U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D. C. 20549

Form 10-K

(Mark One)

þ		Annual Report pursuant to section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010

o		Transition report pursuant to section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

		for the transition period from                      to

Commission file number: 000-51868

CORNERSTONE REALTY FUND, LLC

(Exact name of the registrant as specified in its charter)

California		33-0827161
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)		(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

1920 Main Street, Suite 400, Irvine, California 92614
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)

949-852-1007
(Registrant’s Telephone Number, Including Area Code)

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Title of Each Class:
None

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

Title of Each Class:
Units of limited liability company interests

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes o     No þ

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes o     No þ

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Sections 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ     No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes o     No o

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. þ

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filed, or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act): Yes o     No þ

The aggregate market value of the units of membership interest held by non-affiliates of the registrant was $34,337,000 as of the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter (June 30, 2010) based upon the estimated liquidation value of the Registrant’s assets, as determined by the managing member.

Documents incorporated by reference. None.

 

 

PART I

SPECIAL NOTE ABOUT FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

Certain statements in this report, other than purely historical information, including estimates, projections, statements relating to our business plans, objectives and expected operating results, and the assumptions upon which those statements are based, are “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. These forward-looking statements generally are identified by the words “believes,” “project,” “expects,” “anticipates,” “estimates,” “intends,” “strategy,” “plan,” “may,” “will,” “would,” “will be,” “will continue,” “will likely result,” and similar expressions. Forward-looking statements are based on current expectations and assumptions that are subject to risks and uncertainties which may cause actual results to differ materially from the forward-looking statements. Accordingly, there can be no assurance that our expectations will be realized.

Factors which may cause actual results to differ materially from current expectations include, but are not limited to:

	•		National and local economic and business conditions;
	•		General and local real estate conditions;
	•		Changes in federal, state and local governmental laws and regulations and
	•		The availability of and costs associated with sources of liquidity.

A detailed discussion of these and other risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results and events to differ materially from such forward-looking statements is included in the section entitled “Risk Factors” in Item 1A of this report. We undertake no obligation to update or revise publicly any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.

As used in this report, “we,” “us” and “our” refer to Cornerstone Realty Fund, LLC except where the context otherwise requires.

ITEM 1. BUSINESS

Overview

Cornerstone Realty Fund, LLC is a California limited liability company (the “Fund”) that was formed in October of 1998 to invest in multi-tenant business parks catering to small business tenants. Our properties are located in major metropolitan areas in the United States and are owned on an all cash basis without debt financing.

Our managing member is Cornerstone Industrial Properties, LLC (“CIP”), a California limited liability company. CIP is managed by Cornerstone Ventures, Inc. Cornerstone Ventures, Inc. is an experienced real estate operating company specializing in the acquisition, operation and repositioning of multi-tenant industrial business parks.

On August 7, 2001, we commenced a public offering of units of our membership interest pursuant to a registration statement on Form S-11 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to the Securities Act of 1933. On August 18, 2005, we completed our public offering of these units. As of that date, we had issued 100,000 units to unit holders for gross offering proceeds of $50,000,000, before discounts of $39,780.

Description of Business

We are a real estate fund that seeks return on our investments through the acquisition, management and sale of multi-tenant industrial business parks. We have purchased and operate a diversified portfolio of six existing leased multi-tenant industrial business parks catering to the small business tenant.

Our properties are located in major metropolitan areas in the United States. These are geographic areas nationwide that have historically demonstrated strong levels of demand for rental space by tenants requiring small industrial buildings. We have properties located in the Los Angeles, Chicago and Phoenix areas.

We have acquired only completed properties that generate current income from rental operations. Our strategy has been to acquire such properties at prices below what our managing member estimates to be the new development cost of a similar property located within the same competitive geographic area. In stabilized market areas with high tenant demand, a tenant with an expiring lease may not be able to find a competitive space to rent, causing rental rates and property values to rise to the levels necessary to justify the construction of competitive properties. If this occurs, we could experience financial gain as a result of having purchased properties at prices below their new development cost.

Multi-Tenant Business Parks

Multi-tenant business parks comprise one of the major segments of the commercial real estate market on a nationwide basis. These properties contain a large number of diversified tenants and differ from large warehouse and manufacturing buildings that rely on a single tenant. Multi-tenant business parks are ideal for small businesses that require both office and warehouse space. This combination of office and warehouse space cannot generally be met in other commercial property types. Multi-tenant business park tenants come from a broad spectrum of industries including light manufacturing, assembly, distribution, import/export, general contractors, telecommunications, computer technology, general office/warehouse, wholesale, service, high-tech and other fields. Leasing activity is typically diversified, with smaller-sized tenants. These properties diversify revenue by generating rental income from multiple businesses instead of relying on one or two large tenants.

The properties we have acquired cater to the small business tenant and have lease terms generally ranging from one to five years. During economic conditions when rental rates are rising rapidly, the short-term leases should allow us to increase rental income at a faster rate than properties with longer-term leases.

One of the most attractive features of multi-tenant business parks is the ability to adapt to changing market conditions and to meet the diversification needs of small business tenants. A multi-tenant business park is the first home for many small businesses. In good economic times, new businesses are forming and existing businesses are growing. Multi-tenant business parks can accommodate this growth with a tenant’s expansion into multiple units. In difficult economic times such as those currently being experienced, a tenant’s space requirements often contracts, and tenants who previously outgrew their space in a multi-tenant business park may move back. Accordingly multi-tenant industrial park space is in demand in both growing and declining economies.

Investment Strategy

Cornerstone Ventures, Inc. specializes in and has substantial operating experience investing in and operating multi-tenant business parks, offering in-depth real estate expertise through an experienced team of industry professionals with extensive understanding of industrial real estate.

Our investment strategy has been to purchase properties in major industrial markets with considerable tenant demand. We acquired properties in areas with strong tenant demand and a large base of existing industrial properties, a high population of small business tenants and substantial competitive barriers to entry.

Our strategy has involved purchasing multi-tenant business parks at prices below replacement cost. Such opportunities may exist where rental rates at properties configured for the small business tenant are below the levels necessary to justify the development of new projects.

We regularly conduct portfolio property reviews and, if appropriate, we make determinations to dispose of properties that we do not believe meet our strategic criteria based on economic, market and other circumstances.

Compared to single-user industrial properties that typically have longer lease terms, the shorter-term multi-tenant business park leases allow for greater opportunities to increase rents and maximize revenue growth in upward trending markets. Our investment strategy has been to purchase and reposition properties and capitalize on shorter lease terms, rising rents, increasing cash flow and capital appreciation.

Our portfolio is comprised of multi-tenant properties serving the small business tenant in three major metropolitan markets. The highest dollar amount we have invested in any single property is $9.9 million. As of December 31, 2010, we had purchased a total of seven properties for an aggregate investment of approximately $37.5 million. On April 16, 2007, we sold one of our properties to an unaffiliated third party for gross proceeds of $3.2 million. We do not expect to acquire additional properties.

Potential Liquidation Transaction

In anticipation of the Fund’s scheduled dissolution date of December 31, 2012, our managing member has begun the process of evaluating strategic alternatives for winding up the Fund in order to maximize overall returns for our unit holders. Our managing member initiated the examination at this time, rather than waiting until 2012 because of the inherent uncertainty of the future and our managing member’s view of (i) the current market conditions, (ii) the current increasing costs of corporate compliance (including, without limitation, all federal, state and local regulatory requirements applicable to us, including the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, as amended), and (iii) the other factors discussed in more detail below.

Table of Contents

After a thorough analysis and consultation with a real estate broker specializing in multitenant industrial real estate in the geographical regions where our properties are located, our managing member has concluded that a liquidation of the Fund at this time will more likely produce superior returns within a reasonable period of time to our unit holders than other potential exit strategies reasonably available to us, including waiting until 2012 to complete a liquidation. As a result, our managing member currently expects to distribute a proxy statement to our unit holders to solicit consents from our unit holders to authorize a plan of liquidation of the Fund involving the sale of all of the Fund’s properties to an unaffiliated third party.

In reaching its determination, our managing member has considered the following factors, among others:

	•		the significant costs of compliance with federal, state and local tax filings and reports under the applicable provisions of the Internal Revenue Code;
	•		our managing member’s review of possible alternatives to a liquidation, including: issuing additional equity; raising additional debt financing; seeking to dispose of our assets through a merger; following which based on a variety of factors, our managing member concluded that none of the alternatives considered were reasonably likely to provide greater value to our unit holders than a liquidation of the Fund’s asset through an asset sale;
	•		the aggregate cash liquidating distributions that our managing member estimates that such a liquidation transaction would generate for our unit holders;
	•		the results of a targeted bid process conducted through an unaffiliated real-estate broker to market our properties to likely buyers;
	•		our managing member’s evaluation is based on industry forecast, or expected increases in rental rates in 2011 and 2012.
	•		our managing member’s belief that the range of cash liquidating distributions that we estimate we will make to our unit holders will be fair relative to its assessment of our current and expected future financial condition, earnings, business opportunities, strategies and competitive position and the nature of the market environment in which we operate;
	•		the current and expected future illiquidity of units resulting from applicable transfer restrictions that will continue if we continue as a going concern; and
	•		that the per unit price to be received by unit holders in the liquidation would be payable in cash or interests in a liquidating trust (which would distribute any remaining net proceeds of the liquidation in cash), thereby eliminating uncertainties in valuing the consideration to be received by unit holders.

Our managing member believes that each of these factors generally support its determination. However, the above discussion concerning the information and factors considered is not intended to be exhaustive, but includes material factors considered by our managing member. In view of the variety of factors considered in connection with their evaluation of the plan of liquidation and the proposed liquidation, our managing member did not quantify or otherwise attempt to assign relative weights to the factors it considered. Unit holders should read in full and carefully consider the proxy statement to be distributed by the managing member relating to a potential liquidation transaction.

Property Features

Land: Lot sizes for our properties range from approximately 1.6 to 5.0 acres depending upon the number of buildings and building sizes. Individual buildings contained in any specific property may be located on a single parcel of land or on multiple parcels of land depending upon the configuration and layout of the entire project. Sites are zoned for industrial, commercial and/or office uses depending on local governmental regulations. The location of each property is an important factor in its future value. We have purchased properties in what we considered to be in prime locations.

Buildings: The buildings comprising our properties are generally rectangular in shape and constructed utilizing concrete tilt up construction methods and in some cases brick and mortar methods. Building sizes range from 30,000 to 86,000 square feet divided into leasable unit sizes ranging from approximately 100 square feet to 20,000 square feet. Generally our buildings include the following features:

	•		Functional site plan offering ample tenant parking and good truck and car circulation;
	•		Multiple truck doors with ground level and dock high loading;

	•		Ceiling clear heights in each tenant space from 14 feet to 24 feet;
	•		Attractive front entry and visibility with a location for tenant’s address and sign;
	•		Quality office improvements including private offices, restrooms and reception area;
	•		Minimum of 100 amps of electrical service;
	•		Heating, ventilating and air conditioning systems for the office area; and
	•		Fire sprinklers where required by local governmental agencies.

Property Selection

The experienced staff of our managing member were responsible for the selection and evaluation of properties that we acquired. The acquisition process was performed by our managing member with no acquisition fees payable by us to our managing member. All property acquisitions were evaluated by our managing member based upon its experience in the area of multi-tenant business parks and our investment objectives and supported by appraisals prepared by a competent independent appraiser.

The Asset Management Function

Asset management includes preparation, implementation, supervision and monitoring of a business plan specifically designed for each property. Our managing member performs the following asset management services for us:

	•		Creates and implements an individualized plan for enhancing the profitability and value of each property;
	•		Supervises the day-to-day operations of property managers assigned to each property;
	•		Selects and supervises the on-going marketing efforts of leasing agents responsible for marketing the property to prospective tenants;
	•		Coordinates semi-annual rental surveys of competitive projects in the local geographic area — this function is designed to maintain the property at the highest possible rental rates allowable in the market where the property is located;
	•		Approves lease terms negotiated by leasing agents with new tenants and tenants renewing their leases — this includes making sure that lease rates being attained are in line with market conditions as well as in line with the then current operating plan for the property;
	•		Reviews and approves any capital improvements necessary at the property, including tenant improvements necessary to lease space;
	•		Reviews monthly financial reports prepared by property managers with a focus on improving the cost efficiency of operating the property;
	•		Prepares annual property operating budgets for review and approval by senior management; and
	•		Prepares regular updates regarding operations of the property as compared to budget estimates.

Although most real estate operating companies charge a separate fee for asset management services, our managing member does not charge us a separate fee for such services. However, our managing member is entitled to receive an incentive share of our net cash flows from operations, as described under Item 13. “Certain Relationships and Related Transactions.”

Property Management Services

Our managing member is responsible for providing or obtaining property management services for our properties and is responsible for overseeing all day-to-day operations for each property, including the following:

	•		Invoice tenants for monthly rent;
	•		Collect rents;

	•		Pay property level operating expenses;
	•		Solicit bids from vendors for monthly contract services;
	•		Provide property level financial reports on a monthly basis;
	•		Review and comment on annual property operating budgets;
	•		On-going assessment of potential risks or hazards at the property;
	•		Clean up and prepare vacant units to be leased;
	•		Supervise tenant improvement construction;
	•		Supervise tenant and owner compliance with lease terms;
	•		Supervise tenant compliance with insurance requirements;
	•		Periodically inspect tenant spaces for lease compliance; and
	•		Respond to tenant inquiries.

Due to the short-term nature of the tenant leases, as well as the large number of small business tenants at each property, multi-tenant business parks are management intensive. For this reason, property management fees for multi-tenant industrial properties are generally higher than property management fees for other types of commercial real estate. Our managing member believes that a very high level of property management service and strict property maintenance standards maximizes the value of each property. Our managing member may subcontract property management services with either an affiliate or third party property management organization. Currently, our properties are managed under subcontracts with CB Richard Ellis, Inc., Essex Realty Management, Inc. and Corporate Facility Services Inc. none of which are affiliated with us or with our managing member.

Government Regulations

The properties we own are subject to federal, state and local laws and regulations relating to environmental protection and human health and safety. Federal laws such as the National Environmental Policy Act, the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act, the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, the Federal Clean Air Act, the Toxic Substances Control Act, the Emergency Planning and Community Right to Know Act and the Hazard Communication Act govern such matters as wastewater discharges, air emissions, the operation and removal of underground and above-ground storage tanks, the use, storage, treatment, transportation and disposal of solid and hazardous materials and the remediation of contamination associated with disposals. Some of these laws and regulations impose joint and several liabilities on tenants, owners or operators for the costs to investigate or remediate contaminated properties, regardless of fault or whether the acts causing the contamination were legal. Compliance with these laws and any new or more stringent laws or regulations may require us to incur material expenditures. Future laws, ordinances or regulations may impose material environmental liability. In addition, there are various federal, state and local fire, health, life-safety and similar regulations with which we may be required to comply, and which may subject us to liability in the form of fines or damages for noncompliance.

Our properties may be affected by our tenants’ operations, the existing condition of land when we buy it, operations in the vicinity of our properties, such as the presence of underground storage tanks, or activities of unrelated third parties. The presence of hazardous substances, or the failure to properly remediate these substances, may make it difficult or impossible to sell or rent such property.

Under various federal, state and local environmental laws, ordinances and regulations, a current or previous real property owner or operator may be liable for the cost to remove or remediate hazardous or toxic substances on, under or in such property. These costs could be substantial. Such laws often impose liability whether or not the owner or operator knew of, or was responsible for, the presence of such hazardous or toxic substances. Environmental laws also may impose restrictions on the manner in which property may be used or businesses may be operated, and these restrictions may require substantial expenditures or prevent us from entering into leases with prospective tenants that may be impacted by such laws. Environmental laws provide for sanctions for noncompliance and may be enforced by governmental agencies or, in certain circumstances, by private parties. Certain environmental laws and common law principles could be used to impose liability for release of and exposure to hazardous substances, including asbestos-containing materials into the air. Third parties may seek recovery from real property owners or operators for personal injury or property damage associated with exposure to released hazardous substances. The cost of defending against claims of liability, of complying with environmental regulatory requirements, of remediating any contaminated property, or of paying personal injury claims could be substantial.

We obtained satisfactory Phase I environmental assessments on each property we purchased. A Phase I assessment is an inspection and review of the property, its existing and prior uses, aerial maps and records of government agencies for the purpose of determining the likelihood of environmental contamination. A Phase I assessment includes only non-invasive testing. It is possible that all environmental liabilities were not identified in the Phase I assessments we obtained or that a prior owner, operator or current occupant has created an environmental condition which we do not know about. There can be no assurance that future law, ordinances or regulations will not impose material environmental liability on us or that the current environmental condition of our properties will not be affected by our tenants, or by the condition of land or operations in the vicinity of our properties such as the presence of underground storage tanks or groundwater contamination.

Competition

We experience competition for tenants from owners and managers of comparable projects which may include our managing member and its affiliates. As a result, we may be required to provide free rent, reduced charges for tenant improvements, and other inducements, all of which may have an adverse impact on our results of operations. At the time we elect to dispose of our properties, we will also be in competition with sellers of similar properties to locate suitable purchasers.

Employees and Resources

We have no direct employees. Employees of Cornerstone Ventures, Inc., an affiliate of our managing member, perform a full range of real estate services including leasing, property management, accounting, asset management and investor relations for us. Our managing member may also engage consultants to provide these services when our managing member deems this to be in our best interest. See Item 13 — “Certain Relationships and Related Transactions” for a summary of the types of fees to be paid to our managing member and its affiliates for its services.

Our managing member provides us with office space for our operations without charge.

Available Information

Information about us is available on our website (http://www.crefunds.com). We make available, free of charge, on our Internet website, our annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, and amendments to those reports filed pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act as soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically file such material with the SEC. These materials are also available at no cost in print to any person who requests it by contacting our Investor Services Department at 1920 Main Street, Suite 400, Irvine, California 92614; telephone (877) 805-3333. Our filings with the SEC are available to the public over the Internet at the SEC’s website at http://www.sec.gov. You may read and copy any filed document at the SEC’s public reference room in Washington, D.C. at 100 F Street, N.E., Room 1580, Washington D.C. Please call the SEC at (800) SEC-0330 for further information about the public reference rooms.

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS

The risks and uncertainties described below can adversely affect our business, operating results, prospects and financial condition. These risks and uncertainties could cause our actual results to differ materially from those presented in our forward-looking statements.

Recent disruptions in the financial markets and deteriorating economic conditions could adversely affect the values of our investments and our ongoing operations. During 2010, significant and widespread concerns about credit risk and access to capital experienced during 2009 began to subside. Concerns of a double-dip recession have diminished as a number of economic indicators have improved. Increased trade volume in 2010 spurred increased leasing activity in many west coast industrial markets. However, if the current economic uncertainty persists, we may continue to experience significant vacancies or be required to reduce rental rates on occupied space resulting in lower occupancy and declining values in our current portfolio. While there have been signs of stabilization in the economy and credit markets continued volatility may adversely affect our liquidity and financial condition. The current downturn may impact our tenants’ business operations directly, reducing their ability to pay base rent, percentage rent or other charges due to us.

The occurrence of these events could have the following negative effects on us:

	•		the values of our investments in commercial properties could decrease below the amounts we paid for the investments;
	•		we may not be able to sell our properties at an attractive price and the time to effect a sale at any price may be extended; and
	•		revenues from our properties could decrease due to lower occupancy rates, reduced rental rates and potential increases in uncollectible receivables;

These factors could impair our ability to make distributions to you and decrease the value of your investment in us.

Financial markets are still recovering from a period of disruption and recession, and we are unable to predict if and when the economy will stabilize or improve. The financial markets are still recovering from a recession, which created volatile market conditions, resulted in a decrease in availability of business credit and led to the insolvency, closure or acquisition of a number of financial institutions. While the markets showed signs of stabilizing throughout 2010, it remains unclear when the economy will fully recover to pre-recession levels. Continued economic weakness in the U.S. economy generally or a new recession would likely adversely affect our financial condition and that of our tenants and could impact the ability of our tenants to pay rent to us.

We may not generate sufficient cash for distributions. If the cash flow generated by operation of the properties we own is not sufficient to fully fund distributions, we may fund distributions from cash reserves, from the proceeds of a sale of a property or incur financing upon unit holders’ approval. If the rental revenues from the properties we own do not exceed our operational expenses, or our cash reserves are depleted or we cannot incur indebtedness, we will not be able to make cash distributions until such time as we sell a property.

We may incur debt financing to meet operational expenses and to fund our distributions. Effective April 27, 2010, our operating agreement was amended to allow the managing member to cause us to incur debt financing, not to exceed ten percent of the capital contributions of all unit holders, to meet our operational expenses or to fund cash distributions declared and paid to members. On December 2, 2010, we entered into a $4.0 million fixed rate secured loan to provide liquidity for these purposes. To the extent we borrow funds, we may raise additional equity capital or sell properties to pay such debt. If we incur debt, we would be subject to various risks associated with the use of debt financing. Interest we pay could reduce overall returns to unit holders. Additionally, if we incur variable rate debt, increases in interest rates would increase our interest costs, which would reduce our cash flows and overall returns to unit holders. In addition, if we need to repay existing debt during periods of rising interest rates, we could be required to liquidate one or more of our investments in properties at times which may not permit realization of the maximum return on such investments and could result in a loss.

We are dependent upon our managing member and its affiliates to conduct our operations. Any adverse changes in the financial health of our managing member or its affiliates or our relationship with them could hinder our operating performance and the return on investments in us. We are dependent on our managing member, Cornerstone Industrial Properties, LLC, to manage our operations and our portfolio of real estate assets. Our managing member has limited operating history and it depends upon the fees and other compensation that it receives from us in connection with the purchase, management and sale of our properties to conduct its operations. To date, the fees we pay to our managing member have been inadequate to cover its operating expenses. To cover its operational shortfalls, our managing member has relied on cash raised in private offerings. A FINRA inquiry concluded in December 2009, which relates to such private offerings, could adversely affect the success of such private offerings or future private capital-raising efforts. If our managing member is unable to secure additional capital, it may become unable to meet its obligations and we

might be required to find alternative service providers, which could result in a significant disruption of our business and may adversely affect the value of your investment in us.

Our managing member, its affiliates, and its officers also have management responsibilities to other entities. Cornerstone Industrial Properties, LLC and Cornerstone Ventures, Inc. may have conflicts of interests in allocating management time between us and other entities. These other entities will purchase, operate and sell the same type of properties, which we purchase, own and operate. Our managing member, which is operated by Cornerstone Ventures, Inc., may have conflicts of interest in deciding whether or not to sell a property since the interest of our managing member and the interests of our unit holders may differ as a result of their financial and tax position and the compensation to which our managing member or affiliates may be entitled to receive upon the sale of a property.

Our managing member and its affiliates receive fees and other compensation based upon the property we own and the sale of our properties and therefore our managing member and its affiliates may make recommendations to us that we hold or sell property in order to increase their compensation. Our managing member will have considerable discretion with respect to the terms and timing of our disposition and leasing transactions. Our managing member and its affiliates receive fees and other compensation related to the management of our investments. In some instances our managing member and its affiliates may benefit by us retaining ownership of our assets, while our unit holders may be better served by sale or disposition. In other instances they may benefit by us selling the properties which may entitle our managing member to disposition fees and possible success-based sales fees. In addition, our managing member’s ability to receive asset management fees and reimbursements depends on our continued investment in properties and in other assets which generate fees to them. Therefore, the interest of our managing member and its affiliates in receiving fees may conflict with our interests.

Multi-tenant industrial properties accommodating small business tenants have a substantial on-going risk of tenant lease defaults. If a tenant defaults on a lease, we will generally lose rental income and have to pay legal costs, repair costs and re-leasing commissions. We may be unable to re-lease the property for as much rent as we previously received. We may incur additional expenditures in re-leasing the property. We could experience delays in enforcing our rights and collecting rents due from a defaulting tenant.

Risks we cannot control will affect the value of our properties. The values of the properties we purchase will be affected by:

	•		changes in the general economic climate;
	•		oversupply of space or reduced demand for real estate in local area;
	•		competition from other available space;
	•		governmental regulations;
	•		changes in zoning or tax laws;
	•		interest rate levels;
	•		availability of financing; and
	•		potential liability under environmental laws.

These factors may cause our rental income and the value of our properties to decrease and may make it difficult for us to sell properties.

Lease terminations could reduce our revenues from rents and our distributions to our unit holders and cause the value of our unit holders’ investment in us to decline. The success of our investments depends upon the occupancy levels, rental income and operating expenses of our properties and our company. In the event of tenant default or bankruptcy, we may experience delays in enforcing our rights as landlord and may incur costs in protecting our investment and re-leasing our property. We may be unable to re-lease the property for the rent previously received. We may be unable to sell a property with low occupancy without incurring a loss. These events and others could cause us to reduce the amount of distributions we make to unit holders and the value of our unit holders’ investment in us to decline.

Rising expenses at both the property and the company level could reduce our net income and our cash available for distribution to unit holders. Our properties are subject to operating risks common to real estate in general, any or all of which may reduce our net income. If any property is not substantially occupied or if rents are being paid in an amount that is insufficient to cover operating

expenses, we could be required to expend funds with respect to that property for operating expenses. The properties are subject to increases in tax rates, utility costs, operating expenses, insurance costs, repairs and maintenance and administrative expenses. If we are unable to lease properties on a basis requiring the tenants to pay such expenses, we would be required to pay some or all of those costs which would reduce our income and cash available for distribution to unit holders.

We may experience uninsured losses on our properties. We intend to maintain commercial general liability insurance and property damage insurance on our properties. We believe this insurance will be adequate to cover most risks. We may not obtain earthquake insurance on our properties due to the lack of available and affordable earthquake insurance. If one of our properties sustains damage as a result of an earthquake, we may incur substantial losses and lose our investment in the property. If we, as a property owner, incur any liability that is not fully covered by insurance, we would be liable for such amounts.

We may be subject to environmental liabilities. Various federal and state environmental laws and regulations to investigate and clean up hazardous or toxic substances, asbestos-containing materials, or petroleum product releases at the property may require an owner or operator of real estate. The presence of contamination or the failure to remedy contamination will adversely affect the owner’s ability to sell or lease real estate. The owner or operator of a site may be liable to third parties for damages and injuries resulting from environmental contamination.

We will not seek any rulings from the Internal Revenue Service regarding any tax issues. We are relying on opinions of our legal counsel. The opinions are based upon representations and assumptions and conditioned upon the existence of specified facts. The opinions are not binding on the IRS or the courts.

If we lose our “partnership” status we would be taxed as a corporation. Our legal counsel has advised us that we will be treated as a “partnership” for federal income tax purposes and that we will not be treated as an association taxable as a corporation, subject to the publicly traded partnership rules. The application of “publicly traded partnership” rules to us will be based upon future facts. The IRS may determine that we will be treated as a “publicly traded partnership” if our units of membership interests are publicly traded or frequently transferred. We have included provisions in our operating agreement designed to avoid this result. If we were to be reclassified as an association taxable as a corporation or classified as a publicly traded partnership, we would be taxed on our net income at rates of up to 35% for federal income tax purposes. All items of our income, gain, loss, deduction, and credit would be reflected only on our tax returns and would not be passed through to our unit holders. If we were treated as a corporation, distributions to our unit holders would be ordinary dividend income to the extent of our earnings and profits, and the payment of such dividends would not be deductible by us.

The IRS may challenge our allocations of income, gain, loss, and deduction. The operating agreement provides for the allocation of income, gain, loss and deduction among the unit holders. The rules regarding partnership allocations are complex. It is possible that the IRS could successfully challenge the allocations in the operating agreement and reallocate items of income, gain, loss or deduction in a manner that reduces benefits or increases income allocable our investors.

The IRS may disallow deduction of fees and expenses or reallocate basis. The IRS may challenge or disallow our deduction of some or all fees and expenses. The IRS could seek to reallocate our basis in properties among land, improvements and personal property. This could result in reduced tax losses or increased income without a corresponding increase in net cash flow to our unit holders.

Future events may result in federal income tax treatment of us and our unit holders that is materially and adversely different from the current tax treatment. Changes in current law, including the internal revenue code, the treasury regulations, administrative interpretations, and court decisions, could affect taxable years arising before and after such events. There can be no assurance that future legislation and administrative interpretations will not be applied retroactively.

ITEM 1B.		UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS

None.

ITEM 2.		PROPERTIES

As of the date of this report, we own six properties: Normandie Business Center in Torrance, California; Arrow Business Center in Irwindale, California; Zenith Business Centre in Glenview, Illinois; Paramount Business Center in Paramount, California; Interstate Commerce Center in Tempe, Arizona; and Shoemaker Industrial Park in Santa Fe Spring, California. We purchased these properties for all cash, without debt financing.

Our properties were built between 1978 and 1989 and are currently in good physical condition. We intend to make modest repairs and improvements to this property over the next two years.

Although a considerable number of leases expire within the next twelve months, most tenants’ average tenure at the property exceeds 5 years and typically smaller “mom-and-pops” tenants renew on a one year basis with our larger corporate tenants renewing for 3 to 5 years. Existing leases at the property generally include annual rental increases ranging between 3% and 5%.

Following are descriptions of our properties:

Normandie Business Center, Torrance, CA

On September 27, 2002, we purchased an existing multi-tenant industrial park known as Normandie Business Center. Normandie Business Center is located on approximately 2.45 acres and is comprised of two single-story buildings built in 1989 consisting of approximately 49,416 leasable square feet. Our total acquisition cost was approximately $3.9 million. As of December 31, 2010, this property was 69.9% leased to 20 tenants whose spaces range in size from 1,200 to 3,358 square feet.

The property is located in Torrance, California, and is in the South Bay submarket of Los Angeles. The South Bay is one of the largest and most active industrial submarkets in Los Angeles County near the ports of Los Angeles and Long Beach.

The property’s historical occupancy rates are as follows:

Year Ending		Average Annual
December 31		Occupancy (%)
2006			94	%
2007			95	%
2008			96	%
2009			98	%
2010			81	%

The following table sets forth lease expiration information for the next five years for those leases in place at December 31, 2010:

						Approx.								Percent of
						Amount of				Base Rent of				Total				Percent of
						Expiring				Expiring				Leasable				Total Annual
		No. of Leases				Leases (Sq.				Leases				Area				Base Rent
Year Ending December 31		Expiring				Feet)				(Annual $)				Expiring (%)				Expiring (%)
Month to month			3				3,725			$	42,000				7.5	%			10.8	%
2011			11				19,000				216,000				38.5	%			55.7	%
2012			4				6,056				66,000				12.3	%			17.0	%
2013			2				4,558				64,000				9.2	%			16.5	%
2014			—				—				—				—				—
2015 and thereafter			—				—				—				—				—
			20				33,339			$	388,000				67.5	%			100.0	%

Arrow Business Park, Irwindale, California

On December 10, 2003, we purchased an existing multi-tenant business park known as the Arrow Business Center, a single-story three building property built in 1987 consisting of approximately 69,592 square feet of leasable space on approximately 5.04 acres of land. Our total acquisition cost was approximately $6.0 million. As of December 31, 2010, the property was 80.22% leased to 29 tenants which includes two tenants with two leases each, whose spaces range in size from approximately 800 square feet to 4,800 square feet. The property’s historical occupancy rates are as follows:

Year Ending		Average Annual
December 31		Occupancy (%)
2006			99	%
2007			94	%
2008			89	%
2009			83	%
2010			80	%

The following table sets forth lease expiration information for the next five years for leases in place as of December 31, 2010:

						Approx.								Percent of
						Amount of				Base Rent Of				Total				Percent of
						Expiring				Expiring				Leasable				Total Annual
Year Ending		No. of Leases				Leases (Sq.				Leases				Area				Base Rent
December 31		Expiring				Feet)				(Annual $)				Expiring (%)				Expiring (%)
Month to month			6				6,240			$	72,000				9.0	%			12.7	%
2011			12				21,210				207,000				30.4	%			36.1	%
2012			9				18,702				194,000				26.9	%			34.0	%
2013			4				9,680				98,000				13.9	%			17.2	%
2014			—				—				—				—				—
2015 and thereafter			—				—				—				—				—
			31				55,832			$	571,000				80.2	%			100.0	%

Zenith Drive Centre, Glenview, Illinois

On January 25, 2005, we purchased an existing multi-tenant industrial park known as Zenith Drive Centre. Zenith Drive Centre is a single-story, three building property built in 1978 consisting of approximately 37,990 square feet of leasable space on approximately 2.54 acres of land. Our total acquisition cost was approximately $5.3 million. As of December 31, 2010, the property was 94.5% leased to 28 tenants which includes one tenant with two leases and another tenant with three leases, whose spaces range in size from approximately 100 square feet to 6,000 square feet. Included in the acquisition and purchase price of Zenith Drive Centre were a billboard sign and cellular relay antenna located on the property leased to a large media company and communications company, respectively. In the fourth quarter of 2008, we recorded an impairment charge of approximately $1.8 million related to this building. In the third quarter of 2009, we recorded an additional impairment charge of $1.2 million. During the first quarter of 2010, management committed to a plan to sell Zenith Drive Centre to a third party and classified the property as held for sale. The property has not been sold as of December 31, 2010 and accordingly is classified as held for sale. See Note 8 for additional information.

The property’s historical occupancy rates are as follows:

Year Ending		Average Annual
December 31		Occupancy (%)
2006			74	%
2007			92	%
2008			88	%
2009			90	%
2010			94	%

The following table sets forth lease expiration information:

						Approx.								Percent of
						Amount of				Base Rent Of				Total				Percent of
						Expiring				Expiring				Leasable				Total Annual
Year Ending		No. of Leases				Leases (Sq.				Leases				Area				Base Rent
December 31		Expiring				Feet)				(Annual $)				Expiring (%)				Expiring (%)
Month to month			—				—			$	—				—				—
2011			16				19,904				158,000				52.4	%			47.3	%
2012			11				13,535				74,000				35.6	%			22.1	%
2013			3				2,450				69,000				6.5	%			20.7	%
2014			1				—				33,000				—				9.9	%
2015 and thereafter			—				—				—				—				—
			31				35,889				334,000				94.5	%			100.0	%

Clear Channel Communications leases a portion of the land parcel for the purpose of maintaining and displaying a billboard sign. Annual rent is $41,000 paid annually in advance. This lease expires in 2013. Successive five-year extensions run until 2038.

Cingular Wireless leases a portion of the land parcel for the purpose of maintaining and operating a cell-site. This lease expires in 2028. Monthly rent is currently approximately $2,000 per month.

Paramount Business Center, Paramount, California

On April 28, 2005, we purchased an existing multi-tenant industrial park known as Paramount Business Center, a single-story, two building property built in 1985 consisting of approximately 30,157 square feet on approximately 1.66 acres of land. Our total acquisition cost was approximately $3.2 million. As of December 31, 2010, the property was 87.92% leased to 10 tenants whose spaces range in size from 2,025 square feet to 3,794 square feet. In the second and fourth quarter of 2010, we recorded impairment charges of $560,000 and $546,000, respectively, related to this property.

The property’s historical occupancy rates are as follows:

Year Ending		Average Annual
December 31		Occupancy (%)
2006			100	%
2007			96	%
2008			86	%
2009			66	%
2010			72	%

The following table sets forth lease expiration information:

						Approx.								Percent of				Percent of
						Amount of				Base Rent Of				Total				Total Annual
						Expiring				Expiring				Leasable				Base Rent
Year Ending		No. of Leases				Leases (Sq.				Leases				Area				Expiring
December 31		Expiring				Feet)				(Annual $)				Expiring (%)				(%)(1)
Month to month			1				2,191			$	24,000				7.3	%			10.6	%
2011			5				12,094				128,000				40.1	%			56.6	%
2012			3				8,715				53,000				28.9	%			23.5	%
2013			1				3,584				21,000				11.9	%			9.3	%
2014			—				—				—				—				—
2015 and thereafter			—				—				—				—				—
			10				26,584			$	226,000				88.2	%			100	%

Interstate Commerce Center, Tempe, Arizona

On September 30, 2005, we purchased a multi-tenant industrial park built in 1987 in Tempe, Arizona, near the Phoenix airport. This property consists of four buildings totaling 83,385 square feet of leasable space situated on approximately 5.02 acres of land. Our total acquisition cost was approximately $7.5 million. As of December 31, 2010, the property was 100.0% leased to 5 tenants whose spaces range in size from 8,372 square feet to 19,930 square feet. The property’s historical occupancy rates are as follows:

Year Ending		Average Annual
December 31		Occupancy (%)
2006			87	%
2007			100	%
2008			95	%
2009			90	%
2010			98	%

We intend to make modest repairs and improvements to this property over the next two years.

The following table sets forth lease expiration information for the next five years:

						Approx.								Percent of
						Amount of				Base Rent Of				Total				Percent of
						Expiring				Expiring				Leasable				Total Annual
Year Ending		No. of Leases				Leases (Sq.				Leases				Area				Base Rent
December 31		Expiring				Feet)				(Annual $)				Expiring (%)				Expiring (%)
Month to month			—				—			$	—				—				—
2011			—				—				—				—				—
2012			1				14,883				122,000				17.9	%			19.1	%
2013			2				40,200				317,000				48.2	%			49.7	%
2014			1				8,372				46,000				10.0	%			7.2	%
2015 and thereafter			1				19,930				153,000				23.9	%			24.0	%
			5				83,385			$	638,000				100.0	%			100.0	%

Shoemaker Industrial Park, Santa Fe Spring, California

On June 28, 2006 we acquired Shoemaker Industrial Park. The acquisition price was $9.9 million. This property consists of three buildings totaling 86,084 square feet of leasable space situated on approximately 4.0 acres of land. As of December 31, 2010, the property was 83.7% leased to 15 tenants which includes one tenant with two leases, whose spaces range in size from 1,960 square feet to 13,617 square feet. In the fourth quarter of 2009 and 2010, we recorded impairment charges of approximately $1.9 million and $987,000, respectively, related to this property.

The property’s historical occupancy rates are as follows:

Year Ending		Average Annual
Dec 31		Occupancy (%)
2006			79	%
2007			95	%
2008			91	%
2009			78	%
2010			79	%

We intend to make modest repairs and improvements to this property over the next two years.

The following table sets forth lease expiration information for the next five years:

						Approx.
						Amount of				Base Rent Of				Percent of				Percent of
						Expiring				Expiring				Total Leasable				Total Annual
Year Ending		No. of Leases				Leases (Sq.				Leases				Area Expiring				Base Rent
December 31		Expiring				Feet)				(Annual $)				(%)				Expiring (%)
Month to month			1				1,960			$	20,000				2.3	%			3.4	%
2011			7				27,391				245,000				31.8	%			41.6	%
2012			5				26,457				231,000				30.7	%			39.2	%
2013			3				14,246				93,000				16.5	%			15.8	%
2014			—				—				—				—				—
2015 and thereafter			—				—				—				—				—
			16				70,054			$	589,000				81.3	%			100.0	%

ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

From time to time in the ordinary course of business, we may become subject to legal proceeding, claims, or disputes. As of the date hereof, we are not a party to any pending legal proceedings.

There are no pending material legal proceedings to which we or our assets are subject. In addition, no such material proceedings are known to be contemplated against us.

ITEM 4. REMOVED AND RESERVED

PART II

ITEM 5.		MARKET FOR MEMBERSHIP INTERESTS, RELATED MEMBER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

Market Information

There is no established public trading market for our units of membership interests and it is not anticipated that a public trading market for the units will develop. Under our operating agreement, our managing member has the right to refuse to permit the transfer of units in its reasonable discretion.

Holders

On August 18, 2005, we completed our public offering of units. We had sold a total of 100,000 units of membership interest to 1,448 investors for a total investment of $50,000,000. The sale of the units of membership interest was made pursuant to a registration statement on Form S-11 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. As of December 31, 2010, 98,670 units remained outstanding held of record by 1,312 holders.

Distributions

Holders of our units are generally entitled to receive 90% of cash from operations, as defined in the operating agreement, each year until investors receive an 8% cumulative, non-compounded annual return, then 50% of cash from operations. Notwithstanding the foregoing, a 12% cumulative non-compounded annual return applies to specified early investors for the 12-month period subsequent to the date of their capital contributions and is in lieu of the 8% return during that period. Our managing member is entitled to receive the remaining cash from operations. Holders of our units receive 100% of net proceeds from property sales until they have received the return of their capital contributions, then 90% of net proceeds from property sales until they have received an overall 8% non-compounded annual return, taking into account all prior distributions, and thereafter 50% of net proceeds from property sales is paid to the holders of our units and 50% is paid to our managing member.

As of December 31, 2010, we have distributed a total of approximately $16.5 million to our investors since inception, of which approximately $15.7 million was paid to unit holders and approximately $0.8 million was paid to our managing member. Of the amount paid to unit holders, $0.8 million was paid directly from funds of our managing member. We contemplate making distributions quarterly but distributions may be made more or less frequently.

On January 15, 2011, we distributed an additional $649,000 to our investors, of which $622,000 was paid to unit holders and $27,000 was paid to our managing member.

Equity Compensation Plan Information

We do not have any equity compensation plans and no units of membership interests are issuable under any individual compensation arrangement.

Unit Repurchases

On February 22, 2007, our unit holders approved an amendment to the Fund’s operating agreement to eliminate the prohibition on repurchases of units by the Fund and add a provision to the operating agreement specifically permitting the managing member to cause the Fund to repurchase units at any time, and from time to time, on such terms and conditions as the managing member may determine in its sole discretion; provided that such repurchases do not jeopardize the status of the Fund as a partnership for federal income tax purposes or cause the Fund to be treated as a publicly-traded partnership.

As of December 31, 2010, we have redeemed 1,330 units. During the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2010, we repurchased units at the purchase price noted below per unit less a $37.50 per investor transaction fee:

										Approximate Number of
										Units that may yet be
		Total Number of Units				Average Price Paid				purchased under the
Period		Repurchased (1)				per Unit				Program (2)
1st quarter of 2009			105			$	435				575
2nd quarter of 2009			84			$	348				491
3rd quarter of 2009			203			$	348				288
4th quarter of 2009			144			$	348				144
			536
1st quarter of 2010			144			$	348				—	(3)
2nd quarter of 2010			—			$	—				—
3rd quarter of 2010			—			$	—				—
4th quarter of 2010			—			$	—				—
			144

ITEM 6.		SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

The selected financial data set forth below should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and notes thereto and the “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.”

Operating Data

		Years Ended December 31,
		2010 (f)				2009 (d)				2008(e)				2007				2006
Revenues		$	2,846,000			$	3,151,000			$	3,514,000			$	3,502,000			$	2,809,000
(Loss) income from continuing operations			(1,693,000	)			(965,000	)			1,233,000				1,241,000				924,000
Income (loss) from discontinued operations			208,000	(c)			(1,176,000	)(c)			(1,741,000	)(c)			395,000	(b)			(50,000	)(b)
Net (loss) income		$	(1,485,000	)		$	(2,141,000	)		$	(508,000	)		$	1,636,000			$	874,000
Net (loss) income allocable to unit holders		$	(1,337,000	)		$	(1,927,000	)		$	(457,000	)		$	1,472,000			$	787,000
Basic and diluted (loss) income allocable to unit holders per weighted average unit:
(Loss) income from continuing operations		$	(15.44	)		$	(8.76	)		$	11.13			$	11.18			$	8.31
Income from discontinued operations		$	1.89			$	(10.66	)		$	(15.73	)		$	3.55			$	(0.45	)
Basic and diluted weighted average units outstanding			98,713				99,218				99,618				99,930				100,000
Cash distributions per weighted average units outstanding (a)		$	18.90			$	24.99			$	35.06			$	25.02			$	25.00

Balance Sheet Data

		Years Ended December 31,
		2010				2009				2008				2007				2006
Total assets		$	30,285,000			$	29,239,000			$	34,401,000			$	38,830,000			$	40,269,000
Total liabilities		$	5,251,000			$	698,000			$	862,000			$	943,000			$	1,134,000
Members’ capital		$	25,034,000			$	28,541,000			$	33,539,000			$	37,887,000			$	39,135,000

ITEM 7.		MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The following “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” should be read in conjunction with our audited financial statements and notes thereto as well as the Section “Properties” contained elsewhere in this report. See also the “Special Note about Forward-looking Statements” preceding Item 1 of this report.

Critical Accounting Policies

Our financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”). The preparation of these financial statements requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities as of the date of the financial statements and the reported amount of revenue and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ materially from the estimates.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities as of the date of the financial statements and the reported amount of revenue and expenses during the reporting periods. Actual results could differ materially from the estimates in the near term.

Revenue Recognition and Valuation of Receivables

Revenue is recorded in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codifcation (“ASC”) 840-10, “Leases”, and SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 104, “Revenue Recognition in Financial Statements, as amended” (“SAB 104”). Revenue is recognized when four basic criteria are met: persuasive evidence of an arrangement, the rendering of service, fixed and determinable income and reasonably assured collectability. Leases with fixed annual rental escalators are generally recognized on a straight-line basis over the initial lease period, subject to a collectability assessment. Rental income related to leases with contingent rental escalators is generally recorded based on the contractual cash rental payments due for the period. Because the Fund’s leases may provide for free rent, lease incentives, or other rental increases at specified intervals, the Fund straight-line the recognition of revenue, which results in the recording of a receivable for rent not yet due under the lease terms. The Fund’s revenues are comprised largely of rental income and other income collected from tenants. Management is required to determine, in its judgment, to what extent the unbilled rent receivable applicable to each specific tenant is collectible. Management reviews unbilled rent receivable on a quarterly basis and takes into consideration the tenant’s payment history, the financial condition of the tenant, business conditions in the industry in which the tenant operates and economic conditions in the area in which the property is located. In the event that the collectability of unbilled rent with respect to any given tenant is in doubt, the Fund records an increase in its allowance for doubtful accounts or records a direct write-off of the specific rent receivable.

Investments in Real Estate

Upon acquisition of a property, we allocate the purchase price of the property based upon the fair value of the assets acquired, which generally consist of land, buildings, site improvements and intangible lease assets or liabilities including in-place leases, above market and below market leases. We allocated the purchase price to the fair value of the tangible assets of an acquired property by valuing the property as if it were vacant. The value of the building is depreciated over an estimated useful life of 39 years.

In-place lease values are calculated based on management’s evaluation of the specific characteristics of each tenant’s lease. The value of in-place lease intangibles, which are included as a component of investments in real estate, is amortized to expense over the average expected lease term.

Acquired above and below market leases is valued based on the present value of the difference between prevailing market rates and the in-place rates over the remaining lease term. The value of acquired above and below market leases is amortized over the remaining non-cancelable terms of the respective leases as an adjustment to rental revenue on our statements of operations.

We consider any bargain periods in our calculation of fair value of below-market leases and to amortize our below-market leases over the remaining non-cancelable lease term plus any bargain renewal periods in accordance with FASB ASC 840-20-20, as determined by us at the time we acquire real property with an in-place lease. The renewal option rates for our acquired leases do not include any fixed rate options and, instead, contain renewal options that are based on fair value terms at the time of renewal. Accordingly, no fixed rate renewal options were included in the fair value of below-market leases acquired and the amortization period is based on the acquired non-cancelable lease term.

Impairment of Real Estate Assets

Rental properties and intangibles are individually evaluated for impairment when conditions exist which may indicate that it is probable that the sum of expected future undiscounted cash flows is less than the carrying amount. Impairment indicators for our rental properties are assessed by project and include, but is not limited to, significant fluctuations in estimated net operating income, occupancy changes, rental rates and other market factors. We assess the expected undiscounted cash flows based upon numerous factors, including, but not limited to, appropriate capitalization rates, available market information, historical operating results, known trends and market/economic conditions that may affect the property and our assumptions about the use of the asset, including, if necessary, a probability-weighted approach if multiple outcomes are under consideration. Upon determination that impairment has occurred and that the future undiscounted cash flows are less than the carrying amount, a write-down will be recorded to reduce the carrying amount to its estimated fair value.

Investment in Real Estate Held-for-Sale

We evaluate the held-for-sale classification of our owned real estate each quarter. Assets that are classified as held-for-sale are recorded at the lower of their carrying amount or fair value less cost to sell. Assets are generally classified as held-for-sale once management commits to a plan to sell the properties and has initiated an active program to market them for sale. The results of operations of these real estate properties are reflected as discontinued operations in all periods reported. At December 31, 2010, one real estate asset was classified as held for sale.

Commitments and Contingencies

We monitor our properties for the presence of hazardous or toxic substances. While there can be no assurance that a material environmental liability does not exist, we are not currently aware of any environmental liability with respect to the properties that would have a material effect on our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows. Further, we are not aware of any environmental liability or any unasserted claim or assessment with respect to an environmental liability that we believe would require additional disclosure or the recording of a loss contingency.

Our commitments and contingencies include the usual obligations of real estate owners and operators in the normal course of business. In the opinion of management, these matters are not expected to have a material impact on our financial position, cash flows and results of operations. We are not presently subject to any material litigation nor, to our knowledge, any material litigation threatened against the Fund which if determined unfavorably to us would have a material adverse effect on our cash flows, financial condition or results of operations.

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

Reference is made to Notes to our Financial Statements, which begin on page F-1 to F-17 of this Form 10-K.

Results of Operations

Overview

We were formed in October of 1998 to invest in multi-tenant business parks catering to small business tenants. Our properties are located in major metropolitan areas in the United States and were purchased on an all cash basis without debt financing. Our revenues consist primarily of rental income from our properties and additional rent in the form of expense reimbursements derived from our income producing properties. Our properties are located in Los Angeles, California, Chicago, Illinois and Phoenix, Arizona.

Market Outlook — Real Estate and Real Estate Finance Markets

During 2010, significant and widespread concerns about credit risk and access to capital experienced during 2009 began to subside. Concerns of a double-dip recession have diminished as a number of economic indicators have improved. Increased trade volume in 2010 spurred increased leasing activity in many west coast industrial markets. However, if the economic uncertainty persists, we may experience significant vacancies or be required to reduce rental rates on occupied space.

Despite recent positive economic indicators, both the national and most global economies have experienced continued volatility throughout 2010. The aforementioned conditions, combined with stagnant business activity and low consumer confidence, have resulted in a challenging operating environment.

As a result of the decline in general economic conditions, the U.S. commercial real estate industry has also been experiencing deteriorating fundamentals across all major property types and most geographic markets. These market conditions have and will likely continue to have a significant impact on our real estate investments. In addition, these market conditions have impacted our tenants’ businesses, which makes it more difficult for them to meet current lease obligations and places pressure on them to negotiate favorable lease terms upon renewal in order for their businesses to remain viable. Increases in rental concessions given to retain tenants and maintain our occupancy level, which is vital to the continued success of our portfolio, has resulted in lower current cash flow. Projected future declines in rental rates, slower or potentially negative net absorption of leased space and expectations of future rental concessions, including free rent to retain tenants who are up for renewal or to sign new tenants, are expected to result in additional decreases in cash flows.

Results of Operations

Results of continuing operations for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009 comprise five multi-tenant industrial business park properties in two major metropolitan areas. On March 1, 2010, we determined that the potential sale of Zenith Drive Centre to a third party was probable and classified the property as held for sale. We have included all operating results of the Zenith Drive Centre in a separate component of income on the Statements of Operations under the heading income (loss) from discontinued operations for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009.

The results of continuing operations for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009 are discussed below.

Year Ended December 31, 2010 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2009

Rental revenues decreased to $2.4 million in 2010 from $2.7 million in 2009 primarily due to longer lease up periods of vacant units, lower market lease rates and higher concessions to attract and retain tenants as a result of the competitive market conditions partially offset by existing tenant leases with rent escalations. Tenant reimbursements and other income were comparable for years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009.

Property operating and maintenance expense increased to $0.8 million in 2010 from $0.7 million in 2009. The increase is primarily due to higher bad debt expense and unit refurbishment repairs.

Property tax expense is comparable for years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009.

General and administrative expenses increased to $0.4 million in 2010 from $0.3 million in 2009 due primarily to increases in insurance expense and audit, tax and other professional service fees.

Depreciation and amortization decreased to under $0.8 million in 2010 from above $0.8 million in 2009. The decrease is due to real estate impairment losses recognized during the years ended December 31, 2009 and in 2010 which reduces depreciable basis and full amortization of intangible assets at three properties.

Impairment of real estate increased to approximately $2.1 million in 2010 from $1.9 million in 2009 due to impairment charges recorded to reflect a decline in the market value of our real estate properties.

Interest and other income is comparable for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009.

Interest expense increased to $24,000 from $0 for the same period of 2009 due to borrowing under the loan agreement entered into in the fourth quarter of 2010.

Discontinued Operations

During the first quarter of 2010, we determined that the potential sale of Zenith Drive Centre to a third party was probable and classified the property as held for sale in accordance with ASC 360-10, Property, Plant and Equipment. For the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, net income from discontinued operations increased to approximately $0.2 million from a net loss of $1.2 million for the comparable period of 2009. The increase is primarily due to an impairment charge of $1.2 million recognized during the third quarter of 2009, reducing depreciable basis, and the full amortization of intangible assets of the property.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

As of December 31, 2010, we had approximately $4.4 million in cash and cash equivalents. We intend to use the existing cash balance for capital improvements to the properties and to provide for operating reserves. Cash in excess of these needs, if any, will be available for distribution to unit holders and to repurchase units from unit holders.

Effective April 27, 2010, our operating agreement was amended to allow the managing member to cause us to incur debt financing, not to exceed ten percent of the capital contributions of all unit holders, to meet our operating expenses or to fund cash distributions declared and paid to members. On December 2, 2010, we entered into a $4.0 million secured loan to provide liquidity for these purposes. To the extent that net cash generated by the properties is not sufficient to meet operating costs and pay cash distributions to our unit holders, we will endeavor to sell selected properties so that we can continue to operate the remaining properties and pay cash distributions.

We intend to hold the properties in which we have invested until we determine that selling or otherwise disposing of properties would help us to achieve our investment objectives. General economic conditions, availability of financing, interest rates and other factors, including supply and demand, all of which are beyond our control, affect the real estate market.

Debt Service Requirements

On December 2, 2010, we entered into a $4.0 million loan agreement with Farmers & Merchants Bank of Long Beach. The loan matures on November 19, 2013 with no option to extend and bears interest at a fixed rate of 5.75% per annum. The terms of the loan require monthly payments of principal and interest. The remaining loan balance is payable on the maturity date. We may repay the loan, in whole or in part, on or before November 19, 2013 without any penalty.

Contractual Obligations

The following table reflects our contractual obligations as December 31, 2010:

		Payment due by period
						Less than												More than
Contractual Obligations		Total				1 year				1-3 years				3-5 years				5 years
Notes payable (1)		$	3,987,000			$	52,000			$	3,935,000			$	—			$	—
Interest expense related to long term debt (2)		$	666,000			$	231,000			$	435,000			$	—			$	—

Off-balance Sheet Financings and Liabilities

Other than lease commitments and legal contingencies incurred in the normal course of business, we do not have any off-balance sheet financing arrangements or liabilities. We do not have any majority-owned subsidiaries or any interests in, or relationships with, any special-purpose entities.

ITEM 7A.		QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

Market risk includes risks that arise from changes in interest rates, foreign currency exchange rates, commodity prices, equity prices and other market changes that affect market sensitive instruments. We invest our cash and cash equivalents in government backed securities and FDIC insured savings account which, by its nature, are subject to interest rate fluctuations. As of December 31, 2010, a 1% increase or decrease in interest rates would not have a material effect on our interest income.

In addition to changes in interest rates, the value of our real estate is subject to fluctuations based on changes in the real estate capital markets, market rental rates for office space, local, regional and national economic conditions and changes in the credit worthiness of tenants. All of these factors may also affect our ability to refinance our debt if necessary.

ITEM 8.		FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

Our financial statements, related notes and supplemental schedules are contained on pages F-1 to F-17 of this report. The index to such items is included in Item 15(a).

ITEM 9.		CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

Not applicable.

ITEM 9A.		CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

We maintain disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the reports we file or submit under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our senior management, including our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. Our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer have reviewed the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures and have concluded that the disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of the end of the period covered by this report.

In designing and evaluating the disclosure controls and procedures, management recognizes that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives, and management is required to apply its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures.

Our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer are responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934. Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, we conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting based on the framework in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Based on their evaluation as of the end of the period covered by this report, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that we maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2010.

There have been no changes in our internal control over financial reporting during our most recent fiscal quarter that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

This annual report does not include an attestation report of the Fund’s independent registered public accounting firm regarding control over financial reporting. Management’s report was not subject to attestation by the Fund’s independent registered public accounting firm pursuant to the Dodd-Frank Wall Street and Consumer Protection Act, which exempts smaller reporting companies from the auditor attestation requirement of Section 404 (b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act.

ITEM 9B.		OTHER INFORMATION

Not applicable.

PART III

ITEM 10.		DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Cornerstone Industrial Properties, LLC is a California limited liability company, which was initially organized for the purpose of being our managing member. Our managing member is owned by Cornerstone Ventures, Inc. as well as various investors which do not have any voting rights or control with respect to the operations of our managing member.

Our managing member also acts as the manager of another investment fund and is a preferred shareholder of Pacific Cornerstone Capital, Inc., our Managing Broker/Dealer. The manager of our managing member is Cornerstone Ventures, Inc. Cornerstone Ventures, Inc. oversees the activities of our managing member and provides many of the services necessary for our managing member to fulfill its responsibilities to us. The Cornerstone Ventures, Inc. team of professionals brings together a unique blend of talent and experience. As of March 17, 2011, Cornerstone Ventures, Inc. was the owner of 26.4% of the equity profits interest in our managing member and has sole voting control with respect to our operations.

Board of Directors of Manager of Managing Member

Terry G. Roussel, age 57, is one of the founding shareholders of the Cornerstone-related entities that commenced operations in 1989. Mr. Roussel is Chief Executive Officer, a Director and the majority shareholder of Cornerstone Ventures, Inc., the manager of our managing member of the Fund. Mr. Roussel is also the President, Chief Executive Officer and a Director of Cornerstone Core Properties REIT and Cornerstone Healthcare PLUS REIT, Inc. and their advisors, Cornerstone Realty Advisors, LLC and Cornerstone Leveraged Realty Advisors, LLC, respectively and the majority shareholder of Pacific Cornerstone Capital, Inc. Under Mr. Roussel’s direction, Cornerstone Ventures and its affiliates formed nine separate real estate investment funds and joint ventures. In 1993, Cornerstone and its affiliates became managing joint venture partner with Koll Capital Markets Group, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of Koll Management Services, Inc. (now owned by CB Richard Ellis).

On December 11, 2009, Mr. Roussel and Pacific Cornerstone Capital, Inc. entered into a Letter of Acceptance, Waiver and Consent (AWC) with the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) relating to alleged rule violations. The AWC set forth FINRA’s findings that Pacific Cornerstone Capital and Mr. Roussel had violated conduct rules in connection with private placements conducted by Pacific Cornerstone Capital during the period from January 1, 2004 through May 30, 2009. Without admitting or denying the allegations and findings against them, Pacific Cornerstone Capital and Mr. Roussel consented in the AWC to various findings by FINRA, which allege that they violated NASD and FINRA rules relating to communications with the public (NASD Rule 2210); supervision (NASD Rule 3010), and standards of commercial honor and principles of trade (FINRA Rule 2010, formerly NASD Rule 2110). FINRA’s allegations, in sum, focus on claimed material misstatements and omissions with respect to certain performance targets used in connection with the private placements. Pacific Cornerstone Capital consented to a censure and fine of $700,000. Mr. Roussel consented to a fine of $50,000, suspension from association with a FINRA member in all capacities for 20 business days, and suspension from association with a FINRA member firm in a principal capacity for an additional three months.

As managing partner of the above-described funds and joint ventures, Cornerstone Ventures, Inc. and its affiliates were responsible for the acquisition, operation, leasing, and disposition of all jointly owned properties between Koll and Cornerstone. In connection with acquiring properties for the account of these joint ventures, Mr. Roussel personally supervised the acquisition of each property, initiated and directed the business plan for each property, and arranged debt and equity financing the acquisition of each property.

In addition to his real estate experience, Mr. Roussel gained valuable financial services industry experience earlier in his career. In 1985, Mr. Roussel started the Special Investments Group, a new division within Bank of America’s Capital Markets Group, which provided real estate investment opportunities to the bank’s wealthiest private banking clients. Between 1980 and 1985, Mr. Roussel was employed by Bateman Eichler, Hill Richards, Inc., a regional securities firm headquartered in Los Angeles, California. In this capacity, Mr. Roussel was promoted to First Vice President and Manager of the partnership finance department where he was responsible for the due diligence and marketing of all publicly registered and real estate funds offered by the firm. Mr. Roussel graduated with honors from California State University at Fullerton in 1976 with a B.A. in Business Administration with a concentration in Accounting. Subsequent to graduation, Mr. Roussel joined the accounting firm of Arthur Andersen & Co. as an auditor and later transferred to the tax department of Arthur Young & Co., a predecessor firm to Ernst & Young. Mr. Roussel became a Certified Public Accountant in 1979 (now inactive).

Alfred J. Pizzurro, age 54, is a Director and shareholder of Cornerstone Ventures, Inc. as well as a shareholder of Pacific Cornerstone Capital, Inc., the dealer manager for the Cornerstone Realty Fund, LLC offering that closed in August of 2005. Mr. Pizzurro joined Cornerstone Ventures, Inc. in April 1998 and has been the individual primarily responsible for Cornerstone’s marketing and new business development activities since that time.

Between 1993 and 1998, Mr. Pizzurro was responsible for business development both domestically and internationally for The Joseph Company, a research and development company. From 1986 to 1992, he was the Director of Marketing for a regional real estate company. Mr. Pizzurro served as a pilot in the United States Marine Corps between 1979 and 1986 where he attained the rank of Captain.

Mr. Pizzurro received his Bachelor of Science Degree in Communications from Clarion University in 1978.

Financial Oversight Committee

We do not have a board of directors or an audit committee. Accordingly, as the managing member of our manager, Cornerstone Ventures, Inc. has established a Financial Oversight Committee consisting of Terry G. Roussel, as the Principal Executive Officer and Sharon C. Kaiser, as the Principal Financial Officer of Cornerstone Ventures, Inc. The Financial Oversight Committee will serve the equivalent function of an audit committee for, among others, the following purposes: appointment, compensation, review and oversight of the work of our independent registered public accounting firm, and establishing and enforcing our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics. The Financial Oversight Committee is not independent of us or the managing member.

Management of the Managing Member

Mr. Roussel is the Chief Executive Officer of Cornerstone Ventures, Inc. The remaining executive officer of Cornerstone Ventures, Inc. is Sharon C. Kaiser. The experience of Mr. Roussel is described above under “Board of Directors of Manager of Managing Member.” Ms. Kaiser’s experience is described below.

Sharon C. Kaiser, age 66, has served as the Chief Financial Officer of Cornerstone Ventures, Inc. since October 2005. Ms. Kaiser joined Cornerstone in July 2005 as Chief Financial Officer of Cornerstone Core Properties REIT, Inc. and its advisor, Cornerstone Realty Advisors, LLC. Ms. Kaiser is responsible for finance and accounting.

Prior to joining Cornerstone, Ms. Kaiser was Director of Financial Operations for Westfield America, Inc.

From 1999 to 2002, Ms. Kaiser served as Chief Financial Officer of The StayWell Company, a subsidiary of Vivendi Universal, and from 1995 to 1999, where she served as Chief Financial Officer and Senior Vice President of HemaCare Corporation, a publicly traded biomedical company. Her responsibilities included financial accounting and reporting, information technology, investor relations and human resources, as well as strategic planning and acquisition due diligence and integration.

Before joining HemaCare Corporation, Ms. Kaiser served as the Chief Financial Officer of a publicly traded (AMEX) REIT sponsored by the Koll Company. Earlier she spent eight years with Arthur Andersen and Co.

Ms. Kaiser holds a Bachelor of Science in Business Administration from the University of Southern California and has been a Certified Public Accountant since 1981.

Compensation

We reimburse our managing member for its direct expenses in administering our business and pay our managing member compensation for its services as provided in the operating agreement. Our managing member is also entitled to receive a percentage of net cash flow from operations and net sales proceeds, both as defined in our operating agreement. See Item 13 for a discussion of the fees we pay to our managing member and its affiliates.

Services Performed by Others

Our managing member and its affiliates outsource certain functions and intend to continue hiring independent persons and companies to provide services to us as called for by the operating agreement or which, in the opinion of our managing member, would be in our best interests. We will pay the cost of all such services unless those services are to be provided by our managing member.

Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting

Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, requires our managers and persons who beneficially own more than 10% of a registered class of our equity securities to file reports of securities ownership and changes in such ownership with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”). Managers and greater than 10% beneficial owners are also required by rules promulgated by the SEC to furnish the Fund with copies of all Section 16(a) forms they file.

During the period from January 1, 2010 through December 31, 2010, there were no Section 16(a) filings required.

Code of Business Conduct and Ethics

Cornerstone Ventures, Inc. has adopted a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics that applies to all of its officers and directors, including Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer. The Code of Business Conduct and Ethics can be found on http://www.crefunds.com.

ITEM 11.		COMPENSATION OF OUR MANAGING MEMBER AND AFFILIATES

We do not have executive officers or directors. We did not pay compensation to the executive officers of our managing member’s managing member for services rendered to us. See Item 13 for a discussion of the fees paid to and services provided by our managing member and its affiliates

ITEM 12.		SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED MEMBER MATTERS

There are no units of membership interest owned by our managing member as of December 31, 2010. There are five units of membership interest owned by Terry G. Roussel as of December 31, 2010 which represents less than 1% of the units outstanding.

No arrangements exist which would, upon implementation, result in a change in control of the Company.

We do not have any equity compensation plans and did not have any such plan as of December 31, 2010.

ITEM 13.		CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS

Compensation and Fees to be paid to our Managing Member and its Affiliates

Following is a summary of the compensation and fees paid by us to our managing member and its affiliates in connection with the operation of the company and the liquidation of our properties for the year ended December 31, 2010.

Type of Compensation
and Recipient		Method of Compensation		Amount
		OPERATIONAL STAGE
Property management fees payable to our managing member and/or its affiliates some or all of which may be paid to unaffiliated third parties		Property management fees equal to 6% of the gross rental income generated by each property will be paid monthly		$	—
Property refurbishment supervision fee payable to our managing member and/or its affiliates some or all of which may be paid to unaffiliated third parties		Property refurbishment supervision fee equal to 10% of the cost of tenant improvements or capital improvements made to our properties		$	—
Leasing commissions payable to our managing member and/or its affiliates some or all of which may be paid to unaffiliated third parties		Leasing commissions paid upon execution of each lease equal to 6% of rent scheduled to be paid during the first and second year of the lease, 5% during the third and fourth years and 4% during the fifth and later years		$	—
Incentive share of net cash flow from operations payable to our managing member		10% of net cash flow from operations each year until unit holders have received distributions equal to an 8% per annum, simple return for the year or the early investors 12% incentive return, then 50% of net cash flow from operations		$	107,000
Reimbursement of actual cost of goods, materials and other services supplied to us by our managing member		Reimbursement of actual expenses and costs		$	—

Type of Compensation
and Recipient		Method of Compensation		Amount
		LIQUIDATION STAGE
Property disposition fees payable to our managing member and/or its affiliates some or all of which may be paid to unaffiliated third parties. Our managing member will not be given an exclusive right to sell our properties		Property disposition fees in an amount equal to 6% of the contract sales price of the property		$	—
Incentive share of net sales proceeds payable to our managing member		After the unit holders have received an amount equal to their aggregate capital contributions, 10% of proceeds from property sales until the unit holders have received an amount equal to an aggregate 8% per annum, cumulative, non-compounded return taking into account all prior distributions and thereafter 50% of proceeds from property sales		$	—

Director Independence

We are a limited liability company, not a corporation, and are therefore managed by our managing member, Cornerstone Industrial Properties LLC, rather than by a board of directors. Our managing member is managed by Cornerstone Ventures, Inc., which has a board of directors comprised of two directors, Terry G. Roussel and Alfred J. Pizzurro. Since our securities are not listed on a national securities exchange or an inter-dealer quotation system, we are not subject to the director independence standards that are applicable to listed entities. Neither Mr. Roussel nor Mr. Pizzurro would be considered independent as defined in the rules applicable to listed entities.

ITEM 14.		PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES

BDO Seidman, LLP was our independent registered public accounting firm from January 1, 2006 to June 30, 2009. Commencing with the third quarter of 2009, Deloitte & Touche LLP became our independent registered public accounting firm.

Audit and Non-Audit Fees

Aggregate fees for professional services rendered to us by BDO Seidman, LLP and Deloitte & Touche, LLP for the years ending December 31, 2010 and 2009 were as follows:

		Deloitte & Touche								BDO Seidman
Services Provided		2010				2009				2010				2009
Audit Fees		$	152,000			$	74,000			$	25,000			$	38,000
All Other Fees			4,000				—				—				—
Total		$	156,000			$	74,000			$	25,000			$	38,000

Audit Fees. The aggregate fees billed for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009 were for the audits of our financial statements and reviews of our interim financial statements included in our annual and quarterly reports.

All Other Fees. The aggregate fees billed for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009 were for expense related to the audits of our financial statements and reviews of our interim financial statements included in our annual and quarterly reports.

Pre-Approval Policies and Procedures

The Financial Oversight Committee has implemented pre-approval policies and procedures related to the provision of audit and non-audit services. Under these procedures, the Financial Oversight Committee pre-approves both the type of services to be provided by its auditor and the estimated fees related to these services.

During the approval process, the Financial Oversight Committee considers the impact of the types of services and the related fees on the independence of the auditor. The services and fees must be deemed compatible with the maintenance of the auditor’s independence, including compliance with SEC rules and regulations. Throughout the year, the Financial Oversight Committee will review any revisions to the estimates of audit and non-audit fees initially approved.

PART IV

ITEM 15.		EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES

(a)(1)

Financial Statements

The following financial statements are included in a separate section of this Annual Report on Form 10-K commencing on the page numbers specified below:
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2010 and 2009
Statements of Operations for the Years Ended December 31, 2010 and 2009
Statements of Members’ Capital for the Years Ended December 31, 2010 and 2009
Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended December 31, 2010 and, 2009
Notes to Financial Statements

(a)(2)		Financial Statement Schedules
		Schedule II — Valuation and Qualifying Accounts Schedule III — Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation

(a)(3)

Exhibits

	3.1		Articles of Organization (incorporated by reference to Registration Statement on Form S-11, File No. 333-76609, filed April 20, 1999).
	3.2		Amended and Restated Operating Agreement dated as of June 30, 2003, as amended by Amendment No. 1 dated as of February 22, 2007, Amendment No. 2 dated as of June 2, 2009 and Amendment No. 3 dated as of April 27, 2010 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on May 14, 2010.)
	3.3		Amendment to Articles of Organization filed August 18, 1999 (incorporated by reference to Pre-Effective Amendment No. 1 to Registration Statement on Form S-11, File No. 333-76609, filed February 4, 2000).
	3.4		Amendment to Articles of Organization of the Fund filed January 26, 2000 (incorporated by reference to Pre-Effective Amendment No. 1 to Registration Statement on Form S-11, File No. 333-76609, filed February 4, 2000).
	10.1		Loan Agreement by and between Farmers & Merchants Bank of Long Beach, a California corporation and Cornerstone Realty Fund, LLC, dated as of November 19, 2010.
	14.1		Code of Business Conduct and Ethics (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 14.1 to the Registrant’s Form 10-K filed on March 29, 2006)
	31.1		Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
	31.2		Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
	32		Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this annual report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized this 17th day of March 2011.

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the following person on behalf of the registrant has signed this report below in the capacity as and on the date indicated.

Signature		Title		Date
/s/ Terry G. Roussel   Terry G. Roussel		Director of Cornerstone Ventures, Inc.		March 17, 2011
/s/ Alfred J. Pizzurro   Alfred J. Pizzurro		Director of Cornerstone Ventures, Inc.		March 17, 2011

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

CORNERSTONE REALTY FUND, LLC

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm			F-2
Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2010 and 2009			F-3
Statements of Operations for the Years Ended December 31, 2010 and 2009			F-4
Statements of Members’ Capital for the Years Ended December 31, 2010 and 2009			F-5
Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended December 31, 2010 and 2009			F-6
Notes to Financial Statements			F-7

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Members
Cornerstone Realty Fund, LLC
Irvine, California

We have audited the accompanying balance sheet of Cornerstone Realty Fund, LLC, (the “Fund”) a California limited liability company, as of December 31, 2010 and 2009 and the related statements of operations, members’ capital and cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2010 and 2009. Our audit also included financial statement schedules for the year ended December 31, 2010 and 2009 listed in the Index at Item 15. These financial statements and schedules are the responsibility of the Fund’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and schedules based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Fund is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audit included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Fund’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Cornerstone Realty Fund, LLC as of December 31, 2010 and 2009 and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Also, in our opinion, the financial statement schedules, when considered in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole, present fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein.

As described in Note 9 to the financial statements, subsequent to the year ended December 31, 2010, management of the Fund have taken steps, including holding the Fund’s full portfolio of real estate assets for sale, that may result in liquidation of the Fund in advance of the Fund’s scheduled dissolution date of December 31, 2012.

CORNERSTONE REALTY FUND, LLC
(a California limited liability company)
BALANCE SHEETS

		December 31,
		2010				2009
ASSETS
Assets
Cash and cash equivalents		$	4,356,000			$	761,000
Investments in real estate
Land			9,238,000				10,088,000
Buildings and improvements value, net			14,387,000				16,110,000
Intangible asset — in-place leases, net			—				9,000
Property held for sale, net			1,721,000				1,726,000
			25,346,000				27,933,000
Other assets
Non-real estate assets associated with property held for sale			81,000				74,000
Tenant and other receivables, less allowance of $298,000 in 2010 and $190,000 in 2009			245,000				263,000
Prepaid expenses			16,000				50,000
Deferred financing cost, net			77,000				—
Leasing commissions, net			164,000				158,000
Total assets		$	30,285,000			$	29,239,000
LIABILITIES AND MEMBERS’ CAPITAL
Liabilities
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities		$	122,000			$	161,000
Distributions payable			622,000				—
Real estate taxes payable			82,000				76,000
Tenant security deposits			189,000				194,000
Note payable			3,987,000				—
Intangible lease liability, net			—				5,000
Liabilities associated with property held for sale			249,000				262,000
Total liabilities			5,251,000				698,000
Commitments and contingencies (Note 6)
Members’ capital (100,000 units authorized and issued at 2010 and 2009; 98,670 and 98,814 units outstanding at 2010 and 2009, respectively)			25,034,000				28,541,000
Total liabilities and members’ capital		$	30,285,000			$	29,239,000

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

CORNERSTONE REALTY FUND, LLC
(a California limited liability company)
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

		Years Ended
		December 31,
		2010				2009
Revenues:
Rental revenues		$	2,356,000			$	2,657,000
Tenant reimbursements and other income			490,000				494,000
			2,846,000				3,151,000
Expenses:
Property operating and maintenance			793,000				715,000
Property taxes			459,000				440,000
General and administrative expenses			390,000				251,000
Depreciation and amortization			781,000				831,000
Impairment of real estate			2,093,000				1,880,000
			4,516,000				4,117,000
Interest (income and other)			(1,000	)			(1,000	)
Interest expense			24,000				—
Loss from continuing operations			(1,693,000	)			(965,000	)
Discontinued operation:
Income (loss) from discontinued operations			208,000				(1,176,000	)
			208,000				(1,176,000	)
Net loss		$	(1,485,000	)		$	(2,141,000	)
Net loss allocable to managing member		$	(148,000	)		$	(214,000	)
Net (loss) income allocable to unit holders:
From continuing operations		$	(1,524,000	)		$	(869,000	)
From discontinued operations			187,000				(1,058,000	)
		$	(1,337,000	)		$	(1,927,000	)
Per unit amounts:
Basic and diluted loss from continuing operation allocable to unit holders		$	(15.44	)		$	(8.76	)
Basic and diluted income (loss) from discontinued operations allocable to unit holders		$	1.89			$	(10.66	)
Basic and diluted weighted average units outstanding			98,713				99,218

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

CORNERSTONE REALTY FUND, LLC
(a California limited liability company)

STATEMENTS OF MEMBERS’ CAPITAL

Balance, December 31, 2008		$	33,539,000
Cash distributions to unit holders			(2,479,000	)
Cash distributions to managing member			(192,000	)
Units repurchased and retired			(186,000	)
Net loss			(2,141,000	)
Balance, December 31, 2009		$	28,541,000
Distributions to unit holders			(1,866,000	)
Distributions to managing member			(107,000	)
Units repurchased and retired			(49,000	)
Net loss			(1,485,000	)
Balance, December 31, 2010		$	25,034,000

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

CORNERSTONE REALTY FUND, LLC
(a California limited liability company)
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

		Years Ended
		December 31,
		2010				2009
OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Net loss		$	(1,485,000	)		$	(2,141,000	)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by operating activities:
Amortization of deferred financing costs			5,000				—
Depreciation and amortization			797,000				947,000
Provision for bad debts			148,000				107,000
Impairment of real estate			2,093,000				3,096,000
Straight-line rent and amortization of acquired above/below market leases			(28,000	)			(30,000	)
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Other assets, net			(200,000	)			(292,000	)
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities			(67,000	)			(124,000	)
Real estate taxes payable			(2,000	)			14,000
Tenant security deposits			(3,000	)			(39,000	)
Net cash provided by operating activities			1,258,000				1,538,000
INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Additions to real estate			(169,000	)			(209,000	)
Net cash used in investing activities			(169,000	)			(209,000	)
FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Proceeds from note payable			4,000,000				—
Repayment of note payable			(13,000	)			—
Cash distributions to unit holders			(1,244,000	)			(2,479,000	)
Cash distributions to managing member			(107,000	)			(192,000	)
Units repurchased and retired			(49,000	)			(186,000	)
Deferred financing costs			(81,000	)			—
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities			2,506,000				(2,857,000	)
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents			3,595,000				(1,528,000	)
Cash and cash equivalents — beginning of year			761,000				2,289,000
Cash and cash equivalents — end of year		$	4,356,000			$	761,000
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:
Cash paid for interest		$	11,000				—
Supplemental disclosure of non-cash financing and investing activities:
Distribution declared not paid		$	622,000				—
Accrued real estate additions		$	21,000			$	12,000

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

CORNERSTONE REALTY FUND, LLC
(a California limited liability company)

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

1. Organization and Business

Cornerstone Realty Fund, LLC, a California limited liability company (the “Fund”), was formed on October 28, 1998. The members of the Fund are Cornerstone Industrial Properties, LLC, a California limited liability company (“CIP”), as the Managing Member (“Managing Member”), Terry G. Roussel, an individual, and other various unit holders as described below. The purpose of the Fund is to acquire, operate and sell multi-tenant industrial properties.

The operating agreement, as amended and restated, provides, among other things, for the following:

	•		CIP generally has complete and exclusive discretion in the management and control of our operations; however, unit holders holding the majority of all outstanding and issued units have certain specified voting rights which include the removal and replacement of the Managing Member.
	•		Net Cash Flow from Operations, as defined, will be distributed 90% to the unit holders and 10% to the Managing Member until the unit holders have received either an 8% or 12% cumulative, non-compounded annual return on their invested capital contributions, as defined. The 12% return applies to specified early investors for the twelve-month period subsequent to the date of their invested capital contributions and is in lieu of the 8% return during that period.
	•		Net Sales Proceeds, as defined, will be distributed first, 100% to the unit holders in an amount equal to their Invested Capital Contributions; then, 90% to the unit holders and 10% to the Managing Member until the unit holders have received an amount equal to the unpaid balance of their aggregate cumulative, non-compounded annual return on their invested capital contributions; and thereafter, 50% to the unit holders and 50% to the Managing Member.
	•		Net Income, as defined, is allocated first, 10% to the Managing Member and 90% to the unit holders until net income allocated equals cumulative net losses, as defined, previously allocated in such proportions; second, in proportion to and to the extent of net cash flow from operations and net sales proceeds previously distributed to the members, exclusive of distributions representing a return of invested capital contributions; and then 50% to the Managing Member and 50% to the unit holders.
	•		Net Loss is allocated first, 50% to the Managing Member and 50% to the unit holders, until net loss allocated equals cumulative net income previously allocated in such proportions; then remaining net loss is allocated 10% to the Managing Member and 90% to the unit holders.
	•		All allocations and distributions to the unit holders are to be pro rata in proportion to their ownership shares.
	•		Effective February 22, 2007, the Fund’s operating agreement was amended to permit repurchase of units on such terms and conditions as the Managing Member may determine.
	•		Effective June 2, 2009, the Fund’s operating agreement was amended and the dissolution date was extended from December 31, 2010 to December 31, 2012.
	•		Effective April 27, 2010, our operating agreement was amended and allows the Managing Member to cause us to incur debt financing not to exceed ten percent of the capital contributions of all unit holders to meet the Fund’s operating expenses or to fund cash distributions declared and paid to members.

2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

The summary of significant accounting policies presented below is designed to assist in understanding the financial statements. Such financial statements and accompanying notes are the representations of management, who is responsible for their integrity and objectivity. These accounting policies conform to accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, or GAAP, in all material respects, and have been consistently applied in preparing the accompanying financial statements.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities as of the date of the financial statements and the reported amount of revenue and expenses during the reporting periods. Actual results could differ materially from the estimates in the near term.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

We consider all short-term, highly liquid investments that are readily convertible to cash with a maturity of three months or less at the time of purchase to be cash equivalents.

Investments in Real Estate

Upon acquisition of a property, the Fund allocates the purchase price of the property based upon the fair value of the assets acquired, which generally consist of land, buildings, site improvements and intangible lease assets or liabilities including in-place leases and above market and below market leases. The Fund allocated the purchase price to the fair value of the tangible assets of an acquired property by valuing the property as if it were vacant. The value of the building is depreciated over an estimated useful life of 39 years.

In-place lease values are calculated based on management’s evaluation of the specific characteristics of each tenant’s lease. The value of in-place lease intangibles, which are included as a component of investments in real estate, is amortized to expense over the average expected lease term.

Acquired above and below market leases is valued based on the present value of the difference between prevailing market rates and the in-place rates over the remaining lease term. The value of acquired above and below market leases is amortized over the remaining non-cancelable terms, including bargain renewal periods, of the respective leases as an adjustment to rental revenue on the Fund’s statements of operations.

In accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standard Codification (“ASC”) 360 “Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-lived Assets”, the Fund assesses whether there has been impairment in the value of its investments in real estate whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. Its portfolio is evaluated for impairment on a property-by-property basis. Indicators of potential impairment include the following:

	•		Change in strategy resulting in a decreased holding period;
	•		Decreased occupancy levels;
	•		Deterioration of the rental market as evidenced by rent decreases over numerous quarters;
	•		Properties adjacent to or located in the same submarket as those with recent impairment issues;
	•		Significant decrease in market price; and/or;
	•		Tenant financial problems.

During 2010, we recorded impairment charges related to two of our investments in real estate totaling approximately $2.1 million. During 2009, we recorded impairment charges related to two of our investments in real estate totaling approximately $3.1 million, of which, $1.2 million was recorded to Zenith Centre Drive. The impairments were primarily driven by reduced estimates of net operating income, primarily due to the impact of declines in the industrial rental market and credit conditions of certain tenants, which when combined with increases in the capitalization rates assumptions, resulted in the decreases in values of such properties.

The assessment as to whether our investments in real estate are impaired is highly subjective. The calculations, which are primarily based on discounted cash flow analyses, involve management’s best estimate of market participants’ holding period, market comparables, future occupancy levels, rental rates, capitalization rates, lease-up periods and capital requirements for each property. A change in any one or more of these factors could materially impact whether a property is impaired as of any given valuation date.

Investments in Real Estate Assets Held-for-Sale

The Fund evaluates the held-for-sale classification of its owned real estate each quarter. Assets that are classified as held-for-sale are recorded at the lower of their carrying amount or fair value less cost to sell and depreciation of the asset ceases. Assets are generally classified as held-for-sale once management commits to a plan to sell the Properties and has initiated an active program to market them for sale. The results of operations of these real estate properties are reflected as discontinued operations in all periods reported. As of December 31, 2010, one of the Fund’s properties, Zenith Drive Centre, was classified as held for sale. The results of operations of Zenith Drive Centre are reflected as discontinued operations in all periods reported. See Note 8 for additional information. As of December 31, 2009 none of the Fund’s properties were classified as held for sale.

Leasing Commissions

Leasing commissions are stated at cost and amortized on a straight-line basis over the related lease term. As of December 31, 2010 and 2009, the Fund had recorded approximately $342,000 and $324,000 in leasing commissions, respectively. The unamortized portion of this asset was approximately $195,000 at December 31, 2010 and $180,000 at December 31, 2009.

Deferred Financing Costs

Costs incurred in connection with debt financing are recorded as deferred financing costs. Deferred financing costs are amortized using the straight-line basis which approximates the effective interest rate method, over the contractual terms of the respective financings.

Revenue Recognition

Revenue is recorded in accordance with FASB ASC 840-10, “Leases”, and SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 104, “Revenue Recognition in Financial Statements, as amended.” Revenue is recognized when four basic criteria are met: persuasive evidence of an arrangement, the rendering of service, fixed and determinable income and reasonably assured collectability. Leases with fixed annual rental escalators are generally recognized on a straight-line basis over the initial lease period, subject to a collectability assessment. Rental income related to leases with contingent rental escalators is generally recorded based on the contractual cash rental payments due for the period. Because the Fund’s leases may provide for free rent, lease incentives, or other rental increases at specified intervals, the Fund recognizes revenue on a straight-line basis, which results in the recording of a receivable for rent not yet due under the lease terms. The Fund’s revenues are comprised largely of rental income and other income collected from tenants. Management is required to determine, in its judgment, to what extent the unbilled rent receivable applicable to each specific tenant is collectible.

Tenants Receivable

Management reviews unbilled rent receivable on a quarterly basis and takes into consideration the tenant’s payment history, the financial condition of the tenant, business conditions in the industry in which the tenant operates and economic conditions in the area in which the property is located. In the event that the collectability of unbilled rent with respect to any given tenant is in doubt, the Fund records an increase in its allowance for doubtful accounts or records a direct write-off of the specific rent receivable. Our allowance for doubtful accounts was $298,000 and $190,000 as of December 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively.

Fair Value Measurement

ASC 820-10, “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures,” defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in GAAP and provides for expanded disclosure about fair value measurements. ASC 820-10 applies prospectively to all other accounting pronouncements that require or permit fair value measurements. The adoption of ASC 820-10 did not have a material impact on the Fund’s financial statements since it does not record its financial assets and liabilities in its financial statements at fair value. The Fund adopted ASC 820-10 with respect to its non-financial assets and non-financial liabilities on January 1, 2009. The adoption of ASC 820-10 with respect to its non-financial assets and liabilities did not have a material impact on its financial statements.

Fair value represents the estimate of the proceeds to be received, or paid in the case of a liability, in a current transaction between willing parties. ASC 820 establishes a fair value hierarchy to categorize the inputs used in valuation techniques to measure fair value. Inputs are either observable or unobservable in the marketplace. Observable inputs are based on market data from independent sources and unobservable inputs reflect the reporting entity’s assumptions about market participant assumptions used to value an asset or liability. Level 1 includes quoted prices in active markets for identical instruments. Level 2 includes quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets; quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in inactive markets; and model-derived valuations

using observable market information for significant inputs. Level 3 includes valuation techniques where one or more significant inputs are unobservable. Assets and liabilities are classified according to the lowest level input that is significant to their valuation. Assets and liabilities that have a significant unobservable input along with significant observable inputs may still be classified Level 3.

Certain assets and liabilities were measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis. This category included the impairment of real estate. During 2010 and 2009, we recorded impairment charges to reduce certain investments in real estate assets to estimated fair value. The fair values of investment in real estate included inputs based on management’s estimate of net operating income, expected occupancy changes, expected rental rates, capitalization rates and discount rates based on available market information using a discounted cash flow analysis. Because one or more of significant inputs are unobservable, the fair values of investment in real estate are classified as Level 3.

The following table summarizes the two properties that were measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis as of December 31, 2010:

						Quoted
						Prices												Total
						in Active												Losses				Total
						Markets				Significant								Three				Losses
						for				Other				Significant				Months				for the Year
		Total Fair				Identical				Observable				Unobservable				Ended				Ended
		Value				Assets				Inputs				Inputs				December 31,				December 31,
		Measurement				(Level 1)				(Level 2)				(Level 3)				2010				2010
Paramount Business Center		$	1,749,000			$	—			$	—			$	1,749,000			$	(546,000	)		$	(1,106,000	)
Shoemaker Industrial Park		$	6,395,000			$	—			$	—			$	6,395,000			$	(987,000	)		$	(987,000	)
The following table summarizes the two properties that were measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis as of December 31, 2009:
						Quoted
						Prices												Total				Total
						in Active												Losses				Losses
						Markets				Significant								Three				for the
						for				Other				Significant				Months				Year
		Total Fair				Identical				Observable				Unobservable				Ended				Ended
		Value				Assets				Inputs				Inputs				December 31,				December 31,
		Measurement				(Level 1)				(Level 2)				(Level 3)				2009				2009
Zenith Drive Centre		$	1,727,000			$	—			$	—			$	1,727,000			$	—			$	(1,216,000	)
Shoemaker Industrial Park		$	7,495,000			$	—			$	—			$	7,495,000			$	(1,880,000	)		$	(1,880,000	)