ONVIA INC - FORM 10-K - March 16, 2011

Attached files

file	filename
EX-10.16 - 2011 MANAGEMENT INCENTIVE PLAN - ONVIA INC	mip2011.htm
EX-23.1 - CONSENT - ONVIA INC	concent.htm
EX-31.2 - CERTIFICATION 302 C.WAY - ONVIA INC	cert302way.htm
EX-32.2 - CERTIFICATION 906 C.WAY - ONVIA INC	cert906way.htm
EX-10.17 - 2011 VARIABLE COMPENSATION PLAN FOR IRVINE ALPERT - ONVIA INC	compplanirv.htm
EX-31.1 - CERTIFICATION 302 H.RINER - ONVIA INC	cert302riner.htm
EX-32.1 - CERTIFICATION 906 H.RINER - ONVIA INC	cert906riner.htm

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

x	ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010

¨	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from to

Commission File Number 000-29609

ONVIA, INC.

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)


Delaware	91-1859172
(State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization)	(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

509 Olive Way, Suite 400, Seattle, Washington 98101

(Address of Principal Executive Offices)

(206) 282-5170

(Registrant’s Telephone Number, Including Area Code)

Securities Registered Pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Title of each class		Name of exchange on which registered
Common Stock, $.0001 par value per share		The NASDAQ Capital Market

Securities Registered Pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

None

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes ¨ No x

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes ¨ No x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding twelve months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes ¨ No ¨

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of the registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer ¨ Accelerated filer ¨ Non-accelerated filer ¨ Smaller reporting company x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No x

The aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant, based on the closing price on June 30, 2010, as reported on the NASDAQ Capital Market, was $15,887,456.

The number of shares of the registrant’s common stock outstanding at March 1, 2011 was 8,430,605.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

Portions of the registrant’s proxy statement related to its 2011 annual stockholders’ meeting to be filed subsequently are incorporated by reference into Part III of this Form 10-K

ONVIA, INC.

FORM 10-K

For the Year Ended December 31, 2010

INDEX

		PAGE
PART 1.
ITEM 1.	BUSINESS		1
ITEM 1A.	RISK FACTORS		9
ITEM 1B.	UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS		14
ITEM 2.	PROPERTIES		15
ITEM 3.	LEGAL PROCEEDINGS		15
ITEM.4.	REMOVED AND RESERVED		15
PART II.
ITEM 5.	MARKET FOR THE REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES		16
ITEM 6.	SELECTED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL DATA		17
ITEM 7.	MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS		18
ITEM 7A.	QUANTITIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK		24
ITEM 8.	CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA		26
	CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS		26
	CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND COMPREHENSIVE LOSS		27
	CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS		28
	CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY		29
	NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS		30
ITEM 9.	CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE		43
ITEM 9A.	CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES		43
ITEM 9B.	OTHER INFORMATION		44
PART III.
ITEM 10.	DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE		45
ITEM 11.	EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION		45
ITEM 12.	SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS		45
ITEM 13.	CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE		45
ITEM 14.	PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES		45
PART IV.
ITEM 15.	EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES		46
SIGNATURES			48

PART I

CAUTIONARY STATEMENT

In addition to the historical information contained herein, the discussion and analysis in this report contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. When used in this discussion, the words “believes,” “anticipates,” “may,” “will,” “should,” “expects,” “plans,” “estimates,” “predicts,” “potential,” “continue,” “intends” or the negative of these and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements, but the absence of these words does not necessarily mean that a statement is not a forward-looking statement. Forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, statements about our plans, objectives, expectations and intentions and are subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those expected or implied by these forward-looking statements. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date of this report. Our actual results could differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements for many reasons, including the factors described under “Risk Factors”, “Business”, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and elsewhere in this report. Onvia undertakes no obligation to publicly release any revisions to these forward-looking statements that may be made to reflect events or circumstances after the date hereof or to reflect the occurrence of anticipated events. Readers are urged, however, to review the factors and risks described in reports Onvia files from time to time with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

In this report, we rely on and refer to information and statistics regarding the markets for various products. We obtained this information from third-party sources, discussions with our customers and our own estimates. We believe that these third-party sources are reliable, but we have not independently verified them and there can be no assurance that they are accurate.

ITEM 1.

BUSINESS

In this report, the words “we,” “our,” “us,” “Onvia,” or the “Company” refer to Onvia, Inc. and its wholly owned subsidiary.

Company Overview

We are a leading provider of business information and research solutions that help companies plan, market and sell to targeted public sector buyers throughout the United States, or U.S. The government to business, or gBusiness, market place is defined as the market funded by federal, state and local government spending. Our products, proprietary databases and research tools, focus on federal, state, local and educational purchasing entities. Our information helps our clients proactively track which goods and services government agencies plan to purchase, when they plan to purchase, what they actually purchase, and from whom they purchase. This business intelligence allows clients to identify new market opportunities, analyze market trends, and obtain useful information about their competitors and channel partners. We believe our business solutions provide clients with a distinct competitive advantage, increased revenue opportunities, and strategic insight into the public sector market.

Our business solutions leverage our proprietary databases, which have been compiled over more than eleven years, and include comprehensive, historical and real-time information on public sector activities unavailable elsewhere in the marketplace. Our databases provide information on over 7 million procurement related records connected to over 378,000 companies from across approximately 89,000 government agencies and purchasing offices nationwide. Thousands of records are standardized, added, formatted and classified within our database each day.

Transparency and open government initiatives continue to be a strategic priority for federal, state and local government officials. In response to this market demand, we launched the website Recovery.org to provide visibility into how federal funds distributed under the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act are flowing into local communities. As of February 14, 2011, www.Recovery.org was tracking more than 85,000 projects and an aggregate of $225 billion in government stimulus spending. Recovery.org has also attracted the attention of major business media, including National Public Radio, CNN, BusinessWeek, MSNBC, Bloomberg and USA Today, among others. Our Recovery.org website and the recognition of major business media outlets have enhanced our position as an authoritative source for government spending information and analytics.

Most of our revenues are currently generated from sales to two customer types: end users, such as business development and sales and marketing executives, and businesses that license our content for redistribution.

Onvia’s solution for businesses includes access to the Onvia Online Database, sometimes bundled with management information reports.

Subscriptions to the Onvia Online Database are typically prepaid, have a minimum term of one year and revenues are recognized ratably over the term of the subscription. Subscriptions are priced based upon the geographic range, nature of content purchased and, the number of users accessing database.

Revenue from management reports included in the bundled solution is recognized upon delivery of the report to the client if we have vendor specific objective evidence, or VSOE, of selling price. If we do not have VSOE, revenue is recognized ratably over the service period. Pricing for management information reports is generally based on one, or a combination of, the following: the number of records included in the report; the geographic range of the report; or a flat fee based on the type of report. We also generate revenue from document download services and list rental services, and these fees are recognized upon delivery of the document or list.

Revenue from businesses who license our content for resale to their own customers is classified as content license revenue. Content license contracts are generally multi-year arrangements that are invoiced on a monthly or quarterly basis, and these agreements typically have a higher annual contract value than our subscription-based services. Revenue from content license agreements is recognized ratably over the term of the agreement.

Onvia was incorporated in January 2000 in the state of Delaware. Our principal corporate office is located in Seattle, Washington. Our securities trade on The NASDAQ Capital Market under the symbol ONVI.

Industry Background

Since early 2009, government spending on goods and services has accelerated dramatically and now represents more than 40% of the gross domestic product of the United States. Government spending is expected to continue to be robust to avoid a stall in the economic recovery; however, looming federal and state budget deficits may also result in freezes or cuts to some federal and state agencies’ budgets. Smaller budgets and deficit reduction initiatives may lead to increased competition for contracts, and public sector vendors will be looking for a competitive advantage. Also, existing budgets may be reallocated to investments in emerging technologies, such as health care, clean water and renewable energy. Progressive enterprises are recognizing the substantial opportunity and the significant challenges presented by this market and are developing their own gBusiness strategies to take advantage of the opportunities available in this sector. To be successful with a gBusiness strategy, there will be added importance on businesses’ ability to proactively identify new opportunities and changes in government spending behavior in this current landscape. Businesses pursuing a gBusiness strategy may find that they are disadvantaged if they do not have insight about their market and their competitors.

Over 3.4 million businesses compete for opportunities within this highly competitive gBusiness marketplace and identifying qualified business partners and prospects is essential to a company’s success. Identifying relevant projects and partners can be difficult and companies spend a substantial amount of time and effort to locate and research new partners and opportunities to grow their gBusiness segments. The Internet provides short-term visibility into government contracting information for both government agencies and businesses alike, but does not provide the on-demand intelligence or context required to guide strategic decisions. When an opportunity is identified, more research must be performed to qualify the opportunity, including research on the agency, the decision maker, historical purchasing practices and pricing, and incumbent vendor relationships to name a few. A comprehensive view of the marketplace and of specific opportunities is necessary to prequalify opportunities, improve win rates, increase contract size and support a public sector strategic plan.

Our comprehensive government procurement database contains much of the relevant decision making information required by businesses on both a historical and real-time basis, and thousands of records are added to our database each day. Through our solutions, we provide the market intelligence a business needs to design and manage a public sector strategy, build relationships with agency buyers and private sector contractors, and target more qualified revenue opportunities. The confluence of these activities should help clients create more winning proposals, increase close rates, drive up contract size and, ultimately, increase public sector revenues.

Products and Services

Onvia’s business solutions are tailored to the business objectives of each client, and support both strategic planning and sales and marketing activities.

Strategic Planning

Core to our business solution is the Onvia Online Database which provides rich search functionality on our proprietary database of local, state and federal government agency purchasing information. Strategic users of the database can analyze purchasing trends to refine existing target markets, identify new geographic markets, and identify potential new agency buyers. Based upon the client’s business objectives, we can provide market intelligence needed for strategic planning such as:

o	Year-over-year growth rates by market or category to help understand buying trends;

o	Market growth rates to assist in business planning;

o	Distribution of state and local opportunities by sales territory to help allocate resources;

o	Competitive analysis; and

o	Seasonality and buying trends.

To further enhance the value of our planning content, Onvia launched Spending Forecast Center in June 2010, which provides insight into budgets and capital improvement plans by agencies within the top 366 Metropolitan Statistical Areas in the United States. Spending Forecast Center provides valuable, strategic information on future capital spending used by larger corporations to execute their gBusiness strategies.

Most governmental bodies, such as departments of transportation, city and county governments, and boards of education publish a plan that maps out their major initiatives and forecasts spending over the next 3-6 years. These spending forecasts generally include the name of the initiative or type of expense, timing, the funding source and the budget amount.

Businesses can use spending forecasts to inform business development, evaluate and target markets, as advance notices of projects, and for short-term business planning. We collect plans from all state, county and city government agencies, representing over 85% of all government spending. We add a powerful search tool that allows users to find plans based on keywords, as well as type of agency, location, spending focus, and other plan details.

In September 2010, Onvia launched Agency Center, the newest module in the Onvia Online Database, which helps strategic users get a past, present and future view of potential agency targets. Agency Center provides users with agencies’ procurements histories, current projects, and spending forecasts in a single application. This gives businesses an unprecedented view of agency buying patterns and plans, as well as the markets where their competitors are.

Sales and Marketing

Access to comprehensive and timely agency and procurement information helps sales and marketing organizations effectively identify and qualify government agencies, agency buyers and procurement opportunities within their target markets. Sales and marketing users of the Onvia Online Database can research project histories, agency buyer contact information, agency relationships with existing vendors, contract awardees, and can evaluate pricing for goods and services. Comprehensive information on their target market helps businesses improve decision making, enhance proposal quality, and manage agency relationships, all of which should help our clients obtain new procurement awards.

Sales and marketing users of the Agency Center application find it easier to identify and market to the government agencies that buy what they sell. Agency Center helps sales and marketing organizations to:

Identify government purchases that never go out to formal bid. Four out of five government purchases never go out to formal bid, because they fall below agencies’ purchasing thresholds. Businesses can use Agency Center to identify these projects and then register for the vendor lists agencies use to award informal, unpublished projects.

·	Search for projects in their industry, then display the agencies involved with those projects.

·	Search for agencies to target based on location, purchasing history, annual budget, and area of focus.

·	Create a saved search of the agencies they have targeted and their daily Onvia Guide will track those agencies’ buying activities, from pre-bid notices to bids and requests for proposal to contract awards.

We also can provide our sales and marketing partners with management reports to help target upcoming contract renewals, identify agency buyers, and inform the proposal development process. These solutions include:

Term Contracts – Provide clients with actionable sales information on term or continuing service contracts pending renewal at public agencies. These reports identify what contracts exist, when they are coming up for renewal, who the incumbent is and who the buyers are. With this report, our clients are able to perform an early evaluation of the opportunity so they can be more competitive with their proposals to increase their public sector business.

·	Contact Lists – Provide clients a comprehensive list of decision makers, agency procurement officers and zoning officials that can be used to develop relationships and identify potential business partners.

Winning Proposals Library – Compare and contrast winning proposals submitted by competing firms in order to gain competitive insights. Provides insight into how other companies position their qualifications and personnel, structure and format persuasive proposals, incorporate supporting materials, price goods and services, and differentiate themselves from their competitors.

Client Support

Most clients are assigned a support team familiar with the client’s specific industry. The support team is responsible for understanding the client’s business objectives, setting up profiles and saved searches, delivering customized management reporting, and training the client to query the database effectively. The partnership between the client and its Onvia support team is important to deriving value from the Onvia business solution.

Industries and Verticals

Our business solutions support the largest industry verticals, with a focus on the infrastructure verticals, which include:

·	Architecture and Engineering

·	Construction and Building Supplies

·	IT / Telecommunications

·	Professional Services

·	Operations and Maintenance Services

·	Transportation

·	Healthcare

·	Water and Energy / Alternative Energy

Within these verticals we provide hard-to-find content which supports both strategic planning and sales and marketing activities.

Comprehensive Procurement Content

Our database presents sales and marketing with a comprehensive view of a project throughout the most critical phases of the procurement lifecycle including:

·	Advance Notices – alerts businesses of projects in the early stages of the development process, before the bid or request for proposal is released in its final form, or before final zoning and planning board approval;

·	Request for proposals, request for quotes, and related amendments;

Planholders and Bidders Lists – provides competitive intelligence by presenting a list of competitors that have acquired plans, specifications, bidding documents and/or proposals for specific projects in the active bid or proposal stage, and a list of competitors who submit bids for prime contracts with the owner of the project;

·	Bid Results and Awards Information – notifies businesses of awarded bids, providing information for use in their own sales and marketing activities; and

·	Grants – supplies federal grant information critical to businesses tracking or applying for publicly-funded projects.

Strategy

Our mission is to be the strategic information partner for companies highly committed to the public sector market. We intend to achieve this mission by delivering exceptional products that offer our customers significant value in maximizing their business in the public sector market. If we are able to effectively achieve this mission, we should see increased retention rates and, ultimately, increased stockholder value. Key elements of our strategy include:

Target prospects with high lifetime value: We intend to focus our sales and marketing efforts on the prospects that fit the profile of our most valuable clients. Our history shows that organizations with certain firmographic characteristics tend to subscribe to the most valuable products and services, and have higher client satisfaction. Using our own database we plan to identify companies that have a strategic, long-term interest in the public sector market based on the volume of their bidding activity and the geographical scope of their marketing program to the government. If we are effective in targeting these companies, we expect that retention rates and the long-term profitability of our clients will improve.

·	Expand the distribution of our valuable content through channel sales programs and partnerships:

We intend to leverage our content and technology investment over a much wider market without losing our focus on our target market. We believe there are millions of businesses who leverage government procurement data but are not part of our target market. Through channel partnerships, we believe we can serve this market more economically than a direct sales model. Potential strategic partners include trade publishers, lead generation companies, database companies, franchises and business intelligence providers.

Develop and execute an enterprise sales and marketing program: We intend to develop and execute an enterprise sales program targeting the largest companies that offer the most business potential for Onvia. Our current enterprise clients derive the most value from our information services and this client segment has our highest retention rates. Prior to the release of our new database platform, it was more difficult to differentiate our products for the high end of the market. Through our new technology and database platform, we intend to provide this differentiation, a significant market opportunity for Onvia.

Enhance the strategic application of our products and research tools: Today most of our customers use our database to generate public sector sales leads. Our content and technology platform are key assets that can be leveraged to deliver additional, more strategic applications for our customers. These future applications include competitive analysis, channel partner selection and evaluation, market sizing, allocation of marketing spend, and pricing analyses. In 2011 we intend to create a Customer Advisory Board of twelve of our largest customers to give us feedback on the strategic direction of our product roadmap. We also intent to reach out to our customers with quarterly surveys, as well as harnessing their feedback on strategic product prototypes before they are launched. By focusing on the right target market and by forming a closer connection with our customers, we believe we can deliver strategic products that offer our customers significant value in maximizing their business in the public sector market.

Clients

We service our clients through two separate business channels: client subscriptions and content licenses. Client subscriptions are sold directly to businesses for internal use. At December 31, 2010, we had approximately 6,200 subscribing clients. Client subscriptions contributed approximately 86% of our revenue in 2010 and 2009. The annual contract value of client subscribers was approximately $22.0 million and $24.1 million at December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. Annual contract value is defined further below.

Our second business channel, content licenses, represents clients who incorporate our data into their own products, or resell our business intelligence directly to their customers. These clients represented approximately 9% and 10% of our revenue in 2010 and 2009, respectively. The annual contract value of our content license clients was approximately $2.1 million and $1.9 million at December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively.

We also generate revenue from fees charged for one-time management reports, document download services, and list rental services; these fees represented 5% of revenue in 2010 and 4% of revenue in 2009.

We manage the business using the following key operating metrics:

Annual Contract Value, or ACV

Annual contract value is the aggregate annual revenue value of our client base. Growth in ACV demonstrates our success in increasing the number of high value clients and upgrading existing clients to new and higher valued products. Content licenses are excluded from ACV.

Number of Clients

Number of clients represents the number of individual businesses subscribing to our products. This excludes subscribers to the Company’s entry level Metropolitan notification product.

Annual Contract Value per Client, or ACVC

Annual contract value per client is the annual contract value divided by the number of clients and indicates the average value of each of our subscriptions.

Quarterly Contract Value per Client, or QCVC

Quarterly contract value per client represents the average annual contract value of all new and renewing clients transacting during the quarter, and is a leading indicator of future annual contract value per client.

Revenue for the fourth quarter of 2010 decreased 4% to $6.5 million from $6.7 million in the previous quarter and decreased 7% from $6.9 million in the same year-ago period. For the full year 2010, revenues increased 5% to $27.0 million from $25.6 million in 2009. Sequential quarterly revenue decreased due to lower client retention rates and the transition to a targeted account sales and marketing strategy. For the full year, revenue grew year over year as the revenue recognition cycle on accounts signed in 2009 positively impacted growth rates in the first half of 2010.

Prior to July 2010, Onvia’s target market was very broad. As a result, the Company acquired many clients without an established public-sector strategy. Acquisition of these clients increased in 2009 due to enthusiasm for the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act. As a result, top-line revenue growth accelerated in 2009, but has began to decline in the second half of 2010 because these first-year, non-strategic clients are driving overall client retention below historical rates. Our revenue growth has been further impacted by lower acquisition sales as we narrow our target market and transition to our new sales and marketing strategy.

Sales Strategy

The primary objectives of our sales strategy for 2011 are to increase annual contract value, client retention and new client acquisition. To achieve these objectives we intend to:

·	Introduce new products that supplement our existing offering and appeal to potential new prospects;

·	Implement a higher touch contact strategy, particularly for our first year clients, to understand each client’s specific needs and proactively offer training on how to best leverage our services to meet those needs;

·	Increase the specialization of account management resources (by vertical and segment) and reduce the number of accounts each representative manages to deliver greater client service and increase client satisfaction; and

·	Implement a ”targeted accounts” process to identify those accounts with highest potential lifetime value and route them to the acquisition resources with the most knowledge of each prospect’s industry and demography.

Our 2011 sales strategy also has strong emphasis on performance management processes around forecasting, managing activities, and prioritizing activity around at risk clients.

We are in the process of transforming our small business sales organization from a transactional team into a consultative sales force focused on a very targeted market. We are identifying companies that have a strategic, long-term interest in the public sector, and we have verticalized our account teams by industry to better connect with our customers. The success of this strategy will be measured each quarter by the change in contract value of each new customer we acquire from the “targeted accounts” strategy.

We intend to expand our channel sales programs and partnerships. Our strategy is to leverage our content and technology investment over a much wider market without us losing our focus on our target market. Potential strategic partners include trade publishers, lead generation companies, database companies, franchises and business intelligence providers.

We also intend to expand our enterprise sales and marketing program. This program is directed to the largest companies that offer the most business potential for Onvia. Our turnaround plan is designed to build a profitable and sustainable business model to drive stockholder value and customer satisfaction.

We intend to institute a market driven product development process and expand the applications available to customers through our database. Today most of our customers use our database to generate public sector sales leads. Our content and technology platform are key assets that can be leveraged to deliver more strategic applications for our customers. These future applications may include competitive analysis, channel partner selection and evaluation, market sizing, allocation of marketing spend, and pricing analyses.

Marketing Strategy

We deploy an integrated approach to marketing by incorporating email direct marketing, collateral, search-engine marketing, event marketing, public relations, and support of sales tools.

Client retention and nurture marketing are an integral part of our strategy. Marketing programs are intended to keep our name and solutions in front of current and prospective clients in a relevant and meaningful way, through product-development updates, gBusiness best-practices advice, webinars, market outlook reports, and personalized renewal reminders, among others.

In June 2010, we launched a redesigned version of our company website, www.onvia.com, with content augmented and revamped to better support efforts of the sales team in engaging and educating prospects. Also that month, we upgraded our email campaign management and lead-routing platform to one provided by Eloqua, which allows us to execute the new lead-generation and prospect-marketing strategies described below.

In the fourth quarter of 2010, we began a transition from a transactional strategy of lead generation and prospect marketing (i.e., generating leads from companies of all sizes, regardless of whether they do business with the government) to one in which each prospect company is specifically targeted for sales outreach.

This targeted-accounts strategy aligns with the new consultative-selling approach that is now being employed by our sales account executives. Going forward into 2011, all leads will be scored by our marketing team and will then be the subject of quarterly nurturing campaigns from marketing designed to improve these prospects’ sales-readiness. Concurrently, we expect to fine-tune our search-engine marketing with new ad copy and landing pages designed to provide more leads from companies that fit our targeted-accounts criteria.

Agency Relationships

Agency partners bring value through source contributed content and by providing referrals of their business suppliers. As of December 31, 2010, we had approximately 360 active partner agencies in key metropolitan areas nationwide. We continue to sign a variety of government agencies including cities, counties, housing authorities, transportation authorities and school districts.

Technology

We support our operations and business solutions using an advanced technology platform designed to serve a large and rapidly increasing volume of web traffic in a reliable and efficient manner without critical failures. Our systems are designed to:

• Provide fast, secure and highly available visitor access to our websites;

• Validate and process client requests promptly and accurately;

• Provide timely, comprehensive and accurate management-reporting capabilities;

• Accommodate upgrades to features on our websites;

• Scale to accommodate growth in users and content;

• Provide basic redundancy in case of component failures.

Our systems use a combination of proprietary technologies and commercially available licensed technologies. The backbone of our technology infrastructure consists of database servers running Microsoft SQL Server on HP/Proliant class server hardware. The front end consists of multiple, redundant web servers that are expandable as operations grow.

Our web servers, database servers, transaction-processing servers and other core systems that conduct essential business operations are housed at a third-party offsite co-location facility. Our co-location vendor provides 24x7 monitoring and engineering support in a climate-controlled and physically secure environment and our on-call operations personnel have 24x7 access to the facility. Our data center has redundant communication lines from multiple Internet service providers and has its own emergency power and backup systems. We house most non-critical systems such as development servers, quality assurance servers, and internal application servers at our headquarters in Seattle. All our platform related servers are in the Seattle area and we do not have redundancy outside this geographical area in case of some natural calamity. The onvia.com website and the CRM system are not hosted by us: they are both remotely hosted solutions.

In addition to maintaining responsibility for the technical architecture, security and uptime of our business solutions, our technology department works closely with the sales and marketing departments to ensure that client feedback for new features is incorporated into new products and services and that our investment in new product development is in alignment with our customers’ needs and expectations.

Competition

The market for comprehensive intelligence on the gBusiness marketplace is underserved. Competitors include, to a limited extent, bid aggregators, industry analysts and government e-procurement platforms.

Our current and potential competitors include, but are not limited to, the following:

•

Information companies that target specific verticals also covered by our services, such as McGraw-Hill, Contractors Register and Input; and

•

Lead generation and bid matching companies such as FedMarket.com, BidNet and GovernmentBids.com.

We may face additional competition in the future as well-funded companies pursue new government procurement and private sector database products and services. We must differentiate ourselves by expanding our database, developing products and services with high switching costs, and maintaining a loyal base of repeat clients. To achieve this we must continually enhance our content and sources, and provide our clients with relevant, customized views of our database.

We believe that the principal competitive factors affecting our market include, but are not limited to, breadth, depth and timeliness of content, content quality, base of existing clients, and client service. In order to excel at these principal competitive factors, we strive to achieve a superior understanding of our clients, offer greater value in content and services and sustain a more efficient operating model. We believe that our current database offering compares favorably to select offerings available in the marketplace today based on the depth and history of our information, breadth of content types, and daily updates.

Seasonality

New client acquisition is subject to some modest seasonal fluctuations. The third quarter has historically been our slowest quarter for new client acquisition. The construction industry is our single largest market and historically these prospects are fulfilling contracts during the summer months and not prospecting for new work, which causes acquisition of new clients to be slower in these months. For this reason, it may not be possible to compare the performance of our business by consecutive quarters, and our quarterly results should be considered on the basis of results for the whole year or by comparing results in a quarter with the results in the same quarter for the previous year.

Intellectual Property Rights

Our future success depends in part on intellectual property rights, proprietary rights, and technology. We rely on a combination of copyright, trademark and trade secret laws, employee and third-party nondisclosure agreements and other methods to protect our proprietary rights. We seek to protect our internally developed products, documentation, and other written materials under trade secret and copyright laws, which afford only limited protection. We cannot ensure that any of our proprietary rights will be viable or of value in the future since the validity, enforceability and type of protection of proprietary rights in Internet-related industries is uncertain and still evolving.

We license and will continue to license certain products integral to services from third parties, including products that are integrated with internally developed products and used jointly to provide key content and services. These third-party product licenses may not continue to be available on commercially reasonable terms and we may not be able to successfully integrate such third-party products into our solutions.

We presently have no issued U.S. patents. It is possible that we may not develop future proprietary products or technologies that are patentable and that the patents of others will seriously harm our ability to do business.

We own the following registered trademarks in the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office: ONVIA, ONVIA and Design (current logo with orange circular design), ONVIA DOMINION, DEMANDSTAR, DEMANDSTAR.COM, QUOTEWIRE, BIDWIRE, and E-JOURNAL OF COMMERCE. We also own the following registered trademarks in Canada: ONVIA, ONVIA.COM, and ONVIA.COM and Design.

Employees

As of March 1, 2011, we had 139 employees working in the following departments: 73 in sales and marketing, 34 in research, which are included in cost of sales, 15 in technology and development and 17 in general and administrative.

None of our employees are represented by a union or collective bargaining agreement. We have never had a work stoppage and consider relations with our employees to be good.

Geographic Financial Information

During the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, substantially all of our revenues were generated from clients located in the United States or Canada, and all sales are denominated in U.S. currency. All of our long lived assets are located in the United States.

Available Information

We file with and furnish to the Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC, periodic reports, including annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, proxy and information statements, and other information, along with amendments to such reports. Our SEC filings are posted on the SEC’s Web site at http://www.sec.gov, which contains reports, proxy and information statements and other information regarding issuers that file electronically with the SEC. Materials that we file with the SEC are also available at the SEC’s Public Reference Room at 100 F Street, NE, Room 1580, Washington, DC 20549. Information regarding the operation of the Public Reference Room may be obtained by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. Our annual report on Form 10-K, all other reports and amendments filed with or furnished to the SEC, and our Code of Business Ethics and Conduct are available on the “About Onvia” section of our website at www.onvia.com as soon as reasonably practicable after we have filed them with, or furnished them to, the SEC.

ITEM 1A.

RISK FACTORS

In addition to other information in this Report, the following risk factors should be carefully considered in evaluating our business, because such factors may have a significant impact on our business, results of operations and financial condition, and could cause our stock price to decline. As a result of the risk factors set forth below and elsewhere in this Report, and the risks discussed in our other Securities and Exchange Commission filings, actual future results could differ materially from historical results or those projected in any forward-looking statements.

Risks related to our growth strategy

We may be required to increase sales and marketing expenses or change our Small and Medium Business strategy in order to achieve revenue goals if our assumptions about targeted prospects are inaccurate.

We plan to increase new client acquisition and lifetime client value by focusing our sales efforts on a targeted group of companies that we have identified as ideal fits for our products and services. We expect to divert marketing expenses from historical lead generating activities toward campaigns directed at these targeted prospects. If our assumptions about these companies and their interest level in our products and services are inaccurate, we may not be able to achieve our acquisition sales targets, and we may be required to increase our marketing spend to compensate for any shortfall in actual conversion rates versus planned conversion rates on these targeted companies.

We may fail to attract, hire and retain sales associates who can effectively communicate the value of our products to our clients and prospects, and they may be unable to achieve expected sales targets.

We are transforming our Small and Medium Business, or SMB, sales organization from a transactional sales organization to a consultative selling organization. Our hiring profile now includes prior experience in a consultative selling environment. If our existing sales associates are unable to effectively and efficiently transition to a consultative selling process, we will be unable to achieve our projected sales targets. In order to achieve these targets, our sales teams must be able to effectively communicate the value of our products to existing and potential clients. We expect to see increases in client retention rates and in new client acquisition revenue and our sales goals are aggressive.

We may not be successful in the development and execution of an enterprise sales and marketing program.

We expect to derive a significant portion of our growth from sales to larger businesses, who offer the highest lifetime value to our organization. In the past, we have attempted to grow our enterprise organization, but were not successful in achieving our goals around these initiatives. We believe we now have the right plan and people in place to execute this initiative; however, if we are unsuccessful in driving growth through this channel, our growth rates will suffer.

We may not be successful in expanding our channel sales program.

We believe there are close to 1.9 million businesses who are “casual users” of government procurement data. These businesses are not part of our new target market, and a portion of our existing client base falls into this category. We intend to focus our sales and marketing efforts on a more profitable target market of approximately 100,000 companies who are “power-users” of government procurement data. This strategy may be at the expense of lower retention rates for existing clients that are outside of this target market. We expect to partner with other companies who market to this audience of smaller businesses routinely, and can serve this market more economically than we can. If we are unsuccessful in accelerating growth in these partnerships, our growth rates will suffer.

The success of clients who are new to the public sector may impact our first year retention rates.

The collapse of the commercial development sector and the increase in government spending under the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act, have increased interest in public sector projects. Companies who have never participated in the public sector are investing in resources, such as Onvia’s services, to help them compete in this marketplace. If or when the private sector recovers, or if companies new to the public sector do not have success in this marketplace, companies new to the public sector may not continue their investment in Onvia’s services and our retention rates may suffer.

We may not be able to increase subscriptions to high value products.

We expect that a significant portion of future growth will come from increasing annual contract value per client, and we expect this to be driven by increased adoption of our high value products. Subscribers to our high value products have higher annual contract value, higher renewal rates and provide greater lifetime value to us. Failure to increase subscribership to these products would limit our future growth and adversely affect our results of operations.

If we cannot effectively satisfy clients across all targeted industry verticals, we may decide to target fewer industries, and as a result, may lose clients.

If we find that retention and acquisition rates in any of our focused verticals are not meeting expectations due to lack of bid-flow or for other reasons, we may choose to specialize in fewer industry verticals to improve client satisfaction and retention in the remaining verticals. As a result, we may lose clients in the non-core verticals. A more targeted focus on these core verticals may not generate the expected level of increased retention and acquisition.

Our competitors may develop similar technologies that are more broadly accepted in the marketplace.

The functionality in the Onvia Online Database is robust, and we expect that if adoption of this product is in line with our expectations that competitors may introduce products with similar functionality. If competitors introduce products with similar functionality or are able to more effectively market and price their products for broad customer acceptance, new client acquisition and existing client retention would be adversely impacted. If we are unable to enhance functionality or increase marketing efforts to offset challenges from competitors, we may lose market share.

Rapid advances in technology and new mediums for distributing information may diminish the value of our service offerings.

Our business model is predicated on providing access to and analysis of hard to find public and private sector information. Information in general is quickly becoming more accessible at a low cost as new distribution mediums, such as blogs, and new search technologies are developed. We may be unable to keep up with the rapid advances in information collection, and new technologies and mediums may be developed that commoditize the value of our services. If this were to occur, our revenues would suffer.

Risks related to our new product strategy

We may fail to introduce new content and products that are broadly accepted by clients, and there may be delays in the introduction of these tools and products.

We expect to introduce new content in 2011. If client acceptance and adoption of these new products is below our expectations, projected growth rates and client acquisition and retention goals may not be achieved, and financial results would be harmed. We expect to utilize internally developed technology and technology licensed from third parties for the development of new tools and content. If we are unable to develop or acquire the required technology on time, or at all, or if the launch of these new products is delayed for any other reason beyond our anticipated launch dates, projected growth rates may not be achieved.

We may be unable to control the cost of ongoing content collection or the cost of collecting new content types to support new product offerings.

We will need to identify cost effective sources and develop efficient collection processes for new content types required to support new product development plans. If we are unable to find new ways to collect content efficiently, and aggregate new content types in a cost effective manner, gross margins may decline.

We may improperly price new product offerings for broad client acceptance.

We may implement price increases with respect to some of our existing products in 2011. We have developed pricing strategies for our existing products, and will be required to develop new pricing strategies for planned new product launches. If existing clients do not perceive that the pricing of our products is commensurate with the value they receive from the products, or if our sales staff is unable to communicate the value of the products, particularly in light of the current economic climate, new client adoption and existing client retention would be adversely impacted.

We may overestimate the value of sales and marketing intelligence to companies in the infrastructure marketplace.

We believe there is a large unmet market need for robust public sector sales and marketing information. Our business model assumes that clients will pay an annual fee for this information and we expect increases in the annual value of these contracts in the near-term and long-term. If we have overestimated the value of this information, we will not achieve our forecasted revenue goals.

Financial, economic and market risks

Utilization of our net operating loss carryforwards may be subject to annual limitations under the Internal Revenue Code.

We have substantial net operating loss carryforwards (“NOLs”) that could be used to offset future tax liabilities arising from future taxable income. We are currently analyzing whether an “ownership change” has occurred, as defined under Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (which is generally a greater than a 50 percentage point increase by certain “5% shareholders” over a rolling three-year period). Section 382 imposes an annual limitation on the utilization of deferred tax assets, such as NOLs and other tax attributes, once an ownership change has occurred. Depending on the size of the annual limitation (which is, in part, a function of our market capitalization at the time of the ownership change) and the remaining carryforward period of the tax assets (U.S. federal net operating losses generally may be carried forward for a period of 20 years), we could realize a permanent loss of a portion of our U.S. federal and state deferred tax assets and certain built-in losses that have not been recognized for tax purposes.

We regularly review our deferred tax assets for recoverability based on a history of earnings, expectations for future earnings and expected timing of reversals of temporary differences. Realization of deferred tax assets ultimately depends on the existence of sufficient taxable income, including taxable income in prior carryback years, as well as future taxable income. It is possible that we could ultimately lose a significant portion of our deferred tax assets, including as a result of an “ownership change” under Section 382 of the Code, which could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition. If we determine that we will be unable to realize all or part of the net deferred tax asset, we would adjust this deferred tax asset, which would negatively impact our financial condition and results of operations.

We may not be able to generate positive cash flows from operations.

We have not yet demonstrated that we are able to generate positive cash flow from operations on a consistent year over year and quarter over quarter basis, and our business is subject to some seasonal fluctuations. Due to these seasonal fluctuations and limited performance history on client adoption of new products, we may not be able to achieve positive cash flow from operations in the near-term.

Our quarterly financial results are subject to fluctuations that may make it difficult to forecast future performance.

We have experienced some seasonal fluctuations in our business, reflecting a combination of seasonal trends for the services and products we offer, as well as seasonal trends in the buying habits of target business clients and government agencies. Operating results may continue to vary significantly from quarter to quarter, making it difficult to formulate meaningful comparisons of results between quarters. A significant portion of our subscription revenue for a particular quarter is derived from transactions that are initiated in previous quarters, because revenue is generally recognized ratably over the subscription term.

Our current and future levels of operating expenses and capital expenditures are based largely on our growth plans and estimates of future revenue. These expenditure levels are, to a large extent, fixed in the short term. We may not be able to adjust spending in a timely manner to compensate for any unexpected revenue shortfall, and any significant shortfall in revenue relative to planned expenditures could harm our business and results of operations.

We implemented anti-takeover provisions that may discourage takeover attempts and depress the market price of our stock.

Provisions of our certificate of incorporation and bylaws, as well as provisions of Delaware law, the state of our incorporation, can have the effect of making it difficult for a third-party to acquire us, even if doing so would be beneficial to our stockholders. These provisions include:

•

the classification of our Board of Directors into three classes so that the directors serve staggered three-year terms, which may make it difficult for a potential acquirer to gain control of our Board;

•

authorizing the issuance of shares of undesignated preferred stock without a vote of stockholders; and

•

non-cumulative voting for the election of directors.

In addition, in 2002, our Board of Directors adopted a Stockholders’ Rights Agreement, designed to protect stockholder interests in the event of an unsolicited takeover attempt by distributing one preferred stock purchase right for each outstanding share of common stock. The Stockholders’ Rights Agreement may make it more difficult for a third-party to acquire us.

Political pressure to reduce federal and state spending as a result of federal deficits and state budget shortfalls may lead to reduced spending by government agencies

Should agencies reduce spending, there may be fewer revenue opportunities to deliver to our clients. Existing clients that leverage our products primarily for new sales leads may perceive a drop in opportunities as reduction in their return on investment, which could lead to reduced retention rates. In addition, prospects considering an investment in our products may perceive a decline in government spending as a signal that there will be fewer opportunities and they may decide against purchasing a business intelligence solution, or may decide against pursuing a gBusiness strategy all together, which would negatively impact new client acquisition.

Operational risks

We may not effectively implement new technologies, and new product functionality could fail to perform as designed.

We periodically release products that employ new search technologies and complex database architecture in new and innovative ways. These technologies are usually built in house, or purchased from third party vendors and reengineered to meet our operational needs. If the creative application of these technologies does not work as planned or if we implement these new technologies poorly or in incompatible ways, our new products and services may not function properly, delivery of our products could be disrupted or delayed and our client retention and new client acquisition may suffer.

System failures could cause an interruption in the services of our network and impact our ability to compile information and deliver our products to clients.

Any system failure that causes an interruption in the service of our suite of products, disrupts our ability to aggregate, organize and publish new content, or reduces timely access to and delivery of our content could result in client dissatisfaction, which would impact client acquisition and retention rates. Further, prolonged or ongoing performance problems on our web sites or our application servers, which support bid creation and distribution, could damage our reputation and result in the permanent loss of clients. In the past, system interruptions have made our web sites and application servers totally unavailable, slowed their response time or prevented us from making service available to clients. These problems may occur again in the future.

We may not have sufficient business interruption insurance to cover losses from major interruptions. We deployed our primary business application servers to a secure offsite facility with backup utility power and redundant Internet connectivity in 2008. Our current physical and virtual tape drive based disaster recovery systems are not capable of recovering core business functionality in less than a period of several days depending on severity in the event of a disaster scenario at the offsite facility. Production Information Technology and Research department functions will be operational in the event of a local building disaster so that delivery of our products will not be significantly interrupted as long as the offsite facility is still operational. Our disaster recovery plan does not yet include automated failover of product distribution-related systems, requiring extensive manual intervention to complete the recovery process which could result in prolonged service interruptions and ultimately lower client satisfaction. In addition, all our platform related servers are in the Seattle area and we do not have redundancy outside this geographical area in case of some natural calamity.

Our current technology infrastructure and network software systems may be unable to accommodate our anticipated growth, and we may require a significant investment in these systems to accommodate performance and storage requirements of new and planned products.

Expansion of the historical content contained in our Onvia Online Database and future product offerings have and will place significant additional demands on the network and on our database. We add thousands of records to our database each day, which has required us to expand the storage capacity of the database. If new content types or product introductions change current network and database requirements or if growth in our client base exceeds our expectations, we may be required to make significant investments to upgrade our systems to accommodate such changes, which could negatively impact our cash flows and results of operations. We may not be successful in our efforts to upgrade our systems, or if we do successfully upgrade our systems, we may not do so on time and within budget. Failure to achieve a stable technological platform in time to handle increasing network traffic may discourage potential clients from using our network.

We may not be able to retain the services of our executive officers, directors, senior managers and other key employees, which would harm our business.

Our business and operations are substantially dependent on the performance of senior management, directors and key employees. The loss and inability to replace any of these employees or directors would likely harm our business.

Political, social or environmental conditions in off-shore locations may impact the collection and delivery of our content and/or development of new products.

Portions of our content are aggregated and/or formatted by off-shore vendors. Delivery of that content may be impacted by local political, social or environmental conditions, which may result in delayed delivery to clients resulting in client dissatisfaction.

We also outsource portions of the development of new products to off-shore vendors. Political, social or environmental conditions in those locations may result in delays of new product introductions.

We may be unable to effectively monitor and prevent unauthorized redistribution of our published information.

In the past we have identified a number of entities that have redistributed proprietary information without authorization and against our terms of use. We have been and will continue to be aggressive about monitoring and combating such unauthorized use, and are considering technological avenues for blocking such users from our database. However, if we fail to effectively combat such unauthorized use, our business could be harmed.

Our services and products depend upon the continued availability of licensed technology from third parties, and we may not be able to obtain those licenses on commercially reasonable terms, or at all.

We license, and will continue to license, technology integral to our services and products from third parties. If we are unable to acquire or retain key third-party product licenses or integrate the related third-party products into our network services, our service and product development may be delayed. We also expect to acquire new licenses in the future as our business grows and technology evolves. We may not be able to obtain these licenses on commercially reasonable terms, or at all.

Increased blocking of our emails could negatively impact client satisfaction with our products and could inhibit the effectiveness of our marketing efforts.

Portions of our content are currently delivered in the form of an attached file via email. Some network administrators could flag and block emails from us due to increased filtering of email attachments as a result of the threat of email borne viruses or unwanted “spam” or for other reasons. We also conduct marketing campaigns to our customer base and occasionally these campaigns are done via email. Excessive filtering of our emails could negatively impact client satisfaction and could inhibit our marketing efforts.

Regulatory, judicial or legislative risks

Any settlement or claim awarded against us in our ongoing litigation matters could negatively impact operating results.

We are defending against the litigation matters as referred to in the “Legal Proceedings” section in Note 3 of this Report. While we believe we have a strong defense in this case, we cannot be certain that the outcome of the case will be favorable to us. A settlement or award in this or other potential suits could negatively impact our operating results. It is also possible that defense of this and future claims may result in a significant diversion of management attention.

Future regulations could be enacted that either directly restrict our business or indirectly impact our business by limiting the growth of e-commerce.

We are subject to laws and regulations governing the Internet and e-commerce. These laws and regulations may cover privacy, content, taxation, data protection, copyrights, electronic contracts and other communications, consumer protection, unencumbered Internet access to our services, the design and operations of websites, and the characteristics and quality of products and services. If enacted, unfavorable laws and regulations could limit the market for our services and offerings. Although many regulations might not apply to the business directly, we expect that laws regulating the collection or processing of personal or consumer information could indirectly affect our business. It is possible that legislation could expose companies involved in e-commerce to restrictions or liability, which could limit the growth of e-commerce generally. Legislation could hinder the growth in Internet use and decrease our acceptance as a medium for communication and commerce. If laws were enacted that made our products taxable at the state level, we may be required to pass those additional taxes along to our customers, which would increase the overall cost of our product to our end users and could impact the buying decisions of existing and potential new clients.

Our access to new content from governmental entities and other third parties may be restricted if bid aggregation on the Internet is restricted by law or regulations.

We aggregate new information from various public data sources and do not have exclusive access to this content. We cannot ensure that these data sources will continue to be available in the future. Moreover, public disclosure laws, which require governmental entities to produce bid information directly to members of the public, may negatively impact our business and reduce the value of our services to clients. The loss or the unavailability of data sources in the future, or the loss of right to distribute some of the data sources, would harm our business.

Our proprietary bid aggregation technology is integral to our success. If the process of bid aggregation becomes regulated in the future and our process for acquiring government bids is no longer cost-effective, our business will be significantly harmed. If new regulations restricting our ability to charge a fee for public bid information are enacted, our business will be significantly harmed.

ITEM 1B.

UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS

Not applicable.

ITEM 2.

PROPERTIES

Our headquarters are located in Seattle, Washington. Since January, 2008, we lease approximately 35,000 square feet in two floors of a sixteen-story office complex located at 509 Olive Way, Seattle, Washington. We believe this space is adequate to meet current and near term capacity requirements. The lease on our current office space expires in October 2015.

ITEM 3.

LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

For a discussion regarding our legal proceedings, please refer to the “Legal Proceedings” section of Note 10, “Commitments and Contingencies”, in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in this Report, which is incorporated herein by reference.

ITEM 4.

REMOVED AND RESERVED

EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT

The executive officers of the Company are as follows:

Name	Age		Position
Henry G. Riner		60	Chief Executive Officer and President
Cameron S. Way		39	Chief Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer
Naveen Rajkumar		33	Senior Vice President and Chief Information Officer
Irvine N. Alpert		59	Executive Vice President

Henry G. Riner was appointed President and Chief Executive Officer in October 2010. Mr. Riner has served as a Director of the Company since November 2010. From March 2009 until September 2010, Mr. Riner served as President and Chief Executive Officer of OSG Billing Services, an electronic bill presentment and payment company. From 2006 through 2008, Mr. Riner was President and Chief Executive Officer of CoAMS, a trade promotion information services company. From 1997 through 2005, Mr. Riner was President and Chief Executive Officer of SourceLink, a direct marketing information services company. Mr. Riner was President of UMI, a division of the Bell & Howell Company from 1994 through 1997.

Cameron S. Way has served as Chief Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer of the Company since April 2008. Mr. Way served as Chief Accounting Officer of the Company from June 2005 to April 2008, Controller from September 2001 to June 2005, Assistant Controller from December 2000 to September 2001, and Finance Manager from August 1999 to December 2000. Mr. Way was an Audit Manager with PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP from January 1999 to August 1999 prior to joining the Company.

Naveen Rajkumar has served as Senior Vice President and Chief Information Officer of the Company since August 2010. Prior to becoming Senior Vice President and Chief Information Officer, Mr. Rajkumar served as Chief Information Officer of the Company from January 2010 to July 2010. From July 1999 to December 2009, Mr.Rajkumar served Aditi Technologies in various positions, most recently as General Manager.

Irvine N. Alpert has served as Executive Vice President of the Company since July 2001. From February 1995 to July 2001, Mr. Alpert was the founder and Chief Executive Officer of ProjectGuides, Inc., an architecture, engineering, and construction market information service, which was acquired by Onvia in June 2001. From 1993 to 1995, Mr. Alpert served as President of RCI Environmental, Inc., a regional construction company.

There are no family relationships between any directors or executive officers of the Company.

PART II

ITEM 5.

MARKET FOR THE REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

Market Information

Our common stock currently trades on the NASDAQ Capital Market under the symbol “ONVI.” The table below lists the high and low closing prices per share of our common stock for each quarterly period during the past two fiscal years as reported on the NASDAQ Global Market and, since April 2009, on the NASDAQ Capital Market.

	Closing Price Range
	of Common Stock
	High		Low
Year ended December 31, 2009
First Quarter	$	4.50	$	2.90
Second Quarter		5.89		3.31
Third Quarter		6.17		5.20
Fourth Quarter		8.00		5.50

Year ended December 31, 2010
First Quarter	$	8.50	$	7.20
Second Quarter		8.00		3.79
Third Quarter		3.80		2.77
Fourth Quarter		4.63		2.91

Holders

As of March 1, 2011, there were approximately 281 holders of record of Onvia common stock. The number of record holders was determined from the records of the Company’s transfer agent and does not include the number of persons whose stock is held in nominee or “street name” accounts through brokers.

Dividends

No cash dividends were declared for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009 nor does Onvia have the intention to pay cash dividends in the foreseeable future.

Securities Authorized for Issuance under Equity Compensation Plans

We currently maintain two active compensation plans that provide for the issuance of our common stock to officers, directors, employees, and consultants. The two active compensation plans consist of the Onvia, Inc. 2008 Equity Incentive Plan, or the 2008 Plan, and the 2000 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, or ESPP, both of which have been approved by stockholders.

We also have outstanding options under the stockholder approved 2000 Directors’ Stock Option Plan, or Directors’ Plan, which expired on February 28, 2010 and under the Amended and Restated 1999 Stock Option Plan, or the 1999 Plan, which was amended and restated in September 2008 as the 2008 Plan. Options outstanding under both the Directors’ Plan and the 1999 Plan will continue to vest and become exercisable according to the original terms of the grant. However, any options that are forfeited from the Directors’ Plan subsequent to the expiration date will not be available for reissuance. Any grants forfeited from the 1999 Plan will be returned to the 2008 Plan and will be available for future issuance.

In August 2009, 49,941 warrants with an exercise price of $9.00 that were originally issued in 1999 for subordinated debt financing expired unexercised.

The following table sets forth information regarding outstanding options and shares reserved for future issuance under the 2008 Plan, the 1999 Plan, the Directors’ Plan, and the ESPP as of December 31, 2010. There were no equity plans not approved by security holders as of December 31, 2010.

Plan category	Number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options		Weighted average exercise price of outstanding options		Number of securities remaining available for future issuance
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders
Onvia, Inc. 2008 Equity Incentive Plan		357,763	$	4.01		272,735
Amended and Restated 1999 Stock Option Plan		1,303,586		8.02		-
2000 Directors' Stock Option Plan		34,000		5.15		-
Employee Stock Purchase Plan		-		N/A		509,650
Total		1,695,349	$	7.12		782,385

Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities

None.

Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

None.

Stock Price Performance Graph

The registrant is a Smaller Reporting Company and, therefore, is not required to provide the information under this item.

ITEM 6. SELECTED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL DATA

The registrant is a Smaller Reporting Company and, therefore, is not required to provide the information under this item.

ITEM 7.

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

CAUTIONARY STATEMENT

The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the Consolidate Financial Statements and accompanying Notes hereto.

Management Overview – 2010 Results and 2011 Priorities

Revenue for the fourth quarter of 2010 decreased 7% compared to the fourth quarter of 2009. Sequential quarter revenue decreased due to lower client retention rates and the transition to a targeted account sales and marketing strategy. Revenues for 2010 were $27.0 million, representing an increase of 5% over 2009. Revenue grew year over year as the revenue recognition cycle on accounts signed in 2009 positively impacted growth rates in the first half of 2010.

Annual contract value, or ACV, represents the aggregate annual revenue value of the Company’s subscription contracts. ACV decreased 4% to $22.0 million from $23.0 million in the previous quarter, and 9% from $24.1 million in the same year-ago quarter. A significant driver of ACV is annual contract value per client, or ACVC, which grew to $3,558, up 20% compared to the fourth quarter of 2009. ACVC improved in 2010, in part by targeting more strategic clients and because non-renewals were weighted toward non-strategic companies with lower contract values.

Annual net loss was $806,000 for 2010, compared to a net loss of $547,000 for 2009. The increase in net loss was primarily attributable to the $969,000 internal use software abandonment which was partially offset by a $733,000 improvement in cost of revenue discussed in more detail in the “Consolidated Results of Operations” section below.

At December 31, 2010, we had 6,200 clients, a decrease of 23% compared to 8,100 at December 31, 2009. The year-over-year decrease in the customer base is primarily attributed to a decline in client retention rates among non-strategic clients, and lower client acquisition rates as we transition to a targeted accounts sales model. Approximately 72% of lost clients were in non-strategic markets.

We are focused on the following priorities for 2011:

Reduce costs – We have rationalized our cost structure and have identified $1.9 million in annual cost reductions, much of which is reflected in our fourth quarter run-rate. In addition, we completed a very significant infrastructure investment cycle in the fourth quarter of 2010 and we are now positioned to reduce our capital investment by $2.0 million in 2011. These activities are expected to reduce total cash spending by nearly $4.0 million in 2011 compared to the prior year;

Transform our Small and Medium Business, or SMB, sales organization – Previously, this team was a transactional team, and we are transforming it into a consultative sales force focused on a very targeted market. We are identifying companies that have a strategic, long-term interest in the public sector, and we have vertically organized our account teams by industry to better connect with our customers. The success of this strategy will be measured each quarter by the change in contract value for each new customer we acquire from the “targeted accounts” strategy;

Expand distribution of Onvia content through channel sales programs and partnerships – Our strategy is to leverage our content and technology investment over a much wider market without losing our focus on our target market. Potential strategic partners include trade publishers, lead generation companies, database companies, franchises and business intelligence providers. The success of this initiative will be measured by our ability to grow content license contract value and to sign up new strategic partnerships in 2011;

Develop and execute an enterprise sales and marketing program – This program is directed to the largest companies that offer the most business potential for Onvia. On February 28, 2011, John Besteman joined us as our VP of Enterprise Sales. John has an extensive background in both enterprise selling and the information services industry and we expect John to help us expand our enterprise business in the years ahead; and

Institute a market-driven product development process and expand the applications available to our customers – Today most of our customers use our database to generate public-sector sales leads. Our content and technology platform are key assets that can be leveraged to deliver more strategic applications for our customers. These future applications may include competitive analysis, channel partner selection and evaluation, market sizing, allocation of marketing spend, and pricing analyses.

This plan is designed to build a profitable and sustainable business model to drive stockholder value and customer satisfaction. We will report our progress on these five initiatives every quarter.

Application of Critical Accounting Policies and Management Estimates

Our discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations are based upon our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. The preparation of these financial statements requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related disclosure of commitments and contingencies. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ significantly from our estimates. In addition, any significant unanticipated changes in any of our assumptions could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations. We believe the following are our most significant accounting policies and estimates:

Revenue Recognition

Our revenues are primarily generated from subscriptions, content licenses and management reports. Our subscriptions are generally annual contracts; however, we also offer, on a limited basis, extended multi-year contracts to our subscription clients, and content licenses are generally multi-year agreements. Subscription and content licenses are recognized ratably over the term of the agreement. We also generate revenue from fees charged for management reports, document download services, and list rental services, and revenue from these types of services is recognized upon delivery, or, if report refreshes are included, ratably over the service period.

Our subscription services and management information reports are also sold together as a bundled offering. Pursuant to the provisions of Accounting Standard Codification, or ASC, 605-25 Revenue Recognition, we allocate revenue from these bundled sales ratably between the subscription services and the management reports based on their relative fair values, which are consistent with established list prices for those offerings. In October 2009, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update, or ASU, No. 2009-13, Multiple-Deliverable Revenue Arrangements. This ASU amends the criteria for separating deliverables, and measuring and allocating arrangement consideration to one or more units of accounting. The amendments also establish a selling price hierarchy for determining the selling price of a deliverable. We have adopted the amendments in this ASU for arrangements entered into or materially modified on or after January 1, 2011. We do not believe adoption will materially impact reported revenue.

Unearned revenue consists of payments received for prepaid subscriptions, as well as the invoiced, but unpaid, portion of subscriptions and content licenses whose terms extend into periods beyond the balance sheet date.

Internal Use Software

We account for the costs to develop or obtain software for internal use in accordance with ASC 350-40, Intangibles – Goodwill and Other subtopic Internal-Use Software. As a result, we capitalize qualifying computer software costs incurred during the “application development stage.” Amortization of these costs begins once the product is ready for its intended use. These capitalized software costs are amortized on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful life of the product, typically 3 to 5 years. The amount of costs capitalized within any period is dependent on the nature of software development activities and projects in each period.

During 2010 we abandoned $969,000 related to internal use software. During the second quarter of 2010, we abandoned three internal use software projects. The abandoned assets related to code developed for our commercial sector information, search engine marketing, and internal cross-system integration. During the second quarter, management made the decision to no longer append contact and project specific information to our commercial sector content. This decision was made as a result of our change to focus exclusively on the gBusiness sector and to no longer position private sector data as a differentiator within our gBusiness solution. Without this actionable contact and project specific information, we do not believe there is future value associated with this content. This project represents 93% of the total abandoned costs. The $969,000 in abandonments represents the full unamortized value of these assets and these amounts are included in operating expenses under the general and administrative category in the year ended December 31, 2010.

Non-cash Stock-Based Compensation

We account for stock-based compensation according to the provisions of ASC 718 Compensation – Stock Compensation, which requires measurement of compensation cost for all stock-based awards at fair value on the date of grant and recognition of stock-based compensation cost over the requisite service period for awards expected to vest. The fair value of our stock options is determined using the Black-Scholes valuation model. Such value is recognized as expense over the service period, net of estimated forfeitures. The estimation of stock awards that will ultimately vest requires judgment, and to the extent actual results or updated estimates differ from our current estimates, such amounts will be recorded as a cumulative adjustment in the period estimates are revised. We consider many factors when estimating expected forfeitures, including employee class and historical experience. There is also significant judgment required in the estimation of the valuation assumptions used to determine the fair value of options granted. Please refer to the discussion of valuation assumptions in Note 2 of the “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements” of this Report for additional information on the estimation of these variables. Actual results, and future changes in estimates, may differ substantially from our current estimates.

Accounts Receivable and Allowance for Doubtful Accounts

We record accounts receivable for the invoiced portion of our contracts once we have a signed agreement and amounts are billable under the contract. All of our subscription contracts are non-cancellable upon activation. We do not record an asset for the unbilled or unearned portion of our contracts. Accounts receivable are recorded at their net realizable value, after deducting an allowance for doubtful accounts. Such allowances are determined based on a review of an aging of accounts and reflect either specific accounts or estimates based on historical incurred losses. If the financial condition of our clients were to deteriorate, resulting in an impairment of their ability to make payments, additional allowances may be required, and our ability to recognize sales to certain clients may be affected.

Consolidated Results of Operations

The following table provides our selected consolidated results of operations for the indicated periods (in thousands of dollars and as a percentage of total revenue):

	Years Ended December 31,
	2010					2009
Revenue:
Subscription	$	23,270		86.2	%	$	22,063		86.1	%
Content license		2,481		9.2	%		2,460		9.6	%
Management information reports		897		3.3	%		863		3.4	%
Other		344		1.3	%		251		0.9	%
Total revenue		26,992		100.0	%		25,637		100.0	%

Cost of revenue		3,946		14.6	%		4,679		18.3	%

Gross margin		23,046		85.4	%		20,958		81.7	%

Operating expenses:
Sales and marketing expenses		13,994		51.8	%		13,909		54.1	%
Technology and development expenses		3,769		14.0	%		3,096		12.1	%
General and administrative expenses		6,177		22.9	%		4,552		17.8	%
Total operating expenses		23,940		88.7	%		21,557		84.0	%
Loss from operations		(894	)	(3.3	%)		(599	)	(2.3	%)
Interest and other income, net		88		0.3	%		52		0.2	%

Net loss	$	(806	)	(3.0	%)	$	(547	)	(2.1	%)

Comparison of Years Ended December 31, 2010 and 2009

Revenue

Revenue increased 5% to $27.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2010, compared to $25.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2009. Revenue growth was driven by the revenue recognition cycle on accounts signed in 2009, which positively impacted growth rates in the first half of 2010. Prior to July 2010, Onvia’s target market was very broad. As a result, the Company acquired many clients without an established public-sector trategy. Acquisition of these clients increased in 2009 due to enthusiasm for the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act. As a result, top-line revenue growth accelerated in 2009, but has subsequently declined because these first-year, non-strategic clients are driving overall client retention below historical rates. Our revenue growth has been further impacted by lower acquisition sales as we narrow our target market and transition to our new sales and marketing strategy.

Cost of Revenue

Cost of revenues for the twelve months ended December 31, 2010 and 2009 were as follows (in thousands):

							Increase / (Decrease)
	2010			2009			Amount			Percent
Twelve months ended December 31,	$	3,946		$	4,679		$	(733	)		(16	%)
Percentage of Revenue		15	%		18	%

Our cost of revenue primarily represents payroll-related expenses associated with the research and aggregation of the data in our proprietary database and third-party content fees, and also includes credit card processing fees. The decrease for the comparable periods was primarily due to decreases of $549,000 in payroll-related expenses, $113,000 decrease in third party content costs due to a change in our production systems, essentially replacing full time staff with task based services from specialized vendors, and $80,000 in credit cards fees. Payroll expenses decreased as a result of a decline in weighted average headcount in our content team to 37 during 2010, compared to 45 in 2009. Headcount decreased as a result of higher utilization of third-party content aggregators.

Sales and Marketing

Sales and marketing expenses for the twelve months ended December 31, 2010 and 2009 were as follows (in thousands):

							Increase / (Decrease)
	2010			2009			Amount		Percent
Twelve months ended December 31,	$	13,994		$	13,909		$	85		1	%
Percentage of Revenue		52	%		54	%

The increase in expenses for the comparable periods is comprised of $476,000 in amortization expense due to the launch of several new internally developed technology platforms and products; $301,000 in marketing costs primarily as a result of increased search engine marketing costs, non-capitalizable website costs and increased public relations activity; $136,000 in travel and entertainment due to increased travel to enterprise customers, and $96,000 in severance expenses due to the departure of our Senior Vice President of Sales and Chief Solution Officer. These increases were offset by a $1.1 million decrease in commission expenses due to lower sales in the last three quarters of 2010 compared to the same period in 2009. Weighted average headcount in our sales and marketing teams was 90 during the twelve months ended December 31, 2010, compared to 100 in the same period in 2009.

Technology and Development

Technology and development expenses for the twelve months ended December 31, 2010 and 2009 were as follows (in thousands):

							Increase / (Decrease)
	2010			2009			Amount		Percent
Twelve months ended December 31,	$	3,769		$	3,096		$	673		22	%
Percentage of Revenue		14	%		12	%

The increase in expenses for the comparable twelve month periods is attributed to: an increase of $307,000 in contract labor for post-implementation maintenance activities on the new technology platform and products, which are not capitalizable, an increase of $242,000 in amortization from internal use software and software licenses related to the launch of new platforms and products, and a $164,000 reduction in capitalization of payroll related internal use software costs. Weighted average headcount in our technology and development teams was 19 during the year of 2010, compared to 18 in 2009.

General and Administrative

General and administrative expenses for the twelve months ended December 31, 2010 and 2009 were as follows (in thousands):

							Increase / (Decrease)
	2010			2009			Amount		Percent
Twelve months ended December 31,	$	6,177		$	4,552		$	1,625		36	%
Percentage of Revenue		23	%		18	%

The increase in expenses is primarily related to $969,000 internal use software abandonment, an increase of $565,000 in payroll related costs due to an increase in headcount, and an increase of $541,000 in severance expenses primarily related to our former Chief Executive Officer’s transition agreement, and separation agreements for our former Senior VP of Technology, Production and Information. Weighted average headcount in this group was 19 and 13 in the twelve months ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. The increase in headcount is partially attributable to a reclassification of two employees who were included in Sales and Marketing and one employee who was included in Technology and Development in the prior period. These increases were offset by a decrease of $377,000 in business taxes mostly due to a Washington state tax refund associated with a reapportionment of prior year in-state revenues, and a $136,000 decrease in bad debt expense.

Other Income, Net

Other income, net consists of interest earned on our investment accounts, interest expense associated with capital leases and other miscellaneous income or expense. Other income, net was $88,000, and $52,000 for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. During 2009, we moved a portion of our investments into FDIC insured or U.S. government backed short-term securities, which carry a slightly higher return than the money market funds.

Provision for Income Taxes

We account for income taxes using the asset and liability method. Under this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the estimated future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases, and for net operating loss, or NOL, carryforwards. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled.

Utilization of the NOL carryforwards may be subject to a substantial annual limitation due to ownership change limitations that may have occurred previously or that could occur in the future provided by Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”). These ownership changes may limit the amount of NOL carryforwards that can be utilized annually to offset future taxable income and tax, respectively. In general, an ownership change, as defined by Section 382 of the Code, results from transactions increasing the ownership of certain “5% stockholders” or public groups in the stock of a corporation by more than 50 percentage points over a three-year period.

We are in the process of performing a Section 382 analysis regarding ownership changes that may have occurred, but at this time we cannot reasonably estimate whether such a change has occurred. Any NOL carryforwards that will expire prior to utilization as a result of such limitations will be removed from deferred tax assets with a corresponding reduction of the valuation allowance.

We currently have a full valuation allowance for our deferred tax assets as the future realization of the tax benefit is not more likely than not. Based on information currently available, and until the Section 382 analysis is completed, we cannot reasonably estimate whether the unrecognized tax benefit will change significantly within the next twelve months.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Our principal sources of liquidity are cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments. Our combined cash and cash equivalents and short term investments were $10.9 million at December 31, 2010, and our working capital was $1.3 million. From December 31, 2009 to December 31, 2010, our cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments decreased by $3.4 million for the reasons described below under operating, investing and financing activities.

We have rationalized our cost structure and have identified $1.9 million in annual cost reductions, much of which is reflected in our fourth quarter run-rate. In addition, we completed a very significant infrastructure investment cycle in the fourth quarter of 2010 and we are now positioned to reduce our capital investment by $2.0 million in 2011. These activities are expected to reduce total cash spending by nearly $4.0 million in 2011 compared to the prior year.

As we continue to execute on our targeted-accounts strategy, we may experience a short-term decrease in sales and cash flow in the near term. In addition, renewal rates for non-strategic companies during 2010 were below historical rates and may remain below historical rates for this segment of our client base as we focus our efforts on medium and large businesses. We expect, however, that over the longer term, focusing on targeted accounts will result in improved retention rates and ACV and, ultimately, increased sales, cash flow and operating income. Until such time as we are able to generate recurring positive cash flow and earnings, we will utilize our revenue, cash, cash equivalents, short-term investments to fund operations.

We have established more stringent policies for granting extended payment terms for our clients in light of increasing default rates on subscriptions with these types of terms. The continuingly difficult economy has triggered an increase in requests for delayed payment terms, such as quarterly payment terms. If we reduce the availability of credit to our clients, they may refuse to purchase and our operating cash flow may be adversely impacted in the near term; however, we believe that our current cash and cash equivalents are sufficient to fund current operations for the near-term foreseeable future.

In May 2010, Michael Pickett, our former Chief Executive Officer, President and Chairman of the Board, exercised 302,979 options. Mr. Pickett surrendered 171,330 shares subject to the options to satisfy the exercise price of the options and the tax withholding obligations resulting from the exercise. The tax obligation associated with this exercise was approximately $427,000 and we settled this obligation in May 2010. This payment is presented under financing activities on the statement of cash flows. Pursuant to Mr. Pickett’s transition agreement, we made a transition payment of $250,000 on March 1, 2011.

In October, 2010, Eric T. Gillespie, our former Senior Vice President, Products, Technology and Information, resigned. Pursuant to Mr. Gillespie’s separation and release agreement, we made payments totaling $246,000 for severance and accrued but unused vacation in November 2010.

In November, 2010, Michael S. Balsam announced his resignation as Chief Strategy Officer of Onvia, effective December 31, 2010. Pursuant to Mr. Balsam’s transition services agreement he was entitled to a transition payment and accrued but unused vacation totaling $152,000, which was paid on December 31, 2010, subject to all required or agreed upon deductions and withholdings.

If we engage in merger or acquisition transactions or our overall operating plans change, we may require additional equity or debt financing to meet future working capital needs, which may have a dilutive effect on existing stockholders or may include securities that have rights, preferences or privileges senior to those of the rights of our common stock. We cannot make assurances that if additional financing is required, it will be available, or that such financing can be obtained on satisfactory terms.

Operating Activities

Net cash provided by operating activities was $1.0 million and $4.1 million for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. The year over year decrease is primarily due to a decrease in sales during 2010, which resulted in a decrease in prepaid subscriptions (deferred revenue), as well as an increase in operating expenses in 2010 as discussed above.

Investing Activities

Net cash provided by investing activities was $5.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2010, compared to net cash used by investing activities of $15.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2009.

We purchased $7.4 million in short term investments and $781,000 in long-term investments during the twelve months of 2010 compared to $15.8 million in short term investments for the same period of 2009, all of which were matured or sold in 2010. During the twelve months of 2010 we received $17.5 million from the sale and maturity of investments, compared to $3.1 million during the same period of 2009. Purchases of property and equipment and investments in our technology platform increased by $504,000 in the twelve months of 2010 compared to the same period in 2009. In addition, $135,000 of our security deposit on the lease for our corporate headquarters was returned to us in both March 2009 and March 2010.

Financing Activities

Net cash used in financing activities was $371,000 for the year ended December 31, 2010 compared $1,000 for the year ended December 31, 2009. The increase in cash used is primarily due to tax obligations associated with Mr. Pickett’s option exercise discussed above. Capital lease obligations decreased $76,000 due to the expiration of the lease in 2010.

New Accounting Pronouncements

In February 2010, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update, or ASU, No. 2010-09, Subsequent Events (Topic 855) – Amendments to Certain Recognition and Disclosure Requirements. This ASU amends Topic 855, Subsequent Events, to eliminate the requirement for SEC filers to disclose the date through which subsequent events have been evaluated. This amendment addresses concerns that the guidance in Topic 855 potentially conflicts with some of the SEC’s guidance. This update is effective for all entities and was effective upon issuance.

In January 2010, the FASB issued ASU No. 2010-06, Improving Disclosures About Fair Value Measurements, which requires reporting entities to make new disclosures about recurring or nonrecurring fair-value measurements including significant transfers into and out of Level 1 and Level 2 fair-value measurements and information on purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements on a gross basis in the reconciliation of Level 3 fair-value measurements. ASU 2010-06 is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2009, except for Level 3 reconciliation disclosures which are effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2010. We adopted the provisions related to Level 1 and Level 2 fair-value measurements in the fourth quarter of 2009. Adoption of ASU 2010-06 did not have an impact on our results of operations or financial position since we do not hold any Level 3 assets.

In October 2009, the FASB issued ASU No. 2009-13, Multiple-Deliverable Revenue Arrangements. This ASU establishes the accounting and reporting guidance for arrangements including multiple revenue-generating activities. This ASU provides amendments to the criteria for separating deliverables, and measuring and allocating arrangement consideration to one or more units of accounting. The amendments in this ASU also establish a selling price hierarchy for determining the selling price of a deliverable. Significantly enhanced disclosures are also required to provide information about a vendor’s multiple-deliverable revenue arrangements, including information about the nature and terms, significant deliverables, and its performance within arrangements. The amendments also require providing information about the significant judgments made, and changes to those judgments, and about how the application of the relative selling-price method affects the timing or amount of revenue recognition. The amendments in this ASU are effective prospectively for revenue arrangements entered into or materially modified in fiscal years beginning on or after June 15, 2010 and will become effective for us beginning January 1, 2011. We do not expect adoption to have a material impact on our results of operations.

ITEM 7A.

QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

The registrant is a Smaller Reporting Company and, therefore, is not required to provide the information under this item.

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of

Onvia, Inc.

Seattle, Washington

We audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Onvia, Inc. and subsidiary (the "Company") as of December 31, 2010 and 2009, and the related consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the two years in the period ended December 31, 2010. Our audits also included the financial statement schedule listed in the Index at Item 15. These financial statements and the financial statement schedule are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the financial statements and the financial statement schedule based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, such consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2010 and 2009, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the two years in the period ended December 31, 2010, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Also, in our opinion, such financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic consolidated financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly in all material respects the information set forth therein.

/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

Seattle, Washington

March 16, 2011

ITEM 8.

CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

ONVIA, INC.

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

DECEMBER 31, 2010 AND 2009

	December 31, 2010			December 31, 2009
ASSETS

CURRENT ASSETS:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	7,522,574		$	1,646,543
Short-term investments, available-for-sale		3,361,511			12,632,263
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $72,868 and $119,005		1,750,528			1,687,664
Prepaid expenses and other current assets, current portion		593,821			716,219
Reimbursable tenant improvements		-			147,260
Security deposits, current portion		134,517			134,517

Total current assets		13,362,951			16,964,466

LONG TERM ASSETS:
Property and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation		1,419,244			1,225,836
Reimbursable tenant improvements		147,260			-
Security deposits, net of current portion		134,518			269,035
Internal use software, net of accumulated amortization		6,587,067			6,614,443
Prepaid expenses and other assets, net of current portion		3,090			20,419

Total long term assets		8,291,179			8,129,733

TOTAL ASSETS	$	21,654,130		$	25,094,199

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

CURRENT LIABILITIES:
Accounts payable	$	1,172,279		$	1,584,905
Accrued expenses and other		991,379			1,274,452
Unearned revenue, current portion		9,781,821			11,275,368
Deferred rent, current portion		115,290			87,510

Total current liabilities		12,060,769			14,222,235

LONG TERM LIABILITIES:
Unearned revenue		227,904			269,953
Deferred rent		716,416			831,704

Total long term liabilities		944,320			1,101,657

TOTAL LIABILITIES		13,005,089			15,323,892

COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (Note 10)

STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY:
Preferred stock; $.0001 par value: 2,000,000 shares authorized; no shares issued or outstanding		-			-
Common stock; $.0001 par value: 11,000,000 shares authorized; 8,430,605 and 8,283,296 shares issued; and 8,430,579 and 8,283,270 shares outstanding		843			828
Treasury stock, at cost: 26 and 26 shares		(129	)		(129	)
Additional paid in capital		352,297,822			352,615,627
Accumulated other comprehensive loss		(1,165	)		(3,135	)
Accumulated deficit		(343,648,330	)		(342,842,884	)

Total stockholders’ equity		8,649,041			9,770,307

TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY	$	21,654,130		$	25,094,199

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

ONVIA, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND COMPREHENSIVE LOSS

YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2010 AND 2009

	2010			2009

Revenue
Subscription	$	23,269,492		$	22,063,033
Content license		2,480,767			2,460,055
Management information reports		897,209			863,037
Other		344,413			251,060

Total revenue		26,991,881			25,637,185

Cost of revenue (exclusive of depreciation and amortization included below)		3,945,639			4,678,630

Gross margin		23,046,242			20,958,555

Operating expenses:
Sales and marketing		13,993,953			13,910,131
Technology and development		3,769,019			3,095,738
General and administrative		6,177,124			4,551,918

Total operating expenses		23,940,096			21,557,787

Loss from operations		(893,854	)		(599,232	)

Interest and other income, net		88,408			51,761

Net loss	$	(805,446	)	$	(547,471	)

Unrealized gain / (loss) on available-for-sale securities		1,970			(3,135	)

Comprehensive loss	$	(803,476	)	$	(550,606	)

Basic and diluted net loss per common share	$	(0.10	)	$	(0.07	)

Basic and diluted weighted average shares outstanding		8,378,487			8,265,727

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

ONVIA, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2010 AND 2009

	2010			2009
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net loss	$	(805,446	)	$	(547,471	)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization		2,723,625			1,816,699
Loss on abandonment of assets		969,235			-
Stock-based compensation		11,988			448,635
Change in operating assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable		(62,864	)		(42,761	)
Prepaid expenses and other assets		139,727			55,967
Accounts payable		(79,879	)		223,790
Accrued expenses		(251,260	)		(260,319	)
Unearned revenue		(1,535,596	)		2,427,640
Deferred rent		(87,508	)		(60,537	)

Net cash provided by operating activities		1,022,022			4,061,643

CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Additions to property and equipment		(943,993	)		(221,942	)
Additions to internal use software		(3,237,788	)		(2,734,214	)
Purchases of investments		(8,219,863	)		(15,777,061	)
Sales of investments		2,292,000			1,000,000
Maturities of investments		15,200,584			2,141,663
Return of security deposits		134,517			134,517
Reimbursable tenant improvements					-

Net cash provided by / (used in) investing activities		5,225,457			(15,457,037	)

CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Principal payments on capital lease obligations		(6,174	)		(82,472	)
Proceeds from exercise of stock options and purchases under employee stock purchase plan		61,786			81,853
Repurchase of common stock for minimum tax obligations on options exercise		(427,060	)		-

Net cash used in financing activities		(371,448	)		(619	)

Net increase / (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents		5,876,031			(11,396,013	)

Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period		1,646,543			13,042,556

Cash and cash equivalents, end of period	$	7,522,574		$	1,646,543


SUPPLEMENTAL SCHEDULE OF NON-CASH INVESTING AND FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Unrealized gain / (loss) on available-for-sale investments	$	1,970		$	(3,135	)
Issuance of treasury stock for 401K matching contribution		-			(43,740	)
Property and equipment additions in accounts payable		(47,876	)		(9,460	)
Internal use software additions in accounts payable		(127,972	)		(498,954	)
Proceeds from options exercise		806,530			-
Repurchase of stock for net settlement of options exercise		(806,515	)		-

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

ONVIA, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2010 AND 2009

	Common stock						Treasury stock									Accumulated other
	Shares			Amount			Shares			Amount			Additional paid in capital			comprehensive loss			Accumulated deficit			Total

BALANCE, January 1, 2008		8,246,828		$	825			8,081		$	(39,677	)	$	352,127,344		$	-		$	(342,295,413	)	$	9,793,079
Exercise of stock options		10,284			1									25,693									25,694
Purchases under Employee Stock Purchase Plan		18,103			2									56,157									56,159
Treasury stock issued for matching retirement plan contributions		8,055			-			(8,055	)		39,548			4,189									43,737
Stock-based compensation														402,244									402,244
Unrealized loss on available-for-sale investments																	(3,135	)					(3,135	)
Net loss		-			-			-			-			-			-			(547,471	)		(547,471	)
BALANCE, December 31, 2009		8,283,270			828			26			(129	)		352,615,627			(3,135	)		(342,842,884	)		9,770,307

Exercise of stock options		307,007			31									825,252									825,283
Purchases under Employee Stock Purchase Plan		11,632			1									43,018									43,019
Repurchase of common stock for minimum tax obligations on option exercise		(59,314	)		(6	)								(427,054	)								(427,060	)
Non-cash repurchase of stock for net settlement of option exercise		(112,016	)		(11	)								(806,504	)								(806,515	)
Stock-based compensation														47,483									47,483
Unrealized gain on available-for-sale investments																	1,970						1,970
Net loss		-			-			-			-			-			-			(805,446	)		(805,446	)
BALANCE, December 31, 2010		8,430,579		$	843			26		$	(129	)	$	352,297,822		$	(1,165	)	$	(343,648,330	)	$	8,649,041

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

ONVIA, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2010 AND 2009

Note 1:

Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Description of business

Onvia (together with its subsidiary, “Onvia” or the “Company”) is a leading provider of business information and research solutions that help companies plan, market and sell to targeted public sector buyers throughout the United States, or U.S. The government to business, or gBusiness, market place is defined as the market funded by federal, state and local government spending. Onvia’s products, proprietary databases and research tools focus on federal, state, local and educational purchasing entities. The Onvia Online Database helps the Company’s clients proactively track which goods and services government agencies plan to purchase, what they actually purchase, and from whom they purchase. This allows Onvia’s clients to identify new market opportunities, analyze market trends, and obtain useful information about their competitors. Historically, comprehensive market intelligence was only available to large companies with the resources to perform the research and store the data themselves, or companies that could afford to hire outside firms to perform the research for them. Onvia’s processes, which collect and organize transactional information into actionable market intelligence, have enabled the Company to make this same high-value business intelligence affordable to businesses of all sizes. The Company believes that its business solutions provide its clients with a distinct competitive advantage and increased revenue opportunities.

Basis of consolidation

Onvia has a wholly-owned subsidiary in Canada; however, there was no business activity in this subsidiary in the fiscal years ended December 31, 2010 or 2009.

Use of estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, or GAAP, requires the Company’s management to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Significant estimates include the fair value of stock-based compensation, allowance for doubtful accounts, recoverability of long-lived assets, and the valuation allowance for Onvia’s net operating losses. The Company bases its estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that it believes to be reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results may differ significantly from the Company’s estimates. In addition, any significant unanticipated changes in any of the Company’s assumptions could have a material adverse effect on its business, financial condition, and results of operations.

Revenue recognition

Onvia’s revenues are primarily generated from client subscriptions, content licenses and management reports. Onvia’s subscriptions are generally annual contracts; however, the Company also offers, on a limited basis, extended multi-year contracts to its subscription clients, and content licenses are generally multi-year agreements. Subscription fees and content licenses are recognized ratably over the term of the agreement. Onvia also generates revenue from fees charged for management reports, document download services, and list rental services; revenue from these types of services is recognized upon delivery, or, if report refreshes are included, ratably over the service period.

Onvia’s subscription services and management reports are also sold together as a bundled offering. Pursuant to the provisions of Accounting Standard Codification, or ASC, 605-25 Revenue Recognition, the Company allocates revenue from these bundled sales ratably between the subscription services and the management reports based on established list prices for those offerings. In October 2009, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update, or ASU, No. 2009-13, Multiple-Deliverable Revenue Arrangements. This ASU amends the criteria for separating deliverables, and measuring and allocating arrangement consideration to one or more units of accounting. The amendments also establish a selling price hierarchy for determining the selling price of a deliverable. Onvia has adopted the amendments in this ASU for arrangements entered into or materially modified on or after January 1, 2011. The Company does not believe adoption will materially impact its results of operations.

Fair value of financial instruments

Onvia’s financial instruments consist of cash and cash equivalents, short-term investments, accounts receivable, security deposits, accounts payable, and accrued liabilities. The carrying amounts of the current portion of the financial instruments approximate fair value due to their short maturities. The carrying value of the long-term portion of security deposits approximates fair value as the interest rate is at market value. All investments, when held, are classified as available-for-sale and are reported at fair value based on market quotes, and unrealized gains or losses on these investments are recorded in stockholders’ equity and reported in comprehensive income.

Cash, cash equivalents and investments

Onvia considers all highly liquid instruments with remaining maturities at purchase of 90 days or less to be cash equivalents. Investments with original maturities of greater than 90 days, but with remaining maturities of less than one year are classified as short-term, and investments with remaining maturities of 365 days or greater are classified as long-term. All investments are classified as available-for-sale with any gain/loss recorded in comprehensive income.

Management of credit risk

Onvia is subject to concentration of credit risk, primarily from its investments. Onvia manages its credit risk for investments by purchasing investment-grade securities and diversifying its investment portfolio among issuers and maturities. To mitigate its credit risk associated with its investment portfolio in light of the downturn in the financial services industry, the Company reallocated all of its investments into FDIC insured or U.S government backed funds as of December 31, 2009.

Property and equipment

Equipment and leasehold improvements are stated at cost, net of accumulated depreciation. Depreciation expense on software, furniture, and equipment is recorded using the straight-line method over estimated useful lives of three to five years. Leasehold improvements are depreciated over the shorter of their useful lives or the remaining term of the underlying lease.

The Company periodically evaluates its long-lived assets for impairment in accordance with ASC 360, Property, Plant, and Equipment – Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets. ASC 360-40 requires that an impairment loss be recognized for assets to be disposed of or held-for-use when the carrying amount of an asset is deemed to not be recoverable. If events or circumstances indicate that any of the Company’s long-lived assets might be impaired, the Company analyzes the estimated undiscounted future cash flows to be generated from the applicable asset. In addition, the Company records an impairment loss to the extent that the carrying value of the asset exceeds the fair value of the asset. Fair value is generally determined using an estimate of discounted future net cash flows from operating activities or upon disposal of the asset. No assets were impaired during the years ended December 31, 2010 or 2009.

Internal use software

ASC 350-40, Intangibles – Goodwill and Other subtopic Internal-Use Software, requires all costs related to the development of internal use software, other than those incurred during the application development stage, to be expensed as incurred. Costs incurred during the application development stage are required to be capitalized and amortized over the estimated useful life of the software. Capitalized software costs are amortized on a straight-line basis over their expected economic lives, typically 3 to 5 years. The amount of costs capitalized within any period is dependent on the nature of software development activities and projects in each period.

Pursuant to ASC 360, Property, Plant, and Equipment, Onvia periodically evaluates the remaining useful lives of internal use software and will record an abandonment if management determines that all or a portion of the asset will no longer be used, or will adjust the remaining useful life to reflect revised estimates for impairment in accordance with ASC 360 as described above under “Property and equipment.” In addition, if the carrying value of the software exceeds the estimated future cash flows, an impairment will be recorded to reduce the carrying value to the expected realizable value.

Income taxes

Onvia accounts for income taxes using the asset and liability method. Under this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the estimated future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax basis, and for net operating loss, or NOL, carryforwards. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. A valuation allowance has been established for the full amount of the net deferred tax assets as the Company has determined that the recognition criteria for realization have not been met.

Utilization of the NOL carryforwards may be subject to a substantial annual limitation due to ownership change limitations that may have occurred previously or that could occur in the future provided by Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”). These ownership changes may limit the amount of NOL carryforwards that can be utilized annually to offset future taxable income and tax, respectively. In general, an ownership change, as defined by Section 382 of the Code, results from transactions increasing the ownership of certain stockholders or public groups in the stock of a corporation by more than 50 percentage points over a three-year period.

Onvia is in the process of performing a Section 382 analysis regarding ownership changes that may have occurred, but at this time it cannot reasonably estimate whether such a change has occurred. Any carryforwards that will expire prior to utilization as a result of such limitations will be removed from deferred tax assets with a corresponding reduction of the valuation allowance.

The Company currently has a full valuation allowance for its deferred tax assets as the future realization of the tax benefit is not more likely than not. Based on information currently available, and until the Section 382 analysis is completed, Onvia cannot reasonably estimate whether the unrecognized tax benefit will change significantly within the next twelve months.

Treasury stock

Onvia accounts for treasury stock using the cost method. As of December 31, 2010, the Company held 26 shares of treasury stock with a cost basis of $129. The Company holds the treasury shares to fund matching contributions to its 401K retirement plan for employee contributions. As discussed in Note 11, no treasury shares were used to fund matching contributions for 2010 employee contributions. In March 2009, the Company issued 8,055 treasury shares to fund matching contributions for 2008 employee contributions.

Other comprehensive income or loss

Comprehensive income or loss is the change in equity from transactions and other events and circumstances other than those resulting from investments by and distributions to owners. Other comprehensive loss for Onvia consists of unrealized gains and losses on available-for-sale investments.

Net loss per share

Basic loss per share is calculated by dividing net loss for the period by the weighted average shares of common stock outstanding for the period. Diluted earnings per share is calculated by dividing net loss per share by the weighted average common stock outstanding for the period plus dilutive potential common shares using the treasury stock method. In periods with a net loss, basic and diluted earnings per share are identical because inclusion of potentially dilutive common shares would be antidilutive.

For the year ended December 31, 2010 options to purchase 1,695,349 shares of common stock are excluded from the calculation because they would have been anti-dilutive since Onvia was in a net loss position. For the year ended December 31, 2009, options and warrants to purchase 1,887,357 shares of common stock are excluded from the calculation because they would have been anti-dilutive since Onvia was in a net loss position.

New accounting pronouncements

In January 2010, the FASB issued ASU No. 2010-06, Improving Disclosures About Fair Value Measurements, which requires reporting entities to make new disclosures about recurring or nonrecurring fair-value measurements including significant transfers into and out of Level 1 and Level 2 fair-value measurements and information on purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements on a gross basis in the reconciliation of Level 3 fair-value measurements. ASU 2010-06 is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2009, except for Level 3 reconciliation disclosures which are effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2010. Onvia adopted the provisions related to Level 1 and Level 2 fair-value measurements in the fourth quarter of 2009 and it adopted the provisions related to Level 3 reconciliation disclosures in the fourth quarter of 2010. Adoption of ASU 2010-06 did not have a material impact on its results of operations or financial position

In October 2009, the FASB issued ASU No. 2009-13, Multiple-Deliverable Revenue Arrangements. This ASU establishes the accounting and reporting guidance for arrangements including multiple revenue-generating activities. This ASU provides amendments to the criteria for separating deliverables, and measuring and allocating arrangement consideration to one or more units of accounting. The amendments in this ASU also establish a selling price hierarchy for determining the selling price of a deliverable. Significantly enhanced disclosures are also required to provide information about a vendor’s multiple-deliverable revenue arrangements, including information about the nature and terms, significant deliverables, and its performance within arrangements. The amendments also require providing information about the significant judgments made, and changes to those judgments, and about how the application of the relative selling-price method affects the timing or amount of revenue recognition. The amendments in this ASU are effective prospectively for revenue arrangements entered into or materially modified in fiscal years beginning on or after June 15, 2010. Onvia adopted this ASU effective January 1, 2011. The Company does not expect adoption to have a material impact on its results of operations.

Note 2:

Stock-Based Compensation and Stock Option Activity

Pursuant to the provisions of ASC 718, Compensation – Stock Compensation, or ASC 718, Onvia measures compensation cost for all stock-based awards at fair value on the date of grant. The fair value of stock options is determined using the Black-Scholes valuation model. Such value is recognized as expense over the service period, net of estimated forfeitures. The estimation of stock awards that will ultimately vest requires judgment, and to the extent actual results or updated estimates differ from the Company’s current estimates, such amounts will be recorded as a cumulative adjustment in the period estimates are revised. Management considers many factors when estimating expected forfeitures, including employee class, historical experience and expected future activity. Actual results, and future changes in estimates, may differ substantially from management’s current estimates.

Stock-Based Benefit Plans

Onvia, Inc. 2008 Equity Incentive Plan

The Onvia, Inc. 2008 Equity Incentive Plan, or the 2008 Plan, was adopted in September 2008 and it amended and restated the previous 1999 Stock Option Plan, or the 1999 Plan. Shares that were outstanding from the 1999 Plan will continue to be outstanding under that plan until forfeited, at which time they would be added back to the 2008 Plan. The 2008 Plan provides for the issuance of incentive and nonqualified common stock options, stock awards, restricted stock, restricted stock units and stock appreciation rights. Awards under this plan can be granted for ten years after the adoption date. The 2008 Plan requires that the exercise price for all options to be at least 100% of the fair market value of the underlying shares on the date of grant. The 2008 Plan contains specific provisions that govern awards in the event of a change in control and provides for compliance with the requirements of Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code to the extent that awards are treated as deferred compensation. All employees, officers, directors and consultants of Onvia are eligible to participate in the 2008 Plan, although it is not anticipated that every eligible employee or consultant will receive awards. Options under this plan vest in increments over time, but typically have either a four or five year vesting schedule, normally with 25% or 20%, respectively, vesting one year from the grant date and ratable monthly vesting thereafter. The total number of options outstanding and the number of shares available for issuance under the 2008 Plan as of December 31, 2010 were 357,763 and 272,735, respectively.

2000 Directors’ Stock Option Plan

In March 2000, Onvia adopted a Directors’ Stock Option Plan or the Directors’ Plan. This plan expired on February 28, 2010. Options granted under this plan will remain active and will continue to vest according to the original grant provisions. Grants were made under this plan to each eligible board member on the date such person was first elected or appointed as a board member. At each annual stockholders’ meeting, each non-employee director was granted an additional option to purchase 1,000 shares of common stock under the Directors’ Plan, provided such person had been a board member of Onvia for at least the prior six months. The initial option grants under the Directors’ Plan vested 25% each year for four years on the anniversary of the date of grant, had a term of ten years, and an exercise price equal to the closing price of Onvia’s stock on the grant date. The annual grants vest in full one year from the date of grant, have a ten year life, and an exercise price equal to the closing price on the date of grant. As of December 31, 2008, all shares available for issuance under the Directors’ Plan had been granted. Accordingly, on October 23, 2008, the Board of Directors approved the stock option grants with the same terms described above (historically made under our Directors’ Plan) under the Company’s 2008 Equity Incentive Plan.

Employee Stock Purchase Plan

In May 2000, Onvia adopted the 2000 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, or ESPP, and initially authorized 60,000 shares of common stock for issuance under the ESPP. Each year, the number of shares authorized for issuance under the ESPP is increased by the lesser of: 1% of the total number of shares of common stock then outstanding; 60,000 shares; or a lesser number of shares as determined by the Board of Directors. Under the ESPP, an eligible employee may purchase shares of Onvia common stock, based on certain limitations, at a price equal to the lesser of 85% of the fair market value of the common stock at the beginning or end of the respective offering period. This plan is compensatory under the provisions of ASC 718 and the fair value of purchases under the ESPP is recognized as compensation expense over the term of the awards. The ESPP purchases shares on a semi-annual basis. The total number of shares authorized for future issuance under the ESPP as of December 31, 2010 was 509,650 shares.

Impact on Results of Operations

The impact on Onvia’s results of operations of recording stock-based compensation for the years ended December 31 was as follows:

	2010			2009
Cost of sales	$	2,335		$	16,772
Sales and marketing		(66,413	)		173,290
Technology and development		32,117			80,805
General and administrative		43,949			177,769

Total stock-based compensation	$	11,988		$	448,636

The reduction in stock-based compensation in 2010 compared to 2009 is primarily due to the forfeiture of options upon the departure of three former executives. The departure of our former Vice President of Sales, our former Senior Vice President of Products, Technology and Information, and our former Chief Strategy Officer resulted in the reversal of approximately $276,000 in stock-based compensation in 2010.

Valuation Assumptions

Onvia calculated the fair value of each option award on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes valuation model. The following weighted average assumptions were used for options granted in the years ending December 31:

	2010			2009
Risk-free interest rate		1.71	%		2.25	%
Expected volatility		49	%		48	%
Expected dividends		0	%		0	%
Expected life (in years)		5.7			4.9

The fair value of each employee purchase under the ESPP is estimated on the first day of each purchase period using the Black-Scholes valuation model. Purchase periods begin on May 1 and November 1 of each year. The following weighted average assumptions were used for purchase periods beginning during the years ended December 31 under the ESPP:

	2010			2009
Risk-free interest rate		0.20	%		0.24	%
Expected volatility		55	%		85	%
Expected dividends		0	%		0	%
Expected life (in years)		0.5			0.5

Risk-Free Interest Rate

The average risk free interest rate was determined based on the market yield for U.S. Treasury securities for the expected term of the grant at the time of grant.

Expected Volatility

ASC 718 requires companies to estimate expected volatility over the expected term of the options granted.

Management used the historical volatility of Onvia’s common stock to estimate the future volatility of its common stock for purposes of estimating the fair value of options granted during 2010 and 2009.

Expected Dividends

Management does not currently intend to pay dividends; therefore, this assumption is set at 0%.

Expected Life

Onvia’s computation of expected life was determined based on historical experience of similar awards, giving consideration to the contractual terms of the awards, vesting schedules and expectations of future employee behavior. Onvia’s historical experience is limited, because the Company does not have complete life-cycle information on any of its options; therefore, management was required to estimate future exercise and cancellation behavior, generally by assuming that remaining shares would be exercised or cancelled ratably over their remaining contractual term, adjusted for certain expectations of future employee behavior. Management examined the behavior patterns separately for distinct groups of employees that have similar historical experience.

Stock Option Activity

The following table summarizes activity under Onvia’s equity incentive plans for the year ended December 31, 2010:

	Options Outstanding			Weighted Average Exercise Price		Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Term (in years)		Aggregate Intrinsic Value (1)

Total options outstanding at January 1, 2010		1,887,357		$	8.48
Options granted		322,655			4.08
Options exercised		(307,007	)		2.69
Options forfeited and cancelled		(207,656	)		21.33
Total options outstanding at December 31, 2010		1,695,349		$	7.12

Options exercisable at December 31, 2010		1,333,136		$	7.88		2.27	$	379,350
Options vested and expected to vest at December 31, 2010		1,647,646		$	7.21		3.59	$	743,687

(1) Aggregate intrinsic value is calculated as the difference between the exercise price of the underlying awards and the quoted price of Onvia’s common stock of $4.63 at December 31, 2010 for options that were in-the-money at December 31, 2010. The number of in-the-money options outstanding and exercisable at December 31, 2010 was 489,721 and 218,124, respectively.

The weighted average grant date fair value of options granted during the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009 was $1.80 and $2.16 per share, respectively. The total intrinsic value of options exercised during the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009 was $1.4 million and $28,000, respectively.

As of December 31, 2010, there was approximately $395,000 of unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested stock options and estimated purchases under the ESPP. That cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 1.98 years.

During the year ended December 31, 2010, approximately $62,000 was received for exercises of stock options and purchases under Onvia’s ESPP. In addition, in May 2010, Michael Pickett, Onvia’s former CEO, performed a cashless exercise of 302,979 options by surrendering 112,016 options.

Note 3:

Short-Term Investments

In accordance with ASC 320, Investments – Debt and Equity Securities, Onvia classifies short-term investments in debt securities as available-for-sale at December 31, 2010, stated at fair value as summarized in the following table:

	December 31, 2010
	Amortized Cost		Gross Unrealized Gains		Gross Unrealized Losses			Fair Value
U.S. Government backed securities	$	1,086,679	$	114	$	(477	)	$	1,086,316
Certificate of Deposit (1)		1,494,000		-		-			1,494,000
Corporate Bonds		781,994		-		(799	)		781,195
	$	3,362,673	$	114	$	(1,276	)	$	3,361,511

(1) We evaluated certificates of deposits held as of December 31, 2010 and concluded that they meet the definition of securities as defined in ASC 320.

Onvia accounts for short-term investments in accordance with ASC 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures, which defines fair value as the exchange price that would be received for an asset, or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price), in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. ASC 820 also establishes a fair value hierarchy, which requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. The standard describes three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value:

Level 1 – Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities;

Level 2 – Observable inputs other than Level 1 prices such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities; quoted prices in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities; and

Level 3 – Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities.

Onvia uses the market approach to measure fair value for its financial assets and liabilities. The market approach uses prices and other relevant information generated by market transactions involving identical or comparable assets or liabilities. The following table summarizes, by major security type, short-term investments classified as available-for-sale at December 31, 2010, stated at fair value:

	Fair Value Measurements as of December 31, 2010
	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Balance as of December 31, 2010
Description
U.S. Government backed securities	$	-	$	1,086,316	$	-	$	1,086,316
Certificate of Deposit		-		1,494,000		-		1,494,000
Corporate Bonds		-		781,195		-		781,195
	$	-	$	3,361,511	$	-	$	3,361,511

There were no transfers in or out of Level 1 or Level 2 investments during the fourth quarter of 2010, and there was no activity in Level 3 fair value measurements during that period.

Note 4:

Prepaid Expenses and Other Current Assets

Prepaid expenses and other current assets consist of the following at December 31:

	December 31,		December 31,
	2010		2009
Prepaid expenses	$	537,652	$	673,119
Interest and other receivable		56,169		43,100
	$	593,821	$	716,219

Note 5:

Security Deposits

Pursuant to Onvia’s current lease for corporate office space, Onvia provided a security deposit of $538,000, which is reduced annually on a straight line basis over the first three years of the lease beginning with the first anniversary of the commencement date. On the fourth anniversary of the commencement date, $45,000 will be returned to Onvia, and the balance of $90,000 will be returned in October 2015 upon termination of the existing lease agreement. In March 2009 and 2010, $135,000 was returned to the Company, representing the second and third of the annual reductions.

Note 6:

Property and Equipment

Property and equipment consists of the following at December 31:

	2010			2009
Computer equipment	$	3,657,442		$	2,786,604
Software		1,107,325			1,089,334
Furniture and fixtures		107,113			98,528
Leasehold improvements		735,342			709,921

Total cost basis		5,607,222			4,684,387

Less accumulated depreciation and amortization		(4,187,978	)		(3,458,551	)

Net book value	$	1,419,244		$	1,225,836

Depreciation expense was $789,000 and $716,000 for the twelve months ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively.

Note 7:

Internal Use Software

Onvia capitalizes qualifying computer software costs incurred during the “application development stage” and other costs as permitted by ASC 350-40, Intangibles – Goodwill and Other Subtopic Internal-Use Software. Amortization of these costs begins once the product is ready for its intended use. These costs are amortized on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful life of the product, typically 3 to 5 years. The amount of costs capitalized within any period is dependent on the nature of software development activities and projects in each period.

Onvia periodically evaluates the remaining useful lives and carrying values of internal use software. If management determines that all or a portion of the asset will no longer be used, or the estimated remaining useful life differs from existing estimates, an abandonment will be recorded to reduce the carrying value or adjust the remaining useful life to reflect revised estimates. In addition, if the carrying value of the software exceeds the estimated future cash flows, an impairment will be recorded to reduce the carrying value to the expected realizable value.

The following table presents a rollforward of capitalized internal use software for the twelve months ended December 31, 2010:

	Balance at December 31, 2009			Additions			Abandonments			Balance at December 31, 2010
Capitalized Internal Use Software	$	9,112,307		$	2,876,663		$	(1,788,209	)	$	10,200,761
Accumulated amortization		(2,497,864	)		(1,934,804	)		818,974			(3,613,694	)
	$	6,614,443		$	941,859		$	(969,235	)	$	6,587,067

Amortization expense related to capitalized software was $1.9 million and $1.1 million for the twelve months ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively.

During the second quarter of 2010, Onvia abandoned three internal use software projects. The abandoned assets relate to code developed for its commercial sector information, search engine marketing, and an internal cross-system integration project. In the second quarter, the Company made the decision to no longer append contact and project specific information to its commercial sector content. This decision was made as a result of a change to focus exclusively on the government business, or gBusiness, sector and to no longer position private sector data as a differentiator within the Company’s gBusiness solution. Without this actionable contact and project specific information, Onvia does not believe there is future value associated with this content. This project represents 93% of the total abandoned costs. Pursuant with the guidance in ASC 360-35-47, Onvia recorded a loss on abandonment of approximately $967,000, representing the balance as of June 30, 2010 for these three assets. This loss is included in operating expenses under the general and administrative category in the twelve months ended December 31, 2010.

Note 8:

Accrued Expenses

Accrued expenses and other consist of the following at December 31:

	December 31,		December 31,
	2010		2009
Payroll and related liabilities	$	848,751	$	1,102,174
State excise, other taxes payable and other		142,628		166,104
Obligations under capital leases		-		6,174
	$	991,379	$	1,274,452

Note 9:

Income Taxes

At December 31, 2010 and 2009, Onvia had tax net operating loss carryforwards of $255.2 million and $252.3 million, respectively, which may be used to offset future taxable income. The remaining carryforwards expire at various dates beginning in 2018 through 2030. The utilization of the net operating loss may be subject to annual limitations due to ownership changes of stock in prior years.

The provision for income taxes is different from that which would be obtained by applying the statutory federal income tax rate as follows:

	Year ended			Year ended
	December 31,			December 31,
	2010			2009
Tax (benefit) / expense at statutory rate		(34.0	%)		(34.0	%)
Stock-based compensation		(21.4	%)		9.4	%
Amortization of goodwill		(2.1	%)		(3.1	%)
Meals and entertainment		5.1	%		3.9	%
Increase / (decrease) in Valuation Allowance		52.4%			23.8%
		0.0%			0.0%

Onvia’s net deferred tax assets, calculated by applying the U.S. federal statutory income tax rate of 34% to total deferrals, consist of the following at December 31:

	December 31,			December 31,
	2010			2009
Net operating loss carryforward	$	86,779,357		$	85,778,013
Prepaid expenses and other assets currently deductible		(183,853	)		(230,270	)
Accrued expenses not currently deductible		1,099,343			1,299,088
Depreciation different for tax purposes		(1,276,815	)		(850,967	)

Net deferred tax asset		86,418,032			85,995,864
Less: Valuation allowance		(86,418,032	)		(85,995,864	)

Net deferred tax asset	$	-		$	-

Onvia has recorded a full valuation allowance equal to the net deferred tax asset balance based upon management’s determination that the realization is not more likely than not.

Note 10:

Commitments and Contingencies

Operating leases

Total rent expense associated with our real estate operating lease was $842,923 and $846,976 for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. Onvia also has a non-cancellable operating lease for office equipment, which expires in July 2014.

Future minimum lease payments required on noncancellable operating leases are as follows for the years ending December 31:

	Real Estate		Office Equipment		Total
	Operating Leases		Operating Lease		Operating Leases
2011	$	953,815	$	18,251	$	972,066
2012		982,430		18,251		1,000,681
2013		1,011,903		18,251		1,030,154
2014		1,042,260		10,647		1,052,907
Thereafter		894,171		-		894,171

	$	4,884,579	$	65,400	$	4,949,979

Capital Leases

In June 2007, Onvia entered into non-cancellable capital leases for server equipment and maintenance related to this equipment. These leases expired in March 2010 and Onvia has no further obligations on these leases.

Purchase Obligations

Onvia has noncancellable purchase obligations for software development and license agreements, co-location hosting arrangements, telecom agreements, marketing agreements and third-party content agreements. The agreements expire in dates ranging from 2010 to 2014. Future required payments under these non-cancellable agreements are as follows for the years ending December 31:

	Obligations
2011	$	1,040,816
2012		620,940
2013		524,472
Thereafter		159,800
	$	2,346,028

Legal Proceedings

Class Action Securities Litigation

In 2001, five securities class action suits were filed against Onvia, certain former executive officers, and the lead underwriter of Onvia’s Initial Public Offering, or IPO, Credit Suisse First Boston, or CSFB. The suits were filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York on behalf of all persons who acquired securities of Onvia between March 1, 2000 and December 6, 2000. In 2002, a consolidated complaint was filed. The complaint charged defendants with violations of Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder) and Sections 11 and 15 of the Securities Act of 1933, for issuing a Registration Statement and Prospectus that failed to disclose and contained false and misleading statements regarding certain commissions purported to have been received by the underwriters, and other purported underwriter practices in connection with their allocation of shares in the offering. The complaint sought an undisclosed amount of damages, as well as attorneys’ fees. This action is being coordinated with approximately 300 other nearly identical actions filed against other companies. At the Court’s request, plaintiffs selected six “focus” cases, which do not include Onvia. The Court indicated that its decisions in the six focus cases are intended to provide strong guidance for the parties in the remaining cases.

The parties in the coordinated cases, including Onvia’s case, reached a settlement. The insurers for the issuer defendants in the coordinated cases will make the settlement payment on behalf of the issuers, including Onvia. On October 5, 2009, the Court granted final approval of the settlement. Objectors to the settlement are pursuing two appeals of the settlement approval to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. Plaintiffs have moved to dismiss both appeals.

Due to the inherent uncertainties of litigation, the Company cannot accurately predict the ultimate outcome of this matter. If the settlement does not survive appeal and Onvia is found liable, the Company is unable to estimate or predict the potential damages that might be awarded, whether such damages would be greater than Onvia’s insurance coverage, and whether such damages would have a material impact on its results of operations or financial condition in any future period.

On October 2, 2007, Vanessa Simmonds, a purported stockholder of Onvia, filed suit in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington against Credit Suisse Group, JPMorgan Chase & Co. and Bank of America Corporation, the lead underwriters of Onvia’s IPO in March 2000, alleging violations of Section 16(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The complaint alleges that the combined number of shares of Onvia's common stock beneficially owned by the lead underwriters and certain unnamed officers, directors, and principal stockholders exceeded ten percent of its outstanding common stock from the date of Onvia’s IPO on March 2, 2000, through at least February 28, 2001. It further alleges that those entities and individuals were thus subject to the reporting requirements of Section 16(a) and the short-swing trading prohibition of Section 16(b), and failed to comply with those provisions. The complaint seeks to recover from the lead underwriters any "short-swing profits" obtained by them in violation of Section 16(b). Onvia was named as a nominal defendant in the action, but has no liability for the asserted claims. No directors or officers of Onvia are named as defendants in this action. On October 29, 2007, the case was reassigned to Judge James L. Robart along with fifty-four other Section 16(b) cases seeking recovery of short-swing profits from underwriters in connection with various initial public offerings. On February 25, 2008, Ms. Simmonds filed an Amended Complaint asserting substantially similar claims as those set forth in the initial complaint. Onvia waived service. On July 25, 2008, Onvia joined with 29 other issuers to file the Issuer Defendants' Joint Motion to Dismiss. Underwriter Defendants also filed a Joint Motion to Dismiss on July 25, 2008. Plaintiff filed oppositions to both motions on September 8, 2008. All replies in support of the motions to dismiss were filed on October 23, 2008. Oral argument on the motions to dismiss was held on January 16, 2009. On March 12, 2009, the Court granted the Issuer Defendants' Joint Motion to Dismiss, dismissing the complaint without prejudice on the grounds that Ms. Simmonds had failed to make an adequate demand on Onvia prior to filing her complaint. In its order, the Court stated it would not permit Plaintiff to amend her demand letters while pursuing her claims in the litigation. Because the Court dismissed the case on the ground that it lacked subject matter jurisdiction, it did not specifically reach the issue of whether Plaintiff's claims were barred by the applicable statute of limitations. However, the Court also granted the Underwriters' Joint Motion to Dismiss with respect to cases involving non-moving issuers, holding that the cases were barred by the applicable statute of limitations because the issuers' shareholders had notice of the potential claims more than five years prior to filing suit.

Ms. Simmonds filed a Notice of Appeal on March 31, 2009, and an Amended Notice of Appeal on April 10, 2009. The underwriters subsequently filed a Notice of Cross-Appeal, arguing that the dismissal of the claims involving the moving issuers should have been with prejudice because the claims were untimely under the applicable statute of limitations. Ms. Simmonds' opening brief in the appeal was filed on August 26, 2009; Onvia and the underwriters’ responses and the underwriters' brief in support of their cross-appeal were filed on October 2, 2009; Ms. Simmonds' reply brief and opposition to the cross-appeal was filed on November 2, 2009; and the underwriters' reply brief in support of their cross-appeals was filed on November 17, 2009. On October 5, 2010, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit heard oral argument regarding this matter.

On December 2, 2010, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the District Court’s decision to dismiss the moving issuers’ cases (including Onvia’s) on the grounds that plaintiff’s demand letters were insufficient to put the issuers on notice of the claims asserted against them and further ordered that the dismissals be made with prejudice. The Ninth Circuit reversed and remanded the District Court’s decision on the underwriter’ motion to dismiss as to the claims arising from the non-moving issuers’ IPOs, finding plaintiff’s claims were not time-barred under the applicable statute of limitations.

On December 16, 2010, underwriters filed a petition for panel rehearing and petition for rehearing en banc and Appellant Vanessa Simmonds also filed a petition for rehearing en banc. On January 18, 2011, the Ninth Circuit denied the petition for rehearing and petitions for rehearing en banc.

On January 24, 2011, the underwriters filed a motion to stay the issuance of the Ninth Circuit’s mandate in the cases involving the non-moving issuers. On January 25, 2011, the Ninth Circuit granted the underwriters’ motion and ordered that the mandate in the cases involving the non-moving issuers is stayed for ninety days pending the filing of a petition for writ of certiorari in the United States Supreme Court. On January 26, 2011, Appellant Vanessa Simmonds moved to join the underwriters’ motion and requested the Ninth Circuit stay the mandate in all cases. On January 26, 2011, the Ninth Circuit granted Appellant’s motion and ruled that the mandate in all cases (including Onvia’s and other moving issuers) is stayed for ninety days pending Appellant’s filing of a petition for writ of certiorari in the United States Supreme Court.

Onvia currently believes that the outcome of this litigation will not have a material adverse impact on its consolidated financial position and results of operations.

Potential Future Litigation

In addition, from time to time the Company is subject to various other legal proceedings that arise in the ordinary course of business. While management believes that the disposition of these matters will not have a material adverse effect on the financial position, results of operations, or cash flows of the Company, the ultimate outcomes are inherently uncertain.

Note 11:

Employee Retirement Plan

In March 2000, Onvia adopted a Savings and Retirement Plan (the “Retirement Plan”), which is a defined contribution plan. The Retirement Plan is a qualified salary reduction plan in which all eligible employees may elect to have a percentage of their pre-tax compensation contributed to the Retirement Plan, subject to certain guidelines issued by the Internal Revenue Service.

In January 2006, the Retirement Plan was amended to add a discretionary matching contribution, made in Onvia common stock, up to 25% of every dollar up to 6% of all eligible employee contributions. The matching contributions are subject to a four year vesting schedule, with vesting measured from the employee’s date of hire. The Company’s Board of Directors have the sole discretion to make matching contributions in the first quarter following each Plan year, and employees must be employed on the last day of the Plan year to be eligible to receive the matching contribution. As of December 31, 2010, only 26 shares were available in treasury. The timing of Onvia’s fourth quarter earnings release coincided with a voluntary black-out period for insider trading of Onvia stock. As a result, the Company did not purchase additional shares to fund the match for 2009 employee contributions. Since the 26 treasury shares held were insufficient to fund the match, the Company transferred approximately $64,000 in cash in lieu of shares to fund the matching contribution. In March 2009, Onvia transferred 8,055 shares from treasury stock into the Retirement Plan to match 2008 employee contributions. The Company recorded $82,000 in non-cash stock-based compensation in 2009 related to this match. Onvia’s Board of Directors elected not to make a matching contribution for 2010 employee contributions.

Note 12:

Stockholders’ Equity

Authorized shares

At December 31, 2010, the number of authorized shares is 13,000,000 with a par value of $0.0001 per share. Authorized shares are comprised of 11,000,000 shares of common stock and 2,000,000 shares of undesignated preferred stock.

Note 13:

Supplemental Cash Flow Information

Onvia paid approximately $9,000 in interest expense on capital leases during the year ended December 31, 2009. Interest expense paid on capital leases during the year ended December 31, 2010 was less than $1,000.

Note 14:

Subsequent Events

None.

Selected Quarterly Financial Information (Unaudited)

The following tables summarize the quarterly financial data for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009:

	Three Months Ended
	March 31,			June 30,			September 30,			December 31,
	2010			2010			2010			2010
	(in thousands, except per share amounts)
Historical Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income / (Loss) Data:
Revenue	$	6,987		$	6,841		$	6,705		$	6,459
Gross margin		5,923			5,751			5,733			5,639
Noncash stock-based compensation		(29	)		63			78			(100	)
Total operating expenses		5,922			6,888			5,634			5,496
Income / (loss) from operations		1			(1,137	)		99			143
Net income / (loss)	$	17		$	(1,082	)	$	109		$	150
Unrealized gain / (loss) on available-for-sale investments		5			2			(3	)		(2	)
Comprehensive income / (loss)		22			(1,080	)		106			148
Basic net (loss) / income per common share	$	0.00		$	(0.13	)	$	0.01		$	0.02
Diluted net (loss) / income per common share	$	0.00		$	(0.13	)	$	0.01		$	0.02

Basic weighted average shares outstanding		8,284			8,375			8,425			8,429
Diluted weighted average shares outstanding		8,691			8,375			8,465			8,391

	Three Months Ended
	March 31,			June 30,			September 30,			December 31,
		2009			2009			2009			2009
	(in thousands, except per share amounts)
Historical Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive (Loss) / Income Data:
Revenue	$	5,887		$	6,216		$	6,612		$	6,922
Gross margin		4,662			4,988			5,452			5,856
Noncash stock-based compensation		115			102			67			165
Total operating expenses		5,295			5,193			5,300			5,769
(Loss) / income from operations		(633	)		(205	)		152			87
Net (loss) / income	$	(631	)	$	(197	)	$	167		$	114
Unrealized (loss) / gain on available-for-sale investments		-			(1	)		2			(4	)
Comprehensive (loss) / income		(631	)		(198	)		169			110
Basic net (loss) / income per common share	$	(0.08	)	$	(0.02	)	$	0.02		$	0.01
Diluted net (loss) / income per common share	$	(0.08	)	$	(0.02	)	$	0.02		$	0.01

Basic weighted average shares outstanding		8,248			8,262			8,271			8,280
Diluted weighted average shares outstanding		8,248			8,262			8,570			8,580

ITEM 9.

CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

None.

ITEM 9A.

CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Disclosure Controls and Procedures

The Company maintains disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that material information required to be disclosed in the Company’s periodic reports filed or submitted under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the Exchange Act, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities Exchange Commission’s, or SEC, rules and forms. Onvia’s disclosure controls and procedures are also designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the reports the Company files or submits under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to the Company’s management, including its principal executive officer and principal financial officer as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

Based on management’s evaluation as of the end of the period covered by this Report, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer have concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures, as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) promulgated under the Exchange Act, were effective as of the end of the period covered by this Report.

Report of Management on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

Onvia’s management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting for the Company, as such term is defined in Rule 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) promulgated under the Exchange Act. Internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. Internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the Company’s assets; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of the financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures are being made only with proper authorizations; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of the Company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

The Company’s management, under the supervision of and with the participation of the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer, assessed the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2010 based on the framework and criteria established in Internal Control – Integrated Framework, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission, or COSO. This evaluation included review of the documentation of controls, evaluation of the design effectiveness of controls, testing of the operating effectiveness of controls and a conclusion on this evaluation. Based on this evaluation, management concluded that the Company’s internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2010.

This Report does not include an attestation report of the Company’s registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting. Management’s report was not subject to attestation by the Company’s registered public accounting firm pursuant to the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, which exempts issuers that are neither accelerated filers nor large accelerated filers, as defined in Rule 12b-2 under the Exchange Act, from Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. This exemption permits us to provide only management’s report in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

There were no changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting during the quarter ended December 31, 2010 that materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

ITEM 9B.

OTHER INFORMATION

None.

PART III

Certain information required by Part III is omitted from this Annual Report on Form 10-K because Onvia intends to file a definitive Proxy Statement for its Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the “Proxy Statement”) not later than 120 days after the end of the fiscal year covered by this Form 10-K, and certain information to be included therein is incorporated herein by reference.

ITEM 10.

DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

The information required by this item regarding the Company’s directors is incorporated herein by reference to the section entitled “Proposal No. 1: Election of Directors” in the Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on May 10, 2011 (“Proxy Statement”). Information relating to compliance with Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act is incorporated herein by reference to the section entitled “Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance” in the Proxy Statement. Information regarding the Company’s audit committee and audit committee financial expert is incorporated herein by reference to the section entitled “Corporate Governance” in the Proxy Statement. Information regarding the Company’s executive officers is set forth under the caption “Executive Officers of the Registrant” in Part 1 of this Annual Report and is incorporated by reference into this Item 10.

The Company adopted a code of ethics applicable to its Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Controller and other finance leaders, which is a “code of ethics” as defined by applicable rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission. This code is publicly available on the Company’s website at www.onvia.com. If the Company makes any amendments to this code other than technical, administrative or other non-substantive amendments, or grants any waivers, including implicit waivers, from a provision of this code to the Company’s Chief Executive Officer, Chief Accounting Officer or Controller, the Company will disclose the nature of the amendment or waiver, its effective date and to whom it applies on its website or in a report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

ITEM 11.

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

The information required by this item is incorporated by reference to the sections entitled “Executive Compensation,” “Director Compensation,” and “Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation” in the Proxy Statement.

ITEM 12.

SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

The information required by Item 201(d) of Regulation S-K under this item is contained in Item 5 of this Report, which is incorporated by reference herein, under the caption “Securities Authorized for Issuance under Equity Compensation Plans.”

The information required by Item 403 of Regulation S-K under this item is incorporated by reference to the section entitled “Common Stock Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management” in the Proxy Statement.

ITEM 13.

CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE

The information required by this item is incorporated by reference to the sections entitled “Certain Relationships and Related Person Transactions” and “Board of Director and Committee Information” in the Proxy Statement.

ITEM 14.

PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES

The information required by this item is incorporated by reference to the sections entitled “Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm’s Fees and Services” in the Proxy Statement.

PART IV

ITEM 15.

EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES

Index to Consolidated Financial Statements and Financial Statement Schedule:

1.	INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

	Page
Report of Deloitte & Touche LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm		25
Consolidated Financial Statements:
Balance Sheets		26
Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss		27
Statements of Cash Flows		28
Statements of Stockholders’ Equity		29
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements		30

FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES

SCHEDULE II – VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS

Description	Balances at Beginning of Period		Charged to Costs and Expenses		Deductions(1)			Balances at End of Period

Allowance for doubtful accounts
Year Ended December 31, 2009	$	31,960	$	434,739	$	(347,694	)	$	119,005
Year Ended December 31, 2010	$	119,005	$	201,032	$	(247,169	)	$	72,868

(1) Uncollectible accounts written off, net of recoveries.

Schedules not listed above have been omitted because they are not applicable, are not required or the information required to be set forth in the schedules is included in the consolidated financial statements or related notes.

3. EXHIBITS

Certain of the agreements filed as exhibits to this Form 10-K contain representations and warranties by the parties to the agreements that have been made solely for the benefit of the parties to the agreement. These representations and warranties:

·	May have been qualified by disclosure that were made to the other parties in connection with the negotiation of the agreements, which disclosures are not necessarily reflected in the agreements;

·	May apply standards of materiality that differ from those of a reasonable investor; and

·	Were made only as of specified dates contained in the agreements and are subject to later developments.

Accordingly, these representations and warranties may not describe the actual state of affairs as of the date they were made or at any other time, and investors should not rely on them as statements of fact.

Number	Description

3.1	Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3(i).1 to the Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2004, filed on August 12, 2004)

3.2	Bylaws of Onvia (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to the Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2000, filed on April 2, 2001)

4.1	Form of Onvia’s Common Stock Certificate (incorporated by reference to the Registration Statement on Form S-1 dated December 21, 1999, as amended (File No. 333-93273))

4.2	Form of Rights Agreement between the Company and U.S. Stock Transfer Corp. as a Rights Agent (including as Exhibit A the form of Certificate of Designation, Preferences and Rights of the Terms of the Series RP Preferred Stock, as Exhibit B the form of the Right Certificate, and as Exhibit C the Summary of Terms of Rights Agreement) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 from the Form 8-K, filed on November 25, 2002)

10.1*	Onvia, Inc. 2008 Equity Incentive Plan (incorporated by Reference to the 2008 Proxy Statement filed on August 4, 2008)

10.2*	Amended Onvia, Inc. Savings and Retirement Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 from the Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004, filed on March 25, 2005)

10.3*	Form of Indemnification Agreement between Onvia and each of its officers and directors (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 the Registration Statement on Form S-1 filed on December 21, 1999 (File No. 333-93273))

10.4*	Amended 2000 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (incorporated by Reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2008, filed on November 14, 2008)

10.5*	2000 Directors’ Stock Option Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.26 to the Registration Statement on Form S-1/A filed on February 2, 2000 (File No. 333-93273))

10.6*	Third Amendment to Employment and Noncompetition Agreement with Michael D. Pickett dated September 27, 2002 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2002, filed on November 6, 2002)

10.7*	Employment Agreement with Irvine N. Alpert dated February 22, 2002 and Commission and Bonus Plan with Irvine N. Alpert dated September 11, 2001 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001, filed on March 29, 2002)

10.8*	Medical Dental Building Lease Agreement between Onvia and GRE 509 Olive LLC, dated July 31, 2007 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.12 to the Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2007, filed on November 14, 2007)

10.9*	Separation and Release Agreement with Michael J. Tannourji, dated February 5, 2010 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.11 to the Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2009, filed on March 31, 2010)

10.10*	Second Amendment to 2000 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (incorporated by Reference to Exhibit 10.13 to the Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2010, filed on May 17, 2010)

10.11*	Executive Transition Services Agreement with Michael D. Pickett, dated May 17, 2010 (incorporated by Reference to Exhibit 10.14 to the Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2010, filed on August 11, 2010)

10.12*	Offer Letter to Henry G. Riner, dated August 26, 2010 (incorporated by Reference to Exhibit 10.15 to the Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2010, filed on November 15, 2010)

10.13*	Executive Transition Services Agreement with Michael S. Balsam, dated November 1, 2010 (incorporated by Reference to Exhibit 10.16 to the Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2010, filed on November 15, 2010)

10.14*	Separation and Release Agreement with Eric T. Gillespie, dated November 4, 2010 (incorporated by Reference to Exhibit 10.17 to the Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2010, filed on November 15, 2010)

10.16++	2011 Management Incentive Plan

10.17++	2011 Variable Compensation Plan for Irvine N. Alpert

31.1++	Certification of Henry G. Riner, Chief Executive Officer and President of Onvia, Inc., Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a), as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

31.2++	Certification of Cameron S. Way, Chief Financial Officer of Onvia, Inc., Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a), as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

32.1++	Certification of Henry G. Riner, Chief Executive Officer and President of Onvia, Inc., Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

32.2++	Certification of Cameron S. Way, Chief Financial Officer of Onvia, Inc., Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

* Executive Compensation Plan or Agreement

++ Filed Herewith

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, the registrant has duly caused this Report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, in the City of Seattle, State of Washington, on March 16, 2010.

ONVIA, INC.

By:	/s/ Henry G. Riner
	Henry G. Riner
	President and Chief Executive Officer

By:	/s/ Cameron S. Way
	Cameron S. Way
	Chief Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer

POWER OF ATTORNEY

KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that each of the undersigned, being a director or officer of Onvia, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), hereby constitutes and appoints Henry G. Riner and Cameron S. Way, and each of them, his true and lawful attorney-in-fact and agent, with full power of substitution and re-substitution, for him and in his name, place and stead in any and all capacities, to sign one or more Annual Reports for the Company’s fiscal year ended December 31, 2010, on Form 10-K under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, any amendments thereto, and all additional amendments thereto, each in such form as they or any one of them may approve, and to file the same with all exhibits thereto and other documents in connection therewith with the Securities and Exchange Commission, granting unto said attorneys-in-fact and agents, and each of them, full power and authority to do and perform each and every act and thing requisite and necessary to be done so that such Annual Report shall comply with the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and the applicable Rules and Regulations adopted or issued pursuant thereto, as fully and to all intents and purposes as he might or could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that said attorneys-in-fact and agents, or any of them or their substitute or re-substitute, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1934, this Report has been signed below by the following persons, on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

Signature	Title	Date

/S/ HENRY G. RINER	Chief Executive Officer, President and Director	March 16, 2011
Henry G. Riner

/S/ CAMERON S. WAY	Chief Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer	March 16, 2011
Cameron S. Way

/S/ MICHAEL D. PICKETT	Director	March 16, 2011
Michael D. Pickett

/S/ JEFFREY C. BALLOWE	Director	March 16, 2011
Jeffrey C. Ballowe

/S/ JAMES L. BRILL	Director	March 16, 2011
James L. Brill

/S/ ROBERT G. BROWN	Lead Director	March 16, 2011
Robert G. Brown

/S/ ROGER L. FELDMAN	Director	March 16, 2011
Roger L. Feldman

/S/ Michael E.S. Frankel	Director	March 16, 2011
Michael E.S. Frankel

/S/ D. VAN SKILLING	Chairman of the Board	March 16, 2011
D. Van Skilling

Attached files

Stock widget

Investing forum

ONVIA INC Reports