UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

 

 

Form 10-K

 

 

ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF

THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010

 

Commission File Number 0-26123

 

ONLINE RESOURCES CORPORATION

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)

 

 

(703) 653-3100

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

 

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

None

 

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

 

Title of Each Class

Common Stock, $0.0001 par value per share

 

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined by Rule 405 of the Securities Act.  Yes o     No þ

 

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act.  Yes o     No þ

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.  Yes þ     No o

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).  Yes þ     No o

 

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§ 229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.  o

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

 

(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act).  Yes o     No þ

 

The aggregate market value of the registrant’s voting and non-voting common stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant (without admitting that any person whose shares are not included in such calculation is an affiliate) computed by reference to $4.15 as of the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter was $129 million.

 

As of March 4, 2011, the registrant had 32,020,212 shares of common stock outstanding.

 

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

 

The following documents (or parts thereof) are incorporated by reference into the following parts of this Form 10-K: Certain information required in Part III of this Annual Report on Form 10-K is incorporated from the Registrant’s Proxy Statement for the 2010 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.

 

 

ONLINE RESOURCES CORPORATION

 

ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K

 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

SPECIAL NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

 

In addition to historical information, this Annual Report on Form 10-K contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. These statements relate to future events or our future financial performance. In some cases, you can identify forward-looking statements by terminology such as “may,” “will,” “should,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “intend,” “plan,” “believe,” “estimate,” “potential,” “continue,” the negative of these terms or other comparable terminology. These statements are only predictions. Actual events or results may differ materially from any forward-looking statement. In evaluating these statements, you should specifically consider various factors, including the risks outlined under “Risk Factors” in Item 1A. of Part I of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

 

Although we believe that the expectations reflected in the forward-looking statements are reasonable, we cannot guarantee future results, levels of activity, performance or achievements. Moreover, neither we nor any other person assumes responsibility for the accuracy and completeness of the forward-looking statements. We undertake no obligation to update publicly any forward-looking statements for any reason after the date of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

 

 

Business Overview

 

Online Resources provides outsourced, web- and phone-based financial technology services to financial institution, biller, card issuer and creditor clients to fulfill payment, banking and other financial services to their millions of consumer end-users. Our products and services enable our clients to provide their consumer end-users with the ability to perform various self-service functions including electronic bill payments and funds transfers, which utilize our unique, real-time debit architecture, ACH and other payment methods, as well as gain online access to their accounts, transaction histories and other information. We deliver our products and services to two primary vertical markets: Banking Services and e-Commerce Services.

 

 

The bill payment services we offer to our Banking clients use our proprietary payments gateway, which leverages real-time electronic funds transfer, also known as EFT, infrastructure and technology. By debiting end-users’ accounts in real-time, we are able to improve the speed, cost and certainty of payments, while eliminating the risk that bills will be paid against insufficient funds.

 

 

We currently derive approximately 80% of our revenues from payments and 20% from internet banking, account presentation and other services. These other services include customer care and consumer marketing services to support consumers and assist our clients in delivering a favorable user experience. It also includes professional services, including internet banking software solutions that enable various customization and deployment options.

 

We believe our domain expertise fulfills a significant need among both smaller financial services providers, who lack the internal resources to build and operate web-based financial services, and larger providers and billers, who outsource niche solutions in order to use their internal resources elsewhere. We also believe that, because our business requires significant infrastructure along with a high degree of flexibility, real-time solutions, and the ability to integrate financial information and highly reliable transaction processing, we provide valuable service offerings in defensible market segments.

 

We are headquartered in Chantilly, Virginia. We also maintain operations facilities in Princeton, New Jersey, Parsippany, New Jersey, Woodland Hills, California, Columbus, Ohio and Pleasanton, California and an additional data center facility in Newark, New Jersey. We were incorporated in Delaware in 1989.

 

Our Industry

 

The Internet represents an important channel for payments and account presentation services to consumers and businesses, driven in part by the 24 hours a day, seven days a week access to financial services that it makes available. By offering web- and phone-based services, financial services providers and billers become

more competitive within their markets; retaining existing end-users, attracting new ones and expanding end-user relationships.

 

Consumer demand for the services we enable for our financial institution and biller clients continues to grow. Forrester Research, a technology research and advisory firm, predicts that 65.9 million households will pay bills online in 2014, up from 48.3 million at the end of 2009, according to its October 2009 report, US Online Bill Payment Forecast: 2009 To 2014. Also, as referenced in its July, 2009 report, US Online Banking Forecast: 2009 to 2014, Forrester Research supported this growth proposition for the bank and credit union market when it estimated that the number of U.S. households banking online will grow from 53.8 million in 2009 to 66.1 million in 2014.

 

The largest U.S. financial services providers typically develop and maintain their own hosted solution for the delivery of web-based financial services and outsource only niche services. By contrast, the majority of small to mid-sized providers, including the approximately 16,000 banks and credit unions in the U.S. with assets of less than $20 billion, outsource their web-based financial services to a technology services provider. These smaller providers need to provide an increasing level of web-based services, but frequently lack the capital, expertise, or information technology resources to develop and maintain these services in-house.

 

Many of the factors driving the outsourcing of web-based financial services in the depository financial institution market are also driving the outsourcing of similar services in the credit card issuer and processor market. For example, credit card issuers are reducing operating costs while increasing cardholder loyalty as a greater number of cardholders use the web to manage their credit card accounts. Forrester Research, a technology research and advisory firm, reported in its July 2009 How US Credit Card Customers Use and Rate Issuers’ Secure Sites that 73% of US online adults who own a credit card now manage one or more of their credit card accounts online.

 

In the biller market, use of the online channel is being driven primarily by the high cost of processing paper bills and checks. According to the 2010 Federal Reserve Payments Study, an estimated 8.6 billion checks were written by U.S. consumers to pay bills in 2009, down from an estimated 10.7 billion in 2006. According to the US Postal Service, 41% of consumer bill payments were paid electronically in 2009 compared to 23% in 2004. We believe increased consumer access to the Internet, and the continued cost to both the biller and the consumer of processing paper bills and checks, will continue to drive billers toward use of the web channel to provide and manage their payments.

 

Our Strategy

 

Our objective is to become a leading supplier of electronic payments and related services to financial institutions, billers, card issuers and credit providers by developing advanced technology solutions, leveraging our proprietary payments gateway and delivering high quality supporting business process services.

 

During the second half of 2010, we undertook a comprehensive strategic assessment of our business and what would be required to achieve our objective. We first looked at the needs of the markets we serve and identified which of those needs are best served by the capabilities we have or can develop. We then identified strengths and weaknesses within our business and used those to develop areas of focus for improving product offerings, increasing client satisfaction and creating operating efficiencies in our business. These areas of focus include:

 

 

 

By focusing in these areas, we believe we can achieve the outcomes necessary to restart growth in our business and solidify our market position as a premier payments provider. These outcomes include:

 

Growing Our Client Bases.  Our banking clients are primarily regional and community-based depository financial institutions with assets of under $10 billion, though we also have relationships with larger depository financial institutions who value our ability to deliver their end-users’ payments within our biller network. We have one of the industry’s largest networks of billers who use us to provide payments and manage their complex payments mix. We also operate in the credit card market, servicing mid-sized credit card issuers, processors for smaller issuers and large issuers who use us to service one or more of their niche portfolios.

 

We have generally been growing our client bases except in banking bill payment only services, where commodity products and market consolidation have made it more difficult for us to compete, and among eCommerce Accounts Receivable Management, or ARM, clients, where we have been seeing attrition as we expand the compliance requirements we impose. While we expect the attrition in our ARM clients to be temporary, we expect that the loss of banking bill payment only clients will continue for several years, though at a declining rate. While we are aggressively working to retain as much of this banking client base as possible through early renewals, price reductions and migrations to higher value added products, our goal is to expand new client sales of our other banking products to offset these losses. We believe that our identified focuses on increasing client control through self-service tools, rebalancing our resources to drive innovation and improving awareness of our capabilities in the marketplace will help us to successfully accomplish this.

 

Increasing Usage of Our Services.  Following market trends, we continue to see increases in the number of consumers and businesses using web- and phone-based applications to initiate electronic payments within our existing client base. We benefit from these additional users and the resulting transaction volume increases as our clients typically pay us either usage or license fees based on their number of end-users or volume of transactions. We believe that changes we intend to make to our products that improve ease of use for end-users will help to increase use of our services. Additionally, we will continue to use our consumer marketing programs to assist our clients in growing the adoption and usage rates for our services.

 

Providing Additional Products and Services to Our Installed Client Base.  We are focused on making new products and services available to our clients through internal development, partnerships and alliances. In the past, we have introduced innovative products and services to the marketplace, such as our web-based collections support product that allows credit card issuers to direct past due end-users to a website where they can set up payment plans and schedule payments. We believe that by rebalancing our resources to add the skill sets necessary to profitably drive innovation, we can deliver the emerging products and services demanded by our markets.

 

Leveraging our Unique Payments Infrastructure.  We have developed and currently obtain real-time funds for banking payments through a proprietary EFT gateway with over 50 certified links to ATM networks and core processors. We have linked this EFT gateway to the large networks of billers that are a part of our eCommerce business. The result is one of the industry’s largest payments networks linking financial institutions and billers. We obtain significant cost benefits from this network as over 60% of our bank electronic transactions are now processed within our network at little or no incremental cost.

 

Our Services

 

We provide our bank, credit union, biller and creditor clients with payments, account presentation and other services that they offer to end-users branded under their own names. As an outsourcer, we also deliver to our clients the benefit of economies of scale they may not be able to achieve alone and specific technical expertise in managing the internet delivery of financial services and capabilities. We believe our services provide our clients with a cost-effective means to retain and expand their end-user base, deliver and manage

their services more efficiently and strengthen their end-user relationships, while competing successfully against offerings from other financial services providers and businesses.

 

Our primary service offerings are:

 

 

Bill Payment and Transaction Processing Services.  For our financial institution clients, our web-based bill payment services may be bundled with our account presentation services or purchased as a stand-alone service integrated with a third-party account presentation solution. Our payments services for these clients are unique in the industry because they leverage the banking industry’s ATM infrastructure and technology through our real-time EFT gateway, which consists of over 50 certified links to ATM networks and core processors. Through this proprietary technology, our clients take advantage of proven systems, security, clearing, settlement, regulations and procedures. End-users of our web-based payment service benefit from a secure, reliable, direct link to their accounts. This enables them to schedule transactions using our web user interface, including same-day, expedited payments. They can also obtain complete application and payment inquiry support through our customer care center. Additionally, clients offering our web-based payment services can enable their end-users to register for our personal financial management service, Money HQ sm, and other services that we can offer through our web interfaces.

 

Our remittance service provides an add-on payment service for financial institutions of all sizes that run their own in-house online banking system, or for other providers of web-based banking solutions that lack a bill payment infrastructure. This service enhances client systems by adding the extra functionality of bill payment processing, backed by complete funds settlement, payment research, inquiry resolution, and merchant services. End-users provide bill payment instructions through their existing online banking interface. That information is transmitted to us and we process and remit the bill payments to the designated merchants or other payees and settle the transactions with our financial institution clients.

 

For our biller clients, we provide a full suite of payment options that can be made available to consumers, including acceptance of payments made by credit card, signature debit card, ACH and PIN-less debit through multiple channels including online, interactive voice response, or IVR, and call center customer service representatives. These options also include flexible payment scheduling, convenience payments, bill presentment and other advanced payment and collection. We also provide our web-based collections support product that allows our biller clients to direct past due end-users to a specialized website where they can review account balances, set up payment plans and make payments.

 

For our credit card clients, we offer the ability to schedule either one-time or recurring payments to the provider through our account presentation software. We do not process these payments as our clients have this capability themselves but we have the ability to do so if requested. These clients may also use our web-based collections support product.

Online Banking and Account Presentation Services.  We currently offer account presentation services to financial institutions and card issuers. These services provide a comprehensive set of online capabilities that allow end-users to:

 

 

In addition, we offer our financial institution clients a number of complementary services. We can provide these clients business banking services for their small business end-users. Our Money HQ sm service allows consumer end-users to obtain account information from multiple financial institutions, view bills, transfer money between accounts at multiple financial institutions, make person-to-person payments and receive alerts without leaving their financial institution’s web site. We also offer mobile access, check images, check reorder, Quicken^® interface, statement presentment and other functionality that enhances our solution. End-user privacy is also protected by our multi-factor security solutions.

 

Customer Care and Consumer Marketing Services.  These services consist of the customer care services we maintain for our financial institution and biller clients, and the marketing programs we run on their behalf. Our customer care centers, located in Chantilly, Virginia and Columbus, Ohio, respond to end-users’ questions relating to enrollment, transactions or technical support. End-users can contact our consumer service representatives by phone, fax or e-mail 24 hours a day, seven days a week.

 

We view each interaction with an end-user or potential end-user as an opportunity to sell additional products that we offer. Through our marketing service offerings, our financial institution and biller clients can create a sales channel for, and increase adoption of, the web-based services we provide. We combine data, technology and multiple consumer contacts to acquire, retain, and sell multiple services to the end users of our financial institution and biller clients. We also guide consumers through the online banking and payments lifecycle, which ultimately results in more profits for our clients. The success of our process is evident in our rate of selling payments services to account presentation customers at a higher rate than the industry average. We believe this service is unique and differentiates us in the industry.

 

Professional Services.  Our professional services include highly customized software applications, such as internet banking and lending applications for our financial institution clients, which enable them to acquire more consumers via the web channel and to enhance customer relationships. Our professional services also include implementation services, which convert existing data and integrate our platforms with the client’s legacy host system or third party core processor, and ongoing maintenance of client specific applications or interfaces. Additionally, we offer professional services intended to tailor our services to meet the clients’ specific needs, including customization of applications, training of client personnel, and information reporting and analysis.

 

Third-Party Services.  Though the majority of our technology is proprietary, included as part of our web-based financial services platforms are a limited number of service capabilities and content that are provided or controlled outside of our platform by third parties. These include:

 

 

 

Our bank and credit union clients select one of two primary service configurations: full service, consisting of our integrated suite of account presentation, bill payment, customer care, end-user marketing and other support services; or stand-alone bill payment services. Our biller and credit provider clients use our payment transaction processing services, as well as a host of other services, including web-based collections. Our card issuer and creditor clients use our account presentation services and/or collections payments services

 

Our clients typically enter into long-term, recurring revenue contracts for our services. Most of our services generate revenues from recurring monthly fees charged to the clients. These fees are typically fixed amounts for applications access or hosting, variable amounts based on the number of end-users or volume of transactions on our system, or a combination of both. Clients also separately engage our professional services capabilities for enhancement and maintenance of their applications.

 

In the banking market, our clients generally derive increased revenue, cost savings, account retention, increased payment speed and other benefits by offering our services to their end-users. Therefore, most of our clients offer our services free of charge to their end-users. Billers offer many of our payment services to their end-users for free in order to increase speed of payments and facilitate collections, though they will often charge convenience fees to their end-users for certain payment services. In the credit card market, account presentation and payment services are also typically offered to end-users free of charge, though usage based convenience fees may apply to certain payments services.

 

Our Operations and Infrastructure

 

We connect to our clients, their core processors, their end-users and other financial services providers through our integrated communications, systems, processing and support capabilities. For our banking payment services we use our proprietary process to ensure real-time funds availability and process payments through a real-time EFT gateway. This gateway consists of over 50 certified links to ATM networks and core processors, which in turn have real-time links to a majority of the nation’s consumer checking accounts. In addition, we incorporate ACH and other payment methods in our services.

 

We have linked our real-time EFT gateway to the large networks of billers that exist within our eCommerce business. The result is one of the industry’s largest payments network linking financial institutions and billers. As billers move toward enabling real-time credits and we further integrate vertically, this network will enable faster payment delivery and posting for end-users, convenience fee revenue for banks and billers, and lower processing costs for us. Today, over 60% of bank electronic transactions are processed with our network at little or no incremental cost.

The following chart depicts our network:

 

 

We believe our payments infrastructure is difficult to replicate and creates a significant barrier to entry for potential payment services competitors. These key links were established throughout our history and enable us to access end-user accounts to draw funds and pay bills as requested. This gateway infrastructure has improved the cost, speed and quality of our bill payment services for the banking and credit union community and we believe differentiates us from others in the marketplace.

 

For our account presentation services, we employ both real-time and batch communications and processing to ensure reliable delivery of current financial information to end-users.

 

We typically interface to our clients and, in the case of banks and credit unions, their core processors, through the use of high-speed telecommunication circuits to facilitate both real time access and batch download of account and transaction detail. This approach allows us to deliver responsive, high performing, scalable, and reliable services ensuring capture and transmission of the most current information and providing enhanced functionality through real-time use of our communications gateways.

 

For the processing of payments initiated though many of our bank and credit union clients, we operate a unique, real-time EFT gateway, with over 50 certified links to ATM networks and core processors. This gateway allows us to use online debits to retrieve funds in real-time, perform settlement authentication and obtain limited supplemental financial information. By using an online payment network to link into a client’s primary database for end-user accounts, we take advantage of established EFT gateway infrastructure. This includes all telecommunications and software links, security, settlements and other critical operating rules and processes. Our payments gateway has allowed us to reduce the cost, while improving the speed and quality of the bill payment services we provide to these bank and credit union clients.

 

Where the payment services we provide do not include accessing the end-users’ accounts to retrieve funds, we use the Automated Clearing House, or ACH, network to obtain funds for payment. We initiate an ACH debit either directly against the account of the end user or against the account of a financial institution that has consolidated the funds for all payments requested by its end user customers. For our biller clients, we also process credit card transactions as source of funds for payments.

 

We use the Mastercard RPPS network, the ACH network and other delivery channels to credit funds to our biller clients and other merchants and payment recipients. We maintain comprehensive, proprietary biller and merchant warehouses for validation of remittance information, ensuring industry-leading accuracy in delivering payments. Our diverse biller and merchant base allows us to achieve extremely high levels of electronic payments, enhanced by tight technical integration with our biller clients.

Our Technology

 

Our systems and technology utilize both real-time and batch communications capabilities to create reliability, scalability, functionality and cost efficiency. All of our systems are largely based on a multi-tiered architecture consisting of:

 

 

Our systems architecture is designed to provide end-user access for banking and bill payment, primarily in application service provider, or ASP, mode. We provide a fully managed service hosted in our technology centers, utilizing single instances of our applications software to provide cost effective and fully outsourced operations to multiple clients. We also offer single instance software for certain of our applications that can be hosted in our technology centers or installed in a client’s facilities, allowing increased customization and operational control.

 

As a part of the strategic assessment of our business we conducted in the second half of 2010, we have identified areas where we can improve the reliability, efficiency and usability of our systems and technology through technology upgrades, systems consolidation, alternative data center and equipment strategies and rebalancing of technology-related resources. Among the initiatives that we plan to execute are:

 

 

We have established the processes, procedures, controls and staff necessary to provide our clients secure, reliable services. Our services and related products are designed to provide security and system integrity, based on Internet and other communications standards, EFT network transaction processing procedures, and banking industry standards for control and data processing. Prevailing security standards for Internet-based transactions are incorporated into our Internet services, including but not limited to, Secure Socket Layer 128K encryption, using public-private key algorithms developed by RSA Security, along with firewall technology for secure transactions. In the case of payment and transaction processing, we meet security transaction processing and other operating standards for each EFT network or core processor through which we route transactions. Furthermore, management receives feedback on the sufficiency of security and controls built into our information technology, payment processing, and end-user support processes from independent reviews such as semi-annual network penetration tests, an annual Statement on Auditing Standards (SAS) 70 — Type II Examination, periodic FFIEC examinations, and internal audits.

 

Our Sales and Marketing

 

We seek to retain and expand our financial services provider and biller client base, and to help our clients drive end-user adoption rates for our web-based services. Our client services function consists of client business executives who support and cross-sell our services to existing clients, a sales team focusing on new prospects, and a marketing department supporting both our sales efforts and those of our clients.

Our client business executives support our existing clients in maximizing the benefit of their web-based channel. They do this by assisting clients in the deployment and use of our services, applying our extensive relationship management capabilities and supporting the clients’ own marketing programs. The client business executive team is also the first contact point for cross-selling new and enhanced services to our clients. Additionally, this team handles contract renewals and supports our clients in resolving operating issues.

 

Our sales team focuses on new client acquisition, either through direct contact with prospects or through our network of reseller relationships. Our target prospects are financial services providers and billers who are either looking to replace their current web services provider, have no existing capability, or are looking for outsourced capability for a niche product line.

 

Our marketing department concentrates on two primary audiences: financial services providers and their end-users. Our corporate marketing team supports our sales efforts through marketing campaigns targeted at financial services provider and biller prospects. It also supports client business executives through marketing campaigns and events targeted at existing financial services provider and biller clients. Our consumer marketing team focuses on attracting and retaining end-users. It uses our proprietary integrated consumer management process, which combines consumer marketing expertise, cutting-edge technology using embedded software, and our multiple consumer contact points.

 

Proprietary Rights

 

On February 9, 1999, we were awarded U.S. Patent number 5,870,724 for targeting advertising in a home banking delivery service. This patent provides for the targeting of advertising or messaging to home banking users, using their confidential bill payment and other financial information, while preserving consumer privacy.

 

On January 26, 2010 we received a notice of allowance from the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) indicating that the USPTO would grant us a patent for application number 10/849,369, submitted on May 20, 2004. This application patent was a continuation of U.S. Patent number 5,220,501, which was granted in June 1993 and expired in December 2009, covering our real-time EFT network-based payments process allowing consumers using home terminals to purchase goods or services, pay bills and/or do home banking (the ’501 Patent). Although the term of this continuation application would normally have expired with expiration of the ’501 Patent in December 2009, the USPTO granted a patent term adjustment of approximately 3 years to account for delays in the review of the application. As a result, the patent for application 10/849,369 will not expire until December 2012.

 

Subsequently, on April 6, 2010 we were awarded U.S. Patent number 7,693,790. As indicated above, this patent, “Method and System for Remote Delivery of Retail Banking Services” (the ’790 Patent), is a continuation application of the’501 Patent. The ’790 Patent covers BSP bill payment transactions including payments using credit cards, debit cards and PINless debit via live agent, IVR and web-based payment systems.

 

Two continuing applications of the 501 patent, U.S. Patent numbers 6,202,054 and 7,076,458, which expanded the claims of the 501 patent to address a broader scope of Internet banking applications that use ATM network-compatible messaging, also expired. As a result of the expiration of these patents, we no longer have the ability to prevent current or potential competitors from mimicking our methods for using the ATM networks to make real-time debits and credits, increasing the speed of their Internet bill payment services and reducing a competitive advantage. The strict requirements of certifying to the ATM networks, time required to do so and know how needed to execute these non-standard transactions effectively, would still provide significant barriers to competitors trying to duplicate our network connections and methodologies.

 

In addition to our patents, we have registered trademarks. A significant portion of our systems, software and processes are proprietary. Accordingly, as a matter of policy, all management and technical employees execute non-disclosure agreements as a condition of employment.

Competition

 

We are not aware of any other company that provides highly integrated, comprehensive online financial services technology that is both scaled and flexible, and focused solely on the online channel. While a number of companies can offer the services provided by us and compete directly with us to provide such services, in many cases they have recently acquired such services and therefore cannot match our level of integration expertise and experience. In addition, in many cases these companies are focused on different services, with online financial technology being a secondary or tertiary offering. We may both compete with, and provide services for, other companies that also serve our targeted client bases. For example, we compete with S1 and Fiserv in aspects of our business, but they are also our channel partners for the distribution of certain of our bill payment services.

 

In the banking market, we compete with specialized providers of web-based software and services and diversified financial technology providers, such as banking core processors, who bundle web capabilities with their other offerings. Specialized web-based providers include Intuit, S1 , FundsXpress (a First Data company), Corillian (a Fiserv company), Jwaala and Q2 who sell banking account presentation capabilities and partner with others (including ourselves) for bill payment and other services. Specialized web-based bill payment providers include CheckFree (a Fiserv company), Fidelity Information Systems and iPay (a Jack Henry company). Specialized web-based bill presentment and personal financial management providers include firms such as Yodlee, who integrate their aggregation technology and direct links to billers with a third-party payment partner.

 

Other competition in the small and mid-sized banking market includes diversified financial technology providers, particularly banking core processors such as Fiserv, FIS, Jack Henry, John Harland and Open Solutions. These core processors typically have one or more account presentation platforms with varying levels of capability. Some core processors, including, Fiserv, Jack Henry, and FIS, also have captive bill payment capabilities. Other diversified financial technology providers, such as CashEdge and Intuit, compete with aspects of our business using their presentment and funds transfer products and services.

 

In the eCommerce market, we compete with web and telephone-based providers including biller and remittance service providers, credit card account presentation providers, and self-service collection software and services. Competition in the biller market includes JP Morgan Chase (through its Paymentech affiliate), First Data, CheckFree (a Fiserv company), FIS, Cleartran, DST Output and other diversified remittance and lockbox providers such as banks. We also compete with expedited payments providers, who provide billers and their customers with same day payments, sometimes charging the consumer a convenience fee. These competitors include Fiserv’s BillMatrix and Western Union’s Speedpay, as well as the captive expedited payment capabilities of our more diversified competitors. There are also several providers that compete with us in the bill presentment arena. These include Oracle’s eDocs, which does not have an outsourced payment processing capability and Kubra, whose solution combines bill printing and payment.

 

Other competition in the ecommerce market comes from providers of account presentation and payment to credit card issuers. These include specialized providers such as Corillian (a Fiserv company), and diversified credit card processors such as TSYS and First Data, who have captive web-based capabilities. We also compete with internal information technology groups of our large prospective clients, and with debit, bill payment and remittance providers for credit card payments. While the primary targeted market for our web-based collection service is card issuers, we also target other credit providers and collection agencies. Competition with our web-based collection service includes such firms Apollo and Debt Resolve, and the internal information technology groups of our large prospective clients.

 

Additionally, there are Internet financial services providers supporting brokerage firms, credit card issuers, insurance and other financial services companies. There are also Internet financial portals, such as Quicken.com and MSN, who offer bill payment and aggregate consumer financial information from multiple financial institutions. Suppliers to these remote financial services providers potentially compete with us.

 

Many of our current and potential competitors have longer operating histories, greater name recognition, larger installed end-user bases and significantly greater financial, technical and marketing resources. Further,

some of our more specialized competitors, such as CheckFree (a Fiserv company), have been part of continued industry consolidation where diversified financial technology providers have begun to position themselves as end-to-end providers and may increasingly direct their marketing initiatives toward our targeted client base.

 

Government Regulation

 

We are not licensed by the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, the Office of Thrift Supervision, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, the National Credit Union Administration or other federal or state agencies that regulate or supervise depository institutions or other providers of financial services. However, many of our current and prospective clients providing retail financial services, such as commercial banks, credit unions, brokerage firms, credit card issuers, consumer finance companies, other loan originators and insurers, operate in markets that are subject to extensive and complex federal and state regulations and oversight. Under the authority of the Bank Service Company Act, the Gramm Leach Bliley Act of 1999 and other federal laws that apply to retail financial service providers, federal depository institution regulators have taken the position that we are subject to examination resulting from the services we provide to the institutions they regulate. In order not to compromise our clients’ standing with the regulatory authorities, we have agreed to periodic examinations by these regulators, who have broad supervisory authority to remedy any shortcomings identified in any such examination.

 

Although we are not directly subject to regulation as a retail financial service provider, our services and related products may be subject to certain regulations and, in any event, must be designed to work within the extensive and evolving regulatory constraints in which our clients operate. These constraints include federal and state truth-in-lending disclosure rules, state usury laws, the Equal Credit Opportunity Act, the Electronic Funds Transfer Act, the Fair Credit Reporting Act, the Bank Secrecy Act, the Community Reinvestment Act, the Financial Services Modernization Act, the Bank Service Company Act, the Electronic Signatures in Global and National Commerce Act, regulations promulgated by the United States Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC), privacy and information security regulations, laws against unfair or deceptive practices, the USA Patriot Act of 2001 and other state and local laws and regulations. Given the wide range of services we provide and clients we serve, the application of such regulations to our services is often determined on a case-by-case basis.

 

In the future, federal, state or foreign agencies may attempt to regulate our activities. For example, Congress could enact legislation to regulate providers of electronic commerce services as retail financial services providers or under another regulatory framework. The Federal Reserve Board may adopt new rules and regulations for electronic funds transfers that could lead to increased operating costs and could also reduce the convenience and functionality of our services, possibly resulting in reduced market acceptance. Because of the growth in the electronic commerce market, Congress has held hearings on whether to regulate providers of services and transactions in the electronic commerce market, and federal or state authorities could enact laws, rules or regulations affecting our business operations. We also may be subject to federal, state and foreign money transmitter laws, encryption and security export laws and regulations and state and foreign sales and use tax laws. If enacted or deemed applicable to us, such laws, rules or regulations could be imposed on our activities or our business thereby rendering our business or operations more costly, burdensome, less efficient or impossible, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and operating results.

 

Furthermore, some consumer groups have expressed concern regarding the privacy, security and interchange pricing of financial electronic commerce services. It is possible that one or more states or the federal government may adopt laws or regulations applicable to the delivery of financial electronic commerce services in order to address these or other privacy concerns, whether or not as part of a larger regulatory framework. We cannot predict the impact that any such regulations could have on our business.

 

We currently offer services over the Internet. It is possible that further laws and regulations may be enacted with respect to the Internet, covering issues such as user privacy, pricing, content, characteristics and quality of services and products rendering our business or operations more costly, burdensome, less efficient

impossible, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and operating results.

 

Employees

 

At December 31, 2010, we had 603 employees. None of our employees are represented by a collective bargaining arrangement. We believe our relationship with our employees is good.

 

Additional Available Information

 

For more information about us, visit our web site at www.orcc.com. Our electronic filings with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC (including our annual report on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q and current reports on Form 8-K and any amendments to these reports) are available free of charge through our web site as soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically file with or furnish them to the SEC.

 

 

You should carefully consider the following risks before investing in our common stock. These are not the only risks that we may face. If any of the events referred to below occur, our business, financial condition, liquidity and results of operations could suffer. In that case, the trading price of our common stock could decline, and you may lose all or part of your investment.

 

Risks Related to Our Business

 

We cannot be sure that we will achieve profitability in future periods.

 

We have experienced some unprofitable quarters and cannot be certain that we can be profitable in all future periods. Unprofitable quarters may be due to the loss of one or more large clients or other factors. For example, we have had unprofitable quarters since our acquisition of Princeton due to increased cash and non-cash expenses associated with that acquisition and its financing. Although we believe we have achieved economies of scale in our operations, if growth in our revenues does not significantly outpace the increase in our operating and non-operating expenses, we may not be profitable in future periods. Recent economic, regulatory and market conditions have adversely impacted the financial services industry, particularly banks and credit unions.

 

Our clients are concentrated in a small number of industries, including the financial services industry, and changes within those industries could reduce demand for our products and services.

 

A large portion of our revenues are derived from financial service providers, primarily banks, credit unions and credit card issuers. Recently, financial services providers have been adversely affected by illiquidity, capital and regulatory constraints, credit tightening, industry consolidation, and other trends in the financial markets in which they operate. Unfavorable economic conditions adversely impacting those types of businesses could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. Depository financial institutions have experienced, and may continue to experience, fluctuations in profitability which, in the current market environment, may be extreme. Additionally, the entrance of non-traditional competitors and the current environment of low interest rates have narrowed the profit margins of depository financial institutions, increasing challenges to improve their operating efficiencies. As a result, the business and profitability of some financial institutions has slowed, and may continue to slow, their capital and operating expenditures, including spending on web-based products and solutions, which can negatively impact sales of our online payments, account presentation, marketing and support services to new and existing clients. Decreases in, or reallocation of, capital and operating expenditures by our current and potential clients, unfavorable economic conditions and new or persisting competitive pressures could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Our biller clients are concentrated in the health care, utilities, consumer lending and insurance industries. Unfavorable economic conditions adversely impacting one or more of these industries could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

 

The failure to retain existing end-users or changes in their continued use of our services will adversely affect our operating results.

 

There is no guarantee that the number of end-users using our services will continue to increase. Because our fee structure is designed to establish recurring revenues through monthly usage by end-users of our clients, our recurring revenues are dependent on the acceptance of our services by end-users and their continued use of account presentation, payments and other financial services we provide. Failing to retain the existing end-users and the change in spending patterns and budgetary resources of our clients and their end-users will adversely affect our operating results.

 

Any failure of our clients to effectively market our services could have a material adverse effect on our business.

 

To market our services to end-users, we require the consent, and often the assistance, of our clients. We generally charge our clients fees based on the number of their end-users who have enrolled with our clients for the services we provide or on the basis of the number of transactions those end-users generate. Therefore, end-user adoption of our services affects our revenue and is important to us. Because our clients offer our services under their name, we must depend on those clients to get their end-users to use our services. Although we offer extensive marketing programs to our clients, our clients may decide not to participate in our programs or our clients may not effectively market our services to their end-users. Any failure of our clients to allow us to effectively market our services could have a material adverse effect on our business.

 

Demand for low-cost or free online financial services and competition may place significant pressure on our pricing structure and revenues and may have an adverse effect on our financial condition.

 

Although we charge our client institutions for the services we provide, our clients offer many of the services they obtain from us, including account presentation and bill payments, to their end-users at low cost or for free. Clients and prospects may therefore reject our services in favor of those offered by other companies if those companies offer more competitive prices. Thus, market competition may place significant pressure on our pricing structure and revenues and may have an adverse effect on our financial condition.

 

If we are unable to expand or adapt our services to support our clients’ and their end-users’ needs, our business may be materially adversely affected.

 

We may not be able to expand or adapt our services and related products to meet the demands of our clients and their end-users quickly or at a reasonable cost. We have experienced, and expect to continue to experience, significant user and transaction growth. This growth has placed, and will continue to place, significant demands on our personnel, management and other resources. We need to continue to make investments in our infrastructure with the objective of assuring our systems are technologically current, robust and scalable as well as expand and adapt our infrastructure, services and related products to accommodate additional clients and their end-users, increased transaction volumes and changing end-user requirements. This will require substantial financial, operational and management resources. If we are unable to achieve this objective and expand and adapt our infrastructure and processes to support the variety and number of transactions and end-users that ultimately use our services, our business may be materially adversely affected.

 

If we lose a material client, our business may be adversely impacted.

 

Loss of any material client could negatively impact our ability to increase our revenues and maintain profitability in the future. Additionally, the departure of a large client could impact our ability to attract and retain other clients. Currently, no one client or reseller partner accounts for more than 4% of our revenues.

Consolidation of the financial services industry could negatively impact our business.

 

The continuing consolidation of the financial services industry could result in a smaller market for our bank-related services. Consolidation frequently results in a change in the systems of, and services offered by, the combined entity. If any of our financial service provider clients is acquired, this could result in the termination of our services and related products if the acquirer has its own in-house system or outsources to our competitors. This would also result in the loss of revenues from actual or potential retail end-users of the acquired financial services provider.

 

Our failure to compete effectively in our markets would have a material adverse effect on our business.

 

We may not be able to compete with current and potential competitors, many of whom have longer operating histories, greater name recognition, larger, more established end-user bases and significantly greater financial, technical and marketing resources. Further, some of our competitors provide, or have the ability to provide, the same range of services we offer. They could market to our client and prospective client base. Some of our competitors, such as core banking processors, have broad distribution channels that bundle competing products directly to financial services providers. Also, competitors may compete directly with us by adopting a similar business model or through the acquisition of companies, such as resellers, who provide complementary products or services.

 

A significant number of companies offer portions of the services we provide and compete directly with us. For example, some companies compete with our web-based account presentation capabilities. Some software providers also offer some of the services we provide on an outsourced basis. These companies may use bill payers who integrate with their account presentation services. Also, certain services, such as Intuit’s Quicken.com and Yahoo! Finance, may be available to retail end-users independent of financial services providers.

 

Many of our competitors may be able to afford more extensive marketing campaigns and more aggressive pricing policies in order to attract financial services providers. Our failure to compete effectively in our markets would have a material adverse effect on our business.

 

Our quarterly financial results are subject to fluctuations, which could have a material adverse effect on the price of our stock.

 

Our quarterly revenues, expenses and operating results may vary from quarter to quarter in the future based upon a number of factors, many of which are not within our control. Although our revenue model is based largely on recurring revenues, the actual amount of revenue in any period is derived from actual end-user counts and the volume of transactions conducted by those end-users in that period. The number of our total end-users and the number of total transactions they conduct are affected by many factors, many of which are beyond our control, including the number of new user registrations, end-user turnover, loss of clients, and general consumer trends. Our results of operations for a particular period may be adversely affected if the revenues based on the number of end-users or transactions forecasted for that period are less than expected. Consequently, our operating results may fall below market analysts’ expectations in some future quarters, which could have a material adverse effect on the market price of our stock.

 

Goodwill recorded on our balance sheet may become impaired, which could have a material adverse effect on our operating results.

 

As a result of acquisitions we have undertaken, we have recorded a significant amount of goodwill. We evaluate at least annually the potential impairment of goodwill that was recorded at each acquisition date. Testing for impairment of goodwill involves the identification of reporting units and the estimation of fair values. The estimation of fair values involves a high degree of judgment and subjectivity in the assumptions used. Circumstances could change which would give rise to an impairment of the value of that recorded goodwill. Examples of these circumstances could be continued deterioration of market conditions or a reduction in our share price, a change in discount rates or a change in our expectations of future results. Any

impairment would be charged as an expense to the statement of operations which could have a material adverse effect on our operating results.

 

Our limited ability to protect our proprietary technology and other rights may adversely affect our ability to compete.

 

We rely, and have relied, on a combination of patent, copyright, trademark and trade secret laws, as well as third-party nondisclosure agreements and other contractual provisions and technical measures to protect our intellectual property rights. There can be no assurance that these protections will be adequate to prevent our competitors from copying or reverse-engineering our products, or that our competitors will not independently develop technologies that are substantially equivalent or superior to our technology. To protect our trade secrets and other proprietary information, we require employees, consultants, advisors and collaborators to enter into confidentiality agreements. We cannot assure that these agreements will provide meaningful protection for our trade secrets, know-how or other proprietary information in the event of any unauthorized use, misappropriation or disclosure of such trade secrets, know-how or other proprietary information. Although we hold registered United States patents and trademarks covering certain aspects of our technology and our business, we cannot be sure of the level of protection that these patents and trademarks will provide. We may have to resort to litigation to enforce our intellectual property rights, to protect trade secrets or know-how, or to determine their scope, validity or enforceability. Enforcing or defending our proprietary technology is expensive, could cause diversion of our resources and may not prove successful.

 

Our failure to properly develop, market or sell new products could adversely affect our business.

 

The expansion of our business is dependent, in part, on our developing, marketing and selling new financial products to our clients and their customers. If any new products we develop prove defective or if we fail to properly market these products to our clients or sell these products to their customers, the growth we envision for our company may not be achieved and our revenues and profits may be adversely affected.

 

If we are found to infringe the proprietary rights of others, we could be required to redesign our products, pay royalties or enter into license agreements with third parties.

 

There can be no assurance that a third party will not assert that our technology violates its intellectual property rights. As the number of products offered by our competitors increases and the functionality of these products further overlap, the provision of web-based financial services technology may become increasingly subject to infringement claims.

 

Any claims, whether with or without merit, could:

 

 

In addition to the direct impact of any such claims on our business, results of operations and financial condition, potential negative reactions to any such claims could adversely impact our revenue and our relations with customers, suppliers, investors and others.

System failures could hurt our business and we could be liable for some types of failures the extent or amount of which cannot be predicted.

 

Like other system operators, our operations are dependent on our ability to protect our system from interruption caused by damage from fire, earthquake, power loss, telecommunications failure, unauthorized entry or other events beyond our control. We maintain our own and outsourced offsite disaster recovery facilities for our primary data centers. In the event of major disasters, both our primary and backup locations could be equally impacted. We do not currently have sufficient backup and disaster recovery facilities to provide full services if our primary facilities are not functioning. We could also experience potentially significant system interruptions due to the failure of our systems to function as intended or the failure of the systems we rely upon to deliver our services, such as: ATM networks, the Internet, the systems of financial institutions, processors that integrate with our systems and other networks and systems of third parties. Loss of all or part of our systems or the systems of third parties with which our systems interface for a period of time could have a material adverse effect on our business. We may be liable to our clients for breach of contract for interruptions in service. Due to the numerous variables surrounding system disruptions, we cannot predict the extent or amount of any potential liability.

 

Security breaches could have a material adverse effect on our business.

 

Like other system operators, our computer systems may be vulnerable to computer viruses, hackers, and other disruptive problems caused by unauthorized access to, or improper use of, our systems by third parties or employees. We store and transmit confidential financial information in providing our services. Although we intend to continue to implement state-of-the-art security measures, computer attacks or disruptions may jeopardize the security of information stored in and transmitted through our computer systems or those of our clients and their end-users. Actual or perceived concerns that our systems may be vulnerable to such attacks or disruptions may deter financial services providers and consumers from using our services.

 

Additionally, a majority of states have adopted, and the remaining states may be adopting, laws and regulations requiring that in-state account holders of a financial services provider be notified if their personal confidential information is compromised. If the specific account holders whose information has been compromised cannot be identified, all in-state account holders of the provider must be notified. If any such notice is required of us, confidence in our systems’ integrity would be undermined and both financial services providers and consumers may be reluctant to use our services.

 

Data networks are also vulnerable to attacks, unauthorized access and disruptions. For example, in a number of public networks, hackers have bypassed firewalls and misappropriated confidential information. It is possible that, despite existing safeguards, an employee or hacker could divert end-user funds while these funds are in our control, exposing us to a risk of loss or litigation and possible liability. In dealing with numerous end-users, it is possible that some level of fraud or error will occur, which may result in erroneous external payments. Losses or liabilities that we incur as a result of any of the foregoing could have a material adverse effect on our business.

 

The potential obsolescence of our technology or the offering of new, more efficient means of conducting account presentation and payments services could negatively impact our business.

 

The industry for web-based account presentation and payments services is subject to rapid change. Our success will depend substantially upon our ability to enhance our existing products and to develop and introduce, on a timely and cost-effective basis, new products and features that meet changing client and end-user requirements and incorporate technological advancements. If we are unable to develop new products and enhanced functionalities or technologies to adapt to these changes or, if we cannot offset a decline in revenues of existing products by sales of new products, our business would suffer.

We rely on internally developed software and systems as well as third-party products, any of which may contain errors and bugs.

 

Our products may contain undetected errors, defects or bugs. Although we have not suffered significant harm from any errors or defects to date, we may discover significant errors or defects in the future that we may or may not be able to correct. Our products involve integration with products and systems developed by third parties. Complex software programs of third parties may contain undetected errors or bugs when they are first introduced or as new versions are released. While we maintain quality assurance and audit processes as part of our software development life cycle, there can be no assurance that we will identify and remedy all errors in our existing or future products or third-party products upon which our products are dependent, with the possible result of delays in or loss of market acceptance of our products, diversion of our resources, injury to our reputation and increased expenses and/or payment of damages.

 

The failure to attract or retain our officers and skilled employees could have a material adverse effect on our business.

 

If we fail to attract, assimilate or retain highly qualified managerial and technical personnel, our business could be materially adversely affected. Our performance is substantially dependent on the performance of our executive officers and key employees who must be knowledgeable and experienced in both financial services and technology. We are also dependent on our ability to retain and motivate high quality personnel, especially management and highly skilled technical teams. The loss of the services of any executive officers or key employees could have a material adverse effect on our business. Our future success also depends on the continuing ability to identify, hire, train and retain other highly qualified managerial and technical personnel. If our managerial and key personnel fail to effectively manage our business, our results of operations and reputation could be harmed.

 

In June, 2010, our board of directors appointed Joseph L. Cowan as President and Chief Executive Officer and as a member of the Board of Directors. The transition to Mr. Cowan’s leadership of the Company is leading to changes in corporate strategy and execution. These changes may negatively impact our ability to meet key corporate and financial objectives, which could adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.

 

Our recent changes of chief executive officer may be viewed negatively and have an adverse impact on our business.

 

In addition to the appointment of Joseph L. Cowan as President and Chief Executive Officer, John C. Dorman, who served as interim Chief Executive Officer prior to Mr. Cowan’s appointment, now serves as Chairman of the Board of Directors. Until investors, employees, customers, suppliers, and others grow more familiar with Mr. Cowan’s and Mr. Dorman’s leadership, they could react negatively to their appointments. Matthew P. Lawlor, who had served as Chief Executive Officer and Chairman for the preceding twenty years, retired as Chief Executive Officer on December 14, 2009 and resigned as a director and Chairman on January 20, 2010. Our relationship with Mr. Lawlor is currently adversarial and Mr. Lawlor is pursuing litigation against the Company related to the financial arrangements associated with his retirement. In addition, Mr. Lawlor owns a significant number of shares of our common stock and could pursue a proxy fight or otherwise attempt to influence the affairs of the company. The potential negative reactions related to the change in our Chief Executive Officer and Chairman positions and any litigation or proxy challenge initiated by Mr. Lawlor could adversely impact our revenue, capital needs, ability to retain employees, relations with customers, suppliers, investors, and others, and our business in general.

 

We could be sued for contract or product liability claims and lawsuits may disrupt our business, divert management’s attention or have an adverse effect on our financial results.

 

Our clients use our products and services to provide web-based account presentation, bill payment, and other financial services to their end-users. Failures in a client’s system could result in an increase in service and warranty costs or a claim for substantial damages against us. There can be no assurance that the

limitations of liability set forth in our contracts would be enforceable or would otherwise protect us from liability for damages. We maintain general liability insurance coverage, including coverage for errors and omissions in excess of the applicable deductible amount. There can be no assurance that this coverage will continue to be available on acceptable terms or will be available in sufficient amounts to cover one or more large claims, or that the insurer will not deny coverage as to any future claim. The successful assertion of one or more large claims against us that exceeds available insurance coverage, or the occurrence of changes in our insurance policies, including premium increases or the imposition of large deductible or co-insurance requirements, could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. Furthermore, litigation, regardless of its outcome, could result in substantial cost to us and divert management’s attention from our operations. Any contract liability claim or litigation against us could, therefore, have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. In addition, because many of our projects are business-critical projects for financial services providers, a failure or inability to meet a client’s expectations could seriously damage our reputation and affect our ability to attract new business.

 

Failure to comply with financial network operating rules could reduce the value of our services to our clients and make those services more costly to provide.

 

Our services require interaction with several privately-operated financial networks. Each of these networks has its own evolving set of operating rules governing various aspects of the business we do with them, including transaction eligibility, data formatting, record keeping and processing and pricing methodology. For reasons of confidentiality, some of these networks also limit our access to their operating rules, making the task of compliance more difficult. Additionally, we can also be held accountable for compliance by our clients if they access these networks through us.

 

Our operating agreements with these networks give them the right to perform periodic examinations of our compliance with their operating rules. They have the sole authority to interpret these rules and can require us to stop or change anything we do that they consider non-compliant. Failure to comply with a network’s operating rules, or a disagreement with a network’s examiners regarding our compliance, could result in financial penalties, the inability to access the network or the loss of certain clients or lines of business using services relying on such network, each of which could adversely affect our revenue and profits. If we have to modify our services to maintain compliance, or if we cannot access a network, our services reliant on such network could become less valuable to our clients, we could be prohibited from providing such services or our operations could become more costly, each of which could adversely affect our revenues and profits.

 

Certain payment funding methods expose us to the credit and/or operating risk of our clients.

 

When we process an automated clearing house or automated teller machine network payment transaction for a client, we initiate a transaction to withdraw funds from the designated source account and deposit them into our off-balance sheet settlement account, which is a trust account maintained for the benefit of our clients. We then initiate a simultaneous transaction to transfer funds from our settlement account to the intended destination account. These “back to back” transactions are designed to settle at the same time, usually overnight, such that we receive the funds from the source at the same time as we send the funds to their destination. It is possible, however, that the source account may not have sufficient funds for the transaction, the institution controlling the account may commit an operational error causing insufficient funds to be sent or the account may be subject to legal or other constraints that prevent the withdrawal of the funds. The vast majority of these occurrences are resolved quickly though normal processes. However, if they are not resolved and we are then unable to reverse the transaction that sent funds to the intended destination, a shortfall in our settlement account will be created. We have legal and contractual recourse against our clients for the amount of the shortfall, but timing of recovery may be delayed by litigation or other legal processes. Additionally, the amount of recovery may be diminished if our clients’ creditworthiness is not then sufficient to cover the shortfall. If we are unable to recover the funds through any of these methods, we may have to fund the shortfall in our settlement account from our corporate funds.

Government regulation could interfere with our business.

 

The financial services industry is subject to extensive and complex federal and state regulation. In addition, our clients are heavily concentrated in the financial services, utility and healthcare industries, and therefore operate under high levels of governmental supervision. Our clients must ensure that our services and related products work within the extensive and evolving regulatory requirements applicable to them.

 

We are not licensed by the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, the Office of Thrift Supervision, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, the National Credit Union Administration or other federal or state agencies that regulate or supervise depository institutions or other providers of financial services. Under the authority of the Bank Service Company Act, the Gramm Leach Bliley Act of 1999 and other federal laws that apply to depository financial institutions, federal depository institution regulators have taken the position that we are subject to examination resulting from the services we provide to the institutions they regulate. In order not to compromise our clients’ standing with the regulatory authorities, we have agreed to periodic examinations by these regulators, who have broad supervisory authority to remedy any shortcomings identified in any such examination.

 

Federal, state or foreign authorities could also adopt laws, rules or regulations relating to the industries we serve that affect our business, such as requiring us or our clients to comply with additional data, record keeping and processing and other requirements. It is possible that laws and regulations may be enacted or modified with respect to the Internet, covering issues such as end-user privacy, pricing, content, characteristics, taxation and quality of services and products. If enacted or deemed applicable to us, these laws, rules or regulations could be imposed on our activities or our business, thereby rendering our business or operations more costly, burdensome, less efficient or impossible and requiring us to modify our current or future products or services.

 

If we cannot maintain a satisfactory rating from the federal depository institution regulators, we may lose existing clients and have difficulty attracting new clients.

 

The examination reports of the federal agencies that examine us are distributed and made available to our depository clients. A less than satisfactory rating from any regulatory agency increases the obligation of our clients to monitor our capabilities and performance as a part of their own compliance process. It could also cause our clients and prospective clients to lose confidence in our ability to adequately provide services, thereby possibly causing them to seek alternate providers, which would have a corresponding detrimental impact on our revenues and profits.

 

We could be affected by future laws or regulations enacted in response to climate change concerns and other actions.

 

Although we may not be directly affected by current cap and trade laws and current requirements to reduce emissions, we could be in the future. However, we could also be affected indirectly by increased prices for goods or services provided to us by companies that are directly affected by these laws and regulations and pass their increased costs through to their customers. Additionally, to comply with potential future changes in environmental laws and regulations, we may need to incur additional costs. At this time, we cannot estimate what impact such costs may have on our results of operations and financial position.

 

We are exposed to costs and risks associated with complying with corporate governance and disclosure standards.

 

We are spending an increased amount of management time and external resources to comply with changing laws, regulations and standards relating to corporate governance and public disclosure, including but not limited to, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, other SEC regulations and Nasdaq Global Select Market rules. In particular, Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 requires management’s annual review and evaluation of our internal control systems, and attestations of the effectiveness of these systems by our independent registered public accounting firm. We document and test our internal control systems and procedures and consider improvements that may be necessary in order for us to comply with the requirements

of Section 404. This process requires us to hire outside advisory services and results in significant expenses for us. In addition, the evaluation and attestation processes required by Section 404 are conducted annually. In the event that our chief executive officer, chief financial officer or independent registered public accounting firm determines that our controls over financial reporting are not effective as defined under Section 404 in the future, investor perceptions of our Company may be adversely affected and could cause a decline in the market price of our stock.

 

Risks Related to Our Capital Structure

 

Our stock price is volatile.

 

The market price of our common stock has been subject to significant fluctuations and may continue to be volatile in response to:

 

 

The stock market in general, and the Nasdaq Global Select Market specifically, have experienced extreme price and volume fluctuations and volatility that has particularly affected the market prices of many technology companies. Such fluctuations and volatility have often been unrelated or disproportionate to the operating performance of such companies. In the past, following periods of volatility in the market price of a company’s securities, securities class action litigation has often been instituted against a company. Litigation, if instituted, whether or not successful, could result in substantial costs and a diversion of management’s attention and resources, which would have a material adverse effect on our business.

 

We have a substantial number of shares of common and convertible preferred stock outstanding, including shares issued in connection with certain acquisitions and shares that may be issued upon exercise of grants under our equity compensation plans that, if sold, could affect the trading price of our common stock.

 

We have issued shares of our common and convertible preferred stock in connection with certain acquisitions and may issue additional shares of our common stock in connection with future acquisitions. For example, we issued shares of convertible preferred stock to a single investor group as a part of the financing for our acquisition of Princeton which are currently convertible into 4.6 million shares of common stock. We also have over 3.6 million shares of common stock that may be issued upon the exercise of stock options and or vesting of restricted stock. We cannot predict the effect, if any, that future sales of shares of common stock or the availability of shares of common stock for future sale will have on the market price of our common stock. Sales of substantial amounts of common stock (including shares issued upon the exercise of equity

compensation grants), or the perception that such sales could occur, may adversely affect prevailing market prices for our common stock.

 

We have a significant amount of debt and redeemable preferred stock which will have to be repaid and may adversely affect our financial performance.

 

In connection with our acquisition of Princeton in 2006, we incurred $85 million in debt and issued $75 million in redeemable preferred stock. Our debt balance at December 31, 2010 is approximately $36.8 million. The Company’s Series A-1 Preferred Stock is carried at its fair value at inception adjusted for accretion of unpaid dividends and interest accruing thereon, the 115% redemption price, the original fair value of the bifurcated embedded derivative, and the amortized portion of its original issuance costs, which approximates its redemption value. At December 31, 2010 its carrying value was $110.2 million. The principal and interest we pay on the debt and the amounts we accrete to the redeemable preferred stock reduce our earnings and our cash flows. The reduction of our earnings associated with this debt and redeemable preferred stock could have an adverse impact on the trading price of our shares of common stock.

 

Our plans to operate and grow may be limited if we are unable to obtain sufficient financing.

 

We may desire to expand our business through further strategic acquisitions and new markets when we identify desirable opportunities. We may need additional equity and debt financing for these purposes, but may not be able to obtain such financing on acceptable terms, or at all. Our existing debt financing limits our capacity to borrow additional funds and carries interest expense that burdens our cost structure. Additionally, the holders of our preferred stock must approve the issuance of any debt or equity financing except for equity issued in a public offering. Failure to obtain additional financing could weaken our operations or prevent us from achieving our business objectives. Equity financings, as well as debt financing with convertible features or accompanying warrants, can be dilutive to our stockholders. Negative covenants associated with debt financings may also restrict the manner in which we would otherwise desire to operate our business.

 

Holders of our outstanding preferred stock have liquidation and other rights that are senior to the rights of the holders of our common stock.

 

Our board of directors has the authority to designate and issue preferred stock that may have dividend, liquidation and other rights that are senior to those of our common stock. In connection with our acquisition of Princeton, our board designated 75,000 shares of our preferred stock as Series A-1 Redeemable Convertible Preferred Stock (“Series A-1 Preferred Stock”) all of which have been issued at a price of $1,000 per share. Holders of our shares of Series A-1 Preferred Stock are entitled to a liquidation preference, before amounts are distributed on our shares of common stock, of 115% of the original issue price of these shares plus 8% per annum of the original issue price with an interest factor thereon tied to the iMoneyNet First Tier Institutional Average. This will reduce the remaining amount of our assets, if any, available to distribute to holders of our common stock. In addition, holders of our Series A-1 Preferred Stock have the right to elect one director to our board of directors.

 

Holders of our Series A-1 Preferred Stock have voting rights that may restrict our ability to take corporate actions.

 

We cannot issue any security or evidence of indebtedness, other than in connection with an underwritten public offering, without the consent of the holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of Series A-1 Preferred Stock. We also cannot amend our certificate of incorporation nor have our board designate any future series of preferred stock if any such amendment or designation adversely impacts the Series A-1 Preferred Stock. Our inability to obtain these consents may have an adverse impact in our ability to issue securities in the future to advance our business.

Holders of our Series A-1 Preferred Stock have a redemption right.

 

After the seventh anniversary of the original issue date of our shares of Series A-1 Preferred Stock, which will occur in July 2013, the holders of such shares have the right to require us to repurchase their shares, if then outstanding, at 115% of the original issue price of these shares and a cumulative dividend at 8% per annum of the original issuance price with an interest factor thereon based upon the iMoneyNet First Tier Institutional Average. Upon the election of this right of redemption, we may not have the necessary funds to redeem the shares and we may not have the ability to raise funds for this purpose on favorable terms or at all. Our obligation to redeem these shares could have an adverse impact on our financial condition and upon the operations of our business.

 

Future offerings of debt, which would be senior to our common stock upon liquidation, and/or preferred equity securities which may be senior to our common stock for purposes of dividend distributions or upon liquidation, may adversely affect the market price of our common stock.

 

In the future, we may attempt to increase our capital resources by making additional offerings of debt or preferred equity securities, including medium-term notes, trust preferred securities, senior or subordinated notes and preferred stock. Upon liquidation, including deemed liquidations resulting from an acquisition of our company, holders of our debt securities and shares of preferred stock and lenders with respect to other borrowings will receive distributions of our available assets prior to the holders of our common stock. Additional equity offerings may dilute the holdings of our existing stockholders or reduce the market price of our common stock, or both. Holders of our common stock are not entitled to preemptive rights or other protections against dilution. Our Series A-1 Preferred Stock has a preference on liquidating distributions that could limit our ability to pay a dividend or make another distribution to the holders of our common stock. Because our decision to issue securities in any future offering will depend on market conditions and other factors beyond our control, we cannot predict or estimate the amount, timing or nature of our future offerings. Thus, our stockholders bear the risk of our future offerings reducing the market price of our common stock and diluting their stock holdings.

 

If we are unable to comply with the covenants in our credit agreement, a default under the terms of that agreement could arise thereby potentially resulting in an acceleration of the repayment of borrowed funds.

 

Our credit agreement requires us to comply with certain covenants, including prescribed financial requirements. Our ability to meet these requirements may be affected by events beyond our control, including, without limitation, sales levels, contract terminations and market pricing pressures. No assurance can be provided that our financial performance will enable us to remain in compliance with these financial requirements. If we are unable to comply with the terms of our credit agreement, a default could arise under this agreement. In the event of a default, our lenders could terminate their commitment to lend or accelerate any loans and declare all amounts borrowed due and payable. In this event, there can be no assurance that we would be able to make the necessary payment to the lenders or that we would be able to find alternative financing on terms acceptable to us.

 

 

We are headquartered in Chantilly, Virginia where we lease approximately 100,000 square feet of office space. The lease expires September 30, 2014. We also lease office space in Princeton, New Jersey, Parsippany, New Jersey, Woodland Hills, California, Pleasanton, California and Columbus, Ohio. Our Banking segment operates from our Chantilly, Virginia, Princeton, New Jersey, Woodland Hills, California and Pleasanton, California offices; our eCommerce segments operate from our Chantilly, Virginia, Princeton, New Jersey, Parsippany, New Jersey and Columbus, Ohio offices. We believe that all of our facilities are in good condition and are suitable and adequate to meet our operations. Additionally, we believe that suitable additional or alternative space will be available in the future on commercially reasonable terms as needed.

 

We are not a party to any litigation, individually or in the aggregate, that we believe would have a material adverse effect on our financial condition or results of operations.

 

 

 

Our common stock began trading on the NASDAQ National Market on June 4, 1999 and now trades on the NASDAQ Global Select Market under the symbol “ORCC”. The following table sets forth the range of high and low closing sales prices of our common stock for the periods indicated, as reported by NASDAQ:

 

 

The market price of our common stock is highly volatile and fluctuates in response to a wide variety of factors. For additional information, see Item 1A., Risk Factors — Our Stock Price is Volatile included in this Annual Report on From 10-K.

 

On December 31, 2010, we had approximately 123 holders of record of common stock. This does not reflect persons or entities that hold their stock in nominee or “street” name through various brokerage firms.

 

We have not paid any cash dividends on our common stock and currently intend to retain any future earnings for use in our business. Accordingly, we do not anticipate declaring or paying any cash dividends on our common stock in the foreseeable future.

 

For information regarding securities authorized for issuance under our equity compensation plans, see Note 14, Equity Compensation Plans , in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements contained in Part II, Item 8, of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

 

 

 

The selected consolidated financial data set forth below with respect to Online Resources’ Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008 and with respect to Online Resources’ Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 31, 2010 and 2009 are derived from the audited Consolidated Financial Statements of Online Resources Corporation, which are included in Item 8, Consolidated Financial Statements and Supplementary Data in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Consolidated Statements of Operations data for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006 and Consolidated Balance Sheet data at December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006 are derived from Consolidated Financial Statements of Online Resources not included herein.

The selected consolidated financial data set forth below is qualified in its entirety by, and should be read in conjunction with, the Consolidated Financial Statements, the related Notes thereto and Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations included elsewhere in this Form 10-K.

 

 

 

 

 

CAUTIONARY NOTE

 

The following discussion should be read in conjunction with Item 8, Consolidated Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. This discussion contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. Our actual results could differ materially from the results anticipated in these forward-looking statements as a result of factors including, but not limited to, those under Risk Factors contained in Item 1A, in this Annual Report on From 10-K.

 

OVERVIEW

 

We provide outsourced, web and phone- based financial technology services to financial institution, biller, card issuer and creditor clients and their millions of consumer end-users. We currently derive approximately 80% of our revenues from payments and 20% from other services including account presentation relationship management, professional services, and custom software solutions. End-users may access and view their accounts online and perform various web-based self-service functions. They may also make electronic bill payments and funds transfers, utilizing our unique, real-time debit architecture, ACH and other payment methods. Our value-added relationship management services reinforce a favorable user experience and drive a profitable and competitive Internet channel for our clients. Further, we have professional services, including software solutions, which enable various deployment options, a broad range of customization and other value-added services.

 

We currently operate in two business segments — Banking and eCommerce. The operating results of these business segments exclude general corporate overhead expenses. Within each business segment, we face differing opportunities, challenges and risks. In our Banking segment we have the opportunity to deploy the new and enhanced products we have developed to expand and deepen the relationships we have with our existing clients. Our differentiated account presentation and payments products, as well as our ability to deliver a full suite of remote delivery financial services, provide the opportunity for us to increase market share particularly among mid-sized financial institutions. In the bank market, a very large percentage of financial institutions now offer internet banking and bill payment to their customers. We therefore face competition in our efforts to obtain new clients from other established providers of these services. The end-user base within these clients is not highly penetrated, however, so we benefit from continuing adoption increases.

 

Additionally, financial service providers have recently been adversely affected by significant illiquidity and credit tightening trends in the financial markets in which they operate. Unfavorable economic conditions adversely impacting those types of business could have a material adverse effect on our business.

 

In our eCommerce segment, there are still a significant number of potential clients who do not offer services such as those we are in a position to provide to their customer base. Further, the competition to provide these services is more fragmented than it is in the banking market. These factors provide us with the opportunity to expand our client base. We also offer an innovative debt collection product that is attractive to a number of large and mid-sized potential clients. For a portion of our eCommerce business, our revenue is tied to the value of the payment being made which exposes us to the impact of economic factors on these payments. We also continuously monitor the potential risks that we face due to the interfaces we have with, and our reliance on, various payments networks.

 

Across our markets, we are exposed to interest rate risk as we earn interest income from the bill payment funds in transit we hold on behalf of our end-users. We also closely monitor covenant and other compliance requirements under our debt and preferred stock agreements, as well as other potential risks associated with our capital structure.

 

We have experienced, and expect to continue to experience, significant user and transaction growth. This growth has placed, and will continue to place, significant demands on our personnel, management and other resources. We will need to continue to expand and adapt our infrastructure, services and related products to

accommodate additional clients and their end-users, increased transaction volumes and changing end-user requirements.

 

Registered end-users using account presentation, bill payment or both, and the payment transactions executed by those end-users are the major drivers of our revenues. Since December 31, 2009, the number of users of our account presentation services increased 3%, and the number of users of our payment services increased 15%, for an overall 12% increase in users.

 

The following table summarizes users and payment services transactions:

 

 

We have long-term service contracts with most of our clients. The majority of our revenues are recurring, though these contracts also provide for implementation, set-up and other non-recurring fees. Account presentation services revenues are based on either a monthly license fee, allowing our clients to register an unlimited number of customers, or a monthly fee for each registered customer. Payment services revenues are either based on a monthly fee for each customer enrolled, a fee per executed transaction, or a combination of both. Our clients pay nearly all of our fees and then determine if or how they want to pass these costs on to their users. They typically provide account presentation services to users free of charge, as they derive significant potential benefits including account retention, delivery and paper cost savings, account consolidation and cross-selling of other products.

 

As a network-based service provider, we have made substantial up-front investments in infrastructure, particularly for our proprietary systems. We invested approximately $5.9 million, $6.2 million, and $7.4 million for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009, and 2008, respectively. These investments were made to create new products, enhance the functionality of existing products and improve our infrastructure. Product enhancements allow us to remain competitive, retain existing clients and attract new clients. New products allow us to increase revenue and attract new clients. Infrastructure investments allow us to leverage ongoing advances in technology to improve our operating efficiency and capture cost savings.

 

While we continue to incur ongoing development and maintenance costs, we believe the infrastructure we have built provides us with significant operating leverage. We continue to automate processes and develop applications that allow us to make only small increases in labor and other operating costs relative to increases in customers and transactions. We believe our financial and operating performance will be based primarily on

our ability to leverage additional end-users and transactions over this relatively fixed cost base. We do not incur material research and development costs.

 

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

 

The policies discussed below are considered by management to be critical to an understanding of our consolidated financial statements because their application places the most significant demands on management’s judgment, with financial reporting results relying on estimates about the effect of matters that are inherently uncertain. Specific risks for these critical accounting policies are described in the following paragraphs. For all of these policies, management cautions that future events rarely develop exactly as forecasted, and the best estimates routinely require adjustment.

 

Revenue Recognition Policy.  We generate revenues from service fees, professional services and other supporting services as a financial technology services provider in the Banking and eCommerce markets. Service fee revenues are generally comprised of account presentation services, payment services and relationship management services. Many of our contracts contain monthly user fees, transaction fees and new user registration fees for the account presentation services, payment services and relationship management services we offer that are often subject to monthly minimums, all of which are classified as service fees, for account presentation, payment, relationship management and professional services, in our consolidated statements of operations. Additionally, some contracts contain fees for relationship management marketing programs which are also classified as service fees in our consolidated statements of operations. These services are not considered separate deliverables. Fees for relationship management marketing programs, monthly user and transaction fees, including the monthly minimums, are recognized in the month in which the services are provided or, in the case of minimums, in the month to which the minimum applies. We recognize service fee revenue when all of the following criteria are met: a) persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists; b) delivery has occurred or services have been rendered; c) the seller’s price to the buyer is fixed or determinable; and d) collectibility is reasonably assured. Revenues associated with services that are subject to refund are not recognized until such time as the exposure to potential refund has lapsed.

 

We collect funds from end-users and aggregate them in clearing accounts, which are not included in our consolidated balance sheets, as we do not have ownership of these funds. For certain transactions, funds may remain in the clearing accounts until a payment check is deposited or other payment transmission is accepted by the receiving merchant. We earn interest on these funds for the period they remain in the clearing accounts. The collection of interest on these clearing accounts is considered in our determination of the fee structure for clients and represents a portion of the payment for our services. This interest totaled $0.3 million, $0.8 million and $5.0 million for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively and is classified as payment service revenue in our consolidated statements of operations.

 

Professional services revenues consist of implementation fees associated with the linking of our financial institution clients to our service platforms through various networks, along with web development and hosting fees, training fees, communication services and sales of software licenses and related support. We provide access to our service platforms to the customer using a hosting model. The implementation and web hosting services are not considered separate deliverables. Revenues from web development, web hosting, training and communications services are recognized over the term of the contract as the services are provided.

 

When we provide services to the customer through the delivery of software, revenues from the sale of software licenses, services and related support are recognized when there is persuasive evidence that an arrangement exists, the fee is fixed or determinable, collectability is probable and the software has been delivered, provided that no significant obligations remain under the contract. We have multiple-element software arrangements that typically include support services, in addition to the delivery of software. For these arrangements, we recognize revenues using the residual method. Under the residual method, the fair value of the undelivered elements, based on vendor specific objective evidence of fair value, is deferred. The difference between the total arrangement fee and the amount deferred for the undelivered elements is recognized as revenues related to the delivered elements. We determine the fair value of the undelivered elements based on the amounts charged when those elements are sold separately. For sales of software that require significant

production, modification or customization, we recognize revenues using the percentage-of-completion method. The percentage-of-completion is measured based on the percentage of labor effort incurred to date to estimated total labor effort to complete delivery of the software license. Changes in estimates to complete and revisions in overall profit estimates on these contracts are charged to our consolidated statements of operations in the period in which they are determined. We record any estimated losses on contracts immediately upon determination. Revenues related to support services are recognized on a straight-line basis over the term of the support agreement.

 

Most contracts can be terminated by our clients within a specific period, typically thirty to sixty days following notice by the client. Our contracts contain termination fees which generally, at a minimum, cover our remaining incremental costs and deferred costs related to the contract. We have not historically incurred losses on terminated contracts.

 

Other revenues consist of service fees related to enhanced third-party solutions and termination fees. Service fees for enhanced third-party solutions include fully integrated bill payment and account retrieval services through Intuit’s Quicken, check ordering, inter-institution funds transfer, account aggregation and check imaging. Revenues from these service fees are recognized over the term of the contract as the services are provided. Termination fees are recognized upon termination of a contract.

 

Allowance for Doubtful Accounts.  The provision for losses on accounts receivable and allowance for doubtful accounts are recognized based on our estimate, which considers our historical loss experience, including the need to adjust for current conditions, and judgments about the probable effects of relevant observable data and financial health of specific customers. During the year ended December 31, 2010, we reserved an additional $132,000 of accounts receivable during the year to reflect a balance of $232,000 at year end. This represents management’s estimate of the probable losses in the accounts receivable balance at December 31, 2010. While the allowance for doubtful accounts and the provision for losses on accounts receivable depend to a large degree on future conditions, management does not forecast significant adverse developments in 2011.

 

Income Taxes.  Income taxes are accounted for under the asset and liability method. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on temporary differences between financial reporting and the tax bases of assets and liabilities. Deferred tax assets are also recognized for tax net operating loss carryforwards. These deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using the enacted tax rates and laws that are expected to be in effect when such amounts are expected to reverse or be utilized. The realization of deferred tax assets is contingent upon the generation of future taxable income during the carryforward period. Valuation allowances are provided to reduce such deferred tax assets to amounts more likely than not to be ultimately realized. The net operating loss carryforwards expire from 2021-2026. Management believes that the Company will generate sufficient taxable income over the next four years to recover the net operating loss carryforwards and it is more likely than not that they will recover net operating losses prior to their expiration.

 

In 2008, based on the positive taxable income trend in New Jersey and projected taxable income over the next five years, the Company reversed approximately $1.9 million of valuation allowance against state net operating loss carryforwards. This reversal resulted in recognition of an income tax benefit totaling $0.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2008. The remaining $1.7 million was related to valuation allowance established in purchase accounting and therefore resulted in a reduction of goodwill when reversed. In 2008, we established a deferred tax asset valuation of approximately $0.3 million related to realized and unrealized capital losses from our investment in the Columbia Strategic Cash Portfolio. In 2009, the investment was extinguished and a reversal of $0.1 million resulted in an income tax benefit of $0.03 million. Our estimates of future taxable income represent critical accounting estimates because such estimates are subject to change and a downward adjustment could have a significant impact on future earnings.

 

Cost of Internal Use Software and Computer Software to be Sold.  We capitalize the cost of computer software developed or obtained for internal use. Capitalized computer software costs consist primarily of payroll-related and consulting costs incurred during the development stage. We expense costs related to preliminary project assessments, research and development, re-engineering, training and application

maintenance as they are incurred. Capitalized software costs are being depreciated on a straight-line basis over an estimated useful life of three to seven years upon being placed in service.

 

We capitalize the cost of computer software to be sold. Software development costs are capitalized beginning when a product’s technological feasibility has been established by completion of a working model of the product and ending when a product is ready for general release to customers. We capitalized approximately $5.9 million of software development costs and amortized approximately $7.2 million of capitalized computer software for the year ended December 31, 2010.

 

Impairment of Goodwill, Intangible Assets and Long-Lived Assets.  We evaluate the recoverability of our identifiable intangible assets, goodwill and other long-lived assets. We assess the recoverability of our goodwill at least on an annual basis and when events or circumstances indicate a potential impairment. When assessing the recoverability of our goodwill, we use the income method to determine the fair value of our two reporting units, Banking and eCommerce, based upon our forecasted discounted cash flows. The estimates we use in evaluating goodwill are consistent with the plans and estimates that we use to manage our operations. We use undiscounted cash flows to assess the recoverability of our amortizable intangible and other long-lived assets, when events and circumstances indicate a potential impairment. The Company’s reporting units, Banking and eCommerce, have allocated goodwill of approximately $80.4 million and approximately $101.1 million, respectively, as of December 31, 2010.

 

We did not experience any impairment of goodwill or other intangible assets for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 or 2008. If market conditions continue to weaken, our revenue and cost forecasts may not be achieved and we may incur charges for goodwill impairment, which could be significant and could have a material negative effect on our results of operations. The Company’s stock price ranged from $3.58 to $5.45 during 2010. Were the stock price to decline below this range, it may require the Company to evaluate whether or not the decline in stock price indicated an impairment requiring reevaluation of the goodwill. The Company will continue to monitor its financial performance, stock price, and other factors in order to determine if there are any indicators of impairment.

 

The discounted cash flow approach we use for valuing goodwill involves estimating future cash flows expected to be generated from the related assets, discounted to their present value using a discount rate. Terminal values are also estimated and discounted to their present value.

 

We forecasted revenue, expenses, and cash flows over a five-year period for each of our reporting units. In projecting future cash flows, we considered factors including our historical growth rates and company-specific information such as forecasted sales and client retention. Based on these considerations, our assumed 2011 revenue growth rates were neutral followed by assumed revenue growth with an anticipated economic recovery in 2012. To arrive at our projected cash flows and resulting growth rates, we evaluated our historical operating results and current management initiatives to assess the reasonableness of our operating margin assumptions. We also calculated a “normalized” residual year which represents the perpetual cash flows of each reporting unit. The residual year cash flow was multiplied by market factors to estimate arrive at the terminal value of the reporting unit.

 

We also utilized the market approach to provide a test of reasonableness to the results of the discounted cash flow model. The market approach indicates the fair value of the invested capital of a business based on a company’s market capitalization and a comparison of the business to comparable publicly traded companies and transactions in its industry. One indication of the fair value of a business is the quoted market price in active markets for the equity of the business. The quoted market price of equity multiplied by the number of shares outstanding yields the fair value of the equity of a business on a marketable, noncontrolling basis. We then apply a premium for control and add the estimated fair value of interest-bearing debt to indicate the fair value of the invested capital of the business on a marketable, controlling basis.

 

While we believe we have made reasonable estimates and utilized appropriate assumptions to calculate the fair value of our reporting units, it is possible a material change could occur. If future results are not consistent with our assumptions and estimates, we may be exposed to impairment charges in the future.

The Company’s reporting units, Banking and eCommerce, have a carrying value of approximately $105.6 million and approximately $127.4 million, respectively, as of December 31, 2010. Banking and eCommerce have allocated goodwill of approximately $80.4 million and approximately $101.1 million, respectively, as of December 31, 2010. If the Company’s future revenue growth does not materialize, either because it fails to achieve sales forecasts or loses existing customers, or if it experiences changes in market factors such as discount rate or stock price, the fair value of one or both of the Company’s reporting units could be impacted. If the fair value for our Banking reporting unit declines approximately 28% from the December 31, 2010 fair value, or the fair value of our eCommerce reporting unit declines approximately 21% from the December 31, 2010 fair value, it is likely that we would incur goodwill impairment charges.

 

Theoretical Swap Derivative.  We bifurcated the fair market value of the embedded derivative associated with the Series A-1 Redeemable Convertible Preferred Stock (“Series A-1 Preferred Stock”) issued in conjunction with the Princeton eCom acquisition on July 3, 2006. We determined that the embedded derivative is defined as the right to receive a fixed rate of return on the accrued, but unpaid dividends and the variable negotiated rate, which creates a theoretical swap between the fixed rate of return on the accrued, but unpaid dividends and the variable rate actually accrued on the unpaid dividends. This embedded derivative is marked to market at the end of each reporting period through earnings and an adjustment to other assets. There is no active market quote available for the fair value of the embedded derivative. Thus, management measures fair value of the derivative by estimating future cash flows related to the asset using a forecasted iMoney Net First Tier rate based on the one-month LIBOR rate adjusted for the historical spread for the estimated period in which the Series A-1 Preferred Stock will be outstanding.

 

Management has to make significant estimates about the future cash flows related to the liability, the estimated period which the Series A-1 Preferred Stock will be outstanding and the appropriate discount rates commensurate with the risks involved. The fair value of this derivative fluctuates based on changes to interest rates. An increase to interest rates will decrease the fair value of the derivative. Changes to the fair value of the derivative are recorded in interest expense on the consolidated statement of operations.

 

Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities.  From time to time, we have entered into derivative instruments to serve as cash flow hedges for our debt instruments. The Company recognizes all of its derivative instruments as either assets or liabilities in the consolidated balance sheet at fair value. The accounting for changes in the fair value (i.e., gains or losses) of a derivative instrument depends on whether it has been designated and qualifies as part of a hedging relationship and further, on the type of hedging relationship. For those derivative instruments that are designated and qualify as hedging instruments, a company must designate the hedging instrument, based upon the exposure being hedged, as a fair value hedge, cash flow hedge or a hedge of a net investment in a foreign operation.

 

For derivative instruments that are designated and qualify as a cash flow hedge (i.e., hedging the exposure to variability in expected future cash flows that is attributable to a particular risk), the effective portion of the gain or loss on the derivative instrument is reported as a component of other comprehensive income or loss and reclassified into operations in the same line item associated with the forecasted transaction in the same period or periods during which the hedged transaction affects earnings (for example, in “interest expense” when the hedged transactions are interest cash flows associated with floating-rate debt). The remaining gain or loss on the derivative instrument in excess of the cumulative change in the present value of future cash flows of the hedged item, if any, is recognized in other income/expense in current operations during the period of change. Alternatively, a cash flow hedge is considered “perfectly effective” and the entire gain or loss on the derivative instrument is reported as a component of other comprehensive income or loss and reclassified into operations in the same line item associated with the forecasted transaction in the same period or periods during which the hedged transaction affects earnings. Derivatives are reported on the balance sheet in other current and long-term assets or other current and long-term liabilities based upon when the financial instrument is expected to mature. Accordingly, derivatives are included in the changes in other assets and liabilities in the operating activities section of the statement of cash flows. Alternatively, derivatives containing a financing element are reported as a financing activity in the statement of cash flows.

Stock-Based Compensation.  Compensation cost for all share-based payments granted are based on the grant-date estimated fair value. The fair value of each option granted is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. The assumptions used in this model are expected dividend yield, expected volatility, risk-free interest rate and expected term. The expected volatility for stock options is based on historical volatility.

 

Share-based compensation expense recognized in the Consolidated Statements of Operations is based on awards ultimately expected to vest, reduced for estimated forfeitures. The authoritative accounting pronouncement for share-based compensation expense requires forfeitures to be estimated at the time of grant and revised, if necessary, in subsequent periods if actual forfeitures differ from those estimates. Expected forfeitures were estimated based on our historical experience.

 

For the options based on performance, management must assess the probability of the achievement of the targets. If the targets are not probable of achievement, changes in the recognition of share-based compensation expense may occur. Management assesses the probability based on the Company’s actual and projected results of operations.

 

The underlying assumptions can change from time to time and, as a result, the compensation expense that we record in future periods may differ significantly from what we have recorded in the current period with respect to similar instruments.

 

Recently Issued Pronouncements.

 

In January of 2010, the FASB improved its disclosures for fair value measurements, requiring separate disclosures of transfers in and out of Level 1 and Level 2 fair value measurements along with the reason for the transfer. The new guidance also requires separately presenting the reconciliation for Level 3 fair value measurements purchases, sales, issuances and settlements and clarifies the disclosure regarding the level of disaggregation and input and valuation techniques. The guidance related to the Level 3 reconciliation will be effective January 1, 2011. The remaining guidance was adopted during the first quarter of 2010. Adoption of this guidance in the first quarter of 2010 did not materially impact the Company’s financial disclosures.

 

In October 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board, or FASB, changed its guidance for the accounting of certain revenue arrangements that include software elements. This authoritative guidance amends the scope of pre-existing software revenue guidance by removing from the guidance non-software components of tangible products and certain software components of tangible products. The Company adopted this authoritative guidance prospectively commencing in its first quarter of fiscal 2010. Adoption of this guidance in the first quarter of 2010 did not materially impact the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

 

In October 2009, the FASB changed its guidance for the accounting of multiple-deliverable revenue arrangements with customers. Current GAAP requires a vendor to use vendor-specific objective evidence or third-party evidence of selling price to separate deliverables in a multiple-deliverable arrangement. Multiple-deliverable arrangements will be separated in more circumstances with the updated guidance. The change in guidance establishes a selling price hierarchy for determining the selling price of a deliverable. The selling price used for each deliverable will be based on vendor-specific objective evidence if available, third-party evidence if vendor-specific objective evidence is not available, or estimated selling price if neither vendor-specific nor third-party evidence is available. The best estimate to use in determining a selling price is the price as if the item were sold on a stand alone basis. Changes also include eliminating the residual method of allocation and requiring that arrangement consideration be allocated at the inception of the arrangement to all deliverables using the relative selling price method, which allocates discounts in the arrangement proportionally to each deliverable based on each selling price. These changes become effective, prospectively, for the Company on January 1, 2011. The Company does not anticipate the adoption will have a material effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

Results of Operations

 

The following table presents the summarized results of operations for our two reportable segments, Banking and eCommerce (dollars in thousands):

 

 

 

 

Year Ended December 31, 2010 Compared to the Year Ended December 31, 2009

 

Revenues

 

We generate revenues from account presentation, payment, relationship management and professional services and other revenues. Revenues decreased by $2.4 million, or (2)%, to $149.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2010, from $151.9 million in 2009.

 

 

Notes:

 

Account Presentation Services.  Both the Banking and eCommerce segments contribute to account presentation services revenues, which increased 15%, or $1.2 million, to $9.4 million. The increase is due to net new clients of approximately $1.3 million and increased service to existing clients of approximately $0.6 million partially offset by reduced card usage fees of approximately $0.7 million.

 

Payment Services.  Both the Banking and eCommerce segments contribute to payment services revenues, which decreased to $113.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2010 from $118.3 million in the same period of the prior year. The decrease was related to declines in interest rates which reduced float interest revenue by approximately $0.5 million. Additionally, user and account maintenance fees decreased by approximately $4.9 million. This was offset by an increase in transaction and license fees of approximately $0.1 million.

 

Relationship Management Services.  Primarily composed of revenues from the Banking segment, relationship management services revenues increased 3%, or $0.2 million, to $8.4 million.

 

Professional Services and Other.  Both the Banking and eCommerce segments contribute to professional services and other revenues, which increased by $1.5 million, or 9%. Revenues from professional services and other fees increased due to increased implementation fees of approximately $0.2 million, increased license fees of approximately $0.6 million, increased professional service fees of $0.8 million, and increased users and transactions of approximately $0.5 million partially offset by reduced cancellation fees of approximately $0.6 million.

Costs and Expenses

 

 

 

Notes:

 

 

Costs of Revenues.  Costs of revenues encompass the direct expenses associated with providing our services. These expenses include telecommunications, payment processing, systems operations, customer service, implementation and professional services work. Costs of revenues increased by $1.7 million to $79.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2010, from $77.3 million for the same period in 2009. The increase is due to increased salaries and benefits of approximately $0.5 million, data communication costs of approximately $0.4 million, amortization of deferred costs of approximately $0.4 million, amortization of software costs of approximately $0.4 million and partner commissions of approximately $0.2 million offset by a decrease in amortization expense of intangible assets of approximately $0.3 million.

 

Gross Profit.  Gross profit decreased $4.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2010 to $70.6 million, and gross margin was 47% and 49% for the year ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. The decrease is due to a decrease in revenue of $2.3 million combined with an increase in cost of revenues of $1.7 million. As discussed above the margin decreased primarily due to an increase in fixed costs related to

labor, data communications, amortization of deferred costs and amortization of software costs partially offset by lower amortization costs related to intangible assets.

 

General and Administrative.  General and administrative expenses primarily consist of salaries for executive, administrative and financial personnel, consulting expenses and facilities costs such as office leases, insurance and depreciation. General and administrative expenses increased $1.0 million, or 3% to $32.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2010. The increase was due to increased salary and benefit expenses of approximately $1.5 million and increased legal and audit fees of $0.7 million offset by reduced repair and maintenance costs of approximately $0.9 million and client conference costs of approximately $0.2 million.

 

Sales and Marketing.  Sales and marketing expenses include salaries and commissions paid to sales and client services personnel and other costs incurred in selling our services and products. Sales and marketing expenses decreased $1.2 million, or 6%, to $19.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2010. The primary reason for the decrease are reduced amortization expense of $1.4 million related to our customer lists and partner commission of approximately $0.7 offset by increased salary and benefits expense of approximately $0.7 million and bad debt expense of $0.1 million.

 

Systems and Development.  Systems and development expenses include salaries, consulting fees and all other expenses incurred in supporting the development of new services and products and new technology to enhance existing products. Systems and development expenses increased by $0.5 million, or 5%, to $9.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2010. The increase is primarily due to increased consulting costs of approximately $0.9 million and salary and benefit costs of approximately $0.4 million offset by increased capitalizable costs of approximately $0.8 million.

 

Income from Operations.  Income from operations decreased $4.3 million, or 33%, to $9.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2010. The decrease was primarily due to lower revenues of $2.3 million, increased costs of revenues of $1.7 million, and increased operating expenses of $0.3 million in the current period.

 

Interest Income.  Interest income remained constant at $0.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2010.

 

Interest and Other Expense.  Interest and other expense decreased by $3.9 million due primarily to a net decrease in interest expense of approximately $2.7 million as a result of the expiration of the interest rate swap as a of December 31, 2009, and an increase in mark-to-market valuation related to the theoretical swap derivative of approximately $1.2 million.

 

Income Tax (Benefit) Provision.  Income tax expense was $3.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2010, a decrease of $0.7 million over the prior year. This decrease is primarily due to the decrease in taxable income in the current year and a decrease in our effective rate. Our effective tax rate was 38.8%. The difference between our effective tax rate and the federal statutory rate is primarily due to a stock based compensation adjustment of approximately $0.2 million relating to the difference between the expected deduction from stock based compensation which is based upon the fair value of the award at the date of issuance and the actual deduction taken which is based upon the fair value of the award at the time the award is exercised or vests.

 

Preferred Stock Accretion.  The accretion related to the Series A-1 Preferred Stock issued on July 3, 2006 increased as a result of higher interest costs related to the escalation accrual associated with the Series A-1 Preferred Stock.

 

Net Loss (Income) Available to Common Stockholders.  Net loss available to common stockholders increased $0.1 million to a net loss of $4.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2010, compared to net loss of $4.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2009. The increase is due to increased net income of approximately $0.2 million offset by increased preferred stock accretion of approximately $0.3 million. Basic and diluted net loss per share remained constant at $0.14 for the year ended December 31, 2010. Basic shares outstanding increased by 3% as a result of shares issued in connection with the exercise of company-issued stock options and our employees’ participation in our employee stock purchase plan.

Year Ended December 31, 2009 Compared to the Year Ended December 31, 2008

 

Revenues

 

We generate revenues from account presentation, payment, relationship management and professional services and other revenues. Revenues increased slightly by $0.2 million, or 0%, to $151.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2009, from $151.6 million in 2008.

 

 

Account Presentation Services.  Both the Banking and eCommerce segments contribute to account presentation services revenues, which increased 4%, or $0.3 million, to $8.2 million. The increase is due to net new clients of approximately $1.0 million offset by the departure of a card account presentation services client in April 2008 of approximately $0.7 million.

 

Payment Services.  Both the Banking and eCommerce segments contribute to payment services revenues, which decreased to $118.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2009 from $122.3 million in the same period of the prior year. The decrease was related to significant declines in interest rates which reduced float interest revenue by approximately $4.2 million. Additionally, user and license fees decreased by approximately $1.0 million. This was offset by an increase in transaction fees of approximately $1.2 million.

 

Relationship Management Services.  Primarily composed of revenues from the Banking segment, relationship management services revenues increased 1%, or $0.1 million, to $8.2 million.

 

Professional Services and Other.  Both the Banking and eCommerce segments contribute to professional services and other revenues, which increased by $3.8 million, or 29%. Revenues from professional services and other fees increased due to higher cancellation fees of approximately $1.1 million, increased implementation fees of approximately $1.2 million, increased professional service fees of $0.8 million, increased expedited payment fees of $0.2 million and increased users and transactions for our Money HQ, Quicken, and mobile banking products of approximately $0.7 million partially offset by reduced account opening fees of approximately $0.3 million.

Costs and Expenses

 

 

 

Notes:

 

 

Costs of Revenues.  Costs of revenues encompass the direct expenses associated with providing our services. These expenses include telecommunications, payment processing, systems operations, customer service, implementation and professional services work. Costs of revenues decreased by $0.1 million to $77.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2009, from $77.4 million for the same period in 2008. The decrease is due to reduced salaries and benefits of $0.7 million, consulting costs of $0.2 million and maintenance costs of $1.0 million offset by an increase in amortization expense of approximately $1.7 million.

 

Gross Profit.  Gross profit increased $0.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2009 to $74.6 million, and gross margin was 49% for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008. The increase is due to a slight increase in revenue combined with a slight decrease in cost of revenues.

 

General and Administrative.  General and administrative expenses primarily consist of salaries for executive, administrative and financial personnel, consulting expenses and facilities costs such as office leases, insurance and depreciation. General and administrative expenses decreased $2.3 million, or 7% to $31.1 million

for the year ended December 31, 2009. The decrease was due to the reduction of consulting and audit fees of $1.3 million, reduced salary and benefit expenses related to cost containment initiatives of approximately $0.8 million, reduced depreciation and amortization of approximately $0.6 million, and the change in estimated forfeitures of certain equity compensation awards of approximately $0.1 million, offset by costs incurred related to the proxy contest of approximately $0.8 million.

 

Sales and Marketing.  Sales and marketing expenses include salaries and commissions paid to sales and client services personnel and other costs incurred in selling our services and products. Sales and marketing expenses decreased $3.5 million, or 14%, to $20.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2009. The primary reason for the decrease are reduced amortization expense of $1.9 million related to our customer lists and reduced partnership commissions of approximately $1.2 million.

 

Systems and Development.  Systems and development expenses include salaries, consulting fees and all other expenses incurred in supporting the development of new services and products and new technology to enhance existing products. Systems and development expenses decreased by $0.5 million, or 5%, to $9.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2009. The decrease is primarily due to higher capitalized costs of approximately $0.7 million, decreased communication costs of approximately $0.1 million, decreased repair and maintenance of approximately $0.1 million offset by increased consulting costs of approximately $0.2 million and increased amortization costs of approximately $0.2 million.

 

Income from Operations.  Income from operations increased $6.6 million, or 98%, to $13.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2009. The increase was primarily due to lower operating expenses in the current period.

 

Interest Income.  Interest income decreased $0.4 million to $0.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2009 due to lower average interest rates.

 

Interest and Other Expense.  Interest and other expense remained constant at $4.2 million due primarily to a mark-to-market valuation of the ITS put valuation in 2008 of approximately $1.7 million expense, a decrease in interest expense of approximately $1.2 million, and an increase to other income of approximately $0.6 million offset by a decrease mark-to-market valuation related to the theoretical swap derivative of approximately $3.5 million.

 

Income Tax (Benefit) Provision.  Income tax expense was $4.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2009, an increase of $3.0 million over the prior year. This increase is primarily due to the increase in taxable income in the current year. Our effective tax rate was 44.63%. The difference between our effective tax rate and the federal statutory rate is primarily due to a stock based compensation adjustment of approximately $0.9 million relating to the difference between the expected deduction from stock based compensation which is based upon the fair value of the award at the date of issuance and the actual deduction taken which is based upon the fair value of the award at the time the award is exercised or vests.

 

Preferred Stock Accretion.  The accretion related to the Series A-1 Preferred Stock issued on July 3, 2006 increased as a result of higher interest costs related to the escalation accrual associated with the Series A-1 Preferred Stock.

 

Net Loss (Income) Available to Common Stockholders.  Net loss available to common stockholders decreased $2.9 million to a net loss of $4.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2009, compared to net loss of $7.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2008. The decrease is due reduced operating expenses of approximately $6.3 million offset by increased tax expense of approximately $3.0 million. Basic and diluted net loss per share was $0.14 for the year ended December 31, 2009, compared to basic and diluted net loss per share of $0.24 for the year ended December 31, 2008. Basic shares outstanding increased by 3% as a result of shares issued in connection with the exercise of company-issued stock options and our employees’ participation in our employee stock purchase plan.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

 

Net cash provided by operating activities was $29.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2010. This represented a $3.3 million decrease in cash provided by operating activities compared to prior year. The decrease is primarily due to an decrease in equity compensation expense of $1.3 million, a decrease in depreciation and amortization of $1.2 and a change in fair value of theoretical swap derivative of $1.2 million offset by an increase in net income of $0.2 million and an increase in provision for losses on account receivable of $0.1 million.

 

Net cash used by investing activities for the year ended December 31, 2010 was $12.7 million, which was the result of capital expenditures.

 

Net cash used by financing activities was $10.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2010, which was primarily the result of principal payments on our 2007 Notes of $12.0 million offset by $1.1 million in payments received from stock option exercises.

 

In December 2007, we reclassified our investment (“investment”) in the Columbia Strategic Cash Portfolio Fund (the “Fund”) from cash and cash equivalents to short-term investments. The Fund was short-term and highly liquid in nature prior to the fourth quarter of 2007 and was classified as a cash equivalent. During the fourth quarter of 2007, the Fund was closed by the Fund administrator to future investment, partially due to the subprime credit market crisis, and began liquidating the Fund in an orderly manner. The Funds were then converted to a net asset value basis and marked to market daily. The fund was liquidated in 2009. The value of the investment was $0.0 million and $0.0 million at December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. We adjusted the investment in the Fund to its estimated fair value at December 31, 2008. In addition, we received $0 and $2.1 million in liquidation payments from the Fund administrator during the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively and recorded a gain of $0.1 million during the year ended December 31, 2009.

 

During the fourth quarter of 2008, certain Company management elected to receive approximately 160,000 shares of restricted stock units that vested ratably each month of the fourth quarter of 2008, in lieu of cash compensation. In addition, certain members on our Board of Directors elected to receive approximately 23,500 shares of restricted stock units that vested ratably in each month of the fourth quarter of 2008, in lieu of cash compensation.

 

Our material commitments under operating and capital leases and purchase obligations are as follows (in thousands):

 

 

 

 

The estimated interest payments related to the 2007 Notes are, $0.8 million and less than $0.1 million for 2011 and 2012, respectively. The estimated interest payments for years 2011 through 2012 were calculated based on the one- month LIBOR rate on December 31, 2010 of 0.26%. If the interest rates changed 1% the impact to estimated interest payments would be $1.1 million, and $0.1 million in 2011, and 2012, respectively.

 

Given continuing economic uncertainty and interest rate volatility, we could experience unforeseeable impacts on our results of operations, cash flows, ability to meet debt and other contractual requirements, and other items in future periods. While there can be no guarantees as to outcome, we have developed a contingency plan to address the negative effects of these uncertainties, if they occur. Our debt facility matures

in February, 2012 and we believe our existing cash and cash equivalents and cash from operations will be sufficient to cover future commitments.

 

Future capital requirements will depend upon many factors, including our need to finance any future acquisitions, the timing of research and product development efforts and the expansion of our marketing effort.

 

We expect to continue to expend significant amounts on expansion of facility infrastructure, ongoing research and development, computer and related equipment, and personnel.

 

We believe that cash on hand, investments and the cash we expect to generate from operations will be sufficient to meet our current anticipated cash requirements for at least the next twelve months. There can be no assurance that additional capital beyond the amounts currently forecasted by us will not be required or that any such required additional capital will be available on reasonable terms, if at all, at such time as required.

 

On January 21, 2011 the Company announced that its Board of Directors was evaluating unsolicited expressions of interest in potential business combinations that it had received from third parties. After careful consideration, on March 15, 2011 the Company’s Board of Directors announced it had terminated its evaluation of potential business combinations and is not actively pursuing alternatives to the Company’s long-term growth plan.

 

 

We invest primarily in short-term, investment grade, marketable government, corporate, and mortgage-backed debt securities. Our interest income is most sensitive to changes in the general level of U.S. interest rates and given the short-term nature of our investments, our exposure to interest rate risk is not material. We do not have operations subject to risks of foreign currency fluctuations, nor do we use derivative financial instruments in our investment portfolio.

 

In 2010, we are exposed to the impact of interest rate changes as they affect our outstanding senior secured notes, or 2007 Notes. The interest rate on our 2007 Notes varies based on LIBOR and, consequently, our interest expense could fluctuate with changes in the LIBOR rate through the maturity date of the senior secured note.

 

The Company performed a sensitivity analysis on the weighted average balances of the outstanding 2007 notes. If the LIBOR rate increased or decreased by one percent as of December 31, 2010, interest expense would have increased or decreased by approximately $0.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2010.

 

We earn interest (float interest) in clearing accounts that hold funds collected from end-users until they are disbursed to receiving merchants or financial institutions. The float interest we earn on these clearing accounts is considered in our determination of the fee structure for clients and represents a portion of the payment for our services. As such, the float interest earned is classified as payment services revenue in our consolidated statements of operations. This float interest revenue is exposed to changes in the general level of U.S. interest rates as it relates to the balances of these clearing accounts. The float interest totaled $0.3 million and $0.8 million for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. If there was a change in interest rates of one percent for the year ended December 31, 2010, revenues associated with float interest would have increased by approximately $1.9 million or decreased by approximately $0.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2010.

 

The Company’s investment in the Columbia Strategic Cash Portfolio (the “Fund”) was liquidated in September 2009. The value of the investment was $0.0 and $2.0 million at December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively. During the year ended December 31, 2009, the Company received $2.1 million in liquidation payments from the Fund administrator and recognized a gain of $0.1 million. During the year ended December 31, 2008, the Company received $6.6 million in liquidation payments from the Fund administrator and recognized a loss of $0.5 million related to the payments.

 

 

 

 

The Board of Directors and Stockholders

Online Resources Corporation:

 

We have audited Online Resources Corporation’s (the Company) internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2010, based on criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.

 

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audit also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

 

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

 

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

 

In our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2010, based on criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.

 

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheets of the Company and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2010 and 2009, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2010, and our report dated March 15, 2011 expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements.

 

 

McLean, Virginia

March 15, 2011

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

 

The Board of Directors and Stockholders

Online Resources Corporation:

 

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Online Resources Corporation and subsidiaries (the Company) as of December 31, 2010 and 2009, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three year period ended December 31, 2010. In connection with our audit of the consolidated financial statements, we have also audited financial statement schedule II for the three years ended December 31, 2010, 2009, and 2008. These consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements and the financial statement schedule based on our audits.

 

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

 

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Online Resources Corporation and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2010 and 2009, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2010, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Also in our opinion, the related financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic consolidated financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein.

 

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2010, based on criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO), and our report dated March 15, 2011, expressed an unqualified opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

 

McLean, Virginia

March 15, 2011

ONLINE RESOURCES CORPORATION

 

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(in thousands, except par value amounts)

 

 

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

ONLINE RESOURCES CORPORATION

 

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(in thousands, except per share amounts)