Attached files

file filename
EX-31.1 - EX-31.1 - CUBIC ENERGY INCa11-6491_1ex31d1.htm
EX-99.1 - EX-99.1 - CUBIC ENERGY INCa11-6491_1ex99d1.htm
EX-23.1 - EX-23.1 - CUBIC ENERGY INCa11-6491_1ex23d1.htm
EX-32.1 - EX-32.1 - CUBIC ENERGY INCa11-6491_1ex32d1.htm
EX-31.2 - EX-31.2 - CUBIC ENERGY INCa11-6491_1ex31d2.htm
EX-32.2 - EX-32.2 - CUBIC ENERGY INCa11-6491_1ex32d2.htm
EX-23.2 - EX-23.2 - CUBIC ENERGY INCa11-6491_1ex23d2.htm

Table of Contents

 

 

 

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

 

FORM 10-K / A

 

Amendment No. 2

 

ANNUAL REPORT

PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2010

 

COMMISSION FILE NUMBER 001-34144

 

CUBIC ENERGY, INC.

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)

 

TEXAS

 

87-0352095

(State of Incorporation)

 

(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

 

9870 PLANO ROAD, DALLAS, TEXAS 75238

(Address of Principal Executive Offices)

 

972-686-0369

(Registrant’s Telephone Number)

 

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

 

Title of Class

 

Name of Exchange on Which Registered

Common Stock, $0.05 par value

 

NYSE Amex, LLC

 

Securities registered under Section 12(g) of the Exchange Act: None

 

Indicate by check mark if registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes o  No x

 

Indicate by check mark if registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes o  No x

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x  No o

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes o  No o

 

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. x

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

 

Large accelerated filer o

 

Accelerated filer o

 

 

 

Non-accelerated filer o

 

Smaller reporting company x

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes o   No x

 

State the aggregate market value of the common stock, par value $0.05 per share, held by non-affiliates computed by reference to the price at which the common stock was last sold, or the average bid and asked prices of such common stock, as of the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter: As of December 31, 2009 aggregate market value held by non-affiliates was $41,423,927.

 

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the registrant’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date: As of September 8, 2010, there were 75,394,579 shares of Common Stock outstanding.

 

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE: None.

 

 

 



Table of Contents

 

Special note regarding forward-looking statements

 

This annual report on Form 10-K contains forward-looking statements, as defined in Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. All statements, other than statements of historical facts, are forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements relate to, among other things, the following: our future financial and operating performance and results; our business strategy; market prices; and our plans and forecasts.

 

Forward-looking statements are identified by use of terms and phrases such as “may,” “expect,” “estimate,” “project,” “plan,” “believe,” “intend,” “achievable,” “anticipate,” “will,” “continue,” “potential,” “should,” “could” and similar words and phrases. Although we believe that the expectations reflected in these forward-looking statements are reasonable, they do involve certain assumptions, risks and uncertainties. Our actual results could differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements. You should consider carefully the statements in the “Risk Factors” section of this report and other sections of this report, which describe factors that could cause our actual results to differ from those set forth in the forward-looking statements, including, but not limited to, the following factors:

 

·                   our ability to generate sufficient cash flow from operations, borrowings or other sources to enable us to service our debt and fully develop our undeveloped acreage positions;

 

·                   the volatility in commodity prices for oil and natural gas;

 

·                   the possibility that the industry may be subject to future regulatory or legislative actions (including additional taxes);

 

·                   the presence or recoverability of estimated oil and natural gas reserves and the actual future production rates and associated costs;

 

·                   the ability to replace oil and natural gas reserves;

 

·                   lease or title issues or defects to our oil and gas properties;

 

·                   environmental risks;

 

·                   drilling and operating risks;

 

·                   exploration and development risks;

 

·                   competition, including competition for acreage in natural gas producing areas;

 

·                   management’s ability to execute our plans to meet our goals;

 

·                   our ability to retain key members of senior management;

 

·                   our ability to obtain goods and services, such as drilling rigs and other oilfield equipment, and access to adequate gathering systems and pipeline take-away capacity, to execute our drilling program;

 

·                   general economic conditions, whether internationally, nationally or in the regional and local market areas in which we do business, may be less favorable than expected, including that the United States economic slow-down might continue to negatively affect the demand for natural gas, oil and natural gas liquids;

 

·                   continued hostilities in the Middle East and other sustained military campaigns or acts of terrorism or sabotage; and

 

·                   other economic, competitive, governmental, legislative, regulatory, geopolitical and technological factors that may negatively impact our business, operations or pricing.

 

All forward-looking statements are expressly qualified in their entirety by the cautionary statements in this paragraph and elsewhere in this document. Other than as required under the securities laws, we do not assume a duty to update these forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, subsequent events or circumstances, changes in expectations or otherwise.

 

ii



Table of Contents

 

CUBIC ENERGY, INC.

 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

 

 

Page

PART I

 

 

Item 1.

Business

1

Item 1A.

Risk Factors

20

Item 1B.

Unresolved Staff Comments

29

Item 2.

Properties

29

Item 3.

Legal Proceedings

29

Item 4.

( Removed and Reserved )

29

 

 

 

PART II

 

 

Item 5.

Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters, and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

30

Item 6.

Selected Financial Data

33

Item 7.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

34

Item 7A.

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

46

Item 8.

Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

46

Item 9.

Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

46

Item 9A.

Controls and Procedures

46

Item 9B.

Other Information

47

 

 

 

PART III

 

 

Item 10.

Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance

48

Item 11.

Executive Compensation

51

Item 12.

Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters

58

Item 13.

Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence

59

Item 14.

Principal Accountant Fees and Services

61

 

 

 

PART IV

 

 

Item 15.

Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules

64

 

iii



Table of Contents

 

PART I

 

Item 1.    Business.

 

GENERAL

 

Cubic Energy, Inc. (referred to as “Cubic”, “we”, “our”, “us” or the “Company”) is an independent energy company engaged in the development and production of, and exploration for, crude oil, natural gas and natural gas liquids. Our oil and gas assets are concentrated in Texas and Louisiana. At June 30, 2010, our total proved reserves were 29,209,160 Mcfe.

 

The Company’s future results of operations and growth are substantially dependent upon (i) its ability to acquire or find new oil and gas properties, or successfully develop existing oil and gas properties and (ii) the prevailing prices for oil and gas. Numerous locations have been identified by us and by third-party operators for additional drilling. If we are unable to economically complete additional producing wells, the Company’s oil and gas production, and thus its revenues, would likely decline rapidly as its reserves are depleted. In addition, oil and gas prices are dependent upon numerous factors beyond the Company’s control, such as economic, political, governmental, environmental and regulatory developments, as well as competition from other sources of energy. The oil and gas markets have historically been very volatile, and any further significant or extended decline in the price of oil or gas would have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial condition and results of operations, and could result in a further reduction in the carrying value of the Company’s proved reserves and adversely affect its access to capital.

 

Louisiana Acreage

 

Our corporate strategy with respect to our asset acquisition and development efforts was to position the Company in a low risk opportunity while building mainstream high yield reserves.  The acquisition of our acreage in DeSoto and Caddo Parishes, Louisiana, puts us in a reservoir rich environments in the Hosston, Cotton Valley and Bossier/Haynesville Shale formations, with additional shallow formations to exploit as well. We have had success on our acreage with wells completed in the Hosston, Cotton Valley and Bossier/Haynesville Shale formations.  We also own an interest in the right-of-ways, infrastructure and pipelines for our Caddo and DeSoto Parish, Louisiana acreage.

 

We share our Bossier/Haynesville formation acreage with Goodrich Petroleum Corporation (“Goodrich”), Chesapeake Energy Corporation (“Chesapeake”), El Paso Corporation (“El Paso”), British Gas Group (“BG”) and EXCO Operating Company, LP (“EXCO”), and all of these companies are third-party operators actively working on our shared acreage. As a result of this activity, we expect to see improving production volumes in the quarter ending September 30, 2010.

 

Our financial results depend upon our third-party Hosston, Cotton Valley and Bossier/Haynesville Shale operators along with many factors, which are largely driven by the volume of our natural gas production and the price that we receive for that production. Our natural gas production volumes will decline as reserves are depleted unless we obtain and expend capital in successful development and exploration activities or acquire properties with existing production. The amount we realize for our production depends predominantly upon commodity prices, which are affected by changes in market demand and supply, as impacted by overall economic activity, weather, pipeline capacity constraints, inventory storage levels, basis differentials and other factors. Accordingly, finding and developing oil and natural gas reserves at economical costs is critical to our long-term success.

 

As part of our strategic plan to restructure our debt and raise additional operating capital, during the second quarter of fiscal 2010, Wells Fargo expanded our credit facility to $45 million, which includes a $40,000,000 revolving credit facility and a $5,000,000 convertible term note. The revolving credit facility is subject to

 

1



Table of Contents

 

borrowing base limits, and as of June 30, 2010, the revolver had $25 million outstanding with a maturity date of July 1, 2012. Subsequent to June 30, 2010, our borrowing base and borrowings under the revolving credit facility were increased to $30 million. We also acquired $30.9 million in drilling credits, dedicated for the future drilling and completion of horizontal Haynesville Shale formation wells. For additional information, see below under “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations — Liquidity and Capital Resources”.

 

Management believes in the value of our assets, which are being drilled by third-party operators, and will continue to explore strategic alternatives that allow us to leverage those assets to gain full shareholder value.

 

Texas Acreage

 

Our Texas properties are situated in Eastland and Callahan Counties. The Texas properties consist primarily of wells acquired in several transactions between 1991 and 2002 and through overriding royalty interests reserved in farm-out agreements in 1998 and 1999. These wells produce limited amounts of natural gas and oil condensate.

 

HISTORY

 

Our predecessor was incorporated in October 1978. Cubic was incorporated in 1999 in the State of Texas. Our principal executive office is located at 9870 Plano Road, Dallas, Texas 75238, and our telephone number is (972) 686-0369.

 

In December 1997, we entered into a Stock Purchase Agreement (the “Agreement”) pursuant to which the Company issued 12,500,000 shares of our common stock in exchange for the conveyance to the Company of certain oil and gas properties by Calvin A. Wallen, III and his affiliates. In connection with the Agreement, three of the five members of the Board of Directors resigned and new directors were appointed, including Mr. Wallen, who also became President and CEO of the Company.

 

Prior to the Agreement, we focused primarily on the acquisition of non-operated working interests and overriding royalty interests in oil and gas properties. Subsequent to entering into the Agreement, we moved our headquarters from Tulsa, Oklahoma to Garland, Texas in order to utilize an affiliate’s assembled team of experienced management whose substantial expertise lay in acquisition, exploitation and development and the ability to manage both operated and non-operated oil and gas properties. In addition, after reviewing our existing property portfolio and refining our new business strategy, the management team initiated a divestment strategy to dispose of our non-strategic assets in non-core areas in order to concentrate on building core reserves. Pursuant to this strategy, we have acquired additional properties in our core areas, primarily in Louisiana, as well as pursuing an operated and a non-operated drilling program for the drilling of exploratory, development and infill wells, a strategy previously unavailable to us due to the technical expertise and experience required and the lack of available resources. We have made substantial progress in redirecting our strategic business efforts and believe that attractive opportunities remain for development of our remaining assets and acquisition of future assets.

 

On February 6, 2006, the Company entered into a Purchase Agreement with Tauren Exploration, Inc. (“Tauren”), an entity wholly owned by Mr. Wallen, with respect to the purchase by the Company of certain Cotton Valley leasehold interests (approximately 11,000 gross acres; 5,000 net acres) held by Tauren. Pursuant to the Purchase Agreement, the Company acquired from Tauren a 35% working interest in approximately 2,400 acres and a 49% working interest in approximately 8,500 acres located in DeSoto and Caddo Parishes, Louisiana, along with an associated Area of Mutual Interest (“AMI”) and the right to acquire at “cost” (as defined in the Purchase Agreement) a working interest in all additional mineral leases obtained by Tauren in the AMI, in exchange for (a) $3,500,000 in cash, (b) 2,500,000 shares of Company common stock, (c) an unsecured 12.5% short-term promissory note in the amount of $1,300,000, which note is convertible into Company common stock at a conversion price of $0.80 per share (the “Tauren Note”), and (d) a drilling credit of $2,100,000.

 

2



Table of Contents

 

On March 5, 2007, Cubic entered into a Credit Agreement with Wells Fargo Energy Capital (“Wells Fargo”) providing for a revolving credit facility of $20,000,000, subject to borrowing base limits, and a convertible term loan of $5,000,000 (the “Credit Facility”). In connection with entering into the Credit Facility, the Company issued to Wells Fargo warrants, with five-year expirations, for the purchase of up to 2,500,000 shares of Company common stock at an original exercise price of $1.00 per share. The revolving note is subject to a borrowing base (the “Borrowing Base”), initially set at $4,000,000. On July 27, 2007, Wells Fargo increased the Borrowing Base to $6,600,000 in order to fund the drilling and casing costs of two new wells in the Company’s Johnson Branch acreage in Caddo Parish, Louisiana. On September 7, 2007, Wells Fargo increased the Borrowing Base to $8,600,000 in order to fund the remaining drilling and casing costs of five wells drilled since the beginning of fiscal 2008, the drilling and casing costs of two new wells, and the costs of installing a gathering/sales line and associated equipment in the Company’s Johnson Branch acreage. On November 19, 2007, Wells Fargo increased the borrowing base to $14,500,000 in order to fund the completion costs and casing of eight wells already successfully drilled and the drilling of four additional wells located in the Company’s Johnson Branch acreage. On May 8, 2008, Wells Fargo increased the borrowing base to $20,000,000 in order to fund the completion costs and casing of the four recently-drilled wells located in the Company’s Johnson Branch acreage (including two vertical wells drilled into the Bossier/Haynesville shales) and the drilling of two additional wells located in the Company’s Bethany Longstreet acreage in Caddo and DeSoto Parishes. On December 18, 2009, the Company entered into a Second Amendment to Credit Agreement with Wells Fargo, providing for a revolving credit facility of up to $40 million and a convertible term loan of $5 million (the “Amended Credit Agreement”). The borrowing base under the revolving credit facility was initially established at $25 million. The indebtedness bears interest at a fluctuating rate equal to the sum of the Wells Fargo Bank prime rate plus two percent (2%) per annum, matures on July 1, 2012 and is secured by substantially all of the assets of the Company. In connection with entering into the Amended Credit Agreement, the Company issued to Wells Fargo additional warrants, expiring on December 1, 2014, for the purchase of up to 5,000,000 shares of Company common stock at an exercise price of $1.00 per share, and extended the expiration date of the warrants to purchase 2,500,000 shares of Company common stock that were previously issued to Wells Fargo to December 1, 2014.

 

The terms of the Credit Facility, among other things, prohibit the Company from merging with another company or paying dividends, and limit additional indebtedness, sales of certain assets and investments. Upon the repayment in full of the Credit Facility, and with respect to certain properties, upon the occurrence of the conditions set forth in Section 2.14 of the Credit Agreement, the Company agreed to convey a net profits interest to Wells Fargo in an amount equal to 5% of Cubic’s net interest in certain of its Louisiana properties.

 

On May 6, 2008, the Company issued a subordinated promissory note in the amount of $2,000,000 (the “Subordinated Note”) to Diversified Dynamics Corporation (the “Lender”), an entity controlled by William L. Bruggeman, Jr., who beneficially owns more than 5% of the common stock of the Company, and who subsequently became a director of the Company. The Subordinated Note bore interest at a fluctuating rate equal to the sum of the prime rate plus two percent (2%) per annum, and was scheduled to mature on April 30, 2010. As consideration for the loan made by the Lender pursuant to the Subordinated Note, the Company agreed to convey to the Lender, upon the repayment in full of the indebtedness evidenced by the Subordinated Note and the repayment in full of the senior indebtedness evidenced by the Credit Facility with Wells Fargo, an undivided 0.375% net profits interest in the future production of hydrocarbons from or attributable to Cubic’s net interest in its Louisiana properties. The proceeds of the Subordinated Note were used for general corporate and working capital purposes.

 

On November 24, 2009, the Company entered into transactions with Tauren and Langtry Mineral & Development, LLC (“Langtry”), both of which are entities controlled by Mr. Wallen, under which the

 

3



Table of Contents

 

Company acquired $30,952,810 in pre-paid drilling credits (the “Drilling Credits”) applicable towards the development of its Haynesville Shale rights in Northwest Louisiana. The Company will use the Drilling Credits to fund $30,952,810 of its share of the drilling and completion costs for those horizontal Haynesville Shale wells drilled in sections previously operated by an affiliate of the Company which are now operated by a third party.

 

As consideration for the Drilling Credits, the Company (a) conveyed to Tauren a net overriding royalty interest of approximately 2% in its leasehold rights below the Taylor Sand formation of the Cotton Valley and (b) issued to Langtry 10,350,000 Company common shares and preferred stock in the amount of $10,350,000, convertible at any time prior to the fifth anniversary of issuance into Company common shares at $1.20 per common share.  The preferred stock is entitled to cumulative dividends equal to 8% per annum, payable quarterly, which dividends may be paid in cash or in additional shares of preferred stock, in the Company’s discretion. The preferred stock may be redeemed by the Company at any time, at a redemption price equal to 20% over the original issue price.

 

On December 18, 2009, the Company issued a subordinated promissory note payable to Mr. Wallen, in the principal amount of $2,000,000 (the “Wallen Note”). This note bears interest at the prime rate plus one percent (1%), with interest payable monthly. The Wallen Note was entered into with the consent of Wells Fargo. The outstanding principal balance is due and payable on September 30, 2012 and is subordinated to the indebtedness under the Amended Credit Agreement. The proceeds of the Wallen Note were used to repay the Subordinated Note. The net profits interest described above was conveyed to the Lender in connection with the repayment.

 

STRATEGY

 

Our strategy with respect to our domestic exploration program seeks to maintain a balanced portfolio of drilling opportunities that range from lower risk, field extension wells to the smaller scale pursuit of Company appropriate higher risk, high reserve potential prospects. Our focus is primarily on exploration opportunities that can benefit from advanced technologies, including 3-D seismic, designed to reduce risks and increase success rates. We develop prospects in-house with an affiliate and through strategic alliances with exploration companies that have expertise in specific target areas. In addition, we evaluate some externally generated prospects and look to participate in some of these opportunities to enhance our portfolio.

 

We are currently focusing our domestic exploration activities to develop our undeveloped leasehold opportunities in Louisiana. Currently we have exploration opportunities and seek to acquire additional leasehold interests in Caddo and DeSoto Parishes in Louisiana.  These areas are a part of geologic studies utilizing regional trend surface analysis, 2-D and 3-D seismic data and/or vast sub-surface control. Prospects have been developed from approximately 4,000 to 12,000 feet in depth in the following reservoirs: Bossier/Haynesville shales; Cotton Valley; Hosston; Gloyd; Pettet; Glen Rose and Paluxy.

 

4



Table of Contents

 

PRINCIPAL OIL AND GAS PROPERTIES

 

The following table summarizes certain information with respect to our principal areas of operation at June 30, 2010:

 

 

 

Proved Reserves

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Oil & Natural

 

 

 

Total Gas

 

Percent

 

Present Value

 

 

 

Gas Liquids

 

Gas

 

Equivalent

 

of Proved

 

(Discounted

 

Area

 

(Bbls)

 

(Mcf)

 

(Mcfe)

 

Reserves

 

@ 10%)

 

Louisiana

 

8,647

 

29,157,280

 

29,209,160

 

100.0

%

$

64,757,290

 

Texas

 

 

 

 

0.0

%

 

Total

 

8,647

 

29,157,280

 

29,209,160

 

100.0

%

$

64,757,290

 

 

Our Texas properties are situated in Eastland and Callahan Counties and represent an immaterial amount and are excluded from our SEC reserve report. Our Louisiana properties are situated in Caddo Parish and in DeSoto Parish. At June 30, 2010, the Louisiana properties contained all of our proved reserves, a situation that is expected to continue. The Texas properties consist primarily of wells acquired by the Company in several transactions between 1991 and 2002 and through overriding royalty interests reserved in farm-out agreements in 1998 and 1999. The vast majority of the Louisiana properties were acquired on or about October 1, 2004, January 11, 2005 and February 6, 2006.

 

Our net production for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2010 for all of the Company’s wells averaged approximately 2,171 Mcf of natural gas per day, 4 barrels of oil per day and 105 gallons of natural gas liquids per day as compared to approximately 766 Mcf of natural gas per day, 5 barrels of oil per day and 213 gallons of natural gas liquids per day in the fiscal year ended June 30, 2009.

 

RECENT DEVELOPMENTS

 

Indigo Minerals, LLC (“Indigo Minerals”) has plans to re-work or re-enter certain wells in the Cotton Valley formation in which the Company has such interests. Indigo Minerals now operates the Cotton Valley wells previously operated by Chesapeake in which the Company has an interest.

 

Chesapeake has drilled and completed eleven horizontal Haynesville Shale wells on our acreage, the Western 18-H1, Saddler 9-H1, the Mitchell 12-H1 and the Woolworth 15-H1 in Sections 18, 9, 12 and 15-T15N-R16W, respectively; the Soaring Ridge 15H-1, the Clingman 12-H1, the Clingman 11-H1, Clingman 2-H1, Slaughter 6-H1 and the Muslow 5-H1 in Sections 15, 12, 11, 2, 6 and 5-T15N-R15W, respectively; and the SRLT 33-H1 in Section 33-T16N-R15W.

 

Goodrich has drilled and completed the following horizontal Haynesville Shale wells: the Garland 25 in Section 25-T14N-R16W; the Plants 26 in Section 26-T14N-R16W; and the Garland 24 in Section 24-T14N-R16W. Within the first 90 days of production, both the Garland 25 and the Plants 26 horizontal wells have produced over one Bcf of natural gas.

 

EXCO has completed two wells, the Red Oak Timber 6 H-1 in Section 6-T14N-R15W in the Bethany Longstreet field and the Thomas 36 H-1 in Section 36-T16N-R15W in the Johnson Branch field. Recently EXCO spud two new wells, the Crow 8 H-1 in Section 8-T14N-R15W and the Red Oak Timber 7 H-1 in Section 7-T14N-R15W; both are located in the Bethany Longstreet field.

 

5



Table of Contents

 

GAS GATHERING

 

Cubic has developed its infrastructure in Johnson Branch with approximately 16 miles of gathering lines and pipeline constructed for its currently producing wells and any further completions. In addition, a Johnson Branch tap, common point and compression facility were completed in November 2007 and are currently operational. The Company has also developed its infrastructure with approximately 7.8 miles of gathering lines and owns three taps in its Bethany Longstreet acreage.

 

MARKETING OF PRODUCTION

 

Crude Oil and Natural Gas

 

Our production consists mainly of natural gas. During fiscal 2010, we marketed our production of natural gas that was produced from wells by our affiliate Fossil Operating (“Fossil”), an entity controlled by our President and Chief Executive Officer, Calvin A. Wallen III, to three purchasers (i) in Texas, Enbridge G & P, LP, and (ii) in Louisiana, EROC Gathering Company, LP and NGTS, LP. We sell our affiliate-operated crude oil and condensate (“NGL”) production at or near the well-site; although in some cases it is gathered by us or others and delivered to a central point of sale. Our crude oil and condensate production is transported by truck or by pipeline and is marketed by Indigo Minerals LLC (“Indigo”), Transoil Marketing, Inc. (“Transoil”), Eastex Crude Company (“Eastex”), and Martin Gas Sales (“Martin”). During fiscal 2010, all of our production was generated by Fossil and four third-party operators: Chesapeake, Indigo, EXCO and Goodrich. Pursuant to the terms of our operating agreements, these third-party operators have the right to market our production from wells operating by them.  Of these third-party producers, our total revenues are generated as follows: Goodrich - 41%, Chesapeake - 23%, and EXCO - 11%.  Purchases by NGTS through Fossil Operating total 11% of our total revenues. We do not have any gas marketing agreements, commitments or contracts; we sell our crude oil, NGL and natural gas at the prevailing market prices. We have not engaged in crude oil hedging or trading activities. The majority of our production and our revenue is now generated by wells drilled and operated by non-affiliated third-party operators.

 

We believe we would be able to locate alternate purchasers in the event of the loss of any of these purchasers, and that any such loss would not have a material adverse effect on our financial condition or results of operations. Revenue from the sale of natural gas totaled $3,337,543 for fiscal 2010 and represented 96% of our total oil and gas revenues for that fiscal year.

 

Price Considerations

 

Natural gas and natural gas liquids prices in the geographical areas in which we operate are closely tied to established price indices which are heavily influenced by national and regional supply and demand factors and the futures price per MMbtu for natural gas delivered at Henry Hub, Louisiana established on the NYMEX (“NYMEX-Henry Hub”). At times, these indices correlate closely with the NYMEX-Henry Hub price, but often there are significant variances between the NYMEX-Henry Hub price and the indices used to price our natural gas. Average natural gas prices received by us in each of our operating areas generally fluctuate with changes in these established indices. The average natural gas price per Mcf received by us in fiscal 2010 was $4.21 as compared to $5.98 in fiscal 2009. The average natural gas liquids price per gallon received by us in fiscal 2010 was $1.27 compared to $1.12 in fiscal 2009. Crude oil prices are established in a highly liquid, international market, with average crude oil prices that we receive generally fluctuating with changes in the futures price established on the NYMEX for West Texas Intermediate Crude Oil (“NYMEX-WTI”). The average crude oil price per barrel received by us in fiscal 2010 was $73.18 as compared to $60.00 in fiscal 2009.

 

6



Table of Contents

 

OIL AND GAS RESERVES

 

The following tables set forth the proved developed and proved undeveloped reserves at June 30, 2010, the estimated future net cash flows from such proved reserves and the Standardized Measure of Discounted Future Net Cash Flows attributable to our reserves at June 30, 2010, 2009 and 2008:

 

7



Table of Contents

 

 

 

Oil & Natural

 

 

 

Total Gas

 

Estimated

 

 

 

 

 

Gas Liquids

 

Gas

 

Equivalent

 

Future Net

 

10%

 

Category

 

(Bbls)

 

(Mcf)

 

(Mcfe)

 

Cash Flows

 

Discount

 

Proved Producing

 

624

 

1,352,220

 

1,355,962

 

$

4,096,600

 

$

3,407,410

 

Proved Non-Producing

 

542

 

1,314,390

 

1,317,642

 

5,535,670

 

4,517,210

 

Proved Developed Reserves

 

1,166

 

2,666,610

 

2,673,604

 

$

9,632,270

 

$

7,924,620

 

Proved Undeveloped

 

7,481

 

26,490,670

 

26,535,556

 

81,104,850

 

$

56,832,670

 

Total Proved Reserves

 

8,647

 

29,157,280

 

29,209,160

 

$

90,737,120

 

$

64,757,290

 

 

 

 

At June 30,

 

 

 

2010

 

2009

 

2008

 

Proved Developed Reserves:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Oil & Natural Gas Liquids (Bbls)

 

1,166

 

2,968

 

23,645

 

Gas (Mcf)

 

2,666,610

 

337,993

 

1,019,276

 

Mcfe

 

2,673,604

 

355,801

 

1,161,146

 

Estimated future net cash flows (before income tax)

 

$

9,632,270

 

$

956,021

 

$

9,410,338

 

Standardized Measure (1)

 

$

7,924,620

 

$

781,820

 

$

7,911,561

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Proved Undeveloped Reserves:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Oil & Natural Gas Liquids (Bbls)

 

7,481

 

123,241

 

65,303

 

Gas (Mcf)

 

26,490,670

 

19,981,634

 

5,070,453

 

Mcfe

 

26,535,556

 

20,721,079

 

5,462,271

 

Estimated future net cash flows (before income tax)

 

$

81,104,850

 

$

25,860,200

 

$

37,656,434

 

Standardized Measure (1)

 

$

56,832,670

 

$

10,020,570

 

$

25,199,095

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total Proved Reserves:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Oil & Natural Gas Liquids (Bbls)

 

8,647

 

126,209

 

88,948

 

Gas (Mcf)

 

29,157,280

 

20,319,627

 

6,089,729

 

Mcfe

 

29,209,160

 

21,076,880

 

6,623,417

 

Estimated future net cash flows (before income tax)

 

$

90,737,120

 

$

26,816,221

 

$

47,066,772

 

Standardized Measure (1)

 

$

64,757,290

 

$

10,802,390

 

$

33,110,656

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Average price used to calculate reserves:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Oil (per Bbl)

 

$

70.08

 

$

66.52

 

$

138.80

 

Natural Gas Liquids (per Bbl)

 

$

1.25

 

$

1.02

 

$

93.86

 

Gas (per Mcf)

 

$

5.08

 

$

3.72

 

$

14.10

 

 


(1)    The Standardized Measure of Discounted Future Net Cash Flows prepared by the Company represents the present value (using an annual discount rate of 10%) of estimated future net cash flows from the production of proved reserves, after giving effect to income taxes. See “Note J - Oil and gas reserves information (unaudited)” in the Notes to the Financial Statements of the Company included elsewhere in this Report for additional information regarding the disclosure of the Standardized Measure information in accordance with the provisions of Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 932. Extractive Activities — Oil and Gas.

 

During fiscal 2010, we incurred total expenditures of $4.2 million relating to development and exploration activities that resulted in 2,328,617 Mcfs of proved undeveloped reserves being converted to proved developed. We have not held any of our proved undeveloped reserves for longer than five years. All reserve information is located in the Haynesville Shale and Cotton Valley plays in Louisiana.

 

8



Table of Contents

 

The information set forth in this Annual Report relating to our proved reserves, estimated future net cash flows and present values is taken from reports prepared by Cambrian Consultants America, Inc., d/b/a RPS (“RPS”), an independent petroleum engineering firm, for fiscal years 2010, 2009 and 2008. The reservoir engineer at RPS who oversaw the preparation of the reserve estimates has a Master’s of Science in Geology and is certified by the State of Texas Professional Geologists as a Licensed Geologist and has thirty-two years of experience in the upstream oil and gas industry. The estimates of this independent petroleum engineering firm were based upon review of production histories and other geological, economic, ownership and engineering data provided by the Company. Information with respect to our reserves in Texas as of June 30, 2010, was prepared in-house was not reviewed by an independent engineering firm, due to the immaterial size was not reported in Cubic’s reserve report for the period ended June 30, 2010. Cubic’s internal geologist reviews all data that is provided to RPS for the reserve reports. He has a Master’s of Science in Geology and is an American Association of Petroleum Geologists, Certified Petroleum Geologists and has twenty-eight years of experience in the upstream oil and gas industry.  He also reviews and approves the reports from RPS. In accordance with guidelines of the SEC, our estimates of proved reserves and the future net revenues from which present values are derived are made using an average price mechanism based on the first day of each of the last twelve months and a differential based on amount received per Mcf, by the Company. Operating costs, development costs and certain production-related taxes were deducted in arriving at estimated future net cash flows, but such costs do not include debt service or general and administrative expenses.

 

There are numerous uncertainties inherent in estimating oil and gas reserves and their values, including many factors beyond our control. The reserve data set forth in this Annual Report represents estimates only. Reservoir engineering is a subjective process of estimating the sizes of underground accumulations of oil and gas that cannot be measured in an exact manner. The accuracy of any reserve estimate is a function of the quality of available data, engineering and geological interpretation, and judgment. As a result, estimates of different engineers, including those used by us, may vary. In addition, estimates of reserves are subject to revision based upon actual production, results of future development, exploitation and exploration activities, prevailing oil and gas prices, operating costs and other factors, which revisions may be material. Accordingly, reserve estimates are often different from the quantities of oil and gas that are ultimately recovered and are highly dependent upon the accuracy of the assumptions upon which they are based. There can be no assurance that these estimates are accurate predictions of our oil and gas reserves or their values. Estimates with respect to proved reserves that may be developed and produced in the future are often based upon volumetric calculations and upon analogy to similar types of reserves rather than actual production history. Estimates based on these methods are generally less reliable than those based on actual production history. Subsequent evaluation of the same reserves based upon production history will result in variations, which may be substantial, in the estimated reserves.

 

The estimates of proved reserves at June 30, 2010, 2009, and 2008 were prepared by our independent petroleum consultant, RPS, in accordance with generally accepted petroleum engineering and evaluation principles and definitions and guidelines established by the SEC. The technical persons responsible for preparing the reserve estimates presented herein meet the requirements regarding qualifications, independence, objectivity and confidentiality set forth in the Standards Pertaining to the Estimating and Auditing of Oil and Gas Reserves Information promulgated by the Society of Petroleum Engineers.

 

Our policies and practices regarding internal control over the estimating of reserves are structured to objectively and accurately estimate our oil and natural gas reserves quantities and present values in compliance with the SEC’s regulations and U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles. We maintain an internal staff of petroleum engineers and geosciences professionals who work closely with our independent petroleum consultant to ensure the integrity, accuracy and timeliness of data furnished to RPS in its reserves estimation process. Inputs to our reserves estimation process are based on historical results for production history, oil and natural gas prices, lease operating expenses, development costs, ownership interest and other required data. Our technical team meets regularly with representatives of RPS to review properties and discuss methods and assumptions used in RPS’s preparation of the year-end reserves estimates. While we

 

9



Table of Contents

 

have no formal committee specifically designated to review reserves reporting and the reserves estimation process, our senior management reviews and approves the RPS reserve report and any internally estimated significant changes to our proved reserves on a timely basis.

 

Costs Incurred

 

The following table shows certain information regarding the costs incurred by us in our property acquisition, development and exploratory activities during the periods indicated.

 

 

 

Year Ended June 30,

 

 

 

2010

 

2009

 

2008

 

Property acquisition costs

 

$

1,777,848

 

$

72,385

 

$

394,675

 

Exploratory costs

 

 

5,928,825

 

14,030,615

 

Development costs

 

6,988,115

 

 

916,613

 

Total

 

$

8,765,963

 

$

6,001,210

 

$

15,341,903

 

 

Drilling Results

 

We drilled or participated in the drilling of wells as set out in the table below for the periods indicated. The table was completed based upon the date drilling completed. We did not acquire any wells during these periods. You should not consider the results of prior drilling activities as necessarily indicative of future performance, nor should you assume that there is necessarily any correlation between the number of productive wells drilled and the oil and natural gas reserves generated by those wells.

 

 

 

Year Ended June 30,

 

 

 

2010

 

2009

 

2008

 

 

 

Gross

 

Net

 

Gross

 

Net

 

Gross

 

Net

 

Development wells:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Productive

 

10

 

1.07

 

 

 

 

 

Dry

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total development

 

10

 

1.07

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Exploratory wells:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Productive

 

 

 

6

 

0.82

 

12

 

5.88

 

Dry

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total exploratory

 

 

 

6

 

0.82

 

12

 

5.88

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total wells:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Productive

 

10

 

1.07

 

6

 

0.82

 

12

 

5.88

 

Dry

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total wells

 

10

 

1.07

 

6

 

0.82

 

12

 

5.88

 

 

10



Table of Contents

 

NET PRODUCTION, SALES PRICES AND COSTS

 

The following table presents certain information with respect to production, prices and costs attributable to all oil and gas property interests owned by us for the fiscal years ended June 30, 2010, 2009 and 2008:

 

 

 

Year Ended June 30,

 

 

 

2010

 

2009

 

2008

 

Production Volumes:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Oil (Bbl)

 

1,364

 

1,681

 

1,682

 

Natural gas liquids (gallons)

 

38,411

 

77,772

 

44,476

 

Natural gas (Mcf)

 

792,433

 

279,516

 

228,219

 

Total oil, natural gas liquids, and natural gas (Mcfe)

 

806,102

 

300,712

 

244,665

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Weighted Average Sales Prices:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Oil (per Bbl)

 

$

73.18

 

$

60.00

 

$

102.17

 

Natural gas liquids (per gallon)

 

$

1.27

 

$

1.12

 

$

1.66

 

Natural gas (per Mcf)

 

$

4.21

 

$

5.98

 

$

9.01

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Selected Expenses per Mcfe:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Production costs

 

$

1.27

 

$

3.98

 

$

3.60

 

Workover expenses (non-recurring)

 

$

0.05

 

$

0.12

 

$

0.11

 

Severance taxes

 

$

0.15

 

$

0.20

 

$

0.29

 

Other revenue deductions

 

$

0.65

 

$

0.27

 

$

0.75

 

Total lease operating expenses

 

$

2.13

 

$

4.57

 

$

4.75

 

General and administrative expenses

 

$

2.95

 

$

6.45

 

$

10.17

 

Depreciation, depletion and amortization

 

$

1.43

 

$

2.55

 

$

8.79

 

 

PRODUCTIVE WELLS AND ACREAGE

 

Productive Wells

 

The following table sets forth our productive wells at June 30, 2010:

 

Oil

 

Gas

 

Total

 

Gross

 

Net

 

Gross

 

Net

 

Gross

 

Net

 

 

 

40

 

11.81

 

40

 

11.81

 

 

Acreage

 

The following table sets forth our undeveloped and developed gross and net leasehold acreage at June 30, 2010. Undeveloped acreage includes leased acres on which wells have not been drilled or completed to a point that would permit the production of commercial quantities of oil and gas, regardless of whether or not such acreage contains proved reserves.

 

Undeveloped

 

Developed

 

TOTAL

 

Gross

 

Net

 

Gross

 

Net

 

Gross

 

Net

 

373

 

183

 

13,221

 

5,141

 

13,594

 

5,324

 

 

As is customary in the industry, we generally acquire oil and gas acreage without any warranty of title except as to claims made by, through or under the transferor. Although we have title to developed acreage examined prior to acquisition in those cases in which the economic significance of the acreage justifies the cost, there can be no assurance that losses will not result from title defects or from defects in the assignment of leasehold rights.

 

11



Table of Contents

 

OPERATIONS

 

Oil and gas properties are customarily operated under the terms of a joint operating agreement, which provides for reimbursement of the operator’s direct expenses and monthly per well supervision fees. Per well supervision fees vary widely depending on the geographic location and producing formation of the well, whether the well produces oil or gas and other factors. The majority of our production is operated by non-affiliated third-party operators. The balance of our production is operated by Fossil Operating, Inc. (“Fossil”), an entity wholly owned by Mr. Wallen.

 

We have contract relationships with petroleum engineers, geologists and other operations and production specialists who believe the production rates and reserves will increase, and lower the cost of operating our affiliated and non-affiliated third-party oil and gas properties.

 

EMPLOYEES

 

At September 8, 2010, the Company had eleven (11) employees, four (4) full-time and seven (7) part-time. We regularly use independent consultants and contractors to perform various professional services, including well-site supervision, design, construction, permitting and environmental assessment. We use independent contractors to perform field and on-site production operation services.

 

FACILITIES

 

The Company’s principal executive and administrative offices are located at 9870 Plano Road, Dallas, Texas. The offices are leased on a month-to-month basis from an affiliate controlled by Mr. Wallen and the offices are owned by this affiliate. The average monthly amount charged to the Company during the year ended June 30, 2010, was $2,229. The Company believes that there is other appropriate space available in the event the Company should terminate its current leasing arrangement.

 

COMPETITION

 

Currently our acreage is being operated by affiliated and non-affiliated third-party operators. There is very little competition in this non-operated position, but our focus is on reducing costs and expenses where possible. We have in the past operated and developed oil and natural gas plays and possibly will again in the future. In that environment, we compete with major integrated oil and natural gas companies and independent oil and natural gas companies in all areas of operation. In particular, we compete for property acquisitions and for the equipment and labor required to operate and develop these properties. Most of our competitors have substantially greater financial and other resources than we have. In addition, larger competitors may be able to absorb the burden of any changes in federal, state and local laws and regulations more easily than we can, which could adversely affect our competitive position. These competitors may be able to pay more for exploratory prospects and may be able to define, evaluate, bid for and purchase a greater number of properties and prospects than we can. Further, our competitors may have technological advantages and may be able to implement new technologies more rapidly than we can. Our ability to explore for natural gas and oil prospects and to acquire additional properties in the future will depend on our ability to conduct operations, to evaluate and select suitable properties and to consummate transactions in this highly competitive environment. In addition, most of our competitors have operated for a much longer time than we have and have demonstrated the ability to operate through industry cycles.

 

Recent increased oil and natural gas drilling activity in East Texas and Northwest Louisiana has resulted in increased demand for drilling rigs and other oilfield equipment and services. At various times, we have and may continue to experienced temporary or prolonged shortages or unavailability of drilling rigs, drill pipe

 

12



Table of Contents

 

and other material used in oil and gas drilling and completing. Such unavailability could result in increased costs, delays in timing of anticipated development or cause interests in undeveloped oil and natural gas leases to lapse.

 

Regulation

 

Exploration and Production. The exploration, production and sale of oil and natural gas are subject to various types of local, state and federal laws and regulations. These laws and regulations govern a wide range of matters, including the drilling and spacing of wells, allowable rates of production, restoration of surface areas, plugging and abandonment of wells and requirements for the operation of wells. Our operations are also subject to various conservation requirements. These include the regulation of the size and shape of drilling and spacing units or proration units and the density of wells which may be drilled and the unitization or pooling of oil and natural gas properties. In this regard, some states allow forced pooling or integration of tracts to facilitate exploration, while other states rely on voluntary pooling of lands and leases. In addition, state conservation laws establish maximum rates of production from oil and natural gas wells, generally prohibit the venting or flaring of natural gas and impose certain requirements regarding the ratability of production. All of these regulations may adversely affect the rate at which wells produce oil and natural gas and the number of wells we may drill. All statements in this report about the number of locations or wells reflect current laws and regulations.

 

Laws and regulations relating to our business frequently change, and future laws and regulations, including changes to existing laws and regulations, could adversely affect our business.

 

Environmental Matters. The discharge of oil, gas or other pollutants into the air, soil or water may give rise to liabilities to the government and third parties and may require us to incur costs to remedy or control such discharges. Natural gas, oil or other pollutants, including salt water brine, may be discharged in many ways, including from a well or drilling equipment at a drill site, leakage from pipelines or other gathering and transportation facilities, leakage from storage tanks and sudden discharges from damage or explosion at natural gas facilities or oil and natural gas wells. Discharged hydrocarbons may migrate through soil to water supplies or adjoining property, giving rise to additional liabilities.

 

A variety of federal and state laws and regulations govern the environmental aspects of natural gas and oil production, transportation and processing and may, in addition to other laws, impose liability in the event of discharges, whether or not accidental, failure to notify the proper authorities of a discharge, and other noncompliance with those laws. Compliance with such laws and regulations may increase the cost of oil and natural gas exploration, development and production; although we do not anticipate that compliance will have a material adverse effect on our capital expenditures or earnings. Failure to comply with the requirements of the applicable laws and regulations could subject us to substantial civil and/or criminal penalties and to the temporary or permanent curtailment or cessation of all or a portion of our operations.

 

The Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (“CERCLA”), also known as the “superfund law,” imposes liability, regardless of fault or the legality of the original conduct, on some classes of persons that are considered to have contributed to the release of a “hazardous substance” into the environment. These persons include the owner or operator of a disposal site or sites where the release occurred and companies that dispose or arrange for disposal of the hazardous substances found at the time. Persons who are or were responsible for releases of hazardous substances under CERCLA may be subject to joint and severable liability for the costs of cleaning up the hazardous substances that have been released into the environment and for damages to natural resources, and it is not uncommon for neighboring landowners and other third parties to file claims for personal injury and property damage allegedly caused by the hazardous substances released into the environment. We could be subject to liability under CERCLA because our drilling and production activities generate relatively small amounts of liquid and solid waste, which could be subject to classification as hazardous substances under CERCLA.

 

13



Table of Contents

 

The Resource Conservation and Recovery Act of 1976, as amended (“RCRA”), is the principal federal statute governing the treatment, storage and disposal of hazardous wastes. RCRA imposes stringent operating requirements, and liability for failure to meet such requirements, on a person who is either a “generator” or “transporter” of hazardous waste or an “owner” or “operator” of a hazardous waste treatment, storage or disposal facility. At various times in the past, proposals have been made to amend RCRA to rescind the exemption that excludes oil and natural gas exploration and production wastes from regulation as hazardous waste. Repeal or modification of the exemption by administrative, legislative or judicial process, or modification of similar exemptions in applicable state statutes, would increase the volume of hazardous waste we are required to manage and dispose of and would cause us to incur increased operating expenses.

 

There is an increased focus by local, state and national regulatory bodies on greenhouse gas (“GHG”) emissions and climate change. Various regulatory bodies have announced their intent to regulate GHG emissions, including the United States Environmental Protection Agency, which promulgated several GHG regulations in 2010 and late 2009. As these regulations are under development or are being challenged in the courts, we are unable to predict the total impact of these potential regulations upon our business, and it is possible that we could face increases in operating costs in order to comply with GHG emission legislation.

 

There are numerous state laws and regulations in the states in which we operate which relate to the environmental aspects of our business. These state laws and regulations generally relate to requirements to remediate spills of deleterious substances associated with oil and natural gas activities, the conduct of salt water disposal operations, and the methods of plugging and abandoning of oil and natural gas wells which have been unproductive. Numerous state laws and regulations also relate to air and water quality.

 

We do not believe that our environmental risks will be materially different from those of comparable companies in the oil and natural gas industry. We believe our present activities substantially comply, in all material respects, with existing environmental laws and regulations. Nevertheless, we cannot assure you that environmental laws will not result in a curtailment of production or material increase in the cost of production, development or exploration or otherwise adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations. Although we maintain liability insurance coverage for liabilities from pollution, environmental risks generally are not fully insurable.

 

In addition, because we have acquired and may acquire interests in properties that have been operated in the past by others, we may be liable for environmental damage, including historical contamination, caused by such former operators. Additional liabilities could also arise from continuing violations or contamination not discovered during our assessment of the acquired properties.

 

Marketing and Transportation. Our sales of natural gas are affected by the availability, terms and cost of transportation. The price and terms for access to pipeline transportation are subject to extensive federal and state regulation. From 1985 to the present, several major regulatory changes have been implemented by Congress and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (“FERC”) that affect the economics of natural gas production, transportation and sales. In addition, FERC is continually proposing and implementing new rules affecting segments of the natural gas industry, most notably interstate natural gas transmission companies that remain subject to FERC’s jurisdiction. These initiatives may also affect the intrastate transportation of gas under certain circumstances.

 

The ultimate impact of the complex rules and regulations issued by FERC since 1985 cannot be predicted. We cannot predict what further action FERC will take on these matters. We do not believe that we will be affected by any action taken materially differently than other natural gas producers, gatherers and marketers with which we compete.

 

Additional proposals and proceedings that might affect the natural gas industry are frequently made before Congress, FERC and the courts. The natural gas industry historically has been very heavily regulated, and

 

14



Table of Contents

 

there have been indications that future regulatory efforts might become more vigorous, possibly resulting in more stringent regulation.

 

Our sales of crude oil and condensate are currently not regulated and are made at market prices. In a number of instances, however, the ability to transport and sell such products are dependent on pipelines whose rates, terms and conditions of service are subject to FERC jurisdiction under the Interstate Commerce Act. However, we do not believe that these regulations affect us any differently than other crude oil producers.

 

GLOSSARY OF CERTAIN OIL AND GAS TERMS

 

The following are abbreviations and definitions of terms commonly used in the oil and gas industry, many of which are used in this Report.

 

Bbl” means a barrel of 42 U.S. gallons, used herein in reference to oil or other liquid hydrocarbons.

 

“Bcf” means billion cubic feet.

 

“Bcfe” means Bcf of natural gas equivalent; determined using the ratio of one Bbl of oil or condensate to six Mcf of natural gas.

 

Btu” means British thermal unit, which means the quantity of heat required to raise the temperature of one pound of water by one degree Fahrenheit.

 

“Casing” means a type of pipe that is used for encasing a smaller diameter carrier pipe for installation in a well.  Casing is used to send off fluids from the hole or keep a hole from caving in.

 

Completion” means the installation of permanent equipment for the production of oil or gas.

 

“Compressor Station” means a facility in which the pressure of natural gas is raised to facilitate its transmission through pipelines.

 

“Condensate” means hydrocarbons naturally occurring in the gaseous phase in a reservoir that condense to become a liquid at the surface due to the change in pressure and temperature.

 

“Cubic Foot” means the volume of gas that fills one cubic foot of space under standard temperature and pressure conditions.  Standard pressure is 14.73 psi and standard temperature is 60 degrees Fahrenheit.

 

Developed Acreage” means the number of acres that are allocated or assignable to producing wells or wells capable of production.

 

Development Drilling” or “Development Well” means a well drilled within the proved area of an oil or gas reservoir to the depth of a stratigraphic horizon known to be productive.

 

Dry Hole” or “Dry Well” means a well found to be incapable of producing hydrocarbons in sufficient quantities to justify completion as an oil and gas well.

 

“Estimated Future Net Cash Flows” means estimated future gross cash flows to be generated from the production of proved reserves, net of estimated production, future development costs, and future abandonment costs, using prices and costs in effect as of the date of the report or estimate, without giving effect to non-property related expenses such as general and administrative expenses, debt service and future income tax expense or to deprecation, depletion and amortization.

 

15



Table of Contents

 

Exploration” is the act of searching for potential sub-surface reservoirs of gas or oil.  Methods include the use of magnetometers, gravity meters, seismic exploration, surface mapping, and the drilling of exploratory test wells (known as “wildcats”).

 

Exploratory Drilling” or “Exploratory Well” means a well drilled to find and produce oil or gas reserves not classified as proved, to find a new production reservoir in a field previously found to be productive of oil or gas in another reservoir or to extend a known reservoir.

 

“Fracture Stimulation”   means a stimulation treatment routinely performed involving the injection of water, sand and chemicals under pressure to stimulate hydrocarbon production in low-permeability reservoirs.

 

Farm-In” or “Farm-Out” means an agreement pursuant to which the owner of a working interest in an oil and gas lease assigns the working interest or a portion thereof to another party who desires to drill on the leased acreage. Generally, the assignee is required to drill one or more wells in order to earn its interest in the acreage. The assignor usually retains a royalty or reversionary interest in the lease. The interest received by an assignee is a “farm-in” and the assignor issues a “farm-out.”

 

“Finding and Development Costs” means the total costs incurred for exploration and development activities (excluding exploratory drilling in progress and drilling inventories), divided by total proved reserve additions. To the extent any portion of the proved reserve additions consist of proved undeveloped reserves; additional costs would have to be incurred in order for such proved undeveloped reserves to be produced. This measure may differ from the measure used by other oil and natural gas companies.

 

Gas” means natural gas.

 

“Full Cost Pool”     The full cost pool consists of all costs associated with property acquisition, exploration, and development activities for a company using the full cost method of accounting. Additionally, any internal costs that can be directly identified with acquisition, exploration and development activities are included. Any costs related to production, general corporate overhead or similar activities are not included.

 

Gathering System” means a system of pipelines, compressor stations and any other related facilities that gathers natural gas from a supply region and transports it to the major transmission systems.

 

Gross” when used with respect to acres or wells, means the total acres or wells in which we have a working interest.

 

“Held-by-production”     A provision in an oil, gas and mineral lease that perpetuates a company’s right to operate a property or concession as long as the property or concession produces a minimum paying quantity of oil or gas.

 

Horizontal Drilling” means drilling a well that deviates from the vertical and travels horizontally through a prospective reservoir.

 

“Horizontal Wells”     Wells which are drilled at angles greater than 70 degrees from vertical.

 

Hydrocarbons” means an organic chemical compound of hydrogen and carbon.  Hydrocarbons are a large class of liquid, solid or gaseous organic compounds, which are the basis of almost all petroleum products.

 

“Infill drilling” means drilling of a well between known producing wells to better exploit the reservoir.

 

“Initial production rate” means generally, the maximum 24 hour production volume from a well.

 

16



Table of Contents

 

Lease” means a formal agreement between two or more parties where the owner of the land grants another party the right to drill and produce hydrocarbons in exchange for payment.

 

Mcf” means thousand cubic feet.

 

“Mmcf/d” means one million cubic feet of natural gas per day.

 

“Mcfe” means Mcf of natural gas equivalent; determined using the ratio of one Bbl of oil or condensate to six Mcf of natural gas.

 

MMbtu” means one million Btus.

 

“MMcf” means one million cubic feet.

 

“MMcfe” means MMcf of natural gas equivalent, determined using the ratio of one Bbl of oil or condensate to six Mcf of natural gas.

 

“Natural Gas Liquids” means liquid hydrocarbons which have been extracted from natural gas (e.g., ethane, propane, butane and natural gasoline).

 

Net” when used with respect to acres or wells, refers to gross acres or wells multiplied, in each case, by the percentage working interest owned by the Company.

 

Net Production” means production that is owned by the Company less royalties and production due others.

 

“NYMEX” means the New York Mercantile Exchange.

 

“Overriding royalty interest”     means an interest in an oil and/or natural gas property entitling the owner to a share of oil and natural gas production free of costs of production.

 

Operator” means the individual or company responsible for the exploration, development and production of an oil or gas well or lease.

 

“Play” means a portion of the exploration and production cycle following the identification by geologists and geophysicists of areas with potential oil and gas reserves.

 

Pipeline” means all parts of a physical facility through which gas is transported, including pipe, valves and other appendages attached to the pipe, compressor units, metering stations, regulator stations, delivery stations, holders, and fabricated assemblies.

 

Present Value,PV-10” or “Standardized Measure” when used with respect to oil and gas reserves, is the pre-tax present value, discounted at an annual rate of 10%, of the estimated future gross revenues to be generated from the production of proved reserves calculated in accordance with the guidelines of the SEC, net of estimated production and future development costs, using prices and costs as of the date of estimation without future escalation (except to the extent a contract specifically provides otherwise), without giving effect to non-property related expenses such as general and administrative expenses, debt service, future income tax expense and depreciation, depletion and amortization.

 

Productive Wells” or “Producing Wells” consist of producing wells and wells capable of production, including natural gas wells waiting on pipeline connections.

 

17



Table of Contents

 

“Proved Reserves”  means those quantities of oil and gas, which, by analysis of geoscience and engineering data, can be estimated with reasonable certainty to be economically producible, from a given date forward, from known reservoirs, and under existing economic conditions, operating methods, and government regulations, prior to the time at which contracts providing the right to operate expire, unless evidence indicates that renewal is reasonably certain, regardless of whether deterministic or probabilistic methods are used for the estimation. The project to extract the hydrocarbons must have commenced or the operator must be reasonably certain that it will commence the project within a reasonable time.

 

“Recompletion means an operation within an existing well bore to make the well produce oil and/or gas from a different, separately producible zone other than the zone from which the well had been producing.

 

Reserves” means proved reserves.

 

Reservoir” means a porous and permeable underground formation containing a natural accumulation of producible oil and/or gas that is confined by impermeable rock or water barriers and is individual and separate from other reservoirs.

 

Royalty” means an interest in an oil and gas lease that gives the owner of the interest the right to receive a portion of the production from the leased acreage (or of the proceeds of the sale thereof), but generally does not require the owner to pay any portion of the costs of drilling or operating the wells on the leased acreage. Royalties may be either landowner’s royalties, which are reserved by the owner of the leased acreage at the time the lease is granted, or overriding royalties, which are usually reserved by an owner of the leasehold in connection with a transfer to a subsequent owner.

 

“Sandstone” means rock composed mainly of sand-sized particles or fragments of the mineral quartz, which, because these grains are rigid, will withstand tremendous pressures without being compacted.

 

Shale” means a type of rock composed of common clay or mud.  When clay is compacted under great pressure and temperature deep in the earth, water contained in the clay is expelled, and clay turns into shale.

 

2-D Seismic” means an advanced technology method by which a cross-section of the earth’s subsurface is created through the interpretation of reflecting seismic data collected along a single source profile.

 

3-D Seismic” means an advanced technology method by which a three dimensional image of the earth’s subsurface is created through the interpretation of reflection seismic data collected over a surface grid. 3-D seismic surveys allow for a more detailed understanding of the subsurface than do conventional surveys and contribute significantly to field appraisal, development and production.

 

“Undeveloped Acreage” means lease acreage on which wells have not been drilled or completed to a point that would permit the production of commercial quantities of oil and natural gas regardless of whether such acreage contains proved reserves.

 

“Undeveloped Reserves” means reserves of any category that are expected to be recovered from new wells on undrilled acreage, or from existing wells where a relatively major expenditure is required for recompletion.

 

Working Interest” means an interest in an oil and gas lease that gives the owner of the interest the right to drill for and produce oil and gas on the leased acreage and requires the owner to pay a share of the costs of drilling and production operations. The share of production to which a working interest owner is entitled will always be smaller than the share of costs that the working interest owner is required to bear, with the balance of the production accruing to the owners of royalties.

 

“Workovers” means operations on a producing well to restore or increase production.

 

18



Table of Contents

 

AVAILABILITY OF INFORMATION

 

We file annual, quarterly and current reports and proxy statements with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”). The public may read and copy any materials we file with the SEC at the SEC’s Public Reference Room at 100 F Street N.E., Washington, D.C. 20549. The public may obtain information about the operation of the Public Reference Room by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. We file our reports with the SEC electronically. The SEC maintains a website at www.sec.gov that contains reports, proxy and information statements, and other information regarding Cubic Energy, Inc. and other companies that file electronically with the SEC.

 

Our website address is www.cubicenergyinc.com. We make available on our website free of charge copies of our annual report on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K and amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act as soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically file such material with, or furnish it to, the SEC.

 

19



Table of Contents

 

Item 1A. Risk Factors.

 

You should carefully consider the following risk factors, in addition to the other information set forth in this Report, in connection with any investment decision regarding shares of our common stock. Each of these risk factors could adversely affect our business, operating results and financial condition, as well as adversely affect the value of an investment in our common stock. Some information in this Report may contain “forward-looking” statements that discuss future expectations of our financial condition and results of operation. The risk factors noted in this section and other factors could cause our actual results to differ materially from those contained in any forward-looking statements.

 

Fluctuations in oil and natural gas prices, which have been volatile at times, may adversely affect our revenues as well as our ability to maintain or increase our borrowing capacity, repay current or future indebtedness and obtain additional capital.

 

Our future financial condition, access to capital, cash flow and results of operations depend upon the prices we receive for our oil and natural gas. We are particularly dependent on prices for natural gas. Historically, oil and natural gas prices have been volatile and are subject to fluctuations in response to changes in supply and demand, market uncertainty and a variety of additional factors that are beyond our control. Factors that affect the prices we receive for our oil and natural gas include:

 

·                  the level of domestic production;

 

·                  the availability of imported oil and natural gas;

 

·                  political and economic conditions and events in foreign oil and natural gas producing nations, including embargoes, continued hostilities in the Middle East and other sustained military campaigns, and acts of terrorism or sabotage;

 

·                  the ability of members of the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries to agree to and maintain oil price and production controls;

 

·                  the cost and availability of transportation and pipeline systems with adequate capacity;

 

·                  the cost and availability of other competitive fuels;

 

·                  fluctuating and seasonal demand for oil, natural gas and refined products;

 

·                  concerns about global warming or other conservation initiatives and the extent of governmental price controls and regulation of production;

 

·                  weather;

 

·                  foreign and domestic government relations; and

 

·                  overall economic conditions, particularly the recent worldwide economic slowdown which has put downward pressure on oil and natural gas prices and demand.

 

In the past, prices of oil and natural gas have been extremely volatile, and we expect this volatility to continue. During fiscal 2010, the Henry Hub spot price for natural gas fluctuated from a high of $6.00 per Mcf to a low of $3.06 per Mcf, while the NYMEX West Texas Intermediate crude oil price ranged from a high of $84.29 per Bbl to a low of $64.15 per Bbl.

 

Our revenues, cash flow and profitability and our ability to maintain or increase our borrowing capacity, to repay current or future indebtedness and to obtain additional capital depend substantially upon oil and natural gas prices.

 

20



Table of Contents

 

We face significant competition, and many of our competitors have resources in excess of our available resources.

 

The oil and gas industry is highly competitive. We encounter competition from other oil and gas companies in all areas of our operations, including the acquisition of producing properties and exploratory prospects and sale of crude oil, natural gas and natural gas liquids. Our competitors include major integrated oil and gas companies and numerous independent oil and gas companies, individuals and drilling and income programs. Many of our competitors are large, well established companies with substantially larger operating staffs and greater capital resources than us. Such companies may be able to pay more for productive oil and gas properties and exploratory prospects and to define, evaluate, bid for and purchase a greater number of properties and prospects than our financial or human resources permit. Our ability to acquire additional properties and to discover reserves in the future will depend upon our ability to evaluate and select suitable properties and to consummate transactions in this highly competitive environment.

 

Exploratory drilling is a speculative activity that may not result in commercially productive reserves and may require expenditures in excess of budgeted amounts.

 

Drilling activities are subject to many risks, including the risk that no commercially productive oil or gas reservoirs will be encountered. There can be no assurance that new wells drilled by us or in which we have an interest will be productive or that we will recover all or any portion of our investment. Drilling for oil and gas may involve unprofitable efforts, not only from dry wells, but also from wells that are productive but do not produce sufficient net revenues to return a profit after drilling, operating and other costs. The cost of drilling, completing and operating wells is often uncertain. Our drilling operations may be curtailed, delayed or canceled as a result of a variety of factors, many of which are beyond our control, including economic conditions, mechanical problems, pressure or irregularities in formations, title problems, weather conditions, compliance with governmental requirements and shortages in or delays in the delivery of equipment and services. Such equipment shortages and delays sometimes involve drilling rigs where inclement weather prohibits the movement of land rigs causing a high demand for rigs by a large number of companies during a relatively short period of time. Our future drilling activities may not be successful. Lack of drilling success could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

 

Our operations are also subject to all the hazards and risks normally incident to the development, exploitation, production and transportation of, and the exploration for, oil and gas, including unusual or unexpected geologic formations, pressures, down hole fires, mechanical failures, blowouts, explosions, uncontrollable flows of oil, gas or well fluids and pollution and other environmental risks. These hazards could result in substantial losses to us due to injury and loss of life, severe damage to and destruction of property and equipment, pollution and other environmental damage and suspension of operations. We participate in insurance coverage maintained by the operators of our wells, although there can be no assurances that such coverage will be sufficient to prevent a material adverse effect to us if any of the foregoing events occur.

 

We may not identify all risks associated with the acquisition of oil and natural gas properties, and any indemnifications we receive from sellers may be insufficient to protect us from such risks, which may result in unexpected liabilities and costs to us.

 

Generally, it is not feasible for us to review in detail every individual property involved in an acquisition. Our business strategy focuses on acquisitions of oil and natural gas properties capable of production. Any future acquisitions will require an assessment of recoverable reserves, title, future oil and natural gas prices, operating costs, potential environmental hazards, potential tax and other liabilities and other factors. Ordinarily, our review efforts are focused on the higher-valued properties. Even a detailed review of properties and records may not reveal existing or potential problems, nor will it permit us to become sufficiently familiar with the properties to assess fully their deficiencies and capabilities. We do not inspect

 

21



Table of Contents

 

every well that we acquire. Potential problems, such as deficiencies in the mechanical integrity of equipment or environmental conditions that may require significant remedial expenditures, are not necessarily observable even when we inspect a well. Any unidentified problems could result in material liabilities and costs that negatively impact our financial condition and results of operations.

 

Even if we are able to identify problems with an acquisition, the seller may be unwilling or unable to provide effective contractual protection or indemnity against all or part of these problems. Even if a seller agrees to provide indemnity, the indemnity may not be fully enforceable, may be limited by floors and caps on such indemnity, and the financial wherewithal of such seller may constrain the protection provided by such indemnity.

 

We have a history of operating losses and may not be profitable. If we are not able to achieve and maintain profitability in the future, we might not be able to access funds through debt or equity financings.

 

We incurred losses of $(4,936,625) and $(24,762,516) for the fiscal years ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively. Our accumulated deficit as of June 30, 2010 was $(54,390,686). Historically, we have funded our operating losses, acquisitions and drilling costs primarily through a combination of private offerings of convertible debt, senior secured debt, and equity securities.  We have no assurance that we will be able to obtain an increase in our borrowing base to permit us to access any of the remaining $10,000,000 capacity, under our current Wells Fargo Credit Agreement facility.  In the summer of 2012, we must repay or refinance all amounts payable to Wells Fargo under the Credit Agreement. Our success in obtaining the necessary capital resources to fund the repayment to Wells Fargo as well as future costs associated with our operations and drilling plans is dependent upon our ability to: (i) increase revenues through acquisitions and recovery of our proved producing and proved developed non-producing oil and gas reserves; (ii) maintain effective cost controls at the corporate administrative office and in field operations; and (iii) obtain additional financing. However, even if we achieve some success with our plans, there can be no assurance that we will be able to generate sufficient revenues to achieve significant profitable operations or to fund our drilling plans.

 

We have substantial capital requirements necessary for undeveloped properties for which we may not be able to obtain adequate financing.

 

The majority of our oil and gas reserves are undeveloped. At June 30, 2010, we had proved undeveloped reserves of 26,490,670 Mcfe, which represent approximately 91% of our total proved reserves of 29,157,280 Mcfe. Recovery of the Company’s future undeveloped reserves will require significant capital expenditures to further develop these reserves during fiscal 2011 and for the foreseeable future. No assurance can be given that our financing sources will be sufficient to fund our costs for third-party operators’ development activities or that development activities will be either successful or in accordance with our schedule. Additionally, any failure to see increases in natural gas prices or any significant increase in the cost of development could result in a significant reduction in the number of wells drilled and/or reworked. No assurance can be given that any wells will produce oil or gas in commercially profitable quantities.

 

As of June 30, 2010, we had a Drilling Credit balance of $27,219,160 with EXCO to fund the drilling and completion of Company acreage being operated by EXCO.  Once this Drilling Credit is exhausted, the Company will be obligated to pay its share of the drilling and completion costs for wells operated by EXCO on our acreage.  Further, the Company maintains material leaseholds in units operated by Goodrich, Chesapeake, El Paso and Indigo Minerals and it is expected that the Company will be required to expended significant monies in the near term in order to participate in the drilling and completion of wells operated by these other companies.

 

Development of our properties will require additional capital resources. There can be no assurance that sufficient cash on hand or additional financing (on either favorable or unfavorable terms) will be available,

 

22



Table of Contents

 

when required, to fund the development. Any inability to obtain additional financing could have a material adverse effect on us, including requiring us to cease our oil and gas development plans or not being able to maintain our working interest due to failure to pay our share of expenses. Any additional financing may involve substantial dilution to the interests of our shareholders at that time.

 

We are subject to uncertainties in reserve estimates and future net cash flows.

 

This Report contains estimates of our oil and gas reserves and the expected future net cash flows from those reserves, most of which have been prepared by an independent petroleum consultant. There are numerous uncertainties inherent in estimating quantities of reserves of oil and gas and in projecting future rates of production and the timing of development expenditures, including many factors beyond our control. The reserve estimates in this report are based on various assumptions, including, for example, constant oil and gas prices, operating expenses, capital expenditures and the availability of funds, and, therefore, are inherently imprecise indications of future net cash flows. Actual future production, cash flows, taxes, operating expenses, development expenditures and quantities of recoverable oil and gas reserves may vary substantially from those assumed in the estimates. Any significant variance in these assumptions could materially affect the estimated quantity and value of reserves set forth in this report. Additionally, our reserves may be subject to downward or upward revision based upon actual production performance, results of future development and exploration, prevailing oil and gas prices and other factors, many of which are beyond our control.

 

The present value of future net reserves discounted at 10% (the “PV-10”) of proved reserves referred to in this report should not be construed as the current market value of the estimated proved reserves of oil and gas attributable to our properties. In accordance with applicable requirements of the SEC, the estimated discounted future net cash flows from proved reserves are based on an average price of the first day of each month of the last 12 months and a differential of the price per Mcf received by the Company, and costs as of the date of the estimate, whereas actual future prices and costs may be materially higher or lower. Actual future net cash flows also will be affected by: (i) the timing of both production and related expenses; (ii) changes in consumption levels; and (iii) governmental regulations or taxation. In addition, the calculation of the present value of the future net cash flows using a 10% discount as required by the SEC is not necessarily the most appropriate discount factor based on interest rates in effect from time to time and risks associated with our reserves or the oil and gas industry in general. Furthermore, our reserves may be subject to downward or upward revision based upon actual production, results of future development, supply and demand for oil and gas, prevailing oil and gas prices and other factors. See “Item 1. Business — Oil and Gas Reserves.”

 

We are subject to various operating and other casualty risks that could result in liability exposure or the loss of production and revenues.

 

Our oil and gas business involves a variety of operating risks, including, but not limited to, unexpected formations or pressures, uncontrollable flows of oil, gas, brine or well fluids into the environment (including groundwater contamination), blowouts, fires, explosions, pollution and other risks, any of which could result in personal injuries, loss of life, damage to properties and substantial losses. Although we carry insurance at levels that we believe are reasonable, we are not fully insured against all risks. We do not carry business interruption insurance. Losses and liabilities arising from uninsured or under-insured events could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and operations.

 

From time to time, due primarily to contract terms, pipeline interruptions or weather conditions, the producing wells in which we own an interest have been subject to production curtailments. The curtailments range from production being partially restricted to wells being completely shut-in. The duration of curtailments varies from a few days to several months. In most cases, we are provided only limited notice as to when production will be curtailed and the duration of such curtailments. We are not currently experiencing any material curtailment of our production.

 

23



Table of Contents

 

We cannot control the development of the properties we own but do not operate, which may adversely affect our production, revenues and results of operations.

 

As of June 30, 2010, third parties operate wells that represent almost all of our proved reserves. As a result, the success and timing of our drilling and development activities on those properties depend upon a number of factors outside of our control, including:

 

·                  the timing and amount of capital expenditures;

 

·                  the operators’ expertise and financial resources;

 

·                  the approval of other participants in drilling wells; and

 

·                  the selection of suitable technology.

 

If drilling and development activities are not conducted on these properties or are not conducted on a timely basis, we may be unable to increase our production or offset normal production declines, which may adversely affect our production, revenues and results of operations.

 

New SEC and GAAP reserve reporting requirements may affect the results of our reserve estimates and could change our relative positioning in the industry with regard to reserve estimates.

 

On December 31, 2008, the SEC issued Release No. 33-8995, “Modernization of Oil and Gas Reporting” amending and expanding its disclosure requirements for oil and natural gas producing companies. The new rules and disclosure requirements are effective as of December 31, 2009. On January 16, 2010, the Financial Accounting Standards Board adopted rules conforming GAAP to the new SEC definitions and rules. These changes are the first major modifications to the accounting-based reserve reporting requirements since 1982. Among other things, the new SEC rules modify various definitions impacting categories of oil and natural gas reserves and replace the previous pricing mechanism of using the last day of our fiscal year by using an average price mechanism based on the first day of each of the last twelve months for purposes of computing reserve quantities as of December 31, 2009 and subsequent periods. In addition, these new requirements not only require oil and gas companies to report proved reserves, but also permit voluntary disclosure of ‘probable’ and ‘possible’ reserves. While the new rules are intended to provide investors with a more complete picture of the reserves of reporting companies, and were made with an eye towards continuing to recognize new technologies and knowledge about the geology and extent of oil and natural gas fields, these changes will potentially affect the results of our reserve estimates and application of these new reserve reporting rules by competitors may change our relative positioning in the industry as a whole with regards to reserve estimates.

 

Our business may suffer if we lose key personnel.

 

We depend to a large extent on the services of Calvin A. Wallen, III, our President, Chairman of the Board, and Chief Executive Officer. The loss of the services of Mr. Wallen would have a material adverse effect on our operations. We have not obtained key personnel life insurance on Mr. Wallen.

 

Certain of our affiliates control a majority of our outstanding common stock, which may affect other shareholders’ ability to influence matters submitted to a vote of shareholders.

 

As of September 8, 2010, our executive officers, directors and their affiliates and certain 5% shareholders hold approximately 57.6% of our outstanding shares of common stock. As a result, officers, directors and their affiliates and such shareholders have the ability to exert significant influence or control over our business affairs, including the ability to control the election of directors and results of voting on all matters requiring shareholder approval. This concentration of voting power may delay or prevent a potential change in control.

 

24



Table of Contents

 

Certain of our affiliates have engaged in business transactions with the Company, which may result in conflicts of interest.

 

Certain officers, directors and related parties, including entities controlled by Mr. Wallen, the President, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer, have engaged in business transactions with the Company which were not the result of arm’s length negotiations between independent parties. Our management believes that the terms of these transactions were as favorable to us as those that could have been obtained from unaffiliated parties under similar circumstances. All future transactions between us and our affiliates will be on terms no less favorable than could be obtained from unaffiliated third parties and will be approved by a majority of the disinterested members of our Board of Directors.

 

The liquidity, market price and volume of our stock are volatile, and our stock is subject to certain penny stock rules.

 

Our common stock is traded on the NYSE Amex, LLC (the “AMEX”). The liquidity of our common stock may be adversely affected, and purchasers of our common stock may have difficulty selling our common stock, if our common stock does not continue to trade in that or another suitable trading market.

 

As of September 8, 2010, the trading price of our common stock was below $1.00 per share. The trading price of our common stock could be subject to wide fluctuations in response to quarter-to-quarter variations in our operating results, announcements of our drilling results and other events or factors. In addition, the U.S. stock market has from time to time experienced extreme price and volume fluctuations that have affected the market price for many companies and which often have been unrelated to the operating performance of these companies. These broad market fluctuations may adversely affect the market price of our securities.

 

We may experience adverse consequences because of required indemnification of officers and directors.

 

Provisions of our Certificate of Formation and Bylaws provide that we will indemnify any director and officer as to liabilities incurred in their capacity as a director or officer and on those terms and conditions set forth therein to the fullest extent of Texas law. Further, we may purchase and maintain insurance on behalf of any such persons whether or not we would have the power to indemnify such person against the liability insured against. The foregoing could result in substantial expenditures by us and prevent any recovery from our officers, directors, agents and employees for losses incurred by us as a result of their actions.

 

Certain anti-takeover provisions may discourage a change in control.

 

Provisions of Texas law and our Certificate of Formation and Bylaws may have the effect of delaying or preventing a change in control or acquisition of the Company. Our Certificate of Formation and Bylaws include “blank check” preferred stock (the terms of which may be fixed by our Board of Directors without shareholder approval), and certain procedural requirements governing shareholder meetings. These provisions could have the effect of delaying or preventing a change in control of the Company.

 

We do not intend to declare cash dividends on Common Stock in the foreseeable future.

 

Our Board of Directors presently intends to retain all of our earnings for the repayment of debt and the expansion of our business. We therefore do not anticipate the distribution of cash dividends in the foreseeable future. Any future decision of our Board of Directors to pay cash dividends will depend, among other factors, upon our earnings, financial position and cash requirements.

 

25



Table of Contents

 

Our internal controls over financial reporting may not be effective, which could have a significant and adverse effect on our business.

 

Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and the related rules and regulations of the SEC, which we collectively refer to as Section 404, require us to evaluate our internal controls over financial reporting to allow management to report on those internal controls as of the end of each year. Effective internal controls are necessary for us to produce reliable financial reports and are important in our effort to prevent financial fraud. In the course of our Section 404 evaluations, we may identify conditions that may result in significant deficiencies or material weaknesses and we may conclude that enhancements, modifications or changes to our internal controls are necessary or desirable. Implementing any such matters would divert the attention of our management, could involve significant costs, and may negatively impact our results of operations.

 

We note that there are inherent limitations on the effectiveness of internal controls, as they cannot prevent collusion, management override or failure of human judgment. If we fail to maintain an effective system of internal controls or if management or our independent registered public accounting firm were to discover material weaknesses in our internal controls, we may be unable to produce reliable financial reports or prevent fraud, and it could harm our financial condition and results of operations, result in a loss of investor confidence and negatively impact our share price.

 

We may not have satisfactory title or rights to our properties.

 

Our contract land professionals have reviewed title records or other title review materials relating to substantially all of our producing properties. The title investigation performed by us prior to acquiring undeveloped properties is thorough, but less rigorous than that conducted prior to drilling, consistent with industry standards. A title opinion obtained on the drill site prior to drilling does not necessarily ensure satisfactory title. We believe we have satisfactory title to our producing properties in accordance with standards generally accepted in the oil and gas industry. Our properties are subject to customary royalty interests, liens incident to operating agreements, liens for current taxes and other burdens, which we believe do not materially interfere with the use of or affect the value of such properties. At June 30, 2010, our leaseholds for some of our net acreage were being kept in force by virtue of production.  The majority of our acreage is in Northwest Louisiana and the climate in Northwest Louisiana has become increasingly hostile and litigious towards oil and gas companies.  Mineral owners are looking for opportunities to make additional money from their minerals and/or cause leases to expire. In the normal course of our business, title defects and lease issues of varying degrees will arise, and, if practicable, reasonable efforts will be made to cure any such defects and issues.

 

The Company may make acquisitions of oil and gas properties from time to time subject to available resources. In making an acquisition, we generally focus most of our title and valuation efforts on the more significant properties. It is generally not feasible for us to perform an in-depth review of every property we purchase and all records with respect to such properties. However, even an in-depth review of properties and records may not necessarily reveal existing or potential problems, nor will it permit us to become familiar enough with the properties to assess fully their deficiencies and capabilities. To the extent the seller does not operate the properties, obtaining access to properties and records may be more difficult. Even when problems are identified, the seller may not be willing or financially able to give contractual protection against such problems, and we may decide to assume environmental and other liabilities in connection with acquired properties.

 

Governmental regulations could adversely affect our business.

 

Our business is subject to certain federal, state and local laws and regulations on taxation, the exploration for and development, production and marketing of oil and natural gas, and environmental and safety matters. Many laws and regulations require drilling permits and govern the spacing of wells, rates of production, prevention of waste and other matters. These laws and regulations have increased the costs of our operations.

 

26



Table of Contents

 

In addition, these laws and regulations, and any others that are passed by the jurisdictions where we have production, could limit the total number of wells drilled or the allowable production from successful wells, which could limit our revenues.

 

Laws and regulations relating to our business frequently change, and future laws and regulations, including changes to existing laws and regulations, could adversely affect our business.

 

In particular and without limiting the foregoing, various tax proposals currently under consideration could result in an increase and acceleration of the payment of federal income taxes assessed against independent oil and natural gas producers, for example by eliminating the ability to expense intangible drilling costs, removing the percentage depletion allowance and increasing the amortization period for geological and geophysical expenses. Any of these changes would increase our tax burden.

 

The States of Texas and Louisiana and many other states require permits for drilling operations, drilling bonds and reports concerning operations and impose other requirements relating to the exploration for and production of oil and gas. Such states also have statutes or regulations addressing conservation matters, including provisions for the unitization or pooling of oil and gas properties, the establishment of maximum rates of production from wells and the regulation of spacing, plugging and abandonment of such wells. The statutes and regulations of these states limit the rate at which oil and gas can be produced from our properties. However, we do not believe we will be affected materially differently by these statutes and regulations than any other similarly situated oil and gas company.

 

Environmental liabilities could adversely affect our business.

 

In the event of a release of oil, natural gas or other pollutants from our operations into the environment, we could incur liability for any and all consequences of such release, including personal injuries, property damage, cleanup costs and governmental fines. We could potentially discharge these materials into the environment in several ways, including:

 

·                  from a well or drilling equipment at a drill site;

·                  leakage from gathering systems, pipelines, transportation facilities and storage tanks;

·                  damage to oil and natural gas wells resulting from accidents during normal operations; and

·                  blowouts, cratering and explosions.

 

In addition, because we may acquire interests in properties that have been operated in the past by others, we may be liable for environmental damage, including historical contamination, caused by such former operators. Additional liabilities could also arise from continuing violations or contamination that we have not yet discovered relating to the acquired properties or any of our other properties.

 

To the extent we incur any environmental liabilities, it could adversely affect our results of operations or financial condition.

 

Climate change legislation, regulation and litigation could materially adversely affect us.

 

There is an increased focus by local, state and national regulatory bodies on greenhouse gas (“GHG”) emissions and climate change. Various regulatory bodies have announced their intent to regulate GHG emissions, including the United States Environmental Protection Agency, which promulgated several GHG regulations in 2010 and late 2009. As these regulations are under development or are being challenged in the courts, we are unable to predict the total impact of these potential regulations upon our business, and it is possible that we could face increases in operating costs in order to comply with GHG emission legislation.

 

Passage of legislation or regulations that regulate or restrict emissions of GHG, or GHG-related litigation instituted against us or our customers, could result in direct costs to us and could also result in changes to the

 

27



Table of Contents

 

consumption and demand for natural gas and carbon dioxide produced from our oil and natural gas properties, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial position, results of operations and prospects.

 

Horizontal drilling activities could be subject to increased regulation and could expose us to environmental risks that could adversely affect us.

 

Legislation relating to horizontal drilling activities that could impose new permitting disclosure or other environmental restrictions or obligations on our operations is currently being considered at the federal level, and may in the future be considered at the state or local level. In particular, the U.S. Congress recently signaled a renewed interest in certain downhole injection activities, some of which we utilize in our operations. The focus may lead to new legislation or regulations that could affect our operations. Any additional requirements or restrictions on our operations could result in delays, increased operating costs or a requirement to change or eliminate certain drilling and injection activities in a manner that may materially adversely affect us. In addition, because horizontal drilling involves the injection of water, sand and chemicals under pressure into rock formations to stimulate natural gas production, it is also possible that our drilling and injection operations could adversely affect the environment, which could result in a requirement to perform investigations or clean-ups or in the incurrence of other unexpected material costs or liabilities.

 

We may be responsible for additional costs in connection with abandonment of properties.

 

We are responsible for payment of plugging and abandonment costs on our oil and gas properties pro rata to our working interest. Based on our experience, we anticipate that the ultimate aggregate salvage value of lease and well equipment located on our properties will exceed the costs of abandoning such properties. There can be no assurance, however, that we will be successful in avoiding additional expenses in connection with the abandonment of any of our properties. In addition, abandonment costs and their timing may change due to many factors, including actual production results, inflation rates and changes in environmental laws and regulations.

 

28



Table of Contents

 

Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments.

 

None.

 

Item 2. Properties.

 

A description of our properties is included in “Part I. Item 1. Business” and is incorporated herein by reference.

 

Item 3. Legal Proceedings.

 

We are party to lawsuits arising in the normal course of business. We intend to defend these actions vigorously and believe, based on currently available information, that adverse results or judgments from such actions, if any, will not be material to our financial position or results of operations. The majority of our acreage is in Northwest Louisiana and the climate in Northwest Louisiana has become increasingly hostile and litigious towards oil and gas companies. Mineral owners are seeking opportunities to make additional money from their minerals and/or to cause leases to expire. In the normal course of our business, title defects and lease issues of varying degrees will arise, and, if practicable, reasonable efforts will be made to cure any such defects and issues.

 

A lawsuit was filed on or about June 15, 2010, styled, “Gloria’s Ranch, LLC v. Tauren Exploration, Inc., Cubic Energy, Inc., Wells Fargo Energy Capital, Inc. & EXCO USA Asset, LLC”, filed in the 1st Judicial District Court, Caddo Parish, Louisiana, Cause No. 541-768, A.  This lawsuit alleges that all or part of the Gloria’s Ranch mineral lease has lapsed, and seeks a finding that the mineral lease has lapsed, damages, attorney fees, and other equitable relief. This lawsuit would have a material effect, of a maximum of 17%, on the acreage position of the Company if ultimately adjudicated entirely in favor of the mineral owner. The Company intends to vigorously defend its position and believes it will prevail regarding a majority, if not all, of the acreage at issue in this lawsuit.

 

Item 4.  (Removed and Reserved).

 

29



Table of Contents

 

PART II

 

Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters, and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

 

Common Stock and Market

 

The common stock of the Company is traded on the NYSE Amex, LLC (the “AMEX”) under the trading symbol “QBC”. Prior to August 4, 2008, the common stock of the Company was traded on the Over-The-Counter Bulletin Board (the “OTCBB”) under the trading symbol “QBIK”.

 

At September 8, 2010, there were 75,394,579 shares of common stock outstanding held by approximately 802 shareholders of record.

 

Under its Amended and Restated Certificate of Formation, the Company is authorized to issue one class of up to 120,000,000 common shares, par value $0.05 per share, and one class of up to 10,000,000 preferred shares, par value $0.01 per share. As of September 8, 2010, there were 105,904 preferred shares of the Company outstanding.

 

Common Stock Price Range

 

The following table shows, for the periods indicated, the range of high and low bid price information for our common stock as reported by the OTCBB through August 3, 2008, and thereafter the high and low sales price information on the AMEX. Any market for our common stock should be considered sporadic, illiquid and highly volatile. Prices on the OTCBB reflect inter-dealer quotations, without adjustment for retail markup, markdowns or commissions, and may not represent actual transactions. Our common stock’s trading range during the periods indicated is as follows:

 

Fiscal Year 2009

 

High

 

Low

 

1st Quarter

 

$

3.95

 

$

2.10

 

2nd Quarter

 

$

2.10

 

$

1.08

 

3rd Quarter

 

$

2.00

 

$

1.19

 

4th Quarter

 

$

1.82

 

$

1.08

 

 

Fiscal Year 2010

 

High

 

Low

 

1st Quarter

 

$

1.18

 

$

0.94

 

2nd Quarter

 

$

1.70

 

$

0.89

 

3rd Quarter

 

$

1.40

 

$

1.02

 

4th Quarter

 

$

1.15

 

$

0.81

 

 

Changes in Securities, Use of Proceeds and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

 

In connection with the following common stock issuances, the Company entered into Subscription and Registration Rights Agreements (“Subscription Agreements”) with certain investors. Pursuant to the Subscription Agreements, the Company issued an aggregate of 2,104,001 shares of common stock and warrants exercisable into 1,052,000 shares of common stock. On August 18, 2009, four investors acquired 804,000 shares of common stock and warrants exercisable into 402,000 shares of common stock, through the payment of $683,400. On August 26, 2009, six investors acquired 1,300,001 shares of common stock and warrants exercisable into 650,000 shares of common stock, through the payment of $1,105,001. The warrants are exercisable through July 31, 2014, at $0.85 per share. With respect to certain of such issuances, the

 

30



Table of Contents

 

Company paid broker-dealer commissions in the aggregate amount of $59,500 to Avalon Group, Ltd. The aggregate consideration, net of commissions, from such issuances has been used for working capital purposes.

 

The aforementioned issuances were made in reliance upon an exemption from registration set forth in Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1993, as amended, which exempts transactions by an issuer not involving a public offering.

 

We did not purchase any of our equity securities during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2010.

 

Shareholder Return Performance Graph

 

The following graph compares the cumulative total shareholder return on our common stock during the five years ended June 30, 2010 with the cumulative total shareholder return of the Russell 2000 Index and a peer group of 14 oil and gas exploration and production companies comprised of Abraxas Petroleum Corporation, GMX Resources Inc., Petrohawk Energy Corporation, Chesapeake Energy Corporation, Goodrich Petroleum Corporation, Northern Oil & Gas Inc., Comstock Resources Inc., EXCO Resources Inc., Penn Virginia Corporation, Quicksilver Resources Inc., Range Resources Corporation, Southwestern Energy Company, Delta Petroleum Corporation,  and SM Energy Company (collectively referred to as the “Peer Group Index”). The comparison assumes an investment of $100 on June 30, 2005 in each of our common stock, the Russell 2000 Index and the Peer Group Index.

 

 

 

 

6/30/2005

 

6/30/2006

 

6/30/2007

 

6/30/2008

 

6/30/2009

 

6/30/20010

 

Cubic Energy, Inc.

 

$

100.00

 

$

79.21

 

$

131.68

 

$

414.85

 

$

106.93

 

$

89.11

 

Russell 2000 Index

 

$

100.00

 

$

113.29

 

$

130.33

 

$

107.82

 

$

79.46

 

$

94.50

 

Peer Group Index

 

$

100.00

 

$

120.21

 

$

153.64

 

$

284.14

 

$

105.48

 

$

107.85

 

 

31



Table of Contents

 

Dividend Policy

 

We have neither declared nor paid any dividends on our common stock since our inception. Presently, we intend to retain our earnings, if any, to provide funds for expansion of our business. Therefore, we do not anticipate declaring or paying cash dividends on our common stock in the foreseeable future. Any future dividends will be subject to the discretion of our Board of Directors and will depend upon, among other things, future earnings, our operating and financial condition, our capital requirements, debt obligation agreements, general business conditions and other pertinent facts. Moreover, the terms of the Credit Facility prohibit the payment of dividends.

 

Securities Authorized for Issuance under Equity Compensation Plans

 

The following table provides information as of June 30, 2010 with respect to compensation plans (including individual compensation arrangements) under which equity securities of the registrant are authorized for issuance:

 

 

 

Number of

 

Weighted

 

 

 

 

 

securities to be

 

average

 

Number of shares

 

 

 

issued upon

 

exercise price

 

of common stock

 

 

 

exercise of

 

of outstanding

 

remaining available

 

 

 

outstanding

 

options,

 

for future issuance

 

 

 

options, warrants

 

warrants and

 

under equity

 

 

 

and rights

 

rights

 

compensation plans

 

2005 Stock Option Plan approved by shareholders

 

 

$

 

2,736,486

 

Equity compensation plans not approved by shareholders

 

 

$

 

 

Total

 

 

 

 

2,736,486

 

 

32



Table of Contents

 

Item 6. Selected Financial Data.

 

The following table presents a summary of our financial information for the periods indicated. It should be read in conjunction with our Financial Statements and related notes (beginning on page F-1 at the end of this report) and other financial information included herein.

 

 

 

Year ended June 30,

 

(In thousands, except per share data)

 

2010

 

2009

 

2008

 

2007

 

2006

 

Statements of Operations Data:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total oil and gas sales revenues

 

$

3,486

 

$

1,858

 

$

2,302

 

$

583

 

$

509

 

Costs and expenses:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Oil and gas production, operating and development costs

 

1,845

 

1,372

 

1,163

 

481

 

338

 

General and administrative expenses

 

2,389

 

1,940

 

2,488

 

1,325

 

1,401

 

Depreciation, depletion and amortization

 

1,153

 

772

 

2,152

 

362

 

179

 

Impairment loss on oil and gas properties

 

 

20,391

 

 

1,791

 

 

Total costs and expenses

 

5,387

 

24,475

 

5,803

 

3,958

 

1,918

 

Operating income (loss)

 

(1,901

)

(22,617

)

(3,501

)

(3,376

)

(1,409

)

Non-operating income (expense):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other income, net

 

5

 

34

 

46

 

38

 

6

 

Interest expense, net

 

(4,714

)

(2,045

)

(1,580

)

(1,279

)

(639

)

Amortization of loan costs

 

(73

)

(135

)

(94

)

(101

)

(67

)

Total non-operating income (expense)

 

(4,783

)

(2,146

)

(1,628

)

(1,342

)

(700

)

Loss on extinguishment of debt, net

 

1,748

 

 

 

(1,083

)

(660

)

Loss from operations before income taxes

 

(4,937

)

(24,763

)

(5,129

)

(5,801

)

(2,769

)

Income tax expense (benefit)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income (loss)

 

$

(4,937

)

$

(24,763

)

$

(5,129

)

$

(5,801

)

$

(2,769

)

Net loss per common share - basic and diluted

 

$

(0.07

)

$

(0.40

)

$

(0.09

)

$

(0.12

)

$

(0.07

)

Weighted average common shares outstanding

 

67,584

 

61,150

 

56,974

 

50,338

 

38,477

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Statements of Cash Flow Data:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash provided by (used in) operating activities

 

$

(682

)

$

(2,152

)

$

(1,234

)

$

(1,802

)

$

(964

)

Cash provided by (used in) investing activities

 

$

(5,736

)

$

(5,589

)

$

(15,513

)

$

(4,052

)

$

(4,800

)

Cash provided by (used in) financing activities

 

$

6,738

 

$

5,668

 

$

15,768

 

$

8,717

 

$

5,765

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balance Sheet Data (at end of period):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Working capital (deficit)

 

$

(1,436

)

$

(27,823

)

$

1,747

 

$

2,607

 

$

(1,357

)

Oil and gas properties, and equipment, net

 

$

8,923

 

$

11,710

 

$

26,858

 

$

13,666

 

$

11,820

 

Total assets

 

$

38,196

 

$

12,127

 

$

29,491

 

$

18,108

 

$

13,373

 

Long-term liabilities, net of discounts

 

$

20,984

 

$

 

$

22,971

 

$

7,627

 

$

5,155

 

Total liabilities

 

$

24,434

 

$

28,150

 

$

23,632

 

$

9,313

 

$

7,320

 

Shareholders’ equity

 

$

13,762

 

$

(16,023

)

$

5,858

 

$

8,795

 

$

6,053

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other Financial Data:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Non-cash stock-based compensation

 

$

396

 

$

385

 

$

1,255

 

$

490

 

$

727

 

 

33



Table of Contents

 

Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

 

The following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with our financial statements and the related notes to those statements included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. In addition to historical financial information, the following discussion and analysis contains forward-looking statements that involve risks, uncertainties and assumptions. Our results and the timing of selected events may differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements as a result of many factors, including those discussed under “risk factors” and elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

 

Overview

 

Cubic Energy, Inc. is an independent upstream energy company engaged in the development and production of, and exploration for, crude oil and natural gas. Our oil and gas assets and activities are concentrated exclusively in Louisiana and Texas.

 

Our corporate strategy with respect to our asset acquisition and development efforts was to position the Company in a low risk opportunity while building main stream high yield reserves.  The acquisition of our Cotton Valley acreage in DeSoto and Caddo Parishes, Louisiana, put us in a reservoir rich environment both in the Cotton Valley and Bossier/Haynesville Shale formations, and gives us the potential to discover additional commercial horizons that can add value to the bottom line. We have had success on our acreage with wells drilled by achieving production from not only the Cotton Valley and Bossier/Haynesville Shale formations, but also the Hosston formations.

 

34



Table of Contents

 

Summary Operating, Reserve and Other Data

 

The following table presents an unaudited summary of certain operating and oil and natural gas reserve data, and non-GAAP financial data for the periods indicated:

 

 

 

Year ended June 30,

 

 

 

2010

 

2009

 

2008

 

2007

 

2006

 

Operating Data:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Proved Reserves (Bcfe)

 

29.2

 

21.1

 

6.6

 

4.3

 

2.9

 

Production (Mcfe)

 

806,102

 

300,712

 

244,665

 

76,214

 

59,798

 

Producing wells at end of period, gross

 

40

 

43

 

32

 

22

 

17

 

Producing wells at end of period, net

 

11.81

 

21.44

 

18.42

 

14.42

 

13.07

 

Acreage, gross

 

13,594

 

14,466

 

14,711

 

17,542

 

16,913

 

Acreage, net

 

5,324

 

6,077

 

6,151

 

7,364

 

7,073

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Production:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Oil (Bbl)

 

1,364

 

1,681

 

1,682

 

967

 

1,047

 

Natural gas (Mcf)

 

792,433

 

279,516

 

228,219

 

70,412

 

53,516

 

Natural gas liquids (gallons)

 

38,411

 

77,772

 

44,476

 

 

 

Total oil, gas and liquids (Mcfe)

 

806,100

 

300,712

 

244,665

 

76,214

 

59,798

 

Average daily (Mcfe)

 

2,208

 

824

 

668

 

209

 

164

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Weighted Average Sales Prices:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Oil (per Bbl)

 

$

70.08

 

$

66.52

 

$

102.15

 

$

61.68

 

$

59.90

 

Natural gas (per Mcf)

 

$

5.08

 

$

3.72

 

$

9.01

 

$

7.44

 

$

8.34

 

Natural gas liquids (per gallon)

 

$

1.25

 

$

1.02

 

$

1.66

 

n/a

 

n/a

 

Natural gas equivalent (per Mcfe)

 

$

4.32

 

$

6.18

 

$

9.41

 

$

7.65

 

$

8.51

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Selected Expenses per Mcfe:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Production costs

 

$

1.27

 

$

3.98

 

$

3.60

 

$

4.18

 

$

5.05

 

Workover expenses (non-recurring)

 

$

0.05

 

$

0.12

 

$

0.11

 

$

1.40

 

$

 

Severance taxes

 

$

0.15

 

$

0.20

 

$

0.29

 

$

0.39

 

$

0.39

 

Other revenue deductions

 

$

0.65

 

$

0.27

 

$

0.75

 

$

0.35

 

$

0.22

 

Total lease operating expenses

 

$

2.13

 

$

4.57

 

$

4.75

 

$

6.32

 

$

5.66

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

General and administrative expenses:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Non-cash stock-based compensation

 

$

0.49

 

$

1.28

 

$

5.13

 

$

6.43

 

$

12.15

 

Other general and administrative

 

$

2.47

 

$

5.17

 

$

5.04

 

$

10.96

 

11.27

 

Total general and administrative

 

$

2.96

 

$

6.45

 

$

10.17

 

$

17.39

 

$

23.42

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Depreciation, depletion and amortization

 

$

1.43

 

$

2.55

 

$

8.79

 

$

4.76

 

$

3.00

 

 

35



Table of Contents

 

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

 

Comparison of Fiscal 2010 to Fiscal 2009

 

Revenues

 

OIL AND GAS SALES increased 88% to $3,486,171 for fiscal 2010 from $1,858,139 for fiscal 2009 primarily due to increased gas volumes resulting from 14 new Haynesville Shale wells, of which nine are operated by Chesapeake Energy Corporation, three are operated by Goodrich Petroleum Corporation and two are operated by EXCO Resources, Inc. This increase was mitigated by the average price of natural gas being $4.32 per Mcf for fiscal 2010 and $6.18 per Mcf for fiscal 2009.

 

Costs and Expenses

 

OIL AND GAS PRODUCTION, OPERATING AND DEVELOPMENT COSTS (also referred to as “LEASE OPERATING EXPENSES” elsewhere herein) increased 34% to $1,845,153 (53% of oil and gas sales) for fiscal 2010 from $1,372,041 (74% of oil and gas sales) for fiscal 2009 primarily due to more wells being on-line in Louisiana, which resulted in: a $439,379 increase in costs passed-through to the Company by the purchaser of the Company’s gas, a $65,000 increase in production taxes and a $53,660 increase in non-operated property expenses. These increases were somewhat offset by a $151,724 decrease in common facility costs and $128,098 decrease in salt water hauling.

 

GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES (“G&A”) increased 23% to $2,389,073 for fiscal 2010 from $1,940,025 in fiscal 2009 as a result of: a $128,965 increase in marketing expense, a $165,597 increase in legal fees due in part to the support needed to address the AMEX non-compliance issue discussed below, related expenses in connection with the November 2009 transaction between the Company, Tauren and Langtry and costs of amending the Wells Fargo Credit Facility. There was also a $63,054 increase in contracted professional services; $20,000 of which went to NYSE Amex non-compliance support and $23,000 went to Sarbanes-Oxley 404 compliance.

 

On June 26, 2009, the Company received a letter from AMEX stating that the Company was not in compliance with Section 1003(a)(iv) of AMEX’s Company Guide because AMEX believed that it appeared questionable, in its opinion, as to whether the Company would be able to continue operations and/or meet its obligations as they mature.  On March 5, 2010, the Company received notice from AMEX that the Company had regained full compliance.  The Company was able to regain full compliance by executing the compliance plan submitted to AMEX that included the measures taken by the Company to acquire the Drilling Credits and restructuring the Company’s debt with Wells Fargo through the Second Amendment.

 

DEPRECIATION, DEPLETION AND AMORTIZATION (“DD&A”) increased 49% to $1,153,065 in fiscal 2010 from $771,861 in fiscal 2009 primarily due to an increase in capital expenditures in fiscal 2010 related to the non-operated development of oil and gas properties.

 

IMPAIRMENT OF OIL AND GAS PROPERTIES decreased to $0 in fiscal 2010 from $20,390,819 in fiscal 2009. The fiscal 2009 impairment resulted from a downward revision of our reserve estimates, which was effected by the following events: (i) we experienced delays related to third party providers in our Bethany Longstreet acreage, including not receiving contracted-for compression services, which temporarily delayed our ability to produce from these wells; (ii) we did not effectuate final completion of certain wells due to a shift in our focus to the development of our Johnson Branch acreage in Caddo Parish, Louisiana; and, (iii) the lack of production history in wells recently brought online lead to a sharper decline curve being utilized by RPS in formulating the reserve estimates.

 

GAIN ON DEBT EXTINGUISHMENT was realized in December 2009 as a result of the refinancing of the debt with Wells Fargo. The existing loan balance of $1,877,494 was decreased (written off) as a term of the

 

36



Table of Contents

 

amendment of the Wells Fargo credit facility that was extinguished, which was partially offset by debt extinguishment costs of $129,871. This created an overall gain on debt extinguishment of $1,747,623 for fiscal 2010.

 

INTEREST EXPENSE, INCLUDING AMORTIZATION OF LOAN DISCOUNT increased 131% to $4,714,386 in fiscal 2010 from $2,044,718 in fiscal 2009 primarily due to an increase in debt (before discounts) to $32,000,000 at June 30, 2010 from $27,000,000 at June 30, 2009. This increase resulted from the drawing down of our revolving credit line of $5,000,000 (before discounts) of our Amended Wells Fargo Credit Facility. The weighted average debt balance (before discounts) for fiscal 2010 was $29,616,438 as compared to $26,565,452 in fiscal 2009. The Credit Facility with Wells Fargo also resulted in a loan discount being recorded. The discount is being amortized over the original three-year term of the debt as additional interest expense with $3,178,416 being recorded in fiscal 2010 as compared to $514,620 in fiscal 2009. There was a decrease in the capitalization of interest expense to the full cost pool for oil and gas properties of $12,737 in fiscal 2010 as compared to $30,682 in fiscal 2009.

 

Comparison of Fiscal 2009 to Fiscal 2008

 

Revenues

 

OIL AND GAS SALES decreased 19% to $1,858,139 for fiscal 2009 from $2,302,310 for fiscal 2008 primarily due to lower gas volumes resulting from a steep production decline-curve and lack of funds to workover existing wells and a 34% decrease in the weighted average sales price for gas (per Mcf). This decline was mitigated by the Company having an average of approximately 22 (gross) wells being on-line in Louisiana in fiscal 2009 versus approximately 13 (gross) wells in fiscal 2008.

 

Costs and Expenses

 

OIL AND GAS PRODUCTION, OPERATING AND DEVELOPMENT COSTS (also referred to as “LEASE OPERATING EXPENSES” elsewhere herein) increased 18% to $1,372,041 (74% of oil and gas sales) for fiscal 2009 from $1,162,489 (50% of oil and gas sales) for fiscal 2008 primarily due to more wells being on-line in Louisiana, which resulted in: a $104,002 increase in common facility expenses, a $101,272 increase in chemical cost and a $64,892 increase in salt water hauling costs. These increases were somewhat offset by a $102,366 decrease in costs passed-through to the Company by the purchaser of the Company’s gas. Such costs are deducted from the Company’s gross revenue by the purchaser.

 

GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES (“G&A”) decreased 22% to $1,940,025 for fiscal 2009 from $2,488,133 in fiscal 2008 as a result of: a $857,099 decrease in non-cash stock compensation expense, due to a 68% decrease in the number of shares of common stock granted versus the prior year period. This decrease was somewhat offset by a $135,536 increase in corporate fees paid, which includes $115,042 in AMEX listing fees and a $4,000 increase due to adding two more outside directors, a $48,563 increase in legal fees due in part to the support needed to address the AMEX non-compliance issue discussed above; and $116,870 in contract services fees related to management’s transition to a new chief financial officer, which occurred in fiscal 2009, but did not occur in the prior year period.

 

DEPRECIATION, DEPLETION AND AMORTIZATION (“DD&A”) decreased 64% to $771,861in fiscal 2009 from $2,152,096 in fiscal 2008 primarily due to a decrease in capital expenditures in fiscal 2009 related to the acquisition and development of oil and gas properties.

 

IMPAIRMENT OF OIL AND GAS PROPERTIES increased to $20,390,819 in fiscal 2009 from $0 in fiscal 2008. The fiscal 2009 impairment resulted from a downward revision of our reserve estimates, which was effected by the following events: (i) we experienced delays related to third party providers in our Bethany Longstreet acreage, including not receiving contracted-for compression services, which temporarily delayed

 

37



Table of Contents

 

our ability to produce from these wells; (ii) we did not effectuate final completion of certain wells due to a shift in our focus to the development of our Johnson Branch acreage in Caddo Parish, Louisiana; and, (iii) the lack of production history in wells recently brought online lead to a sharper decline curve being utilized by RPS Scotia, Inc. in formulating the reserve estimates.

 

INTEREST EXPENSE, INCLUDING AMORTIZATION OF LOAN DISCOUNT increased 29% to $2,044,718 in fiscal 2009 from $1,579,452 in fiscal 2008 primarily due to an increase in debt (before discounts) to $27,000,000 at June 30, 2009 from $23,827,800 at June 30, 2008. This increase resulted from the drawing down of our revolving credit line of $3,172,200 (before discounts). The weighted average debt balance (before discounts) for fiscal 2009 was $26,565,452 as compared to $16,494,613 in fiscal 2008. The Credit Facility with Wells Fargo also resulted in a loan discount being recorded. The discount is being amortized over the original three-year term of the debt as additional interest expense with $514,620 being recorded in fiscal 2009 as compared to $516,030 in fiscal 2008. There was a decrease in the capitalization of interest expense to the full cost pool for oil and gas properties of $30,682 in fiscal 2009 as compared to $330,608 in fiscal 2008.

 

Liquidity and Capital Resources

 

Overview

 

The Company’s primary resource is its oil and gas reserves.

 

On November 24, 2009, the Company entered into transactions with Tauren Exploration, Inc. (“Tauren”) and Langtry Mineral & Development, LLC (“Langtry”), both of which are entities controlled by Calvin Wallen III, the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, under which the Company acquired $30,952,810 in pre-paid drilling credits (the “Drilling Credits”) applicable towards the development of its Haynesville Shale rights in Northwest Louisiana. The Company expects to use the Drilling Credits to fund $30,952,810 of its share of the drilling and completion costs for those horizontal Haynesville Shale wells drilled in sections previously operated by an affiliate of the Company which are now operated by a third party. As of June 30, 2010, $27,219,160 was the remaining balance of the Drilling Credits.

 

Product prices, over which we have no control, have a significant impact on revenues from production and the value of such reserves and thereby on the Company’s borrowing capacity in the event the Company determines to borrow additional funds. Within the confines of product pricing, the Company needs to be able to find and develop or acquire oil and gas reserves in a cost effective manner in order to generate sufficient financial resources through internal means to complete the financing of its capital expenditure program.

 

During the twelve months ended June 30, 2010, the Company used cash flows from operating activities of $681,713 as compared to $2,152,187 in fiscal 2009. Cash flow from operations is dependent on our ability to increase production through our development and exploratory activities and the price received for oil and natural gas.

 

Working Capital and Cash Flow

 

The Company’s working capital increased to ($1,435,908) at June 30, 2010 from ($27,822,536) at June 30, 2009. This increase was primarily due to $27,000,000 of debt scheduled to mature on March and April 2010, becoming a part of current liabilities at June 30, 2009. This debt was subsequently refinanced to a maturity date of July 1, 2012. The current Credit Agreement contains material covenants that include, but are not limited to, a right to Borrowing Base redetermination; it can be redetermined at any time. This redetermination can reduce our revolving credit limit with any excess borrowings being due within 30 days or, at the Company’s option, in five equal monthly installments. The Lender can require liens on newly acquired properties, must grant permission for the sale of properties, the incurrence of other indebtedness or

 

38



Table of Contents

 

the payment of dividends, must approve affiliate transactions, and must approve any hedging or derivative activities. We are in full compliance with the agreement.

 

Operating activities - During the twelve months ended June 30, 2010, the Company used cash flows from operating activities of $681,713 as compared to $2,152,187 in fiscal 2009 and $1,233,829 in fiscal 2008. Cash flow from operations is dependent on our ability to increase production through our development and exploratory activities and the price received for oil and natural gas.

 

Investing activities - During the twelve months ended June 30, 2010, the Company used cash flows from investing activities of $5,735,839 as compared to $5,588,927 in fiscal 2009 and $15,521,537 in fiscal 2008. Cash used in investing activities were for drilling and working interest participation during the three years to develop our assets.

 

Financing activities - During the twelve months ended June 30, 2010, the Company had cash flows from financing activities of $6,738,400 as compared to $5,668,152 in fiscal 2009 and $15,768,095 in fiscal 2008. Cash provided by financing activities for fiscal periods 2010, 2009 and 2008 were from borrowings under the credit facility, borrowings from affiliates and issuances of stock. See the Note C-Stockholder’s equity and Note E- Long-term debt for further discussion.

 

The Company anticipates the following capital expenditures in the remainder of fiscal 2011: completions of up to four wells in its Johnson Branch acreage and up to four wells in its Bethany Longstreet acreage; drilling of these wells by a third party operator will use most of the $27,219,160 Drilling Credits balance remaining and these new non-operated wells could produce enough revenue to continue to permit us to pay our expenses and service current debt as they come due. As a result, our projected capital expenditures are expected to be in a range of approximately $20,000,000 to $30,000,000 for fiscal 2011.

 

Due to the significant downturn in the price of natural gas, continued prudence will be exercised in the undertaking of any new operations during the near term. No assurance can be given that all or any of these anticipated projects will be completed as currently anticipated. While we have re-negotiated with Wells Fargo our revolving note to $40 million, which was subject to a borrowing base limitation of $25 million at June 30, 2010 currently $30 million, and extended the maturity date to July 1, 2012, we believe that we currently have cash on hand to continue to meet our obligations and fund our projected capital expenditures for fiscal 2011.

 

Additionally, because future cash flows and the availability of borrowings are subject to a number of variables, such as prevailing prices of oil and gas, actual production from existing and newly-completed wells, the Company’s success in developing and producing new reserves, and the uncertainty with respect to the amount of funds which may ultimately be required to finance the Company’s development and exploration program, there can be no assurance that the Company’s capital resources will be sufficient to sustain the Company’s development and exploration activities.

 

39



Table of Contents

 

Capital Expenditures

 

The majority of our oil and gas reserves are undeveloped. As such, recovery of the Company’s future undeveloped proved reserves will require significant capital expenditures. Our management estimates that aggregate capital expenditures ranging from a minimum of approximately $20,000,000 (from currently available funds, Drilling Credits and projected cash from operating activities) to a maximum of approximately $30,000,000 will be made to further develop these reserves during fiscal 2011. Moreover, additional capital expenditures may be required for exploratory drilling on our undeveloped acreage. The Company may increase its planned activities for fiscal 2011, if product prices improve. If product prices remain flat or go lower such activities and our capital expenditures, will be restricted.

 

Capital Resources

 

The Company plans to fund its development and exploratory activities through cash on hand (which was approximately $1,750,000 as of the date of this filing), the Drilling Credits, cash provided from operations; and one of, or a combination of, the following potential transactions: a private placement of common stock; a public offering of common stock; a joint venture with an industry partner in which we would or could farm-out a to-be-determined percentage of our working interests in certain properties; a disposition of assets; or other transactions.

 

While we expect production from the wells drilled and completed in fiscal 2008, 2009, 2010 and subsequent to the end of fiscal 2010 to provide cash flow to support additional drilling in fiscal 2011, the Company cannot be certain that adequate funds will be available from cash on hand, operating cash flow, and the aforementioned potential transactions to fully fund the projected capital expenditures for fiscal 2011. Additionally, because future cash flows, the availability of borrowings, and the ability to consummate any of the aforementioned potential transactions are subject to a number of variables, such as prevailing prices of oil and gas, actual production from existing and newly-completed wells, the Company’s success in developing and producing new reserves, the uncertainty of financial markets and joint venture and merger and acquisition activity, and the uncertainty with respect to the amount of funds which may ultimately be required to finance the Company’s development and exploration program, there can be no assurance that the Company’s capital resources will be sufficient to sustain the Company’s development and exploratory activities.

 

Although the Company believes it will be able to obtain funds pursuant to the above-mentioned alternatives, management cannot be assured that such capital resources will be available to the Company. If we are unable to obtain such capital resources on a timely basis, the Company may curtail its planned development and exploratory activities. If a well is proposed by a third-party operator and the Company does not have a drilling credit or the capital resources to participate in that well the Company might not receive any revenue generated by that well while still being required to fulfill the relevant royalty payment obligations to the mineral owner and other royalty holders.

 

Critical Accounting Policies

 

In response to the SEC’s Release No. 33-8040, “Cautionary Advice Regarding Disclosure About Critical Accounting Policies,” we have identified the most critical accounting policies used in the preparation of our consolidated financial statements. We determined the critical policies by considering accounting policies that

 

40



Table of Contents

 

involve our most complex or subjective decisions or assessments. We identified our most critical accounting policies to be those related to our proved reserves, accounts receivables, share-based payments, our choice of accounting method for oil and natural gas properties, goodwill, asset retirement obligations and income taxes.

 

We prepared our consolidated financial statements for inclusion in this report in accordance with GAAP. GAAP represents a comprehensive set of accounting and disclosure rules and requirements, and applying these rules and requirements requires management judgments and estimates including, in certain circumstances, choices between acceptable GAAP alternatives. The following is a discussion of our most critical accounting policies, judgments and uncertainties that are inherent in our application of GAAP.

 

Estimates of Proved Reserves

 

The proved reserves data included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K was prepared in accordance with SEC guidelines. The accuracy of a reserve estimate is a function of:

 

·                  the quality and quantity of available data;

 

·                  the interpretation of that data;

 

·                  the accuracy of various mandated economic assumptions; and

 

·                  the technical qualifications, experience and judgment of the persons preparing the estimates.

 

Because these estimates depend on many assumptions, all of which may substantially differ from actual results, reserve estimates may be different from the quantities of oil and natural gas that are ultimately recovered. In addition, results of drilling, testing and production after the date of an estimate may justify material revisions to the estimate. The assumptions used for our Bossier/Haynesville, Cotton Valley and Hosston well and reservoir characteristics and performance are subject to further refinement as more production history is accumulated.

 

You should not assume that the present value of future net cash flows represents the current market value of our estimated proved reserves. In accordance with SEC requirements, we based the estimated discounted future net cash flows from proved reserves according to the requirements in the SEC’s Release No. 33-8995 Modernization of Oil and Gas Reporting, or Release No. 33-8995. Actual future prices and costs may be materially higher or lower than the prices and costs used in the preparation of the estimate. Further, the mandated discount rate of 10% may not be an accurate assumption of future interest rates.

 

Proved reserves quantities directly and materially impact depletion expense. If the proved reserves decline, then the rate at which we record depletion expense increases, reducing net income. A decline in the estimate of proved reserves may result from lower market prices, making it uneconomical to drill or produce from higher cost fields. In addition, a decline in proved reserves may impact the outcome of our assessment of our oil and natural gas properties and require an impairment of the carrying value of our oil and natural gas properties.

 

Proved reserves are defined as those quantities of oil and gas, which, by analysis of geoscience and engineering data, can be estimated with reasonable certainty to be economically producible from a given date forward, from known reservoirs, and under existing economic conditions, operating methods, and government regulations before the time at which contracts providing the right to operate expire, unless evidence indicates that renewal is reasonably certain, regardless of whether the estimates is a deterministic estimate or probabilistic estimate. The project to extract the hydrocarbons must have commenced, or the operator must be reasonably certain that it will commence the project, within a reasonable time.

 

The area of the reservoir considered as proved includes both the area identified by drilling and limited by fluid contacts, if any, and adjacent undrilled portions of the reservoir that can, with reasonable certainty, be judged to be continuous with it and to contain economically producible oil and gas on the basis of available geoscience and engineering data. In the absence of data on fluid contacts, proved quantities in a reservoir are limited by the lowest known hydrocarbons as seen in a well penetration unless geoscience, engineering, or performance data and reliable technology establish a lower contact with reasonable certainty.

 

41



Table of Contents

 

Where direct observation from well penetrations has defined a highest known oil elevation and the potential exists for an associated gas cap, proved oil reserves may be assigned in the structurally higher portions of the reservoir only if geoscience, engineering, or performance data and reliable technology establish the higher contact with reasonable certainty.

 

Reserves that can be produced economically through application of improved recovery techniques (including, but not limited to, fluid injection) are included in the proved classification when successful testing by a pilot project in an area of the reservoir with properties no more favorable than in the reservoir as a whole, the operation of an installed program in the reservoir or an analogous reservoir, or other evidence using reliable technology establishes the reasonable certainty of the engineering analysis on which the project or program was based, and the project has been approved for development by all necessary parties and entities, including governmental entities.

 

Undrilled locations can be classified as having undeveloped reserves only if a development plan has been adopted indicating that they are scheduled to be drilled within five years, unless the specific circumstances justify a longer time.

 

Existing economic conditions include prices and costs at which economic producibility from a reservoir is to be determined. The price shall be the average price during the 12-month period before the ending date of the period covered by the report, determined as an unweighted arithmetic average of the first-day-of-the-month price for each month within such period, unless prices are defined by contractual arrangements, excluding escalations based upon future conditions.

 

Accounting for oil and natural gas properties

 

The accounting for and disclosure of, oil and natural gas producing activities requires that we choose between two GAAP alternatives; the full cost method or the successful efforts method.

 

We use the full cost method of accounting, which involves capitalizing all acquisition, exploration, exploitation and development costs of oil and natural gas properties. Once we incur costs, they are recorded in the depletable pool of proved properties or in unproved properties, collectively, the full cost pool. Unproved property costs are not subject to depletion. We review our unproved oil and natural gas property costs on a quarterly basis to assess possible impairment or the need to transfer unproved costs to proved properties as a result of extension or discoveries from drilling operations. We expect these costs to be evaluated in one to seven years and transferred to the depletable portion of the full cost pool during that time. The full cost pool is comprised of intangible drilling costs, lease and well equipment and exploration and development costs incurred plus costs of acquired proved and unproved leaseholds.

 

During April 2004 we initiated leasing projects to acquire shale drilling rights in both the Johnson Branch and Bethany Longstreet fields in our Northeast Louisiana operating areas. In accordance with our policy and FASB ASC Subtopic 835-20 for Capitalization of Interest, we began capitalizing interest on unproved properties.

 

We calculate depletion using the unit-of-production method. Under this method, the sum of the full cost pool and all estimated future development costs are divided by the total quantity of proved reserves. This rate is applied to our total production for the period, and the appropriate expense is recorded. We capitalize the portion of general and administrative costs, including share-based compensation that is attributable to our acquisition, exploration, exploitation and development activities.

 

Under the full cost method of accounting, sales, dispositions and other oil and natural gas property retirements are generally accounted for as adjustments to the full cost pool, with no recognition of gain or loss unless the disposition would significantly alter the relationship between capitalized costs and proved reserves. Gain or loss recognition on divestiture or abandonment of oil and natural gas properties where disposition would result in a significant alteration of the depletion rate requires allocation of a portion of the amortizable full cost pool based on the relative estimated fair value of the disposed oil and natural gas properties to the estimated fair value of total proved reserves. As discussed under “Estimates of Proved Reserves,” estimating oil and natural gas reserves involves numerous assumptions.

 

42



Table of Contents

 

Prior to our December 31, 2009 adoption of Release No. 33-8995, at the end of each quarterly period the unamortized cost of oil and natural gas properties, net of related deferred income taxes, was limited to the full cost ceiling, computed as the sum of the estimated future net revenues from our proved reserves using period-end prices, discounted at 10%, and adjusted for related income tax effects (ceiling test). In the event our capitalized costs exceeded the ceiling limitation at the end of the reporting period, we subsequently evaluated the limitation for price changes occurring after the balance sheet date to assess impairment. Beginning December 31, 2009, Release No. 33-8995 requires that the full cost ceiling be computed as the sum of the estimated future net revenues from proved reserves using the average, first-day-of-the-month price during the previous 12-month period, discounted at 10% and adjusted for related income tax effects. The new rule no longer allows a company to subsequently evaluate the limitation for subsequent prices changes. Under full cost accounting rules, any ceiling test write-downs of oil and natural gas properties may not be reversed in subsequent periods.

 

The quarterly calculation of the ceiling test is based upon estimates of proved reserves. There are numerous uncertainties inherent in estimating quantities of proved reserves, in projecting the future rates of production and in the timing of development activities. The accuracy of any reserve estimate is a function of the quality of available data and of engineering and geological interpretation and judgment. Results of drilling, testing and production subsequent to the date of the estimate may justify revision of such estimate. Accordingly, reserve estimates are often different from the quantities of oil and natural gas that are ultimately recovered.

 

Use of estimates

 

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

 

Certain significant estimates

 

Management’s estimates of oil and gas reserves are based on various assumptions, including constant oil and gas prices. It is reasonably possible that a future event in the near term could cause the estimates to change and such changes could have a severe impact. Actual future production, cash flows, taxes, operating expenses, development expenditures and quantities of recoverable oil and gas reserves may vary substantially from those assumed in the estimates. The accuracy of any reserve estimate is a function of the quality of available data, engineering and geological interpretation, and judgment. Subsequent evaluation of the same reserves based upon production history will result in variations, which may be substantial, in the estimated reserves. While it is at least reasonably possible that the estimates above will change materially in the near term, no estimate can be made of the range of possible changes that might occur.

 

Asset retirement obligations

 

We follow FASB ASC Subtopic 410-20 for Asset Retirement Obligations to account for legal obligations associated with the retirement of long-lived assets. ASC 410-20 requires these obligations be recognized at their estimated fair value at the time that the obligations are incurred. Upon initial recognition of a liability, that cost should be capitalized as part of the related long-lived asset and allocated to expense over the useful life of the asset. The costs of plugging and abandoning oil and natural gas properties fluctuate with costs associated with the industry. We periodically assess the estimated costs of our asset retirement obligations and adjust the liability according to these estimates.

 

Accounting for income taxes

 

Income taxes are accounted for using the liability method of accounting in accordance FASB ASC Topic 740 for Income Taxes. We must make certain estimates related to the reversal of temporary differences, and actual results could vary from those estimates. Deferred taxes are recorded to reflect the tax benefits and

 

43



Table of Contents

 

consequences of future years’ differences between the tax basis of assets and liabilities and their financial reporting basis. We record a valuation allowance to reduce deferred tax assets if it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized.

 

Stock-based compensation

 

We account for share-based payments to employees using the methodology prescribed in FASB ASC Topic 718 for Stock Compensation. ASC Topic 718 requires share-based compensation to be recorded with cost classifications consistent with cash compensation.

 

Subsequent Events

 

In May 2009, the FASB issued new authoritative guidance for subsequent events. Such authoritative guidance establishes general standards of accounting for, and disclosure of, events that occur after the balance sheet date but before financial statements are issued or are available to be issued.  In particular, this statement sets forth: (1) the period after the balance sheet date during which management of a reporting entity should evaluate events or transactions that may occur for potential recognition or disclosure in the financial statements, (2) the circumstances under which an entity should recognize events or transactions occurring after the balance sheet date in its financial statements and (3) the disclosures that an entity should make about events or transactions that occurred after the balance sheet date.  Adoption of this authoritative position did not have a material impact on the Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements.

 

Other Accounting Policies and Recent Accounting Pronouncements

 

On January 21, 2010, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2010-06—Fair Value Measurement and Disclosures (Topic 820): Improving Disclosures about Fair Value Measurements, or ASU 2010-06. ASU 2010-06 requires transfers, and the reasons for the transfers, between Levels 1 and 2 be disclosed, Level 3 reconciliations for fair value measurements using significant unobservable inputs should be presented on a gross basis, the fair value measurement disclosure should be reported for each class of asset and liability, and disclosures about the valuation techniques and inputs used to measure fair value for both recurring and nonrecurring will be required for fair value measurements that fall in either Level 2 or 3. The update will be effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2009. This update currently will have no impact to our financial position.

 

On December 31, 2008, the SEC issued Release No. 33-8995, amending its oil and natural gas reporting requirements for oil and natural gas producing companies. On January 16, 2010, the FASB, issued Update No. 2010-03—Extractive Activities—Oil and Gas (Topic 932): Oil and Gas Reserve Estimation and Disclosures, or Update No. 2010-03, to align the oil and gas reserve estimation and disclosure requirements of the Codification with Release No. 33-8995.

 

The effective date of the new accounting and disclosure requirements is for annual reports filed for fiscal years ending on or after December 31, 2009.

 

Among other things, Release No. 33-8995 and Update No. 2010-03:

 

·                  Revises a number of definitions relating to oil and natural gas reserves to make them consistent with the Petroleum Resource Management System, which includes certain non-traditional resources in proved reserves;

 

·                  Permits the use of new technologies for determining oil and natural gas reserves;

 

·                  Requires the use of the simple average spot prices for the trailing twelve month period using the first day of each month in the estimation of oil and natural gas reserve quantities and, for companies

 

44



Table of Contents

 

using the full cost method of accounting, in computing the ceiling limitation test, in place of a single day price as of the end of the fiscal year;

 

·                  Permits the disclosure in filings with the SEC of probable and possible reserves and sensitivity of our proved oil and natural gas reserves to changes in prices;

 

·                  Requires additional disclosures (outside of the financial statements) regarding the status of undeveloped reserves and changes in status of these from period to period; and

 

·                  Requires a discussion of the internal controls in place in the reserve estimation process and disclosure of the technical qualifications of the technical person having primary responsibility for preparing the reserve estimates.

 

Other Accounting Policies and Recent Accounting Pronouncements

 

Please see “Notes to Financial Statements — Note B — Significant accounting policies” elsewhere herein.

 

Inflation

 

Although the level of inflation affects certain of the Company’s costs and expenses, inflation did not have a significant effect on the Company’s results of operations during fiscal 2010.

 

Related Party Transactions

 

A description of our related party transactions is included in “Note F — Related party transactions” in the Notes to the Financial Statements of the Company included elsewhere in this Report, and is incorporated herein by reference.

 

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

 

We do not currently use any off-balance sheet arrangements to enhance our liquidity and capital resource positions, or for any other purpose.

 

45



Table of Contents

 

Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.

 

Commodity Price Risk

 

We are subject to price fluctuations for natural gas and crude oil. Prices received for natural gas sold on the spot market are volatile due primarily to seasonality of demand and other factors beyond our control. Reductions in crude oil, natural gas and natural gas liquids prices could have a material adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations and quantities of reserves recoverable on an economic basis. Any reduction in reserves, including reductions due to price fluctuations, can adversely affect our liquidity and our ability to obtain capital for our acquisition and development activities. To date, we have not entered into futures contracts or other hedging agreements to manage the commodity price risk for a portion of our production.

 

Interest Rate Risk

 

As of June 30, 2010, we had $32,000,000 of long-term debt outstanding under our Credit Facility, which matures on July 1, 2012, and the Wallen Note, which matures on September 30, 2012. This debt bears interest at the prime rate plus 2.0% for the Credit Facility and prime rate plus 1% for the Wallen Note. As a result, our interest costs fluctuate based on short-term interest rates. Based on the aforementioned borrowings outstanding at June 30, 2010, a 100 basis point change in interest rates would change our annual interest expense by approximately $320,000. We had no interest rate derivatives during fiscal 2010.

 

Item 8.    Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.

 

The Report of Independent Accountants, Financial Statements and any supplementary financial data required by this Item are set forth on pages F-1 through F-35 of this Report and are incorporated herein by reference.

 

Item 9.    Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure.

 

None.

 

Item 9A. Controls and Procedures.

 

Conclusion Regarding the Effectiveness of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

 

Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, we conducted an evaluation of our disclosure controls and procedures, as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act, as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on this evaluation, our principal executive officer and our principal financial officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed by us in reports we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures.

 

Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

 

Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in Rules 13a—15(f) and 15d—15(f) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, we conducted an assessment, including testing, of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of June 30, 2010 based on the criteria set forth in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the

 

46



Table of Contents

 

Treadway Commission. Our system of internal control over financial reporting is designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. Our internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of our assets; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that our receipts and expenditures are being made only in accordance with authorizations of our management and directors; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of our assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

 

Based on our evaluation under the criteria set forth in Internal Control—Integrated Framework, our management concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of June 30, 2010. This Annual Report does not include an attestation report of our independent registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting. We were not required to have, nor have we engaged our independent registered public accounting firm to perform, an audit on our internal control over financial reporting pursuant to the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission that permit us to provide only management’s report in this Annual Report.

 

Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

 

Subsequent to our evaluation, there were no changes in internal controls or other factors that could materially affect, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, these internal controls. We maintain a system of internal control over financial reporting. There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2010 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

 

Inherent Limitations on Internal Control

 

A control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. Further, the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, have been detected. These inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in decision making can be faulty, and that breakdowns can occur because of simple errors. Additionally, controls can be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more people, or by management override of the control. The design of any system of controls is also based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions. Because of the inherent limitations in a cost-effective control system, misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and not be detected.

 

Certifications

 

Our chief executive officer and chief financial officer have completed the certifications required to be filed as an exhibit to this Report (see Exhibits 31.1 and 31.2) relating to the design of our disclosure controls and procedures and the design of our internal control over financial reporting.

 

Item 9B. Other Information.

 

None.

 

47



Table of Contents

 

PART III

 

Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance.

 

Directors

 

The following table provides information concerning each of our directors as of September 8, 2010:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Director

 

Name

 

Age

 

Position(s) Held with Cubic

 

Since

 

Calvin A. Wallen, III

 

55

 

Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer

 

1997

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Jon S. Ross

 

46

 

Corporate Secretary and Director

 

1998

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Gene C. Howard

 

83

 

Director

 

1991

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Herbert A. Bayer

 

61

 

Director

 

2003

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Bob L. Clements

 

67

 

Director

 

2004

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Phyllis K. Harding

 

64

 

Director

 

2009

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

William L. Bruggeman, Jr.

 

83

 

Director

 

2009

 

 

CALVIN A. WALLEN, III has served as the President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company since December 1997, and as Chairman of the Board of Directors since June 1999. Mr. Wallen has over 20 years of experience in the oil and gas industry working as a drilling and petroleum engineer. Prior to joining Cubic, Mr. Wallen was employed by Superior Oil and various other drilling contractors including Resource, Tom Brown and Rowan International. Mr. Wallen assisted in the design and construction of several land rigs with advanced drilling systems and has domestic and international experience in drilling engineering. While employed by Rowan International, Mr. Wallen gained experience in drilling high angle directional wells at Prudhoe Bay on contract to Arco. In 1982, Mr. Wallen began acquiring and developing oil and gas properties, forming a production company that has evolved into Tauren Exploration, Inc. Mr. Wallen attended Texas A&M University at College Station, Texas.

 

JON S. ROSS has served as a director of the Company since April 1998 and as Secretary since November 1998. Since 1989, Mr. Ross has been a practicing attorney in Dallas, Texas representing over 80 business entities. He has served on several community and not-for-profit committees and boards and has been asked to speak to corporate and civic leaders on a variety of corporate law topics. Mr. Ross graduated from St. Mark’s School of Texas with honors in 1982 and graduated from the University of Texas at Austin in 1986 with a B.B.A. in Accounting. He then graduated from the University of Texas School of Law in 1989 attaining a Juris Doctorate degree.

 

GENE C. HOWARD is the Senior  Partner of the law firm of Howard, Widdows, and Bufogle, P.C. of Tulsa, Oklahoma and has been engaged primarily in the private practice of law over the past thirty-five years. Mr. Howard served in the Oklahoma State Senate from 1964 through 1982 and was President Pro Tem from 1975 through 1981. In addition, he served as the Chairman of the Board of Farmers and Exchange Bank from 1972 through 1991 and on the Board of Directors of Local Federal Bank of Oklahoma. Mr. Howard is a Director of the Oklahoma State Education and Employment Group Insurance Board and presently acts as Chairman. Mr. Howard served as Director of EntreCap Financial Corporation and Hinderliter Construction, Inc. from 1991 to August of 1992.

 

HERBERT A. BAYER has served as a director of the Company since May 2003. From 2006 to 2008, Mr. Bayer served as Global Director of Wi-Fi and Municipal Markets for SmartSynch, Inc., which provides

 

48



Table of Contents

 

GPRS and Wi-Fi Smart Metering Technology for Smart Grid Deployments for the electric utility industry. Prior to joining SmartSynch, Mr. Bayer served as Director of Client Services for CH2M HILL, an engineering, construction and operations company, from 2005 to 2006, and National Director of Sales for Hexagram Inc. from 2003 to 2005. During his career, Mr. Bayer has worked with investor-owned utilities, government-run municipalities and electric cooperatives. His work experience includes work in Electronic Meter Reading, Automatic Meter Reading, Load Research, Internet Applications, and Wi-Fi Network Systems. Mr. Bayer’s major course of study at Indiana State University was Business Management.

 

BOB L. CLEMENTS joined the Company’s board of directors in February 2004. Mr. Clements has been in the wholesale food and restaurant business for over thirty years, currently controlling the largest independent producer of stuffed jalapenos and corn dogs as well as two successful restaurants in the Rockwall, Texas area. Mr. Clements has served and currently serves on a variety of not-for-profit and charitable committees and boards. Mr. Clements has a degree in the OPM Program from the Harvard Business School.

 

PHYLLIS K. HARDING joined Cubic’s Board of Directors in April 2009.  She has worked as an executive advisor for Diversified Dynamics Corporation, a privately held corporation controlled by William L. Bruggeman, Jr. since 1990.  From 2001 through 2008, she served on the Board of Directors of Dayport, a leader in video publishing, content, workflow and syndication solutions.  Dayport was acquired by EntriQ in 2008.  Ms. Harding has also served as Director since 2009 for Geospan Corporation and Geospan.com.  Geospan Corporation is a privately held industry leader in spatial imaging and visual mapping solutions.  She has worked with numerous corporations in various industries as the head of the consulting division for Grant Thornton LLP in Minneapolis from 1987 through 1988 and as a co-owner of Camelot Consultants, Inc. from 1989 through 1999.  Ms. Harding has three decades of operational, manufacturing, turn-around and strategic leadership experience with various clients and direct employment at The Valspar Corporation (1986 through 1987) and Procter & Gamble (1975 through 1986).  Ms. Harding is a graduate of the University of Wisconsin - Green Bay.

 

WILLIAM L. BRUGGEMAN, JR. joined the Company’s board in April 2009. He is the founder and controlling shareholder of Diversified Dynamics Corporation (founded in 1968) and its business divisions: Cat Pumps, a manufacturer of quality, industrial, positive displacement, triplex piston and plunger pumps and custom engineered pumping systems with over 40 years of experience in industrial high pressure systems; and HomeRight, as manufacturer of home improvement products.  Mr. Bruggeman has served as Director since 2009 for Geospan Corporation and Geospan.com.  Geospan Corporation is a privately held industry leader in spatial imaging and visual mapping solutions.  He is an entrepreneur and “angel investor” who has been involved in many successful start-up businesses.  He has been a significant investor in the oil and gas industries since the early 1990’s.  Mr. Bruggeman continues to be a major shareholder of Cubic Energy, Inc.  Mr. Bruggeman’s former employers include: McCullough Corporation, John Deere, L & A Products, and Minneapolis Moline.  Mr. Bruggeman is a veteran who served thirty months in the U.S. Navy in World War II and one year in the U.S. Marine Corp in Korea.  He has been a pilot for small engine planes and jets for 62 years.  Mr. Bruggeman graduated from Hamline University in St. Paul, Minnesota with a degree in Engineering.

 

There are no family relationships among any of the directors or executive officers of the Company. See “Certain Relationships and Related Transactions” for a description of transactions between the Company and its directors, executive officers or their affiliates.

 

49



Table of Contents

 

Executive Officers

 

Name

 

Age

 

Position(s) Held with Cubic

 

Since

 

Calvin A. Wallen, III*

 

55

 

Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer

 

1997

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Larry G. Badgley

 

53

 

Chief Financial Officer

 

2008

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Jon S. Ross*

 

46

 

Corporate Secretary and Director

 

1998

 

 

See Mr. Wallen and Mr. Ross’s biography above.

 

LARRY G. BADGLEY joined the Company in August 2008, as a consultant, and was appointed Chief Financial Officer in October 2008. Prior to joining the Company, from October 2005 through September 2006, Mr. Badgley served as Managing Director of BridgePoint Consulting, a provider of CFO services to venture capital-backed and early stage companies. In that capacity, Mr. Badgley was primarily responsible for strategic planning for growth companies. From July 1998 through October 2005, Mr. Badgley served as Director of Accounting and Finance for Jefferson Wells International, an international professional services firm. Prior to that time, Mr. Badgley served as Chief Operating Officer and Chief Financial Officer of a privately held national sign manufacturer until its sale in July 1998. Mr. Badgley received a BBA in Finance from Hardin-Simmons University and is a Certified Public Accountant.

 

Audit Committee; Financial Expert

 

The Audit Committee is comprised of Messrs. Howard (Chairman), Clements and Bayer. All of the members of the Audit Committee are “independent” under the rules of the SEC and the NYSE-Amex, LLC. The Board of Directors after reviewing all of the relevant facts, circumstances and attributes, has determined that Mr. Howard is the sole “audit committee financial expert” on the Audit Committee.

 

Compliance with Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act

 

Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires the Company’s directors, executive officers, and holders of more than 10% of the common stock to file with the SEC reports of ownership and changes in ownership of common stock. SEC regulations require those directors, executive officers, and greater than 10% shareholders to furnish the Company with copies of all Section 16(a) forms they file. Based on the Company’s review of reports, the Company believes that the directors, executive officers, and greater than 10% shareholders complied with all applicable Section 16(a) filing requirements during fiscal 2010.

 

Director Independence

 

Messrs. Howard, Clements, Bayer and Bruggeman and Ms. Harding meet the independence standards for independent directors under the rules of the SEC and the rules of the AMEX, Messrs. Howard, Clements and Bayer also meet the independence standards for independent directors applicable to serving on the Audit Committee, under the rules of the SEC and the rules of the AMEX.

 

50



Table of Contents

 

Code of Ethics

 

The Company has adopted a Code of Ethics that applies to its directors, officers and employees. The Company will provide a copy of its Code of Ethics, without charge, to any stockholder who makes such request in writing to the Company, attention:  Secretary.

 

Item 11. Executive Compensation.

 

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

 

General. Our Board of Directors has established a Compensation Committee, comprised entirely of independent non-employee directors, with authority to set all forms of compensation of our executive officers. Messrs. Bayer, Clements and Howard comprised the Compensation Committee in fiscal 2010, with Mr. Howard serving as its Chairman. The Compensation Committee has overall responsibility for our executive compensation policies as provided in a written charter adopted by the Board of Directors. The Compensation Committee is empowered to review and approve the annual compensation and compensation procedures for our executives: the President and Chief Executive Officer, the Chief Financial Officer, and the Secretary. The Compensation Committee does not delegate any of its functions to others in setting compensation.

 

When establishing base salaries, cash bonuses and equity grants for each of the executives, the Compensation Committee considers the recommendations of the President and Chief Executive Officer and the Secretary, the executive’s role and contribution to the management team, responsibilities and performance during the past year and future anticipated contributions, corporate performance, and the amount of total compensation paid to executives in similar positions, and performing similar functions, at other companies for which data was available, as provided by third party compensation studies. One such study, published in September 2009 by Salary.com was a blind survey of over 1,000 companies located in the Dallas metropolitan area in the “Energy & Utilities” industry with less than 25 full-time equivalent employees. Another study, published in December 2008, included data from a survey of the following comparable companies: Abraxas Petroleum Corporation, Arena Resources, Inc., ATP Oil & Gas, Berry Petroleum Company, Canadian Superior Energy, Edge Petroleum and Goodrich Petroleum Corporation.

 

The Compensation Committee relies upon its judgment in making compensation decisions, after reviewing the Company’s performance and evaluating each executive’s performance during the year. The Committee generally does not adhere to formulas or necessarily react to short-term changes in business performance in determining the amount and mix of compensation elements. We incorporate flexibility into our compensation programs and in the assessment process to respond to and adjust for the evolving business environment.

 

Compensation Philosophy. The Compensation Committee’s compensation philosophy is to reward executive officers for the achievement of short and long-term corporate objectives and for individual performance. The objective of this philosophy is to provide a balance between short-term goals and long-term priorities to achieve immediate objectives while also focusing on increasing shareholder value over the long term. Also, to ensure that we are strategically and competitively positioned for the future, the Compensation Committee has the discretion to attribute significant weight to other factors in determining executive compensation, such as maintaining competitiveness, pursuing growth opportunities and achieving other long-range business and operating objectives. The level of compensation should also allow us to attract, motivate, and retain talented executive officers that contribute to our long-term success. The compensation of our President and Chief Executive Officer and other executive officers is comprised of cash compensation and long-term incentive compensation in the form of base salary, discretionary bonuses and stock awards.

 

51



Table of Contents

 

Executive Compensation Components. Our total compensation for the named executive officers consisted of:

 

·                  base salary,

·                  bonuses and

·                  long-term incentives in the form of common stock awards.

 

The Compensation committee believes that each of these components is necessary to achieve Cubic’s objective of retaining highly qualified executives and motivating the named executive officers to maximize shareholder return.

 

In setting fiscal 2010 compensation, the Compensation Committee considered the specific factors discussed below:

 

Base Salary. In setting the executive officers’ base salaries, the Compensation Committee considers the achievement of corporate objectives as well as individual performance. Because the Compensation Committee believes that executive compensation should be viewed in terms of a balanced combination of cash compensation (i.e., base salaries and bonuses) and long-term incentive (i.e., grants of stock), base salaries are targeted to approximate the low end of the range of base salaries paid to executives of similar companies for each position. To ensure that each executive is paid appropriately, the Compensation Committee considers the executive’s level of responsibility, prior experience, overall knowledge, contribution to business results, existing equity holdings, executive pay for similar positions in other companies, and executive pay within our company.

 

The base salaries paid to our named executive officers during fiscal 2010 are set forth below in the Summary Compensation Table. There were no increases in executive officers base salaries during fiscal 2010

 

Discretionary Bonuses. Executive bonuses are intended to link executive compensation with the attainment of Company goals. The actual payment of bonuses is primarily dependent upon the extent to which these Company-wide objectives are achieved. Determination of executive bonus amounts is not made in accordance with a strict formula, but rather is based on objective data combined with competitive ranges and internal policies and practices, including an overall review of both individual and corporate performance. No bonuses were paid to our named executive officers during fiscal 2010. For fiscal years 2008 and 2009, bonuses to executives were primarily based upon the achievement of certain business objectives including progress in meeting our expected drilling and completion schedule, and obtaining additional financing. The President and Chief Executive Officer has the discretion to recommend to the Compensation Committee to increase or decrease bonuses for all other executive officers, but any bonus amounts must be approved by the Compensation Committee.

 

Long-Term Incentives. On December 29, 2005, the shareholders of the Company approved the 2005 Stock Option Plan (the “Plan”) under which our executive officers may be, among other forms of compensation, compensated through grants of shares of our common stock and/or grants of options to purchase shares of common stock. The Compensation Committee approves Plan grants that provide additional incentives and align the executives’ long-term interests with those of the shareholders of the Company by tying executive compensation to the long-term performance of the Company’s stock price. Annual equity grants for our executives are typically approved in January.

 

The Compensation Committee recommends equity to be granted to an executive with respect to shares of common stock based on the following principal elements including, but not limited to:

 

·                  President and Chief Executive Officer’s and Secretary’s recommendations;

 

·                  Management role and contribution to the management team;

 

·                  Job responsibilities and past performance;

 

52



Table of Contents

 

·                  Future anticipated contributions;

 

·                  Corporate performance; and

 

·                  Existing equity holdings.

 

Determination of equity grant amounts is not made in accordance with a formula, but rather is based on objective data combined with competitive ranges, past internal policies and practices and an overall review of both individual and corporate performance. Equity grants may also be made to new executives upon commencement of employment and, on occasion, to executives in connection with a significant change in job responsibility. The Compensation Committee believes annual equity grants more closely align the long-term interests of executives with those of shareholders and assist in the retention of key executives. As such, these grants comprise the Company’s principal long-term incentive to executives.

 

Other Compensation Policies Affecting the Executive Officers

 

Stock Ownership Requirements. The Compensation Committee does not maintain a policy relating to stock ownership guidelines or requirements for our executive officers because the Compensation Committee does not feel that it is necessary to impose such a policy on our executive officers. If circumstances change, the Compensation Committee will review whether such a policy is appropriate for executive officers.

 

Employment Agreements. On February 29, 2008, the Company entered into employment agreements with its President and Chief Executive Officer, Calvin A. Wallen, III, and Secretary, Jon S. Ross. The agreement with Mr. Wallen provides for a base salary of $200,000 per year, while the agreement with Mr. Ross provides for a base salary of $150,000 per year. The other terms and conditions of the agreements are substantially consistent.

 

Both agreements provide for a term of employment of 36 months from the effective date of February 1, 2008, which term shall be automatically extended by one additional month upon the expiration of each month during the term; provided, that the Company may terminate subsequent one-month extensions at any time. Each agreement is subject to early termination by the Company in the event that the employee dies, becomes totally disabled or commits an act constituting “Just Cause” under the agreement. The agreements provide that Just Cause includes, among other things, the conviction of certain crimes, habitual neglect of his duties to the Company or other material breaches by the employee of the agreement. Each agreement also provides that the employee shall be permitted to terminate his employment upon the occurrence of “Good Reason,” as defined in the agreement. The agreements provide that Good Reason includes, among other things, a material diminution in the employee’s authority, duties, responsibilities or salary, or the relocation of the Company’s principal offices by more than 50 miles. If the employee’s employment is terminated by (a) the Company other than due to the employee’s death, disability or Just Cause, or (b) the employee for Good Reason, then the Company is required to pay all remaining salary through the end of the then-current term. The foregoing severance payment is subject to reduction under certain conditions.

 

The following table sets forth the estimated amounts that would be payable to each of the named executives upon a termination under the scenarios outlined above, excluding termination for Just Cause or on account of death or disability, assuming that such termination occurred on June 30, 2010. There can be no assurance that these scenarios would produce the same or similar results as those disclosed if a termination occurs in the future.

 

53



Table of Contents

 

 

 

Severance

 

 

 

Without Just Cause/For Good Reason

 

Payment (1)

 

Total

 

Calvin A. Wallen, III

 

$

600,000

 

$

600,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Jon S. Ross

 

$

450,000

 

$

450,000

 

 


(1)       Represents 36 months of base salary.

 

Tax Considerations

 

Compliance with Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code. Section 162(m) disallows a federal income tax deduction to publicly held companies for certain compensation paid to our Named Executive Officers to the extent that compensation exceeds $1 million per executive officer covered by Section 162(m) in any fiscal year. The limitation applies only to compensation that is not considered “performance based” as defined in the Section 162(m) rules. In designing our compensation programs, the Compensation Committee considers the effect of Section 162(m) together with other factors relevant to our business needs. We have historically taken, and intend to continue taking, appropriate actions, to the extent we believe desirable, to preserve the deductibility of annual incentive and long-term performance awards. However, the Compensation Committee has not adopted a policy that all compensation paid must be tax-deductible and qualified under Section 162(m). We believe that the fiscal 2010 base salary, annual bonus and stock grants paid to the individual executive officers covered by Section 162(m) did not exceed the Section 162(m) limit and will be fully deductible under Section 162(m).

 

Chief Executive Officer Compensation

 

Mr. Wallen received $200,000 in base salary for fiscal 2010. His annual base salary was not increased for fiscal year 2009. Mr. Wallen received no common stock awards during fiscal 2010.

 

Chief Financial Officer Compensation

 

Mr. Badgley’s salary has been established at $145,000 per year, plus a $300 per month health insurance subsidy. In February 2010, the health insurance subsidy increased to $500 per month. In the event that Mr. Badgley is terminated without cause, as determined by the Board of Directors of the Company, he will be entitled to three months salary. The Company and Mr. Badgley did not enter into a written employment agreement.

 

54



Table of Contents

 

Summary Compensation Table

 

The following table shows information regarding the compensation earned during the fiscal years ended June 30, 2010, 2009 and 2008 by our Chief Executive Officer, our Chief Financial Officer, and our other most highly compensated executive officer who was employed by us as of June 30, 2010 and whose total compensation exceeded $100,000 during the most recent fiscal year (the “Named Executive Officers”):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Non-Equity

 

All Other

 

 

 

Name and

 

Fiscal

 

 

 

 

 

Stock

 

Option

 

Incentive Plan

 

Compen-

 

 

 

Principal Position

 

Year

 

Salary

 

Bonus

 

Awards (1)

 

Awards

 

Compensation

 

sation (2)

 

Total

 

Calvin A. Wallen, III

 

2010

 

$

200,000

 

$

 

$

 

$

 

$

 

$

4,800

 

$

204,800

 

Chairman of the Board,

 

2009

 

$

200,000

 

$

 

$

 

$

 

$

 

$

3,600

 

$

203,600

 

President and Chief Executive Officer

 

2008

 

$

170,833

 

$

 

$

241,500

 

$

 

$

 

$

3,600

 

$

415,933

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Larry G. Badgley

 

2010

 

$

145,000

 

$

 

$

 

$

 

$

 

$

4,800

 

$

149,800

 

Chief Financial Officer  

(3)

2009

 

$

103,293

 

$

750

 

$

 

$

 

$

 

$

2,700

 

$

106,743

 

 

 

2008

 

$

 

$

 

$

 

$

 

$

 

$

 

$

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Jon S. Ross

 

2010

 

$

150,000

 

$

 

$

 

$

 

$

 

$

4,800

 

$

154,800

 

Secretary and Director

 

2009

 

$

150,000

 

$

2,625

 

$

 

$

 

$

 

$

3,600

 

$

156,225

 

 

 

2008

 

$

120,833

 

$

2,000

 

$

161,000

 

$

 

$

 

$

3,600

 

$

287,433

 

 


(1)                                  This column represents the dollar amount recognized for financial statement reporting purposes with respect to the 2010, 2009 and 2008 fiscal years for the fair value of stock grants for each of the named executive officers in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718 (formerly SFAS No. 123R). On January 31, 2008 we granted our Named Executive Officers a total of 250,000 shares of common stock as follows: Mr. Wallen, 150,000 shares; and Mr. Ross, 100,000 shares. These shares vested immediately on the grant date.

 

(2)                                  All Other Compensation consists solely of a $500 per month (increased in February 2010 from $300) reimbursement towards each officer’s medical insurance premiums. The Company does not provide group health insurance coverage to its employees.

 

(3)                                  Mr. Badgley was appointed Cubic’s Chief Financial Officer effective October 13, 2008.

 

Fiscal 2010 Grants of Plan-Based Awards

 

No stock options were granted to executive officers for the periods presented.

 

Stock Grants

 

On January 31 and February 4, 2008, the Company issued 555,000 and 52,500 shares, respectively, to the officers and directors, and key employees of the Company pursuant to the Plan. As of such dates, the aggregate market value of the common stock granted was $893,550 and $84,525 (a total of $978,075), respectively, based on the then-market price on the OTCBB of the Company’s common stock. Recent SEC guidance requires that immediately-vesting common stock grants with no forfeiture provisions be expensed at the time of grant rather than amortized over the four quarters of the service period. Accordingly, the full $978,075 was recorded as compensation expense and included in general and administrative expenses for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2008. The Named Executive Officers received the following grants: (i) 150,000 shares to Calvin A. Wallen, III, (ii) 100,000 shares to Jon S. Ross.

 

On January 12, 2009, the Company issued 235,000 shares to three directors of the Company pursuant to the Plan.  As of such dates, the aggregate market value of the common stock granted was $385,400 based on the last sale price ($1.64 per share) on the aforementioned date, on the AMEX, of the Company’s common stock. Such amounts were expensed upon issuance to compensation expense.

 

55



Table of Contents

 

On February 3, 2010, the Company issued 370,014 shares to five non-employee directors of the Company pursuant to the Plan.  As of such dates, the aggregate market value of the common stock granted was $395,915 based on the last sale price ($1.07 per share) on the aforementioned date, on the AMEX of the Company’s common stock. Such amounts were recorded as compensation expense upon issuance.

 

All of the foregoing issuances and grants were made in reliance upon an exemption from registration set forth in Regulation D and/or Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, which exempts transactions by an issuer not involving a public offering.

 

Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End

 

The Company had no outstanding stock options at June 30, 2010. The Company had no unvested stock awards at the end of fiscal 2010.

 

Option Exercises and Stock Vesting

 

No stock options were outstanding at any time during fiscal 2010 and thus any reference to option exercises has been omitted.

 

Information Related to Stock-Based Compensation

 

The Company accounts for its stock-based employee compensation plans pursuant to FASB ASC Topic 718-Stock Compensation. ASC Topic 718 requires all share-based payments to employees, including grants of employee stock options, to be recognized in our consolidated statements of operations based on their estimated fair values. We recognize expense on a straight-line basis over the vesting period of the option.

 

Pension Benefits and Non-Qualified Defined Contribution Plans

 

The Company does not sponsor any qualified or non-qualified defined benefit plans or non-qualified defined contribution plans. The Compensation Committee, which is comprised solely of “outside directors” as defined for purposes of Section 162(m) of the Code, may elect to adopt qualified or non-qualified defined benefit or non-qualified contribution plans if the Compensation Committee determines that doing so is in our best interests.

 

Non-Employee Director Compensation for Fiscal 2010

 

Our philosophy in determining director compensation is to align compensation with the long-term interests of the stockholders, adequately compensate the directors for their time and effort, and establish an overall compensation package that will attract and retain qualified directors. In determining overall director compensation, we seek to strike the right balance between the cash and stock components of director compensation. The Board’s policy is that the directors should hold equity ownership in the Company and that a portion of the director fees should consist of Company equity in the form of stock grants.

 

Our retainer and meeting fee schedule remained the same for fiscal 2010 as it was in 2009 and 2008. Each non-employee director of the Company received cash compensation as follows:

 

·                  A meeting fee of $1,000 for each board or committee meeting attended (whether in person or via teleconference);

·                  Each non-employee director as of January 2010 received: 40,000 shares of common stock for service on the Board of Directors; 20,000 shares of common stock for service on the Audit Committee; and, 15,000 shares of common stock for service on the Compensation Committee. Mr. Howard received an additional 10,000 shares of common stock for serving as the financial expert and Chairman of the Audit Committee.

 

56



Table of Contents

 

The following table sets forth the cash and other compensation paid to the non-employee members of our Board of Directors in 2010.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Change in Pension

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Value and

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Non-Equity

 

Nonqualified

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fees Earned

 

 

 

 

 

Incentive Plan

 

Deferred

 

All Other

 

 

 

 

 

or Paid in

 

Stock

 

Option

 

Compensation

 

Compenstion

 

Compensation

 

 

 

Name

 

Cash ($)

 

Awards ($) (1)

 

Awards ($)

 

($)

 

Earnings

 

($)

 

Total ($)

 

Gene C. Howard

 

$

19,000

 

$

90,950

 

$

 

$

 

(N/A)

 

$

 

$

109,950

 

Herbert A. Bayer

 

19,000

 

80,250

 

 

 

(N/A)

 

 

99,250

 

Bob L. Clements

 

19,000

 

80,250

 

 

 

(N/A)

 

 

99,250

 

Phyllis K. Harding

 

15,000

 

72,232

 

 

 

(N/A)

 

 

87,232

 

William L. Bruggeman, Jr.

 

13,000

 

72,232

 

 

 

(N/A)

 

 

85,232

 

 


(1)                                  The market value of these stock awards is based on the closing price of the date of the grant, which was $1.07 on January 26, 2010.

 

57



Table of Contents

 

Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters.

 

The following table sets forth the number of shares of the Company’s common stock beneficially owned, as of September 8, 2010 by (i) each person known to the Company to beneficially own more than 5% of the common stock of the Company (the only class of voting securities now outstanding), (ii) each Director and Named Executive Officer, and (iii)   all directors and executive officers as a group. Unless otherwise indicated, we consider all shares of common stock that can be issued under convertible securities or warrants currently or within 60 days of September 8, 2010 to be outstanding for the purpose of computing the percentage ownership of the person holding those securities, but do not consider those securities to be outstanding for computing the percentage ownership of any other person. Each owner’s percentage is calculated by dividing the number of shares beneficially held by that owner by the sum of 75,394,579, plus the number of shares that owner has the right to acquire within 60 days.

 

 

 

 

 

Approximate

 

 

 

Number

 

Percent of

 

Name and Address

 

of Shares

 

Class (1)

 

5% Stockholders

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Wells Fargo Energy Capital, Inc.

 

13,544,900

(2)

15.2

%

1000 Louisiana 9th Floor, Houston, TX 77002

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Steven S. Bruggeman

 

3,930,495

(3)

5.1

%

5609 St. Albans Circle, Shoreview, MN 55126

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Named Executive Officers and Directors

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Calvin A. Wallen, III

 

28,746,881

(4)

34.1

%

9870 Plano Road, Dallas, TX 75238

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

William L. Bruggeman, Jr.

 

17,733,978

(5)

23.3

%

20 Anemone Circle, North Oaks, MN 55127

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Bob L. Clements

 

982,527

(6)

1.3

%

9870 Plano Road, Dallas, TX 75238

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Gene C. Howard

 

800,180

(7)

1.1

%

2402 East 29th St., Tulsa, OK 74114

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Jon S. Ross

 

433,000

(8)

*

 

9870 Plano Road, Dallas, TX 75238

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Herbert A. Bayer

 

405,287

(9)

*

 

9870 Plano Road, Dallas, TX 75238

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Phyllis K. Harding

 

858,970

(10)

1.1

%

1681 94th Lane N.E., Minneapolis, MN 55449

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Larry G. Badgley

 

(11)

*

 

9870 Plano Road, Dallas, TX 75238

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

All officers and directors as a group (8 persons)

 

49,960,823

 

58.9

%

 


* Denotes less than one percent

 

(1)                                  Based on a total of 75,394,579 shares of Common Stock issued and outstanding on June 30, 2010.

(2)                                  Includes warrants to purchase 8,500,000 shares and a promissory note convertible into 5,044,900 shares.

 

58



Table of Contents

 

(3)                                 Includes 831,745 shares held jointly by Steven S. Bruggeman and his spouse as joint tenants with rights of survivorship; 65,250 shares held by Mr. Bruggeman’s spouse, of which Mr. Bruggeman disclaims beneficial ownership and, 2,033,500 shares and warrants to purchase 1,000,000 shares individually held by Steven S. Bruggeman.

(4)                                  Includes 10,350,000 shares plus 8,825,333 shares issuable upon conversion of preferred shares held by Langtry Mineral and Development, LLC, an entity controlled by Mr. Wallen; 700,000 shares held by Tauren Exploration, Inc., an entity controlled by Mr. Wallen; 500,000 shares held by Mr. Wallen’s spouse; 386,000 shares held by minor children; and 7,985,548 held by Mr. Wallen.

(5)                                  Includes 2,034,000 shares and warrants to purchase 600,000 shares held by Diversified Dynamics Corporation, a company controlled by William Bruggeman; 40,000 shares owned by Mr. Bruggeman; 120,000 shares owned by Consumer Products Corp., in which Mr. Bruggeman’s spouse is a joint owner; and, 14,939,978 shares owned by Mr. and Mrs. Bruggeman, as joint tenants with rights of survivorship.

(6)                                  Includes 109,527 shares held with Mr. Clements’ spouse as joint tenants with rights of survivorship; and, warrants to purchase 50,000 shares.

(7)                                  Includes 322,245 shares are held by Mr. Howard’s spouse, of which Mr. Howard disclaims beneficial ownership.

(8)                                  Includes 6,000 shares held by minor children.

(9)                                  Includes 365,287 shares held with Mr. Bayer’s spouse as joint tenants with rights of survivorship.

 

Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence.

 

Certain Relationships and Related Transactions

 

Effective January 1, 2002, the Company entered into a lease agreement with respect to the Company’s principle offices with Tauren Exploration, Inc. (“Tauren”), an entity wholly owned by Calvin A. Wallen, III, the Company’s Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer. The lease agreement required payments to Tauren of $2,229 per month, and requires the Company to pay a pro rata share of the costs, without markup, of the expenses and personnel of Tauren used by the Company. During fiscal 2010, the Company paid an aggregate of $ 26,748 to Tauren pursuant to this agreement.

 

Tauren owns a working interest in the wells in which the Company owns a working interest. As of June 30, 2010, the Company owed $78,679 to Tauren for miscellaneous general and administrative expenses paid by Tauren on the Company’s behalf; as of June 30, 2009, the Company owed $649,205 to Tauren for miscellaneous general and administrative expenses paid by Tauren on the Company’s behalf.

 

In addition, during fiscal 2010, 2009 and 2008, certain wells in which the Company owns a working interest were operated by an affiliated company, Fossil Operating, Inc. (“Fossil”), an entity wholly owned by Mr. Wallen.  In consideration for Fossil serving as operator and to satisfy the Company’s working interest obligations related to drilling costs and lease operating expenses, Cubic paid to Fossil an aggregate of $1,384,308, $4,244,397 and $14,288,122 during fiscal 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively; and Fossil paid Cubic an aggregate of $ 643,688, $151,680 and $310,407 during fiscal 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively for oil and gas sales. As of June 30, 2010, 2009 and 2008, the Company owed Fossil $755,683, $815,239 and $862,895, respectively, for drilling costs and lease operating expenses, and was owed by Fossil $415,282, $271,615 and $450,669, respectively, for oil and gas sales.  The Company and Fossil have operating agreements with respect to all wells for which Fossil serves as operator.

 

On May 6, 2008, the Company issued a subordinated promissory note in the amount of $2,000,000 (the “Subordinated Note”) to Diversified Dynamics Corporation (the “Lender”), an entity controlled by William Bruggeman, who beneficially owns more than 5% of the common stock of the Company. The Subordinated Note bore interest at a fluctuating rate equal to the sum of the prime rate plus two percent (2%) per annum, and was scheduled to mature on April 30, 2010. As consideration for the loan made by Lender pursuant to the Subordinated Note, the Company agreed to convey to Lender, upon the repayment in full of the indebtedness evidenced by the Subordinated Note and the repayment in full of the senior indebtedness evidenced by the Credit Facility with Wells Fargo, an undivided 0.375% net profits interest in the future

 

59



Table of Contents

 

production of hydrocarbons from or attributable to Cubic’s net interest in its Louisiana properties. The proceeds of the Subordinated Note were being used for general corporate and working capital purposes.

 

On November 24, 2009, the Company entered into transactions with Tauren and Langtry Mineral & Development, LLC (“Langtry”), both of which are entities controlled by Calvin Wallen III, the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, under which the Company has acquired $30,952,810 in pre-paid drilling credits (the “Drilling Credits”) applicable towards the development of its Haynesville Shale rights in Northwest Louisiana. The Company expects to use the Drilling Credits to fund $30,952,810 of its share of the drilling and completion costs for those horizontal Haynesville Shale wells drilled in sections previously operated by an affiliate of the Company, which are now operated by a third party.

 

As consideration for the Drilling Credits, the Company, (a) has conveyed to Tauren a net overriding royalty interest of approximately 2% in its leasehold rights below the Taylor Sand formation of the Cotton Valley and (b) has issued to Langtry 10,350,000 Company common shares and preferred stock in the amount of $10,350,000, convertible into Company common shares at $1.20 per common share, five year conversion term. The preferred stock is entitled to cumulative dividends equal to 8% per annum, payable quarterly, which dividends may be paid in cash or in additional shares of preferred stock, in the Company’s discretion. The preferred stock may be redeemed by the Company at any time, at a redemption price equal to 20% over the original issue price.

 

The consideration described above was determined based upon negotiations between Tauren and a Special Committee of the Company’s directors, excluding Mr. Wallen. The Special Committee obtained an “fairness opinion” from its independent financial advisor with respect to the fairness, from a financial point of view, to the public stockholders of the Company, of such transactions.

 

On December 18, 2009, the Company issued a subordinated promissory note payable to Mr. Wallen, in the principal amount of $2,000,000 (the “Wallen Note”). This note bears interest at the prime rate plus one percent (1%), with interest payable monthly. The Wallen Note was entered into with the consent of Wells Fargo and the outstanding principal balance is due and payable on September 30, 2012 and is subordinated to the indebtedness under the Amended Credit Agreement. The proceeds of this note were used to repay the Subordinated Note and the net profits interests were conveyed.

 

It is the Company’s policy that any transactions between us and related parties will be on terms no less favorable than could be obtained from unaffiliated third parties and will be approved by a majority of the disinterested members of our Board of Directors.

 

60



Table of Contents

 

Item 14. Principal Accountant Fees and Services.

 

 

 

July 1, 2009 -

 

July 1, 2008 -

 

 

 

June 30, 2010

 

June 30, 2009

 

Audit fees

 

$

35,700

 

$

35,500

 

Audit-related fees

 

15,000

 

12,300

 

Tax fees

 

3,800

 

5,000

 

All other fees

 

13,060

 

2,280

 

Total

 

$

67,560

 

$

55,080

 

 

Audit Fees

 

Aggregate audit fees billed for professional services rendered by Philip Vogel & Co., PC were $35,700 for the year ended June 30, 2010 and $35,500 for the year ended June 30, 2009. Such fees were primarily for professional services rendered for the audits of our consolidated financial statements during the fiscal years ended June 30, 2010 and 2009.

 

Audit-Related Fees

 

Aggregate audit-related fees billed for professional services rendered by Philip Vogel & Co., PC were $15,000 for the year ended June 30, 2010 and $12,300 for the year ended June 30, 2009. Such fees were for limited reviews of our unaudited condensed consolidated interim financial statements.

 

Tax Fees

 

Aggregate income tax compliance and related services fees billed for professional services rendered by Philip Vogel & Co., PC were $3,800 for the year ended June 30, 2010 and $5,000 for the year ended June 30, 2009.

 

All Other Fees

 

In addition to the fees described above, aggregate fees of: $13,060 were billed by Philip Vogel & Co., PC during the year ended June 30, 2010, primarily for the review of various SEC filings, attendance at our annual shareholders’ meeting; and $2,280 were billed by Philip Vogel & Co., PC during the year ended June 30, 2009, primarily for the review of various SEC filings, attendance at our annual shareholders’ meeting, and for research regarding our compliance with Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

 

Audit Committee Pre-Approval Policies and Procedures

 

In accordance with Company policy, any additional audit or non-audit services must be approved in advance. All of the foregoing professional services provided by Philip Vogel & Co., PC during the years ended June 30, 2010 and June 30, 2009 were pre-approved in accordance with the policies of our Audit Committee.

 

61



Table of Contents

 

SIGNATURES

 

Pursuant to requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned; thereunto duly authorized, on February 23, 2011.

 

 

CUBIC ENERGY, INC.

 

 

 

By:

/s/ Calvin A. Wallen, III

 

 

Calvin A. Wallen, III

 

 

President and Chief

 

 

Executive Officer

 

 

 

 

By:

/s/ Larry G. Badgley

 

 

Larry G. Badgley

 

 

Chief Financial Officer

 

Pursuant to requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

 

Signature

 

Title

 

Date

/s/ Calvin A. Wallen, III

 

Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer (principal executive officer)

 

February 23, 2011

Calvin A. Wallen, III

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

/s/ Larry G. Badgley

 

Chief Financial Officer (principal financial and accounting officer)

 

February 23, 2011

Larry G. Badgley

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

/s/ Jon S. Ross

 

Secretary and Director

 

February 23, 2011

Jon S. Ross

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

/s/ Gene C. Howard

 

Director

 

February 23, 2011

Gene C. Howard

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

/s/ Herbert A. Bayer

 

Director

 

February 23, 2011

Herbert A. Bayer

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

/s/ Bob L. Clements

 

Director

 

February 23, 2011

Bob L. Clements

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

/s/ David B. Brown

 

Director

 

February 23, 2011

David B. Brown

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

/s/Paul R. Ferretti

 

Director

 

February 23, 2011

Paul R. Ferretti

 

 

 

 

 

62



Table of Contents

 

/s/ Phyllis K. Harding

 

Director

 

February 23, 2011

Phyllis K. Harding

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

/s/ William L. Bruggeman, Jr.

 

Director

 

February 23, 2011

William L. Bruggeman, Jr.

 

 

 

 

 

63



Table of Contents

 

PART IV

 

Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules.

 

(a) (1) and (2) Financial Statements and Financial Statement Schedules

 

See “Index to Financial Statements”.

 

(a) (3) Exhibits

 

See the Exhibit Index immediately preceding the Exhibits filed with this report.

 

64



Table of Contents

 

CUBIC ENERGY, INC.

 

INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

JUNE 30, 2010

 

 

Page

 

 

Independent Auditors’ Report

F-1

 

 

Financial Statements:

 

 

 

Balance Sheets

F-2

 

 

Statements of Operations

F-3

 

 

Statements of Changes in Shareholders’ Equity

F-4

 

 

Statements of Cash Flows

F-5

 

 

Notes to Financial Statements

F-6

Note A — Background and general

F-6

Note B — Significant accounting policies

F-6

Note C — Shareholders’ equity

F-15

Note D — Loss per common share

F-20

Note E — Long-term debt

F-20

Note F — Related party transactions

F-23

Note G — Income taxes

F-26

Note H — Commitments and contingencies

F-28

Note I — Cost of oil and gas properties

F-29

Note J — Oil and gas reserves information (unaudited)

F-30

Note K — Selected quarterly financial data (unaudited)

F-35

Note L — Subsequent events

F-35

 



Table of Contents

 

 

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS’ REPORT

 

To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of Cubic Energy, Inc.,

 

We have audited the balance sheets of Cubic Energy, Inc., a Texas corporation, as of June 30, 2010 and 2009, and the related statements of operations, of changes in stockholders’ equity and of cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended June 30, 2010. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

 

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

 

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Cubic Energy, Inc. as of June 30, 2010 and 2009, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended June 30, 2010, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

 

 

PHILIP VOGEL & CO. PC

 

 

Certified Public Accountants

 

Dallas, Texas

 

September 28, 2010, except Notes B and J (unaudited) as to which the date is February 23, 2011.

 

F-1



Table of Contents

 

CUBIC ENERGY, INC.

 

BALANCE SHEETS

JUNE 30, 2010 AND 2009

 

 

 

2010

 

2009

 

Assets

 

 

 

 

 

Current assets:

 

 

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents

 

$

391,898

 

$

71,050

 

Accounts receivable - trade

 

1,580,049

 

200,950

 

Other prepaid expenses

 

42,525

 

55,063

 

Total current assets

 

2,014,472

 

327,063

 

Property and equipment (at cost):

 

 

 

 

 

Oil and gas properties, full cost method:

 

 

 

 

 

Proved properties (including wells and related equipment and facilities)

 

14,852,010

 

15,725,709

 

Unproved properties

 

130,446

 

890,715

 

Office and other equipment

 

28,420

 

28,420

 

Oil and gas properties, and equipment, at cost

 

15,010,876

 

16,644,844

 

Less accumulated depreciation, depletion and amortization

 

6,088,038

 

4,934,973

 

Oil and gas properties, and equipment, net

 

8,922,838

 

11,709,871

 

Other assets:

 

 

 

 

 

Deferred loan costs - net

 

39,471

 

89,700

 

Drilling credit

 

27,219,160

 

 

Total other assets

 

27,258,631

 

89,700

 

 

 

$

38,195,941

 

$

12,126,634

 

Liabilities and shareholders’ equity

 

 

 

 

 

Current liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

Current portion of long term debt

 

$

 

$

26,657,390

 

Accounts payable and accrued expenses

 

3,031,300

 

299,381

 

Due to affiliates

 

419,080

 

1,192,828

 

Total current liabilities

 

3,450,380

 

28,149,599

 

Long-term liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

Long-term debt, net of discounts

 

18,983,532

 

 

Note payable to affiliate

 

2,000,000

 

 

Total long-term liabilities

 

20,983,532

 

 

Commitments and contingencies (Note H)

 

 

 

Shareholders’ equity:

 

 

 

 

 

Preferred stock - $.01 par value, authorized 10,000,000 shares;

 

 

 

 

 

Series A - 8% preferred stock,$100 stated value, redeemable at $120 covertible at $1.20 per common share, authorized 165,000 shares, 103,500 shares issued and outstanding at June 30,2010, and none issued or outstanding at June 30, 2009

 

$

1,035

 

$

 

Additional paid-in capital

 

10,348,965

 

 

Common stock - $.05 par value, authorized 120,000,000 shares, issued 75,394,579 shares at June 30, 2010 and 62,570,564 shares at June 30, 2009

 

3,769,730

 

3,128,529

 

Additional paid-in capital

 

54,032,985

 

30,062,167

 

Retained earnings’ (deficit)

 

(54,390,686

)

(49,213,661

)

Total shareholders’ equity

 

13,762,029

 

(16,022,965

)

Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity

 

$

38,195,941

 

$

12,126,634

 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.

 

F-2



Table of Contents

 

CUBIC ENERGY, INC.

 

STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

FOR THE YEARS ENDED JUNE 30, 2010, 2009, AND 2008

 

 

 

2010

 

2009

 

2008

 

Revenues:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Oil and gas sales

 

$

3,486,171

 

$

1,858,139

 

$

2,302,310

 

Total revenues

 

$

3,486,171

 

$

1,858,139

 

$

2,302,310

 

Operating costs and expenses:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Oil and gas production, operating and development costs

 

1,845,153

 

1,372,041

 

1,162,489

 

General and administrative expenses

 

2,389,073

 

1,940,025

 

2,488,133

 

Depreciation, depletion and non-loan-related amortization

 

1,153,065

 

771,861

 

2,152,096

 

Impairment loss on oil and gas properties

 

 

20,390,819

 

 

Total operating costs and expenses

 

5,387,291

 

24,474,746

 

5,802,718

 

Operating income (loss)

 

(1,901,120

)

(22,616,607

)

(3,500,408

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Non-operating income (expense):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other income

 

4,540

 

33,544

 

45,697

 

Interest expense, including amortization of loan discount

 

(4,714,386

)

(2,044,718

)

(1,579,452

)

Amortization of loan costs

 

(73,282

)

(134,735

)

(94,290

)

Total non-operating income (expense)

 

(4,783,128

)

(2,145,909

)

(1,628,045

)

Gain on debt extinguishment

 

1,747,623

 

 

 

Loss before income taxes

 

(4,936,625

)

(24,762,516

)

(5,128,453

)

Provision for income taxes

 

 

 

 

Net loss

 

$

(4,936,625

)

$

(24,762,516

)

$

(5,128,453

)

Net loss per common share - basic and diluted

 

$

(0.07

)

$

(0.40

)

$

(0.09

)

Weighted average common shares outstanding

 

67,583,793

 

61,150,400

 

56,974,407

 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.

 

F-3



Table of Contents

 

CUBIC ENERGY, INC.

 

STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

FOR THE YEARS ENDED JUNE 30, 2010, 2009, AND 2008

 

 

 

Cumulative

 

Common Stock

 

 

 

Additional

 

 

 

Total

 

 

 

Preferred Stock

 

Shares

 

Par

 

paid-in

 

Accumulated

 

stockholders’

 

 

 

outstanding

 

outstanding

 

value

 

capital

 

deficit

 

equity

 

Balance at June 30, 2007

 

 

55,840,896

 

$

2,792,046

 

$

25,325,429

 

$

(19,322,692

)

$

8,794,783

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Stock issued under compensation plan

 

 

697,500

 

34,875

 

1,046,700

 

 

1,081,575

 

Stock issued for warrant exercises

 

 

2,314,665

 

115,733

 

994,561

 

 

1,110,294

 

Other

 

 

3

 

 

 

 

 

Net loss, year ended June 30, 2008

 

 

 

 

 

(5,128,453

)

(5,128,453

)

Balance at June 30, 2008

 

 

58,853,064

 

$

2,942,654

 

$

27,366,690

 

$

(24,451,145

)

$

5,858,199

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Stock issued under compensation plan

 

 

235,000

 

11,750

 

373,650

 

 

385,400

 

Stock issued for warrant exercise

 

 

3,482,500

 

174,125

 

2,321,827

 

 

2,495,952

 

Net loss, year ended June 30, 2009

 

 

 

 

 

(24,762,516

)

(24,762,516

)

Balance, June 30, 2009

 

 

62,570,564

 

$

3,128,529

 

$

30,062,167

 

$

(49,213,661

)

$

(16,022,965

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Stock issued for working capital

 

 

2,104,001

 

105,200

 

1,683,200

 

 

1,788,400

 

Common Stock sold for property purchase

 

 

10,350,000

 

517,500

 

9,832,500

 

 

10,350,000

 

Preferred Stock sold for property purchase

 

103,500

 

 

1,035

 

10,348,965

 

 

10,350,000

 

Warrant valuations for loan extension

 

 

 

 

12,077,704

 

 

12,077,704

 

Stock issued under compensation plan

 

 

370,014

 

18,501

 

377,414

 

 

395,915

 

Preferred stock dividends

 

 

 

 

 

(240,400

)

(240,400

)

Net loss, year ended June 30, 2010

 

 

 

 

 

(4,936,625

)

(4,936,625

)

Balance at June 30, 2010

 

103,500

 

75,394,579

 

$

3,769,730

 

$

54,032,985

 

$

(54,390,686

)

$

13,762,029

 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.

 

F-4



Table of Contents

 

CUBIC ENERGY, INC.

 

STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

FOR THE YEARS ENDED JUNE 30, 2010, 2009, AND 2008

 

 

 

2010

 

2009

 

2008

 

Cash flows from operating activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net (loss)

 

$

(4,936,625

)

$

(24,762,516

)

$

(5,128,453

)

Adjustments to reconcile net (loss) to cash provided (used) by operating activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Depreciation, depletion and amortization

 

4,404,763

 

1,421,216

 

2,762,417

 

Impairment loss

 

 

20,390,819

 

 

Gain on Extinguishment of Debt

 

(1,747,623

)

 

 

Stock issued for compensation

 

395,915

 

385,400

 

1,255,437

 

Change in assets and liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(Increase) decrease in accounts receivable - trade

 

(1,379,099

)

(35,040

)

52,964

 

(Increase) decrease in other prepaid expenses

 

12,538

 

10,280

 

(7,974

)

Increase (decrease) in accounts payable and accrued liabilities

 

2,491,519

 

48,751

 

198,966

 

Increase (decrease) in due to affiliates

 

76,899

 

388,903

 

(367,186

)

Net cash (used) by operating activities

 

(681,713

)

(2,152,187

)

(1,233,829

)

Cash flows from investing activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Acquisition and development of oil and gas properties

 

(5,032,312

)

(6,001,210

)

(15,341,903

)

Increase (decrease) in capital portion of due to affiliates

 

(850,647

)

392,642

 

(856,585

)

Purchase of office equipment

 

 

(13,748

)

(1,786

)

(Increase) decrease in advances on development costs

 

 

33,399

 

687,737

 

(Increase) decrease in other assets

 

147,120

 

 

 

Net cash (used) by investing activities

 

(5,735,839

)

(5,588,917

)

(15,512,537

)

Cash flows from financing activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Issuance of common stock, net

 

1,788,400

 

2,495,952

 

1,110,295

 

Proceeds from credit facility

 

5,000,000

 

3,172,200

 

12,827,800

 

Issuance of subordinated debt

 

 

 

2,000,000

 

Loan costs incurred and other

 

(50,000

)

 

(170,000

)

Net cash provided by financing activities

 

6,738,400

 

5,668,152

 

15,768,095

 

Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents

 

$

320,848

 

$

(2,072,952

)

$

(978,271

)

Cash and cash equivalents:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Beginning of year

 

71,050

 

2,144,002

 

3,122,273

 

End of year

 

$

391,898

 

$

71,050

 

$

2,144,002

 

Other information:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash interest paid on debt

 

$

1,548,685

 

$

1,560,759

 

$

1,394,009

 

Non-cash investing and financing activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Common and preferred stock for drilling credits

 

$

20,700,000

 

$

 

$

 

Property interest assigned for drilling credits

 

$

10,252,810

 

$

 

$

 

Equity interest issued creating a deferred interest from debt modification

 

$

12,077,704

 

$

 

$

 

Preferred stock dividends accrued

 

$

240,400

 

$

 

$

 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.

 

F-5



Table of Contents

 

CUBIC ENERGY, INC.

 

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

Note A - Background and general:

 

Cubic Energy, Inc. (the “Company”) is engaged in domestic crude oil, natural gas and natural gas liquids exploration, development and production, with primary emphasis on the production of oil and gas reserves through the acquisition and development of proved, producing oil and gas properties in the states of Texas and Louisiana.

 

Note B - Significant accounting policies:

 

Cash equivalents

 

For purposes of the statements of cash flows, the Company considers all certificates of deposit and other financial instruments with original maturity dates of three months or less to be cash equivalents.

 

Accounts Receivable

 

The Company has receivables from affiliated and non-affiliated third-party operators and oil and gas purchasers that are generally uncollateralized. The Company reviews these parties for creditworthiness and general financial condition. Accounts receivable are generally due within 30 days and accounts outstanding longer than 60 days are considered past due. If necessary, the Company would determine an allowance by considering the length of time past due, previous loss history, future net revenues of the debtor’s ownership interest in oil and gas properties operated by the Company and the owners ability to pay its obligation, among other things. The Company writes off accounts receivable when they are determined to be uncollectible.

 

The Company establishes provisions for losses on accounts receivable if it determines that it will not collect all or part of the outstanding balance. The Company regularly reviews collectability and establishes or adjusts the allowance as necessary using the specific identification method. There was no allowance for doubtful accounts at June 30, 2010, 2009 and 2008.

 

Office and other equipment

 

Office and other equipment are stated at cost and depreciated by the straight-line method over estimated useful lives ranging from five to seven years. Depreciation and amortization of office and other equipment amounted to $5,193, $5,193 and $2,526 for the years ended June 30, 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively.

 

Impairment of long-lived assets and long-lived assets to be disposed of

 

The Company follows the provisions of Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 360-10, Property, Plant and Equipment — Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets which provides guidance for the financial accounting and reporting of impairment or disposal of long-lived assets.  In addition, the Company is subject to the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission with respect to impairment of oil and gas properties accounted for under the full cost method of accounting, as described below.

 

F-6



Table of Contents

 

CUBIC ENERGY, INC.

 

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

Full cost method of accounting for oil and gas properties

 

The Company has adopted the full cost method of accounting for oil and gas properties. Management believes adoption of the full cost method more accurately reflects management’s exploration objectives and results by including all costs incurred as integral for the acquisition, discovery and development of whatever reserves ultimately result from its efforts as a whole. Under the full cost method of accounting, all costs associated with acquisition, exploration and development of oil and gas reserves, including such costs as leasehold acquisition costs, interest costs related to exploratory and development activities, and directly related overhead costs, are capitalized into the full cost pool.

 

All capitalized costs of oil and gas properties, including the estimated future costs to develop proved reserves, are amortized on the unit-of-production method using estimates of proved reserves. Investments in unproved properties and major development projects are not amortized until proved reserves associated with the projects can be determined or until impairment occurs. If the results of an assessment indicate that the properties are impaired, the amount of the impairment is added to the capitalized costs to be amortized.

 

In addition, the capitalized costs are subject to a “full cost ceiling test,” which generally limits such costs to the aggregate of the “estimated present value” (discounted at a 10 percent (10%) interest rate) of future net revenues from proved reserves, based on current economic and operating conditions, plus the lower of cost or fair market value of unproved properties. Accordingly, no impairment of oil and gas properties charge was recorded for 2010, an impairment charge of $20,390,819 was recorded in fiscal 2009 and no impairment charge was recorded for fiscal 2008.

 

Sales of proved and unproved properties are accounted for as adjustments of capitalized costs with no gain or loss recognized, unless such adjustments would significantly alter the relationship between capitalized costs and proved reserves of oil and gas, in which case the gain or loss is recognized in income.

 

Depletion of producing oil and gas properties amounted to $1,147,872, $766,668 and $2,149,570 for the years ended June 30, 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively.

 

F-7



Table of Contents

 

CUBIC ENERGY, INC.

 

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

Income taxes

 

Income taxes are accounted for under the asset and liability method. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax basis. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates that will apply in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date.

 

Under ASC No. 740, Income Tax Consequences of Issuing Convertible Debt with a Beneficial Conversion Feature, or ASC No. 740, the issuance of convertible debt with a beneficial conversion feature results in a temporary difference for purposes of applying ASC No. 740. The deferred taxes recognized for the temporary difference should be recorded as an adjustment to paid-in capital. ASC No. 740 requires that the non-detachable conversion feature of a convertible debt security be accounted for separately if it is a “beneficial conversion feature.” A beneficial conversion feature is recognized and measured by allocating to additional paid-in capital a portion of the proceeds equal to the conversion feature’s intrinsic value. A discount on the convertible debt is recognized for the amount that is allocated to additional paid-in capital. The debt discount is accreted from the date of issuance to the stated redemption date of the convertible instrument or through the earliest conversion date if the instrument does not have a stated redemption date. The U.S. Internal Revenue Code includes the entire amount of proceeds received at issuance as the tax basis of the convertible debt security. ASC No. 740 requires that the Company recognize in the financial statements the impact of a tax position if that position is more likely than not of being sustained upon audit, based on the technical merits of the position. The adoption of ASC No. 740 has had no impact on the Company’s financial statements.

 

The Company is no longer subject to income tax examinations by the Internal Revenue Service for years prior to 2007.

 

Oil and gas revenues

 

The Company recognizes oil and gas revenues when oil and gas production is sold to a purchaser at a fixed or determinable price, when delivery has occurred and title has transferred, and if collectability of the revenue is probable. Delivery occurs and title is transferred when production has been delivered to a purchaser’s pipeline or truck. As a result of the numerous requirements necessary to gather information from purchasers or various measurement locations, calculate volumes produced, perform field and wellhead allocations and distribute and disburse funds to various working interest and royalty owners, the collection of revenues from oil and gas production may take up to 60 days following the month of production. Therefore, we make accruals for revenues and accounts receivable based on estimates of our share of production. Since the settlement process may take 30 to 60 days following the month of actual production, our financial results include estimates of production and revenues for the related time period. We record any differences, which historically have not been significant, between the actual amounts ultimately received and the original estimates in the period they become finalized. Differences between sales and production volumes during the years ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 increased 184% primarily due to increased number of third-party operated Haynesville Shale wells, while the difference between 2009 and 2008 were not significant.

 

F-8



Table of Contents

 

CUBIC ENERGY, INC.

 

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

Earnings (loss) per common share

 

The Company has adopted the provisions of ASC No. 260, Earnings per Share. ASC No. 260 requires the presentation of basic earnings (loss) per share (EPS) and diluted EPS. Basic EPS($0.07) is calculated by dividing net income or loss less preferred dividends (preferred dividend of $240,400) (loss available to common shareholders of $5,177,025) by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted EPS is calculated by dividing net income or loss less preferred dividends (income available to common shareholders) by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding plus any dilutive shares (i.e., preferred dividends, stock warrants or other convertible debt) during the period.

 

As discussed in Note D, there were no dilutive securities outstanding during the years ended June 30, 2010, 2009 and 2008. The weighted average number of common and common equivalent shares outstanding was 67,583,793, 61,150,400 and 56,974,407 for the years ended June 30, 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively.

 

Concentration of customers and credit risk

 

Financial instruments which potentially subject the Company to a concentration of credit risk consist primarily of trade accounts receivable with a variety of local, national, and international oil and natural gas companies. Such credit risks are considered by management to be limited due to the financial resources of the oil and natural gas companies.

 

Our revenue of $3,486,171 is partially generated by four producers with over 10% of that total. They are as follows: Goodrich totals $1,416,902 or 41%, Chesapeake totals $816,221 or 23%, EXCO totals $400,564 or 11% and NGTS totals $388,696 or 11%

 

As noted earlier the Company has receivables from non-affiliated operators for oil and gas sales.  It also has accounts payable to such operators for its share of development, production, and operating costs.  As of June 30, 2010, a single operator owed the Company approximately $811,000 which is included in accounts receivable, and the Company owed this same operator approximately $827,000, which is included in accounts payable.  Receipt and payment of these obligations will be made upon resolution of matters relating to the exact division of ownership interests among the Company and its affiliates.  Revenues attributed to this operator amounted to approximately $1,011,000 for the year ended June 30, 2010.

 

Reporting comprehensive income (loss) and operating segments

 

The Company has adopted the provisions of ASC No. 220, Comprehensive Income, and ASC No. 280, Segment Reporting. ASC No. 220 requires that an enterprise report, by major components and as a single total, the change in its net assets during the period from non-owner sources. ASC No. 280 establishes annual and interim reporting standards for an enterprise’s operating segments and related disclosures about its products, services, geographic areas and major customers. Adoption of ASC No. 220 and ASC No. 280 has had no impact on the Company’s financial position, results of operations, cash flows, or related disclosures because the Company’s operations are considered to be a single segment.

 

Use of estimates

 

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

 

F-9



Table of Contents

 

CUBIC ENERGY, INC.

 

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

Certain significant estimates

 

Management’s estimates of oil and gas reserves are based on various assumptions, including constant oil and gas prices. It is reasonably possible that a future event in the near term could cause the estimates to change and such changes could have a severe impact. Actual future production, cash flows, taxes, operating expenses, development expenditures and quantities of recoverable oil and gas reserves may vary substantially from those assumed in the estimate. The accuracy of any reserve estimate is a function of the quality of available data, engineering and geological interpretation, and judgment. Subsequent evaluation of the same reserves based upon production history will result in variations, which may be substantial, in the estimated reserves. While it is at least reasonably possible that the estimates above will change materially in the near term, no estimate can be made of the range of possible changes that might occur.

 

Fair value of financial instruments

 

The Company has adopted the provisions of ASC 825 — Financial Instruments. ASC 825 allows entities to choose, at specified election dates, to measure eligible financial assets and liabilities at fair value that are not otherwise required to be measured at fair value. If a company elects the fair value option for an eligible item, changes in that item’s fair value in subsequent reporting periods must be recognized in current earnings. ASC 825 also establishes presentation and disclosure requirements designed to draw comparison between entities that elect different measurement attributes for similar assets and liabilities.

 

The Company defines the fair value of a financial instrument as the amount at which the instrument could be exchanged in a current transaction between willing parties. Financial instruments included in the Company’s financial statements include cash and cash equivalents, short-term investments, accounts receivable, other receivables, other assets, accounts payable, notes payable and due to affiliates. Unless otherwise disclosed in the notes to the financial statements, the carrying value of financial instruments is considered to approximate fair value due to the short maturity and characteristics of those instruments. The carrying value of debt approximates fair value as terms approximate those currently available for similar debt instruments.

 

Asset retirement obligations

 

We have asset retirement obligations primarily for the future abandonment of oil and gas wells, and we maintain reserve accounts for part of these obligations under our operating agreements with sponsored drilling partnerships. We account for these obligations under ASC 410-20, Asset Retirement and Environmental Obligations, which requires the fair value of an asset retirement obligation to be recognized in the period when it is incurred if a reasonable estimate of fair value can be made. The present value of the estimated asset retirement cost is capitalized as part of the carrying amount of the underlying long-lived asset. ASC 410-20 also requires depreciation of the capitalized asset retirement cost and accretion of the asset retirement obligation over time. The depreciation is generally determined on a units-of-production basis over the life of the asset, while the accretion escalates over the life of the asset, typically as production declines. The amounts recognized are based on numerous estimates and assumptions, including recoverable quantities of oil and gas, future retirement and site reclamation costs, inflation rates and credit-adjusted risk-free interest rates.

 

F-10



Table of Contents

 

CUBIC ENERGY, INC.

 

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

Stock-based compensation

 

The Company accounts for its stock-based employee compensation plans pursuant to ASC 718 Compensation — Stock Compensation. ASC 718 requires the Company to recognize compensation costs related to stock-based payment transactions (i.e., the granting of stock options and warrants, and awards of shares of common stock) in the financial statements. With limited exceptions, the amount of compensation is measured based on the grant-date fair value of the equity issued. Compensation cost is recognized over the period that an employee provides services in exchange for the award.

 

Exit or disposal activities

 

The Company has adopted the provisions of ASC 420, Exit or Disposal Cost Obligations. ASC 420 requires companies to recognize costs associated with exit or disposal activities when they are incurred rather than at the date of a commitment to an exit or disposal plan. Examples of costs covered by the standard include lease termination costs and certain employee severance costs that are associated with a restructuring, discontinued operations, or other exit or disposal activities. No exit or disposal activities have been entered into by the Company.

 

Financial instruments with characteristics of both liabilities and equity

 

The Company has adopted the provisions of ASC 480 — Distinguishing Liabilities from Equity. ASC 480 established standards for how a company classifies and measures certain financial instruments with characteristics of both liabilities and equity. The statement requires that a company classify a financial instrument that is within its scope as a liability (or an asset in some circumstances) if certain criteria are met. Freestanding financial instruments that obligate the issuer to redeem the holder’s shares, or are indexed to such an obligation, and are settled in cash or settled with shares meeting certain conditions would be treated as liabilities. Many of those instruments were previously classified as equity.

 

ASC 480-10-05 clarifies that freestanding warrants and similar instruments on shares that are redeemable should be accounted for as liabilities under ASC 480 regardless of the timing of the redemption feature or price, even though the underlying shares may be classified as equity. Although the Company had outstanding warrants as of June 30, 2010, the shares issuable upon exercise of the warrants are not redeemable; consequently, adoption of ASC 480 has not had an impact on the Company’s financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

 

Guarantee of debt

 

The Company has adopted the provisions of ASC 460 — Guarantees. ASC 460 clarifies that a guarantor is required to recognize, at the inception of certain types of guarantees, a liability for the fair value of the obligation undertaken in issuing the guarantee, and requires additional disclosures on existing guarantees even if the likelihood of future liability under the guarantees is deemed remote. The Company has not issued any guarantees and, therefore, the adoption of ASC 460 has not had any impact on the Company’s financial statements.

 

F-11



Table of Contents

 

CUBIC ENERGY, INC.

 

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

Accounting changes and error corrections

 

The Company has adopted the provisions of ASC 250 — Accounting Changes and Error Corrections. ASC 250 applies to all voluntary changes in accounting principles and changes required by an accounting pronouncement in the unusual instance that the pronouncement does not include specific transition provisions. Under previous guidance, changes in accounting principle were recognized as a cumulative effect in the net income of the period of the change. ASC 250 requires retrospective application of changes in accounting principle, limited to the direct effects of the change, to prior periods’ financial statements, unless it is impracticable to determine either the period-specific effects or the cumulative effect of the change in accounting principle. The adoption of ASC 250 did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

 

Debt modifications

 

The Company has adopted the provisions of ASC 470 — Debt Modifications and Extinguishment. ASC 470 requires an issuer that modifies a debt instrument to compare the present value of the original debt instrument’s cash flows to the present value of the cash flows of the modified debt. If the present value of those cash flows varies by more than 10 percent (10%), the modification is considered significant and extinguishments accounting is applied to the original debt. If the change in the present value of the cash flows is less than 10 percent (10%), the debt is considered to be modified and is subject to ASC 470 modification accounting. ASC 470 requires that in applying the 10 percent (10%) test the change in the fair value of the conversion option be treated in the same manner as a current period cash flow. ASC 470 also requires that, if a modification does not result in an extinguishment, the change in fair value of the conversion option be accounted for as an adjustment to interest expense over the remaining term of the debt. The issuer should not recognize a beneficial conversion feature or reassess an existing beneficial conversion feature upon modification of the conversion option of a debt instrument that does not result in an extinguishment. The adoption of ASC 470 did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

 

F-12



Table of Contents

 

CUBIC ENERGY, INC.

 

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

Certain hybrid financial instruments

 

The Company has adopted the provisions of ASC 815 — Derivatives and Hedging. ASC 815 improves the financial reporting of certain hybrid financial instruments by requiring more consistent accounting that eliminates exemptions and provides a means to simplify the accounting for these instruments. Specifically, ASC 815 allows financial instruments that have embedded derivatives to be accounted for as a whole (eliminating the need to bifurcate the derivative from its host) if the holder elects to account for the whole instrument on a fair value basis. The adoption of ASC 815 did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

 

Reporting taxes collected

 

The Company has adopted the provisions of ASC 605 — Taxes Collected from Customers and Remitted to Governmental Authorities. Taxes collected should be presented in the income statement (gross versus net presentation). ASC 605 addresses income statement classification and disclosure requirements of externally-imposed taxes on revenue-producing transactions. The adoption of ASC 605 did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

 

Subsequent Events

 

The Company has adopted the provisions of ASC 855 — Subsequent Events. ASC 855 establishes general standards of accounting for and disclosure of events that occur after the balance sheet date but before financial statements are issued or are available to be issued. ASC 855 sets forth (1) the period after the balance sheet date during which management of a reporting entity should evaluate events or transactions that may occur for potential recognition or disclosure in the financial statements, (2) the circumstances under which an entity should recognize events or transactions occurring after the balance sheet date in its financial statements and (3) the disclosures that an entity should make about events or transactions that occurred after the balance sheet date. The adoption of ASC 855 did not have a material effect on the Company’s financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

 

F-13



Table of Contents

 

CUBIC ENERGY, INC.

 

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

Other recent accounting pronouncements

 

In February 2010, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) 2010-09, Amendments to Certain Recognition and Disclosure Requirements, amending its guidance on subsequent events under ASC 855 to remove the requirement for SEC filers to disclose the date through which events or transactions occurring after the balance sheet date have been evaluated for potential recognition or disclosure. The ASU will be effective for the first reporting period after its issuance. ASC 855 became effective in June 2009, and its adoption did not affect our practices for evaluating, recording or disclosing subsequent events.

 

In January 2010, the FASB issued ASU — 2010-03, Extractive Industries—Oil and Gas (Topic 932) — Oil and Gas Reserve Estimation and Disclosures. This ASU aligns industry-specific accounting standards for oil and gas producing activities with revised oil and gas reserve estimation and disclosure rules adopted by the SEC at the end of 2008 and subsequently consolidated in Subpart 1200 of Regulation S-K and amendments to Rule 4-10 of Regulation S-X under the Exchange Act. We adopted the revised standards and reserve reporting rules on December 31, 2009.

 

In August 2009, the FASB issued ASU 2009-05, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures — Measuring Liabilities at Fair Value, which provides clarification for the fair value measurement of liabilities, effective for the first reporting period after issuance. Our adoption of this update did not have a significant impact on our financial position, results of operations, cash flows or disclosures.

 

ASC 105, Generally Accepted Accounting Principles was issued by the FASB in July 2009 to establish the Codification as the single source of authoritative nongovernmental GAAP, except for SEC rules and interpretive releases. Under ASC 105, the Codification became effective for reporting periods ended after September 15, 2009. The Codification did not change existing GAAP, and adoption of ASC 105 did not have any impact on our consolidated financial statements.

 

F-14



Table of Contents

 

CUBIC ENERGY, INC.

 

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

Note C — Stockholders’ equity:

 

The Company’s authorized capital is 120,000,000 shares of $0.05 par value common stock and 10,000,000 shares of $0.01 par value preferred stock. 103,500 shares of preferred stock were issued and outstanding at June 30, 2010 and no shares of preferred stock were issued or outstanding at June 30, 2009.

 

Stock and warrants

 

On December 16, 2005, the Company entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement and issued 2,500,000 common shares at a price of $0.80 per share and issued warrants, with five year expirations, for the purchase of up to 1,000,000 shares of Company common stock at an exercise price of $1.00 per share. The proceeds of the offering were used for exploratory drilling and working capital. 897,500 of the above-referenced warrants had been exercised and 385,834 remain outstanding at June 30, 2010.

 

On February 6, 2006, Cubic entered into a Credit Agreement with Petro Capital V, L.P. (“Petro Capital”) pursuant to which Petro Capital advanced to the Company $5,500,000. In connection with the funding under the Credit Agreement, the Company issued to Petro Capital and Petro Capital Securities, LLC, warrants, with five-year expirations, for the purchase of up to 1,833,334 and 250,000 shares, respectively, of Company common stock at an exercise price of $1.00 per share. Pursuant to the anti-dilution adjustment provisions applicable to such warrants, the exercise price applicable to all such warrants still outstanding is currently $0.9651 per share. 1,550,000 of the above-referenced warrants issued to Petro Capital had been exercised and 283,334 remained outstanding at June 30, 2010. None of the 250,000 warrants issued to Petro Capital Securities, LLC had been exercised and all remained outstanding at June 30, 2009. The Company allocated the proceeds from the issuance of the senior debt to the warrants and the senior debt based on their relative fair market values at the date of issuance. The value assigned to the warrants of $1,203,752 was recorded as an increase in additional paid-in capital.

 

On July 28, 2006, Cubic entered into and consummated transactions pursuant to Subscription and Registration Rights Agreements (the “July 2006 Subscription Agreements”) with certain investors that are unaffiliated with the Company. Pursuant to the Subscription Agreements, the investors paid aggregate consideration of $2,100,000 to the Company for 3,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock and warrants exercisable, through July 31, 2011, into 1,500,000 shares of common stock at $0.70 per share. Pursuant to the anti-dilution adjustment provisions applicable to such warrants, the exercise price applicable to all such warrants is currently $0.6849 per share. 1,125,000 of the above-referenced warrants had been exercised and 375,000 remain outstanding at June 30, 2010.

 

On November 10, 2006, in connection with the extension of a promissory note, the Company issued to Tauren warrants, with three-year expirations, for the purchase of up to 50,000 shares of Company common stock at an exercise price of $0.70 per share. The above-referenced warrants expired on November 10, 2009.

 

On December 15, 2006, the Company entered into Subscription and Registration Rights Agreements (the “December 2006 Subscription Agreements”) with certain investors. One of the investors, William Bruggeman (and entities affiliated with him) was the beneficial owner, prior to this transaction, of approximately 23.0% of the common stock of the Company. In this transaction, Mr. Bruggeman (and entities affiliated with him) purchased an aggregate of 4,288,000 shares of common stock at a purchase price of $0.50 per share, or an aggregate of $2,144,000. Mr. Bruggeman (and entities affiliated with him) received warrants to purchase 2,144,000 shares of common stock with an exercise price of $0.70 per share.

 

F-15



Table of Contents

 

CUBIC ENERGY, INC.

 

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

Another investor, Bob Clements, a director of the Company, purchased 100,000 shares of common stock at a purchase price of $0.50 per share, or an aggregate of $50,000. Mr. Clements received warrants to purchase 50,000 shares of common stock with an exercise price of $0.70 per share. Pursuant to the December 2006 Subscription Agreements, the investors paid aggregate consideration of $3,940,000 to the Company for 7,880,000 shares of the Company’s common stock and warrants exercisable into 3,940,000 shares of common stock. The warrants are exercisable through November 30, 2011, at $0.6963 per share. 2,240,000 of the above-referenced warrants have been exercised and 1,700,000 remained outstanding at June 30, 2010.

 

On March 5, 2007, Cubic entered into a Credit Agreement with Wells Fargo Energy Capital (“Wells Fargo”) providing for a revolving credit facility of $20,000,000 and a convertible term loan of $5,000,000 (the “Credit Facility”). In connection with entering into the Credit Facility, the Company issued to Wells Fargo warrants, with five-year expirations, for the purchase of up to 2,500,000 shares of Company common stock at an exercise price of $0.9911 per share. The term loan is also convertible into 5,044,900 shares of Company common stock at a conversion price of $0.9911 per share. None of the above-referenced warrants had been exercised and all remained outstanding at June 30, 2010. The Company allocated the proceeds from the issuance of the debt to the warrants, the debt and net profits interest (see “Note E — Long-term debt”) based on their relative fair market values at the date of issuance. The value assigned to the warrants of $1,314,289 was recorded as an increase in additional paid-in capital and the value assigned to the net profits interest of $213,148 was recorded as a credit to the full cost pool for oil and gas properties.

 

During the fiscal year ended June 30, 2008, the Company received an aggregate total of $1,110,295 relating to the exercise of 2,730,000 warrants representing 2,314,665 shares of common stock.

 

Through the following exercises of warrants, we issued an aggregate of 3,482,500 shares of common stock, which were not registered under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, during fiscal 2009:

 

On July 3, 2008, two warrant holders of the Company exercised warrants for an aggregate of 1,127,500 shares of Company common stock, through the payment of $777,002 to the Company.

 

On July 7, 2008, one warrant holder of the Company exercised warrants for 250,000 shares of Company common stock, through the payment of $243,950 to the Company.

 

On July 8, 2008, one warrant holder of the Company exercised warrants for 100,000 shares of Company common stock, through the payment of $70,000 to the Company.

 

On July 17, 2008, one warrant holder of the Company exercised warrants for 5,000 shares of Company common stock, through the payment of $5,000 to the Company.

 

On February 23, 2009, twenty-two warrant holders of the Company exercised warrants for 2,000,000 shares of Company common stock, through the payment of $1,400,000 to the Company. Included among these warrant holders were the following 5% beneficial owners: William L. Bruggeman, Jr. and Ruth J. Bruggeman JWROS exercised warrants for 1,544,000 shares and Steven S. Bruggeman exercised warrants for 24,000 shares.

 

Aggregate proceeds to the Company of the aforementioned stock issuances were $2,495,952, all of which have been used for working capital purposes.

 

F-16



Table of Contents

 

CUBIC ENERGY, INC.

 

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

In connection with the following common stock issuances, the Company entered into Subscription and Registration Rights Agreements (“Subscription Agreements”) with certain investors. Pursuant to the Subscription Agreements, the Company issued an aggregate of 2,104,001 shares of common stock and warrants exercisable into 1,052,000 shares of common stock. On August 18, 2009, four investors acquired 804,000 shares of common stock and warrants exercisable into 402,000 shares of common stock, through the payment of $683,400. On August 26, 2009, six investors acquired 1,300,001 shares of common stock and warrants exercisable into 650,000 shares of common stock, through the payment of $1,105,001. The warrants are exercisable through July 31, 2014, at $0.85 per share. With respect to certain of such issuances, the Company paid broker-dealer commissions in the aggregate amount of $59,500 to Avalon Group, Ltd. The aggregate consideration, net of commissions, from such issuances has been used for working capital purposes.

 

As consideration for the Drilling Credits, the Company (a) conveyed to Tauren a net overriding royalty interest of approximately 2% in its leasehold rights below the Taylor Sand formation of the Cotton Valley and (b) on March 16, 2010 issued to Langtry 10,350,000 Company common shares and preferred stock with a stated value of $10,350,000, convertible into Company common shares at $1.20 per common share, with a five year conversion term. The preferred stock is entitled to cumulative dividends equal to 8% per annum, payable quarterly, which dividends may be paid in cash or in additional shares of preferred stock, in the Company’s discretion. The preferred stock may be redeemed by the Company at any time, at a redemption price equal to 20% over the original issue price, plus accrued and unpaid dividends.

 

The aforementioned issuances were made in reliance upon an exemption from registration set forth in Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1993, as amended, which exempts transactions by an issuer not involving a public offering.

 

Stock-based compensation

 

On December 29, 2005, the shareholders of the Company approved the 2005 Stock Option Plan (the “Plan”) and 3,750,000 shares of common stock were reserved, of which 3,013,514 shares had been issued through June 30, 2010. At the 2010 Annual Shareholder Meeting shareholders approved an increase in the number if shares under the Plan by 2,000,000 shares. Total shares available under the Plan are 2,736,486 as of June 30, 2010.

 

On January 10 and January 18, 2007, the Company issued 489,500 and 52,500 shares, respectively, to the officers, directors, and key employees of the Company pursuant to the Plan. As of such dates, the aggregate market value of the common stock granted was $391,600 and $42,000, respectively, based on the last sale price on the OTCBB of the Company’s common stock. Such amounts were amortized to compensation expense on a quarterly basis during calendar year 2007. Accordingly, $186,800 was recorded as compensation expense and included in general and administrative expense for the fiscal years ended June 30, 2008. The following executive officers received the following grants: (i) 150,000 shares to Calvin A. Wallen, III, and (ii) 47,500 shares to Jon S. Ross.

 

On August 20, 2007, the Company issued 90,000 shares to the former Chief Financial Officer of the Company pursuant to the Plan, with such grant subject to vesting in quarterly installments over the following four quarters. As of such date, the aggregate market value of the common stock

 

F-17



Table of Contents

 

CUBIC ENERGY, INC.

 

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

granted was $103,500 based on the then market price on the OTCBB of the Company’s common stock. Such amount is being amortized to compensation expense on a quarterly basis during fiscal years 2008 and 2009. Accordingly, $90,563 was recorded as compensation expense and included in general and administrative expenses for fiscal 2008. The remaining $12,938 was amortized to compensation expense in the first quarter of fiscal 2009, which ends September 30, 2008.

 

On January 31 and February 4, 2008, the Company issued 555,000 and 52,500 shares, respectively, to the officers and directors, and key employees of the Company pursuant to the Plan. As of such dates, the aggregate market value of the common stock granted was $893,550 and $84,525, respectively (a total of $978,075), based on the then-market price on the OTCBB of the Company’s common stock. Recent SEC guidance requires that immediately-vesting common stock grants with no forfeiture provisions be expensed at the time of grant rather than amortized over four quarters. Accordingly, the full $978,075 was recorded as compensation expense and included in general and administrative expenses for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2008.

 

On January 12, 2009, the Company issued 235,000 shares to three directors of the Company pursuant to the Plan.  As of such dates, the aggregate market value of the common stock granted was $385,400 based on the last sale price ($1.64 per share) on the aforementioned date, on the NYSE — Amex of the Company’s common stock. Such amounts were expensed upon issuance to compensation expense.

 

On February 3, 2010, the Company issued 370,014 shares to five directors of the Company pursuant to the Plan.  As of such dates, the aggregate market value of the common stock granted was $395,915 based on the last sale price ($1.07 per share) on the aforementioned date, on the NYSE — Amex of the Company’s common stock. Such amounts were expensed upon issuance to compensation expense.

 

All of the foregoing issuances and grants were made in reliance upon an exemption from registration set forth in Regulation D and/or Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, which exempts transactions by an issuer not involving a public offering.

 

F-18



Table of Contents

 

CUBIC ENERGY, INC.

 

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

The following table provides information related to stock-based compensation for the years ended June 30, 2010, 2009 and 2008:

 

 

 

Fiscal Year Ended June 30,

 

 

 

2010

 

2009

 

2008

 

Officer and employee restricted stock grants:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Pretax compensation expense

 

$

 

$

12,938

 

$

818,287

 

Tax benefit

 

$

 

$

 

$

 

Restricted stock expense, net of tax

 

$

 

$

12,938

 

$

818,287

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Director restricted stock grants:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Pretax compensation expense

 

$

395,915

 

$

385,400

 

$

437,150

 

Tax benefit

 

$

 

$

 

$

 

Director stock grants expense, net of tax

 

$

395,915

 

$

385,400

 

$

437,150

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Stock options:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Pretax compensation expense

 

$

 

$

 

$

 

Tax benefit

 

$

 

$

 

$

 

Stock option expense, net of tax

 

$

 

$

 

$

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total stock-based compensation:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Pretax compensation expense

 

$

395,915

 

$

398,338

 

$

1,255,437

 

Tax benefit

 

$

 

$

 

$

 

Total share based compensation expense, net of tax

 

$

395,915

 

$

398,338

 

$

1,255,437

 

 

F-19



Table of Contents

 

CUBIC ENERGY, INC.

 

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

Note D — Loss per common share:

 

 

 

2010

 

2009

 

2008

 

Net loss attributable to stockholders

 

$

(4,936,625

)

$

(24,762,516

)

$

(5,128,453

)

Weighted average number of shares of common stock

 

67,583,793

 

61,150,400

 

56,974,407

 

Income (loss) per common share

 

$

(0.07

)

$

(0.40

)

$

(0.09

)

 

Potential dilutive securities (e.g., convertible preferred stock, stock warrants and convertible debt) have not been considered because the Company reported a net loss and, accordingly, their effects would be anti-dilutive.

 

Note E — Long-term debt:

 

March 2007 debt issue

 

On March 5, 2007, Cubic entered into a Credit Agreement with Wells Fargo Energy Capital, Inc. (“Wells Fargo”) providing for a revolving credit facility of $20,000,000 (the “Revolving Note”) and a convertible term loan of $5,000,000 (the “Term Loan”; and together with the Revolving Note, the “Credit Facility”). The indebtedness bore interest at a fluctuating rate equal to the sum of the Wells Fargo Bank prime rate plus two percent (2%) per annum, was originally scheduled to mature on March 1, 2010, and was secured by substantially all of the assets of the Company.

 

The Term Loan of $5,000,000 is convertible into 5,000,000 shares of Cubic common stock, currently at a conversion price of $0.9911 per share. Approximately $5,000,000 of the funded amount was used, together with cash on hand, to retire the Company’s previously outstanding senior debt that was due February 6, 2009.

 

In connection with entering into the Credit Facility, the Company issued to Wells Fargo warrants, with five-year expirations, for the purchase of up to 2,500,000 shares of Company common stock at an exercise price of $1.00 per share.

 

The Company allocated the proceeds from the issuance of the debt to the warrants, the debt and net profits interest in the future production of hydrocarbons from or attributable to Cubic’s net interest in its Louisiana properties, which net profits interest was granted to Wells Fargo, based on their relative fair market values at the date of issuance. The value assigned to the warrants of $1,314,289 was recorded as an increase in additional paid-in capital and the value assigned to the net profits interest of $213,148 was recorded as a credit to the full cost pool for oil and gas properties. The assignment of a value to the warrants and net profits interest resulted in a loan discount being recorded. The discount amortization is over the original three-year term of the debt as additional interest expense.  Amortization for the years ended June 30, 2010, 2009 and 2008 was $239,686, $514,620 and $516,030, respectively.

 

Cubic incurred loan costs of $240,613 on the issuance of the debt and warrants. The amount allocable to the debt of $166,590 has been capitalized and is being amortized over the term of the debt. Amortization for the years ended June 30, 2010, 2009 and 2008 was $25,958, $55,733 and $55,886 respectively. Cubic also incurred commitment fees of $170,000 related to subsequent

 

F-20



Table of Contents

 

CUBIC ENERGY, INC.

 

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

increases in the Credit Facility’s borrowing base; such amount was capitalized in fiscal 2008 and is being amortized over the remaining term of the loan.  Amortization for the years ended June 30, 2010, 2009 and 2008 was $36,795, $79,001 and $38,404 respectively.

 

On December 18, 2009, the Company entered into a Second Amendment to Credit Agreement with Wells Fargo, providing for a revolving credit facility of up to $40 million and a convertible term loan of $5 million (the “Amended Credit Agreement”). The borrowing base under the revolving credit facility was initially established at $25 million. The indebtedness bears interest at a fluctuating rate equal to the sum of the Wells Fargo Bank prime rate plus two percent (2%) per annum, matures on July 1, 2012 and is secured by substantially all of the assets of the Company. In connection with entering into the Amended Credit Agreement, the Company issued to Wells Fargo additional warrants, expiring on December 1, 2014, for the purchase of up to 5,000,000 shares of Company common stock currently at an exercise price of $0.9911 per share, and extended the expiration date of the warrants to purchase 2,500,000 shares of Company common stock that were previously issued to Wells Fargo to December 1, 2014.

 

The Company allocated the proceeds from the issuance of the debt to the warrants, the debt and the beneficial conversion feature based on their fair market values at the date of issuance. The fair market value assigned to the extension of warrants to purchase 2,500,000 shares of Company common stock was $923,302 and the value assigned to the issuance of the warrant to purchase the additional 5,000,000 shares of Company common stock was $8,031,896, which was recorded as an increase in additional paid-in capital. The difference in the fair value of the term loan and the face amount of $1,877,494 was recorded as an extinguishment of debt, offset by the amount of unamortized deferred loan cost and discounts associated with the original debt of $129,871.  The beneficial conversion feature equaled $5,027,494, which was reduced to $3,122,506 based on the limitation to the fair value to debt. The assignment of a value to the warrants and beneficial conversion feature as well as the write-down of the term loan to the fair value resulted in a total loan discount in the amount of $13,955,198 being recorded. The discount is being amortized over the three-year term of the debt as additional interest expense. Amortization was $2,938,730 for the year ended June 30, 2010.  Amortization for the fiscal years ending June 30, 2011 and 2012 is expected to be approximately $5,500,699 and $5,515,769, respectively.

 

In connection with the modification of the indebtedness, the Company recorded a gain on extinguishment of debt of $1,747,623.  Such amount includes the write-off of the unamortized deferred loan cost ($26,947), and the write-off of the remaining loan discount ($102,924).

 

Cubic incurred loan costs of $50,000 on the issuance of the debt and warrants. The amount was capitalized and allocated to the debt and is being amortized over the term of the debt. Amortization was $10,529 for the year ended June 30, 2010. Amortization for the fiscal years ending June 30, 2011 and 2012 is expected to be approximately $19,708 and $19,762, respectively.

 

May 2008 subordinated debt issue

 

On May 6, 2008, the Company issued a subordinated promissory note in the amount of $2,000,000 (the “Subordinated Note”) to Diversified Dynamics Corporation (the “Lender”), an entity controlled by William Bruggeman, a director who beneficially owns more than 5% of the common stock of the Company. The Subordinated Note bore interest at a fluctuating rate equal to the sum of the prime rate plus two percent (2%) per annum, and was scheduled to mature on April 30, 2010. As consideration for the loan made by the Lender pursuant to the Subordinated Note, the Company agreed to convey to the

 

F-21



Table of Contents

 

CUBIC ENERGY, INC.

 

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

Lender, upon the repayment in full of the indebtedness evidenced by the Subordinated Note and the repayment in full of the senior indebtedness evidenced by the Credit Facility with Wells Fargo, an undivided 0.375% net profits interest in the future production of hydrocarbons from or attributable to Cubic’s net interest in its Louisiana properties. The proceeds of the Subordinated Note were used for general corporate and working capital purposes.

 

Issuing the Subordinated Note required the consent of Wells Fargo, which consent it granted on May 5, 2008. Subsequently, on May 8, 2008, the Credit Facility with Wells Fargo was amended by the First Amendment to Credit Agreement (the “First Amendment”). Material provisions of the First Amendment included the following: (i) the Company may not prepay all or any part of the principal balance outstanding on the Term Loan prior to its maturity on July 1, 2012 without the consent of Wells Fargo; and (ii) the amount of the borrowing base was increased to $20,000,000, which amount was fully drawn upon subsequent to the end of fiscal 2008, on August 20, 2008.

 

On December 18, 2009, the Company issued a subordinated promissory note payable to Calvin A. Wallen, III, the Company’s Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer, in the principal amount of $2,000,000 (the “Wallen Note”). This note bears interest at the prime rate plus one percent (1%), with interest payable monthly. The Wallen Note was entered into with the consent of Wells Fargo. The outstanding principal balance is due and payable on September 30, 2012 and is subordinated to the indebtedness under the Amended Credit Agreement. The proceeds of the Wallen Note were used to repay the Subordinated Note. The net profits interest described above was conveyed to the Lender in connection with the repayment.

 

 

 

as of June 30,

 

Principal Amount Outstanding 

 

2010

 

2009

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total long-term debt (including current portion)

 

$

32,000,000

 

$

27,000,000

 

Less current portion

 

0

 

27,000,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total long-term debt

 

$

32,000,000

 

$

0

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Maturities of Debt

 

 

 

 

 

2010

 

$

0

 

 

 

2011

 

0

 

 

 

2012

 

0

 

 

 

2013

 

32,000,000

 

 

 

2014 and thereafter

 

0

 

 

 

 

F-22



Table of Contents

 

CUBIC ENERGY, INC.

 

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

Note F — Related party transactions:

 

Effective January 1, 2002, the Company entered into an agreement with Tauren Exploration, Inc., an entity controlled by Cubic’s Chairman of the Board, President and CEO that provides for the following:

 

1) As of January 1, 2002, the Company owed Tauren $856,712, primarily comprised of non-interest bearing advances the Company had received over the course of several years. In exchange for the amounts owed to it, Tauren accepted the transfer of 856,712 newly issued and shares of common stock in the Company that had a market price of $0.70 per share.

 

2) The Company received the rights to participate in prospective oil and gas projects in which Tauren owns a working interest.

 

3) The Company shall, as requested, have the future privilege of using the general and administrative services of Tauren based on an agreed pro rata cost.

 

4) The Company issued three series of warrants to Tauren as described in Note C.

 

On December 1, 1997, as renewed and revised on January 1, 2002, the Company entered into a contract with Tauren to provide the necessary technical, administrative and management expertise needed to conduct its business. Tauren also paid various organization costs and consulting fees on behalf of the Company. The monthly amount charged to the Company was based on actual costs of materials and labor hours of Tauren that were used pursuant to the terms of the agreement. The agreement was terminated effective January 1, 2006, except as to the office sharing provisions, which were extended to June 30, 2007 and since continue on a month to month basis. The Company now has 11 employees and its offices are leased from Tauren. During fiscal 2010, the Company’s only expense under the office sharing arrangement was the rent lease. Charges to the Company under the contracts and subsequent arrangements were $26,748, $26,748 and $26,748 for the years ended June 30, 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively.

 

Tauren owns a working interest in the wells in which the Company owns a working interest. As of June 30, 2010, the Company owed $78,679 to Tauren for miscellaneous general and administrative expenses paid by Tauren on the Company’s behalf; as of June 30, 2009 and 2008 the Company was owed $649,205 and $942 respectively, to Tauren for miscellaneous general and administrative expenses paid by the Company on Tauren’s behalf.

 

In addition, 22 wells in which the Company owns a working interest are operated by an affiliated company, Fossil Operating, Inc. (“Fossil”), which is owned 100% by the Company’s President and Chief Executive Officer, Calvin A. Wallen III. As of June 30, 2010, 2009 and 2008, the Company owed Fossil $755,683, $815,239 and $862,895, respectively, for drilling costs and lease and operating expenses, and was owed by Fossil $415,282, $271,615 and $450,669, respectively, for oil and gas sales.

 

On February 6, 2006, the Company entered into a Purchase Agreement with Tauren with respect to the purchase by the Company of certain Cotton Valley leasehold interests (approximately 11,000 gross acres; 5,000 net acres) held by Tauren. Pursuant to the Purchase Agreement, the Company acquired from Tauren a 35% working interest in approximately 2,400 acres and a 49% working interest in approximately 8,500 acres located in DeSoto and Caddo Parishes, Louisiana, along with an associated Area of Mutual Interest (“AMI”) and the right

 

F-23



Table of Contents

 

CUBIC ENERGY, INC.

 

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

to acquire at “cost” (as defined in the Purchase Agreement) a seventy percent (70%) working interest in all additional mineral leases obtained by Tauren in the AMI, in exchange for (a) $3,500,000 in cash, (b) 2,500,000 shares of Company common stock, (c) an unsecured 12.5% promissory note in the amount of $1,300,000, which note was convertible into Company common stock at a conversion price of $0.80 per share (the “Tauren Note”), and (d) a drilling credit of $2,100,000. The Tauren Note was repaid on February 2, 2007.

 

The consideration described above was determined based upon negotiations between Tauren and a Special Committee of the Company’s directors, excluding Mr. Wallen. The Special Committee obtained an opinion from its independent financial advisor with respect to the fairness, from a financial point of view, to the public stockholders of the Company, of such transactions.

 

On November 10, 2006, the maturity of the Tauren Note was extended to October 5, 2007. In connection with the extension of the Tauren Note, the Company issued to Tauren warrants, with three-year expirations, for the purchase of up to 50,000 shares of Company common stock at an exercise price of $0.70 per share.

 

On February 2, 2007, the Tauren Note was retired pursuant to a provision in the note that required payment from the proceeds of an equity offering. The equity offering that occurred in December 2006 (see “Note C — Stockholders’ Equity”) was sufficient to facilitate such repayment.

 

On May 6, 2008, the Company issued a subordinated promissory note in the amount of $2,000,000 to Diversified Dynamics Corporation, an entity controlled by William Bruggeman who, at the time of such transaction, was the beneficial owner of approximately 28.9% of the common stock of the Company. See “May 2008 subordinated debt issue” in “Note E — Long-term debt” elsewhere herein.

 

On November 24, 2009, the Company entered into transactions with Tauren and Langtry Mineral & Development, LLC (“Langtry”), both of which are entities controlled by Calvin Wallen III, the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, under which the Company acquired $30,952,810 in pre-paid drilling credits (the “Drilling Credits”) applicable towards the development of its Haynesville Shale rights in Northwest Louisiana. The Company expects to use the Drilling Credits to fund $30,952,810 of its share of the drilling and completion costs for those horizontal Haynesville Shale wells drilled in sections previously operated by an affiliate of the Company, which are now operated by a third party. Any Drilling Credits not utilized by 2013 will be paid to Cubic, on a dollar for dollar basis.

 

As consideration for the Drilling Credits, the Company (a) conveyed to Tauren a net overriding royalty interest of approximately 2% in its leasehold rights below the Taylor Sand formation of the Cotton Valley and (b) on March 16, 2010 issued to Langtry 10,350,000 Company common shares and preferred stock with a stated value of $10,350,000, convertible into Company common shares at $1.20 per common share, with a five year conversion term. The preferred stock is entitled to cumulative dividends equal to 8% per annum, payable quarterly, which dividends may be paid in cash or in additional shares of preferred stock, in the Company’s discretion. The preferred stock may be redeemed by the Company at any time, at a redemption price equal to 20% over the original issue price, plus accrued and unpaid dividends.

 

This transaction resulted in a reduction in the Company’s oil and gas properties recorded cost in the amount of $10,252,810.

 

F-24



Table of Contents

 

CUBIC ENERGY, INC.

 

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

The consideration described above was determined based upon negotiations between Tauren and a Special Committee of the Company’s directors, excluding Mr. Wallen. The Special Committee obtained an opinion from its independent financial advisor with respect to the fairness, from a financial point of view, to the public stockholders of the Company, of such transactions.

 

On December 18, 2009, the Company issued a subordinated promissory note payable to Mr. Wallen, in the principal amount of $2,000,000 (the “Wallen Note”). This note bears interest at the prime rate plus one percent (1%), with interest payable monthly. The Wallen Note was entered into with the consent of Wells Fargo. The outstanding principal balance is due and payable on August 31, 2012 and is subordinated to the indebtedness under the Amended Credit Agreement. The proceeds of the Wallen Note were used to repay the Subordinated Note. The net profits interest described above was conveyed to the Lender in connection with the repayment.

 

F-25



Table of Contents

 

CUBIC ENERGY, INC.

 

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

Note G — Income taxes:

 

Deferred tax assets and liabilities are computed by applying the effective U.S. federal income tax rate to the gross amounts of temporary differences and other tax attributes. Deferred tax assets and liabilities relating to state income taxes are not material. In assessing the realizability of deferred tax assets, management considers whether it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. The ultimate realization of deferred tax assets is dependent upon the generation of future taxable income during the periods in which those temporary differences become deductible. Management considers the scheduled reversal of deferred tax liabilities, projected future taxable income, and tax planning strategies in making this assessment. As of June 30, 2010, 2009 and 2008, the Company believed it was more likely than not that future tax benefits from net operating loss carryforwards and other deferred tax assets would not be realizable through generation of future taxable income; therefore, they were fully reserved.

 

The components of the net deferred federal income tax assets (liabilities) at June 30 were as follows:

 

 

 

2010

 

2009

 

2008

 

Deferred tax assets:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net operating loss carryforwards

 

$

5,309,100

 

$

10,579,700

 

$

7,914,000

 

Depletion basis of assets and related accounts

 

1,842,900

 

2,309,800

 

311,000

 

Depletion basis of assets

 

1,300

 

 

 

 

 

$

7,153,300

 

$

12,889,500

 

$

8,225,000

 

Deferred tax liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Depletion basis of assets

 

$

 

$

(1,200

)

$

 

 

 

$

 

$

(1,200

)

$

 

Net deferred tax (liabilities) assets before valuation allowance

 

$

7,153,300

 

$

12,888,300

 

$

8,225,000

 

Valuation allowance

 

(7,153,300

)

(12,888,300

)

(8,225,000

)

Net deferred tax (liabilities) assets

 

$

 

$

 

$

 

 

F-26



Table of Contents

 

CUBIC ENERGY, INC.

 

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

The following table summarizes the difference between the actual tax provision and the amounts obtained by applying the statutory tax rates to the income or loss before income taxes for the years ended June 30, 2010, 2009 and 2008:

 

 

 

2010

 

2009

 

2008

 

Tax (benefit) calculated at statutory rate

 

$

(1,234,000

)

$

(6,191,000

)

$

(1,282,000

)

Losses not providing tax benefits

 

1,234,000

 

6,191,000

 

1,282,000

 

Current federal income tax provision (benefit)

 

$

 

$

 

$

 

Change in valuation allowance

 

$

5,735,000

 

$

(4,663,300

)

$

(4,120,200

)

 

As of June 30, 2010, the Company had net operating loss carryforwards of approximately $21,236,400, which are available to reduce future taxable income. These carryforwards expire as follows:

 

 

 

 

 

Net operating

 

 

 

Year

 

losses

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2028

 

10,170,500

 

 

 

2029

 

11,065,900

 

 

F-27



Table of Contents

 

CUBIC ENERGY, INC.

 

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

Note H — Commitments and contingencies:

 

Key personnel

 

The Company depends to a large extent on the services of Calvin A. Wallen III, the Company’s President, Chairman of the Board, and Chief Executive Officer. The loss of the services of Mr. Wallen would have a material adverse effect on the Company’s operations.

 

On February 29, 2008, the Company entered into employment agreements with Mr. Wallen and its Secretary, Jon S. Ross. The agreement with Mr. Wallen provides for a base salary of $200,000 per year, while the agreement with Mr. Ross provides for a base salary of $150,000 per year. The other terms and conditions of the agreements are substantially consistent.

 

Both agreements provide for a term of employment of 36 months from the effective date of February 1, 2008, which term shall be automatically extended by one additional month upon the expiration of each month during the term; provided, that the Company may terminate subsequent one-month extensions at any time. Each agreement is subject to early termination by the Company in the event that the employee dies, becomes totally disabled or commits an act constituting “Just Cause” under the agreement. The agreements provide that Just Cause includes, among other things, the conviction of certain crimes, habitual neglect of his duties to the Company or other material breaches by the employee of the agreement. Each agreement also provides that the employee shall be permitted to terminate his employment upon the occurrence of “Good Reason,” as defined in the agreement. The agreements provide that Good Reason includes, among other things, a material diminution in the employee’s authority, duties, responsibilities or salary, or the relocation of the Company’s principal offices by more than 50 miles. If the employee’s employment is terminated by (a) the Company other than due to the employee’s death, disability or Just Cause, or (b) the employee for Good Reason, then the Company is required to pay all remaining salary through the end of the then-current term. The foregoing severance payment is subject to reduction under certain conditions.

 

Environmental matters

 

The Company’s operations and properties are subject to extensive and changing federal, state and local laws and regulations relating to environmental protection, including the generation, storage, handling and transportation of oil and gas and the discharge of materials into the environment. The Company generates typical oil and gas field wastes, including hazardous wastes that are subject to the federal Resources Conservation and Recovery Act and comparable state statutes. Furthermore, certain wastes generated by the Company’s oil and gas operations that are currently exempt from regulation as “hazardous wastes” may in the future be designated as “hazardous wastes” and therefore be subject to more rigorous and costly operating and disposal requirements. All of the Company’s properties are operated by third parties over whom the Company has limited control. In addition to the Company’s lack of control over properties operated by others, the failure of previous owners or operators to comply with applicable environmental regulations may, in certain circumstances, adversely impact the Company.

 

Legal proceedings

 

The Company is facing a lawsuit from one mineral owner, Gloria’s Ranch, LLC that would have a material effect on the acreage position of the Company if ultimately adjudicated entirely in favor of the mineral owner. The Company believes it will prevail regarding a majority, if not all, of the acreage at issue in the Gloria’s Ranch lawsuit.

 

F-28



Table of Contents

 

CUBIC ENERGY, INC.

 

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

Note I - Cost of oil and gas properties: 

 

Costs incurred 

 

Costs (capitalized and expensed) incurred in oil and gas property acquisition, exploration, and development activities for the years ended June 30, 2010, 2009 and 2008 were as follows: 

 

 

 

2010

 

2009

 

2008

 

Property acquisitions

 

$

1,777,848

 

$

72,385

 

$

394,675

 

Exploration

 

 

5,928,825

 

14,030,615

 

Development

 

6,988,114

 

 

916,613

 

 

 

$

8,765,962

 

$

6,001,210

 

$

15,341,903

 

 

Capitalized costs

 

The aggregate amounts of capitalized costs relating to oil and gas producing activities and the aggregate amounts of the related accumulated depreciation, depletion, and amortization at June 30, 2010, 2009 and 2008 were as follows:

 

 

 

2010

 

2009

 

2008

 

Proved properties

 

$

37,033,711

 

$

37,907,410

 

$

29,542,015

 

Unproved properties

 

130,446

 

890,715

 

3,254,901

 

 

 

37,164,157

 

38,798,125

 

32,796,916

 

Less: accumulated depreciation, depletion and amortization of oil and gas properties

 

6,071,190

 

4,923,318

 

4,156,650

 

Total properties

 

31,092,967

 

33,874,807

 

28,640,266

 

Less: accumulated impairment of oil and gas properties due to full cost ceiling test

 

(22,181,701

)

(22,181,701

)

(1,790,882

)

Net properties

 

$

8,911,266

 

$

11,693,106

 

$

26,849,384

 

 

F-29



Table of Contents

 

CUBIC ENERGY, INC.

 

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

Results of operations

 

The results of operations from oil and gas producing activities for the years ended June 30, 2010, 2009 and 2008 were as follows:

 

 

 

2010

 

2009

 

2008

 

Revenues:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Revenues

 

$

3,486,171

 

$

1,858,139

 

$

2,302,310

 

Preferred return

 

 

 

 

 

 

3,486,171

 

1,858,139

 

2,302,310

 

Expenses (excluding G&A and interest expense):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Production, operating and development costs

 

1,845,153

 

1,372,041

 

1,162,489

 

Depreciation, depletion and amortization

 

1,147,872

 

766,669

 

2,149,570

 

Impairment loss on oil and gas properties

 

 

20,390,819

 

 

 

 

2,993,025

 

22,529,529

 

3,312,059

 

Results before income taxes

 

493,146

 

(20,671,390

)

(1,009,749

)

Provision for income taxes

 

 

 

 

Results of operations (excluding corporate overhead and interest expense)

 

$

493,146

 

$

(20,671,390

)

$

(1,009,749

)

 

Note J - Oil and gas reserves information (unaudited):

 

The estimates of proved oil and gas reserves utilized in the preparation of the financial statements are estimated in accordance with guidelines established by the SEC and the FASB, which require that reserve estimates be prepared under existing economic and operating conditions with no provision for price and cost escalations over prices and costs existing at year-end except by contractual arrangements.

 

The Company emphasizes that reserve estimates are inherently imprecise. Accordingly, the estimates are expected to change as more current information becomes available. The Company’s policy is to amortize capitalized oil and gas costs on the unit of production method, based upon these reserve estimates. The amortization was $1.43 per Mcf during the six month period ended June 30, 2010, as compared to $2.55 per Mcf and $8.79 per Mcf during the same periods in 2009 and 2008, respectively. It is reasonably possible that, because of changes in market conditions or the inherent imprecision of these reserve estimates, that the estimates of future cash inflows, future gross revenues, the amount of oil and gas reserves, the remaining estimated lives of the oil and gas properties, or any combination of the above may be increased or reduced in the near term.

 

If reduced, the carrying amount of capitalized oil and gas properties may be reduced materially in the near term.

 

F-30



Table of Contents

 

CUBIC ENERGY, INC.

 

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

The following unaudited table sets forth proved oil and gas reserves, all within the United States, at June 30, 2010, 2009 and 2008 together with the changes therein:

 

 

 

Natural Gas (Mcfs)

 

 

 

2010

 

2009

 

2008

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Proved developed and undeveloped reserves:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Beginning of year

 

20,319,627

 

6,089,729

 

4,242,051

 

Revisions of previous estimates

 

1,399,599

 

5,233,858

 

(1,969,397

)

Purchases of reserves in place

 

0

 

0

 

0

 

Extensions and discoveries

 

8,838,950

 

9,275,556

 

4,045,294

 

Production

 

(792,433

)

(279,516

)

(228,219

)

Disposals of reserves in place

 

(608,463

)

0

 

0

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

End of year

 

29,157,280

 

20,319,627

 

6,089,729

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Proved developed & undeveloped reserves, end of year

 

29,157,280

 

20,319,627

 

6,089,729

 

 

 

 

Oil, Condensate, Ngl (Bbls)

 

 

 

2010

 

2009

 

2008

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Proved developed and undeveloped reserves:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Beginning of year

 

126,209

 

88,948

 

12,830

 

Revisions of previous estimates

 

(112,547

)

(8,917

)

(1,002

)

Purchases of reserves in place

 

0

 

0

 

0

 

Extensions and discoveries

 

1,038

 

49,711

 

79,861

 

Production

 

(2,279

)

(3,533

)

(2,741

)

Disposals of reserves in place

 

(3,774

)

0

 

0

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

End of year

 

8,647

 

126,209

 

88,948

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Proved developed & undeveloped reserves, end of year

 

8,647

 

126,209

 

88,948

 

 

 

 

Natural Gas (Mcfs)

 

 

 

2010

 

2009

 

2008

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Proved developed reserves:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Beginning of year

 

337,993

 

1,019,276

 

1,037,238

 

End of year

 

2,666,610

 

337,993

 

1,019,276

 

 

 

2,328,617

 

 

 

 

 

Proved undeveloped reserves:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Beginning of year

 

19,981,634

 

5,070,453

 

3,204,813

 

End of year

 

26,490,670

 

19,981,634

 

5,070,453

 

 

 

 

 

Oil, Condensate, Ngl (Bbls)

 

 

 

2010

 

2009

 

2008

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Proved developed reserves:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Beginning of year

 

2,968

 

23,645

 

3,062

 

End of year

 

1,166

 

2,968

 

23,645

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Proved undeveloped reserves:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Beginning of year

 

123,241

 

65,303

 

9,768

 

End of year

 

7,481

 

123,241

 

65,303

 

 

F-31



Table of Contents

 

CUBIC ENERGY, INC.

 

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

The majority of the Company’s Louisiana acreage lies atop the center of what is known in our industry as the “Haynesville Shale Play” (which we refer to as the “Bossier/Haynesville shale” elsewhere herein), one of the most prolific field discoveries in the United States. The discovery of the existence of the Bossier/Haynesville shale formations in the Company’s acreage in fiscal 2008 led to a shift in strategy away from concentrating solely on the development of the Cotton Valley and other shallow formations in our Bethany Longstreet and Johnson Branch fields, and to commencement of the development of the Bossier/Haynesville shale acreage.  Development slowed in fiscal 2009, due to deteriorated economic conditions, a harsh debt and equity environment, stubbornly high field operation costs, and collapse in the pricing of natural gas.

 

The strategic transactions consummated by the Company in the first half of fiscal, 2010 repositioned the Company for increased development of its acreage.  And, development activity did gain momentum by the second half of fiscal 2010, with increased activity undertaken by EXCO as well as other third party Operators.

 

The “Revisions of previous estimates” amount of 1,399,599 Mcf in fiscal 2010 was primarily a result of more performance information being available for the fiscal 2010 reserve report. Based on updated performance rates and significantly lower natural gas prices, downward revisions of an aggregate of 3,834,259 Mcf were made to the proved developed reserves of our Bossier/Haynesville shale horizontal wells and our Cotton Valley vertical wells.  Despite depressed natural gas prices, an upward revision of an aggregate of 821,346 Mcf was recognized for certain sections in which the Company maintains a working interest stemming from pre-existing proved undeveloped offset locations, resulting from the proximity to a competitor’s productive horizontally-drilled Haynesville Shale wells.

 

The “Extensions and discoveries” amount of 8,838,950 Mcf in fiscal 2010 was primarily due to new proved undeveloped offset locations in which the Company maintains a working interest based upon the proximity to a competitor’s productive horizontally-drilled Haynesville Shale wells. This amount was also due to a much lesser extent as a result of exploratory and developmental, or “step out”, drilling in our Johnson Branch acreage in fiscal 2010. The reserve estimates attributable to these new proved undeveloped locations are listed under “Extensions and discoveries.”

 

F-32



Table of Contents

 

CUBIC ENERGY, INC.

 

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

Standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows relating to proved reserves:

 

The Standardized Measure of discounted future net cash flows (discounted at 10%) from production of proved reserves was developed as follows:

 

·      An estimate was made of the quantity of proved reserves and the future periods in which they are expected to be produced based on year-end economic conditions.

 

·      In accordance with SEC guidelines, the engineers’ estimates of future net revenues from our proved properties and the present value thereof for fiscal 2010 are made using the twelve-month average of the first-day-of-the-month reference prices as adjusted for location and quality differentials. Prior year estimates were not required to be restated and reflect previously disclosed estimates using year-end prices. These prices are held constant throughout the life of the properties. Oil and natural gas prices are adjusted for each lease for quality, contractual agreements, lease use shrinkage and regional price variations.

 

·      The future gross revenue streams were reduced by estimated future operating costs (including production and ad valorem taxes) and future development and abandonment costs, all of which were based on current costs in effect at June 30 of the year presented and held constant throughout the life of the properties.

 

·      Future income taxes were calculated by applying the statutory federal and state income tax rate to pre-tax future net cash flows, net of the tax basis of the properties involved and utilization of available tax carryforwards related to oil and gas operations.

 

The resulting future net cash flows were discounted using a rate of 10% per annum (Table 1). The standardized measure of discounted net cash flow amounts contained in the following tabulation does not purport to represent the fair market value of the Company’s oil and gas proved by drilling or production history. There are significant uncertainties inherent in estimating timing and amount of future costs. In addition, the method of valuation utilized is based on current prices and costs and the use of a 10% discount rate, and is not necessarily appropriate for determining fair value (Table 2).

 

The following is the estimated standardized measure relating to proved oil and gas reserves at June 30, 2010, 2009 and 2008:

 

Table 1

 

2010

 

2009

 

2008

 

Future cash flows

 

$

148,560,880

 

$

80,937,110

 

$

95,132,248

 

Future production costs

 

(22,826,320

)

(9,382,262

)

(11,759,214

)

Future development costs

 

(32,813,060

)

(38,888,060

)

(34,598,145

)

Future severance tax expense

 

(2,184,380

)

(5,850,567

)

(1,708,116

)

Future income taxes

 

 

 

 

Future net cash flows

 

$

90,737,120

 

$

26,816,221

 

$

47,066,773

 

Ten percent annual discount for estimated timing of net cash flows

 

(25,979,830

)

(16,013,831

)

(13,956,117

)

Standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows

 

$

64,757,290

 

$

10,802,390

 

$

33,110,656

 

 

F-33



Table of Contents

 

CUBIC ENERGY, INC.

 

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

The following is an analysis of changes in the estimated standardized measure of proved reserves during the years ended June 30, 2010, 2009 and 2008:

 

Table 2

 

2010

 

2009

 

2008

 

Changes from:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Sale of oil and gas produced

 

$

(1,641,018

)

$

(486,098

)

$

(1,139,821

)

Net changes in prices and production costs

 

8,664,461

 

(46,382,115

)

13,650,638

 

Extensions and discoveries

 

16,205,860

 

4,501,970

 

23,748,732

 

Revision of previous quantity estimates

 

1,236,952

 

15,167,786

 

(13,379,733

)

Accretion of discounts

 

1,080,239

 

3,311,066

 

682,971

 

Net change in income taxes

 

(324,157

)

 

 

Purchases of reserves in place

 

 

 

 

Disposals of reserves in place

 

(906,387

)

 

 

Development costs incurred that reduced future development costs

 

(1,597,267

)

 

(302,200

)

Changes in future development costs

 

(330,545

)

7,536,184

 

(1,786,129

)

Changes in timing of production and other

 

31,566,762

 

(5,957,059

)

4,806,488

 

Change in standardized measure

 

$

53,954,900

 

$

(22,308,266

)

$

26,280,946

 

 

F-34



Table of Contents

 

CUBIC ENERGY, INC.

 

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

Note K — Selected quarterly financial data (unaudited):

 

Summarized unaudited quarterly financial data for fiscal 2010 and 2009 are as follows:

 

 

 

First

 

Second

 

Third

 

Fourth

 

 

 

 

 

Quarter

 

Quarter

 

Quarter

 

Quarter

 

Total

 

Fiscal 2010

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Revenues

 

$

359,901

 

$

599,117

 

$

898,075

 

$

1,629,078

 

$

3,486,171

 

Loss before income taxes

 

$

(1,129,853

)

$

454,486

 

$

(2,624,315

)

$

(1,636,943

)

$

(4,936,625

)

Net loss

 

$

(1,129,853

)

$

454,486

 

$

(2,624,315

)

$

(1,636,943

)

$

(4,936,625

)

Net loss per common share - basic and diluted (1)

 

$

(0.02

)

$

0.01

 

$

(0.04

)

$

(0.02

)

$

(0.07

)

Weighted average common shares outstanding

 

63,551,697

 

64,674,565

 

66,781,797

 

75,394,579

 

67,583,793

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fiscal 2009

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Revenues

 

$

674,971

 

$

491,966

 

$

293,371

 

$

397,831

 

$

1,858,139

 

Loss before income taxes

 

$

(965,572

)

$

(9,815,239

)

$

(9,187,193

)

$

(4,794,512

)

$

(24,762,516

)

Net loss

 

$

(965,572

)

$

(9,815,239

)

$

(9,187,193

)

$

(4,794,512

)

$

(24,762,516

)

Net loss per common share - basic and diluted (1)

 

$

(0.02

)

$

(0.16

)

$

(0.15

)

$

(0.07

)

$

(0.40

)

Weighted average common shares outstanding

 

60,286,271

 

60,335,564

 

61,430,731

 

62,570,564

 

61,150,400

 

 


(1) The sum of the per share amounts per quarter does not equal the total year amount due to changes in the weighted average number of common shares outstanding in each quarter.

 

Note L — Subsequent Events

 

On July 26, 2010 the Board of Directors for the Company unanimously agreed to the issuance of 2,404 Series A preferred shares to Langtry Mineral & Development, LLC (“Langtry”), an affiliate of Calvin Wallen III, officer and director for the Company, as the payment of dividends due Langtry with respect to the Series A preferred stock held by Langtry. This brings the total preferred shares outstanding to 105,904.

 

On August 30, 2010, the Company entered into a Third Amendment to Credit Agreement (the “Third Amendment”) with Wells Fargo Energy Capital, Inc. (the “Lender”) providing for an increase in the borrowing base for the Company’s revolving credit facility from $25 million to $30 million. The Company borrowed the full amount of the increase in the borrowing base. The indebtedness under the credit facility, which includes the revolving credit facility and a $5 million convertible term loan, bears interest at a fluctuating rate equal to the sum of the Wells Fargo Bank prime rate plus two percent (2%) per annum, matures on July 1, 2012 and is secured by substantially all of the assets of the Company. In connection with entering into the Third Amendment, the Company issued to the Lender additional

 

F-35



Table of Contents

 

CUBIC ENERGY, INC.

 

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

Note L — Subsequent Events (continued)

 

warrants, expiring on December 1, 2014, for the purchase of up to 1,000,000 shares of Company common stock at an exercise price of $1.00 per share, with the availability of the underlying common shares for the warrants subject to NYSE Amex listing of additional shares approval.

 

During August 2010, the Company borrowed short-term funds from Mr. Wallen and his affiliated companies for working interest payments and lease renewal payments. This was necessary due to the timing of the funding of the Third Amendment with our Lender. These funds were repaid in full on August 30, 2010.

 

F-36



Table of Contents

 

EXHIBIT INDEX

 

No.

 

Description

 

 

 

3.1

 

Amended and Restated Certificate of Formation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Registrant’s Form 8-K filed with the SEC on March 10, 2010).

 

 

 

3.3

 

Bylaws (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 of the Company’s Form 10-KSB for the period ended June 30, 2000).

 

 

 

10.1

 

Securities Purchase Agreement, dated as of December 12, 2005, among Cubic Energy, Inc. and each purchaser identified on the signature pages thereto (incorporated by reference to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on December 16, 2005).

 

 

 

10.2

 

Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of December 12, 2005, among Cubic Energy, Inc. and the purchasers signatory thereto (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on December 16, 2005).

 

 

 

10.3

 

Form of Common Stock Purchase Warrant (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 of the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on December 16, 2005).

 

 

 

10.4

 

Common Stock Purchase Warrant, dated February 6, 2006, issued to Petro Capital Securities, LLC (filed as exhibit 10.3 to the Company’s Form 8-K dated February 8, 2006, and incorporated herein by reference).

 

 

 

10.5

 

Common Stock Purchase Warrant, dated February 6, 2006, issued to Petro Capital V, L.P. (filed as exhibit 10.4 to the Company’s Form 8-K dated February 8, 2006, and incorporated herein by reference).

 

 

 

10.6

 

Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of February 6, 2006, by and between Cubic Energy, Inc., Petro Capital V, L.P. and Petro Capital Securities, LLC (filed as exhibit 10.5 to the Company’s Form 8-K dated February 8, 2006, and incorporated herein by reference).

 

 

 

10.7

 

Subscription and Registration Rights Agreement with George Karfunkel, dated July 26, 2006 (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Form 8-K dated July 28, 2006).

 

 

 

10.8

 

Subscription and Registration Rights Agreement with Yehuda Neuberger and Anne Neuberger JTWROS dated July 26, 2006 (filed as Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Form 8-K dated July 28, 2006).

 

 

 

10.9

 

Warrant issued to Yehuda Neuberger and Anne Neuberger JTWROS (filed as Exhibit 10.4 to the Company’s Form 8-K dated July 28, 2006).

 

 

 

10.10

 

Third Amendment to Promissory Note, dated November 10, 2006, by and between, Cubic Energy, Inc. and Tauren Exploration, Inc. (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30, 2006).

 

 

 

10.11

 

Form of Subscription and Registration Rights Agreement (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed December 21, 2006).

 

 

 

10.12

 

Form of Warrant (filed as Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed December 21, 2006).

 

 

 

10.13

 

Credit Agreement dated March 5, 2007 by and between Cubic Energy, Inc. and Wells Fargo Capital, Inc. (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed March 9, 2007).

 

F-37



Table of Contents

 

10.14

 

Warrant to Purchase Shares of Common Stock of Cubic Energy, Inc. dated March 5, 2007, issued to Wells Fargo Energy Capital, Inc. (filed as Exhibit 10.4 to the Company’s Form 8-K on March 9, 2007).

 

 

 

10.15

 

Form of Assignment of Net Profits Interest (filed as Exhibit 10.6 to the Company’s Form 8-K on March 9, 2007).

 

 

 

10.16

 

Employment Agreement with Calvin A. Wallen, III, dated February 29, 2008 (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Form 8-K on March 5, 2008) **.

 

 

 

10.17

 

Employment Agreement with Jon S. Ross dated February 29, 2008 (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Form 8-K on March 5, 2008) **.

 

 

 

10.18

 

Subordinated Promissory Note dated May 6, 2008 (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2008).

 

 

 

10.19

 

First Amendment to Credit Agreement with Wells Fargo Energy Capital dated May 8, 2008 (filed as Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2008).

 

 

 

10.20

 

Form of Subscription and Registration Rights Agreement (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed September 1, 2009).

 

 

 

10.21

 

Form of Warrant (filed as Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed September 1, 2009).

 

 

 

10.22

 

Purchase and Sale Agreement (Cubic Override) dated November 24, 2009 between the Company and Tauren Exploration, Inc. (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed December 1, 2009)

 

 

 

10.23

 

Purchase and Sale Agreement (Langtry Override) dated November 24, 2009 between the Company and Langtry Mineral & Development, LLC (filed as Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed December 1, 2009)

 

 

 

10.24

 

Subscription and Common Stock Purchase Agreement dated November 24, 2009 between the Company and Langtry Mineral & Development, LLC (filed as Exhibit 10.3 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed December 1, 2009)

 

 

 

10.25

 

Subscription and Preferred Stock Purchase Agreement dated November 24, 2009 between the Company and Langtry Mineral & Development, LLC (filed as Exhibit 10.4 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed December 1, 2009)

 

 

 

10.26

 

Second Amendment to Credit Agreement, dated December 18, 2009, by and between Cubic Energy, Inc. and Wells Fargo Energy Capital, Inc. (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed December 23, 2009)

 

 

 

10.27

 

Promissory Note, dated as of December 18, 2009, by Cubic Energy, Inc., payable to Wells Fargo Energy Capital, Inc. in the maximum principal amount of $40,000,000 (filed as Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed December 23, 2009)

 

 

 

10.28

 

Convertible Promissory Note, dated as of December 18, 2009, by Cubic Energy, Inc., payable to Wells Fargo Energy Capital, Inc. in the principal amount of $5,000,000 (filed as Exhibit 10.3 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed December 23, 2009)

 

F-38



Table of Contents

 

10.29

 

Amended and Restated Warrant to Purchase Shares of Common Stock of Cubic Energy, Inc., dated December 18, 2009, issued to Wells Fargo Energy Capital, Inc. (filed as Exhibit 10.4 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed December 23, 2009)

 

 

 

10.30

 

Warrant to Purchase Shares of Common Stock of Cubic Energy, Inc., dated December 18, 2009, issued to Wells Fargo Energy Capital, Inc. (filed as Exhibit 10.5 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed December 23, 2009)

 

 

 

10.31

 

Amended and Restated Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of December 18, 2009, by and between Cubic Energy, Inc. and Wells Fargo Energy Capital, Inc. (filed as Exhibit 10.6 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed December 23, 2009)

 

 

 

10.32

 

Subordinated Promissory Note, dated as of December 18, 2009, by Cubic Energy, Inc., payable to Calvin A. Wallen, III (filed as Exhibit 10.7 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed December 23, 2009)

 

 

 

10.33

 

Third Amendment to Credit Agreement, dated August 30, 2010, by and between Cubic Energy, Inc. and Wells Fargo Energy Capital, Inc. (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed September 1, 2010)

 

 

 

10.34

 

Warrant to Purchase Shares of Common Stock of Cubic Energy, Inc., dated August 30, 2010, issued to Wells Fargo Energy Capital, Inc. (filed as Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed September 1, 2010)

 

 

 

10.35

 

Second Amended and Restated Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of August 30, 2010, by and between Cubic Energy, Inc. and Wells Fargo Energy Capital, Inc. (filed as Exhibit 10.3 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed September 1, 2010)

 

 

 

10.36

 

Cubic Energy, Inc. 2005 Stock Option Plan (filed as Exhibit D to file Company’s Definitive Schedule 14A filed with the SEC on December 12, 2005) **

 

 

 

10.37

 

Amendment to Cubic Energy, Inc. 2005 Stock Option Agreement effective as of May 7, 2010(filed as Exhibit 10.37 to the Company’s Form 10-K filed September 28, 2010) **

 

 

 

23.1*

 

Consent of Philip Vogel & Co., PC

 

 

 

23.2*

 

Consent of RPS

 

 

 

31.1*

 

Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Calvin A. Wallen, III

 

 

 

31.2*

 

Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Larry G. Badgley

 

 

 

32.1*

 

Section 1350 Certification of Calvin A. Wallen, III

 

 

 

32.2*

 

Section 1350 Certification of Larry G. Badgley

 

 

 

99.1*

 

RPS Reserve Report summary letter

 


 

* Filed herewith.

 

** Management Compensation Contracts

 

F-39