptcy, our revenues may be reduced and could cause us to reduce distributions to shareholders.

The credit profiles of our tenants may create a higher risk of lease defaults and therefore lower revenues.

Generally, no credit rating agencies evaluate or rank the debt or the credit risk of many of our tenants, as we seek tenants that we believe will have stable or improving credit profiles that have not been recognized by the traditional credit market. Our long-term leases with certain of these tenants may therefore pose a higher risk of default than would long-term leases with tenants whose credit is rated highly by a rating agency.

CPA^®:17 2010 10-K — 22

We may incur costs to finish build-to-suit properties.

We may acquire undeveloped land or partially developed buildings for the purpose of owning to-be-built facilities for a prospective tenant. The primary risks of a build-to-suit project are potential for failing to meet an agreed-upon delivery schedule and cost-overruns, which may among other things, cause the total project costs to exceed the original appraisal. In some cases, the prospective tenant will bear these risks. However, in other instances we may be required to bear these risks, which means that we may have to advance funds to cover cost-overruns that we would not be able to recover through increased rent payments or that we may incur schedule delays that delay commencement of rent. We will attempt to minimize these risks through guaranteed maximum price contracts, review of contractor financials and completed plans and specifications prior to commencement of construction. The incurrence of the costs described above or any non-occupancy by the tenant upon completion may reduce the project’s and our portfolio’s returns or result in losses to us.

We are subject, in part, to the risks of real estate ownership, which could reduce the value of our properties.

Our performance and asset value is, in part, subject to risks incident to the ownership and operation of real estate, including:

•

changes in the general economic climate;

•

changes in local conditions such as an oversupply of space or reduction in demand for real estate;

•

changes in interest rates and the availability of financing; and

•

changes in laws and governmental regulations, including those governing real estate usage, zoning and taxes.

We may have difficulty selling or re-leasing our properties and this lack of liquidity may limit our ability to quickly change our portfolio in response to changes in economic or other conditions.

Real estate investments generally have less liquidity compared to other financial assets and this lack of liquidity may limit our ability to quickly change our portfolio in response to changes in economic or other conditions. The leases we may enter into or acquire may be for properties that are specially suited to the particular needs of our tenant. With these properties, if the current lease is terminated or not renewed, we may be required to renovate the property or to make rent concessions in order to lease the property to another tenant. In addition, if we are forced to sell the property, we may have difficulty selling it to a party other than the tenant due to the special purpose for which the property may have been designed. These and other limitations may affect our ability to sell properties without adversely affecting returns to our shareholders.

Potential liability for environmental matters could adversely affect our financial condition.

We expect to invest in real properties historically used for industrial, manufacturing, and commercial purposes. We therefore may own properties that have known or potential environmental contamination as a result of historical or ongoing operations. Buildings and structures on the properties we purchase may have known or suspected asbestos-containing building materials. We may invest in properties located in countries that have adopted laws or observe environmental management standards that are less stringent than those generally followed in the U.S., which may pose a greater risk that releases of hazardous or toxic substances have occurred to the environment. Leasing properties to tenants that engage in these activities, and owning properties historically and currently used for industrial, manufacturing, and commercial purposes, will cause us to be subject to the risk of liabilities under environmental laws. Some of these laws could impose the following on us:

•

Responsibility and liability for the costs of investigation, removal or remediation of hazardous or toxic substances released on or from our real property, generally without regard to our knowledge of, or responsibility for, the presence of these contaminants.

•

Liability for claims by third parties based on damages to natural resources or property, personal injuries, or costs of removal or remediation of hazardous or toxic substances in, on, or migrating from our property.

•

Responsibility for managing asbestos-containing building materials, and third-party claims for exposure to those materials.

Our costs of investigation, remediation or removal of hazardous or toxic substances, or for third-party claims for damages, may be substantial. The presence of hazardous or toxic substances on one of our properties, or the failure to properly remediate a contaminated property, could give rise to a lien in favor of the government for costs it may incur to address the contamination, or otherwise adversely affect our ability to sell or lease the property or to borrow using the property as collateral. In addition, environmental liabilities, or costs or operating limitations imposed on a tenant to comply with environmental laws, could affect its ability to make rental payments to us.

CPA^®:17 2010 10-K — 23

Liability for uninsured losses could adversely affect our financial condition.

Losses from disaster-type occurrences (such as wars, terrorist activities, floods or earthquakes) may be either uninsurable or not insurable on economically viable terms. Should an uninsured loss or a loss in excess of the limits of our insurance occur, we could lose our capital investment and/or anticipated profits and cash flow from one or more investments, which in turn could cause the value of the shares and distributions to our stockholders to be reduced.

We face competition for the investments we make.

In raising funds for investment, we face competition from other funds with similar investment objectives that seek to raise funds from investors through publicly registered, non-traded funds, publicly-traded funds and private funds. This competition, as well as any change in the attractiveness to investors of an investment in the types of assets held by us, relative to other types of investments, could adversely affect our ability to raise funds for future investments. We face competition for the acquisition of commercial properties and real estate-related assets from insurance companies, credit companies, pension funds, private individuals, investment companies and other REITs. We also face competition from institutions that provide or arrange for other types of commercial financing through private or public offerings of equity or debt or traditional bank financings. These institutions may accept greater risk or lower returns, allowing them to offer more attractive terms to prospective tenants. In addition, our advisor’s evaluation of the acceptability of rates of return on our behalf will be affected by our relative cost of capital. Thus, to the extent our fee structure and cost of fundraising is higher than our competitors, we may be limited in the amount of new acquisitions we are able to make.

Valuations that we obtain may include leases in place on the property being appraised, and if the leases terminate, the value of the property may become significantly lower.

The valuations that we obtain on our properties may be based on the value of the properties when the properties are leased. If the leases on the properties terminate, the value of the properties may fall significantly below the appraised value.

The mortgage loans in which we may invest and the mortgage loans underlying the commercial mortgage-backed securities in which we may invest will be subject to delinquency, foreclosure and loss, which could result in losses to us.

The ability of a borrower to repay a loan secured by an income-producing property typically is dependent primarily upon the successful operation of the property rather than upon the existence of independent income or assets of the borrower. If the net operating income of the property is reduced, the borrower’s ability to repay the loan may be impaired. Net operating income of an income-producing property can be affected by the risks particular to real property described above, as well as, among other things:

•

tenant mix;

•

success of tenant businesses;

•

property management decisions;

•

property location and condition;

•

competition from comparable types of properties;

•

changes in specific industry segments;

•

declines in regional or local real estate values, or rental or occupancy rates; and

•

increases in interest rates, real estate tax rates and other operating expenses.

In the event of any default under a mortgage loan (or any financing lease or net lease that is recharacterized as a mortgage loan) held directly by us, we will bear a risk of loss of principal to the extent of any deficiency between the value of the collateral and the principal and accrued interest of the mortgage loan, which could have a material adverse effect on our ability to achieve our investment objectives, including, without limitation, diversification of our commercial real estate properties portfolio by property type and location, moderate financial leverage, low to moderate operating risk and an attractive level of current income. In the event of the bankruptcy of a mortgage loan borrower (or any tenant under a financing lease or a net lease that is recharacterized as a mortgage loan), the mortgage loan (or any financing lease or net lease that is recharacterized as a mortgage loan) to that borrower will be

CPA^®:17 2010 10-K — 24

deemed to be secured only to the extent of the value of the underlying collateral at the time of bankruptcy (as determined by the bankruptcy court), and the lien securing the mortgage loan will be subject to the avoidance powers of the bankruptcy trustee or debtor-in-possession to the extent the lien is unenforceable under state law. Foreclosure of a mortgage loan (or any financing lease or net lease that is recharacterized as a mortgage loan) can be an expensive and lengthy process that could have a substantial negative effect on our anticipated return on the foreclosed mortgage loan.

The B Notes, C Notes, subordinate mortgage notes, mezzanine loans and participation interests in mortgage and mezzanine loans in which we may invest may be subject to risks relating to the structure and terms of the transactions, as well as subordination in bankruptcy, and there may not be sufficient funds or assets remaining to satisfy the subordinate notes in which we may have invested, which may result in losses to us.

We may invest in B Notes, C Notes, subordinate mortgage notes, mezzanine loans and participation interests in mortgage and mezzanine loans, to the extent consistent with our investment guidelines and the rules applicable to REITs. These investments are subordinate to first mortgages on commercial real estate properties and are secured by subordinate rights to the commercial real estate properties or by equity interests in the commercial entity. If a borrower defaults or declares bankruptcy, after senior obligations are met, there may not be sufficient funds or assets remaining to satisfy the subordinate notes in which we may have invested. Because each transaction is privately negotiated, B Notes, C Notes and subordinate mortgage notes can vary in their structural characteristics and lender rights. Our rights to control the default or bankruptcy process following a default will vary from transaction to transaction. The subordinate real estate-related debt in which we intend to invest may not give us the right to demand foreclosure. Furthermore, the presence of intercreditor agreements may limit our ability to amend our loan documents, assign our loans, accept prepayments, exercise our remedies and control decisions made in bankruptcy proceedings relating to borrowers. Bankruptcy and borrower litigation can significantly increase the time needed for us to acquire underlying collateral in the event of a default, during which time the collateral may decline in value. In addition, there are significant costs and delays associated with the foreclosure process. The Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) has issued restrictive guidance as to when a loan secured by equity in an entity will be treated as a qualifying REIT asset. Failure to comply with such guidance could jeopardize our ability to continue to qualify as a REIT.

Interest rate fluctuations and changes in prepayment rates could reduce our ability to generate income on our investments in commercial mortgage loans.

The yield on our investments in commercial mortgage loans may be sensitive to changes in prevailing interest rates and changes in prepayment rates. Therefore, changes in interest rates may affect our net interest income, which is the difference between the interest income we earn on our interest-earning investments and the interest expense we incur in financing these investments. We will often price loans at a spread to either U.S. Treasury obligations, swaps or the London Inter-Bank Offered Rate, or LIBOR. A decrease in these indexes may lower the yield on our investments. Conversely, if these indexes rise materially, borrowers may become delinquent or default on the high-leverage loans we occasionally target. As discussed below with respect to mortgage loans underlying commercial mortgage-backed securities, when a borrower prepays a mortgage loan more quickly than we expect, our expected return on the investment generally will be adversely affected.

An increase in prepayment rates of the mortgage loans underlying our CMBS investments may adversely affect the profitability of our investment in these securities.

The CMBS investments we may acquire will be secured by pools of mortgage loans. When we acquire CMBS, we anticipate that the underlying mortgage loans will be prepaid at a projected rate generating an expected yield. When borrowers prepay their mortgage loans more quickly than we expect, it results in redemptions that are earlier than expected on the CMBS, and this may adversely affect the expected returns on our investments. Prepayment rates generally increase when interest rates fall and decrease when interest rates rise, but changes in prepayment rates are difficult to predict. Prepayment rates also may be affected by conditions in the housing and financial markets, general economic conditions and the relative interest rates on fixed-rate and adjustable-rate mortgage loans.

As the holder of CMBS, a portion of our investment principal will be returned to us if and when the underlying mortgage loans are prepaid. In order to continue to earn a return on this returned principal, we must reinvest it in other mortgage-backed securities or other investments. If interest rates are falling, however, we may earn a lower return on the new investment as compared to the original CMBS.

We may invest in subordinate commercial mortgage-backed securities, which are subject to a greater risk of loss than more senior securities.

We may invest in a variety of subordinate commercial mortgage-backed securities, to the extent consistent with our investment guidelines and the rules applicable to REITs. The ability of a borrower to make payments on a loan underlying these securities is dependent primarily upon the successful operation of the property rather than upon the existence of independent income or assets of the borrower. In the event of default and the exhaustion of any equity support, reserve fund, letter of credit and any classes of securities junior to those in which we invest, we may not be able to recover all of our investment in the securities we purchase.

CPA^®:17 2010 10-K — 25

Expenses of enforcing the underlying mortgage loans (including litigation expenses), expenses of protecting the properties securing the mortgage loans and the lien on the mortgaged properties and, if such expenses are advanced by the servicer of the mortgage loans, interest on such advances will also be allocated to junior securities prior to allocation to more senior classes of securities issued in the securitization. Prior to the reduction of distributions to more senior securities, distributions to the junior securities may also be reduced by payments of compensation to any servicer engaged to enforce a defaulted mortgage loan. Such expenses and servicing compensation may be substantial and consequently, in the event of a default or loss on one or more mortgage loans contained in a securitization, we may not recover our investment.

In times of economic distress, such as the recent downturn, the risk of loss on our investments in subordinated commercial mortgage-backed securities could increase. In 2009, we incurred a significant impairment charge on our CMBS investments. The prices of lower credit-quality securities are generally less sensitive to interest rate changes than more highly rated investments but are more sensitive to adverse economic downturns or individual property developments. An economic downturn or a projection of an economic downturn could cause a decline in the price of lower credit quality securities because the ability of obligors of mortgage loans underlying mortgage-backed securities to make principal and interest payments may be impaired. In such event, existing credit support to a securitized structure may be insufficient to protect us against loss of our principal on these securities.

Investments in B Notes and C Notes may be subject to additional risks relating to the privately negotiated structure and terms of the transaction, which may result in losses to us.

We may invest in B Notes and C Notes. A B Note is a mortgage loan typically (i) secured by a first mortgage on a single large commercial property or group of related properties and (ii) subordinated to an A Note secured by the same first mortgage on the same collateral. As a result, if a borrower defaults, there may not be sufficient funds remaining for B Note owners after payment to the A Note owners. B Notes, including C Notes, which are junior to B Notes, reflect similar credit risks to comparably rated CMBS. However, since each transaction is privately negotiated, B Notes can vary in their structural characteristics and risks. For example, the rights of holders of B Notes to control the process following a borrower default may be limited in certain investments. We cannot predict the terms of each B Note investment. Further, B Notes typically are secured by a single property and so reflect the increased risks associated with a single property compared to a pool of properties. B Notes also are less liquid than CMBS, and thus we may be unable to dispose of underperforming or non-performing investments. The higher risks associated with our subordinate position in B Note investments could subject us to increased risk of losses.

Investment in non-conforming and non-investment grade loans may involve increased risk of loss.

We may acquire or originate certain loans that do not conform to conventional loan criteria applied by traditional lenders and are not rated or are rated as non-investment grade (for example, for investments rated by Moody’s, ratings lower than Baa3, and for Standard & Poor’s, BBB- or below). The non-investment grade ratings for these loans typically result from the overall leverage of the loans, the lack of a strong operating history for the properties underlying the loans, the borrowers’ credit history, the properties’ underlying cash flow or other factors. As a result, these loans we may originate or acquire have a higher risk of default and loss than conventional loans. Any loss we incur may reduce distributions to our shareholders. There are no limits on the percentage of unrated or non-investment grade assets we may hold in our portfolio.

Investments in mezzanine loans involve greater risks of loss than senior loans secured by income producing properties.

We may invest in mezzanine loans. Investments in mezzanine loans take the form of subordinated loans secured by second mortgages on the underlying property or loans secured by a pledge of the ownership interests in the entity that directly or indirectly owns the property. These types of investments involve a higher degree of risk than a senior mortgage loan because the investment may become unsecured as a result of foreclosure by the senior lender. In the event of a bankruptcy of the entity providing the pledge of its ownership interests as security, we may not have full recourse to the assets of the property owning entity, or the assets of the entity may not be sufficient to satisfy our mezzanine loan. If a borrower defaults on our mezzanine loan or debt senior to our loan, or in the event of a borrower bankruptcy, our mezzanine loan will be satisfied only after the senior debt is paid in full. As a result, we may not recover some or all of our investment, which could result in losses. In addition, mezzanine loans may have higher loan to value ratios than conventional mortgage loans, resulting in less equity in the property and increasing the risk of loss of principal.

CPA^®:17 2010 10-K — 26

Our investments in debt securities are subject to specific risks relating to the particular issuer of securities and to the general risks of investing in subordinated real estate securities.

Our investments in debt securities involve special risks. REITs generally are required to invest substantially in real estate or real estate-related assets and are subject to the inherent risks associated with real estate-related investments discussed in this Report. Our investments in debt are subject to the risks described above with respect to mortgage loans and mortgage-backed securities and similar risks, including:

•

risks of delinquency and foreclosure, and risks of loss in the event thereof;

•

the dependence upon the successful operation of and net income from real property;

•

risks generally incident to interests in real property; and

•

risk that may be presented by the type and use of a particular commercial property.

Debt securities are generally unsecured and may also be subordinated to other obligations of the issuer. We may also invest in debt securities that are rated below investment grade. As a result, investment in debt securities are also subject to risks of:

•

limited liquidity in the secondary trading market;

•

substantial market price volatility resulting from changes in prevailing interest rates;

•

subordination to the prior claims of banks and other senior lenders to the issuer;

•

the operation of mandatory sinking fund or call/redemption provisions during periods of declining interest rates that could cause the issuer to reinvest premature redemption proceeds in lower yielding assets;

•

the possibility that earnings of the debt security issuer may be insufficient to meet its debt service; and

•

the declining creditworthiness and potential for insolvency of the issuer of such debt securities during periods of rising interest rates and economic downturn.

The risks may adversely affect the value of outstanding debt securities and the ability of the issuers thereof to repay principal and interest.

Investments in securities of REITs, real estate operating companies and companies with significant real estate assets will expose us to many of the same general risks associated with direct real property ownership.

Investments we may make in other REITs, real estate operating companies and companies with significant real estate assets, directly or indirectly through other real estate funds, will be subject to many of the same general risks associated with direct real property ownership. In particular, equity REITs may be affected by changes in the value of the underlying property owned by us, while mortgage REITs may be affected by the quality of any credit extended. Since REIT investments, however, are securities, they also may be exposed to market risk and price volatility due to changes in financial market conditions and changes as discussed below.

The value of the equity securities of companies engaged in real estate activities that we may invest in may be volatile and may decline.

The value of equity securities of companies engaged in real estate activities, including those of REITs, fluctuates in response to issuer, political, market and economic developments. In the short term, equity prices can fluctuate dramatically in response to these developments. Different parts of the market and different types of equity securities can react differently to these developments and they can affect a single issuer, multiple issuers within an industry or economic sector or geographic region or the market as a whole. These fluctuations in value could result in significant gains or losses being reported in our financial statements because we will be required to mark such investments to market periodically.

CPA^®:17 2010 10-K — 27

The real estate industry is sensitive to economic downturns. The value of securities of companies engaged in real estate activities can be adversely affected by changes in real estate values and rental income, property taxes, interest rates, and tax and regulatory requirements. In addition, the value of a REIT’s equity securities can depend on the structure and amount of cash flow generated by the REIT. It is possible that our investments in securities may decline in value even though the obligor on the securities is not in default of its obligations to us.

The lack of an active public trading market for our shares combined with the limit on the number of our shares a person may own may discourage a takeover and make it difficult for shareholders to sell shares quickly.

There is no active public trading market for our shares, and we do not expect there ever will be one. Our charter also prohibits the ownership by one person or affiliated group of more than 9.8% in value of our stock or more than 9.8% in value or number, whichever is more restrictive, of our outstanding shares of common stock, unless exempted by our board of directors, to assist us in meeting the REIT qualification rules, among other things. This limit on the number of our shares a person may own may discourage a change of control of us and may inhibit individuals or large investors from desiring to purchase your shares by making a tender offer for your shares through offers financially attractive to you. Moreover, you should not rely on our redemption plan as a method to sell shares promptly because our redemption plan includes numerous restrictions that limit your ability to sell your shares to us, and our board of directors may amend, suspend or terminate our redemption plan, without giving you advance notice. In particular, the redemption plan provides that we may redeem shares only if we have sufficient funds available for redemption and to the extent the total number of shares for which redemption is requested in any quarter, together with the aggregate number of shares redeemed in the preceding three fiscal quarters, does not exceed five percent of the total number of our shares outstanding as of the last day of the immediately preceding fiscal quarter. Therefore, it will be difficult for you to sell your shares promptly or at all. In addition, the price received for any shares sold prior to a liquidity event is likely to be less than the proportionate value of the real estate we own. Investor suitability standards imposed by certain states may also make it more difficult to sell your shares to someone in those states. As a result, our shares should be purchased as a long-term investment only.

Failing to continue to qualify as a REIT would adversely affect our operations and ability to make distributions.

If we fail to continue to qualify as a REIT in any taxable year, we would be subject to U.S. federal income tax on our net taxable income at corporate rates. In addition, we would generally be disqualified from treatment as a REIT for the four taxable years following the year we lost our REIT qualification. Losing our REIT qualification would reduce our net earnings available for investment or distribution to shareholders because of the additional tax liability, and we would no longer be required to make distributions. We might be required to borrow funds or liquidate some investments in order to pay the applicable tax. Qualification as a REIT involves the application of highly technical and complex Internal Revenue Code provisions for which there are only limited judicial and administrative interpretations. The determination of various factual matters and circumstances not entirely within our control may affect our ability to qualify as a REIT. In order to qualify as a REIT, we must satisfy a number of requirements regarding the composition of our assets and the sources of our gross income. Also, we must make distributions to our shareholders aggregating annually at least 90% of our REIT net taxable income, excluding net capital gains. Because we intend to make investments in foreign real property, we are subject to foreign currency gains and losses. Foreign currency gains may or may not be taken into account for purposes of the REIT income requirements. In addition, legislation, new regulations, administrative interpretations or court decisions may adversely affect our investors, our ability to qualify as a REIT for U.S. federal income tax purposes or the desirability of an investment in a REIT relative to other investments.

The IRS may treat sale-leaseback transactions as loans, which could jeopardize our REIT qualification.

The IRS may take the position that specific sale-leaseback transactions we will treat as true leases are not true leases for U.S. federal income tax purposes but are, instead, financing arrangements or loans. If a sale-leaseback transaction were so recharacterized, we might fail to satisfy the qualification requirements applicable to REITs.

Dividends payable by REITs generally do not qualify for reduced U.S. federal income tax rates because qualifying REITs do not pay U.S. federal income tax on their undistributed net income.

The maximum U.S. federal income tax rate for dividends payable by domestic corporations to taxable U.S. shareholders is 15% (through 2012 under current law). Dividends payable by REITs, however, are generally not eligible for the reduced rates, except to the extent that they are attributable to dividends paid by a taxable REIT subsidiary or a C corporation, or relate to certain other activities. This is because qualifying REITs receive an entity level tax benefit from not having to pay U.S. federal income tax on their

CPA^®:17 2010 10-K — 28

undistributed net income. As a result, the more favorable rates applicable to regular corporate dividends could cause shareholders who are individuals to perceive investments in REITs to be relatively less attractive than investments in the stocks of non-REIT corporations that pay dividends, which could adversely affect the value of the stock of REITs, including our common stock. In addition, the relative attractiveness of real estate in general may be adversely affected by the reduced U.S. federal income tax rates applicable to corporate dividends, which could negatively affect the value of our properties.

Our board of directors may revoke our REIT election without shareholder approval, which may cause adverse consequences to our shareholders.

Our organizational documents permit our board of directors to revoke or otherwise terminate our REIT election, without the approval of our shareholders, if the board determines that it is not in our best interest to qualify as a REIT. In such a case, we would become subject to U.S. federal income tax on our net taxable income and we would no longer be required to distribute most of our net taxable income to our shareholders, which may have adverse consequences on the total return to our shareholders.

Conflicts of interest may arise between holders of our common shares and holders of partnership interests in our operating partnership.

Our directors and officers have duties to us and to our shareholders under Maryland law in connection with their management of us. At the same time, we as general partner will have fiduciary duties under Delaware law to our operating partnership and to the limited partners in connection with the management of our operating partnership. Our duties as general partner of our operating partnership and its partners may come into conflict with the duties of our directors and officers to us and our shareholders.

Under Delaware law, a general partner of a Delaware limited partnership owes its limited partners the duties of good faith and fair dealing. Other duties, including fiduciary duties, may be modified or eliminated in the partnership’s partnership agreement. The partnership agreement of our operating partnership provides that, for so long as we own a controlling interest in our operating partnership, any conflict that cannot be resolved in a manner not adverse to either our shareholders or the limited partners will be resolved in favor of our shareholders.

Additionally, the partnership agreement expressly limits our liability by providing that we and our officers, directors, employees and designees will not be liable or accountable to our operating partnership for losses sustained, liabilities incurred or benefits not derived if we or our officers, directors, agents, employees or designees, as the case may be, acted in good faith. In addition, our operating partnership is required to indemnify us and our officers, directors, agents, employees and designees to the extent permitted by applicable law from and against any and all claims arising from operations of our operating partnership, unless it is established that: (1) the act or omission was committed in bad faith, was fraudulent or was the result of active and deliberate dishonesty; (2) the indemnified party actually received an improper personal benefit in money, property or services; or (3) in the case of a criminal proceeding, the indemnified person had reasonable cause to believe that the act or omission was unlawful. These limitations on liability do not supersede the indemnification provisions of our charter.

The provisions of Delaware law that allow the fiduciary duties of a general partner to be modified by a partnership agreement have not been tested in a court of law, and we have not obtained an opinion of counsel covering the provisions set forth in the partnership agreement that purport to waive or restrict our fiduciary duties.

Maryland law could restrict change in control, which could have the effect of inhibiting a change in control even if a change in control were in our shareholders’ interest.

Provisions of Maryland law applicable to us prohibit business combinations with:

•

any person who beneficially owns 10% or more of the voting power of our outstanding voting shares, referred to as an interested shareholder;

•

an affiliate who, at any time within the two-year period prior to the date in question, was the beneficial owner of 10% or more of the voting power of our outstanding shares, also referred to as an interested shareholder; or

•

an affiliate of an interested shareholder.

CPA^®:17 2010 10-K — 29

These prohibitions last for five years after the most recent date on which the interested shareholder became an interested shareholder. Thereafter, any business combination must be recommended by our board of directors and approved by the affirmative vote of at least 80% of the votes entitled to be cast by holders of our outstanding voting shares and two-thirds of the votes entitled to be cast by holders of our voting shares other than voting shares held by the interested shareholder or by an affiliate or associate of the interested shareholder. These requirements could have the effect of inhibiting a change in control even if a change in control were in our shareholders’ interest. These provisions of Maryland law do not apply, however, to business combinations that are approved or exempted by our board of directors prior to the time that someone becomes an interested shareholder. In addition, a person is not an interested shareholder if the board of directors approved in advance the transaction by which he or she otherwise would have become an interested shareholder. However, in approving a transaction, the board of directors may provide that its approval is subject to compliance, at or after the time of approval, with any terms and conditions determined by the board.

Our charter permits our board of directors to issue stock with terms that may subordinate the rights of the holders of our current common stock or discourage a third-party from acquiring us.

Our board of directors may determine that it is in our best interest to classify or reclassify any unissued stock and establish the preferences, conversion or other rights, voting powers, restrictions, limitations as to dividends and other distributions, qualifications, and terms or conditions of redemption of any such stock. Thus, our board of directors could authorize the issuance of such stock with terms and conditions that could subordinate the rights of the holders of our common stock or have the effect of delaying, deferring or preventing a change in control of us, including an extraordinary transaction (such as a merger, tender offer or sale of all or substantially all of our assets) that might provide a premium price for holders of our common stock. However, the issuance of preferred stock must also be approved by a majority of independent directors not otherwise interested in the transaction, who will have access at our expense to our legal counsel or to independent legal counsel. In addition, the board of directors, with the approval of a majority of the entire board and without any action by the shareholders, may amend our charter from time to time to increase or decrease the aggregate number of shares or the number of shares of any class or series that we have authority to issue. If our board of directors determines to take any such action, it will do so in accordance with the duties it owes to holders of our common stock.

Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments.

None.

Item 2. Properties.

Our principal corporate offices are located at 50 Rockefeller Plaza, New York, NY 10020. The advisor also has its primary international investment offices located in London and Amsterdam. The advisor also has office space domestically in Dallas, Texas and internationally in Shanghai. The advisor leases all of these offices and believes these leases are suitable for our operations for the foreseeable future.

See Item 1, Business — Our Portfolio for a discussion of the properties we hold for rental operations and Part II, Item 8, Financial Statements and Supplemental Data — Schedule III — Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation for a detailed listing of such properties.

Item 3. Legal Proceedings.

Various claims and lawsuits arising in the normal course of business are pending against us. The results of these proceedings are not expected to have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position or results of operations.

Item 4. Removed and Reserved.

CPA^®:17 2010 10-K — 30

PART II

Item 5.		Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities.

There is no active public trading market for our shares. At March 14, 2011, there were 50,741 holders of our shares.

Distributions

We are required to distribute annually at least 90% of our distributable REIT net taxable income to maintain our status as a REIT. Quarterly distributions declared for the past two years are as follows:

		2010				2009
First quarter		$	0.1600			$	0.1562
Second quarter			0.1600				0.1575
Third quarter			0.1600				0.1587
Fourth quarter			0.1600				0.1600
		$	0.6400			$	0.6324

Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities

(a)

For the three months ended December 31, 2010, we issued 141,715 restricted shares of our common stock to the advisor as consideration for asset management fees. These shares were issued at $10.00 per share, which represents our initial offering price. Since none of these transactions were considered to have involved a “public offering” within the meaning of Section 4(2) of the Securities Act, the shares issued were deemed to be exempt from registration. In acquiring our shares, the advisor represented that such interests were being acquired by it for the purposes of investment and not with a view to the distribution thereof.

(b)

We intend to use the net proceeds of our offering to invest in a diversified portfolio of income-producing commercial properties and other real estate related assets. The use of proceeds from our offering of common stock, which commenced in December 2007 pursuant to a registration statement (No. 333-140842) that was declared effective in November 2007, is as follows at December 31, 2010 (in thousands except share amounts):

Shares registered			200,000,000
Aggregate price of offering amount registered		$	2,000,000
Shares sold (a)			137,550,626
Aggregated offering price of amount sold		$	1,373,412
Direct or indirect payments to directors, officers, general partners of the issuer or their associates; to persons owning ten percent or more of any class of equity securities of the issuer; and to affiliates of the issuer			(137,439	)
Direct or indirect payments to others			(12,242	)
Net offering proceeds to the issuer after deducting expenses			1,223,731
Purchases of real estate, equity investments in real estate and real estate related assets, net of mortgage financing			(949,470	)
Temporary investments in cash and cash equivalents		$	274,261

CPA^®:17 2010 10-K — 31

Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

Maximum number (or

Total number of shares

approximate dollar value)

purchased as part of

of shares that may yet be

Total number of

Average price

publicly announced

purchased under the

2010 Period

shares purchased(a)

paid per share

plans or programs(a)

plans or programs(a)

October

N/A

N/A

November

N/A

N/A

December

174,023

$

9.30

N/A

N/A

Total

174,023

Item 6.		Selected Financial Data.

The following selected financial data should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and related notes in Item 8 (in thousands, except per share data):

		Years ended December 31,												Period ended
		2010				2009				2008				12/31/2007(a)
Operating Data
Total revenues		$	99,522			$	50,346			$	9,684			$	—
Net income (loss)			45,787				2,180				(1,650	)			(106	)
Add: Net (income) loss attributable to noncontrolling interests			(15,333	)			(9,881	)			403				—
Net income (loss) attributable to CPA®17 — Global shareholders (b)			30,454				(7,701	)			(1,247	)			(106	)
Income (loss) per share:
Net income (loss) attributable to CPA®:17 — Global shareholders			0.27				(0.14	)			(0.07	)			(4.76	)
Cash distributions declared per share			0.6400				0.6324				0.5578				0.0792
Balance Sheet Data
Total assets		$	1,988,255			$	1,067,872			$	479,072			$	2,944
Net investments in real estate (c)			1,426,907				698,332				273,314				8
Long-term obligations (d)			687,297				308,830				137,181				—
Other Information
Cash provided by operating activities		$	67,975			$	32,240			$	4,443			$	(17	)
Cash distributions paid			60,937				27,193				5,196				—
Payment of mortgage principal (e)			6,541				4,494				540				—

CPA^®:17 2010 10-K — 32

Item 7.		Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

Management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations (“MD&A”) is intended to provide the reader with information that will assist in understanding our financial statements and the reasons for changes in certain key components of our financial statements from period to period. MD&A also provides the reader with our perspective on our financial position and liquidity, as well as certain other factors that may affect our future results.

Business Overview

As described in more detail in Item 1 of this Report, we are a publicly owned, non-listed REIT that invests primarily in commercial properties leased to companies domestically and internationally. As a REIT, we are not subject to U.S. federal income taxation as long as we satisfy certain requirements, principally relating to the nature of our income, the level of our distributions and other factors. We earn revenue principally by leasing the properties we own to single corporate tenants, on a triple-net lease basis, which requires the tenant to pay substantially all of the costs associated with operating and maintaining the property. Revenue is subject to fluctuation because of the timing of new lease transactions, lease terminations, lease expirations, contractual rent adjustments, tenant defaults and sales of properties. We were formed in 2007 and are managed by the advisor.

Financial Highlights
(in thousands)

		Years ended December 31,
		2010				2009				2008
Total revenues		$	99,522			$	50,346			$	9,684
Net income (loss) attributable to CPA®:17 — Global shareholders			30,454				(7,701	)			(1,247	)
Cash flow provided by operating activities			67,975				32,240				4,443
Distributions paid			60,937				27,193				5,196
Supplemental financial measures:
Funds from operations — as adjusted (AFFO)			42,231				17,181				4,252
Adjusted cash flow from operating activities			48,099				20,286				3,340

We consider the performance metrics listed above, including certain supplemental metrics that are not defined by GAAP (“non-GAAP”) such as Funds from operations — as adjusted and Adjusted cash flow from operating activities, to be important measures in the evaluation of our results of operations, liquidity and capital resources. We evaluate our results of operations with a primary focus on the ability to generate cash flow necessary to meet our objectives of funding distributions to shareholders. Please see Supplemental Financial Measures below for our definition of these measures and reconciliations to their most directly comparable GAAP measure.

Total revenues and cash flow provided by operating activities increased in 2010 as compared to 2009, reflecting the results of our investment activity during 2010 and 2009.

Net income attributable to CPA^®:17 — Global shareholders for the year ended December 31, 2010 reflected higher lease revenue and a reduction in the level of impairment charges recognized as compared to 2009. For 2009, net loss attributable to CPA^®:17 — Global shareholders reflected the recognition of impairment charges totaling $26.8 million on our CMBS and real estate investments, inclusive of amounts attributable to noncontrolling interests of $2.8 million (Notes 7 and 11).

Our AFFO supplemental measure increased for the year ended December 31, 2010 as compared to 2009, primarily as a result of our investment activity during 2009 and 2010. For the year ended December 31, 2010 as compared to 2009, our adjusted cash flow from operating activities supplemental measure reflected increased cash flow, as described above.

CPA^®:17 2010 10-K — 33

Current Trends

We are impacted by macro-economic environmental factors, the capital markets, and general conditions in the commercial real estate market, both in the U.S. and globally. As of the date of this Report, we have seen signs of modest improvement in the global economy following the significant distress experienced in 2008 and 2009. Our experience during 2010 reflects increased investment volume over the prior year, as well as an improved financing and fundraising environment. While these factors reflect favorably on our business, the economic recovery remains weak, and our business remains dependent on the speed and strength of the recovery, which cannot be predicted at this time. Nevertheless, as of the date of this Report, the impact of current financial and economic trends on our business, and our response to those trends, is presented below.

Fundraising

Fundraising trends for non-listed REITs generally reflect an increase in average monthly volume during 2010 compared to 2009. Additionally, the number of offerings has increased over 2009 levels. Consequently, there has been an increase in the competition for investment dollars.

While fundraising trends are difficult to predict, our recent fundraising continues to be strong. We raised $593.1 million for our initial public offering during 2010 and, through the date of this Report, have raised more than $1.5 billion since beginning fundraising in December 2007. We have made a concerted effort to broaden our distribution channels and are seeing a greater portion of our fundraising come from an expanded network of broker-dealers as a result of these efforts.

In October 2010, we filed a registration statement with the SEC for a possible continuous public offering of up to an additional $1.0 billion of common stock, which we currently expect will commence after our initial public offering terminates. There can be no assurance that we will actually commence the follow-on offering or successfully sell the full number of shares registered. Our initial public offering will terminate on the earlier of the date on which the registration statement for the follow-on offering becomes effective or May 2, 2011.

Capital Markets

We have recently seen evidence of a gradual improvement in capital markets conditions, including new issuances of CMBS debt. Capital inflows to both commercial real estate debt and equity markets have helped increase the availability of mortgage financing and asset prices have begun to recover from their credit crisis lows. Over the past few quarters, there has been continued improvement in the availability of financing; however, lenders remain cautious and continue to employ more conservative underwriting standards. We have seen commercial real estate capitalization rates begin to narrow from credit crisis highs, especially for higher-quality assets or assets leased to tenants with strong credit. The improvement in financing conditions combined with a stabilization of prices for high quality assets has helped to increase transaction activity, and our market has seen an increase in competition from both public and private investors.

Investment Opportunities

Our ability to complete investments fluctuates based on the pricing and availability of transactions and the pricing and availability of financing, among other factors.

As a result of the recent improving economic conditions and increasing seller optimism, we have seen an increased number of investment opportunities that we believe will allow us to enter into transactions on favorable terms. Although capitalization rates have remained compressed over the past few quarters compared to their credit crisis highs, we believe that the investment environment remains attractive. We believe that the significant amount of debt that remains outstanding in the marketplace, which will need to be refinanced over the next several years, will provide attractive investment opportunities for net lease investors such as ourselves. To the extent that these trends continue, we believe that our investment volume will benefit. However, we have recently seen an increasing level of competition for investments, both domestically and internationally, and further capital inflows into the marketplace could put additional pressure on the returns that we can generate from our investments and our willingness and ability to execute transactions.

We entered into investments totaling approximately $1.0 billion during 2010, representing an increase of $665.5 million over the prior year, and based on current conditions we expect that in 2011 we will be able to continue to take advantage of the investment opportunities we are seeing in both the U.S. and Europe. Investment volume reflects international investments of 45% (on a pro rata basis) during 2010. We currently expect that international transactions will continue to form a significant portion of our investments, although the relative portion of international investments in any given period will vary.

CPA^®:17 2010 10-K — 34

Financing Conditions

We have recently seen a gradual improvement in both the credit and real estate financing markets. During 2010, we saw an increase in the number of lenders for both domestic and international investments as market conditions improved compared to prior years. However, during the fourth quarter of 2010, the cost of debt rose, but we anticipate that this may be recoverable either through deal pricing or if lenders adjust their spreads, which had been unusually high during the crisis. The increase was primarily as a result of a rise in the 10-year treasury rates for domestic deals and due to the impact of the sovereign debt issues in Europe. During 2010, we obtained non-recourse mortgage financing totaling $446.3 million (on a pro rata basis).

General Economic Environment

Foreign Exchange Rates

We have foreign investments and, as a result, are subject to risk from the effects of exchange rate movements. Our results of foreign operations benefit from a weaker U.S. dollar and are adversely affected by a stronger U.S. dollar relative to foreign currencies. During 2010, the Euro weakened primarily as a result of sovereign debt issues in several European countries. Investments denominated in the Euro accounted for approximately 29% of our annualized contractual minimum base rent for 2010. During 2010, the U.S. dollar strengthened against the Euro, as the average conversion rate for the U.S. dollar in relation to the Euro decreased by 5% in comparison to 2009. Additionally, the end-of-period conversion rate of the Euro at December 31, 2010 decreased by 8% to $1.3253 from $1.4333 at December 31, 2009. This strengthening had a negative impact on our balance sheet at December 31, 2010 as compared to our balance sheet at December 31, 2009. While we actively manage our foreign exchange risk, a significant unhedged decline in the value of the Euro could have a material negative impact on our net asset values, future results, financial position and cash flows.

Real Estate Sector

As noted above, the commercial real estate market is impacted by a variety of macro-economic factors, including but not limited to growth in gross domestic product, unemployment, interest rates, inflation, and demographics. Since the beginning of the credit crisis, these macro-economic factors have persisted, negatively impacting commercial real estate market fundamentals, which has resulted in higher vacancies, lower rental rates, and lower demand for vacant space. While more recently there have been some indications of stabilization in asset values and slight improvements in occupancy rates, general uncertainty surrounding commercial real estate fundamentals and property valuations continues. We are chiefly affected by changes in the appraised values of our properties, tenant defaults, inflation, lease expirations, and occupancy rates.

Tenant Defaults

As a net lease investor, we are exposed to credit risk within our tenant portfolio, which can reduce our results of operations and cash flow from operations if our tenants are unable to pay their rent. Tenants experiencing financial difficulties may become delinquent on their rent and/or default on their leases and, if they file for bankruptcy protection, may reject our lease in bankruptcy court, resulting in reduced cash flow, which may negatively impact net asset values and require us to incur impairment charges. Even where a default has not occurred and a tenant is continuing to make the required lease payments, we may restructure or renew leases on less favorable terms, or the tenant’s credit profile may deteriorate, which could affect the value of the leased asset and could in turn require us to incur impairment charges.

As of the date of this Report, we have one tenant, Waldaschaff Automotive GmbH, in our portfolio operating under administrative protection who has been paying rent to us, albeit at a significantly reduced rate, while new lease terms are being negotiated. We have observed that many of our tenants have benefited from continued improvements in general business conditions.

To mitigate these risks, we have historically looked to invest in assets that we believe are critically important to a tenant’s operations and have attempted to diversify our portfolio by tenant, tenant industry and geography. We also monitor tenant performance through review of rent delinquencies as a precursor to a potential default, meetings with tenant management and review of tenants’ financial statements and compliance with any financial covenants. When necessary, our asset management process includes restructuring transactions to meet the evolving needs of tenants, re-leasing properties, refinancing debt and selling properties, as well as protecting our rights when tenants default or enter into bankruptcy.

CPA^®:17 2010 10-K — 35

Inflation

Our leases generally have rent adjustments that are either fixed or based on formulas indexed to changes in the consumer price index CPI or other similar indices for the jurisdiction in which the property is located. Because these rent adjustments may be calculated based on changes in the CPI over a multi-year period, changes in inflation rates can have a delayed impact on our results of operations. Rent adjustments during 2009 and, to a lesser extent, 2010 generally benefited from increases in inflation rates during the years prior to the scheduled rent adjustment date. However, despite recent signs of inflationary pressure, we continue to expect that rent increases will be significantly lower in coming years as a result of the current historically low inflation rates in the U.S. and the Euro zone.

Lease Expirations and Occupancy

Our leases are in their early stages with no significant leases scheduled to expire or renew in the near term. The advisor actively manages our real estate portfolio and begins discussing options with tenants in advance of the scheduled lease expiration. In certain cases, we obtain lease renewals from our tenants; however, tenants may elect to move out at the end of their term, or may elect to exercise purchase options, if any, in their leases. In cases where tenants elect not to renew, we may seek replacement tenants or try to sell the property. Our occupancy remained at 100% at December 31, 2010, reflecting a portfolio of primarily new tenants.

Proposed Accounting Changes

The International Accounting Standards Board and FASB have issued an Exposure Draft on a joint proposal that would dramatically transform lease accounting from the existing model. These changes would impact most companies but are particularly applicable to those that are significant users of real estate. The proposal outlines a completely new model for accounting by lessees, whereby their rights and obligations under all leases, existing and new, would be capitalized and recorded on the balance sheet. For some companies, the new accounting guidance may influence whether or not, or the extent to which, they enter into the type of sale-leaseback transactions in which we specialize. At this time, the proposed guidance has not been finalized, and as such we are unable to determine whether this proposal will have a material impact on our business.

How We Evaluate Results of Operations

We evaluate our results of operations with a primary focus on our ability to generate cash flow necessary to meet our objectives of funding distributions to shareholders and increasing our equity in our real estate. As a result, our assessment of operating results gives less emphasis to the effect of unrealized gains and losses, which may cause fluctuations in net income for comparable periods but have no impact on cash flows, and to other non-cash charges, such as depreciation and impairment charges.

We consider cash flows from operating activities, cash flows from investing activities, cash flows from financing activities and certain non-GAAP performance metrics to be important measures in the evaluation of our results of operations, liquidity and capital resources. Cash flows from operating activities are sourced primarily from long-term lease contracts. These leases are generally triple net and mitigate, to an extent, our exposure to certain property operating expenses. Our evaluation of the amount and expected fluctuation of cash flows from operating activities is essential in evaluating our ability to fund operating expenses, service debt and fund distributions to shareholders.

We consider cash flows from operating activities plus cash distributions from equity investments in real estate in excess of equity income, less cash distributions paid to consolidated joint venture partners, as a supplemental measure of liquidity in evaluating our ability to sustain distributions to shareholders. We consider this measure useful as a supplemental measure to the extent the source of distributions in excess of equity income in real estate is the result of non-cash charges, such as depreciation and amortization, because it allows us to evaluate such cash flows from consolidated and unconsolidated investments in a comparable manner. In deriving this measure, we exclude cash distributions from equity investments in real estate that are sourced from the sales of the equity investee’s assets or refinancing of debt because we deem them to be returns of investment and not returns on investment.

We focus on measures of cash flows from investing activities and cash flows from financing activities in our evaluation of our capital resources. Investing activities typically consist of the acquisition or disposition of investments in real property and the funding of capital expenditures with respect to real properties. Financing activities primarily consist of the payment of distributions to shareholders, obtaining non-recourse mortgage financing, generally in connection with the acquisition or refinancing of properties, and making mortgage principal payments. Our financing strategy is to attempt to purchase substantially all of our properties with a combination of equity and non-recourse mortgage debt. A lender on a non-recourse mortgage loan generally has recourse only to the property collateralizing such debt and not to any of our other assets. We expect that this strategy will allow us to diversify our portfolio of properties and, thereby, limit our risk.

CPA^®:17 2010 10-K — 36

Results of Operations

We were formed in 2007 and have a limited operating history. The results of operations presented below for the year ended December 31, 2010 are not expected to be representative of future results because we anticipate that our asset base will increase substantially as we continue to invest capital. We entered into our first consolidated investment in June 2008 and recorded minimal property-related revenues and expenses during the year ended December 31, 2008. As our asset base increases, we expect that property-related revenues and expenses, as well as general and administrative expenses and other revenues and expenses, will increase.

We are dependent upon proceeds received from our initial public offering to conduct our proposed activities. The capital required to make investments will be obtained from the offering and from any mortgage indebtedness that we may incur in connection with our investment activity.

We own interests in consolidated ventures ranging from 55% to 70%, including our 55% interest in the New York Times transaction. Although we consolidate the results of operations of these ventures, because our effective ownership interests in these ventures are low, a significant portion of the results of operations from these ventures is reduced by our noncontrolling partners’ interests.

The following table presents the components of our lease revenues (in thousands):

		Years ended December 31,
		2010				2009				2008
Rental income		$	52,292			$	18,333			$	6,630
Interest income from direct financing leases			40,028				29,117				1,392
		$	92,320			$	47,450			$	8,022

CPA^®:17 2010 10-K — 37

The following table sets forth the net lease revenues (i.e., rental income and interest income from direct financing leases) that we earned from lease obligations through our direct ownership of real estate (in thousands):

		Years ended December 31,
Lessee (Date Acquired or Placed in Service)		2010				2009				2008
The New York Times Company (3/2009) (a)		$	26,768			$	21,751			$	—
Eroski Sociedad Cooperativa (6/2010, 2/2010, 12/2009) (b) (c)			8,281				101				—
LifeTime Fitness, Inc. (9/2008)			6,847				6,847				1,712
Agrokor d.d. (4/2010, 12/2010) (b)			6,783				—				—
Frontier Spinning Mills, Inc. (12/2008) (a)			4,464				4,469				12
US Oncology, Inc. (12/2009)			4,189				251				—
Actebis Peacock GmbH (7/2008) (a) (b)			3,967				4,143				2,065
Angelica Corporation (3/2010)			3,855				—				—
Kronos Products, Inc. (3/2010)			3,784				—				—
Laureate Education, Inc. (7/2008)			2,895				2,893				1,325
Mori Seiki USA, Inc. (12/2009)			2,811				189				—
Sabre Communications Corporation and Cellxion, LLC (6/2010, 8/2008)			2,695				2,578				1,083
JP Morgan Chase Bank, National Association and AT&T Wireless Services (5/2010)			2,440				—				—
TDG Limited (4/2010, 5/2010) (b)			2,040				—				—
Wagon Automotive Nagold GmbH (8/2008) (a)(b)(d)			2,033				2,316				865
National Express Limited (12/2009) (b)			1,919				52				—
Berry Plastics Corporation (3/2010) (c)			1,548				—				—
Waldaschaff Automotive GmbH (formerly Wagon Automotive GmbH) (8/2008) (a)(b)(e)			670				1,346				830
Other (b)			4,331				514				130
		$	92,320			$	47,450			$	8,022

CPA^®:17 2010 10-K — 38

We recognize income from equity investments in real estate, of which lease revenues are a significant component. The following table sets forth the net lease revenues earned by these ventures. Amounts provided are the total amounts attributable to the ventures and do not represent our proportionate share (dollars in thousands):

		Ownership Interest at				Years ended December 31,
Lessee (Date Acquired)		December 31, 2010				2010				2009				2008
Tesco plc (7/2009) (a)			49	%		$	7,337			$	3,420			$	—
Berry Plastics Corporation (12/2007) (b)			50	%			6,666				6,641				6,651
Eroski Sociedad Cooperativa — Mallorca (6/2010) (a) (b)			30	%			1,710				—				—
						$	15,713			$	10,061			$	6,651

Lease Revenues

Our net leases generally have rent adjustments based on formulas indexed to changes in the CPI or other similar indices for the jurisdiction in which the property is located, sales overrides or other periodic increases, which are intended to increase lease revenues in the future. We own international investments and therefore, lease revenues from these investments are subject to fluctuations in exchange rates in foreign currencies.

2010 vs. 2009 — For the year ended December 31, 2010 as compared to 2009, lease revenues increased by $44.9 million primarily due to our investment activity during 2009 and 2010.

2009 vs. 2008 — For the year ended December 31, 2009 as compared to 2008, lease revenues increased by $39.4 million as a result of our investment activity during 2008 and 2009, including lease revenues earned in 2009 totaling $21.8 million from the New York Times transaction.

Other Real Estate Operations

Other real estate operations represents the results of operations (revenues and operating expenses) of our domestic hotel venture, which we acquired in May 2010. Our results of operations from our hotel venture reflected income and expenses of $2.2 million and $1.3 million, respectively, for the year ended December 31, 2010.

Interest Income from CMBS and Notes Receivable

Interest income from CMBS and notes receivable was comprised only of Interest income from CMBS for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008.

2010 vs. 2009 — For the year ended December 31, 2010 as compared to 2009, interest income from CMBS investments and notes receivable increased by $0.8 million, primarily as a result of interest income from notes receivable totaling $1.5 million recognized during 2010, primarily consisting of $1.3 million in interest income from a participation in the limited-recourse mortgage loan outstanding related to our New York Times venture that we purchased in July 2010, offset by a decrease in interest income from CMBS investments. Following the recognition of impairment charges during the fourth quarter of 2009, the carrying value of the CMBS investments was equal to the amount of cash flows we expect to collect, and therefore no amounts were accreted into income during the year ended December 31, 2010.

2009 vs. 2008 — For the year ended December 31, 2009 as compared to 2008, interest income from CMBS investments and notes receivable increased by $1.1 million, reflecting the full year impact of the CMBS investments, which we acquired during the second quarter of 2008. We recognized other-than-temporary impairment charges totaling $15.6 million in earnings in connection with our CMBS investments during 2009 (see Impairment charges on CMBS below).

CPA^®:17 2010 10-K — 39

Depreciation and Amortization

2010 vs. 2009 — For the year ended December 31, 2010 as compared to 2009, depreciation and amortization increased by $9.2 million, related to investments we entered into during 2009 and 2010.

2009 vs. 2008 — For the year ended December 31, 2009 as compared to 2008, depreciation and amortization increased by $3.5 million related to investments we entered into during 2008 and 2009.

General and Administrative

2010 vs. 2009 — For the year ended December 31, 2010 as compared to 2009, general and administrative expense increased by $1.8 million, primarily due to increases in professional fees of $0.9 million and management expenses of $0.5 million. Professional fees include legal, accounting and investor-related expenses incurred in the normal course of business. Management expenses include our reimbursements to WPC for the allocated costs of personnel and overhead in providing management of our day-to-day operations, including accounting services, shareholder services, corporate management, and property management and operations.

2009 vs. 2008 — For the year ended December 31, 2009 as compared to 2008, general and administrative expenses increased by $1.4 million, primarily due to increases in professional fees of $0.5 million, business development expenses of $0.4 million and management expenses of $0.3 million. Business development costs reflect costs incurred in connection with potential investments that ultimately were not consummated.

Property Expenses

2010 vs. 2009 — For the year ended December 31, 2010 as compared to 2009, property expenses increased by $3.7 million, primarily due to increases in asset management fees of $2.6 million and reimbursable tenant costs of $1.2 million. Asset management fees increased as a result of 2010 investment volume. Reimbursable tenant costs are recorded as both revenue and expenses and therefore have no impact on our results of operations.

2009 vs. 2008 — For the year ended December 31, 2009 as compared to 2008, property expenses increased by $2.5 million, primarily due to an increase of $1.8 million in asset management fees payable to WPC and an increase of $0.5 million in uncollected rent expense related to Wagon Automotive Nagold GmbH.

Impairment Charges on Net Investments in Properties

2009 — During 2009, we incurred impairment charges of $8.3 million related to properties leased to Waldaschaff Automotive GmbH and Wagon Automotive Nagold GmbH. We recognized an impairment charge of $7.5 million related to the Waldaschaff Automotive GmbH property, which was formerly leased to Wagon Automotive GmbH, to reduce the property’s carrying value to its estimated fair value. In addition, we recognized an impairment charge of $0.8 million related to the Wagon Automotive Nagold GmbH property to reflect the decline in its estimated residual value.

See Income (loss) from equity investments in real estate for information regarding impairment charges recognized in connection with our equity investments in real estate during 2009.

Impairment Charges on CMBS

2009 — During 2009, we incurred other-than-temporary impairment charges on our CMBS portfolio totaling $17.1 million to reduce the carrying value of the portfolio to its estimated fair value as a result of increased delinquencies in our CMBS portfolio and our expectation of future credit losses. Of the total impairment charges, we recognized $15.6 million in earnings related to our expected credit losses and $1.5 million in Other comprehensive loss (“OCL”) in equity related to noncredit factors (Note 7).

Income (Loss) from Equity Investments in Real Estate

Income (loss) from equity investments in real estate represents our proportionate share of net income or net loss (revenue less expenses) from investments entered into with affiliates in which we have a noncontrolling interest but over which we exercise significant influence. Under current accounting guidance for investments in unconsolidated ventures, we are required to periodically compare an investment’s carrying value to its estimated fair value and recognize an impairment charge to the extent that carrying value exceeds fair value.

CPA^®:17 2010 10-K — 40

2010 vs. 2009 — For the year ended December 31, 2010 as compared to 2009, income from equity investments in real estate increased $0.3 million, primarily due to our investment in the Eroski — Mallorca transaction in June 2010, which contributed income of $0.4 million during 2010.

2009 vs. 2008 — For the year ended December 31, 2009, we recognized income from equity investments in real estate of $1.4 million as compared to a loss from equity investments in real estate of $1.8 million during 2008. Income from equity investments in real estate recognized during 2009 was substantially comprised of our share of income earned by a venture that leases properties to Berry Plastics. In addition to income earned from its ongoing operations, during 2009 this venture recognized a gain on extinguishment of debt of $6.5 million in connection with the repayment of its existing $39.0 million non-recourse mortgage loan at a discount for $32.5 million. Our share of the gain on extinguishment of debt was $3.2 million; however, our share of the gain was reduced by $2.9 million due to an other-than-temporary impairment charge that we recognized to reduce the carrying value of our investment to the estimated fair value of the venture’s underlying net assets.

The loss from equity investments in real estate of $1.8 million recognized during 2008 was primarily due to the recognition of an other-than-temporary impairment charge of $2.1 million to reduce the carrying value of our investment in the Berry Plastics venture to the estimated fair value of the venture’s underlying net assets.

Other Income and (Expenses)

Other income and (expenses) consists primarily of gains and losses on foreign currency transactions. We and certain of our foreign consolidated subsidiaries have intercompany debt and/or advances that are not denominated in the entity’s functional currency. When the intercompany debt or accrued interest thereon is remeasured against the functional currency of the entity, a gain or loss may result. For intercompany transactions that are of a long-term investment nature, the gain or loss is recognized as a cumulative translation adjustment in OCL. We also recognize gains or losses on foreign currency transactions when we repatriate cash from our foreign investments. In addition, we have embedded credit derivatives for which realized and unrealized gains and losses are included in earnings. The timing and amount of such gains and losses cannot always be estimated and are subject to fluctuation.

2010 — For the year ended December 31, 2010, we recognized net other income of $0.7 million, which was comprised of realized foreign currency transaction gains, principally as a result of cash received from foreign subsidiaries in connection with intercompany debt and foreign ventures acquired in 2010.

2009 — For the year ended December 31, 2009, we recognized net other expenses of $2.5 million, which was primarily comprised of realized losses of $2.0 million on foreign currency transactions as a result of changes in foreign currency exchange rates on deposits that had been held for new investments but that were released to us because the transactions were not consummated

2008 — For the year ended December 31, 2008, we recognized net other expenses of $1.8 million, which was primarily comprised of a charge of $1.4 million to write down to its estimated fair value an embedded credit derivative related to Wagon Automotive GmbH (the predecessor tenant of Waldaschaff Automotive GmbH) and Wagon Automotive Nagold investments.

Interest Expense

2010 vs. 2009 — For the year ended December 31, 2010 as compared to 2009, interest expense increased by $17.0 million primarily as a result of mortgage financing obtained during 2010 and 2009 in connection with our investment activity.

2009 vs. 2008 — For the year ended December 31, 2009 as compared to 2008, interest expense increased by $7.1 million as a result of mortgage financing obtained during 2009 and 2008 in connection with our investment activity.

Net Income (Loss) Attributable to CPA^®:17 — Global Shareholders

2010 vs. 2009 — For the year ended December 31, 2010, the resulting net income attributable to CPA^®:17 — Global shareholders was $30.5 million as compared to a net loss of $7.7 million for 2009.

CPA^®:17 2010 10-K — 41

2009 vs. 2008 — For the year ended December 31, 2009 as compared to 2008, the resulting net loss attributable to CPA^®:17 — Global shareholders increased by $6.5 million to $7.7 million.

Funds from Operations — as Adjusted (AFFO)

2010 vs. 2009 — For the year ended December 31, 2010 as compared to 2009, AFFO increased by $25.0 million, primarily as a result of the aforementioned increases in results of operations as generated from our investment activity. AFFO is a non-GAAP measure we use to evaluate our business. For a definition of AFFO and reconciliation to net income (loss) attributable to CPA^®:17 — Global shareholders, see Supplemental Financial Measures below.

2009 vs. 2008 — For the year ended December 31, 2009 as compared to 2008, AFFO increased by $12.9 million, primarily as a result of the aforementioned increases in results of operations as generated from our investment activity.

Financial Condition

Sources and Uses of Cash During the Year

Our initial public offering will terminate at the earlier of (i) the date on which the registration for our anticipated follow-on offering is declared effective by the SEC or (ii) May 2, 2011. We expect to continue to invest the proceeds of our offering in a diversified portfolio of income-producing commercial properties and other real estate related assets. Once we have fully invested these proceeds, we expect that our primary source of operating cash flow will be cash flow generated from our net leases and other real estate related assets. We expect that these cash flows will fluctuate period to period due to a number of factors, which may include, among other things, the timing of purchases and sales of real estate, the timing of proceeds from non-recourse mortgage loans and receipt of lease revenues, the advisor’s annual election to receive fees in restricted shares of our common stock or cash, changes in foreign currency exchange rates and the timing and characterization of distributions received from equity investments in real estate. Despite this fluctuation, we believe our net leases and other real estate related assets will generate sufficient cash from operations and from equity distributions in excess of equity income in real estate to meet our short-term and long-term liquidity needs. However, until we have fully invested the proceeds of our offering, we may use a portion of the offering proceeds to fund our operating activities and distributions to shareholders (see Financing Activities below). Our sources and uses of cash during the year are described below.

Operating Activities

During the year ended December 31, 2010, we used cash flows provided by operating activities of $68.0 million to fund cash distributions to shareholders of $30.6 million, which excludes the $30.3 million in dividends that were reinvested by shareholders in our common stock through our distribution reinvestment and share purchase plan (“DRP”). We also paid distributions of $13.0 million to affiliates who hold noncontrolling interests in various entities with us and made scheduled principal installments on mortgage loans of $6.5 million. For 2010, the advisor elected to continue to receive its asset management fees in restricted shares of our common stock, and as a result, we paid asset management fees of $4.6 million through the issuance of restricted stock rather than in cash.

Investing Activities

Our investing activities are generally comprised of real estate-related transactions (purchases and sales), payment of deferred acquisition fees to the advisor and capitalized property-related costs. During the year ended December 31, 2010, our investment activity totaled $1.0 billion, including a total of $917.9 million to acquire fifteen consolidated investments and to fund construction costs for five build-to-suit projects, one of which was placed into service during the first quarter of 2010. We also used $90.7 million to fund or purchase note receivables, comprised of $50.1 million to purchase a participation in the limited-recourse mortgage loan outstanding related to our New York Times venture and $40.6 million to provide financing to a subsidiary of a property developer in China as part of an intended strategic plan to cooperate on investments in China with that developer. Our investment activity also included $10.6 million related primarily to our equity investment, Eroski — Mallorca, in Spain. We paid foreign value added taxes, or VAT, totaling $53.2 million during 2010 in connection with several international investments, of which $40.4 million was recovered during 2010, with the remainder expected to be fully recovered in future periods. We also placed $52.5 million in escrow for potential future transactions, primarily related to the purchase of our participation in the non-recourse mortgage loan related to our New York Times venture, as noted above and subsequently released these funds upon completion of the transaction. We received $7.4 million from the repayment of notes receivable, primarily related to the repayment of Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation guaranteed unsecured notes that matured during the period totaling $7.0 million. Payments of deferred acquisition fees to the advisor totaled $7.2 million for 2010.

CPA^®:17 2010 10-K — 42

Financing Activities

In addition to paying distributions to shareholders and to affiliates that hold noncontrolling interests in various entities with us and making scheduled mortgage principal payments, our financing activities for the year ended December 31, 2010 primarily consisted of the receipt of $557.9 million in net proceeds from our initial public offering and proceeds from mortgage financings related to recent investment activity totaling $425.9 million. In addition, we used $53.0 million to prepay two non-recourse mortgage loans, primarily consisting of one loan totaling $51.1 million, which was refinanced for new non-recourse debt of $53.0 million, included in proceeds from mortgage financings above.

Our objectives are to generate sufficient cash flow over time to provide shareholders with increasing distributions and to seek investments with potential for capital appreciation throughout varying economic cycles. We have funded a portion of our cash distributions to date using net proceeds from our initial public offering and we may do so in the future, particularly until we substantially invest the net offering proceeds. In determining our distribution policy during the periods we are raising funds and investing capital, we place primary emphasis on projections of cash flow from operations, together with equity distributions in excess of equity income in real estate, from our investments, rather than on historical results of operations (though these and other factors may be a part of our consideration). In setting a distribution rate, we thus focus primarily on expected returns from those investments we have already made, as well as our anticipated rate of future investment, to assess the sustainability of a particular distribution rate over time.

We maintain a quarterly redemption plan pursuant to which we may, at the discretion of our board of directors, redeem shares of our common stock from shareholders seeking liquidity. We limit the number of shares we may redeem so that the shares we redeem in any quarter, together with the aggregate number of shares redeemed in the preceding three fiscal quarters, does not exceed a maximum of 5% of our total shares outstanding as of the last day of the immediately preceding quarter. In addition, our ability to effect redemptions is subject to our having available cash to do so. For the year ended December 31, 2010, we received requests to redeem 616,159 shares of our common stock pursuant to our redemption plan, and we used $5.7 million to fulfill these requests at a price per share of $9.30. We funded share redemptions during 2010 from the proceeds of the sale of shares of our common stock pursuant to our DRP.

Liquidity would be affected adversely by unanticipated costs, lower-than-anticipated fundraising and greater-than-anticipated operating expenses. To the extent that our cash reserves are insufficient to satisfy our cash requirements, additional funds may be provided from cash generated from operations or through short-term borrowings. In addition, we may incur indebtedness in connection with the acquisition of any property, refinancing the debt thereon, arranging for the leveraging of any previously unfinanced property, or reinvesting the proceeds of financings or refinancings in additional properties.

Adjusted Cash Flow from Operating Activities

Adjusted cash flow from operating activities is a non-GAAP measure we use to evaluate our business. For a definition of adjusted cash flow from operating activities and reconciliation to cash flow from operating activities, see Supplemental Financial Measures below.

Our adjusted cash flow from operating activities for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008 was $48.1 million, $20.3 million and $3.7 million, respectively. These increases were primarily due to increases in property-level cash flow generated from our recent investment activity during 2009 and 2010.

CPA^®:17 2010 10-K — 43

Summary of Financing

The table below summarizes our non-recourse and limited-recourse long-term debt (dollars in thousands):

		December 31,
		2010				2009
Balance
Fixed rate		$	516,103			$	154,754
Variable rate (a)			151,375				146,154
Total		$	667,478			$	300,908
Percent of total debt
Fixed rate			77	%			51	%
Variable rate (a)			23	%			49	%
			100	%			100	%
Weighted average interest rate at end of period
Fixed rate			6.2	%			7.1	%
Variable rate (a)			5.4	%			5.3	%

Cash Resources

At December 31, 2010, our cash resources consisted of cash and cash equivalents totaling $162.7 million, which primarily reflects the uninvested proceeds of our initial public offering at that date. As discussed above, we currently expect to continue to raise funds through our initial public offering through the earlier of (i) the date that our anticipated follow-on offering is declared effective by the SEC or (ii) May 2, 2011. However, there can be no assurance that we will actually commence our follow-on offering or, if commenced, that we will successfully raise the amount of funds sought in that offering. Of our total cash and cash equivalents at December 31, 2010, $20.2 million, at then-current exchange rates, was held in foreign bank accounts, but we could be subject to restrictions or significant costs should we decide to repatriate these amounts. At December 31, 2010, we had unleveraged properties that had an aggregate carrying value of $280.8 million, although given the current economic environment, there can be no assurance that we would be able to obtain financing for these properties. Our cash resources can be used to fund future investments as well as for working capital needs and other commitments.

Cash Requirements

During 2011, we expect that cash payments will include the repayment of a $90.0 million short-term loan from our advisor used to fund acquisitions during the first quarter of 2011, paying distributions to shareholders and to our affiliates who hold noncontrolling interests in entities we control, making scheduled mortgage loan principal payments (neither we nor our venture partners have any balloon payments on our mortgage obligations until 2014), reimbursing the advisor for costs incurred on our behalf and paying normal recurring operating expenses. See below for cash requirements related to the Proposed Merger. We expect to continue to use funds raised from either our initial public offering or follow-on offering, as applicable, to invest in new properties.

Expected Impact of Asset Purchase

If the Proposed Merger is approved by shareholders of CPA^®:14, we currently expect the asset sale from CPA^®:14 to us, which is contingent on the closing of the Proposed Merger, to have the following impact on our liquidity and results of operations; however there can be no assurance that this transaction will be completed during 2011 or at all.

We currently expect to use existing cash resources and proceeds from our initial public offering, and if declared effective by the SEC, our follow-on offering, as applicable, to finance the purchase of three properties from CPA^®:14 for approximately $57.4 million, plus the assumption of approximately $153.9 million of indebtedness. We currently estimate that the properties to be acquired from CPA^®:14 will generate annual equity income of approximately $5.7 million based upon actual income from equity investments in real estate recognized by CPA^®:14 during 2010.

CPA^®:17 2010 10-K — 44

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements and Contractual Obligations

The table below summarizes our debt, off-balance sheet arrangements and other contractual obligations at December 31, 2010 and the effect that these arrangements and obligations are expected to have on our liquidity and cash flow in the specified future periods (in thousands):

						Less than												More than
		Total				1 Year				1-3 Years				3-5 Years				5 years
Non-recourse and limited-recourse debt — principal (a)		$	668,483			$	11,530			$	26,785			$	176,508			$	453,660
Deferred acquisition fees			19,819				9,128				10,691				—				—
Interest on borrowings and deferred acquisition fees			283,322				40,049				78,183				67,546				97,544
Build-to-suit and other capital commitments (b)			32,967				32,967				—				—				—
Lending commitment (c)			22,570				1,900				20,670				—				—
Operating and other lease commitments (d)			1,641				259				526				519				337
		$	1,028,802			$	95,833			$	136,855			$	244,573			$	551,541

Amounts in the table above related to our foreign operations are based on the exchange rate of the local currencies at December 31, 2010. At December 31, 2010, we had no material capital lease obligations for which we are the lessee, either individually or in the aggregate.

Asset Purchase

On December 13, 2010, we entered into a sale and purchase agreement with CPA^®:14 pursuant to which we have agreed to purchase CPA^®:14’s interests in three properties for an aggregate purchase price of $57.4 million, plus the assumption of approximately $153.9 million of indebtedness. The purchase price is determined by the advisor relying in part upon a valuation of the properties as of September 30, 2010 performed by a third-party valuation firm. The completion of the sale of assets to us is a condition to the closing of the Proposed Merger.

CPA^®:17 2010 10-K — 45

Equity Investments in Real Estate

We have investments in unconsolidated ventures that own single-tenant properties net leased to corporations. Generally, the underlying investments are jointly-owned with our affiliates. Summarized financial information for these ventures and our ownership interest in the ventures at December 31, 2010 are presented below. Summarized financial information provided represents the total amounts attributable to the ventures and does not represent our proportionate share (dollars in thousands):

		Ownership
		Interest at								Total Third				Debt
Lessee		December 31, 2010				Total Assets				Party Debt				Maturity Date
Berry Plastics Corporation			50	%			79,412				28,701				3/2012
Tesco plc (a)			49	%		$	89,405			$	45,339				6/2016
Eroski Sociedad Cooperativa — Mallorca (a)			30	%			35,172				—				N/A
						$	203,989			$	74,040

Environmental Obligations

In connection with the purchase of many of our properties, we required the sellers to perform environmental reviews. We believe, based on the results of these reviews, that our properties were in substantial compliance with Federal and state environmental statutes at the time the properties were acquired. However, portions of certain properties have been subject to some degree of contamination, principally in connection with leakage from underground storage tanks, surface spills or other on-site activities. In most instances where contamination has been identified, tenants are actively engaged in the remediation process and addressing identified conditions. Tenants are generally subject to environmental statutes and regulations regarding the discharge of hazardous materials and any related remediation obligations. In addition, our leases generally require tenants to indemnify us from all liabilities and losses related to the leased properties, with provisions of such indemnification specifically addressing environmental matters. The leases generally include provisions that allow for periodic environmental assessments, paid for by the tenant, and allow us to extend leases until such time as a tenant has satisfied its environmental obligations. Certain of our leases allow us to require financial assurances from tenants, such as performance bonds or letters of credit, if the costs of remediating environmental conditions are, in our estimation, in excess of specified amounts. Accordingly, we believe that the ultimate resolution of any environmental matters should not have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, liquidity or results of operations.

Critical Accounting Estimates

Our significant accounting policies are described in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements. Many of these accounting policies require judgment and the use of estimates and assumptions when applying these policies in the preparation of our consolidated financial statements. On a quarterly basis, we evaluate these estimates and judgments based on historical experience as well as other factors that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances. These estimates are subject to change in the future if underlying assumptions or factors change. Certain accounting policies, while significant, may not require the use of estimates. Those accounting policies that require significant estimation and/or judgment are listed below.

Classification of Real Estate Assets

We classify our directly-owned leased assets for financial reporting purposes at the inception of a lease, or when significant lease terms are amended, as either real estate leased under operating leases or net investment in direct financing leases. This classification is based on several criteria, including, but not limited to, estimates of the remaining economic life of the leased assets and the calculation of the present value of future minimum rents. We estimate remaining economic life relying in part upon third-party appraisals of the leased assets. We calculate the present value of future minimum rents using the lease’s implicit interest rate, which requires an estimate of the residual value of the leased assets as of the end of the non-cancelable lease term. Estimates of residual values are generally determined by us relying in part upon third-party appraisals. Different estimates of residual value result in different implicit interest rates and could possibly affect the financial reporting classification of leased assets. The contractual terms of our leases are not necessarily different for operating and direct financing leases; however, the classification is based on accounting pronouncements that are intended to indicate whether the risks and rewards of ownership are retained by the lessor or substantially transferred to the lessee. We believe that we retain certain risks of ownership regardless of accounting classification. Assets classified as net investment in direct financing leases are not depreciated but are written down to expected residual value over the lease term. Therefore, the classification of assets may have a significant impact on net income even though it has no effect on cash flows.

CPA^®:17 2010 10-K — 46

Identification of Tangible and Intangible Assets in Connection with Real Estate Acquisitions

In connection with our acquisition of properties accounted for as operating leases, we allocate purchase costs to tangible and intangible assets and liabilities acquired based on their estimated fair values. We determine the value of tangible assets, consisting of land and buildings, as if vacant, and record intangible assets, including the above- and below-market value of leases, the value of in-place leases and the value of tenant relationships, at their relative estimated fair values.

We determine the value attributed to tangible assets in part using a discounted cash flow model that is intended to approximate both what a third-party would pay to purchase the vacant property and rent at current estimated market rates. In applying the model, we assume that the disinterested party would sell the property at the end of an estimated market lease term. Assumptions used in the model are property-specific where this information is available; however, when certain necessary information is not available, we use available regional and property-type information. Assumptions and estimates include a discount rate or internal rate of return, marketing period necessary to put a lease in place, carrying costs during the marketing period, leasing commissions and tenant improvements allowances, market rents and growth factors of these rents, market lease term and a cap rate to be applied to an estimate of market rent at the end of the market lease term.

We acquire properties subject to net leases and determine the value of above-market and below-market lease intangibles based on the difference between (i) the contractual rents to be paid pursuant to the leases negotiated and in place at the time of acquisition of the properties and (ii) our estimate of fair market lease rates for the property or a similar property, both of which are measured over a period equal to the estimated market lease term. We discount the difference between the estimated market rent and contractual rent to a present value using an interest rate reflecting our current assessment of the risk associated with the lease acquired, which includes a consideration of the credit of the lessee. Estimates of market rent are generally determined by us relying in part upon a third-party appraisal obtained in connection with the property acquisition and can include estimates of market rent increase factors, which are generally provided in the appraisal or by local brokers.

We evaluate the specific characteristics of each tenant’s lease and any pre-existing relationship with each tenant in determining the value of in-place lease and tenant relationship intangibles. To determine the value of in-place lease intangibles, we consider estimated market rent, estimated carrying costs of the property during a hypothetical expected lease-up period, current market conditions and costs to execute similar leases. Estimated carrying costs include real estate taxes, insurance, other property operating costs and estimates of lost rentals at market rates during the hypothetical expected lease-up periods, based on assessments of specific market conditions. In determining the value of tenant relationship intangibles, we consider the expectation of lease renewals, the nature and extent of our existing relationship with the tenant, prospects for developing new business with the tenant and the tenant’s credit profile. We also consider estimated costs to execute a new lease, including estimated leasing commissions and legal costs, as well as estimated carrying costs of the property during a hypothetical expected lease-up period. We determine these values using our estimates or by relying in part upon third-party appraisals.

Basis of Consolidation

When we obtain an economic interest in an entity, we evaluate the entity to determine if it is deemed a variable interest entity (“VIE”) and, if so, whether we are deemed to be the primary beneficiary and are therefore required to consolidate the entity. Significant judgment is required to determine whether a VIE should be consolidated. We review the contractual arrangements provided for in the partnership agreement or other related contracts to determine whether the entity is considered a VIE under current authoritative accounting guidance, and to establish whether we have any variable interests in the VIE. We then compare our variable interests, if any, to those of the other variable interest holders to determine which party is the primary beneficiary of a VIE based on whether the entity (i) has the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact the economic performance of the VIE, and (ii) has the obligation to absorb losses or the right to receive benefits of the VIE that could potentially be significant to the VIE.

For an entity that is not considered to be a VIE, the general partners in a limited partnership (or similar entity) are presumed to control the entity regardless of the level of their ownership and, accordingly, may be required to consolidate the entity. We evaluate the partnership agreements or other relevant contracts to determine whether there are provisions in the agreements that would overcome this presumption. If the agreements provide the limited partners with either (a) the substantive ability to dissolve or liquidate the limited partnership or otherwise remove the general partners without cause or (b) substantive participating rights, the limited partners’ rights overcome the presumption of control by a general partner of the limited partnership, and, therefore, the general partner must account for its investment in the limited partnership using the equity method of accounting.

CPA^®:17 2010 10-K — 47

Impairments

We periodically assess whether there are any indicators that the value of our long-lived assets may be impaired or that their carrying value may not be recoverable. These impairment indicators include, but are not limited to, the vacancy of a property that is not subject to a lease; a lease default by a tenant that is experiencing financial difficulty; the termination of a lease by a tenant or the rejection of a lease in a bankruptcy proceeding. We may incur impairment charges on long-lived assets, including real estate, direct financing leases, assets held for sale and equity investments in real estate. We may also incur impairment charges on marketable securities and CMBS investments. Estimates and judgments used when evaluating whether these assets are impaired are presented below.

Real Estate

For real estate assets in which an impairment indicator is identified, we follow a two-step process to determine whether an asset is impaired and to determine the amount of the charge. First, we compare the carrying value of the property to the future net undiscounted cash flow that we expect the property will generate, including any estimated proceeds from the eventual sale of the property. The undiscounted cash flow analysis requires us to make our best estimate of market rents, residual values and holding periods. We estimate market rents and residual values using market information from outside sources such as broker quotes or recent comparable sales. In cases where the available market information is not deemed appropriate, we perform a future net cash flow analysis discounted for inherent risk associated with each asset to determine an estimated fair value. As our investment objective is to hold properties on a long-term basis, holding periods used in the undiscounted cash flow analysis generally range from five to ten years. Depending on the assumptions made and estimates used, the future cash flow projected in the evaluation of long-lived assets can vary within a range of outcomes. We consider the likelihood of possible outcomes in determining the best possible estimate of future cash flows. If the future net undiscounted cash flow of the property is less than the carrying value, the property is considered to be impaired. We then measure the loss as the excess of the carrying value of the property over its estimated fair value. The property’s estimated fair value is primarily determined using market information from outside sources such as broker quotes or recent comparable sales.

Direct Financing Leases

We review our direct financing leases at least annually to determine whether there has been an other-than-temporary decline in the current estimate of residual value of the property. The residual value is our estimate of what we could realize upon the sale of the property at the end of the lease term, based on market information from outside sources such as broker quotes or recent comparable sales. If this review indicates that a decline in residual value has occurred that is other-than-temporary, we recognize an impairment charge and revise the accounting for the direct financing lease to reflect a portion of the future cash flow from the lessee as a return of principal rather than as revenue. While we evaluate direct financing leases if there are any indicators that the residual value may be impaired, the evaluation of a direct financing lease can be affected by changes in long-term market conditions even though the obligations of the lessee are being met.

Equity Investments in Real Estate

We evaluate our equity investments in real estate on a periodic basis to determine if there are any indicators that the value of our equity investment may be impaired and to establish whether or not that impairment is other-than-temporary. To the extent impairment has occurred, we measure the charge as the excess of the carrying value of our investment over its estimated fair value, which is determined by multiplying the estimated fair value of the underlying venture’s net assets by our ownership interest percentage. For our unconsolidated ventures in real estate, we calculate the estimated fair value of the underlying venture’s real estate or net investment in direct financing lease as described in Real Estate and Direct Financing Leases above. The fair value of the underlying venture’s debt, if any, is calculated based on market interest rates and other market information. The fair value of the underlying venture’s other financial assets and liabilities (excluding net investment in direct financing leases) have fair values that approximate their carrying values.

CPA^®:17 2010 10-K — 48

Commercial Mortgage-Backed Securities

We have CMBS investments that are designated as securities held to maturity. On a quarterly basis, we evaluate our CMBS to determine if they have experienced an other-than temporary decline in value. In our evaluation, we consider, among other items, the significance of the decline in value compared to the cost basis; underlying factors contributing to the decline in value, such as delinquencies and expectations of credit losses; the length of time the market value of the security has been less than its cost basis; expected market volatility and market and economic conditions; advice from dealers; and our own experience in the market.

In 2009, the FASB amended its existing guidance on determining whether an impairment for investments in debt securities, including CMBS investments, is other-than-temporary. If the debt security’s market value is below its amortized cost and we either intend to sell the security or it is more likely than not that we will be required to sell the security before its anticipated recovery, we record the entire amount of the other-than-temporary impairment charge in earnings.

We do not intend to sell our CMBS investments, and we do not expect that it is more likely than not that we will be required to sell these investments before their anticipated recovery. We perform an additional analysis to determine whether we expect to recover our amortized cost basis in the investment. If we determine that a decline in the estimated fair value of our CMBS investments has occurred that is other-than-temporary and we do not expect to recover the entire amortized cost basis, we calculate the total other-than-temporary impairment charge as the difference between the CMBS investments’ carrying value and their estimated fair value. We then separate the other-than-temporary impairment charge into the portion of the loss related to noncredit factors, such as the illiquidity of the securities (the “noncredit loss portion”), and the portion related to credit factors (the “credit loss portion”). We determine the noncredit loss portion by analyzing the changes in spreads on high credit quality CMBS securities as compared with the changes in spreads on the CMBS securities being analyzed for other-than-temporary impairment. We generally perform this analysis over a time period from the date of acquisition of the debt securities through the date of the analysis. Any resulting loss is deemed to represent losses due to the illiquidity of the debt securities and is recorded as the noncredit loss portion. We then measure the credit loss portion of the other-than-temporary impairment as the residual amount of the other-than-temporary impairment. We record the noncredit loss portion as a separate component of OCL in equity and the credit loss portion in earnings.

Following recognition of the other-than-temporary impairment, the difference between the new cost basis of the CMBS investments and cash flows expected to be collected is accreted to Interest income from CMBS over the remaining expected lives of the securities.

Provision for Uncollected Amounts from Lessees

On an ongoing basis, we assess our ability to collect rent and other tenant-based receivables and determine an appropriate allowance for uncollected amounts. Because we have a limited number of lessees (18 lessees represented 95% of lease revenues during 2010), we believe that it is necessary to evaluate the collectability of these receivables based on the facts and circumstances of each situation rather than solely using statistical methods. Therefore, in recognizing our provision for uncollected rents and other tenant receivables, we evaluate actual past due amounts and make subjective judgments as to the collectability of those amounts based on factors including, but not limited to, our knowledge of a lessee’s circumstances, the age of the receivables, the tenant’s credit profile and prior experience with the tenant. Even if a lessee has been making payments, we may reserve for the entire receivable amount from the lessee if we believe there has been significant or continuing deterioration in the lessee’s ability to meet its lease obligations.

Income Taxes

We have elected to be treated as a REIT under Sections 856 through 860 of the Internal Revenue Code. In order to maintain our qualification as a REIT, we are required to, among other things, distribute at least 90% of our REIT net taxable income to our shareholders (excluding net capital gains) and meet certain tests regarding the nature of our income and assets. As a REIT, we are not subject to U.S. federal income tax with respect to the portion of our income that meets certain criteria and is distributed annually to shareholders. Accordingly, no provision for U.S. federal income taxes is included in the consolidated financial statements with respect to these operations. We believe we have operated, and we intend to continue to operate, in a manner that allows us to continue to meet the requirements for taxation as a REIT. Many of these requirements, however, are highly technical and complex. If we were to fail to meet these requirements, we would be subject to U.S. federal income tax.

We conduct business in various states and municipalities within the U.S. and the European Union and, as a result, we or one or more of our subsidiaries file income tax returns in the U.S. federal jurisdiction and various state and certain foreign jurisdictions. As a result, we are subject to certain state, local and foreign taxes and a provision for such taxes is included in the consolidated financial statements.

Significant judgment is required in determining our tax provision and in evaluating our tax positions. We establish tax reserves based on a benefit recognition model, which we believe could result in a greater amount of benefit (and a lower amount of reserve) being initially recognized in certain circumstances. Provided that the tax position is deemed more likely than not of being sustained, we recognize the largest amount of tax benefit that is greater than 50 percent likely of being ultimately realized upon settlement. The tax position must be derecognized when it is no longer more likely than not of being sustained.

CPA^®:17 2010 10-K — 49

Subsequent Events

In January 2011, we entered into an international investment with C1000 B.V., for a total cost of approximately $207.5 million. On March 16, 2011, we obtained non-recourse financing totaling $98.3 million, which bears interest at a variable rate of 3-month Euribor plus 2% and matures in March 2013. Our investment and non-recourse financing are inclusive of amounts attributable to noncontrolling interests of approximately $31.1 million and $14.7 million, respectively. Amounts are based on the exchange rate of the Euro at the date of acquisition or financing, as applicable. This investment was also funded in part by a $90.0 million short-term loan from our advisor and as of the date of this Report, we have repaid $75.0 million and the remaining $15.0 million becomes due on April 8, 2011.

Also in January 2011, we entered into a domestic investment for a cold storage facility at a total cost of approximately $99.5 million. In connection with this investment, we obtained non-recourse mortgage financing totaling $53.7 million, at a fixed annual interest rate and term of 6.0% and 10 years, respectively.

Supplemental Financial Measures

In the real estate industry, analysts and investors employ certain non-GAAP supplemental measures in order to facilitate meaningful comparisons between periods and among peer companies. Additionally, in the formulation of our goals and in the evaluation of the effectiveness of our strategies, we employ the use of supplemental non-GAAP measures, which are uniquely defined by our management. We believe these measures are useful to investors to consider because they may assist them to better understand and measure the performance of our business over time and against similar companies. A description of these non-GAAP financial measures and reconciliations to the most directly comparable GAAP measures are provided below.

Funds from Operations — as Adjusted

Funds from Operations (“FFO”) is a non-GAAP measure defined by the National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts (“NAREIT”). NAREIT defines FFO as net income or loss (as computed in accordance with GAAP) excluding: depreciation and amortization expense from real estate assets, gains or losses from sales of depreciated real estate assets and extraordinary items; however, FFO related to assets held for sale, sold or otherwise transferred and included in the results of discontinued operations are to be included. These adjustments also incorporate the pro rata share of unconsolidated subsidiaries. FFO is used by management, investors and analysts to facilitate meaningful comparisons of operating performance between periods and among our peers. Although NAREIT has published this definition of FFO, real estate companies often modify this definition as they seek to provide financial measures that meaningfully reflect their distinctive operations.

We modify the NAREIT computation of FFO to include other adjustments to GAAP net income for certain non-cash charges, where applicable, such as gains or losses on extinguishment of debt and deconsolidation of subsidiaries, amortization of intangibles, straight-line rents, impairment charges on real estate and unrealized foreign currency exchange gains and losses. We refer to our modified definition of FFO as “Funds from Operations — as Adjusted,” or AFFO, and we employ it as one measure of our operating performance when we formulate corporate goals and evaluate the effectiveness of our strategies. We exclude these items from GAAP net income as they are not the primary drivers in our decision-making process. Our assessment of our operations is focused on long-term sustainability and not on such non-cash items, which may cause short-term fluctuations in net income but have no impact on cash flows. As a result, we believe that AFFO is a useful supplemental measure for investors to consider because it will help them to better understand and measure the performance of our business over time without the potentially distorting impact of these short-term fluctuations.

		CPA®:17 2010 10-K — 50

FFO and AFFO for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008 are presented below (in thousands):

		Years ended December 31,
		2010				2009				2008
Net income (loss) attributable to CPA®:17 - Global shareholders		$	30,454			$	(7,701	)		$	(1,247	)
Adjustments:
Depreciation and amortization of real property			13,898				5,289				1,825
Loss on sale of real estate, net			(110	)			—				—
Proportionate share of adjustments to equity in net income of partially owned entities to arrive at FFO:
Depreciation and amortization of real property			3,136				2,182				1,183
Loss on sale of real estate, net			38				—				—
Proportionate share of adjustments for noncontrolling interests to arrive at FFO			(580	)			(653	)			(227	)
Total adjustments			16,382				6,818				2,781
FFO — as defined by NAREIT			46,836				(883	)			1,534
Adjustments:
Other depreciation, amortization and non-cash charges			79				83				1,404
Straight-line and other rent adjustments			(5,252	)			(3,562	)			(315	)
Impairment charges			—				23,904				—
Proportionate share of adjustments to equity in net income of partially owned entities to arrive at AFFO:
Other depreciation, amortization and other non-cash charges			(6	)			—				—
Straight-line and other rent adjustments			(364	)			(106	)			—
Impairment charges			—				—				2,120
Gain on extinguishment of debt			—				(326	)			—
Proportionate share of adjustments for noncontrolling interests to arrive at AFFO			938				(1,929	)			(491	)
Total adjustments			(4,605	)			18,064				2,718
AFFO		$	42,231			$	17,181			$	4,252

Adjusted Cash Flow from Operating Activities

Adjusted cash flow from operating activities refers to our cash flow from operating activities (as computed in accordance with GAAP) adjusted, where applicable, primarily to: add cash distributions that we receive from our investments in unconsolidated real estate joint ventures in excess of our equity income; subtract cash distributions that we make to our non-controlling partners in real estate joint ventures that we consolidate; and eliminate changes in working capital. We hold a number of interests in real estate joint ventures, and we believe that adjusting our GAAP cash flow provided by operating activities to reflect these actual cash receipts and cash payments as well as eliminating the effect of timing differences between the payment of certain liabilities and the receipt of certain receivables in a period other than that in which the item is recognized, may give investors additional information about our actual cash flow that is not incorporated in cash flow from operating activities as defined by GAAP.

We believe that adjusted cash flow from operating activities is a useful supplemental measure for assessing the cash flow generated from our core operations as it gives investors important information about our liquidity that is not provided within cash flow from operating activities as defined by GAAP, and we use this measure when evaluating distributions to shareholders. As we are still in our offering and investment stage, we also consider our expectations as to the yields that may be generated on existing investments and our acquisition pipeline when evaluating distributions to shareholders.

		CPA®:17 2010 10-K — 51

Adjusted cash flow from operating activities for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008 is presented below (in thousands):

		Years ended December 31,
		2010				2009				2008
Cash flow provided by operating activities		$	67,975			$	32,240			$	4,443
Adjustments:
Distributions received from equity investments in real estate in excess of equity income, net			1,600				2,265				5
Distributions paid to noncontrolling interests, net			(12,547	)			(11,474	)			(52	)
Changes in working capital			(8,929	)			(2,745	)			(1,056	)
Adjusted cash flow from operating activities		$	48,099			$	20,286			$	3,340
Distributions declared (weighted average share basis)		$	70,965			$	34,388			$	9,635

While we believe that FFO, AFFO and Adjusted cash flow from operating activities are important supplemental measures, they should not be considered as alternatives to net income as an indication of a company’s operating performance or to cash flow from operating activities as a measure of liquidity. These non-GAAP measures should be used in conjunction with net income and cash flow from operating activities as defined by GAAP. FFO, AFFO and Adjusted cash flow from operating activities, or similarly titled measures disclosed by other REITs, may not be comparable to our FFO, AFFO and Adjusted cash flow from operating activities measures.

Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.

Market Risks

Market risk is the exposure to loss resulting from changes in interest rates, foreign currency exchange rates and equity prices. The primary risks to which we are exposed are interest rate risk and foreign currency exchange risk. We are also exposed to market risk as a result of concentrations in certain tenant industries as we have a limited number of investments. We regularly monitor our portfolio to assess potential concentrations of market risk as we make additional investments. As we invest the proceeds of our offering, we will seek to ensure that our portfolio is reasonably well diversified and does not contain any unusual concentration of market risks.

We do not generally use derivative financial instruments to manage foreign currency exchange rate risk exposure and do not use derivative instruments to hedge credit/market risks or for speculative purposes. However, from time to time, we may enter into foreign currency forward contracts to hedge our foreign currency cash flow exposures.

Interest Rate Risk

The value of our real estate, related fixed-rate debt obligations and CMBS investments are subject to fluctuation based on changes in interest rates. The value of our real estate is also subject to fluctuations based on local and regional economic conditions and changes in the creditworthiness of lessees, all of which may affect our ability to refinance property-level mortgage debt when balloon payments are scheduled. Interest rates are highly sensitive to many factors, including governmental monetary and tax policies, domestic and international economic and political conditions, and other factors beyond our control. An increase in interest rates would likely cause the value of our owned assets to decrease. Increases in interest rates may also have an impact on the credit profile of certain tenants.

We own CMBS that are fully collateralized by a portfolio of commercial mortgages or commercial mortgage-related securities to the extent consistent with the requirements for qualification as a REIT. CMBS are instruments that directly or indirectly represent a participation in, or are secured by and payable from, one or more mortgage loans secured by commercial real estate. In most cases, CMBS distribute principal and interest payments on the mortgages to investors. Interest rates on these instruments can be fixed or variable. Some classes of CMBS may be entitled to receive mortgage prepayments before other classes do. Therefore, the prepayment risk for a particular instrument may be different than for other CMBS. The value of our CMBS investments is also subject to fluctuation based on changes in interest rates, economic conditions and the creditworthiness of lessees at the mortgaged properties.

		CPA®:17 2010 10-K — 52

Although we have not yet experienced any reductions in cash flows from our CMBS investments, we expect that we will experience credit losses and loan defaults on them. Such defaults could have an adverse effect on the spreads between our interest earning assets and interest bearing liabilities. During the fourth quarter of 2009, we recognized other-than-temporary impairment charges totaling $17.1 million related to our CMBS investments, of which $15.1 million related to expected credit losses and $1.5 million related to non-credit factors. At December 31, 2010, our CMBS investments had a carrying value of $3.8 million, which reflects the impact of these impairment charges (Note 7).

We are exposed to the impact of interest rate changes primarily through our borrowing activities. To limit this exposure, we attempt to obtain non-recourse mortgage financing on a long-term, fixed-rate basis. However, from time to time, we or our venture partners may obtain variable-rate mortgage loans and, as such, may enter into interest rate swap agreements or interest rate cap agreements with lenders that effectively convert the variable-rate debt service obligations of the loan to a fixed-rate. Interest rate swaps are agreements in which one party exchanges a stream of interest payments for a counterparty’s stream of cash flow over a specific period, and interest rate caps limit the borrowing rate of variable-rate debt obligations while allowing participants to share in downward shifts in interest rates. These interest rate swaps and caps are derivative instruments designated as cash flow hedges on the forecasted interest payments on the debt obligation. The notional, or face, amount on which the swaps or caps are based is not exchanged. Our objective in using such derivatives is to limit our exposure to interest rate movements. At December 31, 2010, we estimate that the net fair value of our interest rate cap and interest rate swaps, which are included in Other assets, net and Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities, respectively, in the consolidated financial statements, was in a net liability position of $0.4 million, inclusive of amounts attributable to noncontrolling interests of $0.3 million (Note 9).

In connection with a German investment in August 2008, a venture in which we and an affiliate have 67% and 33% interests, respectively, and which we consolidate, obtained a participation right in an interest rate swap obtained by the lender of the non-recourse mortgage financing on the transaction. This participation right is deemed to be an embedded credit derivative. This derivative instrument had no fair value at December 31, 2010.

At December 31, 2010, all of our debt either bore interest at fixed-rates, was swapped to a fixed-rate or was subject to an interest rate cap. The estimated fair value of these instruments is affected by changes in market interest rates. The annual interest rates on our fixed-rate debt at December 31, 2010 ranged from 4.5% to 8.0%. The annual interest rates on our variable-rate debt at December 31, 2010 ranged from 5.1% to 6.6%. Our debt obligations are more fully described in Financial Condition in Item 7 above. The following table presents principal cash flows based upon expected maturity dates of our debt obligations outstanding at December 31, 2010 (in thousands):

		2011				2012				2013				2014				2015				Thereafter				Total				Fair value
Fixed rate debt		$	8,341			$	9,205			$	10,791			$	11,816			$	55,105			$	420,845			$	516,103			$	522,851
Variable rate debt		$	3,189			$	3,324			$	3,465			$	109,011			$	576			$	31,810			$	151,375			$	151,374

A decrease or increase in interest rates of 1% would change the estimated fair value of such debt at December 31, 2010 by an aggregate increase of $33.6 million or an aggregate decrease of $31.1 million, respectively. This debt is generally not subject to short-term fluctuations in interest rates. Annual interest expense on our variable-rate debt that does not bear interest at fixed-rates at December 31, 2010 would increase or decrease by $1.5 million for each respective 1% change in annual interest rates.

Foreign Currency Exchange Rate Risk

We own investments in the European Union, and as a result are subject to risk from the effects of exchange rate movements, primarily in the Euro and, to a lesser extent, the British Pound Sterling, which may affect future costs and cash flows. Although all of our foreign investments through the fourth quarter of 2010 were conducted in these currencies, we are likely to conduct business in other currencies in the future as we seek to invest funds from our offering internationally. We manage foreign currency exchange rate movements by generally placing both our debt obligations to the lender and the tenant’s rental obligations to us in the same currency. We are generally a net receiver of these currencies (we receive more cash than we pay out), and therefore our foreign operations benefit from a weaker U.S. dollar, and are adversely affected by a stronger U.S. dollar, relative to the foreign currency. We recognized realized foreign currency transaction gains of $0.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2010. These losses are included in Other income and (expenses) in the consolidated financial statements and were primarily due to changes in the value of the foreign currency on accrued interest receivable on notes receivable from consolidated subsidiaries.

We enter into foreign currency forward contracts to hedge certain of our foreign currency cash flow exposures. A foreign currency forward contract is a commitment to deliver a certain amount of currency at a certain price on a specific date in the future. By entering into these instruments, we are locked into a future currency exchange rate, which limits our exposure to the movement in foreign currency exchange rates. The estimated fair value of our foreign currency forward contract, which is included in Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities in the consolidated financial statements, was $1.1 million at December 31, 2010.

		CPA®:17 2010 10-K — 53

We have obtained non-recourse mortgage financing in the local currency. To the extent that currency fluctuations increase or decrease rental revenues as translated to dollars, the change in debt service, as translated to dollars, will partially offset the effect of fluctuations in revenue and, to some extent, mitigate the risk from changes in foreign currency rates.

Scheduled future minimum rents, exclusive of renewals, under non-cancelable operating leases for our foreign real estate operations during each of the next five years and thereafter, are as follows (in thousands):

Lease Revenues(a)		2011				2012				2013				2014				2015				Thereafter				Total
Euro		$	35,814			$	35,926			$	35,926			$	35,926			$	35,926			$	478,686			$	658,204
British pound sterling			5,385				5,386				5,386				5,386				5,385				80,900				107,828
Canadian dollar			1,384				1,384				1,384				1,384				1,384				23,849				30,769
		$	42,583			$	42,696			$	42,696			$	42,696			$	42,695			$	583,435			$	796,801

Scheduled debt service payments (principal and interest) for mortgage notes payable for our foreign operations during each of the next five years and thereafter, are as follows (in thousands):

Debt service(a) (b)		2011				2012				2013				2014				2015				Thereafter				Total
Euro		$	16,878			$	17,082			$	17,216			$	17,233			$	60,578			$	142,011			$	270,998