UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
|
|
|
þ |
|
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010
OR
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission file number 001-34605
OMNIAMERICAN BANCORP, INC.
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)
|
|
|
Maryland
|
|
27-0983595 |
|
|
|
(State or Other Jurisdiction of
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No. ) |
Incorporation or Organization) |
|
|
|
|
|
1320 S. University Drive, Fort Worth, Texas
|
|
76107 |
|
|
|
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)
|
|
(Zip Code) |
(817) 367-4640
(Telephone Number, including Area Code)
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
|
|
|
Title of Each Class
|
|
Name of Each Exchange on Which Registered |
Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share
|
|
The NASDAQ Stock Market, LLC |
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of
the Securities Act. Yes o No þ
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section
13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes o No þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject
to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter
period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes o No o
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is
not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrants knowledge, in
definitive proxy or information statement incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K
or any amendment to this Form 10-K. þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated
filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large
accelerated filer, accelerated filer, and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer o
|
|
Accelerated filer þ
|
|
Non-accelerated filer o
|
|
Smaller reporting company o |
|
|
|
|
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
|
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of
the Act). Yes o No þ
As of March 7, 2011, there were issued and outstanding 11,885,500 shares of the Registrants
Common Stock.
The aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates of the
Registrant, computed by reference to the last sale price on June 30, 2010 was $121,530,505.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE:
|
|
|
Document |
|
Part of Form 10-K |
|
|
|
Proxy Statement for the 2011 Annual Meeting of Stockholders of the Registrant
|
|
Part III |
OmniAmerican Bancorp, Inc.
Annual Report on Form 10-K
For The Year Ended
December 31, 2010
Table of Contents
i
PART I
Forward Looking Statements
This annual report contains forward-looking statements, which can be identified by the use of
words such as estimate, project, believe, intend, anticipate, plan, seek, expect,
will, may, and words of similar meaning. These forward-looking statements include, but are not
limited to:
|
|
|
statements of our goals, intentions, and expectations; |
|
|
|
statements regarding our business plans, prospects, growth, and operating
strategies; |
|
|
|
statements regarding the asset quality of our loan and investment portfolios; and |
|
|
|
estimates of our risks and future costs and benefits. |
These forward-looking statements are based on our current beliefs and expectations and are
inherently subject to significant business, economic, and competitive uncertainties and
contingencies, many of which are beyond our control. In addition, these forward-looking statements
are subject to assumptions with respect to future business strategies and decisions that are
subject to change. We are under no duty to and unless required under the federal securities laws,
we do not undertake any obligation to update any forward-looking statements after the date of this
annual report.
The following factors, among others, could cause actual results to differ materially from the
anticipated results or other expectations expressed in the forward-looking statements:
|
|
|
general economic conditions, either nationally or in our market areas, that are
worse than expected; |
|
|
|
competition among depository and other financial institutions; |
|
|
|
inflation and changes in the interest rate environment that reduce our margins or
reduce the fair value of financial instruments; |
|
|
|
adverse changes in the securities markets; |
|
|
|
changes in laws or government regulations or policies affecting financial
institutions, including changes in regulatory fees and capital requirements; |
|
|
|
our ability to enter new markets successfully and capitalize on growth
opportunities; |
|
|
|
our ability to successfully integrate acquired entities, if any; |
|
|
|
changes in consumer spending, borrowing, and savings habits; |
|
|
|
changes in accounting policies and practices, as may be adopted by the bank
regulatory agencies, the Financial Accounting Standards Board, the Securities and
Exchange Commission, and the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board; |
1
|
|
|
changes in our organization, compensation, and benefit plans; |
|
|
|
changes in our financial condition or results of operations that reduce capital
available to pay dividends; |
|
|
|
changes in the financial condition or future prospects of issuers of securities that
we own; and |
|
|
|
changes resulting from intense compliance and regulatory costs associated with the
Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (the Dodd-Frank Act) and
the pending elimination of the Office of Thrift Supervision as our primary regulator. |
Because of these and other uncertainties, our actual future results may be materially different
from the results indicated by these forward-looking statements.
OmniAmerican Bancorp, Inc.
OmniAmerican Bancorp, Inc. is the Maryland corporation that owns all of the outstanding shares
of common stock of OmniAmerican Bank. On January 20, 2010, we completed the mutual-to-stock
conversion of OmniAmerican Bank and initial public stock offering of OmniAmerican Bancorp, Inc.
OmniAmerican Bancorp, Inc. sold 11,902,500 shares raising $119.0 million in gross proceeds.
OmniAmerican Bancorp, Inc. received net proceeds from the offering of $115.5 million and loaned
$9.5 million to OmniAmerican Banks Employee Stock Purchase Plan to enable it to purchase 952,200
shares of common stock in the offering. OmniAmerican Bancorp, Inc. contributed $86.6 million of
the remaining net proceeds of $106.0 million to OmniAmerican Bank and the remainder was retained by
OmniAmerican Bancorp, Inc. to be utilized for general corporate purposes. Since the completion of
our initial public offering, we have not engaged in any significant business activity other than
owning the common stock of and having deposits in OmniAmerican Bank. At December 31, 2010, we had
consolidated assets of $1.11 billion, loans of $660.4 million, deposits of $801.2 million, and
stockholders equity of $198.6 million.
Our executive offices are located at 1320 South University Drive, Suite 900, Fort Worth, Texas
76107. Our telephone number at this address is (817) 367-4640.
OmniAmerican Bank
OmniAmerican Bank is a federally chartered savings bank headquartered in Fort Worth, Texas.
OmniAmerican Bank was originally chartered in 1956 as a federal credit union serving the active and
retired military personnel of Carswell Air Force Base. We completed the conversion from a Texas
credit union charter to a federal mutual savings bank charter as of January 1, 2006. The objective
of the charter conversion was to convert to a banking charter in order to carry out our business
strategy of broadening our banking services into residential real estate and commercial lending and
selling loans and servicing loans for others, which has allowed us to better serve the needs of our
customers and the local community.
Available Information
OmniAmerican Bancorp, Inc. is a public company and files interim, quarterly, and annual
reports with the Securities and Exchange Commission. These respective reports are on file and a
matter of public record with the Securities and Exchange Commission and may be read and copied at
the Securities and Exchange Commissions Public Reference Room at 450 Fifth Street, NW, Washington,
DC 20549. The public may obtain information on the operation of the Public Reference Room by
calling the Securities
and Exchange Commission at 1-800-SEC-0330. The Securities and Exchange Commission maintains
an Internet site that contains reports, proxy and information statements, and other information
regarding issuers that file electronically with the SEC (http://www.sec.gov).
2
Our website address is www.omniamerican.com. The reports we file with the Securities
and Exchange Commission may also be accessed through our website. Information on our website is
not incorporated into this annual report and should not be considered a part of this annual report.
General
Our principal business consists primarily of accepting deposits from the general public and
investing those deposits, together with funds generated from operations and borrowings, in mortgage
loans secured by residential real estate, consumer loans, consisting primarily of indirect
automobile loans (automobile loans referred to us by automobile dealerships), and to a lesser
extent, commercial real estate, real estate construction, commercial business loans, and direct
automobile loans. Since we completed our conversion from a credit union to a savings bank, we have
increased our residential real estate, real estate construction, commercial real estate, and
commercial business lending while deemphasizing our consumer lending activities. This trend
continued in 2010 as residential real estate loans comprised 44.6% of total loans and consumer
loans comprised 29.9% of total loans, respectively, at December 31, 2010.
Loans are originated from our main office in Fort Worth, Texas, and from our branch network in
the Dallas-Fort Worth Metroplex and surrounding communities in North Texas. We retain in our
portfolio all adjustable-rate loans that we originate, as well as fixed-rate one- to four-family
residential real estate loans with terms of 15 years or less. We currently sell most of the
long-term, fixed-rate one- to four-family residential real estate loans (terms greater than 15
years) that we originate either to the Federal National Mortgage Association (or Fannie Mae) on a
servicing-retained basis or into the secondary mortgage market on a servicing-released basis, in
order to generate fee income and for interest rate risk management purposes.
In addition to loans, we invest in a variety of investments, primarily government sponsored
mortgage-backed securities, and to a lesser extent, government sponsored collateralized mortgage
obligations, municipal obligations, agency bonds, and equity securities. We have in the past
invested in trust preferred securities issued by third parties and private-label collateralized
mortgage obligations, but this is not an integral part of our investment portfolio. At December
31, 2010, our investment securities portfolio had an amortized cost of $316.1 million.
We attract retail deposits from the general public in the areas surrounding our main office
and our branch offices. We offer a variety of deposit accounts, including noninterest-bearing and
interest-bearing demand accounts, savings accounts, money market accounts, and certificates of
deposit.
Our revenues are derived primarily from interest on loans, mortgage-backed securities, and
other investment securities. We also generate revenues from fees and service charges. Our primary
sources of funds are deposits, principal and interest payments on securities and loans, and
borrowings.
Market Area
Our primary market area includes consumers and businesses in the Dallas-Fort Worth Metroplex.
The total area of the Dallas-Fort Worth Metroplex is 9,103 square miles. Among nationwide
metropolitan areas, the Dallas-Fort Worth Metroplex ranked fourth in population with 6.5 million
residents and sixth in gross metropolitan product. The population of the Dallas-Fort Worth
Metroplex is
projected to grow by 10.1% over the five-year period from 2010 to 2015, increasing to 7.2
million. The population expansion in the Dallas-Fort Worth Metroplex exceeded the national and
state increases from 2000 to 2010, and is expected to continue this trend.
3
Like the national economy, the Texas economy has begun a slow recovery. The states economy
gained 230,800 jobs from December 2009 to December 2010, an annual job gain of 2.3%. However, the
states seasonally adjusted unemployment rate grew slightly from 8.2% in December 2009 to 8.3% in
December 2010. The Dallas-Fort Worth Metroplex unemployment rate rose from 8.0% in December 2009
to 8.6% in December 2010.
Generally, Texas has weathered the national real estate downturn without significantly lowered
property values. We believe this reflects low interest rates and low taxes, lower unemployment
than the national average, higher rates of job creation, a growing population, and the continued
affordability of Texas housing.
Decreases in energy prices during 2009 and continuing throughout 2010, particularly natural
gas prices, had an adverse effect on the Texas economy as a whole and resulted in the Texas state
government obtaining less tax revenue from the sale of natural gas. However, crude oil and natural
gas prices have improved significantly since the market lows in 2009. These price improvements
have helped stabilize the economic stress on the state economy which in turn affects our market
area.
Competition
We face intense competition in our market area both in making loans and attracting deposits.
We compete with commercial banks, savings institutions, mortgage brokerage firms, credit unions,
finance companies, mutual funds, insurance companies, and investment banking firms. Some of our
competitors have greater name recognition and market presence that benefit them in attracting
business, and offer certain services that we do not or cannot provide.
Our deposit sources are primarily concentrated in the communities surrounding our banking
offices, located in the Dallas-Fort Worth Metroplex and surrounding communities in North Texas. As
of June 30, 2010, we ranked 24th in FDIC-insured deposit market share (out of 181 bank and thrift
institutions with offices in the Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington, Texas, MSA) with a 0.52% market
share. Such data does not reflect deposits held by credit unions.
Lending Activities
Our principal lending activity is the origination of mortgage loans secured by residential
real estate, consumer loans, consisting primarily of indirect automobile loans, and to a lesser
extent, commercial real estate, real estate construction, commercial business, and direct
automobile loans.
4
Loan Portfolio Composition. The following table sets forth the composition of our loan
portfolio at the dates indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Percent |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Percent |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Percent |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Percent |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Percent |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Residential real estate loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One- to four-family(1) |
|
$ |
271,792 |
|
|
|
40.60 |
% |
|
$ |
257,265 |
|
|
|
36.35 |
% |
|
$ |
245,554 |
|
|
|
33.96 |
% |
|
$ |
210,475 |
|
|
|
29.60 |
% |
|
$ |
164,585 |
|
|
|
22.52 |
% |
Home equity(2) |
|
|
26,670 |
|
|
|
3.98 |
|
|
|
28,526 |
|
|
|
4.03 |
|
|
|
27,180 |
|
|
|
3.76 |
|
|
|
21,183 |
|
|
|
2.98 |
|
|
|
19,241 |
|
|
|
2.63 |
|
Commercial loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial real estate |
|
|
87,887 |
|
|
|
13.13 |
|
|
|
100,985 |
|
|
|
14.27 |
|
|
|
89,023 |
|
|
|
12.31 |
|
|
|
81,953 |
|
|
|
11.53 |
|
|
|
74,216 |
|
|
|
10.16 |
|
Real estate construction |
|
|
34,502 |
|
|
|
5.15 |
|
|
|
36,843 |
|
|
|
5.20 |
|
|
|
45,840 |
|
|
|
6.34 |
|
|
|
43,003 |
|
|
|
6.05 |
|
|
|
28,840 |
|
|
|
3.95 |
|
Commercial business |
|
|
48,733 |
|
|
|
7.28 |
|
|
|
59,325 |
|
|
|
8.38 |
|
|
|
50,975 |
|
|
|
7.05 |
|
|
|
34,884 |
|
|
|
4.91 |
|
|
|
11,616 |
|
|
|
1.59 |
|
Consumer loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Automobile, indirect |
|
|
156,708 |
|
|
|
23.41 |
|
|
|
176,775 |
|
|
|
24.98 |
|
|
|
209,371 |
|
|
|
28.95 |
|
|
|
258,782 |
|
|
|
36.39 |
|
|
|
359,428 |
|
|
|
49.19 |
|
Automobile, direct |
|
|
24,523 |
|
|
|
3.66 |
|
|
|
28,722 |
|
|
|
4.06 |
|
|
|
34,824 |
|
|
|
4.82 |
|
|
|
37,687 |
|
|
|
5.30 |
|
|
|
45,252 |
|
|
|
6.19 |
|
Unsecured |
|
|
13,416 |
|
|
|
2.00 |
|
|
|
14,323 |
|
|
|
2.02 |
|
|
|
14,505 |
|
|
|
2.00 |
|
|
|
15,991 |
|
|
|
2.25 |
|
|
|
17,381 |
|
|
|
2.38 |
|
Other |
|
|
5,287 |
|
|
|
0.79 |
|
|
|
5,001 |
|
|
|
0.71 |
|
|
|
5,832 |
|
|
|
0.81 |
|
|
|
7,048 |
|
|
|
0.99 |
|
|
|
10,169 |
|
|
|
1.39 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans |
|
|
669,518 |
|
|
|
100.00 |
% |
|
|
707,765 |
|
|
|
100.00 |
% |
|
|
723,104 |
|
|
|
100.00 |
% |
|
|
711,006 |
|
|
|
100.00 |
% |
|
|
730,728 |
|
|
|
100.00 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other items: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unearned fees and discounts, net |
|
|
(161 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,310 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
940 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,479 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,168 |
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan losses |
|
|
(8,932 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8,328 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8,270 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,386 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,049 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans, net |
|
$ |
660,425 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
698,127 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
715,774 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
707,099 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
728,847 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Excludes loans held for sale of $861,000, $241,000, $160,000, $253,000, and $919,000 at
December 31, 2010, 2009, 2008, 2007, and 2006, respectively. |
|
(2) |
|
Included in home equity loans are home equity lines of credit totaling $886,000, $1.1
million, $1.9 million, $993,000, and $970,000 at December 31, 2010, 2009, 2008, 2007, and
2006, respectively. |
5
Loan Portfolio Maturities and Yields. The following table summarizes the scheduled
repayments of our loan portfolio at December 31, 2010. Demand loans, loans having no stated
repayment schedule or maturity, and overdraft loans are reported as being due in one year or less.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One- to Four-Family Real |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estate |
|
|
Home Equity |
|
|
Commercial Real Estate |
|
|
Real Estate Construction |
|
|
Commercial Business |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Rate |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Rate |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Rate |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Rate |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Rate |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Due During the
Years Ending
December 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011 |
|
$ |
1,201 |
|
|
|
5.82 |
% |
|
$ |
880 |
|
|
|
3.67 |
% |
|
$ |
17,875 |
|
|
|
6.55 |
% |
|
$ |
17,791 |
|
|
|
5.98 |
% |
|
$ |
16,916 |
|
|
|
6.37 |
% |
2012 |
|
|
166 |
|
|
|
6.84 |
|
|
|
165 |
|
|
|
7.05 |
|
|
|
12,369 |
|
|
|
5.97 |
|
|
|
8,948 |
|
|
|
5.85 |
|
|
|
3,237 |
|
|
|
7.27 |
|
2013 |
|
|
622 |
|
|
|
5.95 |
|
|
|
566 |
|
|
|
6.55 |
|
|
|
4,881 |
|
|
|
4.89 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,331 |
|
|
|
6.09 |
|
2014 to 2015 |
|
|
2,036 |
|
|
|
6.42 |
|
|
|
1,254 |
|
|
|
6.52 |
|
|
|
8,710 |
|
|
|
5.86 |
|
|
|
358 |
|
|
|
6.25 |
|
|
|
11,202 |
|
|
|
4.71 |
|
2016 to 2020 |
|
|
26,137 |
|
|
|
5.13 |
|
|
|
5,055 |
|
|
|
6.64 |
|
|
|
17,873 |
|
|
|
6.01 |
|
|
|
5,621 |
|
|
|
6.37 |
|
|
|
11,757 |
|
|
|
7.14 |
|
2021 to 2025 |
|
|
54,878 |
|
|
|
4.83 |
|
|
|
7,361 |
|
|
|
7.22 |
|
|
|
8,563 |
|
|
|
6.51 |
|
|
|
459 |
|
|
|
6.18 |
|
|
|
1,290 |
|
|
|
6.89 |
|
2026 and beyond |
|
|
186,752 |
|
|
|
6.24 |
|
|
|
11,389 |
|
|
|
6.74 |
|
|
|
17,616 |
|
|
|
6.42 |
|
|
|
1,325 |
|
|
|
5.43 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
271,792 |
|
|
|
5.85 |
% |
|
$ |
26,670 |
|
|
|
6.74 |
% |
|
$ |
87,887 |
|
|
|
6.17 |
% |
|
$ |
34,502 |
|
|
|
5.99 |
% |
|
$ |
48,733 |
|
|
|
6.22 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Automobile, Indirect |
|
|
Automobile, Direct |
|
|
Unsecured Consumer |
|
|
Other Consumer |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Rate |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Rate |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Rate |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Rate |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Rate |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Due During the
Years Ending
December 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011 |
|
$ |
5,113 |
|
|
|
6.94 |
% |
|
$ |
952 |
|
|
|
7.60 |
% |
|
$ |
8,232 |
|
|
|
6.73 |
% |
|
$ |
3,609 |
|
|
|
3.60 |
% |
|
$ |
72,569 |
|
|
|
6.24 |
% |
2012 |
|
|
12,073 |
|
|
|
7.22 |
|
|
|
3,150 |
|
|
|
6.60 |
|
|
|
1,348 |
|
|
|
12.16 |
|
|
|
189 |
|
|
|
8.63 |
|
|
|
41,645 |
|
|
|
6.68 |
|
2013 |
|
|
21,243 |
|
|
|
6.83 |
|
|
|
5,785 |
|
|
|
6.07 |
|
|
|
1,378 |
|
|
|
12.88 |
|
|
|
201 |
|
|
|
8.81 |
|
|
|
39,007 |
|
|
|
6.60 |
|
2014 to 2015 |
|
|
76,911 |
|
|
|
7.57 |
|
|
|
12,515 |
|
|
|
5.61 |
|
|
|
2,440 |
|
|
|
13.52 |
|
|
|
444 |
|
|
|
9.76 |
|
|
|
115,870 |
|
|
|
7.05 |
|
2016 to 2020 |
|
|
41,368 |
|
|
|
7.62 |
|
|
|
2,121 |
|
|
|
5.23 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
13.28 |
|
|
|
742 |
|
|
|
9.48 |
|
|
|
110,692 |
|
|
|
6.58 |
|
2021 to 2025 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
102 |
|
|
|
9.61 |
|
|
|
72,653 |
|
|
|
5.32 |
|
2026 and beyond |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
217,082 |
|
|
|
6.28 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
156,708 |
|
|
|
7.44 |
% |
|
$ |
24,523 |
|
|
|
5.89 |
% |
|
$ |
13,416 |
|
|
|
9.15 |
% |
|
$ |
5,287 |
|
|
|
5.44 |
% |
|
$ |
669,518 |
|
|
|
6.40 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6
The following table sets forth the scheduled repayments of fixed- and adjustable-rate
loans at December 31, 2010 that are contractually due after December 31, 2011. For purposes of the
table, adjustable-rate loans include adjustable-rate mortgages with initial fixed-rate periods of
three to seven years.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Due After December 31, 2011 |
|
|
|
Fixed |
|
|
Adjustable |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential real estate loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One- to four-family |
|
$ |
228,165 |
|
|
$ |
42,426 |
|
|
$ |
270,591 |
|
Home equity |
|
|
19,480 |
|
|
|
6,310 |
|
|
|
25,790 |
|
Commercial loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial real estate |
|
|
25,277 |
|
|
|
44,735 |
|
|
|
70,012 |
|
Real estate construction |
|
|
3,852 |
|
|
|
12,859 |
|
|
|
16,711 |
|
Commercial business |
|
|
9,422 |
|
|
|
22,395 |
|
|
|
31,817 |
|
Consumer loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Automobile, indirect |
|
|
151,595 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
151,595 |
|
Automobile, direct |
|
|
23,571 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,571 |
|
Unsecured |
|
|
5,184 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,184 |
|
Other |
|
|
1,678 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,678 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans |
|
$ |
468,224 |
|
|
$ |
128,725 |
|
|
$ |
596,949 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One- to Four-Family Residential Real Estate Loans. At December 31, 2010, $271.8 million,
or 40.6% of our total loan portfolio consisted of one- to four-family residential real estate
loans. We offer residential real estate loans that conform to Fannie Mae underwriting standards
(conforming loans) and non-conforming loans. We generally underwrite our one- to four-family
residential real estate loans based on the applicants employment and credit history and the
appraised value of the subject property. Our loans have fixed-rates and adjustable-rates, with
maturities of up to 30 years, and maximum loan amounts generally of up to $1.0 million. As of
December 31, 2010, less than 1% of our one- to four-family residential real estate loans had
balances over $1.0 million. At December 31, 2010, fixed-rate one- to four-family residential real
estate loans totaled $229.4 million and adjustable-rate one- to four-family residential real estate
loans totaled $42.4 million.
We currently offer fixed-rate conventional mortgage loans with terms of up to 30 years that
are fully amortizing with monthly loan payments and adjustable-rate mortgage loans that provide an
initial fixed interest rate for three, five, or seven years and that amortize over a period up to
30 years. We do not offer discounted or teaser rates on our adjustable-rate mortgage loans.
Our one- to four-family residential real estate loans are generally conforming loans,
underwritten according to Fannie Mae guidelines. We originate both fixed- and adjustable-rate
mortgage loans in amounts up to the maximum general conforming loan limits as established by the
Federal Housing Finance Agency for Fannie Mae and the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (or
Freddie Mac), which is currently $417,000 for single-family homes. At December 31, 2010, 3.6% of
our one- to four-family residential real estate loans had principal balances in excess of $417,000.
At that date, our average one- to four-family residential real estate loan had a principal balance
of $127,363. In the current low interest rate environment, most borrowers have preferred
fixed-rate loans to our adjustable-rate loan products. We also originate loans above the lending
limit for conforming loans, which we refer to as jumbo loans. We only originate fixed-rate jumbo
loans with terms of up to 30 years and adjustable-rate jumbo loans with an initial fixed-rate
period of three, five, or seven years and which adjust annually. At December 31, 2010, our largest
one- to four-family residential real estate loan had an outstanding balance of $3.3 million, was
secured by a single-family residence, and was identified as impaired in 2009. The loan was
restructured in October 2009 to reduce the interest rate and was performing in accordance with the
restructured terms at December 31, 2010. As of December 31, 2010, we had a specific valuation
allowance of $131,000 for this loan.
7
We will originate loans with loan-to-value ratios in excess of 80%, provided that, with
limited exceptions, the borrower obtains private mortgage insurance. We generally will not
originate loans with a loan-to-value ratio in excess of 95%. As of December 31, 2010, $39.9
million, or 14.7%, of our residential loan portfolio had loan-to-value ratios in excess of 80%.
We actively monitor our interest rate risk position to determine the desirable level of
investment in fixed-rate mortgages. We retain in our portfolio fixed-rate one- to four-family
residential real estate loans with terms of 15 years or less. We currently sell most of our
long-term, fixed-rate one- to four-family residential real estate loans (terms greater than 15
years) that we originate into the secondary mortgage market to government sponsored entities, such
as Fannie Mae, or other purchasers. Such loans are sold without recourse. We generally retain the
servicing rights on all loans sold to Fannie Mae in order to generate fee income and reinforce our
relationship with our customers. For the year ended December 31, 2010, we received servicing fees
of $319,000. As of December 31, 2010, the principal balance of loans serviced for others totaled
$122.5 million.
We currently offer several types of adjustable-rate mortgage loans secured by residential
properties with interest rates that are fixed for an initial period ranging from three to seven
years. We offer adjustable-rate mortgage loans that are fully amortizing. After the initial fixed
period, the interest rate on adjustable-rate mortgage loans is generally reset every year based
upon a contractual spread or margin above the average yield on U.S. Treasury securities, adjusted
to a constant maturity of one year, as published weekly by the Federal Reserve Board, subject to
periodic and lifetime limitations on interest rate changes. Generally, the initial change in
interest rates on our adjustable-rate mortgage loans cannot exceed two percentage points.
Subsequent interest rate changes cannot exceed two percentage points and total interest rate
changes cannot exceed six percentage points over the life of the loan.
Adjustable-rate mortgage loans generally present different credit risks than fixed-rate
mortgage loans, primarily because the underlying debt service payments of the borrowers increase as
interest rates increase, thereby increasing the potential for default and higher rates of
delinquency. At the same time, the marketability of the underlying collateral may be adversely
affected by higher interest rates. Since changes in the interest rates on adjustable-rate
mortgages may be limited by an initial fixed-rate period or by the contractual limits on periodic
interest rate adjustments, adjustable-rate loans may not adjust as quickly to increases in interest
rates as our interest-bearing liabilities.
A portion of our one- to four-family residential real estate loan portfolio has higher risk
characteristics. We have internally originated and purchased the loans in this portfolio. This
portfolio consists of subprime loans (those loans made to borrowers with no established credit
scores or credit scores of 660 or less and some additional credit weakness), stated income loans
(the reasonableness of which was verified through sources other than the borrower) and
interest-only loans (loans which typically provide for the payment of interest only for a fixed
period of time, thereafter the loan payments adjust to include both principal and interest for the
remaining term). At December 31, 2010, the outstanding balance of our subprime one- to
four-family residential real estate loans totaled $40.3 million, or 14.8% of our one- to
four-family residential real estate loans and 6.0% of our total loans. Included in this balance
are $24.8 million in loans made to borrowers who are resident aliens and have no established
credit scores. These loans were originated consistent with our commitment under the Community
Reinvestment Act to help provide credit to the low and moderate income segment of our community.
At December 31, 2010, the outstanding balance of our one- to four-family residential real estate
loans also included $12.1 million of stated income loans and $7.1 million in interest-only loans
(of which $3.0 million were also stated income loans). At December 31, 2010, one of our subprime
one- to four-family residential real estate loans with a balance of $268,000 was over 60 days past
due. For the year ended December 31, 2010, three subprime loans with balances totaling $550,000
were foreclosed.
In addition, three of the loans in the subprime portfolio with balances totaling $1.0 million
had been restructured or modified as of December 31, 2010.
8
In 2008, we began purchasing one- to four-family residential real estate loans, which
included subprime, stated income, and interest-only loans, at a discount to the original principal
balance of the loan. As of December 31, 2010, the total outstanding balance of all purchased one-
to four-family residential real estate loans was $23.9 million, or 8.8% of our one- to four-family
residential real estate loans and 3.6% of our total loans, while the carrying value of such loans,
net of purchase discounts, was $20.4 million. Our purchased one- to four-family residential real
estate loans included $4.0 million of subprime loans as of December 31, 2010. In addition, these
purchased one- to four-family residential real estate loans included $11.2 million of stated
income loans and $4.6 million of interest-only loans (of which $3.0 million were also stated
income loans). At December 31, 2010, the purchased subprime, stated income, and interest-only
loans represented 1.5%, 4.1%, and 1.7%, respectively, of our total one- to four-family residential
real estate loans. We may purchase subprime, stated income, and interest-only loans as market
conditions permit, and if we are able to obtain the loans at a sufficient discount to the loan
balance to compensate us for the added risk associated with such loans.
At December 31, 2010, our internally originated one- to four-family residential loans
included $36.3 million of subprime loans, $2.5 million of interest-only loans, and $923,000 of
stated income loans. These loans represent 13.4%, 0.9%, and 0.3%, respectively, of our total one-
to four-family residential real estate loans. We intend to continue to originate these types of
loans in the future as market conditions permit.
We do not offer or purchase loans that provide for negative amortization of principal, such
as Option ARM loans, where the borrower can pay less than the interest owed on their loan,
resulting in an increased principal balance during the life of the loan.
We require title insurance on all of our one- to four-family residential real estate loans
that exceed $100,000 and we also require that borrowers maintain fire and extended coverage
casualty insurance (and, if appropriate, flood insurance) in an amount at least equal to the
lesser of the loan balance or the replacement cost of the improvements. We do not conduct
environmental testing on residential real estate loans unless specific concerns for hazards are
identified by the appraiser used in connection with the origination of the loan.
During the year ended December 31, 2010, we had a total of 16 foreclosures in our one- to
four-family residential real estate loan portfolio with principal balances of the foreclosed loans
totaling $3.3 million.
Home Equity Loans and Lines of Credit. In addition to traditional one- to four-family
residential real estate loans, we offer home equity loans and home equity lines of credit that are
secured by the borrowers primary residence. Our home equity loans are primarily originated with
fixed rates of interest with terms of up to 30 years. Home equity loans and lines of credit are
generally underwritten using the same criteria that we use to underwrite one- to four-family
residential real estate loans. Home equity loans may be underwritten with a loan-to-value ratio of
80% when combined with the principal balance of the existing mortgage loan, while lines of credit
for owner-occupied properties may be underwritten with loan-to-value ratios of 80% of the market
value of the single-family residence inclusive of all other debt, and the credit limit cannot
exceed 50% of the market value when combined with the principal balance of the existing mortgage
loan. Home equity lines of credit are generally originated with adjustable rates of interest. The
maximum maturity period is 20 years with a five-year period to draw
funds. At the time we close a home equity loan or line of credit, we record a deed of trust
to perfect our security interest in the underlying collateral. At December 31, 2010, the
outstanding balance of home equity loans totaled $25.8 million, or 3.9% of our total loan
portfolio, and the outstanding balance of home equity lines of credit totaled $886,000 million, or
0.1% of our total loan portfolio.
9
Home equity loans secured by second mortgages have greater risk than residential real estate
loans secured by first mortgages. We face the risk that the collateral will be insufficient to
compensate us for loan losses and costs of foreclosure. When customers default on their loans, we
attempt to foreclose on the property and resell the property as soon as possible to minimize
foreclosure and carrying costs. However, the value of the collateral may not be sufficient to
compensate us for the amount of the unpaid loan and we may be unsuccessful in recovering the
remaining balance from those customers. Particularly with respect to our home equity loans,
decreases in real estate values could adversely affect the value of property used as collateral for
our loans.
Commercial Real Estate Loans. We originate commercial real estate loans secured primarily by
office buildings, hotels, strip mall centers, apartment buildings, condominiums, developed lots,
and raw land. Loans secured by commercial real estate totaled $87.9 million, or 13.1% of our total
loan portfolio, at December 31, 2010, and consisted of 181 loans outstanding with an average loan
balance of approximately $486,000 for the year ended December 31, 2010. Substantially all of the
commercial real estate loans that we originate are secured by properties located in Texas.
Our commercial real estate loans are generally written up to terms of five years with
adjustable interest rates. The rates are generally tied to the prime rate as reported in The Wall
Street Journal and generally have a specified floor. Many of our adjustable-rate commercial real
estate loans are not fully amortizing and therefore require a balloon payment at maturity. We
also originate 15- to 20-year fixed rate, fully amortizing commercial real estate loans. A portion
of our commercial real estate loans are loans that we have provided permanent financing for
borrowers following the completion of the real estate construction for which we previously provided
construction financing.
In underwriting commercial real estate loans, we generally lend up to 85% of the propertys
appraised value and up to 65% of the propertys appraised value if the property is unimproved land.
We base our decisions to lend on the economic viability of the property and the creditworthiness
of the borrower. In evaluating a proposed commercial real estate loan, we emphasize the ratio of
the propertys projected net cash flow to the loans debt service requirement (generally requiring
a minimum ratio of 120%), computed after deduction for a vacancy factor and property expenses we
deem appropriate. Personal guarantees are usually obtained from commercial real estate borrowers.
We require title insurance insuring the priority of our lien, fire and extended coverage casualty
insurance, and, if appropriate, flood insurance, in order to protect our security interest in the
underlying property.
Commercial real estate loans generally carry higher interest rates and have shorter terms than
one- to four-family residential real estate loans. Commercial real estate loans, however, entail
significant additional credit risks compared to one- to four-family residential real estate loans,
as they typically involve larger loan balances concentrated with single borrowers or groups of
related borrowers. In addition, the payment of loans secured by income-producing properties
typically depends on the successful operation of the related real estate project and thus may be
subject to a greater extent to adverse conditions in the real estate market and in the general
economy. At December 31, 2010, our largest commercial real estate loan had an outstanding balance
of $5.2 million, was secured by residential lots, and was performing in accordance with its terms
as of that date.
Real Estate Construction Loans. We originate real estate construction loans for the
construction of single-family residences, condominiums, office buildings, hotels, and retail strip
centers. Construction loans are offered to individuals for the construction of their personal
residences (owner-occupied) and to
qualified developers. At December 31, 2010, real estate construction loans totaled $34.5
million, or 5.2% of total loans. At December 31, 2010, the commitment to advance additional
amounts on these real estate construction loans totaled $3.5 million.
10
We grant construction loans to area builders. In the case of residential subdivisions, these
loans finance the cost of completing homes. Advances on construction loans are made in accordance
with a schedule reflecting the cost of construction, but are generally limited to the lower of 100%
of actual construction costs or 85% of the completed appraised value. Repayment of construction
loans on residential subdivisions is normally expected from the sale of units to individual
purchasers. In the case of income-producing property, repayment is usually expected from permanent
financing upon completion of construction.
Before making a commitment to fund a construction loan, we require an appraisal of the
property by an independent licensed appraiser. We generally also review and inspect each property
before disbursement of funds during the term of the construction loan. We typically make
construction loans only to developers with whom we have an existing relationship or who are known
to us.
Construction financing generally involves greater credit risk than long-term financing on
improved, owner-occupied real estate. Risk of loss on a construction loan depends largely upon the
accuracy of the initial estimate of the value of the property at completion of construction
compared to the estimated cost (including interest) of construction and other assumptions. If the
estimate of construction cost proves to be inaccurate, we may be required to advance additional
funds beyond the amount originally committed in order to protect the value of the property.
Moreover, if the estimated value of the completed project proves to be inaccurate, the borrower may
hold a property with a value that is insufficient to assure full repayment of the construction loan
upon the sale of the property. In the event we make a land acquisition loan on property that is
not yet approved for the planned development, there is the risk that approvals will not be granted
or will be delayed. Construction loans also expose us to the risk that improvements will not be
completed on time in accordance with specifications and projected costs. In addition, the ultimate
sale or rental of the property may not occur as anticipated. At December 31, 2010, our largest
real estate construction loan had an outstanding balance of $9.6 million, was secured by
multi-family condominium units and was performing in accordance with its terms as of that date. We
identified the loan as impaired due to slow sales of the condominium units as of December 31, 2010
and a specific valuation allowance of $611,000 was established for this loan.
Commercial Business Loans. We make various types of secured and unsecured commercial business
loans to customers in our market area for the purpose of acquiring equipment and other general
business purposes. The terms of these loans generally range from one year to a maximum of 10
years. The loans are either negotiated on a fixed-rate basis or carry adjustable interest rates
indexed to the prime rate as reported in The Wall Street Journal and generally with specified
floors. At December 31, 2010, we had 196 commercial business loans outstanding with an aggregate
balance of $48.7 million, or 7.3% of our total loans. For the year ended December 31, 2010, the
average commercial business loan balance was approximately $249,000. At December 31, 2010, we had
$412,000 in unsecured commercial business loans.
We have in the past purchased participation interests in shared national credits, which are
adjustable-rate loans generally tied to the London InterBank Offered Rate (LIBOR) where a larger
financial institution serves as the lead lender and credit is extended to a large business secured
by business assets or equipment. Historically, the minimum participation amount has been $5.0
million. At December 31, 2010, we had one participation interest in shared national credits of
$4.7 million. We are no longer purchasing shared national credit loans. We intend to focus our
commercial business lending on small-to-medium size businesses in our local market area.
11
Commercial credit decisions are based upon our credit assessment of the borrower and the
underlying business. We determine the borrowers ability to repay in accordance with the proposed
terms of the loan and we assess the risks involved. An evaluation is made of the borrower to
determine character and capacity to manage the borrowers business. Personal guarantees of the
principals of a borrower are usually obtained. In addition to evaluating the borrowers financial
statements, we consider the adequacy of the primary and secondary sources of repayment for the
loan. Credit agency reports of the guarantors credit history supplement our analysis of the
borrowers creditworthiness. We may also check with other banks and conduct trade investigations.
Collateral supporting a secured transaction also is analyzed to determine its marketability.
Commercial business loans generally have higher interest rates than residential real estate loans
of like duration because they have a higher risk of default since their repayment generally depends
on the successful operation of the borrowers business and the sufficiency of any collateral. Our
pricing of commercial business loans is based primarily on the credit risk of the borrower, with
due consideration given to borrowers with an appropriate deposit relationship. At December 31,
2010, our largest internally originated commercial business loan had an outstanding balance of $6.3
million, was secured by notes receivable and was performing in accordance with its terms as of that
date.
Consumer Lending. We offer a variety of secured consumer loans, including new and used
automobile loans, recreational vehicle loans, and loans secured by savings deposits. We also offer
unsecured consumer loans. We originate our consumer loans primarily in our market areas. Most of
our consumer loans are secured by automobiles. At December 31, 2010, our consumer loan portfolio
totaled $199.9 million, or 29.9% of our total loan portfolio. We originate automobile loans on a
direct and indirect basis. Automobile loans totaled $181.2 million at December 31, 2010, or 27.1%
of our total loan portfolio, with $156.7 million in indirect loans and $24.5 million in direct
loans.
We acquire our indirect automobile loans from approximately 121 dealers located primarily in
our market area under an arrangement providing for a premium for any amount over the interest rate
to be paid to the referring dealer. Approximately 56.4% of the aggregate principal balance of our
automobile loan portfolio as of December 31, 2010 was for new vehicles and the remainder was for
used vehicles. The weighted average original term to maturity of our automobile loan portfolio at
December 31, 2010 was five years and seven months. The average outstanding balance of our
automobile loans for the year ended December 31, 2010 was $13,677 and the average credit score was
740. More than 97.6% of the aggregate principal balance of our automobile loan portfolio as of
December 31, 2010 consisted of loans to borrowers with mailing addresses in the State of Texas. We
have been in the business of providing indirect automobile financing since 1992.
Each dealer that originates automobile loans makes representations and warranties with respect
to our security interests in the related financed vehicles in a separate dealer agreement with us.
These representations and warranties do not relate to the creditworthiness of the borrowers or the
collectability of the loan. The dealers are also responsible for ensuring that our security
interest in the financed vehicles is perfected.
Each automobile loan requires the borrower to keep the financed vehicle fully insured against
loss or damage by fire, theft, and collision. The dealer agreements require the dealers to
represent that adequate physical damage insurance (collision and comprehensive) was in effect at
the time the related loan was originated and financed by us. In addition, we have the right to
force place insurance coverage (supplemental insurance taken out by OmniAmerican Bank) in the event
the required physical damage insurance on an automobile is not maintained by the borrower.
Nevertheless, there can be no assurance that each financed vehicle will continue to be covered by
physical damage insurance provided by the borrower during the entire term during which the related
loan is outstanding.
12
Each dealer submits credit applications directly to us and the borrowers creditworthiness is
the most important criterion we use in determining whether to purchase an automobile loan from a
dealer. Each credit application requires that the borrower provide current information regarding
the borrowers employment history, debts, and other factors that bear on creditworthiness. We
generally apply uniform underwriting standards when originating the automobile loan. We also
typically obtain a credit report from a major credit reporting agency summarizing the borrowers
credit history and paying habits, including such items as open accounts, delinquent payments,
bankruptcies, repossessions, lawsuits, and judgments.
The borrowers credit score is the principal factor used in determining the interest rate on
the loan. Our underwriting procedure evaluates information relating to the borrower and supplied
by the borrower on the credit application combined with information provided by credit reporting
agencies and the amount to be financed relative to the value of the related financed vehicle.
Additionally, our underwriters may also verify a borrowers employment income and/or residency or
where appropriate, verify a borrowers payment history directly with the borrowers creditors.
Based on these procedures, a credit decision is considered and approved either automatically or by
our personnel at various levels of authority. We generally follow the same underwriting guidelines
in originating direct automobile loans.
Our primary consideration when originating an automobile loan is the borrowers ability to
repay the loan and the value of the underlying collateral. We generally finance up to the full
sales price of the vehicle plus sales tax, dealer preparation fees, license fees, and title fees,
plus the cost of service and warranty contracts and premiums for physical damage, credit life and
disability insurance obtained in connection with the vehicle or the financing (amounts in addition
to the sales price are collectively referred to as the Additional Vehicle Costs). In addition,
we may finance the negative equity related to the vehicle traded in by the borrower in connection
with the financing. Accordingly, the amount we finance may exceed, depending on the borrowers
credit score, in the case of new vehicles, the dealers invoice price of the financed vehicle and
the Additional Vehicle Costs, or in the case of a used vehicle, the vehicles value and the
Additional Vehicle Costs. The maximum amount borrowed generally may not exceed 125% of the full
sales price of the financed vehicle that is new, or the vehicles wholesale value in the case of
a used vehicle, including Additional Vehicle Costs. The vehicles value is determined by using one
of the standard reference sources for dealers of used cars. We regularly review the quality of the
loans we purchase from the dealers and periodically conduct quality control audits to ensure
compliance with our established policies and procedures.
At December 31, 2010, our automobile loans to borrowers with credit scores of 660 or less
totaled $13.5 million or 7.5% of our total automobile loan portfolio. We typically will not
originate these types of loans with loan-to-value ratios greater than 110%. We also consider the
applicants employment history and we may charge a higher interest rate.
Our secured consumer loans totaled $5.3 million, or 0.8% of our total loan portfolio, at
December 31, 2010, and consisted principally of deposit secured loans. We also originate unsecured
consumer loans. At December 31, 2010, our unsecured consumer loans totaled $13.4 million, or 2.0%
of our total loan portfolio. These loans have either a fixed rate of interest for a maximum term
of 60 months or are revolving lines of credit with an adjustable-rate of interest tied to the prime
rate of interest as reported in The Wall Street Journal. At December 31, 2010, unfunded
commitments on our unsecured lines of credit totaled $7.3 million and the average outstanding
balance on our lines was approximately $4,950 for the year ended December 31, 2010.
Consumer loans generally have shorter terms to maturity, which reduces our exposure to changes
in interest rates. In addition, management believes that offering consumer loan products helps to
expand and create stronger ties to our existing customer base by increasing the number of customer
relationships and providing cross-marketing opportunities.
13
Consumer and other loans generally have greater risk compared to longer-term loans secured by
improved, owner-occupied real estate, particularly consumer loans that are secured by rapidly
depreciable assets, such as automobiles. In these cases, any repossessed collateral for a
defaulted loan may not provide an adequate source of repayment of the outstanding loan balance. As
a result, consumer loan collections are dependent on the borrowers continuing financial stability
and thus are more likely to be adversely affected by job loss, divorce, illness, or personal
bankruptcy. Furthermore, our consumer loan portfolio contains a substantial number of indirect
automobile loans where we assume the risk that the automobile dealership underwriting the loans
complies with federal, state, and local consumer protection laws.
Loan Originations, Purchases, Sales, Participations, and Servicing. Lending activities are
conducted primarily by our loan personnel operating at our main and branch office locations. All
loans that we originate are underwritten pursuant to our policies and procedures. In addition, our
one- to four-family residential real estate loans generally incorporate Fannie Mae underwriting
guidelines. We originate both adjustable-rate and fixed-rate loans. Our ability to originate
fixed- or adjustable-rate loans is dependent upon the relative customer demand for such loans,
which is affected by current market interest rates as well as anticipated future market interest
rates. Our loan origination and sales activity may be adversely affected by a rising interest rate
environment that typically results in decreased loan demand. Most of our commercial real estate
and commercial business loans are generated by referrals from professional contacts. Most of our
originations of one- to four-family residential real estate loans, consumer loans, and home equity
loans are generated by existing customers, referrals from real estate brokers, and automobile
dealers participating in our indirect automobile loan program, residential home builders, walk-in
business, and from our internet website.
We decide whether to retain the loans that we originate or sell loans in the secondary market
after evaluating current and projected market interest rates, our interest rate risk objectives,
our liquidity needs, and other factors. We sold $53.7 million of one- to four-family residential
real estate loans (all fixed-rate loans with terms of 15 years or longer) during the year ended
December 31, 2010, and $79.5 million of such loans were sold during the year ended December 31,
2009. We had $861,000 in loans held for sale at December 31, 2010.
At December 31, 2010, we were servicing residential real estate loans for Fannie Mae with a
principal balance of $122.5 million. Loan servicing includes collecting and remitting loan
payments, accounting for principal and interest, contacting delinquent borrowers, supervising
foreclosures and property dispositions in the event of unremediated defaults, making certain
insurance and tax payments on behalf of borrowers, and generally administering the loans. We
retain a portion of the interest paid by the borrower on the loans we service as consideration for
our servicing activities.
We purchased $4.5 million and $21.5 million in loans during the years ended December 31, 2010
and 2009, respectively. We purchased commercial loans and one- to four-family residential real
estate loans in 2010 and 2009 to supplement our own loan origination activity.
14
The following table shows our loan origination, sale, and repayment activities for the years
indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Year Ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Originations by type: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustable-rate: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential real estate loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One- to four-family |
|
$ |
6,676 |
|
|
$ |
8,881 |
|
|
$ |
18,761 |
|
Home equity |
|
|
3,739 |
|
|
|
2,038 |
|
|
|
2,207 |
|
Commercial loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial real estate |
|
|
5,976 |
|
|
|
3,246 |
|
|
|
9,584 |
|
Real estate construction |
|
|
9,886 |
|
|
|
6,285 |
|
|
|
16,819 |
|
Commercial business |
|
|
6,814 |
|
|
|
19,581 |
|
|
|
6,148 |
|
Consumer loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Automobile, indirect |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Automobile, direct |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unsecured |
|
|
80 |
|
|
|
611 |
|
|
|
610 |
|
Other |
|
|
3,016 |
|
|
|
2,880 |
|
|
|
1,919 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total adjustable-rate |
|
|
36,187 |
|
|
|
43,522 |
|
|
|
56,048 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed-rate: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential real estate loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One- to four-family |
|
|
119,344 |
|
|
|
137,873 |
|
|
|
108,441 |
|
Home equity |
|
|
2,078 |
|
|
|
4,534 |
|
|
|
8,422 |
|
Commercial loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial real estate |
|
|
1,168 |
|
|
|
7,628 |
|
|
|
8,362 |
|
Real estate construction |
|
|
1,502 |
|
|
|
1,207 |
|
|
|
415 |
|
Commercial business |
|
|
2,049 |
|
|
|
11,481 |
|
|
|
8,042 |
|
Consumer loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Automobile, indirect |
|
|
58,333 |
|
|
|
62,285 |
|
|
|
79,029 |
|
Automobile, direct |
|
|
10,912 |
|
|
|
10,283 |
|
|
|
16,223 |
|
Unsecured |
|
|
3,409 |
|
|
|
3,574 |
|
|
|
3,427 |
|
Other |
|
|
813 |
|
|
|
529 |
|
|
|
523 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total fixed-rate |
|
|
199,608 |
|
|
|
239,394 |
|
|
|
232,884 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans originated |
|
$ |
235,795 |
|
|
$ |
282,916 |
|
|
$ |
288,932 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential real estate loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One- to four-family |
|
$ |
130 |
|
|
$ |
14,722 |
|
|
$ |
33,372 |
|
Home equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial real estate |
|
|
3,400 |
|
|
|
4,794 |
|
|
|
4,200 |
|
Real estate construction |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,000 |
|
Commercial business |
|
|
978 |
|
|
|
1,944 |
|
|
|
38,472 |
|
Consumer loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Automobile, indirect |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Automobile, direct |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unsecured and other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans purchased |
|
$ |
4,508 |
|
|
$ |
21,460 |
|
|
$ |
78,044 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales and repayments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential real estate loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One- to four-family |
|
$ |
53,660 |
|
|
$ |
79,456 |
|
|
$ |
71,659 |
|
Home equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial real estate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate construction |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial business |
|
|
3,211 |
|
|
|
4,517 |
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Automobile, indirect |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Automobile, direct |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unsecured and other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans sold |
|
$ |
56,871 |
|
|
$ |
83,973 |
|
|
$ |
71,659 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal repayments |
|
$ |
221,679 |
|
|
$ |
235,742 |
|
|
$ |
283,219 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total reductions |
|
$ |
278,550 |
|
|
$ |
319,715 |
|
|
$ |
354,878 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase (decrease) in other items, net |
|
$ |
545 |
|
|
$ |
(2,308 |
) |
|
$ |
(3,423 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (decrease) increase |
|
$ |
(37,702 |
) |
|
$ |
(17,647 |
) |
|
$ |
8,675 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15
Loan Approval Procedures and Authority. Our lending activities follow written,
non-discriminatory underwriting standards and loan origination procedures established by our board
of directors. The loan approval process is intended to assess the borrowers ability to repay the
loan and the value of the collateral that will secure the loan. To assess the borrowers ability
to repay, we review the borrowers employment and credit history and information on the historical
and projected income and expenses of the borrower. We will also evaluate a guarantor when a
guarantee is provided as part of the loan.
OmniAmerican Banks policies and loan approval limits are established by our board of
directors. Our junior lending officers may approve secured commercial loans up to $50,000 and
unsecured commercial loans up to $5,000. Similarly, such officers may approve secured consumer
loans up to $50,000 and unsecured consumer loans up to $5,000. Our lending officers at the vice
president level may approve secured commercial loans up to $75,000 and unsecured commercial loans
up to $5,000. Similarly, such officers may approve secured consumer loans up to $50,000 and
unsecured consumer loans up to $5,000. Aggregate lending relationships in amounts up to $1.0
million for residential real estate loans and in amounts up to $1.0 million for commercial real
estate loans may be approved by the Chief Lending Officer or the Chief Credit Officer. Our
President and Chief Executive Officer has authority to approve aggregate lending relationships in
amounts up to $2.0 million for residential real estate loans and in amounts up to $2.5 million for
commercial real estate loans. All loans in excess of $1.0 million must be approved or ratified by
a majority of the Loan Committee, consisting of our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Lending Officer,
Chief Financial Officer, Chief Operating Officer and Chief Credit Officer. All approved loans in
excess of $1.0 million are reported to the board of directors upon approval.
We generally require appraisals by independent, licensed, third-party appraisers of all real
property securing loans. All appraisers are approved by the board of directors annually.
Non-performing Assets, Problem Assets, and Potential Problem Loans
With respect to our residential real estate loans and consumer loans, collection calls
typically begin between the 5th and 15th day of delinquency. By the time a
loan is 30 days past due, there will have been three delinquency notices sent as well as a minimum
of three personal phone contact attempts from the assigned employee and/or an automated calling
system. During each personal phone contact, the borrower is required to provide updated
information and is counseled on the terms of the loan and the importance of making payments on or
before the due date. Typically repossessions occur between 30 and 45 days, while foreclosures
typically begin after the 61st day of delinquency. A summary report of all loans 30
days or more past due is provided monthly to our board of directors.
With respect to our commercial real estate and commercial business lending, collection efforts
are carried out directly by our commercial loan officers. Commercial loan officers review past due
accounts weekly and contact delinquent borrowers immediately. Past due notices are typically sent
to commercial real estate customers and commercial business customers at 15 days past due.
Loans are automatically placed on non-accrual status when the payment of principal and/or
interest is 90 days or more past due. Loans may also be placed on non-accrual status if collection
of principal or interest is in doubt or if the collateral is in jeopardy. When loans are placed on
non-accrual status, unpaid accrued interest is fully reversed, and further income is recognized
only to the extent received. The loan may be returned to accrual status if unpaid principal and
interest are repaid so that the loan is less than 90 days delinquent.
The Bank may from time to time agree to modify the contractual terms of a borrowers loan. In
cases where such modifications represent a concession to a borrower experiencing financial
difficulty, the
modification is considered a troubled debt restructuring. At December 31, 2010, 2009, 2008,
2007 and 2006, we had troubled debt restructurings of $19.5 million, $18.4 million, $4.0 million,
$2.1 million and $2.3, respectively.
16
Non-Performing Assets. The table below sets forth the amounts and categories of our
non-performing assets at the dates indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Non-accrual loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential real estate loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One- to four-family |
|
$ |
2,294 |
|
|
$ |
1,640 |
|
|
$ |
81 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Home equity |
|
|
230 |
|
|
|
94 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial real estate |
|
|
5,587 |
|
|
|
6,304 |
|
|
|
5,272 |
|
|
|
2,668 |
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate construction |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial business |
|
|
1,051 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
107 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Automobile, indirect |
|
|
78 |
|
|
|
200 |
|
|
|
240 |
|
|
|
243 |
|
|
|
280 |
|
Automobile, direct |
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
57 |
|
|
|
81 |
|
Unsecured |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-accrual loans |
|
|
9,251 |
|
|
|
8,273 |
|
|
|
5,701 |
|
|
|
2,972 |
|
|
|
361 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans delinquent 90 days or greater and
still accruing: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential real estate loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One- to four-family |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Home equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial real estate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,938 |
|
Real estate construction |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial business |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Automobile, indirect |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Automobile, direct |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unsecured |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans delinquent 90 days
or greater and still accruing |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,938 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-performing loans |
|
|
9,251 |
|
|
|
8,273 |
|
|
|
5,701 |
|
|
|
2,972 |
|
|
|
3,299 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other real estate owned and foreclosed
assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential real estate loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One- to four-family |
|
$ |
2,316 |
|
|
$ |
671 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Home equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial real estate |
|
|
12,477 |
|
|
|
6,091 |
|
|
|
488 |
|
|
|
488 |
|
|
|
488 |
|
Real estate construction |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial business |
|
|
|
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Automobile, indirect |
|
|
165 |
|
|
|
218 |
|
|
|
95 |
|
|
|
228 |
|
|
|
125 |
|
Automobile, direct |
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
Unsecured |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other real estate owned
and foreclosed assets |
|
|
15,000 |
|
|
|
7,029 |
|
|
|
586 |
|
|
|
736 |
|
|
|
631 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-performing assets |
|
$ |
24,251 |
|
|
$ |
15,302 |
|
|
$ |
6,287 |
|
|
$ |
3,708 |
|
|
$ |
3,930 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ratios: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-performing loans to total loans |
|
|
1.38 |
% |
|
|
1.17 |
% |
|
|
0.79 |
% |
|
|
0.42 |
% |
|
|
0.45 |
% |
Non-performing assets to total assets |
|
|
2.19 |
|
|
|
1.35 |
|
|
|
0.59 |
|
|
|
0.35 |
|
|
|
0.37 |
|
17
Interest income recognized on non-accruing loans and troubled debt restructured loans was
$763,000 for the year ended December 31, 2010. Had non-accrual and troubled debt restructured
loans been current in accordance with their original terms, an additional $555,000 in interest
income would have been recognized in 2010 on these loans.
At December 31, 2010, our non-accrual loans totaled $9.3 million. The non-accrual loans
consisted primarily of two loans with principal balances totaling $5.3 million. The first loan,
with an outstanding balance of $3.9 million at December 31, 2010, is a participation purchased in a
$37 million credit secured by a hotel with an appraised value of $65.5 million as of the most
recent appraisal obtained in July 2010. At December 31, 2010, we did not have a specific allowance
on this loan. The second loan, with an outstanding balance of $1.4 million at December 31, 2010,
is secured by residential lots with an appraised value less estimated selling costs of $1.6 million
based on an appraisal performed in March 2010. At December 31, 2010, we did not have a specific
allowance on this loan.
At December 31, 2010, we had no loans that were not currently classified as non-accrual, 90
days past due or troubled debt restructurings, but where known information about possible credit
problems of borrowers caused management to have serious concerns as to the ability of the borrowers
to comply with present loan repayment terms and that may result in disclosure as non-accrual, 90
days past due, or troubled debt restructurings.
Delinquent Loans. The following table sets forth certain information with respect to our loan
portfolio delinquencies at the dates indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans Delinquent For |
|
|
|
|
|
|
60-89 Days |
|
|
90 Days and Over |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
Number |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Number |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Number |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential real estate loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One- to four-family |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
$ |
2,294 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
$ |
2,294 |
|
Home equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
230 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
230 |
|
Commercial loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial real estate |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
149 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
1,568 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
1,717 |
|
Real estate construction |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial business |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
359 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
359 |
|
Consumer loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Automobile, indirect |
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
204 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
78 |
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
282 |
|
Automobile, direct |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
Unsecured |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
40 |
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans |
|
|
23 |
|
|
$ |
761 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
$ |
4,181 |
|
|
|
44 |
|
|
$ |
4,942 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential real estate loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One- to four-family |
|
|
1 |
|
|
$ |
53 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
$ |
1,640 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
$ |
1,693 |
|
Home equity |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
73 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
94 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
167 |
|
Commercial loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial real estate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
103 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
103 |
|
Real estate construction |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial business |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Automobile, indirect |
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
245 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
195 |
|
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
440 |
|
Automobile, direct |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
36 |
|
Unsecured |
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
61 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
61 |
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans |
|
|
49 |
|
|
$ |
438 |
|
|
|
29 |
|
|
$ |
2,071 |
|
|
|
78 |
|
|
$ |
2,509 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans Delinquent For |
|
|
|
|
|
|
60-89 Days |
|
|
90 Days and Over |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
Number |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Number |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Number |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential real estate loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One- to four-family |
|
|
1 |
|
|
$ |
101 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
$ |
81 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
$ |
182 |
|
Home equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial real estate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
5,272 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
5,272 |
|
Real estate construction |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial business |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
91 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
110 |
|
Consumer loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Automobile, indirect |
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
457 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
240 |
|
|
|
63 |
|
|
|
697 |
|
Automobile, direct |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
30 |
|
Unsecured |
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
74 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
74 |
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans |
|
|
61 |
|
|
$ |
680 |
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
$ |
5,685 |
|
|
|
87 |
|
|
$ |
6,365 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential real estate loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One- to four-family |
|
|
1 |
|
|
$ |
164 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
$ |
164 |
|
Home equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial real estate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate construction |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial business |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
Consumer loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Automobile, indirect |
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
347 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
243 |
|
|
|
55 |
|
|
|
590 |
|
Automobile, direct |
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
74 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
57 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
131 |
|
Unsecured |
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
23 |
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans |
|
|
61 |
|
|
$ |
630 |
|
|
|
29 |
|
|
$ |
304 |
|
|
|
90 |
|
|
$ |
934 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential real estate loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One- to four-family |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Home equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial real estate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
2,938 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
2,938 |
|
Real estate construction |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial business |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Automobile, indirect |
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
357 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
280 |
|
|
|
46 |
|
|
|
637 |
|
Automobile, direct |
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
102 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
81 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
183 |
|
Unsecured |
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
37 |
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans |
|
|
64 |
|
|
$ |
496 |
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
$ |
3,299 |
|
|
|
88 |
|
|
$ |
3,795 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total delinquent loans increased by $2.4 million to $4.9 million at December 31, 2010
from $2.5 million at December 31, 2009. The increase in delinquent loans was primarily
attributable to a $1.5 million increase in commercial real estate loans delinquent 90 days and
over and a $654,000 increase in one-to four-family residential real estate loans delinquent 90
days and over.
Real Estate Owned and Foreclosed Assets. Real estate acquired by us as a result of
foreclosure or by deed in lieu of foreclosure is classified as real estate owned. When property
is acquired, it is recorded at the lower of cost or estimated fair market value at the date of
foreclosure, establishing a new cost basis. Estimated fair value generally represents the sale
price a buyer would be willing to pay on the basis of current market conditions, including normal
terms from other financial institutions, less the estimated costs to sell the property. Holding
costs and declines in estimated fair market value result in charges to noninterest expense after
acquisition. In addition, we periodically repossess certain collateral,
including automobiles and other titled vehicles. At December 31, 2010, we had $15.0 million
in real estate owned and foreclosed assets, of which $276,000 constituted property we originally
acquired for a future branch site.
19
Classification of Assets. Our policies, consistent with regulatory guidelines, provide for
the classification of loans and other assets that are considered to be of lesser quality as
substandard, doubtful, or loss assets. An asset is considered substandard if it is inadequately
protected by the current net worth and paying capacity of the obligor or of the collateral pledged,
if any. Substandard assets include those assets characterized by the distinct possibility that we
will sustain some loss if the deficiencies are not corrected. Assets classified as doubtful have
all of the weaknesses inherent in those classified substandard with the added characteristic that
the weaknesses present make collection or liquidation in full, on the basis of currently existing
facts, conditions and values, highly questionable and improbable. Assets (or portions of assets)
classified as loss are those considered uncollectible and of such little value that their
continuance as assets is not warranted. Assets that do not expose us to risk sufficient to warrant
classification in one of the aforementioned categories, but which possess potential weaknesses that
deserve our close attention, are required to be designated as special mention. As of December 31,
2010, we had $9.3 million of assets designated as special mention.
When we classify assets as either substandard or doubtful, we allocate a portion of the
related general loss allowances to such assets as we deem prudent. The allowance for loan losses
is the amount estimated by management as necessary to absorb credit losses incurred in the loan
portfolio that are both probable and reasonably estimable at the balance sheet date. When we
classify a problem asset as loss, we provide a specific reserve for that portion of the asset that
is uncollectible. Our determination as to the classification of our assets and the amount of our
loss allowances are subject to review by our principal federal regulator, the Office of Thrift
Supervision, which can require that we establish additional loss allowances. We regularly review
our asset portfolio to determine whether any assets require classification in accordance with
applicable regulations. Based on our review of our assets at December 31, 2010, we had substandard
assets of $68.8 million, consisting of $44.0 million of substandard loans, $15.0 million of real
estate owned and foreclosed assets and $9.8 million of substandard investment securities. There
were no doubtful assets and no loss assets at December 31, 2010.
As of December 31, 2010, our largest substandard asset was a loan with a balance of $9.6
million secured by multi-family condominium units. At December 31, 2010, the loan was identified
as impaired and a specific valuation allowance of $611,000 had been established related to the
loan.
Allowance for Loan Losses
The allowance for loan losses is maintained at a level that, in managements judgment, is
adequate to cover probable credit losses inherent in the loan portfolio at the balance sheet date.
The allowance for loan losses is established as losses are estimated to have occurred through a
provision for loan losses charged to earnings. Loan losses are charged against the allowance when
management believes the uncollectability of a loan balance is confirmed. Subsequent recoveries, if
any, are credited to the allowance.
The allowance for loan losses is evaluated on a regular basis by management and is based upon
managements periodic review of the collectability of the loans in light of various factors,
including but not limited to current economic conditions, historical experience, the nature and
volume of the loan portfolio, the financial strength of the borrower and the estimated value of any
underlying collateral. This evaluation is inherently subjective as it requires estimates that are
susceptible to significant revision as more information becomes available.
20
Our evaluation of the risks inherent in our loan portfolio and changes in our asset quality
considers various factors pertinent to a determination of the adequacy of the allowance for loan
losses. In particular, the following factors are considered in the evaluation of the allowance for
loan losses:
|
|
|
changes in portfolio composition, loan balances, and the maturities of various loan
types in the portfolio; |
|
|
|
changes in loan concentrations, borrower economic profiles, industries, location of
borrowers and loan collateral, particular loan products, loan classes and collateral
types; |
|
|
|
changes in the volume and trend of loan delinquencies and loans in non-accrual
status; |
|
|
|
the level of criticized and classified loans, as well as delinquency trends in the
loan portfolio and developments in significant individual loans identified as problem
loans; |
|
|
|
non-performing loans and non-performing assets, including trends in the aggregate
and developments in significant individual loan credits; |
|
|
|
historical trends of actual loan losses or charge-offs (net of recoveries) based on
volume and types of loans; |
|
|
|
specific issues brought to the attention of management citing weaknesses or
deficiencies in systems and procedures or any violations of our policies which may lead
to or create any undue risk to us; and |
|
|
|
significant recoveries or additions to the allowance for loan losses. |
Our methodology for evaluating the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses consists of:
|
|
|
a specific loss component which is the allowance for impaired loans as required by
Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) 310-10, Receivables, and |
|
|
|
a general loss component for all other loans not individually evaluated for
impairment but that, on a portfolio basis, are believed to have some inherent but
unidentified loss in accordance with ASC 450-10, Contingencies. |
The specific component of the allowance for loan losses relates to loans that are classified
as doubtful, substandard or special mention. For such loans that are also classified as impaired,
an allowance is established when the discounted cash flows (or collateral value or observable
market price) of the impaired loan is lower than the carrying value of that loan. A loan is
considered impaired when, based on current information and events, it is probable that we will be
unable to collect the scheduled payments of principal or interest when due according to the
contractual terms of the loan agreement. Factors considered by management in determining
impairment include payment status, collateral value and the probability of collecting scheduled
principal and interest payments when due. Loans that experience insignificant payment delays and
payment shortfalls generally are not classified as impaired. Management determines the
significance of payment delays and payment shortfalls on a case-by-case basis, taking into
consideration all of the circumstances surrounding the loan and the borrower, and the amount of the
shortfall in relation to the principal and interest owed. Impairment is measured on a loan-by-loan
basis for non-homogenous loans, including one- to four-family residential real estate loans with
balances in excess of $1.0 million, commercial real estate, real estate construction, and
commercial business loans by either the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at
the loans effective interest rate, the loans obtainable market price or the fair value of the
collateral if the loan is collateral
dependent. Large groups of smaller balance homogeneous loans are collectively evaluated for
impairment. Accordingly, we do not separately identify consumer and one- to four-family
residential real estate loans with balances less than $1.0 million for impairment disclosures,
unless such loans are the subject of a restructuring agreement.
21
The general component of the allowance for loan losses covers non-classified loans and is
based on the historical loss experience adjusted for other qualitative factors. The loan portfolio
is stratified into homogeneous groups of loans that possess similar loss potential characteristics
and an appropriate loss ratio adjusted for other qualitative factors is applied to the homogeneous
pools of loans to estimate the incurred losses in the loan portfolio. The other qualitative
factors considered by management include, but are not limited to, the following:
|
|
|
changes in lending policies and procedures, including underwriting standards and
collection, charge-off, and recovery practices; |
|
|
|
changes in national and local economic and business conditions and developments,
including the condition of various market segments; |
|
|
|
changes in the nature and volume of the loan portfolio; |
|
|
|
changes in the experience, ability and depth of knowledge of the management of the
lending staff; |
|
|
|
changes in the trend of the volume and severity of past due and classified loans;
and trends in the volume of non-accrual loans, troubled debt restructurings, and other
loan modifications; |
|
|
|
changes in the quality of our loan review system and the degree of oversight by the
board of directors; |
|
|
|
the existence and effect of any concentrations of credit, and changes in the level
of such concentrations; and |
|
|
|
the effect of external factors such as competition and legal and regulatory
requirements on the level of estimated credit losses in our current portfolio. |
Commercial real estate loans generally have greater credit risks compared to one- to
four-family residential real estate loans, as they typically involve larger loan balances
concentrated with single borrowers or groups of related borrowers. In addition, the payment
experience on loans secured by income-producing properties typically depends on the successful
operation of the related real estate project and thus may be subject to a greater extent to adverse
conditions in the real estate market and in the general economy.
Commercial business loans involve a greater risk of default than residential real estate loans
of like duration since their repayment generally depends on the successful operation of the
borrowers business and the sufficiency of collateral, if any. Loans secured by multi-family
residential real estate generally involve a greater degree of credit risk than one- to four-family
residential real estate loans and carry larger loan balances. This increased credit risk is a
result of several factors, including the concentration of principal in a limited number of loans
and borrowers, the effects of general economic conditions on income producing properties, and the
increased difficulty of evaluating and monitoring these types of loans. Furthermore, the repayment
of loans secured by multi-family mortgages typically depends upon the successful operation of the
related real estate property. If the cash flow from the project is reduced, the borrowers ability
to repay the loan may be impaired.
22
Real estate construction loans generally have greater credit risk than traditional one- to
four-family residential real estate loans. The repayment of these loans depends upon the sale of
the property to third parties or the availability of permanent financing upon completion of all
improvements. In the event we make a loan on property that is not yet approved for the planned
development, there is the risk that approvals will not be granted or will be delayed. These events
may adversely affect the borrower and the collateral value of the property. Real estate
construction loans also expose us to the risk that improvements will not be completed on time in
accordance with specifications and projected costs. In addition, the ultimate sale or rental of
the property may not occur as anticipated.
The increase in substandard, non-performing and impaired loans has affected the level of the
allowance for loan losses at December 31, 2010. The allowance for loan losses increased $604,000,
or 7.3%, to $8.9 million at December 31, 2010 from $8.3 million at December 31, 2009, while total
loans decreased $38.3 million, or 5.4%, to $669.5 million from $707.8 million during the same time
period. At December 31, 2010, the allowance for loan losses represented 1.33% of total loans
compared to 1.18% of total loans at December 31, 2009. Substandard loans increased $3.7 million,
or 9.2%, to $44.0 million at December 31, 2010 from $40.3 million at December 31, 2009.
Non-performing loans increased to $9.3 million at December 31, 2010 from $8.3 million at
December 31, 2009, due primarily to the addition of six non-performing one- to four-family
residential real estate loans with balances totaling $2.2 million, three non-performing commercial
real estate loans with balances totaling $1.7 million and five non-performing commercial business
loans with balances totaling $1.1 million, partially offset by decreases due the foreclosure of
seven non-performing one- to four-family residential real estate loans with balances totaling $1.4
million at December 31, 2009 and one non-performing commercial real estate loan with a balance of
$2.2 million at December 31, 2009. Approximately 87.7% and 97.2% of our non-performing loans were
collateralized by real estate at December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. Non-performing loans
are evaluated to determine impairment. Loans that are found to be impaired are individually
assessed and a specific valuation allowance is applied, if warranted.
As of December 31, 2010, we identified 167 impaired loans with balances totaling $33.3
million, of which four of the larger balance loans had principal balances totaling $19.6 million.
The largest of the impaired loans with a balance of $9.6 million at December 31, 2010, was secured
by multi-family condominium units with an estimated discounted cash flow of $9.0 million. At
December 31, 2010, a specific allowance in the amount of $611,000 had been established for this
loan. The second largest impaired loan with a balance of $3.9 million at December 31, 2010 is a
participation purchased in a $37.0 million credit secured by a hotel with an appraised value of
$65.5 million as of the most recent appraisal obtained in July 2010. At December 31, 2010, we did
not have a specific allowance on this loan since the appraised value less selling costs of the
property exceeded the loan balance. The third largest balance impaired loan had principal balance
of $3.3 million at December 31, 2010 and was secured by a single-family residence with a discounted
collateral value of $3.2 million based upon an appraisal obtained October 2009. A specific
allowance in the amount of $131,000 was established for this loan, which equaled the difference
between the discounted collateral value and the principal balance of the loan. The fourth largest
balance impaired loan at December 31, 2010 had an outstanding balance of $2.8 million and was
secured by residential lots with a collateral value of $3.0 million based upon an appraisal
obtained March 2010.
Appraisals are performed by independent, certified appraisers to obtain fair values on
non-homogenous loans secured by real estate. The appraisals are generally obtained when market
conditions change, annually for criticized loans, and at the time a loan becomes impaired.
23
We periodically evaluate the carrying value of loans and the allowance is adjusted
accordingly. While we use the best information available to make evaluations, future adjustments
to the allowance may be necessary if conditions differ substantially from the information used in
making the evaluations. In addition, as an integral part of their examination process, the Office
of Thrift Supervision periodically reviews the allowance for loan losses. The Office of Thrift
Supervision may require us to recognize additions to the allowance based on their analysis of
information available to them at the time of their examination. With the imminent sunset of the
Office of Thrift Supervision, our new federal banking regulator is expected to be the Office of the
Comptroller of the Currency. At this time, we cannot determine what, if any, changes our new
federal regulator may require in the assessment of the allowance for loan losses.
The following table sets forth activity in our allowance for loan losses for the years
indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At or For the Years Ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of year |
|
$ |
8,328 |
|
|
$ |
8,270 |
|
|
$ |
7,386 |
|
|
$ |
7,049 |
|
|
$ |
4,792 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Charge-offs: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential real estate loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One- to four-family |
|
|
325 |
|
|
|
183 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Home equity |
|
|
61 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial real estate |
|
|
3,635 |
|
|
|
899 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
51 |
|
|
|
27 |
|
Real estate construction |
|
|
|
|
|
|
556 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
|
Commercial business |
|
|
259 |
|
|
|
665 |
|
|
|
345 |
|
|
|
946 |
|
|
|
53 |
|
Consumer loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Automobile, indirect |
|
|
1,357 |
|
|
|
2,187 |
|
|
|
1,890 |
|
|
|
2,026 |
|
|
|
2,875 |
|
Automobile, direct |
|
|
86 |
|
|
|
137 |
|
|
|
120 |
|
|
|
45 |
|
|
|
576 |
|
Unsecured |
|
|
614 |
|
|
|
975 |
|
|
|
1,139 |
|
|
|
1,242 |
|
|
|
877 |
|
Other |
|
|
129 |
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
130 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total charge-offs |
|
|
6,466 |
|
|
|
5,632 |
|
|
|
3,520 |
|
|
|
4,329 |
|
|
|
4,548 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recoveries: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential real estate loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One- to four-family |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21 |
|
Home equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial real estate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
Real estate construction |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial business |
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
228 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
Consumer loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Automobile, indirect |
|
|
139 |
|
|
|
335 |
|
|
|
296 |
|
|
|
505 |
|
|
|
466 |
|
Automobile, direct |
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
52 |
|
|
|
184 |
|
Unsecured |
|
|
173 |
|
|
|
144 |
|
|
|
256 |
|
|
|
230 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
Other |
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total recoveries |
|
|
370 |
|
|
|
490 |
|
|
|
579 |
|
|
|
1,016 |
|
|
|
692 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net charge-offs |
|
|
6,096 |
|
|
|
5,142 |
|
|
|
2,941 |
|
|
|
3,313 |
|
|
|
3,856 |
|
Portfolio sales |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
6,700 |
|
|
|
5,200 |
|
|
|
3,825 |
|
|
|
3,650 |
|
|
|
6,113 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of year |
|
$ |
8,932 |
|
|
$ |
8,328 |
|
|
$ |
8,270 |
|
|
$ |
7,386 |
|
|
$ |
7,049 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ratios: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net charge-offs to average
loans outstanding |
|
|
0.89 |
% |
|
|
0.71 |
% |
|
|
0.40 |
% |
|
|
0.46 |
% |
|
|
0.52 |
% |
Allowance for loan losses to
non-performing loans at end
of year |
|
|
96.55 |
|
|
|
100.66 |
|
|
|
145.06 |
|
|
|
248.52 |
|
|
|
213.67 |
|
Allowance for loan losses to
total loans at end of year |
|
|
1.33 |
|
|
|
1.18 |
|
|
|
1.14 |
|
|
|
1.04 |
|
|
|
0.96 |
|
24
Allocation of Allowance for Loan Losses. The following table sets forth the allowance
for loan losses allocated by loan category and the percent of loans in each category to total loans
at the dates indicated. The allowance for loan losses allocated to each category is not
necessarily indicative of future losses in any particular category and does not restrict the use of
the allowance to absorb losses in other categories.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans in Each |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans in Each |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans in Each |
|
|
|
Allowance for |
|
|
Category to |
|
|
Allowance for |
|
|
Category to |
|
|
Allowance for |
|
|
Category to |
|
|
|
Loan Losses |
|
|
Total Loans |
|
|
Loan Losses |
|
|
Total Loans |
|
|
Loan Losses |
|
|
Total Loans |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential real estate loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One- to four-family |
|
$ |
1,207 |
|
|
|
40.60 |
% |
|
$ |
1,341 |
|
|
|
36.35 |
% |
|
$ |
936 |
|
|
|
33.96 |
% |
Home equity |
|
|
158 |
|
|
|
3.98 |
|
|
|
136 |
|
|
|
4.03 |
|
|
|
156 |
|
|
|
3.76 |
|
Commercial loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial real estate |
|
|
1,479 |
|
|
|
13.13 |
|
|
|
2,068 |
|
|
|
14.27 |
|
|
|
2,660 |
|
|
|
12.31 |
|
Real estate construction |
|
|
979 |
|
|
|
5.15 |
|
|
|
1,077 |
|
|
|
5.20 |
|
|
|
1,204 |
|
|
|
6.34 |
|
Commercial business |
|
|
2,443 |
|
|
|
7.28 |
|
|
|
855 |
|
|
|
8.38 |
|
|
|
744 |
|
|
|
7.05 |
|
Consumer loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Automobile, indirect |
|
|
1,983 |
|
|
|
23.41 |
|
|
|
2,156 |
|
|
|
24.98 |
|
|
|
1,927 |
|
|
|
28.95 |
|
Automobile, direct |
|
|
310 |
|
|
|
3.66 |
|
|
|
350 |
|
|
|
4.06 |
|
|
|
320 |
|
|
|
4.82 |
|
Unsecured |
|
|
306 |
|
|
|
2.00 |
|
|
|
284 |
|
|
|
2.02 |
|
|
|
270 |
|
|
|
2.00 |
|
Other |
|
|
67 |
|
|
|
0.79 |
|
|
|
61 |
|
|
|
0.71 |
|
|
|
53 |
|
|
|
0.81 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
8,932 |
|
|
|
100.00 |
% |
|
|
8,328 |
|
|
|
100.00 |
% |
|
$ |
8,270 |
|
|
|
100.00 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans in Each |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans in Each |
|
|
|
Allowance for |
|
|
Category to |
|
|
Allowance for |
|
|
Category to |
|
|
|
Loan Losses |
|
|
Total Loans |
|
|
Loan Losses |
|
|
Total Loans |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential real estate loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One- to four-family |
|
$ |
641 |
|
|
|
29.60 |
% |
|
$ |
500 |
|
|
|
22.52 |
% |
Home equity |
|
|
63 |
|
|
|
2.98 |
|
|
|
58 |
|
|
|
2.63 |
|
Commercial loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial real estate |
|
|
3,455 |
|
|
|
11.53 |
|
|
|
725 |
|
|
|
10.16 |
|
Real estate construction |
|
|
301 |
|
|
|
6.05 |
|
|
|
282 |
|
|
|
3.95 |
|
Commercial business |
|
|
335 |
|
|
|
4.91 |
|
|
|
1,440 |
|
|
|
1.59 |
|
Consumer loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Automobile, indirect |
|
|
1,966 |
|
|
|
36.39 |
|
|
|
2,867 |
|
|
|
49.19 |
|
Automobile, direct |
|
|
111 |
|
|
|
5.30 |
|
|
|
552 |
|
|
|
6.19 |
|
Unsecured |
|
|
493 |
|
|
|
2.25 |
|
|
|
481 |
|
|
|
2.38 |
|
Other |
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
0.99 |
|
|
|
144 |
|
|
|
1.39 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
7,386 |
|
|
|
100.00 |
% |
|
$ |
7,049 |
|
|
|
100.00 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The allowance for loan losses increased $604,000, or 7.3%, to $8.9 million at December
31, 2010 from $8.3 million at December 31, 2009, while total loans decreased $38.3 million, or
5.4%, to $669.5 million at December 31, 2010 from $707.8 million at December 31, 2009. The
increase in the allowance for loan losses attributable to commercial business loans was partially
offset by a decrease in the allowance for loan losses related to commercial real estate loans. At
December 31, 2010, the allowance for loan losses represented 1.33% of total loans compared to 1.18%
of total loans at December 31, 2009. Included in the allowance for loan losses at December 31,
2010 were specific allowances for loan losses of $2.3 million related to eight impaired loans with
balances totaling $15.6 million. Impaired loans with balances totaling $17.7 million did not
require specific allowances for loan losses at December 31, 2010. The allowance for loan losses at
December 31, 2009 included specific allowance for loan losses of $687,000 related to five impaired
loans with balances totaling $6.6 million. In addition, impaired loans with balances totaling
$11.8 million did not require specific allowances for loan losses at December 31,
2009. The balance of unimpaired loans decreased $53.2 million, or 7.7%, to $636.2 million at
December 31, 2010 from $689.4 million at December 31, 2009. The allowance for loan losses related
to unimpaired loans decreased $1.0 million, or 13.2%, to $6.6 million at December 31, 2010 from
$7.6 million at December 31, 2009.
25
The significant changes in the amount of the allowance for loan losses during the year ended
December 31, 2010 related to: (i) a $1.6 million increase in the allowance for loan losses
attributable to commercial business loans resulting primarily from the establishment of $1.5
million of specific allowance for loan losses related to five impaired commercial business loans
with balances totaling $2.0 million; and (ii) a $589,000 decrease in the allowance for loan losses
attributable to commercial real estate loans primarily due to the foreclosure in 2010 of an
impaired loan with a specific allowance for loan losses of $377,000 at December 31, 2009 and a
$212,000 reduction in the general allowance for loan losses on unimpaired commercial real estate
loans reflecting a decrease of $13.0 million, or 14.2%, in the total outstanding balance of
unimpaired commercial real estate loans to $78.6 million at December 31, 2010 from $91.6 million at
December 31, 2009. Management also considered local economic factors and unemployment as well as
the higher risk profile of commercial business and commercial real estate loans when evaluating the
adequacy of the allowance for loan losses as it pertains to these types of loans.
Investments
Several key members of the asset/liability management committee, including our President and
Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Chief Operating Officer, Chief Lending Officer,
Chief Credit Officer, and the Senior Vice President of Finance, have primary responsibility for
establishing our investment policy and overseeing its implementation, subject to oversight by our
entire board of directors. Authority to make investments under approved guidelines is delegated to
the President and Chief Executive Officer, the Chief Financial Officer, Senior Vice President of
Finance, and in the absence of all three, two other voting members of the asset/liability
management committee. The committee meets at least quarterly. All investment transactions are
reported to the board of directors for ratification at the next regular board meeting.
The investment policy is reviewed at least annually by the full board of directors. This
policy dictates that investment decisions be made based on minimizing exposure to credit risk,
liquidity requirements, potential returns and consistency with our interest rate risk management
strategy.
Our current investment policy permits us to invest in mortgage-backed securities, including
pass-through securities, insured and guaranteed by Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac and the Government
National Mortgage Association (or Ginnie Mae) as well as collateralized mortgage obligations
(CMOs) issued or backed by securities issued by government entities or government-sponsored
enterprises and private issuers, as well as investment grade bank-qualified municipal securities
and investment grade corporate debt securities. The investment policy also permits investments in
certain trust preferred securities, certificates of deposit, securities purchased under an
agreement to resell, bankers acceptances, commercial paper and federal funds.
Our current investment policy generally does not permit without prior approval by the board of
directors, interest rate swaps, financial futures/options transactions, purchases of high-risk
mortgage securities or securities denominated in currencies other than U.S. dollars. As a federal
savings bank, OmniAmerican Bank is generally not permitted to invest in equity securities. This
general restriction will not apply to OmniAmerican Bancorp, Inc., which may acquire up to 5% of
voting securities of any company without regulatory approval. Investing in mutual funds is
permissible, if investing in the underlying securities is permissible.
26
ASC 320, Investments Debt and Equity Securities, requires that we designate a security as
held to maturity, available-for-sale, or trading, depending on our ability and intent at the time
of purchase. Securities available for sale are reported at fair value, while securities held to
maturity are reported at amortized cost. We do not maintain a trading portfolio. Establishing a
trading portfolio would require specific authorization by our board of directors.
Our available for sale securities portfolio at December 31, 2010, consisted of securities with
the following amortized cost: $150.7 million of mortgage-backed securities issued by United States
Government-sponsored enterprises; $152.7 million of CMOs (including $3.3 million of private-label
CMOs); $7.7 million of trust preferred securities; and $5.0 million of equity securities consisting
of a community reinvestment mutual fund, the CRA Qualified Investment Fund.
Mortgage-Backed Securities. We invest in mortgage-backed securities insured or guaranteed by
Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac or Ginnie Mae. Our policy allows us to purchase privately-issued
mortgage-backed securities rated AA or higher, although in practice we generally limit purchases
of such securities to those rated AAA. We invest in mortgage-backed securities to achieve
positive interest rate spreads with minimal administrative expense, and to lower our credit risk as
a result of the guarantees provided by Freddie Mac, Fannie Mae or Ginnie Mae.
Mortgage-backed securities are created by pooling mortgages and issuing a security with an
interest rate that is less than the interest rate on the underlying mortgages. Mortgage-backed
securities typically represent a participation interest in a pool of single-family or multi-family
mortgages, although we invest primarily in mortgage-backed securities backed by one- to four-family
mortgages. The issuers of such securities pool and resell the participation interests in the form
of securities to investors such as OmniAmerican Bank. Some securities pools are guaranteed as to
payment of principal and interest to investors. Mortgage-backed securities generally yield less
than the loans that underlie such securities because of the cost of payment guarantees and credit
enhancements. However, mortgage-backed securities are more liquid than individual mortgage loans
since there is an active trading market for such securities. In addition, mortgage-backed
securities may be used to collateralize our specific liabilities and obligations. Finally,
mortgage-backed securities are assigned lower risk weightings for purposes of calculating our
risk-based capital level.
Investments in mortgage-backed securities involve a risk that actual payments will be greater
or less than the prepayment rate estimated at the time of purchase, which may require adjustments
to the amortization of any premium or acceleration of any discount relating to such interests,
thereby affecting the net yield on our securities. We periodically review current prepayment
speeds to determine whether prepayment estimates require modification that could cause amortization
or accretion adjustments.
CMOs are debt securities issued by a special-purpose entity that aggregates pools of mortgages
and mortgage-backed securities and creates different classes of securities with varying maturities
and amortization schedules, as well as a residual interest, with each class possessing different
risk characteristics. The cash flows from the underlying collateral are generally divided into
tranches or classes that have descending priorities with respect to the distribution of principal
and interest cash flows, while cash flows on pass-through mortgage-backed securities are
distributed pro rata to all security holders.
The majority of mortgage-backed securities and CMOs owned by OmniAmerican Bank are guaranteed
by the U.S. Government or agencies thereof or by government sponsored enterprises. As of December
31, 2010, on an amortized cost basis, approximately 1.1% of our mortgage-backed securities and CMOs
were private label CMOs, not guaranteed by the U.S. Government or agencies thereof. While the
private label CMOs were purchased in order to earn a higher yield than would have been earned on
U.S. Government backed mortgage-backed securities and CMOs, they also possess greater risk of loss
since private label securities and CMOs are not guaranteed by the U.S. Government or agencies
thereof. All of our private label CMOs were rated in the highest available investment category at
the time of their purchase. At December 31, 2010, with the exception the private label CMOs, all
the remaining CMOs in our investment portfolio, were rated AAA by at least one of the major
investment securities rating services. As of December 31, 2010, one of our private label CMOs with
amortized costs of $2.1 million and a fair value of $2.1 million had been downgraded to CCC by
one of the major investment securities rating services and was identified as a classified asset.
27
Trust Preferred Securities. We own shares of the senior tranches of PreTSL XXVI and PreTSL
XXVIII, two pooled trust preferred securities issued primarily by holding companies of FDIC-insured
financial institutions. At December 31, 2010, these securities had an amortized cost basis of $7.7
million and a fair value of $3.9 million. Based on our analysis of these securities, which
included a cash flow analysis and a stress analysis, management has concluded that the decline in
the fair value of these trust preferred securities as of December 31, 2010 was temporary. At
December 31, 2010, the cash flow from these securities covered the interest payment obligation. As
of December 31, 2010, the investments in both tranches of trust preferred securities had been
downgraded to below investment grade by one of the major investment securities rating services and
were identified as classified assets. We continue to closely monitor these securities.
Other Equity Securities. Other equity securities consist solely of an investment in a
community reinvestment mutual fund, the CRA Qualified Investment Fund, with a cost basis of $5.0
million and a fair value of $5.1 million as of December 31, 2010. The funds investment objective
is to provide a high level of current income consistent with the preservation of capital, and
investments in our CRA assessment area that qualify under the Community Reinvestment Act of 1977.
Investment Securities Portfolio. The following table sets forth the composition of our
investment securities portfolio at the dates indicated, excluding Federal Home Loan Bank of Dallas
stock. All of such securities were classified as available for sale.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Government
sponsored
mortgage-backed
securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fannie Mae |
|
$ |
90,239 |
|
|
$ |
92,231 |
|
|
$ |
67,474 |
|
|
$ |
70,102 |
|
|
$ |
97,722 |
|
|
$ |
100,100 |
|
Freddie Mac |
|
|
59,104 |
|
|
|
60,964 |
|
|
|
60,948 |
|
|
|
63,134 |
|
|
|
79,004 |
|
|
|
81,188 |
|
Ginnie Mae |
|
|
1,335 |
|
|
|
1,419 |
|
|
|
1,668 |
|
|
|
1,731 |
|
|
|
2,099 |
|
|
|
2,107 |
|
Collateralized
mortgage obligations |
|
|
149,336 |
|
|
|
150,792 |
|
|
|
54,378 |
|
|
|
55,148 |
|
|
|
24,919 |
|
|
|
25,180 |
|
Private-label
collateralized mortgage
obligations |
|
|
3,349 |
|
|
|
3,396 |
|
|
|
5,513 |
|
|
|
5,075 |
|
|
|
8,407 |
|
|
|
7,135 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
mortgage-backed
securities |
|
|
303,363 |
|
|
|
308,802 |
|
|
|
189,981 |
|
|
|
195,190 |
|
|
|
212,151 |
|
|
|
215,710 |
|
Trust preferred securities |
|
|
7,693 |
|
|
|
3,920 |
|
|
|
7,762 |
|
|
|
5,604 |
|
|
|
7,808 |
|
|
|
6,275 |
|
Municipal obligations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,595 |
|
|
|
4,595 |
|
|
|
5,290 |
|
|
|
5,290 |
|
Other equity securities |
|
|
5,000 |
|
|
|
5,084 |
|
|
|
5,000 |
|
|
|
5,032 |
|
|
|
3,000 |
|
|
|
3,029 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
316,056 |
|
|
$ |
317,806 |
|
|
$ |
207,338 |
|
|
$ |
210,421 |
|
|
$ |
228,249 |
|
|
$ |
230,304 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28
Portfolio Maturities and Yields. The composition and maturities of the investment
securities portfolio at December 31, 2010 are summarized in the following table. Maturities are
based on the final contractual payment dates, and do not reflect the impact of prepayments or early
redemptions that may occur.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
More than One Year |
|
|
More than Five Years |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One Year or Less |
|
|
through Five Years |
|
|
through Ten Years |
|
|
More than Ten Years |
|
|
Total Securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Average |
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Average |
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Average |
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Average |
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Yield |
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Yield |
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Yield |
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Yield |
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Yield |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Government sponsored
mortgage-backed securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fannie Mae |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
% |
|
$ |
983 |
|
|
|
4.27 |
% |
|
$ |
25,960 |
|
|
|
4.82 |
% |
|
$ |
63,296 |
|
|
|
2.89 |
% |
|
$ |
90,239 |
|
|
$ |
92,231 |
|
|
|
3.46 |
% |
Freddie Mac |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
359 |
|
|
|
4.19 |
|
|
|
21,150 |
|
|
|
4.30 |
|
|
|
37,595 |
|
|
|
3.27 |
|
|
|
59,104 |
|
|
|
60,964 |
|
|
|
3.64 |
|
Ginnie Mae |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,335 |
|
|
|
4.88 |
|
|
|
1,335 |
|
|
|
1,419 |
|
|
|
4.88 |
|
Collateralized mortgage
obligations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,210 |
|
|
|
3.38 |
|
|
|
4,244 |
|
|
|
1.81 |
|
|
|
142,882 |
|
|
|
2.80 |
|
|
|
149,336 |
|
|
|
150,792 |
|
|
|
2.78 |
|
Private-label collateralized
mortgage obligations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
902 |
|
|
|
4.53 |
|
|
|
2,447 |
|
|
|
5.33 |
|
|
|
3,349 |
|
|
|
3,396 |
|
|
|
5.12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,552 |
|
|
|
3.71 |
|
|
|
52,256 |
|
|
|
4.36 |
|
|
|
247,555 |
|
|
|
2.93 |
|
|
|
303,363 |
|
|
|
308,802 |
|
|
|
3.18 |
|
Trust preferred securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,693 |
|
|
|
1.59 |
|
|
|
7,693 |
|
|
|
3,920 |
|
|
|
1.59 |
|
Other equity securities |
|
|
5,000 |
|
|
|
3.05 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,000 |
|
|
|
5,084 |
|
|
|
3.05 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
5,000 |
|
|
|
3.05 |
% |
|
$ |
3,552 |
|
|
|
3.71 |
% |
|
$ |
52,256 |
|
|
|
4.36 |
% |
|
$ |
255,248 |
|
|
|
2.89 |
% |
|
$ |
316,056 |
|
|
$ |
317,806 |
|
|
|
3.14 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29
Sources of Funds
General. Deposits traditionally have been our primary source of funds for our lending and
investment activities. We also borrow, primarily from the Federal Home Loan Bank of Dallas, to
supplement cash flow needs, to lengthen the maturities of liabilities for interest rate risk
management purposes and to manage our cost of funds. Our additional sources of funds are the
proceeds of loan sales, scheduled loan payments, maturing investments, loan prepayments,
collateralized wholesale borrowings, retained earnings and income on other earning assets.
Deposits. We generate deposits primarily from the areas in which our branch offices are
located. We rely on our competitive pricing, convenient locations and customer service to attract
and retain deposits. We offer a variety of deposit accounts with a range of interest rates and
terms. Our deposit accounts consist of savings accounts, demand accounts, money market accounts
and certificates of deposit. On a limited basis we obtain our brokered deposits through the CDARS
network. At December 31, 2010, we had $884,000 in brokered deposits.
Interest rates, maturity terms, service fees and withdrawal penalties are established on a
periodic basis. Deposit rates and terms are based primarily on current operating strategies and
market interest rates, liquidity requirements, interest rates paid by competitors and our deposit
growth goals.
At December 31, 2010, we had a total of $343.0 million in certificates of deposit, of which
$194.1 million had remaining maturities of one year or less. Based on historical experience and
our current pricing strategy, we believe we will retain a large portion of these accounts upon
maturity.
The following tables set forth the distribution of our average total deposit accounts, by
account type, for the years indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Year Ended |
|
|
For the Year Ended |
|
|
For the Year Ended |
|
|
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
Balance |
|
|
Percent |
|
|
Rate |
|
|
Balance |
|
|
Percent |
|
|
Rate |
|
|
Balance |
|
|
Percent |
|
|
Rate |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposit type: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noninterest-bearing
demand |
|
$ |
81,342 |
|
|
|
10.16 |
% |
|
|
|
% |
|
$ |
73,798 |
|
|
|
9.62 |
% |
|
|
|
% |
|
$ |
67,591 |
|
|
|
9.14 |
% |
|
|
|
% |
Interest-bearing demand |
|
|
74,069 |
|
|
|
9.25 |
|
|
|
0.36 |
|
|
|
66,250 |
|
|
|
8.64 |
|
|
|
0.41 |
|
|
|
62,176 |
|
|
|
8.41 |
|
|
|
0.59 |
|
Savings accounts |
|
|
206,873 |
|
|
|
25.83 |
|
|
|
0.50 |
|
|
|
197,394 |
|
|
|
25.73 |
|
|
|
0.68 |
|
|
|
189,523 |
|
|
|
25.62 |
|
|
|
1.12 |
|
Money market |
|
|
93,952 |
|
|
|
11.73 |
|
|
|
0.89 |
|
|
|
87,032 |
|
|
|
11.35 |
|
|
|
1.11 |
|
|
|
77,971 |
|
|
|
10.54 |
|
|
|
2.06 |
|
Certificates of deposit |
|
|
344,681 |
|
|
|
43.03 |
|
|
|
2.12 |
|
|
|
342,589 |
|
|
|
44.66 |
|
|
|
2.97 |
|
|
|
342,315 |
|
|
|
46.29 |
|
|
|
4.09 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deposits |
|
$ |
800,917 |
|
|
|
100.00 |
% |
|
|
1.31 |
% |
|
$ |
767,063 |
|
|
|
100.00 |
% |
|
|
1.84 |
% |
|
$ |
739,576 |
|
|
|
100.00 |
% |
|
|
2.69 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30
As of December 31, 2010, the aggregate amount of outstanding certificates of deposit in
amounts greater than or equal to $100,000 was approximately $137.0 million. The following table
sets forth the maturity of those certificates as of December 31, 2010.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At |
|
|
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months or less |
|
$ |
14,423 |
|
Over three months through six months |
|
|
19,284 |
|
Over six months through one year |
|
|
33,135 |
|
Over one year to three years |
|
|
56,677 |
|
Over three years |
|
|
13,443 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
136,962 |
|
|
|
|
|
Borrowings. Our borrowings consist of advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank of
Dallas, borrowings under federal funds lines, participated loans that do not qualify as having been
sold due to our obligation to repurchase such loans, and funds borrowed under repurchase
agreements. At December 31, 2010, we had access to additional Federal Home Loan Bank advances of
up to $394.9 million. The following table sets forth information concerning balances and interest
rates on our Federal Home Loan Bank advances at the dates and for the years indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At or For the Years Ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of period |
|
$ |
41,000 |
|
|
$ |
66,400 |
|
|
$ |
169,900 |
|
Average balance during period |
|
$ |
54,009 |
|
|
$ |
117,547 |
|
|
$ |
169,026 |
|
Maximum outstanding at any month end |
|
$ |
66,400 |
|
|
$ |
159,900 |
|
|
$ |
189,650 |
|
Weighted average interest rate at end of period |
|
|
3.62 |
% |
|
|
3.54 |
% |
|
|
4.20 |
% |
Average interest rate during period |
|
|
3.72 |
% |
|
|
4.05 |
% |
|
|
4.21 |
% |
The following table sets forth information concerning balances and interest rates on our
repurchase agreements and other secured borrowings at the dates and for the years indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At or For the Years Ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of period |
|
$ |
58,000 |
|
|
$ |
58,000 |
|
|
$ |
58,664 |
|
Average balance during period |
|
$ |
58,195 |
|
|
$ |
58,000 |
|
|
$ |
64,497 |
|
Maximum outstanding at any month end |
|
$ |
58,075 |
|
|
$ |
58,000 |
|
|
$ |
73,225 |
|
Weighted average interest rate at end of period |
|
|
5.00 |
% |
|
|
3.52 |
% |
|
|
3.25 |
% |
Average interest rate during period |
|
|
4.22 |
% |
|
|
3.68 |
% |
|
|
3.80 |
% |
Subsidiary Activities
OmniAmerican Bank has one inactive subsidiary, OmniAmerican, Inc.
Expense and Tax Allocation
OmniAmerican Bank has entered into an agreement with OmniAmerican Bancorp, Inc. to provide it
with certain administrative support services, whereby OmniAmerican Bank will be compensated at not
less than the fair market value of the services provided. In addition, OmniAmerican Bank and
OmniAmerican Bancorp, Inc. have entered into an agreement to establish a method for allocating and
for reimbursing the payment of their consolidated tax liability.
31
Personnel
As of December 31, 2010, we had 292 full-time employees and 28 part-time employees. Our
employees are not represented by any collective bargaining group. Management believes that we have
a good working relationship with our employees.
SUPERVISION AND REGULATION
General
OmniAmerican Bank is supervised and examined by the Office of Thrift Supervision and is
subject to examination by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. This regulation and
supervision establishes a comprehensive framework of activities in which an institution may engage
and is intended primarily for the protection of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporations deposit
insurance funds and depositors, and not for the protection of stockholders. Under this system of
federal regulation, financial institutions are periodically examined to ensure that they satisfy
applicable standards with respect to their capital adequacy, assets, management, earnings,
liquidity, and sensitivity to market interest rates. OmniAmerican Bank also is a member of and
owns stock in the Federal Home Loan Bank of Dallas, which is one of the twelve regional banks in
the Federal Home Loan Bank System. OmniAmerican Bank also is regulated to a lesser extent by the
Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, or Federal Reserve Board, which governs reserves
to be maintained against deposits and other matters. The Office of Thrift Supervision examines
OmniAmerican Bank and prepares reports for the consideration of its board of directors on any
operating deficiencies. OmniAmerican Banks relationship with its depositors and borrowers also is
regulated to a great extent by federal law and, to a much lesser extent, state law, especially in
matters concerning the ownership of deposit accounts and the form and content of OmniAmerican
Banks loan documents.
Any change in these laws or regulations, whether by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation,
the Office of Thrift Supervision, or Congress, could have a material adverse impact on OmniAmerican
Bancorp, Inc., OmniAmerican Bank and their operations.
Under the recently enacted Dodd-Frank Act, the Office of Thrift Supervisions functions
relating to federal savings associations, including rulemaking authority, will be transferred to
the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency within one year of the date of enactment of the new
legislation or by July 21, 2011, unless extended by up to six months by the Secretary of the
Treasury. The thrift charter has been preserved and a new Deputy Comptroller of the Currency will
have responsibility over supervising and examining federal savings associations and savings banks.
As a savings and loan holding company, OmniAmerican Bancorp, Inc. is required to file certain
reports with, and is subject to examination by, and otherwise must comply with the rules and
regulations of the Office of Thrift Supervision. OmniAmerican Bancorp, Inc. is also subject to the
rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission under the federal securities laws.
Moreover, under the Dodd-Frank Act, the functions of the Office of Thrift Supervision relating to
savings and loan holding companies and their subsidiaries, as well as rulemaking and supervision
authority over thrift holding companies, will be transferred to the Federal Reserve Board.
Certain of the regulatory requirements that are applicable to OmniAmerican Bank and
OmniAmerican Bancorp, Inc. are described below. This description of statutes and regulations is
not intended to be a complete description of such statutes and regulations and their effects on
OmniAmerican Bank and OmniAmerican Bancorp, Inc., and is qualified in its entirety by reference to
the actual statutes and regulations.
32
New Federal Legislation
Congress has recently enacted the Dodd-Frank Act which will significantly change the current
bank regulatory structure and affect the lending, investment, trading, and operating activities of
financial institutions and their holding companies. The Dodd-Frank Act will eliminate our current
primary federal regulator, the Office of Thrift Supervision, and will require OmniAmerican Bank to
be regulated by the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (the primary federal regulator for
national banks). The Dodd-Frank Act also authorizes the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve
System to supervise and regulate all savings and loan holding companies like OmniAmerican Bancorp,
Inc. in addition to bank holding companies which it currently regulates. The Dodd-Frank Act also
requires the Federal Reserve Board to set minimum capital levels for all depository institution
holding companies that are as stringent as those required for the insured depository subsidiaries,
and the components of Tier 1 capital would be restricted to capital instruments that are currently
considered to be Tier 1 capital for insured depository institutions. Under the Dodd-Frank Act, the
proceeds of trust preferred securities are excluded from Tier 1 capital unless such securities were
issued prior to May 19, 2010 by bank or savings and loan holding companies with less than $15
billion of assets. Bank holding companies with assets of less than $500 million are exempt from
these capital requirements. Savings and loan holding companies are subject to a five year
transition period before the holding company capital requirements will apply. The legislation also
establishes a floor for capital of insured depository institutions that cannot be lower than the
standards in effect today, and directs the federal banking regulators to implement new leverage and
capital requirements within 18 months that take into account off-balance sheet activities and other
risks, including risks relating to securitized products and derivatives.
The Dodd-Frank Act also creates a new Consumer Financial Protection Bureau with broad powers
to supervise and enforce consumer protection laws. The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau has
broad rule-making authority for a wide range of consumer protection laws that apply to all banks
and savings institutions such as OmniAmerican Bank, including the authority to prohibit unfair,
deceptive or abusive acts and practices. The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau has examination
and enforcement authority over all banks and savings institutions with more than $10 billion in
assets. Banks and savings institutions with $10 billion or less in assets will be examined by
their applicable bank regulators. The new legislation also weakens the federal preemption
available for national banks and federal savings associations, and gives state attorneys general
the ability to enforce applicable federal consumer protection laws.
The legislation also broadens the base for Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation insurance
assessments. Assessments will now be based on the average consolidated total assets less tangible
equity capital of a financial institution. The Dodd-Frank Act also permanently increases the
maximum amount of deposit insurance for banks, savings institutions and credit unions to $250,000
per depositor, retroactive to January 1, 2008, and non-interest bearing transaction accounts have
unlimited deposit insurance through December 31, 2012. The Dodd-Frank Act requires companies to
give stockholders a non-binding vote on executive compensation and change-in-control payments, and
authorizes the Securities and Exchange Commission to promulgate rules that would allow stockholders
to nominate their own candidates using a companys proxy materials. The legislation also directs
the Federal Reserve Board to promulgate rules prohibiting excessive compensation paid to bank
holding company executives, regardless of whether the company is publicly traded or not. Further,
the legislation requires that originators of securitized loans retain a percentage of the risk for
transferred loans, directs the Federal Reserve Board to regulate pricing of certain debit card
interchange fees and contains a number of reforms related to mortgage origination. Many of the
provisions of Dodd-Frank involve delayed effective dates and/or require implementing regulations.
Accordingly, it will be some time before management can assess the full impact on operations.
However, there is a significant possibility that the Dodd-Frank Act will, at a minimum, result in
an increased regulatory burden and compliance, operating and interest expense for OmniAmerican Bank
and OmniAmerican Bancorp, Inc.
33
Federal Banking Regulation
Business Activities. A federal savings bank derives its lending and investment powers from
the Home Owners Loan Act, as amended, and the regulations of the Office of Thrift Supervision.
Under these laws and regulations, OmniAmerican Bank may invest in mortgage loans secured by
residential and commercial real estate, commercial business, and consumer loans, certain types of
debt securities and certain other assets, subject to applicable limits. OmniAmerican Bank also may
establish subsidiaries that may engage in activities not otherwise permissible for OmniAmerican
Bank, including real estate investment and securities and insurance brokerage. The Dodd-Frank Act
authorizes, for the first time, the payment of interest on commercial checking accounts effective
July 1, 2011.
Capital Requirements. Office of Thrift Supervision regulations require savings banks to meet
three minimum capital standards: a 1.5% tangible capital ratio, a 4% leverage ratio (3% for savings
banks receiving the highest rating on the CAMELS rating system), and an 8% risk-based capital
ratio.
The risk-based capital standard for savings banks requires the maintenance of Tier 1 (core)
and total capital (which is defined as core capital and supplementary capital) to risk-weighted
assets of at least 4% and 8%, respectively. In determining the amount of risk-weighted assets, all
assets, including certain off-balance sheet assets, are multiplied by a risk-weight factor of 0% to
200%, assigned by the Office of Thrift Supervision, based on the risks believed inherent in the
type of asset. Core capital is defined as common stockholders equity (including retained
earnings), certain noncumulative perpetual preferred stock and related surplus and minority
interests in equity accounts of consolidated subsidiaries, less intangibles other than certain
mortgage servicing rights and credit card relationships. The components of supplementary capital
include cumulative preferred stock, long-term perpetual preferred stock, mandatory convertible
securities, subordinated debt and intermediate preferred stock, the allowance for loan and lease
losses limited to a maximum of 1.25% of risk-weighted assets and up to 45% of net unrealized gains
on available-for-sale equity securities with readily determinable fair market values. Overall, the
amount of supplementary capital included as part of total capital cannot exceed 100% of core
capital. Additionally, a savings bank that retains credit risk in connection with an asset sale
may be required to maintain additional regulatory capital because of the purchasers recourse
against the savings bank. In assessing an institutions capital adequacy, the Office of Thrift
Supervision takes into consideration not only these numeric factors but qualitative factors as
well, and has the authority to establish higher capital requirements for individual associations
where necessary.
At December 31, 2010, OmniAmerican Banks capital exceeded all applicable requirements.
Loans to One Borrower. Generally, a federal savings bank may not make a loan or extend credit
to a single or related group of borrowers in excess of 15% of unimpaired capital and surplus. An
additional amount may be loaned, equal to 10% of unimpaired capital and surplus, if the loan is
secured by readily marketable collateral, which generally does not include real estate. As of
December 31, 2010, OmniAmerican Banks largest lending relationship with a single or related group
of borrowers totaled $12.4 million, which represented 7.3% of unimpaired capital and surplus.
Therefore, OmniAmerican Bank was in compliance with the loans to one borrower limitations.
Qualified Thrift Lender Test. As a federal savings bank, OmniAmerican Bank must satisfy the
qualified thrift lender, or QTL, test. Under the QTL test, OmniAmerican Bank must maintain at
least 65% of its portfolio assets in qualified thrift investments (primarily residential real
estate loans and related investments, including mortgage-backed securities) in at least nine months
of the most recent 12-month period. Portfolio assets generally means total assets of a savings
bank, less the sum of specified liquid assets up to 20% of total assets, goodwill and other
intangible assets, and the value of property used in the conduct of the savings banks business.
34
OmniAmerican Bank also may satisfy the QTL test by qualifying as a domestic building and loan
association as defined in the Internal Revenue Code.
A savings bank that fails the qualified thrift lender test must operate under specified
restrictions set forth in the Home Owners Loan Act. The Dodd-Frank Act makes noncompliance with
the QTL test subject to agency enforcement action for a violation of law. At December 31, 2010,
OmniAmerican Bank maintained approximately 88.2% of its portfolio assets in qualified thrift
investments and, therefore, satisfied the QTL test.
Capital Distributions. Office of Thrift Supervision regulations govern capital distributions
by a federal savings bank, which include cash dividends, stock repurchases and other transactions
charged to the savings banks capital account. A savings bank must file an application for
approval of a capital distribution if:
|
|
|
the total capital distributions for the applicable calendar year exceed the sum of
the savings banks net income for that year to date plus the savings banks retained
net income for the preceding two years; |
|
|
|
the savings bank would not be at least adequately capitalized following the
distribution; |
|
|
|
the distribution would violate any applicable statute, regulation, agreement, or
Office of Thrift Supervision-imposed condition; or |
|
|
|
the savings bank is not eligible for expedited treatment of its filings. |
Even if an application is not otherwise required, every savings bank that is a subsidiary of a
holding company must still file a notice with the Office of Thrift Supervision at least 30 days
before the board of directors declares a dividend or approves a capital distribution.
The Office of Thrift Supervision may disapprove a notice or application if:
|
|
|
the savings bank would be undercapitalized following the distribution; |
|
|
|
the proposed capital distribution raises safety and soundness concerns; or |
|
|
|
the capital distribution would violate a prohibition contained in any statute,
regulation, or agreement. |
In addition, the Federal Deposit Insurance Act provides that an insured depository institution
shall not make any capital distribution, if after making such distribution the institution would be
undercapitalized. A savings bank may not make a capital distribution that would reduce its
regulatory capital below the amount required for the liquidation account established in connection
with its conversion to stock form.
Liquidity. A federal savings bank is required to maintain a sufficient amount of liquid
assets to ensure its safe and sound operation. We met these liquidity requirements at December 31,
2010. Our liquidity levels have increased following the completion of the stock offering in
January 2010.
35
Community Reinvestment Act and Fair Lending Laws. All savings banks have a responsibility
under the Community Reinvestment Act and related regulations of the Office of Thrift Supervision to
help meet the credit needs of their communities, including low- and moderate-income borrowers. In
connection with its examination of a federal savings bank, the Office of Thrift Supervision is
required to
assess the savings banks record of compliance with the Community Reinvestment Act. In
addition, the Equal Credit Opportunity Act and the Fair Housing Act prohibit lenders from
discriminating in their lending practices on the basis of characteristics specified in those
statutes. A savings banks failure to comply with the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act
could, at a minimum, result in denial of certain corporate applications such as branches or
mergers, or in restrictions on its activities. The failure to comply with the Equal Credit
Opportunity Act and the Fair Housing Act could result in enforcement actions by the Office of
Thrift Supervision, as well as other federal regulatory agencies and the Department of Justice.
OmniAmerican Bank received a satisfactory Community Reinvestment Act rating in its most recent
federal examination. The Community Reinvestment Act requires all Federal Deposit Insurance-insured
institutions to publicly disclose their rating.
Transactions with Related Parties. A federal savings banks authority to engage in
transactions with its affiliates is limited by Office of Thrift Supervision regulations and by
Sections 23A and 23B of the Federal Reserve Act and its implementing Regulation W promulgated by
the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. An affiliate is generally a company that
controls, or is under common control with an insured depository institution such as OmniAmerican
Bank. OmniAmerican Bancorp, Inc. is an affiliate of OmniAmerican Bank. In general, transactions
between an insured depository institution and its affiliates are subject to certain quantitative
and collateral requirements. In addition, Office of Thrift Supervision regulations prohibit a
savings bank from lending to any of its affiliates that are engaged in activities that are not
permissible for bank holding companies and from purchasing the securities of any affiliate, other
than a subsidiary. Finally, transactions with affiliates must be consistent with safe and sound
banking practices, not involve low-quality assets and be on terms that are as favorable to the
institution as comparable transactions with non-affiliates. The Office of Thrift Supervision
requires savings banks to maintain detailed records of all transactions with affiliates.
OmniAmerican Banks authority to extend credit to its directors, executive officers, and 10%
stockholders, as well as to entities controlled by such persons, is currently governed by the
requirements of Sections 22(g) and 22(h) of the Federal Reserve Act and Regulation O of the Federal
Reserve Board. Among other things, these provisions require that extensions of credit to insiders:
|
(i) |
|
be made on terms that are substantially the same as, and follow credit
underwriting procedures that are not less stringent than, those prevailing for
comparable transactions with unaffiliated persons and that do not involve more than the
normal risk of repayment or present other unfavorable features; and |
|
(ii) |
|
not exceed certain limitations on the amount of credit extended to such
persons, individually and in the aggregate, which limits are based, in part, on the
amount of OmniAmerican Banks capital. |
In addition, extensions of credit in excess of certain limits must be approved by OmniAmerican
Banks board of directors.
Enforcement. The Office of Thrift Supervision has primary enforcement responsibility over
federal savings banks and has the authority to bring enforcement action against all
institution-affiliated parties, including directors, officers, stockholders, attorneys,
appraisers and accountants who knowingly or recklessly participate in wrongful action likely to
have an adverse effect on a federal savings bank. Formal enforcement action by the Office of
Thrift Supervision may range from the issuance of a capital directive or cease and desist order, to
removal of officers and/or directors of the institution, and the appointment of a receiver or
conservator. Civil penalties cover a wide range of violations and actions, and range up to $25,000
per day, unless a finding of reckless disregard is made, in which case penalties may be as high as
$1 million per day. The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation also has the authority to terminate
deposit insurance or to recommend to the Director of the Office of Thrift Supervision that
enforcement action be taken with respect to a particular savings institution. If action is
not taken by the Director, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation has authority to take action
under specified circumstances.
36
The Comptroller of the Currency will assume the Office of Thrift Supervisions enforcement
authority over federal savings banks pursuant to the Dodd-Frank Act.
Standards for Safety and Soundness. Federal law requires each federal banking agency to
prescribe certain standards for all insured depository institutions. These standards relate to,
among other things, internal controls, information systems and audit systems, loan documentation,
credit underwriting, interest rate risk exposure, asset growth, compensation, and other operational
and managerial standards as the agency deems appropriate. Interagency guidelines set forth the
safety and soundness standards that the federal banking agencies use to identify and address
problems at insured depository institutions before capital becomes impaired. If the appropriate
federal banking agency determines that an institution fails to meet any standard prescribed by the
guidelines, the agency may require the institution to submit to the agency an acceptable plan to
achieve compliance with the standard. If an institution fails to meet these standards, the
appropriate federal banking agency may require the institution to implement an acceptable
compliance plan. Failure to implement such a plan can result in further enforcement action,
including the issuance of a cease and desist order or the imposition of civil money penalties.
Regulatory Guidance to Subprime Lending. The federal bank regulatory agencies have issued
regulatory guidance relating to the examination of financial institutions that are engaged in
significant subprime lending activities. The regulatory guidance emphasizes that the federal
banking agencies believe that responsible subprime lending can expand credit access for consumers
and offer attractive returns for the savings institution. The guidance is applicable to savings
institutions that have subprime lending programs greater than or equal to 25% of core capital. As
part of the regulatory guidance, examiners must provide greater scrutiny of (i) an institutions
ability to administer its higher risk subprime portfolio, (ii) the allowance for loan losses to
ensure that the portion of the allowance allocated to the subprime portfolio is sufficient to
absorb the estimated credit losses for the portfolio, and (iii) the level of risk-based capital
that the savings institution has to ensure that such capital levels are adequate to support the
savings institutions subprime lending activities. As of December 31, 2010, the Office of Thrift
Supervision has not required us to restrict our subprime lending activities. Nor has it required
us to maintain specific levels in our allowance for loan losses or risk based capital as a result
of our subprime lending activities.
Prompt Corrective Action Regulations. Under prompt corrective action regulations, the Office
of Thrift Supervision is authorized and, under certain circumstances, required to take supervisory
actions against undercapitalized savings banks. For this purpose, a savings bank is placed in one
of the following five categories based on the savings banks capital:
|
|
|
well-capitalized (at least 5% leverage capital, 6% Tier 1 risk-based capital and 10%
total risk-based capital); |
|
|
|
adequately capitalized (at least 4% leverage capital, 4% Tier 1 risk-based capital
and 8% total risk-based capital); |
|
|
|
undercapitalized (less than 3% leverage capital, 4% Tier 1 risk-based capital and 8%
total risk-based capital); |
|
|
|
significantly undercapitalized (less than 3% leverage capital, 3% Tier 1 risk-based
capital and 6% total risk-based capital); and |
|
|
|
critically undercapitalized (less than 2% tangible capital). |
37
Generally, the Office of Thrift Supervision is required to appoint a receiver or conservator
for a savings bank that is critically undercapitalized within specific time frames. The
regulations also provide that a capital restoration plan must be filed with the Office of Thrift
Supervision within 45 days of the date a savings bank receives notice that it is
undercapitalized, significantly undercapitalized, or critically undercapitalized. Any
holding company of a savings bank that is required to submit a capital restoration plan must
guarantee the lesser of an amount equal to 5% of the savings banks assets at the time it was
notified or deemed to be undercapitalized by the Office of Thrift Supervision, or the amount
necessary to restore the savings bank to adequately capitalized status. This guarantee remains in
place until the Office of Thrift Supervision notifies the savings bank that it has maintained
adequately capitalized status for each of four consecutive calendar quarters, and the Office of
Thrift Supervision has the authority to require payment and collect payment under the guarantee.
Failure by a holding company to provide the required guarantee will result in certain operating
restrictions on the savings bank, such as restrictions on the ability to declare and pay dividends,
pay executive compensation and management fees, and increase assets or expand operations. The
Office of Thrift Supervision may also take any one of a number of discretionary supervisory actions
against undercapitalized savings banks, including the issuance of a capital directive and the
replacement of senior executive officers and directors.
At December 31, 2010, OmniAmerican Bank met the criteria for classification as
well-capitalized.
Recent Regulatory Developments. On March 17, 2008, the Office of Thrift Supervision issued a
cease and desist order requiring that we take prompt actions to adopt an information technology
remediation and action plan to address the deficiencies in our information technology security
system and to comply with Office of Thrift Supervision guidelines with respect to information
technology risks and controls. On June 11, 2010, the Office of Thrift Supervision terminated the
cease and desist order.
On June 2, 2007, we entered into a memorandum of understanding with the Office of Thrift
Supervision. As part of this memorandum, the Office of Thrift Supervision asked us to take a
number of specific corrective actions, and required that we not undertake certain actions without
prior Office of Thrift Supervision approval. On February 25, 2010, we entered into a revised
memorandum of understanding which memorialized the outstanding portions of the June 2, 2007
memorandum that were not suspended by the Office of Thrift Supervision, plus it added the
requirement that we revise our business plan to reflect the business that was approved by the
Office of Thrift Supervision in connection with our conversion from mutual to stock form. The
Office of Thrift Supervision terminated the memorandum of understanding in September 2010.
Insurance of Deposit Accounts. The Dodd-Frank Act increases the maximum amount of deposit
insurance for banks, savings institutions and credit unions to $250,000 per depositor, retroactive
to January 1, 2009. Non-interest bearing transaction accounts have unlimited deposit insurance
through December 31, 2012.
Pursuant to the Federal Deposit Insurance Reform Act of 2005 (the Reform Act), the Federal
Deposit Insurance Corporation is authorized to set the reserve ratio for the Deposit Insurance Fund
annually at between 1.15% and 1.5% of estimated insured deposits. The Dodd-Frank Act mandates that
the statutory minimum reserve ratio of the Deposit Insurance Fund increase from 1.15% to 1.35% of
insured deposits by September 30, 2020. Banks with assets of less than $10 billion are exempt from
any additional assessments necessary to increase the reserve fund above 1.15%.
38
As part of a plan to restore the reserve ratio to 1.15%, the Federal Deposit Insurance
Corporation imposed a special assessment equal to five basis points of assets less Tier 1 capital
as of June 30, 2009,
which was payable on September 30, 2009. In addition, the Federal Deposit Insurance
Corporation has increased its quarterly deposit insurance assessment rates and amended the method
by which rates are calculated. Beginning in the second quarter of 2009, institutions are assigned
an initial base assessment rate ranging from 12 to 45 basis points of deposits depending on risk
category. The initial base assessment is then adjusted based upon the level of unsecured debt,
secured liabilities, and brokered deposits to establish a total base assessment rate ranging from
seven to 77.5 basis points. OmniAmerican Banks Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation premium
assessment was $1.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2010, a decrease of $553,000 from the
assessment for the year ended December 31, 2009 of $2.1 million, including the special assessment.
On November 12, 2009, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation approved a final rule
requiring insured depository institutions to prepay on December 30, 2009, their estimated quarterly
risk-based assessments for the fourth quarter of 2009, and for all of 2010, 2011, and 2012.
Estimated assessments for the fourth quarter of 2009 and for all of 2010 are based upon the
assessment rate in effect on September 30, 2009, with three basis points added for the 2011 and
2012 assessment rates. In addition, a 5% annual growth in the assessment base is assumed. Prepaid
assessments are to be applied against the actual quarterly assessments until exhausted, and may not
be applied to any special assessments that may occur in the future. Any unused prepayments will be
returned to the institution on June 30, 2013. On December 30, 2009, we prepaid $6.4 million in
estimated assessment fees for the fourth quarter of 2009 through 2012. Because the prepaid
assessments represent the prepayment of future expense, they do not affect our regulatory capital
(the prepaid asset will have a risk-weighting of 0%) or tax obligations.
In February 2011, as required by the Dodd-Frank Act, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
adopted a final rule revising the assessment base to consist of average consolidated total assets
during the assessment period minus the average tangible equity during the assessment period. In
addition, the final rule eliminates the adjustment for secured borrowings and makes certain other
changes to the impact of unsecured borrowings and brokered deposits on an institutions deposit
insurance assessment. The proposed rule also revises the assessment rate schedule to provide
assessments ranging from five to 45 basis points. The final rule is effective April 1, 2011.
Insurance of deposits may be terminated by the Federal Deposit Insurance
Corporation upon a finding that an institution has engaged in unsafe or unsound practices, is in an
unsafe or unsound condition to continue operations, or has violated any applicable law, regulation,
rule, order, or condition imposed by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. We do not currently
know of any practice, condition, or violation that may lead to termination of our deposit
insurance.
In addition to the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation assessments, the Financing
Corporation (FICO) is authorized to impose and collect, with the approval of the Federal Deposit
Insurance Corporation, assessments for anticipated payments, issuance costs, and custodial fees on
bonds issued by the FICO in the 1980s to recapitalize the former Federal Savings and Loan Insurance
Corporation. The bonds issued by the FICO are due to mature in 2017 through 2019. For the quarter
ended December 31, 2010, the annualized FICO assessment was equal to 1.02 basis points for each
$100 in domestic deposits maintained at an institution.
U.S. Treasurys Troubled Asset Relief Program Capital Purchase Program. The Emergency
Economic Stabilization Act of 2008, which was enacted on October 3, 2008, provides the U.S.
Secretary of the Treasury with broad authority to implement certain actions to help restore
stability and liquidity to U.S. financial markets. One of the programs resulting from the
legislation is the Troubled Asset Relief Program Capital Purchase Program (CPP), which provides
direct equity investment by the U.S. Treasury Department in perpetual preferred stock of qualified
financial institutions. The program is voluntary and requires an institution to comply with a
number of restrictions and provisions, including
limits on executive compensation, stock redemptions and declaration of dividends. The CPP provides
for a minimum investment of one percent of total risk-weighted assets and a maximum investment
equal to the lesser of three percent of total risk-weighted assets or $25 billion. Participation
in the program is not automatic and is subject to approval by the U.S. Treasury Department. We
opted not to participate in the CPP.
39
Prohibitions Against Tying Arrangements. Federal savings banks are prohibited, subject to
some exceptions, from extending credit to or offering any other service, or fixing or varying the
consideration for such extension of credit or service, on the condition that the customer obtain
some additional service from the institution or its affiliates or not obtain services of a
competitor of the institution.
Federal Home Loan Bank System. OmniAmerican Bank is a member of the Federal Home Loan Bank
System, which consists of 12 regional Federal Home Loan Banks. The Federal Home Loan Bank System
provides a central credit facility primarily for member institutions as well as other entities
involved in home mortgage lending. As a member of the Federal Home Loan Bank of Dallas,
OmniAmerican Bank is required to acquire and hold shares of capital stock in the Federal Home Loan
Bank. As of December 31, 2010, OmniAmerican Bank was in compliance with this requirement with a
balance of $2.9 million in Federal Home Loan Bank stock.
Other Regulations
Interest and other charges collected or contracted for by OmniAmerican Bank are subject to
state usury laws and federal laws concerning interest rates. OmniAmerican Banks operations are
also subject to federal laws applicable to credit transactions, such as the:
|
|
|
Truth-In-Lending Act, governing disclosures of credit terms to consumer borrowers; |
|
|
|
Home Mortgage Disclosure Act, requiring financial institutions to provide
information to enable the public and public officials to determine whether a financial
institution is fulfilling its obligation to help meet the housing needs of the
community it serves; |
|
|
|
Equal Credit Opportunity Act, prohibiting discrimination on the basis of race,
creed, or other prohibited factors in extending credit; |
|
|
|
Fair Credit Reporting Act, governing the use and provision of information to credit
reporting agencies; |
|
|
|
Fair Debt Collection Act, governing the manner in which consumer debts may be
collected by collection agencies; |
|
|
|
Truth in Savings Act; and |
|
|
|
rules and regulations of the various federal agencies charged with the
responsibility of implementing such federal laws. |
40
The operations of OmniAmerican Bank also are subject to the:
|
|
|
Right to Financial Privacy Act, which imposes a duty to maintain confidentiality of
consumer financial records and prescribes procedures for complying with administrative
subpoenas of financial records; |
|
|
|
Electronic Funds Transfer Act and Regulation E promulgated thereunder, which govern
automatic deposits to and withdrawals from deposit accounts and customers rights and
liabilities arising from the use of automated teller machines and other electronic
banking services; |
|
|
|
Check Clearing for the 21st Century Act (also known as Check 21), which
gives substitute checks, such as digital check images and copies made from that
image, the same legal standing as the original paper check; |
|
|
|
The USA PATRIOT Act, which requires savings banks to, among other things, establish
broadened anti-money laundering compliance programs, and due diligence policies and
controls to ensure the detection and reporting of money laundering. Such required
compliance programs are intended to supplement existing compliance requirements that
also apply to financial institutions under the Bank Secrecy Act and the Office of
Foreign Assets Control regulations; and |
|
|
|
The Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act, which places limitations on the sharing of consumer
financial information by financial institutions with unaffiliated third parties.
Specifically, the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act requires all financial institutions offering
financial products or services to retail customers to provide such customers with the
financial institutions privacy policy and provide such customers the opportunity to
opt out of the sharing of certain personal financial information with unaffiliated
third parties. |
Holding Company Regulation
General. Upon completion of the conversion, OmniAmerican Bancorp, Inc. became a
non-diversified savings and loan holding company within the meaning of the Home Owners Loan Act.
As such, OmniAmerican Bancorp, Inc. will be registered with the Office of Thrift Supervision and is
subject to Office of Thrift Supervision regulations, examinations, supervision, and reporting
requirements. In addition, the Office of Thrift Supervision has enforcement authority over
OmniAmerican Bancorp, Inc. and its subsidiaries. Among other things, this authority permits the
Office of Thrift Supervision to restrict or prohibit activities that are determined to be a serious
risk to the subsidiary savings institution. Under the Dodd-Frank Act, the functions of the Office
of Thrift Supervision relating to savings and loan holding companies and their subsidiaries, as
well as rulemaking and supervision authority over thrift holding companies, will be transferred to
the Federal Reserve Board. There can be no assurance that the Federal Reserve Board will not
impose additional regulations on savings and loan holding companies.
Permissible Activities. Under present law, the business activities of OmniAmerican Bancorp,
Inc. are generally limited to those activities permissible for financial holding companies under
Section 4(k) of the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956, as amended, or for multiple savings and loan
holding companies. A financial holding company may engage in activities that are financial in
nature, including underwriting equity securities and insurance, as well as activities that are
incidental to financial activities or complementary to a financial activity. A multiple savings
and loan holding company is generally limited to activities permissible for bank holding companies
under Section 4(c)(8) of the Bank Holding Company Act, subject to the prior approval of the Office
of Thrift Supervision, and certain additional activities authorized by Office of Thrift
Supervision regulations.
41
Federal law prohibits a savings and loan holding company, including OmniAmerican Bancorp,
Inc., directly or indirectly, or through one or more subsidiaries, from acquiring more than 5% of
another savings institution or holding company thereof, without prior written approval of the
Office of Thrift Supervision. It also prohibits the acquisition or retention of, with certain
exceptions, more than 5% of a nonsubsidiary company engaged in activities that are not closely
related to banking or financial in nature, or acquiring or retaining control of an institution
that is not federally insured. In evaluating applications by holding companies to acquire savings
institutions, the Office of Thrift Supervision must consider the financial and managerial
resources, future prospects of the company and institution involved, the effect of the acquisition
on the risk to the federal deposit insurance fund, the convenience and needs of the community, and
competitive factors.
The Office of Thrift Supervision is prohibited from approving any acquisition that would
result in a multiple savings and loan holding company controlling savings institutions in more
than one state, subject to two exceptions:
|
(i) |
|
the approval of interstate supervisory acquisitions by savings and loan holding
companies; and |
|
(ii) |
|
the acquisition of a savings institution in another state if the laws of the
state of the target savings institution specifically permit such acquisition. |
The states vary in the extent to which they permit interstate savings and loan holding
company acquisitions.
Capital. Savings and loan holding companies are not currently subject to specific
regulatory capital requirements. The Dodd-Frank Act, however, requires the Federal Reserve Board
to promulgate consolidated capital requirements for depository institution holding companies that
are no less stringent, both quantitatively and in terms of components of capital, than those
applicable to institutions themselves. Instruments such as cumulative preferred stock and trust
preferred securities will no longer be includable as Tier 1 capital as is currently the case with
bank holding companies. Instruments issued by May 19, 2010 will be grandfathered for companies
with consolidated assets of $15 billion or less. There is a five-year transition period (from the
July 21, 2010 effective date of the Dodd-Frank Act) before the capital requirements will apply to
savings and loan holding companies.
Source of Strength. The Dodd-Frank Act also extends the source of strength doctrine to
savings and loan holding companies. The regulatory agencies must issue regulations requiring that
all bank and savings and loan holding companies serve as a source of strength to their subsidiary
depository institutions by providing capital, liquidity, and other support in times of financial
stress.
Dividends. The Bank must notify the Office of Thrift Supervision thirty (30) days before
declaring any dividend to the Company. The financial impact of a holding company on its
subsidiary institution is a matter that is evaluated by the Office of Thrift Supervision, and the
agency has authority to order cessation of activities or divestiture of subsidiaries deemed to
pose a threat to the safety and soundness of the institution.
42
Federal Securities Laws
The shares of common stock issued in our initial public stock offering have been registered
under the Securities Act of 1933. Our common stock is registered with the Securities and Exchange
Commission under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. We are subject to the information, proxy
solicitation, insider trading restrictions and other requirements under the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934.
The registration under the Securities Act of 1933 of shares of common stock issued in the
stock offering does not cover the resale of those shares. Shares of common stock purchased by
persons who are not our affiliates may be resold without registration. Shares purchased by our
affiliates will be subject to the resale restrictions of Rule 144 under the Securities Act of 1933.
If we meet the current public information requirements of Rule 144 under the Securities Act of
1933, each affiliate of ours that complies with the other conditions of Rule 144, including those
that require the affiliates sale to be aggregated with those of other persons, would be able to
sell in the public market, without registration, a number of shares not to exceed, in any
three-month period, the greater of 1% of our outstanding shares, or the average weekly volume of
trading in the shares during the preceding four calendar weeks. In the future, we may permit
affiliates to have their shares registered for sale under the Securities Act of 1933.
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 addresses, among other issues, corporate governance, auditing
and accounting, executive compensation, and enhanced and timely disclosure of corporate
information. As directed by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer are required to certify that our quarterly and annual reports do not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact. The rules adopted by the Securities and Exchange Commission
under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act have several requirements, including having these officers certify
that: they are responsible for establishing, maintaining, and regularly evaluating the
effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting; they have made certain disclosures
to our auditors and the audit committee of the board of directors about our internal control over
financial reporting; and they have included information in our quarterly and annual reports about
their evaluation and whether there have been changes in our internal control over financial
reporting or in other factors that could materially affect internal control over financial
reporting. We are subject to further reporting and audit requirements beginning with the fiscal
year ended December 31, 2010 under the requirements of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. We have prepared
policies, procedures and systems designed to ensure compliance with these regulations.
TAXATION
Federal Taxation
General. OmniAmerican Bancorp, Inc. and OmniAmerican Bank are subject to federal income
taxation in the same general manner as other corporations, with some exceptions discussed below.
The following discussion of federal taxation is intended only to summarize material federal income
tax matters and is not a comprehensive description of the tax rules applicable to OmniAmerican
Bancorp, Inc. and OmniAmerican Bank.
Method of Accounting. For federal income tax purposes, OmniAmerican Bank currently reports
its income and expenses on the accrual method of accounting and uses a tax year ending December
31st for filing its consolidated federal income tax returns. The Small Business Protection Act of
1996 eliminated the use of the reserve method of accounting for bad debt reserves by savings
institutions, effective for taxable years beginning after 1995.
43
Minimum Tax. The Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, imposes an alternative minimum
tax at a rate of 20% on a base of regular taxable income plus certain tax preferences, referred to
as alternative minimum taxable income. The alternative minimum tax is payable to the extent
alternative minimum taxable income is in excess of an exemption amount. Net operating losses can,
in general, offset no more than 90% of alternative minimum taxable income. Certain payments of
alternative minimum tax may be used as credits against regular tax liabilities in future years. At
December 31, 2010, OmniAmerican Bank had a minimum tax credit carryforward of $82,100.
Net Operating Loss Carryovers. Generally, a financial institution may carry back net
operating losses to the preceding two taxable years and forward to the succeeding 20 taxable years.
However, as a result of recent legislation, subject to certain limitations, the carryback period
for net operating losses incurred in 2008 or 2009 (but not both years) has been expanded to five
years. At December 31, 2010, OmniAmerican Bank had a net operating loss carryforward of $2.8
million for federal income tax purposes.
Corporate Dividends. We may exclude from our income 100% of dividends received from
OmniAmerican Bank as a member of the same affiliated group of corporations.
Audit of Tax Returns. OmniAmerican Banks federal income tax returns have not been audited in
the most recent five-year period.
State Taxation
In 2006, the State of Texas enacted legislation replacing its franchise tax with a margin tax
effective with tax reports filed on or after January 1, 2008. The Texas margin tax is computed by
applying the applicable tax rate (1% for most entities) to the margin. Margin equals the lesser of
three calculations: total revenue minus cost of goods sold; total revenue minus compensation; or
total revenue times 70%. Lending institutions may deduct interest expense as cost of goods sold.
Our calculation in 2010 was total revenue minus compensation expense.
44
Our loan portfolio has greater risk than those of many savings banks due to the substantial number
of automobile and other consumer loans in our portfolio.
We have a diversified loan portfolio with a substantial number of loans secured by collateral
other than owner-occupied one- to four-family residential real estate. Our loan portfolio includes
a substantial number of indirect automobile loans which are automobile loans referred to us by
participating automobile dealerships. At December 31, 2010, our consumer loans totaled $199.9
million, or 29.9% of our total loan portfolio, and indirect automobile loans were the largest
category of consumer loans, representing 23.4% of total loans at December 31, 2010. At that date,
we had consumer loans 60 days or more past due of $342,000, or 6.9% of total loans 60 days or more
past due. Indirect automobile loans represented $282,000, or 5.7% of total loans 60 days or more
past due at December 31, 2010. Our consumer loan portfolio also includes direct automobile loans,
unsecured loans and loans secured by other personal property. Consumer loans generally have
greater risk of loss or default than one- to four-family residential real estate loans,
particularly in the case of loans that are secured by rapidly depreciable assets, such as
automobiles, or loans that are unsecured. In these cases, we face the risk that any collateral for
a defaulted loan may not provide an adequate source of repayment of the outstanding loan balance.
Thus, the recovery and sale of such property could be insufficient to compensate us for the
principal outstanding on these loans. Furthermore, the application of various federal and state
laws, including bankruptcy and insolvency laws, may limit our ability to recover on such loans.
Finally, because indirect automobile loan applications are completed by automobile dealerships, we
assume the risks associated with a dealership properly complying with federal, state, and local
consumer protection laws.
As a result of our relatively large portfolio of consumer loans, it may become necessary to
increase our provision for loan losses in the event our losses on these loans increase, which would
reduce our profits. In addition, a portion of our automobile loans are made to borrowers with
credit scores that would cause such loans to be considered subprime. At December 31, 2010, $13.5
million, or 7.5% of our total automobile loan portfolio, consisted of automobile loans where the
borrowers credit score was 660 or less (a possible indication of a credit-impaired borrower). See
Item 1. Business Business of OmniAmerican Bank Lending Activities Consumer Lending.
A portion of our loan portfolio consists of loans made to persons with impaired credit or with
reduced documentation, which presents greater risk of loss or delinquency.
As of December 31, 2010, $40.3 million, or 14.8%, of our one- to four-family residential real
estate loans were to borrowers with no credit score or a credit score of 660 or less (a possible
indication of a credit-impaired borrower) and an additional credit weakness. Weakened credit
characteristics of a borrower may include prior loan payment delinquencies, foreclosure of prior
loans, bankruptcies, or prior non-payment of loans. Loans to such borrowers may also present a
greater credit risk to us based upon the borrowers debt to income ratio, the results of a credit
review, or other criteria that indicate that the borrower may have an insufficient or impaired
credit history.
We also have loans to borrowers who provide limited or no documentation of assets or
income, known as stated income loans. At December 31, 2010, we had $12.1 million of one- to
four-family residential real estate stated income loans, or 4.5% of our one- to four-family
residential real estate loans. As of December 31, 2010, we had $7.1 million of interest-only one-
to four-family residential real estate loans. This amount represents 2.6% of our total one- to
four-family residential real estate loans, with $4.7 million of our interest-only loans comprised
of adjustable-rate loans. The interest rate on these loans is initially fixed for three, five or
seven year terms and then adjusts in accordance with the terms of the loan to require payment of
both principal and interest in order to amortize the loan for the remainder of the term.
45
In 2008, we began purchasing one- to four-family residential real estate loans, which
included subprime, stated income and interest-only loans, at a discount to the original principal
balance of the mortgage loan. As of December 31, 2010, the total outstanding balance of all
purchased one- to four-family residential real estate loans was $23.9 million, or 8.8% of our one-
to four-family residential real estate loans and 3.6% of our total loans, while the carrying value
of such loans, net of purchase discounts, was $20.4 million. Our purchased one- to four-family
residential real estate loans included $4.0 million of subprime loans as of December 31, 2010. In
addition, these purchased one- to four-family residential real estate loans included $11.2 million
of stated income loans and $4.6 million of interest-only loans (of which $3.0 million were also
stated income loans). At December 31, 2010, the purchased subprime, stated income and
interest-only loans represented 1.5%, 4.1% and 1.7%, respectively, of our total one- to
four-family residential real estate loans. We intend to continue to purchase subprime, stated
income and interest-only loans, as market conditions permit, provided we are able to obtain the
loans at a sufficient discount to the loan balance to compensate us for the added risk associated
with such loans.
These types of one- to four-family residential real estate loans are generally considered to
have a greater risk of delinquency and foreclosure than conforming loans and may require greater
provisions for loan losses. Although we have not experienced large increases in delinquencies or
foreclosures in this portfolio in relation to our other residential real estate loans, our
residential real estate loan portfolio may be adversely affected in the event of a continued
downturn in regional or national economic conditions. In addition, the value of the real estate
securing these loans may become less than any remaining loan balance if local property values
deteriorate further. Consequently, we could sustain loan losses and be required to establish a
higher provision for loan losses.
Our loan portfolio has more risk due to the recent change in our lending emphasis, which has
resulted in a greater percentage of new one- to four-family residential real estate loans.
Between 2006 and 2010, the composition of our loan portfolio changed significantly as the
dollar amount and percentage of our loans secured by one- to four-family residential real estate
increased to $271.8 million, or 40.6% of total loans, at December 31, 2010, from $164.6 million, or
22.5% of total loans, at December 31, 2006. During this period, our consumer loans decreased to
$199.9 million, or 29.9% of total loans, at December 31, 2010, from $432.2 million, or 59.2% of
total loans, at December 31, 2006. As a result of this change in our lending emphasis, a
significant portion of our one- to four-family residential real estate loans are relatively new or
unseasoned, and have not been outstanding for a sufficient period of time to demonstrate
performance and indicate the potential risks in the loan portfolio. For example, our unseasoned
adjustable-rate residential real estate loans have not been subject to an interest rate environment
that required them to adjust to the maximum interest rate level and may involve risks resulting
from potentially larger payment obligations by borrowers. At December 31, 2010, one- to
four-family residential real estate loans delinquent 60 days or more totaled $2.3 million, or 46.4%
of total delinquent loans of 60 days or more.
We have increased our levels of non-residential real estate loans and commercial business loans,
which has increased our exposure to credit risk.
Since our conversion from a credit union to a savings bank, we have increased the amount of
loans secured by commercial real estate, as well as real estate construction and commercial
business loans. At December 31, 2010, our portfolio of commercial real estate loans totaled $87.9
million, or 13.1% of our total loans, compared to $74.2 million, or 10.2% of our total loans, at
December 31, 2006. At December 31, 2010, our portfolio of real estate construction loans totaled
$34.5 million, or 5.2% of our total loans, compared to $28.8 million, or 4.0% of our total loans,
at December 31, 2006. At December 31, 2010, our portfolio of commercial business loans totaled
$48.7 million, or 7.3% of our total loans, compared to $11.6 million, or 1.6%, of our total loans
at December 31, 2006. At December 31, 2010, our commercial real estate loans that were delinquent
60 days or more totaled $1.7 million, or 34.7% of total
delinquent loans of 60 days or more. At December 31, 2010, our commercial business loans that
were delinquent 60 days or more totaled $359,000, or 7.3% of total delinquent loans of 60 days or
more. At December 31, 2010, we had no real estate construction loans that were delinquent 60 days
or more. We intend to continue to emphasize the origination of these types of loans consistent
with safety and soundness standards.
46
Commercial real estate loans, real estate construction loans, and commercial business loans
generally have a greater risk of loss than owner-occupied one- to four-family residential real
estate loans. Repayment of commercial real estate, real estate construction and commercial
business loans generally depends, in large part, on sufficient income from the property or the
borrowers business to cover operating expenses and debt service. These types of loans typically
involve larger loan balances to single borrowers or groups of related borrowers compared to one- to
four-family residential real estate loans. Changes in economic conditions that are beyond the
control of the borrower and lender may affect the value of the security for the loan, the future
cash flow of the affected property or business, or the marketability of a construction project with
respect to loans originated for the acquisition and development of property. As we increase our
portfolio of these loans, our level of non-performing loans may increase.
We intend to emphasize business lending and marketing our products and services to small and
medium-sized businesses. These small and medium-sized businesses generally have fewer financial
resources in terms of capital or borrowing capacity than larger entities. If general economic
conditions negatively affect these businesses, our results of operations and financial condition
may be adversely affected.
Protecting our business from identity theft and the theft of other customer data increases our cost
of operations. To the extent that we, or our third party providers, are unable to prevent the loss
of customer information, our operations may become disrupted and our net income may be adversely
affected.
In recent years, the breach of computer and network systems of businesses, such as banks, by
national and international criminals (cyber-fraud) has become more prevalent. Financial fraud is a
growing risk of doing business for financial institutions. In January 2008, we experienced a
breach of security involving our ATM/debit card system. Throughout 2008, we upgraded our systems
and hired additional personnel and outside consultants to remediate this problem.
In August 2009, law enforcement authorities arrested members of the largest identity theft
operation ever conducted in the United States. The identity theft operation included the theft of
information from a number of retail companies and Heartland Payment Systems, a payment transaction
processing center used by many merchants. As a result of this identity theft operation, a number
of our customers who had their debit card transactions processed through Heartland Payment Systems
had their customer information breached. We have remediated the problem and our cybersecurity
insurance policy reimbursed us $905,000 for costs we incurred associated with the breach of
Heartland Payment Systems. In 2009, we incurred $335,000 of unreimbursed expenses related to this
breach, which represented the fees imposed on us by VISA to process merchant reimbursements for our
customers, the cost of reissuing debit cards to our customers, and the expense of the insurance
deductible.
We must protect our computer systems and network from physical break-ins, security breaches,
and other disruptive problems caused by the Internet or other users. Moreover, third party
providers, such as Heartland Payment Systems, must also take similar actions to protect customer
information. We rely on encryption and authentication technology to provide the security and
authentication necessary to effect secure transmissions of confidential information, as do our
third party providers. However, security
measures implemented by us or our third party providers may not prevent cyber-fraud. Advances
in computer capabilities, new discoveries in the field of cryptography, or other developments could
result in a compromise or breach of the algorithms we and our third-party service providers use to
protect customer transaction data. If any compromise of our security or the security of our third
party providers were to occur, it could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial
condition, and results of operations.
47
We could record future impairment losses on our holdings of investment securities. We may not
receive full future interest payments on these securities.
Our investment portfolio includes trust preferred securities and private label collateralized
mortgage obligations. We periodically review the performance of these securities and conduct tests
for their impairment. As of December 31, 2010, we determined that no other than temporary
impairment loss associated with our investment securities was required to be charged to income. A
number of factors or combinations of factors could cause us to conclude in one or more future
reporting periods that an unrealized loss that exists with respect to these securities constitutes
an additional impairment that is other than temporary, which could result in material losses to us.
These factors include, but are not
limited to, continued failure to make scheduled interest payments, an increase in the severity of
the unrealized loss on a particular security, an increase in the continuous duration of the
unrealized loss without an improvement in value, or changes in market conditions and/or industry or
issuer specific factors that would render us unable to forecast a full recovery in value. In
addition, the fair values of these investment securities could decline if the overall economy and
the financial condition of some of the issuers continue to deteriorate and there remains limited
liquidity for these securities.
If our allowance for loan losses is not sufficient to cover actual loan losses, our earnings will
decrease.
We make various assumptions and judgments about the collectability of our loan portfolio,
including the creditworthiness of our borrowers and the value of the real estate and other assets
serving as collateral for the repayment of many of our loans. In determining the amount of the
allowance for loan losses, we review our loans and our loss and delinquency experience, and we
evaluate economic conditions. If our assumptions are incorrect, our allowance for loan losses may
not be sufficient to cover probable incurred losses in our loan portfolio, requiring us to make
additions to our allowance for loan losses. While our allowance for loan losses was 1.33% of total
loans at December 31, 2010, material additions to our allowance could materially decrease our net
income.
In addition, bank regulators periodically review our allowance for loan losses and may require
us to increase our allowance for loan losses or recognize further loan charge-offs. Any increase
in our allowance for loan losses or loan charge-offs as required by these regulatory authorities
may have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.
Future changes in interest rates could reduce our profits.
Our ability to make a profit depends largely on our net interest income, which could be
negatively affected by changes in interest rates. Net interest income is the difference between:
|
|
|
the interest income we earn on our interest-earning assets, such as loans and
securities; and |
|
|
|
the interest expense we incur on our interest-bearing liabilities, such as deposits
and borrowings. |
48
As a result of our focus on one- to four-family residential real estate loans, the interest
rates on our loans are generally fixed for a longer period of time than the interest rates on our
deposits. Additionally, many of our investment securities have lengthy maturities with fixed
interest rates. Like many savings institutions, our focus on deposit accounts as a source of
funds, which have either no stated maturity or shorter contractual maturities than mortgage loans,
results in our liabilities having a shorter average duration than our assets. For example, as of
December 31, 2010, 32.4% of our loans had maturities of 15 years or longer, while 56.6% of our
certificates of deposit had maturities of one year or less. This imbalance can create significant
earnings volatility because market interest rates change over time. In a period of rising interest
rates, the interest we earn on our assets, such as loans and investments, may not increase as
rapidly as the interest we pay on our liabilities, such as deposits. In a period of declining
interest rates, the interest income we earn on our assets may decrease more rapidly than the
interest expense we incur on our liabilities, as borrowers prepay mortgage loans and
mortgage-backed securities and callable investment securities are called or prepaid, thereby
requiring us to reinvest these cash flows at lower interest rates.
In addition, changes in interest rates can affect the average lives of loans and
mortgage-backed and related securities. A reduction in interest rates generally results in
increased prepayments of loans and mortgage-backed and related securities, as borrowers refinance
their debt in order to reduce their borrowing costs. This creates reinvestment risk, which is the
risk that we may not be able to reinvest prepayments at rates that are comparable to the rates we
earned on the prepaid loans or securities. Conversely, increases in interest rates may decrease
loan demand and/or make it more difficult for borrowers to repay adjustable-rate loans.
Changes in interest rates also affect the current fair value of our interest-earning
securities portfolio. Generally, the value of securities moves inversely with changes in interest
rates. At December 31, 2010, the fair value of our available for sale securities portfolio,
consisting of mortgage-backed securities issued by U.S. Government sponsored enterprises,
collateralized mortgage obligations, trust preferred securities, and equity securities totaled
$317.8 million. Gross unrealized gains on these securities totaled $1.8 million at December 31,
2010.
We evaluate interest rate sensitivity using an Office of Thrift Supervision model that
estimates the change in our net portfolio value over a range of interest rate scenarios, also known
as a rate shock analysis. Net portfolio value is the discounted present value of expected cash
flows from assets, liabilities, and off-balance sheet contracts. As of September 30, 2010 (the
most recent date available), the Office of Thrift Supervision rate shock analysis indicated that
our net portfolio value would decrease by $22.9 million if there was an instantaneous 200 basis
point increase in market interest rates. See Item 7A Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures
about Market Risk Management of Market Risk.
Negative developments in the financial industry and the domestic and international credit markets
may adversely affect our operations and results.
Negative developments in the global credit and securitization markets during the past three
years have resulted in a global recession and significant uncertainty in the financial markets.
Loan portfolio quality has deteriorated at many financial institutions, reflecting in part, the
severely weakened U.S. economy and rising unemployment. In addition, the values of real estate
collateral supporting many commercial loans and home mortgages have declined and may continue to
decline. Bank and bank holding company stock prices have been negatively affected, as has the
ability of banks and bank holding companies to raise capital or borrow in the debt markets.
Specifically, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Quarterly Banking Profile has reported that
noncurrent assets plus other real estate owned as a percentage of assets for FDIC-insured financial
institutions was 3.11% as of December 31, 2010, compared to 3.36% as of December 31, 2009 and 1.91%
as of December 31, 2008. For the year ended December 31, 2010, the Federal Deposit Insurance
Corporation Quarterly Banking Profile has reported
that annualized return on average assets was 0.66% for FDIC-insured financial institutions compared
to (0.08)% for the year ended December 31, 2009 and 0.03% for the year ended December 31, 2008.
The NASDAQ Bank Index declined 30.6% between December 31, 2007 and December 31, 2010. At December
31, 2010, our noncurrent assets plus other real estate owned as a percentage of total assets was
2.19%, and our return on average assets was 0.15% for the year ended December 31, 2010.
49
The potential exists for additional federal or state laws and regulations regarding lending
and funding practices and liquidity standards, and bank regulatory agencies are expected to
continue to be active in responding to concerns and trends identified in examinations, including
the expected issuance of many formal enforcement orders. Actions taken to date, as well as
potential actions, may not have the beneficial effects that are intended. In addition, new laws,
regulations, and other regulatory changes could increase our Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
insurance premiums, may also increase our costs of regulatory compliance and of doing business, and
may otherwise adversely affect our operations. New laws, regulations, and other regulatory
changes, along with negative developments in the financial services industry and the domestic and
international credit markets, may significantly affect the markets in which we do business, the
markets for and value of our loans and investments, and our ongoing operations, costs and
profitability. Further, continued declines in the stock market in general, or for stock of
financial institutions and their holding companies, may affect our stock performance.
Strong competition within our market areas may limit our growth and profitability.
Competition in the banking and financial services industry is intense. In our market areas,
we compete with commercial banks, savings institutions, mortgage brokerage firms, credit unions,
finance companies, mutual funds, insurance companies, and brokerage and investment banking firms
operating locally and elsewhere. Some of our competitors have greater name recognition and market
presence that benefit them in attracting business, and offer certain services that we do not or
cannot provide. In addition, larger competitors may be able to price loans and deposits more
aggressively than we do, which could affect our ability to grow and remain profitable on a
long-term basis. Our profitability depends upon our continued ability to successfully compete in
our market areas. If we must raise interest rates paid on deposits or lower interest rates charged
on our loans in order to remain competitive, our net interest margin and profitability could be
adversely affected.
Financial reform legislation recently enacted by Congress will, among other things, eliminate the
Office of Thrift Supervision, tighten capital standards, create a new Consumer Financial Protection
Bureau and result in new laws and regulations that are expected to increase our costs of
operations.
Congress recently enacted the Dodd-Frank Act, which will significantly change the current bank
regulatory structure and affect the lending, investment, trading, and operating activities of
financial institutions and their holding companies. The Dodd-Frank Act will eliminate our current
primary federal regulator, the Office of Thrift Supervision, and require OmniAmerican Bank to be
regulated by the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (the primary federal regulator for
national banks). The Dodd-Frank Act also authorizes the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve
System to supervise and regulate all savings and loan holding companies like OmniAmerican Bancorp,
Inc., in addition to bank holding companies which it currently regulates. The Dodd-Frank Act also
requires the Federal Reserve Board to set minimum capital levels for bank holding companies that
are as stringent as those required for the insured depository subsidiaries, and the components of
Tier 1 capital would be restricted to capital instruments that are currently considered to be Tier
1 capital for insured depository institutions. Savings and loan holding companies are subject to a
five year transition period before the holding company capital requirement will apply. The
legislation also establishes a floor for capital of insured depository institutions that cannot be
lower than the standards in effect today, and directs the federal banking regulators to implement
new leverage and capital requirements within 18 months that take into account off-balance sheet
activities and other risks, including risks relating to securitized products and derivatives.
50
The Dodd-Frank Act also creates a new Consumer Financial Protection Bureau with broad powers
to supervise and enforce consumer protection laws. The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau has
broad rule-making authority for a wide range of consumer protection laws that apply to all banks
and savings institutions such as OmniAmerican Bank, including the authority to prohibit unfair,
deceptive, or abusive acts and practices. The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau has
examination and enforcement authority over all banks and savings institutions with more than $10
billion in assets. Banks and savings institutions with $10 billion or less in assets will be
examined by their applicable bank regulators. The new legislation also weakens the federal
preemption available for national banks and federal savings associations, and gives state attorneys
general the ability to enforce applicable federal consumer protection laws.
The legislation also broadens the base for Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation insurance
assessments. Assessments will be based on the average consolidated total assets less tangible
equity capital of a financial institution. The Dodd-Frank Act also permanently increases the
maximum amount of deposit insurance for banks, savings institutions, and credit unions to $250,000
per depositor, retroactive to January 1, 2008, and non-interest bearing transaction accounts have
unlimited deposit insurance through December 31, 2012. The Dodd-Frank Act will increase
stockholder influence over boards of directors by requiring companies to give stockholders a
non-binding vote on executive compensation and so-called golden parachute payments, and by
authorizing the Securities and Exchange Commission to promulgate rules that would allow
stockholders to nominate their own candidates using a companys proxy materials. The legislation
also directs the Federal Reserve Board to promulgate rules prohibiting excessive compensation paid
to bank holding company executives, regardless of whether the company is publicly traded or not.
Further, the legislation requires that originators of securitized loans retain a percentage of the
risk for transferred loans, directs the Federal Reserve Board to regulate pricing of certain debit
card interchange fees, and contains a number of reforms related to mortgage loan origination.
It is difficult to predict at this time what effect the new legislation and implementing
regulations will have on community banks with regard to the lending and credit practices of such
banks. Moreover, many of the provisions of the Dodd-Frank Act will not take effect for at least a
year, and the legislation requires various federal agencies to promulgate numerous and extensive
implementing regulations over the next several years. Although the substance and scope of these
regulations cannot be determined at this time, it is expected that the legislation and implementing
regulations, particularly those relating to the new Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, will
increase our operating and compliance costs.
We operate in a highly regulated environment and may be adversely affected by changes in laws and
regulations.
We are subject to extensive regulation, supervision, and examination by the Office of Thrift
Supervision and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. Such regulators govern the activities
in which we may engage, primarily for the protection of depositors. These regulatory authorities
have extensive discretion in connection with their supervisory and enforcement activities,
including the imposition of restrictions on the operations of a bank, the classification of assets
by a bank, and the adequacy of a banks allowance for loan losses. Any change in such regulation
and oversight, whether in the form of regulatory policy, regulations, or legislation, could have a
material impact on our results of operations. Because our business is highly regulated, the laws,
rules, and applicable regulations are subject to regular modification and change. There can be no
assurance that proposed laws, rules, and regulations, or any other laws, rules, or regulations,
will not be adopted in the future, which could make compliance more difficult or expensive or
otherwise adversely affect our business, financial condition, or prospects.
51
|
|
|
ITEM 1B. |
|
Unresolved Staff Comments |
None.
We operate from our main office in Fort Worth, Texas, and from our 14 full-service branches
located in the Dallas/Fort Worth Metroplex and Hood County, Texas. The net book value of our
premises, land and equipment was $47.7 million at December 31, 2010. The following tables set
forth information with respect to our full-service banking offices, including the expiration date
of leases with respect to leased facilities.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Leased or |
|
Year Acquired or |
Address |
|
Owned |
|
Leased |
|
|
|
|
|
Main Office: |
|
|
|
|
1320 South University Dr.
Fort Worth, TX 76107 |
|
Owned |
|
2004 |
|
|
|
|
|
Full Service Branches: |
|
|
|
|
1320 South University Dr.
Fort Worth, TX 76107 |
|
Owned |
|
2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
NAS/JRB FW Building 1870
Fort Worth, TX 76127 |
|
Leased (1) |
|
1968 |
|
|
|
|
|
7800 White Settlement Road
Fort Worth, TX 76108 |
|
Owned |
|
1991 |
|
|
|
|
|
1616 W. Northwest Highway
Grapevine, TX 76051 |
|
Leased (2) |
|
2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
1401 W. Walnut Hill Lane
Irving, TX 75038 |
|
Owned |
|
1990 |
|
|
|
|
|
2311 West Euless Boulevard
Euless, TX 76040 |
|
Owned |
|
1992 |
|
|
|
|
|
950 West Arbrook Boulevard
Arlington, TX 76015 |
|
Owned |
|
1999 |
|
|
|
|
|
1000 Pennsylvania Avenue
Fort Worth, TX 76104 |
|
Owned |
|
1995 |
|
|
|
|
|
6001 Bryant Irvin Road
Fort Worth, TX 76132 |
|
Owned |
|
1996 |
|
|
|
|
|
2330 East Rosedale Street
Fort Worth, TX 76105 |
|
Owned |
|
1996 |
52
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Leased or |
|
Year Acquired or |
Address |
|
Owned |
|
Leased |
|
|
|
|
|
318 South Main
Weatherford, TX 76086 |
|
Owned |
|
2003 |
|
|
|
|
|
8024 Denton Highway
Watauga, TX 76148 |
|
Owned |
|
2002 |
|
|
|
|
|
1030 East Highway 377
Suite 138
Granbury, TX 76048 |
|
Leased (3) |
|
2002 |
|
|
|
|
|
1204 W. Henderson Road
Cleburne, TX 76033 |
|
Owned |
|
2003 |
|
|
|
|
|
2341 Justin Road
Flower Mound, TX 75028 |
|
Leased (4) |
|
2009 |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Lease on a month-to-month basis. |
|
(2) |
|
Lease expires in 2015. |
|
(3) |
|
Lease expires in 2013. |
|
(4) |
|
Lease expires in 2019. |
|
|
|
ITEM 3. |
|
Legal Proceedings |
From time to time, we are involved as plaintiff or defendant in various legal proceedings
arising in the ordinary course of business. At December 31, 2010, we were not involved in any
legal proceedings, the outcome of which would be material to our financial condition or results of
operations.
53
PART II
|
|
|
ITEM 5. |
|
Market for Registrants Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer
Purchases of Equity Securities |
Our common stock is traded on the NASDAQ Global Market under the symbol OABC. The
approximate number of holders of record of OmniAmerican Bancorp, Inc.s common stock as of March 7,
2011 was 823. Certain shares of OmniAmerican Bancorp, Inc. are held in nominee or street name
and accordingly, the number of beneficial owners of such shares is not known or included in the
foregoing number. The following table presents quarterly market information for OmniAmerican
Bancorp, Inc.s common stock for the period beginning January 21, 2010, the date OmniAmerican
Bancorp, Inc. began trading on the NASDAQ Global Market.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends |
|
|
|
High |
|
|
Low |
|
|
Declared |
|
Year Ended December 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fourth Quarter |
|
$ |
13.75 |
|
|
$ |
11.31 |
|
|
|
|
|
Third Quarter |
|
$ |
11.73 |
|
|
$ |
11.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
Second Quarter |
|
$ |
11.95 |
|
|
$ |
11.11 |
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter |
|
$ |
12.35 |
|
|
$ |
10.12 |
|
|
|
|
|
The Board of Directors has the authority to declare cash dividends on shares of common stock,
subject to statutory and regulatory requirements. However, no decision has been made with respect
to the payment of cash dividends. In determining whether and in what amount to pay a cash
dividend, the Board is expected to take into account a number of factors, including capital
requirements, our consolidated financial condition and results of operations, tax considerations,
statutory and regulatory limitations, and general economic conditions. No assurances can be given
that any cash dividends will be paid or that, if paid, will not be reduced or eliminated in the
future.
Dividend payments by OmniAmerican Bancorp, Inc. are dependent primarily on dividends it
receives from OmniAmerican Bank, because OmniAmerican Bancorp, Inc. will have no source of income
other than dividends from OmniAmerican Bank, earnings from the investment of proceeds from the sale
of shares of common stock retained by OmniAmerican Bancorp, Inc., and interest payments with
respect to OmniAmerican Bancorp, Inc.s loan to the Employee Stock Ownership Plan. Federal law
imposes limitations on dividends by federal stock savings banks. See Item 1. Business
Supervision and Regulation Capital Distributions.
At December 31, 2010, there were no compensation plans under which equity securities of
OmniAmerican Bancorp, Inc. were authorized for issuance other than the Employee Stock Ownership
Plan.
The performance graph below compares the cumulative stockholder return on OmniAmerican
Bancorp, Inc. Common Stock between January 21, 2010 and December 31, 2010 with the cumulative total
return on the equity securities of companies included in the Standard &Poors 500 Stock Index and
the SNL Bank and Thrift Index. The graph assumes the initial value of our common stock on January
21, 2010 was the closing sales price of $11.85 per share. The graph is expressed in dollars based
on an assumed investment of $100 on January 21, 2010. The performance graph represents past
performance and should not be considered to be an indication of future performance.
54
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period Ending |
|
|
|
1/21/10 |
|
|
2/28/10 |
|
|
4/30/10 |
|
|
6/30/10 |
|
|
8/31/10 |
|
|
10/31/10 |
|
|
12/31/10 |
|
OmniAmerican Bancorp, Inc. |
|
|
100.00 |
|
|
|
92.07 |
|
|
|
99.41 |
|
|
|
95.27 |
|
|
|
93.84 |
|
|
|
98.82 |
|
|
|
114.35 |
|
S&P 500 |
|
|
100.00 |
|
|
|
99.18 |
|
|
|
106.82 |
|
|
|
93.15 |
|
|
|
95.18 |
|
|
|
107.61 |
|
|
|
114.82 |
|
SNL Bank and Thrift |
|
|
100.00 |
|
|
|
100.94 |
|
|
|
114.27 |
|
|
|
94.75 |
|
|
|
88.83 |
|
|
|
93.47 |
|
|
|
107.00 |
|
During the fourth quarter of 2010, we did not repurchase any shares of our common stock.
55
|
|
|
ITEM 6. |
|
Selected Financial Data |
The summary
information presented below at the dates or for each of the years presented is
derived from OmniAmerican Bancorp, Inc.s audited consolidated financial statements. The following
information is only a summary, and should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial
statements and notes beginning on page 78 of this Annual Report.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Selected Consolidated Financial Condition Data: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
1,108,419 |
|
|
$ |
1,133,927 |
|
|
$ |
1,067,914 |
|
|
$ |
1,051,021 |
|
|
$ |
1,062,874 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
24,597 |
|
|
|
140,144 |
|
|
|
41,242 |
|
|
|
19,036 |
|
|
|
98,317 |
|
Securities available for sale, at fair value |
|
|
317,806 |
|
|
|
210,421 |
|
|
|
230,304 |
|
|
|
244,585 |
|
|
|
150,904 |
|
Other investments |
|
|
3,060 |
|
|
|
3,850 |
|
|
|
10,014 |
|
|
|
10,065 |
|
|
|
9,715 |
|
Loans receivable, net |
|
|
660,425 |
|
|
|
698,127 |
|
|
|
715,774 |
|
|
|
707,099 |
|
|
|
728,847 |
|
Bank-owned life insurance |
|
|
20,078 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreclosed assets, net |
|
|
207 |
|
|
|
267 |
|
|
|
98 |
|
|
|
248 |
|
|
|
143 |
|
Other real estate owned |
|
|
14,793 |
|
|
|
6,762 |
|
|
|
488 |
|
|
|
488 |
|
|
|
488 |
|
Deposits |
|
|
801,158 |
|
|
|
909,966 |
|
|
|
739,846 |
|
|
|
729,895 |
|
|
|
794,152 |
|
Federal Home Loan Bank of Dallas advances |
|
|
41,000 |
|
|
|
66,400 |
|
|
|
169,900 |
|
|
|
156,900 |
|
|
|
128,900 |
|
Other secured borrowings |
|
|
58,000 |
|
|
|
58,000 |
|
|
|
58,664 |
|
|
|
66,156 |
|
|
|
41,168 |
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
198,627 |
|
|
|
91,156 |
|
|
|
89,329 |
|
|
|
88,722 |
|
|
|
88,861 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Selected Consolidated Operating Data: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income |
|
$ |
52,847 |
|
|
$ |
53,715 |
|
|
$ |
57,696 |
|
|
$ |
54,915 |
|
|
$ |
52,010 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
13,903 |
|
|
|
19,674 |
|
|
|
27,677 |
|
|
|
29,688 |
|
|
|
25,521 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income |
|
|
38,944 |
|
|
|
34,041 |
|
|
|
30,019 |
|
|
|
25,227 |
|
|
|
26,489 |
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
6,700 |
|
|
|
5,200 |
|
|
|
3,825 |
|
|
|
3,650 |
|
|
|
6,113 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income after provision for loan losses |
|
|
32,244 |
|
|
|
28,841 |
|
|
|
26,194 |
|
|
|
21,577 |
|
|
|
20,376 |
|
Noninterest income |
|
|
13,699 |
|
|
|
16,463 |
|
|
|
16,269 |
|
|
|
17,569 |
|
|
|
17,325 |
|
Noninterest expense |
|
|
44,001 |
|
|
|
43,757 |
|
|
|
41,077 |
|
|
|
42,433 |
|
|
|
45,957 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income tax expense (benefit) |
|
|
1,942 |
|
|
|
1,547 |
|
|
|
1,386 |
|
|
|
(3,287 |
) |
|
|
(8,256 |
) |
Income tax expense (benefit) (1) |
|
|
285 |
|
|
|
892 |
|
|
|
742 |
|
|
|
(1,115 |
) |
|
|
(7,332 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
1,657 |
|
|
$ |
655 |
|
|
$ |
644 |
|
|
$ |
(2,172 |
) |
|
$ |
(924 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Until its conversion to a federally chartered mutual savings bank on January 1,
2006, OmniAmerican Bank was a credit union, and generally exempt from federal and state
income taxes. As a result of the change in tax status on January 1, 2006, OmniAmerican
Bank recorded a deferred tax asset in the amount of $6.1 million, as well as a related
tax benefit of $4.5 million. The following table provides a reconciliation to pro
forma net income for the year ended December 31, 2006, had OmniAmerican Bank been
subject to federal and state income taxes prior to 2006: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Year Ended |
|
|
|
December 31, 2006 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Historical net loss |
|
$ |
(924 |
) |
Less: tax benefit |
|
|
4,541 |
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma net loss |
|
$ |
(5,465 |
) |
|
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At or For the Years Ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selected Consolidated Financial Ratios and Other Data: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Performance Ratios: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Return (loss) on average assets (ratio of net income
(loss) to average total assets) |
|
|
0.15 |
% |
|
|
0.06 |
% |
|
|
0.06 |
% |
|
|
(0.21 |
)% |
|
|
(0.09 |
)% |
Return (loss) on average equity (ratio of net income
(loss) to average equity) |
|
|
0.86 |
% |
|
|
0.72 |
% |
|
|
0.72 |
% |
|
|
(2.46 |
)% |
|
|
(1.00 |
)% |
Interest rate spread (1) |
|
|
3.45 |
% |
|
|
3.29 |
% |
|
|
2.74 |
% |
|
|
2.38 |
% |
|
|
2.58 |
% |
Net interest margin (2) |
|
|
3.77 |
% |
|
|
3.51 |
% |
|
|
3.02 |
% |
|
|
2.70 |
% |
|
|
2.77 |
% |
Efficiency ratio (3) |
|
|
83.58 |
% |
|
|
86.64 |
% |
|
|
88.74 |
% |
|
|
99.15 |
% |
|
|
104.89 |
% |
Noninterest expense to average total assets |
|
|
3.94 |
% |
|
|
4.18 |
% |
|
|
3.82 |
% |
|
|
4.17 |
% |
|
|
4.38 |
% |
Average interest-earning assets to average
interest-bearing liabilities |
|
|
124.05 |
% |
|
|
111.49 |
% |
|
|
109.88 |
% |
|
|
110.08 |
% |
|
|
107.33 |
% |
Average equity to average total assets |
|
|
17.17 |
% |
|
|
8.73 |
% |
|
|
8.32 |
% |
|
|
8.68 |
% |
|
|
8.84 |
% |
Basic earnings per share (4) |
|
$ |
0.14 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
Diluted earnings per share (4) |
|
$ |
0.14 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset Quality Ratios: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-performing assets to total assets |
|
|
2.19 |
% |
|
|
1.35 |
% |
|
|
0.59 |
% |
|
|
0.35 |
% |
|
|
0.37 |
% |
Non-performing loans to total loans |
|
|
1.38 |
% |
|
|
1.17 |
% |
|
|
0.79 |
% |
|
|
0.42 |
% |
|
|
0.45 |
% |
Allowance for loan losses to non-performing loans |
|
|
96.55 |
% |
|
|
100.66 |
% |
|
|
145.06 |
% |
|
|
248.52 |
% |
|
|
213.67 |
% |
Allowance for loan losses to total loans |
|
|
1.33 |
% |
|
|
1.18 |
% |
|
|
1.14 |
% |
|
|
1.04 |
% |
|
|
0.96 |
% |
Net charge-offs to average loans outstanding |
|
|
0.89 |
% |
|
|
0.71 |
% |
|
|
0.40 |
% |
|
|
0.46 |
% |
|
|
0.52 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Capital Ratios: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total capital (to risk-weighted assets) |
|
|
27.91 |
% |
|
|
12.03 |
% |
|
|
11.73 |
% |
|
|
11.66 |
% |
|
|
11.74 |
% |
Tier I capital (to risk-weighted assets) |
|
|
26.89 |
% |
|
|
11.01 |
% |
|
|
10.73 |
% |
|
|
10.68 |
% |
|
|
10.83 |
% |
Tier I capital (to total assets) |
|
|
17.40 |
% |
|
|
7.35 |
% |
|
|
7.71 |
% |
|
|
7.76 |
% |
|
|
7.95 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Data: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of full service offices |
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
Full-time equivalent employees |
|
|
307 |
|
|
|
330 |
|
|
|
345 |
|
|
|
338 |
|
|
|
387 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The interest rate spread represents the difference between the weighted-average yield on
interest-earning assets and the weighted-average cost of interest-bearing liabilities for the
year. |
|
(2) |
|
The net interest margin represents net interest income as a percent of average
interest-earning assets for the year. |
|
(3) |
|
The efficiency ratio represents noninterest expense divided by the sum of net interest income
and noninterest income. |
|
(4) |
|
Calculated from the effective date of January 20, 2010. |
57
|
|
|
ITEM 7. |
|
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations |
This section is intended to help potential investors understand our financial performance
through a discussion of the factors affecting our financial condition at December 31, 2010 and
2009, and our results of operations for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009, and 2008. This
section should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes to the
consolidated financial statements that appear elsewhere in this annual report. OmniAmerican
Bancorp, Inc. did not exist at December 31, 2009; therefore, the information reflected in this
section related to the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008 reflects the financial performance of
OmniAmerican Bank.
Overview
Our results of operations depend mainly on our net interest income, which is the difference
between the interest income we earn on our loan and investment portfolios and the interest expense
we pay on our deposits and borrowings. Results of operations are also affected by service charges
and other fees, provision for loan losses, commissions, gains (losses) on sales of securities and
loans, and other income. Our noninterest expense consists primarily of salaries and benefits,
software and equipment maintenance, depreciation of furniture, software and equipment, FDIC
insurance, other operations, occupancy, and professional and outside services expenses.
Our results of operations are also significantly affected by general economic and competitive
conditions (such as changes in energy prices which have an impact on the Texas economy), as well as
changes in interest rates, government policies, and actions of regulatory authorities. Future
changes in applicable law, regulations, or government policies may materially affect our financial
condition and results of operations. In recent periods, increases in computer fraud affecting our
operations and the operations of third party providers have increased our costs of doing business.
Prior to our conversion to a federal savings bank in 2006, we operated as a Texas chartered
credit union, concentrating our lending efforts on the origination of consumer loans, primarily the
origination of indirect automobile loans. Since our conversion to a federal savings bank, we have
changed the relative composition of our loan portfolio by emphasizing the origination of one- to
four-family residential real estate loans, commercial business loans, commercial real estate loans,
and real estate construction loans. As a result, between December 31, 2006 and December 31, 2010,
our consumer loans as a percentage of total loans decreased from 59.2% to 29.9%. We have
significantly increased our systems and administration to support the growth of our one- to
four-family residential real estate, commercial real estate, and commercial business lending
activities.
Business Strategy
Our primary objective is to remain an independent, community-oriented financial institution
serving customers in our primary market areas. Our board of directors has sought to accomplish
this objective by adopting a business strategy designed to maintain profitability, a strong capital
position, and high asset quality. This business strategy includes the following elements:
Diversifying our loan portfolio by emphasizing the origination of one- to four-family
residential real estate loans, commercial real estate loans, and commercial business loans. Our
strategy for increasing net income includes increasing our loan originations and diversifying our
loan portfolio. We intend to continue to emphasize the origination and purchase of one- to
four-family residential real estate loans, as well as commercial real estate loans and commercial
business loans, which increased to 40.6%, 13.1%, and 7.3%, respectively, of our total loans at
December 31, 2010, from 22.5%, 10.2%, and 1.6% of our total loans at December 31, 2006. During
58
2008, we
also entered into a number of commercial business loan participations. At December 31, 2010, our commercial business loan
participations totaled $29.3 million. In the future, we intend to focus our commercial business
lending on the origination of small to medium size business loans in our local market area. By
contrast, consumer loans decreased to 29.9% of our total loans at December 31, 2010, compared to
59.2% of our total loans at December 31, 2006. We anticipate the total dollar amount of our
consumer loans to remain stable in the near term. The increase in our one- to four-family
residential real estate loans reflects the demand for these loans in our primary market areas. The
increases in commercial real estate loans and commercial business loans reflect our emphasis on
this type of lending. Commercial real estate loans and commercial business loans generally are
originated with higher interest rates compared to one- to four-family residential real estate loans
and, therefore, have a positive effect on our interest rate spread and net interest income. In
addition, the majority of these loans are originated with adjustable interest rates, which assist
us in managing interest rate risk.
Continuing conservative underwriting guidelines and aggressive monitoring of our loan
portfolio in order to maintain asset quality. We introduce loan products only when we are
confident that our staff has the necessary expertise and that sound underwriting and collection
procedures are in place. For example, a relatively high percentage of our loan portfolio consists
of consumer loans which are generally considered to have higher risk than owner-occupied one- to
four-family residential loans. For the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, our average ratio
of losses from consumer loans to average total loans was 0.26% and 0.37%, respectively. Our credit
and collections department actively monitors the performance of our consumer and residential real
estate loan portfolios. When a loan becomes past due, we promptly contact the borrower by
telephone or by written communication. During each personal contact, the borrower is required to
provide updated information and is counseled on the terms of the loan and the importance of making
payments on or before the due date. With respect to our commercial real estate and commercial
business lending, collection efforts are carried out directly by our commercial loan officers.
Commercial loan officers review past due accounts weekly and promptly contact delinquent borrowers.
Past due notices are typically sent to commercial real estate customers and commercial business
customers at 15 days past due.
Emphasizing lower cost core deposits to reduce the funding costs of our loan growth. We offer
interest-bearing and noninterest-bearing demand accounts, money market accounts, and savings
accounts (collectively referred to as core deposits), which generally are lower-cost sources of
funds than certificates of deposit, and are less sensitive to withdrawal when interest rates
fluctuate. For the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009, 2008, 2007, and 2006, average core
deposits represented 56.96%, 55.34%, 53.71%, 57.23%, and 60.12%, respectively, of average total
deposits. We intend to continue emphasizing our core deposits as a source of funding. In this
regard, we generally require that commercial banking borrowers open checking accounts with us at
the time they establish a borrowing relationship with us.
Managing interest rate risk. As with most financial institutions, successfully managing
interest rate risk is an integral part of our business strategy. Management and the board of
directors evaluate the interest rate risk inherent in our assets and liabilities, and determine the
level of risk that is appropriate and consistent with our capital levels, liquidity, and
performance objectives. In particular, during the current low interest rate environment, we have
sought to minimize the risk of originating long-term fixed rate loans by selling such loans in the
secondary market, and in particular selling to Fannie Mae all qualifying one- to four-family
fixed-rate residential real estate loans with terms in excess of 15 years. In addition, a
significant percentage of our loan portfolio consists of commercial business loans and consumer
loans which generally have shorter terms and provide higher yields than one- to four-family
residential real estate loans. We also monitor the mix of our deposits, a majority of which have
been lower cost core deposits. Our strategy is to continue managing interest rate risk in response
to changes in the local and national economy and to increase our assets as we deploy the proceeds
from the offering.
59
Implementing a controlled growth strategy. We believe our infrastructure, personnel, and
fixed operating base can support a substantially larger institution. We intend to use our capital
to grow organically and we may use a portion of the net proceeds of our initial public offering to
pursue future acquisitions of commercial banks, savings institutions, financial services companies,
and branch offices of such companies, including possible supervisory acquisitions.
The successful implementation of these strategies will allow us to offer our clients a broad
range of financial services and products. Our goal is to have full relationship banking with our
clients.
Critical Accounting Policies
We consider accounting policies that require management to exercise significant judgment or
discretion or make significant assumptions that have, or could have, a material impact on the
carrying value of certain assets or on income, to be critical accounting policies. We consider the
following to be our critical accounting policies.
Allowance for Loan Losses. We believe that the allowance for loan losses and related
provision for loan losses are particularly susceptible to change in the near term, due to changes
in credit quality which are evidenced by trends in charge-offs and in the volume and severity of
past due loans. In addition, our loan mix is changing as we increase our commercial real estate
and commercial business lending. Commercial real estate and commercial business loans generally
have greater credit risk than one- to four-family residential real estate and consumer loans due to
these loans being larger in amount and non-homogenous.
The allowance for loan losses is maintained at a level to cover probable credit losses
inherent in the loan portfolio at the balance sheet date. Based on our estimate of the level of
allowance for loan losses required, we record a provision for loan losses as a charge to earnings
to maintain the allowance for loan losses at an appropriate level. The estimate of our credit
losses is applied to two general categories of loans:
|
|
|
loans that we evaluate individually for impairment pursuant to ASC 310-10,
Receivables, and |
|
|
|
groups of loans with similar risk characteristics that we evaluate collectively for
impairment pursuant to ASC 450-10, Contingencies. |
The allowance for loan losses is evaluated on a regular basis by management and reflects
consideration of all significant factors that affect the collectability of the loan portfolio. The
factors used to evaluate the collectability of the loan portfolio include, but are not limited to,
current economic conditions, our historical loss experience, the nature and volume of the loan
portfolio, the financial strength of the borrower, and estimated value of any underlying
collateral. This evaluation is inherently subjective as it requires estimates that are subject to
significant revision as more information becomes available. Actual loan losses may be
significantly more than the allowance for loan losses we have established which could have a
material negative effect on our financial results. See also Item 1. Business Business of
OmniAmerican Bank Allowance for Loan Losses.
60
Impairment of Investment Securities. The evaluation of the investment portfolio for
other-than-temporary impairment is also a critical accounting policy. In evaluating the investment
portfolio for other-than-temporary impairment, management considers the issuers credit rating,
credit outlook, payment status and financial condition, the length of time the security has been in
a loss position, the size of the loss position and other meaningful information. If a decline in
the fair value of an investment security below its cost is judged to be other-than-temporary, the
cost basis of the investment security is written down to fair value as a new cost basis. The
amount of the credit related impairment write-down is recognized in our earnings and the non-credit
related impairment for securities not expected to be sold is recognized in other comprehensive
income (loss). A number of factors or combinations of factors could cause us to conclude in one or
more future reporting periods that an unrealized loss that exists with respect to these securities
constitutes an impairment that is other than temporary. These factors include failure to make
scheduled principal and/or interest payments, an increase in the severity of the unrealized loss on
a particular security, an increase in the continuous duration of the unrealized loss without an
improvement in value or changes in market conditions, and/or industry or issuer specific factors
that would render us unable to forecast a full recovery in value.
Defined Benefit Retirement Plan. Our costs and obligations related to our defined benefit
pension plan are calculated using various actuarial assumptions and methodologies as prescribed
under ASC Topic 715, Employers Accounting for Pensions. Management evaluates, reviews with the
plan actuaries, and updates, as appropriate, the assumptions used in the determination of the
pension obligation and expense and the fair value of pension assets, including the discount rate
and the expected rate of return on plan assets. The discount rate and the expected rate of return
on plan assets have a significant impact on the actuarially computed present value of future
pension plan benefits that is recorded on the balance sheet as a liability and the corresponding
pension expense. Actual experience that differs from the assumptions could have a significant
effect on our financial position and results of operations.
To compute our pension expense for the year ended December 31, 2010, we used actuarial
assumptions that included a discount rate and an expected long-term rate of return on plan assets.
The discount rate of 6.00%, used in this calculation, is the rate used in computing the benefit
obligation as of December 31, 2010. The expected long-term rate of return on plan assets of 6.50%
is based on the weighted average expected long-term returns for the target allocation of plan
assets as of the measurement date, December 31, 2010, and was developed through analysis of
historical market returns, current market conditions and the pension plan assets past experience.
Although we believe that the assumptions used are appropriate, differences between assumed and
actual experience may affect our operating results. See Note 11 Employee Benefit Plans of the
notes to the consolidated financial statements included in this annual report for additional
information.
Income Taxes. OmniAmerican Bank became a taxable entity after converting from a credit union
to a federally chartered savings bank on January 1, 2006. On that date, we established a net
deferred tax asset of $6.1 million as a result of timing differences for certain items, including
depreciation of premises and equipment, unrealized gains and losses on investment securities, and
bad debt deductions. The calculation of our income tax provision and deferred tax asset is complex
and requires the use of estimates and judgment in their determination. We assess the appropriate
tax treatment of transactions and filing positions after considering statutes, regulations,
judicial precedent and other pertinent information, and we maintain tax accruals consistent with
our evaluation. Changes in the estimate of accrued taxes occur periodically due to changes in tax
rates, interpretations of tax laws, and newly enacted statutory, judicial, and regulatory guidance
that could affect the relative merits of the tax positions. These changes, when they occur, impact
accrued taxes and can materially affect our operating results. In addition, positions we take in
preparing our federal and state tax returns are subject to the review of taxing authorities, and
the review of the positions we have taken by taxing authorities could result in a material
adjustment to our financial statements. On January 1, 2009, we adopted authoritative guidance
under ASC Topic 740, Income Taxes. This authoritative guidance
prescribes a more-likely-than-not recognition threshold and measurement attribute (the largest amount of benefit that
is greater than 50% likely of being realized upon ultimate resolution with tax authorities) for the
financial statement recognition and measurement of an income tax position taken or expected to be
taken in a tax return. See Note 13 Income Taxes of the notes to the consolidated financial
statements included in this annual report for additional information.
61
Comparison of Financial Condition at December 31, 2010 and 2009
Assets. Total assets decreased $25.5 million, or 2.3%, to $1.11 billion at December 31, 2010
from $1.13 billion at December 31, 2009. The decrease was primarily the result of decreases in
cash and cash equivalents of $115.5 million and loans, net of the allowance for loan losses and
deferred fees and discounts of $37.7 million, partially offset by increases in securities
classified as available for sale of $107.4 million and bank-owned life insurance of $20.1 million.
Cash and Cash Equivalents. Total cash and cash equivalents decreased $115.5 million, or
82.4%, to $24.6 million at December 31, 2010 from $140.1 million at December 31, 2009. The
decrease in total cash and cash equivalents was primarily due to $243.5 million in cash used to
purchase securities classified as available for sale, $240.3 million in cash used to originate and
purchase loans, $25.4 million in cash used to repay Federal Home Loan Bank advances, and $20.0
million in cash used to purchase bank-owned life insurance. These decreases were partially offset
by increases due to $210.6 million in cash received from loan principal repayments, $130.3 million
of proceeds from sales, principal repayments, and maturities of securities and $58.2 million of
proceeds from the sales of loans, consisting of longer term (greater than 15 years) one- to
four-family residential real estate loans and commercial business loans, during the year ended
December 31, 2010.
Securities. Securities classified as available for sale increased $107.4 million, or 51.0%,
to $317.8 million at December 31, 2010 from $210.4 million at December 31, 2009. The increase in
securities classified as available for sale during the year ended December 31, 2010, reflected
purchases of $243.5 million during the year ended December 31, 2010 as we invested the proceeds of
the initial public stock offering and cash generated from operations in securities classified as
available for sale. Partially offsetting the increase due to purchases were decreases due to
principal repayments, maturities, and calls of $110.2 million and sales of $20.1 million. The
proceeds from the sales of securities classified as available for sale were used to purchase
bank-owned life insurance. At December 31, 2010, securities classified as available for sale
consisted primarily of government-sponsored mortgage-backed securities, government-sponsored and
private-label collateralized mortgage obligations, trust preferred securities, and other equity
securities.
Loans. Loans, net decreased $37.7 million, or 5.4%, to $660.4 million at December 31, 2010
from $698.1 million at December 31, 2009. The decrease included a reclassification of 22 loans,
consisting of four commercial real estate loans with balances totaling $7.7 million, 16
single-family residential real estate loans with balances totaling $3.3 million and two home equity
loans with balances totaling $141,000 to other real estate owned during the year ended December 31,
2010. Automobile loans (consisting of direct and indirect loans) decreased $24.3 million, or
11.8%, to $181.2 million at December 31, 2010 as weakened economic conditions have reduced the
demand for automobile loans. Commercial real estate loans decreased $13.1 million, or 13.0%, to
$87.9 million, primarily due to the economic downturn in our market area and the
reclassification of $7.7 million of commercial real estate loans to other real estate owned.
Commercial business loans decreased $10.6 million, or 17.9%, to $48.7 million at December 31, 2010.
The decrease in commercial business loans was primarily attributable to a $12.0 million decrease
in participation interests in Shared National Credits, to $4.7 million at December 31, 2010 from
$16.7 million at December 31, 2009 reflecting the Companys efforts to reduce its exposure to
Shared National Credits and to focus our commercial business lending on small- to-medium size
businesses in our local market area. Real estate construction loans decreased $2.3 million,
or 6.4%, to $34.5 million at December 31, 2010, as weakened economic conditions and the
excess of existing home inventories have reduced the demand for new construction. One- to
four-family residential real estate loans increased $14.5 million, or 5.6%, to $271.8 million at
December 31, 2010 from $257.3 million at December 31, 2009, as $126.2 million in originations and
purchases of one- to four-family residential real estate loans were partially offset by sales of
$53.7 million, repayments of $54.5 million, and a $3.3 million reclassification to other real
estate owned.
62
Allowance for Loan Losses. The allowance for loan losses increased $604,000, or 7.3%, to $8.9
million at December 31, 2010 from $8.3 million at December 31, 2009, while total loans decreased
$38.3 million, or 5.4%, to $669.5 million at December 31, 2010 from $707.8 million at December 31,
2009. The increase in the allowance for loan losses attributable to commercial business loans was
partially offset by a decrease in the allowance for loan losses related to commercial real estate
loans. At December 31, 2010, the allowance for loan losses represented 1.33% of total loans
compared to 1.18% of total loans at December 31, 2009. Included in the allowance for loan losses
at December 31, 2010 were specific allowances for loan losses of $2.3 million related to eight
impaired loans with balances totaling $15.6 million. Impaired loans with balances totaling $17.7
million did not require specific allowances for loan losses at December 31, 2010. The allowance
for loan losses at December 31, 2009 included specific allowance for loan losses of $687,000
related to five impaired loans with balances totaling $6.6 million. In addition, impaired loans
with balances totaling $11.8 million did not require specific allowances for loan losses at
December 31, 2009. The balance of unimpaired loans decreased $53.2 million, or 7.7%, to $636.2
million at December 31, 2010 from $689.4 million at December 31, 2009. The allowance for loan
losses related to unimpaired loans decreased $1.0 million, or 13.2%, to $6.6 million at December
31, 2010 from $7.6 million at December 31, 2009.
The significant changes in the amount of the allowance for loan losses during the year ended
December 31, 2010 related to: (i) a $1.6 million increase in the allowance for loan losses
attributable to commercial business loans resulting primarily from the establishment of $1.5
million of specific allowance for loan losses related to five impaired commercial business loans
with balances totaling $2.0 million; and (ii) a $589,000 decrease in the allowance for loan losses
attributable to commercial real estate loans primarily due to the foreclosure in 2010 of an
impaired loan with a specific allowance for loan losses of $377,000 at December 31, 2009 and a
$212,000 reduction in the general allowance for loan losses on unimpaired commercial real estate
loans reflecting a decrease of $13.0 million, or 14.2%, in the total outstanding balance of
unimpaired commercial real estate loans to $78.6 million at December 31, 2010 from $91.6 million at
December 31, 2009. Management also considered local economic factors and unemployment as well as
the higher risk profile of commercial business and commercial real estate loans when evaluating the
adequacy of the allowance for loan losses as it pertains to these types of loans.
Bank-Owned Life Insurance. During 2010, we purchased $20.0 million of life insurance policies
on certain key employees to help offset costs associated with the Companys compensation and
benefit programs and to generate competitive investment yields. The policy premiums were invested
in an insurance carrier which had a rating of A+ by Standard & Poors.
Deposits. Deposits decreased $108.8 million, or 12.0%, to $801.2 million at December 31, 2009
from $910.0 million at December 31, 2009. Our core deposits (consisting of interest-bearing and
non-interest-bearing demand accounts, money market accounts and savings accounts) decreased $118.0
million, or 20.5%, to $458.2 million at December 31, 2010 from $576.2 million at December 31, 2009
primarily due to the effects of our initial public stock offering. The core deposit balance at
December 31, 2009 included $159.5 million in subscriptions for the purchase of shares of common
stock in our initial public stock offering, which was completed on January 20, 2010. Certificates
of deposit increased $9.2 million, or 2.8%, to $343.0 million at December 31, 2010 from $333.8
million at December 31, 2009.
63
Borrowings. Federal Home Loan Bank advances decreased $25.4 million, or 38.3%, to $41.0
million at December 31, 2010 from $66.4 million at December 31, 2009. The decline was the result
of scheduled maturities in 2010 and was funded with available liquidity. Securities sold under
agreements to repurchase were unchanged at $58.0 million at December 31, 2010 and December 31,
2009.
Stockholders Equity. At December 31, 2010, our stockholders equity was $198.6 million, an
increase of $107.4 million, or 117.8%, from $91.2 million at December 31, 2009. The increase
resulted from the receipt of net proceeds totaling $106.0 million following the completion of our
initial public stock offering on January 20, 2010 and net income of $1.7 million for the year ended
December 31, 2010. Accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income decreased $634,000, to a loss of
$33,000 at December 31, 2010 from income of $601,000 at December 31, 2009.
Comparison of Operating Results for the Years Ended December 31, 2010 and 2009
General. Net income increased $1.0 million, or 152.7%, to $1.7 million for the year ended
December 31, 2010 from $655,000 for the year ended December 31, 2009. The increase in net income
for the year ended December 31, 2010 reflected an increase in net interest income of $4.9 million
and a decrease in income tax expense of $607,000, partially offset by a decrease in noninterest
income of $2.8 million, and increases in the provision for loan losses of $1.5 million, and
noninterest expense of $244,000.
Interest Income. Interest income decreased $868,000, or 1.6%, to $52.8 million for the year
ended December 31, 2010 from $53.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2009. The decrease
resulted from a decrease of 43 basis points in our average yield on interest-earning assets to
5.12% for the year ended December 31, 2010 from 5.55% for the year ended December 31, 2009. The
decrease in our average yield on interest-earning assets during the year ended December 31, 2010 as
compared to the prior year period was due to the continuing low short-term market interest rate
environment. Partially offsetting the decrease in the average yield on interest-earning assets was
a $63.2 million, or 6.5%, increase in the average balance of interest-earning assets to $1.03
billion for the year ended December 31, 2010 from $968.6 million for the year ended December 31,
2009.
Interest income on loans decreased $2.4 million, or 5.4%, to $42.3 million for the year ended
December 31, 2010 from $44.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2009. The decrease resulted
primarily from a decrease in the average balance of loans of $35.8 million, or 5.0%, to $686.3
million for the year ended December 31, 2010 from $722.1 million for the year ended December 31,
2009. In addition, the average yield on our loan portfolio decreased by two basis points to 6.17%
for the year ended December 31, 2010 from 6.19% for the year ended December 31, 2009.
Interest income on investment securities increased $1.5 million, or 16.7%, to $10.5 million
for the year ended December 31, 2010 from $9.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2009. The
increase resulted primarily from a $116.2 million, or 57.4%, increase in the average balance of our
securities portfolio to $318.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2010 from $202.4 million for
the year ended December 31, 2009, due to increased purchases of securities, primarily U.S.
government sponsored collateralized mortgage obligations. Partially offsetting the increase in the
average balance of our securities portfolio was a decrease in the average yield on our securities
portfolio (excluding nontaxable investment securities) of 113 basis points to 3.30% for the year
ended December 31, 2010 from 4.43% for the year ended December 31, 2009.
64
Interest Expense. Interest expense decreased by $5.8 million, or 29.4%, to $13.9 million for
the year ended December 31, 2010 from $19.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2009. The
decrease
resulted primarily from a $3.3 decrease in interest expense on deposits million and a $2.4
million decrease in interest expense on borrowed funds. The average rate we paid on deposits
decreased 53 basis points to 1.31% for the year ended December 31, 2010 from 1.84% for the year
ended December 31, 2009, as we were able to reprice our deposits lower as market interest rates
declined. Partially offsetting the decrease in expense due to the decrease in the rates we paid on
deposits was a $26.3 million, or 3.8%, increase in the average balance of interest-bearing deposits
to $719.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2010 from $693.3 million for the year ended
December 31, 2009. The increase in the average balance of our interest-bearing deposits was
primarily due to an increase in the average balance of our interest-bearing core deposits
(consisting of interest-bearing demand accounts, money market accounts, and savings accounts).
Management believes that the increase in our core deposits resulted from increases in personal
savings rates and many consumers continuing to invest in FDIC-insured deposits as the economy
begins to recover from the recession.
Interest expense on certificates of deposit decreased $2.9 million, or 28.4%, to $7.3 million
for the year ended December 31, 2010 from $10.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2009. The
average rate paid on certificates of deposit decreased 85 basis points to 2.12% for the year ended
December 31, 2010 from 2.97% for the year ended December 31, 2009, reflecting lower market interest
rates. Partially offsetting the decrease in interest expense was a $2.1 million, or 0.6%, increase
in the average balance of certificates of deposit to $344.7 million for the year ended December 31,
2010 from $342.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2009. Interest expense on our core
deposits decreased $450,000, or 17.3%, to $2.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2010 from
$2.6 million for the prior year, primarily due to a 17 basis point decrease in the average rate
paid on core deposits reflecting lower market interest rates, partially offset by a $24.2 million
increase in the average balance of core deposits.
Interest expense on borrowed funds decreased $2.4 million, or 34.8%, to $4.5 million for the
year ended December 31, 2010 from $6.9 million for the prior year as the average balance of Federal
Home Loan Bank advances were reduced. Partially offsetting the decrease in the average balances of
borrowed funds was an increase in the average rate paid for borrowed funds of five basis points to
3.98% for the year ended December 31, 2010 from 3.93% for the year ended December 31, 2009,
reflecting an increase in the borrowing rate of a repurchase agreement.
Net Interest Income. Net interest income increased by $4.9 million, or 14.4%, to $38.9
million for the year ended December 31, 2010 from $34.0 million for the year ended December 31,
2009. The increase in net interest income resulted from a 16 basis point improvement in our
interest rate spread to 3.45% for the year ended December 31, 2010 from 3.29% for the year ended
December 31, 2009. Our net interest margin increased 26 basis points to 3.77% for the year ended
December 31, 2010 from 3.51% for the year ended December 31, 2009. The increase in our interest
rate spread and net interest margin reflected the sloping yield curve as short-term market interest
rates used to price our deposits have continued to decline in 2010, while we had significant growth
in the average balance of our interest-earning assets, such as investment securities, which
generally are priced based on medium and longer-term interest rates.
Provision for Loan Losses. We recorded a provision for loan losses of $6.7 million for the
year ended December 31, 2010 compared to a provision for loan losses of $5.2 million for the year
ended December 31, 2009. The increase in the provision is primarily due to a $3.7 million, or
9.2%, increase in loans classified as substandard, to $44.0 million at December 31, 2010 from $40.3
million at December 31, 2009, and a $1.0 million, or 19.2%, increase in net charge-offs to $6.1
million for the year ended December 31, 2010 from $5.1 for the year ended December 31, 2009. At
December 31, 2010, we identified 167 impaired loans with balances totaling $33.3 million. Eight of
these impaired loans with balances totaling $15.6 million had specific allowance for loan losses
totaling $2.3 million. Included in the substandard loan total at December 31, 2009 were 146
impaired loans with balances totaling $18.4 million. Five of these impaired loans with balances
totaling $6.6 million had a specific allowance for
loan losses of $687,000. In addition, 22 loans with balances totaling $11.1 million were
reclassified to other real estate owned during the year ended December 31, 2010. Net charge-offs
as a percentage of average loans outstanding increased to 0.89% for the year ended December 31,
2010 from 0.71% for the year ended December 31, 2009. The allowance for loan losses to total loans
receivable increased to 1.33% at December 31, 2010 from 1.18% at December 31, 2009.
65
Non-performing loans include loans on non-accrual status or loans delinquent 90 days or
greater and still accruing interest. None of our loans were delinquent 90 days or greater and
still accruing interest at either December 31, 2010 or December 31, 2009. At December 31, 2010,
non-performing loans totaled $9.3 million, or 1.38% of total loans, compared to $8.3 million, or
1.17% of total loans, at December 31, 2009. The allowance for loan losses as a percentage of
non-performing loans decreased to 96.55% at December 31, 2010 from 100.66% at December 31, 2009.
To the best of our knowledge, we have provided for all losses that are both probable and reasonable
to estimate at December 31, 2010 and 2009.
Noninterest Income. Noninterest income decreased $2.8 million, or 17.0%, to $13.7 million for
the year ended December 31, 2010 from $16.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2009. The
decrease was primarily attributable to a $2.1 million decrease in net gains on the sales and calls
of securities available for sale, consisting of mortgage-backed securities and agency bonds, a
$426,000 decrease in service charges and other fees due to a significant decrease in insufficient
funds and overdraft fees, and a $218,000 decrease in net gains on the sale of loans, primarily one-
to four-family residential real estate loans.
Noninterest Expense. Noninterest expense increased $244,000, or 0.6%, to $44.0 million for
the year ended December 31, 2010 from $43.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2009. The
increase was primarily attributable to increases in real estate owned expense of $827,000,
professional and outside services of $811,000, and marketing expense of $319,000, partially offset
by decreases in the FDIC insurance assessment of $553,000, depreciation expense on furniture,
software and equipment of $525,000, occupancy expense of $261,000 and service fees expense of
$237,000. The increase in real estate owned expense was due primarily to increases in property
tax, repairs and maintenance, and other expenses related to other real estate owed. The increase
in professional and outside services can be primarily attributed to additional accounting, legal
and consulting expenses to meet the reporting and compliance requirements of being a publicly
traded company. The increase in marketing expense was due primarily to a debit card rewards
program offered to customers. The decrease in the FDIC insurance assessment was primarily
attributable to a $478,000 special assessment incurred in the prior year period and a decrease in
the general assessment rate for the year ended December 31, 2010. The decrease in depreciation
expense on furniture, software and equipment for the year ended December 31, 2010 compared to the
year ended December 31, 2009 was primarily attributable to assets fully depreciated at December 31,
2009. The decrease in occupancy expense was due primarily to a reduction in property tax after
property values were reduced for certain administrative office and branch locations. The decrease
in service fees expense was primarily due to our conversion to in-house item processing from
outsourcing item processing in the prior year.
Income Tax Expense. Income tax expense was $285,000 for the year ended December 31, 2010
compared to $892,000 for the prior year. Our effective tax rate, including provisions for the
Texas state margin tax was 14.7% for the year ended December 31, 2010 compared to 57.7% for the
year ended December 31, 2009. The decrease in the effective tax rate is primarily attributable to
a $1.1 million decrease in the Texas state margin tax, to a credit of $570,000 for 2010 from
expense of $553,000 for 2009. A change in the application of the state tax law as it relates to
the calculation of in-state taxable margin resulted in an overstatement of margin tax expense in
the years ended December 31, 2007, 2008 and 2009.
66
Comparison of Operating Results for the Years Ended December 31, 2009 and 2008
General. Net income increased $11,000, or 1.7%, to $655,000 for the year ended December 31,
2009 from $644,000 for the prior year. The increase in net income for the year ended December 31,
2009 reflected increases in net interest income of $4.0 million and noninterest income of $194,000,
partially offset by increases in noninterest expense of $2.7 million, the provision for loan losses
of $1.4 million and income tax expense of $150,000.
Interest Income. Interest income decreased $4.0 million, or 6.9%, to $53.7 million for the
year ended December 31, 2009 from $57.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2008. The decrease
resulted from a $26.4 million, or 2.7%, decrease in the average balance of interest-earning assets
to $968.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2009 from $995.0 million for the year ended
December 31, 2008. In addition, the average yield on interest-earning assets decreased by 25 basis
points to 5.55% for the year ended December 31, 2009 from 5.80% for the year ended December 31,
2008. The decrease in our average yield on interest-earning assets during the year ended December
31, 2009 as compared to the prior year was due primarily to the general decline in short-term
market interest rates.
Interest income on loans decreased $409,000, or 0.9%, to $44.7 million for the year ended
December 31, 2009 from $45.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2008. The decrease resulted
primarily from a decrease in the average balance of loans of $9.9 million, or 1.4%, to $722.1
million for the year ended December 31, 2009 from $732.0 million for the year ended December 31,
2008. Partially offsetting the decrease in average balance of loans was an increase in the average
yield on our loan portfolio of three basis points, to 6.19% for the year ended December 31, 2009
from 6.16% for the year ended December 31, 2008. During this period, we continued to change the
composition of our loan portfolio to include a higher percentage of loans secured by real estate
and a lower percentage of consumer loans.
Interest income on investment securities decreased $3.6 million, or 28.6%, to $9.0 million for
the year ended December 31, 2009 from $12.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2008. The
decrease resulted primarily from a $40.7 million, or 16.7%, decrease in the average balance of our
securities portfolio to $202.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2009 from $243.1 million for
the year ended December 31, 2008, due to increased sales of our securities, primarily
mortgage-backed securities. The average yield on our securities portfolio (excluding nontaxable
investment securities) decreased by 54 basis points to 4.43% for the year ended December 31, 2009
from 4.97% for the year ended December 31, 2008.
Interest Expense. Interest expense decreased by $8.0 million, or 28.9%, to $19.7 million for
the year ended December 31, 2009 from $27.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2008. The
decrease resulted primarily from a decrease in interest expense on deposits of $5.3 million and, to
a lesser extent, by a $2.7 million decrease in interest expense on borrowed funds. The average
rate we paid on deposits decreased 85 basis points to 1.84% for the year ended December 31, 2009
from 2.69% for the year ended December 31, 2008, as we were able to reprice our deposits lower as
market interest rates declined. Partially offsetting the decrease in expense due to the decrease
in the rates we paid on deposits was a $21.3 million, or 3.2%, increase in the average balance of
interest-bearing deposits to $693.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2009 from $672.0
million for the year ended December 31, 2008. The increase in the average balance of our
interest-bearing deposits was primarily due to an increase in the average balance of our
interest-bearing core deposits (consisting of interest-bearing demand accounts, money market
accounts and savings accounts). Management believes that the increase in our core deposits
resulted from many consumers investing in FDIC-insured deposits during the current recession.
67
Interest expense on certificates of deposit decreased $3.8 million, or 27.1%, to $10.2 million
for the year ended December 31, 2009 from $14.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2008. The
average rate paid on certificates of deposit decreased 112 basis points to 2.97% for the year ended
December 31, 2009 from 4.09% for the year ended December 31, 2008, reflecting lower market interest
rates. Partially offsetting the decrease in interest expense was a $274,000, or 0.1%, increase in
the average balance of certificates of deposit to $342.6 million for the year ended December 31,
2009 from $342.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2008. Interest expense on our core
deposits decreased $1.5 million, or 36.6%, to $2.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2009
from $4.1 million for the prior year reflecting lower market interest rates.
Interest expense on borrowed funds decreased $2.7 million, or 28.1%, to $6.9 million for the
year ended December 31, 2009 from $9.6 million for the prior year as the average balance of Federal
Home Loan Bank advances and securities sold under agreements to repurchase were reduced.
Net Interest Income. Net interest income increased by $4.0 million, or 13.3%, to $34.0
million for the year ended December 31, 2009 from $30.0 million for the year ended December 31,
2008. The improvement in net interest income resulted from a 55 basis point improvement in our
interest rate spread to 3.29% for the year ended December 31, 2009 from 2.74% for the year ended
December 31, 2008. Our net interest margin increased 49 basis points to 3.51% for the year ended
December 31, 2009 from 3.02% for the year ended December 31, 2008. The increase in our interest
rate spread and net interest margin reflected the steepening yield curve as short-term market
interest rates used to price our deposits continued to decline in 2009.
Provision for Loan Losses. We recorded a provision for loan losses of $5.2 million for the
year ended December 31, 2009 compared to a provision for loan losses of $3.8 million for the year
ended December 31, 2008. The primary reasons for the increase in the provision for loan losses
were a $18.9 million increase in loans classified as substandard and a $2.2 million increase in net
charge-offs to $5.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2009 from $2.9 million for the year
ended December 31, 2008. Substandard loans increased to $40.3 million at December 31, 2009 from
$21.4 million at December 31, 2008. Included in the December 31, 2009 substandard loan total were
impaired loans totaling $18.4 million, with a specific allowance for loan losses of $687,000, while
two loans with balances totaling $7.5 million and specific allowances of $683,000 were considered
to be impaired at December 31, 2008. In addition, six loans with balances totaling $9.2 million
were reclassified to other real estate owned during the year ended December 31, 2009. Net
charge-offs increased to 0.71% of average loans outstanding for the year ended December 31, 2009
from 0.40% for the year ended December 31, 2008. The allowance for loan losses to total loans
receivable increased to 1.18% at December 31, 2009 from 1.14% at December 31, 2008.
At December 31, 2009, non-performing loans totaled $8.3 million, or 1.17% of total loans, as
compared to $5.7 million, or 0.79% of total loans, at December 31, 2008. The allowance for loan
losses as a percentage of non-performing loans decreased to 100.66% at December 31, 2009 from
145.06% at December 31, 2008. To the best of our knowledge, we have provided for all losses that
are both probable and reasonable to estimate at December 31, 2009 and 2008.
Noninterest Income. Noninterest income increased $194,000, or 1.2%, to $16.5 million for the
year ended December 31, 2009 from $16.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2008. The increase
was primarily attributable to a $2.4 million increase in net gains on the sale of securities
available for sale, consisting of mortgage-backed securities, and an increase of $330,000 in net
gains on the sale of loans, primarily one- to four-family residential real estate loans. These
gains were offset in part by a decrease in service charges and other fees of $1.9 million due to a
significant decrease in insufficient funds and overdraft fees income and a decline in other
noninterest income due primarily to a $416,000 one-time
payment from VISA in 2008. The one-time payment was related to VISAs redemption of a portion
of its Class B shares outstanding in connection with its initial public offering that occurred in
March 2008.
68
Noninterest Expense. Noninterest expense increased $2.7 million, or 6.6%, to $43.8 million
for the year ended December 31, 2009 from $41.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2008. The
increase was primarily attributable to a $1.8 million increase in salaries and benefits expense, a
$1.3 million increase in the FDIC insurance assessment, a $796,000 increase in software and
equipment maintenance expense, partially offset by a $1.1 million decrease in professional and
outside services expense and a $722,000 decrease in other operations expense. The increase in
salaries and benefits was due primarily to the $1.3 million reversal in 2008 of a salary
continuation plan liability for our former Chief Executive Officer which was recorded in 2006 and
extinguished in 2008. The increase in the FDIC insurance assessment for the year ended December
31, 2009 compared to the year ended December 31, 2008 was primarily a $478,000 special assessment
and increases in the general assessment rate and deposits upon which the assessment is based. The
increase in software and equipment maintenance expense related to expenditures incurred to enhance
our network security. Professional and outside services expense decreased for the year ended
December 31, 2009 compared to the prior year due primarily to $537,000 of previously capitalized
initial public offering expenses relating to our terminated initial public offering in late 2007
which were charged to earnings during the year ended December 31, 2008. The decrease in other
operations expense was due to higher expenses in the year ended December 31, 2008 due to $784,000
in costs related to the breach in our network security that occurred in early 2008, net of a
$227,000 reimbursement received from our insurance carrier, partially offset by $335,000 of costs
in 2009 resulting from the Heartland Payment Systems security breach. Heartland Payment Systems
expenses consisted of fees imposed on us by VISA to process merchant reimbursements for our
customers, the cost of reissuing debit cards to our customers and the expense of the insurance
deductible.
Income Tax Expense. Income tax expense was $892,000 for the year ended December 31, 2009
compared to $742,000 for the same period in 2008, primarily due to a $144,000 increase in the Texas
state margin tax, to $553,000 for 2009 from $409,000 for 2008. Our effective tax rate, including
provisions for the Texas state margin tax was 57.7% for the year ended December 31, 2009 compared
to 53.5% for the year ended December 31, 2008.
69
Average Balances and Yields
The following table sets forth average balance sheets, average yields and costs, and certain
other information at or for the years indicated. All average balances are daily average balances.
Non-accrual loans were included in the computation of average balances, but have been reflected in
the table as loans carrying a zero yield. The yields set forth below include the effect of
deferred fees, discounts and premiums that are amortized or accreted to interest income or expense.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yield/ |
|
|
Outstanding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yield/ |
|
|
Outstanding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yield/ |
|
|
|
Balance |
|
|
Interest |
|
|
Rate |
|
|
Balance |
|
|
Interest |
|
|
Rate |
|
|
Balance |
|
|
Interest |
|
|
Rate |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-earning assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans |
|
$ |
686,341 |
|
|
$ |
42,330 |
|
|
|
6.17 |
% |
|
$ |
722,143 |
|
|
$ |
44,702 |
|
|
|
6.19 |
% |
|
$ |
731,999 |
|
|
$ |
45,111 |
|
|
|
6.16 |
% |
Taxable investment securities available for
sale |
|
|
315,551 |
|
|
|
10,398 |
|
|
|
3.30 |
|
|
|
197,331 |
|
|
|
8,737 |
|
|
|
4.43 |
|
|
|
242,551 |
|
|
|
12,061 |
|
|
|
4.97 |
|
Nontaxable investment securities available
for sale |
|
|
3,093 |
|
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
1.00 |
(1) |
|
|
5,112 |
|
|
|
111 |
|
|
|
2.17 |
(1) |
|
|
520 |
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
4.42 |
(1) |
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
23,220 |
|
|
|
66 |
|
|
|
0.28 |
|
|
|
37,581 |
|
|
|
66 |
|
|
|
0.18 |
|
|
|
9,359 |
|
|
|
199 |
|
|
|
2.13 |
|
Other |
|
|
3,590 |
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
0.61 |
|
|
|
6,456 |
|
|
|
99 |
|
|
|
1.53 |
|
|
|
10,525 |
|
|
|
302 |
|
|
|
2.87 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest-earning assets |
|
|
1,031,795 |
|
|
|
52,847 |
|
|
|
5.12 |
|
|
|
968,623 |
|
|
|
53,715 |
|
|
|
5.55 |
|
|
|
994,954 |
|
|
|
57,696 |
|
|
|
5.80 |
|
Noninterest-earning assets |
|
|
85,850 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
78,690 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
79,384 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
1,117,645 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,047,313 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,074,338 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-bearing liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-bearing demand |
|
$ |
74,069 |
|
|
$ |
265 |
|
|
|
0.36 |
% |
|
$ |
66,250 |
|
|
$ |
268 |
|
|
|
0.40 |
% |
|
$ |
62,176 |
|
|
$ |
367 |
|
|
|
0.59 |
% |
Savings accounts |
|
|
206,873 |
|
|
|
1,032 |
|
|
|
0.50 |
|
|
|
197,394 |
|
|
|
1,344 |
|
|
|
0.68 |
|
|
|
189,523 |
|
|
|
2,119 |
|
|
|
1.12 |
|
Money market accounts |
|
|
93,952 |
|
|
|
836 |
|
|
|
0.89 |
|
|
|
87,032 |
|
|
|
970 |
|
|
|
1.11 |
|
|
|
77,971 |
|
|
|
1,608 |
|
|
|
2.06 |
|
Certificates of deposit |
|
|
344,680 |
|
|
|
7,302 |
|
|
|
2.12 |
|
|
|
342,589 |
|
|
|
10,189 |
|
|
|
2.97 |
|
|
|
342,315 |
|
|
|
14,011 |
|
|
|
4.09 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest-bearing deposits |
|
|
719,574 |
|
|
|
9,435 |
|
|
|
1.31 |
|
|
|
693,265 |
|
|
|
12,771 |
|
|
|
1.84 |
|
|
|
671,985 |
|
|
|
18,105 |
|
|
|
2.69 |
|
Federal Home Loan Bank advances |
|
|
54,009 |
|
|
|
2,010 |
|
|
|
3.72 |
|
|
|
117,547 |
|
|
|
4,763 |
|
|
|
4.05 |
|
|
|
169,026 |
|
|
|
7,123 |
|
|
|
4.21 |
|
Other secured borrowings |
|
|
58,195 |
|
|
|
2,458 |
|
|
|
4.22 |
|
|
|
58,000 |
|
|
|
2,140 |
|
|
|
3.69 |
|
|
|
64,497 |
|
|
|
2,449 |
|
|
|
3.80 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest-bearing liabilities |
|
|
831,778 |
|
|
|
13,903 |
|
|
|
1.67 |
|
|
|
868,812 |
|
|
|
19,674 |
|
|
|
2.26 |
|
|
|
905,508 |
|
|
|
27,677 |
|
|
|
3.06 |
|
Noninterest-bearing liabilities(2) |
|
|
94,002 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
87,115 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
79,449 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
925,780 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
955,927 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
984,957 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity |
|
|
191,865 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
91,386 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
89,381 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and equity |
|
$ |
1,117,645 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,047,313 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,074,338 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
38,944 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
34,041 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
30,019 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate spread (3) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.45 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.29 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.74 |
% |
Net interest-earning assets (4) |
|
$ |
200,017 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
99,811 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
89,446 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest margin (5) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.77 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.51 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.02 |
% |
Average interest-earning assets to
interest-bearing liabilities |
|
|
124.05 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
111.49 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
109.88 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The tax equivalent yield of nontaxable investment securities was 1.52%, 3.29%, and 6.70%
for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009, and 2008, respectively, assuming a marginal tax
rate of 34%. |
|
(2) |
|
Includes noninterest-bearing deposits. |
|
(3) |
|
Interest rate spread represents the difference between the yield on average interest-earning
assets and the cost of average interest-bearing liabilities. |
|
(4) |
|
Net interest-earning assets represent total interest-earning assets less total
interest-bearing liabilities. |
|
(5) |
|
Net interest margin represents net interest income divided by average total interest-earning
assets. |
70
Rate/Volume Analysis
The following table presents the effects of changing rates and volumes on our net interest
income for the years indicated. The rate column shows the effects attributable to changes in rate
(changes in rate multiplied by prior volume). The volume column shows the effects attributable to
changes in volume (changes in volume multiplied by prior rate). The net column represents the sum
of the prior columns. For purposes of this table, changes attributable to both rate and volume,
which cannot be segregated, have been allocated proportionately, based on the changes due to rate
and the changes due to volume.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31, |
|
|
Years Ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 vs. 2009 |
|
|
2009 vs. 2008 |
|
|
|
Increase (Decrease) |
|
|
Total |
|
|
Increase (Decrease) |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
Due to |
|
|
Increase |
|
|
Due to |
|
|
Increase |
|
|
|
Volume |
|
|
Rate |
|
|
(Decrease) |
|
|
Volume |
|
|
Rate |
|
|
(Decrease) |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-earning assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans |
|
$ |
(2,216 |
) |
|
$ |
(156 |
) |
|
$ |
(2,372 |
) |
|
$ |
(607 |
) |
|
$ |
198 |
|
|
$ |
(409 |
) |
Taxable investment securities available for sale |
|
|
5,234 |
|
|
|
(3,573 |
) |
|
|
1,661 |
|
|
|
(2,249 |
) |
|
|
(1,075 |
) |
|
|
(3,324 |
) |
Nontaxable investment securities available for sale |
|
|
(44 |
) |
|
|
(36 |
) |
|
|
(80 |
) |
|
|
203 |
|
|
|
(115 |
) |
|
|
88 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
(25 |
) |
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
600 |
|
|
|
(733 |
) |
|
|
(133 |
) |
Other |
|
|
(44 |
) |
|
|
(33 |
) |
|
|
(77 |
) |
|
|
(116 |
) |
|
|
(87 |
) |
|
|
(203 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest-earning assets |
|
$ |
2,905 |
|
|
$ |
(3,773 |
) |
|
$ |
(868 |
) |
|
$ |
(2,169 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,812 |
) |
|
$ |
(3,981 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-bearing liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-bearing demand |
|
$ |
32 |
|
|
$ |
(35 |
) |
|
$ |
(3 |
) |
|
$ |
24 |
|
|
$ |
(123 |
) |
|
$ |
(98 |
) |
Savings accounts |
|
|
65 |
|
|
|
(377 |
) |
|
|
(312 |
) |
|
|
88 |
|
|
|
(863 |
) |
|
|
(775 |
) |
Money market accounts |
|
|
77 |
|
|
|
(211 |
) |
|
|
(134 |
) |
|
|
187 |
|
|
|
(825 |
) |
|
|
(638 |
) |
Certificates of deposit |
|
|
62 |
|
|
|
(2,949 |
) |
|
|
(2,887 |
) |
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
(3,833 |
) |
|
|
(3,822 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest-bearing deposits |
|
|
236 |
|
|
|
(3,572 |
) |
|
|
(3,336 |
) |
|
|
310 |
|
|
|
(5,644 |
) |
|
|
(5,334 |
) |
Federal Home Loan Bank advances |
|
|
(2,575 |
) |
|
|
(178 |
) |
|
|
(2,753 |
) |
|
|
(2,169 |
) |
|
|
(191 |
) |
|
|
(2,360 |
) |
Other secured borrowings |
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
311 |
|
|
|
318 |
|
|
|
(247 |
) |
|
|
(62 |
) |
|
|
(309 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest-bearing liabilities |
|
$ |
(2,332 |
) |
|
$ |
(3,439 |
) |
|
$ |
(5,771 |
) |
|
$ |
(2,106 |
) |
|
$ |
(5,897 |
) |
|
$ |
(8,003 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in net interest income |
|
$ |
5,237 |
|
|
$ |
(334 |
) |
|
$ |
4,903 |
|
|
$ |
(63 |
) |
|
$ |
4,085 |
|
|
$ |
4,022 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Liquidity is the ability to meet current and future financial obligations of a short-term
nature. Our primary sources of funds consist of deposit inflows, loan repayments, advances from
the Federal Home Loan Bank of Dallas, and maturities and sales of securities. While maturities and
scheduled amortization of loans and securities are predictable sources of funds, deposit flows, and
mortgage prepayments are greatly influenced by general interest rates, economic conditions, and
competition. Our Asset/Liability Management Committee is responsible for establishing and
monitoring our liquidity targets and strategies in order to ensure that sufficient liquidity exists
for meeting the borrowing needs and deposit withdrawals of our customers, as well as unanticipated
contingencies. We seek to maintain a liquidity ratio of 10.0% or greater. For the year ended
December 31, 2010, our liquidity ratio averaged 30.0%. We believe that we have enough sources of
liquidity to satisfy our short- and long-term liquidity needs as of December 31, 2010.
71
We regularly monitor and adjust our investments in liquid assets based upon our assessment of:
|
(i) |
|
expected loan demand; |
|
|
(ii) |
|
expected deposit flows; |
|
|
(iii) |
|
yields available on interest-earning deposits and securities; and |
|
|
(iv) |
|
the objectives of our asset/liability management program. |
Excess liquid assets are invested generally in interest-earning deposits and short- and
intermediate-term securities.
Our most liquid assets are cash and cash equivalents. The levels of these assets are affected
by our operating, financing, lending, and investing activities during any given period. At
December 31, 2010, cash and cash equivalents totaled $24.6 million. Securities classified as
available-for-sale, which provide additional sources of liquidity, totaled $317.8 million at
December 31, 2010. On that date, we had $41.0 million in Federal Home Loan Bank advances
outstanding, with the ability to borrow an additional $394.9 million.
Our cash flows are derived from operating activities, investing activities and financing
activities as reported in our Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows included in our consolidated
financial statements.
At December 31, 2010, we had $23.6 million in commitments to extend credit. In addition to
commitments to originate loans, we had $20.1 million in undisbursed lines of credit to borrowers.
Certificates of deposit due within one year of December 31, 2010 totalled $194.1 million, or 24.2%
of total deposits. If these deposits do not remain with us, we will be required to seek other
sources of funds, including loan sales and Federal Home Loan Bank advances. Depending on market
conditions, we may be required to pay higher rates on such deposits or other borrowings than we
currently pay on the certificates of deposit due on or before December 31, 2011. We believe,
however, based on past experience, that a significant portion of such deposits will remain with us.
We have the ability to attract and retain deposits by adjusting the interest rates offered.
Our primary investing activity is originating loans. We originated $235.8 million, $282.9
million, and $288.9 million of loans during the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009, and 2008,
respectively. In addition, we purchased $243.5 million, $106.1 million, and $73.6 million of
securities during the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009, and 2008, respectively.
Financing activities consist primarily of activity in deposit accounts and Federal Home Loan
Bank advances. We had a net decrease in total deposits of $108.8 million for the year ended
December 31, 2010 and a net increase in total deposits of $170.1 million for the year ended
December 31, 2009, primarily due to the effects of the initial public offering. We had a net
increase in total deposits of $10.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2008. Deposit flows
are affected by the overall level of interest rates, the interest rates and products offered by us
and our local competitors, and by other factors.
Liquidity management is both a daily and long-term function of business management. If we
require funds beyond our ability to generate them internally, borrowing agreements exist with the
Federal Home Loan Bank of Dallas, which provides an additional source of funds. Federal Home Loan
Bank advances decreased by $25.4 million and $103.5 million for the years ended December 31, 2010
and 2009, respectively, and increased $13.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2008. Federal
Home Loan Bank advances have primarily been used to fund loan demand and to purchase investment
securities. At
December 31, 2010, we had the ability to borrow up to $435.9 million from the Federal Home
Loan Bank of Dallas. In addition, we maintained $27.5 million in federal funds lines with other
financial institutions at December 31, 2010. We also have a line of credit with the Federal
Reserve Bank of Dallas which allows us to borrow on a collateralized basis at a fixed term with
pledged assignments. At December 31, 2010, the borrowing limit for this line of credit was $174.0
million.
72
Banks and bank holding companies are subject to various regulatory capital requirements,
including a risk-based capital measure. The risk-based capital guidelines include both a
definition of capital and a framework for calculating risk-weighted assets by assigning balance
sheet assets and off-balance sheet items to broad risk categories. At December 31, 2010,
OmniAmerican Bancorp, Inc. and OmniAmerican Bank exceeded all regulatory capital requirements.
OmniAmerican Bancorp, Inc. believes that, as of December 31, 2010, its bank subsidiary,
OmniAmerican Bank, is considered well capitalized under regulatory guidelines. See Item 1.
Business Supervision and Regulation Federal Banking Regulation Capital Requirements and
Note 12 Regulatory Matters of the notes to the consolidated financial statements included in
this annual report.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements and Aggregate Contractual Obligations
Commitments. As a financial services provider, we routinely are a party to various financial
instruments with off-balance-sheet risks, such as commitments to extend credit and unused lines of
credit. While these contractual obligations represent our future cash requirements, a significant
portion of commitments to extend credit may expire without being drawn upon. Such commitments are
subject to the same credit policies and approval process accorded to loans we make. For additional
information, see Note 16 Financial Instruments with Off-Balance Sheet Risk of the notes to the
consolidated financial statements included in this annual report.
Contractual Obligations. In the ordinary course of our operations, we enter into certain
contractual obligations. Such obligations include operating leases for premises and equipment, and
agreements with respect to borrowed funds and deposit liabilities.
The following table summarizes our significant fixed and determinable contractual obligations
and other funding needs by payment date at December 31, 2010. The payment amounts represent those
amounts due to the recipient and do not include any unamortized premiums or discounts or other
similar carrying amount adjustments.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments Due by Period |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
More than |
|
|
More than |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One year or |
|
|
one year to |
|
|
three years to |
|
|
More than |
|
|
|
|
|
|
less |
|
|
three years |
|
|
five years |
|
|
five years |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Contractual obligations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt (1) |
|
$ |
19,000 |
|
|
$ |
71,000 |
|
|
$ |
9,000 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
99,000 |
|
Operating leases |
|
|
456 |
|
|
|
937 |
|
|
|
787 |
|
|
|
1,210 |
|
|
|
3,390 |
|
Certificates of deposit |
|
|
194,077 |
|
|
|
122,840 |
|
|
|
25,994 |
|
|
|
52 |
|
|
|
342,963 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total contractual obligations |
|
$ |
213,533 |
|
|
$ |
194,777 |
|
|
$ |
35,781 |
|
|
$ |
1,262 |
|
|
$ |
445,353 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-balance sheet loan commitments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Undisbursed portion of loans closed |
|
$ |
3,528 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
3,528 |
|
Unused lines of credit (2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,104 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loan commitments |
|
$ |
3,528 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
23,632 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total contractual obligations and
loan commitments |
|
$ |
217,061 |
|
|
$ |
194,777 |
|
|
$ |
35,781 |
|
|
$ |
1,262 |
|
|
$ |
468,985 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes Federal Home Loan Bank advances and securities sold under agreements to repurchase. |
|
(2) |
|
Since lines of credit may expire without being drawn upon, the total commitment amount does
not necessarily represent future cash requirements. |
73
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
For discussion of Recent Accounting Pronouncements, see Note 1 Summary of Significant
Accounting and Reporting Policies Recent Accounting Pronouncements of the Notes to Consolidated
Financial Statements under Item 8 of this report.
Impact
of Inflation and Changing Prices
Our consolidated financial statements and related notes have been prepared in accordance with
U.S. GAAP. U.S. GAAP generally requires the measurement of financial position and operating
results in terms of historical dollars without consideration of changes in the relative purchasing
power of money over time due to inflation. The impact of inflation is reflected in the increased
cost of our operations. Unlike industrial companies, our assets and liabilities are primarily
monetary in nature. As a result, changes in market interest rates have a greater impact on
performance than the effects of inflation.
|
|
|
ITEM 7A. |
|
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk |
Management of Market Risk
General. Because the majority of our assets and liabilities are sensitive to changes in
interest rates, our most significant form of market risk is interest rate risk. We are vulnerable
to an increase in interest rates to the extent that our interest-bearing liabilities mature or
reprice more quickly than our interest-earning assets. As a result, a principal part of our
business strategy is to manage interest rate risk and limit the exposure of our net interest income
to changes in market interest rates. Accordingly, our board of directors has established an
Asset/Liability Management Committee, which is responsible for evaluating the interest rate risk
inherent in our assets and liabilities, for determining the level of risk that is appropriate given
our business strategy, operating environment, capital, liquidity and performance objectives, and
for managing this risk consistent with the guidelines approved by the board of directors.
Our interest rate sensitivity is monitored through the use of a net interest income simulation
model which generates estimates of the change in our net interest income over a range of interest
rate scenarios. The model assumes loan prepayment rates, reinvestment rates, and deposit decay
rates based on historical experience and current economic conditions.
We have sought to manage our interest rate risk in order to control the exposure of our
earnings and capital to changes in interest rates. As part of our ongoing asset-liability
management, we currently use the following strategies to manage our interest rate risk:
|
(i) |
|
sell the long-term, fixed-rate one- to four-family residential real estate
loans (terms greater than 15 years) that we originate into the secondary mortgage
market; |
|
(ii) |
|
lengthen the weighted average maturity of our liabilities through retail
deposit pricing strategies and through longer-term wholesale funding sources such as
fixed-rate advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank of Dallas; |
|
(iii) |
|
invest in shorter- to medium-term securities; |
74
|
(iv) |
|
originate commercial business and consumer loans, which tend to have shorter
terms and higher interest rates than residential real estate loans, and which generate
customer relationships that can result in larger noninterest-bearing demand deposit
accounts; and |
|
(v) |
|
maintain adequate levels of capital. |
We have not engaged in hedging through the use of derivatives.
Net Portfolio Value. The Office of Thrift Supervision requires the computation of amounts by
which the net present value of an institutions cash flow from assets, liabilities, and off-balance
sheet items (the institutions net portfolio value or NPV) would change in the event of a range
of assumed changes in market interest rates. The Office of Thrift Supervision provides all
institutions that file a Consolidated Maturity/Rate Schedule as a part of their quarterly Thrift
Financial Report with an interest rate sensitivity report of net portfolio value. The Office of
Thrift Supervision simulation model uses a discounted cash flow analysis and an option-based
pricing approach to measure the interest rate sensitivity of net portfolio value. Historically,
the Office of Thrift Supervision model estimated the economic value of each type of asset,
liability, and off-balance sheet contract under the assumption that the United States Treasury
yield curve increases or decreases instantaneously by 100 to 300 basis points in 100 basis point
increments. However, given the current relatively low level of market interest rates, an NPV
calculation for an interest rate decrease of greater than 100 basis points has not been prepared.
A basis point equals one-hundredth of one percent, and 100 basis points equals one percent. An
increase in interest rates from 3% to 4% would mean, for example, a 100 basis point increase in the
Change in Interest Rates column below. The Office of Thrift Supervision provides us the results
of the interest rate sensitivity model, which is based on information we provide to the Office of
Thrift Supervision to estimate the sensitivity of our net portfolio value.
75
The table below sets forth, as of December 31, 2010, the Office of Thrift Supervisions
calculation of the estimated changes in our net portfolio value that would result from the
designated immediate changes in the United States Treasury yield curve. In addition to NPV
calculations, we analyze our sensitivity to changes in interest rates through our internal net
interest income model which is also summarized in the table below at December 31, 2010.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NPV as a Percentage of |
|
|
Net Interest Income |
|
Change in |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Present Value of Assets(3) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase (Decrease) in |
|
Interest Rates |
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated Increase |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase |
|
|
Estimated |
|
|
Estimated Net Interest |
|
(basis points) |
|
Estimated |
|
|
(Decrease) in NPV |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Decrease) |
|
|
Net Interest |
|
|
Income |
|
(1) |
|
NPV(2) |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Percent |
|
|
NPV Ratio(4) |
|
|
(basis points) |
|
|
Income |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Percent |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
+300 |
|
$ |
166,054 |
|
|
$ |
(38,469 |
) |
|
|
(18.81 |
)% |
|
|
15.15 |
% |
|
|
(254 |
) |
|
$ |
36,888 |
|
|
$ |
(2,570 |
) |
|
|
(6.51 |
)% |
+200 |
|
|
181,629 |
|
|
|
(22,894 |
) |
|
|
(11.19 |
)% |
|
|
16.24 |
% |
|
|
(145 |
) |
|
|
38,221 |
|
|
|
(1,237 |
) |
|
|
(3.13 |
)% |
+100 |
|
|
194,780 |
|
|
|
(9,743 |
) |
|
|
(4.76 |
)% |
|
|
17.11 |
% |
|
|
(58 |
) |
|
|
38,980 |
|
|
|
(478 |
) |
|
|
(1.21 |
)% |
0 |
|
|
204,523 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17.69 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
39,458 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-100 |
|
|
213,176 |
|
|
|
8,653 |
|
|
|
4.23 |
% |
|
|
18.20 |
% |
|
|
51 |
|
|
|
37,746 |
|
|
|
(1,712 |
) |
|
|
(4.34 |
)% |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Assumes an instantaneous uniform change in interest rates at all maturities. |
|
(2) |
|
NPV is the discounted present value of expected cash flows from assets, liabilities, and
off-balance sheet contracts. |
|
(3) |
|
Present value of assets represents the discounted present value of incoming cash flows on
interest-earning assets. |
|
(4) |
|
NPV Ratio represents NPV divided by the present value of assets. |
Computations of prospective effects of hypothetical interest rate changes are based on
numerous assumptions, including relative levels of market interest rates, loan prepayments, and
deposit decay, and should not be relied upon as indicative of actual results. The Office of Thrift
Supervision model illustrates the change in the economic value of our assets and liabilities at
December 31, 2010 assuming an immediate change in interest rates. The table above indicates that
at December 31, 2010, under the Office of Thrift Supervision model, in the event of a 200 basis
point increase in interest rates, we would experience an 11.19% decrease in net portfolio value.
In the event of a 100 basis point decrease in interest rates, we would experience a 4.23% increase
in net portfolio value.
76
Net Interest Income. Net interest income is the difference between the interest income we
earn on our interest-earning assets, such as loans and securities, and the interest we pay on our
interest-bearing liabilities, such as deposits and borrowings. In our model, we estimate what our
net interest income would be for a rolling forward twelve-month period using historical data for
assumptions such as loan prepayment rates and deposit decay rates, the current term structure for
interest rates, and current deposit and loan offering rates. We then calculate what the net
interest income would be for the same period in the event of an instantaneous 200 basis point
increase or a 100 basis point decrease in market interest rates. As of December 31, 2010, using
our internal interest rate risk model, we estimated that our net interest income for the year ended
December 31, 2010 would decrease by 3.13% in the event of an instantaneous 200 basis point increase
in market interest rates, and would decrease by 4.34% in the event of an instantaneous 100 basis
point decrease in market interest rates.
Certain shortcomings are inherent in the methodologies used in determining interest rate risk
through changes in net portfolio value and net interest income. Modeling changes require making
certain assumptions that may or may not reflect the manner in which actual yields and costs respond
to changes in market interest rates. In this regard, the net portfolio value and net interest
income information presented assume that the composition of our interest-sensitive assets and
liabilities existing at the beginning of a period remains constant over the period being measured
and assume that a particular change in interest rates is reflected uniformly across the yield curve
regardless of the duration or repricing of specific assets and liabilities. Accordingly, although
interest rate risk calculations provide an indication of our interest rate risk exposure at a
particular point in time, such measurements are not intended to and do not provide a precise
forecast of the effect of changes in market interest rates on our net interest income and will
differ from actual results.
77
|
|
|
ITEM 8. |
|
Financial Statements and Supplementary Data |
INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF
OMNIAMERICAN BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
78
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To the Board of Directors and Audit Committee
OmniAmerican Bancorp, Inc.
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of OmniAmerican Bancorp, Inc. and
Subsidiary (the Company) as of December 31, 2010 and 2009, and the related consolidated statements
of income, changes in stockholders equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period
ended December 31, 2010. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the
Companys management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial
statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight
Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An
audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the
financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and
significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement
presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all
material respects, the financial position of OmniAmerican Bancorp, Inc. as of December 31, 2010 and
2009, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the
period ended December 31, 2010, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight
Board (United States), OmniAmerican Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiarys internal control over financial
reporting as of December 31, 2010, based on criteria established in Internal Control Integrated
Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission, and our
report dated March 10, 2011 expressed an unqualified opinion on the effectiveness of OmniAmerican
Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiarys internal control over financial reporting.
/s/ McGladrey & Pullen, LLP
Dallas, Texas
March 10, 2011
79
OmniAmerican Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiary
Consolidated Balance Sheets
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and due from financial institutions |
|
$ |
12,842 |
|
|
$ |
14,729 |
|
Short-term interest-earning deposits in other financial institutions |
|
|
11,755 |
|
|
|
125,415 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
24,597 |
|
|
|
140,144 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities available for sale (Amortized cost of $316,056 on December 31,
2010 and $207,338 on December 31, 2009) |
|
|
317,806 |
|
|
|
210,421 |
|
Other |
|
|
3,060 |
|
|
|
3,850 |
|
Loans held for sale |
|
|
861 |
|
|
|
241 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans, net of deferred fees and discounts |
|
|
669,357 |
|
|
|
706,455 |
|
Less allowance for loan losses |
|
|
(8,932 |
) |
|
|
(8,328 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans, net |
|
|
660,425 |
|
|
|
698,127 |
|
Premises and equipment, net |
|
|
47,665 |
|
|
|
50,951 |
|
Bank-owned life insurance |
|
|
20,078 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other real estate owned |
|
|
14,793 |
|
|
|
6,762 |
|
Mortgage servicing rights |
|
|
1,242 |
|
|
|
1,168 |
|
Deferred tax asset, net |
|
|
6,935 |
|
|
|
7,514 |
|
Accrued interest receivable |
|
|
3,469 |
|
|
|
3,523 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
7,488 |
|
|
|
11,226 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
1,108,419 |
|
|
$ |
1,133,927 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noninterest-bearing |
|
$ |
74,583 |
|
|
$ |
75,628 |
|
Interest-bearing |
|
|
726,575 |
|
|
|
834,338 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deposits |
|
|
801,158 |
|
|
|
909,966 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal Home Loan Bank advances |
|
|
41,000 |
|
|
|
66,400 |
|
Other secured borrowings |
|
|
58,000 |
|
|
|
58,000 |
|
Accrued expenses and other liabilities |
|
|
9,634 |
|
|
|
8,405 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
909,792 |
|
|
|
1,042,771 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, par value $0.01 per share; 100,000 shares authorized;
11,902,500 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2010 |
|
|
119 |
|
|
|
|
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
115,470 |
|
|
|
|
|
Unallocated Employee Stock Ownership Plan (ESOP) shares; 914,112 shares
at December 31, 2010 |
|
|
(9,141 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Retained earnings |
|
|
92,212 |
|
|
|
90,555 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized gain on securities available for sale, net of income taxes |
|
|
1,155 |
|
|
|
2,035 |
|
Unrealized loss on pension plan, net of income taxes |
|
|
(1,188 |
) |
|
|
(1,434 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income |
|
|
(33 |
) |
|
|
601 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
198,627 |
|
|
|
91,156 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
$ |
1,108,419 |
|
|
$ |
1,133,927 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
80
OmniAmerican Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiary
Consolidated Statements of Income
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans, including fees |
|
$ |
42,330 |
|
|
$ |
44,702 |
|
|
$ |
45,111 |
|
Securities taxable |
|
|
10,486 |
|
|
|
8,902 |
|
|
|
12,536 |
|
Securities nontaxable |
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
111 |
|
|
|
49 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest income |
|
|
52,847 |
|
|
|
53,715 |
|
|
|
57,696 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits |
|
|
9,435 |
|
|
|
12,771 |
|
|
|
18,105 |
|
Borrowed funds |
|
|
4,468 |
|
|
|
6,903 |
|
|
|
9,572 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest expense |
|
|
13,903 |
|
|
|
19,674 |
|
|
|
27,677 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income |
|
|
38,944 |
|
|
|
34,041 |
|
|
|
30,019 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
6,700 |
|
|
|
5,200 |
|
|
|
3,825 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income after provision for loan losses |
|
|
32,244 |
|
|
|
28,841 |
|
|
|
26,194 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noninterest income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service charges and other fees |
|
|
10,309 |
|
|
|
10,735 |
|
|
|
12,650 |
|
Net gains on sales and calls of securities available for sale |
|
|
464 |
|
|
|
2,516 |
|
|
|
121 |
|
Net gains on sales of loans |
|
|
1,309 |
|
|
|
1,527 |
|
|
|
1,197 |
|
Net losses on sales of repossessed assets |
|
|
(90 |
) |
|
|
(74 |
) |
|
|
(22 |
) |
Net gains on sales of fixed assets |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
Commissions |
|
|
631 |
|
|
|
781 |
|
|
|
1,166 |
|
Increase in cash surrender value of bank-owned life insurance |
|
|
78 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income |
|
|
993 |
|
|
|
973 |
|
|
|
1,150 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total noninterest income |
|
|
13,699 |
|
|
|
16,463 |
|
|
|
16,269 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noninterest expense: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salaries and benefits |
|
|
21,058 |
|
|
|
21,051 |
|
|
|
19,261 |
|
Software and equipment maintenance |
|
|
2,888 |
|
|
|
2,979 |
|
|
|
2,183 |
|
Depreciation of furniture, software and equipment |
|
|
3,159 |
|
|
|
3,684 |
|
|
|
3,515 |
|
FDIC insurance |
|
|
1,585 |
|
|
|
2,138 |
|
|
|
822 |
|
Real estate owned expense |
|
|
1,039 |
|
|
|
212 |
|
|
|
|
|
Service fees |
|
|
665 |
|
|
|
902 |
|
|
|
898 |
|
Communications costs |
|
|
832 |
|
|
|
962 |
|
|
|
985 |
|
Other operations expense |
|
|
3,803 |
|
|
|
3,587 |
|
|
|
4,309 |
|
Occupancy |
|
|
3,806 |
|
|
|
4,067 |
|
|
|
4,104 |
|
Professional and outside services |
|
|
4,015 |
|
|
|
3,204 |
|
|
|
4,281 |
|
Loan servicing |
|
|
290 |
|
|
|
429 |
|
|
|
276 |
|
Marketing |
|
|
861 |
|
|
|
542 |
|
|
|
443 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total noninterest expense |
|
|
44,001 |
|
|
|
43,757 |
|
|
|
41,077 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income tax expense |
|
|
1,942 |
|
|
|
1,547 |
|
|
|
1,386 |
|
Income tax expense |
|
|
285 |
|
|
|
892 |
|
|
|
742 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
1,657 |
|
|
$ |
655 |
|
|
$ |
644 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
0.14 |
(1) |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
0.14 |
(1) |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Calculated from the effective date of January 20, 2010 (the closing date of the
offering) |
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
81
OmniAmerican Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiary
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders Equity
(Dollars in thousands, except share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional |
|
|
Unallocated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
Common |
|
|
Paid-in |
|
|
ESOP |
|
|
Retained |
|
|
Comprehensive |
|
|
Stockholders |
|
|
|
Stock |
|
|
Capital |
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Earnings |
|
|
Income (Loss) |
|
|
Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balances at January 1, 2008 |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
89,256 |
|
|
$ |
(534 |
) |
|
$ |
88,722 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
644 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
644 |
|
Change in fair value of securities available for sale, net of
reclassification to earnings of $(121) and income tax effect of $(365) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
708 |
|
|
|
708 |
|
Change in unrealized loss on pension plan, net of income tax effect of $384 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(745 |
) |
|
|
(745 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
607 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balances at December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
89,900 |
|
|
|
(571 |
) |
|
|
89,329 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
655 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
655 |
|
Change in fair value of securities available for sale, net of
reclassification to earnings of $(2,516) and income tax effect of $(350) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
678 |
|
|
|
678 |
|
Change in unrealized loss on pension plan, net of income tax effect of $(254) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
494 |
|
|
|
494 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,827 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balances at December 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
90,555 |
|
|
|
601 |
|
|
|
91,156 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of 11,902,500 shares of common stock, net of offering costs |
|
|
119 |
|
|
|
115,407 |
|
|
|
(9,522 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
106,004 |
|
ESOP shares allocated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
63 |
|
|
|
381 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
444 |
|
Comprehensive income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,657 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,657 |
|
Change in fair value of securities available for sale, net of
reclassification to earnings of $(464) and income tax effect of $453 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(880 |
) |
|
|
(880 |
) |
Change in unrealized loss on pension plan, net of income tax effect of $(126) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
246 |
|
|
|
246 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,023 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balances at December 31, 2010 |
|
$ |
119 |
|
|
$ |
115,470 |
|
|
$ |
(9,141 |
) |
|
$ |
92,212 |
|
|
$ |
(33 |
) |
|
$ |
198,627 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
82
OmniAmerican Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiary
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Cash flows from operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
1,657 |
|
|
$ |
655 |
|
|
$ |
644 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by
(used in) operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
4,813 |
|
|
|
5,313 |
|
|
|
5,079 |
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
6,700 |
|
|
|
5,200 |
|
|
|
3,825 |
|
Amortization of net premium on investments |
|
|
4,948 |
|
|
|
719 |
|
|
|
448 |
|
Amortization of mortgage servicing rights |
|
|
393 |
|
|
|
370 |
|
|
|
34 |
|
Deferred tax provision |
|
|
906 |
|
|
|
288 |
|
|
|
333 |
|
Net gain on sale of securities available for sale |
|
|
(464 |
) |
|
|
(2,516 |
) |
|
|
(121 |
) |
Net gain on sales of loans |
|
|
(1,309 |
) |
|
|
(1,540 |
) |
|
|
(1,175 |
) |
Net gain on disposition of premises and equipment |
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
(7 |
) |
Proceeds from sales of loans held for sale |
|
|
13,836 |
|
|
|
13,608 |
|
|
|
7,288 |
|
Loans originated for sale |
|
|
(14,456 |
) |
|
|
(13,689 |
) |
|
|
(7,195 |
) |
Net loss on write-down of other real estate owned |
|
|
128 |
|
|
|
212 |
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss (gain) on sale of other real estate owned |
|
|
90 |
|
|
|
86 |
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
Increase in cash surrender value of bank-owned life insurance |
|
|
(78 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal Home Loan Bank stock dividends |
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
|
(19 |
) |
|
|
(220 |
) |
ESOP compensation expense |
|
|
444 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued interest receivable |
|
|
54 |
|
|
|
398 |
|
|
|
(38 |
) |
Other assets |
|
|
3,285 |
|
|
|
(9,335 |
) |
|
|
(887 |
) |
Accrued interest payable and other liabilities |
|
|
1,601 |
|
|
|
(1,022 |
) |
|
|
829 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities |
|
|
22,528 |
|
|
|
(1,277 |
) |
|
|
8,834 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities available for sale: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases |
|
|
(243,468 |
) |
|
|
(106,123 |
) |
|
|
(73,612 |
) |
Proceeds from sales |
|
|
20,109 |
|
|
|
62,330 |
|
|
|
40,809 |
|
Proceeds from maturities, calls and principal repayments |
|
|
110,157 |
|
|
|
66,501 |
|
|
|
47,830 |
|
Purchase of bank owned life insurance |
|
|
(20,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of other investments |
|
|
(122 |
) |
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
(1,518 |
) |
Redemptions of other investments |
|
|
927 |
|
|
|
6,193 |
|
|
|
1,789 |
|
Purchases of loans held for investment |
|
|
(4,508 |
) |
|
|
(21,460 |
) |
|
|
(78,044 |
) |
Net (increase) decrease in loans held for investment |
|
|
(18,596 |
) |
|
|
(45,614 |
) |
|
|
1,003 |
|
Proceeds from sales of loans held for investment |
|
|
44,343 |
|
|
|
71,906 |
|
|
|
65,547 |
|
Purchases of premises and equipment |
|
|
(1,528 |
) |
|
|
(2,095 |
) |
|
|
(6,123 |
) |
Proceeds from sales of premises and equipment |
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
61 |
|
Proceeds from sales of other real estate owned |
|
|
2,809 |
|
|
|
2,583 |
|
|
|
171 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities |
|
|
(109,871 |
) |
|
|
34,223 |
|
|
|
(2,087 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (decrease) increase in deposits |
|
|
(108,808 |
) |
|
|
170,120 |
|
|
|
9,951 |
|
Net (decrease) increase in Federal Home Loan Bank advances |
|
|
(25,400 |
) |
|
|
(103,500 |
) |
|
|
13,000 |
|
Net decrease in other secured borrowings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(664 |
) |
|
|
(7,492 |
) |
Proceeds from issuance of common stock |
|
|
106,004 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities |
|
|
(28,204 |
) |
|
|
65,956 |
|
|
|
15,459 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
(115,547 |
) |
|
|
98,902 |
|
|
|
22,206 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year |
|
|
140,144 |
|
|
|
41,242 |
|
|
|
19,036 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end of year |
|
$ |
24,597 |
|
|
$ |
140,144 |
|
|
$ |
41,242 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental cash flow information: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest paid |
|
$ |
13,825 |
|
|
$ |
20,662 |
|
|
$ |
27,672 |
|
Income taxes (refunded) paid |
|
$ |
(126 |
) |
|
$ |
354 |
|
|
$ |
193 |
|
Non-cash transactions: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans transferred to other real estate owned |
|
$ |
11,072 |
|
|
$ |
9,155 |
|
|
$ |
168 |
|
Loans transferred to foreclosed assets |
|
$ |
3,421 |
|
|
$ |
4,699 |
|
|
$ |
1,682 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
83
OmniAmerican Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiary
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Dollars in thousands)
NOTE 1 Summary of Significant Accounting and Reporting Policies
Nature of Operations and Basis of Presentation
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of OmniAmerican Bancorp, Inc. and its
wholly-owned subsidiary, OmniAmerican Bank, together referred to as OmniAmerican or the
Company. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in
consolidation.
OmniAmerican Bancorp, Inc., a Maryland corporation, owns all of the outstanding shares of
OmniAmerican Bank (the Bank). The Bank is a federally-chartered savings bank headquartered in
Fort Worth, Texas that provides a variety of banking and financial services to individuals and
business customers. The Banks operations are conducted primarily through its executive office and
15 branches located in the Dallas/Fort Worth Metroplex and Hood County.
Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified in order to conform to current year presentation.
Such reclassifications had no affect on net income or equity.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted
in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect
the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities
at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during
the reporting periods. Actual results could differ materially from those estimates. The allowance
for loan losses, realization of deferred tax assets, and fair values of financial instruments are
particularly subject to change.
Segment Reporting
Operating segments are components of a business about which separate financial information is
available and that are evaluated regularly by the chief operating decision-maker in deciding how to
allocate resources and assess performance. Public companies are required to report certain
financial information about operating segments in interim and annual financial statements. The
Companys chief operating decision-maker uses consolidated results to make operating and strategic
decisions. Therefore, the Company is considered to have one operating segment.
Cash and Cash Equivalents and Concentrations
Cash and cash equivalents consist of cash on hand, amounts due from banks, and investments with
maturities of three months or less at date of purchase. Net cash flows are reported for loan and
deposit transactions.
The Company maintains funds on deposit at correspondent banks which at times exceed the federally
insured limits. The Companys management monitors the balance in these accounts and periodically
assesses the financial condition of correspondent banks.
84
OmniAmerican Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiary
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(Dollars in thousands)
Investment Securities
Investments that the Company intends to hold for an indefinite period of time, but not necessarily
to maturity, are classified as available for sale and are carried at fair value. Unrealized gains
and losses on investments classified as available for sale have been accounted for as accumulated
other comprehensive income (loss).
Gains and losses on the sale of available for sale securities are determined using the
specific-identification method. Amortization of premiums and accretion of discounts are recognized
in interest income over the period to maturity. For debt securities the Company intends to sell
prior to recovery or for which it is more likely than not that the Company will have to sell prior
to recovery, impairment losses are considered other-than-temporary and the entire difference
between the securitys cost and its fair value is recorded in earnings. For debt securities the
Company does not intend to sell or for which it is more likely than not that the Company will not
have to sell prior to recovery, the Company recognizes a credit loss component of an
other-than-temporary impairment in earnings and the remaining portion of the impairment loss in
other comprehensive income. The credit loss component of an other-than-temporary impairment is
determined based upon the Companys estimate of the present value of the cash flows expected to be
collected.
The Company, as a member of the Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB) system, is required to maintain an
investment in capital stock of the FHLB in an amount between 0.05% and 0.30% of its assets plus
between 3.50% and 5.00% of advances outstanding. No ready market exists for the FHLB stock and it
has no quoted market value; however, the stock is redeemable upon proper notice given to the FHLB.
The investment in FHLB stock is carried at cost and dividends are recorded as income when received.
FHLB stock is included in other investments in the consolidated balance sheets.
Loans Held for Sale
Loans originated and intended for sale in the secondary market are carried at the lower of cost or
estimated fair value in the aggregate. These loans are normally sold with servicing released. Net
unrealized losses, if any, are recognized through a valuation allowance by charges to income.
Sales in the secondary market are recognized when full acceptance and funding has been received.
Gains and losses on sales of loans are recorded as the difference between the sales price and the
carrying value of the loan sold.
Loans
Loans that management intends to hold for the foreseeable future or until maturity or payoff are
reported at the amount of unpaid principal, net of an allowance for loan losses and deferred loan
fees and costs. Interest on loans is recognized over the terms of the loans and is calculated
using the simple interest method on principal amounts outstanding. Loan fees and certain direct
loan origination costs are deferred, and the net fee or cost is recognized as an adjustment to
interest income using the interest method over the contractual lives of the related loans. For
loans that pay-off prior to their contractual maturity, any remaining unamortized loan fees or
costs are recognized.
Premiums and discounts on purchased loans are amortized over the estimated life of the loans as an
adjustment to yield using the interest method.
85
OmniAmerican Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiary
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(Dollars in thousands)
A loan is considered impaired when, based on current information and events, it is probable that
the Company will be unable to collect the scheduled payments of principal or interest when due
according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement. Factors considered by management in
determining impairment include payment status, collateral value, and the probability of collecting
scheduled principal and interest payments when due. Loans that experience insignificant payment
delays and payment shortfalls generally are not classified as impaired. Management determines the
significance of payment delays and payment shortfalls on a case-by-case basis, taking into
consideration all of the circumstances surrounding the loan and the borrower, and the amount of the
shortfall in relation to the principal and interest owed. Impairment is measured on a loan-by-loan
basis for commercial loans by either the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at
the loans effective interest rate, the loans obtainable market price, or the fair value of the
collateral if the loan is collateral dependent.
Large groups of smaller balance homogeneous loans are collectively evaluated for impairment.
Accordingly, the Company does not separately review individual consumer and residential real estate
loans for impairment, unless such loans are the subject of a restructuring agreement.
Income Recognition on Impaired and Non-accrual Loans
The accrual of interest on loans, including impaired loans, is discontinued when management
believes that the borrowers financial condition is such that collection of interest is doubtful.
The Companys policy is generally to discontinue accrual of interest when the loan becomes 90 days
delinquent. Delinquency status is based on contractual terms of the loan. All interest accrued
but not collected for loans that are placed on non-accrual status or charged off is reversed
against interest income. Cash payments received on loans on non-accrual status reduce the
principal of the loans.
Loans may be returned to accrual status when all principal and interest amounts contractually due
are reasonably assured of repayment within an acceptable period of time and there is a sustained
period of repayment performance by the borrower, in accordance with the contractual terms of
interest and principal.
Allowance for Loan Losses
The allowance for loan losses is maintained at a level that, in managements judgment, is adequate
to cover probable credit losses inherent in the loan portfolio at the balance sheet date. The
allowance for loan losses is established as losses are estimated to have occurred through a
provision for loan losses charged to earnings. Loan losses are charged against the allowance when
management believes the uncollectability of a loan balance is confirmed. Subsequent recoveries, if
any, are credited to the allowance.
The allowance for loan losses is evaluated on a regular basis by management and is based upon
managements periodic review of the collectability of the loans in light of historical experience,
the nature and volume of the loan portfolio, adverse situations that may affect the borrowers
ability to repay, estimated value of any underlying collateral and prevailing economic conditions.
This evaluation is inherently subjective as it requires estimates that are susceptible to
significant revision as more information becomes available.
The allowance consists of specific and general components. The specific component relates to loans
that are classified as doubtful, substandard, or special mention. For such loans that are also
classified as impaired, an allowance is established when the discounted cash flows (or collateral
value or observable market price) of the impaired loan is lower than the carrying value of that
loan. The general component covers non-classified loans and is primarily based on the historical
loss experience adjusted for relevant qualitative factors.
86
OmniAmerican Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiary
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(Dollars in thousands)
The allowance for loan losses includes allowance allocations calculated in accordance with
Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) Topic 310, Receivables and allowance allocations
calculated in accordance with ASC Topic 450, Contingencies. Further information regarding the
Companys policies and methodology used to estimate the allowance for loan losses in presented in
Note 5 Loans and Allowance for Loan Losses.
Premises and Equipment
Land is carried at cost. Depreciable premises and equipment are stated at cost less accumulated
depreciation and amortization. Depreciation expense is computed on the straight-line method based
upon the estimated useful lives of the assets ranging from 20 to 40 years for buildings and
building improvements and from three to 10 years for furniture and equipment. Maintenance and
repairs are charged to noninterest expense. Renewals and betterments are added to the asset
accounts and depreciated over the periods benefited. Depreciable assets sold or retired are
removed from the asset and related accumulated depreciation accounts and any resulting gain or loss
is reflected in the income and expense accounts. The cost of leasehold improvements is amortized
using the straight-line method over the lesser of the useful lives of the assets or the terms of
the related leases.
Bank-Owned Life Insurance
The Company has purchased life insurance policies on certain key executives. Bank-owned life
insurance is recorded at the amount that can be realized under the insurance contract at the
balance sheet date, which is the cash surrender value adjusted for other charges or other amounts
due that are probable at settlement. Changes in the net cash surrender value of the policies, as
well as insurance proceeds received are reflected in non-interest income on the consolidated
statements of income and are not subject to income taxes.
Other Real Estate Owned and Foreclosed Assets
Other real estate owned is recorded at fair value less the estimated costs to sell the property at
the date of transfer to other real estate owned. The fair value of other real estate is determined
through independent third-party appraisals. At the time a loan is transferred to other real estate
owned, any carrying amount in excess of the fair value less estimated costs to sell the property is
charged off to the allowance for loan losses. Subsequently, should the fair value of an asset,
less the estimated costs to sell, decline to less than the carrying amount of the asset, the
deficiency is recognized in the period in which it becomes known and is included in noninterest
expense. Net operating expenses of properties are also included in noninterest expense. Gains and
losses realized from sales of other real estate owned are recorded in noninterest income.
Other foreclosed assets are held for sale and are initially recorded at fair value less estimated
selling costs at the date of foreclosure, establishing a new cost basis. Subsequent to
foreclosure, valuations are periodically performed by management and the assets are carried at the
lower of carrying amount or fair value less costs to sell. Foreclosed assets are included in other
assets in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. Revenues and expenses from operations and changes in the valuation allowance are
included in noninterest expense.
87
OmniAmerican Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiary
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(Dollars in thousands)
Mortgage Servicing Rights
Mortgage servicing rights are initially recorded at cost when acquired through the sale of loans
with servicing rights retained and are amortized to servicing income on loans sold in proportion to
and over the period of estimated net servicing income. The value of mortgage servicing rights at
the date of the sale of loans is determined based on the discounted present value of expected
future cash flows using key assumptions for servicing income and costs and prepayment rates on the
underlying loans.
The estimated fair value is evaluated at least annually by a third party firm for impairment by
comparing actual cash flows and estimated cash flows from the servicing assets to those estimated
at the time servicing assets were originated. The effect of changes in market interest rates on
estimated rates of loan prepayments represents the predominant risk characteristic underlying the
mortgage servicing rights portfolio. The Companys methodology for estimating the fair value of
mortgage servicing rights is highly sensitive to changes in assumptions. For example, the
determination of fair value uses anticipated prepayment speeds. Actual prepayment experience may
differ and any difference may have a material effect on the fair value. Thus, any measurement of
mortgage servicing rights fair value is limited by the conditions existing and assumptions as of
the date made. Those assumptions may not be appropriate if they are applied at different times.
Transfers of Financial Assets
Transfers of financial assets are accounted for as sales when control over the assets has been
surrendered. Control over transferred assets is deemed to be surrendered when (1) the assets have
been isolated from the Company, (2) the transferee obtains the right (free of conditions that
constrain it from taking advantage of the right) to pledge or exchange the transferred assets, and
(3) the Company does not maintain effective control over the transferred assets through an
agreement to repurchase them before their maturity.
Income Taxes
The Company accounts for income taxes using the asset and liability method of accounting for income
taxes as prescribed in Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) Topic 740, Income Taxes. Under
this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences
attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and
liabilities and their respective tax bases and net operating loss carryforwards. If currently
available information raises doubt as to the realization of the deferred tax assets, a valuation
allowance is established. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates
expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected
to be recovered or settled.
The Company evaluates uncertain tax positions at the end of each reporting period. The Company may
recognize the tax benefit from an uncertain tax position only if it is more likely than not that
the tax position will be sustained on examination by the taxing authorities, based on the technical
merits of the position. The tax benefit recognized in the financial statements from any such a
position is measured based on the largest benefit that has a greater than fifty percent likelihood
of being realized upon ultimate settlement. As of December 31, 2010 and 2009, after evaluating all
uncertain tax positions, the Company has recorded no liability for unrecognized tax benefits at the
end of the reporting period. The Company would recognize any interest accrued on unrecognized tax
benefits as other interest expense and penalties as other noninterest expense, if any. During the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009, and 2008,
the Company recognized no interest expense or penalties related to uncertain tax positions.
88
OmniAmerican Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiary
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(Dollars in thousands)
Pension Plan
The Company has a non-contributory defined benefit plan providing pension benefits covering
employees who meet certain age and service requirements. The Plan was initially established
through the Companys membership in the CUNA Mutual Group. Effective December 31, 2006, the
Company froze its defined benefit plan for current participants and closed the plan to new
participants. The compensation cost under the defined benefit plan is recognized on the net
periodic cost method over the employees approximate service period. The aggregate cost method is
utilized for funding purposes. Effective April 1, 2007, the administration of the plan was
transferred from CUNA Mutual Group to Principal Financial Group.
Comprehensive Income
Accounting principles generally require that recognized revenue, expenses, gains, and losses be
included in net income. Certain changes in assets and liabilities, such as unrealized gains and
losses on available for sale securities and the defined benefit pension plan, are reported as a
separate component of the stockholders equity section of the balance sheet.
Restrictions on Cash
Cash on hand or on deposit with the Federal Reserve Bank of $10,674 and $9,628 was required to meet
regulatory reserve and clearing requirements at December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively.
Advertising Costs
Advertising costs are charged to earnings as incurred. Advertising costs of $719, $368, and $261
were charged to earnings during the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009, and 2008, respectively.
Earnings Per Common Share
Basic earnings per common share is computed by dividing net income by the weighted-average number
of common shares outstanding for the period, reduced for unallocated ESOP shares. Diluted earnings
per common share is computed by dividing net income by the weighted-average number of common shares
outstanding for the period increased for the dilutive effect of unvested stock options and stock
awards, if any.
Employee Stock Ownership Plan (ESOP)
Compensation expense for the ESOP is recorded at an amount equal to the shares allocated by the
ESOP multiplied by the average fair market value of the shares during the period. The Company
recognizes compensation expense ratably over the year based upon the Companys estimate of the
number of shares expected to be allocated by the ESOP. The cost of shares issued to the ESOP, but
not yet allocated to participants, is shown as a reduction of stockholders equity in the
consolidated balance sheets. The difference between the average fair market value and the cost of
the shares allocated by the ESOP is recorded as an adjustment to additional paid-in capital.
89
OmniAmerican Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiary
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(Dollars in thousands)
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In January 2010, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards
Update (ASU) No. 2010-06, which was codified as ASC Topic 820, Fair Value Measurements and
Disclosures. The guidance requires companies to disclose transfers in and out of levels 1 and 2,
and to expand the reconciliation of level 3 fair value measurements by presenting separately
information about purchases, sales, issuances and settlements. The updated guidance also clarifies
existing disclosure requirements on the level of disaggregation (provide fair value measurement
disclosures for each class of assets and liabilities) and inputs and valuation techniques (disclose
for fair value measurements that fall in either level 2 or level 3). This guidance is effective
for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2009, except for disclosures
about purchases, sales, issuances and settlements in the reconciliation of level 3 fair value
measurements. Those disclosures are effective for periods beginning after December 15, 2010. The
adoption of this guidance did not have a material impact on the Companys consolidated financial
statements.
In April 2010, the FASB issued ASU No. 2010-18, Effect of a Loan Modification When the Loan is
Part of a Pool That is Accounted for as a Single Asset. As a result of the amendments in this
update, modifications of loans that are accounted for within a pool under Subtopic 310-30 do not
result in the removal of those loans from the pool even if the modification of those loans would
otherwise be considered to be a troubled debt restructuring. An entity will continue to be
required to consider whether the pool of assets in which the loan is included is impaired if
expected cash flows for the pool change. The guidance in this ASU is effective for modifications
of loans accounted for within pools under Subtopic 310-30 occurring in the first interim or annual
period ending on or after July 15, 2010. The adoption of this guidance did not have a material
impact on the Companys consolidated financial statements.
In July 2010, the FASB issued ASU No. 2010-20, Disclosures about the Credit Quality of Financing
Receivables and the Allowance for Credit Losses. ASU No. 2010-20 requires that additional
information be disclosed about the credit quality of a companys loans and the allowance for loan
losses held against those loans. A company will need to disaggregate new and existing disclosure
based on how it develops its allowance for loan losses and how it manages credit exposures.
Existing disclosures to be presented on a disaggregated basis include a rollforward of the
allowance for loan losses, the related recorded investment in such loans, the non-accrual status of
loans, and impaired loans. Additional disclosure is also required about the credit quality
indicators of loans by class at the end of the reporting period, the aging of past due loans,
information about troubled debt restructurings, and significant purchases and sales of loans during
the reporting period by class. For public companies, ASU No. 2010-20 requires certain disclosures
as of the end of a reporting period effective for periods ending on or after December 15, 2010.
Other required disclosures about activity that occurs during a reporting period are effective for
periods beginning on or after December 15, 2010. The additional disclosures required under this
ASU have been included in Note 5 Loans and Allowance for Loan Losses.
In January 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-01, Deferral of the Effective Date of Disclosures
about Troubled Debt Restructurings in Update No. 2010-20, which became effective upon issuance.
This guidance delays the effective date of the disclosures about troubled debt restructurings
required in ASU No. 2010-20 for public entities. The adoption of this guidance did not have a
material impact on the Companys financial statements.
90
OmniAmerican Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiary
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(Dollars in thousands)
NOTE 2 Plan of Conversion and Reorganization
On June 23, 2009, the Board of Directors of OmniAmerican Bank (the Bank) adopted a Plan of
Conversion (the Plan) whereby the Bank would convert from a federally chartered mutual savings
bank to a federally chartered stock savings bank. The Plan provided for the formation of a holding
company, OmniAmerican Bancorp, Inc., that would sell shares of common stock to the public and would
own 100% of the common stock of the Bank. OmniAmerican Bancorp, Inc. registered for offer and sale
11,902,500 shares of common stock, par value $0.01 per share, at a sales price of $10.00 per share.
The shares of common stock were offered to eligible account holders, depositors as of March 31,
2008, of OmniAmerican Bank and tax-qualified employee benefit plans sponsored by the Bank. On
November 12, 2009, the registration statement was declared effective by the Securities and Exchange
Commission and the Plan was approved by the Office of Thrift Supervision. The Banks members
approved the Plan on January 15, 2010.
The public stock offering closed on January 20, 2010 and the common stock began trading on the
NASDAQ Global Market on January 21, 2010 under the symbol OABC.
The stock offering resulted in gross proceeds of $119,025 through the sale of 11,902,500 shares at
$10.00 per share. Expenses related to the offering were $3,499. OmniAmerican Bancorp, Inc.
received net proceeds from the initial public offering of $115,526 and loaned $9,522 to
OmniAmerican Banks Employee Stock Ownership Plan to enable it to purchase 952,200 shares of common
stock in the offering. The remaining net proceeds were $106,004, of which $86,645 was contributed
to OmniAmerican Bank and the remainder was retained by OmniAmerican Bancorp, Inc. to be utilized
for general corporate purposes.
NOTE 3 Concentration of Funds
The Company had the following balances on deposit at another financial institution at the
dates indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Independent Bankers Bank |
|
$ |
10,179 |
|
|
$ |
124,041 |
|
91
OmniAmerican Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiary
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(Dollars in thousands)
NOTE 4 Investment Securities
The amortized cost and estimated fair values of investment securities available for sale and the
related gross unrealized gains and losses recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income
(loss) as of December 31, 2010 and 2009 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Gains |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U. S. government sponsored mortgage-backed
securities |
|
$ |
150,678 |
|
|
$ |
4,614 |
|
|
$ |
(678 |
) |
|
$ |
154,614 |
|
U. S. government sponsored collateralized
mortgage obligations |
|
|
149,336 |
|
|
|
1,914 |
|
|
|
(458 |
) |
|
|
150,792 |
|
Private-label collateralized mortgage
obligations (residential) |
|
|
3,349 |
|
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,396 |
|
Trust preferred securities |
|
|
7,693 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,773 |
) |
|
|
3,920 |
|
Other equity securities |
|
|
5,000 |
|
|
|
84 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,084 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investment securities available for sale |
|
$ |
316,056 |
|
|
$ |
6,659 |
|
|
$ |
(4,909 |
) |
|
$ |
317,806 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U. S. government sponsored mortgage-backed
securities |
|
$ |
130,090 |
|
|
$ |
5,000 |
|
|
$ |
(123 |
) |
|
$ |
134,967 |
|
U. S. government sponsored collateralized
mortgage obligations |
|
|
54,378 |
|
|
|
999 |
|
|
|
(229 |
) |
|
|
55,148 |
|
Private-label collateralized mortgage
obligations (residential) |
|
|
5,513 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(438 |
) |
|
|
5,075 |
|
Trust preferred securities |
|
|
7,762 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,158 |
) |
|
|
5,604 |
|
Municipal obligations |
|
|
4,595 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,595 |
|
Other equity securities |
|
|
5,000 |
|
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,032 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investment securities available for sale |
|
$ |
207,338 |
|
|
$ |
6,031 |
|
|
$ |
(2,948 |
) |
|
$ |
210,421 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
92
OmniAmerican Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiary
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(Dollars in thousands)
Investment securities available for sale with gross unrealized losses at December 31, 2010 and
2009, aggregated by investment category and length of time that individual securities have been in
a continuous loss position, are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuous Unrealized Losses Existing for |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less Than 12 Months |
|
|
Greater Than 12 Months |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
|
Value |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Losses |
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U. S. government sponsored mortgage-backed securities |
|
$ |
40,582 |
|
|
$ |
(678 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
40,582 |
|
|
$ |
(678 |
) |
U. S. government sponsored collateralized mortgage obligations |
|
|
36,704 |
|
|
|
(458 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36,704 |
|
|
|
(458 |
) |
Trust preferred securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,920 |
|
|
|
(3,773 |
) |
|
|
3,920 |
|
|
|
(3,773 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
77,286 |
|
|
$ |
(1,136 |
) |
|
$ |
3,920 |
|
|
$ |
(3,773 |
) |
|
$ |
81,206 |
|
|
$ |
(4,909 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U. S. government sponsored mortgage-backed securities |
|
$ |
11,680 |
|
|
$ |
(123 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
11,680 |
|
|
$ |
(123 |
) |
U. S. government sponsored collateralized mortgage obligations |
|
|
11,090 |
|
|
|
(229 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,090 |
|
|
|
(229 |
) |
Private-label collateralized mortgage obligations (residential) |
|
|
1,380 |
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
3,695 |
|
|
|
(436 |
) |
|
|
5,075 |
|
|
|
(438 |
) |
Trust preferred securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,604 |
|
|
|
(2,158 |
) |
|
|
5,604 |
|
|
|
(2,158 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
24,150 |
|
|
$ |
(354 |
) |
|
$ |
9,299 |
|
|
$ |
(2,594 |
) |
|
$ |
33,449 |
|
|
$ |
(2,948 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2010, the Company owned 238 investments of which 39 had unrealized losses. At
December 31, 2009, the Company owned 168 investments of which 15 had unrealized losses. Unrealized
losses generally result from interest rate levels differing from those existing at the time of
purchase of the securities and, as to mortgage-backed securities, estimated prepayment speeds.
These unrealized losses are considered to be temporary as they reflect fair values on December 31,
2010 and 2009, and are subject to change daily as interest rates fluctuate.
Included in the investment securities available for sale are trust preferred securities with
amortized costs of $7,693 and unrealized losses of $3,773 at December 31, 2010. The Company owns
the highly-collateralized senior tranches of the trust preferred securities. The market for these securities
is not active and markets for similar securities are also not active. The fair value of these
securities was determined using a discounted cash flow model that incorporates assumptions
regarding defaults on the underlying collateral.
93
OmniAmerican Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiary
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(Dollars in thousands)
The following table provides additional information related to our trust preferred securities as of
December 31, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PreTSL XXVI |
|
|
PreTSL XXVIII |
|
Class |
|
|
A-2 |
|
|
|
A-1 |
|
Amortized cost |
|
$ |
3,632 |
|
|
$ |
4,061 |
|
Fair value |
|
|
2,466 |
|
|
|
1,454 |
|
Unrealized loss |
|
|
(1,166 |
) |
|
|
(2,607 |
) |
Rating (S&P/Moodys) |
|
CCC/Baa3 |
|
|
CCC-/B1 |
|
Duration |
|
|
16.34 |
|
|
|
19.00 |
|
Deferrals and defaults as a percentage of collateral |
|
|
30.2 |
% |
|
|
20.5 |
% |
Based on a stress analysis performed as of December 31, 2010 of the senior tranches of the trust
preferred securities we own, we concluded that these investments were not other than temporarily
impaired. The Company does not intend to sell these securities and it is more likely than not that
the Company will not be required to sell prior to recovery. Management evaluates investment
securities for other-than-temporary impairment at least on a quarterly basis, and more frequently
when economic or market concerns warrant such evaluation. Consideration is given to (1) the length
of time and the extent to which the fair value has been less than cost, (2) the financial condition
and near-term prospects of the issuer, and (3) the intent of the Company to sell or whether it
would be more likely than not required to sell its investment in the issuer for a period of time
sufficient to allow for any anticipated recovery in fair value.
The amortized cost and fair value of securities available for sale by contractual maturity at
December 31, 2010 are summarized in the following table. Maturities are based on the final
contractual payment dates, and do not reflect the impact of prepayments or earlier redemptions that
may occur.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Due from one to five years |
|
$ |
3,552 |
|
|
$ |
3,643 |
|
Due from five to ten years |
|
|
52,256 |
|
|
|
55,157 |
|
Due after ten years |
|
|
255,248 |
|
|
|
253,922 |
|
Equity securities |
|
|
5,000 |
|
|
|
5,084 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
316,056 |
|
|
$ |
317,806 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment securities with an amortized cost of $242,514 and $130,374 at December 31, 2010 and
2009, respectively, were pledged to secure Federal Home Loan Bank advances. In addition,
investment securities with fair value of $66,207 and $67,291 at December 31, 2010 and 2009,
respectively, were pledged to secure other borrowings.
94
OmniAmerican Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiary
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(Dollars in thousands)
Sales activity of securities available for sale for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009, and
2008 was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from sales of investment securities |
|
$ |
20,109 |
|
|
$ |
62,330 |
|
|
$ |
40,809 |
|
Gross gains from sales of investment securities |
|
|
450 |
|
|
|
2,516 |
|
|
|
121 |
|
Gross losses from sales of investment
securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from calls of investment securities |
|
|
24,563 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross gains from calls of investment securities |
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gains or losses on the sales of securities are recognized at the trade date utilizing the specific
identification method.
Other investments consisted of the following at the dates indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal Home Loan Bank of Dallas stock |
|
$ |
2,913 |
|
|
$ |
3,825 |
|
Valesco Commerce SBIC Investment Fund |
|
|
122 |
|
|
|
|
|
Community Development Investment |
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
3,060 |
|
|
$ |
3,850 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company views its investment in the stock of the FHLB of Dallas as a long-term investment.
Accordingly, when evaluating for impairment, the value is determined based on the ultimate recovery
of the par value rather than recognizing temporary declines in value. The decision of whether
impairment exists is a matter of judgment that should reflect the investors views on the FHLB of
Dallas long term performance, which includes factors such as its operating performance, the
severity and duration of declines of the market value of its net assets relative to its capital
stock amount, its commitment to make payments required by law or regulation and the level of such
payments in relation to its operating performance, the impact of legislative and regulation changes
on the FHLB of Dallas and accordingly, on the members of the FHLB of Dallas, and its liquidity and
funding position. The Company does not believe that its investment in the FHLB of Dallas was
impaired at December 31, 2010 or 2009.
95
OmniAmerican Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiary
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(Dollars in thousands)
NOTE 5 Loans and Allowance for Loan Losses
The composition of the loan portfolio was as follows at the dates indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential Real Estate Loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One- to four-family |
|
$ |
271,792 |
|
|
$ |
257,265 |
|
Home equity |
|
|
26,670 |
|
|
|
28,526 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total residential real estate loans |
|
|
298,462 |
|
|
|
285,791 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial Loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial real estate |
|
|
87,887 |
|
|
|
100,985 |
|
Real estate construction |
|
|
34,502 |
|
|
|
36,843 |
|
Commercial business |
|
|
48,733 |
|
|
|
59,325 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total commercial loans |
|
|
171,122 |
|
|
|
197,153 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer Loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Automobile, indirect |
|
|
156,708 |
|
|
|
176,775 |
|
Automobile, direct |
|
|
24,523 |
|
|
|
28,722 |
|
Unsecured |
|
|
13,416 |
|
|
|
14,323 |
|
Other |
|
|
5,287 |
|
|
|
5,001 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total consumer loans |
|
|
199,934 |
|
|
|
224,821 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans |
|
|
669,518 |
|
|
|
707,765 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred fees and discounts |
|
|
(161 |
) |
|
|
(1,310 |
) |
Allowance for loan losses |
|
|
(8,932 |
) |
|
|
(8,328 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans receivable, net |
|
$ |
660,425 |
|
|
$ |
698,127 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A large percentage of the Companys customers work or reside in Tarrant or Dallas County, and in
the surrounding areas. Although the Company has a diversified loan portfolio, borrowers ability
to repay loans may be affected by the economic climate of the overall geographic region in which
borrowers reside.
In 2008, the Bank began purchasing one- to four-family residential loans at a discounted price to
the principal balance of the mortgage loans. These loans did not exhibit evidence of credit
deterioration at the time of purchase. The discount on the purchased loans is accreted to interest
income using the effective interest method for fixed rate loans and using the straight-line method
for adjustable rate loans. As of December 31, 2010, the total outstanding loan balance of all
purchased one- to four-family residential loans was $23,878, while the carrying value, net of
purchase discounts was $20,354. As of December 31, 2009, the total outstanding loan balance of all
purchased one- to four-family residential loans was $30,253, while the carrying value, net of
purchase discounts, was $25,494.
In 2009, the Company established a line of credit with the Federal Reserve Bank. As of December
31, 2010, $24,092 of commercial loans and $149,888 of consumer loans were pledged as collateral for
this line of credit.
96
OmniAmerican Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiary
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(Dollars in thousands)
The following table presents loans identified as impaired by class of loans as of December 31, 2010
and 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unpaid |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
Interest |
|
|
|
Recorded |
|
|
Principal |
|
|
Related |
|
|
Recorded |
|
|
Income |
|
|
|
Investment |
|
|
Balance |
|
|
Allowance |
|
|
Investment |
|
|
Recognized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
With no related allowance recorded: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One- to four-family |
|
$ |
5,045 |
|
|
$ |
5,045 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
4,732 |
|
|
$ |
276 |
|
Home equity |
|
|
210 |
|
|
|
210 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
222 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
Commercial real estate |
|
|
9,241 |
|
|
|
9,241 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,441 |
|
|
|
141 |
|
Real estate construction |
|
|
1,126 |
|
|
|
1,126 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
590 |
|
|
|
36 |
|
Commercial business |
|
|
1,296 |
|
|
|
1,296 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,372 |
|
|
|
77 |
|
Automobile, indirect |
|
|
628 |
|
|
|
628 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
748 |
|
|
|
46 |
|
Automobile, direct |
|
|
123 |
|
|
|
123 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
180 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
Unsecured |
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
Other consumer |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impaired loans with no related allowance
recorded |
|
|
17,676 |
|
|
|
17,676 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,292 |
|
|
|
608 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
With an allowance recorded: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One- to four-family |
|
$ |
3,272 |
|
|
$ |
3,272 |
|
|
$ |
131 |
|
|
$ |
3,306 |
|
|
$ |
85 |
|
Home equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial real estate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate construction |
|
|
10,352 |
|
|
|
10,352 |
|
|
|
701 |
|
|
|
1,546 |
|
|
|
24 |
|
Commercial business |
|
|
2,025 |
|
|
|
2,025 |
|
|
|
1,477 |
|
|
|
978 |
|
|
|
46 |
|
Automobile, indirect |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Automobile, direct |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unsecured |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other consumer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impaired loans with an allowance recorded |
|
|
15,649 |
|
|
|
15,649 |
|
|
|
2,309 |
|
|
|
5,830 |
|
|
|
155 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
33,325 |
|
|
$ |
33,325 |
|
|
$ |
2,309 |
|
|
$ |
24,122 |
|
|
$ |
763 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
With no related allowance recorded: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One- to four-family |
|
$ |
3,421 |
|
|
$ |
3,421 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,670 |
|
|
$ |
50 |
|
Home equity |
|
|
124 |
|
|
|
124 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
110 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
Commercial real estate |
|
|
7,199 |
|
|
|
7,199 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,340 |
|
|
|
32 |
|
Real estate construction |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
421 |
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial business |
|
|
153 |
|
|
|
153 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
99 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
Automobile, indirect |
|
|
711 |
|
|
|
711 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
852 |
|
|
|
61 |
|
Automobile, direct |
|
|
227 |
|
|
|
227 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
187 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
Unsecured |
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other consumer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impaired loans with no related allowance
recorded |
|
|
11,842 |
|
|
|
11,842 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,682 |
|
|
|
166 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
With an allowance recorded: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One- to four-family |
|
$ |
3,351 |
|
|
$ |
3,351 |
|
|
$ |
131 |
|
|
$ |
839 |
|
|
$ |
10 |
|
Home equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial real estate |
|
|
2,220 |
|
|
|
2,220 |
|
|
|
377 |
|
|
|
1,480 |
|
|
|
50 |
|
Real estate construction |
|
|
749 |
|
|
|
749 |
|
|
|
77 |
|
|
|
187 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
Commercial business |
|
|
240 |
|
|
|
240 |
|
|
|
102 |
|
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
Automobile, indirect |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Automobile, direct |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unsecured |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other consumer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impaired loans with an allowance recorded |
|
|
6,560 |
|
|
|
6,560 |
|
|
|
687 |
|
|
|
2,556 |
|
|
|
68 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
18,402 |
|
|
$ |
18,402 |
|
|
$ |
687 |
|
|
$ |
9,238 |
|
|
$ |
234 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2010 and 2009, no additional funds were committed to be advanced in
connection with impaired loans.
97
OmniAmerican Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiary
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(Dollars in thousands)
Included in impaired loans as of December 31, 2010 and 2009 were troubled debt restructured loans
of $19,496 and $18,403, respectively.
The following table presents the recorded investment in non-accrual loans by class of loans as of
December 31, 2010 and 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential Real Estate Loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One- to four-family |
|
$ |
2,294 |
|
|
$ |
1,640 |
|
Home equity |
|
|
230 |
|
|
|
94 |
|
Commercial Loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial real estate |
|
|
5,587 |
|
|
|
6,304 |
|
Real estate construction |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial business |
|
|
1,051 |
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer Loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Automobile, indirect |
|
|
78 |
|
|
|
195 |
|
Automobile, direct |
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
30 |
|
Unsecured |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
9,251 |
|
|
$ |
8,273 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There were no loans greater than 90 days past due that continued to accrue interest at
December 31, 2010 or 2009.
The following table presents the aging of the recorded investment in past due loans as of December
31, 2010 and 2009 by class of loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Greater |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30-59 |
|
|
60-89 |
|
|
than |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Days |
|
|
Days |
|
|
90 Days |
|
|
Total |
|
|
Loans Not |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Past Due |
|
|
Past Due |
|
|
Past Due |
|
|
Past Due |
|
|
Past Due |
|
|
Total |
|
At December 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential real estate loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One- to four-family |
|
$ |
2,499 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
2,294 |
|
|
$ |
4,793 |
|
|
$ |
266,999 |
|
|
$ |
271,792 |
|
Home equity |
|
|
46 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
230 |
|
|
|
276 |
|
|
|
26,394 |
|
|
|
26,670 |
|
Commercial loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial real estate |
|
|
4,105 |
|
|
|
149 |
|
|
|
1,568 |
|
|
|
5,822 |
|
|
|
82,065 |
|
|
|
87,887 |
|
Real estate construction |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34,502 |
|
|
|
34,502 |
|
Commercial business |
|
|
|
|
|
|
359 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
359 |
|
|
|
48,374 |
|
|
|
48,733 |
|
Consumer loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Automobile, indirect |
|
|
1,434 |
|
|
|
204 |
|
|
|
78 |
|
|
|
1,716 |
|
|
|
154,992 |
|
|
|
156,708 |
|
Automobile, direct |
|
|
45 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
65 |
|
|
|
24,458 |
|
|
|
24,523 |
|
Unsecured |
|
|
96 |
|
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
136 |
|
|
|
13,280 |
|
|
|
13,416 |
|
Other |
|
|
78 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
78 |
|
|
|
5,209 |
|
|
|
5,287 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans |
|
$ |
8,303 |
|
|
$ |
761 |
|
|
$ |
4,181 |
|
|
$ |
13,245 |
|
|
$ |
656,273 |
|
|
$ |
669,518 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
98
OmniAmerican Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiary
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Greater |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30-59 |
|
|
60-89 |
|
|
than |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Days |
|
|
Days |
|
|
90 Days |
|
|
Total |
|
|
Loans Not |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Past Due |
|
|
Past Due |
|
|
Past Due |
|
|
Past Due |
|
|
Past Due |
|
|
Total |
|
At December 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential real estate loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One- to four-family |
|
$ |
7,757 |
|
|
$ |
53 |
|
|
$ |
1,640 |
|
|
$ |
9,450 |
|
|
$ |
247,815 |
|
|
$ |
257,265 |
|
Home equity |
|
|
240 |
|
|
|
73 |
|
|
|
94 |
|
|
|
407 |
|
|
|
28,119 |
|
|
|
28,526 |
|
Commercial loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial real estate |
|
|
63 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
103 |
|
|
|
166 |
|
|
|
100,819 |
|
|
|
100,985 |
|
Real estate construction |
|
|
414 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
414 |
|
|
|
36,429 |
|
|
|
36,843 |
|
Commercial business |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
59,325 |
|
|
|
59,325 |
|
Consumer loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Automobile, indirect |
|
|
1,610 |
|
|
|
245 |
|
|
|
195 |
|
|
|
2,050 |
|
|
|
174,725 |
|
|
|
176,775 |
|
Automobile, direct |
|
|
188 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
224 |
|
|
|
28,498 |
|
|
|
28,722 |
|
Unsecured |
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
61 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
111 |
|
|
|
14,212 |
|
|
|
14,323 |
|
Other |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
4,991 |
|
|
|
5,001 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans |
|
$ |
10,323 |
|
|
$ |
438 |
|
|
$ |
2,071 |
|
|
$ |
12,832 |
|
|
$ |
694,933 |
|
|
$ |
707,765 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our methodology for evaluating the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses consists of:
|
|
a specific loss component which is the allowance for impaired loans as required by ASC 310-10,
Receivables, and |
|
|
a general loss component for all other loans not individually evaluated for impairment but that,
on a portfolio basis, are believed to have some inherent but unidentified loss in accordance with
ASC 450-10, Contingencies. |
The specific component of the allowance
for loan losses relates to loans that are classified as
doubtful, substandard, or special mention. For such loans that are also classified as impaired, an
allowance is established when the discounted cash flows (or collateral value or observable market
price) of the impaired loan is lower than the carrying value of that loan. A loan is considered
impaired when, based on current information and events, it is
probable that the Company will be unable to
collect the scheduled payments of principal or interest when due according to the contractual terms
of the loan agreement. Factors considered by management in determining impairment include payment
status, collateral value and the probability of collecting scheduled principal and interest
payments when due. Loans that experience insignificant payment delays and payment shortfalls
generally are not classified as impaired. Management determines the significance of payment delays
and payment shortfalls on a case-by-case basis, taking into consideration all of the circumstances
surrounding the loan and the borrower, and the amount of the shortfall in relation to the principal
and interest owed. Impairment is measured on a loan-by-loan basis for non-homogenous loans,
including one- to four-family residential real estate loans with balances in excess of $1,000,
commercial real estate, real estate construction, and commercial business loans by either the
present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loans effective interest rate, the
loans obtainable market price, or the fair value of the collateral if the loan is collateral
dependent. Large groups of smaller balance homogeneous loans are collectively evaluated for
impairment. Accordingly, consumer and one- to four-family
residential real estate loans with balances less than $1,000 are not
separately identified for impairment disclosures, unless
such loans are the subject of a restructuring agreement.
99
OmniAmerican Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiary
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(Dollars in thousands)
The general component of the allowance for loan losses covers unimpaired loans and is based on the
historical loss experience adjusted for other qualitative factors. The loan portfolio is
stratified into homogeneous groups of loans that possess similar loss potential characteristics and an appropriate
loss ratio adjusted for other qualitative factors is applied to the homogeneous pools of loans to
estimate the incurred losses in the loan portfolio. The other qualitative factors considered by
management include, but are not limited to, the following:
|
|
changes in lending policies and procedures, including underwriting standards and collection,
charge-off, and recovery practices; |
|
|
changes in national and local economic and business conditions and developments, including the
condition of various market segments; |
|
|
changes in the nature and volume of the loan portfolio; |
|
|
changes in the experience, ability, and depth of knowledge of the management of the lending
staff; |
|
|
changes in the trend of the volume and severity of past due and classified loans; and trends in
the volume of non-accrual loans, troubled debt restructurings, and other loan modifications; |
|
|
changes in the quality of our loan review system and the degree of oversight by the board of
directors; |
|
|
the existence and effect of any concentrations of credit, and changes in the level of such
concentrations; and |
|
|
the effect of external factors such as competition and legal and regulatory requirements on the
level of estimated credit losses in our current portfolio. |
Consumer loans generally have
greater risk of loss or default than one- to four-family residential real estate loans,
particularly in the case of loans that are secured by rapidly depreciable assets, such as
automobiles, or loans that are unsecured. In these cases, a risk exists that the collateral,
if any, for a defaulted loan may not provide an adequate source of repayment of the outstanding
loan balance. Furthermore, the application of various federal and state laws, including
bankruptcy and insolvency laws, may limit the ability to recover on consumer loans.
Commercial real estate loans generally have greater credit risks compared to one- to four-family
residential real estate loans, as they typically involve larger loan balances concentrated with
single borrowers or groups of related borrowers. In addition, the payment experience on loans
secured by income-producing properties typically depends on the successful operation of the related
real estate project and thus may be subject to a greater extent to adverse conditions in the real
estate market and in the general economy.
Commercial business loans involve a greater risk of default than residential real estate loans of
like duration since their repayment generally depends on the successful operation of the borrowers
business and the sufficiency of collateral, if any. Loans secured by multi-family residential real
estate generally involve a greater degree of credit risk than one- to four-family residential real
estate loans and carry larger loan balances. This increased credit risk is a result of several
factors, including the concentration of principal in a limited number of loans and borrowers, the
effects of general economic conditions on income producing properties, and the increased difficulty
of evaluating and monitoring these types of loans. Furthermore, the repayment of loans secured by
multi-family mortgages typically depends upon the successful operation of the related real estate
property. If the cash flow from the project is reduced, the borrowers ability to repay the loan
may be impaired.
100
OmniAmerican Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiary
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(Dollars in thousands)
Real estate construction loans
generally have greater credit risk than traditional one- to
four-family residential real estate loans. The repayment of these loans depends upon the sale of
the property to third parties or the availability of permanent financing upon completion of all
improvements. In the
event a loan is made on property that is not yet approved for the planned development, there is the
risk that approvals will not be granted or will be delayed. These events may adversely affect the
borrower and the collateral value of the property. Real estate construction loans also expose us
to the risk that improvements will not be completed on time in accordance with specifications and
projected costs. In addition, the ultimate sale or rental of the property may not occur as
anticipated.
When establishing the allowance for loan losses, management categorizes loans into risk categories
based on the class of loans: residential real estate, commercial, or consumer, and relevant
information about the ability of the borrowers to repay the loans such as: the current economic
conditions, historical payment experience, the nature and volume of the loan portfolio, the
financial strength of the borrower and the estimated value of any underlying collateral, among
other factors. Management classifies the loans individually analyzed for impairment as to credit
risk. This analysis includes residential real estate loans with an outstanding balance in excess
of $1,000 and non-homogeneous loans, such as commercial real estate, real estate construction, and
commercial business loans. The following definitions for the credit risk ratings are used for such
loans:
Special mention. Special mention loans have potential weaknesses that deserve managements
close attention. If left uncorrected, these potential weaknesses may result in
deterioration of the repayment prospects for the asset or in the institutions credit
position at some future date. Special Mention assets are not adversely classified and do
not expose the institution to sufficient risk to warrant adverse classification.
Substandard. Substandard loans have well defined weaknesses where a payment default and/or
a loss is possible, but not yet probable. Loans so classified are inadequately protected by
the current net worth and repayment capacity of the obligor or of the collateral pledged, if
any. If deficiencies are not corrected quickly, there is a possibility of loss.
Doubtful. Doubtful loans have the weaknesses and characteristics of Substandard loans, but
the available information suggests that collection or liquidation in its entirety, on the
basis of currently existing facts, conditions and values, is highly improbable. The
possibility of a loss is exceptionally high, but certain identifiable contingencies could
possibly arise (proposed merger, acquisition, capital injection, refinancing plans, and
pledging of additional collateral) that may strengthen the loan, such that it is reasonable
to defer its classification as a loss until a more exact status is determined.
Loans not meeting the criteria described above that are analyzed individually for impairment are
considered to be pass-rated loans. The following table presents the risk category of loans by
class for loans individually analyzed for impairment as of December 31, 2010 and 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real Estate |
|
|
Commercial |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial Real Estate |
|
|
Construction |
|
|
Business |
|
|
One-to Four-Family |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pass |
|
$ |
67,237 |
|
|
$ |
73,668 |
|
|
$ |
23,024 |
|
|
$ |
21,009 |
|
|
$ |
35,848 |
|
|
$ |
53,904 |
|
|
$ |
24,282 |
|
|
$ |
19,699 |
|
|
$ |
150,391 |
|
|
$ |
168,280 |
|
Special Mention |
|
|
4,940 |
|
|
|
6,551 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,349 |
|
|
|
4,377 |
|
|
|
4,888 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,317 |
|
|
|
25,788 |
|
Substandard |
|
|
15,710 |
|
|
|
20,766 |
|
|
|
11,478 |
|
|
|
1,485 |
|
|
|
8,508 |
|
|
|
478 |
|
|
|
3,272 |
|
|
|
3,351 |
|
|
|
38,968 |
|
|
|
26,080 |
|
Doubtful |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
55 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
55 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
87,887 |
|
|
$ |
100,985 |
|
|
$ |
34,502 |
|
|
$ |
36,843 |
|
|
$ |
48,733 |
|
|
$ |
59,325 |
|
|
$ |
27,554 |
|
|
$ |
23,050 |
|
|
$ |
198,676 |
|
|
$ |
220,203 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
101
OmniAmerican Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiary
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(Dollars in thousands)
The Company classifies residential real estate loans that are not analyzed individually for
impairment (less than $1,000) as prime or subprime. The Company defines a subprime residential real
estate loan as any loan to a borrower who has no credit score or a credit score of less than 661 along with at
least one of the following at the time of funding:
|
|
|
Two or more 30 day delinquencies in the past 12 months |
|
|
|
1 or more 60 day delinquencies in the past 24 months |
|
|
|
Bankruptcy filing within the past 60 months |
|
|
|
Judgment or unpaid charge-off of $0.5 or more in the last 24 months |
|
|
|
Foreclosure or repossession in the past 24 months |
All other residential real estate loans not individually analyzed for impairment are classified as
prime.
The following table presents the prime and subprime residential real estate loans collectively
evaluated for impairment as of December 31, 2010 and 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One-to Four-Family |
|
|
Home Equity |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prime |
|
$ |
206,277 |
|
|
$ |
217,164 |
|
|
$ |
25,879 |
|
|
$ |
27,720 |
|
|
$ |
232,156 |
|
|
$ |
244,884 |
|
Subprime |
|
|
37,961 |
|
|
|
17,051 |
|
|
|
791 |
|
|
|
806 |
|
|
|
38,752 |
|
|
|
17,857 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
244,238 |
|
|
$ |
234,215 |
|
|
$ |
26,670 |
|
|
$ |
28,526 |
|
|
$ |
270,908 |
|
|
$ |
262,741 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company evaluates consumer loans based on the credit score for each borrower when the loan
is originated. The Company defines a sub-prime consumer loan as any loan to a borrower who has a
credit score of less than 661 at the time of funding. The following table presents the credit
score for each of the classes of consumer loans as of December 31, 2010 and 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Automobile, indirect |
|
|
Automobile, direct |
|
|
Unsecured |
|
|
Other |
|
|
Total |
|
Risk Tier |
|
Credit Score |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A |
|
|
720+ |
|
|
$ |
81,868 |
|
|
$ |
117,993 |
|
|
$ |
18,853 |
|
|
$ |
22,057 |
|
|
$ |
10,233 |
|
|
$ |
10,480 |
|
|
$ |
4,510 |
|
|
$ |
4,193 |
|
|
$ |
115,464 |
|
|
$ |
154,723 |
|
B |
|
|
690719 |
|
|
|
39,006 |
|
|
|
35,799 |
|
|
|
2,557 |
|
|
|
3,007 |
|
|
|
1,638 |
|
|
|
1,900 |
|
|
|
363 |
|
|
|
283 |
|
|
|
43,564 |
|
|
|
40,989 |
|
C |
|
|
660689 |
|
|
|
23,762 |
|
|
|
14,440 |
|
|
|
1,646 |
|
|
|
1,777 |
|
|
|
1,103 |
|
|
|
1,268 |
|
|
|
272 |
|
|
|
343 |
|
|
|
26,783 |
|
|
|
17,828 |
|
D |
|
659 and under |
|
|
12,072 |
|
|
|
8,543 |
|
|
|
1,467 |
|
|
|
1,881 |
|
|
|
442 |
|
|
|
675 |
|
|
|
142 |
|
|
|
182 |
|
|
|
14,123 |
|
|
|
11,281 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
156,708 |
|
|
$ |
176,775 |
|
|
$ |
24,523 |
|
|
$ |
28,722 |
|
|
$ |
13,416 |
|
|
$ |
14,323 |
|
|
$ |
5,287 |
|
|
$ |
5,001 |
|
|
$ |
199,934 |
|
|
$ |
224,821 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
102
OmniAmerican Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiary
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(Dollars in thousands)
The following table presents the activity in the allowance for loan losses and the recorded
investment in loans by portfolio segment based on impairment method as of and for the years ended
December 31, 2010 and 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real Estate |
|
|
Commercial |
|
|
Consumer |
|
|
Total |
|
2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan losses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning balance |
|
$ |
1,477 |
|
|
$ |
4,000 |
|
|
$ |
2,851 |
|
|
$ |
8,328 |
|
Charge-offs |
|
|
(386 |
) |
|
|
(3,894 |
) |
|
|
(2,186 |
) |
|
|
(6,466 |
) |
Recoveries |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
337 |
|
|
|
370 |
|
Provisions |
|
|
271 |
|
|
|
4,765 |
|
|
|
1,664 |
|
|
|
6,700 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance |
|
$ |
1,365 |
|
|
$ |
4,901 |
|
|
$ |
2,666 |
|
|
$ |
8,932 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance attributable to loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Individually evaluated for impairment |
|
$ |
131 |
|
|
$ |
2,178 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
2,309 |
|
Collectively evaluated for impairment |
|
|
1,234 |
|
|
|
2,723 |
|
|
|
2,666 |
|
|
|
6,623 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total ending balance |
|
$ |
1,365 |
|
|
$ |
4,901 |
|
|
$ |
2,666 |
|
|
$ |
8,932 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance attributable to loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Individually evaluated for impairment |
|
$ |
8,527 |
|
|
$ |
24,040 |
|
|
$ |
758 |
|
|
$ |
33,325 |
|
Collectively evaluated for impairment |
|
|
289,935 |
|
|
|
147,082 |
|
|
|
199,176 |
|
|
|
636,193 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total ending balance |
|
$ |
298,462 |
|
|
$ |
171,122 |
|
|
$ |
199,934 |
|
|
$ |
669,518 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan losses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning balance |
|
$ |
1,092 |
|
|
$ |
4,608 |
|
|
$ |
2,570 |
|
|
$ |
8,270 |
|
Charge-offs |
|
|
(183 |
) |
|
|
(2,120 |
) |
|
|
(3,329 |
) |
|
|
(5,632 |
) |
Recoveries |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
486 |
|
|
|
490 |
|
Provisions |
|
|
566 |
|
|
|
1,510 |
|
|
|
3,124 |
|
|
|
5,200 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance |
|
$ |
1,477 |
|
|
$ |
4,000 |
|
|
$ |
2,851 |
|
|
$ |
8,328 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance attributable to loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Individually evaluated for impairment |
|
$ |
131 |
|
|
$ |
556 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
687 |
|
Collectively evaluated for impairment |
|
|
1,346 |
|
|
|
3,444 |
|
|
|
2,851 |
|
|
|
7,641 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total ending balance |
|
$ |
1,477 |
|
|
$ |
4,000 |
|
|
$ |
2,851 |
|
|
$ |
8,328 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance attributable to loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Individually evaluated for impairment |
|
$ |
6,896 |
|
|
$ |
10,561 |
|
|
$ |
945 |
|
|
$ |
18,402 |
|
Collectively evaluated for impairment |
|
|
278,895 |
|
|
|
186,592 |
|
|
|
223,876 |
|
|
|
689,363 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total ending balance |
|
$ |
285,791 |
|
|
$ |
197,153 |
|
|
$ |
224,821 |
|
|
$ |
707,765 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table presents the activity in the allowance for loan losses for the year ended
December 31, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, beginning of year |
|
$ |
7,386 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
3,825 |
|
Loans charged-off |
|
|
(3,520 |
) |
Recoveries of loans previously charged-off |
|
|
579 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, end of period |
|
$ |
8,270 |
|
|
|
|
|
103
OmniAmerican Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiary
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(Dollars in thousands)
NOTE 6 Mortgage Servicing Rights
The Company originates one- to four-family residential real estate loans which are sold in the
secondary market. The Company retains the servicing for residential real estate loans that are
sold to the Federal National Mortgage Association (Fannie Mae). Residential real estate loans
serviced for Fannie Mae are not included as assets on the consolidated balance sheets.
Following is an analysis of the changes in mortgage servicing rights for the years indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Carrying value, before valuation allowance: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, beginning of year |
|
$ |
1,255 |
|
|
$ |
765 |
|
|
$ |
65 |
|
Additions |
|
|
490 |
|
|
|
860 |
|
|
|
734 |
|
Amortization |
|
|
(393 |
) |
|
|
(370 |
) |
|
|
(34 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, end of year |
|
|
1,352 |
|
|
|
1,255 |
|
|
|
765 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Valuation allowance: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, beginning of year |
|
|
(87 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impairment charge |
|
|
(23 |
) |
|
|
(87 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Recovery |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, end of year |
|
|
(110 |
) |
|
|
(87 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying value of mortgage servicing rights |
|
$ |
1,242 |
|
|
$ |
1,168 |
|
|
$ |
765 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of mortgage servicing rights |
|
$ |
1,242 |
|
|
$ |
1,168 |
|
|
$ |
765 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage loans serviced |
|
$ |
122,510 |
|
|
$ |
104,927 |
|
|
$ |
60,198 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The amount of contractually specified servicing fees for one- to four-family residential loans was
$319, $247, and $73 for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009, and 2008, respectively. The
servicing fees for one- to four-family residential loans are recorded in service charges and other
fees on the consolidated statements of income.
NOTE 7 Premises and Equipment
Premises and equipment were as follows at the dates indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land |
|
$ |
6,696 |
|
|
$ |
6,690 |
|
Buildings and improvements |
|
|
46,820 |
|
|
|
46,298 |
|
Furniture and equipment |
|
|
35,701 |
|
|
|
42,190 |
|
Leasehold improvements |
|
|
3,037 |
|
|
|
3,118 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
92,254 |
|
|
|
98,296 |
|
Accumulated amortization and depreciation |
|
|
(44,589 |
) |
|
|
(47,345 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
47,665 |
|
|
$ |
50,951 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
104
OmniAmerican Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiary
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(Dollars in thousands)
Depreciation and amortization charged to expense amounted to $4,813, $5,313, and $5,079 for the
years ended December 31, 2010, 2009, and 2008, respectively.
At December 31, 2010, the Company had certain non-cancelable operating leases for premises with
future minimum annual rental payments as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011 |
|
$ |
456 |
|
2012 |
|
|
471 |
|
2013 |
|
|
466 |
|
2014 |
|
|
406 |
|
2015 |
|
|
381 |
|
Thereafter |
|
|
1,210 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
3,390 |
|
|
|
|
|
Rent expense was $520, $602, and $560 for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009, and 2008,
respectively.
The lease for a branch located in Arlington, Texas expired on December 31, 2010. The branch was
closed on December 28, 2010.
The lease for offices located in west Fort Worth and occupied by certain administrative departments
expired on October 31, 2010. The Company has entered into a ten-year lease for office space
located north of downtown Fort Worth. The relocation to the new offices is expected to occur in
March 2011.
The Company owns a 202,000 square-foot office building in Fort Worth, Texas that it uses for its
administrative headquarters and certain bank operations. The Company occupies approximately 51,000
square feet of the building and leases the remaining space to various tenants. Gross rental income
from these leases of $2,583, $2,488, and $2,515 was recognized for the years ended December 31,
2010, 2009, and 2008, respectively. At December 31, 2010, non-cancelable operating leases for the
building with future minimum lease payments are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011 |
|
$ |
2,439 |
|
2012 |
|
|
1,932 |
|
2013 |
|
|
1,731 |
|
2014 |
|
|
1,738 |
|
2015 |
|
|
1,452 |
|
Thereafter |
|
|
2,194 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
11,486 |
|
|
|
|
|
105
OmniAmerican Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiary
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(Dollars in thousands)
NOTE 8 Other Real Estate Owned and Other Foreclosed Assets
At December 31, 2010 and 2009, other real estate owned totaled $14,793 and $6,762, respectively.
The other real estate owned at December 31, 2010 included seven foreclosed single-family
residential properties with fair market values totaling $2,196, five commercial real estate
properties with fair market values totaling $8,952 and six units of a condominium project
foreclosed in 2009 with fair market values totaling $3,369. During the year ended December 31,
2010, ten foreclosed single-family residential properties, two units of the condominium project and
mineral rights related to a foreclosed commercial property were sold for net proceeds of $2,809 and
net losses of $103 were recorded related to the sales of these properties. The other real estate
owned at December 31, 2009 included two foreclosed single-family residential properties with a fair
market value of $671, a commercial real estate property with a fair market value of $1,390 and
eight units of a condominium project with a fair market value of $4,425. During the year ended
December 31, 2009, two foreclosed single-family residential properties and one unit of the
condominium project were sold for net proceeds of $2,583 and net losses of $86 were recorded
related to the sales of these properties. During the year ended December 31, 2008, one foreclosed
single-family residential property was sold for net proceeds of $171 and a gain of $3 was recorded
related to the sale of the property.
In addition, at December 31, 2010 and 2009, other real estate owned included the fair market value
of property that had been purchased as a potential branch site in 2000. In 2006, the property was
reclassified to other real estate owned from premises and equipment and a $222 charge to operations
was recorded to write-down the book value of the property to its fair market value of $488 as a
result of managements decision to sell the property rather than build a branch at the site. An
additional $212 charge to operations was recorded in 2009 to write-down the book value of the
property to its fair market value as of December 31, 2009 of $276. No additional adjustments to
the propertys fair market value were recorded during the year ended December 31, 2010.
At December 31, 2010 and 2009, other foreclosed assets, which are included in other assets, totaled
$207 and $267, respectively. Net gains on the sales of other foreclosed assets of $13 and $12 were
recognized for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. Net losses on the sales
of other foreclosed assets of $25 were recognized for the year ended December 31, 2008.
NOTE 9 Deposits
Deposits by major type consisted of the following at the dates indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noninterest-bearing demand |
|
$ |
74,583 |
|
|
$ |
75,628 |
|
Interest-bearing demand |
|
|
75,550 |
|
|
|
201,950 |
|
Savings |
|
|
207,264 |
|
|
|
203,110 |
|
Money market |
|
|
100,798 |
|
|
|
95,463 |
|
Certificates of deposit |
|
|
342,963 |
|
|
|
333,815 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deposits |
|
$ |
801,158 |
|
|
$ |
909,966 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
106
OmniAmerican Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiary
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(Dollars in thousands)
At December 31, 2010 and 2009, overdrawn deposit accounts totaling $221 and $212, respectively,
have been reclassified as loans on the consolidated balance sheets.
The following table summarizes the interest expense incurred on the deposits by major type for the
years ended December 31, 2010, 2009, and 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-bearing demand |
|
$ |
265 |
|
|
$ |
268 |
|
|
$ |
367 |
|
Savings |
|
|
1,032 |
|
|
|
1,344 |
|
|
|
2,119 |
|
Money market |
|
|
836 |
|
|
|
970 |
|
|
|
1,608 |
|
Certificates of deposit |
|
|
7,302 |
|
|
|
10,189 |
|
|
|
14,011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest expense on deposits |
|
$ |
9,435 |
|
|
$ |
12,771 |
|
|
$ |
18,105 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Certificates of deposit in excess of $100 were $122,162 and $109,291 at December 31, 2010 and 2009,
respectively. Generally, deposits greater than $250 are not federally insured.
The remaining maturity on certificates of deposit at December 31, 2010 is presented below:
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011 |
|
$ |
194,077 |
|
2012 |
|
|
62,417 |
|
2013 |
|
|
60,423 |
|
2014 |
|
|
7,227 |
|
2015 |
|
|
18,767 |
|
Thereafter |
|
|
52 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
342,963 |
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2010 and 2009, brokered time deposits totaled $884 and $883, respectively.
NOTE 10 Borrowed Funds
The Company has a line of credit with the FHLB of Dallas which allows it to borrow on a
collateralized basis at a fixed term with pledged assignments. At December 31, 2010, advances from
the FHLB of Dallas totaled $41,000 and had fixed interest rates ranging from 2.83% to 4.28% with a
weighted average rate of 3.62%. At December 31, 2009, advances from the FHLB of Dallas totaled
$66,400 and had fixed interest rates ranging from 2.58% to 4.43% with a weighted average rate of
3.54%. The borrowings are collateralized by a blanket floating lien on all first mortgage loans,
mortgage-backed securities, the FHLB capital stock owned by the Company, and any funds on deposit
with FHLB. At December 31, 2010 and 2009, the borrowing limit was $435,937 and $333,091,
respectively. In addition, investment securities with an amortized cost of $242,514 and $130,374
were pledged to secure the advances at December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively.
107
OmniAmerican Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiary
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(Dollars in thousands)
At December 31, 2010, the Company had FHLB advances outstanding which mature on the dates indicated
as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011 |
|
$ |
19,000 |
|
2012 |
|
|
15,000 |
|
2013 |
|
|
|
|
2014 |
|
|
|
|
2015 |
|
|
7,000 |
|
Thereafter |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
41,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
The Company entered into a sale of securities under agreement to repurchase (repurchase
agreement) with PNC Bank, N.A. (PNC) on July 24, 2007. The agreement is structured as the sale
of a specified amount of identified securities to PNC which the Company has agreed to repurchase
five years after the initial sale. The repurchase agreement is treated as a financing and the
obligation to repurchase securities sold is included in other secured borrowings in the
consolidated balance sheets. The underlying securities continue to be carried as assets of the
Company and the Company is entitled to receive interest and principal payments on the underlying
securities. At December 31, 2010 and 2009, the Company had $58,000 and $58,000 in repurchase
agreements outstanding, respectively. These repurchase agreements were secured by investment
securities with a fair value of $66,207 and $67,291 at December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively.
Additionally, the Company maintains $27,500 in federal funds lines with other financial
institutions.
In 2009, the Company established a line of credit with the Federal Reserve Bank. As of December
31, 2010, $24,092 of commercial loans and $149,888 of consumer loans were pledged as collateral.
At December 31, 2010, the available line of credit was $173,980. The Bank has never drawn on this
line of credit.
108
OmniAmerican Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiary
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(Dollars in thousands)
Information relating to the FHLB advances and other borrowings as of or for the years ended
December 31, 2010 and 2009 is summarized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending Balance: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FHLB advances |
|
$ |
41,000 |
|
|
$ |
66,400 |
|
Other secured borrowings |
|
|
58,000 |
|
|
|
58,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maximum Balance: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FHLB advances |
|
|
66,400 |
|
|
|
159,900 |
|
Other secured borrowings |
|
|
58,075 |
|
|
|
58,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average Balance: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FHLB advances |
|
|
54,009 |
|
|
|
117,547 |
|
Other secured borrowings |
|
|
58,195 |
|
|
|
58,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average interest rate: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During the period: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FHLB advances |
|
|
3.72 |
% |
|
|
4.05 |
% |
Other secured borrowings |
|
|
4.22 |
% |
|
|
3.68 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
End of period: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FHLB advances |
|
|
3.62 |
% |
|
|
3.54 |
% |
Other secured borrowings |
|
|
5.00 |
% |
|
|
3.52 |
% |
NOTE 11 Employee Benefit Plans
Pension Plan
The Company sponsors a defined benefit pension plan (the Pension Plan) for the benefit of its
employees. The Pension Plan originally called for benefits to be paid to eligible employees at
retirement based primarily upon years of service with the Company and compensation levels at
retirement. On November 15, 2006, the Company announced that it would freeze benefits under the
Pension Plan effective December 31, 2006, so that no further benefits will be earned by employees
after that date. In addition, no new participants may be added to the Pension Plan after December
31, 2006.
109
OmniAmerican Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiary
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(Dollars in thousands)
Changes in the plan benefit obligation using a December 31 measurement date for the years ended
December 31, 2010 and 2009 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Projected benefit obligation as of January 1, |
|
$ |
3,991 |
|
|
$ |
4,697 |
|
Interest cost |
|
|
238 |
|
|
|
276 |
|
Actuarial loss |
|
|
89 |
|
|
|
28 |
|
Benefits paid |
|
|
(143 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Effect of settlement |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,010 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Projected benefit obligation at December 31, |
|
$ |
4,175 |
|
|
$ |
3,991 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated benefit obligation at December
31, |
|
$ |
4,175 |
|
|
$ |
3,991 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in plan assets for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of plan assets as of January 1, |
|
$ |
3,017 |
|
|
$ |
3,562 |
|
Actual return on plan assets |
|
|
576 |
|
|
|
349 |
|
Employer contributions |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
116 |
|
Benefits paid |
|
|
(143 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Effect of settlement |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,010 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of plan assets as of December 31, |
|
$ |
3,455 |
|
|
$ |
3,017 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funded status as of December 31, |
|
$ |
(720 |
) |
|
$ |
(974 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2010 and 2009, the funded status is recognized in accrued expenses and other
liabilities in the consolidated balance sheets.
The net periodic pension cost for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009, and 2008 includes the
following components:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Interest cost on projected benefit obligation |
|
$ |
238 |
|
|
$ |
276 |
|
|
$ |
295 |
|
Expected return on assets |
|
|
(192 |
) |
|
|
(223 |
) |
|
|
(431 |
) |
Amortization of net loss |
|
|
77 |
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
45 |
|
Effect of settlement recognition |
|
|
|
|
|
|
550 |
|
|
|
483 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net periodic pension cost |
|
$ |
123 |
|
|
$ |
703 |
|
|
$ |
392 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
110
OmniAmerican Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiary
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(Dollars in thousands)
Amounts related to the Companys defined benefit pension plan recognized as a component of other
comprehensive income (loss) were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net actuarial gain (loss) |
|
$ |
295 |
|
|
$ |
98 |
|
|
$ |
(1,657 |
) |
Amortization of net loss |
|
|
77 |
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
45 |
|
Effect of settlement recognition |
|
|
|
|
|
|
550 |
|
|
|
483 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total recognized in other comprehensive income (loss) |
|
|
372 |
|
|
|
748 |
|
|
|
(1,129 |
) |
Deferred tax (expense) benefit |
|
|
(126 |
) |
|
|
(254 |
) |
|
|
384 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax |
|
$ |
246 |
|
|
$ |
494 |
|
|
$ |
(745 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amounts recognized as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) as of year-end
that have not been recognized as a component of the combined net period benefit cost of the
Companys defined benefit pension plan are presented in the following table. The Company expects
to recognize approximately $65 of the net actuarial loss reported in the following table as of
December 31, 2010 as a component of the net periodic benefit cost during 2011.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net actuarial loss |
|
$ |
(1,800 |
) |
|
$ |
(2,172 |
) |
Deferred tax benefit |
|
|
612 |
|
|
|
738 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amounts included in other comprehensive
loss, net of tax |
|
$ |
(1,188 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,434 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assumptions used in accounting for the Pension Plan are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Discount rate |
|
|
6.00 |
% |
|
|
6.00 |
% |
|
|
5.50 |
% |
Expected long-term rate of return on assets |
|
|
6.50 |
% |
|
|
6.50 |
% |
|
|
7.50 |
% |
Rate of increase in future compensation |
|
|
0.00 |
% |
|
|
0.00 |
% |
|
|
0.00 |
% |
Historical and future expected returns of multiple asset classes were analyzed to develop a
risk-free real rate of return and risk premiums for each asset class. The overall rate for each
asset class was developed by combining a long-term inflation component, the risk-free real rate of
return, and the associated risk premium. A weighted average rate was developed based on those
overall rates and the target asset allocation of the plan.
111
OmniAmerican Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiary
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(Dollars in thousands)
The Companys current pension plan target allocations and the weighted-average asset allocations as
of December 31, 2010 and 2009 by asset category are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Target |
|
|
Actual Allocations |
|
|
|
Allocations |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity securities |
|
|
40 |
% |
|
|
82 |
% |
|
|
35 |
% |
Debt securities |
|
|
60 |
% |
|
|
18 |
% |
|
|
65 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The assets of the defined benefit pension plan are invested in domestic and international equity
securities, fixed income securities, and real estate securities funds. The plans investment
policy includes guidelines and procedures designed to ensure assets are invested in a manner
necessary to meet expected future benefits earned by participants. The investment guidelines
consider a broad range of economic conditions. The objective is to maintain investment portfolios
that limit risk through prudent asset allocation parameters, achieve asset returns that meet or
exceed the plans actuarial assumptions, and achieve asset returns that are competitive with like
institutions employing similar investment strategies. The Company periodically reviews the
investment policy. The policy is established and administered in a manner so as to comply at all
times with applicable government regulations.
The major categories of assets in the Companys defined benefit pension plan as of December 31,
2010 and 2009 are presented in the following table. Assets are segregated by the level of the
valuation inputs within the fair value hierarchy established by ASC Topic 820, Fair Value
Measurements and Disclosures, utilized to measure fair value (see Note 15 Fair Value
Measurements).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Level 1: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mutual funds |
|
$ |
1,961 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Level 2: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pooled separate accounts |
|
|
1,494 |
|
|
|
3,017 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets at fair value |
|
$ |
3,455 |
|
|
$ |
3,017 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company made contributions to
the pension plan of $5 and $116 during the years ended December
31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. The Company expects to make additional contributions of $3 to the
plan in fiscal year 2011.
112
OmniAmerican Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiary
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(Dollars in thousands)
As of December 31, 2010, the pension benefit payments were expected to be paid as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011 |
|
$ |
20 |
|
2012 |
|
|
44 |
|
2013 |
|
|
110 |
|
2014 |
|
|
270 |
|
2015 |
|
|
160 |
|
Years 2016 2020 |
|
|
940 |
|
401(k) Plan
The Company also has a discretionary defined contribution savings plan (the Savings Plan). The
Savings Plan is qualified under Sections 401 and 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code and allows
employees to contribute a portion of their salary on a pretax basis into the Savings Plan. The
Company matches a portion of employees contributions. Matching contributions made by the Company
are accrued and funded on a current basis. During the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009, and
2008, the Company contributed approximately $591, $617, and $616 to the Savings Plan, respectively,
which is included in salaries and benefits expense in the accompanying consolidated statements of
income.
Deferred Compensation
The Company has entered into deferred compensation agreements with certain executives that provide
benefits payable based on specified terms of the agreements. A portion of the benefits is subject
to forfeiture if the employee willfully leaves employment or employment is terminated for cause as
defined in the agreements. The accrued liability for these agreements as of December 31, 2010 and
2009 was $165 and $156, respectively. Deferred compensation expense related to these agreements
was $165, $156, and $266 for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009, and 2008, respectively.
Employee Stock Ownership Plan
In connection with the initial public offering, OmniAmerican Bank adopted an Employee Stock
Ownership Plan effective January 1, 2010. The ESOP enables all eligible employees of the Bank to
share in the growth of the Company through the acquisition of stock. Employees are generally
eligible to participate in the ESOP after completion of one year of service and attaining age 21.
The ESOP purchased eight percent of the shares offered in the initial public offering of the
Company (952,200 shares). This purchase was facilitated by a note payable to the Company from the
ESOP in the amount of $9,522. The note is secured by a pledge of the ESOP shares. The shares
pledged as collateral are reported as unallocated ESOP shares in the accompanying consolidated
balance sheets. The corresponding note is to be paid back in 25 approximately equal annual
payments of $561 on the last day of each fiscal year, beginning December 31, 2010, including
interest at an adjustable rate equal to the Wall Street Journal prime rate (3.25% as of December
31, 2010). The note payable and the corresponding note receivable have been eliminated for
consolidation purposes.
113
OmniAmerican Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiary
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(Dollars in thousands)
The Company may make discretionary contributions to the ESOP in the form of debt service.
Dividends received on the unallocated ESOP shares are utilized to service the debt. Shares are
released for allocation to plan participants based on principal and interest payments of the note.
Compensation expense is recognized based on the number of shares allocated to plan participants
each year and the average market price of the stock for the current year. Released ESOP shares
become outstanding for earnings per share computations.
As compensation expense is incurred, the unallocated ESOP shares account is reduced based on the
original cost of the stock. The difference between the cost and average market price of shares
released for allocation is applied to additional paid-in capital. Compensation expense recognized
from the release of shares from the ESOP was $444 for the year ended December 31, 2010.
The ESOP shares as of December 31, 2010 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Allocated shares |
|
|
38,088 |
|
Unearned shares |
|
|
914,112 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total ESOP shares |
|
|
952,200 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of unearned shares |
|
$ |
12,386 |
|
NOTE 12 Regulatory Matters
The Company is subject to regulation and examination by the Office of Thrift Supervision (OTS),
its primary regulator. The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) also has regulatory and
examination authority with respect to the Company. The deposits of the Company are insured by the
FDIC.
In January 2008, the Bank incurred a breach of its ATM/debit card system. According to the OTS,
this breach of the Banks data systems indicated deficiencies in the Banks monitoring of its
information technology and customer information security. In response to its findings, the OTS
issued a Cease and Desist Order (the Order) relative to the Banks customer information security
programs. The Banks Board of Directors executed a Stipulation and Consent to the Order. In
response to the terms of the Order, and with the assistance of qualified consultants, the Bank
prepared and received OTS approval of an information technology security remediation and action
plan. This plan addressed, among other things, any identified security deficiencies,
implementation of processes to detect intrusions and compliance with all applicable regulatory
guidelines as set forth by the OTS. As of October 23, 2008, the Bank had completed its performance
of all requirements of the Order. The OTS conducted an information technology examination in April
2009 and found that the Bank had taken the required steps to address the weaknesses that had
allowed the breach of its ATM/debit card system to occur. As a result of the findings of the
examination, the OTS terminated the Order on June 11, 2009.
The Company is subject to various regulatory capital requirements administered by the federal
banking agencies. Bank regulatory authorities have established risk-based capital guidelines for
U.S. banking organizations. The objective of these efforts is to provide a more consistent system
for comparing capital positions of banking organizations and to reflect the level of risk
associated with holding various categories of assets. The guidelines define Tier 1 capital and
Tier 2 capital. The components of Tier 1 capital for the Company include stockholders equity
excluding unrealized gains and losses on available for sale securities and other intangible assets.
Tier 2 capital includes a portion of the allowance for loan losses. These two components combine
to become Total Capital. The guidelines also stipulate that four categories of risk weights (0,
20, 50 and 100 percent), primarily based on the relative credit risk of the counterparty, be
applied to the different types of balance sheet assets. Risk weights for all off-balance sheet
exposures are determined by a two step process, whereas the face value of the off-balance sheet
item is converted to a credit equivalent amount and that amount is assigned to the appropriate
risk category. Off-balance sheet items at December 31, 2010 and 2009 included unfunded loan
commitments and letters of credit. The minimum ratio for qualifying Total Capital is 8.0%, of
which 4.0% must be Tier 1 capital.
114
OmniAmerican Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiary
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(Dollars in thousands)
In addition to the minimum guidelines stated above, the regulatory authorities have established
minimums for an institution to be classified as well capitalized. A financial institution is
deemed to be well capitalized if the institution has a total risk-based capital ratio of 10.0% or
greater, a Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio of 6.0% or greater and a Tier 1 leverage ratio of 5.0%
or greater and the institution is not subject to an order, written agreement, capital directive or
prompt corrective action directive to meet and maintain a specific capital level for any capital
measure.
The table below presents the capital required as a percentage of total and risk-weighted assets and
the percentage and the total amount of capital maintained for OmniAmerican Bancorp, Inc. and
OmniAmerican Bank at December 31, 2010 and for OmniAmerican Bank at December 31, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minimum |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
To Be Well |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minimum |
|
|
Capitalized Under |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For Capital |
|
|
Prompt Corrective |
|
|
|
Actual |
|
|
Adequacy Purposes |
|
|
Action Provisions |
|
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Ratio |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Ratio |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Ratio |
|
Consolidated as of December 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total risk-based capital to risk-weighted
assets |
|
$ |
198,366 |
|
|
|
27.86 |
% |
|
$ |
56,958 |
|
|
|
8.00 |
% |
|
$ |
71,197 |
|
|
|
10.00 |
% |
Tier I risk-based capital to risk-weighted
assets |
|
|
191,743 |
|
|
|
26.93 |
% |
|
|
28,479 |
|
|
|
4.00 |
% |
|
|
42,718 |
|
|
|
6.00 |
% |
Tier I (Core) capital to adjusted total assets |
|
|
191,743 |
|
|
|
17.40 |
% |
|
|
44,078 |
|
|
|
4.00 |
% |
|
|
55,097 |
|
|
|
5.00 |
% |
OmniAmerican Bank as of December 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total risk-based capital to risk-weighted
assets |
|
$ |
170,526 |
|
|
|
23.95 |
% |
|
$ |
56,965 |
|
|
|
8.00 |
% |
|
$ |
71,207 |
|
|
|
10.00 |
% |
Tier I risk-based capital to risk-weighted
assets |
|
|
163,903 |
|
|
|
23.02 |
% |
|
|
28,483 |
|
|
|
4.00 |
% |
|
|
42,724 |
|
|
|
6.00 |
% |
Tier I (Core) capital to adjusted total assets |
|
|
163,903 |
|
|
|
14.88 |
% |
|
|
44,065 |
|
|
|
4.00 |
% |
|
|
55,082 |
|
|
|
5.00 |
% |
OmniAmerican Bank as of December 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total risk-based capital to risk-weighted
assets |
|
$ |
90,372 |
|
|
|
12.03 |
% |
|
$ |
60,097 |
|
|
|
8.00 |
% |
|
$ |
75,122 |
|
|
|
10.00 |
% |
Tier I risk-based capital to risk-weighted
assets |
|
|
82,731 |
|
|
|
11.01 |
% |
|
|
30,049 |
|
|
|
4.00 |
% |
|
|
45,073 |
|
|
|
6.00 |
% |
Tier I (Core) capital to adjusted total assets |
|
|
82,731 |
|
|
|
7.35 |
% |
|
|
45,022 |
|
|
|
4.00 |
% |
|
|
56,277 |
|
|
|
5.00 |
% |
The Home Owners Loan Act (HOLA), as amended, requires savings institutions to meet a
Qualified Thrift Lender (QTL) test. The QTL test requires at least 65% of assets be maintained
in housing-related finance and other specified areas. An institution must be in compliance with
the QTL test on a monthly basis in nine out of every 12 months. If this requirement is not met,
limits are placed on growth, branching, new investments, FHLB advances, and dividends or the
Company must convert to a commercial bank charter. At December 31, 2010 and 2009, QTL was
calculated as 88.2% and 83.0% respectively, and the Company has met the test in each month of the
years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009.
115
OmniAmerican Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiary
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(Dollars in thousands)
The following is a reconciliation of the Companys equity under accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States of America to regulatory capital (as defined by the OTS and FDIC) as
of December 31, 2010 and 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated GAAP equity |
|
$ |
198,627 |
|
|
$ |
91,156 |
|
Consolidated equity in excess of Bank equity |
|
|
(28,194 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bank GAAP equity |
|
|
170,433 |
|
|
|
91,156 |
|
Deferred tax assets disallowed for regulatory capital |
|
|
(6,563 |
) |
|
|
(7,824 |
) |
Unrealized gain on securities available for sale |
|
|
(1,155 |
) |
|
|
(2,035 |
) |
Unrealized loss on pension plan |
|
|
1,188 |
|
|
|
1,434 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tier I capital |
|
|
163,903 |
|
|
|
82,731 |
|
General allowance for loan losses |
|
|
6,623 |
|
|
|
7,641 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total regulatory capital |
|
$ |
170,526 |
|
|
$ |
90,372 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOTE 13 Income Taxes
The current and deferred portions of net income tax expense included in the consolidated statements
of income are presented below for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009, and 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Current |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal |
|
$ |
(51 |
) |
|
$ |
51 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
State |
|
|
(570 |
) |
|
|
553 |
|
|
|
409 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current taxes |
|
|
(621 |
) |
|
|
604 |
|
|
|
409 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal |
|
|
906 |
|
|
|
288 |
|
|
|
333 |
|
State |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred taxes |
|
|
906 |
|
|
|
288 |
|
|
|
333 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total income taxes |
|
$ |
285 |
|
|
$ |
892 |
|
|
$ |
742 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, the Company did not incur any interest or
penalties on income taxes. The Company will record interest and penalties on income taxes, if any,
when they are incurred in noninterest expense.
The Company was a credit union prior to 2006 and was not subject to federal or state income taxes.
The Company became a taxable entity effective January 1, 2006 in conjunction with its charter
conversion. As a result of the change in tax status, the Company recorded a net deferred tax asset
on January 1, 2006 in the amount of $6,107. The net deferred tax asset consisted of a tax benefit
of $4,541 as a result of timing differences for certain items such as depreciation of premises and
equipment and allowance for loans losses and $1,566 for the tax effect of the changes in the fair
value of securities available for sale. The Companys pretax income is subject to federal income
taxes at a combined rate of 34%.
116
OmniAmerican Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiary
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(Dollars in thousands)
At December 31, 2010 and 2009, the net deferred tax asset consisted of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan losses |
|
$ |
2,538 |
|
|
$ |
2,376 |
|
Premises and equipment |
|
|
1,354 |
|
|
|
1,827 |
|
Net operating loss |
|
|
2,779 |
|
|
|
3,231 |
|
Deferred compensation |
|
|
183 |
|
|
|
202 |
|
Pension plan |
|
|
612 |
|
|
|
738 |
|
Other real estate owned |
|
|
110 |
|
|
|
91 |
|
Interest on non-accrual loans |
|
|
183 |
|
|
|
75 |
|
Accrued expenses |
|
|
163 |
|
|
|
356 |
|
Other |
|
|
90 |
|
|
|
137 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,012 |
|
|
|
9,033 |
|
Deferred tax liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Servicing rights |
|
|
(422 |
) |
|
|
(397 |
) |
Securities available for sale |
|
|
(595 |
) |
|
|
(1,048 |
) |
FHLB stock |
|
|
(60 |
) |
|
|
(74 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,077 |
) |
|
|
(1,519 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred tax asset |
|
$ |
6,935 |
|
|
$ |
7,514 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
No valuation allowance has been provided on deferred tax assets as of December 31, 2010 or 2009.
In assessing the realization of deferred tax assets, management considers whether it is more likely
than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. The ultimate
realization of deferred tax assets is dependent on the generation of future taxable income during
the periods in which those temporary differences become deductible. Management considers the
projected future taxable income and tax planning strategies in making this assessment. Based upon
the level of historical income and projections for future taxable income over the periods in which
the deferred tax assets are deductible, management believes it is more likely than not the Company
will realize all benefits related to these deductible temporary differences.
For the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009, and 2008, the effective tax rate differs from the
federal statutory rate of 34% applied to income before income taxes due to the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal statutory rate times financial
statement income |
|
$ |
660 |
|
|
$ |
526 |
|
|
$ |
471 |
|
Effect of: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
State taxes, net of federal benefit |
|
|
(376 |
) |
|
|
367 |
|
|
|
270 |
|
Nontaxable income |
|
|
(37 |
) |
|
|
(38 |
) |
|
|
(16 |
) |
Non-deductible expenses |
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total income tax expense |
|
$ |
285 |
|
|
$ |
892 |
|
|
$ |
742 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effective tax rate |
|
|
14.7 |
% |
|
|
57.7 |
% |
|
|
53.5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2010, the Company had net operating loss carryforwards of approximately $8,175
which begin to expire in 2026. These net operating loss carryforwards may be used to offset future
income taxes payable, however the Company may be subject to alternative minimum tax. The
realization of the net operating loss carryforwards is dependent on future taxable income.
117
OmniAmerican Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiary
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(Dollars in thousands)
NOTE 14 Related Party Transactions
The Company has made loans in the ordinary course of business with certain of its executive
officers, directors and their affiliates. All loans included in such transactions are made on
substantially the same terms, including interest rate and collateral, as those prevailing at the
time for comparable transactions with other persons and all loans are current as to principal and
interest payments. Loans to executive officers, directors, and their affiliates were as follows
for the year ended December 31, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of year |
|
$ |
2,421 |
|
New loans |
|
|
1,314 |
|
Effect of changes in composition of related parties |
|
|
(312 |
) |
Repayments |
|
|
(1,125 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of year |
|
$ |
2,298 |
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits from executive officers, directors, and their affiliates were $2,368 and $1,639 at
December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively.
NOTE 15 Fair Value Measurements
ASC Topic 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures, establishes a fair value hierarchy which
requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable
inputs when measuring fair value. The standard describes three levels of inputs that may be used
to measure fair value:
|
|
|
Level 1 Inputs - Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical
assets or liabilities that the reporting entity has the ability to access at the measurement
date. |
|
|
|
Level 2 Inputs - Inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1 that are
observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. These might include
quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets, quoted prices for
identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active, inputs other than
quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability (such as interest rates,
volatilities, prepayment speeds, credit risks, etc.) or inputs that are derived principally
from or corroborated by market data by correlation or other means. |
|
|
|
Level 3 Inputs - Unobservable inputs for determining the fair values of assets
or liabilities that reflect an entitys own assumptions about the assumptions that market
participants would use in pricing the assets or liabilities. |
A description of the valuation methodologies used for assets measured at fair value on a recurring
basis, as well as the general classification of such assets pursuant to the fair value hierarchy,
is set forth below.
118
OmniAmerican Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiary
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(Dollars in thousands)
Securities available for sale are valued at fair value on a recurring basis. The fair values of
securities available for sale is determined by obtaining quoted prices on nationally recognized
securities exchanges (Level 1 inputs) or matrix pricing, which is a mathematical technique widely
used in the industry to value debt securities without relying exclusively on quoted prices for the
specific securities but rather by relying on the securities relationship to other benchmark quoted
securities (Level 2 inputs). The Level 3 investments consisted of trust preferred securities which
are issued by financial institutions and insurance companies. The decline in the level of
observable inputs and market activity in this class of investments by the measurement date has been
significant and resulted in unreliable external pricing. Broker pricing and bid/ask spreads, when
available, vary widely. There are currently very few market participants who are willing and/or
able to transact for these securities. The fair value of these securities was determined using a
discounted cash flow model that incorporates assumptions regarding defaults on the underlying
collateral.
In accordance with ASC Topic 820, certain financial assets and financial liabilities are measured
at fair value on a nonrecurring basis; that is, the assets and liabilities are not measured at fair
value on an ongoing basis but are subject to fair value adjustments in certain circumstances (for
example, when there is evidence of impairment). Financial assets or liabilities required to be
measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis include impaired loans and mortgage servicing
rights. Nonfinancial assets or liabilities required to be measured at fair value on a nonrecurring
basis include other real estate owned.
Impaired loans (loans which are not expected to repay all principal and interest amounts due in
accordance with the original contractual terms) are measured at an observable market price (if
available) or at the fair value of the loans collateral (if collateral dependent). Fair value of
the loans collateral is determined by appraisals or independent valuation which is then adjusted
for the estimated costs related to liquidation of the collateral. Managements ongoing review of
appraisal information may result in additional discounts or adjustments to valuation based upon
more recent market sales activity or more current appraisal information derived from properties of
similar type and/or locale. A significant portion of the Banks impaired loans are measured using the estimated fair market value of the collateral
less the estimated costs to sell. Therefore, the Company has categorized its impaired loans as
Level 3.
Mortgage servicing rights are carried at the lower of cost or estimated fair value. The estimated
fair values of mortgage servicing rights are obtained through independent third-party valuations
through an analysis of cash flows, incorporating estimates of assumptions market participants would
use in determining fair value, including market discount rates, prepayment speeds, servicing
income, servicing costs, default rates, and other market-driven data, including the markets
perception of future interest rate movements and, as such, are classified as Level 3.
Other real estate owned is carried at the lower of cost or fair value less estimated selling costs.
Fair value is estimated through current appraisals, real estate brokers or listing prices. As
these properties are actively marketed, estimated fair values may be adjusted by management to
reflect current economic and market conditions and, as such, are classified as Level 3.
119
OmniAmerican Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiary
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(Dollars in thousands)
Assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring and nonrecurring basis are summarized
below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2010, Using |
|
|
Total Fair Value at |
|
|
|
Level 1 Inputs |
|
|
Level 2 Inputs |
|
|
Level 3 Inputs |
|
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Measured on a recurring basis: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. government sponsored mortgage-back securities |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
154,614 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
154,614 |
|
U.S. government sponsored collateralized mortgage obligations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
150,792 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
150,792 |
|
Private-label collateralized mortgage obligations (residential) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,396 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,396 |
|
Trust preferred securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,920 |
|
|
|
3,920 |
|
Other equity securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,084 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,084 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Measured on a nonrecurring basis: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impaired loans |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
13,340 |
|
|
$ |
13,340 |
|
Mortgage servicing rights |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,242 |
|
|
|
1,242 |
|
Other real estate owned |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,793 |
|
|
|
14,793 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2009, Using |
|
|
Total Fair Value at |
|
|
|
Level 1 Inputs |
|
|
Level 2 Inputs |
|
|
Level 3 Inputs |
|
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Measured on a recurring basis: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. government sponsored mortgage-back securities |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
134,967 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
134,967 |
|
U.S. government sponsored collateralized mortgage obligations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
55,148 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
55,148 |
|
Private-label collateralized mortgage obligations (residential) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,075 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,075 |
|
Trust preferred securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,604 |
|
|
|
5,604 |
|
Municipal obligations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,595 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,595 |
|
Other equity securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,032 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,032 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Measured on a nonrecurring basis: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impaired loans |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
5,874 |
|
|
$ |
5,874 |
|
Mortgage servicing rights |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,168 |
|
|
|
1,168 |
|
Other real estate owned |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,762 |
|
|
|
6,762 |
|
120
OmniAmerican Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiary
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(Dollars in thousands)
The table below presents a reconciliation and income statement classification of gains and
losses for all assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis using significant unobservable
inputs (Level 3) for the year ended December 31, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities |
|
|
|
available for sale |
|
Beginning balance, January 1, 2010 |
|
$ |
5,604 |
|
Total gains or losses (realized / unrealized) |
|
|
|
|
Included in earnings: |
|
|
|
|
Interest income on securities |
|
|
20 |
|
Total gains or losses included in other comprehensive income |
|
|
(1,614 |
) |
Purchases, issuances, and settlements |
|
|
(90 |
) |
Transfers into Level 3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance, December 31, 2010 |
|
$ |
3,920 |
|
|
|
|
|
The table below presents a reconciliation and income statement classification of gains and losses
for all assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis using significant unobservable inputs
(Level 3) for the year ended December 31, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities |
|
|
|
available for sale |
|
Beginning balance, January 1, 2009 |
|
$ |
6,275 |
|
Total gains or losses (realized / unrealized) |
|
|
|
|
Included in earnings: |
|
|
|
|
Interest income on securities |
|
|
18 |
|
Included in other comprehensive income |
|
|
(626 |
) |
Purchases, issuances, and settlements |
|
|
(63 |
) |
Transfers into Level 3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance, December 31, 2009 |
|
$ |
5,604 |
|
|
|
|
|
No changes in unrealized gains or losses were recorded through earnings for the years ended
December 31, 2010 and 2009 for the assets measured using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3
Inputs).
ASC Topic 825, Financial Instruments, requires disclosure of the fair value of financial assets
and financial liabilities, including those financial assets and financial liabilities that are not
measured and reported at fair value on a recurring basis or non-recurring basis.
The methodologies for estimating the fair value of financial assets and financial liabilities that
are measured at fair value on a recurring or non-recurring basis are discussed above. The
methodologies for the other financial assets and financial liabilities are discussed below:
Cash and cash equivalents: The carrying amounts for cash and cash equivalents approximate fair
values.
Accrued interest receivable and payable: The carrying amounts for accrued interest receivable
and payable approximate fair values.
121
OmniAmerican Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiary
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(Dollars in thousands)
Other investments: The carrying amount for other investments, which consist primarily of
Federal Home Loan Bank stock, approximates fair values.
Loans: The estimated fair value for all fixed rate loans is determined by discounting the
estimated cash flows using the current rate at which similar loans would be made to borrowers
with similar credit ratings and maturities. The estimated fair value for variable rate loans is
the carrying amount. The impact of delinquent loans on the estimation of the fair values
described above is not considered to have a material effect and, accordingly, delinquent loans
have been disregarded in the valuation methodologies employed.
Deposits: The estimated fair value of demand deposit accounts is the carrying amount. The fair
value of fixed-maturity certificates is estimated by discounting the estimated cash flows using
the current rate at which similar certificates would be issued.
Borrowed Funds: The estimated fair value for borrowed funds is determined by discounting the
estimated cash flows using the current rate at which similar borrowings would be made with
similar ratings and maturities.
Off-balance sheet financial instruments: The fair values for the Companys off-balance sheet
commitments are estimated based on fees charged to others to enter into similar agreements
taking into account the remaining terms of the agreements and credit standing of the members.
The estimated fair value of these commitments is not significant.
The carrying amount and estimated fair value of the Companys financial instruments at December 31,
2010 and 2009 are summarized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Value |
|
Financial assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
24,597 |
|
|
$ |
24,597 |
|
|
$ |
140,144 |
|
|
$ |
140,144 |
|
Securities available for sale |
|
|
317,806 |
|
|
|
317,806 |
|
|
|
210,421 |
|
|
|
210,421 |
|
Other investments |
|
|
3,060 |
|
|
|
3,060 |
|
|
|
3,850 |
|
|
|
3,850 |
|
Loans held for sale |
|
|
861 |
|
|
|
861 |
|
|
|
241 |
|
|
|
241 |
|
Loans, net |
|
|
660,425 |
|
|
|
675,641 |
|
|
|
698,127 |
|
|
|
707,198 |
|
Mortgage servicing rights |
|
|
1,242 |
|
|
|
1,242 |
|
|
|
1,168 |
|
|
|
1,168 |
|
Accrued interest receivable |
|
|
3,469 |
|
|
|
3,469 |
|
|
|
3,523 |
|
|
|
3,523 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits |
|
$ |
801,158 |
|
|
$ |
804,998 |
|
|
$ |
909,966 |
|
|
$ |
913,903 |
|
Federal Home Loan Bank advances |
|
|
41,000 |
|
|
|
42,244 |
|
|
|
66,400 |
|
|
|
68,182 |
|
Other secured borrowings |
|
|
58,000 |
|
|
|
61,125 |
|
|
|
58,000 |
|
|
|
62,037 |
|
Accrued interest payable |
|
|
930 |
|
|
|
930 |
|
|
|
852 |
|
|
|
852 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-balance sheet financial instruments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loan commitments |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Letters of credit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
122
OmniAmerican Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiary
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(Dollars in thousands)
NOTE 16 Financial Instruments with Off-Balance Sheet Risk
The Company is a party to financial instruments with off-balance sheet risk in the normal course of
business to meet the financing needs of its customers. These financial instruments include loan
commitments, standby letters of credit, and documentary letters of credit. The instruments
involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit and interest rate risk in excess of the amount
recognized in the financial statements.
The Companys exposure to credit loss in the event of non-performance by the other party of these
loan commitments and standby letters of credit is represented by the contractual amount of those
instruments. The Company uses the same credit policies in making commitments and conditional
obligations as it does for on-balance sheet instruments.
Outstanding commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit are summarized as follows at
December 31, 2010 and 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments to extend credit |
|
$ |
23,632 |
|
|
$ |
27,619 |
|
Standby letters of credit |
|
|
315 |
|
|
|
1,097 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
23,947 |
|
|
$ |
28,716 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2010 and 2009, commitments to fund fixed rate loans of $1,650 and $3,453,
respectively, were included in the outstanding commitments to extend credit. The interest rates on
these commitments to fund fixed rate loans ranged from 3.25% to 12.99% at December 31, 2010 and
2009.
Loan commitments are agreements to lend to a customer as long as there is no customer violation of
any condition established in the contract. Commitments generally have fixed expiration dates or
other termination clauses and may require payment of a fee. Standby letters of credit are
conditional commitments by the Company to guarantee the performance of a customer to a third party.
The credit risk involved in issuing letters of credit is essentially the same as that involved in
extending loan facilities to customers.
Since many of the loan commitments and letters of credit may expire without being drawn upon, the
total commitment amount does not necessarily represent future cash requirements. The Company
evaluates each customers creditworthiness on a case-by-case basis. The amount of collateral
obtained, if deemed necessary by the Company upon extension of credit, is based on managements
credit evaluation of the counterparty. Collateral held varies but may include accounts receivable,
inventory, property, plant and equipment, owner-occupied real estate, and income-producing
commercial properties.
NOTE 17 Litigation
The Company is involved in legal actions arising in the ordinary course of business. It is the
opinion of management, after reviewing such actions with outside legal counsel, that the settlement
of these matters will not materially affect the Companys financial position, results of operations
or cash flows.
123
OmniAmerican Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiary
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(Dollars in thousands)
NOTE 18 Parent Company Only Condensed Financial Information
Condensed financial information of OmniAmerican Bancorp, Inc. follows:
Condensed Balance Sheet
December 31, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash on deposit at subsidiary |
|
$ |
18,683 |
|
Investment in Bank |
|
|
170,433 |
|
ESOP note receivable |
|
|
9,253 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
354 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
198,723 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payable to subsidiary |
|
$ |
96 |
|
Stockholders equity |
|
|
198,627 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
$ |
198,723 |
|
|
|
|
|
Condensed Statement of Income
Period from January 20, 2010 through December 31, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income on ESOP loan |
|
$ |
293 |
|
Other income |
|
|
26 |
|
Operating expenses |
|
|
1,361 |
|
|
|
|
|
Loss before income tax expense and equity in
undistributed earnings of subsidiary |
|
|
(1,042 |
) |
Income tax benefit |
|
|
(354 |
) |
Equity in undistributed earnings of subsidiary |
|
|
2,345 |
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
1,657 |
|
|
|
|
|
124
OmniAmerican Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiary
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(Dollars in thousands)
Condensed Statement of Cash Flows
Period from January 20, 2010 through December 31, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
1,657 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash used
in operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
Equity in undistributed earnings of subsidiary |
|
|
(2,344 |
) |
Net change in other assets |
|
|
(354 |
) |
Net change in payable to subsidiary |
|
|
96 |
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in operating activities |
|
|
(945 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
Cash contribution to subsidiary |
|
|
(86,644 |
) |
Payment received on ESOP note receivable |
|
|
268 |
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(86,376 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of common stock |
|
|
106,004 |
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by financing activities |
|
|
106,004 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
18,683 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period |
|
$ |
18,683 |
|
|
|
|
|
NOTE 19 Earnings Per Share
Basic earnings per share excludes dilution and is calculated by dividing net income by the weighted
average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per share
is calculated in a manner similar to that of basic earnings per share except that the weighted
average number of common shares outstanding is increased to include the number of incremental
common shares that would have been outstanding if all potentially dilutive common stock equivalents
(such as stock options or unvested restricted stock) were issued during the period, as well as any
adjustments to income that would result from the assumed issuance. There were no dilutive
securities for the year ended December 31, 2010.
Because the mutual to stock conversion was not completed until January 20, 2010, per share earnings
data has not been presented for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008.
Unallocated common shares held by the ESOP are shown as a reduction in stockholders equity and are
not included in the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for either basic or
diluted earnings per share calculations.
125
OmniAmerican Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiary
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(Dollars in thousands)
Earnings per share for the year ended December 31, 2010 have been computed as follows (dollars in
thousands, except per share data):
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted |
|
|
|
|
Earnings: |
|
|
|
|
Net income (1) |
|
$ |
1,490 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares (1): |
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding |
|
|
11,902,500 |
|
Less: Average unallocated ESOP shares |
|
|
(931,569 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Average shares |
|
|
10,970,931 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per common share, basic and diluted (1) |
|
$ |
0.14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Calculated from the effective date of January 20, 2010 to the year end. |
126
OmniAmerican Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiary
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(Dollars in thousands)
NOTE 20 Quarterly Financial Data
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fourth |
|
|
Third |
|
|
Second |
|
|
First |
|
|
|
Quarter |
|
|
Quarter |
|
|
Quarter |
|
|
Quarter |
|
2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income |
|
$ |
12,688 |
|
|
$ |
13,542 |
|
|
$ |
13,457 |
|
|
$ |
13,160 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
3,354 |
|
|
|
3,576 |
|
|
|
3,504 |
|
|
|
3,469 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income |
|
|
9,334 |
|
|
|
9,966 |
|
|
|
9,953 |
|
|
|
9,691 |
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
1,700 |
|
|
|
2,750 |
|
|
|
1,450 |
|
|
|
800 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income after
provision for loan losses |
|
|
7,634 |
|
|
|
7,216 |
|
|
|
8,503 |
|
|
|
8,891 |
|
Noninterest income |
|
|
3,553 |
|
|
|
3,451 |
|
|
|
3,471 |
|
|
|
3,224 |
|
Noninterest expense |
|
|
11,020 |
|
|
|
10,510 |
|
|
|
11,128 |
|
|
|
11,343 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income tax expense |
|
|
167 |
|
|
|
157 |
|
|
|
846 |
|
|
|
772 |
|
Income tax (benefit) expense |
|
|
(149 |
) |
|
|
(44 |
) |
|
|
239 |
|
|
|
239 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
316 |
|
|
$ |
201 |
|
|
$ |
607 |
|
|
$ |
533 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic: |
|
$ |
0.03 |
|
|
$ |
0.02 |
|
|
$ |
0.06 |
|
|
$ |
0.03 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted: |
|
$ |
0.03 |
|
|
$ |
0.02 |
|
|
$ |
0.06 |
|
|
$ |
0.03 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income |
|
$ |
12,741 |
|
|
$ |
13,323 |
|
|
$ |
13,736 |
|
|
$ |
13,915 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
3,941 |
|
|
|
4,570 |
|
|
|
5,254 |
|
|
|
5,909 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income |
|
|
8,800 |
|
|
|
8,753 |
|
|
|
8,482 |
|
|
|
8,006 |
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
875 |
|
|
|
1,925 |
|
|
|
900 |
|
|
|
1,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income after
provision for loan losses |
|
|
7,925 |
|
|
|
6,828 |
|
|
|
7,582 |
|
|
|
6,506 |
|
Noninterest income |
|
|
3,598 |
|
|
|
4,503 |
|
|
|
3,959 |
|
|
|
4,403 |
|
Noninterest expense |
|
|
11,227 |
|
|
|
11,028 |
|
|
|
10,946 |
|
|
|
10,556 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income tax expense |
|
|
296 |
|
|
|
303 |
|
|
|
595 |
|
|
|
353 |
|
Income tax expense |
|
|
198 |
|
|
|
205 |
|
|
|
299 |
|
|
|
190 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
98 |
|
|
$ |
98 |
|
|
$ |
296 |
|
|
$ |
163 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
127
|
|
|
ITEM 9. |
|
Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial
Disclosure |
None.
|
|
|
ITEM 9A. |
|
Controls and Procedures |
(a) Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
An evaluation was performed under the supervision and with the participation of the Companys
management, including the President and Chief Executive Officer and the Senior Executive Vice
President and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the
Companys disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) promulgated under the
Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) as of December 31, 2010. Based on that
evaluation, the Companys management, including the President and Chief Executive Officer and the
Senior Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, concluded that the Companys
disclosure controls and procedures were effective.
(b) Managements Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
The management of the Company is responsible for establishing and maintaining an effective
system of internal control over financial reporting. The Companys internal control over financial
reporting is designed under the supervision of the Companys Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting
and the preparation of the Companys financial statements for external purposes in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles. There are inherent limitations in the effectiveness of
any system of internal control over financial reporting, including the possibility of human error
and circumvention or overriding of controls. Accordingly, even an effective system of internal
control over financial reporting can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to financial
statement preparation. Projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are
subject to the risks that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions or that
the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
Management assessed the effectiveness of the Companys internal control over financial
reporting as of December 31, 2010 based on the criteria for effective internal control over
financial reporting established in Internal ControlIntegrated Framework, issued by the
Committee of Sponsoring Organizations (COSO) of the Treadway Commission. Based on the assessment,
management believes that the Company maintained effective internal control over financial reporting
as of December 31, 2010, based on those criteria.
McGladrey & Pullen, LLP, the independent registered public accounting firm that audited the
consolidated financial statements of the Company included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, has
issued an attestation report on the effectiveness of the Corporations internal control over
financial reporting as of December 31, 2010. The attestation report of McGladrey & Pullen, LLP
appears below.
128
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To the Board of Directors and Shareholders
OmniAmerican Bancorp, Inc.
We have audited OmniAmerican Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiarys internal control over financial
reporting as of December 31, 2010, based on criteria established in Internal Control Integrated
Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.
OmniAmerican Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiarys management is responsible for maintaining effective
internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal
control over financial reporting included in Managements Report on Internal Control over Financial
Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the companys internal control over
financial reporting based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight
Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was
maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal
control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing
and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed
risk. Our audit also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the
circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
A companys internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable
assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial
statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A
companys internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (a)
pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the
transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (b) provide reasonable assurance that
transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance
with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company
are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company;
and (c) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized
acquisition, use, or disposition of the companys assets that could have a material effect on the
financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or
detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are
subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that
the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
In our opinion, OmniAmerican Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiary maintained, in all material respects,
effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2010, based on criteria
established in Internal Control Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring
Organizations of the Treadway Commission.
We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight
Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2010 and 2009, and the
related consolidated statements of income, changes in stockholders equity, and cash flows for each
of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2010, of OmniAmerican Bancorp Inc. and
Subsidiary and our report dated March 10, 2011 expressed an unqualified opinion.
/s/ McGladrey & Pullen, LLP
Dallas, Texas
March 10, 2011
129
(c) Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
During the quarter ended December 31, 2010, there have been no changes in the Companys
internal control over financial reporting that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely
to materially affect, the Companys internal control over financial reporting.
|
|
|
ITEM 9B. |
|
Other Information |
None.
PART III
|
|
|
ITEM 10. |
|
Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance |
OmniAmerican Bancorp, Inc. has adopted a Code of Ethics that applies to OmniAmerican Bancorp,
Inc.s principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer or
controller or persons performing similar functions. The Code of Ethics was filed as Exhibit 14 to
the Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009. A copy of the Code will be furnished without
charge upon written request to the Secretary, OmniAmerican Bancorp, Inc., 1320 South University
Drive, Suite 900, Fort Worth, Texas 76107.
Information concerning directors and executive officers of OmniAmerican Bancorp, Inc. is
incorporated herein by reference from our definitive Proxy Statement (the Proxy Statement),
specifically the section captioned Proposal 1 Election of Directors.
|
|
|
ITEM 11. |
|
Executive Compensation |
Information concerning executive compensation is incorporated herein by reference from our
Proxy Statement, specifically the section captioned Proposal 1 Election of Directors.
|
|
|
ITEM 12. |
|
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related
Stockholder Matters |
Information concerning security ownership of certain owners and management is incorporated
herein by reference from our Proxy Statement, specifically the sections captioned Voting
Securities and Principal Holders Thereof and Proposal 1 Election of Directors.
|
|
|
ITEM 13. |
|
Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence |
Information concerning relationships and transactions is incorporated herein by reference from
our Proxy Statement, specifically the section captioned Transactions with Certain Related
Persons.
|
|
|
ITEM 14. |
|
Principal Accountant Fees and Services |
Information concerning principal accountant fees and services is incorporated herein by
reference from our Proxy Statement, specifically the section captioned Proposal 2 Ratification
of Appointment of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.
130
PART IV
|
|
|
ITEM 15. |
|
Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.1 |
|
|
Articles of Incorporation of OmniAmerican Bancorp, Inc., as amended* |
|
3.2 |
|
|
Bylaws of OmniAmerican Bancorp, Inc.* |
|
4 |
|
|
Form of Common Stock Certificate of OmniAmerican Bancorp, Inc.* |
|
10.1 |
|
|
Employment Agreement between OmniAmerican Bank, OmniAmerican Bancorp, Inc. and Tim Carter** |
|
10.2 |
|
|
Form of Change in Control Agreement between OmniAmerican Bank and each Senior Executive Vice President* |
|
10.3 |
|
|
OmniAmerican Bank Employee Stock Ownership Plan* |
|
10.4 |
|
|
OmniAmerican Bank Incentive Award Plan for Senior Executives*** |
|
14 |
|
|
Code of Ethics**** |
|
21 |
|
|
Subsidiaries of Registrant* |
|
31.1 |
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
|
31.2 |
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
|
32 |
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Incorporated by reference to the Registration Statement on Form S-1 of OmniAmerican Bancorp,
Inc. (File No. 333-161894), originally filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
September 11, 2009, as amended. |
|
** |
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Form 8-K of OmniAmerican Bancorp, Inc.,
(File No. 001-34605), originally filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February
25, 2010. |
|
*** |
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Form 8-K of OmniAmerican Bancorp, Inc.,
(File No. 001-34605), originally filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February
1, 2010. |
|
**** |
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 14 to the Form 10-K of OmniAmerican Bancorp, Inc., (File
No. 001-34605), originally filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 24,
2010. |
131
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
the Company has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto
duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
OMNIAMERICAN BANCORP, INC.
|
|
Date: March 10, 2011 |
By: |
/s/ Tim Carter
|
|
|
|
Tim Carter |
|
|
|
President, Chief Executive Officer and Director
(Duly Authorized Representative) |
|
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange of 1934, this report has been signed
by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates
indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
Signatures |
|
Title |
|
Date |
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Tim Carter
Tim Carter
|
|
President, Chief Executive
Officer and Director
(Principal Executive
Officer)
|
|
March 10, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Deborah B. Wilkinson
Deborah B. Wilkinson
|
|
Senior Executive Vice
President and Chief
Financial Officer
(Principal Financial and
Accounting Officer)
|
|
March 10, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
/s/
Elaine Anderson
Elaine Anderson
|
|
Chairman of the Board
|
|
March 10, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
/s/
John F. Sammons, Jr.
John F. Sammons, Jr.
|
|
Vice Chairman of the Board
|
|
March 10, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Joan Anthony
Joan Anthony
|
|
Director
|
|
March 10, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Wayne P. Burchfield, Jr.
Wayne P. Burchfield, Jr.
|
|
Director
|
|
March 10, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Norman G. Carroll
Norman G. Carroll
|
|
Director
|
|
March 10, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Patti Callan
Patti Callan
|
|
Director
|
|
March 10, 2011 |
132
|
|
|
|
|
Signatures |
|
Title |
|
Date |
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Patrick D. Conley
Patrick D. Conley
|
|
Director
|
|
March 10, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ James Herring
James Herring
|
|
Director
|
|
March 10, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Wesley R. Turner
Wesley R. Turner
|
|
Director
|
|
March 10, 2011 |
133