GCI, LLC - FORM 10-K - March 14, 2011

Attached files

file	filename
EX-21.1 - EXHIBIT 21.1 - GCI, LLC	exhibit21-1.htm
EX-31.1 - EXHIBIT 31.1 - GCI, LLC	exhibit31-1.htm
EX-32.2 - EXHIBIT 32.2 - GCI, LLC	exhibit32-2.htm
EX-32.1 - EXHIBIT 32.1 - GCI, LLC	exhibit32-1.htm
EX-31.2 - EXHIBIT 31.2 - GCI, LLC	exhibit31-2.htm
EX-10.180 - EXHIBIT 10.180 - GCI, LLC	exhibit10-180.htm
EX-10.181 - EXHIBIT 10.181 - GCI, LLC	exhibit10-181.htm
EX-10.178 - EXHIBIT 10.178 - GCI, LLC	exhibit10-178.htm
EX-10.188 - EXHIBIT 10.188 - GCI, LLC	exhibit10-188.htm
EX-10.183 - EXHIBIT 10.183 - GCI, LLC	exhibit10-183.htm
EX-10.184 - EXHIBIT 10.184 - GCI, LLC	exhibit10-184.htm
EX-10.182 - EXHIBIT 10.182 - GCI, LLC	exhibit10-182.htm
EX-10.186 - EXHIBIT 10.186 - GCI, LLC	exhibit10-186.htm
EX-10.187 - EXHIBIT 10.187 - GCI, LLC	exhibit10-187.htm
EX-10.179 - EXHIBIT 10.179 - GCI, LLC	exhibit10-179.htm

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

x ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 or 15(d) OF THE

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010

o TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 or 15(d) OF THE

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from to

Commission File No. 0-5890

	GCI, INC.
	(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

	State of Alaska		91-1820757
	(State or other jurisdiction of		(I.R.S Employer
	incorporation or organization)		Identification No.)

	2550 Denali Street
	Suite 1000
	Anchorage, Alaska		99503
	(Address of principal executive offices)		(Zip Code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (907) 868-5600

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Exchange Act: None

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Exchange Act: None

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.

Yes o No x

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Securities Act.

Yes o No x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Yes x No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (section 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).

Yes o No o

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (section 229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” "accelerated filer" and "smaller reporting company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer o	Accelerated filero
Non-accelerated filer x (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)	Smaller reporting company o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes o No x

THE REGISTRANT MEETS THE CONDITIONS SET FORTH IN GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS I(1)(a) AND (b) OF FORM 10-K AND IS THEREFORE FILING THIS FORM WITH THE REDUCED DISCLOSURE FORMAT.

GCI, INC.

A WHOLLY-OWNED SUBSIDIARY OF GENERAL COMMUNICATION, INC.

2010 ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K

TABLE OF CONTENTS

			Page No.

Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Statements			4

Part I
	Item I.	Business	4
	Item IA.	Risk Factors	27
	Item IB.	Unresolved Staff Comments	33
	Item 2.	Properties	33
	Item 3.	Legal Proceedings	34
	Item 4.	Omitted per General Instruction I(1)(a) and (b) of Form 10-K	34

Part	II
	Item 5.	Market for the Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities	34
	Item 6.	Selected Financial Data	35
	Item 7.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	35
	Item 7A.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	60
	Item 8.	Consolidated Financial Statements and Supplementary Data	60
	Item 9.	Changes In and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure	60
	Item 9A.	Controls and Procedures	60
	Item 9B.	Other Information	62

Part III
	Items 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14 are omitted per General Instruction I(1)(a) and (b) of Form 10-K		62

Part IV
Item 15. Exhibits, Consolidated Financial Statement Schedules			63

SIGNATURES			117

This Annual Report on Form 10-K is for the year ending December 31, 2010. This Annual Report modifies and supersedes documents filed prior to this Annual Report. The Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) allows us to “incorporate by reference” information that we file with them, which means that we can disclose important information to you by referring you directly to those documents. Information incorporated by reference is considered to be part of this Annual Report. In addition, information that we file with the SEC in the future will automatically update and supersede information contained in this Annual Report.

Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Statements

You should carefully review the information contained in this Annual Report, but should particularly consider any risk factors that we set forth in this Annual Report and in other reports or documents that we file from time to time with the SEC. In this Annual Report, in addition to historical information, we state our future strategies, plans, objectives or goals and our beliefs of future events and of our future operating results, financial position and cash flows. In some cases, you can identify those so-called “forward-looking statements” by words such as “may,” “will,” “should,” “expects,” “plans,” “anticipates,” “believes,” “estimates,” “predicts,” “potential,” “project,” or “continue” or the negative of those words and other comparable words. All forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other important factors that may cause our actual results, performance, achievements, plans and objectives to differ materially from any future results, performance, achievements, plans and objectives expressed or implied by these forward-looking statements. In evaluating those statements, you should specifically consider various factors, including those identified under “Risk Factors,” and elsewhere in this Annual Report. Those factors may cause our actual results to differ materially from any of our forward-looking statements. For these forward-looking statements, we claim the protection of the safe harbor for forward-looking statements provided by the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995.

You should not place undue reliance on any such forward-looking statements. Further, any forward-looking statement, and the related risks, uncertainties and other factors speak only as of the date on which they were originally made and we expressly disclaim any obligation or undertaking to update or revise any forward-looking statement to reflect any change in our expectations with regard to these statements or any other change in events, conditions or circumstances on which any such statement is based. New factors emerge from time to time, and it is not possible for us to predict what factors will arise or when. In addition, we cannot assess the impact of each factor on our business or the extent to which any factor, or combination of factors, may cause actual results to differ materially from those contained in any forward-looking statements.

Part I

Item 1. Business

General

In this Annual Report, “we,” “us,” “our,” and “the Company” refer to GCI, Inc. and its direct and indirect subsidiaries.

GCI, Inc. was incorporated in 1997 to effect the issuance of Senior Notes as further described in note 6 to the accompanying "Consolidated Financial Statements" included in Part II of this Report. GCI, Inc. as a wholly owned subsidiary of General Communication, Inc. ("GCI"), received through its initial capitalization all ownership interests in subsidiaries previously held by GCI, GCI was incorporated in 1979 under the laws of the State of Alaska and has its principal executive offices at 2550 Denali Street, Suite 1000, Anchorage, AK 99503-2781 (telephone number 907-868-5600).

GCI, Inc. is primarily a holding company and together with its direct and indirect subsidiaries, is a diversified communications provider in the State of Alaska.

Availability of Reports and Other Information

Internet users can access information about the Company and its services at http://www.gci.com/, http://www.gci-industrialtelecom.com, http://www.unicom-alaska.com/, http://www.alaska-wireless.com/ and http://www.alaskaunited.com/. The Company hosts Internet services at http://www.gci.net/, broadband delivery of health services at http://www.connectmd.com, and SchoolAccess® services at http://www.schoolaccess.net/. The Company hosts information about our TERRA-Southwest (“TERRA-SW”) project at http://terra.gci.com/.

We make available on the http://www.gci.com/ website, free of charge, access to our Annual Report on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K, GCI’s Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A and amendments to those materials filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 as soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically submit

such material to the SEC. In addition, the SEC’s website is http://www.sec.gov/. The SEC makes available on this website, free of charge, reports, proxy and information statements, and other information regarding issuers, such as us, that file electronically with the SEC. Information on our websites or the SEC’s website is not part of this document.

Financial Information about Industry Segments

Our five reportable segments are Consumer, Network Access, Commercial, Managed Broadband, and Regulated Operations.

For financial information about our reportable segments, see “Part II — Item 7 — Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.” Also refer to note 10 included in “Part II — Item 8 — Consolidated Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.”

Narrative Description of our Business

General

We are the largest communications provider in Alaska as measured by revenues. We offer facilities-based local and long-distance voice services, cable television, data and Internet access to residential and business customers across the state under our GCI brand. In addition, we provide wireless telephone services over our own facilities under the GCI and Alaska Wireless brand names. Due to the unique nature of the markets we serve, including harsh winter weather and remote geographies, our customers rely extensively on our systems to meet their communication and entertainment needs. We benefit from the attractive demographic and economic characteristics of Alaska.

Since GCI’s founding in 1979 as a competitive long distance provider, we have consistently expanded our product portfolio and facilities to become the leading integrated communication services provider in our markets. Our facilities include redundant and geographically diverse digital undersea fiber optic cable systems linking our Alaska terrestrial networks to the networks of other carriers in the lower 48 contiguous states. As of December 31, 2010, our cable systems passed 84% of Alaska’s households, and we have achieved 55% basic cable penetration of the homes we reach. We believe we offer superior video services relative to digital broadcast satellite (“DBS”), which is limited by Alaska’s geographic location, challenging climate and terrain features. We have continued our statewide deployment of digital local phone service (“DLPS”) utilizing our own coaxial cable facilities enabling us to move off of facilities that we previously leased from incumbent local exchange carriers (“ILEC”). At December 31, 2010, 76% of the local access lines we served were carried on our own last mile facilities. In recent years, we expanded our efforts in wireless and presently operate the only statewide wireless network. Our network provides access for both global system for mobile communications (“GSM”) and code division multiple access (“CDMA”) based devices, and can provide us with an eventual path to fourth generation Long Term Evolution (“LTE”) based wireless communications.

Our Consumer segment serves residential customers. Our Network Access segment serves other common carriers. Our Commercial segment serves small businesses, local, national and global businesses, governmental entities, and public and private educational institutions. Our Managed Broadband segment serves rural school districts, hospitals and health clinics. The financial results of the long-distance, local access and Internet services sold to consumer and commercial customers that we serve in the Bethel, Alaska area are reported in the Regulated Operations segment.

For the year ended December 31, 2010, we generated consolidated revenues of $651.3 million. We ended the period with approximately 97,500 long-distance customers, 144,800 local access lines in service, 147,100 basic cable subscribers, 138,700 wireless subscribers and 116,900 cable modem subscribers.

Development of our Business During the Past Fiscal Year

TERRA-SW Project. In January 2010 the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s Rural Utilities Service (“RUS”) approved our wholly-owned subsidiary, United Utilities, Inc.’s (“UUI”) application for an $88.2 million loan/grant combination to extend terrestrial broadband service for the first time to Bristol Bay and the Yukon-Kuskokwim Delta, an area in Alaska roughly the size of the state of North Dakota. Upon completion TERRA-SW will be able to serve over 9,000 households and over 700 businesses in the 65 covered communities. The project will also be able to serve numerous public/non-profit/private community anchor

institutions and entities, such as regional health care providers, school districts, and other regional and Alaska Native organizations. The RUS award, consisting of a $44.2 million loan and a $44.0 million grant, will be made under the RUS Broadband Initiatives Program established pursuant to the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act. The grant portion of the award will fund backbone network facilities that we would not otherwise be able to construct within our return-on-investment requirements. UUI began construction on TERRA-SW in 2010 and expects to complete the project in 2012 or earlier if possible.

You should see “Part I — Item 1. Business — Regulation” for regulatory developments.

Business Strategy

We intend to continue to increase revenues using the following strategies:

Offer Bundled Products. We offer innovative service bundles to meet the needs of our consumer and commercial customers. We believe that bundling our services significantly improves customer retention, increases revenue per customer and reduces customer acquisition expenses. Our experience indicates that our bundled customers are significantly less likely to churn, and we experience less price erosion when we effectively combine our offerings. Bundling improves our top line revenue growth, provides operating cost efficiencies that expand our margins and drives our overall business performance. As a measure of success to date, over 62,600 of our residential customers subscribe to one of our service bundles that include two or more services.

Maximize Sales Opportunities. We successfully sell new and enhanced services and products between and within our business segments to our existing customer base to achieve increased revenues and penetration of our services. Through close coordination of our customer service and sales and marketing efforts, our customer service representatives suggest to our customers other services they can purchase or enhanced versions of services they already purchase. Many calls into our customer service centers or visits into one of our 32 retail stores result in sales of additional services and products.

Deliver Industry Leading Customer Service. We have positioned ourselves as a customer service leader in the Alaska communications market. We have organized our operations to effectively focus on our customers. We operate our own customer service department and maintain and staff our own call centers. We have empowered our customer service representatives to handle most service issues and questions on a single call. We prioritize our customer services to expedite handling of our most valuable customers’ issues, particularly for our largest commercial customers. We believe our integrated approach to customer service, including service set-up, programming various network databases with the customer’s information, installation, and ongoing service, allows us to provide a customer experience that fosters customer loyalty.

Leverage Communications Operations. We continue to expand and evolve our integrated network for the delivery of our services. Our bundled strategy and integrated approach to serving our customers creates efficiencies of scale and maximizes network utilization. By offering multiple services, we are better able to leverage our network assets and increase returns on our invested capital. We periodically evaluate our network assets and continually monitor technological developments that we can potentially deploy to increase network efficiency and performance.

Expand Our Product Portfolio and Footprint in Alaska. Throughout our history, we have successfully added and expect to continue to add new products to our product portfolio. We have a demonstrated history of new product evaluation, development and deployment for our customers, and we continue to assess revenue-enhancing opportunities that create value for our customers. In addition to new services such as additional high definition television ("HDTV") channels, video-on-demand, on-line advertising placement, on-line content delivery such as streaming music, and mobile high speed data, we are also expanding the reach of our core products to new markets. Where feasible and where economic analysis supports geographic expansion of our network coverage, we are currently pursuing or expect to pursue opportunities to increase the scale of our facilities, enhance our ability to serve our existing customers’ needs and attract new customers.

Make Strategic Acquisitions. We have a history of making and integrating acquisitions of in-state telecommunications providers. In 2008, we completed three acquisitions of telecommunications providers in various Alaska communities. Our management team is adept at sourcing, acquiring and integrating these acquired companies, and we will continue to actively pursue and buy companies that we believe fit with our strategy and networks and that enhance earnings.

Description of our Business by Reportable Segment

Overview

Our five reportable segments are Consumer, Network Access, Commercial, Managed Broadband, and Regulated Operations. Our reportable segments are business units that offer different products, are each managed separately, and serve distinct types of customers.

Following are our segments and the services and products each offers to its customers:

		Reportable Segments
Services and Products		Consumer	Network Access	Commercial	Managed Broadband	Regulated Operations
Voice:
	Long-distance	X	X	X		X
	Local Access	X	X	X		X

Video		X		X

Data:
	Internet	X	X	X	X	X
	Data Networks		X	X	X
	Managed Services			X	X
	Managed Broadband Services				X

Wireless		X	X	X

Many of our networks and facilities are utilized by more than one segment to provide services and products to our customers. The following description of our business by reportable segment includes a comprehensive discussion within the Consumer segment section with references to that section if such common network and facility use exists in another segment. Similarly, many of the same services and products are sold to our customers in different segments.

The following discussion includes information about significant services and products, sales and marketing, facilities, competition and seasonality for each of our five reportable segments. For a discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations please see “Part II – Item 7 – Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.”

Consumer Segment

Consumer segment revenues for 2010, 2009 and 2008 are summarized as follows (amounts in thousands):

	Year Ended December 31,
	2010		2009		2008
Total Consumer segment revenues1	$	342,898		294,925		255,632

1 See “Part II — Item 7 — Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and note 10 included in “Part II — Item 8 — Consolidated Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” for more information regarding the financial performance of our Consumer segment.

Services and Products

Our Consumer segment offers a full range of voice, video, data and wireless services and products to residential customers.

Voice Services and Products

Revenues derived from Consumer segment voice services and products in 2010, 2009, and 2008 totaled $57.3 million, $52.7 million, and $47.0 million, respectively, or 9%, 9%, and 8% of our total revenues, respectively.

Long-Distance

We are a full-service long-distance provider including intrastate, interstate and international calling. The value of our long-distance services is generally designed to be equal to or greater than that for comparable services provided by our competitors.

Local Access

We offer local access services in many communities and areas in Alaska, including the state’s five largest population centers, Anchorage, Fairbanks, the Matanuska-Susitna Valley, the Kenai Peninsula, and Juneau. Our own DLPS facilities and collocated remote facilities that access the ILEC unbundled network element ("UNE") loops allow us to offer full featured local service products to customers. In areas where we do not have our own DLPS facilities or access to ILEC UNE loop facilities, we offer service using total service resale of the ILEC’s local service or UNE platform.

Video Services and Products

Revenues derived from Consumer segment video services and products in 2010, 2009, and 2008 totaled $118.5 million, $111.0 million, and $105.2 million, respectively, or 18%, 19%, and 18% of our total revenues, respectively.

Our cable television systems serve 41 communities and areas in Alaska, including the state’s five largest population centers, Anchorage, Fairbanks, the Matanuska-Susitna Valley, the Kenai Peninsula, and Juneau.

We offer a full range of video services over our broadband cable systems. Our video service offerings include the following:

Basic cable. Our basic cable service consists of digital basic service with access to between 13 and 21 channels of programming and an expanded digital basic service with access to between 40 and 102 additional channels of programming. These services generally consist of programming provided by national and local broadcast networks, national and regional cable networks, and governmental and public access programming. We transmit an entirely digital signal for all cable television channels in all markets we serve.

High-definition television. Our high definition television ("HDTV") service provides our subscribers with improved, high-resolution picture quality, improved audio quality and a wide-screen, theater-like display. Our HDTV service offers a broad selection of high-definition programming with access of up to 82 high-definition channels including most major broadcast networks, leading national cable networks, premium channels and national sports networks.

Digital video recorder. Our advanced digital video recorder ("DVR") service lets digital cable subscribers select, record and store programs and play them at whatever time is convenient. DVR service also provides the ability to pause and rewind “live” television.

Premium channel programming. Our premium channel programming service, which includes cable networks such as Home Box Office, Showtime, Starz and Cinemax, generally offers, without commercial interruption, feature motion pictures, live and taped sporting events, concerts and other special features.

Video on demand. Our video on demand service permits our cable subscribers to order at their convenience and for a separate fee, individual feature motion pictures and special event programs, on an unedited, commercial-free basis.

Pay-per-view programming. Our pay-per-view service permits our cable subscribers to order, for a separate fee, scheduled individual feature motion pictures and special event programs, such as professional boxing, professional wrestling and concerts, on an unedited, commercial-free basis.

Data Services and Products

Revenues derived from Consumer segment data services and products in 2010, 2009, and 2008 totaled $61.4 million, $50.3 million, and $42.7 million, respectively, or 9%, 8%, and 7% of our total revenues, respectively.

Internet

We primarily offer four types of Internet access for consumer use: high-speed cable modem, dial-up, mobile wireless and fixed wireless. Value-added Internet features, such as e-mail virus prevention, personal web site and domain hosting, and additional e-mail accounts, are available for additional charges. Our consumer high-speed cable modem Internet service offers up to 22 Mbps download and 2 Mbps upload speeds.

Wireless Services and Products

Revenues derived from Consumer segment wireless services and products in 2010, 2009, and 2008 totaled $105.7 million, $81.0 million, and $60.7 million, respectively, or 16%, 14%, and 11% of our total revenues, respectively.

We offer mobile wireless voice and data services by selling services over our own facilities under the GCI and Alaska Wireless brand names. We offer fixed wireless local access services over our own facilities, have purchased personal communication services ("PCS") and local multipoint distribution system ("LMDS") wireless broadband licenses in Federal Communications Commission ("FCC") auctions covering markets in Alaska, and secured cellular licenses utilizing the FCC’s established process. We offer mobile wireless service to our customers in the state’s five largest population centers, Anchorage, Fairbanks, the Matanuska-Susitna Valley, the Kenai Peninsula, and Juneau and many other small Alaska communities.

We offer our customers a variety of post-paid and prepaid wireless rate plans so they can choose the plan that best fits their expected calling needs. Consumer voice service is generally offered on a contract basis for one or two year periods. Under the terms of these contracts, service is billed and provided on a monthly basis according to the applicable rate plan chosen. Our offerings include regional and national rate plans at a variety of pricing tiers. Our wireless voice plans generally combine a fixed monthly access charge, a designated number of minutes-of-use, per minute usage charges for minutes in excess of the included amount and additional charges for certain custom-calling features. Most of our plans include basic features such as voice messaging, caller ID, call forwarding and call waiting, and two-way text messaging. Wireless data service is included in certain plans or can be purchased as a feature to a plan.

We sell a variety of handsets and personal computer wireless data cards manufactured by various suppliers for use with our wireless services. We also sell accessories, such as carrying cases, hands-free devices, batteries, battery chargers and other items. We provide contract subscribers substantial equipment subsidies to initiate, continue or upgrade service.

Bundled Services and Products

We combine one or more of our individual service and product offerings into bundles that we sell to our Consumer segment customers at attractive prices. Our most popular bundled offering includes long-distance, cable television, cable modem Internet access and local access services. In addition to several other bundled offerings, we also offer a bundle of wireless services, cable television and cable modem Internet access.

Sales and Marketing

Our Consumer segment sales efforts are primarily directed toward increasing the number of subscribers we serve, selling bundled services, and generating incremental revenues through product and feature up-sell opportunities.

Facilities

We operate a modern, competitive communications network employing digital transmission technology over our fiber optic facilities within Alaska and between Alaska and the lower 48 states. Our facilities include three self-constructed digital undersea fiber optic cable systems linking our Alaska terrestrial networks to the networks of other carriers in the lower 48 states:

·	Alaska United East was placed into service in 1999 and connects Whittier, Valdez and Juneau, Alaska and Seattle, Washington,

·	Alaska United West was placed into service in 2004 and connects Seward, Alaska to Warrenton, Oregon, and

·	Alaska United Southeast was placed into service in 2008 and connects Ketchikan, Wrangell, Petersburg, Angoon and Sitka, Alaska to Alaska United West and Alaska United East.

The combination of our Alaska United East, Alaska United West and Alaska United Southeast systems provides us with the ability to provide fully protected geographically diverse routing of service between Alaska and the lower 48 states.

Our Alaska United Northwest self-constructed terrestrial fiber optic cable system connects Anchorage and Fairbanks, Alaska along the Parks Highway corridor and we own a terrestrial fiber optic cable system that extends from Prudhoe Bay, Alaska to Valdez, Alaska via Fairbanks, Alaska.

We have indefeasible rights to use ("IRU") capacity in the Kodiak-Kenai Cable Company, LLC’s undersea fiber optic cable system linking Anchorage to Kenai, Homer, Kodiak, Narrow Cape on Kodiak Island, and Seward, Alaska.

Another carrier operates a pair of fiber optic cable facilities connecting points in Alaska to the lower 48 states. This additional fiber system provides direct competition to services we provide on our owned fiber optic cable facilities.

We serve many rural and remote Alaska locations solely via satellite communications. Each of our C-band and Ku-band satellite transponders is backed up on the same spacecraft with multiple backup transponders. The primary spacecrafts we use to provide voice, data and Internet services to our rural Alaska customers are Intelsat’s Galaxy 18 for C-band and Intelsat's Horizons 1 for Ku-band, but we also lease capacity on two other spacecraft, SES Americom’s AMC-7 and AMC-8.

We also lease one 36 MHz transponder on SES Americom's AMC-7 spacecraft. We use this transponder to distribute multi-channel, digitally encoded video programming and services to remote locations within Alaska. We may use this transponder along with two others that we reserve on AMC-7 to restore service during any fiber outage that may occur in our network.

We operate digital microwave systems to link Anchorage with the Kenai Peninsula, our Prudhoe Bay Earth Station with Deadhorse, Alaska, and to link Bethel, Alaska with 40 rural communities. Virtually all switched services are computer controlled, digitally switched, and interconnected by a packet switched SS7 signaling network.

Other facilities include major earth stations at Adak, Barrow, Bethel, Cordova, Dillingham, Dutch Harbor, Eagle River, Galena, Juneau, Ketchikan, King Salmon, Kodiak, Kotzebue, McGrath, Nome, Prudhoe Bay, Sitka, Unalakleet, and Yakutat, all in Alaska, serving the communities in their vicinity, and at Issaquah, Washington, which provides interconnection to Seattle and the lower 48 states for traffic to and from major Alaska earth stations. The Eagle River earth station is linked to the Anchorage distribution center by fiber optic facilities.

We use a synchronous optical network ("SONET") as a service delivery method for our terrestrial metropolitan area networks and long-haul terrestrial and undersea fiber optic cable systems.

A fiber optic cable system from our Anchorage distribution center connects to the Matanuska Telephone Association (“MTA”), Eagle River central office and to our major hub earth station in Eagle River. The Issaquah earth station is connected with the Seattle distribution center by means of diversely-routed leased fiber optic cable transmission systems, each having the capability to restore the other in the event of failure. The Juneau earth station and distribution centers are collocated. We have digital microwave facilities serving the Kenai Peninsula communities. We maintain earth stations in Fairbanks (linked by digital microwave to the Fairbanks distribution center), Juneau (collocated with the Juneau distribution center), Anchorage (Benson earth station), and in Prudhoe Bay as fiber network restoration earth stations. Our Benson earth station also uplinks our statewide video service; such service may be pre-empted if earth station capacity is needed to restore our fiber network between Anchorage and Prudhoe Bay.

We use our demand assigned multiple access ("DAMA") facilities to serve 69 additional locations throughout Alaska. DAMA is a digital satellite earth station technology that allows calls to be made between remote

villages using only one satellite hop, thereby reducing satellite delay and capacity requirements while improving quality. In addition, 54 (for a total of 123) C-band facilities provide dedicated Internet access and private network services to rural public schools, hospitals, health clinics, and natural resource development industries throughout Alaska. Our network of 83 Ku-band facilities provides dedicated Internet access and private network services to rural public schools, hospitals, health clinics, and natural resource development industries throughout Alaska, and in ten locations in the lower 48 states.

Our Anchorage, Fairbanks, and Juneau distribution centers contain electronic switches to route calls to and from local exchange companies and, in Seattle, to obtain access to other carriers to distribute our southbound traffic to the remaining 49 states and international destinations. Our extensive metropolitan area fiber network in Anchorage supports cable television, Internet and telephony services. The Anchorage, Fairbanks, and Juneau facilities also include digital access cross-connect systems, frame relay data switches, Internet platforms, and in Anchorage and Fairbanks, collocation facilities for interconnecting and hosting equipment for other carriers. We also maintain an operator and customer service center in Wasilla, Alaska. Our operator services traffic is processed by an integrated services platform that also hosts answering services, directory assistance, and internal conferencing services.

We utilize our coaxial cable facilities for DLPS. This delivery method allows us to utilize our own cable facilities to provide local access service to our customers and avoid paying local loop charges to the ILEC.

Our statewide cable systems consist of 3,057 miles of installed cable plant having 450 to 625 MHz of channel capacity. Our cable television businesses are located throughout Alaska and serve 41 communities and areas in Alaska, including the state’s five largest population centers, Anchorage, Fairbanks, the Matanuska-Susitna Valley, the Kenai Peninsula, and Juneau. Our facilities include cable plant and head-end distribution equipment. Some of our locations on the fiber routes are served from the head-end distribution equipment in Anchorage. All of our cable systems are completely digital.

We provide access to the Internet using a platform that includes many of the latest advancements in technology. The physical platform is concentrated in Anchorage and is extended into many remote areas of the state. Our Internet platform includes the following:

·	Our Anchorage facilities are connected to multiple Internet access points in Seattle through multiple, diversely routed networks;

·	We use multiple routers on each end of the circuits to control the flow of data and to provide resiliency; and

·	Our Anchorage facility consists of routers, a bank of servers that perform support and application functions, database servers providing authentication and user demographic data, layer 2 gigabit switch networks for intercommunications and broadband services.

Our dedicated Internet access and Internet protocol ("IP") data services are delivered to a router located at the service point. Our Internet management platform constantly monitors this router and continual communications are maintained with all of the core and distribution routers in the network. The availability and quality of service, as well as statistical information on traffic loading, are continuously monitored for quality assurance. The management platform has the capability to remotely access routers, servers and layer two switches, permitting changes in configuration without the need to be physically located at the service point.

We own state-wide wireless facilities that cover 98% of the population providing service to urban and rural Alaska communities and we will continue to expand these networks throughout the terrestrially and satellite served portions of Alaska in 2011. We own GSM and CDMA wireless facilities serving urban Alaska locations. Our urban network includes Ericsson and Nortel wireless switches located in Anchorage and 183 cell sites that serve the following areas of Alaska: Anchorage and Eagle River, the Matanuska-Susitna Valley, Kenai Peninsula, Southeast, Kodiak and Fairbanks. Our rural network consists of GSM facilities that are located throughout Alaska’s rural villages and communities. We extend our network coverage through roaming arrangements with other GSM and CDMA carriers.

Competition

A discussion of competition by product and service in our Consumer segment follows.

Voice Services and Products Competition

Long-Distance

The long-distance industry is intensely competitive and based upon price and bundling.

In the intrastate, interstate and international long-distance market, we compete against AT&T Alascom, Inc. (“AT&T Alascom”), Alaska Communications Systems Group, Inc. (“ACS”), MTA, long-distance resellers, and certain smaller rural local telephone companies. AT&T Alascom, as a subsidiary of AT&T, Inc., has access to greater financial, technical and marketing resources than we have. There is also the possibility that new competitors will enter the Alaska market. In addition, wireless and voice over Internet protocol ("VoIP") services continue to grow as an alternative to wireline services as a means of reaching customers. Wireless local number portability allows consumers to retain the same phone number as they change service providers allowing for interchangeable and portable fixed-line and wireless numbers. Some consumers now use wireless service as their primary voice phone service for local and long-distance calling.

We have competed in the long-distance market by offering discounts from rates charged by our competitors and by providing desirable bundles of services.

Our ability to compete successfully will depend on our ability to anticipate and respond to various competitive factors affecting the industry, including new services that may be introduced, changes in consumer preferences, demographic trends, economic conditions and pricing strategies.

Local Access

We compete against ACS, the ILEC, in Anchorage, Juneau, Fairbanks and the Kenai Peninsula area; MTA, the ILEC, in the Matanuska-Susitna Valley, and other smaller ILECs in other communities.

In the local telephone services market, the 1996 Telecom Act, judicial decisions, state and federal legislative and regulatory developments, and new technologies have increased the overall likelihood that barriers to local telephone competition will be substantially reduced or removed. These initiatives include requirements that ILECs negotiate with entities, including us, to provide interconnection to the existing local telephone network, to allow the purchase, at cost-based rates, of access to UNEs, to establish dialing parity, to obtain access to rights-of-way and to resell services offered by the ILEC. We have been able to obtain interconnection, access and related services from the ILECs, at rates that allow us to offer competitive services. However, if we are unable to continue to obtain these services and access at acceptable rates, our ability to offer local access services, and our revenues and net income, could be materially adversely affected. To date, we have been successful in capturing a significant portion of the local telephone market in the locations where we are offering these services. However, there can be no assurance that we will continue to be successful in attracting or retaining these customers.

We believe that we have certain advantages over ILECs in providing communications services, including awareness by Alaskan customers of the GCI brand name, our facilities-based communications network, and our prior experience in, and knowledge of, the Alaskan market.

See “Regulation — Wireline Voice Services and Products” below for more information.

Video Services and Products Competition

Our cable television systems face competition from alternative methods of receiving and distributing television signals, including direct broadcast satellite ("DBS"), digital video over telephone lines, broadband IP-based services, wireless and satellite master antenna television ("SMATV") systems, and from other sources of news, information and entertainment such as Internet services, off-air television broadcast programming, newspapers, movie theaters, live sporting events, interactive computer services, and home video products, including video disks. Our cable television systems also face competition from potential overbuilds of our existing cable systems by other cable television operators and municipally-owned cable systems, and alternative methods of receiving and distributing television signals. The extent to which our cable television systems are competitive depends, in part, upon our ability to provide quality programming and other services at competitive prices.

We believe that the greatest source of potential competition for video services comes from the DBS industry. Two major companies, The DirecTV Group, Inc. and DISH DBS Corporation, are currently offering nationwide high-power DBS services. The ILECs in the Matanuska-Susitna Valley and Ketchikan offer digital video service over telephone lines in limited areas. Their product offerings and price points are similar to

our product offerings. With the addition of Anchorage local broadcast stations, increased marketing, ILEC and DBS alliances, and emerging technologies creating new opportunities, competition from these sources has increased and will likely continue to increase.

Competitive forces will be counteracted by offering expanded programming through digital services. Digital delivery technology is being utilized in all of our systems. We have retransmission agreements with Anchorage broadcasters and provide for the uplink/downlink of their signals into all our systems, and local programming for our customers.

Other new technologies may become competitive with non-entertainment services that cable television systems can offer. The FCC has authorized television broadcast stations to transmit textual and graphic information useful to both consumers and businesses. The FCC also permits commercial and non-commercial FM stations to use their subcarrier frequencies to provide non-broadcast services including data transmissions. The FCC established an over-the-air interactive video and data service that will permit two-way interaction with commercial and educational programming along with informational and data services. ILECs and other common carriers also provide facilities for the transmission and distribution to homes and businesses of interactive computer-based services, including the Internet, as well as data and other non-video services. The FCC has conducted spectrum auctions for licenses to provide PCS, as well as other services. PCS and other services will enable license holders, including cable operators, to provide voice and data services. We own a statewide PCS license in Alaska.

Cable television systems generally operate pursuant to franchises granted on a non-exclusive basis. The 1992 Cable Act gives local franchising authorities jurisdiction over basic cable service rates and equipment in the absence of “effective competition.” The 1992 Cable Act also prohibits franchising authorities from unreasonably denying requests for additional franchises and permits franchising authorities to operate cable systems. Well-financed businesses from outside the cable industry (such as the public utilities that own certain of the poles on which cable is attached) may become competitors for franchises or providers of competing services.

We expect to continue to provide, at reasonable prices and in competitive bundles, a greater variety of communication services than are available off-air or through other alternative delivery sources. Additionally, we believe we offer superior technical performance and responsive community-based customer service. Increased competition, however, may adversely affect our market share and results of operations from our cable services product offerings.

Data Services and Products Competition

The Internet industry is highly competitive, rapidly evolving and subject to constant technological change. Competition is based upon price and pricing plans, service bundles, the types of services offered, the technologies used, customer service, billing services, and perceived quality, reliability and availability. We compete with other Alaska based Internet providers and domestic, non-Alaska based providers that provide national service coverage. Several of the providers headquartered outside of Alaska have substantially greater financial, technical and marketing resources than we do.

With respect to our high-speed cable modem service, ACS and other Alaska telephone service providers are providing competitive high-speed data subscriber line services over their telephone lines in direct competition with our high-speed cable modem service. Competitive local fixed wireless providers are providing service in certain of our markets as is a national WiMax-based provider in Anchorage with plans for Juneau and Fairbanks. WiMax is a standards-based wireless technology that provides high-throughput broadband connections over long distances. WiMax can be used for a number of applications, including last mile broadband connections, hotspots and cellular backhaul, and high-speed enterprise connectivity for business. DBS providers and others provide wireless high speed Internet service in competition with our high-speed cable modem services.

Niche providers in the industry, both local and national, compete with certain of our Internet service products, such as web hosting, list services and e-mail.

Wireless Services and Products Competition

We compete against AT&T Mobility, LLC (“AT&T Mobility”), ACS, MTA, and resellers of those services in Anchorage and other markets.

Regulatory policies favor robust competition in wireless markets. Wireless local number portability, which was implemented by the FCC late in 2003, has also increased the level of competition in the industry. Number portability allows subscribers to switch carriers without having to change their telephone numbers.

The communications industry continues to experience significant technological changes, as evidenced by the increasing pace of improvements in the capacity and quality of digital technology, shorter cycles for new products and enhancements and changes in consumer preferences and expectations. Accordingly, we expect competition in the wireless communications industry to continue to be dynamic and intense as a result of the development of new technologies, services and products.

We compete for customers based principally upon price, bundled services, the services and enhancements offered, network quality, customer service, network coverage and capacity, the type of wireless handsets offered, and the availability of differentiated features and services. Our ability to compete successfully will depend, in part, on our marketing efforts and our ability to anticipate and respond to various competitive factors affecting the industry.

Seasonality

Our Consumer segment services and products do not exhibit significant seasonality. Our ability to implement construction projects is hampered during the winter months because of cold temperatures, snow and short daylight hours.

Network Access Segment

Network Access segment revenues for 2010, 2009 and 2008 are summarized as follows (amounts in thousands):

	Year Ended December 31,
	2010		2009		2008
Total Network Access segment revenues1	$	107,227		122,072		153,821

Services and Products

Our Network Access segment offers wholesale voice, data, and wireless services and products to other common carrier customers. We provide network transport, billing services and access to our network to other common carriers. These services allow other common carriers to provide services to their customers that originate or terminate on our network, or on the networks of other communication companies to which we connect.

Voice Services and Products

Revenues derived from Network Access segment voice services and products in 2010, 2009, and 2008 totaled $29.0 million, $49.8 million, and $79.7 million, respectively, or 4%, 8%, and 14% of our total revenues, respectively.

We are engaged in the transmission of interstate and intrastate-switched message telephone service. We terminate northbound message telephone service traffic for several large resellers who do not have facilities of their own in Alaska. We also provide origination of southbound calling card, toll-free services, and toll services for interexchange carriers. Services are generally provided pursuant to contracts.

Data Services and Products

Revenues derived from Network Access segment data services and products in 2010, 2009, and 2008 totaled $61.5 million, $63.9 million, and $71.4 million, respectively, or 9%, 11%, and 12% of our total revenues, respectively.

Data network services include multi-protocol label switching, frame relay, private line and dedicated Internet service.

Wireless Services and Products

Revenues derived from Network Access segment wireless services and products in 2010, 2009, and 2008 totaled $16.7 million, $8.4 million, and $2.7 million, respectively, or 3%, 1%, and 0% of our total revenues, respectively. We provide roaming services on our wireless network within Alaska to other GSM and CDMA wireless carriers.

Sales and Marketing

Our Network Access segment sales and marketing efforts are primarily directed toward increasing the number of other common carriers we serve, the number of billable minutes of long-distance and wireless traffic we carry over our network and the number of voice and data transmission circuits leased. We sell our voice, data and wireless services primarily through direct contact marketing.

Facilities

Our Network Access segment shares common facilities used for voice, data and wireless services by other segments. You should refer to “Consumer Segment — Facilities” above for additional information.

Major Customer

We had no major customer in 2010. During the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, Verizon was a major customer. Revenues attributed to our major customer during the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, totaled $64.5 million and $65.0 million, respectively, or 11% of total revenues for each year.

Competition

Our Network Access segment competes against AT&T Alascom, ACS, and certain smaller rural local telephone carriers. There is also the possibility that new competitors will enter the Alaska market.

Other common carrier traffic routed to us for termination in Alaska is largely dependent on traffic routed to our carrier customers by their customers. Pricing pressures, new program offerings, revised business plans, and market consolidation continue to evolve in the markets served by our carrier customers. If, as a result, their traffic is reduced, or if their competitors’ costs to terminate or originate traffic in Alaska are reduced, our traffic will also likely be reduced, and we may have to respond to competitive pressures. We are unable to predict the effect of such changes on our business.

Historically, we have competed in the Network Access segment market by offering rates comparable to or less than our competitors, by providing a comprehensive service model to meet the complete needs of our carrier customers, and by providing responsive customer service.

Seasonality

Network Access segment long-distance and wireless services revenues derived from our other common carrier customers have historically been highest in the summer months because of temporary population increases attributable to tourism and increased seasonal economic activity such as construction, commercial fishing, and oil and gas activities. Our Network Access segment data services do not exhibit significant seasonality.

Commercial Segment

We offer a full range of communications services and products to commercial and governmental customers. Commercial segment revenues for 2010, 2009 and 2008 are summarized as follows:

	Year Ended December 31,
	2010		2009		2008
Total Commercial segment revenues1	$	128,458		110,135		114,660

Services and Products

Our Commercial segment offers a full range of voice, video, data, wireless and managed services and products to small businesses, local, national and global businesses, governmental entities, and public and private educational institutions.

Voice Services and Products

Revenues derived from Commercial segment voice services and products in 2010, 2009, and 2008 totaled $31.7 million, $30.8 million, and $29.4 million, respectively, or 5% of our total revenues for each year.

Long-Distance

We are engaged in the transmission of interstate and intrastate-switched message telephone service between the major communities in Alaska, the remaining 49 states, and foreign countries. Our message toll services include intrastate, interstate and international direct dial, toll-free services, calling card, operator and enhanced conference calling services. Small business subscribers generally may cancel long-distance service at any time. Certain small business and most large business, governmental and educational institution customers generally contract with us for service over one to five year periods.

Local Access

We offer full featured local access service to our Commercial segment customers using our own fiber and coax facilities and collocated remote facilities that access the ILEC’s UNE loops and wholesale facilities. In areas where we do not have our own facilities or access to ILEC loop facilities, we offer service using total service resale of the ILEC’s local service or UNE platform.

Our package offerings are competitively priced and include popular features, including caller ID, voice messaging, three-way calling, call forwarding, and call waiting. Small business subscribers generally may cancel local access service at any time. Certain small business and most large business, governmental and educational institution customers generally contract with us for service over one to five year periods.

Video Services and Products

Revenues derived from Commercial segment video services and products in 2010, 2009, and 2008 totaled $11.2 million, $9.2 million, and $9.6 million, respectively, or 2% of our total revenues for each year.

Commercial segment subscribers such as hospitals, hotels and motels are charged negotiated monthly service fees. Our video on demand platform is available to hotels in Anchorage that are connected using our fiber facilities. Programming services offered to our cable television systems subscribers differ by system as described in the Consumer segment Video Services and Products section above. You should refer to “Consumer Segment — Services and Products” above for additional information.

Data Services and Products

Revenues derived from Commercial segment data services and products in 2010, 2009, and 2008 totaled $76.8 million, $63.4 million, and $70.1 million, respectively, or 12%, 11%, and 12% of our total revenues, respectively.

Internet

We currently offer several Internet service packages for commercial use. Our business high-speed cable modem Internet service offers access of up to 22 Mbps download and upload speeds, and free 24-hour customer service and technical support. We also provide dedicated access Internet service to commercial and public organizations in Alaska.

Data Networks

Data network services utilize voice and data transmission circuits, dedicated to particular subscribers, which link a device in one location to another in a different location. Private IP, private lines, metro Ethernet and frame relay offer a secure solution for frequent communication of large amounts of data between sites.

Managed Services

We design, sell, install, service and operate, on behalf of certain customers, communications and computer networking equipment and provide field/depot, third party, technical support, communications consulting and outsourcing services. We supply integrated voice and data communications systems incorporating private IP, interstate and intrastate digital data networks, point-to-point and multipoint data network and small earth station services.

Wireless Services and Products

Revenues derived from Commercial segment wireless services and products in 2010, 2009, and 2008 totaled $8.7 million, $6.7 million, and $5.6 million, respectively, or 1% of our total revenues for each year.

Wireless services and products offered to our Commercial segment customers are the same as those described in the Consumer Wireless Services and Products section above. You should refer to “Consumer Segment — Services and Products” above for additional information.

Bundled Services and Products

We combine one or more of our individual service or product offerings into bundles that we sell to our Commercial segment customers at attractive prices as described further in the Consumer segment Services and Products section above. You should refer to “Consumer Segment — Services and Products” above for additional information. Additionally, we use master service agreements with larger enterprise customers to capture the overall relationship.

Sales and Marketing

Our Commercial segment sales and marketing efforts focus on increasing the number of subscribers we serve, selling bundled services, and generating incremental revenues through product and feature up-sell opportunities. We sell our Commercial segment services and products primarily through direct contact marketing.

Facilities

Our Commercial segment uses many facilities to provide services and products that are common to the Consumer segment. You should refer to “Consumer Segment — Facilities” above for additional information.

We provide our own facilities-based local access services to many of Anchorage’s larger business customers through expansion and deployment of SONET, optical ethernet, and gigabit passive optical network fiber transmission facilities, digital loop carrier facilities, and leased facilities.

Our dedicated Internet access and Internet protocol/Multi-Protocol Label Switching data services are delivered to an Ethernet port located at the service point. Our management platform constantly monitors this port and continual communications are maintained with all of the core and distribution elements in the network. The availability and quality of service, as well as statistical information on traffic loading, are continuously monitored for quality assurance. The management platform has the capability to remotely access routers, servers and layer two switches, permitting changes in configuration without the need to physically be at the service point. This management platform allows us to offer network monitoring and management services to businesses and governmental entities. Many of the largest commercial networks in Alaska use this service, including the State government.

Competition

Many of our Commercial segment voice, video, data and wireless services and products are also common to the Consumer segment. You should refer to “Consumer Segment — Competition” above for additional information.

We expect continued competition in commercial customer telephone access, Internet access, wireless and data markets. Competition is based upon price and pricing plans, the type of services offered, customer service, billing services, performance, and perceived quality, reliability and availability.

Presently, there are a number of competing companies in Alaska that actively sell and maintain data and voice communications systems. Our ability to integrate communications networks and data communications

equipment has allowed us to maintain our market position based on customer support services rather than price competition alone. These services are blended with other transport products into unique customer solutions, including managed services and outsourcing.

Seasonality

Our Commercial segment voice, video, data and wireless services do not exhibit significant seasonality. Our ability to implement construction projects to expand our outside plant facilities is hampered during the winter months because of cold temperatures, snow and short daylight hours.

Managed Broadband Segment

Managed Broadband segment revenues for 2010, 2009 and 2008 are summarized as follows:

	Year Ended December 31,
	2010		2009		2008
Total Managed Broadband segment revenues1	$	49,962		44,875		37,047

Services and Products

Our Managed Broadband segment offers Internet access, data network and managed services to rural schools and health organizations.

SchoolAccess® is a suite of services designed to advance the educational opportunities of students in underserved regions of the country. Our SchoolAccess® division provides Internet and distance learning services designed exclusively for the school environment. The Schools and Libraries Program of the Universal Service Fund ("USF") makes discounts available to eligible rural school districts for telecommunication services and monthly Internet service charges. The program is intended to ensure that rural school districts have access to affordable services.

Our network, Internet and software application services provided through our Managed Broadband segment’s Medical Services division are branded as ConnectMD®. Our ConnectMD® services are currently provided under contract to medical businesses in Alaska, Washington and Montana. The Rural Health Care Program of the USF makes discounts available to eligible rural health care providers for telecommunication services and monthly Internet service charges. The program is intended to ensure that rural health care providers pay no more for telecommunication services in the provision of health care services than their urban counterparts. Customers utilize ConnectMD® services to securely move data, images, voice traffic, and real time multipoint interactive video.

We offer a managed video conferencing product for use in distance learning, telemedicine and group communication and collaboration environments. The product is designed to offer customers enhanced communication services that support video, audio and data presentation. Our product benefits customers by reducing travel costs, improving course equity in education and increasing the quality of health services available to patients. The product bundles our data products, video conferencing services and optional rental of video conferencing endpoint equipment. Our video conferencing services include multipoint conferencing, integrated services digital network gateway and transcoding services, online scheduling and conference control, and videoconference recording, archiving and streaming. We provide 24-hour technical support via telephone or online.

Our videoconferencing network is the largest in Alaska, and network coverage includes parts of the states of Washington and Montana. The network supports all H.323 IP videoconferencing standards including the newer H.264 standard, and supports call data rates from 128 Kb per second up to and including multi-megabit high definition calls. In 2010, 2009, and 2008, we terminated over 33,000, 32,000 and 30,000, respectively, videoconferencing endpoint connections amounting to over 2.5 million, 2.0 million and 1.8 million, respectively, videoconferencing minutes on our network.

Sales and Marketing

Our Managed Broadband segment sales and marketing efforts focus on increasing the number of subscribers we serve, selling bundled services, and generating incremental revenues through product and feature up-sell opportunities. We sell our Managed Broadband segment services and products primarily through direct contact marketing.

Facilities

Our Managed Broadband segment services and products are delivered using a platform including many of the latest advancements in technology through a locally available circuit, our existing lines, and/or satellite earth stations. Our Internet services are partially provisioned over a satellite based digital video broadcast carrier that reduces the requirement for new satellite transponder bandwidth to support growth in ConnectMD®, SchoolAccess® and other broadband services.

We employ a packet data satellite transmission technology for the efficient transport of broadband data in support of our ConnectMD® and SchoolAccess® initiatives. Our SchoolAccess® Internet service is delivered as follows:

·	In communities where we have terrestrial interconnects or provide existing service over regional earth stations, we have configured intermediate distribution facilities. Schools that are within these service boundaries are connected locally to one of those facilities;

·	In communities where we have extended communications services via our DAMA earth station program, SchoolAccess® is provided via a satellite circuit to an intermediate distribution facility at the Eagle River earth station; and

·	In communities or remote locations to which we have not extended communications services, SchoolAccess® is provided via a dedicated (usually on premise) very small aperture terminal ("VSAT") satellite station. The VSAT connects to an intermediate distribution facility located in Anchorage.

Our facilities include DeltaNet, a long-haul broadband microwave network ringing the Yukon-Kuskokwim Delta – a region of approximately 50,000 square miles in western Alaska. DeltaNet links more than 30 villages to Bethel, the region’s hub. We utilize DeltaNet to support growth in wireless and broadband services including ConnectMD®and SchoolAccess®.

You should refer to “Consumer Segment — Facilities” above for additional information.

Competition

There are several competing companies in Alaska that actively sell broadband services. Our ability to provide end-to-end broadband services solutions has allowed us to maintain our market position based on “value added” services and products rather than solely based on price competition. These services are blended with other transport and software products into unique customer solutions, including SchoolAccess® and ConnectMD® applications such as video conferencing and unique web content services.

Seasonality

Our Managed Broadband segment does not exhibit seasonality.

Regulated Operations Segment

We offer voice and data services and products to commercial and residential customers in 60 rural communities primarily in Southwest Alaska. Regulated Operations segment revenues were $22.7 million, $23.8 million, and $14.3 million in 2010, 2009, and from the June 1, 2008 date of acquisition of UUI and United-KUC, Inc. (“United-KUC”) through December 31, 2008, respectively.

Services and Products

Our Regulated Operations segment offers wireline communications services to our residential and commercial customers, including local access and Internet services and products.

Sales and Marketing

Our Regulated Operations segment sales efforts are primarily directed toward increasing the number of subscribers we serve. We sell our Regulated Operations segment services through local media advertising, retail stores, and through our website.

Facilities

Our Regulated Operations segment services are delivered by switching, outside plant, terrestrial microwave, and satellite facilities. Our outside plant is primarily aerial and buried copper and fiber optic cables.

Competition

Our Regulated Operations segment has no competition for its local access services.

Seasonality

Our Regulated Operations segment services do not exhibit significant seasonality.

Sales and Marketing – Company-wide

Our sales and marketing strategy hinges on our ability to leverage (i) our unique position as an integrated provider of multiple communications, Internet and cable services, (ii) our well-recognized and respected brand names in the Alaskan marketplace and (iii) our leading market positions in the services and products we offer. By continuing to pursue a marketing strategy that takes advantage of these characteristics, we believe we can increase our customer market penetration and retention rates, increase our share of our customers’ aggregate voice, video, data and wireless services expenditures and achieve continued growth in revenues and operating cash flow.

Environmental Regulations

We may undertake activities that, under certain circumstances may affect the environment. Accordingly, they are subject to federal, state, and local regulations designed to preserve or protect the environment. The FCC, the Bureau of Land Management, the United States Forest Service, the United States Fish and Wildlife Service and the National Park Service are required by the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 to consider the environmental impact before the commencement of facility construction.

We believe that compliance with such regulations has had no material effect on our consolidated operations. The principal effect of our facilities on the environment would be in the form of construction of facilities and networks at various locations in Alaska and between Alaska, Seattle, Washington, and Warrenton, Oregon. Our facilities have been constructed in accordance with federal, state and local building codes and zoning regulations whenever and wherever applicable. Some facilities may be on lands that may be subject to state and federal wetland regulation.

Uncertainty as to the applicability of environmental regulations is caused in major part by the federal government’s decision to consider a change in the definition of wetlands. Most of our facilities are on leased property, and, with respect to all of these facilities, we are unaware of any violations of lease terms or federal, state or local regulations pertaining to preservation or protection of the environment.

The engineered routes of our projects to construct terrestrial and undersea fiber optic cable facilities pass over wetlands and other environmentally sensitive areas. We believe our construction methods used for buried cable have a minimal impact on the environment. The agencies, among others, that are involved in permitting and oversight of our cable deployment efforts are the United States Army Corps of Engineers, National Marine Fisheries Service, United States Fish and Wildlife Service, United States Coast Guard, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Alaska Department of Natural Resources, and the Alaska Office of the Governor-Governmental Coordination. We are unaware of any violations of federal, state or local regulations or permits pertaining to preservation or protection of the environment.

In the course of operating our cable television and communications systems, we have used various materials defined as hazardous by applicable governmental regulations. These materials have been used for insect repellent, paint used to mark the location of our facilities, and pole treatment, and as heating fuel, transformer oil, cable cleaner, batteries, diesel fuel, and in various other ways in the operation of those systems. We do not believe that these materials, when used in accordance with manufacturer instructions, pose an unreasonable hazard to those who use them or to the environment.

Patents, Trademarks, and Licenses

We do not hold patents, franchises or concessions for communications services or local access services. We do hold registered service marks for the letters GCI®, and for the terms SchoolAccess®, Alaska United Fiber Optic Cable System®, GCI ConnectMD®, ConnectMD®, GCI Hypernet®, My GCI®, MyGCI®, Keep Talking Alaska®, Digiminutes®, Unicom®, Cell-ID®, and United-KUC®. The Communications Act of 1934, as amended, gives the FCC the authority to license and regulate the use of the electromagnetic spectrum for radio communications. We hold licenses through our subsidiary GCI Communication Corp. for our satellite and microwave transmission facilities for provision of long-distance services provided by our Consumer, Commercial and Network Access segments.

We hold the following licenses, among others:

Two licenses for use of a 30 MHz block of spectrum, which together authorize provision of PCS services in Alaska. Both licenses have an expiration date of June 23, 2015. Licenses may be revoked and license renewal applications may be denied for cause. We expect the PCS licenses will be renewed in due course when, at the end of the license period, a renewal application will be filed,

A LMDS license which we acquired in 1998 for use of a 150 MHz block of spectrum in the 28 GHz Ka-band for providing wireless services. The LMDS license was renewed in 2008 for an additional 10-year term, following the grant of an extension until June 1, 2012 of the requirement to provide “substantial service” in the service region,

·	A 25 MHz cellular A license for sites located in the Bethel AK-2 B2 portion of RSA 316, serving the Aleutians West Census Area, and

·	Several 25 MHz cellular B licenses are held by our subsidiary Unicom for sites located in the Wade Hampton AK-1 portion of CMA 315 and the Bethel AK-2 portion of CMA 316, throughout the Yukon-Kuskokwim Delta.

Earth stations are licensed generally for fifteen years. The FCC also issues a single blanket license for a large number of technically identical earth stations (e.g., VSATs). Our operations may require additional licenses in the future.

We are certified through the Regulatory Commission of Alaska (“RCA”) to provide cable service by Certificates of Public Convenience and Necessity (“CPCN”). These CPCNs are nonexclusive certificates issued for each community. Although CPCNs have no stated expiration date they may be revoked due to cause.

Regulation

Our businesses are subject to substantial government regulation and oversight. The following summary of regulatory issues does not purport to describe all existing and proposed federal, state, and local laws and regulations, or judicial and regulatory proceedings that affect our businesses. Existing laws and regulations are reviewed frequently by legislative bodies, regulatory agencies, and the courts and are subject to change. Any change in the Act that loosened regulatory oversight of ILECs’ control of bottleneck facilities could have an adverse impact on our businesses. We cannot predict at this time the outcome of any present or future consideration of proposed changes to governing laws and regulations.

Wireline Voice Services and Products

General. As an Interexchange carrier, we are subject to regulation by the FCC and the RCA as a non-dominant provider of interstate, international, and intrastate long-distance services. As a state-certificated competitive local exchange carrier, we are subject to regulation by the RCA and the FCC as a non-dominant provider of local communications services. Military franchise requirements also affect our ability to provide communications services to military bases.

Rural Exemption and Interconnection. A Rural Telephone Company is exempt from compliance with certain material interconnection requirements under Section 251(c) of the 1996 Telecom Act, including the obligation to negotiate Section 251(b) and (c) interconnection requirements in good faith, unless and until a state regulatory commission lifts such “rural exemption” or otherwise finds it not to apply. All ILECs in Alaska are Rural Telephone Companies except ACS in its Anchorage study area. We have had to participate in numerous proceedings regarding the rural exemptions of various ILECs, including ACS for its

Fairbanks and Juneau operating companies, MTA and Ketchikan, in order to achieve the necessary Interconnection Agreements with the remaining ILECs. In other cases the Interconnection Agreements were reached by negotiation without regard to the implications of the ILEC’s rural exemption.

We have completed negotiation and/or arbitration of the necessary interconnection provisions and the RCA has approved current wireline Interconnection Agreements between GCI and all of the major ILECs. We have entered all of the major Alaskan markets with local access services.

See “Description of Our Business by Reportable Segment — Consumer — Competition — Voice Services and Products Competition” for more information.

Access Charges and Other Regulated Fees. The FCC regulates the fees that local telephone companies charge long-distance companies for access to their local networks. On February 8, 2011, the FCC issued its most recent proposal to restructure and possibly reduce interstate access charges. Changes to the interstate access charge regime or introduction of new technologies not subject to access charges could fundamentally change the economics of some aspects of our business. In addition, the RCA adopted intrastate access reform, which has not yet been promulgated as final rules. We believe the proposed reduction of intrastate access rates will result in a cost savings to us and does not present a substantial risk.

Carriers also pay fees for switched wholesale transport services in and out of Alaska. The rates for such services offered by and to any provider were governed by a federal law that was effective through December 31, 2009. The expiration of the applicable federal law is likely to result in a decrease in the rates for services, which would result in a reduction of revenues.

Access to Unbundled Network Elements. The ability to obtain UNEs is an important element of our local access services business. We cannot predict the extent to which existing FCC rules governing access to and pricing for UNEs will be sustained in the face of additional legal action and the impact of any further rules that are yet to be determined by the FCC. Moreover, the future regulatory classification of services that are transmitted over facilities may impact the extent to which we will be permitted access to such facilities. Changes to the applicable regulations could result in a change in our cost of serving new and existing markets.

Recurring and non-recurring charges for UNE-loops and other UNEs may increase based on the rates adopted in RCA proceedings to establish new Interconnection Agreements or renew existing agreements. These increases could have an adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations or liquidity.

Universal Service. The USF pays Eligible Telecommunications Carriers ("ETC") to support the provision of facilities-based wireline telephone service in high-cost areas. Under FCC regulations and RCA orders, we are an authorized ETC for purposes of providing wireline local exchange service in Anchorage, Juneau, Fairbanks, and the MTA study area (which includes the Matanuska-Susitna Valley) and other small areas throughout Alaska. Without ETC status, we would not qualify for USF support in these areas or other rural areas where we propose to offer facilities-based wireline telephone services, and our net cost of providing local telephone services in these areas would be materially adversely affected.

On May 1, 2008, the FCC issued an order adopting the recommendation of the Federal State Joint Board on Universal Service (“Joint Board”) to impose a state-by-state interim cap on high cost funds to be distributed to competitive ETCs. As part of the revised policy, the FCC adopted a limited exception from the cap for competitive ETCs serving tribal lands or Alaska Native regions. While the operation of the cap has generally reduced the high cost fund amounts available to competitive ETCs as new competitive ETCs are designated and as existing competitive ETCs acquire new customers, providers like us who serve tribal lands or Alaska Native regions were provided some relief. On March 5, 2009, the FCC issued an additional order waiving a previously adopted limitation to the exception, the result of which was to provide uncapped support for all lines served by competitive ETCs for tribal lands or Alaska Native regions during the time the interim cap is in effect. The uncapped support for tribal lands or Alaska Native regions and the cap for all other regions will be in place until the FCC takes action on proposals for long term reform.

Proposed Rulemaking to consider adopting reforms to its high cost support program, including, among other things, the proposed competitive ETC phase-out and ways to fund and distribute support for broadband services. We cannot predict at this time the outcome of this proceeding or its effect on high cost support available to us, but our revenue for providing local services in these areas would be materially adversely affected by the reduction of USF support.

Local Regulation. We may be required to obtain local permits for street opening and construction permits to install and expand our networks. Local zoning authorities often regulate our use of towers for microwave and other communications sites. We also are subject to general regulations concerning building codes and local licensing. The 1996 Telecom Act requires that fees charged to communications carriers be applied in a competitively neutral manner, but there can be no assurance that ILECs and others with whom we will be competing will bear costs similar to those we will bear in this regard.

Video Services and Products

General. Because cable communications systems use local streets and rights-of-way, they generally are operated pursuant to franchises (which can take the form of certificates, permits or licenses) granted by a municipality or other state or local government entity. The RCA is the franchising authority for all of Alaska. We believe that we have generally met the terms of our franchises, which do not require periodic renewal, and have provided quality levels of service. Military franchise requirements also affect our ability to provide video services to military bases.

The RCA is also certified under federal law to regulate rates for the Basic Service tier on our cable systems. Under state law, however, cable television service is exempt from regulation unless subscribers petition the RCA. At present, regulation of basic cable rates takes place only in Juneau. The RCA does not regulate rates for cable modem service.

Must Carry/Retransmission Consent. The 1992 Cable Act contains broadcast signal carriage requirements that allow local commercial television broadcast stations to elect once every three years to require a cable system to carry the station, subject to certain exceptions, or to negotiate for “retransmission consent” to carry the station.

The FCC has adopted rules to require cable operators to carry the digital programming streams of broadcast television stations. The FCC requirement that cable operators carry both the analog and digital programming streams of broadcast television stations while broadcasters are transitioning from analog to digital transmission does not apply to all-digital systems like ours. Further, the FCC has declined to require any cable operator to carry multiple digital programming streams from a single broadcast television station, but should the FCC change this policy, we would be required to devote additional cable capacity to carrying broadcast television programming streams, a step that could require the removal of other programming services.

Cable System Delivery of Internet Service. The FCC has defined high-speed Internet over cable as an “information service” not subject to local cable-franchise fees, as cable service may be, or any explicit requirements for “open access.” The Supreme Court affirmed the FCC’s position in a decision issued in 2005.

Although there is at present no significant federal regulation of cable system delivery of Internet services, this situation may change as cable systems expand their broadband delivery of Internet services. Proposals have been advanced at the FCC and Congress to require cable operators to provide access to unaffiliated Internet service providers and online service providers and to govern the terms under which content providers and applications are delivered by all broadband network operators. If such requirements were imposed on cable operators, it could burden the capacity of cable systems and frustrate our plans for providing expanded Internet access services. These access obligations could adversely affect our financial position, results of operations or liquidity.

Segregated Security for Set-top Devices. The FCC mandated, effective July 1, 2007, that all new set-top video navigation devices must segregate the security function from the navigation function. The new devices are more expensive than existing equipment, and compliance would increase our cost of providing cable services. Subject to a waiver granted by the FCC on May 4, 2007, we may continue providing low-cost integrated set-top boxes to consumers to facilitate our all-digital cable networks.

AllVid Proceeding. On April 21, 2010, the FCC adopted a Notice of Inquiry to consider ways to develop a standardized interface for accessing video content, as an alternative to set-top boxes. Adoption of new rules or standards in this area could affect the manner in which we deliver video products to our customers. We do not know if the FCC will propose rules for further consideration.

Pole Attachments. The Communications Act requires the FCC to regulate the rates, terms and conditions imposed by public utilities for cable systems’ use of utility pole and conduit space unless state authorities can demonstrate that they adequately regulate pole attachment rates. In the absence of state regulation, the FCC administers pole attachment rates on a formula basis. This formula governs the maximum rate certain utilities may charge for attachments to their poles and conduit by companies providing communications services, including cable operators. The RCA, however, does not use the federal formula and instead has adopted its own formula that has been in place since 1987. This formula could be subject to further revisions upon petition to the RCA and the FCC has an open rulemaking proceeding to consider application of the federal formula. We cannot predict at this time the outcome of any such proceedings.

Copyright. Cable television systems are subject to federal copyright licensing covering carriage of television and radio broadcast signals. In exchange for filing certain reports and contributing a percentage of their revenues to a federal copyright royalty pool that varies depending on the size of the system, the number of distant broadcast television signals carried, and the location of the cable system, cable operators can obtain blanket permission to retransmit copyrighted material included in broadcast signals. The possible modification or elimination of this compulsory copyright license is the subject of continuing legislative review. We cannot predict the outcome of this legislative review, which could adversely affect our ability to obtain desired broadcast programming. Copyright clearances for non-broadcast programming services are arranged through private negotiations.

Internet-based Services and Products

General. There is no one entity or organization that governs the Internet. Each facilities-based network provider that is interconnected with the global Internet controls operational aspects of their own network. Certain functions, such as IP addressing, domain name routing, and the definition of the TCP/IP protocol, are coordinated by an array of quasi-governmental, intergovernmental, and non-governmental bodies. The legal authority of these bodies is not precisely defined.

Although the FCC does not regulate the prices charged by Internet service providers or Internet backbone providers, the vast majority of users connect to the Internet over facilities of existing communications carriers. Those communications carriers are subject to varying levels of regulation at both the federal and the state level. Thus, non-Internet-specific regulatory decisions exercise a significant influence over the economics of the Internet market.

Many aspects of the coordination and regulation of Internet activities and the underlying networks over which those activities are conducted are evolving. Internet-specific and non-Internet-specific changes in the regulatory environment, including changes that affect communications costs or increase competition from ILECs or other communications services providers, could adversely affect the prices at which we sell Internet-based services.

Recently adopted net neutrality regulations have not yet gone into effect and are subject to court appeals. We are currently assessing the steps required to satisfy the regulations as adopted by the FCC. Further legislative proposals under the banner of “net neutrality”, if adopted, could interfere with our ability to reasonably manage and invest in our broadband network, and could adversely affect the manner and price of providing service.

Wireless Services and Products

General. The FCC regulates the licensing, construction, interconnection, operation, acquisition, and transfer of wireless network systems in the United States pursuant to the Communications Act. As a licensee of PCS, LMDS, and other wireless services, we are subject to regulation by the FCC, and must comply with certain build-out and other license conditions, as well as with the FCC’s specific regulations governing the PCS and LMDS services (described above). The FCC does not currently regulate rates for services offered by commercial mobile radio service providers.

Commercial mobile radio service wireless systems are subject to Federal Aviation Administration and FCC regulations governing the location, lighting and construction of antenna structures on which our antennas

and associated equipment are located and are also subject to regulation under federal environmental laws and the FCC’s environmental regulations, including limits on radio frequency radiation from wireless handsets and antennas on towers.

Interconnection. We have completed negotiation and the RCA has approved current direct wireless Interconnection Agreements between GCI and all of the major Alaska ILECs. These are in addition to indirect interconnection arrangements utilized elsewhere.

Universal Service. The USF pays ETCs to support the provision of facilities-based wireless telephone service in high-cost areas. A wireless carrier may seek ETC status so that it can receive support from the USF. Several wireless carriers, including us, have successfully applied to the RCA for ETC status in Alaska. Under FCC regulations and RCA orders, we are an authorized ETC for purposes of providing wireless telephone service in Anchorage, Juneau, Fairbanks, and the MTA study area (which includes the Matanuska-Susitna Valley) and other small areas throughout Alaska. Without ETC status, we would not qualify for USF support in these areas or other rural areas where we propose to offer facilities-based wireless telephone services, and our net cost of providing wireless telephone services in these areas would be materially adversely affected.

See “Description of Our Business by Reportable Segment — Regulation — Wireline Voice Services and Products — Universal Service” for more information.

Emergency 911. The FCC has imposed rules requiring carriers to provide emergency 911 services, including enhanced 911 services that provide to local public safety dispatch agencies the caller’s communications number and approximate location. Providers are required to transmit the geographic coordinates of the customer’s location, either by means of network-based or handset-based technologies, within accuracy parameters recently revised by the FCC, to be implemented over a phase-in period. We are assessing the application of such parameters in Alaska’s relatively low population and rural service areas. Providers may not demand cost recovery as a condition of doing so, although they are permitted to negotiate cost recovery if it is not mandated by the state or local governments.

State and Local Regulation. While the Communications Act generally preempts state and local governments from regulating the entry of, or the rates charged by, wireless carriers, it also permits a state to petition the FCC to allow it to impose commercial mobile radio service rate regulation when market conditions fail to adequately protect customers and such service is a replacement for a substantial portion of the telephone wireline exchange service within a state. No state currently has such a petition on file, and all prior efforts have been rejected. In addition, the Communications Act does not expressly preempt the states from regulating the “terms and conditions” of wireless service.

Several states have invoked this “terms and conditions” authority to impose or propose various consumer protection regulations on the wireless industry. State attorneys general have also become more active in enforcing state consumer protection laws against sales practices and services of wireless carriers. States also may impose their own universal service support requirements on wireless and other communications carriers, similar to the contribution requirements that have been established by the FCC.

States have become more active in attempting to impose new taxes and fees on wireless carriers, such as gross receipts taxes. Where successful, these taxes and fees are generally passed through to our customers and result in higher costs to our customers.

At the local level, wireless facilities typically are subject to zoning and land use regulation. Neither local nor state governments may categorically prohibit the construction of wireless facilities in any community or take actions, such as indefinite moratoria, which have the effect of prohibiting construction. Nonetheless, securing state and local government approvals for new tower sites has been and is likely to continue to be difficult, lengthy and costly.

Financial Information about our Foreign and Domestic Operations and Export Sales

Although we have several agreements to help originate and terminate international toll traffic, we do not have foreign operations or export sales. We conduct our operations throughout the western contiguous United States and Alaska and believe that any subdivision of our operations into distinct geographic areas would not be meaningful.

Customer-Sponsored Research

We have not expended material amounts during the last three fiscal years on customer-sponsored research activities.

Geographic Concentration and the Alaska Economy

We offer voice, data and wireless telecommunication services and video services to customers primarily throughout Alaska. Because of this geographic concentration, growth of our business and operations depends upon economic conditions in Alaska. The economy of Alaska is dependent upon the natural resource industries, and in particular oil production, as well as investment earnings, tourism, government, and United States military spending. Any deterioration in these markets could have an adverse impact on us. A significant part of the Alaska economy is the state government. All of the federal funding and the majority of investment revenues are dedicated for specific purposes, leaving oil revenues as the primary source of general operating revenues for the State of Alaska. The State of Alaska reported in fiscal 2010 that oil revenues supplied 89% of the State's unrestricted revenues. In fiscal 2011 state economists forecast that Alaska’s oil revenues will supply 87% of the State’s projected unrestricted revenues.

The volume of oil transported by the TransAlaska Oil Pipeline System over the past 20 years has been as high as 2.011 million barrels per day in fiscal 1988. Production has been declining over the last several years with an average of 0.644 million barrels produced per day in fiscal 2010. The State forecasts the production rate to decline from 0.616 million barrels produced per day in fiscal 2011 to 0.52 million barrels produced per day in fiscal 2020.

Market prices for North Slope oil averaged $74.90 in fiscal 2010 and are forecasted to average $77.96 in fiscal 2011. The closing price per barrel was $111.98 on March 1, 2011. To the extent that actual oil prices vary materially from the State’s projected prices, the State’s projected revenues and deficits will change. The production policy of the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries and its ability to continue to act in concert represents a key uncertainty in the State’s revenue forecast.

Should new oil discoveries or developments not materialize or the price of oil become depressed, the long term trend of continued decline in oil production from the Prudhoe Bay area is inevitable with a corresponding adverse impact on the economy of the State, in general, and on demand for telecommunications and cable television services, and, therefore, on us, in particular. Periodically there are renewed efforts to allow exploration and development in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge (“ANWR”). The United States Energy Information Agency has estimated that it could take nine years to begin oil field drilling after approval of ANWR exploration.

No assurance can be given that the driving forces in the Alaska economy, and in particular, oil production, will continue at appropriate levels to provide an environment for expanded economic activity. The governor of the State of Alaska and the Alaska legislature continue to evaluate the state’s oil tax structure which may also affect the oil production industry in Alaska.

No assurance can be given that oil companies doing business in Alaska will be successful in discovering new fields or further developing existing fields which are economic to develop and produce oil with access to the pipeline or other means of transport to market. We are not able to predict the effect of changes in the price and production volumes of North Slope oil on Alaska’s economy or on us.

Deployment of a natural gas pipeline from the State of Alaska’s North Slope to the lower 48 states has been proposed to supplement natural gas supplies. There are two competing companies that are studying the economic viability of a natural gas pipeline, which depends upon the price of and demand for natural gas. Both of the companies completed an initial open season for shipping bids during 2010. These open seasons were approved by government regulators and submissions are currently under evaluation by involved parties.

The State of Alaska maintains the Constitutional Budget Reserve Fund (“CBRF”) that is intended to fund budgetary shortfalls. If the State’s current projections are realized and no surpluses are deposited into the CBRF it is projected that the fund would not be depleted before 2020. The date the CBRF is depleted is highly influenced by the price of oil. If the fund is depleted, aggressive state action will be necessary to increase revenues and reduce spending in order to balance the budget. The governor of the State of Alaska and the Alaska legislature continue to evaluate cost cutting and revenue enhancing measures.

We have, since our entry into the telecommunication marketplace, aggressively marketed our services to seek a larger share of the available market. The customer base in Alaska is limited, however, with a population of approximately 710,000 people. The State of Alaska’s population is distributed as follows:

·	42% are located in the Municipality of Anchorage,

·	14% are located in the Fairbanks North Star Borough,

·	12% are located in the Matanuska-Susitna Borough,

·	8% are located in the Kenai Peninsula Borough,

·	4% are located in the City and Borough of Juneau, and

·	The remaining 20% are located in other communities across the State of Alaska.

Employees

We employed 1,655 persons as of December 31, 2010, and we are not subject to any collective bargaining agreements with our employees. We believe our future success will depend upon our continued ability to attract and retain highly skilled and qualified employees. We believe that relations with our employees are satisfactory.

Other

No material portion of our business is subject to renegotiation of profits or termination of contracts at the election of the federal government.

Item 1A. Risk Factors.

Factors That May Affect Our Business and Future Results

Additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to us or that we currently deem to be immaterial may also materially and adversely affect our business operations. Any of the following risks could materially and adversely affect our business, financial position, results of operations or liquidity.

We face competition that may reduce our market share and harm our financial performance.

There is substantial competition in the telecommunications industry. The traditional dividing lines between long-distance, local access, wireless, Internet and video services are increasingly becoming blurred. Through mergers and various service integration strategies, major providers are striving to provide integrated communications services offerings within and across geographic markets. We face increasing video services competition from DBS providers.

We expect competition to increase as a result of the rapid development of new technologies, services and products. We cannot predict which of many possible future technologies, products or services will be important to maintain our competitive position or what expenditures will be required to develop and provide these technologies, products or services. Our ability to compete successfully will depend on marketing and on our ability to anticipate and respond to various competitive factors affecting the industry, including new services that may be introduced, changes in consumer preferences, economic conditions and pricing strategies by competitors. To the extent we do not keep pace with technological advances or fail to timely respond to changes in competitive factors in our industry and in our markets, we could lose market share or experience a decline in our revenue and net income. Competitive conditions create a risk of market share loss and the risk that customers shift to less profitable lower margin services. Competitive pressures also create challenges for our ability to grow new businesses or introduce new services successfully and execute our business plan. Each of our business segments also faces the risk of potential price cuts by our competitors that could materially adversely affect our market share and gross margins.

For more information about competition by segment, see the sections titled “Competition” included in “Item 1 — Business — Narrative Description of our Business — Description of our Business by Reportable Segment.”

Our business is subject to extensive governmental legislation and regulation. Applicable legislation and regulations and changes to them could adversely affect our business, financial position, results of operations or liquidity.

Wireless Services. The licensing, construction, operation, sale and interconnection arrangements of wireless communications systems are regulated by the FCC and, depending on the jurisdiction, state and local regulatory agencies. In particular, the FCC imposes significant regulation on licensees of wireless spectrum with respect to:

·	How radio spectrum is used by licensees;

·	The nature of the services that licensees may offer and how such services may be offered; and

·	Resolution of issues of interference between spectrum bands.

The Communications Act of 1934, as amended, preempts state and local regulation of market entry by, and the rates charged by, commercial mobile radio service providers, except that states may exercise authority over such things as certain billing practices and consumer-related issues. These regulations could increase the costs of our wireless operations. The FCC grants wireless licenses for terms of generally ten years that are subject to renewal and revocation. FCC rules require all wireless licensees to meet certain build-out requirements and substantially comply with applicable FCC rules and policies and the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, in order to retain their licenses. Failure to comply with FCC requirements in a given license area could result in revocation of the license for that license area. There is no guarantee that our licenses will be renewed.

The FCC has initiated a number of proceedings to evaluate its rules and policies regarding spectrum licensing and usage. Changes proposed by the FCC could adversely impact our utilization of our licensed spectrum and our operation costs.

Commercial mobile radio service providers must implement enhanced 911 ("E911") capabilities in accordance with FCC rules. Failure to deploy E911 service consistent with FCC requirements could subject us to significant fines.

The FCC, together with the Federal Aviation Administration, also regulates tower marking and lighting. In addition, tower construction is affected by federal, state and local statutes addressing zoning, environmental protection and historic preservation. The FCC adopted significant changes to its rules governing historic preservation review of projects, which makes it more difficult and expensive to deploy antenna facilities. The FCC is also considering changes to its rules regarding environmental protection as related to tower construction, which, if adopted, could make it more difficult to deploy facilities.

Video Services. The cable television industry is subject to extensive regulation at various levels, and many aspects of such regulation are currently the subject of judicial proceedings and administrative or legislative proposals. The law permits certified local franchising authorities to order refunds of rates paid in the previous 12-month period determined to be in excess of the reasonable rates. It is possible that rate reductions or refunds of previously collected fees may be required of us in the future. Currently, pursuant to Alaska law, the basic cable rates in Juneau are the only rates in Alaska subject to regulation by the local franchising authority, and the rates in Juneau were reviewed and approved by the RCA in July 2010.

Proposals may be made before Congress and the FCC to mandate cable operators provide “open access” over their cable systems to Internet service providers. As of the date of this report, the FCC has declined to impose such requirements. If the FCC or other authorities mandate additional access to our cable systems, we cannot predict the effect that this would have on our Internet service offerings.

Other existing federal regulations, currently the subject of judicial, legislative, and administrative review, could change, in varying degrees, the manner in which cable television systems operate. Neither the outcome of these proceedings nor their impact upon the cable television industry in general, or on our activities and prospects in the cable television business in particular, can be predicted at this time. There can be no assurance that future regulatory actions taken by Congress, the FCC or other federal, state or local government authorities will not have a material adverse effect on our business, financial position, results of operations or liquidity.

Internet Services. Changes in the regulatory environment relating to the Internet access market, including changes in legislation, FCC regulation, judicial action or local regulation that affect communications costs or increase competition from the ILEC or other communications services providers, could adversely affect the prices at which we sell Internet services.

Local Access Services. Our success in the local telephone market depends on our continued ability to obtain interconnection, access and related services from local exchange carriers on terms that are reasonable and that are based on the cost of providing these services. Our local telephone services business faces the risk of the impact of the implementation of current regulations and legislation, unfavorable changes in regulation or legislation or the introduction of new regulations. Our ability to enter into the local telephone market depends on our negotiation or arbitration with local exchange carriers to allow interconnection to the carrier’s existing local telephone network, to establish dialing parity, to obtain access to rights-of-way, to resell services offered by the local exchange carrier, and in some cases, to allow the purchase, at cost-based rates, of access to UNEs. In some Alaska markets, it also depends on our ability to gain interconnection at economic costs. Future arbitration proceedings with respect to new or existing markets could result in a change in our cost of serving these markets via the facilities of the ILEC or via wholesale offerings.

For more information about Regulations affecting our operations, see “Competition” contained in “Item 1 — Business — Regulation.”

Loss of our ETC status would disqualify us for USF support.

The USF pays support to ETCs to support the provision of facilities-based wireline and wireless telephone service in high-cost areas. If we were to lose our ETC status in any of the study areas where we are currently an authorized ETC, we would be ineligible to receive USF support for providing service in that area. Loss of our ETC status could have an adverse effect on our business, financial position, results of operations or liquidity.

Revenues and accounts receivable from USF support may be reduced or lost.

We receive support from each of the various USF programs: high-cost, low income, rural health care, and schools and libraries. This support was 18%, 14%, and 10% of our revenue for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively. The programs are subject to change by regulatory actions taken by the FCC or legislative actions. The FCC has proposed phasing out support for voice services and targeting support to broadband services, as well as phasing out support for competitive ETCs. In addition, members of Congress have indicated that they may seek enactment of legislation addressing universal service reform, including legislation to limit growth of explicit universal service support funds. Changes to any of the USF programs that we participate in could result in a material decrease in revenue and accounts receivable, which could have an adverse effect on our business, financial position, results of operations or liquidity.

See “Description of Our Business by Reportable Segment — Regulation — Wireline Voice Services and Products — Universal Service” for more information.

We may not be able to satisfy the requirements of the loan/grant we obtained to build TERRA-SW and/or we may have to spend considerably more than expected to complete the project.

The TERRA-SW project requires us to construct network facilities in rural areas of Alaska where extensive network facilities have never been built. Our ability to complete the TERRA-SW project will require us to obtain permits from various government agencies as well as construct facilities in rural locations. We will be unable to meet the requirements of the grant if we are unable to obtain necessary construction permits and if we are unable to construct the necessary facilities in the rural locations. Additionally, we may be required to incur significant unplanned costs if we encounter unplanned construction challenges. These additional unplanned costs may require us to modify our other network expansion plans so that we may meet the requirements of the grant. Our inability to meet the requirements of the grant and/or significant cost overruns in the construction of TERRA-SW could have an adverse effect on our business, financial position, results of operations or liquidity.

Failure to complete development, testing and deployment of new technology that supports new services could affect our ability to compete in the industry. In addition, the technology we use may place us at a competitive disadvantage.

We develop, test and deploy various new technologies and support systems intended to enhance our competitiveness by both supporting new services and features and reducing the costs associated with providing those services or features. Successful development and implementation of technology upgrades depend, in part, on the willingness of third parties to develop new applications in a timely manner. We may not successfully complete the development and rollout of new technology and related features or services in a timely manner, and they may not be widely accepted by our customers or may not be profitable, in which case we could not recover our investment in the technology. Deployment of technology supporting new service offerings may also adversely affect the performance or reliability of our networks with respect to both the new and existing services. Any resulting customer dissatisfaction could affect our ability to retain customers and may have an adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations, or liquidity.

Unfavorable general economic conditions in the United States could have a material adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations and liquidity.

Unfavorable general economic conditions, including the current economic downturn in the United States, could negatively affect our business. While it is often difficult for us to predict the impact of general economic conditions on our business, these conditions could adversely affect the affordability of and demand for some of our products and services and could cause customers to shift to lower priced products and services or to delay or forgo purchases of our products and services. One or more of these circumstances could cause our revenue to decline. Also, our customers may not be able to obtain adequate access to credit, which could affect their ability to make timely payments to us. If that were to occur, we could be required to increase our allowance for doubtful accounts, and the number of days outstanding for our accounts receivable could increase. The government has taken various measures in an attempt to help improve the economy, however, we are unable to predict the success or outcome of such programs. For these reasons, among others, if the current economic conditions persist or decline, this could adversely affect our financial position, results of operations, or liquidity, as well as our ability to service debt, pay other obligations and enhance shareholder returns.

Our business is geographically concentrated in Alaska. Any deterioration in the economic conditions in Alaska could have a material adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations and liquidity.

We offer voice, data and wireless communication and video services to customers primarily in Alaska. Because of this geographic concentration, our growth and operations depend upon economic conditions in Alaska. The economy of Alaska is dependent upon natural resource industries, in particular oil production, as well as tourism, and government spending, including substantial amounts for the United States military. Any deterioration in these markets could have an adverse impact on the demand for communication and cable television services and on our results of operations and financial condition. In addition, the customer base in Alaska is limited. Alaska has a population of approximately 710,000 people, 54% of whom are located in the Anchorage and Matanuska-Susitna Borough region. We have already achieved significant market penetration with respect to our service offerings in Anchorage and in other locations in Alaska.

We may not be able to continue to increase our market share of the existing markets for our services, and no assurance can be given that the Alaskan economy will continue to grow and increase the size of the markets we serve or increase the demand for the services we offer. As a result, the best opportunities for expanding our business may arise in other geographic areas such as the lower 49 states. There can be no assurance that we will find attractive opportunities to grow our businesses outside of Alaska or that we will have the necessary expertise to take advantage of such opportunities. The markets in Alaska for voice, data and wireless communications and video services are unique and distinct within the United States due to Alaska’s large geographical size, its sparse population located in a limited number of clusters, and its distance from the rest of the United States. The expertise we have developed in operating our businesses in Alaska may not provide us with the necessary expertise to successfully enter other geographic markets.

Prolonged service interruptions could affect our business.

We rely heavily on our network equipment, communications providers, data and software to support all of our functions. We rely on our networks and the networks of others for substantially all of our revenues. We are able to deliver services only to the extent that we can protect our network systems against damage from power or communication failures, computer viruses, natural disasters, unauthorized access and other disruptions. While we endeavor to provide for failures in the network by providing back-up systems and procedures, we cannot guarantee that these back-up systems and procedures will operate satisfactorily in an emergency. Should we experience a prolonged failure, it could seriously jeopardize our ability to continue operations. In particular, should a significant service interruption occur, our ongoing customers may choose a different provider, and our reputation may be damaged, reducing our attractiveness to new customers.

To the extent that any disruption or security breach results in a loss or damage to our customers’ data or applications, or inappropriate disclosure of confidential information, we may incur liability and suffer from adverse publicity. In addition, we may incur additional costs to remedy the damage caused by these disruptions or security breaches.

If failures occur in our undersea fiber optic cable systems, our ability to immediately restore the entirety of our service may be limited and we could incur significant costs, which could lead to a material adverse effect on our business, financial position, results of operations or liquidity.

Our communications facilities include undersea fiber optic cable systems that carry a large portion of our traffic to and from the contiguous lower 48 states one of which provides an alternative geographically diverse backup communication facility to the other. If a failure of both sides of the ring of our undersea fiber optic facilities occurs and we are not able to secure alternative facilities, some of the communications services we offer to our customers could be interrupted which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial position, results of operations or liquidity. Damage to an undersea fiber optic cable system can result in significant unplanned expense which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial position, results of operations or liquidity.

If a failure occurs in our satellite communications systems, our ability to immediately restore the entirety of our service may be limited.

Our communications facilities include satellite transponders that we use to serve many rural and remote Alaska locations. Each of our C-band and Ku-band satellite transponders is backed up on the same spacecraft with multiple backup transponders. If a failure of our satellite transponders occurs and we are not able to secure alternative facilities, some of the communications services we offer to our customers could be interrupted which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial position, results of operations or liquidity.

We depend on a limited number of third-party vendors to supply communications equipment. If we do not obtain the necessary communications equipment, we will not be able to meet the needs of our customers.

We depend on a limited number of third-party vendors to supply cable, Internet, DLPS, wireless and other telephony-related equipment. If our providers of this equipment are unable to timely supply the equipment necessary to meet our needs or provide them at an acceptable cost, we may not be able to satisfy demand for our services and competitors may fulfill this demand. Due to the unique characteristics of the Alaska communications markets (i.e., remote locations, rural, satellite-served, low density populations, and our leading edge services and products), in many situations we deploy and utilize specialized, advanced technology and equipment that may not have a large market or demand. Our vendors may not succeed in developing sufficient market penetration to sustain continuing production and may fail. Vendor bankruptcy, or acquisition without continuing product support by the acquiring company, may require us to replace technology before its otherwise useful end of life due to lack of on-going vendor support and product development.

We do not have insurance to cover certain risks to which we are subject, which could lead to the incurrence of uninsured liabilities that adversely affect our financial position, results of operations or liquidity.

As is typical in the communications industry, we are self-insured for damage or loss to certain of our transmission facilities, including our buried, undersea and above-ground transmission lines. If we become subject to substantial uninsured liabilities due to damage or loss to such facilities, our financial position, results of operations or liquidity may be adversely affected.

Our significant debt could adversely affect our business and prevent us from fulfilling our obligations under our Senior Notes.

We have and will continue to have a significant amount of debt. On December 31, 2010, we had total debt of $786.7 million. Our debt balance is expected to increase by $44.2 million with the construction of TERRA-SW between 2011 and 2012. Our high level of debt could have important consequences, including the following:

·	Use of a large portion of our cash flow to pay principal and interest on our Senior Notes and our other debt, which will reduce the availability of our cash flow to fund working capital, capital expenditures, research and development expenditures and other business activities;

·	Increase our vulnerability to general adverse economic and industry conditions;

·	Limit our flexibility in planning for, or reacting to, changes in our business and the industry in which we operate;

·	Restrict us from making strategic acquisitions or exploiting business opportunities;

·	Make it more difficult for us to satisfy our obligations with respect to the Senior Notes and our other debt;

·	Place us at a competitive disadvantage compared to our competitors that have less debt; and

·	Limit, along with the financial and other restrictive covenants in our debt, among other things, our ability to borrow additional funds, dispose of assets or pay cash dividends.

We will require a significant amount of cash to service our debt, complete our planned network expansion and to meet other obligations. Our ability to generate cash depends on many factors beyond our control. If we are unable to meet our future capital needs it may be necessary for us to curtail, delay or abandon our business growth plans. If we incur significant additional indebtedness to fund our plans, it could cause a decline in our credit rating and could increase our borrowing costs or limit our ability to raise additional capital.

We will continue to require a significant amount of cash to satisfy our debt service requirements and to meet other obligations. We expect to incur $44.2 million in additional debt for the construction of TERRA-SW in 2011-2012 and, to meet our capital needs, we may incur additional debt in the future. Our ability to make payments on and to refinance our debt and to fund planned capital expenditures and acquisitions will depend on our ability to generate cash and to arrange additional financing in the future. These abilities are subject to, among other factors, our credit rating, our financial performance, general economic conditions, prevailing market conditions, the state of competition in our market, the outcome of certain legislative and regulatory issues and other factors that may be beyond our control. Our business may not generate sufficient cash flow from operations and future borrowings may not be available to us in an amount sufficient to enable us to pay our debt or to fund our other liquidity needs. We may need to refinance all or a portion of our debt on or before maturity. We may not be able to refinance any of our debt on commercially reasonable terms or at all.

The terms of our debt impose restrictions on us that may affect our ability to successfully operate our business and our ability to make payments on the Senior Notes.

The indentures governing our Senior Notes and/or the credit agreements governing our Senior Credit Facility and other loans contain various covenants that could materially and adversely affect our ability to finance our future operations or capital needs and to engage in other business activities that may be in our best interest.

All of these covenants may restrict our ability to expand or to pursue our business strategies. Our ability to comply with these covenants may be affected by events beyond our control, such as prevailing economic conditions and changes in regulations, and if such events occur, we cannot be sure that we will be able to comply. A breach of these covenants could result in a default under the indentures governing our Senior

Notes and/or the Senior Credit Facility. If there were an event of default under the indentures for the Senior Notes and/or the Senior Credit Facility, holders of such defaulted debt could cause all amounts borrowed under these instruments to be due and payable immediately. Additionally, if we fail to repay the debt under the Senior Credit Facility when it becomes due, the lenders under the Senior Credit Facility could proceed against certain of our assets and capital stock of our subsidiaries that we have pledged to them as security. Our assets or cash flow may not be sufficient to repay borrowings under our outstanding debt instruments in the event of a default thereunder.

Concerns about health risks associated with wireless equipment may reduce the demand for our wireless services.

Portable communications devices have been alleged to pose health risks, including cancer, due to radio frequency emissions from these devices. Purported class actions and other lawsuits have been filed against numerous other wireless carriers seeking not only damages but also remedies that could increase the cost of doing business. We cannot be sure of the outcome of those cases or that the industry will not be adversely affected by litigation of this nature or public perception about health risks. The actual or perceived risk of mobile communications devices could adversely affect us through a reduction in subscribers. Further research and studies are ongoing, and we cannot be sure that additional studies will not demonstrate a link between radio frequency emissions and health concerns.

Additionally, new government regulations on the use of a wireless device while driving may affect us through a reduction in subscribers. Studies have indicated that using wireless devices while driving may impair a driver’s attention. Many state and local legislative bodies have passed or proposed legislation to restrict the use of wireless telephones while driving vehicles. Concerns over safety and the effect of future legislation, if adopted and enforced in the areas we serve, could limit our ability to market and sell our wireless services. Litigation relating to accidents, deaths or serious bodily injuries allegedly incurred as a result of wireless telephone use while driving could result in adverse publicity and further governmental regulation. Any of these results could have a material adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations or liquidity.

A significant percentage of GCI’s voting securities are owned by a small number of shareholders and these shareholders can control shareholder decisions on very important matters.

As of December 31, 2010, our executive officers and directors and their affiliates owned 9% of GCI’s combined outstanding Class A and class B common stock, representing 20% of the combined voting power of that stock. These shareholders can significantly influence, if not control, our management policy and all fundamental corporate actions, including mergers, substantial acquisitions and dispositions, and election of directors to GCI’s Board.

Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments.

None.

Item 2. Properties

Our properties do not lend themselves to description by location of principal units. The majority of our properties are located in Alaska. It is not practicable to allocate our properties to our reportable segments since many of our properties are employed by more than one segment to provide common services and products. Additionally our properties are managed at the consolidated company level rather than at the segment level.

We lease our executive, corporate and administrative facilities and business offices. Our operating, executive, corporate and administrative properties are in good condition. We consider our properties suitable and adequate for our present needs and they are being fully utilized.

Our properties consist primarily of undersea and terrestrial fiber optic cable networks, switching equipment, satellite transponders and earth stations, microwave radio, cable and wire facilities, cable head-end equipment, wireless towers and equipment, coaxial distribution networks, connecting lines (aerial, underground and buried cable), routers, servers, transportation equipment, computer equipment, general office equipment, land, land improvements, landing stations and other buildings. Substantially all of our properties are located on or in leased real property or facilities. Substantially all of our properties secure our Senior

Credit Facility. See note 6 included in “Part II — Item 8 — Consolidated Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” for more information.

Item 3. Legal Proceedings

Except as set forth in this item, neither the Company, its property nor any of its subsidiaries or their property is a party to or subject to any material pending legal proceedings. We are parties to various claims and pending litigation as part of the normal course of business. We are also involved in several administrative proceedings and filings with the FCC and state regulatory authorities. In the opinion of management, the nature and disposition of these matters are considered routine and arising in the ordinary course of business. In addition we are involved in the following matters:

In September 2008, the FCC’s Office of Inspector General ("OIG") initiated an investigation regarding Alaska DigiTel LLC’s (“Alaska DigiTel”) compliance with program rules and requirements under the Lifeline Program. The request covered the period beginning January 1, 2004 through August 31, 2008 and related to amounts received for Lifeline service. Alaska DigiTel was an Alaska based wireless communications company of which we acquired an 81.9% equity interest on January 2, 2007 and the remaining 18.1% equity interest on August 18, 2008 and was subsequently merged with one of our wholly owned subsidiaries in April 2009. Prior to August 18, 2008, our control over the operations of Alaska DigiTel was limited as required by the FCC upon its approval of our initial acquisition completed in January 2007. We responded to this request on behalf of Alaska DigiTel and the GCI companies as affiliates. On January 18, 2011, we reached an agreement with the FCC and the Department of Justice to settle the matter, which required us to contribute $1.6 million to the United States Treasury and grants us a broad release of claims including those under the False Claims Act. The $1.6 million contribution, of which $154,000, $661,000 and $741,000 was recognized in selling, general and administrative expense in the Statement of Operations in the years ending December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively, was paid in January 2011; and

In August 2010, a GCI-owned aircraft was involved in an accident resulting in five fatalities and injuries to the remaining four passengers on board. We had aircraft and liability insurance coverage in effect at the time of the accident. We cannot predict the likelihood or nature of any potential claims related to the accident.

Item 4. Submissions of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

Omitted per General Instruction I(1)(a) and (b) of Form 10-K.

Part II

Item 5. Market for the Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

Market Information for Common Stock

All issued and outstanding shares of GCI, Inc's Class A common stock are held by GCI and are not publicly traded. GCI's Class A and Class B common stock are publicly traded.

Dividends

GCI and GCI, Inc. have never paid cash dividends on GCI’s common stock, and we have no present intention of doing so. Payment of cash dividends in the future, if any, will be determined by GCI’s Board of Directors in light of our earnings, financial condition and other relevant considerations. Our existing debt agreements contain provisions that limit payment of dividends on common stock, other than stock dividends (see note 6 included in “Part II — Item 8 — Consolidated Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” for more information).

Stock Transfer Agent and Registrar

BNY Mellon Shareowner Services is GCI’s stock transfer agent and registrar.

Item 6. Selected Financial Data

The following table presents selected historical information relating to financial condition and results of operations over the past five years.

	Years Ended December 31,
	2010		2009		2008			2007		2006
(Amounts in thousands except per share amounts)
Revenues	$	651,250		595,811		575,442			520,311		477,482
Income (loss) before income tax expense and cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle	$	18,443		7,452		(2,295	)		25,859		34,253
Cumulative effect of a change in accounting principal, net of income tax expense of $44 in 2006	$	-		-		-			-		64
Net income (loss)	$	8,955		3,516		(3,372	)		13,697		18,520
Net loss attributable to the non-controlling interest	$	-		-		1,503			36		-
Net income (loss) attributable to GCI, Inc. common stockholders	$	8,955		3,516		(1,869	)		13,733		18,520
Total assets	$	1,351,760		1,418,397		1,335,301			984,233		914,659
Long-term debt, including current portion and net of unamortized discount	$	781,717		776,380		716,831			538,398		489,462
Obligations under capital leases, including current portion	$	91,165		95,914		100,329			2,851		2,857
Total GCI, Inc. stockholder’s equity	$	200,506		266,317		258,915			259,433		246,278
Dividends declared per common share	$	0.00		0.00		0.00			0.00		0.00

The Selected Financial Data should be read in conjunction with “Part II — Item 7 — Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.”

Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

In the following discussion, GCI, Inc. and its direct and indirect subsidiaries are referred to as “we,” “us” and “our.”

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations discusses our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with GAAP. The preparation of these financial statements requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. On an on-going basis, we evaluate our estimates and judgments, including those related to the allowance for doubtful receivables, unbilled revenues, accrual of the USF high-cost area program subsidy, share-based compensation, reserve for future customer credits, valuation allowances for deferred income tax assets, depreciable and amortizable lives of assets, the carrying value of long-lived assets including goodwill, cable certificates and wireless licenses, our effective tax rate, purchase price allocations, the accrual of cost of goods sold (exclusive of depreciation and amortization expense ("Cost of Goods Sold")), depreciation, and contingencies and litigation. We base our estimates and judgments on historical experience and on various other factors that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions. See also our “Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Statements.”

GCI, Inc. was incorporated under the laws of the State of Alaska in 1997 to affect the issuance of Senior Notes. GCI, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of GCI, received through its initial capitalization all ownership

interests in subsidiaries previously held by GCI. Shares of GCI’s Class A common stock are traded on the Nasdaq National Market tier of the Nasdaq Stock Market under the symbol of GNCMA. Shares of GCI’s Class B common stock are traded on the Over-the-Counter market. Shares of GCI, Inc.’s common stock are wholly owned by GCI and are not publicly traded. The GCI and GCI, Inc. consolidated financial statements include substantially the same account activity.

The following discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and supplementary data as presented in Item 8 of this Form 10-K.

General Overview

Through our focus on long-term results, acquisitions, and strategic capital investments, we strive to consistently grow our revenues and expand our margins. We have historically met our cash needs for operations, regular capital expenditures and maintenance capital expenditures through our cash flows from operating activities. Historically, cash requirements for significant acquisitions and major capital expenditures have been provided largely through our financing activities.

The weakness in the national economy has negatively impacted consumer confidence and spending. There are some indicators that consumer confidence might be improving; however, there is no clear indication that the economy is in a recovery. Continued stress in the economy could lead to reductions in consumer spending which could impact our revenue growth. We believe the Alaska economy continues to perform well compared to most other states at the current time. Mortgage foreclosure rates in Alaska are among the lowest in the nation and the commercial real estate market is steady. The State of Alaska has large cash reserves that should enable it to maintain its budget for at least the short-term. This is important for Alaska’s economy as the State is the largest employer and second largest source of gross state product. The majority of our revenue is driven by the strength of the Alaska economy which appears to have weathered the recessionary pressures relatively well to date. Nonetheless we cannot predict the impact the nation’s economic changes may have on us in the future.

Effective June 1, 2008, we purchased 100% of the outstanding stock of UUI and Unicom. The financial results of the long-distance, local access and Internet services sold to consumer and commercial customers of certain of these acquired companies are reported in the Regulated Operations segment. The financial results of the long-distance services sold to other common carrier customers and the managed broadband services components of certain of these acquired companies are included in the Network Access and Managed Broadband Services segments, respectively. Effective July 1, 2008, we closed on our purchase of 100% of the ownership interests of Alaska Wireless whose results are included in the Consumer segment.

Results of Operations

The following table sets forth selected Statements of Operations data as a percentage of total revenues for the periods indicated (underlying data rounded to the nearest thousands):

						Percentage	Percentage
						Change1	Change1
			Year Ended December 31,			2010	2009
			2010	2009	2008	vs. 2009	vs. 2008

Statements of Operations Data:
Revenues:
	Consumer segment		53%	49%	45%	16%	15%
	Network Access segment		16%	21%	27%	(12%)	(20%)
	Commercial segment		20%	18%	20%	17%	(4%)
	Managed Broadband segment		8%	8%	6%	11%	21%
	Regulated Operations segment		3%	4%	2%	(5%)	68%
		Total revenues	100%	100%	100%	9%	4%
Selling, general and administrative expenses			35%	36%	37%	8%	1%
Depreciation and amortization expense			19%	21%	20%	2%	8%
Operating income			14%	11%	8%	34%	39%
Other expense, net			11%	10%	9%	19%	17%
Income before income tax expense			3%	1%	0%	147%	425%
Net income (loss)			1%	1%	(1%)	155%	204%
Net loss attributable to the non-controlling interest			0%	0%	0%	0%	100%
Net income attributable to GCI, Inc.			1%	1%	0%	155%	288%

	1 Percentage change in underlying data

We evaluate performance and allocate resources based on earnings before depreciation and amortization expense, net interest expense, income taxes, share-based compensation expense, accretion expense and non-cash contribution adjustment (“Adjusted EBITDA”). Management believes that this measure is useful to investors and other users of our financial information in evaluating operating profitability as an analytical indicator of income generated to service debt and fund capital expenditures. In addition, multiples of current or projected EBITDA are used to estimate current or prospective enterprise value. See note 10 to the accompanying consolidated financial statements for a reconciliation of Adjusted EBITDA to Consolidated Income (Loss) Before Income Tax Expense.

Year Ended December 31, 2010 (“2010”) Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2009 (“2009”)

Overview of Revenues and Cost of Goods Sold

Total revenues increased 9% from $595.8 million in 2009 to $651.3 million in 2010. Revenue increases in our Consumer, Commercial and Managed Broadband segments were partially off-set by decreased revenue in our Network Access and Regulated Operations segments. See the discussion below for more information by segment.

Total Cost of Goods Sold increased 7% from $193.7 million in 2009 to $207.8 million in 2010. Cost of Goods Sold increases in our Consumer, Commercial and Managed Broadband segments were partially off-set by decreases in our Network Access and Regulated Operations segments. See the discussion below for more information by segment.

Consumer Segment Overview

Consumer segment revenue represented 53% of 2010 consolidated revenues. The components of Consumer segment revenue are as follows (amounts in thousands):

					Percentage
	2010		2009		Change
Voice	$	57,317		52,654		9	%
Video		118,475		110,986		7	%
Data		61,364		50,327		22	%
Wireless		105,742		80,958		31	%
Total Consumer segment revenue	$	342,898		294,925		16	%

Consumer segment Cost of Goods Sold represented 50% of 2010 consolidated Cost of Goods Sold. The components of Consumer segment Cost of Goods Sold are as follows (amounts in thousands):

					Percentage
	2010		2009		Change
Voice	$	12,042		14,952		(19	%)
Video		51,246		45,350		13	%
Data		3,781		4,367		(13	%)
Wireless		37,412		32,225		16	%
Total Consumer segment Cost of Goods Sold	$	104,481		96,894		8	%

Consumer segment Adjusted EBITDA, representing 52% of 2010 consolidated Adjusted EBITDA, is as follows (amounts in thousands):

					Percentage
	2010		2009		Change
Consumer segment Adjusted EBITDA	$	114,716		86,587		32	%

Selected key performance indicators for our Consumer segment follow:

		December 31,		Percentage
		2010	2009	Change
Voice:
	Long-distance subscribers1	88,200	90,500	(3%)
	Long-distance minutes carried (in millions)	106.9	114.7	(7%)
	Total local access lines in service2	84,800	84,200	1%
	Local access lines in service on GCI facilities2	77,400	75,200	3%
Video:
	Basic subscribers3	130,000	130,500	0%
	Digital programming tier subscribers4	81,800	79,600	3%
	HD/DVR converter boxes5	88,100	81,500	8%
	Homes passed	238,500	232,400	3%
	Average monthly gross revenue per subscriber6	$ 75.83	$ 70.36	8%
Data:
	Cable modem subscribers7	105,700	100,200	6%
Wireless:
	Wireless lines in service8	124,900	115,100	9%
	Average monthly gross revenue per subscriber9	$ 63.96	$ 58.23	21%

1 A long-distance subscriber is defined as a customer account that is invoiced a monthly long-distance plan fee or has made a long-distance call during the month.
2 A local access line in service is defined as a revenue generating circuit or channel connecting a customer to the public switched telephone network.
3 A basic cable subscriber is defined as one basic tier of service delivered to an address or separate subunits thereof regardless of the number of outlets purchased.
4 A digital programming tier subscriber is defined as one digital programming tier of service delivered to an address or separate subunits thereof regardless of the number of outlets or digital programming tiers purchased. Digital programming tier subscribers are a subset of basic subscribers.
5 A HD/DVR converter box is defined as one box rented by a digital programming or basic tier subscriber. A digital programming or basic tier subscriber is not required to rent an HD/DVR converter box to receive service.
6 Year-to-date average monthly consumer video revenues divided by the average of consumer video basic subscribers at the beginning and end of each month in the period.
7 A cable modem subscriber is defined by the purchase of cable modem service regardless of the level of service purchased. If one entity purchases multiple cable modem service access points, each access point is counted as a subscriber. Cable modem subscribers may also be video basic subscribers though basic cable service is not required to receive cable modem service.
8 A wireless line in service is defined as a revenue generating wireless device.
9 Year-to-date average monthly consumer wireless revenues divided by the average of consumer wireless subscribers at the beginning and end of each month in the period.

Consumer Segment Revenues

The increase in voice revenue is primarily due to a $4.4 million or 54% increase in USAC support. We accrue estimated high cost support revenue quarterly and adjust our revenue as we obtain new information that

changes the variables used to calculate our estimate. The increase in USF high cost support is primarily due to changes in the variables used to calculate our estimate and an increase in the number of local subscribers. This increase was partially off-set by an absence of $674,000 in support in 2009 related to services provided during the year ended December 31, 2008. In March 2009, the FCC issued an order which provided uncapped support for all lines served by competitive ETCs for tribal lands in Alaska Native regions retroactive to August 2008. This revenue was for the additional support for the period August to December 2008.

The increase in video revenue is primarily due to the following:

·	A 6% increase in programming services revenue to $93.9 million in 2010 primarily resulting from an increase in digital programming tier subscribers in 2010 and a rate increase on certain cable service offerings beginning in August 2009, and

·	An 8% increase in equipment rental revenue to $23.4 million in 2010 primarily resulting from our customers’ increased use of our HD/DVR converter boxes.

The increase in data revenue is primarily due to a 23% increase in cable modem revenue to $53.4 million due to increased subscribers, rate increases in May and August 2010, our subscribers’ selection of plans that offer higher speeds, and an increase in charges for usage above plan limits.

The increase in wireless revenue is primarily due to the following:

A $19.8 million increase in USAC support to $51.4 million. This increase includes a $16.3 million increase in USF high cost support and a $3.5 million increase in USF low income support. We accrue estimated USF high cost support revenue quarterly and adjust our revenue as we obtain new information that changes the variables used to calculate our estimate. The increase in USF high cost support is primarily due to changes in the variables used to calculate our estimate, an increase in the number of wireless subscribers and $1.0 million for amended line count filings for which the revenue recognition criteria was met in the third quarter of 2010. The increase in USF low income support is due to an increase in the number of wireless subscribers who qualify under this program; and

·	A $7.3 million increase in plan fee revenue to $37.8 million due to an increase in the number of wireless subscribers.

These increases were partially off-set by the following:

An absence of $1.7 million in support recorded in 2009 related to services provided during the year ended December 31, 2008. The support was for a new local access area for which we received ETC status in May 2009. Collectability was not reasonably assured until we were awarded ETC status, therefore we deferred revenue recognition until such status was confirmed, and

An absence of $810,000 recorded in 2009 related to services provided during the year ended December 31, 2008. In March 2009, the FCC issued an order which provided uncapped support for all lines served by competitive ETCs for tribal lands in Alaska Native regions retroactive to August 2008. This revenue was for the additional support for the period August to December 2008.

Consumer Segment Cost of Goods Sold

The decrease in voice Cost of Goods Sold is primarily due to decreased voice minutes carried, cost savings resulting from the increased deployment of local access services lines on our own facilities during 2010, and a $392,000 favorable adjustment based upon refunds from several vendors. In the course of business we estimate unbilled long-distance services Cost of Goods Sold based upon minutes of use processed through our network and established rates. Such estimates are revised when subsequent billings are received, payments are made, billing matters are researched and resolved, tariffed billing periods lapse, or when disputed charges are resolved.

The increase in video Cost of Goods Sold is primarily due to increased channels offered to our subscribers, increased rates paid to programmers, increased costs associated with delivery of digital services offered through our HD/DVR converter boxes due to the increased number of boxes in service, and an increase in digital programming tier subscribers. The increases were partially offset by the absence of a $594,000 charge in 2009 to settle a billing issue with a cable programmer.

The decrease in data Cost of Goods Sold is primarily due to the transition of traffic to our own facilities from leased facilities.

The increase in wireless Cost of Goods Sold is primarily due to increased costs for wireless handset equipment sales associated with the increased number of wireless subscribers and an increased number of premium wireless handsets which have higher costs. As part of an agreement signed in December 2007 with AT&T Mobility, AT&T Mobility has provided to us a large block of wireless network usage at no charge that we use for roaming. We expect this block of minutes to expire in the first half of 2012 at which time we expect a material increase to our wireless Cost of Goods Sold estimated at $8.0 million to $10.0 million annually.

Consumer Segment Adjusted EBITDA

The Adjusted EBITDA increase is primarily due to increased revenue as described above in "Consumer Segment Revenues.” The increase was partially offset by increased Cost of Goods Sold as described above in “Consumer Segment Cost of Goods Sold” and an increase in the selling, general and administrative expense that was allocated to our Consumer segment. The increase in allocated selling, general and administrative expense is due primarily to an increase in the 2009 segment margin upon which the selling, general and administrative expense allocation is based and an increase in consolidated selling, general and administrative expense.

See note 10 in the "Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements" included in Part II of this annual report on Form 10-K for a reconciliation of consolidated Adjusted EBITDA, a non-GAAP financial measure, to consolidated income (loss) before income taxes.

Network Access Segment Overview

Network access segment revenue represented 16% of 2010 consolidated revenues. The components of Network Access segment revenue are as follows (amounts in thousands):

					Percentage
	2010		2009		Change
Voice	$	29,032		49,837		(42	%)
Data		61,494		63,862		(4	%)
Wireless		16,701		8,373		99	%
Total Network Access segment revenue	$	107,227		122,072		(12	%)

Network Access segment Cost of Goods Sold represented 12% of 2010 consolidated Cost of Goods Sold. The components of Network Access segment Cost of Goods Sold are as follows (amounts in thousands):

					Percentage
	2010		2009		Change
Voice	$	15,383		16,522		(7	%)
Data		8,234		9,444		(13	%)
Wireless		1,413		1,287		10	%
Total Network Access segment Cost of Goods Sold	$	25,030		27,253		(8	%)

Network Access segment Adjusted EBITDA, representing 23% of 2010 consolidated Adjusted EBITDA, is as follows (amounts in thousands):

					Percentage
	2010		2009		Change
Network Access segment Adjusted EBITDA	$	50,259		57,563		(13	%)

Selected key performance indicators for our Network Access segment follow:

	December 31,				Percentage
	2010		2009		Change
Voice:
Long-distance minutes carried (in millions)		785.4		840.0		(7	%)

Data:
Total Internet service provider access lines in service1		1,700		1,700		0	%

1 An Internet service provider access line is defined as a revenue generating circuit or channel connecting a customer to the public switched telephone network

Network Access Segment Revenues

The decrease in voice revenue is due to decreases in our average rate per minute on billable minutes carried for our common carrier customers and the transition of voice traffic to dedicated networks. Voice revenue continues to decline as expected due to increased competition in the Network Access business. The increased competition will continue to compress the rates we may charge our customers and, therefore, we expect a continued decline in Network Access segment voice revenue. The decrease is partially offset by a $3.4 million increase from growth of services sold.

The decrease in data revenue is primarily due to decreased rates for capacity purchased by our common carrier customers.

The increase in wireless revenue is due to increased roaming revenue in 2010 primarily due to improved coverage and new roaming partners.

Network Access Segment Cost of Goods Sold

The decrease in voice Cost of Goods Sold is primarily due to decreased long-distance minutes carried, the movement of more traffic onto our network in lieu of carrying traffic on third party networks, and a $771,000 favorable adjustment based upon refunds from several vendors. In the course of business we estimate unbilled long-distance services Cost of Goods Sold based upon minutes of use processed through our network and established rates. Such estimates are revised when subsequent billings are received, payments are made, billing matters are researched and resolved, tariffed billing periods lapse, or when disputed charges are resolved. The decreases were partially offset by a $2.3 million increase from growth of services sold.

The decrease in data Cost of Goods Sold is primarily due to the transition of traffic to our own facilities from leased facilities and a $724,000 favorable adjustment based upon refunds from several vendors. In the course of business we estimate unbilled data services Cost of Goods Sold based upon minutes of use processed through our network and established rates. Such estimates are revised when subsequent billings are received, payments are made, billing matters are researched and resolved, tariffed billing periods lapse, or when disputed charges are resolved. The decreases were partially offset by the absence of a $585,000 favorable adjustment in 2009 resulting from a refund of fiber repair costs. The fiber repair costs were originally recognized in the first quarter of 2008. Due to the uncertainty surrounding the refund of the fiber repair costs, we deferred recognition until collection of the refund was reasonably assured.

Network Access Segment Adjusted EBITDA

The Adjusted EBITDA decrease is primarily due to decreased revenue as described in “Network Access Segment Revenues.” This decrease is partially off-set by decreased Cost of Goods Sold as described in “Network Access Segment Cost of Goods Sold” and a decrease in the selling, general and administrative expense that was allocated to our Network Access segment primarily due to a decrease in the 2009 segment margin upon which the selling, general and administrative expense allocation is based.

Commercial Segment Overview

Commercial segment revenue represented 20% of 2010 consolidated revenues. Commercial segment data revenue is comprised of monthly recurring charges for data services and charges billed on a time and materials basis largely for personnel providing on-site customer support. This latter category can vary significantly based on project activity. The components of Commercial segment revenue are as follows (amounts in thousands):

					Percentage
	2010		2009		Change
Voice	$	31,720		30,830		3	%
Video		11,178		9,175		22	%
Data		76,823		63,383		21	%
Wireless		8,737		6,747		29	%
Total Commercial segment revenue	$	128,458		110,135		17	%

Commercial segment Cost of Goods Sold represented 29% of 2010 consolidated Cost of Goods Sold. The components of Commercial segment Cost of Goods Sold are as follows (amounts in thousands):

					Percentage
	2010		2009		Change
Voice	$	15,212		18,563		(18	%)
Video		2,140		1,956		9	%
Data		38,586		28,661		35	%
Wireless		3,947		3,065		29	%
Total Commercial segment Cost of Goods Sold	$	59,885		52,245		15	%

Commercial segment Adjusted EBITDA, representing 14% of 2010 consolidated Adjusted EBITDA, is as follows (amounts in thousands):

					Percentage
	2010		2009		Change
Commercial segment Adjusted EBITDA	$	30,871		23,174		33	%

Selected key performance indicators for our Commercial segment follow:

	December 31,				Percentage
	2010		2009		Change
Voice:
Long-distance subscribers1		9,100		9,500		(4	%)
Total local access lines in service2		48,300		47,700		1	%
Local access lines in service on GCI facilities		21,200		19,600		8	%
Long-distance minutes carried (in millions)		116.0		123.2		(6	%)

Data:
Cable modem subscribers3		10,700		10,500		2	%

Wireless:
Wireless lines in service4		13,800		10,300		34	%

1 A long-distance customer is defined as a customer account that is invoiced a monthly long-distance plan fee or has made a long-distance call during the month.
2 A local access line in service is defined as a revenue generating circuit or channel connecting a customer to the public switched telephone network.
3 A cable modem subscriber is defined by the purchase of cable modem service regardless of the level of service purchased. If one entity purchases multiple cable modem service access points, each access point is counted as a subscriber.
4 A wireless line in service is defined as a revenue generating wireless device.

Commercial Segment Revenues

The increase in voice revenue is primarily due to the following:

A $799,000 or 32% increase in USAC support. We accrue estimated USF high cost support revenue quarterly and adjust our revenue as we obtain new information that changes the variables used to calculate our estimate. The increase in USF high cost support is primarily due to changes in the variables used to calculate our estimate and an increase in the number of local subscribers, and

·	A $493,000 or 3% increase in local plan fee revenue due to an increase in the number of lines in service.

These increases in voice revenue were partially offset by an $822,000 or 6% decrease in long-distance plan fee revenue due to a decrease in subscribers and minutes carried.

The increase in video revenue is primarily due to an increase in sales of cable advertising services due to state and federal political advertising and the return of seasonal tourism advertising which was negatively affected in 2009 by the general economic slowdown.

The increase in data revenue is primarily due to a $12.1 million or 42% increase in managed services project revenue due to special project work.

The increase in wireless revenue is primarily due to the following:

A $995,000 or 90% increase in USAC support. We accrue estimated USF high cost support revenue quarterly and adjust our revenue as we obtain new information that changes the variables used to calculate our estimate. The increase in USF high cost support is primarily due to changes in the variables used to calculate our estimate and an increase in the number of wireless subscribers; and

·	An $812,000 or 54% increase in plan fee revenue mainly due to an increase in the number of wireless subscribers.

Commercial Segment Cost of Goods Sold

The decrease in voice Cost of Goods Sold is primarily due to the following:

·	A $1.2 million cost saving from increased deployment of local access services lines on our own facilities during 2010,

A $1.0 million favorable adjustment based upon refunds from several vendors. In the course of business we estimate unbilled long-distance services Cost of Goods Sold based upon minutes of use processed through our network and established rates. Such estimates are revised when subsequent billings are received, payments are made, billing matters are researched and resolved, tariffed billing periods lapse, or when disputed charges are resolved; and

·	A $700,000 or 7% decrease in long-distance costs related to the decrease in minutes carried.

The increase in data Cost of Goods Sold is primarily due to an $11.1 million or 57% increase in managed services project Cost of Goods Sold related to the increased revenue described above in “Commercial Segment Revenues.”

The increase in wireless Cost of Goods Sold is primarily due to increased costs for wireless handset equipment sales associated with the increased number of wireless subscribers.

Commercial Segment Adjusted EBITDA

The Adjusted EBITDA increase was primarily due to increased revenue as described in “Commercial Segment Revenues.” This increase was partially off-set by increased Cost of Goods Sold as described in

“Commercial Segment Cost of Goods Sold,” and an increase in the selling, general and administrative expense that was allocated to our Commercial segment primarily due to an increase in consolidated selling, general and administrative expense.

Managed Broadband Segment Overview

Managed Broadband segment revenue, Cost of Goods sold and Adjusted EBITDA represented 8%, 7% and 8% of 2010 consolidated revenues, Cost of Goods Sold and Adjusted EBITDA, respectively.

Managed Broadband Segment Revenues

Managed Broadband segment revenue, which includes data products only, increased 11% to $50.0 million in 2010 as compared to 2009. The increase is primarily due to:

·	A $3.8 million or 9% increase in monthly contract revenue due to increased data network capacity purchased by our ConnectMD® and SchoolAccess® customers, and

·	A $1.2 million or 143% increase in product sales to our customers.

These increases are partially off-set by the $1.7 million in denied funding from the USAC for one ConnectMD® customer for the funding year July 2008 to June 2009. We received the funding commitment letter, which outlined the denied portion, in the second quarter of 2010. This denial is under appeal to the FCC.

Managed Broadband Segment Cost of Goods Sold

Managed Broadband segment Cost of Goods Sold increased from $11.1 million in 2009 to $14.0 million in 2010. The increase is primarily due to the increase in data network capacity described above in “Managed Broadband Segment Revenues.” In addition, the product sales described above in “Managed Broadband Segment Revenues” resulted in a $756,000 or 99% increase in product sales Cost of Goods Sold.

Managed Broadband Segment Adjusted EBITDA

Managed Broadband segment Adjusted EBITDA decreased 1% to $19.3 million in 2010 primarily due to an increase in the Cost of Goods Sold as described above in “Managed Broadband Segment Cost of Goods Sold,” and an increase in the selling, general and administrative expense that was allocated to our Managed Broadband segment primarily due to an increase in the consolidated selling, general and administrative expense. These increases were partially off-set by an increase in revenue as described above in "Managed Broadband Segment Revenues."

See note 10 in the "Condensed Notes to Interim Consolidated Financial Statements" included in Part I of this annual report on Form 10-K for a reconciliation of consolidated Adjusted EBITDA, a non-GAAP financial measure, to consolidated income before income tax expense.

Regulated Operations Segment Overview

Regulated Operations segment revenue, Cost of Goods Sold and Adjusted EBITDA represented 3%, 2% and 3% of 2010 consolidated revenues, Cost of Goods Sold and Adjusted EBITDA, respectively.

A selected key performance indicator for our Regulated Operations segment follows:

	December 31,				Percentage
	2010		2009		Change
Voice:
Total local access lines in service on GCI facilities1		10,000		11,100		(10	%)

1 A local access line in service is defined as a revenue generating circuit or channel connecting a customer to the public switched telephone network.

Regulated Operations Segment Revenues

Regulated Operations segment revenues decreased from $23.8 million in 2009 to $22.7 million in 2010 primarily due to projected lower levels of eligible cost recovery resulting from changes in lines in service, traffic sensitive activity levels and reserve adjustments.

Regulated Operations Segment Cost of Goods Sold

Regulated Operations segment Cost of Goods Sold decreased from $6.1 million in 2009 to $4.4 million in 2010 primarily due to a change in allocation of network maintenance costs which resulted in a decrease to our Regulated Operations segment and an increase to our Consumer, Network Access, Commercial and Managed Broadband segments.

Regulated Operations Segment Adjusted EBITDA

Regulated Operations segment Adjusted EBITDA increased 6% to $6.4 million in 2010.

See note 10 in the "Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements" included in Part I of this annual report on Form 10-K for a reconciliation of consolidated Adjusted EBITDA, a non-GAAP financial measure, to consolidated income before income tax expense.

Selling, General and Administrative Expenses

Selling, general and administrative expenses increased $16.3 million to $228.8 million in 2010 primarily due to the following:

·	A $4.7 million increase in health benefit costs,

·	A $4.5 million increase in labor costs,

A $3.8 million increase in share-based compensation expense primarily due to the absence of a $2.4 million reversal of expense in 2009. The expense had been properly recognized in previous periods for certain performance-based stock options and restricted stock awards but in the third quarter of 2009 we determined they were not expected to vest,

·	$2.0 million in costs, including workers compensation expense, related to an accident involving our company-owned aircraft in August 2010, and

·	A $913,000 increase in our company-wide success sharing bonus accrual.

The increases were partially off-set by the following:

·	A $2.4 million decrease in sales expense,

·	The absence of $1.2 million in costs for the conversion of our customers’ wireless phones to our facilities in 2009, and

·	The absence of a $640,000 contribution expense recognized upon the gift of an IRU to the University of Alaska that was recorded in 2009.

As a percentage of total revenues, selling, general and administrative expenses decreased to 35% in 2010 from 36% in 2009, primarily due to increasing revenues.

Depreciation and Amortization Expense

Depreciation and amortization expense increased $2.8 million to $126.1 million in 2010 primarily due to new assets placed in service in 2010 partially offset by assets which became fully depreciated during 2010.

Other Expense, Net

Other expense, net of other income, increased 19% to $70.1 million in 2010 primarily due to a $13.2 million increase in interest expense to $69.4 million in 2010. The interest expense increase is due to the issuance of the 2019 Notes in November 2009, which have a higher interest rate than the interest rate paid on our amended Senior Credit Facility, and a higher average outstanding debt balance during 2010 than 2009. The proceeds from the issuance of the 2019 Notes were primarily used to repay and retire the outstanding amount due on our amended Senior Credit Facility.

Income Tax Expense

GCI, Inc., as a wholly-owned subsidiary and member of the GCI controlled group of corporations, files its income tax returns as part of the consolidated group of corporations under GCI. Accordingly, all discussions regarding income taxes reflect the consolidated group’s activity. Our income tax expense and deferred income tax assets are presented herein using the separate-entity method.

Income tax expense totaled $9.5 million and $3.9 million in 2010 and 2009, respectively. Our effective income tax rate decreased from 53% in 2009 to 51% in 2010.

We have recorded deferred tax assets of $89.0 million associated with income tax net operating losses that were generated from 1996 to 2010 and that expire from 2011 to 2030, and with charitable contributions that were converted to net operating losses in 2004 through 2010, and that expire in 2024 through 2030, respectively.

Tax benefits associated with recorded deferred tax assets are considered to be more likely than not realizable through future reversals of existing taxable temporary differences and future taxable income exclusive of reversing temporary differences and carryforwards. The amount of deferred tax asset considered realizable, however, could be reduced if estimates of future taxable income during the carryforward period are reduced which would result in additional income tax expense. We estimate that our effective annual income tax rate for financial statement purposes will be 50% to 54% in the year ended December 31, 2011, primarily due to the large amount of permanent differences in 2011 as compared to our net income before income tax expense.

Year Ended December 31, 2009 (“2009”) Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2008 (“2008”)

Overview of Revenues and Cost of Goods Sold

Total revenues increased 4% from $575.4 million in 2008 to $595.8 million in 2009. Revenue increases in our Consumer, Managed Broadband and Regulated Operations segments were partially off-set by decreases in our Network Access and Commercial segments. See the discussion below for more information by segment.

Total Cost of Goods Sold decreased 5% from $203.1 million in 2008 to $193.7 million in 2009. Cost of Goods Sold increases in our Consumer, Managed Broadband and Regulated Operations segments were partially off-set by decreases in our Network Access and Commercial segments. See the discussion below for more information by segment.

Consumer Segment Overview

Consumer segment revenue represented 49% of 2009 consolidated revenues. The components of Consumer segment revenue are as follow (amounts in thousands):

					Percentage
	2009		2008		Change
Voice	$	52,654		47,042		12	%
Video		110,986		105,238		5	%
Data		50,327		42,692		18	%
Wireless		80,958		60,660		33	%
Total Consumer segment revenue	$	294,925		255,632		15	%

Consumer segment Cost of Goods Sold represented 50% of 2009 consolidated Cost of Goods Sold. The components of Consumer segment Cost of Goods Sold are as follows (amounts in thousands):

					Percentage
	2009		2008		Change
Voice	$	14,952		18,121		(17	%)
Video		45,350		40,279		13	%
Data		4,367		6,554		(33	%)
Wireless		32,225		24,899		29	%
Total Consumer segment Cost of Goods Sold	$	96,894		89,853		8	%

Consumer segment adjusted EBITDA, representing 45% of 2009 consolidated Adjusted EBITDA, is as follows (amounts in thousands):

					Percentage
	2009		2008		Change
Consumer segment Adjusted EBITDA	$	86,587		58,949		47	%

Selected key performance indicators for our Consumer segment follow:

	December 31,				Percentage
	2009		2008		Change
Voice:
Long-distance subscribers1		90,500		88,600		2	%
Long-distance minutes carried (in millions)		114.7		128.6		(11	%)
Total local access lines in service2		84,200		80,700		4	%
Local access lines in service on GCI facilities2		75,200		68,700		9	%
Video:
Basic subscribers3		130,500		132,500		(2	%)
Digital programming tier subscribers4		79,600		71,900		11	%
HD/DVR converter boxes5		81,500		67,800		20	%
Homes passed		232,400		229,300		1	%
Average monthly gross revenue per subscriber6	$	70.36	$	67.40		4	%
Data:
Cable modem subscribers7		100,200		94,400		6	%
Wireless:
Wireless lines in service8		115,100		88,700		30	%
Average monthly gross revenue per subscriber9	$	61.54	$	57.77		7	%

1 A long-distance customer is defined as a customer account that is invoiced a monthly long-distance plan fee or has made a long-distance call during the month.
2 A local access line in service is defined as a revenue generating circuit or channel connecting a customer to the public switched telephone network.
3 A basic cable subscriber is defined as one basic tier of service delivered to an address or separate subunits thereof regardless of the number of outlets purchased. On January 1, 2009, our Consumer segment transferred 2,900 basic cable subscribers to our Commercial segment.
4 A digital programming tier subscriber is defined as one digital programming tier of service delivered to an address or separate subunits thereof regardless of the number of outlets or digital programming tiers purchased. Digital programming tier subscribers are a subset of basic subscribers.
5 A HD/DVR converter box is defined as one box rented by a digital programming or basic tier subscriber. A digital programming or basic tier subscriber is not required to rent an HD/DVR converter box to receive service.
6 Year-to-date average monthly consumer video revenues divided by the average of consumer video basic subscribers at the beginning and end of each month in the period.
7 A cable modem subscriber is defined by the purchase of cable modem service regardless of the level of service purchased. If one entity purchases multiple cable modem service access points, each access point is counted as a subscriber. Cable modem subscribers may also be video basic subscribers though basic cable service is not required to receive cable modem service.
8 A wireless line in service is defined as a revenue generating wireless device.
9 Year-to-date average monthly consumer wireless revenues divided by the average of consumer wireless subscribers at the beginning and end of each month in the period.

Consumer Segment Revenues

The increase in voice revenue is primarily due to a $3.7 million or 82% increase in recognized support from the USAC and an increase in monthly recurring local service fee revenue. The increase in USAC support is primarily due to an FCC order issued in March 2009, the result of which provided uncapped support for all lines served by competitive ETCs for tribal lands or Alaska Native regions retroactive to August 2008. The

issuance of this order allowed us to recognize in 2009 $674,000 in additional USAC support for services provided from August 2008 to December 2008 that is included in the revenue increase discussed above, and the removal of the cap allowed us to increase the USAC support revenue that we recognized in 2009.

The increase in monthly recurring local service fee revenue is due to increased subscribers. The increase in voice revenue was partially offset by decreased long-distance billable minutes carried.

The increase in video revenue is primarily due to the following:

·	A 4% increase in programming services revenue to $88.1 million in 2009 primarily resulting from an increase in digital programming tier subscribers in 2009 and a rate increase on certain cable service offerings beginning in August 2009, and

·	A 12% increase in equipment rental revenue to $21.6 million in 2009 primarily resulting from our customers’ increased use of our HD/DVR converter boxes.

The increase in data revenue is primarily due to a 19% increase in cable modem revenue to $43.4 million due to increased subscribers and their selection of more value-added features.

The increase in wireless revenue is primarily due to the following:

·	An $11.9 million or 162% increase in recognized support from the USAC primarily due to the following:

o	Increased wireless subscribers in areas that receive USAC support,

Recognition of $3.1 million to be received from the USAC for interstate common line support for a new local access area for which we received ETC status in May 2009 of which $1.7 million was related to services provided during 2008. Collectability was not reasonably assured until we were awarded ETC status, therefore, we deferred revenue recognition until such status was confirmed,

Recognition of $1.1 million upon a change in our estimate of support to be received from the USAC for interstate common line support of which $77,000 was related to 2008. We accrue estimated program revenue quarterly and adjust our revenue as we obtain new information that changes the variables used to calculate our estimate, and

The FCC order issued in March 2009, the result of which provides uncapped support for all lines served by competitive ETCs for tribal lands or Alaska Native regions retroactive to August 2008. The issuance of this order allowed us to recognize $810,000 in additional USAC support from August 2008 to December 2008 in 2009 that is included in the revenue increase discussed above.

·	An increase in the number of wireless subscribers.

The increase in wireless revenue was partially off-set by receipt of $2.8 million in July 2008 from the USAC for retroactive interstate common line support at Alaska DigiTel for which revenue was recognized in 2008.

Consumer Segment Cost of Goods Sold

The decrease in voice Cost of Goods Sold is primarily due to cost savings resulting from the increased deployment of local access services DLPS lines on our own facilities during 2009 and decreased voice minutes carried.

The video Cost of Goods Sold increase is primarily due to increased channels offered to our subscribers, increased rates paid to programmers, increased costs associated with delivery of digital services offered over our HD/DVR converter boxes due to the increased number of boxes in service, an increase in digital programming tier subscribers, and the recognition of a $594,000 charge in 2009 to settle a billing issue with a cable programmer.

The decrease in data Cost of Goods Sold is primarily due to the transition of traffic to our own facilities from leased facilities and the addition of more peering partners for Internet traffic, which was partially offset by an increase in costs due to an increased number of cable modem subscribers.

promotions of premium wireless handsets which have higher costs. The increase was partially offset by decreased costs due to the June 4, 2008 implementation of the new distribution agreement with AT&T Mobility.

AT&T Mobility acquired Dobson, including its Alaska properties, on November 15, 2007. In December 2007 we signed an agreement with AT&T Mobility that provided for an orderly transition of our wireless customers from the Dobson/AT&T network in Alaska to our wireless facilities that we began building in 2008 and substantially completed in 2010. The agreement required our customers to be on our wireless network by June 30, 2009, but allowed our customers to use the AT&T Mobility network for roaming during the transition period. We started transitioning our customers to our wireless facilities in November 2008. We successfully migrated all but 200 customers from the AT&T Mobility network to our network by the required transition date of June 30, 2009. The four-year transition period, which expires June 30, 2012, provides us adequate time to replace the Dobson/AT&T network in Alaska with our own wireless facilities. Under the agreement, AT&T Mobility’s obligation to purchase network services from us terminated as of July 1, 2008. AT&T Mobility provided us with a large block of wireless network usage at no charge to facilitate the transition of our customers to our facilities. We will pay for usage in excess of that base transitional amount. Under the previous agreement with Dobson, our margin was fixed. Under the new agreement with AT&T Mobility, we will pay for usage in excess of the block of no charge minutes on a per minute basis. The block of wireless network usage at no charge has substantially reduced our wireless product Cost of Goods Sold beginning June 4, 2008 through December 31, 2009. We expect this block of minutes to expire in the first half of 2012 at which time we expect a material increase to our wireless Cost of Goods Sold estimated at $8.0 million to $10.0 million annually.

Consumer Segment Adjusted EBITDA

The increase in Adjusted EBITDA is primarily due to increased revenue as described above in "Consumer Segment Revenues," which was partially offset by increased Cost of Goods Sold as described above in "Consumer Segment Cost of Goods Sold" and an increase in the selling, general and administrative expense that was allocated to our Consumer segment primarily due to an increase in the 2008 segment margin upon which the allocation is based.

Network Access Segment Overview

Network access segment revenue represented 21% of 2009 consolidated revenues. The components of Network Access segment revenue are as follows (amounts in thousands):

					Percentage
	2009		2008		Change
Voice	$	49,837		79,744		(38	%)
Data		63,862		71,414		(11	%)
Wireless		8,373		2,663		214	%
Total Network Access segment revenue	$	122,072		153,821		(21	%)

Network Access segment Cost of Goods Sold represented 14% of 2009 consolidated Cost of Goods Sold. The components of Network Access segment Cost of Goods Sold are as follows (amounts in thousands):

					Percentage
	2009		2008		Change
Voice	$	16,522		27,149		(39	%)
Data		9,444		11,539		(18	%)
Wireless		1,287		1,638		(21	%)
Total Network Access segment Cost of Goods Sold	$	27,253		40,326		(32	%)

Network Access segment Adjusted EBITDA, representing 30% of 2009 consolidated Adjusted EBITDA, is as follows (amounts in thousands):

					Percentage
	2009		2008		Change
Network Access segment Adjusted EBITDA	$	57,563		73,647		(22	%)

Selected key performance indicators for our Network Access segment follow:

	December 31,				Percentage
	2009		2008		Change
Voice:
Long-distance minutes carried (in millions)		840		1,094		(23	%)

Data:
Total Internet service provider access lines in service1		1,700		1,800		(6	%)

1 An Internet service provider access line is defined as a revenue generating circuit or channel connecting a customer to the public switched telephone network

Network Access Segment Revenues

The decrease in voice revenue is due in part to the June 4, 2008 implementation of the new distribution agreement with AT&T Mobility as described in "Part II – Item VII – Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Consumer Segment Cost of Goods Sold” for 2009 compared to 2008. The voice revenue decrease also resulted from a decrease in our average rate per minute on billable minutes carried for our common carrier customers and the transition of voice traffic to dedicated networks. The average rate per minute decrease is primarily due to a change in the composition of traffic and a 3.0% interstate rate decrease mandated by federal law.

The decrease in data revenue is primarily due to a change in the composition of traffic resulting in IRU operating leases and service agreements replacing data network service agreements.

The increase in wireless revenue is primarily due to increased roaming revenue in 2009 primarily due to the construction of our state-wide GSM network starting in 2008 and the 2008 expansion of our CDMA network.

Network Access Segment Cost of Goods Sold

The decrease in voice Cost of Goods Sold is primarily due to decreased long-distance minutes carried and the movement of more traffic onto our network in lieu of carrying traffic on third party networks.

The decrease in data Cost of Goods Sold is primarily due to a change in the composition of traffic resulting in IRU operating leases and service agreements replacing data network service agreements and a $585,000 favorable adjustment resulting from a refund of fiber repair costs. The fiber repair costs were originally recognized in the first quarter of 2008. Due to the uncertainty surrounding the recovery of the fiber repair costs, we deferred recognition until collection of the refund was reasonably assured.

Network Access Segment Adjusted EBITDA

The Adjusted EBITDA decrease is primarily due to decreased revenue as described above in "Network Access Segment Revenues," which is partially off-set by decreased Cost of Goods Sold as described above in “Network Access Segment Cost of Goods Sold” and a decrease in the selling, general and administrative expense that was allocated to our Network Access segment primarily due to a decrease in the 2008 segment margin upon which the allocation is based.

Commercial Segment Overview

Commercial segment revenue represented 18% of 2009 consolidated revenues. Commercial segment data revenue is comprised of monthly recurring charges for data services and charges billed on a time and materials basis largely for personnel providing on-site customer support. This latter category can vary significantly based on project activity. The components of Commercial segment revenue are as follows (amounts in thousands):

					Percentage
	2009		2008		Change
Voice	$	30,830		29,398		5	%
Video		9,175		9,604		(4	%)
Data		63,383		70,068		(10	%)
Wireless		6,747		5,590		21	%
Total Commercial segment revenue	$	110,135		114,660		(4	%)

Commercial segment Cost of Goods Sold represented 27% of 2009 consolidated Cost of Goods Sold. The components of Commercial segment Cost of Goods Sold are as follows (amounts in thousands):

					Percentage
	2009		2008		Change
Voice	$	18,563		19,581		(5	%)
Video		1,956		1,551		26	%
Data		28,661		34,391		(17	%)
Wireless		3,065		3,957		(23	%)
Total Commercial segment Cost of Goods Sold	$	52,245		59,480		(12	%)

Commercial segment Adjusted EBITDA, representing 12% of 2009 consolidated Adjusted EBITDA, is as follows (amounts in thousands):

					Percentage
	2009		2008		Change
Commercial segment Adjusted EBITDA	$	23,174		20,710		12	%

Selected key performance indicators for our Commercial segment follow:

	December 31,				Percentage
	2009		2008		Change
Voice:
Long-distance subscribers1		9,500		9,700		(2	%)
Total local access lines in service2		47,700		46,200		3	%
Local access lines in service on GCI facilities		19,600		18,700		5	%
Long-distance minutes carried (in millions)		123.2		129.5		(5	%)

Data:
Cable modem subscribers3		10,500		8,900		18	%

Wireless:
Wireless lines in service4		10,300		7,600		36	%
1 A long-distance subscriber is defined as a customer account that is invoiced a monthly long-distance plan fee or has made a long-distance call during the month.
2 A local access line in service is defined as a revenue generating circuit or channel connecting a customer to the public switched telephone network.
3 A cable modem subscriber is defined by the purchase of cable modem service regardless of the level of service purchased. If one entity purchases multiple cable modem service access points, each access point is counted as a subscriber.
4 A wireless line in service is defined as a revenue generating wireless device.

Commercial Segment Revenues

The increase in voice revenue is primarily due to increased local access lines in service and a $1.3 million or 109% increase in recognized support from the USAC primarily due to increased local subscribers and the FCC order issued in March 2009, the result of which provides uncapped support for all lines served by competitive ETCs for tribal lands or Alaska Native regions retroactive to August 2008. The issuance of this order allowed us to recognize $386,000 in additional USAC support from August 2008 to December 2008 in 2009 that is included in the revenue increase discussed above. The increase in voice revenue was partially off-set by decreased long-distance subscribers and decreased voice minutes carried.

The decrease in data revenue is primarily due to a $7.2 million or 19% decrease in managed services project revenue partially off-set by a $1.0 million or 6% increase in Internet revenue primarily due to an increase in cable modem subscribers.

The increase in wireless revenue is primarily due to an increase in the number of wireless subscribers.

Commercial Segment Cost of Goods Sold

The decrease in voice Cost of Goods Sold is primarily due to cost savings resulting from an increase in local access lines in service on our own facilities during 2009 and decreased long-distance billable minutes carried.

The decrease in data Cost of Goods Sold is primarily due to a $5.7 million or 22% decrease in managed services project Cost of Goods Sold.

Commercial Segment Adjusted EBITDA

The Adjusted EBITDA increase was primarily due to decreased Cost of Goods Sold as described above in “Commercial Segment Cost of Goods Sold” that was partially offset by a decrease in revenue as described above in "Commercial Segment Revenues."

Managed Broadband Segment Overview

Managed Broadband segment revenue, Cost of Goods Sold and adjusted EBITDA represented 8%, 6% and 10% of 2009 consolidated revenues, Cost of Goods Sold and adjusted EBITDA, respectively.

Managed Broadband Segment Revenues

Managed Broadband segment revenue, which includes data products only, increased 21% to $44.9 million in 2009 as compared to 2008. The increase is primarily due to increased circuits purchased by our ConnectMD® customers and a $5.3 million increase from our acquisition of Unicom effective June 1, 2008. The increase is partially off-set by a decrease in revenue associated with product sales.

Managed Broadband Segment Cost of Goods Sold

Managed Broadband segment Cost of Goods Sold increased from $10.3 million in 2008 to $11.1 million in 2009 primarily due to an increase in costs associated with the increased revenue partially off-set by a decrease in costs associated with product sales.

Managed Broadband Segment Adjusted EBITDA

Managed Broadband segment Adjusted EBITDA increased 37% to $19.6 million in 2009 primarily due to an increase in revenue as described above in "Managed Broadband Segment Revenues."

Regulated Operations Segment Overview

Regulated Operations segment revenue, Cost of Goods Sold and Adjusted EBITDA represented 4%, 3% and 3% of 2009 consolidated revenues, Cost of Goods Sold and Adjusted EBITDA, respectively.

A selected key performance indicator for our Regulated Operations segment follows:

	December 31,				Percentage
	2009		2008		Change
Voice:
Total local access lines in service1		11,100		12,100		(8	%)


1 A local access line in service is defined as a revenue generating circuit or channel connecting a customer to the public switched telephone network.

Regulated Operations Segment Revenues

Regulated Operations segment revenues increased from $14.3 million in 2008 to $23.8 million in 2009 primarily due to our acquisition of UUI effective June 1, 2008.

Regulated Operations Segment Cost of Goods Sold

Regulated Operations segment Cost of Goods Sold increased from $3.1 million in 2008 to $6.1 million in 2009 primarily due to our acquisition of UUI effective June 1, 2008.

Regulated Operations Segment Adjusted EBITDA

Regulated Operations segment Adjusted EBITDA was $6.0 million in 2009 and $3.6 million in 2008 primarily due to our acquisition of UUI effective June 1, 2008.

Selling, General and Administrative Expenses

Selling, general and administrative expenses increased from $210.3 million in 2008 to $212.7 million in 2009 primarily due to the following:

·	A $4.5 million increase in labor costs,

·	$4.1 million in additional expense resulting from our June 1, 2008, acquisition of UUI and Unicom,

·	A $1.4 million increase in our company-wide success sharing bonus accrual in 2009,

·	$1.1 million in additional expense incurred in 2009 for the conversion of our customers' wireless phones to our facilities, and

·	A $1.1 million increase in lease related expense.

The increases were partially off-set by the following:

·	A $4.9 million decrease in contract labor costs,

·	A $4.5 million decrease in share-based compensation expense primarily due to the reversal of expense properly recognized in previous periods for certain performance-based stock options and restricted stock awards that were ultimately not expected to vest, and

·	The absence of $1.8 million to terminate a management agreement that was paid in 2008 upon the acquisition of our non-controlling interest in Alaska DigiTel.

As a percentage of total revenues, selling, general and administrative expenses decreased to 36% in 2009 from 37% in 2008, primarily due to increasing revenue.

Depreciation and Amortization Expense

Depreciation and amortization expense increased 8% to $123.4 million in 2009. The increase is primarily due to our $322.3 million investment in equipment and facilities placed into service during 2008 for which a full year of depreciation was recorded in 2009, and the $182.4 million investment in equipment and facilities placed into service during the year ended December 31, 2009 for which a partial year of depreciation was recorded in 2009. The increase is partially off-set by a $12.0 million depreciation charge in 2008 to reflect a reduction of the estimated useful life of certain assets that were decommissioned at the end of 2008.

Other Expense, Net

Other expense, net of other income, increased 17% to $58.7 million in 2009 primarily due to the following:

·	A $3.7 million decrease in capitalized interest in 2009 compared to 2008,

·	$2.7 million in additional interest expense resulting from the Galaxy 18 capital lease commencing in May 2008, and

·	A $1.9 million increase in interest expense resulting from the 2009 write-off of the original issue discount on our Senior Credit Facility.

The interest expense increase is partially off-set by the absence of a $921,000 loss that was recorded in 2008 relating to the fair value change on a derivative instrument.

Income Tax Expense

Income tax expense totaled $3.9 million and $1.1 million in 2009 and 2008, respectively. Our effective income tax rate increased from 47% in 2008 to 53% in 2009 primarily due to the increase in the amount of permanent differences in 2009 as compared to our pretax net income before income tax expense.

Multiple System Operator (“MSO”) Operating Statistics

Our operating statistics include capital expenditures and customer information from our Consumer and Commercial segments which offer services utilizing our cable services’ facilities.

The standardized definition of a customer relationship is the number of customers that receive at least one level of service utilizing our cable service facilities, encompassing voice, video, and data services, without regard to which services customers purchase. At December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008 we had 134,400, 133,900 and 133,400 customer relationships, respectively.

The standardized definition of a revenue generating unit is the sum of all primary analog video, digital video, high-speed data, and telephony customers, not counting additional outlets. At December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008 we had 350,100, 343,200 and 327,200 revenue generating units, respectively.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Our principal sources of current liquidity are cash and cash equivalents. We believe, but can provide no assurances, that we will be able to meet our current and long-term liquidity, capital requirements and fixed charges through our cash flows from operating activities, existing cash, cash equivalents, credit facilities, and other external financing and equity sources. Should operating cash flows be insufficient to support additional borrowings and principal payments scheduled under our existing credit facilities, capital expenditures will likely be reduced.

In January 2010 the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s RUS approved our wholly-owned subsidiary, UUI's application for an $88.2 million loan/grant combination to extend terrestrial broadband service for the first time to Bristol Bay and the Yukon-Kuskokwim Delta, an area in Alaska roughly the size of the state of North Dakota. Upon completion, TERRA-SW will be able to serve over 9,000 households and over 700 businesses in the 65 covered communities. The project will also be able to serve numerous public/nonprofit/private community anchor institutions and entities, such as regional health care providers, school districts, and other regional and Alaska Native organizations. The RUS award, consisting of a $44.2 million loan and a $44.0 million grant, will be made under the RUS Broadband Initiatives Program established pursuant to the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act. The award will fund backbone network facilities that we would not otherwise be able to construct within our return-on-investment requirements. UUI began construction on TERRA-SW in 2010 and expects to complete the project in 2012 or earlier if possible.

While our short-term and long-term financing abilities are believed to be adequate as a supplement to internally generated cash flows to fund capital expenditures and acquisitions as opportunities arise, the state of the global financial markets may negatively impact our ability to further access the capital markets in a timely manner and on attractive terms, which may have a negative impact on our ability to grow our business.

We monitor the third-party depository institutions that hold our cash and cash equivalents. Our emphasis is primarily on safety of principal and secondarily on maximizing yield on those funds.

Our net cash flows provided by and (used for) operating, investing and financing activities, as reflected in the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for 2010 and 2009, are summarized as follows (amounts in thousands):

	2010			2009
Operating activities	$	171,259			100,919
Investing activities		(104,722	)		(125,877	)
Financing activities		(82,902	)		43,407
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents	$	(16,365	)		18,449

Operating Activities

The increase in cash flows provided by operating activities is due primarily to an increase in operating income in 2010 as compared to 2009, a $12.3 million decrease in accounts receivable that is due to timing of receipt of payments and a $15.0 million contractually required payment made in 2009.

Investing Activities

Net cash used in investing activities consists primarily of cash paid for capital expenditures. Our most significant recurring investing activity has been capital expenditures and we expect that this will continue in the future. A significant portion of our capital expenditures is based on the level of customer growth and the technology being deployed. The decrease in cash flows used for investing activities is due primarily to a decrease in spending for property and equipment, including construction in progress in 2010 partially off-set by the final contingent payment of $5.2 million for the Alaska Wireless acquisition.

Our cash expenditures for property and equipment, including construction in progress, totaled $96.2 million and $121.0 million during the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. Our capital expenditures decreased in 2010 primarily due to the decreased pace of our wireless network expansion. We expect our 2011 expenditures for property and equipment for our core operations, including construction in progress, to total $145.0 million to $155.0 million, depending on available opportunities and the amount of cash flow we generate during 2011, and excluding grant funded capital expenditures related to our TERRA-SW project.

Financing Activities

Net cash used in financing activities consists primarily of our proceeds from borrowings off-set by our debt repayments, payment of debt issuance costs and repurchases of GCI’s common stock. Proceeds from borrowings fluctuate from year to year based on our liquidity needs. We may use excess cash to make optional repayments on our debt or repurchase GCI’s common stock depending on various factors, such as market conditions. The decrease in cash flows provided by financing activities is due to a decrease in long-term debt borrowings in 2010 compared to 2009 and an increase in repurchases of GCI’s common stock in 2010 compared to 2009.

Available Borrowings Under Senior Credit Facility

On January 29, 2010, we replaced our then existing Senior Credit Facility with a new amended Senior Credit Facility that provides a $75.0 million revolving credit facility and that extends the maturity through January 29, 2015. We have a $75.0 million revolving Senior Credit Facility with a $25.0 million sublimit for letters of credit. We have $20.0 million in long-term debt and $2.7 million of letters of credit outstanding, which leaves $52.3 million available for borrowing under the revolving credit facility as of December 31, 2010.

On January 18, 2011, we repaid $5.0 million of our outstanding long-term debt. On February 15, 2011, and February 25, 2011, we borrowed $8.0 million and $5.0 million, respectively, under our amended Senior Credit Facility. After consideration of these transactions, we have $44.3 million available for borrowing under our revolving credit facility.

Debt Covenants

We are subject to covenants and restrictions set forth in the indentures governing our 2014 and 2019 Notes, amended Senior Credit Facility, RUS loans, and CoBank loans. We are in compliance with the covenants, and we believe that neither the covenants nor the restrictions in our indentures or loan documents will limit our ability to operate our business.

Share Repurchases

GCI’s Board of Directors has authorized a common stock buyback program for the repurchase of GCI Class A and Class B common stock in order to reduce the outstanding shares of Class A and Class B common stock. Under this program, GCI is currently authorized to make up to $125.5 million of repurchases as of December 31, 2010. GCI is authorized to increase its stock repurchase limit $5.0 million per quarter indefinitely and to use stock option exercise proceeds to repurchase additional shares. If stock repurchases are less than the total approved quarterly amount the difference may be carried forward and applied against future stock repurchases. During the year ended December 31, 2010 we repurchased on GCI’s behalf 8.0 million shares of GCI common stock at a cost of $80.8 million. All of the shares were retired in 2010. The common stock buyback program is expected to continue for an indefinite period dependent on leverage, liquidity, company performance, market conditions and subject to continued oversight by GCI’s Board of Directors. The repurchases have and will continue to comply with the restrictions of SEC Rule 10b-18.

Schedule of Certain Known Contractual Obligations

The following table details future projected payments associated with certain known contractual obligations as of December 31, 2010:

	Payments Due by Period
	Total		Less than 1 Year		1 to 3		4 to 5		More Than 5 Years
	Total		Less than 1 Year		Years		Years		More Than 5 Years
	(Amounts in thousands)
Long-term debt	$	786,676		2,516		5,073		344,247		434,840
Interest on long-term debt		432,399		62,860		125,123		90,040		154,376
Capital lease obligations, including interest		137,130		11,672		23,474		23,513		78,471
Operating lease commitments		151,401		21,495		33,924		28,467		67,515
Purchase obligations		30,939		18,554		9,143		3,242		-
Total contractual obligations	$	1,538,545		117,097		196,737		489,509		735,202

Long-term debt listed in the table above includes principal payments on our amended Senior Credit Facility, 2014 and 2019 Notes, Rural Utilities Services debt and CoBank Mortgage note payable. Interest on the amount outstanding under our amended Senior Credit Facility is based on variable rates. We used the current rate paid on the amended Senior Credit Facility to estimate our future interest payments. Our 2014 Notes require semi-annual interest payments of $11.6 million through February 2014 and our 2019 Notes require semi-annual interest payments of $18.3 million through November 2019. Our Rural Utilities Services debt and CoBank Mortgage note payable have fixed interest rates ranging from 2.0% to 6.8%. For a discussion of our 2014 and 2019 Notes, amended Senior Credit Facility, Rural Utilities Services debt and CoBank Mortgage note payable see note 6 in the accompanying “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.”

Capital lease obligations include our obligation to lease transponder capacity on Galaxy 18. For a discussion of our capital and operating leases, see note 12 in the accompanying “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.”

Purchase obligations include the following:

·	A non-cancelable commitment to purchase hardware and software capable of providing wireless service to small markets in rural Alaska of $4.8 million, and

Cancelable open purchase orders for goods and services for capital projects and normal operations totaling $15.0 million which are not included in our Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 31, 2010, because the goods had not been received or the services had not been performed at December 31, 2010.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We have not created, and are not party to, any special-purpose or off-balance sheet entities for the purpose of raising capital, incurring debt or operating parts of our business that are not consolidated into our financial statements. We do not have any arrangements or relationships with entities that are not consolidated into our financial statements that are reasonably likely to materially affect our liquidity or the availability of our capital resources.

New Accounting Standards

Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2009-13 addresses the accounting for multiple deliverable arrangements to enable vendors to account for products or services (“deliverables”) separately rather than as a combined unit. Specifically, this guidance amends the criteria in Subtopic 605-25, “Revenue Recognition - Multiple-Element Arrangements”, for separating consideration in multiple-deliverable arrangements. This guidance establishes a selling price hierarchy for determining the selling price of a deliverable, which is based on: (a) vendor-specific objective evidence; (b) third-party evidence; or (c) estimates. This guidance also eliminates the residual method of allocation and requires that arrangement consideration be allocated at the inception of the arrangement to all deliverables using the relative selling price method. In addition, this guidance significantly expands required disclosures related to a vendor's multiple-deliverable revenue arrangements. ASU 2009-13 is effective prospectively for revenue arrangements entered into or materially modified in fiscal years beginning on or after June 15, 2010. The adoption of ASU 2009-13 is not expected to have a material impact on our statement of operations, financial position or cash flows.

In December 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-28 “Intangibles—Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): When to Perform Step 2 of the Goodwill Impairment Test for Reporting Units with Zero or Negative Carrying Amounts”. Under ASU 2010-28, if the carrying amount of a reporting unit is zero or negative, an entity must assess whether it is more likely than not that goodwill impairment exists. To make that determination, an entity should consider whether there are adverse qualitative factors that could impact the amount of goodwill, including those listed in ASC 350-20-35-30. As a result of the new guidance, an entity can no longer assert that a reporting unit is not required to perform the second step of the goodwill impairment test because the carrying amount of the reporting unit is zero or negative, despite the existence of qualitative factors that indicate goodwill is more likely than not impaired. ASU 2010-28 is effective for public entities for fiscal years, and for interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2010, with early adoption prohibited. The adoption of ASU 2009-28 is not expected to have a material impact on our statement of operations, financial position or cash flows.

In December 2010, the FASB issued the ASU 2010-29 “Business Combinations (Topic 805): Disclosure of Supplementary Pro Forma Information for Business Combinations”. ASU 2010-29 specifies that if a public entity presents comparative financial statements, the entity should disclose revenue and earnings of the combined entity as though the business combination(s) that occurred during the current year had occurred as of the beginning of the comparable prior annual reporting period only. The amendments in this Update also expand the supplemental pro forma disclosures under Topic 805 to include a description of the nature and amount of material, nonrecurring pro forma adjustments directly attributable to the business combination included in the reported pro forma revenue and earnings. The amended guidance is effective prospectively for business combinations for which the acquisition date is on or after the beginning of the first annual reporting period beginning on or after December 15, 2010. Early adoption is permitted. The adoption of ASU 2009-29 is not expected to have a material impact on our statement of operations, financial position or cash flows.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

Our accounting and reporting policies comply with GAAP. The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions. The financial position and results of operations can be affected by these estimates and assumptions, which are integral to understanding reported results. Critical accounting policies and estimates are those policies and estimates that management believes are the most important to the portrayal of our financial condition and results, and require management to make estimates that are difficult, subjective or complex. Most accounting policies and estimates are not considered by management to be critical. Several factors are considered in determining whether or not a policy or estimate is critical in the preparation of financial statements. These factors include, among other things, whether the estimates are significant to the financial statements, the nature of the estimates, the ability to readily validate the estimates with other information including third parties or available prices, and sensitivity of the estimates to changes in economic conditions and whether alternative accounting methods may be utilized under GAAP. For all of these policies and estimates, management cautions that future events rarely develop exactly as forecast, and the best estimates routinely require adjustment. Management has discussed the development and the selection of critical accounting policies and estimates with GCI’s Audit Committee.

Those policies and estimates considered to be critical for the years ended December 31, 2010 are described below.

Revenue Recognition

The accounting estimates related to revenues from the high cost, rural health and schools and libraries USF programs are dependent on various inputs including current line counts, the most current rates paid to us, and our assessment of the impact of new FCC regulations, the potential outcome of FCC proceedings and the potential outcome of USAC contract reviews. Some of the inputs are subjective and based on our judgment regarding the outcome of certain variables and are subject to upward or downward adjustment in subsequent periods. Significant changes to our estimates could result in material changes to the revenues we have recorded and could have a material effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

Allowance for Doubtful Receivables

We maintain allowances for doubtful receivables for estimated losses resulting from the inability of our customers to make required payments. We also maintain an allowance for doubtful receivables based on notification that a customer may not have satisfactorily complied with rules necessary to obtain supplemental funding from the USAC for services provided by us under our packaged communications offerings to rural hospitals, health clinics and school districts. We base our estimates on the aging of our accounts receivable balances, financial health of specific customers, regional economic data, changes in our collections process, regulatory requirements, and our customers’ compliance with USAC rules. If the financial condition of our customers were to deteriorate or if they are unable to emerge from reorganization proceedings, resulting in an impairment of their ability to make payments, additional allowances may be required. If their financial condition improves or they emerge successfully from reorganization proceedings, allowances may be reduced. Such allowance changes could have a material effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

Impairment and Useful Lives of Intangible Assets

We had $291.5 million of indefinite-lived intangible assets at December 31, 2010 consisting of cable certificates of $191.6 million, goodwill of $73.9 million and wireless licenses of $26.0 million. Our indefinite-lived intangible assets are tested annually for impairment during the fourth quarter and at any time upon the occurrence of certain events or substantive changes in circumstances.

We are required to determine goodwill impairment using a two-step process. The first step of the goodwill impairment test is used to identify potential impairment by comparing the fair value of a reporting unit with its carrying amount. If the carrying amount of a reporting unit exceeds its fair value, the second step of the goodwill impairment test compares the implied fair value of the reporting unit's goodwill with the carrying amount of that goodwill. If the carrying amount of the reporting unit's goodwill exceeds the implied fair value of that goodwill, an impairment loss is recognized in an amount equal to that excess. The implied fair value of goodwill is determined in the same manner as the amount of goodwill that would be recognized in a business combination.

The impairment test for identifiable indefinite-lived intangible assets consists of a comparison of the estimated fair value of the intangible asset with its carrying value. If the carrying value of the intangible asset exceeds its fair value, an impairment loss is recognized in an amount equal to that excess.

Our cable certificates are our largest indefinite-lived intangible asset and represent agreements with government entities to construct and operate a cable business. The value of our cable certificates is derived from the economic benefits we receive from the right to solicit new customers and to market new services. The amount we have recorded for cable certificates is primarily from cable system acquisitions. The cable certificates are valued under a direct discounted cash flow method whereby the cash flow associated with existing customers is isolated after appropriate contributory asset charges and then projected based on an analysis of customer churn and attrition characteristics.

Our wireless licenses are from the FCC and give us the right to provide wireless service within a certain geographical area. The amount we have recorded is from acquisitions of wireless companies and auctions of wireless spectrum. We use comparable market transactions from recent FCC auctions, as appropriate, and a hypothetical build-up method to value our wireless licenses.

Goodwill represents the excess of cost over fair value of net assets acquired in connection with a business acquisition. We use an income approach to determine the fair value of our reporting units for purposes of our goodwill impairment test. In addition, a market-based approach is used where possible to corroborate the fair values determined by the income approach.

The direct discounted cash flow, hypothetical build-up, and income approach valuation methods require us to make estimates and assumptions including projected cash flows, discount rate, customer churn, and customer behaviors and attrition. These estimates and assumptions could have a significant impact on whether an impairment charge is recognized and the magnitude of any such impairment charge. Fair value estimates are made at a specific point in time, based on relevant information. These estimates are subjective in nature and involve uncertainties and matters of significant judgment and therefore cannot be determined with precision. Changes in assumptions could significantly affect the estimates. Events and factors that may be out of our control that could affect the estimates include such things as competitive forces, customer behaviors, change in revenue growth trends, cost structures and technology, and changes in discount rates, performance compared to peers, material and ongoing negative economic trends, and specific industry or market sector conditions. Our company is operated and managed with two balance sheets, however, our impairment tests must be performed at the reporting unit level, which requires us to allocate our balance sheet. These allocations are subjective and require a significant amount of judgment. Changes to the assumptions and allocation methodologies could significantly change our estimates. We may also record impairments in the future if there are changes in long-term market conditions, expected future operating results, or laws and regulations that may prevent us from recovering the carrying value of our goodwill, cable certificates, and wireless licenses.

We have allocated all of the goodwill to our reporting units and based on our annual impairment test as of October 31, 2010, the fair value of each reporting unit exceeded the book value by a range between 60% and 853%. The reporting unit that exceeded the book value by 60% passed the goodwill impairment test by $21.4 million, which we believe is a large margin. We believe none of our reporting units were close to failing step one of the goodwill impairment test.

Based on our annual impairment test as of October 31, 2010, the fair value of our wireless licenses exceeded the book value by 204%. The fair value of our cable certificates exceeded the book value by 22% and $42.4 million as of October 31, 2010, which we believe is a large margin. We believe that none of our indefinite lived intangible assets were close to failing the impairment test.

Accruals for Unbilled Costs

We estimate unbilled long-distance and wireless services Cost of Goods Sold based upon minutes of use carried through our network and established rates. We estimate unbilled costs for new circuits and services, and network changes that result in traffic routing changes or a change in carriers. Carriers that provide service to us regularly make network changes that can lead to new, revised or corrected billings. Such estimates are revised or removed when subsequent billings are received, payments are made, billing matters are researched and resolved, tariffed billing periods lapse, or when disputed charges are resolved. Revisions to previous estimates could either increase or decrease costs in the year in which the estimate is revised which could have a material effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

Valuation Allowance for Net Operating Loss Deferred Tax Assets

Our income tax policy provides for deferred income taxes to show the effect of temporary differences between the recognition of revenue and expenses for financial and income tax reporting purposes and between the tax basis of assets and liabilities and their reported amounts in the financial statements. We have recorded deferred tax assets of $89.0 million associated with income tax net operating losses that were generated from 1996 to 2010, and that primarily expire from 2011 to 2030, and with charitable contributions that were converted to net operating losses in 2004 to 2010, and that expire in 2024 to 2030, respectively. Pre-acquisition income tax net operating losses associated with acquired companies are subject to additional deductibility limits. We have recorded deferred tax assets of $1.9 million associated with alternative minimum tax credits that do not expire. Significant management judgment is required in developing our provision for income taxes, including the determination of deferred tax assets and liabilities and any valuation allowances that may be required against the deferred tax assets. We have not recorded a valuation allowance on the deferred tax assets as of December 31, 2010 based on management’s belief that future reversals of existing taxable temporary differences and estimated future taxable income exclusive of reversing temporary differences and carryforwards will, more likely than not, be sufficient to realize the benefit of these assets over time. In the event that actual results differ from these estimates or if our historical trends change, we may be required to record a valuation allowance on deferred tax assets, which could have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position or results of operations.

Other significant accounting policies, not involving the same level of measurement uncertainties as those discussed above, are nevertheless important to an understanding of the financial statements. A complete discussion of our significant accounting policies can be found in note 1 in the accompanying “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.”

Regulatory Developments

See “Part I — Item 1 — Business — Regulation” for more information about regulatory developments affecting us.

Inflation

We do not believe that inflation has a significant effect on our operations.

Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

We are exposed to various types of market risk in the normal course of business, including the impact of interest rate changes. We do not hold derivatives for trading purposes. Our amended Senior Credit Facility carries interest rate risk. Amounts borrowed under this Agreement bear interest at LIBOR plus 4.00% or less depending upon our Total Leverage Ratio (as defined). Should the LIBOR rate change, our interest expense will increase or decrease accordingly. As of December 31, 2010, we have borrowed $20.0 million subject to interest rate risk. On this amount, each 1% increase in the LIBOR interest rate would result in $200,000 of additional gross interest cost on an annualized basis.

Item 8. Consolidated Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

Our consolidated financial statements are filed under this Item, beginning on page 60. Our supplementary data is filed under Item 7, beginning on page 35.

Item 9. Changes In and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

None.

Item 9A. Controls and Procedures

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

We maintain disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in reports that we file or submit under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Exchange Act”) is recorded, processed, summarized, accumulated and communicated to our management, including our principal executive and financial officers, to allow timely decisions regarding required financial disclosure, and reported as specified in the SEC’s rules and forms. As of the end of the period covered by this Annual Report on Form 10-K, we carried out an evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and

operation of our “disclosure controls and procedures” (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a - 15(e)) under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer. Based on that evaluation and as described below under “Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting", our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer, concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective as of December 31, 2010.

The certifications attached as Exhibits 31 and 32 to this report should be read in conjunction with the disclosures set forth herein.

Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(f). Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer, we conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting based on the framework in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations (COSO).

Based on our evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting, our management concluded that as of December 31, 2010, we did not maintain effective internal control over financial reporting due to a material weakness associated with inadequately designed internal controls in our financial reporting process related to the USF high cost program support revenue accrual. Our revenue and accounts receivable were corrected prior to the issuance of our consolidated financial statements included in Part I, Item I of our June 30, 2010 quarterly report. The impact of this error was deemed to be immaterial in the prior periods.

Management’s Plan for Remediation of Material Weakness

In the third quarter of 2010, we began remediation of our inadequately designed internal controls in our financial reporting process related to the USF high cost program support revenue accrual by strengthening the design and operation of our controls over the preparation and review of the accrual. Specifically, we have replaced and reorganized the staff responsible for the USF high cost support revenue to ensure more focus on our USF high cost support revenue. We have reviewed and, as appropriate, changed the accrual preparation and review process for USF high cost support revenue. Additionally, the updated process has been documented to ensure consistent application. Our remediation efforts continued in the fourth quarter of 2010 and will continue in 2011.

Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

As described above in the second quarter of 2010 we identified a material weakness associated with inadequately designed internal controls in our financial reporting process related to the USF high cost program support revenue accrual. We began remediation in the third quarter of 2010 by strengthening the design and operation of our controls over the preparation and review of the USF high cost program support revenue accrual. Our remediation efforts continued in the fourth quarter of 2010 and will continue in 2011.

On November 4, 2010 we implemented a new cable video billing system. The implementation of the new system has resulted in certain changes to our processes and procedures affecting internal control over financial reporting during the fourth quarter of 2010. We have documented processes and tested internal controls over the new billing system. Due to the complexities of implementing a new billing system we expect to continue to monitor and evaluate the new system for several months. We believe we have the processes and appropriate management in place to effectively perform the monitoring and evaluation duties.

Except as described above there were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-13(f) and 15d-15(f) of the Exchange Act) identified in connection with the evaluation of our controls performed during the quarter ended December 31, 2010 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

A company's internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with GAAP. A company's internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately

and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with GAAP, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Internal control over financial reporting has inherent limitations. Internal control over financial reporting is a process that involves human diligence and compliance and is subject to lapses in judgment and breakdowns resulting from human failures. Internal control over financial reporting also can be circumvented by collusion or improper management override. Because of such limitations, there is a risk that material misstatements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis by internal control over financial reporting. However, these inherent limitations are known features of the financial reporting process. Therefore, it is possible to design into the process safeguards to reduce, though not eliminate, this risk.

We may enhance, modify, and supplement internal controls and disclosure controls and procedures based on experience.

Item 9B. Other Information

None.

Part III

Items 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14 are omitted per General Instruction I(1)(a) and (b) of Form 10-K.

Part IV

Item 15. Exhibits, Consolidated Financial Statement Schedules


(I) Consolidated Financial Statements		Page No.

Included in Part II of this Report:

	Reports of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firms	64

	Consolidated Balance Sheets, December 31, 2010 and 2009	66

	Consolidated Statements of Operations, years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008	68

	Consolidated Statements of Stockholder’s Equity, years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008	69

	Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008	70

	Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements	71

(2) Consolidated Financial Statement Schedules

	Schedules are omitted, as they are not required or are not applicable, or the required information is shown in the applicable financial statements or notes thereto.

(3) Exhibits		106

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

Board of Directors and Stockholder

GCI, Inc.

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of GCI, Inc. (an Alaska corporation) (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2010 and 2009, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholder’s equity, and cash flows for each of the two years in the period ended December 31, 2010. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of GCI, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2010 and 2009, and the consolidated results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the two years in the period ended December 31, 2010, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

(signed) Grant Thornton LLP

Seattle, Washington

March 14, 2011

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of Directors and Stockholder

GCI, Inc.:

We have audited the accompanying consolidated statements of operations, stockholder’s equity, and cash flows of GCI, Inc. and subsidiaries (the Company) for the year ended December 31, 2008. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the results of operations and cash flows of GCI, Inc. and subsidiaries for the year ended December 31, 2008, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

(signed) KPMG, LLP

Anchorage, Alaska

March 20, 2009 except for Note 13,

as to which the date is October 19, 2009





GCI, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS



(Amounts in thousands)	December 31,
ASSETS	2010		2009

Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	31,777		48,142

Receivables		132,856		147,859
Less allowance for doubtful receivables		9,189		7,060
Net receivables		123,667		140,799

Deferred income taxes		10,145		17,618
Prepaid expenses		5,950		4,491
Inventories		5,804		9,278
Other current assets		3,940		5,872
Total current assets		181,282		226,200

Property and equipment in service, net of depreciation		798,278		823,080
Construction in progress		31,144		26,161
Net property and equipment		829,422		849,241

Cable certificates		191,635		191,565
Goodwill		73,932		73,452
Wireless licenses		25,967		25,967
Other intangible assets, net of amortization		17,717		19,561
Deferred loan and senior notes costs, net of amortization of $6,469 and $4,662 at December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively		13,661		13,168
Other assets		16,850		18,609
Total other assets		339,762		342,322
Total assets	$	1,350,467		1,417,763

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.



			(Continued)

GCI, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(Continued)



(Amounts in thousands)	December 31,
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY	2010			2009

Current liabilities:
Current maturities of obligations under long-term debt and capital leases	$	7,652			9,892
Accounts payable		35,589			30,697
Deferred revenue		17,296			21,404
Accrued payroll and payroll related obligations		22,132			21,874
Accrued interest		13,456			14,821
Accrued liabilities		12,557			15,037
Subscriber deposits		1,271			1,549
Total current liabilities		109,953			115,274

Long-term debt, net		779,201			771,247
Obligations under capital leases, excluding current maturities		84,144			89,279
Obligation under capital lease due to related party		1,885			1,876
Deferred income taxes		102,401			100,386
Long-term deferred revenue		49,175			52,342
Other liabilities		24,495			21,676
Total liabilities		1,151,254			1,152,080

Commitments and contingencies
Stockholder’s equity:
Class A common stock (no par). Authorized 10 shares; issued and outstanding 0.1 shares at December 31, 2010 and 2009		206,622			206,622
Paid-in capital		54,574			49,165
Retained earnings (deficit)		(61,983	)		9,896
Total stockholders’ equity		199,213			265,683
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	1,350,467			1,417,763

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

GCI INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 2010, 2009, AND 2008




(Amounts in thousands)	2010			2009			2008
Revenues	$	651,250			595,811			575,442
Cost of goods sold (exclusive of depreciation and
amortization shown separately below)		207,817			193,676			203,058
Selling, general and administrative expenses		228,808			212,671			210,306
Depreciation and amortization expense		126,114			123,362			114,369
Operating income		88,511			66,102			47,709

Other income (expense):
Interest expense (including amortization and write-off
of deferred loan fees)		(70,329	)		(58,761	)		(50,363	)
Interest and investment income		261			111			576
Other		-			-			(217	)
Other expense, net		(70,068	)		(58,650	)		(50,004	)
Income (loss) before income tax expense		18,443			7,452			(2,295	)
Income tax expense		9,488			3,936			1,077

Net income (loss)		8,955			3,516			(3,372	)
Net loss attributable to the non-controlling interest		-			-			1,503
Net income (loss) attributable to GCI, Inc.	$	8,955			3,516			(1,869	)

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements

GCI, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDER'S EQUITY

YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2010, 2009 AND 2008

(Amounts in thousands, except share amounts)	Shares of Class A Common Stock	Class A Common Stock	Paid-in Capital	Retained Earnings (Deficit)		Non-controlling Interest		Total
Balances at January 1, 2008	100	206,622	37,804	8,529		6,478		259,433
Net loss	---	---	---	(1,869	)	(1,503	)	(3,372)
Acquisition of remaining shares of non-controlling interest	---	---	---	---		(4,975	)	(4,975)
Distribution to General Communication, Inc.	---	---	---	(46	)	---		(46)
Contribution from General Communication, Inc.	---	---	7,664	---		---		7,664
Balances at December 31, 2008	100	206,622	45,468	6,614		---		258,704
Net income	---	---	---	3,516		---		3,516
Distribution to General Communication, Inc.	---	---	---	(234	)	---		(234)
Contribution from General Communication, Inc.	---	---	3,697	---		---		3,697
Balances at December 31, 2009	100	206,622	49,165	9,896		---		265,683
Net income	---	---	---	8,955		---		8,955
Distribution to General Communication, Inc.	---	---	---	(80,834)		---		(80,834)
Contribution from General Communication, Inc.	---	---	5,409	---		---		5,409
Balances at December 31, 2010	100	206,622	54,574	(61,983)		---		199,213

GCI, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2010, 2009 AND 2008



(Amounts in thousands)	2010			2009			2008
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income (loss)	$	8,955			3,516			(3,372	)
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash
provided by operating activities, net of effect of acquisitions:
Depreciation and amortization expense		126,114			123,362			114,369
Deferred income tax expense		9,488			3,936			1,077
Share-based compensation expense		6,733			2,804			7,278
Other noncash income and expense items		6,725			14,919			8,896
Change in operating assets and liabilities, net of effect of acquisitions		13,244			(47,618	)		47,087
Net cash provided by operating activities		171,259			100,919			175,335
Cash flows from investing activities:
Purchases of property and equipment, including construction period interest		(96,194	)		(120,983	)		(221,458	)
Purchase of businesses and non-controlling interest, net of cash received		(5,545	)		(109	)		(65,335	)
Purchase of marketable securities		941			(305	)		-
Proceeds from sale of marketable securities		(202	)		613			4,800
Insurance proceeds		990			-			-
Purchases of other assets and intangible assets		(4,712	)		(5,093	)		(8,974	)
Net cash used in investing activities		(104,722	)		(125,877	)		(290,967	)
Cash flows from financing activities:
Issuance of 2019 Senior Notes		-			421,473			-
Repayment of debt and capital lease obligations		(35,974	)		(402,710	)		(10,248	)
Borrowing on long-term debt		6,206			3,884			114,486
Payment of debt issuance costs		(2,300	)		(9,006	)		(2,118	)
Borrowing on Senior Credit Facility		30,000			30,000			30,000
Net contribution (distribution) to General Communication, Inc.		(80,834	)		(234	)		157
Other		-			189			(26	)
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities		(82,902	)		43,407			132,251
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents		(16,365	)		18,449			16,619
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period		48,142			29,693			13,074
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	31,777			48,142			29,693



See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

GCI, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(1) Business and Summary of Significant Accounting Principles

In the following discussion, GCI, Inc. and its direct and indirect subsidiaries are referred to as “we,” “us” and “our.”

(a)

Business

We offer the following services:

·	Origination and termination of traffic in Alaska for certain common carriers,

·	Cable television services throughout Alaska,

·	Competitive local access services throughout Alaska,

·	Incumbent local access services in areas of rural Alaska,

·	Long-distance telephone service,

·	Sale of postpaid and prepaid wireless telephone services and sale of wireless telephone handsets and accessories,

·	Data network services,

·	Internet access services,

·	Wireless roaming for certain wireless carriers,

·	Broadband services, including our SchoolAccess® offering to rural school districts, our ConnectMD® offering to rural hospitals and health clinics, and managed video conferencing,

·	Managed services to certain commercial customers,

·	Sales and service of dedicated communications systems and related equipment, and

·	Lease, service arrangements and maintenance of capacity on our fiber optic cable systems used in the transmission of voice and data services within Alaska and between Alaska and the remaining United States and foreign countries.

(b)

Principles of Consolidation

The consolidated financial statements include the consolidated accounts of GCI, Inc. and its wholly-owned subsidiaries, as well as a variable interest entity in which we were the primary beneficiary prior to August 18, 2008 when we acquired the remaining 18.1% equity interest and voting control of Alaska DigiTel, LLC (“Alaska DigiTel”). All significant intercompany transactions between non-regulated affiliates of our company are eliminated. Intercompany transactions generated between regulated and non-regulated affiliates of our company are not eliminated in consolidation.

(c)

Acquisitions

Effective June 1, 2008, we closed on our purchase of 100% of the outstanding stock of United Utilities, Inc. (“UUI”) and Unicom, Inc. (“Unicom”), which were subsidiaries of United Companies, Inc. (“UCI”). UUI, together with its subsidiary, United-KUC, Inc. (“United-KUC”), provides local telephone service to 60 rural communities in the Bethel, Alaska area. Unicom operates DeltaNet, a long-haul broadband microwave network ringing the Yukon-Kuskokwim Delta. This investment expanded our Managed Broadband services in rural Alaska. The UUI and Unicom acquisition were stock purchases but we elected to treat them as an asset purchase for income tax purposes, resulting in goodwill being deductible for tax purposes.

Effective July 1, 2008, we closed on our purchase of 100% of the ownership interests of Alaska Wireless Communications, LLC (“Alaska Wireless”), which provides wireless and Internet services in the Dutch Harbor, Sand Point, Akutan, and Adak, Alaska areas. Such purchase was treated as an asset purchase for income tax purposes. This investment expanded our wireless services in the Aleutian Chain region of rural Alaska. We consider this business combination to be immaterial to our consolidated financial statements.

On August 18, 2008, we exercised our option to acquire the remaining 18.1% of the equity interest and voting control of Alaska DigiTel for $10.4 million. Prior to August 18, 2008, our ability to control the operations of Alaska DigiTel was limited as required by the Federal Communications Commission (“FCC”) upon their approval of our initial acquisition of 81.9% of the non-controlling equity interest obtained in January

(Continued)

GCI, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

2007. Subsequent to the acquisition of the non-controlling interest, we own 100% of the outstanding common ownership units and voting control of Alaska DigiTel. Such purchase was treated as an asset purchase for income tax purposes. We purchased Alaska DigiTel as a way to participate in the future growth of the Alaska wireless industry. We consolidated 100% of Alaska DigiTel's assets and liabilities at fair value beginning on January 1, 2007, when we determined that Alaska DigiTel was a variable interest entity of which we were the primary beneficiary. Upon our acquisition of the non-controlling interest in Alaska DigiTel on August 18, 2008, we recorded 18.1% of the change in fair value between the assets and liabilities on January 1, 2007 and the fair value of the assets and liabilities on August 18, 2008.

On the closing date of the UUI and Unicom acquisition, $8.0 million of the purchase price was deposited in an escrow account to compensate us for any indemnification claims we may have after the acquisition and was included in the purchase price. As of December 31, 2010, $2.0 million remained in the escrow account, the balance of which was released in January 2011.

We have agreed to make additional payments for UUI and Unicom in each of the years 2009 through 2013 that are contingent on sequential year-over-year revenue growth for specified customers. During the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, we paid an additional $388,000 and $109,000, respectively, to the former shareholders of UUI. As of December 31, 2010, we have recorded an accrual of $480,000 for contingent consideration to the former shareholders of UUI. We made an additional $5.2 million payment for Alaska Wireless in 2010 that was contingent on meeting certain financial conditions. We are unable to reasonably estimate the remaining contingent consideration amounts that may be paid for the UUI acquisition, but do not believe any amount paid will be significant.

Our business acquisitions and the acquisition of the non-controlling interest in Alaska DigiTel were recorded with the purchase price allocated based on the fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed. In addition, the acquired companies' results of operations are included since the effective date of each acquisition.

The purchase prices, including contingent payments, for our 2008 acquisitions, net of cash received of approximately $1.7 million from UUI and Unicom, are as follows (amounts in thousands):


	As Originally Reported at December 31, 2008		Adjustments		Revised Purchase Price at December 31, 2010
UUI and Unicom	$	40,575		977		41,552
Alaska Wireless	$	14,508		5,157		19,665
Alaska DigiTel	$	10,434		-		10,434

The purchase price for the UUI and Unicom acquisition had been allocated at December 31, 2009. During the year ended December 31, 2010, we accrued an additional contingency payment to UUI of $480,000. Therefore our allocation of the purchase price at December 31, 2009 has been adjusted for this consideration and is as follows (amounts in thousands):


	Originally Recorded at December 31, 2008		Adjustments		Revised Balance at December 31, 2009		Adjustments		Revised Balance at December 31, 2010
Current assets	$	15,008		-		15,008		-		15,008
Property and equipment, including construction in progress		59,629		68		59,697		-		59,697
Intangible assets		8,175		-		8,175		-		8,175
Wireless licenses		100		-		100		-		100
Goodwill		9,102		1,427		10,529		480		11,009
Deferred income taxes		-		679		679		-		679
Other assets		3,106		-		3,106		-		3,106
Total assets acquired		95,120		2,174		97,294		480		97,774
Current liabilities		4,916		96		5,012		-		5,012
Long-term debt, including current portion		43,614		-		43,614		-		43,614
Other long-term liabilities		4,335		1,581		5,916		-		5,916
Total liabilities assumed		52,865		1,677		54,542		-		54,542
Net assets acquired	$	42,255		497		42,752		480		43,232

The purchase price for the Alaska DigiTel acquisition has been finalized and allocated as of December 31, 2008 as follows (amounts in thousands):

Current assets	$	2,220
Property and equipment, including construction in progress		6,015
Intangible assets		1,468
Wireless licenses		4,396
Goodwill		4,534
Other assets		1
Total assets acquired		18,634
Current liabilities		2,588
Long-term debt, including current portion		5,515
Other long-term liabilities		97
Total liabilities assumed		8,200
Net assets acquired	$	10,434

Goodwill increased $480,000 at December 31, 2010 as compared to December 31, 2009 due to a contingent payment to UUI. Goodwill increased $6.6 million at December 31, 2009 as compared to December 31, 2008, primarily to record a $930,000 adjustment for grant deferred revenue to the UUI and Unicom purchase price allocations and for additional $5.2 million and $497,000 contingent payments to Alaska Wireless and UUI, respectively.

We modified the initial preliminary UUI and Unicom purchase price allocation during 2008 by increasing current assets $548,000, decreasing property and equipment $8.5 million, increasing intangible

(Continued)

GCI, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

assets $1.7 million, increasing goodwill $3.1 million, increasing other assets $695,000, increasing current liabilities $464,000, increasing long-term debt $910,000, and decreasing other long-term liabilities $3.9 million for adjustments due to the refinement of the estimated fair value.

We modified the initial preliminary Alaska DigiTel purchase price allocation for the purchase of the non-controlling interest during 2008 by decreasing property and equipment $202,000, increasing intangible assets $503,000, decreasing goodwill $88,000, and increasing liabilities $253,000 for adjustments to the fair value of the fixed assets and intangibles due to refinement of the valuation. An adjustment to the fair value of the liabilities was due to refinement of the estimated fair value.

All of our 2008 acquisitions resulted in goodwill which is deductible over 15 years for income tax purposes.

Revenues from the date of acquisition, net of intercompany revenue, for our acquisitions of UUI, Unicom, Alaska DigiTel and Alaska Wireless are allocated to our Consumer, Network Access, Managed Broadband, and Regulated Operations segments.

The following unaudited pro forma financial information is presented as if we had acquired the companies as of the beginning of the period presented. The pro forma results of operation as if the acquisitions occurred on January 1, 2008 for the year ended December 31, 2008 is as follows (amount in thousands, unaudited):

Pro forma consolidated revenue		$	588,691
Pro forma net loss		$	(2,932	)

(d) Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

(Continued)

GCI, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

current year had occurred as of the beginning of the comparable prior annual reporting period only. The amendments in this update also expand the supplemental pro forma disclosures under Topic 805 to include a description of the nature and amount of material, nonrecurring pro forma adjustments directly attributable to the business combination included in the reported pro forma revenue and earnings. The amended guidance is effective prospectively for business combinations for which the acquisition date is on or after the beginning of the first annual reporting period beginning on or after December 15, 2010. Early adoption is permitted. The adoption of ASU 2009-29 is not expected to have a material impact on our statement of operations, financial position or cash flows.

(e) Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements

ASU 2009-17 addresses a revision to former SFAS No. 167, “Amendments to FASB Interpretation No. 46(R)” ("SFAS 167"). ASU 2009-17 amends previous accounting related to the consolidation of variable interest entities ("VIE") to require an enterprise to qualitatively assess the determination of the primary beneficiary of a variable interest entity based on whether the entity (1) has the power to direct the activities of a VIE that most significantly impact the entity’s economic performance and (2) has the obligation to absorb losses of the entity or the right to receive benefits from the entity that could potentially be significant to the VIE. Also, SFAS No. 167 requires an ongoing reconsideration of the primary beneficiary, and amends the events that trigger a reassessment of whether an entity is a VIE. Enhanced disclosures are also required to provide information about an enterprise’s involvement in a VIE. The adoption of ASU 2009-17 on January 1, 2010, did not have a material impact on our statement of operations, financial position or cash flows.

ASU No. 2010-06, “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (Topic 820): Improving Disclosures about Fair Value Measurements” requires new disclosures and clarifies existing disclosure requirements about fair value measurement as set forth in Codification Subtopic 820-10. The FASB’s objective is to improve these disclosures and, thus, increase the transparency in financial reporting. Specifically, ASU 2010-06 amends Codification Subtopic 820-10 to now require that (a) a reporting entity should disclose separately the amounts of significant transfers in and out of Level 1 and Level 2 fair value measurements and describe the reasons for the transfers; and (b) in the reconciliation for fair value measurements using significant unobservable inputs, a reporting entity should present separately information about purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements. In addition, ASU 2010-06 clarifies the requirements of the following existing disclosures:

·	For purposes of reporting fair value measurement for each class of assets and liabilities, a reporting entity needs to use judgment in determining the appropriate classes of assets and liabilities; and

·	A reporting entity should provide disclosures about the valuation techniques and inputs used to measure fair value for both recurring and nonrecurring fair value measurements.

We adopted ASU 2010-06 as of January 1, 2010, except for the disclosures about purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements in the roll forward of activity in Level 3 fair value measurements. Those disclosures are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2010, and for interim periods within those fiscal years. Early application is permitted. The adoption of ASU 2010-06 did not have a material impact on our statement of operations, financial position or cash flow.

(f)

Regulatory Accounting and Regulation

We account for our regulated operations in accordance with the accounting principles for regulated enterprises. This accounting recognizes the economic effects of rate regulation by recording cost and a return on investment as such amounts are recovered through rates authorized by regulatory authorities. Accordingly, plant and equipment is depreciated over lives approved by regulators and certain costs and obligations are deferred based upon approvals received from regulators to permit recovery of such amounts in future years. Our cost studies and depreciation rates for our regulated operations are subject to periodic audits that could result in a change to recorded revenues.

(Continued)

GCI, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(g)

Earnings per Common Share

We are a wholly-owned subsidiary of GCI and, accordingly, are not required to present earnings per share. Our common stock is not publicly traded.

(h)

Cash Equivalents

Cash equivalents consist of overnight sweep investments and certificates of deposit which have an original maturity of three months or less at the date acquired and are readily convertible into cash.

(i)

Accounts Receivable and Allowance for Doubtful Receivables

Trade accounts receivable are recorded at the invoiced amount and do not bear interest. The allowance for doubtful receivables is our best estimate of the amount of probable credit losses in our existing accounts receivable. We base our estimates on the aging of our accounts receivable balances, financial health of specific customers, regional economic data, changes in our collections process, regulatory requirements, and our customers’ compliance with Universal Service Administrative Company ("USAC") rules. We review our allowance for doubtful receivables methodology at least annually.

Depending upon the type of account receivable our allowance is calculated using a pooled basis with an allowance for all accounts greater than 120 days past due, a specific identification method, or a combination of the two methods. When a specific identification method is used, past due balances over 90 days old and balances less than 90 days old but potentially uncollectible due to bankruptcy or other issues are reviewed individually for collectability. Account balances are charged off against the allowance when we feel it is probable the receivable will not be recovered. We do not have any off-balance-sheet credit exposure related to our customers.

(j)

Inventories

Wireless handset inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market (net realizable value). Cost is determined using the average cost method. Handset costs in excess of the revenues generated from handset sales, or handset subsidies, are expensed at the time of sale. We do not recognize the expected handset subsidies prior to the time of sale because the promotional discount decision is made at the point of sale and/or because we expect to recover the handset subsidies through service revenue.

Inventories of other merchandise for resale and parts are stated at the lower of cost or market. Cost is determined using the average cost method.

(k)

Property and Equipment

Property and equipment is stated at cost. Construction costs of facilities are capitalized. Equipment financed under capital leases is recorded at the lower of fair market value or the present value of future minimum lease payments at inception of the lease. Construction in progress represents transmission equipment and support equipment and systems not placed in service on December 31, 2010 that management intends to place in service during 2011.

Depreciation is computed using the straight-line method based upon the shorter of the estimated useful lives of the assets or the lease term, if applicable, in the following ranges:

Asset Category	Asset Lives
Telephony transmission equipment and distribution facilities	5-20 years
Fiber optic cable systems	15-25 years
Cable transmission equipment and distribution facilities	5-30 years
Support equipment and systems	3-20 years
Transportation equipment	5-13 years
Property and equipment under capital leases	12-20 years
Buildings	25 years
Customer premises equipment	2-20 years

(Continued)

GCI, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Amortization of property and equipment under capital leases is included in Depreciation and Amortization Expense on the Consolidated Statements of Operations.

Repairs and maintenance are charged to expense as incurred. Expenditures for major renewals and betterments are capitalized. Accumulated depreciation is removed and gains or losses are recognized at the time of sales or other dispositions of property and equipment.

(l)

Intangible Assets and Goodwill

Goodwill, cable certificates (certificates of convenience and public necessity) and wireless licenses are not amortized. Cable certificates represent certain perpetual operating rights to provide cable services. Wireless licenses represent the right to utilize certain radio frequency spectrum to provide wireless communications services. Goodwill represents the excess of cost over fair value of net assets acquired in connection with a business acquisition. Goodwill is not allocated to our reportable segments as our Chief Operating Decision Maker does not review a balance sheet by reportable segment to make decisions about resource allocation or evaluate reportable segment performance, however, goodwill is allocated to our reporting units for the sole purpose of the annual impairment test.

All other amortizable intangible assets are being amortized over 2 to 20 year periods using the straight-line method.

(m)

Impairment of Intangibles, Goodwill, and Long-lived Assets

Cable certificates and wireless license assets are treated as indefinite-lived intangible assets and are tested annually for impairment or more frequently if events and circumstances indicate that the asset might be impaired. The impairment test consists of a comparison of the fair value of the asset with its carrying amount. If the carrying amount of the assets exceeds its fair value, an impairment loss is recognized in an amount equal to that excess. After an impairment loss is recognized, the adjusted carrying amount of the asset becomes its new accounting basis. Impairment testing of our cable certificate and wireless license assets as of October 31, 2010 and 2009 used a direct value method.

Our goodwill is tested annually for impairment, and is tested for impairment more frequently if events and circumstances indicate that the assets might be impaired. We are required to determine goodwill impairment using a two-step process. The first step of the goodwill impairment test is used to identify potential impairment by comparing the fair value of a reporting unit with its carrying amount. If the carrying amount of a reporting unit exceeds its fair value, the second step of the goodwill impairment test compares the implied fair value of the reporting unit's goodwill with the carrying amount of that goodwill. If the carrying amount of the reporting unit's goodwill exceeds the implied fair value of that goodwill, an impairment loss is recognized in an amount equal to that excess. The implied fair value of goodwill is determined in the same manner as the amount of goodwill that would be recognized in a business combination. We use a discounted cash flow method to determine the fair value of our reporting units. This method requires us to make estimates and assumptions including projected cash flows and discount rate. These estimates and assumptions could have a significant impact on whether an impairment charge is recognized and also the magnitude of any such impairment charge.

During the third quarter of 2009, we changed the date of our annual impairment test from the last day of the fiscal year to the last day of the tenth month of the fiscal year for all of our indefinite-lived intangibles. As we grew, it became increasingly difficult to complete the various impairment analyses in a timely manner, therefore, we believed the change in accounting principle related to the annual testing date was preferable as it provided us additional time to complete the impairment test and report the results of that test in our annual filing on Form 10-K. We believe that the change to the annual testing date did not delay, accelerate or avoid an impairment charge. We determined that this change in accounting principle was preferable under the circumstances and it did not result in adjustments to our financial statements when applied

(Continued)

GCI, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

retrospectively. The annual impairment test was performed as of December 31, 2008 and was performed again as of October 31, 2009, therefore, less than 12 months elapsed between impairment tests. We completed our annual review and no impairment charge was recorded for the years ended December 31, 2009 or 2010.

Long-lived assets, such as property, plant, and equipment, and purchased intangibles subject to amortization, are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset group may not be recoverable. Recoverability of an asset group to be held and used is measured by a comparison of the carrying amount of an asset group to estimated undiscounted future cash flows expected to be generated by the asset group. If the carrying amount of an asset group exceeds its estimated undiscounted future cash flows, an impairment charge is recognized by the amount by which the carrying amount of the asset group exceeds the fair value of the asset group.

(n)

Amortization and Write-off of Loan Fees

Debt issuance costs are deferred and amortized using the effective interest method. If a refinancing or amendment of a debt instrument is a substantial modification, all or a portion of the applicable debt issuance costs are written off. If a debt instrument is repaid prior to the maturity date we will write-off a proportional amount of debt issuance costs.

(o)

Other Assets

Other Assets primarily include long-term deposits, prepayments, and non-trade accounts receivable.

(p)

Asset Retirement Obligations

We record the fair value of a liability for an asset retirement obligation in the period in which it is incurred in Other Liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheets if the fair value of the liability can be reasonably estimated. When the liability is initially recorded, we capitalize a cost by increasing the carrying amount of the related long-lived asset. In periods subsequent to initial measurement, period-to-period changes in the liability for an asset retirement obligation resulting from revisions to either the timing or the amount of the original estimate of undiscounted cash flows are recognized. Over time, the liability is accreted to its present value each period, and the capitalized cost is depreciated over the useful life of the related asset. Upon settlement of the liability, we either settle the obligation for its recorded amount or incur a gain or loss upon settlement.

The majority of our asset retirement obligations are the estimated cost to remove telephony transmission equipment and support equipment from leased property. Following is a reconciliation of the beginning and ending aggregate carrying amount of our liability for asset retirement obligations (amounts in thousands):

Balance at December 31, 2008	$	6,179
Liability incurred		5,764
Accretion expense		634
Liability settled		(63	)
Balance at December 31, 2009		12,514
Liability incurred		1,253
Accretion expense		289
Liability settled		(21	)
Balance at December 31, 2010	$	14,035

During the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009 we recorded additional capitalized costs of $1.3 million and $5.8 million, respectively, in Property and Equipment in Service, Net of Depreciation.

Certain of our network facilities are on property that requires us to have a permit and the permit contains provisions requiring us to remove our network facilities in the event that the permit is not renewed. We expect to continually renew our permits and therefore cannot estimate any liabilities associated with such agreements. A remote possibility exists that we would not be able to

(Continued)

GCI, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

successfully renew a permit, which could result in us incurring significant expense in complying with restoration or removal provisions.

(q)

Revenue Recognition

All revenues are recognized when the earnings process is complete. Revenue recognition is as follows:

Revenues generated from long-distance service usage and plan fees, Internet service excess usage, and managed services are recognized when the services are provided,

We recognize unbilled revenues when the service is provided based upon minutes of use processed, and/or established rates, net of credits and adjustments,

Cable television service package fees, local access and Internet service plan fees, and private line telecommunication revenues are billed in advance, recorded as Deferred Revenue on the balance sheet, and are recognized as the associated service is provided,

Certain of our wireless services offerings have been determined to be revenue arrangements with multiple deliverables. Revenues are recognized as each element is earned based on objective evidence regarding the relative fair value of each element and when there are no undelivered elements that are essential to the functionality of the delivered elements. Revenues generated from wireless service usage and plan fees are recognized when the services are provided. Revenues generated from the sale of wireless handsets and accessories are recognized when title to the handset and accessories passes to the customer. As the non-refundable, up-front activation fee charged to the customer does not meet the criteria as a separate unit of accounting, we allocate the additional arrangement consideration received from the activation fee to the handset (the delivered item) to the extent that the aggregate handset and activation fee proceeds do not exceed the fair value of the handset. Any activation fees not allocated to the handset would be deferred upon activation and recognized as service revenue on a straight-line basis over the expected customer relationship period,

The majority of our equipment sale transactions involve the sale of communications equipment with no other services involved. Such equipment is subject to standard manufacturer warranties and we do not manufacture any of the equipment we sell. In such instances the customer takes title to the equipment generally upon delivery. We recognize revenue for such transactions when title passes to the customer and the revenue is earned and realizable. On certain occasions we enter into agreements to sell and satisfactorily install or integrate telecommunications equipment for a fixed fee. Customers may have refund rights if the installed equipment does not meet certain performance criteria. We defer revenue recognition until we have received customer acceptance per the contract or agreement, and all other required revenue recognition elements have been achieved. Revenues from contracts with multiple element arrangements, such as those including installation and integration services, are recognized as each element is earned based on objective evidence regarding the relative fair value of each element and when there are no undelivered elements that are essential to the functionality of the delivered elements,

Technical services revenues are derived primarily from maintenance contracts on equipment and are recognized on a prorated basis over the term of the contracts,

·	We account for fiber capacity Indefeasible Rights to Use ("IRU") agreements as an operating lease or service arrangement and we defer the revenue and recognize it ratably over the life of the IRU or as service is rendered,

Access revenue is recognized when earned. We participate in access revenue pools with other telephone companies. Such pools are funded by toll revenue and/or access charges regulated by the Regulatory Commission of Alaska ("RCA") within the intrastate jurisdiction and the FCC within the interstate jurisdiction. Much of the interstate access revenue is initially recorded based on estimates. These estimates are derived from interim financial information, available separation studies and the most recent information available about achieved rates of return. These estimates are subject to adjustment in future accounting periods as additional information becomes available. To the extent that a dispute arises over revenue settlements, our policy is to defer revenue collected until the dispute is resolved,

As an Eligible Telecommunications Carrier ("ETC"), we receive support from the Universal Service Fund ("USF") to support the provision of wireline local access and wireless service in high-cost areas. We accrue estimated program revenue quarterly based on current line counts, the most current rates paid to us, our assessment of the impact of current FCC regulations, and our assessment of the potential outcome of FCC proceedings. Our estimated accrued revenue is subject to our judgment regarding the outcome of many variables and is subject to upward or downward adjustment in subsequent periods. Our ability to collect our accrued USF support is contingent upon continuation of the USF program and upon our eligibility to participate in that program, which is subject to change by future regulatory, legislative or judicial actions. We adjust revenue and the account receivable in the period the FCC makes a program change or we assess the likelihood that such a change has increased or decreased revenue. The payment from the USF is generally received approximately ten months subsequent to the services being performed. At December 31, 2010 we have $40.0 million in accounts receivable related to the USF high-cost area program. We do not recognize revenue until our ETC status has been approved by the RCA,

We receive refunds from time to time from incumbent local exchange carriers (“ILECs”), with which we do business in respect of their earnings that exceed regulatory requirements. Telephone companies that are rate regulated by the FCC using the rate of return method are required by the FCC to refund earnings from interstate access charges assessed to long-distance carriers when their earnings exceed their authorized rate of return. Such refunds are computed based on the regulated carrier’s earnings in several access categories. Uncertainties exist with respect to the amount of their earnings, the refunds (if any), their timing, and their realization. We account for such refundable amounts as gain contingencies, and, accordingly, do not recognize them until realization is a certainty upon receipt,

We receive grant revenue for the purpose of building communication infrastructure in rural areas. We defer the revenue and recognize it over the life of the asset that was constructed using grant funds, and

Other revenues are recognized when the service is provided.

(Continued)

GCI, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

We recognized $2.8 million of wireless revenue in July 2008 from USAC for interstate common line support. Due to the uncertainty in our ability to retroactively claim reimbursement under the program, we accounted for this payment as a gain contingency and, accordingly, recognized revenue only upon receipt of payment when realization was certain.

(r)

Payments Received from Suppliers

Our Consumer segment occasionally receives reimbursements for video services costs to promote suppliers’ services, called cooperative advertising arrangements. The supplier payment is classified as a reduction of selling, general and administrative expenses if it reimburses specific, incremental and identifiable costs incurred to resell the suppliers’ services. If the supplier payment is unspecific, the payment is classified as a reduction to Cost of Goods Sold. Recognition occurs upon receipt of the payment because collection is not assured.

(s)

Advertising Expense

We expense advertising costs in the year during which the first advertisement appears. Advertising expenses were $4.3 million, $4.1 million and $5.6 million for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively.

(t)

Leases

Scheduled operating lease rent increases are amortized over the expected lease term on a straight-line basis. Rent holidays are recognized on a straight-line basis over the operating lease term (including any rent holiday period).

(Continued)

GCI, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Leasehold improvements are amortized over the shorter of their economic lives or the lease term. We may amortize a leasehold improvement over a term that includes assumption of a lease renewal if the renewal is reasonably assured. Leasehold improvements acquired in a business combination are amortized over the shorter of the useful life of the assets or a term that includes required lease periods and renewals that are deemed to be reasonably assured at the date of acquisition. Leasehold improvements that are placed in service significantly after and are not contemplated at or near the beginning of the lease term are amortized over the shorter of the useful life of the assets or a term that includes required lease periods and renewals that are deemed to be reasonably assured at the date the leasehold improvements are purchased. Leasehold improvements made by us and funded by landlord incentives or allowances under an operating lease are recorded as deferred rent and amortized as reductions to lease expense over the lease term.

(u)

Interest Expense

Material interest costs incurred during the construction period of non-software capital projects are capitalized. Interest costs incurred during the development period of a software capital project are capitalized. Interest is capitalized in the period commencing with the first expenditure for a qualifying capital project and ending when the capital project is substantially complete and ready for its intended use. We capitalized interest cost of $1.1 million, $548,000 and $4.2 million during the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively.

(v)

Income Taxes

GCI, Inc., as a wholly-owned subsidiary and member of the GCI controlled group of corporations, files its income tax returns as part of the consolidated group of corporations under GCI. Accordingly, all discussions regarding income taxes reflect the consolidated group's activity. Our income tax expense and deferred income tax assets are presented herein using the separate-entity method.

Income taxes are accounted for using the asset and liability method. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for their future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax basis. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable earnings in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. A valuation allowance is recognized if it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax asset will not be realized.

We file federal income tax returns in the U.S. and in various state jurisdictions. We are no longer subject to U.S. or state tax examinations by tax authorities for years before 2007 except that certain U.S. federal income tax returns for years after 1997 are not closed by relevant statutes of limitations due to unused net operating losses reported on those income tax returns.

We recognize accrued interest on unrecognized tax benefits in interest expense and penalties in selling, general and administrative expenses. We did not have any unrecognized tax benefits as of December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008, and accordingly, we did not recognize any interest expense. Additionally, we recorded no penalties during the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008.

(w)

Share-based Payment Arrangements

We currently use the Black-Scholes-Merton option-pricing model to value stock options granted to employees. We use these values to recognize stock compensation expense for stock options. Compensation expense is recognized in the financial statements for share-based awards based on the grant date fair value of those awards. Share-based compensation expense includes an estimate for pre-vesting forfeitures and is recognized over the requisite service periods of the awards on a straight-line basis, which is generally commensurate with the vesting term. See note 9 for information on the assumptions we used to calculate the fair value of share-based compensation.

(Continued)

GCI, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

We are required to report the benefits associated with tax deductions in excess of recognized compensation cost as a financing cash flow rather than as an operating cash flow.

(x)

Stock Options and Stock Awards Issued for Non-employee Services

Stock options and warrants issued in exchange for non-employee services are accounted for based upon the fair value of the consideration or services received or the fair value of the equity instruments issued using the Black-Scholes-Merton method, whichever is more reliably measurable.

The fair value determined using these principles is charged to operating expense over the shorter of the term for which non-employee services are provided, if stated, or the stock option or warrant vesting period.

(y)

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with the accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Significant items subject to estimates and assumptions include the allowance for doubtful receivables, unbilled revenues, accrual of the USF high cost area program support, share-based compensation, inventory reserves, reserve for future customer credits, valuation allowances for deferred income tax assets, depreciable and amortizable lives of assets, the carrying value of long-lived assets including goodwill, cable certificates and wireless licenses, purchase price allocations, deferred lease expense, asset retirement obligations, the accrual of Cost of Goods Sold, and the accrual of contingencies and litigation. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

The accounting estimates related to revenues from the high cost USF program are dependent on various inputs including current line counts, the most current rates paid to us, and our assessment of the impact of new FCC regulations, and the potential outcome of FCC proceedings. Some of the inputs are subjective and based on our judgment regarding the outcome of certain variables and is subject to upward or downward adjustment in subsequent periods.

Effective in the second quarter of 2010, we changed our USF high-cost area program support accrual methodology due to a change in our estimate of the current amounts expected to be paid to us. The effect of this change in estimate was a revenue increase of $4.7 million, a net income increase of $3.1 million, and a basic and diluted net income per share increase of $0.06 for the year ended December 31, 2010.

(z)

Concentrations of Credit Risk

Financial instruments that potentially subject us to concentrations of credit risk are primarily cash and cash equivalents and accounts receivable. Excess cash is invested in high quality short-term liquid money instruments. At December 31, 2010 and 2009, substantially all of our cash and cash equivalents were invested in short-term liquid money instruments. At December 31, 2010 and 2009, cash balances were in excess of Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation insured limits.

We do not have any major customers for the year ended December 31, 2010 (see note 10). Our customers are located primarily throughout Alaska. Because of this geographic concentration, our growth and operations depend upon economic conditions in Alaska.

(aa)

Software Capitalization Policy

Internally used software, whether purchased or developed, is capitalized and amortized using the straight-line method over an estimated useful life of five years. We capitalize certain costs associated with internally developed software such as payroll costs of employees devoting time to the projects and external direct costs for materials and services. Costs associated with internally developed software to be used internally are

(Continued)

GCI, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

expensed until the point the project has reached the development stage. Subsequent additions, modifications or upgrades to internal-use software are capitalized only to the extent that they allow the software to perform a task it previously did not perform. Software maintenance and training costs are expensed in the period in which they are incurred. The capitalization of software requires judgment in determining when a project has reached the development stage.

(ab)

Guarantees

Certain of our customers have guaranteed levels of service. If an interruption in service occurs we do not recognize revenue for any portion of the monthly service fee that will be refunded to the customer or not billed to the customer due to these service level agreements.

(ac)

Classification of Taxes Collected from Customers

We report sales, use, excise, and value added taxes assessed by a governmental authority that is directly imposed on a revenue-producing transaction between us and a customer on a net basis in our statements of operations. We report a certain surcharge on a gross basis in our statement of operations of $5.2 million, $4.4 million and $4.1 million for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively.

(ad) Derivatives

From time to time we enter into derivative contracts to manage exposure to variability in cash flows from floating-rate financial instruments, particularly on our long-term debt instruments and credit facilities. We do not currently have significant exposure from floating-rate financial instruments since we repaid the outstanding indebtedness under our Senior Credit Facility in 2009 with the proceeds from the issuance of the 2019 Notes. We do not apply hedge accounting to our derivative instruments and therefore treat these instruments as “economic hedges.” Derivative instruments are accounted for at fair value as either assets or liabilities on the balance sheet. Changes in the fair value of derivatives are recognized in earnings each reporting period.

In the third quarter of 2008, we entered into two interest rate caps to manage the interest rate risk on our Senior Credit Facility, which was indexed to the London Interbank Offered Rate. These caps had a combined notional value of $180.0 million and an initial cost of $928,000. The caps had a fair value of $0 and $7,000 at December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively, resulting in realization of a loss to interest expense of $7,000 and $921,000 during the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively. The caps matured on July 1, 2010.

(ae) Reclassifications

Reclassifications have been made to the 2009 and 2008 financial statements to make them comparable with the 2010 presentation.

(2)	Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows Supplemental Disclosures

Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net effect of acquisitions, consist of (amounts in thousands):

Year ended December 31,	2010			2009			2008
(Increase) decrease in accounts receivable	$	12,283			(33,555	)		(5,209	)
(Increase) decrease in prepaid expenses		(1,459	)		1,923			488
(Increase) decrease in inventories		3,461			(2,109	)		(3,336	)
(Increase) decrease in other current assets		1,037			(4,272	)		(69	)
(Increase) decrease in other assets		2,663			(10,742	)		-
Increase (decrease) in accounts payable		1,683			(1,889	)		(4,198	)
Increase (decrease) in deferred revenues		(4,108	)		(787	)		4,543
Increase (decrease) in accrued payroll and payroll related obligations		271			(752	)		5,437
Increase (decrease) in accrued liabilities		2,585			(1,608	)		2,695
Increase (decrease) in accrued interest		(1,365	)		4,597			1,226
Increase (decrease) in subscriber deposits		(278	)		287			84
Increase (decrease) in long-term deferred revenue		(3,167	)		763			49,153
Increase (decrease) in components of other long-term liabilities		(362	)		526			(3,727	)
	$	13,244			(47,618	)		47,087

(Continued)

GCI, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

The following items are for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008 (amounts in thousands):

Net cash paid or received:	2010		2009		2008
Interest paid, net of amounts capitalized	$	71,140		51,161		46,781
Income tax refund received	$	1,163		911		83
Income tax paid	$	-		-		884

The following items are non-cash investing and financing activities for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008 (amounts in thousands):

	2010		2009		2008
Non-cash additions for purchases of property and equipment	$	7,622		4,427		12,124
Asset retirement obligation additions to property and equipment	$	1,253		5,764		1,408
Warranty receivable applied to capital lease obligation	$	-		465		8,415
Assets acquired in acquisition	$	480		6,475		-
Capital lease obligation incurred	$	-		-		99,873
Satellite warranty receivable	$	-		-		8,880

Additional Non-cash Financing Activities

We received cash proceeds of $110.6 million from the $145.0 million term loan that we obtained in May 2008. We used $30.0 million of the term loan to repay the revolving portion of our Senior Credit Facility and our loan proceeds were reduced by $2.9 million for an original issue discount and $1.5 million for bank and legal fees associated with the new term loan.

(3)	Receivables and Allowance for Doubtful Receivables

Receivables consist of the following at December 31, 2010 and 2009 (amounts in thousands):

	2010		2009
Trade	$	130,708		145,220
Employee		722		315
Other		1,426		2,324
Total Receivables	$	132,856		147,859

Changes in the allowance for doubtful receivables during the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008 are summarized below (amounts in thousands).

			Additions				Deductions
Description	Balance at beginning of year		Charged to costs and expenses		Charged to other accounts		Write-offs net of recoveries		Balance at end of year
December 31, 2010	$	7,060		3,085		1,670		2,626		9,189
December 31, 2009	$	2,582		3,818		1,734		1,074		7,060
December 31, 2008	$	1,657		3,471		-		2,546		2,582

(Continued)

GCI, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Charged to Other Accounts for the year ended December 31, 2010 consists of a $1.7 million charge for a customer that participates in the Rural Health Care Division support program that is operated by the USAC. We have been providing service to this customer pursuant to a contract since July 1, 2008. We have received funding commitment letters from USAC for both funding years that have passed since the contract start date. The commitment letter for the year from July 2008 to June 2009 committed funding for all but $1.7 million of that particular year. USAC denied funding of $1.7 million based on the timing of customer-owned equipment placed in service in relation to service charges. On August 23, 2010, we filed with the FCC a request for review of the denial. We have recorded a reserve by reducing revenue $1.7 million in the year ended December 31, 2010.

Charged to Other Accounts for the year ended December 31, 2009 consists of a $914,000 adjustment recorded upon the conversion of our Alaska DigiTel customer accounts into a Consumer customer billing system that grossed up accounts receivable and the allowance for doubtful receivables to record termination fees for tracking purposes. Additionally, the year ended December 31, 2009 includes an adjustment of $820,000 due to the decision to temporarily stop revenue recognition for services provided to a customer whose funding from the USAC was denied.

(4)	Net Property and Equipment in Service

Net property and equipment in service consists of the following at December 31, 2010 and 2009 (amounts in thousands):

	2010		2009
Land and buildings	$	36,332		31,279
Telephony transmission equipment and distribution facilities		674,246		637,292
Cable transmission equipment and distribution facilities		128,919		117,483
Support equipment and systems		190,947		170,922
Transportation equipment		9,116		9,930
Property and equipment under capital leases		102,972		102,972
Customer premise equipment		124,655		121,943
Fiber optic cable systems		244,381		242,309
		1,511,568		1,434,130
Less accumulated depreciation		693,645		598,687
Less accumulated amortization		19,645		12,363
Net property and equipment in service	$	798,278		823,080

(5)	Intangible Assets and Goodwill

As of October 31, 2010 cable certificates, wireless licenses and goodwill were tested for impairment and the fair values were greater than the carrying amounts, therefore these intangible assets were determined not to be impaired at December 31, 2010. The remaining useful lives of our cable certificates, wireless licenses and goodwill were evaluated as of October 31, 2010 and events and circumstances continue to support an indefinite useful life.

There are no indicators of impairment of our intangible assets subject to amortization as of December 31, 2010.

(Continued)

GCI, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Other Intangible Assets subject to amortization include the following at December 31, 2010 and 2009 (amounts in thousands):

	2010		2009
Software license fees	$	26,403		22,459
Customer relationships		11,034		11,217
Customer contracts		3,538		3,538
Right-of-way		783		783
Other		543		529
		42,301		38,526
Less accumulated amortization		24,584		18,965
Net other intangible assets	$	17,717		19,561

Changes in Other Intangible Assets are as follows (amounts in thousands):

Balance at December 31, 2008	$	22,976
Asset additions		4,772
Less amortization expense		7,628
Less asset write-off		559
Balance at December 31, 2009		19,561
Asset additions		4,533
Less amortization expense		6,360
Less asset write-off		17
Balance at December 31, 2010	$	17,717

Goodwill increased $480,000 at December 31, 2010 as compared to December 31, 2009 due to the contingent payment to the former shareholders of UUI. Goodwill increased $6.6 million at December 31, 2009 as compared to December 31, 2008, primarily to record a $930,000 adjustment for grant deferred revenue to the UUI and Unicom purchase price allocations and for the additional $5.2 million and $497,000 contingent payments to Alaska Wireless and the former shareholders of UUI, respectively.

Amortization expense for amortizable intangible assets for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008 follow (amounts in thousands):

	Years Ended December 31,
	2010		2009		2008
Amortization expense	$	6,360		7,628		5,948

Amortization expense for amortizable intangible assets for each of the five succeeding fiscal years is estimated to be (amounts in thousands):

Years Ending December 31,
2011	$	5,298
2012		3,810
2013		2,749
2014		1,896
2015		1,150

(Continued)

GCI, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(6)	Long-Term Debt

Long-term debt consists of the following (amounts in thousands):

	December 31,
	2010		2009
2019 Notes (a)	$	425,000		425,000
2014 Notes (b)		320,000		320,000
Senior Credit Facility (c)		20,000		-
Rural Utility Service ("RUS") debt (d)		19,844		34,721
CoBank Mortgage ("CoBank") note payable (d)		1,832		2,277
Debt		786,676		781,998
Less unamortized discount paid on the 2019 Notes		3,266		3,460
Less unamortized discount paid on the 2014 Notes		1,693		2,158
Less current portion of long-term debt		2,516		5,133
Long-term debt, net of unamortized discount	$	779,201		771,247

(a)

We pay interest of 8.63% on notes that are due in 2019 (“2019 Notes”). The 2019 Notes are senior unsecured obligations which rank equally in right of payment with the existing and future senior unsecured debt, including our 2014 Notes described below, and senior in right of payment to all future subordinated indebtedness. The 2019 Notes are carried on our Consolidated Balance Sheet net of the unamortized portion of the discount, which is being amortized to Interest Expense over the term of the 2019 Notes using the effective interest method and an effective interest rate of 9.07%.

The 2019 Notes are redeemable at our option, in whole or in part, on not less than thirty days nor more than sixty days notice, at the following redemption prices, plus accrued and unpaid interest (if any) to the date of redemption:

If redeemed during the twelve month period commencing November 15 of the year indicated:	Redemption Price
2014		104.313	%
2015		102.875	%
2015		101.438	%
2017 and thereafter		100.000	%

The 2019 Notes mature on November 15, 2019. Semi-annual interest payments are payable on May 15 and November 15 of each year.

The 2019 Notes were issued pursuant to an Indenture, dated as of the Closing Date, between us and Union Bank, N.A., as trustee.

We are not required to make mandatory sinking fund payments with respect to the 2019 Notes.

(Continued)

GCI, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Upon the occurrence of a change of control, each holder of the 2019 Notes will have the right to require us to purchase all or any part (equal to $1,000 or an integral multiple thereof, except that no 2019 Note will be purchased in part if the remaining portion thereof would not be at least $2,000) of such holder’s 2019 Notes at a purchase price equal to 101% of the principal amount of such 2019 Notes, plus accrued and unpaid interest on such 2019 Notes, if any. If we or certain of our subsidiaries engage in asset sales, we must generally either invest the net cash proceeds from such sales in our business within a period of time, prepay debt under any outstanding credit facility, or make an offer to purchase a principal amount of the 2019 Notes equal to the excess net cash proceeds, with the purchase price equal to 100% of their principal amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any.

The covenants in the Indenture restrict us and certain of our subsidiaries from incurring debt, but permits debt under the Senior Credit Facility and vendor financing as long as our leverage ratio, as defined, does not exceed 5.5 to one. If our leverage ratio does not exceed 5.5 to one, we are able to enter into sale and leaseback transactions; pay dividends or distributions on capital stock or repurchase capital stock; issue stock of subsidiaries; make certain investments; create liens on assets to secure debt; enter into transactions with affiliates; merge or consolidate with another company; and transfer and sell assets. These covenants are subject to a number of limitations and exceptions, as further described in the Indenture.

We paid closing costs totaling $9.1 million in connection with the offering, which were recorded as deferred loan costs and are being amortized over the term of the 2019 Notes. Unamortized deferred loan costs related to the Senior Credit Facility totaling $1.4 million were written off in the year ended December 31, 2009.

We were in compliance with all 2019 Notes loan covenants at December 31, 2010.

(b)

We pay interest of 7.25% on notes that are due in 2014 (“2014 Notes”). The 2014 Notes are an unsecured senior obligation. The 2014 Notes are carried on our Consolidated Balance Sheet net of the unamortized portion of the discount, which is being amortized to Interest Expense over the term of the 2014 Notes using the effective interest method and an effective interest rate of 7.50%.

The 2014 Notes are redeemable at our option, in whole or in part, on not less than thirty days nor more than sixty days notice, at the following redemption prices, plus accrued and unpaid interest (if any) to the date of redemption:

If redeemed during the twelve month period commencing February 1 of the year indicated:	Redemption Price
2011		101.208	%
2012 and thereafter		100.000	%

The 2014 Notes restrict us and certain of our subsidiaries from incurring debt, but permits debt under the Senior Credit Facility and vendor financing as long as our leverage ratio, as defined, does not exceed 6.0 to one. In addition, certain other debt is permitted regardless of our leverage ratio, including debt under the Senior Credit Facility not exceeding (and reduced by certain stated items):

$250.0 million, reduced by the amount of any prepayments, or

3.0 times earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization for the last four full fiscal quarters of us and our subsidiaries.

The 2014 Notes limit the ability of our subsidiaries to make cash dividend payments to us.

Semi-annual interest payments of $11.6 million are payable in February and August of each year.

The 2014 Notes are structurally subordinate to our Senior Credit Facility.

(Continued)

GCI, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

We are not required to make mandatory sinking fund payments with respect to the 2014 Notes.

Our 2014 Notes’ key debt covenants require our Total Leverage Ratio (as defined) be 6.0:1.0 or less and our Senior Leverage Ratio (as defined) be 3.0:1.0 or less if our Senior Debt (as defined) is greater than $250.0 million.

We were in compliance with all 2014 Notes loan covenants at December 31, 2010.

(c)

In November 2009, we completed our offering of the 2019 Notes and used the net proceeds from this offering to repay the outstanding amount of $389.8 million under our Senior Credit Facility, including $349.8 million outstanding on the term loan and $40.0 million outstanding on the revolving portion of the Senior Credit Facility. The term loan was retired upon the repayment but the revolving portion was still available to us at December 31, 2009.

On January 29, 2010, GCI Holdings, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of GCI, entered into a Second Amended and Restated Credit and Guarantee Agreement with Calyon New York Branch, as administrative agent, Royal Bank of Canada, as syndication agent, and CoBank, ACB, Union Bank of California, N.A. and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as documentation agents ("amended Senior Credit Facility"). The amended Senior Credit Facility provides a $75.0 million revolving credit facility with a $25.0 million sublimit for letters of credit. The amended Senior Credit Facility replaced our then existing Senior Credit Facility. The amended Senior Credit Facility will mature on January 29, 2015.

On October 20, 2010, we borrowed $30.0 million under our revolving credit facility to partially fund a repurchase of our Class A common stock as further described in note 9. In November 2010, we repaid $10.0 million of the $30.0 million outstanding balance. After consideration of these transactions, we have $2.7 million of letters of credit outstanding and $52.3 million available for borrowing under our revolving credit facility at December 31, 2010.

The interest rate on our amended Senior Credit Facility is the London Interbank Offered Rate plus the following Applicable Margin set forth opposite each applicable Total Leverage Ratio below:

Total Leverage Ratio (as defined)	Applicable Margin
>3.75		4.00	%
>3.25 but <3.75		3.50	%
>2.75 but <3.25		3.00	%
<2.75		2.50	%

Borrowings under the amended Senior Credit Facility are subject to certain financial covenants and restrictions on indebtedness. Our amended Senior Credit Facility Total Leverage Ratio (as defined) may not exceed 5.25:1.00; the Senior Leverage Ratio (as defined) may not exceed 3.00:1.00; and our Interest Coverage Ratio (as defined) must not be less than 2.50:1.00 at any time.

The obligations under the amended Senior Credit Facility are secured by a security interest on substantially all of the assets of GCI Holdings, Inc. and the subsidiary guarantors, and on the stock of GCI Holdings, Inc.

In connection with the amended Senior Credit Facility, we paid loan fees of $2.0 million which are being amortized over the life of the amended Senior Credit Facility.

(d)

We acquired long-term debt upon our acquisition of UUI and Unicom effective June 1, 2008, from the RUS and CoBank. The long-term debt is due in monthly installments of principal based on a fixed rate amortization schedule. The interest rates on the various loans to which this debt relates range from 2.0% to 6.8%. Through UUI and Unicom, we have $48.7 million available for borrowing for specific capital expenditures under existing borrowing arrangements. Substantially all of the assets of UUI and Unicom are collateral for the amounts due to RUS and CoBank.

(Continued)

GCI, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Maturities of long-term debt as of December 31, 2010 are as follows (amounts in thousands):

Years ending December 31,
2011	$	2,516
2012		2,462
2013		2,611
2014		322,199
2015		22,048
2016 and thereafter		434,840
		786,676
Less unamortized discount paid on 2019 Notes		3,266
Less unamortized discount paid on 2014 Notes		1,693
Less current portion of long-term debt		2,516
	$	779,201

(7)	Income Taxes

Total income tax expense of $9.5 million, $3.9 million and $1.1 million for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively, was allocated to income/loss in each year. We did not record any excess tax benefit generated from stock options exercised during the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008 since we are in a net operating loss carryforward position and the income tax deduction will not yet reduce income taxes payable. The cumulative excess tax benefits generated for stock options exercised that have not been recognized is $4.6 million at December 31, 2010.

We have income tax receivables for federal and state alternative minimum tax of $0 and $1.2 million at December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively.

Income tax expense consists of the following (amounts in thousands):

	Years Ended December 31,
	2010		2009		2008
Deferred tax expense:
Federal taxes	$	8,086		3,494		922
State taxes		1,402		442		155
	$	9,488		3,936		1,077

Total income tax expense differed from the “expected” income tax expense determined by applying the statutory federal income tax rate of 35% as follows (amounts in thousands):

	Years Ended December 31,
	2010		2009		2008
“Expected” statutory tax expense (benefit)	$	6,455		2,608		(803	)
State income taxes, net of federal expense (benefit)		1,129		456		(48	)
Income tax effect of nondeductible entertainment expenses		775		703		725

(Continued)

GCI, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Impact of non-controlling interest attributable to non-tax paying entity		-	-		526
Income tax effect of nondeductible lobbying expenses		405	380		424
Income tax effect of nondeductible officer compensation		722	761		246
Other, net		2	(972	)	7
	$	9,488	3,936		1,077

The tax effects of temporary differences that give rise to significant portions of deferred tax assets and liabilities at December 31, 2010 and 2009 are summarized below (amounts in thousands):

	2010		2009
Current deferred tax assets, net of current deferred tax liability:
Compensated absences, accrued for financial reporting purposes	$	2,115		2,565
Net operating loss carryforwards		-		8,354
Workers compensation and self insurance health reserves, principally due to accrual for financial reporting purposes		810		580
Accounts receivable, principally due to allowance for doubtful receivables		3,770		2,981
Deferred compensation expense for tax purposes in excess of amounts recognized for financial reporting purposes		92		(270	)
Other		3,358		3,408
Total current deferred tax assets	$	10,145		17,618

Long-term deferred tax assets:
Net operating loss carryforwards	$	88,967		74,345
Deferred revenue for financial reporting purposes		19,481		22,422
Alternative minimum tax credits		1,895		1,892
Deferred compensation expense for tax purposes in excess of amounts recognized for financial reporting purposes		2,908		1,093
Asset retirement obligations in excess of amounts recognized for tax purposes		1,885		1,775
Share-based compensation expense for financial reporting purposes in excess of amounts recognized for tax purposes		8,647		3,026
Other		1,168		4,132
Total long-term deferred tax assets		124,951		108,685

Long-term deferred tax liabilities:
Plant and equipment, principally due to differences in depreciation		182,490		170,260
Intangible assets		44,862		38,811
Total long-term deferred tax liabilities		227,352		209,071
Net long-term deferred tax liabilities	$	102,401		100,386

(Continued)

GCI, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

At December 31, 2010, we have tax net operating loss carryforwards of $226.4 million that will begin expiring in 2011 if not utilized, and alternative minimum tax credit carryforwards of $1.9 million available to offset regular income taxes payable in future years. Our utilization of remaining acquired net operating loss carryforwards is subject to annual limitations pursuant to Internal Revenue Code section 382 which could reduce or defer the utilization of these losses.

We are no longer subject to U.S. or state tax examinations by tax authorities for years before 2007 except that certain U.S. federal income tax returns for years after 1997 are not closed by relevant statutes of limitations due to unused net operating losses reported on those income tax returns.

Our tax net operating loss carryforwards are summarized below by year of expiration (amounts in thousands):

Years ending December 31,	Federal		State
2011	$	759		759
2018		1,313		1,294
2019		25,942		25,391
2020		44,744		43,797
2021		29,614		28,987
2022		14,081		13,788
2023		3,968		3,903
2024		722		-
2025		737		-
2026		150		-
2027		1,010		-
2028		39,879		39,715
2029		48,370		47,558
2030		15,157		15,022
Total tax net operating loss carryforwards	$	226,446		220,214

Tax benefits associated with recorded deferred tax assets are considered to be more likely than not realizable through taxable income earned in carryback years, future reversals of existing taxable temporary differences, and future taxable income exclusive of reversing temporary differences and carryforwards. The amount of deferred tax asset considered realizable, however, could be reduced if estimates of future taxable income during the carryforward period are reduced.

(8)	Financial Instruments

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The fair value of a financial instrument is the amount at which the instrument could be exchanged in a current transaction between willing parties. At December 31, 2010 and 2009, the fair values of cash and cash equivalents, net receivables, accounts payable, accrued payroll and payroll related obligations, accrued interest, accrued liabilities, and subscriber deposits approximate their carrying value due to the short-term nature of these financial instruments. The carrying amounts and estimated fair values of our financial instruments at December 31, 2010 and 2009 follow (amounts in thousands):

(Continued)

GCI, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

	December 31,				December 31,
	2010				2009
	Carrying Amount		Fair Value		Carrying Amount		Fair Value
Current and long-term debt and capital lease obligations	$	872,882		908,286		872,294		866,820
Other liabilities		73,309		72,065		72,770		71,623

The following methods and assumptions were used to estimate fair values:

Current and long-term debt and capital lease obligations: The fair values of our 2019 Notes, 2014 Notes, RUS debt, CoBank mortgage note payable, and capital leases are based upon quoted market prices for the same or similar issues or on the current rates offered to us for the same remaining maturities. The fair value of our amended Senior Credit Facility is estimated to approximate the carrying value because this instrument is subject to variable interest rates.

Other Liabilities: Lease escalation liabilities are valued at the discounted amount of future cash flows using quoted market prices on current rates offered to us. Deferred compensation liabilities are carried at fair value, which is the amount payable as of the balance sheet date. Asset retirement obligations are recorded at their fair value and, over time, the liability is accreted to its present value each period. Our non-employee share-based compensation awards are reported at their fair value at each reporting period.

Fair Value Measurements

ASC Topic 820 “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures” established a three-tiered fair value hierarchy that prioritizes inputs to valuation techniques used in fair value calculations. Level 1 inputs, the highest priority, are quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities. Level 2 inputs reflect other than quoted prices included in Level 1 that are either observable directly or through corroboration with observable market data. Level 3 inputs are unobservable inputs, due to little or no market activity for the asset or liability, such as internally-developed valuation models. We have applied the provisions of Topic 820 to our trading securities and the assets of our deferred compensation plan (primarily mutual funds).

Assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of December 31, 2010 and 2009 are as follows (amounts in thousands):

	Fair Value Measurement at Reporting Date Using
December 31, 2010 Assets	Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
Deferred compensation plan assets (mutual funds)		1,678		-		-
Total assets at fair value	$	1,678		-		-

December 31, 2009 Assets
Money market funds	$	12		-		-
U.S. government and agency obligations		883		-		-
Deferred compensation plan assets (mutual funds)		1,522		-		-
Total assets at fair value	$	2,417		-		-

(Continued)

GCI, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

The valuation of our marketable securities, money markets funds, and mutual funds are determined using quoted market prices in active markets utilizing market observable inputs.

(9)	Stockholders’ Equity

Common Stock

We were incorporated in 1997 and issued 100 shares of our no par Class A common stock to GCI in our initial capitalization. We received all ownership interests in subsidiaries previously held by GCI and proceeds from GCI’s August 1, 1997 common stock offering. We recorded $206.6 million associated with our initial capitalization. All of our issued and outstanding Class A common stock is owned by GCI.

Shared-Based Compensation

GCI’s Amended and Restated 1986 Stock Option Plan ("Stock Option Plan"), provides for the grant of options and restricted stock awards (collectively "award") for a maximum of 15.7 million shares of GCI Class A common stock, subject to adjustment upon the occurrence of stock dividends, stock splits, mergers, consolidations or certain other changes in corporate structure or capitalization. If an award expires or terminates, the shares subject to the award will be available for further grants of awards under the Stock Option Plan. The Compensation Committee of GCI’s Board of Directors administers the Stock Option Plan. Substantially all restricted stock awards granted vest over periods of up to three years. Substantially all options vest in equal installments over a period of five years and expire ten years from the date of grant. The requisite service period of our awards is generally the same as the vesting period. Options granted pursuant to the Stock Option Plan are only exercisable if at the time of exercise the option holder is our employee, non-employee director, or a consultant or advisor working on our behalf. New shares of GCI Class A common stock are issued when stock option agreements are exercised or restricted stock awards are granted.

The fair value of restricted stock awards is determined based on the number of shares granted and the quoted price of GCI’s common stock. We use a Black-Scholes-Merton option pricing model to estimate the fair value of stock options issued. The Black-Scholes-Merton option pricing model incorporates various and highly subjective assumptions, including expected term and expected volatility. We have reviewed our historical pattern of option exercises and have determined that meaningful differences in option exercise activity existed among employee job categories. Therefore, we have categorized these awards into two groups of employees for valuation purposes.

We estimated the expected term of options granted by evaluating the vesting period of stock options, employee’s past exercise and post-vesting employment departure behavior, and expected volatility of the price of the underlying shares.

We estimated the expected volatility of GCI’s common stock at the grant date using the historical volatility of GCI’s common stock over the most recent period equal to the expected stock option term and evaluated the extent to which available information indicated that future volatility may differ from historical volatility.

The risk-free interest rate assumption was determined using the Federal Reserve nominal rates for U.S. Treasury zero-coupon bonds with maturities similar to those of the expected term of the award being valued. GCI and GCI, Inc. have never paid any cash dividends on GCI’s common stock and we do not anticipate paying any cash dividends in the foreseeable future. Therefore, we assumed an expected dividend yield of zero.

The following table shows our assumptions used to compute the share-based compensation expense for stock options granted during the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008:

(Continued)

GCI, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

	2010			2009			2008
Expected term (years)		5.0 – 6.5			5.2 – 6.8			5.2 – 6.8
Volatility		52.6% – 55.8	%		53.6% – 59.1	%		47.6% – 55.4	%
Risk-free interest rate		2.0% – 2.9	%		1.7% – 3.2	%		1.6% – 3.4	%

We estimate pre-vesting option forfeitures at the time of grant and periodically revise those estimates in subsequent periods if actual forfeitures differ from those estimates. We record share-based compensation expense only for those awards expected to vest using an estimated forfeiture rate based on our historical pre-vesting forfeiture data.

A summary of option activity under the Stock Option Plan as of December 31, 2010 and changes during the year then ended is presented below (share amounts in thousands):

						Weighted
				Weighted		Average	Aggregate
				Average		Remaining	Intrinsic
				Exercise		Contractual	Value (in
	Shares			Price		Term	thousands)
Outstanding at January 1, 2010		1,627		$	7.35
Granted		203		$	5.34
Exercised		(116	)	$	5.67
Forfeited and retired		(466	)	$	7.60
Outstanding at December 31, 2010		1,249		$	7.08	4.5 years	$	6,976
Exercisable at December 31, 2010		914		$	7.33	3.1 years	$	4,885
Available for grant at December 31, 2010		4,180

The weighted average grant date fair value of options granted during the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008 was $2.84 per share, $3.49 per share and $3.10 per share, respectively. The total fair value of options vesting during the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008 was $377,000, $110,000 and $3.3 million, respectively. The total intrinsic values, determined as of the date of exercise, of options exercised in the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008 were $511,000, $120,000 and $214,000, respectively. We received $659,000, $423,000 and $416,000 in cash from stock option exercises in the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively.

A summary of nonvested restricted stock award activity under the Stock Option Plan for the year ended December 31, 2010, follows (share amounts in thousands):

				Weighted
				Average
				Grant Date
	Shares			Fair Value
Nonvested at January 1, 2010		2,225		$	5.69
Granted		336		$	7.55
Vested		(233	)	$	8.30
Forfeited		(132	)	$	12.51
Nonvested at December 31, 2010		2,196		$	5.29

(Continued)

GCI, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

The following is a summary of our share-based compensation expense for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008 (in thousands):

	2010		2009			2008
Employee share-based compensation expense	$	5,385		5,709			7,282
Expense reversal for performance based options and awards not expected to vest		-		(2,134	)		-
Adjustment to fair value of liability classified awards		1,348		(771	)		(4	)
Total share-based compensation expense	$	6,733		2,804			7,278

Share-based compensation expense is classified as selling, general and administrative expense in our consolidated Statements of Operations. Unrecognized share-based compensation expense was $4.9 million relating to 2.2 million restricted stock awards and $732,000 relating to 335,000 unvested stock options as of December 31, 2010. We expect to recognize share-based compensation expense over a weighted average period of 1.9 years for stock options and 1.5 years for restricted stock awards.

The following is a summary of activity for stock option grants that were made not pursuant to the Stock Option Plan for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008 (share amounts in thousands):

				Weighted
				Average
				Exercise
	Shares			Price
Outstanding at December 31, 2008 and 2009		150		$	6.50
Options forfeited and retired		(150	)	$	6.50
Outstanding at December 31, 2010		-
Available for grant at December 31, 2010		-

In January 2001 we entered into an aircraft operating lease agreement with a company owned by our President and Chief Executive Officer. The lease was amended effective January 1, 2002, February 25, 2005 and December 27, 2010. Upon signing the lease, the lessor was granted an option to purchase 250,000 shares of GCI Class A common stock at $6.50 per share, of which 100,000 shares were exercised during the year ended December 31, 2006 and the remaining 150,000 shares expired on March 31, 2010.

On August 6, 2009, GCI filed a Tender Offer Statement on Schedule TO (“Exchange Offer”) with the SEC. The Exchange Offer was an offer by GCI to eligible officers, employees and stakeholders, other than officers of GCI who also serve on GCI’s Board of Directors (“Participants”) to exchange, on a grant-by-grant basis, their outstanding eligible stock options that were granted under GCI’s Stock Option Plan, whether vested or unvested, for shares of restricted stock of GCI Class A common stock that we granted under the Stock Option Plan (“Restricted Stock”). Generally, eligible options included all options issued pursuant to the Stock Option Plan between January 1, 1999, and February 15, 2009, excluding any options that vest based on EBITDA performance (“Eligible Options”). GCI accepted for cancellation, Eligible Options to purchase 5,241,700 shares of GCI Class A common stock from 166 Participants, representing approximately 86% of the options eligible for exchange in the offer with a fair value of $6.2 million as of the date of the exchange. GCI issued 1,908,890 shares of Restricted Stock to Participants, with a fair value of $7.1 million as of the date of the exchange, in each case, in accordance with the terms of the Exchange Offer.

In accordance with the terms of the Restricted Stock agreement, one-half of the Restricted Stock received in exchange for eligible options will vest on December 20, 2011 with the remainder vesting on February 28,

(Continued)

GCI, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

2012. The number of shares of Restricted Stock that were offered in exchange for each eligible option was equal to the lesser of (i) a number of shares of Restricted Stock having a fair value equal to 100% of the fair value of the eligible options exchanged for shares of Restricted Stock, or (ii) a number of shares of Restricted Stock equal to 40% of the number of shares issuable pursuant to the eligible options surrendered.

The exchange of stock options for Restricted Stock was treated as a modification of the stock options. The remaining unamortized stock compensation expense related to the original options will continue to be amortized over the vesting period of the Restricted Stock. The compensation expense for the incremental difference between the fair value of the Restricted Stock and the fair value of the original options on the date of modification, reflecting the current facts and circumstances on the modification date, will be amortized over the vesting period of the Restricted Stock. The incremental share-based compensation expense related to the modification, net of estimated forfeitures, is $940,000, of which $378,000 and $122,000 was expensed in the years ending December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. We used a lattice model to value the options exchanged for Restricted Stock for purposes of determining our incremental share-based compensation expense.

Employee Stock Purchase Plan

In 1986, GCI adopted an Employee Stock Purchase Plan (“GCI 401(k) Plan”) qualified under Section 401 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986. The GCI 401(k) Plan provides for acquisition of GCI’s Class A common stock at market value as well as various mutual funds. The GCI 401(k) Plan permits each employee who has completed one year of service to elect to participate. Eligible employees could elect to reduce their compensation by up to 50 percent of such compensation (subject to certain limitations) up to a maximum of $16,500 during the year ended December 31, 2010. Contributions may be made on either a pretax or Roth basis.

Eligible employees were allowed to make catch-up contributions of no more than $5,500 during the year ended December 31, 2010 and will be able to make such contributions limited to $5,500 during the year ended December 31, 2011. We do not match employee catch-up contributions.

We may match up to 100% of employee salary reductions in any amount, decided by GCI’s Board of Directors each year, but not more than 10 percent of any one employee’s compensation will be matched in any year. Matching contributions vest over the initial six years of employment. For the year ended December 31, 2010, the combination of employee and matching contributions (pre-tax contributions and Roth basis) could not exceed the lesser of 100 percent of an employee’s compensation or $33,000 excluding catch-up contributions. For the year ended December 31, 2009, the combination of pre-tax contributions, after tax contributions and matching contributions could not exceed the lesser of 100 percent of an employee’s compensation or $49,000 excluding catch-up contributions.

Employee contributions receive up to 100% matching and employees self-direct their matching investment. Our matching contributions allocated to participant accounts totaled $6.9 million, $6.2 million, and $5.8 million for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009, and 2008, respectively. We used cash to fund all of our employer-matching contributions during the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008.

(10)	Industry Segments Data

Our reportable segments are business units that offer different products and are each managed separately.

A description of our reportable segments follows:

Consumer - We offer a full range of voice, video, data and wireless services to residential customers.

Network Access - We offer a full range of voice, data and wireless services to common carrier customers.

Commercial - We offer a full range of voice, video, data and wireless services to small businesses, local, national and global businesses, governmental entities and public and private educational institutions.

(Continued)

GCI, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Managed Broadband - We offer data services to rural school districts, hospitals and health clinics through our SchoolAccess® and ConnectMD® initiatives and managed video conferencing.

Regulated Operations - We offer voice and data services to residential, business, and governmental customers in areas of rural Alaska.

Corporate related expenses including engineering, information technology, accounting, legal and regulatory, human resources, and other general and administrative expenses for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008 are allocated to our segments using segment margin for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively. Bad debt expense for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008 is allocated to our segments using a combination of specific identification and allocations based upon segment revenue for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively. Corporate related expenses and bad debt expense are specifically identified for our Regulated Operations segment and therefore, are not included in the allocations.

We evaluate performance and allocate resources based on earnings before depreciation and amortization expense, net interest expense, income taxes, share-based compensation expense, accretion expense and non-cash contribution adjustment (“Adjusted EBITDA”). Management believes that this measure is useful to investors and other users of our financial information in evaluating operating profitability as an analytical indicator of income generated to service debt and fund capital expenditures. In addition, multiples of current or projected EBITDA are used to estimate current or prospective enterprise value. The accounting policies of the reportable segments are the same as those described in the summary of significant accounting policies in note 1. Intersegment sales are recorded at cost plus an agreed upon intercompany profit.

We earn all revenues through sales of services and products within the United States. All of our long-lived assets are located within the United States of America, except approximately 82% of our undersea fiber optic cable systems which transit international waters and all of our satellite transponders.

Summarized financial information for our reportable segments for the years ended December 31, 2010 2009 and 2008 follows (amounts in thousands):

	Consumer			Network Access			Commercial			Managed Broadband			Regulated Operations		Total Reportable Segments
2010
Revenues:
Intersegment	$	-			-			5,442			-			176		5,618
External		342,898			107,227			128,458			49,962			22,705		651,250
Total revenues		342,898			107,227			133,900			49,962			22,881		656,868
Cost of Goods Sold:
Intersegment		-			600			2,515			-			176		3,291
External		104,481			25,030			59,885			14,012			4,409		207,817
Total Cost of Goods Sold		104,481			25,630			62,400			14,012			4,585		211,108
Contribution:
Intersegment		-			(600	)		2,927			-			-		2,327
External		238,417			82,197			68,573			35,950			18,296		443,433
Total contribution		238,417			81,597			71,500			35,950			18,296		445,760
Less SG&A		127,130			33,566			38,838			17,338			11,936		228,808
Plus share-based compensation		3,361			1,598			1,117			651			6		6,733
Plus non-cash contribution expense		(81	)		(41	)		(24	)		(14	)		-		(160	)
Less accretion		149			71			43			26			-		289
Adjusted EBITDA	$	114,716			50,259			30,871			19,275			6,366		221,487

(Continued)

GCI, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

2009
Revenues:
Intersegment	$	-		419		5,729	-		192	6,340
External		294,925		122,072		110,135	44,875		23,804	595,811
Total revenues		294,925		122,491		115,864	44,875		23,996	602,151
Cost of Goods Sold:
Intersegment		419		600		2,694	-		192	3,905
External		96,894		27,253		52,245	11,135		6,149	193,676
Total Cost of Goods Sold		97,313		27,853		54,939	11,135		6,341	197,581
Contribution:
Intersegment		(419	)	(181	)	3,035	-		-	2,435
External		198,031		94,819		57,890	33,740		17,655	402,135
Total contribution		197,612		94,638		60,925	33,740		17,655	404,570
Less SG&A		112,883		38,348		35,363	14,450		11,627	212,671
Plus share-based compensation		1,145		891		549	219		-	2,804
Plus non-cash contribution expense		294		201		98	47		-	640
Adjusted EBITDA	$	86,587		57,563		23,174	19,556		6,028	192,908

2008
Revenues:
Intersegment	$	84		916		5,808	-		157	6,965
External		255,632		153,821		114,660	37,047		14,282	575,442
Total revenues		255,716		154,737		120,468	37,047		14,439	582,407
Cost of Goods Sold:
Intersegment		656		685		2,821	125		97	4,384
External		89,853		40,326		59,480	10,265		3,134	203,058
Total Cost of Goods Sold		90,509		41,011		62,301	10,390		3,231	207,442
Contribution:
Intersegment		(572	)	231		2,987	(125	)	60	2,581
External		165,779		113,495		55,180	26,782		11,148	372,384
Total contribution		165,207		113,726		58,167	26,657		11,208	374,965
Less SG&A		110,364		43,057		36,191	13,132		7,562	210,306
Plus share-based compensation		2,891		2,443		1,392	552		-	7,278
Plus non-cash contribution expense		199		177		76	28		-	480
Plus non-controlling interest		661		589		253	-		-	1,503
Plus other expense		(217	)	-		-	-		-	(217	)
Adjusted EBITDA	$	58,949		73,647		20,710	14,230		3,586	171,122

A reconciliation of reportable segment revenues to consolidated revenues follows (amounts in thousands):

(Continued)

GCI, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Years Ended December 31,	2010		2009		2008
Reportable segment revenues	$	656,868		602,151		582,407
Less intersegment revenues eliminated in consolidation		5,618		6,340		6,965
Consolidated revenues	$	651,250		595,811		575,442

A reconciliation of reportable segment Adjusted EBITDA to consolidated income (loss) before income tax expense follows (amounts in thousands):

Years Ended December 31,	2010			2009			2008
Reportable segment Adjusted EBITDA	$	221,487			192,908			171,122
Less depreciation and amortization expense		(126,114	)		(123,362	)		(114,369	)
Less share-based compensation expense		(6,733	)		(2,804	)		(7,278	)
(Less) plus non-cash contribution expense		160			(640	)		(480	)
Less net loss attributable to non-controlling interest		-			-			(1,503	)
Less accretion expense		(289	)		-			-
Plus other expense		-			-			217
Consolidated operating income		88,511			66,102			47,709
Less other expense, net		(70,068	)		(58,650	)		(50,004	)
Consolidated income (loss) before income tax expense	$	18,443			7,452			(2,295	)

Assets at December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008 and capital expenditures for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008 are not allocated to reportable segments as our Chief Operating Decision Maker does not review a balance sheet or capital expenditures by segment to make decisions about resource allocations or to evaluate segment performance.

We did not have any major customers for the year ended December 31, 2010. We earned revenues included in the Network Access segment from a major customer for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, net of discounts, of $64.5 million and $65.0 million, respectively. As a percentage of total revenues, our major customer’s revenues totaled 11% for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008.

(11)	Related Party Transactions

We entered into a long-term capital lease agreement in 1991 with the wife of our President and CEO for property occupied by us. The leased asset was capitalized in 1991 at the owner’s cost of $900,000 and the related obligation was recorded. The lease agreement was amended in April 2008 and our existing capital lease asset and liability increased $1.3 million to record the extension of this capital lease. The amended lease terminates on September 30, 2026.

In January 2001 we entered into an aircraft operating lease agreement with a company owned by our President and CEO. The lease was amended effective January 1, 2002, February 25, 2005 and December 27, 2010. The lease term is month-to-month and may be terminated at any time upon one hundred and twenty days written notice. The monthly lease rate is $75,000. Upon signing the lease, the lessor was granted an option to purchase 250,000 shares of GCI Class A common stock at $6.50 per share, of which 100,000 shares were exercised during the year ended December 31, 2006 and the remaining 150,000 shares expired on March 31, 2010. We paid a deposit of $1.5 million in connection with the lease. The deposit will be repaid to us upon the earlier of six months after the agreement terminates, or

(Continued)

100

GCI, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

nine months after the date of a termination notice. In December 2010 we paid $350,000 to the lessor for the right to return the aircraft to the lessor in the same condition it was in on December 27, 2010.

(12)	Commitments and Contingencies

Operating Leases as Lessee

We lease business offices, have entered into site lease agreements and use satellite transponder and fiber capacity and certain equipment pursuant to operating lease arrangements. Many of our leases are for multiple years and contain renewal options. Rental costs, including immaterial amounts of contingent rent expense, under such arrangements amounted to $31.0 million, $29.5 million and $35.7 million for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively.

Capital Leases as Lessee

We entered into a long-term capital lease agreement in 1991 with the wife of our President and CEO for property occupied by us as further described in note 11.

On March 31, 2006, through our subsidiary GCI Communication Corp. we entered into an agreement to lease transponder capacity on Intelsat, Ltd.’s (“Intelsat”) Galaxy 18 spacecraft that successfully launched on May 21, 2008. We are also leasing capacity on the Horizons 1 satellite, which is owned jointly by Intelsat and JSAT International, Inc. The leased capacity replaced our existing transponder capacity on Intelsat’s Galaxy XR satellite.

The Intelsat Galaxy 18 C-band and Ku-Band transponders are being leased over an expected term of 14 years. The present value of the lease payments, excluding telemetry, tracking and command services and back-up protection, was $98.6 million. We recorded a capital lease obligation and an addition to our Property and Equipment at December 31, 2008.

In June 2008 Galaxy XR was taken out of service resulting in the removal of the remaining $8.8 million net book value and the recognition of an $8.8 million warranty receivable. We applied $8.4 million of the warranty receivable to offset our cash obligation relating to the capital lease during the year ended December 31, 2008, resulting in an outstanding warranty receivable of $465,000 as of December 31, 2008. During the year ended December 31, 2009, we applied the remaining $465,000 of the warranty receivable to offset our cash obligation.

A summary of future minimum lease payments follows (amounts in thousands):

Years ending December 31:	Operating		Capital
2011	$	21,435		11,672
2012		17,614		11,732
2013		16,312		11,742
2014		14,653		11,752
2015		13,764		11,761
2016 and thereafter		67,515		78,471
Total minimum lease payments	$	151,293		137,130
Less amount representing interest				45,965
Less current maturity of obligations under capital leases				5,136
Long-term obligations under capital leases, excluding current maturity			$	86,029

The leases generally provide that we pay the taxes, insurance and maintenance expenses related to the leased assets. Several of our leases include renewal options, escalation clauses and immaterial amounts of contingent rent expense. We expect that in the normal course of business leases that expire will be renewed or replaced by leases on other properties.

(Continued)

101

GCI, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Operating Leases as Lessor and IRU Revenue

We enter into lease or service arrangements for IRU capacity on our fiber optic cable systems with third parties and for many of these leases or service arrangements, we received up-front cash payments. We have $50.1 million and $52.9 million in deferred revenue at December 31, 2010 and 2009 respectively, representing cash received from customers for which we will recognize revenue in the future. The arrangements under operating lease or service arrangements expire on various dates through 2029. The revenue will be recognized over the term of the agreements.

A summary of minimum future lease or service arrangement cash receipts including IRUs and the provision of certain other service are as follows (amounts in thousands):

Years ending December 31,
2011	$	6,741
2012		6,697
2013		6,628
2014		6,140
2015		5,005
2016 and thereafter		38,042
Total minimum future service revenues	$	69,253

The cost of assets that are leased to customers is $256.2 million and $251.5 million as of December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. The carrying value of assets leased to customers is $159.4 million and $166.2 million as of December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively.

Letters of Credit

We have letters of credit totaling $2.7 million outstanding under our amended Senior Credit Facility as follows:

·	$2.4 million to secure payment of certain access charges associated with our provision of telecommunications services within the State of Alaska,

·	$249,000 to meet obligations associated with our insurance arrangements, and

·	$100,000 to secure right of way access.

Wireless Service Equipment Obligation

We have entered into an agreement to purchase hardware, software, and equipment capable of providing wireless service to small markets in rural Alaska as a reliable substitute for standard wire line service. The agreement has a total remaining commitment of $4.8 million. We paid $2.9 million, $5.2 million and $3.8 million for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively, and expect to pay $284,000 and $4.5 million during the years ended December 31, 2011, and 2012, respectively.

Guaranteed Service Levels

Certain customers have guaranteed levels of service with varying terms. In the event we are unable to provide the minimum service levels we may incur penalties or issue credits to customers.

(Continued)

102

GCI, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Self-Insurance

Through December 31, 2010, we were self-insured for losses and liabilities related primarily to health and welfare claims up to $200,000 per incident and $2.0 million per lifetime per beneficiary above which third party insurance applied. Effective January 1, 2011, these limits are $500,000 per incident and $2.0 million per lifetime. A reserve of $1.6 million and $1.1 million was recorded at December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively, to cover estimated reported losses, estimated unreported losses based on past experience modified for current trends, and estimated expenses for settling claims. We are self-insured up to $500,000 per incident for losses and liabilities related to workers’ compensation claims and have an insurance policy for any losses in excess of $500,000 per incident. A reserve of $1.8 million and $72,000 was recorded at December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively, to cover estimated reported losses and estimated expenses for investigating and settling claims. $1.3 million was included in this reserve for the year ended December 31, 2010 for the GCI-owned aircraft accident further discussed below. Actual losses will vary from the recorded reserves. While we use what we believe are pertinent information and factors in determining the amount of reserves, future additions to the reserves may be necessary due to changes in the information and factors used.

We are self-insured for damage or loss to certain of our transmission facilities, including our buried, undersea, and above-ground transmission lines. If we become subject to substantial uninsured liabilities due to damage or loss to such facilities, our financial position, results of operations or liquidity may be adversely affected.

Litigation, Disputes, and Regulatory Matters

We are involved in various lawsuits, billing disputes, legal proceedings, and regulatory matters that have arisen from time to time in the normal course of business. While the ultimate results of these items cannot be predicted with certainty we do not expect, at this time, that the resolution of them will have a material adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations or liquidity. In addition we are involved in the following matters:

In September 2008, the FCC’s Office of Inspector General initiated an investigation regarding Alaska DigiTel’s compliance with program rules and requirements under the Lifeline Program. The request covered the period beginning January 1, 2004 through August 31, 2008 and related to amounts received for Lifeline service. Alaska DigiTel was an Alaska based wireless communications company of which we acquired an 81.9% equity interest on January 2, 2007 and the remaining 18.1% equity interest on August 18, 2008 and was subsequently merged with one of our wholly owned subsidiaries in April 2009. Prior to August 18, 2008, our control over the operations of Alaska DigiTel was limited as required by the FCC upon its approval of our initial acquisition completed in January 2007. We responded to this request on behalf of Alaska DigiTel and the GCI companies as affiliates. On January 18, 2011, we reached an agreement with the FCC and the Department of Justice to settle the matter, which required us to contribute $1.6 million to the United States Treasury and grants us a broad release of claims including those under the False Claims Act. The $1.6 million contribution, of which $154,000, $661,000 and $741,000 was recognized in selling, general and administrative expense in the Statement of Operations in the years ending December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively, was paid in January 2011; and

Universal Service

The USF pays ETCs to support the provision of local service in high cost areas. Under FCC regulations and RCA orders, we are an authorized competitive ETC for purposes of providing wireless and wireline telephone service in Anchorage, Juneau, Fairbanks, and the Matanuska Telephone Association study area (which includes the Matanuska-Susitna Valley) and other less populated areas throughout Alaska. Without ETC status, we would not qualify for USF support in these areas or other rural areas where we propose to offer wireline and wireless local services, and our revenue for providing local services in these areas would be materially adversely affected.

(Continued)

103

GCI, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

On May 1, 2008, the FCC issued an order adopting the recommendation of the Federal State Joint Board on Universal Service to impose a state-by-state interim cap on high cost funds to be distributed to competitive ETCs. As part of the revised policy, the FCC adopted a limited exception from the cap for competitive ETCs serving tribal lands or Alaska Native regions. While the operation of the cap has generally reduced the high cost fund amounts available to competitive ETCs as new competitive ETCs are designated and as existing competitive ETCs acquire new customers, providers like us who serve tribal lands or Alaska Native regions were provided some relief. On March 5, 2009, the FCC issued an additional order waiving a previously adopted limitation to the exception, the result of which was to provide uncapped support for all lines served by competitive ETCs for tribal lands or Alaska Native regions during the time the interim cap is in effect. The uncapped support for tribal lands or Alaska Native regions and the cap for all other regions will be in place until the FCC takes action on proposals for long term reform.

On March 16, 2010, the FCC staff released the National Broadband Plan, including among its topics a proposal to transition existing USF high cost support from voice to broadband networks over a 10-year period. On April 21, 2010, the FCC initiated a proceeding to consider interim and long-term USF reforms, including a five-year phase-out of support to competitive ETCs. On February 8, 2011, the FCC issued a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking to consider adopting reforms to its high cost support program, including, among other things, the proposed competitive ETC phase-out and ways to fund and distribute support for broadband services. We cannot predict at this time the outcome of this proceeding or its effect on high cost support available to us, but our revenue for providing local services in these areas would be materially adversely affected by the reduction of USF support.

Cable Service Rate Reregulation

Federal law permits regulation of basic cable programming services rates. However, Alaska law provides that cable television service is exempt from regulation by the RCA unless 25% of a system’s subscribers request such regulation by filing a petition with the RCA. At December 31, 2010, only the Juneau system is subject to RCA regulation of its basic service rates. No petition requesting regulation has been filed for any other system. The Juneau system serves 7% of our total basic service subscribers at December 31, 2010.

Alaska Wireless Contingent Payment

On July 1, 2008 we completed the acquisition of all of the ownership interests in Alaska Wireless. We made an initial payment on the acquisition date and an additional payment of $5.2 million in February 2010 that was contingent on the achievement of certain financial conditions. The commitment was accrued at December 31, 2009.

Code Division Multiple Access (“CDMA”) Network Expansion

During 2007 Alaska DigiTel and GCI signed an agreement with a customer to build-out Alaska DigiTel's CDMA network with various milestones through 2012 to provide expanded roaming area coverage. If we fail to meet the schedule, the customer has the right to terminate the agreement and we may be required to pay up to $16.0 million as liquidated damages. We expect to meet the deadlines imposed by the build-out schedule and therefore expect our expenditures to result in an expansion of our wireless facilities rather than payment of the liquidated damages.

TERRA-Southwest

In January 2010 the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s RUS approved our wholly-owned subsidiary, UUI’s application for an $88.2 million loan/grant combination to extend terrestrial broadband service for the first time to Bristol Bay and the Yukon-Kuskokwim Delta, an area in Alaska roughly the size of the state of North Dakota. Upon completion, TERRA-Southwest (“TERRA-SW”) will be able to serve over 9,000 households and over 700 businesses in the 65 covered communities. The project will also be able to serve numerous public/non-profit/private community anchor institutions and entities, such as regional health care providers, school districts, and other regional and Alaska native organizations. The RUS award, consisting of a $44.2 million loan and a $44.0 million grant, will be made under the RUS Broadband Initiatives Program established pursuant to the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act. The award will fund backbone network facilities that we would not otherwise be able to construct within our return-on-investment requirements. UUI started construction on TERRA-SW in 2010 and expects to complete the project in 2012 or earlier if possible.

(Continued)

104

GCI, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(13)	Non-controlling Interest

On January 1, 2009 we adopted ASC Topic 810-10-65-1, “Consolidation” (formerly SFAS No. 160, “Non-Controlling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements, an Amendment of Accounting Research Bulletin No. 51”). As a result of the required retrospective application of the presentation and disclosure provisions, our loss before income tax expense changed from $792 previously reported to $2,295 for the year ended December 31, 2008. Our net loss previously reported was $1,869 and is now $3,372 for the year ended December 31, 2008. There was no change in total stockholder’s equity as of December 31, 2008. There was no adjustment to the consolidated statements of cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2008.

(14)	Fourth Quarter Results of Operations (Unaudited)

The following is a summary of unaudited quarterly results of operations for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009 (amounts in thousands):

		First	Second	Third	Fourth
		Quarter	Quarter	Quarter	Quarter
2010
Total revenues	$	152,419	162,326	171,509	164,996
Operating income	$	19,129	25,048	30,203	14,131
Net income (loss) attributable to GCI, Inc.	$	1,674	1,930	7,583	(2,232)

2009
Total revenues	$	148,689	148,796	150,816	147,510
Operating income	$	13,512	18,559	20,730	13,301
Net income (loss) attributable to GCI, Inc.	$	354	2,564	4,336	(3,738)

During the fourth quarter of 2009, we recognized $1.9 million in interest expense resulting from the write-off of the original issue discount on our Senior Credit Facility, our interest expense increased $1.0 million due to the issuance of $425.0 million in additional Senior Notes, we recognized $1.0 million in interest expense resulting from the write-off of deferred loan costs on our Senior Credit Facility, we recorded an $862,000 adjustment to decrease wireless revenue to correct the accrual of wireless plan fee and usage revenue reported in prior quarters, and we recorded a $760,000 increase to the Allowance for Doubtful Receivables to reserve for a certain customer account receivable.

(15)	Subsequent Event

On January 18, 2011, we repaid $5.0 million of our outstanding long-term debt. On February 15, 2011 and February 25, 2011, we borrowed $8.0 million and $5.0 million, respectively, under our amended Senior Credit Facility. After consideration of these transactions, we have $44.3 million available for borrowing under our revolving credit facility.

105

Item 15(b). Exhibits

Listed below are the exhibits that are filed as a part of this Report (according to the number assigned to them in Item 601 of Regulation S-K):

Exhibit No.	Description
3.1	Restated Articles of Incorporation of General Communication, Inc. dated August 20, 2007 (37)
3.2	Amended and Restated Bylaws of General Communication, Inc. dated August 20, 2007 (36)
4.1	Certified copy of the General Communication, Inc. Amendment No. 1, dated as of June 25, 2007, to the Amended and Restated 1986 Stock Option Plan (33)
10.3	Westin Building Lease (3)
10.4	Duncan and Hughes Deferred Bonus Agreements (4)
10.5	Compensation Agreement between General Communication, Inc. and William C. Behnke dated January 1, 1997 (13)
10.6	Order approving Application for a Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity to operate as a Telecommunications (Intrastate Interexchange Carrier) Public Utility within Alaska (2)
10.13	MCI Carrier Agreement between MCI Telecommunications Corporation and General Communication, Inc. dated January 1, 1993 (5)
10.14	Contract for Alaska Access Services Agreement between MCI Telecommunications Corporation and General Communication, Inc. dated January 1, 1993 (5)
10.15	Promissory Note Agreement between General Communication, Inc. and Ronald A. Duncan, dated August 13, 1993 (6)
10.16	Deferred Compensation Agreement between General Communication, Inc. and Ronald A. Duncan, dated August 13, 1993 (6)
10.17	Pledge Agreement between General Communication, Inc. and Ronald A. Duncan, dated August 13, 1993 (6)
10.20	The GCI Special Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Plan (7)
10.21	Transponder Purchase Agreement for Galaxy X between Hughes Communications Galaxy, Inc. and GCI Communication Corp. (7)
10.25	Licenses: (3)
10.25.1	214 Authorization
10.25.2	International Resale Authorization
10.25.3	Digital Electronic Message Service Authorization
10.25.11	Certificate of Convenience and Public Necessity – Telecommunications Service (Local Exchange) dated July 7, 2000 (29)
10.26	ATU Interconnection Agreement between GCI Communication Corp. and Municipality of Anchorage, executed January 15, 1997 (12)
10.29	Asset Purchase Agreement, dated April 15, 1996, among General Communication, Inc., ACNFI, ACNJI and ACNKSI (8)
10.30	Asset Purchase Agreement, dated May 10, 1996, among General Communication, Inc., and Alaska Cablevision, Inc. (8)
10.31	Asset Purchase Agreement, dated May 10, 1996, among General Communication, Inc., and McCaw/Rock Homer Cable System, J.V. (8)
10.32	Asset Purchase Agreement, dated May 10, 1996, between General Communication, Inc., and McCaw/Rock Seward Cable System, J.V. (8)

106

10.33	Amendment No. 1 to Securities Purchase and Sale Agreement, dated October 31, 1996, among General Communication, Inc., and the Prime Sellers Agent (9)
10.34	First Amendment to Asset Purchase Agreement, dated October 30, 1996, among General Communication, Inc., ACNFI, ACNJI and ACNKSI (9)
10.36	Order Approving Arbitrated Interconnection Agreement as Resolved and Modified by Order U-96-89(5) dated January 14, 1997 (12)
10.37	Amendment to the MCI Carrier Agreement executed April 20, 1994 (12)
10.38	Amendment No. 1 to MCI Carrier Agreement executed July 26, 1994 (11)
10.39	MCI Carrier Addendum—MCI 800 DAL Service effective February 1, 1994 (11)
10.40	Third Amendment to MCI Carrier Agreement dated as of October 1, 1994 (11)
10.41	Fourth Amendment to MCI Carrier Agreement dated as of September 25, 1995 (11)
10.42	Fifth Amendment to the MCI Carrier Agreement executed April 19, 1996 (12)
10.43	Sixth Amendment to MCI Carrier Agreement dated as of March 1, 1996 (11)
10.44	Seventh Amendment to MCI Carrier Agreement dated November 27, 1996 (14)
10.45	First Amendment to Contract for Alaska Access Services between General Communication, Inc. and MCI Telecommunications Corporation dated April 1, 1996 (14)
10.46	Service Mark License Agreement between MCI Communications Corporation and General Communication, Inc. dated April 13, 1994 (13)
10.47	Radio Station Authorization (Personal Communications Service License), Issue Date June 23, 1995 (13)
10.50	Contract No. 92MR067A Telecommunications Services between BP Exploration (Alaska), Inc. and GCI Network Systems dated April 1, 1992 (14)
10.51	Amendment No. 03 to BP Exploration (Alaska) Inc. Contract No. 92MRO67A effective August 1, 1996 (14)
10.52	Lease Agreement dated September 30, 1991 between RDB Company and General Communication, Inc. (2)
10.54	Order Approving Transfer Upon Closing, Subject to Conditions, and Requiring Filings dated September 23, 1996 (13)
10.55	Order Granting Extension of Time and Clarifying Order dated October 21, 1996 (13)
10.58	Employment and Deferred Compensation Agreement between General Communication, Inc. and John M. Lowber dated July 1992 (13)
10.59	Deferred Compensation Agreement between GCI Communication Corp. and Dana L. Tindall dated August 15, 1994 (13)
10.60	Transponder Lease Agreement between General Communication Incorporated and Hughes Communications Satellite Services, Inc., executed August 8, 1989 (6)
10.61	Addendum to Galaxy X Transponder Purchase Agreement between GCI Communication Corp. and Hughes Communications Galaxy, Inc. dated August 24, 1995 (13)
10.62	Order Approving Application, Subject to Conditions; Requiring Filing; and Approving Proposed Tariff on an Inception Basis, dated February 4, 1997 (13)
10.66	Supply Contract Between Submarine Systems International Ltd. And GCI Communication Corp. dated as of July 11, 1997. (15)
10.67	Supply Contract Between Tyco Submarine Systems Ltd. And Alaska United Fiber System Partnership Contract Variation No. 1 dated as of December 1, 1997. (15)
10.71	Third Amendment to Contract for Alaska Access Services between General Communication, Inc. and MCI Telecommunications Corporation dated February 27, 1998 (16) #

107

10.80	Fourth Amendment to Contract for Alaska Access Services between General Communication, Inc. and its wholly owned subsidiary GCI Communication Corp., and MCI WorldCom dated January 1, 1999. (17) #
10.89	Fifth Amendment to Contract for Alaska Access Services between General Communication, Inc. and its wholly owned subsidiary GCI Communication Corp., and MCI WorldCom Network Services, Inc., formerly known as MCI Telecommunications Corporation dated August 7, 2000 # (18)
10.90	Sixth Amendment to Contract for Alaska Access Services between General Communication, Inc. and its wholly owned subsidiary GCI Communication Corp., and MCI WorldCom Network Services, Inc., formerly known as MCI Telecommunications Corporation dated February 14, 2001 # (18)
10.91	Seventh Amendment to Contract for Alaska Access Services between General Communication, Inc. and its wholly owned subsidiary GCI Communication Corp., and MCI WorldCom Network Services, Inc., formerly known as MCI Telecommunications Corporation dated March 8, 2001 # (18)
10.100	Contract for Alaska Access Services between Sprint Communications Company L.P. and General Communication, Inc. and its wholly owned subsidiary GCI Communication Corp. dated March 12, 2002 # (21)
10.102	First Amendment to Lease Agreement dated as of September 2002 between RDB Company and GCI Communication Corp. as successor in interest to General Communication, Inc. (22)
10.103	Agreement and plan of merger of GCI American Cablesystems, Inc. a Delaware corporation and GCI Cablesystems of Alaska, Inc. an Alaska corporation each with and into GCI Cable, Inc. an Alaska corporation, adopted as of December 10, 2002 (22)
10.104	Articles of merger between GCI Cablesystems of Alaska, Inc. and GCI Cable, Inc., adopted as of December 10, 2002 (22)
10.105	Aircraft lease agreement between GCI Communication Corp., and Alaska corporation and 560 Company, Inc., an Alaska corporation, dated as of January 22, 2001 (22)
10.106	First amendment to aircraft lease agreement between GCI Communication Corp., and Alaska corporation and 560 Company, Inc., an Alaska corporation, dated as of February 8, 2002 (22)
10.108	Bonus Agreement between General Communication, Inc. and Wilson Hughes (23)
10.109	Eighth Amendment to Contract for Alaska Access Services between General Communication, Inc. and its wholly owned subsidiary GCI Communication Corp., and MCI WorldCom Network Services, Inc. # (23)
10.110	Settlement and Release Agreement between General Communication, Inc. and WorldCom, Inc. (23)
10.112	Waiver letter agreement dated as of February 13, 2004 for Credit, Guaranty, Security and Pledge Agreement (24)
10.113	Indenture dated as of February 17, 2004 between GCI, Inc. and The Bank of New York, as trustee (24)
10.114	Registration Rights Agreement dated as of February 17, 2004, among GCI, Inc., and Deutsche Bank Securities Inc., Jefferies & Company, Inc., Credit Lyonnais Securities (USA), Inc., Blaylock & Partners, L.P., Ferris, Baker Watts, Incorporated, and TD Securities (USA), Inc., as Initial Purchasers (24)
10.121	First amendment to contract for Alaska Access Services between Sprint Communications Company L.P. and General Communication, Inc. and its wholly owned subsidiary GCI Communication Corp. dated July 24, 2002 # (26)

108

10.122	Second amendment to contract for Alaska Access Services between Sprint Communications Company L.P. and General Communication, Inc. and its wholly owned subsidiary GCI Communication Corp. dated December 31, 2003 (26)
10.123	Third amendment to contract for Alaska Access Services between Sprint Communications Company L.P. and General Communication, Inc. and its wholly owned subsidiary GCI Communication Corp. dated February 19, 2004 # (26)
10.124	Fourth amendment to contract for Alaska Access Services between Sprint Communications Company L.P. and General Communication, Inc. and its wholly owned subsidiary GCI Communication Corp. dated June 30, 2004 # (26)
10.126	Audit Committee Charter (as revised by the board of directors of General Communication, Inc. effective as of February 3, 2005) (27)
10.127	Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee Charter (as revised by the board of directors of General Communication, Inc. effective as of February 3, 2005) (27)
10.128	Fifth amendment to contract for Alaska Access Services between Sprint Communications Company L.P. and General Communication, Inc. and its wholly owned subsidiary GCI Communication Corp. dated January 22, 2005 # (27)
10.129	Ninth Amendment to Contract for Alaska Access Services between General Communication, Inc. and its wholly owned subsidiary GCI Communication Corp., and MCI WorldCom Network Services, Inc. # (28)
10.130	Amended and Restated Credit Agreement among GCI Holdings, Inc. and Calyon New York Branch as Administrative Agent, Sole Lead Arranger, and Co-Bookrunner, The Initial Lenders and Initial Issuing Bank Named Herein as Initial Lenders and Initial Issuing Bank, General Electric Capital Corporation as Syndication Agent, and Union Bank of California, N.A., CoBank, ACB, CIT Lending Services Corporation and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. as Co-Documentation Agents, dated as of August 31, 2005 (28)
10.131	Amended and Restated 1986 Stock Option Plan of General Communication, Inc. as of June 7, 2005 (28)
10.132	Amendment No. 1 to $150 Million EBITDA Incentive Program dated December 30, 2005 (29)
10.134	Full-time Transponder Capacity Agreement with PanAmSat Corporation dated March 31, 2006 # (30)
10.135	Tenth Amendment to Contract for Alaska Access Services between General Communication, Inc. and its wholly owned subsidiary GCI Communication Corp., and MCI Communications Services, Inc. d/b/a Verizon Business Services (successor-in-interest to MCI Network Services, Inc., which was formerly known as MCI WorldCom Network Services) # (31)
10.136	Reorganization Agreement among General Communication, Inc., Alaska DigiTel, LLC, The Members of Alaska DigiTel, LLC, AKD Holdings, LLC and The Members of Denali PCS, LLC dated as of June 16, 2006 (Nonmaterial schedules and exhibits to the Reorganization Agreement have been omitted pursuant to Item 601b.2 of Regulation S-K. We agree to furnish supplementally to the Commission upon request a copy of any omitted schedule or exhibit.) # (32)
10.137	Second Amended and Restated Operating Agreement of Alaska DigiTel, LLC dated as of January 1, 2007 (We agree to furnish supplementally to the Commission upon request a copy of any omitted schedule or exhibit.) # (32)

109

10.138	Sixth amendment to contract for Alaska Access Services between Sprint Communications Company L.P. and General Communication, Inc. and its wholly owned subsidiary GCI Communication Corp. dated September 20, 2006 (33)
10.139	Seventh amendment to contract for Alaska Access Services between Sprint Communications Company L.P. and General Communication, Inc. and its wholly owned subsidiary GCI Communication Corp. dated January 17, 2007 # (33)
10.140	General Communication, Inc. Director Compensation Plan dated June 29, 2006 (33)
10.141	Eleventh Amendment to Contract for Alaska Access Services between General Communication, Inc. and its wholly owned subsidiary GCI Communication Corp., and MCI Communications Services, Inc. d/b/a Verizon Business Services (successor-in-interest to MCI Network Services, Inc., which was formerly known as MCI WorldCom Network Services) # (35)
10.142	Third Amendment to the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement among GCI Holdings, Inc., GCI Communication Corp., GCI Cable, Inc., GCI Fiber Communication Co., Potter View Development Co., Inc., and Alaska United Fiber System Partnership, GCI, Inc., the banks, financial institutions, and other lenders party hereto and Calyon New York Branch as Administrative Agent, dated as of September 14, 2007 (36)
10.143	Joinder Agreement dated as of September 28, 2007 among BNP Paribas, U.S. Bank National Association, GCI Holdings, Inc., GCI Communication Corp., GCI Cable, Inc., GCI Fiber Communication Co., Potter View Development Co., Inc., and Alaska United Fiber System Partnership, GCI, Inc., and Calyon New York Branch as Administrative Agent (36)
10.144	Strategic Roaming Agreement dated as of October 30, 2007 between Alaska DigiTel, LLC. And WirelessCo L.P. # (37)
10.145	CDMA Build-out Agreement dated as of October 30, 2007 between Alaska DigiTel, LLC. and WirelessCo L.P. (Nonmaterial schedules and exhibits to the Reorganization Agreement have been omitted pursuant to Item 601b.2 of Regulation S-K. We agree to furnish supplementally to the Commission upon request a copy of any omitted schedule or exhibit.) # (37)
10.146	Long-term de Facto Transfer Spectrum Leasing agreement between Alaska DigiTel, LLC. and SprintCom, Inc. # (37)
10.147	Twelfth Amendment to Contract for Alaska Access Services between General Communication, Inc. and its wholly owned subsidiary GCI Communication Corp., and MCI Communications Services, Inc. d/b/a Verizon Business Services (successor-in-interest to MCI Network Services, Inc., which was formerly known as MCI WorldCom Network Services) dated November 19, 2007 (Nonmaterial schedules and exhibits to the Reorganization Agreement have been omitted pursuant to Item 601b.2 of Regulation S-K. We agree to furnish supplementally to the Commission upon request a copy of any omitted schedule or exhibit.) # (37)
10.148	Stock Purchase Agreement dated as of October 12, 2007 among GCI Communication Corp., United Companies, Inc., Sea Lion Corporation and Togiak Natives LTD. (Nonmaterial schedules and exhibits to the Reorganization Agreement have been omitted pursuant to Item 601b.2 of Regulation S-K. We agree to furnish supplementally to the Commission upon request a copy of any omitted schedule or exhibit.) (37)
10.149	Fourth Amendment to the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement dated as of May 2, 2008 by and among GCI Holdings, Inc., the other parties thereto and Calyon New York Branch, as administrative agent, and the other Lenders party thereto (38)
10.150	Second Amendment to Lease Agreement dated as of April 8, 2008 between RDB Company and GCI Communication Corp. as successor in interest to General Communication, Inc. (39)
10.151	Audit Committee Charter (as revised by the board of directors of General Communication, Inc. effective as of April 27, 2007) (39)

110

10.152	Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee Charter (as revised by the board of directors of General Communication, Inc. effective as of April 27, 2007) (39)
10.153	Thirteenth Amendment to Contract for Alaska Access Services between General Communication, Inc. and its wholly owned subsidiary GCI Communication Corp., and MCI Communications Services, Inc. d/b/a Verizon Business Services (successor-in-interest to MCI Network Services, Inc., which was formally known as MCI WorldCom Network Services) dated January 16, 2008 # (39)
10.154	Fourteenth Amendment to Contract for Alaska Access Services between General Communication, Inc. and its wholly owned subsidiary GCI Communication Corp., and MCI Communications Services, Inc. d/b/a Verizon Business Services (successor-in-interest to MCI Network Services, Inc., which was formally known as MCI WorldCom Network Services) dated May 15, 2008 (40)
10.155	Contract for Alaska Access Services between the Company and Verizon, dated January 1, 1993 (41) #
10.156	Third Amendment to Contract for Alaska Access Services between the Company and Verizon, dated February 27, 1998 (41) #
10.157	Fourth Amendment to Contract for Alaska Access Services between the Company and Verizon, dated January 1, 1999 (41) #
10.158	Fifth Amendment to the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement dated as of October 17, 2008 by and among Holdings, Inc. the other parties thereto and Calyon New York Branch, as administrative agent, and the other Lenders party thereto (42)
10.159	Amendment to Deferred Bonus Agreement dated December 31, 2008 by and among the Company, the Employer and Mr. Duncan (43)
10.160	Amendment to Deferred Compensation Agreement dated December 31, 2008 by and among the Company, the Employer and Mr. Duncan (43)
10.161	First Amendment to the Full-Time Transponder Capacity Agreement (Pre-Launch) between Intelsat Corporation, formerly known as PanAmSat Corporation and GCI Communication Corp. dated February 15, 2008 # (44)
10.162	Second Amendment to the Full-Time Transponder Capacity Agreement (Pre-Launch) between Intelsat Corporation, formerly known as PanAmSat Corporation and GCI Communication Corp. dated April 9, 2008 # (44)
10.163	Third Amendment to the Full-Time Transponder Capacity Agreement (Pre-Launch) between Intelsat Corporation, formerly known as PanAmSat Corporation and GCI Communication Corp. dated June 4, 2008 # (44)
10.164	Fourth Amendment to the Full-Time Transponder Capacity Agreement (Pre-Launch) between Intelsat Corporation, formerly known as PanAmSat Corporation and GCI Communication Corp. dated June 4, 2008 # (44)
10.165	Fifth Amendment to the Full-Time Transponder Capacity Agreement (Pre-Launch) between Intelsat Corporation, formerly known as PanAmSat Corporation and GCI Communication Corp. dated September 30, 2008 # (44)
10.166	Sixth Amendment to the Full-Time Transponder Capacity Agreement (Pre-Launch) between Intelsat Corporation, formerly known as PanAmSat Corporation and GCI Communication Corp. dated October 31, 2008 # (44)
10.167	Seventh Amendment to the Full-Time Transponder Capacity Agreement (Pre-Launch) between Intelsat Corporation, formerly known as PanAmSat Corporation and GCI Communication Corp. dated November 6, 2008 # (44)
10.168	Eighth Amendment to the Full-Time Transponder Capacity Agreement (Pre-Launch) between Intelsat Corporation, formerly known as PanAmSat Corporation and GCI Communication Corp. dated June 8, 2009 # (44)

111

10.169	Fifteenth Amendment to Contract for Alaska Access Services between General Communication, Inc. and its wholly owned subsidiary GCI Communication Corp., and MCI Communications Services, Inc. d/b/a Verizon Business Services (successor-in-interest to MCI Network Services, Inc., which was formally known as MCI WorldCom Network Services) dated May 5, 2009 # (44)
10.170	Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement dated as of January 29, 2010 by and among GCI Holdings, Inc., the other parties thereto and Calyon New York Branch, as administrative agent, and the other Lenders party thereto (45)
10.171	Sixteenth Amendment to Contract for Alaska Access Services between General Communication, Inc. and its wholly owned subsidiary GCI Communication Corp., and MCI Communications Services, Inc. d/b/a Verizon Business Services (successor-in-interest to MCI Network Services, Inc., which was formally known as MCI WorldCom Network Services) dated October 13, 2009 (46)
10.172	Seventeenth Amendment to Contract for Alaska Access Services between General Communication, Inc. and its wholly owned subsidiary GCI Communication Corp., and MCI Communications Services, Inc. d/b/a Verizon Business Services (successor-in-interest to MCI Network Services, Inc., which was formally known as MCI WorldCom Network Services) dated December 8, 2009 # (46)
10.173	Audit Committee Charter (as revised by the Board of Directors of General Communication, Inc. effective January 1, 2010) (47)
10.174	Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee Charter (as revised by the Board of Directors of General Communication, Inc. effective as of January 1, 2010) (47)
10.175	Ninth Amendment to the Full-Time Transponder Capacity Agreement (Pre-Launch) between Intelsat Corporation, formerly known as PanAmSat Corporation and GCI Communication, Corp. dated June 29, 2010 # (47)
10.176	Stock Purchase Agreement between General Communication, Inc. and Arctic Slope Regional Corporation, an Alaska corporation, dated as of October 21, 2010 (48)
10.177	Description of Incentive Compensation Guidelines for Named Executive Officers (49)
10.178	Amended and restated aircraft lease agreement between GCI Communication Corp., and Alaska corporation and 560 Company, Inc., an Alaska corporation, dated as of February 25, 2005 *
10.179	First amendment to the amended and restated aircraft lease agreement between GCI Communication Corp., and Alaska corporation and 560 Company, Inc., an Alaska corporation, dated as of December 27, 2010 *
10.180	Tenth Amendment to the Full-Time Transponder Capacity Agreement (Pre-Launch) between Intelsat Corporation, formerly known as PanAmSat Corporation and GCI Communication, Corp. dated September 24, 2010 # *
10.181	Eleventh Amendment to the Full-Time Transponder Capacity Agreement (Pre-Launch) between Intelsat Corporation, formerly known as PanAmSat Corporation and GCI Communication, Corp. dated September 23, 2010 # *
10.182	Twelfth Amendment to the Full-Time Transponder Capacity Agreement (Pre-Launch) between Intelsat Corporation, formerly known as PanAmSat Corporation and GCI Communication, Corp. dated November 5, 2010 # *

112

10.183	Reorganization Agreement among General Communication, Inc., Alaska DigiTel, LLC, The Members of Alaska DigiTel, LLC, AKD Holdings, LLC and The Members of Denali PCS, LLC dated as of June 16, 2006 (Nonmaterial schedules and exhibits to the Reorganization Agreement have been omitted pursuant to Item 601b.2 of Regulation S-K. We agree to furnish supplementally to the Commission upon request a copy of any omitted schedule or exhibit.) *
10.184	Second Amended and Restated Operating Agreement of Alaska DigiTel, LLC dated as of January 1, 2007 (We agree to furnish supplementally to the Commission upon request a copy of any omitted schedule or exhibit.) *
10.185	Amendment No. 2 to the Amended and Restated 1986 Stock Option Plan of General Communication, Inc. (50)
10.186	Amendment No. 3 to the Amended and Restated 1986 Stock Option Plan of General Communication, Inc. *
10.187	Amended Memorandum of Understanding dated effective as of January 26, 2006 setting forth the principal terms and conditions of transactions proposed to be consummated among Alaska DigiTel, LLC, an Alaska limited liability company, all of the members of Denali PCS, LLC, an Alaska limited liability company, and General Communication, Inc., an Alaska corporation *
10.188	Broadband Initiatives Program Loan/Grant and Security Agreement between United Utilities, Inc. and the United States of America dated as of June 1, 2010 # *
14	Code Of Business Conduct and Ethics (originally reported as exhibit 10.118) (25)
18.1	Letter regarding change in accounting principle (39)
21.1	Subsidiaries of the Registrant *
31	Certifications Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 *
32	Certifications Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 *
99	Additional Exhibits:
99.1	The Articles of Incorporation of GCI Communication Corp. (1)
99.2	The Bylaws of GCI Communication Corp. (1)
99.7	The Bylaws of GCI Cable, Inc. (10)
99.8	The Articles of Incorporation of GCI Cable, Inc. (10)
99.15	The Bylaws of GCI Holdings, Inc. (13)
99.16	The Articles of Incorporation of GCI Holdings, Inc. (13)
99.17	The Articles of Incorporation of GCI, Inc. (12)
99.18	The Bylaws of GCI, Inc. (12)
99.27	The Partnership Agreement of Alaska United Fiber System (15)
99.28	The Bylaws of Potter View Development Co., Inc. (19)
99.29	The Articles of Incorporation of Potter View Development Co., Inc. (19)
99.34	The Bylaws of GCI Fiber Communication, Co., Inc. (20)
99.35	The Articles of Incorporation of GCI Fiber Communication, Co., Inc. (20)


#	CONFIDENTIAL PORTION has been omitted pursuant to a request for confidential treatment by us to, and the material has been separately filed with, the SEC. Each omitted Confidential Portion is marked by three asterisks.
*	Filed herewith.

113

Exhibit Reference		Description
1	Incorporated by reference to GCI’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1990
2	Incorporated by reference to GCI’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1991
3	Incorporated by reference to GCI’s Registration Statement on Form 10 (File No. 0-15279), mailed to the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 30, 1986
4	Incorporated by reference to GCI’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1989.
5	Incorporated by reference to GCI’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated June 4, 1993.
6	Incorporated by reference to GCI’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1993.
7	Incorporated by reference to GCI’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1995.
8	Incorporated by reference to GCI’s Form S-4 Registration Statement dated October 4, 1996.
9	Incorporated by reference to GCI’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated November 13, 1996.
10	Incorporated by reference to GCI’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1996.
11	Incorporated by reference to GCI’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated March 14, 1996, filed March 28, 1996.
12	Incorporated by reference to GCI’s Form S-3 Registration Statement (File No. 333-28001) dated May 29, 1997.
13	Incorporated by reference to GCI’s Amendment No. 1 to Form S-3/A Registration Statement (File No. 333-28001) dated July 8, 1997.
14	Incorporated by reference to GCI’s Amendment No. 2 to Form S-3/A Registration Statement (File No. 333-28001) dated July 21, 1997.
15	Incorporated by reference to The Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1997.
16	Incorporated by reference to The Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1998.
17	Incorporated by reference to The Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 1999.
18	Incorporated by reference to The Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2001.
19	Incorporated by reference to The Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2001.
20	Incorporated by reference to The Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001.
21	Incorporated by reference to The Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2002.

114

22	Incorporated by reference to The Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002.
23	Incorporated by reference to The Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2003.
24	Incorporated by reference to The Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003.
25	Incorporated by reference to The Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2004.
26	Incorporated by reference to The Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2004.
27	Incorporated by reference to The Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2005.
28	Incorporated by reference to The Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2005.
29	Incorporated by reference to The Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005 filed March 16, 2006.
30	Incorporated by reference to The Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2006.
31	Incorporated by reference to The Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2006.
32	Incorporated by reference to The Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006 filed March 19, 2007.
33	Incorporated by reference to The Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2007.
34	Incorporated by reference to The Company’s Form S-8 filed with the SEC on July 27, 2007.
35	Incorporated by reference to The Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2007.
36	Incorporated by reference to The Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2007.
37	Incorporated by reference to The Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007 filed March 7, 2008.
38	Incorporated by reference to the Company's Report on Form 8-K for the period May 2, 2008 filed May 8, 2008.
39	Incorporated by reference to The Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2008.
40	Incorporated by reference to The Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2008.
41	Incorporated by reference to The Company's Report on Form 8-K for the period September 19, 2008 filed on September 22, 2008.
42	Incorporated by reference to The Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2008.

115

43	Incorporated by reference to The Company's Report on Form 8-K for the period December 31, 2008 filed January 6, 2009.
44	Incorporated by reference to The Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2009.
45	Incorporated by reference to The Company's Report on Form 8-K for the period January 29, 2010 filed February 3, 2010.
46	Incorporated by reference to The Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 filed March 12, 2010.
47	Incorporated by reference to The Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2010 filed August 5, 2010.
48	Incorporated by reference to The Company's Report on Form 8-K for the period October 21, 2010 filed October 27, 2010.
49	Incorporated by reference to The Company's Report on Form 8-K for the period October 7, 2010 filed October 15, 2010.
50	Incorporated by reference to The Company’s Form SC TO-I dated August 6, 2009

116

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

GCI, INC.

	By:	/s/ G. Wilson Hughes
		G. Wilson Hughes, President
		(Chief Executive Officer)

Date:

March 14, 2011

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the date indicated.

Signature	Title	Date

/s/ G. Wilson Hughes	President and Director	March 14, 2011
G. Wilson Hughes	(Principal Executive Officer)

/s/ John M. Lowber	Secretary, Treasurer and Director	March 14, 2011
John M. Lowber	(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)

117

Attached files

GCI, LLC Reports

Also read