Deep Down, Inc. - FORM 10-Q/A

Attached files

file	filename
EX-31.2 - CERTIFICATION - Deep Down, Inc.	deepdown_10qa1-ex3102.htm
EX-31.1 - CERTIFICATION - Deep Down, Inc.	deepdown_10qa1-ex3101.htm
EX-32.1 - CERTIFICATION - Deep Down, Inc.	deepdown_10qa1-ex3201.htm
EX-32.2 - CERTIFICATION - Deep Down, Inc.	deepdown_10qa1-ex3202.htm

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q/ A

Amendment No. 1

x	QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2010

¨	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Commission File No. 0-30351

DEEP DOWN, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Nevada		75-2263732
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation)		(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

8827 W. Sam Houston Pkwy N., Suite 100, Houston, Texas		77040
(Address of Principal Executive Office)		(Zip Code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (281) 517-5000

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months, and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. x Yes ¨ No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes ¨ No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large accelerated filer ¨	Accelerated filer ¨

Non-accelerated filer ¨ (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)	Smaller reporting company x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).Yes ¨ No x

At November 17, 2010, there were 205,600,630 shares of common stock outstanding.

Explanatory Note

Deep Down, Inc., a Nevada corporation (“Deep Down” or the “Company”), is filing this Amendment No. 1 (this “Amendment”) to its Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 19, 2010 (the “Form 10-Q”). This Amendment includes a restatement of the following previously filed unaudited consolidated financial statements and data (and related disclosures) (the “Restatement”): (1) the unaudited consolidated balance sheet as of September 30, 2010, and the related consolidated statements of operations and cash flows for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010; (2) management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations as of and for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010, contained in Part I, Item 2 of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A; and (3) certain notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements in Part I, Item 1 of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A.

As previously announced, in conjunction with an internal review meeting of Flotation Technologies, Inc., a Maine corporation (“Flotation”) and a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company, management of the Company (“Management”) reviewed the status of one of its long-term fixed price contracts (the “Contract”) that was entered into by the Company in November of 2008 and is scheduled to be completed in the third quarter of 2011. As a result of this review, Management identified errors in the percentage of completion accounting model for revenue recognition pertaining to this Contract. On January 14, 2011, the Audit Committee of the Company’s Board of Directors (the “Audit Committee”) concluded, based on recommendations from Management, that, as a result of these errors, the Company’s unaudited consolidated interim financial statements for the quarterly periods ended March 31, 2010, June 30, 2010 and September 30, 2010 should no longer be relied on and should be restated. The Company considered the effect of the error to be immaterial to the consolidated financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2009.

Historically, as of September 30, 2010, we were in compliance with all financial covenants under our credit agreement with Whitney National Bank. However, due to the Restatement adjustments, the leverage ratio and the fixed charge coverage ratio are out of compliance as of September 30, 2010. See further discussion in Note 11, “Long-Term Debt”.

The following table summarizes the financial statement caption adjustments to our previously reported unaudited consolidated statement of operations (in thousands):

	Three Months Ended			Nine Months Ended
	September 30, 2010			September 30, 2010

Revenues	$	(1,023	)	$	(1,433	)
Cost of sales		-			-
Operating expenses		-			-
Effect on operating income	$	(1,023	)	$	(1,433	)

For more information regarding the Restatement, please refer to Part I, Item 2 “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations”; Note 2, “Restatement of Previously Reported Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements,” Note 7, “Costs and Estimated Earnings in Excess of Billings on Uncompleted Contracts and Deferred Revenues,” Note 11 “Long Term Debt,” and Note 17 “Earnings per Common Share,” of the Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements in Part I, Item 1; and Part I, Item 4, “Controls and Procedures.”

This Amendment sets forth the Form 10-Q in its entirety; however, this Amendment only amends and restates the Items listed above, in each case, solely as a result of, and to reflect, the Restatement, and no other information in the Form 10-Q is amended hereby. This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A continues to speak as of the dates described herein, and we have not updated the disclosures contained in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A to reflect any events that occurred subsequent to such dates. Accordingly, this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A should be read in conjunction with our filings made with the Securities and Exchange Commission subsequent to November 19, 2010, as information in such filings may update or supersede certain information contained in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A. In addition, as required by Rule 12b-15 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), currently dated certifications by our principal executive officer and principal financial officer are included in this Amendment and apply to the Form 10-Q, as amended by this Amendment. The certifications of our principal executive officer and principal financial officer are attached to this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A as Exhibits 31.1, 31.2, 32.1 and 32.2, respectively.

IMPORTANT INFORMATION REGARDING THIS FORM 10-Q/ A

Unless otherwise indicated, references to “we”, “us” and “our” in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/ A refer collectively to Deep Down, Inc., a Nevada corporation, and its wholly-owned subsidiaries.

Deep Down, Inc., a Nevada corporation (“Deep Down”), is the parent company to its wholly-owned subsidiaries: Deep Down, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“Deep Down Delaware”), ElectroWave USA, Inc., a Nevada corporation (“ElectroWave”), Mako Technologies, LLC, a Nevada limited liability company (“Mako”), Flotation Technologies, Inc., a Maine corporation (“Flotation”), and Deep Down International Holdings, LLC, a Nevada limited liability company (“DDIH”) since its formation in February 2009.

Readers should consider the following information as they review this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/ A :

Forward-Looking Statements

The statements contained or incorporated by reference in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/ A that are not historical facts are “forward-looking statements” (as such term is defined in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995), within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). All statements other than statements of historical fact are, or may be deemed to be, forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements include any statement that may project, indicate or imply future results, events, performance or achievements. The forward-looking statements contained herein are based on current expectations that involve a number of risks and uncertainties. These statements can be identified by the use of forward-looking terminology such as “believes”, “expect”, “may”, “will”, “should”, “intend”, “plan”, “could”, “estimate” or “anticipate” or the negatives thereof or other variations thereon or comparable terminology, or by discussions of strategy that involve risks and uncertainties.

Given the risks and uncertainties relating to forward-looking statements, investors should not place undue reliance on such statements. Forward-looking statements included in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/ A speak only as of the date of this Report and are not guarantees of future performance. Although we believe that the expectations reflected in the forward-looking statements are reasonable, such expectations may prove to be incorrect. All subsequent written and oral forward-looking statements attributable to us, or persons acting on our behalf, are expressly qualified in their entirety by these cautionary statements.

Subsequent Events

Except as modified for the effects of the Restatement, all statements in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A, including the forward-looking statements discussed above, are made as of November 19, 2010 unless those statements are expressly made as of another date . We disclaim any responsibility for the accuracy of any information contained in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/ A to the extent such information is affected or impacted by events, circumstances or developments occurring after November 19, 2010 or by the passage of time after such date. Except to the extent required by applicable securities laws, we expressly disclaim any obligation or undertakings to release publicly any updates or revisions to any statement or information contained in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/ A , including the forward-looking statements discussed above, to reflect any change in our expectations with regard thereto or any change in events, conditions or circumstances on which any statement or information is based.

Document Summaries

Descriptions of documents and agreements contained in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/ A are provided in summary form only, and such summaries are qualified in their entirety by reference to the actual documents and agreements filed as exhibits to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009, other periodic and current reports we file with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) or this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/ A .

Access to Filings

Access to our Annual Reports on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K, and amendments to those reports, filed with or furnished to the SEC pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act, as well as reports filed electronically pursuant to Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act, may be obtained through our website (http://www.deepdowncorp.com). Our website provides a hyperlink to a third-party website where these reports may be viewed and printed at no cost as soon as reasonably practicable after we have electronically filed or furnished such material with the SEC. The contents of our website is not, and shall not be deemed to be, incorporated into this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/ A .

iii

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

		Page No.

Item 1.	Financial Statements
	Unaudited Consolidated Balance Sheets at September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009	1
	Unaudited Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2010 and 2009	2
	Unaudited Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2010 and 2009	3
	Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements	4
Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	21
Item 4.	Controls and Procedures	30

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1.	Legal Proceedings	31
Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	31
Item 5.	Other Information	31
Item 6.	Exhibits	31

Signatures		33
Index to Exhibits		34

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

DEEP DOWN, INC.

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(Unaudited)

(In thousands, except par value amounts)	September 30, 2010			December 31, 2009
ASSETS	(As restated)
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	3,639		$	912
Accounts receivable, net of allowance of $245 and $304, respectively		5,282			7,662
Inventory		712			896
Costs and estimated earnings in excess of billings on uncompleted contracts		887			267
Deposit		882			-
Prepaid expenses and other current assets		408			225
Total current assets		11,810			9,962
Property, plant and equipment, net		19,577			20,011
Intangibles, net		11,117			12,166
Goodwill		4,916			9,429
Other assets		1,894			1,136
Total assets	$	49,314		$	52,704

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities	$	5,272		$	2,865
Billings in excess of costs and estimated earnings on uncompleted contracts		4,814			4,984
Deferred revenues		507			89
Current portion of long-term debt		3,843			1,497
Total current liabilities		14,436			9,435
Long-term debt, net		2,362			5,379
Total liabilities		16, 798			14,814

Commitments and contingencies (Note 16)

Stockholders' equity:
Common stock, $0.001 par value, 490,000 shares authorized, 205,601
and 180,451 shares, respectively, issued and outstanding		206			180
Additional paid-in capital		63,147			61,161
Accumulated deficit		(30,837	)		(23,451	)
Total stockholders' equity		32,516			37,890
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity	$	49,314		$	52,704

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the unaudited consolidated financial statements.

DEEP DOWN, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(Unaudited)


	Three Months Ended						Nine Months Ended
	September 30,						September 30,
(In thousands, except per share amounts)	2010			2009			2010			2009
	(As restated)						(As restated)
Revenues	$	10,410		$	8,048		$	26,236		$	21,351
Cost of sales:
Cost of sales		6,082			5,826			15,678			14,266
Depreciation expense		610			450			1,718			1,147
Total cost of sales		6,692			6,276			17,396			15,413
Gross profit		3,718			1,772			8,840			5,938
Operating expenses:
Selling, general and administrative		3,224			3,585			10,201			10,302
Depreciation and amortization		419			415			1,301			1,242
Goodwill impairment		4,513			-			4,513			-
Total operating expenses		8,156			4,000			16,015			11,544
Operating loss		(4,438	)		(2,228	)		(7,175	)		(5,606	)
Other income (expense):
Interest expense, net		(124	)		(115	)		(397	)		(227	)
Other income, net		195			4			245			15
Total other income (expense)		71			(111	)		(152	)		(212	)
Loss before income taxes		(4,367	)		(2,339	)		(7,327	)		(5,818	)
Income tax (expense) benefit		(21	)		(129	)		(59	)		859
Net loss	$	(4,388	)	$	(2,468	)	$	(7,386	)	$	(4,959	)

Net loss per share, basic and diluted	$	(0.02	)	$	(0.01	)	$	(0.04	)	$	(0.03	)

Weighted-average common shares outstanding, basic and diluted		196,039			179,929			188,902			179,086

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the unaudited consolidated financial statements.

DEEP DOWN, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(Unaudited)

	Nine Months Ended
	September 30,
(In thousands)	2010			2009
	(As restated)
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net loss	$	(7,386	)	$	(4,959	)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by operating activities:
Non-cash impairment of goodwill		4,513			-
Share-based compensation expense		614			643
Stock issued for services		14			-
Bad debt expense		72			126
Depreciation and amortization expense		3,019			2,389
Gain on disposal of property, plant and equipment		(190	)		(21	)
Deferred income taxes, net		-			(909	)
Changes in assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable		2,308			6,440
Inventory		184			310
Costs and estimated earnings in excess of billings on uncompleted contracts		(620	)		(40	)
Prepaid expenses and other current assets		118			(287	)
Other assets		(294	)		(112	)
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities		2,104			(289	)
Deferred revenues		418			4
Billings in excess of costs and estimated earnings on uncompleted contracts		(170	)		1,311
Net cash provided by operating activities		4,704			4,606

Cash flows from investing activities:
Purchases of property, plant and equipment		(1,693	)		(5,536	)
Proceeds from sale of property, plant and equipment		251			53
Investment in joint venture		(25	)		(150	)
Proceeds from final settlement of acquisition of Flotation		-			58
Cash paid for capitalized software		(245	)		(383	)
Proceeds from note receivable		(94	)		(23	)
Change in restricted cash		-			136
Net cash used in investing activities		(1,806	)		(5,845	)

Cash flows from financing activities:
Proceeds from sale of common stock		501			-
Borrowings of long-term debt		-			3,000
Repayments of long-term debt		(672	)		(360	)
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities		(171	)		2,640
Change in cash and equivalents		2,727			1,401
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period		912			2,495
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period	$	3,639		$	3,896

Supplemental schedule of noncash operating, investing and financing activities:
Prepaid insurance purchased with debt	$	305		$	-
Fixed assets purchased with debt	$	-		$	2,100
Fixed assets purchased with capital lease	$	-		$	92
Fixed assets transferred to other assets	$	100		$	-
Stock issued for deposit	$	882		$	-
Restricted stock issued for service	$	2		$	3

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the unaudited consolidated financial statements.

Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements

(Amounts in thousands except per share amounts)

Note 1: Basis of Presentation

Basis of Presentation

The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements of Deep Down, Inc. and its wholly-owned subsidiaries (“Deep Down”, “we”, “us” or “our”) were prepared in accordance with the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Commission”) pertaining to interim financial information and instructions to Form 10-Q. As permitted under those rules, certain footnotes or other financial information that are normally required by United States generally accepted accounting principles (“US GAAP”) can be condensed or omitted. Therefore, these statements should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and footnotes thereto included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009, filed on April 15, 2010 with the Commission.

Preparation of financial statements in conformity with US GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, the disclosed amounts of contingent assets and liabilities and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses. If the underlying estimates and assumptions upon which the financial statements are based change in future periods, actual amounts may differ from those included in the accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring adjustments) considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included.

In the notes to the unaudited consolidated financial statements, all dollar and share amounts are in thousands except for per share data or unless otherwise indicated.

Prior period information presented in these financial statements includes reclassifications which were made to conform to the current period presentation. Specifically, depreciation expense included in cost of sales has been presented as a separate line on the face of the statements of operations. Additionally, deferred revenues have been split out from billings in excess of costs and estimated earnings on uncompleted contracts on the face of the balance sheets. These reclassifications had no effect on our previously reported gross profit, net loss or stockholders’ equity.

Principles of Consolidation

The unaudited consolidated financial statements presented herein include the accounts of Deep Down, Inc. and its wholly-owned subsidiaries for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009. All intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated.

Segments

For the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, the operations of Deep Down’s operating segments, Deep Down Delaware, ElectroWave, Mako and Flotation, have been aggregated into a single reporting segment. While the operating segments have different product lines, they are very similar. They are all service-based operations revolving around our expertise in the deepwater industry, and any equipment is produced to customer-specified designs and engineered using Deep Down personnel expertise, with installation and project management being part of our service revenue to the customer. Additionally, the segments have similar customers and distribution methods, and their economic characteristics are similar with regard to their gross margin percentages. Our operations are based in the United States, although we also generate revenues from international customers.

Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements

(Amounts in thousands except per share amounts)

Note 2: Restatement of Previously Reported Consolidated Financial Statements

As previously announced, in conjunction with an internal review meeting of Flotation Technologies, Inc., a Maine corporation (“Flotation”) and a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company, management of the Company (“Management”) reviewed the status of one of its long-term fixed price contracts (the “Contract”) that was entered into by the Company in November of 2008 and is scheduled to be completed in the third quarter of 2011. As a result of this review, Management identified errors in the labor and burden rates applied to the project costs used in the percentage of completion accounting model which is used to determine the amount of revenue to recognize in the Company’s financial statements. Additionally, Management determined that the cost estimate at completion for the Contract was not updated in a timely manner, and that the Contract was inappropriately bifurcated between two business units instead of treating it as a single contract. On January 14, 2011, the Audit Committee of the Company’s Board of Directors (the “Audit Committee”) concluded, based on recommendations from Management, that, as a result of these errors, the Company’s unaudited consolidated interim financial statements for the quarterly periods ended March 31, 2010, June 30, 2010 and September 30, 2010 should no longer be relied on and should be restated. The error had an immaterial effect on the Company's unaudited consolidated interim financial statements for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009.

The following tables present the effects of the Restatement to the Company’s previously reported unaudited Consolidated Balance Sheet as of September 30, 2010. The Company considered the effect of the error to be immaterial to the consolidated financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2009. Accordingly, the 2009 balances reflect the correction of an immaterial error that resulted in an increase of $639 to the amounts of billings in excess of costs and estimated earnings on uncompleted contracts and accumulated deficit as reported on our consolidated balance sheet in our December 31, 2009 Form 10-K.

Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements

(Amounts in thousands except per share amounts)

	September 30, 2010
ASSETS	As reported			Adjustments			As restated
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	3,639		$	-		$	3,639
Accounts receivable, net of allowance of $245		5,282			-			5,282
Inventory		712			-			712
Costs and estimated earnings in excess of billings on uncompleted contracts		887			-			887
Deposit		882			-			882
Prepaid expenses and other current assets		408			-			408
Total current assets		11,810			-			11,810
Property, plant and equipment, net		19,577			-			19,577
Intangibles, net		11,117			-			11,117
Goodwill		4,916			-			4,916
Other assets		1,894			-			1,894
Total assets	$	49,314		$	-		$	49,314

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities	$	5,272		$	-		$	5,272
Billings in excess of costs and estimated earnings on uncompleted contracts		2,742			2,072			4,814
Deferred revenues		507			-			507
Current portion of long-term debt		3,843			-			3,843
Total current liabilities		12,364			2,072			14,436
Long-term debt, net		2,362			-			2,362
Total liabilities		14,726			2,072			16,798

Stockholders' equity:
Common stock, $0.001 par value, 490,000 shares authorized, 205,601
shares, issued and outstanding		206			-			206
Additional paid-in capital		63,147			-			63,147
Accumulated deficit		(28,765	)		(2,072	)		(30,837	)
Total stockholders' equity		34,588			(2,072	)		32,516
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity	$	49,314		$	-		$	49,314

Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements

(Amounts in thousands except per share amounts)

The following table presents the effects of the Restatement to the Company’s previously reported unaudited Consolidated Statement of Operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010. The unaudited Consolidated Statement of Operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009 have also been adjusted to correct the immaterial effects of the error. The amounts of revenues and gross profit for both the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009 as presented in our September 30, 2009 Form 10-Q were reduced by $378, which resulted in a corresponding $378 increase to operating loss, loss before income taxes and net loss.

	Three Months Ended September 30, 2010									Nine Months Ended September 30, 2010
	As reported			Adjustments			As restated			As reported			Adjustments			As restated

Revenues	$	11,433		$	(1,023	)	$	10,410		$	27,669		$	(1,433	)	$	26,236
Cost of sales:
Cost of sales		6,082			-			6,082			15,678			-			15,678
Depreciation expense		610			-			610			1,718			-			1,718
Total cost of sales		6,692			-			6,692			17,396			-			17,396
Gross profit		4,741			(1,023	)		3,718			10,273			(1,433	)		8,840
Operating expenses:
Selling, general and administrative		3,224			-			3,224			10,201			-			10,201
Depreciation and amortization		419			-			419			1,301			-			1,301
Goodwill impairment		4,513			-			4,513			4,513			-			4,513
Total operating expenses		8,156			-			8,156			16,015			-			16,015
Operating loss		(3,415	)		(1,023	)		(4,438	)		(5,742	)		(1,433	)		(7,175	)
Other income (expense):
Interest expense, net		(124	)		-			(124	)		(397	)		-			(397	)
Other income, net		195			-			195			245			-			245
Total other income (expense)		71			-			71			(152	)		-			(152	)
Loss before income taxes		(3,344	)		(1,023	)		(4,367	)		(5,894	)		(1,433	)		(7,327	)
Income tax expense		(21	)		-			(21	)		(59	)		-			(59	)
Net loss	$	(3,365	)	$	(1,023	)	$	(4,388	)	$	(5,953	)	$	(1,433	)	$	(7,386	)

Net loss per share, basic and diluted	$	(0.02	)				$	(0.02	)	$	(0.03	)				$	(0.04	)
Weighted-average common shares
outstanding, basic and diluted		196,039						196,039			188,902						188,902

Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements

(Amounts in thousands except per share amounts)

Note 3 : Liquidity and Financial Condition

As a deepwater service provider, our revenues, profitability, cash flows, and future rate of growth are substantially dependent on the condition of the global oil and gas industry generally, and our customers’ ability to invest capital for offshore exploration, drilling and production and maintain or increase levels of expenditures for maintenance of offshore drilling and production facilities. Oil and gas prices and the level of offshore drilling and production activity have historically been characterized by significant volatility. We enter into large, fixed-price contracts which may require significant lead time and investment. A decline in offshore drilling and production activity could result in lower contract volume or delays in significant contracts which could negatively impact our earnings and cash flows. Our earnings and cash flows could also be negatively affected by delay in payments by significant customers or delays in completion of our contracts for any reason. While our objective is to enter into contracts with our customers that are cash flow positive, we may not always be able to achieve this objective. We are dependent on our cash flows from operations to fund our working capital requirements and the uncertainties noted above create risks that we may not achieve our planned earnings or cash flow from operations, which may require us to raise additional debt or equity capital. There can be no assurance that we could raise additional capital.

The Whitney National Bank (“Whitney”) Amended and Restated Credit Agreement (“New Agreement”) becomes due on April 15, 2011 and we will need to raise additional debt or equity capital or renegotiate the existing debt prior to the expiration date. Therefore, we are currently in discussions with several lenders who have expressed interest in refinancing our debt. Our plan is to refinance the debt under the Whitney New Agreement in conjunction with obtaining financing to consummate the purchase of Cuming Corporation. See additional discussion in Note 18 , Subsequent Events. We cannot provide any assurance that any financing will be available to us in the future on acceptable terms or at all. If we are unable to raise additional capital or renegotiate our existing debt, this would have a material adverse impact on our business or would raise substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern. Historically, as of September 30, 2010, we were in compliance with all financial covenants under our credit agreement with Whitney. However, due to the Restatement adjustments, the leverage ratio and the fixed charge coverage ratio are out of compliance as of September 30, 2010. Under the terms of the New Agreement, Whitney could accelerate and immediately require all amounts outstanding under the New Agreement to become due on the basis of such noncompliance.

Although we believe that we will have adequate liquidity to meet our future operating requirements if our planned financial results are achieved, and we will be able to raise additional capital or renegotiate our existing debt, the factors described above create uncertainty.

Note 4 : Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In January 2010, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2010-06, Improving Disclosures about Fair Value Measurements (“ASU 2010-06”). This update provides amendments to Subtopic 820-10 and requires new disclosures for 1) significant transfers in and out of Level 1 and Level 2 and the reasons for such transfers and 2) activity in Level 3 fair value measurements to show separate information about purchases, sales, issuances and settlements. In addition, this update amends Subtopic 820-10 to clarify existing disclosures around the disaggregation level of fair value measurements and disclosures for the valuation techniques and inputs utilized (for Level 2 and Level 3 fair value measurements). The provisions in ASU 2010-06 are applicable to interim and annual reporting periods beginning subsequent to December 15, 2009, with the exception of Level 3 disclosures of purchases, sales, issuances and settlements, which will be required in reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2010. The adoption of ASU 2010-06 did not impact our operating results, financial position or cash flows.

Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements

(Amounts in thousands except per share amounts)

Note 5 : Fair Value of Financial Instruments

Fair value is defined as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. We utilize a fair value hierarchy, which maximizes the use of observable inputs and minimizes the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. The fair value hierarchy has three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value:

Level 1 - Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets that are accessible at the measurement date for identical, unrestricted assets or liabilities.

Level 2 - Quoted prices in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable, either directly or indirectly, for substantially the full term of the asset or liability.

Level 3 - Prices or valuation techniques that require inputs that are both significant to the fair value measurement and unobservable.

Our financial instruments consist primarily of cash equivalents, trade receivables and payables and debt instruments. The carrying values of cash, accounts receivable, and accounts payable approximate their fair values due to the short-term maturity of these instruments. Our long term debt was valued using techniques that require inputs that are both significant to the fair value measurement and unobservable (Level 3), specifically treasury rates adjusted for our credit risk premium. At September 30, 2010, our debt, excluding capital leases, had a carrying value of $5,776 and a fair value of $5,118.

Considerable judgment is required in interpreting data to develop the estimates of fair value. Accordingly, the estimates presented above are not necessarily indicative of the amounts we could realize in a current market exchange. As no active market exists for a significant portion of our financial instruments, fair value estimates were based on judgments regarding current economic conditions, future expected cash flows and loss experience, risk characteristics and other factors. These estimates are subjective in nature and involve uncertainties and therefore cannot be calculated with precision (Level 3). There may be inherent weaknesses in calculation techniques, and changes in the underlying assumptions used, including discount rates and estimates of future cash flows, which could significantly affect the results.

Note 6 : Inventory

The components of inventory are summarized below:

	September 30, 2010		December 31, 2009

Raw materials	$	587	$	765
Work in progress		91		84
Finished goods		34		47
Total inventory	$	712	$	896

Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements

(Amounts in thousands except per share amounts)

Note 7 : Costs and Estimated Earnings in Excess of Billings on Uncompleted Contracts and Deferred Revenues

The components of costs and estimated earnings in excess of billings on uncompleted contracts are summarized below:

	September 30, 2010			December 31, 2009
	(As restated)
Costs incurred on uncompleted contracts	$	4,763		$	3,319
Estimated earnings on uncompleted contracts		359			2,304
		5,122			5,623
Less: Billings to date on uncompleted contracts		(9,049	)		(10,340	)
	$	(3,927	)	$	(4,717	)

Included in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets under the following captions:
Costs and estimated earnings in excess of billings on uncompleted contracts	$	887		$	267
Billings in excess of costs and estimated earnings on uncompleted contracts		(4,814	)		(4,984	)
	$	(3,927	)	$	(4,717	)

At September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, the asset balances of $887 and $267, respectively, were related to several contracts that are projected to be completed during fiscal 2010. The balances in billings in excess of costs and estimated earnings on uncompleted contracts at September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, were $4,814 and $4,984 , respectively, and consisted of significant milestone billings, primarily related to a large fabrication project for which we had suspended work until we received payment from the customer, plus several smaller contracts that are expected to be completed in fiscal 2010. We received progress payments for the large fabrication project and recommenced work on this project during the third quarter of 2010 and expect to complete this work in 2011.

The effects of the Restatement to the Company’s previously reported components of costs and estimated earnings in excess of billings on uncompleted contracts as of September 30, 2010 were as follows: a decrease in costs incurred on uncompleted contracts of $1,458, plus a decrease in estimated earnings on uncompleted contracts of $614, with the net impact of $2,072 increase to billings in excess of costs and estimated earnings on uncompleted contracts. The December 31, 2009 balances reflect the correction of an immaterial error that resulted in an increase of $639 to the amounts of billings in excess of costs and estimated earnings on uncompleted contracts, which is comprised of a decrease in costs incurred on uncompleted contracts of $731, offset by an increase in estimated earnings on uncompleted contracts of $92.

At September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, we reported deferred revenue liability balances of $507 and $89, respectively. These balances represented prepayments or deposits on time and material and rental projects for which work has not yet been performed. We expect to recognize the deferred revenue at September 30, 2010 during the fourth quarter of 2010.

Note 8 : Property, Plant and Equipment

The components of net property, plant and equipment are summarized below:

	September 30, 2010			December 31, 2009
Land	$	1,954		$	1,954
Buildings and improvements		5,458			5,458
Leasehold improvements		278			313
Equipment		15,059			13,773
Furniture, computers and office equipment		1,127			1,154
Construction in progress		1,142			954
Total property, plant and equipment		25,018			23,606
Less: Accumulated depreciation		(5,441	)		(3,595	)
Property, plant and equipment, net	$	19,577		$	20,011

Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements

(Amounts in thousands except per share amounts)

On May 29, 2009, we consummated a purchase transaction with JUMA Properties, LLC (“JUMA”), a company owned by Ronald E. Smith, President, CEO and Director of Deep Down, and wife Mary L. Budrunas, Corporate Secretary and Director of Deep Down. Pursuant to a Purchase and Sale Agreement dated May 22, 2009, we acquired certain property and improvements located in Channelview, Texas, where certain of our operations are currently located (the “Channelview Property”). The Channelview Property consists of 8.203 acres and was purchased for $2,600. The transaction was conducted on an arms-length basis, with the purchase price being determined primarily on the basis of an independent appraisal, and in accordance with normal terms and conditions. See additional discussion in Note 11 , Long-Term Debt. Prior to May 29, 2009, we leased the Channelview Property from JUMA at a base rate of $15 per month. In connection with the purchase of the Channelview Property, the lease between us and JUMA was terminated. We incurred no early termination penalties from JUMA in connection with this termination.

Note 9 : Goodwill

Goodwill represents the cost in excess of the fair value of net assets acquired in business combinations. We evaluate the carrying value of goodwill annually on December 31 and between annual evaluations if events occur or circumstances change that would more likely than not reduce the fair value of the reporting unit below its carrying amount. Such circumstances could include a significant adverse decline in stock price and market capitalization, or an adverse change in business or the business climate or unanticipated competition. For purposes of our annual impairment test, our reporting units are the same as our operating segments discussed above.

The test for goodwill impairment is a two-step approach. The first step is to compare the estimated fair value of any reporting units within the Company that have goodwill with the recorded net book value (including the goodwill) of the reporting unit. If the estimated fair value of the reporting unit is higher than the recorded net book value, no impairment is deemed to exist and no further testing is required. If, however, the estimated fair value of the reporting unit is below the recorded net book value, then a second step must be performed to determine the goodwill impairment required, if any. In this second step, the estimated fair value from the first step is used as the purchase price in a hypothetical acquisition of the reporting unit. Purchase business combination accounting rules are followed to determine a hypothetical purchase price allocation to the reporting unit’s assets and liabilities. The residual amount of goodwill that results from this hypothetical purchase price allocation is compared to the carrying value of goodwill for the reporting unit, and the carrying value is written down to the hypothetical amount, if lower.

Because quoted market prices for our individual reporting units are not available, management must apply judgment in determining the estimated fair value of our reporting units for purposes of performing the annual goodwill impairment test. Management uses all available information to make these fair value determinations, including the discounting of reporting units’ projected cash flow, publicly traded company multiples and recent merger and acquisition transaction values as a multiple of earnings. A key component of these fair value determinations is an assessment of the fair value using discounted cash flows and other market-related valuation models in relation to our market capitalization.

The accounting principles regarding goodwill acknowledge that the observed market prices of individual trades of a company’s stock (and thus its computed market capitalization) may not be representative of the fair value of the entity as a whole. Substantial value may arise from the ability to take advantage of synergies and other benefits that flow from control over another entity. Consequently, measuring the fair value of a collection of assets and liabilities that operate together in a controlled entity is different from measuring the fair value of that entity’s individual common stock. In most industries, including Deep Down’s, an acquiring entity typically is willing to pay more for equity securities that give it a controlling interest than an investor would pay for a number of equity securities representing less than a controlling interest. Therefore, the above fair value calculations using discounted cash flows and other market-related valuation models are compared to market capitalization plus a control premium.

Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements

(Amounts in thousands except per share amounts)

We have assessed the current market conditions and have concluded, as of September 30, 2010, that a triggering event had occurred that required an impairment analysis of goodwill for each reporting unit. Management’s calculations indicated, due to a number of factors, including the current global economic environment, increased costs of capital and the decrease in our market capitalization, that the calculations for the reporting units of Mako and Flotation each indicated their respective net book value exceeded its fair value and, accordingly, we estimated the implied fair value of the goodwill for each reporting unit. The calculation for Deep Down Delaware did not indicate any impairment of goodwill. We used the estimated fair value of each reporting unit from the first step as the purchase price in a hypothetical acquisition of the respective reporting unit. We recognized a goodwill impairment of $2,430 for Mako and $2,083 for Flotation reporting units for the nine months ended September 30, 2010. The impairment was recorded in operating expenses in the consolidated statement of operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010. This non-cash charge did not impact our liquidity position, debt covenants or cash flows.

We estimated the fair value of the reporting units using discounted cash flows and earnings multiples of comparable publicly traded companies. The key discounted cash flow assumptions used to determine the fair value of our reporting units included: a) cash flow periods of six years with various annual revenue growth rates as estimated by management, b) terminal values based on the terminal cash flow growth rate and the capitalization rate (weighted average cost of capital – terminal growth rate) and c) a weighted average cost of capital of 26.2 percent and 27.9 percent for Flotation and Mako, respectively. The remaining goodwill by reporting unit was $4,472, $444 and $0 for the Delaware, Mako and Flotation reporting units, respectively, as of September 30, 2010. As a result of the adjustments discussed above, approximately $444 of our goodwill is recorded at fair value as of September 30, 2010, based upon Level 3 inputs. Determining the fair value of a reporting unit is judgmental in nature and requires the use of significant estimates and assumptions, including revenue growth rates and operating margins, discount rates and future market conditions, among others. Unanticipated changes in revenue, gross margin, long-term growth factor or discount rate could result in a material impact on the estimated fair values of our reporting units which could result in additional goodwill impairment in future periods.

The change in the carrying value of goodwill during the nine months ended September 30, 2010 is set forth below:

Carrying amount as of December 31, 2009	$	9,429
Goodwill impairment		(4,513	)
Carrying amount as of September 30, 2010	$	4,916

Note 10 : Intangible Assets

Identifiable intangible assets acquired in business combinations are recorded based upon fair market value at the date of acquisition. Amounts allocated to intangible assets are amortized on a straight-line basis over their estimated useful lives. Estimated intangible asset values, net of recognized amortization expense include the following:

		September 30, 2010							December 31, 2009
	Estimated	Gross Carrying		Accumulated			Net Carrying		Gross Carrying		Accumulated			Net Carrying
	Useful Life	Amount		Amortization			Amount		Amount		Amortization			Amount

Customer relationship	6-14 Years	$	3,515	$	(1,082	)	$	2,433	$	3,515	$	(786	)	$	2,729
Non-compete covenant	3-5 Years		1,119		(905	)		214		1,119		(678	)		441
Trademarks	25-40 Years		3,110		(245	)		2,865		3,110		(174	)		2,936
Technology	10 Years		6,808		(1,203	)		5,605		6,808		(748	)		6,060
Total		$	14,552	$	(3,435	)	$	11,117	$	14,552	$	(2,386	)	$	12,166

Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements

(Amounts in thousands except per share amounts)

Our intangible assets generally consist of assets acquired in the purchases of the Mako and Flotation subsidiaries and are comprised of customer lists, non-compete covenants with key employees and trademarks related to Mako’s ROVs and to Flotation’s branding, processes, materials and technology. We amortize intangible assets over their useful lives ranging from three to forty years on a straight-line basis. We make judgments and estimates in conjunction with the carrying value of these assets, including amounts to be capitalized, depreciation and amortization methods, useful lives and the valuation of acquired long-lived intangible assets.

We test for the impairment of long-lived assets upon the occurrence of a triggering event. We base our evaluation on impairment indicators such as the nature of the assets, the future economic benefit of the assets, any historical or future profitability measurements and other external market conditions or factors that may be present. If these impairment indicators are present or other factors exist that indicate the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable, we determine whether an impairment has occurred through the use of an undiscounted cash flows analysis of the asset at the lowest level for which identifiable cash flows exist. The undiscounted cash flow analysis consists of estimating the future cash flows that are directly associated with and expected to arise from the use and eventual disposition of the asset over its remaining useful life. These cash flows are inherently subjective and require significant estimates based upon historical experience and future expectations reflected in our budgets and internal projections. If the undiscounted cash flows do not exceed the carrying value of the long-lived asset, an impairment has occurred, and we recognize a loss for the difference between the carrying amount and the estimated fair value of the asset. The fair value of the asset is measured using quoted market prices or, in the absence of quoted market prices, is based on an estimate of discounted cash flows. Cash flows are generally discounted at an interest rate commensurate with our weighted average cost of capital for a similar asset.

We have assessed the current market conditions and have concluded, as of September 30, 2010, that a triggering event had occurred that required an impairment analysis of long-lived intangible assets. For the nine months ended September 30, 2010, the analysis determined that there was no impairment of long-lived assets as of September 30, 2010. Fair values for technology and customer relationships were based upon an excess earnings methodology. Fair value for non-compete agreements was based on the expected differential cash flow of the reporting unit between “with non-compete agreements” and “without” non-compete agreements scenarios.

Note 11: Long-Term Debt

The components of long-term debt are summarized below:

	September 30, 2010			December 31, 2009
Secured credit agreement - Whitney Bank	$	3,151		$	3,694
Secured credit agreement - TD Bank		2,079			2,125
Other bank loans		46			63
Total bank debt		5,276			5,882
6% Subordinated debenture		500			500
Capital lease obligations		429			494
Total debt		6,205			6,876
Less: Current portion of long-term debt		(3,843	)		(1,497	)
Long-term debt, net of current portion	$	2,362		$	5,379

Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements

(Amounts in thousands except per share amounts)

Overview

We entered into the New Agreement with Whitney, dated as of April 14, 2010, to address covenant violations we had under our Credit Agreement which we originally entered into on November 11, 2008. Under the terms of the New Agreement, our noncompliance with the prior terms of the financial covenants and certain other covenants under the Credit Agreement were waived and payment terms were restructured. We continue to remain current on payments of our principal, interest and fee obligations with Whitney and TD Bank. However, under the terms of the New Agreement, all of the indebtedness outstanding under such agreement, which is an aggregate principal amount of $3,151 at September 30, 2010, will be due on April 15, 2011, unless we are able to refinance all or a portion of such indebtedness. Additionally, we no longer have access to a line of credit under the New Agreement. Historically, as of September 30, 2010, we were in compliance with all financial covenants under the New Agreement. However, due to the Restatement adjustments, the leverage ratio and the fixed charge coverage ratio are out of compliance as of September 30, 2010. Under the terms of the New Agreement, Whitney could accelerate and immediately require all amounts outstanding under the New Agreement to become due on the basis of such noncompliance.

Whitney Credit Agreement

We originally entered into our Credit Agreement with Whitney in November 2008. The Credit Agreement originally provided a commitment to lend to us the lesser of $2,000 or 80 percent of eligible receivables (generally defined as current due accounts receivable in which the lender has a first priority security interest). All of this commitment was also available for Whitney to issue letters of credit (“L/C”) for our benefit. In December 2008, we then entered into an amendment of the Credit Agreement that provided for us to receive a term loan in the principal amount of $1,150. Then, in May 2009, we entered into another amendment to the Credit Agreement providing for us to receive another term loan in the principal amount of $2,100. We used the proceeds from the December 2008 term loan to purchase a piece of equipment (a remotely operated vehicle) and we used the proceeds of the May 2009 term loan to purchase real property in Channelview, Texas. There was $850 outstanding under the revolving credit line available under the Credit Agreement on December 31, 2009. We issued an irrevocable transferable standby L/C in the ordinary course of business, with an annual commission rate of 2.4 percent for $1,107 during the year ended December 31, 2009 related to a large contract that is expected to be completed during 2011. The New Agreement does not obligate Whitney to issue new L/Cs, however on September 1, 2010, Whitney did renew the aforementioned L/C under the same terms for a period of one year to expire on August 31, 2011. We paid the annual commission in advance, and the L/C will remain in effect until it expires, even though the New Agreement expires April 15, 2011.

We were originally obligated to repay the December 2008 term loan on the basis of monthly installments of $35, with the initial payment on February 1, 2009 and a final payment on January 2, 2012. Outstanding amounts of principal of the December 2008 term loan accrue interest at a rate of 6.5 percent per annum. Under the terms of the New Agreement, the monthly installment payments and interest rate of the December 2008 term loan remain the same and the final balloon payment of $347 is now due on April 15, 2011. As of September 30, 2010, the outstanding principal amount of the December 2008 term loan was $540 .

We were originally obligated to repay the May 2009 term loan on the basis of monthly installments of $18, with the initial payment on June 1, 2009 and a final payment on May 1, 2024. Outstanding amounts of principal of the May 2009 term loan accrue interest at a rate of 6.5 percent per annum. Under the terms of the New Agreement, the monthly installment payments and interest rate of the May 2009 term loan remain the same, and the final balloon payment of $1,927 is now due on April 15, 2011. As of September 30, 2010, the outstanding principal amount of the May 2009 term loan was $1,961.

Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements

(Amounts in thousands except per share amounts)

Upon entry into the New Agreement in April 2010, our indebtedness in the amount of $850 outstanding under the revolving credit line of the Credit Agreement was converted to a term loan. This term loan requires us to make monthly installments in the amount of $40 plus the amount of accrued and unpaid interest beginning on May 1, 2010 and a final balloon payment of $410 on April 15, 2011. Outstanding amounts of principal of the April 2010 term loan accrue interest at a rate of 6.5 percent per annum. As of September 30, 2010, the outstanding principal amount of the April 2010 term loan was $650.

Each of our subsidiaries has guaranteed our obligations under the New Agreement, and as such, our obligations in connection with the New Agreement are generally secured by a first priority lien on all of our subsidiaries’ non-real property assets. With regard to the Channelview Property purchased with the proceeds of the May 2009 term loan, we also entered into a Deed of Trust, Security Agreement and UCC Financing Statement for Fixture Filing (collectively, the “Deed of Trust”) creating a lien on such property.

Prior to entry into the New Agreement, we were not in compliance with the financial covenants of the original Credit Agreement as of December 31, 2009. However, the New Agreement provides for the waiver of such noncompliance and establishes new financial covenants in this regard. Beginning with the quarter ended June 30, 2010, and for each quarter thereafter, we are obligated to comply with the following financial covenants: (i) total debt to consolidated earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (“EBITDA”) of not greater than 3.0 to 1.0 (“Leverage Ratio”), consolidated EBITDA to consolidated net interest expense and principal payments on the total debt greater than 1.5 to 1.0 (“Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio”), and consolidated net worth after deducting other assets as are properly classified as “Intangible Assets”, plus 50 percent of net income, after provision for taxes (“Tangible Net Worth”) in excess of $15,000. The calculation of EBITDA, with regards to the Leverage Ratio and Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio, allows us to deduct certain non-cash items, specifically asset impairment charges as of December 31, 2009 and going forward. Historically, as of September 30, 2010, we were in compliance with all financial covenants under the New Agreement. However, due to the Restatement adjustments, Leverage Ratio and the Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio are out of compliance as of September 30, 2010. Under the New Agreement, we continue to have obligations for other covenants, including limitations on issuance of common stock, liens, transactions with affiliates, additional indebtedness and permitted investments, among others.

The New Agreement also removed a provision that permitted us to obtain additional indebtedness from a third party in the event Whitney declined to increase its commitment of indebtedness to us. As such, we expect to have to refinance the indebtedness outstanding under the New Agreement at any such time as we seek to obtain new financing from a third party. On April 28, 2010, we obtained a waiver from Whitney from a covenant provision in the New Agreement that prohibits us from committing to make an investment in or purchase any equity interest in another entity.

TD Bank Loan Agreement

During fiscal 2009, Flotation, our wholly-owned subsidiary, obtained loan proceeds from TD Bank in the principal amount of $2,160 (the “TD Bank Loan”). Under the terms of the TD Bank Loan, we are obligated to make payments in monthly installments of $15, with an initial payment on March 13, 2009 and a final payment of the unpaid principal and accrued interest in February 2029. The interest rate on the TD Bank Loan is 5.75 percent.

The TD Bank Loan is secured by Flotation’s operating premises in Biddeford, Maine under a mortgage and security agreement and a collateral assignment of leases and rents. The TD Bank loan required us to enter into a debt subordination agreement that subordinated any debt Flotation owes to Deep Down, other than accounts payable between them arising in the ordinary course of business. Additionally, the TD Bank Loan required a “negative pledge” that prohibits Flotation and Deep Down from granting security interests in Flotation’s personal property, other than such security interests granted in respect of our New Agreement with Whitney, as appropriate.

Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements

(Amounts in thousands except per share amounts)

Under the TD Bank Loan, we are required to meet certain covenants and restrictions. The financial covenants are reportable annually beginning with the year ended December 31, 2009, and are specific to the Flotation subsidiary financials. The TD Bank Loan financial covenants include maintaining debt service coverage ratios, pre and post distributions, which are ratios of Flotation’s earnings after tax plus interest, depreciation, amortization and distributions to consolidated net interest expense and principal payments on the total debt, below 1.5 to 1.0 and including distributions of 2.0 to 1.0, and consolidated net worth after deducting other assets as are properly classified as “Intangible Assets” (“Tangible Net Worth”) in excess of $9,500. Other covenants include limitations on issuance of liens, transactions with affiliates, and additional indebtedness among others. At December 31, 2009, we were not in compliance with the financial covenants, and on April 15, 2010, we obtained a waiver for these covenants as of December 31, 2009.

Other Debt

We have a subordinated debenture with a principal amount of $500 which originated from the exchange of preferred stock in a prior year. The debenture has a fixed interest rate of 6.0 percent per annum, which is required to be paid annually beginning March 31, 2009 through maturity on March 31, 2011, when the unpaid principal balance is due.

Note 12 : Private Placement

Between April 25 and April 30, 2010, we sold 5,150 shares of our common stock in a private placement to accredited investors at a per-share price of $0.10 resulting in total proceeds of $501, net of $14 applied to an outstanding vendor invoice for services provided, which we used for working capital purposes.

Note 13 : Share-based Compensation

We have a share-based compensation plan, the “2003 Directors, Officers and Consultants Stock Option, Stock Warrant and Stock Award Plan” (the “Plan”) which authorizes the grants of warrants, options, restricted common or convertible preferred stock and other equity awards (“Equity Awards”). Share-based compensation is recognized as provided under the applicable authoritative guidance which requires all share-based payments to employees, including grants of employee stock options, to be recognized as compensation expense over the requisite service period (generally the vesting period) in the financial statements based on their fair values. The impact of forfeitures that may occur prior to vesting is also estimated and considered in the amount recognized. In addition, the realization of tax benefits in excess of amounts recognized for financial reporting purposes will be recognized as a financing activity. The options granted under the Plan have vesting periods that range from immediate vesting to vesting over five years, and the contract terms of the options granted are up to ten years. We expense all stock options on a straight-line basis, net of forfeitures, over the requisite expected service periods. Under the Plan, the total number of Equity Awards permitted is 15 percent of issued and outstanding common shares. Based on the shares of common stock outstanding at September 30, 2010, there were approximately 11,082 Equity Awards available for grant under the Plan as of that date.

Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements

(Amounts in thousands except per share amounts)

Restricted Stock

In May 2010, we granted 1,000 restricted shares, par value $0.001 per share for a total of $1, to an executive. The shares were valued at $0.0875 per share and vest over three years in equal tranches on the grant date anniversary, with continued employment; we are amortizing the related share-based compensation of $87.5 over the three-year requisite service period.

In May 2010, we granted 1,000 restricted shares, par value $0.001 per share for a total of $1, to an outside director. The shares were valued at $0.0875 per share and vest over three years in equal tranches on the grant date anniversary, with continued service on our Board of Directors; we are amortizing the related share-based compensation of $87.5 over the three-year requisite service period.

For the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, we recognized a total of $162 and $377, respectively, in share-based compensation related to all outstanding shares of restricted stock. The unamortized portion of the estimated fair value of restricted stock was $200 at September 30, 2010.

Summary of Stock Options

During the nine months ended September 30, 2010, we granted 2,250 options. Additionally, a total of 2,000 option awards which were originally issued on February 14, 2008 to executives were cancelled in March 2010 and not reissued; the related accelerated expense of $47 is included in the total share-based option expense noted below for the nine months ended September 30, 2010. During the nine months ended September 30, 2009, we revised the estimated rate of forfeitures to 30 percent from 0 percent based on the history of stock option cancellations and management’s estimates of expected future forfeiture rates, resulting in a reduction of share-based compensation expense of $116 for the three months ended September 30, 2009.

The total share-based compensation expense recognized for stock options for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009 was $452 and $266, respectively, which for 2009 is net of the forfeiture adjustment of $116. As of September 30, 2010, the unamortized portion of the estimated fair value of outstanding stock options was $787.

Note 14 : Income Taxes

Income tax expense during interim periods is based on applying the estimated annual effective income tax rate on interim period operations, which may vary from the statutory rate due to the impact of permanent items relative to our net income as well as by any valuation allowance recorded. We employ an asset and liability approach that results in the recognition of deferred tax liabilities and assets for the expected future tax consequences of temporary differences between the financial basis and the tax basis of those assets and liabilities. A valuation allowance is established when it is more likely than not that some of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. Although our future projections indicate that we may be able to realize some of these deferred tax assets in the future, due to the degree of uncertainty of these projections, Management has recorded a full valuation allowance.

We have recently received a Notice of Federal Tax Lien from the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) in an approximate amount of $573 for nonpayment of certain taxes. This claim relates primarily to 2007 and 2008 tax returns that were filed when the Company changed its tax year. As of the filing date of this Form 10-Q/ A , there are differences between the IRS’ understanding and our understanding of the application of taxes to the appropriate year. While we do not believe that these taxes are correctly owed, we paid this amount to the IRS in an effort to have the lien removed in the most expeditious manner. The IRS has indicated that the lien will be removed in the near term. We expect to receive either a full refund or a refund of the tax amount minus certain interest charges once this issue is resolved with the IRS.

Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements

(Amounts in thousands except per share amounts)

Note 15 : Related Party Transactions

Our board of directors and management recognize that related person transactions present a heightened risk of conflicts of interest, and therefore we review all relationships and transactions in which we and our directors, director nominees and executive officers or their immediate family members, as well as holders of more than 5 percent of any class of our voting securities and their family members, have a direct or indirect material interest. As required under SEC rules, transactions that are determined to be directly or indirectly material to us or a related person are disclosed in the appropriate annual and/or quarterly statements filed with the SEC.

Ronald E. Smith, President, CEO and Director of Deep Down and Eugene Butler, Executive Chairman of Deep Down, were partners in Ship and Sail, Inc. (“Ship and Sail”), a former vendor of Deep Down. During the nine months ended September 30, 2010, we made payments of $10 to Ship and Sail, and we expensed the prepaid balance of $38 as of December 31, 2009 during the first quarter of 2010. The payments and expense to Ship and Sail related to services provided by that entity for the support of the development of marine technology which is currently being marketed. Ship and Sail discontinued operations in mid-2010.

In January 2010, we loaned South Texas Yacht Services, a vendor of Deep Down, $100. The owner of South Texas Yacht Services was in a business alliance with Ship and Sail. The note receivable, included in other assets on the unaudited consolidated balance sheet, bears interest at a rate of 5.5 percent per annum and monthly principal and interest payments in the amount of $2 commenced in April 2010. The final principal and interest payment is due March 24, 2015. As of November 19, 2010, the payments on this note were current. Additionally, as of September 30, 2010, South Texas Yacht Services is no longer a related party as they are no longer in a business alliance with Ship and Sail.

Additionally, during the nine months ended September 30, 2010, we recorded expenses to JUMA, a company owned by Ronald E. Smith, and his wife Mary L. Budrunas, Corporate Secretary and Director of Deep Down, in the amount of $28, of which $10 is included in accounts payable as of September 30, 2010. Payments relate to the monthly rental of a boat owned by JUMA, in connection with the development of marine technology as discussed above. The board of directors approved the arrangement between JUMA and Deep Down with a termination date of December 31, 2010.

Note 16 : Commitments and Contingencies

Litigation

Periodically, we are involved in legal proceedings arising from the normal course of business. As of the date of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/ A , we are not involved in any material pending legal proceedings.

Operating Leases

We lease certain offices, facilities, equipment and vehicles under non-cancellable operating and capital leases expiring at various dates through 2016.

Letters of Credit

Certain customers could require us to issue a standby letter of credit in the normal course of business to ensure performance under terms of the contract and with associated vendors and subcontractors. In the event of default, the creditor could demand payment from the issuing bank for the amount of the L/C. Our New Agreement with Whitney provides for L/Cs, as discussed in Note 11 , Long-Term Debt. During the year ended December 31, 2009, we issued a $1,107 irrevocable transferrable standby L/C in the normal course of business, with an annual commission rate of 2.4 percent. This L/C was renewed on September 1, 2010 for one year under the same terms and remains outstanding under the New Agreement as of September 30, 2010.

Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements

(Amounts in thousands except per share amounts)

Note 17 : Earnings per Common Share

Basic earnings per share (“EPS”) is calculated by dividing net income (loss) by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted EPS is calculated by dividing net income (loss) by the weighted-average number of common shares and dilutive common stock equivalents (warrants, stock awards and stock options) outstanding during the period. Dilutive EPS reflects the potential dilution that could occur if options to purchase common stock were exercised for shares of common stock. There were no potentially dilutive securities for the three or nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009 that were excluded from the computation of diluted earnings per share because their effect would have been anti-dilutive or the exercise price for the outstanding warrants and options exceeded the average market price for our common stock.

The effects of the Restatement to the Company's previously reported net loss for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010 in the amounts of $1,023 and $1,433, respectively, caused an increase in net loss per share of $0.00 and $0.01, respectively.

Note 18 : Subsequent Events

On May 3, 2010, we announced the execution of a Stock Purchase Agreement, effective as of May 3, 2010 (the “Purchase Agreement”), by and among Deep Down, Cuming Corporation, a Massachusetts corporation (“Cuming”), and the stockholders of Cuming (the “Selling Stockholders”), pursuant to which we have agreed to purchase all of the issued and outstanding shares of Cuming’s common stock (the “Acquisition”) for a purchase price of $47,000 (less an amount of certain liabilities to be assumed, estimated to be an approximate amount of $13,000 based upon Cuming’s balance sheet as of December 31, 2009 and further subject to a purchase price adjustment for working capital) (“Cash Price”), plus 25,000 shares of common stock of Deep Down to be delivered to the Selling Stockholders at the closing. Upon the signing of the Purchase Agreement, Deep Down and the Selling Stockholders entered into an Escrow Agreement (the “Escrow Agreement”) pursuant to which Deep Down has deposited with an escrow agent approximately 18,000 shares of its common stock (“Escrowed Stock”) to be (i) delivered to the Selling Stockholders if Deep Down does not meet certain conditions and the Purchase Agreement is terminated or (ii) applied against Deep Down’s obligation to deliver 25,000 shares of common stock at closing. Such shares were valued at the closing stock price of $0.049 as of September 30, 2010, for a total value of $882, which is recorded on the deposit line on the accompanying balance sheet.

Consummation of the Acquisition is subject to certain conditions, including the following (among other customary conditions for a transaction of this type):

●	Deep Down’s obtaining cash funds necessary to close the transaction;

●	certain employees of Cuming shall have entered into new employment agreements;

●	Cuming’s entering into a new lease agreement for its main manufacturing facility in Avon, Massachusetts;

●

an environmental assessment of Cuming’s main properties does not indicate circumstances or conditions which could result in (i) any criminal prosecution of Cuming, any of its subsidiaries or any director, officer or employee, or (ii) any suspension or closure of operations at Cuming’s main facilities;

●	the absence of any order or injunction prohibiting the consummation of the Acquisition; and

●	subject to certain exceptions, the accuracy of representations and warranties with respect to Deep Down’s or Cuming’s business, as applicable.

The Purchase Agreement contains customary representations and warranties that the parties have made to each other. The Purchase Agreement also contains standard indemnification provisions that require the indemnifying party to pay for any losses in excess of $500 that result from the failure of any representation or warranty to be true and correct. The indemnification is subject to a cap of $25,000 other than for certain fundamental representations and warranties (for which case there is no capped limitation). At closing a portion of the Cash Price will be deposited in an escrow account for purposes of the purchase price adjustment and for potential indemnity claims.

Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements

(Amounts in thousands except per share amounts)

Under terms of the Purchase Agreement, either of Deep Down or the Selling Stockholders may terminate the Purchase Agreement if the Acquisition is not completed by June 30, 2010, provided the party wishing to terminate is not in breach of the Purchase Agreement. In the event of a termination of the Purchase Agreement as a result of a breach of our obligations under the Purchase Agreement or inability to obtain funds to pay the Cash Price, the escrow agent will release the Escrowed Stock to the Selling Stockholders. If the Purchase Agreement is terminated by either Deep Down or Cuming under certain circumstances the parties will be obligated to reimburse the other’s expenses incurred in connection with the transactions contemplated by the Purchase Agreement in an aggregate amount not to exceed $275.

On July 13, 2010, Deep Down entered into an Amendment No. 1 to the Purchase Agreement, by and among Deep Down, Cuming and the Selling Stockholders (the “First Amendment”) dated effective as of June 30, 2010, to provide for an extension of the date on which Deep Down or the Selling Stockholders may terminate the Purchase Agreement. The Amendment provided that either of Deep Down or the Selling Stockholders may terminate the Purchase Agreement if the Acquisition is not completed by July 31, 2010, provided the party wishing to terminate is not in breach of the Purchase Agreement.

On October 4, 2010, Deep Down entered into an Amendment No. 2 to the Purchase Agreement, by and among Deep Down, Cuming and the Selling Stockholders (the “Second Amendment”) dated effective as of July 31, 2010, to provide for an extension of the date on which Deep Down or the Selling Stockholders may terminate the Purchase Agreement. The Second Amendment provided that either of Deep Down or the Selling Stockholders may terminate the Purchase Agreement if the Acquisition is not completed by October 31, 2010, provided the party wishing to terminate is not in breach of the Purchase Agreement. The Second Amendment also revised the components of the purchase price from (a) approximately $37,000 in the form of a combination of cash and shares of Deep Down and the assumption of approximately $13,000 of net customer deposit liabilities based upon Cuming’s balance sheet as of December 31, 2009 to (b) a cash payment of $48,250 plus or less an amount for net customer deposit assets or net customer deposit liabilities respectively. As of October 31, 2010, Cuming estimated this additional adjustment amount to be a net customer deposit asset of approximately $1,900. Additionally, the Amendment increased the target net working capital from $9,100 to $17,350.

On November 3, 2010, Deep Down entered into an Amendment No. 3 to the Purchase Agreement, by and among Deep Down, Cuming and the Selling Stockholders (the “Third Amendment”) dated effective as of October 31, 2010, to provide for an extension of the date on which Deep Down or the Selling Stockholders may terminate the Purchase Agreement. The Third Amendment provided that either of Deep Down or the Selling Stockholders may terminate the Purchase Agreement if the Acquisition is not completed by November 30, 2010, provided the party wishing to terminate is not in breach of the Purchase Agreement.

We intend to finance the Acquisition with a combination of debt and equity and are actively engaged in negotiating terms for such types of financings.

On April 28, 2010, we obtained a waiver from Whitney from a covenant provision in the New Agreement that prohibits us from committing to make an investment in or purchase any equity interest in another entity.

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The following discussion and analysis provides information that management believes is relevant for an assessment and understanding of our results of operations and financial condition. This information should be read in conjunction with our audited historical consolidated financial statements which are included in our Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009 filed with the Commission on April 15, 2010 and our unaudited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included with this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A in Part I. Item 1.

Restatement

In this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A, we have restated our following previously filed unaudited consolidated financial statements and data (and related disclosures) (the “Restatement”):

1.	Unaudited consolidated balance sheet as of September 30, 2010 and the related unaudited consolidated statements of operations and cash flows and any related notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements located in Part I, Item 1 of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A; and

2.	Management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations as of and for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010, contained herein.

The Restatement resulted from an internal review which detected errors in our percentage of completion accounting model for revenue recognition pertaining to one of our key contracts. The following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operation incorporates the restated amounts. See “Explanatory Note” immediately preceding Part I of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A, Item 1 and Note 2, “Restatement of Previously Reported Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements,” Note 7, “Costs and Estimated Earnings in Excess of Billings on Uncompleted Contracts and Deferred Revenue,” Note 11 “Long Term Debt,” and Note 17, “Earnings per Common Share” of the notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements in Part I, Item 1 of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A for a detailed discussion of the review and effect of the Restatement.

The Company considered the effect of the error to be immaterial to the consolidated financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2009. Accordingly, the 2009 balances reflect the correction of an immaterial error that resulted in an increase of $639 to the amounts of billings in excess of costs and estimated earnings on uncompleted contracts and accumulated deficit as reported on our consolidated balance sheet in our December 31, 2009 Form 10-K. The unaudited consolidated statement of operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009 have also been adjusted to correct the immaterial effects of the error. The amounts of revenues and gross profit for both the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009 as presented in our September 30, 2009 Form 10-Q were reduced by $378, which resulted in a corresponding $378 increase to operating loss, loss before income taxes and net loss.

General

We are an oilfield services company specializing in complex deepwater and ultra-deepwater oil production distribution system support services, serving the worldwide offshore exploration and production industry. Our services and technological solutions include distribution system installation support and engineering services, umbilical terminations, loose-tube steel flying leads, flotation and drill riser buoyancy, remotely operated vehicles (“ROVs”) and related services. We support subsea engineering, installation, commissioning, and maintenance projects through specialized, highly experienced service teams and engineered technological solutions. Our primary focus is on more complex deepwater and ultra-deepwater oil production distribution system support services and technologies, used between the platform and the wellhead.

In Part I. Item 2 “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations”, all dollar and share amounts are in thousands unless otherwise indicated.

Industry and Executive Outlook

Business conditions in our industry, which began to improve globally during the second quarter of 2010, continued to show improvement during the third quarter of 2010. The financial markets, which are critical to the funding of the major offshore and deepwater projects, also continued to show some signs of stabilization and recovery and we continue to see an increase in our bidding activity. Our international operations continued to benefit from increased demand for our products and services primarily in Brazil and West Africa and we experienced higher equipment utilization and rentals in the Gulf of Mexico (“GOM”). These factors resulted in a 36 percent increase in our revenues during the third quarter 2010 compared to the third quarter last year.

In response to the April 20, 2010, Deepwater Horizon incident (the “GOM Incident”), the United States Department of the Interior, or the DOI, ordered a moratorium on all deepwater drilling on the Outer Continental Shelf, or OCS, effective May 30, 2010. This moratorium was lifted by the DOI on October 12, 2010. We do not expect to see drilling activity in the GOM return to levels that existed prior to GOM Incident for a significant period. The timing of a market recovery will depend upon several factors outside of our control including the securing of permits, among other required approvals, that are necessary prior to commencement of offshore operations and could impact our customers’ deepwater operations in the GOM. However, the impact on our operations due to the duration and severity of the industry downturn and the continued impact of the GOM Incident cannot be predicted with certainty.

In response to the GOM Incident, we, like several others in the industry, provided and will continue to provide our services and equipment to support the ongoing efforts related to this incident. There will undoubtedly be greater regulatory scrutiny and higher costs associated with finding and developing hydrocarbon reserves in deepwater, particularly in the GOM. Additionally, we believe that the international markets will be more important to our operations going forward as we continue our focus on Brazil and West Africa deepwater projects. The deepwater market remains one of the best frontiers for adding large hydrocarbon reserves with high production flow rates. We are well positioned to supply services and products required to support safe offshore and deepwater projects of our customers. Therefore, we anticipate demand for our deepwater services and products will continue to grow and we will continue to focus on this sector of the industry worldwide.

For the remainder of 2010, our focus remains on successful execution of our projects, obtaining new project awards and effective cash management.

Segments

Recent Events

On May 3, 2010, we announced the execution of a Stock Purchase Agreement, effective as of May 3, 2010 (the “Purchase Agreement”), by and among Deep Down, Cuming Corporation, a Massachusetts corporation (“Cuming”), and the stockholders of Cuming (the “Selling Stockholders”), pursuant to which we have agreed to purchase all of the issued and outstanding shares of Cuming’s common stock (the “Acquisition”) for a purchase price of approximately $47,000 (less an amount of certain liabilities to be assumed, estimated to be an approximate amount of $13,000 based upon Cuming’s balance sheet as of December 31, 2009 and further subject to a purchase price adjustment for working capital) (“Cash Price”), plus 25,000 shares of common stock of Deep Down to be delivered to the Selling Stockholders at the closing. Upon the signing of the Purchase Agreement, Deep Down and the Selling Stockholders entered into an Escrow Agreement (the “Escrow Agreement”) pursuant to which Deep Down has deposited with an escrow agent approximately 18,000 shares of its common stock (“Escrowed Stock”) to be (i) delivered to the Selling Stockholders if Deep Down does not meet certain conditions and the Purchase Agreement is terminated or (ii) applied against Deep Down’s obligation to deliver 25,000 shares of common stock at closing.

Consummation of the Acquisition is subject to certain conditions, including the following (among other customary conditions for a transaction of this type):

●	Deep Down’s obtaining cash funds necessary to close the transaction;

●	certain employees of Cuming shall have entered into new employment agreements;

●	Cuming’s entering into a new lease agreement for its main manufacturing facility in Avon, Massachusetts;

●

●	the absence of any order or injunction prohibiting the consummation of the Acquisition; and

●	subject to certain exceptions, the accuracy of representations and warranties with respect to Deep Down’s or Cuming’s business, as applicable.

Under the terms of the Purchase Agreement, either of Deep Down or the Selling Stockholders may terminate the Purchase Agreement if the Acquisition is not completed by June 30, 2010, provided the party wishing to terminate is not in breach of the Purchase Agreement. In the event of a termination of the Purchase Agreement as a result of a breach of our obligations under the Purchase Agreement or inability to obtain funds to pay the Cash Price, the escrow agent will release the Escrowed Stock to the Selling Stockholders. If the Purchase Agreement is terminated by either Deep Down or Cuming under certain circumstances the parties will be obligated to reimburse the other’s expenses incurred in connection with the transactions contemplated by the Purchase Agreement in an aggregate amount not to exceed $275.

We intend to finance the Acquisition with a combination of debt and equity and are actively engaged in negotiating terms for such types of financings.

On April 28, 2010, we obtained a waiver from Whitney National Bank relating to a covenant provision in the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement dated April 14, 2010 that prohibits us from committing to make an investment or purchase any equity interest in another entity.

Results of Operations

Three Months Ended September 30, 2010 Compared to Three Months Ended September 30, 2009

Revenues. Revenues increased by $2,362, or 29 percent, to $10,410 for the third quarter 2010 from $8,048 for the same quarter last year. The increase in revenues was due primarily to higher utilization of equipment, ROVs and personnel, increased equipment and tooling rentals, greater demand for engineered subsea projects (including installation support services) and increased manufacture of products for deepwater projects. The higher demand is attributable to the increased demand for our products and services primarily in Brazil and West Africa and higher equipment and personnel utilization and more rentals in the GOM.

Gross Profit. Gross profit increased $1,946 to $3,718 for the third quarter 2010, an increase of 110 percent over the same period of the prior year, reflecting an overall increase in the gross profit margin from 22 percent to 36 percent. The increase in gross profit and gross profit margin was due to the increased revenues described above and to the larger percentage of service rather than product revenue during the same period last year.

Selling, General and Administrative Expenses. Selling, general and administrative expenses (“SG&A”) include rent, utilities, general office expenses, insurance, personnel and other costs necessary to conduct business operations. SG&A for the third quarter 2010 was $3,224 compared to $3,585 for the same quarter last year; a decrease of $361, or 10 percent. Management began a company-wide cost reduction program during the third quarter of 2009 which is continuing during 2010. While we had reductions in payroll and related benefits of $261, non-cash share-based compensation of $161, office and utilities of $82 and net other SG&A of $210 during the third quarter 2010 compared to the third quarter of last year, these reductions were offset by an increase in accounting and legal fees of $153, advertising of $116, and expenses associated with the purchase of Cuming Corporation of $84.

Depreciation and amortization expense. While depreciation and amortization expense included in operating expenses remained relatively flat, depreciation included in cost of sales in the accompanying statements of operations increased $160 to $610 in the third quarter of 2010 as a result of the purchases of ROVs and other revenue-generating capital equipment during the latter half of 2009 and first half of 2010.

Goodwill impairment. As of September 30, 2010, we recognized an impairment to goodwill in the amount of $4,513 related to the Flotation and Mako reporting units. The Deep Down Delaware reporting unit did not have any impairment as of September 30, 2010 since the fair value of that reporting unit exceeded the carrying value by 11 percent. Goodwill allocated to Deep Down Delaware was $4,472 at September 30, 2010. See further discussion of the related analysis in Note 9 to the unaudited consolidated financial statements included in this Form 10-Q/ A . There are a number of assumptions underlying the goodwill valuation. Should the results of operations decline, this could have a negative effect on the assumptions.

Net interest expense. Net interest expense for the third quarter 2010 was $124 compared to $115 for the same prior year period. Net interest expense for each period was generated by our outstanding bank debt, capital leases and subordinated debenture, offset by interest income on cash balances.

Income tax expense. For the third quarter 2010, we have recorded a full valuation allowance of our deferred tax assets.

Adjusted EBITDA. Our management evaluates our performance based on a non-GAAP measure, Adjusted EBITDA, which consists of earnings (net income or loss) available to common shareholders before cumulative effect of accounting change, net interest expense, income taxes, non-cash stock compensation expense, non-cash impairments, depreciation and amortization and other non-cash items (“Adjusted EBITDA”). This measure may not be comparable to similarly titled measures employed by other companies and is not a measure of performance calculated in accordance with U.S. GAAP. The measure should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for operating income, net income or loss, cash flows provided by operating, investing or financing activities, or other cash flow data prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP. The amounts included in the Adjusted EBITDA calculation, however, are derived from amounts included in the accompanying unaudited consolidated statements of operations data.

We believe Adjusted EBITDA is useful to an investor in evaluating our operating performance because it is widely used by investors in our industry to measure a company’s operating performance without regard to items such as income taxes, net interest expense, depreciation and amortization, and non-cash stock compensation expense which can vary substantially from company to company depending upon accounting methods and book value of assets, financing methods, capital structure and the method by which assets were acquired; it helps investors more meaningfully evaluate and compare the results of our operations from period to period by removing the impact of our capital structure (primarily interest) and asset base (primarily depreciation and amortization) and actions that do not affect liquidity (stock compensation expense and goodwill impairment) from our operating results; and it helps investors identify items that are within our operational control. Depreciation and amortization charges, while a component of operating income, are fixed at the time of the asset purchase or acquisition in accordance with the depreciable lives of the related asset and as such are not a directly controllable period operating charge.

The following is a reconciliation of net loss to Adjusted EBITDA for the three months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009:

	Three Months Ended
	September 30,
	2010			2009
	(As restated)
Net loss	$	(4,388	)	$	(2,468	)
Add back interest expense, net of interest income		124			115
Add back depreciation and amortization expense		1,029			865
Add back income tax expense		21			129
Add back stock based compensation - non-cash		160			321
Add back goodwill impairment - non-cash		4,513			-
Adjusted EBITDA	$	1,459		$	(1,038	)

Adjusted EBITDA for the third quarter 2010 was $1,459 compared to negative $1,038 for the same period last year. The improvement of $2,497 was primarily driven by the increase in revenues less cost of sales before depreciation expense of $2,106, lower SG&A expenses of $361 and higher other income, net, of $191.

Nine months Ended September 30, 2010 Compared to Nine months Ended September 30, 2009

Revenues. Revenues increased by $4,885, or 23 percent, to $26,236 for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 from $21,351 for the same period last year. The increase in revenues was due primarily to higher utilization of equipment, ROVs and personnel, increased equipment and tooling rentals, greater demand for engineered subsea projects (including installation support services) and increased manufacture of products for deepwater projects. The higher demand is attributable to the increased demand for our products and services primarily in Brazil and West Africa and higher equipment and personnel utilization and rentals in the GOM. Additionally, during the first nine months of 2010, our revenues benefited from customers commencing work that had previously been delayed, projects supporting the oil spill relief efforts and work related to the increased emphasis on inspection and safety as a result of the oil spill.

Gross Profit. Gross profit increased $2,902 to $8,840 for the nine months ended September 30, 2010, an increase of 49 percent over the same period of the prior year, reflecting an overall improvement in the gross profit margin from 28 percent to 34 percent. The increase in gross profit and gross profit margin was due to the increased revenues described above and to the revenue mix which included a larger percentage of service revenue rather than product revenue during the same period last year. The increase in the gross profit and gross profit percent was offset partially by the increase in depreciation expense related to revenue-generating capital equipment to $1,718 from $1,147 which was included in cost of sales in the accompanying statement of operations data (see further discussion below).

Selling, General and Administrative Expenses. Selling, general and administrative expenses (“SG&A”) include rent, utilities, general office expenses, insurance, personnel and other costs necessary to conduct business operations. SG&A for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 was $10,201 compared to $10,302 for the same period last year; a decrease of $101. Management began a company-wide cost reduction program during the third quarter of 2009 which is continuing during 2010. While we had reductions in payroll and related benefits of $617, office and utilities of $307, travel and related of $214 and net other SG&A of $231 during the nine months ended September 30, 2010 compared to the same period last year, this reduction was offset by an increase in accounting and legal fees of $274 and expenses associated with the purchase of Cuming Corporation of $408. Additionally, during the nine months ended September 30, 2009, we reversed an accrual of $586 for registration penalty expense that was accrued during fiscal 2008. The reversal resulted from the Company receiving a different interpretation of the penalty clause in the 2008 private placement.

Depreciation and amortization expense. While depreciation and amortization expense included in operating expenses remained relatively flat, depreciation included in cost of sales in the accompanying statements of operations increased $571 to $1,718 for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 as a result of the purchases of ROVs and other revenue-generating capital equipment during the latter half of 2009 and first half of 2010.

Net interest expense. Net interest expense for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 was $397 compared to $227 for the same prior year period. Net interest expense for each period was generated by our outstanding bank debt, capital leases and subordinated debenture, offset by interest income on cash balances.

Income tax expense. For the nine months ended September 30, 2010, we have recorded a full valuation allowance of our deferred tax assets.

Adjusted EBITDA. Our management evaluates our performance based on a non-GAAP measure, Adjusted EBITDA, which consists of earnings (net income or loss) available to common shareholders before cumulative effect of accounting change, net interest expense, income taxes, non-cash stock compensation expense, non-cash impairments, depreciation and amortization and other non-cash items. This measure may not be comparable to similarly titled measures employed by other companies and is not a measure of performance calculated in accordance with U.S. GAAP. The measure should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for operating income, net income or loss, cash flows provided by operating, investing or financing activities, or other cash flow data prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP. The amounts included in the Adjusted EBITDA calculation, however, are derived from amounts included in the accompanying unaudited consolidated statements of operations data.

The following is a reconciliation of net loss to Adjusted EBITDA for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009:

	Nine Months Ended
	September 30,
	2010			2009
	(As restated)
Net loss	$	(7,386	)	$	(4,959	)
Add back interest expense, net of interest income		397			227
Add back depreciation and amortization expense		3,019			2,389
Add back income tax expense (benefit)		59			(859	)
Add back stock based compensation - non-cash		614			643
Add back goodwill impairment - non-cash		4,513			-
Adjusted EBITDA	$	1,216		$	(2,559	)

Adjusted EBITDA for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 was $1,216 compared to negative $2,559 for the same period last year. The $3,775 improvement was primarily driven by the increase revenues less cost of sales before depreciation expense of $3,473, higher other income, net, of $230, and lower SG&A expenses of $101.

Capital Resources and Liquidity

Overview

The Whitney New Agreement becomes due on April 15, 2011 and we will need to raise additional debt or equity capital or renegotiate the existing debt prior to the expiration date. Therefore, we are currently in discussions with several lenders who have expressed interest in refinancing our debt. Our plan is to refinanced debt under the Whitney New Agreement in conjunction with obtaining financing to consummate the purchase of Cuming Corporation. We cannot provide any assurance that any financing will be available to us in the future on acceptable terms or at all. If we are unable to raise additional capital or renegotiate our existing debt, this would have a material adverse impact on our business or would raise substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern. Historically, as of September 30, 2010, we were in compliance with all financial covenants under the New Agreement. However, due to the Restatement adjustments, the leverage ratio and the fixed charge coverage ratio are out of compliance as of September 30, 2010. Under the terms of the New Agreement, Whitney could accelerate and immediately require all amounts outstanding under the New Agreement to become due on the basis of such noncompliance.

Although we believe that we will have adequate liquidity to meet our future operating requirements, if our planned financial results are achieved, and we will be able to raise additional capital or renegotiate our existing debt, the factors described above create uncertainty.

As of December 31, 2009, Flotation was not in compliance with its covenant obligations under the TD Bank loan. The noncompliance with such covenants under either of the Credit Agreement with Whitney and the loan agreement with TD Bank would constitute cross defaults for purposes of the other debt facility. Flotation obtained a waiver of its noncompliance so that such cross default did not occur with respect to our fiscal quarter ended December 31, 2009. Compliance testing is required only at year end so no compliance test was performed at September 30, 2010. Indebtedness outstanding under the TD bank loan was $2,079 at September 30, 2010.

Cash Flow from Operating Activities

During the nine months ended September 30, 2010, cash provided by operating activities was $4,704 as compared to $4,606 during the same prior year period. Cash flow from operating activities was impacted by a $2,427 increase in net loss, which was offset by a decrease in accounts receivable of $4,132. Non-cash depreciation and amortization increased by $630 compared to the prior year period due to property, plant and equipment purchases in late 2009 and 2010, and we recorded a non-cash impairment of goodwill of $4,513 during the nine months ended September 30, 2010.

Cash Flow from Investing Activities

During the nine months ended September 30, 2010, cash used in investing activities was $1,806 compared to $5,845 during the same period last year. During the nine months ended September 30, 2010, we used $1,693 to purchase property and equipment and $245 for capitalized software. For the nine months ended September 30, 2009, we used $5,536 to purchase property and equipment related to plant improvements and the purchase of ROVs, plus $383 for capitalized software.

Cash Flow from Financing Activities

During the nine months ended September 30, 2010, cash used for financing activities was $171 which represented net proceeds from the sale of stock of $501, offset by $672 in principal payments on long term debt. During the nine months ended September 30, 2009, cash provided by financing activities was $2,640 which consisted of borrowings of $3,000 and principle payments of $360.

Critical Accounting Policy Updates

The discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations is based on our unaudited consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. The preparation of these financial statements in accordance with US GAAP requires us to make estimates and judgments that may affect assets and liabilities. On an on-going basis, we evaluate our estimates, including those related to revenue recognition and related allowances, costs and estimated earnings incurred in excess of billings on uncompleted contracts, inventory, impairments of long-lived assets, including intangible assets, impairments of goodwill, income taxes including the valuation allowance for deferred tax assets, billings in excess of costs and estimated earnings on uncompleted contracts; contingencies and litigation, and share-based payments. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.

See Note 4 , “Recent Accounting Pronouncements”, in the notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements for information regarding recently issued accounting standards.

Refer to Part II. Item 7 “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations”, in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 for a discussion of our Critical Accounting Policies.

Inflation and Seasonality

We do not believe that our operations are significantly impacted by inflation. Our business is not significantly seasonal in nature.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We have no off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on our financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources that is material to investors.

ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures. We carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)). Based upon that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that as of September 30, 2010, due to the material weaknesses described below, our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed in reports filed under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the required time periods and is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

Our management, including our Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer, does not expect that our disclosure controls and procedures or our internal controls will prevent all error or fraud. A control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. Further, the design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Due to the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, have been detected.

Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. Management identified the following material weaknesses as of September 30, 2010:

We did not maintain effective monitoring controls. Specifically, we did not have sufficient personnel with an appropriate level of technical accounting knowledge, experience, and training who could execute appropriate monitoring and review controls, particularly in situations where transactions were complex or non-routine. This material weakness contributed to the additional material weaknesses discussed below.

We did not have adequate controls to provide reasonable assurance that revenue was recorded in accordance with GAAP. Specifically, we did not have appropriately designed or effectively operating management review controls performed by individuals with appropriate technical expertise to ensure that the accounting for contracts under the percentage-of-completion method was appropriate. This material weakness resulted in material errors that caused a restatement of our interim financial statements for the fiscal quarterly periods ended March 31, 2010, June 30, 2010, and September 30, 2010.

We did not have an adequate internal control designed to prevent or detect and correct erroneous information in their project cost accounting application. This material weakness resulted in material errors that caused a restatement of our interim financial statements for the fiscal quarterly periods ended March 31, 2010, June 30, 2010, and September 30, 2010.

Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. During the quarter ended September 30, 2010, Management did not implement any changes to our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) which have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

Management’s remediation plans. In our efforts to continuously improve our internal controls, management has taken steps to enhance the following controls and procedures, subsequent to September 30, 2010 as part of our remediation efforts in addressing the material weaknesses above:

During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2010 and into 2011, Management has increased review of the processes related to the recognition of revenue accounted for under the percentage of completion methodology, including the timely review of cost estimates at completion for percentage of completion contracts. Effective with the Restatement and during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2010, Management corrected the errors identified in the labor and burden rates applied to the project costs used in the percentage of completion accounting model.

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

Periodically, we are involved in legal proceedings arising in the normal course of business. As of the date of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/ A , we are currently not involved in any pending, material legal proceedings.

ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS

Between April 25 and April 30, 2010, we sold 5,150,000 shares of our common stock in a private placement to accredited investors, who purchased in reliance on the exemption from registration in Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, at a per-share price of $0.10 resulting in total proceeds of $501,000, net of $14,000 applied to an outstanding vendor invoice for services provided. We did not use an underwriter for this private placement. The proceeds were used for working capital purposes; the private placement closed April 30, 2010. Investors in this private placement included certain related parties; however, no purchases by any individual investor equaled or exceeded $120,000 in this private placement.

ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION

None.

ITEM 6. EXHIBITS

Exhibits required to be attached by Item 601 of Regulation S-K are listed in the Index of Exhibits of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/ A , which is incorporated herein by reference.

3.1	Articles of Incorporation of Deep Down, Inc. (conformed to include the amendment of the Articles of Incorporation filed with the Secretary of State of the State of Nevada on September 29, 2008) (incorporated by reference from Exhibit A to our Schedule 14C filed on November 12, 2008).

3.2	Amended and Restated ByLaws of Deep Down, Inc. (incorporated by reference from Exhibit B to our Schedule 14C filed on November 12, 2008).

10.1

Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, entered into as of April 14, 2010, between Deep Down, Inc., as borrower, and Whitney National Bank, including the Guarantor’s Consent and Agreement as signed on behalf of ElectroWave USA, Inc., Flotation Technologies, Inc., Mako Technologies, LLC and Deep Down, Inc. (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.31 to our Form 10-K filed with the Commission on April 15, 2010).

10.2	Amendment No. 1 to Stock Purchase Agreement, dated effective as of June 30, 2010, among Deep Down, Inc., Cuming Corporation and the Selling Stockholders named therein (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.1 to our Form 8-K filed on July 14, 2010).

10.3	Amendment No. 2 to Stock Purchase Agreement, dated effective as of July 31, 2010, among Deep Down, Inc., Cuming Corporation and the Selling Stockholders named therein (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.1 to our Form 8-K filed on October 8, 2010).

10.4	Amendment No. 3 to Stock Purchase Agreement, dated effective as of October 31, 2010, among Deep Down, Inc., Cuming Corporation and the Selling Stockholders named therein (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.1 to our Form 8-K/A filed on November 9, 2010).

31.1*

Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

31.2*

Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

32.1*

Section 1350 Certification of the President and Chief Executive Officer of Deep Down, Inc.

32.2*

Section 1350 Certification of the Chief Financial Officer of Deep Down, Inc.

________________

* Filed or furnished herewith.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

DEEP DOWN, INC.

(Registrant)


Signature	Title	Date

/s/ RONALD E. SMITH	President, CEO and Director	March 8, 2011
Ronald E. Smith	(Principal Executive Officer)

/s/ EUGENE L. BUTLER	Chief Financial Officer	March 8, 2011
Eugene L. Butler	(Principal Financial Officer)

INDEX TO EXHIBITS

3.1	Articles of Incorporation of Deep Down, Inc. (conformed to include the amendment of the Articles of Incorporation filed with the Secretary of State of the State of Nevada on September 29, 2008) (incorporated by reference from Exhibit A to our Schedule 14C filed on November 12, 2008).

3.2	Amended and Restated ByLaws of Deep Down, Inc. (incorporated by reference from Exhibit B to our Schedule 14C filed on November 12, 2008).

10.1

10.2	Amendment No. 1 to Stock Purchase Agreement, dated effective as of June 30, 2010, among Deep Down, Inc., Cuming Corporation and the Selling Stockholders named therein (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.1 to our Form 8-K filed on July 14, 2010).

10.3	Amendment No. 2 to Stock Purchase Agreement, dated effective as of July 31, 2010, among Deep Down, Inc., Cuming Corporation and the Selling Stockholders named therein (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.1 to our Form 8-K filed on October 8, 2010).

10.4	Amendment No. 3 to Stock Purchase Agreement, dated effective as of October 31, 2010, among Deep Down, Inc., Cuming Corporation and the Selling Stockholders named therein (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.1 to our Form 8-K/A filed on November 9, 2010).

31.1*

Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

31.2*

Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

32.1*

Section 1350 Certification of the President and Chief Executive Officer of Deep Down, Inc.

32.2*

Section 1350 Certification of the Chief Financial Officer of Deep Down, Inc.

________________

* Filed or furnished herewith.

Attached files

Deep Down, Inc. Reports

Also read