Attached files

file filename
EX-32.2 - WEARABLE HEALTH SOLUTIONS, INC.v214773_ex32-2.htm
EX-32.1 - WEARABLE HEALTH SOLUTIONS, INC.v214773_ex32-1.htm
EX-31.1 - WEARABLE HEALTH SOLUTIONS, INC.v214773_ex31-1.htm
EX-31.2 - WEARABLE HEALTH SOLUTIONS, INC.v214773_ex31-2.htm

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
 

 
FORM 10-Q
 

 
x
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
 
For the quarterly period ended December 31, 2010
 
¨
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
 
For the transition period from ______to______
 
MEDICAL ALARM CONCEPTS HOLDING, INC.
 
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its Charter)
 
NEVADA
 
333-153290
 
26-3534190
(State or other jurisdiction of
 
(Commission File No.)
 
(I.R.S. Employee Identification No.)
incorporation or organization)
 
 
 
 
 
5215-C Militia Hill Road, Plymouth Meeting, PA 19462
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)
 

 
(877) 639-2929
(Registrant’s Telephone Number, Including Area Code)
 

 
(Former Name, Former Address and Former Fiscal Year, if Changed Since Last Report)
 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the issuer was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes ¨ No x
 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes ¨ No ¨
 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “ smaller reporting company ” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act (Check one):
 
Large Accelerated Filer ¨
 
Accelerated Filer ¨
 
Non-Accelerated Filer ¨
(Do not check if a smaller
reporting company)
 
Smaller Reporting Company x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act) Yes ¨ No x
 
State the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common equity as of March 14, 2011: 316,862,868 shares of Common Stock.

 
 

 

MEDICAL ALARM CONCEPTS HOLDING, INC.
FORM 10-Q
December 31, 2010
INDEX
 
PART I— FINANCIAL INFORMATION
 
 
 
 
Item 1.
Financial Statements
 F-1
Item 2.
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
 3
Item 3
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
 6
Item 4T.
Controls and Procedures
 6
 
 
 
PART II— OTHER INFORMATION
 
 
 
 
Item 2.
Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
8
Item 6.
Exhibits
9
 
 
 
SIGNATURE
10
 
 
2

 

ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
 
MEDICAL ALARM CONCEPTS HOLDING, INC.
 
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Page #
 
 
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2010 (Unaudited) and June 30, 2010
F-2
 
 
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three months and six months ended December 31, 2010 and 2009 (Unaudited)
F-3
 
 
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the six months ended December 31, 2010 and 2009 (Unaudited)
F-4
 
 
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
F-5
 
 
F-1

 

Medical Alarm Concepts Holding, Inc.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
 
   
December 31,
   
June 30,
 
   
2010
   
2010
 
   
(Unaudited)
       
             
ASSETS
           
             
CURRENT ASSETS
           
             
Cash
  $ -     $ -  
Restricted cash
    -       35,150  
Accounts receivable, net of allowance of $ and $12,855
    5,843       16,213  
Inventory
    43,680       71,322  
Prepaid expenses
    -       121,754  
Total current assets
    49,523       244,439  
                 
Property and equipment, net
    18,839       21,464  
                 
Security deposit
    2,160       2,160  
Patent, net of accumulated amortization of $937,497 and $833,331
    1,458,336       1,666,669  
                 
TOTAL ASSETS
  $ 1,528,858     $ 1,934,732  
                 
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT
               
                 
CURRENT LIABILITIES
               
Derivative liability - warrants
  $ 512,346     $ 1,489,055  
Accounts payable
    126,922       87,588  
Bank overdraft
    19,542       14,977  
Deferred revenue
    32,817       37,213  
Due to officer
    44,630       24,000  
Due to affiliate
    8,250       -  
Common stock to be issued
    15,000       -  
Accrued expenses
    55,884       12,177  
Total current liabilities
    815,391       1,665,010  
                 
Patent payable
    2,500,000       2,500,000  
                 
Convertible notes payable - face amount
    321,675       398,750  
Less original issue and notes payable discount
    (58,334 )     (157,517 )
TOTAL LIABILITIES
    3,578,732       4,406,243  
                 
STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT
               
Series A convertible preferred stock - at $0.0001 par value; 50,000,000 shares authorized, 550,000 issued and outstanding
    55       55  
Series B convertible preferred stock - at $0.0001 par value; 50,000,000 shares authorized, 9,950,000 and 34,700,000 issued and outstanding, respectively
    995       3,470  
Common stock - at $0.0001 par value; 800,000,000 shares authorized 305,261,940 and 201,590,744 issued and outstanding, respectively
    30,526       20,159  
Additional paid-in capital
    5,093,480       4,119,522  
Accumulated deficit
    (7,174,930 )     (6,614,717 )
Total stockholders' deficit
    (2,049,874 )     (2,471,511 )
                 
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT
  $ 1,528,858     $ 1,934,732  
 
See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.

 
F-2

 

Medical Alarm Concepts Holding, Inc.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Unaudited)
 
   
Three Months Ended
   
Six Months Ended
 
   
December 31,
   
December 31,
 
   
2010
   
2009
   
2010
   
2009
 
                         
Revenue
  $ 106,700     $ 332,829     $ 201,333     $ 332,829  
Cost of sales
    42,341       171,700       84,352       171,700  
                                 
Gross Profit
    64,359       161,129       116,981       161,129  
                                 
Operating expenses
                               
Advertising
    388,880       146,242       531,784       164,888  
Amortization
    104,167       104,167       208,333       208,333  
Compensation
    37,866       964,897       52,066       1,025,551  
Depreciation
    1,313       1,313       2,625       2,625  
General and administrative
    39,469       80,884       93,808       241,974  
Professional fees
    44,722       57,151       108,077       101,350  
Research and development
    71,536       -       74,288       57,763  
Travel and entertainment
    17,407       15,238       28,769       45,112  
                                 
Total operating expenses
    705,360       1,369,892       1,099,750       1,847,596  
                                 
Loss from operations
    (641,001 )     (1,208,763 )     (982,769 )     (1,686,467 )
                                 
Other income (expenses)
                               
Gain (loss) on derivative liabilities
    219,724       (18,554,362 )     565,872       (18,692,835 )
Other expense
    -       (11,349 )     -       (11,349 )
Interest expense
    (72,143 )     (159,021 )     (143,316 )     (328,328 )
                                 
Total other income (expenses)
    147,581       (18,724,732 )     422,556       (19,032,512 )
                                 
Loss before income taxes
    (493,420 )     (19,933,495 )     (560,213 )     (20,718,979 )
                                 
Provision for income taxes
    -       -       -       -  
                                 
Net loss
  $ (493,420 )   $ (19,933,495 )   $ (560,213 )   $ (20,718,979 )
                                 
Net loss per common share - basic and diluted
  $ (0.00 )   $ (0.32 )   $ (0.00 )   $ (0.38 )
                                 
Weighter average of common shares - basic and diluted
    285,362,723       62,978,965       247,132,983       54,119,183  
 
See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.

 
F-3

 

Medical Alarm Concepts Holding, Inc.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
 
   
Six Months Ended
 
   
December 31,
 
   
2010
   
2009
 
             
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES
           
Net loss
  $ (560,213 )   $ (20,718,979 )
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities
               
Common stock issued for services
    342,150       812,500  
Amortization of deferred compensation
    -       42,333  
Derivative instrument
    (565,872 )     18,692,835  
Depreciation
    2,625       2,625  
Amortization of patent
    208,333       208,332  
Amortization of original issue and notes payable discounts
    68,316       271,177  
Change in operating assests and liabilities:
               
Accounts receivable
    10,370       (4,751 )
Vendor deposit
            (52,744 )
Inventory
    27,642       -  
Prepaid expenses
    121,754       (289,361 )
Security deposit
    -       2,160  
Accounts payable
    39,334       33,616  
Bank overdraft
    4,565       -  
Due to affiliate
    8,250       -  
Customer deposit
    -       12,765  
Accrued expenses
    43,707       10,673  
Common stock to be issued
    15,000       115,000  
Deferred revenue
    (4,396 )     (17,764 )
Net Cash Provided by (Used in) Operating Activities
    (238,435 )     (879,583 )
                 
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
               
Restricted cash
    35,150       (2,500 )
Collection of subscription receivable
    -       205,000  
Proceeds from convertible notes
    -       48,500  
Sale of preferred stock
            580,000  
Due to officer
    20,630          
Sale of common stock, net of costs
    182,655       -  
Net Cash Provided by (Used In) Financing Activities
    238,435       831,000  
                 
NET DECREASE IN CASH
    -       (48,583 )
                 
CASH AT BEGINNING OF PERIOD
    -       50,751  
                 
CASH AT END OF PERIOD
  $ -     $ 2,168  
                 
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION
               
                 
CASH PAID FOR INTEREST EXPENSE
  $ 75,000     $ -  
                 
CASH PAID FOR INCOME TAXES
  $ -     $ -  
 
See accompanying notes to the financial statements
 
 
F-4

 

MEDICAL ALARM CONCEPTS HOLDING, INC.
December 31, 2010 and 2009
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
 
NOTE 1 - NATURE OF OPERATIONS
 
On June 4, 2008, Medical Alarm Concepts Holding, Inc. (“Medical Holdings,” “MAC,” or the “Company”) was incorporated under the laws of the State of Nevada. The Company was formed for the sole purpose of acquiring all of the membership units of Medical Alarm Concepts LLC, a Pennsylvania limited liability company (“Medical LLC ”).
 
On June 24, 2008, the Company merged with Medical LLC. The members of Medical LLC received 30,000,000 shares of the Company's common stock or 100% of the outstanding shares in the merger. As of the date of the merger, Medical LLC was inactive.
 
The Company utilizes new technology in the medical alarm industry to provide 24-hour personal response monitoring services and related products to subscribers with medical or age-related conditions.
 
NOTE 2 - SUMMARY OF ACCOUNTING POLICIES
 
Basis of Presentation
 
The accompanying interim financial statements for the six months ended December 31, 2010 and 2009 are unaudited and have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”) for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 8 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by U.S. GAAP for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. The results of operations realized during an interim period are not necessarily indicative of results to be expected for a full year. These financial statements should be read in conjunction with the information filed as part of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on November 10, 2010.
 
Use of Estimates
 
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements as well as the reported amount of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from these estimates.
 
Fiscal year end
 
The Company’s fiscal year ends on June 30.
 
Cash Equivalents
 
The Company considers all highly liquid investments with maturities of three months or less at the time of purchase to be cash equivalents.

 
F-5

 

Accounts receivable
 
Accounts receivable are recorded at the invoiced amount, net of an allowance for doubtful accounts. The allowance for doubtful accounts is the Company’s best estimate of the amount of probable credit losses in the Company’s existing accounts receivable. The Company determines the allowance based on historical write-off experience, customer specific facts and economic conditions. Bad debt expense is included in general and administrative expenses, if any.
 
Outstanding account balances are reviewed individually for collectability. Account balances are charged off against the allowance after all means of collection have been exhausted and the potential for recovery is considered remote.
 
The Company does not have any off-balance-sheet credit exposure to its customers.
 
Inventory
 
The Company values inventory, consisting of purchased products, at the lower of cost or market. Cost is determined on the first-in and first-out (“FIFO”) method. The Company regularly reviews its inventories on hand and, when necessary, records a provision for excess or obsolete inventories based primarily on current selling price and spot market prices. The Company determined that there was no inventory obsolescence as of December 31, 2010 or 2009.
 
Property and equipment
 
Furniture and fixtures and office equipment are recorded at cost. Expenditures for major additions and betterments are capitalized. Maintenance and repairs are charged to operations as incurred. Depreciation of furniture and fixtures and office equipment is computed by the straight-line method (after taking into account their respective estimated residual values) over their estimated useful life of seven (7) and five (5) years, respectively. Upon sale or retirement of office equipment, the related cost and accumulated depreciation are removed from the accounts and any gain or loss is reflected in statements of operations.
 
Patent
 
The Company has adopted the guidelines as set out in section 330-30-35-6 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for patent costs. Under the requirements as set out, the Company capitalizes and amortizes patent costs associated with the licensed product the Company intends to sell pursuant to the Purchase Agreement and the Patent Assignment Agreements, entered into on July 10, 2008 effective July 30, 2008, over their estimated useful life of six (6) years. The costs of defending and maintaining patents are expensed as incurred. Upon becoming fully amortized, the related cost and accumulated amortization are removed from the accounts.
 
Impairment of long-lived assets
 
The Company follows section 360-10-05-4 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for its long-lived assets. The Company reviews it long-lived assets, which include property and equipment, and patents, for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable.

 
F-6

 

The Company assesses the recoverability of its long-lived assets by comparing the projected undiscounted net cash flows associated with the related long-lived asset or group of long-lived assets over their remaining estimated useful lives against their respective carrying amounts. Impairment, if any, is based on the excess of the carrying amount over the fair value of those assets. Fair value is generally determined using an asset’s expected future discounted cash flows or market value, if readily determinable. If long-lived assets are determined to be recoverable, but the newly determined remaining estimated useful lives are shorter than originally estimated, the net book values of the long-lived assets are depreciated or amortized over the newly determined remaining estimated useful lives. The Company determined that there were no impairments of long-lived assets as of December 31, 2010 or 2009.
 
Deferred revenue
 
All revenues from subscription arrangements are recognized ratably over the term of such arrangements.
 
Discount on debt
 
The Company has allocated the proceeds received from convertible debt instruments between the underlying debt instruments and has recorded the beneficial conversion feature as equity in accordance with paragraph 810-10-05-4 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification. The conversion feature and certain other features were not considered embedded derivative instruments at December 31, 2010. The Company has also recorded the resulting discount on debt related to the warrants and is amortizing the discount using the effective interest rate method over the life of the debt instruments.
 
Derivative warrant liability
 
The Company evaluates its convertible debt, options, warrants or other contracts to determine if those contracts or embedded components of those contracts qualify as derivatives to be separately accounted for in accordance with paragraph 810-10-05-4 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification and paragraph 815-40-25 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification. The result of this accounting treatment is that the fair value of the embedded derivative is marked-to-market each balance sheet date and recorded as a liability. In the event that the fair value is recorded as a liability, the change in fair value is recorded in the Statement of Operations as other income or expense. Upon conversion, exercise or cancellation of a derivative instrument, the instrument is marked to fair value at the conversion date and then the related fair value is reclassified to equity.
 
In circumstances where the embedded conversion option in a convertible instrument is required to be bifurcated and there are also other embedded derivative instruments in the convertible instrument that are required to be bifurcated, the bifurcated derivative instruments are accounted for as a single, compound derivative instrument.
 
The classification of derivative instruments, including whether such instruments should be recorded as liabilities or as equity, is re-assessed at the end of each reporting period. Equity instruments that are initially classified as equity that become subject to reclassification are reclassified to liability at the fair value of the instrument on the reclassification date. Derivative instrument liabilities will be classified in the balance sheet as current or non-current based on whether or not net-cash settlement of the derivative instrument is expected within 12 months of the balance sheet date.

 
F-7

 

On January 1, 2009, the Company adopted Section 815-40-15 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“Section 815-40-15”) to determine whether an instrument (or an embedded feature) is indexed to the Company’s own stock. Section 815-40-15 provides that an entity should use a two-step approach to evaluate whether an equity-linked financial instrument (or embedded feature) is indexed to its own stock, including evaluating the instrument’s contingent exercise and settlement provisions. The adoption of Section 815-40-15 has affected the accounting for (i) certain freestanding warrants that contain exercise price adjustment features and (ii) convertible bonds issued by foreign subsidiaries with a strike price denominated in a foreign currency.
 
The Company classified warrants to purchase 65,545,000 shares of its common stock issued in connection with its offering of common stock as additional paid-in capital upon issuance of the warrants. Upon the adoption of Section 815-40-15 on January 1, 2009, these warrants are no longer deemed to be indexed to the Company’s own stock and were reclassified from equity to a derivative liability with a fair value of $556,545 effective as of January 1, 2009. The reclassification entry included a cumulative adjustment to retained earnings of $138,745 and a reduction of additional paid-in capital of $417,800, the amount originally classified as additional paid-in capital upon issuance of the warrants.
 
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
 
The Company follows paragraph 825-10-50-10 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for disclosures about fair value of its financial instruments and paragraph 820-10-35-37 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“Paragraph 820-10-35-37”) to measure the fair value of its financial instruments. Paragraph 820-10-35-37 establishes a framework for measuring fair value pursuant to GAAP and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. To increase consistency and comparability in fair value measurements and related disclosures, Paragraph 820-10-35-37 establishes a fair value hierarchy which prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value into three (3) broad levels. The fair value hierarchy gives the highest priority to quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs. The three (3) levels of fair value hierarchy defined by Paragraph 820-10-35-37 are described below:
 
Level 1
Quoted market prices available in active markets for identical assets or liabilities as of the reporting date.
 
Level 2
Pricing inputs other than quoted prices in active markets included in Level 1, which are either directly or indirectly observable as of the reporting date.
 
Level 3
Pricing inputs that are generally observable inputs and not corroborated by market data.
 
The carrying amounts of the Company’s financial assets and liabilities, such as cash, accounts receivable, stock subscription receivable, prepaid expenses, accounts payable, bank overdraft, deferred revenues and accrued liabilities, approximate their fair values because of the short maturity of these instruments.
 
The Company revalues its derivative warrant liability at every reporting period and recognizes gains or losses in the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss) that are attributable to the change in the fair value of the derivative warrant liability. The Company has no other assets or liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis.

 
F-8

 

Revenue Recognition
 
The Company’s revenues are derived principally from utilizing new technology in the medical alarm industry to provide 24-hour personal response monitoring services and related products to subscribers with medical or age-related conditions. The Company applies paragraph 605-10-S99-1 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for revenue recognition. The Company will recognize revenue when it is realized or realizable and earned. The Company considers revenue realized or realizable and earned when it has persuasive evidence of an arrangement that the services have been rendered to the customer, the sales price is fixed or determinable, and collectability is reasonably assured.
 
Shipping and handling costs
 
The Company accounts for shipping and handling fees in accordance with paragraph 605-45-45-19 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification. While amounts charged to customers for shipping products are included in revenues, the related costs are classified in cost of goods sold as incurred.
 
Stock-based compensation for obtaining employee services
 
The Company accounts for equity instruments issued to parties other than employees for acquiring goods or services under guidance of section 505-50-30 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification. Pursuant to paragraph 718-10-30-6 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification, all transactions in which goods or services are the consideration received for the issuance of equity instruments are accounted for based on the fair value of the consideration received or the fair value of the equity instrument issued, whichever is more reliably measurable. The measurement date used to determine the fair value of the equity instrument issued is the earlier of the date on which the performance is complete or the date on which it is probable that performance will occur.
 
The fair value of each option award is estimated on the date of grant using a Black-Scholes option-pricing valuation model. The ranges of assumptions for inputs are as follows:
 
·
The Company uses historical data to estimate employee termination behavior. The expected life of options granted is derived from paragraph 718-10-S99-1 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification and represents the period of time the options are expected to be outstanding.
 
·
The expected volatility is based on a combination of the historical volatility of the comparable companies’ stock over the contractual life of the options.
 
·
The risk-free interest rate is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant for periods within the contractual life of the option.
 
·
The expected dividend yield is based on the Company’s current dividend yield as the best estimate of projected dividend yield for periods within the contractual life of the option.
 
The Company’s policy is to recognize compensation cost for awards with only service conditions and a graded vesting schedule on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period for the entire award.

 
F-9

 

Equity instruments issued to parties other than employees for acquiring goods or services
 
The Company accounts for equity instruments issued to parties other than employees for acquiring goods or services under guidance of section 505-50-30 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“FASB ASC Section 505-50-30”). Pursuant to FASB ASC Section 505-50-30, all transactions in which goods or services are the consideration received for the issuance of equity instruments are accounted for based on the fair value of the consideration received or the fair value of the equity instrument issued, whichever is more reliably measurable. The measurement date used to determine the fair value of the equity instrument issued is the earlier of the date on which the performance is complete or the date on which it is probable that performance will occur.
 
Income taxes
 
The Company accounts for income taxes under Section 740-10-30 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification, which requires recognition of deferred tax assets and liabilities for the expected future tax consequences of events that have been included in the financial statements or tax returns. Under this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are based on the differences between the financial statement and tax bases of assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates in effect for the year in which the differences are expected to reverse. Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance to the extent management concludes it is more likely than not that the assets will not be realized. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in the Consolidated Statements of Income and Comprehensive Income in the period that includes the enactment date.
 
The Company adopted section 740-10-25 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“Section 740-10-25”). Section 740-10-25 addresses the determination of whether tax benefits claimed or expected to be claimed on a tax return should be recorded in the financial statements. Under Section 740-10-25, the Company may recognize the tax benefit from an uncertain tax position only if it is more likely than not that the tax position will be sustained on examination by the taxing authorities, based on the technical merits of the position. The tax benefits recognized in the financial statements from such a position should be measured based on the largest benefit that has a greater than fifty (50) percent likelihood of being realized upon ultimate settlement. Section 740-10-25 also provides guidance on de-recognition, classification, interest and penalties on income taxes, accounting in interim periods and requires increased disclosures. The Company had no material adjustments to its liabilities for unrecognized income tax benefits according to the provisions of Section 740-10-25.
 
Net loss per common share
 
Net loss per common share is computed pursuant to section 260-10-45 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification. Basic net loss per common share is computed by taking net loss divided by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted net loss per common share is computed by dividing net loss by the weighted average number of shares of common stock and potentially outstanding shares of common stock during the period to reflect the potential dilution that could occur from common shares issuable through stock options, warrants, and convertible debt, which excludes 93,418,750 shares of common stock issuable under warrants, 550,000 shares of common stock issuable under the conversion feature of Preferred Series A shares, 9,950,000 shares of common stock issuable under the conversion feature of Preferred Series B shares and 30,844,304 shares of common stock issuable under the conversion feature of the convertible notes payable for the six months ended December 31, 2010. These potential dilutive shares of common stock were not included as they were anti-dilutive.

 
F-10

 

Commitments and contingencies
 
The Company follows subtopic 450-20 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification to report accounting for contingencies. Liabilities for loss contingencies arising from claims, assessments, litigation, fines and penalties and other sources are recorded when it is probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount of the assessment can be reasonably estimated.
 
Cash flows reporting
 
The Company adopted paragraph 230-10-45-24 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for cash flows reporting, classifies cash receipts and payments according to whether they stem from operating, investing, or financing activities and provides definitions of each category, and uses the indirect or reconciliation method (“Indirect method”) as defined by paragraph 230-10-45-25 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification to report net cash flow from operating activities by adjusting net income to reconcile it to net cash flow from operating activities by removing the effects of (a) all deferrals of past operating cash receipts and payments and all accruals of expected future operating cash receipts and payments and (b) all items that are included in net income that do not affect operating cash receipts and payments. The Company reports the reporting currency equivalent of foreign currency cash flows, using the current exchange rate at the time of the cash flows and the effect of exchange rate changes on cash held in foreign currencies is reported as a separate item in the reconciliation of beginning and ending balances of cash and cash equivalents and separately provides information about investing and financing activities not resulting in cash receipts or payments in the period pursuant to paragraph 830-230-45-1 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification.
 
Subsequent events
 
The Company follows the guidance in Section 855-10-50 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for the disclosure of subsequent events. The Company will evaluate subsequent events through the date when the financial statements are issued. Pursuant to ASU 2010-09 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification, the Company as an SEC filer considers its financial statements issued when they are widely distributed to users, such as through filing them on EDGAR.
 
 Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements
 
 In January 2010, the FASB issued the FASB Accounting Standards Update No. 2010-06 “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (Topic 820) Improving Disclosures about Fair Value Measurements”, which provides amendments to Subtopic 820-10 that requires new disclosures as follows:
 
1.           Transfers in and out of Levels 1 and 2. A reporting entity should disclose separately the amounts of significant transfers in and out of Level 1 and Level 2 fair value measurements and describe the reasons for the transfers.
2.           Activity in Level 3 fair value measurements. In the reconciliation for fair value measurements using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3), a reporting entity should present separately information about purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements (that is, on a gross basis rather than as one net number).

 
F-11

 

This Update provides amendments to Subtopic 820-10 that clarify existing disclosures as follows:
 
1.           Level of disaggregation. A reporting entity should provide fair value measurement disclosures for each class of assets and liabilities. A class is often a subset of assets or liabilities within a line item in the statement of financial position. A reporting entity needs to use judgment in determining the appropriate classes of assets and liabilities.
2.           Disclosures about inputs and valuation techniques. A reporting entity should provide disclosures about the valuation techniques and inputs used to measure fair value for both recurring and nonrecurring fair value measurements. Those disclosures are required for fair value measurements that fall in either Level 2 or Level 3.

This Update also includes conforming amendments to the guidance on employers' disclosures about postretirement benefit plan assets (Subtopic 715-20). The conforming amendments to Subtopic 715-20 change the terminology from major categories of assets to classes of assets and provide a cross reference to the guidance in Subtopic 820-10 on how to determine appropriate classes to present fair value disclosures. The new disclosures and clarifications of existing disclosures are effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2009, except for the disclosures about purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements in the roll forward of activity in Level 3 fair value measurements. Those disclosures are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2010, and for interim periods within those fiscal years.
 
In April 2010, the FASB issued ASU No. 2010-13, “Compensation—Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Effect of Denominating the Exercise Price of a Share-Based Payment Award in the Currency of the Market in Which the Underlying Equity Security Trades” (“ASU 2010-13”). This update provides amendments to Topic 718 to clarify that an employee share-based payment award with an exercise price denominated in the currency of a market in which a substantial portion of the entity’s equity securities trades should not be considered to contain a condition that is not a market, performance, or service condition. Therefore, an entity would not classify such an award as a liability if it otherwise qualifies as equity. The amendments in ASU 2010-13 are effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning on or after December 15, 2010.
 
In August 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-21, “Accounting for Technical Amendments to Various SEC Rules and Schedules: Amendments to SEC Paragraphs Pursuant to Release No. 33-9026: Technical Amendments to Rules, Forms, Schedules and Codification of Financial Reporting Policies” (“ASU 2010-21”), was issued to conform the SEC’s reporting requirements to the terminology and provisions in ASC 805, Business Combinations, and in ASC 810-10, Consolidation. ASU No. 2010-21 was issued to reflect SEC Release No. 33-9026, “Technical Amendments to Rules, Forms, Schedules and Codification of Financial Reporting Policies,” which was effective April 23, 2009. The ASU also proposes additions or modifications to the XBRL taxonomy as a result of the amendments in the update.
 
In August 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-22, “Accounting for Various Topics: Technical Corrections to SEC Paragraphs” (“ASU 2010-22”), which amends various SEC paragraphs based on external comments received and the issuance of SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin (SAB) No. 112, which amends or rescinds portions of certain SAB topics. The topics affected include reporting of inventories in condensed financial statements for Form 10-Q, debt issue costs in conjunction with a business combination, sales of stock by subsidiary, gain recognition on sales of business, business combinations prior to an initial public offering, loss contingent and liability assumed in business combination, divestitures, and oil and gas exchange offers.

 
F-12

 

Management does not believe that any other recently issued, but not yet effective accounting pronouncements, if adopted, would have a material effect on the accompanying financial statements.
 
NOTE 3 - GOING CONCERN
 
As reflected in the accompanying consolidated financial statements, the Company had an accumulated deficit of $7,174,930 at December 31, 2010, and had an operating loss of $982,769 for the six months then ended.
 
While the Company is attempting to generate sufficient revenues, the Company’s cash position may not be enough to support the Company’s daily operations. Management intends to raise additional funds by way of a public or private offering. Management believes that the actions presently being taken to further implement its business plan and generate sufficient revenues provide the opportunity for the Company to continue as a going concern. While the Company believes in the viability of its strategy to increase revenues and in its ability to raise additional funds, there can be no assurances to that effect. The ability of the Company to continue as a going concern is dependent upon the Company’s ability to further implement its business plan and generate sufficient revenues.
 
The consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might be necessary if the Company is unable to continue as a going concern.
 
NOTE 4 - PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT
 
Property and equipment, stated at cost, less accumulated depreciation at December 31, 2010 and June 30, 2010 consisted of the following:
 
   
Estimated Useful Life
(Years)
 
December 31, 2010
   
June 30, 2010
 
Furniture and fixtures
 
7
 
$
20,000
 
 
$
20,000
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Office equipment
 
5
 
 
11,964
 
 
 
11,964
 
 
 
 
 
 
31,964
 
 
 
31,964
 
Less: accumulated depreciation
 
 
 
 
(13,125
)
 
 
(10,500
)
 
 
 
 
$
18,839
 
 
$
21,464
 

Depreciation expense for the six months ended December 31, 2010 and 2009 was $2,625 and $2,625, respectively.

 
F-13

 

NOTE 5 - PATENT
 
On July 10, 2008, the Company entered into a Purchase Agreement and Patent Assignment Agreement (the “Agreement”) to be effective July 31, 2008. The Company is obligated to pay the seller $2,500,000 on June 30, 2012. The Agreement specifies interest of 6% to be payable monthly, commencing on July 31, 2008. The seller will reacquire all patents and applications if payment is not made on June 30, 2012. The patent is being amortized over its estimated useful life of six (6) years.
 
 Patent, stated at cost, less accumulated amortization at December 31, 2010 and June 30, 2010, consisted of the following:
 
   
Estimated Useful Life
(Years)
 
December 31, 2010
   
June 30, 2010
 
Patent
 
6
 
$
2,500,000
 
 
$
2,500,000
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Less: accumulated amortization
 
 
 
 
(1,041,664
)
 
 
(833,331
)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
$
1,458,336
 
 
$
1,666,669
 
Amortization expense for the six months ended December 31, 2010 and 2009 was $208,333 and $208,332, respectively.
 
NOTE 6 - CONVERTIBLE NOTES PAYABLE
 
 On March 30, 2009, the Company sold six (6) convertible promissory notes in the aggregate principal amount of $467,500. The aggregate gross proceeds of the notes were $425,000. The notes do not bear interest, but instead were issued at an aggregate discount of $42,500. The notes were due and payable April 30, 2010. The notes can convert into shares of the Company’s common stock, par value $0.0001, at $0.02 per share. The notes were extended one year and now accrue interest at 10% per annum with a market based variable conversion rate at the lower of 90% of market or $0.01. The notes require treatment as a derivative liability.
 
On March 29, 2010, a note holder converted $68,750 of a note for 3,437,500 shares of common stock at a conversion price of $0.02 per share and the remaining balance of $398,750 was extended with the same terms and conditions to be due and payable March 31, 2011.
 
During the quarter ended September 30, 2010, certain note holders converted $40,375 of convertible notes for 4,037,500 shares of common stock at a conversion price of $0.01 per share
 
During the quarter ended December 31, 2010, certain note holders converted $36,700 of convertible notes for 4,993,196 shares of common stock at a conversion price of $0.00735 per share. The remaining balance of the convertible notes is $321,675 at December 31, 2010.

 
F-14

 

NOTE 7 - DERIVATIVE WARRANT LIABILITY AND FAIR VALUE
 
The Company has evaluated the application of ASC 815 Derivatives and Hedging (formerly SFAS No. 133) and ASC 815-40-25 to the Warrants to purchase common stock issued with the March 30, 2009, June 15, 2009, July 15, 2009 and December 7, 2009 Convertible Notes and service agreements. Based on the guidance in ASC 815 and ASC 815-40-25, the Company concluded these instruments were required to be accounted for as derivatives as of July 1, 2009 due to the down round protection feature on the conversion price and the exercise price. The Company records the fair value of these derivatives on its balance sheet at fair value with changes in the values of these derivatives reflected in the statements of operations as “Gain (loss) on derivative liabilities.” These derivative instruments are not designated as hedging instruments under ASC 815 and are disclosed on the balance sheet under Derivative liabilities - warrants.
 
ASC 820-10 (formerly FAS 157) defines fair value as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. ASC 820-10 also establishes a fair value hierarchy which requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. ASC 820-10 describes three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value: Level 1 – Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities; Level 2 – Observable inputs other than Level 1 prices, such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities; and Level 3 – Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are financial instruments whose values are determined using pricing models, discounted cash flow methodologies, or similar techniques, as well as instruments for which the determination of fair value requires significant judgment or estimation. The Company’s Level 3 liabilities consist of the derivative liabilities associated with the March 30, 2009, June 15, 2009, July 15, 2009 and December 7, 2009 warrants. If the inputs used to measure the financial assets and liabilities fall within more than one level described above, the categorization is based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement of the instrument.
 
 Level 3 Valuation Techniques
 
 Financial assets are considered Level 3 when their fair values are determined using pricing models, discounted cash flow methodologies or similar techniques and at least one significant model assumption or input is unobservable. Level 3 financial liabilities consist of the notes and warrants for which there is no current market for these securities such that the determination of fair value requires significant judgment or estimation. We have valued the notes and warrants that contain down round provisions using a lattice model, with the assistance of a valuation consultant, for which management understands the methodologies. This model incorporates transaction details such as the Company’s stock price, contractual terms, maturity, risk free rates, as well as assumptions about future financings, volatility, and holder behavior as of December 31, 2010. The warrants' primary assumptions include projected annual volatility of 140% and holder exercise targets at 200% of the projected exercise price for the warrants, decreasing as the warrants approach maturity. The notes' primary assumptions include projected annual volatility of 140%, a 2011 financing triggering a conversion price reset, and holder conversion targets at 200% of the projected conversion price for the notes, decreasing as the notes approach maturity. The fair value of the derivatives as of December 31, 2010 was estimated by management to be $512,346.

 
F-15

 

The foregoing assumptions are reviewed quarterly and are subject to change based primarily on management’s assessment of the probability of the events described occurring. Accordingly, changes to these assessments could materially affect the valuation.
 
 Financial Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis
 
 Financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis are summarized below and disclosed on the balance sheet under Derivative Liabilities:
 
   
As of December 31, 2010
 
   
Fair Value Measurements Using
 
   
Carrying Value
   
Level 1
   
Level 2
   
Level 3
   
Total
 
Derivative Liabilities
 
$
512,346
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
$
512,346
 
 
$
512,346
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Total Derivative Liabilities
 
$
512,346
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
$
512,346
 
 
$
512,346
 
 
The table below provides a summary of the changes in fair value, including net transfers in and/or out, of all financial assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) during the quarter ended December 31, 2010:
 
   
Fair Value Measurements Using Level 3 Inputs
 
   
Derivative Liabilities
   
Totals
 
Beginning Balance as of June 30, 2010
 
$
1,489,055
 
 
$
1,489,055
 
Total Gains or Losses (realized/unrealized) Included in Net Loss
 
 
(565,872
)
 
 
(565,872
)
Purchases, Issuances and Settlements
 
 
(410,837
)
 
 
(410,837
)
Transfers in and/or out of Level 3
 
 
 
 
 
 
Ending Balance at December 31, 2010
 
$
512,346
 
 
$
512,346
 

NOTE 8 - DUE TO OFFICER
 
For the six months ended December 31, 2010, the Company borrowed from the chief executive officer a net amount of $20,630 in advances. As of December 31, 2010, the outstanding balance is $44,630. The advances bear no interest and are payable on demand.

 
F-16

 

NOTE 9 - STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIT
 
 Series A Convertible Preferred Stock
 
 The Series A Convertible Preferred Stock has no voting rights, bears no dividends and is convertible at the option of the holder after the date of issuance at a rate of 1 share of common stock for every preferred share issued, however, the preferred shares cannot be converted if conversion would cause the holder to own more than 5% of the issued and outstanding common stock.
 
 Series B Convertible Preferred Stock
 
 The Series B Convertible Preferred Stock has no voting rights, bears no dividends and is convertible at the option of the holder after the date of issuance at a rate of 1 share of common stock for every preferred share issued, however, the preferred shares cannot be converted if conversion would cause the holder to own more than 5% of the issued and outstanding common stock.
 
 For the period ended June 30, 2010, the Company issued 34,700,000 shares of the Series B Convertible Preferred Stock for $769,000 in cash.
 
For the period ended December 31, 2010, the Company issued 11,625,000 preferred B shares to certain shareholders.
 
For the period ended December 31, 2010, certain shareholders converted 36,375,000 shares of Series B Convertible Stock for 36,375,000 shares of common stock.
 
Common Stock
 
On July 5, 2010, the Company sold 200,000 shares of its common stock at $0.01 per share for $2,000 in cash.
 
During the quarter ended September 30, 2010, certain note holders converted $40,375 of convertible notes at a conversion price of $0.01 per share for 4,037,500 shares of common stock.
 
For the quarter ended December 31, 2010, certain shareholders converted 36,375,000 shares of Series B Convertible Stock for 36,375,000 shares of common stock.
 
During the quarter ended December 31, 2010, certain note holders converted $36,700 of convertible notes at a conversion price of $0.00735 per share for 4,993,196 shares of common stock.
 
On December 15, 2010, the Company entered into private placement agreements for $30,000 at $0.01 per unit. Each unit consisted of 1 common share and 1 three year warrant at an exercise price of $0.01 per share subject to adjustment (3,000,000 common shares and 3,000,000 warrants). The additional paid-in capital was reduced by $15,103 for the derivative liability.
 
During the quarter ended December 31, 2010, the Company sold 15,065,500 shares of its common stock at $0.01 per share for $150,655 in cash.

 
F-17

 

During the quarter ended December 31, 2010, the Company issued 20,000,000 shares of its common stock at its fair market value of $0.01 per share or $400,000 for in services which run through January 2011. The unrecognized balance is included as deferred compensation in additional paid in capital.
 
Warrants
 
Stock warrant activities for the period ended December 31, 2010 is summarized as follows:
 
   
Number
of shares
   
Weighted
average
exercise
price
 
Outstanding at June 30, 2010
 
 
65,545,000
 
 
$
0.01
 
Granted
 
 
41,959,375
 
 
 
-
 
Exercised
 
 
14,085,625
 
 
 
-
 
Outstanding at December 31, 2010
 
 
65,545,000
 
 
$
0.01
 
 
Level 3 financial liabilities consist of the warrants for which there is no current market for these securities such that the determination of fair value requires significant judgment or estimation. The Company has valued the freestanding warrants that contain down round provisions using a lattice model, with the assistance of a valuation consultant, for which management understands the methodologies. This model incorporates transaction details such as the Company’s stock price, contractual terms, maturity, risk free rates, as well as assumptions about future financings and volatility. The primary assumptions include projected annual volatility of 210% and holder exercise targets at 200% of the projected exercise price for the warrants, decreasing as the warrants approach maturity. The fair value of the derivatives as of December 31, 2010 and June 30, 2010 was estimated by management to be $512,346 and $1,489,055, respectively.
 
 The foregoing assumptions are reviewed quarterly and are subject to change based primarily on management’s assessment of the probability of the events described occurring. Accordingly, changes to these assessments could materially affect the valuation.
 
NOTE 10 - RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
 
The Company subleases its office space from an affiliate owned by its officers. Total rent expense for the period ended December 31, 2010 was $7,500. The related party also paid $750 in utilities for the period ended December 31, 2010.

 
F-18

 

NOTE 11 - SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
 
The Company has evaluated all events that occur after the balance sheet date through the date when the financial statements were issued to determine if they must be reported. The management of the Company determined that there were certain reportable subsequent events to be disclosed as follows:
 
Common stock issuance
 
The Company issued 11,600,928 shares of common stock for the conversion of $50,000 of convertible notes at a share price of $0.0 0431 per share.

 
F-19

 

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
 
This section of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q includes a number of forward-looking statements that reflect our current views with respect to future events and financial performance. Forward-looking statements are often identified by words like believe, expect, estimate, anticipate, intend, project and similar expressions, or words which, by their nature, refer to future events. You should not place undue certainty on these forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements are subject to certain risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from our predictions.
 
Plan of Operation
 
The Company has taken the proven PERS system and upgraded it with a new state-of-the-art technology. We are introducing a 2-way voice speakerphone pendant that connects to a monitored call center. No other PERS system on the market today offers two-way voice communication directly through the pendant. In an emergency, the current systems require the user to be near the base station in order to communicate with the monitoring center. This leaves the user confined to a one-room radius of the base station at all times. Our system enables the user to communicate directly through their wearable pendant, leaving them free to move anywhere in and around the home.
 
Our primary focus is in the sale of our medical devices. We intend to link, install and monitor the medical alarm systems to a pre-designated central station. Our home communicator connects to a telephone line and our medical pendent, when activated, sends an automated digital telephone signal to a monitoring facility. Within seconds, a highly trained monitoring professional follows a prescribed response protocol to quickly assess the situation and provide an appropriate response. This may include calling the police, fire, or ambulance to respond to the situation, or calling family, friends, or neighbors.
 
In addition, we have a retail division that allows individuals who prefer not to pay the monthly fee, to make a one-time purchase of the unit. The unit will connect them to a designated personal contact or simply to 911.
 
Results of Operations
 
For the six months ended December 31, 2010, we had a gross profit in the amount of $116,981. Operating expenses for the six months ended December 31, 2010 totaled $1,099,750, resulting in a net operating loss of $982,769.

Capital Resources and Liquidity
 
As of December 31, 2010, we had $0 in cash.
 
 We believe we cannot satisfy our cash requirements for the next twelve months with our current cash and, unless we receive additional financing, we may be unable to proceed with our plan of operations. We do not anticipate the purchase or sale of any significant equipment. We also do not expect any significant additions to the number of our employees. The foregoing represents our best estimate of our cash needs based on current planning and business conditions. Additional funds are required, and unless we receive proceeds from financing, we may not be able to proceed with our business plan for the development and marketing of our core services. Should this occur, we will suspend or cease operations.
 
We anticipate incurring operating losses in the foreseeable future. Therefore, our auditors have raised substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern.

 
3

 

Recent Accounting Pronouncements
 
In June 2003, the SEC adopted final rules under Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, as amended by SEC Release No. 33-9072 on October 13, 2009. Commencing with its annual report for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2010, the Company was required to include a report of management on its internal control over financial reporting. The internal control report must include a statement:
 
·
of management’s responsibility for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over its financial reporting;
 
·
of management’s assessment of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting as of year end; and
 
·
of the framework used by management to evaluate the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.
 
Furthermore, the Company is required to file the auditor’s attestation report control over financial reporting on whether it believes that the Company has maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting.
 
In June 2009, the FASB approved the “FASB Accounting Standards Codification” (the “Codification”) as the single source of authoritative nongovernmental U.S. GAAP to be launched on July 1, 2009. The Codification does not change current U.S. GAAP, but is intended to simplify user access to all authoritative U.S. GAAP by providing all the authoritative literature related to a particular topic in one place. All existing accounting standard documents will be superseded and all other accounting literature not included in the Codification will be considered non-authoritative. The Codification is effective for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009.
 
In August 2009, the FASB issued the FASB Accounting Standards Update No. 2009-04, “Accounting for Redeemable Equity Instruments - Amendment to Section 480-10-S99,” which represents an update to section 480-10-S99, distinguishing liabilities from equity, per EITF Topic D-98, “Classification and Measurement of Redeemable Securities.” The Company does not expect the adoption of this update to have a material impact on its consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
 
In August 2009, the FASB issued the FASB Accounting Standards Update No. 2009-05 “Fair Value Measurement and Disclosures Topic 820 – Measuring Liabilities at Fair Value,” which provides amendments to subtopic 820-10, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures – Overall, for the fair value measurement of liabilities. This update provides clarification that in circumstances in which a quoted price in an active market for the identical liability is not available, a reporting entity is required to measure fair value using one or more of the following techniques: 1. A valuation technique that uses: a. The quoted price of the identical liability when traded as an asset b. Quoted prices for similar liabilities or similar liabilities when traded as assets. 2. Another valuation technique that is consistent with the principles of topic 820; two examples would be an income approach, such as a present value technique, or a market approach, such as a technique that is based on the amount at the measurement date that the reporting entity would pay to transfer the identical liability or would receive to enter into the identical liability. The amendments in this update also clarify that when estimating the fair value of a liability, a reporting entity is not required to include a separate input or adjustment to other inputs relating to the existence of a restriction that prevents the transfer of the liability. The amendments in this update also clarify that both a quoted price in an active market for the identical liability when traded as an asset in an active market when no adjustments to the quoted price of the asset are required are Level 1 fair value measurements. The Company does not expect the adoption of this update to have a material impact on its consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
 
In September 2009, the FASB issued the FASB Accounting Standards Update No. 2009-08 “Earnings Per Share – Amendments to Section 260-10-S99”, which represents technical corrections to topic 260-10-S99, Earnings per share, based on EITF Topic D-53, “Computation of Earnings Per Share for a Period that includes a Redemption or an Induced Conversion of a Portion of a Class of Preferred Stock” and EITF Topic D-42, “The Effect of the Calculation of Earnings per Share for the Redemption or Induced Conversion of Preferred Stock.” The Company does not expect the adoption of this update to have a material impact on its consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

 
4

 

In September 2009, the FASB issued the FASB Accounting Standards Update No. 2009-09 “Accounting for Investments-Equity Method and Joint Ventures and Accounting for Equity-Based Payments to Non-Employees”. This update represents a correction to Section 323-10-S99-4, “Accounting by an Investor for Stock-Based Compensation Granted to Employees of an Equity Method Investee.” Additionally, it adds observer comment “Accounting Recognition for Certain Transactions Involving Equity Instruments Granted to Other Than Employees ” to the Codification. The Company does not expect the adoption to have a material impact on its consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
 
In September 2009, the FASB issued the FASB Accounting Standards Update No. 2009-12 “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures Topic 820 – Investment in Certain Entities That Calculate Net Assets Value Per Share (or Its Equivalent),” which provides amendments to Subtopic 820-10, “ Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures-Overall, ” for the fair value measurement of investments in certain entities that calculate net asset value per share (or its equivalent). The amendments in this update permit, as a practical expedient, a reporting entity to measure the fair value of an investment that is within the scope of the amendments in this update on the basis of the net asset value per share of the investment (or its equivalent) if the net asset value of the investment (or its equivalent) is calculated in a manner consistent with the measurement principles of Topic 946 as of the reporting entity’s measurement date, including measurement of all or substantially all of the underlying investments of the investee in accordance with Topic 820. The amendments in this update also require disclosures by major category of investment about the attributes of investments within the scope of the amendments in this update, such as the nature of any restrictions on the investor’s ability to redeem its investments on the measurement date, any unfunded commitments (for example, a contractual commitment by the investor to invest a specified amount of additional capital at a future date to fund investments that will be made by the investee), and the investment strategies of the investees. The major category of investment is required to be determined on the basis of the nature and risks of the investment in a manner consistent with the guidance for major security types in U.S. GAAP on investments in debt and equity securities in paragraph 320-10-50-1B. The disclosures are required for all investments within the scope of the amendments in this update regardless of whether the fair value of the investment is measured using the practical expedient. The Company does not expect the adoption to have a material impact on its consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
 
Management does not believe that any other recently issued, but not yet effective accounting pronouncements, if adopted, would have a material effect on the accompanying financial statements.
 
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
 
Our financial statements and related public financial information are based on the application of U.S. GAAP. U.S. GAAP requires the use of estimates; assumptions, judgments and subjective interpretations of accounting principles that have an impact on the assets, liabilities, revenues and expense amounts reported. These estimates can also affect supplemental information contained in our external disclosures including information regarding contingencies, risk and financial condition. We believe our use of estimates and underlying accounting assumptions adhere to U.S. GAAP and are consistently and conservatively applied. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results may differ materially from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions. We continue to monitor significant estimates made during the preparation of our financial statements.
 
Use of Estimates: In preparing financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP, management is required to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and revenues and expenses during the reported period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
 
Revenue Recognition: Revenue is recognized when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, delivery has occurred, the fee is fixed or determinable and collectability is assured.

 
5

 

Stock-Based Compensation:
 
The Company accounts for its stock-based compensation under the provisions of SFAS No.123(R), “Accounting for Stock Based Compensation.” Under SFAS No. 123(R), the Company is permitted to record expenses for stock options and other employee compensation plans based on their fair value at the date of grant. Any such compensation cost is charged to expense on a straight-line basis over the periods the options vest. If the options have cashless exercise provisions, the Company utilizes variable accounting.
 
Common stock, stock options and common stock warrants issued to other than employees or directors are recorded on the basis of their fair value, as required by SFAS No. 123(R), which is measured as of the date required by EITF Issue 96-18, “Accounting for Equity Instruments That Are Issued to Other Than Employees for Acquiring, or in Conjunction with Selling, Goods or Services.” In accordance with EITF 96-18, the stock options or common stock warrants are valued using the Black-Scholes model on the basis of the market price of the underlying common stock on the valuation date, which for options and warrants related to contracts that have substantial disincentives to nonperformance is the date of the contract, and for all other contracts is the vesting date. Expense related to the options and warrants is recognized on a straight-line basis over the shorter of the period over which services are to be received or the vesting period. Where expense must be recognized prior to a valuation date, the expense is computed under the Black-Scholes model on the basis of the market price of the underlying common stock at the end of the period, and any subsequent changes in the market price of the underlying common stock up through the valuation date is reflected in the expense recorded in the subsequent period in which that change occurs.
 
In December 2002, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued SFAS No. 148, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation-Transition and Disclosure. SFAS No. 148 also amends the disclosure requirements of SFAS No. 123(R), requiring prominent disclosure in annual and interim financial statements regarding a company's method for accounting for stock-based employee compensation and the effect of the method on reported results.
 
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
 
We do not have any off-balance sheet arrangements, financings, or other relationships with unconsolidated entities or other persons, also known as “special purpose entities” (SPEs).
 
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
 
Not required for smaller reporting companies.
 
ITEM 4T. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
 
(a) Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures. Howard Teicher, our Chief Executive Officer, and Ronnie Adams, our Chief Financial Officer, evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of our fiscal quarter ended December 31, 2010 pursuant to Rule 13a-15(b) or Rule 15d-15(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). Disclosure controls and procedures are controls and other procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to our management, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. Based on his evaluation, Mr. Teicher concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules.
 
It should be noted that any system of controls, however well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable, and not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the system are met. In addition, the design of any control system is based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events. Because of these and other inherent limitations of control systems, there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions.

 
6

 

(b) Changes in internal control over financial reporting. In order to rectify our ineffective disclosure controls and procedures, we are developing a plan to ensure that all information will be recorded, processed, summarized and reported accurately, and as of the date of this report, we have taken the following steps to address the above-referenced material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting:
 
·
We will continue to educate our management personnel to comply with the disclosure requirements of the Exchange Act and Regulation S-K; and
 
·
We will increase management oversight of accounting and reporting functions in the future.
 

 
7

 

PART II - OTHER INFORMATION
 
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
 
On July 5, 2010, the Company issued 200,000 shares of its common stock at its fair market value of $0.01 per share or $2,000 in cash. The sale of the shares of common stock was made in reliance upon the exemption from securities registration afforded by Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.
 
During the quarter ended December 31, 2010, the Company issued 18,065,500 shares of its common stock at its fair market value of $0.01 per share or $180,655 in cash. The sale of the shares of common stock was made in reliance upon the exemption from securities registration afforded by Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.

 
8

 

Item 6. Exhibits.
 
(a) Exhibits
 
31.1 Certifications pursuant to Section 302 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 
31.2 Certifications pursuant to Section 302 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 
32.1 Certifications pursuant to Section 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 
32.2 Certifications pursuant to Section 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

 
9

 

SIGNATURES
 
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
 
 
MEDICAL ALARM CONCEPTS HOLDING, INC.
 
 
 
Date: March 16, 2011
By: 
/s/ Howard Teicher
 
 
 
Howard Teicher
 
 
 
Chief Executive Officer
 
 
 
 
 
 
By:
/s/ Ronnie Adams
 
 
 
Ronnie Adams
 
 
 
Chief Financial Officer
 
 
 
10