Exhibit 99.1

REALOGY REPORTS RESULTS FOR FULL YEAR 2010

Real Estate Leader Posts Net Revenue of $4.1 Billion in 2010,

Successfully Completed Debt Refinancing Transactions and

Continues to Focus on Strategic Growth

PARSIPPANY, N.J., March 4, 2011 – Realogy Corporation, a global leader in real estate and relocation services, today reported results for the full year ended December 31, 2010. Realogy’s net revenue for the year was $4.1 billion, an increase of 4% compared to 2009. The growth is attributed to an increase in the average sales price of homes sold by our franchisees and owned real estate offices as well as the impact of the January 2010 acquisition of Primacy Relocation. Reported EBITDA for the year was $835 million. EBITDA before restructuring and other items for the year was $534 million, an increase of $107 million, or 25%, year-over-year. For the year, Realogy recorded a net loss attributable to the Company of $99 million.

“In spite of another difficult year in housing and the economy, management remained highly focused on our strategic growth initiatives,” said Richard A. Smith, Realogy’s chief executive officer. “The Realogy Franchise Group increased its domestic franchise sales by 56% in 2010 compared to 2009, adding new franchisees and sales associates with $332 million in franchisee gross commission income (GCI). NRT, our owned brokerage company, added $60 million of annualized GCI through the acquisition of nine companies encompassing 23 offices and more than 1,000 sales associates. Cartus strengthened its position as a global provider of relocation services through the acquisition of Primacy, as well as adding more than 140 new clients and expanding relationships with approximately 300 of its existing clients. Title Resource Group continued to develop both its lender channel and title underwriting business, further diversifying its revenue base.”

Looking at Realogy’s core business drivers, both RFG and NRT outperformed the national market in terms of average sales price. Due to our mix of business, the average home sale price increased at both RFG and NRT in 2010 by 4% and 11% year-over-year, respectively, compared to the 1% increase in average home price reported by the National Association of Realtors (NAR). The number of home sale sides decreased 6% year-over-year at the Realogy Franchise Group (RFG) and decreased 7% at NRT, the company-owned brokerage unit. These results were consistent with the 5% decrease in existing domestic home sale units reported by NAR. Cartus experienced a 29% increase in relocation initiations primarily due to increased volume from corporate clients principally from the Primacy Relocation acquisition. Title Resource Group had a 5% increase in the average price per closing unit, which was offset by an 11% decrease in refinance title and closing units and a 10% decrease in its purchase title and closing units.

Industry forecasts from NAR and Fannie Mae continue to anticipate a weak first half of 2011 compared to 2010 for existing home sales. This is mainly because the first

half of 2010 had an atypical sales pattern due to the existence of the federal homebuyer tax credit that pulled forward sales from the third quarter of 2010. For the same reasons, industry forecasts project double-digit gains in the second half of 2011 in terms of year-over-year comparisons in home sales, which could offset the anticipated weak first half.

Balance Sheet Information and Covenant Compliance as of December 31, 2010

In February 2011, the Company successfully completed a series of refinancing transactions designed to improve Realogy’s capital structure and debt maturity profile. The highlights of the transactions include:

“These transactions have resulted in improved financial flexibility for our Company in the future,” said Anthony Hull, Realogy’s chief financial officer. “We believe our success in completing these transactions at a modest increase in our interest expense reflects both investor confidence in Realogy’s future and the strength of our business model.”

The Company ended 2010 with $166 million of readily available cash and no outstanding balance on its revolving credit facility under its senior secured credit agreement. There was $60 million outstanding as of March 1, 2011 due to normal seasonal activity. The Company expects these borrowings to be substantially repaid prior to the end of the first quarter.

A complete balance sheet is included as Table 2 of this press release.

As of December 31, 2010, the Company’s senior secured leverage ratio (SSLR) was 4.59 to 1, which is below the 5.0 to 1 maximum ratio required to be in compliance with its senior secured credit agreement. The SSLR is determined by dividing Realogy’s senior secured net debt of $2.9 billion at December 31, 2010 by the Company’s Adjusted EBITDA of $633 million for the 12 months ended December 31, 2010. After giving effect to the refinancing transactions completed in February 2011, the SSLR would have been 3.51 to 1 as of December 31, 2010. (Please see Table 8

for the definition of non-GAAP financial measures, Adjusted EBITDA and EBITDA before restructuring and other items and Tables 6 and 7 for a reconciliation of these non-GAAP measures to their most comparable GAAP financial measure, net loss attributable to Realogy.)

Investor Webcast

Realogy will hold a Webcast to review its full year 2010 results at 10:00 a.m. (EST) March 4th. The call will be hosted by Richard A. Smith, president and CEO, and Anthony E. Hull, executive vice president, CFO and treasurer. The conference call will be made available live via Webcast on the Investor Information section of the Realogy.com Web site. A replay of the Webcast will be available at www.realogy.com from March 4 through March 18.

About Realogy Corporation

Realogy Corporation, a global provider of real estate and relocation services, has a diversified business model that includes real estate franchising, brokerage, relocation and title services. Realogy’s world-renowned brands and business units include Better Homes and Gardens® Real Estate, CENTURY 21®, Coldwell Banker®, Coldwell Banker Commercial®, The Corcoran Group®, ERA®, Sotheby’s International Realty®, NRT LLC, Cartus and Title Resource Group. Collectively, Realogy’s franchise systems have approximately 14,700 offices and 264,000 sales associates doing business in 100 countries and territories around the world. Headquartered in Parsippany, N.J., Realogy is owned by affiliates of Apollo Management, L.P., a subsidiary of Apollo Global Management, LLC, a leading global alternative asset manager.

Forward-Looking Statements

Certain statements in this press release constitute “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Such forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors which may cause the actual results, performance or achievements of Realogy Corporation to be materially different from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Statements preceded by, followed by or that otherwise include the words “believes”, “expects”, “anticipates”, “intends”, “projects”, “estimates” and “plans” and similar expressions or future or conditional verbs such as “will”, “should”, “would”, “may” and “could” are generally forward-looking in nature and not historical facts. Any statements that refer to expectations or other characterizations of future events, circumstances or results are forward-looking statements.

Various factors that could cause actual future results and other future events to differ materially from those estimated by management include, but are not limited to: our substantial amount of outstanding debt; our ability to comply with the affirmative and negative covenants contained in our debt agreements; adverse developments or the absence of improvement in the residential real estate markets, including, but not limited to, the lack of sustained improvement in the number of home sales and/or further declines in home prices, low levels of consumer confidence, the impact of the ongoing or future recessions and related high levels of unemployment in the U.S. and abroad, continuing high levels of foreclosures, and reduced availability of mortgage financing or financing availability at rates not sufficiently attractive to homebuyers; the final resolution or outcomes with respect to Cendant’s contingent liabilities; adverse developments or the absence of sustained improvement in general business, economic and political conditions, including, but

not limited to, changes in short-term or long-term interest rates, or any outbreak or escalation of hostilities on a national, regional or international basis; government regulation as well as legislative, tax or regulatory changes that would adversely impact the residential real estate market, including but not limited to potential reform of the financing of the U.S. housing and mortgage markets; our failure to enter into or renew franchise agreements, maintain our brands or the inability of franchisees to survive the current real estate cycle; our inability to realize benefits from future acquisitions; our inability to sustain improvements in our operating efficiency; and our inability to access the capital and/or securitization markets.

Consideration should be given to the areas of risk described above, as well as those risks set forth under the headings “Forward-Looking Statements” and “Risk Factors” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 and in our other periodic reports filed from time to time, in connection with considering any forward-looking statements that may be made by us and our businesses generally. Except for our ongoing obligations to disclose material information under the federal securities laws, we undertake no obligation to release publicly any revisions to any forward-looking statements, to report events or to report the occurrence of unanticipated events unless we are required to do so by law.

This release includes certain non-GAAP financial measures as defined under SEC rules. As required by SEC rules, important information regarding such measures is contained in the Tables attached to this release.

Investor Contact:

Alicia Swift

(973) 407-4669

alicia.swift@realogy.com

Media Contact:

Mark Panus

(973) 407-7215

mark.panus@realogy.com

Table 1

REALOGY CORPORATION

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(In millions)

Table 2

REALOGY CORPORATION

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(In millions)

Table 3

REALOGY CORPORATION

2010 KEY DRIVERS

Table 4

REALOGY CORPORATION

2009 KEY DRIVERS

Table 5a

REALOGY CORPORATION

SELECTED 2010 FINANCIAL DATA

(In millions)

EBITDA by segment before restructuring and other items detailed above for the three months ended March 31, 2010 was: RFG $65 million, NRT ($31) million, Cartus $6 million, TRG ($4) million and Corporate ($14) million. EBITDA by segment before restructuring and other items detailed above for the three months ended June 30, 2010 was: RFG $123 million, NRT $86 million, Cartus $28 million, TRG $11 million and Corporate ($14) million. EBITDA by segment before restructuring and other items detailed above for the three months ended September 30, 2010 was: RFG $90 million, NRT $33 million, Cartus $51 million, TRG $8 million and Corporate ($9) million. EBITDA by segment before restructuring and other items detailed above for the three months ended December 31, 2010 was: RFG $74 million, NRT $4 million, Cartus $27 million, TRG $13 million and Corporate ($13) million. EBITDA by segment before restructuring and other items detailed above for the corresponding year ended December 31, 2010 was as follows: RFG $352 million, NRT $92 million, Cartus $112 million, TRG $28 million, and Corporate ($50) million.

Table 5b

REALOGY CORPORATION

SELECTED 2009 FINANCIAL DATA

(In millions)

EBITDA by segment before restructuring and other items detailed above for the three months ended March 31, 2009 was: RFG $45 million, NRT ($59) million, Cartus $5 million, TRG ($4) million and Corporate ($11) million. EBITDA by segment before restructuring and other items detailed above for the corresponding three months ended June 30, 2009 was as follows: RFG $86 million, NRT $29 million, Cartus $20 million, TRG $13 million, and Corporate $1 million. EBITDA by segment before restructuring and other items detailed above for the corresponding three months ended September 30, 2009 was as follows: RFG $108 million, NRT $61 million, Cartus $34 million, TRG $10 million, and Corporate ($15) million. EBITDA by segment before restructuring and other items detailed above for the corresponding three months ended December 31, 2009 was as follows: RFG $87 million, NRT $22 million, Cartus $18 million, TRG $4 million, and Corporate ($27) million. EBITDA by segment before restructuring and other items detailed above for the corresponding year ended December 31, 2009 was as follows: RFG $326 million, NRT $53 million, Cartus $77 million, TRG $23 million, and Corporate ($52) million.

Table 6

REALOGY CORPORATION

EBITDA AND ADJUSTED EBITDA

(In millions)

A reconciliation of net loss attributable to Realogy to EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA for the year ended December 31, 2010 is set forth in the following table:

Table 7

Reconciliation of net income (loss) attributable to Realogy to EBITDA before restructuring and other items (In millions)

A reconciliation of net income (loss) attributable to Realogy to EBITDA and EBITDA before restructuring and other items for the three and twelve months ended December 31, 2010 and 2009 are set forth in the following tables:

Table 8

Definitions

EBITDA is defined by us as net income before depreciation and amortization, interest (income) expense, net (other than relocation services interest for securitization assets and securitization obligations) and income taxes. EBITDA before restructuring and other items is defined by us as EBITDA adjusted for merger costs, restructuring costs, former parent legacy cost (benefit) items, net, and gain on extinguishment of debt as described in Table 7 above. Adjusted EBITDA is presented to demonstrate our compliance with the senior secured leverage ratio covenant in the senior secured credit facility. We present EBITDA, EBITDA before restructuring and other items and Adjusted EBITDA because we believe EBITDA, EBITDA before restructuring and other items and Adjusted EBITDA are useful as supplemental measures in evaluating the performance of our operating businesses and provides greater transparency into our results of operations. Our management, including our chief operating decision maker, use EBITDA and EBITDA before restructuring and other items as a factor in evaluating the performance of our business. EBITDA, EBITDA before restructuring and other items and Adjusted EBITDA should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for net income or other statement of operations data prepared in accordance with GAAP. See table 6 for a presentation of net income (loss) as calculated under GAAP and a reconciliation to our EBITDA, EBITDA before restructuring and other items and Adjusted EBITDA.

We believe EBITDA facilitates company-to-company operating performance comparisons by backing out potential differences caused by variations in capital structures (affecting net interest expense), taxation, the age and book depreciation of facilities (affecting relative depreciation expense) and the amortization of intangibles, which may vary for different companies for reasons unrelated to operating performance. We believe EBITDA before restructuring and other items also facilitates company-to-company operating performance comparisons by backing out those items in EBITDA as well as certain historical cost (benefit) items which may vary for different companies for reasons unrelated to operating performance. We further believe that EBITDA is frequently used by securities analysts, investors and other interested parties in their evaluation of companies, many of which present an EBITDA measure when reporting their results.

EBITDA and EBITDA before restructuring and other items have limitations as analytical tools, and you should not consider EBITDA or EBITDA before restructuring and other items either in isolation or as substitutes for analyzing our results as reported under GAAP. The limitations include the following:

Adjusted EBITDA as used herein corresponds to the definition of “EBITDA,” calculated on a “pro forma basis,” used in the senior secured credit facility to calculate the senior secured leverage ratio.

Like EBITDA and EBITDA before restructuring and other items, Adjusted EBITDA has limitations as an analytical tool, and you should not consider Adjusted EBITDA either in isolation or as a substitute for analyzing our results as reported under GAAP. In addition to the limitations described above with respect to EBITDA and EBITDA before restructuring and other items, Adjusted EBITDA includes pro forma cost savings, the pro forma effect of business optimization initiatives and the pro forma full year effect of acquisitions and new franchisees. These adjustments may not reflect the actual cost savings or pro forma effect recognized in future periods.

EBITDA, EBITDA before restructuring and other items and Adjusted EBITDA are not necessarily comparable to other similarly titled financial measures of other companies due to the potential inconsistencies in the method of calculation.