Attached files
Table of Contents
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
(Mark One)
| x | ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010
| ¨ | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission File Number: 0-50876
NAUGATUCK VALLEY FINANCIAL CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
| United States | 65-1233977 | |
| (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) |
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
| 333 Church Street, Naugatuck, Connecticut | 06770 | |
| (Address of principal executive offices) | (Zip Code) |
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (203) 720-5000
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
| Title of each class |
Name of each exchange on which registered | |
| Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share | Nasdaq Global Market |
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
None
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes ¨ No x
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes ¨ No x
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes ¨ No ¨
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of the registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. x
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “accelerated filer,” “large accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
| Large accelerated filer | ¨ | Accelerated filer | ¨ | |||
| Non-accelerated filer | ¨ (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) | Smaller reporting company | x | |||
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes ¨ No x
The aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates as of June 30, 2010, was $16,367,411.
The number of shares outstanding of the registrant’s common stock as of March 11, 2011 was 7,018,823, of which, 4,182,407 shares were held by Naugatuck Valley Mutual Holding Company.
Table of Contents
Table of Contents
This report contains certain “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the federal securities laws. These statements are not historical facts, rather statements based on Naugatuck Valley Financial Corporation’s current expectations regarding its business strategies, intended results and future performance. Forward-looking statements are preceded by terms such as “expects,” “believes,” “anticipates,” “intends” and similar expressions.
Management’s ability to predict results or the effect of future plans or strategies is inherently uncertain. Factors which could affect actual results include interest rate trends, the general economic climate in the market area in which Naugatuck Valley Financial operates, as well as nationwide, Naugatuck Valley Financial’s ability to control costs and expenses, competitive products and pricing, loan delinquency rates and changes in federal and state legislation and regulation. Additional factors that may affect our results are discussed in this Annual Report on Form 10-K under “Item 1A. Risk Factors.” These factors should be considered in evaluating the forward-looking statements and undue reliance should not be placed on such statements. Except as may be required by applicable law or regulation, Naugatuck Valley Financial assumes no obligation to update any forward-looking statements.
PART I
| ITEM 1. | BUSINESS. |
General
Naugatuck Valley Financial Corporation was organized as a federal corporation at the direction of Naugatuck Valley Savings and Loan in connection with the mutual holding company reorganization of Naugatuck Valley Savings. The reorganization and initial public offering of Naugatuck Valley Financial was completed on September 30, 2004. In the offering, Naugatuck Valley Financial issued a majority of its outstanding shares of common stock to Naugatuck Valley Mutual Holding Company, the mutual holding company parent of Naugatuck Valley Savings. As long as Naugatuck Valley Mutual exists, it will own at least a majority of Naugatuck Valley Financial’s common stock.
Naugatuck Valley Financial’s business activity is the ownership of the outstanding capital stock of Naugatuck Valley Savings and management of the investment of offering proceeds retained from the offering. Naugatuck Valley Financial neither owns nor leases any property but instead uses the premises, equipment and other property of Naugatuck Valley Savings with the payment of appropriate rental fees, as required by applicable law and regulations. In the future, Naugatuck Valley Financial may acquire or organize other operating subsidiaries, however, there are no current plans, arrangements, agreements or understandings, written or oral, to do so. Naugatuck Valley Financial has no significant assets, other than all of the outstanding shares of Naugatuck Valley Savings and U.S. government and agency securities, and no significant liabilities. Accordingly, the information set forth in this report, including the consolidated financial statements and related financial data, relates primarily to Naugatuck Valley Savings.
Naugatuck Valley Savings is a federally chartered savings bank, and has served its customers in Connecticut since 1922. We operate as a community-oriented financial institution offering traditional financial services to consumers and businesses in our market area. We attract deposits from the general public and use those funds to originate one- to four-family, multi-family and commercial real estate, construction, commercial business, and consumer loans, which we primarily hold for investment.
Naugatuck Valley Mutual is our federally chartered mutual holding company parent. As a mutual holding company, Naugatuck Valley Mutual is a non-stock company that has as its members the depositors of Naugatuck Valley Savings. Naugatuck Valley Mutual does not engage in any business activity other than owning a majority of the common stock of Naugatuck Valley Financial.
Available Information
Naugatuck Valley Financial’s Annual Report on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, and any amendments to such reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, are made available free of charge on our website, www.nvsl.com, as soon as reasonably practicable after such reports are electronically filed with, or furnished to, the Securities and Exchange Commission. Information on our website shall not be considered a part of this Form 10-K.
Market Area
We are headquartered in Naugatuck, Connecticut, which is located in southwestern Connecticut approximately six miles south of Waterbury and 26 miles north of Bridgeport. Connecticut is one of the most attractive banking markets in the United States with a total population of approximately 3.5 million, the highest per capita income of $36,065 in the United States and a median household income of $70,340 as of June 30, 2010, ranking second in the United States and well above the U.S. median household income of $54,442, according to SNL Financial. In addition to our main office, we operate nine branch offices in the greater
1
Table of Contents
Naugatuck Valley market which we consider our market area. The greater Naugatuck Valley market encompasses the communities in the central and lower Naugatuck Valley regions in New Haven County, where our main office and eight of our branch offices are located, and Fairfield County, where one of our branch offices is located. The economy in our market area is primarily oriented to the service, retail, construction, and manufacturing industries. The median household and per capita income in New Haven County trailed slightly the comparable figures for Connecticut as a whole, while the median household and per capita income in Fairfield County exceeded the comparable figures for Connecticut.
Competition
We face significant competition for the attraction of deposits and origination of loans. Our most direct competition for deposits has historically come from the several financial institutions operating in our market area and, to a lesser extent, from other financial service companies, such as brokerage firms, credit unions and insurance companies. We also face competition for investors’ funds from money market funds and other corporate and government securities. In addition, banks owned by Bank of America Corporation, Wells Fargo & Company, J.P. Morgan Chase & Co. and TD Bank Financial Group, all of which are large super-regional bank holding companies, also operate in our market area. These institutions are significantly larger than us and, therefore, have significantly greater resources.
Our competition for loans comes from financial institutions in our market area and from other financial service providers, such as mortgage companies and mortgage brokers. Competition for loans also comes from the non-depository financial service companies in the mortgage market, such as insurance companies, securities companies and specialty finance companies.
We expect competition to continue in the future as a result of legislative, regulatory and technological changes and the continuing trend of consolidation in the financial services industry. Technological advances, for example, have lowered the barriers to enter new market areas, allowed banks to expand their geographic reach by providing services over the internet and made it possible for non-depository institutions to offer products and services that traditionally have been provided by banks. Changes in federal law permit affiliation among banks, securities firms and insurance companies, which promotes a competitive environment in the financial services industry. Banks that have received Federal Government assistance under the Economic Stabilization Act of 2008 may be able to pay higher rates on deposits and charge lower rates on loans due to their improved capital position. Competition for deposits and the origination of loans could limit our growth in the future.
Lending Activities
General. Our loan portfolio consists of one- to four-family residential mortgage loans, multi-family and commercial real estate loans, construction loans, commercial business loans and consumer loans. Substantially all of our loans are made to borrowers residing within Connecticut.
As a result of the significant growth in our construction loan, commercial real estate and multi-family loan and commercial business loan portfolios in recent years, we instituted, in October 2009, a policy establishing concentration limits for each of these portfolios as a percentage of our total risked-based capital. The following table sets forth these policy limits and our compliance with them at December 31, 2010.
| Loan Portfolio |
Policy Limit | Percentage
at December 31, 2010 |
||||||
| Construction |
120 | % | 60.8 | % | ||||
| Commercial real estate (1) |
400 | % | 315.2 | |||||
| Commercial business |
110 | % | 68.3 | |||||
| (1) | Includes multi-family loans and land and land development loans. |
One- to Four-Family Residential Loans. We originate mortgage loans to enable borrowers to purchase or refinance existing homes in our market area. We generally offer fixed-rate and adjustable-rate mortgage loans with terms up to 30 years. Borrower demand for adjustable-rate loans versus fixed-rate loans is a function of the level of interest rates, the expectations of changes in the level of interest rates, the difference between the interest rates and loan fees offered for fixed- rate mortgage loans and the initial period interest rates and loan fees for adjustable-rate loans. The relative amount of fixed-rate mortgage loans and adjustable-rate mortgage loans that can be originated at any time is largely determined by the demand for each in a competitive environment and the effect each has on our interest rate risk. The loan fees charged, interest rates and other provisions of mortgage loans are determined by us on the basis of our own pricing criteria and competitive market conditions.
We offer fixed-rate mortgage loans with terms of either 10, 15, 20 or 30 years. Our adjustable-rate mortgage loans are based on either a 15, 20 or 30 year amortization schedule and interest rates and payments on our adjustable-rate mortgage loans adjust
2
Table of Contents
annually after either a one, three, five or seven year initial fixed period. Interest rates and payments on our adjustable-rate loans generally are adjusted to a rate typically equal to 2.75% above the one-year constant maturity Treasury index. The maximum amount by which the interest rate may be increased or decreased is generally 2% per adjustment period and the lifetime interest rate cap is generally 6% over the initial interest rate of the loan.
While one- to four-family residential real estate loans are normally originated with up to 30-year terms, such loans typically remain outstanding for substantially shorter periods because borrowers often prepay their loans in full upon sale of the property pledged as security or upon refinancing the original loan. Therefore, average loan maturity is a function of, among other factors, the level of purchase and sale activity in the real estate market, prevailing interest rates and the interest rates payable on outstanding loans. As interest rates declined and remained low over the past few years, we have experienced high levels of loan repayments and refinancings.
We generally do not make conventional loans with loan-to-value ratios exceeding 97% and generally make loans with a loan-to-value ratio in excess of 80% only when secured by first liens on owner-occupied one- to four-family residences. Loans with loan-to-value ratios in excess of 80% require private mortgage insurance or additional collateral. We require all properties securing mortgage loans to be appraised by a Board-approved independent appraiser. We require title insurance on all first mortgage loans. Borrowers must obtain hazard insurance, or flood insurance for loans on property located in a flood zone, before closing the loan.
We do not engage in subprime lending or offer Alt-A loans.
Multi-Family and Commercial Real Estate Loans. We offer adjustable-rate mortgage loans secured by multi-family and commercial real estate. Our multi-family and commercial real estate loans are generally secured by condominiums, apartment buildings, offices, retail and other income producing properties, as well as owner-occupied properties used for businesses.
We originate multi-family and commercial real estate loans for terms generally up to 20 years. Interest rates and payments on adjustable-rate loans adjust every one, three, five or ten years. Interest rates on our adjustable rate loans generally are adjusted to a rate typically equal to 2.00% to 2.50% above the one-year, three-year, five-year or ten-year Federal Home Loan Bank classic advance rate. There are no adjustment period or lifetime interest rate caps. Loan amounts generally do not exceed 80% of the appraised value (since May 2010, 75% for owner-occupied properties and 70% for non-owner occupied properties).
The largest outstanding multi-family or commercial real estate loan at December 31, 2010 was $4.8 million, of which $4.8 million was outstanding. This loan is secured by commercial real estate for future retail development and was performing according to its terms at December 31, 2010.
Our largest commercial real estate loan relationship at December 31, 2010 involved three loans totaling $7.1 million, consisting of one residential mortgage and two commercial real estate loans. These loans were performing according to their original terms at December 31, 2010.
Construction Loans. We originate loans to individuals to finance the construction of residential dwellings for personal use. Our construction loans generally provide for the payment of interest only during the construction phase, which is usually nine months. At the end of the construction phase, the loan converts to a permanent mortgage loan. Loans generally can be made with a maximum loan to value ratio of 80% of the appraised value with a maximum term of 30 years. Our largest residential construction loan at December 31, 2010 was $1.4 million, of which $988,000 was outstanding. This loan was performing according to its terms at December 31, 2010. We also make commercial construction loans for commercial development projects, including condominiums, apartment buildings, and single family subdivisions as well as office buildings, retail and other income producing properties. These loans provide for payment of interest only during the construction phase and may, in the case of an apartment or commercial building, convert to a permanent mortgage loan or, in the case of a single family subdivision or construction or builder loan, be paid in full with the sale of the property after construction is complete. In the case of a commercial construction loan, the construction period may be from nine months to two years. Loans are generally made to a maximum of 80% of the appraised value as determined by an appraisal of the property made by an independent licensed appraiser. We also require an inspection of the property before disbursement of funds during the term of the construction loan for both residential and commercial construction loans. Our largest commercial construction loan and relationship at December 31, 2010 was $5.4 million, of which $3.1 million was outstanding. This loan is secured by real estate for the construction of single family homes, and was performing according to its terms at December 31, 2010.
We originate land loans to individuals on approved residential building lots for personal use for terms of up to 20 years and to a maximum loan-to-value ratio of 75% of the lower of the appraisal value or purchase price. Our land loans adjust annually after a five-year initial fixed period. Interest rates after adjustment are equal to 2.75% above the one-year constant maturity Treasury index.
3
Table of Contents
We also originate loans to local contractors and developers for the purpose of making improvements to, and on, approved subdivisions and condominium projects within two years of the date of the original loan. Such loans generally are written with a maximum loan-to-value ratio of 80% of the lower of the appraised value or purchase price of the land. These loans adjust when and as the index changes at a rate that is generally equal to the prime rate as published in The Wall Street Journal plus 1%. We require title insurance and, if applicable, a hazardous waste survey reporting that the land is free of hazardous or toxic waste.
Commercial Business Loans. We make commercial business loans to a variety of professionals, sole proprietorships and small businesses primarily in our market area. We offer a variety of commercial lending products. These loans are typically secured, primarily by business assets. These loans are originated with maximum loan-to-value ratios of 75% of the value of the business assets. We originate one- to ten-year term loans for the acquisition of equipment or business expansion, lines of credit for seasonal financing needs and demand loans for short term financing needs with specific repayment sources. Commercial business loans are generally written at variable rates which use the prime rate as published in The Wall Street Journal as an index and, depending on the qualifications of the borrower, a zero to 3.0% margin is added. These rates will change when and as the index rate changes without caps. Fixed-rate loans are written at market rates determined at the time the loan is granted and are based on the length of the term and the qualifications of the borrower. Our largest commercial business loan relationship at December 31, 2010 was a loan in the amount of $1.5 million of which $1.4 million was outstanding and performing according to the original terms at December 31, 2010. This is a participation loan secured by business assets, franchise royalties and registered patents.
When making commercial business loans, we consider the financial statements of the borrower, the borrower’s payment history of both corporate and personal debt, the debt service capabilities of the borrower, the projected cash flows of the business, and viability of the industry in which the customer operates and the value of the collateral.
Consumer Loans. We offer a variety of consumer loans, primarily second mortgage loans and home equity lines of credit, and, to a much lesser extent, loans secured by passbook or certificate accounts, automobiles, as well as unsecured personal loans and overdraft protection accounts. Unsecured loans generally have a maximum borrowing limit of $5,000 and a maximum term of three years.
The procedures for underwriting consumer loans include an assessment of the applicant’s payment history on other debts and ability to meet existing obligations and payments on the proposed loans. Although the applicant’s creditworthiness is a primary consideration, the underwriting process also includes a comparison of the value of the collateral, if any, to the proposed loan amount. Second mortgage loans have fixed rates of interest for terms of up to 20 years. These loans are originated with maximum combined loan-to-value ratios of 75% of the appraised value of the property. Home equity lines of credit have adjustable rates of interest that are indexed to the prime rate as published in The Wall Street Journal for terms of up to 10 years. These loans are originated with maximum loan-to-value ratios of 75% of the appraised value of the property and we require that we have a second lien position on the property.
Loan Underwriting Risks.
Adjustable-Rate Loans. Due to historically low interest rate levels, borrowers generally have preferred fixed-rate loans in recent years. While we anticipate that our adjustable-rate loans will better offset the adverse effects on our net interest income of an increase in interest rates as compared to fixed-rate mortgages, the increased mortgage payments required of adjustable-rate loans in a rising interest rate environment could cause an increase in delinquencies and defaults. The marketability of the underlying property also may be adversely affected in a high interest rate environment. In addition, although adjustable-rate mortgage loans help make our asset base more responsive to changes in interest rates, the extent of this interest sensitivity is limited by the annual and lifetime interest rate adjustment limits.
Multi-Family and Commercial Real Estate Loans. Loans secured by multi-family and commercial real estate generally have larger balances and involve a greater degree of risk than one- to four-family residential mortgage loans. Of primary concern in multi-family and commercial real estate lending is the borrower’s creditworthiness and the feasibility and cash flow potential of the project. Payments on loans secured by income properties often depend on successful operation and management of the properties. As a result, repayment of such loans may be subject to a greater extent than residential real estate loans to adverse conditions in the real estate market or the economy. To monitor cash flows on income properties, we require borrowers and loan guarantors, where applicable, to provide annual financial statements on multi-family and commercial real estate loans. In reaching a decision on whether to make a multi-family or commercial real estate loan, we consider the net operating income of the property, the borrower’s expertise, credit history, profitability and the value of the underlying property. We require an environmental survey for multi-family and commercial real estate loans.
Construction Loans. Construction financing is generally considered to involve a higher degree of risk of loss than long-term financing on improved, occupied real estate. Risk of loss on a construction loan depends largely upon the accuracy of the initial
4
Table of Contents
estimate of the property’s value at completion of construction or development and the estimated cost (including interest) of construction. During the construction phase, a number of factors could result in delays and cost overruns. If the estimate of construction costs proves to be inaccurate, we may be required to advance funds beyond the amount originally committed to permit completion of the development. If the estimate of value proves to be inaccurate, we may be confronted, at or before the maturity of the loan, with a project having a value which is insufficient to assure full repayment. As a result of the foregoing, construction lending often involves the disbursement of substantial funds with repayment dependent, in part, on the success of the ultimate project rather than the ability of the borrower or guarantor to repay principal and interest. If we are forced to foreclose on a project before or at completion due to a default, there can be no assurance that we will be able to recover all of the unpaid balance of, and accrued interest on, the loan as well as related foreclosure and holding costs.
Commercial Business Loans. Unlike residential mortgage loans, which generally are made on the basis of the borrower’s ability to make repayment from his or her employment or other income, and which are secured by real property whose value tends to be more easily ascertainable, commercial business loans are of higher risk and typically are made on the basis of the borrower’s ability to make repayment from the cash flow of the borrower’s business. As a result, the availability of funds for the repayment of commercial business loans may depend substantially on the success of the business itself. Further, any collateral securing such loans may depreciate over time, may be difficult to appraise and may fluctuate in value.
Consumer Loans. Consumer loans may entail greater risk than do residential mortgage loans, particularly in the case of consumer loans that are unsecured or secured by assets that depreciate rapidly. In such cases, repossessed collateral for a defaulted consumer loan may not provide an adequate source of repayment for the outstanding loan and the remaining deficiency often does not warrant further substantial collection efforts against the borrower. In addition, consumer loan collections depend on the borrower’s continuing financial stability, and therefore are more likely to be adversely affected by job loss, divorce, illness or personal bankruptcy. Furthermore, the application of various federal and state laws, including federal and state bankruptcy and insolvency laws, may limit the amount which can be recovered on such loans.
Loan Originations, Purchases and Sales. Loan originations come from a number of sources. The primary source of loan originations are our in-house loan originators, and to a lesser extent, local mortgage brokers, advertising and referrals from customers. We occasionally purchase loans or participation interests in loans.
We consider loan sales as a part of our interest rate risk management efforts. We have the ability to sell longer-term fixed-rate loans in the secondary market based on prevailing market interest rate conditions, an analysis of the composition and risk of the loan portfolio, liquidity needs and interest rate risk management goals. We did not sell any loans in the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008. However, in 2009, we began to pursue a significant initiative to develop a meaningful secondary mortgage operation. We invested in personnel and systems to increase our ability to sell residential mortgages in the secondary market with the goals of increasing fee income and reducing interest rate risk through the sale of conforming long-term fixed-rate residential mortgages. With our systems in place, we have recently hired experienced loan production professionals in order to increase production. Since implementing this initiative, a significant percentage of all one-to four-family residential conforming loans we originate have been sold in the secondary market on a servicing retained basis. Such loans are primarily sold to Freddie Mac. Generally, loans are sold without recourse. We utilize the proceeds from these sales primarily to meet liquidity needs. The volume of loans sold totaled $37.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2010. We intend to continue to originate these types of loans for sale in the secondary market to grow our servicing portfolio and generate additional noninterest income.
At December 31, 2010, we retained the servicing rights on $41.3 million of loans for others, consisting primarily of fixed-rate mortgage loans sold without recourse to third parties. Loan repurchase commitments are agreements to repurchase loans previously sold upon the occurrence of conditions established in the contract, including default by the underlying borrower. At December 31, 2010, Naugatuck Valley Savings and Loan did not have any loans sold with recourse. Loan servicing includes collecting and remitting loan payments, accounting for principal and interest, contacting delinquent mortgagors, processing insurance and tax payments on behalf of borrowers, assisting in foreclosures and property dispositions when necessary and general administration of loans. We occasionally sell participation interests in loans.
Loan Approval Procedures and Authority. Our lending activities follow written, nondiscriminatory, underwriting standards and loan origination procedures established by our board of directors and management.
For one- to four-family loans and owner occupied residential construction loans, two members of the mortgage loan committee, one of which must be a vice president or above, may approve loans up to $417,000 and a majority of the members of the Board loan committee must approve loans over $417,000. For unsecured commercial business loans, a majority of the members of the Board must approve loans over $500,000 and two members of the board of directors loan committee must approve loans over $250,000 and up to $500,000. Unsecured business loans of $250,000 or less must be approved by two members of the officers’ loan committee. Loans of $100,000 or less which are unsecured can be approved by one member of the officers’ loan committee and later
5
Table of Contents
presented to the officers’ loan committee for ratification. For secured commercial loans and commercial construction loans, a majority of the members of the Board must approve loans over $1.5 million and two members of the board of directors loan committee must approve loans over $750,000 and up to $1.5 million. Loans of $500,001 to $750,000 secured by real estate, where the loan to value ratio is 80% or less supported by a conforming appraisal, can be approved by the officers’ loan committee. Loans of $500,000 or less secured by real estate where the loan-to-value is 80% or less can be approved by two members of the officers’ loan committee and for $100,000 or less secured by real estate with an 80% loan-to-value one member of the officers’ loan committee can approve with a later ratification by the officers’ loan committee. The board of directors must approve all consumer loans over $200,000. Various bank personnel have been delegated authority to approve smaller commercial loans and consumer loans.
Loans to One Borrower. The maximum amount that we may lend to one borrower and the borrower’s related entities is generally limited, by regulation, to 15% of our stated capital and allowance for loan losses. At December 31, 2010, our regulatory limit on loans to one borrower was $7.8 million. At that date, our largest lending relationship was $7.1 million and consisted of one residential mortgage and two commercial real estate loans all of which were performing according to the original repayment terms.
Loan Commitments. We issue commitments for fixed-rate and adjustable-rate mortgage loans conditioned upon the occurrence of certain events. Commitments to originate mortgage loans are legally binding agreements to lend to our customers and generally expire in 45 days or less.
Investment Activities
We have legal authority to invest in various types of liquid assets, including U.S. Treasury obligations, securities of various federal agencies and of state and municipal governments, mortgage-backed securities and certificates of deposit of federally insured institutions. Within certain regulatory limits, we also may invest a portion of our assets in corporate securities and mutual funds. We also are required to maintain an investment in Federal Home Loan Bank of Boston stock.
At December 31, 2010, our investment portfolio consisted of U.S. government and agency securities with maturities primarily less than five years, mortgage-backed securities issued by Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac and Ginnie Mae with stated final maturities of 30 years or less, collateralized mortgage obligations with stated final maturities of 30 years or less, and preferred money market securities with terms of primarily 91 days or less.
Our investment objectives are to provide and maintain liquidity, to maintain a balance of high quality, diversified investments to minimize risk, to provide collateral for pledging requirements, to establish an acceptable level of interest rate risk, to provide an alternate source of low-risk investments when demand for loans is weak, and to generate a favorable return. During 2010, we reduced credit risk by increasing our position in Ginnie Mae mortgage-backed securities which are classified as 0% risk weighted assets. Our board of directors has the overall responsibility for our investment portfolio, including approval of our investment policy and appointment of our Asset/Liability and Investment Committees. The Investment Committee meets regularly and is responsible for approval of investment strategies and monitoring of investment performance. Our Controller, as the designated investment portfolio manager, has the responsibility for the daily investment activities and is authorized to make investment decisions consistent with our investment policy.
Deposit Activities and Other Sources of Funds
General. Deposits and loan repayments are the major sources of our funds for lending and other investment purposes. Loan repayments are a relatively stable source of funds, while deposit inflows and outflows and loan prepayments are significantly influenced by general interest rates and money market conditions.
Deposit Accounts. The vast majority of our depositors are residents of the State of Connecticut. Deposits are attracted from within our primary market area through the offering of a broad selection of deposit instruments, including NOW accounts, checking accounts, money market accounts, regular savings accounts, club savings accounts, certificate accounts, health savings accounts and various retirement accounts. Generally, we do not utilize brokered funds. Deposit account terms vary according to the minimum balance required, the time periods the funds must remain on deposit and the interest rate, among other factors. In determining the terms of our deposit accounts, we consider the rates offered by our competition, profitability to us, matching deposit and loan products and customer preferences and concerns. We generally review our deposit mix and pricing weekly. Our current strategy is to offer competitive rates, but not be the market leader in every type and maturity.
Borrowings. We borrow from the Federal Home Loan Bank of Boston to supplement our supply of lendable funds and to meet deposit withdrawal requirements. The Federal Home Loan Bank functions as a central reserve bank providing credit for member financial institutions. As a member, we are required to own capital stock in the Federal Home Loan Bank of Boston and are authorized to apply for advances on the security of such stock and certain of our mortgage loans and other assets (principally securities which are
6
Table of Contents
obligations of, or guaranteed by, the United States), provided certain standards related to creditworthiness have been met. Advances are made under several different programs, each having its own interest rate and range of maturities. Depending on the program, limitations on the amount of advances are based either on a fixed percentage of an institution’s net worth or on the Federal Home Loan Bank’s assessment of the institution’s creditworthiness. Under its current credit policies, the Federal Home Loan Bank generally limits advances to 25% of a member’s assets, and short-term borrowings of less than one year may not exceed 10% of the institution’s assets. The Federal Home Loan Bank determines specific lines of credit for each member institution.
We also use securities sold under agreements to repurchase as a source of borrowings, and we occasionally borrow short-term from correspondent banks to cover temporary cash needs.
Subsidiaries
Naugatuck Valley Financial’s sole subsidiary is Naugatuck Valley Savings.
Naugatuck Valley Savings has one subsidiary, Naugatuck Valley Mortgage Servicing Corporation. Established in 1999 under Connecticut law, Naugatuck Valley Mortgage Servicing is a passive investment corporation organized in order to take advantage of certain state tax benefits. Its primary business is to service mortgage loans which we have originated and subsequently transferred to Naugatuck Valley Mortgage Servicing. At December 31, 2010, Naugatuck Valley Mortgage Servicing had $250.2 million in assets.
Personnel
At December 31, 2010, we had 128 full-time employees and 18 part-time employees, none of whom are represented by a collective bargaining unit. We believe our relationship with our employees is good.
Regulation and Supervision
General
Naugatuck Valley Savings is subject to extensive regulation, examination and supervision by the Office of Thrift Supervision, as its primary federal regulator, and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, as its deposits insurer. Naugatuck Valley Savings is a member of the Federal Home Loan Bank System and its deposit accounts are insured up to applicable limits by the Deposit Insurance Fund managed by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. Naugatuck Valley Savings must file reports with the Office of Thrift Supervision and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation concerning its activities and financial condition in addition to obtaining regulatory approvals prior to entering into certain transactions such as mergers with, or acquisitions of, other financial institutions. There are periodic examinations by the Office of Thrift Supervision and, under certain circumstances, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation to evaluate Naugatuck Valley Savings’ safety and soundness and compliance with various regulatory requirements. This regulation and supervision establishes a comprehensive framework of activities in which an institution can engage and is intended primarily for the protection of the insurance fund and depositors. The regulatory structure also gives the regulatory authorities extensive discretion in connection with their supervisory and enforcement activities and examination policies, including policies with respect to the classification of assets and the establishment of adequate loan loss reserves for regulatory purposes. Any change in such policies, whether by the Office of Thrift Supervision, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation or Congress, could have a material adverse impact on Naugatuck Valley Financial, Naugatuck Valley Mutual and Naugatuck Valley Savings and their operations. Naugatuck Valley Financial and Naugatuck Valley Mutual, as savings and loan holding companies, are required to file certain reports with, are subject to examination by, and otherwise must comply with the rules and regulations of the Office of Thrift Supervision. Naugatuck Valley Financial is also subject to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission under the federal securities laws.
The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (the “Dodd-Frank Act”), signed by the President on July 21, 2010, provides for the regulation and supervision of federal savings associations like Naugatuck Valley Savings to be transferred to the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, the agency that regulates national banks. The Office of the Comptroller of the Currency will assume primary responsibility for implementing and enforcing many of the laws and regulations applicable to federal savings associations. The transfer will occur over a transition period of up to one year from the July 21, 2010 effective date of the Dodd-Frank Act, subject to a possible six month extension. At the same time, the responsibility for supervising savings and loan holding companies like Naugatuck Valley Mutual and Naugatuck Valley Financial will be transferred to the Federal Reserve Board. The Dodd-Frank Act also provides for the creation of a new agency, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, as an independent bureau of the Federal Reserve Board, to take over the implementation of federal consumer financial protection and fair lending laws from the depository institution regulators. However, institutions of $10 billion or fewer in assets will continue to be examined for compliance with such laws and regulations by, and subject to the enforcement authority of, the prudential regulator rather than the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.
7
Table of Contents
Certain of the regulatory requirements that are applicable to Naugatuck Valley Savings, Naugatuck Valley Financial and Naugatuck Valley Mutual are described below. This description of statutes and regulations is not intended to be a complete explanation of such statutes and regulations and their effects on Naugatuck Valley Savings, Naugatuck Valley Financial and Naugatuck Valley Mutual and is qualified in its entirety by reference to the actual statutes and regulations.
Regulation of Federal Savings Institutions
Business Activities. Federal law and regulations govern the activities of federal savings banks, such as Naugatuck Valley Savings. These laws and regulations delineate the nature and extent of the activities in which federal savings banks may engage. In particular, certain lending authority for federal savings banks, e.g., commercial, non-residential real property loans and consumer loans, is limited to a specified percentage of the institution’s capital or assets.
The Dodd-Frank Act authorizes depository institutions to pay interest on demand deposits effective July 31, 2011. Depending upon competitive responses, that charge could have an adverse impact on Naugatuck Valley Savings’ interest expense.
Capital Requirements. The Office of Thrift Supervision’s capital regulations require federal savings institutions to meet three minimum capital standards: a 1.5% tangible capital to total assets ratio; a 4% Tier 1 capital to total assets leverage ratio (3% for institutions receiving the highest rating on the CAMELS examination rating system); and an 8% risk-based capital ratio. In addition, the prompt corrective action standards discussed below also establish, in effect, a minimum 2% tangible capital standard, a 4% leverage ratio (3% for institutions receiving the highest rating on the CAMELS system) and, together with the risk-based capital standard itself, a 4% Tier 1 risk-based capital standard. The Office of Thrift Supervision regulations also require that, in meeting the tangible, leverage and risk-based capital standards, institutions must generally deduct investments in and loans to subsidiaries engaged in activities as principal that are not permissible for a national bank.
The risk-based capital standard for savings institutions requires the maintenance of Tier 1 (core) and total capital (which is defined as core capital and supplementary capital, less certain specified deductions from total capital such as reciprocal holdings of depository institution capital, instruments and equity investments) to risk-weighted assets of at least 4% and 8%, respectively. In determining the amount of risk-weighted assets, all assets, including certain off-balance sheet activities, recourse obligations, residual interests and direct credit substitutes, are multiplied by a risk-weight factor of 0% to 100%, assigned by the Office of Thrift Supervision capital regulation based on the risks believed inherent in the type of asset. Core (Tier 1) capital is generally defined as common stockholders’ equity (including retained earnings), certain non-cumulative perpetual preferred stock and related surplus, and minority interests in equity accounts of consolidated subsidiaries less intangibles other than certain mortgage servicing rights and credit card relationships. The components of supplementary (Tier 2) capital currently include cumulative preferred stock, long-term perpetual preferred stock, mandatory convertible securities, subordinated debt and intermediate preferred stock, the allowance for loan and lease losses, limited to a maximum of 1.25% of risk-weighted assets, and up to 45% of unrealized gains on available-for-sale equity securities with readily determinable fair market values. Overall, the amount of supplementary capital included as part of total capital cannot exceed 100% of core capital.
The Office of Thrift Supervision also has authority to establish individual minimum capital requirements in appropriate cases upon a determination that an institution’s capital level is or may become inadequate in light of the particular circumstances. At December 31, 2010 Naugatuck Valley Savings met each of its capital requirements.
Prompt Corrective Regulatory Action. The Office of Thrift Supervision is required to take certain supervisory actions against undercapitalized institutions, the severity of which depends upon the institution’s degree of undercapitalization. Generally, a savings institution that has a ratio of total capital to risk weighted assets of less than 8%, a ratio of Tier 1 (core) capital to risk-weighted assets of less than 4% or a ratio of core capital to total assets of less than 4% (3% or less for institutions with the highest examination rating) is considered to be “undercapitalized.” A savings institution that has a total risk-based capital ratio less than 6%, a Tier 1 capital ratio of less than 3% or a leverage ratio that is less than 3% is considered to be “significantly undercapitalized” and a savings institution that has a tangible capital to assets ratio equal to or less than 2% is deemed to be “critically undercapitalized.” Subject to a narrow exception, the Office of Thrift Supervision is required to appoint a receiver or conservator within specified time frames for an institution that is “critically undercapitalized.” The regulation also provides that a capital restoration plan must be filed with the Office of Thrift Supervision within 45 days of the date a savings institution is deemed to have received notice that it is “undercapitalized,” “significantly undercapitalized” or “critically undercapitalized.” Compliance with the plan must be guaranteed by any parent holding company. In addition, numerous mandatory supervisory actions become immediately applicable to an undercapitalized institution, including, but not limited to, increased monitoring by regulators and restrictions on growth, capital distributions and expansion. The Office of Thrift Supervision could also take any one of a number of discretionary supervisory actions, including the issuance of a capital directive and the replacement of senior executive officers and directors. Significantly and critically undercapitalized institutions are subject to additional mandatory and discretionary restrictions.
8
Table of Contents
Loans to One Borrower. Federal law provides that savings institutions are generally subject to the limits on loans to one borrower applicable to national banks. Subject to certain exceptions, a savings institution may not make a loan or extend credit to a single or related group of borrowers in excess of 15% of its unimpaired capital and surplus. An additional amount may be lent, equal to 10% of unimpaired capital and surplus, if secured by specified readily-marketable collateral.
Standards for Safety and Soundness. The federal banking agencies have adopted Interagency Guidelines prescribing Standards for Safety and Soundness in various areas such as internal controls and information systems, internal audit, loan documentation and credit underwriting, interest rate exposure, asset growth and quality, earnings and compensation, fees and benefits. The guidelines set forth the safety and soundness standards that the federal banking agencies use to identify and address problems at insured depository institutions before capital becomes impaired. If the Office of Thrift Supervision determines that a savings institution fails to meet any standard prescribed by the guidelines, the Office of Thrift Supervision may require the institution to submit an acceptable plan to achieve compliance with the standard.
Community Reinvestment Act. All federal savings associations have a responsibility under the Community Reinvestment Act and related regulations to help meet the credit needs of their communities, including low- and moderate-income neighborhoods. An institution’s failure to comply with the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act could result in restrictions on its activities. Naugatuck Valley Savings and Loan received a “satisfactory” Community Reinvestment Act rating in its most recently completed examination.
Limitation on Capital Distributions. Office of Thrift Supervision regulations impose limitations upon all capital distributions by a savings institution, including cash dividends, payments to repurchase its shares and payments to stockholders of another institution in a cash-out merger. Under the regulations, an application to and the prior approval of the Office of Thrift Supervision is required before any capital distribution if the institution does not meet the criteria for “expedited treatment” of applications under Office of Thrift Supervision regulations (i.e., generally, examination and Community Reinvestment Act ratings in the two top categories), the total capital distributions for the calendar year exceed net income for that year plus the amount of retained net income for the preceding two years, the institution would be undercapitalized following the distribution or the distribution would otherwise be contrary to a statute, regulation or agreement with the Office of Thrift Supervision. If an application is not required, the institution must still provide prior notice to the Office of Thrift Supervision of the capital distribution if, like Naugatuck Valley Savings, it is a subsidiary of a holding company. If Naugatuck Valley Savings’ capital were ever to fall below its regulatory requirements or the Office of Thrift Supervision notified it that it was in need of increased supervision, its ability to make capital distributions could be restricted. In addition, the Office of Thrift Supervision could prohibit a proposed capital distribution that would otherwise be permitted by the regulation, if the agency determines that such distribution would constitute an unsafe or unsound practice.
Qualified Thrift Lender Test. Federal law requires savings institutions to meet a qualified thrift lender test. Under the test, a savings institution is required to either qualify as a “domestic building and loan association” under the Internal Revenue Code or maintain at least 65% of its “portfolio assets” (total assets less: (i) specified liquid assets up to 20% of total assets; (ii) intangibles, including goodwill; and (iii) the value of property used to conduct business) in certain “qualified thrift investments” (primarily residential mortgages and related investments, including certain mortgage-backed securities) in at least nine months out of each twelve-month period. Legislation has expanded the extent to which education loans, credit card loans and small business loans may be considered “qualified thrift investments.”
A savings institution that fails the qualified thrift lender test is subject to certain operating restrictions. The Dodd-Frank Act also made noncompliance with the qualified thrift lender test subject to agency enforcement action as a violation of law. As of December 31, 2010, Naugatuck Valley Savings maintained 86.7% of its portfolio assets in qualified thrift investments and, therefore, met the qualified thrift lender test.
Transactions with Related Parties. Federal law limits Naugatuck Valley Savings’ authority to make loans to, and engage in certain other transactions with (collectively, “covered transactions”), “affiliates” (i.e., generally, any company that controls or is under common control with an institution), including Naugatuck Valley Financial and Naugatuck Valley Mutual and their non-savings institution subsidiaries. The aggregate amount of covered transactions with any individual affiliate is limited to 10% of the capital and surplus of the savings institution. The aggregate amount of covered transactions with all affiliates is limited to 20% of the savings institution’s capital and surplus. Loans and other specified transactions with affiliates are required to be secured by collateral in an amount and of a type described in federal law. The purchase of low quality assets from affiliates is generally prohibited. Transactions with affiliates must be on terms and under circumstances that are at least as favorable to the institution as those prevailing at the time for comparable transactions with non-affiliated companies. In addition, savings institutions are prohibited from lending to any affiliate that is engaged in activities that are not permissible for bank holding companies and no savings institution may purchase the securities of any affiliate other than a subsidiary.
9
Table of Contents
The Sarbanes-Oxley Act generally prohibits loans by Naugatuck Valley Financial to its executive officers and directors. However, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act contains a specific exemption from such prohibition for loans by Naugatuck Valley Savings to its executive officers and directors in compliance with federal banking regulations. Federal regulations impose certain quantitative limits and require, among other things, that all loans or extensions of credit to executive officers and directors of insured institutions must be made on substantially the same terms, including interest rates and collateral, as those prevailing at the time for comparable transactions with other persons and must not involve more than the normal risk of repayment or present other unfavorable features. Naugatuck Valley Savings is therefore generally prohibited from making any new loans or extensions of credit to executive officers and directors at different rates or terms than those offered to the general public. Notwithstanding this rule, federal regulations permit Naugatuck Valley Savings to make loans to executive officers and directors at reduced interest rates if the loan is made under a benefit program generally available to all other employees and does not give preference to any executive officer or director over any other employee.
In addition, loans made to a director or executive officer in an amount that, when aggregated with the amount of all other loans to the person and his or her related interests, are in excess of the greater of $25,000 or 5% of Naugatuck Valley Savings’ capital and surplus, or, in any event, greater than $500,000, must be approved in advance by a majority of the disinterested members of the board of directors.
Loans to executive officers are subject to additional restrictions based on the category of loan involved.
Enforcement. The Office of Thrift Supervision has primary enforcement responsibility over federal savings institutions and has the authority to bring actions against the institution and all institution-affiliated parties, including stockholders, and any attorneys, appraisers and accountants who knowingly or recklessly participate in wrongful action likely to have an adverse effect on an insured institution. Formal enforcement action may range from the issuance of a capital directive or cease and desist order to removal of officers and/or directors to institution of receivership, conservatorship or termination of deposit insurance. Civil penalties cover a wide range of violations and can amount to $25,000 per day, or even $1 million per day in especially egregious cases. The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation has authority to recommend to the Director of the Office of Thrift Supervision that enforcement action be taken with respect to a particular savings institution. If action is not taken by the Director, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation has authority to take such action under certain circumstances. Federal law also establishes criminal penalties for certain violations.
The Office of the Comptroller of the Currency will assume primary enforcement authority over federal savings associations pursuant to the Dodd-Frank Act regulatory restructuring.
Assessments. Federal savings banks are required to pay assessments to the Office of Thrift Supervision to fund its operations. The general assessments, paid on a semi-annual basis, are based upon the savings institution’s total assets, including consolidated subsidiaries, financial condition and complexity of its portfolio. The Office of Thrift Supervision assessments paid by Naugatuck Valley Savings for the year ended December 31, 2010 totaled $137,332. The Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, which will succeed the Office of Thrift Supervision, is similarly funded through assessments on regulated institutions.
Insurance of Deposit Accounts. The deposits of Naugatuck Valley Savings are insured up to applicable limits by the Deposit Insurance Fund of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. The Deposit Insurance Fund is the successor to the Bank Insurance Fund and the Savings Association Insurance Fund, which were merged in 2006.
Under the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation’s existing risk-based assessment system, insured institutions are assigned to one of four risk categories based on supervisory evaluations, regulatory capital levels and certain other factors, with less risky institutions paying lower assessments. An institution’s assessment rate depends upon the category to which it is assigned. Effective April 1, 2009, assessment rates range from seven to 77.5 basis points. The Dodd-Frank Act requires the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation to amend its assessment procedures to base assessments on total assets less tangible equity rather than deposits. The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation has recently issued a proposed rule that, if finalized, would implement the change during the second quarter of 2011. No institution may pay a dividend if in default of the federal deposit insurance assessment.
The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation also imposed on all insured institutions a special emergency assessment of five basis points of total assets minus Tier 1 capital, as of June 30, 2009 (capped at ten basis points of an institution’s deposit assessment base) in order to cover losses to the Deposit Insurance Fund. That special assessment was collected on September 30, 2009. The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation provided for similar assessments during the final two quarters of 2009, if deemed necessary. However, in lieu of further special assessments, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation required insured institutions to prepay estimated quarterly risk-based assessments for the fourth quarter of 2009 through the fourth quarter of 2012. The estimated
10
Table of Contents
assessments, which include an assumed annual assessment base increase of 5%, were recorded as a prepaid expense asset as of December 31, 2009. As of December 31, 2009, and each quarter thereafter, a charge to earnings will be recorded for each regular assessment with an offsetting credit to the prepaid asset.
Due to difficult economic conditions, deposit insurance per account owner was recently raised to $250,000. That change was made permanent by the Dodd-Frank Act. In addition, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation adopted an optional Temporary Liquidity Guarantee Program by which, for a fee, noninterest bearing transaction accounts receive unlimited insurance coverage until December 31, 2009, subsequently extended until June 30, 2010, and certain senior unsecured debt issued by institutions and their holding companies during specified periods would be guaranteed by the FDIC through June 30, 2012, or in certain cases, to December 31, 2012. Naugatuck Valley Savings made the business decision to participate in the unlimited noninterest bearing transaction account coverage and Naugatuck Valley Savings and its holding companies opted to participate in the unsecured debt guarantee program. The Dodd-Frank Act extends the unlimited coverage for certain non-interest bearing transaction accounts through December 31, 2012.
In addition to the assessment for deposit insurance, institutions are required to make payments on bonds issued in the late 1980s by the Financing Corporation to recapitalize a predecessor deposit insurance fund. That payment is established quarterly and during the four quarters ending December 31, 2010 averaged 1.04 basis points of assessable deposits.
The Dodd-Frank Act increased the minimum target Deposit Insurance Fund ratio from 1.15% of estimated insured deposits to 1.35% of estimated insured deposits. The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation must seek to achieve the 1.35% ratio by September 30, 2020. Insured institutions with assets of $10 billion or more are supposed to fund the increase. The Dodd-Frank Act eliminated the 1.5% maximum fund ratio, instead leaving it to the discretion of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.
The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation has authority to increase insurance assessments. A significant increase in insurance premiums would likely have an adverse effect on the operating expenses and results of operations of Naugatuck Valley Savings. Management cannot predict what insurance assessment rates will be in the future.
Insurance of deposits may be terminated by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation upon a finding that the institution has engaged in unsafe or unsound practices, is in an unsafe or unsound condition to continue operations or has violated any applicable law, regulation, rule, order or condition imposed by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation or the Office of Thrift Supervision. The management of Naugatuck Valley Savings does not know of any practice, condition or violation that might lead to termination of deposit insurance.
Federal Home Loan Bank System. Naugatuck Valley Savings is a member of the Federal Home Loan Bank System, which consists of twelve regional Federal Home Loan Banks. The Federal Home Loan Bank provides a central credit facility primarily for member institutions. Naugatuck Valley Savings, as a member of the Federal Home Loan Bank of Boston, is required to acquire and hold shares of capital stock in that Federal Home Loan Bank. Naugatuck Valley Savings was in compliance with this requirement with an investment in Federal Home Loan Bank stock at December 31, 2010 of $6.3 million. Federal Home Loan Bank advances must be secured by specified types of collateral.
The Federal Home Loan Banks are required to provide funds for the resolution of insolvent thrifts in the late 1980s and to contribute funds for affordable housing programs. These requirements, as well as general financial results, could reduce the amount of dividends that the Federal Home Loan Banks pay to their members and could also result in the Federal Home Loan Banks imposing a higher rate of interest on advances to their members. If dividends were reduced, or interest on future Federal Home Loan Bank advances increased, our net interest income would likely also be reduced.
Federal Reserve System
The Federal Reserve Board regulations require savings institutions to maintain non-interest earning reserves against their transaction accounts (primarily Negotiable Order of Withdrawal (NOW) and regular checking accounts). For 2010, the regulations generally provided that reserves be maintained against aggregate transaction accounts as follows: a 3% reserve ratio was assessed on net transaction accounts up to and including $55.2 million; a 10% reserve ratio was applied above $44.4 million. The first $10.7 million of otherwise reservable balances (subject to adjustments by the Federal Reserve Board) were exempted from the reserve requirements. The amounts are adjusted annually and, for 2011, require a 3% ratio for up to $58.8 million and an exception of $10.7 million. Naugatuck Valley Savings complies with the foregoing requirements.
11
Table of Contents
Holding Company Regulation
General. Naugatuck Valley Financial and Naugatuck Valley Mutual are savings and loan holding companies within the meaning of federal law. As such, they are registered with the Office of Thrift Supervision and are subject to Office of Thrift Supervision regulations, examinations, supervision, reporting requirements and regulations concerning corporate governance and activities. In addition, the Office of Thrift Supervision has enforcement authority over Naugatuck Valley Financial and Naugatuck Valley Mutual and their non-savings institution subsidiaries. Among other things, this authority permits the Office of Thrift Supervision to restrict or prohibit activities that are determined to be a serious risk to Naugatuck Valley Savings.
As part of the Dodd-Frank Act regulatory restructuring, the responsibilities of the Office of Thrift Supervision as to savings and loan holding companies are being transferred to the Federal Reserve Board. The Federal Reserve Board is the agency that regulates bank holding companies. The transfer will occur one year from the July 21, 2010 effective date of the Dodd-Frank Act subject to a possible six month extension.
Restrictions Applicable to Mutual Holding Companies. According to federal law and Office of Thrift Supervision regulations, a mutual holding company, such as Naugatuck Valley Mutual, may generally engage in the following activities: (i) investing in the stock of a bank; (ii) acquiring a mutual association through the merger of such association into a bank subsidiary of such holding company or an interim bank subsidiary of such holding company; (iii) merging with or acquiring another holding company, one of whose subsidiaries is a bank; and (iv) any activity approved by the Federal Reserve Board for a bank holding company or financial holding company or previously approved by Office of Thrift Supervision for multiple savings and loan holding companies. In addition, mutual holding companies may engage in activities permitted for financial holding companies. Financial holding companies may engage in a broad array of financial service activities including insurance and securities.
Federal law prohibits a savings and loan holding company, including a federal mutual holding company, from directly or indirectly, or through one or more subsidiaries, acquiring more than 5% of the voting stock of another savings association, or its holding company, without prior written approval of the Office of Thrift Supervision. Federal law also prohibits a savings and loan holding company from acquiring more than 5% of a company engaged in activities other than those authorized for savings and loan holding companies by federal law, or acquiring or retaining control of a depository institution that is not insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. In evaluating applications by holding companies to acquire savings associations, the Office of Thrift Supervision must consider the financial and managerial resources and future prospects of the company and institution involved, the effect of the acquisition on the risk to the insurance funds, the convenience and needs of the community and competitive factors.
The Office of Thrift Supervision is prohibited from approving any acquisition that would result in a multiple savings and loan holding company controlling savings associations in more than one state, except: (i) the approval of interstate supervisory acquisitions by savings and loan holding companies, and (ii) the acquisition of a savings association in another state if the laws of the state of the target savings institution specifically permit such acquisitions. The states vary in the extent to which they permit interstate savings and loan holding company acquisitions.
Although savings and loan holding companies are not currently subject to regulatory capital requirements or specific restrictions on the payment of dividends or other capital distributions, federal regulations do prescribe such restrictions on subsidiary savings institutions. Naugatuck Valley Savings must notify the Office of Thrift Supervision 30 days before declaring any dividend and comply with the additional restrictions described below. In addition, the financial impact of a holding company on its subsidiary institution is a matter that is evaluated by the Office of Thrift Supervision and the agency has authority to order cessation of activities or divestiture of subsidiaries deemed to pose a threat to the safety and soundness of the institution.
Stock Holding Company Subsidiary Regulation. The Office of Thrift Supervision has adopted regulations governing the two-tier mutual holding company form of organization and subsidiary stock holding companies that are controlled by mutual holding companies. Naugatuck Valley Financial is the stock holding company subsidiary of Naugatuck Valley Mutual. Naugatuck Valley Financial is permitted to engage in activities that are permitted for Naugatuck Valley Mutual subject to the same restrictions and conditions.
Capital Requirements. Savings and loan holding companies are not currently subject to specific regulatory capital requirements. The Dodd-Frank Act, however, requires the Federal Reserve Board to promulgate consolidated capital requirements for depository institution holding companies that are no less stringent, both quantitatively and in terms of components of capital, than those applicable to institutions themselves. There is a five year transition period from the July 21, 2010 date of enactment of the Dodd-Frank Act before the capital requirements will apply to savings and loan holding companies. The Dodd-Frank Act also requires the Federal Reserve Board to promulgate regulations implementing the “source of strength” policy that holding companies act as a source of strength to their subsidiary depository institutions by providing capital, liquidity and other support in times of financial stress.
12
Table of Contents
Waivers of Dividends by Naugatuck Valley Mutual. Office of Thrift Supervision regulations require Naugatuck Valley Mutual to notify the Office of Thrift Supervision if it proposes to waive receipt of dividends from Naugatuck Valley Financial. The Office of Thrift Supervision reviews dividend waiver notices on a case-by-case basis, and, in general, does not object to any such waiver if: (i) the waiver would not be detrimental to the safe and sound operation of the savings institution; and (ii) the mutual holding company’s board of directors determines that such waiver is consistent with such directors’ fiduciary duties to the mutual holding company’s members.
The Dodd-Frank Act addressed the issue of dividend waivers in the context of the transfer of the supervision of savings and loan holding companies to the Federal Reserve Board. The Dodd-Frank Act specified that dividends may be waived if certain conditions are met, including that the Federal Reserve Board does not object after being given written notice of the dividend and proposed waiver. The Dodd-Frank Act indicates that the Federal Reserve Board may not object to such a waiver (i) if the mutual holding company involved has, prior to December 1, 2009, reorganized into a mutual holding company structure, engaged in a minority stock offering and waived dividends; (ii) the board of directors of the mutual holding company expressly determines that a waiver of the dividend is consistent with its fiduciary duties to members; and (iii) the wavier would not be detrimental to the safe and sound operation of the savings association subsidiaries of the holding company. The Federal Reserve has not previously permitted dividend waivers by mutual bank holding companies and may object to dividend waivers involving mutual savings and loan holding companies, notwithstanding the referenced language in the Dodd-Frank Act.
Conversion of Naugatuck Valley Mutual to Stock Form. Office of Thrift Supervision regulations permit Naugatuck Valley Mutual to convert from the mutual form of organization to the capital stock form of organization. In a conversion transaction, a new holding company would be formed as the successor to Naugatuck Valley Financial, Naugatuck Valley Mutual’s corporate existence would end, and certain depositors of Naugatuck Valley Savings would receive the right to subscribe for additional shares of the new holding company. In a conversion transaction, each share of common stock held by stockholders other than Naugatuck Valley Mutual would be automatically converted into a number of shares of common stock of the new holding company based on an exchange ratio determined at the time of conversion that ensures that stockholders other than Naugatuck Valley Mutual own the same percentage of common stock in the new holding company as they owned in Naugatuck Valley Financial immediately before conversion. The total number of shares held by stockholders other than Naugatuck Valley Mutual after a conversion transaction would be increased by any purchases by such stockholders in the stock offering conducted as part of the conversion transaction.
Acquisition of Control. Under the federal Change in Bank Control Act, a notice must be submitted to the Office of Thrift Supervision if any person (including a company), or group acting in concert, seeks to acquire “control” of a savings and loan holding company or savings institution. Under certain circumstances, a change of control may occur, and prior notice is required, upon the acquisition of 10% or more of the outstanding voting stock of the company or institution, unless the Office of Thrift Supervision has found that the acquisition will not result in a change of control of the company. A change in control definitively occurs upon the acquisition of 25% or more of a company’s outstanding voting stock. Under the Change in Bank Control Act, the Office of Thrift Supervision has 60 days from the filing of a complete notice to act, taking into consideration certain factors, including the financial and managerial resources of the acquirer and the anti-trust effects of the acquisition. Any company that so acquires control would then be subject to regulation as a savings and loan holding company.
Financial Reform Legislation
On July 21, 2010, President Obama signed the Dodd-Frank Act. In addition to providing for the elimination of the Office of Thrift Supervision and creating the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, the Dodd-Frank Act, among other things, requires changes in the way that institutions are assessed for deposit insurance, mandates the imposition of consolidated capital requirements on savings and loan holding companies, requires that originators of securitized loans retain a percentage of the risk for the transferred loans, reduces the federal preemption afforded to federal savings associations and contains a number of reforms related to mortgage origination. Many of the provisions of the Dodd-Frank Act require the issuance of regulations before their impact on operations can be fully assessed by management. However, there is a significant possibility that the Dodd-Frank Act will, at a minimum, result in increased regulatory burden and compliance costs for Naugatuck Valley Savings, Naugatuck Valley Financial and Naugatuck Valley Mutual.
Future Legislation. Various legislation affecting financial institutions and the financial industry is from time to time introduced in Congress. Such legislation may change banking statutes and the operating environment of the Company and its subsidiaries in substantial and unpredictable ways, and could increase or decrease the cost of doing business, limit or expand permissible activities or affect the competitive balance depending upon whether any of this potential legislation will be enacted, and if enacted, the effect that it or any implementing regulations, would have on the financial condition or results of operations of the Company or any of its subsidiaries. With the recent enactments of the Dodd-Frank Act, the nature and extent of future legislative and regulatory changes affecting financial institutions is very unpredictable at this time.
13
Table of Contents
Federal Securities Laws
Naugatuck Valley Financial’s common stock is registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Naugatuck Valley Financial is subject to the information, proxy solicitation, insider trading restrictions and other requirements under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
Executive Officers of the Registrant
The executive officers of Naugatuck Valley Financial, Naugatuck Valley Mutual Holding Company and Naugatuck Valley Savings are elected annually by the Board of Directors and serve at the Board’s discretion. The executive officers of Naugatuck Valley Financial, Naugatuck Valley Mutual Holding Company and Naugatuck Valley Savings are:
| Name |
Position | |
| John C. Roman |
President and Chief Executive Officer of Naugatuck Valley Financial, Naugatuck Valley Mutual Holding Company and Naugatuck Valley Savings and Loan | |
| Dominic J. Alegi, Jr. |
Executive Vice President of Naugatuck Valley Financial, Naugatuck Valley Mutual Holding Company and Naugatuck Valley Savings and Loan | |
| Mark S. Graveline |
Senior Vice President of Naugatuck Valley Financial and Naugatuck Valley Mutual Holding Company; Senior Vice President and Chief Lending Officer of Naugatuck Valley Savings and Loan | |
| William C. Nimons |
Senior Vice President of Naugatuck Valley Financial, Naugatuck Valley Mutual Holding Company and Naugatuck Valley Savings and Loan | |
| Lee R. Schlesinger |
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Naugatuck Valley Financial, Naugatuck Valley Mutual Holding Company and Naugatuck Valley Savings and Loan | |
Below is information regarding the executive officers who are not also directors. Unless otherwise stated, each executive officer has held his current position for at least the last five years. Ages presented are as of December 31, 2010.
Dominic J. Alegi, Jr. has served as Executive Vice President of Naugatuck Valley Financial and Naugatuck Valley Mutual since September 2004 and has been Executive Vice President of Naugatuck Valley Savings since 1989. Mr. Alegi has served with Naugatuck Valley Savings since 1970. Age 64.
Mark S. Graveline has served as Senior Vice President of Naugatuck Valley Financial and Naugatuck Valley Mutual and as Senior Vice President and Chief Lending Officer of Naugatuck Valley Savings since February 2005. Mr. Graveline previously was a Vice President of Banknorth-Connecticut and a Vice President of North American Bank and Trust. Age 54.
William C. Nimons has served as Senior Vice President of Naugatuck Valley Financial and Naugatuck Valley Mutual since September 2004 and has been Senior Vice President of Naugatuck Valley Savings since 2001. Mr. Nimons previously was the Manager-Network Management of Prudential Real Estate and Relocation, a real estate and relocation firm and was an Executive Vice President at Shelton Savings Bank. Age 64.
Lee R. Schlesinger was appointed Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Naugatuck Valley Mutual, Naugatuck Valley Financial and Naugatuck Valley Savings in December, 2007. Before then, he served as Vice President and Treasurer of Naugatuck Valley Financial and Naugatuck Valley Mutual since September 2004, and as Vice President and Treasurer of Naugatuck Valley Savings since August 2004. Mr. Schlesinger served as Vice President and Controller of Naugatuck Valley Savings from 2003 to 2004 and as Assistant Vice President and Controller of Naugatuck Valley Savings from 2000 to 2003. Mr. Schlesinger has served with Naugatuck Valley Savings since 1983. Age 50.
14
Table of Contents
| ITEM 1A. | RISK FACTORS. |
Risks Related to our Business
Our portfolio of loans with a higher risk of loss have increased recently and may increase further as a result of our continued origination of commercial loans.
Recently, we have emphasized and grown our multi-family and commercial real estate and commercial business lending. At December 31, 2010, $195.0 million, or 40.5%, of our loan portfolio consisted of multi-family and commercial real estate and commercial business loans, increases of 17.3% from $166.3 million at December 31, 2009 and 51.6% from $128.6 million at December 31, 2008. Multi-family and commercial real estate and commercial business loans have a higher risk of default and loss than owner-occupied single-family residential mortgage loans because repayment of the loans often depends on the successful operation of the property and the income stream of the borrower. Such loans also typically involve larger loan balances to single borrowers or groups of related borrowers than single-family residential loans. Also, many of our commercial borrowers have more than one loan outstanding with us. Consequently, an adverse development with respect to one loan or one credit relationship can expose us to a significantly greater risk of loss compared to an adverse development with respect to a residential mortgage loan.
Our non-performing assets have increased significantly and expose us to increased risk of loss, which may negatively affect our earnings.
Our non-performing assets have increased recently as a result of the recent economic recession. At December 31, 2010, we had total non-performing assets of $18.3 million, or 3.2% of total assets, a $12.2 million increase from December 31, 2009 and a $15.6 million increase from December 31, 2008. Our non-performing assets adversely affect our net income in various ways. We do not record interest income on non-accrual loans or investments or on real estate owned. We must reserve for probable losses, which are established through a current period charge to income in the provision for loan losses, and from time to time, write down the value of properties in our other real estate owned portfolio to reflect changing market values. Additionally, there are legal fees associated with the resolution of problem assets as well as carrying costs such as taxes, insurance and maintenance related to our other real estate owned. Further, the resolution of non-performing assets requires the active involvement of management, which can distract us from the overall supervision of operations and other income-producing activities of Naugatuck Valley Savings and Loan. Finally, if our estimate of the allowance for loan losses is inadequate, we will have to increase the allowance accordingly. At December 31, 2010, our allowance for loan losses amounted to $6.4 million, or 1.3% of total loans outstanding and 35.7% of nonperforming loans.
The recent economic recession could continue to increase our level of nonperforming loans and/or reduce demand for our products and services, which would lead to lower revenue, higher loan losses and lower earnings.
Our business activities and earnings are affected by general business conditions in the United States and in our local market area. These conditions include short-term and long-term interest rates, inflation, unemployment levels, monetary supply, consumer confidence and spending, fluctuations in both debt and equity capital markets, and the strength of the economy in the United States generally and in our market area in particular. The national economy has recently experienced a recession, with rising unemployment and foreclosure levels, declines in real estate values and an erosion in consumer confidence. A continuation of these or other events that adversely affect household and/or corporate incomes could impair the ability of our borrowers to repay their loans in accordance with their terms. Most of our loans are secured by real estate or made to businesses in the Greater Naugatuck Valley. As a result of this concentration, a prolonged or more severe downturn in the local economy could result in significant increases in nonperforming loans, which would negatively impact our interest income and result in higher provisions for loan losses, which would hurt our earnings. The economic downturn could also result in reduced demand for credit or fee-based products and services, which would negatively impact our revenues.
Our strategy of controlling commercial loan growth may have a negative effect on our earnings.
At December 31, 2010, our construction loan portfolio, commercial real estate and multi-family loan portfolio and commercial business loan portfolio amounted to 75.0%, 313.2% and 62.7%, respectively, of our total risked-based capital at that date. These percentages are within the limits of the loan concentration policy that we have established for these types of higher risk loans. See “Item 1. Business – Lending Activities – General” for further information regarding the policy limits. We intend to maintain our construction loan, commercial real estate and multi-family loan, and commercial business loan portfolios, as a percentage of total risked-based capital, at approximately the same percentage levels as at December 31, 2010. Our regulators may instruct or advise us to reduce these concentration levels even further if they deem it warranted. Commercial loans generally have higher yields than residential mortgage loans because they are considered to have a higher risk of loss. Our controlled growth strategy, or any change in strategy that makes it more stringent, may have a negative effect on our earnings.
15
Table of Contents
The unseasoned nature of our commercial and construction loan portfolio may expose us to increased lending risks.
Our multi-family and commercial real estate, commercial business and construction loan portfolio has increased $136.4 million, or 152.4%, from $89.5 million at December 31, 2006 to $225.9 million at December 31, 2010. Many of our multi-family, commercial real estate, commercial business and construction loans are unseasoned, meaning that they were originated recently. Our limited experience with these loans does not provide us with a significant payment history pattern with which to judge future collectibility. As a result, it may be difficult to predict the future performance of this part of our loan portfolio. These loans may have delinquency or charge-off levels above our expectations, which could negatively affect our future performance. At December 31, 2010, we had $23.4 million of commercial and construction loans that have had their terms extended and are still accounted for as performing.
Higher loan losses could require us to increase our allowance for loan losses, which may negatively impact our earnings.
When we loan money we incur the risk that our borrowers will not repay their loans. We reserve for loan losses by establishing an allowance through a charge to earnings. The amount of this allowance is based on our assessment of loan losses inherent in our loan portfolio. The process for determining the amount of the allowance is critical to our financial results and condition. It requires subjective and complex judgments about the future, including forecasts of economic or market conditions that might impair the ability of our borrowers to repay their loans. We might underestimate the loan losses inherent in our loan portfolio and have loan losses in excess of the amount reserved. We might increase the allowance because of changing economic conditions. For example, in a rising interest rate environment, borrowers with adjustable-rate loans could see their payments increase. There may be a significant increase in the number of borrowers who are unable or unwilling to repay their loans, resulting in our charging off more loans and increasing our allowance. In addition, when real estate values decline, the potential severity of loss on a real estate-secured loan can increase significantly, especially in the case of loans with high combined loan-to-value ratios. The recent decline in the national economy and the local economies of the areas in which our loans are concentrated could result in an increase in loan delinquencies, foreclosures or repossessions resulting in increased charge-off amounts and the need for additional loan loss provisions in future periods. In addition, our determination as to the amount of our allowance for loan losses is subject to review by our primary regulator, the Office of Thrift Supervision, as part of its examination process, which may result in the establishment of an additional allowance based upon the judgment of the Office of Thrift Supervision after a review of the information available at the time of its examination. Our allowance for loan losses amounted to 1.3% of total loans outstanding and 35.7% of nonperforming loans at December 31, 2010. Our allowance for loan losses at December 31, 2010, may not be sufficient to cover future loan losses. A large loss could deplete the allowance and require increased provisions to replenish the allowance, which would negatively affect earnings.
Our emphasis on residential mortgage and commercial real estate loans exposes us to a risk of loss due to a decline in property values.
At December 31, 2010, $219.3 million, or 45.6%, of our loan portfolio consisted of one- to four-family residential mortgage loans, $34.8 million, or 7.2%, of our loan portfolio consisted of home equity loans and $160.2 million, or 33.3% of our loan portfolio consisted of multi-family and commercial real estate. We originate home equity lines of credit with maximum combined loan-to-value ratios of up to 75%. Recent declines in the housing market and the commercial real estate market have resulted in declines in real estate values in our market area. These declines in real estate values could cause some of our mortgage, home equity and multi-family and commercial real estate loans to be inadequately collateralized which would expose us to a greater risk of loss in the event that we seek to recover on defaulted loans by selling the real estate collateral.
Concentration of loans in our primary market area may increase risk.
Our success depends primarily on the general economic conditions in the State of Connecticut, as nearly all of our loans are to customers in this market, particularly our local greater Naugatuck Valley market area. Accordingly, the local economic conditions in Connecticut have a significant impact on the ability of our borrowers to repay loans. As such, a decline in real estate valuations in this market would lower the value of the collateral securing those loans. In addition, a significant weakening in general economic conditions such as inflation, recession, unemployment, or other factors beyond our control could negatively affect our financial results.
16
Table of Contents
Income from secondary mortgage market operations is volatile, and we may incur losses or charges with respect to our secondary mortgage market operations which would negatively effect our earnings.
We generally sell in the secondary market the fixed-rate residential mortgage loans that we originate, earning non-interest income in the form of gains on sale. When interest rates rise, the demand for mortgage loans tends to fall and may reduce the number of loans available for sale. When interest rates fall, the demand for fixed-rate mortgage loans also tends to fall and may reduce the number of loans available for sale. In addition to interest rate levels, weak or deteriorating economic conditions also tend to reduce loan demand. Although we sell loans in the secondary market without recourse, we are required to give customary representations and warranties to the buyers. If we breach those representations and warranties, the buyers can require us to repurchase the loans and we may incur a loss on the repurchase. Because we generally retain the servicing rights on the loans we sell in the secondary market, we are required to record a mortgage servicing right asset, which we test quarterly for impairment. The value of mortgage servicing rights tend to increase with rising interest rates and to decrease with falling interest rates. If we are required to take an impairment charge, that would hurt our earnings.
Recently enacted financial regulatory reform may have a material impact on our operations.
On July 21, 2010, the President signed into law the Dodd-Frank Act. The Dodd-Frank Act restructures the regulation of depository institutions. Under the Dodd-Frank Act, the Office of Thrift Supervision, which currently regulates Naugatuck Valley Savings and Loan, will be merged into the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, which regulates national banks, effective July 21, 2011. Savings and loan holding companies, including Naugatuck Valley Financial, will be regulated by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. Also included is the creation of a new federal agency to administer consumer protection and fair lending laws, a function that is now performed by the depository institution regulators. The federal preemption of state laws currently accorded federally chartered depository institutions will be reduced as well and State Attorneys General will have greater authority to bring a suit against a federally chartered institution, such as Naugatuck Valley Savings and Loan, for violations of certain state and federal consumer protection laws. The Dodd-Frank Act also will impose consolidated capital requirements on savings and loan holding companies effective in five years, which will limit our ability to borrow at the holding company and invest the proceeds from such borrowings as capital in Naugatuck Valley Savings and Loan that could be leveraged to support additional growth. The Dodd-Frank Act contains various other provisions designed to enhance the regulation of depository institutions and prevent the recurrence of a financial crisis such as occurred in 2008-2009. The full impact of the Dodd-Frank Act on our business and operations will not be known for years until regulations implementing the statute are written and adopted. The Dodd-Frank Act may have a material impact on our operations, particularly through increased regulatory burden and compliance costs.
In addition to the enactment of the Dodd-Frank Act, the federal regulatory agencies recently have begun to take stronger supervisory actions against financial institutions that have experienced increased loan losses and other weaknesses as a result of the current economic crisis. These actions include the entering into of written agreements and cease and desist orders that place certain limitations on their operations. Federal bank regulators recently have also been using with more frequency their ability to impose individual minimal capital requirements on banks, which requirements may be higher than those imposed under the Dodd-Frank Act or which would otherwise qualify the bank as being “well capitalized” under the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation’s prompt corrective action regulations. If Naugatuck Valley Financial or Naugatuck Valley Savings and Loan were to become subject to a supervisory agreement or higher individual capital requirements, such action may have a negative impact on their ability to execute their business plans, as well as their ability to grow, pay dividends or engage in mergers and acquisitions and may result in restrictions in their operations. See “Regulation and Supervision – Federal Banking Regulation – Capital Requirements” for a discussion of regulatory capital requirements.
Changes in interest rates could reduce our net interest income and earnings.
Our net interest income is the interest we earn on loans and investments less the interest we pay on our deposits and borrowings. Our net interest spread is the difference between the yield we earn on our assets and the interest rate we pay for deposits and our other sources of funding. Changes in interest rates—up or down—could adversely affect our net interest spread and, as a result, our net interest income and net interest margin. Although the yield we earn on our assets and our funding costs tend to move in the same direction in response to changes in interest rates, one can rise or fall faster than the other, causing our net interest margin to expand or contract. Our liabilities tend to be shorter in duration than our assets, so they may adjust faster in response to changes in interest rates. As a result, when interest rates rise, our funding costs may rise faster than the yield we earn on our assets, causing our net interest margin to contract. This contraction could be more severe following a prolonged period of lower interest rates, as a larger proportion of our fixed rate residential loan portfolio will have been originated at those lower rates and borrowers may be more reluctant or unable to sell their homes in a higher interest rate environment. Changes in the slope of the “yield curve” —or the spread between short-term and long-term interest rates—could also reduce our net interest margin. Normally, the yield curve is upward sloping, meaning short-term rates are lower than long-term rates. Because our liabilities tend to be shorter in duration than our assets,
17
Table of Contents
when the yield curve flattens or even inverts, we could experience pressure on our net interest margin as our cost of funds increases relative to the yield we can earn on our assets.
Turmoil in the financial markets could have an adverse effect on our financial position or results of operations.
Beginning in 2008, United States and global financial markets experienced severe disruption and volatility, and general economic conditions have declined significantly. Adverse developments in credit quality, asset values and revenue opportunities throughout the financial services industry, as well as general uncertainty regarding the economic and regulatory environment, have had a negative impact on the industry. The United States and the governments of other countries have taken steps to try to stabilize the financial system, including investing in financial institutions, and have implemented programs intended to improve general economic conditions. The U.S. Department of the Treasury created the Capital Purchase Program under the Troubled Asset Relief Program, pursuant to which the Treasury Department provided additional capital to participating financial institutions through the purchase of preferred stock or other securities. Other measures include homeowner relief that encourages loan restructuring and modification; the establishment of significant liquidity and credit facilities for financial institutions and investment banks; the lowering of the federal funds rate; regulatory action against short selling practices; a temporary guaranty program for money market funds; the establishment of a commercial paper funding facility to provide back-stop liquidity to commercial paper issuers; and coordinated international efforts to address illiquidity and other weaknesses in the banking sector. Notwithstanding the actions of the United States and other governments, there can be no assurances that these efforts will be successful in restoring industry, economic or market conditions to their previous levels and that they will not result in adverse unintended consequences. Factors that could continue to pressure financial services companies, including Naugatuck Valley Financial, are numerous and include (1) worsening credit quality, leading among other things to increases in loan losses and allowances for loan losses, (2) continued or worsening disruption and volatility in financial markets, leading among other things to continuing reductions in asset values, (3) capital and liquidity concerns regarding financial institutions generally, (4) limitations resulting from or imposed in connection with governmental actions intended to stabilize or provide additional regulation of the financial system, or (5) recessionary conditions that are deeper or last longer than currently anticipated.
If we conclude that the decline in value of any of our investment securities is other than temporary, we are required to write down the value of that security.
Companies are required to record other-than-temporary impairment if they have the intent to sell, or will more likely than not be required to sell, an impaired debt security before recovery of its amortized cost basis. In addition, companies are required to record other-than-temporary impairment for the amount of credit losses, regardless of the intent or requirement to sell. We evaluate investments that have a fair value less than book value for other-than-temporary impairment on a quarterly basis. Changes in the expected cash flows, credit enhancement levels or credit ratings of investment securities and/or prolonged price declines may result in our concluding in future periods that the impairment of these securities is other-than temporary, which would require a charge to earnings to write down the value of these securities. Any charges for other-than-temporary impairment would not impact cash flow, tangible capital or liquidity.
Increased and/or special FDIC assessments will hurt our earnings.
The recent economic recession has caused a high level of bank failures, which has dramatically increased FDIC resolution costs and led to a significant reduction in the balance of the Deposit Insurance Fund. As a result, the FDIC has significantly increased the initial base assessment rates paid by financial institutions for deposit insurance. Increases in the base assessment rate have increased our deposit insurance costs and negatively impacted our earnings. In addition, in May 2009, the FDIC imposed a special assessment on all insured institutions. Our special assessment, which was reflected in earnings for the quarter ended June 30, 2009, was $247,000. In lieu of imposing an additional special assessment, the FDIC required all institutions to prepay their assessments for the fourth quarter of 2009 and all of 2010, 2011 and 2012. Additional increases in the base assessment rate or special assessments would negatively impact our earnings.
Strong competition within our market area could reduce our profits and slow growth.
We face intense competition both in making loans and attracting deposits. This competition has made it more difficult for us to make new loans and at times has forced us to offer higher deposit rates. Price competition for loans and deposits might result in us earning less on our loans and paying more on our deposits, which would reduce net interest income. Competition also makes it more difficult to grow loans and deposits. As of June 30, 2010, which is the most recent date for which information is available, we held less than 2.0% of the deposits in each of the counties in which our offices are located. Several of the institutions with which we compete have substantially greater resources and lending limits than we have and may offer services that we do not provide. We expect competition to increase in the future as a result of legislative, regulatory and technological changes and the continuing trend of
18
Table of Contents
consolidation in the financial services industry. Our profitability depends upon our continued ability to compete successfully in our market area.
We operate in a highly regulated environment and we may be adversely affected by changes in laws and regulations.
We are subject to extensive regulation, supervision and examination by the Office of Thrift Supervision, our primary federal regulator, and by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, as insurer of our deposits. Such regulation and supervision governs the activities in which an institution and its holding company may engage and are intended primarily for the protection of the insurance fund and the depositors and borrowers of Naugatuck Valley Savings and Loan rather than for holders of our common stock. Regulatory authorities have extensive discretion in their supervisory and enforcement activities, including the imposition of restrictions on our operations, the classification of our assets and determination of the level of our allowance for loan losses. Any change in such regulation and oversight, whether in the form of regulatory policy, regulations, legislation or supervisory action, may have a material impact on our operations.
Naugatuck Valley Mutual’s majority control of our common stock enables it to exercise voting control over most matters put to a vote of stockholders, including preventing sale or merger transactions you may be in favor of or a second-step conversion by Naugatuck Valley Mutual.
Naugatuck Valley Mutual owns a majority of our common stock and, through its Board of Directors, is able to exercise voting control over most matters put to a vote of stockholders. The same directors and officers manage Naugatuck Valley Financial, Naugatuck Valley Savings and Naugatuck Valley Mutual. As a federally chartered mutual holding company, the Board of Directors of Naugatuck Valley Mutual must ensure that the interests of depositors of Naugatuck Valley Savings are represented and considered in matters put to a vote of stockholders of Naugatuck Valley Financial. Therefore, the votes cast by Naugatuck Valley Mutual may not be in your personal best interests as a stockholder. For example, Naugatuck Valley Mutual may exercise its voting control to defeat a stockholder nominee for election to the board of directors of Naugatuck Valley Financial. In addition, stockholders will not be able to force a merger or second-step conversion transaction without the consent of Naugatuck Valley Mutual. Some stockholders may desire a sale or merger transaction, since stockholders typically receive a premium for their shares, or a second-step conversion transaction, since fully converted institutions tend to trade at higher multiples than mutual holding companies.
Office of Thrift Supervision policy on remutualization transactions could prohibit the merger or an acquisition of us, which may lower our stock price.
Current Office of Thrift Supervision regulations permit a mutual holding company to be acquired by a mutual institution in a remutualization transaction. However, the Office of Thrift Supervision has issued a policy statement indicating that it views remutualization transactions as raising significant issues concerning disparate treatment of minority stockholders and mutual members of the target entity and as raising issues concerning the effect on the mutual members of the acquiring entity. Under certain circumstances, the Office of Thrift Supervision intends to give these issues special scrutiny and reject applications for the remutualization of a mutual holding company unless the applicant can clearly demonstrate that the Office of Thrift Supervision’s concerns are not warranted in the particular case. Should the Office of Thrift Supervision prohibit or otherwise restrict these transactions in the future, our stock price may be adversely affected. We have no current plans to undertake a remutualization transaction.
We own stock in the Federal Home Loan Bank of Boston, which recently had to suspend its dividend as a result of its financial difficulties.
As a member bank, Naugatuck Valley Savings and Loan is required to purchase capital stock in the Federal Home Loan Bank in an amount commensurate with the amount of Naugatuck Valley Savings and Loan’s advances and unused borrowing capacity. This stock is carried at cost and was $6.3 million at December 31, 2010. In response to unprecedented market conditions and potential future losses, the Federal Home Loan Bank announced in February 2009 an initiative to preserve capital by the adoption of a revised retained earnings target, declaration of a moratorium on excess stock repurchases and the suspension of cash dividend payments. If the Federal Home Loan Bank is unable to meet minimum regulatory capital requirements or is required to aid the remaining Federal Home Loan Banks, our holding of Federal Home Loan Bank stock may be determined to be other-than-temporarily impaired and may require a charge to earnings. Additionally, for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, Naugatuck Valley Financial did not recognize any dividend income from its investment in Federal Home Loan Bank stock. In February 2011, the Federal Home Loan Bank of Boston re-instituted its dividend, but at a substantially lower rate (0.30% annual yield) than the pre-suspension rate (2.50% annual yield). The failure to recognize dividend income from the Federal Home Loan Bank, or to recognize dividend income at levels significantly below historical levels, will negatively impact our net interest income.
19
Table of Contents
| ITEM 1B. | UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS. |
None.
20
Table of Contents
| ITEM 2. | PROPERTIES. |
We conduct our business through our main office and branch offices. The following table sets forth certain information relating to these facilities as of December 31, 2010.
| Location |
Year Opened/ Acquired |
Net Book Value at December 31, 2010 |
Square Footage |
Owned/ Leased |
Date of Lease Expiration |
|||||||||||||||
| (Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Main Office: |
||||||||||||||||||||
| 333 Church Street Naugatuck, CT 06770 |
1996 | $ | 2,389 | 23,000 | Owned | — | ||||||||||||||
| Branches: |
||||||||||||||||||||
| 1009 New Haven Road Naugatuck, CT 06770 |
2001 | 1,179 | 3,300 | Owned | — | |||||||||||||||
| 127 South Main Street Beacon Falls, CT 06403 |
1997 | 261 | 960 | Owned | — | |||||||||||||||
| 49 Pershing Drive Derby, CT 06418 |
2003 | 65 | 1,950 | Leased | 2013 | (1) | ||||||||||||||
| 249 West Street (2) Seymour, CT 06483 |
2002 | 2,323 | 9,500 | Owned | — | |||||||||||||||
| 504 Bridgeport Avenue Shelton, CT 06484 |
2004 | 393 | 3,000 | Leased | 2020 | (3) | ||||||||||||||
| 1699 Highland Avenue, Cheshire, CT 06410 |
2006 | 18 | 3,000 | Leased | 2016 | (4) | ||||||||||||||
| 450 Heritage Road, Suite 3C Southbury, CT 06488 |
2008 | 75 | 3,000 | Leased | 2018 | (5) | ||||||||||||||
| 1570 Southford Road (6) Southbury, CT 06488 |
2006 | 1,709 | 4,823 | Owned | — | |||||||||||||||
| 1030 Hamilton Avenue Waterbury, CT 06706 |
2006 | 3 | 1,239 | Leased | 2011 | (7) | ||||||||||||||
| Other Properties: |
||||||||||||||||||||
| 1007 New Haven Road Naugatuck, CT 06770 |
1974 | 96 | 1,725 | Leased | 2014 | (8) | ||||||||||||||
| 135 South Main Street (9) Beacon Falls, CT 06403 |
2003 | 159 | N/A | Owned | — | |||||||||||||||
| (1) | We have an option to renew this lease for three additional five-year periods. |
| (2) | This branch occupies 3,500 square feet of this building and 1,465 square feet is utilized as a training facility for Naugatuck Valley Savings and Loan. The building also includes 4,535 square feet of rentable space which is currently leased until 2013. The tenant has an option to renew this lease for three additional five year periods. |
| (3) | We have an option to renew this lease for five additional five-year periods. |
| (4) | We have an option to renew this lease for two additional five-year periods. |
| (5) | We have an option to renew this lease for two additional five-year periods. |
| (6) | This branch occupies 3,383 square feet of this building. The building also includes 1,440 square feet of space that is currently in the process of being converted into office space to house our expanding secondary market operations. |
| (7) | We have an option to renew this lease for four additional five-year periods. |
| (8) | Former branch site. We have an option to renew this lease for two additional ten-year periods. This property has been sublet under a sublease that expires in 2015. |
| (9) | This property is designated for future parking, additional access and possible future expansions of our Beacon Falls branch. |
21
Table of Contents
| ITEM 3. | LEGAL PROCEEDINGS. |
Periodically, there have been various claims and lawsuits against us, such as claims to enforce liens, condemnation proceedings on properties in which we hold security interests, claims involving the making and servicing of real property loans and other issues incident to our business. We are not a party to any pending legal proceedings that we believe would have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.
| ITEM 4. | (REMOVED AND RESERVED). |
PART II
| ITEM 5. | MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES. |
Naugatuck Valley Financial’s common stock is listed on the Nasdaq Global Market under the trading symbol “NVSL.” The following table sets forth the high and low sales prices of the common stock, as reported on the Nasdaq Global Market, and the dividend declared by Naugatuck Valley Financial during each quarter of 2009 and 2010.
| High | Low | Dividends | ||||||||||
| Year Ending December 31, 2010: |
||||||||||||
| Fourth Quarter |
$ | 6.75 | $ | 4.70 | $ | 0.03 | ||||||
| Third Quarter |
6.75 | 5.00 | 0.03 | |||||||||
| Second Quarter |
7.10 | 5.51 | 0.03 | |||||||||
| First Quarter |
7.00 | 5.28 | 0.03 | |||||||||
| Year Ended December 31, 2009: |
||||||||||||
| Fourth Quarter |
$ | 7.42 | $ | 4.14 | $ | 0.03 | ||||||
| Third Quarter |
6.30 | 4.11 | 0.03 | |||||||||
| Second Quarter |
7.24 | 5.10 | 0.03 | |||||||||
| First Quarter |
7.71 | 4.37 | 0.05 | |||||||||
At March 11, 2011, there were 766 holders of record of Naugatuck Valley Financial common stock.
Naugatuck Valley Financial’s ability to pay dividends is dependent on dividends received from Naugatuck Valley Savings. For a discussion of restrictions on the payment of cash dividends by Naugatuck Valley Savings, see “Business—Regulation and Supervision—Regulation of Federal Savings Institutions—Limitation on Capital Distributions” in this Annual Report on Form 10-K and note 14 to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
The following table presents information regarding Naugatuck Valley Financial stock repurchases during the three months ended December 31, 2010.
| Period |
Total
Number of Shares Purchased |
Average Price Paid per Share |
Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs |
Maximum Number of Shares that May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs |
||||||||||||
| October |
— | — | — | 159,676 | ||||||||||||
| November |
— | — | — | 159,676 | ||||||||||||
| December |
— | — | — | 159,676 | ||||||||||||
| Total |
— | — | — | 159,676 | ||||||||||||
On February 19, 2008, the Company announced that the Board of Directors authorized the Company to repurchase up to 361,207 shares, or approximately 5%, of the outstanding shares of common stock, including the shares held by Naugatuck Valley Mutual Holding Company. The repurchases will be conducted through open-market purchases or privately negotiated transactions and will be made from time to time depending on market conditions and other factors. No time limit was placed on the duration of the share repurchase program. Any repurchased shares will be held as treasury stock and will be available for general corporate purposes. The number of shares remaining to be purchased under the plan in the table above does not reflect the number of shares authorized in this repurchase plan.
22
Table of Contents
| ITEM 6. | SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA. |
The summary financial information presented below is derived in part from our consolidated financial statements. The following is only a summary and you should read it in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes beginning on page F-1. The information at December 31, 2010 and 2009 and for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008 is derived in part from the audited consolidated financial statements that appear in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. The information at December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006 and for the years ending December 31, 2007 and 2006 are derived in part from our audited consolidated financial statements that do not appear in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. The information presented below does not include the financial condition, results of operations or other data of Naugatuck Valley Mutual Holding Company. For a discussion of the reason for material changes in the financial condition and results of operations at and for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, see “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.”
| At December 31, | ||||||||||||||||||||
| (In thousands) |
2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | |||||||||||||||
| Selected Financial Condition Data: |
||||||||||||||||||||
| Total assets |
$ | 568,253 | $ | 556,955 | $ | 535,386 | $ | 462,527 | $ | 413,855 | ||||||||||
| Securities held-to-maturity |
15,334 | 1,451 | — | 1,190 | 2,531 | |||||||||||||||
| Securities available-for-sale |
31,683 | 37,623 | 63,844 | 65,264 | 67,736 | |||||||||||||||
| Loans receivable, net |
473,521 | 473,304 | 431,976 | 359,831 | 308,376 | |||||||||||||||
| Cash and cash equivalents |
14,263 | 12,146 | 8,247 | 8,370 | 7,942 | |||||||||||||||
| Deposits |
405,875 | 380,931 | 363,026 | 321,398 | 289,198 | |||||||||||||||
| Borrowed funds |
102,842 | 118,984 | 119,148 | 85,107 | 68,488 | |||||||||||||||
| Total stockholders’ equity |
52,260 | 50,308 | 45,589 | 50,457 | 51,084 | |||||||||||||||
| Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||||||||||
| (In thousands, except per share data) |
2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | |||||||||||||||
| Selected Operating Data: |
||||||||||||||||||||
| Interest and dividend income |
$ | 28,538 | $ | 28,291 | $ | 28,203 | $ | 25,030 | $ | 20,750 | ||||||||||
| Interest expense |
10,279 | 12,537 | 13,904 | 13,174 | 9,350 | |||||||||||||||
| Net interest income |
18,259 | 15,754 | 14,299 | 11,856 | 11,400 | |||||||||||||||
| Provision for loan losses |
3,360 | 1,144 | 675 | 151 | 192 | |||||||||||||||
| Net interest income after provision for loan losses |
14,899 | 14,610 | 13,624 | 11,705 | 11,208 | |||||||||||||||
| Noninterest income (loss) |
3,288 | 2,742 | (1,048 | ) | 2,354 | 1,948 | ||||||||||||||
| Noninterest expense |
15,907 | 14,541 | 13,454 | 12,422 | 11,504 | |||||||||||||||
| Income (loss) before tax provision (benefit) |
2,280 | 2,811 | (878 | ) | 1,637 | 1,652 | ||||||||||||||
| Income tax provision (benefit) |
829 | 818 | (566 | ) | 217 | 204 | ||||||||||||||
| Net income (loss) |
$ | 1,451 | $ | 1,993 | $ | (312 | ) | $ | 1,420 | $ | 1,448 | |||||||||
| Earnings (loss) per share, basic and diluted |
$ | 0.21 | $ | 0.29 | $ | (0.05 | ) | $ | 0.20 | $ | 0.20 | |||||||||
23
Table of Contents
| At or For the Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | ||||||||||||||||
| Performance Ratios: |
||||||||||||||||||||
| Return (loss) on average assets |
0.25 | % | 0.37 | % | (0.06 | )% | 0.33 | % | 0.38 | % | ||||||||||
| Return (loss) on average equity |
2.79 | 4.10 | (0.64 | ) | 2.77 | 2.79 | ||||||||||||||
| Interest rate spread (1) |
3.40 | 3.00 | 2.88 | 2.76 | 3.07 | |||||||||||||||
| Net interest margin (2) |
3.45 | 3.09 | 3.02 | 2.95 | 3.26 | |||||||||||||||
| Noninterest expense to average assets |
2.79 | 2.68 | 2.66 | 2.86 | 3.03 | |||||||||||||||
| Efficiency ratio (3) |
73.67 | 78.43 | 101.28 | 87.18 | 85.93 | |||||||||||||||
| Dividend payout ratio (4) |
23.48 | 24.25 | N/M | 45.10 | 46.51 | |||||||||||||||
| Average interest-earning assets to average interest-bearing liabilities |
102.65 | 103.77 | 104.46 | 105.65 | 107.18 | |||||||||||||||
| Average equity to average assets |
9.13 | 8.97 | 9.71 | 11.80 | 13.65 | |||||||||||||||
| Capital Ratios: |
||||||||||||||||||||
| Total capital to risk-weighted assets |
11.84 | % | 11.10 | % | 11.09 | % | 12.88 | % | 14.29 | % | ||||||||||
| Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets |
10.59 | 10.16 | 10.36 | 12.22 | 13.56 | |||||||||||||||
| Tier 1 capital to adjusted total assets |
8.03 | 7.76 | 7.58 | 8.81 | 9.53 | |||||||||||||||
| Total equity to total assets |
9.20 | 9.03 | 8.52 | 10.91 | 12.34 | |||||||||||||||
| Asset Quality Ratios: |
||||||||||||||||||||
| Allowance for loan losses as a percent of total loans |
1.33 | % | 0.84 | % | 0.66 | % | 0.60 | % | 0.67 | % | ||||||||||
| Allowance for loan losses as a percent of nonperforming loans |
35.74 | 66.60 | 107.13 | 222.99 | 103.03 | |||||||||||||||
| Net charge-offs (recoveries) to average loans outstanding during the period |
0.20 | — | (0.01 | ) | 0.02 | — | ||||||||||||||
| Nonperforming loans as a percent of total loans |
3.73 | 1.26 | 0.62 | 0.27 | 0.65 | |||||||||||||||
| Nonperforming assets as a percent of total assets |
3.22 | 1.10 | 0.50 | 0.21 | 0.49 | |||||||||||||||
| Other Data: |
||||||||||||||||||||
| Number of: |
||||||||||||||||||||
| Deposit accounts |
31,167 | 30,712 | 30,721 | 29,489 | 27,385 | |||||||||||||||
| Full service customer service facilities |
10 | 10 | 10 | 9 | 9 | |||||||||||||||
| (1) | Represents the difference between the weighted average yield on average interest-earning assets and the weighted average cost of interest-bearing liabilities. |
| (2) | Represents net interest income as a percent of average interest-earning assets. |
| (3) | Represents noninterest expense (less intangible amortization) divided by the sum of net interest income and noninterest income. |
| (4) | Represents dividends declared (excluding waived dividends) divided by net income. The ratio is not meaningful for the 2008 period due to the net loss for the year. A summary of the dividends declared and paid by Naugatuck Valley Financial and dividends waived by Naugatuck Valley Mutual Holding Company is set forth below: |
24
Table of Contents
| For the Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||||||||||
| (In thousands) |
2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | |||||||||||||||
| Dividends: |
||||||||||||||||||||
| Paid to minority shareholders |
$ | 341 | $ | 483 | $ | 668 | $ | 640 | $ | 673 | ||||||||||
| Waived by Naugatuck Valley Mutual Holding Company |
502 | 711 | 962 | 836 | 836 | |||||||||||||||
| Total dividend |
$ | 843 | $ | 1,194 | $ | 1,630 | $ | 1,476 | $ | 1,509 | ||||||||||
| ITEM 7. | MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATION |
Overview
Income. We have two primary sources of income. The first is net interest income, which is the difference between interest income, the income that we earn on our loans and investments, and interest expense, the interest that we pay on our deposits and borrowings.
To a lesser extent, we also recognize income from fees and service charges, which is the compensation we receive from providing products and services. Our primary noninterest income comes from fees and service charges on loan and deposit accounts. We also earn income from bank owned life insurance, sales of loans and investments and investment advisory services.
Expenses. The expenses we incur in operating our business consist of compensation, taxes and benefits, office occupancy, computer processing fees, advertising and professional fees and other expenses.
Compensation, taxes and benefits consist primarily of the salaries and wages paid to our employees and directors, payroll taxes and expenses for retirement and other employee benefits.
Occupancy expenses, which are the fixed and variable costs of buildings and equipment, consist primarily of lease payments, real estate taxes, depreciation charges, maintenance, and costs of utilities.
Computer processing fees includes fees paid to our third-party data processing servicer and our network security expenses.
Professional fees include fees paid for our attorneys, accountants and consultants.
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation assessments are a specified percentage of assessable deposits, depending on the risk characteristics of the institution. Due to losses incurred by the Deposit Insurance Fund in 2008 from failed institutions, and anticipated future losses, in 2009 the FDIC increased its assessment rates and charged a special assessment to increase the balance of the insurance fund.
Other expenses include expenses for insurance, postage, expenses associated with being a public company, expenses related to checking accounts, supervisory examinations and other miscellaneous operating activities.
Our Business Strategy
The following are the key elements of our business strategy:
| • | Maintaining capital at “well capitalized” levels. Our policy has always been to protect the safety and soundness of Naugatuck Valley Savings and Loan through conservative credit and operational risk management, balance sheet strength, and safe and sound operations. As a result, our capital ratios are in excess of the “well capitalized” standards set by the Office of Thrift Supervision. Although our asset size has grown significantly since our initial public offering in 2004 we have maintained “well capitalized” levels of regulatory capital through additions to capital from profits as well as through an effective dividend policy that balances capital adequacy with shareholder returns. |
| • | Improvement of asset quality. Although we have sought to maintain our asset quality at high levels by applying what we consider to be conservative underwriting standards, our non-performing assets increased from $2.7 million, or 0.5% of total assets, at December 31, 2008 to $6.1 million, or 1.1% of total assets, as of December 31, 2009 to $18.3 million, or 3.22 % of total assets, at December 31, 2010. This increase was due to the effects of weakened economic conditions on our borrowers. |
25
Table of Contents
Management works closely with the asset quality committee of the board of directors to resolve nonperforming assets in a manner most advantageous to Naugatuck Valley Financial. To address increased problem assets, we have placed more attention and resources on loan workouts and, in certain cases, have modified loans with delinquent borrowers. Loan workouts and modifications are handled either by the collections department (in the case of home mortgages or home equity loans) or by the commercial workout department (in the case of commercial loans). Delinquent or otherwise nonperforming mortgage loan and home equity loan customers are asked to provide updated financial information and the reasons for their inability to pay or comply with the contractual terms of the loans. Once we have received this information, we obtain updated credit reports, appraisals and title searches. We then develop and pursue a workout strategy. One of our loan officers who has significant loan workout experience has been given primary responsibility for problem commercial loan workouts, although the specific modifications are handled by individual officers or by a commercial loan workout officer. We attribute our low level of net-charge-offs to these workout efforts. Net charge-offs were 0.20% of average loans outstanding for the year ended December 31, 2010.
We have tightened underwriting standards by applying more stringent loan-to-value ratio requirements and debt- service coverage ratio requirements. In May 2010 we increased minimum debt-service coverage ratios on owner occupied commercial real estate loans from 1.20x to 1.25x, on non-owner occupied commercial real estate loans from 1.20x to 1.35x and on commercial business lines and loans from 1.20x to 1.35x. In addition, at that time we decreased minimum loan-to-value ratio requirements for owner occupied commercial real estate loans from 80% to 75% and for non-owner occupied commercial real estate loans from 75% to 70%. Furthermore, we are contacting delinquent borrowers earlier on in the delinquency stage in order to increase the probability of successful workout efforts.
In addition, since May 2010 we have been limiting the number of new loans granted to non-customers. We also currently do not consider new loan participations with other financial institutions.
Finally, we annually engage an outside loan review firm to perform a thorough review of our loan portfolio. This review involves analyzing all large borrowing relationships, delinquency trends, and loan collateral valuation in order to identify impaired loans.
| • | Expanding secondary mortgage market capabilities. During 2009, we began to pursue a significant initiative to develop a secondary mortgage operation. We invested in personnel and systems to increase our ability to sell residential mortgages in the secondary market with the goals of increasing fee income and reducing interest rate risk through the sale of conforming long-term fixed-rate residential mortgages. With our systems in place, we have recently hired experienced loan production professionals in order to increase production. Since implementing this initiative, a significant percentage of all one-to four-family residential conforming loans we originate have been sold in the secondary market on a servicing retained basis. Such loans are primarily sold to Freddie Mac. To date, all loans sold have been without recourse. We utilize the proceeds from these sales primarily to meet liquidity needs. The volume of loans sold totaled $37.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2010. We intend to continue to originate loans for sale in the secondary market to grow our servicing portfolio and generate additional noninterest income. |
| • | Maintaining multiple sources of liquidity and focusing on core deposits. During the current period of slow economic growth we recognize the importance of maintaining multiple sources of liquidity. Our primary source of liquidity is local deposits for which we compete aggressively with competitive rates and superior levels of customer service. We also utilize borrowings from both the Federal Home Loan Bank of Boston and our correspondent bank and we are in process of establishing a liquidity line with the Federal Reserve. In addition, we occasionally sell investments to meet liquidity needs. We also have the ability to sell a portion of our residential mortgage portfolio in the secondary market to meet liquidity needs. Our portfolio of fixed-rate residential mortgage loans provides predictable cash flows and is a consistent source of liquidity. Furthermore, we intend to continue to focus on building our deposit base with lower cost core deposits, which we define as all deposits other than “jumbo” certificates of deposit (those with principal balances over $100,000). At December 31, 2010, we had approximately $50.0 million of above market, promotional rate certificates of deposit scheduled to mature between May 1, 2011 and August 31, 2011. These promotions were offered in all of our offices in conjunction with the opening of our Heritage Village branch office. Based upon historical experience, we expect that a substantial portion of these funds will either be rolled into new lower rate certificates of deposit or deposited into money market and other short term deposits. We expect that this will decrease our funding costs. |
| • | Improving our efficiency ratio. We monitor our efficiency ratio closely and strive to improve it through expense control and increases in noninterest income and in net interest income. For the year ended December 31, 2010, our efficiency ratio was 73.67%, as compared to 78.43% for the year ended December 31, 2009. Our largest non-interest expense is compensation. We work to limit growth of compensation expense by controlling increases in the number of employees to |
26
Table of Contents
| those needed to support our operations and by maximizing the use of technology to increase efficiency. We work to increase non-interest income by charging competitive fees for services related to deposit and loan accounts as well as by earning yield spread premiums on the sale of residential mortgage production in the secondary market. Our wealth management unit also contributes to our noninterest income. We work to increase our net interest income by optimizing loan pricing and though the growth of low cost core deposits. |
| • | Maintaining a well diversified loan portfolio. Our strategy has been to develop a well-diversified loan portfolio. At December 31, 2006, approximately 28.6% of our loan portfolio were commercial loans, consisting primarily of multi-family and commercial real estate, commercial business and construction loans, and 71.4% were retail loans consisting of residential mortgage, home equity loans and lines of credit and other consumer loans. At December 31, 2010, 46.9% of our loan portfolio were commercial loans, while approximately 53.1% were retail loans. This growth has led to a significant concentration of commercial loans in our loan portfolio, with commercial loans constituting 444.3% of Naugatuck Valley Savings and Loan’s risked-based capital at December 31, 2010. |
Although commercial loans have a higher risk of default and loss than owner-occupied single-family residential mortgage loans, commercial loans also tend to have higher yields which provide us with the opportunity for increased income. Commercial loans also have shorter terms to maturity or adjustable interest rates which is beneficial for interest rate risk management. Our efforts to diversify our loan portfolio has produced what we believe to be a diversified loan mix that balances credit risk, interest rate risk and earnings potential. At December 31, 2010, our construction loan portfolio, commercial real estate and multi-family loan portfolio, and commercial business loan portfolio amounted to 60.8%, 315.2% and 68.3% of Naugatuck Valley Savings and Loans’ risked-based capital at that date, respectively. We intend to control our commercial loan growth in order to maintain these percentages at approximately the same levels. See also “Risk Factors—Risks Related to Our Business—Our portfolio of loans with a higher risk of loss have increased recently and may increase further as a result of our continued origination of commercial loans,” and “—Risks Related to Our Business—Our strategy of controlling commercial loan growth may have a negative effect on our earnings.”
| • | Managing interest rate risk. We seek to maintain manageable levels of interest rate risk by originating for portfolio adjustable rate commercial loans, by building core deposits which are less susceptible to interest rate changes and by borrowing long-term from the Federal Home Loan Bank of Boston in the prevailing low interest rate environment. We maintain “moderate” interest rate sensitivity as modeled by the Office of Thrift Supervision. In addition, we utilize the services of an independent third party to model our interest rate risk on a quarterly basis. |
| • | Expanding our franchise and geographical footprint through acquisition opportunities and the opening of additional branch offices. In 2000, our branch network consisted of three locations. During the past ten years we have expanded our franchise by opening seven de novo branches so that we now operate ten full service branch locations in the greater Naugatuck Valley area. Although we currently do not have any specific plans for acquisitions or to open additional branch offices, we intend to continue to pursue such opportunities to expand our franchise and footprint in future years. |
| • | Growing our business within our current market area. Our officers, employees and directors work as a team to help grow our business by providing superior customer service and offering personalized banking services at competitive prices. Recently, we have appointed Ambassadors at each of our branch offices. Ambassadors are influential members of the communities we serve. Our branch office staff is committed to working with their Ambassadors to build upon existing customer relationships and to attract new ones. |
Critical Accounting Policies
We consider accounting policies involving significant judgments and assumptions by management that have, or could have, a material impact on the carrying value of certain assets or on income to be critical accounting policies. We consider the following to be critical accounting policies: allowance for loan losses, deferred income taxes and fair value of financial instruments.
Allowance for Loan Losses. Determining the amount of the allowance for loan losses necessarily involves a high degree of judgment. Management reviews the level of the allowance on a quarterly basis, at a minimum, and establishes the provision for loan losses based on the composition of the loan portfolio, delinquency levels, loss experience, economic conditions, and other factors related to the collectability of the loan portfolio.
Although we believe that we use the best information available to establish the allowance for loan losses, future additions to the allowance may be necessary based on estimates that are susceptible to change as a result of changes in economic conditions and other factors. We engage an independent review of our commercial loan portfolio annually and adjust our loan ratings based in part upon this review. In addition, our banking regulator as an integral part of its examination process, periodically reviews our allowance
27
Table of Contents
for loan losses. Such agency may require us to recognize adjustments to the allowance based on its judgments about information available to it at the time of its examination. See notes 3 and 5 of the notes to the Naugatuck Valley Financial financial statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Deferred Income Taxes. We use the asset and liability method of accounting for income taxes. Under this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. If current available information raises doubt as to the realization of the deferred tax assets, a valuation allowance is established. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. We exercise significant judgment in evaluating the amount and timing of recognition of the resulting tax liabilities and assets, including projections of future taxable income. These judgments and estimates are reviewed periodically as regulatory and business factors change. See notes 3 and 12 of the notes to the financial statements in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments. We use fair value measurements to record certain assets at fair value on a recurring basis, primarily related to the carrying amounts for available-for-sale investment securities. Additionally, we may be required to record at fair value other assets, such as foreclosed real estate, on a nonrecurring basis. These nonrecurring fair value adjustments typically involve the application of lower-of-cost-or market value accounting or write-down of individual assets. Valuation techniques based on unobservable inputs are highly subjective and require judgments regarding significant matters such as the amount and timing of future cash flows and the selection of discount rates that may appropriately reflect market and credit risks. Changes in these judgments often have a material impact on the fair value estimates. In addition, since these estimates are as of a specific point in time, they are susceptible to material near-term changes. The fair values disclosed do not reflect any premium or discount that could result from the sale of a large volume of a particular financial instrument, nor do they reflect the possible tax ramifications or estimated transaction costs. See notes 3, 4 and 17 of the notes to the Naugatuck Valley Financial financial statements in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Balance Sheet
Loans. Our principal lending activity is the origination of loans secured by real estate primarily located in our market area. We originate real estate loans, secured by one- to four-family residential homes and multi-family and commercial real estate, and construction loans. At December 31, 2010, real estate loans totaled $410.4 million, or 85.3% of total loans, compared to $410.9 million, or 85.4% of total loans, at December 31, 2009. Real estate loans remained stable reflecting growth in our multi-family and commercial real estate portfolio offset by our selling of one-to four-family fixed-rate mortgages in the secondary market.
The largest segment of our real estate loan portfolio is one- to four-family residential loans. At December 31, 2010, these loans totaled $219.3 million and represented 53.4% of real estate loans and 45.6% of total loans, compared to $229.7 million, which represented 55.9% of real estate loans and 47.7% of total loans, at December 31, 2009. One- to four-family residential loans decreased $10.4 million, or 4.5% from December 31, 2009 to December 31, 2010. The decrease in the 2010 period reflects the effects of selling one- to four-family fixed-rate mortgages in the secondary market.
Multi-family and commercial real estate loans are the second largest segment of our real estate loan portfolio. These loans were $160.2 million, which represented 39.0% of real estate loans and 33.3% of total loans, at December 31, 2010 compared to $134.9 million, which represented 32.8% of real estate loans and 28.0% of total loans, at December 31, 2009. Multi-family and commercial real estate loans increased due to the efforts of our business development officers to grow market share and attract new business.
We also originate construction loans secured by residential and commercial real estate. These loans were $30.9 million and represented 7.5% of real estate loans and 6.4% of total loans at December 31, 2010 compared to $46.3 million, which represented 11.3% of real estate loans and 9.6% of total loans, at December 31, 2009. Construction loans decreased primarily due to decreased loan demand by contractors for construction loans, combined with a portion of these loans converting to permanent loans at the end of the construction period.
We originate commercial business loans secured by business assets other than real estate, such as business equipment, inventory and accounts receivable and letters of credit. Commercial business loans totaled $34.7 million, or 7.2% of total loans, at December 31, 2010, compared to $31.3 million, or 6.5% of total loans, at December 31, 2009.
We also originate a variety of consumer loans, including second mortgage loans, home equity lines of credit and loans secured by savings accounts and automobiles. Consumer loans totaled $36.2 million, or 7.5% of total loans, at December 31, 2010, compared to $38.9 million, or 8.1% of total loans, at December 31, 2009.
The following table sets forth the composition of our loan portfolio at the dates indicated.
28
Table of Contents
| At December 31, | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| (Dollars in thousands) |
Amount | Percent | Amount | Percent | Amount | Percent | ||||||||||||||||||
| Real estate loans: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
| One-to four-family |
$ | 219,286 | 45.56 | % | $ | 229,693 | 47.74 | % | $ | 216,201 | 49.51 | % | ||||||||||||
| Construction |
30,921 | 6.42 | 46,298 | 9.62 | 50,596 | 11.59 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Multi-family and commercial real estate |
160,235 | 33.29 | 134,931 | 28.05 | 106,028 | 24.28 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Total real estate loans |
410,442 | 85.27 | 410,922 | 85.41 | 372,825 | 85.38 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Commercial business loans |
34,742 | 7.22 | 31,325 | 6.51 | 22,567 | 5.17 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Consumer loans: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Home equity |
34,807 | 7.23 | 37,276 | 7.75 | 39,655 | 9.08 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Savings accounts |
956 | 0.20 | 1,113 | 0.23 | 1,093 | 0.25 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Personal |
236 | 0.05 | 256 | 0.05 | 262 | 0.06 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Automobile |
168 | 0.03 | 230 | 0.05 | 271 | 0.06 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Total consumer loans |
36,167 | 7.51 | 38,875 | 8.08 | 41,281 | 9.45 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Total loans |
481,351 | 100.00 | % | 481,122 | 100.00 | % | 436,673 | 100.00 | % | |||||||||||||||
| Less: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Allowance for loan losses |
6,393 | 3,996 | 2,869 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Undisbursed construction loans |
1,034 | 3,336 | 1,299 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Deferred loan origination fees |
403 | 486 | 529 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Loans receivable, net |
$ | 473,521 | $ | 473,304 | $ | 431,976 | ||||||||||||||||||
29
Table of Contents
| At December 31, | ||||||||||||||||
| 2007 | 2006 | |||||||||||||||
| (Dollars in thousands) |
Amount | Percent | Amount | Percent | ||||||||||||
| Real estate loans: |
||||||||||||||||
| One-to four-family |
$ | 193,787 | 53.24 | % | $ | 179,374 | 57.27 | % | ||||||||
| Construction |
41,041 | 11.27 | 30,124 | 9.62 | ||||||||||||
| Multi-family and commercial real estate |
70,051 | 19.25 | 45,879 | 14.65 | ||||||||||||
| Total real estate loans |
304,879 | 83.76 | 255,377 | 81.54 | ||||||||||||
| Commercial business loans |
16,690 | 4.59 | 13,508 | 4.31 | ||||||||||||
| Consumer loans: |
||||||||||||||||
| Home equity |
40,517 | 11.13 | 43,220 | 13.80 | ||||||||||||
| Savings accounts |
1,272 | 0.35 | 634 | 0.20 | ||||||||||||
| Personal |
302 | 0.08 | 275 | 0.09 | ||||||||||||
| Automobile |
327 | 0.09 | 186 | 0.06 | ||||||||||||
| Total consumer loans |
42,418 | 11.65 | 44,315 | 14.15 | ||||||||||||
| Total loans |
363,987 | 100.00 | % | 313,200 | 100.00 | % | ||||||||||
| Less: |
||||||||||||||||
| Allowance for loan losses |
2,163 | 2,071 | ||||||||||||||
| Undisbursed construction loans |
1,532 | 2,343 | ||||||||||||||
| Deferred loan origination fees |
461 | 410 | ||||||||||||||
| Loans receivable, net |
$ | 359,831 | $ | 308,376 | ||||||||||||
The following table sets forth certain information at December 31, 2010 regarding the dollar amount of loans repricing or maturing during the periods indicated. The table does not include any estimate of prepayments which significantly shorten the average life of all loans and may cause our actual repayment experience to differ from that shown below. Demand loans having no stated maturity are reported as due in one year or less.
| At December 31, 2010 | ||||||||||||||||
| (In thousands) |
Real Estate Loans |
Commercial Business Loans |
Consumer Loans |
Total Loans | ||||||||||||
| One year or less |
$ | 53,611 | $ | 22,702 | $ | 22,916 | $ | 99,229 | ||||||||
| More than one year to five years |
113,592 | 6,320 | 3,631 | 123,543 | ||||||||||||
| More than five years |
243,239 | 5,720 | 9,620 | 258,579 | ||||||||||||
| Total |
$ | 410,442 | $ | 34,742 | $ | 36,167 | $ | 481,351 | ||||||||
30
Table of Contents
The following table sets forth the dollar amount of all loans at December 31, 2010 that are due after December 31, 2011, and have either fixed interest rates or floating or adjustable interest rates. The amounts shown below exclude applicable loans in process, nonperforming loans and deferred loan fees, net.
| At December 31, 2010 and Due After December 31, 2011 |
||||||||||||
| (In thousands) |
Fixed-Rates | Floating or Adjustable- Rates |
Total | |||||||||
| Real estate loans: |
||||||||||||
| One- to four-family |
$ | 204,820 | $ | 7,826 | $ | 212,646 | ||||||
| Construction |
2,779 | — | 2,779 | |||||||||
| Multi-family and commercial |
9,995 | 131,412 | 141,407 | |||||||||
| Commercial business loans |
7,818 | 4,221 | 12,039 | |||||||||
| Consumer loans |
13,145 | 106 | 13,251 | |||||||||
| Total |
$ | 238,557 | $ | 143,565 | $ | 382,122 | ||||||
The following table shows loan origination activity during the periods indicated.
| Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
| (In thousands) |
2010 | 2009 | 2008 | |||||||||
| Total loans at beginning of period |
$ | 481,122 | $ | 436,673 | $ | 363,987 | ||||||
| Loans originated: |
||||||||||||
| Real estate loans: |
||||||||||||
| One- to four-family |
67,131 | 48,387 | 41,472 | |||||||||
| Construction |
11,483 | 24,518 | 34,459 | |||||||||
| Multi-family and commercial |
29,362 | 24,547 | 40,566 | |||||||||
| Commercial business loans |
20,066 | 21,598 | 15,597 | |||||||||
| Consumer loans |
13,377 | 13,726 | 13,235 | |||||||||
| Total loans originated |
141,419 | 132,776 | 145,329 | |||||||||
| Deduct: |
||||||||||||
| Real estate loan principal repayments |
(71,559 | ) | (59,355 | ) | (48,551 | ) | ||||||
| Loan sales |
(36,897 | ) | — | — | ||||||||
| Other repayments |
(32,734 | ) | (28,972 | ) | (24,092 | ) | ||||||
| Net loan activity |
229 | 44,449 | 72,686 | |||||||||
| Total loans at end of period |
$ | 481,351 | $ | 481,122 | $ | 436,673 | ||||||
We did not purchase any loans during the periods presented in the table above.
Securities. Our securities portfolio consists primarily of mortgage-backed securities and collateralized mortgage obligations with maturities of 30 years or less, money market preferred obligations, as well as U.S. Government and agency obligations. Securities increased by $7.7 million in the year ended December 31, 2010 due to the purchase of additional mortgage-backed securities during this period offset by the sale of a corporate bond, the maturity of a U.S. Government obligation and principal repayments on mortgage-backed securities. Securities decreased by $24.8 million in the year ended December 31, 2009 primarily due to the sale of our entire municipal bond portfolio, combined with the sale of a portion of our mortgage-backed security portfolio.
All of our mortgage-backed securities and substantially all of our collateralized mortgage obligations were issued either by Ginnie Mae, Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac. At December 31, 2010, our securities portfolio also included a private label collateralized mortgage obligation with a par value of $436,000.
31
Table of Contents
The following table sets forth the amortized costs and fair values of our securities portfolio at the dates indicated.
| At December 31, | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| (In thousands) |
Amortized Cost |
Fair Value |
Amortized Cost |
Fair Value |
Amortized Cost |
Fair Value |
||||||||||||||||||
| Available-for-sale securities: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
| U.S. Government and agency obligations |
$ | 1,022 | $ | 1,087 | $ | 1,529 | $ | 1,583 | $ | 1,537 | $ | 1,604 | ||||||||||||
| Mortgage-backed securities |
19,093 | 19,960 | 23,561 | 24,500 | 42,297 | 43,030 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Collateralized mortgage obligations |
2,706 | 2,676 | 3,091 | 3,000 | 3,339 | 3,183 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Municipal obligations |
— | — | — | — | 8,888 | 8,993 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Money market preferred obligations |
8,200 | 7,960 | 8,200 | 7,880 | 9,273 | 6,744 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Corporate obligations |
— | — | 1,000 | 660 | 1,000 | 290 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Held-to-maturity securities: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
| US Government and agency obligations |
— | — | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||
| Mortgage-backed securities |
15,334 | 15,104 | 1,451 | 1,475 | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||
| Interest-bearing balances |
— | — | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||
| Total |
$ | 46,355 | $ | 46,787 | $ | 38,832 | $ | 39,098 | $ | 66,334 | $ | 63,844 | ||||||||||||
At December 31, 2010, we did not own any securities, other than U.S. Government and agency securities, that had an aggregate book value in excess of 10% of our total stockholders’ equity at that date.
32
Table of Contents
The following table sets forth the final maturities and weighted average yields of securities at December 31, 2010. Mortgage-backed securities and collateralized mortgage obligations are secured by mortgages and as a result produce monthly principal repayments which are not reflected in the table below. Certain mortgage-backed securities, collateralized mortgage obligations and money market preferred obligations have adjustable interest rates and reprice within the various maturity ranges. These repricing schedules are not reflected in the table below. At December 31, 2010, mortgage-backed securities and collateralized mortgage obligations with adjustable rates totaled $8.5 million. The auction markets for the money market preferred obligations listed are not currently active. As a result, the money market preferred obligations are listed below based on their repricing schedule, rather than their expected maturities.
| One Year or Less | More than One Year to Five Years |
More than Five Years to Ten Years |
||||||||||||||||||||||
| (Dollars in thousands) |
Carrying Value |
Weighted Average Yield |
Carrying Value |
Weighted Average Yield |
Carrying Value |
Weighted Average Yield |
||||||||||||||||||
| Available-for-sale securities: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
| U.S. Government and agency obligations |
$ | — | — | % | $ | 1,087 | 4.38 | % | $ | — | — | % | ||||||||||||
| Mortgage-backed securities |
— | — | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||
| Collateralized mortgage obligations |
— | — | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||
| Money market preferred obligations |
7,960 | 4.45 | 1,087 | 4.38 | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||
| Total available-for-sale securities |
7,960 | 4.45 | 1,087 | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||
| Held-to-maturity securities: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Mortgage-backed securities |
— | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||
| Total held-to-maturity securities |
— | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||
| Total |
$ | 7,960 | 4.45 | $ | 1,087 | 4.38 | $ | — | — | |||||||||||||||
| More than Ten Years |
Total | |||||||||||||||
| (Dollars in thousands) |
Carrying Value |
Weighted Average Yield |
Carrying Value |
Weighted Average Yield |
||||||||||||
| Available-for-sale securities: |
||||||||||||||||
| U.S. Government and agency obligations |
$ | — | — | % | $ | 1,087 | 4.38 | % | ||||||||
| Mortgage-backed securities |
19,960 | 4.44 | 19,960 | 4.44 | ||||||||||||
| Collateralized mortgage obligations |
2,676 | 3.89 | 2,676 | 3.89 | ||||||||||||
| Money market preferred obligations |
— | 7,960 | 4.45 | |||||||||||||
| Total available-for-sale securities |
$ | 22,636 | 4.37 | $ | 31,683 | 4.39 | ||||||||||
| Held-to-maturity securities: |
||||||||||||||||
| Mortgage-backed securities |
15,104 | 3.75 | 15,104 | 3.75 | ||||||||||||
| Total held-to-maturity securities |
15,104 | 3.75 | 15,104 | 3.75 | ||||||||||||
| Total |
$ | 37,740 | 4.12 | $ | 46,787 | 4.19 | ||||||||||
Bank Owned Life Insurance. We have purchased life insurance policies on certain key executives to help offset the costs of certain benefits provided to Naugatuck Valley Savings and Loan’s employees. Bank owned life insurance totaled $9.2 million at December 31, 2010. Bank owned life insurance is recorded as an asset at the lower of its cash surrender value or the amount that can be realized. Income earned on bank owned life insurance policies
33
Table of Contents
is exempt from income taxes. This program is monitored on an annual basis to ensure that Naugatuck Valley Savings and Loan remains within the established guidelines outlined in the bank regulatory policies. The risks that are reviewed on an ongoing basis are: liquidity risk, transaction/operational risk, tax and insurable interest implications, reputation risk, credit and interest rate risk, price risk and compliance/legal risk.
Deposits. Our primary source of funds is retail deposit accounts held principally by individuals and businesses within our market area. The deposit base is comprised of certificate accounts, regular savings accounts, checking and NOW accounts, money market savings accounts and health savings accounts. At December 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, we had no brokered deposits. Total deposits increased $24.9 million or 6.5% in the year ended December 31, 2010. During that time period, certificate accounts increased by 3.2%, regular savings accounts increased by 20.9%, checking and NOW accounts increased by 4.5% and money market accounts increased by 4.2%.
The following table sets forth the balances of our deposit products at the date indicated.
| At December 31, | ||||||||||||
| (In thousands) |
2010 | 2009 | 2008 | |||||||||
| Certificate accounts |
$ | 239,406 | $ | 231,905 | $ | 235,764 | ||||||
| Regular savings accounts |
79,682 | 65,916 | 48,427 | |||||||||
| Checking and NOW accounts |
59,914 | 57,319 | 52,537 | |||||||||
| Money market savings accounts |
26,873 | 25,791 | 26,298 | |||||||||
| Total |
$ | 405,875 | $ | 380,931 | $ | 363,026 | ||||||
The following table indicates the amount of jumbo certificate accounts by time remaining until maturity at December 31, 2010. Jumbo certificate accounts require minimum deposits of $100,000.
| Maturity Period |
Certificate Accounts |
|||
| (In thousands) | ||||
| Three months or less |
$ | 11,038 | ||
| Over three through six months |
15,514 | |||
| Over six through twelve months |
36,052 | |||
| Over twelve months |
30,149 | |||
| Total |
$ | 92,753 | ||
The following table sets forth the time deposits classified by rates at the dates indicated.
| At December 31, | ||||||||||||
| (In thousands) |
2010 | 2009 | 2008 | |||||||||
| 0.00 – 0.99% |
$ | 55,958 | $ | 40,634 | $ | 302 | ||||||
| 1.00 – 1.99% |
58,786 | 52,467 | 23,824 | |||||||||
| 2.00 – 2.99% |
15,366 | 13,623 | 42,991 | |||||||||
| 3.00 – 3.99% |
31,522 | 43,968 | 85,314 | |||||||||
| 4.00 – 4.99% |
76,524 | 78,787 | 78,579 | |||||||||
| 5.00 – 5.99% |
1,250 | 2,426 | 4,754 | |||||||||
| Total |
$ | 239,406 | $ | 231,905 | $ | 235,764 | ||||||
34
Table of Contents
The following table sets forth the amount and maturities of time deposits classified by rates at December 31, 2010.
| Amount Due | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| (Dollars in thousands) |
Less Than One Year |
More Than One Year to Two Years |
More Than Two Years to Three Years |
More Than Three Years |
Total | Percent of Total Time Deposit Accounts |
||||||||||||||||||
| 0.00 – 0.99% |
$ | 48,411 | $ | 6,420 | $ | 304 | $ | 823 | $ | 55,958 | 23.37 | % | ||||||||||||
| 1.00 – 1.99% |
49,551 | 8,245 | 716 | 274 | 58,786 | 24.56 | ||||||||||||||||||
| 2.00 – 2.99% |
344 | 2,837 | 3,851 | 8,334 | 15,366 | 6.42 | ||||||||||||||||||
| 3.00 – 3.99% |
10,176 | 12,225 | 1,648 | 7,473 | 31,522 | 13.17 | ||||||||||||||||||
| 4.00 – 4.99% |
55,941 | 12,099 | 8,484 | — | 76,524 | 31.96 | ||||||||||||||||||
| 5.00 – 5.99% |
44 | 1,106 | 100 | — | 1,250 | 0.52 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Total |
$ | 164,467 | $ | 42,932 | $ | 15,103 | $ | 16,904 | $ | 239,406 | 100.00 | % | ||||||||||||
The following table sets forth deposit activity for the periods indicated.
| Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
| (In thousands) |
2010 | 2009 | 2008 | |||||||||
| Beginning balance |
$ | 380,931 | $ | 363,026 | $ | 321,398 | ||||||
| Increase before interest credited |
17,651 | 9,435 | 32,365 | |||||||||
| Interest credited |
7,293 | 8,470 | 9,263 | |||||||||
| Net increase in deposits |
24,944 | 17,905 | 41,628 | |||||||||
| Ending balance |
$ | 405,875 | $ | 380,931 | $ | 363,026 | ||||||
Borrowings. We borrow funds from the Federal Home Loan Bank of Boston during periods of low liquidity to match fund increases in our fixed-rate mortgage portfolio and to provide long-term fixed-rate funding with the goal of decreasing our exposure to an increase in interest rates. In addition, we occasionally borrow short-term from correspondent banks to cover temporary cash needs. At December 31, 2010, we had the ability to borrow a total of $3.5 million from a correspondent bank, none of which was borrowed at such date. We also use securities sold under agreements to repurchase as a source of borrowings.
The following table presents certain information regarding our Federal Home Loan Bank advances during the periods and at the dates indicated.
| Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
| (Dollars in thousands) |
2010 | 2009 | 2008 | |||||||||
| Maximum amount of advances outstanding at any month end during the period |
$ | 112,339 | $ | 117,211 | $ | 119,628 | ||||||
| Average advances outstanding during the period |
105,863 | 104,268 | 107,182 | |||||||||
| Weighted average interest rate during the period |
2.71 | % | 3.77 | % | 4.31 | % | ||||||
| Balance outstanding at end of period |
$ | 95,905 | $ | 112,553 | $ | 118,421 | ||||||
| Weighted average interest rate at end of period |
2.59 | % | 2.91 | % | 3.80 | % | ||||||
Stockholders’ Equity. Total stockholders’ equity increased by $2.0 million, or 3.9%, to $52.3 million at December 31, 2010 from $50.3 million at December 31, 2009. Total equity increased by $4.7 million, or 10.3%, to $50.3 million at December 31, 2009 from $45.6 million at December 31, 2008. The increase in stockholders’ equity for the year ended December 31, 2010 was primarily due to net income of $1.5 million for the year, and $558,000 in capital adjustments related to our 2005 Equity Incentive Plan, partially offset by dividends of $317,000 paid to stockholders, a net decrease to the unrealized loss on available-for-sale securities of $304,000 and stock repurchases of $44,000. Our average equity to average assets ratio was 9.13% at December 31, 2010, compared to 8.97% at
35
Table of Contents
December 31, 2009. Repurchased shares in 2010 relate to tax withholding obligations for restricted stock vestings. Repurchased shares are held as treasury stock and will be cancelled upon completion of the conversion.
Comparison of Operating Results for the Years Ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008
Overview.
| (Dollars in thousands) |
2010 | 2009 | 2008 | |||||||||
| Net income (loss) |
$ | 1,451 | $ | 1,993 | $ | (312 | ) | |||||
| Return (loss) on average assets |
0.25 | % | 0.37 | % | (0.06 | )% | ||||||
| Return (loss) on average equity |
2.79 | % | 4.10 | % | (0.64 | )% | ||||||
Net income for the year ended December 31, 2010 decreased $542,000 from net income in 2009. The decrease was primarily due to an increase of $2.2 million in the provision for loan losses and an increase in noninterest expense of $1.4 million, which were partially offset by a $2.5 million increase in net interest income and an increase of $546,000 in noninterest income. Noninterest expense in 2010 included $782,000 of expenses related to the terminated acquisition.
Net income for the year ended December 31, 2009 increased $2.3 million from net income in 2008. The increase was primarily due to the OTTI charge of $3.4 million ($2.2 million after tax) on auction rate pass through certificates with Fannie Mae preferred stock as underlying collateral recorded in 2008. We experienced an increase of $469,000 in the provision for loan losses and an increase in noninterest expense of $1.1 million, which were offset by a $1.5 million increase in net interest income. Excluding the OTTI charge, we experienced an increase in noninterest income of $400,000.
Net Interest Income.
Net interest income for the year ended December 31, 2010, totaled $18.3 million compared to $15.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2009, an increase of $2.5 million, or 15.9%. The increase in net interest income was primarily due to a decrease in interest expense. Interest expense decreased by $2.3 million, or 18.0% during this period, primarily due to a decrease in the average rates paid on interest bearing liabilities. The average rates paid on deposits and borrowings decreased by 56 basis points in 2010. We experienced an increase in the average balances of deposits of 5.3% for the twelve month period, while the average balances of borrowings increased by 3.9% over the same period. Increases in average balances of deposits were experienced in all categories of deposits.
We also experienced an increase in the average balance of interest earning assets of 3.9%, partially offset by a decrease in the average rate earned on these assets of 16 basis points. The increase in interest earning assets is attributed primarily to an increase in the loan portfolio, partially offset by decreases in the average balances of the investment portfolio over the same period. The average balances in the loan portfolio increased by 6.9% in 2010. The largest increases were in the commercial mortgage portfolio followed by a smaller increase in commercial business loans, partially offset by decreases in the average balances of construction, residential mortgages and consumer loans. The decrease in residential mortgages is due primarily to the sale of new, fixed-rate production through the Bank’s secondary mortgage operation that was significantly expanded in 2010.
Net interest income for the year ended December 31, 2009, totaled $15.8 million compared to $14.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2008, an increase of $1.5 million, or 10.2%. The increase in net interest income was primarily due to a decrease in interest expense. Interest expense decreased by $1.4 million, or 9.8% during this period, primarily due to a decrease in the average rates paid on interest bearing liabilities. The average rates paid on deposits and borrowings decreased by 51 basis points in 2009. We experienced an increase in the average balances of deposits of 9.2% for the twelve month period, while the average balances of borrowings increased by 5.3% over the same period. Increases in average balances of deposits were experienced in all categories, except checking and NOW accounts and money market accounts where there was a small decrease.
We also experienced an increase in the average balance of interest earning assets of 7.5%, partially offset by a decrease in the average rate earned on these assets of 40 basis points. The increase in interest earning assets is attributed primarily to an increase in the loan portfolio, partially offset by decreases in the average balances of the
36
Table of Contents
investment portfolio over the same periods. The average balances in the loan portfolio increased by 13.0% in 2009. The largest increases were in the commercial mortgage portfolio followed by the residential mortgage portfolio, due in part to the efforts of our business development officers to grow market share and attract new customers.
Average Balances and Yields. The following table presents information regarding average balances of assets and liabilities, the total dollar amounts of interest income and dividends, the total dollar amount of interest expense and the resulting average yields and costs. The yields and costs for the periods indicated are derived by dividing income or expense by the average balances of assets or liabilities, respectively, for the periods presented. For purposes of this table, average balances have been calculated using the average daily balances and nonaccrual loans are included in average balances only. During 2010, 2009 and 2008, we held tax-exempt municipal securities with average balances of $0, $950,000 and $9.9 million, respectively. During 2010, 2009 and 2008, we also held preferred money market securities with an average balance of $8.2 million, $9.2 million and $11.9 million, respectively, which recognize a dividends received deduction. The yields below do not reflect the tax benefits of these securities.
| At December
31, 2010 |
Year Ended December 31, | |||||||||||||||
| 2010 | ||||||||||||||||
| (Dollars in thousands) |
Yield/ Cost |
Average Balance |
Interest and Dividends |
Yield/ Cost |
||||||||||||
| Interest-earning assets: |
||||||||||||||||
| Loans |
5.47 | % | $ | 479,093 | $ | 26,820 | 5.60 | % | ||||||||
| Fed Funds sold |
0.04 | 3,251 | 3 | 0.09 | ||||||||||||
| Investment securities |
4.19 | 41,023 | 1,715 | 4.18 | ||||||||||||
| Federal Home Loan Bank stock |
— | 6,252 | — | — | ||||||||||||
| Total interest-earning assets |
5.33 | 529,619 | 28,538 | 5.39 | ||||||||||||
| Noninterest-earning assets |
— | 40,539 | — | — | ||||||||||||
| Total assets |
$ | 570,148 | $ | 28,538 | — | |||||||||||
| Interest-bearing liabilities: |
||||||||||||||||
| Certificate accounts |
2.68 | $ | 238,451 | $ | 6,617 | 2.77 | ||||||||||
| Regular savings accounts and escrow |
0.49 | 75,595 | 413 | 0.55 | ||||||||||||
| Checking and NOW accounts |
0.06 | 57,282 | 45 | 0.08 | ||||||||||||
| Money market savings accounts |
0.64 | 26,596 | 222 | 0.83 | ||||||||||||
| Total interest-bearing deposits |
1.73 | 397,924 | 7,297 | 1.83 | ||||||||||||
| FHLB advances |
2.59 | 105,863 | 2,871 | 2.71 | ||||||||||||
| Other borrowings |
0.70 | 12,182 | 111 | 0.91 | ||||||||||||
| Total interest-bearing liabilities |
1.88 | 515,969 | 10,279 | 1.99 | ||||||||||||
| Noninterest-bearing liabilities |
2,137 | |||||||||||||||
| Total liabilities |
518,106 | |||||||||||||||
| Stockholders’ equity |
52,052 | |||||||||||||||
| Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity |
$ | 570,158 | ||||||||||||||
| Net interest income |
$ | 18,259 | ||||||||||||||
| Interest rate spread |
3.45 | % | 3.40 | % | ||||||||||||
| Net interest margin |
3.45 | % | ||||||||||||||
| Average interest-earning assets to average interest-bearing liabilities |
102.65 | % | ||||||||||||||
37
Table of Contents
| Years Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2009 | 2008 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| (Dollars in thousands) |
Average Balance |
Interest and Dividends |
Yield/ Cost |
Average Balance |
Interest and Dividends |
Yield/ Cost |
||||||||||||||||||
| Interest-earning assets: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Loans |
$ | 448,131 | $ | 25,954 | 5.79 | % | $ | 396,524 | $ | 24,556 | 6.19 | % | ||||||||||||
| Fed Funds sold |
5,444 | 5 | 0.09 | 2,391 | 57 | 2.38 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Investment securities |
50,025 | 2,332 | 4.66 | 69,498 | 3,391 | 4.88 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Federal Home Loan Bank stock |
6,252 | — | — | 5,735 | 199 | 3.47 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Total interest-earning assets |
509,852 | 28,291 | 5.55 | 474,148 | 28,203 | 5.95 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Noninterest-earning assets |
32,484 | — | 30,910 | — | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Total assets |
$ | 542,336 | $ | 28,291 | $ | 505,058 | — | |||||||||||||||||
| Interest-bearing liabilities: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Certificate accounts |
$ | 237,850 | $ | 7,741 | 3.25 | $ | 216,595 | $ | 8,297 | 3.83 | ||||||||||||||
| Regular savings accounts and escrow |
60,825 | 390 | 0.64 | 48,130 | 288 | 0.60 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Checking and NOW accounts |
53,258 | 45 | 0.08 | 53,732 | 159 | 0.30 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Money market savings accounts |
25,790 | 301 | 1.17 | 27,607 | 527 | 1.91 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Total interest-bearing deposits |
377,723 | 8,477 | 2.24 | 346,064 | 9,271 | 2.68 | ||||||||||||||||||
| FHLB advances |
104,268 | 3,931 | 3.77 | 107,182 | 4,615 | 4.31 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Other borrowings |
9,316 | 129 | 1.38 | 654 | 18 | 2.75 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Total interest-bearing liabilities |
491,307 | 12,537 | 2.55 | 453,900 | 13,904 | 3.06 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Noninterest-bearing liabilities |
2,391 | 2,138 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total liabilities |
493,698 | 456,038 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Stockholders’ equity |
48,638 | 49,020 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity |
$ | 542,336 | $ | 505,058 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Net interest income |
$ | 15,754 | $ | 14,299 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Interest rate spread |
3.00 | % | 2.89 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Net interest margin |
3.09 | % | 3.02 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Average interest-earning assets to average interest-bearing liabilities |
103.77 | % | 104.46 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
38
Table of Contents
Rate/Volume Analysis. The following table sets forth the effects of changing rates and volumes on our net interest income. The rate column shows the effects attributable to changes in rate (changes in rate multiplied by prior volume). The volume column shows the effects attributable to changes in volume (changes in volume multiplied by prior rate). For purposes of this table, changes attributable to changes in both rate and volume that cannot be segregated have been allocated proportionately based on the changes due to rate and the changes due to volume. The net column represents the sum of the prior columns.
| Years Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2010 Compared to 2009 | 2009 Compared to 2008 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Increase (Decrease) Due to |
Increase (Decrease) Due to |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
| (In thousands) |
Volume | Rate | Net | Volume | Rate | Net | ||||||||||||||||||
| Interest income: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Loans |
$ | 1,677 | $ | (811 | ) | $ | 866 | $ | 2,784 | $ | (1,386 | ) | $ | 1,398 | ||||||||||
| Fed Funds sold |
(2 | ) | — | (2 | ) | (211 | ) | 159 | (52 | ) | ||||||||||||||
| Investment securities |
(392 | ) | (225 | ) | (617 | ) | (914 | ) | (145 | ) | (1,059 | ) | ||||||||||||
| Federal Home Loan Bank stock |
— | — | — | 20 | (219 | ) | (199 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
| Total interest income |
1,283 | (1,036 | ) | 247 | 1,679 | (1,591 | ) | 88 | ||||||||||||||||
| Interest expense: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Certificate accounts |
20 | (1,144 | ) | (1,124 | ) | 1,044 | (1,600 | ) | (556 | ) | ||||||||||||||
| Regular savings accounts |
59 | (36 | ) | 23 | 80 | 22 | 102 | |||||||||||||||||
| Checking and NOW accounts |
— | — | — | (1 | ) | (113 | ) | (114 | ) | |||||||||||||||
| Money market savings accounts |
10 | (89 | ) | (79 | ) | (33 | ) | (193 | ) | (226 | ) | |||||||||||||
| Total deposit expense |
89 | (1,269 | ) | (1,180 | ) | 1,090 | (1,884 | ) | (794 | ) | ||||||||||||||
| FHLB advances |
61 | (1,121 | ) | (1,060 | ) | (123 | ) | (561 | ) | (684 | ) | |||||||||||||
| Other borrowings |
161 | (179 | ) | (18 | ) | 115 | (4 | ) | 111 | |||||||||||||||
| Total interest expense |
311 | (2,569 | ) | (2,258 | ) | 1,082 | (2,449 | ) | (1,367 | ) | ||||||||||||||
| Net interest income |
$ | 972 | $ | 1,533 | $ | 2,505 | $ | 597 | $ | 858 | $ | 1,455 | ||||||||||||
Provision for Loan Losses. During the year ended December 31, 2010, a $3.4 million provision was made to the allowance for loan losses. The provision was related to net loan charge offs totaling $963,000, increased non-performing and classified loans, the change in the mix of the portfolio towards commercial loans which are generally riskier than one-to-four family loans, as well as adverse economic conditions.
During the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, provisions of $1.1 million and $675,000, respectively, were made to the allowance for loan losses. The provision was primarily due to the increased size of the loan portfolio, a change in the mix of the portfolio towards commercial loans which are generally riskier than one-to-four family loans, and general economic conditions.
39
Table of Contents
Noninterest Income. The following table shows the components of noninterest income for 2010, 2009 and 2008.
| (In thousands) |
2010 | 2009 | 2008 | |||||||||
| Fees for services related to deposit accounts |
$ | 970 | $ | 1,060 | $ | 1,053 | ||||||
| Mortgage banking fees |
945 | 20 | 23 | |||||||||
| Fees for other services |
730 | 554 | 506 | |||||||||
| Income from bank owned life insurance |
327 | 341 | 315 | |||||||||
| Income from investment advisory services, net |
182 | 271 | 299 | |||||||||
| Gain on investments |
11 | 388 | (3,398 | ) | ||||||||
| Other income |
123 | 108 | 154 | |||||||||
| Total |
$ | 3,288 | $ | 2,742 | $ | (1,048 | ) | |||||
For the year ended December 31, 2010, noninterest income increased to $3.3 million, compared to $2.7 million for 2009. The largest increase in noninterest income was primarily due to income generated from recording a mortgage servicing rights asset, which equaled $364,000 at December 31, 2010, combined with increased fees generated by increased activity in the secondary mortgage market. These increases were partially offset by a lower level of gains realized on the sale of investments, combined with decreases in income from investment advisory services, fees for services related to deposit accounts and income from bank owned life insurance.
For the year ended December 31, 2009, noninterest income increased to $2.7 million, compared to $(1.0) million for 2008. The largest increase in noninterest income was the gain on sale of investments. The 2008 period included the OTTI charge of $3.4 million on auction rate pass through certificates with Fannie Mae preferred stock as underlying collateral.
Noninterest Expense. The following table shows the components of noninterest expense for 2010, 2009 and 2008.
| (In thousands) |
2010 | 2009 | 2008 | |||||||||
| Compensation, taxes and benefits |
$ | 8,379 | $ | 7,692 | $ | 7,521 | ||||||
| Office occupancy |
2,348 | 2,151 | 2,173 | |||||||||
| Computer processing |
926 | 916 | 861 | |||||||||
| Costs related to terminated merger |
782 | 241 | — | |||||||||
| Professional fees |
461 | 433 | 518 | |||||||||
| FDIC insurance premiums |
681 | 946 | 132 | |||||||||
| Directors compensation |
565 | 560 | 493 | |||||||||
| Public company expenses |
87 | 78 | 80 | |||||||||
| Advertising |
344 | 330 | 534 | |||||||||
| Office supplies |
211 | 207 | 195 | |||||||||
| Loss on foreclosed real estate, net |
107 | 36 | 1 | |||||||||
| Other expenses (1) |
1,016 | 951 | 946 | |||||||||
| Total |
$ | 15,907 | $ | 14,541 | $ | 13,454 | ||||||
| (1) | Other expenses for all periods include, among other items, insurance, postage and expenses related to checking accounts. |
Noninterest expense was $15.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2010, compared to $14.5 million for 2009. The increase was the result of increases in all categories of noninterest expense except FDIC insurance premiums. In the second quarter of 2009, the FDIC announced a special assessment of five basis points on each insured institution’s assets minus Tier-1 capital. This special assessment was paid on September 30, 2009. Additionally, approximately $782,000 of expenses associated with the terminated acquisition of Southern Connecticut Bancorp are included in noninterest expense for 2010 compared to $241,000 for 2009.
40
Table of Contents
Noninterest expense was $14.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2009, compared to $13.5 million for 2008. The increase was primarily the result of increases in FDIC insurance premiums. In the second quarter of 2009, the FDIC announced a special assessment of five basis points on each insured institution’s assets minus Tier-1 capital. This special assessment was paid on September 30, 2009. Additionally, the increases in noninterest expense were due to increased professional fees, primarily as a result of fees related to the acquisition of Southern Connecticut Bancorp, Inc, and increases in compensation costs, primarily as a result of filling two vacant positions. These increases were partially offset by a decrease in advertising expense and office occupancy expenses.
Income Taxes. The effective tax rate for 2010 was 36.4%, compared with 29.1% for 2009. During 2010, the ability to carry forward the unused portion of the deduction relating to our contribution made to our charitable foundation in 2004 expired. See note 12 to the Naugatuck Valley Financial financial statements in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
The effective tax rate for 2009 was 29.1%, compared with 23.5% for 2008, excluding the tax benefit recorded for the OTTI charge in the 2008 period. See note 12 to the Naugatuck Valley Financial financial statements in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. During the year ended December 31, 2008, we recorded a tax benefit of $566,000 resulting primarily from the OTTI charge on auction rate pass through certificates with Fannie Mae preferred stock as underlying collateral.
Risk Management
Overview. Managing risk is an essential part of successfully managing a financial institution. Our most prominent risk exposures are credit risk, interest rate risk and market risk. Credit risk is the risk of not collecting the interest and/or the principal balance of a loan or investment when it is due. Interest rate risk is the potential reduction of net interest income as a result of changes in interest rates. Market risk arises from fluctuations in interest rates that may result in changes in the values of financial instruments, such as available-for-sale securities, that are accounted for on a mark-to-market basis. Other risks that we face are operational risks, liquidity risks and reputation risk. Operational risks include risks related to fraud, regulatory compliance, processing errors, technology and disaster recovery. Liquidity risk is the possible inability to fund obligations to depositors, lenders or borrowers due to unforeseen circumstances. Reputation risk is the risk that negative publicity or press, whether true or not, could cause a decline in our customer base or revenue.
Credit Risk Management. Our strategy for credit risk management focuses on having well-defined credit policies and uniform underwriting criteria and providing prompt attention to potential problem loans. To address increased problem assets, we have placed our attention and resources on loan workouts. One of our loan officers who has significant loan workout experience has been given primary responsibility for problem commercial loan workouts. We have tightened underwriting standards, including applying more stringent loan to value ratio requirements, and are contacting delinquent borrowers earlier in order to improve our chances of a successful outcome of work-out efforts. In addition, we annually engage an outside loan review firm to perform a thorough review of our loan portfolio. This review involves analyzing all large borrowing relationships, delinquency trends, and loan collateral valuation in order to identify impaired loans.
When a borrower fails to make a required loan payment, we take a number of steps to have the borrower cure the delinquency and restore the loan to current status. We make initial contact with the borrower when the loan becomes 15 days past due. If payment is not then received by the 30th day of delinquency, additional letters and phone calls are made. We send a letter notifying the borrower that we will commence foreclosure proceedings if the loan is not brought current within 91 days. At this point, we may consider loan workout arrangements with certain borrowers under certain circumstances. If our workout efforts are unsuccessful, we generally commence foreclosure proceedings against any real property that secures the loan or attempt to repossess any personal property that secures a consumer loan. If a foreclosure action is instituted and the loan is not brought current, paid in full, or refinanced before the foreclosure sale, the real property securing the loan generally is sold at foreclosure or taken by the bank as other real estate owned.
Management informs the board of directors on a monthly basis of the amount of loans delinquent more than 30 days. Management also provides detailed reporting of loans greater than 90 days delinquent, all loans in foreclosure and all foreclosed and repossessed property that we own.
41
Table of Contents
Analysis of Nonperforming and Classified Assets. When a loan becomes more than 90 days delinquent, the loan is placed on nonaccrual status at which time the accrual of interest ceases, the interest previously accrued to income is reversed and the loan is placed on a cash basis. Payments on a nonaccrual loan are applied to the outstanding principal and interest as determined at the time of collection of the loan.
We consider repossessed assets and loans that are more than 90 days past due to be nonperforming assets. Real estate that we acquire as a result of foreclosure or by deed-in-lieu of foreclosure is classified as foreclosed real estate until it is sold. When property is acquired it is recorded at the lower of its cost, which is the unpaid balance of the loan, or fair market value at the date of foreclosure. Holding costs and declines in fair value after acquisition of the property are charged against income.
Under current accounting guidelines, a loan is defined as impaired when, based on current information and events, it is probable that the creditor will be unable to collect all amounts due under the contractual terms of the loan agreement. We consider one- to four-family mortgage loans and consumer loans to be homogeneous and only evaluate them for impairment separately when they are delinquent or classified. Other loans are evaluated for impairment on an individual basis. At December 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, 25 and nine loans, respectively, were considered impaired.
The following table provides information with respect to our nonperforming assets at the dates indicated. We did not have any accruing loans past due 90 days or more at the dates presented.
| At December 31, | ||||||||||||||||||||
| (Dollars in thousands) |
2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | |||||||||||||||
| Nonaccrual loans: |
||||||||||||||||||||
| One- to four-family |
$ | 2,365 | $ | 1,352 | $ | 1,100 | $ | 422 | $ | 423 | ||||||||||
| Construction |
1,931 | 1,250 | 370 | — | 1,036 | |||||||||||||||
| Multi-family and commercial real estate |
5,136 | 2,114 | 1,001 | 356 | 352 | |||||||||||||||
| Commercial business |
1,276 | 452 | 142 | 144 | 142 | |||||||||||||||
| Consumer |
419 | 358 | 65 | 48 | 57 | |||||||||||||||
| Total |
11,127 | 5,526 | 2,678 | 970 | 2,010 | |||||||||||||||
| Troubled debt restructurings (nonaccrual) |
6,761 | 474 | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||
| Total nonperforming loans |
17,888 | 6,000 | 2,678 | 970 | 2,010 | |||||||||||||||
| Foreclosed real estate and other repossessed assets |
421 | 140 | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||
| Total nonperforming assets |
$ | 18,309 | $ | 6,140 | $ | 2,678 | $ | 970 | $ | 2,010 | ||||||||||
| Total nonperforming loans to total loans |
3.73 | % | 1.26 | % | 0.62 | % | 0.27 | % | 0.65 | % | ||||||||||
| Total nonperforming loans to total assets |
3.15 | % | 1.08 | % | 0.50 | % | 0.21 | % | 0.49 | % | ||||||||||
| Total nonperforming assets to total assets |
3.22 | % | 1.10 | % | 0.50 | % | 0.21 | % | 0.49 | % | ||||||||||
Other than disclosed in the above table and in the classified assets table below, management believes that there are no other loans at December 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009 that we have serious doubts about the ability of the borrowers to comply with the present loan repayment terms. Interest income that would have been recorded for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009 had nonaccruing loans been current according to their original terms amounted to $513,000 and $328,000, respectively. Income related to nonaccrual loans included in interest income for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009 amounted to $558,000 and $238,000, respectively.
Troubled debt restructurings occur when we grant borrowers concessions that we would not otherwise grant but for economic or legal reasons pertaining to the borrower’s financial difficulties. These concessions may include, but are not limited to, modifications of the terms of the debt, the transfer of assets or the issuance of an equity interest by the borrower to satisfy all or part of the debt, or the substitution or addition of borrower(s). Generally, we will not return a troubled debt restructuring to accrual status until the borrower has demonstrated the ability to make principal and interest payments under the restructured terms for at least six consecutive months.
From December 31, 2008 to December 31, 2010, we modified 28 residential mortgage loans, with aggregate outstanding balances of $5.3 million, either by a reduction of the interest rates, an extension of the terms,
42
Table of Contents
and/or interest only payments. As of December 31, 2010, we had 28 modified residential mortgage loans, nine of which, aggregating $1.2 million, were 30 days or more past due and the remaining were current.
From December 31, 2008 to December 31, 2010, we modified 29 commercial loans and commercial real estate loans, with aggregate outstanding balances of $24.0 million, either by an extension of the term, reduction of the interest rate, temporary interest only period, and/or changes of the payment schedule to principal and interest. As of December 31, 2010, we had 29 modified commercial loans, two of which, aggregating $806,000, were in foreclosure and the remaining were current.
Nonperforming assets totaled $18.3 million, or 3.22% of total assets, at December 31, 2010, which was an increase of approximately $12.2 million, or 198.2%, from December 31, 2009. Nonaccrual loans accounted for 97.7% of the total nonperforming assets at December 31, 2010. The increase was primarily the result of the placing of seven commercial mortgage relationships totaling $5.3 million, six commercial construction loan relationships totaling $4.3 million, 11 commercial business loans totaling $1.0 million, 13 residential mortgage loans totaling $3.0 million and five consumer loans totaling $507,000 on non-accrual status. Management is working closely with the borrowers to return these loans to accrual status.
Nonperforming assets totaled $6.1 million, or 1.10% of total assets, at December 31, 2009, which was an increase of approximately $3.5 million, or 129.3%, from December 31, 2008. Nonaccrual loans accounted for 97.7% of the total nonperforming assets at December 31, 2009. This increase was primarily due to increases in nonaccrual loans in the commercial real estate and residential mortgage loan portfolios, along with smaller increases in nonaccrual loans in the consumer and commercial business loan portfolios.
Federal regulations require us to regularly review and classify our assets. In addition, our regulators have the authority to identify problem assets and, if appropriate, require them to be classified. There are three classifications for problem assets: substandard, doubtful and loss. “Substandard assets” must have one or more defined weaknesses and are characterized by the distinct possibility that we will sustain some loss if the deficiencies are not corrected. “Doubtful assets” have the weaknesses of substandard assets with the additional characteristic that the weaknesses make collection or liquidation in full on the basis of currently existing facts, conditions and values questionable, and there is a high possibility of loss. An asset classified “loss” is considered uncollectible and of such little value that continuance as an asset of the institution is not warranted. The regulations also provide for a “special mention” category, described as assets which do not currently expose us to a sufficient degree of risk to warrant classification but do possess credit deficiencies or potential weaknesses deserving our close attention. If we classify an asset as loss, we must charge off such amount.
The following table shows the aggregate amounts of our classified assets at the dates indicated.
| At December 31, | ||||||||||||
| (In thousands) |
2010 | 2009 | 2008 | |||||||||
| Special mention assets |
$ | 28,593 | $ | 43,539 | $ | 30,268 | ||||||
| Substandard assets |
33,377 | 16,890 | 10,274 | |||||||||
| Doubtful assets |
111 | 37 | 4 | |||||||||
| Loss assets |
— | — | — | |||||||||
| Total classified assets |
$ | 62,081 | $ | 60,466 | $ | 40,546 | ||||||
Special mention assets at December 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, each included loans in the amount of $503,000 and $70,000, respectively, which were nonaccrual. Special mention assets at December 31, 2008 did not include any nonaccrual loans. Substandard assets at December 31, 2010, December 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008 included nonaccrual loans of $14.8 million, $5.8 million and $2.7 million, respectively. Doubtful assets at December 31, 2010, December 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008 included nonaccrual loans of $111,000, $9,000 and zero, respectively. The increase in loans classified as special mention in the 2010 and 2009 periods was due in part to the timeliness of the borrower’s financial information and general economic conditions.
43
Table of Contents
Delinquencies. The following table provides information about delinquencies in our loan portfolios at the dates indicated.
| At December 31, | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| (In thousands) |
31-60 Days Past Due |
61-90 Days Past Due |
31-60 Days Past Due |
61-90 Days Past Due |
31-60 Days Past Due |
61-90 Days Past Due |
||||||||||||||||||
| One- to four-family |
$ | 1,745 | $ | 18 | $ | 2,634 | $ | 328 | $ | 1,000 | $ | 724 | ||||||||||||
| Construction |
2,707 | — | 279 | 531 | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||
| Multi-family and commercial real estate |
1,686 | 258 | 968 | 2,182 | 84 | — | ||||||||||||||||||
| Commercial business |
60 | 115 | 373 | 25 | 568 | 7 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Consumer loans |
470 | 100 | 364 | 162 | 2 | 4 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Total |
$ | 6,668 | $ | 491 | $ | 4,618 | $ | 3,228 | $ | 1,654 | $ | 735 | ||||||||||||
The increase in delinquencies is attributable primarily to the effects of weakened economic conditions on our borrowers.
Analysis and Determination of the Allowance for Loan Losses. The allowance for loan losses is a valuation allowance for the probable losses inherent in the loan portfolio. We evaluate the need to establish allowances against losses on loans on a quarterly basis. When additional allowances are needed a provision for loan losses is charged against earnings. The recommendations for increases or decreases to the allowance are presented by management to the board of directors on a quarterly basis.
On a quarterly basis, or more often if warranted, management analyzes the loan portfolio. For individually evaluated loans that are considered impaired, an allowance will be established based on either the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate, the loan’s observable market price, or for loans that are considered collateral dependant, the fair value of the collateral. (A loan is considered impaired when, based on current information and events, it is probable that a creditor will be unable to collect all amounts due under the contractual term of the loan agreement.)
All other loans, including loans that are individually evaluated but not considered impaired, are segregated into groups based on similar risk factors. Each of these groups is then evaluated based on several factors to estimate credit losses. Management will determine for each category of loans with similar risk characteristics the historical loss rate. Historical loss rates provide a reasonable starting point for the Bank’s analysis but analysis and trends in losses do not form a sufficient basis to determine the appropriate level of the loan loss allowance. Management also considers qualitative and environmental factors likely to cause losses. These factors include but are not limited to: changes in the amount and severity of past due, non-accrual and adversely classified loans; changes in local, regional, and national economic conditions that will affect the collectability of the portfolio; changes in the nature and volume of loans in the portfolio; changes in concentrations of credit, lending area, industry concentrations, or types of borrowers; changes in lending policies, procedures, competition, management, portfolio mix, competition, pricing, loan to value trends, extension and modification requests; and loan quality trends. This analysis establishes factors that are applied to each of the segregated groups of loans to determine an acceptable level of loan loss allowance.
Our banking regulators, as an integral part of their examination process, periodically review our allowance for loan losses. The examination may require us to make additional provision for loan losses based on judgments different from ours. In addition, we engage an independent consultant to review our commercial loan portfolio and make recommendations based on their review as to the specific credits in the portfolio.
At December 31, 2010, our allowance for loan losses represented 1.33% of total gross loans and 35.74% of nonperforming loans compared to 0.84% of total gross loans and 66.6% of nonperforming loans at December 31, 2009. The allowance for loan losses increased $2.4 million from $4.0 million at December 31, 2009 to $6.4 million at December 31, 2010. The increase in the allowance was largely the result of a $3.4 million provision for loan
44
Table of Contents
losses made in 2010. This provision was based on the increase in nonperforming and classified loans, the increasing size of the loan portfolio and a change in the mix of the portfolio towards commercial real estate loans which are generally riskier than one-to-four family loans. Total nonperforming assets increased from $6.1 million at December 31, 2009, to $18.3 million at December 31, 2010. The increase was primarily in the commercial real estate, one-to-four family and commercial business loan portfolios and in troubled debt restructurings.
At December 31, 2009, our allowance for loan losses represented 0.84% of total gross loans and 66.6% of nonperforming loans compared to 0.66% of total gross loans and 107.13% of nonperforming loans at December 31, 2008. The allowance for loan losses increased $1.1 million from $2.9 million at December 31, 2008 to $4.0 million at December 31, 2009. The increase in the allowance was largely the result of a $1.1 million provision for loan losses made during 2009. This provision was based on the increasing size of the loan portfolio and a change in the mix of the portfolio towards commercial real estate loans which are generally riskier than one-to-four family loans. In addition, as discussed above, nonperforming loans and classified loans increased during the 2009 year. Total nonperforming assets increased from $2.7 million at December 31, 2008, to $6.0 million at December 31, 2009. The increase was primarily in the commercial real estate and residential loan portfolios.
Although we believe that we use the best information available to establish the allowance for loan losses, future adjustments to the allowance for loan losses may be necessary and results of operations could be adversely affected if circumstances differ substantially from the assumptions used in making the determinations. Furthermore, while we believe we have established our allowance for loan losses in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles, there can be no assurance that regulators, in reviewing our loan portfolio, will not request us to increase our allowance for loan losses. In addition, because further events affecting borrowers and collateral cannot be predicted with certainty, there can be no assurance that the existing allowance for loan losses is adequate or that increases will not be necessary should the quality of any loans deteriorate as a result of the factors discussed above. Any material increase in the allowance for loan losses may adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.
45
Table of Contents
Analysis of Loan Loss Experience. The following table sets forth an analysis of the allowance for loan losses for the periods indicated. Where specific loan loss allowances have been established, any difference between the loss allowance and the amount of loss realized has been charged or credited to current income.
| Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||||||||||
| (Dollars in thousands) |
2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | |||||||||||||||
| Allowance at beginning of period |
$ | 3,996 | $ | 2,869 | $ | 2,163 | $ | 2,071 | $ | 1,878 | ||||||||||
| Provision for loan losses |
3,360 | 1,144 | 675 | 151 | 192 | |||||||||||||||
| Less: Charge offs: |
||||||||||||||||||||
| Real estate loans |
27 | — | — | 46 | — | |||||||||||||||
| Commercial business loans |
924 | 12 | — | 5 | — | |||||||||||||||
| Consumer loans |
27 | 6 | 7 | 10 | 2 | |||||||||||||||
| Total charge-offs |
978 | 18 | 7 | 61 | 2 | |||||||||||||||
| Plus: Recoveries: |
||||||||||||||||||||
| Real estate loans |
— | — | 38 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||||||
| Commercial business loans |
15 | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||
| Consumer loans |
— | 1 | — | 1 | — | |||||||||||||||
| Total recoveries |
15 | 1 | 38 | 2 | 3 | |||||||||||||||
| Net charge-offs (recoveries) |
963 | 17 | (31 | ) | 59 | (1 | ) | |||||||||||||
| Allowance at end of period |
$ | 6,393 | $ | 3,996 | $ | 2,869 | $ | 2,163 | $ | 2,071 | ||||||||||
| Allowance to nonperforming loans |
35.74 | % | 66.60 | % | 107.13 | % | 222.99 | % | 103.03 | % | ||||||||||
| Allowance to total loans outstanding at the end of the period |
1.33 | % | 0.84 | % | 0.66 | % | 0.60 | % | 0.67 | % | ||||||||||
| Net charge-offs (recoveries) to average loans outstanding during the period |
0.20 | % | — | % | (0.01 | )% | 0.02 | % | — | % | ||||||||||
Net charge-offs increased in 2010 due to the charge-off of nine commercial loans ($739,000), one construction loan ($170,000), three residential mortgage loans ($27,000) and four consumer loans ($27,000).
46
Table of Contents
The following table sets forth the breakdown of the allowance for loan losses by loan category at the dates indicated.
| At December 31, | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| (Dollars in thousands) |
Amount | % of Allowance to Total Allowance |
% of Loans in Category to Total Loans |
Amount | % of Allowance to Total Allowance |
% of Loans in Category to Total Loans |
||||||||||||||||||
| One- to four-family |
$ | 1,585 | 24.79 | % | 45.56 | % | $ | 1,044 | 26.13 | % | 47.74 | % | ||||||||||||
| Construction |
600 | 9.39 | 6.42 | 632 | 15.81 | 9.62 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Multi-family and commercial real estate |
2,714 | 42.45 | 33.29 | 1,489 | 37.26 | 28.05 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Commercial business |
884 | 13.83 | 7.22 | 481 | 12.04 | 6.51 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Consumer loans |
610 | 9.54 | 7.51 | 350 | 8.76 | 8.08 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Total allowance for loan losses |
$ | 6,393 | 100.00 | % | 100.00 | % | $ | 3,996 | 100.00 | % | 100.00 | % | ||||||||||||
| At December 31, | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2008 | 2007 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| (Dollars in thousands) |
Amount | % of Allowance to Total Allowance |
% of Loans in Category to Total Loans |
Amount | % of Allowance to Total Allowance |
% of Loans in Category to Total Loans |
||||||||||||||||||
| One- to four-family |
$ | 762 | 26.56 | % | 49.51 | % | $ | 661 | 30.56 | % | 53.24 | % | ||||||||||||
| Construction |
621 | 21.65 | 11.59 | 473 | 21.87 | 11.27 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Multi-family and commercial real estate |
903 | 31.47 | 24.28 | 495 | 22.88 | 19.25 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Commercial business |
251 | 8.75 | 5.17 | 185 | 8.55 | 4.59 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Consumer loans |
332 | 11.57 | 9.45 | 349 | 16.14 | 11.65 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Total allowance for loan losses |
$ | 2,869 | 100.00 | % | 100.00 | % | $ | 2,163 | 100.00 | % | 100.00 | % | ||||||||||||
| 2006 | ||||||||||||
| (Dollars in thousands) |
Amount | % of Allowance to Total Allowance |
% of Loans in Category to Total Loans |
|||||||||
| One- to four-family |
$ | 718 | 34.67 | % | 57.27 | % | ||||||
| Construction |
464 | 22.40 | 9.62 | |||||||||
| Multi-family and commercial real estate |
347 | 16.76 | 14.65 | |||||||||
| Commercial business |
209 | 10.09 | 4.31 | |||||||||
| Consumer loans |
333 | 16.08 | 14.15 | |||||||||
| Total allowance for loan losses |
$ | 2,071 | 100.00 | % | 100.00 | % | ||||||
Interest Rate Risk Analysis
Our most significant form of market risk is interest rate risk. We manage the interest rate sensitivity of our interest-bearing liabilities and interest-earning assets in an effort to minimize the adverse effects of changes in the interest rate environment. Deposit accounts typically react more quickly to changes in market interest rates than mortgage loans because of the shorter maturities of deposits. As a result, sharp increases in interest rates may adversely affect our earnings while decreases in interest rates may beneficially affect our earnings. To reduce the potential volatility of our earnings, we have sought to improve the match between assets and liability maturities (or rate adjustment periods), while maintaining an acceptable interest rate spread, by originating adjustable-rate
47
Table of Contents
mortgage loans for retention in our loan portfolio, variable-rate home equity lines and variable-rate commercial loans and by purchasing variable-rate investments and investments with expected maturities of less than 10 years. Generally, loans are sold without recourse and with servicing retained. We currently do not participate in hedging programs, interest rate swaps or other activities involving the use of off-balance sheet derivative financial instruments.
Our Asset/Liability Committee communicates, coordinates and controls all aspects of asset/liability management. The committee establishes and monitors the volume and mix of assets and funding sources with the objective of managing assets and funding sources.
We also use a third party consultant to perform interest rate sensitivity and net interest income simulation analysis. The net interest income simulation measures the volatility of net interest income as a consequence of different interest rate conditions at a particular point in time. Using a range of assumptions, the simulations provide an estimate of the impact of changes in interest rates on net interest income. The various assumptions used in the model are reviewed on a quarterly basis by the asset/liability committee. Changes to these assumptions can significantly affect the results of the simulation.
The following table, which is based on information that we provided to our third party as of December 31, 2010, presents an approximation of our exposure as a percentage of estimated net interest income for the next 12-month period using interest income simulation. The simulation uses projected repricing of assets and liabilities on the basis of contractual maturities, anticipated repayments and scheduled rate adjustments. Prepayment speeds can have a significant impact on the interest income simulation. When interest rates rise, prepayment speeds tend to slow down. When interest rates fall, prepayment speeds tend to increase. We believe that our assumptions included in the simulation are reasonable; however, there can be no guarantee that these prepayment rates will approximate actual future repayment activity. Our third party consultant also performs dynamic modeling. This type of modeling employs a further set of assumptions attempting to simulate scenarios that are more likely than an immediate and sustained shock of 100 to 300 basis points and include the business planning strategies. The change in rates are assumed to occur immediately.
| Basic Point (“bp) Changes in Rates |
At December 31,
2010 Percentage Change in Estimated Net Interest Income Over 12 Months |
|||
| +300 bp | -7.25 | % | ||
| +200 | -4.19 | |||
| +100 | -2.09 | |||
| 0 | — | |||
| -100 | 1.16 | |||
Net Portfolio Value Analysis. We use an interest rate sensitivity analysis prepared by the Office of Thrift Supervision to review our level of interest rate risk. This analysis measures interest rate risk by computing changes in net portfolio value of our cash flows from assets, liabilities and off-balance sheet items in the event of a range of assumed changes in market interest rates. Net portfolio value represents the market value of portfolio equity and is equal to the market value of assets minus the market value of liabilities, with adjustments made for off-balance sheet items. This analysis assesses the risk of loss in market risk sensitive instruments in the event of a sudden and sustained 50 to 300 basis point increase or a 50 to 100 basis point decrease in market interest rates with no effect given to any steps that we might take to counter the effect of that interest rate movement. We measure interest rate risk by modeling the changes in net portfolio value over a variety of interest rate scenarios. The following table, which is based on information that we provide to the Office of Thrift Supervision, presents the change in net portfolio value of Naugatuck Valley Savings at December 31, 2010 that would occur in the event of an immediate change in interest rates based on Office of Thrift Supervision assumptions, with no effect given to any steps that we might take to counteract that change.
48
Table of Contents
| Basis Point (“bp”) Change in Rates |
Net Portfolio Value | Net Portfolio Value as % of Present Value of Assets |
||||||||||||||||||
| $ Amount | $ Change | % Change | NPV Ratio | Change | ||||||||||||||||
| (Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 300 bp | $ | 40,012 | $ | (20,953 | ) | (34 | )% | 7.19 | % | (3.13 | )% | |||||||||
| 200 | 48,446 | (12,519 | ) | (21 | ) | 8.51 | (1.81 | ) | ||||||||||||
| 100 | 56,076 | (4,889 | ) | (8 | ) | 9.65 | (0.67 | ) | ||||||||||||
| 50 | 58,988 | (1,977 | ) | (3 | ) | 10.06 | (0.26 | ) | ||||||||||||
| 0 | 60,965 | — | — | 10.32 | — | |||||||||||||||
| -50 | 61,850 | 885 | 1 | 10.42 | 0.10 | |||||||||||||||
| -100 | 62,552 | 1,587 | 3 | 10.50 | 0.18 | |||||||||||||||
The Office of Thrift Supervision uses certain assumptions in assessing the interest rate risk of savings institutions. These assumptions relate to interest rates, loan prepayment rates, deposit decay rates, and the market values of certain assets under differing interest rate scenarios, among others. As with any method of measuring interest rate risk, certain shortcomings are inherent in the method of analysis presented in the foregoing table. For example, although certain assets and liabilities may have similar maturities or periods to repricing, they may react in different degrees to changes in market interest rates. Also, the interest rates on certain types of assets and liabilities may fluctuate in advance of changes in market interest rates, while interest rates on other types may lag behind changes in market rates. Additionally, certain assets, such as adjustable-rate mortgage loans, have features that restrict changes in interest rates on a short-term basis and over the life of the asset. Further, in the event of a change in interest rates, expected rates of prepayments on loans and early withdrawals from certificates could deviate significantly from those assumed in calculating the table.
Liquidity Management
Liquidity is the ability to meet current and future short-term financial obligations. Our primary sources of funds consist of deposit inflows, loan repayments, maturities and sales of investment securities, and advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank of Boston. While maturities and scheduled amortization of loans and securities are predictable sources of funds, deposit flows and mortgage prepayments are greatly influenced by general interest rates, economic conditions and competition.
Each quarter we project liquidity availability and demands on this liquidity for the next 90 days. We regularly adjust our investments in liquid assets based upon our assessment of (1) expected loan demand, (2) expected deposit flows, (3) yields available on interest-earning deposits and securities, and (4) the objectives of our asset/liability management program. Excess liquid assets are invested generally in federal funds and short- and intermediate-term U.S. Government agency obligations.
Our most liquid assets are cash and cash equivalents and interest-bearing deposits. The levels of these assets depend on our operating, financing, lending and investing activities during any given period. At December 31, 2010, cash and cash equivalents totaled approximately $14.3 million, including federal funds of $2.6 million. Securities classified as available for sale, which provide additional sources of liquidity, totaled $31.7 million. At December 31, 2010, we had the ability to borrow a total of $149.2 million from the Federal Home Loan Bank of Boston, of which $95.9 million was outstanding, along with $6.9 million in repurchase agreements. At December 31, 2010, we had arranged overnight lines of credit of $2.5 million with the Federal Home Loan Bank of Boston. We had no overnight advances outstanding with the Federal Home Loan Bank of Boston on this date. In addition, at December 31, 2010, we had the ability to borrow $3.5 million from a correspondent bank, none of which was outstanding at that date.
At December 31, 2010, we had $19.6 million in unused line availability on home equity lines of credit, $19.8 million in unadvanced commercial lines, $2.6 million in mortgage commitments, $4.9 million in commercial mortgage loan commitments, $17.9 million in unadvanced construction mortgage commitments, $4.2 million in letters of credit, $4.8 in commercial business loan commitments and $108,000 in overdraft line of credit availability.
49
Table of Contents
Certificates of deposit due within one year of December 31, 2010 totaled $164.5 million, or 40.5% of total deposits. If these deposits do not remain with us, we will be required to seek other sources of funds, including other certificates of deposit and lines of credit. Depending on market conditions, we may be required to pay higher rates on such deposits or other borrowings than we currently pay on the certificates of deposit due on or before December 31, 2011. We believe, however, based on past experience, that a significant portion of our certificates of deposit will remain with us. We have the ability to attract and retain deposits by adjusting the interest rates offered.
Historically, we have remained highly liquid. We expect that all of our liquidity needs, including the contractual commitments set forth in the table below, the estimated costs of our branch expansion plans and increases in loan demand can be met by our currently available liquid assets and cash flows. If loan demand were to increase at a pace greater than expected, or any unforeseen demand or commitment were to occur, we would access our borrowing capacity with the Federal Home Loan Bank of Boston. We expect that our currently available liquid assets and our ability to borrow from the Federal Home Loan Bank of Boston would be sufficient to satisfy our liquidity needs without any material adverse effect on our liquidity. We are not aware of any trends and/or demands, commitments, events or uncertainties that could result in a material decrease in liquidity.
The following table presents certain of our contractual obligations as of December 31, 2010.
| Payments Due by Period | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Contractual Obligations |
Total | Less Than One Year |
One to Three Years |
Three to Five Years |
More Than Five Years |
|||||||||||||||
| (In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Operating lease obligations (1) |
$ | 2,037 | $ | 315 | $ | 559 | $ | 489 | $ | 674 | ||||||||||
| FHLB advances and other borrowings (2) |
102,842 | 38,566 | 46,888 | 16,316 | 1,072 | |||||||||||||||
| Total |
$ | 104,879 | $ | 38,881 | $ | 47,447 | $ | 16,805 | $ | 1,746 | ||||||||||
| (1) | Represents lease obligations for five of Naugatuck Valley Savings and Loan’s branch offices and one former branch site which is subleased to another tenant. |
| (2) | Represents principal amounts due. |
Our primary investing activities are the origination of loans and the purchase and sale of securities. Our primary financing activities consist of activity in deposit accounts and borrowed funds. Deposit flows are affected by the overall levels of interest rates, the interest rates and products offered by us and our local competitors and other factors. We generally manage the pricing of our deposits to be competitive and to increase core deposit relationships. Occasionally, we offer promotional rates on certain deposit products to attract deposits.
The following table presents our primary investing and financing activities during the periods indicated.
| Year
Ended December 31, |
||||||||
| (In thousands) |
2010 | 2009 | ||||||
| Investing activities: |
||||||||
| Loan originations |
$ | 141,419 | $ | 132,776 | ||||
| Other decreases in loans |
138,014 | 90,206 | ||||||
| Security purchases |
23,941 | 1,566 | ||||||
| Security sales |
7,775 | 19,374 | ||||||
| Security maturities, calls and principal repayments |
7,548 | 10,022 | ||||||
| Financing activities: |
||||||||
| Increases in deposits |
24,943 | 17,905 | ||||||
| Net (decrease) increase in FHLB advances |
(16,648 | ) | (5,868 | ) | ||||
| Increase (decrease) in other borrowings |
506 | 4,363 | ||||||
| Purchase of treasury stock |
44 | 25 | ||||||
50
Table of Contents
Capital Management. We are subject to various regulatory capital requirements administered by the Office of Thrift Supervision, including a risk-based capital measure. The risk-based capital guidelines include both a definition of capital and a framework for calculating risk-weighted assets by assigning balance sheet assets and off-balance sheet items to broad risk categories. At December 31, 2010, we exceeded all of our regulatory capital requirements. We are considered “well capitalized” under regulatory guidelines. See “Regulation and Supervision—Regulation of Federal Savings Associations—Capital Requirements,” and “—Regulatory Capital Compliance” and the notes to the consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. In addition, due in part to its sufficient capital level, Naugatuck Valley Financial did not participate in the U.S. Government-sponsored Troubled Asset Relief Program (“TARP”).
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
In the normal course of operations, we engage in a variety of financial transactions that, in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, are not recorded in our financial statements. These transactions involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit, interest rate, and liquidity risk. Such transactions are used primarily to manage customers’ requests for funding and take the form of loan commitments, unused lines of credit, amounts due mortgagors on construction loans, amounts due on commercial loans, commercial letters of credit and commitments to sell loans. See note 16 of the notes to the financial statements in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
For the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, we engaged in no off-balance-sheet transactions reasonably likely to have a material effect on our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.
Impact of Recent Accounting Pronouncements
The information required by this item is included in note 3 to the consolidated financial statements for Naugatuck Valley Financial included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Effect of Inflation and Changing Prices
We have prepared the financial statements and related financial data presented in this Annual Report on Form 10-K in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States, which require the measurement of financial position and operating results in terms of historical dollars without considering the change in the relative purchasing power of money over time due to inflation. The primary impact of inflation on our operations is reflected in increased operating costs. Unlike most industrial companies, virtually all of our assets and liabilities are monetary in nature. As a result, interest rates generally have a more significant impact on our performance than do general levels of inflation. Interest rates do not necessarily move in the same direction or to the same extent as the prices of goods and services.
| ITEM 7A. | QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK. |
The information required by this item is incorporated herein by reference to part II, Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.”
| ITEM 8. | FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTAL DATA. |
The information regarding by this item is included herein beginning on page F-1.
| ITEM 9. | CHANGE IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE. |
Not applicable.
51
Table of Contents
| ITEM 9A. | CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES. |
| (a) | Disclosure Controls and Procedures |
The Company’s management, including the Company’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer, have evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s “disclosure controls and procedures,” as such term is defined in Rule 13a-15(e) promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, (the “Exchange Act”). Based upon their evaluation, the principal executive officer and principal financial officer concluded that, as of the end of the period covered by this report, the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective for the purpose of ensuring that the information required to be disclosed in the reports that the Company files or submits under the Exchange Act with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) (1) is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and (2) is accumulated and communicated to the Company’s management, including its principal executive and principal financial officers, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
| (b) | Internal Controls Over Financial Reporting |
Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
The management of the Company is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. The internal control process has been designed under our supervision to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of the Company’s financial statements for external reporting purposes in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
Management conducted an assessment of the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2010, utilizing the framework established in Internal Control – Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Based on this assessment, management has determined that the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2010 is effective.
Our internal control over financial reporting includes policies and procedures that pertain to the maintenance of records that accurately and fairly reflect, in reasonable detail, transactions and dispositions of assets; and provide reasonable assurances that: (1) transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States; (2) receipts and expenditures are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and the directors of the Company; and (3) unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the Company’s assets that could have a material effect on the Company’s financial statements are prevented or timely detected.
All internal control systems, no matter how well designed, have inherent limitations. Therefore, even those systems determined to be effective can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation and presentation. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
| (c) | Changes to Internal Control Over Financial Reporting |
There were no changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting during the three months ended December 31, 2010 that have materially affected, or are reasonable likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.
52
Table of Contents
| ITEM 9B. | OTHER INFORMATION. |
Not applicable.
PART III
| ITEM 10. | DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE. |
Directors
Directors with Terms Ending in 2011:
Carlos S. Batista is Vice President of Sales and Business Development for Water and Waste Water Automation Solutions, a business unit of PWS/Power & Water Solutions, a Division of Emerson Process Management. Age 61. Director since 1999. Chairman of the Board since 2009. Mr. Batista is currently Chairman of the Audit Committee.
Mr. Batista holds a Bachelors Degree in Electrical and Electronics Engineering and a Masters in Business Administration from the University of New Haven. He is a member of the Alpha Sigma Lambda National Honor Society at the University of New Haven. He has extensive experience in Systems Contracting, Marketing and Sales Engineering, gained throughout his long history of experiences and various company wide positions in the industry. Through customer relationship management he has been a major contributor to the development and expansion of products, systems and solutions in water and wastewater treatment for RAS-Bristol/Emerson. His management experience in a regulated industry has exposed Mr. Batista to many of the issues facing public companies today, particularly regulated entities, making Mr. Batista a valued component of a well rounded Board. Based on his experiences, qualifications, attributes and skills set forth above, the board of directors determined that Mr. Batista should serve as a director.
John C. Roman has served as President and Chief Executive Officer of Naugatuck Valley Financial and Naugatuck Valley Mutual Holding Company since 2004 and has been President and Chief Executive Officer of Naugatuck Valley Savings since September 1999. Mr. Roman previously was the Vice President and Chief Lending Officer of Naugatuck Valley Savings. Age 57. Director since 1999.
Since assuming the role of President and Chief Executive Office of Naugatuck Valley Savings in 1999, Mr. Roman has successfully completed a mutual to stock conversion and navigated the issues facing public companies within the banking sector. Mr. Roman’s knowledge of all aspects of the business and its history, combined with his drive for responsible growth and excellence, position him well to continue to serve as our President and Chief Executive Officer and as a Board member. Based on his experiences, qualifications, attributes and skills set forth above, the board of directors determined that Mr. Roman should serve as a director.
Camilo P. Vieira is a consultant with, and previously served as the President of, CM Property Management, a property management firm. Mr. Vieira previously served with IBM Corp. as a project and financial manager for over 30 years. Age 67. Director since 2002.
Through his experience at IBM, Mr. Vieira brings substantial financial expertise, while his real estate management provides further experience in matters directly related to the business of the Company. Mr. Vieira’s varied experience in both real estate management and project management and finance is an integral part of the board’s composition. Based on his experiences, qualifications, attributes and skills set forth above, the board of directors determined that Mr. Vieira should serve as a director.
Directors with Terms Ending in 2012:
Richard M. Famiglietti has been the owner of CM Property Management, a property management firm, since 2002. Previously, Mr. Famiglietti was a Vice President of sales for Naugatuck Glass Company, a glass fabricator. Age 63. Director since 2000.
53
Table of Contents
Mr. Famiglietti’s experience as owner of a property management company provides the Board with critical experience in real estate matters, as well as, experience as a small business owner. In addition, Mr. Famiglietti brings substantial management experience and expertise in sales and marketing, specifically within the region in which the Company conducts its business, through his experience as Vice President of sales for Naugatuck Glass Company. Based on his experience, qualifications, attributes and skills set forth above, the board of directors determined that Mr. Famiglietti should serve as a director.
Frederick A. Dlugokecki is an attorney and has maintained a private practice in Naugatuck, Connecticut focusing on real estate, bankruptcy, estate planning and business and tax issues since 1990. Mr. Dlugokecki graduated with high honors from The Catholic University of America, School of Law, and from the University of Connecticut, School of Business, magna cum laude, with Distinction in Finance. Age 54. Director since 2009.
Mr. Dlugokecki was previously employed in Washington, D.C., with The United States Department of Justice, Tax Division and the General Counsel’s Office of The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. In Philadelphia, PA, he was employed with the law firms of Duane, Morris, LLP and Saul, Ewing, LLP. Mr. Dlugokecki went on to hold the position of General Counsel with Hansen Properties of Ambler, PA. Mr. Dlugokecki has taught law classes at various universities, including Post University and Temple University Law School.
Mr. Dlugokecki’s experience and professional focus as an attorney correlates positively to the business and operational issues of Naugatuck Valley Savings. As an active legal practitioner in the local area, Mr. Dlugokecki also offers the Board valuable insight into the local business community. Based on his experience, qualifications, attributes and skills set forth above, the board of directors determined that Mr. Dlugokecki should serve as a director.
Directors with Terms Ending in 2013:
James A. Mengacci has been the owner of the Mengacci Agency, Inc. since 1999. The Mengacci Agency provides consultative services to funeral service professionals, insurance funding options for pre-paid funeral contracts and tailored individual and group final expense plans. Mr. Mengacci previously was the Secretary and Treasurer of Fitzgerald Funeral Home, Inc. Age 52. Director since 1988.
Through his experiences an independent business owner and as a treasurer of a local business, Mr. Mengacci brings substantial management experience and tenure to the Board and can offer the Board a unique perspective on the issues it faces. Based on his experience, qualifications, attributes and skills set forth above, the board of directors determined that Mr. Mengacci should serve as a director.
Jane H. Walsh served as Senior Vice President of Naugatuck Valley Savings, Naugatuck Valley Financial and Naugatuck Valley Mutual Holding Company before her retirement in August 2007. Ms. Walsh has served with Naugatuck Valley Savings and Loan for over 31 years. Age 67. Director since 2001.
As a result of Ms. Walsh’ tenure with Naugatuck Valley Savings and Loan as Senior Vice President of Operations, she affords the Board the opportunity to utilize her deep knowledge of and insight into the institution, its market areas and operational risks. Based on her experience, qualifications, attributes and skills set forth above, the board of directors determined that Ms. Walsh should serve as a director.
Executive Officers
For information relating to officers of Naugatuck Valley Financial, the section captioned Part I, Item 1, “Business—Executive Officers of the Registrant” in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, are incorporated by reference.
Compliance with Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act
Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 requires Naugatuck Valley Financial’s executive officers and directors, and persons who own more than 10% of any registered class of Naugatuck Valley Financial’s equity securities, to file reports of ownership and changes in ownership with the Securities and Exchange
54
Table of Contents
Commission. These individuals are required by regulation to furnish Naugatuck Valley Financial with copies of all Section 16(a) reports they file.
Based solely on its review of the copies of the reports it has received and written representations provided to Naugatuck Valley Financial from the individuals required to file the reports, Naugatuck Valley Financial believes that each of its executive officers and directors has complied with applicable reporting requirements for transactions in Company common stock during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010.
Disclosure of Code of Ethics
Naugatuck Valley Financial has adopted a Code of Ethics and Business Conduct that is designed to ensure that the Company’s directors, executive officers and employees meet the highest standards of ethical conduct. The Code of Ethics and Business Conduct requires that the Company’s directors, executive officers and employees avoid conflicts of interest, comply with all laws and other legal requirements, conduct business in an honest and ethical manner and otherwise act with integrity and in the Company’s best interest. Under the terms of the Code of Ethics and Business Conduct, directors, executive officers and employees are required to report any conduct that they believe in good faith to be an actual or apparent violation of the Code. A copy of the Code of Ethics and Business Conduct can be found as an exhibit to this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Corporate Governance
Audit Committee. The Board of Directors has a separately-designated standing Audit Committee established in accordance with Section 3(a)(58)(A) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. This committee meets periodically with the independent registered public accountants and management to review accounting, auditing, internal control structure and financial reporting matters. Each member of the committee, through past employment experience in finance or accounting, requisite professional certification in accounting, or any other comparable experience or background, possesses “financial sophistication,” even though Nasdaq Stock Market rules require only that at least one member possess such qualification. Since Michael Plude’s term expired at the 2010 annual meeting, the Company currently does not have a director who qualifies as an “audit committee financial expert” under federal securities laws. The Company is actively engaged in recruiting a “financial expert” to appoint to the Audit Committee.
2010 Director Compensation
The following table provides the compensation received by individuals who served as non-employee directors of Naugatuck Valley Financial during the 2010 fiscal year.
| Name |
Fees Earned or Paid in Cash (1) |
Stock Awards |
Option Awards (2) |
All Other Compensation |
Total ($) | |||||||||||||||
| Carlos S. Batista |
$ | 88,800 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 2,099 | $ | 90,899 | ||||||||||
| Frederick A. Dlugokecki |
68,000 | — | — | — | 68,000 | |||||||||||||||
| Richard M. Famiglietti |
56,800 | — | — | 3,133 | 59,933 | |||||||||||||||
| James A. Mengacci |
64,400 | — | — | 1,465 | 65,865 | |||||||||||||||
| Michael S. Plude (3) |
25,500 | — | — | 454 | 25,954 | |||||||||||||||
| Camilo P. Vieira |
49,900 | — | — | 1,465 | 51,365 | |||||||||||||||
| Jane H. Walsh |
51,900 | — | — | 3,133 | 55,033 | |||||||||||||||
| (1) | Includes fees earned for service with Naugatuck Valley Savings, Naugatuck Valley Financial and Naugatuck Valley Mutual Holding Company. Also includes $10,000 supplemental payment credited under the Deferred Compensation Plan for Directors for Messrs. Batista, Famiglietti, Mengacci, Plude and Vieira and Ms. Walsh. |
| (2) | The aggregate number of options held by each non-employee director at fiscal year end was 18,630, except for Ms. Walsh, who held 22,000 options at fiscal year end. |
| (3) | Mr. Plude’s term as director expired at our 2010 annual meeting of stockholders. |
Cash Retainer and Meeting Fees for Non-Employee Directors. Naugatuck Valley Savings maintains a standard compensation arrangement for its non-employee directors and committee members that is comprised of annual retainers for board service, board meeting attendance and committee meeting attendance. For the fiscal 2010
55
Table of Contents
year, directors were paid $7,500 ($11,500 for Chairman) in an annual retainer for board service, $500 per board meeting attended (regular or special) and $400 per committee meeting attended. The Chairman of the Board also received $400 per month as Asset/Liability Committee liaison.
Non-employee directors of Naugatuck Valley Financial receive $500 quarterly retainers, and audit committee members receive $400 per audit committee meeting attended. Non-employee directors of Naugatuck Valley Mutual Holding Company receive a $500 annual retainer.
Deferred Compensation Plan. Naugatuck Valley Financial and Naugatuck Valley Savings and Loan sponsor a deferred compensation plan for directors. All non-employee directors participate in the deferred compensation plan except for Mr. Dlugokecki. Benefits under the plan consist of amounts previously deferred under a predecessor plan and current deferrals of board remuneration that would have otherwise been payable in cash. The plan also provides for a $10,000 annual payment to each active director, which the director may elect to defer under the plan. In addition, the deferred compensation plan provides supplemental benefits in the event of a change in control or upon a director’s death (before age 70), termination of service due to disability (before age 70) or the removal or failure to reelect a participating director for reasons other than cause (as such term is defined in the plan). The benefit payable upon death or due to the director’s termination as a result of his removal or failure to be re-elected (other than for cause) decreases by $10,000 each year while the director remains in service. The following table outlines the Company-provided benefits to which our current directors would have been entitled under the deferred compensation plan as of December 31, 2010:
| Name |
Death Benefit/ Removal or Failure to Reelect for Reasons Other than Cause |
Disability | Change in Control | |||||||||
| Carlos S. Batista |
$ | 110,000 | $ | 150,000 | $ | 300,000 | ||||||
| Frederick A. Dlugokecki |
— | — | — | |||||||||
| Richard M. Famiglietti |
110,000 | 150,000 | 300,000 | |||||||||
| James A. Mengacci |
210,000 | 250,000 | 500,000 | |||||||||
| Jane H. Walsh |
40,000 | 70,000 | 140,000 | |||||||||
| Camilo P. Vieira |
110,000 | 150,000 | 300,000 | |||||||||
56
Table of Contents
| ITEM 11. | EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION |
Summary Compensation Table. The following table provides information concerning total compensation earned or paid to Naugatuck Valley Financial’s principal executive officer and the two other most highly compensated executives. These three officers are referred to as the “named executive officers” in this document.
| Name and Principal Position |
Year | Salary (1) | Bonus | Stock Awards |
Option Awards |
All
Other Compensation(2) |
Total | |||||||||||||||||||||
| John C. Roman |
2010 | $ | 179,293 | $ | 10,592 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 33,681 | $ | 223,566 | |||||||||||||||
| 2009 | 179,203 | — | — | — | 31,538 | 217,741 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Dominic J. Alegi, Jr |
2010 | 113,896 | 6,316 | — | — | 11,727 | 131,939 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| 2009 | 115,386 | — | — | — | 11,376 | 161,762 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Mark S. Graveline |
2010 | 150,300 | 4,909 | — | — | 11,512 | 166,721 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| 2009 | 142,559 | — | — | — | 12,332 | 154,891 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| (1) | There were 51 pay periods in 2010 as opposed to 53 in 2009. Salary for Mr. Graveline in 2010 includes $6,880 in payments under a deposit incentive program. |
| (2) | For Mr. Roman, 2010 amount includes, but is not limited to, allocations under the employee stock ownership plan, perquisites and personal benefits for automobile usage, automobile repairs and gas expenses. |
Employment Agreements. The Bank, the Company and Mr. Roman have entered into an employment agreement with a two-year term. The Boards of Directors may extend the term of the agreement for an additional year as of each anniversary of the effective date of the agreement. The Board of Directors last reviewed the employment agreement in October, 2010. At that time, the Boards of Directors extended the term of the agreement to November 20, 2012. The Boards of Directors review Mr. Roman’s base salary, currently $188,194, annually pursuant to the terms of the agreement. In addition to establishing a base salary for Mr. Roman, the agreement provides for, among other things, Mr. Roman’s participation in certain benefit plans, including stock-based benefit plans.
The employment agreement restricts Mr. Roman’s right to compete against the Bank for a period of one year following termination of his employment for good reason or other than for cause (as defined in the agreement). However, this provision does not apply if the Company and the Bank have not renewed the term of Mr. Roman’s employment agreement and his employment terminates at a time when the remaining term of the agreement is one year or less.
See “Other Potential Post-Termination Benefits” for a discussion of the benefits and payments Mr. Roman may receive under his employment agreement upon his retirement or termination of employment.
Naugatuck Valley Savings has entered into change in control agreements with Messrs. Alegi and Graveline. Naugatuck Valley Financial acts as a guarantor with respect to any payments due under the agreements. The agreements have a three year term and each year the Board of Directors of Naugatuck Valley Savings may extend the agreements for an additional year. The current terms of the agreements expire on November 20, 2013. Following the offering, we will enter into new change in control agreements with Messrs. Alegi and Graveline to
57
Table of Contents
reflect the changes in our corporate structure. See “Other Potential Post-Termination Benefits” for a discussion of the payments and benefits Messrs. Alegi and Graveline may receive in connection with a change in control.
The 2010 Valley Incentive Plan. The Valley Incentive Plan is intended to provide a cash compensation program that is competitive in level and form, to reward officers at the level of assistant vice president and above for achieving budgeted profits and for outstanding performance in furthering the goals of Naugatuck Valley Financial and its affiliates. If a participant is hired as an assistant vice president or promoted to an assistant vice president during a plan year the participant will receive a pro-rata share of the annual award (i.e. 1st Quarter – 75%, 2nd Quarter – 50%, 3rd Quarter – 25% and 4th Quarter – 0%). Participants have to be employed on December 31st to be eligible to receive an award and investment executives who participate in a commission plan are not eligible to participate in the Valley Incentive Plan.
The Valley Incentive Plan is administered by Naugatuck Valley Savings and Loan’s board of directors. Awards are determined based on Naugatuck Valley Financial’s net income after taxes (“NIAT”) and individual performance measures which are specific to each participant’s position and responsibilities with Naugatuck Valley Savings and Loan. 75% of a participant’s award depends upon the achievement of the targeted NIAT and 25% is based on individual performance goals. Participants are assigned an individual award target which, with salary, is intended to provide a competitive cash compensation level. This target is expressed as a percentage of salary as of the last day of the applicable Plan year. NIAT may be adjusted at the board’s discretion for unbudgeted acquisition expenses, additions to loan loss allowances and gains or losses on sales of investments. The board of directors revised the Valley Incentive Plan for the 2010 fiscal year to provide that no payments will be made if NIAT is less than $2.0 million.
Valley Incentive Plan payouts for any given plan year will be determined as of the end of each fiscal year and distributed in the pay period following the January board meeting. If a plan participant terminates employment with Naugatuck Valley Savings because of death or disability, the award will be pro-rated. If a participant is involuntarily terminated by Naugatuck Valley Savings, the board will determine the award, if any, under the Valley Incentive Plan. The Board of Directors approved disbursements for 2010 in accordance with the Valley Incentive Plan.
Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year End
The following table provides information concerning unexercised options and stock awards that have not vested for each named executive officer outstanding as of December 31, 2010.
| Name |
Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options Exercisable |
Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options Unexercisable |
Option Exercise Price |
Option Expiration Date |
Number of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested |
Market Value of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested (1) |
||||||||||||||||||
| John C. Roman |
37,000 | — | $ | 11.10 | 7/26/2015 | — | $ | — | ||||||||||||||||
| Dominic J. Alegi, Jr. |
22,000 | — | 11.10 | 7/26/2015 | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||
| Mark S. Graveline |
8,000 | — | 11.10 | 7/26/2015 | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||
| 400 | 600 | (2) | 11.10 | 7/26/2018 | 600 | (2) | 4,050 | |||||||||||||||||
| (1) | Based upon Naugatuck Valley Financial’s closing stock price of $6.75 on December 31, 2010. |
| (2) | Unexercisable stock options and restricted stock awards vest in three equal annual installments on July 26, 2011, 2012 and 2013. |
58
Table of Contents
Pension Benefits
Naugatuck Valley Savings participates in the Pentegra Defined Benefit Plan for Financial Institutions (the “Retirement Plan”) to provide retirement benefits for eligible employees. However, the accrual of benefits under the Retirement Plan was frozen as of September 1, 2005.
Other Potential Post-Termination Benefits
Payments Made Upon Termination for Cause. Mr. Roman’s employment agreement contains a narrow definition of cause for which we may terminate Mr. Roman’s employment. If we terminate Mr. Roman’s employment for cause, he will receive his base salary through the date of termination and retain the rights to any vested benefits subject to the terms of the plan or agreement under which we provide those benefits.
Payments Made Upon Voluntary Termination and Termination without Cause or for Good Reason. If we terminate Mr. Roman’s employment for reasons other than cause, or if he terminates his employment voluntarily under certain circumstances that constitute “good reason,” as defined in the employment agreement, we will pay Mr. Roman a lump sum cash payment equal to his base salary for the remaining term of the employment agreement, as well as the value of benefits he would have received under tax-qualified and non-tax-qualified benefit plans for the remaining term of the agreement, based on the amounts received under those arrangements during the 12 months preceding his termination. Mr. Roman is also entitled to continued medical, dental, life and disability insurance coverage for the remaining term of the agreement.
If Mr. Roman voluntarily terminates his employment under circumstances that would not constitute good reason, he will receive only his base salary through the date of termination and retain the rights to any vested benefits subject to the terms of the plan or agreement under which we provide those benefits.
Payments Made Upon Disability. If Mr. Roman becomes disabled, he will receive monthly disability pay equal to 75% of his base salary for a period ending on the earliest to occur of: (1) his return to full-time employment with Naugatuck Valley Savings; (2) his death; or (3) the attainment of age 65. We will also provide Mr. Roman (and his covered dependents) continued medical, dental and life insurance coverage for the applicable disability period. Disability benefits under the employment agreement are reduced by payments made to Mr. Roman under any other company or bank-sponsored disability program.
Messrs. Roman, Alegi and Graveline are participants in the Naugatuck Valley Financial Corporation 2005 Equity Incentive Plan. The plan provides that upon termination due to disability, outstanding stock options and restricted stock awards automatically vest and become exercisable and, in the case of options, remain exercisable until the later of one year from the date of disability or the expiration date of the stock options.
Payments Made Upon Death. Upon Mr. Roman’s death, his employment agreement terminates and his estate receives only unpaid compensation through the last day of the month of his death.
Naugatuck Valley Savings has entered into death benefit agreements with Messrs. Roman and Alegi. Under Mr. Roman’s agreement, Mr. Roman’s beneficiary becomes entitled to a single lump sum payment of $193,000 upon Mr. Roman’s death while still an employee of Naugatuck Valley Savings, or $25,000 upon Mr. Roman’s death at any other time. Under the agreement with Mr. Alegi, the executive’s beneficiary becomes entitled to a single lump sum payment of $25,000 upon his death at any time. In addition, under separate bank owned life insurance, the beneficiaries of Messrs. Roman, Alegi and Graveline become entitled to an additional lump sum payment of $25,000 upon the executive’s death at any time.
The Naugatuck Valley Financial Corporation 2005 Equity Incentive Plan provides that upon death, outstanding stock options and restricted stock awards automatically vest and become exercisable and, in the case of options, remain exercisable until the later of one year from the date of death or the expiration date of the stock options.
Payments Made Upon a Change in Control. Under Mr. Roman’s employment agreement, if he is involuntarily or constructively terminated within three years of a change in control, as defined in the employment
59
Table of Contents
agreement, we (or our successor) will pay him a severance payment equal to three times his average annual compensation (as defined in the employment agreement) over the five preceding calendar years, as well as provide him with continued medical, dental, life insurance and disability insurance for three years following termination of employment.
Under the change in control agreements, if Naugatuck Valley Savings (or our successor) terminates the executive’s employment for any reason other than cause (as defined in the agreements) or if the executive terminates his employment for “good reason,” in either case within three years of a change in control (as defined in the agreements), Naugatuck Valley Savings (or our successor) will pay the executive a lump sum cash payment equal to three times his average annual taxable income for the fix taxable years ending with the year before the year in which the change in control occurs. In addition, we will continue health and welfare insurance coverage for the executive for 36 months. Under the agreements, the executives generally have the ability to terminate their employment for “good reason” if (i) we assign them duties inconsistent with their positions, (ii) we materially reduce their base salaries, (iii) we relocate their office more than 25 miles, (iv) we take action that materially adversely affects their overall compensation and benefits package (unless the changes are non-discriminatory and affect substantially all employees), (v) our successor does not agree to assume the obligations under the change in control agreements.
Section 280G of the Internal Revenue Code provides that payments related to a change in control that equal or exceed three times the individual’s “base amount” (defined as average annual taxable compensation over the five preceding taxable years) constitute “excess parachute payments.” Section 4999 of the Code imposes an excise tax on certain individuals who receive excess parachute payments. Section 280G of the Code limits the deductibility to the employer of those same payments. The employment agreement and change in control agreements provide that, if necessary, the payments under the agreements will be reduced so that none of the payments constitute excess parachute payments.
The Naugatuck Valley Financial Corporation 2005 Equity Incentive Plan provides that, in the event of a change in control of Naugatuck Valley Financial or Naugatuck Valley Savings, outstanding stock options and stock awards automatically vest and become exercisable and, in the case of options, if the executive’s employment is involuntarily or constructively terminated remain exercisable for the remaining term of the option.
2005 Equity Incentive Plan
The Naugatuck Valley Financial Corporation 2005 Equity Incentive Plan was adopted by our board of directors and approved by our shareholders in May 2005. The 2005 Equity Incentive Plan authorized the granting of up to 372,614 stock options and 149,045 shares of restricted stock. The purpose of the 2005 Equity Incentive Plan is to promote Naugatuck Valley Financial’s success by linking the personal interests of its employees, officers and directors to those of Naugatuck Valley Financial’s stockholders, and by providing participants with an incentive for outstanding performance. The 2005 Equity Incentive Plan is further intended to provide flexibility to Naugatuck Valley Financial in its ability to motivate, attract, and retain the services of employees, officers and directors upon whose judgment, interest, and special effort the successful conduct of Naugatuck Valley Financial’s operation is largely dependent. The 2005 Equity Incentive Plan is administered by the Compensation Committee of Naugatuck Valley Financial’s board of directors, which has the authority to determine the eligible directors or employees to whom awards are to be granted, the number of awards to be granted, the vesting of the awards and the conditions and limitations of the awards.
As of December 31, 2010, options for 326,300 shares were outstanding and options for 46,074 shares remained available for future awards under the plan. Of the options granted under the plan, 240 have been exercised. As of December 31, 2010, 145,722 shares of restricted stock had been granted and 3,323 shares remained available for future awards under the plan.
The 2005 Equity Incentive Plan provides that in the event any merger, consolidation, share exchange or other similar corporate transaction affects the shares of Naugatuck Valley Financial in such a manner that an adjustment is required to preserve the benefits available under the plan, the committee administering the plan has the authority to adjust the number of shares which may be granted, the number of shares subject to restricted stock awards or outstanding stock options, and the exercise price of any stock option grant.
60
Table of Contents
Equity Compensation Plan Information
The following table sets forth information as of December 31, 2010 about Company common stock that may be issued under the Naugatuck Valley Financial Corporation 2005 Equity Incentive Plan. The plan was approved by the Company’s stockholders.
| PLAN CATEGORY |
Number of securities to be issued upon the exercise of outstanding options, warrants and rights |
Weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options, warrants and rights |
Number of
securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans (excluding securities reflected in the first column) |
|||||||||
| Equity compensation plans approved by security holders |
353,430 | $ | 11.13 | 20,777 | ||||||||
| Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders |
n/a | n/a | n/a | |||||||||
| Total |
353,430 | $ | 11.13 | 20,777 | ||||||||
| ITEM 12. | SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDERS MATTERS |
The following table provides information as of March 7, 2011 about the persons and entities known to Naugatuck Valley Financial to be the beneficial owners of more than 5% of the Company’s outstanding common stock. A person or entity may be considered to beneficially own any shares of common stock over which the person or entity has, directly or indirectly, sole or shared voting or investing power.
| Name and Address |
Number of Shares Owned |
Percent of Common Stock Outstanding (1) |
||||||
| Naugatuck Valley Mutual Holding Company (2) 333 Church Street Naugatuck, Connecticut 06770 |
4,182,407 | 59.6 | % | |||||
| (1) | Based on 7,018,823 shares of the Company’s common stock outstanding and entitled to vote as of March 7, 2011. |
| (2) | The members of the board of directors of Naugatuck Valley Financial and Naugatuck Valley Savings also constitute the board of directors of Naugatuck Valley Mutual Holding Company. |
The following table provides information as of March 7, 2011 about the shares of Naugatuck Valley Financial common stock that may be considered to be beneficially owned by each director, named executive officer listed in the Summary Compensation Table, executives who and all directors and executive officers of the Company as a group. A person may be considered to beneficially own any shares of common stock over which he or she has, directly or indirectly, sole or shared voting or investment power. Unless otherwise indicated, none of the shares listed are pledged as security and each of the named individuals has sole voting power and sole investment power with respect to the number of shares shown.
61
Table of Contents
| Name |
Number of Shares Owned (1)(2) |
Number of Shares That May Be Acquired within 60 Days of Exercising Options |
Total | Percent of Common Stock Outstanding (3) |
||||||||||||
| Directors: |
||||||||||||||||
| Carlos S. Batista |
24,066 | (4) | 18,630 | 42,696 | * | |||||||||||
| Frederick A. Dlugokecki |
— | — | — | * | ||||||||||||
| Richard M. Famiglietti |
14,834 | 18,630 | 33,464 | * | ||||||||||||
| James A. Mengacci |
13,658 | (5) | 18,630 | 32,288 | * | |||||||||||
| John C. Roman |
36,184 | 37,000 | 73,184 | * | ||||||||||||
| Camilo P. Vieira |
8,907 | (6) | 18,630 | 27,537 | * | |||||||||||
| Jane H. Walsh |
22,391 | 22,000 | 44,391 | * | ||||||||||||
| Executive Officers Who Are Not Directors: |
||||||||||||||||
| Dominic J. Alegi, Jr. |
25,625 | (7) | 22,000 | 47,625 | * | |||||||||||
| Mark S. Graveline |
6,792 | 8,400 | 15,192 | * | ||||||||||||
| William C. Nimons |
39,527 | (8) | 18,000 | 57,527 | * | |||||||||||
| Lee R. Schlesinger |
15,276 | 10,200 | 25,476 | * | ||||||||||||
| All directors and executive officers as a group (11 persons) |
207,260 | 158,820 | 366,080 | 5.1 | % | |||||||||||
| * | Less than 1.0%. |
| (1) | Includes shares of unvested restricted stock held in trust as part of the Naugatuck Valley Financial Corporation 2005 Equity Incentive Plan with respect to which individuals have voting but not investment power as follows: Mr. Graveline—600 shares and Mr. Schlesinger—1,200 shares. |
| (2) | Includes shares allocated to the accounts of individuals under the Bank’s ESOP with respect to which individuals have voting but not investment power as follows: Mr. Alegi—3,409 shares, Mr. Graveline—2,274 shares, Mr. Nimons—3,080 shares, Mr. Roman—5,348 shares, Mr. Schlesinger—2,505 shares and Ms. Walsh—1,335 shares. |
| (3) | Based on 7,018,823 shares of the Company’s common stock outstanding and entitled to vote as of March 7, 2011. |
| (4) | Includes 300 shares held in three custodian accounts for Mr. Batista’s grandchildren. |
| (5) | Includes 6,360 shares that are pledged as collateral for a third party loan. |
| (6) | Includes 1,839 shares held in Mr. Vieira’s spouse’s individual retirement account. |
| (7) | Includes 100 shares held by Mr. Alegi’s spouse and 450 shares held in custodian accounts for Mr. Alegi’s grandchildren. |
| (8) | Includes 500 shares held by Mr. Nimons’ spouse and 9,740 shares held in Mr. Nimons’ spouse’s individual retirement account. |
| (b) | Security Ownership of Management |
Information required by this item is incorporated herein by reference to Item 12(a) of this Annual Report on Form 10-K
| (c) | Changes in Control |
Management of Naugatuck Valley Financial knows of no arrangements, including any pledge by any person or securities of Naugatuck Valley Financial, the operation of which may at a subsequent date result in a change in control of the registrant.
| (d) | Equity Compensation Plan Information |
The following table sets forth information as of December 31, 2010 about Company common stock that may be issued under the Naugatuck Valley Financial Corporation 2005 Equity Incentive Plan. The plan was approved by the Company’s stockholders.
62
Table of Contents
| PLAN CATEGORY |
Number of securities to be issued upon the exercise of outstanding options, warrants and rights |
Weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options, warrants and rights |
Number of
securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans (excluding securities reflected in the first column) |
|||||||||
| Equity compensation plans approved by security holders |
353,430 | $ | 11.13 | 20,777 | ||||||||
| Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders |
n/a | n/a | n/a | |||||||||
| Total |
353,430 | $ | 11.13 | 20,777 | ||||||||
| ITEM 13. | CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE |
Transactions with Related Persons
The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 generally prohibits loans by Naugatuck Valley Financial to its executive officers and directors. However, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act contains a specific exemption from such prohibition for loans by Naugatuck Valley Savings and Loan to its executive officers and directors in compliance with federal banking regulations. Federal regulations require that all loans or extensions of credit to executive officers and directors of insured financial institutions must be made on substantially the same terms, including interest rates and collateral, as those prevailing at the time for comparable transactions with other persons and must not involve more than the normal risk of repayment or present other unfavorable features. Naugatuck Valley Savings and Loan is therefore prohibited from making any new loans or extensions of credit to executive officers and directors at different rates or terms than those offered to the general public. Notwithstanding this rule, federal regulations permit Naugatuck Valley Savings and Loan to make loans to executive officers and directors at reduced interest rates if the loan is made under a benefit program generally available to all other employees and does not give preference to any executive officer or director over any other employee, although Naugatuck Valley Savings and Loan does not currently have such a program in place. At December 31, 2010, all Naugatuck Valley Savings and Loan loans to related persons (as defined under Securities and Exchange Commission rules) were made in the ordinary course of business, made on substantially the same terms, including interest rates and collateral, as those prevailing at the time for comparable loans with persons not related to the lender and did not involve more than the normal risk of collectibility or present other unfavorable features.
Pursuant to Naugatuck Valley Financial’s Audit Committee Charter, the Audit Committee periodically reviews, no less frequently than quarterly, a summary of Naugatuck Valley Financial’s transactions with directors and executive officers of Naugatuck Valley Financial and with firms that employ directors, as well as any other related person transactions, to recommend to the disinterested members of the board of directors that the transactions are fair, reasonable and within Naugatuck Valley Financial policy and should be ratified and approved. Also, in accordance with banking regulations and its policy, the board of directors reviews all loans made to a director or executive officer in an amount that, when aggregated with the amount of all other loans to such person and his or her related interests, exceed the greater of $25,000 or 5% of Naugatuck Valley Financial’s capital and surplus (up to a maximum of $500,000) and such loan must be approved in advance by a majority of the disinterested members of the board of directors. Additionally, pursuant to Naugatuck Valley Financial’s Code of Ethics and Business Conduct, all executive officers and directors of Naugatuck Valley Financial must disclose any existing or potential conflicts of interest to the President and Chief Executive Officer of Naugatuck Valley Financial. Such potential conflicts of interest include, but are not limited to, the following: (1) Naugatuck Valley Financial conducting business with or competing against an organization in which a family member of an executive officer or director has an ownership or employment interest and (2) the ownership of more than 5% of the outstanding securities or 5% of total assets of any business entity that does business with or is in competition with Naugatuck Valley Financial.
63
Table of Contents
Policies and Procedures for Approval of Related Persons Transactions
Naugatuck Valley Financial maintains a Policy and Procedures Governing Related Persons Transactions, which is a written policy and set of procedures for the review and approval or ratification of transactions involving related persons. Under the policy, related persons consist of directors, director nominees, executive officers, persons or entities known to us to be the beneficial owner of more than five percent of any outstanding class of voting securities of Naugatuck Valley Financial, or immediate family members or certain affiliated entities of any of the foregoing persons.
Transactions covered by the policy consist of any financial transaction, arrangement or relationship or series of similar transactions, arrangements or relationships, in which:
| • | the aggregate amount involved will or may be expected to exceed $50,000 in any calendar year; |
| • | Naugatuck Valley Financial is, will or may be expected to be a participant; and |
| • | any related person has or will have a direct or indirect material interest. |
The policy excludes certain transactions, including:
| • | any compensation paid to an executive officer of Naugatuck Valley Financial if the compensation committee of the board of directors approved (or recommended that the Board approve) such compensation; |
| • | any compensation paid to a director of Naugatuck Valley Financial if the Board or an authorized committee of the Board approved such compensation; and |
| • | any transaction with a related person involving consumer and investor financial products and services provided in the ordinary course of Naugatuck Valley Financial business and on substantially the same terms as those prevailing at the time for comparable services provided to unrelated third parties or to Naugatuck Valley Financial’s employees on a broad basis (and, in the case of loans, in compliance with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002). |
Related person transactions will be approved or ratified by the Audit Committee. In determining whether to approve or ratify a related person transaction, the Audit Committee will consider all relevant factors, including:
| • | whether the terms of the proposed transaction are at least as favorable to Naugatuck Valley Financial as those that might be achieved with an unaffiliated third party; |
| • | the size of the transaction and the amount of consideration payable to the related person; |
| • | the nature of the interest of the related person; |
| • | whether the transaction may involve a conflict of interest; and |
| • | whether the transaction involves the provision of goods and services to Naugatuck Valley Financial that are available from unaffiliated third parties. |
A member of the Audit Committee who has an interest in the transaction will abstain from voting on the approval of the transaction but may, if so requested by the Chair of the Audit Committee, participate in some or all of the discussion relating to the transaction.
Director Independence
The Company’s Board of Directors currently consists of seven members, all of whom are independent under the listing requirements of the NASDAQ Stock Market, except for Mr. Roman, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company and the Bank. In determining the independence of its directors, the Board considered transactions, relationships and arrangements between the Company and its directors that are not required to be disclosed in this Annual Report on Form 10-K under the heading “Transactions with Related Persons,” including loans or lines of credit that the Bank has directly or indirectly made to Directors Famiglietti and Walsh.
64
Table of Contents
| ITEM 14. | PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES |
Audit Fees
The following table sets forth the fees billed to the Company for the fiscal years ending December 31, 2010 and 2009 by Whittlesey & Hadley, P.C.:
| 2010 | 2009 | |||||||
| Audit fees(1) |
$ | 91,500 | $ | 107,500 | ||||
| Audit related fees(2) |
25,000 | 14,000 | ||||||
| Tax fees(3) |
12,000 | 12,325 | ||||||
| All other fees(4) |
87,800 | 13,101 | ||||||
| (1) | Consists of fees for professional services rendered for the audit of the consolidated financial statements and the review of financial statements included in quarterly reports on Form 10-Q. |
| (2) | Consists of fees for audits of the Company’s 401(k) and ESOP plans in 2010 and for the Company’s 401(k) plan in 2009. |
| (3) | Consists of fees for tax return preparation, planning and tax advice. |
| (4) | For 2010 and 2009, consists of fees related to merger and acquisition activities. |
Policy on Pre-Approval of Audit and Permissible Non-Audit Services
The Audit Committee is responsible for appointing and setting compensation and overseeing the work of the independent public accountant. In accordance with its charter, the Audit Committee approves, in advance, all audit and permissible non-audit services to be performed by the independent public accountant to ensure that the independent public accountant does not provide any non-audit services to the Company that are prohibited by law or regulation.
In addition, the Audit Committee has established a policy regarding pre-approval of all audit and permissible non-audit services provided by the independent public accountant. Requests for approval of services by the independent public accountant under the auditor services policy must be specific as to the particular services to be provided. The request may be made with respect to either specific services or a type of service for predictable or recurring services.
During the year ended December 31, 2010, all services provided by the independent public accountant were approved, in advance, by the Audit Committee in compliance with these procedures.
65
Table of Contents
PART IV
| ITEM 15. | EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES. |
| (1) | The financial statements required in response to this item are incorporated by reference from Item 8 of this report. |
| (2) | All financial statement schedules are omitted because they are not required or applicable, or the required information is shown in the consolidated financial statements or the notes thereto. |
| (3) | Exhibits |
| Exhibit No. |
Description | |
| 2.1 | Plan of Conversion and Reorganization, dated February 22, 2010 (1) | |
| 2.2 | Mutual Termination Agreement by and among Naugatuck Valley Financial Corporation, a federal chartered subsidiary holding company, Naugatuck Valley Financial Corporation, a Maryland corporation, and Southern Connecticut Bancorp, Inc., a Connecticut corporation, dated November 12, 2010 (2) | |
| 3.1 | Charter of Naugatuck Valley Financial Corporation (3) | |
| 3.2 | Bylaws of Naugatuck Valley Financial Corporation (4) | |
| 4.0 | Specimen Stock Certificate of Naugatuck Valley Financial Corporation (5) | |
| 10.1 | Naugatuck Valley Financial Corporation and Naugatuck Valley Savings Employment Agreement with John C. Roman (6)* | |
| 10.2 | Naugatuck Valley Savings Change in Control Agreement with Dominic J. Alegi, Jr. (6) * | |
| 10.3 | Naugatuck Valley Financial Corporation and Naugatuck Valley Savings Deferred Compensation Plan for Directors (7)* | |
| 10.4 | Form of Naugatuck Valley Savings Employee Severance Compensation Plan (5)* | |
| 10.5 | Naugatuck Valley Savings Death Benefit Agreement with John C. Roman, as amended (5)* | |
| 10.6 | Naugatuck Valley Savings Death Benefit Agreement with Dominic J. Alegi, Jr. (5)* | |
| 10.7 | Naugatuck Valley Financial Corporation 2005 Equity Incentive Plan (8)* | |
| 10.8 | Naugatuck Valley Savings Change in Control Agreement with Mark S. Graveline (9)* | |
| 14.0 | Code of Ethics and Business Conduct (10) | |
| 21.0 | List of Subsidiaries | |
| 23.0 | Consent of Whittlesey & Hadley, P.C. | |
| 31.1 | Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Chief Executive Officer | |
| 31.2 | Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Chief Financial Officer | |
| 32.0 | Section 1350 Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer | |
| * | Management contract or compensation plan arrangement |
| (1) | Incorporated by reference to the Exhibits filed to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed February 23, 2010. |
| (2) | Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on November 15, 2010. |
| (3) | Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Form 10-Q for the three months ended September 30, 2004. |
| (4) | Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on October 18, 2007. |
| (5) | Incorporated by reference to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1, as amended, initially filed on June 18, 2004. |
| (6) | Incorporated by reference to the Company’s Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007. |
| (7) | Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2007, filed on May 15, 2007. |
| (8) | Incorporated by reference to Appendix C to the Proxy Statement for the 2005 Annual Meeting of Stockholders filed on April 1, 2005. |
| (9) | Incorporated by reference to the Company’s Form 10-K for the fiscal year end December 31, 2008. |
| (10) | Incorporated by reference to the Company’s Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004. |
66
Table of Contents
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To The Board of Directors and Shareholders
Naugatuck Valley Financial Corporation
We have audited the accompanying consolidated statements of financial condition of Naugatuck Valley Financial Corporation (the “Company”) and subsidiary as of December 31, 2010 and 2009, and the related consolidated statements of income, changes in stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Companies Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Naugatuck Valley Financial Corporation and subsidiary at December 31, 2010 and 2009, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the each of the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
Hartford, Connecticut
March 9, 2011
F - 1
Table of Contents
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
| December 31, | ||||||||
| 2010 | 2009 | |||||||
| ASSETS |
||||||||
| Cash and due from depository institutions |
$ | 11,686 | $ | 9,003 | ||||
| Investment in federal funds |
2,577 | 3,143 | ||||||
| Investment securities available-for-sale, at fair value |
31,683 | 37,623 | ||||||
| Investment securities held-to-maturity, at amortized cost |
15,334 | 1,451 | ||||||
| Loans held for sale |
81 | — | ||||||
| Loans receivable, net |
473,521 | 473,304 | ||||||
| Accrued income receivable |
1,979 | 2,074 | ||||||
| Foreclosed real estate and repossessed assets, net |
421 | 140 | ||||||
| Premises and equipment, net |
9,612 | 9,948 | ||||||
| Bank owned life insurance |
9,248 | 8,920 | ||||||
| Federal Home Loan Bank of Boston stock, at cost |
6,252 | 6,252 | ||||||
| Other assets |
5,859 | 5,097 | ||||||
| Total assets |
$ | 568,253 | $ | 556,955 | ||||
| LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY |
||||||||
| Liabilities |
||||||||
| Deposits |
$ | 405,875 | $ | 380,931 | ||||
| Borrowed funds |
102,842 | 118,984 | ||||||
| Mortgagors’ escrow accounts |
4,832 | 4,888 | ||||||
| Other liabilities |
2,444 | 1,844 | ||||||
| Total liabilities |
515,993 | 506,647 | ||||||
| Commitments and contingencies |
||||||||
| Stockholders’ equity |
||||||||
| Preferred stock, $.01 par value; 1,000,000 shares authorized; no shares issued or outstanding |
— | — | ||||||
| Common stock, $.01 par value; 25,000,000 shares authorized; 7,604,375 shares issued; shares outstanding—7,018,823 at December 31, 2010; 7,022,866 at December 31, 2009 |
76 | 76 | ||||||
| Paid-in capital |
33,786 | 33,756 | ||||||
| Retained earnings |
25,986 | 24,849 | ||||||
| Unearned ESOP shares (173,846 shares at December 31, 2010 and 193,735 shares at December 31, 2009) |
(1,738 | ) | (1,937 | ) | ||||
| Unearned stock awards (2,900 shares at December 31, 2010 and 32,340 shares at December 31, 2009) |
(29 | ) | (355 | ) | ||||
| Treasury Stock, at cost (588,875 shares at December 31, 2010 and 583,342 shares at December 31, 2009) |
(6,176 | ) | (6,132 | ) | ||||
| Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) |
355 | 51 | ||||||
| Total stockholders’ equity |
52,260 | 50,308 | ||||||
| Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity |
$ | 568,253 | $ | 556,955 | ||||
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
F - 2
Table of Contents
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
| For the Years Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
| 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | ||||||||||
| Interest and dividend income |
||||||||||||
| Interest on loans |
$ | 26,820 | $ | 25,954 | $ | 24,556 | ||||||
| Interest and dividends on investments and deposits |
1,718 | 2,337 | 3,647 | |||||||||
| Total interest income |
28,538 | 28,291 | 28,203 | |||||||||
| Interest expense |
||||||||||||
| Interest on deposits |
7,297 | 8,477 | 9,271 | |||||||||
| Interest on borrowed funds |
2,982 | 4,060 | 4,633 | |||||||||
| Total interest expense |
10,279 | 12,537 | 13,904 | |||||||||
| Net interest income |
18,259 | 15,754 | 14,299 | |||||||||
| Provision for loan losses |
3,360 | 1,144 | 675 | |||||||||
| Net interest income after provision for loan losses |
14,899 | 14,610 | 13,624 | |||||||||
| Noninterest income |
||||||||||||
| Fees for services related to deposit accounts |
970 | 1,060 | 1,053 | |||||||||
| Mortgage banking fees |
945 | 20 | 23 | |||||||||
| Fees for other services |
730 | 554 | 506 | |||||||||
| Income from bank owned life insurance |
327 | 341 | 315 | |||||||||
| Income from investment advisory services, net |
182 | 271 | 299 | |||||||||
| Gain (loss) on investments |
11 | 388 | (3,398 | ) | ||||||||
| Other income |
123 | 108 | 154 | |||||||||
| Total noninterest income (loss) |
3,288 | 2,742 | (1,048 | ) | ||||||||
| Noninterest expense |
||||||||||||
| Compensation, taxes and benefits |
8,379 | 7,692 | 7,521 | |||||||||
| Office occupancy |
2,348 | 2,151 | 2,173 | |||||||||
| Computer processing |
926 | 916 | 861 | |||||||||
| Costs related to terminated merger |
782 | 241 | — | |||||||||
| FDIC insurance premiums |
681 | 946 | 132 | |||||||||
| Directors compensation |
565 | 560 | 493 | |||||||||
| Professional fees |
461 | 433 | 518 | |||||||||
| Advertising |
344 | 330 | 534 | |||||||||
| Office supplies |
211 | 207 | 195 | |||||||||
| Loss on foreclosed real estate, net |
107 | 36 | 1 | |||||||||
| Public company expenses |
87 | 78 | 80 | |||||||||
| Other expenses |
1,016 | 951 | 946 | |||||||||
| Total noninterest expense |
15,907 | 14,541 | 13,454 | |||||||||
| Income (loss) before tax provision (benefit) |
2,280 | 2,811 | (878 | ) | ||||||||
| Income tax provision (benefit) |
829 | 818 | (566 | ) | ||||||||
| Net income (loss) |
$ | 1,451 | $ | 1,993 | $ | (312 | ) | |||||
| Earnings (loss) per share—basic and diluted |
$ | 0.21 | $ | 0.29 | $ | (0.05 | ) | |||||
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
F - 3
Table of Contents
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
| Common Stock |
Paid-in Capital |
Retained Earnings |
Unearned ESOP Shares |
Unearned Stock Awards |
Treasury Stock |
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) |
Total | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Balance at December 31, 2008 |
$ | 76 | $ | 33,637 | $ | 23,303 | $ | (2,136 | ) | $ | (680 | ) | $ | (6,107 | ) | $ | (2,504 | ) | $ | 45,589 | ||||||||||||
| ESOP shares released—19,889 shares |
— | (87 | ) | — | 199 | — | — | — | 112 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Dividends paid ($0.17 per common share) |
— | — | (447 | ) | — | — | — | — | (447 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Stock based compensation—29,440 shares vested |
— | — | — | — | 325 | — | — | 325 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Stock based compensation—options |
— | 206 | — | — | — | — | — | 206 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Treasury stock acquired—4,028 shares |
— | — | — | — | — | (25 | ) | — | (25 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Comprehensive income: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Net income |
— | — | 1,993 | — | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Net change in unrealized holding gain on available-for-sale securities, net of tax effect |
2,555 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Comprehensive income |
4,548 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Balance at December 31, 2009 |
76 | 33,756 | 24,849 | (1,937 | ) | (355 | ) | (6,132 | ) | 51 | 50,308 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| ESOP shares released—19,889 shares |
— | (76 | ) | — | 199 | — | — | — | 123 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Dividends paid ($0.12 per common share) |
— | — | (317 | ) | — | — | — | — | (317 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Stock based compensation—27,950 shares vested |
— | — | — | — | 309 | — | — | 309 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Stock based compensation—1,490 shares forfeited |
— | — | 3 | — | 17 | (20 | ) | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Stock based compensation—options |
— | 106 | — | — | — | — | — | 106 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Treasury stock acquired—4,043 shares |
— | — | — | — | — | (24 | ) | — | (24 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Comprehensive income: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Net income |
— | — | 1,451 | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Net change in unrealized holding gain on available-for-sale securities, net of tax effect |
304 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Comprehensive income |
1,755 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Balance at December 31, 2010 |
$ | 76 | $ | 33,786 | $ | 25,986 | $ | (1,738 | ) | (29 | ) | $ | (6,176 | ) | $ | 355 | $ | 52,260 | ||||||||||||||
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
F - 4
Table of Contents
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
| For the Years Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
| 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | ||||||||||
| Cash flows from operating activities |
||||||||||||
| Net income (loss) |
$ | 1,451 | $ | 1,993 | $ | (312 | ) | |||||
| Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by operating activities: |
||||||||||||
| Provision for loan losses |
3,360 | 1,144 | 675 | |||||||||
| Depreciation and amortization expense |
806 | 821 | 835 | |||||||||
| Loss on sale of assets |
2 | — | — | |||||||||
| Gain on sale of loans |
(533 | ) | — | — | ||||||||
| Loans originated for sale |
(36,897 | ) | — | — | ||||||||
| Proceeds from sale of loans |
37,510 | — | — | |||||||||
| Net amortization (accretion) from investments |
90 | 60 | 51 | |||||||||
| Amortization of intangible assets |
34 | 34 | 34 | |||||||||
| Provision for deferred tax (benefit) |
(464 | ) | 704 | (1,574 | ) | |||||||
| Loss (gain) on investment securities |
(11 | ) | (388 | ) | 3,398 | |||||||
| Stock-based compensation |
424 | 656 | 813 | |||||||||
| Net change in: |
||||||||||||
| Accrued income receivable |
95 | 25 | (65 | ) | ||||||||
| Deferred loan fees |
(82 | ) | (43 | ) | 68 | |||||||
| Cash surrender value of life insurance |
(327 | ) | (341 | ) | (315 | ) | ||||||
| Other assets |
(430 | ) | (2,291 | ) | (39 | ) | ||||||
| Other liabilities |
729 | 222 | (110 | ) | ||||||||
| Net cash provided by operating activities |
5,757 | 2,596 | 3,459 | |||||||||
| Cash flows from investing activities |
||||||||||||
| Proceeds from maturities and repayments of available-for-sale securities |
7,548 | 10,022 | 7,501 | |||||||||
| Proceeds from sale of available-for-sale securities |
7,775 | 19,264 | 13,171 | |||||||||
| Proceeds from sale of held-to-maturity securities |
— | 110 | — | |||||||||
| Proceeds from maturities of held-to-maturity securities |
1,016 | — | 1,190 | |||||||||
| Purchase of available-for-sale securities |
(8,996 | ) | — | (25,017 | ) | |||||||
| Purchase of held-to-maturity securities |
(14,945 | ) | (1,566 | ) | — | |||||||
| Loan originations net of principal payments |
(4,260 | ) | (42,570 | ) | (72,888 | ) | ||||||
| Purchase of Federal Home Loan Bank of Boston stock |
— | — | (1,619 | ) | ||||||||
| Purchase of property and equipment |
(488 | ) | (212 | ) | (775 | ) | ||||||
| Proceeds from the sale of other real estate owned |
323 | — | — | |||||||||
| Net cash used by investing activities |
(12,027 | ) | (14,952 | ) | (78,437 | ) | ||||||
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
F - 5
Table of Contents
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS—(Continued)
| For the Years Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
| 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | ||||||||||
| Cash flows from financing activities |
||||||||||||
| Net change in time deposits |
7,501 | (3,859 | ) | 33,353 | ||||||||
| Net change in other deposit accounts |
17,442 | 21,764 | 8,275 | |||||||||
| Advances from Federal Home Loan Bank of Boston |
24,900 | 52,550 | 55,915 | |||||||||
| Repayment of Advances from Federal Home Loan Bank of Boston |
(41,548 | ) | (58,418 | ) | (22,373 | ) | ||||||
| Net change in mortgagors’ escrow accounts |
(56 | ) | 327 | 691 | ||||||||
| Change in short-term borrowings |
506 | 4,363 | 1,839 | |||||||||
| Common stock repurchased |
(44 | ) | (25 | ) | (2,231 | ) | ||||||
| Cash dividends to common stockholders |
(314 | ) | (447 | ) | (614 | ) | ||||||
| Net cash provided by financing activities |
8,387 | 16,255 | 74,855 | |||||||||
| Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
2,117 | 3,899 | (123 | ) | ||||||||
| Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year |
12,146 | 8,247 | 8,370 | |||||||||
| Cash and cash equivalents at end of year |
$ | 14,263 | $ | 12,146 | $ | 8,247 | ||||||
| Supplemental disclosures |
||||||||||||
| Non-cash investing activities: |
||||||||||||
| Transfer of loans to foreclosed assets |
$ | 604 | $ | 140 | $ | — | ||||||
| Cash paid during the year for: |
||||||||||||
| Interest |
$ | 10,318 | $ | 12,283 | $ | 13,950 | ||||||
| Income taxes |
1,450 | 286 | 943 | |||||||||
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
F - 6
Table of Contents
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
| 1. | Nature of Operations |
Naugatuck Valley Financial Corporation (the “Company”) was organized as a federal corporation at the direction of Naugatuck Valley Savings and Loan (the “Bank”) in connection with the mutual holding company reorganization of Naugatuck Valley Savings. The reorganization and initial public offering of Naugatuck Valley Financial was completed on September 30, 2004. In the offering, Naugatuck Valley Financial issued a majority of its outstanding shares of common stock to Naugatuck Valley Mutual Holding Company (the “MHC”), the mutual holding company parent of the Bank.
Originally organized in 1922, the Bank is a federally chartered stock savings bank which is headquartered in Naugatuck, Connecticut. The Bank provides a full range of personal banking services to individual and small business customers located primarily in the Naugatuck Valley and the immediate surrounding vicinity. It is subject to competition from other financial institutions throughout the region. The Bank is also subject to the regulations of various federal agencies and undergoes periodic examinations by those regulatory authorities.
The Bank owns the Naugatuck Valley Mortgage Servicing Corporation, which qualifies and operates as a Connecticut passive investment company pursuant to legislation.
| 2. | Basis of Presentation |
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company, the Bank and the Bank’s wholly-owned subsidiary, Naugatuck Valley Mortgage Servicing Corporation. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
In preparing the financial statements, management is required to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities as of the date of the balance sheet, and income and expenses for the period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Material estimates that are particularly susceptible to significant change in the near-term relate to the determination of the allowance for losses on loans and the valuation of real estate acquired in connection with foreclosure or in satisfaction of loans. While management uses available information to recognize losses on loans and foreclosed real estate, future additions to the allowance may be necessary based on changes in economic conditions, particularly in Connecticut.
Management has evaluated subsequent events for potential recognition or disclosure in the financial statements. No subsequent events were identified that would require a change to the financial statements. On January 14, 2011, the Company announced the intention to sell the approximate 60% ownership interest held by the MHC in the Company to the public. See Note 18 to these financial statements for additional disclosure regarding this event.
| 3. | Summary of Significant Accounting Policies |
The accounting and reporting policies of the Company and its subsidiary conform to generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America and to general practices within the thrift industry. Such policies have been followed on a consistent basis. The significant accounting policies of the Company are summarized below.
F - 7
Table of Contents
NAUGATUCK VALLEY FINANCIAL CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Investment securities
Investments are accounted for in accordance with the intent of management at the time of purchase. If management has the intent and the Company has the ability at the time of purchase to hold debt securities until maturity, they are classified as held-to-maturity. These securities are carried at historical cost adjusted for the amortization of premiums and accretion of discounts, which are recognized as adjustments to interest income.
Securities to be held for indefinite periods of time are classified as available-for-sale and are carried at fair value with unrealized gains and losses reported as a separate component of capital net of estimated income taxes. The Company has no securities held for trading.
Effective April 1, 2009, the Company adopted new accounting guidance related to recognition and presentation of other-than-temporary impairment. This accounting guidance amends the recognition guidance for other-than-temporary impairments of debt securities and expands the financial statement disclosures for other-than-temporary impairment losses on debt and equity securities. The guidance replaced the “intent and ability” indication in prior guidance by specifying that (a) if the Company does not have the intent to sell a debt security prior to recovery and (b) it is more likely-than-not that it will not have to sell the debt security prior to recovery, the security would not be considered other-than-temporarily impaired unless there is a credit loss. When the Company does not intend to sell the security, and it is more likely-than-not the Company will not have to sell the security before recovery of its cost basis, it will recognize the credit component of an other-than-temporary impairment of a debt security in earnings and the remaining portion in other comprehensive income. For held-to-maturity debt securities, the amount of an other-than temporary impairment recorded in other comprehensive income for the noncredit portion of a previous other-than-temporary impairment is amortized prospectively over the remaining life of the security on the basis of the timing of future estimated cash flows of the security.
The credit loss component recognized in earnings is identified as the amount of principal cash flows not expected to be received over the remaining term of the security as projected based on cash flow projections discounted at the applicable original yield of the security. The adoption of the other-than-temporary impairment accounting guidance had no impact on the Company’s financial statements.
Prior to the adoption of the accounting guidance on April 1, 2009, declines in the fair value of held-to-maturity and available-for-sale securities below their cost that were deemed to be other than temporary were reflected in earnings as realized losses. In estimating other-than-temporary impairment, management considers (1) the length of time and the extent to which the fair value has been less than cost, (2) the financial condition and near-term prospects of the issuer and (3) the intent and ability of the Company to retain its investment in the issuer for a period of time sufficient to allow for any anticipated recovery in fair value.
Gains or losses on the sales of securities are recognized at trade date utilizing the specific identification method. The sale of a held to maturity security within three months of its maturity date or after collection of at least 85% of the principal outstanding at the time the security was acquired is considered a maturity for purposes of classification and disclosure.
Transfers of debt securities into the held to maturity classification from the available for sale classification are made at fair value on the date of transfer. The unrealized holding gain or loss on the date of transfer is retained in accumulated other comprehensive income and in the carrying value of the held to maturity securities. Such amounts are amortized over the remaining contractual lives of the securities by the interest method.
F - 8
Table of Contents
NAUGATUCK VALLEY FINANCIAL CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Loans receivable and allowance for loan losses
Loans receivable are stated at unpaid principal balance less undistributed construction loans, deferred loan fees, and allowances for loan losses.
Uncollected interest on loans receivable is accrued as earned based on rates applied to principal amounts outstanding. Recognition of income on the accrual basis is discontinued when there is sufficient question as to the collectibility of the interest. In these cases, the interest previously accrued to income is reversed, and the loans are placed on the cash basis. The interest on these loans is accounted for on the cash-basis method until qualifying for return to accrual status. Loans are returned to accrual status when all the principal and interest amounts contractually due are brought current and future payments are reasonably assured. For certain loans which are deemed to be impaired and for which the collection of the entire principal balance is in doubt, any payments received from the borrower or operation of the collateral will be applied only to principal and no income will be recognized.
Loan origination fees and certain direct loan origination costs are being deferred and the net amount amortized on a level-yield basis as an adjustment to the related loan yield over its contractual life. Unamortized net fees are recognized upon early repayment of the loans.
The allowance for loan losses is established by a provision charged to earnings and is maintained at a level considered adequate to provide for probable loan losses based on management’s evaluation of known and inherent risks in the loan portfolio. When a loan or portion of a loan is considered uncollectible, it is charged against the allowance for loan losses. Recoveries of loans previously charged-off are credited to the allowance when collected.
Management makes regular evaluations of the loan portfolio to determine the adequacy of the level of the allowance for loan losses. Numerous factors are considered in the evaluation, including a review of certain borrowers’ current financial status and credit standing, available collateral, loss experience in relation to outstanding loans, the overall loan portfolio quality, management’s judgment regarding prevailing and anticipated economic conditions, and other relevant factors.
In addition, various regulatory agencies, as an integral part of their examination process, periodically review the Bank’s allowance for loan losses. Such agencies may require the Bank to recognize additions to the allowance based on their judgments about information available to them at the time of their examination.
Loan sales and mortgage-servicing rights
Residential mortgage loans originated and held for sale are classified separately in the consolidated statement of financial condition and reported at the lower of amortized cost or market value (based on secondary market prices). At December 31, 2010, loans held for sale approximated $81,000. There were no loans held for sale at December 31, 2009. Gains or losses on the sale of loans are determined using the specific identification method.
The Bank sells residential mortgage loans with servicing rights retained. At the time of the sale, the Bank determines the value of the retained servicing rights, which represents the present value of the differential between the contractual servicing fee and adequate compensation, defined as the fee a sub-servicer would require to assume the role of servicer, after considering the estimated effects of prepayments. If material, a portion of the gain on the sale of the loan is recognized as due to the value of the servicing rights, and a servicing asset is recorded. During 2010, the Bank recorded a servicing asset as a result of sales of approximately $36 million of loans in the secondary mortgage markets.
F - 9
Table of Contents
NAUGATUCK VALLEY FINANCIAL CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
The Bank has engaged an independent third party to perform the servicing rights analysis on a quarterly basis. The cost basis of loan servicing rights is amortized on a level yield basis over the period of estimated net servicing revenue and such amortization is included in the consolidated statement of income as a reduction of loan servicing fee income. Servicing rights are evaluated for impairment by comparing their aggregate carrying amount to their fair value. The fair value of loan servicing rights is estimated using a present value cash flow model. The most important assumptions used in the valuation model are the anticipated rate of loan prepayments and discount rates. All assumptions are based on standards used by market participants. Impairment is recognized as an adjustment to loan and servicing income.
Foreclosed real estate
Real estate properties acquired through loan foreclosure and other partial or total satisfaction of problem loans are carried at the lower of fair value or the related loan balance at the date of foreclosure. Losses arising at the time of acquisition of such properties are charged against the allowance for loan losses.
Valuations are periodically performed by management and an allowance for losses is established if the carrying value of a property subsequently exceeds its fair value less estimated disposal costs. Subsequent write-downs in the carrying value and expenses incurred to maintain the properties are charged to expense. Costs relating to the development and improvement of the property are capitalized, subject to the limit of fair value of the collateral. Gains or losses are included in operations upon disposal.
Premises and equipment
Premises and equipment are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation computed on the straight-line method at rates based on estimated useful lives.
Expenditures for replacements or major improvements are capitalized. Expenditures for normal maintenance and repairs are charged to expense as incurred. Upon the sale or retirement of premises and equipment, the cost and accumulated depreciation are removed from their respective accounts and any gain or loss is included in income.
Bank owned life insurance
The cash surrender value of bank owned life insurance relates to policies on employees of the Bank for which the Bank is the beneficiary. Increases in cash surrender value are included in noninterest income in the consolidated income statements.
Income from investment advisory services, net
In conjunction with a third party, an employee of the Bank is licensed to sell non-deposit investment products, including mutual funds, annuities and other insurance products. The Bank records, as noninterest income, revenues earned from product sales in accordance with the terms of revenue sharing agreements with the third party, net of certain marketing and other expenses shared with the third party. The Bank currently employs the individual authorized to sell these products and pays most of the direct costs related to the sales activities. These costs are charged to expense as incurred, and are classified primarily in compensation and benefits expense.
Income taxes
The Company accounts for certain income and expense items differently for financial reporting purposes than for income tax purposes. Provisions for deferred taxes are being made in recognition of these temporary differences. Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance when, in the opinion of management, it is more likely than not that some or all of a deferred tax item will not be realized.
F - 10
Table of Contents
NAUGATUCK VALLEY FINANCIAL CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
The Company is required to make a determination of an inventory of tax positions (federal and state) for which the sustainability of the position, based upon the technical merits, is uncertain. The Company regularly evaluates all tax positions taken and the likelihood of those positions being sustained. If management is highly confident that the position will be allowed and there is a greater than 50% likelihood that the full amount of the tax position will be ultimately realized, the Company recognizes the full benefit associated with the tax position. Additionally, interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions are included as a component of income tax expense in the consolidated statements of income.
The Company has a tax allocation agreement with the Bank electing to file consolidated federal income tax returns. The tax allocation agreement indicates that income tax liabilities, refunds, payments and all other adjustments will be allocated to each entity using the separate return method. The Company and the Bank file separate corporate income tax returns for the State of Connecticut.
Earnings per share
Basic earnings per share is computed by dividing income available to common stockholders by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding for the period.
Computation of fair values
Accounting standards require disclosure of the estimated fair value of financial instruments including both assets and liabilities recognized and not recognized in the statement of financial condition, for which it is practicable. The calculation of fair value estimates of financial instruments is dependent upon certain subjective assumptions and involves significant uncertainties. Changes in assumptions could significantly affect the estimates. These estimates do not reflect any possible tax ramifications, estimated transaction costs or any premium or discount that could result from offering the Company’s entire holdings of a particular financial instrument.
The following methods and assumptions were utilized by the Company in estimating the fair values of its on-balance sheet financial instruments:
Cash and cash equivalents—The carrying amounts reported in the statement of financial condition approximate these assets’ fair value.
Loans receivable—For variable rate loans that reprice frequently and without significant change in credit risk, fair values are based on carrying values. The fair value of other loans are estimated using discounted cash flow analyses using interest rates currently being offered for loans with similar terms to borrowers of similar credit quality. The fair value of nonaccrual loans was estimated using the estimated fair values of the underlying collateral.
Accrued income receivable—The carrying amounts reported in the statement of financial condition approximate these assets’ fair value.
Deposits liabilities—The fair values of non-interest-bearing demand and savings deposits are, by definition, equal to the amount payable on demand at the reporting date, i.e., their carrying amounts. Fair values for time certificates of deposit are estimated using a discounted cash flow technique that applies interest rates currently being offered to a schedule of aggregated expected monthly maturities on time deposits.
Borrowed Funds—Fair values are estimated using discounted cash flow analyses based on the Company’s current incremental borrowing rates for similar types of borrowing arrangements.
Mortgagors’ escrow accounts—The carrying amounts reported in the statement of financial condition approximate the fair value of the mortgagors’ escrow accounts.
F - 11
Table of Contents
NAUGATUCK VALLEY FINANCIAL CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Accounting Standards Update
On July 1, 2009, the Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) became the Financial Accounting Standards Board’s (“FASB”) single source of authoritative U.S. accounting and reporting standards applicable to all public and non-public non-governmental entities, superseding existing FASB, American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (“AICPA”), Emerging Issues Task Force (“EITF”) and related literature. The adoption of this ASC topic changed the applicable citations and naming conventions used when referencing generally accepted accounting principles.
In January 2011, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2011-01, “Deferral of the Effective Date of Disclosures About Troubled Debt Restructurings in Update No. 2010-20”, which temporarily defers the effective date in ASU 2010-20 for disclosures about TDRs by creditors until the FASB finalizes its project on determining what constitutes a TDR for a creditor. Since the provisions of ASU 2010-20 are disclosure-related the Bank’s adoption of this guidance will not have an impact on the Company’s financial condition or results of operations.
In December 2010, the FASB issued guidance regarding disclosure of supplementary pro forma information for business combinations. This guidance specifies that if a public entity presents comparative financial statements, the entity should disclose revenue and earnings of the combined entity as though the business combination(s) that occurred during the current year had occurred as of the beginning of the comparable prior annual reporting period only. The guidance also expands the supplemental pro forma disclosures to include a description of the nature and amount of material, nonrecurring pro forma adjustments directly attributable to the business combination included in the reported pro forma revenue and earnings. This guidance is effective prospectively for business combinations for which the acquisition date is on or after the beginning of the first annual reporting period beginning on or after December 15, 2010. The Company does not expect this guidance to have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.
In July 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-20, “Disclosures about the Credit Quality of Financing Receivables and the Allowance for Credit Losses.” This ASU is intended to provide additional information to assist financial statement users in assessing the entity’s credit risk exposures and evaluating the adequacy of its allowance for credit losses. The new and amended disclosures that relate to information as of the end of a reporting period are effective for the Company as of December 15, 2010. The disclosures that include information for activity that occurs during a reporting period will be effective beginning January 1, 2011 for the Company. Those disclosures include (1) the activity in the allowance for credit losses for each period and (2) disclosures about modifications of financing receivables.
In January 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-06, “Improving Disclosures about Fair Value Measurements”. The ASU requires disclosing the amounts of significant transfers in and out of Level 1 and 2 of the fair value hierarchy and describing the reasons for the transfers. The disclosures are effective for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2009. Additionally, disclosures of the gross purchases, sales, issuances and settlements activity in the Level 3 of the fair value measurement hierarchy will be required for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2010.
Management does not believe the adoption of these standards will have a significant impact on the Company’s financial statements.
Reclassification
Certain reclassifications have been made to the prior period financial statements to conform to the current reporting presentation. These reclassifications only changed the reporting categories but did not affect the results of operations or financial position.
F - 12
Table of Contents
NAUGATUCK VALLEY FINANCIAL CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
| 4. | Investment Securities |
A summary of investment securities at December 31, 2010 and 2009 follows:
| 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||||
| (In thousands) |
Carrying Amount |
Fair Value |
Carrying Amount |
Fair Value |
||||||||||||
| Available-for-sale securities |
$ | 31,683 | $ | 31,683 | $ | 37,623 | $ | 37,623 | ||||||||
| Held-to-maturity securities |
15,334 | 15,104 | 1,451 | 1,475 | ||||||||||||
| Total investment securities |
$ | 47,017 | $ | 46,787 | $ | 39,074 | $ | 39,098 | ||||||||
At December 31, 2010, the composition of the investment portfolio was as follows:
| Amortized Cost Basis |
Gross Unrealized | Fair Value |
||||||||||||||
| (In thousands) |
Gains | Losses | ||||||||||||||
| Available-for-sale securities: |
||||||||||||||||
| U.S. government and agency obligations From one through five years |
$ | 1,022 | $ | 65 | $ | — | $ | 1,087 | ||||||||
| Mortgage-backed securities |
19,093 | 867 | — | 19,960 | ||||||||||||
| Collateralized mortgage obligations |
2,706 | 31 | (61 | ) | 2,676 | |||||||||||
| Total debt securities |
22,821 | 963 | (61 | ) | 23,723 | |||||||||||
| Money market preferred stocks |
8,200 | — | (240 | ) | 7,960 | |||||||||||
| Total available-for-sale securities |
$ | 31,021 | $ | 963 | $ | (301 | ) | $ | 31,683 | |||||||
| Amortized Cost Basis |
Gross Unrealized | Fair Value |
||||||||||||||
| (In thousands) |
Gains | Losses | ||||||||||||||
| Held-to-maturity securities: |
||||||||||||||||
| Mortgage-backed securities |
$ | 15,334 | $ | 26 | $ | (256 | ) | $ | 15,104 | |||||||
| Total held-to-maturity securities |
$ | 15,334 | $ | 26 | $ | (256 | ) | $ | 15,104 | |||||||
At December 31, 2009, the composition of the investment portfolio was as follows:
| Amortized Cost Basis |
Gross Unrealized | Fair Value |
||||||||||||||
| (In thousands) |
Gains | Losses | ||||||||||||||
| Available-for-sale securities: |
||||||||||||||||
| U.S. government and agency obligations |
||||||||||||||||
| From one through five years |
$ | 1,029 | $ | 40 | $ | — | $ | 1,069 | ||||||||
| From five through ten years |
500 | 14 | — | 514 | ||||||||||||
| 1,529 | 54 | — | 1,583 | |||||||||||||
| Corporate bonds |
||||||||||||||||
| From one through five years |
1,000 | — | (340 | ) | 660 | |||||||||||
| Mortgage-backed securities |
23,561 | 939 | — | 24,500 | ||||||||||||
| Collateralized mortgage obligations |
3,091 | 13 | (104 | ) | 3,000 | |||||||||||
| Total debt securities |
29,181 | 1,006 | (444 | ) | 29,743 | |||||||||||
| Money market preferred stocks |
8,200 | — | (320 | ) | 7,880 | |||||||||||
| Total available-for-sale securities |
$ | 37,381 | $ | 1,006 | $ | (764 | ) | $ | 37,623 | |||||||
F - 13
Table of Contents
NAUGATUCK VALLEY FINANCIAL CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
| Amortized Cost Basis |
Gross Unrealized | Fair Value |
||||||||||||||
| (In thousands) |
Gains | Losses | ||||||||||||||
| Held-to-maturity securities: |
||||||||||||||||
| Mortgage-backed securities |
$ | 1,451 | $ | 24 | $ | — | $ | 1,475 | ||||||||
| Total held-to-maturity securities |
$ | 1,451 | $ | 24 | $ | — | $ | 1,475 | ||||||||
For the year ended December 31, 2010, the Company realized gross gains of $231,265 and gross losses of $220,000 compared with gross gains of $425,637 and gross losses of $37,203 for the year ended December 31, 2009 and gross gains of $129,450 and gross losses of $100,622 for the year ended December 31, 2008 on sales of investment securities. For the year ended December 31, 2009, gross gains included approximately $9,600 of gains realized on the sale of Fannie Mae preferred stock. During 2008, the Company realized an other-than-temporary impairment loss on these shares of stock, which collateralized auction rate pass through certificates, in the amount of $3.4 million.
The Company has identified other investment securities in which the fair value of the security is less than the cost of the security. This can be from an increase in interest rates since the time of purchase or from deterioration in credit quality of the issuer. All investment securities which have unrealized losses have undergone an internal impairment review.
Management’s review for impairment generally entails identification and analysis of individual investments that have fair values less than amortized cost, including consideration of the length of time the investment has been in an unrealized loss position and the expected recovery period; discussion of evidential matter, including an evaluation of factors or triggers that could cause individual investments to qualify as having other-than-temporary impairment and those that would not support other-than-temporary impairment; and documentation of the results of these analyses. As a result of the reviews, management has determined that there has been no deterioration in credit quality subsequent to purchase, and believes that these unrealized losses are temporary and are the result of changes in market interest rates and market conditions over the past several years.
At December 31, 2010, these securities had an aggregate fair value of $16.7 million which resulted in an unrealized loss of $557,000 as compared with an aggregate fair value of $3.4 million and unrealized losses of $764,000 at December 31, 2009.
F - 14
Table of Contents
NAUGATUCK VALLEY FINANCIAL CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Unrealized losses on investment securities at December 31, 2010
The following is a summary of the fair values and related unrealized losses aggregated by investment category and length of time that individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position:
| Securities in Continuous Unrealized Loss Position Less Than 12 Months |
||||||||||||
| (Dollars in thousands) |
Number of Securities |
Market Value |
Unrealized Loss |
|||||||||
| Collateralized mortgage obligations |
1 | $ | 182 | $ | (3 | ) | ||||||
| Mortgage backed securities |
5 | 14,028 | (256 | ) | ||||||||
| Total securities in unrealized loss position |
6 | $ | 14,210 | $ | (259 | ) | ||||||
| Securities in Continuous
Unrealized Loss Position 12 or More Consecutive Months |
||||||||||||
| (Dollars in thousands) |
Number
of Securities |
Market Value |
Unrealized Loss |
|||||||||
| Collateralized mortgage obligations |
1 | $ | 376 | $ | (58 | ) | ||||||
| Money market preferred stocks |
2 | 2,160 | (240 | ) | ||||||||
| Total securities in unrealized loss position |
3 | $ | 2,536 | $ | (298 | ) | ||||||
Unrealized losses on investment securities at December 31, 2009
The following is a summary of the fair values and related unrealized losses aggregated by investment category and length of time that individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position:
| Securities in Continuous
Unrealized Loss Position 12 or More Consecutive Months |
||||||||||||
| (Dollars in thousands) |
Number of Securities |
Market Value |
Unrealized Loss |
|||||||||
| Collateralized mortgage obligations |
2 | $ | 652 | $ | (104 | ) | ||||||
| Corporate bonds |
1 | 660 | (340 | ) | ||||||||
| Money market preferred stocks |
2 | 2,080 | (320 | ) | ||||||||
| Total securities in unrealized loss position |
5 | $ | 3,392 | $ | (764 | ) | ||||||
At December 31, 2010 and 2009, securities with amortized costs of $17,589,605 and $14,049,618, and fair values of $17,438,080 and $14,382,522, respectively, were pledged as collateral to secure municipal deposits and reverse repurchase agreements.
Included in accrued income receivable at December 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009 was $131,000 and $120,000 for mortgage-backed securities, respectively, and $61,000 and $81,000 for other investments over the same periods.
F - 15
Table of Contents
NAUGATUCK VALLEY FINANCIAL CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
| 5. | Loans Receivable |
A summary of loans receivable at December 31, 2010 and 2009 is as follows:
| December 31, | ||||||||
| (Dollars in thousands) |
2010 | 2009 | ||||||
| Real estate loans: |
||||||||
| One-to-four family |
$ | 219,286 | $ | 229,693 | ||||
| Construction |
30,921 | 46,298 | ||||||
| Multi-family and commercial real estate |
160,235 | 134,931 | ||||||
| Total real estate loans |
410,442 | 410,922 | ||||||
| Commercial business loans |
34,742 | 31,325 | ||||||
| Consumer loans: |
||||||||
| Savings accounts |
956 | 1,113 | ||||||
| Personal |
236 | 256 | ||||||
| Automobile |
168 | 230 | ||||||
| Home equity |
34,807 | 37,276 | ||||||
| Total consumer loans |
36,167 | 38,875 | ||||||
| Totals loans |
481,351 | 481,122 | ||||||
| Less: |
||||||||
| Allowance for loan losses |
6,393 | 3,996 | ||||||
| Undisbursed construction loans |
1,034 | 3,336 | ||||||
| Deferred loan origination fees |
403 | 486 | ||||||
| Loans receivable, net |
$ | 473,521 | $ | 473,304 | ||||
| Weighted average yield |
5.47 | % | 5.67 | % | ||||
The Bank’s lending activities are conducted principally in the Naugatuck Valley area of Connecticut. The Bank’s investment in loans includes both adjustable and fixed rate loans. At December 31, 2010 and 2009, the composition of the Bank’s investment in fixed rate loans was as follows:
| Fixed Rate |
||||||||
| Term to Maturity |
2010 | 2009 | ||||||
| (In thousands) | ||||||||
| Less than 1 year |
$ | 6,096 | $ | 3,611 | ||||
| 1 – 3 years |
5,256 | 6,970 | ||||||
| 3 – 5 years |
5,321 | 5,906 | ||||||
| 5 – 10 years |
27,717 | 29,671 | ||||||
| 10 – 20 years |
55,224 | 50,818 | ||||||
| Over 20 years |
145,039 | 159,940 | ||||||
| Total loans at fixed rates |
$ | 244,653 | $ | 256,916 | ||||
F - 16
Table of Contents
NAUGATUCK VALLEY FINANCIAL CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Adjustable rate loans have interest rate adjustment limitations and are indexed to treasury notes or Federal Home Loan Bank of Boston (“FHLBB”) classic advances with similar repricing durations, or prime rate. At December 31, 2010 and 2009, the Bank had the following adjustable rate loans:
| Adjustable Rate |
||||||||
| Rate Adjustment |
2010 | 2009 | ||||||
| (In thousands) | ||||||||
| Less than 1 year |
$ | 93,133 | $ | 91,321 | ||||
| 1 – 3 years |
47,241 | 36,986 | ||||||
| 3 – 5 years |
65,725 | 55,058 | ||||||
| 5 – 10 years |
30,599 | 40,841 | ||||||
| Over 10 years |
— | — | ||||||
| Total loans at adjustable rates |
$ | 236,698 | $ | 224,206 | ||||
As of December 31, 2010 and 2009, loans to related parties totaled approximately $2,490,000 and $3,976,000, respectively. For the year ended December 31, 2010, new loans of approximately $1,267,000 were granted to these parties and principal payments of approximately $2.0 million were received. During 2010, loans in the amount of $752,000 were removed from loans to related parties for individuals whose related interests changed during the year, combined with loan sales. For the year ended December 31, 2009, new loans of approximately $1,123,000 were granted to these parties and principal payments of approximately $992,000 were received.
Related parties include directors and officers of the Bank, any respective affiliates in which they have a controlling interest, and their immediate families. For the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, all loans to related parties were performing in accordance with the original terms.
The Bank services loans for other financial institutions and agencies. These loans are originated by the Bank and then sold. The Bank continues to service these loans and remits the payments received to the purchasing institution. The amounts of these loans were approximately $41,251,000, $7,256,000 and $8,693,000 at December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
The balance of capitalized servicing rights, included in other assets at December 31, 2010 were approximately $364,000. The changes in capitalized servicing rights for the year ended December 31, 2010 were as follows:
| (In thousands) |
2010 | 2009 | ||||||
| Balance at beginning of the year |
$ | — | $ | — | ||||
| Servicing rights capitalized |
465 | — | ||||||
| Amortization of servicing rights |
(96 | ) | ||||||
| Periodic impairment |
(5 | ) | — | |||||
| Balance at the end of the year |
$ | 364 | $ | — | ||||
F - 17
Table of Contents
NAUGATUCK VALLEY FINANCIAL CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
At December 31, 2010, key economic assumptions and the sensitivity of the current fair value of residual cash flows, should immediate 10 percent and 20 percent adverse changes in those assumptions occur, are as follows:
| (In thousands) |
2010 | |||
| Carrying amount |
$ | 364 | ||
| Weighted average life (in years) |
6.87 | |||
| Prepayment Speed Assumption |
PSA 195 | |||
| Impact on fair value of 10% adverse change |
(19 | ) | ||
| Impact on fair value of 20% adverse change |
(35 | ) | ||
| Residual Cash Flows Discount Rate (annual) |
8.25 | % | ||
| Impact on fair value of 10% adverse change |
(17 | ) | ||
| Impact on fair value of 20% adverse change |
(33 | ) | ||
Credit Quality of Financing Receivables and the Allowance for Loan Losses
Management segregates the loan portfolio into portfolio segments which is defined as the level at which the Company develops and documents a systematic method for determining its allowance for loan losses. The portfolio segments are segregated based on loan types and the underlying risk factors present in each loan type. Such risk factors are periodically reviewed by management and revised as deemed appropriate.
The Company’s loan portfolio is segregated into the following portfolio segments:
One-to Four-Family Owner Occupied Loans. This portfolio segment consists of the origination of first mortgage loans secured by one-to four-family owner occupied residential properties and residential construction loans to individuals to finance the construction of residential dwellings for personal use located in our market area. The Company has experienced a low level of foreclosures on its owner occupied loan portfolio during recent periods and believe this is due mainly to its conservative underwriting and lending strategies which do not allow for risky loans such as “Option ARM,” “sub-prime” or “Alt-A” loans.
Commercial Real Estate and Multi-family Loans. This portfolio segment includes loans secured by commercial real estate, non-owner occupied one-to four-family and multi-family dwellings for property owners and businesses in our market area. Loans secured by commercial real estate generally have larger loan balances and more credit risk than owner occupied one-to four-family mortgage loans. The increased risk is the result of several factors, including the concentration of principal in a limited number of loans and borrowers, the impact of local and general economic conditions on the borrower’s ability to repay the loan, and the increased difficulty of evaluating and monitoring these types of loans.
Construction and Land Development Loans. This portfolio segment includes commercial construction loans for commercial development projects, including condominiums, apartment buildings, and single family subdivisions as well as office buildings, retail and other income producing properties and land loans, which are loans made with land as security. Construction and land development financing generally involves greater credit risk than long-term financing on improved, owner-occupied real estate. Risk of loss on a construction loan depends largely upon the accuracy of the initial estimate of the value of the property at completion of construction compared to the estimated cost (including interest) of construction and other assumptions. If the estimate of construction cost proves to be inaccurate, the Company may be required to advance additional funds beyond the amount originally committed in order to protect the value of the property. Moreover, if the estimated value of the completed project proves to be inaccurate, the borrower may hold a property with a value that is insufficient to assure full repayment. Construction loans also expose the Company to the risks that improvements will not be completed on time in accordance with specifications
F - 18
Table of Contents
NAUGATUCK VALLEY FINANCIAL CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
and projected costs and that repayment will depend on the successful operation or sale of the properties, which may cause some borrowers to be unable to continue with debt service which exposes the Company to greater risk of non-payment and loss.
Commercial Business Loans. This portfolio segment includes commercial business loans secured by real estate, assignments of corporate assets, and personal guarantees of the business owners. Commercial business loans generally have higher interest rates and shorter terms than other loans, but they also may involve higher average balances, increased difficulty of loan monitoring and a higher risk of default since their repayment generally depends on the successful operation of the borrower’s business.
Real Estate Secured Loans. This portfolio segment includes home equity loans and home equity lines of credit secured by owner occupied one-to four-family residential properties. Loans of this type are written at a maximum of 75% of the appraised value of the property and we require that we have a second lien position on the property. These loans are written at a higher interest rate and a shorter term than mortgage loans. The Company has experience a low level of foreclosure in this type of loan during recent periods. These loans can be affected by economic conditions and the values of the underlying properties.
Consumer Loans. This portfolio segment includes loans secured by passbook or certificate accounts, or automobiles, as well as unsecured personal loans and overdraft lines of credit. This type of loan may entail greater risk than do residential mortgage loans, particularly in the case of loans that are unsecured or secured by assets that depreciate rapidly.
Loans are generally carried at the amount of unpaid principal, less the allowance for loan losses and adjusted for deferred loan fees, which are amortized over the term of the loan using the interest method. Interest on loans is accrued based on the principal amounts outstanding. It is the Company’s policy to discontinue the accrual of interest when a loan is specifically determined to be impaired or when the principal or interest is delinquent for 90 days or more. When a loan is placed on nonaccrual status, all interest previously accrued but not collected is reversed against current period interest income.
The allowance for loan losses is established through a provision for loan losses. The Company maintains the allowance at a level believed, to the best of management’s knowledge, adequate to cover all known and inherent losses in the loan portfolio that are both probable and reasonable to estimate at each reporting date.
Management reviews the allowance for loan losses on no less than a quarterly basis in order to identify those inherent losses and to assess the overall collection probability for the loan portfolio. The evaluation process by portfolio segment includes, among other things, an analysis of delinquency trends, non-performing loan trends, the level of charge-offs and recoveries, prior loss experience, total loans outstanding, the volume of loan originations, the type, size and geographic concentration of the loans, the value of collateral securing the loan, the borrower’s ability to repay and repayment performance, the number of loans requiring heightened management oversight, local economic conditions and industry experience.
The establishment of the allowance for loan losses is significantly affected by management’s judgment and uncertainties, and there is a likelihood that different amounts would be reported under different conditions or assumptions. The Office of Thrift Supervision, as an integral part of its examination process, periodically reviews the allowance for loan losses and may require the Company to make additional provisions for estimated loan losses based upon judgments different from those of management.
The allowance generally consists of specific (or allocated) and general components. The specific component relates to loans that are recognized as impaired. For such impaired loans, an allowance is established when the discounted cash flows (or collateral value or observable market price if the loan is collateral dependent) of the impaired loan is lower than the carrying value of that loan. The general component covers non-classified loans
F - 19
Table of Contents
NAUGATUCK VALLEY FINANCIAL CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
and is based on historical loss experience adjusted for qualitative factors. Additional general reserves are placed on loans classified as either doubtful, substandard or special mention.
The Company will continue to monitor and modify its allowance for loan losses as conditions dictate. No assurances can be given that the level of allowance for loan losses will cover all of the inherent losses on the loans or that future adjustments to the allowance for loan losses will not be necessary if economic and other conditions differ substantially from the economic and other conditions used by management to determine the current level of the allowance for loan losses.
Transactions in the allowance for loan losses account for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008 were as follows:
| (In thousands) |
2010 | 2009 | 2008 | |||||||||
| Balance at beginning of year |
$ | 3,996 | $ | 2,869 | $ | 2,163 | ||||||
| Provision for loan losses |
3,360 | 1,144 | 675 | |||||||||
| Loans written off |
(978 | ) | (18 | ) | (7 | ) | ||||||
| Recoveries of loans written off |
15 | 1 | 38 | |||||||||
| Balance at end of year |
$ | 6,393 | $ | 3,996 | $ | 2,869 | ||||||
The following tables set forth the balance of the allowance for loan losses at December 31, 2010, by portfolio segment, disaggregated by impairment methodology, which is then further segregated by amounts evaluated for impairment collectively and individually. Also included is a summary of transactions in the allowance for loan and lease losses for the year ended December 31, 2010. The allowance for loan losses allocated to each portfolio segment is not necessarily indicative of future losses in any particular portfolio segment and does not restrict the use of the allowance to absorb losses in other portfolio segments.
| (In thousands) |
One-to-Four Family |
Construction | Commercial Real Estate |
Commercial | Consumer | Total | ||||||||||||||||||
| Allowance for Loan Losses: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Beginning Balance |
$ | 1,044 | $ | 632 | $ | 1,489 | $ | 481 | $ | 350 | $ | 3,996 | ||||||||||||
| Charge-offs |
(27 | ) | (170 | ) | — | (754 | ) | (27 | ) | (978 | ) | |||||||||||||
| Recoveries |
— | — | — | 15 | — | 15 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Provisions |
568 | 138 | 1,225 | 1,142 | 287 | 3,360 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Ending Balance |
$ | 1,585 | $ | 600 | $ | 2,714 | $ | 884 | $ | 610 | $ | 6,393 | ||||||||||||
| Ending Balance individually evaluated for impairment |
$ | 2,677 | $ | 4,059 | $ | 1,106 | $ | 1,598 | $ | 277 | $ | 9,717 | ||||||||||||
| Ending Balance collectively evaluated for impairment |
$ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | ||||||||||||
The Company’s policies provide for the classification of loans and other assets into the following categories: pass (1 – 4), bankable with care (5), special mention (6), substandard (7), doubtful (8) and loss (9). Consistent with regulatory guidelines, loans and other assets that are considered to be of lesser quality are classified as substandard, doubtful, or loss assets. An asset is considered substandard if it is inadequately protected by the current net worth and paying capacity of the obligor or of the collateral pledged, if any. Substandard assets include those assets characterized by the distinct possibility that we will sustain some loss if the deficiencies are not corrected. Assets classified as doubtful have all of the weaknesses inherent in those classified substandard with the added characteristic that the weaknesses present make collection or liquidation in full, on the basis of
F - 20
Table of Contents
NAUGATUCK VALLEY FINANCIAL CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
currently existing facts, conditions and values, highly questionable and improbable. Assets (or portions of assets) classified as loss are those considered uncollectible and of such little value that there continuance as assets is not warranted. Assets that do not expose us to risk sufficient to warrant classification in one of the aforementioned categories, but which possess potential weaknesses that deserve close attention, are required to be designated as special mention.
When assets are classified as special mention, substandard or doubtful, the Company disaggregates these assets and allocates a portion of the related general loss allowances to such assets as the Company deems prudent. Determinations as to the classification of assets and the amount of loss allowances are subject to review by our principal federal regulator, the Office of Thrift Supervision, which can require that we establish additional loss allowances. The Company regularly reviews its asset portfolio to determine whether any assets require classification in accordance with applicable regulations.
The following tables are a summary of the loan portfolio quality indicators by loan class as of December 31, 2010:
| Commercial Loans - Credit Risk Profile by Internally Assigned Grade |
||||||||||||
| At December 31, 2010 | ||||||||||||
| (In thousands) |
Commercial Loans |
Commercial Real Estate Construction |
Commercial Real Estate |
|||||||||
| Grade: |
||||||||||||
| 4 |
$ | 3,697 | $ | 281 | $ | 39,176 | ||||||
| 5 |
24,931 | 10,847 | 91,329 | |||||||||
| 6 |
3,456 | 5,391 | 16,430 | |||||||||
| 7 |
2,555 | 11,623 | 13,300 | |||||||||
| 8 |
103 | — | — | |||||||||
| Total |
$ | 34,742 | $ | 28,142 | $ | 160,235 | ||||||
| Consumer Loans - Credit Risk Profile by Internally Assigned Grade |
||||||||
| At December 31, 2010 | ||||||||
| (In thousands) |
Residential - Prime |
Residential - Subprime |
||||||
| Grade: |
||||||||
| Pass |
$ | 213,680 | $ | — | ||||
| Special Mention |
503 | — | ||||||
| Substandard |
3,563 | |||||||
| Doubtful |
1,540 | — | ||||||
| Total |
$ | 219,286 | $ | — | ||||
| Consumer Loans - Credit Risk Profile Based on Payment Activity: |
||||
| At December 31, 2010 | ||||
| (In thousands) |
Consumer - Other |
|||
| Grade: |
||||
| Performing |
$ | 35,652 | ||
| Nonperforming |
515 | |||
| Total |
$ | 36,167 | ||
F - 21
Table of Contents
NAUGATUCK VALLEY FINANCIAL CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
When a loan is 15 days past due, the Company sends the borrower a late notice. The Company also contacts the borrower by phone if the delinquency is not corrected promptly after the notice has been sent. When the loan is 30 days past due, the Company mails the borrower a letter reminding the borrower of the delinquency, and attempt to contact the borrower personally to determine the reason for the delinquency in order to ensure that the borrower understands the terms of the loan and the importance of making payments on or before the due date. If necessary, subsequent delinquency notices are issued and the account will be monitored on a regular basis thereafter. By the 90th day of delinquency, the Company will send the borrower a final demand for payment and may recommend foreclosure. A summary report of all loans 30 days or more past due is provided to the board of directors of the Company each month. Management works closely with the asset quality committee of the board of directors to resolve nonperforming assets in a manner most advantageous to the Company.
Loans are automatically placed on non-accrual status when payment of principal or interest is more than 90 days delinquent. Loans are also placed on non-accrual status if collection of principal or interest in full is in doubt or if the loan has been restructured. When loans are placed on non-accrual status, unpaid accrued interest is fully reversed, and further income is recognized only to the extent received. The loan may be returned to accrual status if unpaid principal and interest are repaid so that the loan is less than 90 days delinquent. Management works closely with the asset quality committee of the board of directors to resolve nonperforming assets in a manner most advantageous to the Company.
The following tables set forth certain information with respect to our loan portfolio delinquencies by loan class and amount as of December 31, 2010:
| Age Analysis of Past Due Financing Receivables As of December 31, 2010 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| (In thousands) |
31-60 Days Past Due |
61-90 Days Past Due |
Greater Than 90 Days (Nonaccrual) |
Total Past Due |
Current | Carrying Amount > 90 Days and Accruing |
Considered Current That Have Been Modified in Previous Year |
|||||||||||||||||||||
| Commercial |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Commercial—real estate |
$ | 60 | $ | 115 | $ | 1,356 | $ | 1,531 | $ | 33,211 | $ | — | $ | 2,494 | ||||||||||||||
| Commercial RE construction |
2,707 | — | 5,151 | 7,858 | 20,284 | — | 4,379 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Commercial RE |
1,686 | 258 | 6,242 | 8,186 | 152,049 | — | 16,525 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Consumer |
— | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Consumer—other |
470 | 100 | 515 | 1,085 | 35,082 | — | 208 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Residential |
— | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Residential—prime |
1,745 | 18 | 4,624 | 6,387 | 215,678 | — | 1,141 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Residential—subprime |
— | — | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Total |
$ | 6,668 | $ | 491 | $ | 17,888 | $ | 25,047 | $ | 456,304 | $ | — | $ | 24,747 | ||||||||||||||
The following table is a summary of nonaccrual loans by loan class as of December 31, 2010:
| Loans on Nonaccrual Status |
||||
| (In thousands) |
As of December 31, 2010 | |||
| Commercial |
$ | 1,356 | ||
| Commercial—real estate |
||||
| Commercial RE construction |
5,151 | |||
| Commercial RE |
6,242 | |||
| Consumer |
||||
| Consumer—other |
515 | |||
| Residential |
||||
| Residential—prime |
4,624 | |||
| Residential—subprime |
— | |||
| Total |
$ | 17,888 | ||
F - 22
Table of Contents
NAUGATUCK VALLEY FINANCIAL CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Nonperforming loans totaled approximately $17.9 million and $6.0 million at December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. These loans, primarily delinquent 90 or more days, were accounted for on a nonaccrual basis. The amount of income that was contractually due but not recognized on nonperforming loans totaled $513,000, $328,000, and $140,000 in 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
At December 31, 2010, there were no loans 90 or more days past due and still accruing interest. At December 31, 2010, the Company had 64 loans on non-accrual status with foregone interest in the amount of approximately $513,000. Included in these loans are 29 loans which are not 90 days past due, but were placed on non-accrual status as a result of a recent modification or a doubtful classification.
The Company accounts for impaired loans under generally accepted accounting principles. An impaired loan generally is one for which it is probable, based on current information, that the lender will not collect all the amounts due under the contractual terms of the loan. Loans are individually evaluated for impairment. When the Company classifies a problem asset as impaired, it provides a specific reserve for that portion of the asset that is deemed uncollectible.
At December 31, 2010, the Bank had approximately $9.7 million of loans which were considered impaired, with an allocated allowance of $929,000, as compared to $744,000 of such loans, with an allowance allocation of $98,000 at December 31, 2009. These loans averaged $9.7 million during 2010 and paid $135,000 in interest, as compared with an average balance of $750,000 during 2009 on which $23,000 of interest was received.
The following tables are a summary of impaired loans by class of loans as of December 31, 2010:
| Impaired Loans For the Year Ended December 31, 2010 |
||||||||||||||||||||
| (In thousands) |
Carrying Amount |
Unpaid Principal Balance |
Associated Allowance |
Average Carrying Amount |
Interest Income Recognized |
|||||||||||||||
| With no specific allowance recorded: |
||||||||||||||||||||
| Commercial |
$ | 4,011 | $ | 4,011 | $ | — | $ | 3,985 | $ | 4 | ||||||||||
| Consumer—other |
1,137 | 1,137 | — | 1,139 | 28 | |||||||||||||||
| With an allowance recorded: |
||||||||||||||||||||
| Commercial |
2,752 | 2,752 | 504 | 2,758 | 50 | |||||||||||||||
| Consumer—other |
1,816 | 1,816 | 425 | 1,802 | 53 | |||||||||||||||
| Total: |
||||||||||||||||||||
| Commercial |
6,763 | 6,763 | 504 | 6,743 | 54 | |||||||||||||||
| Consumer—other |
2,953 | 2,953 | 425 | 2,941 | 81 | |||||||||||||||
| 6. | Premises and Equipment |
Premises and equipment at December 31, 2010 and 2009 were summarized as follows:
| (In thousands) |
2010 | 2009 | ||||||
| Banking offices and branch buildings |
$ | 8,533 | $ | 8,469 | ||||
| Furniture and equipment |
3,953 | 3,651 | ||||||
| Land |
1,593 | 1,593 | ||||||
| Leasehold improvements |
1,409 | 1,326 | ||||||
| 15,488 | 15,039 | |||||||
| Accumulated depreciation and amortization |
(5,876 | ) | (5,091 | ) | ||||
| Premises and equipment, net |
$ | 9,612 | $ | 9,948 | ||||
F - 23
Table of Contents
NAUGATUCK VALLEY FINANCIAL CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Depreciation and amortization expense is computed using the straight-line method over the estimated useful life of an asset. Estimated useful lives range from three to ten years for furniture and equipment, 39 years for the banking offices, and the initial lease term for leasehold improvements. Land is not depreciated. Depreciation and amortization expenses were $805,704, $821,257 and $834,473 for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
The Bank leases space for five of its branch offices. The leases for the branch offices have expiration dates ranging from 2011 through 2020, and are accounted for as operating leases. At December 31, 2010, future minimum rental income and lease payment expense were expected to be:
| (In thousands) |
Income | Expense | ||||||
| 2011 |
$ | 95 | $ | 315 | ||||
| 2012 |
97 | 304 | ||||||
| 2013 |
94 | 255 | ||||||
| 2014 |
28 | 244 | ||||||
| 2015 |
21 | 245 | ||||||
| Thereafter |
— | 674 | ||||||
| Total future minimum rents |
$ | 335 | $ | 2,037 | ||||
During May, 2010 a tenant that was leasing space from the Bank terminated their lease. Upon termination, the Bank received thirteen months of rent. A new tenant signed a lease for this property in July 2010, and took occupancy early in the fourth quarter of 2010.
| 7. | Deposits |
Deposits and weighted average rates at December 31, 2010 and 2009 are summarized as follows:
| 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||||
| (Dollars in thousands) |
Amount | Weighted Average Cost |
Amount | Weighted Average Cost |
||||||||||||
| Certificate accounts |
$ | 239,406 | 2.68 | % | $ | 231,905 | 2.95 | % | ||||||||
| Regular savings accounts |
79,682 | 0.49 | % | 65,916 | 0.58 | % | ||||||||||
| Checking and NOW accounts |
59,914 | 0.06 | % | 57,319 | 0.09 | % | ||||||||||
| Money market savings accounts |
26,873 | 0.64 | % | 25,791 | 0.90 | % | ||||||||||
| Total deposits |
$ | 405,875 | 1.73 | % | $ | 380,931 | 1.97 | % | ||||||||
Interest paid on deposits for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008 was as follows:
| Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
| (In thousands) |
2010 | 2009 | 2008 | |||||||||
| Interest Expense |
||||||||||||
| Certificate accounts |
$ | 6,617 | $ | 7,741 | $ | 8,297 | ||||||
| Regular savings accounts |
413 | 390 | 288 | |||||||||
| Checking and NOW accounts |
45 | 45 | 159 | |||||||||
| Money market savings accounts |
222 | 301 | 527 | |||||||||
| Total interest expense on deposits |
$ | 7,297 | $ | 8,477 | $ | 9,271 | ||||||
F - 24
Table of Contents
NAUGATUCK VALLEY FINANCIAL CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
The aggregate amount of individual certificate accounts of $100,000 or more at December 31, 2010 and 2009 was $92,753,000 and $82,940,000 respectively. Under the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008, deposits up to $250,000 became federally insured through an extended date of December 31, 2013. The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (the “Dodd-Frank Act”), signed into law on July 21, 2010, permanently raised the maximum deposit insurance amount to $250,000, retroactive to January 1, 2008.
The Bank is participating in the FDIC’s Temporary Liquidity Guaranty Program (“TLGP”). Under that program, all noninterest-bearing transaction accounts are fully guaranteed by the FDIC for the entire balance in the account until December 31, 2010, recently extended to December 31, 2012. Coverage under the TLGP is in addition to, and separate from, the coverage available under the FDIC’s general deposit insurance rules. Effective December 31, 2010, under the Dodd-Frank Act, all funds held in noninterest-bearing transaction accounts will be fully insured, without limit, until December 31, 2012. The coverage under the Dodd-Frank Act is similar to that under the FDIC’s TLGP, but excludes low-interest NOW accounts and interest on lawyers trust accounts (IOLTA), which were covered under TLGP. Coverage under these programs is in addition to, and separate from, the coverage available under the FDIC’s general deposit insurance rules.
At December 31, 2010 and 2009, the remaining maturities for certificate accounts were as follows:
| (In thousands) |
2010 | 2009 | ||||||
| Certificate accounts maturing in: |
||||||||
| Under 12 months |
$ | 164,468 | $ | 115,648 | ||||
| 12 to 24 months |
42,931 | 73,704 | ||||||
| 24 to 36 months |
15,103 | 27,136 | ||||||
| Over 36 months |
16,904 | 15,417 | ||||||
| Total certificate accounts |
$ | 239,406 | $ | 231,905 | ||||
| 8. | Borrowed Funds |
Borrowings and advances, with calendar-year maturity dates and weighted average cost of funds at December 31, 2010 and 2009, were as follows:
| (Dollars in thousands) |
2010 | 2009 | ||||||||||||||
| Amount Due |
Weighted Average Cost |
Amount Due |
Weighted Average Cost |
|||||||||||||
| Short-term borrowings |
||||||||||||||||
| Repurchase agreements |
$ | 6,937 | 0.70 | % | $ | 6,431 | 0.92 | % | ||||||||
| Long-term FHLBB advances |
||||||||||||||||
| Year of maturity: |
||||||||||||||||
| 2010 |
— | — | 26,548 | 3.30 | ||||||||||||
| 2011 |
31,629 | 2.22 | 26,629 | 2.59 | ||||||||||||
| 2012 |
22,801 | 2.88 | 22,801 | 2.88 | ||||||||||||
| 2013 |
24,087 | 2.65 | 19,187 | 2.93 | ||||||||||||
| 2014 |
15,693 | 2.96 | 15,693 | 2.96 | ||||||||||||
| 2015 – 2019 |
978 | 2.20 | 978 | 2.20 | ||||||||||||
| 2020 – 2024 |
382 | 0.18 | 382 | 0.18 | ||||||||||||
| 2025 – 2028 |
335 | 0.00 | 335 | 0.00 | ||||||||||||
| Total long-term borrowings |
$ | 95,905 | 2.59 | $ | 112,553 | 2.91 | ||||||||||
| Total borrowed funds |
$ | 102,842 | 2.46 | $ | 118,984 | 2.80 | ||||||||||
F - 25
Table of Contents
NAUGATUCK VALLEY FINANCIAL CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
The Bank has an agreement with FHLBB providing for future credit availability of up to twenty times the amount of FHLBB stock held by the Bank, not to exceed 30% of its total assets. The Bank held $6,251,700 in FHLBB stock at December 31, 2010 and 2009. In addition to the outstanding advances, the Bank has a $2,540,000 line of credit available from FHLBB, none of which was outstanding at December 31, 2010 and 2009. The Bank also has a $3,500,000 line of credit available from another correspondent bank, none of which was outstanding at December 31, 2010 and 2009.
FHLBB advances are secured by a blanket lien on the Bank’s assets. Included in the amounts above are two long-term amortizing advances, which mature in 2023 and 2028 with interest rates of 0.27% and 0.00%, respectively, obtained under the Affordable Housing Program offered by FHLBB. These advances were used to provide loans, at nominal cost to the borrower, for development of low-cost housing in the Bank’s community.
Repurchase agreements generally have terms of one day, and are secured by government agency securities.
| 9. | Pension and Other Post-Retirement Benefits |
Pension Plan
Prior to September 1, 2005, the Bank participated in a multi-employer defined benefit pension plan covering all of its full time (as defined) employees who had been employed by the Bank for more than six months and were at least twenty-one years of age. Benefits under this plan became fully vested after five years of service. The Bank’s net pension cost for the period is the amount of contributions due. Total pension expense was $156,000 for the year ended December 31, 2010 compared with $88,000 and $50,000 for 2009 and 2008, respectively. Current valuations of the Bank’s allocation of the plan’s pooled assets are not available. Effective September 1, 2005, the Plan was amended and as a result, is considered frozen, with no new participants being accepted. No future compensation will be considered for benefit accruals, and there will be no future credited service, service accruals, or additional accrued benefits.
Defined Contribution Plan
The Bank has a defined contribution 401(k) plan for eligible employees. The Bank provides 75% matching of employee contributions, with a maximum contribution on up to 6% of the employee’s salary. The Bank’s contribution vests over a 6 year graded vesting schedule. The Bank’s contribution to the plan was $204,000, $194,000 and $191,000 for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
Directors Retirement Plan
Through December 27, 2006, the Bank sponsored a retirement and benefits plan for non-employee directors. All benefits earned were fully accrued based on a fixed amount at December 31, 2006, and were paid to the participating individuals in January, 2007.
Effective December 27, 2006, for fees and compensation earned beginning January 1, 2007, the Bank sponsors a deferred compensation plan under which non-employee directors may elect to defer up to 100% of their compensation in the form of either cash or stock-appreciation rights (“SARs”). If a deferral is made in SARs, then at the time of distribution an individual will receive in cash the value of an equivalent number of shares of the Company’s stock that could have been purchased at the time of the deferral. The individual will also receive in cash an amount equal to any dividends which would be paid on the equivalent shares during the deferral period. Under terms of the plan, an election to defer compensation, including which form (cash or SARs), must be made prior to December 31st of the preceding year. Each year the form of previous deferrals may be converted to the other form at the option of the individual participant.
F - 26
Table of Contents
NAUGATUCK VALLEY FINANCIAL CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Healthcare Benefits
In addition to providing pension benefits, the Bank provides certain health care benefits to retired employees. Substantially all of the Bank’s employees hired prior to February 2007 may become eligible for those benefits. The Bank’s policy is to accrue the expected cost of providing those benefits during the years that the employee renders the necessary service.
Obligation and Funded Status
The following table summarizes the obligation and funded status, as well as the amounts recognized in the consolidated statements of financial condition for the Healthcare Benefits Plan as of December 31, 2010 and 2009:
| Healthcare Benefit Plan | ||||||||
| (In thousands) |
2010 | 2009 | ||||||
| Measurement date |
12/31/2010 | 12/31/2009 | ||||||
| Projected benefit obligation |
$ | (376 | ) | $ | (361 | ) | ||
| Fair value of plan assets |
— | — | ||||||
| Funded status |
$ | (376 | ) | $ | (361 | ) | ||
| Accrued benefit cost recognized in the statement of financial condition |
$ | (376 | ) | $ | (361 | ) | ||
Net Periodic Benefit Cost and Contributions
The benefit costs and contributions related to the Healthcare Benefits plan for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009 were:
| Healthcare Benefit Plan | ||||||||
| (In thousands) |
2010 | 2009 | ||||||
| Net periodic benefit cost |
$ | 15 | $ | 27 | ||||
| Employer contributions |
19 | 18 | ||||||
| Plan participants’ contributions |
— | — | ||||||
| Benefits paid during the year |
19 | 18 | ||||||
Due to the unfunded status of the plan, the Bank expects to contribute the amount of the estimated benefit payments for the next fiscal year, which is $28,921 for the Healthcare Benefits Plan.
Assumptions and Effects
The actuarial assumptions used to determine the projected benefit obligations and net periodic benefit cost for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009 were as follows:
| Healthcare Benefit Plan | ||||||||
| Weighted-average assumptions: |
2010 | 2009 | ||||||
| Discount rate |
5.750 | % | 6.250 | % | ||||
| Rate of compensation increase |
— | — | ||||||
| Medical trend rate next year |
5.00 | % | 7.00 | % | ||||
| Ultimate medical trend rate |
5.00 | % | 5.00 | % | ||||
| Year ultimate trend rate is achieved |
2011 | 2011 | ||||||
F - 27
Table of Contents
NAUGATUCK VALLEY FINANCIAL CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Assumed health care cost trend rates have a significant effect on the amounts reported for the Healthcare Benefits plan. At December 31, 2009, a one percentage-point increase in the assumed health care trend rates would increase the projected benefit obligation by $50,998 compared with a decrease of $43,371 if the assumed health care trend rate were to decrease by one percentage-point.
| 10. | Employee Stock Ownership Plan |
During 2004 the Bank implemented the Naugatuck Valley Savings and Loan Employee Stock Ownership Plan (the “ESOP”). On September 30, 2004, the ESOP purchased 298,091 shares of the common stock of the Company. To fund the purchase, the ESOP borrowed $2,980,910 from the Company. The borrowing is at an interest rate of 4.75% and is to be repaid on a pro-rata basis in fifteen annual installments of $282,520 commencing with the quarter ended December 31, 2004 through September 30, 2019. In addition, dividends paid on the unreleased shares are used to reduce the principal balance of the loan. The collateral for the loan is the common stock of the Company purchased by the ESOP. Contributions by the Bank to the ESOP are discretionary, however, the Bank intends to make annual contributions in an aggregate amount at least equal to the principal and interest requirement on the debt.
The shares of stock purchased by the ESOP are held in a suspense account until they are released for allocation among participants. The shares will be released annually from the suspense account and the released shares will be allocated among the participants on the basis of each participant’s compensation for the year of allocation. As shares are released from collateral, the Bank recognizes compensation expense equal to the average market price of the shares during the period and the shares will be outstanding for earning per share purposes. The shares not released are reported as unearned ESOP shares in the capital accounts of the consolidated statements of financial condition. ESOP expense for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008 was $122,715, $112,373 and $169,056, respectively. At December 31, 2010 and 2009, there were 19,889 unallocated ESOP shares and 173,846 and 193,735 unreleased ESOP shares, respectively. At December 31, 2010 and 2009, the unreleased shares had aggregate fair values of $1,173,000 and $1,112,000, respectively.
| 11. | Equity Incentive Plan |
In 2005, stockholders of the Company approved the Naugatuck Valley Financial Corporation 2005 Equity Incentive Plan (the “Incentive Plan”). Under the Incentive Plan, the Company may grant up to 372,614 stock options and 149,045 shares of restricted stock to its employees, officers and directors for an aggregate amount of up to 521,659 shares of the Company’s common stock for issuance upon the grant or exercise of awards. Both incentive stock options and non-statutory stock options may be granted under the Incentive Plan. Through December 31, 2010, the following awards have been made:
| Grant Date | ||||||||||||||||||||
| July 26, 2008 |
December 18, 2007 |
March 20, 2007 |
March 21, 2006 |
July 26, 2005 |
||||||||||||||||
| Option awards |
||||||||||||||||||||
| Awarded |
1,000 | 2,000 | 7,500 | 6,500 | 354,580 | |||||||||||||||
| Exercise price |
$ | 11.10 | $ | 11.10 | $ | 12.49 | $ | 11.10 | $ | 11.10 | ||||||||||
| Maximum term |
10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | |||||||||||||||
| Restricted stock awards |
||||||||||||||||||||
| Awarded |
1,000 | 3,000 | 2,000 | 1,500 | 139,712 | |||||||||||||||
F - 28
Table of Contents
NAUGATUCK VALLEY FINANCIAL CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Stock option awards have been granted with an exercise price equal to the greater of the market price of the Company’s stock at the date of grant, or $11.10, which was the market price of the Company’s stock at the date stock option awards were initially granted under the Incentive Plan. Stock options and restricted stock awards are considered common stock equivalents for the purpose of computing earnings per share on a diluted basis. A summary of the status of outstanding stock options at December 31, 2010 and 2009 and changes therein was as follows:
| 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||||
| Number of Shares |
Weighted Average Exercise Price |
Number of Shares |
Weighted Average Exercise Price |
|||||||||||||
| Options outstanding at beginning of year |
353,430 | $ | 11.13 | 353,580 | $ | 11.13 | ||||||||||
| Granted |
— | — | — | — | ||||||||||||
| Forfeited |
(5,426 | ) | — | — | — | |||||||||||
| Exercised |
— | — | — | — | ||||||||||||
| Expired |
(21,704 | ) | 11.10 | (150 | ) | 11.10 | ||||||||||
| Options outstanding at end of year |
326,300 | 11.13 | 353,430 | 11.13 | ||||||||||||
| Options exercisable at end of year |
320,600 | 11.11 | 278,548 | 11.11 | ||||||||||||
| Weighted-average fair value of options granted during the year |
N/A | N/A | ||||||||||||||
The Company records share-based compensation expense related to outstanding stock options and restricted stock awards based upon the fair value at the date of grant over the vesting period of such awards on a straight-line basis. Both stock options and restricted stock awards vest at 20% per year beginning on the first anniversary of the date of grant.
The fair value of each restricted stock allocation, based on the market price at the date of grant, is recorded to unearned stock awards. Compensation expenses related to unearned restricted shares are amortized to compensation, taxes and benefits expense over the vesting period of the restricted stock awards.
The fair value of each stock option award is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing method which includes several assumptions such as volatility, expected dividends, expected term and risk-free rate for each stock option award.
In determining the expected term of the option awards, the Company has estimated the expected term of the options as being equal to the average of the vesting term plus the original contractual term. The Company estimated its volatility using the historical volatility of other, similar companies during a period of time equal to the expected life of the options. The risk-free rate for the periods within the contractual life of the options is based upon the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant.
Assumptions used to determine the weighted-average fair value of stock options granted were as follows:
| Grant date |
July 26, 2008 |
December 18, 2007 |
March 20, 2007 |
March 21, 2006 |
July 26, 2005 |
|||||||||||||||
| Dividend yield |
2.74 | % | 2.20 | % | 1.60 | % | 1.89 | % | 1.44 | % | ||||||||||
| Expected volatility |
13.40 | % | 11.00 | % | 10.49 | % | 11.20 | % | 11.47 | % | ||||||||||
| Risk-free rate |
3.56 | % | 3.63 | % | 4.48 | % | 4.61 | % | 4.18 | % | ||||||||||
| Expected life in years |
6.5 | 6.5 | 6.5 | 6.5 | 6.5 | |||||||||||||||
| Weighted average fair value of options at grant date |
$ | 1.51 | $ | 1.18 | $ | 2.55 | $ | 2.25 | $ | 2.47 | ||||||||||
F - 29
Table of Contents
NAUGATUCK VALLEY FINANCIAL CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
The Company recorded share-based compensation expense of $285,247, $531,743 and $507,557 for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively, in connection with the stock option and restricted stock awards. At December 31, 2010, the Company has approximately $8,877 of unrecorded option expense to be recognized over the remaining vesting period of the options.
| 12. | Income Taxes |
The Bank’s wholly-owned subsidiary, the Naugatuck Valley Mortgage Servicing Corporation, qualifies and operates as a Connecticut passive investment company pursuant to legislation. Because the subsidiary earns income from passive investments which is exempt from Connecticut Corporation Business Tax and its dividends to the Bank are exempt from state tax, the Bank no longer expects to incur state income tax expense.
Deferred income taxes reflect the impact of “temporary differences” between the amount of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and such amounts as measured by tax laws and regulations. Principal items making up the deferred income tax provision include impairment losses on investment securities for which the Company expects to realize a future benefit, a carry forward of charitable contributions, the provision for loan losses, accelerated tax depreciation and deferred mortgage fee income. The Company records a valuation allowance against deferred tax assets if, based on the weight of available evidence, it is more likely than not, that some or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. The Company believes that all deferred tax assets will be realized in the future and that no valuation allowance is necessary.
The provision (benefit) for income taxes for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008 consisted of:
| (In thousands) |
2010 | 2009 | 2008 | |||||||||
| Current income tax expense |
$ | 1,293 | $ | 114 | $ | 1,008 | ||||||
| Deferred income tax expense (benefit), due to: |
||||||||||||
| Impairment loss on investment securities |
— | 1,165 | (1,165 | ) | ||||||||
| Reserve for loan losses |
(815 | ) | (389 | ) | (236 | ) | ||||||
| Deferred income |
(3 | ) | (65 | ) | (151 | ) | ||||||
| Charitable contributions |
250 | 36 | 16 | |||||||||
| Post retirement benefits |
16 | (9 | ) | 11 | ||||||||
| Mortgage-servicing rights |
124 | — | — | |||||||||
| Depreciation |
(36 | ) | (36 | ) | (36 | ) | ||||||
| Other items |
— | 2 | (13 | ) | ||||||||
| Total deferred income tax expense (benefit) |
(464 | ) | 704 | (1,574 | ) | |||||||
| Provision (benefit) for income taxes |
$ | 829 | $ | 818 | $ | (566 | ) | |||||
F - 30
Table of Contents
NAUGATUCK VALLEY FINANCIAL CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
A reconciliation of the statutory federal income tax rate applied to income before income taxes with the income tax provision is as follows:
| Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
| (Dollars in thousands) |
2010 | 2009 | 2008 | |||||||||
| Income tax expense at statutory rate of 34% |
$ | 775 | $ | 956 | $ | (299 | ) | |||||
| Increase (decrease) in income tax expense resulting from: |
||||||||||||
| Nondeductible compensation expense |
67 | 85 | 100 | |||||||||
| Income exempt from income tax |
(264 | ) | (225 | ) | (371 | ) | ||||||
| Expiration of contribution carryforward |
250 | — | — | |||||||||
| Other items, net |
1 | 2 | 4 | |||||||||
| Provision (benefit) for income taxes |
$ | 829 | $ | 818 | $ | (566 | ) | |||||
| Effective rate of income tax expense |
36.4 | % | 29.1 | % | 64.5 | % | ||||||
Income taxes receivable and payable included in the balance sheet at December 31, 2010 and 2009 were:
| (In thousands) |
2010 | 2009 | ||||||
| Current tax receivable |
$ | 201 | $ | 281 | ||||
| Deferred tax receivable |
||||||||
| Reserve for loan losses |
$ | 2,175 | $ | 1,360 | ||||
| Deferred income |
388 | 385 | ||||||
| Charitable contributions carryforward |
— | 250 | ||||||
| Post-retirement benefits |
185 | 201 | ||||||
| Total deferred tax receivable |
2,748 | 2,196 | ||||||
| Deferred tax payable |
||||||||
| Depreciation |
$ | (29 | ) | $ | (65 | ) | ||
| Mortgage-servicing rights |
(124 | ) | — | |||||
| Available-for-sale securities |
(306 | ) | (191 | ) | ||||
| Total deferred tax payable |
(459 | ) | (256 | ) | ||||
| Net deferred tax receivable |
$ | 2,289 | $ | 1,940 | ||||
Retained earnings at December 31, 2010 includes a contingency reserve for loan losses of $1,843,000, which represents the tax reserve balance existing at December 31, 1987, and is maintained in accordance with provisions of the Internal Revenue Code applicable to thrift institutions. It is not anticipated that the Company will incur a federal income tax liability related to the reduction of this reserve and accordingly, deferred income taxes of $627,000 has not been recognized as of December 31, 2010.
Management regularly analyzes their tax positions and at December 31, 2010, does not believe that the Company has taken any tax positions where future deductibility is not certain. As of December 31, 2010, the Company is subject to unexpired statutes of limitation for examination of its tax returns for U.S. federal and Connecticut income taxes for the years 2007-2010.
F - 31
Table of Contents
NAUGATUCK VALLEY FINANCIAL CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
| 13. | Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income |
The source of the Company’s other comprehensive income (loss) is the unrealized gains and losses on its available for sale securities.
| For the Years Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
| (In thousands) |
2010 | 2009 | 2008 | |||||||||
| Net income (loss) |
$ | 1,451 | $ | 1,993 | $ | (312 | ) | |||||
| Other comprehensive income (loss): |
||||||||||||
| Unrealized gain (loss) on securities available-for-sale |
431 | 3,121 | (5,713 | ) | ||||||||
| Reclassification adjustment for losses (gains) realized in net income |
(11 | ) | (388 | ) | 3,398 | |||||||
| Other comprehensive income (loss) before tax effect |
420 | 2,733 | (2,315 | ) | ||||||||
| Income tax expense related to items of other comprehensive income (loss) |
116 | 178 | 73 | |||||||||
| Other comprehensive income (loss) net of tax effect |
304 | 2,555 | (2,388 | ) | ||||||||
| Total comprehensive income (loss) |
$ | 1,755 | $ | 4,548 | $ | (2,700 | ) | |||||
At December 31, 2008, the Company did not recognize approximately $714,000 of income tax benefits related to its other comprehensive loss for the year due to the uncertainty regarding its ability to realize a tax benefit from the estimated unrealized losses.
| 14. | Regulatory Capital |
The Company, as a federally chartered holding company, is not subject to regulatory capital requirements. The Bank is subject to various regulatory capital requirements administered by the federal banking agencies. Failure to meet minimum capital requirements can initiate certain mandatory and possibly additional discretionary actions by regulators that, if undertaken, could have a direct material effect on the Bank’s financial statements.
The Office of Thrift Supervision (OTS) regulations require savings institutions to maintain minimum levels of regulatory capital. As of December 31, 2010, the Bank meets all capital requirements to which it is subject. In addition, at December 31, 2010, the Bank was considered “well capitalized” for regulatory purposes. There have been no subsequent conditions or events which management believes have changed the Bank’s status.
The following is a summary of the Bank’s actual capital as computed under the standards established by the OTS at December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively.
| 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||||
| (Dollars in thousands) |
Amount | Ratio | Amount | Ratio | ||||||||||||
| Tangible Equity Ratio (to Tangible Assets) |
$ | 45,464 | 8.03 | % | $ | 43,050 | 7.76 | % | ||||||||
| Tier I (Core) Capital (to Adjusted Total Assets) |
45,464 | 8.03 | % | 43,050 | 7.76 | % | ||||||||||
| Tier I Risk-Based Capital (to Risk-Weighted Assets) |
45,464 | 10.59 | % | 43,050 | 10.16 | % | ||||||||||
| Total Risk-Based Capital (to Risk-Weighted Assets) |
50,831 | 11.84 | % | 47,046 | 11.10 | % | ||||||||||
The ability of the Company to pay dividends depends, in part, on the ability of the Bank to pay dividends to the Company. The Bank will not be able to declare or pay a cash dividend on, or repurchase any of its common stock, if the effect thereof would be to reduce the regulatory capital of the Bank to an amount below amounts required under OTS rules and regulations.
F - 32
Table of Contents
NAUGATUCK VALLEY FINANCIAL CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
The measurement of the Bank’s capital as computed under regulatory standards differs from its measurement under generally accepted accounting principles. A reconcilement of the Bank’s capital follows:
| December 31, | ||||||||
| (In thousands) |
2010 | 2009 | ||||||
| Total capital as calculated under generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP Capital) |
$ | 45,867 | $ | 43,171 | ||||
| Adjustments to reconcile Total GAAP Capital to Regulatory Capital: |
||||||||
| Intangible assets |
(71 | ) | (87 | ) | ||||
| Accumulated other comprehensive income from available-for-sale securities |
(332 | ) | (34 | ) | ||||
| Tier I Risk-Based Capital |
45,464 | 43,050 | ||||||
| Includible portion of allowance for loan losses |
5,367 | 3,996 | ||||||
| Total Risk-Based Capital |
$ | 50,831 | $ | 47,046 | ||||
The Dodd-Frank Act restructures the regulation of depository institutions. Under the Dodd-Frank Act, the Office of Thrift Supervision will be merged into the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, which regulates national banks. Savings and loan holding companies will be regulated by the Federal Reserve Board. The Dodd-Frank Act contains various provisions designed to enhance the regulation of depository institutions and prevent the recurrence of a financial crisis such as occurred in 2008-2009. Also included is the creation of a new federal agency to administer and enforce consumer and fair lending laws, a function that is now performed by the depository institution regulators. The federal preemption of state laws currently accorded federally chartered depository institutions will be reduced as well. The Dodd-Frank Act also will impose consolidated capital requirements on savings and loan holding companies effective in five years, which will limit our ability to borrow at the holding company and invest the proceeds from such borrowings as capital in the Bank that could be leveraged to support additional growth. The full impact of the Dodd-Frank Act on our business and operations will not be known for years until regulations implementing the statute are written and adopted. The Dodd-Frank Act may have a material impact on our operations, particularly through increased compliance costs resulting from possible future consumer and fair lending regulations.
F - 33
Table of Contents
NAUGATUCK VALLEY FINANCIAL CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
| 15. | Earnings per Share |
Basic net income per common share is calculated by dividing the net income available to common stockholders by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted net income per common share is computed in a manner similar to basic net income per common share except that the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding is increased to include the incremental common shares (as computed using the treasury stock method) that would have been outstanding if all potentially dilutive common stock equivalents were issued during the period. The Company’s common stock equivalents relate solely to stock option and restricted stock awards. Anti-dilutive shares are common stock equivalents with weighted-average exercise prices in excess of the weighted-average market value for the periods presented. For the years ended December 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, anti-dilutive options excluded from the calculations totaled 318,800 and 345,930 options, respectively (with an exercise price of $11.10) and 7,500 options in each period (with an exercise price of $12.49). Unreleased common shares held by the ESOP are not included in the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding for purposes of calculating either basic or diluted net income per common share.
| For the years ended December 31, | ||||||||
| 2010 | 2009 | |||||||
| Net income (loss) and income available to common stockholders |
$ | 1,451,000 | $ | 1,993,000 | ||||
| Weighted-average shares outstanding during the period |
||||||||
| Basic |
6,827,384 | 6,811,553 | ||||||
| Effect of dilutive stock options and restrictive stock awards |
— | — | ||||||
| Diluted |
6,827,384 | 6,811,553 | ||||||
| Net income (loss) per common share: |
||||||||
| Basic and Diluted Earnings per share |
$ | 0.21 | $ | 0.29 | ||||
| 16. | Financial Instruments |
The Company is a party to financial instruments with off-balance sheet risk in the normal course of business to meet the financing needs of its customers and to reduce its own exposure to fluctuations in interest rates. These financial instruments include commitments to extend credit. Those instruments involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit and interest rate risk in excess of the amounts recognized in the balance sheet.
The following table summarizes these financial instruments and other commitments and contingent liabilities as of December 31, 2010 and 2009:
| (In thousands) |
2010 | 2009 | ||||||
| Commitments to extend credit: |
||||||||
| Loan commitments |
$ | 12,233 | $ | 10,611 | ||||
| Unused lines of credit |
19,751 | 21,142 | ||||||
| Amounts due mortgagors on construction loans |
17,867 | 28,843 | ||||||
| Amounts due on commercial loans |
19,788 | 17,899 | ||||||
| Commercial letters of credit |
4,198 | 4,332 | ||||||
At December 31, 2010, included in the commitments to extend credit were commitments to fund loans in the amount of $4.5 million with fixed interest rates ranging from 4.5% to 17.0%.
F - 34
Table of Contents
NAUGATUCK VALLEY FINANCIAL CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
The Company’s exposure to credit loss in the event of nonperformance by the other party to the financial instrument for commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit is represented by the contractual notional amount of those instruments. The Company uses the same credit policies in making commitments and conditional obligations as it does for on-balance sheet instruments.
Commitments to extend credit are agreements to lend to a customer as long as there is no violation of any condition established in the contract. Commitments are principally collateralized by mortgages on real estate, generally have fixed expiration dates or other termination clauses and may require payment of fees. Since some of the commitments may expire without being drawn upon, the total commitment amounts do not necessarily represent future cash requirements.
| 17. | Fair Value |
The following is a summary of the carrying value and estimated fair value of the Company’s significant financial instruments as of December 31, 2010 and 2009:
| December 31, | ||||||||||||||||
| 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||||
| (In thousands) |
Carrying Amount |
Estimated Fair Value |
Carrying Amount |
Estimated Fair Value |
||||||||||||
| Financial Assets |
||||||||||||||||
| Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 14,263 | $ | 14,263 | $ | 12,146 | $ | 12,146 | ||||||||
| Investment securities |
47,017 | 46,787 | 39,074 | 39,098 | ||||||||||||
| Loans receivable, net |
473,521 | 478,104 | 473,304 | 476,665 | ||||||||||||
| Accrued income receivable |
1,979 | 1,979 | 2,074 | 2,074 | ||||||||||||
| Servicing rights |
364 | 420 | — | — | ||||||||||||
| Financial Liabilities |
||||||||||||||||
| Deposits |
$ | 405,875 | $ | 403,091 | $ | 380,931 | $ | 379,176 | ||||||||
| Borrowed funds |
102,842 | 104,766 | 118,984 | 120,719 | ||||||||||||
| Mortgagors’ escrow accounts |
4,832 | 4,832 | 4,888 | 4,888 | ||||||||||||
The Company uses fair value measurements to record fair value adjustments to certain assets and to determine fair value disclosures. Fair value is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. Fair value is best determined upon quoted market prices. However, in certain instances, there are no quoted market prices for certain assets or liabilities. In cases where quoted market prices are not available, fair values are based on estimates using present value or other valuation techniques. Those techniques are significantly affected by the assumptions used, including the discount rate and estimate of future cash flows. Accordingly, the fair value estimates may not be realized in an immediate settlement of the asset or liability.
Fair value measurements focus on exit prices in an orderly transaction (that is, not a forced liquidation or distressed sale) between market participants at the measurement date under current market conditions. If there had been a significant decrease in the volume and level of activity for the asset or liability, a change in the valuation technique or the use of multiple valuation techniques may be appropriate. In such instances, determining the price at which willing market participants would transact at the measurement date under current market conditions depends on the facts and circumstances and requires the use of significant judgment.
F - 35
Table of Contents
NAUGATUCK VALLEY FINANCIAL CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
The Bank’s fair value measurements are classified into a fair value hierarchy based on the markets in which the assets and liabilities are traded and the reliability of the assumptions used to determine fair value. The three categories within the hierarchy are as follows:
| Level 1 | — | Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities. | ||||
| Level 2 | — | Observable inputs other than Level 1 prices such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets; quoted prices in markets that are not active; and model-based valuation techniques for which all significant inputs are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities. | ||||
| Level 3 | — | Significant unobservable inputs that reflect a company’s own assumptions about the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability. | ||||
Valuation techniques based on unobservable inputs are highly subjective and require judgments regarding significant matters such as the amount and timing of future cash flows and the selection of discount rates that may appropriately reflect market and credit risks. Changes in these judgments often have a material impact on the fair value estimates. In addition, since these estimates are as of a specific point in time, they are susceptible to material near-term changes. The fair values disclosed do not reflect any premium or discount that could result from the sale of a large volume of a particular financial instrument, nor do they reflect the possible tax ramifications or estimated transaction costs.
The Company uses fair value measurements to record certain assets at fair value on a recurring basis. Additionally, the Company may be required to record at fair value other assets on a nonrecurring basis. These nonrecurring fair value adjustments typically involve the application of lower-of-cost-or market value accounting or write-downs of individual assets.
The Company used the following methods and significant assumptions to estimate the fair value of its financial instruments which are carried at fair value on a recurring basis in the financial statements:
Available-for-sale securities:
Fair value measurement is based upon quoted prices, if available. If quoted prices are not available, fair values are determined by matrix pricing, which is a mathematical technique widely used in the industry to value debt securities without relying exclusively on quoted prices for the specific securities but rather by relying on the securities’ relationship to other benchmark quoted securities. The Company’s available-for-sale securities that are traded on an active exchange, such as the New York Stock Exchange, are classified as Level 1. Available-for-sale securities valued using matrix pricing, which is a mathematical technique widely used in the industry to value debt securities without relying exclusively on quoted prices for the specific securities but rather by relying on the securities’ relationship to other benchmark quoted securities, are classified as Level 2. Investments valued using a discounted cash flow model are classified as Level 3. During 2009, two of the seven securities were sold and one was called at par. See Note 4.
F - 36
Table of Contents
NAUGATUCK VALLEY FINANCIAL CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Assets measured at fair value at December 31, 2010 are summarized below:
| December 31, 2010 Carrying Value |
||||||||||||||||
| (In thousands) |
Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Total | ||||||||||||
| Assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis: |
||||||||||||||||
| Available-for-sale investment securities |
$ | — | $ | 23,723 | $ | 7,960 | $ | 31,683 | ||||||||
| Residential loans held for sale |
— | 81 | — | 81 | ||||||||||||
| Assets measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis: |
||||||||||||||||
| Collateral dependent impaired loans |
$ | — | $ | 8,772 | $ | 16 | $ | 8,788 | ||||||||
| Foreclosed real estate and other repossessed assets |
— | — | 421 | 421 | ||||||||||||
Assets measured at fair value at December 31, 2009 are summarized below:
| December 31, 2009 Carrying Value |
||||||||||||||||
| (In thousands) |
Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Total | ||||||||||||
| Assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis: |
||||||||||||||||
| Available-for-sale investment securities |
$ | — | $ | 29,743 | $ | 7,880 | $ | 37,623 | ||||||||
| Residential loans held for sale |
— | — | — | — | ||||||||||||
| Assets measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis: |
||||||||||||||||
| Collateral dependent impaired loans |
$ | — | $ | 628 | $ | 18 | $ | 646 | ||||||||
| Foreclosed real estate |
— | — | 140 | 140 | ||||||||||||
Impaired loans are carried at fair value. Collateral dependent loans are considered Level 2, as the fair value is based on an appraisal prepared using observable inputs. Non-collateral dependent loans are measured using a discounted cash flow technique and are considered to be Level 3 estimates.
The following table shows a reconciliation of the beginning and ending balances for Level 3 assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis:
| (In thousands) |
2010 | 2009 | ||||||
| Balance at beginning of the year |
$ | 7,880 | $ | 6,744 | ||||
| New purchases |
— | |||||||
| Transfer to (from) level 3 |
80 | — | ||||||
| Increase in fair value of securities included in accumulated other comprehensive income |
— | 2,219 | ||||||
| Impairment charges included in net income |
— | — | ||||||
| Proceeds from sale of level 3 securities |
— | (83 | ) | |||||
| Redemptions at par |
— | (1,000 | ) | |||||
| Balance at end of the year |
$ | 7,960 | $ | 7,880 | ||||
| 18. | Subsequent Events |
On March 10, 2011, the Board of Directors of the MHC, the Company and the Bank adopted an amended and restated plan of conversion and reorganization, providing for the Company’s conversion to a fully public company by selling to the public the approximate 60% ownership interest in the Company currently held by Naugatuck Valley Mutual Holding Company, the Company’s Mutual Holding Company parent, in a transaction
F - 37
Table of Contents
NAUGATUCK VALLEY FINANCIAL CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
commonly referred to as a second step conversion. The conversion is subject to regulatory approval, the approval of the depositors of Naugatuck Valley Savings and Loan and the approval of the Company’s stockholders (including the holders of a majority of the Company’s outstanding shares of common stock, other than the Naugatuck Valley Mutual Holding Company). The conversion is expected to be completed in the third calendar quarter of 2011. If the conversion and offering are completed, eligible conversion and offering costs will be netted against the offering proceeds. If the conversion and offering are terminated, such costs will be expensed. As of December 31, 2010, the Company had incurred $600,572 in costs related to the conversion.
| 19. | Selected Quarterly Consolidated Financial Information (Unaudited) |
The following tables present quarterly consolidated information for the Company for 2010, 2009 and 2008.
| For the Year Ended December 31, 2010 | ||||||||||||||||
| (In thousands) |
Fourth Quarter |
Third Quarter |
Second Quarter |
First Quarter |
||||||||||||
| Interest and dividend income |
$ | 6,999 | $ | 7,211 | $ | 7,185 | $ | 7,143 | ||||||||
| Interest expense |
2,509 | 2,584 | 2,571 | 2,615 | ||||||||||||
| Net interest income |
4,490 | 4,627 | 4,614 | 4,528 | ||||||||||||
| Provision for loan losses |
1,197 | 993 | 361 | 809 | ||||||||||||
| Net interest income after provision for loan losses |
3,293 | 3,634 | 4,253 | 3,719 | ||||||||||||
| Noninterest income |
1,289 | 769 | 659 | 571 | ||||||||||||
| Noninterest expense |
4,358 | 3,776 | 3,919 | 3,854 | ||||||||||||
| Income before provision for income tax |
224 | 627 | 993 | 436 | ||||||||||||
| Provision for income tax |
(29 | ) | 423 | 313 | 122 | |||||||||||
| Net income |
$ | 253 | $ | 204 | $ | 680 | $ | 314 | ||||||||
| For the Year Ended December 31, 2009 | ||||||||||||||||
| (In thousands) |
Fourth Quarter |
Third Quarter |
Second Quarter |
First Quarter |
||||||||||||
| Interest and dividend income |
$ | 7,141 | $ | 7,055 | $ | 7,007 | $ | 7,088 | ||||||||
| Interest expense |
2,788 | 3,068 | 3,266 | 3,415 | ||||||||||||
| Net interest income |
4,353 | 3,987 | 3,741 | 3,673 | ||||||||||||
| Provision for loan losses |
285 | 302 | 272 | 285 | ||||||||||||
| Net interest income after provision for loan losses |
4,068 | 3,685 | 3,469 | 3,388 | ||||||||||||
| Noninterest income |
579 | 812 | 645 | 706 | ||||||||||||
| Noninterest expense |
3,664 | 3,483 | 3,796 | 3,598 | ||||||||||||
| Income before provision for income tax |
983 | 1,014 | 318 | 496 | ||||||||||||
| Provision for income tax |
301 | 311 | 79 | 127 | ||||||||||||
| Net income |
$ | 682 | $ | 703 | $ | 239 | $ | 369 | ||||||||
F - 38
Table of Contents
NAUGATUCK VALLEY FINANCIAL CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
| For the Year Ended December 31, 2008 | ||||||||||||||||
| (In thousands) |
Fourth Quarter |
Third Quarter |
Second Quarter |
First Quarter |
||||||||||||
| Interest and dividend income |
$ | 7,256 | $ | 7,224 | $ | 6,877 | $ | 6,846 | ||||||||
| Interest expense |
3,516 | 3,499 | 3,343 | 3,546 | ||||||||||||
| Net interest income |
3,740 | 3,725 | 3,534 | 3,300 | ||||||||||||
| Provision for loan losses |
200 | 200 | 113 | 162 | ||||||||||||
| Net interest income after provision for loan losses |
3,540 | 3,525 | 3,421 | 3,138 | ||||||||||||
| Noninterest income |
300 | (2,636 | ) | 661 | 627 | |||||||||||
| Noninterest expense |
3,539 | 3,453 | 3,257 | 3,205 | ||||||||||||
| Income (loss) before provision for income tax (benefit) |
301 | (2,564 | ) | 825 | 560 | |||||||||||
| Provision for income tax (benefit) |
(1,052 | ) | 157 | 223 | 106 | |||||||||||
| Net income (loss) |
$ | 1,353 | $ | (2,721 | ) | $ | 602 | $ | 454 | |||||||
| 20. | Parent Company Only Financial Statements |
The following financial statements are for the Company (Naugatuck Valley Financial Corporation) only, and should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements of the Company.
Statements of Financial Condition
| December 31, | ||||||||
| (In thousands) |
2010 | 2009 | ||||||
| ASSETS |
||||||||
| Cash on deposit with Naugatuck Valley Savings and Loan |
$ | 1,715 | $ | 2,434 | ||||
| Investment in subsidiary, Naugatuck Valley Savings and Loan |
45,867 | 43,171 | ||||||
| Investment securities |
1,245 | 1,624 | ||||||
| Loan to ESOP |
1,984 | 2,163 | ||||||
| Deferred income taxes |
— | 252 | ||||||
| Other assets |
1,479 | 671 | ||||||
| Total assets |
$ | 52,290 | $ | 50,315 | ||||
| LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY |
||||||||
| Liabilities |
$ | 31 | $ | 7 | ||||
| Stockholders’ equity |
52,259 | 50,308 | ||||||
| Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity |
$ | 52,290 | $ | 50,315 | ||||
F - 39
Table of Contents
NAUGATUCK VALLEY FINANCIAL CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Statements of Income
| For the Years Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
| (In thousands) |
2010 | 2009 | 2008 | |||||||||
| Interest income |
$ | 141 | $ | 181 | $ | 224 | ||||||
| Other income |
— | — | 1 | |||||||||
| Total income |
141 | 181 | 225 | |||||||||
| Other expense |
1,037 | 577 | 476 | |||||||||
| Income (loss) before income tax and equity in undistributed net income of subsidiary |
(896 | ) | (396 | ) | (251 | ) | ||||||
| Income tax (benefit) |
(54 | ) | (134 | ) | (85 | ) | ||||||
| Income (loss) before equity in undistributed net income of subsidiary |
(842 | ) | (262 | ) | (166 | ) | ||||||
| Equity in undistributed net income (loss) of subsidiary |
2,293 | 2,255 | (146 | ) | ||||||||
| Net income (loss) |
$ | 1,451 | $ | 1,993 | $ | (312 | ) | |||||
Statements of Cash flows
| For the Years Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
| (In thousands) |
2010 | 2009 | 2008 | |||||||||
| Net cash (used) provided by operating activities |
$ | (1,046 | ) | $ | 61 | $ | 240 | |||||
| Cash flows from investing activities |
||||||||||||
| Purchase of available-for-sale securities |
— | — | — | |||||||||
| Paydowns and maturities of available-for-sale securities |
382 | 689 | 497 | |||||||||
| Principal payments received from ESOP |
180 | 172 | 163 | |||||||||
| Net cash provided by investing activities |
562 | 861 | 660 | |||||||||
| Cash flows from financing activities |
||||||||||||
| Common stock repurchased |
(41 | ) | (25 | ) | (2,244 | ) | ||||||
| Cash dividends to common shareholders |
(317 | ) | (447 | ) | (614 | ) | ||||||
| Release of ESOP shares |
123 | 112 | 169 | |||||||||
| Net cash used by financing activities |
(235 | ) | (360 | ) | (2,689 | ) | ||||||
| Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
(719 | ) | 562 | (1,789 | ) | |||||||
| Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year |
2,434 | 1,872 | 3,661 | |||||||||
| Cash and cash equivalents at end of year |
$ | 1,715 | $ | 2,434 | $ | 1,872 | ||||||
F - 40
Table of Contents
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
| NAUGATUCK VALLEY FINANCIAL CORPORATION | ||||
| Date: March 14, 2011 | By: | /s/ John C. Roman | ||
| John C. Roman | ||||
| President and Chief Executive Officer | ||||
Pursuant to the requirements of the Exchange Act, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
| Name |
Title |
Date | ||
| /s/ John C. Roman John C. Roman |
President, Chief Executive Officer and Director |
March 14, 2011 | ||
| /s/ Lee R. Schlesinger Lee R. Schlesinger |
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
March 14, 2011 | ||
| /s/ Carlos S. Batista Carlos S. Batista |
Director | March 14, 2011 | ||
| /s/ Frederick A. Dlugokecki Frederick A. Dlugokecki |
Director | March 14, 2011 | ||
| /s/ Richard M. Famiglietti Richard M. Famiglietti |
Director | March 14, 2011 | ||
| /s/ James A. Mengacci James A. Mengacci |
Director | March 14, 2011 | ||
| /s/ Camilo P. Vieira Camilo P. Vieira |
Director | March 14, 2011 | ||
| /s/ Jane H. Walsh Jane H. Walsh |
Director | March 14, 2011 | ||